Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/15/1995 'r STATUTORY PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING MINUTES A Statutory Public Information Meeting was held on Thursday, June 15, 1995 at 7:00 p.m in the Council Chambers. "W' "- \w PRESENT: Councillor Johnson - Chairman ALSO PRESENT: B. Taylor L. Taylor C. Wong A. Smith R Taylor - Town Clerk - Manager, Current Operations Division - Senior Planner - Planner I - Planning Technician I (I) LOCAL OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION 94-005/P ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 15/91 MINISTER'S ZONING ORDER APPLICATION 18Z0-0299106 (REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION 91-043/D) 908127 ONTARIO INC. PART OF LOT 9, CONCESSION 6 (NORTH SIDE OF IDGHW AY #7. EAST OF WESTNEY ROAD) 1. An explanation of the application, as outlined in Information Report #18/95, was given by Adrian Smith, Planner 1. 2. John McDermott, representing the applicant, stated that the subject lands contain varied topographical features. About five acres are scrub, the most northerly 136 metres are within the proposed Highway #407 corridor and all the subject lands are subject to an Ontario Municipal Board hearing. Surrounding lands have also been evaluated and he noted that a cemetery would make an acceptable transition between the built up areas and the rural areas. He noted that the Region of Durham is considering a by-pass of the hamlet of Greenwood and this may involve the subject lands. Mr. McDermott noted that a public information centre was held in Greenwood on June 7, 1995. Sideline 8 would be re-designed near its intersection with Highway #7 and the applicant would pay for this construction. There will be a main entrance to the cemetery about 150 metres north of Highway #7 and there would be a second entrance to the north of the main entrance for maintenance vehicles. The focus of the cemetery would be a chapel, office and crematorium that would be architecturally pleasing. There would be a temporary maintenance building at the west edge of the property but this would be moved to the northwest comer of the subject lands when Phase 2 is developed. The perimeter of the subject lands would be landscaped and they will develop a pond that would be the focus of the open space area and assist with storm water management. No off-site drainage works are required. .. . ./2 --2-- ...,. 3. Don Drake, RR #1, Locust Hill, commended staff the development of the rural area policies. He noted that a cemetery use is perpetual and that people in the future will not want to do anything with these lands. He did submit a letter to the Planning Department dated May 25, 1995 outlining his concerns. Sideline 8 will be paved as a result of the cemetery and this will encourage people to speed along it. He has consulted with other farmers who have all indicated that a cemetery is not a compatible use with a farming operation. He noted that there are already many cemeteries in the area and only the crematorium is a new use but asked if it is worth destroying the subject lands for a crematorium. 4. Allan Clark, 2750 Highway #7, stated that he has an 82 acre farm to the east of the subject lands which has been in his family for four generations. He provided a written submission to the Planning Department dated May 25, 1995. He noted that a cemetery operation is a subsurface operation and alters the land for perpetuity. He is very concerned that the quality of water he now taps into may be affected by the cemetery. Surface water is a concern and he stated that more detail is required to determine how much of the subject lands can be used for cemetery purposes. The applicant should be required to undertake two engineering studies to determine concerns about water. ..... 5. Fred Beer, representing the Pickering Rural Association, stated that he is concerned about the possible pollution of the acquifers. He noted that this cemetery could accommodate at least 91,800 bodies which could create toxic fluids that could leach into the acquifer. This development must be subjected to close environmental scrutiny. 6. Councillor Pistritto stated that the location of the cemetery could create traffic problems. He noted that the area is very wet and that there are many cemeteries in the area and more are not needed at this time. 7. John McDermott, representing the applicant, stated that hydrogeological studies have been completed and submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Energy and the Health Unit. He has consulted with the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority about surface water and an independent study has been undertaken to address this issue. The cemetery is regulated by the Province and will be in existence for many years through perpetual care trust funds. This cemetery will be multidenominational and be used by all residents. ..... (ll) ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 4/95 STEELE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS BLOCK 22, PLAN 40M-1365 (SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FINCH AVENUE AND DIXIE ROAD) 1. An explanation of the application, as outlined in Information Report #13/95, was given by Lynda Taylor, Manager, Current Operations Division. 'w .. . ./3 --3-- '-' 2. Judy Shanks, 1977 Lydia Crescent, stated that last year through a Committee of Adjustment decision, the owner was able to increase the building size by 40% to allow for a doctor or dentist office. At that time, she objected to the building extension because of noise from air conditioners and vandalism The owner cannot lease to doctors and dentists because the rent is too high and a restaurant use would cause odours, vandalism and parking problems. At the Committee of Adjustment hearing, the owner stated that there would be no parking to the rear of the building at that time which leads her to believe it could be allowed in the future. Uses that operate beyond 8:00 p.m should not be permitted and acceptable tenants would be professionals such a doctors, accountants, lawyers, etc. She has a petition of area residents objecting to the proposal. She also questioned the security of the property. 3. James Van Dusen, 1963 Lydia Crescent, stated that before he purchased his home two years ago, he investigated uses in the area and was pleased with what he found. This application will allow undesirable uses and current problems with crime will escalate. '-" 4. Maria Giokas, 1979 Lydia Crescent, stated that her house backs onto the subject lands and she has had problems with vandalism He noted that the building was expanded to allow only doctors and dentists. 5. Brian Bond, 1962 Lydia Crescent, stated that his property backs onto Dixie Road across from the donut shop. The Police are often at the donut shop to control vandals and the noise from the donut shop and plaza is such that he is not able to open the windows in his house. 6. Joyce Herzog, representing the Liverpool West Community Association, stated that the Pine Creek Trail exits at the subject lands and should be rehabilitated. A use such as a restaurant next to a residential area is not appropriate because it increases traffic and noise. The increase to the size of the building on the subject lands had a negative impact and should not be made worse by allowing a restaurant. The area residents should not be impacted by any financial problems the owner may be experiencing with the plaza. A commercial school or health club should not be permitted because of inadequate parking and a lack of transit services to the property. ..... 7. Sylvia Spencer, 771 Sheppard Avenue, asked what type of restaurant would be permitted on the subject lands and if a pharmacy would be a permitted use. She noted that parking is inadequate on the subject lands. A bank use would be permissible but it could be subject to crime. Any retail uses should be clearly defined. 8. Denis Lemoire, 1989 Lydia Crescent, stated that he is concerned about the proposed restaurant use. He is already impacted by noise from the donut shop on Dixie Road. 9.. Isabel KelaH: 1973 Lydia Crescent, stated that she lives next to the walkway and noted that teens cause a lot of noise and have damaged her fence. The only uses that should be permitted are professional offices because they will not have a negative impact on the residential area. ... ..../4 --4-- '-" 10. An unidentified man stated that he is concerned that the plaza on the subject lands is changing again after the Committee of Adjustment allowed the expansion. The plaza is a hangout for teens and the firefighters are also experiencing vandalism and want to build a fence. 11. A. Smuschkowitz, representing the applicant, confirmed that two years ago he did seek an expansion to the plaza to provide for medical and dental offices. He wanted a walk in clinic but Provincial policies precluded this use and now much of the plaza is vacant in both the old and new areas. The present zoning allows very limited uses and he is now looking for expanded uses that are compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood. When the plaza was expanded, he id erect a wood fence and put in extensive planting to alleviate noise from air conditioners. (Ill) ZONING B-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 8/95 G. & A. ACKROYD ...... PART OF LOT 10, PLAN 282 (NORTH SIDE OF W ATERFORD GATE. WEST SIDE OF OAKBURN ST) 1. An explanation of the application, as outlined in Information Report #14/95, was given by Lynda Taylor, Manager, Current Operations Division. (IV) ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 9/95 (PLAN OF SUBDWISION 18T-87066{R}) MARSHALL HOMES CORPORATION PART OF LOTS 1 TO 6, PLAN 329 (WEST SIDE OF WOODVIEW AVE. SOUTH OF THE HYDRO CORRIDOR) 1. An explanation of the application, as outlined in Information Report #15/95, was given by Ron Taylor, Planning Technician I. 2. Greg Marshall, representing the applicant, stated that he relotted the draft plan of subdivision to be more consistent with existing development on W oodview Avenue and to allow for better usage of the remaining lots. '-" 3. Bill Neil, 1897 Woodview Avenue, stated that he lives across from the subject lands and that any change from a single detached dwelling to a semi-detached dwelling is adding to the density of the development and should not be allowed. He was concerned that lots 1 and 2 will have reduced frontages and not be in character with the existing neighbourhood. There are many good trees on the subject lands which should not be destroyed. There should be a good tree preservation policy that the developer is made to comply with. He hoped that the changes allowing smaller lots does not set a precedent for other developers. 4. Greg Marshall, representing the applicant, stated that lots 1 and 2 are flankage lots and would look larger and be more in character with existing development on Woodview Avenue. He will be providing a tree preservation plan that will require the approval of the Town. ....... ..../5 --5-- ~ (V) ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 10/95 C.K. SERVICE LIMITED PART OF LOT 27, RANGE 3, B.F.C. (NORTHWEST CORNER OF FAIRPORT RD AND KINGSTON RD) 1. An explanation of the application, as outlined in Information Report #16/95, was given by Lynda Taylor, Manager, Current Operation Division. 2. Steve Page, representing the applicant, stated that the purpose of the application is to provide a viable business for succession from father to son. It is a good time to redevelop the property due to road reconstruction and he noted that a site plan will be entered into. 3. Brian McVitty, representing St. Paul's Anglican Church, asked for a clarification of the application. He is generally in favour of the application, however, he noted that there may not be adequate off-street parking for the expanded uses. He understands that the applicant is trying to acquire additional lands :from the Kingston Road allowance :from the Region of Durham and if this is the case, then this application should be deferred. A very high retaining wall is required at the west side of the property and may affect the day care centre that is on the church property. He noted that there are three large historic maples on the west side of the property and suggested that some changes be made to the site plan to accommodate these trees. ........ 4. Sylvia Spencer, 771 Sheppard Avenue, asked if the service station uses were not viable, would the applicant be allowed to have a used car lot. The application should include mixed office uses and the current design of the buildings will not block lights. The proposed restaurant use will create odours and a six foot wood fence is not adequate to separate this property. The restaurant use is not clearly defined and this property may become a hangout for teens. 5. Tim Costar, 827 Sheppard Avenue, stated that this application is an upgrading of the site. - 6. Steve Page, representing the applicant, asked how this application will now proceed. He noted that trees may be affected by the development of the property, he is trying to get more land on the Kingston Road allowance to accommodate extra parking and the gas bar will have a canopy. (VI) OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION 94-013/P ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION 113/94 WALNUT GROVE PLAZA INC. PART OF LOT 24, CONCESSION 1 (SOUTH SIDE OF KINGSTON ROAD AT WALNUT LANE) 1. An explanation of the application, as outlined in Information Report #17/95, was given by Chris Wong, Senior Planner. ~ ..../6 - ...... ..... ~ --6-- 2. Craig Bamford, representing the Liverpool West Community Association, stated that he is opposed to a general zoning change because some of the proposed uses are not compatible with the existing residential development on the north side of Kingston Road or the proposed residential development in the Town Centre West area. He felt that a list of excluded uses, such as adult entertainment parlours, should be provided. He is sympathetic to the owner having so many vacancies, however, the proposed uses must be defined. Traffic controls along Kingston Road must be improved if further uses are allowed. (IV) ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at the hour of9: 15 p.m Dated ...J \J I\) IC 20) /C,CJ) Clerk