The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08/09/1995 :;:1 '-'" *'t\ OF PIQ 4,0 ~ ~ i STA TUTORY PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING MINUTES A Statutory Public Information Meeting was held on Wednesday, August 9, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Councillor Ryan - Chairman ...... ALSO PRESENT: L. Taylor D. Kearns - Manager, Current Operations Division - Coordinator of Council Services (I) OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION 95-001/P DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 18T-95012 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 5/95 SHRONE VIEW HOLDINGS INC. PART OF LOT 19, CONCESSION 2 (SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BROCK ROAD AND THIRD CONCESSION ROAD) ....... 1. An explanation of the application, as outlined in Information Report #20/95, was given by Lynda Taylor, Manager, Current Operations Division. 2. There were no comments in favour or opposed to this application. (II) DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 18T-95038 ERCOLE RAPONI, IN TRUST PART OF LOTS 10 AND 11, PLAN 282 (EAST SIDE OF WOODVlEW A VENUE. WEST SIDE OF OAKBURN ST) 1. An explanation of the application, as outlined in Information Report #21/95, was given by Lynda Taylor, Manager, Current Operations Division. 2. There were no comments in favour or opposed to this application. ~ 2 (ill) ZONINGB-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 3/95 'V R. & P. PATHAK PART OF LOTS 1 & 2, PLAN 816 (SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SHEPPARD AVE. 7 ROSEBANK ROAD) 1. An explanation of the application, as outlined in Information Report #24/95, was given by Lynda Taylor, Manager, Current Operations Division. 2. R. Singh, 518 Sheppard Avenue, advised that a petition of opposition was delivered to the Town with 45 signatures. Traffic and loitering were concerns expressed. 3. Tom McKay, 431 Sheppard Avenue, questioned whose responsible it will be to clean up the litter from this establishment. He stated concerns with respect to parking and congestion created by the high school students. 4. Dawn Ellis, 1494 Rosebank Road, questioned if the pine trees lining the road would be destroyed. She voiced concerns regarding traffic and accidents. ..... 5. P. Singh, 518 Sheppard Avenue, stated that the property values will decrease if application is approved. Traffic problems which already exist will increase. 6. Patrick Cooney, 526 Sheppard Avenue, outlined traffic congestion at various locations throughout Pickering. He also commented on a number of accidents in the area and questioned where cars were to park. 7. Rick Courtney, 506 Sheppard Avenue, advised that if this store is approved children will cross the railway which is dangerous. He also stated that in the winter cars will end up on his.,front lawn. 8. Corinne Bishop, 1484 Rosebank Road, wished to reiterate concerns already mentioned and stated that the timing of the meeting was poor due to vacations. She has spoken with many people who are in opposition to this application. 9. John Borlase, 543 Barry Drive, stated that this application should be refused. The traffic is already a problem and having no sidewalks would compound the problem. w 10. Vernon Johnston, 510 Sheppard Avenue, requested that when a traffic study is undertaken it be carried out at all times of the day and evening. He stated that cars reach a speed limit of up to 60 mph. 11. Sandra Keith, 473 Sheppard Avenue, commented on the present vacant space and questioned the need for a store in a residential area. The residents were not asked if they wished to have a store and she wondered how many objections had to be received before the application would be dismissed. 12. A business owner at 512 Kingston Road, questioned if a building permit had been issued for the addition already constructed. 13. Mr. Willomitzer, 1490 Rosebank Road, agreed will all comments made previously. w 3 (IV) PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 18T-95039 ERIKA BEHRENDS .,-",. PART OF LOT 128, PLAN 350 (NORTH SIDE OF TOYNEV ALE ROAD. EAST OF ROUGEMOUNT DRIVE) 1. An explanation of the application, as outlined in Information Report #23/95, was given by Lynda Taylor, Manager, Current Operations Division. 2. Mr. Coghlan, 433 Toynevale Road, stated that he had no opposition to the proposal but is concerned with the traffic issue. 3. Joseph Pomanti, area property owner questioned how this proposed development will affect his property. 4. John Belgiorgio, 412 Toynevale Road, questioned if an environmental assessment has been undertaken. He stated that a steel wall is not wanted, the trees make a great buffer. He questioned how quickly further development will happen if this application is approved. 5. Bill Robinson, 414 Toynevale Road, questioned the plans for the vacant lot running between the two properties and asked who will maintain the boulevard if the road is constructed. He advised that a greenbelt runs behind the homes. -- 6. Heather Little, 410 Toynevale Road stated that she purchased her home because of the vacant land and trees behind her property. Her father-in-law, who resides with them, loves wildlife and spends many hours sitting in the backyard watching the varied birds, deer and other animals and she would hate to see him lose this. 7. Robert Adams, 330 Toynevale Road, stated that if this application is approved, scenery will be lost and more noise will be created. 8. Rose Douglas, resident, questioned if the road dotted on the plan is a definite road. 9. The applicant responded to the concern voiced regarding noise by advising that an earth wall will be placed at the rear of the properties along with trees. He also stated that many trees will be preserved. .... (V) ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 11/95 METC PROPERTIES INC. & J.D.S. INVESTMENTS LIMITED PART OF LOT 18, CONCESSION 1 (EAST SIDE OF BROCK ROAD. NORTH OF PICKERING PARKWAY) 1. An explanation of the application, as outlined in Information Report #22/95, was given by Lynda Taylor, Manager, Current Operation Division. 2. Tom Jensen, Amberlea Court, commented on the dances presently being held at the Metro East Trade Centre and questioned how, without a permit, these are allowed. He advised that fences are being destroyed and litter is a constant problem. 3. Michael Perreault, 1873 Larksmere Court, stated that the property values will lower if this application is approved. Traffic congestion is already a problem causing residents to use Pickering Parkway as an alternative. '-' 4. Tom Retsinas, 1685 Fairfield Crescent, stated that the dances are the biggest problem, creating noise and litter. Traffic congestion is already a problem being experienced 4 5. Terry White, 1547 Marshcourt Drive, asked for compassion. He stated that the Metro East Trade Centre and residents are incompatible. The residents look at garbage and deal with the traffic from the dances. Traffic generated by the Flea Market is an ongoing problem. '-'" 6. A new resident of 1847 Banbury Court, advised that helicopter rides, car racing, an a heavy equipment show have all been carried on in the Metro East Trade Centre. If a midway is allowed the noise, traffic, and litter would make it unbearable. He advised that he would sign a petition once circulated. 7. George McKenzie, Bainbridge Drive, stated that his main objection is the dances. The noise is unbearable, causing his home to vibrate. He advised that he will start a petition if necessary. 8. Kim Goodyear, 1861 Bainbridge Drive, advised that when they purchased their home they new and agreed to purchase next door to the Trade Centre, they new the flea market was in operation, but they did not agree to open air concerts and large dances. ..... 9. Resident, 1662 Fairfield Crescent, commented on the poor traffic flow on Sundays due to the flea market. He questioned why other activities are allowed if zoned as a Trade Centre. 10. Resident, 1945 Denmar Road, stated his concern with vandalism and advised that he does not want the Trade Centre. 11. Mr. Konstantinos, 1681 Fairfield Crescent, agreed with all previous comments. He stated that there is no way of reaching the trade centre but by car, creating much congestion. Open air concerts and dances not acceptable. He stated that he is opposed to this proposal. 12. Patrick Gregory, 1687 Fairfield Crescent, stated that he is disturbed by the application for concerts. Concerts draw a great number of people and this type of function should remain downtown. 13. Ed Tann, 1862 Larksmere Drive, reinforced all previous concerns. He advised that the park adjoining the flea market has a lot of garbage which has increased due to the dances presently being allowed. The traffic congestion is upsetting when attempting to travel in the area. '-' 14. Jeff Yetman, 1915 Denmar Road, #139, representing 77 home owners, advised that he would be happy to submit a petition. He stated that there are many little children in the area trying to nap in the mornings and afternoons, and car testing, outside vendors with loud speakers at the flea market make it virtually impossible. Loitering before and after the open air concerts would be a problem. The residents are concerned with increased vandalism and crime. Traffic is an ongoing problem and there have probably not been any midnight bus routes planned by the Transit Department. 15. Keith Wood, Fairfield Drive, commented on the increase in traffic which will occur when the townhouses at Southview Drive are constructed. 16. The applicant stated that they will rethink some aspects of the application and will make further submissions to the Planning Department. -.. 17. Councillor Johnson advised that a community meeting should be held once the new submission has been received. 5 '-" (vn ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at the hour of9:00 p.m. Dated Sf: PT. S- / IS , A-..~. , Clerk ...... ,..., ,...,