Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApril 10, 2024Committee of Adjustment Agenda Hearing Number: 4 Date: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 pickering.ca Agenda Committee of Adjustment Wednesday, April 10, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page Number For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Secretary-Treasurer or Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Telephone: 905.420.4617 Email: citydev@pickering.ca 1.Disclosure of Interest 2.Adoption of Agenda 3.Adoption of Minutes from March 13, 2024 hearing 1-10 4.Minor Variance Reports 4.1 MV 02/24 – 1907 Glengrove Road 11-25 4.2 MV 13/24 – 723 Victory Drive 26-32 4.3 MV 21/24 – 1030 Salk Road 33-44 5.Consent Reports 5.1 LD 01/24 & MV 19/24 – 851 Oklahoma Drive 45-49 5.2 LD 02/24 to LD 04/24 – 1279 & 1281 Commerce Street 50-65 6. Adjournment Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, March 13, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 1 of 10 Pending Adoption Present Omar Ha-Redeye Sakshi Sood Joshi Rick Van Andel Sean Wiley – Chair Also Present Deborah Wylie, Secretary-Treasurer Cody Morrison, Secretary-Treasurer – Host Jasmine Correia, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Kerry Yelk, Planner I Ziya Cao, Planner I Absent Denise Rundle – Vice-Chair 1.Disclosure of Interest Disclosure of interest was indicated by Omar Ha-Redeye for Item 4.3, MV 14/24 byS.Golvin & JMPM Holdings Ltd. Due to an absence, Sean Wiley will abstain from voting at tonight’s hearing in order to prevent a tie vote, with exception to Item 4.3. 2.Adoption of Agenda Moved by Omar Ha-Redeye That the agenda for the Wednesday, March 13, 2024 hearing be adopted. Carried 3.Adoption of Minutes Moved by Rick Van Andel That the minutes of the 2nd hearing of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday,February 14, 2024 be adopted. Carried -1- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, March 13, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 2 of 10 4. Reports 4.1 MV 11/24 K. Denike 1886 Appleview Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-laws 2496/87, 7874/21 and 7902/22 to permit: • a maximum dwelling depth of 31.4 metres for a lot with lot depth greater than 40.0 metres, whereas the By-law permits a maximum dwelling depth of 20.0 metres for lots with depths greater than 40.0 metres; and • a maximum front yard setback of 18.58 metres, whereas the By-law permits a maximum front yard setback of 13.99 metres. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to construct a two-storey detached dwelling. Input from other sources were received from the Applicant, City Engineering Services and City Building Services Section and nine area residents. In support of the application, the applicant stated the proposed placement of the house will maintain the character of the neighbourhood. Kelly Denike, applicant, Yaso Somalingam and Christina Bamsey, agents, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. The applicant commented that they have received support letters from their immediate neighbours and believes the proposal will be an easy transition in the neighbourhood. Committee members commented on the importance of community engagement in commenting on applications before the Committee as it assists in understanding what the public interest is. Moved by Rick Van Andel That application MV 11/24 by K. Denike, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: -2- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, March 13, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 3 of 10 1. That the variances to permit the detached dwelling apply only to the proposed detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated March 13, 2024). Carried 4.2 MV 12/24 Wiltshire Eccleston Developments Inc. 1383 Rougemount Drive The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-laws 2912/88, 7874/21 and 7902/22, to permit a maximum lot coverage of 36.02 percent, whereas the By-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to construct an accessory structure (pool cabana). Input from other sources were received from the Applicant, City Engineering Services and City Building Services. In support of the application, the applicant stated the proposed structure will screen pool equipment and provide privacy for neighbouring properties. Qian Cao, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. The agent commented that the proposal will not affect the privacy of neighbouring properties. A Committee member commented that they have read the report and made a site visit and consider the application to have a minor impact on the neighbourhood and meets the four tests of the Planning Act. Moved by Omar Ha-Redeye That application MV 12/24 by Wiltshire Eccleston Developments Inc., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance applies only to the proposed accessory structure (pool cabana), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated March 13, 2024). Carried -3- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, March 13, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 4 of 10 4.3 MV 14/24 S. Golvin & JMPM Holdings Ltd. 1635 Bayly Street The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-laws 6974/09, 7519/16 and 7828/21, to permit a maximum outdoor storage of 6,000 square metres, where as the By-law prohibits outdoor storage and display. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain site plan approval for a proposed warehouse and office building with 6,000 square metres of accessory outdoor storage. Input from other sources were received from the Applicant, City Engineering Services and City Building Services. In support of the application, the applicant submitted a cover letter in support of the application. David McKay, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. The agent commented that they have read and are satisfied with the staff report. A similar variance was approved in 2022. The applicant requires additional outdoor storage. Appropriate screening along Dillingham Road and locating the storage area at the rear of the site away from Bayly Street are maintained. In response to a question from a Committee member, the agent clarified the space will be used for federal government procurement and will hold seized items. A Committee member agreed with the proposal to have the storage area face Dillingham Road rather than Bayly Street and has no objections. Moved by Rick Van Andel That application MV 14/24 by S. Golvin & JMPM Holdings Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That the variance applies only to the proposed development, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3 & 4 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated March 13, 2024). Carried -4- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, March 13, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 5 of 10 4.4 MV 15/24 R. Sandhu 1808 Dencourt Drive The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1928/84, to permit a maximum lot coverage of 40.7 percent, whereas the By-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to construct a covered deck (awning) in the rear yard. Input from other sources were received from the Applicant, City Engineering Services and City Building Services. In support of the application, the applicant identified to construct a reduced roof structure would not allow maximum benefit from the intended use. Ravinder Sandhu, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. The applicant commented that they are looking to add a roof structure to the back of the house. The house is east facing thus receiving a lot of sun in the backyard. They are looking to enhance the experience of their backyard. Moved by Omar Ha-Redeye That application MV 15/24 by R. Sandhu, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That the variance applies only to the proposed rear yard deck (awning), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, 4 & 5 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated March 13, 2024). Carried -5- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, March 13, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 6 of 10 4.5 MV 16/24 Finch/Pickering Holdings Inc. 550 Finch Avenue The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 6164/03, to permit a maximum gross floor area of 318 square metres for Restaurant Type ‘A’ uses, whereas the By-law permits a maximum gross floor area of Restaurant Type ‘A’ uses on the lot to be 220 square metres. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain a building permit for a restaurant use within Building A on the subject property. Input from other sources were received from the Applicant, City Engineering Services and City Building Services. In support of the application, the applicant submitted a Cover Letter and Parking Justification Rationale. Nicholas Dell, agent, was present to represent the application. One area resident was present in objection to the application. The agent made a brief presentation. An area resident expressed the following concerns in objection to the application: the business seems to be more of a nighttime establishment running until 2:00 am rather than a restaurant; noise; congregation of people; and lack of parking resulting in on-street neighbourhood parking. In response to the concerns listed by the area resident, the agent commented that the name of the establishment and the hours of operation has been disclosed to create the Parking Justification Report. Due to the gross floor area cap, a parking utilization study was required and demonstrated there is ample parking provided during their business hours. Offered the Committee different conditions that could be placed on the decision to remediate any concerns. In response to questions from Committee members, the agent clarified 45 parking spaces provided and 46 spaces are required. The U-Haul business in the plaza no longer requires parking spaces. The establishment has the capacity to hold 60 seats. The Secretary-Treasurer commented that 44 parking spaces are required, and 45 parking spaces are provided. The occupancy load is not a zoning matter rather than a fire services matter. -6- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, March 13, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 7 of 10 A Committee member commented that restaurants are permitted within the plaza, the issue is this would be a bigger restaurant than is currently permitted in the zoning. The building is located farthest west from resident’s houses to the east. In response to the noise concerns, the agent proposed temporary approval of the application. Should the business cause negative impact to the community the variance would be removed. Moved by Rick Van Andel Seconded by Omar Ha-Redeye with an amendment to the motion to include an additional condition That application MV 16/24 by Finch/Pickering Holdings Inc., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the variance applies only to the proposed development, as generally sited, and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated March 13, 2024). 2. That Minor Variance Application MV 16/24 be approved for a (temporary) period of 5 years and shall become null and void on March 13, 2029. (Prior to the Committee’s Decision becoming null and void, the Applicant shall re-apply to the Committee of Adjustment should an increase to the maximum gross floor area of 220 square metres of Restaurant Type ‘A’ uses on the lot is required to comply with the zoning by-law). Carried 4.6 MV 17/24 Lebovic Enterprises & North Pickering Community Management Inc. Plan 40M2625 Blk 288 & Plan 40M2664 Blk 77 (Municipally known as 1100 Azalea Avenue) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 7364/14, as amended by By-law 7857/21 to permit: • a maximum front yard setback of 16.9 metres, whereas the By-law permits a maximum front yard setback of 4.5 metres; and • 13 parking spaces between the building and the flankage lot line and 6 parking spaces between the building and the front lot line, whereas the By-law prohibits parking to be located between a building and the corresponding front lot line and flankage lot line. -7- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, March 13, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 8 of 10 The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain site plan approval for a two-storey elementary school. Input from other sources were received from the Applicant, City Engineering Services and City Building Services. In support of the application, the applicant submitted a rationale in support of the application. Ambrosio Dimagiba, applicant, Keri Beevor and Rochelle Moncarz, agents, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. The agent gave brief justification for the variances being requested. In response to questions from Committee members, the agent indicated the placement of the lots will aid in the safety of the children. A Catholic school will be the only other school being constructed in this subdivision. Moved by Omar Ha-Redeye That application MV 17/24 by Lebovic Enterprises & North Pickering Community Management Inc., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed development, as generally sited, and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, 4 & 5 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated March 13, 2024). Carried 4.7 MV 18/24 Miller Waste Systems Inc. 1220-1280 Squires Beach Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 61/74, to permit accessory structures which are not part of the main building to be erected in the north side yard and front yard. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to permit accessory structures (compressed natural gas station) within the front and north side yard. -8- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, March 13, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 9 of 10 Input from other sources were received from the Applicant, City Engineering Services and City Building Services. In support of the application, the applicant submitted a cover letter in support of the application. Mike Kopansky applicant, Nick Pileggi and Christina Yee, agents, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. The agent made a brief presentation in support of the application. In response to a question from a Committee member, the agent commented that there will be a 70 foot setback from Squires Beach Road. A Committee member commented that this property is designated M2 Industrial Zone within the zoning by-law and considers the application to be minor in nature and desirable for the land. Moved by Omar Ha-Redeye That application MV 18/24 by Miller Waste Systems Inc., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance applies only to the proposed development, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plan (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, 4 & 5 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated March 13, 2024). Carried -9- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, March 13, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 10 of 10 5. Adjournment Moved by Omar Ha-Redeye That the 3rd hearing of the 2024 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 8:17 pm. Carried __________________________ Date __________________________ Chair __________________________ Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Please note the Committee of Adjustment Hearings are available for viewing on the City of Pickering YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/user/SustainablePickering -10- Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 02/24 Date: April 10, 2024 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Minor Variance Application MV 02/24 J. Gunaratnam 1907 Glengrove Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-laws 7874/21 and 7902/22 to permit: • a maximum dwelling depth of 24.5 metres, whereas the By-law permits a maximum dwelling depth of 20.0 metres for a lot with a lot depth greater than 40.0 metres; • a maximum lot coverage of 31.5 percent, whereas the By-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 25 percent; and • a maximum dwelling height of 9.2 metres, whereas the By-law permits a maximum dwelling height of 9.0 metres The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to facilitate the construction of a two-storey detached dwelling. Recommendation For your information, and based solely on the application for minor variance and supporting documentation filed by the applicant, the City Development Department has reviewed the application with respect to Section 45(1) of the Planning Act and considers the requested variances to the maximum dwelling height and maximum lot coverage to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law; however the requested variance to the maximum dwelling depth not to be minor in nature, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law and recommends the following condition should the Committee, after considering all public and agency input, find merit in this application: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed development, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9). -11- Report MV 02/24 April 10, 2024 Page 2 Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan The subject property is designated “Urban Residential Areas – Low Density” within the Liverpool Neighbourhood. The subject property is located within the Liverpool Established Neighbourhood Precinct. Staff have reviewed and prepared comments on the proposed dwelling using the Council-adopted Urban Design Guidelines for Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhood Precincts Checklist, which can be found as Appendix A to this report. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances to the maximum dwelling height and maximum lot coverage conform to the general intent of the Official Plan however the requested variance to the maximum dwelling depth is not in keeping with the general intent of the Official Plan. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The subject property is zoned “R3” – Detached Residential, Third Density, under Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by Infill By-laws 7874/21 & 7902/22. Maximum Dwelling Depth Dwelling depth is the measurement of the distance between the required minimum front yard setback and the rear of the dwelling, which is a measure of how deep a dwelling protrudes into a lot. The intent of requiring a maximum dwelling depth of 20.0 metres is to provide for consistent placement of rear walls on neighbouring properties, and to reduce potential shadowing, massing and privacy impacts on adjacent dwellings and rear yards. The applicant requests a maximum dwelling depth of 24.5 metres, whereas the By-law permits 20.0 metres. The minimum front yard setback requirement for 1907 Glengrove Road is 7.9 metres, which is determined by the existing setback of the neighbouring property to the south (1905 Glengrove Road). The proposed dwelling will have a dwelling depth of 24.5 metres. The dwelling depth from the front main wall to the furthest rear wall along the south side of the dwelling is 23.0 metres and 20.7 metres along the north side of the dwelling. The proposed site of the dwelling will have a consistent front wall with the adjacent existing dwellings along the same side of the street. The furthest rear wall of the proposed dwelling will project 15.0 metres beyond the rear wall of the existing dwelling at 1905 Glengrove Road and 6.0 metres beyond the rear wall of the existing dwelling at 1911 Glengrove Road. The owner has received letters of support from both the abutting properties, including 1903, 1904, 1905, 1911 & 1915 Glengrove Road. The most affected properties located at 1911 and 1905 Glengrove Road have indicated that they have no concerns with the proposed development. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to maximum dwelling depth is not minor and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law however the adjacent properties which will be most impacted by an increase in dwelling depth have submitted letters of support. -12- Report MV 02/24 April 10, 2024 Page 3 Maximum Lot Coverage The intent of this provision is to maintain an appropriate amount of yard space (amenity area) uncovered by structures on a lot, and to regulate the scale and size of the building. The Zoning By-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 25 percent for all covered structures on the property. The By-law restricts the total lot coverage to ensure the property has sufficient area uncovered by structures to accommodate usable amenity area and landscaping. The proposed dwelling accounts for approximately 27.5 percent of the total lot coverage, whereas the various articulations supporting balconies, porches, and decks around the dwelling account for approximately 4 percent of the total lot coverage. The proposal will provide sufficient space on the property left uncovered for soft landscaping and outdoor amenity area, as a minimum front yard setback of 9.6 metres, a minimum rear yard setback of 18.3 metres, and 1.8 metre side yard setbacks will be maintained. As shown on the overall site plan, adequate amenity space is preserved throughout this proposal. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Maximum Dwelling Height The intent of the Zoning By-law requirement for a maximum building height of 9.0 metres is to minimize the visual impact of new buildings on the existing streetscape and ensure that new development is compatible with the surrounding residential neighbourhood. The existing height and built form along Glengrove Road vary from one-storey to two-storey residential dwellings with heights of 5.0 metres to 11.5 metres. The requested increase in height will not alter the character of the neighbourhood and will not have a negative impact on the existing streetscape. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Desirable for the Appropriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The proposed dwelling will be situated on deep residential lot in the Liverpool Established Neighbourhood, and will provide consistency with the neighbouring lots and the general character of the neighbourhood. The requested variances will facilitate the construction of a two-storey detached dwelling on the subject property. The proposed development will feature a built form similar to the recent development along Glengrove Road. The proposed placement of the dwelling generally maintains the consistent streetscape north of the subject property and is compatible with the existing development along the same side of the street. The applicant has provided letters of support from most impacted neighbours located at 1903, 1904, 1905, 1911 & 1915 Glengrove Road. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are desirable for the appropriate development of the land and are minor in nature. -13- Report MV 02/24 April 10, 2024 Page 4 Input From Other Sources Applicant •The proposed dwelling is suitable for the size of the lot. Engineering Services •Ensure the increased dwelling depth and lot coverage does not adversely affect the drainage patterns within thelot and surrounding area. •Multiple Low Impact Development measures (such asinfiltration galleries with downspout connections, rain gardens, permeable pavers, and 450mm topsoil) will berequired at the Building Permit stage. Building Services •No concerns. Public Input •Residents at 1903, 1904, 1905, 1911 & 1915 Glengrove Road have reviewed the site plan and are in support of thework that is planned on the property. Date of report: April 4, 2024 Comments prepared by: Original Signed By Kerry Yelk Planner I Original Signed By Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration KY:jc J:\Documents\Development\D-3700 Committee of Adjustment (PCA Applications)\2024\MV 02-24\7. Report-23 Report.docx Attachments -14- Urban City of Pickering Established A 1 Appendix A Urban Design Guideline Checklist City of Pickering Established Neighbourhood Precincts Urban Design Checklist Please note, if you mark “no” below please provide your rational in the adjacent “Comments” section either supporting, or not supporting the proposal. Yes No Comments x 1. Is the proposed dwelling height and roof pitch similar/compatible with the surrounding dwellings? (see Section 2.1: Guideline 1) x 2. If the proposed new dwelling is significantly taller than an existing adjacent house, does the roof of the proposed new dwelling slope away from the existing adjacent house? (see Section 2.1: Guideline 2) x 3. Is the maximum elevation of the Front Entrance 1.2 metres, or less, above grade? (see Section 2.2: Guideline 1) x 4. Is the main entrance visible from the street? (see Section 2.2: Guideline 2) x 5. Are the stairs to the main entrance designed as an integral component of the front façade? (Section 2.2: Guideline 7) x 6. Does the design of the front entrance reduce the visual dominance of the garage and driveway? (see Section 2.2: Guideline 9) x 7. Does the proposed dwelling have a similar Dwelling Depth to the adjacent dwellings along the street? (see Section 2.3: Guideline 2) The proposed dwelling is 24 metres deep. -15- Appendix A Urban Design Checklist Cont’d Urban City of Pickering Established A 2 Yes No Comments x 8. Does the proposed dwelling have a similar Side Yard Setback to the adjacent dwellings along the street? (see Figure 15) x 9. Has shadow on adjacent dwellings been mitigated with greater Side Yard Setbacks? (Section 3.1: Guideline 2) Side yard setbacks are at the minimum requirement of 1.8 metres. x 10. Is the garage flush or recessed from the main front wall? (see Section 3.2: Guideline 5) The garage is recessed from the main front wall. x 11. Is the proposed driveway width the same as the permitted garage width? (see Section 3.3: Guideline 1) 12. Does the plan preserve existing trees? (see Section 4.1: Guideline 1) -16- Glenview Road G le n a n n a R o a d Valley Farm Road Fieldlight Boulevard Kingst o n R o a d Lo d g e R o a d Fay l e e C r e s c e n t AvonmoreSqu a re Rosefield Road Po p p y L a n e Memory L a n e Brands Court The Esplan a d e N Glengrove Road Esplanade Park Glengrove Park RecreationComplex GlengrovePublic School Location MapFile:Applicant:Municipal Address: MV 02/24 Date: Dec. 07, 2023 Exhibit 1 J. Gunaratnam 1907 Glengrove Road SubjectLands L:\PLANNING\01-MapFiles\MV\2024\MV 02-24\MV02-24_LocationMap.mxd 1:4,000 SCALE: THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. © The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: © King's Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; © His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, Department ofNatural Resources. All rights reserved.; © Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers. All rights reserved.; © Municipal PropertyAssessment Corporation and its suppliers. All rights reserved. City DevelopmentDepartment -17- Ex h i b i t 2 Su b m i t t e d Si t e Pl a n Fi l e No : MV 0 2 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : J. Gu n a r a t n a m Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 19 0 7 G l e n g r o v e R o a d Co n t a c t T h e C i t y o f P i c k e r i n g C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t f o r D i g i t a l C o p i e s o f t h i s P l a n . Da t e : Ma r c h 2 2, 2 0 2 4 Glengrove Road to p e r m i t a m a x i m u m dw e l l i n g d e p t h o f 24 . 5 me t r e s to p e r m i t a m a x i m u m l o t co v e r a g e o f 3 1 . 5 pe r c e n t to p e r m i t a m a x i m u m dw e l l i n g he i g h t o f 9. 2 me t r e s -18- Ex h i b i t 3   Su b m i t t e d F r o n t E l e v a t i o n P l a n Fi l e N o : M V 0 2 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : J . G u n a r a t n a m Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 1 9 0 7 G l e n g r o v e R o a d Co n t a c t T h e C i t y o f P i c k e r i n g C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t f o r D i g i t a l C o p i e s o f t h i s P l a n . Da t e : M a r c h 2 2, 2 0 2 4 -19- Ex h i b i t 4   Su b m i t t e d N o r t h E l e v a t i o n P l a n Fi l e N o : M V 0 2 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : J . G u n a r a t n a m Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 1 9 0 7 G l e n g r o v e R o a d Co n t a c t T h e C i t y o f P i c k e r i n g C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t f o r D i g i t a l C o p i e s o f t h i s P l a n . Da t e : M a r c h 2 2, 2 0 2 4 -20- Ex h i b i t 5   Su b m i t t e d S o u t h E l e v a t i o n P l a n Fi l e N o : M V 0 2 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : J . G u n a r a t n a m Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 1 9 0 7 G l e n g r o v e R o a d Co n t a c t T h e C i t y o f P i c k e r i n g C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t f o r D i g i t a l C o p i e s o f t h i s P l a n . Da t e : M a r c h 2 2, 2 0 2 4 -21- Ex h i b i t 6   Su b m i t t e d R e a r E l e v a t i o n P l a n Fi l e N o : M V 0 2 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : J . G u n a r a t n a m Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 1 9 0 7 G l e n g r o v e R o a d Co n t a c t T h e C i t y o f P i c k e r i n g C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t f o r D i g i t a l C o p i e s o f t h i s P l a n . Da t e : M a r c h 2 2, 2 0 2 4 -22- Ex h i b i t 7 Su b m i t t e d Fi r s t S t o r e y Pl a n Fi l e N o : MV 0 2 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : J. Gu n a r a t n a m Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 19 0 7 G l e n g r o v e R o a d Co n t a c t T h e C i t y o f P i c k e r i n g C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t f o r D i g i t a l C o p i e s o f th i s P l a n . Da t e : Ap r i l 4 , 2 0 2 4 -23- Ex h i b i t 8 Su b m i t t e d Se c o n d St o r e y Pl a n Fi l e N o : MV 0 2 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : J. Gu n a r a t n a m Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 19 0 7 G l e n g r o v e R o a d Co n t a c t T h e C i t y o f P i c k e r i n g C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t f o r D i g i t a l C o p i e s o f th i s P l a n . Da t e : Ap r i l 4 , 2 0 2 4 -24- Ex h i b i t 9 Su b m i t t e d Ba s e m e n t F l o o r Pl a n Fi l e N o : MV 0 2 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : J. Gu n a r a t n a m Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 19 0 7 G l e n g r o v e R o a d Co n t a c t T h e C i t y o f P i c k e r i n g C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t f o r D i g i t a l C o p i e s o f th i s P l a n . Da t e : Ap r i l 4 , 2 0 2 4 -25- Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 13/24 Date: April 10, 2024 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Minor Variance Application MV 13/24 P. Imreibe 723 Victory Drive Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-laws 7610/18, 7872/21, 7873/21, and 7900/22, to permit: • an accessory building (shed) with a maximum height of 3.9 metres, whereas the By-law permits a maximum height of 3.5 metres for accessory buildings within any residential zone; • a total lot coverage of 6.2 percent for all accessory buildings, whereas the By-law permits a total lot coverage of 5 percent for all accessory buildings excluding private detached garages; • a minimum rear yard setback of 1.0 metre to an accessory building (shed), whereas the By-law requires a rear yard setback of 3.0 metres to detached garages and accessory buildings on a corner lot; • a minimum flankage yard setback of 1.0 metre and a minimum rear yard setback of 1.0 metre to an accessory building (shed), whereas the By-laws requires a minimum flankage yard setback of 7.5 metres and a rear yard setback of 3.0 metres for an accessory building erected on the rear yard of a corner lot; and • a minimum flankage yard setback of 3.0 metres to the existing carport, whereas the By-law requires a minimum flankage yard setback of 4.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain a building permit for the construction of a storage shed. Recommendation For your information, and based solely on the application and supporting documentation filed by the applicant, the City Development Department has reviewed the application with respect to Section 45(1) of the Planning Act and considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following conditions are recommended: -26- Report MV 13/24 April 10, 2024 Page 2 1. That the variance applies only to the proposed development (storage shed), as generally sited, and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2 & 3). 2. That appropriate screening, such as privacy fencing and plantings, be provided by the applicant for the proposed storage shed. Comments Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan The subject property is designated “Urban Residential Areas – Low Density Area” within the West Shore Neighbourhood. Residential uses such as detached dwellings and associated accessory structures are permitted within the Urban Residential Areas designations. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The subject property is zoned “R4” in Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-laws 7610/18, 7872/21, 7873/21, and 7900/22. Accessory structures such as storage sheds are permitted within the R4 zone. Variances to the Proposed Storage Shed The applicant is proposing a flat roof storage shed with an area of 34.2 square metres and a height of 3.9 metres in the rear yard of the subject property. The proposed shed accounts for 6.2 percent of the total lot coverage. The By-law permits a total lot coverage of 5 percent for all accessory structures on a lot and permits a maximum height of 3.5 metres for accessory structures within a residential zone. The intent of these provisions is to ensure that an adequate amount of space is left uncovered by buildings on a lot, and to regulate the scale and size of an accessory structure. Additionally, the applicant is proposing to locate the shed on the southeast corner of the lot with a 1 metre setback from the flankage lot line and the rear lot line. The By-law requires a minimum setback of 7.5 metres from the flankage lot line and a minimum setback of 3.0 metres from the rear lot line. The purpose of these provisions is to provide adequate separation distance between buildings, and minimizing visual impacts of the accessory structures to the rear adjacent lot if the rear adjacent lot utilizes the flankage yard as the front yard. The proposed storage shed represents a slight increase from the permitted height and lot coverage requirements. The proposed shed is setback more than 27 metres from the front lot line and provides a minimum of 1 metre setback from the flankage lot line and rear lot line. The proposed storage shed is not expected to generate adverse impacts on the drainage patterns of the area, and will remain visually subordinate to the existing detached dwelling on the lot. Additionally, the applicant has indicated that plantings and privacy fencing will be installed for screening along the flankage lot line and rear lot line to reduce visual impacts of the shed to the adjacent property and from the street. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. -27- Report MV 13/24 April 10, 2024 Page 3 Flankage Yard Setback Variance to Existing Carport The applicant is requesting to recognize a minimum flankage yard setback of 3.0 metres to the existing carport, whereas the By-law requires a minimum flankage yard setback of 4.5 metres. The intent of this provision is to provide adequate separation distance between buildings and street activity in the flankage side yard and to provide an adequate landscaped area. There is currently a row of cedar trees planted along the flankage lot line which assist in reducing the visual impacts of the carport from the street. The provided setback also maintains adequate space for landscaping and maintenance of both the existing dwelling and landscaping on the lot. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is in keeping with general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Desirable for the Appropriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The requested variances will permit a storage shed to be in the rear yard of the subject property. The size of the shed represents a minor increase in the permitted lot coverage and height permissions, and it is not expected to generate significant adverse impacts to the drainage patterns in the area. The applicant has also indicated that privacy fencing and plantings along the flankage lot line and rear lot line of the lot can be provided to screen the shed from the street and from the adjacent property. Staff is satisfied that the requested variances are desirable for the appropriate development of land and are minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Applicant • Building a shed on the corner of the backyard is practical for several reasons. Firstly, it ensures that it doesn't obstruct the patio or intrude on the neighbors' space, maintaining harmony for east and north neighbor. We have patio stones and gas lines going to the middle of the backyard for BBQ. Secondly, it provides a designated area for storing belongings, especially pertinent if lacking a garage. A shed efficiently utilizes space while addressing storage needs, enhancing the functionality and organization of the property. Engineering Services • Ensure the increased lot coverage and reduced minimum rear and flankage yard setbacks do not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lot and surrounding area. Building Services • Storage shed was constructed without the benefit of building permit, permit application is on hold until Committee’s decision. Public Input • One written submission was received from the public in objection of the application as of the date of writing this report. -28- Report MV 13/24 April 10, 2024 Page 4 Date of report: April 4, 2024 Comments prepared by: Original Signed By Ziya Cao Planner I Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration ZC:nr J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2024\MV 13-24\7. Report\MV 13-24 Report.docx Attachments Original Signed By -29- Exhibit 1 I -"' wl I I I I I \ L 0 > C --ro ~ (/Jo Sanok Drive Breezy Drive ~ Cl) C ro ...J rn -0 (.) >, -~ (.'.) - - Vicki Drive - r--- - - - - f---- E ro f----> ~ :J 0 -'OOC Ill Cl) 0 .c -J (/) Oklahoma Drive U) Cl) s c --I ~ Cl) (.) VJ Subject Q) -() /.// Lands f----- - -I ~I I - - -0 f----- ro Cl) 0 -> er: ·.:: 0 ~ f----- >, :J 0 .0 -VJ u ~ I > ro - \ ~ - - Hillcrest Road \ ~ \ f----- \ ~ \ -N-\ ~-\ ~ ______ l.----' rarl<. crescent I I ~ af:j of Location Map File: MV 13/24 PlCKERlNG Applicant: P. lmreibe City Development Municipal Address: 723 Victory Drive © The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: Date: Feb. 12, 2024 Department © King's Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.,© His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its SCALE: 1:2,000 I suppliers. All rights reserved.,© Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its suppliers. All rights reserved. THIS ISNOTAPLANOF SURVEY. L:\PLANNING\01-MapFiles\MV\2024\MV 13--24\MV 13--24.aprx -30- Ex h i b i t 2 Su b m i t t e d Si t e Pl a n Fi l e N o : MV 1 3 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : P. I m r e i b e Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 72 3 V i c t o r y D r i v e Co n t a c t T h e C i t y o f P i c k e r i n g C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t f o r D i g i t a l C o p i e s o f t h i s P l a n . Da t e : Ma r c h 2 0 , 2 0 2 4 to p e r m i t an a c c e s s o r y b u i l d i n g (s h e d ) w i t h a m a x i m u m h e i g h t o f 3. 9 m e t r e s to p e r m i t a to t a l lo t co v e r a g e of 6. 2 p e r c e n t fo r al l a c c e s s o r y bu i l d i n g s to p e r m i t a mi n i m u m r e a r ya r d s e t b a c k o f 1. 0 m e t r e t o a n ac c e s s o r y bu i l d i n g ( s h e d ) to p e r m i t a m i n i m u m fl a n k a g e y a r d s e t b a c k o f 1. 0 m e t r e s a n d m i n i m u m re a r y a r d s e t b a c k o f 1. 0 me t r e t o a n ac c e s s o r y b u i l d i n g ( s h e d ) to r e c o g n i z e a m i n i m u m fl a n k a g e y a r d s e t b a c k o f 3. 0 m e t r e s t o t h e e x i s t i n g ca r p o r t -31- Ex h i b i t 3 3 Su b m i t t e d Si t e Pl a n Fi l e N o : MV 1 3 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : P. I m r e i b e Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 72 3 V i c t o r y D r i v e Co n t a c t T h e C i t y o f P i c k e r i n g C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t f o r D i g i t a l C o p i e s o f t h i s P l a n . Da t e : Ma r c h 2 0 , 2 0 2 4 No r t h ( L e f t ) So u t h ( R i g h t ) to p e r m i t an a c c e s s o r y bu i l d i n g ( s h e d ) w i t h a ma x i m u m h e i g h t o f 3. 9 me t r e s -32- Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 21/24 Date: April 10, 2024 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Minor Variance Application MV 21/24 1000111616 Ontario Ltd. 1030 Salk Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended, to permit: • minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 4.5 metres; • side yard parking no closer than 1.5 metres from the (south) side lot line and 1.5 of a metre on the (north) side lot line, whereas the By-law requires side yard parking to be permitted no closer than 7.5 metres from the side lot line on one side and 1.5 metres on the other side; and • notwithstanding the office and industrial parking requirements, the minimum parking requirement for the proposed building shall be 1 space per 117 square metres of gross floor area, whereas the By-law requires a minimum parking requirement for an industrial use shall be 1 space per 56 square metres of gross floor area and a minimum parking requirement for an office use shall be 5 spaces per 93 square metres. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to facilitate Site Plan Approval (S 02/23) for two 3-storey industrial warehouse buildings having a combined gross floor area of 17,694 square metres. Recommendation For your information, and based solely on the application and supporting documentation filed by the applicant, the City Development Department has reviewed the application with respect to Section 45(1) of the Planning Act and considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and recommends the following conditions should the Committee, after considering all public and agency input, find merit in this application: 1. That these variances apply only to the subject property, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8). 2. That 51 temporary parking spaces are permitted within the proposed right-of-way, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans, until the future right-of-way is conveyed to the City (refer to Exhibit 2). -33- Report MV 21/24 April 10, 2024 Page 2 Background In 2023, the applicant submitted Site Plan Application S 02/23 to facilitate the development of two 3-storey industrial warehouse buildings having a combined gross floor area of 17,694 square metres, Building A being 11,681 square metres and Building B being 6,013 square metres. The applicant is proposing a total of 199 parking spaces (97 surface parking spaces and 51 indoor parking spaces) and 51 temporary parking spaces located within the future right-of-way. The property will be accessed from Salk Road. Under the Official Plan, a future east/west street connection is proposed through the subject property. City Policy 12.10F(e) from the Official Plan, states: “City Council shall… protect for, and implement, the extension of Plummer Street east/west through the hydro corridor to a new City Centre south collector road to accommodate future growth subject to: permission being provided by Ontario Hydro to cross the hydro corridor, or the hydro corridor being deemed surplus by Ontario Hydro; the necessary Environmental Assessment studies being completed; and, funding being made available to move forward with the project.” Through the Site Plan Approval process, the applicant has worked with the City to draft a development proposal that considers the Official Plan policies for a future Plummer Street extension through the subject property. During the review of the Site Plan Application, staff identified the noted zoning non-compliances. The requested variances are required for the applicant to obtain Final Site Plan Approval. Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan The subject property is designated “General Employment” within the Brock Industrial Neighbourhood. Industrial uses including warehousing, light manufacturing, assembly and processing of goods, and office uses as a minor component of industrial operations are permitted within the General Employment designation. Under the City Centre Neighbourhood City Policy 12.10F(e) proposes a future east/west road connection through the subject property. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The subject property is zoned “M1”, under Zoning By-law 2511. Light Manufacturing, Offices, and Warehouse are permitted uses within the Storage & Light Manufacturing Zone. Parking Requirement Variance The intent of regulating the minimum number of parking spaces is to ensure that parking demand can be accommodated on-site. The proposed buildings have a total gross floor area of 17,694 square metres, including 4,420 square metres comprising of office space. The By-law requires a minimum parking of 1 parking space per 56 square metres of gross floor area of industrial use. -34- Report MV 21/24 April 10, 2024 Page 3 Furthermore, the By-law requires a minimum of 5 parking spaces per 93 square metres of gross floor area for office uses. Therefore, the By-law requires 237 parking spaces for warehouse use, and 238 parking spaces for the office use. The applicant has proposed a total of 199 parking spaces on site, including 51 temporary parking spaces located within the future right-of-way. In support of the proposed development and the reduction in parking spaces requested, the applicant submitted a Traffic Impact Study prepared by WPE Engineering Ltd. The proposed warehouse use was compared to the draft Consolidated Zoning By-law parking requirements of 1.0 space per 100 m2 GLFA up to 2,000 m2 GLFA plus 0.5 spaces per 100 m2 GLFA over 2,000 m2 GLFA, and 3.5 spaces per 100 m2 of office space. Under the draft Consolidated Zoning By-law proposed parking ratio a total of approximately 83 parking spaces would be required. Furthermore, the Study expressed concerns that the required parking spaces for industrial use does not consider parking requirements for warehouse and storage uses. To further support the reduced parking supply, the Institute of Transportation (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 11th edition was used to estimate the peak parking demand. Accordingly, the proposed development is expected to generate 27 to 44 two-way trips during the weekday AM peak hour and 31 to 50 two-way trips during the weekday PM peak hour. Applying these calculations concludes that the request for 199 parking spaces, including 49 temporary parking spaces, will be sufficient to support the peak hour use of the site. Furthermore, applying the draft Consolidated Zoning By-law parking provisions, a total of 95 parking spaces would be required, which is 104 parking spaces less than what is proposed for the site. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Parking Space Setback Variance The applicant has proposed minimum side yard parking to be located 1.5 metres from the north side lot line, and minimum 1.5 metres from the south side lot line, whereas the By-law requires side yard parking to be setback a minimum 7.5 metres on one side and 1.5 metres on the other side. The intent of minimum setbacks for parking spaces is to minimize the visual impact of parking for adjacent lots, and to maintain an appropriate buffer between adjacent parking lots. The applicant has proposed a minimum 1.5 metre north side yard setback for the siting of two loading spaces. The existing lands to the north of the development are generally comprised of similar employment uses. The proposed 1.5 metre setback to the two proposed loading spaces will comprise of a landscape buffer between the abutting property. Furthermore, the applicant has proposed a 1.5 metre south side yard setback for 29 parking spaces. The applicant has proposed a 1.5 metre landscape buffer between the proposed parking spaces and the south property line. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. -35- Report MV 21/24 April 10, 2024 Page 4 Side Yard Setback The intent of the minimum side yard setback requirement of 4.5 metres is to provide an appropriate setback for accessing front and rear yards, lot grading and drainage. The applicant is proposing a minimum north side yard setback of 1.5 metres to permit the proposed Building B. The proposed side yard setback maintains an adequate setback for maintenance, lot grading and drainage, and pedestrian access. The proposed reduction in the minimum side yard setback will have no adverse impact on the abutting employment uses to the north. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Desirable for the Appropriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The proposed development will create two warehousing and storage buildings with associated office space. The proposed variances are desirable for the appropriate development of the land as the proposal is in keeping with the range of industrial and employment uses within the Brock Industrial Neighbourhood and the Storage and Light Manufacturing Zone in Zoning By-law 2511. The reduced parking proposed will provide sufficient on-site parking to accommodate the peak demand of employees and visitors and will not impact the surrounding uses. The proposed parking spaces encroaching into the north side yard parking setback requirements are for two loading spaces. The proposed parking spaces encroaching into the south side yard parking setback requirements are for 27 parking spaces. Both the loading and parking spaces will be buffered with 1.5 metre landscape strips for the placement of drainage swales. The requested variances are desirable for the appropriate development of the land and are minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Applicant •Refer to Applicant’s Cover Letter and Traffic ImpactStudy. Engineering Services •No comments. Building Services •No concerns. Public Input •No written submissions were received from the publicas of the date of writing this report. Date of report: April 4, 2024 Comments prepared by: Original Signed By Kerry Yelk Planner I Original Signed By Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration KY:jc J:\Documents\Development\D-3700 Committee of Adjustment\2024\MV 21-24\7. Report Attachments -36- ""O C1l 0 0:: .c () C1l Q) ""O C1l 0 0:: Q) () C -~ <( Hydro Plummer Street Lands Bayly Street Subject Lands co 1-------__J---~~====I >, Hydro Lands Dillingham Road ""O C C1l (/) af:j of Location Map File: MV 21/24 PlCKERlNG Applicant: 1000111616 Ontario Limited City Development Municipal Address: 1030 Salk Road © The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: Department © King's Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.,© His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers. All rights reserved.,© Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its suppliers. All rights reserved. L:\PLANNING\01-MapFiles\MV\2024\MV 21-24\MV 21-24.aprx Exhibit 1 ""O C1l 0 0:: -" () e co Orangebrook Cr /1( ~ Date: Mar. 14, 2024 SCALE: 1:5,500 I THIS ISNOTAPLANOF SURVEY. -37- Exhibit 2 Submitted Overall Site Plan File No: MV 21/24 Applicant: 1000111616 Ontario Ltd. Municipal Address: 1030 Salk Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN.Date: March 22, 2024 Building B (GFA: 6,013 m2) Building A (GFA: 11, 681 m2) Future municipal right-of-way (Plummer Street Extension) to permit a minimum side yard setback 1.5 metres to permit side yard parking no closer than 1.5 metres from the south side lot line and 1.5 metres from the north side lot line notwithstanding the office and industrial parking requirements, the minimum parking requirement shall be 1 space per 117 square metres of gross floor area -38- Ex h i b i t 3 Su b m i t t e d Si t e Pl a n – Bu i l d i n g A Fi l e N o : MV 2 1 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : 10 0 0 1 1 1 6 1 6 O n t a r i o L t d . Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 10 3 0 S a l k R o a d Co n t a c t T h e C i t y o f P i c k e r i n g C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t f o r D i g i t a l C o p i e s o f t h i s P l a n . Da t e : Ma r c h 2 2, 2 0 2 4 Salk Road -39- Ex h i b i t 4 Su b m i t t e d Si t e Pl a n – Bu i l d i n g B Fi l e N o : MV 2 1 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : 10 0 0 1 1 1 6 1 6 O n t a r i o L t d . Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 10 3 0 S a l k R o a d Co n t a c t T h e C i t y o f P i c k e r i n g C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t f o r D i g i t a l C o p i e s o f t h i s P l a n . Da t e : Ma r c h 2 2, 2 0 2 4 Salk Road -40- Ex h i b i t 5 Su b m i t t e d El e v a t i o n Pl a n s – Bu i l d i n g A (E x t e r n a l V i e w ) Fi l e N o : MV 2 1 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : 10 0 0 1 1 1 6 1 6 O n t a r i o L t d . Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 10 3 0 S a l k R o a d Co n t a c t T h e C i t y o f P i c k e r i n g C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t f o r D i g i t a l C o p i e s o f t h i s P l a n . Da t e : Ma r c h 2 2, 2 0 2 4 -41- Ex h i b i t 6 Su b m i t t e d El e v a t i o n Pl a n s – Bu i l d i n g A ( I n t e r n a l V i e w ) Fi l e N o : MV 2 1 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : 10 0 0 1 1 1 6 1 6 O n t a r i o L t d . Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 10 3 0 S a l k R o a d Co n t a c t T h e C i t y o f P i c k e r i n g C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t f o r D i g i t a l C o p i e s o f t h i s P l a n . Da t e : Ma r c h 2 2, 2 0 2 4 -42- Ex h i b i t 7 Su b m i t t e d El e v a t i o n Pl a n s – Bu i l d i n g B Fi l e N o : MV 2 1 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : 10 0 0 1 1 1 6 1 6 O n t a r i o L t d . Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 10 3 0 S a l k R o a d Co n t a c t T h e C i t y o f P i c k e r i n g C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t f o r D i g i t a l C o p i e s o f t h i s P l a n . Da t e : Ma r c h 22 , 2 0 2 4 -43- Ex h i b i t 8 Su b m i t t e d El e v a t i o n Pl a n s – Bu i l d i n g B Fi l e N o : MV 2 1 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : 10 0 0 1 1 1 6 1 6 O n t a r i o L t d . Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 10 3 0 S a l k R o a d Co n t a c t T h e C i t y o f P i c k e r i n g C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t f o r Di g i t a l C o p i e s o f t h i s P l a n . Da t e : Ma r c h 2 2, 2 0 2 4 -44- Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Numbers: LD 01/24 & MV 19/24 Date: April 10, 2024 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Applications LD 19/24 and MV 19/24 A. Turner & L. Warwick851 Oklahoma Drive Applications The applicant is proposing to sever a 570.12 square metre parcel of land (Part 1), retaining a 561.7 square metre parcel of land (Part 2). The existing dwelling is proposed to be retained on the retained parcel. Part 3 and Part 4 will be conveyed to the City for public ownership, where Part 3 represents a 5.0 metre corner rounding to be established as a public highway and Part 4 represents a 0.3 metre reserve. The purpose of the reserve is to restrict access to Oklahoma Drive. Requested Variances MV 19/24 – (Retained Lot – Part 2) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610/18, 7872/21, 7873/22 and 7900/22, as it relates to retaining the existing dwelling on the retained lot, to permit: •a minimum rear yard setback of 2.0 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum rearyard setback of 7.5 metres; •a maximum front yard setback of 11.2 metres, whereas the By-law permits a maximumfront yard setback of 9.94 metres; •a maximum dwelling depth of 25.7 metres, whereas the By-law permits a maximum dwelling depth of 17 metres for lots with depths up to and including 40 metres; •a maximum lot coverage of 49.3 percent, whereas the By-law permits a maximum lotcoverage of 33 percent; and •an uncovered platform (deck) to project a maximum of 4.0 metres into the front yard, a maximum of 2.0 metres into the rear yard, and a maximum of 1.5 metres into the sideyard, whereas the By-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre inheight above grade and not projecting more than 1.5 metres into any required front yard,not more than 0.5 of a metre into any required side yard. -45- Report LD 01/24 & MV19/24 April 10, 2024 Page 2 Recommendation The City Development Department recommends Deferral of Land Division Application LD 01/24 and Minor Variance Application MV 19/24 to the May 8, 2024 Committee of Adjustment Hearing to allow the applicant to address the zoning non-compliance that is generated for severed lot due to the conveyance of the 0.3 metre reserve. Background On April 3, 2024, the City Development Department received comments and conditions from the Engineering Services Department regarding the subject applications. Condition 3 within the Engineering Services Department’s memo, dated April 3, 2024, requires that a 0.3 metre reserve (Part 4) is to be conveyed to the City (refer to Attachment 1). The conveyance of Part 4 will result in a reduced lot size for the severed lot. The resulting lot frontage for the severed lot (Part 1) will be 14.94 metres, whereas the Zoning By-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres. This deficiency was not captured in the public notices issued for this Committee of Adjustment hearing. City Development staff is requesting that these applications be deferred to the May 8, 2024 Committee of Adjustment hearing to allow the applicant to address the zoning non-compliance that is identified because of the conveyance of the reserve. Date of report: April 4, 2024 Comments prepared by: Original Signed By Ziya Cao Planner I Original Signed By Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration ZC:jc J:\Documents\Development\D-3500 Consents, Severances (LD Applications)\2024\LD 01-24 & MV 19-24\8. Report\LD01-24 & MV 19-24 Report.doc Attachments -46- P a r k C r e s c e n t Hi l l c r e s t R o a d Vicki Drive Sandcastle Court Oklahoma Drive Sanok Drive Gr e y c o a t L a n e Stonebridge Lane Ma r k s b u r y R o a d Vic t o r y D r i v e Hill vi e w Crescent Lookout Point Park Location MapFile:Applicant:Municipal Address: LD 01/24 & MV 19/24 Date: Mar. 12, 2024 Exhibit 1 ¯ E A. Turner & L. Warwick 851 Oklahoma Drive SubjectLands L:\PLANNING\01-MapFiles\MV\2024\MV 19-24\MV19-24_LocationMap.mxd 1:2,500 SCALE:THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. © The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: © King's Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; © His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, Department ofNatural Resources. All rights reserved.; © Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers. All rights reserved.; © Municipal PropertyAssessment Corporation and its suppliers. All rights reserved. City DevelopmentDepartment -47- Memo To: Ziya Cao April 3, 2024 Planner I From: Paal Helgesen Division Head, Water Resources & Development Services Copy: Manager, Zoning & Administration Project Manager, Development Approvals Technician, Development Approvals Subject: Land Division Application LD 01/2024 -A. Turner -851 Oklahoma Drive File: D-4400 Water Resources & Development Services has reviewed the above application and provide the following conditions: 1.We have reviewed the draft reference (40R) plan and find it to be acceptable. The plan can be deposited at the Land Registry Office (LRO). 2.A 5.0m corner rounding at the Oklahoma Drive/Hillview Crescent intersection, indicated as Part 3 on the draft reference plan, is to be conveyed to the City of Pickering and established as public highway. 3.A 0.30m reserve, indicated as Part 4 on the draft reference plan, is to be conveyed to the City of Pickering. 4.The applicant will be required to provide an Engineering Review Fee of $1,700.00 for the two proposed lot(s), and a fee of $2,265.00 for the clearance of Water Resources & Development Services conditions. A cheque, payable to the City of Pickering, in the amount of $3,965.00 will be required. 5.As a condition of severance, the applicant must pay to the City $141.10 ($2,475.00/hectare) for their Stormwater Maintenance Fee. 6.A preliminary grading and drainage plan will be required as a condition of severance. It must contain sufficient information regarding existing and proposed grades such that it can be adequately determined that development of this property will not adversely affect adjacent properties. The plan must illustrate Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Measures for the proposed lots, including, but not limited to, amended topsoil, permeable pavers on the driveway, infiltration galleries, and rain gardens. The plan should indicate existing vegetation/trees within and adjacent to the property that may be affected. Attachment 1 -48- April 3, 2024 Page 2 of 2 Land Division Application LD 01/2024 The plan should indicate the proposed driveway locations and existing utilities within the boulevard. Relocation of utilities will be the applicant’s responsibility. 7. The City requires a stormwater management brief to be submitted for review. The brief shall address the following design criteria: • The 5-year post-development flow from the proposed development shall not exceed the 5-year pre-development flow. The runoff in excess of the pre-development flow must be retained on the site through the implementation of Low Impact Development (LID) measures, such as soakaway pits/infiltration trenches. All LID measures must be designed in accordance with the Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Planning and Design Guide (CVC, TRCA, 2010). Sizing calculations and design information for all proposed LIDs must be provided in a Stormwater Management Brief signed and sealed by a Professional. Locations and details of the proposed measures must be shown on the Site Servicing/Grading Plan. • All proposed LID measures must be located solely on private property and must be owned and maintained by the property owner. All necessary information regarding the function and maintenance of LID must be included in the purchase agreements. Section 119 Restrictive Covenant is to be registered on title prohibiting the alteration or removal of the LID measures. • A minimum of 450mm depth of amended soils should be specified for all grassed areas such as back yards, front yards, and side yards. Add appropriate notes to the Site and Grading Plan. • Foundation/sump pump discharge into the existing storm sewer is not permitted. 8. A Tree Inventory and Protection/Removal Plan, prepared by a qualified Arborist or an Environmental Consultant is required. This information should address matters such as existing tree species, diameter, health, protection/removal strategies, and a proposed replanting plan. Compensation for loss of tree canopy will be required and is over and above any required boulevard tree as per the Boulevard Tree Planting Program. 9. One boulevard tree will be required for the new dwelling. If there is insufficient space, cash- in-lieu as per the current Development Services User Fee Schedule will be required. PH:lj -49- Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Numbers: LD 02/24 to LD 04/24 Date: April 10, 2024 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Applications LD 02/24 to LD 04/24 G. Edmiston 1279 and 1281 Commerce Street Applications LD 02/24 The purpose of the application is to permit the severance of a 508.3 square metre residential parcel of land (Parts 2 and 5 on Draft 40-R Plan), retaining a 1,149.1 square metre residential parcel of land (Parts 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8 on Draft 40-R Plan) as outlined on Exhibit 2. LD 03/24 The purpose of the application is to permit the severance of a 359.4 square metre residential parcel of land (Parts 3 and 6 on Draft 40-R Plan), retaining a 789.7 square metre residential parcel of land (Parts 4, 7 and 8 on Draft 40-R Plan), as outlined on Exhibit 3. LD 04/24 The purpose of the application is to permit the severance of a 405.6 square metre residential parcel of land (Parts 4 and 7 on Draft 40-R Plan), retaining a 384.1 square metre residential parcel of land (Part 8 on Draft 40-R Plan), as outlined on Exhibit 4. The effect of the applications is to create three new vacant residential lots and retain a vacant residential lot, any existing buildings and structures on the subject lands are to be removed. Recommendation Staff have reviewed the land division applications, LD 02/24 to LD 04/24, with respect to Section 51(24) of the Planning Act criteria and recommend Approval, subject to the conditions outlined within Appendices I and II. Background 1279 and 1281 Commerce Street (refer to Exhibit 1) were subject to an application for Zoning By-law Amendment (File Number A 01/21) to facilitate the development of four detached residential dwellings. The application established site-specific residential zones that each permit a detached dwelling with slightly modified zoning standards. The application was approved by City Council, and Zoning By-law Amendment 8021/23 came into effect on June 26, 2023. -50- Report LD 02/24 to LD 04/24 April 10, 2024 Page 2 The approved zoning boundaries match the proposed lotting in the subject land division applications (refer to Exhibit 5). Zoning By-law Amendment 8021/23 accommodated the zoning standards from the City initiated Infill and Replacement By-laws, which at that time were approved by City Council but were appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal. The Ontario Land Tribunal approved the By-laws without amendment on September 5, 2023. Comments Official Plan The subject lands are designated “Urban Residential Areas – Low Density” in the City of Pickering Official Plan, which permits single-detached dwellings and no more than 30 units per net hectare. The subject lands are located within an Established Neighbourhood Precinct within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood and are subject to the Urban Design Guidelines for Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhood Precincts. The Urban Design Guidelines are intended to assist in reinforcing the sense of character of the proposed Established Neighbourhood Precinct by addressing compatibility of new homes with adjacent, existing houses, as well as the streetscape. Staff have reviewed and confirmed that the intent of the land division applications conform to the Official Plan, as they facilitate a detached residential dwelling use of no more than 24 units per net hectare. Under the Zoning By-law Amendment Application Number A 01/21, staff assessed and concluded that the proposed dwelling unit sizes and lotting were appropriate for the Established Neighbourhood Precinct within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood. Under the subject land division applications, the proposed lot sizes and orientations have not changed, and staff maintain there are no issues with the proposed lot sizes and orientation. Zoning By-law The subject lands are zoned “R4-25” to “R4-28” in Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-laws 7872/21, 7873/21, 7900/22, and 8021/23. Zoning By-law 8021/23 provides the permitted lot area and lot frontage requirements for each lot: Lots R-Plan Part No. Zone Required Lot Area (m2) Proposed Lot Area (m2) Required Lot Frontage (m) Proposed Lot Frontage (m) Lot 1 Parts 2 & 5 R4-25 500.0 508.3 14.0 15.13 Lot 2 Parts 3 & 6 R4-26 350.0 359.4 11.0 12.08 Lot 3 Parts 4 & 7 R4-27 400.0 405.6 16.0 19.75 -51- Report LD 02/24 to LD 04/24 April 10, 2024 Page 3 Lots R-PlanPart No.Zone Required Lot Area (m2) Proposed Lot Area (m2) Required Lot Frontage (m) Proposed Lot Frontage (m) Retained Lot Part 8 R4-28 350.0 384.1 12.0 12.0 The proposed lots comply with minimum lot frontage and lot area requirements of the Zoning By-law and staff are satisfied that the proposed severances are appropriate. Input From Other Sources Building Services •No comments on the applications. Paal Helgesson, Division Head, Water Resources & Development Services •Previous Engineering Comments fromZoning By-law Amendment ApplicationNo. A 01/21 have been attached for theapplicant’s reference (refer to Exhibit 6). •Conditions for approval are attached (referto Appendix II). Region of Durham •At the time of writing this report, the Region of Durham has not provided commentsand/or conditions. These will be forwardedto the applicant and Committee as theybecome available. Toronto & Region Conservation Authority •No objection to the approval of the subject land division applications. Date of report: April 4, 2024 Comments prepared by: Original Signed By Liam Crawford Planner II Original Signed By Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration LC:jc J:\Documents\Development\D-3500 Consents, Severances (LD Applications)\2024\LD 02-24 to LD 04-24\8. Report\Report LD 02-24 to LD 04-24.doc Attachments -52- Appendix I April 10, 2024 Recommended Conditions of Approval for Consents LD 02/24 to LD 04/24 The City Development Department has reviewed the above application and provides the following conditions: 1. Submit one copy of a Deposited Reference Plan which confirms the dimensions and lot areas of the proposed retained and severed parcels located on the properties. 2. Obtain a Building Permit from the City’s Building Services Section for the removal of any existing structure(s) on the severed parcel(s) (including the detached dwelling), or that straddle both the retained and severed parcel(s) and that all inspections are complete (when buildings/structures are required to be removed). 3. Provide a certified cheque, made payable to the City of Pickering for cash-in lieu of parkland for each newly created lots. The parkland fee shall be in accordance with the City’s General Municipal Fees By-law in existence at the date of such payment (the current amount is $7,635.00 per each newly created lot). 4. Coordinate with the City of Pickering, City Development Department to assign an appropriate municipal address for the retained and severed parcels. 5. Provide an acknowledgement that Section 50(3) of the Planning Act shall apply to any subsequent conveyance. Upon fulfillment of these conditions the applicant must submit a cheque payable to the City of Pickering in the amount of $1,110.00 for the stamping of the deed package, to be prepared and submitted by a lawyer. -53- Memo To: Liam Crawford April 3, 2024 Planner II From: Paal Helgesen Division Head, Water Resources & Development Services Copy: Manager, Zoning & Administration Project Manager, Development Approvals Subject: Land Division Application LD 02/2024 to 04/2024 - Gordon Edmiston - 1279 & 1281 Commerce Street File: D-4400 Water Resources & Development Services has reviewed the above application and provide the following conditions: 1. We have reviewed the draft reference (40R) plan and find it to be acceptable. The plan can be deposited at the Land Registry Office (LRO). 2. The 5.0m daylighting triangle, indicated as Part 1 on the draft reference plan, is to be dedicated to the City and established as public highway. 3. The applicant will be required to provide an Engineering Review Fee of $1,700.00 for the four proposed lots, and a fee of $2,265.00 for the clearance of Water Resources & Development Services conditions. A cheque, payable to the City of Pickering, in the amount of $3,965.00 will be required. 4. As a condition of severance, the applicant must pay to the City $315.14 ($2,475.00/hectare) for their Stormwater Maintenance Fee. 5. A Road Cut Degradation Fee of $42.00/m2 will be required based on the area of asphalt cut to install the proposed sanitary and water service connections. 6. The applicant will be required to provide cash-in-lieu payment to the City for the quality control of the runoff from site. The fee is based on $52,530.00 per impervious hectare and will be determined once the impervious area is calculated from the Stormwater Management (SWM) report. 7. A preliminary grading and drainage plan will be required as a condition of severance. It must contain sufficient information regarding existing and proposed grades such that it can be adequately determined that development of this property will not adversely affect adjacent properties. The plan must illustrate Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Measures for the proposed lots, including, but not limited to, amended topsoil, -54- April 3, 2024 Page 2 of 3 Land Division Application LD 02/2024 to 04/2024 permeable pavers on the driveway, infiltration galleries, and rain gardens. The plan should indicate existing vegetation/trees within and adjacent to the property that may be affected. The plan should indicate the proposed driveway locations and existing utilities within the boulevard. Relocation of utilities will be the applicant’s responsibility. 8. The City requires a stormwater management brief to be submitted for review. The brief shall address the following design criteria: • There is no storm sewer system for this application therefore drainage must be conveyed overland. • Basements are not acceptable due to the lack of municipal services. • The proponent must demonstrate no negative impacts to the surrounding properties. • The pre-development flow shall be determined using “old” IDF parameters (a=2464, b=16, c=1) and a pre-development (existing) runoff coefficient. • All proposed LID measures shall be located within private property. Homeowners shall be responsible for future maintenance of the LID measures. A Section 119 Restrictive Covenant is to be registered on title prohibiting the alteration or removal of the LID measures. • All roof leaders shall be directly connected to rain barrels with overflow to an amended topsoil surface of 450mm depth to satisfy the erosion control. • A minimum 450mm depth of amended soils should be specified for all grassed areas such as back yards, front yards, and side yards. Add appropriate notes on the Site Grading Plan. • Quality control will be satisfied through a cash-in-lieu payment due to site constraints. 9. A Geotechnical Report is required. 10. A Tree Inventory and Protection/Removal Plan, prepared by a qualified Arborist or an Environmental Consultant is required. This information should address matters such as existing tree species, diameter, health, protection/removal strategies, and a proposed replanting plan. Compensation for loss of tree canopy will be required and is over and above any required boulevard tree as per the Boulevard Tree Planting Program. 11. Planting of one boulevard tree is required for each new lot being created. Where the planting of a boulevard tree is not possible, cash-in-lieu is to be provided as per the current Development Services Fee Schedule. A Tree Inventory and Protection/Removal Plan, prepared by a qualified Arborist or an Environmental Consultant is required. This information should address matters such as existing tree species, diameter, health, protection/removal strategies, and a proposed replanting plan. Compensation for loss of -55- April 3, 2024 Page 3 of 3 Land Division Application LD 02/2024 to 04/2024 tree canopy will be required and is over and above any required boulevard tree as per the Boulevard Tree Planting Program. 12. The applicant must satisfy and address all comments with the associated Zoning By-law Amendment application (A01/21). See attached the comment letter for your reference. PH:tj Attachment: ZBA (A01/21) Comment Letter – Submission 2 -56- Liv e r p o o l R o a d Do u g l a s A v e n u e Browning Avenue Ilona Park Road Fa i r v i e w A v e n u e Annland Street F r o n t R o a d Luna Court Monica Cook Place Commerce Street Broadview Street Wharf Street Pl e a s a n t S t r e e t Old Orchard Avenue ProgressFrenchman'sBay East Park Frenchman's BayRate PayersMemorial Park Location MapFile:Applicant:Municipal Address: LD 02/24 to LD 04/24 Date: Mar. 15, 2024 ¯ E G. Edmiston 1279 & 1281 Commerce Street SubjectLands L:\PLANNING\01-MapFiles\LD\2024\LD 02-2024to04 G. Edminston\LD 02-42to04-24_LocationMap.mxd 1:4,000 SCALE:THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. © The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: © King's Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; © His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, Department ofNatural Resources. All rights reserved.; © Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers. All rights reserved.; © Municipal PropertyAssessment Corporation and its suppliers. All rights reserved. City DevelopmentDepartment -57- Ex h i b i t 2 Su b m i t t e d P l a n Fi l e No : LD 02/24 Ap p l i c a n t : G. E d m i s t o n Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 12 7 9 & 1 2 8 1 C o m m e r c e S t r e e t CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : Ap r i l 4, 2 0 2 4 LD 0 2/2 0 2 4 Co n s e n t t o s e v e r a 5 0 8 . 3 s q u a r e me t r e p a r c e l o f l a n d ( P a r t s 2 & 5 ) , re t a i n i n g a 1 , 1 4 9 . 1 s q u a r e m e t r e pa r c e l o f l a n d ( P a r t s 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 , & 8) . Re t a i n e d Pa r c e l (1 , 1 4 9 . 1 m 2) Se v e r e d Pa r c e l (5 0 8 . 3 m 2) Co m m e r c e S t r e e t -58- Ex h i b i t 3 Su b m i t t e d P l a n Fi l e N o : LD 03/2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : G. E d m i s t o n Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 12 7 9 & 1 2 8 1 C o m m e r c e S t r e e t CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : Ap r i l 4, 2 0 2 4 LD 0 3/2 4 Co n s e n t t o s e v e r a 3 5 9 . 4 s q u a r e me t r e r e s i d e n t i a l p a r c e l o f l a n d (P a r t s 3 & 6 ) , r e t a i n i n g a 78 9 . 7 sq u a r e m e t r e r e s i d e n t i a l pa r c e l o f l a n d ( P a r t s 4 , 7 & 8) . Re t a i n e d Pa r c e l (78 9 . 7 m2) Se v e r e d Pa r c e l (35 9 . 4 m2) Co m m e r c e S t r e e t -59- Ex h i b i t 4 Su b m i t t e d P l a n Fi l e N o : LD 04 /2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : G. E d m i s t o n Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 12 7 9 & 1 2 8 1 C o m m e r c e S t r e e t CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : Ap r i l 4, 2 0 2 4 LD 0 4/2 4 Co n s e n t t o s e v e r a 4 0 5 . 6 s q u a r e me t r e r e s i d e n t i a l p a r c e l o f l a n d (P a r t s 4 & 7 ) , r e t a i n i n g a 38 4 . 1 s q u a r e m e t r e r e s i d e n t i a l pa r c e l o f l a n d ( P a r t 8 ) . Re t a i n e d Pa r c e l (38 4 . 1 m2) Se v e r e d Pa r c e l (40 5 . 6 m2) Co m m e r c e S t r e e t -60- Ex h i b i t 5 Su b m i t t e d P l a n Fi l e N o : LD 02 / 2 4 t o L D 04 /2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : G. E d m i s t o n Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 12 7 9 & 1 2 8 1 Co m m e r c e S t r e e t CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : Ap r i l 4, 2 0 2 4 Re t a i n e d Pa r c e l (38 4 . 1 m2) Co m m e r c e S t r e e t Lo t # 3 (40 5 . 6 m2) Lo t # 2 (35 9 . 4 m2) Lo t # 1 (50 8 .3 m2) -61- Memo To: Isabel Lima December 20, 2022 Planner II From: Richard Holborn Director, Engineering Services Copy: (Acting) Division Head, Water Resources & Development Services Manager, Capital Projects & Infrastructure Manager, Landscape & Parks Development Project Manager, Development Approvals Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A01/21 – 2nd Submission -5968567 Ontario Inc. -1279 & 1281 Commerce Street File: D-3300 The Engineering Services Department has reviewed the documents submitted in support of the above application and comment as follows: We have no objections to the Zoning By-law Amendment Application. The following comments must be addressed at the detailed design stage. Please ensure the first detailed design submission includes a letter re-stating the City’s comment followed by an appropriate response, immediately afterwards, outlining how the proponent addressed the comment. Development Services General Comments 1.The applicant will be required to enter into a Development Agreement as a condition of the future severance application. The agreement will cover items including, but not limited to, tree planting and/or compensation, boulevard restoration, road restoration, curb restoration, etc. Site Plan – Dwg. A101 2.Include a legend on the plan. The legend is to include all surface materials, existing and proposed trees, and any existing or proposed utilities within the boulevards. 3.City of Pickering Engineering Design Guidelines require a minimum 0.6m undisturbed strip around the property. Indicate all setbacks on the plan to clearly illustrate that this requirement can be met. Exhibit 6 -62- December 20, 2022 Page 2 of 4 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A01/21 – 2nd Submission 4. Review the proposed driveways for maneuverability. It may be difficult for a vehicle to access the side of the garage that is not inline with the driveway entrance at the curb. 5. Review the driveway for dwelling 01. The driveway must provide sufficient space for a vehicle to park fully within the lot and not within the boulevard. The driveway for this lot provides approximately three metres within the lot, which would not meet this requirement. Functional Servicing Report 6. Section 7.1.2 and Figure 3 indicate that an interceptor swale will be located on the east property line. This swale is to be located entirely on the subject property, outside of the aforementioned 0.6m undisturbed strip, unless written permission is obtained from the adjacent property owner. 7. Additional Construction Management information will be required, as per City of Pickering Engineering Design Guidelines. Requirements are located on the City’s website. 8. The following comments relate to the Functional Servicing and Grading Plan: a. All lot grading is to comply with City of Pickering standards of between 2% and 5% with the difference taken up by 3:1 slopes. b. The rear yard of Lot H03 incorrectly identifies a high point of 78.50. Revise as required. c. Provide a consistent grade from the garage to the curb for each lot. d. All rear yard grading aprons are to be located a minimum of 5.0m from the house. e. Provide cross sections for the east and south property lines. f. Indicate the locations of existing curb depressions on the north side of Commerce Street. g. All curb cuts/infills are to be completed by the City at the owner’s expense. Include a note on the plan regarding this requirement. h. Ensure all symbols on the plan match the corresponding symbol in the legend. Landscape Planting Plan 9. Include Tree Protection Notes (P-1101) on the plan. A copy is attached for your reference. -63- December 20, 2022 Page 3 of 4 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A01/21 – 2nd Submission Subsurface Soil and Infiltration Investigation Report 10. The report is to be signed and sealed by the professional certifying the work. Water Resources Comments 1. Information provided in the Functional Servicing Report indicates that the post- development flows will exceed the pre-development levels. In order to mitigate/reduce the flow exceedances and address erosion control requirements, low impact development measures, such as, rain gardens, rain barrels and permeable pavers shall be included in the design. Refer to the Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Planning and Design Guide (CVC, TRCA, 2010) for details. 2. A minimum 450mm depth of amended soils should be specified for all grassed areas such as back yards, front yards and side yards. Add appropriate notes on a Site Grading Plan. Capital Projects General Comments 1. Comment 1 from our previous memo dated May 27, 2021 has not been addressed. All boulevards are to be graded with positive drainage, between 2% and 5%, to the street. The proposed 3:1 sloping within the Commerce Street boulevard at Dwelling H01 will not be permitted. 2. Review the overall grading of the site to ensure generally matches the existing grades, and that it is not being falsely raised, thereby negatively impacting adjacent properties. 3. Pedestrian connections directly to the street will not be permitted. Revise the pedestrian connections for H01 and H04 to connect to the driveways. 4. Provide a 5.0m daylighting triangle at the corner of Commerce Street and Front Road. These lands are to be conveyed to the City of Pickering. Provide a draft reference plan for our review with the next submission. 5. Provide restoration notes for the Front Road and Commerce Street right-of-ways. Individual restorations for each sanitary service connection may not be permitted. Further comments on restoration will be provided with the detailed design. Traffic Comments 6. The aforementioned 5.0m daylighting triangle will provide clear sight lines for the intersection of Commerce Street and Front Road. This will address our previous comment. -64- December 20, 2022 Page 4 of 4 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A01/21 – 2nd Submission Landscape & Parks Development 1. A revised landscape plan has been provided, indicating a total of 13 proposed trees. This number includes the 4 required boulevard trees that do not form part of the tree removal compensation, leaving 9 trees that could be applied to the compensation requirement of 11 trees. Since there is not sufficient room to plant the last 2 trees required for compensation, cash-in-lieu can be paid for these trees at a rate of $550.00 each. PH:lc Attachments P-1101 – Tree Protection Notes -65-