Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApril 26, 2021Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca Due to COVID-19 and the Premier’s Emergency Orders to limit gatherings and maintain physical distancing, the City of Pickering continues to hold electronic Council and Committee Meetings. Members of the public may observe the meeting proceedings by viewing the livestream. A recording of the meeting will also be available on the City’s website following the meeting. Page 1.Roll Call 2.Invocation Mayor Ryan will call the meeting to order and lead Council in the saying of the Invocation. 3.Indigenous Land Acknowledgment Statement Mayor Ryan will read the Indigenous Land Acknowledgment Statement. 4.Disclosure of Interest 5.Adoption of Minutes In Camera Council Minutes, March 22, 2021 Under Separate Cover Council Minutes, March 22 1 Special Council Minutes, March 30, 2021 (Confidential Special Council Minutes, March 30, 2021, provided under separate cover) 39 Executive Committee Minutes, April 6, 2021 42 Planning & Development Committee Minutes, April 6, 2021 48 6.Presentations 7.Delegations Due to COVID-19 and the Premier’s Emergency Orders to limit gatherings and maintain physical distancing, members of the public may provide a verbal delegation to Members of Council via electronic participation. To register as a delegate, visit www.pickering.ca/delegation, and complete the on-line delegation form or email clerks@pickering.ca. Delegation requests must be received by noon on the last business day before the scheduled meeting. All delegations for items not listed on the agenda shall register ten (10) days prior to the meeting date. Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca The list of delegates who have registered to speak will be called upon one by one by the Chair and invited to join the meeting via audio connection. A maximum of 10 minutes shall be allotted for each delegation. Please ensure you provide the phone number that you wish to be contacted on. Please be advised that your name and address will appear in the public record and will be posted on the City’s website as part of the meeting minutes. 7.1 Donna McFarlane, Senior Advisor, Durham Region Hospice Eva Reti, Chair, VON Durham Community Corporation Board Re: Update on the Durham Region Hospice - Comfort, Care and Compassion Capital Campaign 7.2 Andrew Scott , Associate Land Development Manager – GTE Division Mattamy Homes Re: Report PLN 17-21 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2019-03 Draft Plan of Condominium Application CP-2019-04 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 13/19 10046043 Canada Inc. & C. Wang Lots 14, 29 and 30, Part of Lots 22 to 26 Plan 818, Part 4 of 40R-29018, Part 1 of 40R-29545, Part 2 of 40R-30489 and Part 1 of 40R-30492 (1950 and 1952 Fairport Road) 7.3 Gena Chang-Campbell, Chair, Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce Catherine Mosca, Vice Chair, Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce Re: Report CS 22-21 Pickering Ant-Black Racism Taskforce Terms of Reference 7.4 George Stergiou Re: Property Standards Claim -Failure to Repair a Retaining Wall that is Breaking Down a Fence and Impacting Multiple Neighbours 7.5 Rick Perotto, Vice President of Business Development David Hardy, Vice President, Sustainability & Stakeholder Affairs William F. White International Inc. (WFW ) Re: Report PLN 20-21 Lease Agreement for Temporary Use of City Property at 3800 Sideline 32 -William F. White International Inc. – Filming Backlot Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca 7.6 Michael Vani, Senior Planner Weston Consulting Re: Report PLN 22-21 Two-year period Exemption Request for Minor Variance Application P/CA 21/21 Universal City Six Developments Inc. Part of Lot 21, Concession 1 South, Now Part 2, 40R-18785 (1010 Sandy Beach Road) 8.Correspondence 8.1 Corr. 17-21 63 Ralph Walton, Regional Clerk/Director of Legislative Services The Regional Municipality of Durham Re: CP Railway Traffic Information and Data (2021-P-6) Recommendation: That Corr. 17-21, from Ralph Walton, Regional Clerk/Director of Legislative Services, the Regional Municipality of Durham, dated March 25, 2021, regarding the CP Railway Traffic Information and Data (2021-P- 6), be endorsed. 8.2 Corr. 18-21 65 Association of Municipalities Ontario Re: One-Time Doubling of Gas Tax Funds in 2021 Recommendation: 1.That Corr. 18-21, from Association of Municipalities Ontario, dated March 26, 2021, regarding a One-Time Doubling of Gas Tax Funds in 2021, be received; and, 2.That City Staff be directed, through the CAO, to report back on how these additional funds will be applied in the 2021 Capital Budget Year no later than the June 28, 2021 Council Meeting. 8.3 Corr. 19-21 79 Ralph Walton, Regional Clerk/Director of Legislative Services The Regional Municipality of Durham Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca Re: Motion to add Pharmacies in Durham Region to the Government of Ontario’s Pilot Project to Deliver the AstraZeneca Vaccine Recommendation: That Corr. 19-21, from Ralph Walton, Regional Clerk/Director of Legislative Services, the Regional Municipality of Durham, dated March 25, 2021, regarding the Motion to add Pharmacies in Durham Region to the Government of Ontario’s Pilot Project to Deliver the AstraZeneca Vaccine, be endorsed. 8.4 Corr. 20-21 81 Mallory Clyne, Director, Strategic Initiatives Toronto Region Board of Trade Re: Getting On The Right Track: Connecting Communities with Regional Rail Recommendation: That Corr. 20-21, from Mallory Clyne, Director, Strategic Initiatives, Toronto Region Board of Trade, dated March 30, 2021, regarding Getting On The Right Track: Connecting Communities with Regional Rail, be endorsed. 8.5 Corr. 21-21 142 Nathan Cato, Director, Government Affairs Canadian Pacific Re: Rail Traffic Data – Response to the Regional Municipality of Durham Recommendation: 1. That Corr. 21-21, from Nathan Cato, Director, Government Affairs, Canadian Pacific, dated April 7, 2021, regarding the Rail Traffic Data – Response to the Regional Municipality of Durham, be received; and, 2. That Corr. 21-21 be referred to City Development Staff, to adopt the Proximity Guidelines established jointly by the Railway Association of Canada and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities on Planning matters. Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca 8.6 Corr. 22-21 144 Mary Medeiros, City Clerk City of Oshawa Re: Process to Establish the City of Oshawa including the lands in Oshawa operated by Hamilton-Oshawa Port Authority as a Foreign Trade Zone Recommendation: That Corr. 22-21, from Mary Medeiros, City Clerk, City of Oshawa, dated April 8, 2021, regarding the Process to Establish the City of Oshawa including the lands in Oshawa operated by Hamilton-Oshawa Port Authority as a Foreign Trade Zone, be endorsed. 9. Report EC 04-21 of the Executive Committee held on April 6, 2021 Refer to Executive Committee Agenda pages: 9.1 Director, Economic Development & Strategic Projects, Report CAO 03-21 1 Community Partner Membership Agreement - Canadian Centre for Nuclear Sustainability Recommendation: 1. That Report CAO 03-21 regarding the Community Partner Membership Agreement, between Ontario Power Generation Inc. (OPG) and The Corporation of the City of Pickering, be received; 2. That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Community Partner Membership Agreement with Ontario Power Generation set out in Attachment 1 to this Report, subject to minor revisions as may be required by the Chief Administrative Officer, Director, Economic Development & Strategic Projects and the Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor; 3. The City Clerk forward a copy of this Report CAO 03-21 to the Regional Municipality of Durham and Ontario Power Generation; and, Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca 4. That appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the actions necessary to implement the recommendations in this Report. 9.2 (Acting) Director, Community Services, Report CS 15-21 10 Emix Ltd. - Lease Amendment Agreement Recommendation: 1. That Report CS 15-21 respecting the City of Pickering’s Lease Amendment Agreement with Emix Ltd. at 1101 Kingston Road, Suite 280, Pickering, be received; 2. That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Lease Amendment Agreement with Emix Ltd. set out in Attachment 1 to this Report, subject to minor revisions as may be required by the Director, Community Services and the Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor; and, 3. That the appropriate City officials be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. 9.3 Director, Engineering Services, Report ENG 07-21 72 Proposed All-way Stop - William Jackson Drive and Bronzedale Street/Kalmar Avenue Recommendation: 1. That the attached draft by-law be enacted to amend Schedule "7" to By-law 6604/05 to provide for the regulation of stop signs on highways or parts of highways under the jurisdiction of The Corporation of the City of Pickering, specifically to address the proposed installation of an all-way stop control at the intersection of William Jackson Drive and Bronzedale Street/Kalmar Avenue; and, 2. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca 9.4 Director, Engineering Services, Report ENG 08-21 79 Krosno Creek Culvert Replacements – Gas Main Relocations Morden Lane, Reytan Boulevard, and Alyssum Street (including Sandy Beach Road) Recommendation: 1. That the cost proposals for gas main relocations submitted by Enbridge Gas Inc. for; Morden Lane, Reytan Boulevard, and Alyssum Street (including Sandy Beach Road) in the amount of $296,872.94 (HST included) be accepted; 2. That the total net project cost of $294,078.00 (net of HST rebate) for the proposals be approved; 3. That Council authorize the Director, Finance & Treasurer to fund the net project cost of $294,078.00 for the proposals as follows: a) the sum of $152,921.00 by a transfer from Development Charges City’s Share Reserve; b) the sum of $141,157.00 by a transfer from Development Charges-Stormwater Management Reserve Fund; and, 4. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. 9.5 Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor, Report LEG 07-21 84 Property Standards By-law Recommendation: 1. That Report LEG 07-21 regarding the attached Property Standards By-law be received; 2. That Corporate Services staff be directed to work with Corporate Communications staff to conduct a public consultation campaign, to include social media, to seek public and stakeholder input regarding the attached Property Standards By-law; Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca 3. That the Property Standards By-law be presented to Council after completion of the public consultation campaign; and, 4. That appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the actions necessary to implement the recommendations in this Report. 10. Report PD 04-21 of the Planning & Development Committee held on April 6, 2021 Refer to Planning & Development Agenda pages: 10.1 Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor, Report LEG 04-21 23 Orchard Ridge (Pickering) G.P. Inc. – Plan of Subdivision 40M-2536 - Final Assumption of Plan of Subdivision - Lots 1 to 51, Blocks 52 and 53, Plan 40M-2536 Recommendation: 1. That Cliffview Road within Plan 40M-2536 be assumed for public use; 2. That works and services required by the Subdivision Agreement within Plan 40M-2536, which are constructed, installed or located on lands dedicated to, or owned by the City, or on lands lying immediately adjacent thereto, including lands that are subject to easements transferred to the City, be accepted and assumed for maintenance; 3. That Orchard Ridge (Pickering) G.P. Inc. be released from the provisions of the Subdivision Agreement and any amendments thereto relating to Plan 40M-2536; and, 4. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the actions necessary to implement the recommendations in this report. 10.2 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 16-21 26 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2015-03 (R) Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 05/15 (R) Seaton TFPM Inc. Part Lots 17 to 19, Concession 4, Part Lots 17 to 21, Concession 5 Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca Seaton Community Recommendation: 1.That Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2015-03 (R), submitted by Seaton TFPM Inc. on lands being Part Lots 17 to 19, Concession 4, Part Lots 17 to 21, Concession 5, to establish a residential plan of subdivision on the Phase 1A lands consisting of 246 detached dwellings, 92 street townhouses and 15 rear lane townhouses for a total of 353 dwelling units, as shown on Attachment #3 to Report PLN 16-21, and the implementing conditions of approval, as set out in Appendix I, be endorsed; and, 2.That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 05/15 (R), submitted by Seaton TFPM Inc., to implement Phase 1A of Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2015-03(R) on lands being Part Lots 17 to 19, Concession 4, Part Lots 17 to 21, Concession 5, be endorsed subject to the provisions contained in Appendix II to Report PLN 16-21, and that staff be authorized to finalize and forward an implementing Zoning By-law to Council for enactment. 10.3 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 17-21 60 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2019-03 Draft Plan of Condominium Application CP-2019-04 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 13/19 10046043 Canada Inc. & C. Wang Lots 14, 29 and 30, Part of Lots 22 to 26 Plan 818, Part 4 of 40R-29018, Part 1 of 40R-29545, Part 2 of 40R-30489 and Part 1 of 40R-30492 (1950 and 1952 Fairport Road) This matter was referred to Council by the Planning & Development Committee at its meeting held on April 6, 2021. Memorandum from the Director, City Development & CBO Planning & Development Committee Meeting of April 6, 2021 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2019-02 Draft Plan of Condominium Application CP 2019-03 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 13/19 10046043 Canada Inc. & C. Wang Lots 14, 29 and 30, Part of Lots 22 to 26 Plan 818, Part 4 of 40R-29018, Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca Part 1 of 40R-29545, Part 2 of 40R-30489 and Part 1 of 40R-30492 (1950 and 1952 Fairport Road) - REVISED [Refer to Page 187 for the Memorandum and page 361 for the By-law in this agenda] 10.4 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 18-21 101 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 03/21 City Initiated Part of Lot 18, Concession 9 S, Part of Lot 2, Plan 12 (5015 Brock Road) Recommendation: That City Initiated Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 03/21 to amend By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06, to zone lands municipally known as 5015 Brock Road from “Oak Ridges Moraine – General Commercial (ORM-C2)” Zone to “ORM-C2-1” Zone restoring the residential use rights of a maximum of 4 dwelling units, be endorsed, and that the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN18-21 be finalized and forwarded to Council. 10.5 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 19-21 110 Official Plan Amendment OPA 20-005/P Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 09/20 Mattamy (Seaton) Limited Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 3, Now Parts 1 and 2, 40R-24268 and Part of Lot 3, 40R-29614 (1034 Reflection Place) Recommendation: 1.That Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 20-005/P, submitted by Mattamy (Seaton) Limited, to reduce the minimum net residential density from 203 to 70 units per net hectare for the lands located on the southwest corner of Taunton Road and Sapphire Drive to allow a residential condominium development to be approved, and that the draft by-law to adopt Amendment 42 to the Pickering Official Plan as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN 19-21 be forwarded to Council for enactment; and, Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca 2.That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 09/20, submitted by Mattamy (Seaton) Limited, to permit a residential condominium development, be approved, and that the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as set out in Appendix II to Report PLN 19-21 be forwarded to Council. 11.Reports – New and Unfinished Business 11.1 (Acting) Director, Community Services, Report CS 20-21 221 Request for Additional Funding for Consulting Services -CHDRC Generator Replacement Recommendation: 1.That the additional fee proposal and project costs as submitted by TS Engineering Inc. in the gross amount of $84,750.00 (HST included), and the net amount of $76,320.00 (net HST rebate) for the increase in scope of work the replacement of the backup power generator at the Chestnut Hill Developments Recreation Complex (CHDRC), and associated costs, be accepted; 2.That the total estimated consulting costs including the amount referenced in recommendation 1 above, in the amount of $124,819.00, as presented in Table 2, be approved; 3.That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to finance the total net consulting costs of $124,819.00 by undertaking an internal loan for period not exceeding 5 years, and this source be revised up to 100 per cent funding through a transfer from the Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund if deemed eligible by the Association Municipalities of Ontario; and, 4.That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect hereto. 11.2 (Acting) Director, Community Services, Report CS 22-21 225 Pickering Ant-Black Racism Taskforce Terms of Reference Recommendation: Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca 1.That the Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce Terms of Reference, as amended by the Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce in Attachment 1, be endorsed by Council; and, 2.That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. 11.3 Director, Engineering Services, Report ENG 09-21 254 Asphalt Resurfacing on Various City Streets -Tender No. T2021-1 Recommendation: 1.That Tender No. T2021-1 for Asphalt Resurfacing on Various City Streets as submitted by Viola Management Inc. in the total tendered amount of $2,478,485.27 (HST included) be accepted; 2.That Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions be retained to provide materials testing services based on unit rates submitted at an estimated cost of $99,976.75 (HST included) in accordance with Purchasing Policy Item 10.03 (c); 3.That the total gross project cost of $2,880,429.00 (HST included), including the tendered amount, a contingency and other associated costs, and the total net project cost of $2,593,916.00 (net of HST rebate) be approved; 4.That Council authorize the Director, Finance & Treasurer to finance the total net project cost as approved in the 2021 Roads Capital Budget, and the amount be increased from $2,465,000.00 to $2,593,916.00 to be funded by a transfer from the Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund; and, 5.That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. 11.4 Director, Engineering Services, Report ENG 10-21 271 Balsdon Park Reconstruction -Tender No. T2021-7 Recommendation: Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca 1.That Tender No. T2021-7 for Balsdon Park Reconstruction as submitted by Urgiles Bros. Excavating in the total tendered amount of $423,750.00 (HST included) be accepted; 2.That the total gross project cost of $548,050.00 (HST included), including the tendered amount, a contingency and other associated costs, and the total net project cost of $493,536.00 (net of HST rebate) be approved; 3.That Council authorize the Director, Finance & Treasurer to finance the net project cost in the amount of $493,536.00 as follows: a)the sum of $40,000.00 by a transfer from the Public Benefits Reserve Fund; b)the sum of $453,536.00 as approved in the 2021 Parks Capital Budget by a transfer from the Parkland Reserve Fund; and, 4.That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. 11.5 Director, Finance & Treasurer, Report FIN 06-21 282 2021 Tax Rates and Final Tax Due Dates Recommendation: 1.That Report FIN 06-21 of the Director, Finance & Treasurer regarding the 2021 tax rates be received; 2.That the 2021 tax rates for the City of Pickering be approved as contained in Schedule “A” of the By-law attached hereto; 3.That the tax levy due dates for the Final Billing be June 28, 2021 and September 28, 2021 excluding the industrial, multi-residential and commercial realty tax classes; 4.That the attached By-law be approved; 5.That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to make any changes or undertake any actions necessary to comply with Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca Provincial regulations including altering due dates or final tax rates to ensure that the property tax billing process is completed; and, 6.That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary actions to give effect thereto. 11.6 Fire Chief, Report FIR 02-21 288 Supply and Delivery of a Fire Pumper Rescue Replacement -Quotation No. Q2020-5 Recommendation: 1.That RFQ No. Q2020-5 submitted by Safetek for the Supply and Delivery of a Fire Pumper Rescue Replacement project in the amount of $1,045,551.00 (HST included) be accepted; 2.That the total gross project cost of $1,109,961.00 (HST included) and the total net project cost of $999,554.00 (net of HST rebate) be approved; 3.That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to finance the total net project cost in the amount of $999,554.00 as follows: a)the sum of $990,000.00 be financed by the issue of debentures by The Regional Municipality of Durham over a period not to exceed 15 years; b)the sum of $9,554.00 be funded from property taxes; c)the annual repayment charges in the amount of approximately $87,500.00 be included in the annual Current Budget for the City of Pickering commencing 2021, or such subsequent year in which the debentures are issued, and continuing thereafter until the debenture financing is repaid; and, d)the Treasurer be authorized to make any changes, adjustments, and revisions to amounts, terms, conditions, or take any actions necessary in order to effect the foregoing; 4.That the draft by-law attached to this report be enacted; and, Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca 5.That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. 11.7 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 20-21 296 Lease Agreement for Temporary Use of City Property at 3800 Sideline 32 -William F. White International Inc. – Filming Backlot Recommendation: 1.That Report PLN 20-21 from the Director, City Development & CBO regarding a Lease Agreement for Temporary Use of City Property at 3800 Sideline 32 be received for information; 2.That the City of Pickering enter into a Lease Agreement with William F. White International Inc., for the period October 1, 2021 to December 31, 2026, with the option to renew the lease for 2 additional terms of 2 years each; 3.That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Lease Agreement between the City of Pickering and William F. White International Inc. in substantially the form as attached to this report, subject to revisions as may be acceptable to the City Solicitor and the Director, City Development & CBO; and, 4.That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. 11.8 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 21-21 314 Lease Agreement – Open Studio Art Café -Temporary Patio Program – Use of City Owned Lands Recommendation: 1.That Council approve the Draft Lease Agreement for the Temporary Use of City Property adjacent to 617 Liverpool Road, between the City of Pickering and Open Studio Art Café for the period May 1, 2021 to November 30, 2021, as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN 21-21; 2.That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Lease Agreement between the City of Pickering and Open Studio Art Café Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca in the form as appended to this report subject to revisions as may be acceptable to the Chief Administrative Officer, the City Solicitor and the Director, City Development & CBO; and, 3.That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. 11.9 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 22-21 329 Two-year period Exemption Request for Minor Variance Application P/CA 21/21 Universal City Six Developments Inc. Part of Lot 21, Concession 1 South, Now Part 2, 40R-18785 (1010 Sandy Beach Road) Recommendation: That Council grants an exemption in accordance with Section 45 (1.4) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990; c. P.13 as amended, and permit the Committee of Adjustment to consider Minor Variance Application P/CA 21/21, resulting from the further processing of the Site Plan or Building Permit applications submitted by Universal City Six Developments Inc., for lands municipally known as 1010 Sandy Beach Road, before the second anniversary of the day on which an applicant-initiated zoning by-law amendment was enacted for the subject lands. 11.10 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 25-21 338 Valley Plentiful Community Garden -Draft Memorandum of Understanding Recommendation: 1.That Report PLN 25-21 of the Director, City Development & CBO, regarding the Draft Memorandum of Understanding with Valley Plentiful Community Garden, be endorsed; 2.That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Pickering and Valley Plentiful Community Garden Committee, as set out in Attachment #1 of this report, subject to revisions as may be acceptable to the City Solicitor and the Director, City Development & CBO; Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca 3.That the appropriate City staff be directed to take the necessary actions as per the Draft Memorandum of Understanding; and, 4.That staff be directed to report back to Council with recommendations pertaining to a community garden policy. 12.Motions and Notice of Motions 12.1 City of Pickering Lobbyist Register Moved by Councillor Brenner Seconded by Councillor McLean Whereas, it is a municipal government’s duty to make decisions in the public interest; And Whereas, open and unfettered access to municipal government is a vital aspect of local democracy; And Whereas, lobbying public office holders is a legitimate activity; And Whereas, public office holders and the public should be able to know who is attempting to influence the decisions of municipal government; And Whereas, public disclosure of lobbying activity and standards of conduct for lobbyists are important to the integrity of municipal government’s decision making; And Whereas, section 223.9 of the Municipal Act, 2001 authorizes municipalities to establish and maintain a Lobbyist Registry in which registrations and returns filed by persons who lobby municipal public office holders shall be kept; And Whereas, a City of Pickering Lobbyist Registrar will ensure public disclosure of lobbying activities and will oversee the regulation of lobbyists’ conduct resulting in greater public trust through transparency and accountability without impeding access to municipal government; And Whereas, sections 8, 9, 10 and 11 of the Municipal Act, 2001 authorize municipalities to pass by-laws necessary or desirable for Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca municipal purposes, and in particular paragraph 2 of subsection 11(2) authorizes by-laws respecting the accountability and transparency of the municipality and its operations; Now Therefore be it resolved, that the City Clerk be directed to engage the services of the City of Pickering’s Integrity Commissioner to establish a framework for a City of Pickering Lobbyist Registry and report back to Council no later than the September 27, 2021 Council meeting for Council’s consideration. 13.By-laws 13.1 By-law 7835/21 Being a by-law to amend By-law 6604/05 providing for the regulating of traffic and parking, standing and stopping on highways or parts of highways under the jurisdiction of the City of Pickering and on private and municipal property. [Refer to ENG 07-21 and page 77 of the Executive Committee Agenda] 13.2 By-law 7836/21 285 Being a by-law to adopt the estimates of all sums required to be raised by taxation for the year 2021 and to establish the Tax Rates necessary to raise such sums and to establish the final due dates for the residential, pipeline, farm, and managed forest realty tax classes. [Refer to Item 11.5 FIN 06-21] 13.3 By-law 7837/21 294 Being a by-law to authorize the Supply and Delivery of a Fire Pumper Rescue Replacement project in the City of Pickering and the issuance of debentures in the amount of $990,000.00. [Refer to Item 11.6 FIR 02-21] 13.4 By-law 7838/21 343 Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 7364/14, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham, for land at Part Lots 17 to 19, Concession 4, Part Lots 19 to 21, Concession 5, City of Pickering. (A 05/15 (R)) Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca 13.5 By-law 7839/21 347 Being a By-law to adopt Amendment 42 to the Official Plan for the City of Pickering. (OPA 20-005/P) 13.6 By-law 7840/21 356 Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 7364/14, as amended, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham, in Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 3, Now Parts 1 and 2, 40R-24268 and Part of Lot 3, 40R-29614, in the City of Pickering. (A 09/20) 13.7 By-law 7841/21 361 Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 3036, as amended, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham, in Lots 14, 29 and 30, Part of Lots 22 to 26 Plan 818, Part 4 of 40R-29018, Part 1 of 40R-29545, Part 2 of 40R-30489 and Part 1 of 40R- 30492, in the City of Pickering. (A 13/19) 13.8 By-law 7842/21 369 Being a by-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06 to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham for land at Part of Lot 18, Concession 9 S, Part of Lot 2, Plan 12, in the City of Pickering. (A 03/21) 13.9 By-law 7843/21 373 Being a by-law to exempt Block 17, Plan 40M-1827, Pickering, from the part lot control provisions of the Planning Act. 13.10 By-law 7844/21 377 Being a by-law to exempt Block 1, Plan 40M-2692, Pickering, from the part lot control provisions of the Planning Act. 14.Other Business 15.Confirmation By-law Council Meeting Agenda April 26, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca 16.Adjournment Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm Present: Mayor David Ryan Councillors: K. Ashe M. Brenner S. Butt I. Cumming B. McLean D. Pickles Also Present: M. Carpino - Chief Administrative Officer K. Bentley - Director, City Development & CBO P. Bigioni - Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor B. Duffield - (Acting) Director, Community Services J. Eddy - Director, Human Resources J. Hagg - Fire Chief J. Flowers - CEO & Director of Public Libraries, Pickering Public Library R. Holborn - Director, Engineering Services F. Jadoon - Director, Economic Development & Strategic Projects S. Karwowski - Director, Finance & Treasurer S. Cassel - City Clerk C. Rose - Chief Planner J. Halsall - Manager, Budgets & Internal Audit V. Plouffe - Manager, Facilities Capital Projects D. Wylie - Manager, Zoning & Administration T. Ryce - Supervisor, Cultural Services C. Blumenberg - Deputy Clerk T. Bal - Planner Il R. Perera - Committee Coordinator 1. Roll Call The City Clerk certified that all Members of Council were present and participating electronically in accordance with By-law 7771/20. 2. Invocation Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order and led Council in the saying of the Invocation. 3. Indigenous Land Acknowledgment Statement - 1 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm Mayor Ryan read the Indigenous Land Acknowledgment Statement. 4. Disclosure of Interest 4.1 Councillor Brenner declared a conflict of interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, with respect to Report FIN 05-21, 2021 Current and Capital Budgets, as it pertains to salaries and wages for Programs and A nimal Services as he has family members employed in those areas at the City of Pickering. Councillor Brenner did not take part in the discussion or vote on these matters. 4.2 Councillor McLean declared a conflict of interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, with respect to Report FIN 05-21, 2021 Current and Capital Budgets, as it pertains to the Heritage Property Tax Rebate and Grants to Organizations, as he has a family member who owns a heritage home and he i s the Chair of the Pickering Auxiliary Rescue Association (PARA). Councillor McLean did n ot take part in the discussion or vote on these matters. Resolution # 537 /21 Moved by Councillor McLean Seconded by Councillor Butt That the order of the agenda be changed to hear Item 11.1 Report CAO 02-21, immediately following the delegations. Carried 5. Adoption of Minutes Resolution # 538/21 Moved by Councillor Pickles Seconded by Councillor Brenner Council Minutes, February 22, 2021 Executive Committee Minutes, March 1, 2021 Special Council Minutes, March 1, 2021 Planning & Development Committee Minutes, March 1, 2021 Executive Committee Budget Minutes, March 4, 2021 Carried 6. Presentations There were no presentations. - 2 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm 7. Delegations 7.1 Mitch Martin, Inspector of West Division, Durham Regional Police Service Re: Durham Regional Police Service - West Division Community Safety Plan Mitch Martin, Inspector of West Division, Durham Regional Police Service, joined the electronic meeting via audio c onnection to highlight the accomplishments of the Durham Regional Police - West Division Community Safety Plan. Mr. Martin stated that in 2021, DRPS – West Division would commit to improving roadway safety, adding that Provincial Offense Notices for various offenses had increased by 20% from the year prior. Mr. Martin advised that DRPS-West Division was also committed to continuing to implement the property crime reduction strategy, by effecting an increase on break and enter clearance rates, and reducing theft in the City of Pickering, and continuing the success of the Notification of Community Crime (NOCC) program. Mr. Martin advised that there was a drop in residential and commercial theft in 2020, due to the pandemic, and will evaluate how things rebound in the new year. Additionally, Mr. Martin spoke to the violent crime reduction strategy, with a 2021 focus to increase compliance checks, conduct proactive patrols, and continue participation on the CIB/Target Team Violent Crime Reduction Steering Committee. Mr. Martin noted that the aim was to enhance community engagement and service delivery, increase positive police/community relations, and commended the Division for its agility of service to adjust to the COVID-19 Pandemic. He advised that most presentations stopped in March, however officers have shown resilience through the new virtual process, and r egularly present virtually at schools and general meetings. Mr. Martin discussed the West Division equity and diversity working group, which is working towards enhancing the diversity of the Division, and also enhancing communication internally and externally to strengthen the bond in community. He highlighted the work of the field intelligence officer, who ensures information was disseminated to front line officers, and encouraged residents to use technology for help in the community, such as the 211.ca. A brief question and answer period ensued b etween Members of Council and Mitch Martin, Inspector of West Division regarding: • whether speeding, changing rush hours and demands had reduced due to the pandemic. Mr. Martin advised that traffic incidents had reduced in March-April 2020, when t he streets were empty, which had resulted in an increase in pursuits for street racing, noting that traffic incidents slightly increased again. He noted that the Division was well positioned to handle traffic demands when things opened up again; • enforcement efforts increasing by 20% for speeding; and, • preparations to manage the traffic relating to the opening of the Durham Live Casino. - 3 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm 7.2 Carion Fenn, President & CEO, Carion Fenn Foundation Mike Young, Principal, Durham Catholic Virtual Elementary School Re: Durham Kids Health Week - April 18, 2021 – April 24, 2021 Carion Fenn, President & CEO, Carion Fenn Foundation Mike Young, Principal, Durham Catholic Virtual Elementary School joined the electronic meeting via audio connection and highlighted the support available for students in virtual classrooms to stay healthy. Ms. Fenn stated that the Carion Fenn Foundation was a registered Charity established to provide support, education, and resources to individuals impacted by mental health, through a variety of health and wellness programs that are free to the public. Mr. Young noted that Durham Catholic Virtual Elementary School is an online school with over 3,500 enrolled students supported by 117 teachers from junior kindergarten to grade eight. He noted that the virtual school had over 200 members of staff to support students. Ms. Fenn and Mr. Young advised that student health had been a concern in a virtual environment, and celebrating Durham Kids Health Week - April 18, 2021 – April 24, as proclaimed by the City of Pickering, would focus on increasing activities to reduce screen time, educate youth on the importance of proper sleep habits, nutrition, physical activities, and mindfulness to help with cognitive and physical health. Ms. Fenn thanked Council and staff for helping with this initiative and being the first municipality to proclaim Durham Kids Health Week. Ms. Fenn and Mr. Young highlighted Kids Wellness Night, on April 22 from 5pm to 7pm, where students & families of Durham Catholic Virtual Elementary School would be invited to listen and learn about Fitness with Dr. Sal, Physiotherapist & Chiropractor; Music with Brandon Bizior, Joshua Albrecht Artist & Entertainer and Douglas Loyal Singer & Guitarist; Mental Health & Bullying, and Nutrition with Certified Nutritional Practitioner Jayde MacLean at Reclaimed Health. Resolution # 539 /21 Moved by Councillor McLean Seconded by Councillor Brenner That the rules of procedure be suspended to allow a delegation from Chief LaRocca, Mississaugas of Scugog Island First Nation. Carried on a Two-Thirds Vote 7.3 Lisa Dost Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street - 4 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm Lisa Dost, 911 Athol Street, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection to ask Council to revoke the Minister’s Zoning Order (MZO) 607/20 on the Lower Duffins Creek provincially significant wetland, noting that the lands must be protected. She advised that a dollar value cannot be placed on a wetland that had taken hundreds of years to develop. Ms. Dost highlighted the benefits of wetlands, which include the filtering of water, mitigating flooding, providing a habitat for wildlife, and noted that developing the lands may result in water sanitation costs increasing substantially. Ms. Dost also discussed the need for proper public consultation on land use planning decisions. 7.4 Ally Zaheer Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street Ally Zaheer, 1096 Moorelands Crescent, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection and advised that she represented the voice of youth, adding that many residents have demonstrated their opposition to MZO 607/20. She encouraged Council to protect and restore green spaces, noting that the MZO process was not conducive to public consultation and may have been done in a duplicitous manner. Ms. Zaheer advised Council that the public relies on elected officials to guide the public towards becoming a climate resilient community, and that generations to come cannot afford to live with the mistakes of today. Ms. Zaheer spoke in support of the reality of climate change, and how people showed their resilience and came together during a pandemic to create unique solutions to the MZO issue. She asked what it would take for the City to take the same position and hear the voices of the people and admit that the MZO was a mistake and move forward. 7.5 Mike Borie Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street Mike Borie, 1044 Escott Court, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection in an effort to better understand the position of Council to only partially revoke the Minister’s Zoning Order (MZO) 607/20 from the lands located west of Squires Beach Road. Mr. Borie discussed the efforts to re-focus as a community, in a process where there was no formal input from the community on this matter. He spoke to the need for an honest, clear, and transparent process when negotiating all agreements, stating that Amazon had committed money, however there was a lack of foresight from the City which had resulted in negative media attention which would not be conducive to attracting businesses in to the City. Mr. Borie noted that he had sent several emails voicing his opposition to the highly controversial MZO 607/20, and had received no responses from Council and that the recent ecological study and other matters were untrue adding that the Lower - 5 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm Duffins Creek Wetland needed to be protected. He spoke to his experience feeling mislead by Council, and urged Members of Council to understand the implications of any item they vote on. Mr. Borie spoke in opposition to the proposed partial revocation of the MZO, despite all the public objections, and asked that Council revoke the entire MZO to protect the wetlands. 7.6 Trevor Cluthé Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street Trevor Cluthé, 64 Emmett Place, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection and asked that a resolution be passed to revoke the Minister’s Zoning Order (MZO) 607/20 in its entirety. He highlighted the benefits of wetlands such as mitigating floods, purifying drinking water, preventing erosion, and protecting wildlife. Mr. Cluthé spoke to the importance of protecting natural spaces, and noted his disappointment that public and Indigenous People consultation had not occurred. He asked that the entire MZO 607/20 be revoked and subjected to the proper planning pr ocess. 7.7 Leslie Johnston Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street Leslie Johnston w ithdrew her delegation request and did not connect to the electronic Council Meeting to provide her delegation. 7.8 Emma Cunningham Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street Emma Cunningham, Pickering Resident, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection and advised that urban sprawl is negatively impacting green spaces and expressed disappointment that the City would not be able to vie for an Amazon warehouse, however Ms. Cunningham noted that the Amazon warehouse in Peel had a major COVID-19 outbreak, and was also being investigated for potential labour violations. Ms. Cunningham questioned why those lands were chosen, as there are other alternative locations that would not have impacted the wetlands. She advised that Minister’s Zoning Orders should be used with caution, because they by-pass the Planning Act, public consultation, and prevent accountability. Ms. Cunningham noted that the Provincial Government has issued several MZO’s and ordinary citizens have had to take the lead in protecting the environment. Ms. Cunningham noted that less than 2% of the Greater Toronto - 6 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm Area (GTA) wetlands remain, and it is Council’s job to protect the wetlands. She highlighted that the Duffins Creek is home to many endangered species, and urged Council to revoke the entire MZO 607/20. 7.9 Edward Cunningham Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street Edward Cunningham, 1480 Pickering Parkway, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection and spoke to the timeline of events, noting that on May 13, 2020, Pickering City Council unanimously supported the MZO, and on March 12, 2021 the TRCA stated they were bei ng forced to issue a permit under duress. He discussed the extraordinary lengths undergone to receive TRCA approval, and that until City Council rescinds the request, residents would assume that City Council was complicit in allowing land that should be protected to be dev eloped, while stripping the TRCA’s authority on such matters. He asked that Council refrain from supporting similar developments until the Province restores the TRCA’s authority, and to explore revitalizing w etlands and w orking w ith passionate activists. 7.10 Ingrid Mohr Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street Ingrid Mohr, 38 H ook Avenue, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection and referenced the Durham Region Climate Adaptation Plan (CAP), highlighting the message from the former Regional Chair, Roger Anderson. She added that the CAP positioned Durham as a leader in adaptation planning in Canada, and asked Council to reflect on past comments made by Council pertaining to environmental protection. 7.11 Anne Bell Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street Anne Bell, 214 King Street West, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection and spoke on behalf of Ontario Nature, a conservation organization that protects wild species and spaces through conservation, education and public engagement. Ms. Bell noted that she was a champion of wetland conservation and had been documenting wetlands since 1987, which had led to strict preservation of significant wetlands under the Planning Act. She spoke to her shock when the Minister’s Zoning Orders was issued on the Lower Duffins Creek wetlands, and - 7 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm that it contravenes the Provincial Policy Statements (PPS) which provides balanced direction on planning matters, and that all planning ne eds to be consistent with the PPS. Ms. Bell highlighted the benefits of wetlands, which should not be taken for granted and referenced a 2019 report from the Insurance Bureau of Canada on the Options for managing the flood costs, one of which is wetlands. Ms. Bell provided facts from the report, including that wetlands could reduce flooding costs by 38% in urban areas, and noted other benefits of wetlands. She asked Council to take the steps to protect the wetlands, and noted that Amazon realized developing the s ite would not be socially or environmentally acceptable. 7.12 Steve Apostolopoulos, Pickering Developments (Squires) Ira Kagan, Kagan Shastri LLP Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street Steve Apostolopoulos, Pickering Developments (Squires), joined the el ectronic meeting via audio connection and expressed appreciation to Council and their decision making, and stated that they supported the removal of the MZO on the parcel of land west of Squires Beach Road. He stated that difficult decisions had been made but that they were in support of Report CAO 02-21. 7.13 Eileen Higdon Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street Eileen Higdon, Pickering Resident, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection and spoke to her experience leading a group of residents in 1991 to stop the development of 20 town homes and destruction of an eco-system at Frenchman’s Bay. She outlined her objections to the MZO which circumvented the public process, and how it is not subject to LPAT and other planning processes that ensure transparency without overriding Provincial and municipal policies and laws. Ms. Higdon spoke to the importance of Indigenous consultation, and how in her opinion, the MZO overrode the duty to consult the Indigenous Peoples. She also spoke to how wetlands protect people and properties from natural hazards. 7.14 Jill Adams Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street Jill Adams, Pickering Resident joined the electronic meeting via audio connection to urge Council to revoke the Ministers Zoning MZO 607/20 completely. She noted - 8 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm that Council requested the MZO under special circumstances, however, the prospective tenant had now refused to utilize the wetland due to local resistance and adverse media attention. Ms. Adams requested that Pickering Council take the protection of provincially significant wetlands seriously. 7.15 Tim Gray, Environmental Defence Canada Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street Tim Gray, Environmental Defence Canada, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection to speak on behalf of Environmental Defence, a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate, and healthy communities. He asked that the Ministers Zoning Order 607/20 be revoked. Mr. Gray noted that he had been a champion of endangered species protection, and spoke to the value of wetlands. Mr. Gray explained how Provincially significant wetlands are evaluated using a science-based ranking system known as the Ontario Wetland Evaluation System (OWES). He stated that the decision to support an MZO contravenes the City’s Official Plan and requirements of the Provincial Policy Statements and the Planning Act. Mr. Gray noted that there were better suited employment lands for development, and urged Mayor Ryan to ask Minister Clark to remove all lands from the MZO and consider adding additional land to the Greenbelt as part of the expansion process and change the zoning of the lands to be environmentally protected. 7.16 Jeff O’Donnell Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street Jeff O’Donnell, 1295 Wharf Street, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection to ask Council to revoke all lands from Ministers Zoning MZO 607/20, and highlighted the benefits of wetlands. 7.17 Brandon Underwood Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street Brandon Underwood, 1215 Bayly Street, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection and spoke to the benefits of having greenspaces, and noted he will be a first time voter in the 2022 Pickering Municipal Election. Mr. Underwood spoke to how groundwater is important for flood control and other positives like habitat for wildlife and requested that Council do its due diligence and protect the Lower - 9 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm Duffins Creek wetlands. Mr. Underwood noted that the development will provide jobs to the community, however Council should consider the benefits of wetlands and to look at all the facts before making future decisions. 7.18 Leon Emmett Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street Leon Emmett, 288 Brock Street West, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection and expressed support for the comments expressed by the previous delegates and urged Council to make amends with the First Nations and with the Mississaugas of Scugog Island First Nation. 7.19 Christina Vasilevski Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street Christina Vasilevski, 1535 Diefenbaker Court, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection and asked Council to revoke the MZO, and expressed concern over continued insistence of the Provincial government’s use of MZO’s. She spoke to the reputation of Amazon, including n ot following s afety protocols and ensuring employees wellbeing. Ms. Vasilevski noted that the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing should revoke the MZO completely, and to r estrict the use of MZO’s to emergency situations. 7.20 Mara-Elena Nagy Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Stree Mara-Elena Nagy withdrew her delegation prior to the meeting and did not connect to the electronic Council Meeting to provide her delegation. Resolution 540/21 Moved by Councillor Ashe Seconded by Councillor Brenner That Council take a 10 minute recess. Carried Council recessed at 8:40 p.m. and reconvened at 8:50 p.m. - 10 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm Upon reconvening, the City Clerk certified that all Members of Council were once again present and participating electronically in accordance with By-law 7771/20. 7.21 Chief LaRocca, Mississaugas of Scugog Island First Nation Re: Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street Chief Kelly LaRocca , Mississaugas of Scugog Island First Nation, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection and advised she cannot support a partial revocation of an MZO that is unlawful and unconstitutional. Chief LaRocca noted that it is a decision making tool that should only be used in emergencies, adding that the Province did not engage with First Nations, or recognize the treaty rights of the Mississaugas of Scugog Island First Nation. Chief LaRocca noted that Minister Clark and Minister Yakabuski did not properly consult with First Nations, and spoke to the Toronto Conservation Authority issuing the permit under duress. She expressed her continued opposition to the development, and that acceptance should be conditional on mitigation efforts to ensure the proposed development would not have negative impacts on natural heritage features. Chief LaRocca opposes the partial continuance of the MZO due to lack of mitigation efforts on the wetlands, and asked that it be revoked in its entirety. 11. Reports – New and Unfinished Business 11.1 Chief Administrative Officer, Report CAO 02-21 Request for Partial Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 - Lands Located West of Squires Beach Road, North of Bayly Street A question and answer period ensued between Members of Council and Staff regarding: • clarification on the revoking of the Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 from the lands located west of Squires Beach Road and what steps were being taken to protect the lands on the east side of Squires Beach Road and the Notion Road Bridge. Staff confirmed that the lands would revert to “UR” – Urban Reserve, as identified in the City’s Zoning By-Law and there would be limited permissible uses; • whether dialogue had occurred with the TRCA regarding the lands on the east side with staff advising that they had spoken with the CEO of the TRCA, and that they are supportive of the decision of Council and comfortable with Report CAO 02-21; • whether efforts on maintaining water flow and storm water management would be addressed, with Catherine. Rose, Chief Planner, advising t hat any - 11 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm issues would be addressed during the site plan review process, and that there had not been any major red flags in the process thus far; • whether zoning was already in place on the East Side of Squires Beach Road, and whether the Ministers Zoning Order amendment would recognize the provincially significant wetlands. Staff advised that the MZO would protect the Lower Duffins Creek Significant Wetlands, and that the Minister Zoning order on the East Side recognized the provincially significant wetlands in a natural heritage open space category; • how the urban reserve zoning w ould only permit, outdoor recreation uses without buildings or structures; preservation and conservation of the natural environment, soil and wildlife; or existing lawful uses located on the land, or in existing buildings or structures, and that it would not hinder film studio moving forward; • the importance of protecting the lands located west of Squires Beach Road; • how the proposed development on the lands located east of Squires Beach Road would create jobs, and that the MZO on those lands is needed to eliminate the requirement for a Church Street/Hwy 401 exit, due to a previous OMB Hearing decision; • recognition of the hundreds of emails, advocacy and passion of the community on this issue; • status of the site plan application, with staff noting it has been reviewed and building permit applications have been received by the City; and, • the importance of working with t he TRCA going forward to ensure there would not be any adverse impact to the environment and natural heritage features with staff noting that the process going forward would involve TRCA through the typical process. It was requested that staff reach out to Chief LaRocca and the First Nations as part of the consultation process for the Site Plan application for the parcel on the east side of Squires Beach Road as well as for the Notion Road Bridge. Resolution # 540/21 Moved by Councillor Brenner Seconded by Councillor Pickles 1. That the letter to Mayor Ryan, from the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, dated March 12, 2021, asking if the City would like the Minster to consider amending Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 to exclude the portion of the lands that would allow for the construction of a distribution centre, be received; 2. That the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing be requested to revoke Minister’s Zoning Order 607/20 from the lands located west of Squires Beach Road, municipally known as 1802 Bayly Street, in the City of Pickering; - 12 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm 3. That the Mayor be authorized to write to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, in response to the Minister’s letter, to make the formal request on behalf of Council; and, 4. That Council’s resolution on this matter be forwarded to: the Pickering-Uxbridge MPP, the Honourable Peter Bethlenfalvy; the MPP for Ajax, the Honourable Rod Phillips; the Region of Durham; the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority; and Triple P roperties. Carried Unanimously on a Recorded Vote 8. Correspondence 8.1 Corr. 15-21 Elizabeth Harvey, Director, Intergovernmental Relations Métis Nation of Ontario Re: Delegation Provided by David Grey Eagle at the January 25, 2021 Pickering Council Meeting Resolution # 541 /21 Moved by Councillor Cumming Seconded by Councillor Butt That Corr. 15-21, from Elizabeth Harvey, Director, Intergovernmental Relations, Métis Nation of Ontario, dated March 1, 2021, regarding the delegation provided by David Grey Eagle at the January 25, 2021 Pickering Council Meeting, be received for information. Carried 8.2 Corr. 16-21 Lisa Brancaccio, Age-Friendly Communities Knowledge Broker Seniors Health Knowledge Network Re: Creating a More Inclusive Ontario - Age-Friendly Community Planning Guide for Municipalities and Community Organizations Resolution # 542/21 Moved by Councillor Brenner Seconded by Councillor Cumming - 13 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm 1. That Corr. 16-21, from Lisa Brancaccio, Age-Friendly Communities Knowledge Broker, Seniors Health Knowledge Network, dated March 16, 2021, regarding Creating a More Inclusive Ontario - Age-Friendly Community Planning Guide for Municipalities and Community Organizations, be received for information; and, 2. That Corr. 16-21 be referred to the CAO to direct the Staff Lead for Age Friendly Communities to review it within the context of the 2021 Business Plan for this initiative. Carried 9. Report EC 03-21 of the Executive Committee held on March 1, 2021 9.1 Director, Engineering Services, Report ENG 03-21 Integrated Transportation Master Plan Study Council Decision: 1. That the Draft Integrated Transportation Master Plan prepared by IBI Group dated January 2021 be endorsed in principle; 2. That the recommendations from the Draft Integrated Transportation Master Plan be considered, along with all other municipal priorities, through future annual municipal plans and budget processes; and, 3. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. 9.2 (Acting) Director, Community Services, Report CS 13-21 Cultural Strategic Plan- Mid-term Update Council Decision: 1. That Report CS 31-20 regarding the City of Pickering’s Cultural Strategic Plan Mid-term Update be received for information; and, 2. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. 9.3 Director, Engineering Services, Report ENG 04-21 Beachfront Park Rehabilitation & Needs Assessment - Public Engagement Work Plan and Project Status Update Council Decision: - 14 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm 1. That Report ENG 04-21 regarding a Public Engagement Work Plan and Project Status Update for Beachfront Park, as a follow-up to Report ENG 12-20 and in response to Resolution #465/20, be received for information; 2. That the Draft Concept Plans attached to Report ENG 04-21 be used to commence the public engagement and consultation process to arrive at a final preferred concept plan for Council endorsement through a future report; 3. That staff be directed to report back with a status update on the Beachfront Park Rehabilitation & Needs Assessment Project no later than the third quarter of 2021; and, 4. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. 9.4 Director, Engineering Services, Report ENG 05-21 Automated Speed Enforcement Implementation Council Decision: 1. That the automated speed enforcement program as outlined in Report ENG 05-21 be endorsed by Council for implementation in 2021 subject to budget approval; 2. That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the required agreements for operation of the program in a form satisfactory to the Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor, the Director, Finance & Treasurer, and the parties, namely: a. Redflex Traffic Systems (Canada) Limited; b. The Ministry of Transportation, Ontario; and, c. The City of Toronto; 3. That one automated speed enforcement mobile camera be installed in the Community Safety Zone on Liverpool Road between Bayly Street and Wharf Street, consistent with Resolution #364/20, as part of the initial rollout of the program and that additional mobile cameras be added as approved funds permit; - 15 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm 4. That Council request the Province of Ontario to permit the use of an Administrative Monetary Penalty System for offenses issued by Automated Speed Enforcement; 5. That staff be directed to report back on the status of the Automated Speed Enforcement Implementation program no later than the end of June, 2021; and, 6. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. 9.5 Director, Finance & Treasurer, Report FIN 03-21 Statement of the Treasurer Respecting 202 0 Remuneration and Expenses of Members of Council and Council Appointees to Boards, Agencies and Committees Council Decision: It is recommended that Report FIN 03-21 of the Director, Finance & Treasurer regarding the Statement of the Treasurer respecting Remuneration and Expenses of Members of Council and Council Appointees for the year 2020 be received for information. 9.6 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 08-21 2020 Sustainable Pickering Year-in-Review Council Decision: That Report PLN 08-21 of the Director, City Development & CBO, on the release of the 2020 Sustainable Pickering Year-in-Review, be received for information. Resolution # 543/21 Moved by Councillor Pickles Seconded by Councillor Brenner That Report EC 03-21 of the Executive Committee Meeting held on March 1, 2021 be adopted. Carried 10. Report PD 03-21 of the Planning & Development Committee held on March 1, 2021 10.1 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 09-21 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 04/17 - 16 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm Request for Red-Line Revision of Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R) 1133373 Ontario Inc. and Lebovic Enterprises Limited Part of Lot 22, 23, 24 & 25, Concession 4 Seaton Community City of Pickering Council Decision: 1. That the Revision to Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R) submitted by 1133373 Ontario Inc., to permit a red-line revision to a draft approved plan of subdivision on lands being Part of Lots 22, 23, 24 & 25 C oncession 4, as shown on the Applicant’s Revised Plan Attachment #2 to Report PLN 09- 21, be endorsed; 2. That the proposed amendments to the conditions of draft plan of subdivision approval to implement Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R) as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN 09-21 be endorsed; 3. That the Local Planning A ppeal Tribunal be advised of City Council’s decision on the request for a red-line revision to Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R) and that the City Solicitor be authorized to attend any Local Planning Appeal Tribunal hearing on the requested red-line revision; and, 4. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 04/17, submitted by 1133373 Ontario Inc. and Lebovic Enterprises Limited, to implement the red-line revision to Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R), and rezone a remnant block of land at 1255 Whitevale Road for Community Node uses be approved, and the draft zoning by-law contained in Appendix II to Report PLN 09-21 be finalized and forwarded to Council for enactment. 10.2 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 11-21 Pickering Housing Strategy Study - Status Update Council Decision: That Report PLN 11-21 of the Director, City Development & CBO, providing an update on the status of the City of Pickering Housing Strategy Study, be received for information. 10.3 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 12-21 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 12/18 Stuart Mark Golvin and JMPM Holdings Ltd. Part of Lot 19, Range 3, B.F.C., Part 1, 40R-8832 and Part 1, 40R-10527 (1635 Bayly Street) - 17 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm Council Decision: That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 12/18, submitted by Stuart Mark Golvin and JMPM Holdings Ltd., to permit “animal boarding establishment”, “auction and estate sales house”, “day care centre”, and other site-specific modifications to By-law 6974/09, as amended, on the lands municipally known as 1635 Bayly Street, be approved, and that the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN 12-21 be finalized and forwarded to Council. Resolution # 544/21 Moved by Councillor Pickles Seconded by Councillor Brenner That Report PD 03-21 of the Planning & Development Committee Meeting held on March 1, 2021 be adopted. Carried 11. Reports – New and Unfinished Business 11.2 Director, Finance & Treasurer, Report FIN 04-21 2021 Current Budget and Financial Statements Excluded Expenses Reporting as Required by Ontario Regulation 284/09 Resolution # 545/21 Moved by Councillor Butt Seconded by Councillor Cumming It is recommended that Report FIN 04-21 of the Director, Finance & Treasurer regarding the exclusion of certain expenses from the 2021 Budget be adopted in accordance with the provisions of Ontario Regulation 284/09 of the Municipal Act, 2001. Carried 11.3 Director, Finance & Treasurer, Report FIN 05-21 2021 Current & Capital Budget Mayor Ryan thanked staff for their efforts in delivering the 2021 budget, with the lowest tax rate increase in decades. Resolution # 546/21 - 18 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm Moved by Councillor Ashe Seconded by Councillor Cumming 1. That Report FIN 05-21 of the Director, Finance & Treasurer be approved; 2. That the following budget recommendations be approved; a) That the 2021 Current Budget expenditure for personnel costs, consisting of salaries and wages (Account 1100), overtime (Account 1200) and employer contributions (Account 1400), excluding Cost Centres 2712 and 2293, in the total amount of $60,364,218 be approved; i) That the 2021 Current Budget for Cost Centre 2712 (Programs) expenditure for personnel costs, consisting of salaries and wages (Account 1100), overtime (Account 1200) and employer contributions (Account 1400) in the total amount of $1,137,031 be approved; and, (ii) That the 2021 Current Budget for Cost Centre 2293 (Animal Services) expenditure for personnel costs, consisting of salaries and wages (Account 1100), overtime (Account 1200) and employer contributions (Account 1400) in the total amount of $506,210 be approved; b) That the 2021 General Government Budget for grant expenditures in the total amount of $184,068 be approved; c) That the Heritage Property Tax Rebate in the amount of $10,000 be approved; d) That the 2021 Gross Current Budget expenditures for City purposes in the amount of $54,684,613 (excluding personnel costs, grant expenditures and Heritage Property Tax Rebate) less estimated current revenues of $47,004,304 (City revenues of $40,667,304 plus $4,000,000 for estimated casino gaming revenue, $2,037,000 for assessment growth plus supplementary taxes of $300,000), less Phase One and Phase Two Safe Restart Funding of $2,802,100 and net transfer from the Rate Stabilization Reserve of $1,500,000 for City operations be approved; e) That the $4,000,000 in estimated casino gaming revenues be transferred to the newly established Casino Reserve; - 19 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm f) That the Capital from Current expenditure in the amount of $731,660 funded from property taxes be approved; and, g) That the total final City levy under paragraphs a), b), c), d) and e) above, plus the following additions that result in a total final levy of $70,841,695 being an increase of approximately 1.45 percent over the 2020 Budget, be approved: i) Hiring of three additional firefighters ($283,000) for the Seaton fire station; and, ii) Service level increases that consist of $51,000 for additional staffing for seasonal By-law enforcement at the waterfront and parks, an investment of $121,300 for the City to meet provincially legislated accessibility requirements and $75,000 to establish a Community Investment Fund; 3. That the 2021 Capital Budget for the City of Pickering with a Gross Expenditure of $73,041,800 be adopted as presented: a) That the following c apital financing s ources be appr oved as presented in the 2021 Capital Budget: Transfer from Current Fund to Capital Fund $731,660 Transfers from Reserves: - Rate Stabilization Reserve (7021) 4,040,043 - City Share Dev. Charges (7022) 1,811,500 - Vehicle Replacement (7040) 1,547,000 - Major Equipment Reserve (7062) 1,345,000 - Capital Replacement (7001) 384,600 - Facilities Reserve (7055) 385,000 - Self-Insurance Reserve (7020) 200,000 - Property Fence Line Reserve (7057) 180,000 - Tennis Court Reserve (7061) 90,000 - Artwork Reserve (7067) 50,000 - Don Beer Arena Surcharge (7033) 40,000 - Rec. Complex Pool Surcharge (7035) 30,000 Transfers from Reserve Funds: - Development Charges (7601 – 7630) 25,024,180 - Third Party Contribution (7501) 9,041,375 - Parkland (7502) 4,180,000 - 20 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm - Federal Gas Tax Funds (7505) 3,567,000 - Roads & Bridges (7709) 790,000 - Animal Shelter (7706) 291,400 - Seaton Land Group FIA (7713) 145,785 Debt - 20 yr 11,391,900 Internal Loan - 2 yr 2,175,000 Internal Loan - 5 yr 200,000 Internal Loan - 10 yr 247,500 Donations 10,000 Canada Cultural Spaces Fund (CCSF) 4,000,000 Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP) – 222,500 COVID -19 Resilience Infrastructure Stream Federal Grant – TBD 40,000 Provincial Grant – Ontario Community Infrastructure 880,357 Fund (OCIF) Total $73,041,800 b) That total external debt financed by property taxes of $11,391,900 for the projects identified in the 2021 Capital Budget, and as indicated in this report, for a period not to exceed 20 years be approved; c) That the internal loans in the amount of $2,622,500 be undertaken at the discretion of the Director, Finance & Treasurer; d) That projects identified in the 2021 Capital Budget as being financed through the issuance of debt be subject to additional, specific approval of the expenditure and the financing by Council; e) That the source of financing for the Demolition & Site Remediation capital project (5315.1901) be changed from future land sales to Operations Centre Reserve Fund to eliminate the unfinanced capital liability when the project is converted to the new financial system; f) That any debt repayment, interest or financing provisions contained in the annual Current Operating Budget not used in the current year’s payments requirements may, at the discretion of the Director, Finance & Treasurer, be used to apply towards additional principal repayment, outstanding loan or debt charges or to reduce debt not issued, balloon payments in future years through transfer to Rate Stabilization Reserve, internal loans or any other amounts to be financed; - 21 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm g) That all Capital expenditures or portions thereof approved in the 2021 Capital Budget to be financed through the issuance of debt may, at the discretion of the Director, Finance & Treasurer, be financed through internal loans, current or capital funds or a combination thereof; h) That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to make draws from Reserve and Reserve Funds for projects included in the approved Capital Budget up to the amount approved; and, i) That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized at his discretion to apply any excess funds obtained through the issuance of debentures as provided for under Section 413 of the Municipal Act, 2001 as amended; 4. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to transfer: a) Any surplus current operating funds at year-end in excess of approximately $125,000 be allocated in the following manner: the first $70,000 be allocated to the Elected Officials Life Insurance Reserve and the remaining surplus be allocated in the following ratio: 25 percent to the Rate Stabilization Reserve (7021); 20 percent to the Facilities Reserve (7055); 5 percent to the Artwork Reserve (7066) and 50 percent to the City Share DC Projects Reserve (7022); b) Any surplus funds from the Emergency Operational Capital Needs Account (2901.0000.0000) to the Facilities Reserve; and, c) The revenue from the sale of used vehicles recorded in account (1593.0001.0000) to the Vehicle Replacement Reserve (7040); 5. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to make any changes or undertake any actions necessary including: adjusting the budget plan to meet provincial COVID reporting requirements while maintaining the approved levy; to accommodate any labour relations settlements including adjusting the Personnel related accounts and that any revenue shortfall as a result of a Provincial tax policy change be adjusted through the 2021 final tax rates; 6. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to use any under expenditures from projects funded from Reserves or Reserve Funds to fund over expenditures for approved projects funded from the same source(s) and any unfinanced capital be funded from a transfer from reserves or reserve funds; - 22 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm 7. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized at his discretion to fund Property Tax Write-offs account (2134.0000.000) that exceed the budget provision due to assessment appeals that translates into a deficit position for the corporation and this shortfall be funded from a transfer from the Assessment Appeal Reserve (7011) and if this reserve is depleted then the shortfall be funded from the Rate Stabilization Reserve (7021) and that any shortfall from Payment-in-Lieu Education Share revenue estimates be funded from a transfer from the Rate Stabilization Reserve (7021); 8. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to revise the funding ratio’s for development charge funded projects where applicable to reflect the removal of the 10 percent statutory deduction that was eliminated through the adoption of Bill 197, COVID-19 Economic Recovery Act, 2020; 9. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized at his discretion to close any current and completed prior year’s capital expenditure accounts and to first apply any excess funding from property taxes to any over expenditure in other accounts and to secondly transfer any remaining excess funding back to the original sources of funds; 10. That Council approve a change in funding source for capital project 5325.2105 Accessible Pedestrian Signals from 100 percent funded from the Rate Stabilization Reserve to: a) $169,838 to be funded from unused provincial grant funding (Invest in Ontario and Provincial Budget) from accounts 5999.0898.1623 and 5999.0899.1623; and, b) $190,562 to be funded from the Rate Stabilization Reserve (7021); 11. That Council approve the cancellation of the following previously approved Capital projects: a) Two 1 Ton Dump Trucks with Aluminum Body, Plow and Salter – New (Seaton) (5319.2003) - $140,000; b) Front Plow and Wing Attachments for Seaton – New (5319.2014) – $20,000; c) 1 Ton Truck with Utility Body Replacement (5319.2004) – $110,000; d) Duffin Heights Sewer (5320.1116) – $196,612; - 23 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm e) Whitevale Master Drainage Plan Implementation – Construction (5320.1901) – $2,250,000; f) RU-13 Salem Road – Road Reconstruction (5321.1608) – $155,635; g) RP-10 Altona Road – Sidewalks & Streetlights (5321.1909) – $150,000; h) Accessible Pedestrian Signals – 4 Locations (5325.2004) – $360,400; i) FS #2 Accessibility Upgrades & Interior Renovations (5340.1809) – $94,875; j) FS # 2 Lighting Retrofit (5340.2001) – $60,000; k) Civic Centre Backup Generator Replacement – Construction (5700.2002) – $800,000; l) CHDRC Tennis Court Flooring Replacement (5731.2004) – $1,200,000; m) Animal Shelter – Design (5219.2003) – $881,850; n) Animal Shelter – Construction (5219.2004) – $8,273,650; and, o) Animal Shelter – FF&E (5219.2005) – $300,000; 12. That Council approve an increase to the Fire Protection Cost Centre (2240) budget, in the amount of $27,200 for the purchase of technology upgrades and the corresponding cost be offset 100 percent by Provincial Fire Safety Grant; 13. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized at his discretion to close any capital or consulting account expenditure and corresponding revenue source that is over three years from the original purchase order date of issuance; 14. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized at his discretion to refinance any capital expenditures that failed to meet the Federal Gas Tax reporting criteria from other sources including transfers of funds from reserves and reserve funds; 15. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to: - 24 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm a) Undertake transactions in the spot or forward (12 months or less) currency markets in order to effect United States dollar denominated expenditures in the Current or Capital Budgets; b) Sign leases or rental agreements (including summer rentals) on the City’s behalf for the provision of vehicles or equipment required for temporary use during periods of equipment breakdown or repair or during periods of increased need (e.g. inclement weather); c) Restate the 2021 Current Operating, User Fees and Capital Budgets to reflect: (i) any Council changes made at the March 22 Council meeting; (ii) any reorganization or personnel account changes (salary, benefits and overtime), (iii) reclassifications that result from salary increases or negotiated labour settlements; and, d) To process budget transfers during the fiscal year which do not change the overall approved property tax levy; 16. That Council waive the Purchasing Policy where the estimated vehicle repair cost is below $30,000 (HST excluded) for all fleet vehicles and off road vehicle equipment in 2021; 17. That Council authorize the Director, Finance & Treasurer to administer the Community Investment Fund by following the general intent of the Community Grants program; a) That any grant funding request up to $2,500 be jointly approved by the Chief Administrative Officer and the Director, Finance & Treasurer and any grant request above this amount be approved by Members of Council and staff report to Council regarding the use of these funds through the 2022 Budget process; 18. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to amend Section 06.01 b) and 06.02 b) of Policy ADM 190 such that the word “every” be replaced with “Starting in 2022”; 19. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized at his discretion to draw from the Winter Control Reserve to fund any Current Budget deficit as a result of higher than budget winter control costs; 20. That Council approve the continuing engagement of the firm of Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. to be used for the Five Year Capital & Operating Financial Plan; for the engagement of the new Development Charge Background Study and new Community Benefit Charge Study and - 25 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm in support of the DC Background Study and issues related to the City, Seaton and/or Duffin Heights; 21. That Council approve the continuing engagement of the following firms: Nixon Poole Lackie LLP, Municipal Tax Advisor Group and Municipal Tax Equity Consultants for any studies related to the reassessment or other property tax issues and for to protect the property tax base by defending assessment appeals through proactive assessment base management; 22. That Council approve the award of professional services in accordance with the City's Purchasing Policy Item 10: 03 (c) to Public Sector Digest Inc. for the completion of the Ontario Regulation 588 (2021) Compliant Asset Management Plan in the amount of a maximum of $70,000; 23. That Council approve the establishment of the WSIB Excess Indemnity Reserve Fund and that the draft by-law attached hereto for the establishment of the reserve fund be enacted; 24. That Council approve the transfer of $136,775 to the WSIB Excess Indemnity Reserve Fund; 25. That Council approve the annual transfer of funds from the WSIB Reserve when its year-end balance is greater than $4.0 million, and that these excess funds be transferred to the WSIB Excess Indemnity Reserve Fund; 26. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to initiate any additional assessment appeals necessary to protect the assessment base of the City; 27. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized at his discretion to transfer any green energy rebates and revenue associated with the Claremont solar roof rental project account (1530.2620.0000) and other incentives and rebates account (2620.9993.0000) to the Reserve for Sustainable Initiatives; 28. That Council amend the Community Grant policy as follows: a) That the grant application deadline date for the 2022 Community Grant Program be October 29, 2021 to give community groups sufficient time to complete their applications; 29. That any unused funds in excess of $1,000 for accessibility capital projects (6183) be transferred to the Reserve for Accessibility Initiatives (7053); - 26 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm 30. That Council approve the following to be added to the 2021 Budget to be funded from the Rate Stabilization Reserve (7021); a) $35,000 for the rental of an additional radar camera; and, b) $150,000 for Pickering Fire Services’ share of the cost for NG911 Dispatch equipment (text to 911); 31. That any unspent 2021 Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) funds budgeted under General Government consulting account (2126.2392) be transferred to the Tennis Court Reserve (7061); 32. That Council approve the 2021 Low Income Seniors & Persons with Disabilities grant amount to be increased from $375 to $450 per household; 33. That Council pass the attached General Municipal Fees and Charges By- law and incorporate the user fee schedule into the 2021 Current Budget: a) That Council approve revising “Schedule B – Fees Payable for Building Permits” of the Building By-law with the Building Permit fees listed in the 2021 User Fee Schedule; 34. That Council approve the establishment of the 2021 COVID-19 Recovery Reserve Fund and that the draft by-law attached hereto for the establishment of the reserve fund be enacted and that the Provincial funds received be transferred to this reserve fund; 35. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to draw from the 2021 COVID-19 Recovery Reserve Fund to maintain the City’s financial and business plans due to direct and indirect affects of COVID-19; 36. That Council approve the levy allocation of the $121,300 for Provincial accessibility requirements to the following accounts: 2621.2479.0000 Sfwr/Hdwr Maint Contracts $13,800 2621.2340.0000 Seminars & Education 7,500 2621.1100.0000 Salaries & Wages 70,000 2621.2399.0000 Outside Agency Services 30,000 37. That Council approve the funding of the Coordinator, Community Safety position (Cost Centre 2712), either by senior government grants or by a transfer from the Rate Stabilization Reserve (7021); and, 38. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. - 27 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm Carried Later in the Meeting (See Following Motions) Resolution #547/21 Moved by Councillor Ashe Seconded by Councillor Cumming That Items 2 a ) (i), 2 a) (ii) and 2 b) and 2 c) of the main motion be divided in order that they may be voted on separately. Carried Item 2 a) (i) now being before Council: Having previously declared a conflict of interest, Councillor Brenner did not vote on the following item. Resolution #548/21 Moved by Councillor Cumming Seconded by Councillor McLean That the 2021 Current Budget for Cost Centre 2712 (Programs) expenditure for personnel costs, consisting of salaries and wages (Account 1100), overtime (Account 1200) and employer contributions (Account 1400) in the total amount of $1,137,031 be approved Carried Item 2 a) (ii) now being before Council: Having previously declared a conflict of interest, Councillor Brenner did not vote on the following item. Resolution #549/21 Moved by Councillor Cumming Seconded by Councillor Pickles That the 2021 Current Budget for Cost Centre 2293 (Animal Services) expenditure for personnel costs, consisting of salaries and wages (Account 1100), overtime (Account 1200) and employer contributions (Account 1400) in the total amount of $506,210 be approved; - 28 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm Carried Item 2 b) now being before Council: Having previously declared a conflict of interest, Councillor McLean did not vote on the following item. Resolution #550/21 Moved by Councillor Cumming Seconded by Councillor Butt That the 2021 General Government Budget for grant expenditures in the total amount of $184,068 be approved; Carried Item 2 c) now being before Council: Having previously declared a conflict of interest, Councillor McLean did not vote on the following item. Resolution #551/21 Moved by Councillor Cumming Seconded by Councillor Pickles That The Heritage Property Tax Rebate in the amount of $10,000 be approved; Carried The remaining items of the main motion were then Carried Unanimously on a Recorded Vote. 11.4 (Acting) Director, Community Services, Report CS 16-21 Tender for GALCC RTU-1 Replacement - Tender No. T2020-15 Resolution # 552/21 Moved by Councillor Brenner Seconded by Councillor Cumming 1. That Tender No. T2020-15 submitted by 1747204 Ontario Inc. Ace Services, in the amount of $146,787.00 (HST included), be accepted; - 29 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm 2. That the total gross project cost of $214,858.00 (HST included), including the amount of the tender, and other associated costs, and the total net project cost of $193,486.00 (net of HST rebate), be approved; 3. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to finance the total net project cost of $193,486.00 as follows: a) the sum of $100,000.00, as provided for in the 2020 Community Centres Capital Budget be funded by a transfer from the Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund; b) the additional sum of $93,486.00 be funded by a transfer from the Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund; c) the Treasurer be authorized to make any changes, adjustments, and revisions to amounts, terms, conditions, or take any actions necessary in order to effect the foregoing; and, 4. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect hereto. Carried 11.5 Fire Chief, Report FIR 01-21 Tender for the Construction of a New Fire Station Headquarters at Brock Road and Zents Drive - Tender No. T2020-3 Resolution # 553/21 Moved by Councillor Pickles Seconded by Councillor Butt 1. That Tender No. T2020-3 submitted by Percon Construction Inc., in the amount of $9,260,350.00 (HST included), be accepted; 2. That the total gross project cost of $9,972,250.00 (HST included), including the amount of the t ender, and other associated costs, and the total net project cost of $8,980,320.00 (net of HST rebate), be approved; 3. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to finance the total net project cost of $8,980,320.00 as follows: - 30 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm a) the sum of $2,765,000.00, be financed by the issue of debentures by The Regional Municipality of Durham over a period not to exceed 20 years; b) the sum of $6,213,000.00 be financed by the issue of debentures by The Regional Municipality of Durham over a period not to exceed 20 years to address the funding shortfall of the Development Charges- Protection Services Reserve Fund, and this amount be repaid from future development charge collections; c) the sum of $2,320.00 b e funded from property taxes; d) the annual repayment charges in the amount of approximately $194,550.00 be included in the annual Current Budget for the City of Pickering commencing 2021, or such subsequent year in which the debentures are issued, and continuing thereafter until the debenture financing is repaid; e) the annual repayment charges in the amount of approximately $437,155.00 be included in the annual Current Budget for the City of Pickering commencing 2021, or such subsequent year in which the debentures are issued, and continuing thereafter until the debenture financing i s repaid from future development charge collections as the first source of repayment, and the cost of the annual repayment charges be included in the next Development Charges Background Study; and, f) the Treasurer be authorized to make any changes, adjustments, and revisions to amounts, terms, conditions, or take any actions necessary in order to effect the foregoing; 4. That the draft debenture by-laws attached to this report be enacted; and, 5. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect hereto. Carried 11.6 Director, Human Resources, Report HUR 02-21 Diversity & Inclusion Strategy - Request for Proposal No. RFP 2020-10 Resolution # 554/21 Moved by Councillor Brenner - 31 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm Seconded by Councillor Butt 1. That Proposal No. RFP 2020-10 submitted by Goss Gilroy Inc. dated November 26, 2020 to facilitate the completion of a Diversity & Inclusion (D&I) Strategy for the Corporation of the City of Pickering and the Pickering Public Library in the amount of $74,163.31 (HST included) be accepted; and, 2. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. Carried 11.7 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 15-21 Comprehensive Zoning By-law Review, Phases 2 and 3 Consultant Delegation Bobby Gauthier, WSP, joined the electronic meeting to present on Report PLN 15- 21, and highlighted the Comprehensive Zoning By-law Review, Phases 2 and 3. He noted that the comprehensive Zoning By-Law review would preserve the details of the different communities, adding that it would bring together all of the separate zoning by-laws into one consolidated comprehensive by-law. He advised that this would make i t easier for the pu blic to find information regarding zoning and ensured that the new by-law would reflect the Official Plan policies and associated development guidelines, and be consistent with current legislation, policy and trends. Mr. Gauthier spoke to timelines, and eight discussion papers developed during phase one. He explained that phase two would include the preparation of the draft By-law, public consultation to obtain feedback on the By- law, required revisions to the draft By-law based on stakeholder/public input, and the preparation of a recommended By-law. Mr. Gauthier noted that the review would include a presentation to the Planning & Development Committee regarding the recommended By-law for Council adoption w ith the By-law being presented to Council in the spring of 2022. Mr. Gauthier advised that the different discussion papers addressed topics, ranging from guiding principles and parameters to parking, active transportation and cannabis production, adding that each discussion paper had recommendations, which had formed the basis of the work plan. Mr. Gauthier confirmed all documents were available on the City’s website, and highlighted key recommendations for the streamlined Zoning By-Law, which would be user friendly, modern and drafted using the guiding principles in Discussion Paper 1. Mr. Gauthier outlined next steps, and proceeding with the drafting of the new Zoning By-Law to be released to the public for input in the fall of 2021. - 32 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm A brief question and answer period ensued between Members of Council, Staff, and Mr. Gauthier regarding: • ensuring that the Indigenous community was engaged during the consultation process; and, • examining the City’s protocol on consultation to ensure people are being engaged in the right way, and adequately engaging Indigenous People. Staff advised that there is currently no written protocol for consulting Indigenous People, however this would not preclude engagement and that staff would work with the consultant to engage with the Indigenous Community. Resolution # 555 /21 Moved by Councillor McLean Seconded by Councillor Butt 1. That the conclusions and recommendations of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law Review – Phase 1 – Discussion Papers, be received; 2. That the total gross project cost of $266,804.00 (HST included) for Phases 2 and 3 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law Review, and the total net project cost of $240,265.00 (net of HST rebate), be approved; 3. That Council authorize the Director, Finance & Treasurer to finance the Phases 2 and 3 net project cost in the amount of $240,265.00 as follows: a) The sum of $78,086.00, identified for this project in the 2021 Current Budget – Planning & Design Cost Centre, be funded from the Rate Stabilization Fund; and, b) The sum of $162,179.00, identified in the 2021 Current Budget – Planning & Design Cost Centre, be funded by a transfer from the Development Charges – Studies Reserve Fund; 4. That Council authorize staff to request that the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing undertake a review of the Minister’s Zoning Orders being Ontario Regulations 102/72, 19/74 and 154/03, to harmonize agricultural and rural provisions with the C ity’s new zoning by-law; and, 5. That the appropriate City of Pickering staff be authorized to enter into any agreements to give effect hereto. Carried - 33 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm 11.8 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 14-21 Environmental Registry Posting 019-3136 Response to consultation regarding growing the Provincial Greenbelt Resolution # 556/21 Moved by Councillor Pickles Seconded by Councillor Ashe 1. That the comments in Report PLN 14-21, on Environmental Registry Posting (ERO) 019-3136 regarding growing the Provincial Greenbelt, be endorsed; 2. That the Province maintain the current established Greenbelt boundary within the City of Pickering on the basis that: a. Any consideration or decision regarding expanding the Greenbelt in Pickering would be premature and not in the public interest, prior to the completion of the Region of Durham’s Municipal Comprehensive Review and in particular, prior to the completion of the Land Needs Assessment, updated Natural Heritage System mapping, and review and implementation of the Provincial Agricultural System, in order to fully understand the implications and determine appropriateness of growing the Greenbelt; b. All lands within Pickering are covered by the policies of A Place to Grow and the Greenbelt Plan, which were further strengthened through the most recent updates to the provincial plans, and the Provincial Policy Statement, and which together provide the highest level of protection for natural heritage and hydrologic features and areas, as well as agricultural areas; and, c. The City, by Resolutions 140/19 and 173/19 affirmed its position that the lands in Northeast Pickering, be reserved to accommodate future urban development; 3. That in order to minimize competing interests and priorities, the Province should explore opportunities on the outer fringes of the existing Greenbelt for further expansion, rather than the areas closest to the existing built up urban areas which may be needed t o accommodate future development within proximity to transit and other existing and planned infrastructure investments by municipalities and the Province; 4. That should the Province decide to consider growing the Greenbelt within the City of Pickering: - 34 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm a. Any additions to the Greenbelt Plan be considered in the context of the Region of Durham’s Municipal Comprehensive Review; b. The legislated public process for amendments to the Greenbelt be followed, including consultation with City of Pickering, the Region of Durham, Indigenous communities, and affected property owners, prior to any final decision being made; c. Any decision to expand the Greenbelt should not compromise the ability of the municipality to accommodate future urban growth; and, d. Criteria be established and implementation guidance be provided to guide refinement to the Greenbelt Natural Heritage System by municipalities, similar to the criteria and guidance that have been established for the Growth Plan Natural Heritage System; and, 5. That staff be directed to respond to ERO Posting 019-3136 with a copy of Report PLN 14-21 and Council’s resolution thereon, and that a copy of Report PLN 14-21 be forwarded to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, MPP Peter Bethlenfalvy, the Regional Municipality of Durham, and other Durham area municipalities. Carried 12. Motions and Notice of Motions There were no notices of motion. 13. By-laws 13.1 By-law 7823/21 Being a by-law to amend By-law No. 6191/03 to confirm General Municipal Fees. 13.2 By-law 7824/21 Being a By-law to Provide for the Establishment of a Reserve Fund to be Known as the WSIB Excess Indemnity Reserve Fund. 13.3 By-law 7825/21 Being a By-law to Provide for the Establishment of a Reserve Fund to be Known as the 2021 COVID-19 Recovery Reserve Fund. - 35 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm 13.4 By-law 7826/21 Being a by-law to authorize the Construction of a New Fire Station Headquarters at Brock Road and Zents Drive project in the City of Pickering and the issuance of debentures in the amount of $6,213,000.00 for Development Charges- Protection Services Reserve Fund funding for the Construction of a New Fire Station Headquarters at Brock Road and Zents Drive project, and that the first source of repayment for this debt is future development charge collections. 13.5 By-law 7827/21 Being a by-law to authorize the Construction of a New Fire Station Headquarters at Brock Road and Zents Drive project in the City of Pickering and the issuance of debentures in the amount of $2,765,000.00. 13.6 By-law 7828/21 Being a by-law to amend Zoning Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 2511, as amended, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham, on Part of Lot 19, Range 3, B.F.C., Part 1, 40R-8832 and Part 1, 40R- 10527, in the City of Pickering. (A 12/18). 13.7 By-law 7829/21 Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 7364/14, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham, for land at Part of Lot 22, 23, 24 & 25 Concession 4, City of Pickering (A 04/17). 13.8 By-law 7830/21 Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 3036, as amended, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham, Part of Lots 31 and 32, Concession 2 South, Now Parts 2 to 4 and 6, 40R-29566 and Part 2, 40R-29965, City of Pickering (A 01/19). 13.9 By-law 7831/21 Being a by-law to exempt Block Q, Plan M-15, Pickering, from the part lot control provisions of the Planning Act. 13.10 By-law 7832/21 Being a by-law to exempt Blocks 224 to 264, Plan 40M-2625, Pickering from the part lot control provisions of the Planning Act. - 36 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm Resolution # 557/21 Moved by Councillor Butt Seconded by Councillor Pickles That By-law Numbers 7823/21 through 7832/21 be approved. Carried 14. Confidential Council – Public Report Mayor Ryan stated that prior to the Regular Council Meeting, an In-camera session was held at 6:30 p.m. in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Act and Procedure By-law 7665/18 to consider personal matters about identifiable individuals as it relates to appointments to the Accessibility Advisory Committee. 14.1 Appointments to the Pickering Accessibility Advisory Committee. Carried Resolution # 558/21 Moved by Councillor McLean Seconded by Councillor Cumming That Phyllis Milton, Tammy Lyle-Gravlev, and Anna Taverna, be appointed to the Accessibility Advisory Committee for a term ending November 14, 2022 or until a successor is appointed. Carried 15. Other Business 15.1 Councillor Brenner raised the matter of the development of a protocol on consultation and engagement with Indigenous People on planning matters. A brief question and answer period ensued between Members of Council and staff regarding the City’s obligations under a duty to accommodate. Paul Bigioni, Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor advised that these duties are broad in scope and come from a constitutional Crown obligation to consult Indigenous People on decisions that may affect Aboriginal and Treaty rights. He added that reviewing the context of the protocol will give staff an opportunity to research this matter thoroughly and define the protocols with respect to the role of First Nations as well as constitutional and legal parameters. Resolution # 5 59/21 - 37 - Council Meeting Minutes March 22, 2021 Electronic Meeting 7:00 pm Moved by Councillor Brenner Seconded by Councillor McLean 1. That Staff through the Chief Administrative Office be directed to report back on a consultation and duty to consult protocol for Indigenous Peoples on land use planning matters; and, 2. That staff report back no later than the September 27, 2021 Council meeting. Carried Unanimously on a Recorded Vote 16. Confirmation By-law By-law Number 7833/21 Councillor McLean, seconded by Councillor Cumming moved for leave to introduce a By- law of the City of Pickering to confirm the proceedings of March 22, 2021. Carried 17. Adjournment Moved by Councillor McLean Seconded by Councillor Butt That the meeting be adjourned. Carried The meeting adjourned at 10:13 pm. Dated this 22nd of March, 2021. David Ryan, Mayor Susan Cassel, City Clerk - 38 - Special Council Meeting Minutes March 30, 2021 Electronic Meeting 3:30 pm Present: Mayor David Ryan Councillors: K. Ashe M. Brenner S. Butt I. Cumming B. McLean D. Pickles Also Present: M. Carpino - Chief Administrative Officer K. Bentley - Director, City Development & CBO P. Bigioni - Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor R. Holborn - Director, Engineering Services S. Cassel - City Clerk C. Rose - Chief Planner N. Surti - Manager, Development Review & Urban Design C. Blumenberg - Deputy Clerk 1.Roll Call The City Clerk certified that all Members of Council were present and participating electronically in accordance with By-law 7771/20. 2.Disclosure of Interest No disclosures of interest were noted. 3. In Camera Matters Resolution # 560/21 Moved by Councillor Butt Seconded by Councillor Cumming That Council move into closed session in accordance with the provisions of Section 239 (2) of the Municipal Act and Procedural By-law 7665/18, in that the matters to be discussed relate to: - 39 - Special Council Meeting Minutes March 30, 2021 Electronic Meeting 3:30 pm e) litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board; and, f) advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose. Carried 3.1 Confidential Memorandum from the Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor and Director, City Development & Chief Building Official Re: LPAT Case No. PL190541 - Appeal by CAPREIT L imited Partnership of Zoning By-law 7713/19 This portion of the meeting was closed to the public. Refer to the In Camera meeting minutes for further information. [City Clerk has custody and control of the In Camera minutes.] Resolution # 561/21 Moved by Councillor Brenner Seconded by Councillor Cumming That Council rise and ratify the recommendations from the closed session. Carried Mayor Ryan stated that during the closed portion of the meeting, Council considered a matter pertaining to litigation or potential litigation, received advice subject to solicitor-client privilege, and provided direction to staff. 4. Confirmation By-law By-law Number 7834/21 Councillor Cumming, seconded by Councillor Pickles moved for leave to introduce a by- law of the City of Pickering to confirm the proceedings of March 30, 2021. Carried 5. Adjournment Moved by Councillor Cumming Seconded by Councillor Brenner - 40 - Special Council Meeting Minutes March 30, 2021 Electronic Meeting 3:30 pm That the meeting be adjourned. Carried The meeting adjourned at 3:54 pm. Dated this 30th of March, 2021. David Ryan, Mayor Susan Cassel, City Clerk - 41 - Executive Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 2:00 pm Chair: Councillor Ashe Present: Mayor David Ryan Councillors: K. Ashe M. Brenner S. Butt I. Cumming B. McLean D. Pickles Also Present: M. Carpino - Chief Administrative Officer K. Bentley - Director, City Development & CBO P. Bigioni - Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor B. Duffield - (Acting) Director, Community Services J. Hagg - Fire Chief J. Flowers - CEO & Director of Public Libraries, Pickering Public Library R. Holborn - Director, Engineering Services F. Jadoon - Director, Economic Development & Strategic Projects S. Karwowski - Director, Finance & Treasurer J. Eddy - Director, Human Resources S. Cassel - City Clerk C. Blumenberg - Deputy Clerk T. Javed - Economic Development & Strategic Projects Associate 1. Roll Call The City Clerk certified that all Members of Council were present and participating electronically in accordance with By-law 7771/20. 2. Disclosure of Interest No disclosures of interest were noted. 3. Delegations There were no delegations. 4. Matters for Consideration 1 - 42 - Executive Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 2:00 pm Chair: Councillor Ashe 4.1 Director, Economic Development & Strategic Projects, Report CAO 03-21 Community Partner Membership Agreement - Canadian Centre for Nuclear Sustainability A brief question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee and Fiaz Jadoon, Director, Economic Development & Strategic Projects, regarding: • the frequency of updates to Council regarding the Community Partner Membership Agreement – Canadian Centre for Nuclear Sustainability to ensure that Council is kept apprised; • Ontario Power Generation (OPG) and participating partners working on a correspondence strategy, with Staff to confirm whether updates to Council would be provided on a quarterly, annual, or bi-annual basis; • the importance of keeping Council and the public aware of the Centre for Canadian Nuclear Sustainability activities, scope of work, and mandate; and, • how exceptional the re-purposing of the facility has been, which will attract skilled jobs, collaboration and research in the nuclear sector. Recommendation: Moved by Mayor Ryan Seconded by Councillor Pickles 1. That Report CAO 03-21 regarding the Community Partner Membership Agreement, between Ontario Power Generation Inc. (OPG) and The Corporation of the City of Pickering, be received; 2. That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Community Partner Membership Agreement with Ontario Power Generation set out in Attachment 1 to this Report, subject to minor revisions as may be required by the Chief Administrative Officer, Director, Economic Development & Strategic Projects and the Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor; 3. The City Clerk forward a copy of this Report CAO 03-21 to the Regional Municipality of Durham and Ontario Power Generation; and, 4. That appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the actions necessary to implement the recommendations in this Report. Carried 2 - 43 - Executive Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 2:00 pm Chair: Councillor Ashe 4.2 (Acting) Director, Community Services, Report CS 15-21 Emix Ltd. - Lease Amendment Agreement Recommendation: Moved by Councillor Brenner Seconded by Mayor Ryan 1. That Report CS 15-21 respecting the City of Pickering’s Lease Amendment Agreement with Emix Ltd. at 1101 Kingston Road, Suite 280, Pickering, be received; 2. That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Lease Amendment Agreement with Emix Ltd. set out in Attachment 1 to this Report, subject to minor revisions as may be required by the Director, Community Services and the Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor; and, 3. That the appropriate City officials be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. Carried 4.3 Director, Engineering Services, Report ENG 07-21 Proposed All-way Stop - William Jackson Drive and Bronzedale Street/Kalmar Avenue A brief question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee and Richard Holborn, Director, Engineering Services, regarding: • timing of the project with respect to signage installation. Mr. Holborn advised that once approved at the April 26, 2021 Council meeting, staff would complete the utility locates and line markings, with the sign installation being completed by end of May 2021; • public interest from residents regarding the proposed all-way stop at William Jackson Drive and Bronzedale Street/Kalmar Avenue, with many comments from residents on traffic control concerns at Rex Heath and William Jackson Drive, and the timing of traffic control measures for this intersection; • how the full build-out of the area would create traffic volumes to warrant an all-way stop or traffic signal at Rex Heath and William Jackson Drive; and, 3 - 44 - Executive Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 2:00 pm Chair: Councillor Ashe • how it may be beneficial to bring traffic calming measures to Rex Heath and William Jackson Drive sooner than anticipated, and prior to construction completion East of Brock Road, due to increasing traffic volume and safety to access the park. Recommendation: Moved by Councillor Pickles Seconded by Councillor Butt 1. That the attached draft by-law be enacted to amend Schedule "7" to By-law 6604/05 to provide for the regulation of stop signs on highways or parts of highways under the jurisdiction of The Corporation of the City of Pickering, specifically to address the proposed installation of an all-way stop control at the intersection of William Jackson Drive and Bronzedale Street/Kalmar Avenue; and, 2. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. Carried 4.4 Director, Engineering Services, Report ENG 08-21 Krosno Creek Culvert Replacements – Gas Main Relocations Morden Lane, Reytan Boulevard, and Alyssum Street (including Sandy Beach Road) A brief question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee and Richard Holborn, Director, Engineering Services, regarding: • the timing on completion of the Krosno Creek Culvert replacements – Gas Main Relocations and next steps of the project. Mr. Holborn advised that Enbridge Gas Inc. was ready to start work, and once approved by Council, staff would issue a tender to replace the culverts noting that once work had been completed, construction could commence on the Sandy Beach Road culvert, followed by utility relocations and the tender for construction on Sandy Beach Road; • how the project had been delayed a year due to the COVID-19 pandemic, with the detailed design having been completed in 2019; • how the work pertaining to the culvert replacements was best done during the lowest flow, as opposed to the summer or fall; and • ensuring that Council is kept apprised throughout the stages of the project. 4 - 45 - Executive Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 2:00 pm Chair: Councillor Ashe Recommendation: Moved by Councillor McLean Seconded by Councillor Cumming 1. That the cost proposals for gas main relocations submitted by Enbridge Gas Inc. for; Morden Lane, Reytan B oulevard, and Alyssum Street (including Sandy Beach Road) in the amount of $296,872.94 (HST included) be accepted; 2. That the total net project cost of $294,078.00 (net of HST rebate) for the proposals be approved; 3. That Council authorize the Director, Finance & Treasurer to fund the net project cost of $294,078.00 for the proposals as follows: a) the sum of $152,921.00 by a transfer from Development Charges City’s Share Reserve; b) the sum of $141,157.00 by a transfer from Development Charges- Stormwater Management Reserve Fund; and, 4. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. Carried 4.5 Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor, Report LEG 07-21 Property Standards By-law A brief question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee and Paul Bigioni, Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor, regarding: • timelines for public consultation and Council approval. Mr. Bigioni advised that public consultation would be undertaken over a two month period to gain meaningful input from the public and stakeholders, and that the Report would be presented for Council approval in the fourth quarter of 2021; • how the Property Standards By-law addresses maintenance standards and how this relates to access to properties for enforcement of the B y-law; • provisions in the Property Standards By-law that provide staff with the ability to bring property matters into compliance and enforce the By-law; and, 5 - 46 - Executive Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 2:00 pm Chair: Councillor Ashe • whether the draining of a swimming pool onto an adjacent property was captured in the provisions of the proposed By-law. Mr. Bigioni advised that this action was referenced in the Nuisance By-law and that he would make a note of this during public consultation to ensure there is division of the subject matter and clarity between both By-laws.. Recommendation: Moved by Councillor Brenner Seconded by Councillor Butt 1. That Report LEG 07-21 regarding the attached Property Standards By-law be received; 2. That Corporate Services staff be directed to work with Corporate Communications staff to conduct a public consultation campaign, to include social media, to seek public and stakeholder input regarding the attached Property Standards By-law; 3. That the Property Standards By-law be presented to Council after completion of the public consultation campaign; and, 4. That appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the actions necessary to implement the recommendations in this Report. Carried 5. Other Business There was no other business. 6. Adjournment Moved by Councillor McLean Seconded by Councillor Pickles That the meeting be adjourned. Carried The meeting adjourned at 2:26 p.m. 6 - 47 - Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner 1 Present: Mayor David Ryan Councillors: D. Pickles Also Present: M. Carpino -Chief Administrative Officer K. Bentley -Director, City Development & CBO S. Cassel -City Clerk C. Rose -Chief Planner N. Surti -Manager, Development Review & Urban Design D. Wylie -Manger of Zoning and Administration C. Celebre -Principal Planner, Strategic Initiatives R. Pym -Principal Planner, Strategic Initiatives C. Morrison -Principal Planner, Development Review C. Blumenberg - Deputy Clerk T.Bal -Planner ll I. Lima -Planner I K. Ashe M. Brenner S. Butt I. Cumming B. McLean 1.Roll Call The City Clerk certified that all Members of Council were present and participating electronically in accordance with By-law 7771/20 save and except for Councillor Pickles. Councillor Pickles joined the meeting at 7:01 p.m. 2.Disclosure of Interest No disclosures of interest were noted. 3.Statutory Public Meetings Councillor Brenner, Chair, gave an outline of the requirements for a Statutory Public Meeting under the Planning Act. He outlined the notification process procedures and also noted that if a person or public body does not make oral or written submissions to the City - 48 - Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner 2 before the By-law is passed, that person or public body are not entitled to appeal the decision of City Council to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT), and may not be entitled to be added as a party to the hearing unless, in the opinion of LPAT, there are reasonable grounds to do so. Catherine Ross, Chief Planner, appeared before the Committee to act as facilitator for the Statutory Public Meeting portion of the meeting, explaining the process for discussion purposes as well as the order of speakers. Moved by Mayor Ryan Seconded by Councillor Cumming That the rules of procedure be suspended to allow two additional delegations under Section 4 of the agenda regarding Report PLN 17-21. Carried on a Two-Thirds Vote 3.1 Information Report No. 07-21 Revised Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 12/17 (R) Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2020-03 Draft Plan of Condominium CP-2020-03 Brock Dersan Developments Inc. Southwest corner of Brock Road and Dersan Street (2540 and 2550 Brock Road) A statutory public meeting was held under the Planning Act, for the purpose of informing the public with respect to the above-noted application. Cristina Celebre, Principal Planner, Strategic Initiatives provided the Committee with an overview of Revised Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 12/17 (R) Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2020-03, and Draft Plan of Condominium CP-2020- 03. Through the aid of a PowerPoint presentation, Ms. Celebre outlined that the subject lands comprise of 3 properties, having a combined area of approximately 2.56 hectares, with approximately 143 metres of frontage along Brock Road, approximately 195 metres of frontage along Dersan Street and approximately 153 metres of frontage along Four Seasons Lane. Ms. Celebre outlined the revised application to facilitate a residential condominium development containing a total of 204 townhouse units including: 68 back-to-back stacked townhouses units (4- storeys in height), 16 traditional townhouse units (3 storeys in height), 55 rear lane townhouse units (3 storeys in height), and 65 stacked house units (3 storeys in height). Ms. Celebre outlined the revised proposal, and the planning policy framework including the City’s Official Plan and Duffin Heights Development - 49 - Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner 3 Guidelines. Ms. Celebre outlined the comments received for further review and consideration, and the next steps in the applications. Adam Layton, Partner, Evans Planning Inc., joined the electronic meeting via audio connection to present an overview of the applications on behalf of the applicant, Brock Dersan Developments Inc. Through the aid of a PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Layton outlined the subject property, conceptual site plans, central amenity area, and conceptual elevations of each type of proposed dwelling. He noted that the visitor parking is located within proximity to the hydro corridor. There were no delegations from the public. A question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee, Adam Layton, and Staff, regarding: whether the common elements are being divided by all condominium types, and if there will be reciprocal easements and cost sharing agreements across all common areas; expanding the park, and including different types of equipment with staff confirming that a facility fit plan would be undertaken to ensure the park accommodates usage and a variety of equipment through the site plan control application process; whether the easement agreement was secured for visitor parking with Hydro One; and, location of visitor parking and whether the interior parking garage was fully underground. 3.2 Information Report No. 08-21 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 04/21 City Initiated Amendment to Seaton Zoning By-law 7364/14 Corner Rounding Zoning Provisions A statutory public meeting was held under the Planning Act, for the purpose of informing the public with respect to the above-noted application. Isabel Lima, Planner I, provided the Committee with an overview of City Initiated, Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 04/21. Through the aid of a PowerPoint presentation, Ms. Lima noted that the purpose of the application is to include corner rounding zoning provisions within Seaton Zoning By-law 7364/14. She outlined the purpose of corner rounding, which is to ensure obstructions such as - 50 - Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner 4 gardens, plants or fences on privately owned property do not impede the view of pedestrians, motorists and cyclists at the intersection of two street lines. Ms. Lima advised that staff have noticed an influx of minor variance for setback applications due to the exclusion of corner rounding provisions in By-law 7364/14. Ms. Lima briefly discussed public notice provisions of the proposal, including notice being circulated to the Group Manager of the Seaton Landowners Group, and next steps in the application. There were no delegations from the public and no questions from Members of the Committee. 4.Delegations 4.1 Martin Lavoie Re: Report PLN 17-21 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2019-03 Draft Plan of Condominium Application CP-2019-04 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 13/19 10046043 Canada Inc. & C. Wang Lots 14, 29 and 30, Part of Lots 22 to 26 Plan 818, Part 4 of 40R-29018, Part 1 of 40R-29545, Part 2 of 40R-30489 and Part 1 of 40R-30492 (1950 and 1952 Fairport Road) Martin Lavoie, 849 Taplin Drive, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection and through the aid of a PowerPoint presentation, outlined that he was representing a coalition of 49 households and over 100 residents within 150 meters or less of the subject lands. Mr. Lavoie noted that the proposal is inconsistent with several applicable policies and plans such as the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines. Mr. Lavoie advised that the proposal is inconsistent with the low density characteristic of the neighborhood, and proposes to replaces a single dwelling with a lot coverage of less than 5% with 27 condominiums with a lot coverage averaging 38%, which does not maximize permeability of the site, and increases density. He expressed concern for the proposal, due to increased traffic, potential flooding and erosion, contaminated soils, storm water management and negative environmental impact s due to the subject lands being adjacent to Dunbarton Creek, specifically its impacts on existing wildlife and species at risk. A question and answer period ensued b etween Members of the Committee and Martin Lavoie regarding: - 51 - Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner 5 the inclusion of additional visitor parking, road widening due to the Traffic Study, and robust tree planting plan, among other revisions made by the new applicant. Mr. Lavoie noted that the revisions are not sufficient in remediating the concerns of the coalition, noting that widening the road to 6.5 metres did not address the issue of a single access point and effects on parking and snow removal; how Fairport Road is a feeder road set to handle traffic from Finch Ave to Sheppard Avenue and Highway 2; comparison of the number of dwellings proposed and those in other developments on Fairport Road; whether an identified wetland existed on the subject lands; water infrastructure capacity, water pressure, snow removal, and parking concerns; whether the soil contamination had been addressed, and the importance of remediating before the proposed development proceeds. 4.2 Duncan Webster, Land Development Manager, GTA Land Division Andrew Scott , Associate Land Development Manager Mattamy Homes Re: Report PLN 16-21 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2015-03 (R) Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 05/15 (R) Seaton TFPM Inc. Part Lots 17 to 19, Concession 4, Part Lots 17 to 21, Concession 5 Seaton Community Duncan Webster, Partner, Land Development Manager, GTA Land Division, and Andrew Scott , Associate Land Development Manager joined the electronic meeting via audio connection on behalf of the applicant. They advised agreement with the staff recommendation and stated they were available for questions. 4.3 Duncan Webster, Land Development Manager, GTA Land Division Andrew Scott , Associate Land Development Manager Mattamy Homes Re: Report PLN 19-21 Official Plan Amendment OPA 20-005/P Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 09/20 Mattamy (Seaton) Limited Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 3, Now Parts 1 and 2, 40R-24268 and Part of Lot 3, 40R-29614 (1034 Reflection Place) - 52 - Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner 6 Duncan Webster, Partner, Land Development Manager, GTA Land Division, and Andrew Scott , Associate Land Development Manager joined the electronic meeting via audio connection on behalf of the applicant. They advised agreement with the staff recommendation and stated they were available for questions. A question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee, Duncan Webster and Andrew Scott, regarding: how the application proposes to add two Gateway Sites to ensure the population and density targets are met while providing for a mix of housing forms and tenure within the Seaton Neighbourhood; confirmation of whether there were proposed commercial uses in the application; and, the importance of including commercial uses and amenities, such as a convenience store on the subject lands and in the surrounding area. 4.4 Janice Freund Re: Report PLN 17-21 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2019-03 Draft Plan of Condominium Application CP-2019-04 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 13/19 10046043 Canada Inc. & C. Wang Lots 14, 29 and 30, Part of Lots 22 to 26 Plan 818, Part 4 of 40R-29018, Part 1 of 40R-29545, Part 2 of 40R-30489 and Part 1 of 40R-30492 (1950 and 1952 Fairport Road) Janice Freund, 829 Taplin Drive, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection to advocate for a board-on-board wood privacy fence along the entirety of the property lines, where there is adjacent existing residential for a visual barrier and buffer zone. She inquired what legal measure would be put in place to guarantee the integrity of the fence, and meet the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) requirements, such as illustrating how all vegetation in the natural heritage system would be protected from grading and construction impacts. Ms. Freund commended the inclusion of the requirement of the subdivision agreement to submit a Record of Site Condition (RSC) which will require the applicant to remediate the contaminated soil and expressed concerns regarding bull dozer activity on the site that may have spread contaminant s. She further requested that the construction of the Natural Heritage System Buffer zone not be completed during mating season for wildlife, and expressed concern that the application is incompatible with the character of the existing neighbourhood. 4.5 Brian Moss, Principal Brian Moss And Associates Ltd. - 53 - Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner 7 Re: Report PLN 17-21 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2019-03 Draft Plan of Condominium Application CP-2019-04 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 13/19 10046043 Canada Inc. & C. Wang Lots 14, 29 and 30, Part of Lots 22 to 26 Plan 818, Part 4 of 40R-29018, Part 1 of 40R-29545, Part 2 of 40R-30489 and Part 1 of 40R-30492 (1950 and 1952 Fairport Road) Brian Moss, Principal, Principal, Brian Moss and Associates Ltd., joined the electronic meeting via audio connection on behalf of the applicant. Through the aid of a PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Moss highlighted the Environmental Impact Study (EIS), Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), and extensive consultation with TRCA. He advised that the revised application included additional trees that had been removed by the prior owner, increased visitor parking, the dedication of a sliver of land to Taplin Drive that will be offered to adjacent owners, and that the proposal conforms to the existing characteristics of the neighbourhood. Mr. Moss noted that there would be positive drainage throughout the property, which will get caught up and go into Dunbarton Creek, and a setback and planting of native species buffer to enhance the wildlife habitat. Mr. Moss noted that the contaminated soil would be remediated, before final approval of the draft plan of subdivision. He spoke to the Traffic Impact Study conducted during peak hours, to assess road congestion and stated the Study concluded that Fairport Road would continue to function appropriately. He noted that the proposed road widening on Block 8 would ensure emergency vehicle access, and endeavored to address concerns raised by residents, including a privacy fence, and to avoid buffer construction during wildlife nesting and mating season. A question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee and Brian Moss regarding: the dedication of a triangular piece of land, on the southwest corner, for use as open space, at no cost to the City and whether any other lands were being conveyed to the TRCA; similarities between 1950/1952 Fairport Road and other similar developments on Fairport Road, road widths, and visitor parking; location of the proposed dwellings, and correlation with the Infill and Replacement Housing Study, with reduced lot coverage, increased front yard setback, and increased side yard setbacks which will make the proposed project more spacious with an opening to Dunbarton Creek; and, ensuring the trees planted are adequate in size and species, Staff confirmed that the owner will be required to provide a Landscape Plan - 54 - Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner 8 indicating the location, size and species of all trees, to the satisfaction of the City, including compensation. 4.6 Kenneth Peter Arndt Re: Report PLN 17-21 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2019-03 Draft Plan of Condominium Application CP-2019-04 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 13/19 10046043 Canada Inc. & C. Wang Lots 14, 29 and 30, Part of Lots 22 to 26 Plan 818, Part 4 of 40R-29018, Part 1 of 40R-29545, Part 2 of 40R-30489 and Part 1 of 40R-30492 (1950 and 1952 Fairport Road) Kenneth Peter Arndt, 1954 Fairport Road, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection to express concerns regarding the functional servicing and stormwater management report and its capacity for storm water storage to accommodate current and future flows. He requested that the easements registered on title , which require a minimum setback from his property to limit the impact of water flow off and onto his property, remain in place noting the developer was seeking to decrease the setback requirements. Mr. Arndt stated that figure 2 of the report does not identify the drainage pipe that runs through his property and noted figure 3 exhibits the retaining walls and flow being removed, despite assurances that the pipe will be diverted and external flows would be accommodated in the grading, storm water and servicing strategy. Mr. Arndt spoke to the storm management report being relied on by the community, and sought clarification on the proposed grading and impact on his property. 4.7 Brian Ferguson Re: Report PLN 17-21 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2019-03 Draft Plan of Condominium Application CP-2019-04 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 13/19 10046043 Canada Inc. & C. Wang Lots 14, 29 and 30, Part of Lots 22 to 26 Plan 818, Part 4 of 40R-29018, Part 1 of 40R-29545, Part 2 of 40R-30489 and Part 1 of 40R-30492 (1950 and 1952 Fairport Road) Brian Ferguson, 1942 Fairport Road, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection and noted the importance of the privacy fence along the property lines and pre-condition survey submission prior to any site works commencing. He advised of decreased water pressure issues that had occurred over time and requested it not be further decreased due to the development. Mr. Ferguson noted other concerns related to traffic, parking and the importance of the buffer zone - 55 - Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner 9 next to Dunbarton Creek and recommended that special provisions be included for bicycle and pedestrian trails, and additional privacy fencing. 5.Planning & Development Reports 5.1 Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor, Report LEG 04-21 Orchard Ridge (Pickering) G.P. Inc. – Plan of Subdivision 40M-2536 -Final Assumption of Plan of Subdivision -Lots 1 to 51, Blocks 52 and 53, Plan 40M-2536 A brief question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee and Staff regarding: whether the assumption of these lands, works and services included an inspection of public areas to ensure trees are growing properly, including the developer honouring dead trees; and, ensuring the condition of the asphalt includes an adequate minimum lifespan. Recommendation: Moved by Councillor Pickles Seconded by Mayor Ryan 1.That Cliffview Road within Plan 40M-2536 be assumed for public use; 2.That works and services required by the Subdivision Agreement within Plan 40M-2536, which are constructed, installed or located on lands dedicated to, or owned by the City, or on lands lying immediately adjacent thereto, including lands that are subject to easements transferred to the City, be accepted and assumed for maintenance; 3.That Orchard Ridge (Pickering) G.P. Inc. be released from the provisions of the Subdivision Agreement and any amendments thereto relating to Plan 40M-2536; and, 4.That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the actions necessary to implement the recommendations in this report. Carried 5.2 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 16-21 - 56 - Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner 10 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2015-03 (R) Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 05/15 (R) Seaton TFPM Inc. Part Lots 17 to 19, Concession 4, Part Lots 17 to 21, Concession 5 Seaton Community A brief question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee and Staff regarding: provisions for commercial zoning needed on the subject lands to include local amenities, such as hair salons and convenience stores for the Seaton community along the south of Taunton Road. Staff advised that there is mixed corridor lands for potential additional commercial developments in the core of the Seaton area; impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the retail market which has resulted in a reduction of the retail area, and commercial zoning, with an increase of mixed use residential and commercial applications; and, projections for achieving employment targets as it pertains to the Seaton community, with Staff advising they would look into what information is available and provide an update to Council prior to the April 26th Council Meeting. Recommendation: Moved by Councillor McLean Seconded by Councillor Pickles 1.That Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2015-03 (R), submitted by Seaton TFPM Inc. on lands being Part Lots 17 to 19, Concession 4, Part Lots 17 to 21, Concession 5, to establish a residential plan of subdivision on the Phase 1A lands consisting of 246 detached dwellings, 92 street townhouses and 15 rear lane townhouses for a total of 353 dwelling units, as shown on Attachment #3 to Report PLN 16-21, and the implementing conditions of approval, as set out in Appendix I, be endorsed; and, 2.That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 05/15 (R), submitted by Seaton TFPM Inc., to implement Phase 1A of Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2015-03(R) on lands being Part Lots 17 to 19, Concession 4, Part Lots 17 to 21, Concession 5, be endorsed subject to the provisions contained in Appendix II to Report PLN 16-21, and that staff be authorized to finalize and forward an implementing Zoning By-law to Council for enactment. Carried - 57 - Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner 11 5.3 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 17-21 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2019-03 Draft Plan of Condominium Application CP-2019-04 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 13/19 10046043 Canada Inc. & C. Wang Lots 14, 29 and 30, Part of Lots 22 to 26 Plan 818, Part 4 of 40R-29018, Part 1 of 40R-29545, Part 2 of 40R-30489 and Part 1 of 40R-30492 (1950 and 1952 Fairport Road) A question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee and Staff regarding: concerns over the historical tree cutting by the previous owner, parking on protected lands, as well as fencing, erosion and soil contamination; the long term effects of the soil contamination, and guarantee that restorative actions would take place prior to development approval; confirmation that the current owner is prepared to replant trees removed by the previous owner, prior to final approval of the draft plan; TRCA’s involvement through the entire application process; whether any soil samples had been taken on the site and whether the soil contamination was related to the dumping of construction materials, or hazardous materials. Staff advised that the extract of the Phase Two ESA can be provided, which outlined that the contaminated soil does not pertain to hazardous materials; how the land may have been part of a wetland and prone to flooding in the past; ensuring the replanted 100 trees, for compensation of the 20 trees removed from within the City of Pickering’s Tree Protection Area, are healthy trees to compensate for the mature trees that were lost; ensuring the applicant was responsible and responsive to the concerns of adjacent land owners, and that the developer complies with the site plan requirements; how enhancements of extra yard, and lot coverage provide connectivity and walkability opportunities; appreciation for the revisions to increase visitor parking, protection of Dunbarton Creek, as well as mitigation of traffic flow matters; and traffic flow issues being addressed, and the applicant’s willingness to listen to the community on a number of issues such as road widening, protection of the Creek, and increasing visitor parking. - 58 - Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner 12 Members of Committee asked Susan Cassel, City Clerk, for clarification regarding the procedural process if Committee were to defeat the recommendation, and how that would be presented to Council. Ms. Cassel advised that if the motion lost, it would not be included in the Committee Report on the Council agenda. She provided that the Committee could refer the matter for decision directly to Council at its Meeting scheduled for April 26, 2021, to allow the opportunity for further clarification and to address any outstanding concerns. A further question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee and Staff regarding: the definition of a wetland marsh, in accordance with TRCA guidelines. Staff confirmed that a detailed Environmental Impact Study (EIS) was conducted and that TRCA had staked the limits of the natural heritage feature and did not encounter or identify that a wetland had been in place; confirmation that engineering fill would need to be brought in, including the requirement of the applicant to submit a Record of Site Condition indicating the lands have been remediated of any contamination before final approval of the draft plan of subdivision; the process under the Planning Act regarding the ability to appeal Council’s decision on this matter and comparisons and outcomes of prior application appeals that had gone before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT); the previous construction of drainage pipes running through properties which have been identified. Staff advised that the applicant completed a site servicing and storm water management report with a detailed grading and site servicing plan coming forward at the site plan review stage; whether proposed development is in compliance with the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines, including access to sidewalks, connectivity, and in proximity to Bonita Park; whether Bonita Park meets the needs of the community, with staff advising that it currently meets the needs, but that staff would examine opportunities to enhance the park and add features for potential incl usion in 2022 Budget; the difference between a condominium community versus typical interior detached communities; the planning principles applied by Staff in making this recommendation to the Committee, the TRCA’s involvement and indication of no concern s, the requirement to conduct environmental site assessments, and other technical provisions that had been addressed; and, the ability to have clarity on the concerns raised prior to this report being considered by Council on April 26th. - 59 - Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner 13 Recommendation: Moved by Councillor McLean Seconded by Mayor Ryan 1.That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 13/19, submitted by 10046043 Canada Inc. and C. Wang, to facilitate a residential common element condominium development consisting of 27 detached dwellings and 3 lots for detached dwellings fronting Fairport Road, on lands located on the west side of Fairport Road, south of Taplin Drive, be approved and that the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN 17-21 be finalized and forwarded to Council; and, 2.That Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2019-03, submitted by 10046043 Canada Inc. and C. Wang, to establish 3 lots for detached dwellings fronting Fairport Road, a single development block to permit a residential common element condominium, an open space block, a road widening, and 2 blocks for future development, as shown on Attachment #4 to Report PLN 17-21, and the implementing conditions of approval, as set out in Appendix II, be endorsed. Note: The disposition of this matter, Item 5.3, was determined through the referral motion below. Moved by Mayor Ryan Seconded by Councillor McLean That Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 17-21, regarding Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2019-03, Draft Plan of Condominium Application CP-2019-04, Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 13/19, submitted by 10046043 Canada Inc. & C. Wang, (1950 and 1952 Fairport Road), be referred to Council at its Regular Meeting on April 26, 2021. Carried 5.4 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 18-21 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 03/21 City Initiated Part of Lot 18, Concession 9 S, Part of Lot 2, Plan 12 (5015 Brock Road) Recommendation: - 60 - Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner 14 Moved by Councillor Pickles Seconded by Councillor Butt That City Initiated Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 03/21 to amend By- law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06, to zone lands municipally known as 5015 Brock Road from “Oak Ridges Moraine – General Commercial (ORM-C2)” Zone to “ORM-C2-1” Zone restoring the residential use rights of a maximum of 4 dwelling units, be endorsed, and that the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN18-21 be finalized and forwarded to Council. Carried 5.5 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 19-21 Official Plan Amendment OPA 20-005/P Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 09/20 Mattamy (Seaton) Limited Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 3, Now Parts 1 and 2, 40R-24268 and Part of Lot 3, 40R-29614 (1034 Reflection Place) Recommendation: Moved by Councillor Butt Seconded by Councillor Pickles 1.That Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 20 -005/P, submitted by Mattamy (Seaton) Limited, to reduce the minimum net residential density from 203 to 70 units per net hectare for the lands located on the southwest corner of Taunton Road and Sapphire Drive to allow a residential condominium development to be approved, and that the draft by-law to adopt Amendment 42 to the Pickering Official Plan as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN 19-21 be forwarded to Council for enactment; and, 2.That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 09/20, submitted by Mattamy (Seaton) Limited, to permit a residential condominium development, be approved, and that the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as set out in Appendix II to Report PLN 19 -21 be forwarded to Council. Carried 6.Other Business - 61 - Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes April 6, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner 15 There was no other business. 7.Adjournment Moved by Councillor McLean Seconded by Councillor Butt That the meeting be adjourned. Carried The meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. - 62 - If you require this information in an accessible format, please contact 1-800-372-1102 extension 2097. March 25, 2021 Mr. Keith Creel President and Chief Executive Officer CP Rail 7550 Ogden Dale Road S.E. Calgary, AB T2C 4X9 Dear Mr. Creel: RE: CP Railway Traffic Information and Data (2021-P-6), Our File: D00 Council of the Region of Durham, at its meeting held on March 24, 2021, adopted the following recommendations of the Planning & Economic Development Committee: “That Regional Council endorse the following draft resolution contained in Attachment #1 to Report #2021-P-6 of the Commissioner of Planning and Economic Development requesting that CP Rail reconsider its decision to stop providing railway traffic information and data to the public: Whereas sound is considered by the Environmental Protection Act to be a contaminant which causes negative effects on human health; Whereas the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) states that planning for land uses in the vicinity of rail facilities should be undertaken in a manner that ensures that rail facilities and sensitive land uses are appropriately designed, buffered and/or separated from each other; Whereas the PPS also directs municipalities to avoid land use patterns and development which may cause environmental or public health and safety concerns; Whereas, Environmental Noise Assessment Studies, prepared in accordance with Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks guidelines require accurate and up-to-date data to accurately assess the impacts of railway noise on new development and identify appropriate mitigation measures; Now therefore, be it resolved that the Region of Durham is requesting that CP Rail reconsider its decision to cease providing railway traffic information to the noise consultants; and The Regional Municipality of Durham Corporate Services Department Legislative Services 605 Rossland Rd. E. Level 1 PO Box 623 Whitby, ON L1N 6A3 Canada 905-668-7711 1-800-372-1102 Fax: 905-668-9963 durham.ca Don Beaton, BCom, M.P.A. Commissioner of Corporate Services Corr. 17-21 - 63 - Page 2 of 2 That a copy of this motion be forwarded to CP Rail; the area municipalities; the Minister of Transport; Durham MPs and MPPs; the Association of Municipalities Ontario (AMO); and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM).” Ralph Walton Ralph Walton, Regional Clerk/Director of Legislative Services RW/tf c: The Honourable Omar Alghabra, Minister of Transport N. Cooper, Clerk, Town of Ajax B. Jamieson, Clerk, Township of Brock J. Gallagher, Clerk, Municipality of Clarington M. Medeiros, Clerk, City of Oshawa S. Cassel, Clerk, City of Pickering L. Fleury, Acting Clerk, Township of Scugog D. Leroux, Clerk, Township of Uxbridge C. Harris, Clerk, Town of Whitby Jennifer O’Connell, MP (Pickering/Uxbridge) Mark Holland, MP (Ajax) Ryan Turnbull, MP (Whitby) Dr. Colin Carrie, MP (Oshawa) Erin O’Toole, MP (Durham) Jamie Schmale, MP (Haliburton/Kawartha Lakes/Brock) Philip Lawrence, MP (Northumberland-Peterborough South) Peter Bethlenfalvy, MPP (Pickering/Uxbridge) Rod Phillips, MPP (Ajax) Lorne Coe, MPP (Whitby) Jennifer French, MPP (Oshawa) Lindsey Park, MPP (Durham) Laurie Scott, MPP (Haliburton/Kawartha Lakes/Brock) David Piccini, MPP (Northumberland-Peterborough South) Association of Municipalities Ontario (AMO) Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) B. Bridgeman, Commissioner of Planning and Economic Development - 64 - From: AMO Communications <Communicate@amo.on.ca> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 12:24 PM To: Cassel, Susan <scassel@pickering.ca> Subject: One-Time Doubling of Gas Tax Funds in 2021 AMO Policy Update not displaying correctly? View the online version Add Communicate@amo.on.ca to your safe list March 26, 2021 One-Time Doubling of Gas Tax Funds in 2021 Pending approval of Bill C-25, the federal government’s announcement that it will top- up the federal Gas Tax Fund with a one-time transfer of $2.2 billion is welcome news. As with the previous top-up in 2019, AMO will not be taking an administration fee. You can find your community’s allocation for 2021 here. All funds are to be used in accordance with your current agreement with AMO for the transfer of federal Gas Tax funds. We will update you as soon as we receive confirmation on the timing of these payments. Contact: Chris VanDooren, Program Manager, cvandooren@amo.on.ca, 416-971- 9856 ext. 410. *Disclaimer: The Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) is unable to provide any warranty regarding the accuracy or completeness of third-party submissions. Distribution of these items does not imply an endorsement of the views, information or services mentioned. Please consider the environment before printing this. Association of Municipalities of Ontario 200 University Ave. Suite 801,Toronto ON Canada M5H 3C6 To unsubscribe, please click here Corr. 18-21 - 65 - Estimated AMO Allocations of the federal Gas Tax Fund in 2021 Municipality Scheduled Allocation Top-Up Allocation Total Allocation Bruce, County of 2,108,772 $ 2,027,223 $ 4,135,995 $ Arran-Elderslie, Municipality of 215,758 207,414 423,173 Brockton, Municipality of 300,057 288,453 588,510 Huron-Kinloss, Township of 224,194 215,524 439,719 Kincardine, Municipality of 361,204 347,236 708,439 Northern Bruce Peninsula, Municipality of 126,829 121,924 248,753 Saugeen Shores, Town of 434,973 418,152 853,126 South Bruce Peninsula, Town of 266,915 256,593 523,507 South Bruce, Municipality of 178,842 171,926 350,767 Dufferin, County of 1,957,935 $ 1,882,218 $ 3,840,153 $ Amaranth, Township of 129,366 124,363 253,729 East Garafraxa, Township of 81,793 78,630 160,424 Grand Valley, Town of 93,750 90,125 183,875 Melancthon, Township of 95,399 91,710 187,109 Mono, Town of 273,036 262,477 535,513 Mulmur, Township of 110,305 106,040 216,345 Orangeville, Town of 916,568 881,123 1,797,691 Shelburne, Town of 257,717 247,751 505,468 Durham, Regional Municipality of 20,479,458 $ 19,687,484 $ 40,166,942 $ Ajax, Town of 3,795,574 3,648,793 7,444,368 Brock, Township of 369,228 354,949 724,177 Clarington, Municipality of 2,918,206 2,805,355 5,723,561 Oshawa, City of 5,057,235 4,861,663 9,918,898 Pickering, City of 2,910,531 2,797,976 5,708,508 Scugog, Township of 685,586 659,074 1,344,660 Uxbridge, Township of 671,600 645,628 1,317,228 Whitby, Town of 4,071,496 3,914,045 7,985,541 Elgin, County of 1,587,946 $ 1,526,538 $ 3,114,484 $ Aylmer, Town of 237,610 228,421 466,031 Bayham, Municipality of 234,565 225,494 460,060 Central Elgin, Municipality of 399,833 384,371 784,204 Dutton/Dunwich, Municipality of 122,611 117,869 240,480 Malahide, Township of 294,697 283,301 577,998 Southwold, Township of 140,213 134,790 275,003 West Elgin, Municipality of 158,417 152,291 310,708 Prepared 2021-03-26 Page 1 of 13- 66 - Estimated AMO Allocations of the federal Gas Tax Fund in 2021 Municipality Scheduled Allocation Top-Up Allocation Total Allocation Essex, County of 5,757,252 $ 5,534,610 $ 11,291,861 $ Amherstburg, Town of 695,704 668,800 1,364,503 Essex, Town of 647,845 622,792 1,270,638 Kingsville, Town of 683,525 657,092 1,340,617 Lakeshore, Municipality of 1,161,123 1,116,221 2,277,344 LaSalle, Town of 957,163 920,148 1,877,312 Leamington, Municipality of 875,180 841,335 1,716,515 Tecumseh, Town of 736,711 708,221 1,444,933 Frontenac, County of 846,065 $ 813,346 $ 1,659,412 $ Central Frontenac, Township of 138,690 133,327 272,017 Frontenac Islands, Township of 55,819 53,660 109,479 North Frontenac, Township of 60,195 57,868 118,063 South Frontenac, Township of 591,361 568,492 1,159,853 Grey, County of 2,975,833 $ 2,860,753 $ 5,836,585 $ Chatsworth, Township of 210,271 202,140 412,411 Georgian Bluffs, Township of 332,343 319,491 651,834 Grey Highlands, Municipality of 310,935 298,911 609,846 Hanover, Town of 243,826 234,397 478,223 Meaford, Municipality of 348,581 335,101 683,682 Owen Sound, City of 676,833 650,659 1,327,492 Southgate, Township of 233,233 224,214 457,447 The Blue Mountains, Town of 222,799 214,183 436,982 West Grey, Municipality of 397,010 381,657 778,668 Haliburton, County of 572,839 $ 550,686 $ 1,123,526 $ Algonquin Highlands, Township of 74,562 71,679 146,241 Dysart Et Al, Municipality of 199,171 191,469 390,640 Highlands East, Municipality of 106,024 101,924 207,947 Minden Hills, Township of 193,082 185,615 378,697 Halton, Region of 17,393,700 $ 16,721,058 $ 34,114,758 $ Burlington, City of 5,813,832 5,589,001 11,402,833 Halton Hills, Town of 1,939,730 1,864,718 3,804,448 Milton, Town of 3,492,726 3,357,657 6,850,383 Oakville, Town of 6,147,412 5,909,681 12,057,093 Prepared 2021-03-26 Page 2 of 13- 67 - Estimated AMO Allocations of the federal Gas Tax Fund in 2021 Municipality Scheduled Allocation Top-Up Allocation Total Allocation Hastings, County of 1,256,808 $ 1,208,205 $ 2,465,013 $ Bancroft, Town of 123,087 118,327 241,413 Carlow/Mayo, Township of 27,402 26,342 53,744 Centre Hastings, Municipality of 151,408 145,553 296,961 Deseronto, Town of 56,263 54,087 110,350 Faraday, Township of 44,433 42,715 87,148 Hastings Highlands, Municipality of 129,334 124,333 253,667 Limerick, Township of 10,973 10,549 21,523 Madoc, Township of 65,904 63,355 129,260 Marmora and Lake, Municipality of 125,370 120,522 245,892 Stirling-Rawdon, Township of 154,833 148,846 303,679 Tudor & Cashel, Township of 18,585 17,866 36,451 Tweed, Municipality of 191,686 184,274 375,960 Tyendinaga, Township of 136,280 131,010 267,290 Wollaston, Township of 21,249 20,427 41,677 Huron, County of 1,880,613 $ 1,807,887 $ 3,688,501 $ Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh, Township of 171,960 165,310 337,269 Bluewater, Municipality of 226,319 217,567 443,887 Central Huron, Municipality of 240,274 230,982 471,256 Goderich, Town of 241,923 232,568 474,491 Howick, Township of 122,833 118,083 240,915 Huron East, Municipality of 289,813 278,606 568,419 Morris-Turnberry, Municipality of 110,876 106,588 217,465 North Huron, Township of 156,419 150,370 306,789 South Huron, Municipality of 320,196 307,814 628,010 Lambton, County of 3,913,618 $ 3,762,272 $ 7,675,890 $ Brooke-Alvinston, Municipality of 76,465 73,508 149,973 Dawn-Euphemia, Township of 62,384 59,971 122,355 Enniskillen, Township of 88,676 85,246 173,922 Lambton Shores, Municipality of 337,164 324,125 661,289 Oil Springs, Village of 20,551 19,757 40,308 Petrolia, Town of 182,108 175,066 357,174 Plympton-Wyoming, Town of 247,220 237,659 484,879 Point Edward, Village of 64,604 62,105 126,709 Sarnia, City of 2,270,615 2,182,806 4,453,421 St. Clair, Township of 446,740 429,464 876,203 Warwick, Township of 117,092 112,564 229,657 Prepared 2021-03-26 Page 3 of 13- 68 - Estimated AMO Allocations of the federal Gas Tax Fund in 2021 Municipality Scheduled Allocation Top-Up Allocation Total Allocation Lanark, County of 1,900,309 $ 1,826,821 $ 3,727,129 $ Beckwith, Township of 242,431 233,055 475,486 Carleton Place, Town of 337,576 324,521 662,098 Drummond/North Elmsley, Township of 246,522 236,988 483,510 Lanark Highlands, Township of 169,295 162,749 332,044 Mississippi Mills, Municipality of 417,467 401,322 818,789 Montague, Township of 119,281 114,668 233,949 Perth, Town of 188,071 180,798 368,869 Tay Valley, Township of 179,666 172,718 352,385 Leeds & Grenville, United Counties of 2,214,320 $ 2,128,689 $ 4,343,009 $ Athens, Township of 95,558 91,862 187,420 Augusta, Township of 233,202 224,183 457,385 Edwardsburgh/Cardinal, Township of 224,956 216,256 441,212 Elizabethtown-Kitley, Township of 312,521 300,435 612,957 Front of Yonge, Township of 82,681 79,484 162,165 Leeds and the Thousand Islands, Township of 300,184 288,575 588,759 Merrickville-Wolford, Village of 97,270 93,509 190,779 North Grenville, Municipality of 521,746 501,569 1,023,315 Rideau Lakes, Township of 327,491 314,826 642,317 Westport, Village of 18,712 17,988 36,700 Lennox & Addington, County of 1,360,200 $ 1,307,598 $ 2,667,798 $ Addington Highlands, Township of 73,674 70,825 144,499 Greater Napanee, Town of 504,017 484,526 988,543 Loyalist, Township of 538,238 517,423 1,055,661 Stone Mills, Township of 244,270 234,824 479,094 Middlesex, County of 2,269,251 $ 2,181,495 $ 4,450,746 $ Adelaide Metcalfe, Township of 94,828 91,161 185,989 Lucan Biddulph, Township of 149,061 143,297 292,358 Middlesex Centre, Municipality of 547,467 526,296 1,073,763 Newbury, Village of 14,779 14,208 28,987 North Middlesex, Municipality of 201,455 193,664 395,119 Southwest Middlesex, Municipality of 181,506 174,487 355,993 Strathroy-Caradoc, Municipality of 661,800 636,207 1,298,007 Thames Centre, Municipality of 418,355 402,176 820,531 Prepared 2021-03-26 Page 4 of 13- 69 - Estimated AMO Allocations of the federal Gas Tax Fund in 2021 Municipality Scheduled Allocation Top-Up Allocation Total Allocation Muskoka, District Municipality of 1,915,310 $ 1,841,242 $ 3,756,552 $ Bracebridge, Town of 507,760 488,124 995,883 Georgian Bay, Township of 79,256 76,191 155,447 Gravenhurst, Town of 390,445 375,346 765,791 Huntsville, Town of 628,467 604,164 1,232,631 Lake of Bays, Township of 100,442 96,558 197,000 Muskoka Lakes, Township of 208,939 200,859 409,799 Niagara, Region of 14,204,837 $ 13,655,513 $ 27,860,349 $ Fort Erie, Town of 973,972 936,307 1,910,280 Grimsby, Town of 866,268 832,768 1,699,035 Lincoln, Town of 754,408 725,234 1,479,643 Niagara Falls, City of 2,793,185 2,685,168 5,478,354 Niagara-on-the-Lake, Town of 555,364 533,887 1,089,251 Pelham, Town of 542,646 521,661 1,064,308 Port Colborne, City of 580,578 558,126 1,138,703 St. Catharines, City of 4,221,699 4,058,439 8,280,138 Thorold, City of 596,277 573,218 1,169,494 Wainfleet, Township of 202,089 194,274 396,363 Welland, City of 1,658,481 1,594,344 3,252,825 West Lincoln, Township of 459,870 442,086 901,956 Northumberland, County of 2,699,055 $ 2,594,678 $ 5,293,733 $ Alnwick/Haldimand, Township of 217,851 209,427 427,278 Brighton, Municipality of 375,634 361,108 736,742 Cobourg, Town of 616,543 592,700 1,209,242 Cramahe, Township of 201,550 193,756 395,305 Hamilton, Township of 347,027 333,607 680,634 Port Hope, Municipality of 531,324 510,777 1,042,101 Trent Hills, Municipality of 409,125 393,304 802,429 Oxford, County of 3,516,005 $ 3,380,036 $ 6,896,041 $ Blandford-Blenheim, Township of 234,660 225,586 460,246 East Zorra-Tavistock, Township of 226,097 217,354 443,451 Ingersoll, Town of 404,590 388,944 793,534 Norwich, Township of 348,898 335,406 684,304 South-West Oxford, Township of 243,065 233,665 476,730 Tillsonburg, Town of 503,383 483,916 987,299 Woodstock, City of 1,297,213 1,247,048 2,544,261 Zorra, Township of 258,098 248,117 506,215 Prepared 2021-03-26 Page 5 of 13- 70 - Estimated AMO Allocations of the federal Gas Tax Fund in 2021 Municipality Scheduled Allocation Top-Up Allocation Total Allocation Peel, Region of 43,822,064 $ 42,127,394 $ 85,949,459 $ Brampton, City of 18,827,320 18,099,237 36,926,558 Caledon, Town of 2,109,121 2,027,558 4,136,679 Mississauga, City of 22,885,623 22,000,599 44,886,222 Perth, County of 1,207,269 $ 1,160,582 $ 2,367,851 $ North Perth, Municipality of 416,420 400,316 816,736 Perth East, Township of 388,859 373,822 762,681 Perth South, Township of 120,835 116,162 236,997 West Perth, Municipality of 281,155 270,282 551,437 Peterborough, County of 1,769,166 $ 1,700,750 $ 3,469,916 $ Asphodel-Norwood, Township of 130,318 125,278 255,596 Cavan Monaghan, Township of 280,013 269,185 549,198 Douro-Dummer, Township of 212,777 204,549 417,325 Havelock-Belmont-Methuen, Township of 143,670 138,114 281,783 North Kawartha, Township of 78,622 75,581 154,203 Otonabee-South Monaghan, Township of 211,540 203,359 414,900 Selwyn, Township of 541,061 520,137 1,061,197 Trent Lakes, Municipality of 171,167 164,547 335,714 Prescott & Russell, United Counties of 2,833,210 $ 2,723,645 $ 5,556,855 $ Alfred and Plantagenet, Township of 307,003 295,130 602,133 Casselman, Municipality of 112,525 108,174 220,699 Champlain, Township of 276,112 265,434 541,547 Clarence-Rockland, City of 777,402 747,338 1,524,740 East Hawkesbury, Township of 104,533 100,491 205,024 Hawkesbury, Town of 325,493 312,905 638,398 Russell, Township of 523,934 503,673 1,027,607 The Nation Municipality 406,208 390,499 796,707 Prepared 2021-03-26 Page 6 of 13- 71 - Estimated AMO Allocations of the federal Gas Tax Fund in 2021 Municipality Scheduled Allocation Top-Up Allocation Total Allocation Renfrew, County of 2,793,217 $ 2,685,199 $ 5,478,416 $ Admaston/Bromley, Township of 93,084 89,484 182,568 Arnprior, Town of 278,935 268,148 547,083 Bonnechere Valley, Township of 116,521 112,015 228,537 Brudenell, Lyndoch and Raglan, Township of 47,668 45,824 93,492 Deep River, Town of 130,318 125,278 255,596 Greater Madawaska, Township of 79,859 76,770 156,629 Head, Clara & Maria, United Townships of 7,865 7,561 15,427 Horton, Township of 91,562 88,021 179,582 Killaloe, Hagarty & Richards, Township of 76,751 73,783 150,533 Laurentian Hills, Town of 93,909 90,277 184,186 Laurentian Valley, Township of 297,710 286,197 583,907 Madawaska Valley, Township of 130,762 125,705 256,466 McNab/Braeside, Township of 227,651 218,848 446,499 North Algona Wilberforce, Township of 92,450 88,874 181,324 Petawawa, Town of 545,088 524,009 1,069,097 Renfrew, Town of 260,794 250,708 511,502 Whitewater Region, Township of 222,292 213,695 435,987 Simcoe, County of 9,689,487 $ 9,314,779 $ 19,004,265 $ Adjala-Tosorontio, Township of 348,074 334,613 682,687 Bradford West Gwillimbury, Town of 1,120,338 1,077,013 2,197,350 Clearview, Township of 448,801 431,445 880,246 Collingwood, Town of 691,168 664,440 1,355,608 Essa, Township of 668,651 642,793 1,311,443 Innisfil, Town of 1,159,696 1,114,849 2,274,545 Midland, Town of 534,844 514,161 1,049,005 New Tecumseth, Town of 1,085,990 1,043,993 2,129,984 Oro-Medonte, Township of 667,160 641,360 1,308,520 Penetanguishene, Town of 284,231 273,240 557,471 Ramara, Township of 300,913 289,277 590,190 Severn, Township of 427,425 410,896 838,321 Springwater, Township of 604,459 581,084 1,185,543 Tay, Township of 318,198 305,893 624,091 Tiny, Township of 373,827 359,370 733,197 Wasaga Beach, Town of 655,711 630,353 1,286,064 Prepared 2021-03-26 Page 7 of 13- 72 - Estimated AMO Allocations of the federal Gas Tax Fund in 2021 Municipality Scheduled Allocation Top-Up Allocation Total Allocation Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry, United Counties of 2,072,680 $ 1,992,527 $ 4,065,207 $ North Dundas, Township of 357,684 343,851 701,535 North Glengarry, Township of 320,608 308,210 628,819 North Stormont, Township of 217,978 209,549 427,527 South Dundas, Municipality of 343,570 330,284 673,854 South Glengarry, Township of 417,054 400,926 817,980 South Stormont, Township of 415,786 399,707 815,492 Waterloo, Region of 16,972,491 $ 16,316,138 $ 33,288,629 $ Cambridge, City of 4,120,433 3,961,089 8,081,522 Kitchener, City of 7,396,672 7,110,630 14,507,302 North Dumfries, Township of 323,970 311,442 635,412 Waterloo, City of 3,329,647 3,200,884 6,530,531 Wellesley, Township of 357,113 343,303 700,415 Wilmot, Township of 651,588 626,390 1,277,978 Woolwich, Township of 793,069 762,400 1,555,469 Wellington, County of 2,883,922 $ 2,772,396 $ 5,656,319 $ Centre Wellington, Township of 894,082 859,506 1,753,588 Erin, Town of 362,790 348,760 711,550 Guelph/Eramosa, Township of 407,667 391,901 799,568 Mapleton, Township of 333,865 320,954 654,820 Minto, Town of 275,002 264,367 539,369 Puslinch, Township of 232,662 223,665 456,327 Wellington North, Township of 377,854 363,242 741,096 York, Regional Municipality of 35,192,657 $ 33,831,700 $ 69,024,356 $ Aurora, Town of 1,758,447 1,690,445 3,448,891 East Gwillimbury, Town of 760,878 731,454 1,492,332 Georgina, Town of 1,440,439 1,384,735 2,825,174 King, Township of 777,402 747,338 1,524,740 Markham, City of 10,433,207 10,029,738 20,462,945 Newmarket, Town of 2,671,177 2,567,878 5,239,055 Richmond Hill, City of 6,185,153 5,945,963 12,131,115 Vaughan, City of 9,712,227 9,336,639 19,048,866 Whitchurch-Stouffville, Town of 1,453,727 1,397,509 2,851,237 Prepared 2021-03-26 Page 8 of 13- 73 - Estimated AMO Allocations of the federal Gas Tax Fund in 2021 Municipality Scheduled Allocation Top-Up Allocation Total Allocation Single-Tier Municipalities Alberton, Township of 61,464 $ 59,087 $ 120,551 $ Armour, Township of 89,690 86,222 175,912 Armstrong, Township of 73,960 71,100 145,059 Assiginack, Township of 64,255 61,770 126,025 Atikokan, Town of 174,624 167,871 342,494 Baldwin, Township of 38,375 36,891 75,267 Barrie, City of 8,971,202 8,624,271 17,595,473 Belleville, City of 3,216,931 3,092,527 6,309,459 Billings, Township of 38,248 36,769 75,018 Black River-Matheson, Township of 154,643 148,663 303,306 Blind River, Town of 220,230 211,713 431,943 Bonfield, Township of 126,226 121,345 247,571 Brant, County of 2,328,336 2,238,296 4,566,632 Brantford, City of 6,184,201 5,945,048 12,129,249 Brethour, Township of 7,865 7,561 15,427 Brockville, City of 1,353,983 1,301,623 2,655,606 Bruce Mines, Town of 36,916 35,489 72,405 Burk's Falls, Village of 62,225 59,819 122,044 Burpee and Mills, Township of 21,757 20,915 42,672 Callander, Municipality of 245,031 235,556 480,587 Calvin, Municipality of 32,730 31,464 64,194 Carling, Township of 71,359 68,600 139,959 Casey, Township of 23,342 22,440 45,782 Central Manitoulin, Municipality of 132,189 127,077 259,266 Chamberlain, Township of 21,059 20,244 41,303 Chapleau, Township of 124,577 119,760 244,337 Chapple, Township of 40,469 38,904 79,372 Charlton and Dack, Municipality of 43,513 41,830 85,344 Chatham-Kent, Municipality of 6,447,500 6,198,165 12,645,666 Chisholm, Township of 81,889 78,722 160,610 Cobalt, Town of 71,549 68,782 140,332 Cochrane, Town of 337,513 324,461 661,973 Coleman, Township of 37,741 36,282 74,023 Conmee, Township of 51,949 49,940 101,890 Cornwall, City of 2,955,155 2,840,874 5,796,029 Dawson, Township of 29,685 28,537 58,223 Dorion, Township of 20,044 19,269 39,313 Dryden, City of 491,521 472,514 964,035 Dubreuilville, Township of 38,883 37,379 76,262 Prepared 2021-03-26 Page 9 of 13- 74 - Estimated AMO Allocations of the federal Gas Tax Fund in 2021 Municipality Scheduled Allocation Top-Up Allocation Total Allocation Ear Falls, Township of 63,113 $ 60,672 $ 123,786 $ East Ferris, Municipality of 308,398 296,472 604,870 Elliot Lake, City of 681,305 654,958 1,336,263 Emo, Township of 84,553 81,283 165,835 Englehart, Town of 93,813 90,186 183,999 Espanola, Town of 320,196 307,814 628,010 Evanturel, Township of 28,480 27,379 55,859 Fauquier-Strickland, Township of 33,999 32,684 66,683 Fort Frances, Town of 490,887 471,904 962,791 French River, Municipality of 168,851 162,322 331,173 Gananoque, Separated Town of 327,237 314,582 641,819 Gauthier, Township of 8,753 8,415 17,168 Gillies, Township of 30,066 28,903 58,969 Gordon/Barrie Island, Municipality of 31,081 29,879 60,960 Gore Bay, Town of 54,994 52,867 107,861 Greater Sudbury, City of 10,245,961 9,849,733 20,095,694 Greenstone, Municipality of 294,063 282,691 576,754 Guelph, City of 8,359,734 8,036,449 16,396,183 Haldimand, County of 2,892,929 2,781,055 5,673,985 Hamilton, City of 34,056,810 32,739,778 66,796,588 Harley, Township of 34,950 33,599 68,549 Harris, Township of 34,570 33,233 67,802 Hearst, Town of 321,592 309,155 630,747 Hilliard, Township of 13,130 12,622 25,752 Hilton Beach, Village of 10,847 10,427 21,274 Hilton, Township of 19,473 18,720 38,193 Hornepayne, Township of 62,162 59,758 121,920 Hudson, Township of 31,905 30,672 62,577 Huron Shores, Municipality of 105,548 101,466 207,014 Ignace, Township of 76,243 73,295 149,538 Iroquois Falls, Town of 287,783 276,654 564,438 James, Township of 26,641 25,610 52,251 Jocelyn, Township of 19,854 19,086 38,940 Johnson, Township of 47,636 45,794 93,430 Joly, Township of 19,283 18,537 37,820 Kapuskasing, Town of 525,964 505,624 1,031,588 Kawartha Lakes, City of 4,784,104 4,599,095 9,383,199 Kearney, Town of 55,946 53,782 109,728 Kenora, City of 957,544 920,514 1,878,058 Kerns, Township of 22,708 21,830 44,538 Prepared 2021-03-26 Page 10 of 13- 75 - Estimated AMO Allocations of the federal Gas Tax Fund in 2021 Municipality Scheduled Allocation Top-Up Allocation Total Allocation Killarney, Municipality of 24,484 $ 23,537 $ 48,021 $ Kingston, City of 7,852,545 7,548,874 15,401,420 Kirkland Lake, Town of 506,237 486,660 992,898 La Vallee, Township of 59,498 57,197 116,694 Laird, Township of 66,412 63,843 130,255 Lake of the Woods, Township of 14,589 14,025 28,614 Larder Lake, Township of 46,304 44,513 90,818 Latchford, Town of 19,854 19,086 38,940 London, City of 24,345,947 23,404,450 47,750,397 MacDonald, Meredith & Aberdeen Add'l, Township of 102,059 98,113 200,172 Machar, Township of 55,946 53,782 109,728 Machin, Municipality of 61,591 59,209 120,800 Magnetawan, Municipality of 88,168 84,759 172,927 Manitouwadge, Township of 122,865 118,113 240,978 Marathon, Town of 207,607 199,579 407,186 Markstay-Warren, Municipality of 168,471 161,956 330,427 Matachewan, Township of 14,272 13,720 27,992 Mattawa, Town of 126,417 121,528 247,944 Mattawan, Municipality of 10,212 9,817 20,030 Mattice - Val Côté, Township of 41,103 39,513 80,616 McDougall, Municipality of 171,389 164,761 336,150 McGarry, Township of 38,629 37,135 75,764 McKellar, Township of 70,471 67,746 138,217 McMurrich/Monteith, Township of 52,267 50,245 102,512 Moonbeam, Township of 78,083 75,063 153,146 Moosonee, Town of 93,940 90,307 184,248 Morley, Township of 30,510 29,330 59,840 Nairn & Hyman, Township of 21,693 20,854 42,547 Neebing, Municipality of 130,349 125,308 255,658 Nipigon, Township of 104,153 100,125 204,277 Nipissing, Township of 108,276 104,088 212,364 Norfolk, County of 4,062,331 3,905,234 7,967,564 North Bay, City of 3,270,023 3,143,566 6,413,588 Northeastern Manitoulin and the Islands, Town of 172,023 165,371 337,394 O'Connor, Township of 42,054 40,428 82,482 Oliver-Paipoonge, Municipality of 375,634 361,108 736,742 Opasatika, Township of 14,335 13,781 28,116 Orillia, City of 1,976,869 1,900,420 3,877,289 Ottawa, City of 59,259,320 56,967,666 116,226,986 Papineau-Cameron, Township of 64,445 61,953 126,398 Prepared 2021-03-26 Page 11 of 13- 76 - Estimated AMO Allocations of the federal Gas Tax Fund in 2021 Municipality Scheduled Allocation Top-Up Allocation Total Allocation Parry Sound, Town of 406,461 $ 390,743 $ 797,204 $ Pelee, Township of 14,906 14,330 29,236 Pembroke, City of 880,540 846,488 1,727,027 Perry, Township of 155,658 149,638 305,296 Peterborough, City of 5,139,885 4,941,117 10,081,002 Pickle Lake, Township of 24,611 23,659 48,270 Plummer Additional, Township of 41,864 40,245 82,109 Powassan, Municipality of 219,152 210,677 429,828 Prescott, Town of 267,803 257,446 525,249 Prince Edward, County of 1,568,949 1,508,275 3,077,223 Prince, Township of 64,065 61,587 125,652 Quinte West, City of 2,764,102 2,657,210 5,421,313 Rainy River, Town of 51,188 49,209 100,397 Red Lake, Municipality of 260,508 250,434 510,942 Red Rock, Township of 56,770 54,575 111,345 Ryerson, Township of 41,103 39,513 80,616 Sables-Spanish Rivers, Township of 202,216 194,396 396,612 Sault Ste. Marie, City of 4,653,755 4,473,787 9,127,541 Schreiber, Township of 67,173 64,575 131,748 Seguin, Township of 273,004 262,447 535,451 Shuniah, Municipality of 177,478 170,615 348,093 Sioux Lookout, Municipality of 334,405 321,473 655,877 Sioux Narrows-Nestor Falls, Township of 35,965 34,574 70,539 Smiths Falls, Town of 556,918 535,381 1,092,299 Smooth Rock Falls, Town of 84,362 81,100 165,462 South Algonquin, Township of 69,520 66,831 136,351 South River, Village of 70,661 67,929 138,590 Spanish, Town of 45,162 43,416 88,578 St. Charles, Municipality of 80,493 77,380 157,873 St. Joseph, Township of 78,654 75,612 154,265 St. Marys, Town of 460,821 443,000 903,822 St. Thomas, City of 2,468,010 2,372,568 4,840,578 Stratford, City of 1,995,835 1,918,652 3,914,487 Strong, Township of 91,276 87,746 179,023 Sundridge, Village of 60,957 58,599 119,556 Tarbutt, Township of 33,872 32,562 66,434 Tehkummah, Township of 27,656 26,586 54,242 Temagami, Municipality of 50,871 48,904 99,775 Temiskaming Shores, City of 629,229 604,895 1,234,124 Terrace Bay, Township of 102,186 98,235 200,421 Prepared 2021-03-26 Page 12 of 13- 77 - Estimated AMO Allocations of the federal Gas Tax Fund in 2021 Municipality Scheduled Allocation Top-Up Allocation Total Allocation The Archipelago, Township of 33,681 $ 32,379 $ 66,060 $ The North Shore, Township of 31,525 30,306 61,831 Thessalon, Town of 81,571 78,417 159,988 Thornloe, Village of 7,104 6,829 13,934 Thunder Bay, City of 6,844,701 6,580,005 13,424,706 Timmins, City of 2,650,626 2,548,122 5,198,747 Val Rita-Harty, Township of 48,334 46,465 94,799 Wawa, Municipality of 184,265 177,139 361,404 West Nipissing, Municipality of 911,113 875,879 1,786,992 White River, Township of 40,913 39,330 80,243 Whitestone, Municipality of 58,102 55,855 113,957 Windsor, City of 13,776,301 13,243,550 27,019,851 Total 673,996,169 $ 647,931,646 $ 1,321,927,815 $ Prepared 2021-03-26 Page 13 of 13- 78 - If you require this information in an accessible format, please contact 1-800-372-1102 extension 2097. The Regional Municipality of Durham Corporate Services Department Legislative Services 605 Rossland Rd. E. Level 1 PO Box 623 Whitby, ON L1N 6A3 Canada 905-668-7711 1-800-372-1102 Fax: 905-668-9963 durham.ca Don Beaton, BCom, M.P.A. Commissioner of Corporate Services March 25, 2021 The Honourable Doug Ford Premier of Ontario Room 281 Legislative Building, Queen’s Park Toronto, ON M7A 1A1 Dear Premier Ford: RE: Motion to add Pharmacies in Durham Region to the Government of Ontario’s Pilot Project to Deliver the AstraZeneca Vaccine, Our File: P00 Council of the Region of Durham, at its meeting held on March 24, 2021, adopted the following recommendations: “Whereas the Biden administration is finalizing plans to send 1.5 million doses of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine to Canada as a loan; And whereas according to the Government of Canada’s Covid-19 tracker, at approximately 10:00 AM on March 24, 2021, 4,327,334 doses had been administered. In addition, 3,688,286 of Canadians have received at least one dose of an approved COVID-19 vaccine. 639,048 Canadians are fully vaccinated against COVID-19, having received both required doses; And whereas according to the Government of Ontario, 325 pharmacy sites, including Shoppers Drug Mart, Rexall and independent pharmacies, offer the AstraZeneca vaccine to eligible Ontarians 60-65 in Toronto, Windsor-Essex, and Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox & Addington; And whereas ensuring that Durham Region residents have local access to vaccines is crucial to mitigating the spread of COVID-19; Therefore be it resolved that: Pharmacies in Durham Region be added to the Government of Ontario’s pilot project immediately; and Corr. 19-21 - 79 - Page 2 of 2 That a copy of this motion be sent to the Premier of Ontario, the Minister of Health, Ontario Opposition Leaders, Durham Region MPPs and all eight local municipal Councils.” Ralph Walton Ralph Walton, Regional Clerk/Director of Legislative Services RW/ks c: Christine Elliot, Minister of Health Erin O’Toole, Conservative Party of Canada Rod Phillips, MPP (Ajax) Lindsey Park, MPP (Durham) Laurie Scott, MPP (Haliburton/Kawartha Lakes/Brock) David Piccini, MPP (Northumberland/Peterborough South) Jennifer French, MPP (Oshawa) Peter Bethlenfalvy, MPP (Pickering/Uxbridge) Lorne Coe, MPP (Whitby) Nicole Cooper, Clerk, Town of Ajax Becky Jamieson, Clerk, Township of Brock June Gallagher, Clerk, Municipality of Clarington Mary Medeiros, City Clerk, City of Oshawa Susan Cassel, Clerk, City of Pickering Leigh Fleury, Acting Clerk, Township of Scugog Debbie Leroux, Clerk, Township of Uxbridge Chris Harris, Clerk, Town of Whitby - 80 - From: Mallory Clyne <mclyne@bot.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 2:24 PM To: Mallory Clyne <mclyne@bot.com> Subject: New Report on Regional Rail for Recovery Importance: High Dear Mayor, As a leader in this important region, you know how essential efficient transportation systems are to our region’s competitiveness. The swift movement of people, goods and services is integral to economic growth and recovery. I am writing you today to share the Toronto Region Board of Trade’s latest report, “Getting on the Right Track: Connecting communities with regional rail.” The report posits that if we change the way we use our existing regional rail network we could create a transportation system that could connect communities right across our region with one another, providing capacity ten times that of the Yonge subway. By transforming the existing park-and-ride-oriented, predominantly unidirectional GO Transit commuter rail service into a bidirectional, all-day regional rail service fully integrated with local transit, our region’s transit system would match those of global cities like Paris and London, resulting in immense benefits including decreased emissions, improved equity, greater access to talent for employers, and increased investment attraction. You can find out more about the Toronto Region Board of Trade’s work on transportation, including our report on the benefits of fare integration, here. Thank you, Mallory Mallory Clyne Director, Strategic Initiatives Phone: 416 862 4501 mclyne@bot.com First Canadian Place | 77 Adelaide St. West, Suite 350 Toronto, ON M5X 1C1 bot.com | Manage Your Profile | Unsubscribe Corr. 20-21 - 81 - GETTING ON THE RIGHT TRACK Connecting Communities with Regional Rail March 2021 - 82 - Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 The Case for Regional Rail 7 Implementing a Regional Rail Network 18 Applying Best Practices: The Trillium Regional Rail Network 22 Trillium in Depth: Technical Details 24 Conclusion and Future Possibilities 51 Appendix: Corridor Maps 55 Endnotes 59 2- 83 - T …i/œÀœ˜ÌœÀi}ˆœ˜Li˜iwÌÃvÀœ“>˜ˆÀÀi«>Vi>Lii}>VÞœvÀ>ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀà À>`ˆ>̈˜}vÀœ“1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜°/…iÞ>Àiˆ˜Û>Õ>LiÀœÕÌiÃvœÀˆ˜Žˆ˜} ̜}i̅iÀ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜½ÃÀiÈ`i˜ÌÃ>˜`i“«œÞiÀð/…iÞ>ÀiLÕÀ}iœ˜ˆ˜} ÀœÕÌiÃvœÀœvv‡«i>ŽÌÀ>Ûi° ÕÌÜi…>Ûi˜œÌÞiÌLii˜>Li̜…>À˜iÃÃ̅iˆÀ vՏ«œÌi˜Ìˆ>°7…ˆi"/À>˜ÃˆÌÃiÀۈViÃ…>Ûiœ˜}ÌÀ>˜Ã«œÀÌi`Ìi˜Ãœv̅œÕÃ>˜`à œvܜÀŽiÀÃiÛiÀÞÜiiŽ`>Þ̜̅iˆÀœLȘ`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜/œÀœ˜Ìœ]̅iÃiVœÀÀˆ`œÀà VœÕ`Li“>`iÕÃivՏvœÀ>v>À܈`iÀÛ>ÀˆiÌÞœvÌÀˆ«Ã°,i>ˆâˆ˜}̅ˆÃ«œÌi˜Ìˆ>ˆÃ iëiVˆ>Þˆ“«œÀÌ>˜Ìˆ˜̅iÜ>Žiœv̅i "6 ‡£™«>˜`i“ˆV]>˜`̅˜}ˆÃ Àˆ}…Ì̜Vœ˜Ãˆ`iÀ̅iˆÀvՏ«œÌi˜Ìˆ>>ÃÜiLi}ˆ˜̜՘`iÀÃÌ>˜`…œÜ̅ivÕÌÕÀiœv ܜÀŽˆÃňv̈˜}Vœ““ÕÌiÀ«>ÌÌiÀ˜Ã°7iV>˜V…>˜}i̅i˜>ÀÀ>̈Ûiœ˜̅iLÕȘiÃà V>ÃivœÀ,i}ˆœ˜>,>ˆLÞˆ˜VÕ`ˆ˜}iVœ˜œ“ˆV>˜`ÃÕÃÌ>ˆ˜>LˆˆÌÞœLiV̈ÛiÃ>ë>ÀÌ œv̅iÛ>Õi«Àœ«œÃˆÌˆœ˜̜}œÛiÀ˜“i˜ÌÆ>˜`ÌÀ>˜ÃvœÀ“ˆ˜}̅iÛ>Õi«Àœ«œÃˆÌˆœ˜ vœÀVÕÃ̜“iÀÃÆÀiÃՏ̈˜}ˆ˜>Lˆ‡`ˆÀiV̈œ˜>]>`>ÞÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÃiÀۈVivՏÞ ˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`܈̅œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ]̅iÀ>ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃVœÕ`LiVœ“i>Ài}ˆœ˜>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ L>VŽLœ˜i̅>ÌܜՏ`Vœ˜ÌÀˆLÕÌi̜̅iiVœ˜œ“ˆVÃÕVViÃÃœv̅iÀi}ˆœ˜°Ƃà ̅i«ÀœÛˆ˜Vi“œÛiÃ>…i>`܈̅"iÝ«>˜Ãˆœ˜]̅ˆÃÀi«œÀÌLՈ`Ãœ˜̅ˆÃܜÀŽ >˜`>ÞÃœÕÌ>Vœ“«Ài…i˜ÃˆÛi«>˜vœÀ̅iˆ“«i“i˜Ì>̈œ˜œvÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ] …ˆ}…ˆ}…̈˜}LiÃÌ«À>V̈ViÃ̅>Ì…>ÛiLii˜ÕÃi`ˆ˜ÃÕVViÃÃvՏˆ“«i“i˜Ì>̈œ˜Ãœv Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ>ÀœÕ˜`̅iܜÀ`°ÌÃ}Ո`ˆ˜}«Àˆ˜Vˆ«iÃ>ÀiÌܜ‡Ü>Þ]>‡`>ÞÃiÀۈViÆ …ˆ}…vÀiµÕi˜VÞÆÃi>“iÃȘÌi}À>̈œ˜܈̅œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÆ>vœVÕÃœ˜iµÕˆÌÞÆ>˜` ˆ˜Ìi}À>̈œ˜܈̅Ài}ˆœ˜>«>˜˜ˆ˜}° Executive Summary NOVEMBER 2020 Erasing the Invisible Line: Integrating the Toronto Region’s Transit Networks ˆ}…ˆ}…̈˜}̅iˆ“«œÀÌ>˜Viœv>՘ˆwi`v>Ài ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi>˜`Vœ>LœÀ>̈Ûi>`“ˆ˜ˆÃÌÀ>̈œ˜̜ LÀi>Ž`œÜ˜L>ÀÀˆiÀȘ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜]̅ˆÃÀi«œÀÌ «Àœ«œÃi`̅iVÀi>̈œ˜œv>º/À>˜ÃˆÌi`iÀ>̈œ˜» vœÀ̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜° MARCH 2021 Getting on the Right Track: Connecting Communities with Regional Rail 1˜VœÛiÀˆ˜}̅ii˜œÀ“œÕëœÌi˜Ìˆ>œv Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆˆ˜̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜]>œ˜}܈̅ ̅i}œL>LiÃÌ«À>V̈ViÃ̅>ÌV>˜LiÕÃi`̜ ˆ“«ÀœÛiˆÌÃÛ>Õi>˜`ivviV̈Ûi˜iÃð SUMMER 2021 Solving the Last Mile œœŽˆ˜}>Ì̅iˆ“«œÀÌ>˜ViœvvÀiµÕi˜Ì >˜`Àiˆ>LiœV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÃiÀۈVi˜ii`i` ̜}iÌ«iœ«i̜>˜`vÀœ“̅iˆÀ…œ“ià >˜``iÃ̈˜>̈œ˜Ã]̅ˆÃÀi«œÀÌ܈œœŽ>Ì …œÜ̜VœÃi̅i}>«>ÀœÕ˜`̅iœvÌi˜ œÛiÀœœŽi`º>ÃÌ“ˆi»œvÌÀ>˜Ã«œÀÌ>̈œ˜° FALL 2021 Building Infrastructure /…ˆÃÀi«œÀÌ܈iÝ>“ˆ˜i…œÜ̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ ,i}ˆœ˜܈…>Ûi̜`iˆÛiÀ̈“iÞ>˜` VœÃ̇ivviV̈Ûiˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi]ˆvˆÌˆÃ̜Žii« Õ«܈̅ˆÌÃ}œL>«iiÀÃ>˜`“>݈“ˆâi̅i Û>Õiœvˆ˜ÛiÃ̓i˜Ì° /…ˆÃˆÃ̅iÃiVœ˜`ˆ˜>ÃiÀˆiÃœvvœÕÀvÀ>“iܜÀŽÃ̅>ÌVœiV̈ÛiÞ>ÞœÕÌ>ÃÌÀ>Ìi}ÞvœÀ>˜ ˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`]Vœ“«ï̈ÛiÌÀ>˜Ã«œÀÌ>̈œ˜ÃÞÃÌi“vœÀ̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜̅>Ì`À>ÜÃvÀœ“}œL>LiÃÌ «À>V̈Við/…i̅ˆÀ`>˜`vœÕÀ̅i`ˆÌˆœ˜Ãœv̅ˆÃÃiÀˆiÃ܈Li«ÕLˆÃ…i`ˆ˜̅i>ÌÌiÀ«>ÀÌœvÓäÓ£° CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 3- 84 - G "/À>˜ÃˆÌˆÃ œÀ̅Ƃ“iÀˆV>½Ã}Ài>ÌiÃÌVœ““ÕÌiÀÀ>ˆÃÕVViÃÃÃ̜ÀÞ°-ˆ˜Vi̅i>ŽiŜÀi ˆ˜iœ«i˜i`ˆ˜£™ÈÇ>Ã>˜iÝ«iÀˆ“i˜Ì̜ÀiˆiÛiVœ˜}iÃ̈œ˜œ˜̅i+ 7]"/À>˜ÃˆÌ …>ÃiÝ«>˜`i`ˆ˜Ìœ>Û>Ã̘iÌܜÀŽ°*ÀˆœÀ̜̅i>ÀÀˆÛ>œv "6 ‡£™]ˆÌÌÀ>˜Ã«œÀÌi`Ìi˜Ã œv̅œÕÃ>˜`Ãœv«iœ«iiÛiÀÞ“œÀ˜ˆ˜}̜̅iˆÀœLȘ`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜/œÀœ˜Ìœ>˜`L>VŽ >}>ˆ˜iÛiÀÞiÛi˜ˆ˜}°/…i}ÀœÜ̅œvVi˜ÌÀ>/œÀœ˜Ìœ>Ã>}œL>LÕȘiÃÃVi˜ÌÀiܜՏ`˜iÛiÀ…>Ûi Lii˜«œÃÈLi܈̅œÕÌ"°/…i…ˆ}…Ü>ÞÃ>˜`ÃÕLÜ>ޏˆ˜iÃvii`ˆ˜}̅i`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜VœÀi…>Ûi Lii˜>ÌV>«>VˆÌÞvœÀ`iV>`iÃp̅iœ˜Þ>``i`V>«>VˆÌÞ…>ÃLii˜œ˜"/À>˜ÃˆÌ° ƂÃ̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜«Ài«>ÀiÃ̜i˜ÌiÀ>«œÃ̇ "6 ܜÀ`]>`ˆvviÀi˜Ì“œ`iˆÃ˜ii`i` vœÀœÕÀÀi}ˆœ˜½ÃÀ>ˆ˜iÌܜÀŽ°ƂÌ>̈“i܅i˜“>˜ÞœvwViܜÀŽiÀÃ>ÀiVœ˜Ãˆ`iÀˆ˜}«iÀ“>˜i˜ÌÞ ňv̈˜}̅iˆÀܜÀŽ«>À̈>ÞœÀvՏÞ̜̅iˆÀ…œ“iÃ]܈̅>ÓÕV…>ÃÓx¯œv`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜Vœ““ÕÌiÀà œ˜">˜ÌˆVˆ«>Ìi`˜œÌ̜ÀiÌÕÀ˜«œÃ̇«>˜`i“ˆV]̅i˜iÌܜÀŽ½ÃvœVÕÃœ˜ÌÀ>`ˆÌˆœ˜>ÀÕÅ…œÕÀ Vœ““Ṏ˜}“>ޏˆ“ˆÌˆÌÃÀiVœÛiÀÞ° “«œÞ“i˜ÌˆÃV…>˜}ˆ˜}°ÌˆÃÃÌÀœ˜}iÀ̅>˜iÛiÀˆ˜“>˜Þ iÃÃi˜Ìˆ>ܜÀŽiÀÀœiÃ]ÃÕV…>Ã…i>Ì…V>Ài>˜`œ}ˆÃ̈VÃ]܅ˆV…Ìi˜`̜…>ÛiܜÀŽ…œÕÀÃ`ˆvviÀi˜Ì vÀœ“̅iÌÀ>`ˆÌˆœ˜>œvwVi«i>ŽÃ>˜`ܜÀŽœV>̈œ˜ÃœÕÌÈ`i̅i`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜VœÀi°/…ˆÃ“i>˜Ã ̅>Ì̅i"/À>˜ÃˆÌVÕÃ̜“iÀˆÃ>ÃœV…>˜}ˆ˜}°/…iÞ>ÀiœœŽˆ˜}vœÀÌÀ>Ûiœ«Ìˆœ˜ÃœÕÌÈ`iœv ̅iÌÀ>`ˆÌˆœ˜>Vœ““ÕÌi° œÜˆÃ̅iœ««œÀÌ՘ˆÌÞ̜“>Ži̅i«œˆVÞ`iVˆÃˆœ˜Ã˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞ̜ ˜Õ`}iVÕÃ̜“iÀÃ>Ü>ÞvÀœ“̅iˆÀÛi…ˆVið/À>˜ÃˆÌ“ÕÃÌ]“œÀi̅>˜iÛiÀ]LiVœ“i>ÌÀՏÞ>‡`>Þ] >˜Þ܅iÀi‡Ìœ‡>˜Þ܅iÀiÃiÀۈVi]«>˜˜i`>˜``iÈ}˜i`>ÀœÕ˜`̅i˜ii`Ãœv̅iVÕÃ̜“iÀ°˜œÌ…iÀ ܜÀ`Ã]̅i"˜iÌܜÀŽ“ÕÃÌLiVœ“iÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆˆ˜ÃÌi>`œvVœ““ÕÌiÀÀ>ˆ­ÃiiV…>ÀÌœ˜«>}iÈ®° Introduction 4- 85 - Allandale Waterfront Newmarket Aurora Highway 7 Downsview Park Eglinton Caledonia Spadina Union Cherry Gerrard-Don Richmond Hill Lincolnville Mount Joy Pearson Niagara Milton Mount Pleasant WoodbineKitchener Central ExhibitionPort CreditOakville East Harbour Scarborough HamiltonCentral Pickering Trillium Base Service 10 11 12 10 11 121011 121011 12 10 11 T4 T5 T7 T1 Route ;v1ubrঞomķ_;-7‰-‹Őr;-hņo@r;-hő Hamilton to Oshawa, express, 10/10 Niagara to Oshawa, express, 30/30 Oakville to Pickering, local, 10/10 Kitchener to Cherry, express, 20/20 Mount Pleasant to Cherry, express, 20/20 Pearson to Gerrard-Don, local, 5/10Some peak-hour service to/from Richmond Hill Allendale Waterfront to Cherry, express, 20/20 Newmarket Main Street to Cherry, local, 10/10 Milton to Lincolnville, local, 5/10Some trains to/from Mount Joy, all times Bloor This map shows the TRBOT’s proposal for Trillium service. All express and terminal stops are labeled, with local stops shown as smaller dots. T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T4 T4 T5 T6 T6 T4 T5 T6 T9 T9 T4 T5 T6 T4 T5 T6 T4 T5 T6 T6 T6 T7 T8 T7 T8 T7 T8 T7 T8 T7 T8 T7 T8 T7 T8 T7 T8T9T9T9 T9 T9 T9 T9 T1 T2 T3 T9 T1 T2 T3 T2 T310T1 T2 T310T1T2 T310T1 T2 T310T1 T2 T310T1T2 T310T1T2 T310T1 T2 10T1 Oshawa T210T1 Bloor-Landsdowne T7 T8 REGIONAL RAIL FOR THE TORONTO REGION Proposed Trillium Rail Network /…ˆÃÀi«œÀÌLՈ`Ãœ˜«Àœ«œÃ>ÃvÀœ“̅i œ>À`½Ã«ÀiۈœÕÃÀi«œÀ̈˜̅ˆÃ ÃiÀˆiÃ(Erasing the Invisible Line – Integrating the Toronto Region’s Transit Networks)>˜`“>ŽiÃ̅iV>ÃivœÀ̅i`iÛiœ«“i˜Ìœv>Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ ˜iÌܜÀŽ>VÀœÃÃ̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜° ÞiÝ>“ˆ˜ˆ˜}LiÃÌ«À>V̈ViÃ>Ài>`Þ ˆ˜ÕÃi>ÀœÕ˜`̅iܜÀ`]ˆÌiÝ«>ˆ˜Ã}Ո`ˆ˜}«Àˆ˜Vˆ«iÃvœÀ̅iÃÕVViÃÃvՏ ˆ“«i“i˜Ì>̈œ˜œvÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ]>˜`œÕ̏ˆ˜iÃ>«Àœ«œÃi`Trillium Regional Rail Network vœÀ̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜° This map shows the Toronto Region Board of Trade’s proposal for Trillium service. All express and terminal stops are labeled, with local stops shown as smaller dots. CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 5- 86 - œVÕÃiÃœ˜Àiˆiۈ˜}ÀÕÅ…œÕÀ…ˆ}…Ü>Þ Vœ˜}iÃ̈œ˜LÞi˜VœÕÀ>}ˆ˜}`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜‡LœÕ˜` Vœ““ÕÌiÀÃ̜«>ÀŽ>ÌÃÕLÕÀL>˜À>ˆÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã >˜`Àˆ`i̅iÌÀ>ˆ˜ˆ˜Ìœ̅iVˆÌÞ° 1Ãi؈˜iÌii˜Ì…‡Vi˜ÌÕÀÞÀ>ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀà Å>Ài`ˆ˜“>˜ÞV>ÃiÃ܈̅ˆ˜ÌiÀVˆÌÞ>˜` vÀiˆ}…ÌÀ>ˆÃiÀۈVið -V…i`ՏiÃ…i>ۈÞÜiˆ}…Ìi`̜՘ˆ`ˆÀiV̈œ˜> ÀÕÅ…œÕÀÃiÀۈVi]܈̅“Տ̈«iÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã «iÀ…œÕÀ>ÌÀÕÅ…œÕÀ]>˜`iÛiÀÞÎä̜Èä “ˆ˜ÕÌiíœÀ˜œÌ>Ì>®œÕÌÈ`iÀÕÅ…œÕÀ° >À}iÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã`iÈ}˜i`vœÀ«>ÃÃi˜}iÀà ̜ÈÌ`œÜ˜>˜`Àˆ`ivœÀœ˜}`ˆÃÌ>˜Við -iÀۈViœ«iÀ>̈˜}>À}iÞˆ˜`i«i˜`i˜ÌÞ œvœV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ]܈̅ܓiœV>LÕÃvii`iÀ ÃiÀۈVið ƂÕ̜‡œÀˆi˜Ìi`ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã܈̅>À}i«>ÀŽ‡>˜`‡ Àˆ`iœÌ𠈘iÃÀ>`ˆ>̈˜}œÕÌvÀœ“̅i`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜VœÀi] ܈̅ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ãi“«Ìވ˜}>Ì`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜ÃÌ>̈œ˜>˜` ̅i˜}œˆ˜}œÕÌœvÃiÀۈViœÀÌÕÀ˜ˆ˜}>ÀœÕ˜`>Ì ̅i“>ˆ˜`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜ÃÌ>̈œ˜° >ëÀi“ˆÕ“v>Àið -iÀÛiÃ>Ã>…ˆ}…‡Ã«ii`]…ˆ}…‡V>«>VˆÌÞL>VŽLœ˜i ̜̅iœV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÃÞÃÌi“]“ÕV…ˆŽi>ÃÕLÜ>Þ° œÃÌÀˆ`iÀÃÜ>ŽœÀÕÃi̅iLÕÃ̜Ài>V…ÃÌ>̈œ˜ÃÆ …i>ۈÞÕÃi`vœÀœV>ÌÀˆ«Ã܈̅`iÃ̈˜>̈œ˜Ã܈`iÞ `ˆÃ«iÀÃi`>VÀœÃÃ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜° 1Ãi؈˜iÌii˜Ì…‡Vi˜ÌÕÀÞÀ>ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃVœ˜˜iVÌi` ܈̅“œÀiÀiVi˜ÌÃi}“i˜ÌÃ]Å>Ài`ˆ˜“>˜ÞV>Ãià ܈̅ˆ˜ÌiÀVˆÌÞ>˜`vÀiˆ}…ÌÀ>ˆÃiÀۈVi𠜘ÈÃÌi˜Ì]vÀiµÕi˜Ì­}i˜iÀ>ÞiÛiÀÞ£x“ˆ˜ÕÌià œÀLiÌÌiÀ®ÃiÀۈVi>`>Þ]iÛiÀÞ`>Þ° /À>ˆ˜Ã`iÈ}˜i`vœÀÀ>«ˆ`œ>`ˆ˜}>˜`՘œ>`ˆ˜}]܈̅ “>˜Þ`œœÀÃ>˜`Àœœ“vœÀLœÌ…Ãi>Ìi`œ˜}iÀ‡`ˆÃÌ>˜Vi Àˆ`iÀÃ>˜`ÃÌ>˜`ˆ˜}«>ÃÃi˜}iÀÓ>Žˆ˜}ŜÀÌÌÀˆ«Ã° -iÀۈViVœÃiÞˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`܈̅œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ] ܈̅ˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`v>ÀiÃ>˜`VœœÀ`ˆ˜>Ìi`ÃV…i`Տià `iÈ}˜i`vœÀ“Տ̈“œ`>ÌÀˆ«Ã° -Ì>̈œ˜ÃÈÌi`˜i>À“>œÀ>ÀÌiÀˆ>Àœ>`Ã̜ˆ“«ÀœÛi œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌVœ˜˜iV̈œ˜Ã]ÃÕÀÀœÕ˜`i`LÞ…ˆ}…‡`i˜ÃˆÌÞ `iÛiœ«“i˜Ì]>˜`VœÃiÞë>Vi`vœÀ«i`iÃÌÀˆ>˜ >VViÃȘ̅iVœÀi° ˆ˜iÃÀ՘˜ˆ˜}̅ÀœÕ}…̅i`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜VœÀi]܈̅ “Տ̈«i`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã>˜`ÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃÌÕÀ˜ˆ˜}>Ì ˜œ˜‡`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã° >ÀiÃ>ÀivՏÞˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`܈̅œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ° Commuter Rail (GO Transit) Regional Rail (Berlin S-Bahn) 6- 87 - T œÀœ˜ÌœˆÃœ˜iœv œÀ̅Ƃ“iÀˆV>½Ã“œÃÌ `ޘ>“ˆVÕÀL>˜Ài}ˆœ˜Ã]܈̅Ìi˜Ãœv ̅œÕÃ>˜`ÃœvÀiÈ`i˜ÌÃ>˜`>܈`i>ÀÀ>Þ œvLÕȘiÃÃiÃV…œœÃˆ˜}̜œV>Ìi̅iÀi iÛiÀÞÞi>À°/…ˆÃ}ÀœÜ̅]܅ˆiÜiVœ“i]«>ViÃ>˜ ˆ˜VÀi>Ș}LÕÀ`i˜œ˜̅iÀi}ˆœ˜½ÃÌÀ>˜Ã«œÀÌ>̈œ˜ ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi]܈̅iÛiÀ‡œ˜}iÀVœ““ÕÌiÃ>˜`ÃiÛiÀi Vœ˜}iÃ̈œ˜°/…iˆÃÃÕiˆÃÌܜvœ`°7…ˆiÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌˆÃÜi ÕÃi`܈̅ˆ˜̅i ˆÌÞœv/œÀœ˜Ìœ]“>˜ÞÀˆ`iÀÃÃÕvviÀ ϜÜÌÀˆ«Ãˆ˜ÛœÛˆ˜}œ˜}LÕÍœÕÀ˜iÞÃ̜`ˆÃÌ>˜Ì ÃÕLÜ>ÞÌÀ>˜ÃviÀÃ]œÀ>˜œÌ…iÀLÕð˜̅iVœ““Õ˜ˆÌˆià ÃÕÀÀœÕ˜`ˆ˜}̅i ˆÌÞœv/œÀœ˜Ìœ]“>˜ÞÀiÈ`i˜Ìà >Ài>LÕÌvœÀVi`̜`ÀˆÛi̜}iÌ̜>˜`vÀœ“ܜÀŽ >˜`œÌ…iÀ`iÃ̈˜>̈œ˜Ã°>˜ÞˆÛiv>ÀvÀœ“À>«ˆ` ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã]“i>˜ˆ˜}œ˜}LÕÍœÕÀ˜iÞÈv̅iÞ Ü>˜Ì̜ÕÃiÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ̜}œœ˜}`ˆÃÌ>˜Við"/À>˜ÃˆÌ «ÀœÛˆ`iÃiÝVii˜ÌÃiÀۈVivœÀÀÕÅ…œÕÀVœ““ÕÌiÀà ̜`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜/œÀœ˜Ìœ]LṎ̈Ãv>À“œÀiˆ“ˆÌi`vœÀ œÌ…iÀÌÀˆ«Ã° œÌ>LÞ]™Ó¯œv«>ÃÃi˜}iÀÃÌÀ>Ûi̜>˜` vÀœ“/œÀœ˜Ìœ*i>Àܘ˜ÌiÀ˜>̈œ˜>ƂˆÀ«œÀÌLÞV>À]>à `œ>ȓˆ>À«iÀVi˜Ì>}iœv̅iÎää]äää«iœ«i܅œ ܜÀŽ܈̅ˆ˜̅i>ˆÀ«œÀÌi“«œÞ“i˜Ì✘i­Ƃ <®p ̅iÃiVœ˜`‡>À}iÃÌVœ˜Vi˜ÌÀ>̈œ˜œvi“«œÞ“i˜Ì ˆ˜ >˜>`>°/…ˆÃˆÃ}i˜iÀ>̈˜}œ˜i“ˆˆœ˜`>ˆÞ V>ÀÌÀˆ«Ã]“œÀi̅>˜̅i˜Õ“LiÀœvÌÀˆ«Ã“>`i̜ `œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜/œÀœ˜Ìœ°£7…ˆi"½ÃˆÌV…i˜iÀVœÀÀˆ`œÀ «>ÃÃiÃ̅ÀœÕ}…̅i>Ài>]ˆ“ˆÌi`ÃiÀۈVi“i>˜ÃˆÌˆÃœv ˆ“ˆÌi`ṎˆÌÞvœÀVœ““ÕÌiÀÃ̜ˆÌÃÌi˜Ãœv̅œÕÃ>˜`à œvœLð/…iÀiÃՏ̈˜}܈`iëÀi>`V>ÀÕÃi>Ì*i>Àܘ >˜`>ÌVœÕ˜ÌiÃÜ̅iÀÀi}ˆœ˜>>V̈ۈÌÞVi˜ÌÀiÃ…i«Ã “>ŽiÌÀ>˜Ã«œÀÌ>̈œ˜>“>œÀVœ˜ÌÀˆLÕ̜À̜˜œÝˆœÕà >ˆÀ«œṎœ˜>˜`}Àii˜…œÕÃi}>Ãi“ˆÃȜ˜Ãˆ˜̅i Ài}ˆœ˜p>VÀˆÌˆV>i˜ÛˆÀœ˜“i˜Ì>>˜`«ÕLˆV…i>Ì… Vœ˜ViÀ˜° œLˆˆÌÞˆÃ>LœÕÌ“œÀi̅>˜ÀÕÅ…œÕÀ>˜`>™‡x Vœ““ÕÌiˆ˜Ìœ/œÀœ˜Ìœ½ÃVi˜ÌÀ>LÕȘiÃÃ`ˆÃÌÀˆVÌ° *œ«Õ>̈œ˜>˜`i“«œÞ“i˜Ì]LœÌ…«Ài‡>˜`«œÃ̇ VœÛˆ`]…>ÛiLii˜ÌÀi˜`ˆ˜}̜Ü>À`Ã}ÀœÜ̅ˆ˜ “iÌÀœ«œˆÌ>˜>Ài>ðÀœ“Ó䣙‡ÓäÓä]}ÀœÜ̅ˆ˜ ˆÌV…i˜iÀ‡ >“LÀˆ`}i‡7>ÌiÀœœ] À>“«Ìœ˜] >ÀÀˆi] iiۈi]>˜`Õi«…]>œÕÌ«>Vi`/œÀœ˜Ìœ]܈̅ >“ˆÌœ˜˜œÌv>ÀLi…ˆ˜`° iëˆÌiÃ̈Ŝ܈˜} œÛiÀ>«œÃˆÌˆÛi«œ«Õ>̈œ˜}ÀœÜ̅]«Àˆ“>ÀˆÞ`Õi̜ ˆ˜ÌiÀ˜>̈œ˜>“ˆ}À>̈œ˜]̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ ƂVœ˜Ìˆ˜Õi` ̜Ãii“œÀi«iœ«i“œÛˆ˜}̜œÌ…iÀÀi}ˆœ˜Ãœv "˜Ì>Àˆœ̅>˜“œÛˆ˜}ˆ˜pi>`ˆ˜}̜>ÀiVœÀ`œÃÃœv «iœ«i>Ã>ÀiÃՏÌœv̅iÃi«œ«Õ>̈œ˜“œÛi“i˜Ìð /…ˆÃivviVÌÜ>ÓœÃÌ«Àœ˜œÕ˜Vi`vœÀ̅i ˆÌÞœv /œÀœ˜Ìœ]̅i>À}iÃÌ“Õ˜ˆVˆ«>ˆÌÞˆ˜̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ Ƃ°/…i ˆÌÞœv/œÀœ˜Ìœ½Ã«œ«Õ>̈œ˜}ÀœÜ̅vÀœ“ Ó䣙̜ÓäÓäÜ>óä°n¯]Vœ“«>Ài`̜³Î°{¯ˆ˜ ˜iˆ}…LœÕÀˆ˜} À>“«Ìœ˜>˜`³{°£¯ˆ˜ˆÌœ˜°"ÛiÀ ̅i>ÃÌÞi>À]/œÀœ˜Ìœ…>ÃÃii˜œÛiÀxä]äää«iœ«i i>Ûi̅iVˆÌÞ̜̅iœÕ̏ވ˜}ÃÕLÕÀLÃ]>˜`>Ài>à The Case for Regional Rail CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 7- 88 - >LÜÀLˆ˜}̅ˆÃ}ÀœÜ̅ˆ˜VÕ`i"Å>Ü>]>ÌÓ°£¯ }ÀœÜ̅]>˜`̅iˆÌV…i˜iÀ‡ >“LÀˆ`}i‡7>ÌiÀœœ>Ài>] ܅ˆV…Ã>ÜÓ¯}ÀœÜ̅° /…i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜>Ã>܅œi܈Vœ˜Ìˆ˜Õi̜ ÃiiVœ˜Ãˆ`iÀ>LiœÛiÀ>}ÀœÜ̅ˆ˜̅iVœ“ˆ˜} Þi>ÀÃ̅>˜ŽÃ̜ˆ““ˆ}À>̈œ˜]LÕÌ̅>Ì}ÀœÜ̅܈ Vœ˜Ìˆ˜Õi̜Li`ˆÃ«Àœ«œÀ̈œ˜>ÌiÞœV>Ìi`ˆ˜̅i œÕÌiÀ«>ÀÌœv̅iÀi}ˆœ˜p˜iViÃÈÌ>̈˜}Ài}ˆœ˜> ÌÀ>˜Ã«œÀÌ>̈œ˜܏Ṏœ˜Ã° /œ>``̜̅iÌÀi˜`ˆ˜}ÀœÜ̅œÕÌÈ`iœv /œÀœ˜Ìœ]i“«œÞ“i˜ÌÌÀi˜`Ã>Ài>Ãœňv̈˜}° œÀi̅>˜{ˆ˜£ä«ÕLˆVÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÕÃiÀí{Ó¯®>Ài VÕÀÀi˜ÌÞÌiiܜÀŽˆ˜}°œÃÌœÀ}>˜ˆâ>̈œ˜ÃvœÀiÃii >vÕÌÕÀi…ÞLÀˆ`œvÀi“œÌiܜÀŽ>˜`“>ˆ˜Ì>ˆ˜ˆ˜} >«…ÞÈV>vœœÌ«Àˆ˜ÌÆ“>˜Þ>ÀiiÝ«œÀˆ˜}…ˆ}…iÀ i“«œÞii̜`iÎÀ>̈œÃ]>˜`ܓi>ÀiVœ˜Ãˆ`iÀˆ˜} `iVi˜ÌÀ>ˆâˆ˜}`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜œvwViÃ>˜`VÀi>̈˜} Ã>ÌiˆÌiœÀVœ‡ÜœÀŽˆ˜}ë>Við 7ˆ̅iܜÀŽ‡vÀœ“‡…œ“iÌÀi˜`LiÃÕÃÌ>ˆ˜i`vœÀ /œÀœ˜Ìœ½Ã`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜VœÀi¶Ƃ“œÃÌÇ䯜vœLà `œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜V>˜Ài>ܘ>LÞLi«iÀvœÀ“i`Ài“œÌiÞ° /…>ÌiµÕ>ÌiÃ̜œÛiÀ{ää]äääœvxn{]Èx™̜Ì> `œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜œLÃ̅>ÌV>˜Li«iÀvœÀ“i`Ài“œÌiÞ ­-ÌÀ>Ìi}ˆV,i}ˆœ˜>,iÃi>ÀV…Ƃˆ>˜Vi] iVi“LiÀ ÓäÓä®° /…iÃiÌÀi˜`뜈˜Ì̜>˜ii`̜i˜ÃÕÀi̅>Ì ̅ivœVÕÃœv̅iÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ˜iÌܜÀŽLi˜œÌœ˜Þœ˜ ˆ“«ÀœÛˆ˜}>VViÃÃ̜̅iVˆÌÞVi˜ÌÀi]LÕÌ>Ãœœ˜ ÃÕ««œÀ̈˜}“œÛi“i˜Ì̜>˜`vÀœ“̅iœÕÌiÀÀˆ˜}̜ i˜ÃÕÀi̅>ÌÜi>ÀiÃÕ««œÀ̈˜}̅iÀi}ˆœ˜½ÃœÛiÀ> iVœ˜œ“ˆVÃÕVViÃÃ>˜`ÀiVœÛiÀÞ° i>˜Ü…ˆi]i“«œÞ“i˜Ì}ÀœÜ̅ˆÃÃÌÀœ˜}iÀ ̅>˜iÛiÀˆ˜“>˜ÞiÃÃi˜Ìˆ>ܜÀŽiÀÀœiÃ]ÃÕV…>à …i>Ì…V>Ài>˜`œ}ˆÃ̈Vð iœˆÌÌi½Ã>˜Õ>ÀÞÓäÓ£ iVœ˜œ“ˆVvœÀiV>Ã̈˜`ˆV>Ìi`̅>Ì…i>Ì…V>Ài>˜` ÜVˆ>>ÃÈÃÌ>˜ViŜՏ`ÃiiÃÌÀœ˜}}ÀœÜ̅>Ã̅i ÃiV̜ÀVœ˜Ìˆ˜ÕiÃ̜L>Ì̏i̅iœ˜}œˆ˜}ivviVÌÃœv ̅i«>˜`i“ˆV܅ˆiLi}ˆ˜˜ˆ˜}̅iÛ>VVˆ˜iÀœœÕÌ >˜`]V>ÌV…ˆ˜}Õ«œ˜>˜՘«ÀiVi`i˜Ìi``i>Þˆ˜ ˜œ˜‡VÀˆÌˆV>«ÀœVi`ÕÀiÃ̅>ÌÜiÀi«œÃÌ«œ˜i``ÕÀˆ˜} ̅i…iˆ}…Ìœv̅i«>˜`i“ˆV° >˜Þœv̅iÃiÀœiÃ…>Ûi˜œ˜‡ÌÀ>`ˆÌˆœ˜>ܜÀŽ …œÕÀÃœÀ]ˆ˜̅iV>Ãiœvœ}ˆÃ̈VÃ]…>ÛiܜÀŽœV>̈œ˜Ã vœVÕÃi`œÕÌÈ`iœv̅i`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜VœÀi­ÃÕV…>Ș i“«œÞ“i˜Ì✘iØi>À*i>ÀܘƂˆÀ«œÀÌ®° ˜>``ˆÌˆœ˜]œ˜iœv̅i՘`iÀÞˆ˜}`ÀˆÛiÀÃœv «Àœ`ÕV̈ۈÌÞ}ÀœÜ̅ˆ˜̅iiVœ˜œ“ÞVœ˜Ìˆ˜ÕiÃ̜ Li̅i`i˜ÃˆÌÞ­œÀ«ÀœÝˆ“ˆÌÞ®œviVœ˜œ“ˆV>V̈ۈÌÞp iÛi˜«œÃ̇ "6 ° œ˜Ìˆ˜Õi`ˆ“«ÀœÛi“i˜ÌȘ Vœ““ÕÌiÀÀ>ˆÃiÀۈViܜՏ`Vœ˜Ìˆ˜Õi̜ÃÕ««œÀÌ ̅ˆÃiVœ˜œ“ˆV`ÀˆÛiÀœv̅i}ÀœÜ̅ˆ˜ˆÛˆ˜} ÃÌ>˜`>À`Ã]iëiVˆ>Þ>Ì>̈“i܅i˜«Àœ`ÕV̈ۈÌÞ }ÀœÜ̅ˆÃ>Ì>˜>‡Ìˆ“i«œÃ̇Ü>ÀœÜ]>˜`܅i˜ ̅i>VViiÀ>̈œ˜œv̅iÀi“œÌi‡ÜœÀŽÌÀi˜`“>Þ ՘`iÀ“ˆ˜iiVœ˜œ“ˆV`i˜ÃˆÌÞ° /œ“iiÌ̅iÃiV…>i˜}iÃ]̅i“œÃÌivviV̈Ûi>˜` iVœ˜œ“ˆV>V…œˆViˆÃ̜LՈ`>Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ˜iÌܜÀŽ° "/À>˜ÃˆÌˆÃ>Ài>`Þ«>˜˜ˆ˜}>“>œÀiÝ«>˜Ãˆœ˜ «Àœ}À>“̅>̈˜Ìi˜`Ã̜`À>“>̈V>Þˆ˜VÀi>ÃiÃiÀۈVi LÞ«ÀœÛˆ`ˆ˜}Ìܜ‡Ü>Þ]>‡`>ÞÃiÀۈVi̅ÀœÕ}…œṎÌà ˜iÌܜÀŽ°Ì…>Ã>Ài>`ÞLi}՘̅i«ÀœViÃÃœvňv̈˜} vÀœ“>ÀÕÅ…œÕÀ]`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜‡vœVÕÃi`œ«iÀ>̈œ˜ ˆ˜Ìœ>˜>˜Þ܅iÀi‡Ìœ‡>˜Þ܅iÀi]>˜Þ̈“i>««Àœ>V…° -…ˆv̈˜}̜̅ˆÃ“œÀiyi݈LiÃiÀۈViˆÃ>ŽiÞii“i˜Ì œvÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ]>˜`̅ˆÃÀi«œÀÌLՈ`Ãœ˜̅>ÌۈÌ>Þ ˆ“«œÀÌ>˜ÌܜÀŽ̜…ˆ}…ˆ}…Ì“>˜ÞiµÕ>ÞVÀˆÌˆV> }œL>LiÃÌ«À>V̈ViÃ̅>Ì>ÀiiÃÃi˜Ìˆ>̜ˆ˜VÕ`ivœÀ >˜ivviV̈Ûiˆ“«i“i˜Ì>̈œ˜œvÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ° THE COST OF CONGESTION œ˜}iÃ̈œ˜…>ÃLii˜iÃ̈“>Ìi`̜VœÃÌ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜ fÈLˆˆœ˜iÛiÀÞȘ}iÞi>Àˆ˜œÃÌ«Àœ`ÕV̈ۈÌÞ° /…>Ìw}ÕÀiˆÃiÝ«iVÌi`̜}ÀœÜ̜f£xLˆˆœ˜LÞ ÓäΣ°Ó œ˜}iÃ̈œ˜ˆ“ˆÌÃ̅i>VViÃÃœvܜÀŽiÀà ̜œLÃ]>˜`Vœ˜ÌÀˆLÕÌiÃ̜̅iˆ˜>VViÃÈLˆˆÌÞœv >vvœÀ`>Li…œÕȘ}ˆ˜̅iÀi}ˆœ˜p>}ÀœÜˆ˜}VÀˆÃˆÃ ̅>Ì«>À̈VՏ>ÀÞ>vviVÌÃiÃÃi˜Ìˆ>ܜÀŽiÀðÎÌ>Ãœ `ˆÃÀÕ«ÌÃÃÕ««ÞV…>ˆ˜Ã>˜`«ÀiÛi˜ÌÃܜÀŽiÀÃvÀœ“ Àiˆ>LÞ“>Žˆ˜}>˜`ÀiViˆÛˆ˜}`iˆÛiÀˆiÃ]…>À“ˆ˜} ̅iVœ“«ï̈Ûi˜iÃÃœv/œÀœ˜ÌœÀi}ˆœ˜LÕȘiÃÃið "˜ÞÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌV>˜>``ÃÕvwVˆi˜ÌV>«>VˆÌÞ̜“iiÌ̅i 8- 89 - Ài}ˆœ˜½Ã}ÀœÜˆ˜}˜ii`ð"˜iÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆˆ˜iV>˜“œÛiwÛi ̈“iÃ>Ó>˜Þ«iœ«i>Ã>˜œÌ…iÀ>À`ˆ˜iÀ Ý«ÀiÃÃÜ>ÞpˆvˆÌ ÜiÀiiÛi˜«œÃÈLi̜LՈ`>˜œÌ…iÀiÝ«ÀiÃÃÜ>Þ°i>˜ˆ˜}vՏÞ >``ÀiÃȘ}̅iÀi}ˆœ˜>«ÀœLi“œvVœ˜}iÃ̈œ˜ÀiµÕˆÀiÃ> Ài}ˆœ˜>ÞÃV>i`܏Ṏœ˜° /…i“œÛi“i˜Ìœv}œœ`Ã]܅ˆV…ˆÃVÀˆÌˆV>̜̅iÀi}ˆœ˜½Ã iVœ˜œ“Þ]ˆÃLiˆ˜}ˆ˜VÀi>Ș}Þ…>“«iÀi`LÞÃiÛiÀiVœ˜}iÃ̈œ˜° /…i>Ài>>ÀœÕ˜`̅i>ˆÀ«œÀ̈à >˜>`>½Ã>À}iÃ̏œ}ˆÃ̈VÃ>˜` `ˆÃÌÀˆLṎœ˜Vi˜ÌÀi]>˜`ˆÌˆÃ…œ“i̜̅iÀi}ˆœ˜½Ã“>ˆ˜ˆ˜ÌiÀ“œ`> À>ˆ…ÕLðœÜiÛiÀ]ÌÀÕVŽÃw˜`ˆÌˆ˜VÀi>Ș}Þ`ˆvwVՏÌ̜}iÌ̜ ̅iˆÀ`iÃ̈˜>̈œ˜ÃLiV>ÕÃi̅i>Ài>½Ã…ˆ}…Ü>ÞÃ>Ài>Ì>VÀ>܏ vœÀ“ÕV…œv̅i`>Þ°,i}ˆœ˜>À>ˆV>˜}iÌ̅œÕÃ>˜`ÃœvV>ÀÃœvv ̅iˆ}…Ü>Þ{ä£]vÀiiˆ˜}Õ«ë>VivœÀ̅iÌÀÕVŽÃ̅>ÌŽii«œÕÀ iVœ˜œ“Þ“œÛˆ˜}>˜`…i«LÀˆ˜}œÕÀiÝ«œÀÌÃ̜“>ÀŽiÌ° REDUCING EMISSIONS ƂÕ̜“œLˆiÌÀ>˜Ã«œÀÌ>̈œ˜ˆÃÀi뜘ÈLivœÀ˜i>ÀÞ>̅ˆÀ`œv >}Àii˜…œÕÃi}>Ãi“ˆÃȜ˜Ãˆ˜̅i ˆÌÞœv/œÀœ˜Ìœ°{,i`ÕVˆ˜} ̅iÃii“ˆÃȜ˜Ã܈LiiÃÃi˜Ìˆ>ˆv/œÀœ˜ÌœˆÃ̜Ài>V…ˆÌÃ}œ> œv˜iÌâiÀœi“ˆÃȜ˜ÃLÞÓäxäœÀܜ˜iÀ°6i…ˆVՏ>Ài“ˆÃȜ˜Ã >Ài>ÃœÀi뜘ÈLivœÀ>ˆÀ«œṎœ˜̅>Ì…>Ã>ÃiÀˆœÕÈ“«>VÌ œ˜…i>Ì…p«>À̈VՏ>ÀÞvœÀ̅œÃi܈̅ÀiëˆÀ>̜ÀÞ…i>Ì… ÛՏ˜iÀ>LˆˆÌˆiðƂˆÀ«œṎœ˜vÀœ“Ûi…ˆViÈÃiÃ̈“>Ìi`̜Li Ài뜘ÈLivœÀ>LœÕÌÓnä`i>̅Ã>˜`£]ä™ä…œÃ«ˆÌ>ˆâ>̈œ˜Ã iÛiÀÞÞi>Àˆ˜̅i ˆÌÞœv/œÀœ˜Ìœ>œ˜i°x*Ó°x«>À̈VՏ>Ìi i“ˆÃȜ˜Ã]“>˜Þœv܅ˆV…Vœ“ivÀœ“Ûi…ˆViÃ]…>ÛiiÛi˜Lii˜ ˆ˜Ži`̜ "6 ‡£™“œÀLˆ`ˆÌÞ°,i}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ܈«ÀœÛˆ`i> }Àii˜iÀ>ÌiÀ˜>̈ÛivœÀÌÀ>Ûi̅>˜>Ș}iœVVÕ«>˜VÞÛi…ˆVi° 1,090 hospitalizations Air pollution from vehicles is estimated to be responsible for about 280 deaths every year in Toronto. One regional rail line can move ƂXGVKOGUCU many people as another Gardiner Expressway. CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 9- 90 - A REGION-WIDE RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK THAT LEVERAGES OUR INFRASTRUCTURE LEGACY /…i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜ˆÃ>Ài>`ÞLiÃÃi`܈̅>i}>VÞœvÀ>ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ̅>Ì À>`ˆ>Ìiˆ˜>`ˆÀiV̈œ˜ÃvÀœ“̅iÕÀL>˜VœÀi°7iœÛiÀ>Vi˜ÌÕÀÞœ`]̅iÞvœÀ“ ̅iL>VŽLœ˜iœv"/À>˜ÃˆÌ½Ã{x䇎“˜iÌܜÀŽ>˜`Vœ˜˜iVÌ̜>«œˆ˜ÌÃœv̅i Ài}ˆœ˜° Ո`ˆ˜}ÃÕV…>˜iÝ«>˜ÃˆÛi˜iÌܜÀŽvÀœ“ÃVÀ>ÌV…̜`>ÞܜՏ`Li> LṎ“«œÃÈLi]ÀiµÕˆÀˆ˜}>…>v‡`œâi˜Ì՘˜iÃ>VÀœÃÃ̅iVˆÌÞ°ƂÌ̅i"˜Ì>Àˆœ ˆ˜i½Ã«ÀœiVÌi`VœÃÌœv>LœÕÌfÇx䓈ˆœ˜«iÀŽˆœ“iÌÀi]ÀiVÀi>̈˜}"½Ã ˜iÌܜÀŽܜՏ`Li>fÎÎÇ°xLˆˆœ˜iÝ«i˜`ˆÌÕÀi° œÌiÛiÀÞVˆÌÞˆ˜̅iܜÀ`ˆÃi˜`œÜi`܈̅>˜iÌܜÀŽœvVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ>à Vœ“«iÌi>Ã/œÀœ˜Ìœ½Ã°˜“>˜Þ ÕÀœ«i>˜VˆÌˆiÃ]ˆŽi*>ÀˆÃ>˜`œ˜`œ˜] i˜œÀ“œÕÓi}>«ÀœiVÌÃÜiÀi˜ii`i`̜ˆ˜Ž`ˆÃVœ˜˜iVÌi`VœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ̅>Ìvi` `ˆvviÀi˜Ì`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜À>ˆÌiÀ“ˆ˜ˆ̜VÀi>Ìi>VÀœÃÇVˆÌÞ˜iÌܜÀŽ°˜/œÀœ˜Ìœ]̅>Ì ܜÀŽˆÃ>Ài>`Þ`œ˜i°ƂvÌiÀ`iV>`iÃ>˜`Lˆˆœ˜Ãœv`œ>ÀÃœvˆ˜ÛiÃ̓i˜Ì]*>ÀˆÃ ܈ܜ˜…>ÛiVÀi>Ìi`VÀœÃÇVˆÌÞVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ̜Ì>ˆ˜}iˆ}…ÌÌÀ>VŽÃ°"˜̅œÃiiˆ}…Ì ÌÀ>VŽÃ]̅i, ,“œÛiÓˆˆœ˜ÃœvÀˆ`iÀëiÀ`>Þp“œÀi̅>˜Ìi˜̈“iÃ>Ó>˜Þ >ÃÕÃi̅i"˜iÌܜÀŽ° /…i/œÀœ˜ÌœÀi}ˆœ˜]܈̅Ìi˜VÀœÃÇ`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜ÌÀ>VŽÃ]ˆÃ>Ài>`Þ>…i>`œv*>ÀˆÃ° 7ˆÌ…œÕ̘ii`ˆ˜}̜LՈ`>Ș}iÃÕLÜ>ÞÌ՘˜iœÀiiÛ>Ìi`ˆ˜i]/œÀœ˜Ìœ½Ã À>ˆ˜iÌܜÀŽpÕȘ}}œL>LiÃÌ«À>V̈ViÃÌ>˜`>À`Ãœvœ«iÀ>̈œ˜pVœÕ`“œÛi >Ó>˜Þ«iœ«i>ÃVœÕ`Vœ˜ViˆÛ>LÞLi˜ii`i`ˆ˜̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜°Ƃ Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÃÞÃÌi“L>Ãi`œ˜}œL>LiÃÌ«À>V̈Viœ«iÀ>̈œ˜ÃVœÕ`“œÛiœÛiÀ Îää]äää«iœ«i«iÀ…œÕÀˆ˜Ìœ̅iVœÀi*pVœ“«>Ài`܈̅Îä]äää«iÀ…œÕÀœ˜ ̅i9œ˜}iÃÕLÜ>Þp>܈̅œÕ̘ii`ˆ˜}̜LՈ`iÝ«i˜ÃˆÛiÌ՘˜iÃœÀœÌ…iÀ “>œÀˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi°/…iÀ>ˆ˜iÌܜÀŽˆÃ̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜½Ã}Ài>ÌiÃÌ՘`iÀÕÃi` ÀiÜÕÀVipœ˜i̅>̘ii`Ã̜LiÌ>««i`ˆv̅ˆÃ܈Vœ˜Ìˆ˜Õi̜Li̅iv>ÃÌiÃ̇ }ÀœÜˆ˜}ÕÀL>˜Ài}ˆœ˜ˆ˜ œÀ̅Ƃ“iÀˆV>° PLANNING IMPROVED RAIL IN THE TORONTO REGION *>˜ÃvœÀÌܜ‡Ü>Þ]>‡`>ÞÃiÀۈViœ˜̅i"˜iÌܜÀŽÜiÀiˆ˜VÕ`i`ˆ˜/…i ˆ} œÛi]>Óään«>˜­Õ«`>Ìi`ÃiÛiÀ>̈“iî̅>̏>ˆ`œÕÌiÌÀœˆ˜Ý½Ãœ˜}‡ÌiÀ“ «>˜Ã°È-ÕLÃiµÕi˜ÌÃÌÕ`ˆiÃ…>Ûi>ÃœLՈÌœ˜̅iVœ˜Vi«Ì]ÃÕV…>Ã̅i i«ÌˆÃ œÕ˜`>̈œ˜½ÃÓä£ÎÀiۈiÜœviÌÀœˆ˜Ý½Ã«>˜Ã°ÇƂœv̅i“V>i`vœÀÌ>Žˆ˜} >`Û>˜Ì>}iœv̅iˆ“«ÀiÃÈÛiÀ>`ˆ>À>ˆ˜iÌܜÀŽˆ˜̅i/œÀœ˜ÌœÀi}ˆœ˜̜iÝ«>˜` vÀiµÕi˜ÌÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÃiÀۈVi°iÌÀœˆ˜Ý>˜`˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi"˜Ì>Àˆœ>ÀiVÕÀÀi˜ÌÞ A regional rail system based on global best practice operations could move over 300,000 people per hour into the core —compared with 30,000 per hour on the Yonge subway. I >Ãi`œ˜>ÃiÀۈVi«>ÌÌiÀ˜œv£ÓÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã«iÀ…œÕÀœ˜ˆÌV…i˜iÀ]>ŽiŜÀi]-̜Õvvۈi]>˜`ˆÌœ˜ VœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ>˜`ÈÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã«iÀ…œÕÀœ˜œÌ…iÀVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ]IÕȘ}*>ÀˆÃ, ,ä™Àœˆ˜}Ã̜VŽœv̅iÃ>“i i˜}̅>Ãi݈Ã̈˜}"ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã°ƂÌ£ÓÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã«iÀ…œÕÀ]̅iÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃܜՏ`…>Ûi>V>«>VˆÌÞœv˜i>ÀÞ {Ç]äää«>ÃÃi˜}iÀëiÀ…œÕÀ«iÀ`ˆÀiV̈œ˜°ƂÌ̅iˆ˜Ìi˜ÃˆÌÞœvœ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ã>˜`ÃÌ>̈œ˜`iÈ}˜ÌÞ«ˆV> œv ÕÀœ«i>˜œÀ>«>˜iÃiœ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ã]Տ̈“>ÌiV>«>VˆÌÞœ˜̅iÌi˜‡ÌÀ>VŽ`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜VœÀÀˆ`œÀܜՏ` ˆ˜VÀi>Ãi̜>ÓÕV…>Ãœ˜i“ˆˆœ˜«iœ«i]«iÀ…œÕÀ]«iÀ`ˆÀiV̈œ˜]Vœ“«>Ài`܈̅"/À>˜ÃˆÌ½Ã «Ài‡ "6 ̜Ì>À>ˆÀˆ`iÀň«œvÓ£x]äää«iÀ`>Þ° 10- 91 - ՘`iÀÌ>Žˆ˜}ÃiÛiÀ>«ÀœVÕÀi“i˜ÌÃ̜`iˆÛiÀ“>œÀ iÝ«>˜Ãˆœ˜œv"À>ˆÃiÀۈVi°"À}>˜ˆâ>̈œ˜Ãˆ˜œÌ…iÀ œÀ̅Ƃ“iÀˆV>˜VˆÌˆiÃ]ˆŽix̅-µÕ>Àiˆ˜*…ˆ>`i«…ˆ> >˜`/À>˜ÃˆÌ>ÌÌiÀȘ œÃ̜˜]…>Ûi>ÃœLii˜ >`ۜV>̈˜}vœÀÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆˆ˜̅iˆÀVœ““Õ˜ˆÌˆið /…i ˆÌÞœv/œÀœ˜Ìœ½Ã-“>ÀÌ/À>VŽ«>˜LՈ`Ãœ˜ ̅iÃiivvœÀÌÃ܈̅ˆÌÃ>ˆ“œvvՏÞˆ˜Ìi}À>̈˜}«>ÀÌœv̅i -̜Õvvۈi]>ŽiŜÀi]>˜`ˆÌV…i˜iÀVœÀÀˆ`œÀȘ̜̅i œV>// ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ܈̅vÀiµÕi˜Ì]À>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÃiÀۈVi°/…ˆÃ “i>˜Ã̅>ÌÀˆ`iÀÃܜՏ`«>Þ̅iÃ>“iv>Ài>Ã̅i// ] ˆ˜VÕ`ˆ˜}vÀiiÌÀ>˜ÃviÀÃvÀœ“LÕÃ]ÃÕLÜ>Þ]>˜`ÃÌÀiiÌV>Àà ̜̅i˜iÜ-“>ÀÌ/À>VŽÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã°Ì>Ãœ“i>˜ÃÀi`iÈ}˜ˆ˜} LÕÃÀœÕÌiÃ܅iÀi˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞ̜LÀˆ˜}«>ÃÃi˜}iÀÃ̜̅i ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã]>ÈÃ̅iV>Ãiœ˜̅iÃÕLÜ>Þ]>˜`ˆÌ“i>˜Ã >``ˆÌˆœ˜>ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã̜v>VˆˆÌ>Ìi̅œÃiVœ˜˜iV̈œ˜Ã>˜`̜ ÃiÀÛiŽiÞÕÀL>˜˜œ`ið-“>ÀÌ/À>VŽˆÃ>˜ˆ“«œÀÌ>˜ÌÃÌi« ̜Ü>À`Ài>ˆâˆ˜}Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ]>˜`̅ˆÃÀi«œÀ̈ȘÌi˜`i` ̜LՈ`œ˜̅iVˆÌÞ½Ã>˜`«ÀœÛˆ˜Vi½Ã«>˜Ã]…ˆ}…ˆ}…̈˜} }œL>Þ«ÀœÛi˜«À>V̈ViÃ̜>ˆ`ˆ˜̅iˆÀˆ“«i“i˜Ì>̈œ˜° ÌV>ÃvœÀˆ“«i“i˜Ìˆ˜}>˜`}œˆ˜}Liޜ˜`Ìܜ‡Ü>Þ]>‡ `>Þ"ÃiÀۈVi̜ÌÀÕiiiVÌÀˆwi`Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ° /…ˆÃÀi«œÀÌ>ÃœLՈ`Ãœ˜̅i œ>À`½ÃV>vœÀ>vՏÞ ˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`Ài}ˆœ˜>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÃÞÃÌi“ˆ˜ˆÌÃÀiVi˜Ì«>ÞLœœŽ -…>«ˆ˜}"ÕÀÕÌÕÀi]܅ˆV…iÝ>“ˆ˜iÃ̅i˜ii`vœÀ ŽiÞˆ˜ÛiÃ̓i˜ÌÃ̜ÃÕ««œÀÌ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜½ÃiVœ˜œ“ˆV ÀiVœÛiÀÞ°n,i}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ>ÃœœvviÀÃ̅i«œÌi˜Ìˆ>̜ÌÀՏÞ Ž˜ˆÌ̜}i̅iÀ̅i˜˜œÛ>̈œ˜ œÀÀˆ`œÀˆ˜Ìœ>}œL>Þ Vœ“«ï̈ÛiÌiV…˜œœ}ÞÀi}ˆœ˜]i“Տ>̈˜}̅iivvœÀÌà VÕÀÀi˜ÌÞLiˆ˜}“>`i̜ÌÀ>˜ÃvœÀ“ >ÌÀ>ˆ˜ˆ˜-ˆˆVœ˜ 6>iÞˆ˜Ìœ>Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÃÞÃÌi“°™ /…i œ>À`…>ÃÃÌÀœ˜}ÞÃÕ««œÀÌi`̅iܜÀŽœv̅i œ˜˜iVÌ̅i œÀÀˆ`œÀœÀ}>˜ˆâ>̈œ˜]܅ˆV……>Ïœ˜}Lii˜ >`ۜV>̈˜}vœÀ̅iˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀiÕ«}À>`iØii`i` ̜i˜>LiÌܜ‡Ü>Þ]>‡`>ÞÃiÀۈViœ˜̅iˆÌV…i˜iÀ VœÀÀˆ`œÀ܈̅œṎ“«i`ˆ˜} vÀiˆ}…ÌÌÀ>vwV° ,i}ˆœ˜>À>ˆˆÃ«œ«Õ>À]̜œ°˜«œˆ˜}LÞ / ]nä¯ œv"˜Ì>ÀˆœÀiÈ`i˜ÌȘ`ˆV>Ìi`̅>Ì̅iÞÃÕ««œÀÌi`Ìܜ‡ Ü>Þ]>‡`>Þ"ÃiÀۈViˆ˜̅iˆÌV…i˜iÀVœÀÀˆ`œÀ]>˜`> “>œÀˆÌÞÃ>ˆ`̅>Ì̅iÞܜՏ`ÕÃiˆÌ°£ä /œÀœ˜ÌœÜ>Ã̅iœ˜ÞVˆÌÞˆ˜ œÀ̅Ƃ“iÀˆV>̜ˆ˜VÀi>Ãi ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÀˆ`iÀň«LiÌÜii˜£™{È>˜`£™Çä]ˆ˜>À}i «>ÀÌLiV>ÕÃiÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÜ>ëÀœÛˆ`i`>Ì̅iÃ>“ï“i ˜iÜ`iÛiœ«“i˜ÌÃÜiÀiLՈÌ°,i}ˆœ˜>À>ˆœvviÀÃ̅i «œÌi˜Ìˆ>̜Ài«i>Ì̅ˆÃÃÕVViÃð,i>ˆâˆ˜}̅i«Àœ“ˆÃi œvÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆi˜Ì>ˆÃiÝ«>˜`ˆ˜}̅iˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`>˜` vÀiµÕi˜ÌÃiÀۈVi“œ`i«Àœ«œÃi`ˆ˜-“>ÀÌ/À>VŽ«>˜Ã ̜̅ii˜ÌˆÀiÀi}ˆœ˜°1˜œVŽˆ˜}̅i˜iÌܜÀŽ½ÃV>«>VˆÌÞ VœÕ`ވi`“>ÃÈÛiLi˜iwÌÃ>ÌÀi>ܘ>LiVœÃÌ° /…iÀiˆÃ>˜œ««œÀÌ՘ˆÌÞvœÀ>Ài}ˆœ˜>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ «>À̘iÀÃ̜Vœ“i̜}i̅iÀ>˜`>}Àiiœ˜>Vœ““œ˜ vÀ>“iܜÀŽvœÀˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ°/…ii˜ÛˆÀœ˜“i˜Ì> >˜`Ài}ˆœ˜>iVœ˜œ“ˆVˆ“«iÀ>̈ÛiˆÃÃÌÀœ˜}]>˜`ˆÌˆÃ ̈“i̜ÀiۈÈÌ̅iܜÀŽ̅>ÌÜ>ÃÃÌ>ÀÌi`LÞ̅i ˆÌÞœv /œÀœ˜Ìœ>˜`iÌÀœˆ˜Ý° USING INFRASTRUCTURE MORE EFFICIENTLY /…i// œ«iÀ>ÌiÈÌÃÃÕLÜ>ÞÃ܈̅ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>ÀÀˆÛˆ˜} >˜``i«>À̈˜}LiÌÌiÀ̅>˜iÛiÀÞwÛi“ˆ˜ÕÌiÃ>`>Þ° 9iÌ̅iˆÌV…i˜iÀ>˜`-̜ÕvvۈiVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ]܅ˆV… …>Ûi“œÀi«œÌi˜Ìˆ>V>«>VˆÌÞ̅>˜>˜ÞÃÕLÜ>Þp `Õi̜œ˜}iÀÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã]>˜`ˆ˜̅iV>ÃiœvˆÌV…i˜iÀ] >}Ài>ÌiÀ˜Õ“LiÀœvÌÀ>VŽÃpÀ՘ˆ˜vÀiµÕi˜ÌÞ]܈̅ ÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃVœ“ˆ˜}œ˜Vi>˜…œÕÀœÀiÃÃœÕÌÈ`iÀÕÅ…œÕÀ° /…ˆÃˆÃ˜œÌLÞ“iÀˆÌœv̅iˆÀÃÕÀÀœÕ˜`ˆ˜}Ãp̅iÞ«>Ãà ̅ÀœÕ}…>Ài>Ãœvȓˆ>À`i˜ÃˆÌÞ̜̅iÃÕLÜ>Þ>˜` VÀœÃÓ>˜ÞLÕÃÞLÕÃ>˜`ÃÌÀiiÌV>ÀÀœÕÌið"˜>viÜ Ãi}“i˜ÌÃp“>ˆ˜Þ̅iˆÌœ˜VœÀÀˆ`œÀ]̅iˆÌV…i˜iÀ VœÀÀˆ`œÀLiÌÜii˜ À>“>i>>˜`iœÀ}i̜ܘ]>˜`̅i >ŽiŜÀi7iÃÌVœÀÀˆ`œÀˆ˜̅i ˆÌÞœv>“ˆÌœ˜p" Å>ÀiÃÌÀ>VŽÃ܈̅VÀˆÌˆV>Þˆ“«œÀÌ>˜ÌvÀiˆ}…ÌÌÀ>vwV ̅>Ì“ÕÃÌ>ÃœLi«ÀˆœÀˆÌˆâi`°/…iÀi“>ˆ˜ˆ˜}«œÀ̈œ˜Ã œv̅i˜iÌܜÀŽ]…œÜiÛiÀpˆ˜VÕ`ˆ˜}̅i>ŽiŜÀi VœÀÀˆ`œÀLiÌÜii˜ ÕÀˆ˜}̜˜>˜`"Å>Ü>]̅i ˆÌV…i˜iÀVœÀÀˆ`œÀvÀœ“1˜ˆœ˜̜ À>“>i>]>˜`̅i i˜ÌˆÀi-̜Õvvۈi>˜` >ÀÀˆiVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃp>Ài>Ài>`Þ œÜ˜i`LÞiÌÀœˆ˜Ý>˜`…>Ûiˆ“ˆÌi`vÀiˆ}…ÌÌÀ>vwV° ՘`>“i˜Ì>Þ]̅iˆ“ˆÌi`ÃiÀۈViœ˜̅iÃiˆ˜ià ˆÃ>V…œˆVi°/…iÃiÀœÕÌiÃ…>Ûi>ÓÕV…«œÌi˜Ìˆ> >Ã>˜ÞÃÕLÜ>Þ]LÕÌÃÕLÜ>އiÛi`i“>˜`܈œ˜Þ “>ÌiÀˆ>ˆâiˆv̅iˆÀÃiÀۈViiÛiÃ>˜`v>ÀiÃ>Ài“>`i Vœ“«>À>Li̜œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ° /…ˆÃ˜i}iVÌi`ˆ˜Ìi}À>̈œ˜>˜`ˆ“ˆÌi`ÃiÀۈVi >“œÕ˜ÌÃ̜>˜ˆ˜VÀi`ˆLÞˆ˜ivwVˆi˜ÌÕÃiœvLˆˆœ˜Ãœv `œ>ÀÃœvˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi°՘`Ài`ÃœvÌÀ>ˆ˜V>ÀÃ>˜` ˆ˜Û>Õ>LiÌÀ>VŽ>}iÈ̈`ivœÀ>LÕÌ>viÜ…œÕÀà œv̅i`>Þ]wÛi`>ÞëiÀÜiiŽ]܅ˆiV>ÀÀވ˜}œ>`à >À̈wVˆ>Þ`i«ÀiÃÃi`LÞv>Ài«œˆVÞ°/…iˆ“ˆÌi`“>ÀŽiÌ ̅>Ì̅ˆÃÃiÀۈVi>``ÀiÃÃiÃ>ÃœÀi`ÕViëœÌi˜Ìˆ> ÀiÛi˜Õi° œ““ÕÌiÀÀ>ˆ]܅ˆiœÃÌi˜ÃˆLÞ…ˆ}…Þ ivwVˆi˜ÌLÞvœVÕȘ}œ˜Þœ˜̅i…ˆ}…iÃ̇`i˜ÃˆÌÞ “>ÀŽiÌÃ]Vœ“iÃ>ÌÈ}˜ˆwV>˜ÌivwVˆi˜VÞ>˜`LÀœ>`iÀ iVœ˜œ“ˆVVœÃÌÃ܅i˜Vœ“«>Ài`̜Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ° CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 11- 92 - ,i}ˆœ˜>À>ˆV>˜ÃiÀÛi>Ã>VœÃ̇ivviV̈Ûi“i>˜Ã ̜iÝÌi˜`̅iÀi>V…œvÀ>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ̅ÀœÕ}…œÕÌ̅i /œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜°/œÀœ˜Ìœ˜ˆ>˜Ã…>Ûiœ˜}>“i˜Ìi` ̅iVœ“«>À>̈ÛiÞˆ“ˆÌi`iÝÌi˜Ìœv̅iˆÀVˆÌÞ½ÃÃÕLÜ>Þ ˜iÌܜÀŽVœ“«>Ài`̜“>˜Þœv/œÀœ˜Ìœ½Ã«iiÀVˆÌˆià >ÀœÕ˜`̅iܜÀ`° œ˜Ãˆ`iÀˆ˜}̅iVœÃÌœvÀiVi˜Ì ÃÕLÜ>ÞVœ˜ÃÌÀÕV̈œ˜«ÀœiVÌÃ]ˆÌܜՏ`˜iÛiÀLi«œÃÈLi ̜>vvœÀ`̅iVœ“«Ài…i˜ÃˆÛi˜iÌܜÀŽÃvœÕ˜`ˆ˜VˆÌˆià ˆŽi*>ÀˆÃ]œ˜`œ˜]>`Àˆ`]-…i˜â…i˜]-iœÕ]œÀ iˆˆ˜}] >œv܅ˆV……>Ûi…Õ˜`Ài`ÃœvŽˆœ“iÌÀiÃœvÀœÕÌià Vœ“«>Ài`̜/œÀœ˜Ìœ½Ã“œÀi“œ`iÃÌÇÈŽˆœ“iÌÀið 7ˆÌ…Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ]…œÜiÛiÀ]ˆÌܜՏ`Li«œÃÈLi̜ >``…Õ˜`Ài`ÃœvŽˆœ“iÌÀiÃ̜/œÀœ˜Ìœ½ÃÀ>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ ˜iÌܜÀŽp܈̅œÕ̘ii`ˆ˜}̜`ˆ}>Ș}iÌ՘˜i° The Lakeshore corridor between Burlington and Oshawa, the Kitchener corridor from Union to Bramalea, and the entire Stouffville and Barrie corridors, are already owned by Metrolinx. /…iVÕÀÀi˜ÌœÜ˜iÀň«œvÀ>ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀȘ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜°­-œÕÀVi\iÌÀœˆ˜Ý® 12- 93 - Trillium Base Network Potential Extensions TTC Subways Neighbourhood Improvemen LegendTrillium Base Network Potential Extensions TTC Subways Neighbourhood Improvement Areas Legend IMPROVING ACCESS TO OPPORTUNITY FOR EQUITY-SEEKING COMMUNITIES >˜Þœv̅i>Ài>Ã̅>ÌܜՏ`i˜œÞˆ“«ÀœÛi`ÃiÀۈVi̅ÀœÕ}… Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ>Ài…œ“i̜ÃÕLÃÌ>˜Ìˆ>iµÕˆÌއÃiiŽˆ˜}Vœ““Õ˜ˆÌˆið ,i}ˆœ˜>À>ˆVœÕ`LÀˆ˜}…ˆ}…‡Ã«ii`À>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ̜˜œÀ̅ÜiÃÌ ̜LˆVœŽi]˜œÀ̅-V>ÀLœÀœÕ}…]i>ÃÌ-V>ÀLœÀœÕ}…]7iÃ̜˜]̜˜>“i œ˜Þ>viÜ°œÀiÝ>“«i]ˆ˜ÃÌi>`œv˜ii`ˆ˜}̜Àˆ`i̅iLÕÃ> ̅iÜ>ÞvÀœ“>ÛiÀ˜̜̅iœÛiÀVÀœÜ`i`9œ˜}iÃÕLÜ>Þ̜}iÌ `œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜]-V>ÀLœÀœÕ}…ÀiÈ`i˜ÌÃVœÕ`Ì>Ži>ŜÀÌLÕÃÀˆ`i̜̅i -̜ÕvvۈiVœÀÀˆ`œÀ]܅ˆV…ܜՏ`Ã>Ûi̅i“>ÓÕV…>Ãn䓈˜ÕÌià œ˜>ÀœÕ˜`‡ÌÀˆ«`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜°ÌˆÃ˜½ÌÕÃÌ>LœÕÌ`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜]iˆÌ…iÀ° ÀiµÕi˜ÌLˆ`ˆÀiV̈œ˜>ÃiÀۈVi“>ŽiÈ̫œÃÈLi̜ÕÃiÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ vœÀ˜œ˜‡`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜ÌÀˆ«Ã°ƂÀiÈ`i˜Ìœv7iÃ̜˜VœÕ`}iÌ̜ܜÀŽ ˆ˜̅i>À}iˆ˜`ÕÃÌÀˆ>i“«œÞ“i˜ÌVi˜ÌÀiÃœv À>“«Ìœ˜ˆ˜՘`iÀ Ó䓈˜ÕÌiðƂÃ̅i œ>À`½ÃÀiVi˜ÌÀiÃi>ÀV…œ˜̅i«Àœ…ˆLˆÌˆÛiVœÃÌ œv…œÕȘ}vœÀiÃÃi˜Ìˆ>ܜÀŽiÀÃ…>Ã`i“œ˜ÃÌÀ>Ìi`]>Vœ““Õ˜ˆÌÞ ÃiÀۈViܜÀŽiÀi>À˜ˆ˜}>Ã>>ÀÞœvfxä]äääVœÕ`œ˜Þ>vvœÀ`̜Ài˜Ì >£‡Li`Àœœ“՘ˆÌˆ˜œ˜} À>˜V…]iiiÃ`>i‡ }ˆ˜Ìœ˜7iÃÌ]œÀ ,iÝ`>i‡ˆ«ˆ˜}p>>Ài>Ã̅>Ì>Ài`ˆvwVՏÌ̜>VViÃÃLÞi݈Ã̈˜} œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌLÕÌ̅>ÌܜՏ`Li`ˆÀiV̏ÞÃiÀÛi`LÞÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ°££ ÕÀÀi˜ÌÞ]̅iÃVœÀivœÀÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÃiÀۈVi>˜`>VViÃÈLˆˆÌÞˆ˜…ˆ}…‡ ˆ˜Vœ“i>Ài>Ãœv̅iVˆÌÞˆÃ>“œÃÌvœÕÀ̈“iÃ…ˆ}…iÀ̅>˜œÜ‡ˆ˜Vœ“i œ˜ið£Ó/…iÀ>`ˆV>Þˆ“«ÀœÛi`>VViÃÃ>vvœÀ`i`LÞÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ ܜՏ`Liˆvi‡V…>˜}ˆ˜}vœÀÀiÈ`i˜ÌÃœv̅iÀi}ˆœ˜܅œVÕÀÀi˜ÌÞ ÃÌÀÕ}}i̜}iÌ̜̅iˆÀœLÃ>˜`̜œÌ…iÀÃiÀۈVið Frequent bidirectional service makes it possible to use regional rail for non-downtown trips and to choose travel times that are less congested. /…iÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ˜iÌܜÀŽˆÃiëiVˆ>ÞivviV̈Ûi>̈“«ÀœÛˆ˜}ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ̜iµÕˆÌއÃiiŽˆ˜} Vœ““Õ˜ˆÌˆiÃ]ˆŽi̅i ˆÌÞœv/œÀœ˜Ìœ½Ã`iÈ}˜>Ìi` iˆ}…LœÕÀ…œœ`“«ÀœÛi“i˜ÌƂÀi>ð CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 13- 94 - CONNECTING BUSINESS DISTRICTS ACROSS THE REGION 7…ˆiVœ““ÕÌiÀÃiÀۈViVÕÀÀi˜ÌÞivviV̈ÛiÞÃiÀÛiÃVœ““ÕÌiÀÃ̜`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜ /œÀœ˜Ìœ]̅i>Ài>Ài«ÀiÃi˜ÌÃ>LœỌ̃ȯœv̅iÀi}ˆœ˜½Ã˜i>ÀÞΰx“ˆˆœ˜œLð /…i œ>À`½ÃÀi}ˆœ˜>ÀiVœÛiÀÞ«>ÞLœœŽ]Shaping Our Future]ˆ˜ÌÀœ`ÕVi` >LÕȘiÃÃ`ˆÃÌÀˆVÌÃvÀ>“iܜÀŽ̅>Ìë>̈>ÞœÀ}>˜ˆâiÃiVœ˜œ“ˆV>V̈ۈ̈ià ˆ˜̅iÀi}ˆœ˜ˆ˜ÌœwÛiÌÞ«iÃœvLÕȘiÃÃ`ˆÃÌÀˆVÌÃ̅>ÌV>«ÌÕÀi˜i>ÀÞÇx¯œv ̅iœLȘ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜]ˆ˜VÕ`ˆ˜}}œœ`ëÀœ`ÕV̈œ˜>˜``ˆÃÌÀˆLṎœ˜`ˆÃÌÀˆVÌÃ] >ÃÜi>ÃÀi}ˆœ˜>Vi˜ÌÀið/…iÃi`ˆÃÌÀˆVÌÃ>Ài`iw˜i`LÞȓˆ>ÀÌÞ«iÃœv iVœ˜œ“ˆV>V̈ۈÌÞ]ܜÀŽvœÀVi«ÀœwiÃ]>˜`ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi˜ii`ðƂÃ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜ ÀiVœÛiÀÃvÀœ“̅i«>˜`i“ˆV]ˆ“«ÀœÛˆ˜}Vœ˜˜iV̈ۈÌÞ̜ˆÌÃLÕȘiÃÃ`ˆÃÌÀˆVÌÈà VÀˆÌˆV>°,i}ˆœ˜>À>ˆˆÃ«>À̈VՏ>ÀÞivviV̈ÛivœÀÃiÀۈ˜}Vœ““ÕÌiÃ̜Ài}ˆœ˜> Vi˜ÌÀiÃ]܅ˆV…>Ài…œ“i̜Óän]ää䍜LÃ]ˆŽiˆÃÈÃÃ>Õ}> i˜ÌÀi>˜`̅i `œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜Ãœv À>“«Ìœ˜]>“ˆÌœ˜]">ŽÛˆi] ÕÀˆ˜}̜˜]"Å>Ü>]Õi«…] >˜`ˆÌV…i˜iÀp>œv܅ˆV…>Ài«ÀœÝˆ“>Ìi̜>Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÃÌ>̈œ˜°£Î KNITTING TOGETHER THE REGION’S LOCAL TRANSIT ,i}ˆœ˜>À>ˆˆÃ˜œÌÕÃÌ>LœÕÌÀi}ˆœ˜>ÌÀˆ«Ã°7ˆÌ…>``ˆÌˆœ˜>ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã] vÀiµÕi˜ÌÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã]>˜`Vœ˜˜iV̈œ˜Ã̜œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ]ˆÌV>˜v՘V̈œ˜>Ã>Žˆ˜` œvœV>ÃÕLÜ>Þ܈̅ˆ˜VˆÌˆiÃ>VÀœÃÃ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜° ÞŽ˜ˆÌ̈˜}̜}i̅iÀ̅i Ài}ˆœ˜½Ã«>ÌV…ÜœÀŽœvœV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÃÞÃÌi“Ã]Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆV>˜µÕˆVŽÞ>˜` V…i>«Þˆ“«ÀœÛi̅iˆÀivwVˆi˜VÞ>˜`ˆ˜VÀi>Ãi̅iˆÀÀˆ`iÀň«°˜ˆÃÈÃÃ>Õ}>] vœÀiÝ>“«i]̅i>ŽiŜÀi>˜`ˆÌœ˜ˆ˜iÃVœÕ`ܜÀŽˆŽii>Ã̇ÜiÃÌ ÃÕLÜ>ÞÃ]i˜>Lˆ˜}«iœ«i̜}iÌvÀœ“ œœŽÃۈi̜i>`œÜÛ>iˆ˜>“>ÌÌiÀ œv“ˆ˜ÕÌið,i}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÃÌ>̈œ˜ÃVœÕ`Livi`LޏœV>LÕÃÀœÕÌiÍÕÃÌ>à ̅iÃÕLÜ>ވȘ/œÀœ˜Ìœ°-ˆ“ˆ>ÀÞ]Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆœ˜̅iˆÌV…i˜iÀVœÀÀˆ`œÀ VœÕ`>œÜ À>“«Ìœ˜ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÀˆ`iÀÃ̜}iÌvÀœ“œÕ˜Ì*i>Ã>˜Ì̜ À>“>i> ÃÌ>̈œ˜ˆ˜œ˜Þ£x“ˆ˜ÕÌiÃ]À>̅iÀ̅>˜>˜…œÕÀœ˜̅iLÕð˜iÃÃ̅>˜£x “ˆ˜ÕÌiÃ]>>“ˆÌœ˜ÀiÈ`i˜ÌVœÕ`ÕÃiÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ̜}iÌvÀœ“-̜˜iÞ ÀiiŽ̜`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜]œÀ>ÀiÈ`i˜ÌœvœÕ˜ÌœÞˆ˜>ÀŽ…>“VœÕ`Ài>V… œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜>ÀŽ…>“°˜ ÕÀ…>“>˜`>Ìœ˜,i}ˆœ˜Ã]̅i>ŽiŜÀiVœÀÀˆ`œÀ ˆÃ>«iÀviV̏ޏœV>Ìi`À>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÀœÕÌi°7ˆÌ…vÀiµÕi˜ÌÃiÀۈVi>˜`v>Ài ˆ˜Ìi}À>̈œ˜]Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆVœÕ``À>“>̈V>ÞŜÀÌi˜ÌÀ>Ûi̈“iÃ]ˆ˜VÀi>Ãi V>«>VˆÌÞ]ÃÕ««œÀÌ“>œÀi“«œÞ“i˜Ì`iÛiœ«“i˜Ì>ÌÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã]>˜`ˆ“«ÀœÛi ̅iivwVˆi˜VÞœvLÕÃœ«iÀ>̈œ˜ÃLÞˆ˜VÀi>Ș}Àˆ`iÀÌÕÀ˜œÛiÀ° By knitting together the region’s patchwork of local transit systems, regional rail can SWKEMN[CPFEJGCRN[KORTQXGVJGKTGHƂEKGPE[ and increase their ridership. 14- 95 - Areas Within 60 Mins of origin, not of pearson airport A vastly greater area can be reached within a reasonable commute time when regional rail service is introduced. This is true as much from Pearson Airport, Downtown Brampton, or Downtown Markham as it is from Union Station. PEARSON AIRPORT With Exisiting Local Transit With Existing Local Transit + Trillium + GO Bus DOWNTOWN BRAMPTON DOWNTOWN MARKHAM UNION STATION 15 CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL - 96 - PROVIDING A FOUNDATION FOR FUTURE GROWTH œœŽˆ˜}̜̅ivÕÌÕÀi]Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ«ÀœÛˆ`iÃ>˜ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀiÕ«œ˜܅ˆV…̅i ˜iÌܜÀŽV>˜}ÀœÜiÛi˜“œÀi°7…i̅iÀˆÌLi>`>«Ìˆ˜}œÌ…iÀÀ>ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ̜ VÀi>ÌiVÀœÃÃ̜ܘˆ˜iÃ]œÀLՈ`ˆ˜}ŜÀÌëÕÀÃœÀ`ˆÛiÀȜ˜Ãˆ˜Ìœ}ÀœÜˆ˜}Ài}ˆœ˜> …ÕLÃ]̅iiÝ«>˜ÃˆÛi˜iÃÃ>˜`yi݈LˆˆÌÞœvÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆi˜>LiÃÓ>]ˆ˜VÀi“i˜Ì> >``ˆÌˆœ˜Ã̜LÀˆ˜}…ˆ}…‡µÕ>ˆÌÞÃiÀۈVi̜˜iÜ“>ÀŽiÌÃ]iˆ“ˆ˜>̈˜}̅i˜ii`̜ LՈ`i˜ÌˆÀiÞ˜i܏ˆ˜ið ,i}ˆœ˜>À>ˆˆÃ>˜iÃÃi˜Ìˆ>ˆ˜ÛiÃ̓i˜Ìˆ˜/œÀœ˜Ìœ½ÃvÕÌÕÀi°>ÃÌ]vÀiµÕi˜Ì] âiÀœ‡i“ˆÃȜ˜ÃÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃÀ՘˜ˆ˜}i˜ÌˆÀiÞœ˜i݈Ã̈˜}VœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ…>Ûi̅i«œÌi˜Ìˆ>̜ À>`ˆV>ÞÌÀ>˜ÃvœÀ“̅iÀi>V…>˜`iÝ«iÀˆi˜ViœvÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌˆ˜̅iÀi}ˆœ˜]ëii`ˆ˜} i݈Ã̈˜}ÌÀˆ«Ã>˜`“>Žˆ˜}«œÃÈLiVœÕ˜ÌiÃÃÌÀˆ«Ã̅>ÌÜiÀi«ÀiۈœÕÏÞˆ“«œÃÈLi° ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`܈̅œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ>˜`À՘˜ˆ˜}>Ì…ˆ}…vÀiµÕi˜VˆiÃ]Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆVœÕ` LiVœ“i̅iL>VŽLœ˜iœv>ÌÀՏÞ՘ˆwi`Ài}ˆœ˜>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ˜iÌܜÀŽ° 16- 97 - iÀÀˆVŽˆÛiȘ>˜>«>À̓i˜Ì˜i>À -V>ÀiÌÌ>˜` }ˆ˜Ìœ˜ˆ˜ ̜LˆVœŽi>˜`…>à Lii˜>««Þˆ˜}vœÀܜÀŽ>œÛiÀ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜° i`œiؽÌ…>Ûi̜ˆ“ˆÌ…ˆ“Ãiv̜/œÀœ˜Ìœ >˜Þ“œÀi]˜œÜ̅>Ì/ÀˆˆÕ“Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆV>˜ µÕˆVŽÞ>˜`>vvœÀ`>LÞÌ>Ži…ˆ“>˜Þ܅iÀi…i ˜ii`Ã̜}œ°iÕÃÌ}œÌœvviÀi`>œL>Ì> `ˆÃÌÀˆLṎœ˜Vi˜ÌÀiˆ˜ À>“«Ìœ˜°˜̅i«>ÃÌ] ̅>ÌܜՏ`…>Ûi“i>˜Ì>˜…œÕÀ‡>˜`‡>‡…>vÌÀˆ« œ˜vœÕÀœV>LÕÃiÃp>˜`>`œÕLiv>Ài°7ˆÌ… /ÀˆˆÕ“]…iÌ>ŽiÃ̅i }ˆ˜Ìœ˜ ÀœÃÃ̜ܘ7iÃÌ ,/vœÀÌܜ“ˆ˜ÕÌiÃ̜œÕ˜Ì i˜˜ˆÃ-Ì>̈œ˜] Àˆ`iÃ̅i/ÀˆˆÕ“ÌÀ>ˆ˜vœÀiÃÃ̅>˜Ó䓈˜ÕÌià ̜ À>“>i>-Ì>̈œ˜]>˜`̅i˜Ì>ŽiÃ>µÕˆVŽ ÌÀˆ«œ˜̅iLÕÃ̜…ˆÃ˜i܍œL° iÃÃ̅>˜{x“ˆ˜ÕÌiȘ>p>˜` ̅>˜ŽÃ̜v>Àiˆ˜Ìi}À>̈œ˜]…iV>˜ `œˆÌ>œ˜>Ș}iv>Ài° I/…iۈ}˜iÌÌiV…>À>VÌiÀȏÕÃÌÀ>Ìi̅iÃÌÀÕ}}iÃœvVœ““ÕÌiÀÃ]>˜`>ÀivœÀ“i`L>Ãi`œ˜Ài>ˆviiÝ>“«ià 17- 98 - K iÞ̜«>˜˜ˆ˜}>ÃÕVViÃÃvՏ>˜`VœÃ̇ivviV̈ÛiÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ ˜iÌܜÀŽˆÃ̅iÌÀi>̓i˜Ìœv̅i˜iÌܜÀŽ>Ã>˜ˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi` ܅œi° >V…>ëiVÌœv̅iÃÞÃÌi“v՘`>“i˜Ì>Þ>vviVÌÃiÛiÀÞ œÌ…iÀ>ëiVÌ]ܘœÌ…ˆ˜}V>˜Li`iÈ}˜i`ˆ˜ˆÃœ>̈œ˜°/…i «iÀvœÀ“>˜ViV…>À>VÌiÀˆÃ̈Ví«>À̈VՏ>ÀÞLÀ>Žˆ˜}>˜`>VViiÀ>̈œ˜®>˜` V>«>VˆÌÞœvÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã­Àœˆ˜}Ã̜VŽ®`iÌiÀ“ˆ˜iÃ…œÜ“ÕV…ÌÀ>VŽV>«>VˆÌÞ ܈LiÀiµÕˆÀi`]…œÜ“ÕV…iiVÌÀˆV>ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi܈Li˜ii`i`]̅i Üiˆ}…ÌÃvœÀ܅ˆV…ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀiˆŽiLÀˆ`}iÃ>˜`œÛiÀ«>ÃÃiÓÕÃÌLi `iÈ}˜i`]>˜`…œÜÃÌ>̈œ˜ÃŜՏ`Li`iÈ}˜i`° œ˜ÛiÀÃiÞ]ÃÌ>̈œ˜ `iÈ}˜`iÌiÀ“ˆ˜iÃ̅iV…œˆViœvÀœˆ˜}Ã̜VŽpˆv̅i“>ˆ˜ÃÌ>̈œ˜…>à Ó>«>ÌvœÀ“Ã>˜`˜>ÀÀœÜ>VViÃ뜈˜ÌÃ]Ó>iÀLÕÌ“œÀivÀiµÕi˜Ì ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>ÀiˆŽiÞ>LiÌÌiÀ>««Àœ>V…̅>˜>À}iÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã°/…iÃi>Àiœ˜Þ> Ó>˜Õ“LiÀœvÜ>ÞÃ̅>Ì`ˆvviÀi˜Ì>ëiVÌÃœv̅iˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi>vviVÌ i>V…œÌ…iÀ]˜iViÃÈÌ>̈˜}ˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`«>˜˜ˆ˜}° START WITH A TIMETABLE œÀ̅iÃiÀi>ܘÃ]LiÃ̇«À>V̈Vi“>œÀ}œL>Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi «ÀœiVÌÃÃÌ>ÀÌ܈̅`iÈ}˜ˆ˜}̅ï“iÌ>Li̅>Ì܈LiiÝ«iVÌi`̜ œ«iÀ>Ìi܅i˜̅i«ÀœiV̈ÃVœ“«iÌi`pLivœÀi>Ș}iŜÛiœv `ˆÀ̈ÃÌÕÀ˜i`°/…ˆÃˆÃ˜œÌȓ«Þ>ÃiÀۈVi«>˜ˆ˜`ˆV>̈˜}L>ÈVÃiÀۈVi «>ÌÌiÀ˜Ã>˜`vÀiµÕi˜Vˆið̈Ã>`iÌ>ˆi`̈“iÌ>Lip ÕÀœ«i>˜Ài}ˆœ˜> À>ˆ«>˜˜iÀÃŽ˜œÜ>`iV>`iˆ˜>`Û>˜Vi܅ˆV…ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã܈Li`i«>À̈˜} >ÌÇ\£x]Ç\£n]Ç\Ó£]iÌViÌiÀ>°-ÕV…>«>˜ˆ˜VÕ`iëÀiVˆÃi«iÀvœÀ“>˜Vi Each aspect of the system fundamentally affects every other aspect, so nothing can be designed in isolation Implementing a Regional Rail Network 18- 99 - œÀ>✘ˆÛiȘ-V>ÀLœÀœÕ}…>˜`ܜÀŽÃÕÃÌÜiÃÌ œv̅iˆ˜>˜Vˆ> ˆÃÌÀˆV̘i>ÀÀœ˜Ì>˜`-«>`ˆ˜>° ivœÀi /ÀˆˆÕ“]Åi̜œŽ̅iLÕÃ̜̅i,/̜̅i œœÀ‡ >˜vœÀ̅ ÃÕLÜ>Þ̜̅i9œ˜}iÃÕLÜ>ÞLivœÀiÜ>Žˆ˜}vÀœ“̅i ÃÕLÜ>Þ̜…iÀœvwVi°ÌÜ>Ã>œ˜i…œÕÀ>˜`ÌÜi˜ÌÞ“ˆ˜ÕÌi ÌÀˆ«]>˜`iÛiÀÞ`>ÞÅiÃÌÀÕ}}i`̜õÕiiâiœ˜Ìœ̅i 9œ˜}iÃÕLÜ>ÞÌÀ>˜ÃviÀÀˆ˜}>Ì9œ˜}i‡ œœÀÃÌ>̈œ˜p> ÈÌÕ>̈œ˜̅>Ì“>`i…iÀVœ˜Ãˆ`iÀLÕވ˜}>V>À>vÌiÀ̅i «>˜`i“ˆV°"ÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃÜiÀi˜iÛiÀ>˜œ«Ìˆœ˜LiV>ÕÃiœv̅i `œÕLiv>Ài܈̅// >˜`̅i>VŽœvÃV…i`Տiœ«Ìˆœ˜Ã° œÜ]ÅiV>˜Àˆ`i/ÀˆˆÕ“vœÀ̅iÃ>“iv>Ài>Ã// ]}iÌ `œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜ˆ˜…>v̅ï“i]>˜`Åi`œiؽÌ…>Ûi̜ܜÀÀÞ >LœÕÌ̅iœÛiÀVÀœÜ`i`ÃÕLÜ>Þ>˜Þ“œÀi° Ûi˜LiÌÌiÀ]ÅiV>˜}iÌœvv>Ì̅iLÀ>˜`˜iÜ -«>`ˆ˜>Ã̜«]ÜÅi`œiؽÌ…>Ûi̜ܜÀÀÞ >LœÕÌ̅iVÀœÜ`Ã>Ì1˜ˆœ˜­>˜`Åi>Ü>Þà }iÌÃ>Ãi>Ìœ˜̅iÜ>Þ…œ“it®° V…>À>VÌiÀˆÃ̈VÃœv̅iÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̜Liœ«iÀ>Ìi`]>ÃÜi>à «ÀœiVÌi`VÀœÜ`ˆ˜}­Ü…ˆV…}œÛiÀ˜ÃÃÌ>̈œ˜`Üi̈“iî° iÈ}˜ˆ˜}ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi܈̅œÕÌ>`iÌ>ˆi`«ÀœiVÌi` ̈“iÌ>Li̅>̈˜VœÀ«œÀ>ÌiÃ>vՏ>˜`ˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi` ՘`iÀÃÌ>˜`ˆ˜}œv>>ëiVÌÃœv̅i«>˜˜i`œ«iÀ>̈œ˜ˆÃ >ÀiVˆ«ivœÀœÛiÀLՈ`ˆ˜}p«œÌi˜Ìˆ>ÞÜ>Ã̈˜}Lˆˆœ˜Ãœv `œ>ÀÃœ˜՘˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi° /…iÀi>Ài“>˜ÞiÝ>“«iÃœvˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi̅>Ì…>Ûi ˜ii`i`̜LiÀiLՈÌ܅i˜̅iÞÜiÀi˜œÌ`iÈ}˜i` >ë>ÀÌœv>Vœ“«Ài…i˜ÃˆÛiœ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ã«>˜]ˆ˜VÕ`ˆ˜} ˆ˜̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜°/…ˆÃˆÃ«>À̈VՏ>ÀÞˆ“«œÀÌ>˜Ìˆ˜ ̅iVœ˜ÌiÝÌœvÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ]܅ˆV…ÀiµÕˆÀiÃVœ“«iÝ ˆ˜Ìi}À>̈œ˜܈̅œÌ…iÀ˜iÌܜÀŽÕÃiÀÃ]ˆŽivÀiˆ}…Ì À>ˆ]6Ƃ,>ˆ]>˜`Vœ˜˜iV̈˜}ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ>}i˜Vˆið7iÃÌ >ÀLœÕÀ"-Ì>̈œ˜ˆ˜>“ˆÌœ˜]vœÀiÝ>“«i]Ü>à LՈÌœ˜̅iÜÕ̅È`iœv̅iVœÀÀˆ`œÀ]iÛi˜̅œÕ}… ̅>Ì“i>˜Ì̅>Ì"ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̅iÀivœÀi˜ii`̜VÀœÃÃ̅i «>̅œv vÀiˆ}…ÌÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃÀ՘˜ˆ˜}̜ ˆ>}>À>°*>ÌvœÀ“à œ˜̅i˜œÀ̅È`iܜՏ`…>Ûi“>`i̅>Ì՘˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞ° œÜ˜ÃۈiÜ*>ÀŽÃÌ>̈œ˜…>ÃLii˜`iÈ}˜i`̜ >VVœ““œ`>Ìi>̅ˆÀ`iÝ«ÀiÃÃÌÀ>VŽLÞ«>ÃȘ}̅i «>ÌvœÀ“Ã]iÛi˜̅œÕ}…ÃiÀۈVi«>˜Ãˆ˜`ˆV>Ìi̅>Ì ˆÌ܈LiÃiÀÛi`LÞLœÌ…iÝ«ÀiÃÃ>˜`œV>ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã° ƂÌ Àœ˜ÌiÃÌ>̈œ˜]>ÃÌ>̈œ˜>VViÃÃLՈ`ˆ˜}>˜`À>“« ÜiÀiÀiVi˜ÌÞLՈÌ`ˆÀiV̏Þˆ˜̅i«>̅œv>vœÕÀ̅ÌÀ>VŽ] ܅ˆV…ܜՏ`Li˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞvœÀvÀiµÕi˜ÌiÝ«ÀiÃÃ>˜` œV>ÃiÀۈVi°œÃ̈“«œÀÌ>˜ÌÞ]1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜Ü>à ÀiVi˜ÌÞÀiLՈÌ܈̅œÕÌV…>˜}ˆ˜}̅iœÀˆ}ˆ˜>>ޜÕÌ vÀœ“̅i£™ÓäðÌÏ>ޜṎ˜VÕ`i`iÛiÀÞÃiVœ˜` «>ÌvœÀ“Liˆ˜}ÛiÀÞ˜>ÀÀœÜȘViˆÌÜ>Ã`iÈ}˜i` vœÀœ>`ˆ˜}>˜`՘œ>`ˆ˜}Ã>VŽÃœv“>ˆvÀœ“œ˜} `ˆÃÌ>˜ViÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã°/…iÃi«>ÌvœÀ“Ã>Ài˜œÜLiˆ˜}ÕÃi` LÞ̅œÕÃ>˜`Ãœv«>ÃÃi˜}iÀÃœ˜"/À>ˆ˜Ã°/…iœÀˆ}ˆ˜> >ޜÕÌÜ>ÃÀiÌ>ˆ˜i`À>̅iÀ̅>˜ÀiLՈ`ˆ˜}œ˜>˜iÜ >ޜÕÌœ«Ìˆ“ˆâi`vœÀvÀiµÕi˜Ì]…ˆ}…‡V>«>VˆÌÞÀi}ˆœ˜> ÃiÀۈVi°/…iÃiŽˆ˜`Ãœv՘˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞiÝ«i˜`ˆÌÕÀiÃV>˜ Li>ۜˆ`i`܅i˜>Vœ“«Ài…i˜ÃˆÛiˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi«>˜] }Ո`i`LÞ>`iÌ>ˆi`œ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ã«>˜]ˆÃVÀi>Ìi`LivœÀi ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀiˆÃLՈÌ° CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 19- 100 - ORGANIZATION BEFORE TECHNOLOGY BEFORE CONCRETE /…iiÀ“>˜‡Ã«i>Žˆ˜}ܜÀ`…>ëÀœ«œÕ˜`i`̅i «>˜˜ˆ˜}>˜`i˜}ˆ˜iiÀˆ˜}`œVÌÀˆ˜iœvºœÀ}>˜ˆâ>̈œ˜ LivœÀiÌiV…˜œœ}ÞLivœÀiVœ˜VÀiÌi°»/…i…ˆ}…iÃÌ «ÀˆœÀˆÌÞˆÃ̜Ài܏ÛiˆÃÃÕiÃœvœÀ}>˜ˆâ>̈œ˜]܅ˆV… ˆ˜VÕ`iÃv>V̜ÀψŽiv>Ài>˜`ÃiÀۈViˆ˜Ìi}À>̈œ˜ LiÌÜii˜>}i˜Vˆið/…i˜]ÌiV…˜œœ}Þ]ÃÕV…>à LiÌÌiÀÈ}˜>ˆ˜}ÃÞÃÌi“Ã>˜`Àœˆ˜}Ã̜VŽ]ŜՏ` Liˆ“«ÀœÛi`°/…i>ÃÌ«ÀˆœÀˆÌÞˆÃ̅iLՈ`ˆ˜}œv ˜i܈˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi]ˆŽi>``ˆÌˆœ˜>ÌÀ>VŽÃ>˜`}À>`i Ãi«>À>̈œ˜Ãœ˜VœÀÀˆ`œÀð/…ˆÃ«ÀˆœÀˆÌˆâ>̈œ˜«ÀœÛˆ`ià ̅i“œÃÌiVœ˜œ“ˆV>ÞivwVˆi˜Ì“i>˜Ãœvˆ“«ÀœÛˆ˜} ÃiÀۈVi>˜`V>«>VˆÌÞœ˜>˜iÌܜÀŽ° -œ]̅iwÀÃÌÌ>Î܅i˜«>˜˜ˆ˜}>“>œÀ ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi«ÀœiV̈Ã̜`iÛiœ«>Vi>À ՘`iÀÃÌ>˜`ˆ˜}œv…œÜ̅i«ÀœiVÌ܈Liˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi` ˆ˜Ìœ̅iLÀœ>`iÀÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ˜iÌܜÀŽ>˜`…œÜˆÌV>˜Li œ«iÀ>Ìi`“œÀiivwVˆi˜ÌÞLÞ>`ÕÃ̈˜}œ«iÀ>̈˜} «À>V̈Við/…iÃiVœ˜`ÃÌi«ˆÃ̜ˆ˜ÛiÃ̈˜ÌiV…˜œœ}Þ ܅iÀi>««Àœ«Àˆ>ÌipÕȘ}>`Û>˜Vi`È}˜>ˆ˜} ÃÞÃÌi“Ã>˜`…ˆ}…iÀ‡«iÀvœÀ“>˜ViÀœˆ˜}Ã̜VŽ̜ õÕiiâi“œÀiV>«>VˆÌÞœÕÌœvi݈Ã̈˜}ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi° /…i˜]œ˜Þ܅i˜˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞ]˜iÜ«…ÞÈV> ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀiŜՏ`LiLՈÌ° /…ˆÃ>««Àœ>V…ÀiµÕˆÀiÃ>܈ˆ˜}˜iÃÃ̜“>Ži ˆ“«œÀÌ>˜Ì`iVˆÃˆœ˜Ã>LœÕÌÃiÀۈVi>˜`ÌiV…˜œœ}Þ Õ«vÀœ˜Ì]À>̅iÀ̅>˜`i>ވ˜}̅i“̜vÕÌÕÀi «…>Ãið/…i˜ii`vœÀëiVˆwVˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi ˆ˜ÛiÃ̓i˜ÌÃ>˜`̅iˆÀŽ˜œVŽ‡œ˜ivviVÌÃœ˜ÃiÀۈVi V>˜̅iÀivœÀiLiV>ÀivՏÞiÛ>Õ>Ìi`>˜`̅iˆÀ ˜ii`>ÃÃiÃÃi`°œÀiÝ>“«i]>À}iiÝ«i˜`ˆÌÕÀiœ˜ }À>`iÃi«>À>̈˜}Àœ>`‡À>ˆVÀœÃȘ}Ó>Þ˜œÌLi ˜ii`i`>Ì“ˆ˜œÀÀœ>`Ã]>Ã̅iÞ“>ÞœvviÀ“ˆ˜ˆ“> Li˜iwÌvœÀ̅iœÛiÀ>˜iÌܜÀŽ°"˜̅iœÌ…iÀ…>˜`] ÀiÌ>ˆ˜ˆ˜}œL܏iÌiÀœˆ˜}Ã̜VŽ“>ÞÀiµÕˆÀiv>À “œÀiiÝ«i˜ÃˆÛiœÀ`Õ«ˆV>Ìiˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi]“œÀi ̅>˜˜i}>̈˜}>˜ÞVœÃÌÃ>ۈ˜}ÃvÀœ“`i>ވ˜}̅i «ÕÀV…>Ș}œvÀi«>Vi“i˜Ìð iÛiœ«ˆ˜}>Vœ“«Ài…i˜ÃˆÛï“iÌ>LivœÀ> ÃÞÃÌi“>Ï>À}i>˜`Vœ“«iÝ>Ã/ÀˆˆÕ““>ÞLi V…>i˜}ˆ˜}°/…>̈Ã܅ވ̓>Þ“>ŽiÃi˜Ãi̜LՈ` œ˜iVœÀÀˆ`œÀ>Ì>̈“i]i˜>Lˆ˜}V…>i˜}iÃ̜Li ՘VœÛiÀi`>˜`œÜiÀˆ˜}œÛiÀ>«ÀœiVÌÀˆÃŽ° Develop overall service plan 1 2 3 4 Develop an infrastructure plan Begin detailed design and construction Develop a timetable incorporating rolling stock characteristics, station constraints, corridor constraints 7>˜`>ÕÃÌ}œÌ>œL>Ì̅i˜i܏ÞÀiœ«i˜i`«>˜Ìˆ˜ "Å>Ü>]>˜`Åi…>ÃLœÕ}…Ì>Vœ˜`œˆ˜̅i˜iÜ`iÛiœ«“i˜Ì œ˜̅iœ`«>ÀŽˆ˜}œÌÃ>Ì*ˆVŽiÀˆ˜}ÃÌ>̈œ˜p̅iÞ½Ài˜œÌ ˜ii`i`>˜Þ“œÀi˜œÜ̅>Ì“œÃÌÀˆ`iÀÃ}iÌ̜̅iÌÀ>ˆ˜œ˜̅i v>Ài‡ˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`LÕð ivœÀi]̅>ÌÌÀˆ«œ˜œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ̜œŽ>˜ …œÕÀ>˜`Ìi˜“ˆ˜ÕÌið7ˆÌ…/ÀˆˆÕ“]ÅiV>˜}iÌ̜"Å>Ü> -Ì>̈œ˜ˆ˜՘`iÀÓ䓈˜ÕÌiÃ]>˜`̅i˜ˆÌ½ÃÕÃÌ>ŜÀÌLÕÃÀˆ`i ̜̅i«>˜Ì°>˜Þœv…iÀVœÜœÀŽiÀÃV…œœÃi̜Ì>Ži/ÀˆˆÕ“̜ ܜÀŽ̜œ]Ì>Žˆ˜}…Õ˜`Ài`ÃœvV>ÀÃœvv̅i{ä£iÛiÀÞ`>Þ° /ÀˆˆÕ“i>ÃiÃVœ˜}iÃ̈œ˜œ˜̅i{ä£>˜` Ài`ÕViÃÛi…ˆVii“ˆÃȜ˜Ã° 20- 101 - GUIDING PRINCIPLES À>܈˜}vÀœ“ˆ˜ÌiÀ˜>̈œ˜>LiÃÌ«À>V̈ViÃ]ˆÌˆÃ«œÃÈLi̜`i“œ˜ÃÌÀ>ÌiwÛi}Ո`ˆ˜}«Àˆ˜Vˆ«ià ̅>ÌvœÀ“«>ÀÌœvÃÕVViÃÃvՏˆ“«i“i˜Ì>̈œ˜ÃœvÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ° >Ãi`œ˜̅iÃi«Àˆ˜Vˆ«iÃ]ˆÌˆÃ «œÃÈLi̜`iÈ}˜>˜iÌܜÀŽ>˜`œ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ã«>˜vœÀ̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜° Two-way, All-day Service /…i“>œÀˆÌÞœvÌÀˆ«Ãˆ˜>˜ÞÀi}ˆœ˜piÛi˜ ܜÀŽÌÀˆ«Ãp`œ˜œÌˆ˜ÛœÛi̅i`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜ VœÀi>˜``œ˜œÌÌ>Ži«>Vi>ÌÀÕÅ…œÕÀ° ƂÃiÀۈVi«>˜̅>Ì«ÀœÛˆ`iÃÃiÀۈVi> `>Þ]iÛiÀÞ`>ÞˆÃiÃÃi˜Ìˆ>ˆv>Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ ÃÞÃÌi“ˆÃ̜LiVœ“i>VœÀi«>ÀÌœv̅i Ài}ˆœ˜>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ˜iÌܜÀŽ° High Frequency (turn up and go) ,iÃi>ÀV…LÞ/À>˜Ã«œÀÌvœÀœ˜`œ˜ ˆ˜`ˆV>ÌiÃ̅>ÌÀˆ`iÀÃœ˜ÀœÕÌiÃ܈̅> vÀiµÕi˜VÞœv£Ó“ˆ˜ÕÌiÃœÀiÃÃ܈ ˜œÌ˜ii`̜Vœ˜ÃՏÌ>ÃV…i`Տi>˜` V>˜ˆ˜ÃÌi>`ȓ«ÞºÌÕÀ˜Õ«>˜`}œ°» /…ˆÃiÛiœvÃiÀۈVi…>ÃLii˜ `i“œ˜ÃÌÀ>Ìi`̜`ÀˆÛi“>œÀˆ˜VÀi>Ãià ˆ˜Àˆ`iÀň«°ÀiµÕi˜VÞˆÃiÛi˜“œÀi ˆ“«œÀÌ>˜Ì܅i˜“>Žˆ˜}Vœ˜˜iV̈œ˜Ã LiV>ÕÃiÜ>ˆÌ̈“iÃV>˜“Տ̈«Þ܅i˜ >ÌÀˆ«ˆ˜ÛœÛiÃÃiÛiÀ>Vœ˜˜iV̈˜} Ãi}“i˜ÌÃ]>˜`>“ˆÃÃi`Vœ˜˜iV̈œ˜ VœÕ`ÀiÃՏ̈˜>˜՘>VVi«Ì>Li`i>Þ° Seamless Integration with Local Transit "˜>LÕÃÞVœ““ÕÌiÀÀ>ˆÃiÀۈViˆŽi" /À>˜ÃˆÌ]«>ÀŽ‡>˜`‡Àˆ`iœÌÃwÕ«i>ÀÞˆ˜ ̅i“œÀ˜ˆ˜}°/…>Ì“>ŽiÃ̅i“ivviV̈ÛiÞ ÕÃiiÃÃvœÀ“ˆ`‡`>ÞÌÀ>ÛiiÀðœÀÌܜ‡Ü>Þ] >‡`>ÞÃiÀۈVi]̅iÀi˜ii`Ã̜Li>˜œÌ…iÀ Ü>Þ̜>VViÃÃ̅iÃÌ>̈œ˜°/À>˜ÃˆÌ‡œÀˆi˜Ìi` `iÛiœ«“i˜ÌV>˜«>Þ>Àœip>˜` «ÀœÛˆ`iÃ>“>œÀœ««œÀÌ՘ˆÌÞvœÀÀiVœÛiÀÞ œvÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆˆ˜ÛiÃ̓i˜ÌpLÕÌ>Ã̅i//  ÃÕLÜ>Þ`i“œ˜ÃÌÀ>ÌiÃ]̅i“œÃÌivviV̈Ûi Ü>Þ̜`iˆÛiÀ>À}i˜Õ“LiÀÃœvÀˆ`iÀÈà LÞÃi>“iÃÏÞˆ˜Ìi}À>̈˜}À>ˆ܈̅œV> LÕÃ>˜`ÃÌÀiiÌV>ÀÃiÀۈVið/…>Ì“i>˜Ã vՏÞˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`v>ÀiÃp>ÌÀ>˜ÃviÀˆÃ>˜ ˆ˜Vœ˜Ûi˜ˆi˜Vi]ÜޜÕŜՏ`˜œÌ…>Ûi̜ «>Þ“œÀivœÀˆÌ°Ì>Ãœ“i>˜Ã…>ۈ˜}LÕà ÀœÕÌiÃ`iÈ}˜i`̜Vœ˜˜iVÌ܈̅ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã] >``ˆÌˆœ˜>À>ˆÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã̜Vœ˜˜iVÌ܈̅ LÕÃÞÃÕÀv>ViVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ]>˜`ÃV…i`Տià ܈̅̈“i`ÌÀ>˜ÃviÀÃ܅iÀi˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞ°/…i œLiV̈ÛiˆÃ̜VÀi>Ìi̅iiµÕˆÛ>i˜Ìœv> ÃÕLÜ>ÞL>VŽLœ˜ivœÀ̅i܅œiÀi}ˆœ˜] ÃiÀۈ˜}œV>ÌÀˆ«Ã>ÓÕV…>Ïœ˜}‡…>Տ° ÞLiˆ˜}>L>VŽLœ˜iœv>LÀœ>`iÀÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ ˜iÌܜÀŽ]Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ`œi؜̍ÕÃÌÃiÀÛi ÀiÈ`i˜ÌÃœv˜iˆ}…LœÕÀ…œœ`Ã>`>Vi˜Ì̜ ÃÌ>̈œ˜ÃpˆÌÃiÀÛiÃiÛiÀޜ˜iˆ˜̅iÀi}ˆœ˜° Focus on Equity *>˜˜ˆ˜}ŜՏ`ˆ˜Ìi˜`̜«ÀˆœÀˆÌˆâi ˆ“«ÀœÛi`>VViÃÃ̜i“«œÞ“i˜Ì œ««œÀÌ՘ˆÌˆiÃ>˜`ÃiÀۈViÃvœÀiµÕˆÌއ ÃiiŽˆ˜}Vœ““Õ˜ˆÌˆið/…ˆÃ“i>˜Ã Ài`ÕVˆ˜}ÌÀ>Ûi̈“iÃ]œV>̈˜}>``ˆÌˆœ˜> ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã܅iÀi̅iÞܜՏ`ÃiÀÛi Vœ““Õ˜ˆÌˆiψŽi̅i ˆÌÞœv/œÀœ˜Ìœ½Ã iˆ}…LœÕÀ…œœ`“«ÀœÛi“i˜ÌƂÀi>Ã]>˜` i˜ÃÕÀˆ˜}̅>Ìv>ÀiÃ>Ài˜œÌ«Àœ…ˆLˆÌˆÛiÞ iÝ«i˜ÃˆÛi°/À>˜ÃˆÌ“ÕÃÌv՘V̈œ˜>Ã>˜ ˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`˜iÌܜÀŽ]«>À̈VՏ>ÀÞvœÀ̅œÃi ܅œÀiÞœ˜ˆÌvœÀ>̅iˆÀÌÀˆ«ÃpÜˆÌ ˆÃˆ“«iÀ>̈Ûi̅>̘œÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ“œ`iLi `ii“i`º«Ài“ˆÕ“°» Integration with Regional Planning 7ˆÌ…ˆÌÃÀi}ˆœ˜‡Üˆ`iiÝÌi˜Ì>˜`…ˆ}… iÛiœvÃiÀۈVi]Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆŜՏ` LiVœ“i>Vi˜ÌÀi«ˆiViœvÀi}ˆœ˜> «>˜˜ˆ˜}°˜ œ«i˜…>}i˜]vœÀiÝ>“«i] >ÃÕLÃÌ>˜Ìˆ>œvwVi`iÛiœ«“i˜ÌÓÕÃÌ LiœV>Ìi`܈̅ˆ˜Ü>Žˆ˜}`ˆÃÌ>˜Viœv> À>ˆÃÌ>̈œ˜°£Î/…ˆÃܜՏ`˜œÌLi«œÃÈLi ̜`>Þˆ˜/œÀœ˜Ìœ]}ˆÛi˜̅iˆ“ˆÌi`Èâi œv̅ii݈Ã̈˜}À>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ˜iÌܜÀŽ]LÕÌ ˆÌVœÕ`Li«œÃÈLi܈̅Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ° Àii˜wi`ÃÕLÕÀL>˜`iÛiœ«“i˜ÌÃVœÕ` Li`iÈ}˜i`>ÀœÕ˜`À>ˆÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã]VÀi>̈˜} º£x‡“ˆ˜ÕÌiVœ““Õ˜ˆÌˆiû£{œÀˆi˜Ìi`̜ Ü>Žˆ˜}>˜`VÞVˆ˜}]À>̅iÀ̅>˜vœœÜˆ˜} ̅iÌÀ>`ˆÌˆœ˜>>Õ̜‡œÀˆi˜Ìi`«>ÌÌiÀ˜ Vi˜ÌÀi`œ˜Vœ˜ViÃȜ˜Àœ>`LœVŽÃ° ,i}ˆœ˜>À>ˆˆÃ̅i“œÃÌvi>ÈLi«>̅ ̜>ÌÀՏÞÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ‡œÀˆi˜Ìi`Ài}ˆœ˜° 1 2 3 4 5 CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 21- 102 - Applying Best Practices The Trillium Regional Rail Network UȘ}̅i}Ո`ˆ˜}«Àˆ˜Vˆ«ià œÕ̏ˆ˜i`ˆ˜̅ˆÃÀi«œÀÌ] >˜`L>Ãi`œ˜}œL>LiÃÌ «À>V̈ViÃ]Üi«Àœ«œÃi ̅i`iÛiœ«“i˜Ìœv>/ÀˆˆÕ“ ,i}ˆœ˜>,>ˆ iÌܜÀŽ̜ÃiÀÛi ̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜°/ÀˆˆÕ“ˆÃ Vœ“«ÀˆÃi`œv>L>Ãi˜iÌܜÀŽœvvœÕÀ ˆ˜iÃ>˜`˜ˆ˜iÃiÀۈViÃ]ÃiÀۈ˜}̅i >ŽiŜÀi]-̜Õvvۈi]ˆÌV…i˜iÀ] >˜` >ÀÀˆiVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ܈̅>‡`>Þ iiVÌÀˆwi`ÃiÀۈVi°v>˜>}Àii“i˜Ì ܈̅ >˜>`ˆ>˜*>VˆwVˆÃ«œÃÈLi] ̅iˆÌœ˜VœÀÀˆ`œÀܜՏ`>ÃœLi ˆ˜VÕ`i`° i>ÀÞ>ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ãˆ˜̅ˆÃ L>Ãi˜iÌܜÀŽ܈ÃiiÃiÀۈViiÛiÀÞ£ä “ˆ˜ÕÌiÃœÀLiÌÌiÀ>`>Þ]܈̅>“ˆÝœv iÝ«ÀiÃÃ>˜`œV>ÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃÀ>«ˆ`Þˆ˜Žˆ˜} ̅i“̜̅iÀiÃÌ œv̅iÀi}ˆœ˜°/…ÀœÕ}…VœÃi ˆ˜Ìi}À>̈œ˜܈̅œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ] /ÀˆˆÕ“܈À>`ˆV>Þˆ˜VÀi>ÃiÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ >VViÃÈLˆˆÌÞˆ˜̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜] LÀˆ˜}ˆ˜}«iœ«iVœÃiÀ̜}i̅iÀ° /œÃÕ««œÀÌ̅ˆÃۈȜ˜vœÀ…ˆ}…‡µÕ>ˆÌÞÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ]ÜiLiˆiÛiˆÌ ˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞ̜“>Ži>˜Õ“LiÀœvÃÌÀ>Ìi}ˆVˆ˜ÛiÃ̓i˜ÌȘ̅i˜iÌܜÀŽ\ • 7ÀˆÌˆ˜}>w˜>ÃÞÃÌi“̈“iÌ>LivœÀ̅i/ÀˆˆÕ“˜iÌܜÀŽ] ܅ˆV…V>˜ÃiÀÛi>Ã>}Ո`iLœœŽvœÀˆ˜ÛiÃ̓i˜ÌȘ ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞ̜>V…ˆiÛiˆÌ° • iVÌÀˆvވ˜}>ˆ˜iÃi}“i˜ÌȘ̅iƂ‡ >Þ/ÀˆˆÕ“ >Ãi iÌܜÀŽ̜ÃÕ««œÀÌ…ˆ}…‡V>«>VˆÌÞ]…ˆ}…‡Ã«ii`œ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ã >VÀœÃÃ̅ii˜ÌˆÀiÃÞÃÌi“° • ,iˆ“>}ˆ˜ˆ˜}1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜܈̅viÜiÀÌÀ>VŽÃ>˜`viÜiÀ]LÕÌ ܈`iÀ]«>ÌvœÀ“Ã̜v>VˆˆÌ>ÌiVˆÀVՏ>̈œ˜]>˜`“ˆ˜ˆ“ˆâiÌÀ>ˆ˜ `Üi̈“ið • ,i«>Vˆ˜}̅iVÕÀÀi˜Ì"/À>˜ÃˆÌ`ˆiÃiLˆiÛiyiiÌ܈̅ “œ`iÀ˜iiVÌÀˆVÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃV>«>Liœv…ˆ}…iÀëii`Ã>˜`v>ÃÌiÀ >VViiÀ>̈œ˜° • >Žˆ˜}Ì>À}iÌi`ˆ˜ÛiÃ̓i˜ÌȘÌÀ>VŽ]È}˜>]>˜`Þ>À` ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi̜ÃÕ««œÀÌ…ˆ}…iÀV>«>VˆÌÞ]…ˆ}…iÀÀiˆ>LˆˆÌÞ œ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ã܈̅viÜiÀVœ˜yˆVÌÃLiÌÜii˜ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã° • Ƃ``ˆ˜}ˆ˜wÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã̜v>VˆˆÌ>Ìi/ÀˆˆÕ“½Ãˆ˜Ìi}À>̈œ˜܈̅ œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ]>˜`̜ÃÕ««œÀÌÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ‡œÀˆi˜Ìi``iÛiœ«“i˜Ì° • ƂÌ>À}iÌi`ÃÌÕ`Þ̜՘`iÀÃÌ>˜`܅>Ì܈`À>Ü/œÀœ˜Ìœ >Ài>VÕÃ̜“iÀÃ̜Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ]>˜`̜i˜>LiLÀœ>`iÀ «>˜˜ˆ˜}vœÀ…œÜ̜ˆ˜VœÀ«œÀ>ÌiÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆˆ˜Ìœ̅iLÀœ>`iÀ iVœ˜œ“ˆVÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi° /œ}i̅iÀ]̅iÃiˆ˜ÛiÃ̓i˜ÌÃ܈«>Ûi̅iÜ>ÞvœÀ̅i ˆ“«i“i˜Ì>̈œ˜œv>ÌÀ>˜ÃvœÀ“>̈Ûi]ÞiÌ>vvœÀ`>Li]iÝ«>˜Ãˆœ˜œv ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÃiÀۈVi>VÀœÃÃ̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜° 22- 103 - THE TRILLIUM REGIONAL RAIL PLAN 1. Service Plan /ÀˆˆÕ“܈œvviÀÃiÀۈViœ˜ˆÌÃVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ>̏i>ÃÌ iÛiÀޣ䓈˜ÕÌiÃ]>`>Þ]iÛiÀÞ`>Þ]ÜÀˆ`iÀÃV>˜ LiViÀÌ>ˆ˜̅>Ì̅iÞ܈Li>Li̜ŜÜÕ«>Ì ̅iÃÌ>̈œ˜>˜`V>ÌV…>ÌÀ>ˆ˜܅i˜iÛiÀ̅iÞ˜ii` ̜°"˜̅iLÕÈiÃÌVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ]«>À̈VՏ>ÀÞ̅ÀœÕ}… `i˜ÃiÞ«œ«Õ>Ìi`>Ài>ÃVœÃiÀ̜̅iVœÀi]ÃiÀۈVi VœÕ`Li>ÓÕV…>ÃiÛiÀÞwÛi“ˆ˜ÕÌiÃ]i˜ÃÕÀˆ˜} >`iµÕ>ÌiV>«>VˆÌÞ̅>Ì“ˆÀÀœÀÃ̅iÃÕLÜ>Þ iÛiœvÃiÀۈVi°œÀœ˜}iÀ`ˆÃÌ>˜ViÌÀˆ«Ã]ÃÕV… >Ã̜ >ÀÀˆi]>“ˆÌœ˜É ˆ>}>À>]>˜`ˆÌV…i˜iÀ] iÝ«ÀiÃÃÃiÀۈVi܈Li«ÀœÛˆ`i`̜i˜ÃÕÀï“i‡ Vœ“«ï̈ÛiœÕÀ˜iÞð/…>˜ŽÃ̜iiVÌÀˆwV>̈œ˜] “œ`iÀ˜“Տ̈«i‡Õ˜ˆÌÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã]>˜`ˆ˜VÀi>Ãi` Àiˆ>LˆˆÌÞ]ÌÀ>Ûi̈“iÃœ˜̅iœV>ÃiÀۈViÃ܈Li Vœ˜Ãˆ`iÀ>LÞv>ÃÌiÀ̅>˜̜`>Þ°"˜iÝ«ÀiÃÃÃiÀۈVià ÌÀ>Ûi̈“iÃ܈Li}i>Ài`̜“iiÌœÀLi>Ì`ÀˆÛˆ˜} ̈“ið œÀÀˆ`œÀÃœ˜iˆÌ…iÀÈ`iœv̅iÀi}ˆœ˜ ܈Li«>ˆÀi`Ü̅>ÌÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃV>˜À՘̅ÀœÕ}…] i˜>Lˆ˜}VÀœÃÇÀi}ˆœ˜œÕÀ˜iÞÃ܅ˆiiˆ“ˆ˜>̈˜} ̅i˜ii`vœÀÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̜œVVÕ«ÞÃV>ÀVië>Vi>Ì 1˜ˆœ˜>Ã̅iÞÌÕÀ˜>ÀœÕ˜`°/…iÞ܈Li}ˆÛi˜ ȓ«i˜Õ“iÀˆV>ÀœÕÌi˜>“iÃ]ˆŽi̅iÃÕLÜ>Þ]̜ ˆ“«ÀœÛiȓ«ˆVˆÌÞ>˜`>VViÃÈLˆˆÌÞvœÀÀˆ`iÀð/…i ÃiÀۈVi«>˜ˆÃ`iÈ}˜i`̜LiVÕÃ̜“iÀ‡vœVÕÃi`] >˜``iÈ}˜i`̜Ãi>“iÃÏÞˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi܈̅œÌ…iÀ “œ`iÃ]ˆ˜VÕ`ˆ˜}œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ>˜`˜iÜ“œLˆˆÌÞ ÌiV…˜œœ}ˆiðÌ܈ÃiÀÛiŽiÞÕÀL>˜Vi˜ÌÀiÃ>VÀœÃà ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜]>ÃÜi>ÃœvviÀ`ˆÀiVÌvÀiµÕi˜ÌÃiÀۈVi ̜*i>Àܘ˜ÌiÀ˜>̈œ˜>ƂˆÀ«œÀÌ° 2. Rolling Stock /ÀˆˆÕ“܈ÕÃi«ÀœÛi˜]œvv‡Ì…i‡Ã…iviiVÌÀˆV “Տ̈«i‡Õ˜ˆÌÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃVÕÀÀi˜ÌÞœ«iÀ>Ìi`LÞÀi}ˆœ˜> À>ˆÃiÀۈViȘ ÕÀœ«iœÀƂÈ>°/…iÀiˆÃ>܈`i Û>ÀˆiÌÞœvÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃÕ««ˆiÀÃ܅œ«Àœ`ÕViÃՈÌ>Li ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã]ˆ˜VÕ`ˆ˜}ƂÃ̜“É œ“L>À`ˆiÀ>˜`-ˆi“i˜Ã] ܅œ>Ài>`Þ«Àœ`ÕViÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃvœÀ̅i >˜>`ˆ>˜ “>ÀŽiÌ°/…iÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã܈Li`iÈ}˜i`̜«ÀœÛˆ`i >`iµÕ>ÌiÃi>̈˜}vœÀœ˜}‡`ˆÃÌ>˜ViÌÀ>ÛiiÀÃLÕÌ ܈Liœ«Ìˆ“ˆâi`vœÀvÀiµÕi˜ÌÌÕÀ˜œÛiÀˆŽi̅i ÃÕLÜ>Þ°/…ˆÃ“i>˜Ã̅>Ì̅iÞ܈…>Ûi>̏i>ÃÌ ̅ÀiiÃiÌÃœv`œœÀÃœ˜i>V…È`iœv>V>À]>˜`̅iÞ ܈Li`iÈ}˜i`̜“>݈“ˆâiˆ˜ÌiÀ˜>VˆÀVՏ>̈œ˜] «œÌi˜Ìˆ>Þ̅ÀœÕ}…Ș}i‡iÛi`iÈ}˜܅iÀi «œÃÈLi°/…iÞ܈Liȓˆ>Àˆ˜i˜}̜̅i݈Ã̈˜} "ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã]LÕÌiÛi˜ˆv̅iÞ…>ÛiœÜiÀV>«>VˆÌÞ «iÀÌÀ>ˆ˜]̅iÞ܈“œÀi̅>˜“>ŽiÕ«vœÀ̅>Ì ܈̅Vœ˜Ãˆ`iÀ>LÞˆ˜VÀi>Ãi`vÀiµÕi˜VÞ°-Ì>̈œ˜Ã ܈…>Ûi«>ÌvœÀ“Ã̅>Ì>ÀiiÛi܈̅ÌÀ>ˆ˜`œœÀà ̜i˜>Lii>ÃÞ>˜`܅iiV…>ˆÀ‡>VViÃÈLiœ>`ˆ˜} >˜`՘œ>`ˆ˜}°ƂVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ>Ài̜LiiiVÌÀˆwi` ܅iÀiÛiÀ«œÃÈLi]܅ˆii˜ÃÕÀˆ˜}vՏVœ“«>̈LˆˆÌÞ ܈̅vÀiˆ}…ÌÃiÀۈVi°/À>ˆ˜Ãœ«iÀ>̈˜}œ˜Ài>̈ÛiÞ ŜÀ̘œ˜‡iiVÌÀˆwi`Ãi}“i˜ÌÃVœÕ`ÕÃiÀ>«ˆ`Þ >`Û>˜Vˆ˜}L>ÌÌiÀÞÌiV…˜œœ}Þ° 3. Fare Policy /ÀˆˆÕ“܈LivՏÞˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`܈̅œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ] i˜>Lˆ˜}Àˆ`iÀÃ̜ÕÃiˆÌ>Ã>«>ÀÌœv̅iˆÀÃi>“iÃà œÕÀ˜iÞˆ˜VÕ`ˆ˜}LÕÃiÃ]ÃÕLÜ>ÞÃ]>˜`,/°/…ˆÃ ˆÃœÕ̏ˆ˜i`ˆ˜̅i«ÀiۈœÕÃ/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜ œ>À` œv/À>`iÀi«œÀÌœ˜v>Ài>˜`ÃiÀۈViˆ˜Ìi}À>̈œ˜] Erasing the Invisible Line°ƂÀˆ`iÀV>˜Li}ˆ˜̅iˆÀ œÕÀ˜iÞœ˜> À>“«Ìœ˜/À>˜ÃˆÌLÕÃ]Àˆ`i̜̅i ˜i>ÀiÃÌ/ÀˆˆÕ“ÃÌ>̈œ˜]V>ÌV…>ÌÀ>ˆ˜̜ }ˆ˜Ìœ˜] >˜`Àˆ`i̅i }ˆ˜Ìœ˜ ÀœÃÃ̜ܘ,/̜̅iˆÀw˜> `iÃ̈˜>̈œ˜>Ì9œ˜}i>˜` }ˆ˜Ìœ˜]«>ވ˜}>v>Ài L>Ãi`œ˜̅i`ˆÃÌ>˜Vi̅iÞ>ÀiÌÀ>Ûiˆ˜}À>̅iÀ ̅>˜œ˜iL>Ãi`œ˜̅i˜Õ“LiÀœv>}i˜VˆiÃ̅iÞ ÕÃi`°,iÈ`i˜ÌÃ܈̅ˆ˜̅i ˆÌÞœv/œÀœ˜ÌœV>˜ÕÃi ̅i/ÀˆˆÕ“ÃiÀۈVivœÀ̅iÃ>“iv>Ài̅>Ì̅iÞ«>Þ vœÀ̅i// ° 4. Union Station 1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜܈LiVœ˜ÛiÀÌi`vÀœ“>ÌÀ>`ˆÌˆœ˜> ˆ˜ÌiÀVˆÌÞÃÌ>̈œ˜̜>˜ÕÀL>˜Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÃÌ>̈œ˜] ܈̅viÜiÀLÕÌ“ÕV…܈`iÀ]Ã>viÀ]>˜`“œÀi Vœ“vœÀÌ>Li«>ÌvœÀ“Ã`iÈ}˜i`̜i˜>LiÀˆ`iÀà ̜Ü>ˆÌvœÀ̅iˆÀÌÀ>ˆ˜Ãœ˜̅i«>ÌvœÀ“° Üi̈“ià ܈LivÕÀ̅iÀÀi`ÕVi`]ˆ˜VÀi>Ș}V>«>VˆÌÞ]LÞ «ÀœÛˆ`ˆ˜}܈`iÃÌ>ˆÀV>ÃiÃ̅>Ìi˜>Li̅iÀ>«ˆ` Vi>Àˆ˜}œv>«>ÌvœÀ“>vÌiÀ>ÌÀ>ˆ˜>ÀÀˆÛið1˜ˆœ˜ -Ì>̈œ˜܈Ì>Ži>`Û>˜Ì>}iœv̅i˜iÜ>VViÃà «œˆ˜ÌÃ>Û>ˆ>Li̅ÀœÕ}…̅iVœ˜ÃÌÀÕV̈œ˜œv̅i 9œÀŽ>˜` >ÞVœ˜VœÕÀÃið >V…ÌÀ>ˆ˜ÀœÕÌi܈ >ÀÀˆÛi>Ì̅iÃ>“i«>ÌvœÀ“iÛiÀÞ̈“i]ÜÀˆ`iÀà Ž˜œÜiÝ>V̏Þ܅iÀi̅iÞ˜ii`̜}œ°/…iÃiÀۈVi «>ÌÌiÀ˜܈Li`iÈ}˜i`̜iˆ“ˆ˜>ÌiV>«>VˆÌއ Žˆˆ˜}Vœ˜yˆVÌÃLiÌÜii˜VœÀÀˆ`œÀð CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 23- 104 - Trillium in Depth Technical Details T …iÀi>Ài“>˜ÞÃÕVViÃÃvՏœ«iÀ>̜ÀÃœv Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ>ÀœÕ˜`̅iܜÀ`]>˜`œÛiÀ `iV>`iÃ̅iÞ…>Ûi`iÛiœ«i`«ÀœÛi˜ ÌiV…˜œœ}ˆiÃ>˜`ÌiV…˜ˆµÕiÃvÀœ“܅ˆV… ̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜V>˜`À>Ü]ÀiVœ}˜ˆâˆ˜}̅i Vœ“«i݈ÌÞœv>`>«Ìˆ˜}>««Àœ>V…iÃ̜œV> VˆÀVՓÃÌ>˜ViÃ>˜`̅iˆ“«œÀÌ>˜ÌܜÀŽ̅>̈Ã>Ài>`Þ ՘`iÀÜ>Þˆ˜̅ˆÃ>Ài>° BRANDING: WHY TRILLIUM? /…i" Ý«>˜Ãˆœ˜«ÀœiVÌ]`iëˆÌiˆÌÃ՘“>ÌV…i` «œÌi˜Ìˆ>̜ÌÀ>˜ÃvœÀ“ÌÀ>Ûi܈̅ˆ˜̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ ,i}ˆœ˜]…>Ïœ˜}v>i˜՘`iÀ̅iÀ>`>Àˆ˜ Vœ“«>ÀˆÃœ˜܈̅“œÀiVœ˜Ûi˜Ìˆœ˜>ÃÕLÜ>Þ>˜` ˆ}…ÌÀ>ˆ«ÀœiVÌð˜«>ÀÌ]̅ˆÃˆÃLiV>ÕÃi̅i" /À>˜ÃˆÌLÀ>˜`ˆÃ>Ài>`ÞÛiÀÞv>“ˆˆ>À̜]>˜`Üi‡ Ài}>À`i`LÞ]Ài}ˆœ˜ÀiÈ`i˜ÌÃ>Ã>Vœ““ÕÌiÀÀ>ˆÜ>Þ° /…iÀ>`ˆV>V…>˜}i̜>Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆœ«iÀ>̈œ˜ˆÃ ȓ«Þ˜œÌV>«ÌÕÀi`LÞ>ÌiÀ“ˆŽi" Ý«>˜Ãˆœ˜° 9œÀŽ,i}ˆœ˜/À>˜ÃˆÌÜ>Ã>Li̜…ˆ}…ˆ}…Ì̅i v՘`>“i˜Ì>V…>˜}i«ÀiÃi˜Ìi`LÞˆÌȘÌÀœ`ÕV̈œ˜ œvLÕÃÀ>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ̅ÀœÕ}…̅i`ˆÃ̈˜VÌLÀ>˜`ˆ˜} œvˆÌà ,/ˆ˜iÃ>ú6ˆÛ>°»/…ˆÃ«>ÌÌiÀ˜…>ÃvœœÜi` ˆ˜ À>“«Ìœ˜܈̅<ؓ]>˜`ˆ˜ ÕÀ…>“,i}ˆœ˜܈̅ *ՏÃi°Ƃ/ÀˆˆÕ“,i}ˆœ˜>,>ˆ iÌܜÀŽŜՏ`…>Ûi >`ˆÃ̈˜VÌLÀ>˜`̜ˆ˜ÃÌ>˜ÌÞVœ˜ÛiÞ̜Àˆ`iÀÃ̅>Ì ̅ˆÃˆÃ>˜i˜ÌˆÀiÞ`ˆvviÀi˜ÌiÛiœvÃiÀۈVivÀœ“ ÌÀ>`ˆÌˆœ˜>"/À>˜ÃˆÌ° œ˜ÃiµÕi˜Ìˆ>Þ]>`ˆÃ̈˜VÌ LÀ>˜`VœÕ`>Ãœ…ˆ}…ˆ}…Ì̅iˆ“«œÀÌ>˜Vi>˜` Û>Õiœv̅iˆ˜ÛiÃ̓i˜Ì°/…i/ÀˆˆÕ“LÀ>˜`“ÕÃÌ }œLiޜ˜`ÌÀ>`ˆÌˆœ˜>LÀ>˜`ˆ˜}°Ƃë>ÀÌœv̅iwÀÃÌ ÃÌi«Ã]̅iLÀ>˜`…>Ã̜ˆ`i˜ÌˆvÞ…œÜˆÌ܈>ÌÌÀ>VÌ >˜`ÀiÌ>ˆ˜VÕÃ̜“iÀð7…>̈ÈÌÃÛ>Õi«Àœ«œÃˆÌˆœ˜¶ 7…>Ì>Ài̅iŽiÞ«>À̘iÀň«ÃœÀÃiÀۈViØiViÃÃ>ÀÞ ̜>ÌÌÀ>VÌÀˆ`iÀö ˆ˜iÃŜՏ`ÀiViˆÛiÃÌ>˜`>À`ˆâi`˜>“iÃ]ÃÕV… >Ã/£]/Ó]iÌViÌiÀ>]“ÕV…ˆŽi̅i/œÀœ˜ÌœÃÕLÜ>Þ° /…iÃiÃÌ>˜`>À`ˆâi`˜>“iÓ>ŽiˆÌi>ÈiÀvœÀÀˆ`iÀÃ̜ ՘`iÀÃÌ>˜`̅iÃiÀۈViÃ]܅ˆiˆ“«ÀœÛˆ˜}>VViÃÈLˆˆÌÞ° -i«>À>ÌiLÀ>˜`ˆ˜}]ÃÕV…>Ã̅ii݈Ã̈˜}"/À>˜ÃˆÌ LÀ>˜`ˆ˜}]VœÕ`LiÕÃi`vœÀœ˜}iÀ‡`ˆÃÌ>˜ViÀi}ˆœ˜> ÃiÀۈVi̜`iÃ̈˜>̈œ˜ÃˆŽiˆÌV…i˜iÀ] ˆ>}>À>]>˜` >ÀÀˆi]̜՘`iÀÃVœÀi̅iˆÀ…ˆ}…iÀëii`]œÜiÀ vÀiµÕi˜VÞ]>˜`ˆ˜VÀi>Ãi`Vœ“vœÀÌ° 24- 105 - SERVICE DESIGN High-Frequency All-day Arrivals and Departures *iœ«i܅œ…>Ûi>V…œˆViÀ>ÀiÞÕÃiÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÃÞÃÌi“Ã܅iÀi ̅iÞ˜ii`̜V…iVŽ>̈“iÌ>Li°,iÃi>ÀV……>ÃŜܘ̅>Ì ̅ivÀiµÕi˜VÞ>Ì܅ˆV…Àˆ`iÀÃV>˜ȓ«ÞÌÕÀ˜‡Õ«‡>˜`‡ }œˆÃ>LœÕÌ£Ó“ˆ˜ÕÌið£x£ä‡“ˆ˜ÕÌivÀiµÕi˜VÞ«ÀœÛˆ`ià ̅iœ««œÀÌ՘ˆÌÞvœÀ>ºVœVŽv>ViÃV…i`Տi]»܅iÀiÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã `i«>ÀÌ>Ì̅iÃ>“ï“iiÛiÀÞ…œÕÀ°ƂÕÃÌÀ>ˆ>˜ÃV…œ>À *>ՏiiÃ…>ÃÀiviÀÀi`̜>º˜iÌܜÀŽivviVÌ»̜iÝ«>ˆ˜ ̅>Ì܅i˜>ÀœÕÌiÃ>ÀiÃÕvwVˆi˜ÌÞvÀiµÕi˜Ì]ˆÌLiVœ“ià «œÃÈLi̜Vœ˜Ûi˜ˆi˜ÌÞ“>ŽiÌÀ>˜ÃviÀÃLiÌÜii˜ÀœÕÌið /…ˆÃ…>Ã>Vœ“«œÕ˜`ˆ˜}«œÃˆÌˆÛiivviVÌœ˜̅iṎˆÌÞœv> ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÃÞÃÌi“°˜ÃÌi>`œvœ˜ÞLiˆ˜}>Li̜Àiˆ>LÞÀi>V… `iÃ̈˜>̈œ˜Ãœ˜̅iˆ˜i̅>Ì…>««i˜Ã̜À՘«>ÃÌ̅iÀˆ`iÀ½Ã œÀˆ}ˆ˜]>˜iÌܜÀŽ̅>Ìv>VˆˆÌ>ÌiÃVœ˜˜iV̈œ˜Ãi˜>LiÃ̅i Àˆ`iÀ̜}œvÀœ“>˜Þ܅iÀi̜>˜Þ܅iÀiˆ˜̅iÀi}ˆœ˜° ,i}ˆœ˜>À>ˆvÀiµÕi˜VˆiȘˆ˜ÌiÀ˜>̈œ˜>«iiÀVˆÌˆiÃÛ>ÀÞ ܈`iÞ]œvÌi˜`Õi̜ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀiVœ˜ÃÌÀ>ˆ˜Ìð՘ˆV…½Ã -‡ >…˜VœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ…>ÛivÀiµÕi˜VˆiÃœvÕ«̜iÛiÀÞÓä “ˆ˜ÕÌiÃ]LÕÌ̅>̈ÃLiV>ÕÃi>ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã“ÕÃÌ«>ÃÃ̅ÀœÕ}…>˜ iÝÌÀi“iÞVœ˜}iÃÌi`Ìܜ‡ÌÀ>VŽÌ՘˜i>VÀœÃÃ̅iVˆÌÞVi˜ÌÀi° ՘ˆV…ˆÃVÕÀÀi˜ÌÞ«>˜˜ˆ˜}>˜iÝ«i˜ÃˆÛi«ÀœiVÌ̜>``> ÃiVœ˜`Ì՘˜iÜ̅>Ì̅iÞV>˜ˆ“«ÀœÛiÃiÀۈVivÀiµÕi˜VÞ >˜`V>«>VˆÌÞ°˜*>ÀˆÃ]̅iVœÀiÃiV̈œ˜Ãœv̅i, ,˜iÌܜÀŽ œ«iÀ>Ìi>ÌvÀiµÕi˜VˆiÃœvÕ«̜iÛiÀÞÌܜ“ˆ˜ÕÌiÃ]LÕÌœ˜ ̅iˆÀœÕÌiÀi˜`Ã]̅iÞ`ˆÛˆ`iˆ˜Ìœ“>˜ÞLÀ>˜V…iÃ܈̅œÜiÀ vÀiµÕi˜VÞ°˜ iÀˆ˜]-‡ >…˜ÀœÕÌiÃ}i˜iÀ>Þœ«iÀ>ÌiiÛiÀÞ £ä̜Ó䓈˜ÕÌiðœ˜`œ˜½Ã ÀœÃÃÀ>ˆ܈œ«iÀ>ÌiÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã iÛiÀÞ̅Àii“ˆ˜ÕÌiÃœ˜ˆÌÃVœÀi`œÕLi‡ÌÀ>VŽÃi}“i˜Ì­Ó°x “ˆ˜ÕÌiÃ`ÕÀˆ˜}̅i«i>Ž®]܈̅œÕÌiÀLÀ>˜V…vÀiµÕi˜Vˆià À>˜}ˆ˜}vÀœ“iÛiÀÞÈÝ“ˆ˜ÕÌiȘ̅ii>ÃÌ]£ä“ˆ˜ÕÌiÃ̜ i>̅ÀœÜƂˆÀ«œÀÌ]>˜`£x“ˆ˜ÕÌiÃ̜>ˆ`i˜…i>`ˆ˜̅i 7iÃÌ°˜}i˜iÀ>]̅i…i>ۈÞLÀ>˜V…i`ÀœÕÌiȘ“>˜Þ ˆ˜ÌiÀ˜>̈œ˜>Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆˆ“«i“i˜Ì>̈œ˜ÃÌi˜`̜Li Vœ˜ÃÌÀ>ˆ˜i`LÞ̅iV>«>VˆÌÞœv̅iˆÀ`œÕLi‡ÌÀ>VŽVi˜ÌÀ> Ãi}“i˜Ìð7ˆÌ…>Ìi˜‡ÌÀ>VŽVi˜ÌÀ>VœÀÀˆ`œÀ]̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ ,i}ˆœ˜…>ØœÃÕV…Vœ˜ÃÌÀ>ˆ˜Ìð >«>VˆÌÞˆ˜VÀi>ÃiÃLÞ “Տ̈«iÃ܈̅vÀiµÕi˜VÞ°ƂVœÀÀˆ`œÀ܈̅>ÌÀ>ˆ˜iÛiÀÞwÛi “ˆ˜ÕÌiÃ…>Ã̅Àiï“iÃ̅iV>«>VˆÌÞœv>VœÀÀˆ`œÀ܈̅> ÌÀ>ˆ˜iÛiÀÞ£x“ˆ˜ÕÌið>݈“ˆâˆ˜}̅ivÀiµÕi˜VÞœvÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã œ˜>ˆ˜i̅ÀœÕ}…œ«iÀ>̈˜}«À>V̈ViÃ>˜`È}˜>ˆ˜}ˆÃ̅i “œÃÌivwVˆi˜ÌÜ>Þ̜ˆ˜VÀi>ÃiV>«>VˆÌÞ° EXPLAINER: CLOCKFACE SCHEDULE ƂVœVŽv>ViÃV…i`ՏiˆÃ> ÃV…i`Տiˆ˜܅ˆV…ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>ÀÀˆÛi >Ì̅iÃ>“ï“iÃiÛiÀÞ…œÕÀ ̅ÀœÕ}…œÕÌ̅i`>Þ°-œ]ˆvÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã >Ì-Ì>̈œ˜8>ÀÀˆÛi>Ìx\£x]x\Îx] >˜`x\xxƂ]̅iÀi܈LiÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã >ÌÈ\£x]È\Îx]È\xxƂ]>˜`Ü œ˜°-œ“i…œÕÀÓ>Þ…>Ûi“œÀi ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̅>˜œÌ…iÀÃ]LÕÌ̅iÃi] ̜œ]V>˜vœœÜ>VœVŽv>Vi «>ÌÌiÀ˜pޜÕ“ˆ}…Ì…>Ûi>ÀÀˆÛ>Ã >ÌÇ\äx]Ç\Óx]>˜`Ç\{xƂ̜ ÃÕ««i“i˜Ì̅i\£x]\Îx>˜`\xx >ÀÀˆÛ>ÃvœÀ̅i“œÀ˜ˆ˜}ÀÕÅ° œVŽv>ViÃV…i`ՏiÃ…>ÛiÌܜ ŽiÞLi˜iwÌÃ\ £° Þȓ«ˆvވ˜}>˜`Ài}Տ>Àˆâˆ˜} ÃV…i`ՏiÃ]̅iÞ“>ŽiÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ “œÀiÕÃiÀ‡vÀˆi˜`Þp˜œ “œÀi“i“œÀˆâˆ˜}Vœ“«iÝ ̈“iÌ>Lið Ó° iÈ}˜ˆ˜}ÃiÀۈViÃ̜vœœÜ ̅iÃ>“i«>ÌÌiÀ˜>`>Þ Ài`ÕViȘvÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi˜ii`ð vޜÕÀÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã“iiÌ>Ì̅iÃ>“i «œˆ˜ÌÃ>˜`ÌiÀ“ˆ˜>Ìiˆ˜̅i Ã>“i«>ÌÌiÀ˜Ã>`>Þ]ޜÕ V>˜Li“œÀiÌ>À}iÌi`ˆ˜ޜÕÀ ˆ˜ÛiÃ̓i˜Ìð CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 25- 106 - 7 8 14 22 25 24 16 15 15 15 15 15 15 23 24 24 15 9 8 8 77 12 19 20 16 12 12 12 12 12 12 15 20 20 20 12 12 12 10 22 10 12 12 12 9 88888 10 12 12 12 12 5 4 20 20 40 60 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 Arrival TimeNumber of TrainsRoute RER A RER B RER D Northbound Trains Arriving at Paris Châtelet-Les Halles Station (7 tracks) by Hour 1 1 3 2 1 1 1 111 1 11 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 111 1 1 1111 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 343 5 5 3 2222 2 3 2 13 5 2 11 2 1 11 1 111 1 12 2 2 111 1 1 4 2 1 4 4 4 4 4 444 4 4 4 4 4 444 4 4 2 4 3 112 1 2 1 3 2 110 20 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 Arrival TimeNumber of TrainsRoute GO Barrie GO Kitchener GO Lakeshore East GO Lakeshore West GO Milton GO Richmond Hill GO Stouffville GO Union Pearson Express VIA Eastbound Trains Toronto Union Station (14 tracks) by Hour Though it has considerably more tracks, Toronto Union Station handles fewer trains than either Châtelet-Les Halles station in Paris or Friedrichstrasse station in Berlin. It is also notable that Union has far less service outside rush hour. 26- 107 - /…iÃi…ˆ}…>˜`Ài}Տ>ÀvÀiµÕi˜VˆiÓi>˜/ÀˆˆÕ“ ܈>VÌ>Ã>>À}iiÝ«>˜Ãˆœ˜œv/œÀœ˜Ìœ½ÃÃÕLÜ>Þ ˜iÌܜÀŽ°1˜ˆŽi̅i// ½ÃÃÕLÜ>ÞÃ]…œÜiÛiÀ]/ÀˆˆÕ“½Ã …ˆ}…vÀiµÕi˜VÞÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã܈ÃÌÀiÌV…v>ÀLiޜ˜`VˆÌޏˆ“ˆÌÃ] iÃÃi˜Ìˆ>ÞVÀi>̈˜}>ÃÕLÜ>Þ˜iÌܜÀŽvœÀ>Ìœ˜]*ii] 9œÀŽ]>˜` ÕÀ…>“Ài}ˆœ˜Ã]>ÃÜi>Ã>“ˆÌœ˜° Ƃ``ˆ˜}V>«>VˆÌÞ>Ì̅i“ˆ``>Þ]iÛi˜ˆ˜}Ã]>˜` ÜiiŽi˜`ÈÃ>Vœ“«>À>̈ÛiL>À}>ˆ˜°6ˆÀÌÕ>Þ>̅i ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi>˜`iµÕˆ«“i˜Ì˜ii`i`̜œ«iÀ>ÌiˆÌ ˆÃ>Ài>`Þ«ÕÀV…>Ãi`̜œ«iÀ>Ìi«i>ŽÃiÀۈVið̈à ȓ«Þ>“>ÌÌiÀœvÕȘ}ˆÌÀ>̅iÀ̅>˜iÌ̈˜}ˆÌÈÌ ˆ`i°/…i“>À}ˆ˜>VœÃ̈Ãȓ«Þ̅i>``ˆÌˆœ˜>…œÕÀà vœÀ̅iœ«iÀ>̈˜}VÀiÜ]>œ˜}܈̅iiVÌÀˆV«œÜiÀvœÀ ̅iÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã°Ƃ``ˆ˜}œvv‡«i>ŽÃiÀۈViˆÃ>Ãœ>Û>Õ>Li Ü>Þ̜>ÌÌÀ>VÌÀˆ`iÀÃ̜i݈Ã̈˜}ÃiÀۈViÃ]ȘVi̅iÞ ܈…>Ûi“œÀiyi݈LˆˆÌÞvœÀ̅iˆÀÀiÌÕÀ˜œÕÀ˜iÞ] ܅ˆV…V>˜…i«`iVœ˜}iÃÌÀÕ҅œÕÀÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã° /…i/ÀˆˆÕ“«>˜«Àœ«œÃiÃ̅ivœœÜˆ˜} vÀiµÕi˜VˆiÃœ˜̅iL>Ãi˜iÌܜÀŽ\ T1­>“ˆÌœ˜̜"Å>Ü>iÝ«ÀiÃî\ iÛiÀޣ䓈˜ÕÌià T2­ ˆ>}>À>̜"Å>Ü>iÝ«ÀiÃî\ iÛiÀÞÎ䓈˜ÕÌià T3­">ŽÛˆi̜*ˆVŽiÀˆ˜}œV>®\ iÛiÀޣ䓈˜ÕÌià T4­ˆÌV…i˜iÀ̜ …iÀÀÞiÝ«ÀiÃî\ iÛiÀÞÓ䓈˜ÕÌià T5­œÕ˜Ì*i>Ã>˜Ì̜ …iÀÀÞiÝ«ÀiÃî\ iÛiÀÞÓ䓈˜ÕÌià T6­*i>Àܘ̜iÀÀ>À`‡ œ˜œV>®\ iÛiÀޣ䓈˜ÕÌiÃÆ«i>ŽÃiÀۈViiÛiÀÞx“ˆ˜ÕÌið -œ“i«i>Ž‡…œÕÀÌÀˆ«Ã̜ÉvÀœ“,ˆV…“œ˜`ˆI T7­ >ÀÀˆiƂ>˜`>i̜ …iÀÀÞiÝ«ÀiÃî\ iÛiÀÞÓ䓈˜ÕÌià T8­ iܓ>ÀŽiÌ̜ …iÀÀޏœV>®\ iÛiÀޣ䓈˜ÕÌià T9­ˆÌœ˜̜ˆ˜Vœ˜ÛˆiœV>®\ iÛiÀޣ䓈˜ÕÌiÃÆ«i>ŽÃiÀۈViiÛiÀÞx“ˆ˜ÕÌið 3 3 3 333333333333333 333 3 1 3 5 666666666666665 333 3 2 2 6666666666666666665 3 2 1 33333333333333333333 0 20 40 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 Arrival TimeNumber of TrainsRoute S3 S5 S7 S9 Westbound Train Arriving at Berlin Friedrichstrasse Station (4 Tracks) by Hour I˜̅iˆ˜ˆÌˆ>/ÀˆˆÕ“«>˜]̅i,ˆV…“œ˜`ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀܜՏ` Ài“>ˆ˜«i>Ž‡œ˜ÞLiޜ˜`̅iÌÕÀ˜>ÀœÕ˜`«œˆ˜Ìˆ˜̅i œ˜ 6>iÞ]LiV>ÕÃiˆÌÃëii`Ã>Àiˆ“ˆÌi`LÞV…>i˜}ˆ˜}VÕÀÛ>ÌÕÀi ˆ˜̅iÛ>iÞ>˜`̅iÀi>ÀiVœ˜yˆVÌÃ܈̅vÀiˆ}…ÌÌÀ>vwVœ˜ˆÌà ˜œÀ̅iÀ˜i˜`° CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 27- 108 - Through-Running /À>`ˆÌˆœ˜>Vœ““ÕÌiÀÀ>ˆÃiÀۈViÃ]ˆŽi"/À>˜ÃˆÌ]}i˜iÀ>Þ…>Ûi VœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ̅>ÌÃÌ>ÀÌœ˜̅iœÕÌiÀi`}iœv̅iÀi}ˆœ˜>˜`i˜`>Ì̅i “>ˆ˜`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜ÃÌ>̈œ˜°/…ˆÃ>««Àœ>V…ܜÀŽÃ>`iµÕ>ÌiÞvœÀ>Ó>iÀ ÃÞÃÌi“]LṎÌÈ}˜ˆwV>˜ÌÞˆ“ˆÌÃV>«>VˆÌÞ°ÌÌ>ŽiÃ̈“ivœÀ>ÌÀ>ˆ˜̜ ÌÕÀ˜>ÀœÕ˜`]`Õi̜̅i˜ii`vœÀœ«iÀ>̜ÀÃ̜Ã܈ÌV…i˜`Ã]>˜`̜ «iÀvœÀ“Ã>viÌÞ“i>ÃÕÀiψŽiLÀ>ŽiV…iVŽÃ°/ˆ“iëi˜ÌÈÌ̈˜}>Ì̅i «>ÌvœÀ“i>ÌÃÕ«ÃV>ÀViV>«>VˆÌÞ>Ì>LÕÃÞÃÌ>̈œ˜ˆŽi1˜ˆœ˜°ÌˆÃ ̅iÀivœÀiv>À“œÀiivwVˆi˜Ì̜ºÌ…ÀœÕ}…À՘»pˆ˜œÌ…iÀܜÀ`Ã]̜«>ˆÀ Õ«VœÀÀˆ`œÀÃVœ“ˆ˜}vÀœ“iˆÌ…iÀÈ`iœv̅iÀi}ˆœ˜]Ü̅>ÌÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃÀ՘ ̅ÀœÕ}…`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜>˜`̅i˜LiÌÕÀ˜i`>Ì̅iœÕÌiÀi`}iœv̅iÀi}ˆœ˜ ܅iÀiÃÌ>̈œ˜V>«>VˆÌÞˆÃVœ“«>À>̈ÛiÞ>L՘`>˜Ì°/…ÀœÕ}…‡À՘˜ˆ˜} >ÃœLÀˆ˜}ÃÈ}˜ˆwV>˜ÌLi˜iwÌÃ̜Àˆ`iÀÃ]“>Žˆ˜}Ș}i‡Ãi>̍œÕÀ˜iÞà «œÃÈLi>VÀœÃÃ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜°ÌV>˜>Ãœi˜>Li>“œÀiiÛi˜`ˆÃÌÀˆLṎœ˜ œvÀˆ`iÀÃ>VÀœÃÃÃiÛiÀ>ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ãˆ˜̅iVˆÌÞVi˜ÌÀi°œÀiÝ>“«i]Àˆ`iÀà Vœ“ˆ˜}vÀœ“̅ii>ÃÌiÀ˜/ƂVœÕ`Àˆ`i«>ÃÌ̅iVÀœÜ`i`«>ÌvœÀ“à >Ì1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜̜>˜œÌ…iÀÃÌ>̈œ˜`œÜ˜̅iˆ˜i]ˆŽi-«>`ˆ˜>]ˆv̅iˆÀ `iÃ̈˜>̈œ˜ÜiÀiœ˜̅iÜiÃÌÈ`iœv`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜° /…ÀœÕ}…‡À՘˜ˆ˜}>Ãœˆ˜VÀi>ÃiÃ̅iivwVˆi˜VÞœvÀ>ˆœ«iÀ>̈œ˜° ƂVœ˜Ûi˜Ìˆœ˜>Vœ““ÕÌiÀÃiÀۈViÃÌ>ÀÌÃ܈̅i“«ÌÞÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>Ì̅i œÕÌiÀi˜`>˜`}À>`Õ>ÞwÃÕ«՘̈̅iÌÀ>ˆ˜Ài>V…iÃ̅i`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜ ÌiÀ“ˆ˜>]>Ì܅ˆV…«œˆ˜ÌˆÌvՏÞi“«ÌˆiÃ]œvÌi˜Vœ˜Ìˆ˜Õˆ˜}œÕÌœvÃiÀۈVi ̜>Ã̜À>}iÞ>À`°Ƃ̅ÀœÕ}…‡À՘˜ˆ˜}ÃiÀۈViV>˜…>Ûi«>ÃÃi˜}iÀà Lœ>À`ˆ˜}>˜`>ˆ}…̈˜}̅ÀœÕ}…œÕÌ̅iÌÀ>ˆ˜½ÃÀœÕÌi]…i«ˆ˜}̜ `iVœ˜}iÃÌ̅iVi˜ÌÀ>ÃÌ>̈œ˜° iV>ÕÃiœvˆÌÃÃiÀۈVi]ivwVˆi˜VÞ]>˜`V>«>VˆÌÞLi˜iwÌÃ]̅ÀœÕ}…‡ À՘˜ˆ˜}ˆÃ>˜>“œÃÌ՘ˆÛiÀÃ>>««Àœ>V…>“œ˜}ܜÀ`‡i>`ˆ˜}Ài}ˆœ˜> À>ˆÃÞÃÌi“Ã]ˆŽi̅œÃiœv*>ÀˆÃ]՘ˆV…] iÀˆ˜]/œŽÞœ]>˜`œ˜`œ˜° WEST >ÀÀˆi ˆÌV…i˜iÀ ˆÌœ˜ >ŽiŜÀi7iÃÌ EAST œ >ÃÌiÀ˜*>ˆÀ­ÌiÀ“ˆ˜>̈˜}`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜® ,ˆV…“œ˜`ˆ­«i>Žœ˜Þ® -̜Õvvۈi >ŽiŜÀi >ÃÌ /…i/ÀˆˆÕ“«>˜«Àœ«œÃiÃ̅ivœœÜˆ˜}Տ̈“>ÌiVœÀÀˆ`œÀ«>ˆÀˆ˜}Ã\ Adding capacity at the midday, evenings, and weekends is a comparative bargain. Virtually all the infrastructure and equipment needed to operate it is already purchased to operate peak services. 28- 109 - Express and Local Service Ý«ÀiÃÃÃiÀۈViˆÃ>ŽiÞ>`Û>˜Ì>}iœvÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆœÛiÀœÌ…iÀ ÌÞ«iÃœvÀ>ˆÀ>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ°7…ˆiˆÌˆÃ}i˜iÀ>Þ˜œÌ˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞœ˜ ŜÀÌÕÀL>˜ÀœÕÌiÃ]܅iÀi“œ`iÀ˜ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>VViiÀ>Ìiv>ÃÌi˜œÕ}… ̜«ÀœÛˆ`iÀi>ܘ>LiÌÀ>Ûi̈“iÃ]ˆÌˆÃÛiÀÞÕÃivՏvœÀœ˜}iÀ‡ `ˆÃÌ>˜ViÀi}ˆœ˜>ÌÀˆ«Ã°˜iÀ“>˜Þ]vœÀiÝ>“«i]̅iÀi>Ài Ãi«>À>ÌiÞLÀ>˜`i`,i}ˆœ Ý«ÀiÃÃÃiÀۈViÃ]܅ˆV…œ«iÀ>Ìi܈̅“œÀi Vœ“vœÀÌ>LiÃi>̈˜}>˜`ˆ“ˆÌi`Ã̜«ÃœÕÌ̜>LœÕÌ£ä䎓vÀœ“̅i VˆÌÞVi˜ÌÀip>“œ`i̅>Ì“>ŽiÃVœ˜Ãˆ`iÀ>LiÃi˜Ãiˆ˜̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ Vœ˜ÌiÝÌvœÀ`iÃ̈˜>̈œ˜ÃˆŽi >ÀÀˆi]ˆÌV…i˜iÀ]>˜` ˆ>}>À>°-œ“i œ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ã]ˆŽi̅i*>ÀˆÃ, ,]ÕÃi>Û>ÀˆiÌÞœvÃiÀۈVi«>ÌÌiÀ˜Ã̅>Ì Έ«ViÀÌ>ˆ˜ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã̜«ÀœÛˆ`i>ψ}…̏Þv>ÃÌiÀÀˆ`i>˜`̜L>>˜Vi œ>`ˆ˜}ð˜>«>˜]…ˆ}…Þ«ÀiVˆÃiÃV…i`Տi>`…iÀi˜Vi“>Žià ˆÌ«œÃÈLi̜À՘˜Õ“iÀœÕÃiÝ«ÀiÃÃ>˜`œV>ÃiÀۈVi«>ÌÌiÀ˜Ã iÛi˜œ˜>Ș}i«>ˆÀœvÌÀ>VŽÃ°˜“œÃÌVˆÌˆiÃ]…œÜiÛiÀ]ÃiÀۈVià «Ài`œ“ˆ˜>˜ÌÞ“>Ži>Ã̜«Ã°/…iÀi>Ài̅ÀiiŽiÞÀi>ܘÃvœÀ̅ˆÃ «À>V̈Vi\iÝ«ÀiÃÃÃiÀۈVi}i˜iÀ>ÞÀiµÕˆÀiÃiÝ«i˜ÃˆÛi>``ˆÌˆœ˜> ÌÀ>VŽˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi̜>œÜÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̜«>ÃÃi>V…œÌ…iÀƈÌV>˜ÀiÃՏÌ ˆ˜՘>VVi«Ì>LÞˆ˜vÀiµÕi˜ÌÃiÀۈVi>̏œV>‡œ˜ÞÃÌ>̈œ˜ÃÆ>˜`ˆÌˆÃ “>`iiÃØiViÃÃ>ÀÞLÞÀ>«ˆ`Þ>VViiÀ>̈˜}iiVÌÀˆV“Տ̈«i‡Õ˜ˆÌ ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̅>ÌV>˜}i˜iÀ>ÞÃ̈«ÀœÛˆ`ï“i‡Vœ“«ï̈ÛiÃiÀۈVi܅ˆi “>Žˆ˜}>Ã̜«Ã]}ˆÛi˜Ài>ܘ>LiÃ̜«ë>Vˆ˜}° iÛiÀ̅iiÃÃ]iÝ«ÀiÃÃÃiÀۈViˆÃ˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞvœÀœ˜}iÀVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ] >˜`ˆÌVœÕ`Liœ«iÀ>Ìi`LÞÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̅>Ì>ÀiwÌÌi`܈̅Ãi>̈˜} LiÌÌiÀÃՈÌi`̜œ˜}iÀÌÀˆ«Ã° /…i/ÀˆˆÕ“«>˜«Àœ«œÃià iÝ«ÀiÃÃÃiÀۈViœ˜̅Àii VœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ]>œv܅ˆV…ÃiÀÛi ŽiÞÀi}ˆœ˜>…ÕLÃ>˜` œ˜}iÀ`ˆÃÌ>˜ViÌÀ>ÛiiÀÃ] >œ˜}܈̅«ÀœÛˆ`ˆ˜}œV> ÃiÀۈVi°/…iÃi>Ài\ • /…i>ŽiŜÀiVœÀÀˆ`œÀ] “>Žˆ˜}ˆ“ˆÌi`Ã̜«Ã LiÌÜii˜">ŽÛˆi>˜` *ˆVŽiÀˆ˜} • /…iˆÌV…i˜iÀVœÀÀˆ`œÀ] “>Žˆ˜}ˆ“ˆÌi`Ã̜«Ã LiÌÜii˜ˆ}…Ü>ÞÓÇ >˜` œœÀ • /…i >ÀÀˆiVœÀÀˆ`œÀ] “>Žˆ˜}ˆ“ˆÌi`Ã̜«Ã LiÌÜii˜ iܓ>ÀŽiÌ >˜`>˜Ã`œÜ˜i‡ œœÀ 29 REGIONAL RAIL FOR THE TORONTO REGION - 110 - iVÌÀˆwi`Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ>˜`…ˆ}…‡Vi>À>˜VivÀiˆ}…ÌÀ>ˆV>˜Vœi݈ÃÌ]>ÃÃii˜ˆ˜̅ˆÃiÝ>“«ivÀœ“*…ˆ>`i«…ˆ>° ROLLING STOCK 'NGEVTKƂECVKQP /…iÀiˆÃ}œœ`Ài>ܘ܅ÞiÛiÀÞÀ>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÃÞÃÌi“ ˆ˜̅iܜÀ`ˆÃœ«iÀ>Ìi`ÕȘ}iiVÌÀˆV«œÜiÀ° iVÌÀˆwV>̈œ˜LÀˆ˜}Ãi˜œÀ“œÕÃ>`Û>˜Ì>}iÃ̜ ÕÀL>˜«>ÃÃi˜}iÀÀ>ˆœ«iÀ>̈œ˜°ˆÀÃÌ>˜`vœÀi“œÃÌ] ˆÌiˆ“ˆ˜>Ìi뜈˜Ìi“ˆÃȜ˜Ãœv«œÕÌ>˜ÌÃ]܅ˆV… V>˜È}˜ˆwV>˜ÌÞ>vviVÌÀiÈ`i˜ÌÃœv˜iˆ}…LœÕÀ…œœ`à >`>Vi˜Ì̜`ˆiÃi‡«œÜiÀi`À>ˆÜ>ޏˆ˜ið˜>«ÀœÛˆ˜Vi ˆŽi"˜Ì>Àˆœ܅iÀi̅iiiVÌÀˆVˆÌÞÃÕ««ÞˆÃ˜i>ÀÞ V>ÀLœ˜‡vÀii]iiVÌÀˆvވ˜}ÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃV>˜…>Ûi“>œÀ«œÃˆÌˆÛi ivviVÌÃœ˜œÛiÀ>}Àii˜…œÕÃi}>Ãi“ˆÃȜ˜Ã°"˜> `ˆiÃiÌÀ>ˆ˜]“œ“i˜ÌՓi˜iÀ}ÞˆÃ`ˆÃÈ«>Ìi`>Ã…i>Ì ܅i˜̅iÌÀ>ˆ˜LÀ>ŽiðƂ˜iiVÌÀˆVÌÀ>ˆ˜V>˜À՘ˆÌà “œÌœÀÃL>VŽÜ>À`>˜`vii`̅>Ìi˜iÀ}ÞL>VŽˆ˜Ìœ ̅i}Àˆ`p>ŽiÞv՘V̈œ˜œ˜ÕÀL>˜ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÀœÕÌiÃ܈̅ vÀiµÕi˜ÌÃ̜«Ã°/…iLÕȘiÃÃV>ÃivœÀiiVÌÀˆwV>̈œ˜ ˆÃvÕÀ̅iÀi˜…>˜Vi`LÞ“>œÀ>`Û>˜ViȘL>ÌÌiÀÞ ÌiV…˜œœ}ÞœÛiÀ̅i«>ÃÌ`iV>`i°ˆ}…‡V>«>VˆÌÞ L>ÌÌiÀˆiÓi>˜̅>̈̈ëœÃÈLi̜œ«iÀ>Ìiܓi ÃiV̈œ˜Ãœv̅iˆ˜i܈̅œÕÌœÛiÀ…i>`܈ÀiÃ]ÃÕV…>à œ˜Ài>̈ÛiÞˆ}…̏ÞÕÃi`ÃiV̈œ˜Ã]ˆ˜Þ>À`Ã]œÀˆ˜>Ài>à ܅iÀi̅iÞܜՏ`՘>VVi«Ì>LÞ>vviVÌvÀiˆ}…ÌÌÀ>vwV° /…iLi˜iwÌÃ>Ài˜œÌÕÃÌi˜ÛˆÀœ˜“i˜Ì>p̅iÀi>Ài i˜œÀ“œÕëÀ>V̈V>Li˜iwÌÃ̜iiVÌÀˆvވ˜}LÕÃÞÀ>ˆÜ>Þ ˆ˜ið7i…>Ûi>LiVœ“iv>“ˆˆ>À܈̅̅i«iÀvœÀ“>˜Vi >`Û>˜Ì>}iÃœviiVÌÀˆVV>ÀÃpÃi`>˜Ã̅>ÌV>˜i>«vÀœ“ ä‡Èäv>ÃÌiÀ̅>˜>iÀÀ>Àˆ°/…i«iÀvœÀ“>˜Vi`ˆvviÀi˜Vi ˆÃÕÃÌ>ÃÀi>܈̅ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>È̈Ã܈̅V>Àð iVÌÀˆVÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã ÀiµÕˆÀi˜œ̈“i̜À>“«Õ«̜vՏ«œÜiÀ]>˜`̅iÞ …>Ûi>˜ivviV̈ÛiÞ՘ˆ“ˆÌi`ÜÕÀViœv«œÜiÀvÀœ“ ̅i«ÀœÛˆ˜Vˆ>}Àˆ`°/…iÞ>Ài>Ãœ“ÕV…ˆ}…ÌiÀ]>Ã̅iÞ `œ˜½Ì…>Տ̅iˆÀ«œÜiÀ«>˜Ì܈̅̅i“iÛiÀÞ܅iÀi̅iÞ }œ°7…i˜ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>Ài“>Žˆ˜}ÛiÀÞvÀiµÕi˜ÌÃ̜«Ãœ˜>˜ ÕÀL>˜À>ˆˆ˜i]>VViiÀ>̈œ˜ˆÃv>À“œÀiˆ“«œÀÌ>˜Ì̅>˜ ̜«ëii`°7ˆÌ…v>ÃÌiÀ>VViiÀ>̈œ˜]>``ˆÌˆœ˜>Ã̜«Ã V>˜Liˆ˜ÌÀœ`ÕVi`p̜«>ViÃÌ>̈œ˜ÃVœÃiÀ̜ÀiÈ`i˜Ìà >˜`ÃiÀÛi˜iÜ>˜`i݈Ã̈˜}`iÛiœ«“i˜ÌÃp܅ˆiÃ̈ Ài`ÕVˆ˜}ÌÀ>Ûi̈“iðƂ"/À>˜ÃˆÌÌÀ>ˆ˜œvLˆiÛiV>Àà …>Ã>«œÜiÀ‡Ìœ‡Üiˆ}…ÌÀ>̈œœvœ˜Þ{°£]Vœ“«>Ài`܈̅ ÓÓ°{vœÀ>ÌÞ«ˆV>iÀ“>˜Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆiiVÌÀˆV“Տ̈«i ՘ˆÌ 1° Ûi˜ˆvÌܜœVœ“œÌˆÛiÃÜiÀiÕÃi`œ˜i>V… ÌÀ>ˆ˜]ˆÌܜՏ`Ã̈…>Ûi>À>̈œœvœ˜ÞÈ°™‡‡iÃÃ̅>˜> ̅ˆÀ`œv̅>Ìœv>iÀ“>˜ 1°/…ˆÃ>VŽœv«œÜiÀ“i>˜Ã ÛiÀÞϜÜ>VViiÀ>̈œ˜]܅ˆV…ˆ˜ÌÕÀ˜“i>˜ÃÀi`ÕVi`ˆ˜i V>«>VˆÌÞ]iëiVˆ>ÞˆvÃÕV…ÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃÜiÀi̜Liœ«iÀ>Ìi`œ˜ ̅iÃ>“iÌÀ>VŽÃ>Ã…ˆ}…‡«iÀvœÀ“>˜Vi 1ðˆŽi}iÌ̈˜} ÃÌÕVŽLi…ˆ˜`>˜œÛiÀœ>`i`ÌÀÕVŽ܅i˜̅iˆ}…ÌÌÕÀ˜Ã }Àii˜]ˆÌÌ>ŽiÃ>œ˜}̈“i̜}iÌÕ«̜ëii`]V>ÕȘ} >ÌÀ>vwV>“Li…ˆ˜`°>ÃÌiÀÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>ÃœÀi`ÕViVœÃÌÃ] ȘVi̅iÞ>œÜvœÀ̅iÃ>“i˜Õ“LiÀœvÃiÀۈViÃ̜Li œ«iÀ>Ìi`܈̅viÜiÀÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã° 30- 111 - iVÌÀˆwV>̈œ˜“ÕÃÌLi`iÈ}˜i`ˆ˜>Ü>Þ̅>Ì ˆÃVœ“«>̈Li܈̅iµÕ>Þˆ“«œÀÌ>˜ÌvÀiˆ}…ÌÀ>ˆ œ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ã̅ÀœÕ}…œÕÌ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜]«>À̈VՏ>ÀÞœ˜ ŽiÞvÀiˆ}…ÌVœÀÀˆ`œÀð,>ˆœ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ãˆ˜̅i iÜ9œÀŽ >˜`*…ˆ>`i«…ˆ>>Ài>Ã…>ÛiŜܘ̅>Ì«>ÃÃi˜}iÀ ÃiÀۈViÃÕȘ}œÛiÀ…i>`V>Ìi˜>ÀÞÃÞÃÌi“ÃV>˜Li vՏÞVœ“«>̈Li܈̅vÀiµÕi˜ÌvÀiˆ}…ÌÃiÀۈViÃp iÛi˜܈̅…ˆ}…Vi>À>˜Vi`œÕLi‡ÃÌ>VŽÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã°Ƃ˜Þ ˆ“«i“i˜Ì>̈œ˜œviiVÌÀˆwV>̈œ˜œ˜“>œÀvÀiˆ}…Ì VœÀÀˆ`œÀÓÕÃÌ>Ãœi˜ÃÕÀiâiÀœˆ˜ÌiÀviÀi˜Vi܈̅ vÀiˆ}…ÌÀ>ˆÜ>ÞÈ}˜>ˆ˜}ÃÞÃÌi“ðv«œÃÈLi] Ãi«>À>ÌiÌÀ>VŽÃŜՏ`Li`i`ˆV>Ìi`̜vÀiˆ}…Ì >˜`Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÃiÀۈVi]i˜ÃÕÀˆ˜}̅>Ì«>ÃÃi˜}iÀ Õ«}À>`iÃ`œ˜œÌˆ˜>˜ÞÜ>Þˆ“«i`i}œœ`à “œÛi“i˜Ì°v˜iˆÌ…iÀÃi«>À>̈œ˜˜œÀ“ˆÝi`‡ÌÀ>vwV iiVÌÀˆwV>̈œ˜ˆÃ«œÃÈLi]̅i«ÀœVÕÀi“i˜ÌœvL>ÌÌiÀÞ œÀ`Õ>‡“œ`i­iiVÌÀˆV>˜``ˆiÃi‡iiVÌÀˆV®“Տ̈«i ՘ˆÌÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃŜՏ`Liˆ˜ÛiÃ̈}>Ìi`° Ո`ˆ˜}vÀœ“̅iÃi«Àˆ˜Vˆ«iÃ]̅i/ÀˆˆÕ“«>˜ «Àœ«œÃiÃiiVÌÀˆwV>̈œ˜œv̅ivœœÜˆ˜}VœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ\ • /…i>ŽiŜÀiVœÀÀˆ`œÀ]vÀœ“>“ˆÌœ˜̜"Å>Ü> • /…iˆÌV…i˜iÀVœÀÀˆ`œÀ]vÀœ“ˆÌV…i˜iÀ̜1˜ˆœ˜ -Ì>̈œ˜­i˜ÃÕÀˆ˜}̅>ÌiiVÌÀˆwV>̈œ˜V>˜Li“>`i Vœ“«>̈Li܈̅ vÀiˆ}…ÌÃiÀۈViÃLiÌÜii˜ iœÀ}i̜ܘ>˜` À>“>i>® • /…iˆÌœ˜ œÀÀˆ`œÀ]vÀœ“ˆÌœ˜̜1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜ ­ˆvˆÌV>˜Liˆ“«i“i˜Ìi`ˆ˜>Ü>Þ̅>Ì`œiØœÌ Vœ˜yˆVÌ܈̅ *vÀiˆ}…Ìœ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ã® • /…i >ÀÀˆiVœÀÀˆ`œÀ]vÀœ“ >ÀÀˆi̜1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜ • /…i-̜ÕvvۈiVœÀÀˆ`œÀ]vÀœ“ˆ˜Vœ˜Ûˆi̜ -V>ÀLœÀœÕ}… iV>ÕÃiœvœÜ«Àœ«œÃi`ÃiÀۈViiÛiÃ>˜`vÀiˆ}…Ì ˆ˜ÌiÀ>V̈œ˜Ã]iiVÌÀˆwV>̈œ˜ˆÃ˜œÌ«Àœ«œÃi`œ˜̅i Õ««iÀ,ˆV…“œ˜`ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀ]œÀœ˜̅i ˆ>}>À>LÀ>˜V… œv̅i>ŽiŜÀiVœÀÀˆ`œÀ° Modern Multiple-Unit Trains iVÌÀˆwV>̈œ˜ˆÃ˜œÌ̅iœ˜Þˆ“«œÀÌ>˜Ìii“i˜ÌvœÀ ˆ“«ÀœÛˆ˜}>VViiÀ>̈œ˜«iÀvœÀ“>˜Vi°ÕÃÌ>Ã>ÃÕLÜ>Þ ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>ÀœÕ˜`̅iܜÀ`>ÀiiiVÌÀˆV]̅iÞ>Ài>Ãœ> “Տ̈«i՘ˆÌð/…ˆÃ“i>˜Ã̅>ÌÀ>̅iÀ̅>˜…>ۈ˜}> œVœ“œÌˆÛi«Õň˜}>˜`«Õˆ˜}՘«œÜiÀi`V>ÀÃ]>Ã" `œiÃ̜`>Þ]̅iÞ…>ÛiiiVÌÀˆV“œÌœÀȘi>V…V>À]Ü̅i ܅œii˜}̅œv̅iÌÀ>ˆ˜ˆÃ«œÜiÀi`]ÕÃ̏ˆŽi>ÃÕLÜ>Þ ÌÀ>ˆ˜°/…ˆÃˆÃˆ“«œÀÌ>˜ÌLiV>ÕÃiÌÀ>VŽ>`…iȜ˜ˆÃœvÌi˜ ̅iˆ“ˆÌˆ˜}v>V̜ÀvœÀ>VViiÀ>̈œ˜vÀœ“>Ã̜«]À>̅iÀ ̅>˜«œÜiÀ°/À>ˆ˜Ã>ÀiÜivwVˆi˜ÌLiV>ÕÃi̅iÀiˆÃÛiÀÞ ˆÌ̏ivÀˆV̈œ˜LiÌÜii˜>ÃÌii܅ii>˜`ÃÌiiÀ>ˆ°7…i˜ ÃÌ>À̈˜}vÀœ“>Ã̜«]…œÜiÛiÀ]̅ˆÃ>VŽœvvÀˆV̈œ˜V>˜Li >«ÀœLi“pÕÃ̏ˆŽiL>`̈ÀiÃœ˜>V>À° œ“>ÌÌiÀ…œÜ Lˆ}̅ii˜}ˆ˜i“>ÞLi]œÀ…œÜ“ÕV…ޜÕÃ̜“«œ˜̅i }>Ã]̅iV>À܈˜œÌ“œÛiˆv̅i܅iiÃ>Àiψ««ˆ˜}° Ƃ“Տ̈«i‡Õ˜ˆÌëÀi>`Ã̅>Ì«œÜiÀ>VÀœÃÃ̅ii˜}̅ œv̅iÌÀ>ˆ˜pˆ˜ÃÌi>`œv>…>˜`vՏœv«œÜiÀi`>ݏiÃ] ̅iÀiV>˜Li`œâi˜Ã°œÀ>Ài}ˆœ˜>ÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃÌ>À̈˜}vÀœ“ >Ã̜«iÛiÀÞVœÕ«iœv“ˆ˜ÕÌiÃ]̅ï“iÃ>ۈ˜}ÃvÀœ“ Liˆ˜}>Li̜µÕˆVŽÞ>VViiÀ>Ìi>``Õ«>˜`ŜÀÌi˜ ÌÀˆ«ÃvœÀ«>ÃÃi˜}iÀð/…ˆÃˆÃ̅iÀi>ܘœVœ“œÌˆÛi‡ …>Տi`ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>ÀiۈÀÌÕ>Þ՘…i>À`œvˆ˜vÀiµÕi˜ÌÕÀL>˜ À>ˆœ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ãˆ˜“>œÀVˆÌˆiψŽi*>ÀˆÃ] iÀˆ˜]-Þ`˜iÞ] /œŽÞœ]>˜`œ˜`œ˜°*ÕÀV…>Ș}“œ`iÀ˜ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ãœvv‡Ì…i‡ ÅivV>˜«ÀœÛˆ`iÃÕLÃÌ>˜Ìˆ>Ã>ۈ˜}Ã]>˜`ȘVi̅iÞ>Ài }i˜iÀ>Þ`iÈ}˜i`vœÀˆ˜ÌiÀœ«iÀ>LˆˆÌÞ]ˆÌܜՏ`“i>˜ ̅>Ì/ÀˆˆÕ“ˆÃ˜œÌœVŽi`ˆ˜Ìœ>Ș}iÛi˜`œÀ° œ`iÀ˜ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>Ài>Ãœ“ÕV…ˆ}…ÌiÀ̅>˜̅i ÌÀ>`ˆÌˆœ˜> œÀ̅Ƃ“iÀˆV>˜ÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃVÕÀÀi˜ÌÞÕÃi`LÞ "/À>˜ÃˆÌ°"ÛiÀ̅i«>ÃÌ`iV>`iÃ]>Õ̜“œLˆiÃ…>Ûi LiVœ“iˆ}…ÌiÀ]>˜`̅iÀivœÀi“œÀivÕi‡ivwVˆi˜Ì] œÜˆ˜}̜˜iÜÌiV…˜œœ}ˆiÃ̅>̘iÛiÀ̅iiÃÓ>Ži ̅i“Vœ˜Ãˆ`iÀ>LÞÃ>viÀˆ˜VÀ>Åið7…ˆi̅iÃiŽˆ˜`à œvÌiV…˜œœ}ˆiÃ…>ÛiLii˜ˆ“«i“i˜Ìi`œ˜ ÕÀœ«i>˜ >˜`ƂÈ>˜ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã] œÀ̅Ƃ“iÀˆV>˜ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ãp̅>˜ŽÃˆ˜«>ÀÌ ̜`>Ìi`Ài}Տ>̈œ˜ÃpVœ˜Ìˆ˜Õi̜LiLՈÌˆŽi>£™xäà -ÌÕ`iL>ŽiÀ]܈̅…i>ÛÞÜiˆ}…Ì>Ã̅i«Àˆ“>ÀÞ“i>˜Ãœv A GO Transit train of bilevel cars has a power to weight ratio of only 4.1, compared with 22.4 for a typical German regional rail EMU. This lack of power means very slow acceleration, which in turn means reduced line capacity, especially if such trains were to be operated on the same tracks as high-performance EMUs. CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 31- 112 - VÀ>Å«ÀœÌiV̈œ˜°ˆ}…ÌiÀÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃÀi`ÕViˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀiÜi>À >˜`̅iVœÃÌœvˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀiVœ˜ÃÌÀÕV̈œ˜]ˆ˜>``ˆÌˆœ˜̜ Liˆ˜}“œÀii˜iÀ}އivwVˆi˜Ì>˜`…ˆ}…‡«iÀvœÀ“ˆ˜}° >Ã̇>VViiÀ>̈˜}iiVÌÀˆVÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>ÃœÀi`ÕViVœÃÌà vœÀÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ>}i˜VˆiÃLiV>ÕÃiϜÜ>VViiÀ>̈œ˜ˆ“ˆÌà V>«>VˆÌÞœ˜>ˆ˜i]Ài`ÕVˆ˜}̅iṎˆâ>̈œ˜œviÝ«i˜ÃˆÛi ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi°/…iÞV>˜>ÃœLi돈Ì>˜`œˆ˜i` i>ȏÞ]Ü̅>ÌÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃV>˜LiŜÀÌi˜i`œvv‡«i>Ž̜ “>ÌV…`i“>˜`]>˜`̅i՘˜ii`i`ÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃV>˜ÀiViˆÛi “>ˆ˜Ìi˜>˜Vi]Ài`ÕVˆ˜}̜Ì>yiiÌÀiµÕˆÀi“i˜Ìð ˜VÀi>Ș}Þ]Ài}Տ>̜ÀȘLœÌ… >˜>`>>˜`̅i 1˜ˆÌi`-Ì>ÌiÃ…>ÛiÀi>Ýi`>˜`}À>˜Ìi`Ü>ˆÛiÀÃ̜ ̅iÃiÀi}Տ>̈œ˜Ã]ÀiVœ}˜ˆâˆ˜}̅>Ì>`Û>˜Vi`È}˜>ˆ˜} >˜`“œ`iÀ˜Ã>viÌÞÃÞÃÌi“Ã}Ài>̏ÞÀi`ÕVi̅iÀˆÃŽœv VœˆÃˆœ˜Ã° >ÌÀ>ˆ˜]vœÀiÝ>“«i]ˆÃ>VµÕˆÀˆ˜}œvv‡Ì…i‡ Åiv ÕÀœ«i>˜ 1ÃvœÀ̅iˆÀÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÕ«}À>`i° ̈Ãv>ÀV…i>«iÀ̜LÕÞLiÌÌiÀ‡«iÀvœÀ“ˆ˜}ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã­Ü…ˆV… >Ãœ>Ã̏œ˜}iÀ>˜`ÀiµÕˆÀiiÃÓ>ˆ˜Ìi˜>˜Vi̅>˜ `ˆiÃiÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã®̅>˜̜LՈ`˜iÜÌÀ>VŽÃ°/…iÃi«ÀœLi“à >ÀiVœ“«œÕ˜`i`܅i˜`i>ˆ˜}܈̅“ˆÝi`yiiÌð ÕÃÌ>Ã>LÕÃÞ…ˆ}…Ü>Þ`iÛiœ«Ã>ÌÀ>vwV>“܅i˜ œ˜iÛi…ˆViˆÃ“œÛˆ˜}“ÕV…“œÀiϜ܏Þ̅>˜œÌ…iÀÃ] ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã܈̅`ˆvviÀi˜Ì«iÀvœÀ“>˜ViÃÌ>˜`>À`Ãi˜`Õ« L՘V…ˆ˜}>˜`̅iÀivœÀiÀi`ÕVˆ˜}V>«>VˆÌÞœ˜̅iˆ˜i° /œ“>݈“ˆâi̅iÛ>Õiœvˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi]ˆÌˆÃLiÃÌ̜ iÝVÕÈÛiÞœ«iÀ>ÌiÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã܈̅ÛiÀÞȓˆ>À«iÀvœÀ“>˜Vi V…>À>VÌiÀˆÃ̈VÃœ˜>}ˆÛi˜ˆ˜i°/…ˆÃ˜œÌœ˜Þ“i>˜Ã Vœ˜ÛiÀ̈˜}>ÓÕV…œv̅iÃÞÃÌi“>ÈëœÃÈLi̜ iiVÌÀˆwi`“Տ̈«i‡Õ˜ˆÌœ«iÀ>̈œ˜]LÕÌ>Ãœˆ˜ÛiÃ̈˜}ˆ˜ L>ÌÌiÀÞ]`ˆiÃiœÀLˆ‡“œ`>“Տ̈«i՘ˆÌÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã­Ãˆ“ˆ>À ̜̅œÃiÕÃi`̜`>Þœ˜1˜ˆœ˜*i>Àܘ Ý«ÀiÃÃÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã® vœÀVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ܅ˆV…܈˜œÌˆ““i`ˆ>ÌiÞLiiiVÌÀˆwi`° œ˜Ìˆ˜Õˆ˜}̜ÕÃii}>VޏœVœ“œÌˆÛi‡…>Տi` iµÕˆ«“i˜Ìœ˜̅iÃi`ˆiÃiÃi}“i˜ÌÓ>ÞÃ>Ûi“œ˜iÞ ˆ˜yiiÌ«ÀœVÕÀi“i˜Ì]LÕÌ܈ˆŽiÞi˜`Õ«VœÃ̈˜} “ÕV…“œÀi̅>˜̅>̈˜ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi]>ÏœVœ“œÌˆÛi‡ …>Տi`ÃiÌýϜÜ>VViiÀ>̈œ˜Ài`ÕViψ˜iV>«>VˆÌÞ >˜`ÀiµÕˆÀiÃ}À>`iÃ̅>Ì>ÀiiÃÃÃÌii«° "/À>˜ÃˆÌ½ÃV>«ˆÌ>LÕ`}iÌvœÀˆÌÃiÝ«>˜Ãˆœ˜«ÀœiVÌ ˆÃˆ˜iÝViÃÃœvf£Ó°ÓLˆˆœ˜°/…iVœÃÌœvÀi«>Vˆ˜} ̅ii˜ÌˆÀi"yiiÌ܈̅iµÕˆÛ>i˜ÌV>«>VˆÌÞˆ˜ 1Ã]L>Ãi`œ˜>ÀiVi˜ÌiÀ“>˜œÀ`iÀ]ˆÃ>LœÕÌ f{°ÓLˆˆœ˜pÜi܈̅ˆ˜̅i«ÀœiVÌLÕ`}iÌ܅ˆi Ài`ÕVˆ˜}̅iVœÃÌœvœÌ…iÀ«ÀœiVÌii“i˜ÌÃ>˜` }Ài>̏Þˆ“«ÀœÛˆ˜}«iÀvœÀ“>˜Vi°-œ“iœv̅iLˆiÛi yiiÌ܈ܜ˜˜ii`̜LiÀi«>Vi`ˆ˜>˜ÞV>Ãi]܅ˆi œÌ…iÀV>ÀÃVœÕ`Li܏`œÀÀi«ÕÀ«œÃi`vœÀœ˜}iÀ‡ `ˆÃÌ>˜ViÃiÀۈVið /…iLi˜iwÌÃvÀœ“>՘ˆvœÀ“] …ˆ}…‡«iÀvœÀ“>˜ViyiiÌLՈÌ̜>Ș}iÃÌ>˜`>À` vœÀ«>ÌvœÀ“…iˆ}…Ì>˜`œÌ…iÀV…>À>VÌiÀˆÃ̈VÃv>À œÕÌÜiˆ}…̅iLi˜iwÌÃœvÃÌÀiÌV…ˆ˜}>viÜiÝÌÀ>Þi>Àà œÕÌœv"/À>˜ÃˆÌ½Ãi}>VÞyiiÌ°/…iœ˜}>˜`«…>Ãi` ˆ“«i“i˜Ì>̈œ˜«iÀˆœ`̅>Ì܈Li˜ii`i`vœÀÀi}ˆœ˜> À>ˆ̜LiiÝÌi˜`i`>VÀœÃÃ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜܈}ˆÛi“>˜Þ “œÀiÞi>ÀÃœvÃiÀۈVi̜̅iLˆiÛiyiiÌ° Faster Loading and Unloading ƂÃÜi܈Ãii]̅i«Àˆ“>ÀÞVœ˜ÃÌÀ>ˆ˜Ìœ˜"/À>˜ÃˆÌ½Ã V>«>VˆÌÞˆÃ1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜]܅iÀiˆÌÌ>ŽiÃ>œ˜}̈“i vœÀ«>ÃÃi˜}iÀÃ̜Lœ>À`>˜``ˆÃi“L>ÀŽvÀœ“vՏ ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã°7…ˆi«>ÀÌœv̅iˆÃÃÕiˆiȘ̅i`iÈ}˜œv̅i ÃÌ>̈œ˜ˆÌÃiv]>˜œÌ…iÀŽiÞ«ÀœLi“ˆÃ̅iÌÀ>ˆ˜V>Àð ƂVœ“«>ÀˆÃœ˜܈̅̅iÃÕLÜ>ވȘÃÌÀÕV̈Ûi\iÛi˜>Ì ̅iVÀœÜ`i` œœÀ‡9œ˜}iÃÌ>̈œ˜]ˆÌÌ>ŽiÃ>“>ÌÌiÀ œvÃiVœ˜`ÃvœÀ>ÌÀ>ˆ˜̜œ>`>˜`՘œ>`°ƂÌ1˜ˆœ˜ -Ì>̈œ˜]>"/À>ˆ˜V>˜Ì>ŽiÃiÛiÀ>“ˆ˜ÕÌiÃ̜`œ̅i Ã>“i̅ˆ˜}°/…>Ì“i>˜Ã̅>Ì̅iÌÀ>VŽˆÃœVVÕ«ˆi`]>˜` ̅ivœœÜˆ˜}ÌÀ>ˆ˜“ÕÃÌÜ>ˆÌ° i>ÀÞ]ˆvˆÌ̜œŽ“ˆ˜ÕÌià ̜œ>`>˜`՘œ>`>Ì œœÀ‡9œ˜}i]̅iÃÕLÜ>ÞܜՏ` µÕˆVŽÞ}Àˆ˜`̜>…>Ì°7…>̽Ã̅i`ˆvviÀi˜Vi¶ƂȘ}i /œÀœ˜ÌœÃÕLÜ>ÞV>ÀˆÃÓΓiÌÀiÏœ˜}]Vœ“«>Ài`̜ÓÈ “iÌÀiÃvœÀ>"LˆiÛiV>À°œÜiÛiÀ]ˆÌ…>ÃvœÕÀ`œœÀà œ˜i>V…È`i]Vœ“«>Ài`̜œ˜ÞÌܜœ˜̅i"LˆiÛi° ÕÀ̅iÀ“œÀi]̅i"V>À…>ÃÌܜiÛiÃ]“>Žˆ˜}vœÀ >˜iÝÌÀi“iÞ…ˆ}…À>̈œœv«>ÃÃi˜}iÀÃ̜`œœÀÃ>˜` >``ˆ˜}>˜>``ˆÌˆœ˜>V…œŽi«œˆ˜Ì>Ìi>V…V>À½Ã˜>ÀÀœÜ ˆ˜ÌiÀˆœÀÃÌ>ˆÀð"̅iÀVˆÌˆiÃ]ÃÕV…>Ã-Þ`˜iÞ>˜`*>ÀˆÃ] >ÃœÕÃi`œÕLi‡`iVŽiÀÌÀ>ˆ˜Ãˆ˜̅iˆÀÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ ˜iÌܜÀŽÃ°œÜiÛiÀ]"ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã…>ÛiviÜiÀ>˜`˜>ÀÀœÜiÀ `œœÀÃ̅>˜̅iÌÀ>ˆ˜Ãˆ˜̅iÃiœÌ…iÀÃÞÃÌi“ð iÛiLœ>À`ˆ˜}ˆÃ>ÃœVÀˆÌˆV>̜v>Ã̏œ>`ˆ˜}>˜` ՘œ>`ˆ˜}>ÌÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã°7…i˜«>ÃÃi˜}iÀÃ…>Ûi̜Ì>Ži >ÃÌi«`œÜ˜vÀœ“>ÌÀ>ˆ˜]̅iÞϜÜ`œÜ˜°/…ˆÃˆÃ>˜ iëiVˆ>ÞÃiÀˆœÕÈÃÃÕivœÀv>“ˆˆiÃ܈̅Ó>V…ˆ`Ài˜] ̅ii`iÀÞ]>˜`«iœ«i܈̅`ˆÃ>LˆˆÌˆið̏ˆ“ˆÌÃ>VViÃà vœÀ܅iiV…>ˆÀÕÃiÀÃ]܅œܜՏ`ÀiµÕˆÀi>ÃÈÃÌ>˜Vi vÀœ“ÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃÌ>vv° ˆ}…«>ÌvœÀ“í>ÃÃՓˆ˜}ÃÕvwVˆi˜Ì«>ÌvœÀ“܈`̅® >Ãœ>œÜÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̜Ã>viÞi˜ÌiÀÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã>ÌvՏëii`] È}˜ˆwV>˜ÌÞÀi`ÕVˆ˜}œÕÀ˜iÞ̈“iÃ>˜`ˆ˜VÀi>Ș} ˆ˜iV>«>VˆÌÞ°>˜Þ ÕÀœ«i>˜À>ˆÜ>ÞÃ>Ài}i˜iÀ>Þ ÃÌ>˜`>À`ˆâˆ˜}œ˜>«>ÌvœÀ“…iˆ}…ÌœvxxV“]܅ˆV… >œÜÃvœÀiÛiLœ>À`ˆ˜}܈̅>“œ`iÀ˜ÌÀ>ˆ˜“œ`iÃ° /…œÕ}…ÃÕV…œÜyœœÀÃVœ“i>Ìܓi`ˆÃ>`Û>˜Ì>}iÃ] 32- 113 - ˆÌi˜>LiÃÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̜Ã̈ÃiÀÛiÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã܈̅œÜ«>ÌvœÀ“Ã܅iÀi«>ÃÃi˜}iÀà ܜՏ`ȓ«ÞÃÌi«Õ«°"/À>˜ÃˆÌ½Ãi݈Ã̈˜}LˆiÛiÃ…>Ûi>ÈΰxV“yœœÀ …iˆ}…Ì°/…>̈Øœ˜‡ÃÌ>˜`>À`]LṎÌܜՏ`˜œÌLi>«ÀœLi“vœÀ“œ`iÀ˜ ÕÀœ«i>˜ 1Ã̜LiLՈÌ̜̅>ÌyœœÀ…iˆ}…Ì]i˜>Lˆ˜}iÛiLœ>À`ˆ˜}vœÀ LœÌ…i݈Ã̈˜}LˆiÛiÃ>˜`˜iÜ 1Ã>Ì̅iÃ>“i«>ÌvœÀ“ð Ƃ`iVˆÃˆœ˜œ˜«>ÌvœÀ“…iˆ}…ÌL>Ãi`œ˜Àœˆ˜}Ã̜VŽ`iÈ}˜˜ii`Ã̜ LiÌ>Ži˜>Ì̅iœÕÌÃiÌÜ̅>̈̈ëœÃÈLi̜`iÛiœ«>Vœ“«Ài…i˜ÃˆÛi ÃÌÀ>Ìi}ÞvœÀÀ>ˆÃˆ˜}«>ÌvœÀ“ð-œ“iÃÞÃÌi“Ã…>ÛiÜÕ}…Ì̜Ì>Ži>«…>Ãi` >««Àœ>V…̜À>ˆÃˆ˜}«>ÌvœÀ“ÃpˆŽi*…ˆ>`i«…ˆ>½Ã- */Ƃ,i}ˆœ˜>,>ˆ œÀ̅i->˜À>˜VˆÃVœ >ÞƂÀi>½Ã >ÌÀ>ˆ˜°>˜Þ ÕÀœ«i>˜ÃÞÃÌi“Ã>Ài ÃÌ>˜`>À`ˆâˆ˜}œ˜>«>ÌvœÀ“…iˆ}…ÌœvxxV“]܅ˆV…ˆÃœÜi˜œÕ}…̜Ã̈ >œÜÀˆ`iÀÃ̜ÃÌi«Õ«vÀœ“i݈Ã̈˜}œÜ«>ÌvœÀ“ðÌ“>Þ>ÃœLi«œÃÈLi ̜ÃÌ>˜`>À`ˆâiœ˜̅ii݈Ã̈˜}LˆiÛi«>ÌvœÀ“…iˆ}…Ì]>œÜˆ˜}LœÌ… LˆiÛiÃ>˜`˜iÜ 1Ã̜…>ÛiiÛiLœ>À`ˆ˜}vÀœ“̅iÃ>“i«>ÌvœÀ“° /…i1* Ý«ÀiÃëÀœiVÌ`i“œ˜ÃÌÀ>ÌiÃ̅ivi>ÈLˆˆÌÞœvLՈ`ˆ˜}…ˆ}… «>ÌvœÀ“Ãœ˜>VœÀÀˆ`œÀ̅>̈Ș>V̈ÛiÕÃi°/…iÀi>Ài˜Õ“iÀœÕÃiÝ>“«ià œvÃÕVViÃÃvՏ˜iÌܜÀŽ‡Üˆ`i«>ÌvœÀ“…iˆ}…Ì>`ÕÃ̓i˜ÌÃ]ÃÕV…>Ã̅i ÀÕÃÃiÃ, ,«ÀœiVÌ° œÕ˜ÌiÀˆ˜ÌՈ̈ÛiÞ]ÕȘ}V>ÀÃ܈̅iÃÃV>«>VˆÌÞV>˜ˆ˜VÀi>ÃiœÛiÀ>ˆ˜i V>«>VˆÌÞˆvˆÌ“i>˜Ã«>ÃÃi˜}iÀÃV>˜Lœ>À`>˜`>ˆ}…Ì“œÀiµÕˆVŽÞ]>˜` ̅iÀivœÀiÌÀ>ˆ˜Ãܜ˜½Ì˜ii`̜`ÜiÜœ˜}>ÌÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã°Ƃ"LˆiÛiV>À …>Ã>LœÕÌn䯓œÀiV>«>VˆÌÞ̅>˜>/œÀœ˜Ìœ,œVŽiÌÃÕLÜ>ÞV>À]܅ˆV…ˆÃ È}˜ˆwV>˜Ì° Ṏv>ÃÕLÜ>އÃÌޏiÌÀ>ˆ˜V>˜À՘iÛiÀÞÓ°x“ˆ˜ÕÌiÃ܅ˆi̅i "ÌÀ>ˆ˜V>˜œ˜ÞÀ՘iÛiÀÞÌi˜“ˆ˜ÕÌiÃLiV>ÕÃiœvœ˜}ÃÌ>̈œ˜`ÜiÃ] ̅iÃÕLÜ>ÞÀi>ˆâiÃ>Îä䯈˜VÀi>Ãiˆ˜ÌÀ>ˆ˜̅ÀœÕ}…«ÕÌ° Ûi˜Ì>Žˆ˜}ˆ˜Ìœ >VVœÕ˜Ì̅iÓ>iÀ˜Õ“LiÀœv«iœ«i܅œV>˜wÌœ˜>ÃÕLÜ>ÞV>À]̅>̽ÃÃ̈ “œÀi̅>˜Ì܈Vi>ÓÕV…œÛiÀ>ˆ˜iV>«>VˆÌÞ°ƂÌÞ«ˆV> ÕÀœ«i>˜Ș}i‡ iÛi 1]ˆŽi̅i˜iÜ >ÃÃ{™äÌÀ>ˆ˜Ãœv̅i>“LÕÀ}-‡ >…˜]ܜՏ`…>Ûi The primary constraint on GO Transit’s capacity is Union Station, where it takes a long time for passengers to board and disembark from full trains. While part of the issue lies in the design of the station itself, another key problem is the train cars. ÝÌÀ>‡Üˆ`i`œœÀÃœ˜-Þ`˜i޽ØiÜ7>À>Ì>…ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>œÜvœÀµÕˆVŽœ>`ˆ˜}>˜`՘œ>`ˆ˜}]܅ˆV…ˆ˜VÀi>ÃiÃV>«>VˆÌÞ° 33- 114 - >ˆÌ̏i“œÀi̅>˜…>v>Ó>˜ÞÃi>ÌÃ>Ã>"ÌÀ>ˆ˜œv̅iÃ>“ii˜}̅­Ì…œÕ}… ̅i`ˆvviÀi˜Viˆ˜VÕ`ˆ˜}ÃÌ>˜`ˆ˜}Àˆ`iÀÈÃÓ>iÀ®°/…>Ì“i>˜Ã̅>Ì`œÕLˆ˜} vÀiµÕi˜VÞܜՏ`iÝVii`i݈Ã̈˜}V>«>VˆÌÞpܓi̅ˆ˜}̅>̈Ãi>ȏÞ>V…ˆiÛ>Li ܈̅̅iv>À…ˆ}…iÀ«iÀvœÀ“>˜Vi]>˜`v>ÃÌiÀœ>`ˆ˜}>˜`՘œ>`ˆ˜}] œvȘ}i‡iÛi 1ð Global Best Practice in Rolling Stock *>Vˆ˜}̅iÃiii“i˜ÌÃœvyiiÌÃÌÀ>Ìi}Þ̜}i̅iÀˆ˜>Ü>Þ̅>ÌÃÕ««œÀÌà “œ`iÀ˜ˆâi`œ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ãˆ˜̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜«œˆ˜ÌÃÕÃ̜Ü>À`Ã>yiiÌۈȜ˜ Vi˜ÌÀi`>ÀœÕ˜`>՘ˆvœÀ“}ÀœÕ«œv…ˆ}…‡«iÀvœÀ“>˜ViiiVÌÀˆV“Տ̈«i՘ˆÌð ƂÀœÕ˜`̅iܜÀ`]̅ˆÃˆÃ̅i˜œÀ“]܈̅œ«iÀ>̜ÀÃÃiiV̈˜}vÀœ“̅i“>˜Þ iÝ>“«iÃœv̅iÌiV…˜œœ}Þ]ˆ˜VÕ`ˆ˜}ƂÃ̜“½Ã œÀ>`ˆ>] œ“L>À`ˆiÀ½Ã/>i˜Ì Î]-ˆi“i˜Ã½ˆÀiœ]>˜`-Ì>`iÀ½ÃˆÀÌ]̜ÃÕ««Þ̅iˆÀÕÀL>˜yiiÌð ˜`iw˜ˆ˜}̅iiÝ>V̘>ÌÕÀiœv/œÀœ˜Ìœ½ÃvÕÌÕÀiiiVÌÀˆV“Տ̈«i՘ˆÌyiiÌ] ̅iÀi>Ài>˜Õ“LiÀœvŽiÞµÕiÃ̈œ˜Ã̜Vœ˜Ãˆ`iÀÃÕÀÀœÕ˜`ˆ˜}ÌÀ>ˆ˜Èâi>˜` ܈`̅]>˜`yiiÌ՘ˆvœÀ“ˆÌÞ°ˆÛi˜̅i`À>“>̈Vˆ˜VÀi>Ãiˆ˜V>«>VˆÌÞ«œÃÈLi ܈̅“œÀivÀiµÕi˜Ìœ«iÀ>̈œ˜]/œÀœ˜ÌœVœÕ`«ÀœL>LÞœ«iÀ>ÌiÜi܈̅Ș}i‡ iÛiÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã]܅ˆV…Li˜iwÌvÀœ“iˆ“ˆ˜>̈˜}̅iV…œŽi«œˆ˜ÌÃ>ÌÃÌ>ˆÀÃ>˜`̅Õà ëi˜`iÃÃ̈“iÈÌ̈˜}>ÌÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã°>˜Þœv̅iLÕÈiÃÌÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÜ>ÞȘ ̅iܜÀ`]ˆŽi/œŽÞœ½Ã]ÕÃiȘ}i‡iÛiV>ÀÃvœÀ̅ˆÃÀi>ܘ°vLˆiÛiÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>Ài «ÀiviÀÀi``Õi̜̅iˆÀ>À}iÀÃi>̈˜}V>«>VˆÌÞ]܅ˆV…ˆÃÛ>Õ>Liœ˜œ˜}iÀÀœÕÌià ܅iÀiÀˆ`iÀÃ`œ˜½ÌÜ>˜Ì̜ÃÌ>˜`]̅iÀi>Ài˜Õ“iÀœÕÃ…ˆ}…‡«iÀvœÀ“>˜ViLˆiÛi “Տ̈«i՘ˆÌÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>Û>ˆ>Liœ˜̅i}œL>“>ÀŽiÌ° Ý>“«iȘVÕ`i̅iä™ ÕÃi`œ˜̅iLÕÈiÃ̏ˆ˜iÃœv*>ÀˆÃ½, ,œÀ̅i˜iÜ7>À>Ì>… 1Ãœv-Þ`˜iÞ,>ˆ° Ƃ˜œÌ…iÀÜ>Þ̜õÕiiâiœÕÌ“œÀiÃi>̈˜}V>«>VˆÌÞ܈̅œÕÌ̅i>``i` Vœ“«i݈ÌÞ>˜`œ˜}iÀÃÌ>̈œ˜`Üi̈“iÃœvLˆiÛiÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃܜՏ`Li̜Vœ˜Ãˆ`iÀ >VµÕˆÀˆ˜}܈`iÀÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã°-ˆ˜Vi"/À>˜ÃˆÌ`œi؜̅>Ûii݈Ã̈˜}…ˆ}…«>ÌvœÀ“Ã̜ Counterintuitively, using cars with less capacity can increase overall line capacity if it means passengers can board and alight more quickly, and therefore trains won’t need to dwell so long at stations. *>ÀˆÃÀi}ˆœ˜>ÌÀ>ˆ˜ˆ˜ÌiÀˆœÀÃœvviÀ>ÌÌÀ>V̈Ûi`iÈ}˜̜i˜ÌˆViÀˆ`iÀð 34- 115 - /…i/ÀˆˆÕ“«>˜«Àœ«œÃiÃ̅i >VµÕˆÃˆÌˆœ˜œv>yiiÌœv…ˆ}…‡ «iÀvœÀ“>˜ViiiVÌÀˆV“Տ̈«i ՘ˆÌÃ܈̅՘ˆvœÀ“«iÀvœÀ“>˜Vi V…>À>VÌiÀˆÃ̈VÃ̜“>݈“ˆâiVœÀÀˆ`œÀ V>«>VˆÌÞ]Àiˆ>LˆˆÌÞ]>˜`ëii`° 7…ˆiȘ}iiÛiÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>ÀiˆŽiÞ ̜œvviÀÃÕvwVˆi˜ÌV>«>VˆÌÞœ˜ >VœÀÀˆ`œÀÃvœÀ̅ivœÀiÃii>Li vÕÌÕÀi]}ˆÛi˜̅i…ˆ}…vÀiµÕi˜VÞ œvœ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ã]“œ`iÀ˜Ìܜ‡iÛi “Տ̈«i՘ˆÌÃVœÕ`LiÕÃi`œ˜ ̅iœ˜}iÃÌ`ˆÃÌ>˜ViÃiÀۈVià ̜“>݈“ˆâiÃi>̈˜}V>«>VˆÌÞ° /…ii}>VÞ"LˆiÛiV>À>˜` œVœ“œÌˆÛiyiiÌŜՏ`Li }À>`Õ>Þ«…>Ãi`œÕÌ>ÃVœÀÀˆ`œÀà >ÀiVœ˜ÛiÀÌi`̜Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ œ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ã°-Ì>̈œ˜ÃŜՏ`Li Õ«}À>`i`̜…ˆ}…«>ÌvœÀ“Ã̅>Ì i˜>LiiÛiLœ>À`ˆ˜}ÕȘ}> «…>Ãi`>««Àœ>V…]܈̅œ˜i…>v œv̅i«>ÌvœÀ“À>ˆÃi`܅ˆi̅i œÌ…iÀ…>vÀi“>ˆ˜Ãˆ˜ÃiÀۈVi]܈̅ ̅iÀi“>ˆ˜`iÀÀ>ˆÃi`œ˜Vi˜iÜ iµÕˆ«“i˜ÌˆÃˆ˜ÌÀœ`ÕVi`° Vœ˜ÃÌÀ>ˆ˜ÌÀ>ˆ˜܈`̅]ˆÌ“>ÞLi«œÃÈLi̜ÕÃi̅i܈`iÀ ÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃÌ>˜`>À`œv̅i œÀ`ˆVVœÕ˜ÌÀˆið/…ˆÃܜՏ`…>Ûi̅i >``ˆÌˆœ˜>>`Û>˜Ì>}iœvÀi`ÕVˆ˜}̅i«œÌi˜Ìˆ>vœÀVœ˜yˆVÌ ܈̅܈`ivÀiˆ}…ÌÌÀ>ˆ˜Ãœ«iÀ>̈˜}œ˜̅iVœÀÀˆ`œÀ𠈘>Þ]>Vœ˜ÃˆÃÌi˜Ì̅i“i>“œ˜}̜«}œL>Ài}ˆœ˜> À>ˆœ«iÀ>̜ÀÈÃ̅>Ì̅iÞœ«iÀ>Ìi՘ˆvœÀ“iiVÌÀˆV “Տ̈«i՘ˆÌyiiÌÃ]>˜`̅iÞ`œ˜œÌÕÃi>˜ÞœVœ“œÌˆÛi‡ …>Տi`ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ãœ˜“>ˆ˜ÕÀL>˜ÀœÕÌið/…ii݈Ã̈˜} œVœ“œÌˆÛi‡…>Տi`LˆiÛiÌÀ>ˆ˜Ãœ«iÀ>Ìi`LÞ"/À>˜ÃˆÌ …>ÛiÃÕV…À>`ˆV>Þ`ˆvviÀi˜Ì«iÀvœÀ“>˜ViV…>À>VÌiÀˆÃ̈Và vÀœ““œ`iÀ˜Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã­LœÌ…ˆ˜ÌiÀ“Ãœv >VViiÀ>̈œ˜>˜`ÃÌ>̈œ˜`Üi̈“iî]̅>Ì̅iˆÀÀiÌi˜Ìˆœ˜ ܜՏ`vœÀViÃiÀˆœÕÃÃ>VÀˆwViȘV>«>VˆÌÞ>˜`̅i˜ii` vœÀœÌ…iÀ܈Ãi՘˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀiˆ˜ÛiÃ̓i˜Ì° ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi“ÕÃÌ>Ü>ÞÃLi`iÈ}˜i`vœÀ̅i«œœÀiÃ̇ «iÀvœÀ“ˆ˜}ÌÀ>ˆ˜̅>Ì܈ÕÃiˆÌ°˜£™n™]՘ˆV…½Ã-‡ >…˜ ÌiÃÌi`vœÀ>“œ˜Ì…>{‡V>ÀLˆ‡iÛiÌÀ>ˆ˜«œÜiÀi`LÞÌܜ iiVÌÀˆVœVœ“œÌˆÛiÃÆ̅ˆÃÛiÀÞ…ˆ}…‡«œÜiÀi`­££°Ó7® ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̈VœÕ`˜œÌ“>ÌV…̅ï“iÌ>Liœv>iÃëœÜiÀi` ­Ç7®Ș}i‡iÛi 1LiV>ÕÃiœv“ÕV…œ˜}iÀÃÌ>̈œ˜ `Üi̈“ið/…>Ì“i>˜Ã̅>Ìœ«iÀ>̈˜}iÛi˜>Ó> ˜Õ“LiÀœvÌÀˆ«Ãœ˜>VœÀÀˆ`œÀ܈̅iÃÃœ«Ìˆ“ˆâi`Àœˆ˜} Ã̜VŽܜՏ`ÀiµÕˆÀi>À}i>˜``ˆÃÀի̈Ûiˆ˜ÛiÃ̓i˜Ìà ˆ˜>``ˆÌˆœ˜>ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi°/…ii}>VÞ"/À>˜ÃˆÌyiiÌ “>Þw˜`>ÃiVœ˜`ˆviœ˜œ˜}iÀ‡`ˆÃÌ>˜Viˆ˜ÌiÀ‡Ài}ˆœ˜> ÃiÀۈViÃ̜܅ˆV…̅iÞ>ÀiLiÌÌiÀÃՈÌi`]«iÀ…>«ÃÀiwÌÌi` ܈̅Ãi>ÌÃ`iÈ}˜i`vœÀœ˜}‡…>ՏÌÀ>Ûi° /…iÃiä™ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã]“>`iLÞƂÃ̜“>˜` œ“L>À`ˆiÀ]>ÀiÕÃi`œ˜̅iLÕÈiÃÌ*>ÀˆÃ, ,VœÀÀˆ`œÀð CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 35- 116 - INFRASTRUCTURE 'NKOKPCVG%QPƃKEVU 7…i˜`iÈ}˜ˆ˜}>ÃiÀۈVi>˜`ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi«>˜]ˆÌˆÃ iÃÃi˜Ìˆ>̜iˆ“ˆ˜>Ìiˆ˜ÃÌ>˜ViÃ܅iÀiVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃVÀœÃÃœ˜i >˜œÌ…iÀ°ÕV…ˆŽiœ˜>Àœ>`]̅iÃi>̇}À>`iˆ˜ÌiÀÃiV̈œ˜Ã `À>“>̈V>ÞÀi`ÕViV>«>VˆÌÞ]>ÃÛi…ˆViÃV>˜œ˜Þ“œÛiˆ˜ œ˜i`ˆÀiV̈œ˜>Ì>̈“ipVœ˜Ãˆ`iÀ̅i`ˆvviÀi˜Viˆ˜Ûi…ˆVi ëii`>˜`ۜÕ“iLiÌÜii˜>VœÛiÀi>vˆ˜ÌiÀV…>˜}i >˜`>ÌÀ>vwVˆ}…Ì°œÀ>À>ˆÜ>Þ]VÀœÃȘ}Ã>ÀiiÛi˜“œÀi ÀiÃÌÀˆV̈Ûi̅>˜vœÀ>Àœ>`ȘViÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>Ài“ÕV…œ˜}iÀ >˜`ÀiµÕˆÀi>À}iÀÃ>viÌÞ“>À}ˆ˜Ã°Ƃ˜ÞÃV…i`Տi`i>Þà V>˜Àˆ««i̅ÀœÕ}…œÕÌ̅iÃÞÃÌi“°/…ˆÃˆÃ܅Þ"/À>˜ÃˆÌ …>ȘÛiÃÌi`ˆ˜>˜Õ“LiÀœvœÛiÀ«>ÃÃiÃ>˜`՘`iÀ«>ÃÃià ̜iˆ“ˆ˜>Ìi̅iÃiVœ˜yˆVÌÃLiÌÜii˜"VœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ>˜` ˆ“«œÀÌ>˜ÌvÀiˆ}…ÌÀ>ˆÀœÕÌiȘ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜° 7…i˜VÀi>̈˜}>ÃiÀۈVi«>˜]ˆÌV>˜Li«œÃÈLi̜ iˆ“ˆ˜>Ìi“>˜ÞVÀœÃȘ}ÀœÕÌiÃ܈̅œÕ̘ii`ˆ˜}̜ LՈ`iÝ«i˜ÃˆÛiœÛiÀ«>ÃÃiÃȓ«ÞLÞ«>ˆÀˆ˜}“>ÌV…ˆ˜} VœÀÀˆ`œÀÃœ˜iˆÌ…iÀÈ`iœv̅iVi˜ÌÀ>Ãi}“i˜Ì°œÀ iÝ>“«i]>ŽiŜÀi >ÃÌ>˜`>ŽiŜÀi7iÃÌLœÌ…>Ài ̅iÜÕ̅iÀ˜“œÃÌVœÀÀˆ`œÀȘ̅i˜iÌܜÀŽ°-œ]>Ïœ˜}>à ̅iÞÀ՘œ˜>`i`ˆV>Ìi`ÃiÌœvÌÀ>VŽÃœ˜̅iÜÕ̅È`iœv 1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜]>ŽiŜÀiÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃܜՏ`˜œÌ˜ii`̜Vœ˜yˆVÌ ܈̅>˜ÞœÌ…iÀÃiÀۈVi°ˆŽi܈Ãi]«>ˆÀˆ˜}̅iˆÌV…i˜iÀ œÀ >ÀÀˆiˆ˜iÃ܈̅̅i,ˆV…“œ˜`ˆˆ˜iVœÕ`i˜>Li ÃÕV…>VœÀÀˆ`œÀ̜œ«iÀ>ÌiVœ˜yˆV̇vÀiiœ˜̅i˜œÀ̅È`i œv̅iVi˜ÌÀ>VœÀÀˆ`œÀ°˜V>ÃiÃ܅iÀiˆÌˆÃ˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞ̜ VÀœÃÜ̅iÀˆ˜iÃ̜“iiÌÃiÀۈVi«>˜˜ˆ˜}}œ>Ã]>yޜÛiÀ œÀyÞ՘`iÀŜՏ`LiLՈÌ̜«ÀiÛi˜Ì«œÌi˜Ìˆ>Vœ˜yˆVÌð Ƃ``ˆÌˆœ˜>yޜÛiÀÃVœÕ`Li>``i`̜ˆ˜VÀi>ÃiÀœṎ˜} yi݈LˆˆÌÞ]ˆv`iÈÀi`]LÕÌ`iÈ}˜ˆ˜}ÀœÕÌiÃ̜>ۜˆ`ÃÕV… Vœ˜yˆVÌÃ܅iÀi«œÃÈLi“ˆ˜ˆ“ˆâiÃ̅i˜ii`vœÀLՈ`ˆ˜} ̅>ÌiÝ«i˜ÃˆÛiˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi° /…i/ÀˆˆÕ“«>˜«Àœ«œÃiÃ̜ «>ˆÀVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃœ˜̅ii>ÃÌiÀ˜>˜` ÜiÃÌiÀ˜È`iÃœv̅i`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜ VœÀiˆ˜>Ü>Þ̅>Ìiˆ“ˆ˜>Ìià ˜i>ÀÞ>Vœ˜yˆV̈˜}“œÛi“i˜Ìà œvÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã܅ˆi“ˆ˜ˆ“ˆâˆ˜}̅i ˜ii`vœÀ˜iÜ}À>`iÃi«>À>̈œ˜ ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi°,œÕÌiÃ܈>Ãœ Li`iÈ}˜i`̜«>ÃÃ̅ÀœÕ}…̅i 1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜>Ài>܈̅œÕÌ«>ÃȘ} ̅ÀœÕ}…Å>À«Þ>˜}i`Ã܈ÌV…ià ̅>ÌvœÀViÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̜ϜÜ̜>VÀ>܏° /…ii݈Ã̈˜}yÞ՘`iÀ̜̅iÜiÃÌ œv1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜ˆÃ«œœÀÞœV>Ìi` vœÀÃÕV…œ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ã]>˜`ˆ˜>˜Þ V>ÃiܜՏ`˜ii`̜LiÀi“œÛi`̜ >VVœ““œ`>Ìi>-«>`ˆ˜>-Ì>̈œ˜° Ì܈LiÀi«>Vi`LÞ>Ó>iÀ] Ș}i‡ÌÀ>VŽyÞ՘`iÀœV>Ìi`̜ i˜>Lii>ÃÌLœÕ˜`ˆÌœ˜VœÀÀˆ`œÀ ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̜Ài>V…̅iÜÕ̅iÀ˜«>ÀÌœv ̅i1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜À>ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀÜ ̅>Ì̅iÞV>˜œˆ˜܈̅>ŽiŜÀi ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ãi>ÃÌœv1˜ˆœ˜°/…ˆÃ“œ`iÃÌ ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀiˆÃ>̅>̈Øii`i` ̜i˜>LiVœ˜yˆV̇vÀii“œÛi“i˜Ìà ̅ÀœÕ}…̅iÃÌ>̈œ˜>Ài>]ˆv̅iÌÀ>VŽ >ޜÕÌ­ˆÕÃÌÀ>Ìi`œ˜«>}i{£®ˆÃ À>̈œ˜>ˆâi`̜>ۜˆ`Vœ˜yˆVÌð When creating a service plan, it can be possible to eliminate many crossing routes without needing to build expensive overpasses simply by pairing matching corridors on either side of the central segment. 36- 117 - /…i/ÀˆˆÕ“«>˜ «Àœ«œÃiÃ̅iÕÃi œv / -œÀ>ȓˆ>À «ÀœÛi˜]ˆ˜ÌiÀœ«iÀ>Li ÃÌ>˜`>À`܈̅“Տ̈«i Ûi˜`œÀÃvœÀ“>݈“Õ“ vÕÌÕÀiyi݈LˆˆÌÞ° œ˜Ûi˜Ìˆœ˜>È}˜>ˆ˜} V>˜LiÕÃi`œ˜Å>Ài` Ãi}“i˜ÌÃ܈̅vÀiˆ}…Ì ÃiÀۈViðÌV>˜ÕÃi iˆÌ…iÀ“œÛˆ˜}LœVŽÃ œÀŜÀÌwÝi`LœVŽÃ° Ì“ÕÃÌLiV>«>Li œv>V…ˆiۈ˜}…ˆ}… ̅ÀœÕ}…«Õ̏iÛiÃ܅ˆi “>ˆ˜Ì>ˆ˜ˆ˜}Ã>viÌÞ° Implement Modern Interoperable Signalling ƂŽiÞ}œ>vœÀÈ}˜>ˆ˜}>Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÃÞÃÌi“ˆÃ̜Ì>Ži>`Û>˜Ì>}iœv ˆ˜ÌiÀ˜>̈œ˜>ÃÌ>˜`>À`Ã]Ü̅>Ì̅i>}i˜VÞ`œiØœÌ}ȉœVŽi`ˆ˜Ìœ> Ș}iÛi˜`œÀvœÀ>Li뜎iÃÞÃÌi“°/…iÀi>Ài“>˜Þ`ˆvviÀi˜ÌÈ}˜>ˆ˜} ÌiV…˜œœ}ˆiÃ̅>Ì…>ÛiLii˜ÕÃi`LÞ“>œÀÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆœ«iÀ>̜Àà ܜÀ`܈`i°/…i ÕÀœ«i>˜/À>ˆ˜ œ˜ÌÀœ-ÞÃÌi“­ / -®ˆÃ̅i`iv>V̜}œL> À>ˆÜ>ÞÈ}˜>ˆ˜}ÃÌ>˜`>À``i«œÞi`ˆ˜ ÕÀœ«i]ƂÈ>]ƂÕÃÌÀ>ˆ>]-œÕ̅ Ƃ“iÀˆV>>˜`i݈Vœ°/…i / -ÃÌ>˜`>À`Ü>Ã`iÈ}˜i`̜>V…ˆiÛiÀˆ}œÀœÕà Ã>viÌÞ]«iÀvœÀ“>˜Vi>˜`ˆ˜ÌiÀœ«iÀ>LˆˆÌÞVÀˆÌiÀˆ>Æ܈̅Þi>ÀÃ>˜`Lˆˆœ˜Ãœv `œ>ÀÃ…>ۈ˜}>Ài>`ÞLii˜ëi˜Ì̜>`Û>˜ViÌiV…˜œœ}Þ>˜`“iiÌ̅iÃi }œ>Ã]ˆÌˆÃˆ`i>vœÀ>/ÀˆˆÕ“,i}ˆœ˜>,>ˆ iÌܜÀŽ°/…iŽiÞ>`Û>˜Ì>}i œv>`œ«Ìˆ˜} / -ˆÃ̅>̈̈Ã]՘ˆŽi“>˜ÞœÌ…iÀÈ}˜>ˆ˜}ÌiV…˜œœ}ˆiÃ]> vՏÞˆ˜ÌiÀœ«iÀ>LiÃÌ>˜`>À`°/…>Ì“i>˜Ã̅>Ì>˜œ«iÀ>̜ÀˆÃ˜œÌ`i«i˜`i˜Ì œ˜>Ș}iÌiV…˜œœ}ÞÛi˜`œÀ°Ƃ“>œÀÈ}˜>ˆ˜}Ûi˜`œÀëÀœ`ÕVi iµÕˆ«“i˜Ì̅>Ì“iiÌÈÌȘÌiÀœ«iÀ>LˆˆÌÞÃÌ>˜`>À`ÃvœÀœ˜Lœ>À`>˜` ÌÀ>VŽÃˆ`iiµÕˆ«“i˜Ì° / -ˆÃV>«>Liœv`iˆÛiÀˆ˜}ÛiÀÞ…ˆ}…V>«>VˆÌÞpÕ« ̜ÎäÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã«iÀ…œÕÀœ˜>Ș}iÌÀ>VŽ°Ì«ÀiVˆÃiÞ`iÌiÀ“ˆ˜iÃ܅iÀi>ÌÀ>ˆ˜ ˆÃœV>Ìi`>˜`̅iëii`>Ì܅ˆV…ˆÌˆÃÌÀ>Ûiˆ˜}]ˆ˜œÀ`iÀ̜V>VՏ>Ìi̅i “ˆ˜ˆ“Õ“Ã>viÌÞ“>À}ˆ˜ˆ˜Ài>̈“i°/À>`ˆÌˆœ˜>È}˜>ˆ˜}ÃÞÃÌi“Ã>ÀiL>Ãi` œ˜`ˆÛˆ`ˆ˜}̅iˆ˜iˆ˜ÌœwÝi`LœVŽÃ]œ˜Þ>œÜˆ˜}ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ãˆ˜Ìœ՘œVVÕ«ˆi` LœVŽÃ°-ˆ˜Vi̅i«ÀiVˆÃiœV>̈œ˜œvÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃˆÃ˜œÌŽ˜œÜ˜]>À}iÃ>viÌÞ“>À}ˆ˜Ã >ÀiÀiµÕˆÀi`° / -«ÀiVˆÃiÞ`iÌiÀ“ˆ˜iÃ܅iÀi>ÌÀ>ˆ˜ˆÃœV>Ìi`>˜`̅i ëii`>Ì܅ˆV…ˆÌˆÃÌÀ>Ûiˆ˜}]ˆ˜œÀ`iÀ̜V>VՏ>Ìi̅i“ˆ˜ˆ“Õ“Ã>viÌÞ “>À}ˆ˜ˆ˜Ài>̈“i° / ->Ãœi˜>LiÃƂÕ̜“>̈V/À>ˆ˜"«iÀ>̈œ˜­Ƃ/"®̜ `iˆÛiÀVœ˜ÃˆÃÌi˜Ì«iÀvœÀ“>˜Vi>˜`i˜iÀ}ÞÃ>ۈ˜}ȘVœ˜}iÃÌi`>Ài>ψŽi ̅i1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜,>ˆ œÀÀˆ`œÀ° ÀˆÛiÀÃܜՏ`Ã̈LiÀiµÕˆÀi`̜“œ˜ˆÌœÀ ÃÞÃÌi“Ã>˜`œ«iÀ>Ìiœ˜˜œ˜‡>Õ̜“>Ìi`Ãi}“i˜Ìð / -V>˜Liˆ˜ÃÌ>i` >œ˜}È`iVœ˜Ûi˜Ìˆœ˜>È}˜>ˆ˜}]«ÀœÛˆ`ˆ˜}Ã>viÌÞ>˜`«iÀvœÀ“>˜Vi Li˜iwÌÃ̜«>ÃÃi˜}iÀÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã܈̅œÕÌÀiµÕˆÀˆ˜}vÀiˆ}…Ìœ«iÀ>̜ÀÃ̜ÀiÌÀœwÌ …Õ˜`Ài`ÃœvœVœ“œÌˆÛiÃ̜ÌÀ>Ûiœ˜ŜÀÌÃiV̈œ˜Ãœv̅i/ÀˆˆÕ“˜iÌܜÀŽ° EXPLAINER: ETCS œ˜Ûi˜Ìˆœ˜>À>ˆÀœ>`È}˜>ˆ˜}`ˆÛˆ`iÃÌÀ>VŽÃˆ˜ÌœwÝi`LœVŽÃÃi«>À>Ìi`LÞÈ}˜>Ã̜Žii«ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>«>ÀÌ° / -`ޘ>“ˆV>ÞV>VՏ>ÌiÃÌÀ>ˆ˜ë>Vˆ˜}L>Ãi`œ˜i>V…ÌÀ>ˆ˜½ÃLÀ>Žˆ˜}«iÀvœÀ“>˜Vi>˜``ˆÃ«>Þà ̅ˆÃˆ˜vœÀ“>̈œ˜`ˆÀiV̏Þ̜̅i`ÀˆÛiÀ°/…ˆÃ>œÜÃ…ˆ}…iÀëii`>˜`…ˆ}…iÀ̅ÀœÕ}…«ÕÌœ«iÀ>̈œ˜܅ˆi Ài`ÕVˆ˜}̅iˆŽiˆ…œœ`œvVœˆÃˆœ˜ÃpVÀˆÌˆV>̜̅iÃÕVViÃÃœv>Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ«>˜° Up to 30 trains per hour on a single track, with ETCS Comparison of traditional (below) and moving-block signalling systems (next page) CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 37- 118 - Infrastructure Design Based on Rolling Stock /…iÀi>Ài`ˆvviÀi˜ÌÌÞ«iÃœvÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã܈̅܈`iÞÛ>Àވ˜} «iÀvœÀ“>˜ViV…>À>VÌiÀˆÃ̈Vð/…iÃiV…>À>VÌiÀˆÃ̈Và `iÌiÀ“ˆ˜iˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀiÀiµÕˆÀi“i˜ÌðœÀiÝ>“«i]> vÀiˆ}…ÌÌÀ>ˆ˜V>˜˜œÌVˆ“LÃÌii«}À>`iÃ]>˜`ˆÌÀiµÕˆÀià Ã̜ÕÌLÀˆ`}iÃ>˜`œÛiÀ«>ÃÃiÃ̜…>˜`i…ˆ}…>ݏi Üiˆ}…ÌðiÌÀœˆ˜Ý½ÃVÕÀÀi˜Ì`iÈ}˜ÃÌ>˜`>À`Ã}i˜iÀ>Þ ˆ“ˆÌ}À>`iÃ̜Ó¯­ÌܜviiÌœviiÛ>̈œ˜V…>˜}i«iÀ …Õ˜`Ài`viiÌœv…œÀˆâœ˜Ì>`ˆÃÌ>˜Vi®]È}˜ˆwV>˜ÌÞ iÃÃ̅>˜̅iÎ]{œÀx¯}À>`iÃÕÃi`ˆ˜À>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ œ«iÀ>̈œ˜°/…iÃiÃÌ>˜`>À`Ã…>Ûi̅iˆ“«>VÌœv `œÕLˆ˜}­œÀ“œÀi®̅ii˜}̅œvyޜÛiÀÃ]ˆ˜VÀi>Ș} Vœ““Õ˜ˆÌÞˆ“«>VÌ>˜`«ÀœiVÌVœÃÌð ÞVœ˜ÌÀ>ÃÌ]>“œ`iÀ˜iiVÌÀˆV“Տ̈«i՘ˆÌÌÀ>ˆ˜ `iÈ}˜i`vœÀÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆœ«iÀ>̈œ˜ˆÃ“ÕV…ˆ}…ÌiÀ >˜`V>˜Vˆ“L“ÕV…ÃÌii«iÀ}À>`iÃ]ˆŽi>ÃÕLÜ>Þ ÌÀ>ˆ˜°˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi`iÈ}˜i`vœÀÃÕV…ÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃV>˜Li “ÕV…V…i>«iÀ>˜`iÃÃ`ˆÃÀի̈Ûi̜LՈ`° ݈Ã̈˜}" /À>ˆ˜Ã…>Ûi«iÀvœÀ“>˜ViiÛiÃ̅>̏ˆiLiÌÜii˜̅œÃi œv“œ`iÀ˜Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>˜`vÀiˆ}…ÌÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã°v̅iÃi >Àiœ«iÀ>Ìi`iÛi˜vœÀœVV>Ȝ˜>ÃiÀۈViÃ]Vœ˜Ãˆ`iÀ>LÞ …i>ۈiÀˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi“ÕÃÌLiLՈÌ̜ÃÕ««œÀÌ̅i“° œÃÌ/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜À>ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ…>Ûi>̏i>ÃÌ œVV>Ȝ˜>vÀiˆ}…ÌÀ>ˆÃiÀۈVið/…ˆÃ“i>˜Ã̅>Ì]vœÀ >«Àœ«œÃi`/ÀˆˆÕ“,i}ˆœ˜>,>ˆ iÌܜÀŽ]“œÃÌ ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi“ÕÃÌLi`iÈ}˜i`̜>VVœ““œ`>Ìi vÀiˆ}…ÌÀ>ˆ]܅ˆV…ˆÃ>Ãœ>˜iÃÃi˜Ìˆ>«>ÀÌœv̅i Ài}ˆœ˜½ÃÌÀ>˜Ã«œÀÌ>̈œ˜ÃÞÃÌi“°ÕÀ̅iÀ“œÀi] œÀ̅ Ƃ“iÀˆV>˜vÀiˆ}…ÌÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>Àiv>À…i>ۈiÀ>˜`œ˜}iÀ̅>˜ ̅iˆÀ ÕÀœ«i>˜>˜`ƂÈ>˜iµÕˆÛ>i˜Ìð"˜LÕÃÞvÀiˆ}…Ì ÀœÕÌiÃ]ˆŽiˆÌœ˜VœÀÀˆ`œÀ>˜`̅iˆÌV…i˜iÀVœÀÀˆ`œÀ LiÌÜii˜ À>“>i>>˜`iœÀ}i̜ܘ]Ãi«>À>ÌivÀiˆ}…Ì >˜`«>ÃÃi˜}iÀÌÀ>VŽÃ>ÀiiÃÃi˜Ìˆ>°/…iÃi…>Ûi>Ài>`Þ Lii˜LՈÌLiÌÜii˜*ˆVŽiÀˆ˜}>˜`"Å>Ü>œ˜̅i >ŽiŜÀi >ÃÌVœÀÀˆ`œÀ°"˜ÀœÕÌiÃ܈̅ˆ“ˆÌi`vÀiˆ}…Ì ÃiÀۈVi]ˆÌŜՏ`Li«œÃÈLi]vœÀiÝ>“«i]̜i˜>Li vÀiˆ}…ÌÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̜>ۜˆ`ÕȘ}ÃÌii«}À>`iÃi«>À>̈œ˜Ã ̅ÀœÕ}…ŜÀÌLÞ«>ÃÃÌÀ>VŽÃ° >˜>`ˆ>˜*>VˆwVvœœÜà ̅ˆÃ>««Àœ>V…ˆ˜̅i7iÃ̜˜>Ài>œv/œÀœ˜Ìœ°ˆ}…ÌiÀ Àœˆ˜}Ã̜VŽVœÕ`>Ãœ«ÀœÛˆ`iܓiyi݈LˆˆÌÞœ˜ ÀՏiÃÀi}>À`ˆ˜}Vœ˜ÃÌÀÕV̈œ˜œ˜ÈÌiÃ>`>Vi˜Ì̜ À>ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀð7ˆ`iÃiÌL>VŽÃ>˜`Ì>VÀ>ÅÜ>Ã>Ài iÃÃi˜Ìˆ>܅i˜…i>ÛÞvÀiˆ}…ÌÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã]«œÌi˜Ìˆ>ÞV>ÀÀވ˜} `>˜}iÀœÕÃ}œœ`Ã]«>ÃÃLÞ°/…iÞ>Ài]…œÜiÛiÀ] i˜ÌˆÀiÞ՘˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞ܅i˜>ˆ˜iˆÃLiˆ˜}iÝVÕÈÛiÞ ÕÃi`Lޏˆ}…ÌÜiˆ}…Ì«>ÃÃi˜}iÀÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã°-ÕV…>V…>˜}i ܜՏ`}œ>œ˜}Ü>Þ̜v>VˆˆÌ>̈˜}ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ‡œÀˆi˜Ìi` `iÛiœ«“i˜Ì° 425 m at a 2% grade 213 m at a 4% grade /…i/ÀˆˆÕ“«>˜«Àœ«œÃiÃ̅>̈˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀiLi`iÈ}˜i`̜̅i«ÀiVˆÃi˜ii`Ãœv…ˆ}…‡«iÀvœÀ“>˜Vi iiVÌÀˆV“Տ̈«i՘ˆÌÃ܅iÀiÛiÀ«œÃÈLi]Ài`ÕVˆ˜}̅iiÝ«i˜Ãi̅>ÌܜՏ`Li˜ii`i`̜`iÈ}˜vœÀœÜiÀ‡ «iÀvœÀ“ˆ˜}iµÕˆ«“i˜Ì° Þ«>ÃÃÌÀ>VŽÃ܈LiÕÃi`vœÀvÀiˆ}…ÌÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̜>ۜˆ`ÕȘ}ÃÌii«}À>`iÃi«>À>̈œ˜Ã >˜`œÌ…iÀˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi° /…iÃÌii«iÀVˆ“LÃ̅>Ì>Ài«œÃÈLi܈̅“œ`iÀ˜ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>œÜ̅ii˜}̅œvœÛiÀ«>ÃÃiÃ̜LiVṎ˜…>v]Ài`ÕVˆ˜}iÝ«i˜Ãi>˜`Vœ““Õ˜ˆÌÞ `ˆÃÀի̈œ˜° 38- 119 - Yards Located on the Outskirts *i>Ž‡«iÀˆœ`‡vœVÕÃi`]՘ˆ`ˆÀiV̈œ˜>Vœ““ÕÌiÀÀ>ˆœ«iÀ>̈œ˜ÃÕÃi “ÕV…œv̅iˆÀiµÕˆ«“i˜Ìœ˜ÞvœÀ>viÜ…œÕÀëiÀ`>Þ° œÌœ˜ÞˆÃ ̅ˆÃ>“>ÃÈÛi՘`iÀṎˆâ>̈œ˜œviµÕˆ«“i˜Ì>˜`ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi]LÕÌˆÌ >ÃœÀiµÕˆÀiÃÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̜LiÃ̜Ài`ܓi܅iÀi˜i>À̅iVˆÌÞVi˜ÌÀi°/…ˆÃ ÀiÃՏÌȘ…>ۈ˜}̜œVVÕ«Þܓiœv̅i“œÃÌiÝ«i˜ÃˆÛiÀi>iÃÌ>Ìiˆ˜ ̅iVœÕ˜ÌÀÞ̜Ã̜ÀiÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̅>ÌVœÕ`œÌ…iÀ܈ÃiLiœÕÌœ˜̅i˜iÌܜÀŽ «ÀœÛˆ`ˆ˜}ÃiÀۈVi° Ƃ/ÀˆˆÕ“,i}ˆœ˜>,>ˆ iÌܜÀŽ«ÀœÛˆ`iÃ>L>>˜Vi`ÃiÀۈVi«>˜܈̅ ̅ÀœÕ}…‡À՘˜ˆ˜}]“i>˜ˆ˜}̅>ÌÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃܜՏ`À՘̅ÀœÕ}…̅iVˆÌÞVi˜ÌÀi ̜̅iœÌ…iÀÈ`iœv̅iÀi}ˆœ˜°/…ÕÃ]ˆvܓiÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã˜ii`̜LiÃ̜Ài` œvv‡«i>Ž]ˆÌV>˜Li`œ˜iœ˜v>ÀiÃÃiÝ«i˜ÃˆÛiÀi>iÃÌ>Ìi°i>˜Ü…ˆi] >À}iVˆÌއVi˜ÌÀiÃ̜À>}iÞ>À`ÃV>˜LiÀi`iÛiœ«i`܈̅>``ˆÌˆœ˜> ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã̜ˆ“«ÀœÛiÃÞÃÌi“>VViÃÃ]œÀ܈̅ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ‡œÀˆi˜Ìi``iÛiœ«“i˜Ì° /Àˆ«i‡ÌÀ>VŽ>ÀÀ>˜}i“i˜ÌÃ>ÀiÛiÀÞÀ>ÀiœÕÌÈ`i œÀ̅Ƃ“iÀˆV>LiV>ÕÃi ̅iÞVÀi>Ìi՘L>>˜Vi`œ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ã̅>ÌÀiµÕˆÀiÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̜LiÃ̜Ài`ˆ˜̅i VˆÌÞVi˜ÌÀi°˜ÃÌi>`]`œÕLi‡œÀµÕ>`‡ÌÀ>VŽVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃi˜>LiL>>˜Vi` œ«iÀ>̈œ˜̅>Ì“>݈“ˆâiÃÕÃiœvˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi>˜`iµÕˆ«“i˜Ì° Road/Rail Grade Separation Ո`ˆ˜}œÛiÀ«>ÃÃiÃœÀ՘`iÀ«>ÃÃiÃ̜Ãi«>À>ÌiÀœ>`>˜`À>ˆÌÀ>vwVˆÃ ˆ“«œÀÌ>˜Ì>ÌÛiÀÞLÕÃÞˆ˜ÌiÀÃiV̈œ˜Ã]LṎÌÃ…ˆ}…VœÃ̈؜̘iViÃÃ>ÀÞ iÛiÀÞ܅iÀi°ƂÌ“œÀi“ˆ˜œÀˆ˜ÌiÀÃiV̈œ˜Ã]̅iVœÃÌ>˜``ˆÃÀի̈œ˜ œvœÛiÀ«>ÃÃiÃœÀœvVœÃˆ˜}ÃÌÀiiÌÈÃ>“>œÀVœ˜ÌÀˆLÕ̜À̜«ÀœiVÌ LÕ`}iÌ>˜`Vœ““Õ˜ˆÌÞœ««œÃˆÌˆœ˜°/À>˜Ã«œÀÌ >˜>`>…>ÃÌÀ>`ˆÌˆœ˜>Þ ÕÃi`>ÃÌ>˜`>À`L>Ãi`œ˜̅i˜Õ“LiÀœvÀœ>`Ûi…ˆViÓՏ̈«ˆi`LÞ ̅i˜Õ“LiÀœvÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃÕȘ}>iÛiVÀœÃȘ}i>V…`>Þ°/…ˆÃ>««Àœ>V…] …œÜiÛiÀ]`œiØœÌÌ>Žiˆ˜Ìœ>VVœÕ˜Ì̅iÛiÀÞ`ˆvviÀi˜ÌÜ>ÞÃ>ÌÀ>ˆ˜V>˜ œVVÕ«Þ>VÀœÃȘ}°Ƃœ˜}vÀiˆ}…ÌÌÀ>ˆ˜œ«iÀ>̈˜}>̏œÜëii`V>˜…>Ûi ̅iVÀœÃȘ}}>ÌiÃ`œÜ˜vœÀwÛi“ˆ˜ÕÌiÃœÀ“œÀi°ƂŜÀÌ«>ÃÃi˜}iÀ ÌÀ>ˆ˜œ«iÀ>̈˜}>ÌVœ“«>À>̈ÛiÞ…ˆ}…ëii`܈œ˜ÞœVVÕ«Þ>VÀœÃȘ} vœÀ>viÜÃiVœ˜`ð Ûi˜܈̅̅iÃ>viÌÞ“>À}ˆ˜ÀiµÕˆÀi`LivœÀi>˜`>vÌiÀ /…i/ÀˆˆÕ“«>˜«Àœ«œÃià ̜̅ÀœÕ}…‡À՘>ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã ܅iÀi«œÃÈLi]܈̅ ÌÕÀ˜>ÀœÕ˜`ÏœV>Ìi`>Ì̅i œÕÌiÀi˜`Ãœvˆ˜ið-ˆ˜Vi ̅iÀi>Ài“œÀiVœÀÀˆ`œÀà œ˜̅iÜiÃÌiÀ˜È`iœv̅i Ài}ˆœ˜̅>˜œ˜̅ii>ÃÌiÀ˜] ˆÌ܈Li˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞ̜ ÌÕÀ˜>̏i>ÃÌܓiÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã° /ÀˆˆÕ“«Àœ«œÃiÃ̅ˆÃLi `œ˜i>Ì>˜iÜÃÌ>̈œ˜ œV>Ìi`>Ì …iÀÀÞ-ÌÀiiÌ œ˜̅ii݈Ã̈˜} œ˜9>À` ÈÌi]܅ˆV…ܜՏ`>Ãœ ÃiÀÛi`iÛiœ«“i˜ÌȘ ̅i7iÃÌ œ˜>˜`Ã] >ÃÌ >ÞvÀœ˜Ì]>˜`*œÀÌ>˜`ð -œ“iÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃVœÕ`>ÃœLi ÌÕÀ˜i`>Ì̅i«Àœ«œÃi` "/À>˜ÃˆÌv>VˆˆÌÞˆ˜̅i œ˜6>iÞ˜œÀ̅œv̅i œœÀ6ˆ>`ÕVÌ]i˜>Lˆ˜} >``ˆÌˆœ˜>ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã>œ˜} ̅i œ˜,ˆÛiÀ>Ì+Õii˜ >˜`iÀÀ>À`-ÌÀiiÌð/…i >ÌÌiÀܜՏ`«ÀœÛˆ`i`ˆÀiVÌ À>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÃiÀۈVi̜ ,i}i˜Ì*>ÀŽ° /…ˆÃyޜÛiÀˆ˜iÀ“>˜ÞˆÕÃÌÀ>ÌiÃ…œÜ“ÕV…Ó>iÀ}À>`iÃi«>À>̈œ˜ÃV>˜Li܈̅“œ`iÀ˜ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã°­“>}i\ iÕÌÃV…i >…˜® 39- 120 - >ÌÀ>ˆ˜«>ÃÃiÃ]̅iÀœ>`܈Ã̈LiœLÃÌÀÕVÌi`vœÀiÃÃ̈“i̅>˜>Ì >˜œÀ“>Ài`ÌÀ>vwVˆ}…Ì°/…iŜÀÌiÀLÀ>Žˆ˜}`ˆÃÌ>˜ViÃœv>“œ`iÀ˜ 1ÌÀ>ˆ˜V>˜È}˜ˆwV>˜ÌÞŜÀÌi˜̅ï“i}>ÌiÓÕÃÌLiVœÃi`° ÕÀœ«i>˜>˜`ƂÈ>˜Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÜ>ÞÃ]iÛi˜œ˜ܓiÛiÀÞLÕÃÞÀ>ˆ VœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ]`œ˜œÌ}À>`iÃi«>À>Ìi>VÀœÃȘ}ð˜ÃÌi>`]̅iÞ>`œ«Ì> “œÀiÃiiV̈Ûi>««Àœ>V…]Ãi«>À>̈˜}̅iLÕÈiÃÌÀœ>`Ã܅iÀi̅iÀiˆÃ ̅i}Ài>ÌiÃÌ«œÃÈLˆˆÌÞœvVœ˜yˆVÌ܅ˆiiÃi܅iÀiÕȘ}…ˆ}…‡µÕ>ˆÌÞ }>ÌiÃ̅>ÌvՏÞLœVŽ>Àœ>`>˜`«ÀiÛi˜Ì`ÀˆÛiÀÃvÀœ“>ÌÌi“«Ìˆ˜}̜ À>Vi̅iÌÀ>ˆ˜°ˆÛi˜̅>ÌÀœ>`‡À>ˆ}À>`iÃi«>À>̈œ˜ÃV>˜VœÃÌÌi˜Ãœv “ˆˆœ˜Ãœv`œ>ÀÃ]Ãi«>À>̈˜}iÛiÀÞVÀœÃȘ}œ˜>VœÀÀˆ`œÀV>˜>``Õ« ̜>ÛiÀޏ>À}iiÝ«i˜`ˆÌÕÀi°ƂÌ“>œÀ>ÀÌiÀˆ>Àœ>`Ã]}À>`iÃi«>À>̈œ˜ ˆÃÕÃÕ>ÞiÃÃi˜Ìˆ>°œÀ“ˆ˜œÀ˜iˆ}…LœÕÀ…œœ`ÃÌÀiiÌÃ]…œÜiÛiÀ]ˆÌ“>Þ ˜œÌLi˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞ̜ëi˜`Ìi˜Ãœv“ˆˆœ˜Ãœv`œ>ÀÃ̜>ۜˆ`“ˆ˜œÀ ˆ˜Vœ˜Ûi˜ˆi˜VivœÀ>Ó>˜Õ“LiÀœv`ÀˆÛiÀðƂۜˆ`ˆ˜}՘˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞ }À>`iÃi«>À>̈œ˜Ã>ÃœÈ}˜ˆwV>˜ÌÞÀi`ÕViÃ̅i˜iˆ}…LœÕÀ…œœ` ˆ“«>VÌœvÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆœ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ã]«œÌi˜Ìˆ>Þ«ÀiÛi˜Ìˆ˜}̅i˜ii` vœÀ՘È}…̏ÞVœ˜VÀiÌiۈ>`ÕVÌÃ>˜``ˆÃÀի̈ÛiVœ˜ÃÌÀÕV̈œ˜°"˜iœv̅i >À}i>`Û>˜Ì>}iÃœvÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆœÛiÀ“iÌÀœÃÞÃÌi“ÃœÀœÌ…iÀÀ>«ˆ` ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÌiV…˜œœ}ˆiÈÃ̅>ÌiÝ«i˜ÃˆÛi}À>`iÃi«>À>̈œ˜Ã`œ˜œÌ…>Ûi̜ Li՘`iÀÌ>Ži˜>>Ìœ˜Vi°˜ÃÌi>`]̅iÞV>˜Li>``i`œ˜i>Ì>̈“i>à `ii“i`˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞœÀ>ÃVœ““Õ˜ˆÌˆiÃÀiµÕiÃÌ̅i“° /…i/ÀˆˆÕ“«>˜«Àœ«œÃià >«…>Ãi`>««Àœ>V…̜ ̅iiˆ“ˆ˜>̈œ˜œviÛi VÀœÃȘ}ð1˜`iÀ«>ÃÃià ŜՏ`LiLՈÌˆ““i`ˆ>ÌiÞ >Ì̅iLÕÈiÃÌ>ÀÌiÀˆ> Àœ>`ðœÜiÛiÀ]}ˆÛi˜̅i ŜÀÌ̈“i̅>ÌÀi}ˆœ˜> À>ˆÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã܈œVVÕ«Þ> iÛiVÀœÃȘ}]ˆÌˆÃ˜œÌ ˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞ̜iˆ“ˆ˜>Ìi̅i“ >̏iÃÃLÕÃÞÀœ>`ð/…ˆÃ܈ È}˜ˆwV>˜ÌÞÀi`ÕVi̅i ˜ii`vœÀ`ˆÃÀի̈Ûi>˜` iÝ«i˜ÃˆÛiVœ˜ÃÌÀÕV̈œ˜œÀ vœÀ«iÀ“>˜i˜ÌÀœ>`VœÃÕÀið ˜ ÕÀœ«i>˜`ƂÈ>]ˆÌˆÃVœ““œ˜̜…>ÛiiÛiVÀœÃȘ}ÃiÛi˜œ˜LÕÃÞÕÀL>˜À>ˆˆ˜iÃ̜Ài`ÕViVœÃÌ]>ۜˆ`Vœ˜ÃÌÀÕV̈œ˜`ˆÃÀի̈œ˜]>˜` «ÀiÛi˜ÌۈÃÕ>ˆ“«>VÌvÀœ“iiÛ>Ìi`ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi툓>}iÜÕÀVi\œœ}i >À̅®° 40- 121 - To Lakeshore East and Stouffville Lines To Richmond Hill Line To Kitchener, Barrie and Milton Lines To Lakeshore West Line Union StationSpadina Station Sherbourne Station Cherry Station 6 track Kitchener Corridor increases network capacity New, grade separated junction at Spadina allows Milton-Stouffville through-routing and higher reliability 6LPSOLĆHGURXWLQJWKURXJKWKHUnion Station throat permits a less complex and higher capaci-W\FRQĆJXUDWLRQ 8QLRQ6WDWLRQUHFRQĆJXUHGto 6 platforms + 12 tracks to allow for wider platforms and improved circulation New Cherry Station supports high capacity terminal operations on a small footprint, while also serving nearby development New station complex at Spadina serves growing area, and reduces pressure on Union’s platforms Union Station Rail Corridor: Conceptual Proposal T7/T8 (Barrie Line) T4/T5/T6 (Kitchener/Richmond Hill Lines) T9 (Milton/Stouffville Lines) T1/T2/T3 (Lakeshore Lines) VIA Rail Key Black lines indicate track not used in normal RER service Kitchener Local (12tph)Barrie Line and Kitchener Exp. (15tph)Stouffville-Milton Line (12tph)Via Rail Via Rail 12tph 12tph 15tph 15tph 8tph 18tph 8tph 18tph Inner tracks: Lakeshore Express (8tph)Outer Tracks:Lakeshore Local (6tph) Labels show peak throughput New Sherbourne Station helps relieve Union Station, while also increasing transit connectivity for the St. Lawrence neighborhood Union Station 1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜>˜`ˆÌÃ>`>Vi˜ÌÀ>ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀˆÃ̅iŽiÞÃ̜˜i œv̅iÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ˜iÌܜÀŽ°/œÀœ˜ÌœˆÃˆ˜VÀi`ˆLÞvœÀÌ՘>Ìi ̜>Ài>`Þ…>Ûi>ÛiÀÞ܈`iVœÀÀˆ`œÀ܈̅ˆ““i˜Ãi «œÌi˜Ìˆ>V>«>VˆÌް̈ÃVœ˜ÃÌÀ>ˆ˜i`]…œÜiÛiÀ]LÞÃÌ>̈œ˜ «>ÌvœÀ“Ã>˜`ÌÀ>VŽ>ޜÕÌ̅>ÌÜiÀi`iÈ}˜i`>Vi˜ÌÕÀÞ >}œvœÀ̅iœ«iÀ>̈˜}«>ÌÌiÀ˜Ãœv̅>Ì̈“i°/…iÞ˜ii` ÃÕLÃÌ>˜Ìˆ>V…>˜}iˆv̅i«Àœ“ˆÃiœvÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆˆÃ̜Li >V…ˆiÛi`°œÀÌ՘>ÌiÞ]̅iÀiˆÃÃÕvwVˆi˜Ì>˜`>Ài>̜`œˆÌ ܈̅œÕ̘ii`ˆ˜}iÝ«i˜ÃˆÛi՘`iÀ}ÀœÕ˜`ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã]ˆŽiˆ˜ “>˜Þ ÕÀœ«i>˜>˜`ƂÈ>˜VˆÌˆið /…ivœœÜˆ˜}ÃiV̈œ˜Ã`iÌ>ˆ̅iÃiVœ˜ÃÌÀ>ˆ˜ÌÃ>˜`̅i ˆ˜ÌiÀ˜>̈œ˜>LiÃÌ«À>V̈ViÃ̅>ÌVœÕ`Ài܏Ûi̅i“° To Richmond Hill Line To Kitchener, Barrie and Milton Lines To Lakeshore West Line To Lakeshore East and Stouffville Lines To Don Yard To Danforth Yard Union Station Union Station Rail Corridor: Today Overcomplex Union Station throat slows trains and reduces capacity Narrow platforms and poor circulation increase dwell times, reducing capacity and reliability Yard facilities near downtown consume valuable land while increasing operational complexity Arrangement of tracks and service SDWWHUQVFDXVHIUHTXHQWFRQćLFWVbetween trains, adding to reliability and capacity issues Lack of alternate stations to Union in and around Downtown Toronto increases pressure on Union’s infrastructure and reduces connectivity Constrained approaches to the Union Station Corridor reduce capacity /…i/ÀˆˆÕ“«>˜«Àœ«œÃiÃ̅i Vœ˜Vi«ÌÕ>>ޜÕÌvœÀ̅i1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜ VœÀÀˆ`œÀŜܘˆ˜̅iw}ÕÀi>LœÛi°7…ˆi ̅ˆÃ«Àœ«œÃ>½Ãw˜iÀ`iÌ>ˆÃ>Àiyi݈Li] ÜiLiˆiÛi̅ˆÃ«>ÌvœÀ“>ÃÈ}˜“i˜Ì] ÃÌ>̈œ˜œV>̈œ˜]>˜`ˆ˜i«>ˆÀˆ˜}ÃV…i“i ܜՏ`“>݈“ˆâi̅ˆÃŽiÞVœÀÀˆ`œÀ½Ã V>«>VˆÌÞ܈̅œṎ˜VÕÀÀˆ˜}iÝViÃÈÛiVœÃÌà ̜LՈ`“œÀiVœ“«i݈˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀiˆŽi ՘`iÀ}ÀœÕ˜`«>ÌvœÀ“ð T7/T8 (Barrie Line) T4/T5/T6 (Kitchener/Richmond Hill Lines) T9 (Milton/Stouffville Lines) Key T1/T2/T3 (Lakeshore Lines) VIA Rail Black lines indicate track not used in normal RER service CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 41- 122 - The Châtelet-Les Halles RER complex in Paris moves more than twice as many trains per hour as Toronto Union on half as many tracks. Black lines indicate track not used in normal RER service. RER A RER B RER C TRACK LAYOUT ƂÌÀ>`ˆÌˆœ˜>À>ˆÃÌ>̈œ˜vœVÕÃiÃœ˜yi݈LˆˆÌÞ]>œÜˆ˜} >˜ÞÌÀ>ˆ˜̜ÕÃi>˜Þ«>ÌvœÀ“°/…ˆÃyi݈LˆˆÌÞ]…œÜiÛiÀ] Vœ“iÃ>Ì>VœÃÌ°/À>ˆ˜ÃVÀœÃȘ}œ˜i>˜œÌ…iÀVÀi>Ìi Vœ˜yˆVÌÃ̅>̏ˆ“ˆÌV>«>VˆÌÞ°ƂVœ“«ˆV>Ìi`ÜiLœv Ã܈ÌV…iÃvœÀViÃÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̜ϜÜ̜>VÀ>܏]vÕÀ̅iÀ Ài`ÕVˆ˜}V>«>VˆÌÞȘViV>«>VˆÌވÓ>݈“ˆâi`LÞ œ«iÀ>̈˜}ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>ÌÃÌi>`Þ>˜`Vœ˜ÃˆÃÌi˜Ìëii`ð̈à >ÃœVœ˜vÕȘ}vœÀ«>ÃÃi˜}iÀÃ]ȘVi̅iÞ`œ˜½ÌŽ˜œÜ ܅ˆV…«>ÌvœÀ“̅iˆÀÌÀ>ˆ˜܈LiÕȘ}LivœÀiˆÌ>ÀÀˆÛið œ`iÀ˜Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ˜iÌܜÀŽÃ]܅i̅iÀˆ˜/œŽÞœ] *>ÀˆÃ]œÀ iÀˆ˜]>“œÃÌ>Ü>ÞÃÕÃi`i`ˆV>Ìi`ÌÀ>VŽÃ `iÈ}˜i`̜œ«Ìˆ“ˆâiµÕˆVŽ>˜`ivwVˆi˜ÌÌÀ>ÛivœÀ i>V…ˆ˜`ˆÛˆ`Õ>ÀœÕÌi°ÌˆÃˆ“«œÀÌ>˜Ì̅>Ì>/ÀˆˆÕ“ ,i}ˆœ˜>,>ˆ iÌܜÀŽ`œÜ>ÃÜi°œÃÌ“œ`iÀ˜À>ˆ ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã>Àiv>Àȓ«iÀ̅>˜/œÀœ˜Ìœ½Ã1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜] >˜`̅>Ì…i«Ã̅i“̜“œÛi“>˜Þ“œÀi«>ÃÃi˜}iÀð 7i«Àœ«œÃiÀiLՈ`ˆ˜}1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜L>Ãi`œ˜ ̅iÃiˆ˜ÌiÀ˜>̈œ˜>LiÃÌ«À>V̈ViÃpÀi`ÕVˆ˜}̅i ˜Õ“LiÀœvÌÀ>VŽÃ]܈`i˜ˆ˜}«>ÌvœÀ“Ã]>˜`Ài`ÕVˆ˜} ̅iVœ“«i݈ÌÞœvÃiÀۈVi«>ÌÌiÀ˜Ã>˜`̅iÌiÀ“ˆ˜> ˆ˜ÌiÀœVŽˆ˜}ð-ˆ“«iÀÌÀ>VŽ>ޜÕÌÓi>˜̅>ÌÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã ܈˜œœ˜}iÀ˜ii`̜ϜÜ̜>VÀ>܏>Ã̅iÞ“œÛi ̅ÀœÕ}…̅i1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜>Ài>°7i«Àœ«œÃi>˜ >ÀÀ>˜}i“i˜Ì̅>Ì«ÀœÛˆ`iÃiÛiÀÞVœÀÀˆ`œÀ܈̅ˆÌà œÜ˜`i`ˆV>Ìi`«>ÌvœÀ“Ã>Ì1˜ˆœ˜]܈̅>Ài`ÕV̈œ˜ ̜£ÓÌÀ>VŽÃi˜>Lˆ˜}“ÕV…܈`iÀ«>ÌvœÀ“ð >V… ÌÀ>VŽܜՏ`ÃiÀÛi˜œ“œÀi̅>˜£nÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã«iÀ…œÕÀ‡‡ Vœ˜Ãˆ`iÀ>LÞiÃÃ̅>˜>Ì“>˜ÞÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÃÌ>̈œ˜Ãˆ˜ ÕÀœ«i>˜`ƂÈ>°6Ƃ,>ˆܜՏ`ÀiViˆÛivœÕÀ`i`ˆV>Ìi` «>ÌvœÀ“ÌÀ>VŽÃÆ}ˆÛi˜̅iÛiÀޏœ˜}«>ÌvœÀ“Ã>Ì1˜ˆœ˜] ˆÌܜՏ`Li«œÃÈLi̜…>˜`i“Տ̈«i6ƂÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>Ì >̈“i«iÀÌÀ>VŽ°Ƃ``ˆÌˆœ˜>VœÀi>Ài>ÃÌ>̈œ˜ÃܜՏ` Liˆ˜VÕ`i`̜ëÀi>`œÕÌ̅iœ>`vÀœ“1˜ˆœ˜>˜`̜ iˆ“ˆ˜>Ìi̅i˜ii`̜ÌÕÀ˜>˜ÞÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>Ì1˜ˆœ˜° /…iÃiV…>˜}iëœÃiܓiV…>i˜}iÃ]>˜`ˆÌˆÃ ՘vœÀÌ՘>Ìi̅>Ì̅iÞÜiÀi˜œÌˆ“«i“i˜Ìi`>Ì̅i Ã>“ï“i>Ã̅iLÀœ>`iÀÀiVœ˜ÃÌÀÕV̈œ˜œv̅iÃÌ>̈œ˜° -̈]̅iÞ>Ài>L܏ÕÌiÞiÃÃi˜Ìˆ>ˆv̅i}œ>Ãœv Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ>Ài̜Li>V…ˆiÛi`°ÌŜՏ`Li«œÃÈLi ̜ÀiœV>ÌiÌÀ>VŽÃ܅iÀi˜ii`i`°œÃÌœv̅ii݈Ã̈˜} ÌÀ>VŽÃ>ÀiÈÌÕ>Ìi``ˆÀiV̏Þ>LœÛiÃÕ««œÀÌVœÕ“˜Ã°vˆÌ ˆÃ˜iViÃÃ>ÀÞ̜“œÛi̅iÌÀ>VŽÃ]ˆÌŜՏ`Li«œÃÈLi ̜ÃÕ««œÀÌ̅i“܈̅>Li>“À՘˜ˆ˜}LiÌÜii˜̅i Ìܜ>`>Vi˜ÌVœÕ“˜Ã°vňv̈˜}̅iœV>̈œ˜œvÌÀ>VŽÃ ŜՏ`«ÀœÛi̜Lii˜ÌˆÀiÞˆ“«œÃÈLi]ˆÌܜՏ`Ã̈ Livi>ÈLi̜ȓ«ÞÀi“œÛiܓiÌÀ>VŽÃ>˜`LՈ` iÝ«>˜`i`«>ÌvœÀ“ÃœÛiÀ̜«° ,i}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ«>˜ÃŜՏ`>Ãœ“>݈“ˆâi̅iÕÃiœv >`Û>˜Vi`Ã܈ÌV…}iœ“iÌÀˆið ÕÀœ«i>˜ÌÕÀ˜œÕÌ`iÈ}˜ >œÜÃÃ܈ÌV…iÃœv̅iÃ>“ivœœÌ«Àˆ˜Ì̜…>˜`iÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã “œÛˆ˜}>ÌÈ}˜ˆwV>˜ÌÞ…ˆ}…iÀëii`Ã]Ài`ÕVˆ˜}ÌÀ>Ûi ̈“ivœÀÀˆ`iÀÃ>˜`ˆ˜VÀi>Ș}V>«>VˆÌÞ°£È 42- 123 - iÀˆ˜>Õ«ÌL>…˜…œv­>LœÛi®Ü>ÃLՈÌ܈̅܈`i«>ÌvœÀ“Ã̅>̏i>Ûi>“«iÀœœ“vœÀ«>ÃÃi˜}iÀÃ̜Ü>ˆÌ>˜`̅>ÌV>˜>VVœ““œ`>Ìi>VViÃà «œˆ˜ÌÃLÀœ>`i˜œÕ}…vœÀÌܜiÃV>>̜ÀÃ>˜`>܈`iÃÌ>ˆÀV>Ãi°/œÀœ˜Ìœ1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜«>ÌvœÀ“í˜iÝÌ«>}i®>ÀiL>ÀiÞ܈`ii˜œÕ}…vœÀ>viÜ «iœ«i̜«>ÃÃ]…>ÛiÛiÀÞ˜>ÀÀœÜÃÌ>ˆÀÃvœÀ>VViÃÃ]>˜`V>˜LiVœ“i`>˜}iÀœÕÏÞœÛiÀVÀœÜ`i`° PLATFORMS /…iŽiÞV>«>VˆÌÞVœ˜ÃÌÀ>ˆ˜Ìœ˜̅i"˜iÌܜÀŽˆÃ ̅i>“œÕ˜Ìœv̈“iÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã>ÀiÀiµÕˆÀi`̜ÈÌ>Ì1˜ˆœ˜ -Ì>̈œ˜̜œ>`>˜`՘œ>`°ÌˆÃ>˜œÀ`iÀœv“>}˜ˆÌÕ`i œ˜}iÀ̅>˜]vœÀiÝ>“«i]…œÜœ˜}ÃÕLÜ>ÞÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃÈÌ iÛi˜>ÌLÕÃÞ œœÀ‡9œ˜}iÃÌ>̈œ˜°˜«>ÀÌ]̅i«ÀœLi“ ˆÃ̅iˆ“ˆÌ>̈œ˜Ãœv̅ii݈Ã̈˜}LˆiÛiÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã° ÕÌ œ˜Vi«>ÃÃi˜}iÀÃ}iÌœvv̅iÌÀ>ˆ˜]̅iÞv>Vi>˜iµÕ>Þ ˆ“«œÀÌ>˜Ì«ÀœLi“œ˜̅i«>ÌvœÀ“°1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜½Ã «>ÌvœÀ“ÃÜiÀi`iÈ}˜i`>Vi˜ÌÕÀÞ>}œvœÀ>ÛiÀÞ `ˆvviÀi˜ÌŽˆ˜`œvÀ>ˆÃiÀۈVip«Ài`œ“ˆ˜>˜ÌÞœ˜}‡ `ˆÃÌ>˜ViÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã°ÌiÛi˜…>ë>ÌvœÀ“Ã̅>ÌÜiÀi`iÈ}˜i` ̜…>˜`i“>ˆ°/œ`>Þ]̅iˆÀ˜>ÀÀœÜ܈`̅ˆÃÃÕV…> ÃiÛiÀiV…œŽi«œˆ˜Ì̅>̈̈Ã>Ã>viÌÞ…>â>À`°*>ÃÃi˜}iÀà “ÕÃÌ̅i˜VÀœÜ`Ș}iwiœ˜Ìœ˜>ÀÀœÜÃÌ>ˆÀÃ`œÜ˜ ̜̅iVœ˜VœÕÀÃi°˜ iÀˆ˜>˜`*>ÀˆÃ]vœÀiÝ>“«i] «>ÌvœÀ“Ã>Ài>̏i>ÃÌ̅Àiï“iÃ>Ã܈`i>Ã>Ì1˜ˆœ˜ -Ì>̈œ˜°˜ÃÌi>`œv˜>ÀÀœÜÃÌ>ˆÀÃ]̅iÞ…>Ûii˜œÕ}…Àœœ“ vœÀ>LÀœ>`ÃÌ>ˆÀV>Ãiy>˜Ži`LÞ>«>ˆÀœviÃV>>̜Àð/…ˆÃ “i>˜Ã̅>Ì«>ÃÃi˜}iÀÃV>˜µÕˆVŽÞVi>À̅i«>ÌvœÀ“ ܅i˜̅iÞ}iÌœvv̅iÌÀ>ˆ˜°Ì>Ãœ“i>˜Ã̅>Ì̅iÀi ܜՏ`Lii˜œÕ}…Àœœ“vœÀ«>ÃÃi˜}iÀÃ̜Ü>ˆÌœ˜̅i «>ÌvœÀ“]>Ã̅iÞ`œœ˜̅iÃÕLÜ>Þ]À>̅iÀ̅>˜Ü>ˆÌˆ˜} `œÜ˜ÃÌ>ˆÀȘ̅iVœ˜VœÕÀÃi՘̈̅iÌÀ>ˆ˜>ÀÀˆÛið œÕ˜ÌiÀˆ˜ÌՈ̈ÛiÞ]̅iLiÃÌ܏Ṏœ˜vœÀ1˜ˆœ˜ -Ì>̈œ˜ܜՏ`Li̜Ài`ÕVi̅i˜Õ“LiÀœvˆÌà «>ÌvœÀ“ȘœÀ`iÀ̜“>Ži̅i“܈`iÀ°*>ÌvœÀ“à ̅>Ì>Ài܈`ii˜œÕ}…̅>ÌÀˆ`iÀÃ>Ài˜½ÌvœÀVi`̜ Ü>ˆÌ`œÜ˜ÃÌ>ˆÀÃ՘̈̅iˆÀÌÀ>ˆ˜>ÀÀˆÛiÃ]>˜`̅>Ì>vՏ >ÀÀˆÛˆ˜}ÌÀ>ˆ˜`œiؽÌV>ÕÃi̜LiVœ“i`>˜}iÀœÕÏÞ œÛiÀVÀœÜ`i`]܈`À>“>̈V>Þˆ˜VÀi>ÃiV>«>VˆÌÞLÞ ŜÀÌi˜ˆ˜}̅i>“œÕ˜Ìœv̈“iÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã˜ii`̜ÈÌ>Ì ̅iÃÌ>̈œ˜°Ì܈>Ãœ“>Ži«œÃÈLi“ÕV…܈`iÀ ÃÌ>ˆÀ>VViÃ뜈˜ÌÃ]i˜>Lˆ˜}«>ÌvœÀ“Ã̜Lii“«Ìˆi` “ÕV…“œÀiµÕˆVŽÞ>vÌiÀ>ÌÀ>ˆ˜>ÀÀˆÛiÃ>˜`̜«ÀœÛˆ`i ̅iVœ˜Ûi˜ˆi˜Vi>˜`Vœ“vœÀÌœviÃV>>̜ÀÃvœÀ «>ÃÃi˜}iÀð ,iLՈ`ˆ˜}̅i«>ÌvœÀ“Ã̜>“œ`iÀ˜>ÀÀ>˜}i“i˜Ì ܜՏ`ˆŽiÞÀiµÕˆÀi̅iÀi“œÛ>œv̅iÌÀ>ˆ˜Åi`° 7…ˆi̅iÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi…>Ã…ˆÃ̜ÀˆV>È}˜ˆwV>˜Vi]«>ÀÌ œvˆÌ…>Ã>Ài>`ÞLii˜Ài“œÛi`vœÀ̅i>``ˆÌˆœ˜œv >…ˆ}…}>ÃÃÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi]>˜`̅i˜ii`̜ˆ“«ÀœÛi̅i VˆÌ޽ÓœÃ̈“«œÀÌ>˜ÌÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ…ÕL“i>˜Ã̅>̈̓>Þ ˜ii`̜LiÀi“œÛi`°Ƃ˜iÝVii˜Ì܏Ṏœ˜VœÕ`Li ̜`ˆÃ“>˜Ìi>˜`“œÛi̅iÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi̜>`ˆvviÀi˜Ì œV>̈œ˜]«œÌi˜Ìˆ>Þœ˜̅iÜ>ÌiÀvÀœ˜Ì]܅iÀiˆÌVœÕ` LiivviV̈ÛiÞÀi«ÕÀ«œÃi`>Ã>“>ÀŽiÌ]i݅ˆLˆÌˆœ˜…>] œÀȓˆ>ÀÕÃi° 43- 124 - *…œÌœ\,œ`˜iÞ>ۈœ> Local Stations ECONOMICAL DESIGN Ƃ/ÀˆˆÕ“,i}ˆœ˜>,>ˆ iÌܜÀŽVœÕ`ˆ˜VœÀ«œÀ>ÌiÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã܈̅Ài>̈ÛiÞȓ«i `iÈ}˜]ȘVi̅iÞܜՏ`LiœV>Ìi`œ˜̅iÃÕÀv>Vi]>˜`ܜՏ`˜œÌÀiµÕˆÀi iÝ«i˜ÃˆÛi>˜``ˆÃÀի̈Ûi՘`iÀ}ÀœÕ˜``ˆ}}ˆ˜}°ƂÃÌ>̈œ˜LՈÌœÛiÀ>˜>ÀÌiÀˆ> Àœ>`V>˜ȓ«ÞVœ˜ÃˆÃÌœv>«>ÌvœÀ“܈̅V>˜œ«Þ]܈̅ÃÌ>ˆÀÃ>˜`iiÛ>̜À `œÜ˜̜̅iÃÌÀiiÌ°`i>Þ]>ÃÌ>̈œ˜ŜՏ`…>Ûi>vՏ‡i˜}̅V>˜œ«Þ]}ˆÛi˜̅i vÀiµÕi˜ÌÞˆ˜Vi“i˜ÌÜi>̅iÀˆ˜̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜°"˜̅iœÌ…iÀ…>˜`]ˆvÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã >ÀivÀiµÕi˜Ì]̅iÀiˆÃ˜œ˜ii`vœÀ>À}iÃÌ>̈œ˜LՈ`ˆ˜}ÃœÀÜ>ˆÌˆ˜}>Ài>ð>ˆ˜ ÃÌ>̈œ˜>VViÃÃVœÕ`ˆ`i>ÞLiœV>Ìi`>Ì`ˆvviÀi˜Ì«œˆ˜ÌÃ>œ˜}̅i«>ÌvœÀ“>Ì `ˆvviÀi˜ÌÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã>œ˜}>ˆ˜i]ˆ˜œÀ`iÀ̜i˜VœÕÀ>}i`ˆÃÌÀˆLṎœ˜œv«>ÃÃi˜}iÀà >œ˜}̅ii˜}̅œv>ÌÀ>ˆ˜°/…ˆÃVœÕ`LivÕÀ̅iÀ>ˆ`i`LÞVœœÕÀi`ˆ}…ÌÃÌÀˆ«Ã >LœÛi̅i«>ÌvœÀ“ˆ˜`ˆV>̈˜}VÀœÜ`ˆ˜}iÛiÃˆ˜i>V…V>Àœv>˜>««Àœ>V…ˆ˜} ÌÀ>ˆ˜]>ÈÃLiˆ˜}«>˜˜i`>Ì iÜ9œÀŽ½Ãœ˜}Ï>˜`,>ˆ,œ>`° 7…ˆiܓi˜iÜ"/À>˜ÃˆÌÃÌ>̈œ˜«ÀœiVÌÃ>ÀiÛiÀÞˆ“«ÀiÃÈÛiv>VˆˆÌˆiÃ] ̅iˆÀ…ˆ}…VœÃ̈ØœÌ>Ü>ÞØiViÃÃ>ÀÞpiëiVˆ>ÞvœÀÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã̅>Ì>Ài >˜ÌˆVˆ«>Ìi`̜…>ÛiÀi>̈ÛiÞ“œ`iÃÌÀˆ`iÀň«°/…iwÛi«Àœ«œÃi` ˆÌÞ œv/œÀœ˜ÌœÃÌ>̈œ˜Ãœ˜̅i"˜iÌܜÀŽ>Ài«>˜˜i`̜…>Ûi>˜>ÛiÀ>}i VœÃÌœvfÓΙ“ˆˆœ˜i>V…]iÝVÕ`ˆ˜}>``ˆÌˆœ˜>>“i˜ˆÌˆiψŽi«i`iÃÌÀˆ>˜ ˆ“«ÀœÛi“i˜ÌÃÀiµÕiÃÌi`LÞ̅i ˆÌÞ]܅ˆi̅i˜iÜ œœ“ˆ˜}̜˜"ÃÌ>̈œ˜ VœÃÌfnÓ“ˆˆœ˜°˜œ˜ÌÀi>]>ÀiVi˜ÌÞVœ“«iÌi`Vœ““ÕÌiÀÀ>ˆÃÌ>̈œ˜VœÃÌ f£{°Ó“ˆˆœ˜]£Ç܅ˆiˆ˜Ì>Þ]ÌÞ«ˆV>Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÃÌ>̈œ˜ÃVœÃÌLiÌÜii˜fΰn >˜`f™°Ó“ˆˆœ˜°Ƃ}ÀœÕ«œvÃiÛi˜Ìii˜˜iÜÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÃÌ>̈œ˜Ãˆ˜iÀ“>˜Þ >ÛiÀ>}i`fΰȣ“ˆˆœ˜>«ˆiVi°£n 6JGƂXGRTQRQUGF City of Toronto stations on the GO network are planned to have an average cost of $239 million each. In Montreal, a recently completed commuter rail station cost $14.2 million, while a group of seventeen new regional rail stations in Germany averaged $3.61 million apiece. 44- 125 - ADDITIONAL STATIONS /…iϜÜ>VViiÀ>̈œ˜œv"/À>˜ÃˆÌ½ÃVÕÀÀi˜ÌÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã“>ŽiÈ̈“«À>V̈V> ̜…>ÛivÀiµÕi˜ÌÃÌ>̈œ˜Ãˆ˜ÕÀL>˜>Ài>ψŽi>ÌÀÕiÀ>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÃiÀۈVi° œÀi“œ`iÀ˜ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã܈“>Ži>``ˆÌˆœ˜>ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ãvi>ÈLi]i˜…>˜Vˆ˜} >VViÃÃ̜œLÃ>˜`i˜>Lˆ˜}˜iÜ`iÛiœ«“i˜Ì°/…iÞ܈>Ãœ `iVœ˜}iÃÌ̅iV…œŽi«œˆ˜Ì>Ì1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜°,i}ˆœ˜>À>ˆœ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ã ˆ˜ ÕÀœ«i]ƂÈ>]>˜`ƂÕÃÌÀ>ˆ>}i˜iÀ>Þ…>Ûiv>À“œÀivÀiµÕi˜ÌÃ̜«Ã ̅>˜"/À>˜ÃˆÌˆ˜̅iÕÀL>˜VœÀi°ƂÌ̅iÛiÀޏi>ÃÌ]>ÃÌ>̈œ˜ŜՏ` >Ü>ÞÃLiLՈÌ܅iÀiˆ˜iȘÌiÀÃiVÌ܈̅LÕÃÞÃÕÀv>ViÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÀœÕÌiÃœÀ ˜i>ÀÈ}˜ˆwV>˜ÌVœ˜Vi˜ÌÀ>̈œ˜Ãœv`iÛiœ«“i˜Ì°ˆÛi˜̅iv>ÀLiÌÌiÀ «iÀvœÀ“>˜Viœv“œ`iÀ˜ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã]܅ˆV…ܜՏ`“i>˜̅>ÌiÛi˜܈̅̅i >``ˆÌˆœ˜œv˜iÜÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã]ÌÀ>Ûi̈“iÃܜՏ`Ã̈LiŜÀÌiÀ̅>˜̅iÞ>Ài ̜`>Þ°œÀiVœ˜ÃˆÃÌi˜ÌÃiÀۈVi«>ÌÌiÀ˜ÃܜՏ`>Ãœˆ“«ÀœÛiÀiˆ>LˆˆÌÞ] ܅ˆV…ܜՏ`ˆ˜ÌÕÀ˜“>ŽivœÀv>ÃÌiÀÌÀˆ«Ã̅ÀœÕ}…̅iÀi`ÕV̈œ˜œv >œÜ>˜VivœÀ`i>ÞȘ̅ï“iÌ>Li° /…i/ÀˆˆÕ“«>˜«Àœ«œÃiÃ>˜Õ“LiÀœvˆ˜wÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã]܅ˆV…}œ Liޜ˜`i݈Ã̈˜}", ,>˜`-“>ÀÌ/À>VŽ«>˜Ãˆ˜vœÃÌiÀˆ˜}ˆ˜Ìi}À>̈œ˜ ܈̅œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ>˜`œ««œÀÌ՘ˆÌˆiÃvœÀÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ‡œÀˆi˜Ìi`}ÀœÜ̅° œÌ>LÞ] ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã܈Li>``i`>œ˜}̅iÀ>ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀ>VÀœÃÃ̅i`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜VœÀi ̜LiÌÌiÀ`ˆÃÌÀˆLÕÌiœ>`Ã]ÃÕV…>Ã>Ì-«>`ˆ˜>]-…iÀLœÕÀ˜i]>˜` …iÀÀÞ° /À>ˆ˜ÃV>˜ÕÃiiÌÀœˆ˜Ý½Ã«>˜˜i` œ˜6>iޏ>ޜÛiÀv>VˆˆÌÞ̜ÌÕÀ˜ >ÀœÕ˜`]ˆ˜ÃÌi>`œv>ÞœÛiÀ]i˜>Lˆ˜}̅i>``ˆÌˆœ˜œvÃ̜«Ã>œ˜}̅i œ˜ 6>iÞ>Ì+Õii˜>˜`iÀÀ>À`]ˆ“«ÀœÛˆ˜}ÃiÀۈVi̜,ˆÛiÀ`>i>˜`,i}i˜Ì *>ÀŽ°Ƃ“œÀiÕÀL>˜Vœ˜Vi«ÌœvÃÌ>̈œ˜œV>̈œ˜ܜՏ`i˜…>˜Vi̅iÛ>Õi œv̅iÃÞÃÌi“]«>À̈VՏ>ÀÞ܈̅ˆ˜̅iÕÀL>˜VœÀi°/…iÃiÃÌ>̈œ˜«Àœ«œÃ>Ã >Ài`iÌ>ˆi`ˆ˜̅i>««i˜`ˆÝœv̅ˆÃ`œVՓi˜Ì° TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT 7…ˆi“œÃÌÀˆ`iÀÃœ˜>/ÀˆˆÕ“,i}ˆœ˜>,>ˆ iÌܜÀŽ܈ˆŽiÞÀi>V… ̅iˆÀÃÌ>̈œ˜ÃLÞVœ˜˜iV̈˜}LÕÃÀœÕÌiÃ]>Ãœ˜̅iÃÕLÕÀL>˜ÃÌÀiÌV…iÃœv ̅i// ÃÕLÜ>Þ]ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ‡œÀˆi˜Ìi``iÛiœ«“i˜Ì܈Ã̈Li>˜iÝVii˜Ì “i>˜Ãœv>Õ}“i˜Ìˆ˜}Àˆ`iÀň«>Ì>ÃÌ>̈œ˜܅ˆiÀ>ˆÃˆ˜}ÀiÛi˜Õi° 7…ˆi>`iÛiœ«“i˜Ì>ÀœÕ˜`̅i˜iÌܜÀŽ½ÃÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã܈Li`iÈÀ>Li] i“«œÞ“i˜Ì܈Liœv«>À̈VՏ>ÀLi˜iwÌ̜Àˆ`iÀň«°ˆÀÃ̏Þ]ˆÌˆÃ>Ü>Þ̜ }i˜iÀ>ÌiLˆ`ˆÀiV̈œ˜>ÌÀ>vwVœ˜ˆ˜iÃ]ˆ“«ÀœÛˆ˜}ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀiṎˆâ>̈œ˜° -iVœ˜`Þ]œvwVii“«œÞ“i˜Ì…>Ã…ˆ}…iÀ`i˜ÃˆÌÞ̅>˜ÀiÈ`i˜Ìˆ>]>ÃœvwVi LՈ`ˆ˜}ÃVœ˜Ì>ˆ˜“œÀi«iœ«i«iÀõÕ>ÀivœœÌ]>˜`̅iˆÀœVVÕ«>˜Ìà >Ài“œÀiˆŽiÞ̜Li“>Žˆ˜}Vœ““ÕÌiÀœÕÀ˜iÞð"/À>˜ÃˆÌVÕÀÀi˜ÌÞ …>Ã>VÀiÃœv«>ÀŽˆ˜}>ÀœÕ˜`“œÃÌœvˆÌÃÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã° Þňv̈˜}>VViÃÃ̜ ̅iÃÌ>̈œ˜«Àˆ“>ÀˆÞ̜ÃÕÀv>ViÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ̅ÀœÕ}…ˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`v>ÀiÃ>˜` ˆ˜VÀi>Ãi`vÀiµÕi˜VÞ]>ÃÜi>È“«ÀœÛˆ˜}«i`iÃÌÀˆ>˜>˜`VÞVˆ˜}>VViÃÃ] ˆÌ܈Li«œÃÈLi̜“œ˜ïâi“ÕV…œv̅>̏>˜`̅ÀœÕ}……ˆ}…`i˜ÃˆÌÞ `iÛiœ«“i˜Ì°œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌvii`ˆ˜}Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃV>˜v>VˆˆÌ>Ìi º“ˆÃȘ}“ˆ``i»`iÛiœ«“i˜Ì̅ÀœÕ}…œÕÌ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜° /…i/ÀˆˆÕ“«>˜«Àœ«œÃià ̅iÀi`iÛiœ«“i˜Ìœv "ÃÌ>̈œ˜«>ÀŽˆ˜}œÌà ܅iÀiÛiÀ«œÃÈLiˆ˜Ìœ `i˜Ãi]ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ‡œÀˆi˜Ìi` Vœ““Õ˜ˆÌˆið/…i ÀiÛi˜ÕiÃvÀœ“̅iÃi `iÛiœ«“i˜ÌÃV>˜Li «>À̏ÞÕÃi`̜`ivÀ>Þ ̅iVœÃÌœv̅i«ÀœiVÌ° Ƃ``ˆÌˆœ˜>ÃÌ>̈œ˜ÃŜՏ` LiœV>Ìi`>œ˜}ˆ˜iȘ >Ài>Ã̅>Ì>ÀiÜi‡ÃՈÌi` vœÀˆ˜Ìi˜ÃˆwV>̈œ˜° Regional rail operations in Europe, Asia, and Australia generally have far more frequent stops than GO Transit in the urban core. The Trillium plan proposes a PWODGTQHKPƂNN stations, which go beyond existing GO RER and Smart Track plans in fostering integration with local transit and opportunities for transit-oriented growth. CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 45- 126 - CASE STUDY Ottawa’s O-Train /…iÀiVœÀ`‡œÜw}ÕÀivœÀVœ˜ÃÌÀÕV̈œ˜VœÃÌÈÃ"ÌÌ>Ü>½Ã /ÀˆˆÕ“ˆ˜i]܅ˆV…VœÃÌœ˜ÞfÓ£“ˆˆœ˜ˆ˜Óää£vœÀ>˜ nŽ“ˆ˜i܈̅wÛiÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã°ÌÕÃi`>˜i݈Ã̈˜}]ˆ}…̏Þ ÕÃi`vÀiˆ}…ÌÀ>ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀ̜Vœ˜˜iVÌÌܜÃi}“i˜Ìà œv"ÌÌ>Ü>½Ã/À>˜ÃˆÌÜ>ÞLÕÃÀ>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÃÞÃÌi“܈̅ >Ài̜˜1˜ˆÛiÀÈÌÞ°“«i“i˜Ìi`>Ã>«ˆœÌ«ÀœiVÌ]ˆÌ ÕÃi`œvv‡Ì…i‡Ã…iv œ“L>À`ˆiÀ/>i˜Ì`ˆiÃi“Տ̈«i‡ ՘ˆÌÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã̅>ÌÜiÀi«>ÀÌœv>>À}iÀœÀ`iÀˆ˜iÀ“>˜Þ° ÌÜ>ÃLՈÌ>Ã>Ș}i‡ÌÀ>VŽÀœÕÌi]܈̅>Ș}i«>ÃȘ} ÌÀ>VŽ>Ì̅i“ˆ`«œˆ˜Ìœv̅iˆ˜i°/…ˆÃÜ>ÃÃÕvwVˆi˜Ì vœÀ>˜>‡`>ÞÃiÀۈViiÛiÀÞ£x“ˆ˜ÕÌiȘLœÌ… `ˆÀiV̈œ˜Ã°ÌÃÃÌ>̈œ˜ÃÜiÀiiÝÌÀ>œÀ`ˆ˜>ÀˆÞë>ÀÌ>˜] LÕÌ>`iµÕ>ÌivœÀ̅iˆÀ«ÕÀ«œÃi°/…i«>ÌvœÀ“ÃÜiÀi ȓ«Þ>ë…>Ì܈̅>LÕÃÅiÌiÀ]>˜`̈VŽiÌÃÜiÀi ܏`vÀœ“>Ài«ÕÀ«œÃi`«>ÀŽˆ˜}Ûi˜`ˆ˜}“>V…ˆ˜i° Ûi˜>ÃÕÀv>Viˆ}…ÌÀ>ˆÀœÕÌiˆ˜/œÀœ˜ÌœVœÃÌÃÌi˜Ãœv “ˆˆœ˜Ãœv`œ>ÀëiÀŽˆœ“iÌÀi°/…i"‡/À>ˆ˜“œ`i …>ÃiÝÌÀ>œÀ`ˆ˜>ÀÞ«œÌi˜Ìˆ>]iÛi˜̅œÕ}…ˆÌÃV>«>VˆÌÞ ˆÃˆŽiÞˆ˜>`iµÕ>ÌivœÀ“>œÀVœÀÀˆ`œÀȘ/œÀœ˜Ìœ°ƂÌ fÓ£“ˆˆœ˜vœÀÃÕV…>ÃÕLÃÌ>˜Ìˆ>«ÀœiVÌ]ˆÌܜՏ`Li vi>ÈLi̜µÕˆVŽÞ>˜`>vvœÀ`>LÞ>``À>ˆÀ>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ ÃiÀۈViœ˜ÃiVœ˜`>ÀÞÀœÕÌiÃ>˜`ˆ˜“>˜ÞÓ>iÀVˆÌˆià ܈̅Üi‡œV>Ìi`>˜`ˆ}…̏ÞÕÃi`À>ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀð The simple design of GO Transit’s Bloor Station is ideal for allowing passengers to get directly to the street from the platform, making connections to surface transit easier. Photo: Wylie Poon 46- 127 - NETWORK INTEGRATION Route Integration /œLi>Li̜ÃiÀÛi>Ã̅iL>VŽLœ˜iœv̅iÀi}ˆœ˜>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ˜iÌܜÀŽ] ˆÌˆÃiÃÃi˜Ìˆ>̅>ÌÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆLivՏÞˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`܈̅œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ° ÕÃÀœÕÌiÓÕÃÌLi`iÈ}˜i`]>˜`Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÃÌ>̈œ˜ÃÈÌÕ>Ìi`] ̜v>VˆˆÌ>Ìiˆ˜ÌiÀ“œ`>ÌÀ>˜ÃviÀðœÀiÝ>“«i]ˆ˜ÃÌi>`œvœV>̈˜} ÃÌ>̈œ˜ÃLi…ˆ˜`>VÀiÃœv«>ÀŽˆ˜}œÌÃ]>``ˆÌˆœ˜>ÃÌ>̈œ˜ÃVœÕ`Li `iÈ}˜i`܈̅`ˆÀiVÌ«i`iÃÌÀˆ>˜>VViÃÃ̜>˜`vÀœ“̅iÈ`iÜ>ŽÃ œv“>œÀ>ÀÌiÀˆ>Àœ>`Ã]“ˆ˜ˆ“ˆâˆ˜}̅i˜ii`vœÀLÕÃiÃ̜`ˆÛiÀÌ vÀœ“̅iˆÀÀœÕÌiœÀvœÀ«>ÃÃi˜}iÀÃ̜Ü>Žœ˜}`ˆÃÌ>˜ViÃ̜“>Ži ÌÀ>˜ÃviÀðœÀivÀiµÕi˜Ì]ÕÀL>˜‡ÃÌޏiÃ̜«ë>Vˆ˜}p«œÌi˜Ìˆ>Þ ܈̅ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ãë>Vi`>ÃVœÃi̜}i̅iÀ>ÃÃÕLÜ>ÞÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã܅i˜̅i VˆÀVՓÃÌ>˜ViÍÕÃ̈vÞˆÌpˆÃ«œÃÈLi܈̅v>ÃÌiÀ‡>VViiÀ>̈˜}“œ`iÀ˜ iiVÌÀˆV“Տ̈«i‡Õ˜ˆÌÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã°/…ˆÃ܈>Ãœ“ˆ˜ˆ“ˆâi̅i˜ii`vœÀ LÕÃiÃ̜`ˆÛiÀÌvÀœ“̅iˆÀ“œÃÌ`ˆÀiVÌÀœÕÌið-Ì>̈œ˜ÃŜՏ`>Ãœ Li`iÈ}˜i`̜ˆ˜Ìi}À>ÌiÃi>“iÃÏÞ܈̅œÌ…iÀ“œLˆˆÌÞ“œ`iÃ] ÃÕV…>Ã̅ÀœÕ}…̅iˆ˜VÕȜ˜œvLˆŽiÃ̜À>}i]ÃVœœÌiÀÃ]>˜`v>VˆˆÌˆià vœÀÀˆ`i‡…>ˆˆ˜}«ˆVŽÕ«>˜``Àœ«‡œvv°˜Ìi}À>̈œ˜܈̅œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ ܈>œÜ«iœ«i̜Ì>Ži>ŜÀÌLÕÃÌÀˆ«̜̅iÃÌ>̈œ˜>˜`̅i˜̅i ÌÀ>ˆ˜vœÀ̅iÀiÃÌœv̅iœÕÀ˜iÞ]À>̅iÀ̅>˜˜ii`ˆ˜}̜ÕÃi>ϜÜ œV>LÕÃvœÀ̅ii˜ÌˆÀiÌÞœvœ˜}œÕÀ˜iÞð/À>ˆ˜ÃV>˜«ÀœÛˆ`iÀi>‡ ̈“iˆ˜vœÀ“>̈œ˜>LœÕÌVœ˜˜iV̈˜}ÀœÕÌiÃ>ÌÕ«Vœ“ˆ˜}ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã° ƂÃ>«>ÀÌœv̅iLÀœ>`iÀˆ˜w ÃÌ>̈œ˜«Àœ«œÃ>]̅i/ÀˆˆÕ“ «>˜«Àœ«œÃiÃ̅i>``ˆÌˆœ˜ œvÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã>Ì>“>œÀ>ÀÌiÀˆ> ˆ˜ÌiÀÃiV̈œ˜Ã̅>Ì>ÀiÃiÀÛi` LÞ>“>œÀLÕÃÀœÕÌiˆ˜œÀ`iÀ ̜v>VˆˆÌ>ÌiVœ˜˜iV̈œ˜Ã>˜` i˜>Li˜iÌܜÀŽˆ˜Ìi}À>̈œ˜°Ì >Ãœ«Àœ«œÃiÃ̅i>`œ«Ìˆœ˜œv ÕÀL>˜Ã̜«ë>Vˆ˜}܈̅ˆ˜̅i /œÀœ˜Ìœ`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜VœÀi]܈̅̅i >``ˆÌˆœ˜œvÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã>Ì-«>`ˆ˜>] -…iÀLœÕÀ˜i] >ÃÌ>ÀLœÕÀ­ÜˆÌ… Vœ˜˜iV̈œ˜̜̅i"˜Ì>Àˆœˆ˜i®] >˜`>ÃÌ>̈œ˜vœÀܓiÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã >œ˜}܈̅>ÌÕÀ˜>ÀœÕ˜`v>VˆˆÌÞ >Ì …iÀÀÞ-ÌÀiiÌ̜ÃiÀÛi̅i *œÀÌ>˜`ð/…ˆÃÃ̜«ë>Vˆ˜} ܈…i«̜Ài‡œÀˆi˜Ì`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜ `iÛiœ«“i˜Ìœ˜>˜i>Ã̇ÜiÃÌ >݈Ã]՘œVŽˆ˜}՘`iÀÃiÀÛi` `iÛiœ«“i˜Ì>˜`Ã>œ˜}̅i Ü>ÌiÀvÀœ˜Ìp«>À̈VՏ>ÀÞvœÀ˜iÜ i“«œÞ“i˜Ì°/…i˜iÜÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã ܈>ÃœÃiÀÛi̅iiÃÃi˜Ìˆ>Àœi œvÀiˆiۈ˜}Vœ˜}iÃ̈œ˜>Ì1˜ˆœ˜ -Ì>̈œ˜LÞëÀi>`ˆ˜}ÌÀ>vwV̜ ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜½ÃVœÀiœÛiÀ“Տ̈«i ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã°*>ÃÃi˜}iÀÃVœ˜˜iV̈˜} LiÌÜii˜VœÀÀˆ`œÀÃVœÕ`Li i˜VœÕÀ>}i`̜`œÜ>Ì̅iÃi ÃÌ>̈œ˜ÃÀ>̅iÀ̅>˜>Ì1˜ˆœ˜] vÕÀ̅iÀÀi`ÕVˆ˜}«ÀiÃÃÕÀiœ˜̅i ÃÞÃÌi“½ÃLÕÈiÃÌÃÌ>̈œ˜° The area served by regional rail is vastly lower without full integration with local transit. CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 47- 128 - /…i/ÀˆˆÕ“«>˜ «Àœ«œÃiÃ̅ivՏ ˆ˜Ìi}À>̈œ˜œvÀi}ˆœ˜> À>ˆˆ˜Ìœ̅iœV> ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌv>ÀiÃÞÃÌi“] >Ã`ˆÃVÕÃÃi`ˆ˜̅i «ÀiۈœÕÃÀi«œÀÌ] Erasing the Invisible Line°>ÀiVœiV̈œ˜ ܜՏ`Vœ˜Ìˆ˜Õi̜ÕÃi "/À>˜ÃˆÌ½Ã«Àœœv‡œv‡ «>ޓi˜ÌÃÞÃÌi“°>Àià ܜՏ`“>ÌV…œV> ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌv>ÀiÃ]܈̅œ˜}iÀ `ˆÃÌ>˜ViÌÀˆ«ÃÃÕLiVÌ ̜✘i‡L>Ãi`ˆ˜VÀi>Ãi >VVœÀ`ˆ˜}̜`ˆÃÌ>˜Vi ÌÀ>Ûii`°v`iÈÀi`] ̅iœ˜}iÃÌ`ˆÃÌ>˜Vi ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã]̜`iÃ̈˜>̈œ˜Ã ˆŽiˆÌV…i˜iÀ] >ÀÀˆi] >˜` ˆ>}>À>]VœÕ`œvviÀ ÀiÃiÀÛi`Ãi>̈˜}vœÀ> ÃÕ««i“i˜Ì>ÀÞv>Ài° ÀˆÌˆV>Þ]>``ˆÌˆœ˜>`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã>Ài˜ii`i`LœÌ…̜ÀiˆiÛi «ÀiÃÃÕÀiœ˜1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜>˜`̜ÃiÀÛi>``ˆÌˆœ˜>`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜`iÛiœ«“i˜Ì° œÀiÝ>“«i]>Ì̅iÌÞ«ˆV>Ã̜«ë>Vˆ˜}œv̅i iÀˆ˜-‡ >…˜]̅iÀiܜՏ` LivœÕÀœÀwÛiÃÌ>̈œ˜ÃLiÌÜii˜̅i ݅ˆLˆÌˆœ˜>˜`̅i œ˜,ˆÛiÀ°7ˆÌ… >ÃÌ>̈œ˜LiÌÜii˜-«>`ˆ˜>>˜` >̅ÕÀÃÌ]>ÃÜi>ëœÃÈLiÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã>Ì >ÀۈÃÉ-…iÀLœÕÀ˜i>˜`]vœÀܓiÃiÀۈViÃ] …iÀÀÞ]̅iÃÞÃÌi“܈“ÕV… LiÌÌiÀ`ˆÃÌÀˆLÕÌiÀˆ`iÀÃ>ÀœÕ˜`̅i`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜VœÀi]Ài`ÕVi«ÀiÃÃÕÀiœ˜ 1˜ˆœ˜]>˜`«ÀœÛˆ`iÀ>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ̜`iÛiœ«ˆ˜}>Ài>Ãœv̅iÜ>ÌiÀvÀœ˜Ì>˜` œÌ…iÀ`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜˜iˆ}…LœÕÀ…œœ`ð-Ì>̈œ˜Ã>Ì >ÃÌ>ÀLœÕÀ>˜` ݅ˆLˆÌˆœ˜ ˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`܈̅̅i"˜Ì>Àˆœˆ˜i܈i˜>Li>˜i>Ã̇ÜiÃÌ}Àˆ`œvÀ>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ >VÀœÃÃ̅i`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜VœÀi°/…œÃi…i>`i`̜̅iÜÕ̅iÀ˜i˜`œv`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜ VœÕ`Ã܈ÌV…vÀœ“̅i"˜Ì>Àˆœˆ˜i̜Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ>Ì >ÃÌ>ÀLœÕÀ°/…œÃiœ˜ Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆLœÕ˜`vœÀ̅i˜œÀ̅iÀ˜>Ài>Ãœv`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜VœÕ`Ã܈ÌV…̜̅i "˜Ì>Àˆœˆ˜i>Ì ݅ˆLˆÌˆœ˜œÀ >ÃÌ>ÀLœÕÀ]ŜÀÌi˜ˆ˜}œÕÀ˜iÞÃ>˜``ˆÛiÀ̈˜} «>ÃÃi˜}iÀÃ>Ü>ÞvÀœ“1˜ˆœ˜° Fare Policy ,i}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ“ÕÃÌ>ÃœÅ>Ài̅iÃ>“iv>ÀiÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi>ÏœV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÃiÀۈVið /…ˆÃˆÃ>˜>««Àœ>V…vœœÜi`LÞ˜i>ÀÞ>ÃÕVViÃÃvՏÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÃÞÃÌi“ð *>ÀˆÃ½, ,>˜`-‡ >…˜Ãˆ˜iÀ“>˜VˆÌˆiÃ>Å>Ài̅iÃ>“iv>ÀiÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi >ÃiÌÀœÉ1‡ >…˜ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã]>ÃÜi>ÓœÃÌLÕÃÀœÕÌiðœ˜`œ˜½Ã ÀœÃÃÀ>ˆ܈ ÕÃi̅iÃ>“iv>ÀiÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi>Ã̅i/ÕLi°Ƃ˜ˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`v>ÀiÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi܈̅ œV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ]>˜`«œÌi˜Ìˆ>Þ܈̅œÌ…iÀÀi}ˆœ˜>œ«iÀ>̜ÀÃ]܈i˜>Li̅i ňvÌ̜Ü>À`“œLˆˆÌÞ>Ã>ÃiÀۈVi°"/À>˜ÃˆÌ>Ài>`ÞvœœÜÃ̅i}œL>LiÃÌ «À>V̈ViLÞÕȘ}̅i«Àœœv‡œv‡«>ޓi˜Ì“œ`ivœÀv>ÀiVœiV̈œ˜]܅ˆV…ŜՏ` Li“>ˆ˜Ì>ˆ˜i`ˆ˜>˜ÞÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÃÞÃÌi“°>ÌiÃVœÕ`Liˆ˜ÃÌ>i`>Ì1˜ˆœ˜ -Ì>̈œ˜]ˆv`iÈÀi`]܅ˆiœÌ…iÀÃÌ>̈œ˜ÃÀi“>ˆ˜œ«i˜‡>VViÃðƂ˜Þœ˜i܅œv>ˆÃ ̜«>Þ>v>Ài>Ì̅iˆÀÃÌ>̈œ˜ܜՏ`LiV>Õ}…̈v̅iˆÀ`iÃ̈˜>̈œ˜ˆÃ1˜ˆœ˜] >˜`ˆÌܜՏ`>œÜÀˆ`iÀÃ̜ÌÀ>˜ÃviÀLiÌÜii˜/ÀˆˆÕ“>˜`̅iÃÕLÜ>Þ܈̅œÕÌ ˜ii`ˆ˜}̜«>ÃÃ̅ÀœÕ}…>v>Ài}>Ìip>ÃÃՓˆ˜}>vՏÞˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`v>ÀiÃÞÃÌi“° >ÀiÀi>`iÀÃ>Ì>ÃÌ>̈œ˜ÃŜՏ`>ÃœLi«>Vi`œ˜̅i˜œÀ“>Ü>Žˆ˜}«>̅ ̜̅i«>ÌvœÀ“]œ˜>ˆ˜i̅>̈È“«œÃÈLi̜“ˆÃ폈Žiœ˜̅iÃÕLÜ>Þ®]À>̅iÀ ̅>˜Liˆ˜}«œÃˆÌˆœ˜i`՘œLÌÀÕÈÛiÞœ˜̅iÈ`i°Ƃ˜ˆ˜Ìi}À>Ìi`v>Ài«œˆVÞ V>˜ˆ˜VÕ`i>Û>ÀˆiÌÞœvÜVˆ>v>ÀiÃ]ÃÕV…>ÃvœÀ«iœ«i܈̅œÜˆ˜Vœ“ið˜ iÀ“>˜Þ]vœÀiÝ>“«i]œ«iÀ>̜ÀÃi˜>Li…œ`iÀÃœv>“œ˜Ì…Þ«>ÃÃ̜ÌÀ>Ûi ܈̅̅iˆÀv>“ˆˆiÃ>̘œ>``ˆÌˆœ˜>V…>À}iœ˜ÜiiŽi˜`ð 48- 129 - Infrastructure /…i˜i܈˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi˜ii`i`vœÀÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆˆÃÀi“>ÀŽ>LÞ Ó>p˜œÃÕLÜ>ÞÌ՘˜iÃ]˜œiÝ«i˜ÃˆÛi՘`iÀ}ÀœÕ˜`ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ã] ˜œ՘È}…̏ÞiiÛ>Ìi`ۈ>`ÕVÌðƂ̅>̈Øii`i`>ÀiܓiÀœ>`‡ À>ˆ>˜`À>ˆ‡À>ˆ}À>`iÃi«>À>̈œ˜Ã]>``ˆÌˆœ˜>ÌÀ>VŽÃˆ˜ÃiiVÌ «>ViÃ]>˜`>À>`ˆV>Þȓ«ˆwi`ÀœÕÌiÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi̅>Ì“ˆ˜ˆ“ˆâià Vœ˜yˆVÌð ÞVœ“Lˆ˜ˆ˜}ÀœÕÌiÃœ˜̅ii>ÃÌ>˜`ÜiÃÌœv̅iÀi}ˆœ˜ ˆ˜ÌœȘ}iVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ>˜`ÌÕÀ˜ˆ˜}ÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃœÕÌÈ`i̅i`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜ VœÀi]ˆÌˆÃ«œÃÈLi̜“>݈“ˆâiV>«>VˆÌÞ̅ÀœÕ}…1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜° /…iˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀiܜՏ`Li`iÈ}˜i`vœÀvÕÌÕÀiiÝ«>˜Ãˆœ˜>˜`̅i >``ˆÌˆœ˜œvÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÃiÀۈViœ˜œÌ…iÀVœÀÀˆ`œÀð The new infrastructure needed for regional rail is remarkably small—no subway tunnels, no expensive underground stations, no unsightly elevated lines. Allandale Waterfront Newmarket Aurora Highway 7 Downsview Park Eglinton Caledonia Spadina Union Cherry Lincolnville Mount Joy Pearson Niagara Milton Mount Pleasant WoodbineKitchener Central ExhibitionPort CreditOakville EastHarbour Scarborough HamiltonCentral Pickering Trillium Future Service 12 10 11 T4 T5 T7T1 Route ;v1ubrঞomķ_;-7‰-‹Őr;-hņo@r;-hő Hamilton to Oshawa, express, 10/10 Niagara to Bowmanville, express, 30/30 Oakville to Pickering, local, 10/10 Kitchener to Cherry, express, 20/20 Cambridge to Cherry, express, 20/20 Pearson to Morningside Heights, local, 10/10 Allendale Waterfront to Cherry, express, 20/20 Newmarket Main Street to Cherry, local, 10/10 Milton to Lincolnville, local, 5/10Some trains to/from Mount Joy, all times Bloor This map shows the TRBOT’s proposal for Trillium service. All key stops are labeled, with other stops shown as smaller dots. T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T4 T4 T5 T6 T6 T4 T5 T6 T9 T9 T4 T5 T6 T4 T5 T6 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T7 T8 T7 T8 T7 T8 T7 T8 T7 T8T9 T9 T1 T2 T3 T9 T1 T2 T3 T2 T3T1 T2 T310T1T2 T310T1 T2 T310T1 T2 T3T1T2 T3T1T2 T3T1 T2 10T1 Oshawa T210T1 Woodbridge T11 T7 T8T9T11 T7 T8T9T11 T11 T11 Gormley 0D\ĆHOG Morningside Heights Bowmanville Milwood T5T6SymingtonT7 T8 Woodbridge to Gormley, local, 10/10T11 0D\ĆHOGWR0RUQLQJVLGH+HLJKWVORFDOT10 Junction T4 T5 T6 T11T10 T10 T10 T11 T5T6T10 T2 T10 T11 T9 T9 Square One T4 T5T9T10 Cambridge T5 Agincourt T5T6T10T9 Brampton T4 T5 T5T10 Trillium Future Service ƂiÝ«ÀiÃÃ>˜`ÌiÀ“ˆ˜>Ã̜«Ã>Ài>Lii`]܈̅ œV>Ã̜«ÃŜܘÃ>ÃÓ>iÀ`œÌÃœ˜̅i /œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜ œ>À`œv/À>`i½Ã«Àœ«œÃ>vœÀ /ÀˆˆÕ“-iÀۈVi° 7ˆÌ…>``ˆÌˆœ˜>ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀiˆ˜vÀiˆ}…ÌÀ>ˆ VœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ]œÀ̅iÀiœV>̈œ˜œvvÀiˆ}…ÌÌÀ>vwV]> Vœ˜Ãˆ`iÀ>LÞ“œÀi>“LˆÌˆœÕÃÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ ˜iÌܜÀŽVœÕ`Liˆ“«i“i˜Ìi`ˆ˜̅iœ˜}ÌiÀ“° CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 49- 130 - The Value of the Milton Corridor /…iˆÌœ˜ œÀÀˆ`œÀ…>Ã>À}Õ>LÞ“œÀiÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ«œÌi˜Ìˆ>̅>˜>˜Þ œÌ…iÀȘ}iVœÀÀˆ`œÀˆ˜̅i"˜iÌܜÀŽ°Ì«ÀœÛˆ`iÃ>v>ÃÌÃiÀۈVivÀœ“ `œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜/œÀœ˜Ìœ̜ ̜LˆVœŽi]ˆÃÈÃÃ>Õ}>]>˜`ˆÌœ˜°ÌܜՏ` >ÃœÃiÀÛi>Ã>Vœ˜Ûi˜ˆi˜Ìi>Ã̇ÜiÃ̺ÃÕLÜ>Þ»vœÀ̅iÃiVœ˜`‡>À}iÃÌ “Õ˜ˆVˆ«>ˆÌÞˆ˜̅i/Ƃ]VÀi>̈˜}>˜¼8½‡Ã…>«i`À>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ˜iÌܜÀŽ ܅i˜Vœ“Lˆ˜i`܈̅̅i/À>˜ÃˆÌÜ>Þ°/…iVœÀÀˆ`œÀ]…œÜiÛiÀ]ˆÃVÕÀÀi˜ÌÞ ÕÃi`>à >˜>`ˆ>˜*>VˆwV½Ã“>ˆ˜vÀiˆ}…ÌÀœÕÌi̅ÀœÕ}…̅iÀi}ˆœ˜° ˆÛi˜ˆÌÈ“«œÀÌ>˜Vi̜̅iÀi}ˆœ˜½ÃiVœ˜œ“Þ>Ã>}œœ`ÓœÛi“i˜Ì Vœ˜`ՈÌ]̅ˆÃÀœi“ÕÃÌLi>VVœ““œ`>Ìi`>˜`>˜Þ«>˜vœÀÀi}ˆœ˜> À>ˆ`iÛiœ«i`̅ÀœÕ}…Vœ>LœÀ>̈œ˜LiÌÜii˜}œÛiÀ˜“i˜Ì>˜` *°Ì “>ÞLi«œÃÈLi̜>``>``ˆÌˆœ˜>ÌÀ>VŽÃˆ˜̅iVœÀÀˆ`œÀvœÀ«>ÃÃi˜}iÀ ÃiÀۈVi]œÀ̜ňvÌvÀiˆ}…ÌÃiÀۈViiÃi܅iÀi°-ˆ˜ViLՈ`ˆ˜}̅iˆÌœ˜ VœÀÀˆ`œÀvÀœ“ÃVÀ>ÌV…]ˆvˆÌ`ˆ`˜œÌi݈ÃÌ]ܜՏ`VœÃÌfÎÇ°xLˆˆœ˜>Ì VÕÀÀi˜ÌÀ>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌVœ˜ÃÌÀÕV̈œ˜VœÃÌÃ]w˜`ˆ˜}Ü>ÞÃ̜“>ŽiÕÃiœv ̅ii݈Ã̈˜}VœÀÀˆ`œÀܜՏ`Lii˜œÀ“œÕÏÞÛ>Õ>Li°/…i/ÀˆˆÕ“«>˜ «Àœ«œÃiÃÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆÃiÀۈViœ˜̅ˆÃŽiÞVœÀÀˆ`œÀ]܈̅Vœ“«i˜Ã>̈œ˜̜ *>˜`>``ˆÌˆœ˜>ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi̜i˜ÃÕÀi˜œœÃÃœvvÀiˆ}…ÌV>«>VˆÌÞ° The addition of regional rail service on the /KNVQPEQTTKFQTUKIPKƂECPVN[KORTQXGUCEEGUU to much of Mississauga. 50- 131 - T…ˆÃˆÃÕÃÌ̅iLi}ˆ˜˜ˆ˜}œv̅i“>˜Þ«œÃÈLˆˆÌˆiÃvœÀ Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆˆ˜̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜°/…iÀi>ÀiÃiÛiÀ> >``ˆÌˆœ˜>VœÀÀˆ`œÀÃ̅>ÌVœÕ`LiÕÃi`vœÀÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆˆ˜ œÀ`iÀ̜VÀi>Ìi>ÌÀՏÞVœ“«Ài…i˜ÃˆÛiÀ>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ˜iÌܜÀŽ° œÀiÝ>“«i] *½ÃVÕÀÀi˜ÌvÀiˆ}…ÌÀœÕÌi>VÀœÃÃ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜ˆ˜ŽÃ ˆÌœ˜]Vi˜ÌÀ>ˆÃÈÃÃ>Õ}>]Vi˜ÌÀ> ̜LˆVœŽi]ˆ`̜ܘ/œÀœ˜Ìœ] ̅i œ˜ˆÃÉ }ˆ˜Ìœ˜>Ài>]Ƃ}ˆ˜VœÕÀÌ]>ÛiÀ˜]>˜`iÛi˜̜̅i vÕÌÕÀi`iÛiœ«“i˜Ì>Ài>ˆ˜-i>̜˜°ÌVœÕ`«ÀœÛˆ`i>˜iÝ«ÀiÃà ÀœÕÌi>VÀœÃÃ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜̅>ÌܜՏ`“>Ži“>˜Þi>Ã̇ÜiÃÌÌÀˆ«Ãv>ÃÌiÀ] ÀiˆiÛi̅i œœÀ‡ >˜vœÀ̅ÃÕLÜ>Þ]>˜`Ì>Ži«ÀiÃÃÕÀiœvv̅i1˜ˆœ˜ -Ì>̈œ˜VœÀÀˆ`œÀ°ÌܜՏ`>Ãœˆ“«ÀœÛi̅iÛ>Õiœv̅i,ˆV…“œ˜` ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀLÞi˜>Lˆ˜}>“œÀi`ˆÀiVÌÀœṎ˜}>˜`«œÌi˜Ìˆ>"˜Ì>Àˆœ ˆ˜iVœ˜˜iV̈œ˜° iÀÌ>ˆ˜Þ] *½Ã˜ii`ÓÕÃÌLiV>ÀivՏÞÌ>Ži˜ˆ˜Ìœ >VVœÕ˜Ìˆ˜>˜ÞÃÕV…“i>ÃÕÀip“œÛi“i˜Ìœv}œœ`Ș̅iÀi}ˆœ˜ ˆÃÕÃÌ>È“«œÀÌ>˜Ì>Ã̅i“œÛi“i˜Ìœv«>ÃÃi˜}iÀð-ÕV…>ÇnŽ“ VœÀÀˆ`œÀܜՏ`VœÃÌfxn°xLˆˆœ˜̜Ài«ˆV>Ìi>Ã>ÃÕLÜ>Þ>ÌÌÞ«ˆV> Vœ˜ÃÌÀÕV̈œ˜VœÃÌÃ]܈ÌܜՏ`˜œÌLi՘Ài>ܘ>Li̜«ÀœÛˆ`i * ܈̅˜ii`i`Vœ“«i˜Ã>̈œ˜vœÀ̅i“̜>VVi«Ì̅iV…>˜}i̜̅iˆÀ œ«iÀ>̈œ˜Ã>˜`vÀiiÕ«œÀ>``>``ˆÌˆœ˜>V>«>VˆÌÞœ˜̅iVœÀÀˆ`œÀ° "̅iÀˆ˜iÃ̅>ÌVœÕ`LiÕÃi`ivviV̈ÛiÞvœÀÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆˆ˜̅i œ˜}iÀÌiÀ“ܜՏ`Li *½ÃVœÀÀˆ`œÀ̅ÀœÕ}…˜œÀ̅iÀ˜ ̜LˆVœŽi̜ 7œœ`LÀˆ`}i>˜` œÌœ˜]>˜`̅i˜œÀ̅‡ÃœÕ̅À>ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀ]œÜ˜i` LÞ̅i/œÜ˜œv"À>˜}iۈi]̅ÀœÕ}…*ii,i}ˆœ˜iÝÌi˜`ˆ˜}vÀœ“ -ÌÀiiÌÃۈi̅ÀœÕ}…̅ii>`œÜÛ>iLÕȘiÃë>ÀŽ>˜``œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜ À>“«Ìœ˜̜˜œÀ̅ À>“«Ìœ˜°/…i>ÌÌiÀܜՏ`ÃiÀÛiœ˜iœv̅i v>ÃÌiÃ̇}ÀœÜˆ˜}>Ài>Ãœv̅iÀi}ˆœ˜>˜`«ÀœÛˆ`i>À>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ ÃÕ««i“i˜Ì̜̅i/Ƃ7iÃÌ…ˆ}…Ü>Þ°˜>V>ÃiÃ]ˆÌܜՏ`Li iÃÃi˜Ìˆ>̜i˜ÃÕÀi̅>ÌÃÕvwVˆi˜ÌV>«>VˆÌÞ]œÀ>ÌiÀ˜>̈ÛiÀœÕÌiÃ] ÜiÀi>Û>ˆ>LivœÀvÀiˆ}…ÌÃiÀۈVi° Conclusion and Future Possibilities CP’s current freight route across the region links Milton, central Mississauga, central Etobicoke, Midtown Toronto, the Don Mills/Eglinton area, Agincourt, Malvern, and even to the future development area in Seaton. It could provide an express route across the region that would make many east-west trips faster, relieve the Bloor- Danforth subway, and take pressure off the Union Station corridor. CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 51- 132 - "˜Vi>À>ˆˆ˜iœ«iÀ>ÌiÓœÀivÀiµÕi˜ÌÞ̅>˜ >L>ÈVVœ““ÕÌiÀÃiÀۈVi]ˆÌLiVœ“iÃVœÃ̇ ivviV̈Ûi̜Vœ˜Ãˆ`iÀLՈ`ˆ˜}ŜÀÌ`ˆÛiÀȜ˜Ã>˜` ëÕÀÃvÀœ“̅iˆ˜i̜ÃiÀÛi“>œÀ`iÃ̈˜>̈œ˜ÃœÀ ˜iÜ`iÛiœ«“i˜ÌðœÀiÝ>“«i]̅iˆÌV…i˜iÀ VœÀÀˆ`œÀ«>ÃÃiÃÛiÀÞ˜i>À̜*i>ÀܘƂˆÀ«œÀÌ°vˆÌ ÜiÀi̜Li`ˆÛiÀÌi`̜`ˆÀiV̏ÞÃiÀÛi̅i>ˆÀ«œÀÌ ÌiÀ“ˆ˜>>˜`ˆ˜Ž܈̅̅i }ˆ˜Ìœ˜ ÀœÃÃ̜ܘ>˜` œÌ…iÀœV>ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi]ˆÌVœÕ`LiVœ“i >ÌÀÕiº1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜7iÃÌ°»/…ˆÃVœÕ`LiVœ“i ̅i«Àˆ“>ÀÞÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ…ÕLœv̅iƂˆÀ«œÀÌ “«œÞ“i˜Ì <œ˜ip̅iÃiVœ˜`‡>À}iÃÌVœ˜Vi˜ÌÀ>̈œ˜œv i“«œÞ“i˜Ìˆ˜ >˜>`>pvÀœ“܅ˆV…œÌ…iÀœV> ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌÃiÀۈViÃVœÕ`À>`ˆ>Ìi̜ÃiÀÛi̅ii˜ÌˆÀi `ˆÃÌÀˆVÌ°ÌVœÕ`vÕÀ̅iÀ“œÀiÃiÀÛi>Ã>ŽiÞVi˜ÌÀi vœÀ`iÛiœ«“i˜Ì]>˜`iÛi˜Liˆ˜Ži`LÞ6Ƃ ,>ˆ½Ã«Àœ«œÃi`ˆ}…‡ÀiµÕi˜VÞ,>ˆ«ÀœiVÌ܈̅ "ÌÌ>Ü>>˜`œ˜ÌÀi>° POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITY Orangeville Brampton Railway /…i"À>˜}iۈi‡ À>“«Ìœ˜,>ˆÜ>ÞˆÃ>À>ˆ VœÀÀˆ`œÀ̅>̏ˆ˜ŽÃ"À>˜}iۈi܈̅ À>“«Ìœ˜ >˜`̅iˆÌœ˜ œÀÀˆ`œÀˆ˜ˆÃÈÃÃ>Õ}>°/œ`>Þ >vÀiˆ}…̇œ˜ÞÀœÕÌiœÜ˜i`LÞ̅i/œÜ˜œv "À>˜}iۈi]̅iˆ˜iˆÃVÕÀÀi˜ÌÞ>ÌÀˆÃŽœv >L>˜`œ˜“i˜Ì`Õi̜ÌÀ>vwVœÃÃið̈ÃVÀˆÌˆV>̅>Ì ̅ˆÃVœÀÀˆ`œÀLi«ÀiÃiÀÛi`]…œÜiÛiÀ\>˜iÝÌi˜Ãˆœ˜ œv̅iÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ˜iÌܜÀŽœÛiÀ̅iˆ˜iVœÕ` È}˜ˆwV>˜ÌÞˆ˜VÀi>ÃiVœ˜˜iV̈ۈÌÞ܈̅ˆ˜̅i™äx Ài}ˆœ˜]ÃÕ««œÀ̈˜}ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ‡œÀˆi˜Ìi`}ÀœÜ̅>˜` ëii`ˆ˜}ÌÀ>Ûi° ˜̅iŜÀÌiÀÌiÀ“]ˆÌVœÕ`Li `iÛiœ«i`>ë>ÀÌœv>˜"‡/À>ˆ˜‡ÃÌޏiÃiÀۈVi Vœ˜˜iV̈˜}ˆÃÈÃÃ>Õ}>>˜` À>“«Ìœ˜°˜̅i œ˜}iÀÌiÀ“]ˆÌVœÕ`v՘V̈œ˜>Ã>ÕÃivՏLÀ>˜V…œv >«œÌi˜Ìˆ>/ÀˆˆÕ“ÃiÀۈViœ˜̅iˆÌœ˜VœÀÀˆ`œÀ° The Orangeville-Brampton Railway corridor could be used as a north-south regional rail corridor connecting Brampton with the Meadowvale business park and central Mississauga. Potential Ultimate Trillium Network Orangeville-Brampton Rail Corridor 52- 133 - POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITY Port Lands /…i`iÛiœ«“i˜ÌVÕÀÀi˜ÌÞ՘`iÀÜ>Þˆ˜ ̅i*œÀÌ>˜`Ã܈>``Ìi˜Ãœv̅œÕÃ>˜`à œvÀˆ`iÀÃ̜/œÀœ˜Ìœ½ÃÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ˜iÌܜÀŽˆ˜ ̅iVœ“ˆ˜}Þi>Àð ÕÀÀi˜Ì«>˜Ã…œ` ̅>Ì̅iÃiÀˆ`iÀÃLi…>˜`i`«Àˆ“>ÀˆÞۈ> iÝÌi˜Ãˆœ˜Ãœv̅i// ÃÌÀiiÌV>À˜iÌܜÀŽ ˆ˜Ìœ̅i˜iܘiˆ}…LœÀ…œœ`]܈̅ÃiÀۈVià vii`ˆ˜}>˜iÝ«>˜`i`ÌiÀ“ˆ˜>>Ì1˜ˆœ˜ -Ì>̈œ˜°7…ˆiÃÌÀiiÌV>ÀÃiÀۈVi܈Li iÃÃi˜Ìˆ>vœÀœV>VˆÀVՏ>̈œ˜ˆ˜̅i*œÀÌ >˜`Ã]>ŜÀÌiÝÌi˜Ãˆœ˜œv̅iÀi}ˆœ˜> À>ˆ˜iÌܜÀŽ“>ÞLi>Li̜`iˆÛiÀ“œÀi V>«>VˆÌÞ>˜`LiÌÌiÀÀi}ˆœ˜>Vœ˜˜iV̈ۈÌÞ ̜̅iLÕÀ}iœ˜ˆ˜}˜iˆ}…LœÀ…œœ`° ˆ}}ˆ˜}>VÕ̇>˜`‡VœÛiÀÌ՘˜ivÀœ“ ̅i1˜ˆœ˜-Ì>̈œ˜,>ˆ œÀÀˆ`œÀˆ˜Ìœ̅i *œÀÌ>˜`ÃܜՏ`>œÜÌÀ>ˆ˜ÃÏ>Ìi`̜ ÌiÀ“ˆ˜>Ìi>Ì …iÀÀÞ-ÌÀiï˜̅i/ÀˆˆÕ“ «>˜̜ˆ˜ÃÌi>`ÌiÀ“ˆ˜>Ìiˆ˜̅i*œÀÌ >˜`ð/…ˆÃܜՏ`ˆ˜VÀi>ÃiiµÕˆ«“i˜Ì ÕÃiˆ˜̅i˜iÌܜÀŽ]܅ˆi«ÀœÛˆ`ˆ˜}…ˆ}…‡ ëii`]…ˆ}…‡V>«>VˆÌÞÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ̜̅i˜iÜ ˜iˆ}…LœÀ…œœ`° v̅iˆÌœ˜ˆ˜iÜiÀi̜œ«iÀ>Ìi>vՏÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ ÃiÀۈVi]>ŜÀÌÌ՘˜i̅ÀœÕ}…̅iˆÃÈÃÃ>Õ}> ˆÌÞ i˜ÌÀi ܜՏ`ÃiÀÛi̅i“>œÀ`iÛiœ«“i˜ÌÃ՘`iÀÜ>Þˆ˜̅i>Ài>] ̅iVˆÌ޽Ó>ˆ˜LÕÃ…ÕL]>˜`>Vœ˜˜iV̈œ˜̜̅iˆÃÈÃÃ>Õ}> /À>˜ÃˆÌÜ>Þ°ÌܜՏ`ivwVˆi˜ÌÞˆ˜Ž̅i“܈̅…œ“iÃ>˜` i“«œÞ“i˜Ì>Ài>Ã>VÀœÃÈÃÈÃÃ>Õ}>]ˆÌœ˜]>˜`/œÀœ˜Ìœ‡ ‡˜œÌ̜“i˜Ìˆœ˜i˜>Lˆ˜}ÌÀˆ«ÃvÀœ“-µÕ>Ài"˜i̜1˜ˆœ˜ -Ì>̈œ˜ˆ˜Ón“ˆ˜ÕÌiðÕV…œv̅i`ˆÛiÀȜ˜VœÕ`Li iVœ˜œ“ˆV>ÞLՈÌœ˜̅iÃÕÀv>Viˆ˜̅iÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌVœÀÀˆ`œÀ ÀiÃiÀÛi`>œ˜}È`iˆ}…Ü>Þ{äÎ]Àiœˆ˜ˆ˜}̅iˆÌœ˜ VœÀÀˆ`œÀ˜i>À̅iVÕÀÀi˜Ì Àˆ˜`>iÃÌ>̈œ˜°Ƃ˜œÌ…iÀ`ˆÛiÀȜ˜ …>ÃLii˜«Àœ«œÃi`>Ã>˜>ÌiÀ˜>̈Ûi̜̅i-V>ÀLœÀœÕ}… ÃÕLÜ>ÞiÝÌi˜Ãˆœ˜]܅ˆV…ܜՏ`…>Ûi̅i>`Û>˜Ì>}iœv «ÀœÛˆ`ˆ˜}>˜iÝ«ÀiÃÃÌÀˆ«̜`œÜ˜ÌœÜ˜>˜`>`ˆÀiV̏ˆ˜Ž ˜œÀ̜̅>ÀŽ…>“vÀœ“-V>ÀLœÀœÕ}… i˜ÌÀi°9iÌ>˜œÌ…iÀ œ«Ìˆœ˜ܜՏ`ÕÃiÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ̜՘œVŽ`iÛiœ«“i˜Ìˆ˜̅i *œÀÌ>˜`ÃLÞ«ÀœÛˆ`ˆ˜}À>«ˆ`ÌÀ>˜Ã«œÀÌ>̈œ˜̅ÀœÕ}…œÕÌ ̅iÀi}ˆœ˜°ƂÃ̅iÀi>Ài“œÀiÀ>ˆVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃÃiÀۈ˜}>…ˆ}…iÀ «œ«Õ>̈œ˜œ˜̅iÜiÃÌiÀ˜…>vœv̅i/Ƃ]>̏i>ÃÌܓi ÌÀ>ˆ˜Ã܈…>Ûi̜ÌÕÀ˜>ÀœÕ˜`ˆ˜̅iVˆÌÞVi˜ÌÀi°˜ÃÌi>`] ̅œÃiÃiÀۈViÃVœÕ`LiiÝÌi˜`i`œ˜>ŜÀÌ՘`iÀ}ÀœÕ˜` ÀœÕÌi̜̅i*œÀÌ>˜`Ã]«ÀœÛˆ`ˆ˜}“ÕV…v>ÃÌiÀ>˜`…ˆ}…iÀ‡ V>«>VˆÌÞ>VViÃÃ̜̅ˆÃŽiÞ`iÛiœ«“i˜Ì>Ài>̅>˜̅i «>˜˜i`ÃÌÀiiÌV>À]܅ˆiLiˆ˜}Ài>̈ÛiÞV…i>«̜LՈ` ̅ÀœÕ}…̅i՘`iÛiœ«i`>˜`° If full regional rail service on the Milton corridor could be implemented without disrupting freight movement, a short diversion of the corridor through Mississauga City Centre--a major development centre and the city’s transit hub--combined with regional rail service on the Orangeville Brampton Railway would dramatically expand the area accessible to Mississauga Centre. 53- 134 - /…i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜]>Ã̅iv>ÃÌiÃ̇}ÀœÜˆ˜}Ài}ˆœ˜ˆ˜ œÀ̅Ƃ“iÀˆV>]Vœ˜Ìˆ˜ÕiÃ̜ iÝ«>˜`ˆÌÃÕÀL>˜>Ài>œÕÌÜ>À`°7…ˆiÀœ>`Ã>˜`…ˆ}…Ü>ÞÃ>Àiˆ˜Û>Àˆ>LÞVœ“«iÌi` LivœÀi̅iwÀÃ̘iÜ…œÕÃiˆÃœVVÕ«ˆi`]ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌˆÃ>‡Ìœœ‡œvÌi˜œ˜Þ>``i`>ÌiÀ° Ո`ˆ˜}ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi̅œÕ}…>LՈÌ‡Õ«Vœ““Õ˜ˆÌÞˆÃv>À“œÀiiÝ«i˜ÃˆÛi>˜` `ˆÃÀի̈Ûi̅>˜LՈ`ˆ˜}̅ÀœÕ}…>v>À“wi`°v“>œÀ˜iÜ`iÛiœ«“i˜ÌÃ]ÃÕV…>à -i>̜˜ˆ˜ œÀ̅*ˆVŽiÀˆ˜}>˜`+Õii˜Ãۈi˜œÀ̅œv iܓ>ÀŽiÌ]ÜiÀi`ˆÀiV̏ÞÃiÀÛi` LÞÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆLÀ>˜V…iÃvÀœ“̅iœÕÌÃiÌ]̅iÞܜՏ`Li“ÕV…“œÀiˆŽiÞ̜`iÛiœ« ˆ˜Ìœ̅iwvÌii˜‡“ˆ˜ÕÌi]ÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ‡œÀˆi˜Ìi`Vœ““Õ˜ˆÌˆiÃ̅>ÌÜi>ëˆÀi̜LՈ`° /…iivviV̈Ûiˆ“«i“i˜Ì>̈œ˜œvÀi}ˆœ˜>À>ˆV>˜ÃiÌ̅i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜œ˜>˜iÜ «>̅°ÌܜՏ`“i>˜“œÀi>VViÃÃ̜œLÃ>˜`ÃiÀۈViÃvœÀÀiÈ`i˜ÌÃ]>˜`̜Ì>i˜ÌvœÀ i“«œÞiÀðÌܜՏ`“i>˜Ài`ÕVi`Vœ˜}iÃ̈œ˜œ˜œÕÀi݈Ã̈˜}ˆ˜vÀ>ÃÌÀÕVÌÕÀi°ÌܜՏ` “i>˜>œÜiÀi`V>ÀLœ˜vœœÌ«Àˆ˜Ì>˜`LiÌÌiÀ>ˆÀµÕ>ˆÌÞ°Ƃ˜`ˆÌܜՏ`…i«iÃÌ>LˆÃ… “œÀiVœ“«iÌi]VœÃi‡Ž˜ˆÌVœ““Õ˜ˆÌˆið iÃÌœv>]ˆÌV>˜Li>VVœ“«ˆÃ…i`vœÀ> vÀ>V̈œ˜œv̅iVœÃÌœvLՈ`ˆ˜}>VÀœÃÇÀi}ˆœ˜>˜iÌܜÀŽœvVœÀÀˆ`œÀÃvÀœ“ÃVÀ>ÌV…° Ո`ˆ˜}Ài>Ài}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ“ÕÃÌLi̅iÌÀ>˜Ã«œÀÌ>̈œ˜Ì>Îœv̅ˆÃ}i˜iÀ>̈œ˜° Building infrastructure though a built-up community is far more expensive and disruptive than building through CHCTOƂGNF+HOCLQTPGYFGXGNQROGPVUUWEJCU5GCVQP in North Pickering and Queensville north of Newmarket, were directly served by regional rail branches from the outset, they would be much more likely to develop into VJGƂHVGGPOKPWVGVTCPUKVQTKGPVGFEQOOWPKVKGUVJCVYG aspire to build. 54 CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL - 135 - Appendix: Proposed Station Locations >ÀÀˆi ˆÌV…i˜iÀ CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 55- 136 - >ŽiŜÀi >ÃÌ >ŽiŜÀi7iÃÌ Appendix 56- 137 - Ìœ˜ -̜Õvۈi Appendix CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 57- 138 - CORRIDOR MAP (PAGE 12) …ÌÌ«\ÉÉÜÜÜ°“iÌÀœˆ˜Ý°Vœ“Éi˜É«ÀœiVÌÃ>˜`«Àœ}À>“ÃÉVœÀÀˆ`œÀœÜ˜iÀň«ÉVœÀÀˆ`œÀڜܘiÀň«°>Ã«Ý NEIGHBOURHOOD IMPROVEMENT AREAS MAP (PAGE 13) — DATA CREDITS NIA boundaries …ÌÌ«Ã\Éɜ«i˜°ÌœÀœ˜Ìœ°V>É`>Ì>ÃiÌɘiˆ}…LœÕÀ…œœ`‡ˆ“«ÀœÛi“i˜Ì‡>Ài>ÃÉ Municipal boundaries …ÌÌ«Ã\ÉÉ}iœ…ÕL°ˆœ°}œÛ°œ˜°V>É`>Ì>ÃiÌÃɓ՘ˆVˆ«>‡LœÕ˜`>ÀއœÜiÀ‡>˜`‡Ãˆ˜}i‡ÌˆiÀ Transit route shapes /À>˜ÃˆÌ>}i˜VÞ/-vii`à ISOCHRONE MAPS (PAGES 15, 47 AND 50) Municipal boundaries …ÌÌ«Ã\ÉÉ}iœ…ÕL°ˆœ°}œÛ°œ˜°V>É`>Ì>ÃiÌÃɓ՘ˆVˆ«>‡LœÕ˜`>ÀއœÜiÀ‡>˜`‡Ãˆ˜}i‡ÌˆiÀ Transit route shapes and schedule data /À>˜ÃˆÌ>}i˜VÞ/-vii`ívœÀ{ÉÓ䣙® Street network data "«i˜-ÌÀiiÌ>«Vœ˜ÌÀˆLÕ̜Àà Isochrone generation …ÌÌ«Ã\ÉÉÜÜÜ°œ«i˜ÌÀˆ««>˜˜iÀ°œÀ}É­Ãii…iÀivœÀVˆÌ>̈œ˜}Ո`i® TRAINS PER HOUR CHARTS (PAGES 26-27) Schedule data /À>˜ÃˆÌ>}i˜VÞ/-vii`ívœÀ£äÉÓ䣙® OBRY MAP AND APPENDIX MAPS (PAGES 52 AND 55-57) Municipal boundaries …ÌÌ«Ã\ÉÉ}iœ…ÕL°ˆœ°}œÛ°œ˜°V>É`>Ì>ÃiÌÃɓ՘ˆVˆ«>‡LœÕ˜`>ÀއœÜiÀ‡>˜`‡Ãˆ˜}i‡ÌˆiÀ Transit route shapes /À>˜ÃˆÌ>}i˜VÞ/-vii`à Street network shapes "«i˜-ÌÀiiÌ>«Vœ˜ÌÀˆLÕ̜Àà OBRY corridor shape …ÌÌ«Ã\Éɜ«i˜°V>˜>`>°V>É`>Ì>Éi˜É`>Ì>ÃiÌÉ>VÓÈnäÇi‡>£in‡{™v>‡nÇLv‡{x££Çx>nx™Ln Map Credits 58- 139 - £°ºThe Economic Value of Airports»]/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜ œ>À`œv/À>`i – …ÌÌ«Ã\ÉÉÜÜÜ°LœÌ°Vœ“É*œÀÌ>ÃÉäÉ* ÃÉ/…i‡ Vœ˜œ“ˆV‡6>Õi‡œv‡ƂˆÀ«œÀÌÇ  °«`v Ó°ºA Green Light to Moving The Toronto Region»]/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜ œ>À`œv/À>`iq …ÌÌ«Ã\ÉÉÜÜÜ°LœÌ°Vœ“É*œˆVÞƂ`ۜV>VÞÉ >“«>ˆ}˜ÃÉiÌà Ài>Ž/…iÀˆ`œVŽ°>Ã«Ý Î°ºHousing a Generation of Workers: Modeling Solutions»]/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜ œ>À`œv /À>`iq…ÌÌ«Ã\ÉÉܜÀŽvœÀVi…œÕȘ}Ó°ÌÀLœÌ°V>É {°ºTransformTO Climate Action Strategy»] ˆÌÞœv/œÀœ˜Ìœq…ÌÌ«Ã\ÉÉÜÜ̜ܰÀœ˜Ìœ°V>É ÃiÀۈViÇ«>ޓi˜ÌÃÉÜ>ÌiÀ‡i˜ÛˆÀœ˜“i˜ÌÉi˜ÛˆÀœ˜“i˜Ì>Þ‡vÀˆi˜`Þ‡VˆÌއˆ˜ˆÌˆ>̈ÛiÃÉ ÌÀ>˜ÃvœÀ“ÌœÉÌÀ>˜ÃvœÀ“Ìœ‡Vˆ“>Ìi‡>V̈œ˜‡ÃÌÀ>Ìi}ÞÉ x°ºPath To Healthier Air: Toronto Air Pollution Burden of Illness Update»] ˆÌÞœv/œÀœ˜Ìœ – …ÌÌ«Ã\ÉÉÜÜ̜ܰÀœ˜Ìœ°V>ÉÜ«‡Vœ˜Ìi˜ÌÉÕ«œ>`ÃÉÓä£ÇÉ££É™£™ä‡Ì«…‡ƂˆÀ‡*œṎœ˜‡ ÕÀ`i˜‡ œv‡˜iÃÇÓä£{°«`v È°ºThe Big Move: Transforming Transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area» qiÌÀœˆ˜Ý…ÌÌ«\ÉÉÜÜÜ°“iÌÀœˆ˜Ý°Vœ“É̅iLˆ}“œÛiÉi˜É Ç°ºReview of Metrolinx’s Big Move»]/…i i«ÌˆÃœÕ˜`>̈œ˜ – …ÌÌ«Ã\Éɘi«ÌˆÃ°œÀ}É«ÕLˆV>̈œ˜ÃÉÀiۈi܇“iÌÀœˆ˜ÝÇLˆ}‡“œÛi n°ºShaping Our Future»]/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜ œ>À`œv/À>`i – …ÌÌ«Ã\ÉÉÜÜÜ°LœÌ°Vœ“É*œÀÌ>ÃÉäÉ* ÃÉ-…>«ˆ˜}"ÕÀÕÌÕÀi°«`v ™°ºToronto Region: Canada’s Innovation Corridor»]/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜ œ>À`œv/À>`i – …ÌÌ«Ã\ÉÉÜÜÜ°LœÌ°Vœ“É*œÀÌ>ÃÉÚ`iv>ՏÌÉ7/ ‡/Ú-“>ÀÌ ˆÌˆiÃڈ˜vœ°«`v £ä°“2 Way All Day GO Train Survey 2018” – …ÌÌ«\ÉÉVœ˜˜iVÌ̅iVœÀÀˆ`œÀ°V>ɘiÜÃɈӇ ‡ " /‡**/‡Óä£n‡££‡ ӇVœ“«ÀiÃÃi`°«`v ££°ºMaking the Case for Workforce Housing»]/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜ œ>À`œv/À>`i – …ÌÌ«Ã\ÉÉܜÀŽvœÀVi…œÕȘ}°ÌÀLœÌ°V>ɓ>Žˆ˜}̅iV>ÃiÉ £Ó°ºTransit Deserts & Hulchanski’s Three Cities»]>À̈˜*ÀœÃ«iÀˆÌÞ˜Ã̈ÌÕÌi – …ÌÌ«\Éɓ>À̈˜«ÀœÃ«iÀˆÌÞ°œÀ}ÉÌÀ>˜ÃˆÌ‡`iÃiÀÌDžՏV…>˜ÃŽˆÃ‡Ì…Àii‡VˆÌˆiÃÉ £Î°“75% of the jobs in the region.” “Shaping Our Future”, Toronto Region Board of Trade – …ÌÌ«Ã\ÉÉÜÜÜ°LœÌ°Vœ“É*œÀÌ>ÃÉÚ`iv>ՏÌÉ,,Ú7œÀŽ/À>VŽ{°«`v°/…iwÛiÌÞ«iÃœv`ˆÃÌÀˆVÌà >Ài\œœ`Ã*Àœ`ÕV̈œ˜>˜` ˆÃÌÀˆLṎœ˜ ˆÃÌÀˆVÌ]-iÀۈViÃ>˜`ˆÝi`‡1Ãi ˆÃÌÀˆVÌ] iÌÀœ«œˆÌ>˜ i˜ÌÀi],i}ˆœ˜> i˜ÌÀi]>˜`˜œÜi`}i Ài>̈œ˜ ˆÃÌÀˆVÌ° £{°ºShaping Our Future»]/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜ œ>À`œv/À>`i – …ÌÌ«Ã\ÉÉÜÜÜ°LœÌ°Vœ“É*œÀÌ>ÃÉÚ`iv>ՏÌÉ,,Ú7œÀŽ/À>VŽ{°«`v £x°ºThe Finger Plan: A Strategy for the Development of the Greater Copenhagen Area”] >˜ˆÃ…ˆ˜ˆÃÌÀÞœv̅i ˜ÛˆÀœ˜“i˜Ì – …ÌÌ«Ã\ÉÉ`>˜ˆÃ…LÕȘiÃÃ>Õ̅œÀˆÌÞ°`ŽÉÈÌiÃÉ`iv>ՏÌÉwiÃÉv«‡i˜}ÚΣڣÎäxÓä£x°«`v £È°,i}ˆœ˜>À>ˆ«>˜Ã – …ÌÌ«Ã\ÉÉÀ>ˆÀœ>`ð`œÌ°}œÛÉÈÌiÃÉvÀ>°`œÌ°}œÛÉwiÃÉvÀ>ژiÌÉÓ£Ó£ÉÀÀäȣ䰫`v £Ç°º7 Rules for Creating 15 Minute Neighborhoods»]-ÌÀœ˜}/œÜ˜i`ˆ> – …ÌÌ«Ã\ÉÉÜÜÜ°ÃÌÀœ˜}̜ܘðœÀ}ɍœÕÀ˜>ÉÓ䣙əÉÈÉLJÀՏiÇvœÀ‡VÀi>̈˜}‡£x‡“ˆ˜ÕÌi‡ ˜iˆ}…LœÀ…œœ`à £n°ºGuidelines for Planning Bus Services»]/À>˜Ã«œÀÌvœÀœ˜`œ˜ – …ÌÌ«\ÉÉVœ˜Ìi˜Ì°Ìy°}œÛ°ÕŽÉLÕÇÃiÀۈVi‡«>˜˜ˆ˜}‡}Ո`iˆ˜ið«`v £™°ºLe train de banlieue arrive a Mirabel»] ,>`ˆœ >˜>`> – …ÌÌ«Ã\ÉɈVˆ°À>`ˆœ‡V>˜>`>°V>ɘœÕÛiiÉ£ÇÈäǙ{ɘœÕÛii‡}>Ài‡iݜ‡À̓‡ˆ}˜i‡Ã>ˆ˜Ì‡ iÀœ“i‡>ÕÀi˜Ìˆ`iǓˆÃi‡i˜‡ÃiÀۈVi Óä°º17 Neue bahn haltepunkte durch stationoffensive»],…iˆ˜«v>â – …ÌÌ«Ã\ÉÉÜÜÜ°À…iˆ˜«v>â°`iÉ܈ÀÌÃV…>vÌÚ>À̈Ži]‡£Ç‡˜iÕi‡L>…˜‡…>Ìi«Õ˜ŽÌi‡`ÕÀV…‡ ÃÌ>̈œ˜Ãœvvi˜ÃˆÛi‡Ú>Àˆ`]x£ÎÈΣӰ…Ì“ Endnotes CONNECTING COMMUNITIES WITH REGIONAL RAIL 59- 140 - /…i/œÀœ˜Ìœ,i}ˆœ˜ œ>À`œv/À>`iܜÀŽÃœ˜Li…>v œvœÕÀi“LiÀÃ̜“>Ži/œÀœ˜Ìœ] œÀ̅Ƃ“iÀˆV>½Ã vœÕÀ̅‡>À}iÃÌVœ““iÀVˆ>Vi˜ÌÀi]œ˜iœv̅i“œÃÌ Vœ“«ï̈Ûi>˜`ÜÕ}…̇>vÌiÀLÕȘiÃÃÀi}ˆœ˜Ãˆ˜ ̅iܜÀ`°i>À˜“œÀi>Ì bot.com>˜`vœœÜÕà @TorontoRBOT Acknowledgements /…ˆÃÀi«œÀÌÜ>ÃÜÀˆÌÌi˜LÞœ˜>̅>˜ ˜}ˆÃ…܈̅ ÃÕ««œÀÌ]`>Ì>>˜>ÞÈÃ]>˜`“>««ˆ˜}LÞ1`>Þ -V…ՏÌâ°Ƃ˜ˆ˜ÌiÀ˜>̈œ˜>Ìi>“œviÝ«iÀÌÃvÀœ“ iœˆÌÌi«ÀœÛˆ`i`Û>Õ>LiVœ˜ÌÀˆLṎœ˜Ã>˜` ˆ˜Ãˆ}…Ìð/…iÀi«œÀÌÜ>Ãi`ˆÌi`LÞƂiÝV Àˆi˜] Ƃۈ ½-œÕâ>]>˜`->…>À<ˆ>iÞ° iÈ}˜Ü>ëÀœÛˆ`i` LÞˆÃ> >ۈܘ iÈ}˜°/…iÀi«œÀÌÜ>ÃŽˆ˜`Þ ÀiۈiÜi`LÞ>˜ i-ˆÛ>],œÃii>À̈˜œ]>ÀVÞ ÕÀV…wi`]>˜`*…ˆ˜œœ“LÕ°7iȘViÀiÞ̅>˜Ž ÕiÀ}i˜>À“>˜˜]ˆV…iiœˆ˜>Àˆ]/ÞܘœœÀi] >˜`>ˆâՏœ…iivœÀˆ˜Û>Õ>LiÌiV…˜ˆV> Vœ““i˜ÌÃ]>ÃÜi>Ã̅i“>˜ÞœÌ…iÀVœ˜ÌÀˆLÕ̜Àà >˜`Vœ““i˜ÌiÀÃvœÀ̅iˆÀ̈“i>˜`ˆ˜Ãˆ}…Ìð - 141 - Page 1 of 2 Nathan Cato Director Government Affairs Suite 1110 81 Metcalfe Street Ottawa Ontario Canada K1P 6K7 T 613-237-1572 E Nathan_Cato@cpr.ca April 7, 2021 Mr. Ralph Walton, Regional Clerk/Director of Legislative Services Regional Municipality of Durham Corporate Services Department - Legislative Services 605 Rossland Rd. E., Level 1 PO Box 623 Whitby, ON L1N 6A3 Dear Mr. Walton: Thank you for your letter of March 25, 2021, regarding rail traffic data. I am pleased to respond on behalf of Canadian Pacific (“CP”). Your letter requests that CP provide rail traffic data to noise consultants. While we appreciate that developers may be undertaking impact analysis for potential development in close proximity to railway infrastructure, rail traffic volume on any part of our North American network is a function of market demand. Traffic volumes fluctuate regularly as market demand for goods and commodities shifts or as export patterns change. Consequently, any rail traffic data is only a “snapshot” in time and should not ever be relied upon to take decisions with respect to development near rail infrastructure that would have a long life expectancy. In any event, CP considers its traffic data proprietary and confidential. That being said, CP has at times provided traffic data to some developers and noise consultants. Unfortunately, we found this practice was inconsistent, and in some cases, developers were using the data to justify the avoidance of important noise and vibration mitigation measures for developments in close proximity to rail infrastructure. Given the nature of rail traffic, CP recommends that developers, municipalities, and other stakeholders, adopt and respect the Proximity Guidelines established jointly by the Railway Association of Canada and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities. The guidelines describe the minimum standards and mitigation measures that should be incorporated for any development in close proximity to railway infrastructure. They also set out the railway consultation process for specific projects. The guidelines are available online at www.proximityissues.ca. Railway infrastructure is heavy industrial property that forms the backbone of Canada’s national supply chain, with Canadians from coast to coast depending on the food, medicine, heating oil, and other critical freight that CP transports every day. Railways, including CP, are con sidered essential services by the federal governments of both Canada and the United States, and every provincial and state government across our North American network. Corr. 21-21 - 142 - Page 2 of 2 CP trains move traffic 24 hours a day, seven days a week, in the service of our customers and by extension the needs of Canada’s economy. Any development near railway infrastructure should assume the potential for frequent train activity at any time of the day and any day of the year. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, Nathan Cato Director, Government Affairs Canadian Pacific c.c.: The Honourable Omar Alghabra, federal Minister of Transport N. Cooper, Clerk, Town of Ajax B. Jamieson, Clerk, Township of Brock J. Gallagher, Clerk, Municipality of Clarington M. Medeiros, Clerk, City of Oshawa S. Cassel, Clerk, City of Pickering L. Fleury, Acting Clerk, Township of Scugog D. Leroux, Clerk, Township of Uxbridge C. Harris, Clerk, Town of Whitby Jennifer O’Connell, MP (Pickering/Uxbridge) Mark Holland, MP (Ajax) Ryan Turnbull, MP (Whitby) Dr. Colin Carrie, MP (Oshawa) Erin O’Toole, MP (Durham) Jamie Schmale, MP (Haliburton/Kawartha Lakes/Brock) Philip Lawrence, MP (Northumberland-Peterborough South) Peter Bethlenfalvy, MPP (Pickering/Uxbridge) Rod Phillips, MPP (Ajax) Lorne Coe, MPP (Whitby) Jennifer French, MPP (Oshawa) Lindsey Park, MPP (Durham) Laurie Scott, MPP (Haliburton/Kawartha Lakes/Brock) David Piccini, MPP (Northumberland-Peterborough South) Association of Municipalities Ontario (AMO) Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) B. Bridgeman, Commissioner of Planning and Economic Development - 143 - Corporate Services Department City Clerk Services The Corporation of the City of Oshawa, 50 Centre Street South, Oshawa, Ontario L1H 3Z7 Phone 905∙436∙3311 1∙800∙667∙4292 Fax 905∙436∙5697 www.oshawa.ca File: A-2100 April 8, 2021 DELIVERED BY E-MAIL (clerks@durham.ca) Region of Durham DELIVERED BY E-MAIL (hmo@hamiltonport.ca) Hamilton-Oshawa Port Authority Re: Process to Establish the City of Oshawa including the lands in Oshawa operated by Hamilton-Oshawa Port Authority as a Foreign Trade Zone Oshawa City Council considered the above matter at its meeting of March 29, 2021 and adopted the following recommendation: “1. That the City of Oshawa, Region of Durham and the Hamilton-Oshawa Port Authority be requested to work jointly together to investigate the work necessary to apply with the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario to establish the appropriate area in Durham Region including the City of Oshawa and the lands in Oshawa operated by the Hamilton-Oshawa Port Authority as a Foreign Trade Zone Point; and, 2.That a copy of this Report and the related Council resolution be sent to the Greater Oshawa Chamber of Commerce, all Durham Boards of Trade/Chambers of Commerce, Durham Region Labour Council, the Region of Durham, the Hamilton- Oshawa Port Authority, all Durham Region municipalities and all Durham Region M.P.s and M.P.P.s.” For your information, enclosed is a copy of the report of the Commissioner, Development Services Department DS-21-34. The City of Sault Ste. Marie was recently designated as Canada’s 15th FTZ Point. We have attached their original application for reference. If you require further information or clarification, please contact Brett Murphy at the address shown or by telephone at (905) 436-3311, extension 2361 or by email to bmurphy@oshawa.ca. Mary Medeiros City Clerk Corr. 22-21 - 144 - 2 /fb c. Development Services Department Greater Oshawa Chamber of Commerce All Durham Boards of Trade/Chamber of Commerce Durham Region Labour Council Durham Region Municipalities Durham Region Members of Parliament and Provincial Parliament - 145 - Public Report To: Development Services Committee From: Warren Munro, HBA, RPP, Commissioner, Development Services Department Report Number: DS-21-34 Date of Report: March 3, 2021 Date of Meeting: March 8, 2021 Subject: Process to Establish the City of Oshawa including the lands in Oshawa operated by Hamilton-Oshawa Port Authority as a Foreign Trade Zone File: B-1500 1.0 Purpose On December 14th, 2020, City Council adopted the following motion: “Whereas, a Foreign Trade Zone (F.T.Z.) generally refers to a specific location within a country that is officially designated for eligibility for tariff and tax exemptions; and, Whereas, the exemptions relate to the purchase or importation of raw materials, components or finished goods, where such materials and goods can generally be stored, processed or assembled in the F.T.Z. for re-export or for entry into the domestic market; and, Whereas, the City of Hamilton, including the lands operated as by Hamilton- Oshawa Port Authority (H.O.P.A.) in Hamilton have been designated by the Federal government, with the assistance of FedDev Ontario as a F.T.Z.; and, Whereas on November 20, 2020 the Mayor’s Task Force on Economy Recovery asked the City to consider establishing the City of Oshawa and the lands operated by H.O.P.A. in Oshawa as a F.T.Z. to help advance economic recovery in the Region; Therefore, Development Services staff be directed to investigate the necessary steps to establish the City of Oshawa including the lands in Oshawa operated by Hamilton-Oshawa Port Authority as a Foreign Trade Zone and report back to the Development Services Committee”. The purpose of this Report is to request that the Region of Durham and the Hamilton- Oshawa Port Authority be requested to work cooperatively together to investigate the work 264- 146 - Report to Development Services Committee Item: DS-21-34 Meeting Date: March 8, 2021 Page 2 necessary to apply with the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario to establish the appropriate area in Durham Region including the City of Oshawa and the lands in Oshawa operated by the Hamilton-Oshawa Port Authority as a Foreign Trade Zone Point. Attachment 1 to this Report is a chart showing the criteria used by FedDev Ontario to review applications to establish a Foreign Trade Zone Point (F.T.Z.P.). The criteria appears to be more of a guideline than strict requirements. 2.0 Recommendation That the Development Services Committee recommend to City Council: 1. That the Region of Durham and the Hamilton-Oshawa Port Authority be requested to work cooperatively together to investigate the work necessary to apply with the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario to establish the appropriate area in Durham Region including the City of Oshawa and the lands in Oshawa operated by the Hamilton-Oshawa Port Authority as a Foreign Trade Zone Point. 2. That a copy of this Report and the related Council resolution be sent to the Greater Oshawa Chamber of Commerce, the Region of Durham, the Hamilton-Oshawa Port Authority, all Durham Region municipalities and all Durham Region M.P.s and M.P.P.s. 3.0 Executive Summary Not applicable. 4.0 Input From Other Sources The following have been consulted in the preparation of this Report:  Airport Manager  Region of Durham Economic Development  City of Hamilton  Ontario Ministry of Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade  FedDev Ontario  H.O.P.A. 5.0 Analysis 5.1 Foreign Trade Zone versus Foreign Trade Zone Point An F.T.Z. refers to a large geographic area which can be made up of multiple F.T.Z.P.s. In that regard, it should be noted that all of Canada is designated as an F.T.Z. While there are 14 F.T.Z.P.s in Canada, in the context of the Province of Ontario there are currently only the three following locations:  City of Hamilton  Niagara Region 265- 147 - Report to Development Services Committee Item: DS-21-34 Meeting Date: March 8, 2021 Page 3  Windsor and Essex County It is important to note the differences in governance between the City of Oshawa and the three existing F.T.Z.P.s in Ontario. The City of Hamilton is a single tier municipality that does not include an upper tier regional government. Niagara Region is an upper tier regional municipality consisting of 12 lower tier municipalities in southern Ontario. Finally, the F.T.Z.P. for Windsor-Essex consists of the single tier City of Windsor and the County of Essex which is an upper tier municipality in southwestern Ontario consisting of 7 lower tier municipalities. This contrasts with the governance model in Durham Region where the City of Oshawa is a lower tier municipality and the Region of Durham is the upper tier level of government. 5.2 Background on Foreign Trade Zone Point An F.T.Z.P. refers to one of Canada’s 14 strategic locations for international trade, where an organization with a mandate to promote local trade and foreign direct investment is uniquely supported by a single-point of access to information on relevant government policies and programs. Existing F.T.Z.P.s view the designation as a concierge program or “one-stop-shop” for clients to more conveniently access Federal trade programs and incentives. The belief is that this consolidated grouping of Federal agencies and resources will provide more streamlined access to programs. This will maximize value to the client, improve overall uptake of programs and directly connect clients with administering agencies and experts. The programs appear to specifically target small and medium sized businesses with more limited resources and experience with exporting. Typically, larger organizations have the resources and expertise necessary to navigate these programs successfully without any consultation from or interaction with an F.T.Z.P. Existing F.T.Z.P.s promote southern Ontario as a hub for international trade and aim to attract foreign and domestic investment. F.T.Z.P.s align with the Government of Canada's priorities to help businesses integrate into foreign markets and global value chains. They provide streamlined information on the Government of Canada's tax and tariff export- related programs that can make it easier for businesses looking to expand and export. F.T.Z.P. incentives include:  The Duty Deferral Program  The Drawback Program  The Customs Bonded Warehouse Program  The Export Distribution Centre Program  The Exporters of Processing Services Program Collectively, these types of programs offer:  Access to Federal, Provincial and Regional incentive programs that support Canada’s export development efforts; 266- 148 - Report to Development Services Committee Item: DS-21-34 Meeting Date: March 8, 2021 Page 4  Direct access to goods movement sector professionals, including Federal agencies, related to air, sea, rail and road cargo;  Opportunities to participate in networking events and trade missions;  Provide resources, introductions and assistance; and,  Mentoring services from experienced exporters. 5.3 Foreign Trade Zone Steering Committee The process to advance an F.T.Z.P. application is usually kick-started by establishing a steering committee consisting of local municipal partners and business stakeholders to oversee, review and submit the application. The steering committee for the City of Hamilton included:  The City of Hamilton;  John C. Munro International Airport;  H.O.P.A.;  Canada Border Services Agency;  Canada Revenue Agency;  Transport Canada;  Global Affairs Canada;  Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada; and,  Export Development Canada. 5.4 Regional Roles and Responsibilities The Region needs to take a lead role in the investigation into the appropriateness of an F.T.Z.P. in Durham Region in general and the City of Oshawa in particular. As the upper tier regional level of government, the Region of Durham’s roles and responsibilities will include but not be limited to:  Establishing an F.T.Z.P. steering committee and leading the formal application process in cooperation with H.O.P.A., lower tier municipal partners and regional stakeholders;  Establishing process and guidelines for the successful operation of an F.T.Z.P., in cooperation with steering committee members;  Funding the F.T.Z.P. application process with assistance of H.O.P.A., including any external parties along with the ongoing operation of the established F.T.Z.P.;  Advocacy with Federal and Provincial agencies involved in the evaluation of the F.T.Z.P. application;  In partnership with H.O.P.A., tracking and reporting on metrics associated with international trade throughout the Region to report on annual progress; 267- 149 - Report to Development Services Committee Item: DS-21-34 Meeting Date: March 8, 2021 Page 5  Acting as a first point of contact for Regional businesses seeking guidance on international trade;  Establishing a direct line of contact with partnering Federal agencies on international trade and assisting Regional companies in the navigation of Federal trade programs; and,  Marketing the F.T.Z.P. to the Regional business community as a resource for approaching international markets. 5.5 Hamilton-Oshawa Port Authority Roles and Responsibilities As a local leader in multimodal logistics and a facilitator of international trade, H.O.P.A.’s roles and responsibilities will include but not be limited to:  Providing all necessary data for an F.T.Z.P. application with regards to local marine assets, current multimodal infrastructure as well as planned improvements to any infrastructure that would contribute to the development of the F.T.Z.P. application;  Advising on the F.T.Z.P. application process based on prior involvement and experience with a successful F.T.Z.P. designation;  Liaising with the Region directly on matters pertaining to international trade; and,  Supporting Regional advocacy efforts through existing H.O.P.A. communication channels. 5.6 City of Oshawa Roles and Responsibilities As a lower tier municipality and host city to many of the Region’s multimodal assets (e.g. rail, port, airport), the City of Oshawa’s roles and responsibilities will include but not be limited to:  Contributing to the F.T.Z.P. application process from a municipal perspective;  Steering committee membership;  Directing international trade inquiries to the regional F.T.Z.P. and providing municipal assistance where required; and,  Assisting in regionally led marketing and advocacy efforts on international trade leveraging municipal communication channels. 5.7 Insights from Hamilton Economic Development The City of Hamilton Economic Development Department has advised that F.T.Z.P. application process is lengthy. Their process involved a team of local partners, including H.O.P.A., the City of Hamilton’s Economic Development Department, and the John C. Munro Hamilton International Airport. Written support from local stakeholders was 268- 150 - Report to Development Services Committee Item: DS-21-34 Meeting Date: March 8, 2021 Page 6 highlighted as an essential element of the application, including all levels of government and private sector participation/oversight. Over the course of two years, Hamilton’s Steering Committee worked together to achieve their F.T.Z.P. designation. They formed the steering committee for the application and contributed financially to establishing and maintaining the F.T.Z.P. The total application package was 60 pages, in addition to appendices that included approximately a dozen supporting documents. As a requirement of the F.T.Z.P. application, a designated staff member was appointed as the primary contact for all matters related to the F.T.Z.P. A contract position at H.O.P.A. was also created to write the application over the course of 6 months. Once the application was approved and the designation awarded, H.O.P.A transferred this role to a staff member at the City of Hamilton Economic Development Office. 5.8 Insights from Durham Region Informal discussions within Durham Region have led to an initial investigation into the establishment of an F.T.Z.P. The Region continues to evaluate the potential opportunity as their Economic Development Department undertakes a new strategy and action plan in 2021. As part of the Region’s economic development strategy consultations, the F.T.Z.P. will be more thoroughly evaluated to determine its suitability and value to the Region. This Report recommends that the Region be requested to work co-operatively with H.O.P.A. to investigate the establishment of an F.T.Z.P. 5.9 Staff Comments on Criteria Attachment 1 to this Report is a chart showing the criteria used by FedDev Ontario to review applications to establish an F.T.Z.P. Staff comments are noted below:  The criteria appear to be more of a guideline as opposed to strict and measurable standards;  The City’s and Region’s Economic Development Strategy both recognize the importance of the lands in Oshawa operated by H.O.P.A.;  More detailed work would be required to confirm how the F.T.Z.P. would meet the criteria related to a favourable business environment;  Proximity to highways, railways and post-secondary institutions can be demonstrated; and,  More research would be needed on the criteria related to the Oshawa Executive Airport. 269- 151 - Report to Development Services Committee Item: DS-21-34 Meeting Date: March 8, 2021 Page 7 6.0 Financial Implications There are no immediate financial implications resulting from the recommendations of this Report. Future financial implications resulting from a successful F.T.Z.P. application could be assumed in the annual Economic Development Services operating budget and would include matters such as marketing, seminars, speaking engagements, trade show attendance, trade missions and marketing material. 7.0 Relationship to the Oshawa Strategic Plan The recommendation advances the Accountable Leadership and Economic Prosperity and Financial Stewardship Goals of the Oshawa Strategic Plan. Warren Munro, HBA, RPP, Commissioner, Development Services Department 270- 152 - Page 1 of 2 Item: DS-21-34 Attachment 1 Foreign Trade Zone Assessment Considerations Assessment Criteria Examples Provincial and Regional Support Financial commitments from Province/Region via: -Direct funding -Favourable land and zoning framework -Favourable tax arrangements Indicated as a priority in the City’s or Region’s Economic Development strategy Identified as a priority in municipal planning documents Incorporated into Provincial legislation Willingness of Province to dedicate staff to steering committee Support in launching/marketing new F.T.Z.P. Private Sector Support and Governance Membership and leadership on steering committee Financial commitments Favourable Business Environment Competitive taxes, levies subsides and utilities Affordable serviced land and office space for expansion Appropriate zoning for development Multimodal Infrastructure Proximity to: -National highways -Tier 1 or regional airport with servicing city with high cargo volume (24/7) -Communications infrastructure -Class 1 transcontinental freight railway system -Marine port Infrastructure financing and servicing supported by governments Well integrated into global supply chains and trade corridors Allows for the transfer of containers/goods between multiple modes of transportation (intermodal transfer) and the processing of international trade Warehousing and transloading facilities Wide range of domestic and international logistics support is readily available (e.g. presence of customs brokers and global freight forwarders) 271- 153 - Page 2 of 2 Assessment Criteria Examples Talent Presence of post-secondary institutions Availability of skilled labour and competitive wages in: -Logistics, warehousing, manufacturing, marketing and trucking 272- 154 - SAULT STE. MARIE SAULT STE. MARIE Foreign Trade Zone Point Designation Application ONTARIO CANADA July 2019 - 155 - 2 SAULT STE. MARIE Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 FTZ Point Proposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Specific Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Strategic Attributes/Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Implementing FTZ Point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 Next Steps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16 Appendix A – Letters and Resolutions of Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18 CONTENTS Dan Hollingsworth Executive Director 705-759-5428 | d .hollingsworth@ssmedc .ca www.investsaultstemarie.com 99 Foster Drive, Level 1 Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario Canada P6A 5X6 - 156 - 3 SAULT STE. MARIE The City of Sault Ste . Marie is formally applying to the Federal Economic Development Initiative in Northern Ontario for a Foreign Trade Zone Point (FTZ Point) designation. This application is being led by the Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation (SSMEDC) and is supported by City Council and SSMEDC Board resolutions, and industry and community stakeholders (See Appendix A for support letters). Sault Ste . Marie is an international trade gateway – by land and waterway, and by rail and air access. The city has long been a major centre for resource processing and transportation, and manufacturing in Northern Ontario. It is the major northern Ontario gateway for Canada-U.S. trade by rail and truck across two dedicated bridges, and by marine transport through the Great Lakes/St. Lawrence Seaway. In 2017 the total value of trade across the International Bridge was $1.629 billion U.S. – $838.2 million in exports to the U.S. and $791.1 million in imports to Canada . Sault Ste. Marie is a natural hub of trade in the region. The community shares an uncongested border with the United States, offers multimodal shipping both domestically and internationally, is located on the Great Lakes with a deep sea port, and offers many other advantages for importing and exporting products and goods . Strategically located at the nexus between Canada’s east-west road and rail networks and U .S . North- South rail and highway systems, Sault Ste. Marie is well-positioned to facilitate trade between the heartlands of the two countries with the largest two- way trading relationship in the world . International trade, especially two-way Canada- U.S. trade, has long been the life blood of Canada’s economy. Trade volumes have continued to grow between the two countries following NAFTA, and are expected to continue under the United States-Mexico -Canada Agreement . INTRODUCTION There are a range of companies that are an active part of North American and global supply chains, including both manufacturing and service companies. These companies make use of domestic and imported inputs and export various goods and services. The City of Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario is committed to growing international trade opportunities, growing local business and attracting new investment to the community . The Sault Ste . Marie Economic Development Corporation through its Invest Sault Ste. Marie program, works with stakeholders in the community to drive economic development and growth . International trade represents a growing segment and opportunity for local business and industry . SSMEDC has identified international market development, trade development and the establishment of an FTZ Point designation as key priorities in their 2019-2024 strategic plan and 2019 business plan. Designation also aligns well with existing international marketing efforts and our work developing a Bi-National Investment District with Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan. - 157 - 4 SAULT STE. MARIE SSMEDC has identified more than 50 local companies currently involved in international trade activities, and more than 30 additional companies with interest in developing new international markets. While some businesses benefit from existing Foreign Trade Zone programs, we note that many more businesses are unaware of the programs or do not have the human resource capacity to take advantage of them . A federal FTZ Point designation would benefit Sault Ste. Marie and area, Ontario and Canada by: • Improving coordination of the community’s trade promotion efforts by bringing together local, provincial and federal officials with a mandate to promote and facilitate international trade . • Helping provide a dedicated focus on facilitating trade through community leadership which can identify gaps in hard and soft infrastructure and then advocating for investment in this infrastructure. Program Main Benefit Administered/Regulated by Duties Relief Upfront relief of duties Canada Border Services Agency Duties Drawback Refunds duties for exported goods Canada Border Services Agency Customs Bonded Warehouse Defers/relieves duties and taxes Canada Border Services Agency Export Distribution Centre Upfront relief of GST/HST on certain imports and domestic purchases Canada Revenue Agency Exporters of Processing Services Upfront relief of GST/HST on certain imports and domestic purchases Canada Revenue Agency INTRODUCTION • Providing “one-window” access to the five federal programs, as well as to other public sector (federal, provincial, and local) and private sector trade facilitation services (legal, customs brokers, transportation, etc.) • Supporting provincial and federal objectives to attract investment, reduce trade barriers, support jobs and expand trade in both goods and services. • Leveraging the FTZ Point designation and the “one-window” access to effectively brand Sault Ste. Marie as a major international trade gateway. – Outside investors are familiar with the concept and some are looking specifically for areas with a Foreign Trade Zone . – The FTZ Point can be a powerful component of developing brand awareness as an international trade corridor/gateway. Figure 1: Federal FTZ Programs for Importers/Exporters - 158 - 5 SAULT STE. MARIE FTZ POINT PROPOSAL Sault Ste . Marie is positioned at the centre of the Great Lakes Economy, a highly integrated trading zone that accounts for more than 50% of all U.S./ Canadian bilateral border trade and over 200 million tons of cargo shipped annually. The region, made up of 10 U.S. states and two provinces has a GDP of US$6 trillion – making it the third largest economy in the world. (Source: Council of the Great Lakes Region). This region is attractive to companies in numerous industries and sectors . Foreign Trade Zone Point designation can make Sault Ste. Marie more attractive for these and other companies . The overriding goals for achieving designation for Sault Ste. Marie as an FTZ Point include: • To become a Northern Ontario focal point for international trade • To significantly strengthen international trade for existing businesses in the region • To attract new businesses and investment to Sault Ste . Marie that engage in international trade activities. Achievement of these overall goals will help to strengthen and diversify Sault Ste. Marie’s economic base. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES The specific objectives for becoming a designated FTZ Point include the following: 1. To enhance the visibility of Sault Ste. Marie as a Foreign Trade Zone 2. To establish a one-window seamless foreign trade service point 3. To strengthen Sault Ste. Marie’s positioning on the investment attraction “map” and enhance promotion of the region for investment attraction 4. To enhance collaboration among the region’s trade and investment attraction partners 5. To provide enhanced government outreach to the community vis-a-vis foreign trade 6. To be an important interface between government and businesses STRATEGIC ATTRIBUTES/ FEATURES As part of the formal application process for designation as an FTZ Point, we have summarized 13 key strategic attributes and features of Sault Ste. Marie . 1. An Economic Priority for the Region International trade has been identified as an important priority by the SSMEDC in its Strategic Plan, 2019 Business Plan, on its website(s) as well as in associated investment attraction marketing and promotional materials . The SSMEDC has a senior-level staff member in the position of Manager of Trade, Investment & Community Marketing who is actively promoting Sault Ste . Marie and targeting leads for foreign and domestic direct investment. Attention is also focused on helping companies achieve growth through exporting and accessing new markets and fostering international relationships . Sault Ste . Marie has had success in the past with international and other investment attraction. We continue to work to make Sault Ste. Marie even more attractive demonstrated by major international investments made in local companies such as: • Essar Group, a subsidiary of India-based Essar, purchased Algoma Steel in 2007 ($1.8 billion purchase + $500 million investment) • KKR & Company which purchased the 60-megawatt solar farms project in the Sault ($300 million investment) • Brookfield Prince Windmill Project ($400 million investment) • Tenaris Algoma Tubes, a manufacturer of seamless and welded steel pipe products ($30 million investment) • Heliene Canada, a manufacturer of photovoltaic solar panels ($6.5 million investment) • Arauco N.A., which purchased and operates a medium density fibreboard mill - 159 - 6 SAULT STE. MARIE FTZ POINT PROPOSAL • Agero operates a contact centre in Sault Ste . Marie, providing roadside assistance services on behalf of major U.S. car manufacturers. • Noront Resources Ltd. has announced a $1 billion project to build a ferrochrome production facility in Sault Ste . Marie In November 2018, Algoma Steel Inc. emerged from CCAA, after being purchased by a new operating group. There was strong local, provincial and federal government commitment to the restructuring and modernization of Algoma Steel which relies heavily on international trade and cross-border flows of goods and services. The new company is planning hundreds of millions of dollars in investment and upgrades. International consultant KPMG ranked Sault Ste . Marie in the top tier in Ontario in its International Competitive Analysis, which support’s the SSMEDC’s emphasis on attracting international investment. Combining this and other strengths with an FTZ Point designation will make Sault Ste. Marie an even more attractive location for investment. A joint economic growth agreement with Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan endorses establishment of a Foreign Trade Zone Point . There is an existing Foreign Trade Zone in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan. The SSMEDC board of directors, City Council and numerous partners and stakeholders support the designation as an FTZ Point . This is in recognition of the potential for contributing to the strength of the regional, provincial and national economies as the only FTZ Point in Northern Ontario. 2. Private Sector Leadership and Commitment The Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation is the local economic development agency which has a private sector led board of directors. The SSMEDC has spearheaded this initiative to establish the community as a designated FTZ Point. SSMEDC worked with the Sault Ste. Marie Transportation Infrastructure Committee, a committee of City Council, as they explored the feasibility of pursuing the FTZ Point designation and expanding international trade efforts . The committee is made up of private sector representatives such as Algoma Steel, Purvis Marine and Multimodal, Cole International (customs brokers), Tenaris Algoma Tubes and more. The committee fully supports our efforts . See Appendix A for other letters of support . 3. Dedicated Governance Body It is proposed that the Sault Ste . Marie FTZ Point will have a dedicated FTZ Point Task Force as its governing body. Details of governance and organizational structure are provided below. This FTZ Point Task Force will interface with the SSMEDC as this would be the organization with operational responsibility for the FTZ Point. SSMEDC Board of Directors SSMEDC Executive Director FTZ Point Task ForceSSM International Trade Network SSMEDC Staff Figure 2: FTZ Point Overall Governance - 160 - 7 SAULT STE. MARIE FTZ POINT PROPOSAL 4. Local and Provincial Government Support to Participate in the FTZ Task Force The City of Sault Ste . Marie through its City Council is fully supportive of this initiative. SSMEDC has also worked with its provincial partners at the Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines to complete our application . The FTZ designation supports provincial objectives to support jobs, grow international trade, and facilitate access to all levels of government and local service providers by offering a single window with a continuum of services to build export capacity, encourage first-time exporters and de-risk entry into international markets . SSMEDC will utilize existing staff, office space and resources to deliver FTZ programming, coordination and promotion . This designation and associated activities will complement existing investment attraction efforts, business retention and expansion work and business support services offered by SSMEDC. FTZ Task Force Participants SSMEDC Sault Ste . Marie Airport Development Corporation City of Sault Ste . Marie Export Development Canada Canada Revenue Agency Canada Border Services Agency FedNor Global Affairs Canada Sault Ste. Marie Bridge Authority Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines Transport Canada Private sector business leaders The FTZ Task Force provides the “one-window” access to key officials in order to expedite access to the five federal Foreign Trade Zone programs. The Task Force will include representatives from multiple agencies and the private sector: Although companies anywhere in Canada can apply directly to these programs, the FTZ Point Task Force provides additional value to local and potential investor companies: • The FTZ Point Task Force can promote these programs to local companies and inward investors who might otherwise not know they exist . • The Task Force can help companies that might not know how to find the right department, agency, or official for a given program. • The Task Force also provides transparency and accountability in the process of accessing program supports, and is a mechanism to follow up and possibly expedite applications in process. • The Task Force will be driven by SSMEDC and made up of federal, provincial, and local government officials from appropriate departments and agencies, business leaders, and key service providers. The Task force will meet quarterly or as needed to assist companies . • A broader ‘Trade Leadership Network’ (built around, or alongside the FTZ Point Task Force) can provide an access point for other trade support programs and private sector support services (e.g. freight forwarders, trade finance, customs brokers, legal, etc.). Figure 3: FTZ Task Force Participants - 161 - 8 SAULT STE. MARIE FTZ POINT PROPOSAL 5. Favorable Business Environment There are several factors that are indicative of a favorable business environment in Sault Ste. Marie, including the following: • An internationally-linked manufacturing sector . Restructuring of Algoma Steel is now complete and undertaking upgrading and expansion . • Noront Resources Ltd. has announced a $1 billion project to build a ferrochrome production facility in Sault Ste . Marie . • Several other major companies and industries are experiencing strong business conditions. • Both Sault College and Algoma University are growing enrollment and completing significant building projects. • A robust local and regional tourism industry. The tourism sector continues to be an ongoing major component of the economy and has been experiencing stable market conditions. • Strategic location and proximity to major North American markets . Sault Ste . Marie is located at the centre of the Great Lakes economy which, according to the Council of the Great Lakes Region, is a highly integrated trading zone encompassing more than 50% of all U.S./Canadian bilateral border trade and over 200 million tons of cargo shipped annually . The region includes 10 U .S . states and two provinces, with a total GDP of US$6 trillion. Our strategic location within this region is illustrated in the map of Figure 4 . • Overall costs of doing business are highly competitive. Sault Ste. Marie offers numerous cost benefits over business operations in larger cities. This includes quality talent and expertise at an affordable rate, low business operating costs, and low costs for land acquisition and real estate. Businesses in the city also have access to financial incentives and programs. • In 2016, Sault Ste. Marie ranked 10th globally out of 111 cities in KPMG’s Competitive Alternatives study which examined competitive business cost structure . • Competitive utility rates with high degree of reliability. Sault Ste. Marie is well-serviced by local and provincial utility companies and agencies with low to average costs relative to other Ontario municipalities . • Electricity – Sault Ste . Marie offers the lowest cost of electricity in northern Ontario and has surplus reliable power with uninterrupted back- up capabilities. Hydro One Sault Ste. Marie is the second largest electricity transmitter in Ontario and recently announced $40 million in infrastructure upgrades . The Sault Ste . Marie area generates approximately 1,200 megawatts of electricity, mostly from clean, renewable sources such as solar, wind and hydroelectric – enough to power several hundred thousand homes. • The Sault Ste. Marie Public Utilities Commission is breaking ground in 2019 on the first community- wide smart grid project and largest battery storage project in Canada. This will lead to greater resiliency, reliability and lower electricity prices for business and industry in Sault Ste. Marie – making us even more competitive. 250KM 500KM 750KM Sault Ste. Marie Chicago Milwaukee Detroit Windsor Sarnia London Hamilton Toronto Brampton Barrie Orillia KitchenerWaterloo OwenSound Toledo Columbus Pittsburgh Buffalo St. Catherines Oshawa Kingston Peterborough Ottawa Cleveland NiagaraFalls Elliot Lake Sudbury North Bay TimminsThunder Bay St. Paul, Minneapolis Figure 4: Sault Ste. Marie – Strategic Location - 162 - 9 SAULT STE. MARIE • Water – The Public Utilities Commission operates a direct water filtration plant with a peak capacity of 60,000 m3/day, and provisions already made to double this capacity in future. Water for industrial purposes is also available from area lakes and rivers. • Natural Gas – Sault Ste. Marie is serviced by Union Gas, a major Canadian natural gas storage, transmission and distribution company. • Sault Ste. Marie offers extensive business support and startup resources . In addition to federal and provincial government business support agencies with offices in the Sault (such as FedNor, Business Development Bank of Canada, and NOHFC) several local organizations provide expertise and support for local industries and businesses: – Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation – Sault Ste. Marie Innovation Centre – Millworks Centre for Entrepreneurship – Sault Ste. Marie Chamber of Commerce – Community Development Corporation of Sault Ste . Marie and Area . • SSMEDC is an independent not-for-profit agency and the lead organization in the community with respect to economic development. SSMEDC supports existing businesses and attracts external businesses to create jobs and increase the municipal tax base. It achieves this by promoting the city’s strategic advantages to businesses around the world . • Sault Ste. Marie Innovation Centre (SSMIC) functions as a catalyst for economic development and diversification in the information technology and knowledge-based sectors. Beyond supporting the growth and development of local science and technology companies, SSMIC operates an internationally recognized, award-winning community geomatics centre (ACORN). 6. Available Land The Invest Sault Ste. Marie website tracks available commercial and industrial properties and, as of June 2019, showed an inventory of 103 commercial and industrial properties available for sale or lease, including 330 acres of prime airport lands for sale in four parcels, each already serviced to the property line . The Community Improvement Plan and the Downtown Community Improvement Plan show the City’s commitment to enhancing commercial and industrial lands and buildings with appropriate planning and zoning policies, as well as business incentives for enhancement . FTZ POINT PROPOSAL 7. High Quality Infrastructure Sault Ste . Marie is located at the heart of the Great Lakes, sharing a border with Michigan, and providing access via air, rail, road and ship. This locational advantage ensures rapid and economical transportation of people, raw materials and information to markets globally, including access to 60 million consumers within 800 KM . Essential for enhancing international trade, the city has high quality transportation and communications infrastructure, as summarized in the following paragraphs . • Access to Highway System Infrastructure Sault Ste . Marie has direct access to Canadian markets via Highway 17 (part of the Trans-Canada Highway), which links to the east coast, west coast and to Southern Ontario via Highway 400. Direct access to the U.S. market is provided by Interstate Highway I-75 located across the International Bridge. - 163 - 10 SAULT STE. MARIE • Air Infrastructure and Access The Sault Ste . Marie Airport features unrestricted landing (24 hours) with category five certification. The site boasts two 6,000 ft. x 200 ft. runways with approval in place for a 2,000 ft. extension. Sault Ste. Marie is connected to major international air travel hubs by several airlines offering multiple daily scheduled flights, including: – Air Canada with multiple daily non-stop flights to/from Toronto International Airport (Canada’s busiest and largest airport), which has numerous U .S . and worldwide daily non-stop connections . – Porter Airlines, with multiple daily flights to/ from Toronto Island Airport which offers non- stop connections to Ottawa, Montreal, Quebec City, Moncton, Halifax, St. John’s, Thunder Bay, Sudbury, New York, Boston and Chicago. – Bearskin Airlines, which flies direct to Winnipeg, Thunder Bay, Sudbury, Timmins, Ottawa and numerous other locations in Northern Ontario and Manitoba. – Delta Airlines flights from nearby Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, which connect daily with Detroit Metro Airport . – Sault Ste. Marie Airport has two fixed base operators capable of servicing scheduled and charter aircraft, including jets up to the size of a Boeing 737. Sault Airport is also a major base for the Province’s forest fire fighting service. • Rail Access and Infrastructure Sault Ste . Marie has rail access to the North American marketplace via Canadian National, Canadian Pacific and Huron Central railways. – These routes provide coast-to-coast service with access to manufacturing facilities in Canada and the United States . – With a rail bridge crossing the St. Mary’s River into Michigan, Sault Ste. Marie also has direct rail access to more than 10,000 U.S. route-miles with linkages to major U.S. cities such as Detroit, Minneapolis, Chicago, Milwaukee and Duluth. • Marine and Port Infrastructure Sault Ste . Marie has a Seaway-depth marine port located at Algoma Steel on the St. Lawrence Seaway system, which serves a region of 95 million people accounting for about 45 percent of the U.S. manufacturing base. There are plans underway to expanded and modernize capacity . The port and nearby Sault Locks can accommodate 1,000-foot freighters used on the Great Lakes, as well as ocean going vessels. More than 94 million net tons of freight moves through the Sault Locks each year. Work has also commenced on the development of a new super lock to accommodate vessels on the upper lakes . • Communications Infrastructure Sault Ste. Marie offers an advanced communication infrastructure to suit the needs of any project. The unique geographic location of the community located directly on the U.S. border provides the ability for redundant access to major American telecommunication backbones. The city has the only fibre optic connection to the U.S. located on the upper Great Lakes via the Sault Ste. Marie International Bridge. This is a unique advantage to locating a business in Sault Ste. Marie. The region is served by three independent broadband carriers each offering OC192 network lines with 10Gbps and GbE capacity, so it can meet the Information and communication technology needs of any company . FTZ POINT PROPOSAL - 164 - 11 SAULT STE. MARIE 8. Active Participation in and Connection to Global Supply Chains There are a range of companies that are an active part of the North American and/or global supply chains, including both manufacturing and service companies . These companies make use of domestic and imported inputs and export various goods and services. Examples include: Steel Manufacturing and Fabrication Algoma Steel is the third largest integrated steel manufacturer in North America and produces various grades of steel sheets and plates to service the automotive industry, energy sector, bridge construction and more . • Tenaris Algoma Tubes manufactures seamless pipe used by the oil and energy sectors. • SIS Manufacturing produces custom steel products including large welded beams for bridge and overpass construction, and is the largest manufacturer of train chassis in North America . The bulk of their products are exported to the U.S. • Many more steel fabricators and re-manufacturers exist including Soo Foundry & Machine, China Steel Inc., and Rector Machine Works. • Sault Ste. Marie also boasts a growing defense sector including steel fabricators and other companies having controlled goods certifications. Forestry and Forest Products Sault Ste. Marie continues to be a significant forestry production and export centre with companies like Arauco N.A. producing high quality medium density fibreboard, EACOM producing engineered wood products, Boniferro Millworks (hardwood lumber) and Bioforest Technologies (Lallemand) among others. • Sault Ste. Marie is the headquarters of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources' Forest Division staff, and three forest research centres including the Ontario Forest Research Centre, Great Lakes Forestry Centre (federal) and provincial Invasive Species Centre . • Valuable cutting-edge research and development in Sault Ste. Marie at these institutions builds national and international knowledge and expertise in forestry and related scientific and environmental issues . Other Manufacturing Area manufacturers produce other products that are exported to new markets, including solar panels, industrial filters, food products and even beer. • Heliene Canada is a solar panel manufacturer based in Sault Ste. Marie which imports components and exports finished panels mainly throughout North America . • Main Filter Inc . manufactures a full range of Hydraulic Filter products using only top industry component and material providers in the construction of their filter elements. They produce a wide variety of replacement and custom filter elements, in any combination of materials to suit client needs, including cellulose filter elements, micro-fiberglass filter elements, stainless steel wire cloth filter elements, critical protection high pressure filter elements, specialty material and custom media filter elements. Smart Energy, Clean Tech and Renewable Energy The Sault and area produces nearly 1,200 MW of electricity including wind (250 MW), solar (60 MW), hydro (203 MW) and co-generation (110 MW feeding Algoma Steel) directly in Sault Ste. Marie. The city has also become an important venue for experimental energy and clean tech projects, including gasification of waste, reverse polymerization of tires, smart grid technology, and a 7 MW battery energy storage project with Convergent Energy. • Heliene Canada is a solar panel manufacturer is based in Sault Ste. Marie which exports panels mainly throughout North America . • The Sault Ste. Marie Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has initiated a $33 million community-wide smart grid project with Infrastructure Energy LLC, as well as a 48MW energy storage system, the largest of its kind in Canada. These two projects will create a more resilient, reliable and intelligent electrical system for Sault Ste. Marie, and will significantly lower electricity costs (up to 20%) for large and mid-sized businesses. FTZ POINT PROPOSAL - 165 - 12 SAULT STE. MARIE FTZ POINT PROPOSAL Lottery and Gaming Industry Sault Ste. Marie is the headquarters of the Ontario Lottery & Gaming Corporation - one of the largest gaming organizations in North America. For over 20 years expertise on operating and growing Ontario's lottery business has been developing in Sault Ste. Marie and a cluster of businesses servicing the lottery and gaming sector naturally continues to develop. Companies like Canadian Bank Note, Pollard Banknote and Brooks Marketing are based in Sault Ste. Marie or have a presence here supporting lottery game development, operations and promotion. Digital Economy Sault Ste. Marie's growing IT and digital economy sector is comprised of software development, web development, business process outsourcing, digital marketing, app development, game development and cloud-based software companies. Some examples include business process software company Workiva, online media company Village Media, Insightworks (online training and onboarding), Microsoft 365 technical support firm Createch, Canada Bank Note, SSI System Solutions, Lucidia, Miramar, Cavera and others . • Local digital companies enjoy lower labour costs, overall operating costs, and affordable leasing/ rental costs for office space. • The Sault Ste. Marie Innovation Centre works closely to support local science and technology companies from startup through growth . Aviation/Aerospace Sector Aviation focused companies include J D Aero, Springer Aerospace, Humphrey Aviation, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Air Services, Sault College aviation program, World Fuels, AvJet Fuels and other companies. J D Aero provides aircraft maintenance, repairs and overhaul services for airlines in Canada and overseas, including Air Canada Jazz, Air New Zealand, Austrian Airlines and Porter Airlines. There are over 1,000 acres of commercial/ industrial land available for development adjacent to the Sault Ste . Marie airport . 9. Access to a Skilled Labour Force In recognition of the importance of having a diversified, highly skilled labour force available to support existing and future businesses, the City of Sault Ste. Marie has hired a full-time Labour Force Coordinator to make labour force development a priority under its Future Sault Ste. Marie initiative. The Coordinator is actively working with local companies to identify and promote job opportunities, as well as attending career fairs and newcomer job fairs around the province. Visit www.welcometossm.com. Sault Ste . Marie has a highly skilled workforce and access to hundreds of new graduates annually from local post-secondary educational institutions . The existing labour market encompasses a multiplicity of skills including: technical, manufacturing, and related trades; information technology; sales and service; business and management; scientific and research and development. Additional strengths related to the labour force include: • Access to training and education . Sault Ste . Marie is serviced by three post-secondary institutions, with Algoma University and Sault College in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario and Lake Superior State University just across the International Bridge in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan. • With a combined enrollment of over 6,000, Algoma University and Sault College offer a wide range of degree and diploma courses in disciplines, such as Digital and Graphic Design, Human Resources, Business, IT and Computer Science, Gaming Technology and Hospitality and the Culinary Arts . • Sault College and Algoma University generate over 1,200 graduates every year who are armed with the skills to succeed . • Based on employment, Sault Ste. Marie has the largest manufacturing sector in Northern Ontario, even greater than Sudbury and Thunder Bay, which have larger populations. Almost half of this workforce is under the age of 45 . • Low unemployment rate and high participation rate indicate a vibrant economy. In 2018 Sault Ste. Marie had a low unemployment rate of 4 .2 per cent in September of 2018. The community also had a high labour force participation rate (64.3 per cent) and employment rate (61.6 per cent) in 2018, significantly higher than a year earlier. - 166 - 13 SAULT STE. MARIE 10. Access to a Multimodal Transportation System Sault Ste . Marie has good access to all passenger and freight transportation modes – road, rail, air and marine. Facilities are available for direct intermodal transfers of freight including the following: truck to/ from rail, marine and air; rail to/from truck and marine; air to/from truck; and marine to/from rail and truck. Large industrial companies like Algoma Steel are serviced directly by marine, rail and truck, as needed. Other important features and attributes of the region’s multi-modal transportation system include: • Access to major highway networks – Sault Ste. Marie has direct access to Canadian markets via Highway 17 (part of the Trans-Canada Highway), which links to the east coast, west coast and to Southern Ontario via Highway 400. Just across the International Bridge, where wait times are a fraction of what they are at southern Ontario border crossings, Interstate-75 provides direct access to a large portion of the U .S . • Sault Ste . Marie has rail access to much of the North American marketplace via Canadian National, Canadian Pacific and Huron Central railways. These routes provide coast-to-coast service with access to manufacturing facilities in Canada and the United States . • The Sault Airport has 24-hour capability and is well-connected to other cities in Northern Ontario and major hub airports in Toronto. Also, service to U.S. airports in Detroit and Minneapolis-St. Paul is available from the nearby airport in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan (Chippewa County International Airport). • The Algoma Docks is currently the 4th largest port on the Canadian Great Lakes (by volume), handling approximately 500 vessels a year and is strategically located by the Sault Locks on the St. Lawrence Seaway System. • The Sault Multimodal Terminal, located 0.5km from the International Bridge (border with U.S.) is a secure facility providing multimodal warehousing (rail to truck or truck to rail), inventory control, freight and customs brokerage services and more. • Soo Van and Storage provides fully customized inventory and warehousing services including Customs Bonded Warehousing. • There are additional warehousing and storage facilities throughout the community, including Traders Steel Warehouse which houses and supplies the largest inventory of new steel in the Algoma District. • There are a number of customs brokers available in Sault Ste . Marie including Cole International and Near North Customs Brokers. There also customs brokers available on the U.S. side. • The J M Longyear wood yard is located near the northern city limits of Sault Ste. Marie and provides for trans-loading of timber for shipment to the U.S. and other locations . • Sault Ste . Marie is located near the centre point of the Trans-Canada Highway. In addition, the community has a non-disruptive and efficient border point to the United States, along with direct access to U.S. Interstate-75 (a four-lane highway) that extends from Michigan to Florida and links to the U .S . Interstate highway system . • With access to both the Canadian Pacific and Canadian National Railway, Sault Ste. Marie is connected to rail from coast-to-coast across Canada and across the international train bridge to Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan and into the continental United States (through Chicago). • Sault Ste. Marie and area is serviced by two regional airports, one in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario and the other 15 minutes south of Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan . FTZ POINT PROPOSAL - 167 - 14 SAULT STE. MARIE 11. Existing Investment Attraction and Marketing Through its Invest Sault Ste. Marie program, the SSMEDC focuses on positioning and marketing the community as an ideal location to establish and grow a business. The goal of this initiative is to attract business and investment by enhancing the Sault’s economic development capacity and performance in key sectors. The focus of the program is two pronged: developing a solid foundation towards creating opportunities for local business and enhancing investment attraction programming for the community. To attract external business and investment, the SSMEDC undertakes strategic marketing campaigns, attends trade shows and makes pitches to external companies and investors. Digital marketing campaigns and lead generation are focused on targeting American and European firms in advanced manufacturing, smart energy and digital steel . SSMEDC hosts foreign delegations and companies for inbound exploratory visits. There were four visits in 2018, including representatives from the Czech Republic, South Africa, Australia and the United States . Under its Invest Sault Ste. Marie program, the SSMEDC also assists existing business clients to enter export markets . In 2017, SSMEDC partnered with its sister city, Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan to create a bi-national community bid and marketing campaign for Amazon’s HQ2 headquarters. The campaign garnered a significant amount of national and international media coverage. In May 2019, Noront Resources Ltd. announced they selected Sault Ste . Marie as the site of the company’s $1 billion ferrochrome production facility, due to the city’s location, cost structure and existing supply chain. The project, which will be developed over 10 years, is expected to employ up to 1,500 for construction and 300-500 full-time positions to operate the facility . The ferrochrome production facility FTZ POINT PROPOSAL will process chromite mined in the Ring of Fire (far north Ontario), and create ferrochrome which will be exported to the U .S . for the production of stainless steel. The SSMEDC expects this will further attract secondary manufacturing and new investments to the community and region . 12. Start-up Visa Program In 2018, SSMEDC’s Millworks Centre for Entrepreneurship small business incubator facility was accepted as the first hub in Northern Ontario to offer the Government of Canada’s Start-up Visa Program . The program is intended to attract foreign entrepreneurs who wish to establish new, high growth businesses in Canada that will support innovation and job creation. Under this program, Millworks can assist entrepreneurs to receive a start-up visa from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada under the business incubation stream. The program has seen considerable interest and over 100 applications since its launch. A sub-committee vets applications and moves potential candidates through the process. The Start-up Visa Program is another example of how SSMEDC is working to attract new high-potential businesses and entrepreneurs to the region. 13. Rural and Northern Immigration Program In June 2019, Sault Ste. Marie was one of 11 communities across Canada selected to take part in a federal immigration pilot project. The city now has additional tools to help address skilled labour shortages and grow the population. Along with increased immigration and a flow of skilled newcomers to the area, will come additional opportunities for new businesses and business connections with international markets . This program will likely lead to new importing/exporting opportunities, and utilization of FTZ programs. - 168 - 15 SAULT STE. MARIE IMPLEMENTING FTZ POINT Three phases for development and implementation of the FTZ Point have been identified and require different skills and leadership from different partners in Sault Ste. Marie. Overall staff leadership and coordination for these phases will be provided by Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation with the assistance of stakeholders . The three phases are as follows: PHASE 1: Preparing for the FTZ Point Designation This first phase is focused on clarifying the roles and responsibilities of the various partners, ensuring broad-based business community support, and writing the application for the FTZ Point . PHASE 2: Promoting the FTZ Point Phase two includes preparing for acceptance as a designated FTZ Point, planning and coordination of any public announcements and preparation of initial marketing and promotional materials for the program . PHASE 3: Operationalizing and Leveraging the FTZ Point Designation The most successful FTZ Points are integrated into the overall economic development efforts, leverage the FTZ Point as a differentiator, and a support for the community’s brand. Phase 3 would include launching the FTZ Point Task force, integrating the FTZ Point into marketing and business retention programs (the FTZ Point will be prominent in investment attraction materials), activating a Trade Leadership Network and potential co-marketing efforts with Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan through the bi-national investment district project. NEXT STEPS Upon notification of successful FTZ Point designation by the federal government: 1. Develop initial materials to promote the FTZ Point. The program will be highlighted on www.investsaultstemarie.com and in any regular communications with the local business community. A strong presentation will be prepared to explain the FTZ Point program and how it will positively impact the community. An information brochure will be developed that all partners and staff dealing with business clients can display and distribute. 2. Stage information sessions for the business community. These seminars will be effective for sharing information about the FTZ Point, promoting the use of the FTZ programs, and answering questions. They will also help to raise the profile of the programming . 3. Form the FTZ Point Task Force and provide staff support for implementation. The Task Force will be as prescribed in Figure 3 – Task Force Participants. Although more meetings may be needed early on, it is expected that the FTZ Point Task Force will meet approximately quarterly to review new requests to the program and to review progress on these files. 4. Integrate the FTZ Point into marketing and business retention programs. An SSMEDC staff person will become the in-house expert on FTZ programs. The FTZ Point will also be prominent in the community’s branding materials. 5. Integrate the FTZ Point into a broader Trade Leadership Network. This structure, described earlier in this report, can help identify gaps in the trade support/facilitation infrastructure, and coordinate trade facilitation programs across the broader region. 6. Engage in potential joint marketing efforts with counterparts on the U.S./Michigan side of the border. This might take the form of a Bi-national Sault Ste . Marie International Trade Gateway that both sides can market to their respective clients. 7. Undertake monitoring and evaluation of implementation progress. This will be an ongoing process and entail systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of the FTZ Point. - 169 - 16 SAULT STE. MARIE CONCLUSION Sault Ste. Marie is a city built on a long, proud history of manufacturing and harnessing the area’s abundant natural resources. The community’s legacy as a hub for industry and trade endures to this day with a highly developed advanced manufacturing sector, cutting-edge forest research, world-leading lottery and gaming expertise with the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation, and a rapidly growing smart energy sector . The city’s strategic location on the US border allows for easy access to shipping and transportation via the Great Lakes, Trans-Canada Highway, I-75 in the USA, rail and air . Its close proximity to the Port of Algoma (Algoma Docks), which offers a deep sea port for shipping and receiving marine cargo, provides access to global markets and 60 million North American customers within only 800 KM . Companies have access to various government incentives for manufacturing, technology, innovation, training, site acquisition and infrastructure – supporting continued growth . Sault Ste. Marie is a vibrant community with endless four-season destination activities. With affordable living and a close-knit community, employees can live in their ideal neighbourhoods while enjoying short commute times and access to plenty of family activities, providing a healthy work-life balance. Ranked 10th globally for competitiveness (KPMG 2016 Competitive Alternatives study) Sault Ste. Marie holds considerable opportunity for growth and development. The area is home to Algoma University, Sault College and Lake Superior State University (Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan), giving employers access to newly-trained professionals and skilled workers at competitive labour costs. Sault Ste. Marie, with its location on the Great Lakes, access to the U.S. market, natural resources, energy production and manufacturing has long been an international trading hub. There is so much more potential . The SSMEDC is working with our colleagues in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan to develop a Bi-National Investment District. This would be a specialized strategic rural United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) investment hub, which would promote bi-national investment in a market that has been historically distant from larger urban trade centres . The two regions are working collaboratively to plan and leverage the region’s resources as an integrated investment region. Numerous initiatives will be investigated to capture these opportunities such as the integration of supply chains in the region; the development and implantation of an integrated bi- national workforce development strategy; and the creation of an infrastructure/utility plan that is dictated by the region’s economic development strategy. Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan has an existing Foreign Trade Zone, which in the United States are specific to designated physical zones. The city’s economic development agency has applied to the U.S. federal government to have their FTZ expanded to the entire Chippewa County which would provide additional advantages for businesses county-wide. - 170 - 17 SAULT STE. MARIE CONCLUSION Through this initiative, SSMEDC will be working to build awareness, and improve the availability of information to businesses in Sault Ste. Marie, to assist them in fully capitalizing on the benefits of the Foreign Trade Zone programs and the FTZ Point designation . Significant trade (imports and exports) is happening through existing business and industry, however, the SSMEDC would like to increase trade, attract additional business and investment, and improve awareness of the government of Canada’s Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) programs. There are more than 50 local companies already involved in international trade activities, and more than 30 additional companies with interest in developing new international markets. SSMEDC intends to promote FTZ programming at regular information sessions for the business community, as well as part of other exporting and international market development seminars. Dan Hollingsworth Executive Director 705-759-5428 | d .hollingsworth@ssmedc .ca www.investsaultstemarie.com An FTZ Point designation aligns well with SSMEDC’s investment attraction strategy and will help Sault Ste. Marie and area attract even more investment, industry and opportunities . Sault Ste . Marie is the gateway to Northern Ontario and SSMEDC looks forward to leveraging this and associated activities to make a greater impact in our business community. The designation will be a valuable tool for promoting Sault Ste. Marie to inbound missions and during outbound missions in the USA, Germany and other countries . The Foreign Trade Zone Point designation is the next step for our community to be seen as a gateway to international trade . It will help put Sault Ste . Marie on the map for foreign investment. - 171 - 18 SAULT STE. MARIE Letters and Resolutions of Support Sault Ste. Marie FTZ Point Application APPENDIX A - 172 - SAULT STE. MARIE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Board of Directors’ Meeting Monday, March 18, 2019 Russ Ramsay Board Room – Third Level – Civic Centre 11:30 am. AGENDA ITEM 4.2 Moved by: K. Wyer Seconded by: P. Shukla Be it resolved that the Board of Director’s approve staff to proceed with next steps as outlined in the attached report as Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3, including forming the FTZ Task Force. CARRIED. Terry Rainone President - 173 - Agenda Number: Title: Date: Moved by: Seconded by: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 7.1.1 Support for Foreign Trade Zone Point Designation Application Monday, April 15, 2019 Councillor M. Scott Councillor L. Vezeau-Allen Resolved that the report of the Chief Administrative Officer dated 2019 04 15 be received and that Council indicate its support of the Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation pursuing the designation of Foreign Trade Zone Point for Sault Ste. Marie. Tied, Defeated I Christian Provenzano Defeated Officially Read and Not Dealt With;#Postponed - 174 - May 1, 2019 Dan Hollingsworth, Executive Director Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation 99 Foster Drive, Level 1 Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5X6 RE: Foreign Trade Zone Point Designation Dear Dan: We are pleased to endorse and support the Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation's application to FedNor to see the City of Sault Ste. Marie designated as a Foreign Trade Zone point. Such a designation would assist Sault Ste. Marie in its efforts to promote the City for investment attraction and international trade, as well as creating a one-window approach to help existing businesses take advantage of the valuable programs offered through the Foreign Trade Zone program. The Sault Ste. Marie Innovation Centre is a regionally oriented organization focusing on growing regional strength in science and technology industries and businesse. This type of initiative provides another building block in a value proposition for our region. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 705-942-7927, X3152 or pbruijns@ssmic.com if you require anything further. Peter Bruijns Executive Director PB/aw _;s 99 Foster Drive, Level 6, Sault Ste. Marie, ON PGA 5X6 Phone: 705-942-7927 Fax: 705-942-6169 www.ssmic.com - 175 - May 15, 2019 Dan Hollingsworth Executive Director Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation 99 Foster Drive Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5X6 RE: Foreign Trade Zone Point Designation Dear Dan Hollingsworth: Algoma University is pleased to endorse and support the Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation’s application through FedNor to see the City of Sault Ste. Marie designated as a Foreign Trade Zone Point by the Government of Canada. As a community leader in higher education, we applaud your ongoing efforts to stimulate business investment to strengthen our local and regional economy. Algoma University has an aggressive growth mandate and one critical element to our long-term success is the expansion of local and regional labour markets to support the needs of our growing student population. The success of your application and the positive impact the FTZ designation will have on business activity will undoubtedly serve as driver of labour market activity. This is crucial for the short- and long-term success of both the City of Sault Ste. Marie and Algoma University. Thanks once again for your continued efforts to attract business investment for our city while promoting Sault Ste. Marie as an international trade gateway. Securing the Foreign Trade Zone Point designation will be another important milestone and we look forward to a positive response to your application. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any additional information in support of your application. Kindest regards, Asima Vezina, President & Vice-Chancellor 1520 Queen Street E • Sault Ste . Mane , Ontario • Canada P6A 2G4 • www.algomau.ca ~ P 705-949 -2301 • F 705 -949-6583 • TOLL FREE IN CANADA 1-888-ALGOMAU r '\' ~,~ 1 F ' - 176 - SIS MANUFACTURING SIS Manufacturing 1231 Peoples Road Sau lt St e . Marie, On t ario P6C 3W7 Tel : {705) 759 -5148, Fax: {705) 759-4816 www.s isgrou p.ca Re: Fore ign Trade Zone Po int Des ignation Dan Hollingsworth Executive Director Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation 99 Foster Drive Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5X6 Dear Dan Hollingsworth: May 16, 2 019 We are pleased to endorse and support the Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation's application through Fed Nor to see the City of Sault Ste. Marie designated as a Foreign Trade Zone Point. Such a designation would assist Sault Ste. Marie in its efforts to promote the city for investment attraction and international trade , as well as creating a one-window approach to help existing business take advantage of the valuable programs offered through the Foreign Trade Zone program. As an importer and exporter of steel and steel fabricated products, we firmly believe the Free Trade Zone will provide SIS Manufacturing new opportunities to compete and grow our business internationally. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 705-297-4422 or email tony.coccimiglio@sisgroup.ca. Tony Coccimiglio General Manager - 177 - 1111, 940 Second Line West Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, P6C 2L3 Phone: 705-759-4800 Toll Free: 800-461-0525 Facsimile: 705-759-6775 Email: info@averyconstruction.ca Construction Limited & Transportation Services www .averyconstruction.ca <::..:: April 18 , 2019 Dan Hollingsworth Executive Director Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation 99 Foster Drive Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5X6 RE: Foreign Trade Zone Point Designation Dear Dan Hollingsworth : We at Avery's are pleased to endorse and support the Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation's application through Fed Nor to see the City of Sault Ste. Marie designated as a Foreign Trade Zone Point. Such a designation would assist Sault Ste . Marie in its efforts to promote the city for investment attraction and international trade, as well as creating a one-window approach to help existing business take advantage of the valuable programs offered through the Foreign Trade Zone program . Avery Construction and Transportation is involved in moving goods to and from the United States via truck and the Foreign Trade Zone Point Designation will enhance the business that we now do and allow us to expand our logistics operation. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 705-759 4800 or email jeff@averyconstruction .ca Sincerely , ~(S:i --- Jeff Avery President "A VERY RELIABLE CHOICE" - 178 - EaCole International R. Kevin Schwantz 120 Huron Street Sault Ste. Marie, On., P6A 1 P8 04/18/2019 Dan Hollingsworth Executive Director Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation 99 Foster Drive Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5X6 RE: Foreign Trade Zone Point Designation Dear Dan _ Hollingsworth : We are pleased to endorse and support the Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation's application through FedNor to see the City of Sault Ste. Marie designated as a Foreign Trade Zone Point. Such a designation would assist Sault Ste. Marie in its efforts to promote the city for investment attraction and international trade, as well as creating a one-window approach to help existing business take advantage of the valuable programs offered through the Foreign Trade Zone program. Cole International Inc-Customs Brokerage & Intl Freight Service Provider. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 705-254-6448 or email kevin .schwantz@co leintl.com. R. Kevin Schwantz Branch Manager -Customs . - 179 - Sault Ste. Marie Airport Development Corporation April 18, 2019 Dan Hollingsworth Executive Director Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation 99 Foster Drive Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5X6 RE: Foreign Trade Zone Point Designation Dear Dan Hollingsworth: We are pleased to endorse and support the Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation's application through Fed Nor to see the City of Sault Ste. Marie designated as a Foreign Trade Zone Point. Such a designation would assist Sault Ste. Marie in its efforts to promote the city for investment attraction and international trade, as well as creating a one-window approach to help existing business take advantage of the valuable programs offered through the Foreign Trade Zone program. Since its origin in 1961, the Sault Ste. Marie Airport has provided the vital air transportation link to the people and businesses of Sault Ste. Marie and the District of Algoma. Since assuming ownership and control of the Airport from the Federal government in 1998, the Sault Ste. Marie Airport Development Corporation (SSMADC) has strived to improve air transportation services for the community in a socially and fiscally responsible manner, while being progressive in its efforts to promote, develop and upgrade the Airport's lands and facilities. As such a Foreign Trade Zone Point should help to attract additional cargo opportunities for the airport, and therefore the SSMADC is very supportive of this initiative. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 705-257-9055 or email bost@saultairport.com . Sincerely, 4 ~ Terry Bos, AAE President and CEO 1-475 Airport Road, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 5K6 • Phone: (705) 779-3031 • Fax: (705) 779-3371 - 180 - 369 Queen Street East, Suite 1 Sault Ste. Marie, ON, P6A 1Z4 Dan Hollingsworth, Executive Director Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation 99 Foster Drive Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5X6 April 24, 2019 RE: Foreign Trade Zone Point Designation Dear Mr. Hollingsworth: As soon as a business starts operating internationally, there are many additional factors which can have a huge impact on its success. Exporting and importing goods is not just the core of any successful business; it also helps national and regional economies grow and expand. Once countries and regions start exporting, as well as importing goods, their economies begin developing greater capacity to create economic prosperity. Importing and exporting goods is not only important for businesses; it is important for individual consumers, too. Consumers can benefit from certain products or components that are not produced locally, but are available to purchase from a business abroad. Foreign Trade Zone Point Designation is an important component of developing our local export and import infrastructure that will advance the prosperity of Canada and Sault Ste. Marie. As the Sault Ste. Marie Chamber of Commerce, representing 700 members and 41% of the local workforce, we are pleased to endorse and support the Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation’s application through FedNor to see the City of Sault Ste. Marie designated as a Foreign Trade Zone Point. Respectfully, Don Mitchell, President Rory Ring, CEO «jcHAMiER ~ OF COMMERCE - 181 - 99 Foster Drive, Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5X6 saultstemarie.ca l 705.759.2500 l info@cityssm.on.ca The Corporation of the City of Sault Ste. Marie Transportation / Infrastructure Task Force Don Mitchell – Chair April 17, 2019 Dan Hollingsworth Executive Director Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation 99 Foster Drive Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5X6 RE: Foreign Trade Zone Point Designation Dear Dan Hollingsworth: We are pleased to endorse and support the Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation’s application through FedNor to see the City of Sault Ste. Marie designated as a Foreign Trade Zone Point. Such a designation would assist Sault Ste. Marie in its efforts to promote the city for investment attraction and international trade, as well as creating a one -window approach to help existing business take advantage of the valuable programs offered through the Foreign Trade Zone program. The mandate of the Transportation / Infrastructure Task Force (TITF) is to coordinate, investigate and facilitate activities for the City of Sault Ste. Marie’s multi-modal transportation / infrastructure priorities. As such, this designation would promote our city on the world stage, and enhance our efforts to compete with larger communities and showcase all we have to offer. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 705-943-1489 or by email: dmitchell@algomains.com. Sincerely, Don Mitchell, Chair SSM Transportation Infrastructure Committee - 182 - May 2 , 2019 Dan Hollingsworth Executive Director [rPML ~) :PURVIS MARINE LIMITED 1 PIM ST REET SAU LT STE. MARIE, ON P6A 3G3 T: 70 5-253-3038 F: 705-25 3-5232 www.purvismarine.com in.fo@ purvismarine.com Sault Ste . Marie Economic Development Corporation 99 Foster Drive Sault Ste. Marie , ON P6A 5X6 RE: Foreign Trade Zone Point Designation Dear Mr. Hollingsworth: Purvis Marine Limited and its subsidiary Sault Multimodal Terminal are pleased to endorse and support the Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation 's application through Fed Nor to see the City of Sault Ste. Marie designated as a Foreign Trade Zone Point. We recogn ize the important benefits of a Foreign Trade Zone Point as a means to enhance business and economic development in Sault Ste. Marie. Such a designation would assist Sault Ste. Mari e in its efforts to promote the city for investment attraction and international trade, as well as creating a one-window approach to help existing business take advantage of the valuable programs offered through the Foreign Trade Zone program. Sault Multimodal Terminal has the potential to be designated as a Customs Bonded Warehouse and it is certainly an opportunity that we wish to explore through the Foreign Trade Zone Point program. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 705-253-8325 or at sheila.purvis@purvismarine.com Sheila Purvis SHIP REPAIR~ DIVING ~ TUG & BARGE SERVICES ~ 24 HOUR SERVICE • - 183 - May 6th, 2019 Dan Hollingsworth Executive Director Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation 99 Foster Drive Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5X6 Foreign Trade Zone Point Designation Dear Dan Hollingsworth: We are pleased to endorse and support the Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation’s application through FedNor to see the City of Sault Ste. Marie designated as a Foreign Trade Zone Point. Such a designation would assist Sault Ste. Marie in its efforts to promote the city for investment attraction and international trade, as well as creating a one-window approach to help existing business take advantage of the valuable programs offered through the Foreign Trade Zone program. Sincerely, Michele Zucchetti Operations Senior Director TenarisAlgomaTubes !!!!!!!!! Tenaris TenarisAlgomaTubes 547 Wallace Terrace Sault Sainte Marie, ON P6C 1L9 www.tenaris.com - 184 - SAULT STE . MA RIE BRIDGE AUTHO RITY BRI DGE OF HI STO RY Pete r M. Peta inen 12 1 Huron St. SAULT S TE. MARIE .ONTARIO NATALIE K I NLOCH. CHAI R .. 11CH ELINE oueE. MEMBER ANTHONY P ICKETT. M Ef,,1.BER ANDR E GIRARD. MEMBER Sault St e. Marie, ON P6A 1 R3 May 1, 2019 Dan Hollingsworth Executive Directo r Sault St e. Marie Economic Deve lopmen t Corporat ion 99 Foster Olive Sault St e. Marie, ON P6A 5X6 RE: Foreign Trade Zone Point Des i gn at ion Dea r Dan Holl ingsworth : SAULT S TE. MARIE M ICH IGAN LINDA HOATH. V IC E CHAIR T HOt.lAS BUCKI NGHAM SR., MEMBER SCOTT SHACKLETON. M EMBER N ICHOLAS WHITE . ._1EMBER We are plea sed to endorse and su pport the Sau lt Ste . Marie Econom ic Deve lopment Corporatio n's appl ication th rough Fed Nor to see the City of Sa ult Ste. Marie des ignat ed as a Fore ign Trade Zon e Point. Such a designat ion wou ld assist Sault St e. Marie in it s efforts to promote the city f or investment attraction an d internati onal trade , as well as crea ting a one-window approach to he lp exist ing business take advan tage of the valua ble programs offered through the Fore ign Trade Zone program. The Sau lt Ste. Marie Br idge Int ernational Bridge is comm itted to is the safe and efficien t movemen t of people and goods across the Internati onal Bridge between Sault Ste . Marie, On talio and Sa ult Ste. Ma ne. Mich igan . The mission of the Internati onal Blidge is to promot e Canad ia11 and U.S. trade . tourism and regiona l eco11om ic deve lopment. The bridge heavily relies on these economic op portun iti es in orde r to protect the brid ge REPLY TO: PETER M . PETAINEN. GENERAL MANAGER 934 BR IDGE PI.A2A SAULT STE. MARI E, M ICHIGAN 49783 PHONE: (906) 635-5255 FAX: (906) 635-0640 TODITTY -M ICHI GAN RELAY CENTER (800) 64 9-3m 12 1 HURON S TREET SAULT STE. MARIE, ON PSA 1 R3 PHONE: (705) 942-4345 VfVfW.mlCl'llgan.gov/lDa - 185 - asset Wh ich must be ma intained and preserved in orde r to pro tect the unres tricted mobility of loca l, state and provincial residen ts . Please do not hesitat e to cont act me at 705 -942-4345 extension 137 or ema il petainenp@m ichiga n.gov . Since rely, Pete r M. Petainen Ge neral Ma nager Int ern ation al Blidge Ac.ministration - 186 - Memo To: Marisa Carpino April 21, 2021 Chief Administrative Officer From: Kyle Bentley Director, City Development & CBO Copy: City Clerk Chief Planner Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Planner II Subject: Planning & Development Committee Meeting of April 6, 2021 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2019-02 Draft Plan of Condominium Application CP 2019-03 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 13/19 10046043 Canada Inc. & C. Wang Lots 14, 29 and 30, Part of Lots 22 to 26 Plan 818, Part 4 of 40R-29018, Part 1 of 40R-29545, Part 2 of 40R-30489 and Part 1 of 40R-30492 (1950 and 1952 Fairport Road) This memo is related to Item 5.3 of the Planning & Development Committee Agenda of April 6, 2021. At this meeting, Recommendation Report PLN 17-21 for the above-noted applications was before Committee for consideration but was referred to Council at its meeting to be held on April 26th. During the Planning & Development Committee meeting, area residents and Committee Members asked a number of questions and requested additional clarification with the proposal. Subsequent to this meeting, staff received a letter from the representative of the Coalition Group through Councillor Brenner (see Attachment #1). In an effort to provide further clarification, staff have prepared two tables providing detailed responses to the questions raised by the residents (see Attachment #2) and Committee Members (see Attachment #3). Attachments #4 to #7 are referenced in the two detailed response tables. Staff are proposing changes to the Recommended Condition of Approval Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2019-03 to ensure specific requirements are secured and appropriately addressed by the applicant through the detailed review phase (see Appendix I to this Memorandum). The specific changes include: •submit a pre-condition survey for 1942 Fairport Road (see Conditions #16); •require the applicant to construct a sidewalk along the west side of Fairport Road, from the entrance of the private road to the intersection of Glenanna Road (see Condition #36); •identify the location and height of the privacy fences (see Conditions #38 and #39); CAO 25-21 - 187 - RRevised April 21, 2021 Page 2 of 2 •include restrictions on the lots abutting the valleyland to prevent future homeowners from removing and installing gates or other openings with the chainlink fence (see Condition #41); and •require replacement trees to have a minimum caliper size (see Condition #45). Should Council endorse the draft plan of subdivision and approve the implementing zoning by-law, the applicant will commence the preparation of the detailed technical drawings, for review by City staff, in order to satisfy the conditions of draft plan approval. During this review, staff will continue to work with the applicant and the residents to address any outstanding technical matters, including but not limited to, fencing details and locations, grading, drainage, and on-site tree planting. In consideration of concerns raised at the Committee meeting, staff recommend the two recommendations in PLN 17-21 be replaced with the following: 1.That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 13/19, submitted by 10046043 Canada Inc. and C. Wang, to facilitate a residential common element condominium development consisting of 27 detached dwellings and 3 lots for detached dwellings fronting Fairport Road, on lands located on the west side of Fairport Road, south of Taplin Drive, be approved as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN 17-21; and 2.That Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP-2019-03, submitted by 10046043 Canada Inc. and C. Wang, to establish 3 lots for detached dwellings fronting Fairport Road, a single development block to permit a residential common element condominium, an open space block, a road widening, and 2 blocks for future development, as shown on Attachment #4 to Report PLN 17-21, and the implementing revised conditions of approval, as set out in Appendix I to the Memorandum from the Director, City Development & CBO, dated April 21, 2021, be endorsed. Should any member of Council require further information, please contact Tanjot Bal at extension 2223 or Nilesh Surti at extension 2035. KB:NS:so j\documents\D-3200\2019\SP-2019-03 A13-19\MemotoCouncil\Memo Appendix I Revised Recommended Conditions of Approval for Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2019-03 Attachment #1 Correspondence received by the Coalition Group submitted to Councillor Brenner Attachment #2 Staff’s Response to Concerns raised by Residents and Coalition Group Attachment #3 Staff’s Response to Questions raised by Planning & Development Committee Attachment #4 Fencing Location Attachment #5 Revised Servicing Plan Attachment #6 Email from Brian Moss, dated April 6, 2021 Attachment #7 Photos of the Rear Yard of 829 Taplin Drive - 188 - Appendix I Revised Recommended Conditions of Approval for Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2019-03 General Conditions 1.That the Owner shall prepare the final plan generally on the basis of the approved draft plan of subdivision, prepared by Brian Moss & Associates Ltd., identified as Drawing Number 2821595 DP-2, revised and dated May 20, 2020, which illustrates 3 lots for detached dwellings, a condominium block for 27 single-detached dwellings, an open space block, a 3.0 metre wide road widening, and two blocks for future development. Region of Durham 2.That the Owner shall name road allowances included in this draft plan to the satisfaction of the Region of Durham and the City of Pickering. 3.That the Owner shall submit plans showing the proposed phasing to the Region of Durham and the City of Pickering for review and approval if this subdivision is to be developed by more than one registration. 4.That the Owner shall grant to the Region of Durham, any easements required to provide Regional Services for this development and these easements shall be in locations and of such widths as determined by the Region. 5.That prior to final approval, the Owner is required to submit a Record of Site Condition (RSC) to the Region of Durham, the City of Pickering, and the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP). This RSC must be to the satisfaction of the Region, including an Acknowledgement of Receipt of the RSC by the MECP. 6.That the Owner shall agree in the City of Pickering Subdivision Agreement to implement the recommendation of the report, entitled, “Environmental Noise Assessment,” prepared by YCA Engineering Ltd., dated May 2019, which specifies noise attenuation measures for the development. The measures shall be included in the Subdivision Agreement and must also contain a full and complete reference to the noise report (i.e. author, title, date and any revisions/agenda) and shall include warning clauses identified in the study. 7.That the Owner shall submit the report, entitled, “Stage 1 and 2 Archaeological Assessment of 1950 and 1952 Fairport Road,” prepared by This Land Archaeology Inc., June 25, 2018 to the Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries. No grading or other soil disturbance shall take place on the subject property prior to a letter of clearance from the Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries. 8.That the Owner shall provide for the extension of such sanitary sewer and water supply facilities which are external to, as well as within, the limits of this plan that are required to service this plan. In addition, the Owner shall provide for the extension of sanitary sewer and water supply facilities within the limits of the plan which are required to service other developments external to this subdivision. Such sanitary sewer and water supply facilities are to be designed and constructed according to the - 189 - Conditions of Draft Plan Approval SP-2019-03 April x, 2021 Page 2 standards and requirements of the Region of Durham. All arrangements, financial and otherwise, for said extensions are to be made to the satisfaction of the Region of Durham, and are to be completed prior to final approval of this plan. 9.That prior to entering into a Subdivision Agreement, the Region of Durham shall be satisfied that adequate water pollution control plant and water supply plant capacities are available to the proposed development. 10.That the Owner shall satisfy all requirements, financial and otherwise, of the Region of Durham. This shall include, among other matters, the execution of a Subdivision Agreement between the Owner and the Region concerning the provision and installation of sanitary sewers, water supply, roads and other Regional services. Subdivision Agreement 11.That the Owner enters into a subdivision agreement with and to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering to ensure the fulfillment of the City’s requirements, financial and otherwise, which shall include, but not necessarily be limited to the conditions outlined in this document. 40M-Plan 12.That the Owner submits a Draft 40M-Plan to the satisfaction of the City Development Department. Dedications/Transfers/Conveyances 13.That the Owner shall convey to the City, at no cost Block 5 (Open Space) and Block 8 (Road Widening). Street Names 14.That street names and signage be provided to the satisfaction of the Region of Durham and the City of Pickering. 15.That municipal addressing be assigned as per the City’s addressing By-law 7686/19. Pre-Condition Survey 16.That the Owner submits a pre-condition survey for 1942 Fairport Road and 1954 to 1960 Fairport Road to the satisfaction of the City. The surveys must be prepared by a qualified professional and must be undertaken prior to any site works commencing. Vibration monitoring to be conducted during site serving to ensure vibrations are within accepted limits. Development Charges & Development Review & Inspection Fee 17.That the Owner satisfies the City financially with respect to the Development Charges Act. - 190 - Conditions of Draft Plan Approval SP-2019-03 April x, 2021 Page 3 18.That the Owner satisfies the City with respect to payment for engineering review fees, residential lot grading review fee and development services inspection fees. Architectural Control 19.That the Owner submits preliminary model designs for sale to be reviewed and approved by the City’s Urban Design Review Consultant. The Owner will be responsible for the City’s full cost of undertaking this review. Stormwater 20.That the Owner satisfies the Director, Engineering Services, respecting the stormwater drainage and management system to service all the lands in the subdivision and any provision regarding easements. 21.That the Owner satisfies the Director, Engineering Services, for contributions for stormwater maintenance fees. 22.That the Owner satisfies the Director, Engineering Services for the design and implementation of stormwater management facilities and easements for outfall and access to the outfalls. Grading 23.That the Owner satisfies the Director, Engineering Services, respecting the submission and approval of a grading and drainage plan. 24.That the Owner satisfies the Director, Engineering Services, respecting the authorization from abutting land owners for all off-site grading. Geotechnical Investigation 25.That the Owner satisfies the Director, Engineering Services, respecting the submission and approval of a geotechnical soils analysis. Fill & Topsoil 26.That the Owner acknowledges that the City’s Fill & Topsoil Disturbance By-law prohibits vegetation or soil disturbance, vegetation or soil removal or importation to the site. No on-site works prior to the City issuing authorization to commence works is permitted. A Fill & Topsoil Permit will be required should grading works proceed prior to the execution of a Subdivision Agreement. Construction/Installation of City Works & Services 27.That the Owner satisfies the Director, Engineering Services, respecting the construction of roads with curbs, storm sewers, sidewalks and boulevard designs. - 191 - Conditions of Draft Plan Approval SP-2019-03 April x, 2021 Page 4 28.That the Owner satisfy the City respecting arrangements for the provision of all services required by the City. 29.That the Owner satisfies the appropriate authorities respecting arrangements for the provision of underground wiring, street lighting, cable television, natural gas and other similar services. 30.That the Owner agrees that the cost of any relocation, extension, alteration or extraordinary maintenance of existing services necessitated by this development shall be the responsibility of the Owner. Easements 31.That the Owner conveys, to the satisfaction of the City, at no cost, any required easement for works, facilities or user rights that are required by the City. 32.That the Owner conveys any easements to any utility provider to facilitate the installation of their services in a location(s) to the satisfaction of the City and the utility provider. 33.That the Owner arrange, at no cost to the City, any easements required on third party lands for servicing and such easements shall be in a location as determined by the City and/or the Region and are to be granted upon request any time after draft approval. 34.That the Owner submits a Draft 40R-Plan indicating the easements required for the maintenance of Block 5 (Open Space) to the satisfaction of the City. Construction Management Plan 35.That the Owner satisfies the City respecting the submission and approval of a Construction Management/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan, with such Plan to contain, among other matters: (i)details of erosion and sedimentation controls during all phases of construction and provide maintenance requirements for these controls; (ii)addressing the parking of vehicles and the storage of construction and building materials during servicing and construction, and ensuring that such locations will not impede the flow of traffic or emergency vehicles on existing streets, or the proposed public street; (iii) insurance that the City’s Noise By-law will be adhered to and that all contractors, trades and suppliers are advised of this By-law; (iv)the provision of mud and dust control on all roads within and adjacent to the site; (v)type and timing of construction fencing; - 192 - Conditions of Draft Plan Approval SP-2019-03 April x, 2021 Page 5 (vi)location of construction trailers; and (vii)details of the temporary construction access. Sidewalk 36.That the Owner agrees to construct a 1.5 metre wide concrete on the west side of Fairport Road from the entrance of the site to the intersection of Glenanna Road, to the satisfaction of the Director, Engineering Services. Fencing 37.That the Owner satisfies the City with respect to the provision of temporary fencing around the entire perimeter of the subject lands during construction, prior to the commencement of any works. 38.That the owner agrees to install a 1.8 metre high board-on-board wood privacy fence along all adjacent rear lot lines that abut residential lots in the development. 39.That the Owner agrees to install a 2.0 metre high board-on-board wood privacy fence along the south property line where there is an adjacent existing residential lot fronting onto Fairport Road, to the satisfaction of the Director, Engineering Services. 40.That the Owner agrees to install a 1.8 metre high black vinyl chain link fence along the boundary of the development lots and Open Space Buffer Block 5, to the satisfaction of the Director, Engineering Services. 41.The Owner shall agree to include a “Warning” in the Purchase and Sales Agreement and Condominium Declaration that the owner(s) of POTLs shall have a restrictive covenant placed over POTLs 6 to 20, as identified on the Draft Plan of Condominium, prepared by Brian Moss + Associates Ltd., identified as Drawing Number 2821595- CEC-2, dated November 2018. The restrictive covenant shall have the effect of prohibiting: 1) the removal of the fences and 2) the installation of gates or other access through the fences. Landscaping 42.That the Owner submit a tree planting plan, including the location of boulevard trees, to the satisfaction of the City. Tree Compensation 43.That the Owner agrees that prior to final approval of the draft plan, compensation for the loss of tree canopy will be required either through replacement planting or cash-in-lieu, to be paid to the City of Pickering. In accordance with Council Resolution #387/18, approved on January 15, 2018, tree removal compensation is to be calculated in accordance with the City of Pickering Tree Inventory, Preservation and Removal - 193 - Conditions of Draft Plan Approval SP-2019-03 April x, 2021 Page 6 Compensation requirements. Where compensation through replanting is being considered, the Owner will be required to provide a Landscape Plan indicating the location, size and species of all trees, to the satisfaction of the Director, Engineering Services. 44.That the Owner agrees that prior to final approval of the draft plan, 100 trees be replanted as compensation for the 20 trees removed from within the City of Pickering’s Tree Protection Area (By-law 6108/03) within the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority’s screening area or in an area approved by the City. 45.That the Owner agrees that the replacement planting will be to the City’s minimum standards for replacement trees: 60 millimetre caliper deciduous trees and 1.8 metre high for coniferous trees. Engineering Plans 46.That the Owner ensures that the engineering plans are coordinated with the streetscape/architectural drawings and further that the engineering plans coordinate the location of driveways, street hardware and street trees to ensure that conflicts do not exist and that asphalt is minimized and all objectives of the streetscape/architectural control guidelines can be achieved. 47.That the Owner satisfies the City respecting the submission of appropriate engineering drawings that detail, among other things: City services, roads, storm sewers, sidewalks, tree planting; and financially-secure such works. 48.That the Owner ensures the engineering plans are coordinated with the architectural design objectives. Noise Attenuation 49.That the Owner shall agree in the subdivision agreement to implement the recommended noise control measures and warning clauses of the study entitled, “Environmental Noise Assessment,” prepared by YCA Engineering Limited, as dated May 2019. Parkland Dedication 50.That the Owner satisfies the City with respect to the payment of cash-in-lieu in accordance with the parkland dedication requirements of the Planning Act. Model Homes 51.That the Owner enters into a model home agreement with the City, if applicable for this draft plan. All model homes must satisfy all architectural requirements. - 194 - Conditions of Draft Plan Approval SP-2019-03 April x, 2021 Page 7 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 52.Prior to the initiation of grading, and prior to the registration of this Draft Plan of Subdivision or any phase thereof, the owner shall submit the following to The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the City of Pickering for review and approval: a.A detailed Stormwater Management Report to include a detailed design for the storm drainage system for the proposed development including: i.plans illustrating how this drainage system will tie into surrounding drainage systems and stormwater management techniques which may be required to control minor or major flows; ii.appropriate Low Impact Development stormwater management practice to be used to treat stormwater, to mitigate the impacts of development on the quality and quantity of ground and surface water resources as it relates to terrestrial and aquatic habitat; iii.detailed design and maintenance plans for any stormwater management facilities; iv.an Erosion and Sediment Control Report and Plan, consistent with the Erosion and Sediment Control Guideline for Urban Construction (Greater Golden Horseshoe Area Conservation Authorities, 2006), as amended; v.location and description of all outlets and other facilities which may require a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended. b.Overall grading plans for the lands within the Draft Plan of Subdivision illustrating, among others, how all vegetation in the natural heritage system will be protected from grading and construction impacts. c.Landscaping plans for Open Space Buffer Block 5. 53.That the owner agrees in the subdivision agreement, in wording acceptable to the TRCA: a.To carry out, or cause to be carried out, to the satisfaction of the TRCA, the recommendations of the technical reports referenced in Condition No. 1; b.To agree to, and implement, the requirements of the TRCA's conditions in wording acceptable to the TRCA; c.To design and implement on and off-site erosion and sediment control; d.To maintain all stormwater management and erosion and sedimentation control structures operating and in good repair during the construction period, in a manner satisfactory to the TRCA; e.To obtain all necessary permits pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, from the TRCA; f.To implement all water balance/infiltration measures identified in the approved SWM Report. - 195 - Conditions of Draft Plan Approval SP-2019-03 April x, 2021 Page 8 g.To provide a letter of credit to the City of Pickering for the full cost of the landscaping identified in Condition No. 1(c). h.To install a chain link fence along the boundary of the development lots and Open Space Buffer Block 5. Canada Post 54.That the Owner agrees to include in all offers of purchase and sale, a statement that advises the prospective purchaser that mail delivery will be from a designated Community Mailbox. 55.The Owner will be responsible for notifying the purchaser of the exact Community Mailbox locations prior to the closing of any unit sale. 56.That the Owner agrees to consult with Canada Post Corporation to determine suitable location for the placement of Community Mailbox and to indicate these locations on appropriate servicing plans. 57.The Owner will provide the following for each Community Mailbox site and include these requirements on the appropriate servicing plans: •An appropriately sized sidewalk section (concrete pad) to place the Community Mailboxes on. •Any required walkway across the boulevard. •Any required curb depressions for wheelchair access. 58.The Owner further agrees to determine and provide a suitable temporary Community Mailbox location(s), which may be utilized by Canada Post until the curbs, sidewalks and final grading have been completed at the permanent Community Mailbox locations. This will enable Canada Post to provide mail delivery to the new homes as soon as they are occupied. 59.The Owner further agrees to provide Canada Post at least 60 days’ notice prior to the confirmed first occupancy date to allow for the community mailboxes to be ordered and installed at the prepared temporary location Other Approval Agencies 60.That any approvals which are required from the Region of Durham, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority or any utility for the development of this plan be obtained by the Owner and upon request written confirmation be provided to the City as verification of these approvals. 61.That the Owner, through the approval of the Utility Coordination Plan, is to enter into an agreement with Canada Post Corporation for the provision of a Community Mailbox(es) including technical specifications and financial terms. - 196 - Conditions of Draft Plan Approval SP-2019-03 April x, 2021 Page 9 Plan Revisions 62.That the Owner acknowledges and agrees that the draft plan of subdivision and associated conditions of approval may require revisions to the satisfaction of the City, to implement or integrate any recommendation resulting from studies required as conditions of approval. 63.That the Owner revises the draft plan as necessary to the satisfaction of the City, to accommodate any technical engineering issues which arise during the review of the final engineering drawings. Required revisions may include revising the number of residential building lots or reconfiguring the roads or lots to the City’s satisfaction. 64.That the Owner agrees to implement the requirements of all studies that are required by the City for the development of this draft plan of subdivision to the satisfaction of the City. - 197 - Attachment 1 Dear Councillor Brenner, The list below represents the most important issues identified by the Neighborhood Coalition concerning the proposed development at 1950/1952 Fairport Rd. Many of these issues are interrelated and resolving these concerns will in turn resolve many more. As residents we love the spacious treed feel of our neighborhood and are very protective of the Dunbarton Creek corridor and the associated wildlife. This is what we are asking Council to help us preserve. 1)Density relative to surrounding neighborhood. The Coalition would have (and still would) welcome an enclave like that developed on Voyager/Helm St. That development reflects the nature of homes immediately surrounding (abutting) it. The proposed development simply aims to maximize density. (Existing and Proposed Zoning Standards Table - attachment 7 of the Recommendation Report) Reducing density while increasing the square footage of the homes is the only way to meet the spirit of the official plan which calls on developers to protect and enhance the established neighborhood. It also mitigates some flooding risks by having more green space, provides more outdoor space for future residents and their families, improves serviceability of the neighborhood, improves parking and reduces traffic while not having a significant impact on the profitability of the project. 2)Environmental Protection - Contaminated soil. a.Parts of the applicant’s property have been identified as containing carcinogenic materials in the soil (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons – PAH’s). These locations are mapped out on the Terrapex Phase 2 ESA based on sampling between July 2107 and January 2019. (See Attachment 1) b.The majority of the contaminated fill is in the ‘buffer zone’ at a depth of up to 3 meters. This is the land that will be conveyed to the City. c.The City was made aware of bulldozer activity on June 4 of 2020. This soil relocation activity involved large portions of the property including edge of bank on the west side of the property and up to the north-western corner as is evidenced by the disappearance of much of the ‘drainage feature’. (see Attachment 2) The Phase 2 ESA is 2 years old and soil work (bulldozing) occurred after the Phase 2 ESA. d.Mr. Moss has only addressed limited remediation outside of the buffer zone. Mr. Moss and the City Planners at the April 7th Committee meeting only discussed remediation of the benign contaminants (construction debris) on the development site itself. - 198 - 3)Protection of the environmentally sensitive buffer zone. a.The Beacon Environmental Impact Study (7.1) states that the natural area must be protected from people and companion animals. b.The recommendation Report (Section 37 “Fencing” and section 48 TRCA part H) stipulate that a 1.8 metre fence be erected to protect the buffer zone from incursion. c.Section 37 also says that the owner will construct a ‘board on board’ privacy fence where new yards abut existing yards. The remainder of the fence is to be chain-link. We suggest a continuous privacy fence along the buffer to provide privacy to all yards and neighbors as well as to mitigate sound and light pollution. This will be beneficial to established and new residents as well as protect the wildlife corridor in the buffer zone. Mr. Moss stated at the April 7 th Committee meeting that this would not be done as it would require the removal of trees. Mr. Moss appears to be unaware that the fence line defining the buffer zone is 10 meters from the drip line. (see Attachment 2) d.We are concerned that the small amount of outdoor space provided for families in this proposed development will create significant motivation to violate the integrity of the fence. There are numerous examples in Pickering where owners install gates in such fences allowing them to use protected areas as part of their yard. The TRCA in its December 5th 2019 letter to Planning suggested a restrictive covenant or other legal mechanism to ensure the integrity of the fence thereby protecting the buffer zone. What enforceable mechanism will the City require? - 199 - Attachment 1 (Red is bad - PAH levels up to 100X Ontario limits, Green is OK) - 200 - Attachment 2 (Green dashed line is the ‘drip line’ and defines the ‘buffer zone’, blue dashed line is the ‘drainage feature’) - 201 - Staff’s Response to Concerns Raised by Residents and Coalition Group on April 6, 2021 # Issues Identified by Residents Response 1 Commented that the revised proposal is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) and A Places to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan) City staff have reviewed the proposal against the PPS and the Growth Plan (see PLN 17-21, sections 3.1). The PPS provides overall policy directions on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development, while protecting resources of provincial interest, public health and safety, and the quality of the natural and built environment. The PPS further states that Municipal official plans are the most important vehicle for implementation of the PPS and for achieving comprehensive, integrated and long-term planning. Official plans shall identify provincial interests and set out appropriate land use designations and policies. Various amendments have been made to the City’s Official Plan to ensure it is consistent with the PPS. Both the PPS and the Growth Plan calls for intensification within settlement areas, and the maintenance, restoration or where possible, improved linkages between natural heritage features and hydrological features. The proposed development promotes modest residential development that is consistent with density and environmental policies of the Official Plan. The proposal also ensures the long- term protection of the Dunbarton Creek and the associated valleylands. It is staff’s professional planning opinion that the proposal is consistent with the PPS and conforms to the Growth Plan, and represents an orderly development that is compatible and complements the established residential development within the immediately surrounding area. Attachment 2 - 202 - # Issues Identified by Residents Response Similarly, planning staff from the Region of Durham conclude that the proposal is consistent with the PPS and the Growth Plan (see PLN 17-21, section 2.2.1). 2 Commented that the revised proposal is not consistent with the Durham Region Official Plan and City of Pickering Official Plan City staff have reviewed the proposal against Regional and City policies (see PLN 17-21, sections 2.21, 3.2 and 3.3). The Regional Official Plan designates the subject lands as “Living Areas”, which shall be developed in a compact urban form through higher densities and by intensifying and redeveloping existing areas. The proposal conforms to the Durham Regional Official Plan confirmed by Regional Planning staff in their comments. The Pickering Official Plan designates the developable portion of the subject lands as “Urban Residential Areas – Low Density Areas” (Lots 1, 2 and 3, and Blocks 4 and 6) within the Dunbarton Neighbourhood. The proposed development will result in a residential density of approximately 18 units per net hectare, which falls within the permitted density range. The portion of the subject lands containing the Dunbarton Creek and associated valley lands and buffers are designated as “Open Space System – Natural Areas”. An Environmental Impact Study was completed by the applicants to determine the minimum required vegetation protection zones, and determine the site’s development limits, to prevent potential negative impacts from the proposed development on the natural heritage features. The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority has reviewed the EIS and agrees with the limits of Dunbarton Creek, the associated hazard lands, and associated buffers. - 203 - # Issues Identified by Residents Response 3 Commented that the revised proposal is not consistent with the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Guidelines. The Dunbarton Neighbourhood Guidelines state that lots along Fairport Road, north of Dunbarton Creek, can only be developed for detached dwellings with minimum lot frontages of 13.5 metres. For development proposed on new internal roads, the guidelines state that only detached dwellings are permitted on lots with a minimum frontage of 12.0 metres and with consistent building setbacks with recent subdivision standards (front yard minimums of 4.5 metres and side yard minimums of 0.6/1.2 metres). The Guidelines also encourage new roads to connect with existing streets to minimize dead ends. The proposed zoning standards have been reviewed against the existing zoning provisions and the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines, and staff are of the planning opinion that the proposal is consistent with the minimum recommended built form provisions of the Development Guidelines. 4 Commented that the proposed common element condominium development is not consistent with the neighbourhood as there are no condominium developments in the area. Supportive of a subdivision, similar to Voyager Avenue and Helm Street/Grayabbey Court. This reduces the density, increases the square footage of the homes, to meet the spirit of the Official Plan, which calls on developers to protect and enhance the established neighbourhood. It also mitigates some flooding risks by having more green space, provides more outdoor space for future residents and their families, improves serviceability of the neighbourhood, improves parking and reduces traffic while not having a significant impact on the profitability of the project. Staff have thoroughly reviewed the existing neighbourhood character along Taplin Drive, Fairport Road and other subdivisions in close proximity to the subject lands to ensure the proposal will “fit in” and complement the existing pattern of development. In addition, staff have also ensured the proposal complies with the City’s Official Plan and neighbourhood policies and the Dunbarton Development Guidelines. Pickering’s Official Plan permits a maximum density of up to and including 30 units per net hectare. The proposed development will result in a density of approximately 18 units per net hectare. - 204 - # Issues Identified by Residents Response The existing density along the east side of Fairport Road between Taplin Drive and Glenanna Road is greater than this proposal, at approximately 20.2 units per hectare. The existing density along Voyager Avenue is approximately 20 units per hectare, and the existing density of the Marshall Homes development, located on the east side of Fairport Road, generally opposite Wingarden Crescent, is 19.8 units per net hectare. The proposed density conforms to the density requirements of the Official Plan and is consistent with the density of surrounding development. The immediate neighbourhood has a range of lotting fabric and built form. The 10 lots along the south side of Taplin Drive have unusually deep lot depths (approximately 100 metres) compared to the lots along the north side of Taplin Drive and the rest of the neighbourhood. These lots have lot frontages ranging between 15 metres and 41 metres and minimum side yard setbacks of 1.2 metres. Staff are of the opinion that these lots are not a fair representation of the character of the Dunbarton Neighbourhood. The lots along the west side of Fairport Road, north of the proposed development, range in lot area between 456 square metres to 1,490 square metres, range in lot frontage between 14.3 metres to 25.8 metres, and have minimum side yard setbacks of 1.2 metres. The lots along the east side of Fairport Road between Taplin Drive and Glennana Road have a minimum lot area of 350 square metres, minimum lot frontage of 12 metres and minimum side yard setbacks of 1.2 metres one side and 0.6 of a metre the other side. Staff recognize that the proposed common element condominium is situated within an established neighbourhood where all lots front a public street, with the - 205 - # Issues Identified by Residents Response exception of the Marshall Homes development noted above. However, the proposed common element will not be visible from Fairport Road, therefore it will not impact the character of the existing streetscape along Fairport Road. The proposed lots sizes, lot frontages and building setbacks are comparable with other recent developments within the neighbourhood. 5 Concerned that matters related to flooding and loss of wetland have not been adequately addressed The applicants completed an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) in 2019 to identify the natural heritage features and functions on or adjacent to the subject property, assess impacts of the proposed development, and recommend mitigation measures to ensure that the significant natural features are not adversely affected. The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) regulates land use activity in and adjacent to wetlands, watercourses and valleylands. TRCA and the EIS identify a watercourse and associated valleylands on the subject property. No wetland has been identified by TRCA, the EIS or by the Province. Proposed Lots 20 to 25 back onto the residential lots along the south side of Taplin Drive. Within the rear yards of these lots, there will be a swale that will capture the existing drainage from the Taplin Drive properties. This swale will direct the drainage to the storm sewer and then to the Creek. The existing drainage pattern for Fairport Road will be maintained. This development will result in no flood or drainage impacts to the existing lots along Fairport Road and Taplin Drive. - 206 - # Issues Identified by Residents Response 6 A development at this size will lead to issues with contaminated soil by moving existing contaminated soil around. In addition, the Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) does not take into consideration the site changes that occurred in June 2020 when soil was relocated at the property. The applicant has submitted a Phase 1 and Phase 2 ESA as part of this proposal. Phase 1 ESA identified 6 potential environmental concerns, and therefore, as per Provincial regulations, a Phase 2 ESA was conducted. The objective of the Phase 2 ESA was to investigate the areas of potential environmental concerns through bore hole tests and ground water samples. The study found concentrations of potential environmental concerns that exceeded safe levels in the fill and native soils on the western portion of the site (i.e. the Open Space Block). All other samples tested were below levels of concern as per Ministry guidelines, including groundwater and surface water samples. As a condition of draft approval, the applicant is required to submit a Record of Site Condition (RSC) to the Region of Durham, the City of Pickering and the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (see Condition #5, Revised Recommended Conditions of Draft Approval of Subdivision, Appendix I to Memorandum). A RSC can only be filed once the site is remediated (i.e., the contaminated soil within the Open Space Block is safely removed from the site and replaced with healthy soil). The City will require the RSC prior to the transfer of the Open Space Block to the City. - 207 - # Issues Identified by Residents Response 7 Commented that the proposed trees to be planted are insufficient in size to replace mature trees that were removed by the previous owner. Historically, a number of trees were removed from 1952 Fairport Road by the previous owner. 20 of these trees were within the City’s Tree Protection By-law area. A replant order was issued against the previous owner, to plant 100 trees for the 20 trees removed without a permit. This replant order is not attached to the property. However, the new landowners have agreed to replant 100 trees in a location approved by the City and TRCA. As a conditions of draft plan approval, the City requires 100 trees to be planted within the buffer zone, and the City’s minimum standards for replacement tree planting of 60 millimetre caliper deciduous trees and 1.8-metre high for coniferous trees be met (see Conditions #43 to #45, Revised Recommended Conditions of Draft Approval of Subdivision, Appendix I to Memorandum). Through the detailed design stage, the applicants will be required to submit a tree preservation and replanting plan, which will be reviewed against the City’s standards. Also, since the replanting is to take place within the buffer zone, TRCA will also review the replanting against their standards. 16 Requested that the buffer area restrict access to residents Both the City’s and TRCA’s standard requirement is for a 1.8-metre high vinyl chain link fence where rear yards about a natural heritage features. A fence will be required between the residential development block and the eastern boundary of the buffer. This will restrict residential access to the valleylands and associated buffer lands. Although the requirement for fencing was included in the conservation authority’s conditions, this requirement is now explicitly integrated into the draft plan of subdivision conditions (see Condition #40, Revised Recommended - 208 - # Issues Identified by Residents Response Conditions of Draft Approval of Subdivision, Appendix I to Memorandum). Additionally, the City has included an new condition requiring the Owner to include a “Warning” clause in the Purchase and Sales Agreement and the future Condominium Declaration that a restrictive covenant be placed over POTLs 6 to 20, having the effect of prohibiting: 1) the removal of the fences; and 2) the installation of gates or other access through the fences (see Condition #41, Revised Recommended Conditions of Draft Approval of Subdivision, Appendix I to the Memorandum). 8 Requested that the owner continue the board on board fence for the entire length of the property to provide privacy and as a visual barrier for wildlife using the buffer lands Both the City’s and TRCA’s standard requirement is for a 1.8-metre high vinyl chain link fence where rear yards about a natural heritage features. This is consistent with existing lots immediately to the north and south of the subject lands as well as many other developments within the City. The purpose of the chain link fence is to allow residents of those properties to back onto a natural heritage feature to enjoy the view of the Dunbarton Creek and associated valleylands. 9 Requested clarification regarding what restrictions will be included to ensure the maintenance of the fence along the Dunbarton Creek and to prohibit installation of a gate to access the open space lands The City has included an additional condition requiring the Owner to include a “Warning” clause in the Purchase and Sales Agreement and the future Condominium Declaration that a restrictive covenant be placed over POTLs 6 to 20, having the effect of prohibiting: 1) the removal of the fences; and 2) the installation of gates or other access through the fences (see Condition #41, Revised Recommended Conditions of Draft Approval of Subdivision, Appendix I to the Memorandum). Staff will ensure the fence is included as the common element so - 209 - # Issues Identified by Residents Response that it must be maintained by the future condominium corporation. 10 Surface soil was relocated in the summer of 2020, including soil within the buffer zone and Mrs. Freund’s property (829 Taplin Drive). The City believes soil was only brought in for construction of the driveway, which is inaccurate. Concerned the bulldozing has deposited contaminated soil on Mrs. Freund’s property Would like to be considered in any site remediation. The applicant’s planning consultant, Brian Moss, personally attended the site on July 29, 2020, the day that staff called Mr. Moss about the activity on site. A very limited amount of fill was brought into the site to smooth out the front lawn area of 1952 Fairport. Also, some granular was provided on the driveway. There was no soil movement to the north end of the property. It occurred in the central portion of the property, and was quite limited in scope. In addition, City staff from the Engineering Department conducted a site visit on July 29, 2020 and confirmed no fill permit was required as the amount of soil brought onto the site was under the fill permit requirement. This appeared to be normal fill and no fill was placed onto any of the neighbouring properties, including 829 Taplin Drive (see photos of south limit of 829 Taplin Drive, Attachment #7 to Memorandum ) for showing no disturbance at or near the fence line). 11 Commented that any works completed within the buffer zone should not coincide with denning season (fox’s and coyote’s in the area). The applicants have advised that they will avoid works relative to the valley area during denning season, which is generally in the month of April 12 Concerned that the submitted Functional Site Servicing Report (FSSR) does not reflect revisions discussed between the applicants and Mr. Arndt, including reduction of retaining walls, and location of storm water pipe from 1966 Fairport Road to 1954 Fairport Road that drains into 1952 Fairport Road. The revised FSSR (dated December 2020) identifies the stormwater drainage pipe running diagonally from the area of 1966 Fairport Road to 1954 Fairport road (see Functional Servicing Plan, dated December 14, 2020, Attachment # 5 to Memorandum). Drainage for this pipe will enter an inlet pipe connecting to the foundation drain - 210 - # Issues Identified by Residents Response collector (FDC) pipe in the condominium development. Additionally, a grate in the retaining wall will provide for surface drainage to the FDC pipe. There will be no catch basin on Mr. Arndt’s property and thus no need for an easement Attachment #5 also shows the proposed location of retaining was adjacent to 1954 Fairport. The length of the required retaining wall has been reduced. The Consulting Engineer will coordinate all other issues with the owner of 1954 Fairport Road at detailed design stage. 13 Requested fencing along 1942 Fairport Road north property line to be increased to 2 metres in height The applicants have agreed to install a 2-metre high wood privacy fence along the south property line, between the proposed development and 1942 Fairport Road (see Condition #39, Revised Recommended Conditions of Draft Approval of Subdivision, Appendix I to Memorandum). 14 Requested a no parking zone in close proximity to the intersection of Glennana Road and Fairport Road The City will install no parking signs along the west side of Fairport Road from 1952 Fairport Road south to the intersection of Glennana Road and Fairport Road. The City’s Traffic By-law will need to be updated to reflect this change. The applicant has no objections. 15 Commented that water pressure on the street has decreased over time and are concerned that this development will further decrease the water pressure The Water pressure in this area (Zone 2) is between 657 kPa and 667 kPa, which exceeds the amount required (550 kPa for a pressure reducing valve). Residents should contact the Region of Durham Works Department to have a pressure test done if they are concerned about their individual water pressure. - 211 - Staff’s Response to Questions Raised Planning & Development Committee on April 6, 2021 # Issues identified by Planning & Development Committee Response 1 Requested additional information regarding a comparison with the condominium development at 1815 Fairport Road (parking, number of units, density, zoning standards) The proposed condominium development at 1950 and 1952 Fairport Road has similar development standards to the existing Marshal Homes condominium development at 1815 Fairport Road. The Marshall Homes development is 1.59 hectares in size and has 31 lots with detached dwellings (which is a density of 19.5 units per net hectare). For the proposal at 1950 and 1952 Fairport Road, Block 4, which is the condominium block, is 1.53 hectares in size and proposes 27 lots for detached dwellings (which is a density of 17.6 units per net hectare). Both the Marshall Homes development and the proposal at 1950 and 1952 Fairport Road have minimum lot areas of 350 square metres and minimum lot frontages of 12 metres. The Marshall Homes development provides 10 visitor parking spaces (0.3 visitor parking spaces per unit) and the proposal provides 12 visitor parking spaces (0.44 visitor parking spaces per unit). The two developments also have similar setbacks, including 4.5 metre front yard setback, 1.2 metres and 0.6 of a metre side yard setbacks, 7.5 metre rear yard setbacks, and minimum flankage side yard of 3.0 metres. In addition, the proposed lot coverage and maximum building height are aligned. Attachment 3 - 212 - # Issues identified by Planning & Development Committee Response The proposed condominium development at 1950 and 1952 Fairport Road will result in a development similar to the condominium development located at 1815 Fairport Road. 2 Requested clarification if there or has there ever been a wetland or marsh present at 1952 Fairport Road? Does the conservation authority have any concerns with the wetland? TRCA reviewed some historical imagery available and it appears as though 1952 Fairport Road was cleared and the dwelling was built over 35 years ago. The historical air photo from 1981 shows a wetland may have been present. However, the feature is no longer present in imagery from 1988. TRCA has advised that they have no concerns with the possible historical wetland on the site. TRCA mapping does not show a wetland being present on this site and no wetland was observed during the site visit conducted on November 18, 2019. In addition, the EIS did not identify a wetland on the site. 3 Requested what is the proposed use of the 3-metre wide parcel fronting Taplin? The applicant has advised that their intention is to convey the 3-metre wide parcel from the subject site to Taplin Drive to the adjacent owners at no cost, including all legal costs. However, the applicant cannot warrant whether these owners have an interest in acquiring the parcel of land. - 213 - # Issues identified by Planning & Development Committee Response 4 Requested who will own the “triangle shaped” open space lands on the west side of the Dunbarton Creek? The entirety of Block 5, open space lands, will be transferred to the City of Pickering for long term protection. As other lands adjacent to Dunbarton Creek have been redeveloped, the portion of the lands containing the Creek and associated valleylands have been transferred to the City. For this reason, the City is requesting that the environmental lands (Block 5) be conveyed to the City to ensure consistent ownership of all environmental lands. 5 Requested confirmation on the number of trees to be replanted and the size of such trees to compensate for the mature trees which were historically removed from the site? As a conditions of draft plan approval, the City requires 100 trees to be planted within the buffer zone, and the City’s minimum standards for replacement tree planting of 60 millimetre caliper deciduous trees and 1.8-metre high for coniferous trees be met (see Conditions #43 to #45, Revised Recommended Conditions of Draft Approval of Subdivision, Appendix I to Memorandum). 6 Requested staff investigate possible future upgrades to Bonita Park There are no immediate plans or budget to do any work within Bonita Park. However, if the community is requesting the City to consider upgrades to this park, staff can look into what opportunities there are for any upgrades and possibly engage the area residents before determining the final cost and including it in a future budget. A formal directive from Council is required to commence this review. - 214 - # Issues identified by Planning & Development Committee Response 7 Requested clarification regarding the extension of municipal sidewalk along the west side of Fairport Road, south to the intersection of Glennana and Fairport. As a condition of draft plan approval, the applicants will be required to construct a sidewalk in front of 1950 and 1952 Fairport Road, connecting to the proposed sidewalk along the private road (see Condition #36, Revised Recommended Conditions of Draft Approval of Subdivision, Appendix I to Memorandum). This will allow pedestrians to safely cross at the intersection of Glennana Road and Fairport Road. The City will paint pedestrian cross hatching at this 3-way stop. - 215 - Attachment 4Attachment 4- 216 - C / L C R E E K E S T IM A T E ON L Y C / L C R E E K 12345 25 27 6 7 14 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 8 22 23 24 26 FAIRPORT ROADGLENANNA ROAD ³ 'A''A' 'B' 'B' ³ CANDEVCON LIMITED KEY PLAN KEY PLAN E17043 1950 & 1952 FAIRPORT RD SERVICING PLAN FUNCTIONAL FSP SITE NOTES: LEGEND Attachment 5 - 217 - Attachment 6 Bal, Tanjot From: Brian Moss <bmoss@sympatico.ca> Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 12:01 PM To: brianfe Cc: Bal, Tanjot; Surti, Nilesh; Rose, Catherine Subject: SP-2019-02, CP-2019-04, A 13/19 - Second Submission Brian, I have read your requests of Committee (for April 6, 2021) relative to the adjacent proposal and I would comment as follows; 1. 2m fence is fine with applicant, condition requires 1.8m 2. Pre-condition survey of your home is acceptable 3. Covers structure (wall cracks and so on), the fence line and legal lot line are somewhat out of alignment on the boundary, the final fence line would be on the legal property line and avoid any key trees (by having short break). 4. The pre-condition survey will be made available to you 5. Water pressure (regional water department issue) 6. Once the internal road is constructed and available for travel, we would support all trades parking on site (rather than using Fairport Road) 7. The bylaw wording is standard. TRCA and the City likely do not see a walking trail along Dunbarton Creek in this area. Your amendment is fine with the applicant if so desired. We look forward to working with you on tree preservation and fencing once we are at that stage. If you wish to speak, I am available this afternoon. Brian Moss Principal BRIAN MOSS AND ASSOCIATES LTD. (905) 427-1725 office (preferred) (416) 801-2272 cell www.bmaplan.com 1 - 218 - Bal, Tanjot From: Brian Moss <bmoss@sympatico.ca> Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 12:18 PM To: kparenovations Cc: Bal, Tanjot; Surti, Nilesh; Rose, Catherine; Helgesen, Paal; Nick Henley Subject: 1954 Fairport Road .. relative to 1952 Fairport Road .. Peter, You have made us aware of various servicing and grading related matters relative to your property. We have made commitments to you that when we move to detailed engineering design that all the issues you have mentioned will be dealt with at that stage. In summary, you concerns include; - ensuring positive grade and drainage for your property - ensuring that a catch basin between your home and garage will be serviceable downstream - ensuring that a storm drainage pipe upstream of your property (and 1952 property) is dealt with, with best engineering solutions The Functional Servicing Report and related drawings try to capture these aspects, but the detailed design will deal with all issues. We are committed to discussing those solutions with you. Brian Moss Principal BRIAN MOSS AND ASSOCIATES LTD. (905) 427-1725 office (416) 801-2272 cell www.bmaplan.com 1 - 219 - Attachment 7 Photos of the Rear Yard of 829 Taplin Drive (near 1952 Fairport Road, no common boundary) 829 Taplin Road (rear lot line, looking west) (angled fence at west end of property follows Dunbarton Creek) no soil disturbance on either side of fence line 829 Taplin Road (rear lot line, looking east) .. no soil disturbance on either side of fence line - 220 - Report to Council Report Number: CS 20-21 Date: April 26, 2021 From: Brian Duffield (Acting) Director, Community Services Subject: Request for Additional Funding for Consulting Services - CHDRC Generator Replacement - File: A-1440 Recommendation: 1. That the additional fee proposal and project costs as submitted by TS Engineering Inc. in the gross amount of $84,750.00 (HST included), and the net amount of $76,320.00 (net HST rebate) for the increase in scope of work the replacement of the backup power generator at the Chestnut Hill Developments Recreation Complex (CHDRC), and associated costs, be accepted; 2. That the total estimated consulting costs including the amount referenced in recommendation 1 above, in the amount of $124,819.00, as presented in Table 2, be approved; 3. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to finance the total net consulting costs of $124,819.00 by undertaking an internal loan for period not exceeding 5 years, and this source be revised up to 100 per cent funding through a transfer from the Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund if deemed eligible by the Association Municipalities of Ontario; and, 4. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect hereto. Executive Summary: TS Engineering Inc. was retained by the City in December 2020 under PO 700753 to develop design and construction documents for replacement of the existing backup power generator at the Chestnut Hill Developments Recreation Complex (CHDRC). The existing generator was installed in 2002 and has reached the end of its serviceable life. Backup power is essential for sustained operation of the building, including maintaining life safety systems, critical lighting, preserving ice in arenas and for the HVAC systems. It has been determined that greater generator capacity than originally envisioned is required to address growing demand and to improve functionality of CHDRC’s banquet hall as an emergency heating and cooling shelter. This will necessitate an increase in generator size and capacity from 100 kW to 750 kW. Higher equipment capacity also increased its size, requiring that it be mounted outside of the building, incurring additional costs. For this reason, an additional fee proposal and project has been submitted by TS Engineering Inc. and is recommended to be approved by way of this report. - 221 - CS 20-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Request for Additional Funding for Consulting Services CHDRC Generator Replacement Page 2 Financial Implications: 1. Estimated Project Costing Summary Original scope of work (PO 700753, Dec 11, 2020) $47,660.00 Additional Funding Request: Construction Contract Admin $25,000.00 Air and Noise Assessment 20,000.00 Electrical Coordination and Arc Flash Study 10,000.00 Cost Sub-Consultant 8,000.00 Contingency 12,000.00 Subtotal (Additional Costs) $75,000.00 Total Cost $122,660.00 HST (13%) 15,946.00 Total Gross Project Costs $138,606.00 HST Rebate (11.24%) (13,787.00) Total Net Project Costs $124,819.00 2. Approved Source of Funds - Community Centres Capital Budget Approved Code 5731.1902.6500 Total Funds Source of Funds Debt - 10-Year Internal Loan 5-Year or Fed Gas Tax Reserve Fund Funds Available $1,100,000.00 Funds Required $0.00 124,819.00 $124,819.00 Project Cost under (over) approved funds by ($975,181.00) Staff recommend the approval of an increase in the total net HST project cost to $76,320.00 ($75,000 plus by net HST) from the amount that was approved by the Chief Administrative Officer in a memo dated November 25, 2020. Due to the increase in scope, the award to TS Engineering Inc. will exceed $50,000 and in accordance with the Purchasing Policy, item 10.03 (c), consulting and professional services above $50,000 is subject to the additional approval of Council. The initiating Director shall submit the Report to Council to obtain approval. - 222 - CS 20-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Request for Additional Funding for Consulting Services CHDRC Generator Replacement Page 3 In accordance with the Purchasing Policy item 10.03 (b), the original award of PO 700753 in the amount of $47,660.00 (HST extra) to TS Engineering Inc. was previously approved by the Manager, Supply & Services, (Acting) Director, Community Services, Treasurer and the Chief Administrative Officer. Council approval is being sought at this time for the increase in the total net project cost amount of $76,320.00 in order to address an increase in the scope of work and associated costs. The estimated total consulting costs presented in the report will be financed by an internal loan. Staff will be in contact with the Association Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) to determine if these costs can be either funded 100 per cent or partially by Federal Gas Tax (FGT) funding. The City’s established business process is to seek approval from AMO regarding the use of FGT funding. Discussion: The existing 100kW backup power generator at CHDRC was installed in 2002 and supplies only a small number of life safety systems throughout the recreation complex. The unit has reached the end of its serviceable life. Essential components for its ongoing maintenance are no longer readily available. The City retained TS Engineering Inc. in December 2020 to review existing system capacity and demand, including projecting for current and future needs not covered by the existing generator. A peak demand design load was confirmed and will require a 750 kW generator in order to fully accommodate all identified needs. The most significant source of increase are critical heating and cooling systems that must be on backup power for CHDRC to serve as a viable emergency warming and cooling centre. Provision has been included for the addition of a second generator in the future, in a temporary or permanent capacity, in order to improve overall infrastructure capacity and futureproof the system, including built-in climate resiliency. The larger unit will be too large to fit inside the building, where the current generator is located. It will be located outside, in the back-of-house area where the main electrical and mechanical plant for CHDRC are directly accessible. An air and noise assessment will be needed to ensure that the decibel level of the generator is within thresholds set by applicable standards, and to minimize disruption to neighbouring buildings and properties. These additional services significantly increase the original scope of work, which was based on replacement of the existing interior generator. Upon careful examination of the received proposal and relevant documents received, the Community Services Department recommends approval of the proposed increases in consulting costs for replacement of the backup power generator at CHDRC, in the gross amount of $84,750.00 (HST included), and the net amount of $76,320.00 (net HST rebate). Attachment: None - 223 - CS 20-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Request for Additional Funding for Consulting Services CHDRC Generator Replacement Page 4 Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: Vince Plouffe, OAA, RAIC Ray Rodrigues, CPPB Manager, Facilities Capital Projects Manager, Supply & Services Brian Duffield Stan Karwowski, MBA, CPA, CMA (Acting) Director, Community Services Director, Finance & Treasurer BD:vp Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Marisa Carpino, M.A. Chief Administrative Officer Original Signed By:Original Signed By: Original Signed By:Original Signed By: Original Signed By: - 224 - Report to Council Report Number: CS 22-21 Date: April 26, 2021 From: Brian Duffield (Acting) Director, Community Services Subject: Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce Terms of Reference - File: A-1440 Recommendation: 1. That the Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce Terms of Reference, as amended by the Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce in Attachment 1, be endorsed by Council; and, 2. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. Executive Summary: At the Council meeting of August 24, 2020, Council endorsed Report CS 27-20 (Attachment 2) through Resolution #408/20 which adopted the draft Terms of Reference for the Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce (PABRT), as recommended by the Cultural Advisory Committee. This document contained a provision that makes the newly formed PABRT responsible to propose amendments to the draft Terms of Reference, should they see it, for Council’s consideration. At the Council meeting of January 25, 2021, Council endorsed Confidential Report CS 12-21 through Resolution #513/21 which appointed recommended community representatives to the Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce.Since then, the PABRT has hosted three meetings to, in part, review and revise the Terms of Reference document. Additionally, PABRT also determined a taskforce structure, discussed stipend, appointed an Executive, identified key areas for the action plan, set out taskforce sub-committees, and identified a meeting schedule. At this time, the PABRT is prepared to propose the amended Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce Terms of Reference as set out in Attachment 1 for Council consideration and endorsement. Financial Implications: An amount of $25,000 has been allocated in account 2711.5350.0004 of the 2021 Current Budget for expenses associated with the initiatives of the taskforce. The PABRT will be responsible to provide a proposed Action Plan with related budget expenditures for Council approval each year, and to report quarterly to Council on the progress of the plan. An amount of $20,000 is available in account 2711.1100.0000 to fund the remuneration of taskforce members as proposed by PABRT in the Terms of Reference (Attachment 1 – section 8). - 225 - CS 22-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce Terms of Reference Page 2 Discussion: At the Council Meeting of August 24, 2020, the Anti-Black Racism Action Plan of the Cultural Advisory Committee (CAC) outlined in Report CS 27-20 was approved by Council. This Action Plan was developed so that relevant data can be collected, resources can be identified, and community consultation can be completed and shared with the PABRT. To that end, the CAC identified a PABRT Preparatory Sub-Committee who took on this effort. On February 27, 2021, the PABRT Preparatory Sub-committee attended a special meeting of the CAC to hand over the results of their work to the newly appointed PABRT. This work included a full review of the work to date, review of existing documents, next steps, and survey results. Since the PABRT appointment in January 2021, the Taskforce has met on three occasions: March 3, April 1, and April 8, 2021. During these meetings the taskforce completed the following action items: •comprehensive review and revision of the Terms of Reference; •determined committee structure; •discussed stipend; •appointed an executive; •identified key areas for the Action Plan; •set out taskforce sub-committees; •approved their meeting schedule; •developed administrative processes; and, •amended Terms of Reference document. Through the review and of the draft Terms of Reference, PABRT worked with staff to propose amendments largely reflect additions to Section 7 entitled “Taskforce Structure and “Positions” and Section 8 entitled “Budget”. As per Section 7, PABRT carried out nominations and elections of Executive positions. Furthermore, sub-committee positions have been identified, and will be voted upon in upcoming meetings. 1.Chair | Staff/Government Liaison 2.Vice Chair | Action Plan Development Tracking/Presentations 3.Secretary (two positions) | Committee Administration, Advocacy, Compliance, Accountability, Ethics, Community Hub Liaison, Mediation 4.Treasurer | Budget Tracking, Fund Development Section 8 includes a recommendation that a stipend be provided to PABRT members, consistent with the approach of a neighbouring municipality. The stipend is proposed by the PABRT in recognition of the experiences and skillsets they contribute to the development and implementation of the Pickering Anti-Black Racism Action Plan. The Director, Finance & Treasurer has confirmed that funds are available in account 2711.1100.0000 for the remuneration of taskforce members as proposed in the Terms of Reference. The recommended rate has been set by Human Resources, who evaluated the Terms of Reference against the City’s job evaluation criteria. - 226 - CS 22-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce Terms of Reference Page 3 Moving forward, subject to Council’s approval of the Terms of Reference, the PABRT will appoint sub-committee chairs, form their action plan, and create connections with stakeholders, organizations and the community, and provide an update to Council. Attachments: 1.PABRT Terms of Reference 2.Report CS 27-20 Pickering Anti-Black Racism Initiatives Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: Tanya Ryce Brian Duffield Supervisor, Cultural Services (Acting) Director, Community Services TR:bd Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Marisa Carpino, M.A. Chief Administrative Officer Originally Signed By: Originally Signed By: Originally Signed By: - 227 - Draft Terms of Reference – Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce Terms of Reference – Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce Revised April 8 by PABRT Appointees 1.0 Mandate The Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce (PABRT) is a committee of Council appointees who work in partnership with the Pickering community, Durham-based organizations, businesses, stakeholders, and the City to: •identify barriers and areas of opportunity, in order to enhance the shared experience and opportunities afforded to Black residents, •identify and coordinate opportunities for stakeholder and community engagement, •provide expert input and action on matters relating to the provision of anti- Black racism initiatives within the community; and, •celebrate and promote the Black community, and promote Black culture. 2.0 Goals, Objectives and Responsibilities The Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce will identify and implement actions to fulfill the following goals and objectives: 1.Work towards the continued reduction of anti-Black racism; 2.Ongoing communication with the residents of Pickering to identify existing systemic barriers for Black residents and develop/provide opportunities to address these barriers, provide education, and effect change; 3.Act as a partner in collaboration with the City on initiatives related to anti-Black racism and Equity, Diversity and Inclusion as a stakeholder; 4.Provide advocacy and act as a liaison on behalf of the Black community to the City, as well as organizations and businesses serving the City of Pickering; 5.Strengthen and support Black-led economic development and Black employment initiatives; 6. Support and promote the creation and success of the Black community and cultural organizations; 7. Provide educational resources to build allies within and for the Black community; 8.Conserve and promote Black history and heritage; 9.Celebrate and support success within the Black community; 10. Provide opportunities for the creation, education, and enjoyment of Black culture; 11. Build partnerships and share resources with like-minded organizations to maximize effect, be aware of global best practice, to reduce potential for overlap of services and initiatives; 12. Be inclusive of community residents as per the charter of rights and freedoms; and, Attachment #1 to Report CS 22-21 - 228 - Draft Terms of Reference – Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce 13. Engage stakeholders, businesses, and cultural organizations as partners in the delivery of initiatives. Taskforce responsibilities include: a)Regularly communicate with Pickering residents, businesses, stakeholders, and like-minded organizations (includes taskforces) to fully identify issues, barriers, and opportunities within the mandate of the taskforce. b)Develop an annual action plan for presentation to Council; which identifies primary goals, strategies, implementation schedule, measurement tools, and budgets in response to the goals and objectives of the Taskforce. c)Regularly review the action plan and track results. d)Provide quarterly updates to Council on Taskforce activities. e)Schedule meetings, set agendas, review minutes, and organize sub- committees as needed. f)Promote and support grass roots organizations and community-led anti-Black racism initiatives. g)Deliver programs, education, reconciliation circles, and develop as needed educational resources and toolkits in partnership with the community, related to anti-Black racism, alliance, heritage, and culture. h)Develop and implement recognition and incentives for initiatives that support the Black community and anti-Black racism. i)Advocate, provide guidance and support or partner with initiatives of Durham Region Police Service and Durham School Boards related to anti-Black racism, Black culture, and safety of Black community members. j)Encourage and promote effective communication between the Black community, community cultural groups, individuals, and the City. k)Advise and develop working relationships with owners of businesses, and the Chamber of Commerce. l)Work collaboratively with the City to align priorities and to aid Diversity and Inclusion initiatives of the City. m)Provide consultation, research, resources, report findings and make recommendations as necessary on matters of anti-Black racism, and the promotion of Black culture within the City of Pickering. n)Facilitate education and awareness of federal, provincial and local legislation related to anti-Black racism, accessibility, equity, and inclusion, human rights, and labour. o)Advocate and promote the value and benefit of anti-Black racism initiatives, and Black culture for all. Members do not have the authority to assign work to staff but will work cooperatively and assume related duties as directed by the Taskforce. More specifically, the PABRT will not be responsible for the following: 1.Development of City Diversity & Inclusion initiatives or strategy; 2.Budget approval; 3.City programming or events; 4.Day-to-day operations of the City or City facilities; and 5. Administrative matters including direction given to staff. - 229 - Draft Terms of Reference – Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce 3.0 Composition Up to 20 Taskforce members will be appointed, including: •8 resident representatives (maximum); •12 stakeholders representatives (maximum); All appointees will be voting members regardless of age. 3 City representatives will attend meetings to provide support, and facilitate meetings. •2 City staff liaisons; and, •the Mayor As per Policy ADM 040 resident members must be 18 years of age, reside in Pickering, and represent a broad range of interests, ages, backgrounds, and experience. Youth representation is essential and must be provided a right to vote on the Taskforce. It is strongly recommended that at least one youth sub- committee be mandated who set their own plan in line with the goals and objectives of the Taskforce. Community Organization representatives must be from organizations that serve the City of Pickering. Where possible, appointments to the Committee shall include community leaders, and stakeholder representatives from the African diaspora and the following organizations/associations/areas: •Active anti-Black racism Organizations •Black Business Owners/Chamber of Commerce •Black Cultural Organizations/Diversity Groups •Community Development Council of Durham •Community Safety Organization or Committee •Cultural Advisory Committee •Cultural Expressions - Durham Black History Month •Durham Human Resources Professional Association •Human Rights Organization •LGBTQ Organization •Mental or Public Health Organization •Pickering Public Library •Youth Organization City Staff from the following departments will act as liaisons to the committee: •Community Services Department •Human Resources Department - 230 - Draft Terms of Reference – Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce Staff from other departments, including Legislative Services, Economic Development, and Corporate Services, will be called upon as required by the work of the Taskforce. 4.0 Member Qualifications Qualifications include the skills, knowledge, and lived-experience needed to contribute effectively to Taskforce goals and objectives. Membership will be sought on the basis of broad interest, understanding and commitment to the development of anti-Black racism initiatives in the municipality, in addition to specific expertise and interest related to Black business, culture, education, employment, health, heritage, and safety. Resident appointees must be residents of the City of Pickering. 5.0 Meeting Schedule The Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce meets a minimum of 9 times per year. Established meeting dates and times shall not be changed unless circumstances warrant special consideration. Meetings will not be held in the months of July, August or December unless determined by the Taskforce that a meeting is necessary to meet the mandate or work plan of the Taskforce. During a Municipal election year, meetings shall continue unless determined by the Taskforce that a break in service is necessary. 6.0 Term of the Taskforce Taskforce members will serve for a term of four years starting in March of the year following a Municipal Election until they are no longer able to serve or a new taskforce is appointed. At the end of 2022, the Taskforce will consider in their report to Council broadening the activities to include Community-wide Racism, becoming the Anti- Racism Taskforce. The Taskforce will provide an update before the end of 2022 to be provided to the incoming Council with actions, achievements, and a recommendation/plan on how the Taskforce should continue in the next term. 7.0 Taskforce Structure and Positions The Taskforce may choose to appoint a committee chair, or subcommittees in accordance with Boards and Committee Policy ADM 040. - 231 - Draft Terms of Reference – Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce Chairpersons and Sub-committee chairs will be nominated by a member of the taskforce and receive a majority vote to hold the position. Chair persons will hold a term of no more than 12 months. Should a chair person not be able to attend a meeting, they will assign chair duties to a second member of the taskforce, or request the staff liaisons to lead the meeting. The chairperson will manage the activities of the meeting, develop agendas, and follow up on action items with taskforce members and staff liaisons. The following Executive and Sub-Committee positions are adopted for the 2021 – 2023 Term of the Taskforce: Executive 1.Chair – Staff/Government Liaison 2.Vice Chair – Action Plan Development Tracking/Presentations 3.Secretary (two positions) – Committee Administration, Advocacy, Compliance, Accountability, Ethics, Community Hub Liaison, Mediation 4. Treasurer Sub-committee Positions 1.Executive Advisory Sub Committee eg. Police Services, Human Resources, Faith Groups [Chair + 1] 2.Fund Development [Treasurer +1 ] 3.Policy / Best Practice [research and presentations] 4. Youth 5. Outreach/Communications - Social Media, 'Bang The Table', Fundraising, Youth Recruitment 6. Education as partner with DDSB 7.Employment / Entrepreneurship 8.Health 9.Policing as partner with DRPS 10. Events, Community Engagement, Programming 11. Recognition Program e.g. Procurement, Allyship, Community Champion/Achievement [Chair, Vice Chair, Secretary, Treasurer] 12. Housing/Construction Subcommittees (ADM 040 Section 16.09) will be struck at the direction of the Taskforce by a majority vote, and must include at least two members of the Taskforce, and can include additional relevant stakeholders, experts, or members of the public as needed. Sub-committees must include at least one youth representative from the youth sub-committee. Sub-committee Co-chairs will report to the Taskforce during regular meetings, and results will be recorded as part of the meeting minutes. Sub-committees Chairs will be responsible for recruitment of sub-committee members and organizing activities of the sub-committee in line with the action plan and approval of the taskforce. The Chairs will manage their own administrative practice including meeting schedules, - 232 - Draft Terms of Reference – Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce meeting platform, minutes, agendas, tracking and reporting. Reports to Council regarding sub-committee work will be presented by the Taskforce. 8.0 Budget The Taskforce activities will be paid from the Community Services Boards and Committees account. Remuneration for appointed Taskforce Members will be paid from the Community Services Salary Account. A stipend shall be paid to Members of the Taskforce. The Taskforce Terms of Reference to be reviewed at each term of the taskforce by Human Resource, and a rate assigned. For this term, the rate set is $65/Member and $75 for the Chair or Sub-Committee Chair, per each 2-hour regular Taskforce Meeting (active visible participation in meetings is required). A rate of $25 per hour shall be paid to appointed Members of the Taskforce for work which has been pre-approved by the Taskforce, and recorded in the minutes. A written request must be received by the Taskforce liaison to receive payment. Payments will be issued twice a year. Request for payment must be received by December 15th of each calendar year. Maximum yearly income per Taskforce Member is $1,000.00. A T4 will be issued at the conclusion of the year, or the service of the Taskforce Member. - 233 - Attachment #2 to Report CS 22-21 Report to Council Report Number: CS 27-20 Date: August 24, 2020 From:Brian Duffield (Acting) Director, Community Services Subject: Pickering Anti-Black Racism Initiatives -File: A-1440 Recommendations: 1.That Council adopt the Terms of Reference for the Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce prepared by the Cultural Advisory Committee, as set out in Attachment 1; 2.That Council endorse the Anti-Black Racism Action Plan of the Cultural Advisory Committee, as set out in Attachment 2; and 3.That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. Executive Summary: City staff has identified a three-pronged approach to address racism, diversity and inclusion within Pickering which includes: 1.Establish the Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce in 2020 that will create an action plan to identify and address issues of anti-black racism in Pickering. This will be a community-led initiative. 2.Complete the City of Pickering Diversity & Inclusion Plan in 2021 that will review the City of Pickering’s organizational policies and practices and set out recommendations and action items over a 10 year timeframe. This will be a City-staff led initiative. 3.Hire a consultant in 2021 to facilitate the completion of the City’s Diversity & Inclusion Plan and conduct an unbiased, third party review of The Corporation of the City of Pickering. This will be a City-staff led initiative. The City’s three-pronged approach supported, in principle, by Council through Resolution #375/20 at the Council meeting of July 27, 2020 (see Attachment 3), will serve to identify and address anti- black racism in our community through both a corporate perspective (which focuses inward on our organization) and a community perspective (which focuses outward on our community); providing for robust and comprehensive outcomes. The purpose of this report is to seek Council’s adoption of the terms of reference for the new Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce (PABRT); and seek Council’s endorsement of the Anti- Black Racism Action Plan of the Cultural Advisory Committee (CAC). - 234 - CS 27-20 August 24, 2020 Subject: Pickering Anti-Black Racism Initiatives Financial Implications: With respect to the work of the Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce (PABRT), the Director, Finance & Treasurer has confirmed funding of $25,000 from Account 2711.2392.0000 (Consulting & Professional Services) in 2020. The PABRT will be responsible to provide an action plan with related budget expenditures for Council approval each year, and to report quarterly to Council on program measures. With respect to the City’s Diversity & Inclusion Plan, funds of approximately $75,000 will be added by City staff to the 2021 Current Budget for Council’s consideration and approval (partially funded by Development Charges). Discussion: The City of Pickering is a growing community, rich in diversity. The demographic changes Pickering has experienced will be compounded with the future growth of Seaton. Municipalities, such as ours, must recognize the importance of creating a Diversity & Inclusion Plan to ensure that the needs of our diverse community are understood and supported. Diversity and inclusion relates to matters of multiculturalism, accessibility, economic status, gender, sexual orientation, health and age. Diversity, inclusion and racism are topics that require the engagement, advice, and guidance of subject experts, stakeholders, community leaders and residents to fully realize and achieve meaningful outcomes. Successful implementation of diversity and inclusion strategies requires full consideration and support of an engaged leadership team, workforce and community. As such, City staff and the Cultural Advisory Committee (CAC) have reviewed this topic and have identified a three-pronged approach to address immediate needs, and create long-term results which includes the following: 1. Establish a Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce in 2020 who will create an action plan to identify and address issues of anti-black racism in Pickering. Once struck, the PABRT will be required to develop a plan and measure their progress over a defined period of time and report back to Council, every three months. PABRT will be community-led initiative. 2. Complete a Diversity & Inclusion Plan in 2021 that will review the City of Pickering’s organizational policies and practices which will provide a critical analysis of hiring practices (including recruitment and hiring), training programs, service delivery, program delivery, etc., and bring forward meaningful recommendations over a 10 year timeframe to ensure ongoing inclusivity, access and representation within our organization. This is a City staff- led initiative. 3. Hire a consultant in 2021 to facilitate the completion of the Diversity & Inclusion Plan and conduct an unbiased, third party review of our organization which will include a comprehensive consultation program. This is a City staff-led initiative. This approach is responsive to the feedback and directions received from Council, stakeholders, and residents in the Council adopted Cultural Strategic Plan (2014). The Cultural Strategic Plan identifies diversity and inclusion initiatives as mid-term goals of the plan, and led to the formation - 235 - CS 27-20 August 24, 2020 Subject: Pickering Anti-Black Racism Initiatives of the Cultural Advisory Committee which consists of an expert panel of community residents and stakeholders. 1. Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce (PABRT) – Community-Led Initiative: The current global situation following the death of George Floyd, and the subsequent global call to action, has provided an immediate need to engage the community in meaningful change, and requires leadership and action from the City. From the outset, Council has taken an active role in advocating for action on Anti-Black Racism, releasing a public statement of solidarity, commissioning a display outside of City Hall, and providing support for local residents, and organizations. At their Advisory Committee meeting of June 16, 2020, the Cultural Advisory Committee (CAC) discussed what should be done in Pickering to effect positive change for black residents in light of recent incidents and the Anti-Black Racism movement. Members of the CAC believe they are uniquely positioned to take this on and support the striking of a Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce. The CAC envisions this taskforce to be comprised of representatives of the black community in Pickering, as well as relevant stakeholders and community leaders; along with the Mayor, and staff administrative and operational support from Community Services and Human Resources. To that end, the CAC have prepared the Terms of Reference for the PABRT which includes committee composition, recruitment/appointment process and recommended areas of focus (see Attachment 1). The CAC has also developed an Action Plan so that relevant data can be collected, resources can be identified, and community consultation can be completed in the coming months and shared with the PABRT, once struck (see Attachment 2). To complete the work of the action plan, the CAC has identified PABRT Preparatory Sub-Committee led by Esther Forde, Celia Cooper, Nikosa Holland and Michelle Francis. To solicit public input on the issue of black racism in Pickering, the Preparatory Sub-Committee also plans to administer a survey and will provide that information to the newly formed PABRT to help guide and support their work. That said, the draft survey will first be reviewed and finalized, with the support of a professional consultant in the field of anti-black racism, before implementation. As per section 7 of the PABRT Terms of Reference entitled “Appointment Process”, the Preparatory Sub-Committee will complete a recruitment and applicant screening process bringing forward recommended applicants for appointment by Council. Once struck in late 2020, PABRT will be responsible to propose amendments to the Terms of Reference for Council’s consideration (should they feel it is required), develop a PABRT action plan for Council’s approval and report back to Council quarterly on progress to the plan. PABRT will be community-led where City staff will act as a liaison providing operational and organizational support. The PABRT will work in partnership with the Pickering community, Durham-based organizations, businesses, stakeholders, and the City: - 236 - CS 27-20 August 24, 2020 Subject: Pickering Anti-Black Racism Initiatives  to identify barriers and areas of opportunity, in order to enhance the shared experience and opportunities afforded to black residents;  to identify and coordinate opportunities for stakeholder and community engagement;  to provide expert input and action on matters relating to the provision of Anti-Black Racism initiatives within the community; and,  to celebrate and promote the black community, and promote black culture. Clearly the work of the PABRT will begin conversations, and provide a foundation from which the Diversity & Inclusion Plan process will benefit. The Plan will be invaluable in meeting the needs of our residents and removing barriers to their full participation. These immediate actions will form a basis for the larger conversations on Diversity & Inclusion within the City which was already planned by staff to commence in 2021. The approach will ensure that the City is engaging the community, supporting and providing advocacy to like-minded organizations, celebrating cultural diversity, and providing immediate action and leadership with relation to Anti-Black Racism. These actions will lay the groundwork for successful development and implementation of the full Diversity & Inclusion Plan. 2. City of Pickering Diversity & Inclusion Plan – Corporate Driven Initiative: The Diversity & Inclusion Plan has been included within the most recent version of the City’s Development Charges background study. Subject to Council’s approval of the 2021 Current Budget, staff will proceed to award the Request For Proposal (RFP) in 2021 after engaging in a competitive procurement process. The strategic framework of the Plan will include the development and implementation of diversity and inclusion practices in the City of Pickering:  Employment opportunities, policies and practices (recruitment, development, performance management, training, retention and succession planning);  Programs and services (delivery models);  Community and civic engagement; and,  Neighbourhood strengthening initiatives. The 10 year Plan will identify recommendations to ensure all residents have access to employment opportunities, programs, services and feel welcomed in Pickering. It is important that all our residents are assured inclusivity, access and representation in the way we conduct business. This is a City staff-led initiative, which has been identified as a priority by both the community and Council. 3. Hire A Consultant – Corporate Driven Initiative: A corporate working group comprised of a diverse cross section of the organization was assembled in February 2020 to prepare an RFP to secure the services of a consultant who can assist the City with the completion of the Diversity & Inclusion Plan. Staff are now researching examples of best practices related to such RFPs in preparation for meetings which will commence in August of 2020; where staff will collaborate to prepare the RFP for release in the fall. It is - 237 - CS 27-20 August 24, 2020 Subject: Pickering Anti-Black Racism Initiatives anticipated that a consultant will be selected by years end so they may commence work early in 2021. The hiring of a consultant is very important as it provides for an unbiased assessment of the City’s organizational and operational practices by an independent third party. This consultant will consider global and nation-wide best practices, personal accounts/perspectives from staff and customers/residents (through a robust consultation process), and identify the gaps before making recommendations for necessary corporate changes. This is an essential step in creating a fulsome Diversity & Inclusion Plan. The City’s planned three-pronged approach to identify and address anti-black racism in our community, through both a corporate perspective (which focuses inward on our organization) and a community perspective (which focuses outward on our community), is anticipated to provide robust and comprehensive outcomes. Attachments: 1. Terms of Reference for the Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce 2. Cultural Advisory Committee Anti-Black Racism Action Plan 3. Council Resolution #375/20, Directive Memorandum dated July 31, 2020 - 238 - CS 27-20 August 24, 2020 Subject: Pickering Anti-Black Racism Initiatives Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: Original Signed By: Original Signed By: Tanya Ryce Brian Duffield Supervisor, Cultural Services (Acting) Director, Community Services Original Signed By: Jennifer Eddy Director, Human Resources BD:tr Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Original Signed By: Marisa Carpino, M.A. Interim Chief Administrative Officer - 239 - Attachment #1 to Report CS 27-20 Terms of Reference – Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce Terms of Reference 1.0 Mandate The Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce (PABRT) is a committee of Council appointees who work in partnership with the Pickering community, Durham-based organizations, businesses, stakeholders, and the City:  to identify barriers and areas of opportunity, in order to enhance the shared experience and opportunities afforded to Black residents,  to identify and coordinate opportunities for stakeholder and community engagement,  to provide expert input and action on matters relating to the provision of anti- Black racism initiatives within the community; and,  to celebrate and promote the Black community, and promote Black culture. 2.0 Goals, Objectives and Responsibilities The Pickering Anti-Racism Taskforce will identify and implement actions to fulfill the following goals and objectives: 1. Work towards the reduction/elimination of anti-Black racism. 2. Ongoing communication with the residents of Pickering to identify existing systemic barriers for Black residents and develop/provide opportunities to address these barriers, provide education, and effect change. 3. Produce an annual action plan and report to Council within the first three months of operation; which identifies primary goals, measurement tools, implementation plans, timelines, and budget. 4. Provide advocacy and leadership on behalf of the Black community to the City, as well as organizations and businesses serving the City of Pickering. 5. Strengthen and support Black-led economic development and Black employment initiatives. 6. Support the creation and success of Black community and cultural organizations. 7. Provide educational resources to build allies within and for the Black community. 8. Conserve and promote Black history and heritage. 9. Celebrate and support success within the Black community. 10.Provide opportunities for the creation, education, and enjoyment of Black culture. 11.Build partnerships and share resources with like-minded organizations to maximize benefit, be aware of global best practice, to reduce potential for overlap of services and initiatives. 12.Be inclusive of all community residents at all levels and abilities; and, 13.Engage stakeholders, businesses, and cultural organizations as partners in the delivery of initiatives. - 240 - Terms of Reference – Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce Taskforce responsibilities include: a) Review and revise name, and update terms of reference for the Taskforce, as may be applicable, and submit to the City Clerk for Council approval within one month of the first meeting. b) Regularly communicate with Pickering residents, organizations, businesses, stakeholders, and like-minded organizations to fully identify issues, barriers, and opportunities within Pickering. c) Develop an annual action plan for presentation to Council; which identifies primary goals, strategies, implementation schedule, measurement tools, and budgets in response to the goals and objectives of the Taskforce. d) Regularly review the action plan and track results. e) Provide quarterly updates to Council on Taskforce activities. f) Schedule meetings, set agendas, review minutes, and organize sub- committees as needed. g) Promote and support grass roots organizations and community-led anti-Black racism initiatives. h) Deliver programs, education, reconciliation circles, and develop as needed educational resources and toolkits in partnership with the community, related to anti-Black racism, alliance, heritage, and culture. i) Develop and implement recognition and incentives for initiatives that support the Black community and anti-Black racism. j) Advocate, provide guidance and support or partner with initiatives of DRPS and Durham School Boards related to anti-Black racism, Black culture, and safety of Black community members. k) Encourage and promote effective communication between the Black community, community cultural groups, individuals, and the City. l) Advise and develop working relationships with owners of businesses, Business Improvement Areas (BIA) and the Chamber of Commerce. m) Work collaboratively with the City to align priorities and to aid Diversity and Inclusion initiatives of the City. n) Provide consultation, research, resources, report findings and make recommendations as necessary on matters of anti-Black racism, and the promotion of Black culture within the City of Pickering. o) Be knowledgeable of federal, provincial and local legislation related to anti- Black racism, equity, and inclusion, human rights, and labour; and provide advice, advocacy, and education within the community. p) Advocate and promote the value and benefit of anti-Black racism, and Black culture for all; and Members do not have the authority to assign work to staff but will work cooperatively and assume related duties as directed by the Taskforce. More specifically, the ABRT will not be responsible for the following: Development of City Diversity & Inclusion initiatives or strategy; 1. Budget approval; 2. City programming or events; 3. Day-to-day operations of the City or City facilities; and 4. Administrative matters including direction given to staff. - 241 - Terms of Reference – Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce 3.0 Composition Up to 23 Taskforce members will be appointed, including:  8 resident representatives (maximum);  12 stakeholders representatives (maximum);  2 City staff liaisons; and the  Mayor All appointees will be voting members regardless of age. As per the policy ADM 040 resident members must be 18 years of age, reside in Pickering, and represent a broad range of interests, ages, backgrounds, and experience. Youth representation is essential and must be provided a right to vote on the Taskforce. It is strongly recommended that at least one youth sub- committee be mandated who set their own plan in-line with the goals and objectives of the Taskforce. Community Organization representatives must be from organizations who serve the City of Pickering. Where possible, appointments to the Committee shall include community leaders, and stakeholder representatives from the African diaspora and the following organizations/ associations/areas:  Active anti-Black racism Organizations  Black Business Owners/Chamber of Commerce  Black Cultural Organizations/Diversity Groups  Community Development Council of Durham  Community Safety Organization or Committee  Cultural Advisory Committee  Cultural Expressions -Durham Black History Month  Durham Human Resources Professional Association  Human Rights Organization  LGBQT Organization  Mental or Public Health Organization  Pickering Public Library  Youth Organization City Staff from the following departments will act as liaisons to the committee:  Community Services Department  Human Resources Department Staff from other departments, including Legislative Services, Economic - 242 - Terms of Reference – Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce Development, and Corporate Services, will be appointed and called upon as required by the work of the Taskforce. The Taskforce may choose to appoint a committee chair, or subcommittees in accordance with Boards and Committee Policy ADM 040. Subcommittees (ADM 040 Section 16.09) will be struck at the direction of the Taskforce by a majority vote, and must include at least two members of the Taskforce, and can include additional relevant stakeholders, experts, or members of the public as needed. Sub-committees will report to the Taskforce during regular meetings, and results will be recorded as part of the meeting minutes. Sub-committees are not required to keep minutes, and reports to Council regarding sub-committee work will be presented by the Taskforce. 4.0 Member Qualifications Qualifications include the skills, knowledge, and lived experience needed to contribute effectively to Taskforce goals and objectives. Membership will be sought on the basis of broad interest, understanding and commitment to the development of anti-Black racism initiatives in the municipality, in addition to specific expertise and interest related to Black business, culture, education, employment, health, heritage, and safety. Resident appointees must be residents of the City of Pickering. 5.0 Meeting Schedule The Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce meets a minimum of 9 times per year. Established meeting dates and times shall not be changed unless circumstances warrant special consideration. Meetings will not be held in the months of July, August or December unless determined by the Taskforce that a meeting is necessary to meet the mandate or work plan of the Taskforce. During a Municipal election year, meetings shall not be held after September 30th unless determined by the Taskforce that a meeting is necessary to meet the requirements of the mandate or work plan. 6.0 Term of the Taskforce The taskforce will serve until the end of the 2019 – 2022 term of Council. At the end of 2021, the Taskforce will consider in their report to Council broadening the activities to include Community wide Racism, becoming the Anti- Racism Taskforce. - 243 - Terms of Reference – Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce The Taskforce will provide an update before the end of 2022 to be provided to the incoming Council with actions, achievements, and a recommendation/plan on how the Taskforce should continue in the next term. 7.0 Appointment Process The Cultural Advisory Committee will strike a sub-committee consisting of up to 6 committee members to work with staff liaisons and the Clerks office to nominate Taskforce members for Council appointment. The recruitment phase will consist of an open call for applicant’s in-line with policy ADM 040. Members of the Cultural Advisory Committee will effect an enhanced call for application in two ways. 1. Identify organizations, stakeholders, and individuals to whom they would like an invitation sent. 2. Reaching out to the community through a survey to collect community comment, which includes information on how to apply to become part of the Taskforce (see appendix a – community survey on Anti-Black Racism and Diversity) Application review will be undertaken by the CAC sub-committee. Personal information will be redacted prior to review. The sub-committee will recommend suitable applicants for round-table interviews. Selected applicants will attend round-table discussions to gauge interest, suitability, collaboration, and readiness to contribute to Taskforce objectives. A staff liaison and sub-committee member will lead round-table discussions, and provide a rating of the candidates, based upon a set criteria. The sub-committee will review results and prepare the recommended list of applicant’s in-line with the Taskforce composition guidelines for appointment by Council. Once complete, an update will be provided by the sub-committee to the Cultural Advisory Committee that this list is ready to be provided to Council by the staff liaison. - 244 - Attachment #2 to Report CS 27-20 2020 Cultural Advisory Committee Actions on Anti-Black Racism Anti-Black Racism Taskforce development, continuing actions of the Cultural Plan goals and objectives related to -Diversity & Inclusion, and celebrating Black culture Budget Implications 2020 $25,000 in contingency funding as per Director, Finance and Treasurer Action Details Required Resources Timeline Creation of CAC Subcommittee Working Groups The CAC will strike subcommittee working groups to undertake the work of the Anti-Black Racism Action Plan. CAC & Staff time July – August 2020 Anti-Black The CAC will release a community survey on Anti-Promotions Survey development July 2020 Racism Survey black Racism to inform the plans and actions of the taskforce. This will be undertaken during the recruitment process for the committee, and providing immediate action, and increasing the reach of the recruitment call. The CAC will summarize the results of the survey for the use of the incoming taskforce. $3500 (see survey for proposed marketing plan) Promotions preparation August 2020 Survey Release September 2020 Results Compilation October 2020 Results review CAC meeting November 2020 Create an The CAC and staff will compile an extensive listing CAC and Staff time July and ongoing expansive listing of agencies and organizations serving the Black of organizations community, promoting Black culture, or providing and agencies advocacy. Staff and CAC will consult with internal serving the Black and external stakeholders to compile the list. Community The listing will be shared on the City website, used for engagement in the survey, committee recruitment, and to build alliances and partnerships. - 245 - Taskforce Resource File The CAC and staff will work to collect an electronic collection of relevant resources, such as regional strategic plans related to Diversity or Anti-Black Racism, examples of best practice, tool kits, news articles, and index for the immediate use of the taskforce once formed. CAC and Staff Time Ongoing Taskforce Recruitment The Cultural Advisory Committee will strike a sub-committee consisting of up to 6 committee members to work with staff liaisons and the Clerks office to nominate Taskforce members for Council appointment. The recruitment phase will consist of an open call for applicants in-line with policy ADM 040. Members of the Cultural Advisory Committee will effect an enhanced call for application in two ways. 1. Identify organizations, stakeholders, and individuals to whom they would like an invitation sent. 2. Reaching out to the community through a survey to collect community comment, which includes information on how to apply to become part of the Taskforce (see attachment community survey on Anti-Black Racism and Diversity) Application review will be undertaken by the sub-committee. Personal information will be redacted by staff prior to review. The sub-committee will Development of Terms of Reference and Action Plan June/July 2020 Report to Council submitted July 15, 2020 Authorization of Director July 17, 2020 Review of Interim CAO July 19, 2020 Endorsement of Documents CAC Aug 6, 2020 Report to Clerks Aug 13, 2020 Report in Council August 24, 2020 Motion of Council provided to staff August 26 – 29 Survey launch and taskforce call August 31. Taskforce call closes October 1 Review of applications completed October 5 - 246 - recommend suitable applicants for round-table interviews. Selected applicants will attend round- table discussions to gauge interest, suitability, collaboration, and readiness to contribute to Taskforce objectives. A staff liaison and sub-committee member will lead round-table discussions, and provide a rating of the candidates, based upon a set criteria. The sub-committee will review results against the taskforce composition and prepare the recommended list of applicants, for appointment by Council. Once complete, an update will be provided by the sub-committee to the Cultural Advisory Committee that this list is ready to be provided to Council by the staff liaison. The names of the recommended applicants will be provided by the staff liaison in a report to Council, with all applications attached. The above actions follow the required process of ADM 040 Boards and Committees Policy Scheduling of candidates October 6 - 9 Round table October 12 -15 Subcommittee meets to finalize list of recommended candidates October 16 Report prepared and for CAC Advised October 20 Report with names and all applications sent to Director/Clerk October 30 Council appoints recommended candidates November 23 Candidates are advised of appointment by Clerks First meeting of taskforce January 2021. Round Table/Reconciliation Hire a Facilitator to host 10+ sessions $12,000 Survey Questions have been Circles/Focus Groups (2 per day, 5 days) across Pickering at different locations and facilities, including places of worship, and Facilitators fees Hospitality Costs Promotions developed and approved by the CAC. Schedule and Facilitator confirmation August 2020. - 247 - Operated in partnership with organizations and agencies across Pickering; to ensure typically unreachable communities are engaged. Discussions in line with the goals and objectives of the taskforce, as well as providing a facilitated discussion following the content of the survey. Feedback will be collected and summarized by the CAC for the use of the taskforce. cultural centres. Group size based upon current provincial restrictions, committee will also consider web-ex facilitated conversations and data collection to maximize participation. Technological Support Promotion/Registration-September 2020. Round Table/Focus Groups to commence at the end of Operation last week of September 2020/First week of October 2020 Listing of Black Artists and Staff will work with the CAC to develop Staff time July – August 2020 Cultural Organizations a listing and intake of Black cultural organizations and artists. With permission of the artists and organizations, listings can be included in the City website, Cultural portal, and be used as a resource to celebrate Black culture. Internally the list will ensure opportunities for participation are shared with the Black community. Cultural Celebrations To celebrate and support Black cultural organizations, cultural pop-up events $4500 (6 x $750 per for CAC and staff will develop a listing of cultural organizations and artists to Support and Celebrate Black will be organized within the community performance fees, support this initiative in August 2020 culture within the community. and shared online and through social media. The pop-ups will highlight Black culture from across the African Diaspora, Pop-ups will occur across Pickering, in highly visible locations. and production costs) and the open call for taskforce membership. Open Call early August 2020, pop-up events September – early October 2020. - 248 - Locations will be carefully selected to maximize impact and reach. Place4Arts -Outdoor Exhibit showcasing Black Artists Black artists will be invited to share their artwork in temporary outdoor exhibitions in key areas of the City. Installations will be positioned throughout Pickering, Artists from the Black Community will be called to submit a proposal for the display of their work. Installations may take the shape of banners, wraps, temporary community art projects, playable art (i.e. Piano), performance art or other. Final installations will be featured on the open data portal, tracked within the public art installation database, and presented to the public through social media and marketing initiatives. $5000 (4 artists, $1250 per installation to include production and installation costs) Staff will work with the CAC to develop a listing and intake of Black artists in the community, which will be included in the City’s listing of community artists, as well as forming a list of artists to whom the Community Banner program will be promoted to, and to whom the CAC will directly commission to participate in this project. July 2020. Call to Artist criteria (July 2020), commission August 2020. Pieces created and designed in September 2020. Final installation in Early October. Black Business Summary CAC will collect and summarize the current work of economic development, the Region of Durham, The Ajax Pickering Board of Trade, and the Black Chamber of Commerce related to the promotion and development of Black Business in Pickering and Durham Region and will prepare a summary and resource documents for the use of the Taskforce Committee Time Outreach and Compilation October/November 2020 Alliance and Education Add a new Diversity Tab and content to Committee and Framework identified August 2020. Online Resources made the Cultural Portal web pages of Staff Time Resources identified and linked available on the Cultural Portal Pickering.ca that includes details on the City’s actions related to Anti- Racism, Diversity and Inclusion, and provide a curated of resources to August – September 2020 Launch November 2020 Updates and promotion Ongoing - 249 - assist residents with self-education and alliance. Resources will be streamed for children, adults, business, and organizations. Once established, this resource will be promoted and shared with partners and like-minded organizations. Outreach to Black The City of Pickering would like to Committee and Ongoing Community Groups to support the work, messages and reach Staff Time display in and around City of our local Black Community groups Facilities and Parks. by offering them opportunities to set-up display, information booths, and engage with residents by offering facility/outdoor space, and marketing a t no charge. Total $25,000 - 250 - Attachment #3 to Report CS 27-20 Legislative Services Division Clerk’s Office Directive Memorandum July 31, 2020 To: Marisa Carpino Interim Chief Administrative Officer From: Susan Cassel City Clerk Subject: Direction as per Minutes of the Meeting of City Council held on July 27, 2020 Corr. 35-20 Marisa Carpino, Interim Chief Administrative Officer City of Pickering Re: Anti-Black Racism Strategy -Summary Council Decision Resolution #375/20 1. That Council support in principle the 3 pronged approach as presented by the Interim CAO; 2. That the Cultural Advisory Committee be instructed to amend their 2020 Work Plan to include the initiatives that have been committed to by the Interim CAO including measuring; and, 3. That the Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce be requested to provide Quarterly updates to Council on the status of their work in the area of Anti-Black Racism, Diversity and Inclusion with a tracking of their targeted outcomes. A copy of the original correspondence is attached for your reference. Please take any action deemed necessary. Susan Cassel Enclosure Copy: (Acting) Director, Community Services City Clerk - 251 - CAO 28-20 Memo To: Deputy Mayor Ashe and Members of Council July 10, 2020 From: Marisa Carpino Interim CAO Copy: (Acting) Director, Community Services Director, Human Resources Supervisor, Cultural Services Subject: Anti-Black Racism Strategy -Summary File: A-1200-007 Further to my comments at the Council meeting of June 29 th regarding staff’s plans to address issues of Racism, Diversity and Inclusion within Pickering, please find below a summary of this three pronged approach. 1. Diversity & Inclusion Plan Subject to Council’s approval of the 2021 Current Budget, the City of Pickering will create and implement a Diversity and Inclusion Plan in 2021. The City of Pickering is a growing community, rich in diversity. The demographic changes Pickering has experienced will be compounded with the future grown of Seaton. Municipalities, such as ours, must recognize the importance of creating a Diversity and Inclusion Plan to ensure that the needs of our diversifying community are understood and met. Diversity and inclusion relates to matters of multiculturalism, accessibility, economic status, gender, sexual orientation , health and age. The Plan will be invaluable in meeting the needs of our residents and removing barriers for their full participation. The strategic framework of the Plan will include the development and implementation of diversity and inclusion practices in the City of Pickering:  Employment opportunities and practices (recruitment, hiring, training);  Programs and services (delivery models);  Community and civic engagement; and  Neighbourhood strengthening initiatives. The 10-year Plan will identify recommendations to ensure all residents have a ccess to employment opportunities, programs, services and feel welcomed in Pickering. It is important that all our residents are assured inclusivity, access and representation in the way we conduct business. This is a City staff led initiative. - 252 - 2. Hire a Consultant A corporate City staff team has been assembled since February 2020 to prepare an RFP to secure the services of a consultant who can assist the City with the completion of the Diversity and Inclusion Plan. This approach is very important as it provides for an unbiased assessment of the City’s organizational and operational practices by an independent third party consultant. This consultant will consider global and nation-wide best practices, personal accounts/perspectives from staff and customers/residents (through a robust consultation program), and identify the gaps making recommendations for necessary corporate changes. The Diversity and Inclusion Plan has been included within the most recent version of the City’s Development Charges (DC) background study. Subject to Council’s approval of the 2021 Current Budget, staff will proceed to award the RFP after engaging in a competitive procurement process in 2021. 3. Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce At their advisory committee meeting of June 16, 2020, the Cultural Advisory Committee (CAC) discussed what should be done in Pickering to effect positive change for black residents in light of recent incidents and the anti-black racism movement. Members of the CAC felt that they were uniquely positioned to take this on and supports the striking of a Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce. As per the CAC, this taskforce is envisioned to be comprised of representatives of the black community in Pickering, as well as relevant stakeholders and community leaders. The CAC, with the support of designated City staff, will prepare the terms of reference for this taskforce to include committee composition, selection and recommended areas of focus. Community Services staff will bring this information back to Council, for their consideration and approval, by way of a report anticipated for the August 10, 2020 Executive Committee meeting agenda. The Pickering Anti-Black Racism Taskforce will be a community driven initiative where City staff will act as a liaison providing operational and organizational support. The City’s planned three pronged approach to identify and address anti-black racism in our community, through both a corporate perspective (which focuses inward on our organization) and a community perspective (which focuses outward on our community), is anticipated to provide robust and comprehensive outcomes. This summary of the City’s planned three pronged approach will form part of staff’s report anticipated for the August 10, 2020 Executive Committee meeting agenda; thereby, becoming part of the public record. :mc July 10, 2020 Page 2 of 2 Anti-Black Racism Strategy - 253 - Report to Council Report Number: ENG 09-21 Date: April 26, 2021 From: Richard Holborn Director, Engineering Services Subject: Asphalt Resurfacing on Various City Streets - Tender No. T2021-1 - File: A-1440 Recommendation: 1. That Tender No. T2021-1 for Asphalt Resurfacing on Various City Streets as submitted by Viola Management Inc. in the total tendered amount of $2,478,485.27 (HST included) be accepted; 2. That Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions be retained to provide materials testing services based on unit rates submitted at an estimated cost of $99,976.75 (HST included) in accordance with Purchasing Policy Item 10.03 (c); 3. That the total gross project cost of $2,880,429.00 (HST included), including the tendered amount, a contingency and other associated costs, and the total net project cost of $2,593,916.00 (net of HST rebate) be approved; 4. That Council authorize the Director, Finance & Treasurer to finance the total net project cost as approved in the 2021 Roads Capital Budget, and the amount be increased from $2,465,000.00 to $2,593,916.00 to be funded by a transfer from the Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund; and, 5. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. Executive Summary: As part of the 2021 Roads Projects Capital Budget, asphalt resurfacing and top asphalt road treatments were approved as construction projects for the following 14 locations: • Batory Avenue • Grenoble Boulevard • Diefenbaker Court • Parkside Drive • Aspen Road • Pickering Parkway • Rambleberry Avenue • Wellington Street • Lorn Street • Deerbrook Drive • Liverpool Road • Dunbarton Road • Sixth Concession Road (top asphalt) • Barber Street (top asphalt) - 254 - ENG 09-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Asphalt Resurfacing on Various City Streets Tender No. T2021-1 Page 2 As part of the 2016 Road Needs Study endorsed by Council through Report ENG 25-17 (Council Resolution #374/17), these streets have been identified and have been recommended for resurfacing improvements. The 2016 Road Needs Study is used by staff as a resource document for identifying and planning maintenance, rehabilitation and reconstruction strategies, programs and projects for all Pickering roads. The 2021 roads selected for asphalt resurfacing align with the priorities of the Road Needs Study. Tender No. T2021-1 was issued on Wednesday, March 17, 2021 with a tender closing date of Tuesday, April 13, 2021. Nine companies submitted a bid for this project. The low bid of $2,478,485.27 (HST included) submitted by Viola Management Inc. is recommended for approval. The total gross project cost is estimated at $2,880,429.00 (HST included) with an estimated total net project cost of $2,593,916.00 (net of HST rebate). Financial Implications: 1. Tender Amount Tender No. T2021-1 $2,193,349.80 HST (13%) $285,135.47 Total $2,478,485.27 2. Estimated Project Costing Summary Tender No. T2021-1 – Tender for Asphalt Resurfacing on Various City Streets $2,193,350.00 Associated Costs Materials Testing 90,000.00 Federal Gas Tax Sponsor Signage 2,500.00 Construction Contingency (12%) 263,202.00 Sub Total – Costs $2,549,052.00 HST (13%) 331,377.00 Total Gross Project Cost $2,880,429.00 HST Rebate (11.24%) (286,513.00) Total Net Project Cost $2,593,916.00 - 255 - ENG 09-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Asphalt Resurfacing on Various City Streets Tender No. T2021-1 Page 3 3.Approved Source of Funds Location Expense Code Source of Funds Budget Required Batory Avenue 5320.2110.6251 Federal Gas Tax $385,000.00 $377,874.00 Grenoble Boulevard 5320.2111.6251 Federal Gas Tax 240,000.00 227,990.00 Diefenbaker Court 5320.2112.6251 Federal Gas Tax 150,000.00 164,251.00 Parkside Drive 5320.2113.6251 Federal Gas Tax 210,000.00 220,706.00 Aspen Road 5320.2114.6251 Federal Gas Tax 195,000.00 202,730.00 Pickering Parkway 5320.2115.6251 Federal Gas Tax 275,000.00 292,969.00 Rambleberry Avenue 5320.2116.6251 Federal Gas Tax 345,000.00 352,794.00 Wellington Street 5320.2117.6251 Federal Gas Tax 90,000.00 128,148.00 Lorn Street 5320.2118.6251 Federal Gas Tax 60,000.00 89,625.00 Deerbrook Drive 5320.2119.6251 Federal Gas Tax 140,000.00 146,580.00 Liverpool Road 5320.2120.6251 Federal Gas Tax 110,000.00 116,277.00 Dunbarton Road 5320.2122.6251 Federal Gas Tax 145,000.00 150,708.00 Sixth Concession Road 5320.2103.6251 Federal Gas Tax 90,00.00 86,010.00 Barber Street 5320.2109.6251 Federal Gas Tax 30,000.00 37,254.00 $2,465,000.00 $2,593,916.00 Net project cost (over) under approved funds ($128,916.00) As the total net project cost exceeds the approved budget for the asphalt resurfacing program, staff is recommending that available funds in the Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund be drawn upon to fund the difference. - 256 - ENG 09-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Asphalt Resurfacing on Various City Streets Tender No. T2021-1 Page 4 Note that the Sixth Concession Road project has a repair component that is not included in this current asphalt resurfacing award. This component will be funded from the Roads and Bridges Reserve Fund in the amount of $90,000.00. For this reason, the approved amount for the repairs component is not reflected in Table 3 above. Discussion: As part of the 2021 Roads Projects Capital Budget, asphalt resurfacing, and final lift of asphalt for the following locations were approved as construction projects: • Batory Avenue – from Breezy Drive to Vistula Drive; • Grenoble Boulevard – from Naroch Boulevard (south leg) to Fuschia Lane; • Diefenbaker Court – from Valley Farm Road to east terminus; • Parkside Drive – from 150m north of New Street to Aspen Road; • Aspen Road – from New Street to 150m north of Pebble Court; • Pickering Parkway – from Dreyber Court to Brock Road (Regional Road #1); • Rambleberry Avenue – from Kelvinway Lane (south leg) to Rambleberry Avenue; • Wellington Street – from Victoria Street to Lorn Street; • Lorn Street – from Wellington Street to Central Street; • Deerbrook Drive – from Glenanna Road to Silverthorn Square; • Liverpool Road – from Tatra Drive to Bayly Street; • Dunbarton Road – from 20m west of Cloudberry Court to Dixie Road; • Barber Street (top asphalt)– from Central Street to the north terminus; and • Sixth Concession Road (top asphalt) – from Greenwood Road to Westney Road. These streets are indicated in the 2016 Road Needs Study as priority streets for asphalt resurfacing. Also, as part of the 2021 Roads Projects Capital Budget, the final lift of asphalt on both Barber Street and the Sixth Concession Road were approved as construction projects. The final lift of asphalt will complete previous projects Tender No. T2020-24 Barber Street – Road Reconstruction and Tender No. T-6-2017 Sixth Concession Road – Road Reconstruction. Tender No. T2021-1 was issued on Wednesday, March 17, 2021 with a tender closing date of Tuesday, April 13, 2021. Nine companies submitted a bid for this project. The low bid of $2,478,485.27 (HST included) submitted by Viola Management Inc. is recommended for approval. The total gross project cost is estimated at $2,880,429.00 (HST included) with an estimated total net project cost of $2,593,916.00 (net of HST rebate). Engineering Services invites material testing companies to provide unit rates for materials engineering and testing services, which the City uses on various capital projects throughout the year. Based on the unit rates submitted by Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, their fees estimated for this project are $99,976.75 (HST included). Further, in accordance with Purchasing Policy Item 10.03 (c), where written proposals are obtained by the Director without going through a competitive process, and funds are available in the approved Budget: (c) an award above $50,000 is subject to the additional approval of Council. The initiating Director shall submit the Report to Council to obtain approval. - 257 - ENG 09-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Asphalt Resurfacing on Various City Streets Tender No. T2021-1 Page 5 The award of Tender No. T2021-1 to the low bidder, Viola Management Inc., will be conditional upon receiving the City’s Health & Safety form, Certificate of Insurance and Waste Management Plan and requisite approvals. Previous work experience of Viola Management Inc. is deemed to be acceptable. Upon careful examination of all tenders, the Engineering Services Department recommends acceptance of the low bid submitted by Viola Management Inc. for Tender No. T2021-1 in the amount of $2,478,485.27 (HST included), and that the total net project cost of $2,593,916.00 (net of HST rebate) be approved. Due to the ongoing concerns and new business practices related to the COVID-19 pandemic, Engineering Services and Corporate Services staff will work with Viola Management Inc., to ensure that proper procedures and protocols are in place to provide a safe work environment for Pickering residents, the contractor, sub-contractors, and City staff. These measures may include a delay to the start date of the project. Attachments: 1.Supply & Services Memorandum dated April 14, 2021 2.Record of Tenders Opened and Checked 3.Location Maps - 258 - ENG 09-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Asphalt Resurfacing on Various City Streets Tender No. T2021-1 Page 6 Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: Scott Booker Richard Holborn, P.Eng. Manager, Capital Projects & Infrastructure Director, Engineering Services Stan Karwowski, MBA, CPA, CMA Director, Finance & Treasurer Ray Rodrigues, CPPB Manager, Supply & Services SM:DL:mjh Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Marisa Carpino, M.A. Chief Administrative Officer Original signed by:Original signed by: Original signed by: Original signed by: Original signed by: - 259 - To: Richard Holborn Director, Engineering Services April 14, 2021 From: Lisa Chang Buyer, Supply & Services Copy: Administrative Assistant, Engineering Services Subject: Tender No. T2021-1 Tender for Asphalt Resurfacing on Various City Streets Closed: April 13, 2021 – 2:00pm File: F-5400-001 Tender No. T2021-1 was advertised on the City’s website on March 17, 2021. Nine companies have submitted a bid for this project. A copy of the Record of Tenders Opened and Checked used at the public tender opening is attached. Tenders shall be irrevocable for 60 days after the official closing date and time. Purchasing Procedure No. PUR 010-001, Item 13.03 (r) provides checking tendered unit prices and extensions unit prices shall govern and extensions will be corrected accordingly, which has been completed by S&S and Viola Management Inc. is the compliant low bid at a value of $2,193,349.80 The unsuccessful Bidder’s tendering deposit, other than a bid bond, shall be returned to the applicable bidders as provided for by Purchasing Procedure No. PUR 010 -001, Item 13.03 (w). Three (3) bids have been retained for review at this time and are attached. Pursuant to Information to Bidders Item 24 Pre-Condition of Award and Item 20 Tendering Specifications, the following documentation will be requested of Viola Management Inc. for your review during the evaluation stage of this tender call. Please advise if Supply & Services is to proceed with collecting the following documentation: (a) A copy of the City’s Health and Safety Policy form currently dated and signed; (b) A copy of the current Clearance Certificate issued by Workplace Safety & Insurance Board; (c) The City’s certificate of insurance or approved alternative form completed by the Bidder’s agent, broker or insurer; and (d) Waste Management Plan. A budget of $2,465,000 was provided to Supply & Services for this procurement. Memo Attachment #1 to Report # ENG 09-21 - 260 - Page 2 If the recommendation to award exceeds the budgeted amount, refer to Financial Control Policy Item 11 for additional instructions. In accordance with Purchasing Policy Item 06.04, the authority for the dollar limit as set out below excludes HST. As such, in accordance with Purchasing Policy Item 06.11, where the compliant quotation or tender meeting specifications and offering best value to the City is acceptable or where the highest scoring proposal is recommended and the estimated total purchase price is: (c) Over $250,000 the Manager may approve the award, subject to the approval of the Director, Treasurer, CAO and Council. Please include the following items in your report: 1. if Items (a) through (b) noted above are acceptable to the Co-ordinator, Health & Safety or designate, if required; 2. if Item (c) is acceptable to the Manager, Budgets & Internal Audit; 3. if the list of subcontractors is acceptable to Engineering Services; 4. if Item (d) is acceptable to Engineering Services; 5. any past work experience with low bidder Viola Management Inc. including work location; 6. without past work experience, if reference information is acceptable to Engineering Services; 7. the appropriate account number(s) to which this work is to be charged; 8. the budget amount(s) assigned thereto; 9. Treasurer’s confirmation of funding; 10. related departmental approvals; and 11. related comments specific to the project. After receiving Council’s approval, an approved “on-line” requisition will be required to proceed. Enquiries can be directed to the City’s website for the unofficial bid results as read out at the public tender opening or to Supply & Services. Bidders will be advised of the outcome in due course. If you require further information, please feel free to contact me or a member of Supply & Services. lc Attachments - 261 - City of Pickering Record of Tenders Opened and Checked Tender Description: Asphalt Resurfacing on Various City Streets Tender No.: T2021-1 Date: April 13, 2021 - 2:00 pm Local Time Bidder Name Total Tendered Amount (HST Excluded) Comments PTR Paving Inc. $3,127,815.09 Di Gregorio Group of Companies $3,091,680.00 Forest Contractors $2,811,630.50 Ashland Construction Group Ltd. $2,476,400.00 IPAC Paving Limited $3,162,657.45 Four Seasons Site Development Ltd $2,433,915.70 Brennan Paving & Construction Ltd. $2,675,186.75 Coco Paving $2,825,598.50 VIOLA MANAGEMENT INC. $2,193,349.80 City Staff Present Other Attachment #2 to Report # ENG 09-21 - 262 - ___________________ _____________________ _____________________ ________________ The information is strictly preliminary, pending review and verification of conformance to terms, conditions and specificatio ns. - 263 - Location Maps Project Area No. 1 – Diefenbaker Court Diefenbaker Court – from Valley Farm Road to East Terminus. The proposed work includes asphalt resurfacing. Existing concrete curbs and gutters and sidewalks that are deficient shall be removed and replaced as required. Project Area No. 2 – Parkside Drive Parkside Drive – from 150m north of New Street to Aspen Road. The proposed work includes asphalt resurfacing. Existing concrete curbs and gutters and sidewalks that are deficient shall be removed and replaced as required. Attachment # 3 to Report #ENG 09-21 - 264 - Project Area No. 3 – Aspen Road Aspen Road – from New Street to 150m north of Pebble Court. The proposed work includes asphalt resurfacing. Existing concrete curbs and gutters and sidewalks that are deficient shall be removed and replaced as required. Project Area No. 4 – Pickering Parkway Pickering Parkway – from Dreyber Court to Brock Road (Regional Road #1). The proposed work includes asphalt resurfacing. Existing concrete curbs and gutters and sidewalks that are deficient shall be removed and replaced as required. - 265 - Project Area No. 5 – Rambleberry Avenue Rambleberry Avenue – from Kelvinway Lane to Rambleberry Avenue. The proposed work includes asphalt resurfacing. Existing concrete curbs and gutters and sidewalks that are deficient shall be removed and replaced as required. Project Area No. 6 – Liverpool Road Liverpool Road – from Tatra Drive to Bayly Street. The proposed work includes asphalt resurfacing. Existing concrete curbs and gutters and sidewalks that are deficient shall be removed and replaced as required. - 266 - Project Area No. 7 – Dunbarton Road Dunbarton Road – from 20m west of Cloudberry to Dixie Road. The proposed work includes asphalt resurfacing. Existing concrete curbs and gutters and sidewalks that are deficient shall be removed and replaced as required. Project Area No. 8 – Batory Avenue Batory Avenue – from Breezy Drive to Vistula Drive. The proposed work includes asphalt resurfacing. All existing concrete barrier curbs shall be removed and replaced with new concrete curbs and gutters. - 267 - Project Area No. 9 – Grenoble Boulevard Grenoble Boulevard – from Naroch Boulevard to Fuschia Lane. The proposed work includes asphalt resurfacing. All existing concrete barrier curbs shall be removed and replaced with new concrete curbs and gutters. Project Area No. 10 – Deerbrook Drive Deerbrook Drive – from Glenanna Road to Silverthorn Square. The proposed work includes asphalt resurfacing. Existing concrete curbs and gutters and sidewalks that are deficient shall be removed and replaced as required. - 268 - Project Area No. 11 – Wellington Street Wellington Street – from Victoria Street to Lorn Street. The proposed work includes asphalt resurfacing. Project Area No. 12 – Lorn Street Lorn Street – from Wellington Street to Central Street (Regional Road #5). The proposed work includes asphalt resurfacing. - 269 - Project Area No. 13 – Barber Street Barber Street – from Central Street to the north terminus. The proposed work include a final lift of asphalt and pavement markings. Project Area No. 14 – Sixth Concession Road Sixth Concession Road – from Greenwood Road to Westney Road. The proposed work include a final lift of asphalt and pavement markings. - 270 - Report to Council Report Number: ENG 10-21 Date: April 26, 2021 From: Richard Holborn Director, Engineering Services Subject: Balsdon Park Reconstruction - Tender No. T2021-7 - File: A-1440 Recommendation: 1. That Tender No. T2021-7 for Balsdon Park Reconstruction as submitted by Urgiles Bros. Excavating in the total tendered amount of $423,750.00 (HST included) be accepted; 2. That the total gross project cost of $548,050.00 (HST included), including the tendered amount, a contingency and other associated costs, and the total net project cost of $493,536.00 (net of HST rebate) be approved; 3. That Council authorize the Director, Finance & Treasurer to finance the net project cost in the amount of $493,536.00 as follows: a) the sum of $40,000.00 by a transfer from the Public Benefits Reserve Fund; b) the sum of $453,536.00 as approved in the 2021 Parks Capital Budget by a transfer from the Parkland Reserve Fund; and, 4. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. Executive Summary: Balsdon Park, which was originally constructed in the early 1960’s, was recognized as being underutilized and no longer adequately serviced the neighbourhood. For this reason, staff prepared a master plan for the park based on the comments received through a public consultation process between November 2017 and June 2018. The features of the proposed master plan included a lit pathway system, a shade structure and new children’s play area that would be visible from the park entrance, a leash-free area for dogs and general open space for informal play. The Balsdon Park Master Plan was endorsed by Council on December 2, 2019 (Report ENG 11-19, Resolution #189/19). As part of the 2021 Parks Capital Budget, funds were approved for the Balsdon Park Master Plan Implementation. Separate from Tender T-2021-7, Request for Quotation Q2021-30 for the Design, Supply and Installation of Playground Equipment was issued. Submissions have been received and are being evaluated by staff. Tender T2021-7 includes the balance of the site features approved in the park master plan. The costs for detailed park design including electrical engineering and geotechnical investigations were approved in the 2017 Parks Capital Budget as part of the park master plan process. - 271 - ENG 10-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Balsdon Park Reconstruction, Tender No. T2021-7 Page 2 Tender No. T2021-7 was issued on Thursday, March 11, 2021 and closed on Thursday, April 1, 2021 with 16 bidders responding. The low bid of $423,750.00 (HST included) submitted by Urgiles Bros. Excavating is recommended for approval. The total gross project cost which includes the tendered amount, a contingency and other associated costs, is estimated at $548,050.00 (HST included) and the total net project cost is estimated at $493,536.00 (net of HST rebate). A 12 percent contingency is included in the associated costs to cover any unforeseen costs such as poor soil conditions. Due to the ongoing concerns and new business practices related to the COVID-19 pandemic, Engineering Services and Corporate Services staff will work with Urgiles Bros. Excavating, to ensure that proper procedures and protocols are in place to provide a safe work environment for Pickering residents, the contractor, sub-contractors, and City staff. These measures may include a delay to the start date of the project. Financial Implications: 1. Tender Amount Tender No. T2021-7 $375,000.00 HST (13%) 48,750.00 Total $423,750.00 2. Estimated Project Costing Summary Tender No. T2021-7 – Tender for Balsdon Park Reconstruction $375,000.00 Associated Costs Playground Equipment Allowance (Q2021-30) Dog Off-leash Area Agility Component Allowance 40,000.00 20,000.00 Materials Testing Allowance 5,000.00 Project Contingency (12%) 45,000.00 Sub Total – Costs 485,000.00 HST (13%) 63,050.00 Total Gross Project Cost $548,050.00 HST Rebate (11.24%) (54,514.00) Total Net Project Cost $493,536.00 - 272 - ENG 10-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Balsdon Park Reconstruction, Tender No. T2021-7 Page 3 3. Approved Source of Funds – 2021 Parks Capital Budget Expense Code Source of Funds Budget Required 5780.2139.6129 RF – Third Party Contribution RF – Public Benefits RF – Parkland $40,000.00 0.00 460,000.00 $0.00 40,000.00 453,536.00 Total $500,000.00 $493,536.00 Net project costs (over) under approved funds $6,464.00 Note that the Third Party Contribution Reserve Fund being referenced in the approved 2021 Capital for this project are funds collected from developers related to density bonusing. These funds have been deposited in the Public Benefits Reserve Fund (account 7507), pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act. As reflected in Table 3 above, the draw for this component will be directly from the Public Benefits Reserve Fund. Discussion: Balsdon Park, located generally on the north east side of Liverpool Road and Krosno Boulevard was constructed in the early 1960’s. The park, although accessible by two entrances on Krosno Boulevard and one on Naroch Boulevard, is practically “land locked” and is not visible from the street. The existing baseball diamond is no longer programmed and the play structures that were vandalized due to their lack of visibility from the street many years ago were removed. In effort to revitalize the park, staff undertook the process to create a park master plan. A new park plan was developed based on comments received from area residents through an online survey and several open houses held in 2017 and 2018. The final Balsdon Park Master Plan was endorsed by Council on December 2, 2019 (Report ENG 11-19, Resolution #189/19). As part of the 2021 Parks Capital Budget, funds were approved for the Balsdon Park Reconstruction project. Tender No. T2021-7 includes the construction of the main features approved in the park master plan. A separate Request for Quotation for the Design, Supply and Installation of Playground Equipment was issued under Quotation No. Q2021-30. An allowance of $40,000.00 for this equipment has been included in the total net project cost. An allowance has also been included for the supply and installation of several dog agility components that are still to be selected. The costs for detailed park design including electrical engineering and geotechnical investigations were covered under the 2017 Parks Capital Budget as part of the park master plan process. - 273 - ENG 10-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Balsdon Park Reconstruction, Tender No. T2021-7 Page 4 The work to be completed in the Balsdon Park Reconstruction Project is the implementation of the park master plan and includes the following items: • removal of the existing baseball diamond backstop and infield area; • removal and replacement of the existing asphalt pathway running between Naroch Boulevard and the western Krosno Boulevard park entrance; • construction of a new asphalt path to connect the Naroch Boulevard park entrance and the eastern Krosno Boulevard park entrance; • replacement and expansion of the existing pathway lighting system with new poles and LED lights; • relocation of the children’s playground area to near the Naroch Boulevard park entrance; • construction of a dog off-leash area; • installation of pergola shade structures adjacent to the children’s playground area and in the dog off-leash area; • installation of new site furniture; and, • tree planting around the site. As part of the 2021 Parks Capital Budget, funds were approved for the Balsdon Park Reconstruction project. Tender No. T2021-7 was issued on Thursday, March 11, 2021 and closed on Thursday, April 1, 2021 with 16 bidders responding. The low bid submitted by Urgiles Bros. Excavating is recommended for approval. References for Urgiles Bros. Excavating and their Waste Management Plan have been reviewed and are deemed acceptable by the Manager, Landscape & Parks Development. The City’s Health & Safety Policy form and current Certificate of Clearance issued by the Workplace Safety & Insurance Board have been submitted by Urgiles Bros. Excavating. The Certificate of Insurance has been reviewed by the Manager, Budgets & Internal Audit and is deemed acceptable. In conjunction with staff’s review of the contractor’s references available on this project, the tender is deemed acceptable. Upon careful examination of all tenders and relevant documents received, the Engineering Services Department recommends the acceptance of the low bid submitted by Urgiles Bros. Excavating for Tender No. T2021-7 in the amount of $423,750.00 (HST included) and that the total net project cost of $493,536.00 (net of HST rebate) be approved. Attachments: 1. Supply & Services Memorandum dated April 8, 2021 2. Record of Tenders Opened 3. Location Map 4. Council Resolution #189/19 - 274 - ENG 10-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Balsdon Park Reconstruction, Tender No. T2021-7 Page 5 Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: Arnold Mostert, OALA Richard Holborn, P.Eng. Manager, Landscape & Parks Development Director, Engineering Services Stan Karwowski, MBA, CPA, CMA Director, Finance & Treasurer Ray Rodrigues, CPPB Manager, Supply & Services AM:mjh Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Marisa Carpino, M.A. Chief Administrative Officer Original signed by:Original signed by: Original signed by: Original signed by: Original signed by: - 275 - To: Richard Holborn Director, Engineering Services April 8, 2021 From: Lisa Chang Buyer, Supply & Services Copy: Administrative Assistant, Engineering Services Manager, Supply & Services Sr. Coordinator, Landscape & Parks Development Subject: Tender No. T2021-7 Tender for Balsdon Park Reconstruction Closed: Thursday, April 1, 2021 – 2:00pm File: F-5400-001 Tender No. T2021-7 was advertised on the City’s website on March 11, 2021. Sixteen companies have submitted a bid for this project. CSL Group Ltd. is rejected in accordance with Purchasing Policy item 23.02.11. A copy of the Record of Tenders Opened and Checked used at the public tender opening is attached. Tenders shall be irrevocable for 60 days after the official closing date and time. Purchasing Procedure No. PUR 010-001, Item 13.03 (r) provides checking tendered unit prices and extensions unit prices shall govern and extensions will be corrected accordingly, which has been completed by S&S and Urgiles Brothers Excavating Inc. is the compliant low bid at a value of $375,000 (HST Excluded) The unsuccessful Bidder’s tendering deposit, other than a bid bond, shall be returned to the applicable bidders as provided for by Purchasing Procedure No. PUR 010-001, Item 13.03 (w). Three (3) bids have been retained for review at this time and are attached. Pursuant to Information to Bidders Item 26 Pre-Condition of Award and Item 20 Tendering Specifications, the following documentation will be requested of Urgiles Brothers Excavating Inc. for your review during the evaluation stage of this tender call. Please advise if Supply & Services is to proceed with collecting the following documentation: (a)A copy of the City’s Health and Safety Policy form currently dated and signed; (b)A copy of the current Clearance Certificate issued by Workplace Safety & Insurance Board; (c)The City’s certificate of insurance or approved alternative form completed by the Bidder’s agent, broker or insurer; and (d)Waste Management Plan. Memo Attachment #1 to Report # ENG 10-21 - 276 - Page 2 A budget of $450,000 was provided to Supply & Services for this procurement. If the recommendation to award exceeds the budgeted amount, refer to Financial Control Policy Item 11 for additional instructions. In accordance with Purchasing Policy Item 06.04, the authority for the dollar limit as set out below excludes HST. As such, in accordance with Purchasing Policy Item 06.11, where the compliant quotation or tender meeting specifications and offering best value to the City is acceptable or where the highest scoring proposal is recommended and the estimated total purchase price is: (c) Over $250,000, the Manager may approve the award, subject to the approval of the Director, Treasurer, CAO and Council. Please include the following items in your report: 1. if Items (a) through (b) noted above are acceptable to the Co-ordinator, Health & Safety or designate, if required; 2. if Item (c) is acceptable to the Manager, Budgets & Internal Audit; 3. if the list of subcontractors is acceptable to Engineering Services; 4. if Item (d) is acceptable to Engineering Services; 5. any past work experience with low bidder Urgiles Brothers Excavating Inc. including work location; 6. without past work experience, if reference information is acceptable to Engineering Services; 7. the appropriate account number(s) to which this work is to be charged; 8. the budget amount(s) assigned thereto; 9. Treasurer’s confirmation of funding; 10. related departmental approvals; and 11. related comments specific to the project. After receiving Council’s approval, an approved “on-line” requisition will be required to proceed. Enquiries can be directed to the City’s website for the unofficial bid results as read out at the public tender opening or to Supply & Services. Bidders will be advised of the outcome in due course. If you require further information, please feel free to contact me or a member of Supply & Services. lc - 277 - City of Pickering Record of Tenders Opened and Checked Tender Description: Balsdon Park Reconstruction Tender No.: T2021-7 Date: April 1, 2021 - 2:00 pm Local Time Bidder Name Total Tendered Amount (HST Excluded) Comments Real Landscaping Plus Inc. $421 594.96 Latitude 67 Ltd. $445 584.00 Landco Group $474 750.60 CSL Group $431 888.50 dpsl Group Ltd. $469 000.00 Tri Son Contracting Inc. $506 478.20 Royalcrest Paving $472 532.97 Bond Paving & Construction $469 100.00 Forest Ridge Landscaping $425,003.00 Urgiles Bros. Excavating $375 000.00 Attachment #2 to Report # ENG 10-21 - 278 - Pine Valley Corporation $430 533.00 Gray’s Landcaping & Snow Removal $404 217.57 Canada Construction Limited $468 992.00 Buildscapes Construction Ltd. $462 004.36 Dukon Construction Ltd. $499 981.40 VERLY Construction Group $544 266.46 City Staff Present Other ___________________ _____________________ _____________________ ________________ The information is strictly preliminary, pending review and verification of conformance to terms, conditions and specifications. - 279 - !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!MODLIN ROADLIVERPOOL ROADKROSNO BOULEVARD NAROCH BOULEVARD BEM AVENUEFOXGLOVE AVENUE GRENOBLE BOULEVARDANTONIO STREETLUNA COURT HELEN CRESCENTANNLAND STREETBRIXTO N L A N E SCALE: Engineering Services Department Balsdon Park Location MapMar. 30, 2021 DATE: q Balsdon Park 1:2,500 Path: L:\MPandE\Asset Management - GIS\EPW GIS\01 Maps\LocationMaps\LocationMaps.aprx Attachment #3 to Report #ENG 10-21 - 280 - Legislative Services Division Clerk’s Office Directive Memorandum December 23, 2019 To: Richard Holborn Director, Engineering Services From: Susan Cassel City Clerk Subject: Direction as per Minutes of the Meeting of City Council held on December 16, 2019 Director, Engineering Services, Report ENG 11-19 Balsdon Park Master Plan Council Decision Resolution #189/19 1. That Balsdon Park Master Plan be endorsed by Council; 2. That staff be directed to prepare the detailed designs required for the implementation of the Balsdon Park Master Plan; 3. That staff be directed to include the implementation of the Balsdon Park Master Plan in the 2021 Capital Budget; and, 4. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. Please take any action deemed necessary. Susan Cassel Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Director, Finance & Treasurer Attachment #4 to Report # ENG 10-21 - 281 - Report to Council Report Number: FIN 06-21 Date: April 26, 2021 From: Stan Karwowski Director, Finance & Treasurer Subject: 2021 Tax Rates and Final Tax Due Dates - File: F-4200-001 Recommendation: 1. That Report FIN 06-21 of the Director, Finance & Treasurer regarding the 2021 tax rates be received; 2. That the 2021 tax rates for the City of Pickering be approved as contained in Schedule “A” of the By-law attached hereto; 3. That the tax levy due dates for the Final Billing be June 28, 2021 and September 28, 2021 excluding the industrial, multi-residential and commercial realty tax classes; 4. That the attached By-law be approved; 5. That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to make any changes or undertake any actions necessary to comply with Provincial regulations including altering due dates or final tax rates to ensure that the property tax billing process is completed; and 6. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary actions to give effect thereto. Executive Summary: Adoption of the above Recommendations and the attached By-law provides for the approval of tax rates required to raise the levy approved in the 2021 Current Budget of the City of Pickering and to levy taxes for School Boards and for the Region of Durham. They also set the property tax final due dates for residential property classes. The final due dates for non-residential (commercial, industrial, etc.) tax classes will be set later this year. Financial Implications: Adoption of the Recommendations and enacting the By-law will allow the City to bill the Final 2021 levy for all properties except for the industrial, commercial and multi-residential tax classes, which will be dealt with later this year. Passing of the By-law will assist the City of Pickering in meeting its financial obligations and reducing any borrowing costs. This levy also raises taxes for the Region of Durham and the School Boards. - 282 - FIN 06-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: 2021 Tax Rates and Final Tax Due Dates Page 2 ______________________________________________________________________ Discussion: The 2021 final tax billing process will consist of two separate components: 1. Residential and residential-related (farm, managed forest) properties; and, 2. Commercial, industrial, and multi-residential realty classes. Later this year, a report will be presented to Council asking for Council’s approval to bill the non-residential tax classes. The non-residential tax classes are subject to tax capping and Pickering’s staff, in conjunction with the other lower tier municipal tax staff and the Region’s finance staff, will be working on the tax capping calculations during the next few months. City’s Net Tax Levy and Tax Rate Increase The City’s 2021 Budget provided for an average property tax increase of 1.45 per cent and was adopted by Council through Finance Department Report FIN 05-21. The 2021 Council approved a budget levy of $70,841,695 plus assessment growth of $2,037,000 which translates into a total property tax levy of $72,878,695. The Region’s tax increase for Pickering is 1.98 per cent and the School Board increase is zero, resulting in a total average residential increase of approximately 1.54 per cent. The property tax rates are calculated based on the budgets of both Pickering and Durham Region. The tax rate itself is defined under section 306 of the Municipal Act and it is to be calculated to eight decimal points. Tax Due Date Instalments Recommendation 3 sets the due dates for the payment of residential taxes at June 28, 2021 and September 28, 2021. Property Tax Deferral Program Update The Property Tax Section, with Council approval (FIN 02-21) implemented a property tax deferral program. The program allowed residential property owners the ability to pay the regular tax payments for February 2021 and April 2021 by the end of May 2021. This is a 90 day deferral for the first payment and a 30 day d eferral for the second payment. For the past two months, the program has been promoted in the local newspaper, social media channels, local billboards, brochures, arrears notice and our website. At the time of writing this report, there have been 24 applications submitted and all 24 applications have been approved (which is a 100 percent acceptance rate). Last year, the City provided a two month property tax deferral as it related to the April instalment. This year’s program provided a more focused approach whereby those in need received the financial assistance and the deferral period was longer. Another positive aspect regarding this year’s program is that Pickering has now developed a website based property tax deferral program that can adopted and or modified for any future need. In - 283 - FIN 06-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: 2021 Tax Rates and Final Tax Due Dates Page 3 ______________________________________________________________________ other words, we have a new time tested financial tool in our tool box to provide financial assistance if and when the need arises. Communication Strategy In addition to mailing the tax bills, the City will advertise the tax instalment due dates on the City’s webpage, the Pickering News Advertiser and any other communication channels deemed appropriate by the Director, Finance & Treasurer, prior to each tax due date. Other Recommendations 2 and 3 provide for the levying of all tax rates on all classes of property, except for the non-residential properties. For non-residential properties, the property taxes will be billed at a later date because the “claw back” percentages have not yet been determined. Staff will bring a separate report to Council for the non-residential billing later this year. Staff’s preliminary estimate for the final non -residential tax due date is for the end of September. Attachments: 1.By-law to Establish the 2021 Tax Rates for All Realty Classes and Final Instalment Due Dates for All Residential Realty Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: Original Signed By: Original Signed By: Mike Jones Stan Karwowski Supervisor, Taxation Director, Finance & Taxation Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Marisa Carpino, M.A. Chief Administrative Officer Original Signed By: - 284 - Attachment #1 to Report #FIN 06-21 The Corporation of the City of Pickering By-law No. 7836/21 Being a by-law to adopt the estimates of all sums required to be raised by taxation for the year 2021 and to establish the Tax Rates necessary to raise such sums and to establish the final due dat es for the residential, pipeline, farm, and managed forest realty tax classes. Whereas it is necessary for the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering, pursuant to the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c25, as amended, to pass a By-law to levy a separate tax rate on the assessment in each property class; and, Whereas the property classes have been prescribed by the Minister of Finance under the Assessment Act, R.S.O. 1990, ch.A.31, as amended and its Regulations; and, Whereas it is necessary for the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering, pursuant to the Municipal Act, to levy on the whole ratable property according to the last revised assessment roll for The Corporation of the City of Pickering the sums set forth for various purposes in Schedule “A”, for the current year; and, Whereas the Regional Municipality of Durham has passed By-law 07-2021 to establish tax ratios, By-law 09-2021 to adopt estimates of all sums required by The Regional Municipality of Durham for the Durham Region Transit Commission, By-law 10-2021 to set and levy rates of taxation for Regional Solid Waste Management, and By-law 08- 2021 to set and levy rates of taxation for Regional General Purposes and set tax rates on Area Municipalities; and, Whereas the Province of Ontario has provided the 2021 education tax rates for the realty classes; and, Whereas sub section 342(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c25, as amended, permits the issuance of separate tax bills for separate classes of real property for 2021; and, Whereas an interim levy was made by the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering (pursuant to By-law 7792/20 before the adoption of the estimates for the current year); Now therefore the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as follows: 1.For the year 2021, The Corporation of the City of Pickering (the “City”) on March 22, 2021 approved Council Report FIN 05-21 and corresponding schedules and attachments as presented, resulting in a taxation levy of $72,878,695. - 285 - By-law No.7836/21 Page 2 2.For the year 2021, the City shall levy upon the Property Classes set out in Schedule “A”, the rates of taxation as set out in Schedule “A”, for the City of Pickering, the Region of Durham and for Education purposes on the current value assessment as also set out in Schedule “A”. Where applicable, taxes shall be adjusted in accordance with Bill 140, as amended and its Regulations. 3.The levy provided for in Schedule “A” shall be reduced by the amount of the interim levy for 2021. 4.The Tax Levy due dates for the Final Billing be June 28, 2021 and September 28, 2021 for all classes excluding the non-residential tax classes (commercial, industrial, and multi-residential). 5.The Treasurer is hearby authorized to accept twelve monthly electronic payments commencing January 1st and ending December 1st inclusive. Failure by the taxpayer to pay any one monthly part payment, will invoke the late payment charges as outlined in the Municipal Act and confirmed by the City through By-law every year. 6.The Treasurer is hearby authorized to accept twelve monthly electronic payments commencing January 8th and ending December 8th inclusive. Failure by the taxpayer to pay any one monthly part payment, will invoke the late payment charges as outlined in the Municipal Act and confirmed by the City through By-law every year. 7.The Treasurer is hearby authorized to accept twelve monthly electronic payments commencing January 16th and ending December 16th inclusive. Failure by the taxpayer to pay any one monthly part payment, will invoke the late payment charges as outlined in the Municipal Act and confirmed by the City through By-law every year. 8.For the year 2021, the City shall levy upon designated Universities and Colleges an annual tax at the prescribed amount for each full-time student enrolled in the university or college, as determined by the Minister of Training, Colleges, and Universities, payable on or after July 1st in accordance with section 343 of the Municipal Act. 9.If any section or portion of this By-law or of Schedule “A” is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, it is the intent of Council for The Corporation of the City of Pickering that all remaining sections and portions of this By-law and of Schedule “A” continue in force and effect. 10.This By-law comes into force on the date it is passed. - 286 - By-law No. 7836/21 Page 3 By-law passed this 26th day of April, 2021. ______________________________ Dave Ryan, Mayor ______________________________ Susan Cassel, City Clerk - 287 - Report to Council Report Number: FIR 02-21 Date: April 26, 2021 From: John Hagg Fire Chief Subject: Supply and Delivery of a Fire Pumper Rescue Replacement -Quotation No. Q2020-5 -File: A-1440-001-21 Recommendation: 1.That RFQ No. Q2020-5 submitted by Safetek for the Supply and Delivery of a Fire Pumper Rescue Replacement project in the amount of $1,045,551.00 (HST included) be accepted; 2.That the total gross project cost of $1,109,961.00 (HST included) and the total net project cost of $999,554.00 (net of HST rebate) be approved; 3.That the Director, Finance & Treasurer be authorized to finance the total net project cost in the amount of $999,554.00 as follows: a)the sum of $990,000.00 be financed by the issue of debentures by The Regional Municipality of Durham over a period not to exceed 15 years; b)the sum of $9,554.00 be funded from property taxes; c)the annual repayment charges in the amount of approximately $87,500.00 be included in the annual Current Budget for the City of Pickering commencing 2021, or such subsequent year in which the debentures are issued, and continuing thereafter until the debenture financing is repaid; d)the Treasurer be authorized to make any changes, adjustments, and revisions to amounts, terms, conditions, or take any actions necessary in order to effect the foregoing; 4.That the draft by-law attached to this report be enacted; and 5.That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. Executive Summary: As approved in the 2020 Capital Budget, the Fire Services Department will require one pumper rescue apparatus to replace one pumper rescue apparatus currently in service. For the purpose of supplying this apparatus, Quotation No. Q2020-5 was prepared and advertised on the City’s website on January 27, 2021. The closing date was extended to March 3, 2021 due to specification changes. - 288 - FIR 02-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Supply and Delivery of a Fire Pumper Rescue Replacement Page 2 The Evaluation Committee scored the quotations and established Safetek as the highest ranking Respondent. The total gross project cost is estimated to be $1,109,961.00 (HST included) and the total net project cost is estimated at $999,554.00 (net of HST rebate). Financial Implications: 1. Quotation Amount Quotation No. Q2020-5 $925,266.00 HST (13%) 120,285.00 Total Gross Quotation Cost $1,045,551.00 2. Estimated Project Costing Summary Quotation No. Q2020-5 $925,266.00 Tools and Equipment (5340.2003.6178) Contingency Sub Total Cost 50,000.00 7,000.00 $982,266.00 HST (13%) 127,695.00 Total Gross Project Cost $1,109,961.00 HST Rebate (11.24%) (110, 407.00) Total Net Project Cost $999,554.00 3. Approved Source of Funds 2020 Fire Services Capital Budget Description Supply and Delivery of a Fire Pumper Rescue Replacement Expense Code 5340.2003.6159 5340.2003.6178 5340.2003.6159 Source of Funds Debt – 15 Years Subtotal – Debt 15 Years Property Taxes Total Funds Budget $825,000.00 175,000.00 $1,000,000.00 0.00 $1,000,000.00 Required $939,120.00 50,880.00 $990,000.00 9,554.00 $999,554.00 Project Cost under/(over) approved funds by $446.00 - 289 - FIR 02-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Supply and Delivery of a Fire Pumper Rescue Replacement Page 3 This apparatus will require necessary tools and equipment that will require custom mounting and fitting in order to ready it for service. A portion of the funds will be required for the purchase and installation of this equipment. Discussion: This pumper rescue apparatus, as approved in the 2020 Capital Budget and bid under Q2020-5, will be primarily utilized to respond to emergency incidents throughout the City that include structure fires, automobile accidents, medical emergencies, industrial alarms, and specialized rescues. It is designed to be highly maneuverable, carry 1900 liters of water, and has a pump capacity rating of 7,000 liters per minute. The estimated time to have this apparatus built and in-service is 18 months after the successful respondent is awarded. This time allows Pickering Fire Services’ and Operations staff to carefully oversee the construction of the apparatus and ensure it is fully operational before it is deemed ready for service. This includes installing any additional tool mounts and equipment mounts not included in the purchasing contract, and training Operations and Fire Services staff on the apparatus’ maintenance and use. When the apparatus is ready for service it will be added to the Pickering Fire Services vehicle fleet. It will replace City vehicle 532, the 2005 Smeal pumper rescue apparatus which is past it’s 15 year service life and is overdue for replacement. Major tools and equipment required for purchase include Hurst eDraulic rescue tools, fire hose, nozzles, and a thermal imaging camera. Specifications for this apparatus were developed based on consultation with Purchasing staff, City Operations staff, the Fire Services Joint Health and Safety Committee, and Training Division staff. Submissions have been received to the quotation call, which closed on March 3, 2021 with two respondents submitting quotations for this project. Fire Services staff have reviewed the previous work experience of Safetek, the references provided and the bid is deemed acceptable. Upon careful examination of all quotations and relevant documents received, the Fire Services Department recommends the acceptance of the RFQ submitted by Safetek for RFQ No. Q2020-5 in the amount of $1,045,551.00 (HST included) and that the total net project cost of $999,554.00 be approved. Attachments: 1. Supply & Services Summary Memorandum dated March 22, 2021 2. Draft By-law for the Supply and Delivery of a Fire Pumper Rescue Replacement project - 290 - FIR 02-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Supply and Delivery of a Fire Pumper Rescue Replacement Page 4 Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: Jason Yoshida Ray Rodrigues, CPPB Deputy Fire Chief Manager, Supply & Services Caryn Kong, CPA, CGA John Hagg Senior Financial Analyst-Capital Fire Chief & Debt Management Stan Karwowski, MBA, CPA, CMA Director, Finance & Treasurer JY:jm Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Marisa Carpino, M.A. Interim Chief Administrative Officer Original Signed By: Original Signed By: Original Signed By: Original Signed By: Original Signed By: Original Signed By: - 291 - To: John Hagg Director, Fire Services March 22, 2021 From: Lisa Chang Buyer, Supply & Services Copy: Administrative Assistant, Fire Services Deputy Fire Chief Manager, Supply & Services Subject: Quotation No. Q2020-5 Fire Pumper Rescue Replacement Closing Date: March 9, 2021 at 12:00 Noon. File: F-5300-001 Quotation Q2020-5 was advertised on the City’s website on January 27, 2021 of which two companies have responded. Stage I – Mandatory Submission Requirements – determines which submissions satisfy all the mandatory submission requirements and provides Respondents the opportunity to rectify deficiencies, which was not required for this RFQ. Two quotations proceeded to Stage II – Evaluation. The City conducted negotiations with Safetek Emergency Vehicles Ltd. in accordance with Part 2 – Evaluations, item 3.6 Safetek Emergency Vehicles Ltd. is the top ranked respondent with a submitted price of $925,266 (HST Excluded). A budget of $1,000,000 was provided to Supply & Services for this procurement. If the recommendation to award exceeds the budgeted amount, refer to Financial Control Policy Item 11 for additional instructions. In accordance with Appendix D – Request for Quotations Particulars, Item B: Material Disclosures, the following documents will be requested from Safetek Emergency Vehicles Ltd. (a)A copy of the City’s Health and Safety Policy form currently dated and signed; (b)A copy of the current Clearance Certificate issued by Workplace Safety & Insurance Board; and (c)The City’s certificate of insurance or approved alternative form shall be completed by the bidder’s agent, broker or insurer. Please advise if Supply & Services is to proceed with this task. In accordance with Purchasing Policy Item 06.04, the authority for the dollar limit as set out below excludes HST. Memo Attachment #1 to Report FIR 02-21 - 292 - Page 2 of 2 In accordance with Purchasing Policy, Item 06.11, where the compliant quotation or tender meeting specifications and offering best value to the City is acceptable or where the highest scoring proposal is recommended and the estimated total purchase price is: (c) Over $250,000, the Manager may approve the award, subject to the approval of the Director, Treasurer, CAO and Council. Subject to receipt of approvals on Health & Safety and insurance documents, please provide your recommendation in report form. After receiving Council’s approval, an approved “on-line” requisition will be required to proceed. Please direct all enquiries to Supply & Services. Respondents will be advised in due course. If you require further information or assistance, do not hesitate to contact me or a member of Supply & Services. RR/lc - 293 - The Corporation of the City of Pickering By-law No. 7837/21 Being a by-law to authorize the Supply and Delivery of a Fire Pumper Rescue Replacement project in the City of Pickering and the issuance of debentures in the amount of $990,000.00. Whereas Section 11 of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, provides that a lower-tier municipality may pass by-laws respecting matters within the spheres of jurisdiction described in that Section; and, Whereas Subsection 401(1) of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, provides that a municipality may incur a debt for municipal purposes, whether by borrowing money or in any other way; and, Whereas Subsection 401(3) of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, provides that a lower-tier municipality in a regional municipality does not have the power to issue debentures; and, Whereas The Regional Municipality of Durham has the sole authority to issue debentures for the purposes of its lower-tier municipalities including The Corporation of the City of Pickering (the “City”); and, Whereas the Council of the City wishes to proceed with debenture financing for the Supply and Delivery of a Fire Pumper Rescue Replacement project; and, Whereas before authorizing the Supply and Delivery of a Fire Pumper Rescue Replacement project, the Council of the City had the Treasurer update the City’s Annual Repayment Limit, the Treasurer calculated the estimated annual amount payable in respect of such project and determined that such annual amount would not cause the City to exceed the updated limit and therefore, Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) approval is not required as per Section 401 of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, and the regulations made thereunder; And whereas after determining that Local Planning Appeal Tribunal approval is not required, the Council of the City approved report FIR 02-21 on the date hereof and approved the Supply and Delivery of a Fire Pumper Rescue Replacement project in the City of Pickering; Attachment #2 to Report FIR 02-21 - 294 - By-law No. 7837/21 Page 2 Now therefore the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as follows: 1.That the City proceed with the project referred to as “Supply and Delivery of a Fire Pumper Rescue Replacement”; 2.That the estimated costs of the project in the amount of $999,554.00 be financed as follows: a). the sum of $990,000.00 be financed by the issue of debentures by The Regional Municipality of Durham over a period not to exceed 15 years; b). the sum of $9,554.00 be funded from property taxes; c). and such financing arrangements are hereby authorize; 3.That the funds to repay the principal and interest of the debentures be provided for in the annual Current Budget for the City commencing in 2021 or such subsequent year in which the debentures are issued and continuing thereafter until the debenture financing is repaid; By-law passed this 26th day of April, 2021 ___________________________________ Dave Ryan, Mayor ___________________________________ Susan Cassel, City Clerk - 295 - Report to Council Report Number: PLN 20-21 Date: April 26, 2021 From: Kyle Bentley Director, City Development & CBO Subject: Lease Agreement for Temporary Use of City Property at 3800 Sideline 32 - William F. White International Inc. – Filming Backlot - File: S-4240 Recommendation: 1. That Report PLN 20-21 from the Director, City Development & CBO regarding a Lease Agreement for Temporary Use of City Property at 3800 Sideline 32 be received for information; 2. That the City of Pickering enter into a Lease Agreement with William F. White International Inc., for the period October 1, 2021 to December 31, 2026, with the option to renew the lease for 2 additional terms of 2 years each; 3. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Lease Agreement between the City of Pickering and William F. White International Inc. in substantially the form as attached to this report, subject to revisions as may be acceptable to the City Solicitor and the Director, City Development & CBO; and 4. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. Executive Summary: On December 7, 2020, Council gave approval for the City to enter into a lease agreement with a television production company, for temporary use of vacant, City owned lands located at 3800 Sideline 32. This agreement provides for the temporary use of the property to develop a filming backlot for exclusive use by that television production, with an initial term ending on September 30, 2021, and an option to renew the lease for a 2nd year, from October 1, 2021 to September 30, 2022. The current television production will continue to undertake their filming activities on the backlot until the end of the first year of their lease on September 30, 2021. However, the production company has now entered into negotiations with William F. White International Inc. (“WFW ”) for the sale of all tangible assets and temporary built form in place on the filming backlot. In turn, WFW has expressed their interest in entering into a lease agreement with the City of Pickering commencing October 1, 2021, for the purpose of managing the filming backlot for an extended period of time. WFW would continue to provide production services to the current television production, and then for other productions, until such time as the City begins implementing its plan to develop a District Park at this site. - 296 - Report PLN 20-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Temporary Filming Backlot – 3800 Sideline 32 Page 2 For this reason, the duration of the proposed lease agreement with WFW (see Lease Agreement, Appendix I), is from October 1, 2021 to December 31, 2026, with an option of 2 further renewal terms of 2 years each, providing for a potential termination date of December 31, 2030. The lease agreement would provide WFW exclusive use of the lands, for management of a filming backlot, providing service to various filming projects, as may be contracted for by WFW over the course of the term of the lease. Despite the various productions, WFW will remain the primary on-site service provider on the backlot. The City’s Director, Engineering Services has confirmed that the timing and ability to develop the site as a District Park would not be affected by either the length of time proposed by this new lease term, or the anticipated activities of this temporary filming backlot. A lease rate has been set at $30,000.00 per month +HST, payable from the commencement of the lease on October 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022. Thereafter the lease rate would be subject to an annual increase of 2 percent +HST of the annual rent of the previous year, for each successive year of the lease. Purchase of the current backlot assets and built form represents a significant investment by WFW. Should the City not enter into an agreement with WFW for use of our lands, the assets and built form would be relocated to another site by WFW. Further, the current tenant would forgo their option to renew for a 2nd year and the lands would be restored to a fallow field condition at the end of the current term of the lease in the fall of 2021. WFW is a Canadian based company with nearly 60 years of expertise in supporting the film and television industry. As a wholly owned subsidiary of Ashtead Group, trading in Canada as Sunbelt Rentals, WFW is deeply rooted in the fast growing, domestic and international media industry. WFW holds assets across Canada in Vancouver, Calgary, Mississauga, and Toronto, including the operation of over a million square feet of production space. They are a highly sought after and respected media partner, working closely with academia and trade unions to ensure the sustained, healthy growth of the Canadian film and television industry. Extending a lease to WFW aligns with the City of Pickering’s vision to increase investment and activities in our Creative Economy, while protecting these lands for future community uses. Financial Implications: William F. White International Inc. will be responsible for all costs associated with this contract, or incurred to build out, operate and maintain the temporary film backlot, including any new utility installations, or entrance works required by the City of Pickering. The City will collect revenues in the amount of $30,000.00 +HST per month, from the commencement of the term on October 1, 2021 until December 31, 2022, and thereafter with an annual increase in fees of 2 percent on the previous year, applied at the start of each remaining year of the contract. - 297 - Report PLN 20-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Temporary Filming Backlot – 3800 Sideline 32 Page 3 Discussion: Supporting the Growth of our Creative Economy The City’s Cultural Strategic Plan gives clear direction to engage in opportunities that strengthen culture-led economic growth in our community. Extending the temporary use of the lands at 3800 Sideline 32 introduces a new opportunity to work with media industry leaders, and make sustainable, long-term connections to creative industry builders. William F. White International Inc.: A P roven Partner in Media Industry Development Founded in 1963, William F. White International Inc. (WFW) is a Canadian company, and is currently held as Canada's most iconic provider of production equipment to the entertainment industry. With offices across the country, including Vancouver, Calgary, Mississauga, and Toronto, the company services productions of all sizes and stages of development from coast to coast, and houses an extensive inventory of state of the art equipment. WFW is owned by the Ashtead Group through their wholly owned subsidiary, trading as Sunbelt Rentals. The WFW group includes Whites Studios, Whites Camera, Whites Lighting & Grip, Whites Location Equipment Supply, and Whites Specialty Equipment. WFW’s family of assets currently include 9 studios totaling over a million square feet of production space nation-wide. The latest studio space includes the Century Studio in Mississauga that opened in July of 2020, (WFW’s 3rd Mississauga location). “Fortress” will be their 10th production facility and training space, and is currently under development as WFW’s newest Calgary facility. WFW brings with it a depth of expertise and innovation, critical to the support and growth of the Canadian film and media industry. Together, with Sunbelt Rentals and the Ashtead Group, they also provide a significant depth of access to global media industry stakeholders. Sustainability and Community Engagement Strategies Cornerstones of the WFW business model include the implementation of sustainable business practices and innovative green technology, and the provision of industry training and development through partnerships with local academia and trade unions. Section 10.e. of the draft Lease Agreement (see Draft Lease Agreement, Appendix I) calls for the submission of an Annual Sustainability Plan to address the management of the Pickering backlot, including, but not limited to, the implementation of energy conservation measures, responsible management and diversion of waste streams, site cleanliness to avoid litter, and green fleet practices. Section 11 of the draft Lease Agreement calls for WFW to work with the City to investigate opportunities to engage our local academia and performing arts community, for the purpose of providing on-site training, mentorship programs, or other initiatives related to development of the local film and creative arts community. - 298 - Report PLN 20-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Temporary Filming Backlot – 3800 Sideline 32 Page 4 WFW has responded by providing an overview of how they plan to address sustainability practices and provide community engagement (see WFW Backlot ESG and Community Engagement, Attachment #1). Highlights of their overview include: • a corporate wide commitment to achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 in all operations; • implementation of circular waste management strategy including re-use/donation of built form and construction waste (e.g., Habitat for Humanity); food donations to support local food banks and community outreach organizations; • reviewing the feasibility of installing an on-site solar array to reduce dependence on diesel generators; • local access to WFW’s National Grants program for Indigenous and local film makers; and • engaging local post-secondary institutions to provide access to WFW internships, mentorship programs and a college tuition program. Proposed Use of the Lands The draft Lease Agreement with WFW was built on the terms previously executed with the current tenant. In addition, WFW have asked for permission to install perimeter fencing at their cost, to provide added security and reduce potential liabilities on the site. The current built form will remain but may undergo re-facing or re-design, to suit the needs of the various productions under contract with WFW during the course of the Term. There are excess grounds on the site that may be suitable for further temporary build out. All areas requiring environmental protection have been identified by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and will continue to be protected. The City will continue to receive updated site plans and as-built drawings for the backlot for reference by both our Building Services Department and Pickering Fire Services. The future use of this site for a District Park is not affected by this temporary use as a filming backlot. Restoration of the site at the end of the term to a fallow field, continues to be a condition of the use of the property. Lease Term The draft Lease Agreement provides for commencement of the term beginning October 1, 2021, inclusive until December 31, 2026, plus an option for 2 additional terms of 2 years each, and an absolute end date of December 31, 2030. As with the current tenant, while exclusive use of the lands would be granted to WFW for the sole purpose of filming activities, the City would retain access to the property, for the purpose of ensuring the safe and appropriate use of our lands as needed. - 299 - Report PLN 20-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Temporary Filming Backlot – 3800 Sideline 32 Page 5 Approvals and Permits All site works will continue to be reviewed and approved by: • City of Pickering, Engineering Services, to ensure compliance with City standards as they relate to grading, topsoil management and entrance works; • Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), to ensure the continued protection of areas identified as environmentally sensitive; and • Pickering Fire Services, to ensure emergency access and egress is maintained. All filming activities conducted on City roads will still require issuance of an approved City of Pickering Film Location Permit, together with the additional payment of the associated Film Location Permit fees. Notice must be provided to local residents and businesses regarding: • film activity, particularly filming scheduled between the hours of 9 pm and 7 am; • use of pyrotechnics, special effects that generate loud noises, use of special effects gunfire, or excessively bright lighting after 9 pm; and • storage or use of incendiary based special effects that may require a permit from Pickering Fire Services. Based on the details noted above, staff believe the temporary lease of the City lands at 3800 Sideline 32 to WFW to be a great opportunity to support the local film industry and to increase Pickering’s profile as a destination for filming activities. Accordingly, staff are pleased to recommend that the City enter into a Lease Agreement with WFW, for the period October 1, 2021 to December 31, 2026, with the option to renew the lease for 2 additional terms of 2 years each. Appendix: Appendix I Draft Lease Agreement Attachment: 1. WFW ESG and Community Engagement - 300 - Report PLN 20-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Temporary Filming Backlot – 3800 Sideline 32 Page 6 Prepared By: Catherine Hodge Senior Coordinator, Development Liaison Approved/Endorsed By: Kyle Bentley, P. Eng. Director, City Development & CBO CH:ld Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Marisa Carpino, M.A. Chief Administrative Officer - 301 - Appendix I to Report No. PLN 20-21 Draft Lease Agreement - 302 - 1 PPAB 6156377v7 LOCATION AGREEMENT 1. Premises and Uses: The Corporation of the City of Pickering (the “City”), for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby irrevocably grants to William F. White International Inc. (“User”), the exclusive use of both the real and personal property located at the premises legally described as follows: Part of Lots 33 and 34, Concession 6, being Part 4, Plan 40R -28722, City of Pickering (the “Premises”), together with access to and egress from the Premises for User’s and its Designees’ personnel, vehicles, and equipment, for the purposes of (a) erecting, maintaining, using and removing temporary sets and structures, (b) storing equipment, (c) photographing and filming the Premises, including any and all portions thereof (including, without limitation, the interior and exterior designs of the Premises, sets, structures and furniture items), (d) recording sound in connection with any such filming, and (e) any uses or purposes related or incidental to any of the foregoing (collectively, the “Uses”). The Premises is being delivered to the User on an “as is” basis and the User acknowledges having examined the Premises and being satisfied therewith. “Designees” shall mean any and all licensees, designees and other parties (including production companies) authorized by User from time to time to engage in all or any of the Uses on the Premises. User shall have the right to install, at the User’s sole cost and expense, one or more fences and gates on and around the Premises in such locations as deemed necessary by User. User shall also have the right to install and extend electrical, solar and other alternative energy lines and facilities from any adjacent right-of-way into, on, through and under the Premises in such locations as U ser may deem necessary, and the City shall diligently and in good faith cooperate with the User in connection therewith. 2. Additional Uses: The parking of production vehicles on any municipal road or use of any City facility not located on the Premises is subject to separate City permissions and associated fees. The User acknowledges that this Location Agreement does not create a real property interest in the Premises as a result of or connected in any way with the use of the Premises granted herein. The User agree that the use of the Premises pursuant to this Location Agreement shall be solely for the Uses. There shall be no further uses granted by the City to the User and permitted by this Location Agreement without the prior written consent of the City, which consent may be withheld by the City in its sole discretion. Use of the City property for filming activities outside of the Premises is subject to separate approvals, permits and associated fees. The City reserves the right to enter onto the Premises f or municipal purposes, subject to the City providing User with prior written notice and subject further that such entry shall cause no material interference to the Uses or to the activities or use of the Premises pursuant to this Location Agreement. 3. Use and Rights: User and its Designees shall have the right to photograph, record and use in any manner whatsoever any names connected with the Premises and any names, insignias, artwork, and signs located thereon and any logos, trademarks, service marks, trade dress and verbiage contained on such signs in connection with or as part of the Uses and the right to refer to the Premises by any real or fictitious name and the right to attribute any real or fictitious events as having occurred on the Premises. User and its Designees shall have the right to reproduce, exhibit, advertise, and exploit and license others to reproduce, exhibit, advertise, and exploit all of the photographs and recordings made hereunder in connection with the Uses or any matter related thereto, in any and all media, versions and forms, now known and hereafter devised, throughout the universe, in all languages, in perpetuity, and in any ancillary exploitation thereof, including, without limitation, publications, partnership marketing campaigns, soundtracks and merchandising, and in connection with any publicity and advertising, and promotion, marketing and advertising of exhibitor’s products and/or services, and including, without limitation, the right to use or authorize the use of any photographs and recordings made hereunder in other motion pictures. User and its Designees shall have the right, in their sole discretion, to alter or edit the photographs and recordings of the Premises (and any names, insignias, artwork, and signs located thereon and any logos, trademarks, service marks, trade dress and verbiage contained on such signs) in connection with any of the Uses and in any ancillary exploitation thereof. No credit need be accorded to the City in connection with any use of the Premises and/or Duplicates (as defined below). The User or its applicable Designee shall notify the City of any use of stunts, gun fire, pyrotechnics, SPFX, loud noises or filming after 11:00 pm and obtain any applicable permits as may be required. Further, the User or its applicable Designee shall make good faith reasonable efforts to notify all adjacent land owners of the occurrence of such activities on the Premises at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the occurrence of such activities. For clarity, User shall own all sets, structures and other material and equipment located on the Premises and built/brought in by User in connection with the Uses. 4. Representation and Warranties: The City represents and warrants that the City is the registered owner of the Premises, that the City is fully authorized to enter into this location agreement (“Location Agreement”), - 303 - 2 PPAB 6156377v7 that the City has the right to grant User and its Designees the right to enter and use the Premises and each and all of the rights granted herein and that no further permission or consent of any other person or entity is necessary for the City to grant User and its Designees the rights granted herein. Furthermore, the City represents and warrants that the City will take no action nor allow or permit or author ize any third party to take any action which might interfere with User’s and its Designees’ full use and quiet enjoyment of the Premises in accordance with the terms hereof; the City will maintain the Premises in useable condition for all Uses; and it is not necessary for User or any of its Designees to obtain the consent or permission of, or to pay any amounts to, any person, firm or corporation in order to enable User and its Designees to enjoy the full rights to the use of the Premises as described herein. The City also represents and warrants that the City shall not accept anything of value (except the payments payable hereunder) for promoting any product, service or company, or arranging for any person or product to appear, in any public media. 5. Term: User and its Designees may take possession of the Premises on the earlier of (i) October 1, 2021 or (ii) the date of the termination of the existing location agreement for the Premises between the City and Jack Reacher TV Productions Ltd. (the earlier of such dates being the “Commencement Date”) and may continue in possession until September 30, 2026 (the “Term”); provided that in the event that User is not in material uncured default of this Location Agreement (which default has continued for more than fift een (15) days from the date of User’s receipt of written notice thereof from the City), then User shall have the right, exercisable by written notice to the City no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the then -current Term of this Location Agreement, to extend the Term for two (2) consecutive renewal terms of two (2) years each (the “Renewal Terms”) on the same terms and conditions as set forth herein. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary contained in this Location Agreement, User shall have the right, in User’s sole discretion and at any time after September 30, 2024, to terminate this Location Agreement upon at least sixty (60) days’ prior written notice to the City, in which case this Location Agreement shall terminate upon the date sixty (60) days after the date of the City’s receipt of such written termination notice from User. In the event that User’s or any of its Designee’s use of the Premises is prevented or hampered by occurrences beyond User’s, such Designee’s and/or the City’s control, including without limitation, any labor controversy, strike or threat of strike, act of God, weather conditions, epidemic and/or pandemic, governmental action, regulation, or decree, or for any other customary “force majeure” r eason, including, without limitation, unavailability or failure of the showrunner, executive, director, any other production personnel or any member of the cast to perform for any reasons (including, without limitation, death, illness, incapacity, disfigur ement, failure, refusal or neglect) (collectively a “Suspension Event”), User shall have the right to suspend the Term for the duration of such Suspension Event and any period required by User or its Designee (as applicable) to resume and perform its activ ities. Neither party shall be liable for any damages caused by any delay or failure to perform the whole or any part of this Location Agreement, where such performance is made impossible or impractical due to a Suspension Event. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Premises are not utilized for the full period of time provided for in this Paragraph, then User will pay the City only a proportionate amount of the applicable rental fee for the Premises on such future dates. The parties acknowledge the existence of the current COVID-19 global pandemic. If production of any movie, program, television show or television commercial is prevented, suspended, or postponed by reason of (and including but not limited to): (i) a high prevalence of COVID -19 (as determined by User in its sole discretion); (ii) a COVID- 19 related government statute, regulation, or order; or (iii) the COVID -19 related absence, illness, or injury of any cast or crew member, the parties agree that any such event shall be considered a Suspension Event and that User shall have the right to extend the Term for the duration of the Suspension Event and for any period required to resume and perform the applicable activities without paying any additional fees. 6. Rental Fee and Costs: a. User shall pay rent to the City for the Premises during the Term, and any Renewal Term, as follows: (i) equal monthly payments of $30,000.00, plus H.S.T., from the Commencement Date to December 31, 2021. The first of such payments to be made on the Commencement Date or on the first day of a calendar month (if the Commencement Date is on such 1st day). If the Commencement Date is not the first day of a calendar month, the rent for such month shall be pro-rated on a per diem basis; (ii) the sum of $360,000.00, plus H.S.T., paid in equal monthly payments of $30,000.00, plus H.S.T, from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022; and - 304 - 3 PPAB 6156377v7 (iii) for each successive year of the Term from and after December 31, 2022, or any Renewal Term, the annual rent shall increase by an amount equal to 2%, plus H.S.T., of the annual rent of the previous year of the Term or any Renewal Term. b. Rent shall be payable by the User to the City on the first day of each calendar month during the Term and any Renewal Term. b. User agrees that the cost of any relocation, extension, alteration or extraordinary maintenance of existing utilities or services that is required by User during the Term shall be the responsibility of the User. c. The User shall be responsible for any and all costs and charges which may be required or which may result from User’s use of the Premises during the Term, including but not limited to, hydro, water, maintenance, waste removal, portable washroom facilities, telephone service, security, and snow removal. d. Any necessary electrical installation, or any other installations or site works required by User during the Term shall be at the User’s sole expense. 7. Vacating: User will leave the Premises in substantially as good condition as when received by it, excepting reasonable wear and tear for the use of the Premises for the purposes herein permitted, and User will remove all of its sets, structures and other material and equipment from the Premises, unless otherwise agreed to by User. The City may, in its sole discretion, provide written request to the User at least three (3) months prior to the expiration of the Term of the City’s desire to retain all sets, structures and o ther material and equipment located on the Premises for the City purposes and User shall consider in good faith the City’s request with the terms and conditions of such retention being subject to good faith negotiations (if approved by the User). If applic able, the parties agree that User may take possession of the Premises after vacancy on one or multiple occasions for retakes, added, or new scenes on other dates and times which will be mutually determined by the parties hereto and all recordings on such d ates and times shall be included within the terms of this Location Agreement. The City agrees to assist User in making such schedule in good faith and in a reasonable manner and not so as to frustrate the purposes or renegotiate any of the terms and conditions of this Location Agreement or to impede, hinder, or delay in any manner whatsoever production, exhibition, distribution or exploitation of any movie, program, television show or television commercial or the advertising, promotion or publicity thereof. 8. Damages/Security Deposit: The City agrees to submit to User in writing, within fifteen (15) days of User vacating the Premises (and within fifteen (15) days of completion of any additional use by User of the Premises, if at all) a detailed list of all claimed property damage for which User is responsible (“Damage List”), provided, however, that if such Damage List is not provided to User by the City in accordance with the terms hereunder, then the City agrees that the Premises has been satisfactorily resto red to the Premises’ prior condition in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Location Agreement. User shall have the right to inspect the alleged damage. In the event that any actual and verifiable damage to the Premises is caused directly by U ser’s use of the Premises, User agrees to pay for all necessary repairs. Upon the full execution of this Location Agreement, the User shall provide the City with a refundable security deposit in the amount of $100,000 (CAD). The security deposit will be he ld by the City to secure against any verified and unrepaired damage to the Premises caused by the User as indicated on the Damage List. If the City determines that no damage has been caused to the Premises or fails to provide the Damage List within the time period set forth above, the security deposit shall be returned by the City to the User within thirty (30) days of the User vacating the Premises. 9. Indemnification: User will indemnify and hold the City harmless from and against any liabilities, losses, claims, demands, damages or injury (including death) costs (including without limitation reasonable outside attorneys’ fees) and expenses arising in connection with (a) any breach or alleged breach by User of this Location Agreement (except with respect to matters for which the City indemnifies User) or of any of User’s representations or warranties contained herein; or (b) User’s use of the Premises (except with respect to matters for which the City indemnifies User). The City will indemnify and hold harmless User and all parent, sister and related entities of User, all Designees, successors, assigns of User, all distributors, exhibitors, stations, sponsors and advertising agencies of any program incorporating any audio and video recordings taken on or of the Premises, and all of the officers, directors, agents, employees and shareholders of each of the foregoing from and against any liabilities, losses, claims, demands, - 305 - 4 PPAB 6156377v7 costs (including without limitation reasonable outside attorneys’ fees) and expenses arising in connection with any act or omission of the City’s employee, agents, and/or contractors, in relation to this Location Agreement or occurring on the Premises, or any breach or alleged breach by the City of this Location Agreement or of any of the repr esentations or warranties contained herein. 10. Environmental Compliance and Indemnification: a. The User shall not store, bring in or permit the presence of any “Environmental Contaminant” (which includes any hazardous or toxic substances or materials, including, without limitation, products of waste, contaminants, pollutants, dangerous substances, noxious substances, toxic substances, hazardous wastes, flammables, explosives, radioactive materials, asbestos, lead paint, PCBs, urea formaldehyde foam insulation, r adon gas, chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity, and any other substances or materials declared or defined to be hazardous, toxic, contaminant or pollutant in or pursuant to any law or any authority) in or on the Premises, except if such is required for any of the Uses, and then only if in strict compliance with all laws and requirements of all relevant authorities, including, without limitation, environmental laws, occupational health and safety laws, regulations, requirements, permits a nd by-laws. b. If the User shall bring or create upon the Premises any Environmental Contaminant contrary to the terms of this Location Agreement, then such Environmental Contaminant shall be and remain the sole property of the User and the User shall remove same, at its sole cost and expense as soon as directed to do so by any authority, or if required to effect compliance with any environmental laws, or if required by the City. If any such Environmental Contaminant is not removed forthwith by the User, the City shall be entitled, but not required, upon reasonable prior written notice to User, to remove the same on the User’s behalf, and the User shall reimburse the City for the cost and expense thereof. c. In addition to and without restricting any other obligations or covenants herein, the User covenants that it will: i. comply in all respects with all environmental laws relating to the Premises or use thereof; ii. promptly notify the City in writing of any notice received by User by any authority alleging a possible violation of or with respect to any other matter involving any environmental laws relating to the Premises, or any notice received by User from any party concerning any release or alleged release of any Environmental Contaminant from the Premises; and iii. promptly notify the City of the existence of any Environmental Contaminant on the Premises to the extent released, deposited, placed or used upon the Premises in violation of applicable laws by the User or any person for whom the User is responsible in law. d. In addition to and without restricting any other obligations or covenants contained herein, the User shall indemnify and hold the City harmless at all times from and against all losses, damages, penalties, fines, costs, fees and expenses (including reasonable outside attorneys’ fees and expenses) resulting from: i. any breach of or non-compliance with the foregoing environmental covenants of the User; and ii. any legal or administrative action commenced by or claim made or notice from any third party, including, without limitation, any authority, to or against the City, arising from the introduction of Environmental Contaminants onto, or the release of Environmental Contaminants from, the Premises by the User or those for whom the User is responsible in law. e. The User shall provide the City with an Annual Sustainability Plan that addresses management of the Premises, including, but not limited to, the potential for energy conservation measures, responsible management and diversion of waste streams, site cleanliness to avoid litter, and green fleet practices. - 306 - 5 PPAB 6156377v7 11. Community Engagement: With the assistance of the City, the User shall consider opportunities to engage with local educational institutions and the performing arts commu nity, for the purpose of providing on-site training or mentorship programs related to the film industry. 12. Insurance: a. At the User’s expense, the User shall maintain the following insurance at all times throughout the Term: i. commercial general liability insurance for all liability arising out of bodily injury (including death) and property damage, such insurance to be for not less than $5,000,000.00 per occurrence or loss, naming the City as an additional insured under such policy; and ii. automobile insurance for not less than $2,000,000.00 per occurrence or loss. b. The insurance policy shall state that the policy will not be altered, cancelled or allowed to lapse without thirty (30) days prior notice to the City. The User shall deliver to the City upon the execution of this Location Agreement, a certificate of insurance in a form reasonably satisfactory to the City confirming such insurance coverage. 13. Breach/Remedies: The City acknowledges that, in the event of a breach of this Location Agreement by User or any third party (including any Designee), the damage, if any, caused to the City thereby will not be irreparable or otherwise sufficient to entitle the City to seek or obtain injunctive or other equitable relief. The City acknowledges that the City’s rights and remedies in any such event will be strictly limited to the right, if any, to recover compensatory monetary (but not punitive or consequential) damages in an action at law, and the City will not have the right to rescind or terminate this Location Agreement or any of User’s rights hereunder, nor the right to enjoin the production, exhibition or other exploitation of any audiovisual program, motion picture or other production, or any subsidiary or allied rights with respect thereto, nor will the City have the rig ht to terminate the City’s services or obligations hereunder by reason of such breach. The User shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of such notice to remedy any breach in the manner specified by the City (or such additional time as is agreed to by the City (acting reasonably and in good faith) to be reasonably necessary to remedy any such breach). 14. Duplicates: The City hereby grants User and its Designees the right to construct duplications of the Premises, including without limitation, any names, insignias and signs located thereon and any logos, trademarks, service marks, trade dress and verbiage contained on such signs at or on the Premises (the “Duplicates”) and to use the Duplicates and all photographs and sound recordings made hereunder in any mann er or in merchandising or filming, and to exhibit the Duplicates and all photographs and sound recordings made hereunder in any and all media, versions and forms, now known and hereafter devised, throughout the universe, in all languages, in perpetuity, including all promotion, advertising and publicity for User, its Designees and licensees, and any other companies in any manner affiliated with User or any Designee. The City further agrees to cooperate fully with User and its Designees in connection with the City’s grant of rights contained herein. 15. Rights in Photography: All rights of every kind in and to all photographs and sound recordings made hereunder and the Duplicates shall be owned by User and its Designees, licensees, successors, and assigns, and neither the City nor any other party now or hereafter having an interest in the Premises shall have any right of action against User or any Designee or any other party arising out of, or in connection with, any use of said photographs or sound recordings or the Duplicates. The City releases User and all parent, sister and related entities of User, all Designees, all licensees, successors, assigns of User, all distributors, exhibitors, stations, sponsors and advertising agencies of any program incorporating any audio and video recordings taken on or of the Premises, and all of the officers, directors, agents, employees and shareholders of each of the foregoing from any and all claims, demands, causes of action of any kind or nature whatsoever, and costs arising from or related to the Premises and any of the use of the recordings made on the Premises as contemplated herein, including, without limitation, claims for trade libel, defamation, invasion of privacy, copyright infringement, and trademark infringement and/or dilution. Neither User nor its Designees, licensees, successors and assigns will be obligated to make any actual use of any photography, re cordings, depictions or other references to the Premises hereunder in any audiovisual program, motion picture or otherwise. - 307 - 6 PPAB 6156377v7 16. Assignment: User shall have the right, from time to time in User’s discretion, to sublicense, grant and/or assign all or a portion of its rights and obligations hereunder without the consent of the City or any other party; provided, however that User shall remain secondarily liable for all obligations on User’s part to be performed hereunder unless such assignment is to a person, firm or corporation acquiring a substantial portion of User’s stock and/or assets, or to a major or so-called “mini-major” production or distribution company, U.S. national television network, digital media distributor, major record company, major music publisher or any other financially responsible third party and such assignee agrees to be bound by the terms and condit ions of this Location Agreement, in which case, User shall be relieved of its obligations hereunder. 17. Confidentiality: Except as otherwise authorized by User and/or the telecaster or other exhibitor of the Program, the City shall not (and shall not authorize others to) publicize, advertise or promote the appearance of the Premises in any movie, program, television show or television commercial made or produced by User or any of its Designees. The City acknowledges and understands the valuable and proprietary nature of any such movie, program, television show or television commercial and any information the City obtains or learns as a result of User’s or any Designee’s use of and filming the Premises, including but not limited to information and photographs regarding the User, the Designees, and any movie or program participants, the set, storylines, premise and concept and methods of production shall be considered “Confidential Material”. The City further acknowledges that the City may not disclose such Confidential Material to any third parties by any means, including, without limitation, via social media outlets such as Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat and Twitter, unless such information is already in the public domain or is required by law. Further, the City shall not use any name, logo, any movie or program title, trademark or other proprietary mark of User or of its Designees or assigns in any manner. The City is strictly prohibited from taking any photographs or making any recordings of any kind of the activities of User and its Designees (including, without limitation, the cast, crew, and/or the sets). The City agrees that any violation of the foregoing provisions shall constitute and be treated as a material breach of this Location Agreement, which will cause irreparable harm to User, its applicable Designee and/or the telecaster or other exhibitor of the Program entitling User to seek or obtain injunctive and other equitable relief (without posting bond) to prevent and/or cure any breach or threatened breach of this Paragraph by the City. In addition, the City shall abide by any security, confidentiality and/or social media policies provided by User or any Designee or exhibitor in writing. 18. Rules and Regulations: a. The User and its Designees shall abide by all fire, public health, safety and building regulations and ordinances and conform with the requirements of all municipal, provincial and feder al laws, by-laws and regulations in relation to their respective use of the Premises, and obtain and pay for all necessary licences and permits, and shall not do or suffer to be done anything to the Premises or any part thereof in violation of such laws, ordinances, rules, by-laws and regulations. If the attention of the User is called to any such violation, the User shall immediately remedy (or cause to be remedied) such violation. In the event the User fails to remedy (or cause to be remedied) any such violation which is material and if such violation continues beyond the applicable notice and cure period, the City may, it its sole discretion, order the User to discontinue the use of the Premises until such time as the violation is remedied. b. The User or its Designee shall be responsible, at is sole cost, for the provision of any and all safety, fire protection equipment and control requirements for the filming activities. c. The User certifies that it is aware of its duties and obligations under the Occupatio nal Health and Safety Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.O.1, as amended, and shall ensure that its employees, contractors, subcontractors and their employees are aware of their respective duties and obligations under the Act and have sufficient knowledge and training to perform all works and services safely and in compliance with the Act. The User shall rectify (or cause to be rectified) any unsafe act or practice and any non-compliance with the Act immediately upon being notified by any person of the existence of such act, practice or non-compliance. The User shall indemnify and save harmless the City, i. from any loss, inconvenience, damage or cost to the City which may result from the User or any of its employees, contractors, subcontractors and their employees failing to act safely or to comply in all respects with the Act in the performance of any works, services or activities on the Premises; and - 308 - 7 PPAB 6156377v7 ii. against any action, claim or costs related thereto, brought against the City by any person arising out of any unsafe act or practice or any non-compliance with the Act by the User, any of its employees, contractors, subcontractors and their employees in the performance of any works, services or activities on the Premises. d. The User shall abide by the Health and Safety regulations under Section 21 of the Film and Television Health and Safety Advisory Committee of the Ontario Ministry of Labour, Training and Skills Development. e. Upon execution of this Location Agreement, the User shall provide (or cause its applicable Designees to provide) proof of a Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) “Clearance Certificate” stating that the User’s employees, including agents, contractors and consultants, have adequate WSIB coverage/protection. f. Notwithstanding anything the contrary in this Paragraph 18, it is agreed and understood that the City has waived building permits and in lieu thereof, User has provided the City with their drawings with an engineer’s seal. 19. Notices: a. Any notices to be given or required under this Location Agreement shall be in writing and sent by personal delivery, electronic transmission (email), national overnight delivery service or by ordinary prepaid mail to the following addresses: to the User at: Address: William F. White International Inc. 800 Islington Avenue Toronto Ontario M8Z 6A1 Attention: RICK PEROTTO and to the City at: Pickering Civic Complex, One The Esplanade, Pickering, ON L1V 6K7 Attention: City Clerk Fax No.: 905.420.9685, or by email : clerks@pickering.ca b. The parties may designate in writing to each other a change of address at any time. Notice by mail shall be deemed to have been received on the fifth (5th) business day after the date of mailing, and notice by personal delivery or electronic transmission (email) shall be deemed to have been receive d at the time of the delivery or transmission. In the event of an interruption in postal service, notice shall be given by personal delivery or electronic transmission (email) 20. Miscellaneous: a. The User agrees to contact and enter into any required agreements, if applicable, with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) at no cost to the City. b. The City will duly execute and deliver (or procure the due execution and delivery to User) any additional documents which User may reasonably require to evidence its rights hereunder. c. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed or construed by the User or the City, nor by any third party, as creating the relationship of principal and agent, landlord and tenant, partnership or of joint venture between the User and the City. d. The User hereby agrees to keep title to the Premises, including every part thereof, free and clear of any lien, encumbrance or security interest or notice thereof. The User shall discharge all claims for lien and vacate all certificates of action filed with the City or registered on title to the Premises as a result of the User’s failure - 309 - 8 PPAB 6156377v7 to pay for any materials, work or service within thirty (30) days of being requested to do so by the City. The User shall not enter into any agreements for the Premises which would run with the Premises and become an obligation of the City upon termination or expiration of this Location Agreement. e. The User shall not have the right to register this Location Agreement or notice thereof against title to the Premises f. This Location Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted pursuant to the laws of the Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein. g. The failure of any party to exercise any right, power or option or to enforce any remedy or to insist upon the strict compliance with the terms, conditions and covenants under this Location Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of the terms, conditions and covenants herein with respect to that or any other or subsequent breach thereof nor a waiver by that party any time thereafter to require strict compliance with all terms, conditions and covenants hereof, including the terms, conditions and covenants with respect to which the party has failed to exercise such right, power or option. Nothing shall be construed or have the effect of a waiver except an instrument in writing signed by a duly authorized officer of the applicable party which expressly waives a right, power or option under this Location Agreement. h. This Location Agreement will enure to the benefit of and will be binding upon the parties’ respective affiliates, successors, licensees, assigns, heirs and representatives. This Location Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties hereto with respect to the subject mat ter hereof and cannot be amended except by a written instrument signed by the parties hereto. If any provision of this Location Agreement is adjudged to be void or unenforceable, same shall not affect the validity of this Location Agreement or of any other provision hereof. The City gives to User the foregoing grant of rights, consent and authority with the full knowledge and understanding that User will incur substantial expense in reliance thereon. In addition to any of its other rights or remedies allowed by law or equity pursuant hereto or otherwise, including, without limitation, consequential damages, User will be entitled to seek injunctive relief in the event of any breach of the City of its representations, warranties and agreements hereunder. This Location Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument. Counterparts shall be accepted in original, electronic, or facsi mile form, and the parties to this Location Agreement adopt any signatures received by receiving facsimile or electronic mail as original signatures of the parties. [signature page follows] - 310 - 9 PPAB 6156377v7 ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO: The Corporation of the City of Pickering (the “City”) By: David Ryan Its: Mayor By: Susan Cassel Its: City Clerk Dated: William F. White International Inc. (“User”) By: Its: Dated: - 311 - Attachment #1 to Report #PLN 20-21 WILLIAM F. WHITE INTERNATIONAL INC. AND ESG Within the Canadian flm and television producion indusry, William F. White International Inc. (WFW) is recognized as a leader in the movement to create and promote a more environmentally susainable flm and television producion indusry. We are the frs indusry sakeholder to publicly commit to meaningful carbon reducion targets within our operations (to achieve carbon neutrality by 2030) and will achieve this goal through a comprehensive energy retroft of our facilities, a robus wase management initiative tasked with achieving zero wase to landfll by 2025, and a commitment to new technology that will help us eliminate emissions from the producs we rent to our clients. Once we assume management, we anticipate that “The Backlot” will provide a fantasic, high profle opportunity to apply the principles of circular wase management. Rather than have consrucion wase simply end up in landfll, we will work with tenants to design for deconsrucion, so that materials that can be salvaged are reused or donated to the community (Habitat for Humanity, e.g.), or in the wors case, properly recycled where possible. We will work with all tenants to ensure that food donations are an integral part of their wase management srategy and will build on the tremendous success we have had working with Second Harves. Finally, in an efort to cut emissions created at the Backlot, we plan to work closely with the utility Elexicon Energy to invesigate opportunities to reduce the need for diesel generators, up to and including assessing the feasibility of insalling an onsite solar array to provide power that could recharge producion batery packs and provide clean power to producion. © 2021 William F. White International Inc. - 312 - WILLIAM F. WHITE INTERNATIONAL INC. AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT For over 50 years, William F. White International Inc. (WFW) has taken a keen interes in sharing our knowledge and experience in the motion picure indusry with young flmmakers. It is with great pride that we help nurture their careers so that they may grow to be award-winning cinematographers, direcors, writers, or technicians. Through our National Grants program, we are able to donate in-kind equipment that sudent flmmakers can use to take their assignments to the next level. We pride ourselves in our internship and mentorship programs across the country from Vancouver to Halifax. We will resond in the same manner for sudents in local educational insitutions in the City of Pickering and surrounding area. Through our pos-secondary scholarship program, created to celebrate the memory of academy award-winning cinematographer and friend of WFW, Vilmos Zsigmond, we have helped make college tuition for talented recipients into an obtainable goal. We have worked with local colleges for many years, providing tours of our 340,000-sf facility located in Etobicoke and demonsrating the workings of one of the world’s larges flm lighting inventories. We plan to continue this tradition of creating opportunities for sudents in the local flm indusry for years to come. We are excited to be a part of Pickering’s community and we equally look forward to sharing our experiences with “The Backlot” with the next generation of young flmmaking professionals. © 2021 William F. White International Inc. - 313 - Report to Council Report Number: PLN 21-21 Date: April 26, 2021 From: Kyle Bentley Director, City Development & CBO Subject: Lease Agreement – Open Studio Art Café -Temporary Patio Program – use of City owned lands -File: D-1000-006 Recommendation: 1.That Council approve the Draft Lease Agreement for the Temporary Use of City Property adjacent to 617 Liverpool Road, between the City of Pickering and Open Studio Art Café for the period May 1, 2021 to November 30, 2021, as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN 21-21; 2.That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Lease Agreement between the City of Pickering and Open Studio Art Café in the form as appended to this report subject to revisions as may be acceptable to the Chief Administrative Officer, the City Solicitor and the Director, City Development & CBO; and 3.That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. Executive Summary: Open Studio Art Café (OSAC), located at 617 Liverpool Road in the Nautical Village, has submitted a request to operate a temporary outdoor patio on the City owned boulevard in front of their establishment. The proposed location and design (see Location Map, Attachment #1) of the temporary patio space have met the requirements laid out by the City’s ‘Temporary Patios – Municipal Review and Approval Process’. Staff therefore recommends that the City enter into a lease agreement with OSAC for temporary use of the City’s boulevard from May 1, 2021 to November 30, 2021 (see Draft Lease Agreement, Appendix I). Financial Implications: There are no financial implications associated with this lease agreement. Discussion: In June of 2020, Municipal By-law 7769/20 was approved, in support of the creation of new or expanded, temporary restaurant patios. This By-law was amended in November of 2020, extending the date of effectiveness of temporary or new patio spaces until such time as all Provincial Emergency Orders related to the COVID-19 pandemic have been lifted. - 314 - Report PLN 21-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Lease Agreement – Open Studio Art Café Page 2 Per the direction of the City’s Temporary Patios – Municipal Review and Approval Process, operation of a temporary patio space on City owned property is subject to the execution of a lease agreement with the City and is permitted for a limited term of operation that does not conflict with the City’s municipal winter maintenance operations. Open Studio Art Café (OSAC) is located at 617 Liverpool Road in the Nautical Village and has requested permission to operate a temporary patio space on the City owned boulevard directly in front of their establishment. Fire Services have reviewed their Request to Review for Temporary Patio, and have no objections to the proposed design or location of the temporary patio space. The term of the lease agreement is for 6 months, from May 1, 2021 to November 30, 2021. The temporary patio must be removed at the end of the lease term in order to meet the requirements of the City’s winter maintenance program. OSAC has provided the requisite Certificate of Insurance noting the City as an added insured, with coverage amounts as required by the City. Staff therefore recommends the City enter into a lease agreement (see Draft Lease Agreement, Appendix I) with OSAC for the temporary use of the City owned boulevard, as indicated in the attached site drawing (see Location Map, Attachment #1). Appendix: Appendix I: Draft Lease Agreement Attachment: 1. Location Map - 315 - Report PLN 21-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Lease Agreement – Open Studio Art Café Page 3 Prepared By: Catherine Hodge Senior Coordinator, Development Liaison Approved/Endorsed By: Kyle Bentley, P. Eng. Director, City Development & CBO CH:ld Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Marisa Carpino, M.A. Chief Administrative Officer - 316 - Appendix I to Report No. PLN 21-21 Draft Lease Agreement - 317 - 1 This Licence Agreement is made this _____ day of April, 2021. Between: Open Studio Art Café Inc. (the "Restaurant”) - and - The Corporation of the City of Pickering (the "City") Whereas the City owns the lands legally described as Liverpool Road, south of Annland Street being the Road Allowance between Lots 22 and 23, Range 3, Concession Broken Front, Pickering; and Whereas the Restaurant wishes to use a portion of the City-owned lands as shown in red on the location map attached hereto as Schedule “A” (the “Lands”) for the purpose of operating a temporary outdoor patio for the serving of food and beverages as shown on the plans and specifications attached hereto as Schedule “B” (the “Temporary Patio”); and Whereas the City has agreed to grant to the Restaurant a non-exclusive licence permitting the Temporary Patio on the Lands subject to the terms and conditions set out in this Licence. Now Therefore in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth and other good and valuable consideration, the City and the Restaurant agree as follows: Licence 1. Subject to the terms of this Licence, the City grants permission to the Restaurant to use the Lands on a non-exclusive basis for the Temporary Patio. 2. The Restaurant acknowledges that this Licence does not create an interest in the Lands nor does the Restaurant claim any past or present interest, howsoever arising, as a result of or connected in any way with the use and occupation of the Lands. - 318 - 2 3. The licence granted herein is only for the duration of this Licence and only for the purposes and uses stated herein. No other purposes shall be permitted without prior approval from the City. 4. The licence granted herein is not exclusive and the City reserves the right to enter onto the Lands and to grant, renew or extend licenses and other interests to other third parties. Term 5. Unless earlier terminated as provided herein, the term of this Licence shall commence on May 1, 2021, and expire on the earlier of November 30, 2021 at 9 pm, or such time as restrictions under the Province of Ontario's COVID-19 response framework are lifted. (the “Term”). 6. Except as otherwise provided for in this Licence, this Licence may be terminated by the City at any time and for any reason during the Term upon sixty (60) days prior written not ice to the Restaurant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if at any time the Restaurant is in default in the performance of any of the obligations under this Licence, the City shall have the right to terminate this Licence forthwith and thereupon all the rights of the Restaurant shall immediately cease. The City shall not be liable for payment to the Restaurant for any damage or loss arising from the termination of this Licence by the City pursuant to this Section . 7. Upon the expiry or earlier termination of this Licence, the Restaurant shall remove the Temporary Patio, at its own expense, and restore the Lands to its original condition. Fees 8. The Restaurant shall not be required to pay to the City any fee for this Licence, but shall be responsible for payment of all applicable non-City permits, licences, staffing charges, and approval fees where applicable. Applicable Laws 9. The Restaurant shall comply strictly with all applicable laws, by-laws, rules and regulations governing its use of the Lands for the Temporary Patio, including, but not limited to, the City’s Noise By-law, Traffic and Parking By-laws, the Ontario Building Code, the Ontario Fire Code, and all applicable requirements of the Technical Standards & Safety Authority. 10. The Restaurant, where applicable, shall obtain all necessary permits, licenses and approvals that may be required in connection with its use of the Lands for the Temporary Patio, including, but not limited to: a) The City of Pickering form – ‘Request to Review for Temporary Patio’; b) Tents, should they be constructed, must comply with applicable building permit requirements under the Building Code Act, Ontario Building Code (OBC) and the City’s Temporary Tent Standard Operating Procedure (City Development Department); - 319 - 3 c) Compliance with the Health & Safety Guidelines as issued for outdoor patio operations by the Province of Ontario and the Durham Region Health Department; and d) No smoking signs to be placed, in accordance with the Durham Region smoking ban by-law. Fire Safety 11. The Restaurant acknowledges that the Temporary Patio is subject without notice, to a fire inspection to be carried out by City of Pickering Fire Services to determine compliance with the Ontario Fire Code. 12. The location of the Temporary Patio must maintain a 1.2 metre clearance from all fire hydrants or fire connections (Siamese) and they must be visible and accessible at all times. 13. Portable fire extinguishers, (a) shall be present if cooking equipment is used on the Temporary Patio, and any location serving alcoholic beverages. Extinguishers must be properly rated for the hazard present. Portable extinguishers shall be kept operable and fully charged; (b) shall be located so that they are easily seen and shall be accessible at all times ; and (c) in proximity to a fire hazard shall be located so as to be accessible without exposing the operator to undue risk. 14. Restaurant staff must be familiar with the safe operation of portable fire extinguishers in their work area. Utilities 15. The Restaurant shall assume all costs and expenses in connection with the Temporary Patio, including, but not limited to, all utility costs. 16. The Restaurant and its employees, agents and contractors, including its electrical support group, is prohibited from altering City electrical infrastructure, and is only permitted to use existing outlets. 17. The Restaurant shall ensure all power cords have been covered to avoid tripping hazards. 18. The City assumes no responsibility to the Restaurant for the temporary or unavoidable interruption of the supply of any public utility service due to any cause whatsoever . Hours of Operation 19. Subject to any other regulatory approval (e.g. liquor licence), the Restaurant will maintain their usual hours of operation for the existing restaurant (or existing patio). Maintenance 20. The Restaurant shall ensure that the Lands and the Temporary Patio are maintained in a state of good and safe repair, and in a clean and sanitary condition during the Term, to the - 320 - 4 satisfaction of the City. The Restaurant shall immediately notify the City of any damage to the Lands. 21. In the event that the Restaurant wishes, during the Term, to replace or materially alter the Temporary Patio, the Restaurant shall not commence replacement or alteration unless: (a) the City has approved the Restaurant’s plans, specifications and appearance of the proposed replacement or alteration; (b) otherwise agreed to by the City, the replacement or alteration does not occupy an area that is larger than the Lands and shall be situate in the same location as the Temporary Patio; (c) the Restaurant has received all regulatory approvals a nd/or the replacement or alteration complies with all regulatory requirements; and (d) the Restaurant has obtained any necessary permits for the work to be undertaken. 22. The Restaurant shall ensure that any personnel installing, maintaining, replacing, altering or repairing the Temporary Patio shall be properly trained and fully qualified to perform the relevant work. The Restaurant shall ensure that it complies with the Construction Act and takes all necessary steps to prevent a lien from being claimed in respect of the Lands. Waste Management 23. The Restaurant shall remove any and all refuse generated by the use of the Temporary Patio, as it occurs and at the expense of the Restaurant. Insurance 24. The Restaurant, at its own expense, shall provide, (a) comprehensive general public liability insurance, identifying the City as an additional insured, including coverage for personal injury, contractual liability, non-owned automobile liability, death and property damage, on an occurr ence basis with respect to the Temporary Patio and the use and occupancy of the Lands, with coverage for any one occurrence or claim of not less than $5,000,000, which insurance shall protect the City in respect of claims by the Restaurant as if the City was separately insured; (b) a certificate of insurance coverage in a form satisfactory to the City, which insurance coverage shall be kept in full force and effect throughout the Term; (c) Thirty (30) days prior written Notice, by registered mail, will be given by the insurer(s) to the City of Pickering if this Policy is cancelled or if any material change occurs that would, for any reason, affect this Certificate or the City of Pickering as outlined in the coverage specified herein. Notice will be given to: - 321 - 5 (d) The Corporation of the City of Pickering, Attention: City Development Department, One The Esplanade, Pickering, ON, L1V 6K7 25. The Restaurant shall not do or omit or permit to be done anything that causes any insurance premium of the City to be increased, and if any insurance premium shall be so increased, the Restaurant shall pay to the City forthwith upon demand the amount of such increase. If notice of cancellation or lapse shall be given respecting any insurance policy of the City or if any insurance policy shall be cancelled or refused to be renewed by an insurer by reason of the use or occupation of the Lands, the Restaurant shall forthwith remedy or rectify such use or occupation upon being requested to do so in writing by the City and if the Restaurant shall fail to do so the City may, at its option, terminate this Licence forthwith by notice to the Restaurant. Liability and Indemnification 26. The City shall not be liable to the Restaurant for any loss, damage or personal injury (including death) relating to the Temporary Patio or the use and occupancy of the Lands, whether caused by fire, theft, burglary, or otherwise, unless such loss or damage was caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its servants, agents or employees. 27. Once any equipment is erected on the Lands, the Restaurant shall determine its own terms for overnight security of its equipment, and the Lands and equipment shall be and remain at the risk of the Restaurant. 28. Save and except for the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the City, the Restaurant agrees to indemnify and save the City, and all its directors, officers, employees, elected officials, agents, contractors and representatives harmless from any and all losses, actions, damages, claims, liability, costs, expenses and demands, of any kind, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, all claims for personal injury, illness or death, including any claims arising from the COVID-19 virus, or from any act or omission of the Restaurant or those for whom the Restaurant is at law responsible arising out of any action whatsoever by the Restaurant, its directors, employees, agents, contractors, invitees or anyone in connection with the Restaurant’s use and occupancy of the Lands or the presence of Temporary Patio on the Lands. This provision shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Licence. 29. The Restaurant waives any and all claims against, releases from liability and agrees not to sue the City, its directors, officers, employees, elected officials, agents, contractors and representatives for any personal injury, illness, death or any other loss sustained by the Restaurant or for which the Restaurant may be responsible arising out of, or in connection with the Restaurant’s use and occupancy of the Lands or the presence of the Temporary Patio on the Lands, including any loss arising from the COVID-19 virus. Force Majeure 30. The City shall not be liable for any damages caused by any delay or f ailure to perform the whole or any part of this Licence, where such performance is made impossible or impractical due to any cause direct or indirect, beyond the control of the City, including, but not limited to, labour disruptions, strikes, lockouts, fire, flood, storms, acts of nature, natural disasters, acts of war, insurrection and terrorism, outbreak, pandemic, epidemic, disease or emergency. - 322 - 6 Relationship of Parties 31. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed or construed by the parties, nor by any third party, as creating the relationship of principal and agent, landlord and tenant, partnership or of joint venture between the parties, it being understood and agreed that none of the provisions contained herein, nor any of the acts of the parties shall create any relationship betw een the parties other than that of licensor and licensee as described in this Licence. Commercial Tenancies Act 32. The parties agree that the provisions of the Commercial Tenancies Act DO NOT apply to this Licence between the parties. Notice 33. Any notice or other communication required or permitted to be given hereu nder shall be in writing, and shall be sufficiently given if sent by pre-paid registered mail from a post office in Canada addressed in the case of the City to: Pickering Civic Complex, One The Esplanade, Pickering, ON L1V 6K7 Email: citydev@pickering.ca Attention: Director, City Development & CBO Fax No.: 905.420.7648 and in the case of the Restaurant to: 617 Liverpool Road Pickering, ON L1W 1R1 Attention: Michele Bolton Email: draw@openstudioartcafe.com Phone No.: 905.420.2233 or cell: 905.626.7300 Such notice may be given by hand delivery or sent electronically by either party to the other. Any such notice mailed shall be deemed to have been given on the third (3 rd) business day following such mailing or, if delivered by hand, shall be deemed to have been given on the day of delivery or, if sent electronically, shall be deemed to have been given on the business day following transmission. In the event of a postal strike or pending postal strike, any or all notices must be given by personal delivery or by electronic means. Title 34. The Restaurant hereby agrees to keep title to the Lands, including every part thereof, free and clear of any lien, encumbrance or security interest or notice thereof. The Restaurant shall not - 323 - 7 enter into any agreements for the Lands which would run with the Lands and become an obligation of the City upon termination or expiration of this Licence. Time 35. In all respects, time shall be of the essence of this Licence. Counterparts 36. This Licence may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same document. The execution of this Licence will not become effective until counterparts hereof have been executed by all the parties hereto. Counterparts may be executed either in original or electronic form and the parties adopt any signatures received in electronic form as original signatures of the parties. General 37. The City shall have the right to enter the Lands at any time for any reason. 38. The Restaurant agrees to ensure activities are limited to the typical operation of a commercial temporary outdoor patio and will not inhibit in any way the safety and enjoyment of the public or its use of the adjacent public owned lands. 39. The Restaurant shall not alter, add to or vary in any way any part of the Lands without the prior approval of the City. 40. This Licence shall not be assignable by the Restaurant without the consent of the City, which consent may be arbitrarily refused. 41. This Licence shall enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns. 42. Schedules “A” and “B” attached to this Licence form part of this Licence. The recitals at the head of this Licence are true and accurate and form a part hereof. 43. No amendment to this Licence shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by both parties. 44. The failure of any party to exercise any right, power or option or to enforce any remedy or to insist upon the strict compliance with the terms, conditions and covenants under this Licence shall not constitute a waiver of the terms, conditions and covenants herein with respect to that or any other or subsequent breach thereof nor a waiver by that party any time thereafter to require strict compliance with all terms, conditions and covenants hereof, including the terms, conditions and covenants with respect to which the party has failed to exercise such right, power or option. Nothing shall be construed or have the effect of a waiver except an instrument in writing signed by a duly authorized officer of the applicable party which expressly waives a right, power or option under this Licence. - 324 - 8 45. The headings in this Licence have been inserted as a matter of convenience and for reference only and in no way define, limit or enlarge the scope of meaning of this Licence nor any of the provisions hereof. 46. The Restaurant shall not have the right to register this Licence or notice thereof against title to the Lands or any part thereof. In Witness Whereof the City and the Restaurant have executed this Licence as of the date first written above. Open Studio Art Café Inc. _________________________________ Name: Title: _____________________________________ Name: Title: I/We have authority to bind the Corporation. The Corporation of the City of Pickering Dave Ryan, Mayor Susan Cassel, City Clerk - 325 - 9 Schedule “A” Location Map of the Lands Location of temporary patio on City of Pickering lands, known legally as: Liverpool Road, south of Annland Street being the Road Allowance between Lots 22 and 23, Range 3, Concession Broken Front, Pickering Temporary Patio Location – Open Studio Art Café Municipal boulevard in front of 617 Liverpool Road, Pickering - 326 - 10 Schedule “B” Plans and Specifications of the Temporary Patio Proposed plans and specifications for the temporary patio are subject to inspection by the City and must comply at all times with current Health & Safety regulations as may be issued by the Province of Ontario's COVID-19 response framework or Region of Durham Health Department. Not to scale - 327 - Tempora ry Pa t io Locat ion This map depicts a general loc ation for the proposed temporary pat io. Exact dimens ions to be determined thro ugh an on-s ite ins pection by C ity staff. -.. •I WI . - Location Map -~o(-File: Temp Patio fo r Open Studio Art Cafe PlCKERlNG Appli ca nt: C ity Dev elopment Property Desc r iption: Liverpool Road, south of Annland Street be inQ the Road Allowance between Lots 22 and 23, Department R ange 3 , Concession B roken Front, P ickering (617 L ive rpool Road ) I Date: Ma r. 0 5, 2021 ··--rporat10110-~-1tyo .. ~-enng r~u~1mparyu.....,r acense m;,m:...,...,ueeas. nn lri!r,vn~Ml~tryo ,r.a.tur 1r<.esouroes L~CA LE: 1 :300 I Al rlghts res.er'.Ed.:® Her Majesty h e Queen tn Right of Canada, DepartmentofNa tural Resouroes. A l l'l9h1S reser'>'ed.: @TE,fa REt E.Alri!rptises l nc. and is s uppfie1s al rights reserved.:© Muniopal Property Assessment Cor pora tion and ilS s uppie,rsal righs rese r\'ed.; '--''"' 1.c: u,...,. "' ~•• n i: ,,, ... ,,.."' Attachment #1 to Report #PLN 21-21 - 328 - Report to Council Report Number: PLN 22-21 Date: April 26, 2021 From: Kyle Bentley Director, City Development & CBO Subject: Two-year period Exemption Request for Minor Variance Application P/CA 21/21 Universal City Six Developments Inc. Part of Lot 21, Concession 1 South, Now Part 2, 40R-18785 (1010 Sandy Beach Road) Recommendation: 1. That Council grants an exemption in accordance with Section 45 (1.4) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990; c. P.13 as amended, and permit the Committee of Adjustment to consider Minor Variance Application P/CA 21/21, resulting from the further processing of the Site Plan or Building Permit applications submitted by Universal City Six Developments Inc., for lands municipally known as 1010 Sandy Beach Road, before the second anniversary of the day on which an applicant-initiated zoning by-law amendment was enacted for the subject lands. Executive Summary: This report recommends that Council adopt a resolution in accordance with Section 45 (1.4) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990; c. P.13 as amended, permitting the Committee of Adjustment to consider Minor Variance Application P/CA 21/21, submitted by Universal City Six Developments Inc., for 1010 Sandy Beach Road (see Location Map, Attachment #1). The applicant is requesting approval of a minor variance application to marginally increase the maximum building height from 78 metres (26-storeys) to 79.5 metres (27-storeys), and to the eliminate the required minimum 3.0 metre stepback in the main wall of the point tower between the top 6.0 metres and 18.0 metres of a building greater than 73.5 metres in height (24-storeys). The requested variances are in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the City Centre Neighbourhood Official Plan policies, the City Centre Urban Design Guidelines, and the City Centre Zoning By-law 7553/17, as amended. The requested variances are minor in nature and desirable for the proposed development, which creates a landmark gateway into Pickering's City Centre while improving the architectural design of the building and the public realm along Bayly Street and Sandy Beach Road. For these reasons, staff recommend that Council grant the requested exemption. Financial Implications: No direct financial implications are arising from Council's adoption of the recommendation of this report. - 329 - Report PLN 22-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Universal City Six Developments Inc. Page 2 1. Discussion Bill 73, the Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015, amended the Planning Act by removing the ability for an applicant to apply for a minor variance for 2 years following the passing of an applicant-initiated zoning by-law amendment. However, the Planning Act changes also permit a municipal Council to allow minor variance applications to proceed, on a case-by-case basis, by Council resolution. The Province indicated that the intent of the amendment is to prevent, for a 2 year period, zoning provisions that Council determines to be important from being reversed through the minor variance process. 2. Proposed Residential Development In February 2020, Universal City Six Developments Inc. submitted Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 01/20, for the lands located at the northwest corner of Sandy Beach Road and Bayly Street within the City Centre Neighbourhood (see Location Map, Attachment #1). On February 21, 2020, the applicant submitted a formal site plan application (S 02/20), which was intended to implement the proposed development (see Submitted Site Plan, Attachment #2, and Original Submitted Rendering, Attachment #3). On January 25, 2021, City Council enacted By-law 7810/21, which granted site-specific exemptions to permit the construction of a 26-storey residential condominium building consisting of 302 units as reflected in the site plan application. The implementing by-law included a maximum height requirement of 78 metres (26-storeys), and a minimum parking ratio of 0.71 parking spaces per dwelling unit for residents and 0.15 parking spaces per dwelling unit for visitors. Following Council’s enactment of By-law 7810/21 and through the detailed review of the architectural drawings, the applicant was able to find efficiencies in the design of the building by slightly redistributing ceiling heights throughout the building and marginally increasing the overall building height from 78 metres (26-storeys) to 79.5 metres (27-storeys). This change allows the applicant to accommodate an additional 10 residential units for a total of 312 apartment units (see Revised Rendering, Attachment #4). When By-law 7810/21 was drafted, staff and the applicant inadvertently overlooked providing a site-specific amendment to grant an exemption to Section 4.2 j) ii) of the City Centre Zoning By-law 7553/17, which requires a minimum 3.0 metre stepback in the main wall of the point tower, between the top 6.0 metres and 18.0 metres, for building equal to and greater than 73.5 metres in height. No changes have been made to the siting of the building. Therefore, the applicant is requesting this additional variance be included to address the missing provision. - 330 - Report PLN 22-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Universal City Six Developments Inc. Page 3 3. Minor Variance Application P/CA 21/21, Universal City Six Developments Inc. On March 10, 2021, the applicant submitted Minor Variance Application P/CA 21/21 requesting the following variances: • to permit a maximum building height of 79.5 metres (27-storeys); whereas Zoning By-law 7553/17, as amended by By-law 7810/21, requires a maximum building height of 78.0 metres (26-storeys); and • to permit a 0.0 metre stepback between the top 6.0 metres and 18.0 metres of a point tower for buildings equal to and greater than 73.5 metres; whereas Zoning By-law 7553/17 requires a minimum 3.0 metre stepback between the top 6.0 metres and 18.0 metres of a point tower for buildings equal to and greater than 73.5 metres. The minor variance application falls within the 2 year “time out” provision of the Planning Act. A Council resolution is required to enable the Committee of Adjustment to consider this minor variance application. 4. Requested Variances Result in a Development that is consistent with the City Centre Urban Design Guidelines The subject property is within the City Centre Neighbourhood. City Centre has guidelines to provide direction on the design of new development within the City Centre. The applicant is proposing a signature building that provides a gateway condition with increased heights, massing and high-quality architectural design at the corner of Sandy Beach Road and Bayly Street. This site has been identified as a gateway location and is appropriate for increased building heights. For tall buildings, the Guidelines recommend the top of towers to be attractively designed using setbacks, articulation, and other means to contribute positively to the skyline. The applicant is proposing a high-quality architectural design of the building, including the upper storeys of the point tower, by creating a waved design of balconies and canopies to create a bold entry point into the City Centre. The proposal is consistent with the building design objectives of the City Centre Urban Design Guidelines. 5. Minor Increase in Building Height will not Create any other Non-compliances with the City Centre Zoning By-law 7553/17 The City Centre Zoning By-law 7553/17, as amended by By-law 7810/21, requires a minimum parking ratio of 0.71 parking spaces per dwelling unit and 0.15 visitor parking spaces per dwelling unit. The applicant is proposing to provide a total of 269 parking spaces for Universal City Phase Six by reconfiguring the underground parking to accommodate an additional 9 vehicular parking spaces for the 10 additional residential units. The applicant has indicated that the original configuration of the 3-level underground parking structure was located outside of the 10.0 metres by 10.0 metres Region’s daylighting triangle at the intersection of Bayly Street and Sandy Beach Road. After discussions with the Region of Durham Works Department, it was determined that parking on levels P2 and P3 of the underground parking garage can be located within - 331 - Report PLN 22-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Universal City Six Developments Inc. Page 4 this daylight triangle, subject to the applicant entering into a stratification agreement with the Region of Durham. As a result, the applicant has redesigned the 3-level underground parking to accommodate the additional parking. In addition to minimum vehicle parking requirements, the City Centre Zoning By-law has minimum requirements for indoor and outdoor amenity spaces and bicycle parking. The applicant has indicated that the additional 10 dwelling units will require 5 bicycle parking spaces, and 40 square metres of indoor and outdoor amenity space, which can all be provided on-site. The additional 10 residential units will not require any further exceptions to the City Centre Zoning By-law 7553/17. As noted above, when drafting the site-specific exception, staff and the applicant overlooked the zoning requirement for point tower stepbacks for tall buildings within the City Centre Zoning By-law. This requested variance does not represent a change in the architectural design of the building as previously presented to the Planning & Development Committee on December 7, 2020, which has always shown the siting of the building in its current design and did not include stepbacks at the upper levels. Staff are supportive of granting relief from Section 4.2 j) ii) of the City Centre Zoning By-law 7553/17, requiring a minimum 3.0 metre stepback in the main wall of the point tower between the top 6.0 metres and 18.0 metres for buildings equal to and greater than 73.5 metres in height. 6. Conclusion It is recommended that Council grant an exemption, in accordance with Section 45 (1.4) of the Planning Act, and permit Minor Variance Application P/CA 21/21, submitted by Universal City Six Developments Inc. as a result of further processing of the site plan or building permit applications, to be considered by the Committee of Adjustment. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Submitted Site Plan 3. Original Submitted Rendering 4. Revised Rendering - 332 - Report PLN 22-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Universal City Six Developments Inc. Page 5 Prepared By: Tanjot Bal, MCIP, RPP Planner II Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Approved/Endorsed By: Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Chief Planner Kyle Bentley, P. Eng. Director, City Development & CBO TB:ld Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Marisa Carpino, M.A. Chief Administrative Officer - 333 -   aaPickering P a r k w a y Highway 4 0 1 Bayly Street Poprad AvenueTatra A v e nu e Krosno Bou leva rd Reytan Bou leva rd Morden L a n e oad Dr i ve Fordon SubjectProperty Drava Street Bayview Heights Public School Mitchel Park hRSndyBeacAlli nce Road Location Map File No: P/CA 21/21 Applicant: Universal City Six Developments Inc. City Development Property Description: Part of Lot 21, Concession 1 South, Now Part 2 Department 40R-18785 (1010 Sandy Beach Road) Date: Mar 30, 2021 © The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: © Queens Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; SCALE: 1:4,000 © Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers all rights reserved.; © Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its suppliers all rights reserved.; THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. L:\PLANNING\01-MapFiles\A\2020\A 01-20 Universal City (Phase 6)\A01_20_LocationMap.mxd Attachment #1 to Report #PLN 22-21 - 334 - Attachment #2 to Report #PLN 22-21 N City Development Department Submitted Site Plan File No: S 02/20 Applicant: Universal City Six Developments Inc. Property Description: Part of Lot 21, Concession 1 South, Now Part 2, 40R-18785 (1010 Sandy Beach Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Mar 30, 2021 L:\Planning\01-MapFiles\A\2020 - 335 - City Development Department Original Submitted Rendering File No: S 02/20 Applicant: Universal City Six Developments Inc. Property Description: Part of Lot 21, Concession 1 South, Now Part 2, 40R-18785 (1010 Sandy Beach Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Mar 30, 2021 L:\Planning\01-MapFiles\A\2020 Attachment #3 to Report #PLN 22-21 - 336 - L:\Planning\01-MapFiles\S\2020 Mar 30, 2021DATE: Applicant: Property Description: File No: Revised Rendering FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. City Development Department S 02/20 Universal City Six Development Inc. Part of Lot 21, Concession 1 South, Now Part 2, 40R-18785 (1010 Sandy Beach Road) Attachment #4 to Report #PLN 22-21 - 337 - Report to Council Report Number: PLN 25-21 Date: April 26, 2021 From: Kyle Bentley Director, City Development & CBO Subject: Valley Plentiful Community Garden - Draft Memorandum of Understanding - File: D-7001 Recommendation: 1. That Report PLN 25-21 of the Director, City Development & CBO, regarding the Draft Memorandum of Understanding with Valley Plentiful Community Garden, be endorsed; 2. That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Pickering and Valley Plentiful Community Garden Committee, as set out in Attachment #1 of this report, subject to revisions as may be acceptable to the City Solicitor and the Director, City Development & CBO; 3. That the appropriate City staff be directed to take the necessary actions as per the Draft Memorandum of Understanding; and 4. That staff be directed to report back to Council with recommendations pertaining to a community garden policy. Executive Summary: For the past several months, City staff have been working with the newly formed Valley Plentiful Community Garden Committee (the “Committee”) to support the continued operation of the community garden program located at Diana Princess of Wales Park. In particular, staff have been working with the Committee to get the necessary agreements and procedures in place for the 2021 season. The agreements and procedures that govern the Community Garden Program activities (between the Committee and its membership) include an Annual Gardener Membership Application, Garden Membership Agreement & Code of Conduct, Hydro One Agreement Terms and Conditions, COVID-19 Protocols Agreement, and the Conflict Resolution Policy Procedure. The agreement that governs the obligations of the Valley Plentiful Community Garden Committee and its membership (between the Committee and the City of Pickering) are reflected in the Draft Memorandum of Understanding. These documents will help to create a clear and transparent framework by formalizing expectations, rules and roles for the City, Valley Plentiful Community Garden Committee and gardeners with respect to the use of the Diana Princess of Wales Park. The Draft Memorandum of Understanding (see Attachment #1) outlines responsibilities and obligations of the City of Pickering and Valley Plentiful Garden Committee regarding the use of designated lands at Diana Princess of Wales Park. The lands at Diana Princess of Wales Park are owned by Hydro One and leased to the City of Pickering for public recreational purposes. - 338 - Report PLN 25-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Valley Plentiful Community Garden Page 2 As a result, the terms and conditions that govern the operation of the Valley Plentiful Community Garden program are set out in the Draft Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Pickering and Valley Plentiful Garden Committee. Financial Implications: Not applicable to this report. Discussion: Valley Plentiful Community Garden has been a well-loved space for Pickering residents for many years. The garden supports local food security, creates a welcoming space for people to come together and learn, and helps others by supporting the local food bank. As per Council Resolution #224/14, City staff are responsible to prepare and bring back to Council agreements for those associations that have dedicated use of City facilities. Consistent with this directive, City staff have been working with the Valley Plentiful Community Garden since 2020 to develop and formalize an agreement and framework for the operation of Valley Plentiful Community Garden. This framework includes the development of necessary procedures to govern committee activities, obligations for the Committee to possess liability insurance, and a Draft Memorandum of Understanding to permit the use of designated lands at Diana Princess of Wales Park for the Valley Plentiful Community Garden program. The Annual Gardener Membership Application, Garden Membership Agreement & Code of Conduct, Hydro One Agreement Terms and Conditions, COVID-19 Protocols Agreement, and Conflict Resolution Policy Procedure will be executed between the gardeners and the Garden Committee. Staff have reviewed and amended each of these documents from an operational, legal and insurance perspective. The Draft Memorandum of Understanding will be executed between the City of Pickering and the Garden Committee to outline the responsibilities and obligations of each party. These agreements and forms will be reviewed annually should changes be warranted. Planning for the future, there may be more requests for the City to consider and/or support the formation of new community gardens. As a result, staff will review how other municipalities have structured official policies and procedures pertaining to community gardens and report back to Council with a recommendation in late 2021. Attachment: 1. Draft Memorandum of Understanding - 339 - Report PLN 25-21 April 26, 2021 Subject: Valley Plentiful Community Garden Page 3 Prepared By: Chantal Whitaker, BESc (Hons), CSR-P Supervisor, Sustainability Approved/Endorsed By: Kyle Bentley, P. Eng. Director, City Development & CBO CW :ld Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Marisa Carpino, M.A. Chief Administrative Officer - 340 - Attachment #1 to Report #PLN 25-21 Draft Memorandum of Understanding and Garden Agreement Between The Corporation of the City of Pickering and Valley Plentiful Community Garden This Memorandum of Understanding is between Valley Plentiful Community Garden and the City of Pickering, and constitutes a garden agreement regarding use of Diana, Princess of Wales Park as a community garden located at 1550P Diefenbaker Court. City of Pickering Responsibilities •Continue to facilitate the use of the identified site for a community garden (subject to approval from Hydro One). •Supply of pathway woodchips subject to availability. •General grounds maintenance of surrounding park space and trees (not including the fruit trees) related to grass cutting, water supply system, public pathway maintenance and garbage pickup. •Assist the Valley Plentiful Community Garden Committee with the communication and promotion of garden events and initiatives, as appropriate. Garden Committee Responsibilities •Comply with all City of Pickering by-laws, provincial regulations and Hydro One Terms and Conditions. •At its own expense, arrange and maintain general liability insurance satisfactory to the City for all liability arising out of bodily injury (including death) and property damage, such insurance to be not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or loss, to be in full force and effect at all times. A copy of the Certificate of Insurance confirming such insurance coverage shall be provided to the City and the City shall be an Additional Insured on such policy. The policy shall contain an undertaking to the insurer to notify the City in writing not less than thirty (30) days prior to any material change, cancellation or termination of the policy. •Administer the signing and compliance of the following: •Annual Gardener Membership Application; •Garden Membership Agreement & Code of Conduct; •Hydro One Agreement Terms and Conditions; •COVID-19 Protocols Agreement; and the •Conflict Resolution Policy Procedure •Maintain regular contact with the designated City of Pickering representative. •Provide the City of Pickering representative with a list of Garden Committee members and their contact information. - 341 - • If requested, provide the City of Pickering representative with signed copies of the Annual Gardener Membership Application, Garden Membership Agreement & Code of Conduct, COVID-19 Protocols, Hydro Agreement Terms and Conditions for each member. • Maintain a ‘waiting list’ for those interested in participating in the garden. • Maintain and secure the community garden, garden sheds, compost containers, fruit trees and other community garden infrastructure at no cost to the City of Pickering. • Provide the City of Pickering representative with a brief year-end report summarizing garden activities and future garden plans. • Assist the City of Pickering with communication and promotion of events and initiatives, as appropriate. Community Garden Committee Representative Date Draft _______________________________ Name The Corporation of the City of Pickering Date Draft _______________________________ Name Title I have the authority to bind the Corporation. The Corporation of the City of Pickering Date _______________________________ Name Title I have the authority to bind the Corporation. Draft - 342 - Memo To: Susan Cassel April 20, 2021 City Clerk From: Catherine Rose Chief Planner Copy: Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Subject: Amending By-law for Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 05/15 Seaton TFPM Inc. Part Lots 17 to 19, Concession 4, Part Lots 17 to 21, Concession 5 City of Pickering Amending By-law 7838/21 Statutory Public Meeting Date October 5, 2015 and March 2, 2020 Planning & Development Committee Date April 6, 2021 Purpose and Effect of By-law The purpose of the amending zoning by-law is to permit the implementation of a draft plan of subdivision that consists of 246 detached dwellings, 107 townhouses dwelling units, village greens, and new municipal streets. Council Meeting Date April 26, 2021 Note Not applicable RP:ld J:\Documents\Development\D-3200\2015\SP-2015-03, A 05-15\By-law\By-law Chart Memo to Clerks.docx Attachments By-law Text By-law Schedule Original Signed By Catherine Rose - 343 - The Corporation of the City of Pickering By-law No. 7838/21 Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 7364/14, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham, for land at Part Lots 17 to 19, Concession 4, Part Lots 19 to 21, Concession 5, City of Pickering (A 05/15 (R)) Whereas the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering received an application to rezone portions of the subject lands being Part Lots 17 to 19, Concession 4, Part Lots 19 to 21, Concession 5, in the City of Pickering to permit the implementation of a draft plan of subdivision; and And whereas an amendment to Zoning By-law 7364/14, is deemed necessary to permit the requested revisions; Now therefore the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as follows: 1. Schedule I Schedule I attached hereto with notations and references shown thereon are hereby declared to be part of this By-law. 2. Area Restricted The provisions of this By-law shall apply to those lands in Part Lots 17 to 19, Concession 4, Part Lots 19 to 21, Concession 5, in the City of Pickering, designated “LD1, LD1-T, OS,” on Schedule I attached hereto. 3. General Provisions No building, structure, land or part thereof shall hereafter be used, occupied, erected, moved or structurally altered except in conformity with the provisions of this By-law. 4. By-law 3037 The provisions of By-law 3037 of the City of Pickering, and the associated amendments, are repealed in the areas that are covered by this By-law as shown on Schedule I to this By-law. 5. By-law 7364/14 By-law 7364/14, is hereby further amended only to the extent necessary to give effect to the provisions of this By-law as it applies to the area set out in Schedule I to this By-law. Definitions and subject matters not specifically dealt with in this By-law shall be governed by relevant provisions of By-law 7364/14. - 344 - By-law No. 7838/21 Page 2 6. Effective Date This By-law shall come into force in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. By-law passed this 26th day of April, 2021. ___________________________________ David Ryan, Mayor ___________________________________ Susan Cassel, City Clerk - 345 - Fifth Concession Road Sideline 16OS LD1-TOS LD1-T LD1 OSClerk Mayor Schedule I to By-Law Passed This Day of i N7838/21 26th April 2021 68.0 m 68.0m 135.2m 97.6m211.3m165.1m133.3m150.6m63.6m57.3m63.6m82.0m 29.0m 50.7m64.6m 27.0m 82.7m 71.5m 736.0m678.2m51.8m 73.4m 53.8m- 346 - Memo To: Susan Cassel April 21, 2021 City Clerk From: Catherine Rose Chief Planner Copy: Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Subject: Amending By-law for Official Plan Amendment OPA 20-005/P Mattamy (Seaton) Limited Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 3, Now Parts 1 and 2, 40R-24268 and Part of Lot 3, 40R-29614 1034 Reflection Place Amending By-law 7839/21 Statutory Public Meeting Date December 7, 2020 Planning & Development Committee Date April 6, 2021 Purpose and Effect of By-law To adopt Amendment 42 to reduce the minimum net residential density from 203 to 70 units per net hectare for the lands located on the southwest corner of Taunton Road and Sapphire Drive to allow a residential condominium development to be approved. Council Meeting Date April 26, 2021 Note On April 6, 2021, the Planning & Development Committee endorsed staff’s recommendation that the draft by-law to adopt Amendment 42 to the Pickering Official Plan as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN 19-21 be forwarded to Council for enactment. TB:ld j:\planning\Documents\Development\D-3100\2020\OPA 20-005, A009-20\4. Letters\7. Memo to Clerks - OPA\Draft By-law Chart Memo to Clerks.docx Attachments By-law Text By-law Schedules A, B and C Original Signed By Catherine Rose - 347 - The Corporation of the City of Pickering By-law No. 7839/21 Being a By-law to adopt Amendment 42 to the Official Plan for the City of Pickering (OPA 20-005/P) Whereas pursuant to the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.p. 13, subsection 17(22) and 21(1), the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering may, by by-law, adopt amendments to the Official Plan for the City of Pickering; And whereas pursuant to Section 17(10) of the Planning Act, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing has by order authorized Regional Council to pass a by-law to exempt proposed area municipal official plan amendments from its approval; And whereas on February 23, 2000, Regional Council passed By-law 11/2000 which allows the Region to exempt proposed area municipal official plan amendments form its approval; And whereas the Region has advised that Amendment 42 to the City of Pickering Official Plan is exempt from Regional approval; Now therefore the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as follows: 1.That Amendment 42 to the Official Plan for the City of Pickering, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, is hereby adopted; 2.That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward to the Regional Municipality of Durham the documentation required by Procedure: Area Municipal Official Plans and Amendments. 3.This By-law shall come into force and take effect on the day of the final passing hereof. By-law passed this 26th day of April, 2021. ___________________________________ David Ryan, Mayor ___________________________________ Susan Cassel, City Clerk - 348 - Exhibit “A” to By-law 7839/21 Amendment 42 to the City of Pickering Official Plan - 349 - Amendment 42 to the Pickering Official Plan Purpose: The purpose of this amendment is to delete the Gateway Site Symbol on the lands located at the southwest corner of Taunton Road and Sapphire Drive, and to reduce the minimum density requirements for lands designated Mixed Corridor Type 1 and Type 2 within the Lamoreaux Neighbourhood to facilitate a residential townhouse condominium development containing a total of 74 units. This amendment also includes revisions to certain policies within the Thompson’s Corners Neighbourhood on lands designated Mixed Corridor Type 2 and Community Node, and identified as Gateway Sites to ensure the population and density targets are met while providing for a mix of housing forms and tenure within the Seaton Neighbourhood. Location: The site-specific amendment affects the lands located in the: i)southwest quadrant of Taunton Road West and Sapphire Drive, north of Reflection Place and east of the Natural Heritage System; and, ii)northwest corner of Brock Road and Whitevale Road/Alexander Knox; the lands on the west side of Brock Road, first intersection north of Whitevale Road; the lands on the east side of Brock Road, north and south of the Pedestrian Predominant Street, and the development block fronting Sideline 16 and the Fifth Concession Road. Basis: Through the review of Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 20-005/P, City Council is satisfied that the Official Plan Amendment facilitates a residential development containing innovative sustainable features includes geothermal heating and cooling, solar panels, charging station for electric vehicles, and permeable pavers for lands located within the Lamoreaux Neighbourhood 16. Further, the reduction in the number of residential units in Neighbourhood 16 is offset by an increase in density in the Thompson’s Corners Neighbourhood 20. The Amendment is consistent with the policies of the Provincial Policy Statement 2020 and conforms to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and the Durham Regional Official Plan. Actual The City of Pickering Official Plan is hereby amended by: Amendment: (New text is shown as underlined text, deleted text is shown as strikeout text, and retained text is shown as unchanged text.) 1.Revising Schedule VII – Neighbourhood 16: Lamoreaux Neighbourhood by deleting the Gateway Site symbol from the southwest quadrant of Taunton Road West and Sapphire Drive, north of Reflection Place and east of the Natural Heritage System as illustrated on Schedule “A” attached to this Amendment. - 350 - Amendment 42 to the Pickering Official Plan Page 2 2.Revising Schedule XII – Neighbourhood 20: Thompson’s Corners Neighbourhood Plan by deleting the Gateway Site symbol from the northwest corner of Fifth Concession Road and Brock Road and identify two new Gateway Sites on the lands on the west side of Brock Road, north of Whitevale Road, as illustrated on Schedule “B” attached to this Amendment. 3.Revising Schedule XII – Neighbourhood 20: Thompson’s Corners Neighbourhood Plan by adding two new Gateway Sites on the east side of Brock Road, north and south of the pedestrian predominant street as illustrated on Schedule “C” attached to this Amendment. 4.Revising City Policy 12.18 (j) (iii) Lamoreaux Neighbourhood Policies, in Chapter 12 – Urban Neighbourhoods, by reducing the minimum total number of units for lands designated as Mixed Corridor Type 1 and Mixed Corridor Type 2 located west of Sideline 24, north of the hydro corridor, and south of Taunton Road from 530 to 385, as follows: “(iii) the minimum total number of units in the Mixed Corridor Type 1 and Mixed Corridor Type 2 designations located west of Sideline 24, north of the hydro corridor, and south of Taunton Road shall not be less than 530 385 units;” 5.Revising City Policy 12.18 (j) (v) Lamoreaux Neighbourhood Policies, in Chapter 12 – Urban Neighbourhoods, by reducing the minimum total number of units for lands designated Mixed Corridor Type 1 and Mixed Corridor Type 2 located north of the pipeline west of Sideline 24 and south of Taunton Road from 470 to 323, as follows: “(v) the single detached dwellings in the Mixed Corridor Type 1 designation located south of the gas pipeline will not be constructed until related zoning for a detailed development proposal has been approved by the City which will establish a requirement for a minimum of 470 323 units within the Mixed Corridor Type 1 and Mixed Corridor Type 2 designations located north of the pipeline, west of Sideline 24 and south of Taunton Road; and” 6.Revising City Policy 12.22 (a) (i) (A) Thompson’s Corners Neighbourhood Policies, in Chapter 12 – Urban Neighbourhoods, by adding permission for townhomes for lands designated Low Density Area Type 1, as follows: “(A) a full range of unit types within the permitted density range for Low Density Area as per Section 11.2, but consisting predominantly of single, and semi-detached, and townhouse housing forms” 7.Revising City Policy 12.22 (d) and 12.22 (d) (i), Thompson’s Corners Neighbourhood Policies, in Chapter 12 – Urban Neighbourhoods, by permitting Gateway Sites on lands designated Mixed Corridor Type 2 and Community Node, at a higher minimum and maximum density than the underlying densities identified within Chapter 3 – Land Use Table 6: Mixed use Areas: Densities and Floor Areas by Subcategory, as follows: “(d) shall, as per Section 11.6, identify Gateway Sites within the Mixed Corridors Type 2 and Community Node, which shall: - 351 - Amendment 42 to the Pickering Official Plan Page 3 (i)be reserved for apartment buildings at or near the highest density and height permission despite the underlying densities in Mixed Corridor Type 2 and Community Node, the minimum density of 170 units per hectare and maximum density of 250 units per hectare;” Implementation: The provisions set forth in the City of Pickering Official Plan, as amended, regarding the implementation of the Plan shall apply in regard to this Amendment. Interpretation: The provisions set forth in the City of Pickering Official Plan, as amended, regarding the interpretation of the Plan shall apply in regard to this Amendment. OPA 20-005/P A 09/20 Mattamy (Seaton) Limited - 352 - City of Pickering City Development Department © February, 2021 This Map Forms Part of Edition 8 of the Pickering Ofiicial Plan and Must Be Read in Conjunction with the Other Schedules and the Text. Schedule ‘A’ to Amendment 42 Existing Schedule VIII - Neighbourhood 16: Lamoreaux Extract of Schedule VIII to the Pickering Official Plan N Delete Gateway Site Symbol Edition 8 Land Use Structure - 353 - City of Pickering City Development Department © February, 2021 This Map Forms Part of Edition 8 of the Pickering Ofiicial Plan and Must Be Read in Conjunction with the Other Schedules and the Text. Schedule ‘B’ to Amendment 42 Existing Schedule XII - Neighbourhood 20: Thompson’s Corners Extract of Schedule XII to the Pickering Official Plan N Delete Gateway Site Symbol Add Gateway Site Symbol Edition 8 Land Use Structure - 354 - City of Pickering City Development Department © February, 2021 This Map Forms Part of Edition 8 of the Pickering Ofiicial Plan and Must Be Read in Conjunction with the Other Schedules and the Text. Schedule ‘C’ to Amendment 42 Existing Schedule XII - Neighbourhood 20: Thompson’s Corners Extract of Schedule XII to the Pickering Official Plan NLand Use Structure Site Symbol Add Gateway Site Symbol Add Gateway Edition 8 Delete Gateway Site Symbol - 355 - Memo To: Susan Cassel April 21, 2021 City Clerk From: Catherine Rose Chief Planner Copy: Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Subject: Amending By-law for Zoning By-law Amendment A 09/20 Mattamy (Seaton) Limited Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 3, Now Parts 1 and 2, 40R-24268 and Part of Lot 3, 40R-29614 1034 Reflection Place Amending By-law 7840/21 Statutory Public Meeting Date December 7, 2020 Planning & Development Committee Date April 6, 2021 Purpose and Effect of By-law To permit a residential condominium development consisting of 74 townhouse units for the lands located on the southwest corner of Taunton Road and Sapphire Drive. Council Meeting Date April 26, 2021 Note On April 6, 2021, the Planning & Development Committee endorsed staff’s recommendation that the site-specific zoning provisions, containing the standards set out in Appendix II to Report PLN 19-21 be forwarded to Council for enactment. TB:ld j:\planning\Documents\Development\D-3100\2020\OPA 20-005, A009-20\4. Letters\7. Memo to Clerks - OPA\Draft By-law Chart Memo to Clerks.docx Attachments By-law Text By-law Schedule I Original Signed By Catherine Rose - 356 - The Corporation of the City of Pickering By-law No. 7840/21 Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 7364/14, as amended, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham, in Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 3, Now Parts 1 and 2, 40R-24268 and Part of Lot 3, 40R-29614, in the City of Pickering. (A 09/20) Whereas the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering received an application to rezone the subject lands being Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 3, Now Parts 1 and 2, 40R-24268 and Part of Lot 3, 40R-29614 in the City of Pickering to permit a residential condominium development; And whereas an amendment to By-law 7364/14, as amended, is therefore deemed necessary; Now therefore the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as follows: 1. Schedule I Schedule I attached hereto with notations and references shown thereon is hereby declared to be part of this By-law. 2. Area Restricted The provisions of this By-law shall apply to those lands in Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 3, Now Parts 1 and 2, 40R-24268 and Part of Lot 3, 40R-29614, in the City of Pickering, designated “MC2” on Schedule I attached hereto. 3. General Provisions No building, structure, land or part thereof shall hereafter be used, occupied, erected, moved or structurally altered except in conformity with the provisions of this By-law. 4. Text Amendment Revise the first row of Exception Table 20 which establishes the Lot and Building and Structure Exceptions that apply to the Mixed Use Zones by deleting the MC3 Zone and amending the minimum number of dwelling units from 470 to 267 so it reads as follows: - 357 - By-law No. 7840/21 Page 2 Table 20: Lot and Building and Structure Exceptions Zone # Address Description of Special Provision MC1 MC2 2 1 SP-2009-13, South of Taunton Road west of Sideline 24, north of the pipeline The minimum number of dwelling units: 267 units 5. Text Amendment Insert a new row after row one within Exception Table 20 which establishes the Lot and Building and Structure Exceptions that apply to the Mixed Use Zones as follows: Zone # Address Description of Special Provision MC2 1 Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 3, Now Parts 1 and 2, 40R- 24268 and Part of Lot 3, 40R-29614 Building, Multiple Attached means a building containing three or more dwelling units, and may contain some of the dwelling units accessed directly from the outside. Building, Block Townhouse or Block Townhouse Building means a building or structure that is vertically and/or horizontally divided into a minimum of three dwelling units, each of which has an independent entrance from grade to the front and rear of the building, and each of which are divided vertically and/or horizontally above grade by a common wall adjoining dwelling units or a private garage above grade and where all dwelling units are located on one lot and accessed from a private street, laneway or common condominium driveway. Park, Private means an area of land not under the jurisdiction of a public authority that is designed or maintained for active or passive recreational purposes. - 358 - By-law No. 7840/21 Page 3 Zone # Address Description of Special Provision Minimum number of dwelling units: 74 units. Minimum Front Yard: NR. Maximum Front Yard: 5.5 m. Minimum Rear Yard: NR. Minimum Front Landscaped Open Space: NR. Minimum Park, Private: 95 m². Maximum Building Height for Block, Townhouse Building: 16 m Section 3.5 b) and c) shall not apply. 6. By-law 7364/14 By-law 7364/14, as amended, is hereby further amended only to the extent necessary to give effect to the provisions of this By-law as it applies to the area set out in Schedule I attached hereto. Definitions and subject matters not specifically dealt with in this By-law shall be governed by relevant provisions of By-law 7364/14, as amended. 7. Effective Date This By-law shall come into force in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. By-law passed this 26th day of April, 2021. ___________________________________ David Ryan, Mayor ___________________________________ Susan Cassel, City Clerk - 359 - MC2 Taunton Road Sapphire DriveSilk Street Reflection Place Hollow Oak MewsToffee StreetElmcreek MewsClerk Mayor i N7840/21Schedule I to By-Law Passed This 26th Day of April 2021 71.0m 69.7m156.0m148.1m 18.5m4.3m 18. 1 m - 360 - Memo To: Susan Cassel April 21, 2021 City Clerk From: Catherine Rose Chief Planner Copy: Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Subject: Amending By-law for Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 13/19 10046043 Canada Inc. & C. Wang Lots 14, 29 and 30, Part of Lots 22 to 26 Plan 818, Part 4 of 40R-29018, Part 1 of 40R-29545, Part 2 of 40R-30489 and Part 1 of 40R-30492 (1950 and 1952 Fairport Road) Amending By-law 7841/21 Statutory Public Meeting Date January 13, 2020 Planning & Development Committee Date April 6, 2021 Purpose and Effect of By-law To facilitate a residential common element condominium development consisting of 27 detached dwellings and 3 lots for detached dwellings fronting Fairport Road, on lands located on the west side of Fairport Road, south of Taplin Drive. Council Meeting Date April 26, 2021 Note Please refer to the Memorandum from the Director, City Development & CBO to the Chief Administrative Officer, dated April 21, 2021. This Memorandum will be distributed as CAO Correspondence and will be made available as supplementary information for the Council Agenda. TB:ld J:\Documents\Development\D-3200\2019\SP-2019-03, CP-2019-04 & A 13-19\3. Letters\12-By-law Chart Memo to Clerks.docx Attachments By-law Text By-law Schedule I Original Signed By Catherine Rose - 361 - The Corporation of the City of Pickering By-law No.7841/21 Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 3036, as amended, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham, in Lots 14, 29 and 30, Part of Lots 22 to 26 Plan 818, Part 4 of 40R-29018, Part 1 of 40R-29545, Part 2 of 40R-30489 and Part 1 of 40R-30492, in the City of Pickering. (A 13/19) Whereas the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering received an application to rezone the subject lands being Lots 14, 29 and 30, Part of Lots 22 to 26 Plan 818, Part 4 of 40R-29018, Part 1 of 40R-29545, Part 2 of 40R-30489 and Part 1 of 40R-30492 in the City of Pickering to permit 3 freehold lots for detached dwellings and a common element condominium development consisting of 27 detached dwellings; And whereas an amendment to By-law 3036, as amended, is therefore deemed necessary; Now therefore the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as follows: 1. Schedule I Schedule I attached hereto with notations and references shown thereon is hereby declared to be part of this By-law. 2. Area Restricted The provisions of this By-law shall apply to those lands in Lots 14, 29 and 30, Part of Lots 22 to 26 Plan 818, Part 4 of 40R-29018, Part 1 of 40R-29545, Part 2 of 40R-30489 and Part 1 of 40R-30492, in the City of Pickering, designated “S3-17”, “R4-23” and “OS-HL” on Schedule I to this By-law. 3. General Provisions No building, structure, land or part thereof shall hereafter be used, occupied, erected, moved or structurally altered except in conformity with the provisions of this By-law. 4. Definitions In this By-law, (1) “Air Conditioner” means any mechanical equipment which is required for residential use and must be installed outdoors including central air conditioning units, heat pumps, heat exchange units, emergency generators and other such equipment. (2) “Balcony” means an attached covered or uncovered platform projecting from the face of an exterior wall, including above a porch, which is only directly accessible from within a building, usually surrounded by a balustrade or railing, and does not have direct exterior access to grade. - 362 - By-law No. 7841/21 Page 2 (3) “Basement” means a portion of a building below the first storey. (4) “Bay, Bow, Box Window” means a window that protrudes from the main wall, usually bowed, canted, polygonal, segmental, semicircular or square sided with window on front face in plan; one or more storeys in height, which may or may not include a foundation; may or may not include a window seat; and may include a door. (5) “Condominium, Common Element” means spaces and features owned in common by all stakeholders in a condominium and may include private streets, walkways and parking and amenity areas. (6) “Deck” means a raised platform attached to the exterior wall of a building and with direct access from within a building and from grade. (7) “Grade” or “Established Grade” means, when used with reference to a building, the average elevation of the finished surface of the ground where it meets the exterior of the front of such building and when used with reference to a structure shall mean the average elevation of the finished surface of the ground immediately surrounding such structure, exclusive in both cases of any artificial embankment. (8) “Parapet Wall” means the portion of an exterior wall extending above the roof. (9) “Porch” means a roofed deck or portico structure attached to the exterior wall of a building, a basement may be located under the porch. (10) "Private Garage" means an enclosed or partially enclosed structure for the storage of one or more vehicles, in which structure no business or service is conducted for profit or otherwise; (11) “Street, Private” means: (a) a right-of-way or roadway that is used by vehicles and is maintained by a condominium corporation; (b) a private road condominium, which provides access to individual freehold lots; (c) a roadway maintained by a corporation to provide vehicular and pedestrian access to parking lots and individual retail/commercial units; (d) a private right-of-way over private property, that affords access to lots abutting the private street, but is not maintained by a public body and is not a lane. (12) “Wall, Front” means a primary exterior wall of a building, not including permitted projections, which contains the primary entrance door. - 363 - By-law No. 7841/21 Page 3 (13) “Water Meter Building” means a building or structure that contains devices supplied by the Region of Durham which measures the quantity of water delivered to a property. (14) (a) "Front Yard Depth" means the shortest horizontal dimension of a front yard of a lot between the front lot line and the nearest wall of the nearest main building or structure on the lot; (b) "Rear Yard Depth" means the shortest horizontal dimension of a rear yard of a lot between the rear lot line of the lot, or where there is no rear lot line, the junction point of the side lot lines, and the nearest wall of the nearest main building or structure on the lot; (c) "Side Yard Width" means the shortest horizontal dimension of a side yard of a lot between the side lot line and the nearest wall of the nearest main building or structure on the lot; (d) "Flankage Side Yard Width" means the shortest horizontal dimension of a flankage side yard of a lot between the lot line adjoining a street or abutting on a reserve on the opposite side of which is a street, and the nearest wall of the nearest main building or structure on the lot. 5. Provisions (1) (a) Uses Permitted (“S3-17” and “R4-23” Zone) No person shall within the lands designated “S3-17” and “R4-23” on Schedule I attached hereto, use any lot or erect, alter, or use any building or structure for any purpose except the following (i) Detached dwelling (b) Zone Requirements (“S3-17” and “R4-23” Zone) No person shall within the lands designated “S3-17” and “R4-23” on Schedule I attached hereto use any lot or erect, alter or use any building except in accordance with the following provisions: “S3-17” Zone “R4-23” Zone (i) Lot Area (minimum) 350 square metres 430 square metres (ii) Lot Frontage (minimum) 12.0 metres 13.5 metres (iii) Front Yard Depth (minimum) 4.5 metres 7.5 metres - 364 - By-law No. 7841/21 Page 4 “S3-17” Zone “R4-23” Zone (iv) Side Yard Width (minimum) 1.2 metres, and 0.6 of a metre on the other side 1.5 metres (v) Flankage Side Yard Width (minimum) 3.0 metres 4.5 metres (vi) Rear Yard Depth (minimum) 7.5 metres (vii) Building Height (maximum) 9.0 metres (viii) Lot Coverage (maximum) 38 percent 33 percent (ix) Parking Requirements (minimum) A minimum of 2 residential parking spaces per dwelling unit, one of which must be provided within an attached private garage, and 0.25 visitor parking spaces per dwelling unit A minimum of 2 residential parking spaces per dwelling unit, one of which must be provided within an attached private garage (x) Driveway Width (maximum) Maximum driveway width shall not exceed the width of the exterior walls of the private garage (xi) Garage Requirements Minimum one private garage per lot attached to the main building, the vehicular entrance of which shall be located not less than 6 metres from the front lot line (l) Interior Garage Size (minimum) Each parking space within a private garage shall have a minimum width of 3.0 metres and a minimum depth of 6.0 metres provided; however, the width may include one interior step and the depth may include two interior steps (m) Garage Projection A maximum of 1.5 metres projection beyond the wall containing the main entrance to the dwelling unit - 365 - By-law No. 7841/21 Page 5 (2) Special Provisions (“S3-17” and “R4-23” Zone) (a) Projections such as window silts, chimney breasts, fireplaces, belt courses, cornices, plasters, eaves, eave troughs and other similar architectural features may be permitted in any required yard, provided that no such feature projects into the required yard more than 0.6 of a metre or half the distance of the required yard, whichever is less; (b) Porches and associated stairs not exceeding 1.5 metres in height above established grade may encroach a maximum of 2.0 metres into the required front yard. (c) Decks and associated stairs not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade may encroach a maximum of 2.0 metres into the required rear yard provided they are setback 0.6 of a metre from a side lot line; (d) A bay, box or bow window, with or without foundations, having a maximum width of 4.0 metres may encroach into any required yard to a maximum of 0.6 of a metre or half the distance of the required yard, whichever is less; (e) Air conditioners are permitted on a lot provided they are located in the rear yard or side yard or on a balcony or roof. In addition, such units shall not be located any closer than 0.6 of a metre to a side lot line and shall not be located on any easement in favour of the City; (f) Despite any front yard depth, rear yard depth or flankage side yard width requirement; on a corner lot, the setback to a corner rounding at the front, rear, side or flankage of a lot shall be 2.5 metres; (g) A water meter building required by the Region of Durham for the purpose of measuring the quantity of water delivered shall be exempt from “S3-17” and “R4-23” zone use provisions and zone requirements. 6. Provisions (1) (a) Uses Permitted (“OS-HL” Zone) No person shall within the lands designated “OS-HL” on Schedule I attached hereto, use any lot or erect, alter, or use any building or structure for any purpose except the following: (i) Preservation and conservation of the natural environmental, soil and wildlife. - 366 - By-law No. 7841/21 Page 6 (b) Zone Requirements (“OS-HL” Zone) (i) No buildings or structures shall be permitted to be erected nor shall the placing or removal of fill be permitted, except where buildings or structures are used only for purposes of flood and erosion control, resource management, or pedestrian and/or bicycle trails. 7. By-law 3036 By-law 3036, as amended, is hereby further amended only to the extent necessary to give effect to the provisions of this By-law as it applies to the area set out in Schedule I attached hereto. Definitions and subject matters not specifically dealt with in this By-law shall be governed by relevant provisions of By-law 3036, as amended. 8. Effective Date This By-law shall come into force in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. By-law passed this 26th day of April, 2021. ___________________________________ David Ryan, Mayor ___________________________________ Susan Cassel, City Clerk - 367 - Fairport RoadGlenanna Road Taplin Drive S3-17 R4-23 OS-HL 17 . 9 m 18 . 1m27.7m29.4 m 3 3 . 2m36.2m45.3m Clerk Mayor i N7841/21Schedule I to By-Law Passed This 26th Day of April 202188.2m56.1m71.9m73.5m 46.1m28.9m43.2m15.2m10.3m43.2m31.9m 32.1m 64.0m 67.0m97.0m 0.3m 23.1m 29.0m - 368 - Memo To: Susan Cassel April 21, 2021 City Clerk From: Catherine Rose Chief Planner Copy: Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Amending By-law for Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 03/21 City Initiated 5015 Brock Road City of Pickering Amending By-law 7842/21 Statutory Public Meeting Date March 1, 2021 Planning & Development Committee Date April 6, 2021 Purpose and Effect of By-law To correct a mapping error within Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06, to reinstate the zone designation for 5015 Brock Road to that which existed prior to the passing of By-law 6640/06, thus restoring the residential use rights of a maximum 4 dwelling units on the lands and required parking provisions. Council Meeting Date April 26, 2021 Note The Recommendation Report and By-law were brought forward to Planning & Development Committee on April 6, 2021. The By-law has been revised to repeal By-law 6525/05. IL:ld J:\Documents\Development\D-3300\2021\A 03-21\10. By-law\By-law Chart Memo to Clerks A 03-21.docx Attachments By-law Text By-law Schedule Original Signed By Catherine Rose - 369 - The Corporation of the City of Pickering By-law No. 7842/21 Being a by-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06 to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham for land at Part of Lot 18, Concession 9 S, Part of Lot 2, Plan 12, in the City of Pickering. (A 03/21) Whereas the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering initiated an application to rezone the subject lands being Part of Lot 18, Concession 9 S, Part of Lot 2, Plan 12 in the City of Pickering to restore the residential use rights of a maximum of 4 dwelling units that existed prior to the passing of By-law 6640/06; And whereas an amendment to By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06, is deemed necessary to reinstate the residential use rights; Now therefore the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as follows: 1. Schedule I Schedule I attached hereto with notations and references shown thereon is hereby declared to be part of this By-law. 2. Area Restricted The provisions of this By-law shall apply to those lands in Part of Lot 18, Concession 9 S, Part of Lot 2, Plan 12, in the City of Pickering, designated “ORM-C2-1” on Schedule I attached hereto. 3. General Provisions No building, structure, land or part thereof shall hereafter be used, occupied, erected, moved or structurally altered except in conformity with the provisions of this By-law. 4. Repeal of By-law Upon this By-law being in force and effect, By-law 6525/05 is hereby repealed. - 370 - By-law No. 7842/21 Page 2 5. By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06 By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06, is hereby further amended only to the extent necessary to give effect to the provisions of this By-law as it applies to the area set out in Schedule I to this By-law. Definitions and subject matters not specifically dealt with in this By-law shall be governed by relevant provisions of By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06. 6. Effective Date This By-law shall come into force in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. By-law passed this 26th day of April, 2021. ________________________________ David Ryan, Mayor ________________________________ Susan Cassel, City Clerk - 371 - ORM-C2-1 Dow StreetBrock RoadCentral Street Wixson StreetHenry Street Clerk Mayor Schedule I to By-Law Passed This Day of i N7842/2125.6m40.3m 40.0m 25.2m26th April 2021 - 372 - PB:ca Attachments Location Map Draft By-law Memo To: Susan Cassel City Clerk April 20, 2021 From: Paul Bigioni Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor Copy: Director, City Development & CBO Subject: Request for Part Lot Control By-law - Owner: Grossi Group Building Corporation Inc. - Block 17, 40M-1827 File: PLC.40M-1827.17 The above-mentioned block is being developed in accordance with the appropriate agreement, zoning by-law and common elements condominium plan in such a manner to allow the construction of 27 dwelling units. Attached is a location map and a draft by-law, enactment of which will exempt this block from the part lot control provisions of the Planning Act thus allowing 27 units to be created on parcels of tied lands (‘POTLs’) and the transfer of those POTLs into separate ownership. The draft by-law is attached for the consideration of City Council at its meeting scheduled for April 26, 2021. - 373 - The Corporation of the City of Pickering By-law No. 7843/21 Being a by-law to exempt Block 17, Plan 40M-1827, Pickering, from the part lot control provisions of the Planning Act. Whereas pursuant to the provisions of section 50(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13, as amended, the Council of a municipality may by by-law provide that section 50(5) of the Act does not apply to certain lands within a plan of subdivision designated in the by-law; And Whereas Grossi Group Building Corporation Inc., the owner of Block 17, Plan 40M-1827, intends to obtain approval of, and register, a common elements condominium plan on the lands; and And Whereas the proposed common elements condominium plan is to consist of 27 residential dwelling units; and And Whereas it is intended that the owner or owners of each of the 27 dwelling units will own the parcel of tied land on which his, her or their dwelling is located, in fee simple and will also be a member or members of the common elements condominium corporation; and And Whereas it is intended that the parcels of tied lands on which the 27 dwelling units are to be constructed will be subdivided by means of an exemption from the part lot control provisions of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13. Now therefore the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as follows: 1.Section 50(5) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13, shall cease to apply to Block 17, Plan 40M-1827, upon: (a)registration of this By-law in the Land Registry Office for the Land Titles Division of Durham (No. 40); and (b)registration of a restriction, pursuant to Section 118 of the Land Titles Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter L.5, requiring the consent of the Solicitor for The Corporation of the City of Pickering, or his designate, to the registration of any transfer or charge of any portion of Block 17, Plan 40M-1827 or any part or parts thereof, in the Land Registry Office for the Land Titles Division of Durham (No. 40). - 374 - By-law No. 7843/21 Page 2 2.This By-law shall remain in force and effect for a period of two (2) years from the date of the passing of this By-law and shall expire on April 26, 2023. By-law passed this 26th day of April, 2021. ________________________________ David Ryan, Mayor ________________________________ Susan Cassel, City Clerk - 375 - - 376 - Memo To: Susan Cassel City Clerk April 20, 2021 From: Paul Bigioni Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor Copy: Director, City Development & CBO Subject: Request for Part Lot Control By-law -Owner: Icon Forest District Limited - Block 1, Plan 40M-2692 File: PLC40M2692 The above-mentioned block is being developed in accordance with the appropriate Agreements, Zoning By-law and Common Elements Condominium Plan in such a manner as to allow the construction of 108 townhouse dwelling units (parcels of tied lands). Attached is a location map and a draft by-law, enactment of which will exempt Block 1 from the part lot control provisions of the Planning Act thus allowing the 108 townhouse dwelling units to be created on parcels of tied lands (‘potls’) and the transfer of those potls into separate ownership. The draft by-law is attached for the consideration of City Council at its meeting scheduled for April 26, 2021. PB:ca Attachments Location Map Draft By-law - 377 - The Corporation of the City of Pickering By-law No. 7844/21 Being a by-law to exempt Block 1, Plan 40M-2692, Pickering, from the part lot control provisions of the Planning Act. Whereas pursuant to the provisions of section 50(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13, as amended, the Council of a municipality may by by-law provide that section 50(5) of the Act does not apply to certain lands within a plan of subdivision designated in the by-law; And W hereas Icon Forest District Limited, the owner of Block 1, Plan 40M-2692, intends to obtain approval of, and register a common elements condominium plan on the said lands; And Whereas the proposed common elements condominium plan is to consist of 108 residential dwelling units; And W hereas it is intended that the owner or owners of each of the 108 dwelling units will own the parcel of tied land on which his, her or their dwelling is located, in fee simple and will also be a member or members of the common elements condominium corporation; And Whereas it is intended that the parcels of tied lands on which the 108 dwellings are to be constructed will be subdivided by means of an exemption from the part lot control provisions of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13. Now therefore the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as follows: 1.Section 50(5) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13, shall cease to apply to Block 1, Plan 40M-2692, upon: (a)registration of this By-law in the Land Registry Office for the Land Titles Division of Durham (No. 40); and (b)registration of a restriction, pursuant to Section 118 of the Land Titles Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter L.5, requiring the consent of the Solicitor for The Corporation of the City of Pickering to the registration of any transfer or charge of any portion of Block 1, Plan 40M-2692, in the Land Registry Office for the Land Titles Division of Durham (No. 40). - 378 - By-law No. 7844/21 Page 2 2.This By-law shall remain in force and effect for a period of two years from the date of the passing of this By-law and shall expire on April 26, 2023. By-law passed this 26th day of April, 2021. ________________________________ David Ryan, Mayor ________________________________ Susan Cassel, City Clerk - 379 - Finch Avenue Nature HavenCrescentShadow Place Mapleview CourtAltona Road1:4,000 SCALE: © The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: © Queens Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; © Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers all rights reserved.; © Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its suppliers all rights reserved.; City Development Department Location Map File: Applicant: Property Description: Part Lot Control THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. Date: Mar. 16, 2021 ¯ Icon Forest District Limited Block 1, 40M2692 L:\PLANNING\01-MapFiles\Legal\Part Lot Control\PartLotControl_40M2692.mxd PN-6 Block 140M2692 - 380 -