Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
March 2, 2020
City 6h DICKERING Planning & Development Committee Meeting Agenda March 2, 2020 Council Chambers — 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner Page 1. Disclosure of Interest 2. Statutory Public Meetings Statutory Public Meetings are open to the public to receive input and feedback on certain types of planning applications. In accordance with the City's Procedure By-law, anyone wishing to make a delegation before the Committee for an item listed under the Statutory Public Meetings section of the agenda, is not required to register in advance and will be given an opportunity to speak. 2.1 Information Report No. 04-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP -2015-03 (R) Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 05/15 (R) Seaton TFPM Inc. Part Lots 17 to 19, Concession 4, Part Lots 17 to 21, Concession 5 Seaton Community 3. Delegations 1 In accordance with the City's Procedure By-law, individuals who would like to appear as a delegation for any Items not related to Statutory Public Meetings, must register with the City Clerk by 12:00 noon on the day of the meeting. Please visit www.pickerinq.ca/delegation to register. 4. Planning & Development Reports 4.1 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 04-20 The Municipal Comprehensive Review of the Durham Regional Official Plan: Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper, September 2019 Recommendation: 1. a) That the goals for the Environment and Greenlands System in the current Regional Official Plan are still relevant and appropriate; b) That the policy framework where the natural environment and agricultural lands intersect be clarified; and, 16 For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca Cty oh DICKERING Planning & Development Committee Meeting Agenda March 2, 2020 Council Chambers — 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner c) That the Regional Official Plan incorporate a climate change lens recognizing the impact climate change may have on the natural environment and infrastructure; 2. a) That policies be introduced in the Regional Official Plan that promote greater collaboration with conservation authorities respecting the investigation and implementation of mechanisms for the control of invasive species and pests throughout the Region; and, b) That policies be introduced in the Regional Official Plan that promote education programs that help to create an awareness of invasive species and pests present in the Region; 3. That policies that address the matter of excess soil/soil conservation be included in the Regional Official Plan in order that existing drainage patterns are maintained, sedimentation and erosion is mitigated, disturbance of landform characteristics are minimized, groundwater, watercourses and natural heritage features are protected, infrastructure is safeguarded, quality of soils is tested to ensure that human health and the environment is protected, and the impact of fill hauling on residents is mitigated; 4. That, if the Region adds policies in its Official Plan to restrict or limit the land application of septage (which is waste material removed from portable toilets, sewage holding tanks and septic systems), it is not clear what mechanism the Region would have to enforce such policies; 5. That policies regarding ecosystem compensation and valuation be included in the Regional Official Plan in order to address the socio- economic benefits and loss associated with natural heritage and hydrologic features and their functions due to development impacts; 6. a) That the Region consider requesting the Province to make resources available to Indigenous Peoples to facilitate the sharing of Traditional Ecological Knowledge; and, b) That the Region, through a coordinated consultation with the Indigenous communities within the Region, endeavour to provide guidance to local area municipalities in terms of who, and how, these communities can appropriately be consulted; For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca Cty oh DICKERING Planning & Development Committee Meeting Agenda March 2, 2020 Council Chambers — 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner 7. a) That, in the future, the Region provide financial support for the LEAF program (backyard tree planting program), and others as appropriate; and, b) That the Region continue and expand its support for environmental stewardship through financial resource contributions, and by including policy in the Regional Official Plan that encourages participation with local area municipalities, conservation authorities and others as appropriate; 8. That the Region continue to use the "Major Open Space" designation on non -prime agricultural lands, in the new Regional Official Plan; 9. a) That, since each "Waterfront Places" location within Durham is unique, the designation and delineation of Waterfront Places be dealt with as a local planning matter, similar to the approach for Local Centres; and, b) That the Waterfront Places symbols be removed from the Regional Official Plan, and that local municipalities be provided with greater discretion regarding the identification of areas for growth, and the distribution and density of development within their municipalities; 10. a) That an Open Space Linkages designation continue to be identified in the Regional Official Plan for the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor in Pickering, as it represents an east -west corridor for flora and fauna, as well as the location for trails for the movement of people; b) That the Region include policies that address the preparation of a "Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor Management Plan" and establishes funding for ongoing maintenance and restoration of the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor in the Regional Official Plan; and, c) That the Waterfront Link north of the Pickering Nuclear Generating Station continue to be identified in the Regional Official Plan in recognition of its importance as an east -west For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca Cty oh DICKERING Planning & Development Committee Meeting Agenda March 2, 2020 Council Chambers — 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner corridor for flora and fauna, as well as for the movement of people; 11. a) That policies be included in the Regional Official Plan that establish separate tree canopy targets for urban and rural areas, following the identification of the current baseline; and, b) That the implementation of Regional Road tree planting be assumed by the Region to demonstrate their partnership in improving the tree canopy; 12. That if the Region decides to include targets for other natural heritage and hydrologic features in addition to woodlands in the Regional Official Plan, they consult with the conservation authorities and other appropriate experts; 13. That the Region leave it to the local area municipalities to include the more detailed policies prescribing minimum vegetation protection zones in their official plans; 14. a) That the Region adopt an "overlay" approach to identifying where key natural heritage and key hydrologic features form a component of the Natural Heritage System at the regional level; b) That appropriate policy language be included to allow for adjustments to the overlay where it is deemed appropriate by lower -tier municipalities in consultation with their conservation authorities through various means, such as site specific environmental impact studies, without the need for amendments to the Regional Official Plan; and, c) That the Region have an upper -tier level Natural Heritage System that primarily reflects the Provincial Natural Heritage System, and encourage area municipalities to maintain their own established natural heritage systems; 15. a) That, in considering policies and/or mapping related to wildland fire hazards, the Region identify areas of potential for hazardous forest types for wildland fire as a screening tool to inform development decisions, as well as for awareness and education; and, For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca Cty �l DICKERING Planning & Development Committee Meeting Agenda March 2, 2020 Council Chambers — 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner b) That the Region consider including wildland fire hazard policies in the Regional Official Plan in order to apply a consistent approach to mitigation as well as appropriate mitigation measures; 16. That the Region keep the current policies in the Regional Official Plan that provide guidance on the conveyance of land for natural heritage conservation as they adequately address the matter; 17. That the Region consider implementing policies that provide additional detail regarding the requirements for an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) that include, but are not limited to, the requirement that an EIS describe: • the mitigation, improvement and restoration measures to be used to address the environmental conditions to ensure that the proposed development or site alteration will have no adverse impacts on the natural heritage system or its related ecological functions; • the location and extent of the environmental features and functions that should be preserved; and, • the recommendations for appropriate buffers between the area of development or site alteration; 18. That the Region consider enhancing its definition of "sensitive uses" and including more detailed assessment information within the Regional Official Plan; 19. a) That the Region recognize the following additional sectors as being impacted by climate change: fisheries; finance and insurance; infrastructure; mental health; vulnerable populations; organizational risk management and emergency preparedness; summer recreation; and urban tree canopy health; b) That the Region understand that the City's vision for climate change and adaptation for Durham is a holistic approach based on a framework for sustainability, wherein policies about climate change should address the following objectives: healthy For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca Cty oh DICKERING Planning & Development Committee Meeting Agenda March 2, 2020 Council Chambers — 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Brenner environment; healthy economy; healthy society; responsible development; and responsible consumption; c) That the Region consider implementing policies that address the changing climate and methods, techniques and best practices for adaptation, mitigation and resiliency in the Regional Official Plan; d) That the Region introduce a policy in the Regional Official Plan identifying the advocacy role that it can play in adapting to climate change in collaboration with all levels of government and a wide variety of stakeholders; and, e) That the Region recognize the Rouge National Urban Park and its management objectives in the Regional Official Plan. 5. Other Business 6. Adjournment For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca 64 �f DICKERING Information Report to Planning & Development Committee Report Number: 04-20 Date: March 2, 2020 From: Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Chief Planner Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP -2015-03 (R) Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 05/15 (R) Seaton TFPM Inc. Part Lots 17 to 19, Concession 4, Part Lots 17 to 21, Concession 5 Seaton Community 1. Purpose of this Report The purpose of this report is to provide preliminary information regarding an application for Draft Plans of Subdivision and a Zoning By-law Amendment, submitted by Seaton TFPM Inc., to permit the approval and implementation of a draft plan of subdivision containing a variety of land uses. This report contains general information on the applicable Official Plan and other related policies, and identifies matters raised to date. This report is intended to assist members of the public and other interested stakeholders to understand the proposal. The Planning & Development Committee will hear public delegations on the application, ask questions of clarification, and identify any planning matters. This report is for information and no decision is being made at this time. Staff will bring forward a recommendation report for consideration by the Planning & Development Committee upon completion of a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal. 2. Property Location and Application Description These applications represent all the developable lands in Seaton Neighbourhood 20, Thompson's Corner (see Neighbourhood 20: Thompson's Corner Neighbourhood Plan, Attachment #1). In 2015, Ontario Infrastructure and Land Corporation (OILC) submitted the original applications for zoning by-law amendment and draft plan of subdivision. A Statutory Public Meeting was held on October 5, 2015, for the original applications. In 2018, OILC sold the subject lands to Seaton TFPM Inc., who revised the applications and therefore require a new Statutory Public Meeting. 2.1 Property Description The subject lands consisting of multiple individual parcels located in the northeast quadrant of the Seaton Community. Brock Road acts as a spine for the neighbourhood and the draft plan of subdivision (see Location Map with Submitted Plan, Attachment #2). The subject lands have a total land area of approximately 139 hectares. The Brock Road — Highway 407/ETR interchange is within the Neighbourhood plan but is not part of the subject applications. The Hamlet of Brougham is also not included within the applications. 1 - Information Report No. 04-20 Page 2 The lands are currently used for agricultural/rural activities and open space lands. Surrounding land uses include (see Air Photo Map, Attachment #3): north - the Hamlet of Brougham, and on the north side of Highway 7 are the Federal Airport Lands that currently support agricultural/rural activities south - additional lands owned by the Province designated Seaton Natural Heritage System east - north of the Fifth Concession Road are rural/open space lands, and south of the Fifth Concession Road, in the Town of Ajax, there is a pioneer cemetery and rural uses west - additional lands owned by the Province that are designated Seaton Natural Heritage System, and along the Highway 407/ETR corridor are additional future Employment Lands 2.2 Application Detail The Neighbourhood is considered a complete community given the integration of a diversity of land uses that includes employment, commercial, residential, schools and community facilities (see Location Map with Submitted Plan, Attachment #2). The draft plan of subdivision, as proposed is generally reflective of the land use designations in Neighbourhood 20 of the Official Plan. The draft plan proposes approximately: 34 hectares of Prestige Employment Node; 14 hectares of Prestige Employment General; 7 hectares of Community Node; 10 hectares of Mixed Corridor; 14 hectares of Medium Density Residential; and, 10 hectares of Low Density Residential. The projected number of dwelling units in the draft plan of subdivision is approximately 2,197 units. The Community Node is located along Brock Road, central to the neighbourhood and a Pedestrian Predominant Street runs perpendicular to Brock Road, and forms the spine of the Community Node. The mixed corridor uses are proposed south of the Community Node and along the east and west side of Brock Road, and extending south of Alexander Knox Road (previously know as Whitevale Road) on the east side of Brock Road. Blocks of land for a cluster of community facilities is located on the east side of Brock Road, north of the Fifth Concession Road that are intended for a high school, an elementary school, a neighbourhood park and a recreation centre. The employment lands are located on the north and south side of Highway 407/ETR. The medium density residential development is proposed on the west side of Brock Road, west of the Community Node and mixed corridor uses. The low density residential uses are located south of the Fifth Concession Road, east of Sideline 16 (see Draft Plan of Subdivision SP -2015-03 Proposed Development Details on Attachment #4). 2 Information Report No. 04-20 Page 3 3. Policy Framework 3.1 Central Pickering Development Plan The Central Pickering Development Plan (CPDP) sets out the principles and goals that outline the general development vision for the overall Seaton Urban Area, including the integration of new sustainable urban development while ensuring the protection, maintenance and enhancement of the natural heritage system. The objectives and policies of the CPDP are designed to achieve the vision of Seaton. The subject applications generally conform to the intent of the CPDP. 3.2 Durham Regional Official Plan The Seaton Neighbourhoods fall under `Special Policy Area A (Pickering)', in the Durham Regional Official Plan. The policies state that these lands shall be developed in accordance with the CPDP and implementing Neighbourhood Plans. The design, structure and uses proposed are generally consistent with those permitted in the CPDP and the Neighbourhood Plans. The applications generally comply with the Durham Regional Official Plan 3.3 Pickering Official Plan The subject lands are within the Seaton Urban Area. The Official Plan contains policies governing various land use designations, such as Residential Areas, Mixed Use Areas, Employment Areas, and Open Space System, all of which are located in the draft plan of subdivision. The Official Plan establishes various polices for such matters as density, intensity of land use and sustainability. Chapter 11 of the Official Plan further defines the land use designations as well as establishes polices for such matters as the Seaton Natural Heritage System, cultural heritage, sustainable development, servicing, population targets and urban design (see Official Plan Schedule XII, Neighbourhood 20: Thompson's Corner Neighbourhood Plan, Attachment #1). The Neighbourhood is planned to have a broad range of land use densities, including commercial, and a variety of residential built forms with densities ranging from low medium and mixed use density. The applications will be assessed against the policies and provisions of the Pickering Official Plan during the further processing of the applications 3.3.1 Seaton Sustainable Place -Making Guidelines The Seaton Sustainable Place -Making Guidelines address the urban design guidelines contained within the CPDP and expands upon the key design elements such as setting out minimum standards and benchmarks for plans of subdivision and site plans, and list the range of matters that are to be addressed in the development of the lands. The Guidelines also provide direction on the design of the public realm, built form and green infrastructure and buildings. The applications will be assessed against the policies and provisions of the Seaton Sustainable Place -Making Guidelines during the further processing of the applications. - 3 Information Report No. 04-20 Page 4 3.4 Zoning By-law 3037 The subject lands are zoned "A" — Rural Agricultural Zone under Restricted Area Zoning By-law 3037, as amended, which currently permits a detached dwelling, home occupation, and various agricultural and related uses. Amendments are proposed to delete all of the subject lands from Zoning By-law 3037 and to add these lands to the new Seaton Zoning By-law 7364/14 in order to facilitate the implementation of the draft plans of subdivision. 4. Comments Received 4.1 Statutory Public Meeting of October 5, 2015 A Statutory Pubic Meeting was held on October 5, 2015 on the original application. It is noted that this Statutory Pubic Meeting considered five separate draft plans of subdivision and related zoning amendment applications that were submitted by OILC at the same meeting. The majority of comments provided related to the other four draft plans of subdivisions that were being considered (see Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes, October 5, 2015, Attachment #5). 4.2 Resident Comments As of writing this report, no comments or concerns have been received on the revised applications. 4.3 City Department Comments 4.3.1 Engineering Services As of writing this report, no comments or concerns have been received on the revised applications. 4.4 Agency Comments 4.4.1 Region of Durham As of writing this report, no comments or concerns have been received on the revised applications. 4.4.2 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) As of writing this report, no comments have been received from the TRCA on the revised applications. 4.4.3 Durham Catholic District School Board Durham Catholic District School Board has no objections to the proposal subject to the inclusion of certain draft plan conditions of approval. - 4 - Information Report No. 04-20 Page 5 4.4.4 Durham District School Board As of writing this report, no comments or concerns have been received on the revised applications. 4.4.5 Town of Ajax The Town of Ajax has provided comments on the design of Sideline 16, south of the Fifth Concession Road, being a boundary road, stormwater management matters and the need to appropriately buffer the pioneer cemetery that abuts the draft plan of subdivision. 4.5 Planning & Design Section Comments The following matters have been identified by staff for further review and consideration: • ensuring the applications will implement the City's Official Plan and the Seaton Neighbourhood policies • ensuring the proposal is consistent with the City's urban design goals and objectives in the Seaton Sustainable Place -Making Guidelines • ensuring that the submitted Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report is consistent with the Seaton Master Environmental Servicing Plan to the satisfaction of the Region, the City, and TRCA • ensuring the full range of land uses can be achieved to realize a complete neighbourhood • ensuring heritage assessment for appropriate abutting properties that may be impacted by the development has been undertaken and adverse impacts are appropriately mitigated • ensuring that the proposed development contains appropriate sustainable development components • ensuring that required technical submissions and reports meet City standards • the City Development Department will conclude its position on the applications after it has received and assessed comments from the circulated departments, agencies and the public Further issues may be identified following receipt and review of comments from the circulated departments, agencies and public. The City Development Department will conclude its position on the applications after it has received and assessed comments from the circulated department, agencies and public. 5. Information Received Copies of the plans and studies listed below are available for viewing on the City's website at pickering.ca/devapp or in person at the offices of the City of Pickering, City Development Department: • Draft Plan of Subdivision, prepared by Korsiak Urban Planning, dated October 11, 2019 • Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, prepared by Urbantech, dated November 2019 • Traffic Sensitivity Analysis, prepared by BA Group, dated October 17, 2019 - 5 - Information Report No. 04-20 Page 6 • Preliminary Environmental Noise Assessment, prepared by YCA Engineering Limited, dated October 2019 • Environmental Site Assessment Reports, prepared by Pinchin Ltd, various dates • Planning Justification Report, prepared by Macaulay Shiomi Howson Ltd., dated January 2018 • Urban Design Brief and Sustainability Checklist, prepared by Korsiak Urban Planning, dated October 16, 2019 6. Procedural Information 6.1 General • written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the City Development Department • oral comments may be made at the Statutory Public Meeting • all comments received will be noted and used as input to a Recommendation Report prepared by the City Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Council or a Committee of Council • any member of the public who wishes to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this proposal • any member of the public who wishes to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal must request such in writing to the City Clerk 7. Owner/Applicant Information The owner of the subject lands is Seaton TFPM Inc. (Seaton TFPM Inc. is a consortium of developers being, TACC Development, Fieldgate Homes, Paradise Developments, and Mattamy Homes). Attachments 1. Neighbourhood 20: Thompson's Corner Neighbourhood Plan 2. Location Map with Submitted Plan 3. Air Photo Map 4. Draft Plan of Subdivision SP -2015-03 Proposed Development Details 5. Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes, October 5, 2015 Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: Original Signed By: Original Signed By: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Strategic Initiatives Chief Planner RP:Id Date of Report: February 11, 2020 6 Attachment #1 to Information Report 04-20 Neighbourhood 20: Thompson's Corners ---- IN I r•r SII II Tip IT II I I� ILJL-I IL I N19 INI I g]' I ("MO • • fie_. •• sew N17 `►. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 99. 0................ � 1 �f I� • f �f 71 7 SCHEDULE XII to PICKERING OFFICIAL PLAN Neighbourhood 20: Thompson's Corners Neighbourhood Plan ▪ Seaton Natural Heritage System \..J SWM Facility (' see note below) o Trailineads Terminal Views Community Pardo 0,1!) Neighbourhood Park Village Green ▪ Recreation Centre • District Energy } • Elementary School ` Hign School Low Density Area Type 1 Medium Density Area Mixed Corridor Type 2 Community Node Prestige Employment Node Prestige Employment Gateway Site Future Transltway Station Controlled Access Area Heritage Lo13 1�Y 1 Cemetery Extension C==] Pedestrian Predominant Street Primary Neighbourhood Connecting Trails Primary Recreational Trails SeCundary Recreational Trans Primary Bikeway Secondary Bikeway Local Road in NHS see Section 12.22 (m)(iI). Neighbourhood Boundary. Movement Intersection Ml! T Intersection 0 Right Sri Right Out intersection Nola: The nurturer, size and location M Storm water management Facilities shown on this schedule are conceptual only and are subject to approval as set out In Sedtion 11.73 and secliOn 12.22 (rn (lv) of this Plan. 1 • 9 100 71.1e bog RTMCN Attachment #2 to Information Report 04-20 Legend \\A\ Highway 7 AVV fr 4* ��♦♦♦♦♦e wr Community node Elementary School High School Mixed Corridor 2 Neighbourhood Park Open Space Prestige Employment General Prestige Employment Node Recreation Centre Single Detached Units Stormwater Management Pond Street Townhouse Village Green PHASE Alexander Knox Road PICKERING City Development Departme8 PHASE 2 Fifth Concession Road CT' 0 Location Map with Submitted Plan File: SP -2015-03 & A05/15 Date: Feb. 11, 2020 SCALE:1:12,000 ©The Corporation of the City of Pickenng Produced (in part) under license bom: 0 Queens Pnnter, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;® Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; ©Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers all rights reserved.; 0 Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its suppliers all rights reserved.; Attachment #3 to Information Report 04-20 city PICKERING Air Photo Map City Development Department File: SP -2015-03 & A05/15 Date: Feb. 11, 2020 © The Corporation of the City of Pickanng Produced (In part) under license froryp Quater, Olio Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;©Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Department o turales. All nghts reserved.; O Teranet Enterprises Inc. and Its suppliers all rights reserved.; © Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and Its suppliers all rights reserved.; 1 SCALE:1:12,000 Attachment #4 to Information Report 04-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision SP -2015-03 Proposed Development Detail Pickering Official Plan Designation • Employment Areas — Prestige Employment • Mixed Use Areas — Community Nodes • Mixed Use Areas — Mixed Corridor • Urban Residential Areas — Medium Density Areas • Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas • Open Space Systems — Seaton Natural Heritage System • Open Space Systems — Active Recreational Areas Neighbourhood Plan Designation • Seaton Natural Heritage System (not within the applications) • Prestige Employment General • Prestige Employment Node • Prestige Employment Node — that includes a Future Transitway Station (not within the applications) • Community Node • Mixed Corridor Type 2 • Gateway Site • Medium Density Area • Low Density Area Type 1 • Heritage Lot (not within the applications) • High Schools • Elementary Schools • Recreation Centre • Neighbourhood Park • Village Green • District Energy (not within the applications) Zoning Existing • A — Agricultural, By-law 3037 Proposed • appropriate to permit proposed draft plan in Seaton Zoning By-law 7364/14 - 10 - Details of the Draft Plan Total area of Draft Plan Prestige Employment Prestige Employment Node Community Node Mixed Corridor Type 2 Street Townhouse Dwelling Units Detached Dwelling Units High School Elementary Schools Recreation Centre Neighbourhood Park Village Green Trail Head Stormwater Management facilities Open Space/Buffer Servicing/Walkway Municipal Roads Residential Units Detached Dwelling Units Street Townhouse Dwelling Units Mixed Corridor Type 2 Dwelling Units Community Node Dwelling Units Total Dwelling Units • 138.8 hectares • 14.2 hectares • 34.5 hectares • 7.2 hectares • 10.6 hectares • 11.2 hectares • 13.5 hectares • 6.4 hectares • 4.5 hectares • 4.1 hectares • 3.0 hectares • 1.0 hectares • 0.1 hectares • 8.4 hectares • 0.1 hectares • 0.1 hectares • 19.0 hectares • 405 • 578 • 636 • 578 2197 Attachment #5 to Information Report 04-20 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, October 5, 2015 7:00 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Pickles Present: Mayor Ryan Councillors: K. Ashe I. Cumming R. Johnson B. McLean D. Pickles Absent: J. O'Connell Also Present: T. Prevedel - P. Bigioni - G. McGregor - C. Rose - D. Shields - J. Brooks - N. Surti - R. Pym - L. Paray - L. Roberts - Chief Administrative Officer. Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor (Acting) Director, City Development Chief Planner City Clerk Manager, Policy & Geomatics Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Principal Planner, Strategic Initiatives Planner Committee Coordinator (I) Disclosure of Interest No disclosures of interest were noted. (II) Part 'A' Information Reports Nilesh Surti, Manager, Development Review & Urban Design, gave an outline of the requirements for a Statutory Meeting under the Planning Act. He outlined the notification process procedures and also noted that if a person or public body does not make oral or written submissions to the City before the by-law is passed, that person or public body are not entitled to appeal the decision of City Council to the Ontario Municipal Board, and may not be entitled to be added as a party to the hearing unless, in the opinion of the Board, there are reasonable grounds to do so. Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, October 5, 2015 7:00 pm — Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Pickles Information Report No. 06-15 Draft Plans of Subdivision Applications SP -2015-01, SP 2015-03, S P-2015-04, SP -2015-05, SP -2015-06 Zoning By-law Amendment Applications A 2/15, A 5/15, A 8/15, A 10/15 and A 11/15 Ontario Infrastructure and Land Corporation Seaton Community A public information meeting was held under the Planning Act, for the purpose of informing the public with respect to the above -noted application. Ross Pym, Principal Planner, Strategic Initiatives, with the aid of a power point presentation, provided an outline of Information Report 06-15. He provided an overview of the five applications for the Seaton Community, explaining the various land uses within the developable areas and along Brock Road. He noted he would be available after the meeting to answer questions. He also explained the permitted uses for the buffer area surrounding Whitevale, explaining low intensity uses such as parks and schools, with no new residential development in this area. Emma West, planningAlliance, appeared before the Committee on behalf of Infrastructure Ontario, noting she was. in attendance to receive comments from the residents. Lloyd Thomas, 489 Whitevale Road, appeared before the Committee, providing Members with a map, outlining where the trails come down from the 407 along North Road. He indicated the Old Quarry could be a potential site for a secondary trail head. He explained the ecological sensitivity of the area where the development was proposed, and questioned a better use for this land, which is a hub for trails. He stated this would be an ideal area for a trail head, as it head north into Rouge Park. He also stated parking is already inadequate in the area. He asked that Council request the Provincial Government to place this land into the greenbelt for use as a trail head, noting the influx of residents would have access to hiking and fishing. Rob Quig, 440 Whitevale Road, appeared before the Committee questioning what the proposed plan was for the Heritage Hamlet open space. He requested clarification on the use of a community park. Susan Wilson, 3245 North Road, appeared before the Committee noting her concerns regarding the impact on existing wells. She questioned whether an assessment would be done to ensure water protection for existing residents with the subdivision being to the north, and subsequent recourse should they experience water problems. 2 13 - Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, October 5, 2015 7:00 pm — Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Pickles Marion Thomas, 489 Whitevale Road, appeared before the Committee, noting some confusion with respect to the North Road development, questioning where exactly the development would be in proximity to the pit. She also noted concerns with respect to illegal dumping, stating the pits are a great place to walk and experience nature. She noted it was unclear where the Natural Heritage area is and where the residential and industrial development would be going, noting she would like to see a better plan. Ms. Thomas noted her support with the plan to build a trail head as well as the need for additional parking. She also stated her desire to see a car pool area in the Seaton development. Mrs. Douglas, 3230 Mulberry Lane appeared before the Committee noting her concerns with respect to trail head issues. She stated that currently there are a number of issues with respect to noise from dirt bikes and four wheelers. She stated this should be a quiet area, and requested justification for what the usage would be for the trail heads. Karen Hodson, 3555 Sideline 34, Green River, appeared before the Committee questioning whether the current residents would have an opportunity to upgrade to City water and sewer. Scott Finlayson, 3185 Altona Road, Whitevale, appeared before the Committee questioning whether an environmental assessment had been done and what the next steps were. Arzo Baig appeared before the Committee questioning the greenspace use and whether a wildlife impact study had been completed. Jennifer Krueger, 492 Churchwin Street, Whitevale, appeared before the Committee and also questioned whether City hook ups for water and sewer would be offered, as Whitevale residents are currently on wells and septic tanks. She also questioned what would happen in the event that the current residents experience problems with their wells. Mike Rowan, 75 Highway 7, Green River, appeared before the Committee questioning where the waste disposal site would be situated as well as traffic plans for Highway 7 as Seaton develops. Abel Wong, 540 Whitevale Road, appeared before the Committee questioning the open space areas and noting concerns with respect to noise, safety as well as traffic. He questioned whether the traffic studies were realistic or underestimated. He also noted concerns with respect to the impact on existing wells and water pollution due to construction. City oO Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, October 5, 2015 7:00 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Pickles Peter Rodrigues, 750 Whitevale Road, appeared before the Committee, stating this was the time for Council to take action to protect sensitive land. He stated more precision was needed to determlTTe exact boundaries and questioned the number of housing units being proposed . . Hyder Baig, 3181 Golf Club Road, Whitevale, appeared before the Committee, noting concerns with respect to the impact on underground streams with the digging around Whitevale and who would be responsible n the event their wells go dry. He also noted concerns with respect to safety,, questioning whether fencing was being considered. Nicole Brewster, 335 Whitevale Road, appeared before the Committee noting concerns for the lands being proposed for school sites, questioning what the process would be should a school not be constructed. She also noted concerns with respect to a lack of parking, noting the area is heavily used and also questioned how the open space areas would be utilized. Emma West reappeared n response to questions raised, noting that the concerns would be discussed n more detail once all comments had been received, including agency comments such as TRCA and the Region of Durham. A question and answer period ensued with respect to the Quarry, infrastructure for additional roads to move traffic n and out of the area on main roads such as Brock and Taunton. Cfy �t DICKERING Report to Planning & Development Committee Report Number: PLN 04-20 Date: March 2, 2020 From: Kyle Bentley Director, City Development & CBO Subject: The Municipal Comprehensive Review of the Durham Regional Official Plan: Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper, September 2019 File: A-2100-020 Recommendation: 1. a) That the goals for the Environment and Greenlands System in the current Regional Official Plan are still relevant and appropriate; b) That the policy framework where the natural environment and agricultural lands intersect be clarified; and c) That the Regional Official Plan incorporate a climate change lens recognizing the impact climate change may have on the natural environment and infrastructure. 2. a) That policies be introduced in the Regional Official Plan that promote greater collaboration with conservation authorities respecting the investigation and implementation of mechanisms for the control of invasive species and pests throughout the Region; and b) That policies be introduced in the Regional Official Plan that promote education programs that help to create an awareness of invasive species and pests present in the Region. 3. That policies that address the matter of excess soil/soil conservation be included in the Regional Official Plan in order that existing drainage patterns are maintained, sedimentation and erosion is mitigated, disturbance of landform characteristics are minimized, groundwater, watercourses and natural heritage features are protected, infrastructure is safeguarded, quality of soils is tested to ensure that human health and the environment is protected, and the impact of fill hauling on residents is mitigated. 4. That, if the Region adds policies in its Official Plan to restrict or limit the land application of septage (which is waste material removed from portable toilets, sewage holding tanks and septic systems), it is not clear what mechanism the Region would have to enforce such policies. 5. That policies regarding ecosystem compensation and valuation be included in the Regional Official Plan in order to address the socio-economic benefits and loss associated with natural heritage and hydrologic features and their functions due to development impacts. - 16 - PLN 04-20 March 2, 2020 Subject: The Municipal Comprehensive Review of the Durham Regional Official Plan Page 2 6. a) That the Region consider requesting the Province to make resources available to Indigenous Peoples to facilitate the sharing of Traditional Ecological Knowledge; and b) That the Region, through a coordinated consultation with the Indigenous communities within the Region, endeavour to provide guidance to local area municipalities in terms of who, and how, these communities can appropriately be consulted. 7. a) That, in the future, the Region provide financial support for the LEAF program (backyard tree planting program), and others as appropriate; and b) That the Region continue and expand its support for environmental stewardship through financial resource contributions, and by including policy in the Regional Official Plan that encourages participation with local area municipalities, conservation authorities and others as appropriate. 8. That the Region continue to use the "Major Open Space" designation on non -prime agricultural lands, in the new Regional Official Plan. 9. a) That, since each "Waterfront Places" location within Durham is unique, the designation and delineation of Waterfront Places be dealt with as a local planning matter, similar to the approach for Local Centres; and b) That the Waterfront Places symbols be removed from the Regional Official Plan, and that local municipalities be provided with greater discretion regarding the identification of areas for growth, and the distribution and density of development within their municipalities. 10.a) That an Open Space Linkages designation continue to be identified in the Regional Official Plan for the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor in Pickering, as it represents an east -west corridor for flora and fauna, as well as the location for trails for the movement of people; b) That the Region include policies that address the preparation of a "Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor Management Plan" and establishes funding for ongoing maintenance and restoration of the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor in the Regional Official Plan; and c) That the Waterfront Link north of the Pickering Nuclear Generating Station continue to be identified in the Regional Official Plan in recognition of its importance as an east -west corridor for flora and fauna, as well as for the movement of people. 11.a) That policies be included in the Regional Official Plan that establish separate tree canopy targets for urban and rural areas, following the identification of the current baseline; and b) That the implementation of Regional Road tree planting be assumed by the Region to demonstrate their partnership in improving the tree canopy. 12. That if the Region decides to include targets for other natural heritage and hydrologic features in addition to woodlands in the Regional Official Plan, they consult with the conservation authorities and other appropriate experts. - 17 - PLN 04-20 March 2, 2020 Subject: The Municipal Comprehensive Review of the Durham Regional Official Plan Page 3 13. That the Region leave it to the local area municipalities to include the more detailed policies prescribing minimum vegetation protection zones in their official plans. 14.a) That the Region adopt an "overlay" approach to identifying where key natural heritage and key hydrologic features form a component of the Natural Heritage System at the regional level; b) That appropriate policy language be included to allow for adjustments to the overlay where it is deemed appropriate by lower -tier municipalities in consultation with their conservation authorities through various means, such as site specific environmental impact studies, without the need for amendments to the Regional Official Plan; and c) That the Region have an upper -tier level Natural Heritage System that primarily reflects the Provincial Natural Heritage System, and encourage area municipalities to maintain their own established natural heritage systems. 15.a) That, in considering policies and/or mapping related to wildland fire hazards, the Region identify areas of potential for hazardous forest types for wildland fire as a screening tool to inform development decisions, as well as for awareness and education; and (b) That the Region consider including wildland fire hazard policies in the Regional Official Plan in order to apply a consistent approach to mitigation as well as appropriate mitigation measures. 16. That the Region keep the current policies in the Regional Official Plan that provide guidance on the conveyance of land for natural heritage conservation as they adequately address the matter. 17. That the Region consider implementing policies that provide additional detail regarding the requirements for an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) that include, but are not limited to, the requirement that an EIS describe: • the mitigation, improvement and restoration measures to be used to address the environmental conditions to ensure that the proposed development or site alteration will have no adverse impacts on the natural heritage system or its related ecological functions; • the location and extent of the environmental features and functions that should be preserved; and • the recommendations for appropriate buffers between the area of development or site alteration. 18. That the Region consider enhancing its definition of "sensitive uses" and including more detailed assessment information within the Regional Official Plan. 19. (a) That the Region recognize the following additional sectors as being impacted by climate change: fisheries; finance and insurance; infrastructure; mental health; vulnerable populations; organizational risk management and emergency preparedness; summer recreation; and urban tree canopy health; - 18 - PLN 04-20 March 2, 2020 Subject: The Municipal Comprehensive Review of the Durham Regional Official Plan Page 4 (b) That the Region understand that the City's vision for climate change and adaptation for Durham is a holistic approach based on a framework for sustainability, wherein policies about climate change should address the following objectives: healthy environment; healthy economy; healthy society; responsible development; and responsible consumption; (c) That the Region consider implementing policies that address the changing climate and methods, techniques and best practices for adaptation, mitigation and resiliency in the Regional Official Plan; (d) That the Region introduce a policy in the Regional Official Plan identifying the advocacy role that it can play in adapting to climate change in collaboration with all levels of government and a wide variety of stakeholders; and (e) That the Region recognize the Rouge National Urban Park and its management objectives in the Regional Official Plan. Executive Summary: On September 3, 2019, the Regional Municipality of Durham released the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper, the fourth in a series of discussion papers being released as part of Envision Durham, The Municipal Comprehensive Review of the Durham Regional Official Plan. The Region has requested comments on the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper. City staff recommend that the comments in this report on the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper be endorsed as the City comments. Financial Implications: The recommendations of this report do not present any financial implications to the City of Pickering. Discussion: 1. Purpose The purpose of this report is to obtain Council's approval of staff's comments on the Region of Durham's Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper. Appendix I contains the comments and recommendations on the Discussion Paper. 2. "Envision Durham" — The Municipal Comprehensive Review of the Durham Regional Official Plan An Official Plan provides a vision for the future orderly development of a municipality through a set of policies and maps. The Planning Act, which is provincial legislation governing land use planning in Ontario, requires that a municipality regularly review and update its Official Plan. With this in mind, the Region is reviewing the Durham Regional Official Plan. Once the Region has completed its Official Plan review, the City will be in a position to review the Pickering Official Plan. - 19 - PLN 04-20 March 2, 2020 Subject: The Municipal Comprehensive Review of the Durham Regional Official Plan Page 5 The first stage of the Region's Official Plan Review (ROP) focuses on public engagement, and includes the preparation of a series of discussion papers. These discussion papers address the following major areas: agriculture and rural systems; climate change and sustainability; growth management; the environment; transportation; and housing (see Overview of the Region of Durham's Municipal Comprehensive Review of its Official Plan, Attachment #1). 3. The Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper This discussion paper provides an overview of Durham's Environment and Greenlands System, explains the current ROP policy framework and identifies provincial policy requirements and trends since the last ROP review and identifies preliminary approaches and questions for discussion and feedback. Through this exercise, the Region will review its Environment and Greenlands System policies and implement the Provincial Policy Statement and Provincial Plans by (among other matters): • Updating goals and objectives for these subject areas, if necessary. • Updating definitions (and associated policies) to reflect revised provincial policy. • Broadening goals and policies to: • Further support the identification and protection of natural heritage systems. • Protect water resource systems and key hydrologic areas, in addition to key hydrologic features. • Implement Source Protection Plans, the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan, and other relevant provincial policy and legislation. • Enhance watershed planning requirements. • Strengthen policies restricting development in areas that are subject to natural hazards and consider the impacts of climate change on natural hazards in accordance with provincial policy. • Add further detail regarding vegetation protection zones, if determined to be appropriate. • Incorporate policy support for the preparation of cultural plans and archaeological management plans, where appropriate. • Consider updated waste management policies and legislation including the implications of development and land use patterns on waste generation, management and diversion. • Reference provincial guidance where appropriate. • Incorporate policy considerations to account for: enhanced Indigenous engagement requirements (particularly around the cultural heritage landscape and archaeological resources); green infrastructure; and wildland fire hazards. • Review policies and technical documents related to land securement, environmental impact studies, and land use compatibility, including site contamination, noise, and light pollution. • Review "Tourist Activity/Recreational Nodes", "Open Space Linkages", and "Waterfront Links" that form part of the existing Greenlands System. -20- PLN 04-20 March 2, 2020 Subject: The Municipal Comprehensive Review of the Durham Regional Official Plan Page 6 The Region will also seek to make changes to its Land Use Schedules (mapping) in the ROP with a view to: • Update natural features and water resources mapping to reflect currently available data and include additional mapping for source protection and water resources. • Refine, where necessary, the Greenlands System to reflect Provincial Agricultural and Natural Heritage Systems mapping. • Establish a Regional Natural Heritage System. • Refine or redefine the Major Open Space Areas designation. • Consider whether to include supplemental mapping identifying Watershed Plan Areas. The Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper can be found online at: https://www.durham.ca/en/regional- government/resources/Documents/Council/Reports/2019-Committee-Reports/Planning- Economic-Development/2019-P-36---Attachment-1-Environment--Greenlands-System- Discussion-Paper. pdf 4. Staff Comments The Paper poses 19 questions for discussion. City Development staff has undertaken a detailed review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper (see Appendix I), and the response to questions form the recommendations of this Report. Appendix Appendix I Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Attachment: 1. Overview of the Region of Durham's Municipal Comprehensive Review of its Official Plan - 21 - PLN 04-20 March 2, 2020 Subject: The Municipal Comprehensive Review of the Durham Regional Official Plan Page 7 Prepared By: Original Signed By: Margaret Kish, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Policy Original Signed By: C. Rose for Dean Jacobs, MCIP,RPP Manager, Policy & Geomatics MK:Id Approved/Endorsed By: Original Signed By: Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Chief Planner Original Signed By: Kyle Bentley, P. Eng. Director, City Development & CBO Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Original Signed By: Tony Prevedel, P.Eng. Chief Administrative Officer -22- Appendix 1 to Report PLN 04-20 Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper 1.0 Background On September 3, 2019, the Region, as part of the second stage ("Discuss") of their public engagement program, released the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper (the Paper), the fourth in a series of discussions papers to be released as part of "Envision Durham" the Municipal Comprehensive Review (MCR). The Paper provides an overview of the Regional Official Plan (ROP) policy framework and many of the environmental issues and requirements affecting the Greenlands System that the Region must consider. 1.1 Questions for Consideration The following questions are posed throughout the Paper to generate discussion and feedback: 1. Are the current goals for the Environment and Greenlands System still relevant/appropriate? 2. How can the ROP be revised to further help address the issue of invasive species? 3. How can the Region best effectively support local implementation of excess soil policies? 4. Should the Region include policies in the ROP restricting or limiting the land application of septage? 5. Should policies regarding ecosystem compensation and valuation be included in the ROP through Envision Durham? If so, are there examples of best practices? 6. How can the ROP support the consideration of Traditional Ecological Knowledge in land -use decisions? 7. How can the ROP better support environmental stewardship efforts in Durham? What are other examples of best practices? 8. Are there additional factors the Region should take into account when re -considering the Major Open Space Areas designation? 9. Do you feel that a separate Tourist Activity/Recreational Node designation is necessary in the ROP? If so, do you feel the policies should be enhanced or revised? 10. Should Open Space Linkages and Waterfront Links continue to be identified in the ROP? If so, what additional areas should be identified and how could the policies associated with these areas be enhanced? 11. How can the Region best support the protection and enhancement of significant woodlands in Durham? 12. Should there be targets included in the ROP for other natural heritage and hydrologic features in addition to woodlands? 13. Should the Region include more detailed policies prescribing minimum vegetation protection zones (where they are not otherwise prescribed by provincial policy)? -24- Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 2 of 20 14. Recognizing the two-tier municipal system, how should the Region best protect the natural heritage system, features, and areas in the ROP (Overlay, designation, level of detail)? 15. How should the ROP address the issue of wildland fire hazards? 16. What should the Region's role be in the protection of land for environmental purposes and how can the ROP provide further policy support for this? 17. Are there any additional considerations or best practices that the Region should be considering when updating the Region's EIS policies? 18. Are there any other land use compatibility issues the Region should be considering through Envision Durham? 19. Have we missed any trends that you feel should be reviewed and considered in the environment/Greenlands System context as part of Envision Durham? The Paper does not present positions on potential changes that may be part of the ROP, and only provides information and poses questions for consideration. Regional staff will report to Regional Planning and Economic Development Committee on the results of the Discussion Papers in the next stages of the Envision Durham process. The following sections provide a high level overview of the Paper, and provide answers to the questions posed with staff recommendations (highlighted in bold) on matters that should be addressed through Envision Durham. 2.0 Provincial Land Use Planning Policy Context The Paper provides an outline of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 (PPS) and provincial plans that apply to Durham's Greenlands System (including the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, 2017; the Greenbelt Plan, 2017; A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2019 (A Place to Grow); the Central Pickering Development Plan, 2006; and the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan, 2009). The PPS and these plans provide direction on identification and protection of natural heritage systems, addressing impacts to the natural environment, protection of water resources, climate change, invasive species, endangered species, waste reduction and resource recovery, consideration of traditional ecological knowledge and environmental stewardship. The Lake Simcoe Protection Plan area does not include any lands within the City of Pickering and therefore, is not addressed in this review. Changes to the PPS and provincial plans since the last ROP update are to be addressed through this MCR. 2.1 Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 The PPS requires the wise use and management of resources and the protection of the health of the Great Lakes, natural heritage, water, agricultural, mineral and cultural heritage and archaeological resources for their economic, environmental, and social benefits. The PPS directs that natural features and areas and water resources shall be protected for the long term, and requires municipalities to identify natural heritage systems and water resource systems in official plans. -25- Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 3 of 20 In July of 2019, the Province of Ontario released proposed revisions to the PPS for comment. Some of the potential changes related to the Environment and Greenlands System policies include: • Strengthened requirements for effective engagement with Indigenous communities, including consideration of traditional knowledge in land use planning. • Increased flexibility for municipalities to manage wetlands that are not identified as significant. • Introduction of the requirement to evaluate the impacts of climate change in watershed planning, consistent with the requirements of A Place to Grow. • Introduction of the requirement to prepare for the impacts of climate change in relation to natural hazards. • Introduction of a policy in support of best practices in management of excess soil. • Changes to cultural heritage definitions. 2.2 A Place to Grow A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2019 recognizes the value of protecting hydrologic and natural heritage features and areas. The plan contains policy guidance regarding watershed planning, the implementation of a Natural Heritage System and policy to support green infrastructure, water conservation, including water demand management, for the efficient use of water. In 2018, the Province released a Growth Plan Natural Heritage System that identifies a natural heritage system beyond the Greenbelt Plan Area within the Greater Golden Horseshoe, outside of urban areas. The ROP will be updated through Envision Durham to conform with A Place to Grow. 2.3 Greenbelt Plan and Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan The Provincial Greenbelt Plan identifies where urbanization should not occur in order to provide permanent protection to the agricultural land base and the ecological and hydrological features, areas and functions occurring on this landscape. Land use activity on the Oak Ridges Moraine is governed by the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act, and the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (ORMCP).The ORMCP is an ecologically based plan that provides land use and resource management direction for the Oak Ridges Moraine. Key updates included the addition of policies for key hydrologic areas, as well as the introduction of policies and mapping pertaining to urban river valleys. The current ROP implements the ORMCP (2002) and the Greenbelt Plan (2005) and will be updated through Envision Durham to conform with the 2017 plans. Key updates to these Provincial plans included the addition of policies for key hydrologic areas, as well as the introduction of policies and mapping pertaining to urban river valleys. -26- Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 4 of 20 2.4 Water Since 2003, the protection of water resources and systems has become a key provincial priority. The introduction of the Clean Water Act, 2006, Source Protection Plans, 2015, and related Assessment Reports, The Great Lakes Protection Act, 2015, and Strategy, and International agreements such as the Canada -US Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement and the Canada -Ontario Agreement respecting the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem, will all be considered through Envision Durham to implement new, and strengthen existing, policies related to water resources as appropriate. 2.5 Endangered and Threatened Species The 2014 PPS included new policies related to Species at Risk, including a definition of Habitat of Endangered Species and Threatened Species. These new policies will be addressed through Envision Durham. 2.6 Waste The Waste Free Ontario Act received Royal Assent in 2016 and focuses on shifting the responsibility and costs of waste management to producers and manufacturers of packaging. This Act led to the creation of the Strategy for a Waste -Free Ontario: Building the Circular Economy. The Waste Free Ontario Act enabled the Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act which focuses on waste reduction and resource recovery. The first policy statement issued under the authority of the Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act in April 2018 was the Food and Organic Waste Policy Statement. This policy statement provides policy direction related to waste reduction and resource recovery of food and organic waste, which is intended to help improve environmental outcomes, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and recover valuable nutrients, thus fostering a circular economy. Through Envision Durham, the Region will consider whether it is appropriate to add policies to the ROP that reflect provincial policy related to waste reduction, waste diversion and resource recovery. 2.7 Environmental Protection Act The Environmental Protection Act (EPA) establishes various pollution controls in the province as well as the definition of waste and waste disposal site. The ROP must be consistent with the polices established in the EPA. 2.8 Made in Ontario Environment Plan The Made in Ontario Environment Plan, released for public consultation in November 2018, establishes how the Province will address climate change and greenhouse gases, water resources, reductions in waste, clean soil, and the protection of natural ecosystems among other environmental issues. Through Envision Durham, the Region will monitor the consultation process and outcome, and implement polices brought forward by the plan as appropriate. -27- Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 5 of 20 2.9 Provincial Guidance Documents The Region will be considering several guidance documents that have been released by the Province in support of the implementation of the provincial plans including: • Natural Heritage Reference Manual, 2005. • Greenbelt Plan 2005 — Technical Definitions and Criteria for Key Natural Heritage Features in the Natural Heritage System of the Protected Countryside Area: Technical Paper 1, 2012. • The Regional Natural Heritage System for the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe: Summary of Criteria and Methods, 2018. • Wildland Fire Risk Assessment and Mitigation Reference Manual in Support of the PPS 2014, 2017. • Management of Excess Soil: A Guide for Best Management Practices, 2016. • Strategy for a Waste -Free Ontario: Building the Circular Economy, 2017. 3.0 Durham Regional Official Plan Structure The ROP is based on a Regional Structure, which includes a continuous Greenlands System that is integrated with both the Urban and Rural Systems, to protect and connect the Oak Ridges Moraine, key natural heritage and hydrologic features, waterfronts, and to provide urban separators (lands that define and separate Lake Ontario based urban areas), and recreational opportunities. The Greenlands System supports environmental conservation, major recreational uses (including golf courses and ski hills), waterfronts and other rural and agricultural land uses. Durham's Greenlands System includes the following land use designations: Major Open Space Areas; Oak Ridges Moraine Areas; Waterfront Areas; Tourist Activity/Recreational Nodes; Waterfront Places; Open Space Linkage; and Waterfront Links. The ROP establishes broad land use goals and directions that support the environment and Greenlands System while striving to balance growth, conservation of resources and protection of the environment. The Greenlands System also contains agricultural and agriculture -related, and on-farm diversified uses which are to be protected as integral components of the system. In response to Question 1, staff is satisfied that the existing goals and directions in the ROP for the Environment and Greenlands System are appropriate and relevant. However, staff recommends that the Region clarify the policy framework where the natural environment and agricultural lands intersect, and that the ROP incorporate a climate change lens recognizing the impact it may have on the natural environment and infrastructure. 4.0 Durham's Environmental Approach A key goal of the environmental policies of the ROP is to "ensure the preservation, conservation and enhancement of the region's natural environment for its valuable ecological functions and for the enjoyment of the region's residents." This goal provides the basis for policies that ensure that natural heritage features and areas are given "paramount consideration" in the planning and development of the region. In addition, when considering development applications, the ROP requires that the "cumulative impact" on the environment be considered. -28- Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 6 of 20 The Region is the primary funder of the five conservation authorities within its jurisdiction and works in partnership with them, the area municipalities and others with a view to protecting and enhancing the natural environment, educating the public, and supporting approaches which improve sustainable planning and development practices. As a primary funder of the Region's conservation authorities, it enables the implementation of projects and initiatives that support environmental improvement. Since 2003, several plans and strategies have been implemented by the Region, and others, to support the advancement of environmental initiatives. They include: The Durham Region Strategic Plan; From Vision to Action: Region of Durham Community Climate Change Local Action Plan; Durham Community Energy Plan; Toward Resilience: Durham Community Climate Adaptation Plan 2016. All of these plans and strategies will be considered through the Envision Durham study process. 4.1 Invasive Species Since the last review of the ROP, the Invasive Species Act, 2015 (the Act) has been passed and has had a significant effect on how invasive species are managed in Ontario. The Act sets out the rules to prevent and control the spread of invasive species throughout the province. The Act defines an invasive species as a species that is not native to Ontario and is harmful or can be harmful to the natural environment. This includes plants, animals, or micro-organisms. In addition, the Act classifies invasive species as either prohibited or restricted. Through Envision Durham, the Region will be considering incorporation of policies related to invasive species. The Pickering Official Plan contains policies that support the planting of non-invasive tree species and vegetation in relation to the Urban Forest, as well as supporting actions to improve and restore the quality of Lake Ontario as it relates to the proliferation of invasive species. It is appropriate that the ROP be updated to include policies to address the issue of invasive species. In response to Question 2, staff recommends that policies be introduced in the ROP that promote greater collaboration with conservation authorities respecting the investigation and implementation of mechanisms for the control of invasive species and pests throughout the Region. This recommendation is consistent with Council's comments on the Climate Change and Sustainability Discussion Paper contained in Report PLN 21-19, dated October 7, 2019 and endorsed by Resolution #150/19. In addition, staff recommends that policies be introduced in the ROP that promote education programs that help to create an awareness of invasive species and pests present in the Region. 4.2 Excess Soil and Soil Conservation Excess soil is soil that has been excavated, typically during construction activities, and moved to another site because it cannot be reused on site. Currently, the ROP has no policies related to excess soil or soil conservation. -29- Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 7 of 20 The Province released an Excess Soil Management Policy Framework and Regulatory Proposal and a document entitled Management of Excess Soil: A Guide for Best Management Practices. In addition, as part of the Made in Ontario Environment Plan, in May 2019, the Province released draft regulations regarding the rules for managing and transporting excess soil. The Pickering Official Plan addresses excess topsoil in policy 10.3 (d), which states that the City shall encourage public and private practices that protect important key natural heritage features and landscapes in their natural state, including implementing soil erosion controls such as: Topsoil and Fill By-laws; construction practices which minimize the exposure of soil to the elements; and soil conserving agricultural practices. In addition, the City of Pickering Council adopted Fill and Topsoil Disturbance By-law, (which is currently under review), regulates changes to properties that involve the removal or addition of fill or topsoil, or changes to the grading. Certain work involving the addition or removal of fill or topsoil may be subject to a Fill and Topsoil Disturbance Permit. The permit process allows the City to review any potential issues that could arise when large scale changes to grade are proposed. These issues include erosion and sediment control, the protection of watercourses, professional engineering to establish appropriate grading and drainage, a review of trees and vegetation affected and many other factors to be considered. In response to Question 3, staff recommends that policies that address the matter of excess soil/soil conservation be included in the ROP in order that existing drainage patterns are maintained, sedimentation and erosion is mitigated, disturbance of landform characteristics are minimized, groundwater, watercourses and natural heritage features are protected, infrastructure is safeguarded, quality of soils is tested to ensure that human health and the environment is protected, and the impact of fill hauling on residents is mitigated. 4.3 Septage Septage is waste material removed from portable toilets, sewage holding tanks and septic systems. The Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) currently regulates the transportation and land application/disposal of untreated septage through Environmental Compliance Approvals issued under the EPA, and through Ontario's General Waste Management Regulation under the EPA. In addition, the application of treated septage to agricultural land for crop benefit falls under the Nutrient Management Act and would be exempt from the approval requirements for land application/disposal under the EPA. In early 2016, MECP was examining options for addressing environmental impacts and human health concerns associated with hauled sewage management, including its treatment, disposal and beneficial use. The ROP does not contain policies related to septage. -30- Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 8 of 20 The Pickering Official Plan contains policies as part of a resource management strategy that promotes stewardship of resources for existing and future generations including encouraging individuals to make environmentally responsible choices. In addition, risk management strategies included in the Pickering Official Plan address the protection of people from environmentally hazardous conditions or locations that pose a danger to public safety, health or property. However, the Pickering Official Plan does not contain specific policies relating to the transportation and land application/disposal of untreated septage. In response to Question 4, since septage is currently regulated by the Province, if the Region adds policies in its Official Plan to restrict or limit the land application of septage, it is not clear what mechanism the Region would have to enforce such policies. Perhaps the preferred approach is liaising with the Province regarding revised locational circumstances. 4.4 Ecosystem Compensation and Valuation The "ecosystem services" approach to environmental planning recognizes the socio- economic benefits associated with natural heritage and hydrologic features and their functions. Over time, provincial land -use planning policy has placed a stronger focus on the protection and enhancement of natural features and natural heritage systems. More recently, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has established protocols and formulae for calculating the financial value of features, functions, or areas; and requiring such financial value to be secured and applied toward enhancing natural heritage systems elsewhere. The TRCA Guideline for Determining Ecosystem Compensation (the Guideline) is a thoroughly researched approach to ecosystem compensation. There is not widespread agreement on an accepted methodology for the valuation of ecosystem goods and services. Council endorsed Resolution #68/19 (Report PLN 07-19, dated April 1, 2019) that, among other matters, authorizes staff to initiate an amendment to the Pickering Official Plan to introduce policies, on a city-wide basis, that address ecosystem loss and compensation due to development impacts, where all options for protection have been exhausted. In addition, Resolution #68/19 authorizes staff to develop a memorandum of understanding in consultation with Toronto and Region Conservation Authority regarding the administration and collection of the fees and technical guidance regarding the interpretation and calculation of compensation in terms of the Guideline. A draft memorandum of understanding is currently being prepared by staff in consultation with the TRCA. In response to Question 5, staff recommends that policies regarding ecosystem compensation and valuation be included in the ROP in order to address the socio- economic benefits and loss associated with natural heritage and hydrologic features and their functions. 4.5 Traditional Ecological Knowledge Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) is knowledge unique to Indigenous Peoples about the natural environment and processes, built up through generations of living in close contact with nature and the land. - 31 - Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 9 of 20 The value of TEK is already recognized and incorporated through Environmental Assessments under the Environmental Assessment Act and has been recognized through recent updates to the Provincial Policy Statement and Provincial Plans. The City of Pickering has, through the development of Seaton, experienced first-hand the challenges of engaging with Indigenous Peoples that, at that time, lacked the human and financial resources to provide timely responses for requests for comments on planning and development application circulation. In response to Question 6, staff recommends that the Region consider requesting the Province to make resources available to Indigenous Peoples to facilitate the sharing of TEK. In addition, the Region should, through a coordinated consultation with the Indigenous communities within the Region, endeavour to provide guidance to local area municipalities in terms of who, and how, these communities can appropriately be consulted. 4.6 Environmental Stewardship The City of Pickering's award winning sustainability program is grounded in five broad sustainability objectives: Healthy Environment, Healthy Economy, Healthy Society, Responsible Development, and Responsible Consumption. The Sustainable Pickering program is also reflected in the City's Corporate Priorities, through Sustainable Placemaking. In 2010, the City produced its first report on measuring sustainability, which included indicators and baseline measurements that were identified in consultation with staff, stakeholders and residents. Since then, new indicators reflecting the City's evolving sustainability objectives have been added resulting in a total of 52 indicators that are measured and reported on every four years, the most recent 2017 report can be viewed at pickering.ca/msr. These indicators reflect five categories and twenty-four areas of interest relating to environment, economy, society, development and consumption. A Year -in - Review is also produced to report the most recent progress and highlight the City's awards, accolades, programs and projects that support environmental stewardship. The 2018 Sustainable Pickering Year -In -Review document can be found at https://www.pickering.ca/en/living/resources/2018-Sustainable-Year-in-Review.pdf. Some examples of more recent environmental stewardship initiatives that the City and its partners have undertaken include: • Conversion of over 7,000 streetlights to LED, as well as City facility lighting retrofits. Veridian presented the City with a cheque for $642,282 as part of the Save on Energy Rebate program. The City will also save $690,000 per year in combined electricity and maintenance costs (Lighting — Largest Savings Award). • Take Pride in Pickering Tree Planting (100 attendees planted 300 trees/450 shrubs and picked up litter). • Dog Waste Diversion Program: 7 tonnes of dog waste was collected from City park dog waste diversion stations and converted into electricity, heat and nutrient dense fertilizer. -32- Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 10 of 20 • Compost Giveaway: in partnership with the Region of Durham, 1,500 Pickering residents picked up free compost made from organics collected through the Region's curbside green bin and yard waste programs. • Electric Vehicles and Charging Stations: the addition of five electric vehicles to the City's fleet and six charging stations which will contribute to improved air quality, cost savings, reduced maintenance and a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. It is the City's understanding that the Region is proposing to support a LEAF program (backyard tree planting program) in 2020 in partnership with area municipalities. In response to Question 7, staff recommends that the Region provide financial support for the LEAF program, and other programs as appropriate, and that the Region continue and expand its support for environmental stewardship through financial resource contributions, and by including policy that encourages participation with local area municipalities, conservation authorities and others as appropriate. 4.7 Major Open Space Areas Major Open Space Areas in the ROP support the ecological health of the region and protects environmentally sensitive areas and their ecological functions. The Major Open Space Areas designation includes lands containing natural heritage and hydrologic features and "rural lands", as defined by the province, and permits agricultural, agriculture -related, and on-farm diversified uses. A large portion of the Region's Major Open Space Areas have been identified as Prime Agricultural Lands in the Province's recently released Agricultural System Mapping. The Province has indicated a preference for lands within the Rural Area, that are not considered to be Prime Agricultural lands, to be referred to as "rural lands". Through the MCR the Region will consider whether to move forward with a "Rural Lands" designation. The "Natural Areas" designation in the Pickering Official Plan is, for the most part, consistent with the "Major Open Space" designation in the ROP in terms of geography and permissible uses. The Pickering Official Plan recognizes both "Prime Agricultural Areas" and "Natural Areas". "Natural Areas", although primarily focused on conservation, protection and restoration of the environment, includes permissions for agricultural uses. A change to the "Major Open Space" designation would present structural challenges to both the ROP and the Pickering Official Plan and make interpretation of mapping in both Plans more complex. Council's comments on the Agricultural and Rural System Discussion Paper contained in Report PLN 13-19 dated May 6, 2019 recommends that the Region continue to use the "Major Open Space" designation on non -prime agricultural lands, in the new ROP. In response to Question 8, staff recommends that the Region continue to use the "Major Open Space" designation on non -prime agricultural lands, in the new ROP. -33- Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 11 of 20 4.8 Tourist Activity/Recreational Nodes and Waterfront Places 4.8.1 Tourist Activity/Recreational Nodes The ROP designates "Tourist Activity/Recreational Nodes" along the waterfront areas of Lake Ontario, Lake Scugog and Lake Simcoe within the Region. Currently, the ROP does not designate any "Tourist Activity/Recreational Nodes" along the Lake Ontario waterfront areas within the City of Pickering. The ROP does, however, identify a "Waterfront Place" within the Frenchman's Bay area. 4.8.2 Waterfront Places Waterfront Places are intended to be developed as focal points along the Lake Ontario waterfront and may include residential, commercial, and recreational uses, as well as marinas, tourism establishments and cultural and community facilities. There are five Waterfront Places identified in the ROP, including one in Pickering at Frenchman's Bay. The ROP recognizes that each Waterfront Place has unique characteristics and permits development to occur at a scale appropriate for the area. The Growth Management Urban System Discussion Paper states that preliminary discussions with area municipal staff indicates a preference for continued flexibility to implement Waterfront Places, as opposed to delineating their boundaries in the ROP, and that not all Waterfront Places will continue to meet the definition of Strategic Growth Areas since some are nearing build out while others have limited intensification potential. Accordingly, the Region is asking if Waterfront Places should be specifically designated in the ROP. Although Waterfront Places are symbolically designated within the Regional Official Plan, there is no common definition of what comprises a Waterfront Place or standard method of delineating their boundaries. Furthermore, there is no rationale for the density target and floor space index target contained in the ROP, and no requirement of the Province for the Region to detail such areas. While the plan provides a target density and FSI that can be applied where appropriate, this policy raises expectations that such targets will be applied to each area, not as an option, but as a requirement. In addition, the criteria in section 8A.2.13 of the ROP for the Waterfront Places are not unique and could, and possibly should, be applied to any development that occurs along the waterfront. In response to Question 9, staff recommends that, since each "Waterfront Places" location within Durham is unique, the designation and delineation of Waterfront Places be dealt with as a local planning matter, similar to the approach for Local Centres. As such, it is suggested that the Waterfront Places symbols be removed from the Regional Official Plan, and that local municipalities be provided with greater discretion regarding the identification of areas for growth, and the distribution and density of development within their municipalities. -34- Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 12 of 20 4.9 Open Space Linkages and Waterfront Links 4.9.1 Open Space Linkages: Rouge-Duffins Corridor The Rouge-Duffins Corridor in the City of Pickering, is identified as an "Open Space Linkage" in the ROP (ROP 10.3.2). "Open Space Linkages" are intended to provide additional connections within and between components of the Greenlands System Policies in the ROP. Further, policies in the Pickering Official Plan establish that these "Open Space Linkages": a) shall consist of natural areas and features in order to provide for the migration of flora and fauna as well as the movement of pedestrians where appropriate; b) that uses within and adjacent to the linkages shall preserve and maintain the environmental features and functions of the linkages; c) that the location, features and policies with respect to such linkages shall be detailed in the area municipal official plan in consultation with the Ministry of Natural Resources and respective conservation authority; and that prior to the undertaking of c) above, appropriate development may proceed within these areas in accordance with this policy. In accordance with ROP 10.3.2, the City's Official Plan identifies the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor on Schedule III B, Resource Management: Key Natural Heritage Features and contains policies relating to the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor (POP 10.20). In particular, policy 10.20 (g) states that Council shall encourage the relevant Provincial Ministry, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Region of Durham, Hydro Ontario Networks Inc., and interested others to prepare a "Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor Management Plan" and establish funding for ongoing maintenance and restoration of the Corridor. In response to Question 10, staff recommends that an Open Space for the Rouge Duffins Wildlife Corridor continue to be identified in the ROP as the corridor provides an east -west link for flora and fauna, and a location for trails for the movement of people. Additionally, in accordance with Pickering Official Plan policy 10.20 (g), staff recommends that the Region include policies that address the preparation of a "Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor Management Plan" and establishment of funding for ongoing maintenance and restoration of the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor, in support of this east -west corridor for flora and fauna, as well as a location for trails for the movement of people. 4.9.2 Waterfront Link: Pickering Nuclear Generating Station The ROP establishes that "Waterfront Link" is an area where access to the waterfront is not desirable or in the public interest. The ROP identifies a "Waterfront Link" along the northern boundary of the Pickering Nuclear Generating Station. This link recognizes its importance as an east -west corridor for flora and fauna, and is a location for the movement of people. There are no other policies associated with the designation "Waterfront Link" in the ROP. Other policies in the ROP establish and promote the waterfronts of Lake Ontario, and other lakes, as "people places" with the exception of significant natural areas, which are to be protected in their natural states, and as a continuous system, penetrating and linking the urban and rural areas. -35- Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 13 of 20 The Pickering Official Plan does not identify a similar area, or policy, related to the northern boundary of the Pickering Nuclear Generating Station. The Pickering Nuclear Generating Station is designated as a "Controlled Access Area" within the Pickering Official Plan. Also in response to Question 10, staff recommends that the Waterfront Link north of the Pickering Nuclear Generating Station continues to be identified in the ROP in recognition of its importance as an east -west corridor for flora and fauna, and the movement of people. 4.10 Significant Woodlands and Forest Management Plans and Strategies Urban trees and woodlands provide wildlife habitats, screening, noise reduction, dust traps, absorption of greenhouse gases, stormwater retention, and linkages to other wildlife areas. Urban forests are especially beneficial in reducing the urban heat island effect. Trees provide shade and stop the absorption of solar energy. This results in cooler surface and air temperatures. Trees also contribute to peace and tranquility, relief from stress, and aesthetic value. The Pickering Official Plan contains policies regarding the importance of the urban forest in maintaining a healthy ecosystem, managing stormwater, providing wildlife habitat and community aesthetics, reducing the heat island effect and improving air quality. The City's commitment to the identification, preservation and/or enhancement of the urban and rural forest and tree canopy is demonstrated through various initiatives such as the City's Tree Protection By-law, the Boulevard Tree Planting Program established in 2005, the Urban Forest Study prepared in 2011 in partnership with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the Tree Inventory, Preservation, and Removal Compensation Requirements adopted by Council in 2017. Currently the ROP establishes a target of 30 percent for woodland cover of the entire Region. Forest cover, covers approximately 26 percent of Durham Region. Information from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) and Durham Region Planning and Economic Development Department shows that the overall forest coverage for the City of Pickering is 21.8 percent. This is the second highest overall forest coverage as compared to the other Lakeshore municipalities within Durham Region. In addition, since the time of the last ROP review, forest cover has increased in all area municipalities in Durham. The ROP currently has a policy promoting tree planting by establishing a tree planting program, in cooperation with area municipalities and other stakeholders. The City's experience is that the local municipality is responsible for the tree planting on Regional Roads. Staff notes that with rising land values and higher levels of intensification, the City's urban tree canopy is disappearing, and most new development has little area for meaningful tree planting. In addition, the ability to obtain larger green park spaces in the intensification areas is becoming increasingly challenging. -36- Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 14 of 20 In response to Question 11, staff recommends that policies be included in the ROP that establish separate tree canopy targets for urban areas and rural areas, following the identification of the current baseline. Further, staff recommends that the implementation of Regional Road tree planting be assumed by the Region to demonstrate their partnership in improving the tree canopy. These recommendations is consistent with Council's comments on the Climate Change and Sustainability Discussion Paper contained in Report PLN 21-19, dated October 7, 2019 and endorsed by Resolution #150/19. 4.11 Other Natural Heritage and Hydrologic Features There are no other natural heritage and hydrologic features and areas, other than significant woodlands, that have targets established in the ROP. In addition, the Pickering Official Plan also does not currently establish targets for these elements. In some instances watershed plans address the matter of specific targets for natural heritage and hydrologic features and areas. Implementing specific targets for various natural heritage and hydrologic features and areas could help drive stewardship programs across the Region. In response to Question 12, staff recommends that if the Region decides to include targets for other natural heritage and hydrologic features in addition to woodlands in the ROP, that they consult with the conservation authorities and other appropriate experts. 4.12 Minimum Vegetation Protection Zone A Vegetation Protection Zone (VPZ) is a vegetated buffer area surrounding a key natural heritage feature or a key hydrologic feature within which only those land uses permitted within the feature itself are permitted. Provincial policy prohibits development and site alteration in the Vegetation Protection Zone, unless the ecological function of the VPZ has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that there will be no negative impacts on the natural features or on their ecological functions. The ROP identifies the general location of key natural heritage and/or hydrologic features and establishes policies that require appropriate setbacks to be determined through an Environmental Impact Study prepared in support of a development application and in consultation with the conservation authority. Area municipal official plans and zoning by-laws provide greater detail on individual features and their associated vegetation protection zones. The Pickering Official Plan schedules identify the location of key natural heritage and key hydrologic features. Policies in the Pickering Official Plan establish minimum vegetation protection zones related to these key natural heritage and key hydrologic features. In addition, there are policies in the Pickering Official Plan that address the requirements of an environmental impact assessment as it relates to development proposals within and outside of the minimum vegetation protection zone. The results of the detailed environmental impact assessment may further refine the boundaries of the minimum vegetation protection zone. -37- Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 15 of 20 In response to Question 13, staff suggests that the Region leave it to the local area municipalities to include the more detailed policies prescribing minimum vegetation protection zones in their official plans. 4.13 Natural Heritage System: Overlay or Designation? The PPS requires the protection of natural features and areas for the long term. Natural Heritage Systems, which are made up of these natural features and areas, and linkages, that are intended to provide connectivity (at the regional or site level) and to support natural processes which are necessary to maintain biological and geological diversity, natural functions, viable populations of indigenous species, and ecosystems, must be identified and maintained or, where possible enhanced. The Major Open Space System within the ROP establishes the framework for connectivity at the regional scale. Through Envision Durham, the Region will be updating its policies and mapping to reflect the updates to the Greenbelt Plan and A Place to Grow as they relate to natural heritage systems. The Region will also determine whether the Region should adopt an overlay approach or a separate land -use designation to protect the natural heritage system and key natural heritage and key hydrologic features and areas. Policies of the Pickering Official Plan address the existing and future needs of the City's ecological systems. In particular these policies promote environmental stewardship and the protection, conservation and enhancement of the City's natural heritage features and functions. The Schedules in the Pickering Official Plan identify the Natural Heritage System and key natural heritage and key hydrologic features. Through the City's Official Plan Amendment 27 (OPA 27), it was decided to adopt an "overlay" as opposed to a "designate" approach. OPA 27 effectively replaced wording from "designate" to "identify" in relation to key natural heritage and key hydrological features in order to support the "overlay" approach. The "overlay" approach acknowledges the evolving nature of key natural heritage and key hydrologic features. In response to Question 14, staff recommends that the Region adopt an "overlay" approach to identifying where key natural heritage and key hydrologic features form a component of the Natural Heritage System at the regional level. Further, staff recommends that appropriate policy language should be included to allow for adjustments to the overlay where it is deemed appropriate by lower -tier municipalities in consultation with their conservation authorities through various means, such as site specific environmental impact studies, without the need for amendments to the ROP. In addition, staff recommends that the Region should have an upper -tier level Natural Heritage System that primarily reflects the Provincial Natural Heritage System, and encourage area municipalities to maintain their own established natural heritage systems. -38- Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 16 of 20 4.14 Wildland Fire Hazards The PPS includes a new requirement that development be directed outside of areas considered unsafe, due to the presence of hazardous forest types for wildland fire, unless mitigation measures are implemented. Through Envision Durham, the Region will be adding policy to conform to the PPS. The Pickering Official Plan contains risk management policies which emphasize the need to manage flood plains, areas prone to erosion and slope instability, contaminated soils, abandoned oil and gas wells, and noise, odour, and other emissions in a manner that protects people and property from potentially hazardous conditions and situations, while protecting environmental resources and systems. A key component of the City's approach is to direct development away from areas of natural or human -made hazards where there is an unacceptable risk to public health, safety or property. There are currently no specific policies, or mapping, in the Pickering Official Plan that address, or identify, areas of potential of hazardous forest types for wildland fire. In considering policies and/or mapping and/or a requirement for consideration of forest fire hazards as part of the preparation of environmental impact studies, the Region should consider using the mapping of areas of potential of hazardous forest types for wildland fire as a screening tool for identification, awareness and education. This proposed screening tool could be used to help inform development decisions. In addition, the Region should consider including policies that would apply a consistent approach to mitigation and appropriate mitigation measures. In response to Question 15, staff recommends that in considering policies and/or mapping related to wildland fire hazards, the Region identify areas of potential for hazardous forest types for wildland fire to be used as a screening tool to inform development decisions as well as for awareness and education. Additionally, staff recommends that the Region consider including wildland fire hazard policies in the ROP in order to apply a consistent approach to mitigation as well as appropriate mitigation measures. This could be similar to the existing approach used for the protection of water resources from high risk land uses within a high aquifer vulnerable area in an Urban Area where a Contamination Management Plan may be required. 4.15 Environmental Protection The long-term protection and conservation of natural heritage within the Region is supported through a range of tools such as, stewardship, and land acquisition by easement, donation or purchase. The ROP currently contains policies that provide guidance on who can acquire land and for what purpose they can acquire it (such as for conservation purposes, public agencies, utility providers etc.). The Durham Region Land Acquisition Funding Policy for Conservation Authorities, established by Regional Council in 2007, provides both funding and guidance when acquiring lands for natural heritage conservation purposes. -39- Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 17 of 20 The Pickering Official Plan contains policies that facilitate the conveyance of lands to public bodies or non-profit entities for natural heritage conservation. In response to Question 16, staff recommends that the Region keep the current policies in the ROP that provide guidance on the conveyance of land for natural heritage conservation as they adequately address the matter. 4.16 Environmental Impact Study An Environmental Impact Study (EIS) is a technical report prepared by an environmental expert in support of a development application or public infrastructure project. ROP policies establish the circumstances when an EIS is required and the scope of the contents of the report. The Pickering Official Plan also addresses the requirement for and content of environmental reports. In response to Question 17, staff recommends that the Region consider implementing policies that provide additional detail regarding the requirements for an EIS that include, but are not limited to, the requirement that an EIS describe: • the mitigation, improvement and restoration measures to be used to address the environmental conditions to ensure that the proposed development or site alteration will have no adverse impacts on the natural heritage system or its related ecological functions; • the location and extent of the environmental features and functions that should be preserved; and • the recommendations for appropriate buffers between the area of development or site alteration. 4.17 Land Use Compatibility Land use compatibility is a term that refers to minimizing adverse effects on a community that could be caused by industrial, transportation, or other land uses that may emit noise, odour and/or air pollution proximal to sensitive land uses. Sensitive land uses include residential, institutional, parkland and agricultural uses. The ROP includes general policies regarding land use compatibility. Typically, land use compatibility is assessed through development applications using the Province's D-6 Compatibility between Industrial Facilities guidelines (D-6 Guidelines). The D-6 Guidelines classifies industrial uses based on factors such as: type of production, emissions and traffic, with an associated minimum separation distance from sensitive uses. In response to Question 18, staff recommends that the Region consider enhancing its definition of "sensitive uses" and including more detailed assessment information within the ROP. This assessment information could be in the form of a guideline document or appendix to the ROP. -40- Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 18 of 20 4.18 Climate Change Climate Change is defined as a significant change in long-term weather patterns including a rise in temperature, wind patterns, and precipitation that occurs over time. These changes can result in impacts such as floods, droughts, and severe weather events that impact the region. The natural environment plays a critical role in climate change adaptation and mitigation. 4.18.1 Economic and Social Sectors Impacted by Climate Change The Region's Climate Change and Sustainability Discussion Paper, May 2019 identifies seven economic and social sectors of where and how climate shifts impacts are being felt, as follows: Agriculture, Ecological Integrity, Forestry, Power Generation, Public Health, Tourism, and Transportation. Staff have identified other sectors, or subsectors of the above, that are being affected by climate change: Fisheries, Finance and Insurance, Infrastructure, Mental Health, Vulnerable Populations, Organizational Risk Management and Emergency Preparedness, Summer Recreation, Urban Tree Canopy Health (a subset of ecological integrity). The details of these sectors are more fully described in Report PLN 21-19, dated October 7, 2019. In response to Question 19, staff recommends that the Region recognize the following additional sectors as being impacted by climate change: fisheries; finance and insurance; infrastructure; mental health; vulnerable populations; organizational risk management and emergency preparedness; summer recreation; and urban tree canopy health. 4.18.2 Climate Change Objectives The Envision Durham exercise provides an opportunity to explore various considerations, including: • A lens for considering specific climate change adaptation and mitigation measures • Provincial requirements that can be incorporated in the ROP; and • Appropriate land use planning -related recommendations from Regionally -led climate change plans and reports The City has been participating in various Regional climate change initiatives, including the preparation of The Durham Community Climate Adaptation Plan and the Durham Community Energy Plan. Additionally, through Amendment 23 to the Pickering Official Plan, the City included a number of policies addressing energy conservation, climate change, use of green technologies and renewable energy systems, the urban forest, designing for resiliency, heat islands, and climate adaptation. Staff supports the concept of a climate changes lens for policy setting and decision making, and believe that mitigation measures should include both regulatory measures, and incentives that encourage eco -friendly practices. - 41 - Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 19 of 20 The City's vision for climate change and adaptation for Durham is a holistic approach based on a framework for sustainability. Policies about climate change should address the following objectives: healthy environment; healthy economy; healthy society; responsible development; and responsible consumption. In addition, in consideration of policies related to climate change, the Region should consider methods, techniques and best practices for adaptation, mitigation and resiliency. Also in response to Question 19, staff recommends that the Region understand that the City's vision for climate change and adaptation for Durham is a holistic approach based on a framework for sustainability, wherein policies about climate change should address the following objectives: healthy environment; healthy economy; healthy society; responsible development; and responsible consumption. Further, staff recommends that the Region consider implementing policies that address the changing climate and methods, techniques and best practices for adaptation, mitigation and resiliency in the Regional Official Plan. 4.18.3 Climate Change Advocacy Role The Region, together with its area municipalities, can play a key educational role in working with all facets of the development industry to stress the importance of improving overall water and energy efficiencies, resiliency of new buildings, the importance of recycling and re -using construction material. Additionally, the Region and area municipalities across the Province have a chance to influence the Province to continually improve Ontario Building Code standards with respect to climate change mitigation and adaptation. Staff recommends that the Region introduce a policy in the ROP identifying the advocacy role that it can play in adapting to climate change in collaboration with all levels of government and a wide variety of stakeholders. These recommendations related to climate change are consistent with Council's comments on the Climate Change and Sustainability Discussion Paper contained in Report PLN 21-19, dated October 7, 2019 and endorsed by Resolution #150/19. 4.19 Rouge National Urban Park Through the adoption of Official Plan Amendment 27 to the Pickering Official Plan, policies and mapping related to the Rouge National Urban Park were updated to conform to the Central Pickering Development Plan and federal land transfers to expand the Park, and to assist and cooperate with Parks Canada to further the objectives of the Rouge National Urban Park Management Plan. Also in response to Question 19, staff recommends that the Region recognize the Rouge National Urban Park and its management objectives in the new Regional Official Plan. This recommendation is consistent with Council's comments on the Agricultural and Rural System Discussion Paper contained in Report PLN 13-19, dated May 6, 2019 and endorsed by Resolution #94/19. -42- Staff Review of the Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Page 20 of 20 5.0 Conclusion The above review provides a synopsis of the Region's Environment & Greenlands Discussion Paper, answers questions, and highlights staff recommendations for consideration through the MCR process. -43- Attachment #1 to Report #PLN 04-20 Overview of the Region of Durham's Municipal Comprehensive Review of its Official Plan 1. Background The Planning Act requires that municipal official plans be reviewed every five years to ensure that the plans have regard to matters of Provincial interest, are consistent with Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), and conform to Provincial Land Use Plans. The current Durham Regional Official Plan (ROP) was approved in 1993 and has over 150 amendments to keep it up-to-date with changing provincial plans and policies. On May 2, 2018, Regional Council authorized staff to proceed with the Municipal Comprehensive Review (MCR) of the ROP titled "Envision Durham, 2041 Our Region, Our Plan, Our Future" (or "Envision Durham"). "Envision Durham" offers a strategic opportunity to create a completely new plan with an advanced planning vision for the Region to 2041. 1.1 What are the key components of the Region's MCR? The MCR is structured around the following strategic planning themes: • The Agriculture and Rural System (Discussion Paper released March 5, 2019; Pickering Council commented through Council Resolution #94/19, dated May 27, 2019); • Climate Change and Sustainability (Discussion Paper released May 7, 2019; Pickering Council commented through Council Resolution #150/19, dated October 21, 2019); • Growth Management (Urban System Discussion Paper released June 4, 2019; Pickering Council commented through Council Resolution #631/19, dated December 16, 2019); • Environment and Greenlands System (subject of this Report; to be considered at the March 2, 2020 Planning & Development Committee and the March 23, 2020 Council meeting); • Transportation System (released October 1, 2019; to be considered at the April 6, 2020 Planning & Development Committee, and April 27, 2020 Council meeting); and • Housing (released December 3, 2019; under review). 1.2 The MCR and Public Engagement The public engagement program and its timeline associated with the MCR consists of four stages: Discover (2019), Discuss (2019), Direct (2020), and Draft (2021-2022). On February 5, 2019, the Region initiated the first stage ("Discover") of the "Envision Durham" public engagement program by launching the project website: durham.ca/Envision Durham, as well as a public opinion survey, which closed on April 6, 2019. The Region also created an introductory video on the project, which can be viewed on the project website. In addition, the Region set up "pop-up" information kiosks in various locations, as part of their public engagement launch. In accordance with the public engagement program, each stage of the project will be promoted through news releases, the project website, social media platforms, and public service announcements. -44-