Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJanuary 13, 2020City 6h DICKERING Planning & Development Committee Meeting Agenda January 13, 2020 Council Chambers — 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Cumming Page 1. Disclosure of Interest 2. Statutory Public Meetings Statutory Public Meetings are open to the public to receive input and feedback on certain types of planning applications. In accordance with the City's Procedure By-law, anyone wishing to make a delegation before the Committee for an item listed under the Statutory Public Meetings section of the agenda, is not required to register in advance and will be given an opportunity to speak. 2.1 Information Report No. 01-20 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 13/19 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP -2019-03 Draft Plan of Condominium Application CP -2019-04 10046043 Canada Inc. & C. Wang Lots 14, 29 and 30, Part of Lots 22 to 26 Plan 818, Part 4 of 40R-29018, Part 1 of 40R-29545, Part 2 of 40R-30489 and Part 1 of 40R-30492 (1950 & 1952 Fairport Road) 2.2 Information Report No. 02-20 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 12/19 A., I. & S. Doria Part of Lot 29, Broken Front Range 3, Part 1 on 40R-5415 & Parts 2 to 5 on 40R-5809 (698 & 682 Kingston Road) 3. Delegations 1 16 In accordance with the City's Procedure By-law, individuals who would like to appear as a delegation for any Items not related to Statutory Public Meetings, must register with the City Clerk by 12:00 noon on the day of the meeting. Please visit www.pickering.ca/delegation to register. 4. Planning & Development Reports 4.1 Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor, Report LEG 01-20 Lebovic Enterprises Limited — Plan of Subdivision 40M-2479 - Final Assumption of Plan of Subdivision - Lots 1 to 30, Blocks 31 to 50, 52, 53 and 54, Plan 40M-2479 - Parts 1, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, 40R-26332 (William Jackson Drive) 27 For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca Cty oh DICKERING Planning & Development Committee Meeting Agenda January 13, 2020 Council Chambers — 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Cumming Recommendation: 1. That William Jackson Drive, Earl Grey Avenue, Carousel Drive, Tally Street, Carousel Mews, Calico Mews, Starboard Mews within Plan 40M-2479 and William Jackson Drive within Parts 1, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, 40R-26332 be assumed for public use; 2. That the works and services required by the Subdivision Agreement within Plan 40M-2479 and Parts 1, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, 40R-26332, which are constructed, installed or located on lands dedicated to, or owned by the City, or on lands lying immediately adjacent thereto, including lands that are subject to easements transferred to the City, be accepted and assumed for maintenance, save and except for Block 51; 3. That Lebovic Enterprises Limited be released from the provisions of the Subdivision Agreement and any amendments thereto relating to Plan 40M-2479 and Parts 1, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, 40R-26332, save and except from Block 51; and, 4. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. 4.2 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 01-20 Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study Planning Options Report (Phase 2 Report) Recommendation: 1. That the Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods, Planning Options Report (Phase 2 Report) prepared by SGL Planning & Design Inc., dated December 2019, be received; and, 2. That Council authorize City Development staff to proceed with Phase 3 of the Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study. 5. Other Business 6. Adjournment 31 For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca 64 �f DICKERING Information Report to Planning & Development Committee Report Number: 01-20 Date: January 13, 2020 From: Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Chief Planner Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 13/19 Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP -2019-03 Draft Plan of Condominium Application CP -2019-04 10046043 Canada Inc. & C. Wang Lots 14, 29 and 30, Part of Lots 22 to 26 Plan 818, Part 4 of 40R-29018, Part 1 of 40R-29545, Part 2 of 40R-30489 and Part 1 of 40R-30492 (1950 & 1952 Fairport Road) 1. Purpose of this Report The purpose of this report is to provide preliminary information regarding applications for Zoning By-law Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision, and Draft Plan of Condominium, submitted by 10046043 Canada Inc. & C. Wang, to facilitate an infill residential development. This report contains general information on the applicable Official Plan and other related policies, and identifies matters raised to date. This report is intended to assist members of the public and other interested stakeholders to understand the proposal. The Planning & Development Committee will hear public delegations on the applications, ask questions of clarification, and identify any planning issues. This report is for information and no decision is being made at this time. Staff will bring forward a recommendation report for consideration by the Planning & Development Committee upon completion of a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal. 2. Property Location and Description The subject lands comprise two properties located on the west side of Fairport Road, south of Taplin Drive, having a combined area of approximately 2.42 hectares with approximately 40 metres of frontage along Fairport Road and 3.0 metres of frontage along Taplin Drive (see Location Map, Attachment #1). The subject lands currently contain two detached dwellings that are proposed to be demolished. The westerly portion of the subject lands are environmentally sensitive lands forming part of the Dunbarton Creek valley lands (see Air Photo Map, Attachment #2). In 2015, the previous landowner of 1952 Fairport Road removed a significant number of trees from the property, 20 of which were within the City of Pickering's Tree Protection Area (By-law 6108/03). An order was issued requiring the previous landowner to rehabilitate the lands and to replant 100 trees within the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority screening area or in an area approved under a development agreement between the landowner and the City of Pickering. The order to comply was issued to the previous landowner and does not apply to the current owner. However, the new landowner has indicated that they will replant the 100 trees within the required buffer area. - 1 - Information Report No. 01-20 Page 2 Surrounding land uses include: North: Immediately to the north are existing detached dwellings fronting onto Taplin Drive. East and Immediately to the east and south are detached dwellings fronting onto South: Fairport Road. West: To the west is Dunbarton Creek and associated valley lands and significant woodlands. Further west are detached dwellings fronting onto the east side of Spruce Hill Road. 3. Applicants' Proposal The applicants have submitted applications for Zoning By-law Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision, and Draft Plan of Condominium to facilitate an infill residential development (see Submitted Concept Plan, Attachment #3). The Draft Plan of Subdivision proposes to create a total of seven blocks summarized in the table below (see Submitted Draft Plan of Subdivision, Attachment #4): Lot/Block Number Land Area Proposed Use Lots 1, 2 and 3 0.14 hectares 3 freehold lots for detached dwellings fronting Fairport Road Block 4 1.53 hectares Common element condominium development block Block 5 0.72 hectares Dunbarton Creek and associated valley lands and buffer to be conveyed to public ownership and rezoned to an appropriate open space zone category. Block 6 0.03 hectares Future development Block 7 0.003 hectares Road widening Total 2.423 hectares Within Block 4, the applicants are proposing a residential common element condominium development consisting of 27 detached dwellings fronting onto an internal private road from Fairport Road. Vehicular access to the internal private road will be provided through a full -movement access from the west side of Fairport Road. A 1.5 metre wide pedestrian walkway is proposed along one side of the private road. The application for Draft Plan of Condominium will establish the common elements of the proposal. The common element features include: the private road; the sidewalk; the visitor parking spaces; the community mailboxes; the water meter room; and the small outdoor amenity area located at the southwest portion of the development where below grade stormwater management facilities that drain into the creek are located (see Submitted Draft Plan of Condominium, Attachment #5). 2 Information Report No. 01-20 Page 3 As noted above, Lots 1, 2 and 3 are freehold lots for detached dwellings fronting Fairport Road are proposed with a minimum lot frontage of 13.7 metres. The applicants are exploring the opportunity to convey Block 6 to the adjacent landowners along Taplin Road, immediately to the east and/or west. Currently, the submitted Draft Plan of Subdivision identifies Block 6 as a future development block, which is not included in the current development proposal. The applicants have no plans for active use of the lands, including a pedestrian connection to Taplin Drive. The table below summarizes the key details of the proposal and the requested zoning development standards: Provision Lots fronting internal private road Lots fronting Fairport Road Lot Area Ranging between 372 square metres and 500 square metres Ranging between 438 square metres and 512 square metres Lot Frontage Ranging between 12.0 metres and 14.4 metres Ranging between 13.7 metres and 16 metres Building Height Maximum 9.0 metres Dwelling Area Between 230 to 325 square metres Front Yard Setback Minimum 4.5 metres Minimum 6.0 metres Side Yard Setbacks Minimum 1.2 metres on one side and 0.6 metres on the other side Rear Yard Setbacks Minimum 7.5 metres Coverage Maximum 38 percent Vehicular Parking (minimum) Resident: 4 spaces per unit (2 spaces within a garage and 2 spaces on the driveway) Visitor: 7 spaces at a minimum rate of 0.25 spaces per dwelling unit Resident: 4 spaces per unit (2 spaces within a garage and 2 spaces on the driveway) With the exception of the 3 lots fronting Fairport Road, the development will be subject to site plan approval. 3 Information Report No. 01-20 Page 4 4. Policy Framework 4.1 Durham Regional Official Plan The Regional Official Plan designates the subject lands as "Living Areas". Lands in the "Living Areas" designation shall be used predominately for housing purposes. The Plan also states that lands within the Living Areas designation shall be developed in a compact urban form through higher densities and by intensifying and redeveloping existing areas, particularly along arterial roads. Fairport Road is designated as a Type 'C' Arterial Road. Type 'C' Arterial Roads are designed to carry lower volumes of traffic, at slower speeds; provide access to properties; and generally have a right-of-way width ranging from 26 to 30 metres. The proposal generally conforms to the Durham Regional Official Plan. 4.2 Pickering Official Plan The Pickering Official Plan designates the developable portion of the subject lands as "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" (Lots 1, 2 and 3, and Blocks 4 and 6) within the Dunbarton Neighbourhood. This designation provides for housing and related uses at a residential density of up to and including 30 units per net hectare. The proposal will result in a residential density of approximately 18 units per net hectare, which falls within the permitted density range. The portion of the subject lands containing the Dunbarton Creek and associated valley lands and buffers are designated as "Open Space System — Natural Areas". The Natural Areas land use designation is further identified as "Significant Woodlands". An Environmental Impact Study is required for any proposed development within 120 metres of a key natural heritage or key hydrologic feature. The purpose of the Study is to identify and evaluate the natural heritage features and hydrologic feature, determine the minimum required vegetation protection zones, and determine the site's development limits to prevent potential negative impacts from the proposed development on the natural heritage features. The Official Plan states that in establishing performance standards, regard shall be had to protecting and enhancing the character of established neighbourhoods by considering matters such as building height, yard setbacks, lot coverage, access to sunlight, parking provisions and traffic implications. The Official Plan also states that where new development is proposed within an existing neighbourhood or established area, City Council shall encourage building design that reinforces and complements existing built patterns such as form, massing, height proportion, position relative to the street, and building area to site ratio. The policies for the Dunbarton Neighbourhood also states that in the established residential area between Spruce Hill Road and Appleview Road, including Fairport Road and Dunbarton Road, development should be encouraged and where possible, required to be compatible with the character of the existing neighbourhood. - 4 - Information Report No. 01-20 Page 5 The applicants' proposal will be assessed against the policies and provisions of the Official Plan and the Dunbarton Neighbourhood policies during the further processing of the applications. 4.3 Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines The Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines are intended to ensure redevelopment of lands central to the neighbourhood are consistent with the existing neighbourhood while protecting the Dunbarton Creek. The design guidelines indicate that development along existing roads (Fairport Road) is permitted for detached dwellings with minimum lot frontages of 13.5 metres. New development on proposed internal roads is permitted, subject to the following requirements: • permit only detached dwellings • require minimum lot frontages of 12.0 metres, and • maintain building setbacks consistent with recent subdivision standards (front yard minimums of 4.5 metres; side yard minimums of 0.6/1.2 metres) The proposed meets the requirements of the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines. 4.4 Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study The City has retained SGL Planning and Design Inc. (SGL) to undertake the Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study (the Study), which looks at how to guide the future evolution of the City's established neighbourhoods by recommending an appropriate scale of infill and replacement housing, and how the City can ensure that neighbourhood character is properly considered through the development and building approval processes. The Dunbarton Neighbourhood is one of nine "Focus Neighbourhoods" that are the subject of the Study. The subject site is within an area identified within the Study as an "Area of Observed Change", indicating that there has been a significant amount of change observed in the form of new construction related to either infill and/or replacement housing within this area. The Study is examining these "Areas of Observed Change" and exploring how to sensitively manage future development so that it is appropriately sympathetic to the existing neighbourhood character. The Study is currently in Phase 2 of a three phase project. 4.5 Zoning By-law The subject lands are currently zoned "R4" — Residential within Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, which permits one detached dwelling per lot. The applicants are requesting to rezone the developable portion of the subject lands to an appropriate residential zone category with site-specific performance standards to facilitate the proposal. The lands associated with the Dunbarton Creek, including the required buffer lands, are to be rezoned to "OS" — Open Space Areas. 5 Information Report No. 01-20 Page 6 5. Comments Received 5.1 Public Comments from public open house and written submissions On January 10, 2019, the City received a petition from a coalition of residents within the Dunbarton Neighbourhood in opposition to the future development of 1950 and 1952 Fairport Road. The coalition group submitted the petition in opposition of a land division application to sever the rear of 1966 Fairport Road, to facilitate the future infill development of 1950 and 1952 Fairport Road. The concerns of the coalition are included in the list below. As of the date of this report, the City has received 9 written comments from the public. On November 21, 2019, a Public Open House meeting was hosted by the City Development Department to inform area residents about the development proposal. The following is a list of key comments and concerns expressed by the area residents at the meeting, and written comments received: 5.1.1 Impact to the natural environment • concerned that the proposal will result in negative impacts to the existing natural features • concerned about the existing soil contamination along the creek • concerned that the infill development will cause future flooding • commented that the lots fronting Taplin Road slope at the rear and all runoff is drained to 1952 Fairport Road; therefore, the developer must ensure the stormwater management system has the capacity to collect the runoff on-site • questioned how the developer will prevent run-off from neighbouring properties and rainfall events from going into the creek • questioned whether a study was completed on the species at risk or the existing wildlife • questioned how the developer would prevent residents (i.e., children) from trespassing into the environmentally sensitive lands • concerned the environmental studies completed are not accurate; therefore, they should be peer reviewed or a second study by the conservation authority should be completed • concerned the proposed stormwater management system will be overwhelmed during a major storm event, causing untreated water to flow into the creek 5.1.2 Tree Removal • commented that the previous land owner of 1952 Fairport Road removed a large number of trees • questioned what the City did about the tree removal • concerned more trees will be removed from the subject lands and from neighbouring properties 5.1.3 Traffic and access • proposed development will further increase traffic congestion along Fairport Road • commented that there is currently a lack of safety measures to reduce traffic speeds along Fairport Road - 6 - Information Report No. 01-20 Page 7 • questioned the number of residential and visitor parking spaces provided and whether sufficient visitor parking is provided to support the development • concerned that there will be spillover of visitor cars on Fairport Road from this development • concerned emergency vehicles will have difficulty navigating the site from the private laneway because of cars parked in undesignated spots 5.1.4 Other comments • concerned the proposed infill development is incompatible with the neighbourhood and will result in a loss of character and allure • questioned if the proposed development was circulated to the school boards as existing schools are at capacity • proposed that the development should include the rears of properties along Taplin Road for a comprehensive infill development • questioned the location and size of the snow storage area • commented that the existing homes are experiencing water pressure issues which will be further decreased by this infill development • concerned the developer will increase the number of proposed dwellings if the development limit can be increased • questioned the purpose of the 3.0 metre wide strip fronting Taplin Road and who will be responsible for its maintenance • concerned the 3.0 metre wide strip fronting Taplin Road will be used as a pedestrian corridor into the open space block • concerned about the construction noise and the noise from air conditioner units installed at the new dwellings 5.2 Agency Comments 5.2.1 Region of Durham As of writing this report, no comments have been received from the Region of Durham. 5.2.2 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is generally satisfied with the development limits and recommends a resubmission of technical reports and studies to address the key comments and concerns listed below: • recommends the proposed Open Space Block be conveyed to the City of Pickering • require fencing between the Open Space Block and the Low Density Condominium Block to gates • installation of gates or other access through the fence along the lot line should be prohibited through a restrictive covenant or other legal mechanism • the Concept Plan drawing should be revised to include the stable top of bank, dripline and associated 10.0 metre buffer 7 Information Report No. 01-20 Page 8 • require further clarification on how the groundwater at the proposed foundation drain collectors will be treated to meet Regional standards before discharging into watercourse • confirmation on who will be responsible for the maintenance of the Stormwater Management system • confirmation on the grading plan that the proposed grading and infrastructure are located outside the 10.0 metre buffer from the dripline • the buffer area shall be planted with native species as proposed in the Environmental Impact Study • detailed headwall design and footprint, erosion and sediment control plan, and the Stormwater Management design will be reviewed at the site plan stage • agree with the recommendations of the hydrogeological report regarding the installation of monitoring wells to observe static water levels • no concerns with the 100 -year peak flows being over controlled to the 2 -year pre -development, provided the City is in agreement • the hydrogeology report and functional servicing report need to assess and determine a safe setback for proposed Low Impact stormwater management facilities close to the valley lands • confirmation is required from the City whether a new outfall is necessary or whether the site can drain to the City sewer system 5.2.3 Engineering Services Department As of writing this report, no comments have been received from the City of Pickering's Engineering Services Department. 5.2.4 Durham District School Board • Durham District School Board has no objections with the proposed development • students generated from this development will attend existing school facilities 5.2.5 Durham Catholic District School Board • Durham Catholic District School Board has no objections with the proposed development • students generated from this development will attend St. Elizabeth Seton Catholic Elementary School and St. Mary Catholic Secondary School 6. Planning & Design Section Comments The following matters have been identified by staff for further review and consideration prior to a final recommendation report to Planning & Development Committee: • ensuring conformity with the City's Official Plan, Dunbarton Neighbourhood policies and Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines • ensuring the proposal has regard for the ongoing Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study • ensuring the limit of development and other technical requirements are to the satisfaction of the City and the TRCA - 8 - Information Report No. 01-20 Page 9 • ensuring appropriate zoning performance standards are implemented to facilitate dwelling designs that are in keeping with the character of the surround residential community • evaluating the design and geometry of the private road network to ensure turning movements can accommodate municipal garbage collections and fire trucks • ensuring sufficient visitor parking is provided on-site to support this development • ensuring the amenity area is in an appropriate location and of sufficient size • determining whether wider side yards should be required on Lots 1 to 3, fronting Fairport Road • mitigating any potential negative impacts to the Natural Heritage System adjacent to the proposed development by establishing a natural buffer for Dunbarton Creek and associated valley lands, to the satisfaction of the TRCA • ensuring the proposal will not alter or negatively impact the grading and drainage of the abutting residential properties along Taplin Drive and Fairport Road • ensuring the replanting of trees previously removed from the subject lands are replanted within the required buffer area • further issues may be identified following receipt and review of comments from the circulated departments, agencies and public The City Development Department will conclude its position on the applications after it has received and assessed comments from the circulated department, agencies and public. 7. Information Received Copies of the plans and studies listed below are available for viewing on the City's website at pickering.ca/devapp or in person at the offices of the City of Pickering, City Development Department: • Planning Justification Report, prepared by Brian Moss and Associates Ltd., dated August 2019 • Archaeological Assessment, prepared by This Land Archeology Inc., dated June 25, 2018 • Draft Concept Plan, prepared by Brian Moss and Associates Ltd., dated August 2019 • Draft Common Element Condominium Plan, prepared by Brian Moss and Associates Ltd., dated November 2018 • Draft Plan of Subdivision Plan, prepared by Brian Moss and Associates Ltd., dated 2018 • Environmental Impact Study, prepared by Beacon Environmental, dated April 2019 • Environmental Noise Assessment, prepared by YCA Engineering Limited, dated May 2019 • Waste Collection Plan, prepared by Candevcon Limited, dated May 6, 2019 • Fire Emergency Plan, prepared by Candevcon Limited, dated May 6, 2019 • Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, prepared by CDC Candevcon Limited, dated November 2018 • Geotechnical Investigation and Slope Stability Assessment, prepared by Alston Associates, dated April 2019 • Hydrogeological Review, prepared by Terrapex Environmental Ltd., dated May 30, 2019 • Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by Terrapex Environmental Ltd., dated July 19, 2019 - 9 Information Report No. 01-20 Page 10 • Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by Terrapex Environmental Ltd., dated July 19, 2019 • Traffic Assessment Study, prepared by Candevcon Limited, dated May 6, 2019 • Tree Inventory Plan, Details and List, prepared by Cosburn Nauboris Ltd, dated March 25, 2019 8. Procedural Information 8.1 General • written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the City Development Department • oral comments may be made at the Statutory Public Meeting • all comments received will be noted and used as input to a Recommendation Report prepared by the City Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Council or a Committee of Council • any member of the public who wishes to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision must provide comments to the City before Council enacts any by-law for this proposal • any member of the public who wishes to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal must request such in writing to the City Clerk 9. Owner/Applicant Information The owner of these properties are 10046043 Canada Inc. & C. Wang represented by Brian Moss and Associates Ltd. Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Air Photo Map 3. Submitted Concept Plan 4. Submitted Draft Plan of Subdivision 5. Submitted Draft Plan of Condominium Prepared By: Original Signed By: Tanjot Bal, MCIP, RPP Planner II Original Signed By: Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review & Urban Design TB:Id Date of Report: December 17, 2019 - 10 - Approved/Endorsed By: Original Signed By: Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Chief Planner Erin Gate Park Aspen Road Regal Cresc ent a) 0 0 d Attachment #1 to Information Report 01-20 Finch Avenue Taplin Drive D cannon R: vine 0 0) m W ill 0 J. Mcpherson ( Park a. 11 • • 1950 Subject Lands' Glenanna Road Gablehurst Crescent • E z 'r Dale ood Ravin 0 0 2 k Court City/ PICKERING City Development Department Location Map File: SP -2019-03, CP -2019-04 & A13-19 Applicant: 10046043 Canada Inc & C. Wang Property Description:Lt 14, 29 & 30, Pt Lots 22-26 Plan 818, Pt & Pt 2 40R-30489, Pt 3 40R-30492 (1950 & 1952 Fairport Rd) © The Corporation of the City 0 Pickenng Produced (n part) under license from. Q Queens Printer. Ontario Ministry 0 Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; © Teranet Enterprises Inc. and As suppliers all nghts reserved.;©operty Assessment Corporation and its suppliers aII rights reserved.: 4 40R-29018, Pt 1 40R-29545 Date: Dec. 16, 2019 SCALE: 1:4,000 THIS IS NOTA PLAN OF SURVEY L:\PLANNING\01-MapFlles\SP\2019\SP-2019-03, CP -2019-04 & A013-19 10046043 Canada Inc\SP-2019-03_LocationMap. mxd Attachment #2 to Information Report 01-20 F?egal Cre� - nt Finch Avenue Taplin Drive Aka 1 Linos memo rtow hiamita nattrim :aScl' r R A mitiillia iiiiiiiffill 316 JVIlallia ;MN � llllll�galg k.tace .Glenanna Road affix Millbank Road' 414 NAIL C Air Photo Map File: SP -2019-03, CP -2019-04 & A13-19 a/ PICKERING City Development Department Applicant: 10046043 Canada Inc & C. Wang Property Description: Lt 14, 29 & 30, Pt Lots 22-26 Plan 818, Pt 4 40R-29018, Pt 1 40R-29545 & Pt 2 40R-30489, Pt 3 40R-30492 (1950 & 1952 Fairport Rd) Date: Dec. 16, 2019 The Corporation of the City of Pickenng Produced (in part) under license from.© Queens Printer, Ontano Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© Her Majesty the Queen in Rlght of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; ©Teranet Enterprises Inc. and As suppliers all nghts reserved;© Mydaipflperty Assessment Corporation and its suppliers all rights reserved.: SALE. 1.4,000 THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY L:\PLANNING\01-MapFlles\SP\2019\SP-2019-03, CP -2019-04 8 A013-19 10046043 Canada Inc\SP-2019-03_AirPhoIo.mxd 1 Attachment #3 to Information Report 01-20 L:\Planning\01-Map F i les\S P\2019 ■ _- i_ _-- — f t: • • / Ian ' aam PPP -MAUI • Co r ..07.1% 13 i, • � 9FICc vSE EE7R4£ • 1 \ r BUILDING CC • likittL orf L� PRIVATE STREET 'A' CO e I 1 30., u 6� MAILBOX - - -_ I A ,. LOT 2 LOT 2.r:: FsPIRIMMill Submitted Concept Plan C4 4 File No: SP -2019-03, CP -2019-04 & A13-19 P 1 C K E R1 N G Applicant: 10046043 Canada Inc & C. Wang Property Description: Lt 14, 29 & 30, Pt Lots 22-26 Plan 818, Pt 4 40R-29018, Pt 1 40R-29545 & Pt 2 City Development 40R-30489, Pt 3 40R-30492 (1950 & 1952 Fairport Rd) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. w DATE: NOV 27, 2019 L:\Planning\01-Map F i les\S P\2019 ■ _- Attachment #4 to Information Report 01-20 L:\Planning\01-Map F i les\S P\2019 PUTU/�F p.V la h00k6 PA, T LOW rrB aoC -4 oryllivZII O O k?� Q aom 71 gp 11,� p EN SP ra.CkgCF Lot 1 a`) 4 x) xI Lot 2 Lot 3 0 Submitted Draft Plan of Subdivision C4 4 File No: SP -2019-03, CP -2019-04 & A13-19 P 1 C K E R1 N G Applicant: 10046043 Canada Inc & C. Wang Property Description: Lt 14, 29 & 30, Pt Lots 22-26 Plan 818, Pt 4 40R-29018, Pt 1 40R-29545 & Pt 2 City Development 40R-30489, Pt 3 40R-30492 (1950 & 1952 Fairport Rd) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Nov 27, 2019 L:\Planning\01-Map F i les\S P\2019 Attachment #5 to Information Report 01-20 L:\Planning\01-Map F i les\S P\2019 ■ f L 1 Legend ; - 2 21 22 24 23 i 25 20 Common Elements 19 R 199,, ,N 110 -chin] _7-- ej>1 18 �,,; A ;,,,` " � 14.E ` v T Jn] Y •..to° ti A -21a0.�� � c - As per City Standard P-812 ,� 17 16 9 0 _ Nw,r ._ 11 ` , u 13 12 10 9 7/5VE 26 27 -1 -1 Q 0 CC I- 15 cc B.Omx24m NITER Q_ METE? BUILDING cc J 9 E 14 c LJ_ 14 Z1,p]rpr.CUY 32,6 COWLINITY 0 1 , MICBOX 3 n • D' _ 1 0 7 I Submitted Draft Plan of Condominium C4 4 File No: SP -2019-03, CP -2019-04 & A13-19 P 1 C K E R1 N G Applicant: 10046043 Canada Inc & C. Wang Property Description: Lt 14, 29 & 30, Pt Lots 22-26 Plan 818, Pt 4 40R-29018, Pt 1 40R-29545 & Pt 2 City Development 40R-30489, Pt 3 40R-30492 (1950 & 1952 Fairport Rd) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Nov 27, 2019 L:\Planning\01-Map F i les\S P\2019 ■ 64 4 DICKERING Information Report to Planning & Development Committee Report Number: 02-20 Date: January 13, 2020 From: Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Chief Planner Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 12/19 A., I. & S. Doria Part of Lot 29, Broken Front Range 3, Part 1 on 40R-5415 & Parts 2 to 5 on 40R-5809 (698 & 682 Kingston Road) 1. Purpose of this Report The purpose of this report is to provide preliminary information regarding an application for Zoning By-law Amendment, submitted by Shell Canada Limited on behalf of A., I. & S. Doria, to permit the reconstruction of the existing automobile service station and associated automobile related and restaurant uses. This report contains general information on the applicable Official Plan and other related policies, and identifies matters raised to date. This report is intended to assist members of the public and other interested stakeholders to understand the proposal. The Planning & Development Committee will hear public delegations on the application, ask questions of clarification, and identify any planning matters. This report is for information and no decision is being made at this time. Staff will bring forward a recommendation report for consideration by the Planning & Development Committee upon completion of a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal. 2. Property Location and Description The subject lands are located at the northwest corner of Kingston Road and Whites Road within the Woodlands Neighbourhood. The subject lands comprise two properties (682 and 698 Kingston Road) having a combined area of approximately 0.73 of a hectare with approximately 62 metres of frontage along Whites Road and approximately 79 metres of frontage along Kingston Road (see Location Map, Attachment #1). The two properties are currently under separate ownership; however the properties function as a single site. A Shell service station containing 10 islands (20 pumps) and a vehicle repair shop currently occupies 698 Kingston Road. A Tim Horton's restaurant with a drive-through and an automatic car wash currently occupies 682 Kingston Road. Full movement access to and from the site is provided from Kingston Road and Whites Road (see Existing Site Layout, Attachment #2). - 16 - Information Report No. 02-20 Page 2 Surrounding land uses include (see Air Photo Map, Attachment #3): North: Dunbarton High School and associated sports facilities and fields, and a recently constructed residential development consisting of 92 stacked townhouses. East: South: West: Across Whites Road, an automobile service station and convenience store (Petro -Canada and 7 -Eleven) and a 6 -storey residential apartment building. Across Kingston Road, an existing commercial building occupied by National Sports, and further south is the Highway 401 eastbound on-ramp. Existing commercial development (Steeple Hill Shopping Centre) with various uses including, but not limited to restaurants, retail, grocery store, personal service uses and financial institution. 3. Applicant's Proposal Shell Canada Limited has submitted a rezoning application on behalf of the landowners requesting to repeal the two existing site-specific Zoning By-law Amendments (By-laws 1740/83 and 1825/84), and replace them with a new site-specific Zoning By-law to facilitate the redevelopment of the subject lands. As part of the redevelopment, the applicant is proposing to merge the two properties on title. The submitted conceptual site plan illustrates a new service station that consists of 8 islands (16 pumps) weather protected by a 5.3 metre high canopy. The proposed one -storey commercial building containing a retail store (which will also handle gas purchases) and a restaurant with a drive-through facility (Tim Horton's) will be located along the westerly portion of the site. The commercial building will have a gross floor area of approximately 323 square metres. The drive-through facility is proposed to be located along the north and west sides of the commercial building. The submitted plans illustrates approximately 4 automobile stacking spaces before the order boards and approximately 6 automobile stacking spaces between the order board and the pick-up window. The plans also illustrate a 2 -bay automatic car wash facility at the north end of the site. The site plan shows a vehicular stacking lane with a capacity for up to 9 vehicles for each bay (see Submitted Conceptual Site Plan, Attachment #4, and Submitted Elevations, Attachment #5). Restricted right -in and right -out vehicular access is proposed from Whites Road and Kingston Road. A total of 27 parking spaces are provided on-site, including two accessible parking spaces. The site plan indicates a minimum of 6 bicycle parking spaces being proposed to be located along the east side of the commercial building, and one loading space located on the north side of the commercial building. The conceptual site plan illustrates enhanced landscaping at the corner of Whites Road and Kingston Road. The applicant has indicated that they will work with the City to incorporate a public art piece at this corner. The development will be subject to site plan approval. - 17 - Information Report No. 02-20 Page 3 4. Policy Framework 4.1 Durham Regional Official Plan The Regional Official Plan designates the subject lands as "Urban System - Living Areas" with a "Regional Corridor" overlay along Kingston Road. Lands within this designation are to be planned and developed at higher densities and achieve a mix of commercial, residential, employment and institutional uses while supporting higher order transit services and pedestrian oriented development. The Regional Official Plan recognizes Whites Road as a Type 'A' Arterial Road and Kingston Road as Type `B' Arterial Road and a Rapid Transit Spine. Type 'A' Arterial Roads and Type `B' Arterial Roads are designed to carry large volumes of traffic at moderate to high speeds and should be developed to their fullest potential. Rapid Transit Spines are intended to facilitate inter -regional and inter -municipal services along arterial roads. They shall intersect with local transit services which shall provide for complementary higher densities, mixed uses, and buildings oriented towards the street to reduce walking distances to transit facilities. 4.2 Pickering Official Plan The City of Pickering's Official Plan designates the subject lands as "Mixed Use Areas — Mixed Corridors" within the Woodlands Neighbourhood. This designation is intended primarily for residential, retail, community, cultural and recreational uses at a scale serving the community. The Official Plan has additional policies related to retail gasoline outlets. The policies states that within the urban area or within a rural hamlet, City Council may approve a site specific zoning by-law with appropriate provisions and restrictions, to permit a retail gasoline outlet in any land use designation expect Open Space — Natural Areas, provided: • the retail gasoline outlet maintains the goals, objectives and policies of the City's Official Plan; • the retail gasoline outlet obtains access from an arterial road as identified on Schedule II of the City's Official Plan; • the retail gasoline outlet is not located adjacent to or opposite a school; • the number of retail gasoline outlets is limited to a maximum of 2 outlets within 100 metres of any intersection; and • the retail gasoline outlet will not adversely affect the safe and convenient movement of pedestrian and vehicular traffic. As noted earlier, 682 and 698 Kingston Road are two separate parcels under separate ownership, but function as an integrated site. The existing gas pumps and accessory retail kiosk are located on 698 Kingston Road, which does not directly abut Dunbarton High School to the north. - 18 - Information Report No. 02-20 Page 4 4.3 Zoning By-law 3036 682 and 698 Kingston Road are regulated by 2 separate site-specific zoning by-laws. 698 Kingston Road is zoned "CA(C)" within Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1740/83, which permits an automobile service station — type `C'. 682 Kingston Road is zoned "CN -1" within Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1825/84, which permits a car wash, a restaurant — type 'A', a vehicle repair shop and a vehicle sales or rental establishment. The rezoning application is a technical housekeeping amendment, which will repeal the existing site-specific zoning by-laws and replace them with a new site-specific by-law to facilitate the redevelopment of the existing service station and associated facilities and uses. 5. Comments Received 5.1 Resident Comments As of writing this report, no comments or concerns have been received. 5.2 City Department Comments 5.2.1 Engineering Services As of writing this report, no comments or concerns have been received. 5.3 Agency Comments 5.3.1 Region of Durham • The Region in principle has no objection with this application • The submitted Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment and Human Health and Ecological Assessment will be peer reviewed • Additional comments regarding servicing, transportation and transit will be provided at a later date 5.3.2 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) As of writing this report, no comments have been received from the TRCA. 5.3.3 Durham Catholic District School Board • Durham Catholic District School Board has no objections to the proposal 5.3.4 Durham District School Board • Durham District School Board has no objections to the proposal - 19 - Information Report No. 02-20 Page 5 6. Planning & Design Section Comments The following is a summary of key concerns/issues or matters of importance raised to date. These matters, and others identified through the circulation and detailed review of the proposal, are required to be addressed by the applicant prior to a final recommendation report to Planning & Development Committee: • ensuring conformity with the City's Official Plan policies • ensuring an appropriate landscape buffer and fencing are provided along the north lot line to mitigate any issues with respect to noise, specifically to the future residents immediately to the north • ensuring the architectural treatments of the buildings and structures are enhanced (e.g., increased building heights, raised wall extensions, glazing and canopies) given that the site is located at the intersection of two prominent arterial roads in the City • ensuring an enhanced level of landscaping is provided along Kingston Road and Whites Road (e.g., articulated trellis structures, wrought -iron fencing, seating, special paving and public art) • ensuring the proposed drive-through facility associated with the restaurant use provides for sufficient vehicle stacking Further issues may be identified following receipt and review of comments from the circulated departments, agencies and public. The City Development Department will conclude its position on the applications after it has received and assessed comments from the circulated department, agencies and public. 7. Information Received Copies of the plans and studies listed below are available for viewing on the City's website at pickering.ca/devapp or in person at the offices of the City of Pickering, City Development Department: • Planning Rationale Report, prepared by WSP, dated August 23, 2019 • Noise Impact Study, prepared by AECOM, dated May 15, 2019 • Traffic Operations Assessment, prepared by AECOM, dated August 19, 2019 • Civil, Landscape, Architectural and Electrical Drawings, prepared by AECOM, dated August 8, 2019 • Geotechnical Investigation Report, prepared by AECOM, dated June 28, 2019 • Human Health and Ecological Assessment, prepared by GHD, dated April 29, 2019 • Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by GHD • Stormwater Management Report, prepared by AECOM, dated September 2019 8. Procedural Information 8.1 General • written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the City Development Department • oral comments may be made at the Statutory Public Meeting • all comments received will be noted and used as input to a Recommendation Report prepared by the City Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Council or a Committee of Council -20- Information Report No. 02-20 Page 6 • any member of the public who wishes to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this proposal • any member of the public who wishes to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal must request such in writing to the City Clerk 9. Owner/Applicant Information The owner of these properties are A., I. & S. Doria, represented by WSP Canada Group Limited. Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Existing Site Layout 3. Air Photo Map 4. Submitted Conceptual Site Plan 5. Submitted Elevations Prepared By: Original Signed By: Tanjot Bal, MCIP, RPP Planner II Original Signed By: Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review & Urban Design TB:Id Date of Report: December 17, 2019 - 21 - Approved/Endorsed By: Original Signed By: Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Chief Planner Attachment #1 to Information Report 02-20 Sheppard Avenue Dunbarton High School Dunbarton Pool 0 0 Steep e Hill Dunfair Street Dunbarton High Subject School South Lands .••• • 682 s�or�oad Kingston Road ' Whites Road 0 698 Kingston Road r y AP\ Ng a /\ \ C Location Map File: Al2/19 a/ PICKERING City Development Department Applicant: A., I. &S. Doria Property Description: Pt Lot 29, BF Range 3, Now Pt 1, 40R-5415 & Now Pts 2-5, 40R-5809 (682 & 698 Kingston Rd) Date: Dec. 16, 2019 © The Corporation of the City 0 Pmken %Produced(inpart) under license from'.© Queens Printer. Ontario Min,ry 0 Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© Her Majesty the Queen in Rlght of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; © Teranet Enterprises Inc. and As suppliers all nghts reserved;© flapflperty Assessment Corporation and its suppliers all rights reserved. : SCALE. 1.4r000 THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY L:\PLANNING\01-MapFil es\A\2019\Al2-19- Shell Canada LtdC12_19_Lo ratio Map.mxd " Attachment #2 to Information Report 02-20 Ns. A j Vehicle Repair " Car Wash Shop • � - - "No u , III r-- .. r r Drive -throw • h 5(� �: __ .'' 1 i ITim Horton's� f ` 10 Islands (20 pumps), canopy and convenience store a. N..r\ , '� •*, on Road ` R c. r g Kingst _.-- Kingston Road 69 `' o`1 �I 682 King ` ot 111111,:,` ,. 1 , �Kngst Road_ 0A .._ ! - f _A\�� Existing Site Layout C44 File No: A 12/19 P 1 C K E R 1 N G Applicant: A., I. & S. Doria Property Description: Pt Lot 29, BF Range 3, Now Pt 1, 40R-5415 & Now Pts 2-5, 40R-5809 City Development (682 & 698 Kingston Rd) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. — w DATE: Dec 17, 2019 L:\Planning\01-Map F i les\A\2019 Attachment #3 to Information Report 02-20 APA ALT lI tF l 1E. -1 trilird � ] I i .l 2/— �ti t 167it al� �` � �gmberwood��_�,,,,,�'_�,E, Weyburn Square 43,..?sn®rm a.�i�gi�J�ri♦IiliVaRi.' 14l� \ ';' _ Shadybrook Drive , ' 'f. Dunfair Street f f 5! Subject Lands Cit, Air Photo Map File: Al2/19 a/ PICKERING City Development Department Applicant: A., I. & S. Doria Property Description: Pt Lot 29, BF Range 3, Now Pt 1, 40R-5415 & Now Pts 2-5, 40R-5809 (682 & 698 Kingston Rd) Date: Dec. 16, 2019 The Corporation of the City of Pickenng Produced Or part) under license from. © Queens Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. I rightsreserved.;© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; ©Teranet Enterprises Inc and its suppliers all dghts reserved.;© ffpal.aperty Assessment Corporation and its suppliers all rights reserved.; SCALE: ^ LEF1 C. 1 .5'000 THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY L: PLANNING\01-MapFileslA1201 MA 12-19 - Shell Canada LtdlAl2_19_AirPhotonud Attachment #4 to Information Report 02-20 LAPlanning a p F i l e s W \2019 a 2 -bay Automatic Car Wash _ i1 ® Vacuum Area Underground Fuel Tanks Facility N / 0 ,J rel Drive-through{ : • . a �_ + facility __ _, .6_ 723128aelgea_a_ Convenience store ' ---J: — t'` Service Station and attached 11 (16 pumps and canopy) Tim Horton's Restaurant(77 1 a oo -.> ". --6 r . o 11' i _,..-c• • IF • gm 0 Kingston Road Submitted Conceptual Site Plan 644 File No: A 12/19 PICKERING Applicant: A., I. & S. Doria Property Description: Pt Lot 29, BF Range 3, Now Pt 1, 40R-5415 & Now Pts 2-5, 40R-5809 City Development (682 & 698 Kingston Rd) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. w — DATE: NOV 19, 2019 LAPlanning a p F i l e s W \2019 Attachment #5 to Information Report 02-20 Proposed Convenience Store and Tim Horton's ALLMARLAA .CFEFRORF LOOPS BLACK FRAME -FINISH ALLPANUM WINDOWS Ma U.. RAINIED FRONT ELEVATION Proposed Service Station Canopy 111 EY 1200 120E TYE TE L Aar I w SELECt Ea_l ill 1� �r ALUMINUM MEOWS AND DOORS PAINTED RED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT GLOOM FLA. FRANC FRA61.1 CANOPY FASCIA IN SLELL WHNF CURVED FASCIA IN SHELL YELLOW INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED RED BAR -r DISPENSER NUMBERS DISPENSER, REFER TO CIVIL, TYR BOLLARD, REFER TO CIVIL TYF PUMP ISLAND, REFER Fn STRUCTURAL FRONT ELEVATION stew 1 71 Proposed Car Wash BAG!( ELEVATION FOAIT MITE ArZN rElt E..DNVAM6.44 OVENFLOWSGRPNI N.stwN�re IeEEE eviauoEU:ICIuewnLcuEYI Z LEFT ELEVATION re n.sTOrn u.uEFRONIT GIALUO PICKERING City Development Department Proposed Elevations File No: A 12/19 Applicant: A., I. & S. Doria Property Description: Pt Lot 29, BF Range 3, Now Pt 1, 40R-5415 & Now Pts 2-5, 40R-5809 (682 & 698 Kingston Rd) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Nov 25, 2019 L:\Planning\01-MapFiles\A\2019 -26- Shell Car Wash �ml , BAG!( ELEVATION FOAIT MITE ArZN rElt E..DNVAM6.44 OVENFLOWSGRPNI N.stwN�re IeEEE eviauoEU:ICIuewnLcuEYI Z LEFT ELEVATION re n.sTOrn u.uEFRONIT GIALUO PICKERING City Development Department Proposed Elevations File No: A 12/19 Applicant: A., I. & S. Doria Property Description: Pt Lot 29, BF Range 3, Now Pt 1, 40R-5415 & Now Pts 2-5, 40R-5809 (682 & 698 Kingston Rd) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Nov 25, 2019 L:\Planning\01-MapFiles\A\2019 -26- f 1 4 DICKERING Report to Planning & Development Committee Report Number: LEG 01-20 Date: January 13, 2020 From: Paul Bigioni Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor Subject: Lebovic Enterprises Limited - Plan of Subdivision 40M-2479 - Final Assumption of Plan of Subdivision - Lots 1 to 30, Blocks 31 to 50, 52, 53 and 54, Plan 40M-2479 - Parts 1, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, 40R-26332 (William Jackson Drive) - File: 40M-2479 Recommendation: 1. That William Jackson Drive, Earl Grey Avenue, Carousel Drive, Tally Street, Carousel Mews, Calico Mews, Starboard Mews within Plan 40M-2479 and William Jackson Drive within Parts 1, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, 40R-26332 be assumed for public use; 2. That the works and services required by the Subdivision Agreement within Plan 40M-2479 and Parts 1, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, 40R-26332, which are constructed, installed or located on lands dedicated to, or owned by the City, or on lands lying immediately adjacent thereto, including lands that are subject to easements transferred to the City, be accepted and assumed for maintenance, save and except for Block 51; 3. That Lebovic Enterprises Limited be released from the provisions of the Subdivision Agreement and any amendments thereto relating to Plan 40M-2479 and Parts 1, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, 40R-26332, save and except from Block 51; and, 4. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary actions as indicated in this report. Executive Summary: The City entered into a Subdivision Agreement with the above -noted developer for the development of the lands within Plan 40M-2479 together with lands lying outside the plan being Parts 1, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, 40R-26332. As all works and services within these plans have been completed to the satisfaction of City staff, it is appropriate to finalize the assumption of those lands save and except for Block 51. Financial Implications: Not Applicable Discussion: The City entered into a Subdivision Agreement with the above -noted developer for the development of the lands within Plan 40M-2479 together with lands lying outside the plan in the City's ownership being Parts 1, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, 40R-26332 (established as William Jackson Drive). As the developer has now completed all of the works and services to the satisfaction of City staff, it is appropriate to: (a) assume the roads and the works and services -27- LEG 01-20 January 13, 2020 Subject: Final Assumption of Plan of Subdivision 40M-2479 Page 2 within Plan 40M-2479 and Parts 1, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, 40R-26332, save and except for Block 51 which is an open space block in the ownership of TRCA; and (b) release Lebovic Enterprises Limited from the provisions of the Subdivision Agreement with the City and any amendments related thereto, as it relates to Lots 1 to 30, Blocks 31 to 50, 52, 53, 54, 40M-2479 and Parts 1, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, 40R-26332 only. Attachments: 1. Location Map — 40M-2479 Prepared By: Original Signed By: Brigitte Gawtrey, Law Clerk Legal Services PB:bg Approved/Endorsed By: Original Signed By: Paul Bigioni, Director Corporate Services & City Solicitor Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Original Signed By: Tony Prevedel, P.Eng. Chief Administrative Officer Recommendation approved: Chief Administrative Officer Director, City Development & CBO Director, Community Services Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor CORP0227-07/01 revised per: per: per: per: -28- Original Signed By Original Signed By Original Signed By Original Signed By LEG 01-20 January 13, 2020 Subject: Final Assumption of Plan of Subdivision 40M-2479 Page 3 Director, Engineering Services per: Director, Finance & Treasurer per: City Clerk per: CORP0227-07/01 revised -29- Original Signed By Original Signed By Original Signed By Attachment # 1 to Report LEG 01-20 Lots 1 to 30, Blocks 31 to 50, 52, 53, 54, 40M-2479 Brock Road Zents Drive mat MMUNI mow Mem 11111 Mai Carousel - Mews iWm Sli �m we ow WA NIS WINIIIII 111A 0:1 11111115,,li 1111110 ), ill111 N_4 - 11111011 cD000011 VIII II. - !CD-1111111111111=iiiiiiiThil 111.1111110.11a Wm' .11 Tal y Stree 11 O Carousel Drive 111 Parts 1, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, 40R-26332 N Rex Heath Drive `i'iiPiiiiii, Liatris Drive • Lil L C Location Map File: Subdivision Completion & Assumption b/ PICKE R1 NG City Development Department Applicant: Lebovic Enterprises Ltd. (Bradshaw) Property Description:Lots 1 to 30, Blocks 31 to 50, 52, 53, 54, 40M-2479 and Parts 1, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, 40R-26332 Date: Nov. 14, 2019 ©The Corporation of the City of Rlekenng Produced on part) under license from'. aQueens Punter, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources- All rights reserved.,© Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. Al rights reserved., © Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers all rights reserved .;©14191s�perly Assessment Corporation and its suppliers all rights reserved.', SCALE: .I �r000 THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY IS E Cfy �t DICKERING Report to Planning & Development Committe Report Number: PLN 01-20 Date: January 13, 2020 From: Kyle Bentley Director, City Development & CBO Subject: Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study Planning Options Report (Phase 2 Report) File: D-1100-096 Recommendation: 1. That the Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods, Planning Options Report (Phase 2 Report) prepared by SGL Planning & Design Inc., dated December 2019, be received; and, 2. That Council authorize City Development staff to proceed with Phase 3 of the Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study. Executive Summary: This report provides an update on the status of the Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study, presents the Planning Options Report (Phase 2 Report) of the Study prepared by SGL Planning & Design Inc. dated December 2019 (which is posted on the City of Pickering website at pickering.ca/InfillStudy and circulated under separate cover), and seeks Council authorization to proceed with Phase 3 of the Study. The purpose of the Study is to provide direction for the preparation of appropriate official plan policies, zoning regulations and other implementation tools, and to develop draft design guidelines that will facilitate a sensitive transition between existing houses and new construction in the City's established neighbourhoods in the South Pickering Urban Area. The Planning Options Report completes Phase 2 of the Study and, among other things, identifies gaps and opportunities in existing City policy, guidelines and strategies to address the matter of infill and replacement housing, provides a rationale for a preferred strategy for managing new infill and replacement housing while respecting and/or enhancing a neighbourhood's character, and provides a summary of the feedback received at the Public Open House 2 and through the on-line Infill Survey. Phase 3 of the Study will include further public engagement and result in a Recommendation Report and Draft Design Guidelines to be presented to Planning & Development Committee and Council. - 31 - PLN 01-20 January 13, 2020 Subject: Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study Page 2 Financial Implications: On June 28, 2018, Council approved the project funding of $147,995.00 and the financing as 55 percent from property tax and 45 percent from Development Charges. Funds to complete the Study will be carried over in the 2020 Current Budget for the City Development Department, Consulting and Professional (Account 2611.2392.0000). 1. Background 1.1 Study Purpose and Process The purpose of the Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study is to provide direction for the preparation of appropriate official plan policies, zoning regulations and other implementation tools, and to develop design guidelines that will facilitate a sensitive transition between existing houses and new construction in the City's established neighbourhoods in South Pickering. On April 23, 2019, Council received the Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods, Existing Conditions and Preliminary Observations Report — Phase 1 Report, and authorized City Development staff to proceed with Phase 2 of the Study. The Phase 1 Report: • identified areas within the City's established neighbourhoods that may be susceptible to pressure for the development of infill and replacement housing; • identified the key issues regarding infill and replacement housing that are of concern to stakeholders; and • provided a summary of the feedback received at the Public Open House 1. Following Council authorization, SGL Planning & Design Inc. (the consultants) prepared the Draft Planning Options Report (Draft Phase 2 Report) that identified potential tools and strategies to address the compatibility issues identified in Phase 1. Community input on the Draft Phase 2 Report was received through the October 29, 2019 Public Open House 2 and an online survey (the Infill Survey). The Infill Survey was available on the City's website between October 17 and November 4, 2019 and in hard copy at the October 29, 2019 Public Open House 2. Following the synthesis and analysis of the feedback, the consultants modified the Draft Planning Options Report and added a section on what is their Preferred Strategy for addressing the compatibility issues. The result is the completed Planning Options Report which is the subject of this report. 1.2 Definition of Infill and Replacement Housing For the purpose of this study, the following definitions of infill and replacement housing are used: -32- PLN 01-20 January 13, 2020 Subject: Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study Page 3 Infill means the development of 2 or more ground -oriented housing forms such as single detached, semi-detached and townhouse dwellings through a consolidation of lots or the severance of a larger lot. Within the context of this study, infill does not include the development of stacked townhomes, stacked back-to-back townhomes, apartment buildings, or other forms of multi -unit housing resulting in a higher level of density. Infill can occur through draft plan of subdivision/condominium, site plan and/or land division. Replacement housing involves a smaller dwelling being substantially altered or demolished and replaced with a new larger dwelling through the building permit application process and possibly the minor variance process. 1.3 Summary of Phase 1 Findings Phase 1 of the Study established that 9 of the 15 South Pickering Urban Area neighbourhoods warrant in-depth study since these neighbourhoods contain the majority of the older housing stock that has experienced most infill and replacement housing over the last few years. Referred to as the "Focus Neighbourhoods", these neighbourhoods are: Bay Ridges, Dunbarton, Highbush, Liverpool, Rosebank, Rougemount, Village East, West Shore, and Woodlands (see Map of Focus Neighbourhoods, Attachment #1). In addition, Phase 1 of the Study found that the majority of observed changes occurring within the Focus Neighbourhoods relate to: • height and overall scale of dwelling; • roof pitch; • height of the front entrance; • separation distance between houses; • front yard setback; • amount and character of landscaped open area on private property; • width and configuration of the driveway; and • location of the garage and/or carport. The Phase 1 Report noted that these observed changes can lead to compatibility issues related to overlook conditions, privacy, shadowing and sense of place. Phase 1 of the Study categorized the various key elements of neighbourhood character that can have an impact on compatibility of new development into three themes: Built Form; Streetscape; and Neighbourhood Composition. The Phase 1 Report also provided a summary of best practices from other municipalities that have experienced a similar increase in infill and replacement housing in established neighbourhoods. 2. Planning Options Report The Planning Options Report completes Phase 2 of the Study and addresses the following as they relate to the matter of infill and replacement housing: • identifies gaps and opportunities in existing City policy, guidelines and strategies; -33- PLN 01-20 January 13, 2020 Subject: Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study Page 4 • identifies potential tools and strategies to address the compatibility issues/trends/observations identified in Phase 1; • provides a rationale for a preferred strategy for managing new infill and replacement housing, while respecting and/or enhancing a neighbourhood's character; • presents the feedback received at the October 29, 2019 Public Open House 2; and • presents the feedback received from the online Infill Survey. 2.1 Tools for Addressing Compatibility The Planning Options Report identifies various tools that can be used to address issues arising from the development of infill and replacement housing, each of which can be used individually or collectively. The report explains the tools and how they are, and/or could be, used in Pickering, and include: • official plan policies; • zoning by-law performance standards; • urban design/development guidelines; and • other tools and processes such as: • building permit, minor variance, and Consent application review processes; • site plan control; • architectural control; • municipal guidelines (for example, the City's "Expectations for Construction Site Maintenance" document); and • municipal by-laws (e.g., Noise Control By-law 6834/08, Boulevard Maintenance By-law 6831 /08,Tree Protection By-law 6108/03). 2.2 Analysis and Opportunities The Analysis and Opportunities section of the report identifies opportunities to address the compatibility issues identified in Phase 1 of the Study. These opportunities are itemized in accordance with the key elements within the themes established in Phase 1 (Built Form, Streetscape and Neighbourhood Composition). 2.3 Preliminary Options The analysis of the various opportunities resulted in Preliminary Options that are summarized in section 3 of the Planning Options Report. In addition to the Preliminary Options, the Draft Planning Options Report contained proposed boundaries to "Neighbourhood Precincts". The Neighbourhood Precinct areas are a reflection of where most of the observed changes have occurred, and/or are expected to continue to occur in the future. The Draft Planning Options Report was made available on the City's website and through the Public Open House 2 for feedback from the community. -34- PLN 01-20 January 13, 2020 Subject: Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study Page 5 2.4 Community Engagement 2.4.1 Public Open House 2 On October 17 and 24, 2019, Notices of a Public Open House appeared in the Ajax - Pickering News Advertiser for 2 consecutive weeks prior to the meeting. Interested parties who requested to be kept informed about the Study were sent a Notice of the Public Open House either by email or regular mail. In addition, people listed on the Interested Parties List for the applications at 505 and 591 Liverpool Road (Pickering Harbour Company) and 1280, 1288-1294 Wharf Street and 607 Annland Street (Morgan Application) were also notified of the Public Open House either by email or regular mail. A notice of the Public Open House was also delivered to all properties within the Neighbourhood Precincts identified in Appendix A of the Draft Planning Options Report. On October 29, 2019, Public Open House 2 was held to receive community input into the Draft Planning Options Report regarding: • suggested planning options related to managing infill and replacement housing in their neighbourhood; and • proposed Neighbourhood Precinct boundaries where change should be managed. Approximately 100 people attended Public Open House 2, which consisted of a presentation from the consultant team, followed by a group workshop and the opportunity for participants to provide written feedback on the preliminary options presented. Detailed feedback from Public Open House 2 is contained in Appendix C of the Planning Options Report. 2.4.2 Infill Survey In addition to the public open house, community engagement in Phase 2 included the "Infill Survey", an online questionnaire regarding the potential options for addressing the compatibility issues identified in Phase 1. The Infill Survey was available between October 17, 2019 and November 4, 2019, as well as in hard copy format at the October 29, 2019 Public Open House 2. Approximately 154 surveys were completed and submitted to the City. Detailed feedback from the Infill Survey is contained in Appendix B of the Planning Options Report. 2.4.3 Summary of Community Engagement The following is a summary of the key responses and comments received through the community engagement initiatives: • The majority of respondents were interested in one of the following Focus Neighbourhoods: West Shore, Bay Ridges, Liverpool, Rosebank and Dunbarton. -35- PLN 01-20 January 13, 2020 Subject: Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study Page 6 • The majority of responses indicated that the maximum Dwelling Height should be regulated based on the height of nearby dwellings, and that 9.0 metres is an appropriate maximum dwelling height. Approximately 35 percent of responses indicated that the maximum height should be lower than 9.0 metres. • With respect to the Height of the Front Entrance, over 50 percent of responses indicated that this should be regulated. The results for a suggested maximum Height of the Front Entrance was very close between 6 steps (1.2 metres) and 3 steps (0.6 metres). It is notable that many participants also indicated an interest in having the Height of the Front Entrance similar to that of other dwellings on the same street. • With respect to maximum Lot Coverage, an even split of responses noted a preference for either maintaining the maximum permitted Lot Coverage at 33 percent or lowering it to 25%. There was similar interest between a desire for maximum Lot Coverage to be based on the average within a Focus Neighbourhood and a desire for it to be based on the average on a more localized scale (e.g., based on individual streets within Focus Neighbourhoods). • The majority of responses indicated that the City should regulate maximum Dwelling Depth within Focus Neighbourhoods and that the depth of dwellings should be compatible with that of other dwellings on the same street. • The majority of responses indicated agreement with the options presented with respect to Separation Distance Between Dwellings. Responses favoured regulating the Separation Distance Between Dwellings based on the existing distance between dwellings on the same side of the street. • The majority of responses indicated agreement with the options presented with respect to Front Yard Setback. Responses also indicated a preference for the minimum Front Yard Setback to be based on the average Front Yard Setback of all dwellings along the same side of the street within the same block. • With respect to Garage and Carport Placement, responses indicated a strong preference for implementing urban design guidelines, over all other options, to address this matter. However, there was also support noted for the other options presented, with less support for garage and carports to be set back behind the front main wall of a dwelling, which received limited interest. • The majority of responses indicated a desire for the City to regulate Driveway Width in Focus Neighbourhoods. The majority of responses supported limiting Driveway Width to be no wider than that required to fit 2 cars side-by-side (6.0 metres, 20 feet). A significant number of responses also noted that the width of driveways within the public right-of-way, in instances where the driveway width is greater than 6.0 metres on private property, should be restricted to a maximum of 6.0 metres (20 feet). • Over half of responses noted that the City should not consider regulating Front Yard Landscaping within Focus Neighbourhoods. There was little interest noted in regulating the minimum amount of area that should be soft landscaping features in the front yard. -36- PLN 01-20 January 13, 2020 Subject: Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study Page 7 • Although not identified as part of the Neighbourhood Precincts undergoing change through infill and replacement housing, there are areas within the Liverpool Road Waterfront Node that are the subject of major redevelopment proposals. Approximately 103 responses were received to the online survey opportunity for commenting on the future of the Liverpool Road Waterfront Node. A summary of these comments is found in Appendix B of the Planning Options Report. 2.5 Preferred Strategy The Preferred Strategy outlined in section 5 of the Planning Options Report takes into consideration the feedback received through the community engagement activities described above. The Preferred Strategy is summarized below and includes proposed changes to the City of Pickering Official Plan, the City's Zoning By-laws and the preparation of Urban Design Guidelines, and other tools, and is intended to apply to the Neighbourhood Precincts as identified in Appendix A of the Planning Options Report. Preferred Strategy: • Add new policies in the Pickering Official Plan that require that new infill and replacement housing complement the character of established neighbourhoods specifically as it relates to: Dwelling Height and Roof Pitch, Side Yard Setback and Separation Distance Between Dwellings, Lot Frontage, Front Yard Setback, Garage or Carport Placement, Front Yard Landscaping and Street Trees; • Add new Performance Standards in the Zoning By-law to: • Restrict the maximum Dwelling Height in the Focus Neighbourhoods to 9.0 metres; • Restrict the maximum Height of the Front Entrance to a maximum of 6 steps (1.2 metres); • Restrict the maximum Dwelling Depth based on the depth of the lot (for lots with depths less than 30 metres: maximum dwelling depth of 15 metres; For lots with depths between 30 and 40 metres: maximum dwelling depth of 17 metres; For lots with depths greater than 40 metres: maximum dwelling depth of 20 metres); • Restrict the maximum Front Yard Setback to no greater than that of either adjacent lot, whichever is greater; • Restrict the Width of a Garage or Carport to a maximum of 50 percent of the overall width of a dwelling; • Restrict the maximum Driveway Width to 6.0 metres; • Amend Performance Standards in the Zoning By-law to: • Restrict Lot Coverage to be within the range of 25 percent to 33 percent within Neighbourhood Precincts. Currently the average existing Lot Coverage within the Focus Neighbourhoods is 25 percent, whereas, generally, the maximum permitted Lot Coverage across most Focus Neighbourhoods is 33 percent; • Restrict the minimum Front Yard Setback to be based on the average existing Front Yard Setbacks of all dwellings along the same side of the street within the same block; -37- PLN 01-20 January 13, 2020 Subject: Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study Page 8 • Confirm that the Performance Standard in the Zoning By-law for maximum Dwelling Height of 9.0 metres applies to the areas within the Neighbourhood Precincts and to the lands designated "R3" — Residential Third Density and "R4" — Residential Fourth Density in accordance with By-law 7610/18; • Adopt New Urban Design Guidelines that address the following key elements of neighbourhood character: • Dwelling Height and Roof Pitch; • Height of Front Entrance; • Dwelling Length, Width and Depth; • Side Yard Setback and Separation Distance Between Dwellings; • Garage or Carport Placement; • Driveway Width and Front Yard Landscaping; • Street Trees; and • Consider adoption of a Private Tree By-law that would protect trees on private property. 3.0 Next Steps Phase 3 of the Study will: • analyze the Preferred Strategy in terms of expected results, resources, processes and efficiencies associated with implementation; • recommend strategies, tools, guidelines, including Draft Design Guidelines, timing and required resources to address infill and replacement housing within the City of Pickering for Council consideration; • recommend where these strategies, tools and guidelines should be implemented within the City of Pickering; • engage the public, agencies and stakeholders; and • address feedback from the consultation process undertaken in Phase 3. Phase 3 will result in the preparation of a Recommendation Report and Draft Design Guidelines. City staff will report to Planning & Development Committee and Council on the Recommendation Report and Draft Design Guidelines. Attachment: 1. Map of Focus Neighbourhoods -38- PLN 01-20 Subject: Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods Study January 13, 2020 Page 9 Prepared By: Original Signed By: Margaret Kish, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Policy Original Signed By: Dean Jacobs, MCIP, RPP Manager, Policy & Geomatics MK:Id Approved/Endorsed By: Original Signed By: Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Chief Planner Original Signed By: Kyle Bentley, P. Eng. Director, City Development & CBO Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Original Signed By: Tony Prevedel, P. Eng. Chief Administrative Officer -39- Attachment #1 to Report #PLN 01-20 13 CO 0 m Duffin Third Concession Road Heights / 03 0 Ce as o a CU 0 0 s Liverpool Brock Ridge Finch Avenue Rouge Park 01 Amberlea 1/0, llik IL 1.vE:te Highbush 1ir Sheppard,Avenue— 1 Dunbarton City Centre L. �- -� ------." O� �etr' � — •' Rougemount Woodlands 7 Bay R Brockt West-Shore ‘ f,1p!LL)H Visa 1111 f Industrial Rosebank 11 - /j,......g..--j Lake Ontario N Q Focus NeighbourhoodsAil Map of Focus Neighbourhoods C44 File: D1100-096 PICKERING City Development Department Mar. 11, 2019 Date: C The Corporation of the Cny of Pickennq Produced �n part) under license from: ®Queens Pnnter, Ontano Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;® Her Majesy the Queen in Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; A Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers all rights res�ed.; ® M4p�perty As�ssment Corporation and its suppliers all rights reserved.; SCALE. 1:50,000 OOO THIS IS NOTA PLAN OF SURVEY