Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJune 12, 2019DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Agenda Meeting Number: 6 Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 pickering.ca Cly 4 DICKERING Agenda Committee of Adjustment Wednesday, June 12, 2019 7:00 pm Council Chambers 1. Disclosure of Interest 2. Adoption of Agenda 3. Adoption of Minutes from May 8, 2019 4. Reports 4.1 Page Number 1-10 P/CA 26/19 & 27/19 11-15 W. & P. Sozanski 1893 Appleview Road 4.2 P/CA 28/19 16-20 G. & R. Demian 1528 Major Oaks Road 4.3 P/CA 29/19 21-25 S. Zielinski & C. McPhee 209 Gwendolyn Street 4.4 P/CA 30/19 26-31 M. Thompson & E. Clements 531 Carmello Court 4.5 P/CA 31/19 32-35 Seaton TFPM Inc. 1705 Whitevale Road 4.6 P/CA 32/19 36-40 C. Serroul 1427 Rougemount Drive 4.7 P/CA 33/19 41-46 Steele Valley Developments Ltd. 1300 Kingston Road 4.8 P/CA 34/19 47-52 S. Batonga 1240 Maple Ridge Drive 4.9 P/CA 35/19 53-59 R. & M. Fernandez 5. Adjourr�ri��nt�etunia Place For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Samantha O'Brien T. 905.420.4660, extension 2023 Email sobrien@pickering.ca 64 P1CKE RiNG Pending Adoption Present Tom Copeland - Vice -Chair David Johnson — Chair Eric Newton Denise Rundle Sean Wiley Also Present Deborah Wylie, Secretary -Treasurer Samantha O'Brien, Assistant Secretary -Treasurer Committee of Adjustment 1 Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 8, 2019 7:00 pm Council Chambers (1) Disclosure of Interest No disclosures of interest were noted. (11) Adoption of Agenda Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland That Item #6 be moved forward, and that the revised agenda for the Wednesday, May 8, 2019 meeting be adopted. Carried Unanimously (111) Adoption of Minutes Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland That the minutes of the 4th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, April 10, 2019 be adopted as amended. Carried Unanimously Page 1 of 10 2 Grp DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 8, 2019 7:00 pm Council Chambers (IV) Reports 1. (Deferred from the April 10, 2019 Meeting) P/CA 20/19 K. Arndt & B. Greer 1954 Fairport Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit an accessory building (detached garage) with a maximum height of 6.7 metres, whereas the by-law states no accessory building shall exceed a height of 3.5 metres in any residential zone. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to recognize an existing detached garage. The Chair acknowledged that application P/CA 20/19 by K. Arndt & B. Greer has been Withdrawn and Tom Copeland moved the following motion: Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 20/19 by K. Arndt & B. Greer, be Withdrawn on the grounds that the requested variance has been determined by staff to no longer be required. Carried Unanimously 2. P/CA 21/19 Gironde Community Development Inc. 1711 Pure Springs Boulevard The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 7218/12 to permit: • a minimum front yard setback of 1.8 metres, whereas the by-law requires 2.0 metres • a minimum side yard width of 2.85 metres, whereas the by-law requires 3.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain building permits to facilitate the construction of a common element condominium development. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Page 2 of 10 CGS o1 DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 8, 2019 7:00 pm Council Chambers Joseph Pavia, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In response to questions from Committee Members, Joseph Pavia stated the requested minor variance application was brought forward when the As -Built drawings submitted for the building permit process revealed a minor discrepancy from the approved site plan. Given that the application appears to be minor as indicated in the report and as described by the agent in answers to questions from Committee Members, Sean Wiley moved the following motion: Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 21/19 by Gironde Community Development Inc., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the common element condominium, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2 contained in the Committee of Adjustment Reported dated May 8, 2019). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by May 8, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Vote Tom Copeland opposed David Johnson in favour Eric Newton in favour Denise Rundle in favour Sean Wiley in favour Page 3 of 10 3 4 DICKERING C44 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 8, 2019 7:00 pm Council Chambers 3. P/CA 22/19 S. Patel 3395 Uxbridge -Pickering Townline Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06 to permit: • an accessory building (storage building) to be erected in the front yard, whereas the by-law requires all accessory buildings which are not part of the main building to be erected in the rear yard • an accessory building (storage building) to be erected in the east side yard, whereas the by-law requires all accessory buildings which are not part of the main building to be erected in the rear yard The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to facilitate the construction of an accessory building (storage building). The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Shetukumar Patel, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In response to questions from a Committee Member, Shetukumar Patel stated the purpose of the storage building is not to run a business, rather to store vehicles and various seasonal yard working equipment, such as lawn mowers, tractors and attachments. Given that the application meets the four tests of the Planning Act, Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 22/19 by S. Patel, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: Page 4 of 10 CJS DICKERING 5 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 8, 2019 7:00 pm Council Chambers 1. That these variances apply only to the accessory building (storage building), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2 contained in the Committee of Adjustment Reported dated May 8, 2019). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by May 7, 2021, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously P/CA 23/19 C. & J. Alexander 676 Balaton Avenue The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended by By-law to permit: • a minimum rear yard setback of 4.0 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 7.5 metres (Section 8.2.3) • a maximum lot coverage of 34 percent, whereas the by-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent (Section 8.2.5) • uncovered steps and a covered porch not exceeding 1.1 metres in height above grade and not projecting more than 3.0 metres into the required front yard, whereas the by-law requires uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1 metre in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.5 metres into any required front yard nor 1 metre into any side yard (Section 5.8.b) • an uncovered deck not exceeding 2.5 metres in height above grade and not projecting more than 4.5 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the by-law requires uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1 metre in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.5 metres into any required front yard nor 1 metre into any side yard (Section 5.8.b) uncovered steps and platform not exceeding 2.5 metres in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.0 metre into the east side yard, whereas the by-law requires uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1 metre in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.5 metres into any required front yard nor 1 metre into any side yard (Section 5.8.b) Page 5 of 10 6 c44 DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 8, 2019 7:00 pm Council Chambers • uncovered steps and platform not exceeding 2.5 metres in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.0 metre into the west side yard, whereas the by-law requires uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1 metre in height above grade and not projectingmore than 1.5 metres into any required front yard nor 1 metre into any side yard (Section 5.8.b) The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for a residential addition, including a sunroom, covered porch and uncovered deck. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority expressing no concerns with the application. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department stating the subject property is within the City's Tree Protection Area, and therefore a permit is required to remove any trees. Written comments were also received from residents of 678 Balaton Avenue who asked the applicants to consider a reconfiguration of the submitted site plan to allow the current site line views of the park be maintained. James & Catherine Alexander, applicants, were present to represent the application. John & Noreen Wills of 678 Balaton Avenue were present in opposition to the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. James Alexander spoke in support of the application stating the property is to be maintained as a bungalow style dwelling with a 10 foot cement pad extension at the rear of the property. He went on to state that he has been working with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authorities to obtain a permit, as well as the City of Pickering to obtain a tree removal permit, that may not be required. James Alexander also noted the existing shed will be relocated to the south west region of the property near the trees to comply with all by-law requirements and existing easement. John Wills stated his property is located west of the subject lands, and indicated he is opposed to the application. He is concerned that the proposed sunroom includes a roof and walls, and will obstruct his view of the pond. In response to questions from the Committee, James Alexander stated the sunroom is 16.8 feet wide and 13.6 feet deep into the rear yard. When asked about the ability to relocate the sunroom to the east side, James Alexander stated the proposed location of the sunroom is optimal for the entire floorplan and the design of the existing dwelling. He also indicated there are no future plans for additional construction or to have the deck enclosed. Page 6 of 10 Cts o� DICKERING 7 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 8, 2019 7:00 pm Council Chambers Given that the Committee heard from the neighbour about concerns related to their currently open view of the vacant lands and beyond, the proposed sunroom addition would still be in view if built in conformity with the rear yard setback requirement and the requested variance is reasonable given the vacant lands at the rear. There were also no objections to the proposed 1% increase in coverage of the front, rear and sidestep encroachments required due to the shape of the lot. It is for these reasons and consideration that the application meets the four tests in the Planning Act that Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Tom Copeland That application ,_P/CA 23/19 by C. & J. Alexander, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the residential addition, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3 & 4 contained in the Committee of Adjustment Reported dated May 8, 2019). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by May 7, 2021, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously 5. P/CA 24/19 G. EI-Saikali 1977 Valley Farm Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2051/85 to permit zero private garages to be attached to the main building, whereas the by-law requires a minimum of one private garage per lot to be attached to the main building. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to facilitate the conversion of an attached garage into living space. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Page 7 of 10 8 DICKERING cdy Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 8, 2019 7:00 pm Council Chambers Gergi. EI-Saikali, applicant, was present to represent the application. Arlene McCluskey of 1981 Valley Farm Road was also present in support of the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In response to questions from Committee Members, Gergi EI-Saikali stated there is only one family residing at this residence.. He also indicated the existing garage is approximately 15 feet by 22 feet. When questioned if the applicant has the right to access over the easement located on the south of the property, the Secretary -Treasurer indicated that there was no information on file pertaining to the easement. Given that the application meets the four tests of the Planning Act, Tom Copeland moved the following motion: Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 24/19 by G. EI-Saikali, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2 contained in the Committee of Adjustment Reported dated May 8, 2019). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by May 8, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously 6. P/CA 25/19 W. & S. Douglas 3230 Mulberry Lane The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, to permit: a detached garage in the side and front yard, whereas the by-law requires all accessory buildings which are not part of the main building shall be erected in the rear yard (Section 5.18(a)) Page 8 of 10 CGg a� DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 8, 2019 7:00 pm Council Chambers • a detached garage with a height of 4 metres in a residential zone, whereas the by-law requires no accessory building shall exceed a height of 3.5 metres in any residential zone (Section 5.18(c)) The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to construct a detached garage. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Jasper Horn, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In response to questions from Committee Members, Jasper Horn stated the existing garage is 16 feet wide by 24 feet deep, and is designed to house one service vehicle. He indicated the only service utility connection in the garage is electricity for the automatic door. Jasper Horn also stated it is approximately 30 metres from Mulberry Lane. Given the agent's response to the questions posed and the minor variances meeting the four tests of the Planning Act, Tom Copeland moved the followed motion: Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Sean Wiley That application P/CA 25/19 by W. & S. Douglas, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the detached garage, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2 & 3 contained in the Committee of Adjustment Reported dated May 8, 2019). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by May 7, 2021, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously Page 9 of 10 9 10 C4 o� DICKERING Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, May 8, 2019 7:00 pm Council Chambers (V) Adjournment Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Denise Rundle That the 5th meeting of the 2019 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 7:44 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2019. Date Chair Assistant Secretary -Treasurer Carried Unanimously Page 10 of 10 zy DICKERING 11 Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Numbers: P/CA 26/19 & P/CA 27/19 Date: June 12, 2019 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Applications P/CA 26/19 & P/CA 27/19 W. & P. Sozanski 1893 Appleview Road Applications P/CA 26/19 (Proposed Retained Parcel) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum lot frontage of 15.7 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres. P/CA 27/19 (Proposed Severed Parcel) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum lot frontage of 15.7 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of these minor variance applications in order to facilitate the creation of one additional lot through the Region of Durham Land Division Committee (File Number LD 056/19). New Detached dwellings are proposed for both severed and retained parcels. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following condition: 1. That the applicant obtain a final clearance for Land Division Application LD 056/19 by July 1, 2020, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan The property is designated "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the Dunbarton Neighbourhood. The Official Plan contains policies encouraging infill development of vacant or underutilized blocks of land, while ensuring that new development protects and enhances the character of established neigbourhoods. 1 2 Report P/CA 26/19 & P/CA 27/19 June 12, 2019 Page 2 The proposed lot frontages of 15.7 metres are to facilitate the creation of one additional infill lot fronting onto Appleview Road. The frontages of existing lots fronting onto Appleview Road to the south of the subject property range from approximately 15.0metres to over 30.0 metres. In 2016, lands south of the subject property, now known as 1885 and 1887 Appleview Road, were severed with variances to permit lot frontages of 15.2 metres. The proposed lot frontages of 15.7 metres represents infill development that is consistent with the lotting pattern and character of the immediate established neighbourhood along Appleview Road. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The majority of the subject property from Appleview Road to a depth of 60 metres is zoned "R3" by Zoning By-law. 3036, as amended, while the eastern portion is zoned "S2" under Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2423/83. The "R3" Zone requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres. The intent of the minimum lot frontage requirement is to ensure a usable lot size that is compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood. As a condition of the Land Division Application, the City's Engineering Services Department requires the conveyance of land for the construction of a, permanent cul-de-sac at the end of Appleview Road. After severance and the conveyance of land for the cul-de-sac the proposed lots will still have areas of approximately 1,053 square metres. The proposed lot sizes and frontages will provide ample area for the development of two detached dwellings in keeping with the other generously sized detached dwellings along Appleview Road. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land With lot areas of approximately 1,053 square metres, the proposed lots will allow for the construction of generously sized dwellings while still meeting the other provisions of the "R3" Zone. Currently, Appleview Road reaches a dead-end in front of the subject property. As a condition of approval of the Land Division Application, the City's Engineering Services Department requires the conveyance of land and construction of a permanent cul-de-sac for the completion of Appleview Road. The development of the subject property represents an opportunity for the Engineering Services Department to complete Appleview Road to municipal standards. Minor in Nature. The proposed reduced lot frontage of 15.7 metres is consistent with other lots zoned "R3" in the surrounding neighbourhood. The proposed lot frontages are not anticipated to have any significant impact on the surrounding neighbourhood. Staff are of the opinion that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintain the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. 13 Report P/CA 26/19 & P/CA 27/19 June 12, 2019 Page 3 Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Two Area Residents Date of report: June 5, 2019 Comments prepared by: Rory McNeil Planner I RM:nwb • no comments on the application • oppose the variance and severance of the property, as it will necessitate the creation of a cul-de-sac at the end of Appleview Road • concerned that the construction of the cul-de-sac will result in the loss of mature cedars and green space at the end of Appleview Road that is used as a small parkette • concerned that cars will park in the cul-de-sac and create a hazard to children who pass through the pathway at the, end of Appleview Road on their way to school • comments that the existing configuration of the end of Appleview Road provides safe access for residents and provides an unofficial parkette used by the neighbourhood • concerned that the cul-de-sac will create a negative impact on the residence as it will be built outside their bedroom window • concerned that the construction of the cul-de-sac will result in non -conforming zoning issues for the resident's property • concerned that the cul-de-sac will not be sufficiently large enough for snow storage, snow plows or vehicle traffic • concerned about drainage as the subject property is at the crest of a hill with no storm services or ditches • comments that the dead end street has never been a problem for the neighbourhood as it has serviced only the applicant's one lot J/Y/ Deborah -Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review J:tDocumentsDevelopmentlD-3700120191PCA 26-19 8 PCA 27-19 W. & P. Sozansk6Report1PCA 26-19 8 PCA 27-19 Report.doc Attachments 14 Exhibit 1 Voyager Avenue Strouds Lane 0 00 a Wingarden Crescent a) , a) m w 0 U 0 d Forestbrook Park William Dunbar Public School U`- 0 0 Subject Lands Bonita Avenue MEM MIM ir, o, Lummi of PICKERING City Development Department 1 Location Map a (13 0 a a) 0 0 crescent 0 aCrescent — m N File: P/CA 26/19 & P/CA 27/19 Applicant: W. & P. Sozanski Property Description: Pt Lot 2, Plan 1051 RCP and Pt 2 & 3, 40R-20339 4en.1893 Appleview Road) Th e Corporation of the City of Pickenng Produced yn part) untied efrom ®Queens inter,Ontano MNstry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;@ Her Majesty the Queen N Right of Canada, Department or Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; OTeranet Enterprises Inc and Is suppliers a rights reserved.; ®Munitpal Property Assessment Corporation and ds suppliers ail rights reserved., Date: May. 28, 2019 SCALE: 1:5,000 THIS IS NOTA PLAN OF SURVEY. L:1P lann inglCo re l\P Ian ninglA ppsl PCA12019 To permit a minimum lot frontage of 15.7 metres Proposed Area for Turning Circle l7I WAD'£ 7?Li4 ` 1942 } 7.15 27.57 Q 0 .� R 11.00 R . AREAW $Q PART 3. Proposed Severed Parcel , y o z Q ROM M10WA14CE AREA . 125.6 SQ M - _ $ (3 - LI LI 62 H723570'E L. 7514 ---- . Lu Q ROAD 1ALLOW ALLOWANCE'AREA 27.75 $ LOT AREA . 1053.0 5 Q V u 1-1,1aF Q R MUM AREA =' Proposed Retained Parcel o 19C82 77-7 j U i L 2753 n„ .G 4(I r.75.10 • LOT 2 Site Plan oil File No: PICA 26/19 & P/CA 27/19 o' PICKERING Applicant: W. & P. Sozanski Property Description: Pt Lot 2, Plan 1051 RCP and Pt 2 & 3, 40R-20339 City Development (1893 Appleview Road) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, i I DATE: May 23, 2019 L:1P lann inglCo re l\P Ian ninglA ppsl PCA12019 16 c44 DICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 28/19 Date: June 12, 2019 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 28/19 G. & R. Demian 1528 Major Oaks Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2015/85 to permit an uncovered deck not exceeding 2.9 metres in height above grade and not projecting more than 3.2 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the by-law requires uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metres in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.5 metres into any required front or rear yard and not more than 0.5 of a metre in any required side yard. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for an uncovered deck. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the uncovered deck, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by June 11, 2021, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan — "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the Brock Ridge Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2015/85 — "S -SD" Report P/CA 28/19 June 12, 2019 17 Page 2 Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan The subject property is designated as Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas within the City of Pickering's Official Plan. Detached dwellings are a permitted use within the designation and are the primary built form in Brock Ridge Neighbourhood. Staff is of the opinion that the variance meets the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The applicant is proposing to construct an uncovered deck that connects to the second floor rear entrance on the detached dwelling. There is currently an entrance constructed at the first and second storeys of the detached dwelling, into the rear yard. To date, no deck has been constructed in the rear yard. The intent of the provision 5.7 (b), restricting the height of uncovered steps and platforms to 1.0 metre, is to protect the privacy of abutting properties. The neighbouring property to the. north has an existing deck greater than 1.0 metre in height. Other properties to the north and south also have existing decks greater than 1.0 metre in height that appear to encroach into the rear yard setback. In addition, the intent of the provision 5.7 (b), restricting the projection into the required rear yard setback by decks, is to ensure that adequate amenity space is maintained. The requested projection into the required rear yard setback of 3.2 metres will not deplete the amenity space for the subject property, as there is sufficient amenity area east of the proposed deck. Staff is of the opinion that the variance meets the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land The proposed deck has a height greater than 1.0 metre and projects more than 1.5 metres into the required rear yard. Neighbouring properties also appear to have constructed decks greater than 1.0 metre in height since there is a backyard entrance constructed at the second storey of their detached dwellings. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances to permit the construction of an uncovered deck is desirable for the appropriate development of the land. Minor in Nature The request to construct an uncovered deck that extends into the required rear yard setback and is greater than 1.0 metre in height, is not anticipated to have any significant impact on the surrounding area and therefore, is considered minor in nature. 18Report P/CA 28/19 June 12, 2019 Page 3 Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to permit the construction of a deck is desirable for the appropriate development of land, maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and is minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • no comments on the application Date of report: May 31, 2019 Comments prepared by: Tanjot Bal Planner I TB:DW:nwb Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2019\PCA 28-19 G. & R. Demlan Report PCA 28.19 RepoA.doc Attachments Exhibit 1 Third Concession Road Hydro Lands Hydro Lands Subject Lands Valley Farm Ravine Pepperwood Gate Valley Farm Public School 11111111111111.11 Major Oaks Park C4 Location Map File: P/CA 28/19 P1CKE R1 NG , City Development Department Applicant: G. & R Demian Property Description: Pt'Lot 3, Plan 40M-1509, now Pt 1, 40R-11627 (1528 Major Oaks Road) Date: Apr. 30, 2019 , nThe Corporaden of the City ol Pickering Produced On part) under license front a) Queens Pnnter, Ontario FA In buy of hatural Resources. All rights resened.p Her I.lajnrty the Queen In Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. AI rights re served.; HTeranet Enterprises Inc. and Its supplier: all rights reserved.;e Murdelpal Property Assessment Corporalbn and As suppriers all rights reserved; SCALE: 1:5,000 THIS IS NOT AVLAI. OF SURVEY. 9 20 Exhibit 2 e*45DU To permit an uncovered deck not exceeding 2.9 metres in height above grade and not projecting more than 3.2 metres into the required rear yard. . LOT A A .167 . .1'86 s.�o A Q16' :. tc10 6 8s 17 (4371) LQTR_a 44 s5.s° p 1.71. ' C=.;70 , * nl� g be LOT 43 i 5 2 6 YY N' f .PAR; b p- .r - t ,i ,2'o to;7a .- I ..a `4 iJ rte, ... 1. T A 7 ��51 - id 21.40 P r�T - i ' +• 4011 S 113 a s) ' z A. R P ra 112 ml I 0/� 9 .... 0114 0.5m N I 6C C 5 - y.fiE.R-� DAL. D.U. G. = p_ tJ►R¢, o � 1 1rea1, . 2I4° 3pt�.�.t0.Tc7 t�e�st.. -. IQQ �^ to a . Ot> � W - 11 . N' °37° 1 sts 8u4t IF -t, eNA... . A ..IV '� R:yY.;. n / Submitted Plan °" File No: P/CA 28/19 PICKERING Applicant; G. & R Demian City Development Property Description: Pt Lot 3, Plan 40M-1509, now Pt 1, 40R-11627 Department (1528 Major Oaks Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Ma 17 2019 y Gla DICKERING 21 Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 29/19 Date: June 12, 2019 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 29/19 S. Zielinski & C. McPhee 209 Gwendolyn Street Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1700/83 to permit an accessory structure (pool cabana) 2.8 metres in height to be set back 0.6 metres from the westerly side lot line and 0.6 metres from the rear lot line, whereas the by-law requires 1.0 metre from all lot lines. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct an accessory structure (pool cabana). Recommendation The City Development Department considers the variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and inkeeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the accessory structure (pool cabana), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by June 11, 2021, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan — "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the Rougemount Neighbourhood. Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1700/83 — "S3" 2 2 Report P/CA 29/19 June 12, 2019 Page 2 Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan The property is designated "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas", within the Rougemount Neighbourhood. Lands designated "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" are intended to accommodate uses including residential uses. The proposed variances are to facilitate a structure accessory to the existing main residential use..The variances will not change or impact the use of the property as a low density residential single detached dwelling. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The intent of the zoning by-law in requiring accessory structures to provide a minimum 1.0 metre setback from the all lot lines is to ensure that adequate space is available for maintenance, to ensure that the eaves/overhangs do not encroach on the adjacent properties, to ensure roof drainage stays on the subject property, and to minimize the visual impact that the location may have on adjacent properties. An appropriate amount of space is presented on the property for the proposed accessory building in both the west side yard and the rear yard while ensuring an adequate buffer to the neighbouring properties can be maintained. The entirety of the structure, including eaves/overhang will be contained within the 209 Gwendolyn Street property. It is anticipated that roof drainage will be controlled solely on the subject property as well. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land An accessory structure intended to be used as a pool cabana will enhance the backyard amenity area for the detached dwelling. It would complement the proposed swimming pool, while maintaining adequate separation from the property lines as well as from the pool. Minor in Nature The proposed variances are seeking a 0.4 metre relief from the required setback which is considered to be minimal relative to the size of the lot. The variances are not anticipated to have any significant impact on the surrounding areas and therefore, are considered minor in nature. Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, is minor in nature, and maintain the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • no comments on the application Report P/CA 29/19 June 12, 2019 Page 3 Residents of 207 Gwendolyn Street, 211 Gwendolyn Street, and 1033 Rouge Valley Drive Date of report: June 3, 2019 Comments prepared by: Felix Chau Planner I FC:nwb ® in support of the application ottk Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review J:UDocuments\Development\D-370012019 \PCA 29.19 S. Zielinski & C. McPheeV2eport'PCA 29-10 Repert.dac Attachments 23 Exhibit 1 Howel Crescent Rouge Valley Park leford Street ON E= MUM MIMI MIMI 1♦1•11 MIMI MI♦ IIIMMI E `''I"„" _ m ,pIuI a Oil Q) 0, -- am L u_ Richardson Street me VII ..1 IIIIII - IMI= ErdiuiStover Crescent ", m",I""„"' Subject Lands Valley Gate ""' Rougemount Drive Elizabeth B. Phin Public School Fiddlers Court c44 4 Location Map File: P/CA 29/19 PICKERING City Development Department Applicant: S. Zielinski & C. McPhee Property Description: Lot 6, Plan 40M-1342 (209 Gwendolyn Street) Date: May. 10, 2019 dine he Corporation tne City of Joke ng oduced(m pan) under (cense from: dOueens Pnnter, Ontam Nish of Natural Resources. All rights reserved .0 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; 'DTeranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers a8 rights reserved ;0 Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and l° suppliers allr(ghts reserved.; SCALE. 1.5r00O THIS IS NOTA RAH OF SURVEY. 25 Exhibit 2 . . • ii iff4e'' ' . • (PS .. , ' , ,, • . P ,-.• , - P ,• , t . . • . ' . • t •: A I > , _._ ---- - •-::::•77-• 7 - -- ••• - -, A .; i .i. P'_ ....-,.. ....1.4t- -,. . .,,f •P.,• 9 -': . :- .4.- 1- _•__Z.: - .1 7;-: ....: _...'.., ._, . - ' t ... _ '-• ' - L ', '. - _ 't " '1 • „..- Y _-,,_"--- '- •*1-, '' 1.j , ...,.. 1 "d3:0•1*0:. - - ,: .. .•- - • • -,..1 • - : .,.-- ., t I. 'i,_ - - t • , ' -:-•--.., - - --, • ' Lt_ _____-_-, „ . - . - . _ .• , ...;,.. _ '1' ' r -?' i '' " - ‘--*- `‘.. -•••,.f ..- -; --' -:1'—'!--` -1-...--_-::, _ ; , k . • - RICK ,--',-,---,• - , ., . • • - - --- _ : • ,..,.. , •••: '--_-, ., •-_,1 1..., . l :171 10: ; -,. , 1 • . . 1.,, --- , • fi ._ To permit an an accessory 0 ' ,.. . .. - -. , 1 ir 44 structure (pool cabana) 2.8 metres in height to be set back 0.6 metres from the e, .- '. L.„-: _ r i 1 RESIDENCE _ . •-•., 7 -,//' .2 westerly side lot line . . gr ....1.- --- --: _f_ . ,. . •,.! ..: To permit an an accessory structure (pool cabana) 2.8 metres in height to be set,,.. back 0.6 metres from the rear lot line 1=-_-__.-,:. .: .....:•,•1: ., _ - . ---4 :.: • --il"--% _ - : • -, -is; :_ _.. . ___ . -; -,,,-,,: ';':-L-il_ -.;:::, .-.' ...-..-.; 4. -- --;:_4 - :-- • -"?0;.4 lit•Ziasty•-•- • , ;,‘„,12-Ipposed ,-'-',4‘ i , 1 --*---.Ptiel Cabana 2 NIL i„.:, - ._„' CAW,- . -•• -,1-4,...; .„44:.- • 1-•,. •----- ' 6.1.- - - - • '-'' ',,- :'-', - -see attached . e '4 ',2.1';17-5:7'' dravirai,it';.fL ' 1 -..:•-_-_--' ' ' , - L'It--•*-'-•s--• '6 _ gl'-0.'-aS:41.4 '''''' - r '''----.: - eA, '....,•,:.-: PI4P41Z(4;4.' - '1 ' - • -n7,-- , ,:t• -, -- ..., .'-•:"..':,..- 7 .7- ':.F.' ' 4 .. - 0 0•Pets 0 44;* 74'''' — - ..._„_______ _ ' --• -1, ' ' Submitted Plan qy 4. File No: P/CA 29/19 - PICKERING Applicant: S. Zielinski & C. McPhee City Development Property Description: Lot 6, Plan 40M-1342 Department (209 Gwendolyn Street) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 17, 201 9 26 Gtry oA DICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 30/19 Date: June 12, 2019 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 30/19 M. Thompson & E. Clements 531 Carmello Court Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 4354/73 to permit: • a covered deck not exceeding 3.5 metres in height above grade and not projecting more than 2.7 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the by-law requires uncovered steps and platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.5 metres into any required front yard, not 1.0 metre into any required side yard; and • a maximum lot coverage of 34 percent, whereas the by-law requires a maximum building coverage of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for a covered deck. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the covered deck, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2 & 3). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by June 11, 2021, or this decision shall become null and void. 27 Report P/CA 30/19 June 12, 2019 Page 2 Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan — "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the West Shore Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 4354/73 — "SD" Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan The subject property is designated Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas within the City of Pickering's Official Plan. Detached dwellings are a permitted use within the designation and a built form within the West Shore Neighbourhood. Staff is of the opinion that the variances meet the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The applicant is proposing to cover an existing deck in the rear yard of the subject property. The covered deck will not exceed 3.5 metres in height above grade and will not project more than 2.7 metres into the required rear yard. The intent of the provision 5.8(b) in Zoning By-law 2511 is to restrict the height of uncovered steps and platforms so that the privacy of neighbouring properties are protected and to maintain an adequate amenity space in the rear yard. The proposed roof structure will be installed on an angle and the existing platform will not be raised. Therefore, the privacy of the neighbouring properties will remain protected and there will be no decrease in amenity space in the rear yard. As a result of the covered deck, the subject lands require a variance to the maximum lot coverage permitted on a property. The maximum lot coverage provision is in place to ensure drainage is not negatively impacted by an increase in hard surfaces. The platform on the property exists today and there will be no Toss of landscaped areas as a result of the proposed covered deck. Staff is of the opinion that the variances meet the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law.. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land The proposed covered deck has a roof height greater than 1.0 metre and projects more than 1.5 metres into the required rear yard. Neighbouring properties appear to have decks within their rear yards. In addition, the platform has existed at the subject property historically and no concerns have been raised by neighbouring properties. 28 Report P/CA 30/19 June 12, 2019 Page 3 Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances to permit the construction of a covered deck is desirable for the appropriate development of the land. Minor in Nature The request to construct a covered deck that extends into the required rear yard setback, which is greater than 1.0 metre in height and results in a maximum lot coverage of 34 percent, is not anticipated to have any significant impact on the surrounding area and therefore, is considered minor in nature. Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances to permit the construction of a covered deck is desirable for the appropriate development of land, maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and is minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: May 31, 2019 Comments prepared by: Tanjot Bal Planner TB:nwb • no comments on the application Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review J:11JocumenlstDevelopmentl0-3700120191PCA 30-19 M. Thompson & E. Clements Report\PCA 30-19 Report.doc Attachments zscen a�%I1�I' Layton Coutt 1 11111110 -o 0 CC to him MIIIIIIIIIIII Abingdon Court Wil I I!1 J isr= 111 1 1n :Nom"rgl mo, 111111111111' ' wILookout Do n/an, Exhibit CC• Stonebridge Lane Point Park 0 EnEn Court Cliffview WoodloJ W` • Callahan Street Subject Lands Dunmoore Park t :iiiiiiiiiiliiiiii • vow/44 46. Go. rat Cliffview Park Petticoat Conservation Area Lake Ontario Location Map File: P/CA 30/19 --C44 PICKERING City Development Department Applicant: M. Thompson & E. Clements Property Description: Part Lot 90, Plan M1017, now Part 8, 40R-2237 531 Carmello CourtDate: Ma . 10, 2019 orpore •onu re dig o kkemg'm•uco. (nparuu .er Icense nom • •ueens'nMer, • ano,nrstry o latm e our CQ$ 411 rights reserved ,0 Her Majesty the Mee n in Right of Canada, Depmlmenl or Natural Resources. AA dr reserved.; DTeranel Enterprises Inc. and Is supprers alt rights reamed .,SiMuNNpai Properly Assessment Corporation and As suppters all rights reserved.; SCALE 1:5,000 TR IS Is NOT APIANOE SURVEY. Exhibit 2 w AT 7 l� Ci se-ot' To permit a covered deck not exceeding 3.5 metres in height above grade and not projecting more than 2.7 metres into the required rear yard. To permit a maximum lot coverage of 34% cdrd PICKERING City Development Department Site Plan File No: PCA 30/19 Applicant: M. Thompson & E. Clements Property Description: Part Lot 90, Plan M1017, now Part 8, 40R-2237 (531 Carmello Court) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. 1 DATE: May 23, 2019 LAPlanning1CorelNPlanninglAppslP CA12019 Exhibit 3 1 16.--- - it...,_ • _ t . ' IIlir ..,... ! - --4-bilass,4.0 __ -� 1.r., _ f 116. #te riiiitlij:}. 1,-,....t... # it 1 � 1111 if f r Z ozy Proposed Deck File No: PCA 30/19 d PICKERI NG City Development Department Applicant: M. Thompson & E. Clements Property Description: Part Lot 90, Plan M1017, now Part 8, 40R-2237 (531 Carmello Court) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OFPICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT- DATE: May 23, 2019 L:\Plan ing1Co rel\Pla nni ng\P.pps\PCA\2019 32 c4 o� DICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 31/19 Date: June 12, 2019 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 31/19 Seaton TFPM Inc. 1705 Whitevale Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6577/05 to permit a temporary sales facility, whereas the by-law does not permit a temporary sales facility within an agricultural zone. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to permit a temporary sales facility on the subject Lands for a maximum of 10 years. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the temporary sales facility to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the temporary sales facility, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain Site Plan Approval for the proposed temporary sales facility by June 11, 2021, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the temporary sales facility be setback a minimum of 15.0 metres from Brock Road and a minimum of 15.0 metres from Whitevale Road. 4. That the decision of the Committee shall be null and void after June 12, 2029. Background Given the relatively long-term nature of the sales program anticipated for Seaton, Seaton RFPM Inc. requires a sales centre associated with their model homes for up to a maximum of 10 years. The applicant will be submitting a site plan application to establish the location, built form, access, landscaping and other performance standards for the temporary facility. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan — "Mixed Use Areas — Mixed Corridors" within the Thompson's Corner Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3037, as amended — "A" Rural Agricultural Report P/CA 31/19 June 12, 2019 33 Page 2 Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan The property is designated "Mixed Use Areas — Mixed Corridors" within the Thompson's Corners Neighbourhood. Official Plan policies encourage a wide variety of uses and high level of activities including the retailing of goods and services, offices, and residential. The property is within the Seaton development boundaries. Furthermore, the subject property is shown as a "Gateway Site" within the Thompson's Corners Neighbourhood. The proposed temporary sales facility is intended to market future developments in this Neighbourhood. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The permitted uses in the "A" — Rural Agricultural zone include residential, agricultural, recreational, and agricultural related businesses. The current zoning has no specific provisions related to sales facility uses. The "A" — Rural Agricultural zoning of this property does not conform to its Official Plan land use designation, however, it is staff's understanding that the zoning will be brought into conformity through a future Zoning By-law Amendment by the owner to facilitate appropriate development on these lands. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land Given the nature of the owner's building program, the proposed temporary sales facility use is appropriate in the short-term (10 years). It will not preclude any appropriate development from occurring since the owner intends on submitting subsequent development applications on the subject lands. The temporary sales facility is intended to market future appropriate development of the land. Minor in Nature Since the property is located within the Seaton boundary, large scale development is anticipated to come in the area. Additionally, the property and the conceptual location of the temporary sales facility is adequately buffered from the existing surrounding land uses. Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to permit a temporary sales facility is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • no comments on the application Date of report: June 6, 2019 Comments prepared by: Felix Chau Planner I FC:nwb Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review J:1Documents\Developmenl\D•370012019 PCA 31 -19 -Seaton TFPM Inc\ReporPPCA 31-19 Repod.doc Attachments Exhibit 1 91 Cn Whitevale Road Subject Lands Fifth Concession Road 04 4 Location Map File: P/CA 31/19 PICKERING City Development Department Applicant: SeatonTFPM Inc. Property Description:Lot 19, Concession 4, now Part of Part 1, 40R-29371 (1705 Whitevale Road) Date: May. 14, 2019 bThe Corporation of the City of Pic song Produced (m pan) under license from:®Oueens Pdnler, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.,® Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. Al rights reserved.; OTeranet Enterprises hrc. and its suppliers all rights reserved.;® Mwddeal Properly Assessment Corporation and ds supp5ers all rights reserved; SCALE, 1.5,000 THIS Is NOTA PLAN OF SURVEY. Exhibit 2 \4 I To permit a temporary sales facility l APPRO?C OVERFLOW AREATO BE PARKING CONFIRMED .-1 •• •- • f r.- . j � •�- °•� .1 THIS ENTRANCE TO BE CONFIRMED 1 THIS ENTRANCE TO BE CONFIRMED .! l m bh6 rAb 6b Q ., I 11111j1111111WiluililllTy( BROCK ROAD THIS ENTRANCE BE CONFIRMED 41PN\ TO Site Plan File No: PCA 31/19 ti PICKERING Applicant: SeatonTFPM Inc. Property Description: Lot 19, Concession 4, now Part of Part 1, 40R-29371 City Development (1705 Whitevale Road) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 24, 2019 L:\Planning\Corel\PIa n ning\Apps\PCA\2019 36 cte .� DICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 32/19 Date: June 12, 2019 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 32/19 C. Serroul 1427 Rougemount Drive Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2912/88 to permit a minimum side yard of 1.5 metres, whereas the by-law requires one side yard a minimum of 1.5 metres and the other side yard a minimum of 2.4 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for a two-storey detached dwelling. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance., subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed construction, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by June 11, 2021, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan — "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the Rougemount Neighbourhood. Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2912/88 — "G" — Greenbelt & "R3" — Third Density Residential Zone Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan The subject property is designated as "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density" Areas within the City of Pickering's Official Plan. Detached dwellings are a permitted use within the designation and the primary housing form within the Rougemount Neighbourhood. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to permit a minimum side yard of 1.5 metres meets the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan. Report P/CA 32/19 June 12, 2019 37 Page 2 Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The intent of the minimum side yard requirement of the zoning by-law is to provide an appropriate separation between structures on abutting properties and to accommodate pedestrian access to the rear yard. The requested side yard setback of 1.5 metres is sufficient to provide adequate separation between dwellings and to provide pedestrian access into the rear yard. The requested variance meets the general intent and purpose of Zoning By-law 3036. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land On the subject property, there is a detached dwelling and accessory structures. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing structures to construct a detached dwelling. The neighbouring detached dwellings are larger than the existing detatched dwelling at 1427 Roungemount Drive. Some of these properties have been granted relief from the side yard setback, to permit a side yard setbacks of 1.5 metres or less. Therefore, staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to permit a minimum side yard of 1.5 metres is desirable for the appropriate development of the land. Minor in Nature The request to rebuild a detached dwelling that extends into the required side yard setback is not anticipated to have any significant impact on the surrounding area, and therefore is considered minor in nature. Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to permit a minimum side yard of 1.5 metres is desirable for the appropriate development of land, maintains the intent and purpose of the Official' Plan and Zoning By-law, and is minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • no comments on the application Toronto and Region Conservation Authority • no concerns with the application Date of report: June 5, 2019 Comments prepared by: Tanjot Bal Planner I TB: DW: nwb Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review J:1Dacuments\Development\D-3700\2019\PCA 32-19 T. Senoul\Repart1PCA 32-19 Repart.doc Attachments Exhibit 1 a Littleford Street Valley Gate T1 \ Sheppard Avenue Elizabeth B Phin Public School Fiddlers Court Q rOadirnson Court J Subject Lands — J 0 0 E 0) East Woodlands Park Rouge Hill Court C4 4 Location Map File: P/CA 32/19 PICKERING City Development Department Applicant: T. Serroul Property Description: Part of Lot 27, Plan 228 1427 Rougemount Drive Date: May. 15, 2019 The Corperahon of tha City of Pickering Produced( pan) under License m:e Queens Pnnter, omens Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;® Her Majesty the Queen in Right or Canada, Department of Natural Resources. AI Holds reserved.; DTeranel Enterprises Inc. and Its suppl,ers all rlghls reserved.;® MuNdpal Property Assessment Corporal fon and 0 suppaers all rights reserved.; SCALE: 1:5,000 THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF Sl1RVFY. 39 Exhibit 2 0 n ROUGEMOUNT DRIVE z y1----, 15.24 ,-: Z 0 i - REG'D N v •c z N Q1 W PLAN V 0 0 al II 228 Cod 150 „(Proposed) (Ex By -Low •1:8) N N --• . O O O y 1,50 !Proposed)-- y -Low a o N co co -� o y o , N To permit a minimum side yard of 1.5 metres. LOT 27 um Submitted Plan Cdp 4 File No: P/CA 32/19 PICKERING Applicant: T. Serroul City Development Property Description: Part of Lot 27, Plan 228 • Department (1427 Rougemount Drive) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 28 2019 Y + Exhibit 3 a• Ynxlm..IINIhiNIi.U.YInr.R,xllwf.HN11.pU ■inlit 'IVIVIWrY1.b.H1NIp 11111111N1�1II1gip11 IIv�I1IN/1111NN11111111II*FII1ng111tp1t11 OI11g1I1111111111111111111 I1 II1gi-,,,,, 11111tlN g1(1g11�1 221,1112222/11111 IIN]�a1NNgt111=u11]- a 11111111111111111111 II d11p/1 IgIgIiI 11 1g1I11UUN11� 111 Np11111N II �1N ! •., t111g`"�!=�_uN1 1111g111gt I1 NfIIN1Y%r '�""'�q�ll. 1Sp Cr `� , ' + [ .; I......1..,T al ills In ii I.x ybee ¢ a • J.rrrr �-..¢ rra mi -r SuPPLANA,P, . .may rr ■r o.� err 11r AN wari rrrr � V rr _� ' i�i' iiilll r. PIN sPn . „-.1er muniimino {®'� Bim` . lrr rr it ^ry . °"� ay it 1•I . � ' Irl _ �"-"' I'' G Iat _..,,, 3TA;cA 2200.0 • mmlcu • Front Elevation °"° 1rmCrr � a - a _ ormA ..,..� =min no oma • p mi "1 .ti fLZ' '..` .A� 11C� r r �� rr rr rill rr rr rr W ll ',, 1Tn ',i W� 1f�lC�C]� � ::. �_ 00101,` a� 1 r�41Si b 03 PPP iir. I1` .. : r •. �..�we� ,n + la,73aau2OAlx 1A' POUPPO c00GNL4E .1.• . 411scamp 0' c0NOp1E scaC _;=�Nlx w 11.1_r • , 210,1 As»lalr ING14 111NIp11N711uNNiill 111NN11111114111111Ci 1 11111 !I4 aa AHNGIES 111]I1111/I1111111111N]qi/111111Ifh1NI1rgt111'1111NNN1#s 11IIftJi$ 111Ii1I1g1$1UIIIIIIIINIII1g1IN111g111 Ilp]il. -i_ i 1111111N11114N1i��i 0000 02 I]IIII11gINN11Wg1/tn 112222//1111 111Iil1`1111rgPGi11 N11NNIINNNIiiliUl]gi1IN?, NUN 11111111NN r104 ,0211 11010 Tm .� I1g11I1g1/I1111s11111/ wuCAt I 11 WN1ltt/k1111pN11ggIi/INppNI MOM git!/INWWI ](IIINA GNIg11I] I nA Al !Il_..1111111111, 111U 1nIY, — 00 4F 'nw0ee LLlI h 7i. 1 e —_ Y �� �twis o wn nnvlwr' tV mJa�01mm �>lllll y 111 1'I" _;: it { �} ...1�E31— WINSS ZZI eleeai . oo ' v " '`-�"."GOA"" Right Side Elevation - � - _ wER11G4t POGO PICNE(5 .ci 4' 4A1IN15s) ?� �.+i. r. � J.J '� ■ — — o rb _o s — ZEE 56 4 SMS) n sp. GtlNG -! Alibi Illo . z ..+ .7"— III III li.. j s " W1 'sr •§ . 1 1'I 1 111 J FOP1 {� " 101 IAIIIii-111 1 j n • �, � 1MI OM 1APp ��.�� v a a 1 �i�� ':.. .u�,,.� E I4Wti aim �� •N -L'• r�.�IIIII IIIIIIII I IIIIIlII �. •••• ... __ ••. .-• —^_._ " 1 10' ra01.CA 11022016E .Nsua L PDAAID' coo PIA fY1. 0000 2 1 1 1 .,a.ua _: 1Y0°0 _ '.4i I__ awrol200 _' .L�',raurt ao`.b- .mwc _ =NC. MAI — L___ � r -'i' II X g __ _ 1 I U Glw,mrn�m Woe. 0I' NG t20i® SL R. a 4x. 11Au ER. A, s 0222/ avows 10,3213 A R- wp a' -o• L �{1,y1 � rte' --0020 1X1.5 crly Elevations 4 File No: PCA 32/19 PICKERING Applicant: T.Serroul • Property Description: Part of Lot 27, Plan 228 City Development (1427 Rougemount Drive) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I DATE: May 28, 2019 L• \Pian ing 1C o reMlannin g1A p ps1P CA12 D 19 C4 oh DICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 33/19 Date: June 12, 2019 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 33/19 Steele Valley Developments Ltd. 1300 Kingston Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 7553/17, as amended, to permit a 306 square metre outdoor display and sales use (garden centre) accessory to a food store, whereas a previous decision by the Committee of Adjustment permitted a 167 square metre outdoor display and sales use (garden centre) accessory to a food store, subject to conditions. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to permit an outdoor seasonal garden centre accessory to a food store to be located in the food store's parking lot. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the outdoor display and sales (garden centre) use, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the outdoor display and sales (garden centre) use shall only be permitted accessory to a food store located on the property.. 3. That the outdoor display and sales (garden centre) use shall not encumber the first row of parking spaces closest to the food store building, including any accessible parking space, and the last row of parking spaces closest to Kingston Road (refer to Exhibit 2). 4. That only one outdoor display and sales (garden centre) use shall be permitted on the property. 5. That the operation of the outdoor display and sales (garden centre) shall only be permitted from April 1 to August 1. 41 42Report P/CA 33/19 June 12, 2019 Page 2 Background In May of 2018, the City's By-law Enforcement Department received a complaint regarding an outdoor garden centre encroaching onto a sidewalk in front of the Pacific Market food store. Upon further review it was determined that an outdoor garden centre use was not permitted under the new City Centre Zoning By-law. To rectify this non-compliance, the tenant applied for and received minor variance approvals in 2018 and early 2019 to permit a temporary seasonal outdoor garden centre use located on the sidewalk. Subsequently, in May 2019 the applicant erected an outdoor garden centre in the parking area occupying 24 parking spaces. The applicant has applied for this minor variance application in order to permit the outdoor garden centre to be located in the parking area on an ongoing seasonal basis. The applicant is advised that a Temporary Permit will be required for the existing garden centre and will be required every year prior to the garden centre being erected. Comment Appropriateness of the Application Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject lands as "Mixed Use Areas — City Centre" within the City Centre Neighbourhood. This designation allows for the broadest range of uses, including; high density residential, retailing of goods and services, offices and restaurants, hotels, convention centres, and community, cultural and recreational uses. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The subject lands are zoned "CC1"— City Centre One within the City Centre Zoning By-law 7553/17, which permits a wide range of office, commercial, retail and residential uses, but does not permit an outdoor garden centre use. The Zoning By-law also places an "H" — Holding Symbol on the lands, which allows for the use of all existing lawful uses located in existing building or structures, but prevents development until such time that a block development plan is prepared and approved by City Council. The intent of the "CC1" Zone and the Holding Provision is to allow for currently existing uses and buildings, while also making provisions for the orderly redevelopment of the lands. The proposed use is intended to be accessory to the existing food store and does not represent a major redevelopment of the lands. A garden centre located in a parking area is a common accessory use to a food store. Within the City Centre, 1792 Liverpool Road is also zoned "CC1" and is currently occupied by Loblaws. The City Centre Zoning By-law contains an exception for 1792 Liverpool Road, which allows for a garden centre use on a seasonal basis located in the parking area. The Loblaws garden centre occupies approximately 1,541 square metres of the parking area and occupies Report P/CA 33/19 June 12, 2019 43 Page 3 77 out of a total of 640 parking spaces provided on the property (12 percent of the parking spaces). The proposed garden centre has an area of approximately 306 square metres and occupies 24 out of a total 242 parking spaces provided on the property (10 percent of the parking spaces). The proposed outdoor display and sales (garden centre) use accessory to a food store is consistent with other.uses within the City Centre. The recommended conditions will ensure that the proposed outdoor display and sales (garden centre) use remains accessory to the existing food store use. The subject property is currently occupied by a food store (Pacific Fresh Foods), two restaurants, a medical office and a retail store. For this combination of uses occupying the existing buildings, a total of 173 parking spaces are required by the Zoning By-law. With 24 parking spaces occupied by the garden centre, a total of 218 parking spaces are currently provided on the property; well in excess of the minimum required by the Zoning By-law. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land The outdoor display and sales (garden centre) use is intended to be accessory to the existing food store use and located in the parking area occupying a total of 24 parking spaces. Staff notes that one of the parking spaces currently occupied by the garden centre is an accessible parking space. Staff has been in discussion with the applicant who has agreed to reduce the size of the garden centre to leave the accessible parking space unencumbered for use by residents. In addition to leaving the accessible parking space unencumbered, staff recommends that the parking space directly adjacent to the east of the accessible space and closest to the food store, and the last two parking spaces closest to Kingston Road also remain uncovered by the garden centre. By removing the portion of the garden centre occupying these four spaces, improved sightlines will be provided for vehicles and pedestrians navigating the property. Staff recommend appropriate conditions limiting the size and location of the garden centre. Staff notes that the garden centre being located on the sidewalk adjacent to the food store also has the potential to create pedestrian conflicts and prevent safe pedestrian movement around the entrance to the store. Minor in Nature Conditions limiting the size and location of the use, the length of time which it may be open, ensuring that appropriate sightlines are provided, and ensuring that the accessible parking space remains unencumbered, will ensure that the garden centre does not have any significant impact on the surrounding area or subject lands. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to permit an outdoordisplay and sales (garden centre) use, subject to conditions, is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. "Report P/CA 33/19 June 12, 2019 Page 4 Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • no comments on the application Resident of Foleyet Crescent • concerned that the shape and size of the garden centre creates a safety issue and is not appropriate to be located in the parking lot • concerned that traffic on the site is already heavy and parking is often difficult to find, especially at dinner time, and the garden centre is making the situation worse • comments that the location of the garden centre blocks sightlines for cars and pedestrians, especially at the intersections of the drive aisles and the main plaza driveway • concerned that the sightlines are not sufficient for cars or pedestrians • concerned that an accessible parking spot is currently covered by the garden centre • requests that the variance be refused and that the garden centre be moved to its original location on the sidewalk Date of report: June 6, 2019 Comments prepared by: Rory McNeil Planner 1 RM:nwb • requests that at a minimum that the accessible parking spot be left unencumbered Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review J:tDocuments1Development0-3700\2019\PCA 33-19 Steele Valley Developments Ltd \Report\PCA 33-19 Report.doc Attachments Exhibit 1 • Malden Cresce 11111_I a> 'D 0 O 0 0 J 11 s 0) LL Glengrove Park „fr 1 Glenanna Road Brands Court 11111 11 I I/ I► I I I I►►► I Glengrove Public School 'D ca o o, 0) 0. c. oad Stio�Fl Subject Lands Picker 9,a Pickering Town Centre C4 4 Location Map File:. P/CA 33/19 PICKERING City Development Department Applicant: Steele Valley Developments Limited Property Description: Pt Lt 22, Con 1 & Pt BIk A, B Plan M998 now Pt 1-5, 12, 18,23, 40R-8184 (1300 Kinston Rd) Date: May. 15, 2019 4 The Corporation of the City y Pickering Pm duced On part) under license from: 0 Queens Printer, Ontario Ministry -fa Natural Resources. All rights reserved.g) Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. Al lights reserved.; ATeranet Enterprises lne.004 Its suppikrs all rights reserved.;® MunIclpel Property Assessment Corporation and ds supp5ers all rights reserve d; SCALE. 1.5,��� I THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. Exhibit 2 gg a j� rya` CENTFM s�P � Y� eurnze 7 • a f / / f f • �' ! gs / / \ ^.7 ' `o q. - , a P.a N I - C\ f IM:Q76iSE _ • EXISTING DRIVEWAY Existing Food Store n 3 a ExISTING RETAIL /1/i `\�ISTING �(ING DRIVcSNAY M • T O }/ ' Q.��to Parking Spaces Fp. iiiaTo mem �' permit an outdoor display and sales use say remain za r® (garden centre) accessory i unencumbered �k = to a foodstore. f* r a Mie �� -- IIMMMINNIIIIMOMMI 1 ' ISZZIVAtX ^Yo — — = Et— hlGGLANDSCAPED AREA Revised Plan • File No: PCA 33/19 01- PICKERING iApplicant: Steele Vaiiey Developments Limited Property Description: Pt Lt 22, Con 1 & Pt BIkA, B Plan M998 now Pt 1-5, 12, 18,23, 40R-8184 City Development (1300 Kingston Road) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWIN .0 AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CIN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 28, 2019 LAPlanni nglCorel1Planning\AppsYCAl2019 Ctry of DICKERING 47 Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 34/19 Date: June 12, 2019 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 34/19 S. Batonga 1240 Maple Ridge Drive Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1104/80 to permit an uncovered deck not exceeding 2.6 metres in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.5 metres into the required rear yard and not more than 0.5 of a metre in any required side yard, whereas the by-law requires uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.5 metres into any required rear yard and not more than 0.5 of a metre in any required side yard. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for an uncovered deck. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to theuncovered deck, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2 & 3). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by June 11, 2021, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan — "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the Liverpool Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1104/80 — "S2" 48 Report P/CA 34/19 June 12, 2019 Page 2 Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan The subject property is designated as "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the City of Pickering's Official Plan. Detached dwellings are a permitted use within the designation and built form in the Liverpool Neighbourhood. Staff is of the opinion that the variance meets the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The applicant is proposing to reconstruct an uncovered deck that connects to the first floor entrance on the detached dwelling. There is a significant difference in grade from the front of the dwelling to the rear lot line, which results in a walkout basement. The intent of provision 5.7(b), restricting the height of decks to 1.0 metre above grade, is in place to protect the privacy of abutting properties. The neighbouring properties to the east and west have existing decks greater than 1.0 metre in height due to the significant drop in grade from the front lot line to the rear lot line. Due to existing grades, the properties to the rear are not impacted. Staff is of the opinion that the variance meets the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land The applicant is proposing to replace an existing deck that is greater than 1.0 metre in height. The neighbourhing properties also have existing decks greater than 1.0 metre in height, therefore staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to permit a deck not exceeding 2.6 metres in height is desirable for the appropriate development of the land. Minor in Nature The request to reconstruct an uncovered deck that is greater than 1.0 metre in height is not anticipated to have any significant impact on the surrounding area and therefore, is considered minor in nature. Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to permit the reconstruction of a deck is desirable for the appropriate development of land, maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and is minor in nature. 49 Report P/CA 34/19 June 12, 2019 Page 3 Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: May 31, 2019 Comments prepared by: Tanjot Bal Planner I TB:nwb • no comments on the application Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review J:1Documents1fevelopment1f-3700120191PCA 34-19 S. Batonga\Repart'PCA 34-19 Report.doc Attachments Hydro Corridor pll. 'hdgro� Square 11111. 11111111' Maple Ridge Drive tl) n 0 0 0 111111111 oft 1•11111_ ••••• NMI NENE 111.11 rim fi, MEM Su L Co Urt Iimium Cedanvo° .' Coup RI; rr• Nu West Ravine Hydro Corridor gonna Court Exhibit 1 X1111►O mum ► ,IIIIItIIIIij,1 1111 ❑ rnblewoo E _z 1 �'=11,,1.°Num om01 ,111„' 4' rescent .— Subject ands == MEI mom NEN NEM St. Issac Jogues Separate School Gloucester Square 111 11111 Finch Avenue • r� I� mhos a� O m C Q) (13U Q) m ml m 01 6 co 0 n Halsey_Lane Maple Ridge Public School Bushmill Stree (0 0 O idge rk Barnwood Square Canborough n CD Lutterworth Court m PICKERING City Development Department Location Map File: P/CA 34/19 Applicant: S. Batonga Property Description: Lot 14, Plan M1202 1240 Male Ride Drive orpota •ono ie rtyo 'ic enng'm•uce• (n pan)u •er teens. om a eueens nnter, enta o sm- try o to .sources. All rgMs rese1555„5 Ser Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. M rlgh(s reserved.; DTeranet Enterprises lo, and Its suppF rs all rights reserved.;® MUMdpal Properly Assessment Corporation and ds supplers ell rights reserved.; Date: Ma . 15, 2019 SCALE: 1:5,000 THIS ISNOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. 51 Exhibit 2 . 1'►3 -31vt M ,., c 'I.o3 . . • • V _Propose,) Deck ice- o1K, • ' C 0,1 61►$Lhwt, Site Plan 4 PICKERING City Development Department • File No: P/CA 34/19 Applicant: S. Batonga Property Description: Lot 14, Plan M1202 (1240 Maple Ridge Drive) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: a 17, 2Oi 9 Y 52 Exhibit 3 To permit an uncovered deck not exceeding 2.6 metres in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.5 metres into the required rear yard and not more than 0.5 of a metre in any required side yard. L6lYQINf� aa+�`., aa+, t_ t 1 7'• -31 _ iow�r ====-3 =- E-33 C----�. 3 1„ , 5 L = x ° I'I'Ih� ! 19� a9� 1"111111 12 �'�I�JI9�9E36636 26266 26665 62209 ; {tia -------r �° 6�6 E°6a 1III ° °999QS999tl °E _ J 1 92, P!P9 21 OM 2�° 966623 2696°69° m a a fo �., N 4 _� o jn Tin II rI I FRONT ELEVATION 2 SIDE ELEVATION S1.I 3/16'=1'-0" SI ,I 3/16'=1'-0" 7'�1f ,, t. 'rr'xi © 3D VIEWS .1 ; ^�.�i '• 1K 111111` 41-,:" ,tiT t..,i. Ir{{t�up' r`I,ti ,,,:t,. } .f T I III I1 ' (! —�, lla ,,,,,i, 1 �>_ fI�� S:� f 1 �M PR' -KiM r i? t -x+ 1 i ____------ y.,M��•- �-� fj,' / I;;iSI L Ill Is,- !ta115��... ( =' Mill•� .;-. <,. ��� u ILII �i �) I III ,: fI �II'�III ' ��llt JE.I �, �. Yt \ �I� € : ::iiv jjj -3.,3i3E `�llj}� _\ I 1 I\ t. Y :1 :; •. .' �I �\ ____ ICY 1 r . {{I \t' .E;, of ff1 - _. 11 m II ; ti •� T 1 t 1 � Elevations 6th 4 File No: P/CA 34/19 PICKERING Applicant: S. Batonga City Development Property Description: Lot 14, Plan M1202 Department (1240 Maple Ridge Drive) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 17, 2019 y Cdy of DICKERING 53 Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 35/19 Date: June 12, 2019 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 35/19 R. & M. Fernandez 1102 Petunia Place Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1701/83 to permit: • a covered platform projecting 2.6 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the by-law requires uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project not more than 1.5 metres into any required rear yard • an accessory building (chimney) to be 4.2 metres in height, whereas the by-law requires no accessory buildings to exceed a height of 3.5 metres in any residential zone. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to construct a covered platform. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the proposed variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the covered platform, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by June 11, 2021, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan — "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the Rougemount Neighbourhood. Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1701/83 — "S3" 54 Report P/CA 35/19 June 12, 2019 Page 2 Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan The subject property is designated as "Urban Residential Areas — Low Density Areas" within the City of Pickering's Official Plan. Lands within this designation are intended to accommodate uses including residential uses. The proposed covered platform will be accessory to the main residential use. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law 1. Variance for Projection into Rear Yard The intent of the zoning by-law provision requiring maximum projections of platforms into the rear yard is to ensure that any structure can be appropriately maintained without having to encroach onto abutting properties, to minimize any adverse impact on adjacent neighbours such as privacy and to ensure that an adequate outdoor amenity area is provided within the rear yard. The proposed covered platform (measured from the limit of the roof) will project 2.6 metres into the required rear yard setback of 7.5 metres while maintaining a 4.9 metres setback from the rear property line. The covered platform contributes to the outdoor amenity area within the rear yard. 2. Accessory Building Height Variance The intent of the maximum accessory structure height of 3.5 metres is to minimize the visual impact of accessory buildings on abutting properties and on the streetscape, and to ensure other yards are not significantly obstructed by these structures on the property. The proposed maximum height of the chimney is 4.2 metres and will be only 0.3 of a metre higher than the peak of the adjacent roof of the proposed covered platform. The height of the proposed covered platform satisfies the maximum height requirement of the Zoning By-law for accessory structures. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land The proposed covered platform and chimney contribute to the amenity space in the rear yard of the subject property and would maintain the amount of usable space in the rear yard. Minor in Nature The request for a covered platform projecting 2.6 metres into the rear yard and for an accessory building (chimney) to be a maximum of 4.6 metres in height is not anticipated to have any significant impact on the surrounding area and therefore, is considered minor in nature. Report P/CA 35/19 June 12, 2019 Page 3 Conclusion Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, are minor in nature, and maintain the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • no comments on the application Date of report: June 3, 2019 Comments prepared by: Felix Chau Planner I FC:nwb Deborah Wylie, " CIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review J:1Documents\Development'D-3700\2019tPCA 3549 R. & M. Fernandez \ReporttPCA 35-19 Report.doc Attachments 55 Exhibit 1 0 () m 0 0 0 Rouge Valley Park Howell Crescent St. Monica's Separate School hardson Street == ittleford StreetMEMMINIMMEM gml vim kfii- - � Stove Crescent /111111 11 Subject .:;::5.�\� p11111 -pv:q if ,, ♦�I, weg°AV'm ,§3 t mL '' iiii1111� dIUIII11I1I► Rouge Valley Park Valley Gate • Rougemount Drive Elizabeth B. Phin Public School u Fiddlers Court m °m/inson Court cc m 0 II* is I Brookridge Gad` 11 111 TT _ Dad stop R ��r9 C4 4 Location Map File: P/CA 35/19 PICKERING City Development Department Applicant: R. & M. Fernandez Property Description: Lot 14, Plan 40M-1318 Petunia Place) Date: May. 15, 2019 41102 he Corporation of ffie City of Pickering Produced (in pan) under license from 0 Queens Pnnter, Ontario Mmstry of Natural Resource+. All rights reserved ,® Her Ma$esy the Queen In Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. AS rights reserved.; 0 Terenet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers all rights received .;0 Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and Es suppEers all elgh.+resented.; SCALE. 1:5 e000 THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. Exhibit 2 57 To permit a covered platform projecting 2.6 metres into the required rear yard. N16° 57' 36"W • • PROPERTY 2 STOREY BRICK _ -- 45.51' 1 --g, UNE j' '4,, EXISTING & FRAME DWELLING -- m PROPOSED N COVERED rn PATIO SLAB '`I' n � 1 I m / 7..: -.'ea ( N INQ aog 1626422481/ f� 1295 M " to % � 1 EXISTING 2 STOREY • I I BRICK & FRAME DWELLING EXISTING 2 STOREY BRICK & FRAME DWELLING / z I 1 EXISTING 2 STOREY BRICK FRAME DWELLING N r 10949 f w 'A 41 `'-� "• d o Z I--- ec I . PROPE EXISTING RICK & FRAME ATACHED GARAGE o . 'r— zi —I i J if.o1--------- --- ._ a D. I _. q, EXISTING DRIVEWAY � 0� ��OQ 0 9 ,P 4399 S42° 41.82' __ 44' 36"E '`` 1 51\/ Site Plan C4 °d File No: P/CA 35/19 PICKERING Applicant: R. & M. Fernandez City Development Property Description: Lot 14, Plan 40M-1318 • Department (1102 Petunia Place) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 29, 2019 Y 58 Exhibit 3 To permit an accessory building (chimney) to be 4.2 metres in height. East Elevations ROOF PLAN_ 3050 di U/S OF BEAM 2250 EXISTING FIN. MAIN FLOOR 300 OGRADE 7 US of footi�n -1220 West Elevations 3402 ROOF PLAN 3050 U/S OF BEAM ic 2250 EXISTING FIN. MAIN FLOOR 300 GRADE 0 US of footin• -1220 C% of PICKERING City Development Department East and West Elevations File No: P/CA 35/19 Applicant: R. & M. Fernandez Property Description: Lot 14, Plan 40M-1318 (1102 Petunia Place) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: May 29, 2019 Exhibit 4 LtPiannin gtCorePlanninglApps1PCAt2019 al 10,71 -- 5f / 11 _ , 1. ! Jx�. "'lll +Ll`�' O Ye,4 I.��i . (* { '^ Gj F, .......111�'a'; 4 !Lri,..7 -w. 3 ;,.;:. t �,. 14g 4— .,- ,�(Ny :. C• Yl '� •, :,f•,� ( Tr - „�iB P'wArkii �^l�.M . '"a^ y -.e T ._.. �� t .�� ,�.r4 �r m"� f V. :4 .A . ti lY Y+'' i C r . is '4 . IY¢ t -a6 �,� • { BACK PERSPECTIVE PERSPECTIVE NW �A. - Ttl4 ,® PERSPECTIVE NE Perspectives C4 1 File No: P/CA 35/19 o&1 P 1 C KE RI N G Applicant: R. & M. Fernandez Property Description: Lot.14, Plan 40M-1318 City Development (1102 Petunia Place) Department FU LL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLEFOR VIEWING ATTHE CITY OFPICKERING - CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. r. DATE: May 29, 2019 t LtPiannin gtCorePlanninglApps1PCAt2019