Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSeptember 13-C~of­ PJCKERJNG Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Eric Newton Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 13, 2017 7:03pm Council Chambers That applications PICA 62117 to PICA 66117 by Mattamy (Seaton) Limited, be Approved on the grounds that these minor variance applications to permit street townhouse dwellings on Part of Block 45 on the Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2009-13 (Phase 2) in a "Low Density Type 1 (LD1 )"Zone are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to Part of Block 45 on Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2009-13 (Phase 2), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the proposed street townhouse dwellings be constructed in accordance with Zoning By-law 7364114 "Low Density Type 2 -Multiple (LD2-M)" Zone performance standards. That applications PICA 67117 to PICA 75117 by Mattamy (Seaton) Limited, be Approved on the grounds that these minor variance applications to permit detached dwellings on Block 47 with Lane on the Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2009-13 (Phase 2) in a "Low Density Type 2 -Multiple (LD2-M)" Zone are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to Block 47 with Lane on Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2009-13 (Phase 2), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the proposed detached dwellings be constructed in accordance with Zoning By-law 7364114 "Low Density Type 1 (LD1 )"Zone performance standards. Carried Unanimously Page 3 of 8 -C~of­ PJCKERJNG 2. (Deferred at the August 23, 2017 meeting) PICA 77117 D. Naumovski 1953 Spruce Hill Road Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 13, 2017 7:03pm Council Chambers The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum north side yard setback of 1.2 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct a two-storey detached dwelling. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from a resident at 1962 Spruce Hill Road in objection to the application. Dimce Naumovski, applicant, was present to represent the application. Malcolm Schell was present in objection to the application. Malcolm Schell stated the variance is not a requirement of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and there is no need for the variance. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Dimce Naumovski stated the southern retaining wall is on the neighbour's property and will be their responsibility to replace. In response to a question from a Committee Member, the Secretary-Treasurer stated the letter that was received in opposition is from a resident who resides across the street from the subject property. A Committee Member noted that the increased south side yard setback of 1.93 metres was a request only and not a requirement by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, and that any requirement to refurbish and maintain a retaining wall (and related extra space) is not a requirement of the applicant but of the neighbour to the south who is not in attendance at this hearing. The Committee Member also noted that a reduced north side yard setback has a potential impact on tree maintenance, and that meeting the required north side yard setback of 1.5 metres will still provide an excess of the 1.5 metre requirement on the south side. Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Denise Rundle That application PICA 77117 by D. Naumovski, be Refused on the grounds that the minimum north side yard setback of 1.2 metres is major, and not desirable for the appropriate development of the land. Carried Unanimously Page 4 of 8 -Cif:jof- PJCKERJNG 4. PICA 78117 D. & M. Patterson 1376 Everton Street Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 13, 2017 7:03pm Council Chambers The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 4325173: • to permit an accessory structure greater than 10 square metres in area to be set back 0.6 of a metre from the rear lot line; whereas the by-law requires accessory structures greater than 10 square metres in area to be set' back a minimum of 1.0 metre from all lot lines • to permit accessory buildings, excluding private detached garages, to have a total lot coverage not exceeding 8.8 percent of the total lot area; whereas the by-law requires that the total lot coverage of all accessory buildings, excluding private detached garages, shall not exceed 5 percent of the lot area • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 36.8 percent; whereas the by-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to construct an accessory building (shed) and a covered porch. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Derek Patterson, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Derek Patterson stated the intended use of the shed is for woodworking. Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Denise Rundle That application PICA 78117 by D. & M. Patterson, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the shed and covered porch, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by September 13, 2019, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously Page 6 of 8 -C~of­ PJCKERJNG 5. PICA 81117 L. Black 1019 Maury Crescent Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 13, 2017 7:03pm Council Chambers The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1699183: • to permit an uncovered platform (deck) and associated steps not exceeding 2.4 metres in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.0 metres into the required rear yard; whereas, by-law requires uncovered steps and platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade may project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard • to permit an accessory building to be set back a minimum of 0.5 of a metre from the south and west lot lines; whereas the by-law requires accessory buildings not exceeding 10 square metres in size and not exceeding 1.8 metres in height, to be setback a minimum of 0.6 metres from all lot lines The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct an uncovered platform (deck) and associated steps, and to recognize an existing accessory building (shed) in the rear yard. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Steve Wall, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Tom Copeland That application PICA 81117 by L. Black, be Approved on the grounds that the uncovered platform (deck) and associated steps not exceeding 2.4 metres in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.0 metre into the required rear yard, and an existing accessory building (shed) to be setback a minimum of 0.5 of a metre from the south and west lot lines, are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed second storey uncovered platform (deck) and existing accessory building (shed), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. Page 7 of 8