Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout August 2, 2017 pickering.ca Committee of Adjustment Agenda Meeting Number: 10 Date: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Lesley Dunne T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024 Email ldunne@pickering.ca Agenda Committee of Adjustment Wednesday, August 2, 2017 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Page Number (I) Adoption of Agenda (II) Adoption of Minutes from July 12, 2017 1-13 (III) Reports 1. (Deferred at the July 12, 2017 meeting) P/CA 47/17 D. Barkey 1712 Central Street 14-18 2. (Deferred at the July 12, 2017 meeting) P/CA 50/17 P. Cummins 1796 Fairport Road 19-24 3. (Deferred at the July 12, 2017 meeting) P/CA 51/17 K. Storey & R. Kay 5049 Brock Road 25-30 4. (Deferred at the July 12, 2017 meeting) P/CA 52/17 to P/CA 54/17 M. Casey 1307 Commerce Street 31-37 5. P/CA 59/17 S. Mikhail 1815 Fairport Road, Unit 10 38-41 6. P/CA 60/17 T. & M. Kuteyi 1815 Fairport Road, Unit 4 42-46 7. P/CA 61/17 P. & J. Kukic 1815 Fairport Road, Unit 8 47-51 (IV) Adjournment -Cdfj~f­ pJ(KERJNG· Pending Adoption Present. Tom Copeland-Vice-Chair Eric Newton Denise Rundle Sean Wiley Also Present Deborah Wylie, Secretary-Treasurer Samantha O'Brien, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Absent David Johnson -Chair Committee of Adjustment 1 Meeting Minutes Wednesday, July 12, 2017 7:07pm Main Committee Room Tom Copeland, Vice-Chair stated that he will abstain from voting on all applications heard for the Wednesday, July 12, 2017 Committee of Adjustment meeting, and will only vote in the · event of a tie vote. (I) Adoption of Agenda Moved by Denise Rundle · Seconded by Eric Newton That Item #7 be moved forward, and that the revised agenda for the Wednesday, July 12, 2017 meeting be adopted. (II) .A-doption of Min~tes Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Denise Rundle Carried Unanimously , . That the minutes of the 8th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held We(lnesday, June 21, 2017 be adopted. :Carried Page 1 of 13 2 (Ill) Reports 1. · PICA 52117, PICA 53117 & PICA 54117 M. Casey 1307 Commerce Street Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, July 12, 2017 7:07pm Main Committee Room The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended: • to peimit a minimum lot frontage of 12.0 metres, whereas ·the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres · • to permit a minimum lot area of 324 square metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 460 square metres · • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 48 percent, whereas the by-law requi'res a ma?(imum lot coverage of 33 percent • to permit a minimum side yard setback of 1.2 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres • to permit a minimum front yard setback of 4.5 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum front. yard setback of 7.5 metres • to permit a covered platform to project a maximum of 1.8 metres into the required front yard, whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard The applicant requests approval of these variances in-order to facilitate the creation of a total of three lots through the Region of Durham Land Division Committee, and obtain building permits for the construction of three detached dwellings. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending refusal. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were receivedfrom a resident of 1303 Commerce Stre~t in support of the application. The resident indicated that the rental house and property is an 'eyesore', support for the proposed higher density development, semi-detached and townhouse units can be found within a 250 metre radius and support smaller lots with wider site coverage with height controls. · Craig Marshall, agent, was present to represent the application. Page 2 of 13 -04~1-.­ P1CKER1NG . Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Eric Newton Committee of Adjustment 3 Meeting Minutes ' Wednesday, July 12, 2017 7:07pm Main Committee Room That applications PICA 52117, PICA 53117 and PICA 54117 (Proposed Lots 1, 2 & 3) by M. Casey, be Deferred to the August 2, 2017 meeting on the grounds that an additional variance has been added to the application which requires a revised Notice to be recirculated to the public in accordance with the Planning Act. 2. PICA 36117 Fampa Holdings Ltd. 962 Kingston Road Carried Unanimously The applicant requests r~lief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2498187: • to permit a vehicle sales or rental establishment, whereas the by-law does not permit a vehicle sales or rent~l establishment • to permit the open storage of vehicles in all yards, whereas the by-law does not ·permit open storage in any yard . The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to permit a vehicle sales or rental establishment use on the subject lands. / The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval. Written comments were received from the City's E~gineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the Ronda Pfeiffer, Building Manager of 944 Merritton Road indicated there are citing ·difficulty for patients and staff getting into· and out of 944 Merritton Road due to congestion and parking on Merritton Road. It was also indicated that relief has been experienced as employees from a neighbouring business are now parking on the subject lands, ~62 Kingston Road and that major congestion will return if the subject lands are rezoned for vehicle sales or rental. Written comments were received from Frank Mihalek and Roberta Case owners·of 950 Merritton Road in opposition to the application. The owners expressed several concerns among them that employees of the Formula Ford dealership at 940 Kingston Road park on both sides of Merritton Road for extended periods causing congestion and concern~ for safety, that auto transport trailers regularly park on Merritton Road . blocking access to Merritton Road, that the subject lands at 962 Kingston Road are . being used for vehiCle storage prior to approval of variances, and that shuffling vehicles between 940 and 962 Kingston Road will create more congestion and safety issues. Page 3 of 13 4 -04of~~ P1CKER1NG Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, July 12, 2017 7:07pm Main Committee·Room Paul Rycroft, agent, was present to represent the application. Frank Mihalek, co-owner of 950 Merritton Road was present in objection to the application. Vernon Bruce of. 975 Merritton Road was aiso present in objection to the application.· No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Frank Mihalek spoke in objection to· the application and to the written comments th.at were received prior) to the meeting. · Vernon Bruce spoke indicating his opposition to the proposed variances and concurred with the objections of the other property owners along Merritton Road. He also noted the extreme danger impeding emergency service vehicles (i.e., Fire Services, Ambulance, Police, etc.) caused by vehicle congestion along Merritton Hoad and Kingston Road. In response to questions from Committee members, Paul Rycroft agreed that the current zoning requires a minimum of nine parking spaces which they intend to exceed. He also stated they are not proposing any alterations to the existing site plan of the subject property. A Committee Member stated concern with the proposal not being subject to site plan review, introducing the new use of 'vehicle sales' and the removal of a prohibition for open storage. The Committee Member indicated that these matters are major variances and should be subject to a rezoning. Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Sean Wiley That application PICA 36/17 by Fampa Holdings Ltd., be Refused on the grounds that the requested variances for vehicles sales use and open storage are major in nature, ·and not .keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. 3. PICA 44/17 G. & G. Mattia 677 Front Road Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended: • to permit a minimum north side yard width of 1.2 metres and a minimum south side yard width of 0.6 of a metre, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling; whereas the by-law requires a miQimur:n side yard width of 1.5 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling Page 4 of 13 ) . Committee of Adjustment 5 Meet_ing Minutes Wednesday, July 12, 2017 · ·7:07-pm Main Committee Room • to permit a.maximum lot coverage of 39 percent; whereas the by-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent • to permit all accessory buildings, excluding private detached garages, to have a total lot coverage not exceeding 11.5 percent of the lot area; whereas the by-law requires that tlie. total lot coverage of all accessory buildings, excluding private detached garages, shall not exceed 5 percent of the lot area · • ·to recognize a minimum lot frontage of 7.6 metres; whereas the by-law requires,a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres • to recognize a minimum lot area of 331.8 square metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 465 square metres The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to construct a detached dwelling c;~nd accessory building. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development· Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department indicating the existing tree in front of the subject property is on the Municipal right-of-way; the City will not permit the removal of the tree forth~ relocation of the driveway; the propos.ed dwelling should be setback to match the existing dwelling and the driveway access must be kept on the north side of the property in order to protect the tree and root system; tree protection fencing must be erected and maintained during the extent of construction; any tree limb or root removal that may be required must be. do_ne by a certified arborist under the supervision of the City's arborist and the City's standard tree protection notes and detail must be adhered to. · Written comments were received from the Director, City Development & CBO indicating the proposed dwelling requires. a building permit; and that as part of the building permit process the applicant may be required to retain a professional engineer to undertake the necessary designs to demonstrate that construction and excavation will not damage the adjacent property. Written comments were also received from the owners of 675 Front Road in opposition to the application. The residents expressed several concerns with the narrow south side yard setback which may result in the structural integrity of their home; that the proposed dwelling should not have windows on the riorth side as per the fire code; the removal of a large healthy mature tree that provides shade and supports local wildlife; a decrease in property value and that a ·smaller, less imposing dwelling would better suit the surrounding neighbourhood. Page 5 of 13 6 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes . Wednesday, July .12, 2017 7:07pm Main Committee Room Giuseppe Mattia, applicant, was present to repr~sent the application. Arthur Bronkhorst of 679 Front Road was also present to receive additional information on the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Arthur Bronkhorst requested when the garage straddling the property line is partially demolished that the applicant replace and repair the exposed garage wall of the remaining structure; and that the variance to allow pCcessory buildings to exceed 5 percent of the lot area not be approved. In response to questions from Arthur Bronkhorst, the Secretary-Treasurer stated a variance for t~e proposed front yard setback is not required. In response to questions from the Committee Members, Giuseppe Mattia stated he is currently aware that the tree is on the municipal right-of-way and is to remain. Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 44117 by G. & G .. Mattia, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general .intent and purpose of the Official Plan· and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the detached dwelling and accessory building, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July. 12, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. • • 4. PICA 47117 D. Barkey 1712 Central Street ca·rried Unanimously . . · The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640106: • to permit a minimum distance of 2.4 metres from the proposed gas bar canopy to the street lines of Central Street and Brock Road, whereas the by-law requires a minimum distance of 12.0 metres between any building or structure and any street line Page 6 of 13 -C~()f­ p](KERJNG. Committee of Adjustment 7 Meeting Minutes Wednesday, July 12, 2017 7:07pm Main Committee Room • to permit a proposed gas bar canopy to be erected 11.0 metres from the centerline of Brock Road, whereas the by-law does not permit rio building or structure to be erected closer than 19.5 metres to the centerline of Brock Road The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain site plan approval for a proposed gas bar canopy. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from a resident of 5010 Wixson Street, in opposition to the application. The resident expressed several concerns including that the height of the proposed canopy would dominate the look and feel at the four corners of the hamlet; light pollution would glow into the backyard, kitchen and bedroom; the safety of pedestrian traffic to ahd from the nearby school would be impacted; traffic would be increased and blind spots at the adjacent roads of the intersection would be created. Neither the applicant nor agent were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. · Moved by Eric Newton · Second~d by Denise Rundle That application PICA 47117 by D. Barkey, be Deferred to the next Committee of Adjustment meeting to allow for representation to be present. 5. PICA 48117 & PICA 49117 N. & F. Nohos 1937 Rosebank Road Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 3009189 to permit a minimum lot frontage of 12.9 metres; wherea$ the by~law permits a minimum lot frontage of 13.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of these minor: variance applications in order to create one additional lot through the Region of Durham Land Division Committee and o~tain a building permit to construct a two-storey detached dwelling on the proposed severed and retained parcels. Page 7 of 13 8 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, July 12, 2017 7:07pm Main Committee Room The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City'_s Engineering Services Department expressing no · comments on the application. · Neither the applicant nor agent were present to represent the application. No further representation·was present in favpur of or in objection to the application. Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 48/17 by N. & F. Nahas, be Approved on the grounds that the minimum lot frontage of 1'2.9 metres is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate develppment of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed lot configuration, as generally sited and outlined as Part 1 and Part 2 on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain final clearance for Land Division Application .(LD 067 /17) by July 17, 2018 or this d~cision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant obtain .a building permit for the proposed construction by July 12, 2019, or this de.cision shall become null and void. Thc;~t application PICA 49/17 by N. & F. Nahas, be Approved on the grounds that the minimum lot frontage of 12.9 metres is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed lot configuration, as generally sited and outlined as Part 1 and Part 2 on the applicanfs submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain final clearance for Land Division Application (LD 067 /17) by July 17, 2018' or this decision shall become null and void: 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July 12, 2019, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously Page 8 of 13 -C~()~­ p](KERJNG 6. PICA 50117 ·p. Cummins 1796 Fairport Road Committee of Adjustment 9 Meeting Minutes Wednesday, July 12, 2017 7:07pm Main Committee Room The applicant requests relief .from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling; whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 1.8 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling. The applicant requests approval of this variance jn order to obtain a building permit for the construction of a detached dwelling. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending refusal. The Secretary-Treasurer also outlined if the applicant were to amend the application to allow side yard widths of 1.5 metres, staff ·recommendation would be for approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Neither the applicant nor agent were present to represent the application. No further representation. was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Eric Newton That applicati9n PICA 50117 by D. Barkey, be Deferred to the next Committee of Adjustment meeting to allow for representation to be present. 7. PICA 51117 K. Storey & R. Kay 5049 Brock Road Carried Unanimously · The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640106: • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 22 percent; whereas the by-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 20 percent . • to permit an accessory building_with a maximum height of 4.2 metres in a rE3sidential zone; whereas the by-law requires that no accessory building shall exceed a height of 3.5 metres in any residential zone • to recognize a minimum lot area of 1180.3 square metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 1390.0 square metres .Page 9 of 13 · 10 -C~()~-· - P1CKER1NG r Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, July 12, 2017 7:07pm Main Committee Room • to recognize a minimum front yard depth of 0.0 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard depth of 9.0 metres • to recognize a minimum exterior side yard depth of 0.0 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard depth of 4.~ metres The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain building permits to construct an addition to the existing detached dwelling and to construct an accessory building (detached garage). The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommen.dation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. · Rebecca Kay, applicant, was present to represent th~ .. application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. I A Committee Member stated 0.0 metre setbacks are not favoured and suggested if the applicant were to revise the plans to maintain the larger existing dwelling and demolish the second dwelling to the west it would be in compliance with the current zoning by-laws. The Committee Member also recommended that a condition be put forth for demolition take place prior to the construction of a new dwelling. In response to a question from a Committee Member, the Secretary-Treasurer indicated that the Building Services Section would be requested to verify the sequence of demolition and construction permits where two bLJildings exist on a property. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Rebecca Kay stated she would like to discuss considering an additional condition for demolition to take place prior to issuance of construction for a new dwelling with co-applicant Kevin Storey. Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Sean Wiley That application PICA 51/17 by K. Storey & R. Kay be Deferred to the next Committee of Adjustment meeting to allow for the both applicants to discuss a possible condition .of requiring demolition of a dwelling prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of a new dwelling. Carried Unanimously Page 10 of 13 · -C~o~--­ PICKERING 8.. PICA 55117 & PICA 56117 J. Roche & J. Cusimano 1474 Rougemount Drive Committee of Adjustment 11 Meeting Minutes Wednesday, July 12, 2017 7:07pm Main Committee Room The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2912188: • to permit a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres; whereas the by-law permits a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres • to permit a mini~um side yard-width of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling; whereas the by-law permits a mininiu~ side yard width of 1.8 me~res where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling The applicant requests approval of these minor variance applications in order to create one additional lot through the Region of Durham La~d Division Committee and obtain a building permit to construct a two-storey detached dwelling on the proposed severed and retained parcels. · · The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development_ Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the applications. Paul Demczak, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present ih favour of or in objection to the application. · In response to questions from Committee Members, Paul Demczak stated the applicants have received approval of these variances in the past however allowed for the. previous applicati.ons to lapse due to costs to apply for severance to the Region of Durham Land Division Committee. - Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Eric Newton That applications PICA 55117 and PICA 56117 by J. Roche & J. Cusimano, be Approved on the grounds that the minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres and a minimum side yard width of f5 metres where a garage is erected are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed lot configuration, as generally sited and outlined as Part 1 and Part 2 on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain final clearance for Land Division Application (LD 1 04117) by July 17, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. Page 11 of 13 12 -C~()~­ p](KER1NG Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, July 12, 2017 7:07pm Main Committee Room 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July 12, 2019 or this decision affecting the proposed detached dwellings shall become null and void. 9. PICA 57117 W. Ayub 1135 Ridgewood Court Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2864188: • to permit a minimum rear yard depth of 4.9 metres to a proposed sun room addition; whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres · • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 44 percent; whereas the by-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to construct a second storey addition (sunroom) and associated steps in the rear yard. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development -Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. lvars Kulitis, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. · In response to questions from Committee Members, lvars Kulitis stated the sunroom is accessible froni both the interior of the house as well as the rear yard. He also stated that they have obtained a TRCA permit which is required at the Building Permit stage. Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Eric Newton -That application PICA 57117 byW. Ayub, b·e Approved on the grounds that the minimum rear yard depth of 4.9 metres and a maximum lot coverage of 44 percent, are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed second storey sunroom addition and associated steps, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. Page 12 of 13 -C~o~­ PJCKERJNG Committee of Adjustment 13 Meeting Minutes Wednesday, July 12, 2017 7:07pm Main Committee Room 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July 12, 2019, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously (IV) Adjournment Date Chair Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Eric Newton That the 9th meeting of the 2017 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 8:27 pm and the ·next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on VVednesday,August2,2017. Carried Unanimously Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Page 13 of 13 ---------~----- 14 -C~~~--­ p](KERJNG From: Deporah Wylie, MClP, RPP Report to Committee-of Adjustment _ Application Number: PICA 47117 Date: July 12, 2017 Principal Planner-Development Review Subject: Application Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 47i17 D. Barkey 1712 Central Street The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640106: • to permit a minimum distance of 2.4 metres from the proposed gas bar canopy to the street lines of Central Street and -Brock Road, whereas the by-law r.equires a minimum distance of 12.0 metres between any building or structure and any street line -' • to permit a proposed gas bar canopy to be erected',11.0 metres from the centerline of Brock Road, whereas the by-law does not permit no building-or structure to be erected closer than 19.5 metres to the centerline of Brock Road The applicant requests approval of these variances in .order to obtain site plan approval for a proposed gas bar canopy~ - Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variances to be minor in nt;tture, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval -of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: \ 1. · That these variances apply only to the proposed gas bar canopy, as generally sited and · outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain site plan ~pproval for the proposed construction by July 12, 2018,- or this decision shall become null and void. · Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Oak Ridges Moraine Rural Hamlets" within the Claremont Settlement Area Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640106-"ORM-C2" Report PICA 047/17 July 12, 2017 ·Page 2 Appropriateness of the Application • the by-law requires C~ny building or structure be a minimum of 12.0 metres from any street line and does not permit a building or structure to be erected closer than 19.5 metres to the centerline of Brock Road . . · ' • the applicant is requesting a gas bar canopy to be located 2.4 metres from the street lines of Central Str!3et and Brock Road and 11 .0 metres from the centerline of Brock Road • the proposed canopy is intended to revitalize the aesthetics of the existing gas bar and provide a protective cover for patrons • the proposed canopy will be supported by two columns which wi.ll be based where the current gar bar pumps are located • the gas bar pumps have ·existed in the current location for numerous years and are not proposed to be moved • the proposed gas bar canopy is required to obtain Site Plan Approval and is currently subject to an active site plan application · • the applicant'~ proposal was reviewed by the Site Plan Advisory Committee on June 28, 2017 and no concerns regarding the gas bar canopy were raised • the distance between the gas bar canopy and the street lines of Central Street and Brock Road, and centerline of Brock Road is calculated by measuring to the shortest distance, which is the edge of the canopy's roof • an appropriate distance will be .maintained between the columns supporting the proposed canopy and the street lines of Central Street and. Brock Road • the proposed canopy will be entirely unenclosed and will not result in a negative visual impact on the streetscape of Central Street or Brock Road . · • the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintain the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: July 6, 2017 Comments. prepared by: CM:DW:Id • J:\Da.cuments\Davelapment\D-3700\20171PCA47-17\Repart\PCA 47-17 Rapartdac Attachments • no comments on the application Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review 15. v 1--- 1---1--- I A ,n:: . I I I . ~---~,-~ ,..~--1 __ --1 I . I ~==~----~t~----~ f-\--------'-------1 ~ r----,.-----.J}-..,-------r--,---~· 1-,r--r-----rtli--rl .. H ~L 1-~-.---------,----1 ( I I I=-~~---~~~~f-~~i+------lll / ; ~ 1---l_l----l-__j----tl~ . I \1-! -. -·Ct!t; l<J-' P1CKER1NG- City Development Department 1-----1-----1 Location Map File: PICA 47/17 Applicant:D. Barkey Property Description: Plan 12 Part Lot 1 & 3. RP 40R15501 Part 1 (1712 Central Street) Date: May. 31, 2017 ~,T:geh~~:e~:~~~~e~~;z'po:::e~'!::~u~1;~(:f';;~a~~~e;11;::oe~~~:~=~~~=~~~~~~:!%:~.~atLm! Resources. SCALE: 1 :5,QQQ I C Teranet Enterprises In:. and lis suppliers al rfghls reserJed.; C Municipal Prop!lrty Assessment Corpcrnllon and Its suppDera all rights reserved.; THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. P N-R U , I . 1 -~ to permit the proposed gas bar canopy to be erected 11.0 metres from the centreline of Brock Road \Ol I \ : ""0\ :;o· . ~· ~~ . Sj:l \ :;! it I(") . ~'\ \i !z . 1"1' i : I'Jl> I it 1'1::1 \t I 1:, t --------------- p~_tJ~-----'P ----~ I ~--I' \ I I \ EXJS11NG SEPllC s)OTEM \ \ I TO WAIN I I I I I I -I \ L-----_1, I \ to permit a minimum !1----\~\1:::~~~~~~~~~.,---~-L--J distance of 2.4 metres 1; from the proposed gas bar canopy to the street lines of Central Street and Brock Road \\ I' I' --. . \:::-\\ -···-1]' ~ -.. -.. ·--""\ ......... --~4-­ PlCKERlNG City Development Department 1'. N Submitted Plan FILE No: .P/CA 47/17 .APPLICANT: o~ Barke PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 12 Part Lot 1 & 3 RP 40R15501 Part 1 .(1712 Central Street) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING - CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE:· June 28, 2017 17 18 @ SIDE ELEV ITIO~le•1·so -U~o~­ Pl(KERJNG City Development Department Submitted Plan . FILE No: P/CA 47/17 APPLICANT: 0~ Barke PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 12 Part Lot 1 & 3 RP 40.R15501 Part 1 (1712 Central Street) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: June 28, 20i7 -Cfit;~f­ p·J(KERJNG .From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP · . 19 Report to . Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 50117 · Date: July 12, 2017 Principal Planner-Development Review -. Subject: . Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 50117 P. Cummins 1796 Fairport Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling; whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 1.8 metres, where a garage is erected as. part of a detached dwelling. "' The applicant requests approval of this· variance in order to obtain a building permit for the construction of a detached dwelling. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a side yard width of 1.2 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling,.to be a major variance that is not considered to be desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends R~fusal of the proposed variance. or If the applicant were to request that the application be amended to. permit a side yard width of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling, the following· recommendation would apply: The City Development Department considers a side yard width .of 1.5 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate · development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of.the OffiCial Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this. variance apply only to the proposed detached dwelling that wiil be revised to reflect the 1.5' metre setback, as generally outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. ·2. That the. applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July 12, 2018, or this decision shall become ·null and void. 20 Report PICA 50/17 July 12,2017. Comment ·Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential -Low Density Area" within the Dunbarton . Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036 -"R3" -Third Density Residential Zone Appropriateness of the Application Side Yard Width Variance . Page 2 • the intent of a minimum side yard width is to provide an appropriate separation distance between structures on abutting properties in order to ensure. compatibility with the existing nei-ghbourhood, provide appropriate p>edestrian access between dwellings, and to accommodate grading, drainage and residential services such as air conditioning units and utility meters . • ·the applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit minimum side yard widths of 1.2 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling; whereas the by-law requires minimum side yard widths of 1.8 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling • the reduced side yard width of 1.2 .metres is proposed for both sides of the proposed dwelling . • the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines contains provisions for development along Fairport Road south of the Dunbarton Creek Ravin~ that support maintaining larger lot depths and larger building setbacks (a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres. is supported) · • the subject property has a large lot depth of approximately 111.0 metres and is sited on the west side of Fairport Road south of the Dunbarton Creek Ravine • a number of previous variances have been approVed along Fairport Road .to permit reduced side yard widths of 1.5 metres • it is staff's opinion that the requested var,iance of a minimum side yard width of ·1.2 metres on both sides does not meet the intent of the City's Dunbarton . Neighbourhood Development Guidelines and is not consisten-t with. the character of the neighbourhood · • it is staff's opinion that the subject property can accommodate the proposed d~tache·d dwelling with minimum side yard widths of 1.5 metres, in keeping with the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines and the character of the neighbourhood Staff are of the opinion that the subject variance is a major variance, is not considered to be desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and is not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Refusal of the proposed variance. Report PICA 50/17 21 July 12, 2017 Page 3 Should the Committee see merit in the application, staff recommends that the applicant · maintain minimum side yard widths of 1.5 metres; where a garage is ~rected as part of the. detached dwelling. Input From Other Sources · Engineering Services Date of report: July 5, 2017 Comments prepared by: Rory McNeil Planner I RM:Id J:\Documents\Developmenl\D-370012017\PCA SQ-17\Report\PCA SQ-17 Report.docx Attachments · • no comments on the application .fJ4¥1 Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review ------------- -Cdt;c/- PJCKERJNG City Development Department STROUDS LANE I r--~,_I I I II r--- II w II > rc z w 0 0 0:: (fJ w w 1-0:: ~ 0 I z ::2 I w w 0 0 _r 0:: ~ <( --~ (fJ z $ - - 1----r---- I JECT-\ \. E~8 'V'. ~G ) / :///11 II WELRUS STREET Location Ma File: PICA 50/17 Applicant:P. Cummins t---------fOI-------t-1 t------~~~ ~~-----~~ 0::1------1 1--------1$ t---------+--1 . w f------'T---1 t--------lrJ 1--------~~ ~ 1--------<k.J~-----JO.f------'--.-1 1-------~-~--------l~f--'---t--1 (1796 Fairport Road) Date: Jun. 02, 2017 SCALE: 1:5,000 THIS IS NOT A PlAN OF SURVEY. PN-RU ,;---·-·---··---------iT\·--,-s--. _i ___ rn_=======----~~~~~----~-----.==------__ -_-.:;,. I , to permit a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling ' I ~ ~·~;'~--..... __ L_ _ _ __ [_~-----~-----~..---:: I I I f, 'Z 11i ' ,.j I' 1 l I ~-~--·--~·~·····----·----I:Z. J m ----.,-------~ I .jl I 'I ! I ! ; I i ; tl' : I ! f w 00 o0 0S ;::::D r-;;z D ''--' n r· .__. Vv.IL !1-3v:- ! . S ---· \l;L _________ _ Submitted Plan i I ! I I I I i I I ! I I I I I € \f) :t I ! ' ' i ) . \I i ! ; j I I I 23 ~~ -Of;j{)f- P1CKER1NG r---------------------------~--------------------~ ' FILE No: P/CA 50/17 City Development Department APPLICANT: P. Cummins PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 820 Part Lot 5 Now 40R25432 Part 2 (1796 Fairport Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: June 26, 2017 24 . u ~ "l;-l>-<:=r-~~0 I --r,,bou~ .P.....,...._ I ' I' s . t.f" . ~:~r ~~ -~ . ' ' ~~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~--~~~~ ·: ~ : -~ J ~~FL<»,, ,lbG;~~-.. , t::====~ .. ~ti ~:;;:,_: _·: ... ~~~~;: ~ L"- ~~~ ~ELIJ') ~zto_ · ·. \1 -~ "'{"/~o.J~· :.....=::::::--== :;:::::::::::;:~ . . . . • ...,.;.... -~~~­ PlCKERlNG City Development Department s9uJiLLE?brrlEl EVATI~ Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 50/17 APPLIC~NT: P. Cummins PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 820 Part Lot 5 Now 40R25432 Part 2 (1796 Fairport Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: June 26, 2017 25 Report to -C~~~­ P_l(K·ERJNG Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 51117 · · · Date: July 12,2011 From: Subject: · Application Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 51117 K. Storey & R. Kay 5049 Brock Road The ·applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640106: • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 2·2 percent; whereas the by-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 20 percent • to permit an accessory building with a maximum height of 4.2 metres ·in a residential zone; whereas the by-law requires that no accessory building shall exceed a height of 3.5 metres in any residential zone • to recognize a minimum lot area of 1180.3 square metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 1390.0 square r:netres • to recognize a minimum front yard depth of 0.0 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard depth of 9.0 metres • to recognize a minimum exterior side yard depth of 0.0 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard depth of 4.5 metres The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain building permits to construct an addition to the existing detached dwelling and to construct an accessory building (detached gar~ge). Recommendation The City" Development Department considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Offici a.!' Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the followi,ng conditions: ' 1. That these variances· apply only to the detached dwelling and accessory building (detached garage), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July 12, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. · 26 Report PICA 51/17 Background . . . July 12, 2017 Page 2 The subject lands are currently used for residential purposes and supports two detached ·dwellings and an accessory structure. The existing detached dwelling fronting onto Brock Road appears to have been constructed in the late 1800s and prior to Zoning By-law 3037 coming into effect. The dwelling is not recognized in the.Ciaremont Buildings of Historical and Archit~ctural Importance listing. The addition is proposed to extend the dwelling to the north ' and add a second storey to the east half of the existing building. The detached dwelling and accessory structure located on the east portion of the property do not appear to have any historical or architectural significance, and are proposed to be 9emolished. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Rural Settlements -Oak Ridges Moraine Rural Hamlets" within the Hamlet of Claremont ' Zoning By-law 3037, as amen·ded by By-law 6640/06-"ORM-R5" . ..:... Oak Ridges Moraine- Hamlet Residential Five Zone Appropriateness of the Application Lot Coverage Variance • the intent of the maximum lot coverage provision is to ensure that the size, scale and · ·massing of a dwelling, and accessory buildings is approp'riate for the lot size and to ensure an adequate amount of outdoor amenity space remains uncovered by buildings • the applicant has requested a variance to increase the maximum lot coverage from 20 percent to 22 percent • the increase in lot coverage will provide for the appropriate development of the land as the size and massing of the proposed dwelling will be in keeping with the character of · the surrounding neighbourhood . • the proposed development will maintain a sufficient amount of outdoor amenity area. that will remain uncovered and unobstructed on the lot • the requested variance to increase the maximum lot coverage by two percent is minor in nature Accessory Building Height Variance • the intent of the maximum accessory building height of 3.5 metres in a residential zone is to minimize the visual impact that these structures may have on abutting properties and on the streetscape, and to further ensure that accessory buildings do not become the dominant buildings on residential properties Report PICA 51/17 July 12, 201-f7 Page 3 • the proposed height of 4.2 metres for the accessory structure is an increase of _0. 7 ofa metre from the zoning by-law requirements of 3.5 metres · . • the proposed structure will have minimal impact on abutting properties as it will be · located in the northeast corner' of the property, abutting the rear yard and accessory structures of the property to the north, and abutting the side yard of the Bell facility to the east · Lot Area, Front Yard Depth, and Exterior Side Yard Depth Variances • the general intent of p'erformance standards in a zoning by-law is to ensure that individual properties maintain appropriate lot sizes, building height and massing and building setbacks that can appropriately site a dwelling and is complimentary with the character of the surrounding neighbourhood . • the property currently contains two detached dwellings;· whereas the zoning by-law only permits one dwelling per lot · · • the existing dwelling fronting onto Brock Road, appears to have been constructed in its current location in. the late 1800s; prior to Zoning By-law 3037 coming into effect • the applicant is proposing to demolish the dwelling to the east and .build an addition· onto the dwelling fronting onto Brock Road • the applicant is requesting variances to recognize the existing. lot area, existing front yard depth and existing exterior side yard depth, in order tp construct a second storey aQdition on top of the east half of the existing dwelling, and an ac;idition extending the dwelling to the north . • the proposed addition is intended for residential purposes and the demolition of the dwelling to the east will bring the property more into conformity with the "ORM-R5" zone • the existing detached dwelling with the· proposed addition is in keeping with the residential character of the neighbourhood Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintain the purpose and .intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. · Input from Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: July 6, 2017 ~ Rory McNeil . Planner I RM:Id J~DoctJments\DevelopmenfiD-3700\2017\PCA 51-17\Report\PCA 51-17 Report.docx . Attachments • no comments on the application .P1!1! . Deborah Wyhe, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Developm_ent Review · --.--~of­ PJCKERJNG City Development Department 1 Location Ma - v I I ANF!::: IRFFl -j 11 -~ 1----'----'---'---1 J SUBJECT1I PROPERTY 11--------1 I I ~~----~~~~~, -~----~lli~---~~--~ ~ ~~--------~ 1-1:----~ en -z~--------~ - L-L----t--~,-------1~ (9 !---- I-- - Z~----------1 / > j~ :;J J File: PICA 51/17 Date: Jun. 22, 2017 SCALE: 1:5,000 PN-RU THIS IS NOT A PlAN OF SURVEY. to recognize a minimum . front yard depth of 0.0 metres to recognize a minimum exterior side yard depth of 0.0 metres 1ii C1) ... +-' CJ) .c a. C1) t/) 0 .., -Cdt;~I­ PICKERING City Development Department Brock Road 29. 2.0m. to recognize a minimum lot area of 1180.3 square metres ±25'-0" to permit a maximum .....-----JIIIot coverage of 22 percent · ±13'-0" 1.2 m Submitt~d Plan FILE No: P/CA 51/17 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Part Lot 10 Plan 12 (5049 Brock Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. . DATE: June21, 2017 30 !FRONT ELEVA:rtoN FROM BROCK ROAD 1' --'----~ {)I . PlCKERlNG City Development Department to permit an accessory builc;ling with a maximum height of 4.2 metres in residential zone 16' 0" X 7' 0" OVERHEAD DOOR FLUSH, 4 f' ANEL, STEEL . 4.2m .¥-~-,-.------24' ---------,tt NORTH Submitted Plan . FILE No: P/CA 51/17 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Part Lot 10 Plan 12 · (5049 Brock Road) DATE: June21, 2017 FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. . · 31 Report to Committee of Adjustment -Application Numbers: PICA 52117, PICA 53117 & PICA 54117 c' From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review · Subject: . · Committee of Adjustment Applications: · PICA 52117, PICA 53/17 & PICA 54117 M. Casey 1307 Commerce Street Applications Date: July 12, 2017 PICA 52117 (Proposed Lot 1 ), PICA 53i17 (Proposed Lot 2} & PICA 54117 (Proposed Lot 3} The applicant reques~s relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended: "' to permit a minimum lot frontage of 12.0 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres • to permit a minimum lot area of 324 square metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 460 square metres • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 48 percent, whereas the by-law requires a maxim.um lot coverage of 33 percent • to permit a minimum side yard setback of 1.2 metres, whereas. the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres · • to permit a minimum front yard setback of 4.5 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 7.5 metres • to permit a covered.platform to project a maximum of 1.8 metres into the required front yard, whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or pfatforms not exc~eding 1.0 metre in height to project a maximum of 1·.5 metres into the required front yard · The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to facilitate the creation of a total of three·lots through th~ Region of Durham Land Division Com·mittee, and obtain building permit~ for the construction of three detached dwellings. · Recomm~ndation The City Development Department considers a minimum frontage of 12.0 metres, a minimum lot area of 324 square metres, a maximum lot coverage of 48 percent, a minimum side yard ·setback of 1.2 metres, a minimum .front yard setback of 4.5 metres, and a maximum covered platform projection of 1.8 metres to be major variances that are not considered to be desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and :the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Refusal of the. proposed variances~ · 32 Report PICA 52/17, PICA 53117 & PICA 54/17 July 12, 2017 Page 2 Backgro·und Following the finalization of the Notice of Public Hearing, which was mailed on June 28, 2017, City staff identified an additional variance is required to facilitate the applicant's proposal. A variance is required to permit a minimum lot area of 324 square metres, whereas the by-law requires a m_inimum lot area of 460 square metres. · · Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan ;_ "Urban Residential Areas -Low Density Areas" within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood . · Zoning By-law 2511 -"R4"-Fourth Density Residential Zone Appropriateness of the Application Requested Variances for Proposed Lots 1, 2 & 3 (PICA 52/17, PICA 53117 & PICA 54117, respectively) • the applicant has request~d variances to reduce the minimu~ lot frontage requirement from 15.0 metres to 12.0 metres and reduce the minimum lot area requirement from 460 square metres to 324 square metres in order to facilitate the creation of a total of three lots (proposed Lots 1, 2 & 3) for· detached dwell,ings fronting onto Commerce Street • the applicant has also requested additional variances to reduce the minimum required side yard setback from 1.5 metres to 1.2 metres, reduce the minimum front yard setback from 7.5 metres to 4.5 metres, increase the maximum lot coverage from 33 percent to 48 percent, and permit a covered platform.to project a maximum of1.8 metres into the required front yard in·-order to con-struct new detached dw~llings on three newly created lots ·(see Submitted Plan, Attachment #2) • ·surrounding the subject property along Commerce Street,.Broadvi.ew Street and the southerly east-west portion ofAnnland Street between Liverpool Road and Annland Street is an established neighbhourhood of older homes predominately consisting of bungalows and one-and-a-half storey dwellings · • the existing lotting fabric and established building setbacks within the area generally consists of wide lots, deep front yard depths, wide· side yard widths, lower building heights and ample open space • existing lots containing detached dwellings within the immediate neighbourhood have lot frontages ranging between 15.0 metres and 30.0 metres (see Frontage Map, · Attachment #3) • existing lots within the immediate area meet the minimum required lot area of 460 squ·are metr~ · · Report PICA 52117, PICA 53117 & PICA 54117 July 12, 201133 Page. 3 • Section 13.1 O(c) of the Official Plan states that where new development is proposed within an existing neighbourhood or an established area, City Council shall encourage designs that reinforce and complement existin.g built patterns such as form, massing·, height proportion, position relative to the street, and building area to site area ratios • the general intent of performance standards in a zoning by-law is to-regulate development in order to ensure compatibility with the patt~rn of development in the area and to maintain the character of the neighbourho.od . • the proposed minimum lot frontage of 12.0 metres and minimum lot area of 324 square. metres will result in three new lots that are significantly·sinaller than the established lots within the immediate area, particularly along Commerce Street between Liverpool Road and Annland Street · •. the requested front yard setback.of 4.5 metres will result in the proposed dwellings to be sited considerably closer to the front lot line than existing dwellings along Commerce Street • the average front yard setbacks along Commerce Street between Liverpool Road and Annland Street are g·enerally bet~een 7.5 metres and 8.5 metres • the requested projection of 1.8 metres for a covered porch into the required front yard will further reduce the distance between the new dwellings and Commerce Street, and would facilitate t~e construction of a building approximately 2. 7 metres ·from the front lot line, whereas the current zoning by-law wo'uld permit a structure to be setback a minimum of 6.0 metres from the front lot line · • the requested variance to increase the maximum lot coverage to 48 percent represents a·' 15 percent increase from the maximum lot coverage of 33 percent, ahd is not considered minor in nature • the requested variances to reduce lot frontage and lot area will result in the creation of a · total of three new lots that will not maintain the established lotting pattern within the · immediate neighbourhood, • the requ~sted variances to reduce the front yard and sipe yard setbacks and increase. the permitted lot coverage will result in the development of significantly sized dwellings on smaller lots that would not be consistent with the established character and pattern of development and will not reinforce or complement the existing quilt form along Commerce Street • the requested variances are considered not to be. minor in nature, are not desirable for the appropriate development of the lands and do not meet the general intent and purpose of Official Plan an.d the Zoning By-law · ' · 34· Report PICA 52117, PICA 53117 & PICA 54/17 July 12, 2017 Page4 Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • no comments on the application Date of report: July 6, 2017 fM4i Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review CM:Id J:\Documents\Development\D-370012017\PCA 52-17 to PCA 54-17\Repart\PCA 52-17ta PCA 54-17 Repart.doc Attachm·ents -. (14;o/- PJCKERJNG City Development Department Attachment#....-...../ _ Location Ma File: PICA 52117, PICA 53117, & PIGA 54117 (1307 Commerce Street) Date: Jun. 19, 2017 ~rr:h~::e~~d~~~~~cr~):o~;~ee~~~~~c~u~l~~t(J~f6~a':a~~e=!::e~~::~~~~::O::~~~~~~~~~:!%:d.~atura Resources. SCAlE: 1:5,000 PN-RU ~ Teranel Enterprises Inc. and lb !iUpplicrs al rights reserved.; C Munlc:lpal Property Assessment CorporaUon and lts suppners aU rights reserved.; THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. Lots 1, 2 & 3: to permit a maximum lot coverage of 48 oercent Lots 1, 2 & 3: to permit~ covered platform to project 1.8 metres into the required front yard r I i -, : i . J ~) .... ~., ' [\Lit} l 1-"1)"1\ ):(· 1 ; j l II t_o\-a...l 'i . P/CA53/17 P/CA52/17 ~ ~ i! li J...? 1\ /'~ ,\ J; P/CA 54/1.7 ./i I Lots 1, 2 & 3: to permit a minimum lot area of 323 square metres I ! Lots 1, 2 & 3: to permit a minimum side yard . ·1 L,;.;se;.:tb;.;a;.:c;;.;.k.;o.;..f 1.:.;.2;:..:.:.m.:.:e;.::.tr,;.;es~__. I 1 I . . i 1 I I ;'['ff .. ~ j I I i ' i l·' · t Lots 1, 2 & 3: to permit a I r..=r-=-------.:;. I minimum lot frontage of f._& --r~ -~ •1 ?/~.;:!$---,...'J-·\-1! ~ ~12.om~tres ·~ r~. , i· 4.$ /'{\ ' tV\ 11 4_ :S: ~: /;_., ~~t\,· I · ~ {c.!! u •. ~ Y"/. ~~. _ ~. . 1-N) .Ji ·. r 3 i ~. 11 Lots 1, 2·& 3: to permit a minimum front yard setback of 4.5 metres -~o~­ P1CKER1NG City Development Depa~ment_ _L 12.0 m 12.0 m Submitted Plan FILE No: PICA 92/17, PICA 53/17 & P/CA 54/17 APPLICANT: M. Casey PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 0 & Part Lot 11, Plan 407 _ (1307 Commerce Street) , FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CllY OF PICKERING CllY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. 12.0 m · / DATE: June 20, 20~7 2 . 1230 F M1 K4 1298 1299 R4 660 1394 11 712 1.392 712 1390 1388 '"' .... GULL CROSSING KIWI 709 710 1386MO H13 -·-..: 1350 1384 • -~~~- \ .. 1382 1376 374 37 1370136 1366 1364 36213601358135 1354 52-17 13~~ HEWSON DRIVE 708 ~--1•3-BO~~.---~--~~~~~ .. ------~.-.. ~--~~--~~~----~--~~ C1 715 709 .-.A .t.t 1 ... - 701 C1 695 ...... ()1 3 ...... ()1 3 "' 0 3 689 685 675 6~7 663 R4 131o SUBJECT PROPERTY. 1318 18m COMMERCE STREET 26m 18m 23m 25m 1303 1311 1315 1319 K.4 1302 1304 1306 1308 1310 1312 1314 1316 1!i m 1!i m 1!i m. 1!i m 1!i m 1fi I'M 1fi m 706 704 1320 . 1322 1324 I 1326 1328 18m f8 It! . 18m 18m 18m 26m 15m 1!:! m 1!:lm 1321 1325 1327 1329 I • -r 1320 1324 1326 1328. 25m 15m 18m . BROADVIEW STREET I" "• 15m 15m 15m 15m 15m 16m 15m m 15m 17m 18m 1305 1307 1309 1311 1313 1315 1317 1319 1321 1323. 1327 634· 636 636 640 642 644 646 648 650 652 . 654 656 656 660 662 706 702 , ....... I •• •• ' 700 664 682 . ..... " ... ...... 680 678 66~ 664 I 0 ~~ z .z <t Ctttj (Jtf .• P1CKER1NG City Development Department Frontage Map File:· PICA 52/17, P/CA53/17 & P/CA54/17 Applicant:M·. Casey Property Description: Part Lot 11, 0 Lot 10 Plan 407. Add res$: 1307 Commerce St Date: Jul. 05, 2017 SCALE: 1:1,000. THIS IS NOTA PLAN OF SURVEY. ©The CorporaUon of the Cily ~f Pickering Produced (In part) under license from:© Queens Printer. Ontario Ministry ·of Natural R~sources. All rights reseNe.d.;©. Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada, Department Df ~atural Resources. All rights reserved.; © Teranet Enterprises Inc. and Its suppliers all rights reserved.;© Municipal Property Assessment CorporaUon and Us suppliers all rights reserv~d.; 0 12.5 25 50 Metres I I I I I I I I I - ® ~ w. -ru . 0 E: '::1" 8· 3 CD 38 . . Cfi:t of----- _PlCKERlNG From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 59117 Date: August2, 2017 Principal Planner-Development Review Subject: . Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 59/17 S. Mikhail 1815 Fairport Road, Unit 10 Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 7284/13 to permit an uncovered deck and steps not exceeding 3.0 metres in height above established grade, to encroach a maximum of 4.1 metres into the required rear yprd, where the lot abuts the OS-HL zone; whereas the by-law requires uncovered decks, platforms or steps not exceeding 3.0 metres in height above established grade, to encroach a maximum of 3.0 metres into the required rear yard; for lots abutting the OS-HL zone. The applicant requests approval.of this minor v.ariance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct a deck and associated steps in the rear yard. Recommendation The City Development Department co_nsiders the subject variance to be minor in nature, . desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: · 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed uncovered deck and steps, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by August 2, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law · Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential -Low Density Areas" within the Dunbarton Neighbourhood. Zoning By-law 3036, as 'amended by By-law 7284113 -"S3-13" R~port PICA ·59/17 Appropriateness of the Application August 2, 2017 39 Page 2 Uncovered Deck and Steps Projecting into the Required Rear Yard . . • the intent of this provision is to ensure an adequate amenity space is provided within the rear yard, appropriate setbacks are provided to protect the privacy of abutting property . owners, and allow appropriate access for maintenance, lot grading and drainage • the by-law permits uncovered decks and steps not exceeding 3.0 metres in height above grade to project a maximum of 3.0 metres into the required rear yard, where the lot abuts the OS-HL zone · • the existing deck has a .depth of approximately 2.8 metres, with the proposed stairs to have a depth of approximately 1.5 metres; for a total depth of 4.3 metres • the existing dwelling has a rear yard depth of 7.7 metres; whereas the by-law requires a r rear yard depth of 7.5 metres • the deck and proposed steps will project a total of 4.1 metres into the required rear yard, and will have a height of less than 3.0 metres above grade • without the proposed steps, the deck would conforms to the requirements of the zoning by-law • the property backs onto the Dunbarton Creek Ravine, zoned·OS-HL and owned by the City of Pickering; no future development is permitted within the OS-HL zone • each unit of the condominium development at 1815 Fairport Road that backs onto the OS-HL zone has a similar deck projection into the rear yard, with several of the units having associated steps · • there does not appear to be any. adverse impacts on adjacent neighbours due to the proposed deck and associated steps • the deck and proposed steps will provide for 'additional outdoor amenity area and will maintain an adequate amount of soft landscaped-area in the rear yard • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Engineering Services · Date of report: July 26, 2017 Comments prepared by: .~ Rory McNeil Planner I RM:DW:Id J:\Documanls\Developmenl\D-3700\2017\PCA 59-17\Report\PCA 59-17 Report.doc Attachments · • no comments on the application Deborah Wylie, MGIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review . \ r----- r----- - - - -- I-- I-- - - ___:__ - - - - - I ~\ BONITAAVENUE =~~~~~~~~~=l~tJ~~ ~~~)I \ = ~ - ) l___J ru~== ~ r------0 1------f-~---,--,-T' -----f !------; ·-0 r-----r-----1 1--r--,----,---1· r-----r--~ ~ . -., 1---z t-----1 hl -o---------1 r-----(.) .----,..----1 . -) }---;..J '-- r"""-r-1--,_ 1--1--r-- 1--r--r--~--r---1= \...-...:......I...-J---l.-.J----1-.I...{_j.....L.....r--'----":-..J -( '---it 1---+----1 STROUDS LANE ~ r-- ---) ) 'r-- -~---1-e--r- -r--Zr---1= -Wr----f----, 1--(.) r--r--(J) '---r-~ \ ~J--------1 0 -r--~ '---f-~ -<C -~o-1= 1 1 t-------1~ =r--~ -~ r--------1 w$ r---'---Ci5 -r- t--------'---L-J---1 r---'---I -~ 1-----f---t------1~ r---= ~ _:_f=. f-------1([· r---I-t::: 1-----7----l a. r----,-l <( r--_ -f= 1------'l--J r----c__ f r----1--f= ' I . ) 1/ " 1-----+----1 ~ LW I+--; ----1 \ · -l==t--r---'-__.---'--_..J...._-;~ """ ~ \ SUBJECT v._.. L:_=t_=:::l-L---~-~o:::~ ~~ ~·') PROPERTY-~w~ -} '.· I Zf--=:''""' - '\ / r , ~~ ......._r==-=-GOLDENRIDGE ROAD -c.._/ t~ . ......__ . . / /1'--r-/~"T"""T""'T""T""T"'"'\ ( ,,..___,' \ . ----~ I \ ~ WELRUS STREET \ W v-~ \ D f---!~ r-= \ ~ 1-----l---\\ (I) o I I r--- _w ~ ;::= t .. l----\ ~ \---0 -J r~ ~DYBR: DRI ..... VE_.__...___-r(__f----1 :R1:1U,_S-H:TO:N:R:O,_,A-\~c4 hr--~ 3 J ~ )F=I i~ ~ \ 1<'i I Y.? 3 1 c-~------~ ~ ~ t-L---L-t;TE_,__,__s1\\~·. ·~-----~i__f l ~ ~ ~--== rr\J) L...------'L-------1 l" ~ -DUNBARTON ROAD City Development Department I Location Map File: PICA 59/17 Applicant:S. Mikhail Property Description:Pian 40M2519 Part Block 1 40R28523 Part 7 (1815 Fairport Road, Unit 10 Date: Jul. 11,2017 ~l~geh~ar:e~~od~:~~:r ~~:!;~~e~~~::;~~(~r~:k~~~~::~~~~:,=:~~~e~=~~~~.~~~~t~~~::~.~atural Resources. SCALE: 1 :5 'OOQ I @ Teranel En!er rises Inc. and Us suppners all tl h!s reserved.:© Municipal Property Assessment Corpoiation and Its supp!lers all r!Qh!s reserved.; THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. P N-R U to permit an uncovere~-deck and steps not exceeding 3'.0 metres in height above established grade, to encroach .a maximum of 4.1 metre~ into the required rear yard, where the lot abuts the OS-HL zone I 1-!o::-6.1 I :l -~-·-: I 1--6.2 l --I I . -. 30.7 p I 9 : ..J:o. . 0'1 C1 I 01 01 )> ~ ....... ;o J Cb !' )> .,, C1 I ·t ~:o fTI I ' '"0 I -~ ::::0 ro _., : -u· "\.. I 0 N _____ _:_ _ _] 0 ~I \ i --i r:r: OJ ~ 3.2 I ....., ... . ~-', t -u ~ , r~ ~ '-J 0 I 0 -y"\.0 ;:o I A)" ·i:-1 -.. · uired Rear p:l Cl. 0 3 .01'Y1_ -· I.... ;( ~ ·· .· fard~("~~) ·-I I ro ~ 3.2 ~ ·f. 4.1m' •· 3:4111 LL _. ~~ _. - N N I. i ~-'HI J ,J ". .. 1 I I I f--6.7 ' ":t,p ~ v ~-·. -. • 7' Submitted Plan ~6~ FILE No: PICA 59/17 PlCKERlNG . APPLICANT: S. Mikhail City Development PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 40M2519 Part Block 1 40R28523 Part 7 (1815 Fairport Road, Unit 10) Department DATE: July 18, 201f:: FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. · 42 __ c~ ()1-- PlCKERlNG From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Report to Commit~ee of Adjustment 'Application Number: PICA 60117 Date: August 2, 2017 r Principal Planner-Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 60117 T. & M. Kuteyi 1815 Fairport Road,· Unit 4 Application · The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 7284113 to permit an uncovered deck and steps not exceeding 3.0 metres in height above established grade, to encroach a maximum of 4.8 metres into the required rear yard, where the lot abuts· the OS-HL zone; whereas the by-law requires uncovered clecks, platforms or steps not exceeding 3.0 metres in height above established grade, to encroach a maximum of 3.0 metres into the required rear yard, for lots abutting the OS-HL zone. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance e3pplication in order to obtaln a building permit to construct a deck and associated steps in the rear yard. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the s.ubject variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval bf the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: ( ' 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed uncovered deck and steps, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the construCtion by AugL,!st 2, 2018, or this · decision shall become null and void. Background The subject deck and steps were constructed prior to the applicant applying for a building permit, and as such already exists on the property. A building permit is needed for the construction to ensure that the deck and steps meet the requirements of the Ontario Building Code. The applicant is add.it.ionally required to obtain a minor variance prior to the issuan~e of the building permit, as the construction does not conform to the requirements of the zoning by-law. Report PICA 60/17 Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law August 2, 2017 43 · Page 2 Pickering Official Plan-"Urban Residential -Low Density Areas" within the Dunbarton Neighbourhood. Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 7284/13.,... "83-13" Appropriateness of the·Application , Uncovered Deck and Steps Projecting into the Required Rear Yard • the intent of thi's provision is to ensure an adequate amenity space is provided within the rear yard, appropriate setbacks are provided to protect the privacy of abutting property owners, and allow appropriate access for maintenance, lot grading and drainage • the by-law permits uncovered decks and steps not exceeding 3.0 metres in height above grade to project a maximum of 3.0 metres into-the required rear yard, where the lot abuts the OS-HL zone • the de9k has a depth of approximately 2. 7 metres, with the stairs having a depth of approximately 2.3 metres; for a total depth of 5.0 m·etres • the existing dwelling has a_ rear yard depth of 7.7 metres; whereas the by-law requires a rear yard depth of 7.5 metres • the deck and steps project a total of 4.8 metres into the required rear yard, and have a height of less than 3.0 metres above grade • . without the steps, the deck conforms to the requfrements of the zoning by-law • the property backs onto the Dunbarton Creek Raviner zoned QS-HL and owned by the City of Pickering; no future development is permitted within the OS-HL zone · .• each unit of the condominium development at 1815 Fairport Road that backs onto the OS-HL zone has a similar deck projection into the rear yard, with several of the units having associated steps • the deck overlooks the rear yard of the property to the north (1825 Brock Road), however it is only the steps that do not conform with the requirements of the zoning by-law· • the steps do not appear to ·create any adverse privacy impact on adjacent neighbours • the deck and· steps provide for additional outdoor amenity area and maintain an · adequate amount of soft l_andscaped area in the rear yard • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By.;law Input From Other Sour.ces Engineering Services • no comments on the application 44 Report PICA 60/17 Date of report: July 26, 2017 Comments prepared by: y~ Rory McNeil Planner I RM:DW:Id J:\Documenls\Developmeni\D-3700\2017\PCA 60-17\Report\PCA 60-17 Report.doc Attachments Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP ~ugust 2, 2017 Page 3 Principal Planner-Development Review I r--~I I - ~ ~I w > z 0:: w 0 0 0:: en w w ~ 0:: ~ 0 _I z 2 w w 0 0 0:: <( <( I r---CJ en z $ - 1---;-- ___j \~ I ~~ ~ ) / '/ II .WELRUS STREET -Oip~t-· P1CKER1NG City Development Department I II r--- ~G II rw 99.09 3W 97.78 en -I m:::O~ ~m 0 "'m -a Submitted Plan \ I FILE No: P/CA 60/17 LBm WOOD P VA FENCE J0.17 91. .. """'1.72 98.94;;; APPLICANT: T. & M. Kuteyi 1a2" iS Si~~:::j !!!! "'"':8"' ~~~~ ., to permit an uncover~d/deck and steps not exceeding 3:0 metres in height above established grade, to encroach a maximum of 4.8 metre into the required rear yard, where the lot abuts the OS-HL zone City Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Pl~:m 40M2519 Part Block 1 40R28523 Part 1 (1815 Fairport Road, Unit 4) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: July 18, 2017 47 Report to -C~o~­ PJCKERlNG Committee of Adjustment From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review Application Number: PICA 61/17 Date: August 2, 2017 Subject: Committee of Adjustment Applicatiqn P/CA·61/17 · P. & J. Kukic 1815 Fairport Road, Unif8 · Application ·The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 7284/13 to permit an u_ncovered deck and steps not exceeding 3.0 metres in height above established grad~, to encroach a maximum of 5.0 metres into the required rear yard,where the lot abuts the OS-HL zone; whereas the by-law requires uncovered decks, platforms or steps not exceeding 3.0 metres in height above established grade, to encroach a maximum of 3.0 metres into ~he required rear yard, for lots abutting the OS-HL zone. · The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct a deck and associated steps in the rear yard. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the subject variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the .land, and i'n keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: · 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed uncovered deck and steps, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. . That the applicant obtain a building permit for the construction by August 2, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. · Backgroun·d The subject deck and steps were constructed prior to the applicant applying for a building permit, and as such already exists on the property. A building permit is needed for the construction to ensure that the deck and steps meet the requirements of the Ontario Building Code. The applicant is additionally required to obtain a minor variance prior to the issuance of the building permit, as the construction does not conform to the requirements of the zoning by-law. I 48 Report PICA 61/17 Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law August2,2017 Page 2 Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential -Low Density Areas" within the Dunbarton Neighbourhood. Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 7284/13-"83-13" Appropriateness of the Ap_plication • the intent of this provision is to ensure an adequat~ amenity space is provided within the rear yard, appropriate setbacks are provided to protect the privacy of abutting property owners, and allow appropriate access for maintenance, lot grading and drainage • the by-law permits uncovered decks and steps not exceeding 3.0 metres in height above grade to· prqject a maximum of 3.0 metres into the required rear yard, where the lot abuts the OS-HL zone • the deck has a depth of approximately 2.7 metres, with the stairs having a depth of approximately 2.3 metres; for a total depth of 5.0 metres • the existing dwelling has a rear yard depth of 7.5 metres, as required in the by-law • the deck and steps project a total·of 5.0 metres into the required rear yard, and have a height of less than 3.0 metres above grade • · without the steps, the deck conforms to the requirements of the zoning·by-law • ~he property backs onto the Dunbarton Creek Ravine, zoned OS-HL and owned by the City of Pickering; n<;> future development is permitted within the OS-HL ~one · • each unit of the condominium development at 1815 Fairport Road that backs onto the OS-HL zone has a similar deck projection into the rear yard, with several of the units having associated steps · • there does not appear to be any adverse impacts on adjacent neighbours due to the deck and associated steps · • the deck and steps provide for additional outdoor amenity area and maintain an · adequate amount of soft landscaped area in the rear yard · . • · the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the ·land, and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • no comr:nents on the application Report PICA 61/17 Date of report: July 26, 2017 · Comments prepared by: ~~ Rory McNeil Planner I RM:DW:Id J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2017\PCA 61-17\Report\PCA 61-17 Report.doc Attachments August 2, 2017 49 Page3 Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review )fil-t---r-.........-====r==r-8rv-OY.1'A1GE1~-A1V~1N'~:-E~-,------r-~~-=--=--f=:_~:r~--,R=::::r--lll-,-,--l,-,l----r----r-----;/r-:;;::;"""'"1r-\"7"'-v;"""'"'JI .. ~ 1----t--1~ J I TTl ,-----,-___,___;;B~ONITAAVENUE \. "'-< .---1-----'--!-----2: h~ I . r-~-~--~m~------+--,--~ r-~. 1---:r: \ I I f--?; I--1----'-----l J L..____J .~r-3: 1---'----'-r---L------J I--f--0 -1------f-------l ~ '-----'----; '-------8 .--------,...~-----1 ) ~ 1----:> '-----1-- -~cf­ P1CKER1NG City Development Department STROUDS LANE Location Map 1----:> '1-----1 1-----l----1 z r---z 1---'------ow I--,____of--, -----i \-----0 ·~------r-------1 1-----l----1 ~ -I--~ ~ ~ 1--+--------l l-------1f----l ~ -~ ~ f---1-------:--f-------l 0 -1--- ----1.\ \---1-----f-------l ~ -~ I-- I ,----Ci5 -I--I--== r_ 1-----l----1 ~ =~----'----'~'_j----------1 0 uJ _I--I--(§ :r: -'----1---,J---------,1~ 1------------1 ~ -~ 1--- 1 I r-----------1 ~ --c--t---------L--'--+--l ---t-----1-----ir------------1~ I ~ = = ~ IL___ ~-= t-----"-t--11-----------1 ~ I----,--- 1---~------{f,----(------------t I I---- I .......__-r--) ~----~-/~·~~~~ '"'rr----------1 1/ \ File: PICA 61/17 Applicant:P. & J. Kukic Property Description: Plan 40M2519 Part Block 1 40R28523 Part 5 (1815 Fairport Road, Unit 8) Date: Jul. ·11, 2017 ~~~T~:h~0r~:::d~;~ :r ~~e0:t;i~~e~~~:n~~~~~~(~r ~a~a~:~;:;::ee~~~:,:~~e~:~~~~:~.~~~:~~~~:!%~~.~atural Resources. S GALE: 1 :51 OQQ ~ Teranet Enter rises Inc. and Its suppners an rights reserved.:@ Municipal Property Assessment Corpor"aticn and l!s suppliers a!l rl his reserved.: THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY P N-R U . I -~D~­ PlCKERlNG City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: PICA 61/17 APPLICANT: P. & J. Kukic to permit an uncovered deck arid steps not exceeding 3.0 metres in. height above established grade, to encroach a maximum of 5.0 metre into the required rear yard, where the lot abuts the OS-HL zone . '1/. . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 40M2519Part Block 1 40R28523 Parts· ·(1815 Fairport Road, Unit 8) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: July Hi, 201£!