Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDecember 21, 1964 M U N I C I PAL B U I 'L DIN G B ~ 0 UGH A'M A meeting of Pickering Township Council was beld on MONDAY. the TWE~T~- FIRST day of DECEMBER. 1964, at EIGRT o'clock'Pl m. PRESENT: C. W. Laycox. in the Chair Mrs. J. L. McPherson Harvey Spang Wm. G. Newman Donald Waring John Campbe 11 Hubert Wank L~ T. Johnston, Clerk The f6ìlowing CORRESPONDENCE was considered. la County Reýistrar advises he has had second thoughts and will not put a Reg~strar's Compiled Plan on Plan 3~6, East Woodlands, but a Land Titles Plan will be required for the 200 properties at a cost of $14,690.00 of which the Province will pay $3,672.50 leaving $5,508.75 for owners and $5,508.75 for Township. Clèrk and Registrar to reconsider and state facts of area, r 2. r 3. r ~. I I 5. I 6,. I I I 8. 9. I RESOLUTION NUMBER ~'5/6~ I MOVED by Mr. Campbell. seconded by Mr. Waring, that this a Fidelity Bond. through Zurich Insurance Company, for a $500.00 only, for R. J. Finnegan. I RESOLUTION NUMBER 446/64 MOVED by Mrs. McPherson, seconded by Mr. Spang. that whereas the Township Council has agreed to accept Service Road from Liverpool Road I to Fairport Road and Department of Highways of Ontario will not be in a position to make the transfer for several months; Metro To~onto and Region Conservation Authority ask that they be permitted to purchase the approximately 76 acres flats in West Rouge owned by the Township for $2.00, subject to conditions. See Resolution No. ~47/64. DevaI'tment of Highways of Ontario ask Township to snow plow and sand Service Road south of Highway ~Ol from Liverpool Road to Fairport Road, as Township has been doing for past feW years. and bill them loot. See Resolution No. ~4e/6~. advise they will Bond R. J, Finnegan for employees seem to be in Derriçk ~urtis of Claremont has been chosen as one of five Boy Scouts' i~ Canada to attend Jamboree in Australia leaving December 24, 1964. cost $1,600.00. The Scout Committee ask Council for a d on at i on . See Re sol uti on No. ~ 4 9 / 6 ~ . Rouge Hills Lions wish to invite Township Council to their meeting ot January 5th or February 2nd, whichever is most convenient to Council members. Agreed February 2nd would be satisfactory. 7. Mrs. Summers of North half Lot 18, Concession ~, objects to Consolidated Sand and Gravel Company operating all night in summer on Lot 16. Concession~. By-Law Enforcement Officer report~ Cliff ~ills (,Compan{' could not deliver truck in 30 days. supply~ng Internat~onal. Burrows Kiwanis of Bay Ridges express appreciation to Council for permittfng t~em to use water at flat rate, for rink in Fairport. Council accept maximum of CARRIED I I I con tin u e d. . . 2 Resolution No. ~46/6~ cont'd AND WHEREAS the Department of Highways of Ontario have asked that the Township maintain such road until taken over, for snow plowing and sanding and bill them 100%; BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that the Township Road Department maintain such Service Road for snow plowing and sanding until taken over by the Township, with Department of Highways of Ontario paying lOOt of such cost. CARRIED RESOLUTION NUMBER ~~7/64 MOVED by Mr. Wank, seconded by Mr. Campbell, that this Council agree to sell to the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority the approximately 76 acres in Rouge Hills flats, owned by the Township, for the sum of $2.00 under the terms set out by the Authority in their letter of May ~. 196~. CARRIED RESOLUTION NUMBER ~48/64 MOVED by Mrs. McPherson, seconded by Mr. Campbell, that application be made to the Department of Highways of Ontario for their approval for the Township Road Department to transfer certain funds of the 196~ Budget, By-Law 2906, as set out on the attached Schedule. CARRIED RESOLUTION NUMBER ~~9/6~ MOVED by Mr. Newman, seconded by Mr. Campbell, that a donation of $100.00 be made to 1st Boy Scout Troup of Claremont. CARRIED BY-LAW NUMBER 29~9 Mr. Waring, seconded by Mr. Newman~ moves for leave to introduce a By-Law of the Township of Pickering to repeal By-Law Number 2691 which created the office of Deputy Fire Chief, and that same now be read a first time. Mr. Waring. seconded by Mr. J. Campbell, moves that By-Law Number 29~9 to repeal By-Law Number 2691 which created the office of Deputy Fire Chief be now read a second time, and that Council go into Committee of the Wh 0 le the re on . The Commit~ee of the Whole arises and reports the By-Law as read. Mr. Waring, seconded by Mr. Campbell, moves that the report of the Committee of the Whole on By-Law No. 2949 be adopted, and that the said By-Law be now read a Third time and PASSED; that the Reeve and Clerk sign the same, and the Seal of the Corporation be affixed thereto. CARRIE D BY-LAW NUMBER 2950 (Two Readings) Mr.Spang, seconded by Mr. Newman, moves for leave to introduce a By-La~ of the Township of Pickering to amend By-Law 2603 and its appendices, and that same now be read a first time. Mr. Spang. seconded by Mrs. McPherson, moves that By-Law Number 2950 to amend By-Law 2603 and its appendices be now read a second time, and that Council go into Committee of the Whole thereon. As there were 72 appeals against Zoning By-Law 2790 and the Planning Board had reviewed such appeals and made a decision, they were submitted to Council for approval. Planning Board recommendationß were approved as follows: Items 1 to 29 - Moved by Mr. Newman, seconded by Mr. Wank - CARRIED Items 30 to 38 - Moved 'by Mr. Wank, seconded by Mr. Waring and CARRIED EXCEPT No. 38 which would permit the applicant to have his property zoned with "R" privileges. I !) I No. Name Location Present St¡J.tement of I~ Lot Con Zone Objection "\ 1. O. Stong 28 5 ' A' 2000 square foct house - reduce to -' feet and raise taxes. I~ 1150 square 2000 square foot house on ,existing 2. W. Shymchyshyn 11 3 ' A' I IO-acre.pàrcel. 3. A. M. Hansen 28 3 ' A r 2000 square foot house and 200 I feet frontage 4. J. Mitchell 6 4 ' A r 2000 square foot house on 10-acre parcel - desires to market garden I in spare time. 5. P. Port 12 3 r A' 2000 square foot house should not I be required for 10-acre farmers. 6. P. Hladysh 12 3 r A' 2000 square foot house should not be required for 10-acre farmers. I 7. B. Rohn 5 5 ' A r 2000 square foot house on 10-c.cre parcel is too big. I 8. H. Birke 5 5 'A r 2000 square foot house on 10-acre parcel toe big - has no children I 9. R. Symons 27 7 r A' 2000 square foot house on 10-acre parcel too big for retirement plans. I 10. K. Erdmanis 16 6 r A r 2000 square foot house too large, excessive, depreciates value of ": property. I 11. E. A. Read 12 5 'G' 2000 square foot house uneconomical and designed only to raise taxes. I 12 M. Lauder 26 9 'A r 2000 square foot requirement depreciates value of property. I 13 M. Dmytruk 12 3 'A r 2000 square foot house too expensive w. Patryluk on average income. I 14 W. Jones 33 9 r A r 2000 square foot house too large for average family. I 15 M. Zwicker 26 4 r A r 2000 square foot house uneconomical and hinders progress of Township - induces idle lot tax and weeded properties. I 16. E. Traugott 33 7 r A r 2000 square foot house unreasonable 40 acres purchased 2 years ago. I 17. J. Doe 26 6 ' A' 2000 square foot house excessive for 10-acre owners who want to I cultivate some land. 18. W. Bowler 3 4 ' A' have prepared plans for 1050 square foot house and objects to increase I to 1150 square feet. I~ 19. W. Scheefer 5 5 ' A' cannot afford 2000 square foot house and requests 1150 square feet. I,' ~ 20. L. Edmunds 31 9 r A r 2000 square foot house discriminatory and seriously limits development I -'_._~---,,:,:,,:.-._. -...,"--. I I I I I I I I (f) Comments (Staff Site Visit) Planning Board Recommendations generally open field and farm not recommended area V~cant land partially wooded not recommended vacant land of 330 foot frontage not recommended with dirt road down the centre vacant fields, north end used for not recommended HEPC line, for sale sign on property vacant low open field with frame garage vacant low open field with shed not recommended not recommended not recommended not recommended vacant rolling bush vacant rolling bush part of farm and has a deep pool not recommended vacant pasture land with a 4-car not recommended garage under construction. vacant open field, backing onto a not recommended ravine vacant scrub land with creek not recommended vacant open field, quite low not recommended generally bush and cultivated not recommended land ' open field with small work shed not recommended vacant pasture land not recommended rolling open field not recommended vacant cultivated land - existing not recommended residence and market garden to the south - Hydro line adjacent to north vacant rolling bushed property not recommended low and side hiU land :tæaveirse:d not recommended by à arse,k !wit~ ~~~Dr residential 'œwelopment i:n th~ area ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I· I 1 No. 21 22. 23. 24 25. 26 27 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. - ) - Name Location Present Statement of Lot Con Zone Objection W. Mann J. Patricio J. Patricio T. Bowles J. McQuhae w. Linton Mrs. E. Spice F. Puckrin I.. Thomson Highland Creek Sand & Gravel J. Regan Co. Consolidated Sand & Gravel Aztecana Corp. Limited 34. B. Jamieson 26 9 11 4 11 4 35 6 33 6 20 3 33 9 6 3 26 6 13 14 5 15 5 16 5 15) 12) 4 14) 22 4 3 9 4 , A' 'A' 'A' , A' , A' 'A' , A' , A' , A' 'G' 'Q' , A' , A' 'Q' 'A' '0 ' 'Å' , A' 2000 square foot home financially restrictive, unsuitable to rural areas and hinders resale - purchased property on basis of 1150 square foot floor space. 2000 square foot should be applicable only to 10-acre lots sold in the future. 2000 square foot should be applicable only to 10-acre lots sold in the future. 2000 square foot house discriminatory lacking in logic - general objection to by-law. By-law denial of rights, limiting and devaluates property for resale 2000 square foot house and 200 foot frontage is ridiculous. lO-acre parcel of which 1/2 is ravine and unworkable - owned for 8 years and has planted 2000 trees 2000 square foot requirement prevents building on this property. 2000 square foot house unecominical and foolish - purchased 10-acre parcel on basis of 1150 square foot house - property will be devaulated. 2000 square foot house impossible - by-law will force farmers children from the Township as' well as retired farmers. 2000 square foot house will cause disappointment and inconvenience - proposes to build $15,000 house. land (186 acres) should be zoned 'Q' and definition enlarged to include processing as well as excavation. presently used for gravel operation and should not be left as non- conforming. 100 foot setback from any road for excavation is not practical. all of property should be zoned 'Q' not just part of pt~vió¥s11 1jfortèd~portion. i~lieves gravel on his ,property and requests 'Q' zoninp.. . \ ----, I I I I I I I I· Comments (Staff Site Visit) vacant scrub land with creek _ for sale sign on property vacant, unworked open field. vacant, unworked open field existing residence on property and adjacent to north and south, farmland opposite in Markham Township, backing onto railroad orchard without building open field and bushed ravine _ hydro to south - frame garage or shed on property - it-- Planning Board Recommendations not recommended not recommended tt,/ not recommended \v ,v f r/ / .. iii ~ not recommended not recommended I fJ\. 11 \1 not recommended generally valley, creek and bush - not recommended appears vacant north portion open field - south portion wooded generally rolling open fields area partially used for quarry _ some older residential (cottages) development with improved creek I , working gravel pit north part in farm· with south portion active,gravel workings the concession road frontage contains existing residential development and some vacant land with the northern portion being worked gravel, pit. not recommended not recommended no action - applicant apply when land is required for use. Recommended that the derlnltlon be amended. (Resolution No. 229/64) recommended for approval 'deferred pending further'consideration with Tewnspip gravel by-law 2767. ,I no action -~applicant apply when land is required for use farm and valley land - no apparent no action - applicant apply when gravel workings on this property land is required fpr use I I ~, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I~ I No. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. . 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. Naae F. Barclay Miller Paving Limited J. Irwin R. Miller W. Gee H. Simpson R. Silver L. Dice R. Kidd Dr. L. Barclay Boyes Golf Course J. Martin R. Betton H. McCleary A. Samarillo J. Rennie C. Smith M. Mowbray Location Present Lot Con Zone 4 5 'G' 13 14 4 'G' 31 5 'V' 15 4 'Q' 27 3 'G' 27 3 'G' 31 4 'G' 'A' 20 8 'A' 33 5 'G' 12 5 'G' 29 30 4 'G' 12 5 'G' 27 3 'G' 19 9 'A' 18 9 ' A' 'R5' 18 9 'A' 2 6 'Cl' - ~- Statement of Objection by-law does not provide for future pits or t:e re-opening of present unused pits - excavation should be permitted to road allowance. should be zoned to reflect present use as 'Q'. questions the dumping of unsightly overburden on 100 foot or 200 foot setback and requests clarification. presently residential use and objects to 'Q' zoning. purchased property for residential use 10 years ago and objects to 'G' zoning. objects to 'G' zoning as property is assesseà for residential. part of property zoned 'A' part zoned 'G' with no physical division - 2000 square foot house is unrealistic, arbitrary and discriminatory. desires recreation park, dancing swimming and fishing use. high land should be excluded from 'G' zoning to permit further residential. 'G' zoning devaluates property. requests 'A' zoning for development opportunities to permit a care- takers residence. desires residential and 'Q' uses for property. presently operates dog kennel and wishes to expand - also objects to Section 15.2 re inspection of land. 2000 square foot house and additional frontage for lots over 2 acres is too restrictive. 2000 square foot house and additional frontage for lots over 2 acres is too restrictive. zoning not agreeable with existing use of construction shop. Motel site not compatible with surrounding area or by-law intention. part of registered plan 373 and consideration deferred for site visit- part of Clark's Hollow greenbelt recommend:that Greenbelt boundary be area moved north to top of bank. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -I Comments (Staff Site Visit) presently worked sand and gravel pit apparently unworked gravel pit and machinery storage property is adjacent to existing gravel workings and north of the Township dump timbered ravine land part open field and part wooded ravine - 6 - Planning Board Recommendations general objection no action recommended no action - applicant apply when land is required for use. deferred for further consideration with Township gravel by-law 2767 not recommended as 'Q' use existing prior to residential and therefore remain as non-conforming. consideration deferred for site visit- not recommended considœration:dOferred føt. site visit- recommend that Greenbelt boundary be realigned as on plan dated June 25/64. rolling vacant land with some no action - applicant apply when bush and ravine at rear with creek land is required for use running through property partially valley flood plains and partially table land south portion of property is bush and, ravine - not suitable for residential development golf course vacant open field house and kennels - west of Clark's Hollo\'l - far18snð ørehltrd to south and east - tøt sale worked farm area stucco house existing - northern portion of property bushed used for storage of heavy equip- ment - old frame elevator and storage shop with concrete block garage - dwelling adjacent to the north is for sale - also owns scrub low land (4.36 acres) west of road recommend that the high table land be excluded from the 'G' zoning not recommended recommend that property be zoned as 02 to accommodate existing ~lf ¿out'S.è \1$.e. no action - applicant apply when land is required for use objection re land inspection not recommended - objection re land use deferred for site visit - see objection # 58 not recommended not recommended not .I.~comrnended, use should be left as non-conforming not recommended I I I j I I I I I I I I I~ I I I I I I I I 1- I~ I II-- No. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. . 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 6(),. 67. 68.. 69. 70. 71. 72. Name L. Graham - 1 - " Location Present Statement of Objection Lot Con Zone 18 Canadian Pacific Railways 18 Sarco Canada Limited W. Ne\.¡man L. Almach A. Colwell S. Osterhout w. Smith F. Goudie ) I. Coudie ) L. Smith ) E. Burns ) P. Gauthier) H. Wideman) H.. Lewis ) G. Wideman ) W. Champion 18 17 18 18 34 27 29 31 32 L. Salgo 18 H. H2~ilton 26 C. H. Robinson 21 Whitevale 29 Golf Course 30 9 'R5' 9 'R5' 9 'Ml ' 6 'A' 8 ' A' 8 ' A' 3 ' A' 7 ' A' 9 'A' 16 6 ' A' 26 , A' 4 5 , A' 9 7 4 , A' , A' 'G' proposes kennel,use. ebjects to residential zoning for railroad used land. objects to 'MI' definition as not complying with the Official Plan. property adjacent to Brougham should be included in village zoning. Claremont Village zoning should include existing residential development. general objection - no objective, no development of senic areas and not in best interests of Township. goneral objection to zoning and inspection 200 foot frontage would prohibit use of many lots. request that Altona be considered a hamlet and zoned accordingly 2000 square foot house and frontage requirements discriminatory and steralizes -'land 2000 square foot house and frontage requirements discriminatory and steralizes·l~Dd. requests zoning to permit extension of existing machine shop. 2000 square foot house excessive 2000 square foot house excessive requests 02 zoning to accommodate Golf Course """",;~ .:;.-:- I I I I Comments (Staff Site Visit) - ß - Planning Board Recommendations vacant lot with existing makeshift not recommended apparently unused kennels existing residential to the south and east with living quarters in station all uses adjacent are residential _ for sale and relocation sign on property worked farm land apparently built to north, east and west as residential, with central portion zoned 'A' north portion is valley, creek and bush, southerly part pasture land and farm house opposite to the Dunkeld subdivision. orchard and farm '-. .'. . generally ravine, creek and bush vacant land apparently used for picnics residence and machine shop on property vacant open field open field uncultivated golf course I I I I I I I I not recommended, use should be left as non conforming not recommended - Official Plan general zoning by-law specific no. recommendation pending completion of village study no recommendation pending completion of village study general objection no action recommended consideration deferred for site visit- recommend that Greenbelt boundary be realigned as 'on plan dated July 9/64. not recommended no recommendation pending completion of village study not recommended not recommended no recommendation pending completion of village study not recommended not recommended recommend that property be zoned as 02 to accommodate existing golf course use .. 3 ... Items 39 to ~l - Môved by Mr. Newman i se conded by Mrs. M cPhers on CARRIE D Item 42 - Moved by Mr. New'man. s e c on de d by Mr. Wan k . - CARRIE D Item ~3 - Moved by Mr. Newman, seconded by Mr. Waring - CARRIE D Item ~~ - Moved by Mr. Newman. seconded by Mr. Span g - CARRIED Item ~5 - Move d by Mr~ Newman, seconded by Mr. Waring - CARRIE D Item ~6 - Moved by Mr. Newman, seconded by Mr. Wank - CARRIE D Item ~7 - Moved by Mr. Waring, seconded by Mr. Wank - CARRIE D Items 48 & 49 - Moved by Mr. Wank, seconded by Mr. Waring - CARRIED Item 50 - Moved by Mr. Waring, seconded by Mr. Wank - CARRIED Item 51 - Moved by Mr, Wank, seconded by Mr. Waring - CARRIED Items 52 & 53 - Moved by Mr. Wank. seconded by Mr. Newman - CARRIED Item 5~ - Moved by Mr. Newman, seconded by Mr. Wank - CARRIED Items 55 & 56 - Moved by Mr. Waring,. seconded by Mr. Wank - CARRIED (Mr. Newman abstaining) Items 57 & 58 - Moved by Mr. Newman, seconded by Mr. Waring - CARRIED Item 59 - Moved by Mr. Newman, seconded by Mrs. McPherson - CARRIED Items 60 to 67 - Moved by Mr. Newman, seconded by Mr. Spang - CARRIED Item 68 - Moved by Mr. Waring, seconded by Mr. Campbell - CARRIED Items 69, 70, 71 - Moved by Mr. Waring, seconded by Mr. Wank - CARRIED Item 72 --Moved by Mr. Newman. seconded by Mr. Waring - CARRIED It was brought to the attention of Council that a warning light should be placed at the south side of Clark's Hollow bridge at the curve. Mrs. McPherson agreed to inform County Road Department. Four gravel companies asked for full loads in half load season and they would supply gravel for any damage. Referred to Road Committee. DI RE CTI ONS 1. Mr. Poulsson submit to Council a report on why road work reported in resolution 439/64 was not done. 2. Clerk supply cop i e s of ( 1) Mr. Poulsson's rep ort on servi ces for 20 acres Industrial Lan ds . ( 2) Mr. Poulsson's rep ort on road work not completed in 1964. 3. Clerk forward used car By-Law to Solicitor. Mrs. McPherson conveyed Mrs. Culley's appreciation to Firemen for work and thoughtfulness at her recent fire. Clerk convey to Chief Lynde~ ~. Clerk contact Hydro re burned out light, No.2 Highway and Fairport Road. On Motion of Mr. Waring, seconded by ~~' L.¡,. 19 (.. r Mr. Campbell, the meeting adjourned. ',- ~~eeve ~ . Clerk APP ROVED