Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJuly 12, 2017 pickering.ca Committee of Adjustment Agenda Meeting Number: 9 Date: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Samantha O’Brien T. 905.420.4660, extension 2023 Email sobrien@pickering.ca Agenda Committee of Adjustment Wednesday, July 12, 2017 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Page Number (I) Adoption of Agenda (II) Adoption of Minutes from June 21, 2017 1-5 (III) Reports 1. P/CA 36/17 Fampa Holdings Ltd. 962 Kingston Road 6-10 2. P/CA 44/17 G. & G. Mattia 677 Front Road 11-17 3. P/CA 47/17 D. Barkey 1712 Central Street 18-22 4. P/CA 48/17 & P/CA 49/17 N. & F. Nohos 1937 Rosebank Road 23-26 5. P/CA 50/17 P. Cummins 1796 Fairport Road 27-32 6. P/CA 51/17 K. Storey & R. Kay 5049 Brock Road 33-38 7. P/CA 52/17 to P/CA 54/17 M. Casey 1307 Commerce Street 39-45 8. P/CA 55/17 & P/CA 56/17 J. Roche & J. Cusimano 1474 Rougemount Drive 46-50 9. P/CA 57/17 W. Ayub 1135 Ridgewood Court 51-56 (IV) Adjournment -C~~~­ p](KERJNG Pending· Adoption Present Tom Copeland -Vice-Chair David Johnson -Chair Eric Newton Denise Rundle Also Present I \ 1 Committee of Adjustment · Meeting Minutes Wednesday, June 21, 2017 7:00pm Main Committee Room Nilesh, Surti, Manager, Developmertt Review & Urban Design Samantha O'Brien, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Absent Sean Wiley . · Deborah Wylie, Secretary-Treasurer (I) Adoption of Agenda Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland That the agenda for the Wednesday, June 21, 2017 meeting be adopted. (II) Ad<;»ption of Minutes Moved by Tom Co"peland · Seconded by Eric Newton Carried Unanimously That the minutes of the 7th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, May 3·1, 2017 be adopted. Carried Unanimously Page 1 of 5 2 --:---C~ ~f­ p](KER1NG (Ill) Reports 1. PICA 45/17 F. Chapman 828 Naroch Boulevard Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, June 21, 2017 7:00pm Main Committee Room The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended by By-law: • to permit an uncovered platform and associated steps not exceeding 0.9 of a metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required side yard, whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding . 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.0 metre into the required side yard · ~ to recognize a minimum east side yard setback of 1.0 metre to an existing unenclosed carport, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard se~back of 1.5 metres • to recognize a maximum lot coverage of 36 percent, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent • to recognize an existing accessory structl!re (shed) setback 0.3 of a metre from the east lot line, whereas the by-law requires accessory structures to be set back a minimum of 0.6 of a metre from all lot lines The applicant requests approval of these va.riances in order to obtain a building permit to replace an existing uncovered platform and associated steps in the west side yard and obtain zoning compliance for existing structures. The Manager, Development Review & Urban Design, outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Departme.nt expressing no comments on the application. In response to comments submitted from the applicants, Regional Councillor-Ward 2, · Bill McLean, and City Councillor-Ward 2, I an Cumming, have also submitted written comments expressing ~heir support of staff's recommendati'on to this application. ' Fiona Chapman, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further , representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Fiona Chapman stated the purpose of this application is to replace an existing structure that was originally constructed in the early 1980's. Page 2 of 5 -C~()f­ p](KERJNG Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Eric Newton . .. 3 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, June 21, 2017 · 7:00pm Mairi Committee Room That application PICA 45117 by F. Chapman, be Approved on the grounds that the . requested variances are minor in natur~. desirable for the approp,date development of the land, and in keeping_ with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the .following conditions: 1 .. That these variances apply only to the proposed uncovered platform and associated steps within the west side yard and the existing structures, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted-plans. · · 2. That the applicant obtain a building. permit for the proposed construction by June 21, 2019, or this decision shall become null and void.· PICA 46117 N.Lalsingh 2038 Duberry Dr!ve Carried Unanimously . The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By..:law 1976/85, .·. to permit an uncovered platform (deck) and associated steps not exceeding 1.4 metres · in height above grade to project a maximum of 3.8 metres into the required rear yard; whereas, uncovered steps and platforms not exceeding 1.0, metre in height above grade · may project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a . buiiding permit to construct an uncovered platform (deck) and associated steps in the rear yard. The Manager, Development Review & Urban Design outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions . . Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Spencer Joy, agent, was present to represent the application. Sylvia & Errol Anderson of 2040 Duberry Drive were present in opposition to the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Sylvia Anderson stated the applicant's walkway has been raised, which is causing a . drainage issue onto their property. If the proposed variance was approved, · Sylvia Anderson stated she would not like drainage to be of further concern. Page 3 of 5 4 -Ci/j()f- p](KERJNG Committee of Adjustment · Meeting Minutes Wednesday, June 21, 2017 7:00pm Main Committee Room The Manager, Development Review & Urban Design stated drainage concerns can best be addressed by the City's Engineering Services [)epartment. He also stated that he · would make note of Sylvia & Errol Anderson's contact information to have Engineering Services st9ff conduct a site visit to inspect both properties for drainage issues. . ~ . Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland That application_ PICA 46/17 by N. Lalsingh, be Approved on the grounds that the uncovered platform (deck) and associated steps not exceeding 1.4 metres in height above grade to project a maximum of 3.8 metres into the required rear yard,· is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed platform (deck), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applica~t obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by June 21, 2019, or this decision shall become null arid void. Carried Unanimously r · Page 4 of 5 --'---c~ of-· - P1CKER1NG (IV) Adjournment Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland s· Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, June 21, 2017 7:00pm Main Committee Room That the 8th. meeting of the 2017 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 7:13pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, July 12, 2017. Carried Unanimously Date Chair Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Page 5 of 5 6 -C~~~­ PJ(KERJNG From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Dev~lopment Review Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 36/17 Date: July 12, 2017 Subject: Committee or Adjustment Application PICA 36/17 Fampa Holdings Ltd. · 962 Kingston Road· Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2498/87: • to permit a vehicle sales or rental establishment, whereas the by-law does not permit a vehicle sales or rental establishment • to permit the open storage of vehicles in all yards, whereas the by-law does not permit open storage in any yard The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to permit a vehicle sales or rental ·establishment use on the subject la~ds. · Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject property "Mixed Use Areas ..:. Mixed . . Corridors" wit~ in the Dunbarton Neighbourhood. Permissible uses wi~hin this designation include, but are· not limited to: residential; retailing of goods and services generally serving the needs of the surrounding neighbourhoods; -offices and restaurants; community, cultural and , . recreational uses, and special purpose commercial uses. Special purpose commercial uses are recognized as uses such as: a large format retailers; retail warehouses; membership clubs; theme and/or specialty retailers; automotive uses; and, ancillary retailing of other goods and services including restaurants. The City Development Department considers a vehicle dealership to be a special purpose commercial use as it is an automotive use. . ' Report PICA 36/17 July 12, 2017 ' Page 2 The subject property is currently· zoned "SC-12"-Special Commercial Zone within Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2498/87, which only permits business office and professional office and includes a provision prohibiting open storage in any yard. · I Appropriateness of the Application Variance to permit a Vehicle Sales or Rental Establishment Use and Open Storage of Vehicles in all Yards • the owner is requesting to expand the list of permitted uses on the subject property to. include a vehicle sales or rental establishment use and to allow the open storage of vehicles in any yard - • the applicant has advised that the requested variances will not result in any alterations to the subject property or the existing building • the abutting lands to the north and west, across Merritton Road, and to the ec;~st are · currently zoned and occupied by a range of commercial uses including two vehicle dealerships, a business office, and a place of worship · _ • the property immediately tb the east Was rezoned in 1988 to permit a vehicle sales or rental establishment and was occupied by· a vehicle dealership prior to undergoing a site-specific zoning by-law amendment in 2011 to permit range of commercial and institutional uses · • the lands to the west were rezoned in 2003 to permit vehicle sales ana service use and. to allow for the storage of outdoor vehicles in any yard . • the variance to permit open storage of vehicles in all yards is required as the· by-law currently does not permit opeh storage in any yard • the outdoor open storage of vehicles is _a significant component of a vehicles sales use • the proposed use of a vehicle sales or rental establishment on the subject property . would be compatible with the established commercial uses on surrounding lands • the subject property provides for sufficient parking to accommodate the proposed use, as the site-specific by-law requires all permitted uses to provide parking at a rate of 4.5 parking spaces ·per 100 square· metres of gross leasable floor area, whereas the parking ratio for vehicle sales on the lands to the west require par~ing to be· provided at a rate of 3.0 parking spaces per 100 square metres of gross leasable floor area. • the proposed use would be in keeping with the range of uses permitted on adjacent . lands as well as along Kingston· Road . • the proposed variances would maintain the general intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, which is t9 accommodate a wide range of commercial uses ·. • the requested variances are mirior in nature, desirable for the appropriate. development of the property and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • no comments on the application 7 8 Report PICA 36/17 July 12, 2017 Page 3 · Date of report: July 4, 2017 Comments prepared by: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review CM:DW:Id J:\Doc11J11ents\DevelopmenftD-3700120171PCA 36-17\Report\PCA 36-17 Reporldocx Attachments -OftiD/- pJ(KERJNG City Development Department 9 Location ·Ma File: PICA 36/17 ~Cdpat­ PJCKERJNG City Development Department Cl < 0 a: Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA36/17 APPLICANT: Fampa Holdings Ltd. to permit a vehicle sales rental establishment use to permit the open of vehicles in all PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: BFC Range 3 Part Lot 26 and Part Road allowance between Cbn1 and BFC Range 3 RP 40R1 090 Parts 6 to 13, 18 (962 Kingston Rd) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: June 19,2017 ...... 11 Report to -C~~~­ P-J(KERJNG Committee of Adjustment From:. · Deborah Wylie, M.CIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review Application Number: PICA 44117 Date: July 12, 2017 Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 44117 G. & G. Mattia 677 Front Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended: • to permit a minimum north side yard width of 1.2 metres and a minimum south side yard width of 0.6 of a metre, where a garage is erected as part of a .detached dwelling; -..........1 whereas the py-law requires a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling - • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 39 percent; whereas the by-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent • to permit all accessory buildings, excluding private detached garages, to have a total lot coverage not exceeding 11.5 percent of the lot a tea; whereas the by-law requires that the total'lot coverage of all accessory buildings, excluding private detached garages, shall not exceed 5 percent of the lot area · • to recognize a minimum lot frontage of 7.6 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres • to recognize a minimum lot area of 331.8 square metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 465 square metres The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to · construct a detached dwelling and accessory building. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: · 1. That these variances apply only to the detached dwelling and accessory building, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. · 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July 12, 2018, · or this decision shall become null and void. 1 2 Report PICA 44/1 T Comment. Official Plan and Zoning By-law July 12, 2017 Page 2 Pickering'Official Plan-"Urban Residential-Low Density Areas" within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 2511, as amended-"R4"-Detached Dwelling fourth Density Zone Appropriateness of the Application Side Yard Width Variance • the intent of a minimum side yard width requirement is to provide an appropriate· ·separation distance between structures on abutting properties in order to ensure compatibility with the existing neighbourhood, provide appropriate pedestrian access between dwellings, and to accommodate grading, drainage and residential services • the Zoning By-law requires a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling . • the applicant is proposing a minimum north side yard width of 1.2 metres and a minimum south side yard width of 0.6 of a metre • the property currently has a frontage of approximately 7.6 metr~s • the proposed dwelling will be approximately 5.8 metres wide and 10.3 metres in height, which will accommodate a main entrance and single car garage,. and represents an appropriate development of the site . · · • the proposed side yard widths of 1.2 metres and 0.6 metres maintains the character of . the existing residential community as other properties along Front Road and Annland Street have been approved with minimum side yard widths of between 0.2 of a metre (to recognize an existing condition) to 1.5 metres • the existing detached dwelling, to be demolished, has a south side yard width of approximately 0.4 of a metre; the proposed south side yard width of 0.6 of a metre is an improvement on the existing condition · . • the ·proposed side yard widths .will provide an adequate separation between the dwellings and the property line to accommodate pedestrian access on one side, grading, drainage and residential services Lot Coverage Variance • the intent of the maximum lot coverage p.rovision is to ensure that the size, scale and massing of a dwelling, and accessory buildings is appropriate for the lot size and to ensure an adequate amount of outdoor amenity space remains uncovered by buildings on a lot • the c;3pplicant has requested a variance to increase the maximum lot coverage from 33 percent to 39 percent • the proposed dwelling is approximately 90.6 square metres in area, and the proposed accessory building is approximately 37.6 square metres in area; when combined the tWo structures result in a total lot coverage of 39 percent of the lot area Report PICA 44/17 July 12, 2017 13 Page 3 • the increase in lot coverage will provide for the appropriate development of the land as · the size and massing of the· proposed dwelling and accessory building will be in keeping ·with the character of the surrounding neighbourhood; other properties on Front Road and Annland Street have been approved with lot coverages up to 57.3 percent (to recognize -an existing condition) • the proposed development will.maintain a sufficient amount of outdoor amenity area that will remain uncovered and unobstructed within the front and rear yards of the property Accessory Building Lot Coverage Variance • _the intent of the maximum lot coverage requirement of 5.0 percent of the total lot area of all accessory buildings, excluding private detached garages, is to maintain an appropriate amount of amenity area uncovered by buildings on a lot and to ensure the massing~ scale and size of buildings are appropriate for the size of the lot • the proposed accessory building is approximately 37.6 square metres in area which results in a total lot coverage of 11.3 percent • the proposed accessory building is appropriately setback a minimum of 1.0 metre away from all lot lines, and is below the maximum height for accessory structures in a residential zone (3.5 metres) · · . • the proposed accessory building is replacing an-existing accessory building to be demolished · • the existing accessory building straddles the north lot line, is set back less than 0.1 of a metre from the rear lot line, and currently covers approximately 12.8 percent of the total lot area; the replacement accessory building is an improvement on the existing condition · · · • the proposed increase in total lot coverage does not appear to subordinate the principal residential use of the property . • there is an existing wood privacy fence to minimize the visual impact of the accessory building in the side and rear yardl;i · Lot Frontage and Lot Area Variance • the intent of the minimum lot.frontage .and minimum lot area requirements is to ensure a usable lot size that is compatible with the surrou·nding neighbourhood ahd is of a sufficient size to support the permitted use · • the By-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres and a minimum lot area of 465 square metres • the subject property currently has a minimum frontage _of 7.6 metres and a minimum lot area of331.8 square metres • the lot was created prior to the passing of Zoning By-law 2511 • these variances will bring the existing legal non-complying lot into compliance with the Zoning By-law Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the apprqpriate development of the land and maintain the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. /' ' · 1 4 Report PICA 44/17 Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: July 6, 2017 Rory McNeil Planner I RM:Id July 12, 2017 Page4 • the existing tree in front of 677 Front Road is on the Municipal right-of-way_ • the City will not permiHhe removal of the tree for the reiocation of the driveway into the property • the proposed dwelling should be setback to match the existing dwelling and the driveway access must be kept on the north side of the property ih order to protect the tre~ and it's root system • tree protection fencing must be erected and maintained during the extent of con~truction • any tree limb or root removal that may be req.uired, must be done by a certified arborist under the supervision of the City's arborist . • the City's standard tree protection notes and detail must be · adhered to Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2017\PCA 44-17\Report\PCA 44-17.docx · Attachments -·-04;Df-. -' , PICKERING City Development Department PN-RU 1 I! Front Street . 7.6_rn_ . 1 to recognize a minimum v~! ·: . .J ~ frontyarddepthof7.6 ~-~ !·.:. :·:1 ~etres, where a garage . · E ~ ~-· · _.! 1s erected as part of a ...... ~ :· .. : :. . "' ~ '. detached dwelling -cx:i~J ~J: _ ,; ~ ~ , ~~I ~~ I' ·~ ~J~·~ri .. 1~L : ~ts?GI ,_l :I . '"''••-. j II~ I (i\ Proposed I~ to permit a minimum south side yard depth of 0.6 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling Dwelling 1 1 90.5 m2 • "" lj I' 11 . to penilit a minimum north side yard depth of 1.2 metres -0.6 m ~ ~ ; r-----..... ~---1 i :C~ >ll 1.2 m , I . . • ~ -to recognize a ~ ~ ~ ' ~ minimum lot area of · + ~-& I . 331.8 square metres . "~ .h· :--~=:=t . -~: I -~ .... ,t:::;=:=l . . . I , .. . ., .,. -~ ·. '}: , ~ Lo_t ~ .. 1r-f..-<.~· . to permit ·au accessory .,. .... 7""--- buildings, excluding · · Area · · ----------. private detached .;~ to permit a maximum garages, to have a total -. -· · . J lot coverage of 39 lot coverage not · 1·0 m 1~. : .. · · -: -<'-Jl,;p~e-rc_e_n_t ____ ___. exceeding 11.5 percent H ~ " - of the lot area ff" tp~eped -~ ~, ~Acces~or-y t--J. ·~ , i·.' ~Building h,b7.6 m2 I'"':'~ --at;; ~1--· PICKERING 1.0 m..:. ~: :·.1 .. _;:··. . . -~-.-t;;_.:,--"""":1. i'"' Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA.44/17 APPLICANT: G. & G. Mattia City Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 65 Block E Part Lot 4, 5 (677 Front Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. T DATE: June 21, 2017 TOP Of ROOF PEAK -'!<----------- -~oJ­ PJCKERJNG City Development Department 12 9~ MI-POINT Of ROOF FIN. GRADE I I I ~ I I I . "" r-\-I I 111~111~ -~II lj_j ____ L/.J _ ___:_ _____ u OFmo®J[_I _______ ~------- PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION - SCALE 3/ I G" = I '-0" View From Front Street Submitted Plan FILE No: PICA 44/17 APPLICANT: G. & G. Mattia PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 65 Block E Part Lot 4, 5 (677 Front Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. -DATE: June 21, 2017 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 47117 Date: July 12, 2017 Principal Planner-Development Review · Subject: .. · Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 47117 D. Barkey 1712 Central Street Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By ... law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640106: • to permit a minimum .distance of 2.4 metres from the proposed gas bar canopy to the street lines of Central Street and Brock Road, whereas the by-law ~equires a minimum distance of 12.0 metres between any building or structure and any street line • to permit a proposed gas bar canopy to be erected 11.0 metres from the centerline of Brock Road, whereas the by-law does not permit no building or structure to be erected closer than 19.5 metres to the centerline of Brock Road The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain site plan approval for a proposed gas bar canopy~ · Re.commendation The City Development Department considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefme recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. · Thqt these variances apply only to the proposed gas bar canopy, as generally sited and · . outlined on the applicant's submitted .plans. 2. That the applicant obtain site plan approval for the proposed construction by July 12, 2016, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Oak Ridges Moraine Rural Hamlets" within the Claremont Settlement Area Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640106 -"ORM-C2" Report PICA 047/17 Appropriateness of the Application July 12·, 20117 1 9 · . Page 2 . • the by-law requires C!ny building or structure be a minimum of 12.0 metres from any street line and does not permit a building or structure to be erected closer than 19.5 metres to the centerline of Brock Road · · • the applicant is requesting a gas bar canopy to be located 2.4 metres from the street lines of Central Street and Brock Road and 11.0 metres from the centerline of Brock Road • the proposed canopy is intended to revitalize the aesthetics of the existing gas bar and provide a protective cover for patrons • the proposed canopy will be supported by two columns which wi.ll be based where the current gar bar pumps are located • the gas bar pumps have existed in the current locati<;m for numerous years and are not proposed to be moved • the proposed gas bar canopy is required to obtain Site Plan Approval and is currently subject to an active site plan application · • the applicant's proposal was reviewed by the Site Plan Advisory Committee on June 28, 2017 and no concerns regarding the gas bar canopy were raised • the distance between the gas bar canopy and the street lines of Central Street and Brock Road, and centerline of Brock Road is calculated by measuring to the shortest distance, which is the edge of the canopy's roof • an appropriate distance will be .maintained between the columns supporting the proposed canopy and the street lines of Central Street and Brock Road • the proposed canopy will be entirely unenclosed and will not result in a negative visual impact on the streetscape of Central Street or Brock Road . · • the requested variances are.minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintain the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Input From Other Sou,rces Engineering Services Date of r~port: July 6, 2017 Comments. prepared by: ' CM:DW:Id J:\Documenls\Developmeni\D-3700\2017\PCA 47-17\Report\PCA 47-17 Report.doc Attachments • no comments on the application Deborah Wylie, MCIP,. RPP Principal ·Planner-Development Review :L v City Development Department v lj .I A IF l =-j--L-1--'-1~1---t I 1--1.-----1 ,..,_J ------1 I 1--w w 0:: ----l 1-~L "I l ;::; !--'---t-- f-- f-- = ACo"RN LANE I Location Map File: P/CA47/17 Applicant:D. Barkey Property Description: Plan 12 Part Lot 1 & 3. RP 40R15501 Part 1 (1712 Central Street) Date: May. 31,2017 to permit the proposed gas bar canopy to be erected 11.0 metres from the centreline of Brock Road p~-=-~~( ~~-= ;\ I \I I . I I , \ \ \ EXJS1IHG SEP11C sY51EIA \ I TO RE.!!NN I \ I -I \ I . L-------l I I \ to permit a minimum lt---\~\-r:~~~:&~~~~~~\7---~-L--J distance of 2.4 metres \'\ from the proposed gas bar canopy to the street lines of Central Street and Brock Road \\ I: I ~ lJ '. \ ~ ·_( __ ----~.~ '---Cdu{)I-- PICKERlNG City Development Department -.,· 1' N Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 47/17 .APPLICANT: 0; Barke PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 12 Part Lot 1 & 3 RP 40R15501 Part 1 .(1712 Central Street) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: June 28, 2017 ® SIDE ELEV TION -3 I Scale: 1:50 --CdpoJ-- PJCKERJNG City Development Department Submitted Plan · FILE No: P/CA 47/17 APPLICANT: D. Barke PROPERTY DESCRIPTiON: Plan 12 Part Lot 1 & 3 RP 40R15501 Part 1 (1712 Central Street) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: June 28, 2017 23 Report to -Cdt;bf-.- P1CKER1NG Cc:>mmittee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 48117 & PICA 49117 Date: July 12, 2017 From: Subject: Application . Deborah Wylie~ MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review -' ' Committee of Adjustment Applications PICA 48/17 & PICA 49117 N. & F. Nohos 1937 Rosebank Road ' The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 3009189 to permit a minimum lot frontage of 12.9 metres; whereas the by-law permits a minimum lot · front~ge of 13.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of these minor variance applications in order to create one additional lot through the Region of Durham Land Division Committee and obtain a building permit to construct a two-storey detached dwelling on the proposed severed and retained parcels. Recommendations PICA 48117 & PICA 49/17 The City Development Department considers a minimum lot frontage of 12.9 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed lot configuration, as generally sited and outlined as Part 1 and Part 2 on the applicant's submit~ed plans. · 2. That the applicant obtain final clearance for Land Division Application (LD 067117) by July 17, 2018 or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July 12, 2019,· or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential -Low Density Areas" within the Amberlea Neighbourhood · Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 3009189 . ...: 'S 1 ', Single Residential Zone 24 Report PICA 48117 & PICA 49117 July 12,2017 'J Page 2 · Appropriateness of the Application Reduced Lot Frontage Variances • the intent of the minimum lot frontage requirement is to ensure a usable lot size that is compati_ble with the surrounding neighbourhood · • the Zoning By-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 13.5 metres • the applicant is requesting a minimum lot frontage of 12.9 metres • lot frontages in the area range from 12.2 metres to 16.0 metres • the reduced lot frontage from 13.5 metres to 12.9 metres would continue to provide a usable lot size, due to the increased depth of these lots at approximately 38 metres • the proposed lot frontages would allow for the development of detached dwellings with appropriate performance standards to ensurE) compatibility of any future development with the neighbourhood character established along Rosebank Road • the requestecl variance to reduce the minimum lot frontage is consistent with previous Committee of Adjustment approvals within the surrounding neighbourhood along Rosebank F{oad • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: July 4, 2017. Comments prepared by: t::Jta Paray, MCIP, RPP Planner I LP:Id • no comments on the application / . Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2017\PCA 48-17 & PCA 49-17\Report\PCMS-17 & PCM9-17 Report.doc Attachments FiNCH AVENUE 1--lJ II !--r--r--r--~\ !{:_ 1--1--r-- ~ 1---r-- r-----r-- - ---z w (.) (/) w !--r-- 0:: (.) 0 '----~ II II ' -0:: -- <( - !--r-- r----- - Clllllllllllllllllllllll -- II II .WOODSMERE CRESCENT -Cdt;Df-. PICKERING City Development ·Department Location Ma File: PICA 48117 and PICA 49117 - 1 PN-RU -""= -PICA 48117 to permit a minimum lot frontage of 12.9 metres ·---~ .-----: - -'----- """ ... ~ ~ i .~ i~7 '• 7.5 /0 .... I I ru ~ I D" \o ASPHALT I': ..... PCA48/17 ._ (/.lui DRIVEWAY tO u; I 18.5: ' 12.3 1'1 I. _j .q td I.J 0 PROPOSED 2 STOREY ~ -J> 1<-' -DWELLING NO. 1937 z COVERED PART 1 7\: PORCH DECK /0 8.3 ""' D J> c'l t::l ..; -<'I -'1<--...; r .~ ' I 7.5 I .. ) I I ASPHALT ~ I -I': DRIVEWAY "<!; PCA49/17 tO tO I I 18.5 12.3 I _j lri PROPOSED 2 STOREY I.J d ~ 1<---DWELLING NO. 1937 .... ru ~ COVERED PART 2 \o PORCH PICA 49117 DECK to permit a minimum lot 8.3 r frontage of 12.9 metres -"! ..... '.1' N Submitted Plan Clip ot FILE No: PCA 48/17 & PCA 49/17 ' PlCKERlNG APPLICANT: N. & F. Nohos PROPERTY D.ESCRIPTION: Con 1 N Pt Lot 30 40R11970 Part 6 & 8 City Development (1937 Rosebank Road) Department FULL SCALE. COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING I·DATE: June 13, 2017 CI"TY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. L:\PLANNING\COREL\PLANNING\APPS\PCA\2017 . . 27 Report to -Cdt;~f-. - PJCKERJNG Committee of Adjustment .From: Subject: Application Application Number: PICA 50/17 Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP · Principal Planner-Development Review Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 50/17 P. Cummins 1796 Fairport Road · Date: July 12, 2017 The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling; whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 1.8 metres, where a garage is erected as. part of a detached dwelling. " The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for the construction of a detached dwelling. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a side yard width of 1.2 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling, to be a major variance that is not considered to be desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general · intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law·; and therefore recommends Refusal of the proposed variance. or If the applicant were to request that the application be amended to permit a side yard width of 1.5 metres where a garage_is erected as part of a detached dwelllng, the following recommendation would apply: The City Development Department considers a side yard width .of 1.5 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this. variance apply only to the proposed detached dwelling that will be revised to reflect the 1.5 metre setback, as generally outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July 12, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. 28 Report PICA 50/17 July 12, 2017 . Page 2 Comment I Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential -Low Density Area" within the Dunbarton · Neighbourhood · Zoning By-law 3036 -"R3"·-Third Density Residential Zone Appropriateness of the Application Side Yard Width Variance • the intent of a minimum side yard width is to provide an appropriate separation distance between structures on abutting properties in order to ensure· compatibility with the existing nei-ghbourhood, provide appropriate peoestrian access between dwellings, and· to accommodate grading, drainage and residential services such as air conditioning . units and utility_ meters , . • the applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit minimum side yard widths of 1.2 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling; whereas the by-law requires minimum side yard widths of 1.8 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling · • the reduced side yard width of 1.2 metres is proposed for both sides of the proposed dwelling • · the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines contains provisions for development along Fairport. Road south of the Dunbarton Creek Ravine that support maintaining larger lot depths and larger building setbacks (a minimum side yard width of. 1 .5 metres. is supported) · . • the subject property has a large lot 9epth of approximately 111.0 metres and is sited on the west side of Fairport Road south of the Dunbarton Creek Ravine • C1 number of previous variances have b~en approVed along Fairport Road to permit reduced side yard widths of 1.5 metres - • it is staff;s opinion that the requested variance of a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres on both sides does not meet the intent of the City's Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines and is not consistent with. the character of the ·neighbourhood · · • it is staff's opinion that the subject property can accommodate the proposed detached dwelling with minimum side yarp widths of 1.5 metres, in keeping with the Dunbarton Neighbourhood Development Guidelines and the character of the neighbourhood Staff are of the opinion that the subject variance is a major variance, is not considered to be desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and is not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Refusal of the proposed variance. · Report PICA 50/17 July 12~ 2017 29 Page 3 Should the Committee see merit in the application, staff recommends thatthe applicant · maintain minimum side yard widths of 1.5 metres, where a garage is erected as part of the detached dwelling. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services· . . Date of report: July 5, 2017 Comments prepared by: Rory McNeil Planner I RM:Id· J:\Dacuments\Develapment\D-370012017\PCA 50-17\Repart\PCA 50-17 Repart.dacx Attachments ' . • · no comments on the application ·fJ4JIJ· Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Develqpmerit Review STROUDS LANE . f- f- f- f- J--->::1--1--~ 1--1-------1 1---1--' I--,---0 f-----1 1----01-- 1---0 r------J--------j 1---\---$ f---~z t---1---0 1----+------l 1----------1 \--() -~ I ~ ~:=-· kl--\f-Hhi-Trl-+-+-rr--T-+H II t+-l ~ ~ ~1-----L-----l r---~'y I----".,"' f---------1 01----+-l }-- 1-----1 ~ r---~ . ~""T""T""r"\~ II I I r---~ !z a: 1---o'-L-1.,-L.Ll--J . . C5 t----,----'---1 ..___ ....1 w 01----1-----1 1-----1-_J-------.1 0::: 1---------lr----- ....1 () "" > 1------l-----1 ~ ~ Iii 1----1-----1 1----.....J--_J--------1 [j r----- 1------l-----1 g r------1 ~ i I "" iii . ~ ,~ t-----+---1 0::: w 1-----i-.--., ft--------1([ 1-- r---l==i===l fu ~ ~:1---+---1~1----,---1 1-----~ \~.)--------1 ~ 1-----l---l r---1------,--''----1 <( ~ I--,) ~ 1--~ en 1-------J---t lr-------'--,--J-.1--f:.-'--./-1+--_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ ---1-1 ;= r--1--s: ~ ID Cl r-----:-0 1------l-----1 I--f--0::: ~ 1---'f\t--------1 r--<( 1------l-----1 ~ ) . . g 1------l-----1 r---. 0 1-4.-"\.-----.1 r---~ r----~ L '' ) t--~ 1------l-----1 1---.L.._--l----------1 Lf I) 1---'---+-----1 · ~ ~ s.usJEcr -, ,. I rn-rmlr~~h----,l,~)~_J J ;=:::= r----PRO~ERTY -4 ~ \ , ~ . ~ -I I ) \-\.L--l........l-.1.--1--L..~----4 '\ ~ ';--y ,..--GOLDENRIDGE ROAD 1....../ ~ ~_,....,.....,..~"T""'\~ . (.I ' ~ ~ ~~ § ,_ 1-.,_,_...,..,..--,--~-..,._.,--;\.--\ L,-T -1---1 I~ ~ .....,..,..~ 0 -1---; <( '--'-·___.__../ RUSHTON ROAD I \ n-r---. ~ ~ v: F I ~ 1----+-----.1 1 1------'-l \ \ I I ~ ~-~ s ADYBROOK DRIVE ~ I ~ E 8:= u Y.( ~~~ t=i ~~ ~1--r--r----1 n ~~ wty' MWTES 1\\ 1-......-_j-----J ----HI--L.J....l..T71'::_j__. """"~ ' ~ 1--,___[T\__..------\ I I ~ ~UNBARTON ROAD - I I SHEPPARD AVENUE \ -~t>/-.­ P1CKER1NG City Development Department Location Mao File: PICA 50/17 Applicant:P. Cummins Property Description: Plan 820 Part Lot 5 Now 40R25432 Part 2 · (1796 Fairport Road) Date: Jun. 02, 2017 :U ~geh~o:':;~~;~:r ~~~;i~~e~~~:~~~~~~~Q~f~aa~a~~~~~~:ee~:r::t~~e~:~~:~.~~~~~t~~=%:~.~aluraJ Resources. SCALE: ,1 :5, QQQ I @Teranet Entemrises Inc. and Hs suooners all r! hts reserved.: C Municioal Pro;;;-Assessment et~maffillon and Hs sUoo!iers all rlnhts reserved.: TI.IIS IS NOT A Dl '.e.,.. Q!:' SURVEY. PN-R U ----------·-------------------,.,-----------------------------------· <--16". '6-m ---------~~~-----3 I to permit a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling l. ~ l~·~~~~"--' ·-_______ ,1 _______________ ---1 ' f"" -/ /r r;.frl ----·---------------·---·~----~-<b . "'1 ' <,;----~·--------~-----,;;., J m --------------:) H~o?oSGD 13\.AILDIJ-JG: I I I i I ' I I I I I -I -E f II) (o :t - \v ------___ _j---------~~----·----1 ..,, -Cripof- PJ(KERJNG Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 50/17 APPLICANT: P. Cummins City Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 820 Part Lot 5 Now 40R25432 Part 2 (1796 Fairport Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. -DATE: June 26, 2017 -~6~~ PlCKERlNG City Development Department !-' ---~·-· Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 50/17 APPLICANT: P. Cummins PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 820 Part Lot 5 Now 40R25432 Part 2 (1796 Fairport Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: June 26, 2017 -----C~~~ . P.1CKER1NG Report to 33 Committee of Adjustment Applic~tion Number: PICA 51/17 Date: July 12, 2017 From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 51/17 K. Storey & R. Kay 5049 Brock Road Application The ·applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06: • to ·permit a maximum lot coverage of 2·2 percent; whereas the by-law requires a . maximum lot coverage of 20 percent ( • to permit an accessory building with a maximum height of 4.2 metres in a residential zone; whereas the by-law requires· that no accessory building shall exceed a height of 3.5 metres in any residential zone • to recognize a minimum lot area of 1180.3 square metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 1390.0 square metres • to recognize a minimum front yard depth of 0.0 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard depth of 9.0 metres • to recognize a minimum exterior side yard depth of 0.0 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard depth of 4.5 metres The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain building· permits to construct an addition to the existing detached dwelling and to construct an accessory building (detached gar~ge). Recommendation . The City Development Department .considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: ' 1. That these variances apply only to the detached dwelling and accessory building (detached garage), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July 12, 2018, or this decision shall beconie null and void. · \ ~ 34 Report PICA 51/17 July 12, 2017 Page 2 Background The subject lands are currently used for residential purposes and supports two detached dwellings and an accessory structure. The existing detached dwelling fronting onto Brock Road appears to haye been constructed in the late 1800s ·and prior to Zoning By-law 3037 coming into effect. The dwelling is not recognized in the Claremont Buildings of Historical and Architectural Importance listing. The addition is proposed to extend the dwelling to the north and add a second storey to the east half of the existing building. The detached dwelling and accessory structure located on the east portion of the property do not appear to have any historical or architectural significance, and are proposed to be demolished. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan-"Rural Settlements-Oak Ridges Moraine Rural Hamlets" within the Hamlet of Claremont Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06-"ORM-R5"-Oak Ridges Morqine-'- Hamlet Residential Five Zone Appropriateness of the Application Lot Coverage Variance • the intent of the maximum lot coverage provision is to ensure that the size, scale and ·massing of a dwelling, and accessory buildings is appropriate for the lot size and to ensure an adequate amount of outdoor amenity space remains uncovered by buildings • the applicant has requested a variance to increase the maximum lot coverage from 20 percent to 22 percent • the increase in lot coverage will provide for the appropriate development of the land as · the size and massing of the proposed dwelling will be in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighbourhood • the proposed-development will maintain· a sufficient amount of outdoor amenity area that will remain uncovered and unobstructed on the lot • the requested variance to increase the maximum lot coverage by :two percent is minor in nature Accessory Building Height Variance • the intent of the maximum accessory building height of 3.5 metres in a residential zone is to minimize the visual impact that these structures may have on abutting properties and on the streetscape, and to further ensure that accessory buildings do not become the dominant buildings on residential properties Report PICA 51/17 July 12, 2017 35 Page3 • the proposed height of 4.2 metres for the accessory structure is an increase of 0.7 of a metre from the zoning by-law requirements of 3.5 metres • the proposed structure will have minimal impact on abutting properties as it will be located in the northeast corner· of the property, abutting the rear yard and accessory structures of the property to the north, and abutting the side yard of the Bell facility to the east · Lot Area, Front Yard Depth, and Exterior Side Yard Depth Variances • the general intent of performance standards in a zoning by-law is to ensure that individual properties maintain appropriate lot sizes, building height and massing and building setbacks that can appropriately site a dwelling and is complimentary with the · character of the surrounding neighbourhood • the property currently contains two detached dwellings; whereps the zoning by~law only permits one dwelling per lot · · • the existing dwelling fronting onto Brock Road, appears to have been constructed in its current location in the late 1800s; prior to Zoning By-law 3037 coming into effect • the applicant is proposing to demolish the dwelling to the east and build an addition onto the dwelling fronting onto Brock Road • the applicant is requesting variances to recognize the existing lot area, existing front yard depth and existing exterior side yard depth, in order to construct a second storey addition on top of the east half of the existing dwelling, and an addition extending the dwelling to the north .·- • the proposed addition is intended for residential purposes and the demolition of the dwelling to the east will bring the property more into conformity with the "ORM-R5 ... zone • the existing detached dwelling with the· proposed addition is in keeping with the residential character of the neighbourhood . Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintain the purpose and intent of th~ Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: July 6, 2017 Comme~;/y: ?~ Rory McNeil Planner I RM:Id J J:\Dacuments\Develapment\D-3700\2017\PCA 51-17\Report\PCA 51-17 Report.dacx Attachments • no comments on the application .Wd!f! Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review ...__ t ~ -- ,-- - ~ ~)'; 1/ -Yo ( ~& l p 01t0q/. I ANE r·l1 ~'I'> '----l -r-- v~ p ' /J SUBJECT, I 0 PROPERTYJ r. I , I ttl w cr: I I-~l-)/ I 1 I-.l(y XXX_. T ~ r -VIr V' :..- - v r-- r----... -E?i// . ~ . ~rr. --~~~­ P1CKER1NG City Development Department r-- r-- [L ~ -f-- --J: rl-om -r--\ill cr: ;---I-r-(/) -~ . (.)-:----.....,_ CENTRAL STREET cr: ~~c-OJ I- ,---__:__ WE~GTON STREET -0~ - I-~ -w w -O::r----cr: w ~-I- ~~ (/) 1---z 0 0 0 0:: I-0 OJ (/) (/) C9 z z () > :J fi u. I- ~ f-- r--t-- Ern w 0:: I-(/)1-- §I-- I- 1-- I - I Date: Jun. 22, 2017 SCALE: 1:5,000 PN-RU / to recognize a minimum front yard depth of 0.0 metres to recognize a minimum exterior side yard depth of 0.0 metres -(I) (I) .... -en .s::::: c. (I) (/) 0 J Brock Road ±25'-0" I I I I I 2.0m to recognize a minimum lot area of 1180.3 square metres .....-----J to permit a maximum lot coverage of 22 percent · ±13'-0" 1-----t==-=-~~~~~ I 1.2 m I I tbo p 1 de.rmit ~tnhacces~ory I u1 rng w1 a maxlmuml-~~~~~--"""""'""""'====:::::l~~i$!~==dl height of 4.2 metres in residential zone -~~~­ P1CKER1NG City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 51/17 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Part Lot 1 0 Plan 12 (5049 Brock Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. ' DATE: June 21, 2017 /FRONT ELEVATION FROM BROCK ROAD I / 1' -otp4 . PlCKERlNG City Development Department to permit an accessory building with a maximum height of 4.2 metres in residential zone 16' 0" X 7' 0" OVERHEAD DOOR FLUSH, 4 PANEL, STEEL 4.2m ~-t-------------24' ------------~.~ NORTH Submitted Plan . FILE No: P/CA 51/17_ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Part Lot 1 0 Plan 12 · (5049 Brock Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: June 21, 2017 -~~~­ P1CKER1N.G 39 Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Numbers: PICA 52117, PICA 53117 & PICA54117 Date: July 12, 2017 From: Subject: Applications Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review Committee of Adjustment Applications: · PICA 52117, PICA 53/17 & PICA 54/17 M. Casey 1307 Commerce Street PICA 52/17 (Proposed Lot 1 ), PICA 53117 (Proposed Lot 2) & PICA 54117 (Proposed Lot 3) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended: . . • to permit a minimum lot frontage of 12.0 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres • to permit a minimum lot area of 324 square metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 460 square metres • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 48 percent, whereas the by-law requires a maxirflum lot coverage of 33 percent • to permit a minimum side yard setback of 1.2 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres · • to permit a minimum front yard setback of 4.5 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 7.5 metres • to permit a covered platform to project a maximum of 1.8 metres into the required front yard, whereas the by-law permits uncovered ste.ps or pratforms not exceeding 1.0 metre ih height to project a maximum of 1·.5 metres into the required front yard · The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to facilitate the creation of a tot~ I of three ·lots through the Region of Durham Land Division Committee, and obtain building permits for the construction of three detached dwellings. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a minimum frontage of 12.0 metres, a minimum lot area of 324 square metres, a maximum lot coverage of 48 percent, a minimum side yard setback of 1.2 metres, a minimum front yard setback of 4.5 metres, and a maximum covered platform projection of 1.8 metres to be major variances that are not considered to be desirable . for the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Refusal of the proposed variances. ( 40 Report PICA 52117, PICA 53117 & PICA 54117 July 12, 2017 Page 2 Background Following the finalization of the Notice ofPublic.Hearing, which was mailed on June 28,'2017, City staff identified an additional variance is required to facilitate the applicant's proposal. A variance is required to permit a minimum lot area of 324 square metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 460 square metres: Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan :.... "Urban Residential Areas -Low Density Areas" within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood. · Zoning By-law 2511 -"R4" -Fourth Density Residential Zone Appropriateness of the Application Requested Variances for Proposed Lots 1, 2 & 3 '(PICA 52/17, P /CA 53/17 & PICA 54/17, respectively) • the applicant has requested variances to reduce the minimum lot frontage requirement from 15.0 metres to 12.0 metres and reduce the minimum lot area requirement from 460 square metres to 324 square metres in order to facilitate the creation of a total of three lots (proposed Lots 1, 2 & 3) for detached dwell_ings fronting onto Commerce Street • the applicant has also requested additional variances to reduce 'the minimum required side yard setback from 1 :5 metres to 1.2 metres, reduce the minimum front yard setback · from 7.5 metres to 4.5 metres, increase the maximum lot coverage from 33 percent to 48 percent, and permit a covered platform to project a maximum of 1.8 metres into the required front yard in ·order to construct new detached dwellings on three newly created · lots (see Submitted Plan, Attachment #2) • surrounding the subject property along Commerce Street, Broadview Street and the southerly east-west portion of Annland Street between Liverpool Road and Annland Street is an established neighbhourhood of older homes predominately consisting of ·bungalows and one-and-a-half storey dwellings • the existing lotting fabric and established building setbacks within the area generally consists of wide lots, deep front yard depths, wide· side yard widths, lower building heights and ample open space • existing lots containing detached dwellings within the immediate neighbourhood have lot frontages ranging between 15.0 metres and 30.0 metres (see Frontage Map, · Attachment #3) • existing lots within the immediate area meet the minimum required lot area of 460 square metres · Report PICA 52117, PICA 53117 & PICA54117 July 12, 2011 41 Page 3 • Section 13.1 0( c) of the Official Plan states that where new development is proposed within an .existing neighbourhood ,or an established area, City Council shall encourage designs that reinforce ar,d complement existing built patterns such as form, massing, height proportion, position relative to the street, and building area to site area ratios • the general intent of performance standards in a zoning by-law is to regulate development in order to ensure compatibility with the pattern of development in the area and to maintain the character of the neighbourhood • the proposed minimum lot frontage of 12.0 metres and minimum lot area of 324 square metres will result in three new lots that are significantly smaller than the established lots within the immediate area, particularly along Commerce Street between Liverpool Road and Annland Street • the requested front yard setback .of 4.5 metres will res~lt in the proposed dwellings to be sited considerably closer to the front lot line than existing dwellings along Commerce Street • ._ the average front yard setbacks along Commerce Street between Liverpool Road and Ann land Street are generally between 7.5 metres and 8.5 metres • the requested projection of 1.8 metres for a covered porch into the required front yard will further reduce the distance between the new dwellings and Commerce Street, and would facilitate the construction of a building approximately 2. 7 metres from the front lot line, whereas the current zoning by-law would permit a structure to be setback a minimum of 6.0 metres from the front lot line · · • the requested variance to increase the maximum lot coverage to 48 percent represents a.· 15 percent increase from the maximt,~m lot coverage of 33 percent, and is not considered minor in nature · · • the requested variances to reduce lot frontage and lot area will result in the creation of a · total of three new lots that will not maintain the established lotting pattern within the immediate neighbourhood, . . • the requested variances to reduce the front yard and side yard setbacks and increase the permitted lot coverage will result in the development of significantly sized dwellings on smaller lbts that would not be consistent with the established character and pattern of development and will not reinforce or complement the existing built form along · Commerce Street • the. requested variances are considered not to be. minor in nature, are not desirable for the appropriate development of the lands and do not meet the general intent and · purpose of Official Plan and the Zoning By-law 42 Report PICA 52117, PICA 53117 & PICA 54117 Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • no comments on the application Date of report: July 6, 2017 ~ Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review CM:Id J:\Documents\Development\D-370012017\PCA 52-17 to PCA 54-17\Report\PCA 52-17 to PCA 54-17 Report.doc Attachments July 12, 2017 Page4 I •, -~cf­ PJCKERJNG City Development Department Attachment# _._1 _ Location Ma File: P/CA52/17, P/CA53/17, & P/GA54/17 Lots 1, 2 & 3: to permit a maximum lot coverage of 48 oercent ~ ~ ./ i Lots 1, 2 & 3: to permit a minimum lot area of 323 square metres :; ( -r i ~~J,? I ~ I . : 11 , , Lots 1, 2 & 3: to permit a I ~ · '-1 1 \1 1 , 1 minimum side yard 1 ; !..." r: ('. J ""'' 11 j setback of 1.2 metres \ \ l.r ~ t . ,._ .,. !l:·rt'--l-'i ..... ·t · _... """""'---' "J:t,-· .......... w,;;.__--=-=--..;-i -~-I Lots 1, 2 & 3: to permit C! covered platform to project 1.8 metres into the required front yard Lots 1, 2 & 3: to permit a minimum front yard setback of 4.5 metres -·-O'tJoJ- PJCKERJNG City Development Department I 1-~ ; i 1 : : I j ll Lot d.. :.! t_or ~ · iT g.~ l P/CA 53/17 P/CA 54/17 ~ I I i P/CA52/17 ·"•"''!'\ .. ;· ~ . I ~ ~---~-r 1· l . f. 4_s: i~ ~~"¥"' : I -:. q .;~"J' 1 W) ~· i -l. r 1 .. · 12.0 m 12.0m Submitted Plan FILE No: PICA 52/17, P/CA 53/17 & P/CA 54/17 APPLICANT: M. Casey . · PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 10 & Part Lot 11, Plan 407 . (1307 Commerce Street) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. · Lots 1, 2 & 3: to permit a minimum lot frontage of ~ -~~~s ~ ~f'r~~ 12.0 m 1 DATE: June 20, 2017 13!)4 ~379 . r37 I r36 1367r365 r36r5T3~~ 135l 1135) 711 712 1.392 232 . 1230 712 1390 I' M1 I'( I WI GULL CROSSING 1388 ,,, , ... 709 710 138eMD H13 .. ., . -R4 710 " 1384 -82-17 \ 1376 1374 137 137( 136 1366 1364 362 36( 136 135 1354 1352 1350 '1382 HEWSON DRIVE 708 1380 ~ CfLtj ~t· PICKERING City Development Department 706 Frontage Map C1 715 706 704 R4 Iii File: PICA 52/17, w 702 1!: R4 1310 1318 1320 1322 1324 J:l 'A ......... en 0 -...... 2 709 SUBJECT 700 :5 1298 ~ 2 _DAo4"' ~ _, ''"T .• PROPERTY· 1326 1328 0 0 ... 696 0. 701 .. "' ·~ 18m 18m 1'8 ril . 18m 18m 18m PICA 53/17 & P/CA54/17 Applicant:M. Casey Property _, Descriptio~"): '' COMMERCE STREET Part Lot 11, 26m :X:x ~-36• m:&:x 18m 23m 25m .. 26m 15m 1tlm ·1tlm Lot 10 ~:g ~ 684 C1 695 1303 1311 1315 1319 1321 1325 1327 1329 1299 682 . Plan 407 Address: K.4 M A • Dllll"' ->. "T . ""'. 1307 Commerce St ()1 689 680 . 3 .. 1302 1304 1306 1308 1310 1312 1314 ·1316 1320 1324 1326 1328. ->. ()1 685 678 3 _iSm 1!im 1!im 1!im 1!i m 1iim 15m 25m 25m 15m 18m 1Bm Date: Jul. 05, 2017 SCALE: 1:1,000 . THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. R4 BROADVIEW STREET / ' 172 - @The Corporation of the City 9f Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: @ Queens Printer, Ontario Ministry · of Natural Rijsources. AU rights reserved.;©. Her Majesty the Queen In Right '1bm 15m 15m 15m 15m 15m 16m 15m 1om 15m 17m 18m 16m\ (A) 0 668 3 1303 ~ )68 675 1305 1307 1309 1311 1313 1315 1317 1319 1321 1323. 1327 1329 of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; · ©Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers all rights reserved.;© Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and Its suppliers all rights reserv~d.; . 0 12.5 25 50 Metres -\ I 1 I 1 I I I. I I - 166 Rd. _ .... '"" I. lVI I 164 6!)7 y -634· R~ I 636 638 640 . 642 644 646 648 650 652 654 656 658 660 662 - 660 663 .. wfj ;e -D) 0 . • • 13 =r 8· 3 (T) c.n 46 -~b~-Report to Committee of Adjustment P1CKER1NG From: Subject: ' . Applicatiqn Deborah-Wylie, MCIP, RPP Application Number: PICA 55117 & PICA 56117 Date: July 12, 2017 Principal Planner-Development Review Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 55117 & PICA 56117 J. Roche & J. Cusimano ·14 7 4 Rougemount Drive The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amende'd by By-law 2912188: • to permit a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres; whereas the by-,law permits a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres ·- • to permit a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling; whereas the by-law permits a minimum side yard width of 1 .8 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling I . The applicant requests ·approval of these minor variance applications in order to create one additional lot through the Region of Durham Land Division Committee and obtain a building permit to construct a two-storey detached dwelling on the proposed severed and retained parcels. · · Recommendations PICA 55117 & PICA 56117) .The.City Development Department considers the minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres and.a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development .of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore. recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed lot configuration, as generally sited and outlined as Part 1 and Part 2 on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain final clearance for Land Division Application (LD 1 04117) by July 17, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July 12, 2019 or this decision affecting the proposed detached dwellings shall become null and void. Report PICA 55117 & PICA 56117 . . 47 · July 12, 2017 Page 2 Background On October 11, 1988, the City approved an area-specific zoning by-law amendment for the · majority of the lands fronting onto Rougemount Drive, north of Kingston Road and east of Altona.Road. The amending by-law incorporated· specific zoning provisions to the existing "R3" and "R4" zones in order to protect the neighbourhood's unique character. These provisions included amendments to the front yard depth, building height, maximum garage projections and the placement of accessory structures on a lot. On February 26, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment conditionally approved previous Minor Variance applications (PICA 12/14 & PICA 13114) for the subject lands to·permit minimum lot . frontages of 15.0 metres and minimum side yard widths of 1.5 metres in order to create one additional lot through a future Land Division Application with the Region of Durham Land· Division Committee. · These applications became null and void on May 22, 2015 since the conditions of approval. were npt completed, and the owner failed to submit a Land Division Application with the Region of Durham Land Division Cqmmittee. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential -Low Density Areas" within the Rougemount Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2912188-"R3"-Third Density Residential Zone. Appropriateness of the Applications Reduced Lot Frontage and Side Yard Width Variances • the intent of the minimum lot frontage requirement is to en$ure a usable lot size that is compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood • the intent of a minimum side yard width is to provide an appropriate separation distance . between structures on abutting properties in order to ensure compatibility with the existing neighbourhood, provide appropriate pedestrian access between dwellings, and to accommodate grading, drainage and re.Sidential services such as air conditioning units and utility meters • since the adoption of the 1988 area-specific zoning by-law amendment, the City has approved several rezoning applications for a number of properties along Rougemount Drive between Kingston Road and Altonc;t Road establishing a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres 48 Report PICA 55117 & PICA 56117 July 12, 2017 Page3 • the proposed .reduced lot frontages of 15.2 metres and. side yard widths of 1.5 metres would ensure a usable lot size and allow for construction of detached dwellings that are compatible and in· keeping with the neighbourhood character established along Rougemount Drive • the proposed reduced side yard widths of 1.5 metres will provide appropriate separation distances between structures on abutting properties, maintain pedestrian access and . accommodate· grading, drainage and residential services such as air conditioning and utilities · • the requested variances to reduce the minimum lot frontage and side yard width are consistent with previous Committee of Adjustment approvals for the subject property • the requested variances are· minor in nature, desirable for the a'ppropriate development of the land, and maintain the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Engineering Services Date of report: July 5~ 2017 Comments prepared by: ffilitaParay, MCIP, RPP Planner I LP:Id • no comments on the application Debo~ah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review • J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2017\PCA 55-17 & PCA 56-17\Report\PCA 55-17 & PCA 56-17 Reporldoc Attachments ,. ft -r--J \ " ~· / ( ~ ~r PINEVIEW LANE I . ,---1--:--\\ 1--r--1--I--f ~ ~-v ...., ~II ("r" cii1T 1\~ ~ ' 9 ,r-r-\ . I \ I I I I I TWYN RIVERS DRIVE r--_ ----SHEPPARD AVENUE f \ Ill ~~~~ 1 ) ~ . ?(,\ . ... .i=-\-{\\ RICHARDSON STREET l \ 0,,\ l _I; \\\ I " \~ I II \ 0 ~ \ \ ~ ~ITTLEFORD STREET -~,~' r-.. :· ... -~~8 SUBJECT ~ :..£. -PROPERTY !---f----'--------, :"'-. 1---f-----'----J '-'--.. \ 1 -r--'----I \ \ \ -l \ \' I STOVER CRESCENT -\ I -\ I-----,\ I 0 -0 L %\ / I ~ -~ \J \\~ I HOOVER DRIVE r-I !i: (.__ w <( I \~ ....1 r-z f----::l I \...>.-t3 c..:____ 0 0 w \ \. \~ !:i h -f----(_) > I z ...--0:: / ~ <( (/) r-0:: 0 \t \ w 1-u: 1----....1 z H '--. 0 ::l / I 0 0 u:: 1\ ( I I I 2: . I w GWENDOLYN STREE-,j ~ (!) ...0 ::l 0 \ 0:: I \ \== \. \ ROUGE VALLEY DRIV :---.\ r--I r-- 1--~1 ~\ 1--0 /' -~ \\ ::(RlVERVlEW·CRESCE/1 r::::= ~ "\ 00 I \\ ----1 -f----:--1--<:>a ~ .... J J I I L \' --1 r----f----:--\. '--.. '------~t.; r----~ ROUGE HILL COURT <----f----L.J ~ -' Location Map -~4---. File: PICA 55117 & PICA 56117 P1CKER1NG Applicant:_J. Roche & J. Cusimano City Development Property Descriotion: Part Lot 1'5, Plan 228 Department (1474 Rougemount Drive) Date: Jun. 19, 2017 ~~~e Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (In part) under license from:@ Queens Printer, ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. SCALE: 1 :5,000 C ~~~~:eES:t~:~~s~~~.~~~~~ ~~~~~:~1\"ri~~~~r~~C~~~~~ ~e:=n~~ ~~:~~!::Ue~~~:!~~~nr:~J;;!~~ollers aU riahts rese'rVed,; TI-llS $ NOT PLAN OF SURVJ:V PN-RU PICA 55117 & PICA 56117: to permit a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres Rougemount Drive Proposed 2-Storey welling Submitted Plan Proposed 2-Storey Dwelling FILE No: PCA 55/17 & PCA 56/17 -Cd;;of- PJ(KERJNG APPLICANT: J. Roche & J. Cusimano PICA 55117 & PICA 56117: to permit a minimum side yard width. of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling City Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Part Lot 15, Plan 228 (1474 Rougemount Drive) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. bATE: June 21, 2017 -Cdff~f­ PlCKERlNG From: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP . 51 Report to Committee o"f Adjustment Application Number: PICA 57/17 Date: July 12, 2017 Principal Planner-Development Review Subject: Application Commi~tee of Adjustment Application PICA 57/17 W. Ayub 1135 Ridgewood Court The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2864/88: • to permit a minimum rear yard depth of 4.9 metres to a proposed sun room addition; whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 44 percent; whereas the by-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent The applicant requests approval of these variances. in order to obtain a building permit to construct a second storey addition (sunroom) and associated steps in the rear yard. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a minimum rear yard depth of 4.9 metres and a maximum lot coverage of 44 percent, to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpos~ of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, . subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed second storey sun room addition and associated steps, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans .. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by July 12, 2019, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential -Low Density Areas" within the Liverpool Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2864/88 -'S3', Single Residential Zone 52 Report PICA 57/17 July 12, 2017 Page 2 Appropriateness of the Application Rear Yard Depth Variance • the intent of the minimum rear yard depth is to ensu're adequate amenity space is provided within the rea·r yard, appropriate setbacks are provided to protect the privacy of abutting property owners and allow appropriate access for maintenance, lot grading and drainage · · · • the by-law requires a minimum rear. yard depth of 7.5 metres • the applicant has requested a minimum rear yard depth of 4.9 metres to facilitate the construction of a .15.6 square metre sunroom addition with associated steps • there is an existing second sto-rey uncovered balcony projecting into· the rear yard whi~h 'will be removed to accommodate the. proposed sunroom addition . • abutting properties to the north -and south also have similar s,econd storey uncovered balcony structures projecting into the rear yards • the subject property abuts a City Park (Kitley Ravine) to the east . • . the proposed sunroom addition and associated steps will maintain an ·appropriate amount of usable amenity space left uncovered by buildings in the rear yard · • tre proposed variance will have minimal impact on the privacy of abutting properties as a 1.8 metre wooden fence and mature trees and vegetation surround the perimeter of the subject property, mitigating potential. impacts of the sunroom addition on neighbo'uring properties • the requested variance is minor in nalure, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning ·By-law· Maximum Lot Coverage Variance I, • the intent of the maximum lot coverage provision is to ensure that the size, scale and massing of a dwelling, and accessory buildings is appropriate for the lot size and to ensure an adequate amount of outdoor amenity area remains uncove~ed by buildings • the by-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent • the applicant has requested a variance to increase the maximum lot coverage to 44 percent to recognize ttie existing dwelling and accessory building (shed), and to allow for the construction of sunroom addition if\ the rear yard • based on the as:-built construction survey, the existing dwelling has a maximum lot coverage of 38.97 percent of the lot area · • the combined proposed maximum lot coverage (existing shed and dwelling, and proposed·sunroom) is 44 percent of the lot area • there is an existing 1.8 metre wood privacy fence and mature trees to minimize the · visual impact in the rear yards of the abutting properties • the increase in lot coverage will provide for the appropriate development of the land as the size and massing of the proposed dwelling will be in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighbourhood • · the proposed development will maintain a sufficient amoun.t of outdoor amenity area ,that will remain uncovered· by buildings ( Report PICA 57/17 July 12, 2017 53 Page 3 • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable .for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Engineering Services • no comments on the application Toronto Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) · • no objection to the minor variance applications Date of report: JLJIY 5, 2017 · Comments prepared by: ~itc;1Pa~ay, MCIP, RPP Planner 1. LP:Id. J:\Documents\Deve\opmenftD-3700\2017\PCA 57-17\Report\PCA 57-17 Report. doc Attachments • a TRCA Permit is required at the Building Permit stage Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP. Principal Planner-Development Review -04;()f-·· P1CKER1NG City Development Department 1----'---1----'--- f--- 1-f--- f--- f--- Date: Jun. 19, 2017 PN-RU to permit a minimum rear yard depth of 4.9 metres City Development Department to permit a maximum coverage of 44 percent 2 (/) II Ridgewood Court Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 57/17 APPLICANT: ·w. A ub PROPERTY DESC.RIPTION: Lot 54, Plan 40M1607· (1135 Ridgewood Court} ' FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: June 21, 2017 .6 -~~i·­ PlCKERlNG City Development Department [[] [[] ITl SOUTH ELEVATION Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 57/17 APPLICANT: W. A ub PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 54, Plan 40M1607 (1135.Ridgewood Court) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. . DATE: June 21, 2017