Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSeptember 12, 1966 MUNICIPAL BUILDING BROUGHAM A meeting of Pickering Township Council was held on MONDAY the 'lWELVTH day of SEPTEMBER, 1966, at EIGHT o'clock p. m. ~ PRESENT: Reeve C. W. Laycox Deputy Reeve Mrs. J. L. McPherson Councillors: Harvey Spang Donald Beer Ronald Chatten John Williams John Campbell D. J. PIitz, Clerk The following PERSONS, on MOTION, were heard: 1. MOVED by Deputy Reeve J. L. McPherson, seconded by Councillor Donald Beer that Mr. S. Rumm, representing Consolidated Building corporation be heard. The subjects under discussion were the Subdivision agreements pertain~ to Block HZ, Plam M-13, and Block P, Plan M-12, The Township of Piakering. Reeve C. W. Layeox opened the discussion by refering to the minute. of the Public Utility committee mee~ing held on September 7th, 1966. The minutes outlined suggestiea~ and recOllll1endatiøns made 1).y. ~his comoaittee, these were reviewe«i 'by COUJ\c il item by item. (1) Paragraph 1, Clause "3", of the agreement for Block HZ, pian M';'13, and Block P of Plan M-12 to read, lithe subdivider agrees to keep the streeës clear at ¡tIt times of builders debris, mud etc. until the streets a~e assumed by the Township. The Township ag"es to snow plow and sand all streets after consturction of same and that this act will not constitute acceptance of thes~ streets by the municipality". ~ (2) Paragraph 1, Section 11, Subsection iii - Mr. Rumm discussed with Council, paragraph 1, Section 11, Subsection iii, with respect to roof drainage and foundation weeper tiles re: connection of same to the storm laterals. This Mr. Rumm indicÇlted.. would result in additional cost to each building of between $350 and $400, and also that this is not necessary since the land is so located and existing contours provide natural drainage to the creek bed to the rear. Mr. Rumm did agree, however to the instalation of eavestroughing on all new homes to be erected in these plans. See Resolution 368 - Blk HZ, Plan M-13 See Resolution 372 - Blk P , Plan M-12 -2- The Engineer be requested to give his recommendations as to the necessity of the roof drainage being connected to the storm lateral. Should the Township require this from the subdivider? ~ (3) Paragraph 1, Section 11, Subsectj9P~iv) and (v), were discussed. €sjU" .111 ífllÅ1amBrst(g~ested and it was agreed that the wording in Subsection (iv) "if possible and economically feasible" be deleted, in further discussion the Counc i1 agreed that all of subs'3ctions (iv) and (v) be deleted and substituted or amended to read as follows: "storm outfal1s to discharge into existing water courses in a manner satisfactory to the Township Engineer". (4) Paragraph 1, Section 11, Subsection (vi) and (vii) were /{) discussed at considerable length. OT 1..-:01... VJ111.~)7 1..)' c - asked t:hat sidewalks on both sides of the streets be installed. Mr. RUIIIIl was in agreement to building t:he roads to a width of 28 feet frca curb to curb, however he was not in agreement to building sidewalks on both sides of the street. See reso1utions369 and 371. (5) paragraph 12 of Block HZ, Plan M-13, and paraqraph 8, of Block P, Plan M-12, were discussed with the followinq recommendations: Line four of respective paragraphs - The word "Clerk" . be deleted and substituted by "Council". The amount of the Performance and Maintenance Bonds were considered. Mr. Runm estimated that the total. cost of services in both Plans would amount to approximately $150,000.00. Council recommended that the amount of the Bonds should be 50% of this total. The description of each Plan - BIk. HZ, Plan M-l3 and Blk. P, Plan M-12, should be explained and attached to each agreement. Paragraph 13 of the aqreement for Plan B1k HZ, Plan M-13 AND Paragraph 9 of the agreement for Plan Blk P, Plan M-l2 to be Clerks instructions. þ (6) Mr. Rumm objected to the fee of 30% in the agreement, and he feels he should not be charged this dislocation fee. He felt if his company was found to be negligent that perhaps he would go along with this charge, but otherwise the fee was not a fair one. The Council agreed that this should remain in the agreement but indicated that should the accassion arise, when this charge could be applied, they would consider all aspects of the incident. -3- ~ (7) On the matter of debris on the proposed sites for Bl~. HZ, M-13, Blk P, M-12. Mr. Rumm felt that since this debris is not caused by the developer, but rather by the resident ratepayers, that his company should not be responsible for removing same. He went on to say that if the Township was to clear away the existing debris that his company would keep the area free of further debris until the Plans of subdivision are assumed by the municipality. (8) Paragraph 1, Section 7, Subsection iii, the matter of sidewalks on both sides of Helen Crescent was not agree- able to Mr. Rumm, however he did not object to side- walks on one side of this street. RESOLUTIONS Resolution 368 MOVED by Deputy Reeve J. L. McPherson, seconded by Councillor H. Spang that this draft subdivision agreement Blk HZ, Plan M-13: Paragraph 1. Subsection iii, be rewritten to delete Roof drainage in to storm sewers. Yea: Beer, Spang, McPherson, Laycox Nay: Chatten, Campbell, Williams CARRIED . Resolution 369 MOVED by councillor J. Campbell, Seconded by Councillor J. Williams, that Item 11, Subsection vi, be amended to include "with sidewalks constructed on both sides on all roads and that this be in addition to the 41, 000 ~ . feet already stipulated in the original agreement" ~ and this is in accordance with the draft subdivision agreement 1966, and that item vii be deleted. Yea: Chatten, Campbell, Williams Nay: Beer, Spang, McPherson, Laycox LOST Resolution 370 MOVED by Councillor D. Beer, seconded by Deputy Reeve J. L. McPherson, that this Council accept the draft subdivision agreement of Block HZ, Plan M-13, as amended and subject to the approval of the Township Engineer, and the Township Solicitor. Draft agreement to be re-drawn. Yea: Beer, Spang, McPherson, Laycox Nay: Chatten, Campbell, Williams CARRIED . -4- Resolution 371 ~ MOVED by Councillor J. Campbell, seconded by Councillor R. Chatten, re: draft subdivision agreement, Block P, Plan M-12, that section 7, subsection iii~ be amended· to include "sidewalks to be laid on both sides of Helen Crescent.. this to be in addition to the original 41,000 feet in the original subdivision agreement. f Yea: Nay: Chatten~ Campbell, Williams Beer, Spang, McPherson, Laycox LOST. Resolution 372 ~ MOVED by couni'llor H. Spang, seconded by Councillor D. Beer, that1re: draft subdivision agreement, B1k. P, Plan M-¥l'í~ that Section 7, subsection iv, be rewritten to delete Roof drainage into strom sewers. Yea: Nay: Beer, Spang, McPherson, Laycox Chatten, Campbell, Williams CARRIED. Resolution 373 MOVED by Councillor H. Spang, seconded by Councillor D. Beer, that this Council approves the draft subdivision agreement of Block P~ Plan M-12~ as amended, subject to the approval of the Township Engineer and the Township Solicitor - draft agreement to be re-drawn. Yea: Nay: Beer, Spang~ McPherson, Laycox Campbell, Williams, (Chatten absent) CARRIED . MOVED by Councillor Wi11iams~ seconded by Councillor Chatten that Mr. D. Kitchen - President of the Bay Ridges Ratepayer's Association be heard. Mr. Kitchen read from a prepared brief with respect to the re-distribution of Pickering Township's Ward Boundaries. Mr. Kitchen submitted to Council a petition signed by at least 200 electors of this Township. See Resolution 13, Subsection 3, Chapter 249, The Municipal Act. MOVED by Deputy Reeve, J. L. McPherson, seconded by Councillor D. Beer that this meeting do now adjourn 11:10 olc1ock p. m., September 12, 1966, to meet again at 8 o'c1ock p. m., September 13, 1966. ~ ~Ô '-- APPROVED ð!t.t· 3, 1966