HomeMy WebLinkAboutApril 20, 2016Committee of Adjustment
Agenda
Meeting Number: 5
Date: Wednesday, April 20, 2016
(I)
(II)
(Ill)
(IV)
Adoption of Agenda
Adoption of Minutes from March 30, 2016
Reports
Committee of Adjustment
Agenda
Wednesday, April20, 2016
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
Page Number
1-8
1. (Deferred at the March 30, 2016 meeting) 9-12
PICA 15116
A. Sparks
1885 Spruce Hill Road
2. (Deferred at the March 30, 2016 meeting) 13-16
PICA 16116
S. & H. Sparks
1891 Spruce Hill Road
3. PICA 40115 17-22
Enbo Properties Inc.
1625 Feldspar Court
4. PICA 21116 & PICA 22116 23-26
Mattamy (Seaton) Limited
Lot 69 on Draft Approved Plan of
Subdivision SP-2009-13
5. PICA 22/16 27-30
Matta my (Seaton) Limited
Block 94, Unit 8 on Draft Approved Plan of
Subdivision SP-2009-13
Adjournment
Accessible •--For information related to accessibility requirements please contact:
Lesley Dunne PICKE~G T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024
TTY 905.420.1739
Email ldunne@pickering.ca
Pending Adoption
Present
Tom Copeland-Vice-Chair
David Johnson -Chair
Eric Newton
Denise Rundle
Also Present
Melissa Markham, Secretary-Treasurer
Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
Absent
Sean Wiley
(I) Adoption of Agenda
Moved by David Johnson
Seconded by Eric Newton
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, March 30, 2016
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
That the agenda for the Wednesday, March 30, 2016 meeting be'adopted.
(II) Adoption of Minutes
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by David Johnson
Carried Unanimously
That the minutes of the 3rd meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held
Wednesday, March 9, 2016 be adopted.
Carried Unanimously
Page 1 of 8
1
2 Committee of Adjustment
(Ill) Reports
1. P/CA14/16
Louisville Homes Limited
1820 Fairport Road
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, March 30, 2016
· · 7:00pm
Main Committee Room
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law
7378/14, to permit a maximum garage projection of9.8 metres beyond the wall
containing the main entrance to the dwelling unit; whereas the by-law permits a
maximum garage projection of 2.0 metres beyond the wall containing the main
entrance to the dwelling unit. .
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to
obtain a building permit to construct a two-storey detached dwelling with an
attached three-car garage·projecting into the front yard.
The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City
Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written
comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works
Department expressing no concerns.
Amanda Lazaridis, owner, was present to represent the application. No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. ·
Moved by Denise Rundle
Seconded by Eric Newton
That application PICA 14/16 by Louisville Homes Limited, be Approved on the
grounds that the maximum garage projection of 9.8 metres beyond the wall
containing the main entrance to the dwelling unit is minor in nature, desirable for
the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent
and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following
conditions:
1 . That this variance apply only to the proposed detached dwelling, as generally
sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
March 30, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
Page 2 of 8
2. PICA 15116
A. Sparks
1885 Spruce Hill Road
3. PICA 16116
S. & H. Sparks
1891 Spruce Hill Road
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday., March 30, 2016
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
The applicants request relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit
a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres, and a maximum lot coverage of
38 percent; whereas the by-law permits a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres,
and a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent.
The applicants request approval of these minor variance applications in order to
obtain a building permit to construct a two-storey detached dwelling on the
proposed severed parcels (fronting Grayabbey Court) which will be created
through Land Division applications LD 029116 and LD 030116.
The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City
Development Department recommending deferral. Written comments were also
received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no
concerns.
Amanda Lazaridis, agent, was present to represent the applications. Michael
Mahoney of 1813 Grayabbey Court and David Vieira of 1804 Grayabbey Court
were present in objection to the applications. Jamie Holbrook of 1809 Grayabbey
Court was present to obtain additional information on the applications.
Michael Mahoney expressed a concern that the requested variances are not in
keeping with the surrounding neighbourhood and the increase in lot coverage
was not appropriate for the development of the land.
Jamie Holbrook was seeking additional information on the site design. Jamie
Holbrook stated he would like to see the proposed houses in keeping with the
surrounding neighbourhood.
David Vieira questioned the size and depth of the proposed lots and where the
driveways would be located. ·
In response to a suggestion from a Committee Member, Amanda Lazaridis
indicated she would contact the concerned residents and provide additional
information on the applications prior to the next committee meeting.
Page 3 of 8
3
4 Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, March 30, 2016
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
In response to a question from a Committee Member, the Secretary-Treasurer
stated that the related Land Division applications for these two minor variance
applications have been received and are currently being reviewed by the City
staff.
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by David Johnson
That applications PICA 15116 by A. Sparks, and PICA 16116 by S. & H. Sparks
be Deferred in order to allow staff to· review the concurrent Land Division
applications and for the applicant to provide conceptual building elevations and
floor plans.
4. PICA 17116
N. Ganeshan
343 Finch Avenue
Carried Unanimously
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a
minimum east side yard width of 1.5 metres; whereas the by-law requires a
minimum side yard width of 3.0 metres.
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to
construct an addition to an existing detached dwelling for an attached garage.
The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City
Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written
comments were received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department
indicating all water must be contained on the applicant's property, and not
negatively affect the property to the east. Written comments were also received
from the Durham Region Environmental Health Division indicating a site plan
indicating the location of the private sewage system (tank and leaching bed), all
structures, wells(s) and any bodies of water and all clearance distances from the
above mentioned attributes will be required through the building permit process.
Nareshkumar Ganeshan, owner, was present to represent the application. No
further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
Page 4 of 8
Moved by Denise Rundle
Seconded by Eric Newton
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, March 30, 2016
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
That application PICA 17116 by N. Ganeshan, be Approved on the grounds that
the minimum east side yard width of 1.5 metres to a proposed attached garage is
minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in
keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning
By-law, subject to the following conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the proposed addition, as generally sited and
outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
March 30, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void.
5. PICA 18116
P. & M. Buerschaper
4 7 4 Rose bank Road
Carried Unanimously
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended, to permit a
minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres where a garage is erected as part of a
detached dwelling, and a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent; whereas the by-law
permits a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as
part of a detached dwelling, and a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent.
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to
obtain a building permit to construct a one-storey detached dwelling on the
proposed severed parcel (fronting Pike Court) which will be created through Land
Division application LD 135115.
The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City
Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written
comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works
Department expressing no concerns.
\
Peter & Margaret Buerschaper, owners and John Perciasepe, agent, were
present to represent the application. No further representation was present in
favour of or in objection to the application.
In response to a question from a Committee Member, the Secretary-Treasurer
stated the proposed dwelling is a one-storey bungalow.
Page 5 of 8
5
6
Moved by Denise Rundle
Seconded by David Johnson
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, March 30, 2016
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
That application PICA 18116 by P. & M. Buerschaper, be Approved on the
grounds that the minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres, and a maximum lot
coverage of 38 percent are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate
· development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and. purpose of
the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed detached dwelling on the
proposed severed parcel (fronting Pike Court) as generally sited and outlined
on the applicant's submitted plans, including elevation drawings.
2. That the applicant obtain final clearance for Land Division Application
LD 135115, or this decision shall become null and void.
3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
March 30, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. ·
6. PICA 19116
R. & 0. Slobojan
1975 Lodge Road
Carried Unanimously
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law
230175 to permit a private garage setback not less than 4.6 metres from a
streetline, whereas the by-law states that each dwelling shall have at least one
private garage setback not less than 6.0 metres from a street.
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to
obtain a building permit to construct an addition to an existing two-storey
detached dwelling.
The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City
Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written
comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works
Department expressing no concerns.
Ryan Slobojan, owner, was present to represent the application. No further
representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. ·
Page 6 of 8
Moved by Eric Newton
Seconded by David Johnson
----------------------------
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, March 30, 2016
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
That application PICA 19116 by R. & 0. Slobojan, be Approved on the grounds
that the private garage setback 4.6 metres from a streetline is minor in nature,
desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the
general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to
the follovying conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the proposed addition, as generally sited and
outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
March 30, 2017 or this decision shall become null and void.
7. PICA 20116
B. & L. Woodbine
305 Toynevale Road
Carried Unanimously
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended to permit
uncovered steps and a platform (deck) to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into
the required rear yard, whereas the by-law does not permit uncovered steps or
platforms to project into the required rear yard.
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to
obtain a building permit to construct a deck in the rear yard.
The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City
Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written
comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works
Departr:nent expressing no concerns.
Brad & Lea Woodbine, owners, were present to represent the application. No
further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application.
Moved by Denise Rundle
Seconded by David Johnson
That application PICA 20116 by B. & L. Woodbine, be Approved on the grounds
that the uncovered steps and a platform (deck) to project a maximum of 1.5 metres
into the required rear yard, are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate
development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of
the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions:
Page 7 of 8
7
8 Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, March 30, 2016
7:00pm
Main Committee Room
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed uncovered steps and deck,
as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
March 30, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
(IV) Adjournment
Date
Moved by David Johnson
Seconded by Eric Newton
That the 4th meeting of the 2016 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at
7:35 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on
Wednesday, April 20, 2016.
Carried Unanimously
Vice-Chair
Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
Page 8 of 8
From:
Subject:
Application
Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number: PICA 15116
Meeting Date: April 20, 2016
(Deferred at the March 30, 2016 meeting)
Principal Planner-Development Review
Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 15116
A. Sparks
1885 Spruce Hill Road
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a
minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres, and a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent;
whereas the by-law permits a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres, and a maximum
lot coverage of 33 percent.
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a
building permit to construct a two-storey detached dwelling on the proposed severed
parcel (fronting Grayabbey Court) which will be created through Land Division
application LD 029116.
Recommendation
The City Development Department recommends that minor variance application
PICA 15116 be Tabled, at the request of the applicant, in order to allow the applicant to
provide conceptual building elevations and floor plans.
Background
At the March 30, 2016 Committee of Adjustment meeting, City staff recommended that
this application be deferred in order to review the proposed variances in conjunction
with conceptual building elevations and floor plans and the concurrent Land Division
application. At this time staff have reviewed the concurrent Land Division application
LD 029116, however conceptual building elevations and floor plans have not been
submitted.
The applicant has requested that the minor variance application be tabled in order to
provide conceptual building elevations and floor plans for the proposed dwelling.
Comment
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan -Urban Residential Areas -Low Density Areas within the
Dunbarton Neighbourhood.
Zoning By-law 3036, as amended -"R4", Fourth Density Residential Zone
9
10 Report PICA 15/16
Date of report: April 13, 2016
Comments prepared by:
~~
Lalita Para:ZP. RPP
Planner I
LP:MM:Id
April20, 2016
Page 2
21Mr:1~~p
Principal Planner-Development Review
J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2016\PCA 15-16 Audrey Sparks\Report\PCA 15-16_tab/ed.doc
Enclosures
City Development
Department
McPHERSON
PARK
Location Map
1----+---lt:j 1------------1
1----+---1:::>
~--~----~~r---~~------~--------1
1----+-~~~--~~ho------+-------~
lr--1------l 0:: lr---t-~
t---+----il=! 1----t-~
1'---+-----'1~1'-....-'-----l
::2:
FILE No:P/CA 15/16
APPLICANT: A. Sparks
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:RCP Lot 72, Plan 1041 (1885 Spruce Hill Road)
DATE: Mar. 6, 2016
SCALE 1:5000 PN-7
11
_..
--
N-to permit a minimum side yard width of 1 .2 metres E I N
l
I
IT
-
11 I
:
-.
51
.
3
m
38
.
1
m
r-
;
-l t h
.
~
I
0
(/
)
·I
I I ~
<(
UJ
0
0::
1:
I ~I ::::>
0:
:
AR
E
A
TO
Om
I-
0
E
-
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
BE
RE
T
A
I
N
E
D
O
w
,
U
J
I
I ()
...
.
.
J
00
DW
E
L
L
L
I
N
G
E
o:
:
.
-
~
~I
..
.
J
PA
R
C
E
L
1-
A
1-
w
.
.
.
J
w
>-
N
-
0>
<C
>
U
J
-
I
I w·
I
N
11
7
6
SQ
U
A
R
E
ME
T
R
E
S
N
UJ
U
J
(
)
o
:
:
PROPOSED I
0:
:
(
J
)
O
:
:
<
(
I
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
ENVELOPE I . : co
w
N
<C
w
-
;
:
t
:
§
co
(
)
mo
.
:
(f
)
~-~~ +~J I <(
:::
:
>
I
~~
J
.
-
.
.
->-
0:
:
1.
0
I
1'-
-
w
n..
00
I 0::
Cl
)
~
t·
38
.
1
m
(!)
..
51
.
3
m
.
I
(1~.r I _E .. N'
I
T"" I
to
pe
r
m
i
t
a
ma
x
i
m
u
m
lo
t
·I
co
v
e
r
a
g
e
of
38
pe
r
c
e
n
t
~
1
~4
~
Su
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
Pl
a
n
FI
L
E
No
:
P/
C
A
15
/
1
6
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:
A.
Sp
a
r
k
s
~
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
:
RC
P
Lo
t
72
,
Pl
a
n
10
4
1
(1
8
8
5
Sp
r
u
c
e
Hi
l
l
Road)
Ci
t
y
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
_
FU
L
L
SC
A
L
E
CO
P
I
E
S
OF
TH
I
S
PL
A
N
AR
E
AV
A
I
L
A
B
L
E
FO
R
VI
E
W
I
N
G
AT
TH
E
CI
T
Y
OF
PI
C
K
E
R
I
N
G
) DATE: Mar. 6, 2016
-C
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
.
From:
Subject:
Application
Melis$a Markham, MCIP, RPP
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number: PICA 16116
Meeting Date: April 20, 2016
(Deferred at the March 30, 2016 meeting)
'
Principal Planner-Development Review
Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 16116
S. & H. Sparks
1891 Spruce Hill Road
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a
minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres, and a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent;
whereas the by-law permits a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres, and a maximum
lot coverage of 33 percent.
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a
building permit to construct a two-storey detached dwelling on the proposed severed
parcel (fronting Grayabbey Court) which will be created through Land Division
application LD 030116.
Recommendation
The City Development Department recommends that minor variance application
PICA 16116 be Tabled, at the request of the applicant, in order to allow the applicant to
provide conceptual building elevations and floor plans.
Background
At the March 30, 2016 Committee of Adjustment meeting, City staff recommended that
this application be deferred in order to review the proposed variances in conjunction
with conceptual building elevations and floor plans and the concurrent Land Division
application. At this time staff have reviewed the concurrent Land Division application
LD 030116, however conceptual building elevations and floor plans have not been
submitted.
The applicant has requested that the minor variance application be tabled in order to
provide conceptual building elevations and floor plans for the proposed dwelling.
Comment
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan -Urban Residential Areas -Low Density Areas within the
Dunbarton Neighbourhood.
Zoning By-law 3036, as amended-"R4", Fourth Density Residential Zone
13
14 Report PICA 16/16
Date of report: April 13, 2016
Comments prepared by:
c/~.
Lalita Paray, M&;P, RPP
Planner I
LP:MM:Id
J:\Documents\Oevefopment\0-3700\2016\PCA 16-16\Report\PCA 16-16_ Tabled.doc
Endosures . ·
April20, 2016
Page2
Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner-Development Review
U') .--' 0 ~ 0:: _J _J I w () ·~ a.. en ."" 15.1 ' E co c-.i C'\1 City Development Department
to
pe
r
m
i
t
a
mi
.
ya
r
d
wi
d
t
h
of
~~~
u
m
si
d
e
E
C'\1
51
.
3
m
1
.EXISTfNG
AR
E
A
TO
AB
O
V
E
G
R
W
N
D
I~~~
-
I
•-
-
>
B
.
1m
-
8
T-
,
DWELLLING
BE
RE
T
A
I
N
E
D
.
PO
O
L
117
2
.P
A
R
C
E
L
1-
A
Sl
I
~
I
SQ
U
A
R
E
ME
T
R
E
S
.
a:
I
C
l
c
a
l
-
I
o
w
,
w
I
r-
a
:
...
.
.
~
I
<(
U
J
.
.
.
J
w
co
w
il
i
~ "'
I
PR
O
P
O
S
l
.....
·~ rJ
)
a:
:3
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
EN~L
O
P
E
I
w
8
:
a
I
co
rJ
)
.
ff
l
I
I
co
-
·
-
T
-
-
'·
.
~ -
.J
51
.
3
m
~:U
~
1m
..
~t
to
pe
r
m
i
t
a
ma
x
i
m
co
v
e
r
a
g
e
of
38
um
lo
t
pe
r
c
e
n
t
Submitted Pla
n
FILE No: P/CA
16
/
1
6
APPUCANT:S
.
&
H.
Sp
a
r
k
s
PROPERTY DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
:
RC
P
Lo
t
73
,
Pl
a
n
10
4
1
(1
9
9
1
Sp
r
u
c
e
Hi
l
l
Ro
a
d
)
FULL SCALE COPIES OF TH
I
S
PL
A
N
AR
E
AV
A
I
L
A
B
L
E
FO
R
VI
E
W
I
N
G
AT
TH
E
CI
T
Y
OF
PI
C
K
E
R
I
N
G
CI1Y DEVELOPMENT DEPAR
T
M
E
N
T
.
·
me
t
r
e
s
1 I
E
I
-.
:
:
t
~I
I I I I . 1'
DA
T
E
:
Ma
r
.
6,
.
2
0
1
6
16
a.,a~-L «me
City Development
Department
McPHERSON
PARK
· Location Map
TAPLIN
f----+----lt:jf-------1
f----+----1:::::> r-~--~~~-~~r..------~------~
f---+--~m~--~~~------+-------~
~-+--~~r-_,-~ ~-+--~~r-~-~
~-+--~~~~-~
~
FILE No:P/CA 16/16
APPLICANT: S. & H. Sparks
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:RCP Lot 73, Plan 1041 (1991 Spruce Hill Road)
DATE: Mar. 6, 2016
SCALE 1:5000 PN-7
From:
Subject:
Application
Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number: PICA 40115
Meeting Date: April 20, 2016
Principal Planner-Development Review
Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 40115
Enbo Properties Inc.
1625 Feldspar Court
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended:
• to permit an accessory structure in the south side yard; whereas the by-law
states that all accessory buildings which are not part of the main building shall be
erected in the rear yard
• to permit side yard parking no closer than 0.5 of a metre from the north side lot
line and 1.3 metres from the south side lot line; whereas the by-law states that
side yard parking shall be permitted no closer than 7.5 metres from the side lot
line on one side and 1.5 metres on the other side .
• to permit a perpendicular width of a drive aisle used to gain access to a parking
stall to be a minimum of 6.0 metres for two-way traffic; whereas the by-law states
that the perpendicular width of a drive aisle used to gain access to a parking stall
shall be 6.5 metres for two-way traffic
• to permit front yard parking to be limited to 26 percent of the total required
parking area; whereas the by-law states that front yard parking shall be limited to
20 percent of the total required parking area
The applicant has requested approval of these variances in order to permit a 131 square
metre accessory structure (sandblast hut) within the south side yard and to permit
variances for on-site parking requirements.
Recommendation
The City Development Department considers an accessory structure in the south side
yard, side yard parking no closer than 0.5 of a metre from the north side lot line and
1.3 metres from the south side lot line, a perpendicular width of a drive aisle used to
gain access to a parking stall to be a minimum of 6.0 metres for two-way traffic, and
front yard parking to be limited to 26 percent of the total required parking area, to be
minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping
with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and
therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following
conditions:
17
18 Report PICA 40/15 April20, 2016
Page2
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed accessory structure and parking
areas, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain Site Plan Approval and building permits for the proposed
construction by April 20, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void.
Comment
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan -Employment Areas -General Employment Area in the Brock
Industrial Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 2511, as amended-"M2" -Industrial Zone
Appropriateness of the Application
Accessory Structure in Side Yard Variance
• the intent of requiring accessory buildings and structures to be located in the rear
yard is to minimize their visual impact on the streetscape, and to ensure that they
act as accessory to the principal use of the property
• the by-law requires accessory buildings and structures which are not part of the
main building to be erected in the rear yard
• the applicant is requesting a variance to reconstruct an accessory structure in the
south side yard of an existing manufacturing building
• the applicant has stated that the existing accessory structure was erected in 2012
• the accessory structure is currently used for sand blasting of products, which is
an accessory use on the property
• the drive aisle around the building is not identified as a fire route, and therefore
the location of the accessory structure does not have any impact on emergency
services
• ·the location of the accessory structure does not have any negative visual impact
on the streetscape and the structure is in keeping with the industrial character of
the street
• the accessory structure complies with all other requirements of the Zoning By-law
• the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate
development of the land and maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan
and the Zoning By-law
Recognize Existing Parking and Drive Aisle Width Variances
• the intent of the City's parking and drive aisle width requirements is to ensure
that all properties provide the required amount of parking for employees in a safe
manner and have minimal impact on adjacent properties
• the requested variances related to parking and drive aisle widths are required
due to the existing development on the subject lands ·
Report PICA 40/15 April 20, 2016
Page 3
• City staff met with the applicant and owner to revise the existing parking on the
site, to minimize the variances that are required, and the proposed variances are
the outcome of these discussions
• the applicant is requesting that the existing setback to parking be recognized at
0.5 of a metre from the north side lot line and 1.3 metres from the south side lot
line; the minimum drive aisle be reduced to 6.0 metres; and, that front yard
parking to be limited to 26 percent of the total required parking area
• the proposed setbacks to the parking on the site is an existing condition
• the requested variance to permit a 6.0 metre drive aisle width for two-way traffic
is an improvement from the existing layout of parking spaces on the site and is
acceptable for the continuance of the industrial use on the lands
• the variance to permit front yard parking to be 26 percent of the total required
parking area would allow for a total of 13 parking spaces in the front yard, where
a total of 10 is currently permitted
• parking layout in the front of the building has been improved to maintain required
setbacks from the street and is in keeping with the industrial character of the
street
• staff is supportive of the requested variances as the existing parking and drive
aisle width accommodates the parking of employees in a safe manner and has
minimal impact on adjacent properties
• the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate
development of the land and maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan
and the Zoning By-law · ·
Input From Other Sources
Site Plan Committee
Engineering & Public Works
Department
Date of report: April 14, 2016
Lalita Paray, MCIP, RPP
Planner I
LP:MM:Id .
J:\Oocuments\DeVelopment\D-3700\2015\PCA 40-15\Report\PCA 40-15.docx
Enclosures
• no objections to approval
• no comments
;JY[ ~~\
Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner-Development Review
19
20
I
Cl i -<
Cl 0
;§ 0::
0::
~ --:! n::: L
0 < I
~ 0 0 ~ z 0 n::: ::J 0 n::: __J 0::
0 i5 CD
0
f.--'-.. CLEMENTS ROAD
/.
SUBJECT p ROPERTY
/ ....... Cl < ) 0 0::
1---0 '-. FELDSPAR COURT
0:::
0 >-" I McPHERSON COURT 1----/ I a/ -
r
:::--
~ '0 0 0 0:: tl' CD
0 0::
~ Location Map
FILE No: P/CA 40/15
APPLICANT: Enbo Properties Inc. PI< .::1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:Piari 40M-1347 Pt Lot 3, 40R-8867 Parts 1, 2
City Development (1625 Feldspar Court) DATE: Apr. 15, 2015 Department ~ata Sourc-: SCALE 1:5,000 IPN-4 Teran.t Enterpri•-Inc. and lt. •-:ePII•r.· All right. Re .. rv.d, Not a plan of au~. 2013 MPAC and lte auppllera, All \Ohb Raaarv.ct. Not a _p_!an of Survey.
I
to
pe
r
m
i
t
fr
o
n
t
ya
r
d
pa
r
k
i
n
g
to
be
li
m
i
t
e
d
to
1
pe
r
c
e
n
t
of
th
e
to
t
a
l
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
pa
r
k
i
n
g
ar
e
a
II
1\1
~/
/
/
/
/
7
/
.
T
.
T
,
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
'i'
I
0
J
,
De
.
m
--
...
.
-
I
to
pe
r
m
i
t
si
d
e
I
20
.
?
8
ya
r
d
pa
r
k
i
n
g
no
l--
-
-
•
!
L
•
·
~
0--
~
\
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
_
_
_
:
l
~
-
-
5
f
-
-
f
T
i
d
_
_
_
_
!
.
;
=
;
r
-
J
~
cl
o
s
e
r
th
a
n
0.
5
of
~
~
a
me
t
r
e
fr
o
m
th
e
-
;
7/
u
m
o
o
no
r
t
h
si
d
e
lo
t
li
n
e
I
sro
R
A
G
an
d
1.
3
me
t
r
e
s
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
I
fr
o
m
th
e
so
u
t
h
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
I
si
d
e
lo
t
li
n
e
u
.
.
-
;
.
.
.
-
'
"
'
1
1
to
pe
r
m
i
t
a
to
pe
r
m
i
t
an
pe
r
p
e
n
d
i
c
u
l
a
r
wi
d
t
h
ac
c
e
s
s
o
r
y
of
a
dr
i
v
e
ai
s
l
e
us
e
d
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
in
to
ga
i
n
ac
c
e
s
s
to
a
th
e
so
u
t
h
pa
r
k
i
n
g
st
a
l
l
to
be
a
si
d
e
ya
r
d
mi
n
i
m
u
m
of
6.
0
~~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
me
t
r
e
s
fo
r
tw
o
-
w
a
y
tr
a
f
f
i
c
DJ
I
/
I
C
C
I
F
A
S
'
W
I
!
.
T
tv\ MI~UI 'C!Isuw~ -·~ b:: :::J 0 <.) c::: ~ C/)] 0 .....J w u. I (~t~
--
-
'·1\ tv
Ci
t
y
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
Su
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
Pl
a
n
FI
L
E
No
:
PI
C
A
40
/
1
5
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:
En
b
o
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
In
c
.
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
:
Pa
r
t
of
Lo
t
3,
Pi
a
~
40
M
-
1
3
4
7
,
P
a
r
t
s
1,
2,
Plan 40R-8867 (1625 Feldspar Court)
FU
L
L
SC
A
L
E
CO
P
I
E
S
OF
TH
I
S
PL
A
N
AR
E
AV
A
I
L
A
B
L
E
FO
R
VI
E
W
I
N
G
AT
TH
E
CI
T
Y
OF
PI
C
K
E
R
I
N
G
CI'
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
.
j DATE: Apr. 1, 2016 ~
L 7.4m
Submitted Plan
FILE No: P/CA 40/15
APPLICANT: Enbo Properties Inc.
E
LO
LO
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Part of Lot 3, Plan 40M-1347,Parts 1, 2,
FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING
CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Apr. 1, 2016
From:
Subject:
Application
Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number: PICA 21116
Meeting Date: April 20, 2016
Principal Planner-Development Review
Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 21116
Mattamy (Seaton) Limited
Lot 69 on Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2009-13
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 7364114 to permit a minimum rear yard
setback of 5.5 metres; whereas, the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of
6.0 metres.
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a
building permit to construct a detached dwelling.
Recommendation
The City Development Department considers a minimum rear yard setback of 5.5 metres
to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in
keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law,
and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following
conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the proposed det.ached dwelling, as generally sited
and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
April 19, 2019, or this decision shall become null and void.
Comment
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
In 2006, the Central Pickering Development Plan (CPDP) came into effect providing a
policy framework for a sustainable urban community (Seaton) integrated with a natural
heritage system. The CPDP resulted in Amendment 22 to the Pickering Official Plan
(OPA 22).
Pickering Official Plan·-"Low Density Type 2" within the Lamoreaux Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 7364114-"LD 2" Low Density 2 Zone and "LD 2-1" Low Density 2 Zone,
Exception 1
23
24 Report PICA 21/16 April20, 2016
Appropriateness of the Application
Minimum Rear Yard Setback Variance ·
Page2
• the intent of the minimum rear yard setback is to ensure that an adequate
amenity space is provided in the rear yard and appropriate setbacks are provided
to protect the privacy of abutting property owners
• the zoning by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 6.0 metres
• the applicant is proposing to construct a detached dwelling with a minimum rear
yard setback of 5.5 metres
• an adequate amenity space will be provided in the rear yard as the property is an
irregular shaped lot and the minimum rear yard setback of 5.5 metres does not
extend the full width of the rear yard
• the requested variance will not have any adverse impact on the privacy of
abutting property owners as the property abuts a pipeline corridor to the north, an
open space block to the west and the rear yard setback to the east is greater
than 6.0 metres, due to the irregular rear lot line
• the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate
development of the land and maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan
and Zoning By-law
Input From Other Sources
Engineering & Public Works
Date of report: April 13, 2016
Amy Emm, MCIP, RPP
Planner II
AE:MM:Id
J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2016\PCA 21-16 & PCA 22-16Report\PCA 21-16.doc
Enclosures
• no concerns
JJY{. rn~~~V\_
Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner-Development Review
~"' ~~~ __ .... -_ ....
~~ ~
.... --.... --..... -, ,~ ~~~~ ~~~~ I \
-----""' ,......... I I _____________ ............ \
I I I I I I _______________ }
---------------, I I I I I ____ I
I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I
J I I t I f I I I I I I 1 I I I I I : \ \ 1 I I I I I
I \ ~ I I I l _______ j \
I ---------------) I I I I I I I I I ______________________ }
---------,
I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I ',
')
I I I I I I I I ----------, I -----, --, : :
1 I I ----' : : r-----------,
l_ ___________ j
,------------1 I I I ____________ )
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I : : 1 __ ,
TAUNTON
(~ : . (;:-.:;------,
.11 I II I II I II I II I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _jl_)
--1
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
: ! __ .... ----------------
[ __ ) ---------------:
~~~~--I
........................ I
--I ,---:
I -~----~-~~~---~~~~==, -~~-~-~ ~-~~-~-: : :
,. .... --I I I ( ( .... --I l I
: : _j l_)
! I ----------------~ ;::::::~ __ ::::::::::___________ ' SP-2009-13
PROPOSED ROAD
I I
Location Map
FILE No: P/CA 21/16
I I -----------:
I -------~-~--=~~~--~-----1 r 1 \_______ --------: : :
-------\ \ l l I 11 . \ \ _____ I 1 __ 1
\ \ ' -------',, ____________ _ I I I I
APPLICANT: Mattamy (Seaton) Limited
\ \ \ \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J J J J I I I I I I I I I I I I I
/'
I I I I I I I I I I I I
ROAD
... ___________ _ ------------
r---------------------1 I
L-------------~--------/' .-----------------~-----
1 I
City Development
Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Proposed Lot 69, on SP-2009-13
Data Sources: Teranet Enterprises Inc. and Its suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not a plan of survey. 2013 MPAC and Ita sup liera. All rights Reserved. Not a plan of Surve .
DATE: Mar. 30, 2016
SCALE 1 :5,000 PN-16
to permit a minimum rear
yard setback of 5.5 metres
~ / r----,
PROPOSE.0-,..-
2 STO~EY 0.7m
DWELJ.JNG---r I I I I I I I I I
I
A=8.4
r ' / "---.../
PROPOSED ROAD
Submitted Plan
FILE No: P/CA 21/16
APPLICANT: Mattamy (Seaton) Limited
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Proposed Lot 69, on SP-2009-13
City Development
Department
FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING
CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Apr. 4, 2016
From:
Subject:
Applications
Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number: PICA 22116
Meeting Date: April 20, 2016
Principal Planner-Development Review
Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 22116
Mattamy (Seaton) Limited
Block 94, Unit 8 on Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2009-13
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 7364114 to permit a minimum flankage
yard setback of 1.8 metres; whereas, the by-law requires a minimum flankage yard of
2.4 metres. ·
The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a
building permit to construct a townhouse dwelling unit.
Recommendation
The City Development Department considers a minimum flankage yard setback of
1.8 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development-of the land,
and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning ·
By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That this variance apply only to the proposed townhouse dwelling unit, as generally
sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
April 19, 2019, or this decision shall become null and void.
Comment
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
In 2006, the Central Pickering Development Plan (CPDP) came into effect providing a
policy framework for a sustainable urban community (Seaton) integrated with a natural
heritage system. The CPDP resulted in Amendment 22 to the Pickering Official Plan
(OPA 22).
The Pickering Official Plan (OPA 22) -"Mixed Corridor Type 1" within the Lamoreaux
Neighbourhood.
Zoning By-law 7364114-"MC1-2" Mixed Use Corridor Type 1, Exception 2
27
28 Report PICA 22/16 Apri120, 2016
Page2
Appropriateness of the Application
Minimum Flankage Yard Variance
• the intent of a minimum flankage yard setback is' to provide an adequate
separation distance between buildings and street activity in order to provide an
adequate landscaped area
• the zoning by-law requires a minimum flankage yard setback of 2.4 metres
• the applicant is proposing to construct a townhouse dwelling unit with a minimum
flankage yard setback of 1.8 metres
• an adequate landscaped area will be provided as the property is an irregular
shaped corner lot and the minimum 1.8 metres does not extend the full length of
fue~ ·
• an appropriate streetscape will be maintained on the lot ·
• the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate
development of the land and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan
and Zoning By-law
Input From Other Sources
Engineering & Public Works
Date of report: April14, 2016
Comments prepared by:
Amy Emm·, MCIP, RPP
Planner II
AE:MM:Id
• request the applicant provide a preliminary
grading plan to illustrate that the reduced
flankage yard setback will accommodate
proper grading from the face of the building to
the property line
Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner-Development Review
J:\Documents\Development\DM3700\2016\PCA 21-16 & PCA 22-16\Report\PCA 22-16.doc
Enclosures
~ ~-,.,.,. ....
.,.,............... .... .......... ...... (
I ~~~~~~ ~~~~~\ \ l ____ ............ ,............. I I _____________ .......... ,
I I I I I I ---------------' ---------------,
I I I I I --------____ )
I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I i \ \ : \ ~ I I I I I I \ _______ ) \
I
---------------I ) I
I I I I I I I I I I ______________________ ) t
---------,
I I I I
(
I I I ',
I I I I I ','
SP-2009-13
PROPOSED ROAD
-----------.., ,------------1 I I I ------------'
~------------1 I I I ------------' ,-----------1 I I I ------------'
~--,:
I I I I i I l I:
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1 __ '--
Location Map
FILE No: P/CA 22/16
')
I I I I I
\ \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
\ \ \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I
(~
I I
TAUNTON
(;:-..:;------.,
I ,--~
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
''\
I I ·I I' I I I I I I I I I I I ___________ )
_ _) LJ -~ /::::::::-----------~
_____ ,. ... , l
r---BLOCK 94 l l UNIT 8 _____________ ,
I ---1 ----------------: ,--: ................ -,........ I I
11
1
,/-------l l ( I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
ROAD
------------..., ________ _
,---------------------~ !
I I J l ___ -------------------~; i i i __ j I _ _}
!-_:::~~~--~~~~~~==~~~==~~~~~~------~
( _______ :..--------------
1 I
I ----------------I.
I I I -----------~~~~~~~~~-r=; \ ------------------i i i
-----I I I
~========-----------------
I I I I I I __ _.,.---\ \ I I I
\ \ \ ____ _I t __ l
\ \ \ -------', ... _...,. __________ _ I\ 1> \r---+--------=-.?---~1 /
APPLICANT: Mattamy (Seaton) Limited
City Development
Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Proposed Block 94, Unit 8 on SP-2009-13
Data Sources: Teranet Enterprises Inc. and Ita euppllera. All rights Reserved. Not a plan of survey. 2013 t.APAC and Its suppliers. All ri hts Reserved. Not a pion of Surv .
DATE: Mar. 30, 2016
SCALE 1 :5,000 PN-16
Cl
<(
0 0:
Cl
w
(/
)
0 c..
0 0:
c..
Ci
t
y
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
f-1
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
r
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
!"
-
'
I
I
I I
Su
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
Pl
a
n
FI
L
E
No
:
P/
C
A
2
2
/
1
6
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:
Ma
t
t
a
m
y
(S
e
a
t
o
n
)
Li
m
i
t
e
d
E
co
I
13
.
5
m
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
AT
T
A
C
H
E
D
DW
E
L
L
L
I
N
G
) 6.0m
rr
?
-
o
r
r
o
s
'
i
:
.
O
?-
o
r
-
.
O
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
:
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Bl
o
c
k
94
Un
i
t
8
,
on
SP
-
2
0
0
9
-
1
3
FU
L
L
SC
A
L
E
CO
P
I
E
S
OF
TH
I
S
PL
A
N
AR
E
AV
A
I
L
A
B
L
E
FO
R
VIE
W
I
N
G
AT
TH
E
CI
T
Y
OF
PI
C
K
E
R
I
N
G
CI
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
.
3.3m Cl <( 0 0: Cl w (/) 0 c.. 0 0: c.. to permit a minimum flankage yard setback o( 1.8 metres 1' DATE: Apr. 4, 2016 0