Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFebruary 17, 2016Committee of Adjustment Agenda Citqo 4111111 lw if . b,=.1. 1 MIK .c :; l+1t+l+i-H-H+I _ '-v-ir,'a PI Meeting Number: 2 Date: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 PICKERING Committee of Adjustment Agenda Wednesday, January 27, 2016 7:00 pm Main Committee Room (I) Adoption of Agenda (II) Adoption of Minutes from January 27, 2016 (III) Reports 1. (Deferred from the January 27, 2016 meeting) P/CA 100/15 D. Rinneard 5034 Wixson Street 2. (Tabled from the January 27, 2016 meeting) P/CA 02/16 Altona Road Subdivision Ltd. 1870 Altona Road 3. P/CA 03/16 G. Bevacqua 845 Third Concession Road 4. P/CA 04/16 A. Bobat 1833 Misthollow Drive 5. P/CA 05/16 Lebovic Enterprises Ltd. 1603 Dusty Drive 6. P/CA 06/16 2450734 Ontario Inc. (Marshall Homes) 1555 & 1575 Kingston Road 7. P/CA 07/16 I. & S. Gandhi 220 Finch Avenue Page Number 1-9 10-18 19-27 28-34 35-38 39-43 44-48 49-54 Accessible For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: PICKER NG Lesley Dunne T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024 TTY 905.420.1739 Email Idunne@pickering.ca Committee of Adjustment February 17, 2016 Agenda Page 2 of 2 8. P/CA 08/16 M. Bosnjak 1441 Highbush Trial 9. P/CA 09/16 D. Artukovic 1443 Highbush Trail Page Number 55-61 62-68 10. Marshall Homes (Copperfield) Ltd. 69-72 Nordane Drive (IV) Adjournment Accessible PICKE For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: NLesley Dunne T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024 TTY 905.420.1739 Email Idunne@pickering.ca Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 27, 2016 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Pending Adoption Present Tom Copeland — Vice -Chair David Johnson — Chair Eric Newton Denise Rundle Sean Wiley Also Present Melissa Markham, Secretary -Treasurer Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary -Treasurer (I) Adoption of Agenda Moved by David Johnson Seconded by Eric Newton That the agenda for the Wednesday, January 27, 2016 meeting be adopted. Carried Unanimously (II) Adoption of Minutes Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Denise Rundle That the minutes of the 17th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, December 9, 2015 be adopted. Carried Page 1 of 9 1 2 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 27, 2016 7:00 pm Main Committee Room (111) Reports 1. (Deferred from the December 9, 2015 meeting) P/CA 100/15 D. Rinneard 5034 Wixson Street The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended: • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 24 percent; whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 20 percent • to permit a maximum lot coverage of all accessory buildings, excluding private detached garages, to be 9 percent of the lot area; whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of all accessory buildings, excluding private detached garages, to be 5 percent of the lot area • to recognize an existing front yard setback of 6.6 metres (Building 1); whereas the by-law permits a minimum front yard setback of 9.0 metres • to recognize an existing unenclosed covered porch projecting a maximum of 2.0 metres into the required front yard (Building 1); whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard • to permit an existing accessory dwelling unit contained within an accessory building (Building 2); whereas the by-law states that an accessory dwelling unit shall mean oneself contained dwelling unit contained within a permitted detached dwelling or semi-detached dwelling • to permit an existing accessory building (Building 2) to be partially located in the side yard; whereas the by-law requires all accessory buildings which are not part of the main building to be erected in the rear yard • to permit an existing accessory building (Building 2) to be set back 0.4 of a metre from the south side lot line; whereas the by-law permits accessory buildings greater than 10.0 square metres in area to be set back a minimum of 1.0 metre from all lot lines • to permit an existing accessory building (Building 2) with a maximum height of 4.3 metres; whereas the by-law states that no accessory building shall exceed a height of 3.5 metres in any residential zone • to permit an existing accessory building (Building 3) to be set back 0.3 of a metre from the rear lot line and 0.6 of a metre from the south side lot line; whereas the by-law permits accessory buildings greater than 10.0 square. metres in area to be set back a minimum of 1.0 metre from all lot lines Page 2 of 9 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 27, 2016 7:00 pm Main Committee Room • to permit an accessory building (Building 4) with a maximum height of 5.5 metres; whereas the by-law states that no accessory building shall exceed a height of 3.5 metres in any residential zone • to permit an existing accessory building (Building 4) to be set back 0.6 of a metre from the rear lot line; whereas the by-law permits accessory buildings greater than 10.0 square metres in area to be set back a minimum of 1.0 metre from all lot lines The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to permit an accessory dwelling unit to be located within an accessory building, an increase in maximum lot coverage and maximum lot coverage of all accessory buildings, and recognize existing setbacks to the main dwelling and accessory buildings and to obtain a building permit to construct an addition to an existing accessory building (detached garage). The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions and refusal for maximum height of a proposed addition to an existing building (Building 4) and an existing accessory dwelling unit (Building 2). Written comments were received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no objection to the proposal. Written comments were also received from the Region of Durham Environmental Health Division indicating the existing private sewage disposal system intended to serve the additional dwelling unit in Building 2 is not in compliance with the current Ontario Building Code, and the septic tank and leaching bed would require replacing/upgrading and there is limited space available on the property for a prime and reserve area. Duff Rinneard, owner, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. D. Rinneard stated that he did not receive a copy of the City Development Department staff report. Moved by David Johnson Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 100/15 by D. Rinneard, be Deferred to the next Committee of Adjustment meeting to allow the applicant to obtain and review staff recommendations. Carried Unanimously Page 3 of 9 3 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 27, 2016 7:00 pm Main Committee Room 2. (Deferred from the December 9, 2015 meeting) P/CA 113/15 J., R., & J. Mayo 773 Aspen Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 4407/73 and By-law 113/74: • to permit a covered platform (deck) to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms, not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard • to permit a partially covered platform (deck) to project a maximum of 5.3 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the by=law permits uncovered steps or platforms, not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 40 percent, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to recognize an existing covered deck and to permit a partially covered platform (deck) in the rear yard. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no objection to the proposed variances. Jameson Correa, owner, was present to represent the application. John and Margaret Sparks of 776 Pebble Court were present in objection to the application. John and Margaret Sparks expressed a concern with the lot coverage appears to be more than 40 percent and the deck covers the entire backyard.. John Sparks provided pictures for the Committee Members to review. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Jameson Correa stated they would be willing to remove half of the platform in order to replant trees and grass. Jameson Correa also stated they would also be willing to remove the roof over the hot tub. Page 4 of 9 PI Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 27, 2016 7:00 pm Main Committee Room In response to a question from a Committee Member, the Secretary -Treasurer provided clarification on how the lot coverage is calculated within the Zoning By-law and a building permit will be required to ensure the partially covered deck is built in accordance with the Building Code. Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by David Johnson That application P/CA 113/15 by J., R., & J. Mayo, be Approved on the grounds that the existing covered platform (deck) projecting a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard, a partially covered platform (deck) projecting a maximum of 5.3 metres into the required rear yard and a maximum lot coverage of 40 percent are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the existing unenclosed covered platform (deck) and proposed unenclosed partially covered platform (deck), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the covered area of the proposed partially covered platform (deck) not exceed a maximum of 11.5 square metres. 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed partially covered platform (deck), by June 9, 2016, or this decision shall become null and void Carried Vote Tom Copeland in favour David Johnson in favour Eric Newton in favour Denise Rundle opposed Sean Wiley in favour 3. P/CA 01/16 D. Oates & N. Cameron -Oates 1974 Glendale Drive The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended to permit: • an existing accessory building (detached garage) to be partially located in the south side yard, whereas the by-law requires all accessory buildings, which are not part of the main building, to be erected in the rear yard Page 5 of 9 5 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 27, 2016 7:00 pm Main Committee Room ® an existing accessory building (shed) setback 0.5 of a metre from the south side lot line; whereas the by-law requires accessory buildings less than 10.0 square metres in area to be setback a minimum of 0.6 of a metre from all lot lines The applicant has submitted a building permit for a one -storey addition at the rear of an, existing detached dwelling. As a result of the proposed addition, the existing garage will be partially located in the south side yard, and no longer completely within the rear yard, which is not permitted under the current zoning by-law. The applicant is requesting approval of this minor variance application in order to allow an existing accessory building (detached garage) to be partially located in the south side yard and to recognize an existing accessory building (shed) setback 0.5 of a metre from the south side lot line. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no objection to the proposal. David Oates & Nancy Cameron -Oates, owners, Kevin Tait, agent, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Kevin Tait explained the application and submitted four letters from surrounding neighbours in support of the application for the Committee Members to review. Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 01/16 by D. Oates & N. Cameron -Oates, be Approved on the grounds that the existing accessory building (detached garage) to be partially. located in the south side yard and an existing accessory building (shed) setback 0.5 of a metre from the south side lot line are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the existing detached garage, and shed as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed addition by January 27, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously Page 6 of 9 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 27, 2016 7:00 pm Main Committee Room 4. P/CA 02/16 Altona Road Subdivision Ltd. 1870 Altona Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 4366/93 and By-law 5537/99: • to permit Building B and Building D to be erected having a height of 13.0 metres; whereas the by-law states that no building, part of a building, or structure that exceeds a height of 12.0 metres shall be erected • to permit a minimum building height of 7.0 metres for Building E (located in the area cross -hatched on Schedule I to By-law 5537/99; whereas the by-law states that in the area cross -hatched on Schedule I to By-law 5537/99, the minimum building height shall be 12.0 metres, and the maximum building height shall be 18.0 metres • to permit the aggregate of the gross leasable floor areas of all buildings on the lands, except multiple dwellings, to be a minimum of 660 square metres; whereas the by-law requires the aggregate of the gross leasable floor areas of all buildings on the lands, except multiple dwellings, to be a minimum of 940 square metres • to permit multiple dwelling - horizontal units with two parking spaces located within a garage to provide no parking space between the vehicular entrance of the private garage and the nearest traffic aisle, or public road; whereas the by-law states that for each multiple dwelling -- horizontal unit there shall be provided on the lands one parking space located between the vehicular entrance of the private garage and the nearest traffic aisle, or public road The applicant has requested approval of these variances in order to obtain Site Plan Approval for a proposed mixed use development consisting of 38 residential townhouse units and a four -storey commercial building on the subject lands. The Secretary -Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending the application be tabled. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no concerns. Written comments were also received from Joseph and Nicole Kirwan (Davis) in objection to the application. Melissa McKay, applicant, Sean Lawrence, architect, were present to represent the application. Nicole Davis of 1972 Pine Grove Avenue was present in objection to the application. Catherine Debbert (DCC 140), of 14 Shipp Crescent and Linda Blaschek of 1995 Pine Grove Avenue were present in support of the application. Page 7 of 9 7 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 27, 2016 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Nicole Davis expressed a concern with high number of units being proposed, the height of the dwellings exceeding the maximum permitted height and a potential increase in traffic. She was also concerned with the units being proposed with no driveways and the potential safety implications for children on the road. She spoke to correspondence that was previously submitted to the Committee in opposition to the application. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Melissa McKay stated they have submitted a second submission for Site Plan that is currently being reviewed. Sean Lawrence provided an overview of the proposed site plan for the subject property. Sean Lawrence stated the entrance for the commercial plaza has been located as close to Altona Road as possible. He stated that there is an access for vehicles to Altona Road from the south end of the development to help alleviate traffic concerns along Pine Grove Avenue. In response to the concern related to building heights he stated that the height for Block E is lower than the Zoning By-law requirements. He advised that Blocks 'B' and `D' require an increase in maximum building height, however due to the grading of the site Blocks `B' and `D' will visually be the same height as Block E. Catherine Debbert stated she is the property manager for the condominium development to the west. She stated that she has been working closely with the applicant to address their concerns with the proposed development. Moved by David Johnson Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 02/16 by Altona Road Subdivision Ltd., be Tabled in order to allow time for City staff to evaluate certain elements of the proposed site plan as it relates to the variances requested. Carried Unanimously (IV) Other Business 1. Appointment of Chairperson Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland That David Johnson be appointed as Chairperson for the 2016 term. Carried Unanimously Page 8 of 9 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 27, 2016 7:00 pm Main Committee Room cV) 2. Appointment of Vice -Chairperson Moved by David Johnson Seconded by Eric Newton That Tom Copeland be appointed as Vice -Chairperson for the 2016 term. Carried Unanimously Adjournment Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by David Johnson That the 1st meeting of the 2016 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 8:12 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, February 17, 2016. Carried Unanimously Date Vice -Chair Assistant Secretary -Treasurer Page 9 of 9 9 10 Citit all PICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 100/15 Meeting Date: February 17, 2016 From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Revised Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 100/15 D. Rinneard 5034 Wixson Street Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended: • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 24 percent; whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 20 percent • to permit a maximum lot coverage of all accessory buildings, excluding private detached garages, to be 9 percent of the lot area; whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of all accessory buildings, excluding private detached garages, to be 5 percent of the lot area • to recognize an existing front yard setback of 6.6 metres (Building 1); whereas the by-law permits a minimum front yard setback of 9.0 metres • to recognize an existing unenclosed covered porch projecting a maximum of 2.0 metres into the required front yard (Building 1); whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard • to permit an existing accessory dwelling unit contained within an accessory building (Building 2); whereas the by-law states that an accessory dwelling unit shall mean oneself contained dwelling unit contained within a permitted detached dwelling or semi-detached dwelling • to permit an existing accessory building (Building 2) to be partially located in the side yard; whereas the by-law requires all accessory buildings which are not part of the main building to be erected in the rear yard • to permit an existing accessory building (Building 2) to be set back 0.4 of a metre from the south side lot line; whereas the by-law permits accessory buildings greater than 10.0 square metres in area to be set back a minimum of 1.0 metre from all lot lines • to permit an existing accessory building (Building 2) with a maximum height of 4.3 metres; whereas the by-law states that no accessory building shall exceed a height of 3.5 metres in any residential zone Report P/CA100/15 February 17, 2016 Page 2 • to permit an existing accessory building (Building 3) to be set back 0.3 of a metre from the rear lot line and 0.6 of a metre from the south side lot line; whereas the by-law permits accessory buildings greater than 1.0.0 square metres in area to be set back a minimum of 1.0 metre from all lot lines • to permit an accessory building (Building 4) with a maximum height of 5.5 metres; whereas the by-law states that no accessory building shall exceed a height of 3.5 metres in any residential zone • to permit an existing accessory building (Building 4) to be set back 0.6 of a metre from the rear lot line; whereas the by-law permits accessory buildings greater than. 10.0 square metres in area to be set back a minimum of 1.0 metre from all lot lines The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to permit an accessory dwelling unit to be located within an accessory building, an increase in maximum lot coverage and maximum lot coverage of all accessory buildings, and recognize existing setbacks to the main dwelling and accessory buildings and to obtain a building permit to construct an addition to an existing accessory building (detached garage). Recommendations The City Development Department considers an increase in maximum lot coverage to 24 percent of the lot area and a maximum lot coverage of all accessory buildings, excluding private detached garages, to be 9 percent of the lot area to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the lot and structures, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. And Building 1 The City Development Department considers an existing front yard setback of 6.6 metres and an existing unenclosed covered porch projecting a maximum of 2.0 metres into the required front yard to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the existing building (Building 1), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. And 11 12 Report P/CA100/15 February 17, 2016 Page 3 Building 2 The City Development Department considers an existing accessory dwelling unit contained within an accessory building that is partially located in the side yard, set back 0.4 of a metre from the south side lot line, with a height of 4.3 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the existing accessory building (Building 2), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. Obtain a building permit to reflect the building construction of Building 2 by February 17, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. And Building 3 The City Development Department considers an existing accessory building set back 0.3 of a metre from the rear lot line and 0.6 of a metre from the south side lot line to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following condition: 1. That the variance apply only to the existing accessory building (Building 3), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. And Building 4 The City Development Department considers an existing accessory building set back 0.6 of a metre from the rear lot line having a height of 5.5 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the portion of Building 4 currently existing and not the proposed garage addition, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. And The City Development Department considers a maximum height of 5.5 metres for an addition to an existing accessory, building to be a major variance that is not considered to be desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Refusal of. the proposed variance. Report P/CA100/15 February 17, 2016 Page 4 Official Plan and Zoning By-law The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject property as Rural Settlements — Oak Ridges Moraine Rural Hamlets The subject property is currently zoned "ORM-R5" — Oak Ridges Moraine — Hamlet Residential Five within Zoning By-law 3037, as amended. Appropriateness of the Application Existing Front Yard Depth, Covered Porch, Side Yard Widths, Height and Location of Accessory Building in the Side Yard • the general intent of performance standards in a zoning by-law is to ensure that buildings maintain appropriate height, massing and setbacks that are complimentary to the character of the surrounding neighbourhood • existing Buildings 1, 2, and 4 were constructed on the subject lands in 1907 • existing Building 3.was constructed on the subject lands by a previous owner in 1977 • the existing buildings maintain appropriate height, massing and setbacks that are that are in keeping with the hamlet's historical character • the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the property and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Lot Coverage and Lot Coverage of Accessory Buildings Variances • the intent of the maximum lot coverage requirement of 20 percent and the 5 percent maximum coverage for accessory buildings is to maintain an appropriate amount of amenity area uncovered by buildings on a lot and to ensure the massing, scale and size of buildings are appropriate for the size of the lot • the proposed lot coverage of 9 percent for the accessory buildings is an existing condition • two of the existing accessory buildings (Buildings 2 and 4) were constructed in1907 • the applicant is proposing to increase an overall lot coverage to 24 percent, to accommodate the proposed addition to Building 4 (detached garage) • an adequate amount of outdoor amenity area is maintained as uncovered by buildings on the subject property • the overall size, scale and massing is appropriate and the existing accessory buildings appear to have no adverse impact on the surrounding neighbours or character of the neighbourhood • the requested lot coverage variance is minor in nature and meets the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law 13 14 Report P/CA100/15 February 17, 2016 Page 5 Existing Accessory Dwelling Unit Contained within an Accessory Building (Building 2) • the intent of defining "Accessory Dwelling Unit" is to permit an additional dwelling unit within the primary dwelling on a lot • the applicant is requesting to recognize an existing accessory dwelling unit within an Accessory Building (Building 2) • the accessory dwelling unit has been in existence since 2013, prior to this time the structure was functioning as a detached garage • it appears that the accessory dwelling unit is subordinate to the main dwelling (Building 2) and that there appears to be no adverse impact on the streetscape • the property functions as a residential property which is in character with the surrounding neighbourhood • staff have received revised comments from Durham Region's Environmental Health Division stating that they no longer have an objection to the proposal as the applicant has successfully obtained a building permit for a new private sewage disposal system to service both residential units • the requested variance to permit an additional dwelling unit within an accessory building is minor in nature and meets the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law Increase in Maximum Height of an Accessory Building (Building 4) Variance • the intent of the maximum building height of 3.5 metres for accessory buildings is to minimize the visual impact of these buildings on abutting properties and on the streetscape, while still allowing for subordinate buildings and structures to be located on a lot • the applicant has requested relief to permit an addition to an existing accessory building (Building 4) to have a maximum height of 5.5 metres (from the finished grade to the midpoint of the roof) • the existing shed on the property (Building 4) was constructed in 1907 and has a height of 5.5 metres • the applicant has advised that the proposed detached garage will contain a car stacking mechanism for vehicle storage • the proposed height, scale and massing of the detached garage is not compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood • it is staff's opinion that the existing shed can remain on the property, however any addition to the building must comply with the current zoning by-law • the variance to increase the maximum height of a detached garage is not supported by City staff as a height of 3.5 metres can be achieved through the appropriate design of the accessory building to comply with the zoning by-law • staff is of the opinion that the proposed increase in building height is not minor and will create an accessory building with a size and massing that is undesirable for the development of the property • staff is of the opinion that the proposed variance results in an inappropriate scale of development in relation to the built form that has been established in the neighbourhood and is not in keeping with the character of the surrounding area Report P/CA100/15 February 17, 2016 Page 6 ® staff is of the opinion that the proposed height, scale and massing of the detached garage is not considered minor and not in keeping with the intent and purpose of the zoning by-law, and therefore the requested variance is a major variance that is not desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works Department Building Services Durham Region Environmental Health Division Date of report: February 11, 2016 Comme ts-prepared by: Amy Emm, MCIP, RPP Planner II AE:MM:Id ® no objection to the proposal • no comment at this time ® no objection to proposal ® a building permit for a new private sewage disposal system to service both residential units was approved on December 18, 2015 and is valid for one calendar year teril Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review J:1Documents\Development\D-3700'20151PCA 100-15 D. Rinneard Report\PCA 100-15 - Revised Feb 17.doc Enclosures 15 16 CLAREMONT UNITED CHURCH—, DAV ID CO HENRY ST. STREET LAREMONT :LIC SCHOOL RN 0 0 0 0 a. 0 0 CO 0 O z Q 0 LANE LANE STREET IJ w CLARE JOSE PH 0 CTRE 0 0 0 0 CO 0 J 0 MIX CLAREMONT COMMUNITY CENTRE CENTRAL WELLINGTON F7REHALL No. 4 CLAREMONT PARK LEGION HALL z O 1— z CLARE/VONT BAPTIST CHURCH w z m STREET z O J STREET • 4 City Development • Department Location Map FILE No: P/CA 100/15 APPLICANT: D. Rinneard PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 12, Lot 6 South Part Lot 7 & 8, (5034 Wixson Street) DATE: Aug. 26, 2015 Data Source.; Teranet Enterprises Inc. and Its suppliers. All rlghte Reserved. Not a plan of .urvey. 2013 MPAC and Its suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not a plan of Survey. SCALE 1:5,000 PN -RU 17 To permit an accessory building with a maximug , height of 5.5 metres a To permit an existing accessory building to be set back 0.6 of a metre from the rear lot line 0(1137) 5,0,24W ry w j M 1• To permit an existing accessory building to be set back 0.3 of a metre 'from the rear lot line anff T 0.6 of a metre from the aim south side lot line arag 0.0711 To permit an existing accessory building with a maximum height of 4.3 metres li k 0 To recognize an existing unenclosed covered porch projecting a maximum of 2.0 metres into the required front yard Oauble Boord PRQPIJ'SED GARAGE ADDITION BUILDING ////•4 0.65£ EXISTING Fenc 0.148 GRAVEL 0,92£S H ED %%//////// /.. - -,e online • m BUILDING 13 FAT / 0.38£ 40.23 0) (P1EUeos) 40,26 To permit a maximum lot coverage of all accessory buildings, excluding private detached garages, to be 9% of the lot area 10 (1163) P.1,14. 6382--0062 (l.T) AREA — 1,877 SQ M Shed ///3//////////��/// BUILDING 1 6.76 _} 01 To permit a maximum lot coverage of 24 percent To recognize an. existing front yard setback of 6.6 metres I STORE( k, .g WELLIN BUILDING..: 2 • 0.55N 0.4617 Daub! e Boa 6.61 N71'46'20”E To permit an existing accessory building to be- set back 0.4 of a metre from the south side lot line ,)35 CLS 6 �pa To permit an existing accessory dwelling unit contained within an accessory building (40. . • WIXSON STREET To permit an existing accessory building to be partially located in the side yard City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 100/15 APPLICANT: D. Rinneard PROPERTY DESCRIPTION; Plan 12, Lot 6 South Part Lot 7 & 8, (5034 Wixson Street) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Sept. 1, 2015 18 t � V.A0v. :1 SIDE (NORTH) ELEVATION EXISTING PROPOSED 1 vl�Ei!ir4 c fl S- C% f2atOsulees Emit) A akcire.1 FRONT (EAST) ELEVATION to City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 100/15 APPLICANT: D. Rinneard PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 12, Lot 6'South Part Lot 7 & 8, (5034 Wixson Street) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING ATTHE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Sept. 1, 2015 Cif c1 PICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 02/16 Meeting Date: February 17, 2016 (Tabled at the January 27, 2016 meeting) From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 02/16 Altona Road Subdivision Ltd. 1870 Altona Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 4366/93 and By-law 5537/99: • to permit Building B and Building D to be erected having a height of 13.0 metres; whereas the by-law states that no building, part of a building, or structure that exceeds a height of 12.0 metres shall be erected • to permit a minimum building height of 7.0 metres for Building E (located in the area cross -hatched on Schedule I to By-law 5537/99; whereas the by-law states that ih the area cross -hatched on Schedule I to By-law 5537/99, the minimum building height shall be 12.0 metres, and the maximum building height shall be 18.0 metres • to permit the aggregate of the gross leasable floor areas of all buildings on the lands, except multiple dwellings, to be a minimum of 660 square metres; whereas the by-law requires the aggregate of the gross leasable floor areas of all buildings on the lands, except multiple dwellings, to be a minimum of 940 square metres • to permit multiple dwelling - horizontal units with two parking spaces located within a garage to provide no parking space between the vehicular entrance of the private garage and the nearest traffic aisle, or public road; whereas the by-law states that for each multiple dwelling — horizontal unit there shall be provided on the lands one parking space located between the vehicular entrance of the private garage and the nearest traffic aisle, or public road The applicant has requested approval of these variances in order to obtain Site Plan Approval for a proposed mixed use development consisting of 38 residential townhouse units and a four -storey commercial building on the subject lands. 19 20 Report P/CA 02/16 February 17, 2016 Page 2 Recommendation The City Development Department considers Buildings B and D to be erected having a height of 13.0 metres, a minimum building height of 7.0 metres for Building E, the aggregate of the gross leasable floor areas of all buildings to be a minimum of 660 square metres and permit multiple dwelling — horizontal units with two parking spaces located within a garage to provide no parking space between the vehicular entrance of the private garage and the nearest traffic aisle, or public road, to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed development, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain Site Plan Approval and building permits for the proposed construction by February 16, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. Background The Committee of Adjustment has approved three previous Minor Variance applications (P/CA 32/02, P/CA 58/05, and P/CA 39/07) to vary the height provisions and gross leasable floor in Zoning By-laws 4366/93 and 5537/99. The Committee of Adjustment tabled a fourth variance application in 2010 (P/CA 21/10) to allow staff and the Site Plan Committee additional time to further review the site plan application. In June 2015, P/CA 21/10 was withdrawn by the property owner. In July 2015, the property changed ownership and a new Site Plan Application S 03/15 has been submitted by Stafford Developments to the City for review and approval. On January 27, 2016, the Committee of Adjustment tabled the Minor Variance application in order to allow time for City staff to evaluate certain elements of the proposed site plan as it relates to the variances requested. On February 9, 2016, the applicant submitted revised plans to address staff concerns related to interior parking spaces. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject property as "Mixed Use Areas — Local Node" in the Highbush Neighbourhood. The subject property is currently zoned "LCA -6" — Local Central Area and "OS -A" - Landscaped Open Space within Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-laws 5537/99 and 4366/93. Report P/CA 02/16 February 17, 2016 Page 3 Appropriateness of the Application Increased Building Height for Building B and Building D Variance • the intent of the maximum building height of 12.0 metres is to minimize the visual impact of new buildings/development on the existing streetscape, ensure that new development is compatible with the surrounding residential neighbourhood • the intent of the zoning by-law in implementing a maximum height of 12.0 metres, was to permit dwellings that were about 2 — 3 storeys in height, which would be consistent with the heights of dwellings on surrounding properties • the applicant is proposing a maximum height of 13.0 metres, for three-storey dwellings • `Building Height' is defined as the vertical distance between the established grade, and in the case of a flat roof, the highest point of the roof surface or parapet wall, the mean height level between eaves and ridge • the established grade for the site is irregular, which has resulted in Building B having a height of 12.57 metres and Building D having a height of 12.9 metres due to the proposed established grade of the property • the existing height, built form, and massing along Pine Grove Avenue and the surrounding area consists of two-storey and three-storey residential dwellings • the proposed height of the townhouse units will be consistent with the heights of dwellings on surrounding properties • the proposed heights will not alter the character of the neighbourhood and will have minimal visual impact on the existing streetscape • the requested variances are appropriate for the development of the subject lands as the height and massing of the proposed dwellings will be compatible with the existing built form along Pine Grove Avenue Staff are of the opinion that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintain the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Reduction in Building Height for Building E Variance • the intent of the minimum height of 12.0 metres and a maximum height of 18.0 metres for the northeast corner of the site is to create a focal point through the use of building height at the intersection of Altona Road and Pine Grove Avenue • the applicant is proposing a part of Building E to have a minimum height of 7.0 metres • the proposed reduction in height is due to the need for a loading area, garbage storage and utility rooms, which does not allow for residential units to be located above these servicing elements • the reduction in height is for a portion of the building at the farthest point of the building, away from the focal point • the height requirements at the corner of Altona Road and Pine Grove Avenue have been achieved through the design of the Building E 21 22 Report P/CA 02/16 February 17, 2016 Page 4 • the requested variance is appropriate for the development of the subject lands as the height and massing of the proposed development will be compatible with the existing built form along Pine Grove Avenue Staff are of the opinion that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintain the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Reduction in the Aggregate of the Gross Leasable Floor Area Variance • the intent of the requirement for a minimum aggregate Gross Leasable Floor Area of 940 square metres devoted to non-residential uses is to ensure that an appropriate balance between residential and commercial uses is achieved, and that the site functions as a Local Node • the applicant is proposing a minimum aggregate Gross Leasable Floor Area of 660 square metres • the requested variance to provide a minimum aggregate Gross Leasable Floor Area of 660 square metres would still provide the opportunity for an appropriate mix of residential and non-residential uses at the northeast corner of the site and would continue to allow the site to function as a Local Node Staff are of the opinion that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintain the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Multiple Dwelling - Horizontal Units with Two Parking Spaces Located within a Garage Variance • the intent of requiring each multiple dwelling -horizontal unit to provide one private garage attached to the dwelling unit and one parking space located between the vehicular entrance of the private garage and the nearest traffic aisle, or public road is to ensure that two parking spaces are provided for each dwelling unit • the applicant is proposing to permit multiple dwelling -horizontal units with two parking spaces located within a garage to provide no parking space between the vehicular entrance of the private garage and the nearest traffic aisle, or public road • the applicant is proposing two parking spaces within a garage, which comply with the minimum parking space area of not less than 2.6 metres in width and not less than 5.3 metres in length • City staff met with the applicant and requested that the two parking spaces within a garage, in a tandem layout, be revised to increase the internal space for vehicles, beyond the minimum requirements • the applicant has revised the internal layout of the tandem parking spaces to increase the size of each parking space, and has agreed to update the Purchase and Sale Agreement, for units with tandem parking spaces, to include a warning clause that elaborates on the size of the tandem parking spaces and the type of vehicles that can be accommodated in them Report P/CA 02/16 February 17, 2016 Page 5 Buildings A, B, C and D contain two parking spaces within a garage (Building A and Building C contain two tandem parking spaces) Staff are of the opinion that the requested variance js minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintain the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works Department Toronto Region Conservation Authority Residents Comments J. and N. Kirwan (1972 Pine Grove Avenue) Letter of concern received January 27, 2016 • no concerns with the proposed minor variances 0 • the eastern portion of the subject lands contains a portion of the Regional Storm Flood Plan associated with the Petticoat Creek, which is located north of the site beyond Pine Grove Avenue and east of the site beyond Altona Road lands are within the TRCA Regulated Area; any development will required a TRCA permit no concerns with the proposed minor variances • Block E (height, scale and massing) not in keeping with the surrounding residential houses • concerned with shadow and overlook from balconies on existing residential • entrance to the site from Pine Grove, too close to Altona Road Date of report: February 11, 2016 Comments prepared by: Lalita Paray, MCIP, RPP Planner LP:MM:Id J:tDocuments\Developmen6D-3700t2016'PCA 02-16\Reporttpca 02_16 Feb 17 2016.doc Enclosures 21/14/V— Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review 23 24 Ga 0)6 MELDRON m PINE SANDHURST GROVE 0 z 0 Q SPARROW 111 1- 0 0 w J 0 CHICKADEE} SUBJECT ROPERTY — 0 w Z Q 0 0 ENUE z w z cr CD 0 0 FA 1111111p 11 � MOSSBROOK , Elm 1: Nom =, SQUARE -= 11.111111111 �� WESTCREEK WESTCREEK PUBL/C SCHOOL cc STREET City Development Department /ALLEYV/E PARK BUTTERNUT CRT u u Location Map 0 • r. .� // oft � 44 FILE No: P/CA 2/16 APPLICANT: Altona Road Subdivision Ltd. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 40M-1700, Pt. Blk 69 & Con 1, Pt. Lot 33 40R-12948, Pt. Part 3 (1870 Altona Road) DATE: Jan. 6, 2016 Data Sources: p Tenanst Enterprise. Inc. and Its euppllere. NI rights Reserved. Not a plan D 2013 MPAC and Its suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not a plan of Survey. of eurvy. SCALE 1:5,000 PN -10 25 To permit the aggregate of the gross leasable floor areas of all buildings on the lands, except multiple dwellings, to be a minimum of 660 square metres To permit a minimum building height of 7.0 metres for Building E (located in the area cross -hatched on Schedule I to By-law 5537/99) To permit a maximum height of 13.0 metre for Buildings "B" and "D" ALTONA ROAD To permit multiple dwelling- horizontal. units with two parking spaces located within a garage to provide no parking space between the vehicular entrance of the private garage and the nearest traffic aisle, or public road T City Development Department 1 Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 02/16 APPLICANT: Altona Road Subdivision Ltd. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 40M-1700, Pt. Blk 69 & Con 1, Pt. Lot 33 40R-12948, Pt. Part 3 (1870 Altona Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Jan. 12, 2016 26 2. 60. ©ari©g 11 1X111I1Y �1t1■� sill B. ;awi"'7� inrigas gay e r IUI 11!!! o� 4 311' 1111•111 . ,I am ww aw vm EON 6200 BLOdK B EAS ELEVATION BLOCK B WEST ELEVATION 6000 EOM T .00 6500 BLOCK D EAST ELEVATION - „1--"--,w1 r .1111 =-- 1 =— 1111" 1 IN y��I .1 int �i r 1.111/1111 1 i 11 1RI 1111. rI Jiii 11 1 _111_ _II 1'1 _I _ 1 1 BLOCK D WEST ELEVATION s City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 02/16 APPLICANT: Altona Road Subdivision Ltd. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 40M-1700, Pt. BIk 69 & Con 1, Pt. Lot 33 40R-12948, Pt. Part 3 (1870 Altona Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Jan. 12, 2016 27 4:50 6450 ( sab [ 5450 54. N/>•1r. MN IS ! I _ . NUMB rte_ arimuszmism••■•=-••• . ,. 11111111111 BLOCK E EAST ELEVATION simt11sr2®L'siinin j r Ilii .•L..r,L� Hr.. a law -7,-111: MI milk:!. -it . MEI M�M�Es ��i z . _i,._ a , 31E11 1111 1tr'I1 ■F IU 1s:■ E I� �_� _ _ lit _ I_.J BLOCK E WEST ELEVATION City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 02/16 APPLICANT: Altona Road Subdivision Ltd. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 40M-1700, Pt. Blk 69 & Con 1, Pt. Lot 33 40R-12948, Pt. Part 3 (1870 Altona Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Jan. 12, 2016 28 Cite o4 PICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 03/16 Meeting Date: February 17, 2016 From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 03/16 G. Bevacqua 845 Third Concession Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended: • to permit an accessory building with a maximum height of 4.5 metres; whereas the by-law states that no accessory building shall exceed a height of 3.5 metres in any residential zone • to permit a total lot coverage of all accessory buildings, excluding private detached garages, to be a maximum of 7.3 percent of the lot area; whereas the by-law states that the total lot coverage of all accessory buildings, excluding private detached garages, shall not exceed 5 percent of the lot area , The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to construct a 372 square metre accessory building, to be located in the rear yard. Recommendation The City Development Department considers an accessory building with a maximum height of 4.5 metres, and a total lot coverage of 7.3 percent, to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed accessory structure (detached garage), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain approval from the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing regarding Minister Zoning Order Amendment Application (18- MZOA-158916), or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the structure maintains an accessory status to the principal residential use of the subject lands. 4. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by February 8, 2018, or this decision shall become null and void. Report P/CA 03/16 February 17, 2016 Page 2 Background In December 2001, the Committee of Adjustment approved a Minor Variance Application (P/CA 62/01), which allowed for the construction of a detached garage with a maximum height of 4.5 metres. The detached garage approved by P/CA 62/01, and constructed, was related to a different accessory building than the current application. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject property as "Rural Cluster" within the Rural Settlement of Cherrywood and Area, which allows for residential uses. The subject property is currently zoned "A" — Rural Agricultural within Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, which permits a detached dwelling, accessory buildings and structures, and a home-based business within the main dwelling. Appropriateness of the Application Increase in Height in a Residential Zone • the intent of the maximum accessory building height of 3.5 metres in a residential zone is to minimize the visual impact that these structures may have on abutting properties and on the streetscape, to ensure other yards are not significantly obstructed by these structures on the property, and to further ensure that accessory buildings do not become the dominant buildings on residential properties • the proposed height of 4.5 metres for the accessory structure is an increase of 1.0 metre from the zoning bylaw requirements of 3.5 metres • the subject property is surrounded by vacant fields to the east and south • the proposed structure will have minimal impact on abutting properties as it will be located in the southeast corner • the proposed location of the detached garage will ensure that other yards are not obstructed by the building • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law Increase in Total Lot Coverage • the intent of the maximum lot coverage requirement of 5 percent total lot coverage of all accessory buildings, excluding private detached garages, is to maintain an appropriate amount of amenity area uncovered by buildings on a lot and to ensure the massing, scale and size of buildings are appropriate for the size of the lot • the applicant is requesting to add a fourth accessory building (detached garage) in the rear yard to store antique vehicles and other personal items 29 30 • Report P/CA 03/16 February 17, 2016 Page 3 • the proposed detached garage is not excluded from the 5 percent lot calculation as it is not the primary detached garage for the property • the proposed detached garage will have a floor area of approximately 372 square metres and a height of 4.5 metres • the proposed detached garage has a total lot coverage of 5 percent • when combined with the existing accessory buildings on the lands, the total lot coverage for all accessory buildings is 7.3 percent • an adequate amount of outdoor amenity area is maintained as uncovered by buildings on the subject property • the requested lot coverage variance is minor in nature and meets the intent and purpose of the Official Pian and the Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works Department Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing Residents Comments B. and J. Lytwynchuk (827 Third Concession Road) Letter of concern received February 10, 2016 • no objection • lands are within the Agricultural Zone of Minister's Zoning Order (MZO), Ontario Regulation 154/03, which generally restricts land use to agricultural uses and associated residential dwellings and accessory structures • the MZO requires residential dwellings and accessory structures to have a maximum total lot coverage of all accessory buildings or structures, excluding private detached garage, not exceeding 5 percent of the total lot area • the applicant has submitted an application to amend the MZO to permit the proposed accessory structure with a total lot coverage of 7.3 percent • concerns with the proposed accessory structure size, height, total lot area, and the use of the structure to store cars (potential to increase noise and traffic levels on Third Concession Road) • visual impact from their property; negatively affect the view of the landscape, and the personal enjoyment of property • the structure will be disproportionately large to any structure on the property or in the general vicinity • negative impact on property values of adjacent residential properties Report P/CA 03/16 February 17, 2016 31 Page 4 Date of report: February 11, 2016 Comments prepared by: • recommend that the applicant comply with the Zoning By-law requirements for height, 3.5 metres and total lot coverage of 5 percent 7/1/ /If, nA Lalita Paray, MCIP, RPP Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Planner I Principal Planner — Development Review LP:MM:Id J:\DocomentslDevelopment\D-3700120161PCA 03-16+Report1pca 3_16.tlocx Enclosures 32 THIRD CONCESSION ROAD City Development Department 0 111 JOMAR AVENUE 0 D 0 • • • • • SUBJECT PROPERTY Location Map 0 0 0 a THIRD CON. ROAD CORRIDOR T FILE No: P/CA 03/16 APPLICANT: G. Bevacqua PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:Con 2, N Pt Lot 27, 40R-19660, Pt 5 (845 Third Concession Road) DATE: Jan. 20, 2016 Data Sources: ® Teranet Enter rises Inc. d He suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not a plan of survey. M 5 2013 PAC d ite suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not o pion of Survey. SCALE 1:5,000 PN -RU 33 THIRD CONCESSION ROAD w Z 0 H Q w w E M EXISTING DWELLING 27.5m3.8m r=. 12.2m 4 E N ri N To permit a total lot coverage of all accessory buildings, excluding private detached garages, to be a maximum of 7.3 percent of the lot area 45.3m E M E ti 28.0m E M E N A- 9.1m -*7.Om , zw pQ Q wo T moat f= ` 4.5m 3.0m. PROPOSED ACCESSORY BUILDING 13.4m To permit an accessory building with a maximum height of 4.5 metres 86.7m EXISTING SHED 1.5m E EXISTING COVERED DECK EXISTING UNCOVERED DECK T City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 03/16 APPLICANT: G. Bevacqua PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Con 2. N. Pt. Lot 27, 40R-19660 Part 5 (845 Third Concession Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Jan. 28, 2016 34 City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 03/16 APPLICANT: G. Bevacqua PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:Con 2. N. Pt. Lot 27, 40R-19660 Part 5 (845 Third Concession Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Jan. 28, 2016 cit,I O12 PICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 04/16 Meeting Date: February 17, 2016 From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 04/16 A. Bobat 1833 Misthollow Drive Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 7020/10 to permit a maximum driveway width of 65 percent of the lot frontage; whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 55 percent of the lot frontage. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to recognize an existing driveway that has been widened beyond the maximum permitted driveway width. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a maximum driveway width of 65 percent of the lot frontage to be a major variance that is not desirable for the appropriate use of the land and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and therefore recommends Refusal of the proposed variance. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject property as "Urban Residential — Medium Density Areas" within the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood. The subject property is currently zoned "S -SD -SA -3" — Single, Semi -Detached and Single Attached Residential Zone within Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by Zoning By-law 7020/10. Appropriateness of the Application Maximum Driveway Width Variance • the intent of the maximum driveway width is to ensure that a minimum 45 percent of the front yard is maintained as landscaped open space • the intent of restricting the maximum driveway width is also to accommodate vehicles associated with residential uses while restricting the location and the number of vehicles in the front yard to maintain the residential appearance of the neighbourhood 35 36 Report P/CA 04/16 February 17, 2016 Page 2 • the Zoning By-law restricts the maximum driveway width to 55 percent of the lot frontage, which would allow a driveway width of 5.0 metres • the applicant is proposing to increase the maximum driveway width to 65 percent of the lot frontage, to allow a driveway width of 5.9 metres • the driveway that was constructed with the dwelling was 34 percent of the lot frontage, which was a driveway width of 3.12 metres • the applicant has extended the driveway and additional 2.85 metres, which has a total driveway width of 5.97 metres, which is 65 percent of the lot frontage • the increased driveway width results in a reduction in the landscaped open space in the front yard • the residential appearance of the neighbourhood and streetscape is compromised when a large portion of the front yard is used for parking • it is staff's opinion that a portion of the existing driveway extension can remain on the property, however it must comply with the current zoning by-law requirement of 55 percent of the lot frontage • staff is of the opinion that the proposed increase in driveway width beyond the maximum permitted width is not minor and is undesirable for the development of the property Staff is of the opinion that the proposed increase in driveway width is a major variance that is not desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works • if application refused any works that were Department completed on public property be restored to original condition Date of report: February 11, 2016 Comments prepared by: Amy Emm, MCIP, RPP Planner II AE:MM:Id J:\Docume nls'Developme n10-370012016'PCA 04-16'Repor6P CA 04_16.doc Enclosures Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review 37 RIVE 'DU CULTURAL CENTRE STREET 0 0 O O m MUM SIN . la wawa InnO TALLY STREET - 11111 ��]_ A - amm.100 woe OS _� �F - Iwo A ONO CAROUSEL DRME - • woo 111111_. goo - , lollwow. mi—osGEO owl" w 1 m tn ?-3 STP """ • ""'f a.w EARL GREY z CREEKSIDE PARK LIATRIS DRIVE KALMAR z 0 BLVD D U WILLIAM 3 0 AVE L E 1111111111 1111111111 z z m 111111111111 EINEM Mao MISTHOLLOW DRIVE 011 e� nWO 0 r� IATRIS DRIVE SUBJECT PROPERTY City Development Department Location Map FILE No: P/CA 04/16 APPLICANT: A. Bobat PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 40M-2437 Lot 40, (1833 Misthollow Drive) DATE: Jan. 20, 2016 Data Sources: 115 Teranet Enterprises Inc. and Its euppliers. All rights Reserved. Not o plan of survey. 2013 MPAC end Its suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not o plon of Survey. SCALE 1:5,000 PN -15 38 MISTHOLLOW DRIVE 9.1m v D v 5.9m F r) EXISTING DRIVEWAY I N EXISTING 2 STOREY DWELLING 1 29.zuJ J. 15 N 12 To permit a maximum driveway width of 65 percent of the lot frontage City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 04/16 APPLICANT: A. Bobat PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 40M2437 Lot 40, (1833 Mistholiow Drive) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Jan. 27, 2016 City £71 PICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 05/16 Meeting Date: February 17, 2016 From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 05/16 Lebovic Enterprises Limited 1603 Dusty Drive Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 7022/10, to permit a minimum flanking side yard width of 1.2 metres; whereas the by-law requires minimum flanking side yard width of 2.4 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to recognize an existing two-storey detached dwelling. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a flanking side yard width of 1.2 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the existing dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. Background The subject property is located within a registered plan of subdivision (40M-2495). The Draft Plan of Subdivision SP -2008-09 was approved by the Ontario Municipal Board in a decision dated February 2, 2010. The existing lot fronts onto Dusty Drive, a public road, and flanks Tillings Road. Tillings Road, adjacent to this lot, is a municipal road allowance that has not been legally closed and hence the flankage yard provisions are required under the current Zoning By-law. 39 40 Report P/CA 05/16 February 17, 2016 Page 2 Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject property as `Urban Residential — Medium Density Areas' within. the Duffin heights Neighbourhood. The property is also subject to the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines. The proposed development generally conforms to the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines. The subject property is currently zoned "S -SD -SA -3" Residential Zone within Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-Iaw7022/10. Appropriateness of the Application Flanking Side. Yard Width Variance • the intent of a minimum flanking side yard width is to provide an adequate separation distance between buildings and street activity, and to maintain an adequate landscaped area • the by-law requires a minimum flanking side yard width of 2.4 metres • the requested variance is to recognize a flankage yard width of 1.2 metres to an existing two-storey detached dwelling • the existing flanking side yard width will maintain an adequate separation distance between the dwelling and street activity, as the City does not intend to extend Tillings Road to the north • the existing flanking side yard width maintains an adequate landscaped area • the existing flanking side yard width is in keeping with the character of the existing residential neighbourhood • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works • no concerns Date of report: February 10, 2016 Comments prepared by: Deepak Bhatt, MCIP, RPP Planner II DB:MM:Id J:tDocuments\Development\D-3700t2016'PCA 05-16Report'PCA 05-16.cloc Enclosures Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review 41 TAUNTON ROAD DUSTY DRIVE 111111111111I 1 BRANDY COURT IA 1 ROAD **0111111111 ,$0'uII 11111 1 W W 1- H (n z z z BRUNY AVENUE w SPINNAKER MEWS SHEPWAY MEWS U) 0 I to WINVILLE ROAD EDGECROFT DRIVE n j1) ELMSLEY DRIVE O� SCENIC LANE DRIVE 0 O c z J SUBJECT PROPERTY ZENTS DRIVE HINDU CULTURAL 0 0 U 0 City Development Department Location Map FILE No: P/CA 05/16 APPLICANT: Lebovic Enterprises Limited PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:PIan 40M-2495 Lot 1, (1603 Dusty Drive) DATE: Jan. 22, 2016 Dote Sources: 13: Teranet Enterprises Inc. and Its suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not a plan of survey. 2013 MPAC and its suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not a plan of Survey. SCALE 1:5,000 PN -15 42 { 8.9m PROPOSED 2 STOREY DWELLING—* 9.0m DUSTY DRIVE la TILLINGS ROAD 1.2m To permit a minimum flanking side yard width of 1.2 metres City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 05/16 APPLICANT: Lebovic Enterprises Limited PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 40M-2495 Lot 1, (1603 Dusty Drive) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Jan. 28, 2016 43 1 IMMO:a IMMI MOP \\ krarairawrivivrarmi wria vat'. 11 FIE in 11 11 Jim aisfoisisp_mirlk, «i r 1 OZER MEP 41 2 FRONT (SOUTH) ELEVATION City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 05/16 APPLICANT: Lebovic Enterprises Limited PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 40M-2495 Lot 1, (1603 Dusty Drive) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Jan. 28, 2016 44 City O¢ PICKERINTG Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 06/16 Meeting Date: February 17, 2016 From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 06/16 2450734 Ontario Inc. (Marshall Homes) Limited 1555 & 1575 Kingston Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 6172/03: • to permit a minimum building height of 12.0 metres and 4 storeys; whereas the by-law states that no building, part of a building, or structure that is Tess than 16.0 metres and 6 storeys in height, or greater than 35.0 metres and 12 storeys in height, shall be erected on the lands • to permit buildings to be located outside the building envelope having a minimum setback of 1.8 metres from the Kingston Road lot line; whereas the by-law states that all buildings and structures shall be located entirely within the building envelope having a minimum setback of 4.5 metres from the Kingston Road lot line • to permit buildings to be located outside the building envelope having a minimum setback of 0.8 of a metro from the west lot line; whereas the by-law states that all buildings and structures shall be located entirely within the building envelope having a minimum setback of 4.5 metres from the west lot line • to permit any portion of a building or structure in excess of 11.0 metres in height, to be setback a minimum of 17:0 metres from the southern limits of the "(H)RH/MU-1" zone; whereas the by-law states that any portion of a building or. structure in excess of 11.0 metres in height, shall be setback a minimum of 20.0 metres from the southern limits of the "(H)RH/MU-1" zone • to permit a minimum of 1.0 parking space per dwelling unit for residents be provided both above and below grade; whereas the by-law states that for each multiple dwelling vertical there shall be provided and maintained a minimum 1.2 parking spaces per dwelling unit for residents; all resident parking is to be provided in a below.grade structure • to permit a minimum of 0.2 of a parking space per dwelling unit for visitors; whereas the by-law states that for each multiple dwelling vertical there shall be provided and maintained a minimum of 0.3 of a parking space per dwelling unit for visitors • to permit at grade parking lots to be no closer than 2.5 metres from the southern limit of the "(H)RH/MU-1" Zone; whereas the by-law states that at grade parking lots shall be permitted no closer than 3.0 metres from the limits of the "(H)RH/MU-1" Zone Report P/CA 06/16 February 17, 2016 Page 2 ® to permit at grade parking Tots to be 0.0 metres from the western limit of the "(H)RH/MU-1" Zone; whereas the by-law states that at grade parking lots shall be permitted no closer than 3.0 metres from the limits of the "(H)RH/MU-1" Zone ® to permit at grade parking Tots to be no closer than 2.7 metres from the eastern limit of the "(H)RH/MU-1" Zone; whereas the by-law states that at grade parking lots shall be permitted no closer than 3.0 metres from the limits of the "(H)RH/MU-1" Zone The applicant is requesting approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain Site Plan Approval for a residential development consisting of 136 stacked townhouse units. Recommendation The City Development Department recommends that minor variance application P/CA 06/16 be Deferred in order to allow time for City staff to receive preliminary comments on the Site Plan application and for the application to be brought to the City's Site Plan Advisory Committee. Background On January 29, 2016, the applicant submitted an application for Site Plan Approval to the City of Pickering. The application will be scheduled for the next Site Plan Advisory Committee meeting to consider the proposed site plan, elevations and the associated minor variance application. Date of report: February 10, 2016 Comments prepared by: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review MM:Id J:lDocuments\Development0-3700120161PCA 06-16\Reporl'PCA 06-16.doc Enclosures 45 46 LANE ROAD ROAD • BOULEVARD 0 0 uJ w z 0 0 Z 0 —J J >- 0 0 SUB ECT PROPERTY .n 0 0 DIANA, AL WI TOT LOT PRINCESS OF CIRCLE ESP RpE PICKERING RECREATION COMPLEX WALES PARK Ilii 11 , REYBER ESPLANAD PICKERING C/V/C COMPLEX AND PARK ENTRAL LIBRARY SNE ESP�PNPpE SO'3 \EFENBAKER COURT I City Development Department Location Map FILE No: P/CA 06/16 0 0 Z COURT PORTLAND COURT llIIIIIIIIIIIIJI APPLICANT: 2450734 Ontario Inc. (Marshall Homes) VILLAGE EAST PARK PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:Con 1. Pt. Lot 20, 40R-6095 Part 1, (1555 & 1575 Kingston Road) DATE: Jan. 22, 2016 Data Sources: Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not o plan of survey. _D 2013 MPAC and its suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not o plan of Survey. SCALE 1:5,000 PN -8 To permit buildings to be located outside the building envelope having a minimum setback of 1.8 metres from the Kingston Road lot line S�oN� o\oho 00- /pc� .�Eo-AOR �, 0.0;\_ �/B0 B o t•14-.°6\`-1 /S�\ERNd oAp,o To permit a minimum building height of 12.0 metres and 4 storeys 034 To permit at grade parking lots to be no closer than 2.5 metres from the southern limit of the "(H)RH/MU-1" Zone T D To permit buildings to be located outside the building envelope having a minimum setback of 0.8 of a metre from the west lot line To permit at grade parking lots to be 0.0 metres from the western limit of the "(H)RH/MU-1" Zone To permit any portion of a building or structure in excess of 11.0 metres in height, to be setback a minimum of 17.0 metres from the southern limits of the (H)RH/MU-1" zone BLOCK 4 --- WALK-UP 24 UNRH To permit a minimum of 0.2 of a parking space per dwelling unit for visitors To permit a minimum of 1.0 parking space per dwelling unit for residents be provided both above and below grade P.„E • 1 0 To permit at grade parking lots to be no closer than 2.7 metres from the eastern limit of the "(H)RH/MU-1" Zone 4 City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 06/16 APPLICANT: 2450734 Ontario Inc. (Marshall Homes) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Con 1. Pt. Lot 20, 40R-6095 Part 1, (1555 & 1575 Kingston Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Feb. 4, 2016 48 tEmil 1111 Stu City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 06/16 APPLICANT: 2450734 Ontario Inc. (Marshall Homes) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Con 1. Pt. Lot 20, 40R-6095 Part 1, (1555 & 1575 Kingston Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Feb. 4, 2016 City oce PICKERE\G Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 07/16 Meeting Date: February 17, 2016 From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 07/16 I. & S. Gandhi 220 Finch Avenue Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended: to permit uncovered steps with a height of 1.6 metres in height above grade to project 2.3 metres into the required front yard; whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard ® to permit a maximum lot coverage of 25 percent; whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 20 percent The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct.a two-storey detached dwelling. Recommendation The City Development Department considers uncovered steps with a height of 1.6 metres in height above grade to project 2.3 metres into the required front yard and a maximum lot coverage of 25 percent to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed two-storey detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by February 17, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject lands as "Open Space System - Natural Areas" and "Urban Residential — Low Density Areas" within the Rouge Park Neighbourhood. The subject property is currently zoned "A" — Rural Agricultural Zone within Zoning By-law 3036, as amended. 49 50 Report P/CA 07/16 February 17, 2016 Page 2 Appropriateness of the Application Uncovered Platform and Steps Projecting into the Required Front Yard • the intent of this provision is to provide the opportunity for any stairs and/or a landing platform to encroach into the front yard when needed, to ensure an adequate buffer space between buildings and street activity is provided, and to ensure an adequate landscaped area within the front yard is also provided • the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard • the applicant is proposing uncovered steps not exceeding 1.6 metres in height above grade to project a maximum of 2.3 metres into the required front yard • an adequate buffer space between the proposed stairs and street activity along Finch Avenue will be maintained • the proposed dwelling and covered porch will be set back approximately 12.0 metres from the front lot line, which is the minimum zoning by-law requirement • the proposed uncovered stairs will be unenclosed and will provide an adequate landscaped area between the proposed dwelling and street activity • the proposed stairs will not obstruct the street view of abutting property owners Maximum Lot Coverage Variance • the intent of the maximum lot coverage provision is to ensure that the size, scale and massing of a dwelling, and accessory buildings, are appropriate for the lot size and to ensure an adequate amount of outdoor amenity area remains uncovered by buildings on a lot • the Zoning By-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 20 percent • the applicant has requested a maximum lot coverage of 25 percent • the increase in lot coverage from 20 percent to 25 percent will not change the character of the surrounding neighbourhood • the proposed lot coverage is appropriate for the development of the land as the size and massing of the proposed dwelling will maintain an adequate amount of outdoor amenity area and will be compatible with the existing character within the surrounding neighbourhood Staff are of the opinion that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintain the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Report P/CA 07/16 February 17, 2016 Page 3 Input From Other Sources Toronto and Region Conservation Authority • no objection to the variances proposed • a Natural Heritage Evaluation, revised Site Plan and Building Elevations are required prior to issuance of final approval for the TRCA permit Date of report: February 11, 2016 Comments prepared by: 67? - my Emm, MCIP, RPP Planner II AE:MM:Id J:1DocumentslDevelopment D-3700\2016\PCA 07-161Repod'PCA 07-16.cloc Enclosures /41 Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review 51 52 C.P.R. NATURE HAVEN TOT LOT FINCH NA�RE NP' = :" 13 CRSS W z W SUBJL CT PROPERTY AVENUE - L BED Iil Iliil PLACE 111 11111111111 0 0 z 0 0 O z 0 J City Development Department Location Map FILE No: P/CA 07/16 APPLICANT: I. & S. Gandhi PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:Con 2, S Pt Lot 33, (220 Finch Avenue) DATE: Jan. 25, 2016 Data Sources: O Tercnet Enterprises Inc. and Re euppllers. All rights Reserved. Not a plan of survey. al 2013 MPAC and its suppliers. All nghts Reserved. Not a plan of Survey. SCALE 1:5,000 PN -14 53 To permit uncovered steps with a height of 1.6 metres to project 2.3 metres into the required front yard .Q Ty • PATIO AREA PROPOSED 2 STOREY DWELLING nl To permit a maximum lot coverage of 25 percent a co 32.8m FINCH AVENUE City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 07/16 APPLICANT: I. & S. Gandhi PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Con 2, S Pt Lot 33, (220 Finch Avenue) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Jan. 27, 2016 54 ��� IIIII1II11 ,, �■■� 1 t l I I I I I 1 I I 1( 1■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■ i■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1■■ IIIIIIIIIIiIiI 11■■1111■■■■■■■►I■■■■■"j '■■�Il1111i1l II1 I■■ ■■1111■■■■■1■■■■' Vi ,1111-11 11 i II IIIIII(I IIf �IlllllII III „,1„1,llllll Ill ■■■■■■■■■■11■' `_���■■■■, 1111_■D%■■■■■■■■C �'!�■� ®I■■■/rte■1111■L UM" PROPOSED SOUTH (FRONT) ELEVATION City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 07/16 APPLICANT: I. & S. Gandhi PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Con 2, S Pt Lot 33, (220 Finch Avenue) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Jan. 27, 2016 Cli1 o1 PICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 08/16 Meeting Date: February 17, 2016 From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 08/16 M. Bosnjak 1441 Highbush Trail Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres, and a maximum lot coverage of 34 percent; whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres, and a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct a two-story detached dwelling. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the proposed minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres, and a maximum lot coverage of 34 percent to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed two-storey detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by February 17, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject property as "Urban Residential — Low Density Areas" within the Woodlands Neighbourhood. The subject property is currently zoned "R4" — Fourth Density Residential Zone within Zoning By-law 3036, as amended. 55 56 Report P/CA 08/16 February 17, 2016 Page 2 Appropriateness of the Applications Side Yard Setback Variances • the intent of a minimum side yard setback is to provide an appropriate separation between structures on abutting properties in order to maintain pedestrian access, and to accommodate grading, drainage and residential services such as air conditioning units and utility meters and to maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood • the applicant has requested a variance to reduce the minimum side yard width from 1.5 metres to 1.2 metres • the proposed side yard setbacks will provide an adequate separation between the dwelling and the property line to accommodate pedestrian access, grading, drainage and residential utility services • the proposed side yard setbacks will provide an appropriate setback and separation from abutting properties with respect to privacy, views and openness • the proposed side yard setbacks will maintain the character of the existing residential community as other redeveloped properties along Highbush Trail have been approved to have a minimum side yard setback of 1.2 metres Maximum Lot Coverage Variances • the intent of the maximum lot coverage provision is to ensure that the size, scale and massing of a dwelling, and accessory buildings is appropriate for the lot size and to ensure an adequate amount of outdoor amenity area remains uncovered by buildings on a lot • the applicant has requested a variance to increase the maximum lot coverage from 33 percent to 34 percent • the increase in lot coverage will provide for the appropriate development of the land as the size and massing of the proposed dwelling will be in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighbourhood • the proposed development will maintain a sufficient amount of outdoor amenity area that will remain uncovered and unobstructed on the lot Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintain the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works • no comments or concerns with the application Report P/CA 08/16 February 17, 2016 Page 3 Date of report: February 10, 2016 Comments prep ed by: //h 44/ /ICK is b�ir� Am mm, MCIP, RPP Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Planner II AE:MM:Id J:IDocumentslDevelopment0-3700\2D16\PCA 013-16V2epodPPCA 08-16.doc Enclosures Principal Planner — Development. Review 57 58 AUTUMN LAURIER w — ,...7... 0 cc SHEPPARD w cc O ROUGEMOUNT 1 City Development Department Location Map PETTICOAT CRE: :RARY AND 111 • OMMUN/TY CENTRE SHEPPARD w AVENUE DRIV SUNDOWN m 0 K 0 z 0 RESCENT PLACE STEEPLE ERNIE STROU PA FIRE No. FILE No: P/CA 08/16 APPLICANT: M. Bosnjak PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:PIan 816 Lot 108, 109, 40R-28904 Part 2 (1441 Highbush Trail) DATE: Jan. 25, 2016 Dote Sources: D Teranet Enterprises Inc. and Its suppliers. All rights Reanrved. Not a plan of survey. 112 2013 MPAC end Its suppliant. All rights Reserved. Not a pion of Survey. SCALE 1:5,000 PN -6 E co co wZ 5I. 0) O N 0< 0_ z E C a) E E N E � 0 a L • 4 c •Z 0 N O � W _ a 721 O • OI— W a N Q S9 0) 1.2m 15.2' NGNBUSN ROI._ 9Z 0 E c a� � U E0 X c0 - E co 0 E � N 0> 00 Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 08/16 2 T N cd 0 O co N cc O _O co 0 O J O O C O z 0 W 0 N 0 0 Q. 5 9 O N o co N w 0 0 z w LL 0 w 1- 1- 0 a0 z w w 0 LL 0 J 0 w 5Z w ag w ✓ ▪ a 0 00 ww O � 0 w 2 w J 0") D J LL 60 ..I.I.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 .I.I.I.I.I.I.I..u1.I.IO.1.1.. 11111n111u1111u11111111111lIII11t1111111111111111111111k 411111111111111 u11111111111t 111 I Iu111 u11111111I I Il j U 111111111► IIlIuI 11IU11111111I1n1111111111111111111111111In1111111I11t11 41111111111II1!11111Ig1111111111/1111u11111111111111111111111/11uS11. 4111111011111111•1111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111N11111.11nn111171u1111ng111nn11un1111t11nit111u111111t111111111►illr UTI. 1111111111 711n1111•1111u11111/111 11.11uI1nu11111•iIIIl1In 1111�}II 111111111I111111111111111111n1111n111111111111/liulr `ill► 111' i� Timm. 11111111111t 11111111111111111111ufi111 III►. R7� 11111111111!1111111111111IIu11111111111t11:IIID IIL11111I1111t7111111111111nh1111111111u1111' 111' 71111111111i111u111nii1111111111111i1111 111111. ,11111111111•31111 1111111111111111111/111, . rx 11111. 11111I11111114IIIn11111111111151111 • �I:oI��1�1n� �II��I��II�Vi��ltl��s`.•" t� With Air Ii 1n ' 111111111111 sM • --- j NI NI - -' IIS' -- SIN111111111 1111 III ll './11111111111.° ` ' �--- 1111111111 _, u/IIIIIIIUIIUIIIIIIIIlnIIUIigliimp111111111.11. �_, - 4- --1- boy _per rv�r_� =•1�•-1�1•ja 1G es MEM cO CID Eat C21 1111111111 phhinou NUR I 1e� 1 ■p 11 Eg ��a � —�. r1 11 11 1 �1 1■MN= MI MI Ell NE N, 1 =NC NUM EE' MI NI Ell NI (Ell MI mm nage .roc Mena 111151 ems SECTIONAL Dorn 8 = 8 SECTIONAL DOOR FRONT (WEST) ELEVATION Il .1�1 1uIIIl1Ull■ 41111111111111111111111111111111111 41111111111111111111111111111111111 411111111111111111111111111111111111111 /I111I11111111i1111111111I1111111111 �I�j((1ll r'�jI I 11 I i 11111111�11��11���� d1.1111111111111111111111111111111 111111 1111 11111 :,:i�111u111111�11111/1��n� (nl01ni1111n PROM 210j ASPHALT SHINGLES ALUMINUM FASCIA AND GUTTER ZEN 1•12 POOP M.V. Cita 1,1,10 1 1 ,131.10 mn uldiliinnnn.,1d1.I.nnInlnlGn�l .T.7T8,81 =11111 111111111 I I .-111.81'1'. -I II -1-I'-FPI .iii?ili SMINZIPASIFS 61111111111= _' ,:_ MAUI r 111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111 len T REAR (EAST) ELEVATION City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 08/16 APPLICANT: M. Bosnjak PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 816 Lot 108, 109, 40R-28904 Part 2 (1441 Highbush Trail) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Jan. 28, 2016 61 ;ANN? A l111.1.111ID 11.1 1 1 1 1 1.111 _i111111111i1111111 1 . 11 1 XVIII 1111 11 11:1111.11 111XV 11.11 111 1Iii .111 11 11 IL.111111/I11/1 11 111111111 1111111 111 7111 1111111111 7 IIIIP I ■ 1 r11 I 1111111111111111211111 11111 11 121211 I II t11 .111111 1111111111111:111 111111 11 111111 11 11111 II ■ 11.111 ■ 111111 11.1 :1 1V I11 11XV 11 111 1I. 1 111111 1111111111 1 111112E1111 8111 .1111 1111111111111 1111111 1111' 1 1/1 11111 1 1 111111111 11111111/1111111 Wn111 1 ■ 11111 N 1111111111111.1 1111111111 XV11 11 11 11 111 I NC a11a ■ 11111 1111 If11111 1 111 11111 1111 1 1111111 NW Win I11 111111111111711117 111 111 11111 111111111111111111 1511111111111131•11 prom=. - - �ai+K$ II 11 11 ram m rateasrar gllll -112/2/li "•_. Jr _1111* 11..W6iLSA21rr/il17121 i%i212111, IAC f- Art- KlAWpEIe illilllllllllllll IIIIIIIII& 11111111111 11111 i110a SIDE (SOUTH) ELEVATION 11�1� I1 71 11 1 1 I .•I II 111 .01111111111I1111111111111IIIIIII1111111 1111I111111111I1111111111111II11I11111I111111 AiIalialitair111 1 i,IiIIIiit•11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,g11111111111111111111111111111111111 C1:III111111I1 I1I111I11I1111II11I111 11I11I11I11111III11.II1IIII 11111111 1111111.11111111 1111111111111111 1111I11I11111anutll 1 11111 1 1111111 1111 11111 11111111 1111 I/II IIICIIIg111111 1 lm nw i ------_-- w --ae e. IT •1Rrawrael�swmnnmm�n 11R. . -�� � o� �Illllllllllllllll,o „di 1III III111111111 111111 aj FCAST J SIDE (NORTH) ELEVATION City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 08/16 APPLICANT: M. Bosnjak PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 816 Lot 108, 109, 4.0R-28904 Part 2 (1441 Highbush Trail) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: 'Jan. 28, 2016 62 Citi o¢� PICKERINTG Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 09/16 Meeting Date: February 17, 2016 From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject:. Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 09/16 D. Artukovic 1443 Highbush Trail Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres, and a maximum lot coverage of 35 percent; whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres, and a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct a two-story detached dwelling. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the proposed minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres, and a maximum lot coverage of 35 percent to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed two-storey detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by February 17, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject property as "Urban Residential — Low Density Areas" within the Woodlands Neighbourhood. The subject property is currently zoned "R4" — Fourth Density Residential Zone within Zoning By-law 3036, as amended. Report P/CA 09/16 February 17, 2016 63 Page 2 Appropriateness of the Applications Side Yard Setback Variances • the intent of a minimum side yard setback is to provide an appropriate separation between structures on abutting properties in order to maintain pedestrianaccess, and to accommodate grading, drainage and residential services such as air conditioning units and utility meters and to maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood • the applicant has requested a variance to reduce the minimum side yard width from 1.5 metres to 1.2 metres. • the proposed side yard setbacks will provide an adequate separation between the dwelling and the property line to accommodate pedestrian access, grading, drainage and residential utility services • the proposed side yard setbacks will provide an appropriate setback and separation from abutting properties with respect to privacy, views and openness • the proposed side yard setbacks will maintain the character of the existing residential community as other redeveloped properties along Highbush Trail have been approved to have a minimum side yard setback of 1.2 metres Maximum Lot Coverage Variances • the intent of the maximum lot coverage provision is to ensure that the size, scale and massing of a dwelling, and accessory buildings is appropriate for the lot size and to ensure an adequate amount of outdoor amenity area remains uncovered by buildings on a lot • the applicant has requested a variance to increase the maximum lot coverage from 33 percent to 35 percent the increase in lot coverage will provide for the appropriate development of the land as the size and massing of the proposed dwelling will be in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighbourhood • the proposed development will maintain a sufficient amount of outdoor amenity area that will remain uncovered and unobstructed on the lot Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintain the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works • no comments or concerns with the application 64 Report P/CA 09/16 February 17, 2016 Page 3 Date of report: February 10, 2016 Comments • repared by: /7) Amy Emm, MCIP, RPP Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Planner 11 AE:MM:Id J:Documents'Development\D-3700\2016 W CA 09-16\RepodtPCA 09-16.doc Enclosures Principal Planner— Development Review m • mon MN __ ■ ■ 65 _-_ PNumm =RINI Pmerinir main AUR ER 11111011111111111111111111111H =MI AVENUE SHEPPARD latti 6" II la EMM O MIL MIK IIMIL `� �_ - WrAM 111=111— In MI= ism mmma ,� 0 ROUGEMOUNT IMMIMmwm JECT PERTY o ROUGE HILL :111111►� ROAD PL / I /COAT CRE RARY AND OMMUNITY CENTRE SHEPPARD w > 11..11 NMI AVENUE DRIVE /ammo "ImmoSUNDOWN INN m 0 0 Z 0 CRESCENT -� 11111111111 11111111111 Ore IP 0 0 0 J PLACE STEEPLE 11111111 NMI EEPL HILL COMMUNI SLE CHURC ERNIE STRO opt �O '0�\GSI PA FIRE No. 4 City Development Department Location Map FILE No: P/CA 09/16 APPLICANT: D. Artukovic PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:PIan 816 Pt Lot 108, 109, 40R-28904 Part 1 (1443 Highbush Trail) DATE: Jan. 25, 2016 Data Sources:' Teranet Enterprises Inc, and Its suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not a plan of survey. ,, 2013 MPAC and Its suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not a plan of Survey. SCALE 1:5,000 PN -6 67 •1111M11 �1 ii1i1i►iiil�1111i�iiiiirEi►iiiiliili ill. IlI111I11111III1111l(1111I►1111 /11111111111111110III11111i/11. .111111111111111111 111111111I1111111I1111u111111111111► .11111111111111111111In1111111I1111111111u11111I/Il1I 11116. r1111111111111111(In1m111I11111mn1mnI111►nmmmnl►. 11111111111111111 1111111111111110111111111111111111111111/1111111111. 11111n11111I111u111n1m1umn111111m1llminr gmnlll. 1111111111111111111111111111I/1111P111111N 7111111, A 9111111111I11I111111111n11uI111GI111111V a, 11111111. ego 111111113111111111111111111.111111111111ll111111 ' �— — •� lII 11IL .151m_ 111►nmuu11m1►ulmn 11I111u1 �®-& 1111111111111111k. 111111mn 1111111111u11111r ��vs loom �--.111111111111. I1 . —�--- .11M111_®_1i nnm111nInu1►IIm1n lm,o® s A11111111, 1, �-� .w,Irmin_I�.p 11111111111111111111111111' i�-.I—.71#41,. .. I111111► 1. /�_Bo■if�1.m.m/�1I.l�a®i�•''q�AL1111111 o���1-� ,u1n.18 •1 . _1E--, t Tillow Ully �1 I� i=ter_ NE am rza NI 2 i�=,, —A.—a NMI —1 I®. — I. _ ME CI= 2 tit o� = N ical■ �,� .I sM .I_. O..I Sao 1111111 NMI mea@r, MI NM ?Ivy a MI MI o' MI i� Ii_ NE im :� �B - ra ii fiuiiiiiIIIIIIiiu..uiI11111Ip! ®._mom,®Gm - �, NEN NM... MOWN Z�'AI1111111111111111111111,1111111INIMIS1111111111111111ll �~111111/111111111111111111111111111111111111116. ort._�.E i 11111111111111111.I�lu1mn11l�lumlunrin11l111i►. Pi 111-021111.1 ree� % 11 !I (I 11 11 11 1 1 =a ---m ►e AVMS ra- _�IIImp nmIwpm JIM hIIIIII III IIIIII1111 111111111 1 1 V . �� e' iiEiiflu1 o IIIIIII I IIIIIIAll • odium FRONT (WEST) ELEVATION 111A111 1 111 1111► 1111i1111I Ilu1111111111111. 11101111 .1111i11111111111. uII111IIIIII .111n1I1111111I16 IlnlllII11un1 n1IIIIDnI11111I6. IIIIIIIIIIn111I11111.IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111111111111111101111111111111.��'��.I I I I"III 1111411 1 I)). I I II,II'1t1�11�111i1► 1II11111111II1111I111/I11II1nIIIII1IIIIIl1141► u1I11111I1111u1n111I11111111111111 1 1 ►111111'. BRICK FACING oe. UII11111111111111I1 - i 11111111111111111 Cal —mv— 1111111111111111111111p,E��—x!11111111111 I—v. ,6� fitat II'II 111111111 I'll III I. iirinnrfirrrr .1: VI I • -I.1 .1..11.. _ .,- ... 1... -r REAR (EAST) ELEVATION City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 09/16 APPLICANT: D. Artukovic PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 816 Lot 108, 109, 40R-28904 Part 3 (1443 Highbush Trail) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Jan. 28, 2016 68 11-1 1 1 1/111111.1111I111111111 31111111111111.111111111131111.1111.11111111111111k. 111111/1111111111111111 111 11I1111111111111G111.111111111111►.mU1nn1lun111111 nnnntItuII►mniiuul1I 111IiLImIIII111111111Ii111 I I111 illj1Iii11i1111Il.I11 mW1u111I11111111111I1111III11i111111111111111111111.111 11111111111IIII1YlnrinI111111 Elllli11llollilljI IIun�luniinilm 11111 IIIIils1IJI11 LP7 [I111111IIII iIIIj 111111Ii111111� 1111 Ii. 111'1111111/1 11 111111/111111/111111111/1111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 1 mutism um SII iii iimiiiu o mni imi nclin imi Nidi nu111/11m111111I fl 111111nmIIuulIIII IIiuiltIu jliul%Inuini 11 1111113_umul111ll1unl1rn1110III111uj1n1111u11111.11111111 1111 11111111111111111 IG 1 II/111 I J1liY 111111 au "br ifflDrC� ii169111LP�l I _ _ :. I 9114.. a a- 9SY1Rf� ame iewara4PilBASivi iv • IIII111I _ — g tdM � - - li 1111MPll�1p11d, .M_ of 116156110151911.316MINTRANIMSWArdligm-71 141:1b�y111WJ96R7O1Rl1ldiib`Y6Pe�• om. }.{ - r tier _ T: mil IAl etii llli�� r 1 •_ e -1; -L--=-3--I :in or= SIDE (NORTH) ELEVATION ALUUNNUU FASCIA Al 11111 111111111I1I11I1I1I111 111111111111 1111111111 IIj 11111111111 11_111 i1 IIn111Inig111�i 1st111 hill 111►11111 II1111111111111111111111111111111111111111.1111 11111 111111/111111I11111111111111I 1nWm111. 111111 11111111111111111111111111 11111II•Iii 111h.. 11111111111I1I1111111111I111I1111I1111I1111I1111I11IL1.11111/11 11IIIll1I1111mmu1111u111/u11n1mu1m1._111 II1 11111imn1111111111 m11.11mn1111I1ui11 .. UI III1 1111111I1111111IIu1111 1111 111111111111111111111111 1111.. 111111111111 I11I11111111IIIl111I\nI1 I01111111111111n1nIIIIunII1111111II11.,- NBGUTTERI1111I1111I11111111111I11111111111II11111111111111/11111111 m11ru1111111i KETAL. FNSICNC 24' STONE RETURN BRICK SOIIF.EA COURSE -TIP. BRICK FACING 111111111 SILL 111111 11111111�______olllllilliae� o�o_�_:Iilll 1111r� I. 1 �� o o �o Z• o so_s�l'�r o`I 111 IIIIiI�-�o��o�Nor SIDE (SOUTH) ELEVATION City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 09/16 APPLICANT: D. Artukovic PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 816 Lot 108, 109, 40R-28904 Part 3 (1443 Highbush Trail) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Jan. 28, 2016 PICKERING Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 10/16 Meeting Date: February 17, 2016 From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 10/16 Marshall Homes (Copperfield) Ltd. Nordane Drive Application The, applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 7274/13, to permit a minimum lot frontage of 7.2 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to facilitate the development of a semi-detached dwelling on a lot. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a minimum lot frontage of 7.2 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed lot configuration, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by February 17, 2017 or this decision shall become null and void. Background The applicant has submitted an application for Part Lot Control for the creation of future residential lots fronting Nordane Drive. Through the review of the proposed lots it was determined that the subject lands (Part 6 and 11, 40R-29047) do not comply with the minimum lot frontage requirements of the Zoning By-law. Approval of this Minor Variance Application will ensure zoning compliance for the creation of the future residential lots. 69 70 Report P/CA 10/16 February 17, 2016 Page 2 Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject property as `Urban Residential— Low Density Areas' within the Highbush Neighbourhood. The subject property is currently zoned "SD -A" Residential Semi -Detached Dwelling zone, within Zoning By-law 3036, as amended By-law 7274/13. Appropriateness of the Application Reduced Lot Frontage Variance • the intent of the minimum lot frontage requirement is to ensure a usable lot size that is compatible with the neighbourhood • .the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 7.5 metres, the lot frontage shall be the distance between the side lot lines measured on a line 7.5 metres back from the front lot line and parallel to it • the applicant is proposing a lot frontage of 7.2 metres • the required lot frontage of 7.5 metres is provided on a line 8.6 metres back from the front lot line and parallel to it • the proposed lot frontage is consistent with the existing and proposed lotting pattern established along Nordane Drive • the reduced lot frontage of 7.2 metres will maintain a usable lot size and allow for the construction of a semi-detached dwelling that is compatible and in keeping with the neighbourhood character along Nordane Drive • the applicant intends to comply with all other zone provisions • the requested lot frontage is minor in nature and meets the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law Date of report: February 10, 2016 Comments prepared by: Deepak Bhatt, MCIP, RPP Planner II DB:MM:Id J:1DocumentslDevelopment0-3700 2016\PCA 10-16'Report\PCA 10-16.doc Enclosures , n 14,011t.- Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review 71 OVE D z w O cc Lu z • PINE w 0 w z Olt MELDRON SANDHURST SUB PROP E 0 0 GROVE AVENUE z z ROCKWOOD PROHILL ST. 0 ROCKWOOD W z w w 0 0 O O G m 1- 0 z afty Our GROVE &\11111111111111 11111Pilii MOSSBROOK MIME ISII1I1I ` SQUARE MIME 011111111 11.161 z m 0 WESTCREEK I I WESTCREEK PUBLIC SCHOOL • STREET 0 z Lu �II TRANQUIL CRT. w w 0 H w W VALLEYV/E PARK BUTTERNUT CRT U u \� w m 0 0 0 z 0 0 O cc Z 0 J L X111 STI City Development Department Location Map FILE No: P/CA 10/16 APPLICANT: Marshall Homes (Copperfield) Ltd. PROPERTY'DESCRIPTION:PtBlk4a 40R2 800 Part3,45S6 Pt 1,2 and Plan 40M1700 Biks 45, ave & Except 40R-28022 Pt 8-10, 12,13,17,18,21,22 (Nordane Drive) DATE: Jan. 25, 2016 Doto Sources: Teranet Enterprises Inc. and Its suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not a plan of survey. ID 2013 MPAC and Rs suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not a plan of Survey. SCALE 1:5,000 PN -10 72 Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 1 0/1 6 O O co ti N O _ m 0 1) N O O CT C O ca 0 ca N i--� 0 O) O) N cc O ca N O J 0 0) N C0 ca a z 0 1— CC U N LJJ 0 CC 1.1.1 a 0 CC a 4) •L 0 a) ca O Z_ N N N C C9 N O O 0 N N 0 O N CC 0 a a) U W a) (1) If) C9 t ca 0 DATE: May 28, 2013 z Z w w 0 0 U x H O z w 0 O U- 1,1! S w Z� 0. a1- xa I-0_ 0 OO wz a� Oa w OJ Lu UW CO ❑