HomeMy WebLinkAboutSeptember 21, 1992
22/92
134
COUNCIL MINUTES
A Meeting of the Pickering Town Council was held on Monday,
September 21, 1992 at 7:30 p.m.
PRESENT:
-
Mayor W. Arthurs
COUNCILLORS :
M. Brenner
E. Higdon
R. Johnson
E. Pistritto
K. Van Kempen
D. Wellman
ALSO PRESENT:
N.C. Marshall
B. Taylor
N. Carroll
T. Melymuk
- Town Manager
- Town Clerk
- Director of Planning
- Deputy Director of Planning
(I)
ADOPTION OF MINUTES
special Council of July 6, 1992
Regular meeting of August 4, 1992
Special Council of August 5, 1992.
8
(II)
PRESENTATION
Councillor Higdon spoke concerning the presentation to be made
by artist Barry Smylie of a Limited Edition print to Mayor
Arthurs for the Town's participation in the Frenchman's Bay
Festival.
(III)
DELEGATIONS
The following delegations addressed Council with respect to the
Bramalea Application pertaining to the Altona Forest:
1.
Peter Landolt, representing Frank Fisco stated that
Mr. Fisco has received a draft approval for the
subdivision but cannot get zoning approval because of
the Official Plan. He reported that Mr. Fisco
supports the Official Plan Amendment.
2.
Milton Rusonik, representing Oscar Pillersdorf of 1727
Altona Road asked for Council to adopt the Official
Plan Amendment #79 as recommended by the Planning
Staff.
~
3.
e
4.
5.
6.
7.
8
8.
9.
8
~
22/92
135
Victor Rudik, 1855 Rosebank Road, also representing
his neighbours, Mr. & Mrs. Robert Gordon, stated that
there has always been plans for single family detached
dwellings on Rosebank. Plans are now for higher
density and a separate school site. He urged Council
to formally request an amendment to this proposal
indicating on a map and text the commitment to single
family dwellings. He requested that Council follow
through on the previous commitment.
Joan Donaghey, 1764 Rosebank Road requested Council's
support of the Official Plan Amendment #79. She
stated that there has been numerous environmental
studies done on Altona Forest and it is time for a
decision. She also stated that the plan is well
balanced between construction and the environment.
Andrew Talpash, 1849 Appleview Road stated that he has
enjoyed the Altona Forest for biking, hiking and
walking and feels that this development would destroy
the parkland.
Matt Milner, representing Dunbarton High School stated
that he is a member of the Environmental Club and
voiced their concern with the development of the
Altona Forest forcing the wildlife into a small corner
where they ultimately could not survive.
Katherine Murray, representing the Friends of the
Altona Forest and Petticoat Creek stated that Friends
of the Altona Forest is a non-profit organization.
She re-affirmed their opposition to the development of
the Altona Forest. She stated that this item was
referred to the Ministry of the Environment. In May
of 1991, the Ministry of the Environment responded to
Council on the Altona Forest and asked Council to
refer their concerns to various ministries. She
requested that the Official Plan Amendment not be
considered since comments have not been received from
various agencies. She stated that she would be
pleased to discuss this further at another time.
Brian Henshaw, 843 Liverpool Road, representing the
Pickering Naturalists stated that there are many
people within Pickering interested in what is
happening with the Altona Forest. He stated that
according to some experts the entire forest should be
preserved. He reported that the Ministry of Natural
Resources has made a presentation to Council on the
importance of the Altona Forest. He stated that the
Council should make every effort to preserve the
Altona Forest and ask other agencies to help.
Dr. Ron Orenstein, representing J. Murray Spiers of
1815 Al tona Road stated that Mr. Spiers moved from
Toronto 44 years ago to get away from all forms of
pollution. The upgrading along Altona Road has added
pollution. He stated that development of this
property is an irreversible decision and that a proper
environmental study should be undertaken.
10.
8
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
8
16.
17.
18.
19.
8
22/92
136
Steve Marshall, representing Save The Rouge Valley
System stated that many members of this organization
live in Pickering. He reported that the Altona Forest
is in the Petticoat Creek watershed but that it is in
a system that helps the Rouge. If the Official Plan
Amendment is approved, it will destroy a natural
heritage. He remarked that very few forests are of
the size to sustain the animals. The Altona Forest is
a good size.
Lorne Almack, representing the Pickering Rural
Association stated his support of the Friends of
Altona Forest and felt that the Official Plan
Amendment should be tabled. He stated that the
Province has not reported on the environmental
impact. He suggested that the developer should
prepare a more compact community, preserving 90
hectares for forest.
Lloyd Thomas, a concerned resident of Whitevale stated
his support for a full environmental assessment.
Joe Sopta, 1818 Rosebank Road stated that the trees on
his property are dying due to the amount of garbage.
He supports the Official Plan Amendment #79 which will
provide for forest preservation.
Dr. Zoran Pejovic, representing his mother who resides
at 1818 Rosebank Road stated that she has been unable
to upgrade her property and urges the Council to make
a decision.
Kevin Ashe, Trustee representing the Seperate School
Board voiced his concern over the overcrowding in the
present schools. Reported the urgent need for a new
school in the Pickering West area. He stated that the
Board had requested an allocation of funds back in
1987 from the Government and it was approved. He
urged Council to move forward on this amendment
application.
Jim Mccafferty, Trustee representing the Seperate
School Board also voiced his concern over the
overcrowding in the present schools. He stated his
support of the proposed amendment.
Sid Cassell, 1905 Altona Road representing 20 of 32
landowners in the Highbush area urged the Council to
make a positive decision on the amendment
application. He stated that the land is now in
private ownership and it is being used by motorbikes
and snowmobiles. There are no sewers or services and
unless the Official Plan Amendment is approved their
homes will remain in disrepair.
Mario Polsinelli, 1826 Rosebank Road requested that
Council support the Official Plan Amendment.
Frank Albanese, representing Julia Albanese of 1830
Rosebank Road urged the Council to make a decision.
There is no water on the property, the natural
underground springs have dried up and they are unable
to hook-up to Town water. He stated that dirt bikes
are destroying the forest. He requested Council to
make a decision and accept the proposal of the
Planning Department.
20.
8
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
8
26.
27.
28.
8
22/92
137
Don Given, Consultant representing Landford Acres
Limited stated his support of the staff recommendation
with the qualification that there be compensation for
land needed for extra park. Landford is willing to
compromise as long as the issue of compensation is
addressed. He stated that a decision should be made
because the issue has been around for many years.
Janet Foster, representing M.T.R.C.A. stated that the
staff has been dealing with the Altona Forest issue
with the Town, the Ministry of Natural Resources and
the Ministry of the Environment for many years. The
Altona Forest was identified as an environmentally
sensitive area back in 1982. The M.T.R.C.A. has found
that limited development is appropriate along east
side of the Altona Forest.
Anna Mariani, 526 Charnwood Court representing the
C.P.T.A. of St. Monica's Seperate School stated their
concern over the overcrowding in the schools and
requested Council to make a decision. She stated that
st. Monica's School was built for 425 students but it
now has 744. If this application was approved it
would allow for children to walk to school and also
give them a safe playing field.
Christian Bochert, 1812 Rosebank Road urged Council to
approve the Official Plan Amendment.
Heinz Wensing, 1923 Altona Road spoke in support of
the Official Plan Amendment.
Gordon Potts, 844 Vicki Drive spoke in support of the
retention of the Altona Forest. He feels that the
existing residents should be serviced and allowed to
upgrade their homes. People have the opportunity to
study animals in their natural habitat which will be
destroyed if developers are allowed to build.
Anna Rieksteins, 1944 Rosebank Road requested Council
to support the Official Plan Amendment, not to table,
defer or refer again.
The following delegation addressed
respect to the Steeple Hill Application:
Council
with
Lorelei Jones, representing Sandbury Land
stated that Sandbury have no problem with
of the laundromat and the private club but
approval.
Corporation
the removal.
want speedy
The following delegations addressed Council with
respect to the draft plan of subdivision of Bramalea
Limited west of Pinegrove Ave:
John Whitehead, representing Bramalea Limited stated
their support of all revisions with exception of
expansion of ANSI. He requested that Council pass a
resolution to clarify the ANSI to the west. He asked
for Council's support of the Planning Report.
29.
8
30.
31.
32.
33.
8
34.
35.
36.
37.
8
38.
22/92
138
Konrad Wanner, 1812 Pinegrove Avenue stated that he is
not against sensible development. He stated his
concern with this development being built only 275
yards from the dump. Concerned with the health and
safety of the children. He feels that Pinegrove is
unable to manage the amount of traffic that will come
out of such a development and asked Council to limit
the construction to a minimum.
Madeline Carruthers, 1472 Old Forest Road requested
Council to preserve the Highbush Area by holding off
with development.
Dieter Daues, 1844 Pinegrove Avenue stated his concern
with this development being built so close to the
dump. Approximately 40,000 gallons of toxic sludge was
disposed of in the dump per day which has created an
alarming situation. Until Metro can guarantee that
there is no present or future threat from liquid
waste, no development should take place.
Elaine Hughes, representing Heinz Daues requested
Council vote against development and save Altona
Forest. She stated that Bramalea are not in a good
financial standing and will sell lands if the
subdivision is refused.
John Davis, 1770 Pinegrove Avenue stated that Metro
have asked that all new homeowners of the Bramalea
Development sign a waiver stating that they
acknowledge there may be problems from the dump. The
ground water at the rear of his lands may be
polluted. He stated that the Pinegrove Forest is an
intregal part of the Rouge system. He requested that
Council hold off on making any decision.
Veronica Dunn, 1796 Pinegrove Avenue stated her
concern with the suspected toxic waste contaminated
area. She felt that the water levels may rise due to
fill being trucked into the new development. She
urged Council to reject this proposal.
Stephanie Fillingham, 1820 Pinegrove Avenue stated
that she previously bought a Bramalea home which
required grading before they moved in. She is
concerned with the amount of traffic which will be
created from such a development.
Crystal Garrick, 1851 Pinegrove Avenue stated that all
of Pickering will be affected by the loss of the
Pinegrove Forest. She felt that the Council was being
pressured by the O.M.B. hearing. She stated her
concern with the potential density if legislation is
passed allowing basement apartments.
Pierre Herbert, 1830 Pinegrove Avenue stated his
concern with the proximity of the dump and tree
preservation. He feels the development is too dense
for the area.
Brian Houghton, 1786 Pinegrove Avenue reported that
there are financial considerations such as major
improvements to roads which go well beyond the
development charges. He stated that these lands are
under investigation by the Province and have been
recommended for preservation by the Rouge Valley
Committee. He asked Council to reject this
development.
39.
40.
8
41.
42.
(IV)
22/92
139
Paul Krejcik, 1753 Woodview Avenue asked that Council
take into consideration the standard of living of
those in the surrounding area. He felt that this
proposal would cause too much traffic and requested
Council limit this development to the original
proposal.
Dr. Don Roden, 1816 Pinegrove Avenue stated that this
development does not consider the present landowners.
The proposed plan is too dense, would create too much
traffic and would lower their property values. He
requested that Council reject this proposal until to
see if Province designates this area as significant.
Eva Szabo, 1766 Pinegrove Avenue stated that there is
no market for more houses. There is not a proper
infrastructure to accommodate this development.
Mrs. Francis, 1828 Pinegrove Avenue remarked that
Council must see the area as it is to appreciate it's
beauty. She stated that the Pinegrove Forest protects
the residents from the adverse affects of the dump.
This development would create too much traffic for
Pinegrove Avenue and the Valley would be unable to
hold it. A market study should be completed to see if
the development is viable.
RESOLUTIONS
Resolution #141/92 - See Appendix #1
8
Moved by Council Wellman
Seconded by Councillor Johnson
That the Report of the Executive Committee Meeting of September
14, 1992, be adopted.
CARRIED
Resolution #142/92 - See Appendix #2
Moved by Councillor Higdon
Councillor Wellman
That the Report of the Planning Committee Meeting of September
17, 1992, be adopted with the following amendments:
Item #1 was amended to delete
amusement as a permitted use.
the
laundromat
and
place
of
Item #2 was amended to add Condition #16 to read as follows:
8
22/92
140
"16.
That Planning staff meet with Bramalea and the
Ministry of Natural Resources in an attempt to reach
an agreement on the delineation of an ANSI within
Block 271 of the Town Recommended Plan. Should an
agreement be reached between Bramalea Limited, the
Town and the Ministry of Natural Resources that a
westerly shift in the ANSI boundary is appropriate,
then modifications to the plan may occur respecting
the westerly extension of lotting along Streets "C",
"D", and "E". Such lotting expansion shall not
increase the total unit yield of the plan beyond 304
units in the absence of a school on site or 272 units
if a school is located on site. Further, Town
Council's conditions of approval shall be considered
to be amended accordingly.
8
Should an agreement not be achieved on the delineation
of an ANSI boundary, this matter will be determined by
the Ontario Municipal Board."
Item #2 was further amended to add Condition #17 to read as
follows:
"17.
That the owner agree to pay total cost of the
improvement of the level crossing at Woodview Avenue."
Item #4 was amended to add the phrase "or cross examine" after
the phrase "be directed to call."".
CARRIED
8
The following items
above resolution:
were
considered
in
conjunction with
the
Resolution #143/92
Moved by Councillor Van Kempen
Seconded by Councillor Higdon
That Item #2 of the Planning Committee Report be amended to add
Condition #16 which reads as follows:
That Planning staff meet with Bramalea and the Ministry of
Natural Resources in an attempt to reach an agreement on the
delineation of an ANSI within Block 271 of the Town Recommended
Plan. Should an agreement be reached between Bramalea Limited,
the Town and the Ministry of Natural Resources that a westerly
shift in the ANSI boundary is appropriate, then modifications to
the plan may occur respecting the westerly extension of lotting
along Streets "C", "D", and "E". Such lotting expansion shall
not increase the total unit yield of the plan beyond 304 units
in the absence of a school on site or 272 units if a school is
located on site. Further, Town Council's conditions of approval
shall be considered to be amended accordingly.
8
Should an agreement not be achieved on the delineation of an
ANSI boundary, this matter will be determined by the Ontario
Municipal Board."
CARRIED
22/92
141
Recorded Vote:
No:
Councillors Higdon, Van Kempen,
Arthurs
Brenner, Johnson and Pistritto
Wellman
and
Mayor
Yes:
Resolution #144/92
8
Moved by Councillor Pistritto
Seconded by Councillor Johnson
That the Town Solicitor request a deferral of draft plan of
subdivision 18T-91019 at the ontario Municipal Board.
LOST
Recorded Vote:
Yes:
No:
Councillors Brenner, Johnson and Pistritto
Councillors Higdon, Van Kempen, Wellman
Arthurs
and
Mayor
Resolution #145/92
Moved by Councillor Brenner
Seconded by Councillor Pistritto
That the above resolution be tabled.
CARRIED
Recorded Vote:
8
No:
Councillors Brenner, Higdon,
Kempen and Mayor Arthurs
Councillor Wellman
Johnson,
Pistritto,
Van
Yes:
Resolution #146/92
Moved by Councillor Higdon
Seconded by Councillor Van Kempen
That the above resolution be lifted from the table.
CARRIED
Recorded Vote:
Yes:
Councillors Higdon, Van Kempen, Wellman
Arthurs
Councillors Brenner, Johnson and Pistritto
and
Mayor
No:
Resolution #147/92
8
Moved by Councillor Brenner
Seconded by Councillor Johnson
That a condition be added to Item #2 of the Planning Committee
Report that the applicant satisfy Section 2.3.1.4 of the new
Durham Official Plan regarding a full environmental impact study.
LOST
22/92
142
8
Recorded Vote:
Yes: Councillors Brenner, Johnson and Pistritto
No: Councillors Higdon, Van Kempen, Wellman and Mayor
Arthurs
Recorded Vote on Item #2 as amended:
Yes: Councillors Higdon, Van Kempen, Wellman and Mayor
Arthurs
No: Councillors Brenner, Johnson and Pistritto
Recorded Vote on Item #3:
Yes: Councillors Higdon, Van Kempen, Wellman and Mayor
Arthurs
No: Councillors Brenner, Johnson and Pistritto
Resolution #148/92
Moved by Councillor Wellman
Seconded by Councillor Higdon
1.
Official Plan Amendment Application 92-7/P
That Town Initiated Official Plan Amendment
Application 92-7/P, for lands within the Altona Forest
Area of the Highbush Community, being Part of Lots 31
and 32, Concession 1, in the Town of pickering, be
APPROVED IN PRINCIPLE, as set out in Appendix No. I to
Town Planning Report No. 16/90.
8
2.
Town Initiated Development Plan Amendment
That Town Council authorize Planning staff to prepare
appropriate amendments to the Development Plan for the
Highbush Community, generally as described in Appendix
No. II to Town Planning Report No. 16/90.
3.
Special policv Area Road Pattern
That Town Council request Planning staff to meet with
landowners located within the Special Policy Area of
the Altona Forest Area, to discuss alternative road
patterns generally as discussed in Town Planning
Report No. 16/90; and following such discussion, to
report back to Council on a recommended road pattern.
4.
Amendment Number 79 to the Pickerinq District Plan
That the draft by-law to adopt Amendment Number 79 to
the Pickering District Plan, as set out in Attachment
#1 to the Planning Director's Memorandum dated
September 15, 1992, be forwarded to council for
enactment and subsequently, that this Amendment be
forwarded to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs for
approval.
8
CARRIED
Recorded Vote:
No:
Councillors Higdon, Johnson, Pistritto,
Mayor Arthurs
Councillors Brenner and Van Kempen
Wellman
and
Yes:
22/92
143
Resolution #149/92
Moved by Councillor Higdon
Seconded by Councillor Van Kempen
Whereas the Frenchman's Bay Festival was held for the first time
this year to raise funds for the purchase of environmentally
sensitive lands adjacent to the Bay; and
8
Whereas this Festival should be held annually as a way of
educating the ratepayers of the importance of Frenchman's Bay to
the Town of Pickering; and
Whereas in order to maintain the success and viability of the
Festival in future years, the planning and co-ordination of this
Festival should be carried out by the staff of the Town of
Pickering who will provide the on-going professional expertise
needed to make this Festival an annual success;
Now Therefore the Council of the Corporation of the Town of
Pickering hereby directs that the Frenchman's Bay Festival shall
be an annual event to be carried out under the auspices of the
Town of Pickering; and
That this Festival shall be co-ordinated by the staff of the
Department of Community Services and Facilities.
Referred to 1993 budqet with the recommendation to qet reports
from the Director of Communitv Services and Facilities and
T.A.D.R.A. throuqh the Manaqer of Economic Developments
8
Resolution #150/92
Moved by Councillor Pistritto
Seconded by Councillor Johnson
That the Town Clerk be directed to prepare a by-law to lower the
speed limit on Golf Club Road to 40 milometres per hour.
CARRIED
Resolution #151/92
Moved by Councillor Higdon
Seconded by Councillor Pistritto
Whereas the Government of the Province of Ontario will be
introducing legislation to allow gambling casinos in Ontario; and
Whereas casinos tend to destroy the moral fabric of a community
and provide a negative temptation for those who have the least
amount of money; and
8
Whereas the intent of the Government of the Province of Ontario
in allowing casinos is to provide additional tax revenue;
22/92
144
Resolution #151/92 - continued
Now Therefore the Council of the Corporation of the Town of
Pickering hereby states its opposition to legalizing gambling
casinos in the Province of ontario;
e
and that copies of this resolution be forwarded to Premier Bob
Rae; Lynn McLeod, Leader of the Opposition; Mike Harris, Leader
of the Progressive Conservative Party; Jim Wiseman, MPP for the
Association of Municipalities of Ontario for its endorsation.
TABLED
Resolution #152/92
Moved by Councillor Pistritto
Seconded by Councillor Johnson
WHEREAS The Council of the Corporation of the Town of Pickering
passed Resolution '120/92 on August 4, 1992 to provide for the
circulation of draft By-law 4074/92 to designate a portion of
the hamlet of Whitevale as a Heritage Conservation District; and
WHEREAS this Resolution provided for the establishment of a
citizens' committee to review the Hamlet of Whitevale Heritage
Conservation District Plan and submit comments on it the Town
Clerk on or before September 18, 1992; and
8
WHEREAS this citizens' committee has requested an extension of
this deadline in order to satisfactorily review the District
Plan and the Guidelines, make recommendations and submit the
findings;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of . the Town of
Pickering hereby amends Resolution '120/92 as follows:
1.
In Sections 1 and 3, the deadline to submit comments
on draft By-law 4074/92 shall be changed from October
16, 1992 to December 18, 1992;
2.
In Section 2, the deadline for the citizens' committee
to report its findings to the Town Clerk shall be
changed from September 18, 1992 to November 20, 1992;
and
3.
In Section 4, the date of the
Meeting at which By-law 4074/92
the citizens' committee and the
considered shall be changed from
January 11, 1993.
Executive Committee
and the comments of
landowners shall be
November 9, 1992 to
CARRIED
LV}
BY-LAWS
8
Councillor Johnson, seconded by Councillor Higdon,
leave to introduce by-laws of the Town of Pickering:
moved
for
Bv-law Number 4079/92
Being a by-law to adopt Amendment Number 79 to the District Plan
in the Town of Pickering (OPA 92-7/P).
22/92
145
IV)
BY-LAWS - continued
By-law Number 4080/92
e
Being a by-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 3036, as
amended, to implement the Official Plan of the Town of Pickering
District Planning Area, Region of Durham, in Part of Block 56,
Plan 40M-1480, in the Town of Pickering. (A 18/92)
By-law Number 4081/92
Being a by-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 3036, as
amended, to implement the Official Plan of the Town of Pickering
District Planning Area, Region of Durham, in Part of Lot 19,
Concession 1, Town of Pickering (Part 3, Plan 40R-8663 and Part
1, Plan 40R-10048) OPA 90-100/P, A 32/90)
By-law Number 4082/92
Being a by-law to authorize the execution of a Subdivision
Agreement and related documentation respecting the development
of Part Lot 10, Plan 175, Pickering and to repeal By-law 3773/91
(parkhillYiew Estates Limited; 18T-89024).
By-law Number 4083/92
Being a by-law to authorize the execution
Discharge of the Subdivision Agreement, and
respecting that part of Lot 28, Concession
comprised of Plan M-1206, Pickering.
of a Release and
amendment thereto,
1, Pickering, now
By-law Number 4084/92
8
Being a by-law to authorize the execution of a permission to
Enter and Construct Agreement with Her Majesty the Queen in
right of Ontario, as represented by the Minister of Government
Services, respecting the reconstruction of Whites Road between
Finch Avenue and Taunton Road.
By-law Number 4085/92
Being a by-law to authorize the execution of a Release of
Indemnification Agreement respecting those parts of Lot 30,
Concession 1, Pickering, designated as Part Part 4, Plan 82,
Miscellaneous and Part 59, Plan 40R-4433 (Ross Michael Peters
and Brenda Carol Peters)
By-law Number 4087/92
Being a by-law to restrict the weight of vehicles passing over
certain bridges within the Town of Pickering.
By-law Number 4088/92
Being a by-law to amend By-law 2632/88 to provide for
at: a) the intersection of Maple Gate, Timber
Trailwood Court, b) Denmar Road and Jaywin Circle, c)
Square.
stop signs
Court and
Brookshire
8
By-law Number 4089/92
Being a by-law to amend By-law 2366/87 designating Falconcrest
Driye and Fawndale Road as through highways.
22/92
146
Recorded Vote on By-law Number 4079/92:
Yes:
Councillors Higdon, Johnson, Pistritto,
Mayor Arthurs
Councillors Brenner and Van Kempen
Wellman
and
No:
8
THIRD READING
Councillor Johnson, seconded by Councillor Higdon, moved that
the report of the Committee of the Whole on By-law Numbers
4079/92, 4080/92, 4081/92, 4082/92, 4083/92, 4084/92, 4085/92,
4087/92, 4088/92 and 4089/92 be adopted and the said by-laws be
now read a third time and PASSED and that the Mayor and Clerk
sign the same and the seal of the Corporation be affixed thereto.
CARRIED
Recorded Vote:
Yes:
Councillors Higdon, Johnson, Pistritto,
Mayor Arthurs
Councillors Brenner and Van Kempen
Wellman
and
No:
IVI)
OTHER BUSINESS
1.
Prior to the regular meeting, Council endorsed the
Ambassador Program and authorized it to be announced
at the Economic Banquet.
8
lVII)
CONFIRMATION BY-LAW
By-law Number 4090/92
Councillor Van Kempen, seconded by Councillor Johnson moved for
leave to introduce a By-law of the Town of Pickering to confirm
those proceedings of the Council of the Corporation of the Town
of Pickering at its meeting held on the 21st day of September,
1992 and that the same be now finally passed and that the Mayor
and Clerk sign the same and that the Seal of the Corporation be
thereto affixed.
CARRIED
IVIII)
ADJOURNMENT .
The Meeting adjourned at 1:25 a.m.
8
Dated
October 5th 1992
44~~
Mayor : ~ -
///
Á-~ ,--.
,
Clerk