Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAugust 26, 2015Committee of Adjustment Agenda Meeting Number: 12 Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 Citq "~ (I) Adoption of Agenda (II) Adoption of Minutes from August 5, 2015 (Ill) Reports 1. PICA 90115 K. Bryan 661 Pleasant Street 2. PICA 92115 E. Stone 5436 Brock Road 3. PICA 93115 S. & S. Uniya 1555 Avonmore Square 4. PICA 94115 & PICA 95115 E. & T. Mcintyre 1819 Spruce Hill Road 5. PICA 96115 B. & L. VVoodbine 305 Toynevale Road 6. PICA 97115 Com 53 Ltd. 1080 Brock Road, Unit 17 (IV) Adjournment Committee of Adjustment Agenda VVednesday,August26,2015 7:00pm Main Committee Room Page Number 1-8. 9-19 20-26 27-30 31-36 37-44 45-49 Accessible •--For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: PICKE~G Lesley Dunne T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024 TTY 905.420.1739 Email ldunne@pickering.ca Pending Adoption Present: Tom Copeland-Vice-Chair David Johnson -Chair Eric Newton Denise Rundle Sean Wiley Also Present: Amy Emm, Planner II Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Absent: Melissa Markham, Secretary-Treasurer (I) Adoption of Agenda Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes VVednesday,August5,2015 7:00pm Main Committee Room That the agenda for the Wednesday, August 5, 2015 meeting be adopted. (II) Adoption of Minutes Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland Carried Unanimously That the minutes of the 1Oth meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, July 15, 2015 be adopted. Carried Unanimously Page 1 of 8 1 2 Committee of Adjustment (Ill) Reports 1. PICA 86115 A. & J. Greenall 716 Leaside Street Meeting Minutes VVednesday,August5,2015 7:00pm Main Committee Room· The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended, to permit a partially covered porch to project a maximum of 1.0 metre into the required front yard, whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps, or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct an addition to an existing covered porch in the front yard. Planner II outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no concerns. Written comments were also received from the City's Building Services expressing no objections with the application and a detailed design will be considered during the building permit process. Anne & Jeff Greenall, owners, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 86115 by A. & J. Greenall, be Approved on the grounds that the partially covered porch to project a maximum of 1.0 metre into the required front yard is minor in-nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance applies only to the partially covered porch in the front yard as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by August 4, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously Page 2 of 8 2. PICA 87115 C. & M. Stanois 1995 Glendale Drive Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes V\fednesday, August 5, 2015 7:00pm Main Committee Room The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a ' minimum front yard setback of 5.5 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct a one-storey addition in the front yard. Planner II outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no concerns. George Stavros, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 87115 by C. & M. Stanois, be Approved on the grounds that the minimum front yard setback of 5.5 metres to a one-storey addition in the front yard is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance applies only to a maximum 9.0 square metre addition in the front yard, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by August 4, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. · Carried Unanimously Page 3 of 8 3 4 ·Committee of Adjustment 3. PICA 88/15 S. Mosher 361 Chickadee Court-Unit 2 Meeting Minutes VVednesday,August5,2015 7:00pm Main Committee Room The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 4645/95: • to permit minimum side yard widths of 0.6 of a metre; whereas the by-law requires that a minimum 1.2 metre interior side yard width shall be provided adjacent to the extension of that wall on the lot upon which that dwelling is located if an abutting interior side yard is not provided on the other lot • to permit a second-storey uncovered balcony and associated steps to project a maximum of 3.4 metres into the required rear yard; whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to construct a second-storey uncovered balcony and associated steps in the rear yard. Planner II outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no concerns. Written comments were also received from the City's Building Services expressing no objections with the application and a detailed design will be considered during the building permit process. Sharon Mosher, owner, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In response to questions from Committee Members, Sharon Mosher stated that the proposed second-storey deck will replace the existing juliet balcony. Sharon Mosher stated that a full sliding door currently exists, and that this application is the same as the neighbour, who obtained a minor variance earlier this year. Sharon Mosher also stated there will be no problems maintaining the second-storey balcony. Page 4 of 8 Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, August 5, 2015 7:00pm Main Committee Room That application PICA 88115 by S. Mosher, be Approved on the grounds that the minimum side yard widths of 0.6 of a metre and a maximum projection of 3.4 metres into the required rear yard for a second-storey uncovered balcony and associated steps are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed second-storey uncovered balcony and associated steps, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by August 4, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. · Carried Unanimously 4. PICA 89115 E. & R. Gosling 1290 Old Orchard Avenue-Unit 12 The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 6375104 and By-law 7201112 to permit an uncovered platform (deck and stairs) to project 0.8 of a metre outside the building envelope; whereas the by-law requires all buildings and structures to be located entirely within a building envelope having a minimum setback of 7.5 metres from the north lot line. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to permit an uncovered platform and stairs in the rear yard. Planner II outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no concerns. Charles Dow, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Page 5 of 8 5 6 Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Eric Newton Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday,'August 5, 2015 7:00pm Main Committee Room That application PICA 89115 by E. & R. Gosling, be Approved on the grounds that the uncovered platform and stairs to project 0.8 of a metre outside the building envelope is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance applies only to the proposed uncovered platform with a maximum size of 4.3 square metres and associated stairs, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by August 4, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. 5. PICA 91115 SSTI Granite Pickering, LLC 600 Granite Court Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 789178: • to permit a minimum of 64 parking spaces; whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 228 parking spaces • to permit front yard parking to be limited to 36 percent of the total required parking area; whereas the by-law limits front yard parking to 20 percent of the total required parking area • to permit a sales outlet accessory to a self-storage facility use, not exceeding 50 square metres; whereas the by-law does not permit a sales outlet accessory to a warehouse use The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain site plan approval for an addition to an existing self-storage facility. Planner II outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no concerns. Page 6 of 8 Committee of Adjustm·ent Meeting Minutes ·vvednesday,August5,2015 7:00pm Main Committee Room Evan Perlman, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In response to questions from Committee Members, Evan Perlman stated traffic generated at self-storage facilities are extremely low, the addition will be at the rear of the property, no further additions to the building are planned at this time, and that the accessory sales outlet is an existing condition, which is only used for the rental of the storage lockers and selling of packing supplies. Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 91/15 by SSTI Granite Pickering LLC, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances to permit a minimum of 64 parking spaces, to permit front yard parking to be limited to 36 percent of the total required parking area and to permit a sales outlet accessory to a self-storage facility use, not exceeding 50 square metres, are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in ~eeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: . 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed addition to a self-storage facility, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That only one sales outlet accessory to a self-storage facility is permitted within the building. 3. That the previous Minor Variance application (PICA 04/14), approved by the Committee of Adjustment on February 5, 2014, affecting the subject property, be repealed. 4. That the applicant obtains Site Plan Approval for the proposed addition by February 5, 2016, or this decision shall become mill and void. Carried Unanimously Page 7 of 8 7 8 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, August 5, 2015 7:00pm Main Committee Room (IV) Adjournment Date Chair Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Denise Rundle That the 11th meeting of the 2015 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 7:27 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday,August26, 2015. Carried Unanimously Assistant Secretary-Treasurer ' Page 8 of 8 From: Subject: Application Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 90115 Meeting Date: August 26, 2015 Principal Planner-Development Review Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 90115 K. Bryan 661 Pleasant Street The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended: • to recognize an existing lot frontage of 11.7 metres, whereas the by-law permits a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres • to recognize an existing lot area of 358 square metres, whereas the by-law permits a minimum lot area of 460 square metres • to permit a minimum front yard depth of 6.0 metres to the lot line facing Pleasant Street, whereas the by-law permits a minimum front yard depth of 7.5 metres • to permit a minimum front yard depth of 2.5 metres to the lot line facing Ann land Street, whereas the by-law permits a minimum front yard depth of 7.5 metres • to permit a covered platform (porch), not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.0 metre into the required front yard facing Annland Street, whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms, not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard • to permit a minimum north side yard width of 1.2 metres, whereas the by-law permits a minimum north side yard width of 1.5 metres • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct a three-storey detached dwelling on an existing non-conforming lot. 9 10 Report PICA 90/15 August26,2015 Page 2 Recommendation The City Development Department considers an existing lot frontage of 11.7 metres, an existing lot area of 358 square metres, a minimum front yard depth of 6.0 metres to the lot line facing Pleasant Street, a minimum front yard depth of 2.5 metres to the lot line facing Ann land Street, a covered platform (porch), not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade, to project a maximum of 1.0 metre into the required front yard facing Ann land Street, a minimum north side yard width of 1.2 metres, and a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent, to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed va~iance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance applies only to the existing lot and proposed three-storey detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by August 25, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject lands as "Urban Residential -Low Density Areas" within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood. The subject property is currently zoned "R4"-Third Residential Zone within Zoning By-law 2511, as amended. Appropriateness of the Application Minimum Lot Area and Frontage • the lot was created prior to the passing of the Zoning By-law • the configuration and size of the existing lot is appropriate and compatible with the surrounding residential area • this variance will bring the existing legal non-complying lot into compliance with the Zoning By-law Report PICA 90/15 August26,2015 11 Page 3 Front Yard Depth Variances • the intent of a minimum front yard depth is to ensure that an adequate landscaped area, parking area and separation distance is provided between the dwelling and the front lot line • the Zoning By-law states that where a main building is erected upon a corner lot with its main front entrance facing the flank of such lot, such main building is deemed to have two front yards; therefore, a minimum front yard depth of 7.5 metres is required along both Pleasant Street and Annland Street. • the applicant is requesting a minimum front yard depth of 6.0 metres to the lot line facing Pleasant Street, and a minimum front yard depth of 2.5 metres to the lot line facing Annland Street • the proposed front yard depth of 6.0 metres to Pleasant Street will provide a sufficient buffer space between the dwelling and Pleasant Street and ensure that an adequate driveway entrance supporting a parking area between the garage and street can be maintained • the proposed front yard depth of 2.5 metres to the lot line facing Ann land Street is in keeping with the front yard depths of other properties along Ann land Street, which range from approximately 2.5 metres to 4.5 metres • the proposed front yard depths will provide an adequate landscaped area, parking area and separation distance between the dwelling and the front lot lines • the proposed front yard depths are compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood Uncovered Platforms Projecting into the required Front Yard Variance • the intent of this provision is to provide the opportunity for any stairs and/or a landing platform to encroach into the front yard when needed, to ensure an· adequate buffer space between buildings and street activity is provided, and to ensure an adequate landscaped area within the front yard is. also provided • the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a ~aximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard • the applicant is proposing a covered porch not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.0 metre into the requested 2.5 metre front yard depth to the lot line facing Annland Street • an adequate buffer space between the proposed covered porch and street activity along Ann land Street will be maintained • the proposed covered porch will be unenclosed and will provide an adequate landscaped area between the proposed dwelling and street activity • the proposed covered porch will not obstruct the streetview of abutting property owners 12 Report PICA 90115 North Side Yard Width Variances August26,2015 Page4 • the intent of a minimum side yard width is to provide an appropriate separation between structures on abutting properties in order to maintain a pedestrian access, to accommodate grading, drainage and residential services such as air conditioning units and utility meters and to maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood • the applicant has requested a variance to reduce the.minimum north side yard width from 1.5 metres to 1.2 metres • the existing dwelling on the subject property has a north side yard width of 0.6 of a metre, which was recognized by the Committee of Adjustment through minor variance application PICA 09112 • the applicant is proposing a 3 storey dwelling, which will have a greater impact on the adjacent property owner than the existing 1 storey detached dwelling, therefore the applicant is proposing to increase the existing north side yard width to 1.2 metres • the adjacent dwelling to the north is setback an additional 3.4 metres from the property line abutting the subject lands, which will maintain an appropriate separation between the dwellings • the proposed side yard setbacks will maintain the character of the existing residential community Maximum Lot Coverage Variances • the intent of the maximum lot coverage provision is to ensure that the size, scale and massing of a dwelling, and bther accessory buildings are appropriate for the lot size and to ensure an adequate amount of outdoor amenity area remains uncovered by buildings on a lot • the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent • the applicant has requested a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent • the increase in lot coverage from 33 percent to 38 percent will not change the character of these properties or the area • staff are of the opinion that the proposed development will maintain a sufficient amount of outdoor amenity area that will remain uncovered and unobstructed on the lot and will provide for the appropriate development of the land as the size, scale and massing of the proposed dwelling will be in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighbourhood Staff are of the opinion that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintain the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Report PICA 90/15 Input From Other Sources Building Services Engineering & Public Works Date of report: August 20, 2015 Comments prepared by: Amy Emm, MCIP, RPP Planner II AE:MM:df August26,2015 13 Page 5 • the owner will need to demonstrate compliance with the Ontario Building Code spatial separation requirements through calculations and drawing submission at the time of building permit application • no concerns Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review J:\Documents\Development\D-3700 Committee of Adjustment (PCA Appli~tions)\2015\PCA 90-15 Kirk Bryan\Report\PCA 90_15.doc Enclosures 14 FRENCHMAN's BAY I I ~ ~ City Development Department Location Map FILE No: P/CA 90/15 APPLICANT: K. Bryan OMMERCE STREET PARK ~+---le-w 1--t----lw 1--t-----tcr: 1--+----ttn s PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 65 Blk D Pt Lot 1 (661 Pleasant Street) Octo Sources: Tercnet Enterpl'"lsetJ Inc. and Ita suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not a plan of survey. 2013 MPAC and its su pliers. All rl hta Reserved. Not a plan of Surve . DATE: June 16, 2015 SCALE 1 :5,000 PN-3 To re c o g n i z e an ex i s t i n g lo t fr o n t a g e of 11 . 7 me t r e s To pe r m i t a mi n i m u m fr o n t ya r d de p t h of 6. 0 me t r e s to th e lo t li n e fa c i n g Pl e a s a n t St r e e t To pe r m i t a mi n i m u m no r t h si d e ya r d se t b a c k of 1. 2 me t r e s To pe r m i t a ma x i m u m lo t co v e r a g e of 38 pe r c e n t To recognize an existing lot area of 358 square metres 1-w w a: 1-U) 1 -z < ( U) < ( w __ J CL I 30 ~ .. 0 ~ 1. 2 m 7 i Dr i v e w a y E. t- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -t - - - . - r- - Pr o p o s e d 3- S t o r e y Dw e l l i n g ... - - ... - - 7.6m 6. 0 m ~ Po r c h L . . . - - - - - - - - - - - 1 _ _ _ __ , T · d I t" 30 ·2m · · · f t o pe r m 1 t a co v e r e p a 1o r m To pe r m 1 t a mm1mum ron (p o r c h ) , no t ex c e e d i n g 1. 0 me t r e in ya r d de p t h of 2.5 metres he i g h t ab o v e gr a d e to pr o j e c t a to th e lo t li n e facing ma x i m u m of 1. 0 me t r e in t o th e An n l a n d St r e e t re q u i r e d fr o n t ya r d fa c i n g An n la n d AN N LA N D ST R E E T St r e e t Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : PI C A 90 / 1 5 AP P L I C A N T : K. Br y a n PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : P i a n 65 Bl k D Pt Lo t 1 (6 6 1 Pl e a s a n t St r e e t ) --E 00 ...--...--1' Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PI C K E R I N G CIT Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . J DATE:August11,2~ ~ Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t ' ' ' ' ' ' ' \ ' I I ! I I I I ' / .·~r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~I l ~- - - - - 1 I I I I I I I I I I r- - - - - ~:: : : : -«-t J : \ : ~ : : ... =-- : - . ; ; ; : ; . L - - - t - - - - - 1 I r~ I I I I •I I I I I lr r · _ _ _ _ _ _j I -- - - - - , -- - - - - 1 -- - - - ~ -- - - - - , I I I I I I I I I I I I -. - - - - - 1 -- - - - ~ -- - - - - 1 I -- - - - - , -- - - - - 1 HFs: : : : ; J h r - - - - - - ~ d r . = = i l l ' --- - - ~ ~~ - - - - - , ' / ' ' .' I I I \ I ' \ I ' ' ' It / , I ! r~ I r.. J : - - - - I - - - - I -- - - : - - - - I - - - - I I - - - - I -- - - -- - - - ~ f: : : : : : i I I I j I I I t 1 r. . J I ! : I r- 1 I J I l r. . . J I I L - t - - - - - . . . J ~ : ~-t - - - - - ~ I I 1-~ - - - - - - 1 / / / / ' \\ # , I . ' ' ~ I <n ' / ' ' ' / ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' \, \ ' ' ' ' ' / ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' \ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' / ' ' / \ ' / l l ~-t - - - - - ~ I I r- - } - - - - - - , I I j I I :::: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : r : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ~ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ~ c : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : r : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : J SO U T H (S I D E ) EL E V A T I O N Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 90 / 1 5 AP P L I C A N T : K. Br y a n PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : Pl a n 65 Bl k D Pt Lo t 1 (6 6 1 Pl e a s a n t St r e e t ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VIE W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PI C K E R I N G CI T Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T ~ 1 DATE: August 11, 2015 1. . . . - - - I ~ ', ', / / / / i l L _ = - .... . . . . ·· ~ - ··~ ~- -; - __ _ _ J , .... . . , .. - ~ " ' -- ~ I HI - I ' I J __ _ _ -j- .. . . ,·~ - ' " " " .. ..., .... -- T l c = I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l ~-- - ~ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ~ = = ~ l l l // : : l c:: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ~ J ~ ~ = ~ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ~ : : : : j __ _ t: : : J Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t NO R T H (S I D E ) EL E V A T I O N Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 90 / 1 5 AP P L I C A N T : K. Br y a n PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : P i a n 65 Bl k D Pt Lo t 1 (6 6 1 Pl e a s a n t St r e e t ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CIT Y OF PIC K E R I N G CIT Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T 1 DATE: August 11, 201'5 Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t 1::: - - - L J __ _ _ _ J I I I I I I I ~ I I I >. I I I I : I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I c: : J : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : J EA S T (R E A R ) EL E V A T I O N Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 90 / 1 5 AP P L I C A N T : K. Br y a n PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : P i a n 65 Bl k D Pt Lo t 1 (6 6 1 Pl e a s a n t St r e e t ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CIT Y OF PI C K E R I N G CI T Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . ..... -w 1 DATE: August 11, 2015 Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t I Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 90 / 1 5 AP P L I C A N T : K. Br y a n --· - - I TI i f= " ' r _ - - - - - . - - - - .. r:- -. I ·-- - - ,. ---- -._ - ..~.- I . -· _ -1 l u u n 0 " - ~ -- c . : _ _ _ . - - · - '- - - ~ c . c . ~ = r j =J - = ~ : : ~ : = " - - ~ : = ~ I . - . - . - . - .. . . -.~. ~ ~ .. I I I • i1 ' 1 .·. .I I , ~ : ': 1. : ' ;! -- - - - . J~ ~ ~- 1 l - - - r rn j . I := J - j - ---~li l I ' ji l l " ~~ ] I ~ " I ur - ; - - - -- ~ ~ ~ r~---- " - ---~~ ! 1 1 .. ~ "" i f- - _ l _ l _ _ \ -- - .... . ' ' "",_ - : - ~ l . ~ - - FR O N T (W E S T ) EL E V A T I O N PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : Pl a n 65 Bl k D Pt Lo t 1 (6 6 1 Pl e a s a n t St r e e t ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VIE W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PI C K E R I N G CI T Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . DATE:August11, 201'5 20 From: Subject: Application Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 92115 Meeting Date: August 26, 2015 Principal Planner-Development Review Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 92115 E. Stone - 5436 Brock Road . The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640106, to permit a covered porch to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard, whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps and platforms to project no more than 1.5 metres into the required front yard .. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct a covered porch in the front yard. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a covered porch to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-Jaw, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions:· 1. That this variance applies only to the covered porch in the front yard as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by August 25, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject property as "Oak Ridges Moraine Rural Hamlets". The subject property is currently zoned "ORM-A & ORM-EP" -Oak Ridges Moraine Agricultural Zone and Oak Ridges Moraine Environmental Protection Zone, within Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640106. Report PICA 92/15 Appropriateness of the Application August 26, 2015 Page 2 Covered Platform Projecting into th~ required Front Yard Variance: • the intent of the uncovered steps and/or platforms provision is to provide the opportunity for any stairs· and/or a landing platform to encroach into the front yard when needed; to ensure an adequate buffer space between buildings and street activity is provided, and to ensure an adequate landscaped area within the front yard is also maintained • the by-law permits uncovered steps and/or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project no more than 1.5 metres into the required front yard • the applicant is requesting to permit a covered porch not exceeding 1.0 metres in height above grade to project no more than 1.5 metres into the required front yard • the applicant is proposing an addition to an existing detached dwelling in order to connect the dwelling to an existing detached garage • the existing dwelling and detached garage are setback approximately 12.0 metres from the front lot line, which is the minimum zoning by-law requirement • the proposed addition will have a minimum front yard setback of 12.0 metres • in order to accommodate the relocation of the covered main entrance to the new addition to the dwelling, the applicant is requesting a projection for a proposed covered porch into the required front yard • the projection of a covered porch into the required front y~rd will continue to provide a sufficient buffer space between the dwelling and Brock Road and maintain an adequate landscaped area • the requested varic:mce is minor in nature and maintains the intent of the Pickering Official Plan and Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources: Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Engineering & Public Works • no objection to the· application • the enclosed porch is located to the front of the dwelling, and is well removed from the wetlands to the rear and west side of the property • there are no natural features within proximity of the proposed porch • no comments 21 22 Report PICA 92/15 Date of report: August 20, 2015 Comments prepared by: w Deepak Bhatt, MCIP, RPP Planner II DB:MM:df Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP August 26, 2015 Page 3 Principal Planner-Development Review J:\Oocuments\Development\D-3700 Committee of Adjustmef!t (PCA Applications)\2015\PCA 92-15 E. Stone\Report\PCA 92-15.doc Enclosures UXBRIDGE PICK RING z 0 I-X 0 I -."'" I I t City Development Department Location Map FILE No: P/CA 92/15 APPLICANT: E. Stone PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:Con 9, Pt. Lot 17, 40R-15053, Part 2 5436 Brock Road DATE: Aug. 4, 2015 SCALE 1:5,000 23 City Development Department 1-0 _J t i Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 92/15 APPLICANT: E. Stone 84.5m To permit a covered porch project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front yard PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Con 9, Pt. Lot 17, 40R-15053, Part 2 AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING DATE: Aug. 6, 2015 City Development Department PROPOSED ADDITION PROPOSED COVERED PORCH Enlargement of Structure on Submitted Plan FILE No: PICA 92/15 APPLICANT: E. Stone PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Con 9, Pt. Lot 17, 40R-15053, Part 2 (5436 Brock Road) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Aug. 6, 2015 EXISTING DWELLING ~ROPOSED ADDITION-j-EXISTING GARAGE City Development Department FRONT (EAST) ELEVATION Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 92/15 APPLICANT: E. Stone PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Con 9, Pt. Lot 17, 40R-15053, Part 2 (5436 Brock Road) I I I .J FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Aug. 6, 2015 From: Subject: Application Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 93/15 Meeting Date: August 26, 2015 Principal Planner--: Development Review Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 93/15 S. & S. Uniya 1555 Avonmore Square The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 5891/01 and 5955/02, to permit uncovered steps and platform/deck not exceeding 1.8 metres in height to project a maximum of 3.7 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 4.4 metres in height to project a maximum of 2.5 metres into a required rear yard. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct a deck in the rear yard. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the uncovered steps and deck not exceeding 1.8 metres in height to project a maximum of 3.7 metres into the required . rear yard to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance applies only to the platform/deck in the rear yard, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by August 25, 2017 or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject property as "Mixed Use Areas- Downtown Core". The subject property is currently zoned ""S-SD-3"-Detached Dwellings and Semi-Detached Dwellings Zone within Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law . 5891/01 and 5955/02. 27 28 Report PICA 93/15 Appropriateness of the Application: August 26, 2015 Page 2 Uncovered Steps and Platforms Projecting into required Rear Yard Variance • the intent of permitting maximum projections into the required rear yard for any additions or decks is to ensure that any additions/structures can be appropriately maintained without having to encroach onto abutting properties, to minimize any adverse impact on adjacent neighbours such as privacy and to ensure that an adequate outdoor amenity area is provided within the rear yard • the by-law permits uncovered steps and decks, not exceeding 4.4 metres in height above grade, to project a maximum of 2.5 metres into the required rear yard • the applicant is requesting to permit uncovered steps and decks, not exceeding 1.8 metres in height above grade, to project a maximum of 3.7 metres into the required rear yard • the applicant is proposing to replace an existing deck projecting 2.4 metres into the required rear yard, with a larger deck projecting a maximum of 3.7 metres into the required rear yard • there will be minimal adverse impacts on adjacent neighbours due the height of the deck above grade, the minor increase in size from the existing deck, the setbacks from the side property lines and the fact that the subject property abuts the City of Pickering Recreation Complex parking lot to the rear • an adequate buffer space between the proposed deck and the rear lot line as well as from abutting property owners will be maintained • · the proposed deck will provide for additional outdoor amenity area and maintains an adequate soft landscapes area in the rear yard • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintains the intent of the Pickering Official Plan and Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works Date of report: August 20, 2015 Comments prepared by: V/ Deepak Bhatt, MCIP, RPP Planner II DB:MM:Id J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2015\PCA 93-15\Report\PCA 93·15 Report.doc Enclosures · • no comments Jl1l{ .~JJa~~ Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review GLENGROVE PUBLIC SCHOOL City Development Department Location Map FILE No: P/CA 93/15 SUBJECT PROPERTY PICKERING RECREATION COMPLEX APPLICANT: S. & S. Uniya er::: 0 0 er::: er::: 0 u DIANA, PRINCESS OF WALES PARK 0 er::: 0 >-::r PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 40M-2089 Pt Lot 12, 40R-21250, Part 2 {1555 Avonmore Square) DATE: Aug. 4, 2015 SCALE 1:5,000 PN·8 29 ,,.. AVONMORE SQUARE To permit an uncovered platform (deck) and steps, not exceeding 1.8 metres in height above grade, to project a maximum of 3. 7 metres into the required rear yard I E L() ("") ("") I Submitted Plan ~ . 7.6m l.L .~ EXISTING 2 STOREY DWELLING 7.6m FILE No: P/CA 93/15 APPLICANT: S. & S. Uniya E L() ("") . ("") I ~~ Pl( ~~ City Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 40M-2089 Pt Lot 12, 40R-21250, Part 2 (1555 Avonmore Square) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I DATE: Aug. 6, 2015 From: Subject: Applications Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Numbers: PICA 94115 & PICA 95115 Meeting Date: August 26, 2015 Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review Committee of Adjustment Applications PICA 94115 & PICA 95115 E.& T. Mcintyre 1819 Spruce Hill Road PICA 94115 (Part 1, 40R-28791) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended: • to permit a minimum lot frontage of 12.4 metres; whereas the by-law permits a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres • to permit a minimum side yard widths of 1.2 metres and 0.6 of a metre; whereas the by-law permits a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 40 percent; whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent PICA 95115 (Part 2, 40R-28791) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended: • to permit a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres and 0.6 of a metre; whereas the by-law permits a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 40 percent; whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent The applicant requests approval of these minor variance applications in order to permit the construction of a two-storey detached dwelling on the proposed severed and retained parcels related to a Region of Durham Land Division application LD 104115. Recommendation PICA 94115 (Part 1, 40R-28791) The City Development Department considers a minimum lot frontage of 12.4 metres, minimum side yard widths of 1.2 metres and 0.6 of a metre, and a maximum lot · coverage of 40 percent, to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances subject to the following conditions: 31 32 Report PICA 94115 & PICA 95115 August 26, 2015 Page 2 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed lot configuration for the proposed retained parcel (Part 1) as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain final clearance for Land Division Application LD 104115, or this decision shall become null and void. 3: That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction on the proposed retained parcel (Part 1) by August 25, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. Recommendation PICA 95/15 (Part 2, 40R-28791) The City Development Department considers a minimum side yard widths of 1.2 metres and 0.6 of a metre, and a maximum lot coverage of 40 percent, to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By.;.law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance applies only to the proposed lot configura~ion for the proposed severed parcel (Part 2) as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtains final clearance for Land Division Application LD 104115, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction on the proposed severed parcel (Part 2) by August 25, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law The Pickering Officia.l Plan designates the subject property as "Urban Residential Areas -Low Density" within the Dunbarton Neighborhood. The subject property is currently zoned "R4" -Fourth Density Residential Zone within Zoning By-law 3036, as amended. Report PICA 94115 & PICA 95115 Appropriateness of the Application Reduced Lot Frontage Variance (PICA 94115) August26,2015 Page 3 • the intent of the minimum lot frontage requirement is to ensure a usable lot size that is compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood • the Zoning By-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres • the applicant is requesting a minimum lot frontage of 12.4 metres for the proposed retained parcel • the proposed severed parcel, adjacent to existing residential development, has a proposed lot frontage of 18.0 metres which is compatible with the existing development to the north, and allows for an appropriate transition to the 12.4 metre frontage proposed for the retained parcel to the south • the lot frontages of the existing development to the north of the subject property range from 12.0 metres to 15.0 metres • the lands to the south and east of the subject property are owned by the applicant and are subject to Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2013-05 and Zoning By-law Amendment A 9113 .. • Zoning By-law 7378114 was passed in July 2015 for the lands within Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2013-05, which permits a minimum lot frontage of 12.0 metres • the proposed lot frontage of 12.4 metres is consistent with the lotting pattern proposed along the extension of Wingarden Crescent • the proposed lot frontage is consistent with the existing lot frontages within the immediate area and with the 12.0 metre minimum lot frontage requirement of the Dunbarton Guidelines • the requested variance to reduce the minimum required lot frontage will maintain an appropriate lot size and allow for the <;:onstruction of a detached dwelling that is compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood Side Yard Setback Variances • the intent of a minimum side yard setback is to provide an appropriate separation between structures on abutting properties in order to maintain a pedestrian access, to accommodate grading, drainage and residential services such as air conditioning units and utility meters, and to maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood • the Zoning By-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres • the owner has requested to reduce the minimum side yard widths to 1.2 metres and 0.6 metres • the lands to the south and east of the subject property are owned by the applicant and are subject to Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2013-05 and Zoning By-law Amendment A 9113 • Zoning By-law 7378/14 was passed in July 2015 for the lands within Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2013-05, which permits a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres on one side and 0.6 metres on the other side 33 34 Report PICA 94115 & PICA 95115 August 26, 2015 Page4 • the proposed side yard setbacks would maintain an adequate buffer space, provide an appropriate setback and separation from abutting properties with respect to privacy, views and openness • the proposed side yard setbacks will maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood Maximum Lot Coverage Variances • the intent of the maximum lot coverage provision is to ensure that the size, scale and massing of a dwelling, and accessory buildings, are appropriate for the lot size and to ensure an adequate amount of outdoor amenity area remains uncovered by buildings on a lot • the Zoning By-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent • the owner has requested a maximum lot coverage of 40 percent • the requested variances are appropriate for the development of the land as the size and massing of the proposed dwellings will be compatible with the existing character within the surrounding neighbourhood Staff are of the opinion that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintain the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Building Services Engineering & Public Works Date of report: August 20, 2015 Comments prepared by: Lalita Paray, MCIP, RPP Planner I LP:MM:Id • the owner will need to demonstrate compliance with the Ontario Building Code spatial separation requirements through calculations and drawing submission at the time of building permit application • a revised grading plan will be required to be submitted for approvalto the satisfaction of the City Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review J:\Documents\Development\0-3700\2015\PCA 94-15 & PCA 9S..15\Report\pca 94 & 95_15.doc Enclosures City Development Department Location Map Fl LE No: P /CA 94/15 & P /CA 95/15 APPLICANT: E. & T. Mcintyre PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 1041, RCP Pt Lot 56, 40R-5825, Part 2 (1819 Spruce Hill Road) DATE: Aug. 4, 2015 Octo Sources: Teronet Enterprise.B Inc. and Its suppliers. All rights Reserv.ed. Not a pion of survey. 2013 MPAC end its suppliers. All nghts Reserved. Not o pion of Survey. SCALE 1:5,000 PN-11 PC A 94 / 1 5 & PC A 95 / 1 5 To pe r m i t a ma x i m u m lo t co v e r a g e of 40 pe r c e n t 1' E -.:: : 1 " N ~ Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 94 / 1 5 & P/ C A 95 / 1 5 AP P L I C A N T : E & T Mc i n t y r e PR O P O S E D 2 ST O R E Y DW E L L I N G PR O P O S E D 2 ST O R E Y DW E L L I N G E co 0 ~ .,.. . , E N permit a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres and 0.6 of a PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : Pl a n 10 4 1 , RC P Pt Lo t 56 , 40 R - 5 8 2 5 , Pa r t 2 (1 8 1 9 Sp r u c e Hill Road) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PIC K E R I N G CI T Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . DATE: Aug. 6, 2015 c.,.:) Ol From: Subject: Application Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 96115 Meeting Date: August 26, 2015 Principal Planner-Development Review Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 96115 B. & L. Woodbine 305 T oynevale Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended: • to recognize an existing lot frontage of 15.2 metres, whereas the by-law permits a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres • to recognize an existing lot area of 460 square metres, whereas the by-law permits a minimum lot area of 550 square metres • to permit minimum side yard widths of 1.5 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling, whereas the by-law permits minimum side yard widths of 1.8 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 36 percent, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct a two-storey detached dwelling. Recommendation The City Development Department considers an existing lot frontage of 15.2 metres, an existing lot area of 460 square metres, minimum side yard widths of 1.5 metres, and a maximum lot coverage of 36 percent to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official P,lan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed two-storey detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by August 25, 2017, or this decision shall become null and void. 37 38 Report PICA 96115 Background August 26, 2015 Page 2 On April 30, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment approved Minor Variance Application PICA 22/14, to permit a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres, a minimum lot area of 460 square metres and minimum side yard widths of 1.5 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling. The approval for PICA 22114 only applied to the lot configuration and side yards as sited on the plans submitted at that time. The lot configuration has not been revised, and the Land Division Application (LD 39114) to create the subject property has been finalized. However, the applicant revised the siting and outline of the proposed dwelling and is requesting an additional variance for an increase in lot coverage, therefore the previous minor variance application no longer applies. · Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject lands as "Urban Residential -Low Density Areas" within the Rosebank Neighbourhood. · The subject property is currently zoned "R3"-Third Residential Zone within Zoning By-law 2511 , as amended. Appropriateness of the Application Existing Lot Frontage and Lot Area Variances • the intent of the minimum lot frontage and area requirement is to ensure a usable lot size that is compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood • the existing Zoning By-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres and a minimum lot area of 550 square metres • the applicant is requesting a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres and a minimum lot area of 460 square metres • the existing lot frontage and lot area for the subject property were created through Land Division Application LD 39114 and previously approved by the Committee of Adjustment through PICA 22114 • properties to the east of the subject property, along Toynevale Road, currently permit a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres which is consistent with the lot frontage requirements of the Rosebank Neighbourhood Developm~nt Guidelines • a lot frontage of 15.2 metres and lot area of 460 square metres is compatible with the established lotting pattern along Toyn.evale Road • the existing lot has sufficient depth and frontage to allow for the construction of a detached dwelling that is in keeping with the existing dwellings along T oynevale Road Report PICA 96/15 Side Yard Setback Variances August 26, 2015 Page 3 • the intent of a minimum side yard setback is to provide an appropriate separation between structures on abutting properties in order to maintain a pedestrian access, and to accommodate grading, drainage and residential services such as air conditioning units and utility meters, and to maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood • the Zoning By-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.8 metres • the applicant has requested to reduce the minimum side yard widths from 1.8 metres to 1.5 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling • the proposed side yard setbacks would maintain an adequate buffer space, provide an appropriate setback and separation from abutting properties with respect to privacy, views and openness • the proposed side yard setbacks will maintain the character of the surrounding neighbourhood Maximum Lot CoveragerVariance · • the intent of the maximum lot coverage provision is to ensure that the size, scale and massing of a dwelling, and accessory buildings, are appropriate for the lot size and to ensure an adequate amount of outdoor amenity area remains uncovered by buildings on a lot • the Zoning By-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent • the applicant has requested a maximum lot coverage of 36 percent • the increase in lot coverage from 33 percent to 36 percent will not change the character of the surrounding neighbourhood • the requested variance is appropriate for the development of the land as the size and massing of the proposed dwelling will be compatible with the existing · character within the surrounding neighbourhood Staff are of the opinion that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and maintain the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works • no comments or concerns with the application 39 40 Report PICA 96/15 Date of report: August 20, 2015 Comments prepared by: Amy Emm, MCIP, RPP Planner II AE:MM:df August26,2015 Page4 /1!Vl· m/~JkrV'- Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review J:\Oocuments\Development\D-3700 Committee of Adjustment (PCA Applications)\2015\PCA 96-15 B. & L. Woodblne\Report\PCA 96_15.doc Enclosures --------------------------------------------------- -ROUGE City Development Department Location Map Fl LE No: P /CA 96/15 . APPLICANT: B. & L. Woodbine · PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 350, Pt Lot 28, 40R-28820 Part 2 (305 Toynevale Road) ' DATE: Aug. 4, 2015 Deto Sources: Ter-onet Enterpriaes Inc:. and its suppliers. ·All rights Reserved. Not a pion of survey. 2013 MPAC and its suppliers. All ri hts Reserved. Not o pion of Surve . SCALE 1 :5,000 PN-1 41 TOYNEVALE AVENUE --*---~---1-5.~2'~ -~~; ~; 1 I~ To permit a minimum lot · frontage of 15.2 metres ~~~~~~~~v~~~ t-1 .--r " I ITo permit a maximum lot I coverage of.36% ~ ~ .---~ To permit a minimum lot 1---area of 460 square metres I I I l 1.5m-+ ,~ ~ ~ """ to permit minimum side : 1 ""' yard widths of 1.~ metres L--------"'""t---where a garage 1s erected PROPOSED NEW 2 STOREY as part of a detached 1 . "~~---r dwelling ~ . (') 1.5m--. ·~ Citq,~ ~ City Development Department I E I ' - t .,1 5.7<10 1 rrm i ~ 2.4m ., oO I I ---· 2-. ~- Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 96/15 APPLICANT: B. & L. Woodbine PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 350, Pt Lot 28, 40R-28820 Part 2 (305 Toynevale Avenue) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CI1Y OF PICKERING CI1Y DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I DATE: Aug. 6, 2015 City Development Department I I ! ! DDDDDD DDDDDD DDDDDD DDDDDD DDDDDD I I ~ ~ ! ! FRONT (NORTH) ELEVATION REAR (SOUTH) ELEVATION Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 96/15 APPLICANT: B. & L. Woodbine I I I : PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 350, Pt Lot 28, 40R-28820 Part 2 (305 Toynevale Avenue) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Aug. 61 2015 .: \ ' .... ~ :·-· ..... . ~. :~ ;., .. . -:~ ;:.:: -~. ~=;n;=::::;l'.:'::::' ... ~:·-: :. ·'·:·:~. ·.·.··:·'f'. City Development Department I I I I ! ! I I I I I ! ': : I I SIDE (EAST) ELEVATION Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 96/15 APPLICANT: B. & L. Woodbine PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Plan 350, Pt Lot 28, 40R-28820 Part 2 (305 Toynevale Avenue) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. DATE: Aug. 6, 2015 From: Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 97115 Meeting Date: August 26, 2015 Principal Planner-Development Review Subject: Application Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 97115 Com 53 Ltd. 1080 Brock Road -Unit 17 The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended, to permit an indoor Vehicle Sales Shop having a maximum gross floor area of 45 square metres accessory to a Vehicle Repair Shop; whereas the by-law does not permit a Vehicle Sales Shop. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to permit an indoor Vehicle Sales Shop accessory to an existing Vehicle Repair Shop (Street Salon Motorsports) on the subject lands. Recommendation The City Development Department considers an indoor Vehicle Sales Shop having a maximum gross floor area of 45 square metres accessory to an existing Vehicle Repair Shop, to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to an indoor Vehicle Sales Shop, having a maximum gross floor area of 45 square metres, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the Vehicle Sales Shop be limited to display no more than three motor vehicles. 3. That the indoor Vehicle Sales Shop shall only be permitted accessory to an existing Vehicle Repair Shop. 4. That no outdoor storage of vehicles is permitted. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law The Pickering Official Plan des.ignates the subject lands "Employment Areas -Mixed Use Employment Area", which permits a range of uses including automotive and vehicle sales and repair. The subject property is currently zoned "M1"-Storage and Light Manufacturing Zone within Zoning By-law 2511, as amended. 45 46 Report PICA 97/15 · Appropriateness of the Application Accessory Indoor Vehicle Sales Shop Variance August26,2015 Page2 • the Zoning By-law does not permit retail stores and retail operations on the subject lands • the applicant is requesting to permit vehicle sales accessory to an existing vehicle repair shop • the applicant is proposing to display vehicles for sale in a designated area, not exceeding 45 square metres, within an existing vehicle repair shop currently existing on the subject property • the existing vehicle repair shop (Street Salon Motorsports-Unit 17) is an independently owned business which has been in operation since 2004 at this location • no outdoor display or storage of vehicles will be permitted • the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding properties as the lands to the north of the subject lands were rezoned in 2000 to permit vehicle sales, among other retail uses · • the requested variance does not appear to create an adverse effect on the abutting lands and surrounding community with respect to visual impact, noise, traffic, and parking · • the requested variance to allow indoor Vehicle Sales Shop having a maximum gross floor area of 45 square metres, accessory to an existing vehicle repair shop is minor in nature, appropriate for the development of the land the and maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works Date of report: August 20, 2015 Comments prepared by: La~MCIPRPP Planner I LP:MM:df J:\Documents\Development\0·3700\2015\PCA 97-15\Report\PCA 97 _15.doc Enclosures • no comments or concerns with the application Melissa Markham, MCJP, RPP Principal Planner-Development Review WALES PARK 0 0::: 0 >-::r::: 0::: 0 0 0::: 0::: 0 u 0 0::: 0 >-::r::: FIREHALL No. 5 BAYLY City Development Department 47 0 <( 0 w 0:: :::J z w ~ PLUMMER STREET QUARTZ .ST. ~ u 0 0:: ~ Ill _j >- <( 0 U1 ~ STREET BAYLY Location Map FILE No: PICA 97/15 APPLICANT: Com 53 Ltd. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:Con 1 Pt Lot 19, 40R-2960, Part 1 (1080 Brock Road} DATE: Aug. 4, 2015 Daf~,.:~~~"tc:~~erpriaes Inc. and Its suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not a plan of survey. SCALE 1 :5,QQQ PN-4 2013 MPAC and Ita suppliers. All r-1 hts Reserved. Not a lon of Surve . p, . i Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t ~.A . L . . I L . . f2 - < : J A O __ _ _ - - - : : - - ""'" - .... ... ----- ~ " " ' - - i'" ? , ... ,, e,- t ~ - · a · A• t ! f · 1 .. 1/ - ~·~ " : ~ : ' - ' - - - \ , : : - ~ ·-~:-: L_: __ • <- - - - - - .. -- - ··~_.. ; . ""'S '\ · ·. t -T" " " L L J 1- - C : : : - < ( z: : J :: J o CJ ) lJ ' ) .. , f c:o ""'" ,. i · - · · I ~· - Y ~ ___ :- - · - " - "-+ - ,e . , , . - .•; > . + ' l ' i "" ' ... I .. ,_ . I" L •-- L ~ > ! > - - c ·' " ' TO T A L BUI L D I N G ; ~ ~ ! = ~ : ~ · _ . ; . ; 5, 0 2 2 SQ U ~ I ) E ME 1 R E S · " "" · <tr s - r > , _ r ~~ ; 1 _ f l _ .,"' )L ... )'• " " ... ',l - - 1 > · U ·. ~"~{~< : : : ; ! ~ ; ~ ~ · - = · - < " •;. : ' :.( , ' .'f '-" . l . r . ? . t . • . _ , . _ . _ ... . . . e. '2 . , : . ..... : . . : : : ~ .. -.. . _.,· ..... . . . . . . . . . ... '·__; , ; 2 ~ ' " o ... ~;. . , •' '~-~v " ' " <-1 . -- - - - - - ___ ... -;• . : . . : : , - ""· Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 97 / 1 5 AP P L I C A N T : Co m 53 Lt d . .;; _ ... . \- " "'"" .. ?>~ u • ._ . _ , . . , . . :~' v ,,, . , ~O Q , v : - 'w ·1 - : : " ~;· "'" ? -: - ' 1' ' :· ' -~ ~· -~ .... . ' t -.... . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ... . . . . . . .. ...... !i. ... f'!'_ 4• ~JJll \~ \~ -1! "' "'""" ___ } 1; ~ .. \: " \' 1'"<'" r. ; .. !"* . ,"" ~ :~~s;t'il .L~!=f. I -b_ ,,, ,. ~ t ~ ii'l.~~ [t 1; ~ --~ !11 -,, 11 0· <( .0 ; J'o g? t ---~'~ ~i; __ ' : ~~ ~! ~. L :C~. -a: -~ c· >'0 c-: 0 r· J--~ ~-a: '<[fl _;·---<....-• --- 11' tv _,liiJ PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : Co n 1 Pt Lo t 19 , 40 R - 2 9 6 0 , Pa r t 1 (1 08 0 Br o c k Ro a d ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PIC K E R I N G CI T Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T DATE: Aug. 6, 2015 ~ ~ z 0/ H -1 0 ' WI D T H -1 2 ' HE I G H T ~ Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t ~ a. C'J To pe r m i t an in d o o r Ve h i c l e Sa l e s Sh o p ha v i n g a ma x i m u m gr o s s fl o o r ar e a of 45 sq u a r e me t r e s , ac c e s s o r y to a Ve h i c l e Re p a i r Sh o p E "" : N \ ... . I I I 18 . 2 m UN I T 17 46 4 . 5 SQ U A R E ME T R E S CO L U M N r - - ~ C': I 29 ' - 4 " I .... Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : P/ C A 97 / 1 5 AP P L I C A N T : Co m 53 Lt d . I 13'-3" I p I= = ~L, UTILITY SINK 12 ' X 12 ' WITH H/C ST O R A G E WATER /L U N C H RO O M ABOVE p I 1' PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : Co n 1 P t l o t 19 , 40 R - 2 9 6 0 , Pa r t 1 (1 08 0 Br o c k Ro a d ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VI E W I N G AT TH E CI T Y OF PI C K E R I N G CIT Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . +"" DATE: Aug. 6, 2015 co