Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAugust 24, 1999 STATUTORY PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING MINUTES A Statutory Public Information Meeting was held on Tuesday, August 24, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Councillor D. Dickerson, Chair ALSO PRESENT: C. Rose -Manager, Policy Division G. McKnight -Planner 2 D. Kearns - Committee Co-ordinator The Manager, Policy Division, provided an overview of the requirements of the Planning Act and the Ontario Municipal Board respecting this meeting and matters under consideration thereat. (I) OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION 99-004/P ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 22/99 THE PICKERING HARBOUR COMPANY LTD. PART OF LOT 23, RANGE 3, B.F.C. (WEST SIDE OF LIVERPOOL ROAD, SOUTH OF WHARF STREET) AND (II) ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 23/99 G. & A. HILTS PART OF LOT 22, RANGE 3, B.F.C. (EAST SIDE OF LIVERPOOL ROAD, SOUTH OF WHARF STREET) 1. Geoff McKnight, Planner 2, provided an explanation of the Pickering Harbour Co. application, as outlined in Information Report#18-99. 2. Don Given, Malone, Given, Parsons Ltd., representing both the Pickering Harbour Co. and the Hilts, advised that the marina will be maintained, that environmental requirements will be met and a waterfront walkway will be built. A transfer of lands is being negotiated with the Town for the eastern spit and as these lands are transferred they would like to have some idea of what is acceptable for the remaining lands. They are very flexible and willing to work with the residents to reach a consensus. 3. David Steele, Chair of PACT, stated their opposition to the application and requested a detailed design study be undertaken of the area between West Shore Boulevard and Sandy Beach Road. 4. Craig Bamford, 528 Marksbury Road, stated that the Waterfront 2001 Task Force Report was received and accepted by Council. He commented on IDT Report 08- 98 which contained staffs comments to Council with respect to actions which should be taken on recommendations contained in the Mayor's Task Force Report. He outlined the priorities recommended by the Task Force to include: a) reversing environmental damage to restore the long-term health of Frenchman's Bay; b) • improving access to the waterfront, particularly in regards to improving access to the water's edge; c) improving the channel entrance to Frenchman's Bay; d) developing an economic and tourism strategy, focusing on a well designed commercial node at the foot of Liverpool Road with a distinctive "promenade" along the waterfront; e) establishing guidelines for the development of the - 2 - waterfront, including the commercial node at the foot of Liverpool Road and f) capturing the uniqueness of Pickering's waterfront and providing attractions that produce the critical mass necessary to both serve the needs of Pickering's residents and make Pickering a tourist destination. Planning staff should be encouraged to proceed with a Liverpool Road detailed design study and implementation timetable with full participation of all landowners and the public. He recommended that the applicant request the town to delay further consideration of this application. 5. David Steele read the submission of Professor Eyles advising that the need for regeneration of the area at the foot of Liverpool Road was highlighted in the Mayor's Task Force on the Pickering Waterfront. He outlined the Environmental concerns to include: a) adequate provision for stormwater management; b) the widening of the entrance to Frenchman's Bay in terms of impacts on the wetland in the northern part of the Bay by increased water circulation; and c) the possible presence of contaminated soil/groundwater within the former marina property. Pickering Harbour Co. should be urged to integrate Phase II with Phase I and ensure the provision of public facilities. 6. Torn Mohr, 842 Naroch Blvd., representing Pickering Historical Society, stated that these applications defy the word and spirit of the public will, therefore, should go through a rigorous planning process. The applicants had an opportunity to challenge the Official Plan but chose not to: We have Council endorsement, through the O.P. and the Mayor's Task Force, of a Detailed Review of this area. The Harbour Company also endorsed the Waterfront 2001 project. A detailed review must be conducted. He requested that Council decline any consideration of these applications and presented two questions: 1) is a dollar value attached to the east spit; and 2)what about contaminated dumping at the end of the east spit. 7. Terry White, Chair of Brock East Community Assoc., 1547 Marshcourt Dr. stated the this application is a fundamental departure from the existing urban fabric and is narrow focused in its design. The regeneration proposals for the bottom of Liverpool Road are of major significance. The proposed zoning by-law amendment application is contrary to the visions and objectives of the Official Plan and Mayor's Task Force on the Pickering Waterfront. The Town should require the completion of development guidelines prior to permitting this major development. Issues such as public access, environmental impact, tourism objectives, traffic impact, private ownership and public ownership of lands, street design and compatibility of proposed developments massing and density with surrounding urban fabric should be addressed. 8. David Steele, Chair of PACT, once again stated his opposition to these applications and stressed the need for a detailed design study. 9. Paul Kelland, 921 Liverpool Road, representing PESCA, advised that a brochure was distributed to area residents advising of these applications. He requested deferral until a detailed design study was completed. 10. Councillor Mark Holland, 1220 Monica Cook Place, advised that the process and vision cannot be compromised. He further stated that 40 townhouse units are unacceptable in this area. Diverse use and high quality development in the Town is essential. 11. Councillor Dave Ryan, 1028 Rouge Valley Dr., stated his endorsement of the Waterfront 2001 Task Force Report at the time of publication and advised that he will continue to endorse this document. 12. Jacklyn Smart, 829 Fairview Ave., commented on the Waterfront 2001 Task Force Report which was initiated by Mayor Arthurs, finalized in June of 1997 and accepted by Council in 1997 with no exceptions. She outlined aspects of the report and recommended support of these initiatives. She requested that Mr. Hough and Mr. &Mrs. Hilts withdraw their applications. 13. Paul Crawford, 867 Antonio St., stated his dislike for the townhouse component of the application. He commented that Phase I is not appropriate development for this area. He requested that development guidelines be completed prior to development. 14. Hugh Wilson, 683 Pleasant St., stated that the eastern spit and remnants of the western spit look like a war zone. He emphasized that the residents trust that Council will do the right thing when considering this application. 15. Councillor Maurice Brenner, 4605 Westney Road, stated no opposition or support for this application but commented on the Durham District School Board and Durham Catholic District School Board comments regarding development guidelines. He pointed out that the Durham District School Board made no comment concerning the development guidelines but the Durham Catholic District School Board supports the completion of development guidelines prior to permitting major development. 16. Eileen Higdon, 852 Fairview Ave., questioned if the detailed design study has been budgeted for 1999 and if there would be any problems if application was postponed. 17. Joan Skelton, 717 Simpson Ave., stated her opposition to the application and reiterated the previous comments. 18. Don Given, Malone, Given, Parsons Ltd., advised that the design study is expected to be undertaken but in the absence of the study, they decided to submit their application. They are willing to postpone moving ahead with the application until the study is completed if done in a reasonable amount of time. He stated that a meeting with Prof Eyles would be welcome and also that an environmental study would be carried out. 19. Councillor Mark Holland, advised of and requested the residents to sign the sign-in sheets in the Clerk's Department. He further advised that he introduced a Motion at the August Council Meeting which will come forward in September concerning undertaking a detailed design review of the area. 20. Councillor Doug Dickerson, advised that all issues identified this evening would be reviewed by staff prior to the application coming before Council and that it is the will of residents that the study be undertaken. He questioned if all comments made were to apply to both applications. The response was affirmative. 21. Catherine Rose, Manager, Policy Division, asked if there was anyone present who was waiting to speak specifically to the Hilts application as described in, Information Report #19-99 who had not yet had an opportunity to provide comments. 22. There were no further delegations. (III) ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Dated 5 E P 1 • 7/9 9 Clerk -