The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOctober 15, 2014Committee of Adjustment Agenda Meeting Number: 14 Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 (I) (II) (Ill) (IV) Adoption of Agenda Committee of Adjustment Agenda Wednesday, October 15, 2014 7:00pm Main Committee Room Page Number Adoption of Minutes from September 24, 2014 1-17 Reports 1. PICA 89114 18-23 C. & L. Gertzos 1972 Glendale Drive 2. PICA 90114 24-27 K. MacKay 830 Reytan Blvd. 3. PICA 92114 28-31 B. & J. Henderson 1731 Lane Street 4. PICA 93114 32-35 C. Annable 1435 Altona Road 5. PICA 96114 & PICA 97114 36-39 Maddy Developments Inc. 578 & 580 Oakwood Drive Adjournment Accessible •-For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Lesley Dunne PICKE~G T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024 TTY 905.420.1739 Email ldunne@pickering.ca ·Pending Adoption Present: David Johnson -Chair Eric Newton Bill Utton Shirley Van Steen -Vice-Chair Also Present: Melissa Markham, Secretary-Treasurer Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Absent: Tom Copeland (I) Adoption of Agenda Moved by Bill Utton Seconded by Eric Newton Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 24, 2014 7:02pm Main Committee Room That the agenda for the Wednesday, September 24, 2014 meeting be adopted. (II) Adoption of Minutes Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Bill Utton Carried Unanimously That the minutes of the 12th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, September 3, 2014, 2014 be adopted as amended. Carried Page 1 of 17 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes 0 2 Wednesday, September 24, 2014 (Ill) Reports 1. Tabled at the July 23, 2014 meeting PICA 68114 to PICA 71114-Revised Nuteck Homes Ltd 1825 1827 Appleview Road Moved by Shirley Van Steen Seconded by Bill Utton 7:02pm Main Committee Room That applications PICA 68114 to PICA 71114 be lifted from the table. Carried Unanimously PICA 68/14 (Proposed Retained Lot-Appleview Road) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.8 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling. The applicant requests approval of four minor variance applications, to create three additional lots (two fronting onto Appleview Road and two fronting onto Heathside Crescent) through the Region of Durham Land Division Committee, in order to permit a detached dwelling on the retained parcel and on each of the proposed severed parcels. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendations from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Sarah & Cesare Molinaro, owners, were present to represent the application. Moved by Shirley Van Steen Seconded by Bill Utton That application PICA 68114 by Nuteck Homes Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres, where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling on the proposed retained parcel are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 17 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 24, 2014 7:02pm Main Committee Room 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed lot configuration for the proposed retained parcel, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtains final clearance for a future land severance to create the proposed retained parcel by December 18, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction on the proposed retained parcel by September 23, 2016, or this decision affecting the reduced side yard widths shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously PICA 69/14 (Proposed Severed Lot-Appleview Road) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.8 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling. The applicant requests approval of four minor variance applications, to create three additional lots (two fronting onto Appleview Road and two fronting onto Heathside Crescent) through the Region of Durham Land Division Committee, in order to permit a detached dwelling on the retained parcel and on each of the proposed severed parcels. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendations from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Sarah & Cesare Molinaro, owners, were present to represent the application. Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Bill Utton That application PICA 69/14 by Nuteck Homes Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling for the proposed severed parcel are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: Page 3 of 17 03 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 24, 2014 7:02pm Main Committee Room 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed lot configuration for the proposed severed parcel, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtains final clearance for a future land severance to create the proposed severed parcel by December 18, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction on the proposed severed parcel by September 23, 2016, or this decision affecting the reduced side yard widths shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously PICA 70/14 (Proposed Severed Lot-Heathside Crescent)-Revised The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum lot frontage of 14.3 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.8 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling. The applicant requests approval of four minor variance applications, to create three additional lots (two fronting onto Appleview Road and two fronting onto Heathside Crescent) through the Region of Durham Land Division Committee, in order to permit a detached dwelling on the retained parcel and on each of the proposed severed parcels. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendations from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department indicating they are satisfied with the revised plan identifying preliminary grading and drainage, and location of driveway entrances. Sarah & Cesare Molinaro, owners, were present to represent the application. Jim Cushnie of 1610 Heathside Crescent was present in objection to applications PICA 70114 and PICA 71114. Page 4 of 17 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 24, 2014 05 7:02pm Main Committee Room Sarah Molinaro indicated she has worked with the City's Engineering & Public Works staff and other agencies to address concerns regarding driveway entrances, the future grading and drainage of the proposed lots, mailbox location, snow storage and the existing light standard. She stated Canada Post has indicated the existing community mailbox on Heathside Crescent will have to be relocated beside the existing community mailbox located at 1599 Heathside Crescent. She also stated that the existing light standard will remain on the property, but will be relocated slightly if there are conflicts with the proposed driveway locations. She stated that existing side yard setbacks along Heathside Crescent are 1.2 metres and the applications are for a minimum 1.5 metre side yard setback. Jim Cushnie was present to represent the concerns of residents along Heathside Crescent. He expressed concerns that the proposed lots are not in keeping with the existing streetscape along Heathside Crescent and the reduction in lot frontages is not minor in nature. He stated many concerns such as: safety, lack of on-street parking, snow storage, re-location of community mailbox and street light, the proposed distance between driveways and concern with the excavation during construction. In response to the concerns of residents Sarah Molinaro indicated that the driveway widths had been reduced in width to accommodate the alignment at the boulevard. She also mentioned that the lot coverage on the proposed lots is lower than what is permitted. A Committee member asked for clarification in regards to the relocation of the community mailbox and how lot frontage is calculated. The Secretary-Treasurer provided a response to the Committee members. Moved by Bill Utton Seconded by Shirley Van Steen That application PICA 70/14 by Nuteck Homes Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the revised minimum lot frontage of 14.3 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling for the proposed severed parcel are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: Page 5 of 17 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 24, 2014 7:02pm Main Committee Room 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed lot configuration for the proposed severed parcel, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtains final clearance for a future land severance to create the proposed severed parcel by December 18, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction on the proposed severed parcel by September 23, 2016, or this decision affecting the reduced side yard widths shall become null and void. Vote David Johnson Eric Newton Bill Utton Shirley Van Steen in favour opposed in favour in favour Carried PICA 71/14 (Proposed Severed Lot-Heathside Crescent)-Revised The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum lot frontage of 14.4 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.8 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling. The applicant requests approval of four minor variance applications, to create three additional lots (two fronting onto Appleview Road and two fronting onto Heathside Crescent) through the Region of Durham Land Division Committee, in order to permit a detached dwelling on the retained parcel and on each of the proposed severed parcels. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendations from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department indicating they are satisfied with the revised plan identifying preliminary grading and drainage, and location of driveway entrances. Page 6 of 17 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 24, 2014 0 7 7:02pm Main Committee Room Sarah & Cesare Molinaro, owners, were present to represent the application. Jim Cushnie of 1610 Heaths ide Crescent was present in objection to applications PICA 70114 and PICA 71114. The comments of the residents were presented with application PICA 70114. Moved by Shirley Van Steen Seconded by Bill Utton That application PICA 71114 by Nuteck Homes Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the revised minimum lot frontage of 14.4 metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling for the proposed severed parcel are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed lot configuration for the proposed severed parcel, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtains final clearance for a future land severance to create the proposed severed parcel by December 18, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction on the proposed severed parcel by September 23, 2016, or this decision affecting the reduced side yard widths shall become null and void. Vote David Johnson Eric Newton Bill Utton Shirley Van Steen in favour opposed in favour in favour Carried Page 7 of 17 08 2. Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 24, 2014 7:02pm Main Committee Room Deferred at the September 3, 2014 meeting PICA 75/14-Revised C. Sewell 663 Front Road The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 2511, as amended: • to permit a maximum lot coverage for all accessory buildings of 6 percent of the total lot area; whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 5 percent of the total lot area for all accessory buildings, and • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 34 percent for all buildings and structures; whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent for all buildings and structures The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to recognize an accessory building (shed) to remain in the rear yard. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending refusal. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department indicating the revised siting of the proposed shed will provide adequate grading and drainage. Written comments were received from J. Maingot of 665 Front Road, J. & K. Avis of 595 Annland Street and M. & M. Metcalfe of 667 Front Road indicating no objection to the applicant's proposal. Additional comments received from K. Yates of 602 Annland Street indicating no objection to the applicant's revised proposal. Chris Sewell, owner, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Chris Sewell advised the Committee that he would be relocating the shed to the required 1.0 metre setback from property lines. In regards to the increase in coverage he provided pictures of large accessory structures in the surrounding nieghbourhood for the Committee to review. In response to questions from the Committee, Chris Sewell indicated he does not have a garage and the shed will be used for storage of seasonal equipment. In response to a question from the Committee, staff indicated that the shed would have to be reduced by 4.0 square metres to comply with the zoning by-law requirements. Page 8 of 17 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 24, 2014 09 7:02pm Main Committee Room The applicant stated that the shed has been constructed, excluding siding and eaves troughs. The applicant agreed to install eaves and downspouts on the shed and to erect a fence to screen the structure from the adjacent property. Moved by Shirley Van Steen Seconded by Bill Utton That application PICA 75114 by C. Sewell, be Approved on the grounds that the maximum lot coverage of 6 percent for all accessory structures and a maximum lot coverage of 34 percent for all buildings and structures are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the accessory structure (shed), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's revised submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by March 27, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. PICA 82114 S. Jamieson & K. Nakamura 1779 Silverthorn Square Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1493182: • to permit a canopy to project a maximum of 3.6 metres into the required rear yard; whereas canopies are not permitted to encroach into the required rear yard, and • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 40 percent for all buildings and structures; whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent for all buildings and structures The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to construct an accessory building (shed) and a canopy in the rear yard. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no concerns. Page 9 of 17 10 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 24, 2014 7:02pm Main Committee Room Shawn Jamieson & Keiko Nakamura, owners, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Bill Utton Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 82114 by S. Jamieson & K. Nakamura, be Approved on the grounds that the proposed canopy projecting a maximum of 3.6 metres into the required rear yard and a maximum lot coverage of 40 percent are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed accessory building (shed) and canopy, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by September 23, 2016, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously 4. PICA 83114 M. & E. Kim 729 Breezy Drive The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 2520, as amended: • to permit a minimum east side yard width of 0.9 of a metre to a proposed second storey addition; whereas the by-law requires minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres where a garage is erected as part of a detached dwelling, and • to recognize an existing shed less than 10.0 square metres in area setback a minimum of 0.4 of a metre from the east side lot line and 0.5 of a metre from the rear lot line; whereas the by-law requires accessory structures less than 10.0 square metres in area to be setback a minimum of 0.6 of a metre from all lot lines The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to construct a second storey addition above an existing garage and to recognize an existing shed. Page 10 of 17 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 24, 2014 11 7:02pm Main Committee Room The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no concerns. Written comments were also received from Kevin Ashe, City Councillor, Ward 1 in support of the application. Maylynn Kim, owner, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Bill Utton That application PICA 83114 by M. & E. Kim, be Approved on the grounds that the minimum east side yard width of 0.9 of a metre for a proposed second storey addition and recognizing an existing shed less than 10.0 square metres in area setback a minimum of 0.4 of a metre from the east side lot line and 0.5 of a metre from the rear lot line are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of . the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed second storey addition and the existing shed, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by September 23, 2016 or this decision shall become null and void. 5. PICA 84114 C. McMannis 1315 Wharf Street Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 2511, as amended: • to recognize the existing east side yard width of 1.2 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres, and • to permit a minimum front yard depth of 4.5 metres to the proposed front porch; whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard depth of 7.5 metres Page 11 of 17 12 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 24, 2014 7:02pm Main Committee Room The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to allow for the construction of an attached garage on the lower level and a front porch addition to the existing dwelling. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no concerns. Written comments were also received from Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) indicating on December 13, 2013 TRCA approved a permit to reconstruct the existing basement walkout, repair the dwelling foundations and replace the existing deck. No further objections to the requested variances, however, the owner should contact TRCA to confirm if a TRCA permit approval or clearance is required for the proposed construction. Cade McMannis, owner, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Shirley Van Steen Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 84/14 by C. McMannis, be Approved on the grounds that the existing east side yard width of 1.2 metres, and the minimum front yard depth of 4.5 metres to a proposed front porch are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed construction of an attached garage on the lower level and a front porch addition to the existing dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by September 23, 2016, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously Page 12 of 17 6. PICA 85114 P. & C. Carvalho 1 004 Albacore Manor Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 24, 2014 7:02pm Main Committee Room The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 1299181 : • to recognize an existing uncovered platform (deck) not exceeding 3.0 metres in height above grade to project a maximum of 3.6 metres into the required rear yard; whereas the by-law does not permit an uncovered platform to project into the required rear yard, and • to permit a minimum rear yard depth of 4.0 metres to a proposed second storey addition (enclosed sunroom); whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to construct a second storey sunroom addition and to recognize an existing uncovered deck in the rear yard. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no concerns. Bob Davidson, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Shirley Van Steen Seconded by Bill Utton That application PICA 85114 by P. & C. Carvalho, be Approved on the grounds that the uncovered platform (deck) not exceeding 3.0 metres in height above grade projecting a maximum of 3.6 metres into the required rear yard and a minimum rear yard depth of 4.0 metres to a second storey addition (enclosed sunroom) are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the existing deck and proposed second storey addition (enclosed sunroom), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. Page 13 of 17 13 'l~ I' . "'1: Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 24, 2014 7:02pm Main Committee Room 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the construction by September 23, 2016, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously 7. PICA 86114 D. Kelly & S. Head 578 Creekview Circle The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-laws 4354/73 and 4470173, to permit an uncovered platform not exceeding 2.5 metres in height above grade to encroach a maximum of 0.5 of a metre into the required minimum rear yard and to permit uncovered stairs to encroach an additional 1.0 metre into the required minimum rear yard; whereas the by-law does not permit uncovered steps or platforms to encroach into the required rear yard. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct an uncovered deck and stairs within the required rear yard. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no concerns. Written comments were also received from Kevin Ashe, City Councillor, Ward 1 in support of the application. Robert Reid, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Bill Utton Seconded by Shirley Van Steen That application PICA 86114 by D. Kelly & S. Head, be Approved on the grounds that the uncovered platform not exceeding 2.5 metres in height above grade to encroach a maximum of 0.5 of a metre into the required minimum rear yard and to permit uncovered stairs to encroach an additional 1.0 metre into the required minimum rear yard are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance applies only to the proposed uncovered platform and stairs as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. Page 14 of 17 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 24, 2014 15 7:02pm Main Committee Room 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by September 23, 2016 or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously 8. PICA 87/14 Marshall Land Corp. Ltd. Nordane Drive (Pt. Lot 24, Plan 329, Part 3 40R-27800) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 7274/13, to permit a maximum lot coverage of 45 percent and a minimum east side yard width of 0.6 of a metre; whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent and a minimum side yard width of 1.2 metres each side. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct a two-storey detached dwelling. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no concerns. Samantha Bateman, an employee of Marshall Homes, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Bill Utton That application PICA 87/14 by Marshall Land Corp. Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the maximum lot coverage of 45 percent and a minimum east side yard width of 0.6 of a metre are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the requested variances apply only to the proposed detached dwelling as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed detached dwelling, by September 23, 2016, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously Page 15 of 17 9. PICA 88114 J. & C. Johnston 979 Mountcastle Crescent Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 24, 2014 7:02pm Main Committee Room The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1998185, to permit an uncovered platform (deck) not exceeding 2.5 metres in height above grade to project a maximum of 2.2 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct an uncovered platform (deck) within the required rear yard. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Engineering & Public Works Department expressing no concerns. John & Caryn Johnston, owners, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Shirley Van Steen Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 88114 by J. & C. Johnston, be Approved on the grounds that the uncovered platform (deck) not exceeding 2.5 .metres in height above grade to project a maximum of 2.2 metres into the required rear yard are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and is in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the uncovered platform (deck) as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by September 23, 2016 or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously Page 16 of 17 Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 24, 2014 1 7 7:02pm Main Committee Room (IV) Adjournment Date Chair Moved by Bill Utton Seconded by Shirley Van Steen That the 13th meeting of the 2014 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 8:15 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, October 15, 2014. Carried Unanimously Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Page 17 of 17 18 From: Subject: Application Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 89114 Meeting Date: October 15, 2014 Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 89114 C. & L Gertzos 1972 Glendale Drive The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 3036, as amended: • to permit accessory buildings (detached garage and hot tub) to be partially located in the required side yards; whereas the by-law requires all accessory buildings which are not part of the main building to be erected in the rear yard • to recognize a 0.8 of a metre south side yard width to an existing accessory building (detached garage); whereas the by-law requires all accessory buildings be set back a minimum of 1.0 metre from all lot lines, and • to recognize an existing uncovered platform (deck) not exceeding 1.4 metres in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.4 metres into the required north side yard; whereas the by-law permits uncovered platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 0.5 of a metre into the required side yard The applicant requests approval of these minor variances in order to allow an existing detached garage and hot tub to be partially located in the south and north side yards respectively, and to recognize the location of an existing deck within the required north side yard. Recommendation The City Development Department considers accessory buildings (detached garage and hot tub) to be partially located in the required side yards; a minimum 0.8 of a metre south side yard width to an existing accessory building (detached garage), and a maximum projection of 1.4 metres into the required north side yard for an existing uncovered platform (deck) 1.4 metres in height above grade to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the existing detached garage, hot tub and deck, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed one-storey addition as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans, or the decision affecting the existing detached garage and hot tub proposed to be partially located in the south and north side yards respectively shall become null and void. Report PICA 89/14 Background October 15, 2014 Page 2 19 The applicant has submitted a building permit for a one-storey addition at the rear of the existing detached dwelling. As a result of the proposed addition, the existing garage and hot tub will be partially located in the south and north side yards respectively, and no longer be completely located within the rear yard, which is not permitted under the zoning by-law. Following the circulation of the Public Notice, Planning Staff conducted a site inspection which determined that the existing hot tub complied with the minimum side yard setback requirement and therefore staff has removed this variance from the application. Staff also recognized that the hot tub will also be deemed to be in the north side yard upon completion of the rear yard addition to the dwelling and have therefore included this as an additional variance required for this application. The City Development Department is satisfied that this amendment is in accordance with the spirit and intent of the applicant's requested variances and has revised the requested variances pertaining to the existing hot tub as follows: Previous Relief Applied For Revised Requested Relief Applied For to recognize a 0.4 of a metre north side to permit an existing accessory structure yard width to an existing accessory (hot tub) to be partially located in the north structure (hot tub); whereas the zoning side yard; whereas the zoning by-law by-law requires that all accessory requires all accessory buildings which are buildings must be set back a minimum of not part of the main building to be erected 1.0 metre from all lot lines in the rear yard Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan-"Urban Residential -Low Density Areas" within the Liverpoool Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036 -"R3" -Third Density Residential Zone Appropriateness of the Application Accessory Buildings/Structures Located in the Side Yard Variance • the intent of the by-law requirement that all accessory buildings/structures shall be erected in the rear yard is to minimize their visual impact on the street, to ensure that they act as an accessory structure to the principal use of the property, and to ensure that unobstructed access to the rear of the property is available • the detached garage and hot tub are currently located in the rear yard of the property, however due to the proposed rear addition to the existing dwelling, the structures will be located in the side yards Report PICA 89/14 October 15, 2014 20 Page 3 • the existing detached garage and hot tub partially located within the south and north side yards respectively do not appear to have a negative visual impact on the street or adjacent properties • adequate space will be maintained between the existing structures to ensure that unobstructed access to the rear of the property is available • the requested variances are minor in nature, are desirable for the appropriate development of the property and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Accessory Building Setback Variance • the intent of the minimum 1.0 metre setback requirement for accessory structures greater than 1.8 metres in height, and 0.6 metres for other accessory structures is to minimize the visual impact that their location may have on adjacent properties, and to ensure that adequate access for maintenance is available to the sides of the structures • the detached garage is an existing structure on the property and its location does not appear to have a negative visual impact on adjacent properties • accessibility between the garage and the south lot line will be maintained • the requested variance is minor in nature, is desirable for the appropriate development of the property and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Increased Projection of Uncovered Steps and Platforms into the Side Yard Variance • the intent of this provision is to ensure that appropriate setbacks are provided to protect the privacy of abutting property owners and allow for appropriate access for maintenance, lot grading and drainage • the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project not more than 0.5 of a metre into the required side yard • the uncovered deck is an existing structure on the property which projects 1.4 metres into the required side yard • the existing grades established on the north side of the property between the dwelling appears to restrict access from the front yard to the rear yard • the existing deck appears to have minimal impact on adjacent properties, however, accessibility between the north lot line and the deck for maintenance purposes, grading and drainage is limited • the existing deck will not impact the privacy of the north adjacent land owner since it sides onto an existing shed owned by the north adjacent land owner • the requested variance is minor in nature, is desirable for the appropriate development of the property and maintains the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Report PICA 89/14 Date of report: October 9, 2014 Comments prepared by: AY:NS:Id J:\Documents\Development\0·3700\2014 \PC A 89·14\Report\PCA 89-14.doc Enclosures r . r Nilesh S~rti, \MCIP, RPP October 15, 2014 21 Page4 Manager, Development Review & Urban Design ')2 "" City Development Department - 1-- 1--- f- 1-- GLENDALE 1972 Glendale Drive To pe r m i t an ex i s t i n g ho t tu b to be pa r t i a l l y lo c a t e d in th e no r t h si d e ya r d E "" : To pe r m i t an ex i s t i n g un c o v e r e d de c k to pr o j e c t a ma x i m u m of 1.4 me t r e s in t o th e no r t h si d e ya r d I 0 . - r- ; : - : : : : : : : - - ' . (! ) -- - - - 7 ( 60 . 9 m I 1 z :::c : 1 \ F - - - E X IS TI N G - t f ..• f= ~ I I~ N EX I S T I N G PO O L t 6- - - - - - - . EX I S T I N G Cl- l A I N I LIN K FE N C E t + - - ~-- - · ; : _ : - - EX I S T I N G f -- + 6. 7 m ~P O O L I l_ _ _ [_ _ _ _ j j SH E D ~ I t - l E co N Su b m i t t e d Pl a n FI L E No : PI C A 89 / 1 4 HO T TU B i i. K . ~ o !S T I N G 1 . • ''n · x PO R T I O N OFE~ ; I N L ~ . i 1 UJ OW O 00 R b! : : - - PR O P O S E D NE l - l SI N G L E ST O R E Y AD D I T I O N (5 1 - l O N N SH A D E D ) E 60 . 9 m (" ' ) I' - \ . . - - + - - - - t ~ E o 0 ) 0 To pe r m i t an ex i s t i n g so u t h si d e ya r d wi d t h of 0. 8 me t r e s to a de t a c h e d aa r a a e AP P L I C A N T : C. & L. Ge r t z o s Ci t y De v e l o p m e n t De p a r t m e n t PR O P E R T Y DE S C R I P T I O N : 19 7 2 Gl e n d a l e Dr i v e (L o t 30 , Pl a n 52 1 ) FU L L SC A L E CO P I E S OF TH I S PL A N AR E AV A I L A B L E FO R VIE W I N G AT TH E CIT Y OF PI C K E R I N G CI T Y DE V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . E co N N 9. 1 m ~· EX I S T I N G DR I V E N A Y To pe r m i t an ex i s t i n g de t a c h e d ga r a g e to be pa r t i a l l y lo c a t e d in th e so u t h si d e ya r d ---r d w > 0:::: 0 w ...J <.( 0 z w ...J (!) 1' DATE: Sept. 18,2014 rv w 24 From: Subject: Application Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 90/14 Meeting Date: October 15, 2014 Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 90/14 K. MacKay 830 Reytan Boulevard The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended, to permit an unenclosed covered carport having a minimum front yard depth of 7.0 metres and a minimum flankage side yard width of 3.0 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard depth of 7.5 metres and a minimum flankage side yard width of 4.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to construct an unenclosed covered carport within the west side yard. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the minimum front yard depth of 7.0 metres and minimum flankage side yard width of 3.0 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed carport, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant removes/relocates the existing shed currently located in the west flankage side yard to be in compliance with the zoning by-law requirements prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by October 14, 2016, or this decision shall become null and void. Report PICA 90/14 Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law October 15, 2014 Page 2 Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential -Low Density Areas" within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 2520-"RM1"-First Density Residential Zone Appropriateness of the Application Front Yard Depth and Flankage Side Yard Width Variances • the intent of a minimum front yard depth is to ensure that an adequate landscaped area, parking area and separation distance is provided between the dwelling and the front lot line • the intent of a minimum flankage yard width is to provide an adequate separation distance between buildings and street activity and to maintain an adequate landscaped area • the proposed front yard depth of 7.0 metres to an unenclosed covered carport will maintain an adequate landscaped area and parking area in the front yard in keeping with other dwellings in the neighbourhood • an adequate driveway entrance supporting a parking area between the proposed carport and street can be maintained • the proposed 3.0 metre flankage side yard width will maintain an adequate separation distance between the proposed carport and Krosno Boulevard and will be partially screened by an existing fence located along the westerly limits of the property • the proposed carport is in keeping with the established neighbourhood character • the requested front yard depth and west flankage side yard width variances are minor in nature and meets the purpose and intent of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law Date of report: October 9, 2014 Comments prepared by: Nilesh urti, MCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review & Urban Design AY:NS:Id J:\Documents\Development\0·3700\2014 \PC A 90-14\Report\PCA 90-14.doc Enclosures 25 Cw,"l ~~ ~ City Development Department Location Map FILE No: PICA 90/14 APPLICANT: K. MacKay 0 )> 01--------1 0 <t: 0 n:: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 830 Reytan Blvd (Lot 647, Plan M11) DATE: Sept. 17,2014 SCALE 1 :5,000 PN-12 0 ~ ~ w _J ~ 0 c::a 0 z (/) 0 ~ ~ To permit a minimum flankage side yard width of 3.0 metres to an unenclosed covered carport . f • E 0 27 18.2m • REYTAN BOULEVARD To permit a minimum front yard depth of 7.0 metres to an unenclosed covered car art City Development Department Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 90/14 APPLICANT: K. MacKay PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 830 Re Lot 647, Plan M11 DATE: Sept. 17,2014 ')8 (.., From: Subject: Application Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment · Application Number: PICA 92114 Meeting Date: October 15, 2014 Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 92114 B. & J. Henderson 1731 Lane Street The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640106, to permit an addition to an existing accessory building (detached garage) partially located within the west side yard; whereas the by-law requires all accessory buildings which are not part of the main building to be erected in the rear yard. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct an addition to an existing accessory building (detached garage) partially located within the side yard. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the addition to an existing accessory building (detached garage) partially located within the west side yard to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the lands, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance applies only to the proposed addition to the detached garage as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by October 14, 2016, or this decision shall become null and void. Background On October 12, 1995, the Committee of Adjustment approved Minor Variance application PICA 80195 to recognize a reduced lot area, a reduced east side yard width, and a reduced minimum floor area for the main dwelling in order to bring the existing property into compliance with the zoning by-law and to issue a building permit for a detached garage. In September 1996, a building permit was approved for an addition to the rear of the existing dwelling. As a result of the addition the existing detached garage was deemed to be located in the side yard, which does not comply with the accessory structure requirement in the zoning by-law. In order to permit an addition to the existing detached garage a minor variance is required to permit the structure to remain in its current location within the west side yard. Report PICA 92/14 Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law October 15, 2014 Page 2 Pickering Official Plan -Oak Ridges Moraine Rural Hamlets, Claremont Hamlet Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by 6640/06,-"ORM-5"-Oak Ridges Moraine- Hamlet Residential Five Zone Appropriateness of the Application Accessory Structure (Detached Garage) Located Partially in the West Side Yard • the intent of the by-law requirement that all accessory buildings shall be erected in the rear yard is to minimize their visual impact on the streetscape, and to ensure that they act as an accessory structure to the principle use of the property • the detached garage was originally located in the rear yard of the property, however, due to an addition to the rear of the dwelling it is now deemed to be located in the side yard • the existing detached garage is setback approximately 20 metres from the front property line • the existing detached garage and proposed addition do not appear to have a negative visual impact on the street or on adjacent property owners • the requested variance is minor in nature and maintains the intent of the zoning by-law Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works Building Services Date of report: October 8, 2014 Comments prepared by: \ ~· . ~ Deepak Bhatt, MCIP, RPP Planner II DB:NS:Id J:\Oocuments\Development\D-3700\2014\PCA 92-14\Report\PCA 92-14.doc Enclosures • no concerns • no concerns or comments / Nilesh S i, MCIP, RPP Mal)ager, Development Review & Urban Design 29 30 f-w w Q:' f-Ul 2 <( =:J _j ~ City Development Department 0 <( 0 Q:' CLAREMON a <( 0 a:: ~ (.) 0 a:: Q) Lot 22 Plan 1 DATE: Sept. 21, 2014 SCALE 1 :5,000 LANE STREET ,_.,--~.-..·-::::.------· ···------------- To permit an addition to an existing accessory building (detached garage) partially located within the west side yard E co "¢ ('I) ' ..; ~ 1.9m---.' 6.0m EXISTING DETACHED GARAGE ............... PROPOSED GARAGE ADDITION ..- l •• §l>lr. t E ~ CD ~ Submitted Plan E CD 1'- E 0 CD FILE No: P/CA 92/14 24.3m ('I) ('I) T""" j 12.1m E EXISTING ('I) 1'-2 STOREY DWELLING 24.3m APPLICANT: B. & J. Henderson 31 E co "¢ ('I) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 1731 Lane Street (Part Lot 22 Plan 12) City Development Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: Sept. 23, 2014 32 From: Subject: Application Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 93114 Meeting Date: October 15, 2014 Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 93114 C. Annable 1435 Altona Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended, to permit a minimum lot frontage of 16.0 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to create one additional lot through the Region of Durham Land Division Committee for a detached dwelling .. Recommendation The City Development Department considers a minimum lot frontage of 16.0 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the lands, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance applies only to the proposed retained parcel as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by October 14, 2016, or this decision shall become null and void. Background The applicant has submitted a Consent Application (LD 09112014) to the Region of Durham Land Division Committee for the subject property in order to create one additional residential lot along Fiddlers Court. In support of the Consent Application, the owner has requested a minor variance to reduce the minimum lot frontage requirement for the retained parcel from 18.0 metres to 16.0 metres. Approval of this Minor Variance Application will allow the owner to create two developable lots fronting Fiddlers Court. Report PICA 93/14 October 15, 2014 Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential -Low Density Areas" within the Rougemount Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036-"R3"-Detached Dwelling (Third Density Residential Zone) Appropriateness of the Application Reduction in Lot Frontage Page 2 • the intent of the minimum lot frontage requirement is to ensure a usable lot size that is compatible with the neighbourhood • the proposed retained parcel is approximately 19.0 metres in width at the rear of the lot • due to the requirement for a daylight triangle, the owner is requesting the minimum lot frontage for the proposed retained parcel be reduced from 18.0 metres to 16.0 metres • the proposed retained parcel with a reduced lot frontage will provide an adequate landscaped area, and parking will continue to be provided within the front yard • the proposed retained lot is appropriately sized and will be consistent with the character of the established neighbourhood along Fiddlers Court • the severed and retained parcels will comply with all other zoning provisions such as lot coverage, lot depth, and side yard requirements • the requested variance to reduce the minimum lot frontage is minor in nature and maintains the intent and purpose of the Official Plan, Rougemount Neighbourhood Development Guidelines and the Zoning By-law Date of report: October 8, 2014 Comments prepared by: D~(J. -c;;;a ~aray, MCIP, RPP Planner II LP:NS:Id J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2014 \PC A 93-14\Report\PCA 93_14.doc Enclosures Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review & Urban Design 33 34 HOWELL El CRESCENT ~ City Development Department ST. MONICA :5' SEPARATE SCHOOL FILE No: PICA 93/14 APPLICANT: C. Annable lan 228 Pt Lot 12, DATE: Sept. 21, 2014 0 <( 0 0::: <( z 0 1--_.J <( E -.:t: 00 ...... City Development Department FIDDLERS COURT 12.6m PROPOSED DWELLING L _________ ...J PROPOSED RETAINED PARCEL 19. m Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 93/14 APPLICANT: C. Annable E 0 ("'") ("'") 18.0m To permit a minimum lot frontage of 16.0 metres PROPOSED SEVERED PARCEL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 1435Aitona Road (Plan 228 Pt Lot 12, 40R-11813 Part 6) 35 FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: Sept. 25, 2014 From: Subject: Applications Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP --------------------- Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: PICA 96114 & PICA 97114 Meeting Date: October 15, 2014 Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Committee of Adjustment Applications PICA 96114 & PICA 97114 Maddy Developments Inc. 578 & 580 Oakwood Drive PICA 96114 (580 Oakwood Drive} The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended, to permit a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent; whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. PICA 97114 (578 Oakwood Drive} The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended, to permit a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent; whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain building permits to facilitate the development of two lots for detached dwellings. Recommendation PICA 96114 (580 Oakwood Drive} The City Development Department considers a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the lands, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance applies only to the proposed dwelling as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by October 14, 2016, or this decision shall become null and void. Recommendation PICA 97114 (578 Oakwood Drive} The City Development Department considers a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the lands, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance applies only to the proposed dwelling as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. Report PICA 96114 & PICA 97114 October 15, 2014 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by October 14, 2016, or this decision shall become null and void. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Page 2 Pickering Official Plan -"Urban Residential -Low Density Areas" within the Rosebank Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 2511 -"R4"-Fourth Density Residential Zone Appropriateness of the Application Increase in Lot Coverage • the intent of the maximum lot coverage provision is to ensure that the overall size, scale and massing of a dwelling is appropriate for the lot size and to ensure an adequate amount of outdoor amenity area remains uncovered by buildings on a lot • the increase in lot coverage from 33 to 38 percent will not change the character of these properties or the area • staff are of the opinion that the proposed development will maintain a sufficient amount of outdoor amenity area that will remain uncovered and unobstructed on each lot and will provide for the appropriate development of the land as the size and massing of the proposed dwellings will be in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighbourhood • the requested increase in lot coverage is minor in nature and will meet the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law Input From Other Sources Engineering & Public Works Building Services Date of report: October 8, 2014 Comments prepared by: \/ ~/ Deepak Bhatt, MCIP, RPP Planner II DB:MM:Id • no concerns • no concerns or comments Nilesh urti, MCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review & Urban Design J:\Documents\Development\D-3700\2014\PCA 96-14 & PCA 97-14\Report\PCA 96-14 & PCA 97-14t.doc Enclosures 37 3~ Cit~J"I ~~ rmmc City Development Department ------------------- l I ~~~t=~~~------~ t----1------1 Cl:: 1------t------l =s t-----1------l 1------+----l I t-----1------l t-----1------l 0 1-----1------1 ;'!i t-----1------l SCALE 1 :5,000 PICA 96114 To permit a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent ' ~\ 32.S. ' • -·--··-···--~~:. ............ J ..... \\:::···~--~---....-~--2-3-.7--~~~=-·=· =···=···=· =--·=-=--=--·=·--=-~-___, I .r-.,'----4 I' 7.9 i/ . ! 8.1 ! ' l I' 0 It) ! I PROPOSED DWELLING i i H-----~~--~~~ 7.6 It) ,... I ! i Oi' 0 ~ i i i i i --·------·---··-------··-----~ f-~-~---------;------'-+------··---·--------------···-" I ..r a 32.5 I i 8.7 ~ 23.7 i -------------··-·---··----·+· n ir---,...-----------..Lt-·---··-------=--··--·- 0 It) ,... 7.9 I ! i i I i I i I i ! I PROPOSED DWELLING --------~-~-=LO"E=...I __ -_L------...:ll=i======.·-==1 .. , I = PICA 97114 To permit a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent Submitted Plan FILE No: P/CA 96/14 & P/CA 97/14 APPLICANT: Maddy Developments Inc. w > 0::: 0 0 0 0 s: ~ <( 0 1' PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 578 & 580 Oakwood Drive (Pt Lt 66, Plan 350, City Development Department 40R-28284 Pt 5, 8 & Pt Lt 66, Plan 350, 40R-28284 Pt 4, 7) FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: Sept. 26, 2014