Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOctober 16, 2013 Committee of Adjustment Agenda ... c c .61 a 12it J‘ „1:7•=6...H1 a ;' utIE ` 1 I I —moo o+ = 'e IfffffffliFFfill piGKERING Meeting Number: 13 Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 I�� Cal/ 00 Committee of Adjustment Agenda PI KERIN Wednesday, October 16, 2013 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Page Number (I) Adoption of Agenda (II) Adoption of Minutes from September 25, 2013 1-3 (III) Reports 1. P/CA 46/13 Emix Ltd. 4-9 1101 Kingston Road 2. P/CA 48/13 M. & M. Weatherbee 10-15 1425 Finch Avenue 3. P/CA 49/13 D. Hansen & C. MacMillan 16-21 717 Breezy Drive (IV) Adjournment Accessible • For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Lesley Dunne P I C K S FN G T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024 TTY 905.420.1739 Email Idunne @pickering.ca Cat/ a¢t Committee of Adjustment IjkIj' • Meeting Minutes fll - _ Wednesday, September 25, 2013 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Pending Adoption Present: Tom Copeland David Johnson — Chair Eric Newton Shirley Van Steen — Vice-Chair Also Present: Melissa Markham, Principal Planner— Development Review Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Absent: Bill Utton (I) Adoption of Agenda Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Tom Copeland That the agenda for the Wednesday, September 25, 2013 meeting be adopted. Carried Unanimously (II) Adoption of Minutes Moved by Shirley Van Steen Seconded by Eric Newton That the minutes of the 11th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, September 4, 2013 be adopted. Carried Unanimously Page 1 of 3 Cif,/ o� Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes n2 #114. Wednesday, September 25, 2013 PI ��_ 7:00 pm Main Committee Room (III) Reports t P/CA 45/13 Eco-Tec Limited 1145 Squires Beach Road The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 2511, as amended: • to permit a minimum 5.0 metre side yard width on the north side of the main building, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 7.5 metres The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct a 1,825 square metre addition to the existing industrial building. Principal Planner— Development Review outlined comments received from the City of Pickering City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from the City's Development Control Manager expressing no concerns. Marina Vrzalkovski, agent, and Bob Moore, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 45/13 by Eco-Tec Limited, be Approved on the grounds that the minimum 5.0 metre side yard width on the north side of the main building is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the proposed addition as generally sited on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by September 25, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void. Carried Unanimously Page 2 of 3 Chit o, A Committee of Adjustment r Meeting Minutes Y-.' Wednesday, September 25, 2013 f 3 1� _ 161 7:00 pm Main Committee Room (IV) Adjournment Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Shirley Van Steen That the 12th meeting of the 2013 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 7:05 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, October 16, 2013. Carried Unanimously Date Chair Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Page 3 of 3 Cat/VI 3 Report to _ Committee of Adjustment PICI�ERIN Application Number: P/CA 46/13 Meeting Date: October 16, 2013 From: Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 46/13 Emix Ltd. 1101 Kingston Road Application The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 6777/07: • to permit a minimum setback of 5.0 metres from the north lot line; whereas the by-law requires any buildings and structures to comply with the minimum setbacks as shown on Schedule Ito By-law 6777/07, which requires a minimum setback of 10.0 metres from the north lot line • to permit a minimum of 18% of the length of the build-to-zone to be occupied by a building; whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 50% of the length of the build-to-zone to be occupied by a building The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain site plan approval for a new commercial building. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the minimum setback of 5.0 metres from the north lot line and the minimum of 18% of the length of the build-to-zone to be occupied by a building to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed commercial building, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain Site Plan Approval for the proposed development by October 16, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed development by October 16, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void. Report P/CA 46/13 October 16, 2013 Page 2 5 Background In 2006, a Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 08/06 was approved for the subject lands to permit a broader list of commercial uses. Through this application staff recommended to revise the Town Centre West Development Guidelines (TCWDG) to delete the requirement for an east-west public street along the north end of the subject property, and replace it with a private drive-aisle Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan — Mixed Use Areas -- Mixed Use Corridors within the Town Centre Neigbhourhood Zoning By-law 3036 — "MU-22" — Mixed Use Zone Appropriateness of the Application Building Setback and Build-to-Zone Variance • the requested variances should be considered as a whole as all variances are required for the proposed development • the building setback and build-to-zone are intended to provide an appropriate and functional setback for development and to ensure an attractive streetscape and strong building presence along public roadways • with the change in road network from a public street to a private drive aisle the required building massing is no longer as relevant at the northeast corner of the site, as the road network functions internal to a private commercial development • the proposed single storey commercial building will provide a minimum building setback of 5.0 metres from the north lot line along a private internal road • the proposed setback for the proposed development from the required build-to-zone along the east side of the property is acceptable as it maintains a similar setback to the commercial building to the south, within the same lot • the single storey commercial development will replace an existing pergola, currently located within the "build-to-zone", and will provide a stronger building presence on the corner of the internal street, encourage connectivity and cohesiveness between the other commercial buildings on the subject site and on the adjacent commercial properties • the applicant has submitted a site plan application, which has been reviewed by staff and Site Plan Committee • Staff are generally satisfied with the siting of the building, parking and the location of the drive aisle • the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the subject lands and is in keeping with the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law G Report P/CA 46/13 October 16, 2013 Page 3 Date of report: October 10, 2013 Comments prepared by: ie -444/17041k. Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP 1ilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Manager, Development Review & Urban Design MM:Id J.\Dacumanls1Developmenl0-7 70 012 0 I 3IPCA 46-131RepanlPCA 48.13 docx Enclosures 0? �� o CULR AVENUE btfj:jJP! == =a—ft" III111111[111�Mir._ __ 1111 tM OSS 0 1` tN CRESCENT o IIIIIIIIII1111r►� (/111 — X111111111.•I/IIIIIrIIiiiIIIIII 1111 ► ORT II -lIi11111111111 — I!!!!!s r �� �sa--mium �� = g am z■■;_� MEADOW�,� 3 O p U.Q iEI iii�J 4 �, ? °P=-a, 0.L=■.cc• . i U— CRES. 1=m =011111 �. o mi- MI T-.T.il wilw,, o\-cY\uj • ! ♦Pr UNBARTO r`�������A • •• •y■ SUBJECT o ••••••••4 PROPERTY *- STE le%IIII -- N. "*--1.1''. 0 ,..: . III( w*OSR N = . S�RE�T �o� 0,��_Q= IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII BpNYLY .r ifik „ _,._: wAL, E R ,N R R. L : TR = YSHO- 0 TOT LOT P a,-1 Cry o� Location Map FILE No:PICA 46/13 7.tre APPLICANT: Emix Limited 1 4 1I L PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 1101 Kingston Road(Con. 1. Pt Lot 24, City Development 40R-12678, Part 6-9) DATE:Sept.4,2013 Department 8 DO[O $OUre SCALE /�/� TeranEt Enteroplrlses Inc. and It• suppliers. NI right. Reserved. Not o plop or survey. SCALE 1:5,000 PN-4 701 4PAC d ate suppliers. All rights ResenNd. Not a plan o/ Survey. • 118 • To permit a minimum 5.0 metre setback from the north 1 ■r lot line-13 0111111b, or !Aro To permit a minimum of 18 ■ percent of the length of the _ a ■ _'1 build-to-zone shall be m „„„.1 occupied by a building O �•` EXISTING HOME DEPOT EXISTING >,! 3 STOREY BUILDING EXISTING 3 STOREY tt BUILDING �,.>♦-*** GNP BUILD TO ZONE Submitted Plan _ 01 FILE No:P/CA 46/13 - APPLICANT: Emix Limited Pre Ci���i\ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 1101 Kingston Road(Con. 1. Pt Lot 24, City Development 40R-12678, Part 6-9) Department FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE:Sept 25,2013 09 , t� t_—� — 1■:1 SIGN � ••SIGN , — SIG�1 , SIGN [- -- r —1 r-' , - - o 1 /4 0 0 P o 1 741 I I I I I • I I I SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION ■ I 1+-- LJ LI --I, LJ- 1 FL T _ LI -L -1—Ls.1-- -- 'I SIGN , SIGN , ,SIGN I SIGN , SIGN , SIGN ; SIGN SIGN , I� _ 1 - 0 _ 1--r. i�� I : , , �� T 1 .i 1 WEST ELEVATION rfrtfT t � --1� , -' L.-..c-- ,` 1 SIGN SIGN , SIGN , SIGN , SIGN , SIGN, , SIGN , SIGN ,L_I 0 ,, 1. _ . 77.7jr. , DI- i� I / - --rL#---- 1 ::,lic! ,,, .,_.i_ , ,, , , , _ . /,4,14 EAST ELEVATION FILE No:P/CA 46/13 Caq'i APPLICANT: Emix Limited r � �. ;,u� • ��'- -- PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 1101 Kingston Road(Con. 1. Pt Lot 24, N U N I,1 40R-12678, Part 6-9) City Development — Department — -- - DATE: Sept 25,2013 c_';r,f Report to 10 Committee of Adjustment PICKERI Application Number: P/CA 48/13 Meeting Date: October 16, 2013 From: Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 48/13 M. & M. Weatherbee 1425 Finch Avenue Application The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 3036, as amended: • to permit an unenclosed covered porch and uncovered steps to project a maximum of 2.0 metres into the required front yard; whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into any required front or rear yard • to permit a maximum lot coverage of 16 percent; whereas the by-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 10 percent The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct an unenclosed covered porch and uncovered steps in the front yard. The applicant also seeks relief from the maximum lot coverage for the proposed unenclosed covered porch and existing detached garage. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the projection of an unenclosed covered porch and uncovered steps to a maximum of 2.0 metres into the required front yard and a maximum lot coverage of 16 percent to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed unenclosed covered porch and uncovered steps attached to the main building and the existing detached garage, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by October 16, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void. Report P/CA 48/13 October 16, 2013 Page 211 Background Minor Variance applications P/CA 62/69 and P/CA 25/72 were previously approved for the subject property to recognize an existing non-conforming lot area, lot frontage, floor area of an existing dwelling and to permit an existing detached garage to remain where located in the side yard. Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan - Urban Residential -- Medium Density Areas within the Liverpool Neighbourhood Zoning By-law 3036 — "A" — Agricultural Zone Appropriateness of the Application Uncovered Steps and Platforms Projecting into the Front Yard • the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front or rear yard • the intent of this provision is to ensure an adequate landscaped area within the front yard is maintained • the proposed unenclosed covered porch and steps will not obstruct the streetview of abutting property owners and will maintain an adequate landscaped area within the front yard • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the subject lands and is in keeping with the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law Increase in Lot Coverage • the intent of the maximum lot coverage provision is to maintain an appropriate amount of outdoor amenity area uncovered by buildings on a lot, and to regulate the scale and size of the buildings • the increase in lot coverage to 16 percent is to allow for the proposed covered porch and to bring the existing detached garage into conformity with the zoning by-law • due to the existing non-conforming lot area, the lot is smaller than what is required by the zoning by-law • the increase in lot coverage will not alter the character of the subject property or the surrounding neighbourhood • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the subject lands and is in keeping with the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Report P/CA 48/13 October 16, 2013 12 Page 3 Date of report: October 9, 2013 Comments prepared by: (4/411041k_ Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Ni esh Surti, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Manager, Development Review & Urban Design MM:Id J lDocuments Development D-3700'20131PCA 4-13\ReporlVPCA 4603.ducz Enclosures • _ 1. 3 O FOR GLEN TOT LOT - Or o I o— w PATH o / cc 1 o�� m=,j w c/Nw � � I� � 111110 1. 111111/ I 1 STREET ERNCLIFF ` \ _� r �� w d �� 0-v O�� / Q \__f—E—E—i= =111111111111111 I 4 . RT V________________ CIRCLE w PARK DALE STREET i 1=" it,FINCH AVENUE F MIII/ �SOIIAE LODGE - -� X1111 o 1 , \ EVERTON STREET R0__ �./1 C o= �� -- ,111111111 1111111 0� !i = 111 — J s o 0 , LANE �� _ w I _ O d, II - ---- O cc N SQUARE } n lI R _-- 1'111111 `W0P 'LDLIGHT o BOULEVARD 0 B1111101111," [7 r CRESCENT I ��i` 0� ROSEFIELD ROAD IIIIffiliII 1 M GLENGROVE GLENGROI/E _ _ a _ h PUBL/C > MN SCHOOL MN �� PARK ROAD / 111./ w —w �� R°P) — :I1 II IIIIII 1111w „ ____________ 0 rBRANDS COURT o f /4--‘C S� /�Imo City o� Location Map FILE No:P/CA 48/13 „i �. ----. APPLICANT: M. & M. Weatherbee • 1111"c PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 1425 Finch Avenue(Con. 1. N. Pt Lot 21) City Development - DATE:Sept.17,2013 Department onto so�ra•r 7 207 t PAC•rapnd• nu.p plo•.t•A l•rpl R.•A•rvri•ga R rpvioon. N t Soo,opy n °""-” SCALE 1:5,000 PN-12 14 FINCH AVENUE 30.4. • i • FUTURE ROAD • WIDENING mi 6 ! E 30,4 0 a To permit a maximum v lot coverage of 16 u percent E N ��lrff d gi s+:4mA E7 g 172 \ \ .1 5.1 To permit an unenclosed `, \` h and \� \` covered porc a U.t s1anET IME NG uncovered steps to project y 1 \\, a maximum of 2.0 metres I \ `\ \i into the required front yard \\ � , .\ EX BMX G•PAGE \ el i_ J 7.1 _ -I I.9 u 1 m 0 r 30.4 .1 N FILE No:P/CA 48/13 Cifq'i APPLICANT M. & M. Weatherbee ''' ' .?14";_ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 1425 Finch Avenue(Con. 1. N. Pt Lot 21) . ill 41.11A U City Development Department DATE:Sept.25,2013 • 5 {�IIIIII� =- I II _. _ III" . 1111111111111 ill I II In11l,1 Lr V * ; i ! i;VV • "•.;— ,'*V. * % sy , i� i�.► hannwo MN= I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I FRONT(NORTH) ELEVATION 4' •rr■ _ 411111. ar i a..l • l h 1,00 L J SIDE(EAST) ELEVATION FILE No:P/CA 48/13 City APPLICANT: M. & M. Weatherbee ,•,_ � ;;.-,fit_ .� PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 1425 Finch Avenue(Con. 1. N. Pt Lot 21) 3:111►C City Development Department DATE:Sept.25,2013 Cu,/no Report to ':_C Committee of Adjustment ICI KERINC Application Number: P/CA 49/13 Meeting Date: October 16, 2013 From: Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 49/13 D. Hansen & C. MacMillian 717 Breezy Drive Application The applicant requests relief from the following provisions of Zoning By-law 2520, as amended: • to permit a minimum front yard depth of 5.0 metres along Essa Crescent; whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard depth of 7.5 metres along Essa Crescent • to permit an unenclosed covered porch to project a maximum of 2.0 metres into the required front yard along Breezy Drive; whereas the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into any required front yard, and • to permit a minimum rear yard depth of 6.0 metres; whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit to construct an unenclosed covered porch along Breezy Drive, a two storey addition along Essa Crescent, and a two storey addition in the rear yard. Recommendation The City Development Department considers the minimum 5.0 metre front yard depth along Essa Crescent, the encroachment of an unenclosed covered porch to project a maximum of 2.0 metres into the required front yard along Breezy Drive and the minimum 6.0 metre rear yard depth to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed development, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans. 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by October 16, 2015, or this decision shall become null and void. Report P/CA 49/13 October 16, 2013 17 Page 2 Comment Official Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan - Urban Residential — Low Density Areas within the West Shore Neigbhourhood Zoning By-law 2520-- "R4" — Fourth Density Residential Zone Appropriateness of the Application Front Yard Depth for Proposed Two Storey Addition (along Essa Crescent) • the intent of this provision is to provide an adequate separation distance between the building and the street activity in the front yard, and to provide an adequate landscaped area and parking space in front of the property • the existing lot is a flankage lot, which the by-law deems to have two front yards, one fronting Essa Crescent and the other fronting Breezy Drive • the front yard along Essa Crescent does not contain the parking area of the property, the existing driveway access is from Breezy Drive, which will remain unchanged • the proposed two storey addition will maintain an adequate landscaped area along Essa Crescent • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the subject lands and is in keeping with the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Encroachment of Covered Porch into the Required Front Yard (along Breezy Drive) • the by-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required front or rear yard • the intent of this provision is to ensure an adequate landscaped area within the front yard is maintained • the proposed unenclosed, covered porch encroaching 2.0 metres into the front yard along Breezy Drive will not obstruct the streetview of abutting property owners, as this is a flankage lot, and will maintain an adequate landscaped area within the front yard • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the subject lands and is in keeping with the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Rear Yard Depth for Proposed Two Storey Addition • the intent of the minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres is to ensure that an appropriate amenity space is provided in the rear yard Report P/CA 49/13 October 16, 2013 Page 3 • the proposed two storey addition within the rear yard of the property will maintain a rear yard depth of 6.0 metres, which is an adequate amenity area within the rear yard of the property • the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the subject lands and is in keeping with the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Date of report: October 10, 2013 Comments prepared by: /0 fek:MCV(A- Melissa Markham, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Manager, Development Review &At 1 Urban Design MM:Id Nil- h Surti, MCIP, RPP J) ocumenlS1DeveloMent\D-3700 Committee 01 Alostment(PCA ApplI MWns)12013'PCA 41.11 lknms Hamm A.Card MncM,Ilanllicpon\1QA 49-I1.Aa= Enclosures 19 -- ...- WES SHO-• / COMM r, SIRE° CCNTR DP\ � � gAY� %•114.__________ Vil � 01/ 11 VISTUL.11r,/ lis_1��r► ESG _ liJP! rr� i�� DRIVE cR 1 d_ ■ DR mil t ors ■ - , - =v� ��������rr . •— ��, GARDENS . ROA Iii - i— TIINS - '`iIIIIIIIIll� CECYLIA a ���_��� .uuuI,ij 11111►LE /1111111/ 1 1 To���Ir 1.* jfu.L LYNX AVENUE r,,,,, DRI••�``'' I -N ,,, 111#,- 1 SAMFORD ,, =1�I� GLEN ,l�11 u LANE BAYSHORE AV/NE J _ CRT ' , PARK AVENUE i�II ��� 1111 11110 =1 111, I�j lii IIIIl111 �I r 1 11111TA AVENUE o o}='' . ; u2, BRUCE 11 111 m— ,,, .'�t�,' _ SCOMBE u11I111 I.t► U .ANOK � ' i �� At Milk 1111111111111 p eR'- ).- 1 N MEMORIA 11111 _ — PARK VICKI DRIVE = FRENCHMAN'S -w�`- I1 BAY w NM w Li) SUB ( T FRENCHMAN'S IN o o - ■ _ ' PRO/ , e TM BAY . ME MN PUBLIC SCHOOL = 5 —o OKLAHOMA u i. Y Tc 1 . .111 } _�=N IIE AY� 1 7 MI >- _ _ _ _ w M w -7\ , Y) — N -P-- r_ - U) H f ( Cifq Location Map off FILE No:P/CA 49/13 a��!;- .- APPLICANT: D. Hansen &C. MacMillan a�r� �,i� PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 717 Breezy Drive (Plan M18 Lot 577) City Development Department DATE:Sept.25,2013 oela sear - C t ev...e 1:5,000 T.ranel Cnt.tad it Ine. 21 I[. .ugh.n. .. r.d. 7."Al, No[ a plan at Y. SCALE 1:5,00 PN-2 8]013 4PAC and i!. .upplien. All nah<e Resarvatl. Not o pion of Survey. 20 1 1 To permit a minimum 5.0 metre front yard setback to the main wall of the To permit a minimum -1. •-• •. .•- 6.0 metre rear yard setback to the main wall of the dwelling . -- 5.24n, _ x 18.14m } __61Dm i I I PROPOSED I PROPOSED PROPOSED '! I- 2.44n REQUIRED SOACK -I 1 1 - %' ://. / I NEW 2 EXISTING / /NEW/ 1 I i ADDI7IOI: DWELLING 4 GARAGE I/AJJITI�JN. !V. -.t !-./ i y- -�_ • 1 e ,/„,/,,,,, �/`v ,1,-) ..} c / / .s I— i 1 a / 4 v ,1/,' i: I i //,'-ii:,,:. l,, w/ I 'r, j Z E f E I /��' ,� 1 w i a 7.50n REOUIR€D SE TRACK -/-Ia/ �_-- -------_- -_-, U j air I /iir`�/_� I 1 i V EW PORCt1f�� W I jI. 2� j1-3.68m Cf U I I I "/ ! ! �_/_ //1 — I 1 N E1N 6 OpOSE --8'PROPOSED -. w I I 1 (ASPYIALTJ ASP ALT I REGISTERED PLAN M 18 t g U) 1 D L VEWAY aR1 SWAY 1 LOT 577 <a W 1 .I PIN 575-577-578-579 • �------------_I_:_ -�-- 1--•---------- .-- -- 30 45 m - -, BREEZY DRIVE To permit an unenclosed covered porch to project a maximum of 2.0 metres int• the required front yard 1\ • N FILE No:P/CA 49/13 Cdq APPLICANT: D. Hansen & C. MacMillan _,l_i'i1�;--- - '• � a _PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 717 Breezy Drive (Plan M18, Lot 577) it-WI City Development Department -- — - - -- - DATE:Sept.29,2013 l 11 1 11111111111 1111111111111 u 1 ■M l . ln� .r.ma•ins�.ri+lr.lr - ..m�lrs�r�rrr 1 rI - _— .5- -- - ---- .-° _ In s _ _ _ 1 - = h 1::::::111/11111..„..�i— 1:11.1 i - 111-'_ � — L I .f - -;- 11 -- namm innnIil mm iegmmn�umnam.It I 1 ,I u, 111111 : � ' � . ,amens in I I. im� l i � -4 ■ I --'_ eIIU I11; m I . - - _ Y i = �iQIQQ[QCiQ ; �1 D mi ° - i -—';Qi a I D t I Q z~ Li n I FRONT(SOUTH) ELEVATION I _��� aJ Tl� 1 1 m11101irnIl1 @MI I�Y�nlltlqu IamummmummnnnI nil mu I; Jill!agmlams��ll®nlla��i. _ Emon mnn.Qmtli0mummy)iimu mlltllllnlmlliINltl- •-"'� w— '-` _ . c-.._.__..-__.-�_ - _--�— _Ez_T—�_ . - . _I E .. __ rc- �—... z • --�r • 9 L—_ --__r te - i-- __ _ _ em SIDE(EAST) ELEVATION SIDE(WEST) ELEVATION ...7\ N FILE No:P/CA 49/13 ' ., - APPLICANT: D. Hansen & C. MacMillan �.I. II.J.:-.7.,.,- PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 717 Breezy Drive (Plan M18, Lot 577) .� ZY City Development — - Department IDATE:Sept.29,2013