HomeMy WebLinkAboutJuly 25, 2012�t�mm��tee af Adjustment
Agenda
Meeting Number: 9
Date: Wednesday, July 25, 2012
. .
,..�,,,.. .
� �;=.x.,—�i�����::-;,__
�... . .
x • s�,—���� "'�:��ra� 4
���`
Committee of Adjus#ment
Agenda
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
7:dQ pm
Main Gommittee Room
Page Number
(I) Adaptio� of Agenda
(II} Adopt�on of Minutes from July 4, 2012 1_11
{III) Reports
1. Defer�ed ftom the July 4, 2012 mee#ing 12-17
PJCA 2�/12 – M. 8� L. Raponi
334 Fiddlers Court
tPart of Lot 18, Plan 228, Parts 1 and 2, Plan 40R-15374)
City of Pickering
2. Deferred from the Jufy 4, 2012 meeting 18-22
PlCA 35/12 – Winster Investments Limited
415 Toynevale Raad
{Part of Lots 64 to 66, Part 1, Plan 44R-19738}
City af Pickering
3. PICA 37112 – E_ Kerr & S. Parks
691 Front Raad
(Lot 51, Plan M90)
City of Pickering
4. PICA 38112 – H. Weber
962 Vistula Drive
{Lot 391, Plan M-17}
City of Pickering
23-29
�c��IIc�
�. PICA 39112 –'16854a4 Qntario Ltd_ 36-40
1023 Bfock Road
(Sauth Part of Lot 18, Concession 1, Part 2, 40R-1$713)
City of Pickering
6. P(CA 40112 – E. McKinnon 41-46
6fi8 �ront Road
(Part Lot 3, Plan 6� Black E, Part 2& 3, 40R-5378)
City af Pickering
Ac�essible s Far informatian related to accessibility requiremen#s pfease contact
P I� K E F� �J � �esley Dunne
� T. �Q5.42D.4664, extension 2024
TTY 905.420.1739
Emai{ Edunne@pick�ring.ca
{IV)
7. PICA 41112 — J. 8� L. Varga
717 Hillview Crescent
(Lot 96, Plan 331 }
City af Pickering
$. PICA 42/12 — 1473714 Qntaria Ltd.
875 Bayly Street
(Part of Block B, Plan M-2a, Part 1, 40R-587fi)
City of Pickering
9. P/CA 43112 — T. 8� H. Somwaru
628 Sunbird Trail
(Part Lot 69, Plan 40M-2208, Part 8, 4aR-23011)
City of Pickering
10. P/CA 44112 — C. 8� K. Coppolino
936 Redbird Crescent
(Block 226, Plan 40M-1325, Part of Block 63,
Plan 44M-1415, Parts 5, fi, 25, 26, 28, 40R-9899)
Cit}r of Pickering
1'E. P/CA 45/�2 — K. Selimovski
17�6 Woadview Avenue
(Lot 17, Plan 4QM 1fi92}
City of Pickering
Adjournment
Page Number
47-53
54-58
59-63
.� .:
;• .
Accesstble � Far information related to accessibility requirements please contact
Lesley Dunne
� � � K � ���j T. �a5.420.4860, extension 2�24
TTY 905.42Q.1739
Email Idunne�a pickering.ca
. , --:
.�,,.. _ .
,-^ ,''�,�,� �. ��-•:.� _
;,u. _ ,� . -::.:> _�
:,;��� _
, . �'�'n"-r_�;� �
�����_�.��_!��
Pending Adoption
Present:
Tom Capeland
David Johnson — Chair
�ric �Vewtor� -- V�ce-Chair
Bill Utton
S�irley Van Steen
Alsa Present:
Mila Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
�esley Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
t�)
{II}
Ado�tion of Agenda
Nloved �y Bill Uttan
Seconded by Shirley Van Steen
Committee of Adjustment
Mee#ing Minutes
Wednesday, July 4, 20'f2
7:�0 pm
NMain Committee Room
That the agenda for tfi�e Wednesday, July 4, 2012 meeting be adopted.
Carried Unanimously
Adaption of Minutes
Moved by Bill Utton
Seconded by Tom Cop�land
That the minu#es of the 7th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held
Weclnesday, June 13, 2a12 be adopted.
Carried
1
�� �.
. --
,,,.. �
_ 7����--
��.-i�a�.—�C�'..-`'!�-�'—,Y_: �;.1;==.c=.
A- , ,: ..�:
����1������
(J11} Reports
{Deferred from the June 13, 2012 mee#ing}
PICA 17112 — L. Sau�ders
8�7 Fairview Avenue
(Plan 814, Lot '! 9)
City of Pickering
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minu#es
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
7: QO pm
Main Commi#tee Room
The applicant requests relief irom Zoning By-law 2511 to permit an existing lot
frantage of 7.6 metres, an existing lot area of 295 square metres, a front yard
depth of 1.6 metres to a proposed attached garage, a north side yard width of
0.� metres, a south side yard wicfth of 0_9 metres, a propased lot coverage of
42 percent, a setback af 0.9 metres #o an existing accessory building, and an
existing tota� accessory building lot coverage of 6 percent to allaw for the
constructior� of the prapased 3 storey dwelfing that wi!! be built behind the
existing dwelling and converting the existing dwelling into an attached garage
whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage af 15.0 metres, a minimum
lot area of 460 square metres, a front yard depth of 7.5 metres, north side yard
width of 1.5 metres, south side yard af 2.4 metres, a maximum lot coverage of
33 pErcent, accessory building setback of 1.0 metres to all lot lines and
maximum lot coverage of � percent for all accessory buildings.
The appiicant requests approval of #hese variances in order #o obtain a building
permit for the construction of the prapased 3 storey dwelling and garage.
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the
City of Pickering Planning & Develapment Department recommending refusal to
the fror�t yard depth of 1.6 metres and recommends that the application be
amended ta request a front yard depth of 6.� metres to a proposed attached
�arage. The Plartrting & De�elopment Department recommended app�o�al for
the variances related to the proposed 3 storey dwelling, subject to conditions.
Written comments were afso received from the City's Develapment Control
Manager expressing na cancerns.
Leslie 8� Garry Saunders, owners, were present to represent the application. No
further representation was present in favour of ar in objection ta the application.
�eslie Saunders explained to the Committee since filing the �ariance application
the construction of the garage will have a front yard depth of 2.8 metres not
1.6 metres. In response to a quest�on from a Committee Member, Leslie &
Garry Saunders indicated they would not consider amending the appiication to
fi.a metres because it will affect the size of the backyard. Leslie Sau�ders
offic�aliy amended the application to have a front yard depth of 4.Q metres.
2
�� a� Cammittee of Adjustment
,;�, Meeting Minutes
+ � _ Wednesday, July 4, 2012
,;
7:OQ pm '�� �
Nfain Gommittee Room
Moved by Shiriey Van Steer�
Seconded by Bill Utton
That application P1CA 17112 by L. Saunders, be Refused on the grounds that
the front yard depth of 1.6 metres to an attached garage of a praposed 3 storey
dweiling is a major variance that is not desirable for the appropriate development
af the land, and not in keeping with the genera! intent and purpase of the Zoning
By-law.
�Tii:J
That appiicat�on PlCA 17I12 by L. Saunciers, be Approved on the grounds that
the exis#ing Eot frantage of 7.fi rrretres, existing Iot area of 295 square metres, an
amended frant yarct depth of 4.� metres, north side yard width of Q.5 metres,
south side yarcf width af 0_9 metres, accessory buifding setback of 0.9 metres,
accessory bu�lding lot coverage of 6 percent and a lot coverage of 42 percent to
be minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate developrr�ent of the
land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and
the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditFOns:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed detached dwelling, as
generally sited and outlined on the appiicant's submitted plans subject to the
revised frorrt yard depth.
2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the �roposed cons#ruction by
July 4, 2414, or this decisian shall become null and void.
Carried Unanimausly
2. P/CA 2�1'12 — M. 8� L_ Raponi
334 Fiddlers Court
{Part of Lot 18, Plan 228, Parts 'f & 2, Plan 40R-15374)
City of Pickering
�he applicant requests relief from Zoning By-iaw 3036 to recogn�ze a north side
yard width and an east rear yard depth of 0.6 metres to an existing shed and to
permit a south side yard width and an east rear yard depth of 0.4 metres to a
newly constructed shed, whereas the by-faw requires a min�mum 1.0 metres
setback to all lot lines for aFl accessory structures.
The applicant requests approval of this �ariance in order to obtain zoning
campl�ance.
3
. -
.�.,,..� _ , ..
-_-��—
���-
;,w _ _ �,;i:;� �- : .
- t-=i�
�-.,�,� � ::s- �-�::. _--._.
.���_�/������ -�
Committee af Adjustment
Meeting IVlinutes
Wednesday, July 4, 2�'! 2
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlir�ed comments received from the
City of Pickering P�anning & Development Departrnent recommending refusal to
the sauth side yard width and an east rear yard depth to a newly constructed
shed. The Planning & Development Department recammended approval for the
variances re�ated to the narth side yard width and an east rear yard depth to an
existing st�ed subject to canditions. Wr�tten comments were received from the
City's Qevelopment Control Manager in�icating alf drainage from the structure
must be cantained on the subject property. Written cornments were received
from Ma�ia Graefe af 1408 Rougemount Drive in abjection ta the application.
Maria Rapar�i, owner, was present ta represent the application. Josiv Ste�anovski
of 33fi Fiddlers Court and Maria Graefe of 1408 Rougemount Dri�e were present
in objectian to the application.
Mario Ra�oni advised tl�e Committee he would like to defer the appiication to
allow time to abtain information from the Planning Department and submit
additEOnal information on the application for it to be recor�sidered.
Josiv Stevanovski pravided pictures for the Committee Members to review, and
indicated the shed is too close ta the property line for proper maintenance.
Maria Graefe indicated concerns with the height and locatian of the shed. Maria
Graefe aiso provided pictures for the Committee Members ta re�iew and they
show how close the newly constructed shed is to the fence.
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Bill Utton
That application P/CA 29112 by M. 8� L. Rapani, be Deferred to allow the
applicant time to review and submit additional information for the application.
Carried Unanimously
3_ P1CA 30112 — K. & P. Locke
1321 Commerce Street
(Lot 14, Plan 407}
Ci#y of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511 to permit a rear yard
depth of 3_8 metres to a proposed rear deck exter�sion, whereas the by-law
requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres.
0
�t�tt o¢� Committee of Adjustmen#
,�;, Meeting Minutes
" � � � Wednesday, July 4, 2412
7:00 pm � E �
Main Committee Roam
The a�piicant requests approval of this variance in order to abtain zoning
compliance.
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outfined comments recei�ed from the
City of Pickering PlanRing � Development Department recommending appro�al
subject to conditians. Written camments were alsa received from the City's
Develo}�ment Controf Manager expressing na concerns.
Peter Lacice, owner, w�s present to represent the application. No further
representation was present in favour of ar in objection to the application.
Maved by Tom Capeland
Seconded by Eric Newton
That application PlCA 30112 by K. & P. Locke, be Approved on the grounds that
the proposed rear yard clepth of 3.8 metres to a rear deck extension is a minor
variance that is desirable #or the appropriate deveiapment of the land, and in
keeping with the genera) inten# and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning
By-law, subject to the foflowing condit�on:
1. That this variance apply only to the proposed rear deck extension, as
generally sited and outlined on the appficant's submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain a building perrnit for the proposed rear deck
extensian by July 4, 20'14, or this decisian shal! become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
4. P1CA 311'32 to 33/12 — Pickering Shores Devefopment Inc.
�50, �60 8� 576 Gillmoss Road
(Lots 9, �2, 20, Plan 44M-2469)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief fram Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law
70$2110 to permit:
P1CA 31112 an east side yard width of 0.6 metres to a proposed two-storey
detached dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of
1.2 metres.
2. P1CA 32112 a north side yard width of 0.6 metres to a proposed two-storey
detached dweiling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of
1.2 metres.
5
�� �� Committee of Adjustmen#
,�, Meeting Minu#es
`�` f.� "_� E Wednesday, J�ly 4, 2012
7:00 pm
Main Cammittee Room
3. P1CA 33112 a south side yard width of 4.6 metres to a proposed #wo-starey
detached dwe�ling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of
� .2 metres.
The ap�licant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain building
permits for each lot.
M. Yeung, Assistar�t Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the
City of Pickering Planni�g & Deve�opment Department recommending refusal.
Written comments were rece�ved from the Ci#y's Developmen# Control Manager
expressing no concerns with P/CA 31/12 and P/CA 33/12. Vllritten comments
were aRso received for P/CA 32112 indicating #he lot ta the narth (Lot 13) has
beet� approved with a 0.6 metre setback to a shared property line and ha�e
concerns with the drainage between the houses.
Dominic Mabilio, agent, was present to represent the application. in further
representatian was present in favour of or in objection ta the application.
Dominic Mobilia of Hunt Design explained the application and pro�ided a
detailed site plan far the Committee Members to review and consider. Dominic
Mobilia expfainec! ta the Committee that the way this by-law was written, lats with
lot frontages of 12.0 metres or more req�Ere larger side yard standards than
those lots with lat fronfages less than 12.0 metres. The 3 lots requesting s�de
yard variances are flankage lats and the builder ir�tentionally made #Me lot
frontages larger in order to compfy with the by-!aw requirement of flankage side
yard. However, ance the lot frontages were larger #o accommodate flankage
side yard width, the lat fron#ages of the flankage lots became 12.0 metres or
more which then must comply with larger side yard standards. Therefore, the
by-law limits the builder from buildirtg the same size home an larger lots than
those allowed on smafler lots. Daminic Mobilio aiso explained that the builder
on(y wishes to build the same size home as he can on a smaller lot with lot
frantages tess than � 2.0 metres.
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Bifl Utton
That applicatians PICA 31/12 to PICA 33/12 by Pickering Sh�res De�elopment
Inc., be Approved on the grounds that the side yard widths of 0.6 metres for
three proposed two-storey detached dweflings on three separate lots are minor
var�ances that are desirable for the appropriate de�elopment of the land, and in
keepin� with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law, subject to the
following cor�ditions:
[:�
.. ��
_ �., _ — ��: �
�= �� �- �..::i:: _:-
�•- ,a -i�•- - .-_� • _-.
. �:,:.� � :.
_ Z _ _ ��:�— <.!���aa.3��.
..� �� ._�.�� ��� .�
Committee of Adjustment
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, July 4, 2072
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
�. That these variances apply only #o #he praposed two-starey detached
dwellings on three separate lots, as geflerally sited and outlined on the
appl�canYs subrnitted �lans.
2. That the app�icant obtain building permits for the proposed construction by
.fuly 4, 2014 ar this decision shaA become null and void_
Carried
Vo#e
Tam Copeland in favour
David JoF�nson in favour
Eric Newtan opposed
Bill Uttan in favour
Shirley Van Steen in fa�our
5. P/CR 35112 – Wintser Investments Limited
415 Toynevaie Raad
(Part of Lots 64 to 66, Part 1, Plan 40R-19738)
City of Pickering
The applicant requests reiief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law
1399181 to permit a maximum of 73 children in a Day Nursery facRlity for the
daytime care of children and a tota! of 3Q0 children and students enrolled in
either a day nursery or a private non-resideniial school at any one time, whereas
the by-law permits a day nursery facility for the daytime care af not more than
4fl children at any one time and a maxirnum total of 150 children and students
enrolled in either a day nursery or a private non-residential school at any one time.
T�te applicant requests approval of this �ariance in order to obtain zoning
compiiance to receive site plan approvaf.
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outiined comments received from the
City of Pickering Planning & Develapment Department recommending approval
subject to conditions. Wr'�tten comments were received from the City's Development
Controi Manager expressing no concerns. Written camments were also received
from lan McFarland af 380 Toynevale Raad, Pave! 8� Irina Muresan af 401 Frontier
Court and Carole King af 372 Toynevale Road in objectian to #he appiication.
7
�� �
. --
�,,,... _ _. � :
�' aii s��iC � ef ��;:1; �s-
.��. •
.
,
� i?�=ti--- , :� . "
;� � 7�+.T :S_S_ a7Ta7:I : :....::.....::�
, . —. '.': �_ .u� �3; w
�..��.��..���.��� �
Committee of Adjustment
Mee#ing Minutes
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
7:00 pm
IVlain Cormmittee Room
Heather Wilson & Lawrence Wlson, owners, were present to represent the
application. Dave Page vf 574 Oakwood Qri�e, �isa Black-Meddings of
382 Toynevale Road, Ca#herine Coghlan of �33 Toynevale Road, Michae!
Barber of 374 Toynevale Road, Carole King of 372 Tvynevale Raad, Alex
Tsoulis of 543 Toynevale Road, Teresa Bunting of 543 l�ekani Court, Marie
Robinson of 414 ToynevaRe Road, Heather Wlkinson-Little af 410 Toynevafe
Road and John McFarland of 380 Toynevale Road were present in objection #o
the applicatian.
Correspondenee receivecf from Pavel & Irina Muresan indicated concerns with
increased risk af accidents, noise, sewage, residential access and the capacity,
safety and hygienic condi#ions of the existing buildFng.
Heather Wifsan expfained the appiicatEOn and the current number of children
enrolled into the schooi. In response to a question from a Committee Member,
Hea#her WiJson indica#ed she has no problem holding a Community Meeting with
area residents to listen and try ta address their concerns.
Dave Page indfcated concerns with traffic and safety along Toynevale Road
especiafly in the winter and requested clarification an the �ariance application.
Lisa Black-Meddings indicated cancerns with traffic, saf�ty of children at the bus
stop, and drivers not stopping a# the stop sign. Lisa Black-Meddings requested
clar�fication on the variance appfication.
Catherine Caghlan indicated cancerns with traffic, already over maximum
children allowed, increased noise, and not enough paricing.
Michael Barber indicated to Committee Members Region of Durham has been
cantacted frequently regarding existing traffic concerns.
Carole King indicated cancerns with unplowed sidewalks an many accasions in
the winter and Sunday soccer games during the summer, the steady flow of
erratic d�ivers dro�ping off and picking up children and not being able to exit #heir
driveway in the marnings befare S am ar in the afternoon around 4pm.
Alex Tsoulis indicated concerns with the Montessori site being very cramped
especially in the southwest corner, no crosswalk or proper sidewalks exists and
entrances are too close to residential uses unEike standards established in public
schooi sRtes_
�
�� a� Committee of Adjustment
,�, Meeting Minutes
_ "� � � Wednesday, July 4, 2012
7:00 pm `r �
Nlain Committee Room
Teresa 6unting indicated concerns with the Mantessori School ha�ing beert in
non-compliance for faur years now, and would like a comple#e traffic s#udy on
the increased #raffc and the effect the increase would have an the surrounding
neighbourhoad. Teresa Bunting noted the Montessori Schoof had a company
trim the trees surrounding the sublect property and they cut two of her mature
trees to six foat stumps and these trees hefped screen the view of the schooi
gym from the back deck and will be costly #a have these trees rernoved.
Marie Robinson indicated concerns with traffic and it takes up to 5-10 minutes
just to exit her own driveway. Marie Robinsan tried to speak with Heather Wlson
suggesting a newslette� be handed aut to parents af the Mantessori School
asicing to be cou�teous to surrounding neighbours of the Montessori School and
obey the rules ot the road.
Heather V1tEkinson-Little indicated concerns with traffic, safety of children, noise
and when the school �as a speciaf event parking spills out onto the roadway
because there is not enough parking on-site.
Jo#�n McFarland indicated concerns v,rith the continuous stream of traffic to and
frorn the Montessori School which causes a major problem leaving their own
driveways.
MOVed by'iOM, ERIC, BILL, SHIRLEY
Seconded by TOM, ERIC, BILL, SHIRLEY
That applica#ion PICA 35112 by Wintser Investments Limited, be Deferred to
all�w the applicant time ta consult with the communi#y.
Carried Unanimously
8. PICA 36l12 —.i. � G. Breen
4993 Brock Road
{Part of Lot 3, Plan 12, Part 1, Plan 40R-5734}
City of Pickering
The applicant requests relief from Zaning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law
6644/06 to permit the enlargement and extension af a iegal non-conforming
detached dweflfng by permitting an accessory dwelling unrt in an accessory building,
and to permit a 0.0 metre south side yard width to an existing accessory building,
whereas the by-law does not perrnit buildings used for residentia� purposes as a
�rincipal use on a property zaned for commercial purposes and requires a
1.0 metre side yard width for a!1 accessory structures within a commercial zone.
�7
Cir� Q¢� Committee of Adjustment
� : �� ,.�, Meeting Minutes
�� Wed nesday, J u iy 4, 2012
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order ta obtain zoning
compJiance.
M. Yeung, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the
City of Picker�ng Planning 8� Development Department recommending approva!
subject to canditians. Written comments were received frorrz the City's
Development Control Manage� expressing no concerns. Written comments were
also received from Shelagh 8� Ken Mulveney of 4951 Brock Road nofing the
application is acceptable with canditions.
John 8� Gordana Breen, owners, were present to represent the applica#ion. Ron
Hedges of 1767 Track Street was present in objection to the application.
John & Gardana Breen provided a history of the property and the previously
approved Committee of Adjustment application in 2410. Gordana Breen
indicated Fire Services has no fire safety concerns regarding the accessory
building which wiii address cor�dition #3 of staff recommendations. John 8�
Gordana Breen indicated they have spoken with the neighbour ta the sou#h
regarding the encroachment agreement.
Ron Hedges quest�oned whe� the barn on the subject property was canverted to
a coach house. Ron Hedges indicated he did not receive a copy of #he notice.
Ron Hedges also questioned why his name was not indicated on the
encraachmsnt agreement as he is also listed an the p�operty as a registered
awner.
Moved by Shirley Van Steen
Seconded by Bil� Uttan
Tt�at appi�cation P/CA 36112 by J. � G. Breen, be Approved on the grounds that
the enlargement and extens+on of a legal non-conforming detached dwelling by
permftting an accessory dwelling unit in an accessary building and a 0.0 metre
south side yard width to an exfsting accessory building to be minor variances that
are desirable for the apprapriate development of the land, and in keeping with
the general intent and purpose af the Qfficial Plan and the Zoning By-Eaw,
subject to the follawing conditions:
1_ That these variances apply to the finro existing building, as sited and outfined
on #he applicant's subrnitted plans with this applica#ion.
10
CX� a¢� Comm�ttee of Adjustment
,. , Meeting Minutes
"� �� _ Wed nesday, J u!y 4, 2012
7:�0 pm -: �
Main Committee Room � `
2. That the applicants enter into an encroachrnent agreement with the owner of
the abutting south property {4989 Brack Raad) by January 4, 2014 or the
decision regarding the accessory building shall become nuli and vaid,
3. That the applicants provide confirmation to the Planning 8� Development
Department that a fire inspection was conducted through the Fire Services
Division, #o the satisfaction of the City by January 4, 2Q'! 3, or the decision
regarcfing tl�e accessory building shal! become null and void.
Carried Unanimously
{IV} Ad"ournment
Nloved by Bi!! Uttan
Seconded by Er�c Newton
That the 8th meeting of the 2012 Cort�mittee of Adjustment be acfjourned at
8:43 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on
Wednesday, July 25, 2012.
Carried Unanimousfy
Date
Cttair
Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
11
.�,,.._
_— —�fE'��� _ —
,�,_�,=,,.�,�i,�.: � ,,.—.�
— ,.� ,:.s_�.::,�, � �w�:l.
���ii��
.�. �
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number: PlCA 29112
Meeting Date: July 25, 2012
(Deferred from July 4, 2Q12 meeting}
From: Ross Pym, MCiP, RPP
Pri�cipa] Planner — Development Review
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 29112
M. & L. Raponi
334 Fiddlers Court
tPart of Lat 18, Plan 228, Parts 1 8� 2, Plan 40R-15374)
City of Pickering
Apptication:
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3�36 to recagnize a north side yard
width and an east rear yard depth of �.6 metres to an existing shed and to permit a
south side yard width and an east rear yard depth of 0.6 metres #o a �ewly constructed
shed, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 1.0 me#res setback to all lot lines for all
accessory structures.
The applicant requests approval of thES variance in order to obtain zoning compfiance.
Recommendatian:
The Pla�ning & Developrnent Department considers a south side yard width and an
east rear yard depth af 0.6 metres to a newly constructed shed in the sou#h east corner
af the peaper#y to be major variances that are nr�t desirable for the appropriate
development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent of the Zoning By-faw,
and therefare recommends Refusal of the proposed variances.
/y1ii•"'
The Planrting & Deveiopment Department co�siders a north side yard width and an east
rear yard depth af fl_6 metres to an existing shed to the north east corner of the property
#o be mino� variances that are desirable for the appropriate de�elopmen# o# the land,
and ir� iceeping with the general inter�t and purpose of the Qfficial Plan and the Zoning
By-law, and therefore recommends Approva! of the proposed variances, subj�ct to the
falfowing cond�tions:
That tt�ese variances apply only to the existing rear yard shed lacated in the
north east carner of the lot, as generaily sited and outlined on the applicant's
submittecf plans.
Report P1CA 29i12
Deferred fram tt�e July 4, 2a12 meeting
July 25, 2412
Page 2
_._ ;�
Backg�ound:
At the Cammittee of Adjustment meeting on Juiy 4, 2012 the applicant requested that
the application be deferred in order ta give him time to review the application. The
Cammittee of Adjustment deferred the application to the next Committee of Adjustment
meeting. The app�ica�# met with staff and amended the application to permit a south
side yard width and east rear yard �epth af 0.6 metres to the newiy canstructed shed.
Comment:
flfficial Plan and Zaning By-law
Pickering Qfficial Pfan —"Urban Residential Area —�ow Density Areas" within the
Rougemount Neighbourhood
Zoning $y-law 3036 — "R4"
Appropriateness of the Application
Accessory Struc#ures Setbacks Variances
• the intent of the zoning by-law requiring accessory structures higher than 1.8 metres
in height to be 1.fl metre se#back from lot lines is to ensure that adequate
maintenance access is available to the sicfes of the struc#ures, ensure that the
eaves do not encroach an the adJacent properties, ensure roof drainage stays on
the subject property, and ta minimize the visual impact that their location may have
o� adjacent praperties
• the existing north and east setbacks of 0.6 metr�s for the existing shed in the north
east corner of the property is an existing situation that provides adequate
maintenance access to the sides of the struc#ures
• the existing storage shed located in the north east carr�er of the Iot has not
negatively impact adjacent properties as it has been existing for numerous years
• there have been no complain#s regarding the roof drainage of the existing shed
affecting abutting properties
• #he intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained
• the app�icant amended the application ta permit a south and east setbacks of 0.6
metres to the newly constructed shed whereas, the initial application was to permit
setbacks of a.4 metres to the south and east !ot line
• since the a�plicant is praposing to move the newiy constructed structure, the
applicant should move the structure to comply with the requirement of the By-law
of 1.0 metres setback for accessory structures fram al! lot lines
� the abutting neighbours that are mast affect by the newly constructed shed
provided their oppositian to a reduced accessory structure se#back to the south
and east lot lines
• the proposed reduce setback appears to adversely impact the adjacent property
owners that are rnost visually affected by the proposed shed ta the south of the
property
• the intent of the zoning by-law would not be maintained
�
�
Repor� PICA 29112 �
Deferred from the July 4, 2012 meeting
Input Fram �ther Sources
Development Control
7 neighbouring resEdents at:
333, 336 8� 338 Fiddiers Courk
1400, 1404 & 14�$ Raugemount Drive
31 � TomlFnson Caurt
� Neighbouring Residents at:
306, 30�, 325, 329, & 332 Fiddlers Caurt
Date of repart: July '!8, 2012
Comments prepared by:
��
Mila Yeung
Plar�ner II
MY: RP:Id
oofatmponallQ t?lp�a2& 12-0efeired.doc
Enclasures
July 25, 2012
Page 3
• from a grading and drainage
perspective ail water which falls on top
of these s#ructures must be contained
on the applicanYs praperty
• in opposition to the proposed setback
of 4.4 metres to the newly co�structed
shed
• no objection to the construction of a
gazebo being within tF�e 1.0 metre
minimum setback
• the proposed gazebo wiN impro�e #he
visual appeal of the communit}r
��
Ross Pym, MCIP, PP
Principal Planrter— Development Review
:; � lnformation Compifed from Applicant's
Submitted Plan
PICA 29/12
M. !3� L. Raponi
�""'
�
�
U
V}
.�
J
�
LL
54.8m
- �.�, . - , . • ,�.
; EXISTING �;�
�;
DWELLING
`�"<_ ... ,...�..,,.�. ^
54.8rn
To recognize a 0.6
metre setback
EXiST1NG � � �
SHED fl.sm
�
i
PROPQSED �o.sm
SHED �
�.�--� : � «
To permit a 0.6 metre
setback
Q
TT+s map was produced by the City of Pickering Pianning 8, Development Depanment,
Planning Informalion Services division Mapping and Desiqn, June t9, 2fl72.
Information Compiled from Applicant's .? i�
Subrnitted Pfan
P/CA 29t12
M. � L. Raponi
GRA
��
;�
/ �
/ �,� rn
� \ I
}�..e` ? ., _�
\ �
S�NO 7U8E FOOTINGS
WEST ELEVATION
:� �
;- . o
��:.- - -�------� _ __ . �- .
; _... _
�
�
�-- 3.Om �--� N
i
I
I
� .. ..' _'- _. __.. . _ _'
GRAdE { ___.-------
---..- � _ . � . . �_.�._�
_� �R %'�:
SONC} TUBE FOOTINGS
S4UTH AND EAST ELEVATI�f�
�
�
This map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning 8 Development Department,
Planning Information Services division Mapping and Design, June 19. 2012.
:�
.�...;
..- ����� - _
� � ; �`"`-'.-'-`i'=-- � � _„_�
�."• s-�,:.,� � �-.�i. �
�� . � � ��\
E�
From
Sub�ec#:
Application:
Report to
Commit#ee of Adjustment
Application Number: P/CA 35112
Meeting Date: July 25, 2012
(Deferred from July 4, 2012 meeting)
Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
R�incipal Pianner — Developrnent Re�iew
Cammittee of Adjustment AppEication P/CA 35/12
Wintser Investments Limited
415 Toynevale Raad
(Part af Lots 64 to 66,
City of Pickering
Part 1, Plan 40R-19738)
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2�11, as amended by By-law 1399181
to permit a maximum of 73 children in a Day Nursery facility for the daytime care of
children and a total of 300 children and students enrolled in either a day nursery or a
private non-residential schaol at any one time, whereas tl�e by-law permits a day
nursery facility for the daytime care of not more than 40 children at any ane time and a
maximum total of 150 children and st�dents enrolled in either a day nursery or a private
non-residential school at any one time.
The applFCant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain zoning compliance to
receive site plan approval.
Recommendation:
The Planning & Development Department considers a maximum of 73 children in a Day
Nursery fac�lity for the daytime care of children and a total of 300 children and studen#s
enrolled in either a day nursery or a private non-residential schaol at any one time to be
minor variances tha# are desirable for the appropriate deveiopment of the land, and in
iceep�ng with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and th� Zoning By-law,
ancf therefore recommends Approvaf of the praposed variartces, subject to the
%llawing condi#ions:
1. That these variances apply onfy to the day nursery and private nnn-residential
school, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted �1ans.
2. That the owner prvvide detailed building plans or information to ensure the
building complies v+rith the Qntario Building Code related to the proposed number
of chiidren and students ta the satisfaction of the Chief BuiEding �fficia! prior to
the issuance of any building permit for the property.
Report P1CA 35I12
(Deferred from July 4, 2�12 meeting}
Sackground:
.iuly 25, 2012
f_ �
Page 2
4n July 4, 2d92 the Committee of Adjustment heard this application and deferred it in
arder to allow the owner/applicant time to hold a community meeting with #he immediate
neighbaurs for pub{ic consultation.
The Committee of Adjustment previously approved an appfication for the subject
praperty to permit ��0 total number of children and students enrvlled in either a day
nursery or a private non-�esidential school at any ane time by Committee of Adjustment
Decision P/CA 78/86 on October 'i 5, 1986.
In 24'f �, a minor variance application P1CA 14I10 was submitted by the owner of the
subject prop�rty to {�ermit 0 bus parking spaces on site and a side yard width of
3_9 rnetres to a pfaposed school addition to the existing building. The Committee af
AdjustmenYs cfecisian on t�11ay 19, 2010 approved tF�e 0 bus parking spaces and refused
the side yard width of 3.9 metres to the proposed school addition to the existing
building. This Decisian was then appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) by the
applicant/owner.
The OMB held a hearing on August 3a, 2010 and issued its Decision on
September �, 2010. The Baard granted approval of these variances subject to a site
plan application that included an approprEate landscaping plan. The appEicant has since
submitted a site plan application for the constructian af the proposed new addition and a
proper landscaping plan. In the City's review af the site plan application, the plans
indicated the totai number of students being 297 and thereby, do not comply with the
by-law_ Consequently, this minar variance appfication is �equired to recognize the
existir�g number of students attending the school. The applican# indicated that the
schoo! has been functioning at the 297 student capacity far the past 4 years and is
seeking ta obtain zaning campliance for site plan approval.
It is no#ed that the only actua! construction proposed is the addition that was approved
by the OMB as a res�lt of Committee of Atljustment application P/CA 1�110.
Comment:
�ffcial Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Plan —"Urban Resicfential Area — Low De�sity Area" within the
Rosebank Neighbourhood
Zoning By-iaw 2511 as amended by 13�9181 —"R4(DN}" and 18fi2184
,�..
�
Report P1CA 35t12
{Deferred from .iuly 4, 2012 rneeting}
Apprapriaieness of the Application
July 25, 2012
Page 3
• the intent of iEmiting the number of children permitted within a day nursery is to
ensure that there is adequate area within the buflding and that adequate parking
spaces, amenit}r area an� drop-off/pick-up area is pro�ided on-site for the
permitted use
• there appears to be adequate bui9ding area, parking space, amenity area and
drop-offlpick up area provided on-site
• the praper#y pravides t�� zaning by-1aw required number of parking spaces for
the increased student yield
• there have been no negative Empacts regarding #he overall site func#ion and
o�eratian of the day nursery
• the student capacity is an existir�g situation that needs #o be recognized
• the intent of the zoning by-law is maintained
Input �rorn Other Sources
Owner of 543 Lekani Court
awner of 380 Toynevale Road
Owner of 372 Toyne�ale Road
Owner of 401 Frontier Court
Date of report: July 18, 2012
Comme�ts prepared by:
����
Mila Yeung
Planner ��
MY:RP:Id
coh✓repoAsR0/7lpcaSSt2- defemd doc
Enciosures
• in apposition to the application
• concern with the owners operating the
school in non-compkiance with #he
by-law for four years and impacts on
trees on their property
• in opposition to the application
• a negative impact on the community,
increase in traffic and the disruption of
a quiet and safe en�ironment
• in opposition to the application
• cor�cerns with traffic, noise and
property maintenance
• in opposition to the applicafion
• cQncerns with traffc, noise, sewage
and school capacity
�
Rass Pym, MCiP,�
Principal Planner — Development Review
`� r lnformatFOn Corr�piled from Applicant's
`� � Subrnitted Plan
PlCA 35112
Wintser Investments Ltd.
io permit a max�mum
of 73 children in a
facility for the daytime
care of children
To permit a maximum
af 300 chiidren and
students in a building
to be used as a day-
nursery and private
nan-residential schoo!
TC�YNEVAL� ROAD
...x��..,_. ,
�---- _. ._. �:
� . V.... ,.�.....�
. � .(.J „�, ww+�wr � "_ _ ..... ..... '
a_-^._� .... �f" _.......--r'--
1 � —_� —... --- - - - ti`r '-to
� . ,....: .. ,J - -- .._. �
� �- -�- a-- J --, .
( #{ � .._. 2 i
! �� I i
� } ' I
�I � I PiAY FIELQ 1 �s
I �,
I �i ;�1
4�!°� j {'
E j
, �a � .. � ;':
�_ ��� '\ y. �` ___ �i _� —...._ _:� x� /,
, .
�. ,' ,..
�_.__ �....__..— :
� ; �I � _. F _: - �- ,. _
� �
1' � ,
� i_;,_;,.L _.:' � ' ��.� �
7 '`�n,.: �r_,_.,s �
w �
/, j
`'
,. �
• ..... . ..
4 ;j �
r } - f� --1
.
, � .i..... '� �,__.!
, ,�
� i ` � • �.......�
� *� : �.._..� � __ .: ti
3.7m —� �— ° . . .. � f
_= EXISTING � -� �' �---I `"
�� BuILDlNG r .. _; _ .
;� —
- � `7 .
� --- 3
S
_ { — _ _y. .._ — -
i •, ) .'-
, �' - } �
a`'.• i; � i ; -_ I^ �
r a
3.9m�R � �---- � , ; �
�' e — � i '
} �
-_._..� _,— ._ .� ---`' � I \� - _... .
I
r� \
�`
.�
i
�
�
�
h
1
. N
Fhis map was producod by the City of Pickering Ptanning & DevelopmeM Departmenf,
Planning Informatiort Sa�vices drvision Mapping and Des�gn, June 19. 2012
c`� °� ' Report to
'� ; Committee af Adjustment
' j( T rt� r�
1\ 1 Application Number: PICA 37112 �" �
Meeting Date: July 25, 2012
From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner — Develapmer�t Re�iew
Subject: Committee of Adjustme�t Application P/CA 37/12
�_ Kerr & S. Parks
691 Front Raad
(�at 51, Plan M90}
City of Pickering
Apptication:
The applicants requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511 to recognize an existing north
side yard width of O.G metres to the existing carport attached to the detached dwelling
and to permit a proposed 2 storey detached garage with a height of 5.3 metres in the
rear yard, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 2.4 metres and a
maximum accessory structure height of 3.5 metres for all accessory structures within a
residential zone.
The applicant requests approva) o# these variances in order #o obtain a building permit
for the propased de#ached garage.
Recommendation:
The Planning & Develo�amen# t}epartment considers a height of 5.3 metres a prapose�
2 starey detached garage located �n the rear yard ta be a major variance that is not
desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the
genera! intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law, and therefore recorrrmends Refusal of
the proposed variance.
And
The Planning 8� Development Qepartment considers an existing north side yard width of
0.6 metres to the existing ca�port ta be a minor variance that is desirable for the
appropriate devefopment of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose
of the �ffcia] Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the
proposed variance, subject ta the following conditi�n:
1. That this variance appfy anly ta the existing carport, as generally sited and
outl�ned an the applicant's submitted plans.
Report P/CA 37112
;
w ��
Camment:
Official Pian and Zoning By-law
July 25, 2f}12
Page 2
Pickering Official Plan —"Urban Residential Area — Low Qensity Area" within the Bay
Ridges Neighbaur�ood
Zoning By-law 2511 — "R4"
Apprapriateness of the Appl�cation
Accessoty Building Height Variance
• the intent of the maximum accessory buiiding height of 3.5 metres is to minimize
the visual impact of accessory buildings on abutting properties and on the
streetscape, and to ensure other yards are not significantiy obstructed by these
structures on the property
• the proposed detached garage at 5.3 metres is one-and-a-half times the height
permitted by the zoning by-law and would create an extensive massing that wouid
have a negative visual impact on abutting properties
•#he maximum height of accessory building in the zoning by-law is to restrict ap
accessory buildings to one starey only
• the department is also concerned that the height and size of the propased
garage will encourage the potential of converting the garage into a living space,
thereby resulting with two dwelfing units on one lat which does not comply with
the zaning by-law
• the applicant should reclesign the accessory building to reduce the height
� the intent of the zoning by-law would not be maintained
Side Yard Width Variance
• the intent of a 2.4 metres minimum side yard width for a dwelling withau# an
attached garage is to pravide an appropriate buffer space between structures on
abutting properties and #o provide enaugh space for the parking or passing of a
typical vehicle
• the side yard width of Q_8 metres to #he existing carport is a long standing
condit�on
• a side yard width of 0.8 metres pro�ides for adequate buffering between the
existing structures on abutting properkies and provides enough space for the
parkFng and passing of a typical vehicle through the existing unenclosed carport
• the in#ent af the zoning by-law would be maintained
Report PICA 37112
Input From Other Saurces
�uiy 2�, za�� ,�,�
�ti �
Page 3
Development Control • the height af the propased garage may have
a negati�e impact an the existing trees
surrounding the property
Pro{�erty Owners of:
687 8� fi93 Front Road
1280 Commerce Street
Date of report: July 18, 2012
Comments prepared by:
�
�u
Mila Yeung
Planne� EE
MY: RP:Id
J 1COFA1Repo�5�20121pCB 31-f 2 dOC
Enclosures
• no objection ta the application proposed
�� ��
�Zass Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner — Development Review
�� V
�
Q
Q
�
Z
��/
I..L
�
Information Compiled from Applican#'s
Submitted Plan
PlCA 37112
E. Kerr � S. Parks
A �' ; CARPO
//
,
� EXiSTIf�G
% DWELLING
�ii�.•iiiii�iiiii, �ii.
E
�
E
m
0
_.,
b7.9m
To recognize an
existing north side yard
of O.fi metres
DRIVEWAY
E
0
� 197 .
�_
F{ROPOSED
�?E�ACHER
- GARAGE
i13.7 x 7.9m
I
� .
E
N
�� �
---�
�
- I
To permit an accessory
siructure with a height
of 5.3 metres
�
�� �
7iiis map was pf00ur.ed by 17ie Ciry of Pidcenng Planninp 8 pevelopmenl DepaAmern.
Planninp IMormalio� Services Mapping and Design, July 9, 2072.
`} �
lnformation Compiled from Applicant's
Submitted P1an
PICA 37112
E. Kerr & S. Parks
,, `\
_.
_T _'�.�i�..va:-�. .t"[ �'�[ af�a�a'�:a:��.:'�_ Ti+e ���!;
�����yi � 'r , ♦� '�� .
.., ;;,: :�;,._:j..__ �• �:.�� ..,. ��•� � ..1...�i,,;, . .,..,:1.,:_�:. :�: ' ,!, �
i' � ; ;..i%� :,,..1.`.. .. � . .1. ,1..�.....:...;... . �
�' . .�1. ;�;;1..i.:.;:!' ' ;�..._'.�:�. � �I�!� . •�.1,:�.�_�� •, ��::�'.-- _ �.
� .��. , , l. :-z��._�..:.: ....�i� .:i.. . �. `C:?`..:....,.. - - �,�:� _,
: .i;. �: . I;. ..., �_..'�:__ � .. , �� ;�.
,,, ���..I;:. .. _..:i;` \.. . ��: . .,;.`'r:.�-�� . : ,"�;��" :'�'..:` �.
, u• ....
.i..... -•�. ....,.i_ .. .. , . .:: i : �/�%�' .. _ . _._..
,
.
,,.,., .
� ,:
;�,•..,;.....:..�; .. �� l%`:, .. .
. ,
� �
.i.. _. �...r .. . . ! I i. i; I' , I' :
,: . .
.;:;_ i.::._. :. -- ----..
:.
. ; ••;° FG. i� �
...:...... .. •. ��
. . ` .... . __ �
• } � ,,. J ."��" _...... .. C'�� ..._...._....
., i
ij �
: • : �, I
:.
..: :........ ... ,1; _ _.
_ ' i'.
....
� I:,:,_.:.�= . _..__._ '�i
:...:
: .,:
.�:_:. �
.
,..
.
,
.,.
� . .. . : : � ,.-'" � .
, � . - . .,:
� r. " ,.
.... .,..___;�..;_�._.;._,_. . . . . . . -�- - , : � �
,
..
.. :
:
,
,, :, .
,
.,,.. ! , .... --
. . . . :...___. _ ... . .. ._� .:_..:.
,, � . .
..
_ ,., . .
i , ..
, - -
. ..
,......-.: -,--._.^_.-_._.__..__.J..u_ ; . . . ..-.... ... .. _ �,
: .:_ _. . . . .... .
- - - - `�..'i `� _ .
� : :.: �:... I .
...._.. ... _.. . .
i. .... ... _...........
.. __.... _. _ _ .. ... —.
� ` ---°– -- ... _.._..–--- � -
il _......----..
... " '
�', ' � '�
; ..:_ : . _— �.-_ . . � /
C7 � ;.......`.. ... I . ........ .. .
. `
. . . . T.—� .._ . —_ _
_ , �•I..... .�.
.. _ . .
` { /..
. ... : .
,.
Ui �� ��E � �..: I� I �------._... , , � ;,: _
..�
' j �� ,,•. i i --....._.. i � i: J
� i � . . ; . , r' . ` ( --- : I I .
. .:f
� � ... � I�I� : � I�: � I I If . ' �: .. . I
i :
,
�I .. , .;, ; ; . f:�
1 I�i ��i �� � ; ; :�;
� �_.____' : . : i''�` , `: � ;j � i � ,' L� _ �--� ,� , � f , , � :� i ;
', I I' I : i. I ' li
i ' I :� I�` i {i' I
. � `
, : �; . ;:, ; � ,. � . � � i, , ; ,, �; �
_� , ,
FRQNT{1NEST} ELEVATION
f i
' I I _.
....._� .. ....._.
;-- f . .. .... ._ -� :
i j � -�,
– – - ���°� ��'�
•i ' i
�
., '�� , ,�
i ;, � ! : j -- ; ii ��
I, :I i r I � �� J:
I i . ..'� �'�� ' �
:; �::
:� �>.
,.. :
�..�. ..... � . , - . .,;,, ..i . � .
'�' 'i. .. J : l.. _.-.. .
_ i � _ _.. . � 1 . ^ ii; . .-T:i•. , ' i l
�:
` I ' . . .. . . . . , ' .
_ _.. --- ..T , , . .
. . _
• .. . . �..-.
. .
_ ...__. • ...,:...,..,,...,. ............_ :�.
.. .' � ;
�..... ,.,!.. .. . .�... ...
. . .,. ..... ., . ._. ^ -
.. ,_y � • ' . ...
.. �.1 � .. � � ..1..., : i..' . 1�..,_,.. . . ... . .�..�
_.T„i. .I. :-
, I . . ... .. ....... � � �.�. .. . :.
,{ . . . . A. .:.� ,_. .:. . : , . . . .J.._. .�.i.._ : . �:.. �
_. .- ;. ,�. _ ..,. . .:,.;__... . . . , ..1�.. ��__�l
, . ..
, �...: . . ..
.. . . � r` � �i� . . 1.. � .
. . � .. . . .
�' .
j . _... .. -.... ;I � ..._. I. i r.•': _ .�... �! _.— . ._..__ , . . . �..
.i . _ _ �� ' ... �... '� .. ' I �^
, ._. .
I '
�.: .... _. ._ _ . ._..._. I �
�---� - -
::� .._. � .. . _ { ;
:.� ._. - _
:.j - -'i
�
�: � _. . ... . . ,�
�� ._.. . . .
. .—.—. -- -..
•� _ --- _. — ....
; .. . _ -- ° •
• .__.. _ _. _ . ,
' .:) J� . >� . { �' � ' 1 � �ti 3 ��v, J
. I� . . � .. , ' J. ' ''� _ , � — -
REAR{EAST} ELEVATION
T17is map was produced by the City of Pickering Pianning & DeveloQmeni Department,
P{anning Informatian Services Mapp�ng and Design, .1uly 5. 2012.
�^
t�: �
Informatian Compiled from Appticant's
Submitted Plan
PICA 37l12
E. Kerr & S. Parks
�
. . . . . .'. �. . . . f . . . . ! . ;•.� .'. . , � . . . :
F -
. . . . . • ... . . . � .:. . .;. ..' . .. .. . . . . .�. . . . . . . . . . . .�
..... . ... . . . . . . I
.. ......_...._1 ................ ...�... . . i
... ..�. .f ,
... ...... ..� I
. .... . - -
....... .... .:..1 � �.
.i , i
. . �
"
, + . . !
SIDE(NaRTH} ELEVATI�N
�� � � --. . : : . : � �
;\ ..: .�,.: ...����- � ..
,. .. .
.
. ..
._.. .,_ . , _,..___
, .... ._. . .. , � : ,
� ;.. - - _...�:,_ . ....
� ,_. . �,, ;:: ;.�. :�:�
. :,:
; ,- ... .. . _._._.._ _._ .. ._�- �� ---: �
.' L_ .... _'-_'� _ __._... �
. . . .... . .. . .��_�� ....._:.... . ..
; . � \��. ... . .. 1
.
l ' "_"___._ . .."___"'�'"_ . .. .. . ....._.._ . .\.` . . .
.
,� �. ..... _ _ ..._...."_ _..._ ... "_"__'__'__'"___" "_'_-___. ..
.�.�. ... ......_.... .... ..... .. . ._ .....
1 ' :
"i. ��.. . . ... . . . .. . . .�..
�' 1J
�� � .... ........._.._. . . .... . .. ............ �.._......_ ___... . ..._ _ .._.__ �,
.i - � � ._ �::::_
;,- :,
; � _„ :,s.
�:� .... .
: . . . , _..._ �
;, , _ ��� .
:� � - ; - .� _ �
. :
, : .
_ . . .. . _._.--- . . . ...
, , .
. . .. ----- .
, -; :
-- ------- --- -- . .. _._ . _.: _ _ . .
; ,;. .
: —, - - � s �
, f t-.., ` i , F �� � i _ ' '�:-s` . -�`� '' -
� �= �-; �: °,
i. F.
SIDE{SC}UTH) ELEVATION
This may was produced by the City of Pickering Planning & Development DepaM1mens,
Planniny Infornietion ServiceS Mapping and Design, Jbly 6, 20'12.
��� a� Report to
� °` ' � Committee of Adjustment
j � Appiication Number: P/CA 38112
Meeting Date: July 25, 2012
F�om: Ross Pym, MCiP, RPP
Pr�ncipa� Pfanner — pevelopment Review
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 38112
H. Weber
962 Vist�la Drive
(Lot 391, Plan M-17}
City of Pickering
Application:
The ap�licant requests relief frarn Zoning By-law 2520, to permit a reduced rear yard
depth of 5.5 metres to a proposed one-storey addition onto the rear of the existing
detached dwelling, whereas the by-!aw requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres.
The applicant requests appro�a) of this variance in order to obtain a building pe�mit for
the proposed addition.
Recamrnendation:
The Planning 8� Develapment Department cansicfers the rear yard depth of 5.5 metres
to a proposed ane-storey addition onta the rear af the existing detachec! dwelling to be a
mino� variance that is desirabfe far the appropriate development of the land, and in
keeping with the generai intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law,
and therefare recommends Approval of the p�oposeci �ariance, subject to the following
conditians:
1. That this variance applies only to the proposed one-stor�y addition, as generally
sited and outlined an the app�icant's submitted plans.
2. That the appiicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by
July 25, 2014, or this decision st�all become null and void_
Repart PICA 38/'E 2
• iC�3'.�' i�iT�'r�
flfficial Plan and Zoning By-law
July 25, 2012
Page 2
��
Pfckering O�ciaf Plan — Urban Residential, Low Density Areas within the West Shore
Neighbou rhood
Zoning By-law 2520 —"R4" — Fourth Density Residentia! Zone
Appropriateness of the Applicatian
Rear Yard Depth Variance
• the intent of the minirrtum 7,5 metre rear yard depth is to ensure that a useable
amenity space is provided in the rear yard and to provide an appropriate buffer
spaee between dwellings on abutting praperties
• a useable amenity space wilf be provided
• an a{�propriate buffer space between dwellings on abutting properties wifi be
maintained
• the sub}ect property backs onto Glen Ravine Park, therefore there will be na
impact on abutting properties
• the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained
Date of re�ort: July 18, 2012
Comm ts prepared by:
�-_.,.;.�-{.
a-�c:.xx�
i
Ye@rwood, M� , RPP
P�anner II
AY: RP:Id
J:ICUfAVieporlbt2012�pte 3& 12 da
Enclasures
C/� � ` �
Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner — Development Re�iew
�G
W
�
�
�
Q
F-
�
�
�
Information Compiled fram Applicant's
Submitted Plan
PICA 38112
H. Weber
�
�r.�r :
� �r
: � �
� N r� EXISTI NG
; � � 2 STOREY .
• , � DWEtLI NG
� � � � �_�_
�� •� ' � PROPOSEC
�( _. GARAGE
� �' r EXTENSIQi�
;-4 7.7m � - .a.��l.�`�1'..�f_<�«'1�:. r'��
� .
�._....._�..r----- � __ .� � 30.5m
� .___�
i '
�
33
,
._... . _ _._.�_. __..,..�_�..._._...� i
, � .`,;.
� :
�
, � �
._ ,
.�.-f . �
� �.
�
:
�
;�
- - �? PROPO5EC
�" 'i STOREY
ADDITION
_ _ � . '"
:.3��'�
C g!
( N.i. ��_.—._.._..7
To perrnit a rear yard
depth of 5.5 metres
i
��
,'
5.5m ---►
i
—'_.�
- ,-�-;
�
*.
Q
�
Thia m2p wes p�Oduced by ihe City ot Pickerirtg Planning � DCVelopment Deparimen!.
Planning InfOrmation Sarvices Mapping and Design. Jv1y 5, 2012.
�� �
.., `�
Informatian Compifed from Applicant's
Submitted Plan
P/CA 38112
H. Weber
,l` ���
�i - . .__ .1-
_'�-- .. `�`�
_ �:i - - - -- _ ,- _. - - -
__ �� -_ v � �k i i '� �4
_ - -- � __..
__ _ ,. ,
:- - . T - �"�` • -
� �
•' �� . I �
�;�l� ��I
;���� ��j. �
������
� �����
�ia�����;�
. i .. i .-
0
i��
�
^' . _ . • - �
- �j • '
� �f • :
k ��
; E
i;t .;� '.
_ �i
REAR ELEVATION
�
�
�
�
L
�
This map was produced by 7he City of Pickering Planning � Development Depariment.
Planning information Services Mapping and Design, July 5, 2012.
Ittform�tio� Compiled from Applicant's � �
Submitted Plan
PlCA 38112
H. Weber
�
�
_- --
;
�
� ��i
� � 4
� � ! < �
� � �: ;
� �. �
-
.
.�.� .. _ .. . T ..�r:. .,�.w.r....��
13.5m
SIDE (SOUTH} ELEVATIDN
3.fim
SIQE tNORTH) ELEVATIDN
This map wes pioduced by the Cily of pidcering Planninp 8 PBVebpmern Deparlmert,
Planninp Irtformation Services Mappinp aM Design. Juiy 5, 2Q72.
: w= ::::a;_ ���,�,: _.�
�_ _�� ;� �-, .
�� :.:��-�.,�w�:�
� ���.
��
Report to
Committee of Adjustment
Application Number: PICA 39/12
Meeti ng Date: July 25, 20 � 2
From: Rass Pym, MCIP, RPP
P�incip�l Planner — Qe�elopment Re�iew
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 39112
1685404 Ontario Ltd.
1023 Brock Road
(South Part of Lot 18, Concession 1, Part 2, 40R-i 8713}
City of Pickering
Application:
The applicant requests relief from Za�ing By-law 25� 1, to permit a north side yard width
of 1.� metres and to permit a maximum of 50 percent (8 parkin� spaces} of the required
parking spaces in t�e front yard for a�aroposed new building for an automotive repair
garage use, whereas the by-{aw requires a minimum side yard with of 4.5 metres and a
maximum front yarcf pat'king of 20 percent (4 parkEng spaces).
The applicant requests approval of these variances in arder ta obtain Si#e Pfan appro�al
and a buildi�g permit for the pfoposed develo�ment.
Recommendation:
The Planning & Development Department considers the north side yard width of 1.5 metres
and a maxirnum of 50 percent of the required parking spaces to be loca#ed in the front
yard for a proposed new building fo� an automative repair garage use to be minor
variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping
with the general intent and purpose of the �ffcial Pian and the Zoning By-faw, and
therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject ta the following
conditians:
1_ That these variances apply only to the proposed parking layout and praposed
one storey buiiding, as generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs submitted
p(ans.
2. ihat the applicant obtain Site Plan approval and a building p�rmit for the proposed
constructian by July 25, 2014, or this decision shaf! become null and void.
Background:
The applicant previously submitted a minor variance applicatian (PICA 11/47) that
requested the same variances. The application was appraved howe�er it became null
and void as the conditions of approval were not satisfied.
Repart P1CA 39I12
Comment:
Qfficial Pian and Zoning By-law
�U�y 2�, 2a� 2
Page 2 � ^��
�
Pickering Official Plan —"�mployment Areas — Mixed Employment" within the Brock
Industrial Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 2�11 —"M1" — Storage and Light Manufacturing Zone
Apprapriateness of the Application
North Side Yard Variance
the intent of a rriinimum 4.5 metre side yard width is to maintain an appropriate
bufFer space between builc#ings, the uses on the subject property and acti�ities
an adjacent properties
the propased 1.5 metre north side yard wi�th .would maintain an apprapriate
buffer space between the praposed automative repair building and adjacent
industrial buildings
the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained
Front Yard Parking Variance
• the intent of the maximum 20 percent front yard parking requirement is to
minimize the visual impression frorn the street of extensive parking lots in front of
buildings
� tt�e front yard parking on the subject property will consist of two rows of parking
and ane two-way drive aisie
• the requested �4 percent front yard parking represents fou� additional parking
spaces in the front yard, and a sufficient landscape buffer area would continue to
be maintained in the front yard
• aii parkir�g spaces are praposed to have a minimum setback of 3.0 metres from
Brock Road, which will minimize the �isual impact of the spaces along the Brock
Road streetscape
• the applicant will be required to provide a�propriate landscaping features to buffer
the front yard parking area from Brock Road during the Site Plan approval process
• the intent of the zonin� by-law would be maintained
Date of report: July 'f 8, 2012
Camments prepared by:
/%�� �
�' '�Y ::1'Y�
ey , MCIP, RPP
Pianner II
AY:RP:Id
J'.1COFAljiepoA5170121pca 3&IZ EoG
Enclosures
�
Ross Pym, MCI , RPP
Principal Planner — �3evelopment Review
�
H
z
Q
i..�
tl.
Q t]
� Z J
� � r �
W W M Z
a���
�m�-�
a �
U� �
Z �
O �
Q
�
0
z
a�
�
�
t
�
0
c
E
� �
�� �
c r.
�� �
� O
� 3
a�
� T
�
� O
�
��.�
��
��
o�
4 �
� �
�
0
�� �
Q��
� a �,
YM n
,�,, wa 1a�scu
II !�� i���E ��i �� � E��Et' �j fl�� �� li r Ij � �� f;;'
�1' �
��g���' j;ill ` i � . , 3 t : ± irra�{+�i''� 1�41� � ?i�iaiii
� W
' W �
0 Q
_ am
O �
_ �4
a�
!
�,
T
f;:?+ ��I!f i"Jl�li.11l�lll 11111[I�!Ifijl!i�ijl �;��d
�� � I
I � _ ' 1
; I i
' I �
� � — _ I
i ^, �
� � i
' w 9�E I
��� E I
� �
,( � �
I �4.8 i
�, f-- w £"£ L- ►
� .; �
E' \;` �
. � , �
h ��. '�. ' �
r � i
�\ � I
�\ � I
I � �
. I �`\ ,\
.". �.
\ ;::;, \.
! `; � � �
, I :� �;::. � I
+ � �� ; I
� \\ ` � 1
. � ti E � rs
� '��� ro ' �e�
� �� "
a �
� � �� `I I
� ����\�\ �`' 1 �
\�\\�' ' �
�' ' � \.,� �
� � � � � , ;
�
G�\!,�\. � \ 4
1 M�\ �� \.\� i S
� � \ \ \' 1 k
�
� � � �
� � ' ' 3 �•� �
� o- �
N
N
} I , (
' f
� �{
�
�-
+--�—� ~ 18.6 m
a�Ea�r xao�rs
�
u�iaW
OWC7
�
� v �
aa
a
c n
m�
0
�y D cv
l:..+ V 0 �p
a
m J
,��� ��
W c
��
� m
�n
��
a
��
c �
� n
a�
��
U m
� �
m �
a�
Cl C
�a
a�
��
�m
`� C
L �
N p
n
�i�
�
�
z
a
U
J
a
Q o
gZ J
� 0. � �
�
W W M Z
��V�
�ma�
�
v �, �
Z �
� �
Q
�
�
0
LL
Z
�. rn 1`— �
� ,�'�� �� 3 ;.
. � � �
, � " ,,
; i ., � o ,:
. i:
� � r � �,
, �� a;--�
F
Z
¢
J
a
w
z
z
�
W
�
M-- �
M[.
i---� � r�'.� ..... r
r � I .
�--ti. :. � _ �i
' . '. . ��_� . � . .
.�;...�.`Y I I .` .. . .. .I
� I `"�'y�^; , .-�' — '-. —�- � i a �
;.
. � � . _. �
! •: :. ; .: �:.. '- �
; �-- � � ----=-�-r-�--�:--�:; �._:.
_ .. ._ — J
. �� `_ .�, ' . x .
. � .._ '�%_.�..�.'::
I.._ � .....
�� _.__ ��_�I
µ�,."_ ��
I -
� . � �+
i�� _� �� -1 •
. ;i ::.- .� -
,:�.- ��:
; i ._ - -- .. �.
.� ____
i � ____ —;___.,_;
� � <_ ;�=i-�--<.-. �-
;� �,_ �.�,
_ -. -,=-_
� ` . . J�' ; �:- �: ;:
_.;h. ...,
�.. , . _
�� ='' .
; �
} : i -' n . r . J--���
iJl ��� ; �� I;i �
3 : I �' �, 3 ° —J
,� ,�,
� , �
' � �� a[w L : ,..,.
�i i � i � �
L^ I � r. , s R z��. .
� i � �° '}`_'�' �.i�� �^
,�
'�
��
; I� " .
�I � %'
, , � ; _.
;
�
- , ; �___.
i �.
R �;
. �
^
.._ � . '--r-�...r�i �� � .
^ � •-��
�—�—_._. �:a.
Z
�
a
0
O
�.
0
z
�
0
�
�
C N
��
j T
U ]
Q �
�I� � C
��t4
C O
C
ma
a4
rn�
� c
� a
�
��
d
r_
V y
L �
� O
mW
v €
0
�`c
°o �
a 'c
N C
a ro
3a
v�
�d
N =
L
F'� p
O
C`t� °� Report to
' ' Committee af Adjustment
�
R �� �.
Applicativn Number: P/CA 4Q/12
Nleeting Date: �iuly 25, 2012
From: Rass Pym, MCiP, RPP
Principal Pfanner -- Development Review
Subject: Cammittee of Adjustment Application P/CA 40112
E. McKirtnon
8S9 �'ront Road
(Part Lat 3, Plan 65 Block E, Part 2& 3, 40R-5378)
City af Pickering
Application:
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511 ta pe�mit a front yard depth of
4.� metres and a south side yard width of 0.5 metres ta a proposed raised deck
attached to the front of the existing dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum
#ront yard depth o# 7.� metres and a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres.
The appficant requests approval of this variance irr order to obtain a buiiding permit for
the proposEd raised deck.
Recommendation:
The Planning & Development Department cons�ders the front yard depth of 4.5 metres
and a south side yard width af 0.5 metres to a proposed raised deck attached to the
feont of thte existing dwelling to be minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate
develapment of the land, and in keeping w�th the general intent and purpose of the
Officiaf Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approva! af the
proposed variances, subject to the following conditions:
1. That these variances apply only to the proposed deck, as generally sited and
outlined on the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That #he applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by
July 25, 2014, or this decision shal! become null and void.
Report PICA 40112
.*�'
`2 4
Comment:
Official Plan and Zaning By-law
July 25, 20� 2
Page 2
Pickering Official Plan —"Urban Residentiai Area — Low Density Area" wi#hin the Bay
Ridges Neighbaurhood
Zaning 8y-law 2�11 — "R4"
Appropriateness of the ApplicatEOn
Front Yard Depth Variance
• the intent of the front yard depth of 7.5 metres is to provide adequate buffer
space between buildings and street activity, and ta provide an adequate
lar�dscaped area and parking space at the front of the property
• the variance far a 4.5 metres front yard depth provides adequate landscaped
area at the front of the property
• the parking of vehicles on the properiy is accommodated in the rear yard rathe�
than the front yard and t�erefore the space required for the parking of vehicles in
the front yard is nat a requirement for this proper#y
• the front yard depth pravides adequate buffer space between buildings and street
activity
• a publ�c park, Frenchman Bay East Park, is directly opposite the subject property
on the west side of the Frant Road
• traditionally amenity space on a residential property is provided in the rear yard
but an the subject property the amenity space is provided in the front yard across
from the public park
� t�e proposed var�ance would maintain the neighbourhood character on Front
Road that has a variety of front yard depths, with ar without decks attached to the
main dwelling
• the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained
[•�C�'f.TtlLT1CI�i1�FTi -F�T��
• the in#ent of a 1.5 rnetres minimum side yard width is to provide an appropriate
buffer space between structures on abutting properties
• the proposed variance far a side yard width of 4.5 rnetre to the proposed front
yard deck continues the appraved side ya�d width of 4_5 metres to the existing
dwellir�g that was approved by the Committee of Adjustment in applicatior�
P1CA 14l84
• the proposed side yard width provide sufficient buffer space befinreen structures
•#he existing fron# door to t�e house i
and a landing o� the prapased deck
• the intent of the zoning by-law would
s lacated on the south side �f the building
is required in this location
be maintained
Re�ort PlCA 40/12
Inpu# From Other Sources
Owner of 667 Front Road
Date of report: July 18, 2012
Comments prepared by:
(����
Mila Yeung
Planner II
MY_RP:Id
J �.tCOFAYtepoM1Sl2012ipce 0412 doc
Enclos�res
July 25, 2012
Page 3
appos� to the appfication due to the negati�e
impact it wouid have on the privacy o# their
home
O�� �
Ross Pym, MCfP, RPP
Principal Planner — Development Re�iew
'4 �
,
�
Ff2ENCHM.4N "S BAY
w
�
Z
w
<
�
w
�
a
�.
WATERP�NT
�
�
�
■
����f�����ii����� 1
� � ►
:111 �
. . .. ... .
- �ii���iir=�
:�����iiii���i� '
�• ... . I
ING AVE.
„
�
0
z
�
_ _, �. ,
_ � , .
�, ,�`'.:.
� ,�
'.'. =f:.-
�
,,,,111,,,
1,"'1,11'
B
W�1A CRT.
HOL
�11�'��'1�"1 ��
• �
�1��� � _�1� - =..,
�r� ■� � ■.II111i
�� �� - : -...
� � �� �������
.�� ; . �■ i �111111
�♦ •►► _ �
J
PROPERTY °
� STREE7
WHARF �
>
J
�
City of Pickering Plann+ng & Development Department
PROPERTY DESCRiPTION Pian 65, 81ock E, Part Lot 3, 40R-5378 Part 2, 3 �
OWNER E. McKinnan DATE July 3, 2012 DRAWN BY JB
FILE No. PiGA A�/12 SCALE 1:5,000 CHECKED BY MY N
� o��.e: o� .,,,,..y. PN-3
T�rvn�t EnteroK�e� Inc. onQ K� suPPll�ri. All Aqrt� R���rv�d. Not o Dlan
9ni � uPAC ane it� •ueell�r�. All l�aht� R���rveC. Not C p�on vt °.uNfy_ __
�
��
Z �
�
�
�'o
��
�
information Compiled from Applicant's
Submitted Plan
PICA 44112
E. McKinnvrt
'��35 am
J� ";
,�,. . --
�
�� EXISTING
'%' DWELLING
:}
PROPOSED`� - "�
DECK
� . _ _3r� gsn
,.f,_..
.5m
� '0.5m
To permit a south side
yard width of 0.5
To permit a front yard metres
depth of 4.5 metres
r� �
r �
�� ^_�... ti
��
�
�.� �
`
DEi'ACHED !.
� GARAGE '�.
o3m� .
�.
,`� - �
,
Q
This map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning 8 Development DepaAment.
Planning Intorma�ion Services Mapping an6 Design, Jufy 6. 2092.
�# } Infarmation Compiled #ram Appl�can#'s
Submitted Plan
PlCA 40/12
E. McKinnon
�
FRONTtWEST} ELEVATION
SIQE(NORTH) ELEVATI�N
Th�s map was produced by the Ciry of Pickering Planning & Development Departmeai.
Planniny In(ormation Services Mapping and Design, Joty S. 2672.
Ct� °� Report to
' '; Committee of Adjus#ment
I � R Application Number: P/CA 41112 �� !
. Meeting Date: July 25, 2012
From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner — Development Review
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 41/12
J. 8� L. Varga
717 Hillview Crescent
{Lot 96, Plan 331 }
City vf Pickering
Appticatian:
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511 to permi# a north side yard width
of 0.8 metres and a south side yard width of 1.'! metres to a single storey addition with
an attached garage onto the existing detached dwelling, whereas the by-law req�ires
minimurn sicfe yard widths of 9.5 metres.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for
the proposed additian with attached garage.
Recommendation:
The P�anr�ing 8� Development Department considers the south side yard with of
1.1 metres to the praposed attached garage anto the proposed dwelling addition to be a
major variance that is nat desirabfe for the appropriate �evelapment of #he land, and not
in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-faw, and therefore
recommends Refusa! of the proposed variance.
r��
The Planning & Development Department considers the north side yard width of 4.$ metres
to a single s#orey addition onto the existing detached dwelling to be a minor �ariance
that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the
general intent and purpose of the Officiai Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore
recammends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the following conditions:
1. Th�at this variance apply only ta the existing dwelling and proposed dweiling
add�tion, as generally sited and outfin�d on the applicant's submitted plans.
2_ That the applicant ob#ain a building permit for the proposed construction by
July 25, 2014, or this decision shall become nu11 and �oid.
Report P1CA 41112
r'� �
Comment:
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
July 25, 2412
Page 2
Pickering 4fficial Pian -- Urban Residential Area — Low Density Area within the West
Shore Neighbourhaocf
Zoning By-law 2�11 — "R4"
Appropriateness of the AppEication
• the intent af a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres is to maintain an established
character of openness, to maintain a buffer space between dwellings and adjacen#
lots, and ta pravide adequate access ta #he rear yard of the property
= a north side yard width of 0.8 metres ta the existing dwelling is an exis#ing situatian
that was approved �y the Committee of Adjustment on December 16, 19$0
� this application requests to extend the north side yard width of Q.8 me#res to the
proposed dwelling addition attached to the existing dwelfing in order to maintain a
consistent building wall
• a north side yard width af 4.8 metres provides an adequate buffer space for the
subject pro�erty #o its abutting r�eighbaur as it is an extension af an existing
situatia�t
• given that the north side yard width of 0.8 metres is proposed, a south side yard
width of 1.5 metre is required to maintain an established character of openness
and to provide adequate access ta the rear yard of the property
• the application proposes a south side yard variance that will continue the existing
south side yard width to the detached garage
• the zoning by-law requires greater side yard widths for principle buildings and
dweflings than accessory buildings, due to the difference in size and massing of a
principie buildir�g and dwelling from accessory buiidings
• cu�rently on the propert}r, access to the rear yard is provided between the existing
dwelfing and detached garage
• the proposed dwelling addition, propQSes to close ofF the gap between the existing
dwelling and detached garage thereby removin� the existing access to the rear
yard of the property
• the proposed south side yard of 1.1 metres would not be su�cient to mainta�n an
es#ablished character af openness an� provide adequate access to the rear yard
of the property
• the applicant has provided no land-use justification for the reduced sou#h side yard
width and new canstructian should be designed to comply with the zoning by-law
• the intent of the zoning by-law would be maFntained with a north side yard width of
4.8 and a sou#h side yard width of 1.5 metres
•#he intent of the zoning by-law would not be maintained with a north side yard
width of 4.8 metres and a south side yard width of 1.1 metres
Report PlCA 41112
Date af �eport: .luly 18, 2012
Commenis prepared by:
���
Mila Yeung
Pianne� II
MY:RP.id
J:tCOFAV?epur131i0121pca 41.72.doc
Enclosures
J u ly 25, 2012
Page 3
�w3� �
Ross Pym, MCEP, �
Principat Planner — De�elopment Re�iew
��
F
�
V
W
�
U
�
W
�
�
_
/
�nformation Campiled from Applicant's
Submitted Pian
PlCA 41112
J. 8� L Varga
E
�
- j,,, 42.2m °
. - Y _ . •
.a.w.� . .. . �r,�.. ., .._. �.y. . y .. ^.
i
.._ '�,.. _.., ...... �._ _.. _.._ .__ ._ ' .�..... _ . � .....
• � •
� PROPOSED t- --- - . . . 13.7m_ Y.
� EXISTING 1 STpREY
� 1 STOREY ADDITION
F DWELLING 70.9mz �
• 7.Om —�• $� 9rn� PROP�SED °O
' dECK �
�- i
� , _� .
,�� __ .� PROPOSEDATTACHEDGARAGE �
_� _ _. . � _ .. _. _ . ... ,
j ��---------,
� � �
To permit a north side
yard width of Q.8
metres
�:��'��E1�'AY
�.. _ .._ _.._ __ .�. ._. .._ ___ .
.� _
� _ __ . . 43.�m ...
�
� EXISTING QETACHED � �
E GARAGE 1. t
! � � �
...�� . ..
.._ � . _ -----� _ _._.x.--� __... .
. ! 1.Sm�� --- - 9.7m . _ . 2.4rn � - E
.
, :
i � r
; ,
To pennit a south side
yard width af 1.1
metres
N
�
�
i
�
Q
5�
This map was produced by the City ot Pidcenng Planning 8 Devebpmen[ DeparlmeM.
Planning IMormation Services Mapping and Des+gn, July 70, 20f2.
��
.
Information Compiled �rom Applicant's
Submitted Plan
PlCA 41112
J. � L Varga
13.1&m . 1 .
; , __ .
_-��,, PROPOSED
, a � ,i � '� I� 1� �� ., 1 STOREY
ADD�TION
, i �, ,� F � � :�
..� • � �
? �� • € i I ��
i �,
�
' ����
. . , � ,;
� .. ._ �...
..
, : � ;'�� I
� i � �� ' ,j
� I i
EXiSTtNG � �; , r��� -' F��� �
; .� _ � :
. ;. „ .
i 1 STflREY i r....__ ._.._..__' �
_ ... _ QYUELUNG � :
: �� � � _ : , ,
� ;.
: � : ; ��._
_, . . .. . . �.� :_. _ ...__ .. .._ � �
.
.
,
._
-- - - _ _ - �. . . _. . .. _ �; ,� ;
l '�
. ; ;;
� �i
�_ , fl.; ti '.... �� ��r. ra ._ �:. . . . i
FRt�NT (WEST} ELEVATION
�
,
�
�
i
F
;
�
REAR (EAST) ELEVATION
This map was produced by the City of Pickering Ptanning 8 pevelopmaM Department,
Planning Informativn Serv�ces Mapping and Dsaign. Juty 70, 2012.
Informatian Compiled from Applicant's
Submitted Plan
PICA 41112
J. 8� L Varga
�:..:,
— . �ROPOS�a
���-� .` --- 1 STOREY
/ ADDITfON
J� ^'� f . t �
/
/�
__ .__.-- - - - . ._ ...._—. ---- - -- -
--: . __— :. �... . _ .-- - . _� .� _..
__ EXISTI�IG r`� .-la I i ,, E �' ,, r
1STOREY �' i; �: �;� t ii ��?i� ; �,�
DWELLtNG ` ' � � � `• ; � : ;
.. �
' � "I'��j� �
„ , ; ,
; �
c-_..�. ; { � '; • � t � 's i � 't i ' � S � ' E .i�� �
� . ..i_ LiL.�.�_..L�� _. �L�i _�.
,...�-._.a. —�.� _.
� SOUTH SIDE ELEVATI{�?N
PROPOSED
• 1 STOREY
AQQlTlON
� � �� -
, ,
; �,' � � �' '� ( ;
; !,
I i I �' N �
I� � I� �. �� � 1� � el I
+ . � ,4 �' 1 ! I �j
:� .2rrtt- 10.3m
�.._. .._._
,
�
r
�
� '
.......
t � t � !> �� F EXISTING
� $ ' ' • ? 1 STOREY
, � ' ' ' .. DWELLING
� �i � ` � .
i � j � � �
. . ....._ .... .... .........�...._ .. . ...
� -�-'-�_._ .. ..... .......... .
NORTH SIQE ELEVATI�N
�.
i
.j
1I
t .. .
��
This map was produced by the City ot Pickenng Plannirrg fl Devebpmerit departmarn,
Planning Intormation Serviws Mapping and Des�gn, Juy i0, 2012.
��� °� Report to
' ; Committee of Adjustment
� i I KER
Application Number: P/CA 42112
Meeting Date: July 25, 2012
From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner — Qeveiopmen# Review
Subject: Cammittee of Ad�ustment Application PlCA 42112
1473714 Ontario Ltd
875 Bayly Street
(Part of Block 6, Plan M-20, Part 1, 40R-5876}
City of Pickering
Application:
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520 to recognize an existing south
side yard width of 4.3 metres to an existing ane-storey commercial plaza and to permit a
reduced number of required parking spaces ta 48 in order to permit a new 38 square
metre outdoar patio, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 4.5 metres
ar�d a�ninimum af 50 parking spaces.
The applicant requests appraval af this variance in orcier to obtain Site Plan appro�al.
Recommendation:
The Plan�ing 8� Development Department considers the existing south sid� yard width
of 4.3 metres and to permit 48 parking spaces for the commercial plaza with a new
38 square metre outdoor patio tQ be minor variances that are desirable for the
appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose
of the afficial Plan and the Zonin� By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the
proposed variances, subject to the following conditions:
That these variances appfy only to the commercial plaza with a proposed
38 square metre outdoor patio, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's
submitted plans.
2. That the applicant obtain Site Pfan Approva! for the proposed construction by
July 25, 2014, or this decision shall became null and �aid.
Comment:
Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickerfng O�cial Plan —"Urban Residential —�.ow Density Areas within #he West Shore
Neighbourhood
Zon�c�g By-law 2520 -- "C1" -- Locaf Commercial Zone and "RM1" — Mufti Residential Zone
Report PICA 42I12
Appropriateness of the Application
Side Yard Width Variance
July 25, 2Q12
Page 2
�J
• the intent af the minimum 4.5 metre side yard depth requirement in the �y-law is
to maintain an appropriate b�affer between the uses ancf activities on adjacent
praperties
• the commercial plaza currently exists on #he property
• the existing dr�ve aisle prav�des an appropriate buffer which separates the plaza
from residential uses to the south
• the ir�tent of the zoning by-law wnuld be maintained
Nlinimum Parking Variance
• the intent af the minimum parking space requirement in the zoning by-law is to
ensure that adequate on-site parking is provided ta accammodate the amount of
parking ger�erated by the use of the property
• based on a parking rate of 5.5 spaces per 100 square metres of gross floor area,
a minimum of 5a parking spaces is required on the subject property to serve the
existing commercial plaza
* the proposed ou#door patio will not require additional on-site parking and
suffic�ent parking will �e maintained for customers attending the restaurant,
especially durin� the plaza's non-peak times
•#he intent af the zvning by-law woufd be maintained
Input F�om Qther Sources
Ken Fufler • opposed to the proposed re�uced number of parking
918 Nlarrnet Crescent spaces due to potential noise issues related to loud
restaurant pat�ons in the late evening hours
Date of report: July 18, 2�12
Comments prepareci by:
<.��::� �
�� �Er.<.�z4J
,
easwaod, N1�1P, RPP
Planner li
AY:RP:Id
J:ICOFAVtepoAs52012�pw 42•12.doc
Enclosures
o✓�/� �n
Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner — Development Re�iew
��
��
/�
�v
0� /
� �'� HOL Y
R£DE'EMEt7
CATNOLIC
CNURCN
� DRIVE
� Q
� Ol/R LADY �
OF TH£ BAY s
SEP.9RATE
SCHOOL
TOT LO
BAYFA/R
BAPT/ST
CHURCH
�Q1
�.y P�
��G�
�
�
BR`!G�
Z
w
�
a
� --�
=:: ir■ ..
�� �� �
�� ' i� �,'
�� �� '' •.
�._ __ =�r,
__ __ �
__ __ _.
__ __
__. __
_____�
__.__. _►,
�� �� � �
_: :: � =r�
FRENCHMAN S �,,�,
BAY �'-'
a
r-
�
FAIRPORT �
BEACH U
PUBUC > °a
SCNOOL o 0
PUBL/C SCNOOL �
ORIVE OKIAHOMA a
p w
s �p2F. }
Gity of Pickering Planning & Development Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Plan M20, PBrt BIOCk B, 40R-5876 �
owNER 1473714 Ontario Inc. DATE July 3, 2012 DFlAWN BY JB
F{LE No. P/CA 42/12 SCA�E �;5,fl4Q CHECKEQ BY MY N
i p DU/CO{
T�rvnet Ent�ryrt��• Inc. d it� yPll�f�. All rlqhts R���rv�C. Not o Olan o1 .,,�.,.. PN-2
3012 MPAC and (ts �uonlf�rs. All rtaht� R�s�rv�d. Not a olan of Survev.
Information Compiled from Applicant's
Submitted Plan
PICA 42112
1473714 ONTARIO LTD.
BAYLY STREET
� .. ----- - _._ .� , , -_.------- ---� - _..l - -
�6 � , , i :
' ........ Etlsiing °: � ; I ' � � �
\:_ Pa: pmg sa temain \• Z7 � I I � i � � :
i
48 \ ' Fzisiing
�c ....... � . .
Eri:•. 7?:c.� �•r.c rap . pzrking to rernai�i
\��`� �� U. m:n:i � � 6.1m;
�`" ° + \ � �.--'1'. � .
���d 9 j' .' "28 T 29� � �
y i FXiST Proposed ��
. � . �
\. �O HC :Patlo ... � � .
� "� � �I I
�, �� �.. _. _� ..... ........ . . . r�.
� \ ¢ n<r.�;��^ �
\\ rer. srcp .. .
E q � WEST SHORE
�\�y,;.' y BAR AND GRIL�E
\ / � \ `� 170.9m'
� ae e.�:c,q
\ �� � SIMGlE5i0xE�S14PfLhiA
� a'
� �\ �� � �
\ `\ w
� \ N x
♦
� \ x 51ivg � a
�
� � � � �-� -- oncway' W �emain j �,_,
'�
7o permii a minimum
of 48 parking spaces
to support a proposed
outdoor patio
� - -��
; �
� 10� �
i.•...�,�r^,. L9_—` ' � I
3IIi'S., .. . �
_ i , . .. . .. . i �
39 -. s
_.. ._-. FxisGnq ----. �
� pukingtoretr.�.q---'—'
i �
23oM . ..� i•:+1c'�On
_ . _ '._ .... .. .... ...
' _._...—"'_"'i
: / . �:i.Cr'+-li:
--- 4
i . ...!'�, .
, .. :. .
' 45 �yiylinq
_-�-- ...... . main Er.lrance
To recognize a south
side yard width of 4.3
metres to an exisiing
one storey commercial
plaza
�7
❑
Jry�
e��
L.L
0
Vl
V /
W
�
�
�
�
This map was produced b/ tfie City oi Pickering Planninr� & Development Department.
Planning Information Services Mapping and �esign. July 6, 201 T.
��
1nfo�mation Campiled from Applicant's
Submitted Plan
P1CA 42112
1473714 ONTARIO LTD.
� 6.11[1L.. ---...... ;
�... . .._._
– --= =a=�� - —
,...., .
: . .F . .. ,. •iE' <..c_.
�._ - . �° .. -- � � -- ; �_: -
�;- -- "�;
� 3'
i " � <
� Sp . f � �
• i : •. 1
�-: __k- . _ ..._... � A Y Z . •.--. , ._ �� :
r� *.r. j, c'c '>y 3= �1I� �s�, �.-�{ ,i - � y
I--- '- .:...... �\;, r--'�- �.I i
E ----?.��r ' ------,. —'�
.. . --.. '"--
r- � :- . .- -� � -, - , �- -
cfl I � S. ..- :. ...' I j
- t _ - �.- � :f - 1
.. . : -- ._.__. � �J{ ; _. - -`:'��i
�
_ _.
.---...: ` - ---- ' ° t � ' ...._�
.. -?" 'k-:; . . ���aZ ":._� i__��
'/ ar.� `�" J �`�
� ' — -- I �1.5m. ,
t"
r�:,. c� s�r mx r
� ^w�,�',� ,
.os,,.•
E ��
�„� �� t:�s; ::.r_�re:� . ...
�....... 1•:.�I��:Y:'�;:��rir�li �
M �
5 ��v:.: �rrY'S:
o�ce� s: -e;au?r
. ne x�>i � . �
�
� ll�'.lF; r��i HG
_ — — �-- GOwC�E'i CJPB
' �ONEYFY
Aroposed Patio Plan on existing
Parking lot at ihe
}ront of ihe existing Restaurant
1NEST SHORE BAR AND GRILLE
0.1 m
,.. . r--- ---
� ��
� I I`
o �.
� � ___
;
PATIO FENCE
ELEVATION
This map was produced by Ihe Ciry ot Pickering Planning & Devebpment Department.
Pianning lnformation Services Mapping and Design, July 6. 2012.
c�� �� Report to � �
'' Committee af A" m n
, d j ust e t
RI Application Number: P/CA 43l12
Meeting Date: July 25, 2012
From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principa! Planner — Qevelopment Re�iew
Subject: Committee af Adjustment Application P/CA 43/12
T. & H. Somwaru
S28 Sunbird Trail
(Part Lot 69, Plan 40M-22Q$, Part 8, 40R-23011)
City of Pickering
Application:
The applicant requests refief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 6176I03
to permit a rear yard depth of 3.8 metres to a covered deck attached to the rear of the
exist�ng detached dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of
7. � metres.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for
the rear yard deck and cover. �
Recornmendation:
The PJanning 8� Development Department considers the rear yard depth of 3.8 metres
to a covered deck attached to the rear of the exist�ng detached dwelling ta be a major
variance tha# is not desirable for the apprapriate development af the land, and not in
keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law, and #herefore
recommends Refusa� of the praposed variance.
Comment:
afficial Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering OffrcEa! Plan —"Urban Residential Area — Low Density Area" within Amberlea
Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 3036 as amended by By-law 6176I03 —"S-SD-3"
Report PICA 43112
s�
Appropriaieness of the Applicatian
July 25, 2012
Page 2
•#he inten# of the minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metre is to ensure that a
useable amenity space is provided in the rear yard and to provide an
appropriate buffe� space between buifdings and structures
• the prapvsed rear yard depth af 3.8 metres would nat maintain an adequate
arneni#y space in the rear of the subject property
• the proposed covered deck does nat provide adequate buffering beiween
buildings and structures
• afthough the existing dweiEing front elevatian #acing Sunbird Trail would be
unchanged, this property is a camer lot and therefore the proposed covered
deck would change the side elevatEOn facing Sunbird Trail which would be out
of character with the neighbourhood
• the intent of the zoning by-law would not be maintained
Date of report: July 18, 24�2
Comments prepared by:
��.�*
Mila Yeung
Planner II
MY:RP:Id
J'1COFAY2eporls12a12tpce a1 t2 Aoc
Enclosures
� �
Rass Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner — Development Review
.�
%
�
�
.�
,
�nformation Compiled from Applicant's
Submitted Plan
P1CA 43112
T. � H. Somwaru
To permit a rear yard
depth of 3.8 metres
� � �
0�
F
�� �� �/I
'� l/
�V
PRflPQSED , /�
� COVERED� � Q
� DECK � � %`
�� ' y� � ?�
�- �`,l �s'� /�
.
- \ �� \
� .
�ti � � � �
�, � , EXISTING � �
�.`�5�,� � BUI�DING �
� ', �
.
. �.
�� ' ,
`\ `\
� �,
.,\ �
�
. ,
,
� �� ' . ':
.
�.
�
�
.. ,��,`� P�
�� ��
.� . Q
l° �
��
��
�
�
0
This map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning 8 Development Department.
Pl2nning InfOrm2Gort Services Mapping and Design, July 5. 2012.
PROPOSED
COVERED
DEC
_ .s
,�.,
Information Compifed from Applicant's
Submitted P[an
P1CA 43112
T. 8� M. Somwaru
/`\.
/
% �\
�,
�
f' -- --
I . __ - �-.:%� �- . �y ;
-- ---... ..
. . / ..` .. . .. --�--..
' � PROPOSED DECK �''��
I ./ `'�-
.;
E " �
} _ __..._.__ _ . _ ._... __ . . ... ;:,.
� . . : , :;
� ���� t , . 'i �' ,
� :! I i ; �� ;�
' � .._.. . I � � , .
�
�,
.,
._,�------_._-_ �.. _..--- ---
. . . . . ....�_ _� _ _ _ . .. _ ._. . : .:
; _.. . _. ___._. .. ._ .. __.. —._ _. . - - �---_.._ _1
REAR ELEVATlON
s, —
�- �s _ i
_� �
-- -\-�--- . ______
�. . ` .._..
,._ .:..__--.--
_ _ -= ��
�
��� �
� �t � ►.,� ..� � �_ _ - � . _ f � r�
��''�I �� R �
� � 1 ��.
.— 3 �f���` _ �—'—�
�^'.�'�, ��� ��'. �� ' ' � -.��� F _ � _� 7.
�y. � .' s � ' �....' �.. �
��`�� --� � - � _ _ --
, *_ �.
��
: � __
. ___--�..— ._ �- _�� = _ ��
f-�-4.$m—►
SIDE ELEVATION
��
7his mep was produced by the Ciry o( Pickering Planning 8 Development Depanment.
Planning Informatian Services Mapping and Design, July 5. 2012.
��
Ci� a� Report to
' ; Committee of Adjustment
Application Number: PICA 44/12
Meeting Date: Ju1y 25, 2012
From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Pl�nner — Development Review
Subject: Committee af Adjustment Application P/CA 44/12
C. 8� K. Coppolino
936 Redbird Crescent
(Block 226, Plan 40M-1325, Part af Black 63, Plan 40M-1415,
Parts 5, fi, 25, 26, 28, 40R-989�}
City of Pickering
Application:
The applicants reguest relief frarn Zaning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1998185
ta permit a rear yard depth of 4.0 metres ta an existing deck and to permit a rear yard
depth of 4.Q metres ta a propvsed roof covering the existing deck attached to an
existing dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres.
�he appE�cants request approval of these variances in order to obtain zoning compliance
far #he existing deck and a building permit for the proposed roof_
Recommendation:
The Planning & Development Department considers the rear yard depth of 4.0 metres
to an existing rear yard deck and a proposed roof covering t�e existin� deck to be minor
variances that are desirabie for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping
with the general intent and purpose af the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and
therefore reeammends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the fol[owing
conditions:
That these va�iances apply only to the existing rear deck and proposed roof
covering the existing decic, as generally sited and outlined on the applicants'
submitted plans.
2. That the applicants obtain a buifding permit for the proposed canstruction by
July 25, 2�14, or this decision shall become null and void.
Report P/CA 44i12
Comment:
Q�cia� Plan and Zoning By-law
au�y 2�, za�z
P�zge 2 r �
Pickering Official Plan — tJrban Residential, Low Density Areas within the Liverpool
Neighbourhaod
Zoning By-law 3036 as amended by By-law 1998I85 —"S-SD" — Single Detached and
Semi-Detachec� Residential Zone
Appropriateness of the Application
Rear Yard Depth Varianee
• the intent of the minimum 7.5 metre rear yard depth is to ensure that a useable
amenity space +s pravided in the rear yard and to provide an appropriate buffer
space between dwellirtgs on abutting properties
• the uncovered deck cUrrently exists on the subject property
� the lot is irregularly-shaped
• sufficient amenity area wili be provided Qn the property since the deck and
proposed roof covering tapers away from both the rear and east side property
lanes
• the height of the proposed deck is approximately 0.6 m�tres above grade
• an appropriate buffer space between dwellings will be maintained
• provided that the structure is nQt enclosed, tl�e intent of the zoning by-law would
be maintained_
Input From Qther Sources
The applicants submitted a form letter with their appEication t�at was signed by
32 residents in s�pport of the requested proposed roof co�ering over the existing deck.
Qate of report: July 18, 24i2
Co ts prepared by:
•-kt\�cZ'� � �#.£,wr�r.(
� Ashiey e ood, MCIP PP
rif�
AY: RP: Ed
J:KAFA1Repo�sl2otY+pca s472.doc
Enclosures
o� �°�
Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Pianner — Development Review
Information Compiled frvm Applicant's
Submitted Plan
PICA 44112
C. & K. Coppolino
PROPC}SED
COVERED`
DECK
' F� '�',- .�s�n
�e/
�O � • .
���
s��
�T
��
�
This map was praduced by Ihe City of Pickering Planning & Development Oapartment.
Planning lntormation Services Mapping and Design, July 6. 2012.
Information Compiled frvm Applicant's
�±� Submitted Plan
PICA 44112
C. $� K. Coppolino
s_._ ____---�---- -__ ..--- -
I
? WINOOW
1
PRaPOSED ! �
°�-- ----- 5.6m_....^..._.__.- -----� a�
ROQF �
�..1... ._..._. ._..� ��--�- � �__.___`__'__,�f,..��__-_-�--.-_._-; —�
F--- I �- j, � r �� I
' � � �1 k ; � ;
EXISTiNG ; ; . � �2.2m � ;
DECK : { � � � .
� ti , � ;
, ,
;; �
� ` � ��._ �----� . -
s_ _ `.�--;:_.__ _'�.— ..—_ --' - '�- ;
--� _��----__...__...^ -- I
;
: .:,._..,.... :_�. . r._..._ .. ..... _ _ ._-___... .. . _ .. � .
. . . . i � ._; .,,
. _- — .... .... .. ..... . ... ... ,
�..._i -- �
�
4.9rri
i_ _ ....
I
2.9+�
,
I�
� � _.�..
� ;<i - � ----
�� .. --
f:
REAR ELEVATION
���
- :;�--,:- --�
w{: 1
Y : I
f` '�2.2m
�-. ...__.._ �il;�r�
i
;
SIDE ELEVATION
,�
� -.__ -.---.--,:.._.. - - --
3.5m
This map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning & Development Deparimen{,
Planning Intormalion Services Mapping and Design, Jrsly fi. 2Q12.
��w�� Repart to
I" I
��
Committee of Adjustment
��
Application Number: P/CA 45112
Meeting Date: July 25, 2Q�2
From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
P�incipal Rlanner — De�elapment Re�iew .
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/GA 45112
K. Selimovski
17�G Woodview Avenue
(Lot �7, Plan 4QM-'i682)
City of Pickering
Application:
The appficant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3Q36 ta permit a rear yard depth of
6.0 metres #o a praposed 2 storey deck onto the rear of the existEng detached dwelling,
to permit a totaf lot coverage af 37 percent and to recognize a west rear yard depth of
0.4 metr�s and a south side yard width of 0.2 metres to an existing shed, whereas the
by-law requires a minirr�um rear yard depth of 7.5 metres, a maximum lot caverage of
33 percent and a minimum of 1.0 metres setback to all lot lines for all accessory
structures.
The applicant requests appro�al of these variances in order to obtain a building permit
for the propased 2 storey deck and zoning compliance far the existing shed.
RecommendatEOn:
The Planning 8� De�elopment Department considers a rear yard depth of 6.Q metres to
a proposed 2 storey deck, a total lot coverage of 37 percent and a west rear yard depth
of 0.4 metres and a south side yard width of 0.2 metres to an existing shed to be minor
variances that are desirable for the appropriate de�elopment of the land, and in keeping
w�th the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and
therefore recomrnends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following
canditions:
1. That these variances apply only ta the existing shed and the �roposed 2 starey
deck, as generally sited and outlined an the applicant's submitted plans.
2. That the appiicant obtain a building permit for the pr�pased 2 starey deck by
July 25, 2014, c�r this decision shall become null and void.
Report PICA 45/12
.fuly 25, 2012
7 � . Page 2
Backgraund:
Since the public notice, Staff identifred that the�e is an existing shed located on the
praperty. The applicant therefore, arnended the application ta reflect the location of the
shed and the increase in totaE !ot coverage to 37 percent, whereas the o�iginal application
was to permit a lot coverag� of 3� percent. The applicant requests approval for the minor
variances in or�er to obtain zoning compliance respecting the existing shed.
• �C�T'i iTiT��
C}fficial Plan and Zoning By-law
Pickering Official Rlan —"Urban Residential Area — l.ow Density Area" — within the
Rougemount Neighbaurhood
Zoning By-law 3036 — "R4"
ApproprFateness of the Applicativn
Rear Yard Variance
• the intent of the minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres to ensure that a useable
amenity space is �rovided in the rear yard
� the proposed rear yard depth of 6.0 metres will maintain adequate amenity space
in the rear yard of the subject property
• there appears to be no adverse impact on the surraunding properties
• the intent of the zoning by-law would be rnaintained
Lot Coverage Variance
• the intent of a maximum lot co�erage of 33 percent is to maintain an appropriate
amount of yard space (amenity area} uncovered by buildings on a iot and to
regulate the maximum size and mass of buildings on a lot
• the propQSed lot coverage of 37 percent provides adequate amenity area
un�overed by buildings and provides an acceptable amount of building massing on
a corner lot
the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained
Accessory Structure Setback Variance
the intent of the zoning by-law requiring accessory structures that are larger than 10
square metres to be 1.0 metre setback fram lot lines is to ensure that adequate
maintenance access is available to the sides of the structures, ensure that the
eaves do not encroach on t�e adjacent properties, ensure roof drainage stays on
the subject praperty, and to minimize the visual impact that their location may ha�e
on adjacent properties
Report P/CA 45/'t 2
July 25, 2Q12
Page 3 '� ?
• the existing west setbacks of 0.4 metres and south setback of 0.2 metres #o the
existing shed is an existing situatio� that has r�ot negativeiy impact adjacent
properties as it has been existing for numeraus years
• there have been no complaints regarding the roof drainage, maintenance and
visua! impact of the existing shed affecting abutting proper#ies
• the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained
input From �ther Saurces
Development Control
5 neighbouring residents at:
396, 397 8� 398 Hogarth Street
1754 & 1758 Woodview Avenue
1 neighbouring resider�t a#:
1754 Woodview Avenue
Date of repart: July 18, 2012
Camments prepared by:
����4�
Mi(a Yeung
Planner II
MY:RP:Itf
JtCOFAVie{rorts12017�yca 45��2.doc
Enclosures
• all runoff from starm events mus� be
contained on the applicant's property
• no objectian to the proposed 2 storey
deck
• no cancern with the existing shed
� �
Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principai Planner — De�elopment Re�iew
? �,
��
�
Q
INE �
z--rr'1 �
_'_
�
��
����
TWYN RIV�RS
STREET
IAR CRT.
QR1VE
W
7
Z
W
>
Q
�
w
>
0
O
0
3
w
>
�
n
Y
Q
O
�
t
f
,
lNESTCREEK � PARK
PUBUC SCHOOL
iWYN
;''� 1"'1111,
1 • �I� ��1""'
�
��, - _I
�j 1�11
, ��111r�== =i
. � .'�i� =
:Ilt��= =I
-1������111=:;1
RIVERS
- ��s��.�� ■��, �����■i � '
; i� �� � � �
�� � ����� ! ��������
� �� �� �����.:' ��� . -. .
��sr�■rr� �r�� J�.�■���■
`""/F� - �ITTLEFORD
O,Q�L o �
F
` a
� ROUGE � p
City of Pickering Planning & Devekopment Department
PROPERTY DESGRIPTION Lot 17, Plan 40M-� 692 �
OWNER K. Selimovski DATE Jufy 3, 2012 DRAWN BY JB
FI�E No. P/CA 45j12 SCALE 1;6,000 CHECKED BY MY N
°"'�°" PN-11
e T�ronet Cnt�ryrt��� InC. on0 lt• �VDDll�re. All ApAt� R�s�rved. Not a Plon W�u'YI�r.
p ZO14 MPAC and its �uppttrrs. NI Aphb R�s�rv�0. Not a plan o} Survry. __. __
To perrnit a rear yard
depth of 6.0 metres
6.Om
�
0
� EXISTING
SHED
m } �
�
. + � .
E
N
O
To permit a sauth side
yard widfh af 0.2
metres and a west rear
yard depth of Q.4
metres
Information Compiled from Applicant's
Submitted Plan
PICA 45112
K. Selimovski
HOGARTH STREET
�
' 2s.�m � `
�
� �
3.6m _,_, � ,_,� � � — ,,,�
..► � �
� �
PROPOSED` �
� z sraR�Y � EXISTING f,,. � �
`° oECK � 2 STOREY ��j� 7 6m
�
� QWELLING I
� i
{�
3.6m """ r"" �"'i I
� � ..-... �. -- --+- --�-at-- 7.6m
31.8m - . _
To perrnit a total lot
coverage of 37 percent
'1 �
� r L1.J
�
Z
�
Q
�
w
� �
Q
� �0
� O
�
ihis map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning & Developmen[ Qepartment.
Planning Information $ervices Mapping and Design. July 10. 2012.
r� �
Information Compiled from Applicant's
Submitted Plan
PlCA 451'! 2
K. SelimaWS�Ci
3.Gm
. �
:.i�_� . .. . . �. i E ;
. y ..
. : . . : ,_ . ' . :' ' ._. ... „
._.. 3-, ,'f
V � , .
z Z
�, J
� � �
w ,t,
� p � • - _ _. - _ „�.- . - . �---�r
,.: _ __ . __. .._.__._....._... _. .. . ..... .._�
SIQE ELEVATIDN
�:
E
�
� 4
: '.
i!
, �
� ........... _.i i ...
.. _ ...
1- -
9.6m
,;
i. �
i�
. . i'
�.
�
�
�
_ ._ ..._._ . .. .. ... . ,
� ,
i�
._ . �. `�. .
. �'
,,
i ; � ! �
� 5 � ._' ........ _ .-. . , �i ,
: 7
� � �
I 1—�.� . , - _ .. ---------�' �
�- -
, ., : .
, .
,.�. __ . .__ . .. .. _ . _� �
__
; �--. _ _ ------...._... _._ _. .. .... _ ._�
�
_ . ._�
REAR ELEVATI�N
This map was produced by the City ol Pickering Ptanning & Development Qepartment.
Planning I�ormation Services Mappng and Design, July 10, 2072