Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOctober 13, 2010, t,:,.,�c������.i —. ,�.,... a::.�� �,.��.�� ��� �� (I) Adoption of Agenda Committee of Adjustment Agenda Wednesday, October 13, 2010 7:00 pm Main Committee Room Page Number (II) Adoption of Minutes from September 22, 2010 1-9 (III) Reports 1. (Deferred from September 22, 2010) 10-27 P/CA 32/10 — R. & N. Armstrong 1434 Rougemount Drive (Part of Lot 17, Plan 228, Part 3, 40R-16847) City of Pickering 2. P/CA 35/10 — K. & M. Brown 834 Naroch Blvd. (Lot 257, Plan M14) City of Pickering 3. P/CA 36/10 — G. & T. Abdee 1773 Central Street ELot 37 & 38, Plan 43) City of Pickering 28-32 33-36 4. P/CA 37/10 — D. Donato & P. Bonavitacola 37-42 1910 Pine Grove Avenue (Part Lot 26, Plan 329) City of Pickering (IV) Adjournment ACCeSSible For information related to accessibility requirements please contact • Lesley Dunne P I C K E(�N G T. 905.420.4660, extension 2024 TTY 905.420.1739 Email Idunne@cityofpickering.com . , -- N �_���i����� _— �a ,�,— , _..�, � �. _ ������_����� PENDING ADOPTION PRESENT: Kevin Ashe David Johnson — Chair Susan Kular Eric Newton — Vice-Chair ALSO PRESENT: Ross Pym, Secretary-Treasurer Lesley Dunne, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer ABSENT: Keith Wilkinson (I) ADOPTION OF AGENDA Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Susan Kular Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 22, 2010 7:00 pm Main Committee Room That the agenda for the Wednesday, September 22, 2010 meeting be adopted. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (II) ADOPTION OF MINUTES Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Susan Kular That the minutes of the 12th meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, September 1, 2010 be adopted as amended. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 1 �� . • ' • � � �� __ i • �r a=i.�r€����.'��. � _—.,_ �� . ��„T �'-'s-�"".� «a� � ' � � . • � � - 1 1 _���_�.�!��_'�� 11 • • '�• (III) REPORTS P/CA 30/10 — D. Rinneard 5034 Wixson Street (Lot 6, South Part Lot 7, 8, Plan 12) City of Pickering The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037 to permit a detached garage partially located within a side yard, to permit a front yard depth of 5.8 metres to the existing dwelling and to permit a front yard porch encroachment of 1.8 metres, whereas the by-law requires accessory structures to be located in the rear yard, a minimum front yard depth of 9.0 metres and a maximum front yard encroachment of 1.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain zoning compliance and a building permit to renovate and extend the existing detached garage. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from Councillor Rick Johnson in support of the application. Written comments were also received from the Durham Region Health Department expressing no objection to the application however once the permit application is received it will be assessed for compliance with the 2006 Ontario Building Code. Duff Rinneard, owner, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Duff Rinneard explained the application and submitted a letter of support from Chris Kellar of 5022 Wixson Street. Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Susan Kular That application P/CA 30/10 by D. Rinneard, be Approved on the grounds that the existing detached accessory building partially located in the side yard, a front yard depth of 5.8 metres to an existing dwelling, and an existing 1.8 metre porch encroachment into a front yard are minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: `a C�� o� Committee of Adjustment ��� Meeting Minutes � � Wednesday, September 22, 2010 �� 7:00 pm Main Committee Room 1. That these variances apply only to the existing structures, as generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs submitted plans with this application. 2. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by September 21, 2012 or this decision shall become null and void. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 2. P/CA 31/10 — 1262847 Ontario Ltd. 3260 3280 Highway 7 (Part of Lot 3, Concession 6) City of Pickering The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 2623/87 to recognize as a permitted use an existing 375 square metre vehicle repair shop (Meineke Car Care Centre) within a portion of an existing building and to permit the remaining portion (655 square metres) to be used for a foam insulation establishment with accessory indoor storage, whereas the by-law only permits a vehicle sales or rental establishment as a permitted use. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain zoning compliance. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval for the existing repair shop subject to conditions and refusal for the proposed foam insulation establishment. Written comments were received from Councillor Rick Johnson in support of the application. Written comments were received from the Durham Region Health Department expressing no objection with the application. Written comments were also received from Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority expressing no objection to the application and noted the ownedapplicant be advised that prior to any development on the site within regulated areas, written permission from the Authority is required. David Grant, owner, Grant Morris, agent, were present to represent the application. Kevin Wright of 3260 Hwy 7 and Phillip Ayliffe of 3280 Hwy 7 were present in favour of the application. David Grant explained the insulation company is a community oriented company, will be an economic benefit to the area, will function similar to a flooring and carpet use, will have a showroom, eco-friendly and will improve the subject property. .. -- . . �. „ .f • +�'., �� �i���� i �. - . � . - . � - 1 I �� _ - - - ._+a.� _.. .._� �� �/_�_��_I �� 1 1 � . • - - ' � � Grant Morris provided his opinion that the Committee has the ability to approve the requested variances, provided an explanation of the operation of the business, and the application meets all the tests of the Planning Act. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Grant Morris noted the Committee has already added a carpet use on the subject property and the requested variance is very similar. Moved by Kevin Ashe Seconded by Susan Kular That application P/CA 31/10 by 1262847 Ontario Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the existing 375 square metre vehicle repair shop is a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance applies only to the eastern section of the west building (3260 Highway 7), as generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs submitted plans with this application. 2. That only one vehicle repair shop (as a principle use) is permitted on the subject property. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY Moved by Kevin Ashe Seconded by Susan Kular That application P/CA 31/10 by 1262847 Ontario Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the proposed foam insulation establishment with accessory indoor storage is a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the O�cial Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: That the owner submits an application to the City of Pickering to amend the zoning by-law for the subject property within two years from the date of the decision or this decision shall become null and void. MOTION LOST 0 � . "'- • ' • � � � � a�����`���'�i —�■ ' • � . ' � • ' 1 1 y - • _. - — ���_/_���.I�� 11 � • t t - • � � � 11 Moved by David Johnson Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 31/10 by 1262847 Ontario Ltd., be Deferred to the next meeting to conduct a site visit and to obtain additional information for the foam insulation establishment. MOTION LOST The Chair adjourned for an in-camera session. The Committee adjourned at 7:45 pm. The Committee reconvened at 7:50 pm. Moved by David Johnson Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 31/10 by 1262847 Ontario Ltd be moved to the last item on the agenda. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY The Committee resumed discussion on P/CA 31/10 at 8:30 pm. In response to a question from a Committee Member, David Grant provided a detailed explanation of the functionality of the foam insulation establishment. Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Susan Kular That application P/CA 31/10 by 1262847 Ontario Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the proposed foam insulation establishment with accessory indoor storage is a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: That the approval of this variance be for a two year period from the date of this decision and on September 24, 2012 this decision shall become null and void and that the owner submit an application to amend the zoning by-law for the subject property. 2. That a minimum of 20 percent of the gross leasable floor area of the insulation establishment be for retail/showroom purposes. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 5 . _ , ,��,_ �a_�,,�tl»� i _—. - _ , s _"'`�..�.� � �.���1������ 3. P/CA 32/10 — R. & N. Armstrong 1434 Rougemount Drive (Part of Lot 17, Plan 228, City of Pickering Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, September 22, 2010 7:00 pm Part 3, 40R-16847) Main Committee Room The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2912/88 to permit a proposed attached private garage to extend a maximum of 9.6 metres beyond the front wall of an existing dwelling, whereas the by-law does not permit any attached private garage to extend more than 2.0 metres beyond the front wall of the dwelling. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were also received from Gino Hamparian of 1432 Rougemount Drive in objection to the application. Correspondence received from Gino Hamparian expressed several concerns with the size and orientation of the proposed garage, the location of the garage will be blocking two large windows of a home o�ce, it is not in keeping with the previously established architecture of the street and will have a negative impact on his property. Robert Armstrong, owner, was present to represent the application. Gino Hamparian of 1432 Rougemount Drive was present in objection to the application. Robert Armstrong explained the proposed garage will be in character with the surrounding neighbourhood and blend with the existing dwelling. In response to a question from a Committee Member Gino Hamparian indicated to the Committee were the two windows are on his property that would be blocked by the proposed garage. Moved by Eric Newton Seconded by Susan Kular That application P/CA 32/10 by R. & N. Armstrong, be Deferred until the next meeting in order to give the Committee Members an opportunity to visit the site. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 0 � ' • � • �� " n • ��°_-,=�u�� _I� 1 -., ,.,,. � . � ..�, � _� - � • . - • � - 1 1 - r �__ .�.� � _�_���._�_��.'�\ 11 � - • - - ' � • 4. P/CA 33/10 — T. & S. O'Gorman 537 Mountain Ash Drive (Lot 47 Plan 40M-1866) City of Pickering The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511 to permit two accessory structures located within a side yard, whereas the by-law requires accessory structures to be located in the rear yard. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to construct two small sheds adjacent to the side wall of the house. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Supervisor, Building Permits expressing the accessory structures will require a building permit if attached to the main dwelling or if greater than 10 square metres in area. Written comments were also received from the City's Development Control Manager expressing the relief requested should not be permitted as the proposed accessory structures would be located within a storm sewer easement. Shaun & Teresa O'Gorman, owners, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Shaun O'Gorman explained the application and noted they are aware the accessory buildings should be on a moveable platform. In response to a question from a Committee Member the Secretary-Treasurer explained the comments received from the City's Supervisor, Building Permits and highly recommend the accessory buildings be built on a moveable platform. Moved by Kevin Ashe Seconded by Eric Newton That application P/CA 33/10 by T. & S. O'Gorman, be Approved on the grounds that the proposed accessory buildings located in the side yard is a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 7 C�� o� Committee of Adjustment ��� Meeting Minutes Q� _ �- � Wednesday, September 22, 2010 7:00 pm Main Committee Room 1. That this variance applies only to the proposed structures, as generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs plans submitted with this application. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY P/CA 34/10 — G. & A. Lomer 179 Thicket Crescent (Lot 54, Plan 40M-1778) City of Pickering The applicants request relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 4271/93 to permit a 0.3 metre side yard width to an existing gazebo and 0.5 metre side yard width to an existing shed, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard width of 1.0 metre for all accessory structures. The applicants request approval of this variance in order to obtain zoning compliance. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from Councillor Rick Johnson in support of the application. Eleven form letters were also received from surrounding neighbours indicating no objections to the structures located in the rear yard of the subject property. Gord & Anita Lomer, owners, were present to represent the application. Melissa Hillier of 1726 Ada Court and Jeff Lomer of 177 Whilshire Drive were present in support of the application and both indicated the property is well maintained, provides additional privacy and enhances the neighbourhood. Steve & Wanda Trandovski of 177 Thicket Crescent were present in objection to the application. Gord & Anita Lomer explained the application and provided four additional support form letters from surrounding neighbours and also provided pictures for the Committee to review. Steve & Wanda Trandovski expressed concerns that the gazebo roof and the shed are too close to the fence, and that the resulting roof drainage will land in their yard. � • ' • � • •� '= x J� � �a_°i-�u�1 m�-,nl�� z.. a -, .— ,�_i� Y �:�:d.�!. ' � • . ' • � ' 1 1 r_-�-., _�_�1� /_���I�� 11 • • '�• Moved by Kevin Ashe Seconded by Susan Kular That application P/CA 34/10 by G. & A. Lomer, be Approved on the grounds that the 0.3 metre and 0.5 metre side yard width to an existing rear yard gazebo and shed are minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: That these variances applies only to the existing gazebo and shed, as generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs submitted plans with this application. 2. That the applicant provides a gutter and ensures that rainwater runoff from the gazebo and shed roof is contained on the subject property. 3. That the applicant contacts the Planning & Development Department to arrange for an inspection of the gazebo and to confirm that the requirements of condition 2 have been satisfied by March 22, 2011 or this decision shall become null and void. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (I� ADJOURNMENT Moved by Susan Kular Seconded by Eric Newton That the 13th meeting of 201 D the Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 8:45 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, October 13, 2010. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY Date Chair Assistant Secretary-Treasurer � , �..��,_����, _- :: s- L._ .,n r._.c-..r � ����■�\_ � �� Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 32/10 Meeting Date: October 13, 2010 (Deferred at the September 22, 2010 meeting) From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner—Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 32/10 R. & N. Armstrong 1434 Rougemount Drive (Part of Lot 17, Plan 228, Part 3, 40R-16847) City of Pickering Application: The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2912/88 to permit a proposed attached private garage to extend a maximum of 9.6 metres beyond the front wall of an existing dwelling, whereas the by-law does not permit any attached private garage to extend more than 2.0 metres beyond the front wall of the dwelling. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit. Recommendation: The Planning & Development Department considers the 9.6 metre private garage extension beyond the front wail of the existing dwelling to be a minor variance that is desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variance, subject to the foilowing conditions: That this variance applies only to the proposed private garage extension, as generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs submitted plans with this application that includes the garage doors perpendicular to the front lot line and a residential fapade on the wall facing the street. 2. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by October 12, 2012, or this decision shall become null and void. 3. That the applicant ensures that living space above the garage (with contiguous access into the existing building) is provided as part of its construction or this decision shall become null and void. Report P/CA 32/10 (Deferred at the September 22, 2010 meeting) Background: October 13, 2010 Page 2 � � the subject application was deferred at the September 22, 2010 Committee of Adjustment meeting to give the Committee of Adjustment Members an opportunity to visit the site Comment: O�cial Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering O�cial Plan —"Urban Residential — Low Density Area" within the Rougemount Neighbourhood Zoning By-law — 3036 as amended by By-law 2912/88 —"R3" — Single Residential Zone Appropriateness of the Application • the intent of the maximum 2.0 metre garage projection requirement is to encourage a style of development on the subject properties which is similar and compatible with existing development on Rougemount Drive by preventing the establishment of an attached garage significantly projecting beyond the front of the dwelling • the intent is also to maintain adequate buffer space between structures on a property and street activity, as well as avoiding adverse impact on the streetscape • dwellings along Rougemount Drive generally consists of a variety of custom built homes on large lots • the applicant has proposed an addition which consists of living space above the garage, accessible from the existing building • the proposed orientation of the garage doors in addition to residential floor space above the garage will blend in with the original building • proposed windows facing Rougemount Drive wili also minimize the appearance of an extended garage projection • the subject property is heavily vegetated which screens out surrounding neighbours • the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Input From Other Sources Gino Hamparian . opposed to the application 1432 Rougemount Drive (see attached letter) Report P/CA 32/10 (Deferred at the September 22, 2010 meeting) l� Date of report: October 6, 2010 Comments prepared by: �� ` « shle ea ood Planner I AY:RP:Id wiarreoortarzoimpu3z-io- oeie�ree.aoc Enclosures October 13, 2010 Page 3 l��G/1�0 �� ROSS Py111, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner— Development Review 13 1� � r Information Compiled from Applicants Submitted plan P/CA 32/10 R. 8 N. Armstrong E � 94.1m `y EXISTING DWELLING ""I f__ 94.1 m To permit a proposed attached garage to extend a maximum of 9.6 metres beyond the front wall ot an existing dwelling PROPOSED 2 STOREY E � E 0 N W i � ❑ � � G W � � � � N This map wes producetl by the Gity M Pickering Planning & �evelopnent Depariment, Planning Iniarmation Sernces tlivision Mapping and Design, Sept 2, 201p. Information Compiled from Applicants Submitted plan , P/CA 32l10 R. & N. Armstrong �.,� I : ,` .� � ��-� ; .. . � .:-1'J��Y �°�a.J < 1 'i � � _ . . � . . . . . . . . � � �. � �7_._ ....... . -':.'.'. FRONT __� I, � � —')'i^� � " �_ i � ___ �/ \ _� �_ �� .. � � . � / � I � / .- ` \` . _.. _.:�_ ," � .� � '- . . ------_— � �� ' j \,. � � � i : '�� �----- / \ � � ❑��Q ❑��❑ . . k .. �'� � � � � t. � � � � .' : . . � . . �_'- ..�-�-.__ �� -__ . . _...: __,__.. . . _ .. . .:_. _. '_ - __-_`_ _' SIOE NcN EMIa IYG l� N This map was producetl by the Ci�y ot Pickering Planc�ng 8 Development Oepatlmm[, � Planning Information Servires tlivisbn Mapping antl Design, Sept 2, 20tC. �� City of Yzckering Ylanning � UeF�eiepment Department One The Esplanade Pickering, Ontario L 1 �� 5k;7 ATTE?�TION: Secretarv-Treasurer September 27, ?QIU SUBJECT: Pi�A 32/10 — R. & N. Aanstron� 1434 Rougemount Dnve Yart of lot 17,- Ylan 22$, Yart 3, 4�1Z-1bx47 City nf 1'ickering This appli: arion is coming back to the Committee of.4djustment in 3 weeks rime R I felt iY imPort.ant to add t� the comments i submitted earlier. This applica+��n r;z*:s contra�y to by-law ainendinent 2912!8R, that was enac:ed to restrict ±he prohusion of an attached garage and maiut�� some control on developmenY ou 1ie sheet. The au2endment was passed in 1988 after a lengfliy study by tl�e City Planning Dept thaY ident4fied muque characterisrics tliat were felt to Ue des�ralle and shouid be preserved. The proposed addibon is innre than a niere garage, rt�s more li#e an additional dwelling. 1'he proposal requests substantially more than a minor vaziance. Every new l�uilding since the vnendment was passed has conformed to the maximum 2A metre gazage protrusion. There may t+e minor variations sich as 2.5 or 3.0 metres, certain!y none were 4:6 metres as this applicatinn requests. There are no 2 stnrey garages on the streeY. Except for homes built before the by-law, ail garaoes ha��e been incorporated into the main structure. The gazane af my hause, 1432 Rau�e�naunt extends 4.fi metres past the fionY of't�ie house. It was built pnor to the by-iaw change in i988. My house 8c the oue umnediately to the south were the catalysts for an�ending the by-law in ly$8. If the extension of'iny garage was deemed "unsightly" ui ly2iiS at 4.6 metres, how is it thaY y.6 mehes is not deemed "unsightiy" now? Why bother then with a by-law? There is no prece,cient for this variavice. 1 here are other candidates for possible recievelopment on the street. Granting this variance will set that precedent for otbers. It ti��ii undo �II the effort of tt�e past 20 yeazs to maintain the unique smFChue on this stceek TMe zar,:r.g ch; n�es in ! 98Q :ti-� e appe�le� ta the �Jr�.t�ro ?�".:;nicipal 8es: d�vith :he deci�ion he=^b i.^. *.h_ �'i ,•'s fa�-eua. One can aonclude then that these measures were found to he des'vable. There is truly no other s+seet like this iv Pickerin�. The by-laws aclueved die desixed result i�n not opposed to a garage on.the site. What J a�� opposed to ic the locaYion �f the adcl�tinn. in that it �il �,�.0 ht��ti rhP �nt„ '� �r»n���s on that side of ttie heuse. �he applicant has saverai G�BS1gII 4�Y!OPC 2V3L?�12'i�'�LI? 1 b2V? IlO^�. The}' �V£ S2`.'�TS�. q�,+?I�?LS iQ 3�2012?R i�'C C?:t:PS?.O^ 50 as nnt te rl���: these uinde�s. 'rBey can change the orientatien so that r�+P g�ra�P doers f2cP ilae s::eet :r.s:ead of 40 degrees to it. They Lave tha o�:ion of gatting li'te ��rage cn'ha aart�'� side cf the prt��;,rt}�. Th� l:a�� ihe optior. af revertin�! to the or.ginal design af :he h; use if-hich :��as a g,�raae where the eurrent kitchen is loeated. Some sort of co2npro:nise is required. A 2 sYorey struciure ��ill eiuninatc any kia�l ofpri�acj� i may haee. es it is, the:e is !:vi�.dow i.� theu-h�ase El�at overlaaks m}� rear yaad. I was willu�� to ac:cept this when we locate3 ouF house as � cemproittse for ihe �nte� of noY has�ing my sicle �k•indows blocked by a garage in the future. A south etevation was not subtnitted H ifh the agplication. 'i here is a very good chance that therP �% wili be windox�s along this secrion c� they wiii ali overlook my rear yard. Surely there has To he some criteria for renavation / additions so that they do not interfere with or negativeiy affect adjacent buildings. The applicant commented that his application wili whance property value. As the ap�lication exists, it will mal:e my propVrty less desirable. l liave included some photo�'aphs of the properties I re%ired to iu my original submission. There are uo 2 storey �arages on this street similar ta the application. They are al► sutgie store�� Sz do not inteii8re with acijacent buiidings. I:72 Ftougemount: buift pnor to the current by-law, snigle storey 1393 Rougemount: a new home 6iuli after the by-law was passed, siugle storey, does not really obsriuct the adjacent �roperty by virtue of separation. 1396 Rougemount: a renovation after the by-law was passed, single storey, does not really obstruct die adlacent properry. This renovarion �eplaced a building in d�e same location. 4Vhatever obshuction there may be cm�reutly, it existed prior to the reno��arion. 141(1 fic t431 Itougemount: two new ho�nes built after the bylaw was passed, gazage incorporated inYo the main shuciure. Garage does not protrude more than 2.0 meh�es fiem the face of the inain building. 1435 Ro�gemoimt: bttilt p:ior ta the current by-law, single storey &�a°.s not abst^sct or :r,ter vre ��7Yh th� adjacent proFerty. The a3jaoen2 building was sited te avoid ohstructio.^.s. 1458 Rougeanount: a new ho�e built after the by-!aw was rasse3, �yz�e ^�c:�ora*.�d �ntn ±he maui str�� ��'e. Ga*a�e does aot greff�zde more than 2.D metres fiom Lee face ef t1!e m�i �!ilding. I also inetude a sketch of the impact of such an additinn would have on iny residence whicl? I �onsider Yo be a huge infiision.. (Y�nQ T-j�nir�,nan 1432 Rouae!uountIhive Pickering, Ontario L1V 1NI 13 �; �S��OH �NI1�IX� � 0 �� �Xhihii i �. °3 �� - ^! ; .p a -_: i' �'F 1,4a fi :i _ � �� y +#g�_�' . '';� �`s'�n��S �',� •#t,. � �'� � ! x+y°'E�� `��� � � �� ,,.tr� � � ���sb s ! ; "' �: i j �f - � # �} � � ��' 6 �l t + � +� • � Q � � � ` � � � t�� r � `, '� r��. n �\�, � �� 3��� , � ; t �. �� �.' � f �/ i O� � �4' � � �� � ���,`' ` • ��r�� di . � �� � � `MD 54 � �'k' k� .. i ; +� . � � � � "� . '' � ,�yi -r.' k ;; . :. ���:E:. A �I �� d . � � 1 pe d ay � ;,i. �4 �n� ; � Fi � >_ ir t� r �y 9 :�:r.' ����.�� t�s a.��°.. °,�' "��"��. a t �� r ] 'yr q� i 9 :� i � �C Rb t ai 4A5 ? lR �kxKavaV`W�9k e . '. � � rm� _. � � � � � � ����a�� ,���t����yk� ° �e'r�yi @; � i � u.k� '.K � �'j9�i � ��l..: � e� , :'�.. I �, 3 0 i Y�iii..{•�� 14 9y..e� j- ' q X l 7a4 e k : .Aa. , . -tl a '9 . ��.°„ . ..a... �;� . � h (,ppQ�,' 1 �� ' X 1 �'.....' i ...� � '� . , � i� s � a. ?' .�Y a<y ��' ,}� . �. � � � � , i ;Y , � ` �� 1 � `'tF _ .�N. � � i'f •:� `� (`�: '. i 6.. r� �' ) �� P � °Q s . ct , � S .`4 r - :� , _. , :±4 • f� . . . `y * .. J ��{, i� � T . �R� � � Y R S � � il . : �, � t. :� '_' F} 0 S�e t ���.�`k��," � '; �� .� �.�:;. � t� �s � � '"�,-M ti °� �*�,�� �� .. � �E . � "��� =KJ.: f , „. i!�• � ° f'f < ` `� � �s . �: �. ,�'� #�,r ;.- .�' � In� f-4 � ����. ' F � I{ji. y� � Y M' y .1 r; �' :��� �� z*,r a { ,�,�r �' h�i',y�K�.' . �1�zhz�:�•a; .? Trr�".'�:x :t : x '�'^ � � i� '"/� '�;' ',:,_ J�k ± ;� M M *,e'��� ,. 4 ��� � ' ' +�.?:. � s ` t �� �- � . r .:� . . � � ,-� '" 4 . � ' d. , �:: ,v ; �: R� �. Y ?a s.�+�` a S� . . •= ;,. . `' '_'<€ ` € ��f � � e ; �. i 3�.,; � � Kor �( '� �'S'� `I a F � 9•� L i� 1 `r :' i . � : + $ i �_ � . t � a fi�; � i �, � 9� � �t a' � J :� ; ��� ���� � � f�,. . !/ �+' . f (' � . � / �ff . � . �= S e : � , '1 ����`►I � � � �� � � 4 � � 1 � ' ; ' � � � � � � � 'i � � �I ♦-����� � � � � � � � ,.��� �� � I C �' �� � 4 �. +j�t C j � .�` , 6 i {, ., t ; � � +�: ""� .0 �`� � � �� I,!� � � �' � � �� , � � ' �� ' '{ . M,�.'��:S, . ��. L J! � , t1 � v^ .. �„�a� �i t � ' Y �I � � �� � � ? } � 1 i , t �— L..' r— � ir' f� + i �II ky3�"' � �� ��W.,.q � . ! . `;� _ , �.w � . � � � .� -� � _ �'-� :. ( « ; .-. . _.A ` } - ..�� ':, Y �L � ' ` �� . i �� c \ � '�' �� _ �� � �� �� _� �� .� � ; : �, �- �� �s�+'A+E': . . . . . . �b....�0+,s++�p ^E "���C'iY� rY�V Ca�' .'1 � ��� � a. � � � y���a ....' al--:..a'f1.�.4,' �.�. .- __... ':�.::..„r���'�°' . . r -:�.aaa . . . .. . - �- s�,-�;;..�. , „ ' .._ tl`L .. }W �. �"'R� . '— � `��. r+�. �.. .- C 'M •.i`� �... T � ��+�r��,}� � ���� �.. � � " �` �� ~ � .�-� ' �:1...no.ro�ex��`+�° . .,� � �s,� ,e :; a : , - � - .����� ��.3 f�� � ' ?� � -�, ,�, • .� .;; � x � .� ; � •� 3. s � �� t,� r v-s: 7�;v ���g� �� � '-�� • 'f�s�rt� - y �� `S Y �� 4 � S :1: � 3 �Y` 1� i. Er . �:� .. « ,'°A � .. �6'C. ` � � n� � �� v t i�.�: �� � ° . : 's 4 _ '� !�' , i �� - 4 � `� , . , ` •-: :a i � ,�� 1 � ��� 'R �. � . � ,' + ��.F � ;y � '{ � 4.,. ' . ! . F i t � ... T • �' x::� +4 4�.' 'a • LI�.. .«a',�' " �.�. }. . . 5 .. +�, i�`���.� . 8 . i'� �; , %�jd�� / � 9 t�-Y. . r• � . � � �� � � I '� � 4 F. ;, + � <.� 1: .. S i ; �.., a •.° . + � ` +} ,� 'ri ,4 -�, Y:.': ei'L ;; � f� �• � � �' � t_ . � t � ��y'h P4�. �F �'�}, . �. �:/"'�/� , .. t f ��� � � JO � � r � 4 � t��; � 1'h N0. ?� d:.,,��. y � ��,. aF` .:�e� ^7;, �..Z T���y� � � 2� `� r s'�' � �k' ,, ' ` :• � ' � y � �� '� t f�. ' f�j ... ��� � T-�`• r�� � ts•' ' .. . ' ., ,.��,"��'„ �y<v.�,: . +!.'.,: � ` � r � � �i,rt /�^r�� '��� f . � . :,.�. �.. � } ` a . �� -�`= r1 ;`- @_ ��z �., �� � ��� . � • . ' . �� s+ x r '' a 3•`' ��� � i.F .. :�� i�+' .� �it`x .�t 7� ' � . � . ., .� ♦ `F f � Y�.. .J:�.. ���<�: T. ...'��... ... . � ' j �. <�. � -.�a> �r -: .%� .. � 3 � '��i . 'i'� i !a � � �, � � - . I . / a✓ . � ,� . < ,v�i q ��sr � �,/� .�f � .; � ` A. t��a ..Y ���1�}i ��. ' F � �!A ~ ]i� y� 1 y.1LL�r� � � •'H l � � .. .6! r � � � ' �. �� i � r�y '' � .. � � � . . p.i:e . � f. �iJ% ��' ! �y � � . •. f r � ��=� �,���a �9 ia� �,+ . _ . "i� � �$ �, ;��' �t . �,. . . .. . i`�. f t i, �< J k. • ra ., y�F` .,�.� /%� �, - . . . . � !� �,� . '. � � �, ��. � �.�"4:,� r �j�q� ; ,y� ., � . p� � ' �.�F'�! ��' . ♦�s f...��. G, �„ r i � i� ' , F q � `'�? ' � .. ', . -a. + � ;�?.� �r.. � � qi�� �s . ',� . . � � � � �-y � ��, �N�{. .��i . �a 1 'Fs:� - ; . 1.�� �� ���'3s` ± . �y ... J J ii''.. .. �. fT . �✓; . . , ti� . � \ .. .'. � '':. , . �. S ' ,� ;,,� �., � ., ?� ' � µ '� a � ��_����.� ,d v : �f..3i�*i' . - .. .. � �.a ' � . � . �:" � r �'• �r . ..�_'t.x, t , ���� ,� � �r� ._ � �. y ��l,A" +;� —. .".i ".: _.> �".-�:'s`�: }[: - �. I t£�.' . _?- �„-,-` :;; ,a � � �� � �.. 5,�;>.. �� '" . � > - ,.,..�-�- �- �r:rr'-� ,o .. r. ' F ��' ��, �� � �' -,.,......,�,.�,....� �.,:�, a._,�..�W�-x ,9 P�: ;.�� � �. �''a �:l'. � '� - w 'p:.-..�'.� 1��I�!�����4 ± °., . � � � �a � , ' ��,d i � � ! �t. '� �'; �. � � ';. `� � w� . � s' � ` . F. , r �t .f�y, �� 7 �"'�p` �; trL'�: , i ']���IY� ,��> � y+" „ °� .^Y��y ' �., ; ' � � �: ; , � �; ' � !� f P i' 3 . J k �7 },��� 4,�. � r a � .,, ,. :�^�,+� � r. � ,,,�: : � ,� .��,; ., �° � �S`�'�,Y � j 4 ' _ , i e.} . e e r �' . ���� y ' F�,�'�y�s _ r ..�C�. � e ��t !'S`41" , sy .. � '#A ' . �^�� . ;�I' .�r 4 1 . `i�! ' � ��`,��.� - � � f a.1 ��� 7 .. . � `� . r .. .'T ' . r- r�� ... ., :�� . � a 7�� � - 57% i'� _-, . � . .. 4^�� . >-- r `j �� A ,u[ . a. ' / ' TP FY � �, -�r. � r�`�i � ��l Il � . _ ... ' ; �.''< .. 4 s � S�' . . C � �• � � ,?5, =:;�. .` . r. - � , '� � 11 �`�''`� � # " j - ' �{ ,.: > , : 3 , � � . .� ' �5 1 i � . ��'. . 1 1 f �t�etd�� �. .i. _ . , �qt�,aff � �` — ,3,a� ,x k,;��, i �°:���� ;�, � :�;:� ':s. ,��: :_,:;.,; ��,.� # •, � µ. , . w ' >� �4X' f �-�. �q� . k , t..�Ct.:.�� f'� -� .='��e r .+^. �'a<�.�:'�'-�-� :: � ��. ,,.,` � . ���. rr�< � _ . .� r;-;, _ �r:, �. � a` a� .. Y a. M�'� �t` Y� ��p�y � � A .! i e < '�{ .'1� �c,`d`a.�.� '. � ti� -� � ��"� . ` ��IG' 1 ��. �~.`v � �. ; �.,, 's-' � �`F i ��� y � ��: !� �E � \� �{ 1 j � f ' �:,� � i� ��.r�Z "rE��''zu��:�*F'i Q�w}v. a_--r r'n 4 . �F �Tl t��i ��� �. � '..° I J' i '. �� �" � :���i ,�i � " `� 4 �%��� � � , r �� � z � .� ,�� � '' � ,.i ��: a `i . - i� I i 1 I, l tl f � _ � �a� ....�. .: : ... t. I iw. � .z ������ � .� � �: �� �' "� ;_. ,.;, .Z i Y >�h E1 � '� �: `i �.�i i � �� � ,vf' � :�. i. ?? � C�ty °� Report to 2� ; ; Committee of Adjustment I KERI Application Number: P/CA 35/10 Meeting Date: October 13, 2010 From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner— Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 35/10 K. & M. Brown 834 Naroch Boulevard (Lot 257, Plan M 14) City of Pickering Application: The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520 to permit a rear yard depth of 5.1 metres to a proposed sunroom, a side yard width of 1.1 metres to an existing attached garage, an accessory building side yard width of 0.4 metres and a rear yard depth of 0.6 metres, and a lot coverage of 39 percent, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 7.5 metres, a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres, a minimum accessory building setback of 1.0 metre from all lot lines and a maximum lot coverage of 30 percent. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for the proposed sunroom. Recommendation: The Planning & Development Department considers the rear yard depth of 5.1 metres, side yard width of 1.1 metres, an accessory building side yard width of 0.4 metres, a rear yard depth of 0.6 metres and a lot coverage of 39 percent to be minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances appiies only to the proposed sunroom, as generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs submitted plans with this application. 2. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by October 12, 2012, or this decision shall become null and void. Report P/CA 35/10 Comment: O�cial Plan and zoning By-law October 13, 2010 Page 2 2 � Pickering Official Plan —"Low Density Area — Urban Residential Area" within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood Zoning By-law — 252� —"R4" — Fourth Density Zone Appropriateness of the Application Rear Yard Variance • the intent of the minimum rear yard depth of a 7.5 metre requirement is to ensure that a useable amenity space is provided in the rear yard • the subject lot will maintain adequate amenity space in the rear of the subject property as the proposed sunroom will encroach only into a portion of the required rear yard • the existing lot backs onto a park and the reduced rear yard depth will not impact other residential lots . the intent of the zoning by-law will be maintained Side Yard Variance • the intent of a minimum side yard width of 1.5 metres for a detached dwelling where a garage is erected as a part of the dwelling is to maintain an established character of openness, to maintain a buffer space between dwellings and adjacent lots, and to provide adequate access to the rear yard of the property • the proposed side yard widths of 1.1 metres provides adequate buffer space between dwellings and access to the rear yard of the property . the proposed side yard widths does not appear to have an adverse impact on the surrounding neighbourhood • the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Accessory Structure Setback Variance • the intent of the minimum setback of 1.0 metre from all lot lines for all accessory structures is to ensure an adequate amount of space is provided for maintenance of all accessory structures • the proposed 0.4 metre and 0.6 metre to the existing garden shed from all lot lines provides adequate amount of space for maintenance • the setbacks are existing situations that appears to have no adverse impact on the surrounding neighbours • the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained 3 i� Report P/CA 35/10 Lot Coverage Variance October 13, 2010 Page 3 the intent of the maximum lot coverage requirement is to ensure the maintenance of an appropriate amount of amenity area uncovered by buildings and to regulate the maximum size and mass of buildings on a lot an acceptable amount of amenity space would be provided with the proposed site design the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Date of report: October 6, 2010 Comments prepared by: ��� Mila Yeung Planner I MY: RP:Id colalrepar151201 NpceJS10 Oa Enclosures ��/J �� Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner— Development Review � �� �� �� �� V /` PEACE I� BAYLY � w w ������� � ������ :���A.. � -o• .. III- . �IIIIlIIII NIIIII� • ���I� ._.��s�dr�� ' � nvE. City of Pickering PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LOt 257, Plan M14 owNER K. & M. Brown FILE No. P/CA 035/10 Tamnet�Enb�p�iyea Inq ontl Ae wpplmra. All riqnls ftenerve e� .�r,.. STREET MITCHEL P,4RK ea rviEw t HEIGHTS L/C SCNOOL S/R ✓ONN Planning & Development Department DATE Sept. 8, 2010 DRAWN BY JB � SCALE 1;10000 CHECKED BV RP N PN3 3� 3� it a 1.1 metre i width to the attached :rmit a 0.4 metre yard width to an ina shed � Information Compiled from Applicants Submitted plan P/CA 35110 K. & M. Brown NAROCHBULEVARD � -- 152m ----� ,�__' —� , Roofcumqry. �—� EvsN�g ' 1 smglecu i � ` 8�`86 i � � � EXISTCNG 1.1m i �SUNGALO� �- � 'I� �- � m 152m ---� To permit a 0.6 metre rear yard depth to an existing shed � E v 0 � � permit a lot rerage of 39 percent To pertnit a 5.1 metre re9r yard depth to a proposed sunroom N This mapwaz pmtlucetl by the Ciry of Pickaring Planning 8 Developmenf Oepartmenf, Planning Informa�ion Servirss tlivision Mapping antl Design, Sept 28. 2010. �ty °� Report to ' ' Committee of Adjustment I ERI � � Application Number: P/CA 36/10 Meeting Date: October 13, 2010 From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner— Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 36/10 G. & T. Abdee 1773 Central Street (Lot 37 & 38, Plan 43) City of Pickering Application: The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06 to permit a front yard depth of 8.6 metres to existing dwelling and to permit a height of 5.9 metres for the proposed two storey detached garage whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard depth of 9.0 metres and a maximum height of 3.5 metres for accessory structures. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit for the proposed garage. Recommendation: The Planning & Development Department considers the front yard depth of 8.6 metres and the height of 5.9 metres for an accessory structure to be minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the proposed variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances applies only to the existing dwelling and the proposed garage, as generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs submitted plans with this application. 2. As part of the building permit submission, the applicant ensures that no habitable space is proposed within the proposed detached garage. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by October 12, 2012, or this decision shall become null and void. � �s Report P/CA 36/10 Comment: Official Plan and Zoning By-law October 13, 2010 Page 2 Pickering Official Plan —"Rural Settlement - Oak Ridges Moraine Rural HamleY' within the Claremont Settlement Area Zoning By-law — 3037 as amended by By-Law 6640/O6 —"ORM-R5" — Oak Ridges Moraine Hamlet Residential Five Appropriateness of the Application Front Yard Depth Variance the intent of the front yard depth requirement is to provide an adequate buffer space beiween street activity and to provide an adequate landscaped area within the front of the property the proposed 8.6 metre front yard depth to the existing dwelling is an existing situation that would maintain the neighbourhood character on Central Street, provide an appropriate buffer space and provide an adequate landscaped area within the front yard of the property the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Accessory Structure Height Variance • the intent of the maximum accessory building height of 3.5 metres is to minimize the visual impact of accessory buildings on abutting properties and on the streetscape, and to ensure other yards are not sign�cantly obstructed by these structures on the property • the location of the proposed detached garage having a height of 5.9 metres will not create a visual impact on the surrounding streetscape • the design of the garage will complement the existing dwelling • the intent of the zoning by-law will be maintained Date of report: October 6, 2010 Comments prepared by: '"� V�.��r (-i"^"!\ iJ `1 Mila Yeung � Planner I MY:RP:Id cmvrepomnaim�sai o.aoc Enclosures �p�,Q/.� �� Ross Pym, MCI�, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review 3� 3�j Information Compiled from Applicants Submitted plan P/CA 36/10 G. 8� T. Abdee __.___. �, ' �, � � 0 m v ,/\ /SHED �\ 1 � �./ , CENTRALSTREET 35.3m � E � � EXISTI N G DWELLING E 0 m v PROPOSED ; 2 STOREY GARAGE recognize an 8.6 tre front yard deF it an accessory with a height of � -`- - - � ' � N This map was produced Dy ihe City o( Pickering Planning & �evelopmen� Departmen( Planning Inknnation Services division Mappng antl Oesign, Sept.28, 2010. , �,...,,��='�o'� � =. .._> > _ . �.�_._ Report to Committee af Adjustment Application Number: P/CA 37/10 Meeting Date: October 13, 2010 From: Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner — Development Review Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application P/CA 37/10 D. Donato & P. Bonvaitacola 1910 Pine Grove Avenue (Part lot 26, Plan 329) City of Pickering Application: The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036 to permit a two storey addition onto the existing detached dwelling and proposes the following variances listed in Column I whereas the by-law requires for the minimum/maximum listed in Column I!: Column I Column ll Nature of Variance ApplicanYs Zoning By-law Pro osal Re uirement A minimum lot frontage 13.6 metres 60 metres B minimum lot area 0.08 hectares 0.8 hectares C maximum lot coverage 30 percent 10 percent p maximum lot coverage for all g percent 5 percent accesso structures E minimum front yard depth 2.3 metres 12.0 metres F minimum side yard depth to 2.2 metres 3.0 metres ro osed covered deck G minimum side yard depth to 2.4 metres 3.0 metres ro osed two store addition H minimum side yard depth to existing 0.3 metre 3.0 metres dwellin �& � minimum setback from all lot line for 0.3 metre 1.0 metres all accesso structures The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for the proposed house addition. 37 Report P/CA 37/10 October 13, 2010 � � Page 2 Recommendation: The Planning & Development Department considers the existing lot frontage of 13.6 metres, existing lot area of 0.08 hectares, existing front yard depth of 2.3 metres, side yard depth of 2.2 metres to a proposed covered deck, side yard depth of 2.4 metres to a proposed two storey addition, side yard depth of 0.3 metres to the existing dwelling, rear yard depths of 0.3 metre to an existing accessory structure, a lot coverage of 30 percent, and a lot coverage of 9 percent for all accessory structures to be minor variances that are desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends Approval of the ptoposed variances, subject to the following conditions: That these variances applies only to the existing and proposed function and use of the existing and proposed structures, as generally sited and outlined on the applicanYs submitted plans with this application; 2. That the applicant demolish and remove the accessory structure in the north west corner of the subject property to the satisfaction of the City Pickering; 3. That any garage on the subject property shall be required to have a minimum front yard depth of 5.0 metres in order to be compatible with the existing neighbourhood; 4. That the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed construction by October 12, 2012, orthis decision shall become null and void. Comment: O�cial Plan and Zoning By-law Pickering Official Plan —"Urban Residential — Low Density Area" within the Highbush Neighbourhood Zoning By-law — 3036 —"A" — Agricultural Zone Appropriateness of the Application Existing Lot Frontage and Lot Area • the existing lot frontage of 13.6 metres and existing lot area of 833 square metres are long standing existing situations • the existing lot appears to be in keeping with the varying lot frontages and lot areas on Pine Grove Avenue • the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Report P/CA 37/10 Lot Coverage Variance October 13, 2010 Page 3 � � the intent of the maximum lot coverage requirement is to ensure the maintenance of an appropriate amount of amenity area uncovered by buildings and to regulate the maximum size and mass of buildings on a lot an acceptable amount of amenity space would be provided with the proposed site design the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Accessory Building Lot Coverage Variance • the intent of the 5 percent maximum accessory building lot coverage is to ensure the maintenance of an appropriate amount of amenity area uncovered by buildings and to regulate the maximum size and mass of accessory buildings on a lot • the proposed 9 percent maximum accessory building lot coverage appears to have no adverse impact on the surrounding neighbours . an acceptable amount of uncovered area would be provided with the proposed site design • the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Side Yard Widths Variance • the intent of a minimum side yard width of 3.0 metres is to maintain an established character of openness, to maintain a buffer space between dwellings and adjacent lots, and to provide adequate access to the rear yard of the property • the proposed side yard width of 2.2 metres to the proposed covered deck provides adequate buffer space in a residential neighbourhood • the proposed side yard depth of 2.4 metres to a proposed two storey addition provides adequate buffer space in a residential neighbourhood • the existing side yard width of 0.3 metre to an accessory structure is an existing situation since originally constructed • the proposed side yard widths does not appear to have an adverse impact on the surrounding neighbourhood • the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Accessory Structure Setback Variance • the intent of the minimum setback of 1.0 metres from all lot lines for all accessory structures is to ensure an adequate amount of space is provided for maintenance of all accessory structures . the proposed 0.3 metres setback to the existing accessory structure is a long standing existing situation that will be corrected with the demolition of this structure as per condition 2 of the recommended conditions of approval of this report • the intent of the zoning by-law would be maintained Report P/CA 37/10 4 9) Input From Other Sources Manager, Development Control Date of report: October 6, 2010 Comments prepared by: ���� V Mila Yeung Planner I MY:RP:Id wfe/repo�sY101Mpra3}-t0.tloc Enclosures October 13, 2010 Page 4 • grading and drainage concerns for the proposed addition will be addressed at the building permit stage a��O�D � � � Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner— Development Review 41 4'? Information Compiled from Applicants Submitted plan P/CA 37/10 D. DiDonato & P. Bonanvitacola C O WJ 1:i.Fim PINEGROVE AVENUE O �.J N This map was protlucetl by ihe Gi�y W Pickering Planning & Oevelopment Depatlment. Planning Informatlon Services tlivision Mapping and �esign, Sept.2, 20t0.