Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD 01-10 Report to Planning Development I KERIN Committee Report Number: PD 01-10 Date: January 4, 2010 0? From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 16/08 Lebovic Enterprises Limited Part Lot 18, Concession 3 City of Pickering Recommendation: 1. That Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 submitted by Lebovic Enterprises Limited, to permit a residential plan of subdivision on lands being on Part of Lot 18 Concession 3 be, as shown on the Staff Recommended Plan, Attachment #5 to Report PD 01-10, be endorsed; 2. That the proposed conditions of draft plan approval of subdivision to implement Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 as set out in Appendix I to Report PD 01-10 be endorsed; 3. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 16/08 submitted by Lebovic Enterprises. Limited, to amend the zoning of the subject property to implement Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08, as outlined in Appendix II to Report PD 01-10 be endorsed; 4. That the City Solicitor be authorized to attend the Ontario Municipal Board Pre-Hearing on January 22, 2010, and any subsequent hearing, to support Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 and Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 16/08 as endorsed by Council; and 5. Further, that Council authorize the execution by the Mayor and Clerk the cost sharing agreement to facilitate acquisition of land for the development of William Jackson Drive and to secure cost sharing arrangements. Executive Summary: The applicant's submitted revised plan proposes to develop a draft plan of subdivision consisting of 28 detached dwellings, 24 semi-detached dwellings and 106 townhouse dwellings for a total of 158 dwelling units. The plan proposes new municipal roads and laneways to service the proposed dwellings (see Location Map and Applicant's Submitted Revised Plan, Attachments #1 & #4). Report PD 01-10 January 4, 2010, Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 02 Zoning Amendment Application A 16/08 Page 2 The applications were appealed by Lebovic Enterprises Limited (Lebovic) to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) as the municipality failed to make a decision respecting the applications within the time frame established in the Planning Act. With the development of this draft plan, the western leg of Old Taunton Road will be stopped-up and closed, and a new collector road will be constructed southerly through the draft plan to connect with the proposed William Jackson Drive in the southerly abutting Mattamy draft plan of subdivision. A portion of the land now occupied by Old Taunton Road is proposed to be developed into a Village Green that will have townhouse dwelling units fronting onto it. In March 2009 the applicant acquired additional land adjacent to the south limit of the draft plan from the Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC). These ORC lands had applications. before the City for approval of a draft plan of subdivision (SP-2008-10) and a zoning by-law amendment (A 20/08). Lebovic consolidated these lands and their associated applications with its original applications and submitted a revised consolidated draft plan. Staff are recommending various changes to the revised draft plan to better address the relationship of the proposed residential lots with the southerly adjacent school block (see Staff Recommended Plan, Attachment #5). The staff recommended plan more appropriately addresses urban design matters for the southern portion of the draft plan and provides a lotting pattern that will allow for the development of a housing form that is more compatible with the adjacent school block to the south. It is recommended that the applications be endorsed by Council, and that the City Solicitor be authorized to attend the Ontario Municipal Board Pre-Hearing on January 22, 2010, and any subsequent hearing, to support Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 and Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 16/08 as endorsed by Council. The City's requirements respecting development of the subject property will be addressed through conditions of Draft Plan of Subdivision Approval and site-specific zoning provisions, to be presented to the OMB. Financial Implications: The City will be responsible for certain capital costs related to the development of the Village Green, and the ongoing maintenance of both this facility and the multi-purpose trails within the draft plan (located on Street "A" and Street "B"). Additional City resources (i.e. snow clearing equipment) are anticipated to be required to service the laneways. Some funding for the upgrade of roads to collector road status will be provided through Development Charges. Sustainability Implications: The applicant submitted a Sustainability Report that is based on the City's Draft Sustainability Guidelines. Staff have reviewed the report and rated the draft plan as achieving a Level 1 score. The proposed draft plan incorporates many of the elements set out in the Guidelines. Report PD 01-10 January 4, 2010 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Zoning Amendment Application A 16/08 Page 3 03 The applicant has been encouraged to pursue additional sustainable measures set out in the Guidelines in order to achieve a higher rating for the development. 1.0 Background: 1.1 Introduction Lebovic submitted revised applications for a draft plan of subdivision and amendment to the zoning by-law in order to implement a draft plan of subdivision on the subject lands (see Location Map, Attachment #1). The draft plan of subdivision proposed the creation of 28 lots for detached dwellings, 12 lots for 24 semi-detached dwellings and 20 blocks for 106 townhouse dwelling units. The townhouse product consists of both street townhouses and lane townhouses (see Applicant's Submitted Revised Plan, Attachment #4). The original applications were presented at a Statutory Public Information Meeting held on September 29, 2008 (see Applicant's Submitted Original Plan, Attachment #2). The owner acquired additional lands adjacent to the south limit of the Plan from ORC and thereby inherited the draft plan of subdivision and zoning amendment application (see ORC Plan, Attachment #3). These applications were the subject of a Statutory Public Information Meeting held on February 2, 2009. The owner then consolidated the former ORC lands into the original applications and requested the closing of the former ORC applications. The revised consolidated draft plan was then submitted and circulated to various agencies and departments. On September 24, 2009, the owner's solicitor submitted appeals to the OMB for the revised draft plan of subdivision and zoning by-law amendment applications (see Attachment #6). The appeals are based on the City's failure to make a decision on the applications in accordance with the time frames of the Planning Act. The OMB has set a Pre-Hearing Conference on January 22, 2010 to consider these appeals. The OMB has reserved dates for a three day hearing commencing on February 24, 2010, if required. These appeals will be considered by the OMB with the appeals related to Lebovic Enterprises Limited draft plan of subdivision and rezoning applications west of Brock Road (SP-2008-09 and A 17/08) and the appeals related to Cougs (Tillings) Limited draft plan of subdivision and rezoning applications also located west of Brock Road (SP-2005-04 and A 36/05). Staff comments and recommendations in this report pertain to the revised consolidated draft plan of subdivision that proposes the development of detached dwellings, semi-detached dwellings and townhouse dwelling units and open space blocks (see Staff Recommended Plan, Attachment #5). 'Report PD 01-10 January 4, 2010 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 04 Zoning Amendment Application A 16/08 Page 4 The following chart outlines the proposed development detail of the original plan compared to the revised draft plan of subdivision: Revised Details of the Applications Original Plan ORC Plan Consolidated (see Attachments #2 to #4) Plan Total area of draft plan - 5.35 ha 1.09 ha 6.450 ha Area for residential lots - 3.17 ha 0.48 ha 3.68 ha Area of Open Space block - 0.80 ha 0.01 ha 0.81 ha Municipal road and lanes - 1.37 ha 0.58 ha 1.95 ha Detached dwelling - 15 NA 13 - 9.0 metres lot frontage Detached dwelling - 13 NA 15 - 11.0 metres lot frontage Semi-Detached Dwellings - 24 24 Street townhouse units - 17 NA 31 -'6.0 metres lot frontage Street townhouse units - 29 NA 33 - 7.0 metres lot frontage Rear lane townhouses - 37 22 42 r - 6.0 metres lot frontage Total dwelling units - 135 22 158 Net residential density - 42.4 45.4 42.9 (units per hectare) 2.0 Comments Received: 2.1 At the September 29, 2008 and February 2, 2009 Information Meetings Three area residents spoke at the September 29, 2008 Information Meeting for the original applications to seek information and expressed concern respecting impact on private services, impact on the wildlife corridor, and timing of the development (see Text of the Information Report, Attachment #7 and Meeting Minutes, Attachment #8). No public spoke at the February 2, 2009 Information Meeting (see Text of the Information Report, Attachment #9 and Meeting Minutes, Attachment #10). 2.2 Following the Information Meeting Comments from Kahn Auction Ltd. noted that they endorse development and upgrades to the area. However, they noted that their property is currently serviced by private well and septic and expressed concern over any potential impacts the proposed development may have on these private services (see Attachment #11). l Report PD 01-10 January 4, 2010 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Zoning Amendment Application A 16/08 Page 5 05 2.3 Agency Comments 2.3.1 Region of Durham The Region of Durham has provided the following comments: • the proposal is permitted by the policies of the Durham Region Official Plan; • the subject lands are within the Growth Plan and would conform to the Growth Plan. Future intensification in strategic locations that facilitate transit- supportive land use is encouraged and should be considered; • the applications have been screened in accordance with Provincial Interests and Delegated Review and there is no concern with the applications as certain requirements can be addressed through conditions of approval; • municipal water supply and sanitary sewer service can be provided by the extension of services; and, • the Region has no objection to the applications and has provided conditions of approval (see Attachment #12). 2.3.2 Toronto and Region Conservation The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has advised that the subject land is located in the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood and is therefore subject to the Council adopted Official Plan Amendment 18, the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines and the Duffin Heights ESP. Environmental matters are required to be addressed by these policies. Certain matters, such as compensation for loss of headwater tributaries, can be addressed through conditions of approval. As such, TRCA has no objection to the applications and has provided conditions of approval (see Attachment #13). 2.3.3 Conseil scolaire de district du Centre-Sud-Quest The Conseil scolaire de district du Centre-Sud-Quest has advised that a school site is required in the catchment area of Durham Region. The School Board has requested a condition of approval be included, regarding their need for a site on the subject land, until a school site has been finalized at another location (see Attachment #14). The comment and conditions that have been provided by Conseil scolaire de district du Centre-Sud-Quest are the same comments that have been received for other recent draft plans of subdivisions in Pickering. It is staff's understanding the School Board is currently investigating a possible school site elsewhere in Pickering, however no formal agreement has been entered into. The School Board's request for a school site in this draft plan is not being accommodated. The approved Duffin Heights Neighbourhood plan identifies two school sites and the Board could investigate the availability of either of these sites as a possible school location. Report PD 01-10 January 4, 2010 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 06 Zoning Amendment Application A 16/08 Page 6 2.3.4 Durham Catholic District School Board The Durham Catholic District School Board has requested that the southerly abutting school site lands, that are designated for a Catholic elementary school, be increased in size. They have requested that three townhouse blocks, being Blocks 58, 59 and 60 comprising 14 townhouse dwelling units be removed from the plan and identified as a school block to be incorporated with the southerly abutting school block lands (see Attachment #15). 2.3.5 Other Agencies The following agencies or departments advised they have no objection to the applications and certain technical issues and requirements related to the proposed use of the lands can be addressed during the detailed subdivision approval/implementation process, should these applications be approved: 1 Canada Post (see Attachment #16); 2 Durham District School Board (see Attachment #17); 3 Rogers Cable Communication (see Attachment #18); 4 GTAA (see Attachment #19); 5 Hydro One (see Attachment #20); 6 Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. (see Attachment #21); 7 Veridian Connections (see Attachment #22); 8 Bell (see Attachment #23); 9 Enbridge Pipeline Inc (see Attachment #24). 2.4 City Department Comments 2.4.1 Development Control A subdivision agreement and a construction management plan will be required to address development of the site. The subdivision agreement will address, but not be limited to: road construction, easements, fencing, traffic management, off-site works, and cost sharing. Servicing requirements need to be in accordance with the Environmental Servicing Plan for Duffin Heights and an approved Functional Servicing and Stormwater Report. Modification to the plan may be required to address certain matters depending on the final layout of the draft plan of subdivision. The applicant should be responsible for required improvement to Old Taunton Road where it abuts the draft plan. Cost sharing the William Jackson Drive extension will need to be finalized. I Report PD 01-10 January 4, 2010 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Zoning Amendment Application A 16/08 Page 7 07 3.0 Discussion: 3.1 The Applicant has Appealed the Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning Applications to the Ontario Municipal Board Lebovic has appealed both the Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications to the OMB. The applicant's appeals are submitted under Subsection 34 (11) and, Subsection 51 (34) of the Ontario Planning Act due to the municipality failing to make a decision on either application within 120 and 180 days respectively (see Attachment #6). The OMB has scheduled a pre-hearing conference on January 22, 2010 and reserved a three day hearing commencing February 24, 2010 to hear these appeals and the appeals related to the Lebovic draft plan/rezoning as well as the Cougs draft plan/rezoning applications. As the applications have been appealed, the OMB is now the approval authority and could approve a lotting and/or road pattern different from what Council endorses. It is our expectation that the applicant will introduce professional opinion evidence to support any aspect of the Council recommendation that they are not in agreement with. Therefore, the City should be represented by legal counsel at the OMB hearing in order to protect the City's interests and to advance the recommendation of City Council before the OMB. In view of these hearing dates, staff must seek Council's direction regarding staff's role at the hearing at this time as the only Council meeting prior to the hearing is January 18, 2010.. It is recommended that the City Solicitor be authorized to attend the hearings to support the Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment application as endorsed by Council. 3.2 The Proposed Density is Acceptable The residential portion of the subject property is designated Urban Residential Area - Medium Density Area and Mixed Use Areas - Mixed Corridors, in the Pickering Official Plan. The Mixed Use Areas - Mixed Corridors designation requires development to comply with a residential density of over 30 units up to and including 140 units per net hectare and the Urban Residential Area - Medium Density Area establishes a density range of over 30 dwellings per net hectare and up to and including 80 dwellings per net hectare. Based on the current design the density for this development is 42.9 dwelling units per net hectare. 3.3 Lotting Reconfiguration Recommended To address improved interface with the future school block and to improve the townhouse lot configuration in the northwest sector of the plan, it is recommended that the design of specific lots and road/lanes be modified (see Staff Recommended Plan, Attachment #5). Report PD 01-10 January 4, 2010 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 08 Zoning Amendment Application A 16/08 Page 8 3.3.1 South-east Sector of Plan In order to provide greater neighbourhood exposure for the future school block it is recommended that the east/west leg of Street "B" be shifted south to abut the future school block. The school board has advised that its preferred design is to have a school block that provides two road frontages thereby providing greater design flexibility in the laying out of school facilities. The proposed road relocation can be accommodated with the introduction of a lane for the townhouse block. This would create dwelling units facing the school without any driveways onto the street. This will also provide a heighted level of safety by providing "eyes on the street" and eliminating driveway conflict with pedestrians. In terms of request of the Durham Catholic District School Board to expand the southerly abutting school block into this draft plan it is noted that the proposed school block does not form part of this draft plan and is subject to independent applications for rezoning and draft plan of subdivision to create the actual school block. The size of the school block was established when ORC severed this parcel from its holdings in the area. It is staff understanding that ORC, representing the Province, took into consideration the required size of the school block when they submitted their severance application. It is also recommended that the north/south leg of Street "B" be widened from 15.5 metres to 16.0 metres to accommodate a trail width of 2.0 metres. 3.3.2 North-west Sector of Plan The proposed townhouse blocks in the northwest sector of the plan should all be serviced by municipal roads or lanes. Therefore, the entire north/south leg of Street "C" should be widened to 15.5 metres and the northern most lane should be widened to the minimum municipal standard of 8.5 metres. This change is recommended in order"to have a consistent unit design and streetscape for both the internal street view (Street "C") and from Brock Road. The widening of the lane to 8.5 metres will eliminate the need for a draft plan of condominium and provide all future homeowners with the same level of service., The final design for this sector will be investigated further with the applicant in order to best address the streetscape/urban design and the related noise attenuation for this area. If an enhanced design is proposed by the applicant and is satisfactory to the City then this design can be accommodated during the processing of the final plan through a red-line revision to the draft plan. 3.4 The Natural Heritage Feature Identified on the Site Will be Protected Lands that are designated Open Space Systems - Natural Area are intended to be used primarily for conservation, environmental protection, restoration, education passive recreation and similar uses. Report PD 01-10 January 4, 2010 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Zoning Amendment Application A 16/08 Page 9 The lands that are part of the subdivision that are designated Open Space Systems - Natural Area form part of the Urfe Creek valley system and are proposed to be conveyed to a public authority and used as natural area. This complies with the policies of the City of Pickering Official Plan. It is recommended that lands determined to be designated Open Space Systems - Natural Area be excluded from residential lotting and be zoned Open Space- Hazard Land (OS-HL) which only permits the preservation of the natural environment (see Appendix II, Recommended Zoning By-law). 3.5 Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines The recently approved Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines (NDG) provide design objectives for the neighbourhood, being: • to create accessible pedestrian-oriented residential areas, distinct in character and harmonious with the larger neighbourhood; • to create a streetscape which is attractive, safe and encourages social interaction within the neighbourhood; • to establish a central focus to the neighbourhood which is safe, lively and attractive; • to provide a diversity of uses to support neighbourhood and City functions; • to preserve and maintain the ecological function of the tableland forest and valleylands; • to promote site development and building/construction that is consistent with the City's Sustainable Development Guidelines; and, • to provide a mix of housing types, forms, affordability and tenure, on a variety of lot frontages. The staff recommended plan achieves these design objectives. The introduction of laneway based dwelling units adds to the streetscape component of the neighbourhood, provides on-street parking opportunities and increases variety in housing form. The NDG require that all the residential development in the draft plan be subject to Architectural Design Control. Architectural Control will promote a.high degree of streetscape design within an overall neighbourhood plan. The objectives include: • creating distinctive and appealing streetscapes through attention to building design and detailing; • ensuring appropriate massing, materials and building siting; • design compatibility; • identifying specific design requirements for specific priority lots having highly visible elevations; and, • encourage pedestrian friendly streetscape. Report PD 01-10 January 4, 2010 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 10 Zoning Amendment Application A 16/08 Page 10 Specifically, the siting, massing, and facade, design of townhouse units shall be coordinated on a block-by-block basis. The applicant will be required to provide special attention to the detail design of the townhouses, particularly along Street "A" (William Jackson Drive) including the associated laneway. 3.6 Duffin Heights Environmental Servicing Plan (ESP) Requirements Need to be Satisfied On October 20, 2008, City Council endorsed the recommendations of the Final Duffin Heights Environmental Servicing Plan (ESP) prepared by Sernas Associates on behalf of Lebovic, Mattamy Homes, Cougs (Tillings) Investments Limited and the Ontario Realty Corporation. The completion of the ESP is a necessary prerequisite to the consideration and approval of development applications in Duffin Heights. The ESP provides detailed information on the development limits, servicing requirements and recommendations to protect and enhance the natural heritage system including appropriate ecological buffers and stormwater management. On May 19, 2009 Council adopted Official Plan Amendment 18 that implemented City Council's endorsement of the recommendations of the ESP. On October 29, 2009 the OMB approved Official Plan Amendment 18. The ESP set out certain prerequisites and requirements that must be satisfied prior to development, (including the subject draft plan of subdivision). These include, but are not limited to: • Functional Servicing and Stormwater Report; • Monitoring Report; • Compensation Report; • Fish Habitat Restoration Fund contribution; • Watershed System Monitoring and Management Fund contribution; and, • Adaptive Management Fund contribution. Some of these requirements will form part of the cost sharing agreement between the Duffin Heights Landowners Group. The required reports have/should be initiated by the applicant and will need to be finalized and accepted by the City and/or TRCA as part of the final subdivision approval process. The required monetary contributions will be secured through conditions of draft approval for the subdivision., As part of the Council endorsed ESP and the recently approved Official Plan Amendment 18, the major land owners in Duffin Heights (including Lebovic) are required to enter into a cost sharing agreement, that will be administrated by a trustee, to ensure all landowners pay their proportional share of the cost to develop the neighbourhood. Therefore, prior to the registration of any draft plan of subdivision, the City will require that the cost sharing agreement has been finalized and that confirmation has been received from the trustee that all of Lebovic's financial contribution has been provided. Report PD 01-10 January 4, 2010 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Zoning Amendment Application A 16/08 Page 11 3.7 Off-Site Works are Required to service the Draft Plan As part of the development of the draft plan certain off-site work will be required by the subdivider to service the draft plan. These works involve lands owned by the City and private landowners. 3.7.1 William Jackson Drive Part of the development of the draft plan will be to construct Street `'A", being William Jackson Drive, from the north limit of the Mattamy draft plan to Old Taunton Road. In order for this to occur all the lands required for the road need to be under City ownership, or be in the process of being dedicated to the City for road purposes. Therefore, until all the lands required for the road are in a .position to be dedicated to the City, the draft plan will not be able to be finalized for registration. William Jackson Drive is required to provide servicing for the Lebovic Plan and to provide a second entrance/exit to the draft plan. The road is also required to enable the overall traffic circulation for the east side of the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood. The applicant, City staff and abutting landowners have met to initiate discussions on the requirements to achieve the conveyance and construction of this road. A draft cost sharing agreement specific to the conveyance of land and construction of William Jackson Drive between the subject draft plan and the Mattamy draft plan to the south has been prepared and is currently being reviewed by all parties prior to finalization. The landowners who will be contributing to the cost of constructing William Jackson Drive have requested that the City be a party to their cost sharing agreement as the'land will ultimately be conveyed to the City for a municipal road and for the City to control the reserve blocks adjacent to the right-of-way. Some funding for this road upgrade will be provided through the City's Development Charges Study/By-law. Therefore, as part of the recommendations of this report, staff are seeking Council's authorization to finalize and execute the specific cost sharing agreement for the development of William Jackson Drive that is partially located on lands outside of the subject draft plan of subdivision. 3.7.2 Old Taunton Road The other off-site work that will be required is the development of a Village Green on the former Old Taunton Road road allowance west of the intersection of Street "A" and Old Taunton Road. The development of the Village Green will require the rehabilitation of the former road right-of-way into public open space. The design of the Village Green must ensure that the access to the individual properties on the north side of Old Taunton Road is appropriately maintained. Therefore, the development of the Village Green may have to be phased while the access to the northern properties is maintained. It is anticipated that City staff (Municipal Property & Engineering) will work with the applicant and develop site development concepts. _I i Report PD 01-10 January 4, 2010 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 12 Zoning Amendment Application A 16/08 Page 12 With the City making a land contribution for the Village Green the value of the land must be recognized to the City's satisfaction in a cost sharing agreement. This may result in a parkland dedication credit or some other agreeable compensation in a cost sharing agreement. For Old Taunton Road east of William Jackson Drive the road must be upgraded to City standards. The responsibility and cost sharing of the upgrades will be addressed in the subdivision agreement. 3.8 Parkland Dedication Requirement to be Coordinated for Entire Neighbourhood For the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood, a Master Parks Agreement is being entered into by the major land owners. This agreement, which the City may be a party to, will set out the parkland requirements for the entire neighbourhood. The proposed agreement will outline what lands are to be dedicated for parkland. The Master Parks Agreement will set out that the City will not collect cash-in-lieu of parkland from any developer that is party to the agreement, nor will the City be required to pay for any over dedication. A trustee will administer this cost sharing agreement so that the land owners all pay their proportional share for parkland development in the neighbourhood. The Master Parks Agreement will ensure that the City receives the Planning Act five percent parkland dedication or cash-in-lieu for the entire, neighbourhood. Therefore, even though no parkland is being dedicated through the subject draft plan, the requirement for parkland contribution will be administered through the overall Master Parks Agreement. The establishment of an appropriate Master Parks Agreement to the satisfaction of the City will be a condition of draft approval. 3.9 Proposed Subdivision Conditions of Approval The revised draft plan of subdivision, subject to the noted lot and road modifications referred to in Section 3.3 of this report, is recommended for approval. The draft plan represents appropriate development that conforms to the Official Plan and the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines. Detail design matters are incorporated in the recommended conditions of approval and will be reviewed during the further processing of the application to ensure compliance with the Duffin Heights ESP, City policies and agency requirements. The cost sharing agreement between the major landowners is required to be executed prior to any final approval for registration is granted by the City. Prior to final approval, the City must also receive confirmation from the trustee that all financial contributions have been addressed. The recommended draft plan of subdivision conditions of approval are outlined in Appendix I to this report. Report PD 01-10 January 4, 2010 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Zoning Amendment Application A 16/08 Page 13 3.10 Proposed Zoning The proposed zoning provisions address building location performance standards to ensure an appropriate design for the neighbourhood. The recommendations also contain vehicle parking zoning standards to ensure that all dwellings (detached, semi-detached and townhouses), have a minimum of two functional parking spaces per unit on the private property and a minimum internal garage size. A standard related to minimum front yard landscaped area is included to ensure a minimum amount of any front yard remains landscaped. This provision will also control the maximum size of a driveway, indirectly providing on street parking opportunities. It is noted the proposed zoning contains the same performance standards for all of the proposed subdivisions in Duffin Heights to ensure a uniform zoning throughout the Neighbourhood. The recommended zoning is attached in Appendix II to this report. 4.0 Applicant's Comments: The owner is aware of the recommendations of this Report. Appendices: Appendix I Recommended Conditions of Draft Approval Appendix II Draft Implementing Zoning By-law Requirements and Schedule Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Applicant's Original Submitted Plan 3. ORC Original Plan 4. Revised Consolidated Plan 5. Staff Recommended Plan 6. Notice of Appeal Letter 7. Text of Information Report No. 19-08 8. Minutes from September 29, 2008 Statutory Public Information Meeting 9. Text of Information Report No. 01-09 10. Minutes from February 2, 2009 Statutory Public Information Meeting 11. Landowner's Comment - Kahn Auction Ltd. 12. Agency Comments - Region of Durham Planning Department 13. Agency Comments - TRCA 14. Agency Comments - Conseil scolaire de district du Centre-Sud-Quest 15. Agency Comments - Durham Catholic District School Board Report PD 01-10 January 4, 2010 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 4 Zoning Amendment Application A 16/08 Page 14 16. Agency Comments - Canada Post 17. Agency Comments - Durham District School Board 18. Agency Comments - Rogers Cable 19. Agency Comments - GTAA 20. Agency Comments - Hydro One 21. Agency Comments - Enbridge Gas 22. Agency Comments - Veridian Connection 23 Agency Comments - Bell Canada 24. Agency Comments - Enbridge Pipeline Inc. 25. City Comments - Development Control Prepared. By: Approved/Endorsed By: Ross Pym, MCI PP Neil Ca P, RPP Principal Planer - Development Review Director, Panning & Development Lyn a aylor, MCIP, RPP Manage`, Development Review RP:ld Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council 640 L4O-,, CA0 Thomas . Q inn, RDMR., CMM Chief Administrative Officer Appendix I to Report PD 01-10 Recommended Conditions of Approval for Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Recommended Conditions of Approval for 6 Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 1.0 General Conditions: 1.1 That this recommendation apply to the draft plan prepared by Sernas Associates, revised dated June 2009, on lands being Part of Lot 18, Concession 3, City of Pickering, as modified per comments contained in Report PD 01-10 to permit the development of 28 detached dwellings, 24 semi-detached dwellings and 106 street townhouses on the subject lands. 2.0 Prior to the Registration of the Plan: 2.1 That the owners submit a Draft 40M-Plan based on comments contained in Report PD 01-10 to be approved by the City's Planning & Development Department; 2.2 That the implementing by-law for Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 16/08 become final and binding; 2.3 That the owner enters into a subdivision agreement with and to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering to ensure the fulfillment of the City's requirements, financial and otherwise, which shall include, but not necessarily be limited to the following: 2.3.1 Storm Drainage (a) satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department respecting a stormwater drainage and management system to service all the lands in the subdivision, and any provisions regarding easements; (b) satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department for contributions for downstream stormwater management; (c) satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department for design and implementation of diversion of stormwater from off-site lands as proposed in an approved Functional Servicing and Stormwater Report; 2.3.2 Grading Control and Soils (a) satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department respecting submission and approval of a grading and control plan; (b) satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department respecting the submission and approval of a geotechnical soils analysis; (c) satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department respecting the authorization from abutting land owners for all off-site grading; - I Recommended Conditions of Approval for Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Page 2 2.3.3 Road Allowances (a) satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department respecting construction of roads with curbs, storm sewers, sidewalks and boulevard designs; (b) street names and signage to be provided to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering; (c) that the specific cost sharing agreement for the construction of William Jackson Drive be executed by all required parties to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering; 2.3.4 Construction / Installation of City Works & Services (a) satisfaction of the City respecting arrangements for the provision of all services required by the City; (b) satisfaction of the appropriate authorities respecting arrangements for the provision of underground wiring, street lighting, cable television, natural gas and other similar services; (c) that the cost of any relocation, extension, alteration or extraordinary maintenance of existing services necessitated by this development shall be the responsibility of the subdivider; 2.3.5 Dedications / Transfers / Conveyances (a) that the owner convey to the City, at no costs: (i) any easements as required; and, (ii) any reserves as required by the City-, (b) that the subdivider convey any easement to any utility to facilitate the installation of their services in a location(s) to the satisfaction of the City and the utility; (c) that the owner arrange at no costs to the City any easements required on third party lands for servicing and such easements shall be in a location as determined by the City and/or the Region and are to be granted upon request at any time after the draft approval; 2.3.6 Construction Management Plan (a) that the owner make satisfactory arrangements with the City respecting a construction management plan, such Plan to contain, among other things: Recommended Conditions of Approval for Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Page 3 (i) details of erosion and sedimentation controls during all phases of construction and provide maintenance requirements to maintain these controls; (ii) addressing the parking of vehicles and the storage of construction and building, materials during servicing and house construction, and ensuring that such locations will not impede the flow of traffic or emergency vehicles on either existing streets or the proposed public street; (iii) insurance that the City's Noise By-law will be adhered to and that all contractors, trades and suppliers are advised of this By-law; (iv) the provision of mud and dust control on all roads within and adjacent to the site; (v) type and timing of construction fencing; (vi) location of construction trailers; (vii) details of the temporary construction access; 2.3.8 Development Charges (a) satisfaction of the City financially with respect to the Development Charges Act; 2.3.9 Coordinated Development (a) satisfaction of the City with respect to arrangements necessary to provide for coordination of services and roads with adjacent lands and any phasing of development that may be required; (b) satisfaction of the City with respect to the disposition of future development blocks and acquisition of abutting severed parcels prior to draft plan registration; (c) satisfaction of the City with respect to providing a second access to Brock Road until such time as proposed Street "A" is extended northward and intersects with an existing street and is open to public traffic; 2.3.10 Fencing (a) satisfaction of the City with respect to the provision of temporary fencing around the entire perimeter of the subject lands during construction, prior to the commencement of any works, (b) the owner agrees to submit a Landscape Fencing Plan, with respect to the provision of a noise attenuation fencing, to the satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department; (c) the owner agrees to install a fence next to the Village Green and valley lands to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering; Recommended Conditions of Approval for Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Page 4 19 2.3.11 Street Tree Planting (a) the submission of a street tree planting plan to the satisfaction of the City; 2.3.12 Architectural Control' (a) that the owner, prior to the preparation of the subdivision agreement, shall engage a control architect, to the satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department, who will prepare streetscape/architectural control guidelines to the City's satisfaction, approval all models offered for sale and certify that all building permit plans comply with the City's approved guidelines; (b) that the owner ensure that engineering plans are coordinated with the streetscape/architectural control guidelines and further that the engineering plans coordinate the driveway, street hardware and street trees to ensure that conflicts do not exist, asphalt is minimized and all objectives of the streetscape/architectural control guidelines can be achieved; (c) that the owner satisfy the City respecting the provision of appropriate aesthetic details and design of all boundary fencing and noise attenuation fencing; (d) that the subdivider provide a fixed payment satisfactory to the City to provide for the long term maintenance and repairs of items such as enhancements to fences, entrance feature walls, medians that exceed the City's normal standards and which are requested by the subdivider; 2.3.13 Noise Attenuation (a) that the owner satisfy the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment regarding the approval of a noise study recommending noise control features to the satisfaction of the Region of Durham, and the City of Pickering that addresses rail, road and any abutting industrial noises; 2.3.14 Engineering Drawings (a) that the owner satisfy the City respecting the submission of appropriate engineering drawings that detail, among other things, City services, roads, storm sewers, sidewalks, lot grading, streetlights, fencing and tree' planting, and financially-secure such works; (b) that the engineering plans be coordinated with the architectural design objectives; Recommended Conditions of Approval for Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Page 5 211 (c) that the subdivider revise the draft plan, as necessary to the satisfaction of the City to accommodate any unforeseen technical engineering issues which arise during the review of the final engineering drawings. Required revisions may include reducing the number of residential building lots or reconfiguring the roads or lots to the City's satisfaction; 2.3.15 Other Approval Agencies (a) that the subdivider satisfy.all the requirements of the Region of Durham; (b) that the subdivider satisfy all the requirements of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority; (c) that any approvals which are required from the Region of Durham or the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority for the development of this plan be obtained by the subdivider, and upon request written confirmation be provided to the City of Pickering as verification of these approvals; 2.3.16 Environmental Servicing Plan (a) that the subdivider satisfy, to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering, all matters required by the Duffin Heights Environmental Servicing Plan, including but not limited to the following:. (i) Functional Servicing and Stormwater Report; (ii) Monitoring Report; (iii) Compensation Report; (iv) Fish Habitat Restoration Fund contribution; (v) Watershed System Monitoring and Management Fund contribution; (vi) Adaptive Management Fund contribution; and, (vii) that the subdivider become a party to the cost sharing agreement for Duffin Heights and the Director, Planning & Development Department receives an acknowledgement from the Trustee of the Duffin Heights Landowners Group Inc. that the subdivider has made satisfactory arrangements to pay its proportion of the shared development cost; 2.3.17 Parkland Dedication (a) that the subdivider satisfy, to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering, that the Duffin Heights Master Parks Agreement has been entered into and executed that establishes the requirements and process for parkland dedication in accordance with the Planning Act for the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood; Recommended Conditions of Approval for Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Page 6 21 2.3.18 Phasing (a) that if this subdivision is to be developed by more than one registration, the subdivider will be required to submit a plan showing the proposed phasing, all to the satisfaction of the City; 2.3.19 Temporary Access (a) that the subdivider construct a temporary secondary emergency access at no cost to the City for this draft plan. The temporary access must be in a location and be designed to the satisfaction of the City. However, the subdivider acknowledges and agrees that if there is an opportunity in the future to/for the development of lands north of Street "A" in this draft plan, they may eliminate the need for a temporary access to the subject area by utilizing a future road system; 2.3.20 Easements for Off-Site City Facilities (a) that the subdivider satisfy to the satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department any required easement for works, facilities or use rights that are required by the City of Pickering. 2.4.21 . Construction Works (a) That the owner, forthwith upon receiving draft plan approval, confirm in a letter to the City and in a provision in the subdivision agreement that it will not commence any construction works (including site servicing, topsoil . stripping and grading) on the subject property until the works required for the construction of the Central Duffins Collector sanitary sewer have commenced. 2.4.22 Village Green Land Value (a) that the subdivider satisfy to the satisfaction of the Director, Planning & Development Department that the value of land for the Village Green has been appropriately recognized and compensated for in a cost sharing agreement. Appendix II to Report PD 01-10 22 Recommended Zoning By-Law Amendment Application A 16/08 THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING 23 BY-LAW NO. Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 3037 to implement the Pickering Official Plan in Part of Lot 18, Concession 3, City of Pickering (A16/08, SP-2008-08) WHEREAS the Ontario Municipal Board deems it desirable to permit the development of a range of single detached, semi-detached and multiple horizontal residential units, and open space on the subject lands being Part of Lot 18, Concession 3, in the City of Pickering; AND WHEREAS an amendment to By-law 3037, as amended, is therefore deemed necessary; NOW THEREFORE THE ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCHEDULE Schedule I attached hereto with notations and references shown thereon is hereby declared to be part of this By-law. 2. AREA RESTRICTED The provisions of this By-law shall apply to those lands in Part of Lot 18, Concession 3 in the City of Pickering, designated "S-SD-SA-3, "NP" and "OS-HL" on Schedule I. 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS No building, structure, land or part thereof shall hereafter be used, occupied, erected, moved or structurally altered except in conformity with the provisions of this By-law. 4. DEFINITIONS In this By-law, (1) "Bay, Bow, Box Window" shall mean a window that protrudes from the main wall, usually bowed, canted, polygonal, segmental, semicircular or square sided with window on front face in plan; one or more storeys in height, which may or may not include a foundation, may or may not include a window seat; and may include a door; By-law No. Page 2 2J2) "Corner Rounding" shall mean a lot line of a corner lot at the intersection of two street lines in the form of an arc, that joins the front lot line to the flankage lot line; (3) (a) "Dwelling" shall mean a building or part of a building containing one or more dwelling units, but does not include a mobile home or trailer; (b) "Dwelling Unit" shall mean one or more habitable rooms occupied or capable of being occupied as a single, independent and separate housekeeping unit containing a separate kitchen and sanitary facilities; (c) "Dwelling Single or Single Detached or Detached Dwelling" shall mean a dwelling containing one dwelling unit and uses accessory thereto which is freestanding from other main structures; (d) "Dwelling, Semi-Detached or Semi-Detached Dwelling" shall mean one of a pair of single dwellings, such dwellings being attached above grade by a common wall which extends from the base of the foundation to the roof line and for a horizontal distance of not less than 6 metres; (e) "Dwelling, Single Attached or Single Attached Dwelling" shall mean one of a group of not less than 3 adjacent dwellings,attached together horizontally by an above grade common wall; (4) (a) "Lot" shall mean an area of land fronting on a street which is used or intended to be used as the site of a building, or a group of buildings, as the case may be, together with an accessory buildings or structures, or a public park or open space area regardless of whether or not such lot constitutes the whole of a lot or block on a registered plan of subdivision. (b) "Lot Frontage" shall mean the width of a lot between the side lot lines measured along a line parallel to and 7,5 metres distant from the front lot line; (5) "Neighbourhood Park" shall mean a municipal public park; (6) "Private Garage" shall mean an enclosed or partially enclosed structure for the storage of one or more vehicles, in which structure no business or service is conducted for profit or otherwise; (7) "Street" shall mean a street as defined in the Highway Traffic Act, as amended from time to time, which may provides vehicular access to a lot. A private road registered in a plan of condominium is also considered a street for the purpose of this by-law By-law No. Page 3 25 (8) (a) "Yard" shall mean an area of land which is appurtenant to and located on the same lot as a building or structure and is open, uncovered and unoccupied above ground except for such accessory buildings, structures, or other uses as are specifically permitted thereon; (b) "Front Yard" shall mean a yard extending across the full width of a lot between the front lot line of the lot and the nearest wall of the nearest main building or structure on the lot; (c) "Front Yard Depth" shall mean the shortest horizontal dimension of a front yard of a lot between the front lot line and the nearest wail of the nearest main building or structure on the lot; (d) "Rear Yard" shall mean a yard extending across the full width of a lot between the rear lot line of the lot, or where there is no rear lot line, the junction point of the side lot lines, and the nearest wall of the nearest main building or structure on the lot; (e) "Rear Yard Depth" shall mean the shortest horizontal dimension of a rear yard of a lot between the rear lot line, or where there is no rear lot line the junction point of the side lot lines, and the nearest wall of the nearest main building or structure on the lot. (f) "Side Yard" shall mean a yard of a lot extending from the front yard to the rear yard and from the side line to the nearest wall of the nearest main building or structure on the lot; (g) "Side Yard Width" shall mean the shortest horizontal dimension of a side yard of a lot between the side lot line and the nearest wall of the nearest main building or structure on the lot; (h) "Flankage Side Yard" shall mean a side yard immediately adjoining a street or abutting on a reserve on the opposite side of which is a street; (i) "Flankage Side Yard Width" shall mean the shortest horizontal dimension of a flankage side yard of a lot between the lot line adjoining a street or abutting on a reserve on the opposite side of which is a street and the nearest wall of the nearest main building or structure on the lot; (j) "Interior Side Yard" shall mean a side yard other than a flankage side yard. By-law No. Page 4 6 5. PROVISIONS ("S-SD-SA-3" Zone) (1) Uses Permitted ("S-SD-SA-3" Zone) No person shall, within the lands designated "S-SD-SA-3" on Schedule attached hereto, use any lot or erect, alter or use any building or structure for any purpose except the following: (a) single dwelling; (b) semi-detached dwelling; (c) single attached dwelling; (2) Zone Requirements ("S-SD-SA-3") No person shall, within the lands designated ("S-SD-SA-3") on Schedule I attached hereto, use any lot or erect, alter or use any building or structure except in accordance with the provisions as set out in the following table. For a single dwelling the zoning provisions shall be based on the lot frontage with the exception of corner lots which will be based on the abutting lot size: 9.0 m 12.0 m 13.5 m semi- Street Lane single single single detached single single dwelling dwelling dwelling dwelling attached attached dwelling dwelling (a) Lot 9.0 m 12.0 m 13.5 m 7.5 m 6.0 m 6.0 m Frontage Minimum (b) Lot Area 225 m 300 m 335 m 180 m 150 m 170 m Minimum (c) Lot Depth 25 m 25 m 25 m 24.5 m 24.0 m 29.0 m Minimum (d) Front Yard 3.0 m 3.0 m 3.0 m 3.0 m 3.0 m 3.0 m Depth Minimum (e) Interior 1.2 m on 1.2 m on 1.2 m on 1.2 m, 1.2 m, 1.2 m, Side yard one side one side one side except except except Width and 0.6 m and 0.6 m and 0.6 m where where, where (Minimum) on the on the on the dwellings dwellings dwellings other side other side other side on on on and and and abutting abutting abutting provided provided provided lots share lots share lots share there is a there is a there is a a common a a minimum minimum minimum wall, no common common 1.2 m 1.2 m 1.2 m interior wall; no wall, no separation separation separation side yard interior interior between between between shall be side and side and By-law No. Page 5 27 dwellings dwellings dwellings required shall be shall be on adjacent on on adjacent required required lots; adjacent adjacent to that adjacent adjacent lots; lots; wall on to that to that either lot; wall on wall on either lot either lot (f) Flanking 2.4 m 2.4 m 2.4 m 2.4 m 2.4 m 2.4 m Side Yard Width Minimum (g) Rear Yard 7.0m 7.0m 7.0m 7.0m 7.0m 12.0m Depth Minimum (h) Building 12.0 m 12.0 m 12.0 m 13.0 m 13.0 m 13.0 m Height Maximum (i) Driveway 55 percent 55 percent 55 percent 50 50 50 Width percent percent percent Maximum Q) Lot 15m 15m 15m 15m 15m 15m Coverage of All Accessory Buildings Maximum The following special provisions shall be applicable-to all lands designated ("S-SD-SA-3") (k) Corner Rounding Setback (minimum): despite any front yard depth or flankage side yard width requirement; on a corner lot, the setback to a corner rounding shall be 1.75 metres; (1) Parking Requirement (minimum): two private parking spaces per dwelling unit which can be provided either within an attached garage or with one parking space in an attached garage and one parking space in a driveway immediately in front of the parking garage for that dwelling unit, (m) Garage Requirements (minimum): one private garage per lot attached to the main building, the vehicular entrance of which shall be located not less than 6.0 metres from the front lot line and not less than 6.0 metres from any side lot line immediately adjoining a street or abutting on a reserve on the opposite side of which is a street; By-law No. Page 6 G (n) Garage Parking Size (minimum): each parking space within a private garage shall have a minimum width of 2.9 metres and a minimum depth of 6.0 metres provided, however, that the width may include one interior step and the depth may include two interior steps; (o) Yard Encroachments: In addition to the provisions of Section 5.7 of By-law 3037, the following shall also apply: (i) a covered or uncovered porch, veranda or balcony and with or without a foundation, may have the following setbacks: A to front lot line: 1.0 metres; B to flankage lot line: 1.0 metres; C to interior side lot line: 0.6 metres; D to rear lot line: 5.0 metres; E to a corner rounding: 1.0 metres; F Eaves above these features may project: a further 0.6 metres into the required front, flankage or rear yard or corner rounding setback; (ii) uncovered steps minimum setback to a streetline: 0.4 metres (iii) uncovered decks of any height are permitted in the rear yard provided minimum setbacks are provided as follows: A to interior side lot line: 0.6 metres; B to flankage lot line: 1.0 metres; C to rear lot line: 3.0 metres;. D steps from a deck: may encroach an additional 1.2 metres onto the rear yard (iv) bay, bow or box windows may encroach a maximum into required yards as follows: A front yard: 0.6 metres; B flankage yard: 0.6 metres; C rear yard: 1.0 metres; D Eaves above these features: may project to a further 0.6 metres into the required front, flankage or rear yard; (p) Lane based Units that abut a Park or Village Green: Despite anything other provision in this By-law where a lot line for lane based single attached dwelling in a "S-SD-SA-3" zone abuts a Neighbourhood Park or Village Green, said lot line shall be deemed the front lot line; (q) Detached Garages for Lane Based Dwelling Units: A detached garage is not considered an accessory building for the purpose of lot coverage; By-law No. Page 7 29 (r) Detached Garage Requirements: Where the rear lot line abuts a street and vehicular access is provided from that street the following shall apply: (i) minimum side yard width of 0.0 metres; (ii) minimum flanking side yard width of 2.4 metres; (iii) minimum rear yard depth of 0.6 metres; (iv) a detached garage is not considered a main building for the purpose of the by-law. 6. PROVISIONS ("UR" Zone) (1) Uses Permitted ("UR" Zone) No person shall within the lands designated "UR" on Schedule I attached hereto use any lot or erect alter or use any building or structure for any purpose except for the following: (a) outdoor recreation uses without buildings or structures (b) existing lawful uses, located in existing buildings or structures, provided such use continue in the same manner and for the same purpose for'which they were uses on the day this by-law was passed; (c) temporary sales pavilion; (2) Zone Requirements ("UR" Zone) No person shall within the lands designated "UR" on Schedule l attached hereto, use any lot or erect alter or use any building or structure except in accordance with the following provisions: (a) Building Height (maximum): 13.0 metres; (b) Setback to all lot lines (minimum): 7.0 metres; (c) Parking requirements for temporary sales pavilion (minimum): 10 spaces; 7. PROVISIONS ("OS-HL" Zone) (1) Uses Permitted ("OS-HL" Zone) No person shall within the lands designated "OS-HL" on Schedule I attached hereto use,any lot or erect, alter or use any building or structure except the following: (a) resource management, including a stormwater management facility; (b) pedestrian and bicycle trails; By-law No. Page 8 (2) Zone Requirements ("OS-HL" Zone) No buildings or structures shall be permitted to be erected except where buildings or structures are used only for purposes of resource management, including a stormwater management facility; pedestrian and/or bicycle trails. 8. PROVISIONS ("NP" Zone") (1) Uses Permitted ("NP" Zone) No person shall within the lands designated "NP" on Schedule I attached hereto use any lot or.erect, alter or use any building or structure for any purpose except the following: (a) neighbourhood park. 9. MODEL HOMES (1) . Notwithstanding any provisions in By-law 3037 to the contrary, a maximum of 6 Model Homes, together with not fewer than two parking spaces per Model Home, may be constructed on the lands set out in Schedule I attached to this By-law prior to the division of those lands by registration of a plan of subdivision; (2) For the purposes of this By-law, "Model Home" shall mean a dwelling unit which is not used for residential purposes, but which is used exclusively for sales, display and marketing purposes pursuant to an agreement with the City of Pickering. 10. BY-LAW 3037 By-law 3037 is hereby amended only to the extent necessary to give effect to the provisions of this By-law as it appears to the area set out in Schedule I attached hereto. Definitions and subject matter not specifically dealt with in this By-law shall be governed by relevant provisions of By-law 3037, as amended. 11. EFFECTIVE DATE This By-law shall come into force in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. _ I 31 I 1 I I I I I I 162.4m 3 NP L OLD TAUNTON ROAD 82Am 78.5m 38.8 91.3m 25.3m tO 3 ~ - 3 -I o ~ r ~ o Q 3 STREET 'C' m X 0 3 Y 25.7m O CON 3 PT LOT 8, 40R 1900055 ART 1-.4 m STREET 'C' 3 3 3 P 118.5m 27.3m 59.4m J 3 STREET 'B' 120.8m I I I I N SCHEDULE I TO BY-LAW PASSED THIS DAY OF 2010 I ATTACHMENT #-TO RENURT # PD--CJ 32 ROAD TAUNTON ~ti~~ 090 FpNB K TREEi HUAL) i O~ PJ SUBJEC PROPER MACPHERSON y CONTRACTING U LTD. O m GAT F C~,A F~ 4 /NDU CULTURAL C rAr MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS CENTRE DERStN STREET City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CON 3 PT LOT 18 07\ OWNER LEBOVIC ENTERPRISES LTD. DATE DEC. 4, 2009 DRAWN BY JB FILE No. SP2008-08, A016/08 SCALE 1:5000 CHECKED BY RP H c. rc T-..Enterpriasa. inc. ontl ;ta aupplara. All rghta Rsasrvetl. ".I. plan pt au-ey. PN-15 c 2005 "PAC - its' suppl lars. All rights Rcaervetl. Not a plan of Survey. ATTACHMENT # L TO REPORT # PD APPLICANT'S ORIGINAL SUBMITTED 3 3 DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION SP 2008-08 & A 16/08 - LEBOVIC ENTERPRISES LIMITED OLD TAUNTON ROAD {BI:Of, i ) r ao. 1~ a51 re~bc~ d1 ' , ~ 25 1 1 9T,H I J 7 ~ ~5~T,N I ~ 2 t! ~ 1 I t l l R--_" . 21 28 3 i N+ILwaI i611~~77fK451 5 gam- ' J~8 Q i t9 { ~t t E fi~T t ~5 2 fi Q i_ + 1 P .....6....~._A o QcK 5[1 _ i 330 y 4 T 4T- _ g- 31 32 - i 8-.p7LFK5 I iLo1 3 1 t O Qbt 3 1 817 i dTN 1 4Q!7 :N 1 I i I 1, I ~.AL eP ~ 15 Y r SIT.H t i 'RH.1. i 36 3 1 ff~o xn~ i 144&i 'PLOCK48 1 ?3 u~~ 39 I I: eI TLI 1 I61T~ P I ,s k. F~. I 1 1 i 1 1 I 1 14G u;,S I 4o I(((ll ~ 1 THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN, AUGUST 12, 2008. ATTACHMENT ~ TO REPORT # PD 01._10 INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S 34 SUBMITTED PLAN ONTARIO REALTY CORPORATION (EAST). SP-2008-10 & A 020/08 ~d• I III •a .e6-19 s I V PETRD o PART 2, PLAN 40R-833 CANADA i w 4 LOCI~at]~ same J, I S ce E d II.I LOGN 7 t L C 1 O K 2 Future"R.O.W. Shore rl. T (0.125ho-0.31oc.) 0.4 &4 6.4 OLD POST s xr E FENCE DON MACPHERSON B" PART 7 6.4 Q4 ).9 ).9 8A ).9 ).9 6A 6.4 9J CONTRACTING LTD. B O K S BL c 4 B o K 3 Qe ^ s r.. 3 H r PLAN 40R - 2114 - ORC b PART 6 Future R.O.W. Shore Y$k o (0.026ho-0.06oc.) Ultimate J TIS CONS. ETD. 22.Om width Other rids wrn d 5 PART 1 F u t u r e C o n e c o /I t FUTURE SCHOOL SITE (1.739 ho - 4.30 oc.) J~ KAHN ADCT 7 1.~ Q,P~ o Existing LTD. Future R.O.W. Shore 6 7esiden tiol (0.111 h a- 0.27oc.) L Existing r. Commercial \ Ex' ing O If Club j Y L House 0 0 Future R.O.W. Shore (0.132ha-0.336c.) PLAN 4 rQe 383 CD PIN - 0016 P Existing PART 3 Residential PART 2 - da PLAN 40R - 10383 O M A T T A M Y 1a99z `1 NJI)S'b'E 2V2 NEIGHBOURHOOD PARK PART 4, PLAN 20R .3m Reserv PART ® PLAN 20R - 2114 _ BLOCK 10 FUTURE MMIXED US O. PQIRJ272ha 4.. ad.) ^ \ Ex. es rc 'V FULL SCALE COPIES OF THE APPLICANTS SUBMITTED PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, INFORMATION & SUPPORT SERVICES OCTOBER 8, 2008. ATTACHMENT - TO REPORT # PD ©1-10 INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S 5 REVISED(JUNE 2009) SUBMITTED PLAN LEBOVIC ENTERPRISES LTD. S P-2008-08 & A 016/08 EYW eOCeen -I.,. Vmoq. ~ OLD TAUNTON ROAD 7 I °..~R6 ~ a 6 [ 9' aR s~ III 8 s e ' a T. • T.w, e t i R ' .R HZ s ns a o.,. a• c_; D • 9 Ell r s. _ e 6 E dj n t as.,. R •n. a «s. e aha a. II0 Future R.O.W. Share ' } (0. 125ho-O.Jfm.) T TT z 3 •i _ E Future R.O.W. share 'a (O.026ho-a O6ac.) aa ibnatR R.0.e. Waln ' ZZ.On c U r e C O FT FI 6 C I O i FUTURE SCHOOL SITE (1.739 ho - 4.30 oc.) - E.41ing Future R.O.W, Share Residential E+istinq (O.Iliho-0.270C.) Conn-sia Future R.O.W. Share (0. IJ2no-0. JJoc.) 3 E.fslinq . Residential .msxs ap ut zr.Sn E g 6~ M FUTURE MIXED USE l..aSn Mss... N FULL SCALE COP/£S OF THE APPUGiNT'S SUBMITTED PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, INFORMATION & SUPPORT SERVICES, JUNE 9, 2009. ATTACHMENT # 5 TO REPORT # PD 01-10 36 STAFF RECOMMENDED PLAN FOR REVISED(JUNE 2009) SUBMITTED PLAN LEBOVIC ENTERPRISES LTD. SP-2008-08 & A 016/08 Cl. R.O.W. To Be Gosea ♦¢y amre wrage aeea OLD TAUNTON ROAD - ..~5 E T 9 fi.A sac L T ~T A ~ 5 m s R L 4 bG Future R.O.W. Share- `L (0. 125ha-0.31oc.) 7 7 } ~ B Fatwe R.O.W. Snare (0.026na-O.O6oc.) R a• R.o.w.~Wgm Fj; U r e C o n n e r / O NT RE SCHOOL 9TE (L739 ha - 4.30 oc) E+1s1Mq Future R.O.W. Sham . ResiCmtiol E+iatinq (0.111ho-0.27oc.) - Commerciol .E Future R.O.W Aare (0.132ho-0.33oc.) E+latinq ResiAmtiel a NNRE YIx D USE -07\ •Y FULL SCALE COP/ES OF THE APPLICANTS SUBMITTED PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PIANN/NC & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, INFORMATION & SUPPORT SERVICES, NOV 3, 2009. Barristers & Solicitors WeirFouldSLLP ATTACHMENT #___,6 To REPORT # PD 1VO years 37 September 24, 2009 Michael J. McQuaid, Q.C. T: 416-947-5020 mcquaid@weirfoulds.com ' VIA FACSIMILE AND MAIL File 00056.00038 Debi Wilcox City Clerk City of Pickering One The Esplanade Pickering, ON L1V 61<7 Dear Ms. Wilcox: Re: Notice of Appeal - Lebovic Enterprises Limited Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 16/08. y0raftPlan of Subdivision Application SP-2008-08 We act on behalf of Lebovic Enterprises Limited ("Lebovic") with respect to its lands located on Part of Lot 18, Concession 3 in the City of Pickering,, commonly. referred to as the "Bradshaw Property". These lands are part of the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood. On July 17, 2008 Lebovic submitted Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision applications for the above noted lands. These applications were amended by letter dated June 9, 2009, to include the former. ORC property located to the south of the Bradshaw Property, which had just been acquired by Lebovic. To-date, the Council of the City of Pickering has failed to make a decision on these applications. On behalf of our client, we hereby appeal Council's failure to make a decision on these two applications to the Ontario Municipal Board, pursuant to subsection 34(11) and 51(34) of the Planning Act, R.S.O: 1990, c.P.13, as amended. The proposed development is located within the area subject to Official Plan Amendment 18 ("OPA 18"), which was recently adopted by the City of Pickering. OPA 18 has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board by another party, and we would request that this appeal be consolidated with that appeal, if necessary. We are also aware that Mattamy (Brock Road) Limited has appealed Council's refusal of Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision applications for their lands which are also located within the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood. Accordingly, we would ask that our clients appeal, also be consolidated with the Mattamy (Brock Road) appeal. T:41'6-365-1110 P:416-365-1876 The Exchange Tower, Suite 1600. P.O. Box 480, 130 King Street West Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5X U5 www.weirfoulds.com Barristers & Solicitors ATTACHMENT TO WeirFoUldSLLP REPORT # PD ___0 " I 15O 3 B years The reasons for this appeal are as follows: Lebovic, Mattamy and the other land owners in the Duffin Heights area have been in discussions with the Region of Durham. The purpose of these discussions is to reach a front- ending servicing agreement whereby the developers would advance funds to the Region, to allow for the construction of required services for the area. Prudent practice would suggest that a developer should have its plan draft approved when a commitment of major funds for. such a front-end agreement are advanced. Accordingly, Lebovic would like to see its plans proceed to draft approval in the same time frame as the Mattamy plans. In addition, we believe the City has raised certain planning issues regarding the Mattamy appeal respecting sustainable urban development guidelines which may bear on the Lebovic plans and the matters should be consolidated so that these issues are-dealt with in the most efficient manner. We look forward to receiving notice that this appeal and the supporting material has been sent to the Ontario Municipal Board for further processing Yours truly, Wei Foulds LLP Mi ha~l . Mc uaid, c: 'Chas Barnett 2 ATTACHMENT # 7 To REPORT # PD ©I -113 39 City o~ ICI ICKERING INFORMATION REPORT NO. 19-08 FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING OF September 29, 2008 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLANNING ACT, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13 SUBJECT: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 16/08 Lebovic Enterprises Limited Part Lot 18, Concession 3 City of Pickering 1.0 PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION - the subject lands are located east of Brock Road, south of Old Taunton Road; - a property location map is provided for reference (see Attachment #1); the existing use of the property is residential and commercial, being a detached dwelling and the commercial being "Bradshaw Towing and Storage" therefore a portion of the property is used for open storage; the north-west corner of the property was previously used as a automobile service station, however this use closed years ago and the majority of this property is now owned by the Region of Durham and has been used for the reconstruction/realignment of Brock Road and Old Taunton Road; the majority of the subject -property is sparsely vegetated with only the eastern portion of the property containing natural vegetation on lands associated with the buffer lands of the Urfe Creek; the majority of the site's topography is relatively flat with a slope to the east on the eastern portion of land where the land drops off toward the Urfe Creek valley; - surrounding land uses are: north - on the opposite side of Old Taunton Road are residential properties; south - open storage yard related to Macpherson Contracting and a portion of the Seaton Golf Course (this portion of the golf course is proposed to be developed for residential purposes); east - wood lot, open space; west - on the opposite side of Brock Road are residential properties; - the property located at the south-west corner of the subject property is a vacant parcel. ATTACHMENT # 7 - o Information Report No. 19-08 REPORT # PD D 1-10 Page 2 n 2.0 APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL the owner of the subject lands has submitted an application for approval of a draft plan of subdivision and an application to amend the zoning by-law in order to implement the proposed. draft plan; - the draft plan of subdivision proposes to create 28 lots for detached dwellings, 12 lots for 24 semi-detached dwellings, 14 blocks for 83 lots for townhouse dwelling units and an open space block (see Attachment #2 - Submitted Plan); - all of the proposed lots will front onto new municipal streets or lanes; - the detached dwellings and semi-detached dwellings are generally proposed in the eastern portion of the plan and the townhouses are generally in the western portion of the draft plan; - with the development of this draft plan the western leg of Old Taunton Road is to be stopped up and closed and the road will be realigned southerly through the draft plan; - the following chart outlines the proposed development detail: Details of the Applications Total area of draft plan - 5.35 hectares Residential lots - 3.17 hectares Municipal road and lanes - 1.37 hectares Open Space - 0.80 hectares Number of detached dwelling lots - 9.0 m lot frontage = 15 - 11.0 m lot frontage = 13 Number of semi-detached dwellings - 24 Rear lane townhouse dwelling units - 6.0 m lot frontage = 37 Street townhouse dwelling units - 6.0 m lot frontage = 17 - 7.2 m lot frontage = 29 Total dwelling units - 135 Net residential density - 42.4 units per hectare 3.0 OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING 3.1 Durham Regional Official Plan - the Durham Regional Official Plan designates the subject lands as Living Areas, which are intended to be used predominantly for housing purposes; - for the lands that front onto Brock Road they are designated as Regional Corridor which are intended to be developed as mixed use areas, which include residential, commercial and service areas with higher densities supporting higher order transit services and featuring a high degree of pedestrian oriented design; - the Region of Durham is currently processing Regional Official Plan amendments for the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood and until these amendments are concluded upon the. conformity of the applications with the entire Regional Official Plan is yet to be determined; ATTACHMENT #~TO Information Report No. 19-08 REPORT # PD_ C> - i d Page 3 41 3.2 Pickering Official Plan - the Pickering Official Plan designates the subject lands as Mixed Use Areas - Mixed Corridors, Urban Residential Areas - Medium Density Areas and Open Space System - Natural Areas; - Mixed Use Areas - Mixed Corridors are intended to be developed for offices, retailing of goods and services generally serving the needs of the surrounding neighbourhoods and residential uses; - the Mixed Use Areas - Mixed Corridors designation requires development to comply with a residential density of over 30 units up to and including 140 units per net hectare and a floor space index of 2.5 FSI; permissible uses within the Urban Residential Areas - Medium Density Areas designation include, among others, residential uses and community and cultural uses as well as limited office commercial uses; - the Pickering Official Plan establishes a density range of over 30 and up to and including 80 dwelling units per hectare for development within an Urban Residential Area - Medium Density Area; - the proposed development provides a net density of 42.4 units per hectare for the proposed residential development; for the Urban Residential Area - Medium Density Area land only the density is 39.3 units per hectare and for the Mixed Use Areas - Mixed Corridors lands that are proposed for development the density is 45.5 units per hectare; - the lands that are designated Open Space - Natural Area represent lands that are associated with the valley lands for the Urfe Creek; - permissible uses within land designated Open Space - Natural Area include conservation, environmental protection, restoration and passive recreation; - Schedule 11 of the Pickering Official Plan - Transportation Systems, designates Brock Road as a Type A Arterial Road and a Transit Spine; - Type A Arterial Roads are designed to carry large volumes of traffic at moderate to high speeds, have some access restrictions and generally have a right-of-way width ranging from 36 to 50 metres; - Transit Spine are recognized corridors where high levels of transit service is to be encouraged; - Schedule 11 of the Pickering Official Plan also shows both Old Taunton Road and proposed Street "A" as Collector Road; - Schedule 111 of the Pickering Official Plan - Resource Management designates part of the subject lands as Shorelines and Stream Corridors; - Shorelines and Stream Corridors identify lands that may be prone to flooding, slope instability and/or erosion impacts and require an environmental report to be submitted that addresses environmental constraints on the subject property; - the City has adopted the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines that apply to the subject lands (see Section 3.3); - the Official Plan requires an environmental report be undertaken prior to any development in the Neighbourhood (see Section 3.4); - the applications will be assessed against the policies, and provisions of the Pickering Official Plan during the further processing of the applications; ATTACHMENT # 7 TO Information Report No. 19-08 REPORT # PD C LIO Page 4 3.3 Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines - the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines as adopted by City Council on April 22, 2003, are currently being reviewed and its anticipated that revisions to the existing Guidelines will follow the amendment to the Official Plan to implement the Environmental Servicing Plan; the current Guidelines establish guiding principles to create a cluster of separate but linked nodes of residential centred around a mixed use corridor; the subject lands form part of one of the linked residential nodes; the applications will be assessed against the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines during the further processing of the applications; 3.4 Duffin Heights Environmental Servicing Plan - the City of Pickering Official Plan requires the completion of an Environmental Servicing Plan (ESP) prior to approving any detailed development plans; - the Duffin Heights landowner's group has undertaken the ESP; - the ESP reviewed the road patterns and land use designations along with the review of the environmental and servicing considerations; - the ESP recommends amendments to both the Region and City Official Plans that includes changing land use designations and road designations; - the Duffin Heights Landowner's Group has made an application to the Region of Durham to amend it's Official Plan to delete two segments of Type C arterial roads in Duffin Heights and to realign the future extension of Valley Farm Road, a Type C arterial road north of the Third Concession Road; - it is anticipated that the City will initiate an Official Plan Amendment to reflect the policy changes required to implement the ESP recommendations; 3.5 Zoning By-law 3037 - the subject lands are currently zoned "A - Agricultural Zone by Zoning By-law 3037; - the existing zoning permits a range of agricultural uses, one detached dwelling, some recreational and community uses, and selected agricultural commercial uses; - an amendment to the zoning by-law is required to allow the development of the proposed plan of subdivision; - the applicant has requested an appropriate zone that would permit the proposed development. 4.0 RESULTS OF CIRCULATION 4.1 Resident Comments - no resident comments have been received to date; Information Report No. 19-08 ATTACHMENT #__2_T0 REPORT # Po 0 LID Page 5 43 4.2 Agency Comments the following agencies or departments advised they have no objection to the applications: Durham District School Board; Enbridge Pipelines; Veridian Connections; Enbridge Gas Distribution (see Attachments #3 to #6); 4.3 Staff Comments - in reviewing the applications to date, the following matters have been identified by staff for further review and consideration: • we anticipate Council's endorsement of the ESP and changes to the City's Official Plan and Development Guidelines; therefore these applications will require review with the new Official Plan policies and guidelines; • ensuring that the proposed development is compatible with, and sensitive to, existing surrounding development and provides appropriate tree preservation and/or Natural Heritage Compensation; • reviewing the applications in terms of its level of sustainable development components; • concluding arrangements . respecting the provisions of appropriate stormwater management facilities to service this development; • concluding early construction by developers of the north-south collector road (William Jackson Drive) from the subject lands southerly to ensure appropriate traffic patterns for the neighbourhood is provided; • ensuring the proposed road design, lotting pattern, mixed use block and housing variety and mix are the most appropriate for the subject lands; • securement of appropriate arrangements for the construction of trails and a future village green by developers on lands owned by ORC and on the Old Taunton road allowance; • reviewing the layout of the draft plan as it relates to the abutting property that is zoned for an automobile service station with a car wash to ensure there will be sufficient separation so any conflicting land use impacts can be appropriately mitigated; • reviewing supporting technical submissions and reports to ensure that adequate information is provided, that technical requirements are met and that the proposed development design does not impact on the ability of abutting properties to develop in an appropriate fashion; the Planning & Development Department will conclude its position on the applications after it has received and assessed comments from the circulated departments, agencies and public an d the conclusion of the official plan amendment applications that effect the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood. ATTACHMENT Information Report No. 19-08 REPORT # PD 01-16 TO Page 6 Q c~ 5.0 PROCEDURAL INFORMATION - written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning & Development Department; - oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting; - all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Council or a Committee of Council; - if you wish to be notified of Council's decision regarding either the proposed plan of subdivision or zoning by-law amendment application, you must request such in writing to the City Clerk; - if a person or public body that files an appeal of a decision of the City of Pickering in respect of the proposed draft plan of subdivision and/or zoning by-law amendment, does not make oral submissions at the public meeting or make written submissions to the City of Pickering before -the draft plan of subdivision application is considered for approval, or before the zoning by-law is passed, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal; if you wish to reserve-the option to appeal Council's decision of the proposed zoning by-law amendment application, you must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this proposal. 6.0 OTHER INFORMATION 6.1 Appendix No. I list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City Departments that have commented on the' applications at the time of writing the report; 6.2 Information Received full scale copies of the applicant's submitted plan and reports are available for viewing at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department including: • the draft plan of subdivision; • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by Geo-Canada, dated December 2007; the need for additional information and/or addendums to submitted reports will be determined through the review and circulation of the applicant's current proposal; ATTACHMENT #--2-TO Information Report No. 19-08 REPORT # PD b l /0 Page 7 ~r 6.3 Owner / Applicant Information the owners of the subject lands are Lebovic Enterprises Limited; - the applications have been submitted by Glen Easton of Sernas Associates Limited on behalf of Lebovic Enterprises Limited; Lloyd Cherniak represents Lebovic Enterprises Limited. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Ross Pym MCIP, RPP Lynda Taylor, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner - Development Review Manager, Development Review RP:cs Attachments Copy: Director, Planning & Development ATTACHMENT #--2--To 46 REPORT # PD (01`16 APPENDIX NO. I TO INFORMATION REPORT NO. 19-08 COMMENTING RESIDENTS AND LANDOWNERS (1) none received to date COMMENTING AGENCIES (1) Durham District School Board (2) Enbridge Pipelines (3) Veridian Connections (4) Enbridge Gas Distribution COMMENTING CITY DEPARTMENTS (1) none received to date ATTACHMENT #--L-TO REPORT # PD_ C~ l I1 Special Planning & Development 47 _ Committee Meeting Minutes PIUKERING Monday, September 29, 2008 7:30 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor McLean PRESENT: Mayor Ryan COUNCILLORS: D. Dickerson B. Littley B. McLean J. O'Connell D. Pickles ABSENT: Councillor Johnson - Federal Business ALSO PRESENT: T.J. Quinn - Chief Administrative Officer N. Carroll - Director, Planning & Development T. Melymuk - Director, Office of Sustainability G. Paterson - Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer L. Taylor - Manager, Development Review R: Pym - Principal Planner, Development Review G. McGregor- Principal Planner, Policy D. Shields . -Deputy Clerk - (1) PART W- PLANNING INFORMATION MEETING 1. Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2005-04 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 36/05 Cougs (Tillings) Ltd. Part Lot 20, Concession 3, City of Pickering 2. City of Pickering Official Plan Amendment OPA-081001 P Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-01 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 01/08 Mattamy (Brock Rd) Limited Part of Lots 17 & 18. Concession 3, City of Pickering 1 ATTACHMENT #__&9___ M REPORT # PD_ Q /-ID 48 Cra, 00 Special Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes Monday,. September 29, 2008 7:30 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor McLean 3. Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 16/08 Lebovic Enterprises Limited Part of Lot 18, Concession 3, City of Pickering. 4. Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-09 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 17/08 Ontario Realty Corporation Part of Lot 20, Concession 3, City of Pickering A public information meeting was held under the Planning Act, for the purpose of informing the public with respect to the above noted applications. Lynda Taylor, Manager, Development Review gave an outline of the requirements. for a Statutory Meeting under the Planning Act. She also noted that if a person or public body does not make oral or written submissions to the City before by-laws are passed, that person or public body are not entitled to appeal the decision of City Council to the Ontario Municipal Board, and may not be entitled to be added as a party to the hearing unless, in the opinion of the Board, there are reasonable grounds to do so. Ross Pym, Principal Planner, Development Review, gave an overview of all zoning amendment applications noted above. Ross Pym, Principal Planner stated that they had received concerns from Kahn's Auction Centre on how the developments would affect their private services. He noted that Kahn's Action Centre stated that their private services work very well at this time and wanted to ensure this continued. Gary Templeton and Bryce Jordan representatives for the applicants appeared before the Committee in-support of the applications and to respond to any questions that may arise. Mr. Pistritto, appeared before the Committee and questioned how the developments would affect the wildlife corridor that existed in the area. Greg Hewit, appeared before the Committee and questioned how long it would be before the development started and when he would have to move. Tanya Hatley., appeared before the Committee representing her father Gerry McCoy and questioned what the developments would do to his well and 2 ATTACHMENT # TO REPORT # PD_ 6 /-l D C,a! 04 Special Planning &Development 4 9 Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, September 29, 2008. 7:30 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor McLean whether studies had been done regarding the environment and noise, along with what impact this would have on his property. Gary Templeton noted that the wildlife corridor had been considered in their. plans and thought the link was along side the forested area and valley lands. Bryce Jordan stated that the timeline for terminating leases would be approximately one to two years but noted that the property owner would be having further discussions with tenants. Mr. Jordan also stated that he felt the development located near his client's property would not have an impact on. the lands and noted that he felt the City owned lands would affect the McCoy property more than these developments. ATTACHMENT # 9 TO REPORT # PD_ City o~ ICI I I PICKERING INFORMATION REPORT NO. 01-09 FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING OF February 2, 2009 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLANNING ACT, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13 SUBJECT: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-10 Zoning By-law. Amendment Application A 20/08 Ontario Realty Corporation Part Lot 17 and 18, Concession 3 j City of Pickering 1.0 PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION _ - the subject lands are located on the east side of Brock Road, north of the Hydro corridor and south of Old Taunton Road; - a property location map is provided for reference (see Attachment #1); - the property was previously part of the Seaton Golf Course and the subject lands were used this past summer for golf purposes; - it is staffs understanding that the remaining portion of the Seaton Golf Course will be reconfigured and continue to operate in the future as a nine hole golf course; - the majority of the subject property is a typical golf course containing manicured turf grasses with appropriately placed mature trees; - the Durham Region Land Division Committee, on September 8, 2008, conditionally approved an application (file LD 115/08) to create the subject parcel of land from a larger holding of land owned by Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC) and the site is currently for sale; - the site's topography is relatively flat with a gentle slope to the east; - surrounding land uses are: north - residential and commercial, being a detached dwelling and the commercial being "Bradshaw Towing and Storage"; that is proposed to be developed by plan of subdivision SP-2008-08; south - a portion of the Seaton Golf Course (this portion of the golf course is proposed to be developed as a future school site); east - Urfe Creek valley lands and the remainder of the Seaton Golf Course; west - open storage yard related to Macpherson Contracting. ATTACHMENT # 9 TO Information Report No. 01-09 REPORT.1 PD- © Page 2 J~ 2.0 APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL the owner of the subject lands has submitted an application for approval of a draft plan of subdivision and an application to amend the zoning by-law in order to implement the proposed draft plan; the draft plan of subdivision proposes to create 5 blocks to be subsequently divided for 22 street townhouse dwelling units, an open space block and municipal roads (see Attachment #2 - Applicant's Submitted Plan); all of the proposed lots will front onto new municipal streets; - the draft plan contains a portion (eastern half) of Street "A" (William Jackson Drive) that will connect the subject draft plan with the proposed draft plan of subdivision to the south (Mattamy Homes) and the plan to the north (Lebovic Enterprises Limited); - it is noted that additional lands will be required for the western portion of Street "A" (William Jackson Drive) from abutting land owners and initial discussions with the landowners have occurred; - the following chart outlines the proposed development detail: Details of the Applications Total area of draft plan - 1.09 hectares Townhouse blocks - 0.48 hectares Municipal roads - 0.58 hectares Open Space - 0.01 hectares Street Townhouse dwelling units - 6.4 m lot frontage = 22 Net residential density - 45.4 units per hectare 3.0 OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING 3.1 Durham Regional Official Plan - the Durham Regional Official Plan designates the subject lands as Living Areas, which are intended to be used predominantly for housing purposes; - Living Areas shall be developed in a compact form through higher densities and by intensifying and redeveloping existing areas; - the subject applications will be assessed against the policies and provisions of the Durham Region Official Plan during the further processing of the applications; 3.2 Pickering Official Plan - the Pickering Official Plan designates the subject lands as Urban Residential Areas - Medium Density Areas; - permissible. uses within the Urban Residential Areas - Medium Density Areas designation include, among others, residential uses and community and cultural uses as well as limited office commercial uses; ATTACHMENT # TO Information Report No. 01-09 REPORT # PD b l-lD Page 3 52 - the Pickering Official Plan establishes a density range of over 30 and up to and including 80 dwelling units per hectare for development within an Urban Residential Area -Medium Density Area; the proposed development provides a net density of approximately 45.4 units per hectare; - the subject lands are within the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood of the Official Plan; , - Schedule II of the Pickering Official Plan Transportation Systems designates Street "A" (William Jackson Drive) that will provide access to the draft plan as a Collector Road; Collector Roads are designed to carry lower volumes of traffic at lower speeds than high order arterial roads while providing access to properties; - the City has adopted the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines that apply to the subject lands (see Section 3.3); the Official Plan requires an environmental report be. undertaken prior to any development in the Neighbourhood (see Section 3.4); the applications will be assessed against the policies and provisions of the Pickering Official Plan during the further processing of the applications; 3.3 Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines - the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines as. adopted by City Council on April 22, 2003, are currently being reviewed and it is anticipated that revisions to the existing Guidelines will follow the amendment to the Official Plan to implement the Environmental Servicing Plan; - the current Guidelines establish guiding principles to create a cluster of separate but linked nodes of residential development centred around a mixed use corridor; - the subject lands form part of one of the linked residential nodes; - the applications will be assessed against the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Development Guidelines during the further processing of the applications; 3.4 Duffin Heights Environmental Servicing Plan - the City of Pickering Official Plan requires the completion of an Environmental Servicing Plan (ESP) prior to approving any detailed development plans; - the Duffin Heights landowner's group undertook the ESP; - City Council on October 23, 2008 endorsed the recommendations of the ESP; - the ESP reviewed the road patterns and land use designations along with the review of the environmental and servicing considerations; - the ESP recommends amendments to both the Region and City Official Plans that includes changing land use designations and road designations; - the Duffin Heights Landowner's Group has received approval from the Region of Durham to amend it's Official Plan to change some of the road designations in Duffin Heights; Information Report No. 01-09 ATTACHMENT #__±_T0 REPORT # Po al-iD Page 4 53 - City Council has authorized staff to initiate an Official -Plan Amendment and revisions to the Duffin Heights Development Guidelines to implement land use, transportation and environmental recommendations of ESP; - as a result of the recommendations of the ESP to amend the Official Plan and Development Guidelines, an assessment of the subject applications compliance with the policies and provisions of the Pickering Official Plan will need to take the authorized changes into account ; 3.5 Zoning By-law 3037 - the subject lands are currently zoned "02-GC Open Space - Golf Course by Zoning By-law 3037; - the existing zoning permits a golf course and a variety of open space recreational uses; - an amendment to the zoning by-law is required to allow the development of the proposed plan of subdivision; - the applicant has requested an appropriate zone that would permit the proposed development. 4.0 RESULTS OF CIRCULATION 4.1 Resident Comments - no resident comments have been received to date; 4.2 Agency Comments - the following agencies or departments advised they have no objection to the applications: Durham District School Board; Enbridge Gas Distribution; Canada Post; Hydro One Networks; Durham Catholic District School Board; Veridian Connections and Bell (see Attachments #3 to #9); - Conseil scolaire de district du Centre-Sud-Ouest advised of their request for a school site in the area and has requested that as a condition of approval that a school site(s) be concluded to the satisfaction of Conseil scolaire de district du Centre-Sud-Ouest (see Attachment #10); 4.3 Staff Comments in reviewing the applications to date, the following matters have been identified by staff for further review and consideration: • reviewing the applications in terms of the authorized changes to the City's Official Plan and Development Guidelines; • ensuring that the proposed development is compatible with, and sensitive to, existing surrounding development and provides appropriate tree preservation and/or Natural Heritage Compensation; ATTACHMENT if Information Report No. 01-09 REPORT # PD_ Q TO Page 5 54 • reviewing the applications in terms of its level of sustainable development components including a required report that demonstrates how the site development and building design /construction is consistent with the City's Sustainable Development Guidelines; • concluding arrangements respecting functional servicing and storm water management facilities to service this development; • concluding the ultimate alignment and early construction by developers of Street "A" the north-south collector road (William Jackson Drive) to ensure appropriate traffic patterns for the neighbourhood are provided; • ensuring the proposed road design, lotting pattern and housing variety and mix are the most appropriate for the subject lands; • securement of appropriate arrangements for the construction of trails on lands owned by ORC that abut the draft plan of subdivision; • reviewing supporting technical submissions and reports to ensure that adequate information is provided, that technical requirements are met and that the proposed development design does not impact on the ability of abutting properties to develop in an appropriate fashion; the Planning & Development Department will conclude its position on the applications after it has received and assessed comments from the circulated departments, agencies and public and the conclusion of the Official Plan amendment applications that effect the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood. 5.0 PROCEDURAL INFORMATION - written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning & Development Department; - oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting; - all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Council or a Committee of Council; - if you wish to be notified of Council's decision regarding either the proposed plan of subdivision or zoning by-law amendment application, you must request such in writing to the City Clerk; - if a person or public body that files an appeal of a decision of the City of Pickering in respect of the proposed draft plan of subdivision and/or zoning by-law amendment, does not make oral submissions at the public meeting or make written submissions to the City of Pickering before the draft plan of subdivision application is considered for approval, or before the zoning by-law is passed, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal; - if you wish to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision of the proposed zoning by-law amendment application, you must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this proposal. Information Report No. 01-09 ATTACHMENTREPORT # Pp# a _ Page 6 6.0 OTHER INFORMATION 6.1 Appendix No. - list of-neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing the report; 6.2 Information Received - full scale copies of the applicant's submitted plan and reports are available for viewing at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department including: • the draft plan of subdivision; • Noise Assessment, prepared by Sernas associates, dated January 18, 2008; • Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by. MMM Group Limited, dated October 2007; the need for additional information and/or addendums to submitted reports will be determined through the review and circulation of the applicant's current proposal; 6.3 Owner / Applicant Information - the owners of the subject lands are Ontario Realty Corporation; - the applications have been submitted by Bryce Jordan of Sernas Associates on behalf of Ontario Realty Corporation; - the Ontario Realty Corporation representative for these applications is Graham Martin. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Ross Pym MCIP, RPP Lynda Taylor, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner - Development Review Manager, Development Review RP:cs Attachments Copy: Director, Planning & Development ATTACHMENT # TO 5 6 REPORT # PD APPENDIX NO. I TO INFORMATION REPORT NO. 01-09 COMMENTING RESIDENTS AND LANDOWNERS (1) none received to date COMMENTING AGENCIES (1) Durham District School Board (2) Enbridge Gas Distribution (3) Canada Post (4) Hydro One Networks (5) Durham Catholic District School Board (6) Veridian Connections (7) Bell (8) Conseil scolaire de district du Centre-Sud-Ouest COMMENTING CITY DEPARTMENTS (1) none received to date ATTACHMENT # ~d TO REPORI # Po Excerpts from City Planning & Development 5 7 Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, February 2, 2009 7:30 pm - Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Johnson (1) PART `A' - PLANNING INFORMATION MEETING 1. Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-10 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 20/08 Ontario Realty Corporation Part. Lot 17 and 18, Concession 3 City of Pickering A public information meeting was held under the Planning Act, for the purpose of informing the public with respect to the above noted application. Lynda Taylor, Manager, Development Review gave an outline of the requirements for a Statutory Meeting under the Planning Act. She also noted that if a person or public body does not make oral or written submissions to.the City before the by-law is passed, that person or public body are not entitled to appeal the decision of City Council to the Ontario Municipal Board, and may not be entitled to be added as a party to the hearing unless, in the opinion of the Board, there are reasonable grounds to do so. Ross Pym, Principal Planner, Development Review, gave an overview of zoning amendment application A 20/08. Bryce Jordan of Sernas Associates appeared before the Committee in support of zoning amendment application A 20/08. No members of the public in attendance at the public information meeting spoke in support or opposition to zoning amendment application A 20/08. 1 ATTACHMENT # TO REPORT # PD 01--W 58 RECEIVED Sept.15/08 SEP i 6 2008 CITY OF PI CKERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Mr. Ross Pym DEPARTMENT Principal Planner Development Review City of Pickering Dear Sir: We received notification of a public meeting to be held Monday, Sept.29?08 at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers to discuss the Draft Plan of Subdivision SP - 2008 -01, and the Draft Plan of Subdivision SP - 2008.- 08, submitted by Mattamy ( Brock Road) Limited and Lebovic Enterprises Limited respectively.. Unfortunately due. to prior commitments, we will not be able to attend the meeting that evening. However we fully endorse developments & upgrades to this long neglected area which we call the gateway to the City of Pickering. Since we own Kahn Auctions Ltd., 2699 Brock Road North and we are located between these 2 proposed subdivisions we have some concerns regarding our water supply. As you may know or not know, our auction barn is totally serviced by our well & septic systems, which has served us well for many years without fail. Therefore our main. concern is the impact it will have on our water levels to service. our auction barn once construction & grading begins for,these subdivisions. In closing we would like to know what assurances will be in place so as our water supply to our auction barn will` not be impaired Yours truly, '7*7 c/o Kahn Auctions Ltd. 1130 Regional Road #21, Port Perry, Ont., L9L 1115 905- 985-8161 hkahn@sympatico.ca i I ATTACHMENT # 12- TO REPORT # PD 59 December 9, 2009 Ross Pym, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. ! Planning & Development Department ' City of Pickering One The Esplanade Pickering, ON L1V 6K7 The Regional Municipality Mr. Pym: of Durham Planning Department Re: Regional Comments for Duffin Heights Plan of Subdivision 605 ROSSLAND ROAD E Applications S-P-2008-08 and S-P-2008-10 (Lebovic and ORC) 4T" FLOOR P.O. BOX 623 WHITBY, ON L1N 6A3 Further to our comments of December 5, 2008, for the Duffin (905) 668-7711 preliminary Fax: (905) 666-6208 Heights plan of subdivision applications, we have received a revised plan E-mail: planning@ which merges the previous plan S-P-2008-08 (formerly Lebovic) with region.aurnam.on.ca adjacent lands to the south and plan of subdivision application S-P-2008- www.region.durham.on.ca 10 (formally ORC). The new plan (Lebovic-Bradshaw), dated June 2009, A.L. Georgieff, MCIP, RPP consists of 28 lots for single detached units, twelve lots for 24 semi- Commissioner of Planning detached units, twenty blocks for 106 townhouse units, two open space blocks, roadways and lanes. Our previous comments on plan of subdivision S-P-2008-08 remain applicable. The following additional comments consider the merged plan of subdivision applications with respect to the Regional Official Plan, delegated review responsibilities, water supply and sanitary sewer services. Regional Official Plan The plan of subdivision applications are within the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood in the City of Pickering on lands primarily designated "Living Area"; lands adjacent to Brock Road are designated "Regional Corridor"; and Brock Road is designated as a Type "A" arterial road and a "Transit Spine" in the Regional Official Plan. "Living Areas" are to be used predominantly for housing purposes. "Regional Corridors" are to be developed as mixed-use areas, which include residential, commercial and service areas with higher densities, supporting higher-order transit services and featuring a high degree of pedestrian oriented design. Development adjacent to Type "A" arterial roads and "Transit Spines" should be high density with buildings oriented toward the street to reduce walking distances to transit facilities. The proposed plan consists of single, semi-detached and townhouse units which would be permitted in "Living Areas". The proposed "Service Excellence for our Communities" ATTACHMENT # L 2 TO 6 O REPORT # PD I`~D townhouse units adjacent to lands designated "Regional Corridor' should be compatible with mixed-use development on Brock Road. Delegated Review Responsibilities The revised plan has been screened in accordance with the terms of the provincial plan review responsibilities. Environmental Protection A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was prepared for the lands in the initial plan S-P-2008-08. The ESA indicates that fill material is present on-site and recommends that a Phase II ESA be undertaken. An ESA is required for the lands in the merged plan (S-P-2008-1 0). A Phase 11 ESA and a Record of Site Condition submitted to the MOE will be required. Archeological As was indicted in our previous comments, the subject lands are within the vicinity of Ganatsekiagon Creek and Urfe Creek in Duffin Heights and have archeological potential.. An archeological report, prepared by D.J. Poulton and Associates, was submitted as part of an ESP and Class EA for Duffin Heights. The report identifies a number of archaeological sites within Duffin Heights, some of which have been determined to be archaeological resources of significance. Among other things, the report recommend's that additional studies to assess and mitigate impacts to archaeological resources be undertaken through development of the subject lands. Given the proximity to Ganatsekiagon Creek and Urfe Creek and the previous archaeological works in the area, detailed archaeological studies are required and should be submitted to MCL for review. Natural Heritage As the subject lands are within the vicinity of creek tributaries and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) regulation limit, comments from TRCA should be obtained to protect the watercourse and surrounding natural environment from adverse impacts of development. Noise The subject lands are within the vicinity of Brock Road, a Type "A" Arterial Road in the Regional Official Plan, and a CP railway line. A noise and vibration study is required to identify adverse impacts from vehicular and ATTACHMENT # TO REPORT # PQQ/J-n61 rail traffic as well as recommend mitigation measures and/or warning clauses. The study should be submitted to this department and CP Railway for review. Water Supply Service The subject lands are within the planned Zone 2 pressure district and water supply is dependent on the following works: i. Construction of a 1200 mm diameter Zone 1 feedermain on Brock Road, Dersan Street and Tillings Road from Rossland Road to a Zone 1 reservoir site in Seaton.. ii. Construction of a Zone 2 booster pumping station on Dersan Street in Duffin Heights. iii. Construction of Zone 2 watermains from the Zone 2 booster pumping station to the subject lands. Upon completion of the necessary water supply works, the static water pressure will be approximately 414 kPa (60 psi). Provision must be made for looping Zone 2 watermains to provide security of supply and circulation with adjacent developments. A 300 mm watermain will be required on proposed Street A. A 400 mm watermain will be required on Brock Road and Old,Taunton Road or alternatively through the proposed lands. Water supply for Blocks 49 and 50 shall be provided from a watermain installed on easement in the adjacent village green. Sanitary Sewerage Sanitary sewer service is dependent on the extension of the Central Duffin collector trunk sanitary sewer on Valley Farm Road and construction of a sanitary sewer pumping station and forcemain. The east/west segment of proposed Lane D should be a minimum width of 8.5 metres. Only sanitary sewer will be permitted within"this segment of the lane. The north/south segment of proposed Lane D is not of sufficient width to accommodate both the proposed watermain and sanitary sewer. A minimum lane width of 9.0 metres is required for two mains as per Regional easement requirements. ATTACHMENT # TO REPORT # PD Summary Based on the above comments, there are a number of reports and studies required as well as outstanding lane width issues. The Regional Works Department hag been working with the developer to finalize the service locations. A revised plan is expected. Conditions of draft approval will be provided following circulation of a. revised plan and the required reports for review. Please contact me should you have any questions or require additional information regarding this matter. OGDwayne Mam ~ ibell, M.C.I. , R.P.P. Project Planner Current Planning cc: Regional Works Department - Peter Castellan I ATTACHMENT # TO TORONTO AND REGION REPORT # PD O I -lO )Conservation RECEIVED 63 for The Living City DEC 0 7 2009 December, 1, 2009 CITY OF PICKERING CFN 41302 PLANNDEPARTMEN DEVELOPMENT XREF CFN 38029 . BY E-MAIL AND MAIL Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Development Review Planning & Development Department City of Pickering One The Esplanade Pickering, ON L1V 6K7 Dear Mr. Pym: Re: Zoning Bylaw Amendment A 16/08 Draft Plan of Subdivision S-P-2008-08 Duffin Heights Community, City of Pickering Lebovic Enterprises Limited (former Bradshaw Property) Thank you for the opportunity to review the following documents submitted in support of the proposed Zoning Bylaw Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision applications: • Drawing No. DP-2, Draft Plan of Subdivision, prepared by Sernas Associates, revised June 2009, received July 14, 2009; • FSSR, prepared by Sernas Associates, dated July, 2009, received July 13, 2009. Our comments follow from our various letters related to our review of the Duffin Heights ESP, which is not at this time fully satisfactory to TRCA. Our Understanding of the Application We understand that the proposal has been revised to accommodate 28 lots of single family residential,, 12 lots of semi-detached residential, 40 lots medium density residential, a mixed corridor composed of 106 townhouse units, and an open space block. The,subject, property is located within the Duffin Heights neighbourhood and is subject to Official Plan Amendment 18 (recently approved by the Ontario Municipal Board), the Duffin Heights Neighborhood Urban Design Guidelines and the Duffin Heights ESP to be revised per the on-going discussions with Sernas Associates and the City of Pickering's Engineering staff. A site walk has been scheduled for December 8, 2009 for TRCA to stake the limit of the natural feature. Further to the ESP, a minimum 10 metre buffer is required from the edge of the natural feature. The 10 metre buffer and staked natural feature should form the limits of the open space block and should be exclusive of lots or other development, re-designated to an open space zoning category and gratuitously conveyed to the TRCA. Monitoring The ESP requires that the Duffin Heights Landowner Group provide initial seed funding of $100,000 to the TRCA to implement the watershed system monitoring and management program, and $40,000 to the City of Pickering to implement invasive species management, prior to the draft approval of the first development application. The monitoring program was initiated in 2008. TRCA staff acceptance of the GAHome\Public\Development Services\Durham Region\PickeringUebovic bradshaw duffin heights_Ldoc Member of Conservation Ontario 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, Ontario M3N 1S4 (416) 661-6600 FAX 661-6898 www.trca.on.ca ATTACHMENT # ~3 To REPORT # PD 41-'10 Ross Porn -Page 2 of 4_- December 1, 2009 U -T approval of proposed Zoning Bylaw Amendment and Conditions of Draft Plan of Subdivision are contingent upon the receipt of this agreed-upon funding for the monitoring program. Preliminary Review of FSSR We will not review the details of the FSSR until such time as the ESP is finalized and a revised FSSR consistent with same is submitted. However, we have identified some concerns with the submitted FSSR, including those related to: 1) partitioning infiltration into interflow and deep recharge; 2) the location of water balance mitigation measures on private lands rather than the recommended public lands; and 3) the on-going debate regarding pre-development modeling. Conditions of Draft Plan of Subdivision Approval While we would prefer that the approvals be delayed until the ESP is finalized, if the City of Pickering is prepared to issue Conditions of Draft Plan of Subdivision approval, then we offer the following conditions and will provide our technical comments on a resubmitted FSSR after the revised ESP is satisfactory to all parties. 1. Prior to the initiation of grading, and prior to the registration of this Draft Plan of Subdivision or any phase thereof, the owner shall submit the following to The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the City of Pickering for review and approval: a. A revised FSSR consistent with the Duffin Heights ESP as approved by TRCA and City of Pickering; b. The FSSR shall include a detailed design for the storm drainage system for the proposed development including: i. plans illustrating how this drainage system will tie into surrounding drainage systems and stormwater management techniques which may be required to control minor or major flows; ii. appropriate stormwater management practices to be used to treat stormwater, to mitigate the impacts of development on the quality and quantity of ground and surface water resources as it relates to terrestrial and aquatic habitat; iii. detailed design and maintenance plans for any stormwater management facilities; iv. an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, consistent with the Erosion and Sediment Control Guideline for Urban Construction (Greater Golden Horseshoe Area Conservation Authorities, 2007), as amended; V. location and description of all outlets and other facilities which may require a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended; vi. plans illustrating how the design of SWM facility considers wildlife passages and innovative design features such as wetland forebays and outlets. C. Overall grading plans for the lands within the Draft Plan of Subdivision illustrating, among others, how all vegetation in the natural heritage system will be protected from grading and construction impacts. GAHome\Public\Development Services\Durham Region\Pickering\lebovic bradshaw duff in heights_l.doc ATTACHMENT # l3 TO REPORT # PD Ross Pym - Page3 of 4 - December 1, 2009 d. An Edge Management Plan to the satisfaction of the City, in consultation with the 65 TRCA. e. A Compensation Report that demonstrates how compensation for areas identified in the Duffin Heights ESP has been addressed to the satisfaction of the City, in consultation with the TRCA. 2. The owner shall obtain all necessary permits required pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, prior to registration. 3. The owner shall enter into an agreement with the City of Pickering committing to undertake the Monitoring Program as required in the Duffin Heights ESP. 4. The owner shall provide a letter of credit to the City of Pickering for the full cost of the implementation of the plans identified in Condition No. 3. 5. The owner shall engage TRCA to stake the limit of the natural heritage system on site with a licensed Surveyor. The natural heritage system shall include a staked natural feature and a 10 metre buffer and shall be identified on a legal survey. 6. The owner shall install fences along the boundary of the development blocks and the publicly owned natural heritage system. 7. A restrictive covenant shall be placed over the rear yards of all lots created adjacent to the publicly owned natural heritage system. The restrictive covenant shall have the effect of prohibiting: 1) the removal of fences along the lot line of all subject development lots; and 2) the installation of gates or other access through the fences along the lot line of all development lots. 8. That the owner agrees in the subdivision agreement, in wording acceptable to the TRCA: a. To carry out, or cause to be carried out, to the satisfaction of. the TRCA, the recommendations of the technical reports referenced in Condition No. 1; b. To agree to, and implement, the requirements of the TRCA's conditions in wording acceptable to the TRCA; C. To design and implement on site erosion and sediment control; d. To maintain all stormwater management and erosion and. sedimentation control structures operating and in good repair during the construction period, in a manner satisfactory to the TRCA; e. To obtain all necessary permits pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, from the TRCA; f. To erect a permanent fence, to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering and TRCA, along the boundary of the development blocks and the publicly owned natural heritage. system; g. To implement all water balance/infiltration measures identified in the approved FSSR; h. To commit to provide appropriate information to all perspective buyers of lots adjacent to. the publicly owned natural heritage system through all agreements for purchase and sale, sales information, and community maps to ensure that the land owners are well GAHome\Public\Development Services\Durham Region\Pickering\lebovic bradshaw duffin heights_l.doc ATTACHPENT # IS TO REPORT # PD O LZ Ross P m - Page 4 of 4- December 1 2009 0 (D informed that private use and/or access to the open space blocks shall not be permitted, and reflect the intent of the following: "The open space adjacent to the subject property is considered to be part of the publicly owned natural heritage system and will be maintained for environmental protection, and public use purposes. Please note that uses such as private picnics, barbeque or garden areas; and/or the dumping of refuse (e.g. grass/garden clippings, household compostable goods, garbage etc.) are not permitted on these lands. In addition, access to the valley corridor such as private rear yard gates and/or ladders are prohibited." i. To convey the Open Space Block(s) associated with the valley to Toronto and Region Conservation. for the nominal sum of $2 prior to the registration of the Subdivision. 9. The owner shall provide a total of $1,513 per ha [as determined by City of Pickering] contribution to the Fish Habitat Restoration Fund administered by the City for restoring fish habitats as identified in the ESP in consultation with the TRCA. 10. That the Draft Plan of Subdivision be red-line revised in order to meet the requirements of the TRCA's conditions, if necessary. The owner will be required to provide a TRCA clearance fee prior to TRCA clearing any of the Draft Plan conditions. The current clearance fee effective January 4, 2008 is $7,600 and is subject to change. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or if clarifications are required. Sincerely, Steven H. Heuchert, MCIP, RPP, MRTPI Manager, Development Planning and Regulation Planning and Development Extension 5311 cc: Reg Webster, Sernas (via e-mail) Andrea Keeping, Sernas (via e-mail) - Lynda Taylor, City of Pickering (via e-mail) Grant.McGregor, City of Pickering (via e-mail) Bob Starr, City of Pickering (via e-mail) Marilee Gadzovski, City of Pickering (via e-mail) Scott Jarvie, TRCA GAHome\Public\Development Services\Durham Region\PickeringUebovic bradshaw duffin heights_Ldoc ATTACHNIFIT #_J TO REPORI # PD Dl-ID Ronald Marion 67 Conseil scolaire de district Pr6sid President du Centre-Sud-Ouest Jean-Luc Bernard Directeur de 1'education et secretaire-tresorier December 9, 2008 Mr. Ross Pym MCIP RPP Principal Planner - Development Review Planning and Development Department City of Pickering Pickering Civic Complex One The Esplanade Pickering, Ontario L1V 6K7 Subject: City of Pickering Draft Plan of Subdivision S-P-2008-08 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 16/08- Lebovic Enterprises Limited Part Lot 18, Concession 3 City of Pickering Thank you for circulating a copy of the revised draft plan of subdivision to this office for review. As you may be aware, le Conseil scolaire de district du Centre-Sud-Ouest requires two school sites in this area for the catchment area of Durham Region. Please note that the school board is confirming the need for an elementary school site of 4.0 acres and/or a secondary school site of 7.0 acres and/or a combined elementary/secondary site of approximately 10 acres to be located within Draft Plan of Subdivision S-P-2008-01. The Board intends to continue to work with the City and the developer to ascertain the most appropriate school site. Since an agreement on the location of the school site has not yet been reached, the Board would like to include the following condition in this Plan of Subdivision until such time that the school site has been finalized. "Prior to final approval, le Conseil scolaire de district du Centre-Sud-Quest and the Owner shall come to agreement on a location for a new elementary and/or secondary school to the satisfaction of the Board." I trust the above comments are satisfactory at this time. We wish to confirm our continued interest and involvement in working with the City of Pickering on finding a suitable location for our future elementary and secondary school sites. If you have any questions or comments please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, 110 ~~rx Suzanne Labrecque ` C.C. Jean-Luc Bern rd, Director of Education Catherine Gravely, Sorensen Gravely Lowes Planning Associates Inc. Siege social - 116, Cornelius Parkway, Toronto (Ontario) M6L 2K5 Tei.: 416 614-0844 Secteur des affaires 1, promenade Vanier, Welland (Ontario) L3B 1A1 Tel.: 905 732-4280 www.csdcso.on.ca I ATTACHMENT # 1S TO O~eG D15 rR/CTs REPORT # PD 6 LIL o~ °ya Durham Catholic District School Board Q W ~0 0 November 25, 2009 RECEIVED Nov 2 7 2009 Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner - Development Review CITY OF PICKERING Planning & Development Department ~NNDEPARTMENTPMENT City of Pickering One The Esplanade Pickering, Ontario. L1 V 6K7 RE: REVISED DRAFT PLAN SUBMISSION DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION SP-2008-08 ZONING BY-LAw AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 16/08 LEBOVIC ENTERPRISES LIMITED PART OF LOT 18, CONCESSION 3 CITY OF PICKERING Upon further review of the above noted Revised Draft Plan of Subdivision, planning staff at the Durham Catholic District School Board are requesting amendments to be made to the plan to increase the abutting Catholic school site's frontage and total acreage. Currently, the proposed Catholic school site is 1.739ha or 4.30ac. This site size falls well below the Board's standard of a minimal 5.Oac. school site. The Durham Catholic District School Board requests revisions to provide for a school site of approximately 6.Oac.to adequately and safely accommodate an elementary school that would benefit the community and all of the children who would attend said school. The Board requests that the current street layout, specifically "STREET B", remain as is, and that the three townhouse blocks, 58, 59 and 60, comprising of 14 lots be removed and that this portion • of land be added to the existing Catholic school site. This amendment to the revised plan of subdivision SP-2008-08 would increase the site's frontage by allowing the west and north sides of the site to have access to the proposed street network. It would also increase the school site's overall total acreage to a size that would provide for an efficient and effective school design and traffic flow. Please notify me if you have any questions or concerns. • Sincerely your , Gerry O'Neill Manager Planning & Admissions Durham Catholic District School Board Tel: (905) 576-6707 1-877-482-0722 ext. 2207 :jd 650 Rossland Road West, Oshawa, Ontario LiJ 7C4 Tel 905 576-6150 Toll :Free 1 877 482-0722 www.dcdsb.ca Paul Pulla B. Sc., a Ed., MSc. Ed. Director of Education / Secretary / Treasurer pickann Ctvlc Complex Q~W c~ ATTACHMENT #~TD Ono The Eeplinede I REPORT # PD Pldtering,onteria Conaaa L1V 81(7 _ I Direct Access 905,430,4660 VICKERING Toll Free 1.BB6.683.2760 69 cityorpirxering.com " PL~►NNING $ DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Department 905,420,4617 Fa 1 &dlle 905A I plar ~ $devl®dty,plcXerIn kerlnp, on.ce V PE D July 10, 2009 JUL 2 9 2009 Subject: Revised Draft Plan Submission Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-OS CITY OF PICKERING Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 16/08 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Lebovic Enterprises Limited DEPARTMENT Part Lot 18 Concession 3 City of.Pickering Attached please find copy(ies) of a draft plan of subdivision regarding the subject application. Return o~ your comments/conditions within four (4) weeks of the above date would be appreciated. If you have any questions, please contact Ross Pym at extension 2034,' Second submission of proposed draft Plan of subdivision. Attached is a copy of the second submission of the draft plan of subdivision. 'The revision of the application relates to the addition of land to the south that are subject to application SP-2008-10 and A20/08, The applicant has requested to consolidate the two parcels and the related applications. Please review the revise plan and provide any additional comments or confirm your original comments on the applications if they are not impacted be the revised submission, Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Prlincipal Planner -Development Review A i achment(s) COMMENTS/CONDITIONS: I We have no objections, I $i ined; 1 JD Date: T~ 3 0 0 CIRCULATION LIST: O Mayor & Councillors rd Veridian Corporation O Chief Administrative Officer 0 Bell.Cariada 17 City Solicitor 0 Rogers Cable 0 City Clerk I Enbridge Gas C3 Fire Chief ❑ TRCA C3 Director, Corporate Services and Treasurer C3 CLOCA 13 Director, Planning and Development 0 Hydro One Networks Inc, ❑ Director, Operations and Emergency Services 0 Ontario Power Generation' ❑ Division Head, Culture and Recreation .0 Ministry of Transportation ❑ Division Head, Municipal Property and Engineering ❑ GO Transit ❑ Supervisor, Development Control 0 CNR ❑ Manager of Transportation 0 CPR ❑ Heritage Pickering O Pickering Post Office - Superintendent ❑ Ratepayer / Community Association 0 Canada Post . 0 Ajax-Pickering Board of Trade 0 Enbridge Pipeline ❑ Social Development council of Ajax-Pickering 0 Trans Northern Pipeline ' ❑ Ministry of Municipal Affairs $ Housing .0 TrarisCanada Pipeline ❑ _ Durharn Region: Planning Dept. 0 Durham District School Board 0 Durham Region: Works Dept, 0 Durhem Catholic District School Board ❑ Durham Region: Health Unit 0 Le Scolaire pubile de district Centre-Sud-Ouest. 0 Durham Region Police: 19th Division 0 Conseil Scolaire de District Catholique Centre-Sud 0 Abutting Municipality -Ajax ❑ GTAA • i ' I ATTACHMENT #-12--TO REPORT # PD_ Q Zo RICT SC y 7 E- ED 00 August 6, 2009 , i ~~G 1 2009 The City of Pickering CITY OF p1CKEFt11~1GENT O Planning Dept., Pickering Civic Centre Pt~NN~DEPART, ENTPM `qud uevWdacaciam `dad-c - One The Esplanade Pickering, ON Ll V 6K7 Facilities Services 400 Taunton Road East Attention: Mr. Ross Pym Whitby, Ontario. L 1 R 2K6 Dear Mr. Pym; Telephone: (905) 666-5500 1-800-265-3968 Fax: (905) 666-6439 nom: Devised Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 (Consolidated with SP-2008-10) Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 16/08 Lebovic Enterprises Limited Part of Lot 18 Concession 3 City of Pickering Staff has reviewed the information on the above noted revised application and has the following comments.... 1. Approximately 79 elementary pupils and 31 secondary pupils could be generated by the above noted revised application. 2. It is intended that any pupils generated by the above noted plan be accommodated within existing school facilities. 3. Under the mandate of the Durham District School Board, staff has no objections. Yours truly, Christine Naneekivell Senior Planner I.IPROPLAMDATAIPLNGISUB1SP1008-08 Revision LDOC ATTACHMENT #TO REPORT # PD_ 61-lb ROG ERS_ CABLE WON July 15, 2009 Mr. Ross Pym RECEIVED Planning & Development Department JUL City of Pickering, . Ontario CITY CP pICKE1+3ING DEVEL PANNING D ME OPMENT Dear Mr. Pym: Re: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Rogers Cable Communications Inc. ("Rogers") has reviewed the application for the above Site Plan and has determined that it intends to provide cable and telecommunications services. Accordingly, we request that municipal approval be granted subject to the following conditions: (1) Prior to Site Plan approval, the Developer/Owner will, at its own cost, grant all necessary easements and maintenance agreements required by those CRTC-licensed telephone companies and broadcasting distribution companies intending to serve the Site Plan (collectively, the "Communications Service Providers"). Immediately following registration of the Site Plan , the Developer/Owner will cause these documents to be registered on title. (2) Prior to Site Plan approval, the Developer/Owne.r will, with consultation with the applicable utilities and Communications Service Providers, . prepare an overall utility distribution plan that shows the locations of all utility infrastructure for the Site Plan, as well as the timing and phasing of installation. In addition, we kindly request to, where possible, receive copies of the following documents: (1) the comments received from any of the Communications Service Providers during circulation; (2) the proposed conditions of draft approval as prepared by municipal planners prior to their consideration by Council or any of its committees; and (3) the planners' report recommending draft approval before it goes to Council or any of its committees. ATTACHMENT #_-~B-TO 72 REPORT # PD--O-/-/Q Page 2 Should you require further information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-436-4136. Sincerely, Bernie Visser System Planner copy: OPE Manager SEP-17-08 09:15 FROM- T-065 P-002/003 F-158 ATTACHMENT # TO REPORT # PD /ID 73 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Lesser B, Pearson International Airport . , P.O. Box 6031, 3111 Convairbrive Toronto AMF, Ontario, Canada L5P 1B2 GTAA Airport Planning Olga Smid Managcr, Land Use Planning Tcl: (416) 776-7355 Fax: (416) 776-4168 (Transmitted via Facsimile 905-420-7645) September 15, 2008 Mr. Ross Pym Principal Planner - Development Review City of Pickering - Planning & Development Depar meat Pickering Civic Complex One The Esplanade Pickering, Ontario,L1V 6K7 Dear Mr. 111ytn: RE: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Zoning Sy-law Amendment Application A 16/08 Lebovic Enterprises Limited Part Lot 18, Concession 3 , City of Pickering Thank you for providing the Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA) with a copy of the above-noted applications. We have reviewed the proposal to develop 28 single family dwellings, 24 seini-detached dwellings, and 83 townhouses on the subject property in an area that is designated as. "Regional Node 1" and "Natural Area" in the Pickering Official Plan, and offer the following continents: The GTAA released its Draft Plan for the Pickering Airport La11ds in November 2004. The Draft Plan proposed that the prohibition of sensitive land uses be defined by the 25 NEF contour for the GTAA's proposed runway configuration. This is consistent with Transport Canada's recent revision to its guideline for "Land Use in the Vicinity of Airports" (Publication TP 1247E) to recognize the 25 NEF as the new standard for non-urban airports. The subject property is located outside of the 25 NSF Noise contour for the proposed airport. l SEP-17-08 09:16 FROM- T-065 P. 00.3/003 F-158 ATTACHMENT TO REPORI # PD ©L/D 74 Mr. Ross Pym G T A A September 15, 2008 Page 2 If the airport proceeds, further refinements to the runway config«ration recommended. in the Draft Plan may be necessary as new environmental and operational/engineering information becomes available, either through the environmental assessment process or during design of the facilities. Such refinements could potentially alter the location of the 25 NL-F contour. However, it is our position ihat the location of the property owned by Lebovic Enterpiises Limited and located on Part of Lot 18, Concession 3 in the City of Pickering, would not be iunpacted by potential refinements to the proposed runway layout. The GTAA therefore has no objection to the future proposed development of 135 residential uniCs on the site. If you have any questions, please feel flee to contact Kathryn Tracey-Leitcb, Senior Land Use Planner, at 416-776-4012. YOLLTS very truly, GREATER TORONTO A] RPORTS AUTHORITY Olga Si id Manager, Land tfse Planning 0/1512008 2:30 PM OS/K71.11and Usa&ning ATTACHMIENT # 2-0 _TO REPORT # PD d%~ 75 Pickering Civic Complex CI&I o0 RECEIVED One The Esplanade 1$ Pickering, Ontario Canada L1V 6K7 2 ~9 Direct Access 905.420.4660 U 2 Toll Free 1.866.683.2760 J cityofpickering.com PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF DICKERING Department 905.420.4617 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Facsimile 905.420.7648 DEPARTMENT plan&devi@city. pickehng.on.ca July 10, 2009 Subject: Revised Draft Plan Submission Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 16108 Lebovic Enterprises, Limited Part Lot-18 Concession 3 City of Pickering Attached please find copy(ies) Qf a draft plan of subdivision regarding the subject application. Return of your comments/conditions within four (4) weeks of the above date would be appreciated. If you have any questions, please contact Ross Pym at extension 2034. Second submission of proposed draft planof subdivision. Attached is a copy of the second submission of the draft plan of subdivision. The revision of the application relates to the addition of land to the south. that are, subject to application SP-2008-10 and A20/08. The applicant has requested to consolidate the two parcels and the related applications. Please review the revise plan and provide any additional comments or confirm your original comments on the applications if they are not impacted be the revised submission. Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner- Development Review Attachment(s) Date. T 2 ca thrs We have r4rewed the application concerning subdivislonkondominium proposal. Hydro one has NO OBJECTION in principle to the proposed plan as presently laid out. Please be COMMENTS/CONDITIONS: advised that no further coirespondence.is required concerning this ❑ We have no objections. subdivision/condominium. en r eal Estate Coordinator Signed: Date: CIRCULATION LIST; ❑ Mayor & Councillors 0 Veridian Corporation Gi ❑ Chief Administrative Officer 0 Bell Canada Laura r0ura iut~# ❑ City Solicitor .0 Rogers Cable One ❑ City Clerk 0. Enbridge Gas ❑ Fire Chief ❑ TRCA ❑ Director, Corporate Services and Treasurer ❑ CLOCA ❑ Director, Planning and Development El Hydro-One Networks Inc. ❑ Director, Operations and Emergency Services ❑ Ontario Power Generation ❑ Division Head, Culture and Recreation Ministry of Transportation. ❑ Division Head, Municipal Property and Engineering ❑ GO Transit ❑ Supervisor, Development Control 0 CNR ❑ Manager of Transportation, 0 CPR ❑ Heritage Pickering ❑ Pickering Post Office - Superintendent ❑ Ratepayer / Community Association 0 Canada Post ❑ Ajax-Pickering Board of Trade 0 Enbridge Pipeline ❑ Social Development councli of Ajax-Pickering 0 Trans Northern Pipeline ❑ _ Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing 0 TransCanada Pipeline ❑ Durham Region: Planning Dept. H Durham District School Board ❑ Durham Region: Works Dept. 0 Durham Catholic District School Board ❑ Durham Region: Health Unit 0 Le Scolaire public de district Centre-Sud-Ouest ❑ Durham Region Police: 19'" Division 0 Conseil Scolaire de District Cathoiique Centre-Sud P1 Ahrrtfinn Munirinality -Aiar 171 f:TAA ATTACHMENT #_____t----TO REPORT # PD -Ll 0 76 C;oENBRIDGE ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. 500 Consumers Road North York ON M2J 1P8 AUGUST 21sT, 2009 Mailing Address P.O. Box 650 Scarborough ON M1K 5E3 RCS Fy~ ROSS PYM, MCIP,RPP PRINCIPAL PLANNER - 5 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF PCKERING CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PICKERING CIVIC COMPLEX ONE THE ESPLANADE PICKERING ON L1V 6K7 Dear Sirs: RE: REVISED DRAFT PLAN-SUBMISSION DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION SP-2008-08 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT•APPLICATION A"16/08 LEBOVIC ENTERPRISES LIMITED PART LOT 18 CONCESSION 3 CITY OF PICKERING Enbridge Gas Distribution requests that the following conditions be included in the subdivision agreement: 1. The developer is responsible for preparing a composite utility plan that allows for the safe installation of all utilities, including required separation between utilities. 2. Streets are to be constructed in accordance with composite utility plans previously submitted and approved by all utilities. 3. The developer shall grade all streets to final elevation prior to the installation of the gas lines and provide Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. with the necessary field survey information for the installation of the gas lines. 4. It is understood that the natural gas distribution system will be installed within the proposed road allowance. In the event that this is not possible, easements will be provided at no cost to Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. ATTACHMENT #-L TO REPORT # PD_{' 77 Enbridge also requests that the owner / developer contact our Regional Sales Development department at their earliest convenience to discuss installation and clearance requirements for main, service and metering facilities. Yours truly, Tony Ciccone Manager, Network Analysis Distribution' Planning (416) 758-7966 (416) 758-4374 - FAX TC: ATTACHMENT # 2-2 TO REPORT # PD 7B. C I N T ~I.~ UCA'nON REVIEW ~ Cm 1, L R1 T APP o C a .V n E CI 1 u n s DEV~I.OPASEN CZ) CID I'RU BCI N U: Irl:ocicT~terptecsL_d.-BradrbI'mPropc--~ 3 r I O ADDRE C,~PI.AI~: PatiTrt 1#•, Comession 3 l o MLtvfCLP~1.IT5`: Pir:•:eri2~, :1> 3 t]N 1?.3TE: Jul I C, 2.1D9 I CID REFNO : Sp --om-o3, _i 16ift SUBM]5 sZ =be Ic•]loer 3 i! mn a xvi_^r~ of the g~~eral re~aicesenu She Ap Aicantis Likely to t'n order t ~ obtain s corn_ilehe w. vol eechir-It ponder snoplj s3.~sieni to this _it•. etid evihin ilre tip ir'netc subdsilion ~ SOME E7® is 1;S V. -i m:f . comcoeat:. C•ekra am Lased oe.prekninay i,6,, atjm only and are subleet to c isian. In all ears e~dirn stsodar3 fo_ the p Con~oas of semi-CE, Jacumeat gets cu:tLe mquLetmeaM unmi and av-diticni r.Jriiau o: electric se-~cc This rcriva• 4Rx6 no: co:)stimx as Ore. to Ccanect. F ] h1-cIr_c eentice ii cuittflT a:•ai~ble on the road -Jr:•arce &mcrly arjocent ti iHs •g S=ic-ma w:L be frcnn MwchRoad acd Veiidia,_'s nppls voltage ? if1 k-•e Ft 7711V 1 9n Expar su-u -sill 1=e required_.-Wri-liaui s eASOSg detri~rrt :jn f tlltim mast be wtnded on the mtad . alc-wi4%;~ in. c--d" Lo th16 prt:foct. Vii in:ts:dtntia' cerAopmrnm al s di espamions are undergrnunE. -r7 X 3. Lndisic uvl ruelu nn for cash uril is required. - Z - o srl e aT?t < c ° cu:re d 4_ 4 lhtg- . ehace cimct'ourierl cnd sncrxe rc2sed docicd k•op uadccgo -x d c o im'' From rbE dear nratej suppl^ point{>) ui Tlrortf 11,aad to transform m to cshons dun thePnt ie_ au at the :ippli-fla cost. j. t1 di_ectionxl bared and;or open co( UGderpetrnd road mixci_ & may be.requic . 11-.C Agpiicmt -ci:l be rcgtrirej to camp'eie d:• s work and corer 0 costa assoelted nib ibis req itremtmt. 6. -%TeA lat'3 a.-dsling di<,to-N tim f alti!!s located mBmckRoaJ atd./m Old 173uawn Ro36 m;y3;a-kc to he reloaxd at t]:cApplicanE_ cult n accomadh.ie the proptried amf ci development 7 The AgplicEn.ir.aKm-;edi:.cctip*a•ionTo':•eric.btaforE•leciricsl--cnjtirgasBoor ;l8possible. A tiritwn,faaed atcmad riustwill ncrw-k c i< Jr.bcginthz toranEcessar, toioent4SPE•=ific icgaicamr-rnif and j=u.ngcmcnts a'ul iela W=Lk fc•1 tai> pr--4and to make sm (7) rfrj to Corsxe The applicant i rmuucmet that tande.n coal-acts. crwack theylydv it atep--jortc• ahc3inine m Ofia io Conr_ect fr..>r VETidia-, t235 cnezte conFscts.•.viih tie. mu--t o= mj deoils of the tkctti=l sen-Ling sot oct in the t=rlG-,tr Connect Ew-.wIsic.!iVeEdi-,A can Learn* R. o, 5erm = , gxzrnmt must be eipned-mitt V21idi3•1 ~n ocdEr to Obtain ser.•:cing for this Site- CD ' N f ATTACHMENT # ~2- TO REPORT # PQ -17 79 9. -~1hc clmtricx i^ctaU fionj:) f: r>m tic Fubbc sad alLmmm c° W t : tx S=6r ectc ntr s„d -A m5 _c=iag Ica , neua must com?17 -t'itb V-:!tAian s icquL---= Lts and spii r1cancna sad LWT alSC be sus je•_t 11D c- r the req:.sie umfs Jf 'he Elccttkal SaLt. An-h ri i • N 1-1 •11C-APPGc:n-vUbe r°quitcd to grans to j7eti•313n a r=eurdoccttpetinr. ex=emu zcotend U-1 title, fV ffl= Mt-cigCW. - o 0 i. 3 U. lioe to oLit+i•ti_sS a L0log permt, the M n kip- ..v ser=cq ire for Ay Icatit to pr: w'r.Lr e7iderce of CO hasicg obt~ini and site' ed sa Offs to Ceanect. O 1i. WE= cran5s ur,n•strc=al haadLug cguipmtnt r►r :vot-mers mC-~t wotlt is pn:xicuit j ? o eapkg ovezhea_l O -RiWE, where there L risk of coctoci cz DC-M=g wiGii-5 il,e limits oFagFrosen, tl.e aPl-licsvt zba1L pa; :l op _CEts fi7 the tcmpc~-sy=clccaticn, or-at nr obec~.xctica oFilre wires, o_vLatt= otber actimis w dtcmedcessa* b; ti eridiaa to ]p=aside fir sa5ety and the seravY n_ the electual ssstcm. o 15. Lmdtcap'uiv& ip~6ficallt trees, shmbs, o]t= thculd b_ ilct,7jzd%rc7ucatrJ) xm7, 3iom cridixa`e 13 t="sbc=cz, af)d Ea; cltgear-c• avoidiatcrfere-nur u~thstl'rimEn. acce>s ! e CD '-r 14. V : adiaa :AT r-nt attend scmdilcd C ly cf Pkl-c_ uy D--- RT Nlzcfmv fur hit DcvzloF.me3t 15 Vmciditn has no o. g'rtion 0 Ex psoxosed de~ elnl»n-. Please dirc=t fhe Ap_Ic2at *.o comuR Vnidiaa a's,oca at sEmorg is can mplatcA p ilmlicp aliiy, ples; Forwards cap-tsFfir;t n 6vission dvA desihn to l7ezi~- Please note tho m Offer to C:osmcct must lie catnplemd at least six (6) mmth; pricy it ac nru:red ckuda-l se_-viang date: o. C•ihe_: Pr»oe fez tie t!;,Wina =--tomm and pya-srng ncerhmiE La. oc Old Taimtu•s Road Taus- be i S119reEEEd as pits of this decelolx: Wit. . TecbricHllteptes_atati7e: ---edRrti-A-.iGer Teleplacn=: jr 3i5~ x FP/tr_e - 2 O t+'i•~fiiscr~' ~ecrlrav nt_IFpIic:SionPxztir'.P_cl e~ng~.'-DD7'~Leh~it • bn2LLhLv?npcstj -Pi-tLxlF, C:nac_,si iu a.cuc j i i f p 4 w ATTACHMENT # 2-3 TO REPORT # PR 6/ /0 80 Be/ff OCT 1 ® 2008. CITY OF DICKERING Development & Municipal Services Control Centre PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Floor 5, 100 Borough Drive DEPARTMENT Scarborough, Ontario M1P 4W2 Tel: 416-296-6291 Toll-Free: 1-800-748-6284 Fax: 416-296-0520 October 8, 2008 Town of Pickering Planning Department 1 The:Esplande Pickering, Ontario L1V 6K7 Attention: Ross Pym Dear Sir/Madam: RE: Draft Plan of Subdivision Old Taunton Rd. Your File No: SP-2008-08, A 16/08 Bell File No: 43386 Further to our comments of August 22, 2008 Bell Canada is pleased to provide the following additional comments. A detailed review of the Draft Plan of Subdivision has been completed. The following paragraph(s) are to be included as Conditions of Draft Plan of . Subdivision Approval: 1. The Developer is hereby advised that prior to commencing any work within the Plan, the Developer must confirm that sufficient wire-line communication/telecommunication infrastructure is currently available within the proposed development to provide communication/telecommunication service to the proposed development-In the event that such infrastructure is not available, the Developer is hereby advised that the Developer may be required to pay for the connection to and/or extension of the existing communication/telecommunication infrastructure. If the Developer elects not to pay for such connection to and/or extension of the existing communication/telecommunication infrastructure, the Developer shall be required to demonstrate to the municipality that sufficient alternative communication/telecommunication facilities are available within the proposed development to enable, at a minimum, the effective delivery of communication/telecommunication services for emergency management services (i.e., 911 Emergency Services). 2. The Owner shall agree in the Agreement, in words satisfactory to Bell Canada, to grant to Bell Canada any easements that may be required for telecommunication services. Easements may be required subject to final servicing decisions. In the event of any conflict with existing AIL Bell Canada facilities or easements, the owner/developer shall be vancouverzoio responsible for the relocation of such facilities or easements. ~C7Cy' PREMIER NATIONAL PARTNER ATTACHMENT # . 1 TO REPORT # PQ___C_/~/D If there ate any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements, the Owner/Developer shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations.- Should you have any questions please contact Janice M. McConkey at 416-296-6430. Yours truly John La Chapelle, MCIP, RPP Manager - Development & Municipal Services, Ontario i o2~ TO «w"Enbridge Pipelines Inc, ATTACHMENT# 801 Upper Canada Drive REPORT # PD__ P.O. Box 128 Sarnia,' Ontario ~T -•RPn- N7T 7H8 (Courier N7w 1A3) R E C E I V E D 82 FAX: 905-420-7648 AUG 1 8 2008 CITY OF. PICKERING August 18, 2008 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT !rile No. 73.11 Pickering/Durham DEPARTMENT City of Pickering Planning & Development Dept. Pickering civic Complex One The Esplanade Pickering, ON L1 V 6K7 Attention: Mr. Ross Pym Re: Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Part Lot 18, Coin.3, City of Pickering, Region of. Durham Dear Mr. Pym, Enbridge Pipelines Inc. (Enbridge) operates one 762mm diameter pipeline contained in an 18.3m wide right-of-way/easement north, of the railway right-of=way. Enbridge does not have any comments or concerns with regards to the proposed development. Please call if you have any questions. Yours truly; Ann Newman CET Crossings Co-ordinator, Eastern Region Direct Line: 519-339-0503 Office: 519-339-0500 e-mail; ann,newman@enbridge,com Website: www.enbridge,corn Fax: 519-339.0510 Caq v~ ATTACHMENT #~-TQ REPORI # PQ n------- 83 PICKERING MEMO To: Ross Pym November 24, 2009 Principal Planner - Development Review From: Robert'Starr Manager, Development Control Copy: N/A Subject: Revised Draft Plan Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-08 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A16/08 Lebovic Enterprises Limited Part Lot 18, Concession 3 City of Pickering We have reviewed the above noted application and provide the following comments: 1) The noise attenuation. report will be required. 2) Pending a review of the noise attenuation report chain link fencing, as a minimum, will be required as follows: a) Rear of lots 1 to 17 b) South flankage of lot 17 c) East flankage of -block 60 d) Rear of blocks 58.to 60 e) Rear of blocks 46 to 48, pending review of building orientation 3) Building orientation between Block 47 and Block 48 needs to be reviewed. Additional detail must be provided to address encroachment conflicts between Block 48/49. 4) Lane "D" is indicated as a 6.5 m wide lane,. this does not meet the City's minimum standard for a public laneway. This will need to be a private laneway maintained by the residents having access. 5). Street "B" a) Fronting Block 60 - this road pattern is conditional on the applicant providing a detail of the bend in the road. It is greater than 90° and a wider R.O.W and pavement may be required. ATTACHMENT # 25 TO REPORT # PD Q1_10 b) R.O.W may need to be expanded to 16.Om fronting lots 1 to 17 to accommodate the 84 proposed trail system. 6) Street "A" (William Jackson Drive) a) Construction of Street "A" between Old Taunton Road and the north limit of draft plan SP-2008-01 (Mattamy) must be constructed in full and to the satisfaction of the City as a condition of this draft plan. Cost sharing for oversizing will be addressed in the Subdivision Agreement. b) Maintaining access to the Golf Course must be addressed during the construction of Street "A". c) Should Street "A" within draft plan SP-2008-01 not be completed to an acceptable standard or the subdivision- plan not registered, the applicant must provide for an acceptable alternative emergency access to Brock Rd. 7) Old Taunton Road (William Jackson Drive) a) Old Taunton Road-west of Street °A" The following must be addressed with the development of this draft plan: i. future access to existing undeveloped properties on the northside ii. interim use of road and villiage green iii. closing and removal of the connection to Brock Rd. This should be coordinated with the Region of Durham. 8) Old Taunton Road (William Jackson Drive) East of Street "A° a) Servicing restoration and/or reconstruction/urbanization of the portion of this road adjacent to this development must be addressed as a condition of this development. Cost sharing/recovery would be addressed in the Subdivision Agreement. 9) Street "C" - Draft plan should be redesigned to incorporate the Petro-Canada property. Block 55 or a part of it may need to be identified as a future development block until this matter is addressed. 10) Sidewalks Street "A" - Sidewalk - East Side - Multi-use West Side Street "B" Sidewalk - South Side and East Side Street "C - Sidewalk - South Side, West Side, North Side Old Taunton Road (William Jackson Drive) - Pending detailed design. 11) Satisfy the City with regard to the establishment, within this development, of a geodetic benchmark that ties into the existing City of Pickering benchmark system. November 24, 2009 Page 2 Draft Plan of Subdivision SP2008-08 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A16/08 Lebovic Enterprises Limited ATTAGHMENT # 25 TO REPORT # PQ Number and placement to be established during detailed design. 85 12) Storm sewer and stormwater management to be completed in accordance with " approved ESP, functional servicing and stormwater report and detailed engineering plans. 13) Satisfy City with regard to their contribution to the City's Stormwater Management Maintenance Fee 14) Traffic management plan will be required to identify all traffic signage, including street name sign, traffic control signs and applicable warning and information signs/markings. This plan must take into consideration proposed development beyond the limits of this site. 15) A utility coordination plan will be required for this development and must address all utilities, boulevard tree planting, driveway aprons, Canada Post, etc. 16) A construction management plan will be required to address such items as, but not limited to erosion and sediment controls during all phases of construction including inspection and maintenance requirements, controlled access locations, vehicular parking of site workers and trades during all phases of construction , material stockpiles, construction compound, street cleaning, etc. 17) As a condition of Draft approval applicant must enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the City that must address such matters as, but not limited to, cost sharing, completion time limits, maintenance and monitoring, easements, roads, servicing, stormwater management, easements, fencing, lot grading/sodding, boulevard tree planting/landscaping; driveway aprons, traffic management, utilities, securities and insurance. RS:jlm J:tDocumentslDevelopmeul ContmKBOBSTARRMemostepplications\drafl p1anVtosstSP2008-08.doc _ November 24, 2009 Page 3 Draft Plan of Subdivision SP2008-08 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A16/08 Lebovic Enterprises Limited IL I