HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD 04-07
REPORT TO
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
'\ 4: .~
t'. q
Report Number: PO 04-07
Date: February 26, 2007
From:
Neil Carroll
Director, Planning & Development
Subject:
Pickering Official Plan Review
Recommendations:
1. That Report PO 04-07 of the Director, Planning & Development, regarding the
review of the Pickering Official Plan be received;
2. That the Preliminary Work Plan for reviewing the Pickering Official Plan, as set
out in Attachment #3 to Report PO 04-07, be endorsed;
3. That staff be authorized to hold a special mE~eting of Council, as required under
Section 26(3)(b) of the Planning Act, in the spring of 2007 to obtain public input
on revisions to the Pickering Official Plan that may be required;
4. That staff report back on a Final Work Plan that addresses the submissions
received on the Pickering Official Plan; and
5. Further, that a copy of Report PO 04-07 be forwarded to the Region of Durham,
local municipalities in Durham Region, the Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority, the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, the Durham School
Boards for information.
Executive Summary: The Pickering Official Plan has been in effect for almost
10 years. A number of new Provincial documents are now approved and the Durham
Regional Official Plan review is mostly complete. It is important to keep the Official
Plan current with recent Council directions on matters such as sustainability. In
addition, as Official Plans are required to conform to both Provincial policies and
upper-tier plans, staff is requesting that Council endorse the preliminary work plan for
reviewing and updating the Pickering Official Plan.
The Official Plan Review will focus on the following key areas:
· strengthening the sustainable framework to support the City's Sustainable
Neighbourhood Plan and Benchmarking for Sustainability;
· implementing various Provincial policy documents including the Greenbelt Plan,
2005 Provincial Policy Statement and the Central Pickering Development Plan;
· incorporating new Official Plan policies resulting from the Region's review of its
Official Plan;
· preparing new policies to guide intensification consistent with the Growth Plan for
the Greater Golden Horseshoe;
Report PO 04-07
Date: February 26, 2007
Subject: Pickering Official Plan Review
Page 2
.-"4....-..
~-' ~J
· changing the Plan's time horizon from 2016 to 2031; and
· reviewing and updating policies and designations to ensure ongoing
effectiveness.
It is staff's intention to prepare a series of amendments to the City's Official Plan. For
example, the City can initiate Official Plan Amendments for the Greenbelt Plan and the
new Regional Official Plan as those initiatives are now approved. For other
amendments, such as conformity to the Growth Plan, studies are required to be
completed at the local level. It is expected that the Review will require approximately
three years to complete. .
As the Planning Act requires that a special meeting of Council be held to discuss
revisions to the Official Plan, staff is recommending that a special meeting be held in
spring 2007 to obtain public input.
Financial Implications: A budget provision of $40,000 has been recommended for
inclusion in the Planning & Development 2007 Budget for consulting services related to
this initiative.
Sustainability Implications: A review of the Pickering Official Plan at this time
provides the City with an unique opportunity to enhance the sustainable framework in
the Plan by the inclusion of polices to direct sustainable development in accordance
with the City's Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan Guidelines (pending Council's
consideration) and key principles of various Provincial, Regional and Conservation
Authority documents. The result should be a Plan that assists the City in achieving its
sustainable objectives of a healthy environment, society and economy, and responsible
development and consumption.
1.0 Background:
1.1 The Pickering Official Plan was adopted in March 1997 and subsequently
approved by Durham Regional Council in September 1997
Pickering's current Official Plan ('the Plan') was adopted by City Council in March
1997 and approved by Durham RHgional Council in September 1997 with
modifications and deferrals. The Plan's planning horizon is 20 years (up to the
year 2016) and contains detailed pol ides for guiding and managing growth and
development while protecting the natural and rural environments.
Since the Plan's approval, all 14 appeals to the Ontario Municipal Board have
been dealt with, and only 20 out of Ei3 deferrals remain. Most of the deferrals
relate to Seaton and the airport lands, and are listed in Attachment #1.
Report PD 04-07
Date: February 26, 2007
Subject: Pickering Official Plan Review
Page 3
c 4~ addition, the Plan has been amended 12 times either in response to
development applications (e.g. Watson's and Heather Glen golf courses) or to
City initiatives (e.g. Northeast Quadrant Review and Liverpool Road South Area
Detailed Review). The City's Oak Ridges Moraine Conformity Official and
Zoning By-law Amendments are currently awaiting Provincial approval.
1.2 A number of initiatives are either completed or underway by the Province,
Region, City and Conservation Authority that will need to be considered
and incorporated into the Plan's review
At this time, a number of new Provincial policy documents such as the Greenbelt
Plan and the Growth Plan for the Golden Horseshoe have come into force. A
new Provincial Policy Statement is also in effect. At the Regional level,
Amendment 114 to the Durham Regional Official Plan, except for the appeals,
has been approved. This Amendment includes revisions to the environmental,
rural, transportation and commercial components of the Regional Official Plan.
The City has a number of initiatives underway including the Sustainable
Neighbourhood Plan and Benchmarking for Sustainability. Other anticipated
initiatives include preparing a long-term sustainable vision for Downtown
Pickering and undertaking a number of studies required under the Province's
Central Pickering Development Plan such as the Master Environmental Servicing
Plan and Neighbourhood Plans.
A Watershed Plan for the Duffins and Carruthers Creeks and 'Generic
Regulations' that regulate natural features and activities (including development
within regulated areas and any interference or alteration to watercourses, wetlands
and shorelines) have recently come into effect. Other Conservation Authority
initiatives are also underway or commencing.
2.0 Discussion:
2.1 The City's Official Plan has provided a solid foundation for managing
development, guiding infrastructure decisions, and protecting the
environment over the last 10 years
Since 1997, the Plan has provided a solid foundation to guide development and
change i,n the City. The Plan's promotion of Pickering as a complete community
through sustaining healthy ecological, urban, and rural systems remains relevant
especially in light of Council's commitment to sustainability.
While staff is recommending enhancements to the sustainable elements of the
Plan, there is no need at this time to change the fundamental framework,
principles, and goals of the Plan.
In addition to reviewing the Plan to achieve conformity with the new Provincial
and Regional Plans, a general review of the Plan is required to ensure that the
Plan's policies continue to be relevant and appropriate to deal with growth,
development and environmental initiatives.
Report PO 04-07
Date: February 26, 2007
Subject: Pickering Official Plan Review
Page 4
:~.;4~
t ...
To this end, staff has identified several policy areas in the Plan requiring review
such as housing, population and employment targets, planning horizon. There
are also three outstanding Council resolutions that need to be addressed
regarding waste transfer/processingl, archaeological master plan, and the
extension of the Whitevale Heritage Conservation District. Further, a number of
housekeeping/technical changes are required. A list of key initiatives requiring
consideration as part of the Plan's review is provided in Attachment #2.
2.2 A three-year timeframe for completing the Plan's review is realistic
The Plan's review will involve the assessment of various provincial, regional and
conservation policy documents, preparation of selected background studies and
policy papers, and the preparation of a series of Official Plan amendments on a
variety of topics e.g. natural heritage, intensification, and commercial. It is expected
that the review can be completed within the 2007-2009 timeframe as follows:
Year 1 - 2007
Amendments would be prepared implementing the City's sustainable initiatives
such as Benchmarking Sustainability and the Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan.
Also, staff would be implementing the results of several approved initiatives (e.g.
2005 Provincial Policy Statement, Bill 51, Greenbelt Plan, Regional Official Plan
Review and Conservation Authority's 'Generic Regulations'). Other amendments
such as housekeeping matters or updates to the Plan would also be initiated.
Year 2 - 2008
Staff would prepare amendments to implement initiatives completed in 2008.
For example, it is expected that amendments implementing studies completed
under the Province's Central Pickering Development Plan (CPDP) such as the
Natural Heritage System Management Plan and Highway 407 Employment Land
Study would be prepared Other amendments implementing the results of staff's
general review of the Plan's policies and the work related to Council resolutions
would also be prepared for Council's consideration.
Year 3 - 2009
Amendments would be prepared in the third year for the initiatives that are
expected to take longer to complete due to the need for technical studies,
reports and other required docum€!ntation. For example, the Downtown
Intensification Strategy not only requin~s extensive analysis and consultation but
also is partly dependent on background work being done by upper-tier
governments relating to population and employment forecasts. Amendments to
implement the other studies required under the CPDP such as the Master
Environmental Servicing Plan and Neiglhbourhood Plan would be prepared.
Report PD 04-07
Date: February 26, 2007
Subject: Pickering Official Plan Review
Page 5
C 4 In addition, staff is currently participating in several TRCA initiatives. Once each
initiative is completed, appropriate implementation mechanisms will be
determined and amendments to the Plan prepared, if necessary.
A chart listing initiatives, status, anticipated timing of amendments is provided in
Attachment #3.
2.3 Public views and opinions will be solicited during the Plan's Review
As part of the Plan's review, the City will be seeking community input and
engaging stakeholders for their views and opinions during the preparation of the
Official Plan amendments. As a minimum, open houses in addition to statutory
public meetings will be held for the City's amendments.
Public meetings will. be posted on the City's website and in the community page
of the local newspaper. Mailing lists of interested individuals, community groups,
agencies and First Nations will be preparE~d and meeting notices advising of
open houses and public meetings will be mailed. In addition, consultations with
the various public agencies (e.g. region, school boards, conservation authorities)
will be undertaken, as part of the review proc:ess.
2.4 Consultants to assist staff on the technical aspects of the studies
(engineering, architectural and urban design) are required
Significant staff resources throughout the Corporation will be involved in the
Plan's review. As well, consulting services will be required to assist staff on the
technical aspects of selected policy reviews and conformity amendments (such
as engineering, architectural and urban design). In this regard, staff, as part of
the Planning & Development draft 2007 Budget submission, has recommended
a proposed budget of $40,000 for consulting services. Additional funding
requests may be included in the 2008 and 2009 Budget proposal.
2.5 The next step is to hold a special meeting of Council, open to the public, to
discuss revisions to the City's Official Plan
In commencing an OP review, the Planning Act requires that a special meeting of
Council be held to obtain input from the public (i.e. residents, businesses, community
associations, landowners, and the development industry) and affected agencies
regarding revisions to the Plan.
Staff is therefore seeking Council's authorization to advertise, in the appropriate
newspapers and on the City's website, that the City is seeking the views of the
public on the Plan. Mailings will also be used to advise agencies of the special
meeting. A special meeting of Council in spring 2007 is recommended.
Subsequently, a report on the submissions received will be prepared for Council's
consideration. Staff will also finalize and request Council's endorsement of the
work plan.
Report PD 04-07
Date: February 26, 2007
Subject: Pickering Official Plan Review
Page 6
"'.. 4 r<.
L' .:J
Attachments:
1. Official Plan: List of Outstanding Deferrals
2. Official Plan Review: Key Initiatives Hequiring Consideration
3. Official Plan Review: Preliminary Work Plan
Prepared By:
Approved I Endorsed By:
.,
..
^<~t
\ .
-.J
Grant McGregor, MCIP. RPP
Principal Planner - Policy
~f~
Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP
Manager, Policy
Neil Carr i' t I RPP
Director, Planning & Development
GM:ld
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
Director, Operations & Emergency Services
Division Head, Corporate Projects & Promotions
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering City Cou~cil
//
" e: ......
CdU
ATTACHMENT ,--L......TO
REPORT' PO OLI-D7
Official Plan: List of Outstanding Deferrals
1 Deferred all permissible uses for: Partially Resolved: Region of
: Regional Node 1 set out in Table 7 : Durham adopted Amendment No. 51
I pending further consideration and: to the Regional Plan on January 13,
I Regional Official Plan Amendment: 1999. Ontario Municipal Board
: Application 97-019 (now Amendment i approved Amendment No. 51 with
: No. 51) i modifications on November 18, 1999;
: : the decision on East Duffins is still
I i awaiting partial resolution of Deferral 7
i i to the Regional Plan respecting Dixie
i i Road and the road pattern in East
! I Duffins area
D5 1::::.m3:14 ............m............... ..............mmr~~~~~e~;;~e~~f~.~~~~clt~.t~ro~~~~f~~..I.....Unresolved.:........................... . .... ..m..m............. ..
.....................................<......................................m.....................I...~~.~...~~~.~~~.~.~..~~..~~.~...~.~~~~.~.~~~...~:i.~~~.~~..~.~~~.....J....................................m................m.........mm..............................................
D6 i 3.14 - Table 15 i Deferred Table 15: Permissible Uses i Unresolved.
i I for Potential Airport Site, for further i
i I study on the size and location of the i
.....................................l.............................................................l...~~~~.~.~.i.~.~..~.~.~~.~.~~...~~.~.~................................................................1........................................................................................................................
D8 I 4.15(a)(i) I Deferred reference to the request to i Unresolved.
I I the Region to re-examine and delete i
I I the proposed east-west arterial south i
I I of Whitevale, subject to further study i
.....................................1.............................................................I...~.~~.~.~.~.~..~~..=.~.~~~.~........................................................................1...... .. ..m....m.m...................... . .... ....mm...............m........... ... .........m.....mm....................m.....
D11 i 4.15(a)(iv) i Deferred reference to the request to i Partially Resolved: Ministry of
i ! the Region to re-examine and delete: Municipal Affairs and Housing
! i the proposed northerly and i approved related portion of Deferral
I ! southeasterly extensions of Dixie i #7 to the Regional Plan; Partial
! ! Road, subject to further study i Regional approval of the policy save
I I (northeast extension) and i and except the words "northerly and"
I ! consideration of Regional request to I came into effect on March 3, 1999
: i resolve in part Deferral #7 to the i
i i Regional Plan (southeast extension) :
....i5'1.2.....................r...~i':.1.5(ay(vr.........................T...beferred.....refe.re.nc.e.....to....t'he....reques{..to...rUnresoived.
i I the Region to re-examine and!
l : downgrade the designation of existing !
i ! Dixie Road to a Type C Arterial, !
I i subject to further study 1
......................................:..............................................................~...............................................................................................................................:.........................................................................................................................
D14 : 4.15(b) : Deferred reference to the request to : Unresolved.
! i the Region to re-examine and if:
l : necessary amend the proposed arterial :
! ! road network in Seaton, subject to :
! ! further stud related to Seaton :
D3
ATTACliMEN11--L_TO
REPORT' PO O.!:L:SI.l...-__
~.\5.. ".
, i . ..'~
l 'J.
i Deferred reference "re-examine and if i Unresolved.
! necessary amend thEI proposed arterial !
! road network around the Potential!
, I Airport Site", subject Ito further study :.. . ... .........................................................................................
....b"f9....................r.1..1..~.1.3(b)................................r..Oeferr.ed.......poiFcy......re.spectfng......p.ossfb"ie...!....u.il res'oived: City Council passed
! : high school site in Amberlea i Resolution #69/98, Item #4, Part
! i Neighbourhood, pending further review i 3.(b), on March 24, 1998, requesting
i : by Region i this deferral be resolved by deleting
I! I the policy
..."b2"6....................r.1..f:.1.4(bj"".............................T.""Defer.red......p.Olicy......on......re"diiCing......traiiic...l...ii"il.resolve.cC.............................................................................
: ! speeds along Dixie! Road as it is:
! : related to Deferral #7 in the Durham !
.....................................1.............................................................l...:.~~~.............................................................................................................1........................................................................................................................
D22 i 12.4(e) : Deferred policy requesting Region to : Unresolved.
i : construct a by-pass for Altona Road at :
i ! west end of WhitE~vale, subject to:
I I further study !
..."b24...................--r-..12j3(9f..............."(now...'....Oeferr.ed..........policy.........reierrtng..........to..........a...!....U"il.resolved~..............................................................................
: renumbered as! Highway 7 By-pass of Brougham,:
: (f)] ! pending consideration of Regional:
i i Amendment No. 37 to identify a future i
! j by-pass I
...b"3T....................r.Sch"ed.ui.e...j..........................!"""beferred.....th.e.....de.sfg~i.atfons.....wHjj"in...."tfie...i....U"il.resolved:............Reg.io.i1......o{.....D"u.r.ham....
i j East Duffins Area Study, pending i adopted Amendment No. 51 to the
! : consideration of Regional Amendment! Regional Plan on January 13, 1999.
i : Application 97-019 (now Amendment: Ontario Municipal Board approved
: : No. 51) i Amendment No. 51 with modifications
: i on November 18, 1999; Region of
: : Durham adopted Amendment No. 51
i : to the Regional Plan on January 13,
! : 1999. Ontario Municipal Board
: : approved Amendment No. 51 with
j i modifications on November 18, 1999;
i i City Council passed Resolution
: i #50/03 on April 22, 2003 requesting
: : the Region of Durham to resolve Part
i i of Deferral 31 as it relates to the
i i Duffin Heights Neighbourhood; the
: j decision on the Lamoureaux
: : Neighbourhood is awaiting the
i : completion of the Growth
i I Management Study
D15
,4.15(c)
" !::
. .~,
'....' u (.~
ATTACHMENT' _ I=- TO
flEPOfH # po-12.'-1.-o.L_""",,,
i Deferred Prestige Employment, Mixed i Unresolved,
j Employment and Natural Areas j
i designations and related policies for i
j certain Runnymede lands north of j
i Bayly Street, and west of' Church i
I Street, for further study 1
035 i Schedule I i Deferred lands designated Potential i Unresolved.
i j Airport Site, pending further study on i
i i the size and location of the potential i
",1""".""." "...mm".!m~i~.~~~~...~i~~..... .......m."m"........." ........................................"........m..m.. ...........1 .......................... .... ... ... .. ................. ....... ....................................... ........... ...."......................m....m...
1 Schedule" i Deferred road designations for the 1 Unresolved.
i i Seaton Urban Area, including the i
i i Transit Spine associated with Taunton i
i i Road and the future Type B Arterial i
i 1 Road associated with the proposed i
i i Fifth Concession - 14th Avenue i
1 j connection, but excluding Brock Road j
i i and Highway 407 and its interchanges, i
i i pending further study of matters related i
i i to the transportation services of Seaton i
I I and the Airport i
...b'39....................r.Sch.ediife..'j'j.......................r.Deferrecfroaci'deslgnatlons'io'..the..Easf"r..(J'il.resolve.cj';........."'R'e~j'io'n"""or"'6urham""
! i Duffins Study Area, including the! adopted Amendment No. 51 to the
i i Transit Spine associated with Taunton i Regional Plan on January 13, 1999.
! j Road, but excluding Brock Road and ! Ontario Municipal Board approved
1 i its associated Transit spine, pending i Amendment No. 51 with modifications
i i further study of matters related to the i on November 18, 1999; City Council
i i transportation services of Seaton and i passed resolution #50/03 on April 22,
1 i the Airport i 2003 requesting the Region of
i i i Durham to resolve Part of Deferral 39
i i i as it relates to the Duffin Heights
i i ! Neighbourhood; the decision on the
i i i Lamoureaux Neighbourhood is
i i i awaiting the completion of the Growth
i I I Management Study
....D40...................t..sch.ediife...ir......................j...Defer.r.ed...roa"d...des.ignfitions...re'iating...to...I....U'n.resolveti..............................................................................
i i the Airport, pending further study of!
i i matters related to the transportation !
I I services of Seaton and the Ai~port ,
.....................................i..............................................................j.................................................................................................".............................j...................,.....................................................................................................
042 j Schedules II and j Deferred future Highway 7 By-pass i Unresolved.
i IV-4 i designation related to Brougham, i
i i pending consideration of Regional l
i ! Amendment No. 37 to identify a future J
! ! b - ass j
038
II J ?r'\
'.=~=Jy
HEPORi' 11 p(l,._Ql:,~~~,~,..,
(~5'""
, .
\..' ,."J
Deferred the desi9nation of Altona
Road north of 81 proposed Fifth
Concession - 14th Avenue extension,
pending further study of matters related
to the transportation services of Seaton
and the Air ort
Unresolved.
[~~ "..m
t v'J
ATTACHMENT I
REPORT Ii PO
1-
_TO
{):l: ~7
General Plan
Review
Council
Resolutions
Sustainable
Neighbourhood
Plan
Benchmarking
Sustainability
Sustainable
Downtown
Pickering
Intensification
Study
Housekeeping
Duffin Heights
Neighbourhood
Environmental
Servicing Plan
(ESP)
Central Pickering
Development Plan
Provincial Policy
Statement (PPS),
March 2005
Greenbelt Plan,
Decem ber 2004
City
City
City
City
City
City
Sernas
Province
Province
Province
Review and update policies and designations affecting matters such as
housing, cultural heritage, minimum distance separation formula,
population targets, planning horizon, and accessibility for persons with
disabilities.
Address outstanding Council resolutions on waste transfer/processing,
archaeological master plan, and Whitevale Heritage Conservation District
extensibn.
Finalize Sustainable Nei!ghbourhood Design Guidelines (Phase 3 of the
Growth Management Study) for Council's approval. Add new policies to
the Plan requiring development proponents to address sustainable design
principles.
Phase Two Work Pro~lram for the Benchmarking initiative currently
underway. Add Sustainable Pickering indicators and targets to the Plan.
Undertake a visioning process for downtown Pickering and establish a
long-range strategy for achieving an attractive, vibrant, and sustainable
downtown. Add new polic:ies and designations to the Plan where required.
Editorial and minor updatE~s to the Plan.
ESP under preparation. Results of the Environmental Servicing Plan by
June 2007, which may require land-use and transportation amendments to
the Plan.
Approved May 2006. Requires City to prepare a Master Environmental
Servicing Plan, Neighbourhood Plans and Design Guidelines for the
Seaton community. Two other studies, the Natural Heritage System
Management Plan and the Highway 407 Employment Lands Study
currently underway by Province. Add new policies and designations to the
Plan where required.
Approved March 2005. Requires municipalities to update their official plan
to be consistent with the PPS.
Approved February 2005. Requires municipalities to implement the
Greenbelt Policies and Schedules as part of its five year Official Plan
review.
t."'"ll',CHh.mn /I 2. TO
hfi'QRI Ii PD_ Q4 -07
'.'5"""
t'. a
Growth Plan for
the Greater
Golden Horseshoe
Population,
employment and
urban land
requirements
Bill 51 (Planning
and Conservation
Land Statute Law
Amendment Act)
Amendment 114
to the Regional
Official Plan
Generic
Regulation,
Ontario Regulation
166/06
Duffins Creek and
Carruthers Creek
Watershed Plan
Draft Terrestrial
Natural Heritage
System Strategy
Draft Rouge River
Watershed Plan,
November 2006
Province
Province
Province
Region
Conservation
Authorities
TRCA
TRCA
TRCA
Approved June 2006. Requires municipalities to implement the Growth
Plan's policies and schedules before June 16,2009.
Pending discussion with Province and Region as part of the Growth Plan
conformity exercise. Requires the City to incorporate population,
employment targets and urban land boundaries in Plan.
Approved January 2007. Certain parts of the Bill require municipalities to
implement the provisions of the Bill 51 Regulations while other parts are at
the municipality's discretion. For example, municipalities can add policies
to an Official Plan providing Council the option of zoning with conditions on
a planning application. Add new policies to the Plan where required and
use new planning tools and powers.
Approved September 2006. Requires municipalities to implement new
Regional environmental, rural, commercial and transportation policies in
local Official Plans.
Approved May 2006. Under the Generic Regulation, a broader scope of
natural features and activities, including development within regulated
areas and interference or alteration to watercourses, wetlands and
shoreline are now regulated. Implement the regulated area by amendment
to the Plan where appropriate.
Approved August 2003. Appropriate mechanisms to implement the
Watershed Plan under review.
Draft Strategy released August 2006 for review and comment. May require
mapping and policies changes to recognize and protect the natural heritage
features identified by TRCA.
Draft Plan released November 2006 for review and comment.
require policy changes to the Plan.
May
-\ 5 ,-.,
u' u
x
3:
(])
'>
(])
0::
c
co
0::
~
(])
c
(])
(9
.
-
c
(])
E
"t:l
C
(])
E
<(
x
en
c
o
:;::;
::J
"'6
en
(])
0::
'0
C
::J
o
()
.
c
(])
E
"t:l
C
(])
E
<(
ATTACHMEf\lT :fI
flEPom if PD
3 _TO
04 -ci7
~--.
x
en
(])
,E:
Q)
"t:l
'5
(9
c
0)
'00
(])
o
"t:l
o
o
.s::
....
o
.0
.s::
0)
'(ij
Z
(])
::c
co
c
'co
-
en
::J
(f)
.
-
c
(])
E
"t:l
C
(])
E
<(
x
~
:.c
co
c
'co
1;)
::J
(j')
0)
c
~
....
co
E
.s::
()
c
(])
!Xl
.
c
(])
E
"t:l
C
(])
E
<(
x
>.
0)
(])
-
~
-
(j')
c
o
:;::;
co
()
;;::
'00
c
.$
c
c
3:
o
-
c
3:
o
o
(])
::c
co
c
'co
-
en
::J
(j')
.
-
c
(])
E
"t:l
C
(])
E
<(
.
x
x
0)
c
'0..
(])
(])
~
(])
en
::J
o
I
1Y
c
(])
E
c
e
'>
c
LU
"t:l
o
o
.s::
....
::J
o
.0
.s::
0)
- 'Qj -
53 Z 53
E enc E
:E~
-g 0) Cl. -g
(]) '(ij (])
E IcE
<( c:Q <(
lEe:
::J (])
O(j')
.
x
c
~
Cl.
-
c
(])
E
a.
o
Q)
>
(])
o
0)
c
'C
(])
~
()
0:
~
-
c
(])
()
.
-
c
(])
E
"t:l
C
(])
E
<(
x
iO
o
o
~
-
c
(])
E
(])
-
ro
en
>.
,!d
"'6
Cl.
ro
'0
c
'>
e
Cl.
.
-
c
(])
E
"t:l
C
(])
E
<(
0)
,E:
E
....
.E
c
o
()
.
x
c
~
Cl.
-
c
(])
E
"t:l
C
(])
E
<(
0)
,E:
E
....
.E
c
o
()
-
Q)
.0
C
(])
(])
(5
$l7T ACHMENT # _ 5 TO
REPORJ II PD_...!?'-l-O 7.__
,..... --. ~~.1f
, I.!~I,
tv; (
.
.
.
.
. .
. .
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
"'0 i:J ----
I:: c
c ro
.!!l co a::
-J .:::t:
C I:: ro ID c
ro 2 ~ ro
.0 .0 0 0::
L- co :E
...... ::I c:::;::;- ...... ...... -0
C 0 C C f/)
L- ID "'0 <I> U ID ID L- ID
ID c ro ID ...... ...... .J:: ......
...... E ro Cf)oq:: E E .J:: C C f/) c
ro "'0 1::..... c -0 -0 - ID ID L- ID
~ - o I:: .Q ::I ID
c c c C L- E E E
0<1> L- ......
(9 ID ID i:J~ C) ID Of/) ID ro "'0 -0 ro "'0
E E ID E E 0 c c S c
ID 0:: c
<( >> I:: I:: <( 0 <( ID ID ID
.J:: 0 - "'0 ....
- - co <I> ...... :p E E ID E
L- C) a.. c 2'E: c -.;t C) .!!l C) c c <( <( > <(
.E oS E ID ID ..- c c ro ro a:
E E . c: <;( E ..- E ::I E .:::t:- co co co
Q) f/) C) IDa..
c .... ...... -0 I:: S: "'0 C .... ID .... :p :p ID :p
ro ID .E - c c c .E 0:: .E ID-o c c C) c
-0 C ID ID ~co ID ID .... ID ID 1B ::I ID
0...J:: C 2E E Q-J E E C u C O.J:: ...... 0 ......
.J::f/) 0 ro ID -<I> "'0 0 .C 0 f/) ~ 0 0 0:: 0
~51 0 - .... <( ..- ..... <( C 0 ID 0 .s ID 0.. 0.. 0..
::1.- LO.2 ID C .:t::
0..::1 :t::-
0"" :=.E E ID ::I ro ro
.... 0 o ID ....
(9:1: 0...... roC/) <( (9 os 0