Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
June 26, 2006 (Joint)
Executive Committeel Council Meeting Agenda Monday, June 26,2006 Council Chambers 7:30 pm PRE-MEETING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR 6:45 pm I) INVOCA TION Mayor Ryan will call the meeting to order and lead Council in the saying of the Invocation. II) DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST III) ADOPTION OF MINUTES PAGE Executive Committee Meeting of June 12, 2006 1-21 "In Camera" Executive Meeting of June 12, 2006 'In Camera" Council Meeting of June 19, 2006 Under Separate Cover IV) PRESENTATIONS V) DELEGA TIONS VI) CORRESPONDENCE VII) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE REPORT Executive Committee Report EC # 2006-11 22-278 VIII) REPORTS - NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS 279-321 a) Audit Committee Report AC # 2006-02 b) Audit Committee Minutes (For Information Only) IX) MOTIONS AND NOTICE OF MOTIONS 322-323 X) BY-LAWS 324-326 XI) OTHER BUSINESS XII) CONFIRMATION BY-LAW XIII) ADJOURNMENT Executive Committeel Council Meeting Agenda Monday, June 26,2006 Council Chambers 7:30 pm FOR INFORMATION ONLY Waterfront Coordinating Committee Minutes, dated May 25, 2006 Statutory Public Information Meeting Minutes, dated June 1, 2006 Od! Executive Committee Meeting Minutes Monday June 12, 2006 7:50 pm Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Dickerson PRESENT: Mayor Ryan COUNCILLORS: K. Ashe M. Brenner D. Dickerson R. Johnson B. McLean D. Pickles ALSO PRESENT: 1. J. Quinn - Chief Administrative Officer (attended for part of the meeting) E. Buntsma - Director, Operations & Emergency Services N. Carroll - Director, Planning & Development G. Paterson - Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer D. Bentley - City Clerk L. Taylor - Manager, Development Review C. Rose - Policy Manager S. Karwowski - Manager, Finance & Taxation (I) DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Councillor Ashe declared a conflict of interest in accordance with the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act with respect to Item # 3 of the 'In Camera' matters related to correspondence from the Chief Administrative Officer, Department Heads, City Solicitor and Division Head, Projects & Policy with respect to the Central Pickering Development -Seaton/Oak Ridges Moraine Land Exchange Environmental Assessment. Councillor Ashe left the room during the discussion and vote on the matter. (II) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Director, Planning & Development, Report PO 35-06 Amendment to Fill and Topsoil Disturbance Bv-Iaw 6060/02 Moved by Councillor Johnson Seconded by Councillor Pickles Executive Committee Meeting Minutes Monday June 12, 2006 7:50 pm Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Dickerson 1. That Report PO 35-06 of the Director, Planning & Development be received; and 2. That the Amendment to Fill and Topsoil Disturbance By-law 6060/02, as set out in Appendix I to Report PO 35-06, be forwarded to City Council for enactment. CARRIED 2. Director, Planning & Development, Report PO 36-06 Environmental Servicing Plan (ESP) Duffin Heights Neighbourhood City of Pickerinq Brief discussion ensued on this matter. A question and answer period ensued. Moved by Mayor Ryan Seconded by Councillor Brenner 1. That Report PO 36-06 of the Director, Planning & Development be received; 2. That Council endorse the draft Terms of Reference for the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Environmental Servicing Plan (ESP) as outlined in Attachment #3 to Report PO 36-06 and authorize City staff to: a) Retain the services of an engineering consulting firm to assist and provide expertise to the City in the preparation of the ESP with an upset limit of $30,000 to be paid for by Mattamy Homes; and b) Undertake its best efforts to recover the costs of the ESP, including the City's consultant costs, from landowners/developers within the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood; and c) Reimburse Mattamy Homes, to the extent costs are recovered, in undertaking the Environmental Servicing Plan including costs under (a) above; and d) Enter into any agreements necessary in a form satisfactory to the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer and the City Solicitor, to provide for the foregoing; 003 Executive Committee Meeting Minutes Monday June 12, 2006 7:50 pm Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Dickerson 3. That the City Clerk forward a copy of Report PO 36-06 to the Region of Durham Works Department, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Mattamy Homes and Coughlan Homes; and 4. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to give effect thereto. CARRIED 3. Director, Planning & Development, Report PO 37-06 Durham Regional Official Plan Review Proposed Amendments for Population Employment and Urban Land Moved by Mayor Ryan Seconded by Councillor Ashe 1. That Council receive Report PO 37-06 as the City's comments on the Supplementary Attachment to the Proposed Amendment to the Durham Regional Official Plan for Population, Employment and Urban Land, dated April 25, 2006; 2. That Council request the Region to revise the Proposed Amendment for Population, Employment and Urban Land of the Durham Regional Official Plan to incorporate the revisions as set out in Appendix I to Report PO 37-06, which among other matters, would include the following: (i) identify the lands around Kinsale as an Urban Study Area instead of a Living Area on Schedule 'A' - Map A4 - Regional Structure; (ii) identify the lands east and south of Greenwood located outside the Greenbelt Plan, within the Urban Area Boundary and as an Urban Study Area on Schedule 'A' - Map A4 - Regional Structure, instead of Major Open Space; (iii) adopt a policy for the Kinsale and Greenwood Urban Study Areas to permit redesignation of the study area lands for urban uses following further review; (iv) identify the Cherrywood Community as a Future Urban Policy Area on Schedule 'A' - Map A4 - Regional Structure; (v) adopt a policy for the Cherrywood Future Urban Policy Area similar to the following: l'04 Executive Committee Meeting Minutes Monday June 12, 2006 7:50 pm Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Dickerson "Regional Council acknowledges that the Provincial Greenbelt Plan and other legislation restricts urban designation of the Cherrywood Community, in the City of Pickering, at this time. However, should such restrictions be removed in the future, the Region intends to pursue urban designations for the Cherrywood Community, and, to this end, has identified the Cherrywood Community as a Future Urban Policy Area"; (vi) revise the population and employment forecast table to increase the share for Pickering (and Whitby) reflecting a reallocation of the surplus Ajax population and employment forecasts to Pickering (and Whitby); and (vii) reduce the net (developable) land area ratio to at least 50% of the gross (total) land area to reflect current development and environmental protection standards; and, if necessary, conduct a study of recent development standards as back-up; and, 3. That the City Clerk forward a copy of Report PO 37-06 to the Region of Durham and to local municipalities in Durham Region. CARRIED 4. Director, Operations & Emergency Services, Report OES 25-06 Supply and Delivery of 4-Ton Truck Quotation No. 20-2006 Moved by Councillor Johnson Seconded by Councillor Brenner 1. That Report OES 25-06 regarding the supply and delivery of a 4 Ton Dump Truck be received; 2. That Quotation No. Q-20-2006 submitted by Scarborough Truck Centre Inc. for the supply and delivery of a 4 Ton Dump Truck with snow plow and wing, and electronic salt metering in the amount of $157,624 (GST, PST and license extra) be accepted; 3. That the total gross purchase cost of $180,432.36 and a net purchase cost of $170,974.92 be approved; 4. That Council authorize the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer to finance the project through the issuance of debt; 005 Executive Committee Meeting Minutes Monday June 12, 2006 7 :50 pm Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Dickerson a) That debt financing through the Region of Durham in the amount of $170,000.00 for a period not exceeding five (5) years, at a rate to be determined, be approved and the balance of approximately $975 plus financing costs be financed from current funds; b) That financing and repayment charges in the amount of approximately $39,000 be included in the annual Current Budget for the City of Pickering commencing in 2007 and continuing thereafter until the loan is repaid; c) That the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer has certified that this loan and the repayment thereof falls within the City's debt and financial obligations approved annual repayment limit for debt and other financial obligations for 2006 as established by the Province for municipalities in Ontario; d) That the Treasurer be authorized to take any actions necessary in order to effect the foregoing; and e) That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be given the authority to give effect hereto. CARRIED 5. Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, Report CS 28-06 2006 Tax Rates for all Classes of Property and Final Tax Due Dates For All Realty Tax Classes Except for Commercial, Industrial and Multi-Residential Reality Classes Moved by Councillor Brenner Seconded by Councillor McLean 1. That Report CS 28-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be received; 2. That the 2006 Residential tax rates for the City of Pickering be approved as contained in Schedule A to draft By-law No. 6676/06 attached hereto; 3. That the tax levy due dates for the Final Billing be July 7, 2006 and September 28, 2006 excluding the industrial, multi-residential and commercial realty tax classes; Executive Committee Meeting Minutes Monday June 12, 2006 7:50 pm Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Dickerson 4. That the attached draft By-law No. 6676/06 providing for the imposition of the tax rates approved under Recommendation 1 above, be read three times and approved; 5. That the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be authorized to make any changes or undertake any actions necessary, including altering due dates, in order to ensure the tax billing process is completed; 6. That the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be authorized to make any changes to the final tax rates to comply with Provincial regulations; and 7. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary actions to give effect thereto: CARRIED 6. Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, Report CS 30-06 2005 Pre-Audit Balances of Reserves and Reserve Funds Moved by Councillor Johnson Seconded by Mayor Ryan That Report CS 30-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be received for information. CARRIED 7. Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, Report CS 31-06 Chanqe to User Fee By-law Due to Reduction in GST Moved by Councillor Johnson Seconded by Councillor Ashe 1. That Report CS 31-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be received; 2. That Council enact the attached General Municipal Fees and Charges By- law which provides for revised 2006 fees and charges, where applicable, adjusted to reflect the reduction in the Goods and Services Taxes (GST); and 3. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary actions to give effect thereto. CARRIED IJ07 Executive Committee Meeting Minutes Monday June 12, 2006 7:50 pm Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Dickerson 8. Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, Report CS 32-06 Cash Position Report as at March 31. 2006 Moved by Councillor Brenner Seconded by Councillor Johnson That Report CS 32-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be received for information. CARRIED (II) OTHER BUSINESS 1. Councillor Pickles extended his thanks for all the work that was done to make "Tapestry Day" a success on Sunday, June 11,2006. 2. Councillor Ryan extended council appreciation for staff this busy weekend in relation to the Frenchman's Bay Festival. 3. The following matters were considered prior to the regular meeting: Moved by Mayor Ryan Seconded by Councillor Brenner That Council move into a closed meeting of Committee in order to discuss a matter subject to litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the City; the receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. CARRIED Refer to the 'In Camera' minutes of June 12, 2006, 1. Verbal Update from the City Solicitor with respect to the negotiations with the Town of Whitby related to the Pickerinq-Aiax-Whitby Animal Shelter Moved by Councillor McLean Seconded by Councillor Johnson That the recommendation contained in the 'In Camera' Executive Minutes dated June 12, 2006, be adopted. CARRIED Executive Committee Meeting Minutes Monday June 12, 2006 7:50 pm Council Chambers Chair: Councillor Dickerson 2. Verbal Update from the Director, Operations & Emergency Services with respect to the Western Gateway Leqal Aqreement Moved by Councillor Brenner Seconded by Mayor Ryan That the recommendations contained in the 'In Camera' Executive Minutes dated June 12, 2006 be adopted. CARRIED 3. Correspondence from the Chief Administrative Officer, Department Heads, City Solicitor and Division Head, Projects & Policy with respect to the Central Pickering Development Seaton/Oak Ridges Moraine Land Exchange Environmental Assessment Detailed discussion ensued on this matter. Moved by Councillor Johnson Seconded by Mayor Ryan That the Committee rise and ratify the actions taken. CARRIED (III) ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:22 p.m. 009 Council Meeting Minutes Monday, June 19, 2006 7:30 PM PRESENT: Mayor David Ryan COUNCILLORS: K. Ashe M. Brenner D. Dickerson R. Johnson B. McLean D. Pickles ALSO PRESENT: 1. J. Quinn E. Buntsma N. Carroll G. Paterson D. Bentley D. Shields - Chief Administrative Officer - Director, Operations & Emergency Services - Director, Planning & Development - Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer - City Clerk - Deputy Clerk I) INVOCATION Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order and led Council in the saying of the Invocation. II) ADOPTION OF MINUTES Moved by Councillor Dickerson Seconded by Councillor Johnson Council Meeting of June 5, 2006 "In Camera" Council Meeting of June 5, 2006 CARRIED Council Meeting Minutes Monday, June 19, 2006 7:30 PM III) PRESENTATIONS 1. Doug Fergusen The Lifesaving Society Presentinq Council with the Burlinqton CuP Doug Fergusen of the Royal Lifesaving Society appeared before Council to present the City of Pickering with the Burlington Cup for the second year in a row. Mr. Fergusen noted that the Burlington Cup was presented to the Municipality that trains the most people in Ontario. Staff were commended for a job well done. 2. Councillor Brenner Chair, Benchmarking Sustainability Standards Committee Re: Report No. CO 01-06 Sustainability Pickering A Framework for Benchmarking Sustainability fRefer to Aqenda Paqes 29-491 Councillor Brenner, Chair, Benchmarking Sustainability Standards Committee appeared before Council to provide an update and brief presentation on the Committee's accomplishments. He noted that the Committee was established to benchmark standards for sustainability in Pickering through a consultation process with wide cross representation from all sectors of the Community. Councillor Brenner stated that Phase I of the Sustainable Pickering journey is now complete and the Committee is now entering Phase II which will continue to build a Sustainable Pickering. Councillor Brenner thanked the Committee members for their commitment, as well as Members of Council for their support. (IV) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE REPORT Executive Committee Report EC 2006-10 of the meeting held on June 12,2006 1. Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 35-06 Amendment to Fill and Topsoil Disturbance By-law 6060/02 1. That Report PD 35-06 of the Director, Planning & Development be received; and 011 Council Meeting Minutes Monday, June 19, 2006 7:30 PM 2. That the Amendment to Fill and Topsoil Disturbance By-law 6060/02, as set out in Appendix I to Report PO 35-06, be forwarded to City Council for enactment. 2. Director, Planning & Development, Report PO 36-06 Environmental Servicing Plan (ESP) Duffin Heights Neighbourhood City of Pickerinq 1. That Report PO 36-06 of the Director, Planning & Development be received; 2. That Council endorse the draft Terms of Reference for the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood Environmental Servicing Plan (ESP) as outlined in Attachment #3 to Report PO 36-06 and authorize City staff to: a) Retain the services of an engineering consulting firm to assist and provide expertise to the City in the preparation of the ESP with an upset limit of $30,000 to be paid for by Mattamy Homes; b) Undertake its best efforts to recover the costs of the ESP, including the City's consultant costs, from landowners/developers within the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood; c) Reimburse Mattamy Homes, to the extent costs are recovered, in undertaking the Environmental Servicing Plan including costs under (a) above; d) Enter into any agreements necessary in a form satisfactory to the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer and the City Solicitor, to provide for the foregoing; 3. That the City Clerk forward a copy of Report PO 36-06 to the Region of Durham Works Department, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Mattamy Homes and Coughlan Homes; and 4. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to give effect thereto. 3. Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 37-06 Durham Regional Official Plan Review Proposed Amendments for Population Employment and Urban Land Council Meeting Minutes Monday, June 19, 2006 7:30 PM 1. That Council receive Report PO 37-06 as the City's comments on the Supplementary Attachment to the Proposed Amendment to the Durham Regional Official Plan for Population, Employment and Urban Land, dated April 25, 2006; 2. That Council request the Region to revise the Proposed Amendment for Population, Employment and Urban Land of the Durham Regional Official Plan to incorporate the revisions as set out in Appendix I to Report PO 37- 06, which among other matters, would include the following: (i) identify the lands around Kinsale as an Urban Study Area instead of a Living Area on Schedule 'A' - Map A4 - Regional Structure; (ii) identify the lands east and south of Greenwood located outside the Greenbelt Plan, within the Urban Area Boundary and as an Urban Study Area on Schedule 'A' - Map A4 - Regional Structure, instead of Major Open Space; (iii) adopt a policy for the Kinsale and Greenwood Urban Study Areas to permit redesignation of the study area lands for urban uses following further review; (iv) identify the Cherrywood Community as a Future Urban Policy Area on Schedule 'A' - Map A4 - Regional Structure; (v) adopt a policy for the Cherrywood Future Urban Policy Area similar to the following: "Regional Council acknowledges that the Provincial Greenbelt Plan and other legislation restricts urban designation of the Cherrywood Community, in the City of Pickering, at this time. However, should such restrictions be removed in the future, the Region intends to pursue urban designations for the Cherrywood Community, and, to this end, has identified the Cherrywood Community as a Future Urban Policy Area."; (vi) revise the population and employment forecast table to increase the share for Pickering (and Whitby) reflecting a reallocation of the surplus Ajax population and employment forecasts to Pickering (and Whitby); and (vii) reduce the net (developable) land area ratio to at least 50% of the gross (total) land area to reflect current development and environmental protection standards; and, if necessary, conduct a study of recent development standards as back-up; and, 013 Council Meeting Minutes Monday, June 19, 2006 7:30 PM 3. That the City Clerk forward a copy of Report PO 37-06 to the Region of Durham and to local municipalities in Durham Region. 4. Director, Operations & Emergency Services, Report OES 25-06 Supply and Delivery of 4-Ton Truck Quotation No. 20-2006 1. That Report OES 25-06 regarding the supply and delivery of a 4 Ton Dump Truck be received; 2. That Quotation No. Q-20-2006 submitted by Scarborough Truck Centre Inc. for the supply and delivery of a 4 Ton Dump Truck with snow plow and wing, and electronic salt metering in the amount of $157,624 (GST, PST and license extra) be accepted; 3. That the total gross purchase cost of $180,432.36 and a net purchase cost of $170,974.92 be approved; 4. That Council authorize the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer to finance the project through the issuance of debt; a) That debt financing through the Region of Durham in the amount of $170,000.00 for a period not exceeding five (5) years, at a rate to be determined, be approved and the balance of approximately $975 plus financing costs be financed from current funds; b) That financing and repayment charges in the amount of approximately $39,000 be included in the annual Current Budget for the City of Pickering commencing in 2007 and continuing thereafter until the loan is repaid; c) That the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer has certified that this loan and the repayment thereof falls within the City's debt and financial obligations approved annual repayment limit for debt and other financial obligations for 2006 as established by the Province for municipalities in Ontario; d) That the Treasurer be authorized to take any actions necessary in order to effect the foregoing; and 5. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be given the authority to give effect hereto. Council Meeting Minutes Monday, June 19, 2006 7:30 PM 5. Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, Report CS 28-06 2006 Tax Rates for all Classes of Property and Final Tax Due Dates For All Realty Tax Classes Except for Commercial, Industrial and Multi-Residential Reality Classes 1. That Report CS 28-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be received; 2. That the 2006 Residential tax rates for the City of Pickering be approved as contained in Schedule A to draft By-law No. 6676/06 attached hereto; 3. That the tax levy due dates for the Final Billing be July 7, 2006 and September 28, 2006 excluding the industrial, multi-residential and commercial realty tax classes; 4. That the attached draft By-law No. 6676/06 providing for the imposition of the tax rates approved under Recommendation 1 above, be read three times and approved; 5. That the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be authorized to make any changes or undertake any actions necessary, including altering due dates, in order to ensure the tax billing process is completed; 6. That the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be authorized to make any changes to the final tax rates to comply with Provincial regulations; and 7. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary actions to give effect thereto: 6. Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, Report CS 30-06 2005 Pre-Audit Balances of Reserves and Reserve Funds That Report CS 30-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be received for information. (ì 1 (':' ..j \.) Council Meeting Minutes Monday, June 19, 2006 7:30 PM 8. Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, Report CS 32-06 Cash Position Report as at March 31, 2006 That Report CS 32-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be received for information. 9. Verbal Update from the City Solicitor with respect to the negotiations with the Town of Whitby related to the Pickerinq-Aiax-Whitby Animal Shelter That the recommendation contained in the 'In Camera' Executive Committee minutes dated June 12,2006 be adopted. 10. Verbal Update from the Director, Operations & Emergency Services with respect to the Western Gateway Leqal AQreement That the recommendations contained in the 'In Camera' Executive Committee minutes dated June 12, 2006 be adopted. Resolution # 81/06 Moved by Councillor Dickerson Seconded by Councillor Pickles That the Report of the Executive Committee EC 2006-10, dated June 12, 2006, be adopted, save and except Item 7 thereof. CARRIED 7. Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, Report CS 31-06 Chanqe to User Fee By-law Due to Reduction in GST Resolution # 82/06 Moved by Councillor Dickerson Seconded by Councillor Pickles 1. That Report CS 31-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be received; 2. That Council enact the attached General Municipal Fees and Charges By-law which provides for revised 2006 fees and charges, where Council Meeting Minutes Monday, June 19, 2006 7:30 PM applicable, adjusted to reflect the reduction in the Goods and Services Taxes (GST); and 3. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the necessary actions to give effect thereto. CARRIED V) REPORTS NEW & UNFINISHED 1. Councillor Brenner, Report CO 01-06 Chair, Benchmarking Sustainability Standards Committee Sustainability Pickering A Framework for Benchmarkinq Sustainabilitv Resolution # 83/06 Moved by Councillor Brenner Seconded by Councillor Dickerson 1. That Council receive report CO 01-06 regarding Benchmarking Sustainability Standards, including the June 2006 report prepared by the ROC Group entitled Sustainable Pickering: A Framework for Benchmarking Sustainability, as set out in Attachment 1 ; 2. That Council endorse the Phase Two Work Program for the Benchmarking initiative, as set out in the ROC report, and authorize the Benchmarking Committee to continue to work on this initiative with the continued assistance of staff, the ROC Group, the community and others, using the remaining available funds approved by Council in the 2006 budget for this benchmarking project; 3. That Council request the CAO to report back on the feasibility of establishing a "Sustainability Coordinator" or similar position for the City, funded with the assistance of outside sources including project partners and any available grant programs; 4. That Council agrees to the City's participation in the "Walk 21" conference to be held in Toronto in 2007, provided that the City's contribution to work leading up to the conference does not exceed $1500 in 2006; and 017 Council Meeting Minutes Monday, June 19, 2006 7:30 PM 5. That a copy of this report be forwarded to Durham Region, Enbridge, Veridian, Ontario Power Generation, UOIT, Toronto & Region Conservation Authority and others interested in this initiative. CARRIED VI) MOTIONS AND NOTICE OF MOTIONS Transport Canada - Federal Airport Lands Due Diliç¡ence Review of Airport Master Plan Resolution # 84/06 Moved by Councillor Pickles Seconded by Councillor Johnson Whereas Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering passed Resolution #207/05 on November 21, 2005 with respect to supporting the due diligence review of the Greater Toronto Airports Authority's Master Plan for the Federal Lands in Pickering. Whereas in the Resolution Council requested that the Federal Minister of Transport be requested to ensure that the due diligence review provides ample opportunity for Pickering Council and interested members of the community to participate in the process. Whereas in the Resolution Council requested the Federal Minister of Transport ensure the due diligence review includes (but is not necessarily be limited to) a number of specific considerations listed in the Resolution. Whereas the City of Pickering understands that the Federal Minister of Transport has indicated that the due diligence review will not provide an opportunity for Pickering Councilor members of the community to comment on the drafting of the Terms of Reference or participate in the due diligence review process. Now therefore the Council of the City of Pickering urge the Federal Minister of Transport to provide an opportunity for Pickering Council and members of the community to comment on the drafting of the Terms of Reference or the participate in the due diligence review process. That the Council of the City of Pickering urge the Federal Minister of Transport to ensure the due diligence review includes (but is not necessarily be limited to) a the considerations listed in the Resolution Council Meeting Minutes Monday, June 19, 2006 7:30 PM That Transport Canada be requested to provide head count funding to the City of Pickering with respect to untoward staffing costs. That a copy of this Report and resolutions be forwarded to the Local Management Office of Transport Canada, Federal Minister of Transport, the Greater Toronto Airports Authority, the Region of Durham, Members of Parliament for Ajax-Pickering and Pickering-Scarborough East, and Member of Provincial Parliament for Pickering-Ajax-Uxbridge. CARRIED ON A RECORDED VOTE AS FOLLOWS: YEA NAY Councillor Ashe Councillor Brenner Councillor Dickerson Councillor Johnson Councillor McLean Councillor Pickles Mayor Ryan VII) BY-LAWS 6676/06 Being a by-law to adopt the estimates of all sums required to be raised by taxation for the year 2006 and to establish the Tax Rates necessary to raise such sums and establish the final due dates for the residential, pipeline, farmland and managed forest realty tax classes. 6677/06 Being a by-law to amend By-law 6191/03 to confirm General Municipal Fees and Charges pursuant to the Municipal Act, 2001. 6678/06 Being a by-law to appoint Special Municipal Law Enforcement Officers for the Purpose of Enforcing Parking Restrictions on Private Property. 6679/06 Being a By-law to amend By-law 6604/05 providing for the regulation of traffic and parking on highways, private property and municipal property within the City of Pickering. This by-law implements the recommendations of Report OES U19 Council Meeting Minutes Monday, June 19, 2006 7:30 PM 23-2006 passed on June 5,2006 with respect to All-Way Stop Controls at Rougemount Drive at Pine Ridge Drive. 6680/06 Being a by-law to amend By-law #6060/02, the Fill and Topsoil Disturbance By-law. THIRD READING: Councillor Johnson, seconded by Councillor Brenner moved that By-law Numbers 6676/06 to 6680/06 be adopted and the said by-laws be now read a third time and passed and that the Mayor and Clerk sign the same and the seal of the Corporation be affixed thereto. CARRIED VIII) OTHER BUSINESS 1. Councillor Dickerson gave notice that he would be bringing a Notice of Motion forward with respect to 'Innovative Speed Enforcement of Pickering Streets' at the June 26th, 2006 meeting of Executive/Council. A copy of the Notice of Motion was provided as a handout. 2. The following matters were considered prior to the regular meeting: Moved by Councillor Dickerson Seconded by Councillor Pickles That Council move 'In Camera' for the purposes of the security of the property of the municipality. CARRIED a) Verbal Update from the Chief Administrative Officer with respect to a Bankinq Matter A confidential verbal update was received from the Chief Administrative Officer with respect to a banking matter. Moved by Councillor Pickles Seconded by Councillor Dickerson Council Meeting Minutes Monday, June 19, 2006 7:30 PM That Council rise and ratify the actions taken at the 'In Camera' meeting. CARRIED b) Verbal Update from the Director, Operations & Emergency Services with respect to new Bus Route Requests The Director, Operations & Emergency Services provided a brief verbal update with respect to the request to Durham Region Transit concerning the Claremont bus to Whitevale etc. He advised that he had contacted Durham Region Transit but to date had received no reply and further advised that he would keep Council updated upon receipt of a response. c) Verbal Update from the Director, Planning & Development with respect to the request for Street Naming after 'Hawkeye' and the commemorative plaque for 'Last of the Mohicans' The Director, Planning & Development updated Council with respect to email requests that had been received with respect to naming a street in Pickering, namely at the end of Valley Farm Road, end of the Third Concession after 'Hawkeye' and a commemorative plaque for the 'Last of the Mohicans'. He advised that the street in question was not suitable as it was a portion of Rossland Road, which is a major arterial road. It was the concensus of Council that the Director of Planning & Development thank the requestors for their submission and interest, and further advise of why Council cannot consider their request at this time. d) Verbal Update from the Chief Administrative Officer with respect to the Toy Avenue Oil Spill The Chief Administrative Officer provided a brief update with respect to the communication protocol to be followed in matters of this nature. IX) CONFIRMATION BY-LAW By-law Number 6681/06 Councillor Johnson, seconded by Councillor Dickerson moved for leave to introduce a By-law of the City of Pickering to confirm those proceedings of the 021. Council Meeting Minutes Monday, June 19, 2006 7:30 PM Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering at its Regular Meeting of June 19th, 2006. CARRIED X) ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:00 pm. DATED this 19th day of June, 2006. MAYOR DAVID RYAN DEBIA.BENTLEY CITY CLERK CiÚ¡ D~ L" ? ,) , t-.., I.." June 26, 2006 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE REPORT Executive Committee Report EC 2006-11 1. Director, Planning & Development, Report PO 38-06 Goldenridge Road Extension/Rushton Road Road Dedication and Naming By-law Road Closing and Transfers of Land to Adjacent Owners Abandonment of Easements By-laws should be enacted to: (a) dedicate and name certain parts of lots within Registrar's Compiled Plan 1051, being those parts of Lots 48,49, 50, 51 52, 53, 54, 117 and 118, designated as Parts 16 to 20, 40R-23842, Parts 1 and 2, 40R-23817, Parts 1 and 2, 40R-22516, Part 6, 40R-21832, Part 9, 40R-21831, Block 29, Plan 40M-2299 as Goldenridge Road and Block 30, Plan 40M-2299 as Rushton Road; (b) stop-up and close certain portions of Goldenridge Road lying within Registrar's Compiled Plan 1051, being those parts of Lots 54 and 117, designated as Parts 10,11,21 and 22, 40R-21831 and Parts 7,9, 15 and 16, 40R-21832 as public highway; (c) declare the lands within Registrar's Compiled Plan 1051, being those parts of Lots 54 and 117 designated as Parts 10, 11, 21 and 22, 40R-21831 and Parts 7,9, 15 and 16, 40R-21832 (portions of Goldenridge Road) surplus to the needs of the Corporation for the purpose of sale to the abutting owners, in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Act and the Acquisition and Disposal of Land Policy subject to any required easements; (d) abandon the easements, in favour of the City, for road maintenance purposes, over those lands lying within Registrar's Compiled Plan 1051, being those parts of Lots 54, 116 and 117, designated as Parts 12, 13, 20 and 23, 40R-21831 and Parts 2, 8, 10,14 and 17, 40R-21832; and (e) authorize the execution of all relevant documentation necessary to effect the dedication and naming, abandoning of easements, stopping-up and closing of those portions of Goldenridge Road as ! ~) ') '.- >., ,J public highway and to effect the conveyances of them to the abutting owners for nominal consideration, subject to any required easements. 2. Director, Planning & Development, Report PO 39-06 Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (Growth Management Study - Phase 3) Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines, Interim Report, June 2006 Revised Work Proqram 1. That Council receive Report PO 39-06 respecting the City's Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan, which includes the Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines, Interim Report, June 2006, prepared by Dillon Consulting Limited, et ai, as set out in Appendix I to Report PO 39-06; 2. That Council receive and endorse the revised Work Plan on the Pickering - FCM Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines, June 13, 2006, adapting the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design - Neighbourhood Developments (LEED-ND) framework to the Pickering planning and development context, as set out in Appendix II to Report PO 39-06; and 3. That Council endorse the following staff actions to: a) continue developing and refining the Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines (SND Guidelines), with the assistance of Dillon Consulting Limited et ai, in accordance with the revised work plan; b) develop the SND Guidelines to apply to all development in Pickering; c) use the SND Guidelines, once adopted, as a foundation for developing the sustainability performance measures required by the Central Pickering Development Plan; d) review municipal planning and development documents, from the Pickering Official Plan to detailed engineering and construction standards, to determine sections requiring modifications to align with and implement the SND Guidelines; e) investigate the potential for district energy production in Pickering, with known operators and local utilities; and f) contact the Canadian Green Building Council, TRCA, and others to collaborate on the development of a Canadian equivalent of LEED- ND; and 4. Forward a copy of this Report to Council to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, ROC Group, Canada Green Building Council, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Director of the North U24 Pickering Land Exchange Team, the Region of Durham and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. 3. Director, Planning & Development, Report PO 40-06 Pickering Harbour Company 1213 & 1224 Sandbar Road (Lots 219-224, Lots 283-288 and Part of Lots 218, 289, Plan 299) City of Pickerinq 1. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 2/06 be approved, as set out in the draft by-law attached as Appendix I to Report PO 40-06, to amend the existing zoning on the subject property to an "OS-PR" Open Space Passive Recreation Zone, to permit a wind turbine and passive recreation uses, on lands being Lots 219-224, Lots 283-288 and Part of Lots 218 and 289, Plan 299, City of Pickering. 2. That the amending zoning by-law to implement Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 2/06, as set out in Appendix I to Report PO 40-06, be forwarded to City Council for enactment. 3. That Council endorse the initiation and coordination by staff of a future zoning by-law amendment application, in conjunction with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and the Pickering Harbour Company, to rezone the remaining lands of the East Spit between the subject property and Liverpool Road (Parts 8 to 16, 40R2022, Parts 1, 2 and 3, RP 40R6366) to an appropriate open space category to implement the Open Space Systems - Natural Areas of the City of Pickering's Official Plan. 4. Chief Administrative Officer, Report CAO 03-06 Partners for Climate Protection Plan City of Pickerinq Greenhouse Gas Reduction Proqram 1. That Council receive Report CAO 03-06, including Attachment 1 entitled "City of Pickering Partners for Climate Protection Local Action Plan" prepared by Greenpath and dated June 2006; 2. That Council adopt the following 10 year greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets as outlined in the Greenpath report: a) 35 percent per capita reduction in community GHG emissions by 2016 (from 1995 community emission levels); and b) 50 percent per capita reduction in municipal operations GHG emissions by 2016 (from 1995 corporate operational emission levels); \¡) !:':' t. i., d 3. That Council approve the Municipal Operations and Community Local Action Plans outlined in Greenpath's report, as a basis and framework for proceeding with the City's GHG reduction program, and authorize staff to: a) implement, as appropriate in 2006, those recommended GHG reduction actions that can be carried out with available staff and resources, and within the approved budget; b) recommend specific GHG reduction actions for Council's consideration in subsequent years, through the annual City budget process; and c) seek funding assistance from FCM and other available sources to assist in further developing, implementing and monitoring the City's GHG reduction program. 4. That Council acknowledge and thank all project sponsors, working group chairs and participants and engaged community partners, and particularly those funding and in-kind sponsors, being the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), Ontario Power Generation, Enbridge, Veridian, the ROC Group, Greenpath, Energy Matters and Durham SustainAbility. 5. That a copy of this report be forwarded to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities; Ontario Power Generation; Enbridge; Veridian; Durham SustainAbility; the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority; the GTA Clean Air Council; Dan McTeague, MP, Pickering-Scarborough East; Mark Holland, MP, Ajax-Pickering; Wayne Arthurs, MPP, Ajax- Pickering-Uxbridge; Roger Anderson, Chair, Region of Durham; and all others interested in the City's GHG reduction program. 5. Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, Report CS 34-06 Adoption of Pay Assurance 1. That Report CS 34-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be received; 2. That the City of Pickering amend its standard Subdivision Agreement to include the Pay Assurance provisions as outlined in Schedule "A" and any other changes as deemed necessary by the City Solicitor and the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer; 3. That the City Clerk advise the Ontario Sewer and Watermain Construction Association and the Ontario Urban Development Institute (UDI) that the City has agreed to include Pay Assurance provisions in the City's Subdivision Agreements; and · ') ,.. l: ~"' t.J 4. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect hereto. 6. Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, Report CS 36-06 2006/2007 Property and Liability Insurance Proqram 1. That Report CS 36-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be received; 2. That the City of Pickering renew effective June 26, 2006, its property, liability and other coverages through the Frank Cowan Company for the period July 1 2006 to July 1, 2007 inclusive on terms and conditions acceptable to the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer; 3. That the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, as part of the Risk Management Program, be authorized to continue the Reimbursable Deductible Program through the Insurance Adjuster and the Frank Cowan Company and further, that the Director be authorized to settle any claims including any adjusting and legal fees within the total deductible limit where it is in the City's interest to do so; 4. That the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be authorized to purchase additional insurance, make changes to deductibles and existing coverages, and alter terms and conditions as becomes desirable or necessary in order to limit potential liability exposure and to protect the assets of the City and it's elected officials and staff; and, 5. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be given authority to give effect thereto. 7. Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, Report CS 38-06 Public Meeting Notice of the Passinq of a Responsible Pet Ownership By-law 1. That Report CS 38-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be received; 2. That a public meeting be held on June 26, 2006 for the purpose of soliciting comments with respect to the proposed Responsible Pet Ownership by-law; and 3. That upon review of the comments, the City Clerk present the by-law at the July 24, 2006 meeting of City Council. · r)''1 U I.. lCiit¡ o~ REPORT TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Report Number: PD 38-06 Date: June 26, 2006 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: Goldenridge Road Extension/Rushton Road Road Dedication and Naming By-law Road Closing and Transfers of Land to Adjacent Owners Abandonment of Easements File: 00206 Recommendation: By-laws should be enacted to: (a) dedicate and name certain parts of lots within Registrar's Compiled Plan 1051, being those parts of Lots 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 117 and 118, designated as Parts 16 to 20, 40R-23842, Parts 1 and 2, 40R-23817, Parts 1 and 2, 40R-22516, Part 6, 40R-21832, Part 9, 40R-21831, Block 29, Plan 40M-2299 as Goldenridge Road and Block 30, Plan 40M-2299 as Rushton Road; (b) stop-up and close certain portions of Goldenridge Road lying within Registrar's Compiled Plan 1051, being those parts of Lots 54 and 117, designated as Parts 10,11,21 and 22, 40R-21831 and Parts 7,9,15 and 16, 40R-21832 as public highway; (c) declare the lands within Registrar's Compiled Plan 1051, being those parts of Lots 54 and 117 designated as Parts 10, 11, 21 and 22, 40R-21831 and Parts 7, 9, 15 and 16, 40R-21832 (portions of Goldenridge Road) surplus to the needs of the Corporation for the purpose of sale to the abutting owners, in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Act and the Acquisition and Disposal of Land Policy subject to any required easements; (d) abandon the easements, in favour of the City, for road maintenance purposes, over those lands lying within Registrar's Compiled Plan 1051, being those parts of Lots 54,116 and 117, designated as Parts 12,13,20 and 23, 40R-21831 and Parts 2,8,10,14 and 17, 40R-21832; and (e) authorize the execution of all relevant documentation necessary to effect the dedication and naming, abandoning of easements, stopping-up and closing of those portions of Goldenridge Road as public highway and to effect the conveyances of them to the abutting owners for nominal consideration, subject to any required easements. Report PO 38-06 Date: June 26, 2006 l'·! ()8 'I-..- , Subject: Goldenridge Road Extension Page 2 Executive Summary: The City has acquired additional lands to allow the completion of another portion of the Goldenridge Road extension and has entered into an Agreement for its construction. Once the construction is complete, the appropriate by-law should be registered to name it and dedicate it as a public highway. Once the construction of this portion of Goldenridge Road is complete, the turning circle located within Plan 40M-2155 and the road maintenance easements taken in favour of the City will no longer be required. Accordingly, a by-law should be enacted to stop-up and close the lands subject of the turning circle, abandon the road maintenance easements and convey same to the abutting owners when the lands subject of the turning circle have been restored to residential capacity. Financial Implications: Advertising, Legal Fees and Disbursements Owner's Cost Registration of Documentation (City's Cost) Approximately $500.00 Background: Goldenridge Road is an internal development road expected to eventually extend from Fairport Road to Dunbarton Road. Currently, the southerly portion extends approximately 42 metres north of Dunbarton Road and the northerly portion of Goldenridge Road was constructed through Plan of Subdivision 40M-2155, leaving the central 160 metres (approximately) to be constructed. The City has acquired an additional 115 metres (approximately) of the lands required to complete the central portion of Goldenridge Road through various land division applications and has entered into a Development Agreement with Grant Morris Associates Ltd. for the construction of this additional section. Once this portion of Goldenridge Road has been constructed, it will require dedication and naming (see Attachment #1 - Road Dedication and Naming Location Map). It should be noted that the residents at 1754 and 1756 Appleview Road (Lots 46 and 47, RCP No. 1051) were not prepared to convey the lands required to complete the extension of Goldenridge Road to the City at this time, therefore the construction of Goldenridge Road will extend to within 45 metres (approximately) from the completed portion at Dunbarton Road. The Agreement between the City and Grant Morris Associates Ltd. also addresses the removal of the turning circle located within Plan 40M-2155. With the extension of Goldenridge Road, the turning circle will no longer be necessary and certain portions of it should be deemed surplus to the needs of the City and conveyed to the adjacent owners and the easements previously taken for road maintenance purposes abandoned. As the turning circle has been dedicated as a public highway, it is necessary to enact a by-law to stop-up and close the portions no longer required as ü :~ ~~ Report PO 38-06 Date: June 26, 2006 Subject: Goldenridge Road Extension Page 3 public highway prior to the City's disposal of them (see Attachment #2 - Stop-up and Close Location Map). Such conveyances will be subject to any required easements. Further, as Rushton Road has now been completed and will connect to this extension of Goldenridge Road, it is also appropriate to lift the 0.3 metre reserve and dedicate Block 30, Plan 40M-2299 as public highway at this time. The appropriate notices have been published in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Act and the City's Notification By-law relating to the stopping-up, closing and naming of these portions of highway and there have been no objections. Staff is seeking enactment of these by-laws at this time as it is anticipated that this extension of Goldenridge Road will be completed during Council's summer recess. The registration of such by-laws will not be effected until such time as the construction inspection has been finalized. By-laws should therefore be enacted to: (a) dedicate and name certain parts of lots within Registrar's Compiled Plan 1051 being those parts of Lots 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 117 and 118, designated as Parts 16 to 20, 40R-23842, Parts 1 and 2, 40R-23817, Parts 1 and 2, 40R-22516, Part 6, Plan 40R-21832, Part 9, Plan 40R-21831, Block 29, Plan 40M-2299 as Goldenridge Road and Block 30, Plan 40M-2299 as Rushton Road; (b) stop-up and close certain portions of Goldenridge Road lying within Registrar's Compiled Plan 1051, being those parts of Lots 54 and 117, designated as Parts 10, 11, 21 and 22, 40R-21831 and Parts 7, 9, 15 and 16, 40R-21832 as public highway; (c) declare the lands within Registrar's Compiled Plan 1051, being those parts of Lots 54 and 117 designated as Parts 10, 11, 21 and 22, 40R-21831 and Parts 7, 9, 15 and 16, 40R-21832 (portions of Goldenridge Road) surplus to the needs of the Corporation for the purpose of sale to the abutting owners, in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Act and the Acquisition and Disposal of Land Policy subject to any required easements; (d) abandon the easements, in favour of the City, for road maintenance purposes, over those lands lying within Registrar's Compiled Plan 1051, being those parts of Lots 54,116 and 117, designated as Parts 12, 13,20 and 23, 40R-21831 and Parts 2, 8, 10, 14 and 17, 40R-21832; and (e) authorize the execution of all relevant documentation necessary to effect the dedication and naming, abandoning of easements, stopping-up and closing of those portions of Goldenridge Road as public highway and to effect the conveyances of them to the abutting owners for nominal consideration, subject to any required easements. Report PD 38-06 Date: June 26, 2006 u30 Subject: Goldenridge Road Extension Page 4 Attachments: 1. Road Dedication and Naming Location Map 2. Stop-up and Close Location Map 3. Draft Road Dedicating and Naming By-law 4. Draft Stop-up and Close By-law Prepared By: Approved I Endorsed By: te~ Denise Bye, Supervisor, Property & Development Services DB:bg Attachments Copy: Chief Administrative Officer City Solicitor Recommended for the consideration of Pickering Ci C iI (:,31 ATTACHMENT' t TO Rfj'ORT 11 PO '~~- O~ \ I \ \ \ I I \ I ~ f \ G) / a r 0 fT1 Z ~\ \ ;0 \ 0 0 « G) \ a fT1 cr: I \ ( ;0 I- a cr: » \ a (0 LANDS T..~DBJ Aqjf9~CA.1 t:u 0.. cr: -.. ~. )-GE ~JA L.. « \ "Gnl r 'RI lL. -, '/ .- RUSHTON ROAD I - ~ - " LOT 47'pRCP 1051 0 1756 A PLEVIEW « ROAD a 0 LOT 46.,flCP 1051 cr: 0 1754 A PLEVIEW ;;; ROAD ~ ~~~ w - I-- ): W ~ -.J - 0.. -\ 0.. « - ~ \ DUNBARTaN ROAD C.N.R. I I I I I ~ ~ City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PART 6, 40R-21832, PART 9, 40R·21831, PARTS 16, 17, 18, 19, & 20, 40R-23842, 1- PARTS 1 & 2 40R-22516 PARTS 1 & 2 40R-23817 AND BLOCKS 29 & 30 PLAN 40M-2299 OWNER CITY OF PICKERING DATE JUNE 6, 2006 DRAWN BY JB FILE No. ROADDED.462 SCALE NTS CHECKED BY DB ëOi~,.:~.,u{cË~~,, "p"i."a Inc. Qnd it. auppli",... All right. Re.erved. Not 0 plan of .urve)'. PN-7 2005 MPAC and it_ lIuppliera. All right. Re..rv.d. Not a plan of Survey. Ü3J ATTACHMErJi # '3 TO REPORT II PD ·3~y-0(., THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING BY-LAW NO. :},,~ ";'< .,';~;'¡: Being a By-law to dedicate and nä ' ., rts of lots within Registrar's Compiled Plan 1051, being those parts of Lots 48, , 53, 54, 117 and 118, designated as Parts 16 to 20, 40R-23842, Parts 1 and 2, R-23817, Parts 1 and 2, 40R-22516, Part 6, 40R-21832, Part 9, 40R-21831, Block 29, Plan 40M-2299 as Goldenridge Road and Block 30, Plan 40M-2299 as Rushton Road. WHEREAS The Corporation of the City of Pickering is the owner of the parts of lots within Registrar's Compiled Plan 1051, set out herein and wishes to dedicate them as public highways; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Municipal Act, the Council of a local municipality may pass by-laws for giving names of highways. NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. Those parts of lots within Registrar's Compiled Plan 1051, being those parts of Lots 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 117 and 118, designated as Parts 16 to 20, 40R-23842, Parts 1 and 2, 40R-23817, Parts 1 and 2, 40R-22516, Part 6, 40R-21832, Part 9, 40R-21831 and Block 29, Plan 40M-2299 are hereby dedicated as public highway (Golden ridge Road) and Block 30, Plan 40M-2299 is hereby dedicated as a public highway (Rushton Road); and 2. Those parts of lots within Registrar's Compiled Plan 1051, being those parts of Lots 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 117 and 118, designated as Parts 16 to 20, 40R-23842, Parts 1 and 2, 40R-23817, Parts 1 and 2, 40R-22516, Part 6, 40R-21832, Part 9, 40R-21831 and Block 29, Plan 40M-2299 are hereby named "Golden ridge Road". BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 26th day of June, 2006. ~r ~. -- Debi A. Bentley, City Clerk Roadded.462 tTTACHMWìff f TO r:C'QR1/1 PO.. ~Ç)-- Ql.2. THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING u34 BY-LAW NO. Being a By-law to stop-up and cl.. as public highway, those parts of Goldenridge Road being Parts j and 22, Plan 40R-21831 and Parts 7, 9, 15 and 16, Plan 40R-21 easements over Parts 15, 16, 21 and 22 for storm drainage purpo íIttí~bandon easements, in favour of the City, for road maintenance pur~ft.~, authorizing the sale of the lands and the conveyance of easements to ttlif abutting owners. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Municipal Act, the Council of the City may pass by-laws to stop-up a highway, or part thereof, and to authorize its sale or the sale of a part thereof; and WHEREAS the appropriate Notice of this By-law has been published in compliance with the provisions of the Municipal Act, the Acquisition and Disposal of Land Policy and Public Notification By-Law 6166/03 relating to the closing of a highway. NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The following portions of highway are hereby stopped-up and closed to both vehicular and pedestrian traffic: . Goldenridge Road being those parts of Lots 54 and 117, RCP 1051, designated as Parts 10,11,21 and 22, Plan 40R-21831 and Parts 7, 9,15 and 16, Plan 40R-21832, reserving easements, in favour of the City, for storm drainage purposes over Parts 15, 16, 21 and 22. 2. That those portions of Goldenridge Road described above are hereby deemed surplus to the needs of the Corporation and shall therefore be offered for sale to the abutting owners, subject to any required easements, for nominal consideration ($2.00). 3. The following portions of lands are no longer required by the City for road maintenance purposes and shall therefore be conveyed to the abutting owners for nominal consideration: . Those parts of Lots 54, 116 and 117, RCP 1051 designated as Parts 12, 13,20 and 23, Plan 40R-21831 and Parts 2, 8,10,14 and 17, Plan 40R-21832. 4. The Mayor, City Clerk and City Solicitor are authorized to obtain all relevant documentation necessary and execute all documentation required to effect the stopping-up and closing of these portions of Goldenridge Road and to abandon the road maintenance easements and to effect the conveyance of them. BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 26th day of June, 2006. ~ David Ryan, ',,> ~ Debi A. Bentley, City Clerk L4500106 REPORT TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Report Number: PO 39-06 Date: June 26, 2006 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (Growth Management Study - Phase 3) _ Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines, Interim Report, June 2006 Revised Work Program Recommendation: 1. That Council RECEIVE Report PO 39-06 respecting the City's Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan, which includes the Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines, Interim Report, June 2006, prepared by Dillon Consulting Limited, et ai, as set out in Appendix I to Report PD 39-06; 2. That Council RECEIVE and ENDORSE the revised Work Plan on the Pickering - FCM Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines, June 13, 2006, adapting the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design - Neighbourhood Developments (LEED-ND) framework to the Pickering planning and development context, as set out in Appendix II to Report PO 39-06; and 3. That Council ENDORSE the following staff actions to: (a) continue developing and refining the Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines (SND Guidelines), with the assistance of Dillon Consulting Limited et ai, in accordance with the revised work plan; (b) develop the SNO Guidelines to apply to all development in Pickering; (c) use the SND Guidelines, once adopted, as a foundation for developing the sustainability performance measures required by the Central Pickering Development Plan; (d) review municipal planning and development documents, from the Pickering Official Plan to detailed engineering and construction standards, to determine sections requiring modifications to align with and implement the SNO Guidelines; (e) investigate the potential for district energy production in Pickering, with known operators and local utilities; and (f) contact the Canadian Green Building Council, TRCA, and others to collaborate on the development of a Canadian equivalent of LEED-ND; and 4. Forward a copy of this Report to Council to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, ROC Group, Canada Green Building Council, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Director of the North Pickering Land Exchange Team, the Region of Durham and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. Report PO 39-06 Date: June 26, 2006 036 Subject: Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (Growth Management Study Phase 3) Page 2 Executive Summary: The Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (SNP) is one of several related initiatives the City has launched about sustainability. The purpose of the SNP is to prepare Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines containing measurable performance targets for assessing neighbourhood development in Pickering. The intent is that all new development will meet, or exceed, a defined minimum level of sustainability. Dillon Consulting Limited, et ai, who is assisting staff on this project, has prepared an Interim Report on Pickering's Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines (see Appendix I). The Report provides an update on the status of the project, including the results of completed steps, the development of a framework for the guidelines, and the steps to complete the project. A revised work program, reflecting the need to move the project to being Pickering-specific rather than generic is also provided (see Appendix II). As work continues, it is important that Council endorse key aspects of the proposed approach, implementation and actions to continue this important work, as set out in the recommendation section of this Report. Financial Implications: No new funding implications as a result of adopting the recommendations of this report. The total budget for the Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (SNP) is $241,000. Half of the funding ($120,500) is from a grant from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) Green Enabling Fund. The City is contributing the remaining half of the funds ($110,000 from Growth Management Study Phase 3, continuing studies reserve, account 2611-2392; and $10,500 from 2005 new consultative expenditure - Growth Management Study Phase 3, Sustainable Development Plan, account 2611-2392). As of the end of April 2006, approximately $105,000 remains for this project. Background: 1.0 PickerinQ is involved in a number of initiatives about sustainabilitv. The Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (SNP) is one of a number of interconnected initiatives and actions the City has undertaken respecting sustainability. Others include: the City's Benchmarking for Sustainability Committee; the Partners in Climate Protection (PCP) project; Council's comments on the Central Pickering Development Plan requesting the inclusion of sustainability measures; and a similar request for the inclusion of an integrated set of sustainability measures in Seaton in the Report of the Seaton Community Net Benefits Committee. u3 ';' Report PO 39-06 Date: June 26, 2006 Subject: Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (Growth Management Study Phase 3) Page 3 Reports on Benchmarking and PCP initiatives are also being prepared for Council's consideration. The approved Provincial Central Pickering Development Plan requires that the City prepare performance measures and benchmarks for specified development attributes. The intent is that the benchmarks will play a role in monitoring the success of the Plan in achieving sustainability. 2.0 The Sustainable Neiahbourhood Plan 2.1 This project originated with the Growth Management Study. In February 2003, Council retained Dillon Consulting Limited, et ai, to complete the City's Growth Management Study (GMS). Phase 3 of that Study was the preparation of detailed Neighbourhood Plans and Design Guidelines for the first phase of development. The Guidelines were to provide strategies for development that defined the creation of quality communities as well as allowing for market flexibility in Central Pickering. In 2004 the City, with the assistance of a local environmental consulting company, ROC Group, made a grant application to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) under the Green Municipal Enabling Fund. A revised work program for Phase 3 of the City's GMS was put forward as one of the projects for funding. Phase 3 was refocused to require completion of a Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (SNP). Sustainability principles, guidelines and strategies to be developed for Central Pickering were to serve as a template for other future neighbourhood planning throughout Pickering. A significant part of the work program was modeling the benefits of implementing sustainable development. Following notice that its grant application was successful, City Council, in February 2005, confirmed the continued use of Dillon Consulting Limited to undertake the SNP (GMS, Phase 3), as set out in the work program. 2.2 A Revised Work Plan (June 2006) has been submitted for endorsement. As work progressed on the SNP over the last year, it became apparent that the stakeholders were very aware of the importance of planning and developing in a sustainable manner. Staff identified the need to refocus the SNP from demonstrating the merits of sustainable development for a generic neighbourhood ("why we should do it") to defining specifically what sustainable neighbourhood development means for Pickering ("what we should do"). The revised purpose of the SNP is to prepare guidelines for assessing neighbourhood development in Pickering, with the overall goal of ensuring all new development meets, or exceeds, a defined minimum level of sustainability. The revised work plan is provided for Council's endorsement as Appendix II. It is also recommended that the Report be forwarded to FCM for information. Report PO 39-06 Date: June 26, 2006 038 Subject: Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (Growth Management Study Phase 3) Page 4 2.3 An Interim Report on the SNP has been submitted for information. An Interim Report has been prepared, entitled Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines, Interim Report, June 2006 (see Appendix I). This Report is being forwarded to Council for information. The main sections of the Report address the following: · Introduction: including project background, rationale for sustainability, and consultation - Stakeholder Workshop #1 · Literature and Best Practices Review: examining 10 case studies of the best practices in sustainable community development; · Neiqhbourhood Desiqn Guidelines: presenting the purpose, identifying and testing the LEED-ND (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design - Neighbourhood Developments) framework - Stakeholder Workshop #2, other consultation meetings, and providing sample strategies and targets; · Implementation: committing to identify the proposed implementation approach for each strategy; and · Next Steps: completing the draft optional strategies and targets, critical review by City staff of required and optional strategies and targets, conducting focus group meetings and a public meeting, and preparing the Final Report. Extracts from the LEED-ND Draft Guidelines, a Summary of Workshop #2, as well as work in progress on Pickering strategies and targets are attached to the Interim Report for reference. The LEED-ND framework is being adapted to create a Pickering specific approach. The LEED-ND framework establishes measurable targets for both prerequisite and optional strategies to achieve a point-based sustainability rating. Additional points are obtained by including more optional strategies and by meeting higher targets. Projects can then be rated as certified, silver, gold or platinum. A Figure is provided on Attachment #1 to conceptually illustrate the combination of required and optional measures to achieve different rating levels. 2.4 Several key steps remain to be completed. A staff team has been formed and is currently reviewing the working drafts of the required strategies and the targets for Pickering. Once completed, staff will also review working drafts of the optional strategies and targets. Subsequently, public and stakeholder consultation will occur. Implementation approaches will be considered as an integral part of the refinement of the strategies and targets. A Final Report containing the proposed Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines will be prepared and forwarded to Council in October. (} 3 :~eport PO 39-06 Date: June 26, 2006 Subject: Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (Growth Management Study Phase 3) Page 5 3.0 Discussion 3.1 A critical review of draft "required" guidelines is underway by staff. Staff is currently reviewing the draft "required" guidelines and performance measures. We are strongly convinced of the merits of defining the sustainability attributes for Pickering. However, critical review of the draft guidelines is still required by staff prior to going forward with stakeholder consultation. Outstanding issues to be addressed through Departmental review include: · Eliminating overlapping/similar strategies; · Confirming/revising draft strategies and targets; · Clarifying language; · Including Pickering specific examples; · Incorporating the concept of community evolution into guidelines; · Considering reorganizing to match strategies with different parts of the planning and development review processes (e.g.: separating the strategies and targets that would be used in evaluating an official plan amendment application from those used for a draft plan of subdivision from those used for a zoning by-law amendment or site plan application or building permit application or engineering submission, etc.); · Establishing, if necessary, different strategies and targets for infill development, greenfield development in South Pickering, greenfield development in Seaton, and rural development; · Considering the need to differentiate between the private realm and the public realm, or between the different service providers that contribute to a neighbourhood (such as private sector, City, Region, school boards, and Provincial Ministries). 3.2 Council is requested to endorse a number of key actions to continue this important work. Staff supports and continues to recommend adapting the draft LEED-ND framework. As noted earlier, this framework identifies required strategies and targets, as well as a range of optional strategies and targets that different developers and builders can select from, to achieve a defined sustainability level. The framework was tested during the day-long Workshop #2 with a wide range of stakeholders. A consensus was reached to move forward with the LEED-ND framework. Report PO 39-06 Date: June 26, 2006 (:40 Subject: Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (Growth Management Study Phase 3) Page 6 Staff recommends the Guidelines apply to all new development in Pickering. However, in developing and refining the strategies and targets, consideration needs to be given to whether development in different locations (infill, greenfield, or rural), require different strategies or targets. On a related matter, staff recommends the Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines, once adopted, form the basis for developing the sustainability benchmarks required for Seaton under the Central Pickering Development Plan. The large area of Seaton likely offers some unique opportunities for sustainability, including such matters as a district energy supply. Staff recommends discussions be initiated with known district energy operators and utility providers regarding the potential for district energy. Dillon, on behalf of the City, has contacted the Canada Green Building Council (the organization that administers the LEED programs in Canada) regarding the City's SNP forming the basis for the Canadian version of LEED-ND. The Council was interested in this potential. Staff supports this concept, and recommends a meeting be set, including other partners such as the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, to collaborate on the development of a Canadian equivalent of LEED-ND. Staff recognizes that this project is much more that just a set of guidelines - it is a new way of undertaking the planning and development of the City. The SNP Guidelines and their overall objective of achieving sustainable communities must be integrated corporately in the City's plans, policies, standards, and processes. Accordingly, staff recommends that a review of all plans to determine where changes are required to implement the SNP Guidelines, and report back to Council. Part of the implementation policies will address the establishment of an appropriate monitoring program. This review of plans, policies and standards will be in the context of the existing legislative framework, as well as the emerging legislative changes that are anticipated with the approval of Bill 51 (Planning Act changes). Policies recommended will be forwarded to fit the legislative framework, as well as Council's leadership in this area. Many of the attributes important to sustainable neighbourhoods are delivered by agencies and governments other than the City. The role of staff will change to include significant effort in coordinating the delivery of these other services and facilities at the appropriate time. A collaborative approach is important to build success for sustainability with agencies, other levels of governments and the development industry. Pilot projects, and tests of certain targets may be essential to showcase improvements and monitor successes (or identify unanticipated effects). Report PD 39-06 Date: June 26, 2006 041 Subject: Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (Growth Management Study Phase 3) Page 7 APPENDICES: Appendix I: City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan: Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines, Interim Report, June 2006. Appendix II: Pickering FCM Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines, Revised Work Plan, June 13, 2006. Attachment: 1. Figure 1: Illustration of Framework Combining Prerequisite and Optional Performance Measures to Achieve Different Sustainability Ratings. Prepared By: Approved I Endorsed By: ~M~ .;(/J / / tr--- Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Manager, Policy Neil Carro IP, RPP Director, Planning & Development CR:jf Attachments Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Division Head, Corporate Projects & Policy Benchmarking for Sustainability Committee Recommended for the consideration of Pickering Ci Co ~. II ;/ 04.2 APPENDIX I TO REPORT PD 39-06 City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines Interim Report, June 2006 --'4') L ..1 ("i!lf "I ~ A-~ :¡ " '\.. ~. . 1sJ¡~._I{tId... ~--u.:- PICKERING Sustainable ..Jft Neighbourhood -y~ Design Guidelines Interim Report June 2006 City of Pickering Sustainable Neigllbourhood Plan SNP Interim Report - June 2006 Citlf<J1 ! ~ C44 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................·.···..·······.·····..··..···· 1 1.1 Project Background............................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Rationale for Sustainability ........................................................................1 1.2 Format of Report................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Study Process.............................. ......................................................................... 5 1.4 Consultation......................................................................................···....··..··..··..· 5 2.0 LITERATURE AND BEST PRACTICES REViEW........................................................... 6 3.0 NEIGH BOU RHOOD DESIGN GU IDELlNES ......................................... ...........................8 3.1 Purpose of the Guidelines ........ ........ .......... .............................................. ........ ..... 8 3.2 Development of the Guidelines ............................................................................. 8 3.2.1 LEED-ND (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design - Neighbourhood Developments)....................... ..........................................8 3.2.2 Stakeholder Input into the Development of the Guidelines from Workshop #2 ............................................................................................. 9 3.2.3 Target Setting.......................................................................................... 10 3.3 Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines.................................. 13 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUiDELINES................................................................... 13 4.1 Proposed Implementation Framework................................................................ 13 4.1.1 Required Guidelines and Performance Measures................................... 13 4.1.2 Enhanced Strategies and Targets - Point System ..................................15 5.0 NEXT STEPS.................................................................................................................. 16 Table 1.1 Table 3.1 Table 3.2 Figure 1.1 Figure 1.2 Figure 1.3 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C LIST OF TABLES Differences between Conventional and Sustainable Design................................. 3 Examples of Targets and Proposed Implementation for Required Strategies .... 12 Examples of Targets and Proposed Implementation for Optional Strategies...... 14 LIST OF FIGURES The Balance of Environment, Society and Economics in a Sustainable Commu nity ............................................................................................................ 2 Components of Sustainable Communities ............................................................2 Process for Developing Sustainable Neighbourhood Development Guidelines.... 5 LIST OF APPENDICES Best Practices Report Extracts from the LEED-ND Document Summary of Stakeholder Input Dillon Consulting Limited Page i C4:S City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan SNP Interim Report-June 2006 l".,,~..( ~~.... f¡.,t,·_I"""",L..,.;.~ PICKERING 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background In 2005, the City of Pickering commenced the Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (SNP) Project with the assistance of the Green Municipal Enabling Fund. The City and its partners recognized the need to provide a solid foundation for future development and to provide the leadership, guidance and support required to make Pickering a sustainable city. This SNP project is being run in parallel with the Partners for Climate Protection (PCP) program and is a part of the Sustainable Pickering initiative. Other sustainability initiatives in Pickering include establishing benchmarking standards for sustainability and Sustainable Downtown. The City is committed to balancing economic, social and environmental objectives to achieve a desirable and sustainable community. Through the SNP, sustainability principles and strategies with measurable criteria will be developed as the basis for Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines for future development in Pickering. The objectives of the SNP are to: 1. Identify a new approach to development; 2. Establish a practical set of guidelines for sustainable community design that will be applied throughout Pickering; and 3. Work collaboratively with municipal staff, developers, residents, energy providers, businesses and others to create a far reaching, innovative guideline. The SNP incorporates an integrated approach to community design To develop the Guidelines, sustainable design measures will be assessed to reduce environmental impact, and to achieve socially and economically viable neighbourhood designs with respect to transportation choices, energy supply, building envelope design, HVAC (Heating, Ventilating, and Air-Conditioning), stormwater management, naturalized landscaping, solid waste management, site design, street patterns, arrangement of lots, blocks and uses, and community evolution. 1.1.1 Rationale for Sustainability What are sustainable communities? Sustainable communities reduce the impact of the built form on the environment while ensuring the long-term economic durability and social cohesion of the community. In other words, economic, social and environmental needs are balanced in the community (Figure 1.1). Dillon Consulting Limited Page 1 C:4il City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan SNP Interim Report - June 2006 l;::~!,~~.:~ PICKERING Environrnental Eflicicnt Use III' Energy & Resources Storm water Infiltration Reduced Potable Water Use lIalnlal Restoration U¡"·j',il." ..1' lIonsinL: I ~I)l' and _....1('11111'<· Tfalls lorta j, jj Efticicncy USt' "I' Encn.!Y Development Figure 1.1 The Balance of Environment, Society and Economics in a Sustainable Community Although there are many components to a sustainable community they can generally be divided into 3 categories: community design, natural environment protection and building design and construction. Note that with respect to community design, the word 'community' is used as a broad term that encompasses a range of scales from neighbourhood to site. Examples of components of sustainable communities are displayed in Figure 1.2. "\, , , ~ t ¡ :, Ii Jj I : I , I . : r, -! ' ! . I ~ ~ , ' '~1<;;~ 1'1 !H'~·"· 1'1. ,.1', ,",\n 1111¡"'~'d ,,!,,':1 ,p.h' ~\,·,·1 ¡· ,I '·"·I:I~"I'''n'' ,'II" :,,' ') I',','r, (".~ ,.; h~'¡ II:. o,f.. ~ ,\ ',,';;lI!·:,'1:11\\1'.: ,1, '_"If¡ \\t','! ,I::. (~'n! .lp!'I:;!'h.--, I'~k:l'" ~·:::;~~·al·!PJ'1:.1th,~ / ¡\b':JHLhP~· lh.lh_. '.¡,'!h_ j·,.ll'hll;nl";>\<' '.\ tr,~ 'I1,J>!', ! -, ,t: ','1,-,n .'11,':". 'L 1P;"'" ¡ ~1.'~~~·. ,tL.:,':I~ 1:llp:,,\ ,'" i:hl,','II" ',11, I p'.1 1'1'-,,' '11.111' ,,:, ,\; h-~"I-:!u' t ,'ih;';.,. :I"'j ,\, ,í.:;!lI":<".';1 1~.'..~d,::.I1.d ,n,~ , " ~. I :~I",..· h. h,', :,",tf¡"Ij,t! ;Uh[ \!1I!íllh'I,I.I¡ ...,':' I.','.. ! I-In <,,1.1'1),':1:\ ," ¡h'I~"II'''I;1 IH."d.. ""'1 if' " ." .-IIV""! :;1" III',·...~)::, \In:-I)/<' 1\-,1,,; ;¡n ,\. "j,',', ( I'n\ ,:1" 1d ,i"II, 'n .,:; "...,.j,') I',.I! 1>L" ,1-tl~". 1,',,"\\':"1,- P:t":!,I)1I ),,( "''II, ,":II1I1.-:,I..I·...,,, ¡·¡,,, Figure 1.2 Components of Sustainable Communities Dillon Consulting Limited Page 2 Ü4? City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan SNP Interim Report - June 2006 \ "J,t ..~ ,-:\.... fw,J_,-'-.t-..i·:....... PICKERING Why are sustainable communities important? Canadian urban and suburban jurisdictions are being increasingly confronted by deteriorating conditions due to a wide range of factors related to environmental, social and economic issues. Some of these issues include: increased automobile dependency and increased traffic congestion (which affects the economy, society and the environment); sprawling communities result in higher infrastructure costs; fewer walkable neighbourhoods; contaminated air, water and soil; and pressure on energy and other non-renewable resources. Conventional design guidelines for new developments tend not to include performance targets related to environmental issues, such as air quality and water and energy use. To respond to these deteriorating conditions sustainable communities can provide the following components: · Safe and liveable neighbourhoods; · Healthier living environments; Compact connected mixed use community structure; · Local employment opportunities; · Support for a high level of community interaction; · Support for socially inclusive and diverse communities; · Reduced costs for heating and cooling; · Reduced costs for maintaining infrastructure; · Reduced greenhouse gas emissions and ground level ozone; · Improved natural hydrologic cycle; · Reduced potable water use; and · Reduced waste generation. Some examples of how sustainable community design differs from conventional design are presented in Table 1.1. Urban Desi n · Looped/disconnected street systems · Discourages walking and cycling · Segregated uses · Less flexible for future intensification · Connected street system · Design for walking and cycling Connected residential areas with shopping and neighbourhood amenities · Accommodate future intensification along major routes Stormwater Minimal infiltration . Storm sewer system Constructed wetlands Increased infiltration · Permeable pavers · Green roof · Exfiltration trenches · Rains out disconnection Dillon Consulting Limited Page 3 City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan SNP Interim Report - June 2006 (~ 48 l""~"( ~~. ......_.....L-....... PICKERING Buildin Desi n · Building orientation maximizes frontage · Ontario Building Code & Model National Energy Code for Buildings minimum requirements · The following are voluntary: · Energy star appliances · High efficiency furnaces, heat pumps and water heaters · Smart Meters Water Efficienc · No restrictions on water use · Some monetary incentives · Water efficient fixtures & appliances (low flow showerheads and toilets, front loading washers) 1.2 Format of Report · Building orientation considers passive and active solar opportu n ities · Increased insulation, fenestration (windows) and ventilation performance · The following could be mandatory instead of voluntary: · Energy Star Standards · Energy Star appliances · High efficiency furnaces, heat pumps and water heaters · Encourage green energy sources · Encoura e district ener · Further requirements for efficient fixtures & appliances (dual flush toilets, composting toilets) · Recycled rainwater for irrigation · Naturalized landscaping Restrict use of potable water for irrigation purposes · Commercial buildings: waterless urinals This report is presented in five main sections. Section 1, the introduction, provides an overview of the context, purpose and process of the SNP project as well as general background information on sustainable communities. The second section provides a summary of a literature and best practices review that was conducted to obtain examples of elements of existing or planned sustainable communities. Section 3 provides a summary of the development of Pickering-specific Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines. The fourth section summarizes the proposed process to implement the Guidelines and Section 5 provides an overview of the next steps in the development of the sustainable neighbourhood plan. Dillon Consulting Limited Page 4 1>4j City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan SNP Interim Report-June 2006 l',,,,,..~ ~~ f..;...'# .... L- ~.:..... PJèkÉRING 1.3 Study Process A general overview of the study process is shown in Figure 1.3. The development of the Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines for Pickering was initiated by establishing the objectives of the project. Background information on sustainable neighbourhoods was then collected. A best practices report, describing case studies on sustainable community design, was prepared from this review of the literature. A list of objectives and strategies for sustainable neighbourhoods was then created and the framework for the development guidelines was created. Next, Pickering-specific targets for sustainability were developed and the process for implementation of the Guidelines was identified. .,¡ ~ j-,/ 1. j ¡ ddi ! Iii plcn 1('1) i:\1 ¡ UI ì" -Best practices reVIew -Raise awareness on benefits of sustainable design -Develop "made for Pickering" guidelines -Set targets for required and optional strategies -Identify tools for implementation I Llckgroll lid R eSe'a rc i 1: -Identify and meet with stakeholders - Develop list of measures Figure 1.3 Process for Developing Sustainable Neighbourhood Development Guidelines 1.4 Consultation The study process included public and stakeholder consultation. Two workshops with invited stakeholders were held, as well as an open house for the public at the Pickering Town Centre. In addition, technical team meetings are planned to review and discuss proposed targets for the Guidelines. The first workshop was held in June 2005. The purpose of this workshop was to introduce the project to stakeholders and to obtain their feedback on key issues. Workshop #2 was held in March 2006 to obtain feedback on the proposed framework for the Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines. The purpose for and results from Workshop #2 are discussed in more detail in Section 3.2.2. The open house was held in May 2006 to introduce the project to the general public. This open house was held in conjunction with other components of the Sustainable Pickering program, including the Partners for Climate Protection project. Dillon Consulting Limited Page 5 1)30 City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan SNP Interim Report - June 2006 l'. ,:..~ ~+, fo,......__........~......... PICKERING 2.0 LITERATURE AND BEST PRACTICES REVIEW The process for determining appropriate design measures for Pickering began with a review of best practices in the GT A, as well as cutting edge 'green' development activities in municipalities across Canada. A Best Practices Overview report was prepared that provided a description of ten innovative projects undertaken by municipalities and developers to implement sustainability goals. This report is attached in Appendix A and the following is an overview of the report. The projects described in the report reflect the best current, leading edge initiatives as identified by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) and the Dillon Consulting project team. The report provides an overview of seven municipalities currently implementing or developing innovative guidelines for their communities to encourage development that reduces environmental impact. In addition, three case studies on innovative builders and developers that are voluntarily incorporating green development measures in new developments are included. The requirement for green performance measures and environmental guidelines is a fairly recent trend in Canadian planning policies. In western Canada, Calgary and Vancouver have adopted green building guidelines. In July 2004 Vancouver adopted LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Gold as its standard for all new city buildings (the first municipality in Canada to do so). Calgary requires that new public buildings in excess of 500m2 attain LEED Silver certification. In central and eastern Canada, municipalities have yet to adopt green development standards, although several guidelines have been developed for specific areas, generally through the adoption of Secondary Plans. In some areas, developers and/or builders are voluntarily working with municipalities and environmental agencies to explore ways of incorporating green development measures. The ten projects described in the Best Practices Overview include: · Sustainable City Project, Vaughan; · Sherwood Survey Secondary Plan, Eco-Tech Village, Milton; · North Oakville Secondary Plan, Oakville; · Plan of Subdivision, Stickwood Walker Property, Town of Newmarket; · Drake Landing Solar Community, Okotoks; · Southeast False Creek, Vancouver; East Clayton, Vancouver; · Marshall Homes, Copperfield, Oshawa; · Jeffrey Homes, The Birches, Whitby; and · Windmill Developments, Dockside Green, Victoria. The following is a summary of some of the sustainable community elements from three of these projects. The first two examples are included because they represent large scale comprehensive projects with a variety of approaches to sustainability. The third Dillon Consulting Limited Page 6 ",51 City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan SNP Interim Report - June 2006 t',I'I',' ~ 1~2i<tRr~C example, although a smaller scale development, is included because it is a local example from Durham Region. Dockside Green. Victoria BC --I J. '-'~"~'-~' 7 " '. r / ._. ..f \ .: ¡ : l,../ff:: ci _'1 1 . ' C,.· , , ,¡!"I /:>;, · Biomass energy cogeneration (woodwaste-to-energy utility plant) is proposed. · Geothermal heat pumps will be installed for commercial buildings for cooling. · Solar water heating will be used. · On-site grey and blackwater treatment has been proposed so that all sewage will be treated on site. · A privately owned commercial enterprise will use waste by-products from the community to generate energy. · There will be a car share program including neighbourhood electric vehicles as well as priority parking for alternative vehicles. Regent Park Revitalization Plan, Toronto, ON · Water saving fixtures and appliances and grey water recycling for communal laundry facilities will be installed. · Green roofs, porous pavement, exfiltration trenches will be used. · There will be a 'green bin' program for townhouses, and a waste reduction program for small commercial establishments. · Recommendations were made for adoption of a specialized 3R demolition process; on-site brick/concrete crushing, asphalt, metals and wood recycling; comprehensive waste audit; and pre- approved waste haulers. · Reduced parking facilities, minimized pavement widths and provision of bike parking were proposed. · Conservation of existing natural areas/trees, "no spray" policy, preference for low maintenance and native species/landscaping as well as increased permeable surface areas, shade and tree coverage were included in the design. · A high efficiency district energy supply and enhanced thermal envelopes for buildings were also proposed. Marshall Homes, Copperfield, Oshawa, ON Dillon Consulting Limited Page 7 City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan SNP Interim Report - June 2006 l·"'''(''(~..... fw,,~....-.......L¡'·~""" PICKERING u52 Buyers can opt for an 'energy saving' package consisting of a combination of the following: · High efficiency dual burner furnace with variable speed fan · Heat recovery ventilators · Windows with low E coating on inside · Increased insulation, house wrapped in Tyvek or Typar · Kid friendly streets with community facilities in-place · Energuide blow test and rating Additional features include: · Solar panels to heat hot water · Houses prepped for future conversion to solar or wind electricity 3.0 NEIGHBOURHOOD DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.1 Purpose of the Guidelines ...:fu., As mentioned in the previous sections, the main product from the SNP project will be Pickering-specific Guidelines for sustainable community development. These Guidelines will provide specific performance measures to create sustainable neighbourhoods. The Guidelines include sustainable strategies and targets related to community design, environmental preservation, as well as building design and construction. As noted in Section 11.1. the word 'community' is used as a broad term that encompasses a range of scales from neighbourhood to site. 3.2 Development of the Guidelines At this time, the Guidelines are in the process of being prepared. The Guidelines will include Pickering-specific strategies and targets developed from background research and case studies as well as stakeholder input. The process being used to develop the Guidelines is described in the following sections. 3.2.1 LEED-ND (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design - Neighbourhood Developments) The framework for developing the Guidelines was created using LEED-ND (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Neighbourhood Developments) as a model. The LEED system, which is administered by the Canada Green Building Council in Canada, has previously been applied to green building design and multi-unit residential Dillon Consulting Limited Page 8 C5 :"1 City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan SNP Interim Report-June 2006 l',·,¡··t ~_. /v,"_,.......l-..m....... PICKERING buildings and is based on accumulating points for a prescribed list of criteria. The rating system is divided into 'Credits' and 'Prerequisites', and typically consists of a few prerequisites and many credits. To be certified a project must meet all the prerequisites as well as a certain number of credits, which are optional but contribute to the total points. A certain point total is required for LEED certification and higher point scores are required for silver, gold and platinum certification. The LEED-ND rating system is an emerging program being tested in the USA to develop a set of standards for neighbourhood location and design based on the principles of smart growth, urbanism and green building. LEED-ND is aimed at improving land-use patterns, neighbourhood design and technology and is based on four categories: Location Efficiency; Environmental Preservation; Compact, Complete & Connected Neighbourhoods; and Resource Efficiency. Representative extracts from the draft USA LEED-ND document are attached in Appendix B. LEED-ND provides a good starting point for developing Pickering-specific Guidelines. Nonetheless, because the LEED-ND document was prepared for the US and is a draft document, the program needs to be significantly modified for Pickering. In addition, some strategies that were encountered during the literature review that should be considered for Pickering were not included in the LEED-ND document. To develop the Pickering-specific Guidelines, a full complement of strategies and targets were compiled into tables. These tables were used to present the information to and obtain feedback from stakeholders at a workshop (Workshop #2). 3.2.2 Stakeholder Input into the Development of the Guidelines from Workshop #2 A workshop (Workshop #2) was held on March 3, 2006 to discuss the development of the Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines with various stakeholders. Workshop attendees included representatives from various City departments, the Region, utilities, and the TRCA, as well as architects, planners, local interest groups, developers and builders. The objective of the workshop was to review and obtain stakeholder feedback on adapting the LEED-ND model to create Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines for Pickering. The workshop included brief presentations to introduce the LEED-ND program and to review the objectives and strategies of the program. Workshop attendees were provided with workbooks in which the objectives, strategies and example requirements for the four LEED-ND categories were presented. There were 3 breakout sessions at the workshop in which the participants commented on the strategies and example requirements and provided feedback on whether or not the proposed strategies should be required or optional in the SNP Guidelines for Pickering. The tables providing a summary of the stakeholder input from the workshop are provided in Appendix C. Dillon Consulting Limited Page 9 U54 City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan SNP Interim Report - June 2006 ~.·' 'I'·~ ~~ fw..~-"";'I....r.L-¡-":"" PICKERING The overall consensus from the stakeholders on whether or not a strategy should be required or optional in Pickering's Guidelines was incorporated into the development of the Guidelines. Results from the workshop show that consensus was achieved for 79 of the 1 03 strategies presented at the workshop. Of these 79, 20 were proposed as optional strategies and 59 as required. By contrast, in the LEED-ND program only 10 strategies are required, 5 of which are in the Environmental Preservation category. In general, most workshop participants were comfortable with the wording of the strategies. However, it was noted that the stakeholders thought that some of the LEED- ND strategies were far behind what is already done in the Greater Toronto Area today. This is especially true for the LEED-ND Environmental Preservation section. In addition, the stakeholders were most interested in what the final targets for the strategies would be, as the specifics of target setting and implementation could have the most affect on their particular interests. As only brief discussions were held with the stakeholders at the workshop regarding specific targets, it was determined that technical teams composed of experts would need to be created to review proposed targets for Pickering. The purpose of these technical teams is described in the target setting summary in the next section. 3.2.3 Target Setting The input received from stakeholders at Workshop #2 was used as part of the target setting process. Target setting was divided into two stages: the first stage was to set targets for the strategies categorized as required and the second to set targets for optional strategies. To date, a draft set of targets has been developed for the required strategies only. . Although target setting was divided into two stages, the process will be the same for each stage. For each strategy, the first part of target setting involves reviewing the LEED-ND target and comparing it with information gathered from case studies of projects with sustainable community elements. Example programs are reviewed to determine best practices for existing communities that have been successful in implementing sustainable strategies. The targets from these existing developments\buildings are then compared to the proposed LEED-ND targets and a proposed target for Pickering is developed based on this assessment. The next part of the process is to submit the proposed targets to City staff for critical review. A revised draft will be prepared based on the comments received. The third part of the targeting setting process is to present the proposed targets to teams of technical experts to determine if the proposed targets are appropriate for Pickering. This work has yet to be undertaken. Five teams will be established, each to focus on one of the following categories of strategies: Dillon Consulting Limited Page 10 '.,5;"", City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan SNP Interim Report - June 2006 l'JJr:"~ ~~. ÂJ,,_.....Lr':..a. PICKERING 1) Community Design; 2) Buildings (Residential and Commercial); 3) Natural Environment; 4) Transportation; and 5) Utilities. As noted above, proposed targets have been created for required strategies based on case study research. These proposed targets have been submitted to City staff for review. Representative examples of the proposed targets are presented in Table 3.1 Meetings have been held with some technical stakeholders (utilities and TRCA) but in depth technical team I staff meetings have not yet been held to discuss proposed targets for community design, buildings and transportation. Meetings with the utilities were held with Bell Canada, Veridian and Enbridge to discuss their existing sustainability initiatives as well their potential involvement in the development of Guidelines and the creation of sustainable neighbourhoods in Pickering. All utilities expressed interest in the project and would prefer to be involved in the process early on. They would also like to review the draft Guidelines. Some the sustainable community initiatives suggested were home office package deals by Bell, smart and net metering by Veridian, and demand management techniques with customers by Veridian and Enbridge. Further discussions will be held with Enbridge regarding the possibility of district energy, as they have experience with this in Markham. A meeting was also held with TRCA to discuss the project. TRCA provided some suggestions regarding the overall process and will provide specific input on targets related to environmental preservation (including natural heritage, stormwater management, and water balance) at a later date. Strategies discussed at the meeting included: · Incorporating the net gain principle into the target setting process; · Developing separate guidelines for brownfields, greenfields and employment lands as well as for different stages of design; · Phasing the introduction of sustainable community elements starting with strategies for City owned properties, then for land that the City sells for development and finally, involving the development industry in a pilot study. Dillon Consulting Limited Page 11 "'5 (~ ,.: n City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan SNP Interim Report - June 2006 """"I~ fw-."-:,-,=L.~ PICKERING Table 3.1. Examples of Targets and Proposed Implementation for Required Strategies Proposed Target For Proposed Strategy Pickering Implementation Supporting Case Study Summary Approach Compact and Limit average block - Parent OP A Average numbers are not available. Connected perimeter within the - Secondary Plan However, in each community checked, larger Neighbourhoods: project from between (Policies and Land Use block perimeters comprised a small Design Block 245 m to 550 m. The Schedule) percentage of the overall block pattern. The Perimeter to perimeter of each block - Tertiary/Block Plans majority of block perimeters range between promote includes the properties 350 and 550 m. Therefore, average connectivity bounded by the sidewalk calculations would probably achieve the or the equivalent provision target. for walking and does not include the sidewalks North Oakville l'ìOMI Plan - Oakville, themselves. Ontario · Block Perimeter Range: 300-600 m LEED awards points rÒr (measured at right-of-way). shorter average block · Average perimeter would achieve target. perimeters: Queensville Community - East · 473m to 549 m = I Gwillimbury, Ontario point · Block Perimeter Range: 360-622 m. · 396m to 473 m = 2 · Average perimeter would achieve target. points · 320 m to 396 m = 3 Community of Weston Highlands- points Vaughan, Ontario · 244 m to 320 m = 4 · Block Perimeter Range: 290-750 m. points. · Average perimeter would probably achieve target. Cornell- Markham, Ontario · Block Perimeter Range: 280-690 m. A verage perimeter would achieve target. Compact and In commercial and mixed - Site Plan Approval Issaquah Highlands - Washington Connected use 50% or more of total Conditions Ratio of total retail to total office GF A: 14%. Neighbourhoods: number of office buildings - Based upon urban Maximize include ground floor retail design guidelines Commons of Uptown Waterloo - pedestrian safety AND business on the Waterloo, Ontario and comfort ground floor are Ratio of at-grade retail to ot1ìce in building: accessible from sidewalk 30% (3-storey building). along a public space. AND/OR place trees or Old Hyde Park Village Centre - Tampa, other structures to provide Florida shade over at least half of 50% ratio: 60,000 sf(5,575 sm) second the length of sidewalk. storey ot1ìce over at-grade retail. Improve quantification of Urban Design Guidelines, Queensbury, NY target: Trees planted every 20 ft (6 m) in 5 ft (1.5 m) Change # of office wide strip between sidewalk and street curb. buildings to amount of at- grade retail required for a Pedestrian and Transit-Friendly Design commercial, main street (Smart Growth Network) area. · Provide minimum height-to-width (i.e. e.g. 50% of ground floor between building faces) ratio of I :3 or 90% of ground floor (to accommodate for entrances and lobbies to UDDer floors). Dillon Consulting Limited Page 12 < ~- i "~ ( City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan SNP Interim Report - June 2006 l,·d'I··¡ ~.... A...'_.....I..t-.-:i.':' PICKERING As mentioned above, the technical team! focus group meetings for the communities, buildings and transportation technical teams have not yet been created. These teams will include individuals with proven experience in the specified field as well as staff from the City and Region. The community design and buildings teams will each meet twice to review the list proposed targets for required strategies related to their expertise. The transportation team will meet only once to discuss existing policies and target setting. After the technical team meetings have been conducted, the proposed targets for the required strategies will be finalized. If Phase One is successful, the same process (case study research followed by technical team meetings) will occur to set targets for the optional strategies. Although not yet complete, examples of proposed targets for optional strategies are shown in Table 3.2. 3.3 Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines Pickering-specific Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines will be prepared using the strategies and targets for required and optional items. The Guideline will be prepared as a stand-alone document and will be similar to the LEED-ND format, with the detailed target for each strategy described. Where appropriate, illustrations including maps and figures will be used to describe the visible and "invisible" sustainability features described in some of the strategies and targets (i.e. including the "visible" urban design, and the "invisible" building envelope and infrastructure characteristics). 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINES Where applicable, the suggested approach to implementation of the strategies and targets has been identified. A general approach that will be required to implement the Guidelines has been proposed but a detailed implementation plan has not yet been prepared, pending completion of the Guidelines. Examples of proposed implementation measures have been provided for required and optional strategies and are displayed in Tables 3.1 and 3.2. The following provides an overview of the tools that the City can use to implement the Guidelines. 4.1 Proposed Implementation Framework 4.1.1 Required Guidelines and Performance Measures The Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines will be implemented through a number of planning policy instruments with overall guidance and governance provided Dillon Consulting Limited Page 13 City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan SNP Interim Report-June 2006 Ü58 l"!"I"~ ~~þ, /w,'_I.....L....·::···... PICKERING Table 3.2. Examples of Targets and Proposed Implementation for Optional Strategies Strategy Compact and Connected Neighbourhood s: Promote a main street model that promotes pedestrian comfort reducing internal vehicle trips Resources Efficiency: Increase the use of on-site renewable energy sources Proposed Target For Pickering Locate highest density development and non-auto oriented retail / service facilities, along internal collector roads rather than boundary arterial roads. On-site parking requirements to be significantly reduced. On- street parking and/or cash-in- lieu parking to bc included in parking requirements. Parking maximums to be established (both parking rates, and size of individual lots ). Commercial/service facilities located along lower speed roadway with maximum 4 or 5- lane cross-section for ease of pedestrian crossing betwecn stores. Provide a continuous street front with main entrances fronting on thc sidewalk. Ratio of building height to distance across the street bctwcen building frontages should be a minimum of 1 :3. All houses to include optional upgrade for solar thermal Domestic Hot Water (DHW) or solar electric (minimum sizes to be determined). - Proposed Implementation Approach Parent OP Policies Zoning By-law amendment to Parking Standards Parking By-Law regarding Cash-in- Licu (Currently used in some municipalities) Urban Design Standards Supporting Case Study Summary Wortley Village, London, Ontario Daily neighbourhood commercial facilities (grocery store, drug storc, etc.) located in smaller-scalc structurcs with limited parking, along collector road at centre ofneighbourhood rather than along higher-speed multilane arterial at cdge of ncighbourhood Beach neighbourhood, Toronto, Ontario Small-scalc retail, restaurant and service tàcilities provide a continuous streetfront directly along the right-of-way line. Narrow street cross-section (4 lanes), on-street parking, short blocks, and streetcar activity reduces vehicle spccds and allows for easy mid-block pedestrian crossings. PROJECTS: Sterling Homes, Drakes Landing, Alberta - laneways are oriented so that garage roofs are optimal for an active solar system. Marshall Homes, Ont. - otTers solar hot water, ground sourcc heat pump systems, and rough in for solar electric, all as optional upgrades. Daniels, Ont. - clients are requesting active solar upgradcs. POLICY: London, U.K. - All new non-residential developments above a threshold of 1,000 m2 shall providc renewable energy production to provide at least 10% of predicted requirements. Dillon Consulting Limited - - - Points awarded resulting in savings to Builder in Frecs or Processing Time for Building Permit Page 14 I' 5 :.~ City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan SNP Interim Report - June 2006 l·'.,,(,.(~o.& A..,~__,"'{..J.......;,¡-'''''''' PICKERING by an Official Plan Amendment. This amendment will define the purpose, goals and key attributes of sustainable neighbourhood design and direct that sustainability policies be implemented through secondary plans, zoning by-laws and City Municipal Standards. The specific required strategies and targets for Pickering will be listed in the OPA. Existing Secondary Plans that are not built out will be brought into conformance with the OPA as will the Zoning By-Law. City Municipal Standards will also be amended to implement the Guidelines. 4.1.2 Enhanced Strategies and Targets - Point System The inclusion of additional strategies and targets in development approvals are important to enhance the sustainability of neighbourhood designs beyond that achieved by the required elements. A wide range of optional strategies will be identified in the Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines Project. The intention is to allow some flexibility for developers to choose among these strategies and combine them in a manner that meets the skills, market and comfort of the developer and yet achieves a significant level of environmental, social and economic benefit. These additional enhancement strategies and targets will be implemented through a point system that allocates points to each successful strategy and allows developers to choose among a range of optional strategies/targets to accumulate the desired number of points. The strategies/targets and allocated points will be developed by the City through the Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines project. The application of these can be implemented through one of two approaches: 1. Official Plan Amendment The OPA referenced above will also refer to the optional strategies and targets and direct that a certain number of points must be achieved in secondary plans and development applications. The OPA will list the optional strategies, targets and point system. OR 2. Council Policy Council will adopt a Special Policy that optional strategies and targets will be met through the point system in all secondary plans and development applications. Ideally, some value to developers will be attached to success such as a development charge credit, an application fee reduction or reduced processing time. Dillon Consulting Limited Page 15 ,. G!) City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan SNP Interim Report - June 2006 l"",..,~ A.r/~¡"":L~ PICKERING 5.0 NEXT STEPS As discussed in the sections above, there are many steps in the development of the Guidelines that must be completed before Pickering can implement the Guidelines. Some of these steps can be completed within the existing work plan, however others are beyond the scope of the SNP work funded partially by FCM. The items that can be completed within the existing work plan include: · Proposed targets and implementation strategies will be updated after City staff review. · Conducting technical team meetings to finalize targets for required strategies; · Conducting case study research to set targets for optional strategies; · Conducting technical team meetings to finalize targets for optional strategies; and · Preparing a list of funding sources for additional work. The following items will also need to be completed but are beyond the scope of the existing work plan: · Testing of the Guidelines should be conducted (e.g. a pilot project for an area such as Duffins Heights); · Conducting a feasibility study for district energy in new areas of greenfield development; · Preparing the detailed implementation strategy including preparation of an OPA and updating by-laws and City Standards; and · Preparing a draft Guidelines document Dillon Consulting Limited Page 16 t: 61 APPENDIX A Best Practices Report ';8 "" City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan Best Practices Overview November 2005 05-4689 Submitted by Dillon Consulting Limited I' ~:) \: V,¡ City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan Best Practices Overview , ';'" ..( <1\.. "'" f..¡¡,~-,__.L....;.~':".!" PICKERING 1.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 3.0 Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan Best Practices Overview Table of Contents Page OVERVIEW....................................................................................................................... .1 BEST PRACTICES REVIEW.... ................ ......... .............. ............. ............ ........ ............ .....1 Sustainable City Proj ect, Vaughan................................................................................· 3 Sherwood Survey Secondary Plan, Eco- Tech Village, Milton....................................... 4 North Oakville Secondary Plan, Oakville..... ............... ......... ............. ............................. 5 Plan of Subdivision, Stickwood Walker Property, Town of Newmarket....................... 6 Drake Landing Solar Community, Okotoks ................................................................... 7 Southeast False Creek, Vancouver....... ........ ..... ...... ........ .............. .............. ....... ............ 9 East Clayton, Vancouver...............................................................................·..·..........· 10 Marshall Homes, Copperfield, Oshawa ............................. ............ .................... ........... 11 Jeffrey Homes, The Birches, Whitby.................. .............. ................ ............. ............... 12 Windmill Developments, Dockside Green, Victoria .................................................... 13 NEXT STEPS. ...... ..... ...................................... ...... ...... ..... .............. .................. ......... ........14 M:\PROJECTS\DRAFTl05\054689 - SNP\Concept Dcsign\Best Practiccs Report.doc Pagei Dillon Consulting Limited , 6 ... I} <:t City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan Best Practices Overview l',:,{.,: ~..... fw,~·__~""".l-.1Ò '..!, PICKERING 1.0 OVERVIEW The City of Pickering has initiated the Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (SNP) for Pickering. Through the SNP, sustainability principles and strategies with measurable criteria will be developed as the basis for Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines for future development in Pickering. The draft Guidelines will also be applied to a conceptual development area to illustrate and test them. Consultation will take place throughout the process to obtain feedback and innovative ideas. The SNP is to be carried out in conjunction with the Partners for Climate Protection project. The SNP will incorporate an integrated approach to community design with a focus on reducing the environmental impact of the built environment. Sustainable design measures will be assessed to reduce environmental impact and achieve economically viable neighbourhood designs with respect to transportation, energy supply, building envelope design, HV AC (Heating, Ventilating, and Air-Conditioning), stormwater management, naturalized landscaping, solid waste management and site design. The outcome of the study will be a set of universally applicable guidelines. The process for determining appropriate design measures began with a review of best practices in the GT A, as well as cutting edge 'green' development activities in municipalities across Canada. This document provides a description of ten innovative projects undertaken by municipalities and developers to implement sustainability goals. The projects reflect the best current, leading edge initiatives as identified by CMHC, FMC and Dillon Consulting Limited staff. The case studies provide an overview of seven municipalities currently implementing or developing innovative guidelines for their communities to encourage development that reduces environmental impact. Three case studies on innovative builders and developers that are voluntarily incorporating green development measures in new developments are also included. The Best Practices Overview will serve as a resource for City staff and stakeholders, providing information on key aspects of each of the case studies, as well as contact information. To develop objectives and strategies for the Guidelines, the LEED-ND (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Neighbourhood Developments) Rating System will be used as a model. 2.0 BEST PRACTICES OVERVIEW Canadian urban and suburban jurisdictions are being increasingly confronted by deteriorating environmental conditions due to a wide range of tàctors, such as increased automobile dependency, contaminated air, water and soil, and pressure on energy and other non-renewable resources. Conventional design guidelines for new developments have tended not to include performance targets related to environmental issues, such as air quality and water and energy use. It would appear, however, that a new trend is emerging whereby municipalities are either requiring 'green' performance measures for all new development, or are incorporating environmental guidelines and/or performance requirements in planning policies, such as secondary plans, plans of subdivision, urban design guidelines, and zoning by laws. In Canada, this is a fairly recent trend. In western Canada, Calgary and Vancouver have adopted green building guidelines. I In central and eastern Canada, no municipality has yet to adopt green development I In July 2004 Vancouver adopted LEED Gold as its standard for all new city buildings (the first municipality in Canada to do so). Calgary requires that new public buildings in excess of 500m2 attain LEED Silver certification. PWGSC has committed to achieving LEED Gold/BREEAM Four Leaves or equivalent standard for all new PWGSC buildings by 2005. Dillon Consulting Limited Page 1 L6:) City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan Best Practices Review "...lJ¡.,( ~..... Â.t,A_~......I.-'/~.!" PICKERING standards, although several guidelines have been developed for specific areas, generaUy through the adoption of Secondary Plans. In other cases, developers and/or builders are voluntarily working with municipalities and environmental agencies to explore ways of incorporating green development measures. Green development measures tend to address aspects of site design that faU into the foUowing categories: · Site selection; · Green building design (building envelope, orientation, indoor air quality & HV AC&R (Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning, and Refrigeration infrastructure); · Energy (on or offsite renewable energy); · Solid waste management; · Water & wastewater; · Stormwater management; and, · Transportation. Green development guidelines are meant to provide design guidelines, or, in some cases, performance targets, that, when implemented, result in a reduced environmental impact as a result of the built environment. The Best Practices Overview provides an overview of some of the most progressive sustainable planning activities underway in the Canada. Case studies were selected based on (1) the degree of innovation, either with respect to the process or the environmental design measures being incorporated, and (2) comparability to the context of the Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan in Pickering. AU of the case studies selected provide information that wiII be useful in attempting to develop a sustainable neighbourhood plan as weU as green development standards and/or guidelines. In addition, three case studies are provided on innovative builders and developers that are voluntarily incorporating green development measures in new developments. Each case study provides a brief description, highlights design features and environmental benefits, and provides information on the policy and/or implementation strategy (for municipalities) or marketing strategy (for builders/developers). Contact information is also provided. The ten projects covered are: · Sustainable City Project, Vaughan · Sherwood Survey Secondary Plan, Eco- Tech Village, Milton · North Oakville Secondary Plan, Oakville · Plan of Subdivision, Stickwood Walker Property, Town of New market · Drake Landing Solar Community, Okotoks · Southeast PaIse Creek, Vancouver · East Clayton, Vancouver · Marshall Homes, Copperfield, Oshawa · Jeffrey Homes, The Birches, Whitby · Windmill Developments, Dockside Green, Victoria Dillon Consulting Limited Page 2 '6" t! I) City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plall Best Practices Review "...11,.·1 ~ fwf__~:L-~'''~ prCKERlNG Green Municipalities 2.1 Sustainable City Project, Vaughan2 Or anization: Toronto Re ion Conservation Authorit (TRCA) Descri tion: · A "Living City" initiative to explore barriers to applying "green design" to community development · Project to include 400 homes, two schools, and a mix of other uses such as commercial, transportation, and a greenspace network. · A roximatel 100 ha ofa 400 ha block (block 39 in Vau han Desi n Features: · Design will incorporate best practices in community design and building construction, such as LEED platinum (see below). · Note that the design will only apply to a portion of Block 39, as 70% of the block has already been developed or proposed for development. In addition, much of the planning for the block has alread been deteffi1ined in terms of trans ortation lans and schools. Environmental Benefits: · Significantly reduced environmental impact. · Specific initiatives addressed at the workshop as options included geo-thennal exchange, solar ener , and reen build in desi n standards (LEED, BuiltGreen). Strate : · The TRCA has a number of organizations and corporations taking part including the CMHC, the City of Vaughan, local developers, builders, utility companies, and the district school board. In August 2005, a workshop was held to discuss a local action plan to increase the adoption of best practices in green community design and green housing construction. · The action plan will accomplish this by identifYing best practices, benchmarking the current state of best practices in community design and housing construction, identifying barriers to and levers for promoting market penetration of best practices, creating an implementation Ian and ublishin and romotin the results on the TRCA's web a e. Contact Info: Andrew Bowerbank, TRCA Phone #: 41666 I 6600 x5343 E-mail address: ~\bj)~y(.:!j~Jnk[~~trç~Lon.c;1 Pro'ect website: \V\Vw.trca.()n.ca/livin~ cit\ 2 The Living City, Supporting Residential Community Development, TRCA, 2005 Dillon Consulting Limited Page 3 ,~ "'i I: b ¡ City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan Best Practices Review {...I".:( ~... /i.Þ,~_"""".I--.".~'~ PICKERING 2.2 Sherwood Survey Secondary Plan, Eco- Tech Village, Milton3 Participants: Town of Milton, Federation of Canadian Municipalities - Green Municipal Funds, Smart Growth Secretariat, Province of Ontario, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Regional Municipality of Halton, Bell Canada, Mattamy Development Corporation, Milton Hydro Distribution, Ozz Corporation, Rogers Cable and Union Gas Limited. Description: · The Town of Milton initiated the Eco-Tech Village design project in 2001 based on an increasing interest in ecological design in the community and a need to respond to rapid future growth. · For the purposes of a design charette held in the spring of 2002, a theoretical 20 Ha area was selected that contains a secondary mixed-use node (10 Ha), a residential neighbourhood (10 Ha), a stormwater management pond and a village square · The site is owned by Mattamy, one of the Dartners in the design exercise Desi2n Features: · Three different designs were developed at the design charette. The preferred design was selected as a pilot project to be developed by Mattamy (see web site) · Design is based on 7 principles: environmental sustainability, ecological sensitivity, energy efficiency, financial accountability, economic viability & marketability, technical advancement, smart growth Environmental Benefits: · The plan promotes sustainable development, technological advancements and fiscal resDonsibility and municipal governance. Plannin2 Process & Implementation Tools: · The Sherwood Park Secondary Plan (which includes the area owned by Mattamy) provides environmental guidelines for an Eco Tech Village · An upcoming Official Plan Review will result in updated references to Sustainable Development Guidelines and the Eco Industrial Park · Process involved all members of development industry to ensure success of the project. · Several reports (Sustainable Development Guidelines, Planning Indicators and Monitoring Program) are available on the Town of Milton website. · As of September 2005, building permits had been issued to Mattamy for model homes and construction was reported to have bellun. Contact Info: Bill Mann, Manager of Planning Policy Town of Milton, \VW~2'.Dlilton"--ç(1 Phone #: 905-878-7252 ext 2304 E-mail address: planniní!((/imillon.ça One of the plans from the design charette I ' " , (f.:' t...'~!¡,',,6...~,~rl~~~¿~\~:4' Liß'~:. /, \\ ., ", s:.:,hr;, ,.;t , , ~ I' OJ! " i'·"""'-:'" ,."..,1.... . ~ f ~(1< .' ,~. I:H': ;~. /... ~~ \ ~ " "'.;.,¡....~,,.\'., i, t -. ':, ~:,..., ;. , v t. f.t.',;,j~ " ..~~k¡'\" ," ,;'-!,,~ø~ J; Z\:~··k:s... .....~ . l.l:¿.", ,,- :' è:l;;;:''I~~~'¡s;".....þI!¡¡';.- i:.l1;£;",. ~.~ ;;J' lL(,?;..~'r¡". ;'f" '"" V " :: : . ë', ,t .,,~.. " . ~ ~I! __ . .1f~~~ ' Lllf:lr¿~' :r· ~ ",:J::.::" ','.:!i:" ,," ""', /ui;¡" ... '". ~t '. qt' ~.,.., .. ,. '" ~ ~ .. . >,..' ,I.. ·~···ùaI DL . '" 3 Town of Milton, \~\\\V.Jl!iLt()I1:Sjl and Town of Milton Eco- Tech Village Pilot Project Urban Design Charrette: Making Choices Towards Sustainability, CMHC, 2003. Dillon Consulting Limited Page 4 ':60 .," 0 City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan Best Practices Review t;II/.'(. ~.... A.,..~._~...... L-.i: :.,!" PICKERING 2.3 North Oakville Secondary Plan, Oakville4 Or anization: Town of Oakville Descri tion: · 3,000 hectares north of Dundas · Greenfield development · 55,000 residential units, 35,000 'obs Desi n Features: · Plan emphasizes New Urbanism type design: mixed use, compact, pedestrian friendly environments, residential and employment areas are developed around 5 and 10 minute walking radii (called 'pedestrian sheds') · Plans to incorporate eco-industrial park with connections to existing Zenon Environmental building · Strong commitment to high-density corridors along major streets (Trafalgar) · Andres Duany led design workshop. Proposed design focuses on neighbourhoods with their own centres, all houses accessible to ublic transit. Environmental Benefits: · Reduction in solid waste generation · Reduced consumption ofland and other non-renewable resources (water & energy) · 1m roved air ualit Strate · The Secondary Plan includes a section outlining the sustainable development strategy providing guidelines with respect to the bui]t form, energy, solid waste, etc. Performance measures, particularly for green buildings, will be incorporated as zoning by-law requirements. · Council has not yet adopted North Oakville Secondary Plan. Issues Report and 1m lementation Stud have et to be com leted for council's consideration. Contact Info: Ron Thun City of Oakville Planning Department (905) 845-6601 ext. 3029 rthun(ivoak villc'l:<l ,', :; ., ., - Town of Oakvllo .. .. I "I - c:J = c:::J ., - " D' D = 0'" D' o , . o œ" D c:J ," ,'. ~~ .. ,. , .... ¡(·j·dl, ~'" ....:01<' rk, ¡,'.IJkl. '.;,'IfIJ ,", "'\)1. t Lot'l.! ,....v " ~II ';·11 o~ 4 ~~\'_\~~ Dillon Consulting Limited Page 5 6') \. >1 City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan Best Practices Review '- ';"1 ": t1\...... A,.~..._~...... ",L-,¡"~ PICKERING 2.4 Plan of Subdivision, Stickwood Walker Property, Town of New market Developer / Participants: Menkes Homes Inc. Description: · 90 acre property owned by the Town of New market · Council approved a draft plan of subdivision for a major recreation complex, 160 single family detached dwellings and a 50-unit apartment building. · Within the subdivision, Council has approved a 34 unit single family sustainable housing development on Mulock Drive (referred to as the Stickwood Walker Property) · Menkes Homes Inc. purchased the 23.58 acre property and will develop the lots according to the green building requirements agreed to · Project will act as a demo pilot project for green building practices Design Features: · Exact design details not yet available · Design will endeavour to maximize solar gain & cross ventilating, control summer cooling through building design and on-site landscaping with native plant material, minimize impervious surfaces, reduce carbon emissions, achieve optimal levels of envelope air tightness, and make use of recycled or natural building materials · Design may also incorporate renewable energy and on-site composting Environmental Benefits: · 25% reduction in household water draws compared to conventional homes · 60% reduction in overall discharge flow compared to conventional homes · 60% reduction in solid waste compared to conventional homes · 60% reduction in energy use compared to conventional homes · 60% reduction in greenhouse gases Stratet!v: · Town of New market developed clear green building requirements in Tenns of Reference for draft plan of subdivision and used a competitive bidding process to select the best design. · A voluntary lot levy of$I,OOO per lot will be given to the Town in order to assist with the construction of a trail on lands adjacent to the subdivision. Menkes has offered to pay this levy. In return, the Town will complete an external trail system prior to first occupancy. Contact Info: Dennis Ramsarran, Councilor, Town of New market (905) 868-8364 Representative of New market Environmental Advisory Committee Richard Nethery, Director of Planning Town of New market (905) 953-5321 Dillon Consulting Limited Page 6 City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan Best Practices Review ,'i/'I"( 1\. fv~;"'--d:LJ:;'" PICKERING U ?() 2.5 Drake Landing Solar Community, Okotoks5 Developer / Participants: · C\ N!Vl LT Energy Technology ('enl1\:. \'atlln¡\ Resources Canada · Town or Okotuks - municipal authority · Uniled Coml11unities - developer · Sterling Ilol11es I ,Id, - home and garage builder · !\TC() Gas - utility operator · l'nerWorks Inc. - solar collector and solar domestic hot water system supplier · \'u-i\ir Ventilation Systems Inc. - air-handler units supplier · Science Applil'alion International <urponilion (SAIC Canada) - project coordinator · L.nermodal Lngin~'Cring Ud, - solar and heating system design · Sunbow Consulting Ltd. - subdivision design · Hurst Construction Management Inc. - energv centre building and system construction Description: · Okotoks, Alberta (population 12,000), located 40 km south of Calgary, typical satellite community, 40- 45% of population works in Calgary · In 1998, after experiencing growth rates exceeding five percent since 1985, the Town adopted a resolution to pursue a sustainable approach to development. Okotoks is the first community in Canada to limit their growth based on the available water supply. · Drake Landing is a result of this initiative: a subdivision of 52 solar heated homes Desie:n Features: · Community is heated by a district system designed to store solar energy underground during the summer and distribute the energy to each home for space heating needs during the winter. This is the first design of its kind in the world. It will take approximately 4 years to have the system 'charged', during which time heating requirements will be provided by Atco Gas. Once the borehole system is operational, Atco Gas will continue to provide back-up natural gas heating. A not-for-profit partnership has been established between the developer, builder, utility service provider and the municipality to oversee the implementation of the geothermal solar heat storage system. · Okotoks will be the largest subdivision of R-2000 single family homes in Canada · Okotoks purchases 60% of its electricity from renewable energy sources (Okotoks is part of a consortium of Albertan municipalities that purchase electricity wholesale. Okotoks is the #1 municipal purchaser of renewable energy in Canada. · Sewage treatment plant will use a "vessel composting" system, first of its kind in Canada (closed vessel compo sting - resulting Class A compost will be used as landfill cover material) Environmental Benefits: · Solar energy will be used to meet 90% of residential space heating needs, significantly reducing dependency on fossil fuels. · A reduction of 5 tonnes of greenhouse gases per household, or 260 tonnes per year for the community. · Each R-2000 homes will be 30% more efficient than a conventionally built home. 5 Drake Landing is an exceptional example of grassroots sustainable community planning. Beginning in the late 1990's, the Town ofOkotoks created a Legacy Plan, which outlines the community's commitment to growth within the limits of the natural carrying capacity of Sheep River. The community set water use and sewage treatment guidelines and identified growth boundaries. Drake Landing is one of the outcomes of the community's commitment to progressive, innovative community development. As a result, the Town ofOkotoks has received numerous awards (FCM, Alberta) and has been nominated for a UN Liveable Communities award. For more info: "I' , ' . and Drake Landing: \V\\\y,~II"L"~'CI/ÎI1,Lè\, ¡Jlll Page 7 Dillon Consulting Limited 1.71 City of Pickering Sustainable NeighbourllOod Plall Best Practices Review "¡",,.,( ~.ot.I. A..-...II._~"'.I-...-. ',.... PICKERING Strate . Homeowners charged a favourable long-term fixed monthly fee. Although not competitive with the cost of to day's fossil fuels, costs are less than more expensive electric heating. Operating costs are lower than those of a combustion furnace. . As of September 2005, show homes are almost completed and ready for viewing. Contact Info: Doug McClenahan Manager, Active Solar R&D Natural Resources Canada (613) 996-6078 dmcclena@nrcan.gc.ca Richard Quail Municipal Manager Town of Okotoks (403) 938-8908 rquail@okotoks.ca Dillon Consulting Limited Page 8 City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan Best Practices Review ,'""..( ...;. ..' '..'\-.... A.",,_~........ L--..i....~ PICKERING '. ~7 '.'. ~ I - -~ _ ~ ( , . -' ".... 2.6 Southeast False Creek, V ancouver6 Develo ers/Pro onent: Cit of Vancouver owns a Descri tion: In 1991 , Vancouver City Council adopted a motion to develop Southeast False Creek (SEFC) as a model sustainable community that "incorporates principles of energy efficient design in its area plan". The SEFC site is approximately 80 acres (36 hectares) offormer industrial land near downtown Vancouver. Of this, 50 acres are ublicl owned with the remainder rivatel owned. Desi n Features: · Perfonnance targets have been developed for solid waste, transportation, energy, air emission, soil, water and open space. · Private! develo ed buildin s re uire LEED silver, civic buildin s must achieve LEED old. Environmental Benefits: · Water and energy reductions, solid waste generation reduction, increased impervious area resulting in increased stonnwater infiltration, improved air quality · 12% of roduce consumed b residents to be rown on-site (urban a riculture) Strate · All new civic buildings must achieve LEED Gold (City policy since 2004) · A policy statement outlines the City's commitment to sustainable development, including directions on how to achieve this with respect to land use, built fonn, transportation and circulation, environment and economic development. · Four background documents (water & wastewater, transportation, urban agriculture and energy options) further explore opportunities and best practices for the site and identify implementation tools. The background documents and policy statement led to the development of an Official Development Plan (ODP) (enacted July 2005). · Section 2.2 of the ODP identities sustainability principles and incorporates sustainability indicators and targets, as well as stewardship and monitory policies. · Developers have responded to an EOI (Expression ofInterest) for the Olympic Village, which will be located on public lands in Southeast False Creek. The EOI outlined the City's desire to have buildings achieve at least Silver LEED (preferably Gold), with a 30/30/30 split of affordable/modest/market housin . As of Se t. 2005, the Cit was reviewin submissions. Contact Info: Southeast False Creek Public Lands Kyra Lubell 604-871-6863 Southeast False Creek Private Lands Kirsten Robinson 604.871.6562 . , ~ lJI· .. . ,r:~;"¡ · ~LJ"":":;;:;" ;;r- --- -'f."./}" '~¡..~ ... ~-, . ,I 1tj··~;"""''''· 'Jl'" ¡ !'o~ ~ ~~''':' '1Fš.1 ~~,." -j ¡/I <, ...-:s......; ','.: _ ._ ~ ~:.::.- ¡'f:.(!J / .~~ , .; '. ..... ?'! "'"'. .,p: , ,~.!(¡ If11 ít':;·~';:.1' I'" .~~t;$\.¡'" t4ñ.~"''''. _ ',' }11 .. ~ ," -·I~.Jf¡l-~.:·'----~ 'f' .;/ '1\,\ {ó),...,.. .........n__,~.. ___Jt ". '.... ........... ,.:f'I.-.-oc ,.~~ '...... 'Ii ,r\~î""""'W'''''\--'''r,;'~'-'' j ¡-·..·..·ì ,'¡,~:~';:;r"):~'·'" ~ )~. ...A)~ ~r-:..~:~·A ·'·-it' l=:i-h l;''__. ¿ - ~:; J ,,' »\\.,".....................1............ ..........._ L..._.. ,,' ~~, ..\0 ," _._._ u_'" __ -.. ,;'J.«...~,\)o~ ~_ _................. ............ .............. ....... ..... .... ; ì, .:r //;-;':::'11 .'", " ';'}.'f;'\. .......""..,.,,.' ..::..... '.... /' .~t·~<:~1;:.:0·· , 6 httP;'vancouvcJ:,ca;c()llllllsvcs\ou}hcast¡ Dillon Consulting Limited Page 9 ", '7 () l.: ., City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan Best Practices Review \."0':~ ~..... A.J'~_~ood...l.-..""~ PICKERING 2.7 East Clayton, Vancouver7 Develo ers/Pro onents City of Surrey, the Pacific Resource Centre, and UBC's James Taylor Chair in Landscape & Livable Environments. An advisory committee included area residents, members of the development community, and various interested agencies, including the Real Estate Foundation ofBC, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Environment Canada, CMHC, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, Agriculture Canada, the Ministries of Municipal Affairs and Agriculture, & the GVRD. Descri tion: · The East Clayton area represents a 500-acre greenfield site in Surrey B.C. · The East Clayton Neighbourhood Concept Plan was officially adopted by Surrey Council in April 2002. Construction of Clayton Village, the area's first development, began in 2002. The 3 I-acre project represents a variety of housing options, including 142 single family residential homes on different sized lots, 72 town homes and 23 detached strata homes. · Desi n Features: · Walkable neighbourhoods including 5 minute walking distance to transit and shops. · Interconnected street system, narrower streets with trees · Some car storage and services handled at the rear of the dwellings (in a lane) · Higher densities, different dwelling types in the same neighbourhood and on the same street · New small lot zones with provision for secondary suites and coach houses · 'Special residential' zoning which promotes live/work environments · Mixed use: Employment areas, shopping areas and varied residential in the same community · 'Natural' drainage systems (swales in boulevards) promotes infiltration of surface water · On-site detention of stormwater through retention of topsoil, exfiltration pits and exfiltration swale s stems Environmental Benefits: · Sound storm water management, reduced vehicle trips, environmental preservation, energy savill s Strate · Use charrette approach to involve stakeholders at the outset. · Involve the development industry. · Educate homebuyers · Share the risk with develo ers and munici alit . Contact Info: City of Surrey Bhargav Parghi (604) 591-4394 7 City of Surrey, BC l"-"V}"J.~itv.StllIty,hç,ca Dillon Consulting Limited Page 10 City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan Best Practices Review ""'1"( ~ ñ¿iifuNc C!74 Green Builders 2.8 Marshall Homes, Copperfield, Oshawa8 Develo er: Marshall Homes Descri tion: · 88 detached traditional homes · Greenfield develo ment Desi n Features: Buyers can opt for an 'energy saving' package consisting of a combination of the following: · High efficiency dual burner tùrnace with variable speed fan · Heat recovery ventilators · Windows with low E coating on inside · Increased insulation, house wrapped in Tyvek or Typar · Kid friendly streets with community facilities in-place · Energuide blow test and rating Additional features include: · Solar panels to heat hot water · Houses re ed for future conversion to solar or wind electricit Environmental Benefits: · Reduction of 4 tonnes of GHGs per house (compared to conventional design) · Currently assessing the potential for ground heat storage (for solar heating) and geothermal heatin and coolin Marketin Strate · Upfront marginal capital costs $7,500 - $9,500 (depends on type and size of house) · Payback period less than 10 years, 10% annual Return on Investment (approximately), annual savings of $800 - $1,300 for energy bills · 75% of houses are opting to buy the package of energy saving measures (up from 15% initiall ) - does not include solar anels Contact Info: Craig Marshall Phone #: 905-509-8278 .... :t. ~ <I:> .... ,ð..........."" 8 Marshall Homes 11}J:ll'.c.ljJl'Q.!f.!!}~'I1I~li!('" Dillon Consulting Limited Page 11 '7 W'. L ,.. City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan Best Practices Review I..";t'",( ~.. fw/-Jrd.l-;.;ji '~'~ PICKERING 2.9 Jeffrey Homes, The Birches, Whitby Develo er: Jeffe Homes, Whitb , Ontario Descri tion: · Contains first Energy Star house to be completed in GTA (second in Canada) · 102 bungalow and two-storey detached homes ? · 41 and 45-foot lots (1,523 - 2,890 fn · Greenfield development Desi n Features: · Ultra high efficiency furnace with continuous fan · House wrapped to block wind and water penetration · Features included that are beyond Energy Star requirements · High-efficiency hot water heater, humidistat which adjust the home's temperature and humidity, compact fluorescent light bulbs, dual flush toilets Environmental Benefits: · Houses are 42-45% more energy efficient than those built to Ontario Building Code standards · Water reduction as a result of water efficient appliances and fixtures Marketin Strate · Buyers can opt for Energy Star packages worth $6,700 to $8,700 as part of a $10,000 free upgrades offer or a less expensive ".I-Star" package · Buyers can expect to save $500 - $1,200 per year · Houses priced at $329,000 to $355,000 Contact Info: Contact: Sharon Calton-Jeffery Phone #: (905) 433-4701 www.it: IJerVllOI1lCS.ÇQD.I :3 ,',...."..'..,10 .~"'I·-.:. rœ::¡::;) ~¡ ",. " , Dillon Consulting Limited Page 12 City of Pickerillg Sustaillable Neighbourhood Plall Best Practices Review t;'I/.-( ~d f..,..:'I_ ~""III 1-,"_ '..~ PICKERING :,,76 2.10 Windmill Developments, Dockside Green, Victoria9 rises Ltd. · Desi n Features: · Dockside Green to operate as a "closed loop system" · Biomass energy cogeneration (woodwaste-to-energy utility plant) · Geothermal heat pumps for commercial building (cooling) · Solar water heating · On-site grey and blackwater treatment (all sewage will be treated on site) · Wise Energy Co-op biodiesel facility (a privately owned commercial enterprise will use waste by-products to generate energy) · Car share/ Nei hbourhood Electric Vehicles/ Priorit Environmental Benefits: · Greenhouse gas neutral (no net emissions ofGHG from the development) · No potable water use in irrigation for both public and private developments · Potable water reduction in buildings · Promotes alternative modes of transportation · 95% construction waste diversion goal · On-site com ostin Strate : · VanCity uses a triple-bottom line approach · Partnerships with City of Victoria · Funding from FCM Contact Info: Windmill Development Group Ltd. Joe Van Belleghem phone: 250-592-6769 .h)Ç@~~iD..ÜI1]iUiLc~~IQ12!lJS¿!ll~ .l,'IHll \\ \\ \V ,\vc irIdrn ìI Ick:v(,; 10 nl_cUts, ç()n1 VanCity Enterprises Ltd. Jacques Khouri, President & CEO phone: 604-877-7546 9 ""~V~,-dIJC k~idL·gXº-~IJ_.¡:,'1 Dillon Consulting Limited Page 13 City of Pickering Sustainable Neighbourlwod Plan Best Practices Review í....."'..( ~..... fW:·'_.......iIIL-~ ..... PICKERING f'7 '1 t} , 3.0 NEXT STEPS We have identified a list of additional case studies that Pickering may wish to review, time permitting. Another possibility is to see ifUOIT students could further expand on the Best Practices Overview. Additional projects include the following: · Maple Ridge, BC · Squamish, BC · Banff Green Building Guidelines · Regina Affordable Housing Project · Region of Waterloo, Light Rail Transit Corridor · Calgary 100 Year Sustainable Plan · Niagara Development Standards · Iqualuit, Blueberry Hill · Regent Park, Toronto, ON Dillon Consulting Limited Page 14 APPENDIX B Extracts from the LEED-ND Document /'7 'ì L' ,) ~. . '7 ~"') Q . LE E D.-ND LEED for Neighborhood Developments Rating System - Preliminary Draft September 6, 2005 Presented by the partnership of the Congress for the New Urbanism. the Natural Resources Defense Council and the U,S, Green Building Council . ~ NRDC "\'..¡".: / ,,-.\ : 'Ö ¡ f DRAFT ONLY 9/6/05 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction p.3 II. Point Overview p.9-10 III. Location Efficiency p.ll Prerequisite: Transportation Efficiency Prerequisite: Water and Stonnwater Infrastructure Efficiency Credit: Contaminated Brownfields Redevelopment Credit: High Cost Contaminated Brownfields Redevelopment Credit: Adjacent, Infill or Previously Developed Sites Credit: Reduced Automobile Dependence Credit: Contribution to Jobs-Housing Balance Credit: School Proximity Credit: Access to Public Spaces p.11 p.15 p.l6 p.17 p.18 p.l9 p.21 p.22 p.23 Prerequisite: Imperiled Species and Ecological Communities Prerequisite: Parkland Preservation Prerequisite: Wetland & Water Body Protection Prerequisite: Erosion & Sedimentation Control Prerequisite: Farmland Preservation Credit: Support OfT-Site Land Conservation Credit: Site Design tor Habitat or Wetland Conservation Credit: Restoration of Habitat or Wetlands Credit: Conservation Management of Habitat or Wetlands Credit: Steep Slope Preservation Credit: Minimize Site Disturbance During Construction Credit: Minimize Site Disturbance Through Site Design Credit: Maintain Stonnwater Runoff Rates Credit: Reduce Stormwater Runoff Rates Credit: Stonnwater Treatment Credit: Outdoor Hazardous Waste Pollution Prevention p.24 p.24 p.26 p.27 p.29 p.30 p.32 p.33 p.35 p.36 p.37 p.39 p.41 p.43 p.44 p.45 p.47 IV. Environmental Preservation V. Compact, Complete & Connected Neighborhoods p.4S Prerequisite: Open Community Prerequisite: Compact Development Prerequisite: Diversity of Uses Credit: Compact Development Credit: Transit-Oriented Compactness Credit: Diversity of Uses Credit: Housing Diversity Credit: Affordable Rental Housing Credit: Affordable For-Sale Housing Credit: Reduced Parking Footprint Credit: Community Outreach and Involvement p.48 p.49 p.50 p.52 p.53 p.54 p.56 p.58 p.59 p.60 p.61 I! 81 DRAFT ONL Y 9/6/05 Credit: Block Perimeter p.63 Credit: Locating Buildings to Shape Walkable Streets p.64 Credit: Designing Building Access to Shape Walkable Streets p.65 Credit: Designing Buildings to Shape Walkable Streets p.66 Credit: Comprehensively Designed Walkable Streets p.67 Credit: Street Network p.68 Credit: Pedestrian Network p.69 Credit: Maximize Pedestrian Safety and Comfort p.70 Credit: Superior Pedestrian Experience p.72 Credit: Applying Regional Precedents in Urbanism and Architecture p.74 Credit: Transit Subsidy p.75 Credit: Transit Amenities p.76 Credit: Access to Nearby Communities p.77 Credit: Adaptive Reuse of Historic Buildings p.78 VI. Resource Efficiency p.80 Credit: Certified Green Building p.80 Credit: Energy Efficiency in Buildings p.81 Credit: Water Efficiency in Buildings p.83 Credit: Heat Island Reduction p.84 Credit: Infrastructure Energy Efficiency p.87 Credit: On-Site Power Generation p.88 Credit: On-Site Renewable Energy Sources p.89 Credit: Efficient Irrigation p.90 Credit: Greywater & Stoffi1water Reuse p.91 Credit: Wastewater Management p.92 Credit: Reuse of Materials p.93 Credit: Recycled Content p.94 Credit: Regionally Provided Materials p.95 Credit: Construction Waste Management p.96 Credit: Comprehensive Waste Management p.97 Credit: Light Pollution Reduction p.99 Credit: Contaminant Reduction in Brownfields Remediation p.IOO VI. Anticipated Accredited Professional and Innovation Credits p.IOI VII. Definitions p.l02 VIII. Appendix A: Sample "Letter Template" p.I04 IX. Appendix B: List of LEED-ND Core Committee Members p.I05 2 "'8 2 L DRAFT ONLY 9/6/05 INTRODUCTION Overview ofLEED-ND The U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), the Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU), and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)-three organizations that represent some of the nation's leaders among progressive design professionals, builders, developers, and the environmental community-have come together to develop a national set of standards for neighborhood location and design based on the combined principles of smart growth, urbanism, and green building. The goal of this partnership is to establish these standards for assessing and rewarding environmentally superior development practices within the rating framework of the LEEO® (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Oesign) Green Building Rating System. Unlike other LEEO products that focus primarily on green building practices, with relatively few credits regarding site selection, LEEO for Neighborhood Development (LEEO-NO) will place the emphasis on the elements that bring the buildings together into a neighborhood, and relate the neighborhood to its larger region and landscape. Our work is guided by sources such as the Smart Growth Network's ten principles of smart growth, the Charter of the New Urbanism, other LEED rating systems, and other pertinent criteria. In short, LEED-NO will create a label, as well as guidelines for design and decision-making, to serve as an incentive for better location, design, and construction of new residential, commercial, and mixed developments. The existing LEEO rating system for new commercial construction has a proven track record of encouraging builders to utilize green building practices such as increasing energy and water efficiency and improving indoor air quality in buildings. It is our hope that LEED-ND will have a similarly positive effect to encourage developers and community leaders to revitalize existing urban areas, reduce land consumption, reduce automobile dependence, promote pedestrian activity, improve air quality, decrease polluted stormwater runoff, and build more livable, sustainable, enduring communities for people of all income levels. Process and Timeline for Developing LEED-ND The LEED-NO Core Committee '-which consists of fifteen members selected by USGBC, CNU, and NROC-does the day-to-day work of developing the rating system, but a second, larger corresponding committee is also established for every LEEO product. In this way, a wider group of experts and interested parties can stay updated and provide feedback. The LEED-ND Core Committee has completed its first full draft of the LEED-ND Rating System, which follows, and is actively soliciting comments from the LEED-ND Corresponding Committee regarding their work thus far. I A complete list ofLEED-ND Core Committee members can be found at the end of this document in Appendix B. 3 ,..' 8!) , . , DRAFT ONLY 9/6/05 The comment period will run for 45 days in order to give sufficient time to comment. The LEED-ND Core Committee will then process your feedback and revise the draft into a pilot phase LEED-ND Rating System. The pilot phase will test the LEED-ND Rating System on the ground with a group of projects at various stages of planning and construction. An official call for pilot projects will be made to the LEED-ND Corresponding Committee, and the projects will be selected to reflect a diversity of project types. The pilot phase will last for approximately one year, after which further revisions will be made to the rating system, incorporating lessons learned during the pilot phase. Two public comment periods will then be held to solicit further feedback before the final approval and balloting processes take place. What is a "Neighborhood Development "? The LEED-ND Core Committee intends for LEED-ND to be used to certify exemplary development projects that perform well in tenns of smart growth, urbanism, and green building, and may constitute whole neighborhoods, fractions of neighborhoods, or multiple neighborhoods. Smaller, infill projects that may be just a single use, but complement existing neighboring uses, for instance, should be able to earn certification as well as larger mixed use developments. For the time being, the LEED-ND Core Committee has put no restrictions as to the minimum or maximum size a project would have to be in order to certify under LEED-ND. As for the more qualitative aspects of what makes a neighborhood, the LEED-ND Core Committee has refrained from defining the tenn precisely, but has been guided by the principles of smart growth and New Urbanism in writing credits that will recognize aspects of neighborhood that have proven most successful. The qualities of an ideal neighborhood include that it has a legible center and edge; is limited in size, typically five minutes average walk from center to edge; has a mix of land uses, to allow for some basic daily needs to be satisfied within the neighborhood; accommodates a diversity of household types; has an integrated network of walkable streets; and has special sites reserved for public spaces and civic buildings. LEED-ND is principally aimed on improving land-use patterns, neighborhood design, and technology in the United States. Please refer to the "LEED Product Development and Maintenance Manual" for infonnation on how LEED rating systems may be adapted and licensed for other countries. 2 Imvlementation Issues Several implementation issues have been discussed but not finalized by the LEED-ND Core Committee. These issues include, importantly, the stage at which official certification will take place, since a majority of the land use and neighborhood design 2 The "LEED Product Development and Maintenance Manual" or "LEED Product Development Handbook" is one of three LEED Foundations documents. It is posted for download on the "LEED" page of the USGBC website (www.usgbc.org). The direct link is http://www.usgbc.org/Display Page.aspx?Categorv 10= 19 . 4 084 . DRAFT ONLY 9/6/05 issues are settled at the planning stage, while full build-out of large-scale developments can take years. While the details have not been decided, it is the intent of the LEED-ND Core Committee to make available some form ofLEED-ND formal approval at the planning stage, such that it could be earned by developers at the stage of land use entitlements. The LEED-ND Core Committee invites comment on issues of implementation as well as on the specifics of the rating system language. About this Draft This draft of the LEED-ND Rating System is not final, and will likely be revised significantly before it is used for the pilot program. Credits and prerequisites may be added or deleted, and specific language under the "Requirements" or "Submittals" section may change significantly. Any projects that are considering applying to participate in the pilot program or hoping to achieve LEED-ND certification under either the pilot or final rating system should NOT design or construct a project with the expectation that the requirements for certification as drafted here will remain the same for the pilot or final rating systems. The LEED-ND Core Committee is currently organizing the LEED-ND Rating System into four categories: Location Efficiency; Environmental Preservation; Compact, Complete, & Connected Neighborhoods; and Resource Efficiency. These are different credit categories than have been used in other LEED rating systems, which are typically divided into the categories of Sustainable Sites, Water Efficiency, Energy & Atmosphere, Materials & Resources, and Indoor Environmental Quality. The current credit categories of LEED- ND may remain the same or merge with the credit categories of other LEED products; credits and prerequisites have been intentionally left un-numbered so that they may be rearranged with less confusion. The LEED-ND Rating System will be reviewed by LEED Technical Advisory Groups and by appropriate experts from the urbanist and smart growth constituencies. Credits or prerequisites that are based on credits and prerequisites in other LEED rating systems will be updated to reflect subsequent versions of those rating systems (e.g. LEED-NC version 2.2) unless the committee deems it inappropriate for the LEED-ND context. The LEED-ND Core Committee has attempted to balance the need for a rating system that is manageable in size against the many complexities associated with neighborhood location and design that contribute to or detract from environmental and social benefits. As the work progresses, the committee may aim to make the draft more manageable in size. It may also consider reducing the total number of potential credit points awarded in LEED-ND from the current 114 to 100. The argument for making this reduction is twofold: to make the weightings clear and transparent, and to reduce the overall complexity of the system. The value of such a strategy will have to be weighed against the potential loss of measures and gradations that may be important to determining whether a proposed development will achieve the purposes ofLEED-ND 5 uS:") DRAFT ONLY 9/6/05 Format & V ocabularv of the Draft The "Point Overview" at the beginning of this document shows the overall list of credits with the number of points attached to each credit in one place, along with the estimated levels of points needed to achieve the different levels (Certified, Silver, Gold, Platinum) of LEEO- NO certification. The rating system itself is divided into "Credits" and "Prerequisites." LEEO rating systems typically consist of a few prerequisites and many credits. In order to be certified, a project has to meet all of the prerequisites. Each credit is optional, but contributes to the project's point total. A certain point total is required for certification, and higher point scores are required for silver, gold, or platinum LEEO certification. Each prerequisite and credit is organized in a standardized format for simplicity and quick reference. The first three sections summarize key points regarding the purpose and compliance requirements. Subsequent sections in other LEEO reference guides (including the "Summary of Referenced Standards," "Concerns," "Oesign Approach," "Synergies & Trade-Offs," "Calculations," "Resources," and "Case Study" sections) provide supportive information to help with interpretation and implementation, but are largely undeveloped at this time for LEED-NO and are omitted. The "Intent" identifies the main goal(s) ofthe prerequisite or credit. "Requirements" specify the criteria to satisfy the prerequisite or credit. "Submittals" specify the documentation required for the LEED application. Where appropriate, this draft also includes additional sections, which may be helpful at this stage of development. The "Rationale" section may include other reasons for the development of the prerequisite or credit. "Sources & Resources" may list some ofthe sources for development of the credit, although the sources used are not always listed, and were often drawn from the collective expertise of committee members. This section may also include sources for more information on the topic. The "Notes" section contains any other comments or explanatory information. In a few instances there will be text boxes in this section indicating that the LEEO- NO Core Committee is explicitly requesting feedback on a particular issue, although comments on any issue are welcome. The "Definitions" section at the end of document contains definitions of potentially unfamiliar terms or acronyms, as well as familiar terms that are defined more precisely for the purposes of the LEEO-NO Rating System. Any term that is defined in this section is indicated as such in bold font for its first usage within a given credit or prerequisite. Finally, "letter templates" are referenced in the submittals sections throughout the rating system. The LEEO Letter Templates that are used for other LEEO products streamline preparation of LEEO certification applications by providing pre-formatted submittal sheets for each prerequisite and credit. They outline the specific project data needed to 6 "8 f" !.: ) DRAFT ONLY 9/6/05 demonstrate achievement of the LEED performance requirements and include calculation formulas where applicable. Letter Templates for existing LEED rating systems are currently available for download by those USGBC Web site users who have been given access to the online reference guide or the registered project welcome pages. A sample letter template is included as Appendix A. Questions for Comment All comments are welcome, and there are questions on the web-based comment form that provide opportunity for both general comments and credit-specific comments to be made. As noted above, there are text boxes in the "Notes" sections of some credits or prerequisites indicating that the LEED-ND Core Committee is explicitly requesting feedback on a particular issue. In addition, the LEED-ND Core Committee is interested in comments regarding the following two issues that apply to credits and prerequisites throughout the rating system: For some credits, multiple points are rewarded for meeting an individual performance threshold a number of places in the current draft. The LEED-ND Core Committee welcomes comments on how to reward intermediate levels of performance short of the one stated threshold. The weighted point assignments in this draft are likely to change as LEED-ND is refined, and the committee will benefit from constructive suggestions in this area. For some credits, the LEED-ND Core Committee has struggled to draft appropriate "intent" language (see below for more on "intents"). Some committee members have favored narrowly drafted intents that correspond more concisely to the requirements, to provide the clearest guidance possible to project teams throughout the design and credit interpretation process. Others believe that some intents must be drafted and interpreted more broadly to reflect the multiple purposes and benefits of particular strategies. The current draft strives to achieve a balance between the two approaches, but the committee recognizes that the balance may not be perfectly struck in all cases. The core committee invites comments on intent language in general and suggestions as to how to improve individual intents. About the Comment Period The comment period for this draft is not an official public comment period as required in the "LEED Foundations Policy Manua1.,,3 The LEED-ND Core Committee has elected at this time to seek comment on its progress thus far via this comment period. The comment period will be open for 45 days, beginning the day that notification of the availability of the draft is sent to the LEED-ND Corresponding Committee. The 3The "LEED Foundations Policy Manual" is one of three LEED Foundations documents. It is posted for download on the "LEED" page of the USGBC website (www.usgbc.org). The direct link is httD://www.usgbc.org/DisplavPage.aspx?CategorvlD=19 . 7 8 'j ... (. \, . DRAFT ONLY 9/6/05 comment solicitation is web-based, and while the comment period is open, it can be accessed at www.usgbc.org/leed/nd . About the LEED-ND Corresponding Committee As previously mentioned, the LEED-ND Core Committee does the day-to-day work of developing the rating system; a second, larger corresponding committee is also established for every LEED product. In this way, a wider group of experts and interested parties can stay updated and provide feedback. The LEED-ND Corresponding Committee is invited to comment on draft versions of the LEED-ND rating system and has the first opportunity to respond to the call for pilot LEED-ND projects. In addition, LEED-ND Corresponding Committee members receive minutes from LEED-ND Core Committee meetings and notification ofLEED-ND events. Readers of this document who are not already members of the LEED-ND Corresponding Committee are encouraged to join at this time. The LEED-ND Corresponding Committee is open to USGBC members and non-members alike, but there are different ways to join: · USGBC members should go to www.usgbc.org and subscribe to the LEED-ND committee listserv through the individual site user account section of the website. · If you are not a USGBC member, send an e-mail to nd@committees.usgbc.org stating that you'd like to join the LEED-ND Corresponding Committee. USGBC, CNU, NRDC, and the LEED-ND Core Committee thank you for taking the time to review this draft. We sincerely appreciate your participation in developing LEED-ND. 8 U8S DRAFT ONLY 9/6/05 POINT OVERVIEW Title Points Percenta£e of total Doints Location Efficiency (2 Prerequisites / 7 Credits / 28 Points / 25% of total points) Prerequisite: Transportation Efficiency -- -- Prerequisite: Water and Stormwater Infrastructure Efficiencv -- -- Credit: Contaminated Brownfields Redevelopment 4 3.5% Credit: High Cost Contaminated Brownfields Redevelopment I 0.9% Credit: Adjacent, Infil1, or Redevelopment Site 3 to 10 8.8% Credit: Reduced Automobile Dependence 2 to 6 5.3% Credit: Contribution to Jobs-Housing Balance 4 3.5% Credit: School Proximity I 0.9% Credit: Access to Public Space 2 1.8% Environmental Preservation (5 Prerequisites / I I Credits / 13 Points / II % of total points) Prerequisite: Imperiled Species and Ecological Communities -- -- Prerequisite: Parkland Preservation -- -- Prerequisite: Wetland & Water Body Protection -- -- Prerequisite: Farmland Preservation Prerequisite: Erosion & Sedimentation Control -- -- Credit: Support Off-Site Land Conservation 2 1.8% Credit: Site Design for Habitat or Wetlands Conservation I 0.9% Credit: Restoration of Habitat or Wetlands I 0.9% Credit: Conservation Management of Habitat or Wetlands I 0.9% Credit: Steep Slope Preservation I 0.9% Credit: Minimize Site Disturbance During Construction I 0.9% Credit: Minimize Site Disturbance Through Site Design I 0.9% Credit: Maintain Stormwater Runoff Rates I 0.9% Credit: Reduce Stormwater Runoff Rates I 0.9% Credit: Stormwater Treatment 2 1.8% Credit: Outdoor Hazardous Waste Pollution Prevention 1 0.9% Compact, Complete, & Connected Neiehborhoods (3 Prereq /22 Credits / 42 Points / 37% of total points) Prerequisite: Open Community -- n Prerequisite: Compact Development -- -- Prerequisite: Diversity of Uses -- -- Credit: Compact Development I to 5 Credit: Transit-Oriented Compactness I 0.9% Credit: Diversity of Uses I to 3 2.6% Credit: Housing Diversity 4 3.5% Credit: Affordable Rental Housing I to 2 1.8% Credit: Affordable For-Sale Housing 1 to 2 1.8% Credit: Reduced Parking Footprint 2 1.8% Credit: Community Outreach and Involvement I 0.9% Credit: Block Perimeter I to 4 3.5% Credit: Locating Buildings to Shape Walkable Streets I 0.9% Credit: DesÌfming Building Access to Shape Walkable Streets I 0.9% Credit: Designing Buildings to Shape Walkable Streets I 0.9% Credit: Comprehensively Designed Walkable Streets 2 ].8% Credit: Street Network I 0.9% Credit: Pedestrian Network I 0.9% Credit: Maximize Pedestrian Experience I 0.9% Credit: Superior Pedestrian Experience I to 2 1.8% Credit: Applvin2: Regional Precedents in Urbanism and Architecture I 0.9% Credit: Transit Subsidy 3 2.6% 9 u 8 ~'} DRAFT ONLY 9/6/05 Title Points Percental!e of total points Credit: Transit Amenities I 0.9% Credit: Access to Nearby Communities I 0.9% Credit: Adaptive Reuse of Historic Buildings I to 2 1.8% Resource Efficiency (0 Prerequisites / 17 Credits / 25 Points / 22% of total oints) Credit: Certified Green Building I to 5 4.4% Credit: Energy Efficiency in Buildings I to 3 2.6% Credit: Water Efficiency in Buildings I to 2 1.8% Credit: Heat Island Reduction I 0.9% Credit: Infrastructure Energy Efficiency I 0.9% Credit: On-Site Power Generation I 0.9% Credit: On-Site Renewable Energy Sources I 0.9% Credit: Efficient Irrigation I 0.9% Credit: Greywater & Stormwater Reuse 2 1.8% Credit: Wastewater Management I 0.9% Credit: Reuse of Materials I 0.9% Credit: Recycled Content I 0.9% Credit: Regionally Provided Materials I 0.9% Credit: Construction Waste Management I 0.9% Credit: Comprehensive Waste Management I 0.9% Credit: Light Pollution Reduction I 0.9% Credit: Contaminant Reduction in Brownfields Remediation I 0.9% Other (Q Prerequisites / 2 Credits / 6 Points / 5% of total points) Anticipated Accredited Professional Innovation Credit(s) I to 2 1.8% Anticipated Innovation Credit(s) I to 4 3.5% TOTAL 114 100% Anticipated Certification Levels (Percentages taken from the "LEED Product Development and Maintenance Manual") Certifìed: Silver: Gold: Platinum: 46 - 56 points (40% of total points) 57 - 67 points (50% of total points) 68 - 90 points (60% of total points) 91 - 114 points (80% of total points) 10 DRAFT ONLY 9/6/05 COMPACT, COMPLETE & CONNECTED NEIGHBORHOODS Credit: Block Perimeter (1 to 4 Points) Intent To promote connectivity. Requirements (I) Limit average block perimeter within the project, as follows: Avera2e block perimeter Points available Between 1551 and 1800 feet I Between 1300 and 1550 feet 2 Between 1050 and 1299 feet 3 Between 800 and 1049 feet 4 The perimeter of each block includes the properties bounded by the sidewalk or the equivalent provision for walking, and does not include the sidewalks themselves. Submittals Provide the following: I) The LEED Letter Template, signed by the responsible party, declaring that the requirements have been met; and 2) a site plan indicating the length of block perimeters, and 3) a calculation of the average block perimeters within the project. Notes Examples of average block perimeter patterns: between 1550 and 1800 feet = historic Miami size between 1050 and 1299 feet = most TNDs between 800 and 1049 feet = historic Portland size between 1120 and 1640 feet = historic Savannah . "". .'~I !.'" , 63 . Q' \. \., DRAFT ONLY 9/6/05 COMPACT, COMPLETE & CONNECTED NEIGHBORHOODS Credit: Pedestrian Network (1 Point) Intent Provide direct and safe connections, for pedestrians to local destinations and neighborhood centers. Promote public health though increased physical activity. Requirements I) Provide continuous sidewalks or equivalent provisions for walking along all streets within the project. New sidewalks must be at least four feet wide. Equivalent provisions for walking include woonerfS and footpaths. Sidewalks are not required on both sides of the street where the street is designed for a speed of 10 miles per hour or lower. Submittals Provide the following: 1) The LEED Letter Template, signed by the responsible party, declaring that the requirements have been met; and 2) a site plan indicating the location and width of all new sidewalks or equivalent provisions for walking. Notes The LEED-ND Core Committee would like to ensure that this credit is flexible and available to projects in different contexts, but is concerned about whether or not unpaved footpaths would be unusable for those with certain disabilities. The committee is seeking comment on the issue. Woonelfis a Dutch word that means "street for living". In practice, it is common space shared by pedestrians, bicyclists, and low-speed motor vehicles. They are usually streets raised to the same grade as curbs and sidewalks. Vehicles are slowed by placing trees, planters, parking areas, and other obstacles in the street, so that motorists travel at walking speed. 69 l.! 9 2 DRAFT ONLY 9/6/05 COMPACT, COMPLETE & CONNECTED NEIGHBORHOODS Credit: Maximize Pedestrian Safety and Comfort (1 Point) Intent Provide direct, safe, and comfortable connections, for pedestrians and bicyclists, to local destinations and neighborhood centers. Promote public health though increased physical activity. Requirements (1) Provide on-street parking on 80% of all new streets, AND Design and construct all streets within the project, whether new or existing, for a maximum speed of 20 mph for primarily residential streets or 25 mph for primarily commercial streets, AND Plant street trees between the vehicle travel way and sidewalk at intervals of no less than 40 feet; AND Ensure that a majority of ground-floor dwelling units have an elevated finished floor no less than 24" above the sidewalk grade. The percentage of on-street parking shall be measured by comparing the length of street designated for parking to the total length of the curb around the perimeter of each block, including curb cuts, driveways, and intersection radii. Submittals Provide the following: I) The LEED Letter Template, signed by the responsible party, declaring that the requirements have been met; and 2) a site plan indicating (A) the location of on-street parking; (B) the speeds for which streets are designed and the legal speed limits posted; (C) the location of street trees; and (D) the location of dwelling units which have an elevated finished floor. Rationale Street tree intervals are meant to be adequate when mature to provide buffer/driver alertness. Sources & Resources 70 9 "I , . " , '. ... DRAFT ONLY 9/6/05 For more on tree planting see Trees in Urban Design, 2nd edition, by Henry F. Arnold ISBN: 0442203365(pp. 53-54,64) According to traffic engineer Walter Kulash, In urban areas, statistical analysis says that street trees planted in close proximity to the edge of the street improve safety. (Lee and Mannering, 1995, for the Washington State DOT) The shade from street trees is a highly significant factor in retarding the oxidation of the binder, and hence in prolonging pavement life on local streets. When we consider that local streets comprise about 90% of all street mileage, the impact of street trees on resurfacing costs becomes apparent. Notes Elevated floors provide a sense of privacy for occupants of dense housing and facilitate the opening curtains and other interior window treatments, allowingfor more "eyes on the street" to promote community safety. They also provide pedestrians with a comfortable sense that they are not intruding upon privacy of residents. But they raise the need to provide special adaptations to provide accessibility for persons of all physical abilities. The LEED-ND Core Committee is working to find a solution that serves all parties, and is considering developing a credit to encourage and recognize achievement in creating superb visitability and accessibility. The committee invites comment on the topic. 71 ! 9/1 DRAFT ONLY 9/6/05 COMPACT, COMPLETE & CONNECTED NEIGHBORHOODS Credit: Superior Pedestrian Experience (1 to 2 Points) Intent Provide appealing and comfortable pedestrian street environments in order to promote pedestrian activity. Requirements (1) In commercial or mixed use projects, design and build 50% or more of the total number of office buildings to include ground floor retail; AND Ensure that all businesses and/or other community services on the ground floor are accessible directly from sidewalks along a public space such as a street, square, or plaza; (1 point) AND/OR (2) Place trees or other structures to provide shade when mature over at least half the length of sidewalks included within or contiguous to the project. The estimated crown diameter (the width of the shade if the sun is directly above the tree) is used to calculate the shaded area. (1 point) Submittals Provide the following: 1) The LEED Letter Template, signed by the responsible party, declaring that the requirements have been met; and 2) a site plan indicating the location of any office buildings, any ground floor retail, any sidewalk entrances to businesses or community services, any vistas, and any shade trees or other structures. Sources & Resources For more on tree planting see Trees in Urban Design, 2nd edition, by Henry F. Arnold ISBN: 0442203365 (pp. 53-54, 64 Davis, California's parking lot 50% shading ordinance: www.city.davis.ca.us/pb/pdfs/planning/fonns/Parking Lot Shading Guidelines.pdf http://www.city.davis.ca.us/pcs/trees/master.cfm 72 \)95 DRAFT ONLY 9/6/05 See also "Maximize Pedestrian Safety" for infonnation on how shade prolongs durability of sidewalks in many wann climates. 73 DRAFT ONLY 9/6/05 ('! 9f; RESOURCE EFFICIENCY Credit: On-Site Power Generation (1 Point) Intent Reduce air, water, and land pollution from energy consumption and production by increasing the efficiency of the power delivery system. Increase the reliability of power. Requirements 1) Develop or incorporate into future project build out through CC&Rs or other binding documents, on-site source(s) of power generation sufficient to meet at least 5% of the energy needs of all building uses and commonly owned infrastructure in the project. Base energy demand is based on the allowable entitled area for the project, according to the following categories: Category 1: For non-residential buildings and residential buildings over 3 stories, establish the budget based on a design of 15% below ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1 - 1999 or 15% below the local energy code, whichever is more stringent. Category 2: For residential buildings 3 stories or fewer, establish the budget based on compliance with Energy Star requirements. Calculations for total on-site energy can include future site or building-integrated systems stipulated through CC&Rs or other binding documents. Submittals Provide the following: 1) The LEED Letter Template, signed by the responsible party, declaring that the requirements have been met; and 2) a narrative describing the on-site power generation systems; and 3) calculations demonstrating the percentage of the project's total energy demand supplied by the on-site power generation system(s); and 4) a copy of any CC&Rs or other binding documents. 88 t, q "(í . I DRAFT ONLY 9/6/05 RESOURCE EFFICIENCY Credit: On-Site Renewable Enen!v Sources (1 Point) Intent Reduce environmental impacts associated with fossil fuel energy generation by increasing the use of on-site renewable energy sources. Requirements (1) Design and specify, or incorporate into future project build-out through CC&Rs or other binding documents, the use of shared on-site nonpolluting renewable energy generation technologies such as solar, wind, geothermal, low-impact hydroelectric, and biomass to supply at least 5% of the total energy used by all building uses and commonly owned infrastructure in the project. Base energy demand is based on the allowable entitled area for the project, according to the following categories: Category 1: For non-residential buildings and residential buildings over 3 stories, establish the budget based on a design of 15% below ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1 - 1999 or 15% below the local energy code, whichever is more stringent. Category 2: For residential buildings 3 stories or fewer, establish the budget based on compliance with Energy Star requirements. Calculations for total on-site energy can include future site or building-integrated systems stipulated through CC&Rs or other binding documents. Submittals Provide the following: 1) The LEED Letter Template, signed by the responsible party, declaring that the requirements have been met; and 2) a narrative describing the on-site renewable power generation systems; and 3) calculations demonstrating the percentage of the project's total energy demand supplied by the on-site renewable power generation system(s); and 4) a copy of any relevant CC&Rs or other bindi!lg documents. Sources & Resources This credit was adapted from LEED-NC 2.1. 89 (: 9:i DRAFT ONL y 9/6/05 RESOURCE EFFICIENCY Credit: Efficient Irri2ation (1 Point) Intent Conserve potable water. Requirements (1) For_common or public landscaped areas, reduce potable water consumption for irrigation, except for initial watering to establish plants, by at least 50% compared to conventional means through native plant selection, high-efficiency irrigation technology, rainwater harvesting and/or greywater systems; AND stipulate CC&Rs or other binding documents to insure future compliance by building owners~ Submittals Provide the following: 1) The LEED Letter Template, signed by the responsible party, declaring that the requirements have been met; and 2) a calculation of the percentage potable water consumption for site irrigation has been reduced; and 3) a brief narrative of the equipment and/or plant selection; and 4) a copy of the CC&Rs or other binding documents. Sources & Resources This credit was adapted from LEED-NC 2.1. 90 \·9:1 DRAFT ONLY 9/6/05 DEFINITIONS Adequate transit service - Adequate bus or light rail service is defined as at least four buses or trains per hour during peak periods. (See definition below) Adequate heavy rail or ferry service is defined as at least 5 trains or ferries per weekday peak period. Adjacent - Having at least 25% of the perimeter bordering something else. Adjacent sites have 25% of their perimeter bordering land that has been previously developed. (See definition below. Compare also to infill site, below.) Area median income - Determined for each county and available from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Buildable land - when used in density calculations, excludes: · Public streets and other public rights of way · Land occupied by nonresidential structures · Land excluded from residential development by law or other prerequisites ofLEED-ND. CC&Rs - Codes, Covenants, & Restrictions. Development footprint - The entire building footprint, access roads and parking areas. FAR - Floor Area Ratio. Greywater - Detìned by the Uniform Plumbing Code (UPe) as "untreated household waste water which has not come into contact with toilet waste. Grey water includes used water from bathtubs, showers, bathroom wash basins, and water from clothes-washer and laundry tubs. It shall not include waste water from kitchen sinks or dishwashers." Some states and local authorities allow kitchen sink wastewater to be included in greywater. Project teams should comply with greywater definitions as established by the authority having jurisdiction in their areas. Infill site - A site having at least 75% of its perimeter bordering land that has been previously developed. (See definition below. Compare also to adjacent site, above.). In-holding - a privately owned parcel of land within the boundaries of a public preserve, especially within a national park or national seashore (American Heritage) Peak periods - 5:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. Previously developed - Having pre-existing paving, construction, or altered landscapes. Land that is currently in agricultural use, forestry use, or is a preserved natural area is not considered previously developed. 102 '.' ""1 q .1 'j · , DRAFT ONL Y 9/6/05 Previously developed sites have at least 75% land which has been previously developed. Pre-project - Before the current LEED-ND applicant project was initiated, but (if the land was developed or altered for a previous use) not before any development or alteration took place. Describes conditions on the site as the current developer found them. Prime soils - soils with chemical, hydrographic and topological properties that make them especially suited to the production of crops. The Natural Resources Conservation Agency is responsible for identifying prime soils, and they make detailed soil surveys and maps available for every county in the United States. All of the NRCS data are available for download to GIS mapping programs. Project - The land and construction that constitutes the basis for LEED-ND application. Post-project - After the current LEED-ND applicant project is completed. TND - Traditional Neighborhood Design/Development Use type - individual use types include residential, retail, office. "Commercial" is not a single use type. Unique soils - soils with chemical, hydrographic and topological properties that make them especially suited to specific crops. The Natural Resources Conservation Agency is responsible for identifying unique soils, and they make detailed soil surveys and maps available for every county in the United States. All of the NRCS data are available for download to GIS mapping programs. Wetlands - defined by the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Manual: "Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas." Ilm0¿¿\,,-_\.y~\i~,-(;tJ(1l1Çb,ç~) 1)íLÇg,'illJ!2gç(L2s:.htl!l Walking distance - the distance that a pedestrian must travel between destinations without obstruction, in a safe and comfortable environment such as on sidewalks, footpaths or other pedestrian facilities. VMT - vehicle miles traveled. 103 1. 'ì -, APPENDIX C Summary of Stakeholder Input {" ~\~ (.~'ë 1Q ~IV .J;S: :::! " .... ." ::: ::: ~ '" : :: : ~ .. = .'::: Q .::: ..... ." ~ ~ ~ ::: ~ .. rJl ~ .. ...... "'- = .. .. Q ::: '" ~ .;: ~ 't: ~ " ¡., ';'S ~ ::: ::: I .. .. ';'S è' " ~ ~ ." = .. ~ = {¡ = ." U ::: rJl -€' ~ ~ ~ ...... ..... = "'0 ::: ~ " = = ~ ~ ::: Q. = ... .. Q. Q ';'S -< '" u .'" ~ ~ ::: Q ~ Q '" :§ ~ ¡¡ ." ¡., {¡ Q " ~ ..::: '" ~ = '" .... '" ~ .. ::: ~ ..::: - " .c ¡: ~ ~ f-; "'- ~ ~ ...¡ '" ';'S ::: ;:. .15 ..!: .. .~ ~ ~ " " .::¡ ~~ ::: S §- ... "... ~ ~-E " .~.~ o!: ~7 ~ ~'" ::: "§~ ~ .S ~ ~ ...... '" ~4: .'" '" ~ ~ "".:; '5 ~ " ~ ..."" '" ~ §- ~ '"ò'~ ';'S ~ ð'~ ~ '¡; ~ '0 " .~ ~~ = ~.~ ¡ ~.5 ë ~ ê" ~ "'0 ë } .~~ ~ g~ "0 on 1-0_ I Q,I = <n (.) ~ 'C '5~ lê~~t ~ ': ~ '§ =~c~ : ~'~'[ ¡ ~~] e = ~~ E ~ 8 ~ 8·; ~ § t)J:¡¡..,:IJ ..... Q,, t'3.... ; ~ s] Q,,'-:::O I :º 00 i : "5 .~ <: =- ~g. c.. .-..r::: ~ .~~ ~ 8.~ ... _ v Q ~..r::: ¡:: :r - ::II: = .S '" '" CIoI r:n - = 'ª = = .S CIoI_ .. ~ ~ t I CIoI t'~ ~ .. e~ e-a =- r:n ~ !J e = = CIoI <:> e .:: § ~ u¡;,;¡ ,.:.::0(1 <:> ,g '" ,.:.:: ~ .. .- <:>!Š ~¡;,;¡ .¡ = _ <:> ~~ ,.Q '" ~ <:> í-< ..,;¡ ¡~- u I Q,I '-~. ~ != II) = .- II.. = 't = "0 .s- g. t "5 ~ I~:;'; ~ ~ ... cz:: 0'._ ~ ~¡¡~~ !fH~ I :¡ = .. 5 .. ... 'S 0' .. cz:: Q :z: ¿¡ ¡..¡ ¡..¡ ..¡ .... <= '" .. Q., 5 '" '" ¡..¡ 1. :"-) :'? 1) ~ 0 v ~ .- ~ ~ u oc- "'0 ~ ~ ~ I 2 2 .;:¡ ~e~]§ -< on t: OJ} ] - Co 'õ l'3.§ ~ ï ~ ~. g ~ .'~ '5 ~ :g ¡ .i VI ~~'5~~ ~ ~ ~~] ~ ~l i § ~ ~.Ë~t1~ :E -š ~'ê:¡; ¡iO: ~¡~ 1J P. oS ~ ~ $-: ~ ~~. ~ ~ š I.; ~ :8 ~ ~ roJ] '.;::::OJC-::: ~. ~ ¡¿V 1) :.as E~ ;._~ .5 VI .g :ê ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ B ~ i b : -g ~ ? g .;¡; .<:.5 ~ iã 5.c: ," OIJ '" . .c: g " :q I' ~ iJ t:~ ~ ¡¡ 5E ~ ~ ~ ]~ g: ~ ~ ~ ~. ~¡ ] 0 C~~C§ ~,.__W.'.'=~ ~Su v~p ~~ I . "'0 OJ 0.. 8 :s! "'0 ·ã.Þ ':: ~ : u =..D i!:: u ::: c OJ i ~ '§ ~~ ~ ~ ã s:9 0 ~ C -0 C ~j] g ~ ~ fi '5 ~ I}; ~ cŠ s ~ ~ ~ ~ g ·i ] ~ ~ ~ -&, ~] ~ ~ -5 ! ;.9 S -B u ~ § ~.~ ~ ,iL9 ~ § ] '5 ~. f~ ! ~ :~.~ "B t ~ I:: g 'ò~ cO ~ 5 ~ 'g.~,~~. v ~. ã ~ i] é: g ~ .g ~ ] ~ -E]] ~, ~] -g § E ~I~ ~ . ~ ~ ª !.-::: ~ :s! .5 fi t: '3 0 ~.; --¡¡; lJ ~ :: C':S u ~ "'0"3 6 ~ Õ ..D ..= : E ~ e ~;§] ê" 'E'~ ã ~ .g ] ~ 0 ~ 15 ~ ~ ~ tâ Ë Ë.g 5 i;J ~ :; 2 ~ 8 ~ .~ ':' g :§ ~ ~ B _ gp t; ~ ~ : ~ -;; ~ ] g ~ 1~~~J~Jj~~~'3t1~ i:g~ ~~§-~~ ~*':;¡f'~'Š~ I ~:§ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~;'5 ~~ §].Ë ~ ~:§ ~ ~ 1 g ~ ] 3 ~ "E ~ _ C':S .š lL~ :: 8 ; ~ ~ g ::9 8. ~I.~ ~ ~ 'ë.:§ ::: :ë ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I g .; "':"";; B ~ ~ ,5 ,<;:f"'; -'5J ~ g ~ "3 ~ -0 ~ ~ ~ OJ .E f ~ ~ iG -- I =§o g ~ ·f -t: ~' ~ :â E § ~ ~ ~ -'5J ~ ~ ~,~] ~ 15 ~ g) ~ ~ .~. ~ ] . COo", ':¡:: 1-0 lr':I I-< U e 1:: ,<;:::: C VI - ::I.,,:: "'0 "'0 .;: 0 u - 0...D ~ ! ~ :9 g '§ ~ ~ B 0] 4: '5 ~ 0 ~'§ g ~ [?: ~:ï :.s : ¡: u:2 "5 , ;j~ S ;:¡ C':S Õ ~ ~ Š "'0 0.5 (,¡... å' E! õ ~ ~ ..D 0 E - 0 ;::: ~ - u ..D g ... I :l :: .:: .:=: ::: ::: ::: ,-"3 E Eo.... -; :I :: "'0 :S..D Ë e- ~ -.::: :I 6i3~}:S"= ¡q ! g õ ~ § ~ 2 ~ ~] ~ lr':I .f' ~ .: .; ~ 8. ~ g:s 0.. ~ æ ~ ~ ~ ~ g 2 ~ ; ;;, ~j ~ .Þ ea'; ~ ~ u] s·~ ¡;; ~ 5 t) ~ ~ g ~ 8 ¡:.,. £. u ~ 0 ::: ¡;; e i ~ .:3:.a ,.g :: ~ ~ ~ B § .:; '(? £: ;,g..= ~ ~ ..a -'5J ~]"g E u £ ~ u E I~<_~·_:~<",,,,:::e~~~~~c~~~~~<~~~~~~ II I I I ' I , ,I ,,! OJ Õ ~ .- I" ë : g. s ~ :~,ß g :.g E ~ I~,g ~ IIii ~J li~~~ CO "..1 'n .~~, ~ Ë 1;;'<: ~ ? iiti¡ i ~ i ~ ~ i C .... C ~ I] g ~ § ¡"g~~~ I~.~~: ¡p:: '" </;'00 " v " U o " s] V" .<;:::: s::: ~ " I;: 1) c ~ .- " I § ~ .' ~ .~ u Ê ~ r B c I~~ " - " v § ~ ~ " v " ~§e- u ~'- .9:Gc; ~ :' 1:: ;]' ~ .~,,~ ·ê - - " "- Q." I I 1= I.s I~ I~ '''' .. .~ -:; = ... :¡ .. :¡ <= ~ "'I ~ ~i ,<;:f ¡;¡ fJ I~ Ii ~J.g ~.~ U' 5 "u :z: '" ~.~ e:'S 6'~ U '" - .. ~ S'~ ~ ~ u"§ ~-¡ -o¡:l, :z: cz:: ~] S ¡¡ ~·t~ ~ :È .~ :2 ij U .~ ~ ~ i SötL I~ I.S] E- o :] i'g. ,,, ,0:: ¡ I --~_.~.__._- (,) v ~ "- ~ 5 '.) ~] s ~ ~r:~-: . -=-~::':~ .~ ~ ~ ] ~ ~ ~ ~ ] .~) 00 I-< "'0 '~;g~-§ J;æ~刺 QI) ~ C ~ :::: ~]'~] ~ C':S 1-0 c.. v 8 ~ ~ .s) ~ ~ ~ g § t'~ .<;::::~ t;;;;...= 1~:2g~~ ._.":: .... -.::: u I: ~~~~ §.g~g; E ~': ~ 'õ '[ ~ 15 -ª ~ ~:g~~~ ~.~ ~ ~.= Ij~g ð ~ , I ;;: ~ " g o Z ~ " " 'g 0 .~ " t: -&, 0 Q. Q. " ~ 0 8 ã iE .<:J: -.... .5 v 0 ~ 5 ~ '5 e " Q.U ~ ö=§ " " 'E " ]@ " 0 E~ - v .~.~ o " " " 8" « E Q." 1"8 'ä ,A ~]- U v " {J ;U .g È'S o ¡¡ ~oõ.. ..." " 0 ci M '¿tj E ~ Ë ~ '1) =] ]- .~ ~î ~ ~ ~.5 g ~ = g!~ Q) IV "'0 c: "" ë. ~ ~ 1) "'0 ! 'Ê:-Ë ~] .¿ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Õ 9 -d!1 ~ï::~~~B ~;¡)~ ~~s~1 ~ ~:.š]IE 2 .~ § i"ß 1 ... 0 -I c.. c. u·... 100 ". .~ ~ ] .~ "0 .. ~ ~ 'g. 'f¡ I:: ..c - =~CE2 .·~:::Æ·~ : ~ .~ '[ ] ~:; M .g -Ë. ~ ~ ~ ~] ~ ~ ~ ~ .Ë ~ ß g ] E ~ ~ c:: 0 ~ 9 c c.. c....c 12 e t; 8 ~ ~ &.5 ~ ~ ~ ~¡ s c{ 'j :=: c._v 11~-g._B; u·S:!~õ8.§.c "'....." bJ)lootn ="";" Eª~].f· ë ~ ~'§ 8-5:; :a 8.:ð"'O¡1i !..s§ê.s·~~ Oo.a~~ or:; 00 Õ ~ .....'- ,f' ~ ~ ~ ~ 2- of .~<gj.~]. 5~ã-al~ ~ ~g.-ª~å -ª~]]~ ..... I Q., .=... In E E (Ij .c "'0 c ..... 'II:: 10 Ê~g8o =§:9g-g~ = ~ 'õ e 51J~.s ] ~ ~ :/1 ~ I rn·~.."'" ...::.:: Q..... 1.1'- "'0 VJ;:: Q) I J '" :~ I, s õ,.g s ¡g"3 ~ ~ ~ :3 .~ :s ] ..... ~ 8 8 ~ ¡:: ~ ~ ~I~ .......;; I ~ =/ ~ 'I áJ .S I' -~ ~ ii' = _ !J e ~ ¡¡ e =1 e = .... t rn 5 i;; 1.111 g e ~ Q I~~ ~ ~ ~ '~I i ~ o ~ e a ~ ~I ~ ~ ': :Ê¡ : ~ - = I..... ~ ~ 18 ":' ...;¡ [-j:: u 1-..... ~.! ~ = CI:I Q ~ ;a I[§¡¡'êl 5 :º ~.; ~i ~ §: ~,,~~!¡g -< ~ ¡¡ c.:: ...1 ~ §-~ ~:: ~ "5 ~ ; =¡z .:.: '" e =1 å; § e ';:Ii ~U~~ 1 I-- I " ,,') I) i ,I ,. 'v .~7. ~~F;: ¡- Tjgr I § t, 0: ~ 111 ~ § i~ ~~ :,!i' ~ §- ... ~ -:: IB ~~ I"'" .. " 11ì ~ ~ i I Ie. ~ \Q I tI "§ ~ i~ ::: ~ I g Ull ill ~ §. I~ ~ ~~ d:: 0 ~.~ I~~ iJ ~ 1"'1" ----~~---- I~ , ~---r-- I i , ¡ I~ I~ :?J I.~J ¡ ~ - i § I ~ I 5. ~ i~ I ~ II~_~ Ii Ig::" ~ I;;;" Ið;ð I~' ~, ~ -ª' ~ e ~ E ¡Ii Ii] OJJ Cù ¡t O!J 101) ~ ;:I ;:I ~ IV) v:: W ._~---..J___~~~ H'_ ït;; I'" :,§ I ! II Ii ¡-g ::: ~. I~ I~ I'~ I~ "" II' I~ I, I l- I I I i i I I i i a 'd" € " '" §' -5i "" " I~ I ~. =B I[ " is. ~ " ~ >, I!' 1-" Ie- ê ~ .... " '5 "0 5 I~ I ~, BJ I'i~ 0) " JÆ!__ ----.---- -¡,f¡i--!--- -r-- -g- -:----~-I I "0 c: , tI ~ I ~:. ~¡ I I I Ë I g g ~ II II ¡ II ~: ¡ II I!~ ~ I~ ~ g. .~ õ .g s I'g ¡.., ~ "3 ~ = gß :9~~.g ~ ~ I I'] i I~ ! : ~ '~ : I ,~. 'c; I] ~ .~ § Ë II IU~ ¡If:i ~_-~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ '§ ~ I lï~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ] ;3 1::. c: ~ ~ " I::: ~~) ~ ~,~ ~ I s::: ¡.., c: c: .~ ~ ~ 0 ~ :9 I! I~] ij I~ 1! ~ U ~ .;!3: a: 'E E 18:g'~ ..s::: $2 ~ t IIJ s::: :J - c: 0:; 0 "'0 _ ~;:I..s::: I !~]] g5õ~:L I II I~~!'~ . E~- I IIJ"::: u Õ ']:9.Š ~ Q.":::' 5 .§ ~ I ] ~ ~ '" ¡;' 1:s .f'~';¡ 'ã ~':I III Iii i~ ~ I~ ~ L l~!~ ~ ¡ E J: U ..s::: '-= ::: ~ ;= ~ c: 0 ¡.., ~I, I ,ullJ~O ~G'~15~5t~~OJ~ 'I I G :E :Ê ] ..a ð ;:! ~..c ~..s::::E C 'U[ I 1'-' f- f- f- If-, -= J'J f- 0!Jf- f- f- I I· , , , I, " , '" , ~+----~ I~ i~ II~ 1'1 i , ~ I 1"'3 -g , ,§ " Ic: 1"'0 Ii II I"B ! 8 I 1<1) . I § I'';; ,g ..., 'U VJ ,..c E "0 i] ,~.B I.';:! II § ê 16 í:n ~ "0 " i,~ .~ § ì IIJ IIJ U [' § ~ I § ~ ü ~ u "@¡ I'~'E '~~J IQ.O As::: 2: ~:.a ¡t tI c: ;:I 13 ~ J.~-~- í-- I I I I I i] I~ '5 I.g 5 10- i n U 0) O!J " 0.. '" c £j ,S OJ) c 'B ;::S 0- "'" o &' ~~ ¡:: 'c .~ = [;1 ~ ";j §:: 'g ;1 ~ ~ I.... c = .g ë. '" e .. .. &"g 1j .. '~ ~ '" =, "",'" I;·~ c ~ .. .. g. ,r: IJ: ~ .. ~ 1@ E Ë 5 i3 ~ ufo¡¡ -;; òil '" .g ~ ·st ;a ,st ~ "'O,.Q .... <:OUJ-ö HI ~ 1! --~-- - I I I I õi '~ .§ "0 ¡¡¡ , ]i ~j o ~ ,- 0 Ii 8[ E Ë '" o -¡¡ [; "0 ~ "0 -¡¡ '" ~ <: ~ '" -~--~ !''-! , .7. (.~:;; . .1:2 1~~ ~ "'O~] ~ _ 1.1 1) ~ "'0_ -õ ã c,~ ð. ~ c:g ~.~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ê . ~ :g.~ ~ ~ E ~.~ Õ -0 .9 .~ ~ .~ ¡¡ "0 .[ .: QI) "ß ~ ~ -; E ~ ~ ~ y:§ ~ ·E i ]? E ~ ~·t ; ~ ! 'E ~ ~ '§. ] ~ ~ ~ l~ ¡ ¡ ] ~ ~ j } J Q..~E1-o::.\:) c:: 1- o:.a ~c:~~]~ ~) ~ ~<: "'0 ~ ~ E 'g...:::- ;g B ~ ,~ c~c::Ê~§ ~ ~ :;~ ~ ~ '~ '[ ~ ~ ,~ 0 1) c bJJ~ 1) :a u E.s ~ ~ Š ;];::].ð Š ~ oi)~~ E f::: § ~ ~:g .2 ~ .§ '5 .~ =~~Eë-g ~.¿o ~~~ U·6'.Ð~i?g~ ~gå' ~c.':= ë ~ ~ -3 8.~ ¡..; ~ of .~ ::;I ~ 0 =Ee~]~~~g:: '"B.È~ .!3-..... ~ .... -"'0 t: ,- ..0 :-= .~ "'0 --: .~ 00 õ ~ :a';¡; c ~"Éh ~ E ~ ~ 1: ~ < I ~ ~ ::. .s 'v ê' 2 '3 ,..J ~ :§ c. .s ] ~ .9 ~.~ ~ 'g. 2 -Ë .-4 Q..': ~ ¡g,::.s] ~ .g, g ~.ð g ::tt: I Q _,.:.¡:.::;I '1) c's"'O¡:;"¿':s!"'O 1) = ¡..c ,5 S í 8 F1 c ~ ;::I'~:-= g "3 a .S -E ~ ~ i ~ .[ ~';' ~ ~.È ~ ~.9' ¿ 1:'-1 = v ..c Ie... ::;I....: :: O"~._.- g. ~ '" > == - ,0 " c.c 0 ~ .~ e ¡: " ~ ~ I'" 1 ;VJ UJ ..::::: ¡.... ...I::: VJ ;::. <1.1 ~ = I ~! -ª =! ~ I ~ ~r~-I-~~=-------- - ~, 10 ¡.., .... 0 ~èl :;~c::~] ~ l;::Io~oa t' rIJ ff'õ' § ~ ;::I = ~ i 1-8 :.~.5 ] e ~ Q,I 1:;- ~ ] ~ ~ == ~ !g,8.~:~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ Ë .§. .g .š ]" [ ã = = I ~ è ,5 ~].s 4,)0 ~ ~;2.g~1:i e .:: :z i 0 '2 "a '¡;j ~ e 61 ~ ic§ ~'E.Ë ~J ð ~I ~ I~ == ~.~ 0 . ~ ~. ~ i~!]j]l ,g ~ ~ í~.s-5õ E"~ ~.. .. I ~ «z ,5 .g ·Ê '¥ .. 'C ë.. ~ ~ Õ ;¡...:;.i: ~ e ~ .,~ ~ ; ] ê'-g ".. ~ i ~ ! 5 ¡;; g,~ a 'cO = = ~ i~ -: ~ ~ ~ b .-4 .S I ~ ~ '5> ~ ~.g ~ ~ -; ~ 6.=';::':-- ,Q ... I g 0iJ 4) 1;:.~ '$ = 0 ,..J 5 oS ,5 ~ ~ ¡.. ...;¡-¡---- u ~ ;; = .. c.. c.. < I Ie ~ ; ~ = C"'O C¡ C. =" Q,I '£:I :g ~ '3 ~i ~ ~~¡~~~I~ c.~..tS8 ~;g S'-;i .0= ~ e § æ = E'= ~ðJjo I i ---t § t, ~ ~ '" ::: ~"": S §- tJ ~1 -"''0 ]~ '§~ ~~ ".::i ·š ~ "''It ~Ì ~~ é· ~ at:: I~ I~ I~ I~ !¡;; i~ i~ ,~ 1'= :[ i-å. iE ''1) "- i ~. I·-=: I··~ ò: joO T --- ,; . " I. "-' I~ E Il~ .c . 01)- .- ~ .J: 'õ .5.5 I·... ~ _ 0 " . . _ 0. '.§ 'E 'j ë..at.;:; I· c""·~ 115 8 Ii o ¡J1 :9..0 oj) ~ - " o 0 ..... 1.':..8] ;::I ~ u oL .~ I'g~·~ .coL_ I~.s,g i~'~ ; 111~ ~ ,~~ :: Ë~' ~ o:J U 0 " . - I;:¡ ¡:; "E . ~ ~ '5 ';;; ~ 1'[8õ ~"§-5 ~~£ ;::I C::':-' 00;:: I U'~ ~ I,~ ;j c: I¡::j~ I i I Iii i'~~1 !I~------l ~ : 'Iij ¡ 1)"::::: I ~ I §.~ : -g I ~ ~~, I 'I' I~ I i ¡ I~ I Iii I I s ~~ i 5. I I ..0 ~ '1J 1) I ~ ,<;;;: t1 I ;;š 1 ~ ~ ~I : ;~ g : .Ë ~.,g t:: ¡.,g 8. I ~~B~] I~ ê : ~&]'§J: I 11:; ~ I j.~ U ~~:;' I ~ .~ ~ ]. I ~g]~g ¡tis '5 c:: II ~ ~"O o';¡ ~ § '[ ~ § ~ g ~ ,<;;;: i~ 8 - : I ~1:..š] I':'] '] ~ I ~£~i] of': ~ ~ ~ ~ - g ~ ~'Ë ~ I] ] ~~~==~~.I I'~. ~ ~ .~ ,g.ê ~ ~ ¡..; . - i P ~ () ~... <1.1 Îli'~ I"" .~ ~ 0] ~ ! ~ Õ 8 ¡: æ ¡: ~ ~ 1< ò: j .3 I I I ~_____ !I I,~ ~.~ ¢1~ I ~ ~ ~ .5 [ ~:g .ê 5 =5.~ 1'- ~ Ü "'0 ~ 1 I.Š ~ ~ t § .~ IE~ ~~ Is:; .g<.E"'8IÆ3t I c: ~ g.~ I~] I .~::ê:'~ ....8 ~~~.~ 01.1 ¡l·g g:g ~ ~ 1.9 1}:::: v g, .~ I ~ $; ~ "B ~ I~ § C::.- ~ .g 1¡11~ I i! ;: '§ ~ v: ¿] i § ~ ª g.~ ;:; ri IÜ<1.l0=~~Q)·.c 10 1:i (.).:- ~ o:J"::::::'::: 'é~§~-3G'::"~ I c.. ~ .- 0 t::".~ t.;.;; ~5~'~~8:g] j~~~~8.~] -..--....---..-....--.....-....-.---. ..¡ 8.~ ~ B ~ ~ .c ~ ~ ~ 8~ ~ ~ ~.s bÌ ~:; .5 .g~;g ~a.È 'cOg] .coo,", .... ... ~ £:Ë5 E 'B'~ § ·é·~ ~ c..uc:: ~'aj~ .~ ~ ,Æ "'0 ;::I 5 . e""" o ~.¡¡¡ -g~~ ~ O.,VJ B -~ Ü ~ ~,~ o,S 8: ..J 0. 0. '" .. ª '" .~ :is g Ii ] = Q .. .c ~ ; ~ '13 u = ;¡; e 5."d g ~:£ I~ .s 5 IQ o~ I ~ .i~ ~ e~ 0. 0 ~ ~ ~t:' gp e '5 '5 :§ , ~.E~ ! : ~.. ~;.; ,.:: '. '¡;j ~ a ~~g';§ :E f..J·~ '"' 0001= "" ~ "3 e" ~ ~- i I j I] i~ Ie" I~ i I I II] 50 ~ c " 'r. ~ .~.~ .~ [,5- .2 .Ë s. .: 1_ ~ c I ¥ ~-5 (.) 0 <n C'- " ~]~ ~ - ~ .'l'J (.) I~;~{~ 0.."" .55 ! ¡Iii 0-00 i~~ ~ ~ ~ . ~.g:~ ¡UH I 12 I§. I~ I ! I 1 nnnn , , I gi I .cl !t ~. 12 ~ it I~: 1]1 :;1 -~ ~ il~H ,.~~~~ ---- -- -- --- - - j~j~ -" --- '" .. .. ..: .. .. ¡.. " .. ..: .. z .. z .. o~ ~ ~ .~ -<." .§ ~; ~ ~~ ð ~ ~ ] -""'" r ,..¡" ;:: ~ ~ ~ ~ § § ::E u .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :5 .~ ~ s: .ê ~ ~ 1:iß~::: " .S ~ " \ ~ ] ~ '" ..; .... --_._~ i , n. ~ ._" I ~ ':; "" ~ il C':: C'::..o c,-.o I .§ § ~ ~ ~ ] æ 0 -,~ 0 ~ .9- '§ .g -g § ~ I ~_.9 -g -:;g ~ i~ "'8 ~ ~ ~ .È ~ '~i ~~''5i~~š*r:H U!!~ i~I' -g ~ § .~ E æ ë ] ~ ~ .§" ['~ ~ - 0 u vi 0'::- EI ~ 0 0"'0 - ¡.., ~I ~Æ~~t~~ .~ :€ ,.g ~ ~ ..§ ~I ~ ~ ~ 1).s ~ [)I §"'O 0'"'5; ~ '$"'0 ~ ~ ~ § '~'~..9 !~ l~1 ~':~~iAl ¡-¡ 2 ;.. 'D t::: ¿-':' ~ j ..~ -~~.~_.~--~-~ I i I I ! i I --------l I "" .~ g. ~ " '" ~ ¡: '" -è' '" o:¡ .. ,\¡ ~ ... § ... § ~ '" .... " ,) ~ i ; 'i M U ~ .n ~ 0.. 1~,~ (~;;; 1:2 ~~ i-¡--i - ~-=-~- --T¡ n_ 1= =5 l.t ë ..§ .¡¡~' â § ~ ~ .~ I g ~ I ~ ¡:::::.5 I ;;... ~ e ~ ~I :g -9 ~ "'Ocl .D V ~ .~ ~ I ~ -s I - ~~I ~ g I l[H.! ~ ~: ¡I¿. ~~~~I: 'ë; l !.~ ,'§ '0 .. ~Ë ~ g¡,~:ij ìij CO V1 e:';;;¡~ 0 u ~~§E! ;25~ iP- 5 :: ~ .~ '[ i d :::.s.s I c l: ~ E,"] ~!~ ~ 8 ~ ~ 6 .. :;;.::'í:: ~ ¡j CJJ j ~ e~g~I~%~~ ,(l) 8 .~ ~ § 18 ~ ~ ~ I~" * ... ~ ~ ~ I] ] '§. ~ iF:; ; ~ s] ¡oS B B ~ i ~ ~ .~~.ê~i'~]~~ ¡,5 p. ~ ~ < I~ .; ~ § li~ ~ ~ ~ ~tl~]ft ~ j ê -5 ·H I ~ ~"7 ] ì ¡¡ ~ .~ -C ~ ~ II 8 8.2 ~ ¡ ~ I] ~ Q ~"" 0 " s 0 ¡-a U i ~I' r .I~ Cð ~ L__~ ~ = ~ ' I_- I e: I .,g I - B V1 >. ~ i Ie':: -g 1(......-; tí d ã ¢:: r.S ;; ~ '" .~ ~ !j ~""§ ! ¡;; -š .~.~ .9 ~ ~ e.:. I~!:: ' .~HH ~!~.!""~ ~, = .5 ~ ì g:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ § ~ ~.~"8 ~ I] ~ rJ1 ~ .= I ~ ~ ~:: -a ~ ~.~ gdJ ~ 5 ~ ] ~ e & I.", ~ ¡¡ ~ Ž ;;:'~ -iJi.j '" õ t¡ ;; ~ .É: ~ = = q,J ã'r'I"'O~~ loc~c: ~..8-;:::c ê~ Q,) 0' IX 1-;; § §'~:: ¡g ~ 0 ¿ .::" ~ ~.",.;J ,," e .:: i Q I ~ -s t¡ ~,~ !.9 ~ ~ .~ § hi § ~ .~ ~ ... e [ Z -5 u. ~~ § l'g.g g.;:¡ ~ s. ~ "'0.<1].8 c::: 'j C o ,:1 Q )5 ~'-=.5·';¡ ~ ~ ~"S~ ~ ~ __ã .~ o.s ~ U _ ¡.¡ '': - .::¡ -s ¡: 0"" ~ - ~ ~ ,,~ .8 -g ~ .:.:: o( ¡.¡ I 0 5 t¡.;; ~ '" §' ~ ~ .' .g -iJ;;: ~ .:: ~"" o ,.¡ 'ª.9¡¡;;§ :Ë-¡;:]'§.g~~so .§~§ o ... 1 ~ _"".c U '" ~ ~ -'" ~ ~ -;:: 0 ,,~ o..¡; E ..c ~. = 1''* g.:! 1;; ~ I"" -iJ '6 )ð " -;:; '- ~ ~ .g ~.E s .>:: Q,) '" 0 CT-" ~..9 I Õ ~." ~ " .~ 0 z¡ "u ""'~ ~ ... i ~ ~ ". ~ § I,r~ -¡¡ ri " ~ ~ ~l':§"å ~. H ~ IS 6 .g ª g 11 ~ I~, n·:g ~ % -; .5 ~ ~ -:;- '. ~ I . f;t;< ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ê ~' d. ~ ~ ~ ~] §'; ~ § ê.g ?!' ~ = ¡.¡ ,;: 0 '" ¡.... ~ ~";¡ ",.È 0. ¡¡.'" ~ 2 ¡¡ .!! .;J -õ ... ;§ I ~ E s § ~ ~ '§ ~ ~; ·n ~ ~ ~.ê â ~ ~ "å ~ ~ 15Ë'¿)13Jj~;::"~-s~g¡¡5e.:~.s;~13 ~ 1š 1 ~ ~ 5- ~'j§ 0 g ¡j ê ¡j ~ ~ 8' 5 2! 9"" ~ ~ .!! ¡... ,..:¡ Ie.: ~ 6. 6. -1í ~ 8 2' ~ '8 :¡¡ ~ ~ g ~ 0 g ¡¡ i'i ~ I I~- -. - .--' - '" " 0. ~ e.: ;; 0 '5i ~.a U~ 6' g , _ ..... ('I; on ~ == ~ :;<'~' I i ::: ..='0= 1 i .... c.. Q ~.- I I ~ 'ü ~.!: t I Co I':: ~ =.:..:: :!: I I Co ; ~ ~.~ ~ I I < ~'OIX~I" 113 I.", ~~ &~.I! ! 11 -t: ~ Ë glZ e.: = æ e ~i ~u~6j I Ik- ¡. : § I I~ 1 1= I I~ I I·g I'i 1'1! ¡ ~ - -. I ~ ~ ~ :8 : ~ ::: I.", I ~ t I ~ .. ., i~ IL ~ i'* I ~ ," ~ Ii It:'~ I'" ~~! 2 I~ ~_L-_ ,) ", . I t: t· .!! ~ ... ~ ~ æ: '"ª~ ~~, ~-E .!:!J,,~ ~1 .¡¡'" ",<> ~<> ='" '~~.. ~~ '" .. ....;: .S; "" I \¡'" ..:o:,#: ~§- I ~~l ! . .. I 8~ ~ ~ L " .c ~ .£ ~ 0. ~ " ~ t: " 0. ·r '¡:;J w:.¡ "ª '5 CT ~ -r--'--~T-~ ! I" ~ ." "" 'i; ~ .;; '5~ t ~:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .§~ ~ ~~ ~ "::: ¡a 5.S: .t::¡ iE~ S i ~ E ~ ::: ~ ~.~ ~ è ~ ~ Ë~~ ~t ~'t~ ~ ~ ~ ~:.t: 'S¡ ~ ~t6JI~] '"' I..... CIÔ __-1_~.,.,.____.__.~... ..... :g õ 0. .", § ~ " :E " .", .~ " ~ o " -s " !~ i'3 II~ OJ, l,š I] ,~ ,~ [.Ii I,,~ e Ii. S I'a 8 II ~b !;J .~"~ I~ ~ OD ¡~ î£ I~ ~~ 15 .' ~.~ ~ .g',;-š ,ge~~ .9 E ¡;'§ ~ 8 15.~ IJ.} IJ.} 1) (l) 1J"c.o"'O i~·š=3~ i~ ~ 8 ~ 1'- ~.::: Z ~--L. ~ " ,j ¡¡ 1J' "§ o ...¡ @ .!! ~ , I I i>. 11}' " ~ o Z ¿ UJ UJ I"'¡ I; I-=: I ~ o UJ UJ ...¡ ~ Õ 5 .", ¡:: 'S CT ~ ~ ¡;; ~ ~ ~ 8 o ¡z I i I I I . 1_·1:< 1~1 ì ~ ~ i~ ~ lj~î 1m '§~~ I ~ 5'.% ,~ ~ " I~d 6 .~ s- t58 '"' _1'::_~ Ii --r--- I'! 5 ~ ~ i ';E.E _~ I~ ~ ~ ,~ I ~ Q ~ ~ 1'1j~ ~ ~ ~ Ê g I C':I C':I c.. ~ ~~: .= II Q ~ t:: < ~ õ ~ e .cQ.... ~ ~:;~ ~. ~ ·Ë ~ ~ (j' ,§ b ~. ~ ~ ~j-§ I~~' e. ~ j E I;¿õ~ ~~] .::= ~..s .... '" ,5.8~ ~~~j ~~~~s~~ c.....o' fJJ 0 ~ 0 ~:;;~].g ~ 0] c..--a t:: 0 "'0 ~ : ~.5 E ~ ~ "'0 C':I Yo ~ ~ 0- .~ -: ~ ~ [:ê ~ ::I C':I ~..;.::.-.!2fI v [~]ª~ g ~ ~~"Ë~~~] :;ob~';:2:;:9 ].~~~g]g ~~oJj-;¡:::fJJU .~ 8 g 5 ¡::: ~ ~ ~g.šê:f~~ - ~: ~ ·0 '7 o UJ UJ ...¡ " õ 5 .". (.\ " 1J' 0.. ,¡, ~ , , , ~ 'j 1J' ~ ~ E <: I~ 1__- r- .9 CJJ .ã ~:~ ri õ'Qv.... E.. 2 ~-S -Š~~.~ .9 ::;: ~ 0.. :5~~§ & ~ ã ~ (/J "E'o S .§ æg~..s õ...š ~'~ ] ,§ -~.; 8~~.š .§ ~ ~.~ :g 8 ~ :3 ~ .;f fi 8- ~.g~5 Q tJ') 0..;.. ~.9 .9 ~ ]~]-g I ~ ~" .~ ~ ~ a (/J .... -- C':I ~ 'l) "'0 '1) oE.æ~ .", ~ 'S CT ~ ....; '" - I' .~ .;,¿ \.7. ~~?;; 1£2 T~~ ';1 " "0 Õ -= " ~ = .~ .s = E Q 0 ~ ""~ -a. ]2 ë .~ ~ :; þJ)~~ ~·Ë ~ ~ ~~ Ë ~ e.~ § i ~ ~ u·~ -g£~~ CIS r/).2.§ ~ io~ ; ë ;]~ e ~ 8 ~ o ~ (O:j = u '6'.0 ~ ~ ..... e,,¡ tOO - = ..... c "3 !.~SS3 :gV1~~ui ~ :Ê~~ ~ .š! ~ o 23 j æ ~ .[ ~ a .. ..... ~ êS .~ ~.s~ ~ .Ë ¡.... .... 'II: = .S '" '" '" rJ.J .... = 'ª = = .S "'.... .. = ~ ~ è '.~ .~ ~ t' ~I '" õ:;; ~ ~I tI) c c::::: ::: e~ ¡ ~;g eo; 50", ~ ¡ .~ ~ f~ II E g" æ.g] 5 § ez:: .sJ::'~~ = .= Q ~ g 2 ~ ~ 6 ~ ~.~ g ~ u~ ~ [~]~ ..::d~ ~ ~~#~ Q ~ .... ;2.,s~", ~~ ~ ~~~êí~ 1: .~ i i~ ~ -: ã g. š¡ ë i]] ~ & ¡;;o. r....' ~ I"'" - ~ ~ ~ ~ I.~ ~ ~~ = = I(/ Q'Uo. ~.S ì§b'o]'E ~ ~ l:g &~ ~ i ~ I~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~!~ :~-~J-~ ~ ! ê ~ ·ËI = :~ ~.; ~i ~ t:~ ....!:I¡"O Q.¡ CIS Q,lc.~ < ~ ~ ~ ..¡·S Q.¡ ~ .. ~I go .â "0 ~-i~ CIJ:'= CIS ;1 ~ ~ e 01 '" = 5-.;1 ~ ð ~4 ~___I ~ õ ~. c· ~ ~ ." ~ ~ ~ ..§~ s §- ~-:: ~-E .~,,~ ~7 ~~ ~~ '§~ ~~ ~~ ".. '5 ~ ~~ ~~ ð'~ ¡ í 1'1 it I" I~ I~ ." i~ I~ I"" IT :.i-~-~~ ---;~I-- ----'11;' =3 ~ ----;- I,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ,~§~~c ] ~ ~ .- ~ ~ ~ I ! 1) Š 0 ~~ i:; ~ 1) ~ ~ :; ., '-.~ æ ~ .s' æ .- _~ ~ ~ ~ "0 0 ~ ]~g~ ~ : 0 ~ u ã ~ I !.s -g ~.~.§ ë ð"O ~¿ .,g u 0 I~ 2 -æ ~ ª E~ -=@¡;'"5 :: ~ ~ ]~ ~ ö1I ~ -a.;íJ 0 'l) 15 : 'l) ~ ~~ I § .§.~ ~.; (g -= 0 :2 ~'''''~;¡ ø '" ~ ¡.g ~ -E. ~ ~ e : [ ~ :; ] ~ ~, ,g .: :.8 ö:.ð S ~ * ]·1 ~ ~ '§ * 0 ~ ~ ~;g~ ê ~ ~ g ~ .9 ê~~ ~ ~ :== ~ ;¡~g,c: 0 0 ~ c.. :J "0 0,...... ~ "0 ¡ ~ §. -5 ~]'å 1ñ '3.5 ë ~ ~ : ~ § ~ ~ .01 !"O ª i ~:; ~ ~ ~ [ ~ 5 ¡:: ~ ~§ [ .š ] õi i:å ':; ~ .5 -; ~] òJj 15 ~ å'J ~ ... 0.; ~ ~ 8 ~! i~ ~ n l.~ ~ ]]!] ~ ; ~ ~';g"O'~ ~ ~i ,0 g 15 ~ E :J E" ~ ~ 15 0 ~ </J ~ Q 5 Ë ~ -5 ê ] '"' ~ , ¡ ~" "0. ~;, ,:,::: ~o ; _ '0 ~8~~~] ~ -g~ ~:J~ ~~e~-= ~ ~ ~ :~ ~ ~ ·õ.o~ ~ 51 0. -§J~ ~ ~.2 ~ 2.2 t1 ~ ~ ~ .š &; ] I' .L> '" ..... - c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~:: ~ -::':; .f3 :g I';; ~~::~8tA' ,; .....¡-- ""-..., __"._~,_,Þ - _ I';; ~ :.š '5 ; ð g g'~ :;; ; g ~ .g :Ë ÕÎJ ~ .~ ..; ~ g 5 ~ ,.g I] 'C ~ E -g 0:: B ~'/ ~ ~ §" .~ 8 g, ~.9 ~ ~ ¿¡ ~1:g É' ~ 1"8 e ~ î å'~ ~ ~.g ,.g s ö ~ ti~] "E.3 -= 8" g ~I ~ :.ë .s :<; 0. - ! ) '... - :J l":$.... I,? 0 . ~ c ë ~ c;.. ~ ~ ~ 0 :E - ~ -d 151 f;; e- ~E ~ 5'~ 13 ~ u........ I ~ -"3 </J..2 'l) C == "0 -.J:: 0 - _,~ . :: v (,¡:.¡ "" "'''''~2 _U~'l)_~O~C:J-~~OEòJjC~-j ~;<~.~§~i ~ ~~5~~g¡~~~~:2'æ~~5o~§ I 0 ¡:: u.g V1 '¡;;.E;:3 0 Ë ~ ;? ª ~ 'p .å ~ ~o~ Eo ~ 9 8. ri' 8. -go ~.~ S i~ ~ ~ -:.a ~ '1:. 8.J:: 0 0 - '" - ..., ~ ........ 0 ..... I i~ ~ r-< 0 ¡.... </J.... ~ f-< VJ 0..:::] C!: 13 ¡"rJ.5 >- U ¡.¡.:¡ rfJ < < t¡:j [- 8 < ,I I ~ I 1 I I I i I i I I I -'~"--~--'----- " -= :c .~,P E ~ 1:1i ,~ .§ ] ·t, ~ - "'~ "0 ~ ~ g § ~ off § 0"0-= ~~~ .~ e.~ ·f ~ g] ,Y.,:! :Ë j ~ .. .§:2 ~ u S -:3 '~Ê ~.ffi ~ .~ ~ ;~~ -=~ c [; '"d § ~ :9 "E :; c .5 g ~ 8 ,2 ~ ~.;'~'g ~~I g: i E ~ ~ ]: ~ g Eo .8 ~ ~¡ - .,s u ii, -= '-. ~ E] 'g ] ~I '5=:S 0.0 ~ .,g ~i ,'; ~ ,5 ,5 :2 '5! co ~ ê'5 g~: ~ .9 ~ ~ -d .J:: 13î .:2 ~ fii 8..~ ~ .~~. :ʧ-e§g.]~ E-VJ::;u~[-¡:¡::: . " 'I -----1 I I I 1 1 i ~!~~.š ~~~.s~ .~.§ ~ ~ Æ 5 ~ 1) ~ E ;:''f ræu..¡ 0 o!::_ '::: :§ ~.::§.~ V1 0 V ~-:::: 'l) OJ) ;.. ~.~ E'5 0 :: ~ .§. Ë ~ '§.] '$~1.6''§ It"¡ :u ~ "0 E ~ ,§ ~ ~-g -5~;8~, ~ 5~ 1)':: E § ~ ~-5 g~ge[i ~ ~ '[ ~ .5 .~. ,þ .;:: 1) ~"E 0.. .~ J1 ::: : ~ ] ~.~ ~ ~ [.~ o :::I I-< ~ U * g~ ð.~ß g ¡:¡::: - 0 c: ~ ...;¡O.E;SJ3...;¡ 51 ~ c o u o Z I i I"C 1= 11 I~ c ; ~ .$1 ~ I .. ~ ~ 0.. .. "' '5 ~ '~Ë " Q :a .~ ~ ~ ô~~ I --------11,¡:; == '" 'g "C = '" :È -¡ g I~ '" ~ "E ,5 E , ~ ~ ~ Ë :_~.a~g.-o :.~ g ~ ~"E : !f-~~ ~~~ ;~~"fi~~õ i 0.. ~.~ 0.'Õ' ~.) '1) C "0 E ~'õ' I: -5 ~ Ë ~ 9- ..s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :-£ ~ ~ ã ~:€ 1~~~e'É)$ ¡ ~:.a ~ 12 ;"'§ !E-á~'~ 6-8- IË~fi§]§ 1-5.J:: E ~ 0 ~ Ili~!i]! ~ ;"'."'0 v ¡:: 0 § ~ ~ -a.'~ 2 1ñ ;; 'Õ'..§ ~ [} . 1,5 §. ~ã ~ ~ .g i.~ ~ ~õ ~ E'ª !~ ~.š ~ ~~ ~ g. I~ 13 13" 1~ ! '" 0 c ~ c ~~ ~]~ -~ ,~.~~ ""8.5 t¡ t! '" 0 ~ ~~O=- .£~~ ~ ~ _0.. P.- ..., u '" w'-" :g'!ã ~ ~sª~ ~'"d¡:: - c: g,So-= ~ ~ co'§ ~..c.:: ] ~ ~'ã ª õ ~ _ [} e 0 <.n 1) .- ã ~ ~ a .' ~'ê' ë õ.,.g~.~~:5~g ec:::~.~ :::1]-="3 ~;~~~~~:ê~ ~o b Õ ~ ';::;::..c §O'OO] 2ð ~~, S§~~E8.g,E J1 ~ .~ ~ Ë i ~ ~ .,; ~ 0 E ê gi.2 ~.- 0 ã § ~ ~ ~Iª ].~ ~ o I-< 0 (/) 01 " E 1- I-< 'l) f-< "0 t:: '@ 0..... :~:ÖEè~E]2 I Ë ~ ~ š ¡:: ~ 'ª ~ "2 E § ~ g. '§ -= 0 ~'õ' -Ë. ~ ~] ,~ -2'] ~ ~ .Ê-=CQ'"é::8o:9~-S >: f I If :::¡ 3: ~ :¡ ~ Õ .5 o ;;¡: o '"' '"' -' ~ Õ .5 ] 'S g- o:: ~ 51 c " I~ '0 ." o Z I~ Iª I§ c o " o Z ~ ~ ~ c :3 o z ¡~ i~ Ii:¿¡; I" ¡,;¡ ì~ II:;: 1'- ~ I~ I" I~ I'¡¡ I~ .~ .~:¡I.~ ... '- .~ ~ ~ ~-=-i o "'J':'. ... " ~ '" .. ~ ._--_._"'.,~---~- --------.--....--- .- ! " .:: ... ii '- ~ <;; '" "" I§ jj " ~ 0.. .9 .2 õ 0.. ~.~ "'~ ~ '-2 .g~ ~] :r: ¡j 8] 'EVi o " os o N '~ c ~ '6 :; o c. ~ o ;g ~ '" '§ " 1 ó:: ,..: N " -5 c ¡; ~ '~ I~ " ~ ~ 0.. 00 N --~_.- .J '''} ,..... : I) on U " gp 0.. i) '""Î c; ', ( ..7. - - (.~p j~ll....! LI~~lf ¡ I .¡:j ~ :¡; I '"0 S ~.~ ~ .~ ~ Eï5..i:::1vi I g. e ~o!~.§ ~ ~ ] ~ I.f' ~ I ] ~ .~ é: I ~ Ë =3 .. u .- I g ~ c I "" OJ) ~ ;: 1M"" ..0: I Q,I = (/¡ U 0 ê <t; ¡¡, 'C E ~ t (U ~j 8.~ë~!'t~ ~ IOCJ:::.Ei..c::~ 1-0 ..... Õ öJ)1¡;;" ~ t; =-. =... U·~ ; 1£ 1) -o...~~oE .s ; ~ .§ .Š i~ ~ g fI.I ...... ~ 8..: §..:::: c ë ~~ 1) li'¡¡;'~ ..... vi-ci Ë ; ~ ~ ~ § ~ ~ ,~ ë ~ 8 ~ :e 'B ~ vi ~ [ ð .~ ~ § :.[ -= 1) - = _~a~,~§ ]'€~i .... ~ I tl ~ ~.~ 'ª ~ -: § ~ t.š ~ - - ~ 'ëjëi5~~.s:§ ~ m~~ of .~.< §.; ~ ~ ~ rl ~ ..:: 0- ,t::o..c:~ =- ~g.i6L~ ]]-6'~ .,....¡ c.':: .¡; I ~ -; '"' ..., ct - 'II: c " I-..c ;::¡ .2 !'J: .g I = i .;; .~ ~ !~ :9 - -- .S: I ~ Co. :: i 0 g e ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ]~!§-;; ;~~ § ~ i :s ] ~ ¡.5 .::: E- .::: f-< U .... I ;; ] =1 ~ E:§ ~ ~ I t t~ ~ .. S=- 5 ~ =.... r.F.J 5 .¡!J 5 = = Qì 0 5 .::: 5 ;.. o~ ~ ~I g t' ~ 5 .. .. o~ ~~ d = ~ .s ..2~ ,.Q OJ ~ 0 ¡..,..;¡ I U ~ :a = Qì ~ ~ -< ~ = .. = .. ... 'S 0" .. ~ Q Z Q ~ ~ ..¡ '- c ., .. "Eo = .. .. ~ 1-- , ...... ~ ... ~., = v.¡ 0 bti .. ="'0 =1 Q., 0 Q,I ï:; I:º ~.; ~I .... "'I ... ~ Q"'.. ñ ~ ~ ~ == .§ Q.= ..~Iõ. ~] ~.-;!O ~ ~ ë §! o = 5 ".Q¡ ~8~5j , --~--- t· ~ ~ " ~ ~~ ~-al ~~ ~~~ <I ~'" ]~ i §....; I ~¡U! 5~ ~'" Q::%- "&~ e'~ I~~ !..s g i] 5- I'!~ ;j] ¡.~2 tv: <U i ~ ~.:d"E I ~ § -: '5 Ill,! ~ ,..".- i'.) '.9 'g. g. § i] ~ ~ ~ I~ ~~. E I"" .¡¡ "0 " !:;~ ~.g l~jgJ ¡, , , , ---+---, i c: -g 0" ' ! ~--;;;î I~ ~ f1 [~s I" 0 0 I~'~ ã I~ ;~ 1~2.W i ~ ~ ~ 0"'01- ~õ~ ~~§ ~."Q 11J .~ '¥'~) 1~~1 , ~';¡.9 í t:: -- ~ li~ ;, ~ .~.~ ~ i I-< V..c 10."'0 _ I] ~ g i ~ ~ ~ i d :5..!: _,_l~--~--~- I I , IV) i~ i~ ," 18 :-;:, If 10 ',," I;:] iC':l ¡Õ 15 .~ gf 0,- "0 1].'5 ~~ 15. ~ c õ :' .g t.£ j~-š o ""0 .- 0 c ~ ~ e, 6~ g~ OM" 0..0:" --" .~ ~ ~ ~ ¡<;I tí -= g'J:.ë .~ ~ '§ C':I ;::1:'= c:;;:o o oZ õ.:!ì< 'ê':§ ~ 0.- 0 -š~~ IU~,,¡:: !ú '';:; 0. g 5 Õ ...;¡:-E~ , 1"0 I~ Ilj " I·t i.~ :..0 "" i~'~ I' ~ æ ~ " o " ¡:.ë:'::: I" "0 1:9 ¥ I tï- ¡rJJ 5t I ~ " '" ~ I~ I =¡ il ..., .¡; = ~ "'0 ~ .. -.; ~ 1= 'C 1-..:: '''' IE 't; = c U .. .!:! = ï: ~ " .g ~ " o U ,Oil .§ o o " " § -e ~ is " Vi '" .~ .~:~ t: ~.5 .~ ~ ¿ Iß ~~ ~ " ~ " 8 o Z 10 !z i ¡ I I i~ ¡- I~ .., :.....! i fì lð i... IC/';¡, i "': I~ I Qi ¡e;; !~ I-§) Ig l~~, oÖ " 'û I;:: " I'" ~ I" :ã t ~I'~ " I"" .~ 1M 0 I~I~ '" It; oj ;: liS 1=1 ;.., > ! tit; .S .. 'E ... = IV; i~1 ~ '" = " I.~ I~j . ¡;a c OJ) U ~ oj -¡;¡ u ... ~ ---- " .. 2 = .. ¡o., C; ",. 15 ¡§. o -¡; > " "'0 "'0 -¡; <.:: " " ~ OJ) "'0 ~ 1,1 .... EP <8 " '" " " " i~ .~ '5 ~ OJ) oj ~I~ e.~ ., " " "'0 .D :; " 0 ¡¡ '" i II ~ 0:1 r--rT I I 1 I II I I rl I I 'JO U " "" " '" I I I I o "' o o ~ ¡o.,¡ ¡¡j! ... .s ~ .. ~ ;:; .. z ,= c ., ;: Ë¡ =, 81 -¡;¡ ... .. = .. c; ~ o o ~ ~ ~ "- o ~ o Ii I~ ~~ ~ 1 ~ ¡;¡ Q. c ~ ..:.: I 11111 I I § II ,~ l_L~ '-J~ J:¡ ,C; ,.7 (.~~ '. 1:2 '·'V ~ .!E: M =It: = Q ..... ~ ~ ~ rJ:1 "'"" = Q ~ = ~ ¡., ~ I è' = = = uJ3 ~ ~ ..... ...... "0 = = ~ ~ = §:= <8 ~ o Q ~ ¡., Q ~ :: ~' ¡h '" t: Q :: ~~ :: ~ Q'::: ~-E ,~.~ ~1 ~~ ~'" '§~ ~"Ë ...¡¡ ,5 ~ ¡¡'" ~=t ... Q ~~ ð'~ .ë ..... ~ - .t:J. = ~ ~ ~ ... .,. :: " !'i~-:--rT Ii ~ i I Ii = ~ ¡,~ ]~i I I ë ~ § I Ij j!1 I ] ~ "d C I E 1: ~ I 1- '-¡1j "C : ¡j '6, I ~ '5 ~ 'g I ~~ ë]1 1'~¡¡:B'I! "0 a.. U·;::: = Q...... C I ~ ~ ~ Ê I I VJ _ 0 ·-1 ë ~'~ 8.\ C ,) "":'5! '1) E .. õ-5 , E t ¡<!"ôl : Q VJ 0 '1) I u .~~ § ë ~ ~ v.1 I~ë~~ \'_:;' s " CJ ,,~ ;::.1 1-0 i 8: ~ I~ ~; .s -;; ~~ '" ..:.: .- 0 I \~O~= i~ ;~ i ~ i,' .¡ I ~ ~ I I = ~Ir"- I I 0 ~~ e S¡ e ~I =..c rFl..c ~'~I ~z § ~I' o '" U ~ .::0:: = o 0 ou ~~ .. 0'" ~ ~ . e 1~8 :E ~ ~ I U Þ<i :ö = ~ ~ ~ < ] ,§ .~ .,. ~ :: .. ~ ... .. .. " '"' .~ 1:: " -;:¡ " .. .. '" ..::: '¿; ~. .,. .. ~ ~ .,. " ~ :: ~ " \,¡ ~ ... " 'S '"' ." ~ ~ '"' .,. :: " .,. {J " ~ :: .. .. ... ~ " ..::: :¡ = .. E .. .. .; Q" .. " ¡:¡ z 3 ]1 ~ '~I i a ! j~ ~~_ il 1- .. .. ..~:I 1= VJ Q ,~ .. = "C = ;1 .~ ~,~ '5 e 'f ~ ;.] ~ ~~~=:~ I Q.,~ .. cE = ~:s ~..:a I-E~ë§'~ I~ ð ] ~ ~l 1-- I~I I i ~I I 1'0 , I; I ,~ I I~ :! I ,5 ~ t ~ ~ ~ ....¡ .. 'S .5 ~ :E :: '" ~ ~ ~ .. ~ 'S tJ .~ ~ l:: '"' ~ 'S ~ ~ :! Q 5 Q .. I I Ii L-.l_~- iß I , I 1 : i I , I ! i I 1 . , I I ~ ! I" :ki ,-0 !] ;~ :~ r I] ". ¡~ I I~ 10 I..=: i~ I~ i;;", ,,c !"d I~ :~ I'~ ,': d~ I~ :z I I·~" § , IU~ I] ~ § 10 c: U Iz'~] :<.g ~ i] ~~ I'š·~ ~ i~ g.~ I ~.- c ¡],f'~ :"d C:.G I ã e] i ~ ~.§ !] ~ ~ I], ~§ : ~ e- E !...::: 0 E :.':::: g 0 I ¡::.- u !: 8 g i~ ~õ -- r-- ~ :ö .. ..:.: -¡¡ ~ "'" = .. - ~:---T II I I I 1 . I II I i II I I I : II , I !~ :1\.1 )] ," 1-" i13 11' i~ l'~ iE I ~ ¡§ 10 ¡u o 'Z I . , i i~ I. i'S .". !~ __,____.._----<"_~._.~_.._~.._.,__~w~_.__._.___ , ' ,----.-1' --~--·-~l " .9 ¡£ t: --g ì ~ e _, ~ â¡ ~ ]. gl ¡: .:9Ê %1 ~ ~ ;:I..... ~I '" ,~ 8 8.. ~I :: g.t:~ ~ ¡£ I ~ 'g ti ~ ~ § 'I '1) o..c t':! c: I .- ~ --; § 'g îl ~ ~ I vi .; ,§ ~ -::9 go] 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~II·~ ë ! t':! ~ ~ <'],.û.- ~ 0 it;; :¡: ~ t':! 0 ~ ~ ~ 1.2 e æ ~:g ~l'; § .'1) ..... "'t::I C ~ ,0 I'J ,- I ê ~j,g.,9 Ê i 2.ª" o _ ;:I "d '1) -_ ~ u I u ~ cr' '1) "0 0, 0.'- ~ Ë ~ ¡g·ø ~ 5 "[ I " ,c u . -101) Ilf~ ~ ~ ~~-:n e~~8S"i~5 1~.È .f' ~ ~..E ~ .§ ]~'~.~ ~ ~i§ 18 ~§]ð §:9 ~ ~.~ .§ .~ B ~ .8 ] .~ .~ ·ê'~ ß ~ .~ ~ Î~ ~ < ~ a: ~ ~ .::: I, " I ~~' i I·~,.~ : 1...... , ~ -š ~ § :~ ¡'§ E ~ ~ ¡ ~ ~ I _00)0,00 lv-t.¡..;~ ,;:: .J:: I ~B~~ Ig,;:~ ~~~~ It;·,,~~ 1--; ~ 0 - c:' ~ r- c: .:: 0 .-' 1-0 ,~:::: 0·';; "Ë~~~: &0'8. Ë~ ~ ~ i-: Ë ~~ I~ c: 0 00 0 ~ § 0 ¡:-2o -;..c: I~ ,~~ I.... ~ 0,$·,;; .;::: _ ~ I ~ 00 ,- u ¡ 0 Q t: - ¡i~~~~~ ~~~ ~]S~ !~§:§ c1 ~ 0 :::: '1) c: OJ)(.¡... \00.<:: .2:' " 1-''= C '';; ,-2 ~ ~ E ~ ~ § ~ ~ ;'~ B I.E ~ ä ~ I"::: 0 '1) C C. ;::. OJ) ~ c 0 <'] 1-0 <'] e U ¡.š .: ~~ ~ I~ .~' § . ~ š ~ -š II ~~ ~ ~ ~ ] .;¡; ,5..c: It<') 5 ~ I+::: A.~...... :;a 'ã 0 ~ o ~ ~'-5 g B -; S ~ ~ ti ~ ¡~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f; ~ i ~ ~,'3 ~ u C '1) .~ ,- I _ ..= .'::: u "t:I <u 0 1:.2.g:..:::- t':!o·é '.:.'§ .'55 f3 la~-s-q- ,-:: c:,·ü ¡j r- -g So ~ .~ .::!1tJ:::'5! ~ It} .G' ~.s !::: ~ ~ ~ ] :: 8 § ~ ë ~ ~ ~ ·¥>·ã .~ ~ I ~ ~ g š _ u 0....- _ 01} I 0 II-< II) t.¡..;'" 1- <'] 0 ., It.¥> ä.D ·S S ã § - P. E 0 ~ ~ .~.;:: ri :::: I-< ~ Q) g 0 - C S I ~ ,- - ~ I~'<:::: ~. ~ ~ P.õ.s;:¡t;; .t'~ 0 0;::(; § ~ !''= 5 gS I ~ -š :S ] 8 ~.§ æ:;: ;g .~ ,5 -š l.g ~ ~ ~ i.~ c: ~ - '-0 ë ~ -g C'~ ] "t:I ,S 5 '¡¡; OJ) Ë OJ) ~.;; § -£...... ,,--; Æ ã "'t::I.~ a õ i ~.;: V ~ ~ it ;::.1 0 E .- 'U .J:: !Ù Ie.. ~ I ) ,:::: ::: a_ C c U'J e C'::I 'E - - _ ~ ,.!. <'].- ! ~ 0 t: 'S ~ 8..g g g ª ~ :@2 ;g .~ g] [ I: * ~.ª ~ .;:: S 0·Õ' 00 t; tI):-= :;j t':I -¥~ -0 "'0 - u 0 2 '::" -'o'E_l-ou'1):::Ii-.> ...:¡: '0..c-'" ~ u '~o ~ ~ ~~~_. 0 ~ v; ~ t~_-=---õ·ü I ' : \ 1 1 1 ' I i \-0 1-0 1-0 1'0 !-o .~ ¡l I~ I'~ i.~ Ii I~ Ii !i Ii II \ i I I ' I 1---- --'--1- '1i "j' II~ -0 ~ --; ã ''::: 0 ,: .". 1 ~ L \;1 '2 ~ ~ e ·m c1 'g ,~ ~~ '1)':': <']1-0 ~~ E ë '- ... ˧ ~ï~ ~ u 'S (:) ¡fz <>::< I ...s ã I'~~ ~ I'€~ .¥> i 5 ~ So . 'I'~ -g "ô B Ë~ ~ ~ ~::õ 5 OJ) 1~.g§S ! ¡¡ 'š s~ I";::: 80 õo--;~ I'¥- t ·2 .9 'S.~ëË I~ g, E â3 .2] ~ 8 æ I ¡¡ 'i3 -0 a c: ;:1:-= 0 8..~.B G:: I~~ ~~ l~ .g ~ .~. , c: ~ <'] C '1) 0 :::I 'U I ~ ~]Š I~ ~ Ë gJ _ -0_ ·5 ~.;¡; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r I , .~ j, .~ Ii .8~ 5. ~ ~~~ -š ; = ttj "0.5 :: g~~.~ ~ 0I)~2.. i ~ "d ~.~ :E 1:a §.§ '5 ~ -5'ß~ '" \:È ~'§ 1J .~. 01) :! I H ! ~ ~ 15 .S' ~ufJ~8~ f ~ 'U~þ50"d Q. 0 ~2~'§eëã 4Z~~ .~ ~ ~ 8.£ êi §, .i: I'~ '" ~e ~ g t ~ '~ 1J ~ ~ =¡:l.¡tI)U"dI.U"d I'~~u ~~ ('.j ß~~ I~' !V !~ i~ ,IiI 8 '0 IZ I I~ I ~ _ 1_ 0 (š ~ l,c . v ~ --0 I:: ã 1..2 'U !I~ ~ u ._ I (i::ë I ~ g, '1:.0-;; ,c . ;:1'1) ",,: 1"'0 ~) I ¡¡ s !v.~ . 'I''':'::: ~ ~ ~:g.§ I~~ Ë I·;;; ~ "d ! vi' C) ~ It) ~ ~ I~ t} ~ i~ .Ë-.§ :t':I s.,::5 I~ I ) ;:: .5-5"'0 I ~ ~ ~ !v:; t:ü I~ ~ 5 " "'6h :a " -5 ë ~ ~ ~ ,: o u o ,: ~ '" ~ ~ ~ -5 ~ ~ ·3 E ",0 ,,0 I-<-q- '" ,: I.~~ I~]~ !~.~.g. I ~] ~ li;i~ - " ~ ~.§ :.9 §- ~ 10 o..c ¡~ bb ~ \ 0 ~ ~ I~ - t.¡..; :·B~ ~ I 'U :::I ".I -oo,c i ".) -5 6 i~:< g I~ !] ¡~ I ~, Ii 1'- ~ Ii ,,, 15 ,: :3 o z ¡j p .... o .€' ri ~ is '-0 jæ Ii!' 18: ,0 I'~ .~ ~ ¡i'J.!:! ~ 'ã - " .:: E :'é ~ !~ g I ~ of: It) g 'ß'õ:. II§~ o ° ' 0·- ....¡ 1ñ :U 1;! J I 'J3 I'" -- _£_--- --.- -.i ".; '¡ q q . l I . l"- e.::, ~ ~, 0.. ,v ,.7 :ì ;l..j::;; I ",. IGJ: . ...1~ ~. ~~ 11- .2" ~---r--~I- -- I ~ I I I ¡¡ I·~ ~_i f -æ ~: . ~ ~ '2 i I ~ .8 '§-¡ \ Q. ~ @l ! '~@i "0 Ol! U,- l i]Uli Q CJ E 10< , ø: § ii "0 S ~ 15 i ; ~ ~ É I :J ~ ·g·õi ~ ~~ ~i Ei ¡::~~: § ~ 8 ~: U'¡;j¡" 5 'I'''; ~ ~ ~ 5; t C'S f ~ -; ¡:9 ·~OO § ~I.fj ~ ]~Ii~, -=ci..J:; C. ;:0"'0 ~ ';3:Q I~ ~ 'S pi § ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ v ,- ~ i ~ ~ !§ b li~ .Z 'v '" '0 I~ " .~ 'v i:g IV !] I~ I ~." 1._" i~ ¡~ .'" I'; ~ i I~§ I~ I ~ ~ I~ :~] 0 I~ ~ ~ i] § ~ i ~ .~ :J i] ~ i~ ~~'"2 Ig 0..._ ,~ -,-- ... .. .. .·1 I = CIJ = b(j ~ g -g 'Ê: :9 ~·š ~i t: ¡:,:: '" .~I.", ~ ~ ~ ~!.~ c.~ ..t.S:¡3" ~ ] ~ë1I~ -t: ~ ë §! o = E;::¡ ~ 8 Ji ~ 1-" -i-- M ~ = .S '" '" ~ r:n - = 'ª = ~ '" 1= ~' I Q è'Q =-= = 5 = Q =-= r:n;ê '" - ... §ž ="d =~ Q '"' U ~ ..:.:: = Q Q QU :§~ '" Q- ~ ~ .Q = .... Q ~u :ë = ... '" ë .. Ei .. .. 's '" .. ¡:,:: Q Z Q ¡.,.¡ ¡.,.¡ ..J .... o '" .. Q. Ei '" >< ¡.,.¡ I.~ is 15 iE !O , u 10/) 11L :~! i..E ;: 1- S I ª 5 " 0 V u 6.5 10 V I g .c 1'- .", :~g I"' .¡;¡ ~ ~ ,~ ~ I ~.- .~ i:: ;..::: 'l) If- (/) -1 " i I II ì ..i-- I I ] ~I 0; E ,.", ~ § :~ .f ~ 10 ]~ i~ ~~ 1,- :1f~ 15 ~ ~ ~ !.~- ~ ""~ , .. ~ I ¡g ~ .~ ~ 11] t"'J..:::: ."'0 ¡.., ::: ~ I tl ~ ¡~ I J. 'II~~ -;0; '" I ~ ~ .::;: ~ _ v Q.; ~ 16~ ~-E L ¡O::-£¡ ð'~ 100 ~-_.......+---------- U >< :s = ~ c.. c.. -< ~ ! V " " 8 ã ~ V .", " I ! I ~ I oj, I·" oj ~ I l~ t I~ :~ I'~ " 1= 1:':1 i'r,"õ.. I ~ "'0 ¡i:§ ] .~ ª 'v-'" I~ -@¡ 1"3 "g I~ -B ¡ilJ ~~ ~ 'r.-" I~~ " " E "" " V ::: ~ " " ð § ~ o . ~ g"g .s ~ ~ :::" ~:-= E~ ~ ;;. ;:: OJ) - " o .- ""2 o " ~~ ;g Ê " u c.U .- Q 'å 8 ~ V 5 :;; ~'] ::Ef- bi! ~ I~ I¡ It;¡ i'" 1]- ! I I I] I~ Ie:< I CI ;¡; U3 :J " Õ 5 " " .9 15. o I~ .", Ii ,]1 I Ê ~ '5 .g 1.5 Æ ~ ~ I ~ ë "E .~ ,Ii,~ ]]~ ~ ~§] 11 ~ Jjj~' I ~ " ~ ~] : :~- ~~-~ I~ " 'j " 'õ ~ I~ ~ õ 8t ªJl ¡:: " ~:.= J=: . ·I··--·-T~--I·--l-:~ .- ¡ i I ~ I Ii I~j ¡ -;;. ~ I ~ 15. ¡ I ~¡ II ~ ¡ it ~ ~ "g~ e t<; ~ 0.. 0 tIJ - II ~ ~ ~ -.~,_..~ ~ ¿ ., ~ 11 e~ :g~j o.g, æ8 -g ~ ,G> ~ 0.. 8 :s! tï ¡,j ~ !I'~' ~o 8 ~ I'~ ~ ~ .5 ~ g 5 ¡:j I~~, ª ~ ~J[ B ~ ¡g t<; '1) 0 ]~ I~~ ]g ~ .g ~ ~ .5 ~ !-of.': ¿¡ï::: 00 ] ~ III =' ~ ~ ::9 ~ ~ [ "'O.f' I' g ~ ~ ~ i] ]. -5J 50 r: :'9 00 0 :Ê ~ B ~ tIJ '2 f-< z8 ¡§S \ . ~ ¡'ª t~ c _ '"' ", _ s::: 0:<::: .n ~ ,::: § i~ 8. õ e I V 5 ~ 5 ¡,5:~ ~ ~ 1.~J.~.g ~ ~~-5] ::: t,..¡ .S :2 t<; 0"0 =' .ff g'] ~ E g.s¡";; 1::1 O"VJ::: ~ '1)'- ~ tIJ ¡..,..c 1-< <µ,f-f- ! i 1 i I I I I~ I~) It¡ CI z ~ >. 0/) ~ ~ ~ ;;., o;¡ ~ c::. Z ¿ ~ µ, ""' -~ Õ 5 CI ;;¡: CI '" '" -' " õ íõ c '.5- r--~ --- I~ I':;; I" .", " .s g ~ ~ ¡;g I~ ,0 I~ IZ I I I I I ~.: I'~~ ~ ,,'" 5'.;) 1.9 ~ ;:: g. 'Eí is .~~ '§..@ c_ o.¡/) ('3::1 "'''0 J:: § C ::: ~~ ~~~ C 00 .f; 01).::: .~.~ _ ;::9 _ _ Ë ~ '5 '2 0 1) ~:: ~ ~ ~ ~ 'Q IB~ '111,~ .3~ ¡:t;:ë 8 _J=_~,_~_~, __~,~_,___~~_~,~_, ~ g- o:: . Q .8 15. o " " .S 15. C ~ .~ T ì I I~ I~ ~ > U U V -¡; .", o o -€ I~ ,0 I~ Q V Õ E e 0.. 0/) :d. " .~ '" OJ) ] ü ~ " .:: '¡j ~ U Õ 5 2 0.. oj¡ " ~ c. ~.q V - . 0 ~ .¡:: "c. 'g ~ Q-" Ë ~ 0- 'j " ""' .- ~ V 0 .~~ 15.~ o 0 - 0 c.", §-" ¡2¡ "''' ::I~ o 0 U 0 .~ e- -" " f-U ,~ ;1 Ei Ei o I~ ;jj Iª ~ I~ CI Ei oJ " ~ I'~ _ 5 -Jtl I ~I .r .. ~ ''¡:: ~ .~ ê ; ~ Ei 8 Ei o 10 z I~ i~1 ,- I~I !~I :'" I'll i~ !~l :; Ei t: o ,~ 17; :fi ~ Ü <oE V ·È E B " I~ 0/) " ~ c. 'É' .g: c. V " '" ð ,¿ ---- ,,; .~ '2 " ~ ~ ~ E: ~ ~ õ ~ "Ovi...c 1; 6h:g ",,,,, ._ ø 0 ~-§"51 o V ~ ¡s "0 E ¡ii1 ~~ ~ ':1 ~J ~] ~ ¡:: u p.. -ª .5) ~) i$ §'~ .g~ã ü'3 .~ .5 g" ~ .",.V "3::s:-E o " " ,.¡::;:: 0 ~ ~ U ~ .~.~ ~ -"-"v f-f-J:O 00 U V OJ) " 0.. " ~) ~ CI ;;¡: CI '" '" ""' " Õ 5 ] '5 C" ~ I~ I~ Ii " 'Ë .", o o -€ ~ o .P ~ " " ,'v , ..2; (.~~ , 1::2 ; '~~LJ ~ <:: ~ =II: = .S '" '" Q,> 00 ... = 'ª 0: Q,> .. ~ '" ,'0 f ~~:i =~ oo::ê "Ê 'aJ I Q,>Z ='0 =~ o OJ U ~ .:.:: = o 0 ou ~~ .. 0- ~ ~ ,Q = .... 0 Q,>U :E 0: ~ U ~ :a = Q,> Q" Q" -< ~ T--~--r i ,,~-~ : i,~ ~ ê~: =.g -g ~]~~ .~ ~ _II -E ~ :g ~ õ ~ "Š § .8 [~.g-5 Ë Ê :~I ~ ~ g ~ ~, QI ,8 0 I c:: ~ ~J ~ .8 Q.:;;1: ~ ~(I ë ;u~ "0 ]]Z~, ~ ·E ~ ~ c Õ OÌ¡ 'U ....: "0 OJJ ~ ~ (I : C.5 ~ "'P ~ = 1-0 1.1 .J::. ,: I-< ~ ~1::~-g1 ~ ~~'Ë~~ g.~~~ ¿ ~ &.zb1.'§] ct ë: § ~ .~ ~ §-] ~ S-.g "0 &. U·- 1-0 .~J ,.;:: ~ [ c.S '~I =~~E~ ~ ,~~-g{¡t;8 : .: §.~.~ ~ tí "": ~ .D ::J Il) ë ~.~ 8. ~ ~ '5 ~ ~ ~~ ~] S Ë ; ~.š .;:§ [~] ~ H ~~}j"ß e ~ §~I:;~~ ~g g ãæ)-ß [~ 8 .~ ~ 5 I ã Ê ~ g .~ ~ ~ ~ 2! -g.~ .' :; ~ ~ S;, E ë] E ~ t '; ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ CIS 1:':1.:::: .::: ~ I:':I.:!J ~ ~ E o...c Õ S :2 .S- J: § ~ ..a':; ~ -= ~ ';:¡ .8 .5 ¡..... .,g Il) Æ ~OO::J~ uff~~ou~S~~U.~ 'f "8 ~ þ': ~ 8. -g ] ~ Ë .~~,-= .:g ~ :Ê ~ õ ~ ~ ~]i~] ~ ~.~ ~ ~. ~ ~ g- ;, 8'~ ] ~ ,§ ~ ~ 11 Ë ~ ] ~ ';:Q 'E g ~ a ~ .š E ã..9 .~) ~ ~ ~ .E5~~~S:.2~t;;"3~v2§ ; ~ ~ ¡I'~ ~ .~ .š :g ~ ~ g æ] u ~ :> ~ .:!! ~.~ C, ~, u u ;.... ;.... 1:':1 ~ ¡: ... 0;: I',.c..c..s:::: ~ 0 Z" Zo ~L~ ~] u ..õ ;¡""'f-;f-;UU s::::_u-E ~ 8 ~ Z -T-- I I '" ., " 5 " .. .; ... " " ~ :z 6 '" '" ..¡ .... o '" " ï:.. e .. '" '" I~ !;.>-. ~. Ii'} f 1ií it; ¡o ° '1 z If] 6 :.:.¡ I~ :J I", '" lõ õ is -= I ., :i\ ~ ..~'I ~ g ~·Ë 'r::: ~.= Q,I .- C J = ~ :g t:"""::a ~~&:~~ ~~ .. ~ 8 j:-g è'-; 0 ~~Ëšz ~=ë'-= ~8JJo ~ 51 ~ c o u o Z "'" ~ r I~ j! ,,::t 15~~] ~ Co') ] 'õ ~ ~ J i I,~ ~ ~ ~ :~~ i~-§ -5.5 ~ ~ !~ -g ~ .~ ~ ~ I i~ ~ ~ i '- . I Ie"", " - ~~ Ll' Ili~ I~] ~ ... 0 ~ .- := ~.:; ~ ~ Ë Õ ,s"" 1"'2 ~. '" ~ !i 1]1 IJt ð'~ _~i~___"_~____ .~ I":: o ? " 'f;] ~ Q,j ¢J.¡ '" c ]'~ §~ u "'" u 0 j~ <;¡; --~,. T T' . T--I~------lT I '= ~ .' 1 ] ] .~ i ~ 'Ë ~ I' "'" "'" - § § .= I .9 .9 ~ i Of] ~ E ~ I E is 1) ~ ~ ~ - 0 .~ 'd" ] § 'S .~ on I ~ ,~~ ~] o ~ 0 ~ 0 -c~ â~ ~.g~ I~~. ·--:Š~~ ~~~ I~~ §:§ ~ E].g~] ~ . : ã :: ''ð. 1:: :; ] ~ g. ~ Ë ~ ~ i~~ ~~g g~§8.E~~· i~ 5h.9 ~~ g 5h~ 5'~ 5;:ë 1Ë~~B~~~.gÊ:~~:i I~ B B]~' ~ s ~] ~]- ~]: E ~ ~ g. ¡:: 0 ~ ~ ':; ~.~ 6.g ¿~=~~-B~~2"'1a""~5 1.5 'ß-~]] .S ~] ~ -B ,Š] ~ !"'ß g"ª:9 6"E g:c: ~ Þ ~.~.~ !'3 8 'š g 5 '3 8 .~"3 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ff.:2 ~ ::: - go.~ .: ~ ~,.¡:: 0 ~ I ~ -5 '2 ~.5 ~ oS"",: ~ ~ ~ ~ ::5 I~ ~ Š ~,~ ~ ~ Ë ~.g ~] : ::I Of] ilJ..c "0 ::I (I) E..c..c ;:I Q)- 8 E '3 ~g 8 s ~ ~ ~ 8 :; õ :E ~ ['§ -5J :Ê ~ 'g. '§ ~ :É'šj § f-;":::~N':::¡'-"':::~N¡""r-~U lu I'~ - 1::. : 8,=';; I 0. of: l- . ._ 0 :1.1;" ;;. I; ~ õ I'~ ~ £@ !~'[,§~ I~ 'U VJ ~ [æ.s.,g ~ i V). t:: - ~. :'~:§ §~ I ~'~,d ~ ¡'¡;j ~<;;; ~ i 5'~] ~ ¡:::.8 ~ ~ ~~ ~.g 'U .¡:::.._ 0 .¡: 'U..c::: OJJ ~'~ ~ ~ ~.:: 11 ~J ~ ~ '[,ª !~ ~ 'U 5 if/: .......s..c::: : co ~ ,_ a i '1J..c::: 0'" :]:s; E ~ i g g g"'8 ¡~"VJ"T _ 1 ;,..... f '= = 5 5 o " " .s = ;š .~ " ;È ° '1 ° '" 1= I~ I~ .s '" = o .. " .. '1:1 = .. I~ ," ¡... :~I "~í .i ~;l iQ It i~ 10 I" i = 1,- IE 11 Ii" 1 I.. h I IE I ~ '.fJ 10 ! ¡::.'!::: i~ :'~ § I (,I ¡..É..2:' I... i~'~ ~ ; ~~ I'~ ¡go,; _ I ¡: 1! 1_ !It) ¡:: .Q 1"'0' ~ : ~ ~ ~ I~' tii if I·~ .~ § ~ ¡ .... co; -<.S OJ) .Qt· __ ~ V) L~___ ~ ~ c g Ž i"O .~ So " '" u C o 01) C ';: ~ ~ " N ~ §-~ ]~aO .5J~] § ~ _ ~ ~.~ <;;; ~ t.E ~~ ~]~] ] .~ ; ~ ~~ '~ ~ ~ ~'§ ~ ~ .~ 8 .8 : s .E s g ,5 oŠ 'ã ~ ~ §'~.§ ~;::Io-<I)";13 8~~~~:S ~ E '§.~ ~ -< -5 t.E ãj VI~'tií .~~~~ ·§]]ë.8~-š s -B ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ Ê~~æ]~g ~ Ë Ë ~ .~ " ~ § 8 8 E ~o S '€ ,5.5 ~ ,ª Š §- ~.§.~ :] §.@ .g ] ] ~ ~ '~ ~ -B[J~;S~~;¡ .5æas~e] ------=--~,I---- '" Z " .c £ ~ 'E " ~ I..¿ "'" c ~ li,5 ~ .g 0. ¡ ~ § !,~ ~ I~ "'§ .§ í:g ~ - ~ t:: 'B ë 1:.1 vi:;:¡-;f !] j :~::i 1 r! ~ § '" ,5 §~ Ë ~ § r; ~ ,g,~ ~ '; ~ u '~ vi ~ ã 01· e. 5 u ~ '""''''0 ~ ~I~ :::J,~ ofj'¡;j vi ê ~ ,~ OJJ ~ ,- c..u 'U 'U § C ~ t:: ~ ~I:â £'~ p.~] ~ ~ E '~~ ~ I "; ~~r?; ';' e ~ ~ ~-S;] ~I,Š ~] g] § ] ~.5 1:: :s! <;;;[6' <I} ;¡ ~ g "'0 2~~~] ~~];;;~~~ ..:1t':1..:2.....U'J .ß.....~-õt::¡::¡:::..c .c..~ ;a.Ë ã 'UI~ § ].g],~ ;;. '1J :; grB ~I ~ ~:9 &:9 ] ~i ~'@J.g ~ ~ c"2 5~ g] 5:9 3~ &~.t::~û~: ~ ~ t; ~ g ~ ~ .,g,~ ~ .,g ~:E :2 .,g .,g ,:::UOUI-<l::OI-ZI-I-I-I- -'I~ I I I i i Ò I .- u - ~ '" Þð ~ 3,~ ~ ]~]~.; ].s ~ ~ '§ b"§~~~ c..~ :::: I-o-g 1-0 <I) ~ tl 'U ~ .Ëf E ~ ~ ~:s: .-.~ 0 ~'3 ~!5 5. ~,~-š~~ e § ~ ~ ,~ 8..~ c', ;::I-t: ?-Š~~ ~ ~ 0 :':I [¡j C' 2e-Se~ §~~~~ ã s ~ ~ :: :~~š~ ¡.., t':I :.1 w c E ~~] g o ~Q E 6h I~~~~.g :32.<~§ 1 1 i I I I I~ If ° Z 6 '" '" -' ,'" 1'2 i~ i I i I !~ I,g 18- '0>: I :E .. ..: .. Ii ~ -; 51 c -= ~ .S: .. c i5. = g 0 0 ... 0 -= Z " = " '2 ~ ~ '6 -§ :§. '2 ~ 0/) .~ ~ o ..c:~ ž~ '" - "Et8 ~1 ~i 8 - 0.<2 N N ---~.- .. .. =1 8i ] ~II] .~ = ~ ~ E u 0 I. Ë 0 " E E ~ 8 i ¡g Ë IE t8 :.9 E_ I; OJ) I~.~ I: ~ ii Ii ~ Co 1 " "0 ~ ]] ~ ~ ] I] g ...~: .~ ¡ ~ I~! ~ J .... !éll~ ~ I~ II ~ .Q ..:: M o:T o ~.L~~_~___~ ~__ _.._-~-----_. ---- ïiO a- U " ¡?J' 0. ,0 1~j~ . -Jš2 ~'v .~ ¿E: ~~~-~ --[~- -~ - -~ ---I ~----I ~- -----~ I" I ~ ..0 , - Õ 1) I :g B ,Ii' i I gp ~ j t @ ~ ~ 2 ~ U !@ ¿~ ~ ~ ~ .£ '5 0 :::: .~ 0 u .5 [ j ~ cb ri ~ ~ ã ~ 1J £] C:]? ~ fi .2 ~ ò ..::' E ~ ('I ë . c. .~ §- ~ E §,.otl c.. c~öl¡;:: E ~ = e u u ~~.~~ . c C': ~ -5 B U..;¿ 0..- V1 .§ ; £ ~ ] ~ 1Ž] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :E ~ B.!Ó g ~ II'~ ~ .g ~~ ~ ~ .~ I,g ~.s >.,';: ".I]": 5] ã -g ~ ~ ~ ~㣠~ ~ ~õ5öl¡ ~~ ~ Z IJ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ 11:8 ~ ~ ~ { .s: § ¡j " "'" I~ .!.! 0 B ~ '" , ~ § § S :' ~ '-' § ~ IJ .8 a : :§ ~ 'g g "ê i.~ ~ t8 .~ .~.] ] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ] -: ,; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i: ~";::3 5 §"O .2 ~ § '"'.... ::t ~ u ~ (11 V1 e :5i~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~] ~ B ~ ~] ~ ~ :~ ~ bi~ ~ ~ ~11 ~] ~ ~ B ~ 1-: -: -s ~.s.~ g..... ~ ä~ = ~~. ;,:, ~] ~ ~ ~ Ë ] "8 g ': ~ ~ § ë -; ~ ¡ ~ .~ .s] 6 ~ g:9 .g ~ ~ u V1 S .~ ~ b '§ .~ ~~ ~ .81 R ~ .~ š ~ ~ ~ i ~ B] § l~ ~ :g ~ U ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ l~ :J i ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ ¡;. .~ Ê '5 .g ~ § 6ï; E :s! ~ 8 E. 8 : 13 ð. ~ oS .D ~ 0 ~ g ~ I~ b ií ~ ~ g ~ ~ š] ;: -$:Ë .9 ~ g 5 õ §:; E ê :¡ u ¿: I 0 c:s 0. ~ 'I,) u .9 t: 1) tfJ 0 ~ ,;¡) {j v; .~.D ~...;:: ~ CJJ..... o iU 0 .D ~:-g.5 -g ~"O tfJ ~ ~ >. ~ ~ u c:: ~"'3 ¡¡; ;;.,.....:-2 «I ~] i$ li~, ~ bÏJO ü] ~ :.â ã]1 ã ~ 0. ~ .; .,g u ] ~:Ê ~] .:::: E- ~ .. g < ~ .5 E- Z ¡- E f-;[;E E-t <.=: ::2 ¡- ~E-t èê r-< < t-< , , , , 'I ,"'" I , 1T1· f.'II",' ~.I, ---~-----~--I~ '21' I I; ~ .. i I ~, ~ i ,~.ã' I' ¡ .~ (;,. E ~ ~i 1 l.g ~j ¡¡ ~.~ i ' I I;; ~ e § '9-! I ~ -£ - ~ ë ~ I t;" tn· ,9"'8-g Q."Efi ~"E-tl ..... ª,,, ~ oS .~ J! I~ ~'Z 1':;5 ~ l~ n Ij g ~ ~ ~ ~ ] §- ~ ë ~ ! I'~'Ë :E ii ~~' ~ . s ~ == E:t:1 I': 5]~ .D 0 ~ÕÍJ "t:S _ 8 '~I'] '§ ~ :J ~,] ~ .3 ª =c.S:.o~ õOJj;:;~ '''- J3' ~>: :~§.šl B~Et .c:~~ "E 0'" ..... ~.- 0' i:::;'- 1-0 0JjC'" c'3 0 0 (':I ¡¡ ~~ ~I ;;] ~ .s .§ ", a gj ~ ,~ :2 ~_;.::_ ..ooo,,",oü ë"?C~ t::1-o _~o<= :-:"'O-:E<UÙ.o~<:':I...c o-ê E ' ~ ~ I~.=: § -; 0:: 8"ß ~ C ~.; ~ ¿; . Q fI: 0 <u I ;;. U t.I: ..... !\) <:':I - (t '"0 ".).... '=':I C '"0 u ·ã ~ ~ i ~ .~ ~ .f' -: ; &.~ æ ~ ~ -ž.:~ ~ ë ~ ~:i !.~.;~] ~,g gp~ ~'"5;; 'g~-g œ f c "3 i 1-5 ~:;.;;¡ ,<;:: Vi ~ 0 .~ ~ '"0 ·2 0 E c....... a '" I (t ._ u '1) U -..c ru c..;r.¡ 1-0 c.. (/¡ E :~ CI:ì .3 ~ i i.e ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ :9 -B ~ t & ª i § 1:: 8 '" II I"~ u..9: E ::-', æ s a c....c ~ .;;; E (':I N ~ ] < <~ ~] 5;~' ~ ~ ~.5 ~ -: ~ ~ 1 :;a: ! c.. '; g.1 I ~ g :9 ] .¡= ~ .~ ~ E] ~ ~ -g '§ = 'I '= .- ..c I . tn..c =' "'0 ::: ,- '" 1-o1'U ¿ C "'0 0 E .S: ..c ~ ~ e. : ,.g "3 .::: ~ ¡; ~ '" A g '3 0Jj tn ~ il,-E 'ð~1 1š.~~~~ë·§~11~~,-~~·5 ~ '= c.. " I I'U .9 ~ ~.~.D ê";;;I"'O § ~jC'~ ~ ~.::: 00 I ~ <U I I.;: 1) 1-0 ] -B '" c "-, æ u ,r, gUll) 1) :; I ] ~ ¡::: <E f-< ~ :;:; -< ¡:::IVj .~ õ a ~ ¡:: a ~ : ~ I' I , , , , I " , ,,' ~ I ~ I' I ~! I ~ ",I! ì I "0'1 1<::: 2! I ~ I 0 í8 œ I~ .g oJ; ~ ~ 1100 bIJ I ~ ~ E g ~ u- = '-¡ I ~ ,g ~ I~ ~ ~ ~"tj 'S ~ ~ . a = fI: l~h:'3 1<;:::='-<:':I5.D-:) p'I 0..... I .".-!: -0...."'·" 1-0 -:;2~ e ..= = I] e ~o ~ c.:= õ ~ ~ C:' <:':I '''... '" = ,Q" 1 o.~ I ~ 0 -:] 9, ~ t ~ ~ 15 t 00 ..= ~ i ~ ~ == I ~ z :;; ¿ ~ ~ .;:,s a ..s ~~ ~ "" I I I~ - ,.... I.:: <t; ("1 - >t.;;. ? 0 E ~ ~ ~ ~~ ! ¡I]II! l,i¡'Î~ ,'{J~i,~] ~'~~~;~ e ~ Q I~; .š ~ ~ ~ I~ 0 ~:§ -:; '(; 8. ~ ,- ~f;:;;; o ~ Z .... '-' '" ... I u ~ ._;:: - :~ ~ ~ 9 ~ '~ U ~ I I.., I' ,..os -,.o0'~ ~ , gj ~ ~.E:= ~ ;... 0 ~ 1-0 !\) d = Q 1- ¡:;..¡;¡ ,_r;:rv......öO Q.o~2-:-B ~ = ~ "CI .~ ..c: Q) ~ !.s .~, ÞE,~ ~ ,51,_ <:':I a 1) ,5 ~ 1-0 00 ~ !<U e~~;, ,_~,o. ,.o<¿;jg.~.-_"'o=~ <:> U " !,,:-æ 0 _..:.: I..c: ~ ~ß 2 -= ... ,.Q ~ - i:í'õ1-o"ë3 12~~'~,~8 ~":"..9E~..9 ...^~ ... I'" ~~o~ "v - ~"~",,,~ ... ~ Q I E I'=!\)":':: ~ !.... ~ ~ ~ § 2 0 ~ .~ ~ bb~ ~ "t ~ I .s i ~ ~ ~ ~ I.¥. g .E ~ ~ ~ .~~, ë ~ ë ~ ~ = ë. i ¡ I!~ '5 ~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~ ê.5 ~ 'l) 1) § ~ ~ e ~ i <U !~ ~'~ ~ :9:Ë 0 z ~:9 "d ~.5 c ~~ ~ '" ~ I = 'l) _..c =' =' =' C> < 1î .'_~ ~ ~~ .os == U<:> ~ ¡' ;1 ~b: ..0';..11_ ~ ;~.š; ~ - -- ~ ~ = - ~ ......._ ,.. __C'_ ]~~~~] :E I ~I ~ 0 "E õ ~ ~ ~ f'..g ~ 5i ~.§ g ~ ~ ~ i ; I "'§ ~ § ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '5 ~ g ~ g ! I rni :J.9.ß .g 0 .s 'õ 5. S 8 o'~ ¿¡ ë; ~~ 1 il ----~--- '"I ..... ~ S ~J ~I ; g "t:S .~l-gl ,S- Co t ~'ëi .~ ~ 'S 7j .~ i I'" ~ ....- '"I ~ ~ :¿ ': ~i §"~~cS'ël 1-5];-;~1 I~ s: 5 §I~i '= c s:;=, ~ ~~~~~I I· I~í ¡~ I I'~ I I~¡.I :31 ~i , .,' I 'SI i 51 , _11 II~.;I! ~I QI..s ,~~ co loCI - _ ~l°·OO ~ ______~ u ~ :a = .. ~ ~ < I I] I 50 i¿¿ i ~ ~ = § , i ,... , " ~ '5 c:r ¿¿ § ~' is; E ." E Q ~ ~~ s ~ Q"" ~-f .~'."<;:) ~1 :5~ :g", '§ t-i ~~ ~~ '5 ~ ~~ ~~ Ô'~ ~ ¡; u ~ 'J ~ ~ ~ ¡; 0 " '-'= > " '" ..0 ~J~ " '" ~ ~ ~ ~ .E ] ~ .. 3 ~ '~ " " " " 0 " E " ~ .~j Š 8 ¡; 5 8 0 '" " '" .~ .L -0 0 = ~ 5-;:: " 2 ~ " - '" ~ ;; " õb ."" ,..: c, '" ;:: ù " ~, 0.. 1.~ ~ .5 (¡ § ~"B 12 g " = = 0 ... u l°..c I~ ~ I s ~ I ~ ;; i~]' It 15 ""~ ~ 0 = " 'B 'Ë " ~ ~ " ~] ~ "" .- '" g~ :.=: ~ u ~,5 ::Ou C':3 z ~ t]~ I I i~'iií !U :::: o:<:..c 1'- '1) - 1":'::- I\) !~ ~i i~ ~ ~ ''/'i. ~.g ! § a'¡;j ;:Z 12 .s i 6 ~.8 :!5..;) c 1_ "'0 0 ¡~ .~] il~ !1 ,0,= C 1-0 :~ ~ ~~ ~ Il) '" c.. ! ~.;: = e i~ :ê ~ ~ I § .~~~ 1.5 ~ ~ g i ~ ~ ~ .~b '..g ~ ~~ i'~ §~:g i~ '"a 42 e ----+- ~1 ] §J.g,~ ~ a 'ø .~] §:; ~~~o~ z æ: 'l)~ I!J ~~~!)~~ ~~~;~: ~]]¿;]~ ~.gg-E,~~ ='¡;j':: ¡:; = '" ~ ~ ~ ~ .s°-š Q~tE~~1J~ o..c _ 0 ::: 0 00 o..c ","'0.0 §;-Ë.~ 5 ~ ~NO 5¿-5 ~ ~ ~ .Š ] .5 Š.§2~8~ ~ .5 ~ -; ~ ê ~~~~~.s , 8-;"'0 o~ § 5"ü'¡;j"§ ~ o '-'=0 ~ "'O"ì;? 0 ~~EãE: £~~~.~~ I I ] 50 ¿¿ '" = ¡! II ¡!-g 1i 1'.=_'" - ¡,g I~ '~I~ I~ i~ IŠ]' i ~ ¡; ~ ~ ¡I l' 11]~ _ I § ë G' :.;: It; "'0"'0 I § ;] ã § ¡'f 1 gfJ § :: i ~ ~ ï: I § ¡ ~ I [~ I ~ :~ I~ ~ I~ ! ~ I~ 2 I~ i~ ~.~I .~ I 2 § '5 1° !~ ~ ~ IOÒ !,~ 0 _.-l_~___.__~_____~_,__r~_ M _~_~ ,G ,',7- (.~~ .1:2 ;..~~ ~ i ." e " :: ~~ ~~ "'"" ~~ ~ ~~ ~'" '§~"' "'""" c; ~ "",¡; ~"" 'S ~ ~§. ~~ ð'~ i i i~ , , I ~6 ~ ;;.., 0/) I~ " ~ ,'§ IV. ,- , ~ I~ 10 0 'z :<; " 18 ,Q 0 !~ ,~ itî1 IOJ i- !~ I.., I~ I~ " ,- Õ 10 5 ,~ 5 ,~ r- I ~ i ~ I ~ I r ) .9: .~] 1 IE ~li 8. I ê § ·~i .~ - <;!:: ,"" ~ ë. ~ ~ ¡ -¿ ! ·fiël·] ~ : ~ ~ i]-ª '" .;: EJ ~ II.;: 6i ~ ei C c:: C·- o~š~*~ ~ ¡¡: § .§,:~..0 ""c å <..oU '§ I~ ~ cu t,¡;, r/) 1- 'U v.¡:; §,š "?š ë ~'~ 5.., g t 5 ; ~ Æ ì~ ~ 5~ê~i~8 U ,~ ~ Ë I] :; ... ei e ~ i a ~ =~~~Iêr/) [~C~!o§ .~ 00 § ~!.s '':: 'f Õ ~!og ~ ~ ,~ :< i ~ ~ .Q. -= ci.j',?p æ Q. cO ~c ~ ';~i"':,~ '" ~ -I ~ " ...:0.:: ,- c C"'O " æ; 2. ~ .g.::::â ~ 'U I g 5.§ ~ I~~~ õ b N 'II: = .51 '" '" a; en -= I -ª = a; ~ :gi- n t' 0, = -Ei ~ ]1 ~~~ ~Ž 5'0 5~ o ... ~ =i~ o 0 °U ~~ .. 0- ~ ~ ..è 5, .... 0, a;U :ë = ... '" ë " ë " .. '= 0" " " Q Z 6 ¡.¡ ¡.¡ ...;¡ ... o '" " ë. ë .. '" ¡.¡ U ~ :a = a; Q. Q. -< ... ~ '- c-.! = v.¡ = bJ:I ,ë- ~ t '51' ~ rl'; ~ '- ~ ~"'''i''3 .. "" " ~I,= ~" '"I" Q.Cü ,,~,ãf .,g "" è'-¡'''' !;I} ,- ~ ~ ...:o.::~5§ æ; ; 5'~ ~ u J3 0' . r " " :"3 I~ !'Ë ,~ !] !§ I" '" !.~ 1<;;; "j ìl ¡~ '" 1'5 '" I" ,..0_ i~ .g ,_L_..:;.~... -¡r-· . I i I~ I~ 1"0 I~ !~ I~' ¡o ¡:¡i 18 Ie. I~ I;: I;: 18 Ii - ___m____m__ i ,"0 ¡.~ '" i'" !~ I·i ¡~ I~ !C':I Iii l::t 0 '"0 "0 '" 0 i.... C 11'~1 E _ o = - 0 ,0.. " I. _~_l~_~_~ r- rl--I iT I·· ¡ I I I I I I i Ii" ' I -: i ~ ~ I~ ~ 1- :.a '~ ~ o ~ ::: tS o = -= 0/) ::: ",.;¡; öb(IJ.g !~ ~ § I ~ ,.., 0. t-cl !I) 0 1- ~ .s '5J c ': i': II¡i~ "'0:.2"'0 I.~ ~:i :; 0 0 I 0"_ ~ ~,.2:- b II~JI ~.; ~ § ß g !(/)I.,)O .. ---,u I ..~~-- ~¡) = o '" .~ ';; " ~ "0 Õ ii .:< ~ ..... -= "0 " :s ~ 8 e. ~ " " s = 8 o z " " 0- i ·2 I ~ ~ I~ ~ I] B ~ I~!I) ~ I~ ~ ] '~ ¡~ ~ ~ § .2 !I) t: <::: ã. i g , ~ * § ~ I .~ I ~ !5. Co ',) 8 5. 'i,) ~..c.- I 0 ~::::;¿ § .S ~ 12 ~ B ~ ~I ~ ~ I ~ E -g ~ ~ gl .g '¿;5 , I~:; ,1! :;:. ; ~ ] ~ ~ 11 j ~ 1 ¡ ¡¡'j I~ j J~ I~]~~~ê~ I·;::: :;~ 1== oS c Ë ~ ::1 .... I'~ Ë I.ß g. ~ '- 0 _ ",..0 ¡,;, ~ . ~ -= 8.~ ¡j: 5 ~~-g 0.'= I~ 1 go :tl ¡: 'U 1;; °1"'0 "a ª' I] ,~ ~ ~ ~ 8. ~ ~I ~ "3 ~ 1 5 ] ~o..s::o..c"'O!5. I~.~ l..o..s:: II ~ ~ >!I) ~ ;, om 'h C ~ I ~ .B ] § 2::.ë ê' 0 '5 I..s:: ~ 0 d 1- '- f-< f-< U U ;: ~ "" !;;E ;;E I I;: I I U ¡" " "!~ , I' , ! I'" " ,. ~o~ ~ "'0 0:::...... .~.... d : i-g t; § Q ~ i ,.., ~ ~ ~ "'0 IÆ I~ ~~.ß ¡IO ó ?] : i g 111 .1! <>: '¡j.~ ~.~ ~ 1] ~ ..0 ,: - ~ ~ 0. ,- t: :-' 0. ..g Ii), I" u" Æ] S §~ ~ I ~ ~ ¡Ji ~ j I ~t~ ~ ~ :s 15 ~ ~~ ~~ I;: ~,~~~ ä - - I 0 ~ 1"(;..9 S tí::: .~ 1'[2. iSZ~.g..c: E' ~-=-ti 0::: -~ I,s;;~o>o ]'U'ãifjo. 0 .~ ~"A ~ I 0 "0 0 'U 0. =';: $.~==!5. I_C~''::~ "ª. oS ~ ~ ~ ~ oS 1"'0 ~ - C':I 'C ~, ~ u - ... I.~ ~ o~ ..9 Vi .... 0. :E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I] ~ E ~ ã '@ ~ ~!I) "'0 ~a ~>;;;~~.s g¡ 0" ,~180g .;;;eE~-= ~= I·~~ _ ~ ¡:. ..;.:: .." ~ ... d ee- :82~~~~~~8~ ~~ '''a 1-g~:D~~g¡!a~b[ <¡~ i ~ .g I ~ "'0 >¡;; - "'0 C. 'U "0 .s I.;::¡ en 'U C; :: ¡] ~ ~ ~:: .~ ~-'ð ~ ~ ~ ~ ';j .2 § I ~ '; ~ ~ ~ e ~ s. § -;; ~ ~ .§ .~~u.~o ! E OJJ ~ e õíJ. ~ I-< ~ r¡ C ~ 'U ~ ;; _ ' 8.5 ø - CI"'O IU 0 ,- 'U 0"'0 E ,~~ 8~Š~~og~~~.~¡.~~ I~ .g ..s.È t;:: ë..s.~ fJ !a ~ ~ ~ cl:: ,5 +-._U_.M . ] 'S 0- ~ i 1 i I", ¡~ I~ Ig ,W I , 11 I;; "0 ~ :5 'S , 0- I~ 0- !~ I~ I I -f I I~ , E ;8 '"0 ,= I'" i~' 11 ,;;.-. " Ii i] ·5 . c. Ii E '" I:~ l__ '" i~ ~ IE-< :~ I, L__m I;>; Ii I .Š 1"0 I§ 1= ¡J ~ .'!i I~ I~ I~ I~ o 1) ¡.õj) 3: I;¿ B I-Z:~ Ie. - ,<>:< I. E'. ,g, ië '" = 'fi = ¿ '" u ë IU ~ " 8 " 0 1j t¡ .3~ ~ I~ 115 I~ ,~ I~ II~ g¡, 0/)" .S :.a I~] I~,.g 1- - o V I ~.ª 0::: "..0 ~ " I~~ .~ = I ~.~ I~.~ i ~..t:: 1',= :q I ~ ¡¡ - ~ o '" e.= ~ 0/) ".~ ¡~~ ì I] I'~ I~ I I I I IJ I~I ~ .> O.QI ~ : Iii I~ ~, Ii I~I J;..___j~. _L !:;/j ~ :§ 'S ::¡ I i I I I I I i I I I .' II j~ I II ¡¡ I ¡I ~..l__J 1 ,') u " 0/) " "" " . 'i~ (. .." 12 :.·~'U ~..l::: ~I~~--;;-- , I oS '" M ,'II:: = .S '" '" ~ 00 ... = Q ~ 01 ~ '" ~ '" ,"0 è'g 01':= 6 ;; 6] =..c 00.:= c ~ I _..5! 0 I ~- .s ] § I ~ !A -2 I ë § 'õ.¡ Æ -:::':1 ! lJi "0 b( ~ '1:1 ~ C ~ _ rI:I'- '" U &~ Ë~! c:> Cj S 1-0 ¡ .. ."", S.:E:: ~:;: 8 ·~I -g<s~~; ~ tI.I C E ~ 'Z ·ß 'õ c b.().:o: c. ë ;~.š etG'õ = ~ 8 ~ U"6lJ ~ ~ - ~ ~ v. ;ë~'§ .S- ~ E 2 .~ 1.1.1..2 t': ~ ~ < ~ ~g. ~ '$~ oo :: ~ -c '8. ~ <:> - ~ ~ -" ~ u "' OJ) '" 0.. ;; õ ~ oo ë " e .. '" .. -= 'ã) 'g. ë z ~ § ~'I ~ u ~I ¿ ~ = ¡.¡ Q Q ¡.¡ n i . ~ ~ I ~ ðl ¡.¡ : ..c I 01 I E-< I ~ II ë ~~ 2; ..~J "'0 =="O.~ [ ¡:Q ~.~ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~~I Q..~ ..~ ~ ] ~i-;I .:.: <:> e §, æ; ~ e:=1 ~ðc7.~ --I i I i=.. § €' I ¡z '''' õ: ¡;; I~ ." ¡;; " ~ "'" ioo ~ §- IC>. "",, I~ ~-E ,,,, , .. .~.~ '" ~1 " z ~~ I c "'~ <:> ,,~ ::.... oo '§~ .. " c ~~ " ;: e c ",,:; e <:> ::.. Q os ~ I~ -"'''' ~f ~~ i~ i:-. ~ 'OJ t;i:: c:: f ~. "" , .7. ø~ 1;2 ';.'~'v " .J.~ I >. .. ~ 5 5 = uoo ~ f'- .... ..... "0 = = ~ ~ 5 §:§ <U ~ Q Q .c ~ .. Q ~ ::: t, ~ ~ ö:; E ~ § go, ~§- .g~ ~~ ~I :5~ ~~ "", '~ f'i ~~ '" ~ ...:;: ".-; '5 ~ .:.:"" ~Î ~~ i;, ~ t;i:: ~ :: : : = Q .... f'- f'- ~ 00 ..... = Q ~ ~ ~ .. ~ e,; ..... ~ - .c ~ ~ :;:! <> .., ... § ~ ,~ "~ ... ~ ¡¡ ~ "" ~ .~ 1:: <> .::: ~ .. t¡ .::: ~ .6" ... ... i:1 ~ ~ .. ?-. ;:: ~ " ~ <; is ;:¡ .~ .. .:: '" ... § ... {¡ .. .::: '" ::: ... ... .., ~ .. .::: Ii: t ~ ~ t<J ... ... is .5 ~ .,,= '" .;¡ .... ~ ... ~ ~ .. <; is ~ .~ ~ .:: '" <; is ~ ~ J ~·HI--r = :2 I :Ê ,g I ~ ~ ~I ~ ~o ~'II ~ "";:; . ë. ~2 e .:::~ :; I:J) ~ ~! Q,I = ...... ~'5 Ê ~ §-1S Ë ~ ~~§~ "0 I. ~'s = ~ 0 VJ ~ i .g.~, ~ ~~ ~ 8 '" õ.¡; 8 t' ~ '"S U·~ ~ Ë - ~~;1. ; Ë ~ ~ : '~i.i5] ~! ',c 8 ~' ; .~ <:: g. -=ò.. c.. "0 j .~~ ~ .~ ~ " ~ .... 'II: = .:: '" '" Q> r.n ... = -ª <:II Q> ., Q:I I I", i~ :õ '-" II~ :D' .J::; I ~ I~ I ~ I~ I ~ 11 i Ii. i ~ '0 Ii 'I i~-- -X---I~ ~- --- õ '<~ d ;:I I ....~, Cij . ~ 01) I ~Ëg~j'11~~ ' E '-' <1)'.. V'. ._ j ~] -a ~.~ .~ i I ~ .2 ..š ~¡ ~II ~ ~ =1 '...é '....] 1) -; .... c . i I £ ~ ;~§ ~ ~ .'[, E¡ E,g ~ 2 ~I=§ g §. ~I '§' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~] = Q. ~):}, '!J ¢" 1) <1) ...... B .,g -g -: :§ ~ '2"' 5 .S "0 -;;;.co~~Q.~~ = .- ] --: ~.~ ~.;; tí JI fjii~1~J -6 ~ .!:: t1 ~ ~ ; = "3 Ei vs.¡,wc.ða.s!:: ¡ ~ ~,~'~ ~I ~g. ~, - 8 .~ ~ '~.g .: t § Q,I "'O°1J-Z3°58 ~ æ~-S-g~ g.~)§ 81 .§ ~ g ~ ~ "E ~ ~ Q cr..... _ "'0 :;'"1 v 0 c: ~ ~ ~ ~5~~ ð' > fi >,C ". =.. Q Q,I - -I I 'Cj ~.!: ~ ::1 . ,- Q,I = (J = I.¡¡ ~ ~ go=: ël] - ~ -g ~ ~ g g. !II .c.§-.,~~.=~.~ ~ I .:< " 8 § " I æ; § 8";:: 'g I ~U"'O'" = -- ;§, ! /- :51 I I ~ IQ ]1 E ! ~ oS.~ I~ ~ "0 S I.. ~ ; i I!:~ "~] 1111 t I~ :. ~ = I;::J OJJ U ~ 8 t.s ~" ~-g ¡¡ '" ~ g' ~ ~ .:: '~,~:.a ;::::: .. 11')- IU~ (J ~ ö';; I"", t.' ~ E .D o cÏ5....; 01 ~ ." ~ " ~ ! :; "" 1) õ ~ t' <:II 5 5 J3 ~ '" ~ =·c 135 5[;1;1 <:> Q> U ¡: .:c = <:> ~ <:> Q> r¡ <.J .... Q> :ë <:II E-< I U ~ :a = Q> c.. c.. -< ., = " 8 " .. ,. r:' " ~ ¡::¡ '1 ¡::¡ ~ ~ ... ... " ., " ë.. 8 '" " ~ ~.---_.--.------ T ì I I I I I i I ~ ti ." Õ -" ti ~ ~> "" 13 ::2 ~ 8 '0. ~ ~ 8 8 8 o z I ! i I I~ I~ ~ Q ~ I~ I' I." Ii I , I I I I,v 0. o " È '" on c ~ '5 ¡:Q 11 ~ ~ 8 1- ~; " .~ ~ ,8 ] ~ " 5h 'I ~ ::: :.a ~ c ".J ª:-g ~~~~ ~ ê <3 ê 1:: <2 t <1) .š [&3 ¢: 0/> ..; . -~---·---·---r···-·-- - i ·----~I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I ~ I~ '~ ~ '~ I.j ~ -§'" " ~ ~ I~> È' ~ 1"'8 13 .g I"'§ "2 ; 18 i if J I § § 18 '~ ~ Iii ;Z ----- I-~-I ! i I I I I , I I I I I~ ;;", If ~> "" ff' " ~ ~ Q 0 0 Z ~ ,~ 6 53 w..J 0 j '" ~ '" ..J '"' 0 õ .:: .:: ." ~ '5 0- ~ ] '5 0- ~ ] g ~ B u <: > :I: ." ti ~ 8 0. ..§ II') ~ Ci) ~. c::I H, ,5'~ ~] ~ ~!i;..c :::;;. Bi::'~~ ° ~ v~ (;8. 1J ~ ~ ð ¡:: ~ g on ~ u 5 c ~ ,§ -p~ -s~. ~o Q. ... ö ~ 1) B ... ';: go 01J~ ~ '¡;$..c: ~c::It~ ~..ê¡;;.~ ,g g - ~ ~ c§ ~ 'in"ª~: ~ ª ~>§ ~ ,g § §~ l~ i ë 8 g';.<ø ~ .: ~ :J Z .5 ~;:J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .§ :J. . aj. ëi.. 0. <: ... "" .~ š ti C 114 U ti ::J' 0. ì~-Ir-'----n-i~~ TI~ I-;--U¡-Tr----¡.--- I '= j I I ! : II ! ~ I ¡ I I ~ ~~I Ii I I I I i I I I ~ ~li I I' ~ I I '''' .ge! [ II '6 1]- -g¡ji II I ~ I:;; ooH ~,I, ! Ii",; ~ .~ ~ r I I I I I ~ §-"'6 Ë ~I I i I I I ~ I ~ ~]!i I I' II 'I I ~" = cS. 0 - i ! II ~ : :¡ §.~ [' [' 1 I 11 I ~ ~~ ;'1' I I I i .~ ~ " ... e _ . I l;g £ ê 'õ; § 'õ I I I . ~s 18 .~ ~ ~ i ~ i I I ~ Ie" § ~ ~~I~ I 'I ~ '~ ~ .So - E ~:-5 1-£ I',¡;,~ ~,' .~ lJ).2 s...!..:.:: I~ ;:. ::: M ~ ]~I~ [' If. liif :¡t §-.5 ]'I~ : ~ V) S .~ ] .~ ~ I~ II I ~ I~ õ _ J ~ I ~ ~ ~ I~ I i Ii 1 j II ì IJ --j ¡ ~'" I~ ~ , e; ; i I ~ ~ ~ ~ § I~·g n I ë ~ I I ~ ~~ rt ~ ~ õ ~ ~ e ~ ~ I I 'Ë ~ ~] ee~ Ii: OJ) g, " - =" I - -" ~ ~L§ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ I ~ .~ 8~ ~g, g ~ ~.s ....= .~ §.. I' I I'~ 2:' bí;.~ .g s. 1) ..9 ~ ] aJ t~ ~ I : .Ê 5' g E ~ 0 ~ ....:'.... c e= " I ~8~J~-g a~ê~6 - ~ Q 11l)'- C":I <.E ,;) 1):: ;,..... e ~ :z II I ~:::gE °5-=~"2 o _ Q , t;;; c c. Š .Š a... 8~, e u.. r..;¡ I i;;'a~ 5 0. ~,§J';;~§ .:c g r..;¡ I I ' I:Ë'S-.g n· 5 .a.S ~ u ~ ~ ~ '~ [I ~ [~ ~ ~ ~~~, ~ ~ ~ C/} I ~ ~ ~ ~ 'j 0 I,: g"£ § ~ ; i i g ~ g ~ ~ "5 0 11) <1)'- ~ ~ I~, I ~~~S ~ ~n~¡ll ~ c: ~...... c...... c.. <1)";:1 oj r..;¡.Q I I 0 .~ 0 6t 0 ~ ],~ ',5 :: ': iË3 § .g ] '.5 ~ ~.2 gp ~ ça :ë ! -; I 0 - ~ ~ § 0' ,§> ~ g ] ~ ~ = 0 ~ ~'~ ~ v ~ I = I i3 ti -5 -0 -:.J e ~ j,;_~ I ;,¡.,;..:: 1.1 C e ~ ,S: I~ ~ ~~' ~ , =1 j~ u ¡ .5:1 I::: i l~~~~ lit I~~'" I ~ :~ ~·Š ~i '''I ' = ~ ~~~~I!~ I! ] Ii I!e~ c......¿g- I~ '" I ..â:=¡ è'";I~ ;~ ~ I~ I~ ~~˧ .~ ~ g ê'~ i § I] I ... u J5 0l..!:: I·e I if.!:!! ~ I!I 'I ~ .0 ¡;¡ I· ~ I>. '= ~J~ e I'" I '" ~ 1._ ¡¡ ,i :;1' jj .ê- I ~ I_~ i¡ ~8" IE; i t ,~ ,~ ¡ ë E Ilj./! ~¡¡; I.~ ~ . E ~ ! > I'~ ~ §; I ¡¡ c I ~II 1 ~ 5fj II: ~ ~ I~ ð ~ tí ~ <11 i~I.~.~11 Ii I~ J~ ,~~ægê ji:~~J ô~oò 9&_ ., t ,G ,.7. 1 .- fJE2 1:2 'I. .'I..J <:: '" t· .!! ~ ~ ~ " " ~~ j~ ~.5 ~1 ~~ "'.... '§~ ~~ ..,.:; "'.. os ~ f~· I ~iL 8~ __.L_ , --t- I i e '~ [] = ~ ~ fj ¡,~ ~ ~ C. I ö.fJ t: ~ :a G' ! 1..0 ~ ~ N C 1- ~.; :ª 'D '~ ~.g ~'E I!~ ] ~ j ~ . '" ] ~ M ~ I'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~'_,§~ is..o~~"'3~' I~ ,1)!.;:: =' <I'J"'O ,~ ;J ~ .g .8 ~ ~ !~ 0 0 1 1.-: I I"" ~ I'~ I~ ... I I! i 1~1 i~- I~ = co .:: I ¡¡ > 1<;; c ::: ~ ü t 12 ~ ~I~ Q:: ~ .. ã ~I,~ ~ ~ Q.I'~ ,Q.I ~ 0 ..Q"= 0 O~ ê = '" = co ... ~ on e :.§ S .0 IE " ¡~ ____m_,'____~.__..., , . I i I ~ I I ~ I~ I~I :~ : I"':': 1"'0 <Ii I ~ í ~·Ë ,.D ).;:.g 12 1.~.5 I__""~¡¡ II! ~ ~ õ " ¡'..c-->ie· 1.5 ~ :; 1 ~ I' ~ ~ i ~ =3§ I ~ ¡~ I:·~ I¡ I~ I:~ ~ 1 )~ I§.g E. . "" I ~~ : i 1~8 E !~ ! j [---Ρ.~~~ 1- I~ I:~ ~~. is I·~ Š t I~ Iri ~ ~ ~ I~ i~~E~.. lei';:;; . 01, ~ I g g..§ ~~ I'Ð I'~ 8] ê 11..0 OfJ ,,0 1) 0.. ·E ~: ~i . .š .~ ~~ .§ .~ 1,5 I~ ~ ; ~ I,~ ['I ~.~ i ~ I~ ~ =' .D..c: ~ u II~~ I§~g.~~~ " U 11..0 c...c .,"''- -0 ~:~~,c~ I ::3 1) I E.;c: ~ g¡ B '¿¡; ~~ I~~ ~g ~~ 8~ ~~~-5:a6 -0-= õ.8§.$:!~¡.r.¡ I ~ ~ I ~ .Š·Ë og ~ ::J Ik] .j'~",t! :fi j_ I"~ I I 1 I~ I~ I~ I~ .Z I I I I I. i I I I ~ i II iI I . ê"~ I ~ I lo:d~ i..2 I ~~,:£ ~ -= j.~ I J:i .¡¡¡ ¡:g : I~ ~ I.Ë ¡.§ /i ~ [] If Ii! I; 1% .... =' Iv I~ l,.g;: !~~ E Isg 125 '" L"" !""S I::: s.! I:: _ _~_ --L_ 1 1 i /)Ij Ie i~ :õ.. i'lJ i~ :! u " 011 " "" '0- I", 1-6 l'ã '.0 i'O i~ 15 I.š :¡:: I~ I; :;3 I,~ ...c if-< " i 1- i~ i~ 10 I~ 15 '" ìõ 13 l-g II i-¡; e ¡.S 18- I I I ~---.J ,'~~ (.~'" 12 ~jlJ ~:s::: T-~-~I-~-----j 1--- b I I § ~ .æ ~ : : i g B ] ~I " ~ ~ ::11 ~. ~ ~ ¢::o: ê .s =- ~~II ë;::s ! .~ ~ ¡ ~ :ê ~ : ~ ~ i § .Wf ~'C ~ ~ I '.... ç: Q.. CIJ =c 1 õ o:à ~, Q ~ Ë ~ j ~ æ ~J;;, , Ä: § ~i If) -5 IJ "t:S ¡.. u·;:: Ii] ~ t! & : ~ ] .i I' II ·w;' ~ J.! ë~·;;O g~<I)-:: CIJ þJJ~."_ ~i, I .c_.c - - d æ;-..é' ;::;;¡~~.99 ë t ~ 4: I I.¿ .§ ~ ~ fi ~ ~ = :¡ B ~ I I~ ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ § I ) ~.~.~ .5 .E~~ ~ ~ c-"i:a_:1 11-0,.:.:::1-0 cr./]°e- ~ ¡.. C :3 I :3 \":I ~ c:I 1.1 Olj.... .... '-OOE~I' g~] EO:g§"§: ~ ]: 11.1 ~ ~ ~.2 § .~ c:I ~ ~;I f!li iilft~ 1; .;;; f?, I -- 1-0 'J;.>o 1J 0 -~ :g:t; t§fJ::c I ~ .~ ~ i I õ ~ 'f,í Á E u'].~ Kj o - .;::·=~t~iA:cg.g :> ~ I~ ì I ~ u E ~ G' g "B.;;: <I) ~:; 1 1:.2 u .£ ~ I-o..c: !:) e:.E .D ¡.....,5C/J 0 Zo..¡..... L~I¡' I I í Is I : I I] * ~ I i I~;, e I -c'" Ii I~~ § J Š II I I~; 00. CoiIi t Iii g ~ ~ ~ I .~ ! I 1-- i ~I ~ Iii I~ ~ ~ = ~ Z !.§J § .§ U J. Q I i Iii] t ¡:¡ ,I 1'0":- gi¡ ~ i I , I; ~ ~I i II 1 II~ 11 ... e I: I ~§§ ea ,æ þí t ~ ~! i : c :;;'E ~ ~ I· I§~ê ~ I I ~I i 8 ~ ~ Eo< r----1 ~I ~~-~--- ~ "..J~II ..... = ~ Q :t: i :s 1!. § 1:'Ë el I = .- Q. I. ~ 1.1 I ~ .~:: 'S ~.81 1- ~ Q. 1::" 0'.:1 "'I -< ~1:~=':c( I~ §-.g >.:: ~.. ¡IZ! -;;:=;cq ,...: '" e c .c Isae,gc ~ ð ~ 0]1 I I 1<;;1 I r --'.sl ¡- i 1-;' '. I i ~ ,I,~." I i =! ~. 1 ., §! I~, I ~I' I~ I~' i~ I-§¡ I Æ - I'~ IH ~I I-ª ~ "t:S I ~ ~ I: I ~ ;;; " . C II ~ "'~.~ i ._ .- ;:I II) ~I ß !. B .~ea 1-.0 IßI~ :!,___ M :f : = .S '" '" QJ ~ - = 'ª C<I QJ " ¡x¡ ff i~ ::: ~ s; § " ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~Î ~-E .~._~ ~1 :5~ .5: .!:'" "'-== f~L' I 0';]' I ~~ è ... i:i~ -1 ~ ~ ~ ;¡; 'õ " I ~ ~ c o " Õ E o ct ,,.; Q Z ¿ u¡ ¡;¡¡ ...J ~ õ .s " C .9 Õ. Q 'r I ì 1 i I 1 I I ¡ I , 1 I I ¡ I I II I I i I II I j i I I I I I i ¡ I ! I el ", " .:: ., .. ~ " ~ ~ ;1 ~I i: !;: = " loa I~ I~ I~I I!~ I; ¡ /jl¡l; -= f!) ~ ~ ~ l.šJ -5 I ê ~ ~ ~~ I·~ ·"'~:li .CIJ ~ ~ ã Ö~;£ i I I I I 1 i ~ ¡ -. i C I' ~ ~ ~ OJ> - " I u t:: IU I~ : Il~' C C o 0 10.0 I ~ § I~~ 1;1 ~ II~ ~ ;:::: 8 I ~,~ ~g I~~ l-__ I¥ is. ~ .¡; ! ~; I'] ~ " I ¡¡ ~ [I ~J! ~ ~ I;:: 1.1 !.~ .s I' ~ ~ !~~ II~~ i ~ or) _ I~ .~ 1-;; ê I Ê ~ I' & ~ ~ - ,0::: .5 i I i~ I~ ¡~ 18 Ii ¡ i I --- '-r-~--r-'-U-' Tu----- r-'- ',--__u ¡-- --l-----l ~ I I ! r .... I ! i :~ j"ii v [' I' ~ I 1 I õ í t ~ I g .g I I , 8" I ~',f' II É.o '-o~ I 'I ¡ E ~ I ~ 3 , ij~ IEoc "'§ igJ -š I I - - - I~ "@,_I ¡ .~ Ê Ii ~ ~ £ .~ I I ~] - - ~ II~ ~ ¡i,'''' I .", ~ i ~ .~"'" -; § I I z¡ I Ii ¡IB f j In I Ii ~ ] I ~ ~ ~ ~ Iii." ~ I~c' II~~" -š ë Ii 13 .~ õ.] II.... ~ _ "" ~ .~ g :Ë ß ~ I ] @ i·= ~ ] ..:', I 8 .g '.$ ~ ~ r I _ .... :::::: 1.1 ~ ~ § ¡.5 .9 :2 .5 ~ I!~, 'U 2 i ~ ] ; ¿..ß~. I ~. '0 is ~. ~ I I"" - I ,~"'" C :§ ~ ~ ~ ] I]) :t ~ ~ ! ï 'E ~' ¡i;ë g Ë ,I'¡a ~ ] <f¡ o:à j S E "2 ~ 1.-::: ~ ;j ¡g ~ .5 .... '" '" §;c¡ .D '" ,..... c ... c 8.;c¡~ I~Fu] ª'~ I Ië;~-£J 0 113Ê..::3 ~ ~ 0 I ~ N ~ '" I I c .5 ~ 0 S .E:' § I ~ .~J ~ ... g - ... g I I·~ - _0'1-0 I 9-..c: <f¡ i ë; 0.. "0 -;j 8 .~ '8 8 õ. C':I tn ~ I Õ.!?!J·- I'§§~ 1§~5 ou ot:;u E t"J..c:.<;:: 'õiJU~ .ö1.D u .~~ I I~~~'~ i~]~ I ~j~ 1'~lll~1 IllHI ~ I!l~ ;C,- ""',,,:3 ~ ¿: t: ._= t: t: I'~ ~ ~.5] I ;;.. .~ .;!¡ - _ ~ I r- r- I~ or,'¡:=: ~ C3 ¡:=: ~ I", I I I I I II' I I" -I-~- r-~ 1- I I ~ I g --¡-- I ~ i¡ ~I [1 I·.~o I,t~ - Ii - - I~ ,I Ie II~ I!! .~ I ~'" C ~ I~<Ç, Iii' : Ij ~ I¡~ ~ ¥ i i~ ~ ~ ~ li:_~o:" II Iii !~ i I~! I" 1<£ I~ ~ IJ ~ __~i .~ ¡~, Ii ~ ~ i 11 I: ~ I ~ 11 11 IIi I'~ I~ ~ il· I! ~ ìl I~] I!^~ II' ~ Ë t I·~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~o~ ..... -=- ..s "'0 id: ~ ::J 8 ¡;::J :11 1 ¡- ~ I !-- i- I ~ I ]: I I I Ii 10 II I ~ [] I] I] I~ Ii ~ i I~ ,8 ~ I' -Ii ~1 1- i I:".~II I~..: II ~ '§ i ~ ~ I~¡ ~, §:,J Ii ~ . ~ ·i ~ I! I~' ~ I: J~ :~II I~ 1! 'Ii 1~lli It j It *, I ~ ~¡.~ g] § ~ e 1-0 := .~ g. g. ~ ... .... ...8 _~ .~ -êi".~ I"'~ _i; .. ¡~-~- .j~ u__J~~I;' ~J~_= 'C I~ .0 ¡.., o 11 ¡ig E - " '5t I;;.. r.IJ ~ . I· ~ II~~ Ê* I ~ ~ : ~ i:){j ¡.; ·2 18' ~ I~ 5 I ¡~ 1 1 I~ ;., II~ E I~ ¡'i ,0 ,C Ig. I~ ¡~ I~ , f.... g¡ ~ '0 ~ o 'n w ~ ~ 10. :-, -¡¡ '0 .~ J .1 " I' ':',l (.~~ .1)2 ;~~ I! ~ I -5 <;¡ I I.ª ~ II ~ ~î¡ :"2 i ~ § "i5.ì i ë. ; ~ ¡ I! .~~! ~ OJ) Ö~! , ~.5 ~ ~! I g,~ ¡¡ ~ i. E.s: ª:: i :; ~ 8~! ) = ~ ~~! : :¡ §.Ë I ~ ..... ~ '':: 0 j 1.1 ~ ~~ ~I § 5 '" -"='..= Et~~!~ U= .~ 8 ;:! I ~ OLI co ::::::,- ë ~ ~ :!] CU E :: '3! c .~ ii3 § 2 I =3 'f 8~!~~ ~ .~ -< ¡.g ~ Q., ~ g.¡ 8 ~ ~ .~ ~ /.Ë ~ ~ 'õ e ;:g ~ Q ="'1.5£ ~ ~ !.,g.~ ] if-'::: õ.i . I I Õ b T--~-I---- , I I , I I~ = .:= '" '" ~ ~ .... = -ª ~ ~ '" ~ ~ " § "" p., " -", = " 2 01) ~ -5 E o i--o·J: " = ~.~ i g .g IE] I~; =-", I 2 ~ I<Ï5Z I 1 I~ ~ ] )3-g~ v d; ~ r-- 8: ib.g á) !e:å ~ 0 11.> ~ V -g I;: ~-t e j~~] ~} !~.~"8 ~ ¡~.~~ ~ 1·~1j ~ ;:ü- ~ '10 . ~ æ i!~:-§ 00 ~ I~ '[ e .Ëj 0 l!ií 1.1 0.:52 -...c: "'0.- ¡~~ ~.s it~]~ Ie::: C 0 ~ v¡ ~ c:s I~~g~ i=:; ~ g ;3..c rtI .. __~_~ ~,Š 1 i I] I·g i5 .E 01) .;:¡ ~ <oS: = ~ &- .9 ~. " " ~ = ~ .- ;; = ¡! I i :: t,1 ~ II ou ~ ~ I ',S .§~ Õ ~ Î li~, :§ -E I'~ I .~~~ I'" I ~ '1' ïã' ~ ~ \Q I~ ~ ::Q~ 1 OS) ! "'0 ~ '"' II~ i~ ~ 'ã~"' ~ 10 0. ~~ i@ I¡ ] :f; I II! Ii; ] "tj 1t ¡.= 0 .g ~.§ i :8- ¡ê z ~~ ! I<=< 1"'- 0<: ð'~ LJ____L~~l~._~~_ ¡ ~ I ; J 00 ("Ii '" = .... ~ = 'C 13= Sf;¡;¡ r:> ~ ~ ~I g ~ ~~ '" r:> , ~ .; '.... ~ :E ~ E-< U ~ :a = ~ Q. Q. -< '-' .!< 2" ,~ p., i~ -B , ~'¡.5 :~ ~ 1 ~ ~ Il~ 1j 0 ,i1J ~ I~'-ê ¡:g ~ ~ 0 I.~ ~ I};: = 0 I " "~ ;C':I'r'I 1V5 r::: I ~ ~ I g :; _lit i =~Ë~~ '~§ ~ 'ÊI 'ü ~.= ~¡ ':: ~ = yi ... ~ 0' ._ ;; ~ 1: ~ :¡.§ Q.-= .. ~ ë:. Q"CI Q_iO ~:; ~ ;¡ ... '" E 01 ==EiJ ~ ~~~L '" " '" E '" ... .:; 0' '" ~ Q Z 6 ¡.¡ ¡.¡ ,.¡ ... = '" '" ë. E '" .. ¡.¡ ~ -' " = 0." o ï: o ~ o ;;.. g' § ~ ~ :;'.0 2:5 0.0 p.,o ob~"5J = "oJ- ~:€ :g p.,..o ~ 'l):a 'l) ~ ~~ ~ ~ tí 0 .~ .ß 8 g .~ ir. (:, ~ 5 .§~~ 8 0·.... ,:.1 u E OJ) C !.,:; 2 oS ~ -¡j ~~.W ~ "'0 0...:;.:: 'l) .ª § [~ 8 2 ~ g ~!~~ ..8 = 6 :.a ",::OOf- I I I I ,0 0' ~ oh C05 E~ .ê! '§ ~ ~ g ~ ~. "'-"" ë &- ··-·-r-----T----r-- ---.f ·f---- I 1 Ii; I II ] I I' I .~ I. I ] I I :g I' ì ~ I 0 I~, i II ! ~ ~ ¡ . I~.g~ ,~_" I'l) 2 ,:.1 _ IB ~Š o~ if! 1 I ~ ~ II I.ij.¡ i] j~~ ~ ~ I II II¡_~ !.g 5 80:: ..6 ~ ,0 c"'O ,... 1...."'0 'J... .... ä g 0 !~C1 ?:ï~ ~ ~ ~~ !.~ I i J l' j ~~: f ~ .~ 1 IIJ r~~5[]'; ~ ;Æ ~ i::Ce~::S(j "3 ,:.1..0 ~ I001~,-=;::$= ~ 8~ ¡q I ~ ~ .~ °Ë ~ .~ :â :â 5 -; IU~UJu,:::;Q., r-< f-<~ is I' I I , 'I' , I l______+.__ ! -'- != I ~ ~ ~ !~. ~ 0 lr) ~ ~ ~ 'd i" ;¡j C':I oS U ir. 0 P .~ ] 0¡5> lò~ "'go I 8. O~] ~ _g -::.1 .... 'r; I'" - uÍ_'" ~ ::- ' s... ~..:!'J :-,.;::?'I ..:.::: _,... .~~ I! ni l!~~ I ~ .g "~ 8 8 5 'l) .~ ~ B :¥ ¡;£ ';¡; ~ .~ ¡;; § := ~.5 g ~ '~¡q .J::<n§uo -5~~g :'5 -5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ] g ::.1 '" = 'IÏ 1- ::.1 .1.) 'l) 'l) 0 u...... 'l) 'l) ,... 0 ~ ~ ~ I Èi ~ ~ G' t1 I ~ ~ ~ ~.~- ~ Èi <n Õ '" 0 ~ ri 'wi '" I~~] ~]§~~ ~]]E ¡~m-ê ~-ê~~f5 ~~:;~ I~ '~ 8 :~ 8 :] ~ :_~ ~h'~ ~ -]:; QÍJ ~ oL~ t1.~ "" ". ~ I:Ê ~ o~ 8. '~-B 8. ~ 1'~ ~ ] I ,3 ~ &.. -g 8. ~ ] ,= '"0 [ 0 ~ - '. - - ;.f $. ~ ~~~ ~~E~o c~o~ .¿c:ct:I oC':l24-;'l) O~N.... ¡5h=:§ s:8 §";~ a:8~ 5 i~~ ¡¡; i§ ~~1"::~ § ~ 8-g 1]0505 I:Š'~~ § §'5~,Ërª ~ i ~ '; ] '3 -g G' ;g 0 c;; .:; -g.5 ~ Õ r~ Ë 5ô _I:X:_!~_~~ E ~ 51d~.c:5 1 I I~ ~ = 8 o z . ,"-'1' i I r I ! I II I I ì I I I í i I = ~ u = I~ I~I Iii = -= '" '" /] ~I Ijl ~~~ 1= 1= ! =' I;: u '" 11 o1J I ~ '10 ,~ is Ii II Ii '" '" ¡: = = '" r'" il I~I i~ !I =r 1 ~ ~ I~ . I~ ~ i¿:: I.. 1'- ~ .~~ ; 1'- en j~~it_ I mJ 1 I -g ~ ~ ~ ~ ë 1 I II ~ ..O! I ,; ~ ~ I~ ~, § ~ ~ U ~ 5 II JJ j -.l~_ ~___~_ Ii :ë ~ '" ff' ~ Q :«: Q OJJ OJJ .... ~ ;; = .5: i5. o I 18 ::: 'E "" o~ -", § I I ! I ~ :tJ <n " ~ 0-", '"0 'l) ;;¡:-g ~ 8 :5~ o 0 ~ .~ o ~ o " ..==' -g.ß I ~ -g " ~ t§~ ,£ ~ "'2"::: °õ ~ ;.0 %,o¡ ~ o ._ ~ ~ ~ 'l).c: rn §g(:3 ~ ~ 0. ] *:~ - ~ :::> < ~ E I II , ì I I !/ "'I ~I ~I I ~I ..¡ ! ~ì .-, il .,!! '" r.n 'ê 'S 0- ~ ; II~ ~ o o 'E ~ ¡;¡ ..= -", Õ ] o = :r: d; ~ 5 .::: '.- ~ 't ~ S ,1\1 ~ 0 J,J:i. ... . _Ooo~ i---l i í I i I I "' " ~r <Ii ~: ~ ~; = ~ ~ ..= ~ -",;; g 0& ~ s ~." 'E ~ ~ ~. ~ ' " ~ ..=p., .<;:::"'0 ~ = I.¡!¡ '" ~ '.c: ";::'"0 I~ ~.Æ Is .§ ~ 'l) "'0 'l) U :~5h~~ ..::: ~ '"0 0Jj 1-.::: 5 ~ 5 !~ g ':'~ I ~ 0 'l) 0 i ~ 'l) ~'"O ¡.g ~.s ~ :~] ~~ i] ~i g if-< .....¡l..W i, ~ , , ~-+--- j~ :~ 0 I §- K! I U '" I~ ~ "-,,, " 0 'ë'~ i=~ I"; ~ 0'- i~ '§ i::ë P- ,~ E :=-= 0 I ~ " I t):j -g ,= ~ '0 I'~ .§ ¡I if = " 8-s " 0 i::: - '0 -", 'I~ ~ '..1! '6 - 'l) <"'0 i~ i¡¡; i~ ~ ,Z I I I !;j ~ ~ .~~ ~ u " 01) ~ "'- ~ \..J \ .7. (.~;;; 11 i'~~ ~ t· <! '" '" E ." E '" '" ~~ s §- ",,,, ~-E ,~,~ ~1 :6~ ~'" .,§~"' ~'" ~ ~ .~~ E~ ~§. ~i è· '" û:: ~I u-,------~-'-· .;; ~ I = .g I"~ ] , I'" u-, ~ ~.~I I :ª~ S ,5 I - ..g §'I "ß~ E ~ I "0 bIJ '-> - . ~.5 ~ ~ : ~ Q ~ E"= ·I~ §- ~ Ë '§ .r: 'C:§~i; "CI _ u ';:::! =Q~CI:2 =~§.~8 ) ~t !II ð .Q ~ ä ! ~ ..... e.I ~ ~ I':: ; f ~3'1~ "~oo § ~ ~' ..c: õ c:I :E ,; ~ < i'~ Ii=;' ~g.!~ ~ ·~~I] -t .[ ~ ! ~ Q ...... ! ::: ~ i~ .c " I") :; :; = IJ ..... = 'ª <1 ~ I. = ij õ ~ ..¿ ~ o ..c ;;..-, r C -0 ..c I:; B ~ I~ ~~ i~ So s. I'" ~ ~ ......~,::! i ~ ~ i:: !'['5 : 1.5 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ :; 10 0 E !'Ë ~:~ I ~ ~ = ii.9 c:I ::s ~ - I ~ -g ~ I'~ :iiJ .5.9 E ~~] u 0 . I ~ ~.~ ¿, I § § ~:.; I~'~~'ff IÆ æ ~·E ...j~ [~o 6 = ~ ; ~~ CIS § "0 .5i .s- ~ f:: &.oj .~ ;ß"S ~i ~ t: c:: O"-I:!J ~ ~ ~ ~I! ~ §-;u ~. ~ 8 "0 ......- 0 I.;: :: ; "Iz ~ ~ ~ ~ ::: ð JJ 01 t' <1 S ~~ :J §:iI' = 'C ëS s¡,.¡ o ~. U .1 .:.= = o 0 o ~ ~¡:¡: I. o ,~ '" .. .. e .. ... 'S 0' .. c:: Q Z ¿ ¡;.¡ ¡;.¡ ,.;¡ ... Q '" .. ë. e " .. ¡;.¡ c.i - ~ :ë <1 E-< U ~ :a = ~ 1:1. 1:1. -< ---l~ 'c 'u !U [OJ} ,~ i;t, !~ I", '= ,~ lu I' ~ I~· 'S ::s E E :8 Ig ¡g. i¿¿ ~ ::s ~ ~ ~ v, ::s c ~ ~ -5 ;0.. §l ~ ~.E B ~] ~ .a ~ ~ o Õ ... .9 E .;; ] ~ .;: ;;...5 .... ~...... ]'! I ;.g 'J_ I~§ ~; ~ ~ ~ II ~~ I ~ I ~ g.¿ ~ Ê (; 8 i~ I ~ ~ ] ~ 5 § 12 ~:: i-5 l0.c ~ ....c u 0/) ~ '" ,"'" -0 ,;:3 ..c.t; C c:I ~ ï: ë. ' c:I ~::g~,-g~"õ lL;ê i~ !] ~ ~ ~.g ~ _ B ~ ~ l..c I ;0.. dJ o::g ~ c.. BI..c: v ~J ,"'~_~ l-o..c - ~ ~ V '~IU C C ~~ ~~~~ ~I'ª.g-;; '5 ~ ~ ,~Ë ~ g c s 15 ~ I' ~ I,~ ~ "0 c:I .- U""" "0 's C II.~.;!¡ ~ E g.,~ "E1~"3 CT ;,. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :EI'~ 8 ~ ;:: I I I I' I , I I ! 8 i.__-L__._.J~__ :... 0iJ ' I 1~·5 .g 1 iÆ ~ ] ~ ~ 1= ~:;;,~] le~ ~~ ~ ! 5 ~ § a !. I ~!3:E ~ õ !~]]~] I' - 0 1) ;: ~ ~~~.~~ i~~'B~~ ¡,S:! C 2 0 '" )t) ~ 'gj g ~ !~g812~ Ie OJ.¡ dJ 'l) 1J 8 § ~=ª ] I ~'O;;..i:: ~ - E~~]'õ I~~ s~~~ ~~~å~ E v..... 0 I:; ~ ~ ~ ~ ;j~o~:§ §'~ ~ ::!J æ "E 'Ë E·~ Ë Ö ~.š ~ ~ f'""-.n. 1"8 1·= 13- I~ i I I t IC :~ I~ .= ¡~ I~ I~ I~ 1= ,0 ~ :.e i-¡¡ I~ Ii !g ~ ~ o ~ uõ: !("'-Î !M ~....l'::..._~~.. I'~ ... ~ I"" 10 i¿; I~ õ :5 '''I~''''-ll' ----------~-- ·~l--- II ~ I ~ t ... t .c 0 ri ~ ~'E- 5;:,~bt ff ~C§ -odJvC: ~ ~ '~ ~ §.~ U '5: ~ ;j'~-8 ~.g <I) g ~.~ " ~.: ~~§~f §: ~ I ! :1 ~ 1 @ ~ : i IE ] -š ~'~ 'ri'§.] e, -š .g Z¡í dJ\:I c:~ Oij 00<1) 'I:) < 5JJ§§:§ ã ~a~ ;.-=: ~~ U; ~ oóf.I ;"'-"-. c:I WJ c: c.5 <:';I .- 0::: I' e ~].E:Ë' ..."51..J 8 Ë~. ~;g e-i -o:§ ~.š.g i13 :],~.;¡; ~,.Eo.~I' ã·~ c:I c c:I ü 0 ~ fi ,- v 0- ~,..6 B s 6h S. 'f¡ ii:; 8"-0 ~ -;;.~ =B¡ êE ~'U 0 c 0 '(J V 1-<-0 <I:Î-ð~:X: ~ :§ å'~ [.'5 8 ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ :Ë -§¡:~ ª ] I :g :§ 8 § ~,g ~'~ ~ ~ "§ ; ~ [J: ~~ . ¡,S:! E ,5 U c:I 1j ~ 'U o..c :..c 0 ~ ~ .~ 31)dJO~~\-;~~üo~c~o~~ 5.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'Ë.. ~i ~ ~ g g ~ :g æ :3 ~ ~ § 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ð ~ -ffi -ffi ~ g ~ ~ ~ Ë š .s ';.5 I -g <E ~ ·5f~=u·:;'3~~"O_o"3<1)O~~o aOdJ,~,;:3CTCT~=OooBw~S~ ~ ¢: ¡::: ~ ~ ~ ~ Õ 8 Ž Ž t5 &: ~ 8 ~I ~ i--::- ¡6ì; .... I~ i@ !w ii ~, 0/) ... ~ o z 6 w w "" ~ Õ 5 '" 0/) = :§ 'S .c ] õ ... ~ ~ ~ "'''' 0/)", .§ .~ .c ::s ;o.~ if '" ~ ~ ... ~.c ë;::g ~ ::s .~ 0 ~.c :.a r.n "";0 '[' -l~-- 1 o u w "" ~ .c .9 0/) = :§ Ij '¡; <E g ~ ~ o ~ = 8 . .'" c u "'<;: '~ '~ Q u ,~ !r I!~ :? 1[îJ Ii 1- ;'" ,~ '" '" ië ¡l ~ ~ jS 'S 'S 0- 0' '" u 0 ::i! ::i! ,0.: 1 1_0 '... I.!:: ¡§.. I::i! ¡,;::::: :; is '2 I:::: I~ ¡;;;, :~ IV I~ I~ :- I t ~ I.~~Û i =S I·~~~ 1) 0 ~"" I,: Ir.., = I~· I] ~ ... u Q ... = I~ ~ I~ ~ I~ 8 I ~ ] I~ 1"3 :.@ 11 ~ ~..~ I!_::I .~.- õ. go 'tjQ,).g _ ; J~ ~ ~~_n I 1 C j.g i~ :8 'I- E ~ I;;' 'u ,''' ¡'~ I.f' I ~ I::: ,0 ¡u I't~ o ~ 0: ~. .,-i I.... 1.- !~ IE = 'OJ) 1,5 :2 I:~ 'x i~ 10 I~~ ~ ~ '" u o . ~ Ê ~! .00 .__..___-1':._._ 118 ~ u ... :if 0.. I' ,'·V ,'.? (.~~ 1:2 ·'v ~:: 1 :} ¡--r:-- I '" ~ = "" .~ ~-I ~ ~.~! Q,I _ c:: I ~ 2'§-i Q, ~ ë I e ~ ~ ì .. .;:¡ ¡:::: i ~ ~~~! ~"C ~ ~ I ~~ ~~; ~ =: § ~I -"CI ¡,. U ';::: I C ~ ~;I r:u rn :: E i :; 'Z.g 'õ ì = OJ) ø 0.1 Š ;~.š e t ;g~i U=~8~!1 ';i¡ ø :: vi ..... ~ ~ 5; ti ; ~ ø -§I=ð .~b5 ~ ~I] '';: ë co 1$ ~ jí¡1 ..:: z: ~ .~ fI. C ¡.., I 0 ~ '[ ~ i ~ ~ '¡¡ !É II I!J ! I I ffì : j: = .S '" '" ~ rF.J ... = -ª ..: ~ ... ~ " ..: S S = rF.J ... '" = ..... .~ = ... š!S sf;¡;¡ o ~ U ¡: ~ iš o ~ :fà~ ... o ~ '" .... = " 5 " ... 'S 0' " c:: Q Z Q ~ ~ ...¡ ... " '" " Q, 5 .. '" ~ cJ ..... ~ :::: ..: E-o I U ~ :a = ~ c.. c.. -< i ! ì ; 1 I,'E; !~ ~ I ~ I: I: ¡ß lê ~ Lù i~ ll~ I" " ~+--"::_---- ~ - ---~ i i I 1 ë ~ S ~ J ~ § ~ 'Ê¡I í /'Cj ~.= Qj I .t:- ~ =~I¡g I I c:: 0"_,:<1 1-;;; =: ~ ~ ~I ~ I.g I g. ~ .. ~I 8 I 0- -=:5! è'o;I:i ¡O ~ õ 5 §I I ~~5.gj ~ ð ðj 01 I r-- i , -"'i--"'-- I ~ ¡, 'I B I~' ~ E .5 .Ë I g ~ :: <n..r::: ; C ~~ ¡gg is "i: §. ¡,5 1'-;;; -::: E;d § i~ I !i'~ '\II~ ~ ï I~;g i ~ ~~ )g] I.g ~~ I'g; II~ r.,..::: -:5-: c; ~ I~ æ ~ ,.~ 1 ,~~ ~ ~iLL iJj if 5 ~"'" 1_:-;:: 1- 0 ~ -f I~.È i~ 2 ð~ I~ I~ -~_~L-- '; T'----Tr-r¡-~' ill I I ' , ' II II I ' I II II II ! I I ' I I1I1 II I I I I I I I :<: :;:; ~ i I I I I Ii! 10 :5 i.g 1.9 5 1"0 E I! :[ 1.5 fi II] ~ " ~ ~J ~ I~ :§ '.... c IcŠ '~ ] § I'~ ~ I' ~ '£ .c ~ !~ ~ i~ ~ I I I ì I I iciJ Ii 1- I~ I~ £ '" ;; ;; S:: I' , I '" 'I"" ,§ ¡o.:'§ c .c .-:: <:': Ö/j.~ ~ ::: 01) c _ -'- I~·~·ê~~ 1- ,- ~ ",,", I -ßJ]~~ã¿ I:: =;; aª ~ '~I ~ -s '5 ã s ~ 10 ;,..."'O..c E._ :g~-g~§~ I'§ ~ ~ ~ ~ ü I ~ ~ ,- ~ i/· I ~ ê ~ ~ .~ æ I,¡¡ 8 < ~ 'ê -/ 1111 ':J..c:.::!::s¿;:: 'IE~'gg::2 B ~ Z '... ëa 8 :~.s ,5 §]::: 1',_ c - - '" "I .E] .G' a "'0 u.. I~~n~ ~I 1'5 'Ë ~~ ~ ~ IF: .~..§ ~ ~ ~c~ "" ~ t!.i co: :c t; 1.i..c:n ::I~ 11:)1).... c _ =- !.~ ~ '~-5 ä a Ie ::I ~ ~ .2.;'3 1- I § I - 0 ~ '" - !~:~ !COO 11) j~~ ~ ¡ ~:g ~ '¡-= õ ~ . ! )·-:=.5 .~ I,~~n ::: - c :.5 COO ooufJ.1 ) S -g ~::3 I g ~·ß £ ~~~! ) "" '¡:: 0 ;... i":' ~ ïiJ.~ ¡g ë g g¡ 1.9] S Õ, I~ ~ Ol}~ I'~ 'š·§.·~ B~f;§ I ~ g ~'g !::I <.¡,., "'2 0 I' ~~, ~ ~I õ·..."'O.<::: ~ " ~ I~'~]~ r i I r~"-- I I I"" ¡~ ,0 ,0- I· ~ ,:e i , I i I 1 f '"" !~ i':; , 0- , ~ :0::: I I I I I--~I.~ I~ If; I~ Ii 111 I~ = I§ê ·Èi I g, i ¡j 70 I·~ ,ål I" ,,' ..c :~' ¡'l¡ ~ ] æ ã E..g ~ ~ I.!! E 3 :os ~I u 0.0 '"CI I:>! ~.~ -< ~.; "'~~ g '§ .., £'--$~ã ~ ~~8:o ~ I~i Ela:¡ 0 E = ßcij¡;;!__,---.ll;/) /j c; ~ .... ~ I~ ~ I~ .:! 1:= ~ "'I~ i~j ..Q Ë) . o cij!;; ··¡--i'ir-T----:rn II I. I. I. r I II I ! I I i I I I I I !-_! i II I I :5 I I I (J) i I. ~ I I 1 ~ I II I i I I I I ----1"--1' I I I I II I I I ' I I II 1 I ; I i I I I I I I i I i 1 ' I I I I I i , I II I I i I I I II ! I , 1 , I I ! 1 I ! I I i I I~ f I .E I g I'! co I § IE ~ I~ I I,; æ [ I ~ ~ ¡ æ I I '§ ~ iö' 1<1:: B I Î I /';;:j 1:1 l<g I I Ë 1:8 I' 2 ~ ~ ~ u ¡ 2::: ro 0 '§ I g ~ i?!' i~I' i~ ,~ 11£ ~ ~ C; "'0 ã ~ "t l~ I_~ ~ : . t} '-' '-' ... > ;15 .S ~ ~ .g tJ I '~~ ¡ !:: '"" ¡ ~~ I ~ ~ I ." '-' ~ ~ i c-;S I "g"2 I ~. ê I E.E i'~f I 0" ' ð5:s I ~ u ~ 01) '" 0.. I," I~ 10 ~ "' y c o -i:: o :: I~ I'~ Ii 1,0 ð ¡-= I,~ -i:: 10 ,:: ',-, I,g ~ I'; ';¡: I c I] ,~ I ~ IE "' II I:j r:! I g !."ê "'0 I"Y; I" I c ~ It o I g '-' I 0 co I~ Ó '" .LI.:J i::$ ,,' I'" = ::1... i'_~ I ;§ I ~ ~ '::'5: ë ~ I Uj ~ ::3 I en -a.; I ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ ¡~ .., I'@:¡ I § !~ I!ll i ~_ _lJ = " '" ë " 5 § '" u ê 0; "' ... u I~ "2 " ... ~IZ 1 i) " APPENDIX II TO REPORT PD 39-06 Pickering FCM Sustainable Neighbourhood Design Guidelines Revised Work Plan, June 13, 2006 " i) f) -.. ~_, I REVISED WORKPLAN JUNE 13, 2006 PICKERING FCM SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBOURHOOD DESIGN GUIDELINES This workplan is divided into two sections. The first section (Project Background) provides the project context as well as a brief summary of work completed to date. The second section (Workplan Details for Remaining Tasks) provides a description of the work to be completed as of May 2006. 1. PROJECT BACKGROUND: In 2005, the City of Pickering commenced the Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (SNP) Project with the assistance of the Green Municipal Enabling Fund. The City and its partners recognize the need to provide a solid foundation for future development and to provide the leadership, guidance and support required to make Pickering a sustainable city. This project is being run in parallel with the Partners for Climate Protection (PCP) program. A workplan for the Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (SNP) was prepared in November 2005. At that time the objective of the SNP was to identify a feasible affordable and multi-stakeholder approach to sustainable community design that could serve as a template for future development and that can apply to a selected development area. A neighbourhood plan was to be developed as Phase 3 of the City of Pickering Growth Management Study (GMS). The original workplan for this study is included in Appendix A. This original workplan involved the following steps: 1) Objective Setting and Project Start-up 2) Baseline Conditions and Sustainable Design Elements 3) Evaluation of Sustainability Levels for Subject Areas 4) Sustainability Concepts and Design Workshop 5) Preferred Concept and Reporting Over the first six months of the project, the objectives of the project were established and background information on sustainable neighbourhoods was collected. A best practices report was prepared describing case studies on sustainable community design. A list of objectives and strategies for sustainable neighbourhoods was also created. Based on this research, the outcomes of the project were refined to better reflect the needs of Pickering. To reflect this new direction for the project, this revised workplan has been prepared. ~f r~ ,"> -,.' ~. In general, the new direction is focused on the preparation of generic guidelines to be applied throughout the entire City rather than completing designs for a specific neighbourhood. The updated objectives of the Sustainable Neighbourhood Guidelines are to: 1. Identify a new approach to development; 2. Establish a practical set of guidelines for sustainable community design; and 3. Work collaboratively with municipal staff, developers, residents, energy providers, businesses and others to create far reaching, innovative guidelines. Through the Sustainable Neighbourhood Guidelines for Pickering, sustainability principles and strategies with measurable criteria will be developed as the basis for future development in Pickering. The guidelines will include specific sustainable strategies and targets related to community design, environmental preservation, as well as building design and construction. Instead of preparing neighbourhood concepts, illustrations will be used as examples to enhance the readability of the guideline document. The framework for developing these guidelines was developed using LEED-ND (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Neighbourhood Developments) as a model. The LEED system, which is administered by the Canada Green Building Council in Canada, has previously been applied to green building design and multi-unit residential buildings and is based on accumulating points for a prescribed list of criteria. The rating system is divided into 'Credits' and 'Prerequisites', and typically consists of a few prerequisites and many credits. To be certified a project must meet all the prerequisites as well as a certain number of credits, which are optional but contribute to the total points. A certain point total is required for LEED certification and higher point scores are required for silver, gold and platinum certification. The LEED-ND rating system is an emerging program being tested in the USA to develop a set of standards for neighbourhood location and design based on the principles of smart growth, urbanism and green building. LEED-ND is aimed at improving land-use patterns, neighbourhood design and technology and is based on four categories: Location Efficiency; Environmental Preservation; Compact, Complete & Connected Neighbourhoods; and Resource Efficiency. As part of the development of the framework, the objectives and strategies of the LEED-ND system were reviewed at a stakeholder workshop (Workshop #2) to determine their applicability in Pickering and which strategies should be required or optional. Discussions regarding targets for the strategies were also initiated at the workshop. ,,' ,., t! " . ...... /:' . As of May 2006, the remaining steps for the revised project are: 1) Target Setting; and 2) Recommendations and Reporting A detailed description of these new tasks is provided below. Note that the steps of the project that have already been completed based on the original workplan are not described in this revised document. For reference, the original workplan as well as a table summarizing the status and changes to the workplan is provided in Appendix A. It should also be noted that although the total budget for the project will not change from $204,000, the tasks within the budget have been modified to reflect the new direction of the project. A summary of the budget that has been used as of the end of April and the budget that is left is present below in Table 1. A detailed break-down of the budget is presented in Table 2 a and b. T bl 1 B d t S a e ulge ummary Fees Work Completed As of April 30, 2006 $ 134,363 Work Remaining As of April 30, 2006 $106,502 Total Project Budget $240,865 2. WORKPLAN DETAILS FOR REMAINING TASKS (as of Mav 2006): 2.1 TARGET SETTING Timeline: April 2006 - July 2006 Target setting will be conducted for the required and optional strategies for the guidelines. The methodology used to create the targets is presented below. 2.1.1 Review Case Studies and Best Practices Information from case studies and best practices will be used in the target setting process. Example programs will be reviewed to determine best practices for existing communities that have been successful in implementing sustainable strategies. The targets from these existing developments\buildings will be compared to the proposed LEED-ND targets and a proposed target will be 1 '-" I·' . developed based on this comparison. Some follow-up discussions with proponents regarding their experience with implementation will also be undertaken. A working draft will be produced and submitted to City staff for review, in consultation with consulting team. A revised draft will be produced. 2.1.2 Illustrations Where appropriate, illustrations including maps and figures will be used to describe the visible and "invisible" sustainability features described in some of the strategies and targets (i.e. including the "visible" urban design, and the "invisible" building envelope and infrastructure characteristics). Local Pickering examples will be included. These illustrations will be prepared prior to technical team meetings, which will be used to review the proposed Pickering targets, so that the concepts can be used as a visual display in the meetings. 2.1.3 Technical Team Meetings Starting with the revised draft strategies and targets, technical teams with expertise in a specific area will be created to further assist in the development of the targets. The teams will include individuals with proven experience in the specified field as well as staff from the City, a technical support person from the consulting team and other agency representatives such as the Region or conservation authorities, as appropriate. Eight to ten meetings are expected. Groups will be established to address topics including: 1) Community Design; 2) Buildings (Residential and Commercial); 3) Natural Environment; 4) Transportation; and 5) Utilities. 2.1.4 Target Setting The project team will use information from case studies, as well as input from technical team meetings, and existing policies to establish final draft targets for the strategies. 2.1.5 Develop Regulatory Parameters/Policies Where applicable, regulatory implications of the strategies and targets will be identified. For example, any approvals needed by other agencies will be identified. ,¡ ') F -~.. J 2.1.6 Implementation Strategies The general approach that will be required to implement the guidelines will be proposed. A detailed implementation plan will not be prepared, however, the tools that the City can use to implement the guidelines will be suggested (e.g. a particular strategy could be included as policy in an Official Plan amendment, Secondary Plan or in a zoning by-law). 2.1.8 Consultation The step will include Project Team meetings and technical team meetings. These meetings will be used to identify specific targets and to confirm the list of strategies. 2.1.9 Products · Documentation of proposed targets and implementation approach for Pickering including case study summary. · Documentation of technical team meetings. 2.2 RECOMMENDATIONS & REPORTING Timeline: Auqust 2006 - September 2006 Pickering-specific Sustainable Neighbourhood Guidelines will be prepared using the strategies and targets for required and optional items. The guideline will be prepared as a stand-alone document and will be similar to the LEED-ND format, with the detailed target for each strategy described. Where possible, illustrations will be included. The implementation process will be described in the document and will include a proposed point system. The guideline will be presented to the Project Team for final input/revisions. Subsequently, a public open house/workshop/event will be held with recommendations shown on displays to obtain input on the guidelines. 2.2.1 Interim and Final Report An interim report will be prepared for June 2006. The report will be updated in September and prepared as a final report. The guideline document will be included as an appendix to this report. The report will include: · Description and summary of stakeholder feedback; 'i ') '7 - >y I · Case study summary · Methodology used to develop guidelines (including summary of input from technical teams); · Proposed Implementation Approach. 2.2.2 Consultation The following meetings will be held in order to obtain feedback on the final draft strategies and targets: · Project Team meetings (2) · Public Open House . Council briefing (2) · Technical Team meetings as needed 2.2.3 Products · An interim and final report documenting the Sustainable Design Guidelines and their application in Pickering. 2.3 ONGOING PROJECT MANAGEMENT Re-evaluate Workplan and Budget The workplan and budget will be reevaluated based on the using LEED-ND as a model to develop SNP guidelines in Pickering. Products · Documentation of changes to the Work Plan/Budget. .' ? R i "_ ( Appendix A - Original Workplan .; ., n 1_ ..-. ,] Appendix A-I. Com arison of Nov. Work Plan and Pro osed Work Plan Status/Chan es Nov. 3 WORK PLAN STATUS AND PROPOSED CHANGES 1. Ob 'ective Settin and Pro 'ect Start-u -objectives -completed including decision to use generic -land use structure neighbourhood study area and 15t Yz day workshop -approach and criteria for screening -study area -1/2 da worksho 2. Baseline Conditions and Sustainable Desi n Elements -baseline conditions for conventional -design elements identified design -some work on baseline conditions complete but more -identify sustainable design elements discussion needed if comparison to base case will be (long list/short list) needed/helpful -consultation with project team -decision to use LEEO-NO as starting point for list of elements 3. Evaluation of Sustain ability Levels CHANGED TO Evaluation and Framework Develo ment -evaluation framework -evaluation and interdisciplinary reVIew -evaluation framework identified (LEED-NO) _2nd workshop completed as starting point for evaluating strategies and targets -work required to confirm optional and required strategies. - consolidate objectives where possible _ identify targets based on stakeholder feedback and case studies. - the case studies will involve reviewing best practices from existing projects that are leaders in one or all of the LEEO-ND categories (energy, connectedness etc.) -focus for identifying targets will be on prerequisites 151 -two target levels could be proposed - one as the initial start-u tar et and the final nei hbourhood desi n 4. Sustainabili Conce ts CHANGED TO Tar et Settin -illustrate 2 sustainability concepts - design workshop completed as a part of determining -design workshop base line conditions and sustainable design elements; -targeted stakeholder consultation - detailed review and refinement by City staff. -illustrations still to be done for sustainable features and not a neighbourhood -technical team meetings needed to identify targets and confirm list of strategies. Groups will be created to focus on different cate ories of the uidelines. ortin -all yet to be done 5. Recommendations and Re -preferred concept description - final report -open house -Council briefin 1 J () November 3, 2005 Workplan ., c4 \\, J ;g '~ ::: " :;; I:i :{,! ~ .. ;:;: o ü '" " ~ " i2 ~ "' "' .. :;! .... o .... --~---.~ d! 5 ~ ~~.- d ;¡~ a - ~"·-a- ci! 3 ô ~~ o~ 3 3 ;¡~ ""2 u~p ~_.._-~,.~~- -~~ â~ ~3 65d ~a -~;¡ d~ã ~dg "',..¡ ;j~! ---~- Nddd~ d.,;;g ¡ J ð¡ .~ "! ð H ~ ¡" ! ðh ~ ~H¡n :3~R ~ð:;~ 1'-¡.r ~~~ ~ ]~fI ð'U ~ ¡~~! ~~11 ~l!! 1~j~ ¡~jj ',:::::: iJ¡i ]"Ü II!sll l]fl!1111 ~!f¡l- J¡11;~~~~ ~l~~ll ~~~!!I!ll ljjjJJ ~j~~~~~JJ H :~::~~:H d d ~~ n , .dJ J HJ Jill ! ! . ¡]jj _ in ].pJ~ÆIf ,'~ ~I . ~~;j3 H~d "" f;t!·uIU dd¿ii~Ji "~"~"~J~ ~ ~ ~d;jÓó ~ i I { j! J ~ '..¡¡ ð ! p~- í' ] ~i~H ]j~.d~ldl~ hj!~:ð11~!. !lJnhLlH , ¡"~~1~. ~~ l ~~ p~;j;¡"" t\i']~ilH~;~~ <Íi ð~æ~ðiU :~::~~~~~H -.. ,~ -.. '"" C""'3n ¡ " -- .~.. "',,' '",r" ,- " N ~ " " " .. Q :! ~ Co ~ ~ " Cc g ~ - .. ,,; " ~ ~.~ u: o ~ w ;: : " '>'- ....'0 r_ ,,.., - - .- ,,"., ..j - --:..- "';':';'-'" ~J~~~;;;~ D~O ~¡: 0,1,'.: !¡ !; ~ 1 f , 2 '" ~ L r ë ~ § ¡¡ ª ~ '~]l ¡:: ~ ~-;;, !I!!!! ~~g~~~ ~ § ~~~~~~ ............"" ~ l~ ,...; h -~ ,..~ ,"; --;,..¡ ,,"., ~ 11 ~ o ~D ~O 0 o a. ~ , ... :,: oi"§ EC §l 1;' ~~ 8Ž J 1 ~,¡, ~ ~ ~,*.t i _mi¡¡ -- :.;: 11 ~~~~~,~";H ~ I " 1 ~ 1. 3 '1 ATTACHMENT' I TO REPORT' PO _~q -ob Figure 1 Illustration of Framework Combining Prerequisite and Optional Performance Measures to Achieve Different Sustainability Ratings I~~--------- S U - S--;-~~~~~:-I--:-~-~~---~--~- I I LEV E L Number an~ T--'~-"-" -......---..-- ~._---~---~.__..~~-~------~~----~--~-~ Quality of Measures to Platinum be Met t -I I ..~-~~~ Gold Increasing Silver t Certified t All CiÚIIJ~ REPORT TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1 3,1 _ t Report Number: PO 40-06 Date: June 26, 2006 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 2/06 Pickering Harbour Company 1213 & 1224 Sandbar Road (Lots 219-224, Lots 283-288 and Part of Lots 218,289, Plan 299) City of Pickering Recommendation: 1. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 2/06 be APPROVED, as set out in the draft by-law attached as Appendix I to Report PO 40-06, to amend the existing zoning on the subject property to an "OS-PR" Open Space Passive Recreation Zone, to permit a wind turbine and passive recreation uses, on lands being Lots 219-224, Lots 283-288 and Part of Lots 218 and 289, Plan 299, City of Pickering. 2. That the amending zoning by-law to implement Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 2/06, as set out in Appendix I to Report PO 40-06, be FORWARDED to City Council for enactment. 3. That Council ENDORSE the initiation and coordination by staff of a future zoning by-law amendment application, in conjunction with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and the Pickering Harbour Company, to rezone the remaining lands of the East Spit between the subject property and Liverpool Road (Parts 8 to 16, 40R2022, Parts 1, 2 and 3, RP 40R6366) to an appropriate open space category to implement the Open Space Systems - Natural Areas of the City of Pickering's Official Plan. Executive Summary: The applicant requests a zoning by-law amendment for the establishment of an Open Space Zone to permit a wind turbine and other recreation uses for the property located at the terminus of the East Spit of Frenchman's Bay (see Attachment #1 - Location Map). The lands are currently vacant. The applicant proposes to construct a privately owned and operated wind turbine on these lands to provide power for its marina operation located on the east shore of Frenchman's Bay (see Attachment #2, Applicant's Submitted Plan). The wind turbine represents a form of sustainable development that implements the Pickering Official Plan and is consistent with the Liverpool Waterfront Node Development Guidelines. J ~ ';Report PO 40-06 Subject: Pickering Harbour Company (A 2/06) Date: June 26, 2006 Page 2 Staff support the wind turbine use however the extent and intensity of recreational uses requested by the applicant does not maintain the intent of the Official Plan. Development of the site should be restricted to passive recreation uses as set out in the proposed amending by-law (see Appendix I). It is recommended that this application be approved for a wind turbine and passive recreational uses, and that the draft by-law be enacted by City Council. Financial Implications: No direct costs to the City are anticipated as a result of the proposed development. Background: 1.0 Comments Received 1.1 At the April 20, 2006 Public Information Meeting (see text of Information Report and Meeting Minutes, Attachments #3 and #4) · Ian McCullough of Marshall Homes, authorized agent; attended to explain the proposal as outlined in the Information Report 06-06 and also stated that the owner would construct a wind turbine that would be visually compatible with the Waterfront; · Sylvain Trepanier, area resident at 1218 Monica Cook Place, raised the following issues with the application: - clarification regarding fragmented ownership of the properties, including road allowances along the East Spit; - the impact the proposed wind turbine would have on the view from Frenchman's Bay; - clarification on the definition of 'passive recreation uses'; · Maurice Brenner, Regional Councillor, Chairman, suggested that the applicant provide a follow-up to this meeting with the Waterfront Coordinating Committee to address the issues raised by Mr. Trepanier; 1.2 Following the Information Meeting · The applicant was invited to attend the May 25th, 2006 meeting of the Waterfront Coordinating Committee to provide further details on the application; · The applicant's proposal was well received by the Waterfront Coordinating Committee; · Planning & Development staff have been advised orally by the TRCA that, although agreements are in place between the Pickering Harbour Company and the TRCA to rationalize the ownership of the adjacent properties and the road allowance along the East Spit, these transactions have not been finalized; · Finalization of the above-noted agreements is expected in the near future, subject to the fulfillment of conditions; Report PO 40-06 Date: June 26, 2006 1.38 Subject: Pickering Harbour Company (A 2/06) Page 3 1.3 City Department and Agency Comments Region of Durham Planning Department no objection as the development of windmills is permitted within all land use designations provided that the requirements of the Environmental Assessment Act are adhered to; - the proposal promotes alternative forms of energy and exhibits a mix of uses, as is intended along Waterfronts (see Attachment #5); Toronto and Region Conservation Authority - the applicant has submitted the required Permit Application to the TRCA and a permit must be obtained prior to any development occurring within the subject property; recommends that, once the wind turbine is constructed, a monitoring study be undertaken to investigate the frequency of bird and bat mortality in the area (see Attachment #6). 2.0 Discussion 2.1 Proposal The applicant proposes the establishment of a wind turbine at the gateway to Frenchman's Bay at the terminus of the East Spit, for the purpose of providing power to the adjacent marina operation. The proposed height of the wind turbine to its hub and the length of the blades would be 50 metres and 13.4 metres, respectively, for an actual height of 63.4 metres above established grade. The applicant requests that the current "R-4" Residential zoning be changed to an "OS-PR" - Open Space Passive Recreation Zone to allow passive recreation uses and a wind turbine on the subject lands. Wind turbines convert and store the kinetic energy from the wind into electrical or mechanical power. Passive recreation generally encompasses the less intensive range of outdoor activities that are compatible with preserving natural resource functions such as wildlife habitat, wildlife obseNation, floodplain protection, as well as walking or biking. The owner further intends to utilize the property to host temporary events such as regattas in association with the adjacent marina operation, weddings, and associated photography. .~ ~i Report PD 40-06 Date: June 26, 2006 Subject: Pickering Harbour Company (A 2/06) Page 4 2.2 Compatibility of Uses 2.2.1 The proposed wind turbine use complies with the Pickerinq Official Plan desiqnation, is an appropriate and compatible use within the Bay Ridqes Neiqhbourhood, and is consistent with the Liverpool Road Waterfront Node Guidelines The subject property is designated Open Space Systems - Natural Areas within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood. This designation permits conservation, environmental protection, recreation and ancillary uses. The Bay Ridges Neighbourhood policies encourage City Council to promote the Waterfront Node as a boating, tourism and recreational area. This proposal is consistent with the policy. The applicant's proposal is consistent with the "Great Lakes Nautical Village" theme outlined in the Liverpool Road Waterfront Node Development Guidelines as it introduces a mix of compatible uses on the lands. The proposed uses would provide land-based recreation and tourism opportunities in accordance with the Liverpool Road Waterfront Node Development Guidelines. The views from the neighbourhood toward Frenchman's Bay and Lake Ontario would not be adversely impacted by this proposal (see Attachment #7 - Aerial View at the East Spit of Frenchman's Bay). 2.2.2 While passive recreational uses are supported for the lands. the more intensive uses proposed are not supported The applicant requests that the implementing zoning by-law permit passive uses related to and supportive of preservation of the natural environment, such as wildlife observation, floodplain protection, walking and biking. However, they also request that the by-law allow more active uses such as regattas in association with the adjacent marina operation, and weddings and other special events including ancillary photography. While staff support the introduction of strictly passive uses and photography associated with weddings, we have concern over active uses such as weddings, wedding receptions, regattas, and other large social gatherings. These uses require the nearby provision of vehicle parking and services such as washrooms which are not available to serve this location and will put undue pressure on existing public facilities. The Open Space - Natural Areas designation of the land is intended to ensure primary uses that promote conservation and environmental protection. Uses other than those associated with passive recreation are not appropriate for these lands. Report PO 40-06 Date: June 26, 2006 Subject: Pickering Harbour Company (A 2/06) Page 5 J3q 2.3 Zoning By-law Performance Standards 2.3.1 The proposed by-law permits Open Space Passive Recreation uses and a Wind Turbine on the subject lands The proposed by-law would permit one wind turbine and passive recreation uses such as biking, walking, hiking, and photography. A gazebo related to passive recreational uses would also be permitted on the subject lands (maximum 40 square metres floor area). It is recommended that the following uses be permitted on the subject lands: . passive recreation (no major buildings or structures permitted) . wind turbine (private) 2.3.2 The proposed by-law will reaulate the maximum heiqht of the wind turbine It is recommended that the wind turbine tower be limited to a maximum height of 50 metres, being measured to the peak of its hub, and a maximum overall height of 65 metres, being measured to the top of the blades at their full vertical extension. For reference purposes, the existing Ontario Power Generation wind turbine located next to the City's Nuclear Power Station provides an overall height of 117 metres, when measured to the top of the blades at their full extension (see Attachment #8 - Illustration Comparing Proposed Wind Turbine and Existing OPG Wind Turbine). 2.3.3 The proposed by-law will recoanize current dredainq practices It is recommended that the proposed by-law include a clause that would allow current dredging activities related to Frenchman's Bay to continue. 2.4 Site Plan Approval is required prior to construction of the proposed Wind Turbine 2.4.1 The City's requirements with respect to the sitinq of the wind turbine will be addressed throuqh the site plan review process. Amonqst other matters. the owner will be required to address: · the design of fencing to be provided around the proposed wind turbine tower that ensures anti-climbing protection; · lighting, signage; · details regarding the power connection to the adjacent marina operation; · an agreement between the owner and the City which ensures that a post construction monitoring study is submitted to the satisfaction of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to investigate impacts of the proposed wind turbine on wildlife; 1 :~)Report PO 40-06 Subject: Pickering Harbour Company (A 2/06) Date: June 26, 2006 Page 6 · appropriate siting of the wind turbine tower which doesn't preclude the potential for the future construction of a connecting bridge across the East Spit and West Spit of Frenchman's Bay; · the applicant shall provide confirmation from the Ministry of Environment that the proposed wind turbine is not subject to Environmental Assessment Act requirements (it is our understanding that the wind turbines generating less than two megawatts of electricity output are not subject to the Electrical Projects Regulation under the Environmental Assessment Act, and do not require an Individual Environmental Assessment); · the applicant will be required to provide confirmation of any restrictive covenants regarding access over TRCA and City of Pickering owned portions of the Right-Of-Way (Sandbar Road) between the subject lands to Liverpool Road and over Liverpool Road; 3.0 Applicant's Comments The applicant has been made aware of the content of this report, has reviewed the draft zoning by-law, and is concerned that the proposed by-law is too restrictive and will not permit for uses associated with certain social events. The applicant requests that opportunity be provided for weddings, wedding receptions, and larger social gatherings, rather than be restricted to wedding photography and small group gatherings. APPENDIX: Appendix I: Draft Implementing By-law Attachments: 1 . Location Map 2. Applicant's Submitted Site Plan 3. Text of Information Report 4. Minutes from Statutory Public Meeting 5. Comments from the Durham Region Planning Department 6. Comments from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 7. Aerial View at the East Spit of Frenchman's Bay 8. Illustration Comparing Proposed Wind Turbine and Existing OPG Wind Turbine Report PO 40-06 Date: June 26,2006 -I /~ Q. ~_ '-t Subject: Pickering Harbour Company (A 2/06) Page 7 Prepared By: Approved / Endorsed By: 1 ~C#~ Rick Cefaratti Planner II Neil Carroll, Director, Planm ~- Lynda aylor, MCIP, 8 Manager, Developm nt Review RC:ld Attachments Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City ouncil " , ~; A ."'1 _I. "f ... F PICKERING BY-LAW NO. Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 2511, as amended, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham on Lots 219-224, Lots 283-288 and Part of Lots 218, 289, Plan 299, City of Pickering. (A 2/06) WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering deems it desirable to permit the establishment of passive open space uses on the subject lands, being Lots 219-224, Lots 283-288 and Part of Lots 218, 289, Plan 299, City of Pickering. AND WHEREAS an amendment to By-law 2511, as amended, is therefore deemed necessary; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCHEDULE I Schedule I to By-law 2511, attached hereto with notations and references shown thereon are hereby declared to be part of this By-law. 2. AREA RESTRICTED The provisions of this By-law shall apply to those lands in Lots 219-224, Lots 283-288 and Part of Lots 218 and 289, Plan 299, City of Pickering, designated "OS-PR" on Schedule I attached hereto. 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS No structure, land or part thereof shall hereafter be used, occupied, erected, moved, or structurally altered except in conformity with the provisions of this By-law. 4. DEFINITIONS In this By-law, (1) "Dredqinq" shall mean the use of equipment and / or machinery to remove sediment from the bottom of waterways, wetlands and other bodies of water and / or to deepen or widen a harbour; (2) "Passive Recreation" shall mean outdoor activities compatible with preserving natural resource functions such as wildlife habitat, wildlife observation, floodplain protection, biking, hiking, walking, and photography, and shall not include any buildings or structures; ¡ :, ", - 2 - ~.J\f1eiQht - Wind Turbine" shall mean the height of a wind turbine, being n r' measured from the established grade to the top of the blades at their full V vertical extension; (4) "Wind Turbine" shall mean a structure or a system of components used to convert the kinetic energy of the wind into electrical or mechanical power that comprises all the necessary devices for energy storage, power conditioning, control systems, transmission systems and structural support systems, to provide electrical or mechanical power for private consumption; 5. PROVISIONS (1) Uses Permitted ("OS-PR" Zone) No person shall within the lands designated "OS-PR" on Schedule I attached hereto, use any lot or erect, alter, or use any structure for any purpose except the following: (a) passive recreation (b) wind turbine (2) Zone Requirements ("OS-PR" Zone) No person shall within the lands designated "OS-PR" on Schedule I attached hereto, use any lot or erect, alter, or use any structure for any purpose except in accordance with the following provisions: (a) WIND TURBINE: (i) maximum one wind turbine (ii) maximum height of 65 metres; (b) SPECIAL REGULATIONS: (i) Despite Section 5. (1), dredging activities related to the maintenance of Frenchman's Bay shall be permitted; (ii) Despite Section 4. (2) and 5. (1 )(a), one freestanding, unenclosed gazebo, in support of the passive recreational use of the lands, shall be permitted having a maximum floor area of 40 square metres; 6. BY-LAW 2511 By-law 2511 is hereby amended only to the extent necessary to give effect to the provisions of this By-law as it applies to the area set out in Schedule I attached hereto. The relevant provisions of By-law 2511, as amended, shall govern definitions and subject matters not specifically dealt with in this By-law. - 3 - 14 .~ 7. EFFECTIVE DATE This By-law shall come into force in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. BY-LAW read a first, second, and third time and finally passed this _ day of 2006. David Ryan, M~~ ~~~ Debi A. Bentley, City Clerk 1. 4 :'; -~-~ íì ___~ :::::::::----<~ \ 't-_ " I I l , I /1, I \, , 'L_J r- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ FR£NCHMANS BA Y \-- k \ \ \ \ --"'\ ,..'\ '-' y'" \".. ,~ / \ ......'\ \......-....-... "< ----- _-rr"T'1---- -í~"Î- Ul==rTÏ¡ - - Þ; ¡-r"1' I I I I II II jilL _ I I jill- ---- J L-- -- LAK£ ONTARIO l' SCHEDULE I TO PASSED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY CLERK 2006 ~f1 O~ 11_-1-TO it Pu_ 40-010 . 4(' _I. - n , I I I I I J I J I , I ,-_J ( '"'\ .210 R I J ==1 L tri I BROWNING AÍl "'" s- /l~ ~ ~~ \'- ~ (~ I «~ -' \'\=JI - - ." - ~tl~~ ~RI~ ~ - WATER~N.NT -I STR.E.\ET I ~ ~i? ÞI liT ILONA PA K a::: w > ...J ROAD I-- L Ó I~ ~ \ll ~ '\ - - I I I SUBJECT PROPERTY ~ ~ I I COMMERCE STREET COM ~~~LLL~ f-~f--a:::- \--r- (/) "ö :J: ~ ~ _ _f- ~q - ANNLAND À J V 1---- ~~ , WHARF ST -1 ~ H r= r= ~ ~ r =:::j ç~~~ ~ \.lJll) = = = = = = - -...J -0 o 0.. G-~ :J '1..::: -rr- ~ f--.....- II ~ r- IL ~( ~~ - - _f- - ", FRENCHMAN '5 BAY - J--. n~fl LAKE ~uu ONTARIO City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LOTS 219 - 224,283 - 288, PARTS LOTS 218, 218, PLAN 299 OWNER PICKERING HARBOUR COMPANY FILE No. A 02/06 DATE JUNE 13, 2006 DRAWN BY JB SCALE 1 :5000 CHECKED BY RC l' 0lO :>ourc..: ~ -1'b"3~.~p~¿.~:à.)i. 1~~p~~~..ltÄII·~r:~~~"·R.~~~~~~t·N~·~·~rad,; ~fts~~~.n of .urv.y. PN-03 \.IJ o· ~ q: f: rfi ~ o .CQ 0:: ~ :x: ~.- --- .; 4'7 J - · 2. Tn I';' __ij~:.Ol;-:"'.:H' INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED PLAN A 02/06 - PICKERING HARBOUR COMPANY TO RE·ZONE THE SUBJECT LANDS F" .ROM A "R4" RESIDENilAL ZONE TO AN OPEN SPACE ZONE TO ALLOW A WINDMILL AND PASSIVE RECREATIONAL USES. FRENCHMAN'S BAY --"- - .!........--...... \ \ . LAKE ONTARIO PROPOSED WINDMILL lOCATION SURROUNDED BY A FENCE ~ THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & DEVELÚPMENT DEPARTMENT. PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN, APRIL 5, 2006. ~. 3 Tn 71;f:~gE>' 148 INFORMATION REPORT NO. 06-06 FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING OF APRIL 20, 2006 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLANNING ACT, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13 SUBJECT: Zoning Amendment Application A 02/06 Pickering Harbour Company Limited Sandbar Road Lots 210 - 224, Lots 283 - 288, and Part of Lots 218, 289 Plan 299 City of Pickering 1.0 PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION - the lands are located at the east side of the harbour entrance to Frenchman's Bay, west of Liverpool Road, north of Lake Ontario, and is generally known as the East Spit and are currently vacant (see Attachment #1 - Location Map). 2.0 APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL _ the applicant proposes to rezone the subject lands from a "R-4" - Residential Zone to an Open Space Zone that would allow a windmill and passive recreation uses (see Attachment #2 - Applicant's Submitted Plan); _ the owner intends to construct a private windmill on these lands in association with the adjacent marina operation. 3.0 OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING 3.1 Durham Reaional Official Plan _ the lands are designated Major Open Space System - Waterfront in the Durham Region Official Plan; - designates Frenchman's Bay as a Waterfront Place; _ promotes Waterfront Places such as Frenchman's Bay to be developed as focal points along the Lake Ontario Waterfront, and permits a mix of uses including marina, recreational, tourist, cultural and community uses in these locations; - the application appears to conform to the Durham Region Official Plan; .; 1 ,) ,I !fnformation Report No. 06-06 w~q # 3 T" 1,'!~' ,'_ .~u pc [/()··õ1o 'u,'''''''''''' ,...,.'""-"'"""..."""""....'F.'.';'~... ". Page 2 3.2 Pickerina Official Plan the lands are designated Open Space Systems - Natural Areas within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood; - the lands are intended to be used for conservation, restoration, environmental protection, recreation, and ancillary uses; - the lands are subject to the "Liverpool Road Waterfront Node Development Guidelines"; - the subject application will be assessed against the policies and provisions of the Pickering Official Plan during the processing of the application; 3.3 Liverpool Road Waterfront Node Development Guidelines - the main theme for the entire Node is that of a "Great Lakes Nautical Village" having a mix of uses and an inviting ambiance; recognizes Frenchman's Bay as a boating tourism area that provides seasonal marina facilities and additional land-based recreation and tourism opportunities; recognizes that the East Spit exhibits the characteristics of a dynamic beach; - establishes that the Village will offer opportunities for people to live, work, shop and play within the area; establishes that public uses are appropriate on the spit including a limited number of supportive buildings; emphasizes the importance of preserving and / or enhancing the views from the area towards Frenchman's Bay as key considerations in the review of any development proposal; 3.4 Zonina Bv-Iaw 2511 - the subject lands are zoned "R-4" - Residential Zone by By-law 2511, as amended; this current zone category permits detached dwellings; - the applicant has requested the lands be rezoned to permit a windmill and passive recreation uses; 4.0 RESULTS OF CIRCULATION 4.1 Resident Comments no written resident comments have been received to date; 4.2 Aaencv Comments Veridian Connections - no objections; Information Report No. 06-06 i!,!.¡';\.riT#_ 3 TO , ÇL 4,. -Db ,,,,,",,,,·..>N"';';'~_:>~_' Page 3 ,..... iÌ. _~ .J ¡ , 4.3 Staff Comments In reviewing the application to date, the following matters have been identified by staff for further review and consideration: _ the appropriate separation distance from residential dwelling areas to the proposed windmill location; _ the appropriateness and compatibility of the proposed windmill and passive recreation uses with the surrounding uses area; - the evaluation of the Liverpool Waterfront Node Development Guidelines in relation to the proposed uses on the property; - the examination of whether any site alterations, servicing and / or grading works are proposed are required to accommodate the proposed windmill and passive recreation uses on the subject lands; the determination of whether any future studies may be required including, but not limited to, a noise impact report to evaluate any potential noise disturbance issues that may be associated with windmills. 5.0 PROCEDURAL INFORMATION - written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning & Development Department; oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting; all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Council or a Committee of Council; if you wish to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision, you must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this proposal; if you wish to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal, you must request such in writing to the City Clerk. 6.0 OTHER INFORMATION 6.1 Information Received a full scale copies of the applicant's submitted plan are available for viewing at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department; the need for additional information and / or studies will be determined through the review and circulation of the applicant's current proposal; ~¡ ~~rmation Report No. 06-06 ¡ #----r.?J- _nJ q{)-()€.; "....tC,··~,.......".,'''''·~''''''''.''''.c''':r'_·'~-~·","' " Page 4 6.2 Property Principal - the owner of the subject lands is Pickering Harbour Company and the Principal is Harold G. Hough, President; - the authorized agent is Ian McCullogh of Marshall Homes. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY ORIOINAL SIGNBDBŸ Rick Cefaratti Planner II Lynda Taylor, MCIP RPP Manager, Development Review RC:ld Attachments Copy: Director, Planning & Development " g 'in :".,.-.,~.:;,...;~;)~~~ V ,",r.rC,>;:f!ç¿,,,,, ' 152 APPENDIX NO. I TO INFORMATION REPORT NO. 06-06 COMMENTING RESIDENTS AND LANDOWNERS (1 ) none received to date COMMENTING AGENCIES (1) Veridian Connections COMMENTING CITY DEPARTMENTS (1 ) none received to date 'ì 5) OÚI ~# i.",.......Lf.~IJ '-/õ ·-Dl, ···,·_...·...··,·_"··;='j.·~"'~'.-,·~'v.".~"'-.,'"·.,',..,, Excerpts from Minutes I Meeting Summary Statutory Public Information Meeting Council Chambers Thursday, April 20, 2006 7:00 pm. Attendees: Councillor Brenner - Chair Lynda Taylor, Manager Development Review Geoff Romanowski, Planner II Rick Cefaratti, Planner II Birgit Wilson - Recording Secretary Also Attending: Ian McCullough, Authorized Agent of Marshall Homes Lauralei Jones, Planner Altridge Properties Inc. Lynda Taylor, Manager, Development Review, provided an overview of the requirements of the Planning Act and the Ontario Municipal Board respecting this meeting and matters under consideration there at. 2. ZONING BY -LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 02/06 PICKERING HARBOUR COMPANY LIMITED SANDBAR ROAD LOTS 210 - 224, LOTS 283 - 288, AND PART OF LOTS 218, 289 PLAN 299 CITY OF PICKERING 1. Planner Comments Rick Cefaratti, Planner II provided an overview of the property location, applicant's proposal and City's Official Plan policies pertaining to this site, as outlined in the Information Report # 06-06. He stated that to date no comments/concerns have been received from outside agencies or the public. 2. Applicant Comments Ian McCullogh, authorized agent of Marshall Homes explained the proposal as outlined in the Information Report # 06-06. He stated that the owner would construct a windmill on these lands to conform to the esthetics of the Waterfront Place. I 3. Comments from Members of the Public Sylvain Trepanier 1218 Monica Cook PI. Mr. Trepanier was not sure whether or not he supported the recommended rezoning as he felt to date there has not been enough information available to the public to Page 1 CORP0228-2/02 ~ 9t) '-Db 154 make a proper assessment. He further expressed a concern that the Statutory Public Information Meeting was of no value as he felt the recommended by-law would now go before Executive Committee for the recommendation to be enacted. Mr. Trepanier had additional concerns as follows: · Road ownership, public or private? · Ownership of the land is fragmented, some public some private-how will that be addressed? · What is passive recreation use? · Will the proposed windmill block the view from the Bay? · Which Official Plan does the proposal conform to Durham or Pickering? · Middle is a public road, will this remain public and if so will a fence be erected. Lastly, Mr. Trepanier asked for reassurance from The City of Pickering that additional information will be forthcoming and that the residents will be kept informed as this goes forward. 4. Response from Applicant Ian McCullogh, authorized agent of Marshall Homes confirmed that at present there is fragmented ownership of the lands and that ownership consolidation is being addressed and will be finalized very shortly. He further stated that before this project goes forward, there would be conceptual drawings submitted to The City of Pickering. 5. Staff Response Rick Cefaratti adYised that the proposed plan conforms to the Durham Official Plan Which permits a mix of uses including marina, parks, recreational, tourist, cultural and community uses. 6. Comments from the Chair Councillor Brenner assured Mr. Trepanier that the purpose of the Statutory Public Information Meeting was to gather information from the public on the proposal and that no proposal will be put before Executive or Council until all interested parties are heard and that all concerns are addressed. He further stated that for this particular proposal there is not sufficient information to make a recommendation either for or against and that a Site Plan that addressed issues such as road access and conformity to the Waterfront Plan needs to be approved before this proposal can go forward. He further suggested that Planning and Development, Lynda Taylor should follow-up with the Waterfront Coordinating Committee and host an open meeting to address all issues raised this evening. Lastly, he stated that a second Statutory Public Information Meeting may be needed before a decision to approve or deny this application can be made. Page 2 CORPQ228-2JO? --:.....- I ~)) The Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department 605 ROSSLAND ROAD E 4'H FLOOR PO BOX 623 WHITBY, ON L 1 N 6A3 (905) 668-7711 Fax (905) 666-6208 E-mail' planning@ reglondurhamonca www.regiondurham.on.ca A.l. Georgieff, MCIP, RPP Commissioner of Planning "Service Excellence for ()i;( Conll11unitjcs" 5 L/Ù-CXo '"" April 28, 2006 Rick Cefaratti, Planner 1/ Pickering Civic Complex One The Esplande Pickering, Ontario L 1V 6K7 Via Email: rcefaratti@city.pickering.on.ca Mr. Cefaratti: Re: Zoning Amendment Application A02/06 Applicant: The Pickering Harbour Company Location: Sandbar Road Municipality: City of Pickering This application has been reviewed and the following comments are offered. The purpose of this application is to amend the zoning of the subject property from "Residential R-4" to an "Open Space Zone" to permit a windmill and passive recreational uses. ReQional Official Plan The lands subject to this application are designated "Waterfront" in the Durham Regional Official Plan. The development of electric power facilities, including windmills, is permitted within all land use designations provided that the requirements of the Environmental Assessment Act are adhered to. Waterfronts are to be developed as focal points that exhibit a mix of uses. Recreational uses may be permitted within the Waterfront designation. Provincial Policies & Deleaated Review Responsibilities This application has been screened in accordance with the terms of the provincial plan review responsibilities. There are no matters of provincial interest applicable to this application. Reaional Services Municipal water supply and sanitary sewer services are not available to the subject property. Community Strateaic Plan The proposal is consistent with Community Strategic Plan Actions including the promotion of alternative forms of energy. If you have åny questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. ¡ I /1 / i ; I ./ ! ,/ ; I //'. ,1 III. /1 / 1-\ /> //J/1,1i / f/f /! / _,=,,:vtl II> tv!! j Dwayne Campbell, Planner Current Planning cc: Regional Works Department - Peter Castell an N:IPIM\dc\ZoningICommentsIPickenngla02-06 : ,¡' ·:"I;>t"'I".f it /- "'{' ·.i¡,'..:'," ';Y_-,,,,..!e..,,._,U , r Pc: .~,.,~ß'L(~L,,_"", _~ 15n ;,'"',,,'C, TORONTO AND REG/ONt~ ", onserva Ion for The Living City May 3, 2006 RECE~VED BY FAX AND MAIL (fax. 905.420.7648) U 'i \,' ·1 ,', ''', {' t\ t' '~v~ ;H, :: ;j U ,¿ j t} t) CFN 37347.03 XREF CFN 37448 Rick Cefaratti Planner II Pickering Civic Complex One The Esplanade Pickering, ON L1 V 6K7 CiTY OF PiCKERING ?!.ANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Dear Mr. Cefaratti: Re: Zoning By-law Amendment Application No. A 02/06 Sandbar Road City of Pickering Pickering Harbour Company Thank you for the opportunity to review the above referenced Zoning By-law Amendment, received March 31, 2006. It is our understanding that the purpose of the application is to rezone lands located on the western end of the Eastern Spit owned by Pickering Harbour Company from an R-4 Residential Zone to an Open Space Zone allowing a windmill and passive recreation uses. The legal description of the lands is Lots 219 to 225, Lots 283 to 288, Part Lot 218 and 289, Plan 299. TRCA comments are as follows: rRGA Permit Requirement The subject property is adjacent to Lake Ontario and Frenchman's Bay. As a result of an update to provincial legislation, TRCA's existing Regulation was replaced by the Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation (Ontario Regulation 97/04) on May 1,2006. To implement this new Regulation, the TRCA has undertaken a conformity exercise and produced new mapping to identify the regulated areas. As such, all of the subject property continues to be regulated and a permit from the TRCA will be required prior to any development (e.g. construction, site alterations) within the subject property. The applicant has submitted Permit Application No. 083/06/PICK to the TRCA and this application is currently under review. Impacts to Wildlife Frenchman's Bay, like many of the coastal habitats along the Lake Ontario shoreline, provides important resting areas for migratory birds in spring that have traveled northward across the lake, and provides important staging areas for migratory birds continuing their journey south in the fall. Monitoring studies (by Dr. Ross James and Glenn Cody, enclosed) conducted following construction of the wind turbine at Hydro Marsh and on the CNE grounds demonstrate that the impacts to birds from these structures is not significant (2 or 3 bird deaths recorded during the 1 year study period compared to the thousands of birds that likely travel through these areas). However, there is still some contention over the design of the monitoring studies that were conducted given that observations did not necessarily coincide with high G:\Home\Public\Developrnent Services\Durham Region\Pickering\east spit wlndmill_1 wpd 5 5horeham Drive, Downsview, Ontario M3N 154 (416) 661-6600 FAX 661-6898 www.trca.on.ca r'ª\ 157 ., ,(¿,_"w_lO - ~q.~:~¥>"...,~.> ' Rick Cefaratti - 2 - May 3, 2006 levels of migratory bird fallout. Higher levels of mortality could occur during low-visibility periods such as at nighttime or rainy/foggy periods when birds are expected to seek land during migration. As such, we recommend that a post-construction monitoring study be conducted similar to those completed by Dr. James, with some modifications to his protocol which can be further discussed with TRCA staff, as follows: 1 . The surveys should be conducted during the first year after construction of the turbine during spring and fall migration by a qualified biologist. 2. The surveys should be conducted on days/nights when significant migrant fallout is expected to or has occurred, such as foggy/rainy conditions. Field surveys should occur in habitats in the vicinity to confirm that landed migrants are present and/or contact should be made with TRCA staff (i.e. Dan Derbyshire at Leslie Street Spit, 905.649.2208) to confirm fallout conditions are present. 3. The results of the survey should be analyzed and recommendations should be provided in a report to TRCA outlining whether there were a sufficient number of high fallout days surveyed in order to make adequate conclusions or whether further monitoring is required. The study should also make recommendations as to whether the turbine operations need to be modified to reduce wildlife impacts (e.g. turbine shut off during foggy/rainy days during migration). Dr. James' monitoring reports noted that impacts to bats was more significant than to birds. Eight deaths were recorded. As such, bat mortality surveys should also be conducted post construction during peak bat migration, particularly in the fall. This can also be further discussed with TRCA staff. Design Considerations (for the TRCA Permit application) In order to minimize design impacts on wildlife, we would like to confirm that the following elements will be incorporated into the design of the structure: 1. The tower type should be mono-pole and not a lattice to eliminate attraction by birds to roost on the structure. 2. The rotor position should be maintained in an upwind position, if possible. 3. Lighting should be eliminated to avoid insect, and hence, wildlife attraction. 4. A number of rare dynamic beach plants occur in the vicinity of the proposed tower. All locations of rare flora should be identified and mapped prior to construction by a qualified biologist. Any proposed impacts to these mapped species must be identified and if necessary transplanted to other suitable locations. 5. We have not yet received any information relating to the impacts associated with the installation of underground cable(s) to service the turbine. It is understood that the cable(s) will be directionally-drilled under the Bay. TRCA staff would like to visit the site with the proponent's Engineer and/or Ecologist to identify the location of construction staging, cable(s) and other areas of disturbance, and minimize their impacts. In addition, mitigation measures to restrict construction access to the adjacent natural areas (i.e. tree protection/sediment fencing) should be provided. 6. The proposed structure will be located on a dynamic beach. We understand that the regular maintenance of the barrier beach gap will result in temporary storage of the G:\Home\Public\Development Services\Durham Region\Pickering\east spit windmill_1.wpd 'i (;¡ ·:~·>'t~::11,"<.,_., ., 158 Rick Cefaratti - 3 - May 3, 2006 dredged spoil around the base of the new tower. However, TRCA staff would not support any shoreline hardening to protect this structure. Recommendations In light of the above, TRCA staff have no objection to the approval of the proposed Zoning By- law Amendment, subject to the following: 1. Tower type is limited to a mono-pole design and not a lattice pole. 2. Post-construction monitoring take place to TRCA satisfaction. We trust this is of assistance. Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions. Sincerely, ?7t A If /L- -;- ~~~ Heuchert, MCIP, RPP, MRTPI Senior Planner Planning and Development Extension 5311 enclosures cc: Ian McCullough, Marshall Homes (fax. 905.420.1600) Pickering Harbour Company (fax. 905.839.4380, without enclosures) Larry Field, TRCA (without enclosures) Dan Derbyshire, TRCA (fax. 905.649.1709, without enclosures) G:\Home\Public\Development Services\Durham Region\Pickering\east spit wimJrnill_1 ,wpd ~- .,.."·Z."",, {/()-¿b <> . ,-, ~~"'-. i ¡- ') 1. J 65.0 Metres 50.0 Metres ¡' ~"- ',,- ATTACHMENT' e TO REPORT I PD 1-/0 - O~ A02/06 Pickering Harbour Company Comparison in Size between Proposed Wind Turbine and Ontario Power Generation Wind Turbine at the Nuclear Power Station / /' ./ / //. ~// /' ,// /' ~/ //' v' ~ Proposed Pickering Harbour Company Wind Turbine Existing Ontario Power Generation Wind Turbine (Pickering) 160 117.0 Metres 78.0 Metres THE CfTY OF PICKERING PlANNING <i' DEVELOPMENT DEPAHTMENr. THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PlANNING <i' DEVELOPMENT DEPAHTMENT. INFORMATION <i' SUPPORT SERVICES, JUNE 7, 2006. 1. S 1 CilLf b~ REPORT TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Report Number: CAO 03-06 Date: June 26, 2006 From: Thomas J. Quinn Chief Administrative Officer Subject: Partners for Climate Protection Plan - City of Pickering Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program File: 0-1100-006 Recommendations: 1. That Council receives Report CAO 03-06, including Attachment 1 entitled "City of Pickering Partners for Climate Protection Local Action Plan" prepared by Greenpath and dated June 2006. 2. That Council adopt the following 10 year greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets as outlined in the Greenpath report: a) 35 percent per capita reduction in community GHG emissions by 2016 (from 1995 community emission levels); and b) 50 percent per capita reduction in municipal operations GHG emissions by 2016 (from 1995 corporate operational emission levels). 3. That Council approve the Municipal Operations and Community Local Action Plans outlined in Greenpath's report, as a basis and framework for proceeding with the City's GHG reduction program, and authorize staff to: a) implement, as appropriate in 2006, those recommended GHG reduction actions that can be carried out with available staff and resources, and within the approved budget; b) recommend specific GHG reduction actions for Council's consideration in subsequent years, through the annual City budget process; and c) seek funding assistance from FCM and other available sources to assist in further developing, implementing and monitoring the City's GHG reduction program. 4. That Council acknowledge and thank all project sponsors, working group chairs and participants and engaged community partners, and particularly those funding and in-kind sponsors, being the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), Ontario Power Generation, Enbridge, Veridian, the RDC Group, Greenpath, Energy Matters and Durham SustainAbility. Report CAO 03-06 Date: June 26, 2006 1 6'') -- {.. Subject: Partners for Climate Protection Plan Page 2 5. That a copy of this report be forwarded to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities; Ontario Power Generation; Enbridge; Veridian; Durham SustainAbility; the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority; the GTA Clean Air Council; Dan McTeague, MP, Pickering-Scarborough East; Mark Holland, MP, Ajax-Pickering; Wayne Arthurs, MPP, Ajax-Pickering-Uxbridge; Roger Anderson, Chair, Region of Durham; and all others interested in the City's GHG reduction program. Executive Summary: In February 2005, Council directed staff to coordinate the City's participation in the first three milestones of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities Partners for Climate Protection program. This program was established to encourage Canadian municipalities to be local leaders in greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions in keeping with Kyoto Protocol objectives. Greenpath provided consulting assistance for this program. Milestones 1-3 of the PCP program have now been completed. Greenpath, in consultation with City staff and our community partners, has prepared an inventory of baseline GHG emissions (Milestone 1), developed 10 year GHG emission reduction targets (Milestone 2) and prepared Local Action Plans for municipal operations and community GHG emissions (Milestone 3). Greenpath's final report is attached as Attachment 1 . Council's adoption of the GHG emission reduction targets and approval of the Local Action Plans (as a basis for moving forward with the program) will distinguish the City as a leader in local greenhouse gas reduction and energy management initiatives. Implementing specific GHG actions in subsequent years will further signal the City's intent to move forward in its journey to becoming a Sustainable City. Financial Implications: The total cost for completing this study was $114,000. The bulk of the funding came from FCM and our project partners (OPG, Enbridge and Veridian). The City's share ($4,500) was approved by Council through the City's 2005 budget, and carried forward into 2006. No additional costs to the City are anticipated in 2006. Future costs associated with specific GHG reduction actions will be considered in subsequent years, through the City's annual budget process. ~¡ ß Report CAO 03-06 Date: June 26, 2006 Subject: Partners for Climate Protection Plan Page 3 Background: The Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), in partnership with the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), has established the Partners for Climate Protection (PCP) program to encourage Canadian municipalities to become local leaders in reducing corporate and community greenhouse gas emissions. The PCP program is based on a five-milestone framework: 1. The completion of a greenhouse gas (GHG) and energy use inventory and forecast for the community and municipal operations. 2. The setting of local GHG reduction targets. 3. The development of a Local Action Plan to meet established reduction targets. 4. The implementation of actions identified in an adopted Local Action Plan. 5. The monitoring and measurement of actions and results. In February, 2005, Council passed Resolution #31/05, declaring the City's support for FCM's Partners for Climate Protection Program, and directing staff to coordinate the City's participation in that program through the completion of Milestones 1, 2 and 3. Greenpath was retained to assist the City in completing these Milestones. Work was done in close consultation with City staff and project partners. Greenpath's final report on Milestones 1-3 is attached for Council's consideration (see Attachment #1). Completing Milestones 1, 2 and 3 of the PCP program sets the stage for the City to continue into program implementation (Milestone 4) and monitoring (Milestone 5). Completion of the PCP program would confirm the City's position as a leader in local sustainable energy and environmental management practices in Durham Region and beyond, and establish a practical and progressive framework to address a number of important objectives that have been set out in the City's "Sustainable Pickering" initiative. GHG and Enerqy Use Inventory. Forecast and Reduction Targets The Greenpath report provides a 1995 baseline GHG emissions inventory for both Municipal Operations and the Community. It also provides GHG emission and energy consumption trend data to 2006. As well, the report provides forecasted information to 2016. The 1995 baseline and 2016 target years are appropriate, providing a ten year actual data baseline with trends, and a forecasted 10 year implementation timeframe to reach recommended targets (which is a practical timeline to complete initiatives and is in keeping with recommended Kyoto Protocol implementation timelines). From 1995 to the present, the trend has been a slight decrease in both municipal operations and community GHG emissions when measured on a per capita basis. If nothing was done and we continue on this trend, there would be some additional GHG Report CAO 03-06 Date: June 26, 2006 164 Subject: Partners for Climate Protection Plan Page 4 reductions on a per capita basis, but not enough to have much of an impact on overall GHG emissions. Greenpath therefore considered a number of forecast scenarios. In all scenarios, overall GHG emissions per capita in Pickering would decline. However, for Pickering to move forward as a leader in sustainable community development, Greenpath, in consultation with staff and our community partners, recommended more aggressive (but achievable) GHG reduction targets. These targets are based on an "integrated sustainability" scenario. In this scenario, municipal and corporate programs are integrated and coordinated in order to maximize resources and funding, and compound the effectiveness of separate programs through additional social marketing and organized implementation network. The recommended emission reduction targets are as follows: a) 35 percent per capita reduction in community GHG emissions by 2016 (from 1995 community emission levels); and b) 50 percent per capita reduction in municipal operational GHG emissions by 2016 (from 1995 corporate operational emission levels). It is recommended that Council adopt these 10 year greenhouse gas reduction targets. The proposed targets would establish a firm and responsible target that supports and compliments the City's Sustainable Pickering initiative. The following table summarizes the actual and targeted GHG emissions in the City of Pickering, as proposed in the Greenpath report. 1995 2004 2016 (actual) (tarqets) Population 78,300 94,200 141,000 Municipal Operations 7874tonnes 8840tonnes 7083tonnes GHG Emissions (0.1 tonnes/person) (.09 tonnes/person) (.05 tonnes/person) Community 633,428 tonnes 669,772 tonnes 744,634 tonnes GHG Emissions (8.1 tonnes/person) (7.2 tonnes/person) (5.3 tonnes/person) 1 6') Report CAO 03-06 Subject: Partners for Climate Protection Plan Date: June 26, 2006 Page 5 Pickerinq Municipal Operations and Community Local Action Plans The Local Action Plans outlined in the Greenpath report were also established in consultation with staff and program partners. Implementation of the various actions and initiatives described in the Local Action Plans will help ensure the City meets its 2016 GHG reduction targets for both municipal operations and the community. The recommended actions and initiatives are organized under five broad themes: · Sustainable Municipality · Sustainable Home · Sustainable Workplace · Sustainable Schools · Sustainable Transportation It is recommended that Council approve the recommended Municipal Operations and Community Local Action Plans as a basis and framework for proceeding with the City's GHG reduction program. Implementation and Monitorinq of GHG Reduction Initiatives The completion of Milestone 1, 2 and 3 of FCM's Partners for Climate Protection program sets the stage for the City to commence Milestone 4 (Implementation) and Milestone 5 (Monitoring). It is recommended that Council authorize staff to: o implement, as appropriate in 2006, those recommended GHG reduction actions that can be carried out with available staff and resources, and within the approved budget; o recommend specific GHG reduction actions for Council's consideration in subsequent years, through the annual City budget process; and o seek funding assistance from FCM and other available sources to assist in further developing, implementing and monitoring the City's GHG reduction program. The City of Pickering can playa leadership role, through our direct actions in reducing GHG emission in municipal operations, as well as by mobilizing, coordinating and facilitating project partners in implementing community GHG reduction programs. Proiect Partners This project would not have been completed successfully without the valuable input and support of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, our partners (OPG, Enbridge and Veridian) and our staff and the many corporate and community stakeholders that participated in the project. Special thanks to Jack McGinnis of the RDC Group and Durham SustainAbility for in- kind support and leadership throughout the project, including assistance in securing .; r\ I" 1. br Report CAO 03-06 Date: June 26, 2006 Subject: Partners for Climate Protection Plan Page 6 project funding from FCM, and to Terry Green of Greenpath (project consultant) and, Gail Lawlor of Energy Matters. Attachment: 1. "City of Pickering Partners for Climate Protection Local Action Plan", prepared by Greenpath and dated June, 2006. Prepared By: Approved I Endorsed By: ~/L Ron T aylor( ~ Coordinator, Business Development & Investment Thomas J. Quinn Chief Administrative Officer Thomas Melym k Division Head, Corporate Projects & Policy RT:TM:ljm Attachment Copy: Chief Administrative Officer All Directors Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City ~.øunc· ./ , ' , , 167 City of Pickering Partners for Climate Protection Local Action Plan A Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Strategy and Energy Management Plan June 2006 Prepared by: Greenpath greenpath@powergate.ca 168 PROJECT SPONSORS: Federation or Ci!:lnadlan ,Municipalities 0.. NTARIO.· "'~'····R.. .. .... .rUBt. GENERATION ., '." ., ;,~~ ", ;,,' }i'lt,,···· E'N'S R· IDGE ~~',,~5~;";( '. . '. .' . '. . ,.' . '. . · . ,'.. .... ,·:~;,:.\s;:,:;:~,,,~,,· ,_:,"" ,.. .. .. .. .. .~ VERIDIAN ih'£.' PÙr'oICJ to Jui.,~ y\'~w ht~lh:'r 16 ') QUI .~ ""0";¡'<'~~.;.'<"~.!·'.<.""...". ~·'··I\"'''·..".. 'E ... . ... 'C pCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN Contents Acknowledgments.......................................................... ....................................................2 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 3 Background...................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose of the LAP... .... ................................................ ......... .................. .... ... ......... ...... ..4 Climate Change - Local Actions in a Global Context ....................................................5 General Approach and Guiding Principles.................... ............ ..... ......................... ........5 Local Benefits.............................................. .................................................................... 6 Developing the Plan of Action.............................................................. ..........................8 GHG Emissions Inventory, Trends and Forecasts .......................................................10 Background.................................................................................................................... 10 Community Growth Plan............................................................................................... 1 0 Emissions Performance Indicators.................. ....................... ................................... ....11 Emissions Inventory Baseline...................................................................................... .12 GHG and Energy Management Trends................. .................. ........ ...... ........................ 14 Emissions Forecasts...................................................................................................... .17 Emission Targets...................................................................................................... .... .19 Action Plan Initiatives and Programs........................................................................... .20 Working Group Framework.............................................................................:............ 20 Municipal Operations Action Plan................................................................................ 23 Community Action Plan................................................................................................ 33 Summary - Program GH G Reductions.. ............................ ................ ...................... ...... 57 Recommendations and Next Steps........................................................... ................. ..... 5 8 Recommendations for Council...................................................................................... 58 Next Steps...................................................................................................................... 5 8 This study has been produced with the assistance of the Green Municipal Enabling Fund, a Fund financed by the Government of Canada and administered by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities. Notwithstanding this support, the views expressed are the personal views of the author, and the Government of Canada and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities accept no responsibility for them. Copyright © 2006, City of Pickering. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, recorded or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photographic, sound, magnetic or other, without advance written permission from the owner. Page 1 CiÚI 4 11.\ ~ PCPLOCALACTIONPI,AN Ii ;) _ t Acknowledgments This study has been conducted with the support of the City of Pickering and its partners: · The Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), which administers the Green Municipal Enabling Fund financed by the Government of Canada. · Enbridge · Ontario Power Generation . Veridian This Local Action Plan (LAP) report was prepared by Greenpath in consultation with the City of Pickering. The project consulting team included Terry Green, project manager and primary author of this report, Gail Lawlor of Energy Matters, senior advisor for the study and primary facilitator of the working group meetings. Project support, communications consulting and guidance was provided by Angela Wheeler and Jack McGinnis of Durham Sustain Ability (DSA), a local non profit sustainability organization. A special thanks to the many individuals and organizations that contributed to the development of this program. In particular, Tom Melymuk, Division Head Corporate Projects & Policy and Ron Taylor, Coordinator, Business Development & Investment for the City of Pickering who have championed this initiative from its very beginnings. Ron chaired the municipal working group and championed the project as the key representative of the City on the Project Team. This LAP report includes valuable input from five working groups that met a number of times from October, 2005 to March, 2006. The Municipal, Residential, IC&I, Transportation and Community Outreach working groups were chaired by Ron Taylor, George Armstrong ofVeridian, Susan Clinesmith of En bridge, Craig Oldman of Siemens Canada, and Jack McGinnis of Durham Sustain Ability, respectively. We wish to thank each chair and the representatives that offered their time and support to these working groups including city staff, local businesses (industrial, commercial, retail), local institutions (school, church, hospital), Durham Region, local and regional transit authorities, and community and neighbourhood associations. A special recognition is extended to the mayor and councillors who have given their full support to this program and to the overall Sustainable Pickering vision, which is paramount to the success of this action plan. Page 2 ... 17 '. 1 , Ci..Úf'/å .. "'1~~i~ iêibRlNt; pcp LOCAL ACTION PLAN Introduction Background The City of Pickering recognizes the importance of environmental stewardship within its municipal operations and within the entire community. In recent years, the City has been a committed partner within the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) Clean Air Council and has demonstrated its commitment to the environment through various ongoing programs such as park clean-ups, the Frenchman's Bay environmental program and establishment of an anti-idling bylaw. In 2005, the City's commitment to environmental stewardship and sustainable development was elevated to a new level with the commencement of a number of key initiatives: i) Creation of a new environmental co-coordinator position to support and develop environmental awareness programs within municipal operations (through the City's Corporate Green Committee) and in the community at large. ii) Commencement of the Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (SNP) project to provide a design framework for responsible development and integration of new neighbourhoods. iii) Development of the Partners for Climate Protection (PCP) program to provide a greenhouse gas emissions reduction plan primarily focusing on responsible energy consumption for municipal operations and the community, which this report addresses. The SNP and PCP programs are "sister projects" that are supported by the federal Green Municipal Enabling Fund administered by FCM, both commencing in May, 2005. iv) Establishment of a Benchmarking Sustainability initiative to clarify what sustainability means for Pickering, how to become a sustainable community and how to measure the progress on an ongoing basis. In order to support, co-ordinate and provide guidance for these initiatives, an "umbrella program" was developed called Sustainable Pickering. For further information on this program and these various initiatives, refer to City's website www.sustainablepickering.com. Page 3 ~tk ~Mmt·~~"J"I";.··.' Pi....... . 1 . - . - t; pCP LOCAL ACT! 0 N PLAN J '72 Purpose of the LAP The City of Pickering is committed to developing a sustainable community as outlined in the Benchmarking Sustainability program. A number of objectives have been identified to define what a Sustainable Pickering would look like: i) Healthy Environment ii) Healthy Society iii) Healthy Economy iv) Responsible Development v) Responsible Consumption The Local Action Plan (LAP) was initiated to identify greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction opportunities to enable the community to move towards its sustainable objectives. The objective of Responsible Consumption is particularly relevant for the LAP as well as viewing all opportunities through the three lenses of healthy economic, social and environmental benefits. The focus on GHG emission reduction targets and actions catalyzes progress in achieving a number of sustainable goals: i) An overarching goal that engages all sectors of the community fostering a healthier community social fabric. ii) Direct link with energy management and its long term economic benefits. iii) Direct link with reduction of air pollution and smog caused by fossil fuel combustion and its related social and health co-benefits. iv) Indirect link with many other sustainable environmental, economic and social benefits such as an increased local focus - employment, food, renewable energy, etc. v) Provides a global context through the Kyoto protocol while focusing on local tangible benefits. The LAP emphasizes the link with energy management and responsible energy consumption as viewed through the three lenses of sustainability. It also recognizes the importance of waste management, which affects GHG emissions through landfill methane production, and the importance of water management which directly impacts energy consumption and GHG emissions. Most of the initiatives are focused on the existing community and municipal operations; however there are several initiatives that target the Responsible Development objective with synergistic overlap with the Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan project. Page 4 1 7-': Cill¡ o~ ~"i .i"...."'.··",·..·.'...," ".' . .... ~:·:·_..':!I.;..."·..·... I.. . ..,...' PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN Climate Change - Local Actions in a Global Context Greenhouse gas (Carbon dioxide COz, Methane CH4, Nitrous Oxide NzO) concentrations in the atmosphere has been increasing significantly over the last 150 years and at even higher rate in the last 35 years contributing to tangible global climate change effects. This is mainly caused by human activity: primarily burning fossil fuels as well as creating landfill waste methane and removing carbon sinks such as forests. ~ Climate change is a global issue requiring local action, mainly in the area of responsible energy consumption. In Canada, FCM and the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) have developed a framework for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for municipalities called Partners for Climate Protection (PCP). The PCP program consists of five milestones: 1. Conduct a baseline GHG emission inventory analysis for municipal operations and the community. 2. Establish GHG reduction targets for municipal operations and the community. 3. Develop a local action plan outlining actions that reduce GHG emissions and energy consumption for municipal operations and the community at large. 4. Establish a program to implement adopted actions that will reduce GHG emissions and energy consumption. 5. Establish a monitoring and reporting system to verify GHG reduction achievements. Revise the action plan periodically to reflect new ideas and strategies. In May 2005, the City of Pickering launched the program to complete Milestones 1,2 & 3. Greenpath was contracted to assist the City in developing a program to complete these milestones and develop this LAP. When this report is reviewed by Council in June 2006, these three milestones will have been deemed to be completed. General Approach and Guiding Principles In order to ensure consistency and guidance for this project, a general approach with a number of guiding principles were established by the Project Team while aligning with the overall Sustainable Pickering program: ~ Engage community partners and the public - establish working groups representing all sectors and conduct a public forum for general public input ~ Foster diverse stakeholder collaboration through common over-arching goal - "doing our part to reduce GHG emissions for future generations" Page 5 Ciú¡ "I l!, ·"",·,m"",,:t"iR' ' Þm"": G PCP LOCAL ACTION PLfu'\¡ "'. '7A 1. ·t ~ Emphasize local benefits - provide tangible justification for action through the 'three lenses of sustainability' - economic, environmental and social benefits ~ Foster community ownership with local champions - e.g. Whitevale and District Residents Association - door to door compact fluorescent light bulb distribution ~ Engage "bottom-up" community-based social marketing - change behaviour through community-based programs - e.g. Durham Conservation Centre's (now Durham Sustain Ability) original Blue Box recycling program, Durham Region's water efficiency program ~ Support "top-down" leadership - e.g. City of Pickering corporate leadership, key programs by project partners - Enbridge, OPG, Veridian ~ Establish benchmarking, monitoring and feedback systems - Sustainable Pickering benchmarking elements includes GHG emission data, ongoing monitoring and community feedback through multiple avenues and channels ~ Lever existing programs - create efficiencies by integrating programs and combining top-down and bottom-up approaches ~ Focus on action - commenced initiatives in parallel with developing action plan e.g. Veridian Lunch n' Learns for IC&I sector; Municipal staff Lunch n'Learn sessions; Whitevale relamping program; Dunbarton-Fairport United Church energy efficiency retrofit with Enbridge assistance. Rosebank Road Public School and Dunbarton High School's commitment to implement the EcoSchools program ~ Challenge stakeholders to establish pilot programs - e.g. fuel additive program for improved efficiency and reduced pollution Based on these guiding principles, the basic approach was to engage as many diverse perspectives as possible including "blue sky" ideas, while being pragmatic and action oriented at the same time. Rather than an "either/or" mentality concerning ideas versus action, the project principles allows for honoring the multitude of motivations and perspectives of the stakeholders. Local Benefits One of the key principles is to emphasize local benefits. Without local benefits there is little motivation to act. However without an overarching goal such as greenhouse gas reduction targets there is little room to work together and align the diverse motivations and agendas of the residents, businesses, institutions, community organizations and municipal government. The topic of global climate change is quite abstract for most people, yet the overarching goal of greenhouse gas emission targets are tangible enough Page 6 ~l r~1r : : CitJ¡4 dm-c PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN to catalyze and align the many diverse perspectives of the various sectors of the community. However, this is not enough to enable and motivate stakeholders to act: the overarching goal must be translated to local benefits. "What does this mean to me, my family, my job or business, my community?" In keeping with the three lenses of the Sustainable Pickering program, the following generic local benefits of this program are grouped into these three categories and yet they can be and should be seen through all three perspectives: Economic Benefits · Energy and operating cost savings in all sectors · Physical asset renewal in municipal operations and private sector · Improved municipal service delivery · Reduced healthcare costs · Increased productivity and employee morale · Greater support for local businesses - significant multiplier effects · New local business opportunities in sustainable development sector · Local job creation in new "green" businesses and services Environmental Benefits · Improved air quality · More green space and trees in the community · Improved health of natural ecosystems · Reduced "urban heat island effect" · Better indoor living and working environments (e.g. improved lighting, better indoor air quality, reduced noise, increased comfort) · Doing our part in creating a globally sustainable future for our children and the planetary biosphere Social Benefits · Improved health of residents · Reduced traffic congestion · Increased community investment and services Page 7 Ciú¡ 4 i'b, ðf~~G PCPLOCALACTIONPLAN 17G . Opportunity for the municipal government to show leadership and influence other community stakeholders to take action . Greater sense of community; enhanced quality of life These are a few of the generic local benefits, and there are many more specific benefits that can accrue from GHG emission reductions and responsible energy management. A key project principle is that these local benefits as seen through the three lenses of sustainability need to be emphasized to fully engage collective action. Developing the Plan of Action In following the guiding principle of engaging community partners, a number of key steps were taken: A. Founding Project Partners Early in the process, Enbridge, OPG and Veridian stepped-up to be founding project partners providing valuable support for this project and completing the funding contributed by the City of Pickering and the federal GMEF administered by FCM. Durham Sustain Ability, a non-profit local sustainability organization, also provided valuable in-kind support throughout the project. B. Working Groups To engage diverse sector perspectives and knowledge, five working groups were developed during a public project kick-off workshop: Community Outreach, Industrial, Commercial and Institutional (IC&I), Municipal, Residential, and Transportation. Once chairs were established, each group met separately at least twice to brainstorm ideas within their relevant area and then to prioritize the initiatives using common criteria. In March 2006, all the groups met together in a workshop to brainstorm implementation strategies for each prioritized initiative including potential funding, responsibilities (coordinator and support), and timing. In all, over 50 community stakeholders representing a variety of sectors contributed their time to the program: from various City departments, small and medium size businesses, large corporations, energy companies, retailers, institutions such as school, hospital and church, Durham Region, neighbourhood associations, environmental organizations, transit authorities and organizations, conservation authority, residents and councillors. C. Public Forum In May 2006, A public forum was held in the form of a celebration at the Pickering Town Centre: Sustainable Pickering Day. This was an integrated effort that provided information on all Sustainable Pickering programs and initiatives with the support of Page 8 ~¡ '7 'j CitJ¡4 .,,,,,,";~~~ i~ miirNG PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN many exhibitors of sustainable technology, products and services as well as business sustainability presentations for the local business community. Public feedback was obtained through a "Passport to Sustainability" survey during the day. Page 9 CiUI ð~ if;. ~é!:~c PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN 1 11'1 GHG Emissions Inventory, Trends and Forecasts Background For PCP Milestone 1, a GHG emissions inventory and forecast was established for both municipal operations and the community. This work was done in parallel with engagement of community partners and stakeholders in developing a local action plan as part of completing PCP Milestone 3. PCP Milestone 2 requires the establishment of GHG emissions targets. The Pickering Council approved a resolution with provisional targets subject to the work in developing Milestones 1 and 3. This report recommends new emission targets based on this work. The Partners for Climate Protection (PCP) software was used to gather energy inventory data and convert this information to GHG emissions inventory. Greenpath utilized its forecasting model to develop several scenarios to arrive at a recommended emissions target based on Pickering's growth plans and its commitment to responsible consumption and development. A baseline year of 1995 was selected due to a number of considerations. The Kyoto protocol uses a baseline year of 1990, so in a perfect world 1990 should be used to mirror the protocol; however 1995 was the earliest year that community and municipal information was available. For trend analysis, the latest energy and waste information was gathered for the year 2004. A forecast and target year of 20 16 provides a 10 year window of opportunity from commencing the full program in 2007 based on PCP recommendations. Also, 10 years allows for a good portion of the substantial growth of the Seaton development with its significant effect on community emissions and energy management planning. Community Growth Plan The City of Pickering is in a unique situation in that much of its central and northern lands were expropriated by the provincial and federal governments in the early 1970's. The federal lands were designated for a new airport which is now being proposed in a downsized form as a regional airport. The provincial lands include a land swap with developers which will be part of the new urban development of Seaton, a development that may eventually double Pickering's current population of 94,200. As no development has occurred on these lands for several decades, Pickering's growth has been slower than most municipalities in Durham Region, however this now presents a tremendous opportunity for the City: as the Seaton lands open up to development in the next few years, there is an opportunity to develop neighbourhoods in accordance with new cutting Page 10 Ciú¡,'1 3 '7 '-1 ~(; pCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN edge sustainable urban designs as are being developed in the Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (SNP) project. Pickering's population is projected to grow by 50% from 2004 to 2016 as part of the Seaton expansion (see Figure 1). This represents 80% growth from the baseline year of 1995. 160000 140000 120000 c 100000 0 ;; ftI 80000 "5 c- o 60000 c. 40000 20000 0 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 Year Figure 1: Pickering Population Trend and Forecast Emissions Performance Indicators The GHG emissions data is much more meaningful when translated into performance indicators. A key indicator used in this study is GHG emissions per capita, mostly per population or per household, which is used as the key basis for forecasting. Some relevant performance indicators developed for this study include: Municipal Operations: 1995 52.6 112* 697* $1,435 2004 53.2 129 685 $2,233 Municipal building floor space ('000 square metres) Municipal fleet vehicles (excluding APTA buses) Municipal Employees (including part-time) Energy Cost ($'OOO/yr) * Not available in 1995, used 1999 data Page 11 CiIJI"~ ,'Ii m~G PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN ,^^ -) ló, Community: 1995 2004 78,300 94,200 23,872 29.346 1,298 31,000 Population Households IC&I building floor space ('000 square metres) IC&I Employees Emissions Inventory Baseline Emissions inventories were established in 1995 for both municipal operations and the entire community through gathering energy and waste data. Municipal Operations - Inventory Baseline In 1995, municipal operations produced 7,874 tonnes ofGHG emissions from energy usage that cost $1.44 million. On a per capita basis, this equates to 0.10 tonnes per resident. Refer to Figure 2 for a breakdown of these emissions by sector. Municipal buildings use by far the most energy. Water and sewage operations are not included here as these operations are owned and operated by Durham Region; however they are included in community emissions. Streetlights 180/0 Corporate Waste 4% Vehicle Fleet 11% Figure 2: Breakdown of Municipal Operations GHG Emissions by Sector (1995) Refer to Figure 3 for a breakdown of emissions by energy source. Electricity is by far the largest source of energy followed by natural gas. Page 12 Cw¡ o~  18'¡ Þ~è PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN Fuel Oil Diesel 3% 8% Natural Gas 22% Gasoline 4% lectricity 63% Figure 3: Breakdown of Municipal Operations GHG Emissions by Source (1995) Community - Inventory Baseline In 1995, the community generated 633,428 tonnes of GHG emissions from energy consumption and waste disposal. On a per capita basis, this equates to 8.1 tonnes per person. Refer to Figure 4 for a breakdown of these emissions by sector. The residential building sector is the largest consumer of energy followed by the industrial, commercial and institutional sector and vehicle transportation. The community produced 77,797 tonnes of waste of which almost 17.6% was recycled. The remainder that went to landfill produced 30,872 tonnes of GHG emissions. Transport 24% C ormrumÏty Waste 5% Residential 40% IC&I 310/0 Figure 4: Breakdown of Community GHG Emissions By Sector (1995) Refer to Figure 5 for a breakdown of emissions by source. Natural gas represents the largest source followed by electricity. Page 13 CilJlr.'~ j~ ~~~G PCP LOCAL ACTION PLA.1'1 /, 8 'Î i ' -.. l,... Gasoline Propane 17% 1 % Diesel 10% Fuel Oil 5% Electricity 31% Natural Gas 36% Figure 5: Breakdown of Community GHG Emissions By Source (1995) GHG and Energy Management Trends Energy data and indicators were collected for both the baseline year of 1995 and in 2004 for trend analysis. To ensure a meaningful comparison of GHG emissions in each year, the same electricity GHG coefficient was used. In Ontario, this coefficient can change dramatically year to year based on the annual mix of primary sources of electricity generation, from utilization of nuclear and hydro power with no GHG emissions to use of coal with the highest GHG intensity. According to Statistics Canada, the Ontario electricity eC02 (equivalent CO2) emissions coefficient was 0.123 kg e CO2/KWh in 1995 and this has more than doubled to 0.272 kg eC02)/KWh in 2003 (latest year of publication) as a result of changes in mix of electricity generation sources. This has a major skewed effect on the amount ofGHG emissions generated from electricity consumption and trend comparisons are not useful inusing these different coefficients unless energy consumption numbers are used instead of GHG emissions. For consistency of the performance indicators, the most recent coefficient data provided by the PCP software will be used for all electricity eC02 calculations so that baseline, trend and forecast are based on the same greenhouse gas intensity for electricity generation. (For Kyoto compliance purposes, the GHG emissions are calculated using the actual coefficient data of that year which has been reserved in the database). Municipal Operations - GHG and Energy Management Trend Refer to Figure 6 for a comparison of municipal operations GHG emissions in 1995, 1999 and 2004. Most notable is the vehicle fleet fuel consumption and emissions have risen by 34% and streetlight energy consumption and emissions have risen by 22%. Page 14 Ciú¡ ð~ ~G PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN "'-8·· ') .-. .. . 10,000 ¡ 9,000 CI) ~ 8,000 Ë 7,000 ~ 6,000 III C 5,000 o 'm 4,000 'Ë 3,000 w CJ 2,000 J: CJ 1,000 o 1995 1999 Year 2004 [] Corporate Waste o Vehicle Fleet o Streetlights . Buildings Figure 6: Municipal Operations GHG Emissions Trend By Sector Some of this increase in emissions is due to an increase in level of services for a population that has risen by 20% from 1995 to 2004 such as the increase in street lighting. Refer to Figure 7 for the per capita trend in corporate GHG emissions and energy management. 0.120 III S 0.100 ïñ 111- 'Ë S 0.080 w ~ CJ CI) J: ~ 0.060 CJ CI) ns c =[ S 0.040 ns~ (.) â) 0.020 Do 0.000 1995 1999 Year 2004 f!Ð Corporate Waste o Vehicle Fleet o Streetlights . Buildings Figure 7: Municipal Operations Per Capita GHG Emissions Trend By Sector Per capita emissions from buildings have dropped by 15% as there has been no significant new buildings constructed except replacement of a few facilities, which is reflected by only a 1 % increase in floor space. The vehicle fleet per capita emissions has Page 15 'Q.Af _i. V '. CÚI :I lëb.c PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN increased by 11 % due to increases in fleet size which has outpaced the population growth. One of the most significant trends is that total energy costs have risen dramatically from $1.4 million in 1995 to $2.2 million in 2004: a 50% increase in 10 years. One quarter of this increase is due to a net increase in energy consumption. Community - GHG and Energy Management Trend Refer to Figure 8 for community GHG emissions trend from 1995 to 2004. Even though the population increased by 20%, residential GHG emissions and energy consumption declined by over 7% mainly due to a reduction in natural gas and fuel oil consumption which suggests improvements in space heating for both existing homes and new home construction. Emissions from transportation rose significantly by over 22% as a result of the trend of increased "vehicle kilometers traveled" (VKT). 800,000 E£I Waste o Transportation olC&1 . Residential - ... :g 700,000 :>. ~ 600,000 c g 500,000 - - ~ 400,000 o :~ 300,000 .fi 200,000 C) :I: 100,000 C) o 1995 2004 Year Figure 8: Community GHG Emissions Trend By Sector Transportation emissions slightly increased more than the population growth by about 2%; however rounding shows it to be constant in Figure 9 below. Refer to Figure 9 for a per capita trend analysis by sector. Page 16 ¡ Q " CiÚ{ o~ ' ~mG PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN 9.0 8.0 . Waste o Transportation OIC&1 . Residential UI C o '¡¡¡ 7.0 UI_ .- C ~ g 6.0 ~ ~! 5.0 C) ß 4.0 - c ns c :ä, 0 3.0 ns:::' o 2.0 ~ CÞ Q. 1.0 0.0 1995 2004 Year The residential sector saved 23% in energy consumption on a per capita basis on the strength of primarily space heating improvements (programmable thermostats have made a significant impact) and some electricity gains through replacement of appliances, etc. Emissions Forecasts A number of scenarios were run based on the per capita trend analysis for actual GHG emissions from 1995 to 2004 and scenario forecasts to 2016. The following is a summary of the scenarios: Integrated Sustainability Same per capita emissions as 2004 - 0.094 tonnes/person Same % improvement from 1995 and 2004 - 0.085 tonnes/person Current Improvement Trend plus focus on reductions in new infrastructure - 0.069 tonnes/person Current Improvement Trend plus focus on reductions within existing infrastructure - 0.068 tonnes/person Focus on both Responsible Development and Responsible Consumption - 0.050 tonnes/person No Change Current Improvement Trend Responsible Development Responsible Consumption Page 17 ~~~ iLKhlill~'G PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN .i g¡'~ 1 ) Municipal Operations - Emissions Forecasts Refer to Figure 10 for representation of the various forecast scenarios to 2016. - s:: ~ 0.120 , ~ 8. 0.110 ~ 0.100 s:: g 0.090 - G 0.080 a 0.070 .f! 0.060 'Q. ð 0.050 :¡¡ 0.040 Il. 1995 19982001 2004 2007201020132016 Year -+- No Change ___ Current Improvement Trend Responsible Development: """"':'''- Responsible Consumption: -*- Target - Integrated Sustainability Figure 10: Municipal Operations Per Capita Forecast Scenarios and Target The per capita target of 0.050 tonnes/person represents a 50% reduction from the 1995 baseline of 0.1 0 1 tonnes/person. On absolute terms, the 2016 target is 7,083 tonnes, which represents a 10% reduction of total GHG emissions despite an increase in population of 80% from 1995. Community - Emissions Forecasts Refer to Figure 11 for representations of these forecasts and the target. _ 8.5 s:: o ~ 8.0 Q) c.. ~ 7.5 s:: s:: .s 7.0 - C) J: 6.5 C) :ê 6.0 c.. ca () 5.5 ~ Q) Il. 5.0 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 Year -+- No Change ___ Current Improvement Trend Responsible Development: -''''','- Responsible Consumption: -*- Target - Integrated Sustainability Figure 11: Community Per Capita Forecast Scenarios and Target Page 18 Cill¡ o~ ll;, '87 .~~.... 1 ~.G pCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN The per capita target of 5.3 tonnes/person represents a 35% reduction from the 1995 baseline of 8.1 tonnes/person. On absolute terms, the 2016 target is 744,634 tonnes, which represents an 18% increase in total GHG emissions despite an increase in population of 80% from 1995. In keeping with the principle that the City must be a leader by example, municipal operations has a more stringent per capita reduction target of 50% versus the community per capita reduction target of 35%. Emission Targets Refer to Table 1 for a summary of recommended GHG emission targets for the community and municipal operations. This is based on the targets associated with the "Integrated Sustainability" scenario outlined above. The targets are stated on a per capita basis due to Pickering's growth potential in the next 1 0 years and more. The table provides both per capita targets and corresponding total targets based on the growth in population as forecasted in the City's official plan. Table 1: Per Capita and Total Emissions in 1995 (Baseline) and 2016 (Target Year) and Total Gap from Target (Tonnes) 1995 2016 Total Per "No Per Per Target Total GHG Capita Change" Capita Capita Total Gap GHG Total Target Reduction from Target Municipal 7,874 0.10 13,239 0.05 50% 7,083 6,157 Operations Community 633,428 8.1 1,003,229 5.3 35% 744,634 258,595 Wide Actual progress to-date (2004) shows that the municipal operations per capita emissions have been reduced by 7% to 0.09 tonnes/person. Community-wide emissions have been reduced by 12% to 7.1 tonnes/person. Page 19 - PCP LOCALACTION PLAN 18S Action Plan Initiatives and Programs Working Group Framework The process of engaging working groups was crucial for this program. It provided the means by which the program could accomplish several objectives: 1. Engage community partners and foster early stakeholder buy-in and involvement. This is crucial for the implementation and monitoring stages of the program (PCP milestones 4 & 5). ii. Develop a broad spectrum of ideas from multiple sectors and perspectives. iii. Prioritize ideas based on a broad level of experience and expertise. iv. Integrate and cross-fertilize ideas and stakeholder relationships. v. Focus on actions and "low-hanging fruit" through pragmatic implementation strategies and a 'just do it" attitude. The working group categories were established at a public project kick-off workshop, which also provided the context for enlisting interest in working group representation. The following working groups and chairs were established over the first two months of the project launch: Municipal: Ron Taylor - Coordinator, Business Development & Investment, City of Pickering and City representative on Project Team IC&I: Susan Clinesmith - Manager, Business Markets Development, Enbridge, a founding project partner Residential: George Armstrong - Manager, Regulatory Affairs and Key Projects, Veridian, a founding project partner Transportation: Craig Oldman - Account Manager, Siemens Canada, a project sponsor Community Outreach: Jack McGinnis - Chair, Durham Sustain Ability, a founding project partner Over 50 community stakeholders volunteered from a large cross section of local organizations and businesses to form these working groups. The first four groups were categorized by sector to ensure that a broad cross-section of community representation was engaged in the process. The Community Outreach group was formed to provide an all encompassing perspective on community engagement and to address areas that might not fall within the other four sector categories (e.g. agriculture). Four Sector Working Groups The four sector working groups met twice each and were asked to meet two objectives: Page 20 ," "I . c.lI¡"~ .4·· ¡ 1MR PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN 1. Brainstorm ideas to reduce GHG emissions and to provide local benefits. 2. Categorize and merge ideas into project initiatives and prioritize them. The process of prioritizing initiatives required a common set of criteria that was simple enough to use without impeding the process and yet had enough complexity to make the prioritization process meaningful. The project team developed the following key criteria which was used to rate each initiative in order of favourability (1, 2, or 3): Cost: Sub-categories: program and end-user Effort: Sub-categories: program implementation and end-user implementation Impact: Sub-categories: GHG reduction, economic and other (including program awareness, social, and other environmental) Timing: Sub-categories: short, medium and long term Over 40 initiatives were prioritized by the four sector working groups and these in turn were sorted as a whole and in some cases merged together and/or renamed to establish a "short list" of 25 prioritized initiatives. The summary of the working group meetings including the matrices used for prioritizing initiatives are posted on the City's sustainability website www.sustainablepickering.com. Community Outreach Working Group Community outreach is not a community sector but a critical function within this program. Therefore, this group had a somewhat different purpose as it was focused more on the "how" than the "what". The four sector working groups were fonned to establish what needed to be done to reduce GHG emissions and provide local benefits. The Community Outreach group was formed to address how these initiatives could reach the community in the most effective ways such that success rates were maximized. The Pickering "community" includes residents, businesses, institutions and community organizations. The Community Outreach group met on five occasions to address the following objectives: · Identify effective ways and channels to reach the community that fosters action · Brainstorm marketing and promotional ideas · Develop criteria for prioritizing community outreach efforts · Prioritize sector working group initiatives using this criteria Page 21 CÚlo# ,À ~ PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN "\ ,', ''I !_ ,j il · Integrate prioritized initiatives into larger community outreach programs The following criteria were established for prioritizing initiatives requiring community outreach support: · Timing - focus on short term only within next year · Program Cost · Focus on Success (foundational) · Community awareness · Measurable action · Representative (initiatives from different sectors or cross-sector) Once the initiatives were sorted based on the first four criteria (the last 2 were checks only), a number of prioritized initiatives were integrated together into larger community outreach programs. These programs are based on "bottom-up" community-based social marketing to effect behaviour change and "top-down" leadership by example and incentive programs (eg. financial, recognition, etc). Five major programs were established: 1. Focus on conservation in the home - starting with green bin distribution in July, 2006 -lever as a channel for energy conservation action 2. Focus on conservation in the workplace - starting with Lunch n' Learns 3. Focus on schools -lever provincial EcoSchools program and local programs 4. Focus on residential transportation - starting with anti-idling program 5. Focus on land use - starting with coordination of tree planting programs and addressing new development (eg. SNP project) These larger scale community outreach programs each include a number of prioritized initiatives or "subprograms" that were addressed by the four sector working groups. These five programs were given names by the project team that align with the Sustainable Pickering theme and are straight forward enough such that they are understandable by anyone in the community: 1. Sustainable Home 2. Sustainable Workplace 3. Sustainable School 4. Sustainable Transportation 5. Sustainable Land In addition, the municipal operations initiatives that are not specifically addressed by the Community Outreach programs have been integrated together and called "Sustainable Municipality" . Page 22 1 9 of ~ . -- 1 Uú¡ ,.¡ .A. .~ PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN Municipal Operations Action Plan Page 23 Ci/J¡ .~ Â. "''''~¡;t'''~''~I,..!g... Þr "".",' .1 ... ..' ,l; pCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN f~9¿) -=- . ,-'-- Municipal Operations Action Plan The following municipal operations action plan provides proposed initiatives that the City can implement to reduce GHG emissions as well as create many local benefits. These actions were prioritized by the municipal working group, however each program initiative will require further study and quantification prior to being presented to council for approval. This municipal action plan named "Sustainable Municipality" provides sustainability leadership for the community by reducing municipal energy costs and GHG emissions and by delivering social, health and environmental benefits for City employees and the community it serves. Page 24 Citq 0/ .Â, "\. 9 (... 1IiØf!!¡MM' ~~." .:t. .... . . r", '. i~ I 1"'''' I ") rt5ï· .' ~ .. J.~ _ ..' ..... G pCP LOCAL ACT! 0 N PLAN i. Lighting Retrofit - change to efficient T8 fluorescent lamps and LED EXIT signs ii. Lighting Controls - Automatic occupancy sensors throughout the building and photocell sensors for automatic control of exterior lighting and interior light level in specific locations. rarn DeVelÔrnent Civic Complex audit performed by Siemens Canada. Capital cost estimated at $240,000. Next energy audit required for Recreation Complex which comprises more than 50% of all munici al build in floor s ace. ,~)t-:¡;;;,jjI:çQrtômic åndOthÊ}f'E3êhéfit$.i;},.· A 3.5 year payback from energy savings plus reduction in maintenance costs. Also results in improved illumination levels and less eyestrain I improved ability to control workspace and task lighting, and improved colour rendering. These social and environmental benefits reduce stress and improve roductivit . 1;mfme1ir'tê .... Complete Civic Complex retrofits by end of 2006. . Potential FÜndin"; Veridian PowerWISE incentives for relamping. Page 25 Annual energy savings of $68,000 and electricity reduction of 58%. G - Gg~â.l.Ìõt¡õrfŒªr··"~~$':;i Civic Complex: 430 tonnes per year starting in 2007. Other existing buildings: 1130 tonnes per year by 2008. Cú¡ o~ II; ~c PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN 194 ··'16i'NÎû'diCi":är.~m':lôY'êê'E'CJ!QicãitiB'í1~ñêl¡ÂW~fêHê~s"}',\,ir'~~:!~~i:!; Work has already started in this area led by the Coordinator, Environmental Awareness Programs. Lunch n' Learn sessions have been organized on home energy efficiency. Sessions have been facilitated by Durham Sustain Ability. Veridian rovided ener efficient Ii ht bulbs and ni ht Ii hts. Included in other programs. City of Pickering, Veridian, Enbridge City of Pickering's Coordinator, Environmental Awareness Programs and Corporate Green Committee with support from Durham Sustain Ability and Veridian. Page 26 Î q t~' Ci~~1 .Å -'- .) ..~ PCPLOCALACTIONPI.,AN ,I- '\~:;f~;o;:..,# .; ~f! ,{1r"" a(~¡m;~U'l.H Over and above the water conservation and waste management efforts conducted at municipal offices, this initiative includes the installation of recycling receptacles in high traffic areas such as arenas (including change rooms), sports fields and parks. It also includes the use of recycling bins at all city events (and events held on city property) such as Frenchman's Bay Festival, July 1 st celebration, Art Fest etc. Water use can be reduced with water efficient landscape such as drou ht tolerant arden Part of City leadership campaign in community. Little incremental cost. 'vGHG;R~dÛ6tiQn'i'"Får"~t$'Ht1:i To be uantified. Rês'åñ'šibnn City of Pickering's Operations & Emergency Services De artment Page 27 Clil c~ ,It, ~G PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN I9n Page 28 Lever FCM/AMO buying group for group discounts. ""'é·!R.ês City of Pickering's Supply and Services Division and Corporate Green Committee .., 9" Ciú¡ ð~ A. ~ ~~G pCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN ,.:2. .. -.if'...'''..''''. ~~:f~;'I"l.ij.:, I The OPA Conservation Bureau recognition program can be leveraged here or an additional municipal program created. Purpose is to provide public recognition to local businesses, schools and institutions for their efforts to be sustainable and reduce energy and waste. Communication and feedback can be conducted through multiple channels such as city website, councilor and cit newsletters... Proposed new Sustainability Officer position to develop program (refer to the Integrated Sustainability Program (no. 2) in the Community Action Plan). No si nificant incremental costs. ·,·····Ecönomicånd·ÜthérBähefifs, ,,' Provides the IC&I sector will added incentive to become more sustainable based on public recognition and community awareness. Leverages success of other ro rams. ~']irl1élillê ··n;;i"'PQ·t~ntiàlhf;"Ylìél ¡h'··'!!~~;'¡,;~.iRØsLQ.ri$iÞmf 2007 City of Pickering, with City of Pickering's support from the OPA proposed new Conservation Bureau. Sustainabilit Officer. Page 29 No significant incremental costs. '·GHG. RècfûctiòhTår 'êís!,¡;i Included in Sustainable Workplace programs (refer to Community Action Plan) CitJ¡"~ ..Á f?~G PCP LOCAI,ACTION PLfu'\¡ .; 9'-...· .!.. ð ·m1·f~:;:Mu:niçJ··-årNliw::Q'Uiìa.iñ":·_$fãna.âra".Ji..;i;'¿;"',i/( Leadership in Environmental and Energy Design (LEE D) standards have become a common framework for other municipalities to encourage integrated building design. It is proposed that the City mandate a minimum of LEED Gold for all new municipal buildings. It is critical that the City lead by example by stretching to a slightly higher level than the LEED Silver rating being required for new IC&I buildings in the communit . City to review LEED Gold rating with Canadian Green Building Council who launched LEED Canada certification in 2005. In first year, over 200 applications received many of which are for Gold standard. Capital cost is 2- 3% hi her but declinin . 1!~~~8ê'ónÔmib'ânä'Øthèr:.Benêfifs·-F· '.'>~'\;."~">-...,-, '¡".- "'-'0"'-""'_ ,-, "',..-". ...." " .. ,', .... ....: ',-." "_' .·,<.·,·...-·.'.,..c,,··,..'c ........ ", ".,' ., At least 20-30% energy cost savings plus many environmental and social benefits. Creates visible leadershi for the Cit . ¡§'·7;[;Jro~J¡i1~,\¥··''1;j-:8ºt~f1tiªI.B".ºl'1qfÔ . For next City, Enbridge, municipal NRCan building. Page 30 Significant operating and maintenance savings creates a sound business case. -.GHG Reducti()n:.:r~r -'ets.:::;' 2500 tonnes per year by 2016. \¡f;i')~ ,',R銷ohsjPi.li City of Pickering's Planning & Development and Operations & Emergency Services Departments ..¡ n.... _f. : 1 Ciú¡ -I I . ~.(; PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN I. Alternative fuels - review biodiesel and natural gas conversion options. Natural gas requires infrastructure that could be installed by Enbridge. Also City could provide a "green incentive" to city taxi cabs. A taxi fleet conversion usually has a pay back of less than one year with rebates. Fleet vehicles that use gasoline should use a 10% ethanol blend. This will be mandated by provincial and federal governments in the next few years for all gasoline. ii. Efficient fleet - need to initiate study on each fleet vehicle - currently report fuel consumption per vehicle only - require kilometers, trip and cargo log - assists in assessment of possible rationalization of fleet and optimum size of vehicles. iii. Fuel efficiency - Lever first hybrid vehicle purchase - review case for additional hybrids (possibly biodiesel) or smaller fuel efficient vehicles. Also, conduct pilot study on fuel additives (Jomini has committed to this) and fuel tank chip. Page 31 Ci.u¡ ð~ À" mm··'''..' In ~'..~.___." ~~'"',: "''',mC PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN The GHG emissions per vehicle have been reduced by 9% over the last 5 years, however the number of fleet vehicles has risen by 15%. As the vehicle fleet has net per capita increase in emissions over the last 5 years, significant action is required in this area which calls for a stretch target of a per capita reduction target of 50% GHG emissions by 2016 equating to reduced operating costs of $160,000 er ear. 'z<RÖfêfitiâtÆ£ûOdih ,', ,.'",,, ". ,- .;..,~,.".,.". ,', , ............ .,.. '." .. " ........ ',' NRCan, City of Pickering, Enbridge, PST rebate Initiate in 2006/2007. Page 32 :200 Recent improvement: 1 Hybrid vehicle - 1 tonne per year starting in 2006. Fleet target: 990 tonnes per year by 2016. H,;ßßsJ. 'ºrj.$¡~ilit··'~";ì0i~' City of Pickering - led by Operations & Emergency Services and supported by all City departments. Additional support by Enbridge, NRCan, Jomini International "'j . 't ~ .", '! LiÚI"~ ,- ....' '. -,... ..,!' . ~.G PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN Community Action Plan Page 33 Ciú¡ ð~ iJi. ~ PCPLOCAi,ACTIONPLAN 202 Community Action Plan The following community action plan presents GHG reduction initiatives that have been integrated into subprograms for funding purposes and into larger sustainability programs in order to be more effective and cost efficient. Some initiatives and subprograms will need further study and quantification before they can be funded and implemented. In addition to the Sustainable Municipal program, there are five community programs: Sustainable Home Sustainable Workplace Sustainable School Sustainable Transportation Sustainable Land Each of the community programs requires a concerted community outreach focus. However, it was apparent at the integrated working group meeting held in March 2006 that an overall coordinating role was required in order to make the community outreach programs more effective. The project team has called this overall coordinating function "Integrated Sustainability". Integrated Sustainability It was suggested at the integrated working group meeting that was organized to address implementation issues and strategies, that a full-time position be created (preferably administered by the City) that would coordinate these programs. The founding project partners, Enbridge, OPG, and Veridian, as well as Siemens Canada were willing in concept to fund this position on a multi-year contract, subject to agreement on the position's key objectives in addition to normal corporate approvals. This provides a multi-tiered approach to effective and successful implementation: Initiative (Tier I): A specifically targeted action that results in a measurable outcome. (eg. home relamping initiative in hamlet of Whitevale - door-to-door CFL distribution) Subprogram (Tier 2) Multiple initiatives that can be funded together. (e.g. Responsible Electricity Consumption funded by Conservation Fund and Veridian CDM programs which includes the Whitevale relamping initiative) Program (Tier 3) Multiple subprograms that are integrated into one community outreach program to substantially increase effectiveness - reduces cost, increases success rate Page 34 () .) f) Ci~.~ {". ~-'mRi.NG PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN (e.g. Sustainable Home program which includes Responsible Electricity Consumption subprogram and other Home subprograms to eliminate duplication of effort) Integrated Sustainability (Tier 4) Reduces cost of implementing each program by providing an overall cohesiveness to the programs to enhance economies of scope (eg combine elements of Sustainable Home, Sustainable Workplace and Sustainable Transportation and Sustainable Land programs while facilitating Lunch n' Learns for employees). Page 35 Ciú¡ "~ ~è PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN ..,-) 4 ~< .~ . This overall community-based program targets responsible consumption within the existing community and responsible development for a growing community. In order to make this program cost effective and successful, all programs and subprograms must be integrated and coordinated as a whole even though they're administered separately for funding purposes. A key principle to this integrated, layered approach is to compound the effectiveness of each subprogram through "bottom-up" community based social marketing that emphasizes behavioural change utilizing natural and organized networks of residents and organizations, while simultaneously utilizing a "top-down" approach of financial incentives, promotions and forms of reco nition for each sub ro ram. rain.peVeto ¡neìif Requires a new full-time position at the City (or alternatively at a local sustainability organization) - for purposes of reference in this report this position will be called a "sustainabilit officer". ;'3WÆdl2~Ôn'ôll1ic'àñd."·O.fn~bE3~ï1Øfits',;;, An integrated program will leverage and create efficiencies between the subprograms. Cost savings and increased rates of success will be apparent but difficult to quantify. Total cost of position estimated at $80,000 per year on a three year contract for ease of funding. Ai?J3H GRedÜètÎôr1'T:år ". è,ts'¡;ßt ,', '" '. . ,,' ........ ',' ...........,. ....,,', .. .-..,.......-.... Difference between integrated sustainability scenario and following current improvement trend. 70,500 tonnes per year by 2016. Veridian, Enbridge, Siemens, OPG and provincial overnment Coordinated by proposed Sustainability Officer and supported by all City departments. Also supported by Durham Sustain Ability and fundin artners. Page 36 ') ;\ { ,I Ciú¡ 4 ¿, ·'·"··f""MR"'1!\I¡,>·""¡'·""'·"· ~ '~"'.""\!<ìòI,~I",,,,'''J.,:, I ,. '" "., ' pCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN This initiative leverages two existing programs: i. Ontario Conservation Bureau and PowerWISE programs _ discounts for compact fluorescent lights, programmable thermostats, ceiling fans, electrical timers, air conditioners, water heater and air conditioner tune- ups, peak saver program, water heater tune-up, etc II. Energy Star appliances - includes above discounts on air conditioners and ceiling fans plus working with specific retailers to provide incentives. This is an integral part of a coordinated community based social marketing (CBSM) approach that will focus on changing behaviour at a rass roots level in existin homes. " ",'pro "'rãníÐeV:elèf"m~ntA~'¡""¡)i'rr~"l!;r: í)t""õiñ" Requires a City "sustainability officer" Estimated cost of to coordinate. Develop specific this community electricity conservation program and based subprogram apply to the Conservation Fund. Co- is $50,000 per year. ordinate with Veridian and local retailers. Achieved average home electricity usage reduction of 15% between 1995 and 2004. An additional 25% savings is achievable in existing homes by 2016. This equates to a savings of $230 per household at 2005 electricit pricin : Ti fr¡eli he Pofêñtici ,'Þ'dr1è:nri' .., Launch by Ontario Conservation end of Fund, Veridian, Siemens 2006. Canada, selected retailers such as Home Depot, Sears, etc. 20,500 tonnes per year in existing homes by 2016. Durham Sustain Ability (DSA) supported by City, Veridian, Siemens and retailers. Page 37 GÚ¡ ð/ !~ ~~ PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN ,r-'¡ ,-)' ¡~ I:;. !} This initiative leverages two existing programs: v. Enbridge TAPS (programmable Thermostat, kitchen and bathroom Aerators, Pipe wrap and low-flow Showerhead) program - door to door initiative to install energy saving devices vi. Enbridge $100 rebate for purchasing an Energy Star (high efficiency) furnace This is also an integral part of a coordinated community based social marketing (CBSM) approach that will focus on changing behaviour at a grass roots level in existing homes. <,Pro· rÇln1 Peveto Integrate TAPS program with overall CBSM approach. Achieved average home natural gas consumption reduction of 26% between 1995 and 2004. An additional 30% savings is achievable in existing homes by 2016. This equates to a savings of $290 per household at 2005 natural as ricin . :}!,TrimeHr:"Iéìi, !(>..,..., ···.'··."·,,·<,·,'·,,-';,¡,·..··-;":r; Launch by end of 2006 Enbridge, Natural Resources Canada, selected retailers such as Home Depot and Canadian Tire. Durham Sustain Ability supported by City, Enbridge and retailers Page 38 ~\ ·.é CitJ¡ 4 ill, ~~. I~G PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN "'~~~6~aôm'é~g~I~~ªõ~¡;;l;'õ,'r"^';"'i~J¡1jiç¡J'<~~;~¡~Œ~\I~fq~~~~~~::¡..¡,,;~III¡~ This program was originally intended to support the federal EnerGuide for Houses audits and energy retrofit grants. With the recent cancellation of the federal program, the provincial government is considering a subsidy to homeowners for the audit process and possibly retrofits. In the meantime, EnerGuide for Houses evaluations can still be promoted with the full cost covered by the homeowner. Toronto Regional Conservation Authority (TRCA) and Home Depot have also launched a computer based Do-It-Yourself home audit ... PrO' ram Develo Requires Sustainability Officer to market and coordinate with DSA for delivery of home evaluations. The main benefits are reduced space heating costs which has been primarily quantified in the natural gas subprogram. The average energy savings is 30% for those who have implemented the home audit recommendations. j.&';r.'.¡·.I·.....,.~.·.·.J".;e·".· · ··.h.···e·i:ì¡.. .r,;j,nlj,.r.'.····.·.I;1.'.'o·.···..t·.·..e..··.·. tn·.·t·.I·..'.·at:.I··.,.··.t:'u.,··.'n···"......·.· ·I·.·n' ""'.:'''.'' J;~';,r'I~ll . . ~nJ':~:,,:~,:,'tJI.~:~ Irk ,'; .:" > .;tlL';, ,,' ,'. u,~,~;; Launch Veridian, Enbridge, by end Provincial government, of 2006 TRCA and Home De ot Cost of marketing of program and the home audits is recovered in the fee to homeowners and possibly subsidized by overnment ro Refer to the natural gas subprogram. Page 39 ~A ~~,¿- IêKÈÏfu\ìt; PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN ~~08 vii. Durham Region's Water Efficiency program - Outdoor water use program uses effective CBSM delivery methods to target high water use neighbourhoods. Program also includes literature and displays at garden centres and special events for reducing indoor and outdoor water use. Enbridge's TAPS program (see sub-program 1 b for details) and Veridian's water heater tune-up (see sub- program 1 a for details) ram'Develo Sustain ability Officer to coordinate with Durham Region. No additional costs. ;;;(¡;.i.·EcøÁbmicål1d·Other·13èÔêfifS>'· Key benefit is overall awareness of responsible consumption of water levers responsible behaviour for ener consum tion. .:~mimêlirìê.; .B8¡j:~¡i·pøténtiál.Fllñâi r'f'¡N0;i:i;4 ·;Rêš· "onsIPilit¥ '''~.,..."..."". ...., ;"~"" . ..',.......... 'j""'-, " '.'.'-' ,_ :',<".'-.': .,',..,. ",.,,', ,',-,.'. :.."."..... . ...... ',:.' .-Ú',,'·,.." ",;.:<,': ,_..... .': '",',:.,.': ,'-',' ,':. . "_",v.,"h< Launch Durham Region, DSA supported by by end Enbridge and Veridian Durham Region, of 2006 Enbrid e and Veridian. No dedicated cost allocation for this initiative. GHG'Rédl1èfiÓrt"[ar' êts To be quantified by Durham Region. Page 40 2D~ PCPLOCALACnONPLAN This initiative leverages an existing program: ix. Durham Region Green Bin program for the curbside collection of organics, starting July 1 st, 2006, Information about home energy efficiency included with the green bin and a compact fluorescent (CFL) bulb from Veridian. Coordination with the Region to locally promote the use of the green bin as well as energy conservation. ~';:¡,¡~«E;êºnOroic'."Et·hg"Ç)thên,aêl'lefitš';,:.<,:~:f'iG8..~"'..R~q¡JGtiP'r1:~;¡~f·"'·!9"t~'!; . . Durham Region targets Key benefit IS overall awareness of ·d t· I t .' resl en la was e responsible reduction and d,' t f 60°1 . . f. IverSlon ra e 0 /0 diversion 0 waste which levers h· h t t .' W IC equa es 0 responsible behaviour for all home d t· f 23 400 . re uc Ion 0 conservation efforts. t ' onnes er ear. RêsdhšiþHj Durham Region with support by City of Pickerin and Veridian No ongoing cost allocated to this initiative. ;JíQièJinê" " Launch July 1, 2006 , ',potêritiäkEuridiri Durham Region, Veridian (CFL bulb and brochure) Page 41 CÚI _I å -m.C PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN ,'" '" ;) ~':'1 u i\Ql~~~~r "õ1iJn$l~~f.{eW~aom~f:¡ Pickering's Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (SNP) Program has proposed the use of the LEED-ND framework to guide the construction of all new homes and neighbourhoods in Pickering. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System® is a voluntary, consensus-based national standard for developing high- performance, sustainable buildings. The Neighbourhood Design (NO) is a new initiative of the US and Canadian Green Building Council. Further details about this program are available through the SNP documents. Local builders are already constructing homes to the energy efficient Energy Star level and incorporating innovative technologies such as solar water heating and geo-thermal heating. City of Pickering to develop guidelines for more stringent housing standards for all new homes developed in Pickering. Recommend new homes be built to minimum Energy Star standards. Support and promote local builders who are already building to this standard. j¡~'¡" It,', ÓdrtQr;nic,år"ldOthèrSSr"le,"fit$" . . '.... ,.,. .... ....... .......' .......... ", ........., .. . . Energy savings of 30-40% versus a standard new home. New home construction quality and comfort dramatically increases. ~íW,iittg jò.ê;,:;~\eþtèntiål,..,f%;QQªjf1' 'Rji¡~'; 2007 None required. Currently adds about $3500 - $5000 to cost of standard new home although additional cost is declining as more Energy Star homes are built. The monthly energy savings well exceeds the increase in the home buyer's mortgage a ment. ;";Ç3'P/G.""Redl.lÔtipg,J"áføl$,);,j' 56,000 tonnes per year for new homes by 2016. Page 42 211 ~G PCPLOCALACTIONPLAN x. Enbridge Business Solutions - multiple programs/audit services, incentives and rebates for the industrial, commercial and institutional (IC&I) sectors. xi. Veridian and PowerWISE Business Incentive Programs that initiate energy conservation and load management projects through rebates and incentives Performance contracts with Energy Saving Companies (ESCOs) rartlDêvelomêr:if' Sustainability Officer to coordinate. Segment and prioritize target market. Building size, or anization size, etc. q¡~~Ii.p,ÄijQfñiqi;ªñp·,Øìñe'~~1a~õ'~fit . Pickering buildings represent over 1.3 million m2 of floor space. The sector reduced per capita GHG emissions by 9% between 1995 and 2004. A Equates to retrofitting 25% further 9% reduction by 2016 is of existing buildings. quite achievable. The average building retrofit provides a payback of less than 5 years with an average of 30% energy savings. Improvements in indoor environment (temperature control, air quality) results in im roved roductivit. :Jll11êliné ·,POtêntiáIFûnâin.·· .':;"¡ Launch Enbridge, Veridian, by end ESCOs of 2006 . .·i> ..... . ,....;Or,oin Requires co-ordination of programs and focused targets. Estimated cost $25,000 er ear. > ·fI·~'¡,.R.~ô·ð'ªtr9D':~~r~ . 16,000 tonnes per year from existing buildings by 2016. City of Pickering's proposed Sustainability Officer with support of Veridian, Enbridge, ESCOs, Ajax-Pickering Board of Trade Page 43 Ciú¡ ø~ ,Â. ~G PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN ""1° l~ t:.. 'î~Þ~fEm··"·fo.;"ê;Ê):t:(fûçâ:tiqñ:fiñJêJT~*ª]Í'fi;n~ªª.;'iJ~"]ii~.fî~~;~!:',~;~~¡; Providing staff education and awareness programs at work benefit both the employer to ensure compliance to business energy conservation plans and helps reinforce the value of energy conservation for employees in their home. Both local utilities provide an education service to their IC&I market: I. Veridian has hired a Lunch 'n Learn facilitator and offered this free service to local businesses. ii. Enbridge provides training for "influencers" of energy conservation programs such as engineering consulting firms. In addition, the provincial government has provided the opportunity for all sectors of Pickering to participate in their annual Energy Forum. A targeted IC&I Energy Forum has been suggested as a means to boost the uptake of local businesses to benefit from the knowledge, incentives and rebates offered b the utilities. Requires a coordinated marketing program on behalf of the utilities. 'J' ,Ec,qrìå'ì"nÎciánd.Othèrßen§fits . Reinforces and levers other Sustainable Workplace, Transportation and Home initiatives. ,'¡]j[rmªlih~" Started Veridian, Enbridge in Dec 2005 Page 44 Cost of education programs is free to businesses - part of utility CDM/DSM ro rams. G,HG,.ReqU,¢fiotl:T:'ª/" "êt$" Quantified in other subprograms. Part of market penetration strategy for building retrofits. Durham Sustain Ability with support from Veridian, Enbridge, Ajax- Pickerin Board of Trade í) 1 :~{ CiUI ø~ . II; {.. ~G PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN Presently there are both provincial and federal recognition programs that can be leveraged for the purposes of Pickering's Local Action Plan. The Conservation Bureau of the Ontario Power Authority (OPA) awards their Certificate of Recognition for Energy Conservation to those who demonstrate leadership and take action to conserve energy in Ontario. The status of federal programs relating to energy conservation is unknown at this time, but it is anticipated that new programs will be developed in the near future. Public recognition is an excellent motivator for many businesses and institutions. Usually enhances what is already a very good business case. Taken into account in other subprograms. Conservation Bureau of the OPA, NRCan (possibly) Coordinated by City of Pickering's proposed Sustainability Officer and conducted through Pickerin Cit Council Page 45 Citq .~ ·"'~~!l~ ~t; PCP LOCAI,ACTION PLAN e'1 I:' 4 ~4-êt:f1('RØš""'o'ñ'sil)l¡'¡"Ñêw/'a'~11'" .¡Î:Ì'"'~f[jêvêlø'· "rnQnt~¡!;r-~lt;;~W;¡11ìn,1:"'\~!f~;!ì!¡'" Leadership in Environmental and Energy Design (LEED) standards have become a common framework for other municipalities to encourage integrated building design. It is recommended that the City require a minimum of LEED Silver rating for all new commercial and institutional buildings. Many businesses are already designing more energy efficient buildings. OPG opened a new building in Pickering in 2005 that was 38% more energy efficient than standard design and won the first place Award of Excellence from Canadian Design - Build Institute. "Œr>,Pxo"'ramDevel.o Planning Department to review other municipal programs with LEED criteria for new buildings and integrate best elements and incentives from the most successful programs. The incremental capital cost of LEED Silver is approximately 2%; however incremental costs are declining as it becomes more acce ted and standardized. ;¡@{~~Eèôr1b'roid;âhd·,.'©thêr;E3ênêfitST ..",.,' ,,,:,,<:<:-,- "-. "., ,..,,',(',-;.'-.'-', '. ..'. ".'. .C',.; .. ',.-,'.', .: _./. -'-,' ':<co:,'-" ,',:c. ...." ,,' ',': <,:.,~;......" '.<;, ',.c,_.. .~ LEED Silver rating reduces energy consumption by at least 20%, but it can be substantially greater. Many environmental, social and productivity benefits from this inte rated desi n. i¡Rtril'1_~Ji nÈ#'-"~"::; Pôtêl"}fiâJFLíQgiij Launch Enbridge, NRCan in 2007. Integrated as part of permitting process. LEED building operating and maintenance costs are substantially lower than standard buildings. .:GHG RedµçtiÓr:fTar~ts.·. OPG building - 800 tonnes per year starting in 2006. Page 46 '. ., ,... ;- .l~) Ciú¡4 mm-C PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN j$~7~E.çø$ç·fi·qé$U¡?·"~r~.J¡~ìF':¡ic'f~.JIT~'WIÉ¡;~¿'. The Durham District School Board (DDS B) has adopted the Ontario EcoSchools program as a means to help schools play their part in responding to the great challenge of living more sustainably through the reduction of their energy use and waste production. As a new, voluntary program it takes time to engage individual schools, staff and parents. Through Sustainable Pickering two schools (Dunbarton High School and Rosebank Road Public School) have recently committed to becoming EcoSchools, with the goal to engage all Pickering schools within the next two years. EcoSchools supports the development of an EcoTeam consisting of representatives from staff, administration, custodial services, students and arents, which hel s ensure its success at all levels. råmDevêlo "'nienf~ ,. EcoSchool program is already developed. Engage first two schools already signed up to lead by example. :.:·'.Ëdônoniicähdi()therBt3tlêfit~······· DDSB already has an energy and waste management system in place with regular feedback and reporting to all schools. Tangible improvements will be measured, however the intangible learning opportunities (by example and through curriculum) levers and impacts all other Sustainable programs, which is difficult to measure. '·,.inialiné ······Pôtéhtiå I. FUOdif'l Pilot DDSB program program support. launched in May 2006. Page 47 Recognition program already in place with DDSB. No additional cost except EcoTeam volunteer time and effort. GHGH.êdÛctiôh,Iår···$tš',;; Included in Sustainable Workplace GHG reductions for buildings. Other reductions through this program are difficult to quantify. CiUI 4 tf.... pm.C PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN ;.~16 EcoSchools primarily deals with energy use and waste reduction though it encourages schools to develop other programs such as anti-idling, the "Walking School Bus" and water conservation measures. Many schools have concerns for children's health and the environment by the number of parents who idle their vehicles while waiting to pick up children. Signage, education materials and enforced local anti-idling bylaws need to be developed to support the schools. Better still is the creation of safe routes and walking buddies to encourage walking/biking to school. OPG has a "Green Sprouts" program which provides $200 per classroom for tree planting. Pine Ridge Secondary School has created a unique program called "I am the change" which encourages leadership amongst students. One of their first programs is an anti-litter cam ai n at their school and ad'acent ark. Add new initiatives to recognition program. No additional ongoing costs - based on volunteer efforts. New initiatives can act as a pilot program for the community at large (eg. anti-idling zones at schools to selected community target zones). Can have a significant leveraging effect but difficult to uantif. ';íi<·::,·>,:,;;,T'·· ''''1''' . <..> ........ 'p"'t ··t':"I·[:< 'd' ~\"";:;'i:~''',II,rne l Jet ., '9 ~nlaru.n "1.0 Commence in City of Pickering, 2007 with OPG, Siemens EcoSchool pilot Canada, TRCA program. (new school design) Anti-idling initiative quantified in Sustainable Transportation program. Ré$ City of Pickering's proposed Sustainability Officer with support of Durham Sustain Ability and DDSB. Page 48 '.. 1 I " ..~ c;ú¡~ ~G PCPLOCALACTIONPLAN !rSãfî!1J1nÎiH~fhn~' ¡....,,'....,.. ,.' ',"', ·'0.·.....;...... ,,' There was a consistent message from all sector working groups to deal with vehicle idling in targeted zones for both private vehicles and fleet vehicles. The City of Pickering has an anti-idling bylaw in place, but it was suggested that it be modified and enforced with more stringent criteria including a fine. This initiative is being addressed by the Coordinator, Environmental Awareness Pro rams at the Cit of Pickerin . ,.f,~" t~;mt~~v~JQ·'M"'Qî'. Requires revision of bylaw and Enforcement would be minimal cost for signage in incorporated into existing targeted zones. duties. Volunteer programs such as at schools (refer to 5b) can be hi hi successful. ~·..s;Ecårtornic.c:ind·Othêfl3~J'ßfitsi::~.' >,XGR<3Rê'di'íçtiÔri[ar";et$~:i~j;' Reducing idling by 5 minutes per 6,900 tonnes per year by day results in annual fuel savings 2016. of $50-$100 per vehicle. Reduced air contaminants are a significant benefit in high vehicle intensity zones such as schools, drive-thru restaurants and pick- up areas at public transit stations. ,~Ii¡.peIj6e;;f ..;~",}:POteo.tiàljRYfiqin 2007 Municipal, OPG Based on reducing idling time by an average of 5 minutes per day. ¡Rèš City of Pickering's Municipal Law Enforcement Services and Coordinator, Environmental Awareness Pro rams Page 49 .~ PCPLOCALACfIONPLAN ;) 18 There are a wide variety of options for residents to reduce vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT) and improve fuel efficiencies, and many of these programs are already in existence, however they need more profile in the community through a CBSM approach. For example: Enbridge has successfully launched a corporate car/van pool program including a "guaranteed ride home" if you need to leave work early. Other companies could emulate this program. OPG has a shuttle bus service operated by Durham Transit, to provide frequent rides between the Pickering GO station and local OPG facilities. It also provides inter- office shuttling services during the day. This has resulted in a GHG emission reduction of 460 tonnes per year. xv. Many companies are encouraging flex hours, telecommuting / work from home and use of satellite offices to reduce the time lost to commuting in rush hour. Also included in this initiative is the promotion of alternative transportation (e.g. bicycling to work), use of fuel efficient vehicles (e.g. hybrid vehicles, smaller vehicles/engines) and fuel efficiency products. Improved driving habits and trip planning can also produce significant results. Pickering is a commuter community with a ratio of 0.33 local jobs to population. GO train service is at capacity during rush hour but buses are under-utilized. GO Transit and Durham Region Transit acknowledge that when transit is convenient and comfortable people will use buses and trains. Program 4f looks at the long term infrastructure changes that need to be considered to provide more capacity and improve service. Page 50 "::1 (',' t., . ~ pCP LOCALACTION PLAN To be included in the integrated sustainability program. Estimated cost of $25,000 per year to coordinate program. This initiative focuses on a CBSM approach to behavioural and attitudinal change with support of existing programs. The key to this program is a well coordinated strategy that integrates well with the community-based Sustainable Home initiative. 1~)~¥Eèonõmiê;râffa ~ÖtnÊ:~<rll3~nëfitš:W" .'\':.._,...,..:,.......:.........,.,:._"....:,...,',.._..".,-,,.:- ..."..,,,··.·,...:····._...'.···..,·.·.··,,,,,··.1·,,,"·,_',' .:c.:,··...-. Energy consumed for light vehicles has remained the same from 1995 to 2004 on a per capita basis equating to GHG emissions of 4.2 tonnes per household. A resident transportation target of an 18% reduction by 2016 is feasible which equates to $300 annual savings per household. ~mi,mêJiD~1í'<tt};·¡~i'!R(itª6tiªI~R~ti.ajfr ·~TI~W;j.i1jlf'·ß.ª§'ºJ-îŠJPiJr" 2007 To be determined. Durham Sustain Ability with support of Smart Commute Group (Durham wide), City of Pickering and Durham Transit. .GHG'RedúalQ'h<râi' e'ts';,< 27,200 tonnes per year by 2016. Page 51 CU¡ol A· J . 'Ii ~~~........ ICKE_c PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN '~ /-'0 /.., ,_I . 'g~;~)"'Ecònqmicål1d¡Øtt'lªr'ßêpfifits{i;,F;; Energy consumption from light and heavy-duty trucks and buses remained the same on a per capita basis from 1995 to 2004. The same residential per capita reduction tar et of 18% b 2016 is feasible. .iWimèliñê!' ·'~t\;f'.·i;PötèlìtiâíFûl'1dirì .... ·¡i./j;~i'.·ReS'··ÔrišIbilr "-,' --, . :.- ..... -";'->. .. '-: ',,-:--.::,-""". ':- .,' ..... .- ::.. -,- '-".. .. ,',. ,-":" ".",.-, ',', '.-- . ',', : ',-:' ....." :"".. ".... ....,'. ,-' ."....,. . p 2007 NRCan, Enbridge, Jomini City of Pickering's International Inc. proposed Sustainability Officer with support from Durham Sustain Ability, OPG, Enbridge, Jomini, Ajax Pickering Board of Trade. ,·t6c;2;R~$'·· "Ôri~·i61.e,!F.f~'ê~;iM~ðª"·'~'ffl'i'õl:!?'¡f¡r'··,.,~,[\~r, The industrial, commercial and institutional sector (IC&I) has many existing programs available to help reduce GHG emissions, such as: Smart Driver Program (NRCan), employee incentives, fleet conversions (Enbridge), and fuel additives (eg Jomini International Inc.). This initiative includes sharing success stories (CN Rail's use of Jomini's fuel additives), and case studies that demonstrate fuel savings through targeted messages at business Lunch n' Learns and awareness pro rams includin its h brid vehicle. ramPèvel(j';.ri1êiíJ;,ii,!':;,t';!;iW,· . y',")'::!}i(jffi":"'olÎ)f Sustainability Officer to integrate Part of lunch & learns program with IC&I building retrofit and other Sustainable awareness. No additional cost. Workplace initiatives _ no additional cost. G H<3Réql.Jeti()riTãf ii' èt$ . 15,500 tonnes per year by 2016. Page 52 ¡) í)1 '" /... CW¡ ø~ ~G PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN i:'S" '''¡;;r''''S' '~''i":;~'~'''':' ''''''1'-' "t,f'i1t"" ~',~!i!. ,.llþr;J;(lifiJl'm·Lt'lr~.< There is current activity pursuing improvements for pedestrians, bicyclists and local transit, such as the proposed 401 Pedestrian Bridge to link the GO train station with the city centre (mall, city hall, and intensive housing (high rises, condos and town homes), more bike lanes and walking paths (City investigating involvement with an international conference on encouraging walking and cycling, Toronto, 2007); increasing GO train capacity and GTA fare integration with smart cards h newl established Sustainability Officer to coordinate initiatives with various City departments, Durham Transit, GO Transit and GTAA. '.... ,,:EC()nd'rniC' and.·.Othêr'iSêhéfifs',i, ¡,,'Y Each initiative would need to be quantified separately, however short term infrastructure improvements will support the success of residential commuter ro rams in 6b. '''''r'.,<.".", "<'''''«<''i'''''' <, t,,·, <, E"'''''' ,', 'i~11Im$ltneh:¡L:';~*iIHotentlª 15nQ DQll'Ì 2007 Municipal, Federation of Canadian Municipalities, GO Transit, Durham Transit Coordination of current initiatives, no additional cost. GHG'RèqùÞtiQn~¡ar éts., Included in 6b. City of Pickering's proposed Sustainability Officer with support of transit or anizations. Page 53 Ci/i¡.¡ A ~G pcp LOCAl, ACTION PIAN ,).) I) (" I..., l... i':$~~'~R,ø~"·"'ºiîs.¡bl~it1fºij'"'·iil"~rm;~njfrªst~uçtÖ·rø'.øªV~~~º·"~m¡ñ~¡~Q;frt Newly formed Greater Toronto Transit Authority (GTTA) will be responsible for transit integration between regions and the City of Toronto. Long term strategy options include Light Rapid Transit lines that have both north/south and east/west connections through Durham and York regions, and a 407 corridor transit strategy (including studying feasibility of a magnetic-levitation train system between Pearson and roposed Pickerin air orts). ~;:~Ü~~igtô 'réÌhtDévé,.lo" Jl·l~ntu.(~:.;, A key initiative is the formation of the GTTA, which will lead program development; however it's important for the City (and Durham Region) to strongly influence these long-term strategies especially with the potential explosive growth of Seaton. t~Êçonc3.m¡Òana'Qfhér'·'aê.h,~fitsn'f~~li~(3.Þ/G,.ßéäI.JQtiºh;'1['ªr·,·~t To be quantified with various To be quantified with various o tions. 0 tions. ·H~IJ:irrié,l.iné:"?ótenfiál··. Fllrldingé$ 2012- Sustainable GTTA with support of the City 2016 Development of Pickering, the Region, Technology Siemens Canada Canada (part of NRCan) Page 54 ') I) 'J CiÚ{~~ ~ (,.,¡".J !Þ~C PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN '¡iiI!ar~~flS'~e' ~';¡"i1'!'·lin~···:·'ii ~::r~,~.,;}:~~:~\:I,;I~:. .:!FJ~....",~ ,;',' The Toronto Regional Conservation Authority (TRCA) in partnership with Ontario Power Generation (OPG) has created many opportunities for local tree plantings, especially around Frenchman's Bay. This has resulted in some 4700 trees and shrubs planted in the last 3 years equating to 33 tonnes per year of C02) absorbed continually for the next 80 years. This has been a very successful program that will be expanded to other areas. One area of focus is to plant more shade trees around schools and public buildings to cool and reduce air conditioning use. Another area is to promote other existing programs such as planting a new tree for every City tree that must be cut due to a e, condition, or interference with overhead wires. ;~·':;',:I?ro··'ra. ffi"Oe.velo .'.> . "->-'- ........:~:::...:.'><._,. ,'," "". ',.:." .....:.""" City's proposed Sustainability Officer to coordinate and provide recognition for existing and new initiatives. ~¡~Ë ··!Ôrfmiê·;ân·d;Øther;Bêñê·firš·,i;~~ "'... ,,9 . Q;., ......v· .. .. . . .,..".",.......;1'\.v. Strategic placement of shade trees not only saves GHG emissions but reduces energy consumption for air conditioning in the summer. OPG/TRCA has saved 33 tonnes of GHG emissions per year since 2002. A target of tripling that effort by 2016 is realistic. ~;·Rot~nti,ªI'.E.urt'd.iIr···· '~laB~~' ºQ,~.i.Hinf·· TRCA, OPG, City of Pickering's proposed Municipal Sustainability Officer with support of TRCA, OPG No additional costs - based on volunteer efforts and City/TRCA/OPG staff. ÞIG:iRed uaiôri~T är'ëfs~~;; "'.,f>. <^.,;,:'.'."'..",,,_ ......,...,......,_:.".., ;. "_,.,,,,;'.- <'.","'"","', :: ""'.':::", :",",-.,i 1 00 tonnes per year by 2016. Coordinated program launch in 2007. Page 55 - PCPLOG\LACTIONPLAN ····)4 {.~ ,....." :¡7b;~)Rês.""·.õnªib't~'r:alÍd:'l)sê':'t)'êŸ~.lö·';'mint'.'¡f¡~''','t;~i'!~~:'>:'1~J~?0~¡t''i';::~f!~j¡:;2 Urban sprawl is a challenge for most municipalities. Pickering has chosen to manage its anticipated growth with a smart growth management plan that includes the framework of the Leadership in Environmental and Energy Design _ Neighbourhood Development (LEED-ND). As described in Program 1 f New Houses LEED-ND sets a very high standard for home construction and neighbourhood integration within a real community context. Dillon Consulting, through the City's Sustainable Neighbourhood Plan (SNP) is working with the Cit on this lead in ed e rowth Ian desi n. ~,:;¡n¡'?p,rb 'råmPøve,le> .mßñt.' SNP design document is nearing completion in which there will be recommendations for next ste s. Costs to be uantified. 'tk'E," ',êõ'rj:ð i'ffiqJâõéf'. Qtffef:'Elßi;1'ª,f.its ' '-"'-,',-,. ..'" ,...,..........., "-, ...-,..-...,....._-.....'._.'..".. .... .. ..... " Houses in the SNP design will be between 50% - 80% more energy efficient than standard design. Many other social and environmental benefits of this unique nei hbourhood desi n. ?[,imeline.;'8ôté'ntia, 1 I? lIndiri'., ' .. ...... ,- .0..0 ",_', ,"', _....,.." ,_, ,.', ..;,..'.,......".0 2010- FCM, City of 2012 Pickering Based on SNP recommendations. ,¡ct'D(3 - GRe.duêtiPO.:rãJ Partially quantified in Sustainable Home section based on Energy Star rated new homes. Additional 38,000 tonnes per ear if SNP is ado ted. ,~~~ '(jlìŠibHi, Dillon Consulting with support from City of Pickering's Planning and Development Department and Durham Sustain Abilit Page 56 I) ,) ":~ (.cc í... . , Ciu¡ .~ ~....." ¡, "~... ,.,,;, í ~",.... . . .... ..]]......' . ,"','" PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN Summary - Program GHG Reductions Municipal Operations The municipal operations target requires a total GHG emission reduction from 1995 baseline of 6, 157 tonnes by 2016. The contribution of the various Sustainable Municipal programs provides reductions of 1130 tonnes from existing buildings retrofits, 2500 tonnes from new buildings, 990 tonnes from fleet management and an undetermined amount from other programs. With a current reduction of 0.01 tonnes/yr as of 2004, this equates to a total per capita reduction of 0.04 tonnes/yr with another 0.01 tonnes/yr yet to be quantified to achieve the target reduction of 0.05 tonnes/yr. Although relamping street lighting could theoretically provide a reduction of 0.01 tonnes/yr, the peak loading in Ontario is such that reduction in electricity in night time non-peak hours does not appreciably reduce GHG emissions as this tends to impact GHG-free nuclear power generation loading. Also, new off-peak hour electricity pricing will reflect this reality as smart meters are installed, so the economic case will also be less attractive. As the other programs are quantified such that they further compound savings in building and fleet efficiency, the remaining 20% reductions to achieve target will not be overly burdensome. To put this in perspective, roughly 2/3 of potential energy savings in buildings is from operational/behavioural changes and 1/3 from capital retrofits. Only the retrofit changes have been taken into account thus far. Community The community target requires a total GHG emissions reduction from 1995 baseline of 258,595 tonnes by 2016. The contribution of the various community programs provides reductions of 141,000 tonnes from the Sustainable Home program, 41,000 tonnes from the Sustainable Workplace and Sustainable School programs, 50,000 tonnes from the Sustainable Transportation program, and 38,000 tonnes from the Sustainable Land program. With a current reduction of 1.0 tonnes/person as of 2004, this equates to a total per capita reduction of 2.9 tonnes/person, which exceeds the target of a 2.8 tonne/person reduction. Page 57 CÚI ~A, . 1É:r<i1.C PCP LOCAL ACTION PLAN 2:1<; Recommendations and Next Steps Recommendations for Council The following are recommendations to council concerning adoption of milestones 1, 2 & 3 of the PCP framework: 1) Adopt 1995 as the baseline year and 2016 as the target year for GH G inventory and forecast calculations. The GHG emission inventory and forecast information presented in this report completes the PCP requirements for Milestone 1. 2) Commit to reduce GHG emissions for the entire community by 35% on a per capita basis by 2016 from 1995 levels, which will include a 50% per capita reduction in municipal operation emissions. This commitment completes PCP Milestone 2. 3) Adopt this PCP Local Action Plan as a working document in proceeding to the next stage of implementation of programs and initiatives. Adoption of this report completes the requirements for PCP Milestone 3. Adoption of this report does not commit council to the approval of specific implementation initiatives. Initiatives and programs that require council approval will be submitted at a later date as part of Milestone 4 (implementation stage) when further program quantification and funding is ascertained. Next Steps There are many implementation suggestions in the action plan, however the following next steps are the most pertinent: 1) Obtain funding for the creation of new full-time position to coordinate all sustainability programs outlined in this action plan plus other relevant initiatives under the Sustainable Pickering program. Private sector funding could potentially be ascertained for this position on a three year contract. 2) Develop a phased implementation plan with estimated start-up costs and operating costs for each program. 3) Continue to engage stakeholders and potential funding partners for milestone 4 program implementation. 4) Develop funding strategies and applications for relevant programs. 5) Develop a budget for any of the above work that needs to be contracted. Page 58 REPORT TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Report Number: CS 34-06 Date: June 26, 2006 From: Gillis A. Paterson Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer Subject: Adoption of Pay Assurance Recommendation: 1. It is recommended that Report CS 34-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be received; 2. That the City of Pickering amend its standard Subdivision Agreement to include the Pay Assurance provisions as outlined in Schedule "A" and any other changes as deemed necessary by the City Solicitor and the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer; 3. That the City Clerk advise the Ontario Sewer and Watermain Construction Association and the Ontario Urban Development Institute (UDI) that the City has agreed to include Pay Assurance provisions in the City's Subdivision Agreements; and, 4. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect hereto. Executive Summary: At the December 5, 2005 City Council meeting, Mr. Steve Mahoney made a presentation regarding the benefits of the pay assurance program. This program is designed to protect "Prime Contractors" who undertake work for "Developers" where the developers either do not payor are substantially late in making their payments. Under the pay assurance plan, the prime contractors would be able to be paid by the City drawing on the Letter of Credit provided by the developer. Council referred the matter to the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer to review and report back on this matter. The Director met with appropriate City staff and Mr. Mahoney and also reviewed other reports and agreements from other municipalities. Financial Implications: Not Applicable Report CS 34-06 Date: June 26, 2006 ;:;28 Subject: Adoption of Pay Assurance Page 2 Background: Mr. Steve Mahoney made a presentation to Council on December 5, 2005 regarding the benefits of the "Pay Assurance" program and Council passed Resolution 216/05 which states in part: ''2. That the City of Pickering endorse the concept of Pay Assurance, in principle; and 3. That the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer report back to Council on Pay Assurance once staff has met with representatives of the program." The Pay Assurance program proposes to amend the City's current subdivision agreement by attaching clauses that would require the City to pay the sewer and watermain contractor if the developer defaults on paying the contractor. The amended subdivision agreement would permit the City to draw on the Letter of Credit as provided by the developer under certain rules and conditions. Currently the sewer and watermain contractors have limited recourse should a developer not pay for complete and acceptable work. Under this scenario, when a developer fails to pay, the City still derives the benefit of a completed municipal service, the developer is still able to sell new products or homes; yet the sewer and watermain contractor who built the essential services which assists in the construction of the new subdivision receives nothing. Ontario Sewer and Watermain Construction Association (OSWCA) members are the prime service contractors who work on either public right of way (roads) or what will soon become public right of way property. If the developer does not pay the contractor for his work, the contractor can sue the developer. Unfortunately, the Construction Lien Act, does not provide the same level of protection to these contractors as compared to other contractors because liens cannot be attached to public roads. In order to avoid the "non-payment or late payment" scenario, legal conditions would be added to the City's standard Subdivision Agreement which would provide for payment to the prime contractor if the developer fails to pay. Under the City's revised subdivision agreement, prime contractors would seek payment for their services by having the City draw on the Letter of Credit provided by the developer. Any payment to a contractor would be subject to a $3,000 administrative fee per payment. In addition, City staff will review the administration fee on an annual basis to ensure that the City's costs are recovered especially with potentially large development projects on the horizon. The $3,000 administrative fee will be listed in the City's annual user fee guide starting in 2007. How will Pay Assurance Work? - (The Basics) 1. Prime Contractor delivers to the City, proof that it has invoiced the developer and that the invoice is still outstanding after 91 days. 2. The developers' consulting engineer certifies that the work is being invoiced by the contractor has been completed satisfactorily. 3. The prime contractor signs and releases the City from all potential claims. () 'J i) (._"...... V Report CS 34-06 Date: June 26, 2006 Subject: Adoption of Pay Assurance Page 3 4. The developer signs and releases the City from all potential claims 5. The City draws on the "Letter of Credit" and puts the funds into escrow. 6. The City pays the monies out of escrow in accordance with the final award under the Arbitration Act. In addition, no payment will be considered to the prime contractor, unless the claim being considered is at least $25,000. Revision to the City's Standard Subdivision Aqreement Schedule A includes the proposed new wording to be added to the City's standard subdivision agreement. The proposed wording has been reviewed by the Director, Planning & Development and the City Solicitor. They concur with the direction being taken by the City. Attachments: 1. Schedule A - Pay Assurance Provisions Prepared By: Approved I Endorsed By: ~ç ¡:~ ,<=->/ , Stan Karwowski Manager, Finance & Taxation ~..r· . ...... <---"1~;;;;~::¡:;; ~:=:;:>~ Gillis A. Paterson Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer GAP:sk Attachment Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering Cit Co cil ", o{ ATTACHMENT#--L- TOREPORT~£/"'O' Cc Schedule A Revision to the City's Subdivision Agreement .) ') (.) (.. J I PAY ASSURANCE (1) In this section, (a) "Prime Contract" means a direct contract with the Owner for the construction of any of the Works; and (b) "Prime Contractor" means the party contracting with the Owner under a Prime Contract. (2) Where a Prime Contractor notifies the City in writing that monies are payable in relation to any of the works identified in a Prime Contract, the City is hereby authorized to draw upon the securities posted by the Owner under this Agreement and place such funds in escrow provided, (a) the Owner has notified the City in writing of the name of the Prime Contractor prior to the commencement of construction; (b) the Prime Contractor operates at arm's length from the Owner and is not otherwise under the control of the Owner; (c) the Owner has posted security in accordance with this Agreement; (d) the Prime Contractor has delivered to the City a true copy of its invoice addressed to the Owner for payment under the Prime Contract; (e) payment of the invoice has been outstanding for a period of at least ninety-one (91) calendar days or such longer period of time as may be set out for payment in the Prime Contract; (f) the Owner's Consulting Engineer has certified, (i) that the work invoiced to the Owner by the Prime Contractor for which payment is sought has been completed satisfactorily in accordance with the Owner's obligations under this Agreement; (ii) the date upon which the Prime Contractor's invoice became due and payable under the Prime Contract; and (iii) that the Prime Contractor has performed all of its obligations under the Prime Contract; ;) 31 (... t (g) the Prime Contractor has delivered to the City proof that it has made a written demand for payment to the Owner to which the Owner has not responded for a period of at least thirty (30) days and beyond the ninety-one day (91) day period set out in (e) above; and (h) the Prime Contractor has executed a Release and Indemnity in a form satisfactory to the City, releasing the City from any and all claims the Prime Contractor may have against the City and indemnifying the City against any and all claims for loss arising from any source whatsoever resulting from the City's payment into escrow and agreement to be bound by the dispute resolution process under the Arbitration Act, S.O. 1991, c. 17, as amended. (3) The City shall not process a payment in favour of the Prime Contractor unless the amount claimed is at least twenty-five thousand dollars ($25, 000.00). (4) The City shall be entitled to reimbursement of its administrative costs which shall be deducted from each payment processed in favour of the Prime Contractor in the amount of $3,000.00. (5) The Owner shall not make any claims against the City and hereby releases and agrees to indemnify the City of and from any claims arising from the release of any funds drawn from the security posted by the Owner or as a result of any action taken under this section. (6) Under no circumstances shall the City be obliged to drawn down and pay the full amount of security it holds under this Agreement. For greater certainty, the City shall not be left with less than one hundred per cent (100%) of the value of uncompleted Works plus twenty per cent (20%) of the value of all completed Works. (7) If the City makes payments to the Prime Contractor in accordance with this Agreement, the works for which the Prime Contractor receives payment from the City out of the Owner's security shall be credited toward the Owner's obligations under this Agreement less ten per cent (10%) on account of maintenance and less applicable administrative charges (as outlined in subsection (4). (8) The procedure set out in this section shall have no application in cases where the installation of the Works is done prior to execution of this Agreement. (9) The Owner shall make explicit reference to these pay assurance provisions in any Prime Contract. (10) The City shall have no obligation to pay the Prime Contractor except in accordance with this section. (11) If for any reason the City has released securities or is unable to cash or access the Letter of Credit, there shall be no claim against the City available to a Prime Contractor. (12) The disputed payment under the Prime Contract shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the Arbitration Act, 8.0. 1991, c.17, as amended. (13) The City shall pay monies out of escrow in accordance with the final award under the Arbitration Act, S.O. 1991, c.17, as amended. t) r3 r') (.' \. ~'., ,'.\ f) ~., (' .J ·tiú/ O~ REPORT TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Report Number: CS 36-06 Date: June 26,2006 From: Gillis A. Paterson Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer Subject: 2006/2007 Property and Liability Insurance Program Recommendation: 1 . It is recommended that Report CS 36-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be received; 2. That the City of Pickering renew effective June 26, 2006, its property, liability and other coverages through the Frank Cowan Company for the period July 1,2006 to July 1, 2007 inclusive on terms and conditions acceptable to the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer; 3. That the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, as part of the Risk Management Program, be authorized to continue the Reimbursable Deductible Program through the Insurance Adjuster and the Frank Cowan Company and further, that the Director be authorized to settle any claims including any adjusting and legal fees within the total deductible limit where it is in the City's interest to do so; 4. That the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be authorized to purchase additional insurance, make changes to deductibles and existing coverages, and alter terms and conditions as becomes desirable or necessary in order to limit potential liability exposure and to protect the assets of the City and it's elected officials and staff; and, 5. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be given authority to give effect thereto. Executive Summary: The City's insurance program continues to operate successfully and the above recommendations provide for a renewal of the policies basically on the same or improved terms and conditions in the past years which also provides coverage for the Library, its Board and its employees. Report CS 36-06 Date: June 26, 2006 í) 311 t.,. -f Subject: 2006/2007 Property & Liability Insurance Page 2 Financial Implications: The premium renewal cost has been provided for in the various cost centers through the approval of the 2006 budget by Council and the renewal premium cost is within the 2006 budgeted amount. The City's premium renewal represents a $40,000 increase over last year while maintaining the City's deductible at a reasonable level. Staff investigated having higher deductible limits, but the risk outweighed the potential savings and or benefits. Background: Each year on July 1, the City's general liability and property insurance policies come up for renewal. As approved by Council at the time of the 1998 renewal, the Treasurer undertook an extensive review of all aspects of the City's insurance program. The City of Pickering embarked in a Risk Management Program, the initial phase of which involved negotiating renewing premiums with the City's broker. The result of the negotiations was a decrease of approximately $75,000 or 20 percent, in the premiums from that of the prior year. This premium was also approximately $98,000 less than the 1998 budget provision which, after claims under the increased deductible were paid, resulted in a transfer of approximately $50,000 to the Self Insurance Reserve. From 1999 to 2003, staff have reviewed the deductibles, coverages, policies and procedures to ensure that the City is financially protected. In 1999 approximately $92,000 was transferred to the Insurance Reserve as a result of the continued savings. In 2000 and 2001, the amount of $100,000 in each year was included as a revenue item in the annual budget. For the 2002 budget, $50,000 was included as revenue with the balance being used to offset premium increases. The 2003 Budget anticipated a premium increase and therefore, no savings were transferred to the Self Insurance Reserve and a budget increase of approximately $100,000 was avoided. As a result the balance of the Reserve at December 31, 2006 was approximately $915,000. The 2006 budget anticipated a premium increase based on current industry trends and also due to the increase in assets covered through the policy. Our renewal premium is below the budgeted amount which continues in part to reflect our claims experience based on our risk portfolio or municipal services provided. Another key aspect of the City's program is the fact that our deductibles are at a reasonable level within the City's level of affordability. Recommendation 4 provides the Treasurer with the authority to continue to review and adjust insurance coverages where appropriate during the year to reflect current market and business environment conditions. Weather Related Events & Current External Insurance Environment Natural (i.e. weather-related) catastrophes, although unpredictable have now become an annual event. Weather patterns have brought severe weather conditions in various parts of the world - torrential rainstorms, flooding and hurricanes. Canadians can not f ,,, Report CS 36-06 Date: June 26, 2006 Subject: 2006/2007 Property & Liability Insurance Page 3 expect to be exempt from severe weather events. Last year there was flooding in Calgary and Edmonton and on August 19, 2005 a rainstorm cut a relatively narrow swath through southwestern Ontario and the Toronto area resulting in estimated losses of $500 million. Unfortunately, natural or weather-related catastrophes are not limited to municipal boundaries. Instead, when these events occur, as mentioned above, they can affect several or many municipalities. Basic risk management states that you should diversify your risk. Many insurance companies have customers throughout the Province or Canada to diversify the risk associated with a local catastrophic event. With the City of Pickering being a direct customer of the Frank Cowan Company (who has customers throughout the Province and beyond) the geographical risk diversification is achieved and maintained. Natural weather related catastrophes can generate claims in the billions of dollars. Hurricane Katrina has been the most destructive of all hurricanes which damaged the New Orleans levee system and resulted in massive flooding and is estimated to have caused $70 billion worth of insured damage. These claims/payments will probably be covered by the reinsurance industry which in-turn recovers these losses through higher premiums. The chart below illustrates the relationship among the three principles in the insurance relationship. Reinsurance Relationship (Insured) Frank Cowan (Insurer) Reinsurer City of Pickering The Frank Cowan Company through a reinsurance contract transfers a portion of its risks to the reinsurer in order to achieve a balanced "risk" portfolio. Historically, insurance companies have relieved on investment income to generate funds to offset premium increases. Currently, insurance companies continue to experience, generally low returns from their investments which translates into potentially higher premiums. Service to Our Residents Regrettably, insurance claims or incidents are made on a regular basis. A key strategic advantage of the City's insurance and risk management program is that every claim is processed with a customer service attitude. After a claim or incident is received, City staff quickly contact (within 24 hours) the claimant to advise them that the City has received the claim and to ensure them that the claim is being investigated by the City's Report CS 36-06 Date: June 26, 2006 Subject: 2006/2007 Property & Liability Insurance Page 4 i) 3 ('""I I" \ J insurance adjuster. The City's insurance adjuster has over 20 years of local municipal insurance experience which the City uses as an asset to investigate and settle claims. The City's insurance adjuster service standard is to make contact with the claimant within two business days. Sometimes, the claimants may not be completely satisfied with the outcome and City staff may review the claim and or to intervene to work towards a solution. The strategic advantage of the "local service delivery model" is that claims are handled quickly professionally and with a customer service perspective. In addition, the current "local" service delivery model allows City staff "hands on" participation in the claims process to better serve claimants which in many cases are City residents. Conclusion The City's Insurance and Risk Management Programs appear to be working satisfactory. The City has benefited from its long standing relationship with the Frank Cowan Company especially during the current insurance market. Therefore, renewal through the Frank Cowan Company with our present carriers is recommended. Attachments: 1. Program Summary of Insurance Coverage Prepared By: Approved I Endorsed By: -~. ~ -...2 ~ . ---.;'.". .....,~>~-----. . c: ~. \".c" ,f''''''''''''"' . . ~,~~ -' ~ l. _".,.'., ," Gillis A. Paterson Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer ~'/:/ --~=.. ,.. ~ ...,..--~:, <:.....- -...'- Stan Karwowski Manager, Finance & Taxation GAP:vw Attachment Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council d .-) 3 ",'Î ( , í /:..TTACHMENT#L TO REPORT # c:s 36--0(, -- $ C2~~~ompany REceIVED CITY OF pn:!-q:::RING .JUN 0 'L 2006 CORPORATE SERVICES 2006 Municipal Insurance Program · - _.it Lilr! "f ;'-~ IJ:~""""¡¡; ,~.. PÍêrŒft CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING Prepared by: Mr. Randy Edwards, ClP, CAIB, CCIB, RIB (Ontario) Regional Manager Frank Cowan Company Limited 4 Cowan Street East Princeton, ON NOJ 1 VO This is a summary. Nothing herein alters the terms, conditions and exclusions contained in the printed insurance conrract(s). REF: 60275/rc May 30. 2006 randy .edwards @frankcowan.com 1.800.265.4000 T/519.458.4331 F/519.458.4366 About the Frank Cowan Company 1')38" (." Leader in Public Entity Insurance Since 1927, The Frank Cowan Company has grown to become one of Canada's leading providers of Insurance and Risk Management solutions for public entitJles. Cowan has been a pioneer in the development and implementation of innovative insurance programs for the Municipal, Health Care, and Education sectors. Cowan Insurance Group The Frank Cowan Company Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Cowan Insurance Group, whose other wholly owned subsidiaries include Cowan Insurance Brokers Limited and Cowan Wright Beauchamp Limited, making the Cowan Insurance Group one of the largest privately held companies of its type in Canada. Cowan Insurance Brokers Limited provides personal insurance products (home and automobile), and commercial insurance programs to thousands of individuals and corporations across Canada. Cowan Wright Beauchamp Limited provides pension, benefits, actuarial and human resource consulting to corporations and public entities. The Cowan Insurance Group is a wholly owned subsidiary of Princeton Holdings Limited, which also owns controlling interest in The Guarantee Company of North America, an insurance leader in surety bonding, corporate risk products and high value homeowner coverages. Outstanding Service We are more than just an insurance provider. We are a trusted partner in providing insurance and risk management. We work with our clients to develop individualized programs including complete risk management, claims management and an array of other services. Our mandate is clear.. .help our clients reduce risk. Clients also benefit rrom our affiliations with lawyers, adjusters and others that specialize in the public sector. The combination of our service network and internal expertise allow us to continually develop innovative, cost-effective solutions and services tailored to the risks of individual clients. Financial Stability Cowan, as a Managing General Agent of public entity portfolios, represents a group of select insurers of exceptional reputation and financial stability, which creates a very stable market for your insurance requirements, and gives our customers the comfort of knowing that they will always be protected by long-tenn, high-quality continuous servIce. Frank Cowan Company Limited -2- , " ., 1 . Cowan Service Solutions More Than Just Insurance Cowan offers a full range of services to assist in the management and reduction of risk, which is equally vital to our clients. Risk Management, Claims Management and our other value-added services were initiated by Cowan and have evolved throughout our history of specialized services. Most often we can provide the services listed below at no additional cost to the client. Liability Hazard Assessment Seminars & Staff Training Systems & Processes Contractual Review Publications, Bulletins & Information Packages Claims Management /t;¡ø Our Municipal clients are involved in a wide range of activities and operations designed to service the needs of their constituents. The diverse nature of these activities leads to various potential public liability situations; we work with our clients to provide specific hazard identification and analysis of these exposures. /t;¡ø We deliver a wide range of presentations to our Municipal clients on an ongoing basis that provide continuous education for our clients. /t;¡ø We help our clients develop systems and processes for consistency within their operations and specifically focus on documentation, reporting and investigation of claims and accidents. /t;¡ø Our experience contributes insight on the suitability and effectiveness of liability transfers and appropriate insurance and indenmity clauses within your various contracts. /t;¡ø Because constant two way communication is important, our website is available on a 24 hour basis for access to information on our Services, Publications and programs. Anyone in your organization can visit us at www.frankcowan.com to keep infonned of common issues and solutions. /t;¡ø We handle your claim fairly and efficiently. Claims that are made against you are handled with the consistent strategy of defending or discouraging those claims that are without merit, or reaching a reasonable settlement on claims that do merit payment. Throughout this process, your interests are paramount and your input is sought. Detailed claims progress reports are produced and can be organized by type of loss or department to suit your needs. Frank Cowan Company Limited - 3 - MARKETPLACE CONDITIONS ,., 4 0 ..~ ," , I·", The Canadian Property & Casualty Insurance marketplace continues to be susceptible to losses that have outpaced premiums coupled with reduced investment income. Increased stonn and natural catastrophe activity in 2005 will put upward pressure on rates. Insurance markets continue to focus on specific types of business risks. This has reduced the number of specialty insurers, who are willing to underwrite risks such as public entity. As a result, all insurance purchasers are affected. The Public sector has experienced significant losses in the past few years. Some of these losses have been driven by landmark cases, but overall, frequency and severity of claims has increased dramatically. As well, the overall cost of claims, which takes into account escalating court awards, claims administration expenses and the ever increasing replacement costs of assets, has continued to rise during this period at a rate in excess of the premium growth. In addition, insurers and re-insurers have become extremely cautious about public entity liabilities because of the continuing downloading of services by the provincial government, namely roads and ambulance services. Insurers are now experiencing the impact of the claims from these downloaded services and the impact they are having on the public entity portfolio. As a result of market conditions, a number of insurers have withdrawn from the public entity marketplace or had coverage limitations imposed upon them by their markets. This does not allow them to effectively address the needs of public entity clients. Frank Cowan Company Limited, a long-tenn specialist in public entity insurance, continues to receive the support and capacity of our markets. We continue to provide long tenn stability for the insurance and risk management needs of our public entity clientele. Our policies and services continue to evolve to reflect the continuing exposures brought about by downloading and new opportunities public entities now enjoy as a result of the new Municipal Act. Cowan has for many years been able to provide a consistent and continuously stable market for public entities. We are confident that our product and pricing will continue to reflect this position. The tenns and conditions for the 2006 Renewal will be subject to the following: Continued support of our markets. No major changes in the loss experience of your portfolio. No major changes in the re-insurance market that would adversely affect the underlying msurance. Frank Cowan Company Limited - 4 - :' 4: PROGRAM SUMMARY SUMMARY OF COVERAGES LIMITS/AMOUNTS PART A - CASUALTY Municipal Liability Limit of Protection per occurrence (No Annual Aggregate Limit) Third Party Claims Deductible including expenses Sewer Backup Deductible including expenses Wrongful Dismissal (defence costs) Limit per claim Annual Aggregate Limit Deductible Municipal Marina Liability Malpractice Liability V oluntary Compensation Errors and Omissions Limit of Protection per claim (No Annual Aggregate Limit) Deductible including expenses Non-Owned Automobile Limit of Protection per occurrence (No Annual Aggregate Limit) Legal Liability for Non-Owned Vehicles (S.E.F. No. 94) Third Party Deductible All Perils Physical Damage Limit Deductible Environmental Liability Liability of Protection per claim Annual Aggregate Limit Self-Insured Retention Frank Cowan Company Limited - 5 - $ 25,000,000. $ 50,000, $ 50,000. $ 250,000. $ 250,000. $ 5,000. Included Included Included $ 25,000,000. $ 50,000. $ 25,000,000. $ $ $ 10,000. 500,000. 500. $ $ $ 1,000,000. 2,000,000. 50,000. PROGRAM SUMMARY SUMMARY OF COVERAGES f' 4 ¿~ .? LIMITS! AMOUNTS Comprehensive Crime Commercial Blanket Bond Counterfeit Paper and Depositors' Forgery Audit Expense (Sub-Limit $ 100,000.) Money and Securities - Blanket any Location Excess on Securities Councillors' Accident- City MayorlRegional Councillor, Three Regional Councillors (Durham)!City Councillor, Three City Councillors and Nine Library Board Members Accidental Death & Dismemberment (24 Hour a Day Coverage) (No Annual Aggregate Limit and No Deductible) Wee1dy Income - Total Disability Wee1dy Income - Partial Disability Municipal Conflict of Interest Percentage of Legal Fees and Expenses Maximum Limit of Reimbursement per claim (No Annual Aggregate Limit) Legal Expense Percentage of Legal Fees and Expenses Maximum Limit of Reimbursement per claim Annual Aggregate Limit Frank Cowan Company Limited - 6 - $ 2,000,000. Included Included Included 100,000. 100,000. $ $ $ 100,000. $ $ 500. 250. $ 100% 100,000. $ $ 100% 100,000. 250,000. \.' '1 ~¡ .!.. . t.... ' PROGRAMSU:MMARY SUMMARY OF COVERAGES PART B - PROPERTY Property Insurance (including Data Processing Insurance) Total Sum Insured * Valuable Papers Accounts Receivable (other than Data Processing) Extra Expense (other than Data Processing) Business Interruption Rent or Rental Value Fonn Gross Revenue Fonn Checkroom Liability Data Processing System and Equipment Media Extra Expense Fine Arts Fonn Exhibition Fonn Deductible Exceptions: Checkroom Liability, Fire Training Trailer, Fine Arts Fonn and Exhibition Fonn - Peril of Flood - Peril of Earthquake 3% or Minimum LIMITS/AMOUNTS $ 131,497,200. $ 500,000. $ 500,000. $ 1,000,000. $ 500,000. $ 2,584,500. $ 5,000. $ 1,440,800. 47,000. 50,000. $ $ $ 2,000. As Per Lists Provided $ 10,000. $ $ $ 2,500. 25,000. 100,000. *Note: Please refer to the insurance contract for an itemized list of assets containing specific limits of insurance or that are excluded from the policy. Frank Cowan Company Limited - 7 - SUMMARY OF COVERAGES PROGRAM SUMMARY Boiler and Machinery Limit per Accident - Comprehensive Extra Expense Water Damage Ammonia Contamination Expediting Expenses Hazardous Substance (including PCB Contamination) Business Interruption - Loss of Profits (Gross Revenue) - All Buildings & Facilities, Greenwood Museum, Pickering - Don Beer Arena, 940 Dillingham Road, Pickering - Dunbarton Indoor Pool, 655 Sheppard Ave. E., Pickering _ Pickering Recreation Complex, 1867 Valley Fann Road, Pickering Spoilage - Goods under Refrigeration Professional Fees Data and Media By-Law Cover Deductible Frank Cowan Company Limited - 8 - ')4 ~ (.., "f LIMITS/AMOUNTS $ 50,000,000. $ 500,000. $ 500,000. $ 500,000. Included $ 500,000. $ 94,500. $ 600,000. $ 1 00,000. $ 1,790,000. $ 50,000. $ 500,000. $ 10,000. Included $ 10,000. , 1,,,- ,- . -#, í' ~_ I PROGRAM SUMMARY SUMMARY OF COVERAGES LIMITS/AMOUNTS PART C -AUTOMOBILE Automobile Fleet Liability Limit Deductibles Section 3 (Third Party) Section 6 (Direct Compensation) No Physical Damage applies to 1951 Antique Pumper (parades) All Perils applies to All Other Vehicles $ 25,000,000. $ 10,000. $ 10,000. $ 10,000. Garage Automobile Third Party Liability Limit $ 3,000,000. Customer Vehic1es Collision Limit $ 200,000. Deductible $ 500. Specified Perils Limit $ 300,000. Deductible $ 500. Frank Cowan Company Limited - 9 - I:' 4 {"\ (. ¡ ) COMPREHENSIVE INSURANCE PROGRAM COVERAGE FEATURES 2006 - 2007 Frank Cowan Company Limited - 10- "47 ~ PART A CASUALTY Frank Cowan Company Limited - 11 - MUNICIPAL LIABILITY INSURANCE t~48 Features The Cowan Municipal Program incorporates a comprehensive and broadly worded liability policy which was designed specifically to meet the needs of municipalities and their corresponding risks which are quite different and unique from other commercial risks that are insured under a Commercial General Liability (CGL) policy. When comparing forms of coverage, it is important to note that unless the coverage is specifically excluded, it is generally covered, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy. · Liability coverage provided for Bodily Injury, Property Damage, and Personal Injury. · Separate Limit of Liability applies. · No Annual Aggregate limit is applicable · Coverage is provided on an Occurrence basis. · Broad fonn DefInition of Insured applies, including: Councillors, Employees, Statutory OffIcers, FirefIghters, Volunteers, Boards, Commissions, and Committees. · Cross Liability is included. · Coverage applies Worldwide. Thefollowing coverages are included to the full policy limit, unless specified otherwise: · Employers' Liability Contractual Liability Liquor Liability Tenants' Legal Liability Sewer back-up Liability Professional Liability on an Occurrence basis (e.g. Building Inspection Services, Medical Malpractice). Malpractice Liability Watercraft Liability Products Liability Wrongful Dismissal coverage is included, subject to the limits specifIed in the Summary of Coverage pages. No exclusion for sexual, physical or mental abuse applies to the entity. · · · · · · · · · · Please refer to the insurance contract for all limits, terms, conditions and exclusions that apply. Frank Cowan Company Limited - 12 - ')49" c·, ERRORS AND OMISSIONS LIABILITY INSURANCE Features This is a claims-made policy that protects the municipality from liability imposed upon it by a court of civil law for compensatory damages because of a wrongfitl act causingfinancialloss to a third party. Claims for Wrongful Acts causing financial loss to a third party can range from, but are not limited to, negligence in building inspection, zoning, planning, passing by-laws, failing to enforce by-laws, to misrepresentation, abuse of power and acting in bad faith. · Separate Limit of Liability applies. · No Annual Aggregate limit is applicable. · Broad form DefInition of Insured applies, including: Councillors, Employees, Statutory OffIcers, FirefIghters, Volunteers, Boards, Commissions, and Committees. · Administration of Employee BenefIt Programs 1S included to the full policy limit (no aggregate limit applies). · Coverage applies Worldwide. Please refer to the insurance contract for all limits, terms, conditions and exclusions that apply. Frank Cowan Company Limited - 13 - . /' "" {) ~-' ,,) t NON-OWNED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE F ea tures This policy provides liability protection against claims arising out of accidents involving vehicles not owned by the municipality, but operated on its behalf · The main coverage is as per S.P.F. No. 6-Non-Owned Automobile Policy. · A separate limit of liability applies. · Coverage is extended to provide excess automobile liability insurance, to the policy limit, for Councillors, Board Members, Officers, Employees, and even Volunteers for claims arising while driving their own vehicles on municipal business. · Physical damage coverage, as specified in the Swnmary of Coverage pages, is provided for the municipality's contractual and legal liability for damage to vehicles not owned by the corporation or any other insured. (Note: Unlike standard industry wordings, we do not restrict this coverage to "hired" automobiles only.) Please refer to the insurance contract for all limits, terms, conditions and exclusions that apply. Frank Cowan Company Limited - 14 - .;: 51 {J ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY INSURANCE Features This is a claims-made policy that protects the municipality from environmental liability for claims because of bodily irifury, property damage and the prevention, control, repair, clean-up or restoration of environmental impairment. Cowan's comprehensive wording, among other things, does not limit a municipality to claims arising from a sudden and accidental event. · Separate limits of liability apply specifically to this coverage. · Broad fonn Definition of Insured applies, including: Councillors, Employees, Statutory Officers, Firefighters, Volunteers, Boards, Commissions, and Committees. · Broad definition of Environmental Impainnent applies. · Coverage is included for sudden and accidental events and for liability resulting from events that occur gradually and over a period of time (i.e. not limited to sudden and accidental claims). · Coverage is included for liability arising out of the escape of contaminants from properties previously owned, leased or operated by the municipality. · Coverage is included for impainnent caused by owned watercraft. · Coverage applies Worldwide. · No exclusion for landfill sites, open or closed. · No exclusion for fuel tanks, above or underground. Please refer to the insurance contract for all limits, terms, conditions and exclusions that apply. Frank Cowan Company Limited - 15 - .-~ 5 () " - t" t.. CRIME INSURANCE Features This policy provides protection to the municipality for the loss of money, securities and other property through the fraudulent or dishonest acts of employees and others. · Coverage is provided on a Commercial Blanket Bond package, and may include: Employee Dishonesty, Loss of Money and Securities, Money Order and Counterfeit Paper Currency, and Depositors Forgery. · Audit expense coverage is in addition to the overall bond limit, to the maximum amount provided in the Summary of Coverage pages. · The definition of "employee" is extended to include all persons holding positions in the municipality's service who are not compensated, and includes Members of Council, Members of all Boards, Commissions and Committees appointed by and under Council's jurisdiction. · The definition of "messenger" is also extended to include persons not compensated. · No deductible applies. Please refer to the insurance contract for all limits, terms, conditions and exclusions that apply. Frank Cowan Company Limited - 16 - '·-~·'"""i ')~j t" COUNCILLORS' ACCIDENT INSURANCE F ea tures This policy provides accident insurance coverage for the benefit of the municipality's elected officials. All benefits are payable in addition to any other benefits that the injured person may be in receipt of · Coverage applies while the individual is acting within the scope of their duties, including all travel required. · No aggregate limit applies. · No age restriction applies. · Coverage is not limited to "authorized" travel only. · Weekly indemnities are paid in full regardless of the individual's employment status (e.g. retired, self-employed, etc.). · Weekly indemnity for Total Loss of Time is payable for life. · A schedule of Dismembennent Benefits is provided and payable as set out in the policy. · Funeral expenses are included up to $10,000. · Blanket Accident expenses are included up to $10,000. and include dental, chiropractic, registered nurse, podiatrist, ambulance, drugs, crutches, etc. Please refer to the insurance contract for all limits, terms, conditions and exclusions that apply. Frank Cowan Company Limited - 17 - 254 CONFLICT OF INTEREST INSURANCE Features This policy provides for the reimbursement of legal fees and expenses incurred by the elected or appointed members of Council who are charged under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, provided that a courtfinds (1) there has been no contravention, or (2) contravention has occurred by reason of inadvertence, remoteness, or insignificance, or (3) contravention has occurred by reason of a bona fide error injudgement. · Coverage is provided in respect of each individual Insured's claim to the maximum lirrút specified in the SumrnaI)' of Coverage pages. · Separate limit of insurance applies to this coverage. · No annual aggregate limit applies. · Coverage is extended to include any member of a Board, Commission, or Committee of the Insured as defined in the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act. · Coverage is also included for any subsequent proceedings under this Act. · The Insured selects and instructs legal counsel with no intervention by the insurer. Please refer to the insurance contract for all limits, terms, conditions and exclusions that apply. Frank Cowan Company Limited - 18 - · 5~'1 LEGAL EXPENSE INSURANCE Features This policy provides for the reimbursement of legal fees including disbursements incurred by the insured in defence of charges laid for an alleged offence under any Statute of the Province of Ontario (except for the Highway Traffic Act and the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act). Some of the more common Statutes where exposure exists include: Environmental Protection Act, Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, Occupational Health and Safety Act, Ontario Water Resources Act, and Pesticides Act. · Broad fonn Definition of Insured applies, including: Councillors, Employees, Statutory Officers, Firefighters, Volunteers, Boards, Commissions, and Committees. · Separate limits of insurance apply to this coverage. · Coverage applies to both "guilty" and "not guilty" outcomes if applicable. · The Insured selects and instructs legal counsel with no intervention by the insurer. Please refer to the insurance contract for all limits, terms, conditions and exclusions that apply. Frank Cowan Company Limited - 19 - ~:56 PART B PROPERTY Frank Cowan Company Limited - 20- ,........ "7 ..~ (~ v PROPERTY INSURANCE Features This policy provides "All Risk" coverage to protect the municipality's assets from direct physical loss or damage. Coverage is provided on a blanket basis, which means that the municipality will not be jeopardized should the value of an asset be undervalued in the schedule and suffer a total loss. Rather, the municipality will enjoy the protection of the blanket limit of all assets combined. Another key feature of the Cowan wording is that the replacement cost coverage provides replacement of historical or unique buildings with materials as similar as possible to preserve their heritage. · Broad defInition of property insured is included. No co-insurance clauses apply. Insured is not required to provide a signed statement of values and policy does not contain a stated amount clause. · · · Replacement Cost coverage is provided (unless specifIcally stated otherwise). Worldwide coverage is included. Replacement on same site is not required. No restriction on property in transit and coverage is provided to policy limit. Newly acquired property is automatically included with no limit other than the policy limit. Permission is granted for the following: to make additions, alterations and repairs (no limit other than the policy limit), for any property to remain vacant or unoccupied, to use any property for any purpose, and to keep and use materials as usual and necessary. Sewer back-up coverage is included. By-law coverage is included to the policy limit. Debris removal (including Environmental/Pollution Clean-up) is included to the policy limit. · · · · · · · · Frank Cowan Company Limited - 21 - ')-5H... t... Property Insurance Features continued · The following coverages, if applicable, are included to the limit specified in the Summary of Coverage pages: Valuable Papers, Accounts Receivable, Extra Expense (including Interruption by Civil Authority), and Media (unless included under Data Processing Rider) · The following coverages are also available, if applicable (please refer to the Summary of Coverage pages): Data Processing System and Equipment, along with Media and Extra Expense, Fine Arts, Exhibition Fonn, and Business Interruption. · If a single loss involves both the Automobile and Property Insurance policies, the Property policy deductible is waived only on any insured property attached to the automobile. · One deductible applies should there be a loss involving both the Property and the Boiler and Maclúnery Insurance policies. Please refer to the insurance contract for all limits, terms, conditions and exclusions that apply. Frank Cowan Company Limited - 22- ~" , ~. BOILER AND MACHINERY INSURANCE Features This policy insures sudden and accidental mechanical breakdown to boilers, pressure vessels, and other equipment including resulting danwge, all of which is generally excluded under a Property Insurance policy. Examples of common types of breakdowns insured would include: cracking, bulging, burning, explosion, mechanical breakdown and electrical burnout. This insurance also provides inspections and certification services as required by law. · Comprehensive Blanket coverage provided. · Broad defInition of Object, includes communication equipment and production machinery. · Settlement is based on repair or replacement cost (no depreciation factor). · Broad defInition of Accident applies. · New locations and newly installed objects are automatically included. · Computer Control Equipment is included when used solely to control or operate an insured object. · The following coverages, if applicable, are included to the limit shown on the Summary of Coverage pages: Extra Expense, Water Damage, Ammonia Contamination, Expediting Expenses, Hazardous Substance (including PCB Contamination), Loss of Arena Revenues, Spoilage, Professional Fees, Data and Media, and By-Law Cover. · One deductible applies should there be a loss involving both the Boiler and Machinery and Property Insurance policies. Please refer to the insurance contract for all limits, terms, conditions and exclusions that apply. Frank Cowan Company Limited - 23- PART C AUTOMOBILE Frank Cowan Company Limited - 24- '::(,\0 L ~::61 AUTOMOBILE FLEET INSURANCE Features This policy provides protection for all claims arising out of the use or operation of licensed automobiles o'l1'fled or leased by the municipality. Coverage is provided as per the Statutory Automobile Owner's Policy. A special Cowan endorsement is added to enhance the basic policy coverage. · Coverage is provided for Liability, Accident Benefits, Uninsured Automobile, and Direct Compensation - Property Damage. Loss or Damage coverages are available as requested by the MlU1Ìcipality to protect their licensed vehicles from physical damage caused by an insured peril. Coverage is automatically extended to include: newly acquired vehicles, inappropriately licensed drivers, pem1Íssion to carry explosives, pem1Íssion to rent or lease, damage caused by freezing of Fire-Fighting Apparatus, and pem1Íssion to carry passengers for compensation. Our Replacement Cost coverage is lU1Ìque. It provides repairs or replacement of vehicles with no deduction for depreciation. On a partial loss, repair estimates are calculated by using all new parts to repair damage. On a total loss, the mlU1Ìcipality has the option of purchasing a new vehicle, or accepting a cash settlement for the amount it would cost to purchase a new vehicle. Guaranteed Amount coverage can be provided on specified vehicles. Repairs or replacement will be undertaken without deduction for depreciation up to the Guaranteed Amount shown on the automobile schedule attached to the policy. Valued coverage can be provided on specified vehicles, usually those that are obsolete, would not be replaced, or would be replaced with a used vehicle. Actual cash value (ACV) coverage can be provided on specified vehicles. If a single loss involves both the Automobile and Property Insurance policies, the Property policy deductible is waived only on any insured property attached to the automobile. · · · · · · · Please refer to the insurance contract for all limits, terms, conditions and exclusions that apply. Frank Cowan Company Limited - 25- ')6 '1 t. \. ;"'-' GARAGE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE Features This policy provides protection for all claims arising out of a municipality's garage operations and its legal liability for customer vehicles. Coverage is provided as per the Statutory Garage Automobile Policy. Garage operations include not only repair garages, but also storage garages and parking lot operations. · Coverage is provided for Third Party Liability for bodily injury or property damage as per the limit specified in the Summary of Coverage pages. · Coverage is also provided for Accident Benefits, Uninsured Automobile, and Direct Compensation Property Damage. · Loss or Damage coverage is available as requested by the municipality to protect its legal liability for a customer's automobile from physical damage caused by an insured peril, while in the care, custody or control of the municipality. · Physical damage coverage for customer vehicles can include Collision, and Comprehensive or Specified Perils coverage. Please refer to the limits and deductibles for the selected coverage as specified in the Summary of Coverage pages. Please refer to the insurance contract for aJllimits, terms, conditions and exclusions that apply. Frank Cowan Company Limited - 26- REPORT TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Report Number: CS 38-06 Date: June 26, 2006 From: Gillis A. Paterson Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer Subject: Public Meeting Notice of the Passing of a Responsible Pet Ownership By-law Recommendation: 1. That Report CS 38-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be received; 2. That a public meeting be held on June 26, 2006 for the purpose of soliciting comments with respect to the proposed Responsible Pet Ownership by-law; and 3. That upon review of the comments, the City Clerk present the by-law at the July 24, 2006 meeting of City Council. Executive Summary: With the implementation of the new Animal Services Section of the Clerk's Division, it was determined that the current Cat and DO,g By-law #6373/04 would need to be reviewed. Upon review, the current by-law makes various references to Pickering-Ajax- Whitby Animal Services and is written in a way that Animal Services is unable to enforce certain section (keeping of animals, public safety, barking dogs) and does not outline the updated fees associated with our service. Upon a complete review it is prudent for us to update it accordingly. Financial Implications: There are no financial implications associated with this by-law. Background: The Cat and Dog by-law has been updated a number of times, the last revision in 2004. At the present time, By-law 6373/04 has various amendments, and it is necessary to complete some vital changes within the by-law to incorporate the vision and mandate to the new Animal Services Section. Report CS 38-06 Subject: Responsible Pet Ownership By-law Date: June 26, 2006 Page 2 I) 6 Ii (., t In accordance with Subsection 238(4) of the Municipal Act, 2001, before passing a regulatory by-law, "a municipality and local board shall give notice of its intention to pass the by-law." Accordingly, notice was given of the public meeting on June 26,2006 in the News Advertiser and posted on the City's website. A copy of the notice is included as Attachment NO.1 to this report. To date no written submissions have been received in this regard. Highlights of the proposed changes are noted below, and a copy of the proposed by- law is included as Attachment NO.2 to this report. Highlights of the draft Responsible Pet Ownership By-law, as currently proposed: · Preamble to reflect the current Municipal Act provisions and title to reflect the current wording within the Municipal Act; · Implementation of 'Interpretation' section; · Implementation of 'Minimum Animal Care Requirements' section; · Implementation of 'Order to Restrain' process and section; · Implementation of the Animal Services Committee · Implementation of specific restrictions for dogs that pose a safety risk to the public · Address the matter of barking dog complaints · Implementation of restrictions for the number of cats allowed to reside within a dwelling · Increase in the number of dogs allowed to reside within a dwelling · Implementation of Schedule A (Licence, Impound and Service Fees) Attachments: 1. Notice of Public Meeting 2. Draft Responsible Pet Ownership By-law Prepared By: Approved I Endorsed By: ¿J .D\Q (\ vv.Q Ondsey Brenner -- Supervisor, Animal Services )" ' Debi A. Bentley City Clerk CORP0227 -07/01 I" ~"'- (' ,)", Report CS 38-06 Subject: Responsible Pet Ownership By-law Date: June 26, 2006 Page 3 ~,' ---~ ~.;. ,-- .-'- Gillis A. Paterson Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council ~, CORP0227-07/01 Report CS 38-06 Subject: Responsible Pet Ownership By-law Date: June 26, 2006 Page 4 · '¡6f"'> (.~ J ATTACHMENT NO.1 TO CS 38-06 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Passing of a Responsible Pet Ownership By-law TAKE NOTICE that the Executive Committee of Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering will hold a public meeting on Monday, June 26, 2006 at 7:30 pm in the Council Chambers, Pickering Civic Complex, One The Esplanade, Pickering, Ontario, pursuant to the Municipal Act, to consider a new Responsible Pet Ownership By-law. This by-law will repeal the existing Cat & Dog by-law, 6373/04. The purpose of the meeting is to inform the public about the proposed Responsible Pet Ownership by-law and to solicit public input. Any person wishing to address Council with respect to this matter must contact the undersigned on or before noon of Friday, June 23, 2006 to register as a delegation. The Council will also consider any written submissions. Copies of the report and proposed by-law will be available on or after June 23, 2006 during regular business hours. The report and by-law will also be available on the City's website at cityofpickering.com. Any comments or requests for further information regarding the proposed Responsible Pet Ownership by-law may be directed to the City Clerk at 905.420.4660, ext. 2153. Dated at the City of Pickering this 31st day of May, 2006. Debi A. Bentley, CMO, CMM III City Clerk CORP0227 -07/01 (' . '.. " t',· ð...~~ \)'~ J~'..LmR£PœT'~ THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING BY-LAW NO. Being a By-law for Responsible Pet Ownership WHEREAS Sections 9 and 11 of the Municipal Act, 2001 authorize the City to pass a by-law to (a) regulate animals; (b) provide for a system of licences, permits, approvals or registrations respecting animals; and (c) impose conditions as a requirement of obtaining, continuing to hold or renewing a licence, permit, approval or registration; WHEREAS Section 103 of the Municipal Act, 2001 authorizes the City to pass a by-law to provide for the seizure and impounding of animals being at large or trespassing and the sale of impounded animals under certain conditions; WHEREAS Section 105 of the Municipal Act, 2001 requires Councilor a Committee of Councilor an animal control officer of the City to hold a hearing to determine whether to exempt an owner in whole or in part from muzzling requirements of a dog, when so requested by the dog owner; WHEREAS Section 391 of the Municipal Act, 2001 authorizes the municipality to pass by-laws imposing fees or charges on any class of persons for services or activities provided or done by or on behalf of it; and WHEREAS the City of considers it necessary and expedient to pass a by-law to regulate the keeping of pets in the City. NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: Interpretation 1. In this by-law and in the recitals above, "animal" means a dog or a cat; "Animal Services Committee" means the Animal Services Committee appointed by City Council; "Animal Services Supervisor" means the Animal Services Supervisor employed by the City or his or her designate; Page 2 ;< 6R "Animal Services Officer" means any employee of the City whose duties include the enforcement of this by-law and related animal legislation in the City and includes the Animal Services Supervisor; "at large" means when an animal is found in any place other than the premises of the owner and not under the control of any person; "cat" means a feline of the species felis catus; "City" means the Corporation of the City of Pickering or the geographic area of the City of Pickering as the context requires; "dog" means a canine of the species canis familiaris; "lead" means a nylon or leather strap designed to restrain the breed of animal it is controlling; "microchip" means an electronic microchip encoded with information that has been implanted in an animal; "muzzle" means a humane fastening or covering device of adequate strength and design, which is suitable to the breed of dog that fits over the mouth of the dog to prevent the dog from biting or attacking a person or domestic animal but does not include a halti or promise collar; "Order" means an Order to Restrain issued by the City and, for purposes of sections 41, 42 and 43 includes an order issued under By-law 6373/04 or any predecessor by-law; "owner" means the owner of an animal and includes a person possessing or harbouring an animal within the City and, where the owner is a minor, the person responsible for the custody of the minor; "sterilized" means spayed, neutered, castrated or otherwise operated on by a veterinarian to prevent conception; "tag" means a disc or other shape of metal or plastic furnished by the City that bears an identification number and is suitable to be securely fixed on an animal for the purpose of identification; and "veterinarian" means a person registered under the Veterinarians Act. 2. Schedule "A" (Licence Fees, Impoundment Fees and Service Fees) is attached to and forms part of this by-law. ,'. Ö·,. :"i. )"1 (-,J , , Page 3 3. Unless otherwise specified, references in this by-law to sections, subsections, clauses and Schedules are references to sections, subsections, clauses and Schedules in this by-law. 4. If a court of competent jurisdiction declares any section, or any part of any section, of this by-law to be invalid, or to be of no force or effect, it is the intention of the City that every other provision of this by-law be applied and enforced in accordance with its terms to the extent possible according to law. 5. References in this by-law to any statute or statutory provision include references to that statute or statutory provision as it may from time to time be amended, extended or re-enacted. 6. This by-law shall be read with all changes in gender or number as the context may require. Registration 7. On or before December 31 in each year, every owner of an animal that is over the age of 12 weeks shall register the animal with the City and shall maintain the registration in good status. 8. Every person who becomes an owner at any time during the calendar year shall register the animal with the City and shall maintain the registration in good status. 9. Every owner at the time of registering the animal shall pay a licence fee to the City in the amount prescribed in Schedule "A". 10. Every animal licence issued shall expire on December 31 of the calendar year for which it was issued. 11. No owner shall provide false information when registering an animal. 12. Upon payment of the licence fee, the owner shall be provided with a tag and such tag shall be securely fixed on the animal to which it was issued at all times. 13. (1) The City shall keep a record showing the name and address of the owner and the identification number of the tag. (2) Any changes to the animal's identification, including sterilization status, shall be provided in writing to the City. Page 4 ;:~'( 0 14. (1) Every owner shall notify the City in writing if the animal is sold, gifted or transferred to another person within 14 days of the change of ownership. (2) Every owner shall remain liable for the actions of the animal until formal written notification of sale, gift or transfer to another person is provided to the City. Minimum Animal Care Requirements 15. Every owner shall provide or cause the animal to be provided with adequate food, water and veterinary care as required to maintain the health and well-being of the animal. 16. Where an animal is customarily kept outside, the owner shall at all times provide a structurally sound area that, (a) offers shelter and appropriate protection from heat, cold and wet conditions having regard for the animal's weight and type of coat; and (b) provides sufficient space to allow the animal the ability to turn about freely and to easily sit, stand and lie in a fully extended position. 17. No owner shall keep any animal in the City tethered on a chain, rope or similar restraining device that unduly restricts the free movement of the animal. Animals Running at Large 18. No owner shall allow an animal to run at large within the limits of the City. 19. Every owner of a dog shall keep it on a lead and under the control of a person when the dog is off the premises of the owner, unless the person owning the land on which the dog is found has given prior consent. 20. Any person shall be entitled to take charge of an animal found running at large but shall forthwith deliver the animal to an Animal Services Officer. 21. Nothing in section 20 confers upon any person the right to enter any premises. .) 17.of ( . , Page 5 Seizure and Impoundment 22. An Animal Services Officer may seize and impound any animal, (a) delivered to him or her under section 20; or (b) found running at large. 23. The City shall restore possession of an animal to its owner only where, (a) the owner claims possession of the animal; (b) the owner pays the impoundment fee set out in Schedule "A"; (c) the animal has been registered with the City; and (d) the owner pays the cost of any veterinary care received by the animal while impounded that the City deemed necessary for the well-being of the animal. 24. Where, on the sixth day, exclusive of Sundays and statutory holidays, after the date of impounding, an animal has not been returned to its owner, the Animal Services Supervisor may at his or her discretion and subject to the Animals For Research Act either (a) sell or make a gift of the animal; or (b) euthanize the animal in a humane manner, and no damage or compensation shall be recovered or recoverable on account of the animal's disposition or destruction. 25. Where an animal that has been seized and impounded is injured or should be euthanized without delay for humane reasons, or for reasons of safety to persons or animals, the Animal Services Supervisor may euthanize the animal in a humane manner as soon after seizure as he or she sees fit without permitting any person to claim possession of the animal and without offering it for sale and no damages or compensation shall be recovered or recoverable on account of the animal's destruction. 26. Where the Animal Services Supervisor deems it necessary to euthanize an animal pursuant to section 25, he or she shall first attempt to contact the owner of the animal and to permit the owner to transfer the animal, at the owner's expense, to the office of a veterinarian. 27. Any animals destroyed under this by-law shall be disposed of in such a manner the City may determine. 28. The City shall keep a record of all animals seized and impounded pursuant to this by-law. Page 6 Orders to Restrain ,'j ~7 t) (:, c., 29. The City shall investigate any dog bites and/or complaints relating to threatening or aggressive dogs that have been reported to the City. 30. Where an Animal Services Officer has investigated and has reason to believe that a dog has placed a person or domestic animal at risk of physical harm, the Animal Services Officer may issue an Order to the owner of the dog. 31. Where an Animal Services Officer has investigated and has reason to believe that a dog has bitten, attacked or otherwise acted aggressively towards a person or domestic animal, the City may issue an Order to the owner of the dog. 32. (1) No Order shall be effective until the owner of the dog has been served with a copy of the Order. (2) Service shall be effected by delivering the Order personally to the owner of the dog or by leaving it for the owner at the owner's last known or usual place of abode with an inhabitant thereof who appears to be at least 16 years of age or by registered mail to the owner's last known address. (3) If service is by mail, service shall be deemed to have been effected five (5) days after mailing. 33. (1) An owner who has been served with an Order may apply to the Animal Services Committee for a hearing. (2) To receive a hearing, the dog owner or the dog owner's agent must complete a written request for a hearing and have it delivered to the City Clerk within 10 business days of the Order being served. 34. Upon receipt of a request for a hearing, the City shall, as soon as is practicable, notify the owner and any victim(s) of any attack of the date, time and location of the hearing. 35. In the interim between the date of the Order and the date of the hearing of the appeal, the owner shall comply with the Order and the dog shall remain muzzled and/or on a lead. 36. Following a hearing, the Animal Services Committee shall determine whether or not to exempt the owner in whole or in part from the Order. ""'71'"\ t/ ", .-J V Page 7 37. If an owner fails to appear at a hearing, the Order shall be deemed to be in full force and effect as if no appeal had been filed. 38. The decision of the Animal Services Committee shall be final and binding. 39. Where an Order has been issued and no appeal has been filed, the owner, at his or her expense, shall, (a) have the dog that is subject to the Order, (i) licensed and photographed within twenty-one (21) days of being served with the Order; (ii) microchipped within twenty-one (21) days of being served with the Order; (iii) sterilized within 4 months of being served with the Order; and (iv) enrolled in an obedience training class within 6 months of being served with the Order; and (b) restrain the dog in accordance with any written directives given by an Animal Service Officer. 40. Clauses 39(a)(ii) and (iii) shall not apply in situations where a veterinarian states, in writing, that the dog cannot be microchipped or sterilized due to health and/or medical risks to the dog. 41. No person shall fail to comply with an Order. 42. When off the premises of the owner, a dog which is the subject of an Order shall be, (a) muzzled and on a lead not longer than 2 metres in length and in a manner that restricts it from chasing, injuring or biting other domestic animals or humans as well as preventing damage to public and/or private property; and (b) under effective control of a responsible person over sixteen years of age. 43. When on the premises of the owner, a dog that is the subject of an Order shall be kept, Page 8 2'74 (a) indoors in a manner that respects its environmental needs and prevents the dog from having contact with persons who have not consented to contact; or (b) outdoors in a pen or other enclosure that respects its environmental needs and prevents the dog from leaving the owner's property and from coming into contact with persons and other animals. Animal Surrender 44. An Animal Services Officer may accept the transfer of ownership of an animal from an owner to the City upon, (a) receipt of a written request from the owner accompanied by payment of the appropriate fee prescribed in Schedule "A"; (b) determination by the Animal Services Officer that the animal can reasonably be expected to be placed in a new home; (c) receipt of any other information the Animal Services Officer requests; and (d) space being available to shelter the animal. General Requirements 45. Every owner shall immediately remove excrement left by the animal on property anywhere in the City and dispose of it in a hygienic manner. 46. No owner shall allow the animal to make noises including, but not limited to, persistent barking, calling, howling, whining or crying at frequent or lengthy intervals, that are likely to disturb the inhabitants of the City. 47. (1) In this section, "dwelling unit" means a room or suite of two or more rooms designated or intended for residential use by a person or persons in which culinary and sanitary conveniences are provided for the exclusive use of such person or persons and having a private entrance from outside or from a common hallway or stairway. (2) No person residing in a dwelling unit on lands zoned residential shall keep or own more than three (3) dogs in or about the dwelling unit. " 17..·· ,) ,., t' J ' Page 9 (3) No person residing in a dwelling unit on lands zoned residential shall keep or own more than four (4) cats in or about the dwelling unit. Exceptions 48. (1) In this section, "guide dog" has the same meaning as in the Blind Persons' Rights Act. (2) Section 45 shall not apply to guide dogs. 49. This by-law shall not apply to active police dogs. 50. Upon presentation of a certificate from the registering agency, the owner of a medical aid dog shall be exempted from payment of a licence fee. 51. Where the owner of an animal is a non-resident of Pickering, and his or her animal will not be kept within Pickering for a time period longer than thirty (30) days in anyone (1) calendar year, the owner shall not be required to comply with section 7" 52. Section 18 shall not apply where on the premises of any television or film studio such animals are being kept temporarily for the purpose of a television production. 53. A veterinarian shall not be considered an owner of an animal for the purpose of this by-law where the animal has been brought upon his or her premises for care or treatment. Penalties 54. Any person who contravenes any of the provisions of this by-law is guilty of an offence and upon conviction thereof is liable to a fine of not more than $5,000.00, exclusive of costs, which shall be recoverable under the provisions of the Provincial Offences Act and all the provisions of the said Act shall apply to any prosecution for any offence under this by-law. Short Title 55. This by-law may be cited as the Responsible Pet Ownership By-law. Page 10 Repeal 56. By-law No. 6373/04 is repealed. 57. Notwithstanding section 56, any Order issued under By-law 6373/04 or any predecessor by-law shall remain in full force and effect. Effective Date 58. This by-law shall come into effect on the day of its passing. BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this _ day of ,2006. David Ryan, Mayor Debi A. Bentley, City Clerk "7 ..... {: I, '7""·1 " ~ . r: ( Page 11 SCHEDULE "A" CAT/DOG LICENCE FEES Replacement tag $35 $20.00 $15.00 $5.00 Unsterilized dog or cat with microchip Sterilized dog or cat Sterilized dog or cat with microchip IMPOUNDMENT FEES 1 S occurrence 2" or subse uent occurrence Daily Care Fee: Every animal that is impounded is subject to an additional charge for every day or part of a day after the day the animal is brought into impoundment. 1 S occurrence 2" or subse uent occurrence Daily Care Fee: Every animal that is impounded is subject to an additional charge for every day or part of a day after the day the animal is brought into im oundment. In addition to the fees detailed above, every owner of a dog or cat not licensed for the current year who is a resident of the City is also required to pay the licence fees in addition to the impoundment fees See Cat/Dog License Fees above Page 12 1)178'"'. (OJ SERVICE FEES Transfer of ownership of an animal that has been taken directl to the animal shelter Transfer of ownership of a dog, cat picked up by the Animal Services Officers, during normal working hours (excludin Sunda sand holida s Transfer of ownership of a dog or cat, picked up by the Animal Services Officer, outside regular business hours. $75.00 $90.00 1\ 7 (3 -' , {..J \, June 26, 2006 REPORTS - NEW AND UNFINISHED Audit Committee Report AC 2006-02 of the meeting held on June 19, 2006. 1. Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, Report CS 37-06 2005 Year End Audit 1. That Report CS 37-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be received for information; 2. That the Auditor's Report to the Audit Committee as submitted by Deloitte & Touche be received for information; 3. That the Management Letter from the Auditor be referred to the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer for any further action deemed necessary and report back to the Committee; and, 4. That the 2005 draft Audited Financial Statements for the City of Pickering be received and forwarded to Council for information. 2. 2005 Financial Information Return That the 2005 Financial Information Statements be received for information. 230 Audit Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, June 19, 2006 Main Committee Room 4:00 PM PRESENT: Mayor David Ryan, Chair COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Councillor Ashe Councillor Brenner Councillor McLean ALSO PRESENT: 1. J. Quinn G. Paterson D. Bentley K. Senior J. Halsall B. Wilson - Chief Administrative Officer - Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer - City Clerk - Manager, Accounting Services - Manager, Internal Audit & Control - Recording Secretary GUESTS: P. Jesty, Deloitte & Touche P. Colavecchio, Deloitte & Touche (I) ADOPTION OF MINUTES Moved by Councillor Brenner That the minutes of the meeting held on Tuesday, February 7,2006 be adopted. CARRIED Moved by Councillor McLean That the Audit Committee move into a closed meeting of Committee in order to discuss a matter that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose. CARRIED - 1 - r: 81 Audit Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, June 19, 2006 Main Committee Room 4:00 PM (II) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer Report CS 37-06 2005 Year End Audit P. Jesty, Deloitte & Touche provided a detailed overview of the Confidential Auditor's Report to the Audit Committee. A question and answer period ensued. A copy of the Auditor's Report dated June 13, 2006 was provided under separate cover. Based on the discussion, Mayor Ryan requested that the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer look into the matter of assigning timelines (business workplan) to matters noted within the Confidential Audit report. Moved by Councillor McLean That the Committee rise from the 'In Camera' discussion. CARRIED Moved by Councillor McLean 1. That Report CS 37-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be received and referred to Council for information; 2. That the Auditor's Report to the Audit Committee as submitted by Deloitte & Touche be received for information; 3. That the Management Letter from the Auditor be referred to the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer for any further action deemed necessary and report back to the Committee; and, 4. That the 2005 draft Audited Financial Statements for the City of Pickering be received and forwarded to Council for Information. CARRIED - 2 - Audit Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, June 19, 2006 Main Committee Room 4:00 PM 2. 2005 Financial Information Return A copy of the 2005 Financial Information Return was provided as a handout to all members present. Brief discussion ensued on this matter. Based on the discussion, the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer noted that the 2005 Financial Information Return (FIR) was not available on the City's website, however, once it had been reviewed by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs; the Ministry posted all municipalities FIR's on their website. He further noted that a copy of the 2005 Financial Information Return was available upon request. Moved by Councillor Brenner That the 2005 Financial Information Return dated June 19, 2006 be received and forwarded to Council for Information. CARRIED 3. Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, Report CS 35-06 Internal Audit Workplan 2006-2008 The Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer briefly outlined the contents of Report CS 35-06. A question and answer period ensued. The Manager, Internal Audit & Control noted that although a three year plan of audit priorities was provided, it would be reviewed and presented annually to the Audit Committee. The Chief Administrative Officer outlined the role of the Internal Auditor and discussions held in determining the priorities of the Manager, Internal Audit & Control. In response to questions, he noted that it was his desire to have an operational audit completed sooner rather than later, and he would work with the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, along with the Manager, Internal Audit & Control in pursuing this. Moved by Councillor Ashe That Report CS 35-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be received for information. CARRIED - 3 - ,', 8"Î l~ ,,-; Audit Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, June 19, 2006 Main Committee Room 4:00 PM 4. Capital Asset Reportinq The Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, provided a brief overview of the proposed new Provincial requirements for Capital Asset Reporting. He noted that this initiative had been in the discussion stage for many years and was now slated to be implemented by the year 2009. In addition he explained that this would require a significant budget increase for new software and additional manpower. He noted that at present there was no software identified and further, several other municipalities were trying to identify suitable software, with no results to date. He concluded that there are many concerns in terms of budget and value gained in regard to implementation and that further investigation would be required with updates to follow. In summary, the Chief Administrative Officer stated that he had significant concerns with the new Provincial reporting requirements and his concerns are shared by many other municipalities. He further stated that before any systems are implemented, the impact on all areas of business must be identified. He also express concern with respect to a significant increase to future budgets with no evidence that municipalities would receive additional value. He concluded by stating that the whole matter is still not finalized and that the City of Pickering, together with other municipalities are committed to extensive research/dialogue before any budget increases are made. Moved by Councillor Brenner That the verbal report of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer with respect to Capital Asset Reporting be received. CARRIED III) OTHER BUSINESS There were not items of Other Business presented. - 4 - Audit Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, June 19, 2006 Main Committee Room 4:00 PM IV) ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 4:45 pm Following the Audit Committee meeting, Committee members briefly met informally with the representatives of Deloitte & Touche for the purpose of confidential discussion relating to the reports as presented. No staff were present during this discussion. - 5 - Handout at the Audit Committee Meeting Held on June 19,2006 Refer to Item #2 '185 {JI . \. 2005 FINANCIAL INFORMA TION RETURN Corporate Services Department June, 2006 19.06.2006 13:51 f)8 (, \. Submitting: FIR and MPMP Version: 200S-V01 DECLARATION OF THE MUNICIPAL TREASURER Pursuant to the information required by the Province of Ontario under the Municipal Affairs Act, the following schedules are attached: Sêhedule Title Completion 10 12 20 22 24 26 28 40 42 50 52 60 70 72 74 80 REVENUE FUND RECEIPTS CURRENT REVENUE FOR SPECIFIC FUNCTiONS TAXATION INFORMATION MUNICiPAL and SCHOOL BOARD TAXATION PAYMENTS-iN-LIEU of TAXATION TAXATION and PAYMENTS-iN-LIEU SUMMARY UPPER-TIER ENTITLEMENTS REVENUE FUND EXPENDITURES ADDITIONAL REVENUE FUND INFORMATiON CAPITAL FUND OPERATIONS SOURCES of CAPITAL FUND FINANCING and EXPENDITURES CONTINUITY of RESERVES and RESERVE FUNDS CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL POSITION CONTiNUITY of TAXES RECEIVABLE LONG TERM LIABILITIES and COMMITMENTS STATISTICAL INFORMATION SINGLE/LOWER-TIER ONLY UPPER-TIER ONLY PM90 PERFORMANCE MEASURES: MUNICiPAL INFORMATION PM91 PERFORMANCE MEASURES: EFFICIENCY PM92 PERFORMANCE MEASURES: EFFECTIVENESS PM93 PERFORMANCE MEASURES: NOTES OPTIONAL PM94 PERFORMANCE MEASURES: QUESTIONS PM95 PERFORMANCE MEASURES: CROSS BOUNDARY SERVICE DELIVERY For the purposes of this Financiailnformation Return, the amounts disclosed on the attached schedules are in agreement with the books and records of the municipality and its consolidated entities. This Financial Information Return has been prepared in accordance with the Financial Information Return instructions. Questions regarding the information contained in the Schedules should be addressed to: Name. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . Fax. . . . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . , Email (Required). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , Website address of Municipality. . . . . . . . . Municipal Auditor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Municipal Audit Firm. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Municipal Treasurer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0020 0022 0024 0028 0030 0091 0092 0090 0094 Kristine Senior -1 ~ I I -~ I ~ ~/9/d Date ----~------- 905-420-4660 x. 2171 905-420-5313 ksenior@ciÎV.pickering.on.ca cit of pickering. com Signature of Municipal Treasurer Deloitte & Touche ~~-,-paterson 19-Jun-2006 ~;:æ'-~ Signature ~ ~ ($) 0050 Total Revenue Fund Receipts (SLC 10993001). . . . 64,879,886 0053 Total Exp. LESS Unfunded Liabilities (SLC 40 991015). 64,958,339 0054 Total Assets (SLC 70 9930 01). . . . . . . . . 125,901,833 0070 Outstanding In-Year Critical Errors. . . ~~.. 0 1 Municipal Data (#) 0040 Households. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E 28,983 0041 Population. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94,400 ^ ---~-~~-,- 0042 Youth Population. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,590 _.--~-~--- Province of Ontario - Ministry of Municipal Affairs ~.': 8 7 19.06.2006 13:31 ~'<,1'A EIR20Ð5: FJickering €: Schedule 10 Asmt Code: 1801 REVENUE FUND RECEIPTS MAH Code: 10102 fortbe year ended December 31, 2005 IOwn Purposes Revenue I Revenue Fund Revenues i 1 I ì n ..._J. I 0299 Taxation·OwnPurposes (SLC26919904-722899 07) ForUT(SLC28029912-28029908). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tH__n..._37."~2~27~J 0499 Payments-In-Lieu ofTaxation (SLC 26 9599 08) For UT (SLC 28 029908). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. [=.==-3.64~~5~ Ontario Unconditional Grants 0620 Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund (OMPF). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0630 Transition funding under OMPF. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0695 Other . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . 0696 Other .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . 0697 Other .. .. .. . .. . .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . 0698 Other " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0699 Subtotal Conditional Grants Ontario conditional grants (SLC 12 9910 01). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canada conditional grants (SLC 12 9910 02). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal 0810 0820 0899 358.851 I ..n '.1 47.6741 ~06.525 ! 1099 1299 Revenue from other municipalities (SLC 12 9910 03). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . User fees and service charges (SLC 12991004). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70.360 7.807,420 Licences, permits, rents, etc. 1410 Trailer revenue and permits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1420 Licences and permits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1430 Rents. concessions and franchises. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1499 Subtotal Fines and penalties Provincial Offences Act (POA) Municipality which administers POA only . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other fines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Penalties and interest on taxes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , Subtotal r~··--~ ._-_...__.~...._--~ j 550.'~11i 1.534·795j 2.085,406 i 1605 1610 1620 1699 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1865 1870 1896 1897 1898 1899 9910 other revenue Investment income From own funds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . From other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' Donations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sale of publications. equipment. etc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Contributions from non-consolidated entities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , Other Revenues from Government Business Enterprise (ie. Dividends. etc.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gaming and.c::asinoRevenue~-'."n'.:':" -" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . Other ! Sale of Land Other ¡Interest on Prorniss~rynNotes Other ! Miscellaneous 163.878 1.905.244 4,426.203 7,488,041 874.684 109,796 8.236 ;,. . . . . . .. .. ... .. .. .. . ... . .. . . . ... . .. . . . . .. .. , . . . . . . .... .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . .. . . '" . . " . .. .. . . . . . . . , . . . . " .. .. .... ... . . . .. . ... . . . . .. . . ' Subtotal TOTAL Revenue fund revenues 3010 3020 9920 Transfers from Own Funds Contributions from capital fund (SLC 50 3410 01). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Contributions from reserves. reserve funds and deferred revenue (SLC 60 1020 01 + 02 + 03). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOTAL Transfers 1m m~;~~ [.-..... ....._._._.__._..~...... 64.879.886 _..._-~-,~.__._- 9930 TOTAL Revenue fund receipts 19.06.2006 13:31 5010 5020 5042 5050 5060 Accumulated net revenue (deficit), beginning of year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PLUS: Total revenue fund receipts (SLC 10 9930 01). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LESS: Total revenue fund expenditures LESS Unfunded Liabilities (SLC 40 9910 15). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PLUS: Adjustments for PSAB. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PLUS: ¡-.-.- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5090 Accumulated net revenue (deficit), end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~,.,~---~._----_..~-' _ . _"_ ___.___.___m_._______ ."___ ._-_._~._~_.__....._. Continuity of Government Business Enterprise Equity 6010 Government Business Enterprise Equity, beginnin9 of year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6020 PLUS: Net Income for Government Business Enterprise for year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6060 PLUS: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6090 Government Business Enterprise Equity, end of year. . . . . . . . , .. . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . , 4010 Total of line 0810 includes: Provincial Gas Tax .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................... ........ _n____~~,~j _n -- 64ß79.886 1 r..... 'n' - - - ~958~i~1 -9,220 I L_~_~____ ..______----..J $ 161,515 Province of Ontario . Ministry of Municipal Affairs 0299 General government. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Protection services Fire. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Police. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Conservation authority. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . Protective inspection and control. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Emergency measures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provincial Offences Act (POA). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other ,., m "', '" "". . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal 0410 0420 0430 0440 0450 0460 0498 0499 Transportation services 0610 Roadways. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0620 Winter control. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0630 Transit.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0640 Parking.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0650 Street lighting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0660 Airtransportation. ................. 0698 Other i Public Works Centre . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 0699 Subtotal Environmental services 0810 Sanitary sewer system. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0820 Storm sewer system , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0830 Waterworks system. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0840 Waste collection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0850 Waste disposal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0860 Recycling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0898 Other . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 0899 Subtotal Health services 1010 Public health services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . 1020 Hospitals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1030 Ambulance services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1035 Ambulance dispatch. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1040 Cemeteries. . . . . . ...... . . . . . . .,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1098 Other " . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 1099 Subtotal Social and family services 1210 General assistance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1220 Assistance to aged persons. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1230 Child care ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1298 Other . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 1299 Subtotal 1499 Social housing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Recreation and cultural services 1610 Parks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1620 Recreation programs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1631 Recreation facilities - Golf Course, Marina, Ski Hill. . . . . . . . . . . . 1634 Recreation facilities - Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1640 Libraries..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1650 Cultural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1698 Other . . . . .. , . . . . . . . 1699 Subtotal Planning and development Planning and zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial and industrial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Residential development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Agriculture and reforestation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , Tile draina~e/shoreline assi~tance. .. ... .............. Other i.. .............. 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1898 1899 Subtotal 9910 TOTAL f¡1 O~~riO CO~it~~~rants Tca~a ~~diti~n~1 Gra;~" Ot;~~~:;;~;~~es ~I User F~~a::sserv¡éel 1 I 2 3 4 I $. $~. $..... $ I m ". I.... '. ~,~ L. "u. 26,~~ __.u. --=-. '206.,9641 34,239 ! 1.418,2~~ I -! , fÖ.792I J ~:1 . ..173}9~ ....=~.iO,360I===·...7.8Qi.±20 1 162.278 162.278 o o o o o o o o 17,880 I j t I i j~. I 01 10,399 ¡ 4,571+ . 21,434 L , 358.851 ¡ 4ÙÛ r -.. -----_.-~---~ ~ ---._--~-...~--..- 59.8921 .". J 2.041.1~ i ! .¡ . 'I 96,431 " 2.1[17,466, " 17.36il ··1 I 17,365 i __.,____..1 Province of Ontario . Ministry of Municipal Affairs 19.06.2006 13:31 ~~\'OI k=IR2005: Pickering € Schedule 20 AsmtCode: 1801 TAXATION INFORMATION MAH Code: 10102 for the year ended December 31.2005 c", Ii'- r: General Information 1. Optional Property Classes in Effect 0202 0205 0210 0215 0220 0225 N NewMulti-Residential............... . ... .. . . G Parking Lot (Includes CX, Cy, CZ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o Office Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S Shopping Centre. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L Large Industrial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other 2. Capping Parameters and Results YarN N Y Y Y Y N Decrease - Percentage Retained ,-- Amount of Protection for ! Net Tax Impact properties Back Properties CVA Tax limit CV A Threshold Value for Protected Properties CV A Threshold Annualized Tax limit 6 % $ $ % % 0320 M Multi-Residential. . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . 87.4% 3,817 3,817 10.0% 5.0% 0330 C Commercial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34.8% 991,401 544,481 10.0% 5.0% 0340 I Industrial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53.2% 279,409 233,290 10.0% 5.0% 3. Graduated Taxation (Tax Bands) 0610 C Commercial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0611 G Parking Lot. . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0612 0 Office Building. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0613 S Shopping Centre, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0620 I Industrial.. ............................ 0621 L Large Industrial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. Phase-In Program in Effect (Most recent Phase-In only) 0805 R Residential. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0810 M Multi-Residential. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0815 N New Multi-Residential. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0820 C Commercial (Includes G, 0, S). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0840 I Industrial (Includes L). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0850 F Farmland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0855 T Managed Forest. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0860 P Pipeline. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5. Rebates for Eligible Charities 1010 Rebate Percentage for Eligible Charities (SLC 72 2099 xx). . . . . 6. Property Tax Due Dates for Current Year To be completed by Single/Lower-tier Municipalities Only 1210 1220 1230 1240 1250 1260 1270 1298 R Residential. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M Multi·Residential......................... , F Farmland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. I T Managed Forest. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C Commercial... ....... . .... . ... . .. . ... . . I Industrial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P Pipeline. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other 7 $ 250 250 250 250 250 250 Middle Band Grad. Tax Rates Number of Tax in Effect? Bands % of Highest Band Rate CVA Boundary 6 Phase-In Program in Effect? 2 Year Current : Term of Current Phase-In Initiated i Phase-In 4 % 40.0% __m_..______________'.___ ~. ..--- ._-~---_.._--_._-----~ ------.~_._- ..--.--.. .___'__M_'__'_'_' . 'FiNALBii~g~tallments-~1 "---r- .-... .....-. -.. ..... .... om. -----··...------·······-----------···--...--·-·1 Installments ' FirstDue Date i Last Due Date i I i INTERIM Billing Installments i "";- 1-;;;'~;; --I "" ': D" # I YYYYMMDD ~I' YYYYMMDD 2 ,20050225 ¡ 20050428 2 1 20050225 20050428 2 ! 20050225 20050428 2 : 20050225 20050428 i 2 I 20050225 20050428 2 L 20050225 I 20050428 , I t 2 ........ 6 YYVYMMDD t , 20050715 I 20051014 20050715 20050715 20051014 20051014 ~......... 5 # 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 ì I - ~ ¡;; U'>' ~í i<i ..., -I g\ <D ~ ~l 0 0 0 ~! N I- CÒ 0 ,,; -~ '" ¡(,OJ CO, ~ ~í I- i~\ e: .2 "" I -¡¡¡ :-.::ti <J " ." W :ffii '" ,...·1 Q) !~! ¡;¡ Ñi I- <.oi l- => 0: r-' '" 'r- ~ '" ... 0, I- :~! I- "'¡ , (f) ¡::: -I 1 f!? ~ ! 'ü '2 ::J :;: o 'C: .!9 c: o 'õ II> u c: '5' e a. ~ i~i ~ :~: <1> ~i (I) 'C"')' ~ !~¡ :c wi <tI i~ I. --~--_.. z o ~ I>: o u. 3: ~ -I W <n o C- I>: ::> C- ~ W Z W C) ...: g I- re '" -I « ~ I- .... 0 I- '" ~ l- e: ;! .... 0 1ã <J " ." W ~ .... I- UJ~Efl ':J ~; -I . , x' « xl I- ::: Xi 0 ~I I- 0: , i , Ü ~r => ~ ~I ° w ~i '" ~ o,¡ ¡¡j I- gl I- 0> => ~I 0, I- ~¡ en 00 X' ':J ~I 0: e: Q) ~ Q) '" '" « Q) :c ~ I- O.æ ~~ fE~ CLLL to cfii - ----L .Q -¡¡¡ 0:: ¡¡j I- U'> I I -1 ! e: .2 õ.. '5 '" Q) ° '* 0:: ¡¡j I- ... '" '" <tI ë3 ~ ¡Ii e CL 1~I~m ~i~¡I~ ~ !\~'\-s\!il!I~I!lsj~lg ~1~\~¡I¡¡I~I~\~IOI~r~l !I;II~!I,~ ~i~!~ ~ øl~ Cl>1~1~'INI~I~1 !N Cl>I,N!, I,N I~I ' I I~ I~i ¡ I~i ¡LÔI I (, ¡...:,cô¡ ! LÔ¡ : ! I i I i I ~ I \' 1 L ~ jJ : I I ! I.L .lJJ_lJ.IJ_.LJ_ ¡~~I'~ íg: ~¡* ~~ ~~ ~i i~Ii1*l~¡ ~¡-~1~{~: ~: ¡ëJã! ~¡~I~" ~o fT~ Ig ~I~IN ~1~1~'NI~I~II~ ~INlm I~I~iM ~I~I~ ~I~I~I~ I I I~ '" C"') LOIN ,..-I(Y) r- 1('1") tOl ,-¡N_1 "'-I' ¡~ I I 1M 'IÓ' ,C;¡; ! Ñ' '''' ,N , I'... N I I I I , ! I I': i , ' , , ¡ , : : 1 I i ¡ i i I ! , I', , ' I I i I I I j , I I' I- ¡,J-~- ~ tl'~ ~ ¡ ~ i ~: ~ [~t ~ ~-~ 0Ttõ r~ -~T,¡,gll ~T. i"I··~rl-~T,' ~- -~-f,I-~¡'-~-Î,--~'¡.-~ ~-II ~ i~ ~ ~ ~i~ ~'~i~i~l~ gi~i~ rii~'~:~I~ ~i~I¡~!I~I~i I i~ I~ ~ ~ i$!;:! c.oìa>,~, C'\Ii.....¡ ~i~1 : :=;¡f'.¡C'\I S?·C'\Ii~1 i i......~ ¡r--: t.Ô: i......:ÑI ¡c-Ji I ,c-J i . ¡ i !! I~ 1"'1 ! I, Iii ' I " ¡ I~[~jl··~ ~I~I~ §I~ ª1.;I.illª ~i~IIII~!'JI~:~IªI~l~i~l+ °i~ I ~i ...... ! M' I......-;! i""" i~! ! :::- I ! I !..-!! I ~ iNi ; , i i I ! ì , I I ...., I ~ ~ §!~I~--~li~I~li·li§llil~iil.m-I'~lil~¡~1 ~ ~ g:~I~ ~ ~!~I~ ~ ~i~i~:"'" ~1~'lg:g'l : : :l:li:¡:f:I~¡II:!:i:E¡:!:I:I:i~I~'.! ~ ~ ~!~ ~I~i~¡~ §¡~:~I~:~i~'I~!~!~I~i ~ ~¡~ ~ ~i~I~:~I~I~I~!~i~ ~:~¡~!~ ~. ~i~;~ ~I~i~!~ ~ ~i~!~i~!~:~ ~i~i ......:N¡..-¡..-IN¡......¡O¡......I..-I......iN...-:..-'N!..-:..-: ¡ 1__+ ;1' , . I¡:T ' I . ~ ~1··~I:.~il~i~I.~i~:#I*i*i,*¡...~I·.* ~¡I~I.~¡.· ~ ~_§ ~ ~!~il~I*I~i~i~l~i~ ~ N ~i~1 o N.Ø ~ U'>O ~ N Nlol~lol~l~ ê!~i~j ~ ~i~ ~ ~I'~:~I~ ~i~ ~!~:~!~ ~:a>,a>! o 0 ~:OIO ......:..-:~!OIOI~:~:olo ~ióid' Q¡~! . j .r .1 J .!Jjj~, .. .1.- ~1~1~~~¡~I~'~~~~I~~I~~i o 0 O!OiOiO OIOiOiO:O 0iO oiol ~ ~ ~i~:~!~ ~I~LI~!~!~I~I'~¡~:~! ~I ~.! ~1~I~i~! ~I ~i ~I~! ~i ~..~I ~I~I °11~f~:~I~'O'!o¡o~~r~~~rg¡~r~:~: ~ ~læi~I~¡~ ~'g:~¡~:~¡~:~i~:~¡ ~1~1~I~i~lg!~I.~¡.~I~;~I.¡~I~!~:lg.i ~i~lq~I~!~I,~;..N.'Øq'I~!~i~:.'~,~1 ~IM f'.c.o Im!~1 : ia>I~INíØIN:.....: ~i N¡N LO:æ: i I;::: I I ! 'Ni I I ! ¡ i" , , I ' i ì ' ! 1 , . i ' I : ~Ú~II ~l§!~ ¡ §I§ ¡ ~11'~¡1 §; ~ r~¡ii§ i§1 ~i+ I~ir!=~~! ¡1=¡j ¡~I:'-¡=¡ o mIN¡INiOIO ~IIOiOloIOiO!OIa> 0101 g...~.I~ ~Igigl~ g¡~ ~llgí.,~i.·~I~!I§'I·,gil ~ ~!~ ælg!gl~i~'~ ~ gi~I;:: ~ ~ ~¡ ~!NIN N!NININI~~IN,NIN'IN¡NI~~. I 'f I !'!,:, i f ~ r ITI ¡ II r I ::11 I,: ¡ I :=iæ =I=I~¡~ ~: , I, ,:: ,CL CL CLI I'. I. Ii' I. I I ¡~ll!'è!Iè!I~!~11: . ! I I i í¡; : I æ æ Æ¡IÆ:æjæ Ð51 ~I~ ~¡~il~ ~i~l~ ~I¡~'I~ ~I~II~ ~i~I~I~11 ~I~ 11811~I~iI8·~I~il}.8t ~ ~jI8·t'I~I~18·~181¡ i: ~iffi ~I_ B æ _!~ ~'_I~ ~,_ ~!æl_I_~: cti t,,1 ~ ~ ',.', ~llcti)l~i ~ :.Icti I, ~J~ !cti,cti f.~i,¡j ~.' ~¡~u. ~~æj,...1 ; I !!! I Iii ¡ : i ¡ i . i I ¡Ii i I I ¡ : I ! ) i ~I~ I! i II ¡11111¡i¡iilil~1111 i i i,l~i ~1~ ~;~,~ ~lui~l~iO.O u UI~¡~I~"5!~1 Q) Q) ooislE E 5151&1%1% 5!,5.SjSIElOOi Q)! ] ],,~I~I~ljl!fl.~llj! .tEI:.~\! ~I~I]!. j . ! I' ì i I I j 1 I I : : ¡ :1: I:[:T: l,i:11 :[¡:I: r: ¡: j:i: I:!: J Ü ~ i-¡-'-j-lI-l,:J(f);(f)l-l-lI-I-:-C'O¡Ü: I I : 1~I:::ei~'~ :;:{¿ l~if2i~'fg ~ I~IN¡~:Ø 00 "'I~ ·~.I.~ g ~ d ~jd cry l+ . : : ! i ißI~!~ ~ ~ I'~ I~.o .1 i,' ~ ~ Ó!Ó¡""":¡O 1 I . , ¡ I : ið;I'~!~;:~.i~ i<.D ..-1c.ci~l~ 18!~!!;;;;:i~!~ !tDl~I~;~:b; [0 0100'0 , ¡- I I~;~!~'~!~ l:;i:E1g:á1:g 'LOIf'.ICO.COia> Ifgrfgl~I~:~ °1°1°1°1° ¡~-j ~--j-~-¡~¡-- 1~!o18'o!,,- I~i..~! _iC!,.'<"!, OIf'.!OO'~íC)' ~I~ì~ q:~ jOiLO!N oo:::r:N 1~IØIN !ffi I I, ; i ~ ~ o 0 ~~ I 1m T I '-'! I >Æ i' >Æ Ice 0 i§¡ê¡ê .jm! ! !oio¡:o C) !8 g ~ g 'g,...I¡1J g I~!cii~ ci . I i I . o ~ U'> 00 N "': ! ¡ ! : ¡ !a¡ia¡¡a¡¡'a¡.a¡ ! ë3.. ¡ '5.1-·5. '5.1'5. i::J ::::J :::::J ::J ::J '818'8ì818 1=1='='= = => "J" I ::::J ~ :::::J !~-1-~ ,--~_ --~ ¡-~ I I I i i 1 '- . '" ! i I ! : ~¡- ~ ' - , ! ' LL. i CO 'I' 1,£11.", i a¡"~ 1 I~jlijiill ~i ~ ¡~IÆ ~ ä:j~J<3 I- '¡.~ Ii 1m:. t !Q 1:1 0 I 0' 0 0 ,.0. --'! ë: ! : ¡ ! _____ ---r---''''f'----¡ j -----1---- °i ~1C>;t;;:!t:::Itl:II=,t5 -I I' ,__ _1...._ ' ;S~~o~~~~R; ~oo~C;0c>08 ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~g~ ooo;go t· (9 '1 / r-' T I ! ! ! I , I I I I ¡ t i I I ì I I , ''':'1 !~I :::;;r: i côl I I ¡..-.- I I : ¡ I I) Ið! ! ¡ I , I Ii I I I I I I i I I -- ~ I - C> .... '" ¡;; ,-', gt!, -' -' -' '" (.J 0 ~ g ~ .... 0 0 N W l- I- 0 m '" '" ~ ~ l- I- e: e: ::: .... .2 0 ro "" '" u u ::> ::> -0 -0 W W '" Q) 1;j I- ~ .... I- :::> I- '" :::> ~ I- ~ -' <f' x « x b :::: x x x l- x ó <f' u ~ :::> ~ x 0 x W x x '" Ó Q) ro a:: 1;j I- <f' x l- x '" x :::> ~ x Ó ~ l- x en x co x x x x Ó z 0 ~ e: 0 ::E - a::: C1. .¡:: f2 u æ ¿¡ ~ .9! w & -' ¡¡¡ ~ I- ~ ~ fd Q. '" en ¡g a::: w Ü ¡:: ~ W 2i -' C) -' e z ~ CL iñ f2 a::: w ¡¡¡-g ~ I-¿¡¡ w ìš UO -' b2tx: Ñ ~ <=> - C> C> 8 .... en ~ en ¡;; ''''I I~ M IM1 -' 't- ID ¡:; '''' 0 o¢ 0 0 N I-- I i u; 0 ai .J '" '" ~ I-- <= .2 1'i5 u :> "0 W '" ~ I-- I-- => z 0 ~ :IE 0:: 0 u.. I!! æ ~ ~ -' ~ LiS 'õ 0:: ï: < :> g ::;: õ u ~ W D. 1;; <n ï: 0:: :E w ~ 0 W .¡: D. .!!! D. 6 ::> õ ... Q u ¡: 'S: 0 è: ~ I-- <= ~ ... 0 "" '" u :> "0 W I-- ~ ... => '" Q ¡¡¡ I-- I-- en ~ ... I-- -' r-·· i I i...... I I;:: I :: I I::? ! i ~I I ¡ ie..:> ~I I=> ~ ~, 10 IW ~i .,1 ~I- 0,: ~i x I , ~ , I-- 0> => ~i I_ I cf!i 'I-- Xi len §j ,- co i~ 61 E Q) ~ g¡ fßoi ~ ... Q) I :i5 1-' I '" « , ~ ¡::gi I-- 185 ! f¡j i5: 0 ~ c::: <.0 ~!~i§ 0 :; i~i- ~ u.. 1-----1 0 I 0 10 15 : C) 0 0 0 c::: '" 0 ~ ~ 0 !C! '" I-- e:> <= .2 ã. "5 ß .æ & ~ I- '" '" '" a ~ '" & ~ e D- o I-- ~-g '" 1--'" CD 00 ~~ g¡ en "'... ~ :.i §..i. ~ ii' ~-[I!¡I ~¡ !/W1 !i.1 ~I!I ~:I!-~i'II., ~r!lli.1 ~1~1.:. ~I §[ ~¡f~I'~ Mi ;,- ia:> : I...... "Ctl ¡"-I('I") LO¡t- ' Iv, I ' ·1 -... "'-, . I ''''I , I _I' : I I '. ¡- i. 1-' ! ."'- "', · ! I I : i! 'i" i i I ¡ i i i I IV LLLJ.Ll J "LL J.JJJ.LLLJLJJJ ') 9 ') (J ,I I, '. L. V 81~ g 8 ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~1~lgi~ ~lg!~i8 g ~ ~ ~ â ~'~Iâ ~ ~I~ ~ ril~ ~I~ ~iâ!~!~ ~¡~Id -...- "',... ... 0 '" "',co v'l'" o·...'IO>'...'CO.<.O.OIOIO> o ~ ro;('I")'~I"'lv Ol~ ~ a:> OIN WIOiM:NIa)¡t-IO> ~:Ñ ó¡ciici ~ ri ~IIØ! '~¡~I ì Ici!~[Ñ'~I-Ñ ~ coIN¡ ¡......i('f')1 N NI ilt'>¡CD ¡ I......¡ : i N ''''I : ¡ I-I i II ! I I"" : I-Iii I' , ; : i ! ! I, ; i ! : ! ; I : I ! I i I I ! ¡ i ! I : i i ! I ' ] j i i ! ~ ~ I ¿) ~I ~ 1~[~i~~I:~¡~ i~¡1 §l~ I~ I ~ ¡~¡I ~T¡r~I~II¿11 o ~i-f"'I"'i~i~i<.O<.Oj~i<.O -I-!"':"'!~."""'I~!~,_ ~ ~ Iii ~ f ~ I ~ It ~I~I¡~¡I-~I~ ¡~làl¡i[ ~ ¡ ~I ~ I ~ ¡-~ i ~¡~ ~ ~i~'~!~I~ ~I~i~ ~I~I~I~ ~i~i~I~!~!~I~¡~ O!-I-'-¡-¡~~"'¡"'f"'i"""':-!-~"""'l"""'¡"'I-I= I I I I ' 'i! I Ii i I I ' i ' I 1 ' ; I rõ!:~õ!!õ!I~I~I~ <n 'i i r I I I l-gl~ -g:16i~ICD I:!! I I I: ': I ' ffil~1 ffi¡ ffil~ll! ~ i I I I .J::CJ).J::.c:CJ)ClJCf) ¡ ¡I¡ ~1!-g!¡:I¡I,-g:-gI¡I'-g:¡¡¡I-g¡~:t:~I~'lt i t B GliB ~ ~IB Õ ~I~ õ ~IÕ ð ~1~1151~1~ ð 5 5 888 ¡g E 8 8 ¡g E 8 ¡g'8'8 ¡g ¡g 81' ¡g'E 81818 ~ ~i~ ~1~I~i~'I~'@I'~'~I~~~ ~I~I~ ~I@j~l~ ~ ~ LL(LLr i > ¡ u.. ~ ì !U i > ¡ u.. r W ~ u.. ! LL ! W : UJ~ u.. : W : ? I u.. i u.. tl'LL _I I,:, 1 ' , I_I Q)I Q)' , ¡ I I I .~ ~11~111111.lfl~¡~li~lilil i!iiillil!il~i~li~llfl'111 - ~ê ê êl~'~I~I~I~I~ EI~I~ m ~i~!~ ~I~ E £- ~ i ªiié3! 8.1 ¡s I~ ~I ~ I~ Iª¡~f-~I~i~i~ i ~ ~ I ~I¡S¡ªJ o o!~loio:OjOO!OIO¡~IOjOIO¡~IO¡~IOL~l0J~j b: ~1t5!Ö¡Öiöit=!:2J<SJ~i~t~Lt>j~1~¡3lõfl~I=JBIGI i ¡!,! I :::J:::J i~¡8!8 1:5:='= 1~1.f¡æ i:;! I 1< ' :~ !~:-, IC¡:êI-g ! ~! m! co I' <n ,:¡¡¡ i. ê ;¡!&~ I-- t . 1 3iC;:o 0 , t------m-¡ §i~!~ tL: g~~~~~~~~~~~~ cøO__,,-,____oooooo 00 ¡g8 ~~ :;G81î 880 '" '" f:õ Lõ 00 o '" _ ~Ng ò 0 en r-~--T-: II ~ i~! I-- ,~, ~ jLt)! o :;!: Eßr ri ! ~ I 'i I '" I 0 '" "0 W ì I ~ ('f') fA- IU):::>~ i ~! II--) ,-¡gj ¡':§: 8¡ I 51 :ri 'I~!~ . Lõ ,_ ~ Eß:M i I!::; r ' I!? ~ õi C- 'u ï:: :J ::; 'õ è:' -¡¡¡ ï:: ~ o .¡:: '" ë o 'õ Q) u c: '> e a. z Q ~ I-- g U> I-- Z w ::E I-- U> :::> i3 < ..,J ï --; SZ" -; Í " o b:: U) Q) 'E ~ e 0. e ~ ;S ::> Q) :¡¡ c: ~ [ '" "- .- ¡jj ~ '" iii oñ Q) 'E ~ e 0. .E -If! .§ U) '" ~ o ~ U> W ~ >- ~ z w ::E w .... D.. D.. :::> U> ...; ~ c: o '@ (J) J!i 'E o oñ 0. 0. '" ~ U) ~ 1:- .!9 c: Q) E Q) Q. g- U) 1'6 o 1'6 Õ I- '" '" " '" ;':;l !......, ,,¡ : ffi I ~I J (J)! "II " , ~I "'I I 1 , 0;;;1 :1 èD: 1 ¡ , , "j LO , U">, ~j i 1';;1 I'~I .18, i O!I iLO: I~I I I 1__, r::,;-¡ I~I 11lj :¡¡!, , I I I ~-i i~i !~I llil 1 [ II ¡~I I ~ i I~I i~1 .. -:;¡ ~ 1i'! I- ~ .., .. ~ .... g I- w ~ ~ ~ c w ~ .... I-- Z :::> o ~ cO o 1R .... .... ã:i ~ g c w c c < U> I- Z :::> o ~ U) U) Q) Q) ~ ~ '" U) '" .c: Q) .c: 0 Ij !~i .~ c: E Æ 8 J9m8~œ~1: ¡¡¡ ~ 2 ~,¡g fir 111 æ I co .§ :§..~ fi .I~i·~~i~ U) ~ ~ ~ m ~ 'õ $ ~ ø š~Ææ~j~~ð ...: ~ I I :/ I ~ I I :1 ¡ ~I i '" 1 ê: I I 111 I ~i I ~I .§_.J LOOLOOI.OOLOOr-O ~g~~~g~g~~ :~-T^Or.;:~ ì ¡ fd ¡ ; : fd I !N'! r iÑ) ! Lõ! lõ! Ii' 1 ì I I I I IlL Ig¡r-T-~-Trel I~I I I~, I~I I i~' I I / ì ì I f ¡ ¡gl IC'o!.I 1:;;:[ '......¡ I I 1 I ' 10 r- I¡;¡¡ 1"':1 .......! "iã Õ j$ '" U> ¡!! z :::> o ~ z Q ~ I-- DO: W ::c b :[ ~I ul ~I ~11 ~ ~I tr: 51 ~~I l 51 i; :iiJ I -§, ¡¡¡ 1.__ 'C: c: ~g 2:~Q) "æ s :5 0::::>0 cO ~::5CO"l gg~¡g I -f-, I~j i~1 I~i I -r~-: I~! i...... r;;l I~I [!;;of I~I , I I I , I 1 ' L___I iil I~I I~I I - ¡:¡¡!, I I I ' i I ¡--- -I I~I 'I~i ;::'1 i <0 I I ¡ i j ! lu-I !~¡ i~i 1';;;-1 ¡"'¡ i ! ]! z '" U> '" .. 'It .... .... ~ ~ c w ~ .... I-- Z :::> o ~ ~ g en o '" '" '" I!? ª « m Q. ·ü ï: " ::¡ õ ~ Uí ï: :¡ ¡;; M <D o o N oD o ai o ." .!!! c: o Õ Q o " .;; e Q. I I ¡ II! ¡ ~ #11 II~igl'~i..·~ g g I ~i~ <.altO 0 0 L-¡·!·I ; loiolNIN ~ ~ d§I§ ~i~ b; b; l~i~I~!~ ~ ~ ,..-i......iNIN N N ! I:j B ~. 1~li81' ~ £ 1-5 ~ ~ õ I i~i~! i j I I~I~I';; ~ l16i.2:;oI-õ'1 ~ i II ~ I ~ Ii! ; =I~I~!*!~ i,r, <.9 J:j 101 = i~d~¡~j.~J~ 1 , i ~I! C"') I 'I:!:: i I : :~i~Ië6lëõ!ëõ Cõ ! 1IIIi~I~!~i.'~ ~ :~ & &!~!~I~ ~ N ~!ir=,~IOIo¡o 0 -~J§.: Lm¡ 1 i ; t-i !LL!Ø: : ~:O!~!~i~¡Q ~ ~ & .....J ! ¡ , i i #1 ,..... XI en x, co ~! ~ ~i ói 1 ë 0:> E :g g¡ ~ -' ã: Õ.g} - m IDa:: ~- 0:> => a..u.. .Q 16 a:: X m ,..... <= .Q Õ. u '" 0:> o ~ ~ ,..... ::> w ::¡ æ rh ,..... z w :::E ~ W tn o D.. a:: ::> D.. ~ W Z W CI ~ ~ ¡¡¡ ë:3 ~ 0:> 0- e a.. ~-g ,..... m CD üa b::b:: ...: g: '" ... on .... 1.;;.-;.;-01.... O>~O> 0>- '" i co I 0> '" '" ~I ~ ~1~1;4 I~I IN ~ , I 1 , I : ' j ! I. ~I~ 11 ;[.1 515 imlN r : i , I I I I I I I~-li-~:~i§ ~ I~ §l'§i~ ~ I, I II ~~ I :"#.?fl. o 10) C"') 81 I~ ~ "'I '.... I'- !O) :~ 8 i~1 ' :....; N 1~1~I~j~ll~ ~ 1~1~!~!~.5 ~ i~t~I¡~!~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :~i~ ~I~ g R ~ ~ g ~ g g g !~i~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g g g ~ ~ re ¡~!~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 101010jo 0 0 0 0 0 ó 0 0 ó 1\511' ~i.·~ iR ~ r-_i"'!l~ :.,g r::1~¡I¡:¡ :"""':,"""':i~_-- !~i~I'"--¡ ;......1 ! I .... .... .... .... I I ïLOrCO:O a> r- ! MI. 0>.1. 1'-11 ~ '" I'~!."ll~. r- 0"> M'''<;j-ir- frl!U') I , I ~I ]1 I ¡ i ;#í X, X x· gl ~1 ~, ~' ~I >;, o , I , ....' , o CO 0 ~§~~ ~I~I'~¡~'ß °lo:o'o~o oi01~1 1'-.' è'$i. ": I "!.I "!.I 'I ''''-I ~I~IOOIO>IO> 0 101"" M...... I I I IN 'N I I ~ "'<, I I 'I I I": I t i !......: I I i :oqo¡ I Iii Iii I I ,I; 1 i I I I ' I I I i I L._",_L-L-_'--,LJ_J__" _..L_~_J ;;-.:..! ;;-,'1. ;;:;T';:;¡.. ¿;-.'I· :;;11-.;1;;--.1. ';1,. ~';'.,'.. -~-I.! ;;".' "'II I ~I""I .... -I I . i. I'" 1 I ~~: I ~I i I ! I i ~ ¡ : ..- , ! co I I! ; t 1M ! ! ii, : i : I I~ I. ! Iii Ii I· ¡I;. ! I ' Ii, I Ii: I i i i I )' i i i i j , I I I 1'-1.'';''1;'" '1';' I. .;,-1 .;1.;1 .;1-';1 <:::>L.~. ';--.','';-'1 "" I ~I~~~:~I Iii '~i ("I')IM ~ Ojr-¡ i i! I !......¡ !"'liNO>i~li i II i I : ! I~I I I; I ., ' ¡ . 'I I I ¡ I Ii, 1 i .. ¡ , I ' 1 '. I. I I ¡Ii i' '~i ';'1 ':"'11'", ¡ ....'.1 ':"1. .;+-!' <:::>¡.; !. 0 looT. ~ I ";;-1', tD¡M COiN:......;, I; ~ IV "!.I":. ~IV_I~I' í I ! ,IX!.. ~ .... "'I ml ("I') ! : 10 ("1')..- -.::tiN:, m I iN: !~; ! i I ~ : i ...... ! , , , ' : i ! , I I : I'- I'- 0> N N on '" '" on CÒoo:i"LÔ .... 0> N ~15 0">1('1") CO:...... ..-¡~ CÒ,cD m;...... i L ~ :::{¿ ?ft <:>.... 0 N CO N CO '" CO 0"'0 U')o~ M Lr:'! M ~ ?ft '" '" m~ ~ ~ ~ CO '" ;:;:; .... ""! :::{¿ :::{¿ .... .... '" '" I'- I'- N '" I'- I'- 0> 0> 00 ~ ::{¿ CO CO N N 0> 0> 00 CO CO '" '" o ci 000 '" '" 0 CO '" 0> Ñ ª ~~ u; ~ ~ ::{¿ 000 I'- I'- I'- ;# ~ ~ 000 000 c. 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 8 NNNLO ""': ""': ""': ""': 00 <:> 0 <:> <:> <:> 0 '" '" ""': ""': i = tn 000 <.9u.. ÜÜ ffiC:OOOOOOC:OOO ~Lõ~~~~~~~~ "" '" ... ~ u x ::> ;:? ~ 0 x UJ ~ '" 0 2 '" IX: 1ij I- 1f1 x l- x ::> 0> ~ x x 0 I- 1f1 x (/) X <0 X ~ ~ x 0 '" "E '" E '" '" æ r- ... ~ --' ë: 02 ~& u:> ~ <> - iß"'3 c.."- z .Q 0 ~ ê6 IX: U") :E 1ij I>: I- 0 "- æ ~ :::> UJ :ë ::¡ <= " æ .Q en Õ. ~ 0g z '" w 0 .... :E "* ~ c.. e:: i:5 1ij l- I>: « f!! ~ ;rg U w « c.. '" õi en '" I>: co Q. W 13 ·õ ¡:: ·ë ~ M " W '" ~ ::E ....I C- o C) ~ e z c.. '" iñ -0 è:' ,ñ 1ñ 0 ~ ·ë I>: I- :ii w ¡¡¡2! ¡:: I- ~ I- co ("oJ (/) '" w J) :J 0 1:: ~ '" UO l- E ....I ~b2 (J) "- 0 :J e:: 0 N OJ <> c ·5 en g '" ~ 0 en § a: .... .... en .... en 296 (J) (J) --' --' ë: ë: <= <= ::! .Q 0 ê6 1ã (.) <> ::> ::> -0 -0 W W (J) --' I- ë: ~ I- ::> ::> (J) --' ë: I- (J) ~ ... ;;; M <D o o N to o ~ ~.,. :;!:.,. en -' l- ii: :::> ~ .,. I- :::> en -' ä: en -' ii: I- .,. en S I T ¡-T ---T- r-; ~--'I ---\ goO 0 0 0 0,0 01 0 01 0 ~I~ ~I~I~I~I~I~I~ ~I~I~ ~ ~i~l~ ~I~I~I~ ~I~ ~I~' I ~ ~i~ ~1~lol~l~ ~ ~1~I~i I g ~ ~ ~I~IO ~ glo ~'~I~I old old d did 0lclO d ci I I I , , I <f'. ü x :::> ~ ~ 0 x W ~ U) c) f¡j 0:: ~ I- <f'. x I- a> ~ :::> x x x c) I- <f'. x en x co x x ':i ~ c) z 0 ~ ::IE ~ 0 ... æ ::::> w ::; æ rh I- Z ~ w ::IE ~ ~ Q. ïij i5 Co 'ü ~ 'E ::J -' ::E :$ Õ (.) 1:- w c.. 1ñ (I) 'E ~ :E w i7 0 ~ W 'e: c.. '" c.. E ::::> 0 M Õ Q) u e: .~ C. ::¡ co U ~ <") ~ g e c.. I- ~-g N I- co CC üO ~b:: m ... '" ë Q) E U) U) g¡ ~ -' ii: ~!o 0 0 0;00 ~Io 0 ~! ~¡~IIM ~ °ioloÎN ~ m m¡ ~1ri ~'~!~i~i~IÓI~ ~ ~, ~"I.<,,).~IOI~i.NI~I~ co ~'.CO,., <ql~ --1......._1 _,v_i i<"l ""t C'\!.I~ ..-i...-!.......~N, I~ Nlm;...- ! ¡ ! ¡CD i I I I ¡v ¡ L ..[i fJ I In! I¡i[ . 1 I i I I I I I i<f'.1<f'. ~I~ ~1*11'~I~¡~II~'I~,*i,*: II ~ <f'.! l§ § ~¡~'§I§i§l~i~ ~§'§i§1 L ~ Ii ~ ~ ;.' ~.¡!! ~11~J..1 §,i ~I.¡. ~) ~i~'l:.. ii' §... ....' Õ¡O ~I~ ~,~I~i~!~i~!~ ~I~' ...-¡....... N N N1N10¡.......:...-:--!....... --!-- · ~j II: JIIIHIIlflll¡:j'f: -S-') '; (01 mlCJI91 <D- I iij¡I-E'I-ö ~ ~1ij¡1~1:"'1-ö1'O'~-E'ij¡ I ~ I 5.101 ffi ~ I- -5. I- æ I æ æ I I- 101 "5. :(I)ol§I~I~:~ ~1-'88'~I-I=I~I~11i~1881 loQ)~I~ I I ffim~:!!fIQ)1 I~ =I~ 0 ~ 1=1 ~ U u 8 C¡= 1~I~YI~IÆlæl~læ:>'I~ ~læl~l~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~~, ~ ~ I~\~ æ ~llæ ~I~,~+~ti~ ~Iæ ~ ~ 'z I l -! - ~ - I ; i~i I I ! I. ¡I: i ¡o: I I ii, I I I Iii I~i ;~, i: I I I I I , I 1'8frni!¡ä. 11 IÆIÆ,IÆiÆiÆ,iÆ.¡ W ~~!rolro ro ro ~ e ~:~'I~lei~1 ~ ~i~'~¡~ ~ ~~; ~i~l~ ~1~I~i I~I&!!&!,~!~ ~ ~1~L81818¡ª18ßI 3¡~ 0'0¡010 ° °lo[ofolololo'o t¡; II ~ ~! ~ I ~ I. º 9: 1.c....II.·~.·.··.I.;5: ! >..Ic... r~ ~ I -: ~. ~ .~l_l <..) l<..)L<..)lU 1 '~I' <...r i~ 1M: ~_ J I I ~ .,. --r- I~ I"'" ,= ¡en i I i I I I I c: ,2 15- l5 .!! '* 0:: ~ I- ~ I I I --t J --t I I I ' , I nl 1 ! -1 j--- I ~~re~ g ~ ~ ~ o~ ~. ocooo ~~~~ ~ <=> ... '" co CO ~~ 815 ~~ " (' 1 {.. , :::> w ::; æ tÎ> ..... z w ::E ~ a.. ~ ¡5 z w ::E w ..... a.. a.. :::> U) ... ~ c: o ~ en .I!i "Ë o u; 0- 0- :::> ~ en ..... c:: ~ l!! ~ Q) ã. 0- :::> '" <õ '5 J§ ~ a> a> ..... a> ~ co ,..: Ln Ln. ... I <D' Ln' !()). !cò !~ .....: ('")' ,0 ! rei ~j iN ! co' i'V ! !~¡ ,0 a> q: ¡..- r~T~T~T~~1 0 10T;;T~¡ , ! .1 <Ò' ,!. '" <ÒI I I ;~II ! ' i :~ 'i~, I I~' I : l' i I I i I __L._L , I . , I l~,~~. __LIJ <D Ln a> a:i ('") "< <D .... "! Q) ]j ]j .., -:;; Q) D:: .s oS .~ >< .c .c "' " " ..... ..... V> V> U) ~ ..... ë: .., ..... .. g .~ ..... ..... V> ..... ë: ..... < ..... e ..... w ~ ~ ìii c w æ¡ ..... :::> w ::; æ tÎ> ..... z w ::E ~ a.. vi o a; a> :::> w ::; æ tÎ> ..... z w ::E ~ a.. ~ c w c c < V> ..... z :::> e ~ '" U) Q) Q) e> e> '" U) '" .r: Q) .r: U ~ (.) t:: .fi 5 (I) g m Q)t5 ~~ffl u~ ~8E ~·i81ß~"E~ ~$iE~~ ~ g?~3:°·ë~c. e "'C ""C ~ ""C c: .5 .§fåffi·~~~m cg~(])Q);~:§$C:Q) ~~(f)æ~~~ð cD 8o~~g~~tì;f$ oo~cogggg~~ ~ z :::> e ~ :::> w ::; æ ~ z w ::E ~ a.. D:: w :I: ..... e '" m "C: e- .æ c: UJ o "C: '" U) "E m 0 "C: E ~ .g c: ~ g ~ ~ .~ () oa..~ E E ~ ,g,g.g "¡:: 8 ~ "5 .., c: '" c: o ,¡; U) "Ë U) c: g ,1<' s => §"§" II II UU ~~ >- >- ~ ~ '$ '$ J9 J9 .r: .r: 0) 0) "I:: "¡;;: >- >- Æ Æ ïij ixi a:: a:: ..: Q) g ":; éÕ d:~ E ,..: .g ~ :1 ü 5"< II g ~ ~ 2J ¡i .~ :2"'CQ;. ~ fä E o ø ~I "~1i U) ~ ~ ~ .., 0 æ .m .§ ~ ~ .~ ~ :Š ê '" ¡fi jg ~ 6 "~;: :;; 5~¥-ð ~~~Lñ~g~~ cococogggg~ c w æ¡ ..... :::> w ::; æ ~ z w ::E ~ a.. ~ ~ oö o a> a> a> c;; ¿.; '" o o N <Ó o ~ ø i~l ð :g\ ¡o\ '" , i§1 g. ¡~\ (f) 1~1 Œ i~l ,I 1 I '* I J I~I (!) !~I m ! ,2 ¡ :c 1#1 '" "- l[õ: w 61 r:r: ! u.. u :g :~1 "- '''' !~! c.? ,¡::I z w I i U> '" .s ~ ë: -ö .E Ë 8 .9 .g 0. ~ "E m .g Õ ,g ~ .t:: U m '" .9 "0 .s¡ .5 ~ '6 '" ! ~ ¡'j '" "0 W 0 '" ~ ~ '" "- 0 "0 .s¡ 'C: m J! u; c: '6> 0 ~ 'õ '" ° " c: 5 '5 '" e D.. i~""'E>9 ,Õ~ '°:°1° 0:,0\ lO!OIOiO!O I ' , I ~LO·-.::t1J,..iCDtNi "Ei INICO, ~I""I ~i~ '~¡NI I~ ~I ~ ,"'" "'I 01 "'0", ' ~1Cf.)...- I ~lw ~ff: I!, ì ' I ~:l~ ~lfli1~1~i~1 ~ ~ !~!~¡LO: !~I ';;';1 g. I~¡ I 1 ¡UlI ølwO')Ef).V, i I I'¢¡ ~'Iø "I i : , i J-,z I' I ~iW I ~I I " ' ! I "'0' fgl~IMIr-...llõl ~ig lri C"?I I iq¡ ~1.g :LO! !;1;\ ,21"- '" "':' 'I ~:~ ~:I..L.. , I Iii ~ 1'~101,~I~',,~i g\ IMI~í~i :--ì ! : ¡......: 1 ,I " : I I : i ' l-~\~¡~t~¡~1 Ió'i.i 19¡,1~I~i 1'" "'¡'~I~' i~\ iO')~J~\ NI I~i""i '['!I l"j . LOk)II.O[''''I'r--..: "'I ,I'- "" 1'-1 I~ !~~I~L i'¢! ì !......ICD: , : I ' ! i : ' 1 I I , , ; , ' , I ! , , i ! !ß ul~lgISI~II§11 :!iIO'ISi51~! æ ¡~!~ì'¢i;æ I~ æl~lffi , ' I'- "'1~1 ' 1 i~ì !I'-'I 'oj:~, ~ "i: I: ! UJ ! i I ...J ,~I ' ~ ·',I~;'21,:~I.~Iª:li ~ 11'~"i! '~orn :ól"-:: ¡ó o '-' _ <0 Uit'N¡ I : :N I- i~: ! g ! i ' i ! ~ 1~1~1~1~!~1 I ;<'J;ol""I'-I"'1 ! :~i~!~1 :~i l~~_'o! ; I I-¡ => ILO'; i !~I : U) , I :§Il: ¡ I !~ : . , '. I i ëõ ;-__¡_,.____~ ¡ __j :.~ ;c'lìco'_lcoiLOI ¡"ël 1~I~i~ffili~1 :~! i.<òIW!,.tÔi.M-- : i~ :~ ~iLOI re ì (f) 'uii'! ItÔ i~..q(f);N' i ! ,N, 1----' 'T-l: I 11'-1°'."'1"""'1 ,~ !~~iol IN' ,WIr----1W' ,...., 1"""'1°' I~! MIC'o!.C:ì. 10' ! i..q LOt !~I ' ; .~ , 1 l ! ' 11.;"tl:OI..''''¡....:"J.I...O'.. '" ''''1''''1'- co lCO 1.0;...-' ~ :C;; ~igji !~ ~"',~:~I : .' ¡ ; : :! ! I i l !""IO;....I....¡~; I~ !~!~!~I 16' ICÕ~ÑI....:' LOI ...-10> CO, IMI ...-¡M COI cv:i! I ¡__ ..q-: I ' . I i I I '" 1~~I:~I~lfl~1 ~OTI!Ts·I'~11 ~ 1'- N ..-I~ <'J 'IN "'-10 LO ~ ¿~IN ~ Ó t--i~~ ....J M &9- 0) I ~ 10) NI I 1 INI ~ ¡ I ,I Ii: I ::2 , ! I II I I I ¡ , I I I I I I : I I j , " I'!~E-".--'->:---· ·':,,~~I' ~:,:§ìll~II~llí~Fl~r~í~i '"-' ~".. '"-' ......- t5i. 'I¡gl~¡.ìñ! ¡en c; ¡;:!:I~lmI81~1"'-' M t--I"'-I 1« (J) iÒ.I'....:ïl.Ó!--,~ --:! 'ÑIa5:Ñ ~ B N-!q!~JI"'-¡ !i~J, 0), ..IM ~,I~ ctI oð Ir-¡ I ! ,r-, ¡I: I 1--, :~ :s ,¡ l' I: ' ! ¡ , i ¡>- ß : 1 ¡ i ~. i~¡of~lg¡':! I~ IªI'~I~I~!~ ~. I~I~II~II !< « 16 CJill.Ói'_::i"lO) to-: ic-Jl..---- 1..0) > CO~,"-ILO!COI IMI M iN COIN 1·J5 s¿."'- ¡q I' : I.I~., ..W i :N:O)¡ ~ ,r--- ¡ :r-II ì 1 ;>-LLLJ I__~J j Q. '" e C) '" .. .. (3 ~ .. Q. e "- ,¡g ~ ë Jg.~-o~ 55ë æ ~ ~E§~ æ~æ~ 00000. ...- LO...- v 8gEECD :1! o ':IS '''' rn I!! ",ë õ=ªð _..J":¡ ~ .~ ~I:D i5. 5i:g~g- EroÉ.r: ECLOcn 8 00000 NM~~~ aoooCD ¡ I~r 1°1° I' , i \ I I \ 1 , I ' ! I ¡! II ¡ i~li~ 1~1 i&¡I~_ ,'" 1'-\"'1" ''''' ~ ¡C? rei i !re I ! 1 ! I 'I \ I ' , I I;j~ IJ \~t¡1 1 I Ii i ~~j.,~II]lf'~,'~I' II I ' ! II ' II ' , ' , i , II ¡ ¡Oicoi r~1 :~lâll~i !~,¡gll~l I 'I ì I I' I , .. I ¡""old", 1~1.~·1·&1·~1 !,.~:..' i.~I'~~! ,~~I :~' !~!g,I~1 i~i~l I. '.I.I! ..1.1...1.1 Ii ~t,1 ° "~I 0 "I ~j ¡!gl 18 ",I ~ 'I: ~ \' ~' I IV_, ."<I.M",N- 01_ ~ ' ¡~'I! I~ ¡~I~ I I I"': , !...:i II"'! i I"" i II ¡ , ! II ;SI~I!1 is,o\~¡li~ ~I~I,~I~~I'~I I:_'~:~I I~: ILri ~ .~i ir--,~ I . , ! ¡ 'I"'" 1'~1 i~jl J L ili[~l9 ffil ,'.~,'..,¡::I' ~l''''i¡ ~ , i~ : i 1 ì j Ii I 10';010' , i , i I r- (O'M !~i8,1~_i ::gì~i:e\ , i I ! : co-I r-tcoi i(D!~¡I::g1 :.~i.~:~i . ."-, ! ' , I I··¡·····¡ j !,~;~!~i "'ICOiM' :~,,~:~I c)'l.Oiw c; Póir:::~¡ MI ,r--!Ñ,öl g: I~i~)?~"i ~, :N,N!VI :~'c.I:)).~.! ........¡...-,("')I :~¡~:~1 !~I~_~I IM.("'),CO; ¡ . ! ' i ··!-t: ¡R",i~I'~1 ¡~:~~i M,N,LO! ,r-¡r-Vi Ñ:Ñ,'lril .. ' , I '~I""'''''I ."~-.·"',i~ I·~~I~ ,""""'~ 1.011.0-..- ~:~I~i ~ .c '" rn 1....1...;:..:.:1 IP!lo 1ªlgl~II'i!B:i.. :cii~I!;i! ~" '''''1''''1'-11 .1~:.:ff¡I'~1 '00 lfii~ u;! I'~: i~i~I~1 N~ !...-i..-iMI tC'\l 'I [I I' ¡ ~ .c '" rn õi ~ '" "0 .E ~~ ~~ "0 .E 000 ~~... "''''~ 00'" 1.·~I:fri l"l "': "'N lOiN :NiL!) :ó ¡"" i I i i~lor1~ 1 I j I '" '" 'Ie .;~, me(/) æ~~ ê3ä:1- .¡;-"O 2:- ",I!!J!I ""me: :ߣ -£i ~ :E(p.g~ ~ð~~ G.t :ei' ~ <C ~ ~ ~ J9:! ~i:D§~ ...J><~>- ~~~::2 >-:;;08 '" m ~~ $:;; E,s <cO ~~!~ ~~~! (00).0') Ø)Q)CDQ) :~1010ìor~II:~;I'or~1 [Ol'o¡~lll~o¡0í!l C") I ' 1M 1 N N ~ I MI I 1""1 1"', 'I'" I I I' I~I ~ I I i I ! I I I II 1 ; I I i I ! ! Ill' J l i l' Ii : I ,I I ' ~ 1 ' 1 ,1'.'~i~1~[OI~II~I~~II~IIII~I.ol,ioll·l~(;I~I'~I <Pi ; I 1(01 '.', .'. '. I i < -:1 ILOI~.~1 : ! ¡ ¡ : ; i I I ! N¡ I IN " ; , II '[II! I! .. 1'1 i ! I II Iii 1:i'.¡~¡.01~;,.¡:iI.I'~0+-1·'~·lllo ol.i~l 'I~~ ~~tiip! I "<1 ; i '~I ...-- '00-:. I i «!.¡ 1C!01_i C;; ! i 1M! ~ I~ I II I~i I~ ~i 1M: i I 1M 1 , I' ,I' " ~I.' V_LO_I ' I I, II'! I ~! '~IN ¡ i! I, I II Ili I I I I j , JLi ILIJJJJJ ~ r~:O~~OII~ !~or-IOFTI~I ¡~OQI~I~ ¡ror ~ ,"':1 INI ~I,"'!.I i "'!., iiJl II ~ """',N I' : INIII~: ; i i~111 i Ii II o , I' ' I I' I ' ~ I i I I I I 'I I I : I l! I II j I l:u T""--'-' --,.-..,--~-.,.-.--, !(l;;o!PJloi~! ,"':' ,"':. IN,: 'æl !~¡.' '~l' ,,,¢" . ,..q '" "'! ì . (j) ...J ã: e: ,2 ro u ¡"ª ,W .11,. . -. 1~~1.113101~1: 1M: ir-; :..- !~, i~i :~I I' !.~' i...-I I."': ,~I.O (fl'''-' . I :...- l<:o¡ I i~1 ' ¡ ~f - --+ ~---~ ~--- !:~! ~~ 0 ælOi~ 1'!g·_I~! '~I 1": 11...J 299 .. 'E .. o m õ o .t:: ... rn $ CJ) ...J ã: Õ e: o "" '" Ê .. is .. e: :3 e: o u "" 1:: .. "- "'-°l('l')<q- ~I I~~ r-I íO v 1.01"""('1') ~I ~~ , 1 ___.1 '11'-" ~ -r~¡I~I~10~1:~1 !iFI,O;I~~I~ll¡;r~ ~ b1 !~r I~I ~I I: ~ I 1« Õ N &9-¡CO! 1...-1 01 !~: I m 0)1 B: ~~, I I INI : i I I I i I <'J I~~ l~r4~¡"'I!~ Illt:o:~j~l:ol~ IOlfo J I~ ~ ~1¡;11"1 :,y ! I 14 i~115r ~, l_~mLJLj _ l_~.1 ~__U l_. J_, d e: o .. >< .. I- Õ :II .. :::¡ .5 ~ '" E ¡;o D. Ñ Q. :II e C) '" '" .. (3 ~ .. Q. e D. ,¡g ~ ël ~~-c~ c CI) C Q) ~.~~~ ~~~~ oocoo .......u-:» -.;to..- 00 ...-N ...... ..- ...... ...... CD ~ :IS '" rn 1! B ..;g .::J rn I '" rn ~ :f $ ~ "0 .. .!!! ..a ~ ";..J ...J~.!!i¡5 šä:§~ {!..9~ ~« "0 ;..J ~o:: ,¡g:;; E= <cO :,g '" e: õ=ªc3 J§ ~ ~ .~ e:g~2: ~m=,g ED..Ocn 8 '" '" ~(j) ctI::::! ,(3"- ..¡;- ¡ij :~ë ~£j ~Æ g: CLOCl) õi 'e: 1;; '" "0 .E I~ =>...J "0 .E 00000 N~¡;:j;;ç~ ~~~......CD ~..·~·rJ ~ ~ ~ ~!~l~ ...-....- en ...- m ChCD CÐ..·m .I!! C ., E ~ ë w 'õ C 0 - '" ..0 I!! 'C 1;; ~ is « ë ñi 0 Co - 'õ .. ï: ¡;j ::> .... :::: 'õ Õ '" ~ ., 1;; ::J ï: .5 ~ iJ 51 0 E .:¡¡ ~ ë D- O ..; Õ '" <.> c: .:;; e 0. Q; £; o 11 m 0' mi ë5 ~.' $ O;.J:: ~ en Ig to v >-! Q) c........ ~ Iù: Æ ~' c! ~i 8..; '* .5!~ C6 ("') (/)10 c........ ....J ¡e: Q) õ: iW en c, ~¡~ ~; æ .9"0 _ ., ~~ 1ñU) "'--' ~ã: U) --' ã:~ --' > ~~ ¡2 .... U) ~ rn ., rn 'C ~ ~ ä: C 'õ w ., .. m 0 ~ "0 "0 'C os os J!! '" c C 0 os os C tn U U 0 0 0 0 N 0 '" '" ¡¡¡ g ;:!; i <D oi~l··~ i I I , - t m¡ ål 1.1)1 ¡.;¡,ml,., i ~! I '"l, I -: I ' i ¡ Ii IO¡r,o, I i~1 I !~i , N ! H-¡ i~I~~ !.....:CX)¡ N¡tD¡ , I : i I 1!1 ¡ f; I 1~!<o;f'1 :~¡!;;:! I ' ¡ I... I :q ,- ,- ! I I ' I I i~!O cq¡ :I.O¡ ! ...1 ~I , ¡ i i,..L_Ll I , (m··¡-r !~i~! ¡OiM1 :~¡c:!ji ] , i I ' io¡~ ,a> I~ H.L _ I ..[,1 -' ~ rn e. ¡2 ~ õ Æ c: c:: 8 õ ~ ~ æ .~ ~ 8 .:~.~ ~I . ~ ..¡: 2t rn rn ··Ë ~ . 0 ;., E ¡¡¡ UI "1: . ~ e :2 m f ~ Q) ~"'C co ~ c.9 ~il . e--, 0~~I' ~~ ø8ro~~~mm~~ ~ë."" 9~~ ,:J:g>~~n:l::os<¡;.r!Ji.s >< E ¿ .I!! J!! <.> "C'- 0 _ f2 è:"" e-"O "0 co .~ ~ ffi ..c:: .g"¡:: l So gf .;¡ -§.:8 IV ~ .:!! c: (þ ....w::;: ~~'E}j !., 0 C:~'t::'50Jc: os:g ~~~ro~8w~I8~8~--~~c ¡l~~I~~~ojg~~j~~~~ ~ Æ~~~S~83~~8@~lo c5 :iõ~ ~~g}fJ~~~ LOI.t)I.()I,()LOLO...·~ ~~~~~g~s:?gm ù1;ù1;ù1;ù1;ù1;;:¡I;:?¡!Ræ:£ ¡;:; ,;; '" o o N <Ó o oi ~~~ I- ~ g 5 ~ ~ ~ cij~<: ~~ê <c- o ~:;; I- .~ c 5 8:~ ù:í :: I-~ => '" .....J.2. (L~ .~ =ijj ~;§ en - .~ .~ I- Q) "---' §:~ =><c Q) 8- 5 (L > - Q) f!!--' Q) Æ E{!J ~8 :r: Q) ~8 I'! CI) :;::I .:. CI) ~ ..... E ,g .æ c CI) Iii ~ c W ~ CI) :;::I .:. CI) <>. <>. ::> --' <c I- o I- N "Ë ~ c g>~ ï5.. en c-=> ð~ õ" ...., " Q) :::; oS '" c: '" E >- '" (L c: o WJ!! ~ § I- 0 ~ E .c:<c Õ .9 "0 '" "0 '" "C:=¡ <cCD §~ o E <c ~ '" c: Q) Q) ]¡~ C- C- " en v M N ~ ëã C- "ü "¡: " ::;; ~ ;:: ~ .3 c; N o ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ :! ~ (0 ~ g ~ ...... co o 0 N N o 0 '" 0 o Ñ ~ 0 N M ~ ~ § 000000 3D1 o o o o o o o - c CI) E CI) œ¡ c W ~ CI) ¡: .:. CI) <>. <>. ::> ..... ¡::Ç ~ r- ~ 0'> ~ § ~ § ~ Ñ N o ~ ') n Ii R 0 il1..cJ bt;Ontario . Ministry of Municipal Affairs 6810 6820 6830 6840 6890 6899 Total of column 14 includes: Unfunded Post-Employment Benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unfunded Solid Waste Landfill Closure and Post-Closure Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Construction Financing Debent~~es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal __'_'_...._._'_____U__'_' H_ 8210 Additional information contained in Schedule 12 (CMSM's only) Total of column 3 includes: Revenue received from other municipalities for services delivered by CMSM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2 $ o 329,512 "_..._'-,._-----------~~- _.__.__._~--- $ Province of Ontario . Ministry of Municipal Affairs ~ D256 13'31 .. . :?'OtJ$<W1 &'182005: Pickering e Schedule 50 Asmt Code: 1801 CAPITAL.. FUND OPERA.TIONS MAH Code: 10102 for the year ended December 31,2005 SOURCES of CAPITAL FUND FINANCING Capital Fund Revenues 0205 0210 0215 0220 0225 0230 0235 0240 0245 0250 0255 0260 0265 0298 0299 Long term liabilities incurred Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ontario Financing Authority. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial Area Improvement Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Ontario housing programs. . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ontario Clean Water Agency (OCWA), . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tile drainage and shoreline property assistance programs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Serial debentures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sinking fund debentures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long term bank loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long term reserve fund loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lease purchase agreements (Tangible capital leases) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Construction Financing Debentures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ontario Strategic Infrastructure Financing Authority (OSIFA). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IH'.'--- ~ .._'_'.'m_______._.__~_ .m_.' _._.._____.,,_._.__._. '" ,. __ ._..0__________,._.. 1 Other ¡. ... ... .. . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . . ... . . . . . .. Subtotal Grants and loan forgiveness: 0410 Ontario (SLC 52 9910 03). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0420 Canada (SLC 52 9910 04). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0430 Canada Gas Tax Funding (SLC 52991010). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0499 Subtotal 0699 Other municipalities· Grants and fees (SLC 52 9910 05). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other financing: Prepaid special charges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from sale of land. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from sale of hydro utilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from sale of other capital assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investment income From own funds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . From other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Donations. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other IÒeveloperContributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other ¡Miscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0810 0820 0830 0840 0850 0860 0870 0897 0898 0899 Subtotal 9910 TOTAL Capital Fund Revenues Transfers from own funds to capital fund 2010 Contributions from revenue fund (SLC 52991001). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2020 Contribution from reserves, reserve funds and deferred revenue (SLC 52 9910 02). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9920 TOTAL Transfers from own funds to capital fund 9930 TOTAL Sources of capital financing . -----_..._......_~,~_._~.._~.-_.~..,- 3098 APPLICATIONS of CAPITAL FUND FINANCING Capital expenditures LESS Unfunded Liabilities (SLC 52 9910 09). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transfers of proceeds from long term liabilities to: Other municipalities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unconsolidated local boards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Individuals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal 3210 3220 3230 3299 1 $ 171,216 357,003 52,259 1,009,870 ---_..--~------~-,_.__.~----- .-- $ 11,286.580 3410 3420 3499 Transfers from capital fund to own funds Transfers to revenue fund. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 743,041 I i Transfers to reserves, and discretionary reserve funds (SLC 60 0420 01 + 02 + 03). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~~b~O~I1,~~:~;j T0r.~~ Applic!l!iO_n~~!~~?itt~~~~~~g_l~~__-~_·..-.y~30.~_ 9940 5010 5020 5040 5050 5060 Capital fund balance, beginning of year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PLUS: Total Sources of Capital Financing (SLC50993001). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . í LESS: Total Applications of Capital Financing (SLC 50 9940 01). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i :~~~: Arj~~mentsf?~~~~B:~:__:~~:::u:"'l: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : '. : : : : : : : : : : : . r 5090 Capital fund balance. end of year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5200 Capital fund balance, end of year, reported in line 5090 is analyzed as follows: Unexpended Capital Financing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LESS: Unfinanced capital outlay to be recovered from: Taxation or user charges within term of council. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from long term liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transfers from reserves and reserve funds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other !Donations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unfinanced Capital Outlay Capital fund balance, end of year 5410 5420 5430 5498 5400 9950 . --,."---~-.'------'---------~--"-'--"-"-'--' .'_.._~--~.-----.~ Total of line 3098 includes: 6010 Short term interest costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6020 Total of line 0410 includes: Provincial Gas Tax. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. . Total of line 0420 includes: 6030 Canada transit funding (Bm C-48). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 $ 7,043,941 ------. 9A65~581 -u12.430,7461 '--1 1 J 4.079,053 $ 6,688,119 -,.-------.----- 298,375 2,609,066 ~==~079,053l ---,----~-"-----~~ Province of Ontario . Ministry of Municipal Affairs . , q. ". 13:31 """"'" F1IR2D05: Pickering C Schedule 52 AšmtCode: 1801 SOUR.CES OF CÄPITAL FUND FINANCING AND EXPENDITURES MAl\! Code: 10102 for the year ended December 31, 2005 'J ~ 0299 General government. Protection arvlell 0410 Fire . 0420 Police. 0430 Conservation authority . 0440 Protective inspection and control. 0450 Emergency measures. 0460 Provincial Offences Act (POA). . 0498 Other 0499 Transportation services 0610 Roadways. 0620 Winter control. 0630 Transit. 0640 Parking. 0650 Street lighting. 0660 Air Iran~rtation . 0698 Olher l~~jc~Works Centre 0699 Environmental services 0810 Sanitary sewer system. 0820 Storm sewer system. 0830 Waterworks system. 0840 Wasle coUectíon . 0850 Waste disposal. 0860 Recyding . 0898 Oiher 0899 Health service. 1010 Public health services. 1020 Hospitals. 1030 Ambulance services. 1035 Ambulance dispatch. 1040 Cemeteries . 1098 Olher 1099 1210 1220 1230 1299 1299 1499 Recreation end cultural servicel 1610 Parks. . . . 1620 Recreation programs. 1631 Rae. Fac. - Goff Crs, Marina, Ski Hill. 1634 Rae. Fac. - Other. . . 1640 Libraries. 1650 1698 Other 1699 Planning and devewpment 1810 Planning and zoning . 1820 Commercial and industrial. 1830 Residential development. . 1840 Agriculture and reforestation. 1850 T~e drain~e!s~~j~_.a_~~~~ 1898 Other 1899 Subto!.ll 3699 Government Business Enterprise . 5099 Non-Functionalized Amounts . 9910 TOTAL Ontario Canada Canada Gas Tax Funding Other Financing CAPITAL Expendilures CAPITAL Expenditures LESS 10 $ '-874.5001' 12,838 .. oj 1,'27.4741' 274,472 917,82B -------___~J 3,207,192 : 0299 Balance, beginning of year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Revenues 0410 Contributions from revenue fund. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0420 Contributions from capital fund. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0499 Subtotal Development Charges Act 0610 Non-discounted services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0620 Discounted services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0630 Credits utilized (Development Charges Act). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0699 Subtotal Development Charges Act 0810 0820 0830 Lot levies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subdivider contributions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Recreationalland (the Planning Act). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investment income From own funds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . From other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Building Code Act, 1992 (Section 2.23). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOTAL Revenues 0840 0850 0861 9910 Expenditures 1010 Transferred to capital fund. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1020 Transferred to revenue fund. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , 1030 Charges for long term liabilities - principal and interest. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1040 Development Charges Act - Credits utilized (Capital Fund). . . . . . . . . . . . 1050 Development Charges Act - Credits utilized (Revenue Fund). . . . . . . . . . . 9920 TOTAL Expenditures 2099 Balance, end of year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . íObí~a¡öry Res~FUri~-¡' DlScretionary'Re5.' FundSì-"~rvés--Î i Deferred Rev. , I i ! 1 2 3 I $ $ ¡ $ I . .._,. ····--------··-·····l 21,824,9881 2,2~1~2j_________1~,~~~~.I 193,987! 193,987 ¡ 2,836,143 1,257,271 165,494 341,627 173,054 3,256,828 3,414,200 1,422,765 23,238,366 . . ~111)1 1111005: Pickering e Scl1eâule 60 Asmt Code: 1801 CONTINUITY C>F RESERVeS AND RESERve EUNDS MAH Codø: 10102 for the year ended December 31, 2005 Province of Ontario - Ministry of Municipal Affairs Totals in line 2099 are analysed as follows: 5010 Working funds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5020 Contingencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ontario Clean Water Agency (OCWA) fund for renewals, etc. 5030 Sewer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5040 Water. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5050 Replacement of equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5060 Sick leave. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5070 Insurance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5080 Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5090 Post-employment benefits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5630 Lot levies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5660 Parking revenues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5670 Debenture repayment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5680 Exchange rate stabilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current purposes 5205 General govemment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5210 Protection services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transportation services: 5215 Roadways. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5220 Transit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Environmental services: 5225 Sanitary sewer system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5230 Storm sewer system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5235 Waterworks system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5240 Waste collection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5245 Waste disposal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5250 Health services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5255 Social and family services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5260 Social housing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Recreation and cultural services: 5265 Parks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5271 Recreation facilities - Golf Course, Marina, Ski Hill. . . . . . . 5274 Recreation facilities - Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5275 Libraries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5280 Planning and development. . .,. ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5290 Other iConlinl,l09s!uiies ... ............. ...... Capital pu rposes 5405 General government. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5410 Protection services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transportation services: 5415 Roadways. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5420 Transit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Environmental selVices: 5425 Sanitary sewer system. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5430 Storm sewer system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5435 Waterworks system. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5440 Waste collection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5445 Waste disposal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5450 Health selVices. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5455 Social and family services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5460 Social housing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Recreation and cultural services: 5465 Parks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5471 Recreation facilities - Golf Course, Marina, Ski Hill. . . . . . . . . . . . . 5474 Recreation facilities - Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5475 Libraries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5480 Planning and development. . . .. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5490 Other [City's Sharefo:r~C-Projèëts~~··_·]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Obligatory reselVe funds I Deferred revenue: 5610 Development Charges Act - Non-discounted services. . . . . . . . . . . . . 5620 Development Charges Act - Discounted services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5640 Subdivider contributions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5650 Recreational land (the Planning Act). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5660 Building Code Act, 1992 (Section 2.23). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~w TOTAL ') 'î9 19062006 t;jI31 J "---,- Obligatory Res. Funds. ¡ Discretionary Res. Funds Deferred Rev. : I Reserves I 3 $ I .~_~Io§.oooj . .. .. 1Q.774.~11J 2 $ L I L_ L 915,514 589.575 331,579 20.000 .. .484,204, 0299 Cash and temporary investments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts receivable 0410 Canada. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0420 Ontario. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0430 Upper-tier. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0440 Other municipalities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0450 School boards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0490 Other receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0499 Subtotal Taxes receivable Current yea(s levies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Previous yea(s levies. . . . . . . . . . . . . Prioryea(s levies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Penalties and interest. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LESS: Allowance for uncollectables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0610 0620 0630 0640 0690 0699 ............................................. . .......................... . ....................... . ............. . Subtotal i 0805 0810 0815 0820 0828 0829 Investments· Canada........ ........ ........ ......... Ontario. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Municipal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Government busin~~s.e.nterprises.. ,.". '-' -".' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal ! 0861 0862 0863 0864 0865 0868 0645 Debt Recoverable from Others Municipalities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . School Boards... ............. Retirement Funds. . . . . . . . . . Sinking Funds. . . . . . . . . Individuals. . . Other ......,................................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............,..............,......................... . 0830 0835 0840 0850 0890 0898 9910 Other financial assets Inventories held for resale. . . . . Notes receivable. . . . . . . . . . Mortgages receivable. . . Deferred taxes receivable Other .,........................................ . ............... . .......... . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....,........,...............,......... . ....... . ............... . ,............... . Subtotal ................,........ . 1010 9920 9930 8010 Other Assets Inventories of materials and supplies, and prepaid expenses. . . Market value of Investments included in Line 0829. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................,......... . .,...................,..,.................... . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . ................ . .......,.. . ,...................,.... . ,...,.................................... . Subtotal TOTAL Financial Assets . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . ........................ . TOTAL Other Assets TOTAL Assets - ------.~-5;'.¡79_:_¡j361 . . 'i,1á5~29á1 2,142.959 j 884,206 , 367,0001 10,325.099 ! 893,1291 11.315,629 I 'n n _ ~--- ..- -1 _33,.5. 5B....4.27..~ 31,079,1291 76,846.314 I ........ . Province of Onlano - Minislry of Municipal Affairs f~ 11 1906200!t13:31 ..... .. . """''''' PIR2005: RiekerinQ C Schedule ZO Asmt Code: 1801 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL POSITION MAli Code: 10102 for the year ended Decembér 31, 2005 2010 Liabilities Temporary loans Currentpurposes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital purposes: Canada. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ontario. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal 2020 2030 2040 2099 2210 2220 2230 2240 2250 2260 2270 2290 2299 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities Canada. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ontario. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Upper·tier. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other municipalities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . School boards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ................................................. Interest on debt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Trade accounts payable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................... . Subtotal 2410 2490 2499 Deferred revenue Obligatory reserve funds (SLC 60 2099 01). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ! Subtotal I 2610 2620 2630 2660 2699 Long tenn liabilities Debt issued. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. [.._ [,.- Debt payable to others. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lease purchase agreements (Tangible capitalleases). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LESS: Debt issued on behalf of Govemment Business Enterprise. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. , Subtotal L Solid Waste Management Facility Liabilities 2799 Solid waste landfill closure and post-closure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Post employment benefits 2810 Accumulated sick leave. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2820 Accrued vacation pay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2830 Accrued pensions payable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2840 Accrued Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB)claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2898 Other ¡H;;ithBe~efiis·&co~;nsatedÆšenc;s· -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2899 Subtotal 9940 TOTAL Liabilities 9945 TOTAL Financial Assets LESS Total Liabilities (Net Financial Assets) 5010 5026 5027 5028 5029 5030 5035 5040 5045 5050 5055 5060 5076 5077 5078 5079 5099 5299 5499 5080 9950 5610 5615 5620 5630 5640 5690 5699 6099 9960 23.238.3661 4.419.939 I 27.658'305 i n '5.~:~l 7.984.000 I ... -1 j -j .1~~4()~J Municipal Position Fund balances Revenue fund General revenue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Special charges and special areas Other : ..-" . --.. Other Other Other Local boards Transit operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Water operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seweroperalions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Libraries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cemeteries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Recreation. community centres and arenas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Business Improvement Area, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other ¡-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other' .......................................... Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. '-,.......................... ,-'.......... .............................,......... . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Revenue fund balance Capital fund balance (SLC 50 5090 01). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reserves and Discretionary reserve funds balance (SLC 60 2099 02 + 03). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity in Government Business Enterprises (SLC 10 6090 01) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOTAL Fund balances LESS: Amounts to be recovered in future years Long term liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Solid waste landfill closure and post-closure liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Postemploymentbenefits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . Interest. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lease purchaseagreements{Tangi~leÇapi~ILeasesL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other !" ............................................ Subtotal Municipal Position TOTAL Liabilities and MunicIpal Position i=~=-"::=~j079,'~ L .... ··=~~20B5.~3n . __._-61.670·¥IJ .·-á6·47t1:2OO ] [=~=.·==_~9,~55.630J , '=-==-.13.5.001.8.33] :J ..; Province of Ontario - Ministry of Municipal Affairs 19.06.2006 13:31 0210 Taxes receivable, beginning of year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 $ 9,490,807 0215 0220 0225 PLUS: Amounts added to tax bills for collection purposes only. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PLUS: Tax amounts levied in the year (SLC 26 9199 03). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PLUS: Current Year Penalties and Interest. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146,471,693 0240 0250 0260 LESS: Total cash collections (SLC 72 0699 09). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LESS: Tax adjustments before allowances (SLC 72 2899 09). . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LESS: Tax adjustments not applied to taxation (SLC 72 4999 09). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145,661,ó49) -1 1.729,66~1 oj 0280 PLUS: ¡ ChargebackslWater Arrears/Mise Chrgs . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . 0290 Taxes receivable, end of year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash Collections 9 $ 0610 0620 0630 0640 0690 0699 Current year's tax. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Previous year's tax. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Penalties and interest. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amounts added to tax bills for collection purposes only. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _. ··_·~__··_~____.,,___·n.___ Other 26,693 145,661,049 5,107,235 1.497,694 . . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . . .... . '" . .. . . . TOTAL Cash Collections CD i~~1 I) 13 co '" 1';1 v Ñ ~ c: CD I~ ( ) ....J E ;:: 1;; I I ,2. 0'0 1-« 1- I CD C> ~ Þ: ò gf æ '" CD ;= .!. ( ) 0. 0. => CD ~ cb C> "" "- g> ò ,...: CD i:ï5 "" -~ I (j) .~ ~t- .!. I ~ v ª1 ~ e: ,Q ¡;; Ci5 g '0 I UJ ....J « 1 I- J 0 I- ( ) '" i§ ::J '" ri 0. co ( ) '" ~ .., u e: !!? I.L U) Q) '" 0 i§ '" ¡r "- ð '" cri' 0. '" Q) "- CD U) ai ....J 0 0 :r: U U) CD V C> Ñ ;!: C> "" ,2 '" '" :a ò ::> co ";- ò :m "" g> UJ 'iã II> ¡¡;- e: Õ GO ¡;; 0 u "" ¿ .:ã c Jl .. ::> ::> .i ~ 5 U) ¿ I- '" 'iã ::> .s e: I!! 5 ~ 0 ~ .S! ê g¡, GO 0 ë. '0 ..CI ~ ',~, .if ~ Q) .I!I g¡, 'I I lõ ;¡;- :a ~ N c m GO l6 'I i :z ~ "" N .,.; ~ 'I ë5 :t CD CD iä ,I i I~ :t -g "" "" ::> '" :t õ ÊI ! Ii '" ¿ « 'ã' c ë5 I!? f ¿ ~ ::> .. Q '0 ei ~ 5 ¿ ¿ J! "" e: ;m C 0 ::> ¡;; .. '" 8" '" ::> "" ~ a:! Q '" 5 CD 5 J!J ~ ~ « "" cri' '" :iJ Q) "" '" "" l- e: .. '" 'E "" ¡i ::> 0 -I (ij J! "" Q) 'E '" ~ Jl ~ ê .s 8 '" §¡ I! c. ,...: Q) E & Q) & e: Q) '" 'ü '" E M 0 e 'E ¿ 0 ,Q ~ iii '" 'E .s "" >- u & ¿ e ~ ¡ I¥ ~i '" '" '" '" ~ .S 0. ::> ::> ë. e: ê 0 " ... ~ c.. ëa e 5 5 c.. 0 0 '~I CD :E fJ 3: 0. Q) .9 .if "" .!!! "" Õ 0 "f;? ëa '" '" .& e: ~ .~ c ,g¡ '8 ë. ri e: ....J Q) ,!!! ,g¡ '" 8 Õ UI 0 8 .if '" « E 'e: 'E 'e: ,g¡ .~ ~ "" .., '" > 1;; '" :z ~I i u !:2. '0 ¿ e: E ::> '" -0 Q) '" ~ .. ~ U) .I!I « ::> g '0 .., & :r: -0 .I!I E c :t .2 5 .!!! 8 .E U .e & z c ~ __J .S! 'õ ê 0, 0 .. ~ .9 .9 .e '" .. ~ 'E ~ ëa ~ ¥ e: ~ ..5 è:' Q) 0. e: '" '" :ß => ,Q oj ,g¡ 0. 'iã Q) E ::> '" * ,g¡ 'E Õ 'jjj 8 ..§ > Q) 0 ::> ,:; ~ U U '" Ci5 '" ~ :;; ::> ffi æ c ~ ~ 'c 'ã' '" ~ ~ -0 -0 -0 ~ Æ :; ~ ~ ~ ã; :; :; 0 C1J « ~ & & & õ ;e e: c: J! ë5 l- I- 0 J! I- Z 0 0 ... UJ 0 ~ 'õ ( ) '" '" '" '" c::> c::> '" g:¡ '" '" g C;; en c::> C> c::> g C;; i c::> c::> u C '" '" §: '" ~ '" '" '" ~ ~ ¡¡¡! N '" ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ !;!:? !;!:? c::> '" co co ::J ~ ~ 'S; '" '" '" '" '" V "- e Q. (~ 1 v 1. Debt burden ofthe municipality 0210 0220 0230 0299 All outstanding debt issued by the municipality, predecessor municipalities artd consolidated entities To Ontario and agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . To Canada and agencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . To Others. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal 1 $ 0499 PLUS: All debt assumed by the municipality from others. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . LESS: All debt assumed by others Ontario. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . School boards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Municipalities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Govemment Business Enterprises. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0610 0620 0630 0640 0699 Subtotal ° LESS: Ontario Clean Water Agency (OCWA) debt retirement funds 0810 Sewer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . 0820 Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0899 Subtotal LESS: Own sinking funds (Actual balances) 1010 General municipal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1020 Enterprises and others. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1099 Subtotal 9910 TOTAL Debt burden of the municipality .---.-----..-"----. "".--"-- -_..._"-,._.--._.~.__.._~-----'"-~---_._~._--,-.- -.~,.._-~-~..-----,---...-,,-- 1210 1220 1230 1240 1250 1260 1270 1280 1298 9920 2. Debt burden of the municipality: Analysed by debt instrument Sinking fund debentures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Installment (serial) debentures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long term bank loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lease purchase agreements (Tangible capital/eases). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mortgages. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ontario Clean Water Agency (OCWA). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long term reserve fund loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Construction Financing ºebentures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOTAL Debt burden of the municipality 13,540,430 3. Debt burden of the municipality: Anatysed by furtction 1405 1410 General government. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Protection services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transportation services: Roadways. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Environmental services: Sanitary sewer system. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Storm sewer system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Waterworks system. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Waste collection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Waste disposal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Health services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Social and family services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Social housing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Recreation and cultural services: Parks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Recreation facilities - Golf Course, Marina, Ski Hill. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Recreation facilities - Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Libraries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Planning and development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long term liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOTAL Debt burden of the municipality 1,269,'804] j 3,473,819 I ,.. I 1.171,7221 I .. ___ji - ....-- 13,540,43D. J 203,663) 1,807~574 ! 1415 1420 5,291,214 ] I 1425 1430 1435 1440 1445 1450 1455 1460 1465 1471 1474 1475 1480 1490 9930 Province of Ontario - Ministry of Municipal Affairs ('1 ,... 19.06.2006 134 J ZOO!'",.Wf EIR20DS: Pickering C Scnedule 7~ Asmt Code: 1801 l[eNG TERM I[IABfI[lTIES AND CeMMITMENTS MAH Code: 10'102 for tlie year ended December 31. 2005 4. Debt payable in foreign currencies (net of sinking fund holdings) 1610 1620 1630 1640 1650 1660 5. 1810 1820 1830 US Dollars: Canadian dollar equivalent included in SLC 74 9910 01. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Par value in 'U.S. Dollars'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other currency: Canadian dollar equivalent included in SLC 74 9910 01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Par value in . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canadian dollar.~quiv~le~tincl~~ed i"-~~~~?~9~_19~1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Par value in . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 $ .. .-. -~ -~-~_..._,._--,-_._._~ _~_·~'_n_.·_...~___ "._ __ __ ...~__._._~__ - n_ __._.___~._____..__ Interest earned on sinking funds and on debt retirement funds during the year Own funds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ontario Clean Water Agency Sewer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Water. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -~-"'--'--'-"-"---'----""---------'-"----'~'------M~____~~_____ __ __ --~'_"'_'_""_~_"'_"'____'___'m~~ 6. Details of sinking fund balance 2010 Value of own sinking fund debentures issued and outstanding at year end. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance of own sinking funds at year end 2110 Total contributions to own sinking funds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . 2120 Total income earned from investments of sinking funds' monies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2199 Subtotal 2210 Estimated total future contributions from this municipality required to meet obligations in line 2010 above. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2220 Estimated total future income earned from investments in lines 2199 and 2210 above. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . 7. Long term commitments at year end 2410 Hospital support. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2420 University support. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2430 Leases and other agreements. . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2440 Capital equipment,landa(;( ui~tio~:.:~,-,-_._,-... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2496 Other . .. . .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. . .. .. 2497 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2498 Other . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. 2499 TOTAL (', ~ v 8. Contingent liabilities 2610 Pending or threatened litigation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2620 Retroactive wage seWements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2630 Guarantees of long term indebtedness in the name of the municipality but assumed by others. . . . 2640 Outstanding loans guaranteed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2698 Other ' .. . .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. 2699 TOTAL 9. Ontario Clean Water Agency Provincial Projects Water projects: 2810 For this Municipality only. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2820 Share of integrated project(s). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sewer projects: 2830 For this Municipality only. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2840 Share of integrated project(s). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. ..---.. .-. - ^..--- -~.----------~_.__..._._--_._~..---_.-- ,.....---...---.---.-- ----_._-~--_._.- 10. Debt Charges for the current year Recovered from the consolidated revenue fund 3012 General Tax Rates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . 3014 Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3020 Recovered from reserve funds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Recovered from unconsolidated entities: 3030 Electricity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3040 Gas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3050 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3097 Other .. .. " .. .. .. . .. . .. .. . .. . .. .. 3098 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3099 TOTAL Line 3099 includes: Lump sum (balloon) repayments of long term debt. . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3110 3140 3150 3199 Analysis of Lease Purchase Agreements (Tangible Capital Leases) and Financing Leases Debt charges for Lease purchase agreements (Tangible capital leases) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financing leases (not Tangible capital leases) beyond term of Council. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOTAL 11. Long term debt refinanced 3410 Repayment of Provincial Special Assistance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3420 Other long term debt refinanced. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YorN [ACCUmulated Deficit 1 $ Principal 1 $ 1.682,208 235,517 1,917,725 235,517 Principal 1 $ Total Outstanding Capital Obligation 2 $ 2 $ Debt Charges 3 $ - - .. ._-----_.--.~-_.._.~--- Interest 2 $ o o Interest 2 $ 12. Future principal and Interest payments on EXISTING debt 3210 Year 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . 3220 Year 2007. . . . . . . . . . . . 3230 Year 2008. . . . . . . . . . . . 3240 Year 2009. . . . . . . . . . . . 3250 Year 2010. . . . . . . . . . . . 3260 Years 2011to 2015. . . . . . . 3270 Years 2016 onwards. . . . . . 3280 Int. to be earned on sink. funds. 3290 Downtown Revita!. Prograrn. . . 3299 TOTAL 13. Other notes 13,540,430 2,618,496 RECOVERABLE FROM: All Others Principal 7 $ Unconsolidated Entities Principal Interest 5 6 $ $ Reserve Funds Principal 3 $ Interest 8 $ o o o o o .'.m__..__ m___.____________...___ Please list all Other Notes and forward supporting schedules as required by email to: FIR@mah.aov.on.ca 3601 * Use AL T + ENTER Keys to 'Return' to the next line. 1. Municipal workforce profile Employees of the Municipality 0205 Administration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0210 Fire. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0215 Police. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0220 Transit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0225 Public Works. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0230 Health Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0235 Homes for the Aged. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0240 Other Social Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0245 Parks and Recreation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0250 Libraries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0255 Planning. . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0290 Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0298 Subtotal 0300 Proportion of Munic. Empl. covered by 'Collective Agreements' (%). . . Employees of Joint Local Boards Administration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fire. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Police. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transit. . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Public Works. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Health Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Homes for the Aged. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Social Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Parks and Recreation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Libraries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Planning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal 0305 0310 0315 0320 0325 0330 0335 0340 0345 0350 0355 0390 0398 0399 TOTAL 2. Selected investments of own sinking funds as at Dec. 31 0610 Own sinking funds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Municipal procurement this year 1010 1020 Total construction contracts awarded. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Construction contracts awarded at $100,000 or greater. . . . . . . . . . 4. Building permit information 1210 1220 1230 1299 Residential properties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Multi-Residential properties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , All other property classes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subtotal 5. Insured value of physical assets 1410 Buildings.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1420 Machinery and equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1498 OtherÄ~¡o----- ----'J . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1499 Subtotal 6. Total Dollar Losses due to Structural Fires 1510 Losses due to structural fires, averaged over 3 yrs (2003 . 2005). . . . . Positions 1 # Positions 2 # 3 # 7.00 95.00 45.00 6.00 63.00 76.00 189.00 32.00 77.00 37.00 1.00 64.00 11.00 127.002 343.00 170.00 195.00 879,773 77% 45% 100% 82.00 63.00 239,526 Own Municipality 1 $ Provincial Federal 3 4 $ Number of Contracts Value of Contracts 1 # 2 15 9 ~:iói::~1 Total Value of Building i Square metres of New Permits Construction 2 3 Number of Building Permits I 1 I # I 423[ 01 187 i ____j 610 j m' 40,131,400! 38,886 O! 01 37,153,900 f -34,43~ I 77,285,300 ¡ 73,32!1 1 Square Foot = 0.0929 m' 1 $ , u_ I 110,028,200 ! 17,38ÙOO I --I 9,069.869 i I 136,482.569 1 1 $ I _ ._____u~~~~~J Province of Ontario - Ministry of Municipal Affairs ':.{ 1 () v. \'1 19062006 13'31 .. . =."" E'IR2005: Pickering e Sehedule 80 Asmt Code; 1801 STATISTICAL INFORMATION MAR Code: 10102 for the year ended December 31, 2005 7. Alternate service delivery arrangements Municipal services which the municipality currently provides through some form of alternate service delivery: (Top 10 by Rev. Fund Expenditures) 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 ! Municipal service S40 Functional Heading 3 LIST I Protective inspection and control : Protective inspection and control i ¡PAW Animal Control ! Crossing Guard Service 0440 0440 Rev. Fund Expenditure 4 $ Comments 5 298,141 287,212 () I) (\ V i.p.r~nce of Ontario - Ministry of MUnicipal Affairs 19.06.2006 13:31 :xJI:}5.\'1'1 BIR2D05: Rickering ~ Schedule 80 Asmt Code: 1801 STATISTICAL INFORMAtiON MAH Code: 10102 for the year ended December 31,2005 8. Consolidated Local boards including Joint local boards and all local entitles set up by the municipality (I) PROPORTIONALLY CONSOLIDATED joint local boards Name of Board or Entity Board Proportion ofT otal Municipality's Share of Municipality's Share of Board Description Code Total Contributions Total Fee Revenues 3 2 4 5 6 LIST % $ Board 4,293,643 0801 0802 0803 0804 0805 0806 0807 0808 0809 0810 0811 0812 0813 0814 0815 0816 0817 0818 0819 0820 0821 0822 0823 0824 0825 0826 0827 0828 0829 0830 0831 0832 0833 0834 0835 0836 0837 0838 0839 0840 0841 0842 0843 0844 0845 0846 0847 0848 0849 Transit Authority Province of Ontario - Ministry of Municipal Affairs ,).) 1 19.06.2006""3~ . . 20Q5Not FIR2005: PicKering e Scheêh.lle 80 A'smtCode: 1801 STATISTICAL..INFÐRMATIÐN MAH Code: 10102 for the year ended Decem ber 31, 2005 0851 0852 0853 0854 0855 0856 0857 0858 0859 0860 0861 0862 0863 0864 0865 0866 0867 0868 0869 0870 0871 0872 0873 0874 0875 0876 0877 0878 0879 0880 0881 0882 0883 0884 0885 0886 0887 0888 0889 0890 0891 0892 0893 0894 0895 0896 0897 0898 0899 (II) FULLY CONSOLIDATED local boards and any local entities set up by the municipality Name of Board or Entity Public Library Board Board Description Board Code 3 2 LIST Board 1604 CiÚ¡ ,,~ (~ ') () V I", L.. June 26, 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION At the June 19, 2006 meeting of Council, Councillors Dickerson and Brenner gave notice that they would at this or a subsequent meeting of Council present the following Notice of Motion: 1. Innovative Speed Enforcement of Pickerinq Streets Moved by Councillor Dickerson Seconded by Councillor Brenner Whereas the issue of speeding vehicles and street safety within the City of Pickering has been, currently is, and will continue to be amongst the top issues with the residents of Pickering and ranks within the top three issues of resident complaints to Members of Council; and Whereas there have been, and continue to be, many efforts aimed at drivers to reduce their speed to the posted speed limits ie: Road Watch volunteers setting up and manning radar boards to advise motorists of just how fast they are traveling; and Whereas, in spite of all the efforts of citizens and police alike there continues to be many drivers who flaunt the speed limit defying the police to catch them; and Whereas, Durham Regional Police Services (DRPS) lack the resources to provide a dedicated Traffic Division for Pickering; and Whereas, each year communities seek out options that results in thousands of taxpayer dollars budgeted to advertise and install new "STOP" signs where technical data may, or may not, support their installation but where clearly the local residents agree, as a last resort, to insist upon installation; and Whereas, the Council of the City of Pickering, like most residents, is committed to doing all that it possibly may do to make our streets and sidewalks safe for all to walk, run, bike or otherwise travel upon; f) 2"") v.., ,J Whereas, this Council, as Councils past, has taken bold and innovative action when it has exhausted all options to resolve a conflict which speaks to the quality of life all residents expect and deserve; Now be it therefore resolved, that the Council of the City of Pickering request, through the Office of the CAO, an assessment which would compare various options which may be available including, but not limited to: 1) entering into a service agreement with DRPS to supply two officers on a "pay-duty" basis; 2) entering into a service agreement based on actual cost plus benefits for two officers; and Be it further resolved, that it is expected that the service agreement would provide for the City to specify hours of required service and locations for speed enforcement; and Be it further resolved, that all Provincial Offences Revenue realized through this service agreement be returned to the City of Pickering resulting from said traffic enforcement within the City; and Be it lastly resolved, that it is understood moving forward with a service agreement would not lessen existing levels of Police Services, but if required, would result in the hiring of two additional police officers. CiÚ¡ 0# BY -LAWS 6682/06 6683/06 6684/06 a24 June 26,2006 Being a By-law to dedicate and name certain parts of lots within Registrar's Compiled Plan 1051, being those parts of Lots 48, 49, 50, 51 52, 53, 54, 117 and 118, designated as Parts 16 to 20, 40R-23842, Parts 1 and 2, 40R-23817, Parts 1 and 2, 40R-22516, Part 6, 40R- 21832, Part 9, 40R-21831, Block 29, Plan 40M-2299 as Goldenridge Road and Block 30, Plan 40M-2299 as Rushton Road. [Refer to page 33] Being a By-law to stop-up and close as public highway, those parts of Goldenridge Road being Parts 10, 11, 21 and 22, Plan 40R-21831 and Parts 7,9, 15 and 16, Plan 40R-21832, reserving easements over Parts 15, 16, 21 and 22 for storm drainage purposes and to abandon easements, in favour of the City, for road maintenance purposes, authorizing the sale of the lands and the conveyance of easements to the abutting owners. [Refer to page 34] Being a By-law to exempt Block 1, Plan 40M- , Pickering, from the part lot control provisions of the Planning Act. [By-law attached) This by-law will be registered immediately following the registration of the M-Plan and Subdivision Agreement for the project 3·· I) r.' r:. . ) THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING BY-LAW NO. 6684/06 IJI?AFT Being a By-law to exempt Block 1, Plan 40M- , Pickering, from the part lot control provisions of the Planning Act. WHEREAS the owner of Block 1, Plan 40M- register a common elements condominium plan; , intends to obtain approval of and AND WHEREAS the proposed common elements condominium plan is to consist of 18 residential units; AND WHEREAS it is intended that the owner or owners of each of the 18 dwelling units will own the potl on which his, her or their dwelling is located in fee simple, and will also be a member or members of the common elements condominium corporation; AND WHEREAS it is intended that the potls on which the 18 dwellings are to be constructed will be subdivided by means of an exemption from the part lot control provisions of the Planning Act, R S. O. 1990, chapter P. 13; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. Section 50(5) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13, shall cease to apply to Block 1, Plan 40M- upon: (a) registration of this By-law in the Land Registry Office for the Land Titles Division of Durham (No. 40); and (b) registration of a restriction, pursuant to Section 118 of the Land Titles Act, RS.O. 1990, chapter L.5, requiring the consent of the Solicitor for The Corporation of the City of Pickering to the registration of any transfer or charge of Block 1, Plan 40M- or any part or parts thereof in the Land Registry Office for the Land Titles Division of Durham (No. 40). 2. This By-law shall remain in force and effect from the date of the passing of this By-law and shall expire on December 31, 2007. BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 26th day of June, 2006. David Ryan, Mayor Debi A. Bentley, City Clerk = _1/ l:::í -- T - ð I II - - I § FIDDLERS = HOOVER DRIVE ~ - 0 f .:=~ ( /\ := ~ h '::::: ~\ \ I ~ == TOMl/1\ ON CRT D ""'i. 3 ¡«. ¡= ~ «' ~~ OLYN 'L..-Jt;j (c... / I - J- g ~~ Ì'.. Q. STREET < ~I~ ~ )- I 1//1' 61'\"- r--- \ ~~ ~ ~<').'0"' DRIVE ~ » ~ ~. ~ rf'~'b \ -Sd - - ~ --, '1 "- :== r;¿ VALLEY GATE ---.J BROOKRIDGE c;~:<:.'t. '" 1--- I ~ 11\\ '\.. \ \-- - %¿., )-- \ - «' I-- I---.,\.-- w - r-- 9p~~ <i - h-.-r- ___ %\ ~~ 'ill I __~ ~\iI;::~ ~'BWEI~T ~;o"o n ~ P )Oþ1:fiTYJ ~OÑ ~- W r v- ~-'- _;1 /' ~---- /"" r ~~ ........- ~ --- V,,- vt:!- , ~ v ,y/ D' '[J@oo:Ifi]'[J@ ! ~ ~ ~'-- I / ~ì~- ~ \c;'(\~¡..-{ / \ -, FRONTIER ~ == '~ "~fT1 1T ",cR rt ) ~~ ~ u i ~~~ g;~ ~ ~ - ~,. ~ City of Pickering Planning & Development Department ~ ~.... ZUlJ ~ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PLAN 228, PART LOT 1 AND 2 OWNER ROSEVALLEY HOMES FILE No. S 10/04 FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY PN·5 PA· 328 I ))1 \ ~ / '/ ~ ~ '( .~ \ '\ ~ I I §( \\ _ ROUGE HILL ~ "- ---1 I \ I w > ~ o I I I J- Z ~ o ::< w o ~ o e:: I DATE DEC. 7, 2004 DRAWN BY JB SCALE 1 :5000 CHECKED BY TB l' Item / Ref # C¿ú¡ ,,~ Minutes Wateñront Coordinating Committee Thursday, May 25, 2006 7:00 PM Main Committee Meeting Room Attendees: Councillor Maurice Brenner (Chair) Doris Chee Jim Dike David Steele Chris Walker Birgit Wilson (Recording Secretary) Absent: Craig Bamford Michael Bellmore Larry Field Chandra Gocool David Stone Kevin Tower Details & Discussion & Conclusion (summary of discussion) Action Items I Status (include deadline as a ro riate) Welcome Councillor Brenner welcomed Chris Walker as the representative of Ontario Power Generation. Ado Moved by Councillor Brenner Minutes from April 27, 2006 were adopted. CARRIED Discussion Related to Minutes David Steele formally objected to the lack of action being taken by the City of Pickering in regard to Waterfront issues. He stated that various projects and or action plans are recorded in the minutes, however, no further action is taken. He also stated that the agenda of other related Committees are more likely to be prioritized. In his opinion there is no serious commitment by the Cit of Pickerin to prioritize this Committee's decisions. He 1 further objected that the original intent of the Waterfront Committee was not being carried out. David Steele and Jim Dike agreed that each project should have a Business Plan attached in order to have funding and time lines documented. David Steele also commented that he is a member of the Steering Committee for the Frenchman's Bay Study and yet he was not notified of the meeting and requested a copy of the minutes. Councillor Brenner agreed that there is a disconnect between the Committees. He further stated that the Technical Committee should report on the status of projects outlined in the Strategic Pan. Invited guest, Ian McCullough, from Marshall Homes gave an overview of the East Spit project, in particular the proposed Windmill. Mr. McCullough stated that a working Windmill is being built which would provide power to the Hough's Marina only. Marshall Homes is cleaning up the East Spit (Hough's property) that will see this portion of the Waterfront being utilized for additional social activities, i.e. weddings and large gatherings, associated with the Marina's restaurant. A question and answer period ensued with regard to the clean up of the East Spit. Mr. McCullough further explained what type of equipment would be used in for this project. Moved by David Steele 1. That the Waterfront Coordinating Committee recommended to the City, the following for consideration: a) That due to the equipment scheduled to be in place, the City of Pickering share the cost with Marshall Homes and utilize the equipment to; (i) clean up the rest of the spit; (ii) cut the remaining Waterfront Trail; and (iii) perform remedial work at the eastern portion. CARRIED Doris Chee to provide David Steele with a copy of the minutes. 2 David Steele thanked Mr. McCullough for his presentation and complimented Marshall Homes on the plans for the East Spit. Waterfront Trail Siqnaqe · Doris Chee reported Trailhead Signs quotations to close on Monday, May 29,2006. · Doris Chee provided mock-up signs for the Committee to view. · Dates for suggested unveiling events are as follows: o Saturday, July 22, 2006 Peak Trail at Frisco Road o Saturday. Auqust 12. 2006 Peak & Monarch Trails at Millennium Square o Saturday. Auqust 26. 2006 Monarch & First Nations Trails at Rotary Frenchman's Bay Park West · First Nations Trails at Western Gateway to be installed in 2007. · Dates are achievable, however, concern was raised whether or not the July 22, 2006 unveiling would be well attended by the public, due to the geographic location of this Trailhead. After some discussion it was agreed that unveiling ceremonies will only take place at Millennium Square on Saturday, August 12, 2006 and the Monarch & First Nations Trails at Rotary Frenchman's Bay West Park, on Saturday, August 26,2006. · Formal unveiling / speeches to take place 11 :00 am - 1 :00 pm. · Peak Trail at Frisco Road - signage will be erected July 22, 2006, however, no unveiling ceremonies will take place. · Stephen Reynolds, Division Head, Culture & Recreation to provide staff for each unveiling event. · Jim Dike, David Steele, David Stone and Chris Walker to finalize sponsorship. · Chris Walker to obtain cost of hiring a service to do the actual BBQ. If cost is reasonable - this would be OPG sponsorsh ip. · John Sabean to put together all materials/handouts, etc. for each station. Doris Chee to confirm with S. Reynolds that staff will be available. Chris Walker to obtain quote for next meeting. Jim Dike to follow- up with John Sabean. 3 Park Benches As David Stone could not attend this meeting, therefore, his report/update was referred to the next meeting. June 22, 2006 7:00 p.m. The meeting adjourned at 8:30 pm. 4 C¿ú¡ ,,~ Minutes I Meeting Summary Statutory Public Information Meeting Council Chambers Thursday, June 1, 2006 7:05 pm. PRESENT: Councillor Ashe - Chair Councillor McLean Councillor Dickerson Councillor Pickles Councillor Brenner (8:30 pm) STAFF: Ross Pym Neil Carroll Birgit Wilson - - Principal Planner, Development Review - Director, Planning & Development - Recording Secretary GUEST: - Stephen I. F agyas - Lead Consultant for S.R. & R. Bay Ridges Ltd. Councillor Ashe provided a brief explanation of the purpose of the meeting and introduced staff. Ross Pym, Principal Planner, Development Review, provided an overview of the requirements of the Planning Act and the Ontario Municipal Board respecting this meeting and matters under consideration there at. ZONING BY-LAW A N S.R. & R. BAY RIDGES LTD. 1215 -1235 BAYLY STREET PART OF BLOCK Y, PLAN M-16 CITY OF PICKERING 1. Planner Comments Ross Pym, Principal Planner, Development Review, provided an overview of the property location, applicant's proposal and City's Official Plan policies pertaining to this site, as outlined in Information Report No. 07-06. He confirmed that the subject application did not include the lands associated with the smaller plaza at 1259 Bayly Street. Page 1 CORP0228-2/02 2. Applicants Comments Stephen I. Fagyas, Lead Consultant for S.R. & R. Bay Ridges Ltd. provided an overview of the proposed development using a PowerPoint presentation. Mr. Fagyas stated that this presentation will be made available to the public on their website. He further stated that this proposal has a high level of sustainability and they had conducted a comprehensive planning analysis, considered all the possible impacts and concluded the application complies with all relevant policies. He concluded his presentation by introducing the architect and landscape personnel who worked on the design of this proposal. 3. Comments from Members of the Public Robert & Marlene Gardner 1890 Vallev Farm Rd.. Mr. & Mrs. Gardner purchased a unit on Radom Street for their physically challenged son 3 weeks ago. Mrs. Gardner stated that the prime reason for purchasing in the area was that their son could have safe access to essential services, i.e. grocery store, pharmacy, dry cleaners. She asked the Chair why potential homeowners were not informed of this proposal. Mr. & Mrs. Gardner also stated that this proposal lacked consideration for all seniors living in this area as their essential services would be taken away and that the increased density of the area would cause major traffic problems, making this a very unsafe area for pedestrians. Jim Dobney Radom Street. Mr. Dobney expressed concern about the boutique style stores that are proposed for the area, should the re-zoning be accepted. He stated these stores would not reflect the fact that senior citizens are on a fixed income and need to have access to stores, and services that reflect price points for their limited income. Ed Fulton 705-1210 Radom Street. Mr. Fulton objected to statements made that the Price Chopper store was in financial difficulty. He noted that this statement was made by a 17 year old employee of the store and that no one in management would have discussed serious financial matters with this employee. He disagreed with the statements made. Letitia Wise 31-1230 Radom Sf. Ms. Wise expressed concerns with the parking spaces in the proposal. She noted that the proposal allowed for 532 spaces, however, there would be 582 units.. She also had concerns that essential services, i.e. grocery store, pharmacy, dry cleaners, would no longer be available to seniors and that the proposed "little shops" would be too expensive for people on a fixed income. Also, that the proposed towers are too Page 2 CORP0228-2/02 high for this neighbourhood. She stated her objection to the fact that traffic lights being proposed. Doris Hopper 204-1210 Radom Street Ms. Hopper stated that the community did not agree with any of the proposed plans and that the plaza should not be torn down as it is a fully sustainable plaza. She further expressed concern that the proposed 16-18 storey condominium/apartment complex as this conflicts with the city's own zoning guidelines. She stated that these lands are the gateway to the beautiful waterfront of Pickering, and it should be developed to attract tourism. She asked the City Planners, Councillors and the Mayor to have a vision that promotes development of cultural components for this area, looking at the example of the GTA. She proposed that instead of another townhouse, condominium complex the city partners with private, corporate sponsorship to build a Concert Hall, Museum or Theatre. She concluded that any plans which displaces current storeowners should include fair compensation, which to date has not been addressed. Paul Crawford 867 Antonio Sf. Mr. Crawford noted the Official Plan is Mixed Corridor, therefore there needs to be a mix of uses and the need for jobs. Does not support the application as the area is a stable neighbourhood. His opinion the application does not comply with the Region or City Official Plan. Carmen Montgomery 239 Lupin Drive She is also concerned with losing the essential services the plaza now provides and that no fair compensation has been offered to the business owners to vacate their current leases if the plaza is torn down. She spoke of the environmental issues with this proposal. She stated that the proposed high-rise building contravenes the current height restrictions of the area. The high density will require more ambulances, police, etc., and this cost will not be incurred by S.R.& R. Bay Ridges Ltd., rather the taxpayers. She stated that the traffic study, which Mr. Fagyas reported on, was not correct and that if traffic patterns are observed at 5:00 pm instead of 6:30 pm the conclusion will be a lot different. Lastly, she reiterated that the residents of this area are vehemently opposed to this proposal and the city should listen and look for a more sustainable plan for the residents/taxpayers of the Bay Ridges area. Tim Dobson 1310 Broadview Street Mr. Dobson is the President of the Pickering East Short Community Association (PESCA). He represented the membership at the meeting and voiced the following concerns for this proposal: . PESCA should have been properly informed Le.: a formal presentation. Only a Page 3 CORP0228-2/02 brief mention was made at a general meeting. The Councillor provided little or no information. · April 2006 members of PESCA voiced strong objections to proposal. · Any re-zoning requires extensive public meetings, one meeting is not enough. · Traffic concerns - more congestion to the surrounding area - unsafe for children, seniors. · Estimates 250% more traffic in the area. · Object to proposed building heights-no taller than 5 storeys. · Proposed parking spaces are not enough. · Negative waterfront enjoyment. · Environmental impact needs to be addressed. · Health and safety issues. · Demolition of phase 1 - how will this impact tenants/store owners who will remain during this phase. · New retail spaces are at risk. · No Emergency Evacuation Plan has been put forward. · PESCA is not opposed to the Bay Ridges area development, however, much more discussion, alternative proposals, and consultation with all concerned must take place. Mr. & Mrs. Rozenfals 816 Helen Crescent Mrs. & Mrs. Rozenfals questioned why the developer was only interested in building residential units. They stated the need for the growth of local business development and commercial space. Pasquale Malandrino Chique Hairstylinq, 1215-1235 Bayly St. Unit 450 Mr. Malandrino explained the difficulties that are being encountered by the plaza business people when trying to contact S.R & R. Bay Ridges Ltd. First a wrong telephone number was printed on a flyer and then when the correct number was obtained, messages are not returned. He stated there is a high level of frustration among the business owners, as there seems to be no accountability by the developer to tenants or the public for their safety or any financial restitution being offered to vacate leases early. He concluded by stating that negotiations must take place and that business owners must receive compensation for vacating their leases early. Eillen Higdon 852 Fairview Ave.. Ms. Higdon is opposed to this development. She is concerned that not enough in- depth studies have been done to sustain this development. In particular she is not happy with the environmental impact, traffic impact. She concluded by stating that tenants must be dealt with fairly if they are being asked to vacate their leases early. She feels more clarification on the lease issue is required and that to date the approach b the developer in this area has been "draconian". Page 4 CORP0228-2/02 Dave Mathews 714 Annlands Street He also opposes this development. He cited environmental issues as well as traffic issues. When the existing tower on Radom Street was built it was recognized as a mistake and should not be repeated. He further stated that the citizens of this area would not let this project happen without a fight. John Blue 4730 Thornton Road Mr. Blue stated that they own and operate a Laundromat and Car Wash business. Over the past 10 years they have been able to grow their businesses significantly and wonder why S. R. & R. Bay Ridges Ltd. has not been able to sustain the plaza. Their issue with this development is also the lack of negotiations and fair compensation for vacating their lease. Ken Devine 1210 Radom Street, Apt. 506 Mr. Devine stated that the Bay Ridges area does not need more residential units but rather affordable shopping for seniors south of the 401. He noted that a Hasty Market grocery store is not affordable for people on a fixed income. Jacqueline Smart 829 Fairview Ave. Ms. Smart made the following comments in stating his objections to this development: · Price Choppers did not want to close; however their rent increased 85%. · Traffic lights on St. Martins Drive are required. · The entire traffic flow in this area needs to be studied further. · What is the timeframe for Phase 1, 2, & 3; 5 years apart? · Not enough parking spaces are allotted to each unit at present. · Even though this plan is in accordance with the Durham Region Plan, it is not acceptable to the residents of this area. · The proposed high-rise units should be limited to 5 storeys. · Will there be more medical services provided to sustain the increased population, Le.: doctors. See concluded that all opposition to this project should be directed in writing to the Ministry of the Environment, The Region of Durham and their elected officials. Carolyn Huston 898 Antonio Street She stated her objections to the fact that in both the Durham Regional and Pickering Official Plan there was no projection of the population growth for this project. Page 5 CORP0228-2/02 Bonnie Littley 1499 Sandhurst Crescent She is with the Ontario Smart Growth Network. She stated that this proposal had merit, the Site Plan looks good, but not for the Bay Ridges area. The Site Plan shows no schools, sidewalks, only driveways, and the proposed playground/parkette is extremely small. She concluded by stating that more than one meeting needs to take place to find a more suitable solution to re-building the Bay Ridges area. Bianca D'Souza 1117 Tanzer Court She stated her opposition to this proposal, as she is concerned for the safety of the children in this area. She fears that Radom Street will become a speedway if no traffic lights are installed. Pedro Gonzales 875 Cha/Jleau Drive Mr. Gonzales shares the concern of the previous resident and in addition questions whether there is a budget for more schools, police and medical facilities to sustain the increase in population. He also stated that if there is a nuclear accident, the limited exit routes from this area would cause a bottleneck, thus prohibiting speedy evacuation. Tom Rock 961 Mount Castle Crescent Mr. Rock is concerned that there are too many grey areas with this development. He feels there is non-compliance with regard to the wetlands. He also noted his disappointment with the public information process as he feels the public are not given all the facts. He also stated that the applicant/developer is not listening to the community and questions whether the development will actually be built as proposed or will there be changes made along the way without notifying the public, once the developer has all the approvals. Lastly, he stated that there should be height restrictions on any highrise proposal for this area. Mark Willis 1866 Fair/Jort Mr. Willis owns the dance studio in the plaza and is now the largest tenant. Initially had many concerns with the application, however have had very professional discussions with the new owners and feel he has been treated fairly. Paul A vis 931 Livemool Rd. Mr. Avis stated that to date the OMB has turned down all appeals of this nature. He suggested that the best solution is for the City of Pickering to negotiate with developers for the best, most suitable development that addresses all the concerns by residents thus far. Lastly, he noted that written comments against this proposal are the best wa to et action. Page 6 CORP0228-2/02 Angelina Moore 1235 Random Street She stated that if this development goes through, the schools in the area would be overpopulated. The student/teacher ratio will result in teachers being over worked. She also expressed concern with the increased traffic for the area and that the parking on Radom Street will also become an issue. Christopher Dean 1155 Tanzer Court Mr. Dean questioned the accuracy of the Traffic Impact Study, as he believes that this development will cause major traffic problems, increased street parking and generally unsafe conditions for pedestrians. Abdul Prenji 1011 Sherman Street Mr. Prenji stated that he is the owner of the local Pharmacy and wanted to express thanks to all the residents of the area for their support by coming to this meeting. 4. Response from Applicant Mr. Fagyas encouraged the public to visit their website in order to view the PowerPoint presentation of this project. He stated that all technical documents are available for review and that this application complies with all the required elements. He also explained that the Plaza is financial difficulty and will be torn down. Lastly he stated that the application is for a zoning change and this is the right of the owners. 5. Staff Response Ross Pym, Principal Planner, Development Review, stated that there is some misinformation in regard to this application and encouraged all interested parties to come to the Planning & Development Department at the City Hall to look over all the documentation that is available. An example of the misinformation is the parking spaces being provided on the site and many people have been referring to the wrong number of total spaces available. 6. Comments from the Chair Councillor Ashe advised that the Planning and Development Staff would be available for a short eriod of time after the meetin for an one who wished to s eak with them. The meeting adjourned at 10:30 pm Page 7 CORP0228-2/02