HomeMy WebLinkAboutMay 26, 2006
Executive Committee Meeting
Agenda
Tuesday, May 23, 2006
7:30 pm
Council Chambers
Chair: Councillor Ashe
NO PRE-MEETING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED
(I) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES
1. Director, Planning & Development, Report PO 32-06 1-5
Request for Council's Permission to Create Lots by Land Severance
B. and M. Cillo
Lot 8, Plan M90
(719 Simpson Avenue)
City of Pickerinq
That the request made by Leo Perciasepe of Almont Homes Inc., on behalf of the
owners B. and M. Cillo, be approved, to permit the division of lands (being Lot 8,
Plan M90 [municipally known as 719 Simpson Avenue]) by land severance rather
than by draft plan of subdivision for future residential development.
2.
Director, Planning & Development, Report PO 33-06
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 1/06
1678445 Ontario Ltd.
1630 - 1634 Bayly Street
South Part of Lot 19, Concession 1
City of Pickerinq
6-25
1. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 1/06 be approved, to amend
the existing zoning on the subject property to add a body-rub parlour as a
permitted use on lands being South Part of Lot 19, Concession 1, City of
Pickering; and
2. That the amending zoning by-law to implement Zoning By-law
Amendment Application A 1/06, as set out in Appendix I to Report PO 33-06,
be forwarded to City Council for enactment.
3.
Director, Planning & Development, Report PO 34-06
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 17/05
Lakeland Associates Ltd. on behalf of Christine Ward
3325 Highway 7, Hamlet of Kinsale
(North Part of Lot 2, Concession 5)
City of Pickerinq
26-51
Executive Committee Meeting
Agenda
Tuesday, May 23, 2006
7:30 pm
Council Chambers
Chair: Councillor Ashe
That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 17/05, submitted by Lakeland
Associates Ltd. on behalf of Christine Ward, to permit a dog daycare and
boarding facility with associated retailing, on lands being North Part of Lot 2,
Concession 5, City of Pickering, be approved as a temporary use for a period of
three years, subject to conditions outlined in Appendix I to Report PO 34-06.
4.
Director, Operations & Emergency Services, Report OES 23-06
Traffic concerns - Rouqemount Drive (south of Toynevale Road)
52-55
1. That Report OES 23-06 regarding traffic operational concerns on
Rougemount Drive be received; and
2. That All-Way Stop Controls not be installed at the intersection of
Rougemount Drive at Pine Ridge Drive; and
3. That staff be directed to initiate the traffic operational improvements as
identified in this report.
5.
Director, Operations & Emergency Services, Report OES 24-06
Quotation No. Q-25-2006 for Road Improvements on
Belinda Court, Orion Court and Bonita Avenue
56-62
1. That Report OES 24-06 regarding Road Improvements on Belinda Court,
Orion Court & Bonita Avenue be received:
2. That Quotation Q-25-2006 submitted by Serve Construction Limited for
Road Improvements on Belinda Court, Orion Court and Bonita Avenue in
the amount of $104,522.95 (GST included) be accepted;
3. That the total gross project cost of $107,000 (GST included) and a net
project cost of $100,000 including the above quotation amount and other
project costs identified in this report be approved; and
4. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take
necessary action to bring effect thereto.
6.
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, Report CS 25-06
Development Charges Reserve Fund -
Statement of the Treasurer for 2005
63-71
Executive Committee Meeting
Agenda
Tuesday, May 23, 2006
7:30 pm
Council Chambers
Chair: Councillor Ashe
That Report CS-25-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
respecting the Development Charges Reserve Fund be received and
forwarded to Council for information.
7.
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, Report CS 29-06
Development Charqes - Annuallndexinq
72-75
1. That Report CS 29-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be
received;
2. That effective July 1, 2006 as provided for in Section 16 of By-law
6349/04, the Development Charges referred to in Sections 6 and 11 of
that By-law be increased by 6.2 percent being the annual increase in the
Construction Price Statistics for the Non-Residential Building Construction
Price index as reported by Statistics Canada for the year ended March 31,
2006; and,
3. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be given authority to
give effect thereto.
(II) OTHER BUSINESS
(III) ADJOURNMENT
CiÚI ()~
o 1
REPORT TO
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Report Number: PD 32-06
Date: May 23, 2006
From:
Neil Carroll
Director, Planning & Development
Subject:
Request for Council's Permission to Create Lots by Land Severance
B. and M. Cillo
Lot 8, Plan M90
(719 Simpson Avenue)
City of Pickering
Recommendation:
1. That the request made by Leo Perciasepe of Almont Homes Inc., on behalf of the
owners B. and M. Cillo, be APPROVED, to permit the division of lands (being
Lot 8, Plan M90 [municipally known as 719 Simpson Avenue]) by land severance
rather than by draft plan of subdivision for future residential development.
Executive Summary: The subject property is approximately 0.16 hectres in area,
abuts Browning Avenue to the north, Fairview Avenue to the east and fronts onto
Simpson Avenue to the west. The property is located within the Bay Ridges
Neighbourhood, and is designated Medium Density Residential. On April 10, 2006 the
applicant received conditional approval of land severance applications LD 062/06 to
LD 066/06 by the Region of Durham Land Division Committee to sever five vacant
residential lots while retaining a sixth residential lot. A location map, and the
conceptual site plan illustrating the applicant's proposed severances are included as
Attachments #1 and #2 to this Report.
A subdivision plan is usually required to develop lands divisible into more than three
additional lots. However, Council may authorize use of the land severance process,
where a subdivision plan is inappropriate or unnecessary. Since the subject lands have
the potential to be divided into more than three additional building lots, the applicant
must obtain permission from Pickering Council. The applicant has requested that
Council allow the proposed lots to be created by land severence rather than a Plan of
Subdivision.
It is recommended that the applicant's request to develop the subject lands by land
severance be approved, as all requirements of the City can be appropriately addressed
through conditions of severance approval.
O ')
1-
Report PO 32-06
Date: May 23,2006
Subject: Request for Council's Permission to Develop Lands
by Land Severance
Page 2
Financial Implications: No direct costs to the City are anticipated as a result of this
authorization to develop by land severance.
1.0 BackQround:
1.1 The lands were the subject of a previous application to the Land Division
Committee to sever five residential lots while retaining a sixth residential lot
Previous conditonal approvals to sever five residential lots from the subject
property, along with the retention of a sixth residential lot, were granted by the
Region of Durham Land Division Committee in 1998 (LD 105/98 to LD 112/98).
This decision lapsed, as the conditions of the severence were not fulfilled within
the required one year time period.
1.2 The applicant submitted the required Land Severence applications
The applicant re-submitted Land Severance Applications to the Region of
Durham Land Division Committee (LD 62/06 to LD 66/06), proposing to sever
five vacant parcels, while retaining a sixth residential lot (see Attachment #1 -
Location Map and Attachment #2 - Conceptual Site Plan illustrating the applicant's
proposed severances). The Committee approved the applications, subject to
conditions, on April 10, 2006.
The proposed severed parcels and proposed retained parcel (Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
and 6 as indicated on Attachment #2) are designated Urban Residential -
Medium Density Area within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood. The five proposed
severed parcels would have lot frontages ranging between 8.8 and 10.7 metres,
lot areas varying from 238 to 310 square metres, and comply with the existing
"S-SD-1" - single/semi-detached zoning provisions. The proposed retained
parcel (Part 4 as indicated on Attachment #2) would have a lot frontage of
approximately 9.2 metres fronting Fairview Road and would provide a lot area of
approximately 280 square metres.
Section 15.26(b) of the Pickering Official Plan requires that an ownership of land
that is capable of being divided into more than three additional lots be developed
by a Plan of Subdivision, except where it is demonstrated to Council's
satisfaction that a subdivision plan is neither appropriate nor necessary. The
subject lands are capable of being divided into more than three additional lots,
and therefore permission is required from Council to allow development to
proceed through the land severance process.
Report PO 32-06
0 ')
'-'
Date: May 23,2006
Page 3
Subject: Request for Council's Permission to Develop Lands
by Land Severance
2.0 City's Interests to be Addressed Through Conditions of Land Severance
The City's requirements for developing the subject lands will be addressed
through conditions of the current land severance applications. Among other
conditions, the owner will be required to enter into an appropriate development
agreement with the City, to address matters typically included in subdivision
agreements such as, but not limited to, stormwater management, grading and
drainage, road widening, access and entrances, fencing, parkland dedication,
easements, and securities.
It is recommended that the applicant's request to develop the subject lands by
land severance be approved as no new roads are required, and as all
requirements of the City can be appropriately addressed through the conditions
of the current severance approvals.
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Applicant's Submitted Plan
Prepared By:
Approved I Endorsed By:
.~~ )/'
<- / d/ ~
~ ¡¿'d&¡/t&¡~
Rick Cefaratti
Planner II
, RPP
ing & Development
RC:ld
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering City Council
?/
,.
("
---
o
't
ATTACHMENT I
REPORT I PD
I TO
32 - oCo
~ u:: r~ '- / '\ - I I
L- PATMORE
~ ;J~
1--.- o L NE
I rv~ ;:.~ -
~ <::)~ ¡'- «
~ 0
It~ cr
I-- ~~ -
- -
-
- - '------ <0 I--
J /I ::J '----- C'~ -
~- L5 ~ I--
-! - I-- -
~11)1l ~- f-- -
I
U f--
HALLER AVENUE ~
--w T
( -- ::J
Z
-- W
~
- ~
- ~ II
-
f----- 'VO
1--
OLD ORCHARD AVENUE
1-- r-- I
1-- U1
f----- ;:;; f----- :5
w '-'
U1 > - ::J ~L COOK 8 II IIJL
a:: 0
<c - 0
( a::1~ lJ...
-
« ::>I-Æ,q & LUNA CRT
>:ê5 - - ~
- ~ IIII!~
Ç.elf BROWNING AVE. '"
~~~ ill \ _( ILONA PARK I
~
S z - a::;;-;I -
PROPERTY ~ <{~I ~ tmffiHE
II -
\~ -
-r¡
~t' I~~I fR ll-~
z - ROAD
WATERP~ ~i - ~
STR I-- L
~l
\ll I ----;
I--
~ \ COMMERCE STREET COMME
FRENCHMAN '5 l=~-=~ ~_ I I
ö ~
U1
BAY L5=r-f-- - -f-
-! 11--1_
0... 0
ANNLAND ~
Þ J ~-
1-- w- -~
" >--- I \ ~-
==\ --1 - STRE
WHARF
~ I
T III ~
rr / II II
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PLAN M90, LOT 8 l'
OWNER B. CILLO & M. CILLO DATE MAR. 9, 2006 DRAWN BY JB
FILE No. LD 62/06 TO LD 66/06 SCALE 1 :5000 CHECKED BY RP
O~Q :sources: PN-3
~ -1~~;e~p~n¿e';i;~s~~!I ~~·DD~~~s.it~ulll:.r:~~~".RO~~~~~d~bN~e~e~fad,; ~r\~r:el:.n of :Iurvey.
ATTACHMENT' 2 TO
REPORT # PO ~2 -eta
o
f....
d
INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED PLAN
LD 062/06 TO LD 066/06· B. & M. CILLO
23.3m 30.4m
PART 1 PART 6
LANDS e
LANDS .....
rOBe ci
SEVERED rOBE ....
SEVERED
W 30.4m W
::J
Z ::J
W 30.4m Z
~ PART 5 w
PART 2 LANDS ~
Z e LANDS rOBE à3
0
tn C () rOBE SEVERED
a.. có SEVERED ~
:i
iñ 30.4m ~
PART 3 PART 4
LANDS
rOBE LANDS
SEVERED rOBE
RETAINED
30.4m . 30.4m
I
BROWNING AVENUE
~
THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES
DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN, APRIL 4, 2006.
o 8
CiÚI ()~
REPORT TO
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Report Number: PD 33-06
Date: May 23,2006
From:
Neil Carroll
Director, Planning & Development
Subject:
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 1/06
1678445 Ontario Ltd.
1630 - 1634 Bayly Street
South Part of Lot 19, Concession 1
City of Pickering
Recommendation:
1. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 1/06 be APPROVED, to amend
the existing zoning on the subject property to add a body-rub parlour as a
permitted use on lands being South Part of Lot 19, Concession 1, City of
Pickering.
2. That the amending zoning by-law to implement Zoning By-law Amendment
Application A 1/06, as set out in Appendix I to Report PO 33-06, be FORWARDED to
City Council for enactment.
Executive Summary: The applicant requests a change to the zoning by-law to add
a body-rub parlour as a permitted use on lands located at the northwest corner of
Bayly Street and Salk Road (see Location Map, Attachment #1).
The subject property supports a one-storey building (formerly the Toronto Fire
Department Employees Credit Union Ltd.) with a rear parking area accessed from
Salk Road. No exterior alteration is proposed to accommodate the requested use (see
Applicant's Submitted Site Plan, Attachment #2). The applicant proposes to convert the
interior of the building to accommodate a body-rub parlour with four rooms, a lobby, a
washroom, an office and a staff room (see Applicant's Submitted Conceptual Floor
Plan, Attachment #3). The property is located within the boundary defined by Municipal
By-law 6649/06 as an area where a body-rub parlour may operate, subject to obtaining
zoning approval.
It is recommended that the application be approved and that the draft by-law be forwarded
to Council for enactment.
Financial Implications: No direct costs to the City are anticipated as a result of the
proposed development.
Report PO 33-06
o 7
Date: May 23, 2006
Subject: 1678445 Ontario Inc. (A 1/06)
Page 2
Background:
1.0 Comments Received
1.1 At the March 23, 2006 Information Meeting
(see text of Information Report, Attachment #4 and Meeting Minutes Attachment #5)
- S. Keser, solicitor for the applicant, gave a brief overview of the proposed
business and stated that the establishment will be kept very conservative, i.e.
no external changes, no external advertising but a small external signage at
the back;
- S. Keser expressed concern respecting the limitation of the total number of
body-rub parlour licences to three in Pickering;
- no other comments were received;
1.2 Written Comments Received Before and After the Information Meeting
- no comments were received;
1.3 Agencies and City Departments
Region of Durham Planning
Conservation Authority
Fire Services
Veridian Connections
Municipal Law Enforcement
Services
- no objection;
- no objection;
- no objection;
- no objection;
- subject property is located within the
boundary as established for body-rub
parlours within By-law 6649/06;
- By-law 6649/06 provides for three
licences to be issued in the City, and
two licences have been issued to
date (see Attachment #6).
2.0 Discussion
2.1 Use and Compatibility
2.1.1 Proposed use conforms to Official Plans
The applicant is proposing to add a body-rub parlour as a permitted use on lands
located at the northwest corner of Bayly Street and Salk Road (see
Attachment #1). The subject property is designated "Employment Area - General
Employment" within the Brock Industrial Neighbourhood in the Pickering Official
Plan. This designation permits the proposed use to be considered. The
applicant's proposal conforms to the Pickering Official Plan and the Region of
Durham Official Plan.
o 8
Report PO 33-06
Date: May 23, 2006
Subject: 1678445 Ontario Inc. (A 1/06)
Page 3
2.1.2 ExistinQ site desiQn can accommodate the use
The subject property is bounded by Bayly Street and Salk Road, and is
surrounded by industrial and commercial uses. Unobstructed views of the site
from public streets are provided, which allows the site to be visually monitored,
addressing safety concerns. The proposed location is within the boundary
defined by Municipal By-law 6649/06 (Body-Rub Parlour By-law) as an area
where a body-rub parlour use may be considered. The operation of a body-rub
parlour will be regulated in accordance with the requirements of the Body-Rub
Parlour By-law.
The bungalow-style building on the subject property was renovated in 1998 for
office use as the Toronto Fire Department Employees Credit Union Ltd., which
was designed to be single-tenanted on a self-contained lot (see Attachment #2).
The subject property is 0.16 hectares in size with wide yards providing significant
buffers from surrounding lands. The applicant proposes to convert the interior
space (approximately 103 square metres in gross floor area) to accommodate a
body-rub parlour with four rooms, a lobby, a washroom, an office and a staff
room (see Attachment #3). No exterior alteration is proposed.
Currently, a total of nine parking spaces are provided on-site. The on-site
parking supply is considered sufficient to accommodate the proposed use. If
required, area is available to accommodate additional parking spaces.
2.1.3 Any exterior chanqes and siQnaqe will be reQulated
Site functioning matters, such as exterior lighting, landscaping, parking, and
signs will be controlled through site plan review process. Any signage proposed
on-site will be subject to the requirements of the Municipal Sign By-law and
Body-Rub Parlour By-law.
2.2 Zoning By-law Performance Standards
2.2.1 The proposed by-law will limit the qross leasable floor area
The impact of the proposed use can be regulated through performance
standards contained in the implementing zoning by-law. It is recommended that
the by-law limit the number of body-rub parlours at this site to one, and limit the
gross leasable floor area of the body-rub parlour use to a maximum of
110 square metres. This recommended maximum floor area restriction is similar
to that of the other two approved body-rub parlours in Pickering (110 square
metres and 130 square metres). These limitations will ensure that the proposed
use will not increase the massing of the structure on the subject property.
o 9
Report PO 33-06
Date: May 23,2006
Subject: 1678445 Ontario Inc. (A 1/06)
Page 4
2.2.2 The existinq by-law will qovern all other zoninq requirements
No further amendments to the current 'M1' zoning are proposed or required. The
current by-law requirements will continue to apply to the property. Committee of
Adjustment Decision PICA 74/96, which provides relief for the reduced front yard
depth and parking stall size, will continue to apply to the subject property.
2.3 Municipal By-law 6649/06 - Body-Rub Parlours
2.3.1 The proposed body-rub parlour complies with the Municipal By-law
On April 3, 2006, City Council passed Municipal By-law 6649/06, which provides
requirements for the licensing and regulating of body-rub parlours within the City
of Pickering. The by-law includes a provision that restricts the location in which
body-rub parlours may operate (see Body-Rub Parlour Location Map,
Attachment #7), subject to a zoning by-law amendment application being
approved. The subject property is located within the defined area in the City.
This by-law also restricts the maximum number of body-rub parlours in the City to
three. Currently, there are two legally licenced body-rub parlours operating in
Pickering (see Attachment #7). A proposed (third) body-rub parlour (Zoning
By-law Amendment Application A 22/05) was refused by City Council on
April 3, 2006, and that decision was subsequently appealed to the Ontario Municipal
Board (OM B). An OMB hearing has not yet been scheduled. The applicant for
this application is aware of the Municipal By-law restriction of three body-rub
parlour licenses.
3.0 Applicant's Comments
The applicant is aware of the content of this report, has reviewed the draft zoning
by-law, and concurs with the recommendations.
APPENDIX:
Appendix I: Draft By-law
Attachments:
1 . Location Map
2. Applicant's Submitted Site Plan
3. Applicant's Submitted Conceptual Floor Plan
4. Text of Information Report No. 04-06
5. Public Information Meeting Minutes
6. Comments from Pickering Municipal Law Enforcement Services
7. Body-Rub Parlour Location Map
ü¡O
Report PO 33-06
Date: May 23,2006
Subject: 1678445 Ontario Inc. (A 1/06)
Page 5
Prepared By:
Approved / Endorsed By:
-'1
I
/
Joyce
Plann
Neil Carrol , RPP
Director, Planning & Development
JY:jf
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering City Council
,,-
,1
DRAFT BY-LAW
APPENDIX I TO
REPORT PD 33-06
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 1/06
OIl
012
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO.
Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 2511, as
amended, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of
Durham, in South Part of Lot 19, Concession 1, in the City of Pickering.
(A 01/06)
WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering deems it desirable to
permit an additional use being a Body-Rub Parlour, on the subject lands, being South
Part of Lot 19, Concession 1, in the City of Pickering.
AND WHEREAS an amendment to By-law 2511, as amended, is therefore deemed
necessary;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF
PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. TEXT AMENDMENT
Section 16 Storaqe & Liqht Manufacturinq Zone- "M1" of By-law 2511, is hereby
amended by adding the following new Subsection 16.5.2 after Subsection 16.5.1:
16.5.2 - South Part of Lot 19, Concession 1 (1630 - 1634 Bayly Street)
(1) Definitions
(a) "Body-Rub" includes the kneading, manipulating, rubbing, massaging,
touching, or stimulating, by any means, of a person's body or part
thereof but does not include medical or therapeutic treatment given by
a person otherwise duly qualified, licenced or registered so to do
under the laws of the Province of Ontario;
(b) "Body-Rub Parlour" includes any premises or part thereof where a
body-rub is performed, offered or solicited in pursuance of a trade,
calling, business or occupation, but does not include any premises or
part thereof where the body-rubs performed are for the purpose of
medical or therapeutic treatment and are performed or offered by
persons otherwise duly qualified, licenced or registered so to do
under the laws of the Province of Ontario;
-2-
013
(2) Provisions for a Body-Rub Parlour
In addition to the provision of Subsection 16.1 hereof, a Body-Rub Parlour
is permitted on lands known as South Part of Lot 19, Concession 1
(1630 - 1634 Bayly Street), in the City of Pickering, provided that the
following requirements are met:
(a) No more than one body-rub parlour shall be permitted;
(b) The gross leasable floor area of the body-rub parlour shall not exceed
110 square metres;
2. BY-LAW 2511
By-law 2511, as amended, is hereby further amended only to the extent necessary
to give effect to the provisions of this By-law as set out in Section 1 above.
Definitions and subject matter not specifically dealt with in this By-law shall be
governed by the relevant provisions of By-law 2511, as amended.
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
This By-law shall come into force in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 5th day of June, 2006.
Debi A. Bentley, City Clerk
J
n 1 4 :>3::°'.
V- ~~ (~
~~40' ~J[ .
'¡-\\G¡.-\\N
0
<
cr 0
a::
0 ~ I
0 Q;-Q
- I
cr
cr
0
U
PLUMMER STREET
0
~ \
~
0 u
>- 0
a::
I ~ CD
;0 -I
0 <
>- V1
0
"
o
<
o
a::
BAYLY STREET BAYLY
"
~ SUBJECT
0 PROPERTY
0 \ \
-
~ \ l
~
0
U
í/
0
0 <{ ....-.<
0
cr 0 a::: ORANGEBROOK COURT
0 < '<
0 ~
>- a:: U
I 0
a:::
CD
(
~
w
/~)
\~
City of Pickering
PROPERlY DESCRIPTION SOUTH PART OF LOT 19, CONCESSION 1
OWNER 1678445 ONTARIO LTD DATE FEB. 10, 2006
FILE No. A 01/06 SCALE 1 :5000
.
Planning & Development Department
DRAWN BY JB
CHECKED BY JY
1
o~o 50urc..:
~~ö;·~p~¿·=::~·~~. 1:~~;::,~,:t~II·~¡:~~~'·R.-:~~~:t·N':·~·I';~od,; ~ft S:,'::::." of .wrv.y.
PN·4
';, #_-"'~
I I; Pi.: .-_3.3,~Q (q
INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S
SUBMITTED PLAN
A 01/06 -1678445 ONTARIO LTD.
,~- ···--·~"'·-···-·-·-"-'T'~-~.l.~__.._.
'"._--~ J
--j ,
r .
--
... 7.3m
5.3m+
..---.
:=i
---\
----i C
I «
:J 0
.~_. ' ~
~
. -'
-,- «
-'--~I CIJ
---
_. -
:=J
I
J
J\ .=J
->"---
/, .. f
j
_ASPHALT
PARKING LO
E
r-..
Lri
<0
"'5.7m"
EXISTING
COMMERCIAL
STRUCTURE
~-_.
,/
i1"
/
-'~
==--.
-. --
BAYLY STREET
015
,
THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES
DIVISIDN MAPPING AND DESIGN, FEBRUARY 10. 2006,
úlß
:3
#.........._,_ TO
HF'GRT II pü33 ,- 0 ~
INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S
SUBMITTED
CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN
A 01/06 -1678445 ONTARIO LTD.
ROOM 1
3.3m X 3.3m
ROOM 2
2.7m X 3.3m
ROOM 3
2.7m X 3.3 m.
WASHROOM
BAYLY STREET
STAFF
ROOM
OFFICE
LOBBY
ROOM 4
3.0m X 3.3m
o
<C
o
n::
~
..J
<C
U)
,
THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES
DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN, MARCH 2. 2006.
ATTACHMENT' if TO
REPORT # PO ~ ~ .- 0 t.
017
CiÚf ()~
INFORMATION REPORT NO. 04-06
FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING OF
March 23, 2006
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC MEETING REQUIREMENTS
OF THE PLANNING ACT, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13
SUBJECT:
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 01/06
1678445 Ontario Ltd.
1630 - 1634 Bayly Street
South Part of Lot 19, Concession 1
City of Pickering
1.0 PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
- the subject property is approximately 0.16 hectares in size, located at the
northwest corner of Bayly Street and Salk Road (see Attachment #1 -
Location Map);
- the subject property currently supports an one-storey building (which was
used as the former Fire Credit Union) and has an access from Salk Road to
the rear parking area of the subject property (see Attachment #2 - Site Plan);
- the subject land is surrounded by commercial and industrial uses.
2.0 APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL
- the applicant proposes to amend the existing zoning on the subject property
to add body rub parlour as a permitted use;
- this use is proposed to occupy the entire building with a total gross floor area
of approximately 103 square metres;
- the applicant has submitted a conceptual floor plan showing four treatment
rooms, a lobby, a washroom, an office and a staff room (see Attachment #3-
Conceptual Floor Plan);
- the applicant proposes no exterior changes to the existing building.
G18
Information Report No. 04-06
. -. /, r'pi' ':,....¡ # t.¡. . TO
ht"ö'-"Ii...'I~: _..___
., '. :) '::I.
, i¡-¡' t PI'. '"~-'ti:'M_"_. u_
Page 2
3.0 OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING
3.1 Durham ReQional Official Plan
- the Durham Regional Official Plan designates this area as "Urban Areas -
Employment Area," where development is intended to be predominately for
employment purposes;
- limited personal service uses are permitted under this designation;
- the applicant's proposal appears to conform with this designation;
3.2 PickerinQ Official Plan
the subject property is designated "General Employment" within the
Brock Industrial Neighbourhood;
- this designation allows for "limited personal service uses serving the area";
- Bayly Street is under the jurisdiction of the Region of Durham and is a Type A
Arterial Road, which is the highest order arterial road designed to carry large
volumes of traffic;
- Salk Road is designated as a Local Road, which is to provide access to
individual properties and carry local traffic;
- the applicant's proposal conforms to the applicable Official Plan policies;
3.3 ZoninÇf By-law 2511
- the subject property is currently zoned "M1" - Yard Storage and Light
Manufacturing Zone by Zoning By-law 2511, as amended;
- M1 zoning allows certain types of commercial and industrial uses, but
currently does not permit a body rub parlour;
- an amendment to the zoning by-law is required to add the proposed use to
the existing zoning;
3.4' Municipal By-law PertaininQ to Body Rub Parlour
- on October 16, 2000, City Council passed Municipal By-law No. 5764/00,
which provides requirements for the licensing and regulation of body rub
parlours within the City of Pickering;
- this by-law includes a provision defining the areas (see Attachment #4 -
Schedule "B" to By-law 5764/00) where body rub parlours may be considered
to operate, subject to a zoning by-law amendment application to permit the use;
- a "Body Rub" includes the kneading, manipulating, rubbing, massaging,
touching, or stimulating, by any means, of a person's body or part thereof but
does not include medical or therapeutic treatment given by a person
otherwise duly qualified, licensed or registered so to do under the laws of the
Province of Ontario;
- the proposed use falls under the definition of a "Body Rub" and the subject
property falls within the defined area where body rub parlours can be
considered;
Information Report No. 04-06
if
33 -QJ;) ..
.<-- ''''''_'''-':''''''
Page 3
019
Pickering City Council is considering an amendment to By-law No. 5764/00
and a restriction of a maximum number of three body rub parlours is being
proposed through this amendment.
4.0 RESULTS OF CIRCULATION
4.1 Resident Comments
- no resident comments have been received to date;
4.2 AQencv Comments
- no agency comments have been received to date;
4.3 Staff Comments
- in reviewing the application to date, planning staff has identified the following
matters for further review and consideration:
· evaluate the compatibility of the proposed use within the surrounding uses;
· assess the sufficiency of the current parking supply on-site;
· determine whether or not floor-space limitations for the proposed use
should be included in a zoning by-law;
· confirm the status of the proposed amendment to By-law No. 5764/00
which is currently being considered by City Council;
- this Department will conclude its position on the application after it has
received and assessed comments from the circulated departments, agencies
and the public.
5.0 PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
- written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning
& Development Department;
- oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting;
- all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report
prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent
meeting of Council or a Committee of Council;
- if you wish to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision, you must
provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this
proposal;
- if you wish to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal, you
must request such in writing to the City Clerk.
lJ ¡~ 0
Information Report No. 04-06
if
3 3- c.?,~*J
Page 4
6.0 OTHER INFORMATION
6.1 Appendix No. I
- list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City
Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing
report;
6.2 Information Received
- copies of the applicant's submitted plan are available for viewing at the offices
of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department;
6.3 Property Principal
- this application was submitted by Christopher Trzcinski, on behalf of
1678445 Ontario Ltd.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
Joyce Yeh
Planner I
Lynda Taylor, MCIP, RPP
Manager, Development Review
JY:ld
Attachments
Copy: Director, Planning & Development
021
if _,_'t_~_p ro
:p ¡ Pl.' .3~~,,_,
APPENDIX NO. I TO
INFORMATION REPORT NO. 04-06
COMMENTING RESIDENTS AND LANDOWNERS
(1 ) none received to date
COMMENTING AGENCIES
(1 ) none received to date
COMMENTING CITY DEPARTMENTS
(1 ) none received to date
022
5
33 ~ç') b
Excerpts from
Minutes / Meeting Summary
Statutory Public Information Meeting
Council Chambers
Thursday, March 23, 2006
7:00 pm.
CUt¡ ()~
Attendees: Councillor Dickerson - Chair
Councillor McLean - left 7:20 pm to attend Library Meeting
Ross Pym, Principal Planner - Development Review
Joyce Yeh, Planner I
Birgit Wilson - Recording Secretary
Also Attendeing: Samantha Keser, Barrister & Solicitor
2. ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 01/06
1678445 ONTARIO LIMITED
1630 - 1634 BA YL Y STREET
SOUTH PART OF LOT 19, CONCESSION 1
CITY OF PICKERING
1. Planner Comments
Joyce Yeh, Planner I provided an overview of the property location, applicant's
proposal and City's Official Plan policies pertaining to this site, as outlined in the
Information Report # 04-06.
She explained the definition of "Body Rub Parlour", as it pertains to the City of
Pickering's By-law and Municipal Act as being any establishment that employs any
person who "puts hands on the body" without the designation of "Registered Massage
Therapist" .
2. Applicant Comments
Samantha Keser, Barrister & Solicitor for the applicant, Mr. Christoper Trzinski,
stated that her client is a university educated, married, well respected member of the
community who seeks to establish a business for adults18 years and over.
She further stated that as her client is fully aware of the public concerns for such a
business, he has taken steps to ensure that the outside of the establishment is kept
very conservative, Le.; no external changes, no external advertising, small external
signage.
Page 1
CORP0228-2/02
5
33 - Ô b
023
Ms. Keser further voiced her client's concerns with the fact that he only recently found
out that in the City of Pickering only three Body Rub Parlour licences will be issued.
Ms. Keser explained that one of the applicant's statements that her establishment is
for therapeutic purposes and her clients would include men, women and children is
completely false and misleading. She will be appearing before the Executive
Committee Meeting of March 27, 2006 to voice these concerns.
3. Comments from Members of the Public
No comments from members of the public.
4 Comments from the Chair
Councillor Dickerson thanked Ms. Kesler for the comments and stated that as long as
her client is proposing to open a legal business, the City of Pickering will give serious
consideration to the application. He further stated that not every application is
accepted and advised Ross Pym and Joyce Yeh that if the applicant of January 19,
2006 is misrepresenting her business, the application should be re-evaluated.
The meeting adjourned at 7:46 pm.
Page 2
CORP0228-2/02
024
I ',: il Î/ TC
h'; ;,,:,,1 t PI.: ~D· (Ì_~~
CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CLERKS DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
May 10,2006
To:
Joyce Yeh
Planner I
From:
Kim Thompson
Manager, By-law Enforcement Services
Subject:
Application for Rezoning
- Body Rub Parlour, 1630 Bayly Street
- File: B-2400
Further to the application for a rezoning for the purposes of a body-rub parlour for
property municipally known as 1630-1634 Bayly Street, please be advised that the
subject property is located within the boundary as established for body rub parlours
within By-law 6649/06.
The by-law provides for three licences to be issued within the defined area, and to date,
two licences have been issued. If approved, the applicant would have to apply to the
Clerk's Division for the requisite licence.
Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to advise.
BW/kt
.v 'L I L J 11-------- ",,'1I111111I1I1111I1I1I1ï
~ " J...--: ~~"" -----
\- ilJ..-- .. "~"~I'
~ llr) :::;;. ,,,,,"
~~ I))~~~
~ l ~_~~~~
0. ~" ~ J
~ f7; ~ - ~I¿"--~
,,- vv '--- .,.,--J
o1/b6· - ¡ - ::>
.1~ 8- 50 tan L~J 1 _r.-I F h
ct Pr, ~" L.J: -As: If I
1 ~ i . - b'nf
- ..
'-(- æ
-
= -
-
§p RJ ~~.;\
æ BY. ~ ~ ~f/õ5"
æ 1 App ved
Ji- I~ I
a Llm-- ª I ~, _PICKERIN ANGELS I
I Expansron 'roposed
r _ ~ Refj sedl "Cou,. .;;
/ § ~ I
1-:
.
!
-
-
-
-
IHilI - 11(
~ 'I §
;::::;;- irl =
V =
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
City of Pickering
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION VARIES
OWNER N/A
FILE No. A 01/06
.-
.1l1Im
~
11/1
II
ATTACHMENT' 7 TO
HEt'ORl # PO :3 ~. () b
025
-
-
\n
1\
-'\
JJ '\
-,
.....
-,
-
....
'I~
I
--..L.
"
a
I
I
J
-
.......
i
I
~ ~
~
?II
~ I-- II?
~ ~ ~ STOC~rts .
1___ jJ - AP& ~ I "5 I [ f
',,, I
PARLO ms MAYBEC E D i
TO OPE I ATE PENDING A~I
AME ,DMENT APPLlCA N +
"
----------------~--------
----------------,,--------
:: III ::::¡
I: ::J
II ~ E
Planning & Development Department
-
-
'---
I--
I--
I
--.,..
I
-
-
I
s
DATE:
l'
DRAWN BY
SCALE: N.T.S
CHECKED BY JV
éï!ö ---SOurc..:
~õ"~;.~pE¡J.~:~.~~. '~p.::.~.~t~,t~¡:~~~,.·Re~,.;~ø~t·N~·_:r;~:,; :~'S~,.:,I:.n of .uI""'.y.
PN-4
Ü 2 ftiúl ()~
REPORT TO
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Report Number: PO 34-06
Date: May 23, 2006
From:
Neil Carroll
Director, Planning & Development
Subject:
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 17/05
Lakeland Associates Ltd. on behalf of Christine Ward
3325 Highway 7, Hamlet of Kinsale
(North Part of Lot 2, Concession 5)
City of Pickering
Recommendation:
1. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 17/05, submitted by Lakeland
Associates Ltd. on behalf of Christine Ward, to permit a dog daycare and
boarding facility with associated retailing, on lands being North Part of Lot 2,
Concession 5, City of Pickering, be APPROVED as a temporary use for a period
of three years, subject to conditions outlined in Appendix I to Report PO 34-06.
Executive Summary: The applicant proposes to amend the current zoning on the
northern portion of the subject property to permit a dog daycare and boarding facility
with associated retailing. The property is located on the south side of Highway 7, east
of Audley Road, and is partially within the Hamlet of Kinsale (see Location Map,
Attachment #1 ).
The dog daycare and boarding facility is a non-crating facility in which the dogs will be free
to play outdoors during the day within a fenced exercise area in the rear yard, and all
dogs will be boarded overnight within an accessory structure (see Attachment #2 -
Applicant's Submitted Plan). The business owner will reside within the existing dwelling
on the property and intends to convert the attached garage to accommodate a retail use
accessory to the dog daycare and boarding facility use.
It is recommended that the use be permitted on a temporary basis through a temporary
use by-law in order to monitor the operation and fully assess any potential impacts the
use may have on surrounding properties. Prior to an implementing temporary use
zoning by-law being forwarded to Council for consideration, further studies are required
to address noise attenuation measures and the structural integrity of the existing
accessory structure on-site. Further, the applicant will be required to enter into a Site
Plan Agreement with the City.
Should the use demonstrate its ability to operate over the three year time period without
disruption to the community, permanent zoning could then be considered by Council.
It is recommended that this application be approved subject to the conditions outlined in
Appendix I.
Report PO 34-06 Date: May 23,20(($27
Subject: Lakeland Associates Ltd. on behalf of C. Ward (A 17/05) Page 2
Financial Implications: No direct costs to the City are anticipated as a result of the
proposed development.
Background:
1.0 Comments Received
1.1 At the August 4,2005, Public Information Meeting
(see text of Information Report and Meeting Minutes, Attachments #4 and #5)
A shop owner in Kinsale advised that this is a much needed facility.
The future owner of the abutting property to the west (3315 Highway 7)
expressed concern regarding the possible noise from the dogs, and also
requested that consideration be given to moving the outdoor exercise area to the
east side of the existing accessory structure.
1.2 Following the Public Meeting
A property owner south of the subject property (3505 Audley Road) provided
written comments requesting further information regarding the application (see
Attachment #6) (Additional information was provided by staff as requested).
1.3 Agency Comments
Durham Region
Planning Department
. no objection;
. the northern portion of the property
is designated "Hamlet" and the
southern portion is designated
"Major Open Space" in the Durham
Regional Official Plan;
· the proposed uses may be permitted
on the northern portion of the subject
property within the "Hamlet"
designation (see Attachment #7).
. no objection;
. Ministry permits are required for
any new buildings or structures
within 46 metres of Highway 7, and
for all signs visible to the highway;
· a minimum 14 metre setback is
required from the Ministry's property
limit to any new buildings and/or
structures.
Ministry of Transportation
Ü 2 ~eport PD 34-06 Date: May 23, 2006
Subject: Lakeland Associates Ltd. on behalf of C. Ward (A 17/05) Page 3
Ministry of Transportation
(continued)
· no driveway aisles, building amenity
or operational arrangement vital to
the viability of the proposal is
permitted within the 14 metre
setback;
· any parking within the 14 metre
setback must be surplus to the site
requirements and so noted on a Site
Plan (see Attachment #8).
Central Lake Ontario
Conservation Authority
. no objection;
· the proposal is located outside of the
flood plain associated with the
tributary of Lynde Creek which
crosses the southern portion of the
property (see Attachment #9).
1.4 City Departments
Municipal By-law (Verbal)
Fire Services
· the proposed use may be
considered a Kennel under the
City's Pet Shops and Kennels
By-law (6299/04) provided the
owners of the dogs agree to the
non-crating of their pets;
· improvements to the existing
accessory structure may be required
to meet the requirements of the
municipal by-law.
· review from a professional
architect/engineer, or both, to address
a change of use under the
requirements/provisions of the
Ontario Building Code may be
required;
· a complete electrical and HV AC
inspection will be required;
· the services of a structural engineer
must be obtained to ensure that the
existing accessory structure is
structurally sound prior to occupancy
(see Attachment #10).
Report PO 34-06
Date: May 23, 2006
029
Subject: Lakeland Associates Ltd. on behalf of C. Ward (A 17/05)
Page 4
2.0 Discussion
Location and Zoninq
Lakeland Associates on behalf of Christine Ward, proposes to amend the existing
zoning by-law to permit the establishment of a dog daycare and boarding facility
with an accessory retail use on the property known as 3325 Highway 7. The
property is located on the south side of Highway 7, east of Audley Road and is
approximately 4.0 hectares in size (see Location Map, Attachment # 1). The
property supports an existing detached dwelling and accessory structure, and is
currently dual zoned "CLR8" - Cluster Residential Zone on the northern portion, as
amended by By-law 2623/87, and "A" - Rural Agricultural Zone on the remaining
southern portion, as zoned by By-law 3037. The applicant proposes to amend the
"CLR8" zoning on the northern portion of the property (approximately
0.64 hectares), as this portion of the property is contained within the boundary of
the Hamlet of Kinsale. The zoning on the remaining southern portion of the
property will not be amended as part of this application as this portion is not
contained within the Hamlet boundary, is traversed by a tributary of the
Lynde Creek, and is within the Greenbelt Plan (see Official Plan and By-law 3037
Information, Attachment #3). The property is surrounded by existing residential
and agricultural uses.
2.1 The proposed use complies with the rural settlement policies of the City's
Official Plan.
The northern portion of the subject property is designated Rural Settlements -
Rural Hamlets and Hamlet Residential within the Kinsale Settlement Area. The
policies for the Kinsale Settlement Area encourage opportunities for enhancing
Kinsale through general or site-specific zoning that permits arts and craft studios,
workshops and small-scale commercial enterprises, provided the historic
character of the village and the interests of the neighbouring residents are
respected. The policies of the Pickering Official Plan also encourage a vibrant
rural economy with a wide range of rural uses and activities.
The introduction of a dog daycare and boarding facility on the northern portion of
the subject property is considered an appropriate use of land and meets the
objectives of the Pickering Official Plan for the rural area.
2.2 The proposed use is a non-crating facility which will provide for the
daytime care and overnight boarding of dogs.
The proposed dog daycare and boarding facility is currently operating within
Whitby on lands leased from the Central Lake Ontario Conversation Authority
(CLOCA), and is known as 'Corinna the Doggie Minder'. As the lease with
CLOCA is expiring, the owner is interested in relocating the business to
Pickering. Based on the experience of the existing operation, the business owner
submitted a Business Operations Plan outlining the proposed operation of the
facility once it is relocated to the subject property.
(j 3 0 Report PO 34-06 Date: May 23, 2006
Subject: Lakeland Associates Ltd. on behalf of C. Ward (A 17/05) Page 5
The proposed facility will provide for the daytime care of dogs in which a dog may
be dropped off and picked up by their owner within the same day, and will also
provide for the regular boarding of dogs in which the dogs may stay for an
extended period of time and are housed on-site. The facility has set hours of
operation in which the dogs can only be dropped off in the morning and picked up
in the evening. All dogs are assessed prior to the initial stay to ensure that the
dog is social, friendly and well behaved.
The proposed boarding facility is different from a kennel in that it is a non-crating
facility. The dogs will be free to play outdoors during the day within a fenced
exercise area or within the accessory structure on-site. All dogs will be housed
within the accessory structure at night until morning.
The owner of the business has indicated that the noise generated from the dogs
is typically minimal as the dogs are kept busy and well exercised throughout the
day and are never isolated or crated.
In addition to the dog daycare and boarding facility, the business owner intends
to convert the existing attached garage to accommodate an accessory retail use.
Typically, the proposed retailing component would include the sale of pet toys,
photos of the dogs, collectibles and other souvenirs related to the dog daycare
and boarding business.
2.3 Prior to an implementing by-law being forwarded to Council, further studies
are required to address noise attenuation measures and the structural
integrity of the existing accessory structure.
Although minimal noise is anticipated from this use as it is a non-crating facility,
further investigation is required to determine what, if any, noise attenuation
measures may be required to ensure any possible noise generated by the dogs
at night will not effect surrounding properties. An acoustical report from a
qualified engineer will be required to be prepared and submitted for approval.
The required noise report must demonstrate what measures will be taken to
ensure the existing accessory structure, or any future structures in which the
dogs are to be housed, will appropriately attenuate noise generated from the
operation of the facility. Depending on the complexity or the recommendations of
the acoustical report, the City may require a peer review of the report at the cost
of the applicant. The applicant will be required to enter into an appropriate Site
Plan Agreement with the City through which the recommendations of the noise
report will be implemented.
In addition, if the owner o(the business intends to use the existing accessory
structure on-site for the boarding of the dogs, a report from a structural engineer
will be required to ensure that the existing building is structurally sound and does
not pose a risk to the dogs. Any requirements or recommendations proposed
through the report will also be implemented through the Site Plan Agreement
registered on title.
Report PO 34-06
Date: May 23,2006
031'
Subject: Lakeland Associates Ltd. on behalf of C. Ward (A 17/05)
Page 6
The applicant has expressed a desire to have Council's endorsement of the
proposed use prior to additional monies being spent on the required reports and
site plan application. As such, an implementing by-law has not been prepared at
this time and will be forwarded to Council when the required conditions outlined
in Appendix I to this report are fulfilled.
2.4 A temporary use by-law is considered an appropriate method to monitor
the proposed use for a period of three years, and the functioning of the site
will be addressed through the site plan process.
As this is the first facility of this nature within Pickering and considering the
location of the facility within the Hamlet of Kinsale, is it recommended that a
temporary use by-law be established in order to monitor the operation and
assess any unknown impacts on surrounding lands.
A three year by-law term (maximum term for a temporary use under the Planning
Act) is recommended. At the end of the term, Council may consider an application
to extend the use for a further temporary period up to three years, or may consider
an application to zone the lands for this purpose on a permanent basis.
The temporary use by-law established for the dog daycare and boarding facility
and accessory retail uses shall include provisions which limit the number of dogs
permitted on-site at anyone time to a maximum of 30, establish a maximum
gross floor area of 50 square metres for an accessory retail use, and establish
appropriate parking requirements. In addition, a minimum 10 metre setback for
the outdoor exercise area from the abutting properties will be established in order
to address the concerns raised by the abutting property owner to the west.
The functioning of the site, specifically the requirements of the Ministry of
Transportation, parking, signage and the appropriate location of an outdoor
exercise area will be further reviewed and addressed through the site plan
process.
The recommended zoning provisions and requirements to be contained within
any implementing temporary use by-law are outlined in Appendix I to this report.
3.0 Applicant's Comments
The applicant is aware of the content of this report and agrees to the temporary
use zoning for a three year period.
032 Report PO 34-06 Date: May 23, 2006
Subject: Lakeland Associates Ltd. on behalf of C. Ward (A 17/05) Page 7
Appendix:
Appendix I: Proposed Conditions of Approval
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Applicant's Submitted Site Plan
3. Information complied from the Pickering Official Plan and Zoning By-law 3037
4. Text of Information Report
5. Minutes from Statutory Public Meeting
6. Public Comments - M. Chen
7. Region of Durham Planning Department Comments
8. Ministry of Transportation Comments
9. Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Comments
10. Fire Services Comments
Prepared By:
Approved / Endorsed By:
/1
_(~(JAk
Carla Pierini
Planner II
&. ,
(. A ~ ..#'L(
a~~.
Lynda TaytlSr, MCIP, R.
Manager, Development Review
CP:ld
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering City Council
\\.
,/
o(
......._----_.~.."'---
033
APPENDIX I TO
REPORT PD 34-06
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 17/05
1. That prior to an implementing zoning by-law being forwarded to Council for
consideration, the following conditions must be fulfilled to the satisfaction of the
City's Director, Planning & Development:
(a) That the owner/applicant submit for review and approval, an acoustical
report prepared by a qualified engineer for any structures to be used for
the housing or boarding of the dogs associated with the dog daycare and
boarding facility;
(b) That the owner/applicant submit for review and approval, a report
prepared by a structural engineer confirming the existing accessory
structure to be used as part of the dog daycare and boarding facility is
structurally sound;
(c) That the owner/applicant enter into a Site Plan Agreement with the City,
and that any recommendations, abatement measures or requirements
resulting from the required acoustical and structural assessment reports
be implemented and adhered to through the Site Plan Agreement.
2. That the implementing temporary use zoning by-law:
(a) amend Zoning By-law 2623/87 to permit a dog daycare and boarding facility
and an accessory retail store in addition to the existing uses currently
permitted under the "CLR8" zone for a period of three years for the property
known as 3325 Highway 7 (North Part of Lot 2, Concession 5);
(b) include the following definitions:
"DoQ Daycare and Boardinq Facility" - shall mean a facility in which the
daytime care of dogs is provided and shall include the overnight boarding
of dogs in a non-crating environment, but shall not include the breeding or
sale of dogs, or a veterinary clinic.
"Retail Store" - shall mean a building or part of a building in which goods,
wares, merchandise, substances, articles or things are stored, kept and
offered for retail sale to the public.
(!34
(c) include, but not be limited to, the following performance standards and
requirements:
i) the maximum number of dogs permitted at anyone time shall be 30;
ii) the dog daycare and boarding facility use shall be permitted to
operate within an accessory structure;
iii) an outdoor exercise area shall be provided in the rear yard and
shall be set back a minimum of 10 metres from all property lines;
iv) a maximum of one retail store shall be permitted for the sale of
products ancillary to a dog daycare and boarding facility use;
v) the maximum gross floor area of a retail store shall not exceed
50 square metres;
vi) the ancillary retail store shall not be permitted within an accessory
structure.
t,""'l.'·,cr;;,ŒH #. r TO
í;::;UHI ir PC 3t-j- 00
G3:1
)
't l
\ 0
It <C
0 r-.
[t L...J
( <C
,.---- 0
rH
I I--- LL
'\ I-- -
~ -
- LLJ
-
- q)
-
- -
- ¡,
-
\C -
-
W ( çJ- W
Z ~ I Y
- ~ j
~
W ~- j1JT
0 Z
- - I-- -
1 (f) r--- y: PCJflTI ON OF PROPf qJY
~\ áÿt ECT TO ZONI If
I 4W AMENDME
HIGf- r - A 17/05
WAY 7 /
.
"\ 7 I \ \ '.. ><XX: / U
~~ ~ ~ sUf,: ÉNj~
~
L--- I 7- ~
CJ
I
Æ
( ,J 1~c¡6
HO "-l/YYYJ \
:".
-V __ 9
r.i&:;() ð-I" nl ~v cn...r
J r---'_ 0 W
~ r\ [t y:
----"1n <C
( ~
1-----4 C
---\ \ AJ >-
'\ \i W
1 ~ ---.J
0
-....
-'
<C
(
I r 1 \
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION NORTH PART OF LOT 2, CONCESSION 5 1-
OWNER A. GERLACH DATE JUNE 30, 2005 DRAWN BY JB
FILE No. A 17/05 SCALE 1 :10000 CHECKED BY CP
¡g0':'o ;:)ourc..: PN-RUR
Teranet Enterpri!lles Inc. and its .~r~tie"!II. All rlQhta Rese~~d. Not 0 plan of !lurvey.
2005 MPAC and it.. .UDDIi.,.... All ri hta Re..rved. Not a Ian of Survey.
- 1"3-"
u h
'?'I . . ". """, ..2..""
", ¡of .~, ',,,1""1 .,:" ,:¡
kf ,;-~~ii¡"'i':\"f_ . _, ,,J
r"'pr'R'¡' b'· PD 34 -Ck
tit:.. V. . . _~ .-.;
INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S
SUBMITTED SITE PLAN
A 17/05
HIGHWAY 7
k":'" , aO.Om .~; . ~
~ sF'-- \~et f:ti· ~i'<~ - ~
f"" '~ ',., ._., ~~0J~~~ :~~V
. . I' ,- I "~l· ..., ... .~~-~;\J:, .JI .
. !¿.. ""..., \ ::.,-':/ If'.. '. ..
i ..'!.. . ~~" f.·r~. .
=rf1 -----" !®\;~ r:ì (.'1
j~ . ~ " ~~~':.. ~ ::'J ~ ~!~:
~ '\i: io.....'·, ._~
i 1 , . ...-' '.-
j (t '~.' ,) C~d
f \, 'I' -1
'1 -----...' ..~( , .\ ~. ~~ ,"; ':'),1 (~.. .
1 ,. \.~ ~"'. ..,>~. ;:' ",;;.1
E j ~ -- '.,_.... -: ~\ "1 i.."'-"""'.
g ! .... J I -.'"$l \~;' ~.../ ,. â
I EXISTING ii'" ~. '~»..' t co
I DWELLING i. <~. '~~.;~'.' :~) (:~
"'L, , '..~-. ~;ì~r '.:..:
i (1) .... "1
fl.. . '~', (~., .,(~ .''"'è'" (.....J
_. J ~~9l ~1. :.:.J '<' .f
r I~ %~ - ~
r-" ... . . ~ ~. ,. U (~1
I"J" ,.0.", (:y. c:~ ð r) 0 r--- .-¡ ·f,
" ....J~..-:'~.;;:,.; \iJl f '¡o
r 0 PROPOSED (! I ~
r ~ OUTDOOR - . EXISTING I· ~ FUTURE
¡ o. EXERCISE AREA (\ I ~~~G~~~~ .J ~~G~~~~~! j
¡ r)·c·,¡ ·r') t> n. .j .: i I.t
. ..... -'~' .~-,./~~ Lit
, " ,__--;--._______-....--.-c--.... .L_ ._...J~ t·.
I' (7) (~,. {~~ ~c·,~ ,-..
J .... ~ . -, .\ ., ", .'- I
. ......... ~~,,,,,.... 6_:=-'
, . .~,--. ~. ....1 "_/ .
'i'-'!'·-If-~---Jl---'--..Io'-...-·"'---..c.--~~~--X.._'"':·_4;-_" ___ ..-. _ ~_
~ SO.Om
~
THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES
DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN SECTION, JULY 25, 2005.
P"i'"Tl\CH;\I¡U\i, #_.....:d.-.' U
\".'.",«11 1:¡ PI'" .. 'J..L1 -Db
.. ...... .,.'",.." ." "..,__.."..,..I..:;L_,.,~"",_...",..,.~...,,,,,..-,,
(;3'7
'" "...~, ,."
1"".'.\'·
INFORMATION COJ.\tfPILED FROM PICKERING OFFICIAL PLAN & ZONING BY-LAW 3037
,"....... ...., .i./
: 'L#~~.n '>i
<,,": ..
..,;,.,'.':",' ,'"....
I ~. "";
.~.. . ..,
;..... . ".::-'
;.:.;.:; ."
,J.,,:'.:.::....... ".;,
;:'.;'....<..,.\.'..,.
:-",..,':':;' : . ....../
.:.\ ,.,.... .: '.'
:;\.\:.\'.;,:.......:
...... .. "
¡/\;,:::.' . ·.~·,~·:;·i>:.i..: .:::
'. ;; ",::.' .
'::>"""'.;';::<-;':::.:,'.;
:.'.',:.:.>,;;':,; :.':
'.:,'
. ,',.
'.,.
g
..,'".
City of Pickering
.. ..
..
. .
+
. .
..
.. .
i~../
+ ..
..
+ ..
+·.:+0
+ ..
..
+ ..
. +
..
.. ..
=>¡{
.. ..
..
.. ..
..
..
.. ..
...... (
.. ..
..
++...~
+ + +: otj
.. ..
.. ..
..
.. ..
..
.. ..
=:+v
.. ..
..
.... ~
'J, /
... .
'.. ..
.. ~\I
+~\\
~~.
..
,;,·.·.·;i,·0'~~·' ~+.~....., . '-.' ';':'..
"..'
::. ......;,
... .. .
'. " . ". ','" .
. .' . . . .
. .
. .'. '. ..".:.,'.
::i:-' ;,'-:,::;:....ÎI'
.. 'il
. ...... ...:(.~
. . .'. ..:. ..:.: .... ;':"'WI!
V·, .... ,'.' ............ '. ... ·.ii" '. '·:c\..>;'>L~i
/ ...... ...i}".;mJI
r. . '. ' .:.'<' ;};, '.. . : :"
i:' .....,'::.:. : .' ..:',.=::
". '. . "':' ....::;. '.;' ...:'.~:;
. ". '. .'., :...,. ". . ; '.. ....,.'
:, ' .:, ;,i i.' "" . ':\ ....: <-<.':
Ii:: .i .. : !:''':'':,;,,:, ..,':::':' ,<:
.:.;;". : :..,."{ :':<:'.. ,';'. :. ../¡
~ .......:\,:>" ..'.;:",..."':'.':;::;,(,-,
7 ;'. :,..:"", .,./'~:i~.'.');i~';'·: ;y.
/'::'.:"""'.::.,:-;:::. "':,,';'" ':"
10',·:, :.\,;;' ¡.....,...; ':'::'/" ,
'.'..,....::,":.: '.\,< '.".": .:.;\ .;\,.....
>::,;.;;.' (.'\'.;
:'¡/ .tl /~~~ >." ".'.'.
,:.,' .... ..; \'.,.,. .:'., .'.;;
,;: :'.";( . ':,'.'
I::' :<. ¡"" "oJ':':'·,';'
,'':'. ........:..
'.. \.', :./::,;.::'''::.:.:,
':'. .:,:...,......, ",' '!.<.
" :.\ : :::;0: ::'';':J >- ..:... /:
·.'c··,':." :.::
:::': '..'.'," ,.....,....:. -: .". ."
:' .i.';.<::·· ," <i":: :::::.:Y
i:j.:.. . ,:,,c::'<':.;:'..::>..:,
:' .,,'.':'. '. .."'\:,\':' '. " ;:.:.; .
t:H..\,.:'.:..::\'".:..·'...· ,
,:..,..::-).:' .... .,:,,;:;::;,:..;::
it . '''W, . i;:
.;: .... ·.·:\'i
::>:'..: ':' .>,.... "'. j"
Planning & Development Department
DATE JULY 25/05
..
; :
:.'.
. .
"
"
, .
.,....
'..
:1 '/ rmrm l/
t /CUi
..
OPEN SrACEsmt'EM BY.(AW JQ37 BAML£1'DUlCNlt.110NS
III ~TUAAL AREAS m ·CLRe-CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL' f2.2} HAMLET R£SICENTIAL
?~DESJGNA11ONS æ 'RU~AL AORICl.lt.TURt:' E::J ~:~~R~~Cy1.TE'"
. ACRICULTURAL AREAS
;-',' ~ HAMLET COMMtAC'At.
..~ RURAL STUD"" AREAS
~,.~t.f"þ""" In~ _~ncf tta .uPDße.... All rt.hte R_I'V!"f. Not ~_ ",..... or ."....."..
2005 ..~AC and ø.. JU_II.,., All rtcil"t1a ~. Not 0 DkI" of Su..-.
- -- NEW ROAD CONNECTIONS
_ (PROPOSED)
l) SI"ECIAI. INTEREST $rTE'
l'
DRAWN BY JB
CHECKED BY CP
SCALE NTS
PN-RUR
,iJ
, "g¡ -Ó.é;
, 3 'J
Co. ()
CUlf ()~
INFORMATION REPORT NO. 19-05
FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING OF
August 4, 2005
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC MEETING REQUIREMENTS
OF THE PLANNING ACT, R.S.O.1990, chapter P.13
SUBJECT:
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 17/05
Lakeland Associates Limited
3325 Highway No.7, Kinsale
(North Part of Lot 2, Concession 5)
1.0 PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
- the subject property is located on the south side of Highway No. 7 east of
Audley Road (see Location Map, Attachment #1);
- the subject property has an area of approximately 4.0 hectares, a lot frontage
of 80 metres, and currently supports a detached dwelling and accessory
structure;
- the surrounding land uses include residential to the east and west, and
agricultural to the north and south;
- a tributary of Lynde Creek traverses the southwestern portion of the subject
property.
2.0 APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL
- the applicant proposes to amend the zoning of the subject property to permit
a dog daycare and boarding facility with associated specialty retailing as
additional uses;
- the existing residential dwelling on the lot is to be maintained, and the
applicant is proposing to accommodate the specialty retailing use within a
portion of the dwelling;
- the existing barn located on the property is to be maintained and used as part
of the dog daycare and boarding facility, with the potential to re-construct a
new structure in the future;
Information Report No. 19-05
"L/
í-" 3if -Ph
Page 2
039
- a site plan showing the existing buildings on the property and the applicant's
proposal is provided for reference (see Applicant's Submitted Site Plan,
Attachment #2).
- the proposed dog daycare and boarding facility and speciality retailing are
proposed only on the portion of the subject property that is contained with the
boundary of the Hamlet of Kinsale (see Attachment #3);
3.0 OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING
3.1 Durham ReQional Official Plan
- identifies the subject property as being designated "Rural Settlements -
Hamlet" and "Major Open Space System";
- Rural Settlement areas permit the establishment of commercial, residential,
community and recreational uses;
- the predominant use of lands in the Major - Open Space System shall be
conservation, recreation, reforestation, agriculture and farm-related uses;
- the proposal appears to conform to the Durham Region Official Plan;
3.2 PickerinQ Official Plan
- identifies the northern portion of the subject property as being designated "Rural
Settlements - Rural Hamlets" and "Hamlet Residential" within the Kinsale
Settlement Area;
- the portion of the property not contained within the boundary of the Kinsale
Settlement Area is designated as "Open Space System - Natural Areas";
Rural Hamlet areas permit a variety of uses including residential,
employment, commercial, community, cultural and recreational uses;
- the Kinsale Settlement policies encourage opportunities for enhancing Kinsale
through general or site-specific zoning that permits arts and craft studios,
workshops and small-scale commercial enterprises on suitable sites, provided the
historic character of the village and the interests of neighbouring residents are
respected;
- Schedule II to the Pickering Official Plan - "Transportation System" identifies
the proposed future by-pass of a Type 'A' Arterial Road (Highway No.7)
through the southern portion of the property;
- Schedule III to the Pickering Official Plan - "Resource Management" identifies
the south-western portion of the subject property as being within a Shoreline
and Stream Corridor area;
(:40
~ Information Report No. 19-05
if...~~., 'i,,,..,.,,,,
PD...,,,,.,,,3':!:,:.r:b..
Page 3
3.3 ZoninQ By-law 3037
_ the subject property is dual zoned "CLR8" - Cluster Residential Zone on the
northern portion of the property, as amended by By-law 2623/87, and "A" - Rural
Agricultural Zone on the remaining portion, as zoned by Zoning By-law 3037
(see Attachment #3);
_ the "CLR8" zoning currently permits a detached residential dwelling, while the
"A" zoning permits agricultural uses and a residential detached dwelling;
_ a zoning by-law amendment is required to permit the proposed additional
uses on the portion of the property currently designated "CLR8".
4.0 GREENBELT PLAN
_ the southern portion of the subject property is designated "Protected
Countryside - Natural System" within the Greenbelt Plan;
_ as the proposed application does not apply to the portion of the subject
property within the Greenbelt Plan, the proposal complies with the Plan.
5.0 RESULTS OF CIRCULATION
5.1 Resident Comments
_ one resident comment has been received to date requesting additional
information;
5.2 Aaency Comments
- Veridian Connections - no objections;
5.3 Staff Comments
- in reviewing the application to date, the following matters have been identified
by staff for further review and consideration:
· ensuring that the proposed development is compatible with, and sensitive
to, surrounding lands;
· environmental impacts of possible pesticide use on the subject property;
· conformity with the Kinsale Settlement Area policies of the Official Plan;
· functioning of the site with regards to parking and ingress/egress from
Highway No.7;
· noise impacts on the surrounding properties;
· ensuring that changes of use for existing buildings meet all necessary fire
protection, health standards and building codes;
· compliance with the Provincial Policy Statement.
Information Report No. 19-05
,!J;~'~¡-;~Vi;~!,\¡'':' ':';f~ _. .'1"_
·;·:n¡:r:. 'i .:{i._....3.':i:ç¿f?
Page 4
C41
6.0 PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
- written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the
Planning & Development Department;
- oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting;
- all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report
prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent
meeting of Council or a Committee of Council;
- if you wish to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision, you must provide
comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this proposal;
- if you wish to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal, you
must request such in writing to the City Clerk.
7.0 OTHER INFORMATION
7.1 Appendix No. I
- list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City
Departments that have commented on the application at the time of writing
the report;
7.2 Information Received
- a copy of the applicant's submitted plan is available for viewing at the offices
of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
Carla Pierini
Planner II
Lynda Taylor, MCIP, RPP
Manager, Development Review
CP:ld
Attachments
Copy: Director, Planning & Development
(;42
.~~~.~~~, TC'
.....;ll:?l2....,. ....,...,
APPENDIX NO. I TO
INFORMATION REPORT NO. 19-05
COMMENTING RESIDENTS AND LANDOWNERS
(1) Mike Chen
COMMENTING AGENCIES
(1) Veridian Connections
COMMENTING CITY DEPARTMENTS
(1) Planning & Development Department
(2) Fire Services
¡f~TO
f Dn 3'1 -Œ)"
"'/.00'..-.... .,1_
(:4':)
,-,I II·)
Excerpts from
Statutory Public Information Meeting
Pursuant to the Planning Act
Minutes
Thursday, August 4, 2005
7:00 P.M.
The Manager, Development Review, provided an overview of the requirements of the
Planning Act and the Ontario Municipal Board respecting this meeting and matters
under consideration there at.
(II) ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 17/05
LAKELAND ASSOCIATES LIMITED
3325 HIGHWAY NO.7, KINSALE
¡NORTH PART OF LOT 2. CONCESSION 5)
1. Carla Pierini, Planner II, provided an overview of property location, applicant's
proposal and City's Official Plan policies pertaining to this site, as outlined in
Information Report #17/05.
2. Les Jagoda, Planning Agent for Lakeland Associates Limited, was present and
noted the following comments:
· the existing driveway will be cleaned up and used as the entrance and exit
from the site
· the garage and breezeway will be renovated for a boutique and a
welcome centre
. . the existing barn is to be maintained and renovated to include noise
attenuation, wall repair and insulation with the potential of constructing a
new structure in the future
· a fenced in area will be constructed for the dogs to run leash free
· the owner/operator lives on site
· this application conforms with most of the Regional and City policies
· zoning precedent has been set with the GM Dealership and the zoning on
the adjacent property allowing for a hotel
· neighbours have been approached to hear and address their concerns
· the Region has been consulted with respect to waste management
· the kennel and boutique are compatible with the present zoning which is
agricultural and commercial
· this application will not cause traffic congestion as seen at the Royal
Woods property
· consideration will be given to a landscape buffer for the neighbours
- 1 -
Ü4t!
CUlJ (!~
iI·~ì i\n.¡¡1,¡'r.:'NI".' i/. .5 -rO'
~.... "ht.;ì I'" L. ; rr 1
RE?OR'í Ii PD- 34 "Db
Excerpts from
Statutory Public Information Meeting
Pursuant to the Planning Act
Minutes
Thursday, August 4, 2005
7:00 P.M.
3. Chris Ward, Business Manager, advised that this is a facility where dogs can
run loose and not be crated unless requested by their owners. Dogs will
socialize with other dogs, which makes for a happier, healthier animal. An
orientation period occurs prior to the dog staying at this facility where the dog
meets other dogs to see it's comfort level.
4. Jeff Lalonde, shop owner in Kinsale, advised that this is a much-needed facility.
It provides dog owners with a comfort level knowing their dog is well cared for
and makes for a happier dog.
5. Rakesh Gupta, advised that he is purchasing property abutting the west side of
the property in question and is concerned with the possible noise. He
requested that consideration be given to moving the fenced in area to the east
of the barn rather than the west.
-2-
¡5,TT4CHMPJT # ~
.,....., ',"'" p -"I~ --,36'~'"t<':"~:::'·";):·
";'·':·';.~r-t,.f )"'., I .. c.....c:J
... . . , . ..y ··'~.",'C~'·'·· ','.. . ,"'''''''"'''''''_''',_ "_'._,""_' _
045
From:
Sent:
Mike Chen
Friday, July 22,200512:35 PM
Subject:
Notice of Public Meeting - Zoning By-law Amend. App - A17/05
Dear Ms. Bentlely,
On Monday July 18, 2005, I received the notice of the
public meeting to be held on Zoning By-law Amendment
Application - A17/05.
I'm writing to request:
1. Information Report available from the Clerk's
Office
2. To receive notice of future mseeting on this matter
3. Notification of the Passing of this Requested
Change of Zoning by-law
If the Information Report can be emailed to me that
would be preferred. Thank you.
I am considering appealing this decision. However, I
am reserving my comments until I receive the
information report and research the matter further.
Sincerely,
Mike Chen
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
1
·4'"'"
t~- .)
The Regional
Municipality
of Durham
Planning Department
605 ROSSLAND ROAD E
4TH FLOOR
PO BOX 623
WHITBY ON L 1 N 6A3
CANADA
905-668-7711
Fax: 905-666-6208
E-mail: planning@
region.durham.on.ca
www.region.durham.on.ca
A.L.Georgieff, MCIP, RPP
Commissioner of Planning
.-'
j\"1"'I"ACH rv~EnJT <11 7·,,1',
,.,-~~: _ ..')i, 1f....,.~,$;I,¡, ,~.....,~1."ii
,; Ç>D,3fI--.qþ
August 18,2005
Carla Pierini, Planner II
Pickering Civic Complex
One The Esplande
Pickering, Ontario
L 1V 6K7
Ms. Pierini:
Re: Zoning Amendment Application A17/05
Applicant: Les Jagoda, Lakehead Associates Ltd.
Owner: Christine Ward .
Location: 3325 Highway No. 7
South side of Highway No. .7; east of Audley Road
Municipality: City of Pickering
Thisapplicationhas been reviewed and the following comments are offered.
The purpose of this application is to amend the "CLR8" zonjng designation , on
the northern portion thesubject property to permIt adog daycare and boarding
facility with associated specialty retailing as an additional use.
Reaional Official Plan
The northern portion of the subject property is designated as "Hamlet" in the
Durham Regional Official Plan. Hamlets should be developed in harmony with
surrounding uses and may consist of commercial uses that meet the
immediate needs of the residents of the hamlets and surrounding rural area. .
The southern portion of the subject property is designated "Major Open Space"
in the Durham Regional Official Plan. The predominant uses of lands in the,
Major Open Space System are conservation, recreation, reforestati6nand
agricultuie and faiiii-ielated uses.
The proposed uses maybe permitted on the northern portion of the subject
property within the Hamlet designation.
ReQional Services
The subject property is presently serviced by a private well and private waste
disposal. The Regional Health Department indicated no concerns with
servicing.
N:\pimldclZoninglCommentslPickeringlA 17 ·OS.doc
@
100% Post Consumer
4 7 ,;
"~'"32i:Q6 '
047
Provincial Policies and Deleç¡ated Review Responsibilities
This application has bèen screened in accordance with the terms Ç>f the
provincial plan review responsibilities'. The subject property is adjacent to
Provincial Highway NO.7. Comments regarding site access should be
obtained from the Ministry of Transportation; There are no other matters of
, provincial interest applicable to this application.
If you have é¡iny questions or require further information, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Qmønw1
. . ' .....
Dwayne Campbell, Planner,
Current Operations Branch
Cc: Pete Castellan" Regional Works Dep.artment
, Gregg Law, Regional Health Department
N:lpimldc\ZoningICommenlsIPickeringlA 17 -OS.doc
U4R
,n "¡'¡""I\!¡'Ei~'i 4l 8 TO
ð;"'; ;....'hnIV ~,~ 1f,__..,~
';iEPORl' # PD__~:.o0
1"7_,,1
Ministry 0/'
Tranqlllrtation
Ministl!rl! deft
Tn n~ lnrts
®
Ontario
Pnone: (416) 23S~4572
Fax: (416) 235-4267
E-mail: hugh.fyffe@mto.gov.on.ca
R· r"C' ~~·V/ CD
, C ,¿;¡r,;~ 'II-
') ,,,, ?O'')\-
¡'l'" . ! I Ii'"'
J)L.. 1_; r_,~,1
Corridor ManagmIent Section
-th -1 :s 'ld' "D "
I .i:'.,oo.t" Ul" mg .
1201 Wilson Avenue
Downsview, Ontario
M3M lI8
CITY OF P1CKERING
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
July 26, 2005
Ms. Debi A. Bentley, CTO, CMM 111
City Clerk
City of Pickering
1 The Espl~ade
Pickering, Ontario, LIV 6K7
,Re: Notice of Public: Meeting - Zoning By-Law Amendment Application -. A17/0S
3325 Highway 7
Dear Ms. Berltley:
We have reviewed the above proposal and have no objection in principle, subject to the following
comments.
Prior to any construction being undertaken, ministry permits are required for any new building or structure
within 46m of the Highway 7 property line or within a 180m radius of one ofit's intersections. Ministry
permits are also røquired for all si;p:ls visible to the highway
This Min.ì.str.y will require a miDinlum 14m setback trom. the ministry's property limit, to any new
buildings/structures above and beJow ground. Further, no driveway (ajsle), building amenity
(e.g. loading dock) or operational arrangeme.nt vital to the viability of this proposal should be located
within the 14m. setback. In addition, any parking within the 14m setback must be surplus to the site
requirements and so noted on an eventual the Site Plan.
Further information on our permit requirements is available ftom our office by contacting Mr. Bryan
Porter, Pennits Officer, at (416-235-5559).
ce.
Hugh Fe.
Corridor Management
~ . .
,.:. ... tiK'S DIVISION
FILE NO.: R /7 / ().!::J
FORWARD COpy TO:
MAYOR INFO. SYSTEMS
COUNCIL LEGAL SERVICES
CAO LIBRARY
BY-LAW MUN. PROP. & ENG. V
CORP. SERVICES OPERATIONS ".
CULTURE & REC. PLANNING a DE\f. V
CUST. CARE PROJ.& POL.
ECON. DEVEL. SUPPLY & SERVo
FIRE
HUMAN RES.
Ii' c..~.,,:".,+.,,"'=..:. C
iIJf', , -;;(,¡ -c..J:^;
.41 ~.L¡ ......,.....,_·....J"':::l::....~,...~~"·"..,.,,,·,.,·
04H
Central
Lake Ontario
Conservation
100 Whiting Avenue
Oshawa, Ontario
L 1 H 3T3
Tel: (905) 579-0411
Fax: (905) 579-0994
Member of Conservation Ontario
fõ1~ ~ ~ 0 \\# [Erñì
lfù AUG 0 5 Z005 li))
Web: www.cloca.com
Email: mail@c/oca.com
August 2, 2005
CITY OF PICKERING
PICKERING, ONTARIO
.~ E- "" C'Q i~' ~ \' f' 1iF'" ['''''''
h:: ! .t1i¡:! M "/ fC:: ~
The Corporation of the City of Pickering
Planning Department
One the Esplanade
Pickering, ON Ll V 5K7
Ú,UG
!~ 7nn¡~
,) !.. \I \J..J
CITY OF PICKERING
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
Attention: Carla Pierini
Dear Madam:
Subject:
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A-17/05
Christine WardlLakeland Associates Ltd.
3325 Highway No.7
Part Lot 02, Concession 05
City of Pickering
Authority File No.: Al7/05, CLOCA IMS No.: PZOG1474
Purpose of Application:
To amend the zoning of the subject property to permit a dog daycare and boarding facility with
associated specialty retailing as additional uses.
Authority staff has reviewed the subject application, and while the property is crossed by a
tributary of Lynde Creek with it's associated flood plain (see attached airphoto), the proposed
use is shown as being situated closer to Highway 7 and well removed from the hazard lands.
Therefore we have no objections to the application.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment in this matter.
Mat we do on the land is mirrored in the water
@
16
34 -9þ
051
Fire Department
comments
Dated:
Cß.ç~J{eatli
Pi"e (jJrevention Office"
œicÆgring Pi"e Services
Understanding the applicant may want to change the
existing single family residential dwelling and existing barn
into a dog daycare, boarding facility and associated
speciality retailing area, it may facilitate a review from a
professional architect/engineer or both to address a
"change of use" under the requirements/provisions of the
Ontario Building Code.
Electrical Inspections; Given the age of the building, the
Pickering Fire Service requests that a complete inspection
be conducted on the main electrical panel and wiring detail
of the structures on the property.
Heating, Ventilating, Air Conditioning systems; As above,
the Pickering Fire Service requests that the services of a
qualified contractor be obtained to conduct a. complete
inspection on the heating, ventilating, and air conditioning
systems to ensure they are working as not to create a
hazard for the occupants of the buildings.
Obtain the services of a structural engineer to ensure that
the outbuilding/barn is structurally sound prior to
occupancy.
April 3, 2006
,.. r.:: ..¡
LJJ{~C
ill¡ ()~
REPORT TO
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Report Number: OES 23-06
Date: May 23, 2006
From:
Everett Buntsma
Director, Operations & Emergency Services
Subject:
Traffic concerns - Rougemount Drive (south of Toynevale Road)
File: A-2130
Recommendation:
1. That Report OES 23-06 regarding traffic operational concerns on Rougemount
Drive be received; and
2. That All-Way Stop Controls not be installed at the intersection of Rougemount
Drive at Pine Ridge Drive: and
3. That staff be directed to initiate the traffic operational improvements as identified
in this report.
Executive Summary: As a result of a recent motor vehicle collision, City staff were
asked to investigate traffic operations on Rougemount Drive (south of Toynvale Road)
and determine if All-Way Stop controls could be installed at the intersection of
Rougemount Drive and Pine Ridge Road to curb vehicular speeding.
Having completed the review, staff determined that municipal warrants for All-Way Stop
Controls are not met and their consequent use would contravene the City's "Safer
Street Traffic Management Strategy" as adopted by Council. As the review also
identified several potential roadway improvements, staff recommend that All-Way Stop
controls not be installed but that the City proceed with the various roadway driver
guidance initiatives as identified in this report.
Financial Implications: The cost for the acquisition and installation of the proposed
driver guidance improvements is estimated at $2500. The cost of All-Way stop controls
and associated advance warning signs would be an additional $400.00. The cost of all
works can be accommodated within the 2006 Roads Current Budget.
053
Report OES 23-06
Date: May 23, 2006
Subject: Traffic concerns
Rougemount Drive (south of Toynevale Road)
Page 2
Background: Recently, as a result of a dramatic late night motor vehicle collision on
Rougemount Drive (south of Pine Ridge Drive) staff were asked by area residents and
Ward 1 Councillors to initiate a review of the traffic controls along Rougemount Drive
and determine if All-Way Stop controls were justified at the intersection of Rougemount
Drive at Pine Ridge Drive. The residents alleged that numerous vehicular accidents
were occurring on an ongoing basis due to vehicular speeding and felt that something
should be done to address the problem.
Having completed the review, the following results were obtained:
Rougemount Drive
Pine Ridge Drive
Classification:
Daily Volume:
Peak Hr. Volume (time):
85%-ile Speed:
Legal Posted Speed:
Collector
1450 vehicles
86 vehicles (5-6pm)
56.8 km/hr
40 km/hr
Local
116 vehicles
14 vehicles(10-11 am)
N/A
40 km/hr
Collision records show that typically one reported collision per year occurs along
Rougemount Drive and that no specific location is consistently identified as being
problematic. However, residents claim that several unreported loss of control
incidents occur each year in the vicinity of the bends due to speeding.
In 2003, Council adopted the Safer Streets Traffic Management Strategy to address
roadway operational concerns such as those from the Rougemount Drive community.
Adopting municipal criteria, the document lowered the threshold requirements for AII-
Way Stop controls from the Provincial warrants previously used by staff. It also
established various programs to address speeding (typically the most common
complaint). Consequently, due to Council's continued endorsement of the Strategy
principals, the City has maintained a halt on the number of unwarranted All-Way Stop
controls.
The All-Way Stop Justification study results indicate:
· that there is insufficient vehicular volumes along both Pine Ridge Drive and
Rougemount Drive to warrant a stop
· that stopping sight distances are sufficient
· and that there is less than 3 reportable right angle collisions per year
therefore municipal warrants for All-Way Stop Controls along Rougemount Drive are
not met. Should All-Way Stop controls be installed at that intersection, staff caution
that a majority of drivers would likely be noncompliant given the isolated nature of the
area; they are local residents familiar with the area; and the likelihood of not
encountering opposing traffic (at the intersection) dictating a need to stop.
CORP0227-07/01 revised
054
Report OES 23-06
Date: May 23, 2006
Subject: Traffic concerns
Rougemount Drive (south of Toynevale Road)
Page 3
However, having completed the on site review, staff have identified several deficiencies
and recommend the following improvements:
· revisions to the Curve Ahead warning signs
· addition of Cautionary advisory speed limit signs prior to the bends
· installation of additional Chevrons to meet OTM guidelines
· relocation of the Regulatory Speed limit signs (away from the bends)
· renewal of edgeline paint to provide driver guidance
Attached is a sketch which identifies both the existing area controls and the changes
proposed.
Attachments:
1. Proposed improvements sketch
MP:nw
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering City .Cou cil
,. ,-.I
CORP0227-07/01 revised
C /~.- ,
-~/Æ /
EveretiBüntsma
Director, Operations & Emergency Services
,1
o(
I
REPORT "#
ðGS ~3··00
/ I"
055
-
:---
Shown Feb 24. 2006
Rougemount Drive
OPERATIONS & EMERGENCY
SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL Pf'{OP£HTY ð.
E.liG.INEERING DIVISION
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Ç"i2C~;:) DES r"ò',;,;Xf..)5'í> ~'4;~~1 ë'Q",,;,o ;;:400 I.X::1 O~j:5 C,Y1O:;'.:'ln~i:"'J'-':J';': T"·;."·' ~'I' ..::r an; ;"\<~;ejfi'},'d O[)~ßloUi)J{T :.:.:0<
U1r.:: R
~ . Lift¡ ()~
REPORT TO
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Report Number: OES 24-06
Date: May 23, 2006
From:
Everett Buntsma
Director, Operations & Emergency Services
Subject:
Quotation No. Q-25-2006 for Road Improvements on
Belinda Court, Orion Court & Bonita Avenue
File: A-2130
Recommendation:
1. That Report OES-24-06 regarding Road Improvements on Belinda Court, Orion
Court & Bonita Avenue be received; and that:
2. Quotation Q-25-2006 submitted by Serve Construction Limited for Road
Improvements on Belinda Court, Orion Court & Bonita Avenue in the amount of
$104,522.95 (GST included) be accepted; and that
3. The total gross project cost of $107,000 (GST included) and a net project cost of
$100,000 including the above quotation amount and other project costs identified
in this report be approved; and that
4. The appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take necessary action
to bring effect thereto.
Executive Summary: As part of the 2006 Roads Capital Budget, Road
Improvements on Belinda Court, Orion Court & Bonita Avenue were approved as road
rehabilitation projects. These projects are to be funded using a component of the 2005
Federal Gas Tax Funds. Quotation Q-25-2006 was called on Thursday, May 4, 2006
and closed on Friday, May 12, 2006 with five (5) bidders responding.
The total gross project cost is estimated to be $107,000 for an estimated net cost to the
City of $100,000 (net of GST rebate). Staff have been directed to report to Council on
results of this quotation call and financing in order to proceed with this project in a
timely manner.
Report DES 24-06
05'7
May 23, 2006
Subject: Quotation No. Q-25-2006 for Road Improvements on
Belinda Court, Orion Court & Bonita Avenue
File: A-2130
Page 2
Financial Implications:
1.
TENDER AMOUNT
Q-25-2006
GST
Sub-Total
GST Rebate
Total
$97,685.00
6,837.95
104,522.95
(6.837.95)
$97,685.00
2.
APPROVED SOURCE OF FUNDS
Roads Ca ital Bud et
Location Account Project Source of Funds Budqet Required
Code
Belinda Court 5320.0621.6250 Federal Gas Tax 40,000 57,865
Reserve Fund
Orion Court 5320.0620.6250 30,000 37,820
Bonita Avenue 5320.0622.6250 30,000 4,315
FUNDS AVAILABLE 100,000 100,000
3.
ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTING SUMMARY
Q-25-2006 -Quotation for Road Improvements on
Belinda Court, Orion Court & Bonita Avenue.
$97,685
Associated Costs
Materials Testing
Miscellaneous Costs
Construction Contingency
Total
GST
Total Gross Project Cost
GST Rebate
Total Net Project Cost
500
1,000
815
$100,000
7.000
107,000
(7,000)
$100,000
058
Report OES 24-06
May 23,2006
Subject: Quotation No. Q-25-2006 for Road Improvements on
Belinda Court, Orion Court & Bonita Avenue
File: A-2130
Page 3
4.
Project Cost under (over) Approved Funds
nil
The Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer has reviewed the budgetary implications
and the financing of the expenditures contained in this report and concurs.
Background: As part of the Roads Capital 2006 Budget, Road Improvements on
Belinda Court, Orion Court and Bonita Avenue were identified as a road rehabilitation
projects. Originally Bonita Avenue was budgeted for in 2006 for a full asphalt
resurfacing project. Upon further review of concerns over a settlement in the existing
roadway senior staff determine that the best course of action would be to repair the
settlement and monitor the situation over the next few years. Prior to investing into full
resurfacing of the road. Quotation Q-25-2006 was issued on Thursday, May 4, 2006
and closed on Friday, May 12, 2006 with five (5) bidders responding. The total gross
project cost is estimated to be $107,000 for an estimated net cost to the City of
$100,000 (net of GST rebate). Serve Construction Limited has previously worked for
the City on Tender T-1-2004 Playground Construction and are deemed acceptable by
the Supervisor, Engineering & Capital Works. The Health & Safety Policy, current Cost
and Frequency Record, Certificate of Clearance issued by Workplace Safety &
Insurance Board, and Certificate of Insurance as submitted by Serve Construction
Limited have been reviewed by the Coordinator, Safety & Employee Development and
are deemed acceptable in conjunction with staff's review of previous work experience
with the City and the bonding available on this project, the information is deemed
acceptable.
Upon careful examination of all quotations, and relevant documents received, the
Operations & Emergency Services Department, Municipal Property & Engineering
Division recommends the acceptance of the low bid submitted by Serve Construction
Limited for Quotation Q-25-2006 in the amount of $104,522.95 (GST included) and that
the total net project cost of $100,000 be approved.
This report has been prepared in conjunction with the Manager, Supply & Services who
concurs with the foregoing.
Attachments:
1 . Location Map
2. Supply & Services Memorandum
059
Report OES 24-06
May 23, 2006
Subject: Quotation No. Q-25-2006 for Road Improvements on
Belinda Court, Orion Court & Bonita Avenue
File: A-2130
Page 4
Prepared By:
Approved I Endorsed B,:
~~
() .
arrell B. Selsky . . .
Supervisor, Engineering & Capital Works
Everett B sma
Director, Operations & Emergency Services
.ß" ;7
/' ~.._ /..f
.,.....,.."'". (,;r? ~~,_s:;;?....._.~
Gillis A. Paterson
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
Vera A. Felgemacher
Manager, Supply & Services
DS:nw
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering Cit C
,-1
OGO
CiÚ¡ 0#
!.
/ it'REPORT#--º.£:..S .;;li/-{) C,
I...L__
MUNICIPAL PROPERTY & ENGINEERING
Attachment For Quotation Q-25-2006
BELINDA COURT, ORION COURT & BONITA AVENUE
I-
0::
U BONITA
UNA )
~ []¡ \'vVOOD~UFF ~ [~
o ~ L¡J I -10 ~ 2 AVENUE S
CL CL U Z ~\ \~ w tn <t ·1
~ ~ W CRI C \ ~Jì / ~. ~ I
8 0 U CL i- <'-, \ v 0::
tn ~i l~\ ~0S~~ j l STROUDS LANE I i
l)\ \ \ ( 0° --~- -~~
\ \ \1- vV- __ -
\ J, ~\// ~ WINGARDEN \:
\ ~ J CRESCENT
\,-~ /' I ~l I
~'\HEDGE~OJ¡ ~w CJ
Z =:) [ (j» \ c
(f) <t ~ º 0 P LAC E I ~ ~ \ 2
W ~ =:) 0:: U 0 l1J )\TI
~::J go <t~; ~ 'J>
- w 1.1 0 '-' I I- ")J S
I m ~ '\ .. CLt ~ (j) Ô ---\ ~
5: W 0 SUBJECT ::Lz CL ~ I C) w
> 0 AREA <t (j) LL Z ~
0:: ~ m li CL
o ~6 ~I <t
AVENUE
o
o
o
s>-
z<t
OS
U
I~
o
<t
o
0:::
LOCA nON MAP
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION INCLUDES:
Resurfacing of existing asphalt on Belinda Court, Orion Court
Asphalt repair for settlements on Bonita A venue
,/
.....-
REPORT# ûE') .;2tj. -00
""2-
061
/
CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
SUPPLY & SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
May 12, 2006
To: Richard Holborn
Division Head
Municipal Property & Engineering
Darrell Selsky
Supervisor,
Engineering & Capital Works
From: Barbara Tran
Buyer
RE: Quotation No. Q-25-2006
Road Improvements on Belinda Court,
Orion Court & Bonita Avenue
Closing: Friday, May 12,2006, before 12:00 Noon
Quotations were invited from nine (9) companies on May 4, 2006 of which five
(5) have responded by the closing date and time. Quotations shall be
irrevocable for 60 days after the official closing date and time.
SUMMARY
PST Included / GST Included
A copy of the quotations are attached for your review along with the following
summary of costs:
Bidder Bid Agreement to
Bond
Serve Construction Ltd. $104,522.95 YES
Aurostar Inc. $111,429.80 YES
D. Crupi & Sons $128,999.20 YES
Miller Paving Limited $132,816.83 YES
Mopal Construction Limited $146,590.00 YES
062
, ,
.:")
!\!< þ/ ';OREPORT#
..Âç,¡~~
OES :)J-I~
Richard Holborn / Darrell Selsky
May 12, 2006
Page 2
Serve Construction Ltd. has submitted the low bid. Please advise as soon as
possible, if the quotation submitted by Serve Construction Ltd. will be
considered in order that documentation as specified in Supplementary Standard
Conditions Item 11 can be received and reviewed during the evaluation phase
of the quotation call.
A Dun & Bradstreet report for Serve Construction Ltd. will be requested of the
Purchasing Analyst and a summary will be provided to you during the evaluation
phase of this quotation call.
A formal quotation award exceeding $81,000, in accordance with the 2006 CPI
Purchasing Policy adjustment, Item 04.05, is subject to Council approval. An
approved on-line requisition will also be required.
If you require further information, please feel free to contact me.
Barbara Tran
/bt
Attachment
cc. Construction Coordinator/lnspector
CiÚI ()~
063
REPORT TO
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Report Number: CS 25-06
Date: May 23, 2006
From:
Gillis A. Paterson
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
Subject:
Development Charges Reserve Fund - Statement of the Treasurer for
2005
Recommendation:
That Report CS 25-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer respecting the
Development Charges Reserve Fund be received and forwarded to Council for
information.
Executive Summary: Not applicable
Financial Implications: There are no financial implications to the receipt of this
statement.
Background: Section 43 of the Development Charges Act (Act) requires that the
Treasurer furnish to Council a Statement in respect of each Reserve Fund (i.e. for each
Development Charge) established under Section 33 of the Act. Accordingly, the
enclosed Attachments 1 to 6 details the activity in the Development Charges Reserve
Fund for the year ended December 31, 2005 in the manner as prescribed by the
Development Charges Act. As required under Section 43(3) of the Act, the Treasurer
will be forwarding a copy of this same Statement to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and
Housing within 60 days upon furnishing the Statement to the Council.
Funds are not transferred out of the Reserve Fund for projects until the funds are
actually needed, as required under accounting rules which ensures that the Reserve
Fund continues to earn interest income on these unspent monies until such time that
the actual expense is incurred. Attachment 1 presents the total Reserve Fund balance,
before unspent commitments of $21,135,306. Taking into account the unspent
commitments at December 31, 2005 of $3,583,520 the uncommitted fund balance
available for future expenditures is $17,551,786.
The development charges collected in 2005 were $1,672,209 a decrease of 54% from
amounts collected in 2004. Despite an economic condition of low interest rates and a
booming building industry, there is a decrease in the amount collected due to a
064
Report CS 25-06
Date: May 23,2006
Subject: Development Charges Reserve Fund-Statement
of the Treasurer for 2005
Page 2
decrease in building activities. The decrease in building activities was in part due to the
limited land available for development in Pickering. Attachment 2 provides a chart
showing the 10-year historical pattern of the development charges collected, notably
the sharp decline in 2005 from those collected in 2004 due to the point mentioned
above. The cumulative total collected for this 1 O-year period was $27,183,780.
The 2005 budgeted funding from this Reserve Fund was $1,623,260 as detailed on
Attachment 3.
The capital and current expenditures actually incurred in 2005 that were funded from
this Reserve Fund amounted to $687,308 (see Attachment 4). These expenditures
pertained to capital projects and studies approved in 2003 to 2005. Attachment 4
provides a summary by projects of these capital expenditures funded by development
charges and other sources as prescribed by a.Reg. 82/98 Section 12(3).
In 2005, the City undertook additional internal loans of $287,000 from this Reserve
Fund. Attachment 5 provides detailed information on the 2005 internal borrowings and
the purpose for which it was borrowed as prescribed by a.Reg. 82/98 Section 12(2)3.
Interest and principal repayments on 2005 internal loans will commence in 2006. As of
December 31, 2005, the combined total outstanding internal loans undertaken from
2001 to 2005 are $5,071,734 (see Attachment 6).
Please note that the principal and interest of $1,187,814 paid in 2005 and as indicated
in Attachment 6 are related to 2001 to 2004 internal loans. This amount was funded
from the general tax levy. This Attachment also provides a summary of amount and
source of any money used by the municipality to repay money borrowed from the fund
and interest on such money as required by a.Reg. 82/98 Section 12(2)4,5.
Caution has to be used when budgeting for draws for capital projects due to the limited
availability of land in Pickering and the uncertainty of economic times ahead of us.
Attachments:
1. 2005 Annual Statement of Development Charges Reserve Fund
2. Development Charges Collected 1995 -2005
3. Projects Approved in 2005 Capital Budget to be Funded from Development
Charges Reserve Fund
4. 2005 Actual Capital Expenditures Summarized by Projects
5. 2005 Internal Loans from Development Charges Reserve Fund-New Loans
Undertaken During the Year
6. Total Development Charges Reserve Fund Internal Loans - Annual Repayment
for the Year Ended December 31,2005
Report CS 25-06
Date: May 23, 2006
065
Subject: Development Charges Reserve Fund-Statement
of the Treasurer for 2005
Page 3
Prepared By:
Approved I Endorsed By:
Caryn Kong
Senior Financial Analyst
--=:? Od,/;? ::-c
~~ .~- -:::--::.>
<3IlIis A. Paterson
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
R~~-
GP:ck
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering City Council
~
¡¿-
,1
U6G
iã
Õ
I-
oð
~g¡
ca;::;
... .-
.0=
.- U
..J III
II..
I: UI
o CÞ
~ª
f 'u
U III
~u..
ë
'gË=
III C.l!!fh
~Ol-
lII'ãioð
Q. ~
o
- g¡
.~ u
I!!:E
I-~
...-
cþ I:
'Iâ cþ
3: ~
E g'
,g æ
I/)::i
"C
UI cþ
-gŠ
o cþ
111::111::
oð
c.
'S
tT
oðW
Uloð
i!! .!!! g¡
Ü::=Ufh
~:E
u..~
-
I:
Ë"Cg¡
C. cþ .-
O'lâ"Cfh
'ãi'ãi.a
>111::1/)
cþ
o
UI
iã
"¡: fß-
2
III
::i
fh
fh
fh
fh
fh
......
......
......
«5
0:>
~
'"
.....
.....
......
q
N
10
0:>
0:>
N
cxS
o
.....
«5
o
N
~
.....
ID.
(')
~
M
o
(')
~
.....
0:>
M
0:>
(')
o
~
.....
IÒ
ID
cxS
0:>
<0
0:>
..¡
(')
"l
0;
o
cxS
o
~
It)
o
o
N
..:
é
III
..,
'Iâ
UI
III
cþ
U
I:
III
iã
aJ
é
cþ
c.
o
U)
W
::J
Z
W
>
W
0:::
O:><OOO~"""
~¡EJ~~~
N'r-:LÒÒLÒ
t'--T-.....C\lN
<0 N~(')
. N'
......0
o
0:>
N'
......
10 0
<0
......
..¡
......
N
<O<ONO~
(')<ON......O:>
.....NOO......O:>
..¡r-:"":"¡M
0:::>..........('1)1{)
..... N
......0
10
<0
IÒ
<0
~o
00
......
..¡
(')
.....0
N
......
M
......
0:>
(') 0
0:>
.....
Ò
10
<00
~
o
«5
.....
u
Q)
>
.~ Q)
Q) ~
a:: ð
UI en
~.9
IOu
oCQ)_+",
UE(/)en
>.a~~
a>Q).BJ!:?
oa::EE
(')~~
<O~"'"
......NO:>
LÒ":'"
.....00
NO:><O
<00(')
1000.....
r-: ."¡
<0(')......
.....~
NOO:>
<0<0......
(')1010
M«5LÒ
......
......0.....
1t)0~
(')10<0
"¡cxSr-:
~
0:>(')(')
000.....
NO:>O:>
LÒLÒ"¡
0:>0010
""'C\I,.
O:>N~
......NO:>
O:>.....N
«5MÒ
......(')0
.....
~<O<O
.....0<0
1000(')
"¡cxS",
N
J!J
I:
Q)
en E
c:1ií
ro Q)
o >
...JE
roro
E c:
.æ.æ
Edj
-6-0
Q) Q)
> >
.~ .~
cþ Q)
a:: a::
-TTACHMENT#LTOREPORT# C:S~· D"
-
éÕow
o 0
(') (')
r-: r-:
00 00
~ 52.
000
NON
N N
<0 <0
ct ~
000
000
mom
N N
e?. e?.
roo co
...... ......
...... ......
cxS cxS
...... ......
~ ~
000
mom
...... ......
0:> 0:>
~ ct
U) en
W ~
0:::2
::J'C
I- :¡¡
is ~
zw
w:¡g
11. 'ã.
>< 10
WU
en
~
2
'C
c:
Q)
c.
x
W
:¡g
o
I-
<0
o
(')
LÒ
(')
.....
.....
N
10
00
0:>
Ò
ID
(')
.....
00
cxS
......
10
«5
~
.....
(')
LÒ
<0
~
N
<0
10
'"
......
(')
<0
N
<0
Ò
~
~
10
......
C\I,.
.....
0:>
.....
'"
(')
<0
N
IÒ
(')
~
00
<0
~
M
(')
~
::J
~
J!!
I:
cþ
E
-
'Ë
E
Q
o
"C
¡¡;
C.
I:
::)
f
.2
cþ
.0
iã
aJ
"C
I:
:::I
II..
Ô
N
10
M
00
10
ct
<0
00
.......
u;
10
r-:
.....
o
10
00
0:>
Ò
.....
<0
íõ
N
00
M
~
10
00
0:>
..¡
0:>
~
«5
o ~
.....
(')
LÒ
<0
~
o
N
<0
10
'"
......
(')
~
.....
o
N
cxS
00
~
íÕ
......
10
r-:
~
Ô
N
<0
'"
0:>
0:>
~
10
10
~
.....
0:>
.....
«5
o
(')
<0
N
LÒ
(')
<0.
~
.....
......
00.
.....
~
......
0:>
"l
.....
N
~
10
o
o
N
It)
o
o
N
.....
(')
o
Q)
o
i¡:j
en
10
en
"E
Q)
.§
1~
E
o
U
u
ïã
c.
c:
::J
......
(')
d
Q)
o
1¡j
UI
III
cþ
U
I:
co
iã
aJ
"C
~
'Ë
E
o
U
I:
::)
06'7
ATTACHMEI\JT#L TOREPORT#..Ç~.·,JS-~ ù~
~
0)
~
U
0)
~
~
o
U
oolr)
0)0
bI)0
aN
~I
Ulr)
~O\
~O\
(])~
S
~
o
~
0)
>
0)
Q
QJ
~
~
,J:
00.
íLJ.
.
~
......
.~
u
~
Q Q
Q Q
Q Q
'" '"
Q Q
Q Q
Q (()
'" '"
~ rf")
f.A-
Q Q Q Q Q
Q Q Q Q Q
Q Q Q Q Q
..... ..... .... ..... .....
Q Q Q Q Q
Q Q Q Q Q
Q (() Q (() Q
..... ..... ..... ..... ....
rf") M M ~ ~
Q
Q
Q
'"
Q
Q
(()
(()
Q
Q
M
rf")
Q
Q
M
~
Q
Q
M
0'\
0'\
0'\
~
Q
J..
~
QJ
~
t'
0'\
0'\
~
(()
0'\
0'\
~
1"168
ATTACHMENl fI..ct.",_ T( REPORT#£~_~Ç'o(,
Source of Funding Dev. Charge Gen. D.C-City's Other Total
Reserve Fund Fund Share Reserve Revenue
Projects:
External Subdivision (Road Construction)
Finch Ave-Brock Road 5321.0501. $146,810 $440,440 $ 587,250
Finch Ave-East Petticoat Cree 5321.0502. 75,000 75,000 150,000
Sideline 4 adj. 18T-88059 5321.0503. 12,500 37,500 54,590 104,590
Various Infill Developments 5321.0504 50,000 50,000 100,000
Woodview Ave-Hdyro Corridor 5321.0505 97,875 97,875 195,750
Woodview Ave-Finch Av 5321.0506 476,325 476,325 952,650
Rosebank Road Bridge 5321.0507 87,500 262,500 350,000
$946,010 $0 $1,439,640 $54,590 $ 2,440,240
External Subdivision ( Sidewalks & Streetlights)
Brock/Kingston Rd-Hwy 401 5321.0508 $ 58,500 $ 175,500 $ 234,000
Brock/Pickering Pkwy-Hwy 40' 5321.0509 58,500 58,500 117,000
Kingston/Fairport-CNR tracks 5321.0510 81,900 81,900 163,800
Kingston/Dixie-CNR tracks 5321.0511 40,950 40,950 81,900
Kingston/Bainbridge-Notion Rc 5321.0512 55,250 55,250 110,500
Kingston/Glendale-Walnut Lar 5321.0513 64,350 64,350 128,700
Finch Ave/Rosebank-18T-870! 5321.0514 52,650 52,650 105,300
Finch Ave/Royal Rd-Guild Roe 5321.0515 11,700 35,100 46,800
Sidewalk
401 Pedestrian Bridge 5323.0501 30,000 270,000 300,000
$ 453,800 $ 834,200 $ 1,288,000
External Subdivision ( Storm Water Management)
Storm Water Mgmt Works 5321.0516 136,000 24,000 160,000
$ 136,000 $ 24,000 $ 160,000
Culture & Recreation
Senior Centre 5701.0503 87,450 187,550 275,000
$ 87,450 $ 187,550 $ 275,000
Total $1,623,260 $0 $2,485,390 $54,590 $4,163,240
ATTACHMEN
.. Lf
~.; EPORT # _(} :) S'" ' ù"
r'6~
-' ,.
Dev. Charges D.C-City's Share
Reserve Fund Reserve Total
Corporate Services
2003 & 2004 budQeted proiect
Development Charges Background Study $ 3,979 $ 3,979
Total Corporate Services $ 3,979 $ 3,979
External Subdivision
2004 budaeted proiects
Road Construction:
Rosebank Rd. Bridge with CNR $ 69,953 $ 729,023 $ 798,976
Clements Rd east limit Church St 36,834 36,834 73,668
Church StlBayly to Clements Road 332,608 332,608 665,216
Traffic SiQnal:
Brock Rd at Clements Road 56,250 26,250.00 82,500
Storm Water ManaQement
Finch Ave.! East of Brock 929 164 1,093
Total Ext. Subdivision Works-2004 $ 496,574 $ 1 ,124,879 $ 1,621,453
2005 budQeted projects
Road Construction:
Finch Ave/Brock Road to 450m East $ 93,378 $ 280,140 $ 373,518
Rosebank Rd Bridge with CNR tracks 81,687 245,062 326,750
Sidewalks & Streetliahts
Finch Ave.!Royal Rd west to Guild Road 5,254 15,762 21,015
Total Ext. Subdivision Works- 2005 $ 180,319 $ 540,964 $ 721,283
Sidewalks
401 Pedestrian Bridge-GO Station $ 2,814 $ 25,326 28,140
Culture & Recreation
Senior Centre-2nd Floor Design 3,622 7,767 11,389
Total-Sidewalk & Culture & Recreation-2005 $ 6,436 $ 33,093 39,529
Total Spent $ 687,308 $ 1,698,936 $ 2,386,244
Ü70
ATTACHMEN~ tf _::5" (. REPORT # C5 ,J $'- fJ'
Budget Amount
Year Project Number Terms Description of Loans
Roads
2004 04-2320-004-00 5-yr Telescopic Boom Excavator $ 50,000
5320.0401.0000 3.73% Gradall Model 4100
Also Ext. Debt $288,000
Library
2005 05-2745-005-01 5-yr Upgrade to library automation system 172,000
5800.0518.0000 3.73%
Parks
2005 05-2718-002-01 5-yr Two One-ton Dump Trucks 65,000
05-2718-002-02 3.73%
5780.0501/0502
Total Internal Loans for 2005 $ 287,000
Internal loans to be funded by Development Charges Reserve Fund, repayment commencing
in 2006.
ff_~, ro REPORT#...Q.;l<)-ù,
07 'J
Outstanding Principal Outstanding
Principal Repayment Principal Interest
(Jan 1) 2005 2005 2005
Jan.1, 2005 Dec. 31,2005
$ $ $ $
Development Charges
Booked in 2001
Rosebank Road 599,282 (91,151) 508,131 (21,933)
Eastshore Community Ctr 520,044 (79,099) 440,945 (19,033)
Fire Tanker 105,873 (16,103) 89,770 (3,875)
Dispatch Ctr 116,527 (116,527) 0 0
1999 Roads Projects 622,589 (94,695) 527,894 (22,786)
1999 Streetlights 380,211 (71,202) 309,009 (13,916)
2000 Roads Projects 554,668 (84,365) 470,303 (20,301 )
Aerial Truck 266,348 (40,511 ) 225,837 (9,748)
Waterfront Trail 39,257 (39,257) 0 0
Library-Western Branch 941,539 (143,208) 798,331 (34,460)
4,146,338 (776,118) 3,370,220 (146,052)
Booked in 2002
Fire Hall & Communication 27,120 (8,718) 18,402 (993 )
Parks 130,572 (13,998) 116,573 (5,690)
Sidewalks 65,706 (7,044) 58,662 (2,864 )
Storm Water Management 134,783 (37,035) 97,748 (5,890)
Streetlight 33,696 (3,612) 30,084 (1,468)
Arena & Recreation 46,332 (4,967) 41,365 (2,019)
Roads 583,777 (62,585) 521,192 (25,441 )
1,021,985 (137,959) 884,026 (44,365)
Booked in 2003
Roads 92,562 (8,624 ) 83,938 (4,034)
Library 222,083 (20,693) 201,390 (9,678)
Rec.Complex-Core 6,931 (646) 6,285 (302)
321,576 (29,963) 291,613 (14,014)
Booked in 2004
Parks 175,000 (14,346) 160,654 (7,627)
Roads 60,000 (11,156) 48,844 (2,196)
Streetlights 32,000 (2,623) 29,377 (1,395)
267,000 (28,125) 238,875 (11,218)
Booked in 2005
Roads 50,000 50,000
Library 172,000 172,000
Parks 65,000 65,000
287,000 287,000
Total 6,043,899 (972,165) 5,071,734 (215,649)
. .
Source of Funding Gen. Tax Levy Gen. Tax Levy
Annual Charges (Principal & Interest) (1,187,814)
C'lt?,)
. (.~
REPORT TO
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Report Number: CS 29-06
Date: May 23, 2006
From:
Gillis A. Paterson
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
Subject:
Development Charges - Annual Indexing
Recommendation:
1. It is recommended that Report CS 29-06 of the Director, Corporate Services &
Treasurer be received and:
2. That effective July 1, 2006 as provided for in Section 16 of By-law 6349/04, the
Development Charges referred to in Sections 6 and 11 of that By-law be
increased by 6.2 percent being the annual increase in the Construction Price
Statistics for the Non-Residential Building Construction Price Index as reported
by Statistics Canada for the year ended March 31,2006; and,
3. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be given authority to give
effect thereto.
Executive Summary: Adoption of the Recommendations of this report will put into
effect for the period July 1,2006 to June 30, 2007 increases that are provided for in the
Development Charges Act 1997 and Ontario Regulation 82/98 and By-law 6349/04 and
are needed to finance construction costs under the City's Development Charge
Background Study adopted by Council in July 2004. This is an annual adjustment
needed to keep revenues current with costs.
Financial Implications: Increasing the Development Charges by 6.2 percent will
assist in keeping the revenues generated thereunder in line with current costs. The
residential development charges for single and semi detached units will increase by
approximately $536, other residential charges will increase similarly and the
commercial/industrial charge will increase by approximately $0.15 per square foot or
$1.57 per square metre.
073
Report CS 29-06
Date: May 23, 2006
Subject: Development Charges- Annual Indexing
Page 2
Background: As provided for in the Ontario Reg. 82/98 and in the City's By-law
6349/04, each year the development charges charged by the City for all types of
development may be increased without amending the By-law. Adoption of the
recommendations contained in this report will allow that increase to take effect July 1,
2006 thereby assisting in keeping our revenues in line with the costs that development
charges go towards.
Statistics Canada indicates the increase in the Construction Price Statistics for the most
recently available annual period ending March 31, 2006 of 6.2 percent for Non-
Residential Building Construction Price Index (an indicator of our costs of construction)
for the Toronto area. The change is reflected in the table attached.
The City's obligations under Recommendations contained in the same report CS 21-04
(2004 Development Charges Background Study) to Council in the form of contribution to
the Development Charges - City's Share should also increase by 6.2 percent. The 2006
Budget contained $590,000 of contribution for this purpose and a budgeted draw of
$264,550 thus, increasing the 2006 year-end balance to $809,704. Significant
contributions in 2007 and after are necessary in order to bring the fund balance to an
acceptable level. The Commercial/Industrial Development Charge remains at the
Council approved level of approximately 50 percent of the justified cost recovery
amount, meaning the City has to contribute to the balance.
At this juncture, the Region of Durham has not finalized the annual indexing of the
development charges the City collects on their behalf. The City will continue to use
rates prescribed as effective from October 1, 2005 until further notice from the Region.
The Education Development Charges will remain unchanged for the current year.
The main changes are to update the amounts to reflect recommendations contained in
this report. Upon receiving the final figures from the Region for the portion of the
development charges the City collects on their behalf in mid June, the brochure will be
revised and distributed. The brochure will be posted on the City's website and made
available at various counters throughout the Civic Complex.
Attachments:
1 . Current and Proposed Development Charges 2006/2007
U74
Report CS 29-06
Date: May 23, 2006
Subject: Development Charges- Annual Indexing
Page 3
Prepared By:
Approved I Endorsed By:
~.-"^"-
-k:(;;: . ..~,..
Caryn Kong
Senior Financial Analyst
~-7--£l::~~
Gillis A. Paterson
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
GAP:vw
Attachment
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Chief Building Official
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering City Council
,If
"
,;
.,i ïACHMENT #-1-. TO REPORT # (s'29 ~Jb
CITY OF PICKERING
Ü75
CURRENT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
Effective July 1,2005
PER DWELLING UNIT
Service Single & Apt. Two Other
Category Semi Apt. One Bdrm Bdrm Dwelling
Detached ($) & Smaller ($) & Larger ($) Units ($)
Growth Studies $114 $43 $65 $93
Fire Protection 358 134 203 290
Transportation 4,412 1,642 2,506 3,584
Parks & Rec 3,267 1,217 1,857 2,654
Librarv 520 194 295 421
TOTAL $8,671 $3,230 $4,926 $7,042
Non-Residential - $2.35 per sq. foot or $25.30 per sq. metre
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
Effective July 1,2006
PER DWELLING UNIT
Service Single & Apt. Two Other
Category Semi Apt. One Bdrm Bdrm Dwelling
Detached ($) & Smaller ($) & Larger ($) Units
Growth Studies $121 $45 $69 $98
Fire Protection 380 142 215 307
Transportation 4,685 1,743 2,661 3,806
Parks & Rec 3,469 1,292 1,972 2,818
Library 552 206 313 447
TOTAL $9,207 $3,428 $5,230 $7,476
Non-Residential - $2.50 per sq. foot or $26.87 per sq. metre
$ Increase:
Residential $536 198 304 $434
Non- $0.15 per sq. $1.57 per sq.
Residential foot metre