HomeMy WebLinkAboutFebruary 27, 2006
(I)
(II)
(III)
1.
Executive Committee Meeting
. Agenda
Monday, February 27, 2006
7:30 pm
Council Chambers
Chair: Councillor Dickerson
ADOPTION OF MINUTES
PAGES
Meeting of February 13, 2006
"In Camera" meeting of February 13, 2006
A-G
Under
Separate
Cover
DELEGA TIONS
MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION
Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 07-06
Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 05-001/P
Amendment 15 to the Pickering Official Plan
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 16/05
Amending By-law to amend Zoning By-law 3037
City Initiated: Oak Ridges Moraine Conformity Exercise
City of Pickerinq
1-114
1.
That Council receive Report PD 07-06 on Official Plan Amendment
Application OPA 05-001/P (now Amendment 15 to the Pickering Official
Plan), and Zoning By-law Amendment Application 16/05, City Initiated:
Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan Conformity Amendments;
(a) That Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 05-001/P, initiated by
the City of Pickering, to implement the Oak Ridges Moraine
Conservation Plan for lands within the Oak Ridges Moraine Area, be
approved as set out in Exhibit "A" to Appendix I to Report PD 07-06;
(b) That the draft by-law to adopt Amendment 15 to the Pickering Official
Plan, to implement the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, be
forwarded for enactment to Council as set out in Appendix I to Report
PD 07-06;
(a) That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 16/05, initiated by the
City of Pickering, to implement the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation
Plan for lands within the Oak Ridges Moraine Area, be approved as
set out in Appendix II to Report PD 07-06;
2.
3.
2.
Executive Committee Meeting
Agenda
Monday, February 27,2006
7:30 pm
Council Chambers
Chair: Councillor Dickerson
4.
(b) That the amending by-law to amend Zoning By-law 3037, as amended,
to implement the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, be forwarded
for enactment to Council as set out in Appendix II to Report PD 07-06;
That the Oak Ridges Moraine Conformity Amendments, Amendment 15
and the amending by-law to amend Zoning By-law 3037, be forwarded for
approval by the City Clerk to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing;
That Council adopt Informational Revision 13 as set out in Appendix III to
Report PD 07-06 for inclusion in the Pickering Official Plan;
That Council request the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing to
resolve Deferrals 28 and 34 relating to the proposed Rural Hamlet
designation and settlement policies for Altona and approve the Oak
Ridges Moraine Natural Linkage Area and Oak Ridges Moraine
Countryside land use designations recommended in Amendment 15;
5.
6.
7.
That Council direct staff to update the City's Municipal Tree Protection By-
law to reflect the natural features within the Oak Ridges Moraine, and that
staff initiate a review of the existing Fill and Topsoil Disturbance By-law to
determine whether new provisions for lands within the Oak Ridges
Moraine are required;
That Council refer the request of Peter Wood, to further review the
proposed Old Brock Road and Uxbridge-Townline Road realignment as
shown on Schedule IV-10 - Settlement 10: Claremont and Area - North
Section of the Pickering Official Plan, to be considered as part of the next
Official Plan review;
8.
9.
That the City Clerk forward a copy of Report PD 07-06 to the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Region of Durham, the Town of Markham,
the Town of Wh itchurch-Stouffville , the Township of Uxbridge, the Township
of Scugog, the Town of Whitby, and the Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority.
Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 10-06
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 23/05
Wencray Holdings Limited
2000 Clements Road
Part of Lot 15, B.F.C. Range 3
(40R-6080, Part 5)
City of Pickerinq
115-153
3.
2.
4.
Executive Committee Meeting
Agenda
Monday, February 27, 2006
7:30 pm
Council Chambers
Chair: Councillor Dickerson
1.
That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 23/05, be approved as set
out in the draft by-law attached as Appendix I to Report PD 10-06, to
amend the existing zoning on the subject lands to permit outdoor storage
associated with a roofing supply business office and warehouse on lands
being, Part of Lot 15, B.F.C. Range 3, (40R-6080, 5), in the City of
Pickering.
2.
That the amending zoning by-law to implement Zoning By-law
Amendment Application A 23/05, as set out in Appendix I to Report PD
10-06 be forwarded to City Council for enactment.
Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 13-06
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/05
J. & B. Bayes and T. & A. Costar
823 & 827 Sheppard Avenue
(Part of Lot 27, Range 3, B.F.C.)
City of Pickering
154-178
1.
That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/05, be approved to
permit the development of a maximum of eight townhouse dwelling
units, as submitted by 816 Kingston Road (Pickering) Limited on behalf
of J. & B. Bayes and T. & A. Costar, on lands being Part of Lot 27,
Range 3, B.F.C., City of Pickering.
That the amending zoning by-law to implement Zoning By-law
Amendment Application A 11/05, as set out in Appendix I to Report PD
13-06, be forwarded to City Council for enactment.
Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 14-06
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 24/05
Delco Homes Inc.
Sparrow Circle (at Altona Road)
(Block 17, Plan 40M-1827)
City of Pickerinq
1.
179-214
That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 24/05 be approved to
permit a freehold townhouse, common element road condominium
development on lands being Block 17, Plan 40M-1827, City of Pickering,
submitted by Delco Homes Inc.
5.
6.
Executive Committee Meeting
Agenda
Monday, February 27, 2006
7:30 pm
Council Chambers
Chair: Councillor Dickerson
2.
That the amending zoning by-law to implement Zoning By-law
Amendment Application A 24/05, as set out in Appendix I to Report PD
14-06 be forwarded to City Council for enactment.
Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 16-06
Direction on City Staff Involvement on an
Appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board
Committee of Adjustment Decision on Application PICA 55/05
Pickering Auto Body Ltd.
1968 Notion Road
(North Part of Lot 17, Concession 1)
City of Pickerinq
215-246
1.
That the Ontario Municipal Board be advised that City Council supports
the decision of the Committee of Adjustment refusing the variance to
reduce the required parking spaces for PICA 55/05 at 1968 Notion Road.
That the appropriate City staff attend the March 20, 2006, Ontario
Municipal Board hearing in opposition of the application and to advance
Council's support of the Committee of Adjustment decision.
2.
Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 17-06
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 27/05
Silverlane Estates Inc.
South Part of Lot 32, Concession 1
(Blocks 39 and 46, Plan 40M-2119 and Part 4, 40R-11901)
City of Pickerinq
247 -263
1.
That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 27/05 be approved, to
rezone two Blocks to match the zoning of abutting land, to permit
development of a townhouse and a detached dwelling, on lands being
Blocks 39 and 46, Plan 40M-2119, and; to rezone two additional Blocks to
allow for open space uses, on lands being Part 4, Plan 40R-11901 (Blocks
16 and 18, Draft Plan of Subdivision S-P-2002-06).
2.
That the amending zoning by-law to implement Zoning By-law
Amendment Application A 27/05, as set out in Appendix I to Report PD
17 -06, be forwarded to City Council for enactment.
7.
Executive Committee Meeting
Agenda
Monday, February 27, 2006
7:30 pm
Council Chambers
Chair: Councillor Dickerson
Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 18-06
Proposed Modifications to the Proposed Central Pickering
Development Plan
Prepared by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing
Dated February 1, 2006
EBR Reqistrv Number: PF05EOO02
Handout Report
Delivered Under
Separate Cover
8.
Director, Operations & Emergency Service, Report OES 08-06
Frenchman's Bay Stormwater Management Master Plan
Request for Proposal for Professional Engineering Services
RFP-13-2005
264-270
1.
That Report OES 08-06 regarding the Frenchman's Bay Stormwater
Management Master Plan, Request for Proposal for professional
engineering services be received.
2.
That the Proposal RFP-13-2005 submitted by Marshall Macklin
Monaghan Limited to develop a Stormwater Management Master Plan
for Frenchman's Bay be accepted.
3.
That the total project cost of $144,855 including the proposal amount,
project management services and other associated project costs
identified in the report be approved.
4.
That staff at the City of Pickering be given the authority to give effect
thereto.
9.
Director, Operations & Emergency Services, Report OES 10-06
Construction Priorities for Regional Roads
Within the City of Pickerinq
271-275
That Report OES 10-06 regarding Regional Road construction priorities within
the City of Pickering be received for information and forwarded to the Regional
Municipality of Durham.
10.
Director, Operations & Emergency Services, Report OES 11-06 276-279
Lease of City of Pickering lands to O.J. Muller Landscape Contractor Ltd.
Renewal of Lease Agreement for those lands comprising those parts of
Lot 19, Concession 3, Pickering, designated as Part 2, Plan 40R-7012,
save and except Part 2. Plan 40R-14541 and Part 3. Plan 40R-7012
Ciú¡ o~
11.
12.
2.
Executive Committee Meeting
Agenda
Monday, February 27,2006
7:30 pm
Council Chambers
Chair: Councillor Dickerson
1.
That Report OES 11-06 regarding renewal of a lease agreement be
received.
2.
That the request by O.J. Muller Landscape Contractor Ltd. to renew a
lease for City land on Brock Road for the purposes of cultivating the land
for cash crops and to store and market nursery stock that includes
landscape materials be approved.
3.
That the Mayor and the City Clerk be authorized to sign a renewal lease
agreement with O.J. Muller Landscape Contractor involving City lands,
substantially on terms set out in the form prepared by the City Solicitor.
Director, Operations & Emergency Services, Report OES 12-06
Lease of City of Pickering lands to T. Arnts Loam Supply Ltd.
Renewal of Lease Agreement for those lands comprising those parts of Lot 19,
Concession 3, Pickering, and comprising that part of Part 37 and 40, Plan 40R-
6934
280-283
1.
That Report OES 12-06 regarding renewal of a lease agreement be
received.
2.
That the request by T. Arnts Loam Supply Ltd. to renew a lease for City
land on Brock Road for the purposes of carrying on the business of the
storage, sale and supply of topsoil, sand, stone, pavers and related
products be approved.
3.
That the Mayor and the City Clerk be authorized to sign a renewal lease
agreement with T. Arnts Loam Supply Ltd. involving City lands,
substantially on terms set out in the form prepared by the City Solicitor.
Director, Operations & Emergency Services, Report OES 13-06 284-287
Lease of City of Pickering lands to 1317970 Ontario Inc.
Renewal of Lease Agreement for those lands comprising that part of Parts 37
and 40. Plan 40R-6934
1.
That Report OES 13-06 regarding renewal of a lease agreement be
received.
That the request by 1317970 Ontario Inc. to renew a lease for City land
on Brock Road for the purposes of carrying on the business of a golf-
13.
Executive Committee Meeting
Agenda
Monday, February 27, 2006
7:30 pm
Council Chambers
Chair: Councillor Dickerson
driving range located at least 85 metres west of Brock Road and at
least 6.1 metres south of the northerly boundary of the premises and a
miniature golf-putting facility located at least 6.1 metres south of the
northerly boundary of the premises and an accessory parking area
located between the golf-driving range and Brock Road and south of
the miniature golf-putting facility be approved.
3.
That the Mayor and the City Clerk be authorized to sign a renewal
lease agreement with 1317970 Ontario Inc. involving City lands,
substantially on terms set out in the form prepared by the City Solicitor.
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, Report CS 14-06
Chanqes to Proposed Body Rub Parlour By-law
288-346
1.
That Report CS 02-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
be received for information.
2.
That Report CS 14-06 regarding changes to the proposed Body Rub
Parlour By-law be received.
3.
That the attached draft by-law be enacted to provide for the licensing
and regulation of Body Rub Parlours within the City of Pickering, and
4.
That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be given the
authority to give effect thereto.
(IV) OTHER BUSINESS
(V)
ADJOURNMENT
Executive Committee
Meeting Minutes
Monday, February 13, 2006
8:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Brenner
PRESENT:
Mayor Ryan
COUNCILLORS:
K. Ashe
M. Brenner
D. Dickerson
R.Johnson
B. McLean
D. Pickles
ALSO PRESENT:
T. J. Quinn
E. Buntsma
N. Carroll
G. Paterson
D. Bentley
D. Shields
- Chief Administrative Officer
- Director, Operations & Emergency Services
- Director, Planning & Development
- Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
- City Clerk
- Deputy Clerk
(I)
ADOPTION OF MINUTES
Moved by Councillor Johnson
Seconded by Councillor Dickerson
Meeting of January 24, 2006
"In Camera" meeting of January 24, 2006
CARRIED
A
(II)
4.
Executive Committee
Meeting Minutes
Monday, February 13, 2006
8:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Brenner
MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION
1.
Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 04-06
Release and Abandonment of Easement
Part of Lot 8, Plan 40M-2164, being Part 8, Plan 40R-22163
Storm Drainage Purposes Registered as Instrument DR202450
File: RE0520
That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute, for the
purpose of registration, a Release and Abandonment of Easement
registered as Instrument DR202450 relating to that part of Lot 8,
Plan 40M-2164, being Part 8, Plan 40R-22163.
2.
Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 06-06
- Danlu Holdings Limited
Plan of Subdivision 40M-2093
- 1490737 Ontario Inc.
Plan of Subdivision 40M-2099
Final Assumption of Plans of Subdivision
By-laws should be enacted to :
1. Assume the roads and services within Plans 40M-2093 and
40M-2099 (save and except from Blocks 36 to 38);
2. Amend By-law 1416/82 (Places of Amusement) to include
the roads within Plans 40M-2093 and 40M-2099; and
3. Authorize the release and removal of the Subdivision
Agreements from title relating to Plans 40M-2093 and
40M-2099.
Director, Operations & Emergency Services, Report OES 02-06
Green River Community Centre
- Horizon House, Where Heaven and Earth Meet
- Lease Renewal Agreement
- File: A-2130-001-06
1. That Report OES 02-06 be received; and
B
Executive Committee
Meeting Minutes
Monday, February 13, 2006
8:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Brenner
2. That the Mayor and the Clerk be authorized to execute a renewal lease
agreement to permit the Horizon House, Where Heaven and Earth
Meet to continue their use for church purposes at the Green River
Community Centre from April 1 , 2006 to March 31, 2007 that is in the
form and substance acceptable to the Director, Operations &
Emergency Services and the City Solicitor.
5.
Director, Operations & Emergency Services, Report OES 03-06
Management Agreement with Claremont Lions Club
- Claremont Community Centre
- File: A-2130-001-06
1. That Report OES 03-06 be received; and
2. That the Mayor and the Clerk be authorized to execute a renewal
management agreement to permit the Claremont Lions Club to
continue to provide management services to the Corporation at the
Claremont Community Centre from April 1, 2006 to March 31,2009
that is in the form and substance acceptable to the Director,
Operations & Emergency Services and the City Solicitor.
6.
Director, Operations & Emergency Services, Report OES 05-06
West Shore Community Centre
- Gingerbread Co-operative Nursery School (Pickering) Inc.
- Licence Renewal Agreement
- File: A-2130-001-06
1. That Report OES 05-06 be received; and
2. That the Mayor and the Clerk be authorized to execute a renewal
Licence Agreement to permit the Gingerbread Co-operative Nursery
School (Pickering) to continue to operate a co-operative nursery school
at West Shore Community Centre from April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2009
that is in the form and substance acceptable to the Director,
Operations & Emergency Services and the City Solicitor.
7.
Director, Operations & Emergency Services, Report OES 06-06
Pickering Recreation Complex Pottery Studio
Licence Renewal Agreement
- File: A-2130-00 1-06
C
Executive Committee
Meeting Minutes
Monday, February 13, 2006
8:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Brenner
1. That Report OES 06-06 be received; and
2. That the Mayor and the Clerk be authorized to execute a renewal
Pottery Studio Agreement to permit Guida Pirita and Ana-Paula
Leandro to continue to operate pottery programs at the Pickering
Recreation Complex from April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2009 that is in
the form and substance acceptable to the Director, Operations &
Emergency Services and the City Solicitor.
8.
Director, Operations & Emergency Services, Report OES 07-06
Nuclear Waste Management
Peer Review of NWMO Final Report
- File: A-2130-001
1. That Council receive Report OES 07-06 concerning the peer review of
the Nuclear Waste Management Organization Final Report;
2. That Council urge Nuclear Waste Management Organization to
address the list of outstanding issues related to their Final Report as
identified in the Acres- Sargent & Lundy Peer Review Report;
3. That Council be on record as continuing to support the work that the
Nuclear Waste Organization (NWMO) is conducting and that the
Federal Government be urged to promptly begin addressing the
recommendations of NWMO Final Report; and
4. That a copy of this Resolution be forwarded to the Federal Minister of
Natural Resources, Nuclear Waste Management Organization,
Canadian Association of Nuclear Host Communities, and Ontario
Power Generation.
Moved by Councillor Dickerson
Seconded by Councillor Johnson
That the Committee adopt the recommendations set out in Item Nos. 1 to
9, inclusive, save and except Item Nos. 3 and 9 thereof.
CARRIED
D
Executive Committee
Meeting Minutes
Monday, February 13, 2006
8:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Brenner
3.
Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 11-06
Bill 51-Amendments to the Planning Act and the Conservation
Land Act - First Reading
Ontario Municipal Board and Planning Act Reforms
EBR Reqistration Number AF05EOO01
Moved by Councillor Dickerson
Seconded by Councillor Johnson
1. That Pickering Council receive and endorse Report PD 11-06
on Bill 51, an Act to amend the Planning Act and the Conservation
Land Act and to make related amendments to other Acts, EBR
Registration Number AF05EOO01.
2. That the City Clerk submit the following comments to the
Environmental Bill of Rights registry respecting Bill 51
(Registration Number AF05EOO01):
(a) The City of Pickering is supportive of the direction of Bill 51,
including elements that give more authority to municipalities and
increase local control over development;
(b) The requirement to host a public open house, for all development
applications, as proposed through amendments to Sections 17
and 34, is unnecessary and will add additional application review
process; and
(c) The requirement to update official plans should apply to all
municipalities that currently have an official plan and not be
limited to those as set out in Subsection 17(13).
3.
That the City Clerk forward a copy of Report PD 11-06 to the
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing.
CARRIED
E
Executive Committee
Meeting Minutes
Monday, February 13, 2006
8:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Brenner
9.
Appointments to the Civic Awards Selection Committee
The Chair outlined the process for the nomination of the Members of the
Civic Awards Selection Committee.
Moved by Councillor Ashe
Seconded by Mayor Ryan
That the following Members of Council be appointed to the Civic Awards
Selection Committee:
Mayor Ryan
Councillor Ashe
Councillor Johnson
Councillor McLean
CARRIED
(III)
OTHER BUSINESS
1.
The following matters were considered prior to the regular meeting:
(a)
1.
Confidential Matters
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, Report CS 10-06
Taxi Cab Driver Licence Application - City Clerk to Update
2.
Verbal Update - Labour Relations Matter - CUPE - CAO to Update
Moved by Councillor Dickerson
Seconded by Councillor Ashe
That Committee move into an 'In Camera" meeting of Committee in order
to discuss a personal matter about an identifiable individual, including
municipal or local board employees and labour relations or employee
negotiations.
CARRIED
Refer to the "In Camera" minutes of the Executive Committee dated February 13,
2006.
F
Executive Committee
Meeting Minutes
Monday, February 13, 2006
8:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Brenner
Moved by Councillor McLean
Seconded by Councillor Pickles
That Committee rise and ratify the actions taken at the 'In Camera' session.
CARRIED
(IV)
OTHER BUSINESS
1.
Councillor Pickles gave notice that he would be presenting two Notices of
Motions with regards to Opportunities for Energy Projects and the Nuclear
Liabilities Act.
(V)
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:00 pm.
G
NOTE:
Pages 1-114
REPORT PD 07-06 CAN BE FOUND
SEPARATELY IN LASERFICHE UNDER
RE PO RTS.
IT IS PROVIDED SEPARATELY DUE TO
THE SIZE OF THE REPORT AND MAPS
ENCLOSED.
Ciú/ o~
REPORT TO
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
lle
Report Number: PD 10-06
Date: February 13, 2006
From:
Neil Carroll
Director, Planning & Development
Subject:
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 23/05
Wencray Holdings Limited
2000 Clements Road
Part of Lot 15, B.F.C. Range 3
(40R-6080, Part 5)
City of Pickering
Recommendation:
1.
That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 23/05, be APPROVED as set out
in the draft by-law attached as Appendix I to Report PD 10-06, to amend the
existing zoning on the subject lands to permit outdoor storage associated with a
roofing supply business office and warehouse on lands being, Part of Lot 15,
B.F.C. Range 3, (40R-6080, 5), in the City of Pickering.
2.
That the amending zoning by-law to implement Zoning By-law Amendment
Application A 23/05, as set out in Appendix I to Report PD 10-06 be
FORWARDED to City Council for enactment.
Executive Summary: The applicant requests to change the zoning by-law to permit
outdoor storage associated with a permitted roofing supply business and warehouse.
The subject property is located on the north side of the curve of Clements RoadlChurch
Street (see Attachment #1 - Location Map).
The proposed business office and warehouse use are permitted by the existing by-law.
The outdoor storage component of the proposed use requires an amendment to the
zoning by-law. Storage will primarily be for shingles and related roofing supplies, in the
rear yard, and within a future unheated storage building in the northwest corner of the
property (see Attachment #2 - Applicant's Submitted Plan). Building locations and
outdoor storage limitations will be addressed through the amending zoning by-law.
Landscaped buffering around the property will be addressed through the site plan
review process to minimize the visual impact of the outdoor storage area on abutting
properties. The proposed development is appropriate and compatible within the Brock
Industrial Neighbourhood. Industrial uses dominate this area and the introduction of
limited outdoor storage should not negatively impact surrounding properties.
It is recommended that the application be approved and that the draft by-law be
forwarded to Council for enactment.
116Report PD 10-06
Subject: Wencray Holdings Limited
February 13, 2006
Page 2
Financial Implications:
proposed development.
No direct costs to the City are anticipated as a result of the
Background:
1.0
1.1
Comments Received
At the October 20, 2005 Information Meeting
(see text of Information Report, Attachment #3 and Meeting Minutes, Attachment #4)
Public Comments
no public present at the meeting;
Applicant's Comments
- Arnold Mostert, Barry Bryan & Associates (agent for Wencray) advised that
they were present to answer any questions and to submit letters of support for
the application;
Other attendees at the meeting were:
. Craig Glynn, Wencray Holdings;
. Wendy Sprague, Vice President, Spar-Marathon;
. Dana Coverdale, Director, Sales & Marketing, Spar-Marathon;
. Steve Bronetto, Bonamax, Strategic Advisor for Wencray Holdings;
Comments received since the public meetinq:
Barr's Roofing Siding Sheetmetal Ltd., D. Sullivan Condominium Service,
Moffat Bros. Roofing Ltd., AMA Roofing & Sheetmetal, Goreski Roofing &
Lathing Ltd., and Sagar Aggarwal, all in support of the application (see
Attachments #5 - #10)
- Walker, Nott, Dragicevic Associates Limited (WND) commented on behalf of
Runnymede Development Corporation (see Attachment #11);
- WND commented on the following aspects of the application:
. the need to appropriately screen the outdoor storage component from
adjacent properties by means of solid screen fencing and landscaping
techniques;
. the need to locate the building foot print in such a way to ensure that the
building is oriented to the street and help in the screening of the outdoor
storage component;
. the need to limit the location and scale in the by-law;
Crossby - Dewar Projects Inc. commented asking for landscaping to be
installed in the northwest corner of the property to hide the view of the
proposed storage building and outside storage area (see Attachment #12);
Report PD 10-06
February 13, 2006
Page 3
117
Subject: Wencray Holdings Limited
1.2
Agencies
Durham Reaion Plannina Department
- conforms with the 'Employment Area' designation in the Regional Official Plan;
- a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment has been done and indicated that
there is a low potential for environmental impact of the subject property;
- no additional environmental work is required and no other matters of provincial
interest are applicable to this application;
- sanitary services are available from Church Street and water supply is only
available through the extension of a 300mm watermain along Clements Road;
- the applicant will be responsible for the associated costs (see Attachment #13);
Toronto & Reaion Conservation Authority
The TRCA commented on three occasions on this application. Their comments
of October 27, 2005 (see Attachment #14) and November 23, 2005 (see
Attachment #15), addressed a number of issues, but were replaced with
comments made on December 21, 2005.
December 21, 2005 comments:
- a site visit was conducted on December 14, 2005;
- given the current zoning and that the Environmental Significant Area (ESA) is
bisected by Clements RoadlChurch Street, no Environmental Impact Study is
required;
- request to protect 40R-6080, Part 7 (lands south of 2000 Clements Road) in
perpetuity as it remains an integral part of the ESA within the Duffins Creek
Watershed;
- request that City Planning staff put forward a recommendation to Pickering
Council to pass a resolution to obtain these lands (40R-6080, Part 7) as open
space to offset the environmental impacts of constructing the Clements/Church
road connection and the proposed Wencray development at 2000 Clements
Road (see Attachment #16);
1.3
City Departments
Pickerina Fire Services
- no objection to the application;
11. fkeport PD 10-06
February 13, 2006
Subject: Wencray Holdings Limited
Page 4
2.0
2.1
Discussion
Use and Compatibility
2.1.1 The proposed use complies with the Pickerinq Official Plan desiqnation
The subject property is designated General Employment in the Pickering Official
Plan. This designation permits manufacturing, assembly, warehousing, storage of
goods and materials, transportation facilities, offices and retail sales as minor
component of an industrial operation. Outdoor storage associated with a roofing
supply business office and warehouse conforms to the policies of this designation.
2.1.2 Limited outdoor storaqe is an appropriate and compatible use within the Brock
Industrial Neiqhbourhood
Limited open storage associated with a roofing supply office and warehouse is an
appropriate use to introduce on this property. The property is located within the
Brock Industrial Neighbourhood. Open storage of materials exists at several
sites throughout the Neighbourhood. Zoning restrictions apply to ensure that
open storage activities do not adversely impact and degrade the character of
industrial sectors within the neighbourhood. In this specific circumstance, the
subject property abuts other industrial uses such as Harmony Logistics to the
north and the Husky Truck Stop to the west. Both properties allocate significant
site area to the outside storage of tractor-trailers associated with their operations.
Therefore, the limited storage of roofing supplies associated with a roofing supply
office and warehouse would be an appropriate and compatible use within this
neighbourhood. Visual impacts can be minimized through performance
standards of the implementing zoning by-law and screening provisions required
through the site plan approval process.
2.2
Zoning By-law Performance Standards
2.2.1 Buildinq location will be appropriately set back from Clements RoadlChurch Street
The building setback from Clements Road/Church Street will be a minimum of
6.0 metres and a maximum of 8.0 metres. These setbacks will place the building
close to the street and allow the building to function as a buffer between any
outdoor storage and the street. Further, by minimizing the setback from the
street, front yard parking and storage opportunities are eliminated and
opportunities for an enhanced streetscape are increased.
2.2.2 Setback and heiqht limitations will be imposed on the outdoor storaqe and future
storaqe buildinq
All outdoor storage, including the future storage building in the northwest corner
of the site, will be set back 20.0 metres from the west property line and
6.0 metres from the north property line. All outdoor storage will be located
behind the officelwarehouse building. This area will store roofing supplies and
other associated materials, which are part of SPAR-Marathon's operation.
Report PO 10-06
February 13, 2006
119
Subject: Wencray Holdings Limited
Page 5
It is recommended that the minimum height for buildings be 6.5 metres and that
open storage of materials be restricted to a maximum height of 5.0 metres. A
minimum height for buildings will ensure appropriate buffering of materials stored
outdoors. Limiting the height of 8m ate rials stored outside reduces the impact on
abutting properties.
2.3
Site Plan Requirements
2.3.1 ScreeninQ of the Outdoor Storaqe Area will be addressed throuqh the Site Plan
Process
Screening methods will be reviewed through the site plan review process.
Outdoor storage will be appropriately screened from abutting properties and
streets. The proposed building location abutting Clements Road/Church Street
will significantly buffer the outdoor storage area from the street. Landscaping will
be required around the perimeter of the property to provide a further buffer.
2.4
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)
2.4.1 The TRCA requests that City Planninq staff put forward a recommendation to
Pickerinq Council to obtain lands outside of this application for conservation
purposes (see Attachment #16)
The TRCA have requested that the City Planning staff recommend that Pickering
Council pass a resolution to allow TRCA to obtain lands municipally known as
2001 Clements Road (40R-6080, Part 7 - lands south of 2000 Clements Road)
for open space (see Attachment #17). We acknowledge TRCA's request and
desire to obtain and protect lands of environmental significance and are willing to
work with Authority staff on this matter. The lands requested by the TRCA are
located outside of the lands subject to this application. This request would be
best dealt with as a separate matter, initiated through a resolution from TRCA's
Executive Committee. Upon receipt of such a resolution, City staff can formally
engage the Authority in pursuing this land interest, through appropriate
processes.
3.0
Applicant's Comments
The applicant is aware of the content of this report, has reviewed the draft zoning
by-law, and concurs with the recommendations.
APPENDIX:
Appendix I: Draft By-law
120 Report PD 10-06
February 13, 2006
Subject: Wencray Holdings Limited
Page 6
Attachments:
1 . Location Map
2. Applicant's Submitted Plan
3. Text of Information Report
4. Public Information Meeting Minutes
5. Letter of Support - Barr's Roofing Siding Sheetmetal Ltd.
6. Letter of Support - D. Sullivan Condominium Service
7. Letter of Support - Moffat Bros. Roofing Ltd.
8. Letter of Support - AMA Roofing & Sheetmetal
9. Letter of Support - Goreski Roofing & Lathing Ltd.
10. Letter of Support - Sagar Aggarwal
11. Comments from Runnymede Development Corporation
clo Walker, Nott, Dragicevic Associates Limited
12. Comments from Crossby-Dewar Projects Inc.
13. Comments from the Region of Durham Planning Department
14. Comments from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority - October 27,2005
15. Comments from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority - November 23, 2005
16. Comments from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority - December 21, 2005
17. Location Map showing lands requested by TRCA
Prepared By:
Approved I Endorsed By:
Neil Carroll, p, P
Director, Planning & Development
GXR: Id
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering C!ty Co/ It' "
}
,
/...
APPENDIX I TO
REPORT PD 10-06
DRAFT BY-LAW
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 23/05
121
In<f'1
. (;., ¡;:..-
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 2511, as
amended, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of
Durham, being Part of Lot 15, B.F.C. Range 3, (40R-6080, Part 5), in the
City of Pickering. (A 23/05)
WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering deems it desirable to
permit outdoor storage associated with a roofing supply business office and warehouse
being Part of Lot 15, B.F.C. Range 3, (40R-6080, Part 5), in the City of Pickering.
AND WHEREAS an amendment to By-law 2511, is therefore deemed necessary;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF
PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1.
SCHEDULE I & II
Schedule I & " attached hereto with notations and references shown thereon is
hereby declared to be part of this By-law.
2.
AREA RESTRICTED
The provisions of this By-law shall apply to those lands in Part of Lot 15, B.F.C.
Range 3, (40R-6080, Part 5), City of Pickering, designated "M1-14" on Schedule
I attached hereto.
3.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
No building, land or part thereof shall hereafter be used, occupied, erected,
moved, or structurally altered except in conformity with the provisions of this
By-law.
4.
DEFINITIONS
In this By-law,
1)
"Bakery" shall mean a building or part of a building in which food products
are baked, prepared and offered for retail sale, or in which food products
baked and prepared elsewhere are offered for retail sale;
2)
"Body Rub" includes the kneading, manipulating, rubbing, massaging,
touching, or stimulating, by any means, of a person's body or part thereof
but does not include medical or therapeutic treatment given by a person
otherwise duly qualified, licensed or registered so to do under the laws of
the Province of Ontario;
8)
9)
10)
;( -2-
~, 123
d Rub Parlour" includes any premises or part thereof where a body
is preformed, offered or solicited in pursuance of a trade, calling,
usiness or occupation, but does not include any premises or part thereof
where the body rubs performed are for the purpose of medical or
therapeutic treatment and are preformed or offered by persons otherwise
duly qualified, licensed or registered so to do under the laws of the
Province of Ontario;
4)
"Business Office" shall mean any building or part of a building in which
one or more persons are employed in the management, direction or
conducting of an agency, business, brokerage, labour or fraternal
organization but shall not include a retail store;
"Food Preparation Plant" shall mean a building or part of a building in
which processed food products are cooked, baked, mixed, packaged or
otherwise prepared for distribution to retail or institutional outlets;
5)
6)
"Liqht Manufacturinq Plant" shall mean a manufacturing plant used for:
the production of apparel and finished textile products other than the
production of synthetic fibers; printing or duplicating; the manufacturing of
finished paper other than the processing of wood pulp; the production of
cosmetics, drugs and other pharmaceutical supplies; or, the
manufacturing of finished lumber products, light metal products, electronic
products, plasticware, porcelain, earthenware, glassware or similar
articles, including but not necessarily restricted to, furniture, housewares,
toys, musical instruments, jewellery, watches, precision instruments,
radios and electronic components;
7)
"Manufacturinq Plant" shall mean a building or part of a building in which is
carried on any activity or operation pertaining to the making of any article,
and which shall include altering, assembling, repairing, ornamenting,
finishing, cleaning, polishing, washing, packing, adapting for sale,
breaking up or demolishing the said article;
"Merchandise Service Shop" shall mean an establishment where articles
or goods including, but not necessarily limited to, business machines,
appliances, furniture or similar items are repaired or serviced, and
includes the regular place of business of a master electrician or master
plumber, but shall not include a manufacturing plant or any establishment
used for the service or repair of vehicles or a retail store;
"Printinq Establishment" shall mean an establishment used for
blueprinting, engraving, electro-typing, photocopying, plotting from disk,
printing, stereotyping or typesetting;
"Professional Office" shall mean a building or part of a building in which
medical, legal or other professional service is performed or consultation
given, and which may include a clinic, the offices of an architect, a
chartered accountant, an engineer, a lawyer or a physician, but shall not
include a body-rub parlour as defined by the Municipal Act, RS.O. 1990,
c.M. 45, as amended from time-to-time, or any successor thereto;
13)
14)
5.
-3-
tail Store" shall mean a building or part of a building in which goods,
i ares, merchandise, substances, articles or things are stored, kept and
offered for retail sale to the public;
12)
"Sales Outlet" shall mean a building or part of a building accessory to a
bakery, a food preparation plant, a light manufacturing plant, a
manufacturing plant, a merchandise service shop, a printing
establishment, or a warehouse, wherein products manufactured,
produced, processed, stored, serviced or repaired on the premises are
kept or displayed for rent or for wholesale or retail sale, or wherein orders
are taken for future delivery of such products;
"Scientific. Medical or Research Laboratory" shall mean a building or part
of a building wherein scientific, research or medical experiments or
investigations are systematically conducted, or where drugs, chemicals,
glassware or other substances or articles pertinent to such experiments or
investigations may be manufactured or otherwise prepared for use on the
premises;
"Warehouse" shall mean a building or part of a building which is used
primarily for the housing, storage, adapting for sale, packaging, or
wholesale distribution of goods, wares, merchandise, food-stuffs,
substances, articles or things, and includes the premises of a
warehouseman but shall not include a fuel storage tank except as an
accessory use;
PROVISIONS
(1 )
(2)
Uses Permitted ("M1-14" Zone)
No person shall within the lands designated "M1-14" on Schedule I
attached hereto, use any lot or erect, alter, or use any building or structure
for any purpose except the following:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
business office;
light manufacturing plant;
professional office;
sales outlet;
scientific, medical or research laboratory;
warehouse;
Zone Requirements ("M1-14" Zone).
No person shall within the lands designated "M1-14" on Schedule I
attached hereto, use any lot or erect, alter or use any building except in
accordance with the following provisions:
I" ~) ~..)
., ,
~¥1ì~\ ' "
\"Wo,
",.,,"f
(i) Building Location and Setbacks:
A
All buildings and structures shall be located entirely within
the building envelope illustrated on Schedule II attached to
this By-law;
(ii) Building Heights:
A
Minimum Building Height:
6.5 metres
(b) OUTDOOR STORAGE
(i)
Outdoor storage is only permitted in the area cross-hatched as
illustrated on Schedule II attached to this by-law;
(ii) Outdoor Storage Height:
A
Maximum Outdoor Storage Height:
5.0 metres
(c) PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
(i) No parking is permitted to be located in the front yard;
(ii) For all uses, there shall be provided and maintained on the lands
a minimum of 1.0 parking space for every 56 square metres of
gross leasable floor area or part thereof;
(iii) Section 5.21.2 (a) and (b) of By-law 2511, shall not apply to the
lands zoned "M1-14" on Schedule I attached hereto;
(iv) Despite Clause 5.21.2 (g) and (k) of By-law 2511, as amended,
all entrance and exits to parking areas and all parking areas shall
be surfaced with brick, asphalt, or concrete, or any combination
thereof;
(d) SPECIAL REGULATIONS:
(i) A sales outlet, accessory to a permitted use, shall only be
permitted provided the gross leasable area of the sales outlet
does not exceed 25% of the gross leasable floor area of the
related industrial operation;
6.
BY-LAW 2511
By-law 2511 is hereby further amended only to the extent necessary to give effect
to the provisions of this By-law as it applies to the area set out in Schedule I
attached hereto. Definitions and subject matter not specifically dealt with in this
By-law shall, be governed by the relevant provisions of By-law 2511, as amended.
..",..~
~: "J II
- 5-
7.
EFFECTIVE DATE
This By-law shall come into force in accordance with the provisions of the
Planning Act.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this
,2006.
day of
Debi A. Bentley, City Clerk
COPPERSTONE
w
>
Q::
0
-
SILICONE
w
Z
0
f-
(f]
Q::
w
Cl.
Cl.
0
U
DRIVE
CLEMENTS
MA VOR
CLERK
Aff
'"
127
f-
W
w
Q::
I-
(f]
J¡
~
199.2m
M1-14
~
"V
~
PART LOT " B.'.o.
RANCE J, .OR-50eO, PART'
ROAD .
II
.
I
.
I
l'
N
128
CLEMENTS
f-
W
W
c:r:
f-
(f)
I
U
cr::
~
I
----f--il U
6.0m II
II
II
II
6.0m II
(MIN)'~
I¡
I¡
I¡
I¡
I¡
/)
/)
~.Om \. 1/
I (MAX) ); 1/
.........~
I -----:;:::-~
;;..0-
I = = :::: :::: :::: ::::
ROAD
~ OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA
~ = J BUILDING ENVELOPE
SCHEDULE
PASSED
DAY OF
Ffw
2006
MAYOR
CLERK
l'
IV
.
.
~
c::v
~
~
@
~
~
@
p
U -¡--~_._-~ -
I
I
;0
'<{
0
11::
/:r:
u
/ð
w
-'
-, í
I
VJ
W
11::
lõ
VJ
ATTACHMENT' I TO
REPORT # PO ID-f)"
- -.----.--. - ..--.-.- ..-...--..---.--------.-
--.-.--. -
-__m____._-----.---.- .. __m~- r-.-T.
i
if-
lj
111::
tñ
!
I
I
!
,
I
I
16
I~
¡<.)
r- '-------.-. .-.--.--... ..---
r-nl':)p'.R'::Tn/,[- no,/, ~
'.""--.~'U.'... 'J"~
1~1- II
I I ¡
I I I
I , I
I I . .
! '-----.--. -- ----1 L
! SiLICONE DRIVE
1.--..'-'-
!
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
!w
Z
0
,.-
(/)
a::
l.J
Q..
Q
0
0
L------
CLEMENTS
--.'--.
ROAD
------------- --------
129
l»
~~g
C::::ì
¡:'/
c::¿¡;
Q!2:-J
fC:"
\..::-!J
ÇJ
~:¡
L:::-;::-,
c-~-'
[~:¿:J
.~)
(S
G.--1
I
.-.-.-.---- -.-,----..---
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PART OF LOT 15, B.F.C, RANGE 3, 40R-60BO, PART 1 & 5
OWNER 504063 ONTARIO INC. DATE, AUG. 30 2005 DRAWN BY JB "/'
FILE No. A 23/05 SCALE: 1 :5000 CHECKED BY GR
° o..,ceo:
To'on., £n,.,p,'... Inc. ono it. ...ppli.,.. All "e"'. R...",.". ,"0' o pIon o' .......,..
200~ "PAC onO a. ...opli.,.. A" ,¡ "t. R"."'.d. Not o pion of 5..",. .
PN.4
130
ATTACHMENT # d
REPORT # PO 10'-06
INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S
SUBMITTED PLAN
A 23/05
WENCRAY HOLDINGS LIMITED
TO
---'-n-.-
I
SEVERANCE
BOUNDARY
OF LD 267/01
----"';;.;.;;w'~
,..
OUTDOOR
STORAGE
AREA
I-
W
.' :.'.' w I
l.:/t" Ct:
..J .." I-
~I
~j
(.)/
{.
I"
EXISTING
TRUCK
STOP
8
¡ .,.:;.--
L=~___f
-1---...-...
I
1
_..._._._.-::.~___~I'--""'<;'-
------ not
1
Ii
1f
C-.-. _..._-~._~_...._..._.__.---.._..._.-
--.-.--.-
CLEMENTS ROAD
8
~
THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES
DIVISION MAPPING AND OESIGN. AUGUST 30. 2005
--,
ATTACHMENT I'::; TO
REPORT I PO I !)-Db
131
INFORMATION REPORT NO. 22-05
FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING OF
October 20, 2005
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC MEETING REQUIREMENTS
OF THE PLANNING ACT, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13
SUBJECT:
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 23/05
Wencray Holdings Limited
2000 Clements Road
Part of Lot 15, B.F.C. Range 3
(40R-6080, Part 1 5)
City of Pickering
1.0
PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
- the subject property is approximately 2.6 hectares in size, and located on the
north side of the curve of Clements RoadlChurch Street (see Attachment #1 -
Location Map);
- on the western portioQ,of subject property is the Husky Truck Stop;
- the eastern portion of the subject property is subject to this zoning amendment
application;
- Harmony Logistics abuts the subject property to the north, vacant industrial
zoned lands to the south and environmentally protected land in the Town of
Ajax to the East.
2.0
APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL
- the applicant proposes to amend the zoning of the subject property to permit
outdoor storage associated with a currently permitted use, a roofing supply
business office and warehouse (see Attachment #2 - Applicant's Submitted
Plan);
- approximately 2322 square metres of new floor area is proposed, which will
be a combination of office and warehouse uses;
1858 square metres of floor area for a future unheated storage building for
the storage of roofing supplies and materials is also proposed.
3.3
4.0
4.1
4.2
~ 'J ,"'"
InfOlmaWbn Report No. 22-05
ATTACHMENT' 3 TO
HE PORT # PO /D'DtJ
Page 2
3.0
3.1
OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING
Durham ReQional Official Plan
- the Durham Regional Official Plan identifies the subject lands as being
designated "Employment Area";
- this designation permits manufacturing, assembly and processing of goods,
services, industries, research and development facilities, warehousing,
business parks, limited personal service uses, hotels, storage of goods and
materials, retail warehouses, freight transfer and transportation facilities;
- these uses shall be designated in appropriate locations in the respective area
municipal official plans;
- the applicant's proposal appears to comply with this designation;
3.2
PickerinQ Official Plan
- the subject property is designated "Employment Areas - General Employment"
within the Brock Industrial Neighbourhood;
- this designation permits manufacturing, assembly, warehousing, storage of
goods and materials, transportation facilities, offices and retail sales as a
minor component of an industrial operation;
Schedule II of the Pickering Official Plan - "Transportation Systems"
designates Clements Road and Church Street as Type C - Arterial Roads;
- the applicant's proposal would implement the "Employment Areas - General
Employment" designation in the City's Official Plan;
ZoninQ Bv-Iaw 2511
- the subject property is dual zoned "M2S-1" - Truck Stop & Restaurant Zone
by By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 5836/01 and "M1" - Storage & Light
Manufacturing Zone by By-law 2511;
- this zoning amendment application is subject only to the eastern portion of the
property which is currently zoned "M 1 ";
Land Division Application LD 267101 will severe the "M1" portion of the
subject property from the "M2S" portion;
- the applicant is requesting to amend the "M1" zoning of the subject property
to permit outdoor storage associated with a roofing supply business office and
warehouse.
RESULTS OF CIRCULATION
Resident Comments
no written resident comments have been received to date;
AQencv Comments
no written agency comments have been received to date;
Information Report No. 22-05
A rTACHIVIENì 11_:2 TO
REPORT II PO IÓ ._~
43'-"
Page 3 1. .;j
4.3
Staff Comments
in reviewing the application to date, the following matters have been identified
by staff for further review and consideration:
. the compatibility and the appropriateness of the proposed outdoor storage
with the existing built form;
. the examination of the preliminary site plan to ensure adequate site function;
. the examination of building location on the subject property to ensure that
the building is as close to Clements RoadlChurch Street as reasonably
possible in order to adequately screen the proposed outdoor storage
component of this business from the street;
. the fulfillment of the City of Pickering and the Region of Durham conditions
of approval for LD 267101;
. proximity to environmentally significant area and the requirement for
TRCA approvals;
. the examination of this application to ensure that it is consistent with the
polices of the 2005 Provincial Policy Statement;
- this Department will conclude its position on the application after it has
received and assessed comments from the circulated departments, agencies
and the public.
PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
5.0
- written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the
Planning & Development Department;
- oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting;
- all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report
prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent
meeting of Councilor a Committee of Council;
- if you wish to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision, you must
provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this
proposal;
- if you wish to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal, you
must request such in writing to the City Clerk.
6.0
OTHER INFORMATION
6.1
Appendix No. I
list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and
City Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of
writing report;
~ ~4
.lJ ."
Information Report No. 22-05
ATTACHMENT II
DF;'(iR1~¡ po.
3 TO
Iv. -o~
Page 4
6.2
Information Received
- copies of the Applicant's Submitted Plan prepared by Barry Bryan & Associates
Limited, and a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment prepared by Winchurch
Environmental Inc. are available for viewing at the offices of the City of
Pickering; Planning & Development Department;
6.3
Property Principal
The owner of the property is 1504063 Ontario Inc. (S. Aggarwal), the applicant is
Wencray Holdings Limited and the agent for this application is Arnold Mostert of
Barry Bryan & Associates.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
ORIGINAL SIONBo BY
Geoff Romanowski, CPT
Planner II
Lynda Taylor, MCIP, RPP
Manager, Development Review
GXR:jf
Attachments
Copy: Director, Planning & Development
ATTACHMENT I.
REPORT I PD
'i TO
lei -c,<o
.. 3,-
1. ~)
APPENDIX NO. I TO
INFORMATION REPORT NO. 22-05
COMMENTING RESIDENTS AND LANDOWNERS
(1 )
none received to date
COMMENTING AGENCIES
(1 )
none received to date
COMMENTING CITY DEPARTMENTS
(1 )
none received to date
ATTACHMENT#._..!f _"~TO
HEPORT # PD---..1.C2:.=O~.=~~,""
Excerpts from
Statutory Public Information Meeting
Pursuant to the Planning Act
Minutes
Thursday, October 20, 2005
7:00 P.M.
(I)
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 23/05
WENCRA Y HOLDINGS LIMITED
2000 CLEMENTS ROAD
PART OF LOT 15, B.F.C., RANGE 3
(40R-6080, PART 1, 5)
í9JY OF ~
1.
Geoff Romanowski, Planner II, provided an overview of property location,
applicant's proposal and City's Official Plan policies pertaining to this site,
as outlined in Information Report #22/05.
2.
Arnold Mostert, Barry Bryan & Associates, agent for Wencray Holdings
Limited advised that they were present to answer any questions and
submitted letters of support for this application from:
Mark Goreski, Goreski Roofing & Lathing Ltd.
Tony Tedesco, AMA Roofing & Sheet Metal
Tom Moffatt, Moffatt Bros. Roofing Ltd.
David Sullivan, D. Sullivan Condominium Service
Dave Barr, Roofing Siding Sheetmetal Ltd.
Segar Aggarwal, Bonamax Realty
3.
The following representativeslagents for Wencray Holdings Limited
requested their names be included as attendees:
Craig Glynn, Wencray Holdings
Wendy Spragge, Vice-President, Spar Marathon
Dana Coverdale, Director, Sales & Marketing, Spar Marathon
Steve Bronetto, Bonamax, Strategic Advisor, for Wencray Holdings
- 1 -
ATTACHMENT#--~==30
EEPORì # PD,,".._.JQ..:Q~I£_.
137
I I'
I II I
I
r;A~~~9 8 7.1445
ROOFING SIDING SHEETMET AL LTD.
66 Metcalf Street, RR.#8
Newcastle, 00, LIB 1L9
Toll Free: 1-800-987-1445 Fax: 905-987-3838
wwwbarrsroofing.com
8ARRSR~ S~é\o1.com
I
~eptember 11, ;¿uo~
The Corporation of the City of Pickering
One The E:;;planade
Pickering, Ontario, Canada
L 1V 6K7
rRECE~VED
OCT 2 6 2005
CITY OF PICKERING
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
Pickering Town Council
To whom it may concern,
I was glad to hear SPAR-Marathon MAYBE EXANOrNG TO A BIGGEF: Pickering Site.
This would be good news for me and helps my finn be more competitive. I will no longer
have to drive as far to pick up my supplies.
We have been doing with business with SPAR-Marathon for many years and have founci
them to be .3 good competitive reliable supplier to roofing industry. I am behind anything
new that they can do to improve their level of service to my company.
I also want (0 wish SPAR-Marathon good luck on their expansion plans.
Yours truly
g~
Dave Barr
President
c.c. Craig Glynn, President. SPAR-Marathon
-. -41 ~O
: -. . .l'J¡Q
!.,." -q D. SULLIVAN
". CONDOMINIUM SERVICE
DIV. 654946 ONT. INC.
;J--~.~~.~
- I ! ;
- r ! ~ -
ATTACHMENT #-.J¿_~TO
r\EPORT Ii PD-_..lg:C:12,.,."..~..~.
ft~ E t?'-& BE. [j Vì E" IF'm
¡jjfl1 ~ \í'~ ~,~ r1 ',.;", Li/
OCT 2 6 2005
CITY OF F'!Cí(ERII\JG
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
September 13\ 2005
Mr. Charlie Ayers
Sales Manager
SPAR-Marathon Roofing Supplies
3689 Weston Road
Weston, Ontario
M9L 1W4
Re: SPAR-Marathon New Pickering Site
I was pleased with the conversation we had regarding your expansion plans to a
new Pickering location.
As you had mentioned, it would allowSPAR-Marathon to offer a much larger
selection of inventory as well as increased quantities. This will be a great
improvement for all the local roofers in the eastern end of the G.TA as well as
areas east of the city.
Most of the work I do is in the eastern region and having this large facility would
make my job easier and more cost effective without having to travl~' into the
Toronto area.
I would like to wish SPAR-Marathon all the success and continued support to the
roofing industry.
Sincerely
5310 Finch Ave. E.. Unit 32. Scarborough. Ont. M1S SEa. Ter 609-0011.' 509-D1Q:). Fax 609-0564
IndustriB/ 13 9
Commec-cial
Institutional
1-888-2~!:5-2294
PrO1JÚÍmg tim.eCy, quality, roof sm;iœ wor{since 1985
125 Densmore Rd.
Cobourg Ontar'jo
K9A 4.19
Septemlber 12,2005
¡RECE~VED
OCT 2 6 2005
The Corporation City of Pickering
One The Esplanade
Pickering. Ontario, Canada
L 1V 6Ki'
CiTY OF PiCKERING
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
Pickering Town Council
To whom it may concern!
SPAR-Marathon has told me they wish to expand their Pickering Operation and move to a new
si~e that needs to be rezoned.
They telf me that they will be adding several delivery trucks and inventory to their sites. They have
also mentioned that their yards in Weston and Toronto are at capacity and this new yard will help
bring us better service.
, have been dealing with SPAR-Marathon for many years and find them to be a good company
that specializes in service and product availabJity.
We at Moffatt Brothers Roofing LId feel it is in the City of Pickering's intere~;t to re-zone the site
t~at SPAR-Marathon has chosen ~ then have ~hem move to Ajax or Oshawa.
SIncerely. ~// . .-
. / /. ø"
."",,"'-: .~
Tom MOI~tt / ~~ .
preSiden/ /
c.c. cJllÍ9 Glynn, President, SPAR Mara
140
- ..... ATTACHMENT I
~ REPORT # PO
~~7.::W~
.:::;. ~ ~
8 TO
If) "C(.:7
ROOFING & SHEET METAL
980 Alliance Road ,Unit #2, Pickering, Ontario llW 3M9 . Tel: 905-837-9990 . Fax: 905.837-8885 . Emaíl: amaroofing@Jbellnet.ca
September 9, 2005
RECE~\fED)
0 C1" Z f; 2005
The Corporation of the City of Pickering
One The Esplanade
Pickering, Ontario, Canada
L1V 6K7
CITY OF PICKERING
PLANNING 8. DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
Pickering Town Council
Dear Sir/Madam,
SPAR-Marathon has informed me thatthey wish to expand their Pickerlng operation and
move to a new site that needs to be re-zoned.
This would be a great improvement to the level of service that they currently offer with
more storage space and easy access.
, have to rely on their Weston Operation for my larger purchases and only use their
present location for smaller ordern. If and when they get this larger facilìty in my
neighbour it would be an excellent benefit to my business.
I like to support business within my community and this new site would make it easier for
me to stay within the city.
If you have any questions or issues with this please don't hesitate to contact me.
c.c. Charlie ,\yers. Sales Manager, SPAR~Marathon
......~~... ATTACHMENT #-3==~lfj
~~~~T#PD Il>-:P~. 141
øaEKI
August 17, 2005
R.ECEJVEt)
Dana Coverdale
Director 0 f Sales and Marketing
SP AR-Marathon Roofing Supplies;' .
3689 Weston Road
Weston, ON
M9L IW4
nCT 2 6 ¿OOS
." r-:. ,"'¡(""'f,FtlNG
CITY .t:tc f~[\~â.òPMENT
'"')1 AN\¡!-h." ,.,.J .-NT
.. nEPt,ÇITi-,k
RE: Rc-zoning of SPAR-Marathon new Pickering site
Feel ÍÌee to give this Jetter to the To;wnpfPickering pJanning department.
r am in favour of SPAR-Marathon relocating to a larger site a Pickering.
The added inventory and more delivery trucks wilJ provide me great service to satisfY ow'
customers.
A lot army work is in the Pickering\Ajax area and it will be easier than dealing with my
supplier in Oshawa.
If you have :any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905)723-9022.
Yours truly,
For Goreski Roofing and Lathing Ltd.
~
Mark Goreski
(90S) 723.9022
GORESKI ROOFING AND LATHING LTD.
133 TAUNTON AD, W. 1/18
OSHAWA L 1 G 4X9
;1' .w
-"-'-'-----..--.----- .----
142
ATTACHMENT II
REPORT # PO
/D" TO
10'-010
Oc1Qbcr 3. 2006
\\O~.. fl""..¡-'E.= ~ V E [j)
\0. ¡¡;; ~.# L.~'"' t3
OCT 2 6 2005
Y OF PiCKERqNG
¥~INN'NG 8, DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
Mr. Crslg Glynn
YVencI1lY HoIdi1gs lid.
010 aper Roo«ng & Metll Suppliel Limited
3689 WØI~ RoBd,
\Neslon. ON L19L 1W4
Re;
2000 Clemems RoBes, Pld<øring, Ontario
DeAr Mr. Glynn,
Furth!!!' 10 ollr OT'Igolna dtacuuiona p the seller at the BlIs located on ClementS Road at Chun:h Stl1J9l.
Pickering, Onhtrlo. we hop. to fin81iz8 on c/c9ing 1t'113 &ale ~n. ,... pll1 of your requIrement to purc:h1Øð
my ~er1Vrou have made en application fO1 rezoning ofth,land.
At detcrlbe¡j to u. in thcae dI8CUt8!ot\S iR"d 91nce you 8 lace! bUSJni!11 alrNdy, wt C<in agree U18\ your
proposed butiftee8 U8e would be ~pllble to U8 . you next door nelghb~ur.
If we C8n b~ h.~M in anyway, pleaee let us know.
Yo~:a 1r.¡ty,
V ,'At 4- ~.
Søg_l\ggalWGI 0 c.(.- c~ (~Ç-
c.c.
SsIWl~ Singh GO5o3I - RlICCloppo Zuber coet(eeI DIonne LLP
S1e)h"n Bronetto - eonaMBJr Really Inc.
DeMic Bryan - 8m1Y, Bryan Associates (1 ~91) Limited
fR~C!EI'V!f!ð
Ocr 2 Walker, Nott, Draglceltic
" a 200SAssociat9& LImited
CiTy Planning
fPLAtvN"O¡::: PIC/{- Urban OB61gn
o~c:.~ OE:VE:L8t!!~GJronmBntal Ass866ment
"FlTME:flJì ,..E;1\J1'
ArrACHME~IT # {/ TO
HEPORï il PO <._Jl~~:Db.__-----_.
October 20, 2005
City of Pickering
Planning and Development Department
One The Esplanade
Pickering, ON L 1V 6K7
Attention:
Mr, Geoff Romanowski
Planner
Dear Sir:
Re:
Zoning By-Law Amendment Application A23/05
Wencray Holdings limIted, 2000 Clements Road
City of Pickering
We are planners for Runnymede Development Corporation Limited, with respect
to lands which they own in vicinity to the property subject of Application No,
A23/05. Runnymede is also the beneficial owner of a property adjacent to the
subject lands. We have reviewed Information Report No. 22-05 and offer the
following comments regarding the proposed development.
In principle, the proposed development merits Our support, however specific
details need to be clarified and resolved.
We are in general agreement with staff comments from the Information Report.
It is essential that compatibility and appropriateness of the outdoor storage with
respect to built form on the subject property and adjoining lands is achieved.
Staff indicate the need "to adequately screen the proposed outdoor storage
component of this business from the street", however this is only proposed
through building siting and there Is no mention of impacts on adjacent
properties. As a result, we propose that appropriate solid screen fencing and
accompanying landscape techniques are utilized around the outdoor storage
area in order to help enclose it appropriately and ensure there are no negative
impacts on adjacent properties.
Furthermore, the location of the building footprint should be specified in the
zoning schedule in order to achieve the level of screening that is depicted on the
submitted site plan. It is noted that the .concept" site plan, does not provide
setback dimensions for the proposEtd development. Therefore, it is important
that an appropriate building footprint is established via site specific setbacks
through the rezoning process in order to ensure the building is oriented to the
street and side yards, thus helping tCI screen the outdoor storage area from the
street.
In addition, on the applicant's submiHed site plan, a large portion of the site is
illustrated as "Outdoor Storage Area". This storage area space should in our
opinion be limited in scale and loc:ation through specific reference On any
approved zoning schedule applicable to the property. This will clarify the storage
~4f";¡.,
J.. ~J
~}3;;:Æ
:~::::.~-:-;...../< Æ~
::-./:'/::;:/"/ /..~~ w.~
~/./~/h~~--:~~
.-:/ /:/':"'~~~-<-~%~
<'<'--""<~-~%
,- .,.:-::..::::-;:>~~~~~?,
<///~~
,..' :;.--
", 97'
172 Sl. George Street
Toronto, Ontario
M5R 2M?
Tel. 416/968-3511
Fa~. 416/950-0172
e-mail: admln@wndplan.œm
web: WWw,wndolan,c2ll!
P,I..!!. WI."', FCIP, RPP
W.n~y Nit!, FCIP, RPP
Rob,n A. Orlgle.8.lc, MCIP, RPP
PnnCpof,
J...nc.w", ..RAlc, 0.....
GIoga/y J. Do/y, MCIP, RPP
""_'0 Pr1~.
Mlnno COlley
C"".II..
I'.~ ~ it'ù... ~ nil ~. ¡¡-~
In t!= 't;,ø !I<,;. 'J """ iidI
ATTACHMENT #~ J/ TO
nC"í 1 0 ZO05 REPORT 11 PO /O'~2..-
14 4 Mr, Geoff Romanowski Page 2
City of Pickering, Planning & Development Department 05.676
area location and prevent it from spilling out in close proximity to adjacent
properties or the street.
An alternative to ensure the storage area is properly defined would be to include
performance standards in the Zoning By-Law that control the area, height, and
yard setbacks associated with open area storage uses. Below is an example of
wording that could be used in the amendment:
Part Lot 15, Range 3
Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection 16.1,3, an outdoor storage
area shall be permitted on the lands designated 'M1' on Schedule 'A"
hereto and located in Part of Lot 15, Range 3, subject to the following
provisions:
a) the use of the outdoor storage must be associated with the roofing
supply business office and warehouse operation 011 the same lot;
b) the outdoor storage area shall be enclosed by solid screen fencing and
landscaping or both as determined by the City of Pickering Planning and
Development Department through site plan contrel;
c) Area Requirements:
i) Maximum Area of outdoor storage area
ill Minimum rear yard ::etback to outdoor
storage area
III) Minimum side yard setback to outdoor
storage area
iv) Minimum front yard setback to outdoor
storage area
v) Minimum setback from building wall to
outdoor storage area
vij Maximum height of any object in
outdoor storage area
xx sq. m
;XlCm
xxm
X¡{m
¡{xm
xxm
This type of amendment would ensure the visual quality of the property is
improved while preventing adverse impacts on adjacent properties. It is clear
that if the proposed site plan was approved "as is", it could be interpreted that
outdoor storage is permitted anywhere on the subject property. From staff
comments we assume this is not the expectation.
Also, we note that landscaping on the submitted site plan is limited. The City
should ensure through the site plan process that adequate landscaping is
provided to effectively buffer the outdoor storage from the street and from
adjacent lots.
We ask that you incorporate these considerations into your assessment of this
application. Please add us to the list of interested parties to enable us to receive
/~..->.
..../..../- /'
./ ./ ./..../../
~:.......-;~./::@.
. ~/---: - .-,.,:. ~
:~~~~}.~.:~
./ /.../ .... ~..~~~-
- ~?/.//
%§~~~~~
- /~~/..:::,/
.//~
'-'
ATTACHMENT#-1L-ro
REPORT II PO I{l-L¥.?
Mr. Geoff Romanowski
City of Pickering, Planning & Development Department
all future decisions and notices regarding this application.
Yours very truly,
WALKER, NOTT, DRAGICEVIC ASSOCIATES LIMITED
Planning' Urban Design' Environmental Assessment
~~, ~p~
Associate Principal
copy:: Rodger Miller
Page 3
05.676
~ECEI'VED
411fj-
1: rlf" ~J
nCi 2 0 2005
'-"TY OF PICKERING
;;','ANNING 8< DEVELOPMENT
- rJEPARTMENT ,,/ 0
- /'o':;>;;::~~//
all/// ø
;/;>:: ../ //~iÍff¿
~~::::¿~
;..:/;/;:::::;-..~~
//.>::>;:.-:;:~.~
/;:~:?(~~
"":--;:fß~'V
4. 4\"'>
1. 0
ATTACHMENT II_. L;¿ -,='(0
REPORT # PD-"2.:.~__._..
CROSSBY-DEWAR
PROJECTS INC.
October 24, 2005
City of Pickering
Corporate Services Department
Clerk's Division
Pickering Civic Complex
One The Esplanade
Pickering, Ontario
LlV 6K7
Attention:
Debi A. Bentley, CMO, CMM III
Re:
Zoning Amendment Application - A 23/05
Wencray Holdings Limited
Dear Ms. Bentley,
We are currently in the process of developing property on Silicone Drive and will have a
view of the subject property from our facility.
I would ask that the property owner include landscaping on the north west corner of the
property to hide from view the proposed storage building and outside storage area.
If you require any further information regarding this request please contact the
undersigned.
Regards,
~ C'j' '} "1 '){J!Jf-;
U ,.. i '-' '.I
CITY OF P¡CKEfHNG
\?LANNING & DE\I~L~PMENT
, DEP,'.\;:¡YMU\\ r
~~,
4.C}.' ~. .. q;,. "" '('V.\~:ð
~ J.,. ":. (/þ
"'~. 0... '('";;. á~-;'";)
'?>. ""I' ..... '<r' ~.
~ A).)" <\jJ
~Q ~.l'l..if'4}:~"'e;.'~ .
~o:.t.. ~
~{1b, - ~.
'2'~ ..
'by-
~
Administration Manager
Crossby-Dewar Projects Inc.
, He"'" "".., I""'" ~ ~~JJ F- tf\\j
I;E..;~ tb ( 1>. 'e ß ~ r." 9d,
I) ~ f[;... '11=, ß.."," ,
cc. Geoff Romanowski, Planner II
Ian Morton, General Manager CDPI
Greg Martin, Project Manager G.V. Martin,Associates Limited
896 Brock Rd. S., Unit #8
G:\Users\Dori\Word Documents\Crossby Dewar\Dori's Notes\193S Silicone Drive\City of Pickering, ON
Pickering Zoning Amend A 23 OS.doc L1W 1Z9
TEL [905] 831.0675
FAX [905] 831.0767
The Regional
Municipality
of Durham
Planning Department
605 ROSSLAND ROAD E .
4TH FLOOR
PO BOX 623
WHITBY ON L 1 N 6A3
CANADA
905-668-7711
Fax: 905-666-6208
E-mail: planning@
region.durham.on.ca
www.region.durham.on.ca
A.L.Georgieff, MCIP, RPP
Commissioner of Planning
,,'
.",
"ServIce Excellence
fo( cìùrCo"]munities"
October 21, 2005
ATTACHMENT # 1"3 - .'fO
REPORT I PO ID&
.., 4.....
.1 (
R' E""" C' ~, E,'~ ;]1:\V" ':F'" 1\"'"
'. ,', . ,-"'" ill. 1';>7'" ~ ì1
, ,'" :,t" ~'!,;, ,M., ""'," ~:"'.'
Geoff Romanowski, Planner II
Pickering Civic Complex
One The Esplande
Pickering, Ontario
L 1V 6K7
(J' C ,,1- ? (; ? n r) r¡
,.. u "0""
CITY OF PICI,EHiNG
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
OEPÞ,RTMENT
Mr. Romanowski:
Re:
Zoning Amendment Application A23/05
Applicant: Wencray Holdings Limited
Location: Part Lot 15, BFC. Range 3; 40R-6080, Part 1,5
2000 Clements Road
Municipality: City of Pickering
This application has been reviewed and the following comments are offered.
The purpose of this application is to amend the zoning of the subject property to
permit a roofing supply business office and warehouse with associated outdoor
storage.
ReÇlional Official Plan
The lands subject to this application are designated "Employment Area"in the
Durham Regional Official Plan. Employment Areas are to be used for manufacturing,
assembly and processing of goods, services industries, research and development
facilities, warehousing, business parks, limited personal service uses, hotels, storage
of goods and materials, retail warehouses, freight transfer and transportation faèilities.
The proposed uses may be permitted within the Employment Area.
Provincial Policies & DeleQated Review Responsibilities
This application has,been screened in accordance with the terms of the provincial
plan review responsibilities. A Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment prepared by
Winchurch Environmental Incorporated indicated that there is low potentialfor
environmental impact of the subject property due to current/historic úses at, and in the
vicinity of the subject property. No additional environmental work is recommended.
There are no other matters of provincial interest applicable to this application.
ReQional Services
Sanitary sewer services are available to the subject property from Church Street.
Municipal water supply is only available to the subject property through the extension
of a 300 mm watermain along Clements Road. The applicant will be responsible for
all costs associated with the required extension. .
@
100% Post Consumer
4IAjO
J!."tÖ
A IT ACHMENT 1...J.:J==~rð
REPORì u PD___ll¿:j;!b==,"~~"~."".,
. Page 2
If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
(1 m ~ Jw1/{
Dwayne Campbell, Planner
Current Operations Branch
cc:
Peter Castellan, Regional Works Department
N : \pi mId ell 00 i 0 9 IC omme 0 Is IP i ek e ri 0 9 \A2 3 -0 5 . d oe
{' r-rN;HfJiEi\r!;/ /4-
'¡':?OR"¡ ')D....,.IÞ.~tJb
,Cönsêrvãiíon
for The Living City
,r'
'..'
R~
OCT 2 8 2005
October 27, 2005
CITY OF PLCKf..RING
PLANNI~D
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT'
-.--=
BY FAX AND MAIL
Mr. Geoff Romanowski, Planner II
City of Pickering
Pickering Civic Centre
One The Esplanade
Pickering, Ontario
L1 V 6K7
Dear Mr. Romanowski:
Re:
Zoning Amendment Application A23/05
Wencray Holdings Limited
2000 Clements Road
Part of Lot 15, 8.F.C., Range 3
City of Pickering
Please note that the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of the above-referenced
zoning by-law amendment application. Staff has reviewed the application and offer the following comments.
Background
The subject property is located at 2000 Clements Road, south of Bayly Street and east of Squires Beach
Road, in the City of Pickering. It is our understanding that the applicant wishes to amend the zoning of the
subject property to permit a roofing supply business office and warehouse with associated outdoor storage.
The existing zoning on the property is dually "M2S-1" - Truck Stop and Restaurant Zone and "M 1 ". Storage
and Light Manufacturing. The application pertains to the "M 1" portion of the property. The subject property
has been discussed with respect to other applications, namely the extension of Clements Road, through to
Church Street.
Applicable Regulations and Policies
The subject property is partially located within the TRCA's Fill Extension Area of the Duffins Creek Watershed
and a tributary of the Duffins Creek traverses the northeast corner of the subject site. The tributary of the
Duffins Creek that traverses the subject site connects to a Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW) that is
approximately 230 metres from the subject property. The purpose of the Fill Line Extension Area is to identify
valley and stream corridors that are currently not included in the registered Fill Schedules iisted undeï Ontario
Regulation 158 (Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways). The proposed Fill Lines are in draft form only
and have not been approved by the Province. However, the TRCA regulates alteration to watercourses and
any construction within their Regional Storm Floodplains.
The subject property is entirely designated an Environmentally Significant Area (ESA). As referenced in
Section 2.1.4 of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS, 2005) no development or site alteration shall be
permitted within significant woodlands or wildlife habitat unless it has been demonstrated that there will be
no negative impacts on the natural features or their ecological functions.
Site-Specific Comments
In accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 (Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways) a permit is not
required from this Authority prior to works taking place on the subject property. However, as the subject
property is entirely located within an ESA, the TRCA requires that the applicant conduct an Environmental
Impact Study (EIS) prior to the approval of the zoning application, in order to allow for protection of the
sensitive portions on the subject property. The EIS must clearly identify how ecological impacts are to be
F:\Home\Public\Development Services\Durham Region\PiCkering\A23-05 2000GlementsRd GofP 10-27-05.wpd
5 5horeham Drive, Downsview, Ontario M3N 154 (416) 661-6600 FAX 661-6898 www.trca.on.ca
~.O"""'.'<
;~l
.~..
150
.ATTACHMENT #.. I.LJ... JO
HEPORl' ii PD__.._..H¿,jdf)~,_.~",...
Geoff Romanowski
- 2 -
October 27, 2005
mitigated for the preservation of ecological form and function with respect to any proposed development on
the subject property. Given the environmental significance of the site, the TRGA cannot adequately assess
the proposed zoning by-law amendment application until the EIS has been received and reviewed.
Recommendations
in light of the above, please note that the TRCA is unable to support the application until an EIS, prepared
in accordance with TRCA EIS Guideline Requirements, has been submitted for our review and approval.
We trust this is satisfactory. Should you have any questions do not hesitate to contact Susan Robertson at
extension 5370.
~'~
Chris Jones, Plans Analyst
Planning and Development
C.C.
Dwayne Campbell, Regional Municipality of Durham
CJ/sr
F:\Home\Public\Development Services\Durham Region\Pickering\A23-05 2000ClementsRd CofP 10-27-05.wpd
/SfP
ATTACHMENT #"00" ""D"-7'::. ,.J
REPORl # PD_..!£;.:_2,,"---
J(:õRñsêrvaoon
for The Living City
November 23, 2005
"',-'11 E'",.,"',' «}',~','è ~;~,','."", fl,' '~'j,J ~\,',":"- [',J"1':,,-,
~), ,."" 'f fr""'!i!i \' ~,"" "
\'1 --,,;rdJ' Œl"",,~) " ,",,-'" " '
..., 5""
1. ,.t
BY FAX AND MAIL
.,,\\-',O"\Oiìh
i'J (j V L .,' !. VoJ
CITY OF P¡GI<ERjNCì~REFCFN 32209.05
¡:)lANNING 13.. DEVELOPMENT
,. DEPÞor-rrMEf\\T
Mr. Geoff Romanowski, Planner II
City of Pickering
Pickering Civic Centre
One The Esplanade
Pickering, Ontario
L1 V 6K7
Dear Mr. Romanowski:
Re:
Zoning Amendment Application A23/05
2000 Clements Road
City of Pickering
(Wencray Holdings)
Furtherto the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) correspondence dated October 27,2005
(copy enclosed) regarding the above-noted zoning by-law amendment application and BBA Ltd.'s
correspondence dated November 2, 2005 (copy enclosed) please note that the TRCA would like to offer the
following additional comments.
The subject property is an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) as recognized in previous correspondence
and review. However, in consideration of the existing dual zoning on the subject site: "M2S-1 II Truck Stop
and Restaurant Zone and "M1" Industrial Zone by By-law 2511, and that the subject zoning by-law
amendment application is a minor amendment to the permitted uses, within the M1 category, as well as
recent works within close proximity to the subject property (construction of stormwater management pond
and extension of Clements Road to Church Street) the TRCA has no objections to the zoning by-law
amendment application. However, prior to the issuance of the site plan application, TRCA staff request that
the applicant submit an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) in accordance with TRCA EIS Guidelines, to the
TRCA, for review and approval.
We trust that this is satisfactory. If you have any additional comments, please contact Susan Robertson,
Planning Technician, at extension 5370.
C.C
Arnold Mostert, BBA Ltd. (Fax: 905.666.5256)
Enc!.
RW/sr
F:\Home\Public\Development Services\Durham Region\Pickering\A23-05 2000Clements Co!P 11-23-05.wpd
5 5horeham Drive, Downsview, Ontario M3N 154 (416) 661-6600 FAX 661-6898 www.trca.on.ca
;ij};
'0_'
¡fC ð ~s ê (vii fío n
for The Living City
December 21, 2005
ATTACHMENT #_=~f¡Z."~-".¡lJ
REPORT # PD---'Q::.t26.._._...~
rf:~ ..X:.'" "-."";'>.
;h ~ ~",?
'..1
"
\;J
CFN 32209.05
BY FAX AND MAIL (fax 905.420.7648)
c'
t
Mr. Geoff Romanowski, Planner II
Planning and Development Department
City of Pickering
Pickering Civic Centre
One The Esplanade
Pickering, Ontario L1V 6K7
(('try OF Pilt),<EFi¡Nqi
,P;'~NN!NG 13, ()Eva.qF~J1EN r
. v DE.!')'f-n-~JI;::Nl
Dear Mr. Romanowski:
Re:
Zoning By-law Amendment Application No. A23/05
2000 Clements Road
City of Pickering
Wencray Holdings
Further to our previous correspondence, dated November 23, 2005 (copy enclosed) TRCA staff
and the landowner of 2000 Clements Road visited the site on December 14, 2005 in order to gauge
the environmental significance of the property with respect to the proposed development. Given
the current zoning of the subject property for industrial use and that the Environmentally Sensitive
Area (ESA) is now bisected through the construction of Clements Road, staff recognize that an EIS
is not required for the subject proposal. Therefore, we would have no objections to the zoning by-
law amendment application, as submitted.
However, TRCA staff are concerned about the development of Part 7, south of the realignment of
Clements Road and are of the opinion that this land should be protected in perpetuity as it remains
an integral part of the ESA within the Duffins Creek Watershed.
In light of the above, staff recommend that a resolution of council be put forward to obtain the
lands tothe south of 2000 Clements Road [referred to as Part 7 on the land severance application
(LD 267101)] as open space, in order to offset the impacts of the development of the road and the
construction of the subject property, and in order to bolster the integrity of the natural heritage
system within the ESA. . .
If you requireany additional information, please
RW /sr
Enclosure
F:\Home\Public\Development Services\Durham Region\Pickering\A23-05 2000ClementsRd Sitevisit ColP 12-20-05wpd.wpd
5 5horeham Drive, Downsview, Ontario M3N 154 (416) 661-6600 FAX 661-6898 www.trca.on.ca
.-a\
.~.
ÞTTJ\CHrv1EN1 #---12- TO
HH'ORI Ii PD. /0 -O~
151
I-
W
0 W
<{ 0::
a I-
0:: COPPERSTONE DRIVE (f)
w I
~ U
a: a:
a ::J
I
U
~
I SILICONE DRIVE ~
u
<
w SUBJECT
CD
w f LANDS~
z
0
f-
(/)
a:
w
a.. 2000 .
a.. LANDS I
0 CLEMENTS
u SUBJECT ROAD
TO A 23/05 . ~
I
. @
I
CLEMENTS ROAD :1
LANDS !
EQUESTED . I
BY T.R.C.A. .
40R-6080, I
PART 7
(f) i ~
W
0:: ~
-
:J I
a
(f) . @
I
i þ
I
.
I
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PART LOT 15, B.F.C. RANGE 3, 40R-6080, PART 1 & 5
OWNER 1504063 ONTARIO INC. DATE: JAN. 23, 2005 DRAWN BY JB
FILE No. A 23/05 SCALE: 1 :5000
CHECKED BY GR
l'
aT~'a::;cÊ~¡.,P';... Inc. and ;t. .uppu.,.. All ';oht. R...",.d. Nat a plan af .u"'.y.
200" "'PAC and ;t. .u pH.,.. All ,; ht. R...",.d. Nat a Ian ar Su",. .
PN-4
154
CitJ¡ (]~
REPORT TO
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Report Number: PO 13-06
Date: February 27,2006
From:
Neil Carroll
Director, Planning & Development
Subject:
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/05
J. & B. Bayes and T. & A. Costar
823 & 827 Sheppard Avenue
(Part of Lot 27, Range 3, B.F.C.)
City of Pickering
Recommendation:
1.
That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/05, be APPROVED to
permit the development of a maximum of eight townhouse dwelling units, as
submitted by 816 Kingston Road (Pickering) Limited on behalf of J. & B.
Bayes and T. & A. Costar, on lands being Part of Lot 27, Range 3, B.F.C., City
of Pickering.
That the amending zoning by-law to implement Zoning By-law Amendment
Application A 11/05, as set out in Appendix I to Report PD 13-06, be
FORWARDED to City Council for enactment.
2.
Executive Summary: The applicant is requesting a change to the zoning of the
subject properties to permit the future development of a maximum of eight townhouse
dwelling units fronting onto Sheppard Avenue (see Location Map and Conceptual Plan,
Attachments #1 and #2).
The proposal complies with the City's Official Plan, and approval of this application will
zone the properties in the same zoning category as was recently approved by Council
for an abutting residential development block to the west of the subject lands. The
boundary of the proposed zoning includes a portion of the Sheppard Avenue road
allowance adjacent to the subject properties. A formal request has been submitted by
the applicant for the return of the road allowance, which will be reviewed through the
City's land disposal process.
The proposed development will not significantly increase traffic along Sheppard Avenue,
and adequate parking will be provided for each townhouse unit. The City's
requirements respecting development of the subject properties will be addressed
through conditions of any future development applications.
Report PO 13-06
Subject: 823 & 827 Sheppard Avenue (A 11/05)
Date: February 27, 2006
Page 2
41 5:"'"
.1 ;:t
Financial Implications:
proposed development.
No direct costs to the City are anticipated as a result of the
Background:
1.0
Comments Received
1.1
At the June 16, 2005, Public Information Meeting
Several residents appeared at the meeting and expressed concern regarding
traffic and parking along Sheppard Avenue (see text of Information Report and
Meeting Minutes, Attachments #3 and #4).
1.2
Following the Public meeting
A property owner west of the subject lands (787 Sheppard Avenue) provided
written comments in opposition to the proposed townhouse development along
Sheppard Avenue, and expressed concern that this type of development is
incompatible with the existing detached units on Sheppard Avenue and will
create parking problems (see Attachment #5).
A property owner north of the subject lands (838 Sheppard Avenue) provided
comments expressing concern regarding the number of townhouse units being
proposed along the south side of Sheppard Avenue, the incompatibility of the
townhouses with the existing detached units along Sheppard Avenue, and traffic
and safety concerns (see Attachment #6).
1.3
Agency Comments
Durham Region Planning Department
. the proposal is permitted by the
policies of the Regional Official
Plan;
. a noise and vibration study will be
required to identify the impacts of
traffic and train noise on the
proposed residential development
(see Attachment #7);
Veridian Connections
. no objection (see Attachment #8);
Toronto and Region Conservation. no objection (see Attachment #9);
Authority
R~gJ'ÞD 13-06
Date: February 27, 2006
Subject: 823 & 827 Sheppard Avenue (A 11/05)
Page 3
1.4
City Departments
Municipal Property & Engineering
. no objection;
. the extra trips generated due to the
proposed townhouse units would
not have a significant impact on the
two adjacent intersections on
Sheppard Avenue;
. the introduction of additional
driveways may result in operational
impact on Sheppard Avenue as
the sight distance is the minimum
required for a 50 km/hr speed limit;
(see Attachment #10);
Fire Services
. no objection (see Attachment #11);
2.0
Discussion
816 Kingston Road (Pickering) Limited on behalf of J. & B. Bayes and
T. & A. Costar, proposes to amend the zoning by-law in order to permit the
development of a maximum of eight townhouse dwelling units on the lands
known as 823 Sheppard Avenue and 827 Sheppard Avenue. The properties are
located on the south side of Sheppard Avenue between Whites Road and
Fairport Road, and each lot currently supports a detached dwelling (see Location
Map, Attachment #1). The surrounding land uses include existing detached
dwellings to the north and east, and vacant lands to the south and west. The
abutting vacant lands are subject to Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2004-01 and
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 01/04, which were approved by Council
in 2005 to allow for future commercial development along Kingston Road and
townhouse units fronting onto Sheppard Avenue.
The proposed rezoning complies with the City's Official Plan.
2.1
Revised land use designations for the Northeast Quadrant were approved
through Amendment #10 to the Pickering Official Plan in 2002. The subject
properties were re-designated Mixed Use Areas - Mixed Corridors within the
Woodlands Neighbourhood, and are subject to the Northeast Quadrant
Development Guidelines.
This designation permits, among other uses, residential development. The
policies for this area require buildings along Sheppard Avenue be close to the
street edge with front doors facing the street and the height of dwellings fronting
Sheppard Avenue are to be restricted to two storeys.
Report PD 13-06
Subject: 823 & 827 Sheppard Avenue (A 11/05)
Date: February 27,2006.. 5,...,
1. (
Page 4
The applicable design guidelines will be implemented through the review of a
siting and architectural design statement that will be required as part of any
future development applications.
2.2
Zoning the subject properties the same zoning category as the abutting
property to the west provides for compatible development.
The proposed "SA-10" - Single-Attached Dwelling Zone is the same zoning
category that was approved for the abutting property to the west through Zoning
By-law Amendment Application A 01/04. It is anticipated 16 townhouse units will
be constructed on these abutting lands, fronting onto Sheppard Avenue. The
performance standards that will apply to the subject properties under the
proposed zoning continue to implement the development guidelines for this
neighbourhood, and are generally outlined in Appendix II.
Zoning the subject properties the same category as the existing zoning to the
west provides the opportunity for consistent and compatible development. The
introduction of townhouse development on the subject properties will not
adversely impact the streetscape or character of the neighbourhood. With the
rezoning of these lands, the existing dwellings will hold lawful non-conforming
status.
2.3
Adequate off-street parking will be available for each townhouse unit.
The proposed zoning contains a provision which requires the parking garage for
each townhouse unit to have a minimum length of 11.0 metres. This requirement
was established by Council through the approval of the Zoning By-law
Amendment application for the abutting townhouse development to the west, and
allows for a vehicle to be parked in the garage while still providing additional
space for storage. This provision will be implemented through the building permit
process and must be incorporated into the design of the future townhouse units.
In addition, special consideration will be given to the sidewalk siting in the
boulevard along the south side of Sheppard Avenue to ensure the driveway
length between the sidewalk and the garage entry is maximized.
2.4
The proposed development will not significantly increase traffic along
Sheppard Avenue.
A Traffic Analysis was submitted with the rezoning application. The City's
Municipal Property & Engineering Division reviewed the analysis and concurred
with the findings. Staff confirmed that the proposed townhouse development will
not create a significant amount of traffic along Sheppard Avenue, and noted that
the available sight distance along Sheppard Avenue will be the minimum
required for a 50 kmlhr speed limit.
l~~ort PD 13-06
Subject: 823 & 827 Sheppard Avenue (A 11/05)
Date: February 27,2006
Page 5
2.5
The boundary of the proposed zoning has been extended to include a
portion of the Sheppard Avenue road allowance adjacent to the subject
properties.
A formal request has been received from the applicant requesting the return of a
portion of the Sheppard Avenue road allowance adjacent to the subject
properties. This request has been forwarded to the City's Economic
Development Officer for review and consideration as part of the City's land
disposal process. A preliminary review of this request by Planning & Development
staff indicates this land is surplus to the City's needs.
As shown on Schedule I attached to the proposed amending By-law (see
Appendix I), the "SA-10" - Single-Attached Dwelling zoning has been extended
to include a portion of the Sheppard Avenue road allowance adjacent to the
subject properties. The inclusion of this land will not prejudice the land
disposal process as the proposed residential zoning will not affect the use of
the land for road purposes if it is determined to be required. Should the
Sheppard Avenue road allowance be conveyed to the subject properties, an
increased driveway length for each townhouse unit could be provided which
would allow for additional parking in the driveway.
2.6
All development matters concerning the City will be addressed through
future development applications.
It is staff's understanding that the proposed development of townhouse units on
the subject properties is a long-range plan, and that the existing detached
dwellings will continue to be occupied by the current owners of the properties.
In order to facilitate the future development of townhouse units, formal
development applications such as draft plan of subdivision or consent
applications will be required. To ensure the appropriate development of the
properties, all requirements of the City will be included as conditions of approval
for any future development applications. The future development agreement with
the City will address such matters as: siting and architectural design (to address
the applicable design requirements such as the two-storey height limit for the
front elevation of units fronting Sheppard Avenue); grading; sidewalks; fencing;
noise attenuation; parkland dedication; and contributions to downstream
improvements, etc, and will be required prior to development occurring.
Staff are satisfied that the City's interests can be appropriately addressed and
protected through the conditions of approval for any future development
applications.
3.0
Applicant's Comments
The applicant is aware of the content of this report, and concurs with the
recommendations.
Report PO 13-06
Subject: 823 & 827 Sheppard Avenue (A 11/05)
Date: February 27,2006
Page 6
159
APPENDICIES:
Appendix I: Draft By-law
Appendix II: General Outline of the "SA-10" Zoning Provisions
Attachments:
1 . Location Map
2. Conceptual Plan
3. Text of Information Report
4. Minutes from Statutory Public Information Meeting
5. Resident Comment - J. Ibbetson
6. Resident Comment - I. & C. Moult
7. Region of Durham Planning Department Comments
8. Veridian Comments
9. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Comments
10. Municipal Property & Engineering Comments
11. Fire Services Comments
Prepared By:
Approved I Endorsed By:
¿(b-J.n P~~LJ~ ~
Carla Pierini
Planner II
CP:jf
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended fo
Pickering Cit
"'" C".. rJ'
.1. u: I', '
APPENDIX I TO
REPORT NUMBER PD 13-06
DRAFT BY-LAW
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 11/05
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
... 6-"
i J-
BY-LAW NO.
.DRAFT
Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 3036, as
amended, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering District
Planning Area, Region of Durham in Part of Lot 27, Range 3, Broken Front
Concession, City of Pickering. (A 11/05)
WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering deems it desirable to
permit the development of townhouse dwelling units on the subject lands being Part of
Lot 27, Range 3, Broken Front Concession in the City of Pickering.
AND WHEREAS an amendment to By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 6551/05, is
therefore deemed necessary;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF
PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. SCHEDULE AMENDMENT
Schedule I to By-law 6551/05 is hereby repealed and replaced with Schedule I
attached hereto.
2. BY-LAW 3036
By-law 3036 is hereby further amended only to the extent necessary to give effect to
the provisions of this By-law as set out in Schedule I attached hereto. Definitions
and subject matters not specifically dealt with in this By-law shall be governed by the
relevant provisions of By-law 3036, as amended.
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
This By-law shall come into force in accordance with the provisions of the
Planning Act.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this
,2006.
day of
\ \
\ \ \
\
\ \ y-\
\ '\- \
\ j \
~~- \
\ "
\ \
\ \
\ \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
---\ -<162\
--( \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \
\ \
o~\)
~
o't
~
(j
~~
l'
N
SCHEDULE I TO BY-LAW 6551/05
AS AMENDED BY BY-LAW
PASSED THIS
DAY OF
2006
MAYOR
CLERK
163
APPENDIX II TO
REPORT NUMBER PD 13-06
GENERAL OUTLINE OF ZONING PROVISIONS
FOR "SA-10" - SINGLE-ATTACHED DWELLING ZONE
The following provisions are contained within the "SA-10" - Single-Attached Dwelling
zone:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
(viii)
minimum lot area of 160 square metres;
minimum lot frontage of 5.4 metres;
minimum front yard depth of 4.5 metres;
minimum rear yard depth of 6.5 metres;
maximum building height of 9.0 metres;
minimum one private garage per lot, any vehicular entrance of which
shall be located not less than 6.0 metres from the front lot line and not
less than 6.0 metres from any side lot line immediately adjoining a street
or abutting on a reserve on the opposite side of which is a street;
the required parking garage shall have a minimum length of 11.0 metres;
no more than 4 dwelling units shall be permitted to be attached together.
.. 6 A
1. Lf
-,
ATTACHMENT' / TO
REPORT I PO i'~. 0 ~'I --
[
\.
0
«
0
e:::
¡:;:¡
::E
AVENUE
0
«
0
a::
STREET
en
w
t:
~
:=
:I:
r=
r
I-
æ
0
a.
æ
~
C.N.R.
SHEPPARD,
0
.<
0
æ
-REET
(
~ ¡>--<
y.\G~
,(~~
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PART OF LOT 27, BROKEN FRONT CONCESSION, RANGE 3
OWNER J.&B~8AYES&T.&A.COSTAR DATE MAY16,2005 DRAWNBY JB
FILE No. A 11/05 SCALE 1:5000 . CHECKED BY CP
l'
"'°<0 o"'ca., . .
, T.'on_, En,_,.".I... Inc. ond It. .uþpll.... .., .19"t. "'a"'Yed. No' . þlcn 01 ."rv'Yo
2005 '""PAC .nd It. .u ,,¡;.... All ,¡ "to R....rva.. Not ° Ion 01 S"rva .
PN-6
TO
(.~)
,fNFORMATIONCOMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S
SUBMITTED SITE, PLAN
A 11/05
ATTACHMENT # S<
REPORT # PO /3., D
..6~
1., d
,,'...
~""'"
: ',' ,~:" t ' '.
. ."
:"~'::":"""'~~~""':'."".
, ..
. ...'
,...""":,.,.,,,,:,,"""':'Ä
.'.. "'-'.T";;,...
" ,': '.'
SHEPPARD AVENUE
. ,
'. ;, 1
. '..,;" ';
. '.
'-""¡
(
MN~' ..".,': .~,.:'.:,¡i;::~:,; :'\,7:é>':~', ,. (\: ' , . "
. ;:( ':: ' ,
, ' " ,:" '.. ' ,
. -,' .. '?;"'~', . ,,' ,
" . ..:' , -: " " ' ::", ,
" i, ..
"
" ..,' "
. '.:. :"
. ,'..,' '...
. ': '.'
"
.'
.' <
~,::" :,¡ ..' '\,
. '
, '
, ">:"::,"" ,': ::<.::j
.. ~ ':-1"
".' :" . ,
.
'. 'EI.
, ~J'
ai
'N
:' .' ': ' ,
.
: ." .< .
'.' .'
. .
: . :
. , ,
,"
.. ':: '
,', 1
" '
.'
, .
..
" :'
.'
"
--'
,
, -"
,:.j~¡:f., .,A2
--:' . ',,"
. I,
f
,
E f,,"
~, I' I
'C1'i :.,
...roo!
','
"
"
"-Ai:;
,'4"
" ~;.' B f .'
82',,'.: 83.
/'.
.. ',184;.'
. "',I '
. .
.' "',ot.
. .
'.' ,
,,:
. . "
.. ,
'.
. ,I ..
. I' .
'.
. ,
.., '.
'1,
, I.
."..,
, .. .1,
. ..
.'
, "
'f'
, ,
'.
, i
.'
,"
4B.8m
. ! .
. '
. .
(
-~-
---
, .' ,
.. ---~'I
l,
II
',1
~
THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES
DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN SECTION,
MAY 16, 2005,
166
ATTACHMEl\Jì # 3 TO
REPORT # PO /3 -. c t.,
Ciú/ c~
INFORMATION REPORT NO. 15-05
FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING OF
June 16, 2005
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC MEETING REQUIREMENTS
OF THE PLANNING ACT, RS.O. 1990, chapter P.13
SUBJECT:
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/05
816 Kingston Road (Pickering) Limited
823 & 827 Sheppard Avenue
(Part of Lot 27, Range 3, B.F.C.)
City of Pickering
1.0
PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
- 823 & 827 Sheppard Avenue are located on the south side of Sheppard
Avenue, west of Fairport Road, and east of Whites Road (see Attachment #1);
- the properties are surrounded by an existing residential development to the
north and east, and vacant sites to the west and south;
- a draft by-law has been prepared for the abutting vacant properties to the
west and south of the subject lands to allow for mixed use development
including commercial uses and townhomes;
- detached dwellings currently exist on the subject properties.
2.0
APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL
- the applicant proposes to amend the existing "R3" - Residential Detached
Dwelling zoning in order to permit the development of multi-dwelling
horizontal residential uses (freehold townhouses) on the subject properties
(see Attachment #2);
- the dwelling unit design is to be similar to the proposed townhouses that are
proposed immediately to the west of the subject lands.
Information Report No. 15-05
ATTACHMENT # 3 TO
REPORT ;¡ PO / 3 - D {¿;;
167
Page 2
3.2
3.3
3.4
4.0
3.0
3.1
OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING
Durham Reaional Official Plan
identifies the property as being within the 'Living Area' designation;
'Living Areas' should be developed to incorporate the widest possible variety
of housing types, sizes and to provide living accommodations that address
various socio-economic factors;
- the proposal appears to conform to the Durham Region Official Plan;
Pickerina Official Plan
- identifies the subject property as being designated 'Mixed Use Area - Mixed
Corridor' within the Woodlands Neighbourhood;
- this designation permits development at a larger scale and intensity to serve
the broader area;
uses permitted include residential, retailing of goods and services, offices and
restaurants, community, cultural and recreational uses;
residential development should be at a density over 30 and up to and
including 55 dwellings per net hectare (the proposed residential density is
approximately 50 units per net hectare);
Compendium Document (North East Quadrant)
The North East Quadrant Guidelines state the following should be achieved
through any development within the area:
new dwellings fronting Sheppard Avenue are to a maximum of two storeys in
height;
buildings along Sheppard Avenue should be close to the street edge with
front doors facing the street;
require new residential development to be compatible with existing
development;
Zonina By-law 3~R3" - Detacned Dwe'linas)
- the subject property is currently zoned "R3" - Detached Dwellings by
By-law 3036, as amended;
- the existing zoning permits detached dwellings on lots with minimum lot areas
of 550 square metres and minimum lot frontages of 18.0 metres;
- a zoning by-law amendment is required for the subject properties to permit
the development of townhouses.
RESULTS OF CIRCULATION
- at the time of writing this report one resident has expressed concern
regarding this proposal. No comments or concerns have been received by
City departments or external circulation;
168
Information Report No. 15-05
?
ê\TTACHiVíEiTI #;':) fa
REPORT # PO ¡ 3 -D b
Page 3
4.1
Staff Comments
- in reviewing the application to date, the following matters have been identified
by staff for further review and consideration:
. ensuring that the proposed development is compatible with, and sensitive
to, surrounding development;
. ensuring that the proposed townhouse elevations reflect the character and
design proposed for the future townhouse development on the abutting
property to the west;
. the opportunity to reconvey the previously acquired Sheppard Avenue
road widening to the subject properties;
. appropriate building setbacks, specifically minimum required side yards;
. traffic impacts on Sheppard Avenue due to increased number of
driveways and vehicles.
5.0
PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
- written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning
& Development Department;
- oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting;
- all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report
prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent
meeting of Councilor a Committee of Council;
- if you wish to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision, you must
provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this
proposal;
- if you wish to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal, you
must request such in writing to the City Clerk.
6.0
6.1
OTHER INFORMATION
Information Received
- full scale copies of the Applicant's submitted plan are available for viewing at
the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
Carla Pierini
Planner II
Lynda Taylor, MCIP, RPP
Manager, Development Review
CP:ld
Attachments
Copy: Director, Planning & Development
ATTACHMENT I L.¡. TO
REPORT # PO ¡ 3 ~ () h Excerpts from
Statutory Public Information Meeting
Pursuant to the Planning Act
Minutes
Thursday, June 16,2005
7:00 P.M.
.....6°.'
1.. 7
The Manager, Development Review, provided an overview of the requirements of the
Planning Act and the Ontario Municipal Board respecting this meeting and matters
under consideration there at.
(II)
1.
2.
3.
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 11/05
816 KINGSTON ROAD (PICKERING) LIMITED
823 & 827 SHEPPARD AVE.
.œAßI.QE.... LOT 2 7 , RA N G ~
Carla Pierini, Planner II, provided an overview of property location, applicant's
proposal and City's Official Plan policies pertaining to this site, as outlined in
Information Report #15/05.
Applicant representative Lorelie Jones 950 Silverbirch Trail, Mississauga,
Planning Consultant, was present and made initial comments as follows. Both
traffic and noise study reports were conducted for the area surrounding the
proposal. The traffic report found no issue. The noise study, still in its draft
version, identified some items for the townhouses that will ensure an
acceptable level of noise. Items related to fencing and air conditioning units.
The Applicant representative also made comments pertaining to parking for the
West structure. Tandem garage parking, with cars one behind the other would
eliminate any issues. Furthermore, they are not against delaying sidewalk
construction and providing the City of Pickering the funds to add a sidewalk at a
later date, in an effort to determine if parking issues exist once residents have
moved in.
Sylvia Spencer, 771 Sheppard Avenue, East, expressed her concerns for the
rezoning. Currently there are parking problems related to the high school and
medical center, another development will bring more. Believes that each
residence should have four parking spaces, one for each bedroom in the
household and one guest space and that the fence should be brick. Concerned
about Home Based Businesses, basement apartments and rentals. Wants the
property lots for this project to be equal to that of the first lot. The speaker
believes small singles should be built instead.
- 1 -
~.. 1"1.... (..~)
..l Ii t'
Citt¡ 0#
4.
5.
6.
7.
ATTACHMENT # Lf TO
REPORT # PO /.3- Co? ~-~ Excerpts from
Statutory Public Information Meeting
Pursuant to the Planning Act
Minutes
Thursday, June 16, 2005
7:00 P.M.
Wilma Flavell, 734 Sheppard Avenue is opposed to the application. Believes
the there are not enough roads leading in and out of the area and that traffic
studies seem to be completed during the quietest time and do not dictate the
real amount of traffic that residents face. She is worried that traffic will increase
and further hinder her ability to get in and out of her driveway. Speaker feels
that Sheppard Avenue cannot handle more traffic. Is concerned with the
amount of building in this area and also that all homes built in Pickering are
now townhouses. She feels time needs to be spent on the street actually
examining the location.
Mrs. Maher, 822 Sheppard Avenue, believes the townhouses will cause more
congestion in the area.
Applicant representative, Lorelie Jones made no additional comments.
Staff commented that Home Based Businesses could be located in any
residence however accessory dwelling units are only permitted in semi-
detached and detached homes and would therefore not be permitted in the
townhouses. Traffic issues will be looked at.
- 2-
ATTACHMENT # 5 TO
HEPORT # po-L3 - {] t.
171
From: ibbetson@mercedes-benz.ca [mailto:ibbetson@mercedes-benz.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 12:17 AM
To: Pierini, Carla; Taylor, Bruce
Subject: Zoning By-law amendment application All/OS
Good morning Carla,
I am a resident of Sheppard Ave (787) and I oppose any amendment to the
current R3 residential single detached dwelling zone.
Most of my comments where addressed last night to the executive committee
in respect to draft plan of subdivision application SP 2004-01 and zoning
by-law amendment application A 01/04 and also at the statutory public
information meeting on Thursday April 15, 2004 which is outline on page 87
last nights agenda.
Please make it absolutely clear that I do not want to see any townhouses on
Sheppard Ave east of my home located at 787.
Townhouses are not in the theme of the current surroundings and to suggest
that townhouses are now at the corner of Sheppards and Whites, that most
residents opposed in the first place still don't fit the surrounding area.
These townhouses will not allow for adequate parking along the street which
currently has no parking.
The only acceptable housing solutions are fully or semi detached.
The applicants are only trying to change the zoning by-laws as the current
city planners and applicant are not listening to the residents in respect
to report number PO 23-05. Please refer to your own staffs comments on
page 84 of last nights agenda (section 5.1, attachment # 7.
Please adjourn this matter to be reviewed at the same time as application A
01/04 in respect to the R3 housing use.
I am unable to attend Thursday meeting due to other commitments.
Thanks,
John Ibbetson
787 Sheppard Ave
Pickering, Ontario L3T 6K9
905-839- 77 56
905-695-2000
... 7i()
1. .' (;'
ATTACHMENT'
REPORT /I PO
b TO
/3-0(;,
From: CI Moult [mailto:imoult@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 1 :45 AM
To: Pierini, Carla
Subject: file A 11/05
Dear Ms Pierini
Regarding the above file I wish to submit the following comments:
OUR CONCESSION
Although we have long been on record supporting the original premise of single detached homes on
Sheppard Ave, we understand that this is no longer an option.
OUR OBJECTION
To now propose block after block of town homes stretching from #791 eastward is hardly in keeping or
complimentary to the existing streets cape and we strongly object to this format.
The Numbers
These new dwellings will sport 24 garages and 24 new driveways onto Sheppard Ave where previously
there have only been 2. Currently on the north side of Sheppard Ave there are only 9 driveways opposite
the proposed townhomes.
The Look!!!
These town homes with their almost continuous paved frontages and garages will look extremely out of
character from a design aspect, especially since they will be located in the middle of the block, and not at
the corner as is the Marion Hill development. As well in that development there are NO garages facing
onto Sheppard Ave. .
Proof of Efficacy
Furthermore, the effects of that massive development (White's road/Sheppard Ave) have not yet been felt
since construction is still in process. Traffic studies are just that - studies. The proof is in the actual
workings and we continue to have a very difficult and dangerous driving situation at that corner. Which is
to say that it is impossible to know the effect of this number of homes. There are already many drivers
who seem to regard Sheppard as a shortcut and/or a raceway and they drive it recklessly and at great
speed and seem oblivious to the blindness of the hill at St Paul's.
The Request
That there be no more than twice the number of homes facing onto Sheppard Ave than there are on the
north side in an equal space (drop the density to 30 per hectare). Not to do so will result in "an unesthetic
out-of-proportion" streetscape that will not blend with the existing street. Not to do so will undercut the
safety, sanity and the serenity of all present and future residents.
Thank you for taking the time to review our comments. We hope they will be taken seriously. I regret that
we were unable to attend last week's meeting since we were out of the country.
Would you please forward this note to Linda Taylor and any other persons who should be notified. I would
appreciate an acknowledgement of receipt of this note.
Also, please accept this as a formal request to inform us of any and all meetings and lor correspondance
regarding this application for zoning by-law amendment.
Thank you
Irene and Charles Moult
838 Sheppard Ave; L 1V 1G5
905-420-1880
The Regional
Municipality
of Durham
Planning Department
1615 DUNDAS ST. E.
4Tff FLOOR, LANG TOWER
WEST BUILDING
PO BOX 623
WHITBY ON L 1 N 6A3
CANADA
905-728-7731
Fax: 905-436-6612
E-mail: planning@
region.durham.on.ca
June 22, 2005
ATTACHMENT I '7 TO
REPORT' PO I 3 - 0 1::.
.. ".,i ,")
1. " .)
',.. "e c, 'E, "'" 0/1,;, 'V,'" IE: Dß)
R' fj~'
Carla Pierini, Planner II
Pickering Civic Complex
One The Esplande
Pickering, Ontario
L 1V 6K7
, ' , " ' -ì n n ç,
,JUÌ'ILlt¿J'.J'"
CITY °cf&~k~~~~~
?t,!),NNlciEPARiMENT
Ms. Pierini:
Re:
Zoning Amendment Application A11/05
Applicant: J & B Bayes/T & A Costar
Location: 823 & 827 Sheppard Avenue
. South side of Sheppard Ave, between Whites Road and
Fairport Road '
. Municipality: City of Pickering
This application has been reviewed and the following comments are offered.
The purpose of this application is to amend the zoning of the subject
properties to Permit the development of residential freehold townhouses.
www.region.durham.on.ca
A.L. Georgieff, MCIP, RPP Reqional Official Plan
")mmissioner of Planning
The lands subject to this application are designated "Living Area" in the
Durham Regional Official Plan. Living Areas are used predominantly for
housing purposes. The proposal may be permitted by the policies of the
Regional Official Plan.
Reqional Services
Municipal water supply is available to the subject properties from an existing
350mm watermain on Sheppard Avenue. A connection to the 600mm
feedermain on Sheppard Avenue will not be permitted.
Sanitary sewer service is available from an existing 200mm sanitary sewer on
Sheppard Avenue. Foundation drain connections to the sanitary sewer are not
permitted.
Provincial Policies and Deleqated Review Responsibilities
This application has been screened in accordance with the terms of the
provincial plan review responsibilities. As the subject properties are located in
proximity to a Canadian National Railway line and Regional Highway 2
(Kingston Road) a Noise and Vibration study is required to identify any
potential impacts on the proposal, including noise mitigation and warning
N:\pim\dc\Zoning\Comments\Pickering\A 11-05.doc
@
100% Post Consumer
.. "'} Iu
1:. I' 'f
ATTACHLŒNT# i_TO
REPORT # po-L!L:..Q-(;~"....~..."
clauses. This study may be submitted for Regional review through the related
land division application.
If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Úmßw(
Dwayne Campbell, Planning Analyst
Current Operations Branch
cc. Pete Castellan, Regional Work Department
N:\pim\dc\Zoning\Comments\Pickering\A 11-05.doc
ATTACHMENT' ß' TO
REPORT I PO /.3 - 0 b
VERIDIAN CONNECTIONS
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW
175
PROJECT NAME:
J & B Daycs and 'f & A Costa. - 816 Kingston. Ro'J.d (picke::ring) Ltd.
~ ADDRESS/PLAN:
~ MUNICIPALITY:
823 & 827 Sheppatd Avenue
~
~
Pickering
REF. NO.:
A 11/05
May 3D, 200S
SUBMISSION DATE:
1.
Electric Setvice is available 011 the road allowance:: touc.hlng this propet~y.
SeMcing will be from Sheppard Avenue.
2.
An expansion of the Corporation's plant is feqllued 011 the road allowance in ordet to SeMce: this projccL
3.
Individual metering for each ¡:nit is te::quired.
4.
'!'he following standard fixed fee costs will apply:
Service Connection Fee 1130.00 per unit
5.
Existing Corporation plant 01\ Sheppud Avenue may have to be relocated :it the AJ?pliclUlt:'~ cost to
accommod-ate proposed driveways.
6.
The Applicant must make direct applic..tiol1 to the Cotpo.~tion to obtain specific approVlll of the electrical
semce :u:ranganenu and rdated work for this project. The applicant is ca14tioQed that tcnden, contracts, or
work initiated prior to obtaining specific ~pproval will be subject to change.
7.
A Construction Agreement must be signed with !.he Corporation in order to obtaL'1 setVicing for this sire. Legal
costs wi11 be charged to tbe Applicant.
8.
All work from the þublic toad allowance to r.he semce entrance and the metering au;t.llgemc:nts musr &::omply
with the: Corporation's IeqtÙIement5 and specifications.
9.
Prior to obtaining ~ building pernUt. the Applicant shall. by ag¡:ecment, confinn açcc;ptallce of the terms and
conditions of providing electric..1 SeMce.
10.
Where cranes or material handling equipment at workers mu.st work in proximity to existing overhead wires,
with the capability of contact or coming within the limirs of õlpproach, the devdope.t:/Þuilder shall pay all coSts
for the tt:mporaty relocation, burial. or protection of the wires, Of other acúot\ deemed necessary by Veridian to
provide for worker safety and the security of the electrical sys~em.
11.
Will not attend scheduled City of Piçkenng DART Meeting for this development.
12.
Veridian Con¡"¡t:\:tions haij no objection to the proposed dcvclopment. Please fo¡w¡¡,rd a copy of first
submission civil design so d1at Veridian Connections may prepare an electrical desisn and an Offer to Service.
Electrical drawil1~s are .e:quir~.d(3~6) :no.n.!~~.pr~o: t~~!~etriclil scMcing dare.
13.
All of the above conditions of service \lIe subject to Ontario Energy ßoatd (DEB) approval.
Technical Representative - Fred Raininger
i:hO'" 421.9870 Ex'. 3255
PP/df
1;;\~fri...II\PII",lopm..\t ^rplic,¡jo., ltuvil.'lll\\>i.t..:rin¡;\21105\K2.' '" 827 Sh"p\"nJ Avon.".!oc
..7'"
, i Ö
íCðñsêrvãùòn
for The Living City
July 28. 2005
BY FAX AND MAIL
Ms. Carla Pierini, Planner II
City of Pickering
Pickering Civic Complex
One The Esplanade
Pickering, Ontario L1V 6K7
Dear Ms. Pierini:
ATTACHMENT # 9 fO
REPORT # PO / 3 - 0 b
~~~~~~o~~
CITY OF PICKERING
PICKERING, ONTARIO
Zoning By-law Amendment Application Ai 1/05
823 & 827 Sheppard Avenue
City of Pickering
He:
1:# c,;r.. ,r::: ~ 'V' r' :r= ~
:¡¡ ra... ~ if,;" II .' 1t: L"..'
1\ I' I {~" ' c¡ ,'" ",' f' 5
'~Ul.' - J ¿,¡.),
CITY OF PJCKEAlf\JG
°LANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DFPA~~¡::bJT
- vrN';J6646.02
Further to our letter dated June 29, 2005 (copy enclosed) the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority,
(TRGA) conducted a site visit to the subject properties on July 27,2005 to stake the defined top of bank and
10 metre buffer on the subject lands.
Site-Specific Comments
However, upon review of the site, TRCA staff determined that the subject property does not actually abut the
valley and stream corridor, as there is a neighbouring narrow rear lot which fronts onto Kingston Road that
is immediately adjacent to the valley and stream corridor. Furthermore, the width of the neighbouring lot,
which abuts the valley and stream corridor is 10 metres. Therefore, the distance of the subject site from the
valley and stream corridor is in excess of 10 metres.
Recommendations
In light of the above-referenced comments, the TRCA has no objections to Zoning By-law Amendment
application A 11/05, as submitted.
We trustthese comments are of assistance. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact
Susan Robertson, Planning Technician at extension 5370, or the undersigned.
RW/sr
Ene!.
. ,F:\H,?me\Publi?\Development Serviees\Durham Region\Pickering\A 11-05 ,Revised 823&827 She[Jpa~d ,°7 :28-05,Wp? , "
S 5horeham Drive, Downsview, Ontario M3N 154 (416) 661-6600 FAX 661-6898 www.trca.on.ca
~ID.\
'.....'
ATTACHMENT (I 10 TO
REPORT # PD / ~ - 0 ~
"'II... ",.,J '4
.if'
OPERATIONS & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL PROPERTY & ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
December 5, 2005
To:
Richard W. Holborn
Division Head, Municipal Property & Engineering
From:
Shahid Matloob
Coordinator, Traffic Engineering
Subject:
Traffic Analysis, Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/05
- 823 & 827 Sheppard Avenue
As requested, I have reviewed the Traffic Analysis prepared by Marshall Macklin
Monaghan Limited for the proposed eight additional residential units on Sheppard
Avenue.
I will concur with the finding that the extra trips generated due to the eight residential
units will not have a significant impact on the two adjacent intersections on Sheppard
Avenue.
The introduction of additional driveways may result in operational impact on Sheppard
Avenue as the available sight distance would be the minimum required for a 50 kmlhr
speed limit.
If you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me.
~=<~~, .~ -=-=~
Sh~-h¡d M~~~tf . c,~ J_.
S MIA 11_o5_823_827 _Sheppard_Avenue. doc
Copy: Supervisor, Municipal & Capital Works
p~1cilv1eeting Notice'
'..""',',':""', "," II
L\ I ! ;""'~:"'_:' ,}
i>.';:J¡~i oj :Jij"L3 :'Q b
Page 2
Planning Act
Requirements
Date of this Notice
Fire Department
comments
Dated:
1<§:{J{eatli
Pire Prevention Officer
œicÆ.§ring Pire Services
If you wish to reserve the option to appeal a decision of the
City of Pickering, you must provide oral comments at the
public meeting, or written comments to the City before
Council adopts any zoning by-law for this proposal.
May 26,2005
The Fire Service has no objections to the applicants
proposal to amend the Pickering Official Plan and Zoning
By-law to permit multi - dwelling horizontal (freehold
townhouses) residential uses.
Monday, June 13, 2005
179
REPORT TO
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Report Number: PO 14-06
Date: February 27,2006
From:
Neil Carroll
Director, Planning & Development
Subject:
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 24/05
Delco Homes Inc.
Sparrow Circle (at Altona Road)
(Block 17, Plan 40M-1827)
City of Pickering
Recommendation:
1.
That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 24/05 be APPROVED to permit a
freehold townhouse, common element road condominium development on lands
being Block 17, Plan 40M-1827, City of Pickering, submitted by Deleo Homes Inc.
2.
That the amending zoning by-law to implement Zoning By-law Amendment
Application A 24/05, as set out in Appendix I to Report PD 14-06 be
FORWARDED to City Council for enactment.
Executive Summary: The subject property is located at the southeast corner of
Altona Road and Sparrow Circle, and partially abutting the cul-de-sac of Chickadee
Court (see Location Map, Attachment #1). The subject property is surrounded by
residential development and a stormwater management pond to the south.
The applicant proposes to build a 25-unit freehold townhouse, common element road
condominium (see Applicant's Submitted Plan, Attachment #2). The existing zoning
permits a townhouse development; however, a change from traditional condominium
townhouses to freehold common element road condominium townhouses requires
technical revisions to the by-law to allow individual lots to front onto a private road. The
proposal represents appropriate development that is compatible with the surrounding
land uses and the existing neighbourhood. It is recommended that this application be
approved and the draft by-law be forwarded to Council for enactment.
Financial Implications:
proposed development.
No direct costs to the City are anticipated as a result of the
180
Report PD 14-06
Date: February 27,2006
Subject: Delco Homes Inc. (A 24/05)
Page 2
Background:
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
Comments Received
At the October 20,2005 Information Meeting
(see text of Information Report and Meeting Minutes, Attachments #3 & #4)
nearby residents expressed concerns about noise, potential overflow of
on-street parking onto Chickadee Court, and the proposed road connection to
Chickadee Court;
Following the Information Meeting
the City received a petition (dated November 17, 2005) signed by eight
Chickadee Court residents opposing road connection from Chickadee Court
to the proposed development (see Resident's Petition to the Proposed Road
Connection, Attachment #5);
City Department and Agency Comments
Fire Services
an emergency access is recommended either
onto Chickadee Court (preferable optio/')) or
onto Altona Road (see Attachment #6);
- no objection; however, a full vehicular access
to Chickadee Court is not favorable (see
Attachment #7); an emergency access can be
considered provided it is feasible in terms of
the proper maintenance and the installation of
no-parking zone at the cul-de-sac of
Chickadee Court (see Attachment #8);
Municipal Property and
Engineering
Development Control
Veridian Connections
no objections;
no objections, but a service upgrade may be
needed (see Attachment #9);
no objections (see Attachment #10);
Toronto And Region
Conservation Authority
Regional Municipality of
Durham
no objections (see Attachement #11) and is
supportive of the revised noise study (see
Attachement #12);
does not support an emergency access to
Altona Road (see Attachement #13);
no objections, but requests the applicant
contact them to discuss technical issues (see
Attachment #14).
Enbridge
Report PD 14-06
Subject: Delco Homes Inc. (A 24/05)
Date: February 27,2006
.. 84!1
1. J
Page 3
Discussion
2.1
The proposed residential use on a common element road is in conformity
with the Official Plan, in keeping with the intent of the Zoning By-law, and
compatible with surrounding development
The Pickering Official Plan and the existing zoning allows for a 25-unit townhouse
development on the subject lands. The subject property is surrounded by
residential development and the proposal is considered compatible with the
exiting neighbourhood. A rezoning is required due to a change from traditional
condominium townhouses to freehold common element road condominium
townhouses.
2.2
Residents' request to prohibit vehicular connection to Chickadee Court is
supported and will be addressed through the Site Plan Review Process
The matter of vehicular access from the proposed development to Chickadee
Court is a site plan matter, rather than a matter of zoning. However, considering
the high level of concern voiced by area residents respecting this matter, staff
considers it appropriate to deal with this issue in this report. A road connection
from the proposed private road to Chickadee Court is not required for the orderly
development of this area. City Municipal Property & Engineering staff also does
not support a connection from the proposed private road to Chickadee Court (see
Attachment #7) due to issues related to shortcutting and trespassing. It is
recommended that the proposed vehicular connection to Chickadee Court be
eliminated.
2.3
A pedestrian walkway and emergency vehicle access to Chickadee Court
will be required
Through the site plan review process, a pedestrian walkway will be required from
this site to Chickadee Court to facilitate pedestrian movement through the
neighbourhood.
The Region of Durham does not support the provision of an emergency vehicular
access from the subject property to Altona Road. An emergency access will be
required to Chickadee Court in order to properly address the concerns expressed
by Fire Services. The design of this access will be reviewed in conjunction with
the pedestrian walkway during the site plan review process, and will prohibit the
free flow of vehicles.
2.4
The proposed unit parking is sufficient and visitor parking standards will
be added to the by-law
18?
Report PD 14-06
Date: February 27, 2006
Subject: Delco Homes Inc. (A 24/05)
Page 4
Proposed supply of parkinq spaces is sufficient
The proposed two parking spaces per unit (one in the garage and one on the
driveway) meet the parking requirement in the existing by-law. In addition, the
applicant proposes a total of seven visitor parking spaces, beyond the
requirement of the existing by-law (current zoning does not require visitor
parking). The proposed supply of on-site parking spaces exceeds the current by-
law requirement and is considered sufficient.
Visitor parkinq requirements to be added to the by-law
Visitor parking is not required in the existing by-law for multiple-dwelling
residential uses. It is recommended that visitor parking requirements be added
to the by-law through this rezoning request.
The provision of visitor parking spaces should address area residents' concerns.
Should overflow parking be experienced on abutting streets, the situation may be
addressed through by-law enforcement.
2.5
Zoning standards will be implemented in the zoning by-law to facilitate the
proposed development
A change from traditional condominium townhouses to freehold common element
road condominium townhouses requires revisions to the zoning by-law to allow
for individual lots to front onto a private road. It is recommended that a new by-
law subsection containing the performance standards for common element road
condominium multiple dwelling - horizontal development be added to the zoning
by-law. The recommended performance standards are similar to those currently
used for other townhouse developments in the City (see Draft By-law, Appendix I).
2.6
Development issues can be properly addressed through the site plan
approval and building permit process
Desiqn
Design issues, such as articulation of the front facade of buildings facing Altona
Road; perimeter landscaping elements, fencing, sidewalks, and the design of
emergency breakaway barrier will be addressed through the site plan review
process.
Noise control measures
The City and the Region have reviewed the submitted noise study, and both find
the proposed noise control measures acceptable. The recommendations of the
noise study will be implemented through the site plan review and building permit
processes.
.. 8. t")
.1 ,)
Report PD 14-06
Date: February 27, 2006
Subject: Delco Homes Inc. (A 24/05)
Page 5
2.7
The amending by-law to be forwarded to Council
The attached draft by-law, included as Appendix I to this report, implements
staff's recommendation to approve the requested 25-unit freehold townhouse
common element road condominium development. It is recommended that the
attached draft by-law be forwarded to Council for enactment.
3.0
Applicant's Comments
The applicant concurs with the recommendations contained in this report.
APPENDIX:
Appendix I: Draft By-law
18.'~
Report PD 14-06
Subject: Delco Homes Inc. (A 24/05)
Date: February 27, 2006
Page 6
Attachments:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Location Map
Applicant's Submitted Plan
Text of Information Report No. 21-05
Minutes from Statutory Public Meeting on October 20, 2005
Resident's Petition to the Proposed Road Connection
Comments received from Fire Services
Comments received from MP&E through Site Plan Circulation
Comments received from MP&E on Emergency Access
Comments received from the Veridian Connections
Comments received from the Toronto Region Conservation Authority
Comments received from the Region of Durham
Comments received from the Region of Durham on the Revised Noise Study
Comments received from Regional Traffic Staff on Emergency Access
Comments received from Enbridge
Prepared By:
Joyce Ye
Planner I'
Approved I Endorsed By:
Neil Carra . RPP
Director, Planning & Development
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
f
APPENDIX I TO
REPORT PD 14-06
DRAFT BY-LAW
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 24/05
185
.. 8""-
1 r)
THE CORPORATION OF THE CII~~l~F PICKERING
!e;! .J
~, (~;¡;J .~
BY LAW NA... .f1'f..:~^..!.,.;.!.,.!.W".¡... ..t.~.!! ~¡
- :O'~ ',~,i' :.'.;;',1'1
-~ {,y' Ci, /r ,,'
:5 ,;',í '.:ì.,i
Being a By-law to amend Restfiêted Area (Zoning) By-law 3036, as
amended by By-law 4645/95, to implement the Official Plan of the City of
Pickering, Region of Durham in Block 17, Plan 1827, in the City of
Pickering. (A 24/05) .
WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering deems it desirable to
rezone the subject property, being Block 17, Plan 1827, in order to permit the
development of freehold townhouse, common element road condominium;
AND WHEREAS an amendment to By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 4645/95, is
therefore deemed necessary;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF
PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1.
TEXT AMENDMENTS
(1) Section 6 PROVISIONS ("RM/MU" Zone), Subsection (2) Zone Requirements,
Clause (h) PARKING REQUIREMENTS, Subclause A - is hereby amended
by deleting this Subclause and replacing it with the following:
A
multiple dwelling - horizontal:
(i)
there shall be provided and maintained on the lot one private
garage per dwelling unit attached to the main building and located
not less than 6.0 metres from the front lot line or not less than 6.0
metres from any side lot line immediately adjoining a street or
abutting a reserve on the opposite side of which is a street;
(ii) visitor parking (minimum):
0.3 space per dwelling unit
(2) Section 6 PROVISIONS ("RM/MU" Zone) is hereby amended by adding a
new Subsection (3) as follows:
(3) Zone Requirements ("RM/MU" Zone)
No person shall within the lands designated "RM/MU" on Schedule I
attached hereto use any lot or erect, alter or use any building for
multiple dwelling - horizontal use that fronts onto a private road, except
in accordance with the following provisions:
(a) Lot Area (minimum):
(b) Lot Frontage (minimum):
(c) Front Yard Depth (minimum):
(d) Rear Yard Depth (minimum):
(e) Interior Side Yard Width (minimum):
(f) Lot Coverage (maximum):
140 square metres
6.0 metres
6.0 metres
4.0 metres
0.6 metres
53 percent
-2 -
(g) Building Height (maximum):
(h) Building Setbacks:
A Despite Section 5.22(4) of By-law 3036 and Clause 6(2)(c) of
this By-law, no building, part of a building, or structure shall be
erected outside the building envelope shown on Schedule I
attached hereto, except for steps, uncovered platforms, or
landscaping features not exceeding 1.5 metres in height;
187
12 metres
B No building or structure shall be erected on the lands unless a
minimum of 50% of the building elevation of the side of that
,ø;'dC'!¡t1 building or structure adjacent to Altona Road is located within
r~ Î the build-to-zone shown on Schedule I attached hereto;
¡r ~
~ " C
For the purpose of determining the percentage of building
elevation to be located within any build-to-zone, the 'building
elevation' shall mean the linear distance measured between
lines drawn perpendicularly to the build-to-zone at each end of
a building elevation of a building or structure;
(i) Dwelling Unit Requirements:
A A minimum gross floor area - residential of 100 square metres
per dwelling unit;
B Maximum one dwelling unit per lot;
U) Parking:
A There shall be provided and maintained on the lot one private
garage per dwelling unit attached to the main building and
located not less than 6.0 metres from the front lot line or not
less than 6.0 metres from any side lot line immediately
adjoining a street or abutting a reserve on the opposite side of
which is a street;
B Despite Paragraph 6(2)(h)A(ii) of this By-law, 0.25 visitor
parking space shall be provided per dwelling unit;
C Section 5.21.2(b) of By-law 3036, as amended shall not apply;
D All visitor parking areas not located within a parking structure
shall be set back a minimum of 3.0 metres from all lot lines,
except where a lot line separates the "RM/MU" zone from a
"OS-SWM" zone, in which case the parking setback may be
reduced to 1.5 metres;
E Despite Section 5.21.2(g) of By-law 3036, as amended, all
parking areas shall be paved;
lSg
-3 -
(k) Accessory Structure: In addition to Section
5.18 of By-law 3036, no accessory structure is allowed in the built-
to-zone shown on Schedule I attached hereto;
(I) Separation Distance: The horizontal distance
between blocks of multiple dwelling - horizontal shall be a
minimum of 3.0 metres;
(m) Despite Section 5.6 of Bylaw 3036 and Clause 4(11 )(a) of this By-
law, the requirement for frontage on a public street shall be
satisfied by establishing frontage on a common elements
condominium street.
2.
BY-LAW 3036
By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 4645/95 is hereby further amended only to
the extent necessary to give effect to the provisions of this By-law as set out in
Section 1 above. Definitions and subject matters not specifically dealt with in this
By-law shall be governed by the relevant provisions of By-law 3036, as amended.
3.
EFFECTIVE DATE
This By-law shall come into force in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this
,2006.
day of
David Ryan, Mayor
4IfíI'ÆJ
ø'if
6' .;j
~ i$:~ ~
. ~,. ff ,,""".
A~ P~"1 '
"'" wr ø ff ~¡ ~
~¡&:~.. ;<i... ,i..,. ,'Ii$lli! '"
~ q~'1¡¡'¡ ~
Debi A. BerlW: ðity Clerk
ATTACHMENT # / TO
REPORT # PO It¡ -ð~
AVENUE
~~o
þ «
0 0
~ oc
PLACE
AVENUE
o~
~\Q
O~
C
I\~O
'-(\'\ V
~\\)O~
COYf-
~Q~O
Y'-
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
City of Pickering
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PLAN 40M-1827, BlK 17
189
~
oc
«
Q
æ
w
:::;;;
:::;;;
:J
VJ
Planning & Development Department
OWNER DElCO HOMES INC.
FILE No. A 24/05
DATE SEPT. 26, 2005 DRAWN BY JB
SCALE 1 :5000 CHECKED BY JV
a T~'a::::(çË~¡e,p';B.B In.. and as supp"e... All "9hts R..e"ed. Not a plan of Bu"ey.
2005 "PAC ond It. suppHe's. All ,¡ hto R..e~ed. Not 0 pion of Su'ue .
l'
PN-10
190
c
«
0
œ::
«
z
0
I-
..J
«
A' TT./H"""prIIIT # .') TO
I MUI1¡',I<.::I, ~.
REPORT # PO 14-610
INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S
SUBMITTED PLAN
A 24/05
DELCO HOMES INC.
SPARROW CIRCLE
I
---t_LI--
I
CHICKADEE COURT
~
.j
~
THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES
DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN, SEPTEMBER 20, 2005.
/J
""'"lACHr,AENT # '" TO
"'~"C¡:;,-:' fi Pi) .Jf:L:{;¿f2.."..,",-"...~.
! g~1
INFORMATION REPORT NO. 21-05
FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING OF
October 20, 2005
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC MEETING REQUIREMENTS
OF THE PLANNING ACT, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13
SUBJECT:
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 24/05
Delco Homes Inc.
Sparrow Circle (at Altona Road)
(Block 17, Plan 40M-1827)
City of Pickering
1.0
PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
- the subject property is approximately 0.61 hectares in size, located at the
southeast corner of Altona Road and Sparrow Circle, and backing onto
Chickadee Court (see Attachment #1 - Location Map);
- the subject land is bounded by Altona Road to the west, Sparrow Circle to the
north, a storm water management pond to the south, and residential
developments to the east;
- the subject property is currently vacant, covered with grass and a few trees.
2.0
APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL
- the applicant desires to build a 25-unit freehold townhouse, common element
condominium development on the subject property;
- the current zoning on the subject property permits, among other uses, a
townhouse development. However, the current By-law (see Attachment # 3 -
Zoning By-law 4645/95) was approved with specific standards to facilitate the
development of traditional townhouses, as opposed to the proposed freehold
common element condominium townhouses. Therefore, the applicant
proposes to make technical amendments to the current By-law to allow each
townhouse unit to front onto a private condominium road instead of a public
road (see Attachment #2 - Applicant's Submitted Site Plan);
..9~
l.~
Information Report No. 21-05
An ACHMENT # ,3 TO
P:::-Y';Y; i' PO .1'-1."",1-....,..... .
<!Ç! . ."'...,m",.."......
Page 2
- the proposed 25-unit freehold townhouses are grouped into five blocks;
each unit is of minimum width of 6.0 metres and there will be two parking
spaces provided on each lot, one space in the private garage, one space on
the driveway in front of the unit;
- the subject land is proposed to have site access from Sparrow Circle (primary
access) and Chickadee Court (secondary access), and no access is
proposed from Altona Road;
- the proposed private internal road(s), visitor parking area(s), and possibly
some perimeter landscaping elements will constitute the common element
condominium;
- the applicant has submitted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and a
Detailed Noise Control Study as the supporting reports for this application;
- the applicant has not yet but will need to make associated site plan
application and condominium plan application to the City for approvals.
3.0
OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING
3.1
Durham Reaional Official Plan
- the Durham Regional Official Plan identifies the subject land as being within
an 'Urban Areas - Living Area' designation, where development is intended to
be predominately for housing purposes;
- the applicant's proposal appears to conform to this designation;
3.2
Pickerina Official Plan
- the subject property is designated "Urban Residential Areas - Medium Density
Areas" within the Highbush Neighbourhood;
- the permitted density for this designation is over 30 and up to and including
80 dwellings per net hectare;
- the west portion of the subject lands along Altona Road falls within the
boundary of Shorelines and Stream Corridors identified on the Resource
Management Schedule;
- Altona Road is under Regional jurisdiction and is a Type B Arterial Road,
which is designed to carry moderate volumes of traffic at moderate speeds
and have some access restrictions;
both Sparrow Circle and Chickadee Court are designated Local Road, such
roads are to provide access to individual properties and carry local traffic;
- the applicant's proposal (approximately 41 dwellings per net hectare)
conforms to the applicable Official Plan policies;
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
3 Tn
; £¡~ö¿, ",,'
Page 3
19)3
Information Report No. 21-05
H¡:¡:-'úRI # PO
3.3
Zonina Bv-Iaw 3036
- the subject property is currently zoned "RM/MU" - Multiple Residential/Mixed
Use Zone by Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 4645/95
(see Attachment #3);
- this zoning allows a variety of commercial and residential uses, including
multiple dwelling - horizontal use (e.g. townhouses) on the subject property;
- the Zoning By-law requires each lot to have frontage on an opened public
street, which would facilitate a development of traditional townhouses, as
opposed to the proposed common element condominium townhouses;
- a change from traditional townhouses to freehold common element
condominium townhouses requires revisions to several zoning performance
standards (e.g. minimum lot size, minimum lot frontage, maximum coverage),
and some new standards (e.g. yard setbacks for individual lot) would need to
be added to facilitate the freehold tenure;
- the proposed use conforms to the zoning, but amendments to the By-law are
required to allow individual lot to front onto a private road and to address
other technical issues.
RESULTS OF CIRCULATION
Resident Comments
no resident comments have been received to date;
Aqencv Comments
no agency comments have been received to date;
Staff Comments
in reviewing the application to date, planning staff has identified the following
matters for further review and considerations:
. ensuring that the functioning of the site is compatible and sensitive to
surrounding lands, especially regarding site access, grading/drainage,
traffic, parking, and streetscape;
. examining the proposed development and any zoning non-compliances
that require technical amendments to the zoning by-law;
. assessing the limited opportunities for tree preservation;
- this Department will conclude its position on this application after it has
reviewed and assessed the above-noted comments, and any comments
received from the circulated departments, agencies and the public.
~ 9/~..
1 .,'
Information Report No. 21-05
ATTACWÆErJT #_.-",1_._TO
REPOA1 # PO /'i-Db
Page 4
5.0
PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
- written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning
& Development Department;
- oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting;
- all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report
prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent
meeting of Councilor a Committee of Council;
if you wish to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision, you must
provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this
proposal;
if you wish to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal, you
must request such in writing to the City Clerk.
6.0
OTHER INFORMATION
6.1
Appendix No. I
list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City
Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing
report;
6.2
Information Received
- full scale copies of the applicant's submitted plan and reports are available for
viewing at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development
Department, including:
. a survey of the subject property, prepared by Reid J. Wilson Surveying
Ltd., dated June 17, 2005, which shows the topography and the
location of the trees;
. a plan titled "Site Layout With Ground Floor", prepared by Suu-dda
Patkar Architectural Corporation, last dated August 18, 2005;
. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by Forward
Engineering & Associates Inc., dated August 9,2005;
. Detailed Noise Control Study, prepared by SS Wilson Associates,
dated September 13, 2005.
- the need for additional information will be determined through the review and
circulation of the applicant's current proposal;
Information Report No. 21-05
f. 't' 3 ¡
. - ,U
REPORT # PO 1'1- 66
------.-,---..
Page 5
6.3
Property Principal
- the owner of the subject lands is Delco Homes Inc. (Tony Egi), and the agent
is Bob Martindale.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
Joyce Yeh
Planner I
Lynda Taylor, MCIP, RPP
Manager, Development Review
JY:ld
Attachments
Copy: Director, Planning & Development
1:95
19,i6
t. .{),,0',3.'1 1f.3 TO
REPORT # PO /¿¡-Ob
APPENDIX NO. I TO
INFORMATION REPORT NO. 21-05
COMMENTING RESIDENTS AND LANDOWNERS
(1 )
none received to date
COMMENTING AGENCIES
(1 )
none received to date
COMMENTING CITY DEPARTMENTS
(1 )
none received to date
ATTACHMENT I L¡. TO
REPORT # PO 1'1' 06
Statutory Public Information Meeting
Pursuant to the Planning Act
Minutes
Thursday, October 20, 2005
7:00 P.M.
!97
PRESENT:
STAFF:
Lynda Taylor
Geoff Romanowski
Joyce Yeh
Debbie Watrous
- Manager, Development Review
- Planner II
- Planner I
- Committee Coordinator
The Manager, Development Review, provided an overview of the requirements of the
Planning Act and the Ontario Municipal Board respecting this meeting and matters
under consideration there at.
(II)
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 24/05
DELCO HOMES INC.
SPARROW CIRCLE (AT ALTONA ROAD)
(BLOCK 17, PLAN 40M-1827)
!QJY OF PI&.KERINQ)
1.
Joyce Yeh, Planner I, provided an overview of property location,
applicant's proposal and City's Official Plan policies pertaining to this site,
as outlined in Information Report #21/05.
2.
Bob Martindale, Martindale Planning Services, agent for the applicant,
advised of his presence to answer questions. He further advised that the
architect for Delco Homes Inc. was present and the owner would be along
shortly.
3.
Walter Dawyd, 363 Chickadee Court, questioned the number of units
proposed, the number of visitor's parking spaces available and the type of
fencing to be used.
4.
The architect for Delco Homes Inc. advised that the fence would be made
of wood and there are seven extra parking spaces planned for overflow
parking.
5.
Lynda Taylor, Manager, Development Review, advised that visitor's
parking is not required for a common element condominium development
- 1 -
-1 ('H~
, ~,
Citlf 0#
ATTACHMENT I 1./ TO,.
REPORT # PO /4~ch '.
Statutory Public Information Meeting
Pursuant to the Planning Act
Minutes
Thursday, October 20,2005
7:00 P.M.
but that an extra seven spots are being proposed to assist with overflow
parking from the units.
6.
Donna Walsh, 344 Chickadee Court, questioned how a proposal to access
a court can be considered when notice was not given to the court
residents.
7.
Mike Stocks, 359 Chickadee Court, advised that he purchased a home on
a court with no knowledge that there were plans to open this court to
provide access from another development.
8.
Joyce Yeh, Planner I, provided the delegates with the following
information:
a) two parking spots per unit is the standard in Pickering
b) a traffic technician will undergo a traffic study
c) the access is required as a secondary road for emergency vehicles to
exit
d) fire services and traffic staff from both the Region and the City will
review the possibility of access to Altona Road rather than Chickadee
Court
9.
Adam Svendsen, 340 Chickadee Court, stated that the number of parking
spaces provided within this development will not be enough for the
planned townhouse units.
10. Lynda Taylor, Manager, Development Review, concurred that parking is
an issue and will be reviewed.
11. Bob Martindale, Martindale Planning Services, stated that the Fire
Department advised that a second access is required for the emergency
vehicles to exit and, therefore, Chickadee Court was proposed as the
secondary access.
(III)
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:30 pm.
- 2-
ATTACHMENT tI .5 1'0
REPORT 1/ PO ¡'I-Of:)
r:G t;f~;, ~\~i!i ¡I:'~, [~;.,i'
199
) ;:~ t. U ';\ /
November 17,2005
Mr. J. Keating
355 Chickadee Crt.
Pickering, On. L 1 V 6 Y 4
Ms. Debi Bentley
City Clerk, Pickering,
r""='[~'{~ Ê~=ä'¡~E' t:~='J
~ ~
:j :, ¡ rì I' ?) ,AI '){' (I ,~ ~
! hi U \r /- ,) ,¿ (. ,,~) ~
J
¡ CITY OF FjIC~ŒF¡jN(;¡ ~
¡ PL'INhiNG AND ~
L..E!YELGPrv:;':NT DEô:'i'RTMENT, j'
~-""~~~"=~"'>'-"'-"-~'~"
Ms. Joyce Yeh
Planner 1
Pickering Civic Complex,
,One The Esplanade
PickerÙ~g, Ontario, Ll V 6K7
Re: Application By Deleo Homes Inc. to build 25 town homes at Sparrow
Circle & Altona Rd. Block 17, Plan 40M-1827~ City of Pickering.
We the undersigned residents of the subject area are opposed to a
change to Chickadee Court that would provide road/ traffic access to
the proposed new townhouse development. Further we feel it would
neJ:atively impact the existing homeowners.
Also we are requesting that we be notified in writing of any future
meetings or changes to the existing neighbourhood inclJ!..qi!!v!lç ~ -~~
current roadways. b CLÇJ:l!S:S DIVISiON --_J
I f¡U::: f\:O,: j , H ~4l 05 ~
Y onft tr¡nf\",' .', '" ¡I'I~'~'!"'~"'.~':";~~':"~~~,;,:,j\,~;::\',r,(,-.~,;!L.f"'~)'~'~~':~I;,:,~~,ll;j..,:
t' /'J4~><Il .".':-':"~".'"'"..,.""",,.,,;,',',,:,',:',;;v;¿~~:.::!.,..¡.t,)~;i¡"íI';i~1,~'~'~',';:'l.,"'--î
Î, ,¡'í-' ¡,'!/L,',,:',7"", ,.;:L::-:f~i;:*~'~~ :~:',~;N~'NG ?~ ~
, ¡,.,.., , ""nE "?C'OJ&POL: CtC:h~
. ~,\~-;;:\~7i:VEL' -'r~~pp~ y ~ šÊ-¡;¡-;; ._- -
Jim Keating riRit~::.~~=::':'" --'.:c.I~
, , tHUM~ flES
Name: JÎtvt Jif:,Aii N b Name:ÇU~(UA ~F~/..,fì-rJ C.
Address:35b ŒJ-,' JcJi..AbQ cß:( Address: '~Sb C*iI(KAt)EE CR-r
.~, ~éf)jN~ L'V CoY4- ~'C-l:aqlN« I oN, LJV bY4-
Signatu~l {~~~ I Signature 12" ~þ [~" L-
V U
0 (~j' '0
t.,\. \,'
ATTACHMENT' .s TO
REPORT I PD Ii.¡ -C(,.y
2
Name: HI7;VX¿¡/!/ .¿'¡;-f¡//-5
Address: 3t 3 C/r/C,l::AL>¿ € C..er; ßc/t£Æ:J".Jç ON
/ .. L/Y¿'yy
Signature ",.t4..:~1/-Þ/
Name: GAS P ~~r¿ b A I\J rv.~ MA R.. LA LA-TO. N A
Address: "3 su ct-{- t C k. A \>t: E- c..(Ju Y<- T /.../\/ iJ Y4-
Signature ~"'---L L'I ~
Name: 'ßA~RY- you~~
Address: .-:J: q /" ~ V I yJ
ó 6 / clfl{ /A I7Þ¿:' ~()l~1 L.J ~,
Signature óf:Y';::;:;,'~
Name ~L; ?~+rt~
Address: :3 ifS CAVI ú/G 0.. e~' Co l-l r+ ) Pi vi< (Wì J 0 ¡oJ, L JJ ~ '/ 'i
Signature~-~ ""I
Name- \j \ C/ïO'¿" CL-AtV\ V t-\-9':f ,~
Addr~ss: ò4-lb Ct;1-/, C.{LA:Þtb ú.Yvt ¡t..;¡
" el/ì C\
Signatufc----W---:- - ~ c,;..--..:'::' '\. ~éT-
LIV(.,y+
Name: MA\rHE:W' SUE - PiN E¡
Address: ::)4 I./-s!! (./-< ~:D/..£ f C D l( f!.. '/,
Signature ff~"
Name:
Address:
Signature
/-ìV ¿,YL/-
Name:
Address:
Signature
,IC Meeting Notice
ATTACHMENT # 6 TO
Di7pnp" 'I 'Jf)----_L':l:J2.ft:L_-- .
Page 2
f'} 0- ~
(.1 L
Planning Act
Requirements
If you wish to reserve the option to appeal a decision of the
City of Pickering, you must provide oral comments at the
public meeting, or written comments to the City before
Council adopts any zoning by-law for this proposal.
Date of this Notice
September 28tn, 2005
Fire Department
comments
The Pickering Fire Service has no objectionable comments
with respect to the applicants proposal, however provides
the following comments with respect to emergency vehicle
access.
Understanding that the site will consist of 25 townhouses
with access off of Sparrow Circle onto to a private road, we
are requesting the following considerations.
Option "A" - that an additional emergency vehicle access
be provided fromloff of Altona Road to the south west
portion of the private roadway serving the proposed
townhouse complex. The access route would have to be
constructed in accordance with municipal requirements and
have a minimum width of six (6) meters. The access route
can be designed with a rolled curb and breakaway barrier.
Option "B" - that an additional emergency vehicle access
be provide fromloff of Chickadee Circle and the private
roadway serving the townhouse complex. The access
route would have to be constructed in accordance with the
municipal requirements and have a minimum width of six
(6) meters. The access route can be designed with a rolled
curb and breakaway barrier. As illustrated on the drawing
parking would have to prohibited for a distance of not less
than three meters on either side of the access routed in
accordance with municipal parking by-laws.
The Pickering Fire Service reserves the opportunity to
provide further comment(s) at the subdivision/condominium
site plan stage.
Dated:
Tuesday, October 11, 2005
~:{.J{eatli
Pire Œ7'evention Officer
Œ1cf?.çring Pire Services
"
ATTACHMENT;9 '.f) - TO
f,[:PORI # PD.....,.l'i:ldÞ.. .
INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S
SUBMITTED PLAN
A 24/05
DELCO HOMES INC.
?!12
SPARROW CIRCLE
I
',--,urnL. ...L. """
CI
<X:
0
0::
<X:
Z
0
J-
...J
<X:
"I
1-
: I
'\
3 METRE
NO PARKING
........--ZONE CHICKADEE COURT
"'- BREAK AWAY
BARRIER
. WITH ROLLED
CU
l
I
I
.1
6.0m
t
OPTION A
~
~
I I I
I
!~
Ii
I
. i
~
THIS MAP WAS PRODUCEé, BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING INFORMATlor, SERVICES
DIVISION MAPPIN(, ANn n~"'r,..' "~DT~"cr~', ,-"'
#'
",7
,r
f
/'
.:
ATTACHMENT ,,-"7 TO
nEPOR11/ PD,__/"'¡-olç¡ .~
1
20'3
OPERATIONS & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL PROPERTY & ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
Pí .~~ 1::~ }~~; ~~ '\l ,E I)
January 4, 2006
To:
From:
Subject:
C '}2Ü:J6
Hena Kabir
Planner II - Site Planning C1TY OF P1CKERJNG
PJ.J\NN¡~;~?Ä~~,~~~g::MElfr
Richard Holborn, P. Eng.
Division Head, Municipal Property & Engineering
Site Plan Application S12/05
Delco Homes Inc.
PLAN 40M 1827 BLK 17
(Sparrow Circle)
City of Pickering
The Municipal Property & Engineering Division has reviewed the above noted
site plan application submission circulated November 30, 2005 and provide the
following comments.
1.
The entrance to the complex from the end of Chickadee Court cannot
be supported. The issues related to shortcutting and trespassing out
weigh the benefit of the access. The entrance from Sparrow Circle can
be supported as well as an emergency only access from Altona Road
subject to Region of Durham approval.
2.
The internal radius is at an acute angle which will cause problems with
traffic movement, snow plowing and site lines. Revise to a minimum
radius of 7.5m.
3.
The internal sidewalk should be moved to the south side to prevent a
driveway crossing and to serve a large number of units.
4.
The sidewalk through the entrance at Sparrow Circle is to be removed
and replaced with 180mm thick concrete as per City of Pickering
Standard P-610.
5.
Insulation is required where the storm sewer cover is less than 1.5m.
6.
The location of the storm sewer along the east boundary should be
reconsidered. Even by utilizing trench boxes it will be difficult to install
the pipe so close to the property line at that depth. There is potential
204812-05
ATTACHMENT #_L_,"~TO
REPORT # PO -_-1!:f:.:Þ6".., .
January 4, 2006
Page 2
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
for damage to the existing houses due to vibration from the equipment.
Also, the consultant needs to ensure existing foundations are not
compromised from the excavation.
Revise the restoration note off of Altona Road to read work completed
by Region of Durham forces, not City of Pickering forces.
The 1.0m section of sidewalk on Chickadee is to be removed by the
contractor and not City of Pickering forces.
All trees to be removed within the boulevard are to be replaced with
60mm diameter of same species in an approved location.
Noise attenuation fencing details should be stamped and certified by a
Professional Engineer.
Ensure proposed landscaping surrounding the seating area at Sparrow
Circle and at playground, will permit surveillance from the street.
A plant list required for review.
Ensure underground services will not prohibit tree planting as shown
on the landscape plans, especially along the east boundary line.
The benefit of a pedestrian connection from Chickadee Court, through
the site to Altona Road needs to be assessed and approved by
Planning.
The radius of the entrance curbs on Sparrow Circle are to conform to
the City's standards.
The internal storm sewer seems undersized. The connection is
450mm diameter, but the site is designed with 250mm and 300mm
diameter sewers. A stormwater management report with design
calculations must be submitted. The internal driveways are designed
with centerline double catch basin manholes and only two inlets for the
entire site. This seems inadequate, and reverse grade (V shape)
driveways can be problematic, and are not recommended.
Access to the private children's play area, adjacent to Block S requires
the residents to leave the site and enter via Chickadee Court. The
area will not be private if the general public can use it.
Consideration should be given to install decorative wrought iron
fencing .around the west edge of the Chickadee Court road allowance.
S 12-05
~nTACHMENT #_~,.:Z,.- "..,TO
..';:¡:'(''1 ! or: !?i:9J(? ',.
January 4, 2006
11')05
" .
:'.4', \,
Page 3
19.
Is fencing proposed around the landscaped area in the northwest
corner or is it open to the public.
RH:ko
Copy: Director, Operations & Emergency Services
Supervisor, Capital Works & Engineering
Supervisor, Development Control
fI)'. rJi. r<
:" ~ 1 n
.~TTACHMENT ¡C.Ji..=~TO
RfPOHl' f! 1i¡.:Pb
Yeh,Joyce
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Holborn, Richard
January 12, 2006 3:42 PM
Yeh,Joyce
RE: Emergency Vehicle Access @ Altona Road
I understand what Rex is saying and it's probably quite valid. Having control is
preferable.
No Parking works when it's enforced and that can be challenging but do-able.
We do remove snow from turning circles as a fill in service after major snow falls, so
this would have to be a priority street.
I would still need traffic and Operations to hammer out the
would need to see the design suggested by the developer. If
and sent to me, traffic and operations can meet on site and
requirements as well as no parking zones.
details and feasibility, and
a design can be put together
determine maintenance
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: Yeh, Joyce
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 2:45 PM
'~o: Holborn, Richard
~ubject: FW: Emergency Vehicle Access @ A1tona Road
Hi Richard,
Happy New Year!
Thank you for your comments on emergency access issues.
In addition to the comments received from the Region, our Fire Services (Rex Heath) has
expressed his preference of having the emergency access at Chickadee Court because it is
a municipal road and the City can make sure of the proper maintenance of it, as opposed
to Altona Road which we have no control over at all. As illustrated on the drawing that
Rex has provided us with, parking would have to be prohibited for a distance of at least
three metres on either side of the access route (emergency access), in accordance with
municipal parking by-laws. A municipal parking by-law has to be passed and "no-parking"
signs have to be installed at the proper location on the Chickadee Court.
As to the snow pile in the winter. ....1 don't know whether this is something that we have
control over and can be overcome?
How difficult would it be to remove the snow from the centre of the Court?
~ould you suggest me to contact Steve Forsey for this matter?
oyce
ps. if it is necessary, I will contact the Region again to challenge their comment.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kabir, Hena
Sent: January 11, 2006 12:40 PM
To: Yeh, Joyce
Subject: FW: Emergency Vehicle Access @ Altona Road
hey Joyce,
this is Richards response to the emergency access .. now tell me what am I to do with
this ...
thanks for pinpointing Richards comment to me ..
hena
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Holborn, Richard
> Sent: January 11, 2006 12:34 PM
> To: Kabir, Hena
1
ATTACHMENT #,..~~".g",.,"J,(
'1EPOpí f! pr¡ t'i .òb
tNi.': C E j V E ~O7
0 CT 6 2005
~
VE RI D IAN
CONNECTIQN$
CITY OF PICKER
PLANNING & DEVELOPJ~¥
OEPARTtV¡ENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW
I PROJECT NAME:
]
Delc~) Homt:~ Inc.
ADDRESS/PLAN:
Sparrow Cítcle - 'Bloçk 17, Plan 40M-1827
I MUNICIPALITY:
Pickering
REF NO.:
A 24/05
SUBMISSION DATE:
September 29, 200S
1.
Electric Se:r:vice is available on the road allowance(s) to\\crnng this property.
ScIVicing will be: from Sp:mow Circ.:te.
2.
An extension of the Corporation's underground plant is required on rhe road allowance in order to se:r:vice this
project.
3.
Th~ applicant must prov1de accommodation 011 site for the Cotporation'. traosformer($).
4.
Tndividual metering for each \lnit is required.
5.
The: Applícant must provide a concrete encascd looped undergro~d duct system from a supply point(s) ¡\~
Sparrow Circle to a transformer 10catj(m(~) on ¡he property.
6.
The Applicant muSt pay the Corporation's costs to supply and imt¡¡11 underg¡:ound service cables along th~ toùte
()f S. above.
7.
The following stand:trd fixed fee com will apply:
Service: Connecti()n Fee $130.00 per \uUt.
8.
1'he Applicant roUSt make dircct application to t.he Corporation to obtain specific approval of the electrical
setVice anangcmcnts and relaled work for this project. The applicant is cautioned that tenders, contracts, or work
initiated prior to obtaining specific approy¡¡l win be subject to change.
9.
A Construction Agreemenr muSt be signed with the Corpol~ciol1 in order to obtain servicing for this site. Lega]
ç()~I:& will be charge.d to the Applic¡¡nt.
10.
A Multi-Tenant Agrec:mc:nt mqst be entered into anù may be registered on nth: ¡¡~ p¡\r!: of the setVicing
reqL\Ï:rements. Legal costs for rhjs will be chargcd to the: Applicant.
11.
.All work from the: public: road allowance to the service entrance and the metering arrangcmt:nt~ must comply
with the Corporation's requirements and specifications.
12.
The Applicant will be required to glllnl: to the Corporation Ii St.¡\ndard OCC\lpation t:asement, registered on litle,
for high voltage: cable, low voltage c¡¡blt: and/ or transformt:r.
13.
Plior W òbrllining a buiJding permit, the Applicant shall, by ~gteement, confÏfm acceptance ()f the terms and
conditions of providing cleètxical setVÏce.
20'8
} - 9
REFORï II PD"j'i,:(;,'tç,
14.
W'hcrc: cranes or material handling equipmcnt or workers must work in ptox.iInity [0 ~j~til1g ovcrhc:ad wires,
with the capability of contact or coming widùn the lim.itli of approach, the developer/builder shall pay all coM.s
for the: tc:mpor;uy J:Clocation, burial. or prore¡:Üon of rhe: wires, or other action deemed necessary hy V<::cicli¡m to
provide for worker safety and the security of the electrical system.
15.
Landscaping, specifically ttees/shrubs/othtr should be relocated <lW<lY from the Corporation's transfonner W
avoid intt:rfc:n:ncc: with equipment access.
16.
Vendian Co11nc:ctio11s has 110 objection to the proposed development. Plt;¡sc: fotW""rù a copy of first submission
civil design so [hat Vecidi¡¡n Coom:ctiol1$ may prepare an electrical design and a11 Offer to Service. Electrical
dtau.1ng~ an: rc:quirc:d (6) mo11ths prior to electrical servicing date.
17.
.AlI of the ab(lve conditions or sclvicc arc subject to Ontario Energy Board (OEB) rules, regulations and/or
approval.
Tecll1ùcal Representative:
Tdtl'hont: 905-427-9870
F ted Rainingef
Ext. 3255
If
PP/df
1','\11'""""11\1),,."1<.'1'111','"1 "pl'ln"'t",,, ~l"VI\",\I'icl<"rin¡;\~XI;\I)l"k,' Ih.n<1l . ~J."IT'OW C'I\'I",I,.'"
Page 2 of 2
V<::.d.dian Col1l1ectiom Pr:\Telopment Applicadon Review
Form #ECOOOZ
Rev. Date -July 21,2005
ATTACHMENT# /0
. C REPORì # PD~7;:{'?k.,
.~., ðñsêrvaoon _..............
for The Living City
October 21, 2005
i' . "" -J";;;-'QP" ---p f'\ 0
, !'E3L,;eI"~,' r;;:,1';\.:\",::'f, f,::'7
r,¡ '& !b9 íf,... !'J'~ ,þ", > ij
. ~
<
OCT 1. (3 2005 i
I
\
t, CITY OF PICKERING
PLANNING AND ,
DEVELOPMENT DEPAHTMENT ,
7
BY FAX AND MAIL
Ms. Joyce Yeh, Planner I
City of Pickering
Pickering Civic Centre
One The Esplanade
Pickering, Ontario
L 1V 6K7
Dear Ms. Yeh:
Rs:
Zoning By-law Amendment Appiication A/24/05
Deleo Homes Inc.
Sparrow Circle, Block 17, Plan 40M-1827
City of Pickering
Please note that the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of the above-referenced
zoning by-law amendment application. Staff at the TRCA has reviewed the application and offers the
following comments.
Background
The subject property is within an approved plan of subdivision (Plan 40M-1827), located on Block 17, west
of Chickadee Circle, on the east side of Altona Road, south of Finch Avenue in the City of Pickering. It is our
understanding that the applicant wishes to amend zoning by-law 3036, as amended, to permit the
townhouses, approved in Block 17, to front onto a private road.
Comments
TRCA staff defer a detailed technical review of the stormwater management for the proposed development
to the City of Pickering. However, we request written confirmation from the City, upon completion of their
review, indicating whether the City is satisfied that the proposed stormwater management plan for the
proposed development is in accordance with the overall SWM scheme set out in the Block Plan.
Recommendations
In light of the above, the TRCA has no objections to the zoning by-law amendment application, subject to
me above-referenced issue being addressed.
We trust that these comments are of assistance. If you have any additional questions, please contact Susan
Robertson, Planning technician at extension 5370.
nW/sr
C:.\Sus<;In\A24-05 SparrowCircie CofP 1O~21-05.wpd
5 5horeham Drive, Downsview, Ontario M3N 154 (416) 661-6600 FAX 661-6898 www.trca.on.ca
m<
;~~
'._,'
~"n
ít.. )" .
The Regional
Municipality
of Durham
Planning Department
605 ROSSLAND ROAD E
4TH FLOOR
PO BOX 623
WHITBY ON L 1 N 6A3
CANADA
~05-668-7711
Fax: 905-666-6208
E-mail: planning@
region.durham.on.ca
www.region.durham:on.ca
A.L. Georgieff, MCIP, RPP
Commissioner of Planning
October 26, 2005
ATTACHMENT #,_,~lL~...~.TO
REPORT 1/ PO ._-.L'L:t2f¿...,.""".....
C" 1!.'ifE""';'\
'0 e""" G ,,1::. ~l
j""'¡'l 'L~;'" ,..~
~ç:, " 1f""1t-
~,..... '1J
Joyce Yeh, Planner I
Pickering Civic Complex
One The Esplande
Pickering, Ontario
L1V 6K7
OCT 2 '6 21j(\Ç)
- "., """'",'ï=';:i\NG
"""¡j'f 01"=,1"' \'..1,-.-., MEN1
\.II ,-:,~ &. DEVELOP, .
?!.J"'Nt.I.~Ëp 1,p7MEtTr
Dear Ms Yeh:
Re:
Zoning Amendment Application A24/05
Applicant: Delco Homes Incorporated
Location: Block 17, 40M-1827
Southeast corner of Altona Road and Sparrow Circle
Municipality: City of Pickering
This application has been reviewed and the following, comments are offered.
The purpose of this application is to amend the existing zoning of the subject property
to permit townhouses to front onto a private road.
Reaional Official Plan
The lands subject to this application are designated "Living Area" in the Durham
Regional Official Plan. Living Areas are to be used predominantly forhousing ,
purposes. The proposed use ma¥ be permitted in the Living Area.
Provincial Policies & Deleaated Review Responsibilities
This application has been screened in accordance with the terms of the provincial
plan review responsibilities. A Detailed Noise Study prepared by SS Wilson
Associates Incorporated provides calculations and recommendations that appearto
meet the requirements of the Region of Durham and the Guidlines of the Ministry of
the Environment. The agreement for this development should contain the necessary
provisions to ensure implementation of the noise attenuation measures and warning
clauses as reçommended in the report. '
A Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, 'prepared by Forward Engineering and
Associates Incorporated, indicates that there are no environmental concerns identified
at the subject site., '
Reaional Services
Municipal water supply and sanitary sewer services are available to the site~
@
100% Post Consumer
ATTACHMENT iI_ll <"",.:0 211
REPORT # PO /4 -ob."._,:--,- Page 2
If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Q W1 ~ JwtI{
Dwayne Campbell, Planner
Current Operations Branch
cc:
Peter Castellan, Regional Works Department
N :\pi mldclZoninglCommen IsIPi ckeringlA2 4.05 .doc
The Regional
Municipality
of Durham
. Planning Department
605 ROSSLAND ROAD E
4TH FLOOR
PO BOX 623
WHITBY ON L 1 N 6A3
CANADA
905-668-7711
Fax: 905-666-6208
E-mail: planning@
region.durham.on.ca
www.region.durham.on.ca
A.L. Georgieff, MCIP, RPP
Commissioner of Planning
212.
ATTtICHMEN7 # -.L6~,....,,=.Tt:
REPORT # PO iLl-ore
Joyce Yeh, Planner I - --,,~.
Pickering Civic Complex
One The Esplande
Pickering, Ontario
L 1V 6K7
:J
f~
\; '.: '.
Dear Ms Yeh:
Re:
CITY OF P¡CrZf..:F1H;¡C3¡
PLANNiNG & DEVELOPMENT
OEPÞ,RTMENT
Zoning Amendment Application A24/05
Applicant: Delco Homes Incorporated
Location: Block 17,40M-1827
Southeast corner of Altona Road and Sparrow Circle
Proposal: To permit townhouses to front onto a private road
Municipality: City of Pickering
The Region has reviewed the revised noise study for the above-noted application and
the following comments are offered.
As the subject property is adjacent to Altona a Road, a Detailed Noise Control Study
was. prepared by SS Wilson Associates (Report W AO5-041 , Revision1) to identify any
potential impacts on the proposal, including noise mitigation and warning clauses.
The noise study suggests a2.2 metre high sound barrier flanking and along the rear
of the proposed Block S- Unit 10. No noise control measures are recommended
along the Altona Road frontage as the Outdoor Living Areas are situated at the front
of the units. The study also suggests appropriate warning clauses regarding the
outdoor and indoor sound levels from noise sources.
The study provides calculations and recommendations that would appear to meet the
requirements of the Region of Durham and the Guidelines of the Ministry of the
Environment. The City of Pickering should ensure that the agreementfor this
devèlopment contains the necessary provisions to ensure the implementation of the
noise attenuation measures and warning clauses as recommended in the report.
If you have any questions.or require further information, please do not hesitate to '
contact me.
f1m~JMI{
Dwayne Campbell, Planner
. Current Planning
cc: .
Peter Castellan, Regional Works Department
(Ð
100% Post Consumer
,'i'fACH¡VIEm tr_i~.,_TG
HEPORT # PD. i4:0~_,~.,"._..
213'
Yeh,Joyce
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Jeff Almeida [Jeff.Almeida@region.durham.on.ca]
January 6, 2006 10:38 AM
Yeh, Joyce
Emergency Vehicle Access @ Altona Road
Hi Joyce,
Further to our discussion, the Region is not in support of an emergency
access to Altona Road for the Delta Homes development at the corner of
Altona Road and Sparrow Circle. Primary access is from Sparrow Circle
and an emergency access can be provided from Chickadee Court.
Should you require any further assistance, please feel free to contact
me.
Thanks,
Jeff Almeida
Transportation Infrastructure
Works Department
The Regional Municipality of Durham
1
214
" (!H'I~n.l'í,,:I\,17, ,~" ",/4,' T,O,
,".1, d,' ^ .' '~..~_.~,..~
:;E?ORf ìi PD~.
October 25, 2005
JOYCE YEH
CITY OF PICKERING
PICKERING CIVIC COMPLEX
ONE THE ESPLANADE
PICKERING ON L 1V 6K7
Dear Sirs:
ENBRIDGE
ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC.
500 Consumers Road
North York ON M2J 1P8
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 650
Scarborough ON M 1 K 5E3
RE:
FILE: A 24/05 - ZONING BY LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION
DELCO HOMES
Enbridge Gas Distribution has no objections to the development as proposed.
However, should the applicant consider the use of natural gas for this
development, Enbridge requests the developer contact us at their earliest
convenience to discuss installation and clearance requirements for service and
metering facilities.
Please note that, while Enbridge has no objection to the proposed development,
a potential conflict does exist with our gas main circling Chickadee Court.
Please submit a drawing for markup before proceeding with any construction.
Yours truly,
./) í
6JvJ'/."i //
It '
I ,
í /
L8<1ndy Wilton
Manager, Network Analysis
Distribution Planning
(416) 758-7966
(416) 758-4374 - FAX
RW:swc
"""" ,'f¡.,g ~~ ~~
\t'~. E~ ~ \\ìØ,' ~ IÇ.", 'a"Ø
i ~~~,
1/j rØ'
0 C\' 7- '7 2\JGS
, " C'¡f(;,:'i~iNG
.', -"'~ . >, ;" .
""~T~¡ cH- \ ~~'~L.OPMEN1
Vi NING 8< D.~ ... "1'
?U),N !"""'::>!l.f?ïMf..N,
\.)1:",' .
tf~~
~OO(')'<? ~p"
<:~~t)~, t,,"1<~~~
'QT~ V/
, ~),~~.
'1~-irQ
215
REPORT TO
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Report Number: PD 16-06
Date: February 27, 2006
From:
Neil Carroll
Director, Planning & Development
Subject:
Direction on City Staff Involvement on an
Appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board
Committee of Adjustment Decision on Application PICA 55/05
Pickering Auto Body Ltd.
1968 Notion Road
(North Part of Lot 17, Concession 1)
City of Pickering
Recommendation:
1.
That the Ontario Municipal Board be advised that City Council supports the
decision of the Committee of Adjustment refusing the variance to reduce the
required parking spaces for PICA 55/05 at 1968 Notion Road.
That the appropriate City staff attend the March 20, 2006, Ontario Municipal
Board hearing in opposition of the application and to advance Council's support
of the Committee of Adjustment decision.
2.
Executive Summary: Pickering Auto Body Ltd., desires to expand its existing
facility located on the west side of Notion Road. To accommodate its plans a variance
to the City's Zoning By-law is necessary to permit a reduction in the number of required
parking spaces.
Planning & Development staff recommended refusal of the requested variances. The
staff report to the Committee of Adjustment stated the variance is major and the
proposal represents over-development of the site. The Committee of Adjustment
refused the variance, and Pickering Auto Body appealed the decision of the Committee
of Adjustment to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMS).
The purpose of this report is to seek Council direction respecting their position at the
OMS hearing scheduled for March 20, 2006.
It is recommended that Council provide direction to staff to defend the Committee of
Adjustment's refusal decision at the OMB hearing.
Financial Implications: Attendance at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing will
involve staff time for preparation and attendance.
~!o'?t PD 16-06
Subject: 1968 Notion Road (PICA 55/05)
Date: February 27, 2006
Page 2
1.0
Background
Location
The subject property is located on the west side of Notion Road, five properties
south of the corner of Kingston Road and Notion Road. Detached dwellings are
located to the west, while industrial/commercial type uses are located to the north,
south, and east (across Notion Road) of the site, including a cemetery (see
Attachment #1 - Location Map).
Official Plan and Zoninq
The subject property is designated 'Living Area' in the Region of Durham Official
Plan and designated 'Mixed Employment' in the City of Pickering Official Plan.
The property is zoned 'MC-15' - Industrial - Commercial Zone in By-law 3036, as
amended by By-law 5940/02. The 'MC-15' zoning permits an array of
industrial-commercial uses. The zoning also permits lawful uses existing on the
lands designated 'MC-15' on the date of passing of the By-law [Section 5(2)U)(i)].
deeming them to comply with the provisions of By-law 3036, as amended.
Further, the by-law requires that any alterations, additions, or new development on
the lands shall comply with all the performance standards set out in the by-law
(see Attachment #4 - Copy of Zoning By-law 5940102).
Committee of Adjustment Application
On October 19, 2005, the Committee of Adjustment considered an application
submitted by Pickering Auto Body Ltd. located at 1968 Notion Road to permit a
minimum of 11 parking spaces and a minimum parking setback of 1.6 metres
from Notion Road in order to facilitate an addition to the existing auto body shop
(see Attachment #2 - Applicant's Initial Submitted Plan and Attachment #3 -
Applicant's Revised Submitted Plan and Elevations). .
The zoning by-law requires a minimum of 29 parking spaces and a minimum
parking setback of 3.0 metres for the development proposed by the applicant.
City Planning Staff recommended refusal of the application (see Attachment #5 -
Planning Staff's Report to the Committee of Adjustment of October 19, 2005).
Committee of Adjustment Decision
The Committee of Adjustment tabled the application at its October 19, 2005
meeting at the request of the applicant's agent. The applicant's agent advised
that the site design had changed, thereby altering the requested variances
(see Attachment #6 - Minutes from the October 19, 2005 Committee of
Adjustment Meeting).
Report PD 16-06
Subject: 1968 Notion Road (PICA 55/05)
Date: February 27, 20m2! 7
Page 3
On November 9, 2005, the Committee of Adjustment lifted PICA 55/05 from the
table. A revised application proposed the provision of 21 parking spaces, whereas
the by-law requires a minimum of 29 parking spaces for the revised proposal. The
additional 10 proposed parking spaces were introduced 'in a parkade structure'
located below the rear addition. The variance for parking area setback from Notion
Road was deleted. .
City Planning Staff recommended refusal of the revised application
(see Attachment #7 - Planning Staffs Revised Report to the Committee of
Adjustment and the Applicant's Revised Submitted Plan). The applicant
requested that the Committee of Adjustment table the application a second time,
as he had revised the site design again to scale down the building addition and
increase parking so that a smaller variance for parking would be required.
The Committee of Adjustment refused the application and advised the applicant
that he should submit a new application to deal with his development revisions
(see Attachment #8 - Minutes from the November 9, 2005 Committee of
Adjustment Meeting and Attachment #9 - Committee of Adjustment's decision on
the subject application at the November 9, 2005 meeting).
Appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board
The applicant has appealed the Committee of Adjustment's refusal decision to the
OMB, and a hearing date has been set for March 20, 2006. The appellant has
indicated that he will be pursuing approval of a further revised plan at the
hearing. However the City has not received a formal notice of amendment to the
application from either the applicant or the OMB.
Consequently, it is our understanding that the hearing will be based on the
applicant's first revised plan that proposed 21 parking spaces, as refused by the
Committee of Adjustment (see Attachment #10 - Copy of the letter of appeal to
the OMB from Zaheer Beg and Applicant's Revised Plan).
The purpose of this report is to establish a Council position on this matter at
the aMB.
2.0
Analysis
Staff Position
Staff advised in both reports to the Committee of Adjustment that the requested
reduction in parking to accommodate construction of an addition to the existing
auto body shop is not minor in nature, nor is it conducive to the desirable or
appropriate development of the site. The reduction in parking would aggravate the
on-site parking situation and facilitate overdevelopment of the property.
218
Report PO 16-06
Subject: 1968 Notion Road (PICA 55/05)
Date: February 27,2006
Page 4
The introduction of new floor area creates the need for more parking and reduces
the site area available for parking purposes. The resultant development condition
proposed by the applicant does not provide adequate on-site parking to serve an
auto body shop operation thereby making the proposed development
inappropriate and undesirable.
Auto body shop operations typically require all the parking spaces required by
the zoning by-law, if not more. Extra parking spaces are often required for
vehicles being worked on, waiting to be worked on, or waiting to be picked-up.
Therefore, a reduction from the minimum required parking space provision is not
considered appropriate.
Planning Staff support the redevelopment of this property provided the plan
meets the current zoning by-law provisions of By-law 3036, as amended by
By-law 5940/02.
City Staff should attend the OMB hearing set for March 20, 2006 to support the
Committee of Adjustment decision and advance the principle of supporting
appropriate development. If a City position is not advanced at the OMB hearing,
the Committee of Adjustment's decision will not be defended.
Attachments:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Location Map
Copy of Zoning By-law 5940102
Applicant's Original Submitted Plan
Applicant's Revised Submitted Plan and Elevations
Planning Staffs Report to the Committee of Adjustment of October 19, 2005
Minutes from the October 19, 2005 Committee of Adjustment Meeting
Planning Staff's Revised Report to the Committee of Adjustment of
November 9, 2005 and the Applicant's Revised Submitted Plan
Minutes from the November 9, 2005 Committee of Adjustment Meeting
Committee of Adjustments decision on the subject application at the
November 9,2005 meeting
Copy of the letter of appeal to the OMB from Zaheer Beg and Applicant's
Revised Plan
8.
9.
10.
Report PO 16-06
Subject: 1968 Notion Road (PICA 55/05)
Date: February 27,2006 21 9
Page 5
Prepared By:
ROSS£.~ R:f?
Principal Planner, Development Review
GXR:ld
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
\
ration of
Approved / Endorsed By:
Neil Carroll,
Director, Planning & Development
220
ATTACHMENT#----L----ro
REPORT # PO ¡L, "öb
CRESCENT
0
a:::
m
w
:J
-'
m
FINCH AVENU
0
~
0
a:::
PICKERING
City of Pickering
I'.
:
¡
.1
II
I.:.'
:
¡I
Planning & Development Department
ROAD
w
;:::
a:::
0
. -'-.""-" --"'--"'"
I
. "'--"""""'--"'-
! ;~
I :
. <J
I :~
j L.~
'"
~
.
I
.
I
i I~
! I@
I I
i
i j
i ÇJ
. ~
!!~
I J@ "'"
~ iÞ "~:
¡::ill
~i
. !
II
. I
I !
¡I
. i
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CONCESSION 1, NORTH PART LOT 17
OWNER PICKERING AUTO BODY LTD. DATE SEPT. 27, 2005 DRAWN BY JB
FILE No, PICA 55/05
w
;:::
a:::
0
:;:
w
5
I
f-
:J
0
(/)
f-
a:::
:J
0
U
I
(/)
a:::
~
:::;;
w
0
0
a:::
m
z
«
m
w
0
Vi
z
a:::
:J
m
PARKWAY
SCALE 1 :5000
CHECKED BY RP
0 T~ro~:;cË~;.,p"", Inc. end as supp"o", All ri.hts R...,.od, Not 0 pion of sur.oy,
2005 "PAC end its supp"o,., All r; hts R.s.~.d, Not 0 pron of Sur.. .
l'
PN-9
a
I(ç, ~.Qk;'
t)')~
(. i- .1
APPLICANT'S INITIAL PLAN
11 PARKING SPACES
INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED PLAN
PICA 55/05 -
PICKERING AUTO BODY LTD.
To permit a minimum of 1.6 metre parking
setback to an accessible space
abutting Notion Road
. .
--:4 ~
- -
. , '. -.~ ,
.: '
PROPOSED
, I STOREY I
ADDITION 'r1'6m
...:
EXISTING EXISTING
2 STOREY , 1 STOREY 1.6 m c
BUILDING BUILDING <
cø. 0
~
r z
" 0
EXISTiNG . 1=
0
1 STOREY Z
BUILDING TO
1- BE DEMOLISHED, .... ,...t. -
""7" ....
60.9 m
E ,to
ee
N
N
PROPOSED
1 STOREY
ADDITION
r/ //./ / ./ / / /',/ ',./ / ./ ' ./ ./,/,/,/ ,/,/ ./
To permit a minimum of
21 parking spaces
~
THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES
DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN, OCT. 3, 2005,
...J
! (fJ
i(ID - .~'
I
! 12% SLOPE'DOWN
~
I) 2. t')
(',. c
¡-- ._,-- ',(l
~.
I
to>
, I
E ¡ -- --
co
N
N
z
, " ~
0
0
w
a.
APPLICANTS REVISED PLAN
21 PARKING SPACES
INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED t"LAN
PICA 55/05 -
PICKFRINc; AI JTO Ronv I Tn.
-'-
: PROPOSED
. PARKADE -
-r~ BELOW 1 STOREY ADDITION
¡
, i
t
.._~ .- ,,_..- ,', ~-_._..,--~~ ,1 ,--,_.._'.,...... .,....." '
<III
12% SLOPE DOWN,
, I
" .
" '."~' ..
"'" !
;~
'¡
II 'I PROPOSED
. 1 STOREY
.~ ! ADDITION
~; 'fNlTH PARKADE BEL
, ¡;'1
W
EXISTING
2 STOREY
BUILDING'
PROPOSED
1 STOREY
ADDITION
f ! '\
;':; , Q
, I Qj I ;
:;!.'..~.."":'1:.¡.. i).,;"". ,.1
J!Õ " L , '1(0);- .:
-'."T'~'!."":,\i?D ¡
~, t i" r !
j l, ;'
~'
, .
10% SLOPE UP
~
__n. - ~'-
r" ,_. '~:<';' ~ ,. "~'I~b:.:~j"~""4: p.
-.- '--,:;:;. '. -
To permit a minimum of
21 parking spaces
c
«
0
cr::
z
0
¡::
0
z
\
~
THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES
DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN, OCT. 3, 2005,
/u" ,.~,:~~QE~_,"~,",~
9'9,':)
¡..._OJ'
APPLICANT'S REVISED ELEVATION PLANS
INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED ELEVATION PLAN
PICA 55/05 -
PICKERING AUTO BODY LTD.
r- --------
¡
I
!
CD
."rr""'",,'.r,]!'I'r~"I:II'I'11W']l, TITT',1 '
. <i"III!' I , ", Ii/" ~ --
""'I .. , -
":;¡:;,'.!'I.!iI,i¡,q. ,',1' -j
Ll~ LL LJ,J'" ¡
- I
, ,
SOUTH ELEVATION
"
í'=C; r-- - ---ITIf[~"I"¡:::'
: IIIIII~,I/.Jiljill""
, I
! ¡ I
D
-- -- - -j(
I ,;
¡ Ii
- ."""'-- ...-.-.-, ..-...,--...........
NORTH ELEVATION
-- --,"-'--""-,w_"--,,,--,-,--
EÃST ELEVATION
.-. ",' -',"
I:r~""';¡ ..
---______1-'
WEST ELEVATION
,
THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES
DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN, OCT. 3, 2005,
t¡). , ,¿lit..
¡ ~ : 'to
';-1þ(:; ",'~1!1 #
THE CORPORA nON OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LA W NO.
5940/02
Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 3036, as amended, to
impl~ment the Official Plan of the City of Pickering District Planning Area,
Region of Durham in Part of Lot 17, Concession I, City of Pickering.
(OPA 01-O041P; A 19/01)
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering, having completed the
Notion Road Land list ~.; ¡_'rban Design Study, deems it desirable to permit a range of mixed
employment uses on th:: sabJ eet lands, being Part of Lot 17, Concession I, City of Pickering;
AND 'WHEREAS an amendment to By-law 3036, as amended, is therefore deemed necessary;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCfL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF
PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1.
SCHEDULE I
Schedule I attached hereto with notations and references shown thereon is hereby
declared to be part of this By-law.
2.
AREA RESTRICTED
The provisions of this By-law shall apply to those lands in Part of Lot 17, Concession 1,
City of Pickering, designated "MC - 15" on Schedule I attached hereto.
3.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
No building, land or part thereof shall hereafter be used, occupied, erected, moved, or
structurally altered except in confOlwity with the provisions of this By-law.
4.
DEFINITIONS
In this By-law,
(1)
"Adult Entertainment Par1our" shall mean any premises or part thereof in which is
provided, in pursuance of a trade, calling, business or occupation, services
appealing to or designed to appeal to erotic or sexual appetites or inclinations;
(2)
"Bakery" shall mean a building or part of a building in which food products are
baked, prepared and offered for retail sale, or in which food products baked and
prepared elsewhere are offered for retail sale;
(3)
"Business Office" sha1l mean any building or pali of a building in which one or
more per~ons are employed in the management, direction or conducting of an
agency, business, brokerage, labour or fraternal organization and shall include a
telegraph office, newspaper plant and a radio or television broadcasting station
and its studios or theatres, but shaH not include a retail store;
(4)
"Club" shaH mean a building or part of a building in which a not-far-profit or
non-commercial organization carries out social, cultural, welfare, athletic or
recreational programs for the benefit of the community;
4- ;, TO
J"~:J;J~."".. ._-
¡
(5)
(6)
- 2 -
" .., :' It. If TO
HEPORì iI PO -¡¡;:ez:;-
225
"Commercial Club" shall mean an athletic or recreational club operated for gain
or profit and having public or private membership, but shall not include an adult
entertainment parlour as defined herein;
"Commercial-Recreational Establishment" shall mean a commercial
establishment in which indoor recreational facilities are provided, and which may
include an athletic or recreational club, but shall not include any uses pemlissible
within a place of amusement or entertainment as defined herein;
(7)
"Commercial Schoo]" shall mean a school which is operated for gain or profit and
may include the studio of a dancing teacher or music teacher, an art school, a golf
school or any other school operated for gain or profit;
(8)
"Convenience Store" shall mean a retail store in which food, dmgs, periodicals or
similar items of day-to-day household necessities are kept for retail sale primarily
to residents of, or persons employed in, the immediate neighbourhood;
(9)
"Dry Cleaning Establishment" shall mean a building or part of a building where
articles, goods or fabric are subjected to dry cleaning and related processes, are
received or distributed, or where a dI)' cleaning plant is operated, or both, and
which may include the laundering, pressing or incidental tailoring or repair of
articles, goods or fabric;
(10)
"Financial Institution" shall mean a building or part of a building in which money
is deposited, kept, lent or exchanged;
(11)
"Food Preparation Plant" shaH mean a building or part of a building in which
processed food products are cooked, baked, mixed, packaged or otherwise
prepared for distJibution to retail or institutional outlets;
(12)
"Gross Leasable Floor Area" shall mean the aggregate of all storeys above or
below established grade, designed for owner or tenant occupancy or exc]usive use
only, but excluding storage areas below established grade;
(13)
"Light Machiner\' and Equipment Supplier" shall mean a building or a pal1 of a
building in which office furniture and machines, carpet and drapery cleaning
equipment, painting, gardening and plumbing equipment, small hand power too]s
and similar products are stored, offered or kept for wholesale or retail sale to
industrial or commercial establishments;
(14)
"Light Manufacturing Plant" shall mean a manufacturing plant used for: the
production of apparel and finished textile products other than the production of
synthetic fibers; printing or duplicating; the manufacture of finished paper other'
than the processing of wood pulp; the production of cosmetics, dmgs and other
phannaceutical supplies; or, the manufacture of finished lumber products, light
metal products, electronic products, plasticware, porcelain, earthenware,
glassware or similar articles, including but not necessarily restricted to, fumiture,
housewares, toys, musical instmments, jewellery, watches, precision instruments,
radios and electronic components;
(15)
"Lot" shall mean an area of land fronting on a street which is used or
intended to be used as the site of a building, or group of buildings, as the
case may be, together with any accessory buildings or structures, or a
public park or open space area, regardless of whether or not such Jot
constitutes the whole of a lot or block on a registered plan of subdivision;
(a)
(b)
"Lot Frontage" shall mean the width of a Jot between the side lot lines
measured along a line parallel to and 7.5 metres distant from the front lot
line;
226
'I
I
(17)
- 3 -
i" T1 iC'{;[rr!!¥"__.~:rO
U ,!". P U~,,_,",y£:gL".__.,----"~
(16)
"Manufacturing Plant" shall mean a building or part of a building in which is
carried on any cc:tivity or operation pertaining to the making of any al1icle, and
which shall include altering, assembling, repairing, ornamenting, finishing,
cleaning, polishing, washing. packing, adapting for sale, breaking up or
demolishing the said article;
"Merchandise Service Shop" shall mean an establishment where articles or goods
including, but not necessarily limited to, business machines, appliances, fulllitme
or similar items are repaired or serviced, and includes the regular place of
business of a master electrician or master plumber, but shall not include a
manufacturing plant or any establishment used for the service or repair of vehicles
or a retail store;
(18)
"Office-Associated Commercial Establishment" shall mean an establishment
providing retail goods or equipment required for the daily operation of a business
office or professional office, such as a stationery store, a computer store, or an
office furniture store;
(19)
"Personal Service Shop" shaH mean an establishment in which a personal service
is perfonned and which may include a barber shop, a beauty salon, a shoe repair
shop, a tailor or dressmaking shop or a photographic studio, but shall not include a
body-rub parlour as defined in section 224(9)(b) of the Municipal Act, R"S.O.
1990, as amended fìom time-to-time, or any successor thereto;
(20)
"Place of Amusement or Entertainment" shaH mean a building or part of a
building in which facilities are provided for amusement or entertainment
purposes, and which may include a biHiard or pool room, a dance hall, a music
hall or a theatre, but shaH not include a room or an area used for any video lottery
tenninal use as governed by the Gaming Services Act, an adult entertainment
parlour as defined herein or a body rub parlour as defined in the Ivlunicipal Act,
R.S.O. 1990, Chapter MAS, as amended from time to time, or any successor
thereto;
(21)
"Place of Assembly" shall mean a building or pa11 of a building in which facilities
are provided for civic, educational, political, recreational, religious or social
meeting purposes and may include facilities for entertainment purposes such as
musical and theatrical perfonnances, but shall not include a place of amusement
or entertainment as defined herein;
(22)
"Place of Religious Assembly" shall mean 1ands or premises where people
assemble for worship, counseling, educational, contemplative or other purposes of
a religious nature, which may include social, recreational, and charitable
activities, and offices for the administration thereof;
(23)
"Printing Establislm1ent" shall mean an establislm1ent used for blueprinting,
engraving, electro-typing, photocopying, plotting fìom disk, printing, stereot)'1iing .
or typesetting;
(24)
"Professional Office" shall mean a building or part of a building in which
medical, legal or other professional service is perforn1ed or consultation given,
and which may include a clinic, the offices of an architect, a chartered accountant,
an engineer, a lawyer or a physician, but shall not include a body-ntb parlour as
defined by the Municipal Act, RS.O. 1990, c.M. 45, as amended from
time-to-time, or any successor thereto;
(25)
"Restaurant - Type A" shall mean a building or part of a building where food is
prepared and offered or kept for retail sale to the public for immediate
consumption on the premises or off the premises, or both on and off the premises;
II
-4-
. ~~ 11.- If TO
,:c!yH ;1 PD~_.. I~J - ttz.
227
(26)
"Rental Establishment" shall mean a building or part of a building in which
goods, wares, merchandise, substances, articles or things are offered or kept for
offer for rent directly to the public, but does not include the rental of I11mor
vehicles, and does not include a video store; .
(27)
"Sales Outlet" shall mean a building or part of a bui1ding accessory to a bakery, a
food preparation plant, a light manufacturing plant, a manufacturing plant, a
merchandise service shop, a Plinting establishment, or a warehouse, wherein
products manufactured, produced, processed, stored, serviced or repaired on ¡he
premises are kept or displayed for rent or for wholesale or retail sale, or wherein
orders are taken for future de]ivery of such products;
(28)
"Scientific, Medical or Research Laboratory" shaH mean a building or part of a
building wherein scientific, research or medical experiments or investigations are
systematically conducted, or where drugs, chemicals, glassware or other
substances or articles pertinent to such experiments or investigations may be
manufactured or otherwise prepared for use on the premises;
(29)
"Vehicle Repair Shop" shall mean an establishment containing facilities for the
repair and maintenance of vehicles on the premises, in which vehicle accessories
are sold and vehicle maintenance and repair operations are perfom1ed, but shall
not include a body shop or any establishment engaged in the retail sale of motor
vehicle fuels;
(30)
"Vehicle Sales or Rental Establishment" shall mean an establishment used for the
sale, service, rent or lease of vehicles and which may include as an accessory use
thereto a vehicle repair shop, but shaH not include any establislU11ent engaged in
the retail sale of motor vehicle fuels;
(31)
"Video Store" shall mean a building or part of a building in which video cassette
recorders, tapes, and accessories thereto are stored, serviced, displayed, and
offered for rent or retail sale to the public for use off the premises only;
(32)
"Warehouse" shall mean a building or part of a building which is used primarily
for the housing, storage, adapting for sale, packaging, or wholesale distribution of
goods, wares, merchandise, food-stuffs, substances, articles or things, and
includes the premises of a warehouseman but shalll1ot include a fuel storage tank
except as an accessory use;
(33)
"Waste Transfer and Management Facility" shall mean a building or pal1 of a
building which is used primarily [or the storage, handling or processing of
household, institutional, commercial or industrial waste;
(34)
"Yard" shall mean an area of land which is appurtenant to and located on
the same lot as a building or structure and is open, uncovered, and
unoccupied above ground except for such accessory buildings, stmctures,
or other uses as are specifically pennitted thereon;
(a)
(b)
"Front Yard" shall mean a yard extending across the f111l width of a lot
between the front lot line of the lot and the nearest wall of the nearest
main building or structure on the lot;
(c)
"Front Yard Depth" shall mean the shortest horizontal dimension of a front
yard of a lot between the front lot line and the nearest wall of the nearest
main building or structure on the lot;
(d)
"Rear Yard" shall mean a yard extending across the fu]] width of a lot
benveen the rear Jot line of the lot, or where there is no rear lot line, the
junction point of the side lot lines, and the nearest wall of the nearest main
building or stl1lcture on the Jot;
_28
5.
PROVISIONS
(1)
- 5 -
f" .Lf .".
, k~ 010
(e)
"Rear Yard Depth" shall mean the shortest horizontal dimension of a rear
yard of a lot between the rear lot line of the lot, or where there is no rear
lot line, the junction point of the side lot lines, and the nearest \\'al1 or the
nearest main building or stnlcture on the lot;
(f)
"Side Yard" shal1 mean a yard of a lot extending from the fi'ont yard to ¡he
rear yard, and from the side lot line to the nearest wall of the nearest main
building or structure on the lot;
(g)
"Side Yard Width" shall mean the shortest horizontal dimension of a side
yard of a lot between the side lot line and the nearest wall of the nearest
main building or stl11cture on the lot;
(h)
"flankalle Side Yard" shall mean a side yard immediately adjoining a
street or abutting on a reserve on the opposite side of which is a street;
(i)
"flankalle Side Yard Width" shall mean the shortest horizontal dimension
of a flankage side yard of a lot between the lot line adjoining a street or
abutting on a reserve on the opposite side of which is a street, and the
nearest wall of the nearest main building or stmcture on the lot; and
U)
"Interior Side Yard" shall mean a side yard other than a flankage side
yard.
Uses Permitted ("MC - 15" Zone)
No person shall within the lands designated "MC-lS" on Schednle I attached hereto, use
any lot or erect, alter, or use any building or structure for any purpose except the
following:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
U)
(k)
(I)
(m)
(n)
(0)
(P)
(q)
(r)
(s)
(t)
(u)
(v)
(w)
(x)
(y)
bakery;
business office;
club;
commercial club;
commercial-recreational establishment;
commercial school;
convenience store;
dry cleaning establishment;
financial institution;
food preparation plant;
light machinery and equipment supplier;
light manufactming pJant;
merchandise service shop;
office-associated commercial establishment;
personal service shop;
place of amusement or entertainment;
place of assembly;
place of religious assembly;
printing establishment;
professional office;
restaurant - Type A;
rental establishment;
sales outlet;
scientific, medical or research laboratory;
warehouse.
(2)
- 6 -
i~ 4 T'I
.) ,.__._..=..~ u
, !::':i"_w."..,J.k?.:é:!e.--...,,,.
f)r')9
{.. f- . i
Zone Requirements ("MC - 15" Zone)
No person shall within the lands designated "MC - 15" on Schedule T attached
hereto, use any lot or erect, alter or use any building except in accordance with the
following provisions:
(a)
OUTDOOR STORAGE:
All pelmanent uses, other than parking, shall take place entirely within
enclosed buildings or structures with no outside storage or display;
(b)
FRONT YARD DEPTH (minimum):
6.0 metres
(c)
INTERIOR SIDE YARD WIDTH (minimum):
4.5 metres
(d)
FLANKAGE SIDE YARD WIDTH (minimum):
3.0 metres
(e)
REAR YARD DEPTH (mirumum):
12.0
metres
(f)
(g)
BUILDING HEIGHT (maximum):
12.0 metres
PARKING:
(i)
There shall be provided and maintained on the lands designated
"MC-IS", parking at a ratio of:
S.S spaces per 100 square metres gross leasable area for the
first 500 square metres; phiS,
3.S spaces per 100 square metres gross leasable area for all
11001' space in excess of 500 square metres;
(ii)
Clauses 5.11.1 (a), (b), (c), (e) and (f), inclusive, of By-law 3036,
as amended, shall not apply to the lands designated "MC - IS" on
Schedule I attached hereto;
(iii)
Despite clauses S.21.2g) and S.11.2k) of By-law 3036, as
amended, all entrances and exits to parking areas and all parking
areas shall be surfaced with blick, asphalt, or concrete, or any
combination thereof.
(h)
LOADING:
(i)
shall only be located in the side yard;
(ii)
Despite (i) above, loading may be located in the rear yard provided.
it is screened ITom public view and from abutting residential land
uses through architectural screening, landscape buffering, berming
or a combination of these treatments.
I1l\ 'Q, 0
( .....1 .
(i)
U)
- 7 -
, " '. 'T 'l ~
',i,':C},'!. it '.
--~~"
PC' Ih-oiO
REAR YARD LANDSCAPED OPEN AREA:
A minimum 3 metre landscaped open area shall be provided along
the rear lot line to screen parking, loading and buildings through
architectural screening, landscape buffering, benDing or a
combination of these treatments, from the view of abutting
residential uses.
SPECIAL REGULATIONS:
(i)
Despite any other provision in this By-law, lawful uses existing on
the lands designated "MC-15" on Schedule I attached to this By-
law on the date of passing of this By-law, shall be deemed to
comply with the provisions of By-law 3036, as amended. Any
alterations, additions, or new development on the lands shall
comply with all the provisions set out in this By-law;
Despite any other provision in this By-law, a waste transfer and
management facility shall not be permitted on lands designated
"MC-] 5" on Schedule 1 attached hereto;
A sales outlet, accessory to a permitted bakery, food preparation
plant, light manufactUring plant, manufacturing plant, merchandise
service shop, printing establishment or warehouse, shall only be
pennitted provided the gross leasable area of the sales outlet does
not exceed 25% of the gross leasable floor area of ¡he related
industrial operation;
Despite Clause (iii) above, a sales outlet may exceed 25% up to a
maximum of 40% of the gross leasable floor area of the related
industrial operation, provided the aggregate gross leasable floor
area of all sales outlets in a building does not exceed 25% of the
total gross leasable floor area in that building;
The maximum gross leasable floor area for any convenience store,
office-associated commercial establishment, tìnancia! ;nstitutibn,
personal service shop, and restaurant - Type A shall be 325 square
metres;
The maximum aggregate gross leasable floor area shall be:
A for all convenience stores on the lot: 325 square metres
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
B for all office-asso'ciated commercial
establishments on the lot: 3:25 square metres
C for all financial institutions on the Jot: 325 square metres
D for al1 personal service shops on the lot: 325 square metres
E for al1 restaurants - Type A on the lot: 325 square metres
-8 -
""T.I..,.r'\.J""'.':~'T# 4. "Y'Q
""""""L"",_,wl.-.
; ~)f'~,.jk::Þ.!e~""-,,
fì'~.J,..
oJ J t
6.
BY-LAW 3036
(1)
By-law 4257/72 is hereby repealed;
(2)
By-laws 2118/85 and 2245/86, only as they affect the subject lands designated
"MC-15" on Schedule I attached hereto, are hereby repealed; and,
(3)
By-law 3036, as amended, is hereby further amended only to the extent necessary
to give effect to the provisions of this By-law as it appJies to the area set out in
Schedule I attached hereto, Definitions and subject matters not specifically dealt
with in this By-law shall be governed by relevant provisions of By-law 3036, as
amended,
7.
EFFECTIVE DATE
This By-law shall take effect from the day of passing hereof, subject to the approval and
com:.ng into effect of the related Amendment 7 to the Pickering Official Plan (resulting
from Pickering Official P]an Amendment Application OPA 01-004/P), or subject to the
appr;)val of the Ontario Municipal Board, if required.
BY-LAW n:ad a first, second, and third time and finally passed this 21 day of January, 2002.
--?
~~//
Wayne Arthurs, Mayor
.¡}:/
;?/}
,; I
~nlce Taylor, Clerk
~
"-"
I
tr}' ! f)
¡. .
i
II
I:
1\
II
.1
!I
¡i
\1
1\
II
II
"
Ii
,I
Ii
Ii
Ii
:1
Ii
Ii
il
Ii
Ii
I'
!\
Ii
Ii
;j
i
I
II
I
I
I
I
TO
12 .:.çzb '
~~."
\ i ,/'
~I/
...-'\,
.....------
---/
----------
------'
~/
\
\
\
\
\
l'
N
SCHEDULE I TO BY-LAW 59ílO/O2
PASSED THIS 21
DAY OF January 2002
~~
MAYOR
,/..':?
(>'!
,
I
{
"---
, .
CLERK'
5
. 'C .lÍtJ:-:l;/o
o3/:"è
(... .j
CiÚI o~
REPORT TO
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
Application Number PICA 55/05
Meeting Date: October 19, 2005
From:
Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner - Development Review
Subject:
Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 55/05
Pickering Auto Body
1968 Notion Road
(North Part of Lot 17, Concession 1)
City of Pickering
Application:
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 5940/02 to
permit a minimum of 11 parking spaces and a minimum parking setback of 1.6 metres
from Notion Road, whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 28 parking spaces and a
minimum parking setback of 3.0 metres from Notion Road.
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain site plan approval
and a building permit to construct two one-storey additions onto an existing auto body
shop.
Recommendation:
The Planning & Development Department considers the proposed reduction in parking
to a minimum of 11 parking spaces and a reduced parking setback of 1.6 metres to be
major variances that are not desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and
not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning
By-law, and therefore recommends REFUSAL of the proposed variances.
234
Report PICA 55/05
f-
.;;L-_-
jJ!; . ..~---!~~:.,9~-.--_w_-
October 13, 2005
Page 2
Comment:
Official Plan and Zoninq By-law
Pickering Official Plan - "Employment Area - Mixed Employment" within the Village East
Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 5940102 - "MC-15" -Industrial -
Commercial Zone
Appropriateness of the Application
Minimum Parking Space Variance
- the intent of the zoning by-law is to require a minimum number of parking spaces
to ensure that there is adequate parking provided on-site to serve the operation;
- the applicant is proposing to construct two one-storey additions, approximately
315 square metres in size, onto the existing 220 square metre building, for the
purpose of operating an auto body shop;
- the applicant is requesting to reduce the required 28 parking spaces to 11
parking spaces, this is a 60 percent reduction;
based on a recent site visit to the property, it appears as though there is currently
not enough parking provided on-site to support the operation within the existing
building;
- the proposed two one-storey additions on the site will only aggravate the parking
situation, as the introduction of new floor area creates the need for more parking
while eliminating space presently used for parking;
- the reduction of parking will negatively impact the function of the property;
- this reduction will not adequately provide enough parking on-site to serve the
operation;
- the proposed reduced parking is not considered to be minor in nature and is not
desirable development;
- the intent of the zoning by-law would not be maintained.
Parking Setback Variance
- the intent of the parking area setback is to maintain an appropriate buffer
between vehicle parking areas and public road allowances;
- the vehicle parking setback is only necessary if the request for the parking
reduction was supported;
- the request for the reduced parking is not supported therefore the parking
setback from the road allowance cannot be supported;
Report PICA 55/05
235
-'
f !:7
..['-'U¡; i ;>1 PL,-==JlP-::~oi;L~,=", .
October 13, 2005
Page 3
Input From Other Sources
Pickering Fire Services
Development Control Supervisor
TRCA
Date of report: October 13, 2005
Comments prepared by:
RP:GXR:jf
co fal re po rts/2 00 51 peaS 5-0 5 . d oe
Enclosure
no concerns
no concerns
a permit is required from the TRCA
prior to the construction of any
buildings or structures and prior to the
placement or dumping of fill on the
property
Ross p&pp~
Principal Planner - Development Review
o3C
{~ . \)
7.
PUm\NH ADOPTiON
PICA 55/05 - Pickering Auto Body
1968 Notion Road
(North Part of Lot 17, Concession 1)
City of Pickering
;~rTÞ,Ci;~;:::¡\I'1i,~.~-=-1'O EXTRACT FROM COMMITTEE 0:
. ;1 P[:,"",,="J'a.:""CW ~~,,- ADWSn'iiENT MiNUTES OF
~. "".",
0 CT 1 H L\J~13
. .
The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, "as amended by
By-law 5940102 to permit a minimum of 11 parking spaces and a minimum
parking setback of 1.6 metres from Notion Road, whereas the by-law requires a
minimum of 28 parking spaces and a minimum parking setback of 3.0 metres
from Notion Road.
The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain site plan
approval and a building permit to construct two one-storey additions onto an
existing auto body shop.
..,,--'.-
The Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering
Planning & Development Department. Written comments were received from the
City's Development Control Supervisor and the City's Fire Prevention Officer,
both expressing no concerns. Written comments were also received from
Toronto and Region Conservation stating that TRCA staff do not object to the
minor variance application, subject to the applicant successfully obtaining an
Ontario Regulation 158 permit prior to the issuance, of municipal building permit.
Zaheer Beg, agent, was present to represent the application. Mary Louise &
Peter Huebner of 1964 Notion Road were present in objection to the application.
Zaheer Beg advised the application is being revised as the site design has
changed and the requested variance will also change.
MOTION: Moved by Bill Utton, seconded by Chris Braney
That application PICA 55/05 by, Pickering Auto Body be TABLED until the next
scheduled meeting of November 9, 2005 to give the applicant the opportunity to
amend the application.
CARRIED
Vote
Marie Billinger
Chris Braney
David Johnson
Eric Newton
Bill Utton
in favour
in favour
opposed
in favour
in favour
85
?37
'7 ...-
- '.l~--J.Jilì
REPORT TO
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
Application Number PICA 55/05
Meeting Date: November 9, 2005
(Tabled from October 19, 2005 meeting)
From:
Ross Pym, MCIP, RPP
Principal Planner - Development Review
Subject:
Committee of Adjustment Application PICA 55/05 - REVISED
Pickering Auto Body
1968 Notion Road
(North Part of Lot 17, Concession 1)
City of Pickering
Application:
The applicant has amended the application and requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036,
as amended by By-law 5940102 to permit a minimum of 21 parking spaces, whereas the
by-law requires a minimum of 29 parking spaces.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain site plan approval and a
building permit to construct two one-storey additions onto an existing auto body shop.
Recommendation:
The Planning & Development Department considers the proposed reduction in parking
to a minimum of 21 parking spaces to be a major variance that is not desirable or
appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and
purpose of the Zoning By-law, and therefore recommends REFUSAL of the proposed
variance.
fl)~()
,~,J"
Report PICA 55/05 - REVISED
~t.=.l,~~~
~/~;.<-LLe,:Ç(¡)---- -
November 3, 2005
Page 2
Comment:
Official Plan and Zoninq By-law
Pickering Official Plan - "Employment Area - Mixed Employment" within the Village East
Neighbourhood
Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 5940102 - "MC-15" -Industrial -
Commercial Zone
Appropriateness of the Application
Minimum Parking Space Variance
- the intent of the zoning by-law is to require a minimum number of parking spaces
to ensure that there is adequate parking provided on-site to serve the operation;
- the applicant is proposing to construct two one-storey additions, approximately
388 square metres in size, onto an existing 116 square metre portion of the
building, for the purpose of operating an auto body shop;
- the applicant is requesting to reduce the required parking from 29 to 21 parking
spaces, with 10 of the parking spaces being provided in a parkade structure
located below the proposed rear addition;
in order to accommodate parking in the parkade structure a significant amount of
fill would have to be removed from the site in order to achieve grades to access
the parkade area;
- a number of reports would also have to be submitted and reviewed in order to
determine the impacts of this design on the subject lands and abutting lands;
- the proposed two one-storey additions with the parkade structure below the rear
addition does not promote proper site development;
by providing parking in a parkade structure below the rear one-storey addition
demonstrates that the site is being overdeveloped;
- although the proposed design is creative, it still cannot achieve the minimum
required number of 29 parking space;
- the nature of auto body shop operations is that the minimum, if not more parking
spaces are required on-site as extra parking spaces are required for vehicles
being worked on, waiting to be worked on, or waiting to be picked-up thus a
reduction from the minimum required parking spaces is not considered
appropriate;
- the inability to achieve the minimum amount of required parking, even with
significant site alterations, demonstrates that the proposal is not minor and is not
appropriate or desirable development;
- the intent of the zoning by-law would not be maintained.
Report PICA 55/05 - REVISED
,'7 ,i'
it P[):::.:::J1::Q~~.o
2'3'"
November 3,2005
Page 3
Input From Other Sources
Pickering Fire Services
Development Control Supervisor
TRCA
Date of report: November 3, 2005
Comments prepared by:
RP:GXR:ld
cofa/reports/200S/pcaSS-O5- TABLED ,doc
Enclosure
no concerns
Concerned with the impact of grading,
drainage, bearing capacities
(geotechnical), stormwater management,
site engineering and construction
management on the subject site and
abutting the property;
a permit is required from the TRCA
prior to the construction of any
buildings or structures and prior to the
placement or dumping of fill on the
property;
Ross pC~pp t?
Principal Planner - Development Review
-.J
! (f)
i(ID - ~'
I
! 12% SLOPEi'DOWN
.
240
¡-- ,.'-- '?J'
§
i
b
E' !---
c.c
~!
z
, " ~
0
0
w
a..
."Ù!iViEilJT !Jc_~'T..,.~"='"LY
'1EHAr; 11 rD"~=~L~~Ç'1e.~~
APPLICANTS REVISED PLAN
21 PARKING SPACES
INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED t"LAN
PICA 55/05 -
PIC'.KFRINC"', AIITO Ronv I Tn.
-
: PROPOSED
PARKADE
-1-~ BELOW 1 STOREY ADDITION
I
I ¡
..
',.- ,. ..-". .', ~-_..,"- ,---:I. ,1, '--'-"""""" ...'..", '
III
12% SLOPE DOWN,
, I
" '
. f
" ",,;. "
."" i
-:;
ï
II '\ PROPOSED
, 1 STOREY
~ ¡ ADDITION
~; .. rv"ITH PARKADE BEL
, ':;1
¡ ,
w
EXISTING
2 STOREY
BUILDING'
PROPOSED
1 STOREY
ADDITION
, .
" "
10% SLOPE UP
.
--...- - ~.--+
1'" -. '~:;:;,-:. ¡" .~ "1:'::...'-~""4: '"
60.9 m
--- "1':::':" ". .
, ----. - -
To permit a minimum of
21 parking spaces
"\
"
C
<C
0
0:::
Z
0
¡::
0
z
"
$
THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES
DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN, OCT. 3, 2005.
n;F"""viCi"""it ]'J"::'I
",...I"I'-¡~¡U,=~,=c~== ",
',C:,(,'i~,i¡.""n 1/..,_,-.,1"
",,:;>.)t J i7 '¡';w~~~~'f"c ,
I!)A',-«'
I/- '"t;' J
APPLICANT'S REVISED ELEVATION PLANS
INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED ELEVATION PLAN
PICA 55/05 -
PICKERING AUTO BODY LTD.
L~, -",
H---- ,
~- --------
,
I
!
1.11.¡rrr"":."..'l:1rl"'f~'I:I:I'I-Ilrr,:mm, 1:.1 '
-""-"-'-L~¡iliIIIL,:",'ì-_-
-"'ii::,~.!il,.!lI.ii,ILI' ..4P --I
OJ : j' ::. ¡ I ," - :
. . l~", '-.-' L.1.. i
.. I
rn
, ,
.. ...-.....-.---.-.
SOUTH ELEVATION
'=c; r-- --~ITr1nrm"I"¡~:i
: 111I11~l.lIlJ¡liill"
! : I
0
-- - -- -j.-,
I I'
¡ Ii
.
_. """'--.--'-----"-'-"----""".
NORTH ELEVATION
...,.
EAST ELEVATION.
-1-:--'" --'-'---'---""'--"'-"---"'----'-'
~L .-: "', . ."".' I
{F~:"-;¡ .._- .
.. .-.. - - . .LI
WEST ELEVATION
,
THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES
DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN, OCT. 3, 2005.
2,42
4.
.1TTA""I-"\!f,:~,:~,'l 1,.-\', " "C"n,.,'
'.~" \",dv:"...dj)Oc;..,=='-?-~~~J(",
:~'i;:,;'C;,'n "JI ~)ô',.i".".",...L,I,.",'",'",C, J "',',
,-' ...r", " . ~..~.".,~ ,~-.-".,".y.(.,,-.
(Tabled at the October 19, 2005 meeting)
PICA 55/05 - REVISED Pickering Auto Body
1968 Notion Road
(North Part of Lot 17, Concession 1)
City of Pickering
NOV 9 2005
PENDING ADOPHON
EXTRACT FROM COMMITTEE Of
ADJUSTMENT MINUTES OF
MOTION: Moved by Bill Utton, seconded by Marie Billinger
That PICA 55/05, by Pickering Auto Body be lifted from the table.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
The applicant has amended the application and requests relief from Zoning By-law
3036, as amended by By-law 5940102 to permit a minimum of 21 parking spaces,
whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 29 parking spaces. -
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain site plan approval
and a building permit to construct two one-storey additions onto an existing auto
body shop.
The Secretary-Treasurer outlined comments received from the City of Pickering
Planning & Development Department. Written comments were received from the
City's Fire Prevention Officer, expressing no concerns. Written comments were
received from the City's Development Control Supervisor concerned with the
impact of grading, drainage, bearing capacities (geotechnical), stormwater
management, site engineering and construction on the subject site and abutting
property. Written comments were also received from Toronto and Region
Conservation stating that TRCA require the following information prior to the
approval of the minor variance, details of how the site will be flood proofed to the
level of the Regulatory Flood and studies and drawings of the subject proposal
that satisfy the Special Policy Area requirements.
Zaheer Beg, applicant, was present to represent the application. Mary Louise &
Peter Huebner of 1964 Notion Road were present in objection to the application.
Zaheer Beg explained to the Committee that he would like to Table the application
again and explained a revised plan has been prepared that scaled down the
addition to the building, that parking will be on one level and only a small variance
for parking will be required.
Committee member David Johnson noted his concern with notification to area
residents with tabled applications that propose different development and
advised the applicant to submit a new application.
MOTION: Moved by David Johnson, seconded by Marie Billinger
That application PICA 55/05 by Pickering Auto Body, be REFUSED on the grounds
that the proposed reduction in parking to a minimum of 21 parking spaces is a
major variance that is not desirable or appropriate development of the land, and
not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
88
<-1 .
Jk;C9.~
94'--:.'
¡:" ,J
DECISION OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
IN THE MATTER OF Section 45 of The Planning Act, RS.O. 1990, chapter P.13,
PICA 55/05 - Pickering Auto Body
1968 Notion Road
(North Part of Lot 17, Concession 1)
City of Pickering
The applicant has amended the application and requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036,
as amended by By-law 5940102 to permit a minimum of 21 parking spaces, whereas the
by-law requires a minimum of 29 parking spaces.
The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain site plan approval and a
building permit to construct two one-storey additions onto an existing auto body shop.
This application was heard by the City of Pickering Committee of Adjustment on
November 9, 2005 due notice of such Hearing having been sent as required by the
Committee of Adjustment.
IT WAS THE DECISION OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT:
That application PICA 55/05 by Pickering Auto Body, be REFUSED on the grounds that
the proposed reduction in parking to a minimum of 21 parking spaces is a major
variance that is not desirable or appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping
with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law.
244
PICA 55/05
:~~~~~1 !~ì £1; D .:::~::-1CZ~qiP
Page 2
SIGNED this 9th day of November
2005, by all members present and
concurring in this Decision
LAST DAY FOR APPEAL
OF THIS DECISION IS
NOVEMBER 29, 2005
f
'-hì.~~~
M. Billinger ----
I
D.Johnson
E. Newton
B. Utton
w .r-r /!;¡zL/
'C"""\""""'I".,I""j 10 'T~'
A; ¡ .. lA-III¡ c'~ j it ,---"'-" ->" ,.".
HEPt)Rl ¡¡ -PD~,~,=lb~g(¡¿,.
~4:"'
{~ "tJ
NOTICE OF APPEAL
",~,' 1;;',' ,~, " ,= :1,'\,,/' ',,',ft'" ~;¡,'\"
h i"" ~7 t: ~,., i '!;: ijJ
November 28, 2005
~,: ' ('" ') , '1" 'ì r>
:~UV '"' !..UUJ
CjTY OF PJCKERJNG¡
?LA,NNING & DEVELOPNIE)\Ï'r
DEP;),RTMENT
Ontario Municipal Board
655 Bay Street, Suite 1500
Toronto, On M5G 1£5
Ref. : Committee Of Adjustment decision
PICA 55/05 - Pickering Auto Body Ltd.
1968 Notion Road, Pickering
The decision by the City of Pickering Committee of Adjustment, not to table for the next
Committee meeting to consider "a further scaled down proposal" for the aforementioned
address and the decision to refuse the application is unfair, biased, deliberate, inconsistent
and discriminatory.
Therefore in view of the above, I appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board, on the
Committee of Adjustment's decision of November 9, 2005.
A copy of the sketch handed to one of the committee members (Mr. David Johnson)
along with the revised proposal and a cheque for $125 are enclosed.
! 11,¡{
I (/L.L. 24--/17 Pl-----
Zaheer Beg .-:,-:¡,
100 Bobmar Road, Scarborough, Ontario M1C 1C9
Tel 416 281-8740 I Fax 416281-0047 I E-mail: zbeg@rogers.com
0
«
a
a::::
z
a
r-
a
z
9.Bm (32'-1~-)
L 3. m
2.5m
1
3
"I
./
SITE PLAN
SCALE 1:200
~
L EXIST. NEIGHBOUR'S l
PROPERTY
///////////////////////////LL//
12.0Bm (39'-7'f)
50.96m (200'-O-)
9.45m (31'-O")
E.~1T. WOOD FENCE --,
EXIST. DRIVEWAY
2.5m
'"
~~:.¡ EXIST. 1 STOREYl
~ ¡ BLDG. TO BE
.--" DEMOLISHED
Ú .
z ,
0 ;
~ ¡ PROPOSED
~ : 1 STOREY
: ADDIìlON de
; RECONSTRUCTION
2
4-
4.0m 11.2m
EXIST. 2 STOREY
BLDG.
EXIST. 1 STOREVD
PAINT BOOTH
DEMOLISHED
EXIST. DRIVEWAY
EXIST. WOOD FENCE --1
PROPER1Y UNE ]
9.15m (30'-0")
.....
f~ --
......,
<0'
..,:;"
12
'"
-.,
.~
5.3m(TYP.) L
13 .
I -0
PROPqSED ~
1 STOREY
ADDITION ~
: ;.
14-
15
16
~
..,
l~ E
E m
<0 -:
<0 on
.,;
+--'--
20.51m (57'-3-)
'"" "~ l-~
II I
~
I
].1
<O~
N~II
~2J~
10
6.5m
~(TYP)
9
a
,
;"
!:::.
8
E
<0
<0
N
N
7
EXIST. METAL FENCE
f':~
,Þt
Q)
~]j ;¡;,.
CD:;:1
C';bo
~~
"iIoS:
rn
9:12
';;;:I _oj
~ ~
1;. ~
ff~o
ikJ~
'E:" d
:, ':;'~
247
REPORT TO
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Report Number: PO 17-06
Date: February 27, 2006
From:
Neil Carroll
Director, Planning & Development
Subject:
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 27/05
Silverlane Estates Inc.
South Part of Lot 32, Concession 1
(Blocks 39 and 46, Plan 40M-2119 and Part 4, 40R-11901)
City of Pickering
Recommendation:
1.
That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 27/05 be APPROVED, to rezone
two Blocks to match the zoning of abutting land, to permit development of a
townhouse and a detached dwelling, on lands being Blocks 39 and 46, Plan 40M-
2119, and; to rezone two additional Blocks to allow for open space uses, on
lands being Part 4, Plan 40R-11901 (Blocks 16 and 18, Draft Plan of Subdivision
S-P-2002-06).
That the amending zoning by-law to implement Zoning By-law Amendment
Application A 27/05, as set out in Appendix I to Report PD 17-06, be
FORWARDED to City Council for enactment.
2.
Executive Summary: The subject lands are located on the east side of Altona
Road, south of Treetop Way, and are currently vacant (see Attachment #1 - Location
Map).
There are two components to this application. The first component of the application
proposes to rezone Blocks 39 and 46 on Plan 40M-2119 to coordinate the zoning of
these lands with the zoning of abutting parcels to the south. The second component of
this application proposes to rezone Blocks 16 and 18 on Draft Plan of Subdivision
S-P-2002-06 for open space uses, including a storm water management facility.
No additional development from what was previously approved by Council through Draft
Plan of Subdivision S-P-2002-06 and Zoning Amendment A 27/02 is being proposed on
the subject lands. The proposed By-law amendment is a "housekeeping" matter to
allow appropriate development to proceed in accordance with the intent of recent City
Council approvals.
It is recommended that this application be approved, and the draft by-law be forwarded
to City Council for enactment.
Financial Implications:
proposed development.
No direct costs to the City are anticipated as a result of the
248
Report PD 17-06
Date: February 27, 2006
Subject: Silverlane Estates Inc. (A 27/05)
Page 2
Background:
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
Comments Received
At the January 19, 2006, Public Information Meeting
(See text of Information Report and Meeting Minutes, Attachment #3)
. Todd Coles of Humphries Planning Group Inc, authorized agent, attended
and advised that he agreed with City staff's comment that the application
was technical in nature and advised that the proposal complies with the
City's policies and regulations pertaining to tree preservation;
. Jeff Blowers of Tilson Court requested clarification on the regarding the
application and expressed his concerns regarding the impact of the water
containment practices on the adjacent Altona Forest Area and requested
that a stop sign be installed at Calvington Drive and Strouds Lane;
. Valerie Chuvie of Granby Court expressed concerns with the impact of
development adjacent to conservation lands and provided comments
regarding the speed of traffic on Altona Road;
. Majorie Tonner of Calvington Drive objected to the requested zoning by-
law amendment to permit the development of a townhouse on Block 39
and commented that Stroud's Lane has become a very busy street;
Following the Information Meeting
. No resident comments have been received;
City Department and Agency Comments
Veridian Connections no objections;
Enbridge Gas Distribution
no objections;
no objections;
- the proposal is permitted by the policies of the
Durham Region Official Plan, and there are no
matters of provincial interest related to this
application;
Region of Durham
Planning Department
Development Control
Department
no comments on this application;
Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority
(TRCA)
no objections.
Report PD 17-06
249
Date: February 27,2006
Subject: Silverlane Estates Inc. (A 27/05)
Page 3
2.0
Discussion
2.1
The Rezoning of Blocks 39 and 46, Plan 40M-2119, to a zone category
identical to the abutting Blocks to the south is technical and considered
appropriate for coordinated development
The above noted blocks are located partially within Draft Approved Plan of
Subdivision S-P-2002-06 and partially within recently developed Subdivision
40M-2119, resulting in the Block within one plan being zoned differently than the
Block within the abutting plan. The split zoning for these Blocks requires a
Zoning By-law Amendment to coordinate zoning. The applicant requests that
Block 39 on Plan 40M-2119 be rezoned from "SD-7" - Semi-Detached Dwelling
Zone to "SA-8" - Single Attached Dwelling Zone to permit the development of a
townhouse on the subject property and, that Block 46 on Plan 40M-2119 be
rezoned from "SD- 7" - Semi-Detached Dwelling Zone to "S5" - Single Detached
Dwelling Zone to permit the development of a detached dwelling (see attachment #2).
This request is considered as technical/housekeeping and is recommended for
approval.
2.2
The Rezoning of Blocks 16 and 18, Draft Plan of Subdivision S-P-2002-06,
for open space uses including a storm water management facility is
appropriate
The applicant proposes to rezone Part 4, 40R-1190 1 (Block 16 and Block 18 on
Draft Plan of Subdivision S-P-2002-06) from "A" - Rural Agricultural Zone to "OS-
HL" - Open Space Hazard Lands Zone. The requested Zoning By-law
Amendment will allow these Blocks to be used for a storm water management
facility as well as other open space purposes, and to be conveyed to a public
authority (see attachment #2). Although these lands were originally contemplated
for storm water management purposes in the processing of the Draft Plan, they
were not subject to the original Statutory Public Meeting and, therefore, not
included in the previously recommended amending Zoning By-law (By-law
6585/05).
It is recommended that that the zone provisions for Block 16 and Block 18, Draft
Plan of Subdivision S-P-2002-06, be amended from "A" - Rural Agricultural Zone
to "OS-HL" - Open Space Hazard Lands Zone.
250
Report PD 17-06
Date: February 27, 2006
Subject: Silverlane Estates Inc. (A 27/05)
Page 4
2.3
The technical nature of this application generated some confusion among
adjacent property owners who attended the Statutory Public Information
Meeting
Several area residents who attended the Statutory Public Information Meeting
were under the impression that the applicant was proposing additional
development above and beyond what was previously contemplated by City
Council for the subject lands. Staff explained the nature of the application at the
Public Meeting and additional notation has been added to the applicant's
submitted plan to provide further clarification regarding the context of the
application. We believe clarification provided has alleviated residents concerns.
The applicant's proposal deals strictly with the implementation of zone provisions
for lands that have already been considered by City Council through the process
of Draft Plan of Subdivision S-P-2002-06 and Zoning By-law Amendment
Application A 27/02.
3.0
Applicant's Comments
The applicant has been made aware of the content of this report, has reviewed
the draft zoning by-law, and is in agreement with the recommendations of this
report.
Appendix:
Appendix I: Draft Implementing By-law
Attachments:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Location Map
Applicant's Submitted Plan
Text of Information Report
Minutes from Statutory Public Meeting
Report PD 17-06
Subject: Silverlane Estates Inc. (A 27/05)
')5~'
I- 1
Date: February 27,2006
Page 5
Prepared By:
~~
Lynda T ylor, MC¡ PP .
Manager, Development Review
RC:kb
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
1
Recommended forons' eration of
Pickering Ci n
Thomas J. Qu' Chief Administrative Officer
e
Approved I Endorsed By:
I ,RPP
ng & Development
252
APPENDIX I TO
REPORT PD 17-06
DRAFT BY-LAW
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 27/05
('). '5 'ì
~ J
APPENDIX I TO
REPORT PO 17-06
DRAFT BY-LAW
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 27/05
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO.
Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 3036, as
amended, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of
Durham on South Part of Lot 32, Concession 1, in the City of Pickering.
(A 27/05)
WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering deems it desirable to
permit the development of a townhouse dwelling, a single detached, and open space -
environmental protection uses on lands associated with Draft Plan of Subdivision
S-P-2002-06, in the City of Pickering
AND WHEREAS an amendment to By-law 3036, as amended, is therefore deemed
necessary;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF
PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1.
SCHEDULE "I"
Schedule "I" to By-law 3036, attached hereto with notations and references
shown thereon is hereby declared to be part of this By-law.
2.
AREA RESTRICTED
The provisions of this By-law shall apply to those lands in the South Part of
Lot 32, Concession 1, being Block 39 and Block 46, Plan 40M-2119, City of
Pickering, designated "SA-8" and "S5" on Schedule "I" attached hereto.
The provisions of this By-law shall also apply to those lands in the South Part of
Lot 32, Concession 1, Part 4 of Plan 40R-11901, in the City of Pickering,
designated "OS-HL" on Schedule "I" attached hereto.
254
3.
4.
-7-
GENERAL PROVISIONS
By-law 3036, is hereby amended only to the extent necessary to give effect to
the provisions of this By-law as it applies to the area set out in Schedule "I"
attached hereto.
EFFECTIVE DATE
This By-law shall come into force in accordance with the provisions of the
Planning Act.
day of
BY-LAW read a first, second, and third time and finally passed this
,2006.
..;:r<Ø
David Ryan, Ma 0 ~,
Debi A. Bentley, Clerk
DETAIL 1
/-------------,
r~
I I
I I
\ J
'\ /
-------------
~ AREA RESTRICTED
DETAIL 2
r- -:e_nnnnnn\}
5:-----~~------ J
l'
N
SCHEDULE I TO BY-LAW
PASSED THIS
DAY OF 2006 '1;~
I É
DAVID RYAN - MAY.
DEBI A. BENTLEY - CLERK
255
256
ATTACHMENT I I
REPORT I PO J>ló(",
TO
BLOCK 46
40M-2119
DRIVE
BLOCK 39
40M-2119
~---,
//~ ",
I ,
I \
,
, ,
I I
I I
\ I
\ I
\ I
, I
, ,
"""1----~/
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STROUDS
0
<i
0
0::
~---,)
// ", ,
" \
\
I \
I - . \
\ \ \:
\ I
\ I
, ,
" ,-
" /
'-,--
I
I
I
,
I
,
,
,
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
w
>
0::
0
ð
~
-!
-!
.~
0::
ë§
w
()
C.N.R.
SHEPPARD
City of Pickering
Planning & Development Department
PROPERlY DESCRIPTION CON 1, S PT LOT 32, 40R-11901, PART 4 & 4OR-20396, PART 1
OWNER SILVERLANE ESTATES INC. DATE: NOY.30,2005 DRAWN BY JB
ALE No. A 27/OS SCALE: 1 :5000 CHECKED BY RS
l'
IV
00 ou"""",
T.'onel [nl..'p,;se. Inc. ond ito ouppr;.,o. All "ghls Roo....d. Nolo pion of ou"'.y.
200$ "'PAC ond ito ouppr;.,o. All "ohIo R.......d. Nolo pion of Su..ey.
PN-11
ATTACHMENT I 6l TO
REPORT # PO /I}-OCL>.
257
INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANTS
SUBMITTED PLAN -
A27/05
/--"
/ BLOCK 39 '"
40M-2119 \
THE APPUCANT REQUESTS THE ZONING BY-LAW
BE AMENDED TO PERMIT
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A TOWNHOUSE
ON THE SUBJECT LANDS
/
(
\
\ PARTOFBLOCK1S/
'" DRAFT PLAN OF
~BDIVIS~ ~2õd2-o6
THE APPUCANT REQUESTS THE ZONING BY-LAW
BE AMENDED TO PERMIT
DEVELOPMENT OF A
DETACHED DWELUNG
ON THE SUBJECT LANDS
,.,
'"
GRANB Y
...
cé
'"
THE APPUCANT REQUESTS THE ZONING BY-LAW
BE AMENDED FROM 'A'-AGRICULTURALZONE
TO 'OS-HL' - OPEN SPACE HAZARD LANDS
TO PERMIT THE THE DEVELOPMENT
OF A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACIUTY
AND OTHER OPEN SPACE USES ON THE SUBJECT LANDS
l'
THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING,
PLANNING ct DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
INFORMATION ct SUPPORT SERVICES,
NOVEMBER, 2005.
1)5¡~'
'- ð
ATTACHMENT fI ,.3 TO
REPORT # PO j 7- ()~
Ciú/ 01
INFORMATION REPORT NO. 28-05
FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING OF
January 19, 2006
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC MEETING REQUIREMENTS
OF THE PLANNING ACT, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13
SUBJECT:
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 27/05
Silver Lane Estates Inc.
South Part of Lot 32, Concession 1
(Now Blocks 39 and 46, Plan 40M-2119 and 40R-11901, Part 4)
East of Altona Road and south of Strouds Lane
City of Pickering
1.0
PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
- the subject lands are located on the east side of Altona Road, south of
Treetop Way (see Attachment #1 - Location Map).
2.0
APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL
- this application consists of two parts (see Attachment #2):
Part 1
. the applicant proposes to rezone Block 39 on Plan 40M-2119 to permit
the development of a townhouse; the applicant also proposes to rezone
Block 46 on Plan 40M-2119 to permit the development of a detached
dwelling;
. the intended purpose for rezoning Blocks 39 and 46 is to match the zoning
of these blocks with the zoning on the abutting lands to the south;
Part 2
. the applicant further proposes to rezone Blocks 16 and 18 on 40R-11901
to allow for a stormwater management facility and other open space uses;
Information Report No. 28-05
ATTACHMENT # ..3 TO
REPORT # PO 1'2 -Q(Q
259.
Page 2
. Blocks 16 and 18 were originally considered for stormwater management
facility and open space purposes through the processing of Draft Plan of
Subdivision Application S-P-2002-06 and Zoning By-law Amendment
Application A 27/02;
. since these lands were acquired by the owner of S-P-2002-06 following the
Statutory Public Information Meeting, they were not the subject of a formal
public meeting and not dealt with in the recommended approval of the draft
plan of subdivision and amending zoning by-law.
4.0
OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING
4.1
Durham Reaional Official Plan
the subject lands are designated Living Area, Major Open Space and
Environmentally Sensitive Area;
lands within the Living Area designation are intended to be predominantly for
housing purposes;
lands within the Major Open Space designation are intended to be
predominantly for conservation, recreation, and reforestation;
- when considering development applications within or adjacent to lands
designated Environmentally Sensitive Area, the cumulative impact on the
environment should be taken into account;
- the proposal appears to conform with the Durham Region Official Plan;
4.2
Pickerina Official Plan
- the subject lands are designated as Urban Residential- Medium Density and
Open Space - Natural Area in the City of Pickering Official Plan and are also
located within the Altona Forest Policy Area;
lands within this designation are intended to be used primarily for
conservation, environmental protection, restoration, education, passive
recreation and similar uses;
City policy promotes the use of stormwater management practices through
the integration of stormwater quality and quantity features into the open space
system;
- the proposal appears to conform with the Pickering Official Plan; however, the
application will be assessed against the policies and provisions of the
Pickering Official Plan during the further processing of the application;
4.3
Hiahbush Neiahbourhood
- the subject lands are located within the Highbush Neighbourhood;
260
Information Report No. 28-05
!)
?;EF{¡fn II h) ...L2. .-./'V -..,
"'""~~- ~"...,"'~~....
Page 3
4.4
5.0
5.1
5.2
5.3
Zonina Bv-Iaw 3036
Blocks 39 and 46 on Plan 40M-2119 are currently zoned "SD-?" - Semi-Detached
Dwelling Zone;
- the applicant has requested that Block 39 be rezoned to "SA-8" - Single
Attached Dwelling Zone and Block 46 be rezoned to "S5" - Detached
Dwelling Zone to match the zoning provisions for abutting lands to the south;
Blocks 16 and 18 on 40R-11901 are currently zoned "A" - Rural Agricultural
Zone;
- the applicant has requested an appropriate zone category that would permit
open space uses.
RESULTS OF CIRCULATION
Resident Comments
none received to date;
Aaencv Comments
Regional Municipality of Durham
Planning Department
- advises that the application
conforms to the Regional Official
Plan, adequate municipal water
supply and sewer services are
available to the subject property and
that the application has been
screened in accordance with the
terms of the provincial plan review
responsibilities (see Attachment #3);
- no objections to the proposed
development, subject to certain
requirements being satisfied
(see Attachment #4);
- no objections; however, requests
that the developer contact Enbridge
Gas to discuss installation and
clearance requirements for
servicing and metering facilities
(see Attachment #5);
Veridian Connections
Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc.
Staff Comments
- the Planning and Development Department considers this application to be
technical in nature;
Information Report No. 28-05
~1
,~b-'iJ"¡' ,'"'".J<~""<¿,1:={¿f.,ç"~,,
1}6J>
t.. 1
Page 4
- the Department will conclude its position on the application after it has
received and assessed all comments from the circulated departments,
agencies and the public.
6.0
PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
- written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning
& Development Department;
oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting;
all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report
prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent
meeting of Councilor a Committee of Council;
if you wish to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision, you must
provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this
proposal;
if you wish to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal, you
must request such in writing to the City Clerk.
7.0
OTHER INFORMATION
7.1
Appendix No. I
list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City
Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing
report;
7.2
Information Received
- full scale copies of the Applicant's submitted plan are available for viewing at
the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department;
Company Principal
7.3
- the owner of the subject lands is Silver Lane Estates Inc.; the principal of
Silver Lane Estates Inc. is Frank Dodaro; the agent is Todd Coles from
Humphries Planning Group Inc.
,.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
Lynda Taylor, MCIP, RPP
Manager, Development Review
Rick Cefaratti
Planner II
RC:jf
Attachments
Copy: Director, Planning & Development
C')6.."!
... . 1'-
ATTACHMENT'. ... '7 TO
REPORT # PO I ?-6(/)
Minutes / Meeting Summary
Statutory Public Information Meeting
Council Chambers
Thursday, January 19, 2006
7:00 pm.
C¿iq o~
Attendees:
Councillor Ashe - Chair
Councillor Dickerson
Councillor Johnson
Councillor McLean
Lynda Taylor, Manager, Development Review
Geoff Romanowski, Planner II
Rick Cefaratti, Planner II
Joyce Yeh, Planner I
Alison Haines, Recording Secretary
6.
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 27/05
SILVER LANE ESTATES INc.
SOUTH PART OF LOT 32, CONCESSION 1
(NOW BLOCKS 39 AND 46, PLAN 40M-2119 AND 40R-11901, PART 4)
EAST OF AL TONA ROAD AND SOUTH OF STROUDS LANE
CITY OF PICKERING
1. Planner Comments
Rick Cefaratti, Planner II provided an overview of the application.
2. Applicant Comments
Todd Coles, Humphries Planning Group appeared on behalf of the applicant.
3. Comments from Members of the Public
Jeff Bowers
2002 Tillson Court
Jeff Bowers stated he is unclear of what is being proposed. He requested clarification
on the open water containment area. He stated that he would like to ensure that the
correct groups within the TRCA is made aware of the proposal and there is a water
table concern. Mr. Bowers is concerned with storm water management in the area.
He also suggested a stop sign at Calvington Drive and Strouds Lane.
Valerie Chuvie
Branby Court
Valerie Chuvie is concerned of future development in the conservation area near the
subject property. Additionally she commented that Altona road is extremely busy and
had witnessed several near accidents.
Page 1
CORPO228-2/02
,ATTACHMENT' 'Þj"n TO
Marjorie Tonner REPOR1 fI PO f7J ;"/i!
1991 Calvington Drive
Marjorie Tonner commented that Strouds Lane had become very busy and is
concerned that construction vehicles would be using Calvington drive.
"}6'"':
,i. .;
4. Planner Response
The Planner clarified that the original draft plan for the subdivision had previously
been approved by Council and this application is only to amend the zoning in order to
permit the building of the approved townhomes. The property is partially in the
original subdivision area and therefore required the change in zoning in order to allow
the dwelling to be constructed.
5. Chair Response
Clarified that no new dwelling, not previously approved, is being considered.
Addressed concerns of Altona Road stating this street had been recognized by the
Region of Durham as a priority area for revamping (sidewalks etc.) Also, a traffic
study had been completed on Strouds Lane with no concerns found but perhaps now
with the new development further studies would be required. The Chair further
advised that the City's Municipal Property and Engineering Division should be
contacted to investigate the necessity of a stop sign at Calvington Drive and Strouds
Lane.
Lynda Taylor, Manager, Development Review clarified that this proposal is only to
modify the zoning subdivision plans that have already been approved.
6. Applicant Response
The Applicant advised that they will work with the TRCA and tree preservation will be
complied with. Additionally Block 39 could not be alternated from its approved
development because of the size of the lot.
Page 2
CORPO228-2IO2
2. 6/
.:t
C¿ú¡ ,,~
REPORT TO
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Report Number: OES 08-06
Date: February 27, 2006
From:
Everett Buntsma
Director
Operations & Emergency Services
Subject:
Frenchman's Bay Stormwater Management Master Plan
Request for Proposal Professional Engineeering Services
RFP-13-2005
File: A-2130
Recommendation:
1. That Report OES 08-06 regarding the Frenchman's Bay Stormwater
Management Master Plan, Request for Proposal for professional engineering
services be received;
2. That the Proposal RFP-13-2005 submitted by Marshall Macklin Monaghan
Limited to develop a Stormwater Management Master Plan for Frenchman's Bay
be accepted;
3. That the total project cost of $144,855 including the proposal amount, project
management services and other associated project costs identified in the report
be approved.
4. That staff at the City of Pickering be given the authority to give effect thereto.
Executive Summary: At the Council Meeting of October 17, 2005 Resolution
#181/05 was passed authorizing City of Pickering staff, in conjunction with TRCA staff
to issue an Expression of Interest to qualified consulting firms to provide professional
services for the development of a Frenchman's Bay Stormwater Management Master
Plan. Staff were also authorized to short list the interested firms to a maximum of four
firms and issue a Request for Proposal.
A Request for Proposal for Prequalification of Professional Engineering Services,
Frenchman's Bay Stormwater Management Master Plan was issued as RFP-11-2005
and resulted in eight firms responding. An advertisement was placed on the OPBA, Bid
Navigator and City Website. The selection committee evaluated the submissions and
issued RFP-13-2005 Request for Proposal - Professional Engineering Services,
Frenchman's Bay Stormwater Management Master Plan to the four firms that were
rated the highest, based on the evaluation criteria and results of the evaluations.
The final proposals from the four firms were received January 16, 2006, reviewed and
evaluated by the selection committee and each firm provided a presentation on
February 15, 2006 as part of the overall evaluation. The selection committees'
265
Report OES 08-06
Subject:
Date: February 27,2006
Page 2
unanimous decision was to recommend the firm of Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited
having received the highest score in the evaluation.
Financial Implications:
1. PROPOSAL AMOUNT
RFP-13-2005
Labour
Disbursements
GST
Subtotal
GST Rebate
Total
$111,905
4,450
8.145
$124,500
(8,145)
$116,355
2. APPROVED SOURCE OF FUNDS
2005 Stormwater Management Budget 2410-6181 and 2410-6182
Description
Project Code
Source of Funds
Budget
Environmental Assessment
for the Krosno Creek
Watercourse
05-2410-005-04
Easement
Settlement
Agreement Reserve
$45,000
Frenchman's Bay
Rehabilitation - Phase I
Environmental Assessment
05-2410-005-03
Capital Paid from
Property Taxes
$100,000
FUNDS AVAILABLE
$145,000
3.ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTING SUMMARY
RFP-13-2005
Project Management Services (Gartner Lee Limited)
Krosno & Pine Creek Gauge Maintenance, Calibration and Flow
Data Evaluation
Contingency
Subtotal
GST
Total (Gross) Project Cost
GST Rebate
Total (Net) Project Cost
$116,355
15,000
10,000
3.500
144,855
10.140
154,995
(10.140)
$144,855
CORPO227-07/01
(()6r'-
(, .0
Report DES 08-06
Subject:
Date: February 27, 2006
Page 3
4.
I Project Cost under (over) Approved Funds
$1451
The Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer has reviewed the budgetary implications
and the financing of the expenditures contained in this report and concurs.
Background: Council Resolution #181/05 at the regular meeting of October 17,
2005 authorized staff to commence a process to select a consulting firm to develop the
Frenchman's Bay Stormwater Management Master Plan. The Master Plan will satisfy a
minimum of the first two phases of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment
process and include public contact and consultation.
City staff, TRCA staff and the project manager from Gartner Lee Limited prepared an
Expression of Interest document which formulated a Request for Proposal for
Prequalification of Professional Engineering Services, RFP-11-2005 which closed on
November 14, 2005. Eight submissions were received from the following firms.
1. Aquafor Beech
2. Marshall Macklin Monaghan
3. Phillips Engineering
4. Sabourin Kimble & Associates
5. Sernas Associates
6. The Municipal Infrastructure Group
7. Trow
8. TSH Engineers
A selection committee consisting of two staff from the Municipal Property & Engineering
Division, two staff from Supply & Services, one staff from Toronto & Region
Conservation and the project Manager from Gartner Lee met on November 29,2005 to
discuss and evaluate the prequalification submissions. The selection committee rated
the submissions from the following four firms the highest and they were subsequently
invited to submit proposals to provide professional engineering services through RFP-
13-2005.
1. Aquafor Beach
2. TSH Engineers
3. Philips Engineering
4. Marshall Macklin Monaghan
RFP-13-2005 was an invitation to the four pre-qualified consulting firms to submit
detailed proposals for the Frenchman's Bay Stormwater Management Master Plan.
The terms of reference contained more specific mandatory submission requirements,
and the evaluation criteria to be used to rate the proposals. All four consulting firms
submitted proposals by the closing date of January 16, 2006.
CORPO227-07/01
'1.'6""
{.. (
Report DES 08-06
Subject:
Date: February 27,2006
Page 4
The selection committee met on February 9, 2006 to score the proposals, with the
exception of marking them for presentations. Questions were prepared for the
upcoming presentations that were held on February 15, 2006. The selection committee
felt it would be valuable to have the representative from the City's Waterfront
Coordinating Committee who will sit on the Master Plan's Steering Committee attend
the presentations. The representative was given a copy of the four proposals and was
actively involved in the presentation process. It should be noted, however, that the
Waterfront Coordinating Committee representative was not a participant in the scoring
of the presentation or the proposals, or asked to provide a recommendation.
All four proposals and presentations were professionally done and were of high quality.
It was the selection committees' unanimous choice to recommend acceptance of the
proposal which scored the highest, submitted by Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited to
develop the Frenchman's Bay Stormwater Management Master Plan with a budget of
$116,355 plus GST.
Copies of the evaluation summaries for the prequalification process under RFP-11-
2005 and the request for proposal process RFP-13-2005 are attached to this report for
reference.
Upon approval of Pickering Council to retain Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited, the
Master Plan will commence and is anticipated to be complete by December 2006.
Included in the project cost is $10,000 to undertake maintenance and calibration of the
two stream gauges in Krosno Creek and Pine Creek, and to establish a stage-discharge
relationship based on the date collected over the years. This will provide valuable
background information to the Master Plan undertaking for these creeks. This work will
be undertaken by Ontario Hydrometric Services Ltd., who installed the gauges and
have been collecting the information on a monthly basis.
Attachments:
1.
2.
RFP-11-2005 Evaluation Summary of Average Total Scores
RFP-13-2005 Evaluation Summary of Average Total Scores
CORPO227-07/01
r¡6q
Report OES 08-06
Subject:
Date: February 27, 2006
Page 5
Prepared By:
Vera A. Fel emacher
Manager, Supply & Services
RH:ds
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
CORPO227-07/01
Everett B nt
Director
Operations & Emergency Services
RFP-11-2005
,ð,TTACHMENT#_.l.. TO REPORT#Qb-Og-O(Ó
--1- ot -.I-
2'6'J
Evaluation
Prequalification of Professional Engineering Services
Frenchman's Bay Stormwater Management Master Plan
Summary of averaqe total scores
Company Name Committee Member
I #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 Average Ranking
Score
Aquafor Beech 85 100 100 90 93 84 92 1
TSH Engineers 79 96 93 82 77 85 85.3 2
Philips Engineering 73 97 97 75 84 82 84.7 3
Marshall Macklin Monaghan 74 88 95 82 83 85 84.5 4
Sernas Associates 79 91 92 76 65 75 79.7 5
Sabourin Kimble & Associates 66 90 82 75 60 70 73.8 6
Trow 70 80 88 66 55 64 70.5 7
The Municipal Infrastructure Group 67 85 74 62 55 70 68.8 8
Date - November 29, 2005
Evaluation Committee Members:
OES Og-()~
("ì'7/1
Request for Proposal
No. RFP-13-2005
A'TTACHMEN1 :u
-1_ci_C_,
'-'
c
Professional Engineering Services
Frenchman's Bay Stormwater Management Master Plan
Evaluation Summary. AveraQe Total Scores
February 15, 2006
Company Name Committee Member
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 Average Ranking
Score
Aquafor Beech Limited 72 76 75 85 73 67 75 2
Marshall Macklin Monaghan 84 80 75 86 90 77 82 1
Limited
Philips Engineering Ltd. 67 63 69 80 71 53 67 4
TSH Engineers Architects 66 75 70 82 74 73 73 3
Planners
Evaluation Committee Members:
D. Dunn, Citý of PiG 'ng
Uf~~. ~~.:
M. Gadsovski - T CA
;;~r Lee
271
REPORT TO
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Report Number: OES 10-06
Date: February 27, 2006
From:
Everett Buntsma
Director, Operations & Emergency Services
Subject:
Construction Priorities for Regional Roads
- Within the City of Pickering
- File: A-2130
Recommendation:
1.
That Report OES 10-06 regarding Regional Road construction priorities within
the City of Pickering be received for information and forwarded to the Regional
Municipality of Durham
Executive Summary: The following Regional Road construction priorities listed in
the table below, identify the City's priorities for consideration by the Region of Durham.
PRIORITY ROAD NAME IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
1 BROCK ROAD Widening from Dellbrook Avenue to Fifth
Concession Road including CPR Grade
Separation south of Taunton Road to address
impacts created by the construction of Hwy.
407.
2 AL TONA ROAD Widening from Kingston Road to Strouds Lane
from 2 to 4 lanes.
3 KINGSTON ROAD Corridor Improvements from Walnut Lane to
Glenanna Road as per recommendations from
the Kinqston Road Corridor Study.
4 WHITES ROAD Widening from Oklahoma Drive to Hwy. 401
from 2 to 4 lanes including Intersection
Improvements at Oklahoma Drive/Granite
Court.
5 BROCK ROAD Widening from Bayly Street to Finch Avenue
from 5 to 7 lanes (immediate need for
additional southbound lane from Kingston
Road to Hiqhway 401).
6 FINCH AVENUE Siqnalization at Rosebank Road.
272
Report OES 10-06
Date: February 27, 2006
Subject: Construction Priorities for Regional Roads
Within the City of Pickering
Page 2
7 BAYLY STREET Intersection & Signalization Improvements at
Sandy Beach Road.
8 BROCK ROAD Widening from Fifth Concession Road to North
of Hwy. 7 from 2 to 4 lanes (the Brougham By-
pass).
9 KINGSTON ROAD Corridor Improvements from Steeple Hill to
Delta Boulevard as per recommendations from
the Kingston Road Corridor Study.
10 KINGSTON ROAD Corridor Improvements from Dixie Road to
Fairport Road as per recommendations from
the Kinqston Road Corridor Study.
11 KINGSTON ROAD Corridor Improvements from Brock Road to
Notion Road as per recommendations from
the Kingston Road Corridor Study.
12 FINCH AVENUE Intersection & Signalization Improvements at
Liverpool Road.
Financial Implications: Regional Road construction costs are borne entirely by the
Regional Municipality of Durham with the exception of streetlights, sidewalks and some
aesthetic improvements. Traffic Control Signals at intersections on Regional Roads
that do not meet warrants require funding to be provided by others.
Background: The City of Pickering's last report on Regional Road priorities was
Report OES 38-04 and was received by Council on December 20, 2004 through
Resolution #167/04. The report was forwarded to the Region of Durham for input into
their 2005 Budget and Four-Year Capital Forecast. The Region's 2005 Capital Budget
included $4.1 million of construction in Pickering and $22.3 million of major projects in
the four-year forecast. It was becoming evident that the Region was planning for major
road construction expenditures in Pickering in the near future.
Regional Works staff have prepared the 2006 Regional Roads Servicing and Financing
Study (Report #2006-J-01) and it was considered at the Finance & Administration and
Works Committees meeting on Wednesday, February 8, 2006. The report covers the
annual 2006 Road Capital Program and a Four-Year Forecast (2007-2010).
CORPO227-07/01
1"1"7"-
ff.... ,j
Report OES 10-06
Date: February 27, 2006
Subject: Construction Priorities for Regional Roads
Within the City of Pickering
Page 3
In 2006, the Region is proposing to advance the construction of the Brock RoadlCPR
Subway grade separation at an estimated cost of $4.5 million. This work was originally
forecast for 2007 but can now commence as soon as the temporary detour work that is
currently underway is complete.
Also included in 2006 is an additional south bound lane on Brock Road from Pickering
Parkway to Hwy 401 at an estimated cost of $300,000.
Property acquisition and utility relocation is proposed for 2006 on Brock Road from
Dellbrook Avenue to Taunton Road. This is in preparation for a $7.0 million widening
forecast for 2007.
An additional $50,000 is proposed in 2006 for the Whites Road at Granite Court
intersection project that was approved in 2005 with a budget of $900,000. This project
is scheduled to commence in spring 2006.
The Four-Year Capital Forecast includes four major road capital projects in Pickering.
Brock Road (Dellbrook Avenue - Taunton Road)
Altona Road (Regional Road Hwy 2 to Strouds Lane)
Brock Road (Bayly St to Finch Avenue)
Brock Road (Taunton Road to 5th Concession)
$7.0 million
5.6 million
5.2 million
3.5 million
2007
2008
2009
2010
The Region continues to channel its efforts into its major arterial roads such as Taunton
Road, Brock Road, Harmony Road and the BaylyNictoria/Bloor Street Corridor, in order
to accommodate increased traffic flow. The Brock Road and Altona Road projects are
very important to Pickering and it must be impressed upon the Region that delays to
these undertakings cannot be accepted.
The 2006 Capital Budget and Four-Year Forecast does not address corridor
improvements along Kingston Road as per the recommendations from the Kingston
Road Corridor Study. The Region should be requested to focus on this initiative and
include it in the next forecast as it is very important to the City of Pickering. Other
Pickering priorities that are not addressed in their report include intersection and
signalization improvements at Bayly Street at Sandy Beach Road, signalization of the
intersection of Finch Avenue at Rosebank Road, and intersection and signalization
improvements at Finch Avenue at Liverpool Road.
Report 2006-J-01 includes a recommendation for a Roads Network Rationalization Plan
to be adopted to realign responsibility of the road network to the applicable area
municipalities based upon, but not limited to, the findings in the 2002 Who Does What
Study. The Roads Plan shall include discussions with area municipalities to ensure:
a. A phase-in schedule be developed for 2007 with a phased transfer to be
completed within 5 years (no later than 2012);
CORPO227-07/01
27/~
Report OES 10-06
Date: February 27, 2006
Subject: Construction Priorities for Regional Roads
Within the City of Pickering
Page 4
b.
c.
d.
Roads be transferred in their current "as is" condition;
Roads transfer to occur in 2006 for any municipality who has funding
opportunities and is willing to assume all or a portion of a particular road; and
The plan would be reported upon annually in the Roads Servicing and
Financing Study.
Report 2006-J-01 also advises that the Ministry of Transportation has approached the
Region to propose a download of Hwy 7 from the York/Durham Townline easterly for 7
kilometers to Brock Road. Regional staff are reviewing the issue and will bring a
proposal to Council for consideration.
In response to correspondence received from Pickering Council, the Region is intending
on establishing a Regional Road Noise Abatement Policy in 2006 so that issues of
noise impacts from Regional Roads can be addressed. It is important to note that no
funding will be available for this initiative in 2006. If guidelines or a policy is approved in
2006, appropriate budget provisions will be considered by the Region in 2007.
The issue of traffic signal disentanglement is also addressed in the report. The Region
hired a consultant in 2005 to review and establish lines of communication with area
municipalities with respect to the determination, construction, operation and
maintenance of signalized intersections. Regional staff are advising that they are not
proceeding with these discussions at this time.
Overall, Regional Works Staff should be acknowledged for recognizing and addressing
Regional Road needs in the City of Pickering as indicated in their 2006 Regional Roads
Servicing and Financing Study. Many priorities that Pickering has recommended are
now included in the Region's capital forecast, and major projects in Pickering have
been identified in every year from 2006 to 2010.
The following is a list of all Regional Roads within the City of Pickering or along the
boundary limits, and are listed in order of Regional Road numbers. It is provided for
information only.
RR#1
RR Hwy. 2
RR#4
RR#5
RR #22
CORPO227-07/01
Brock Road from Montgomery Park Road to Uxbridge Townline
Kinaston Road from Toronto border (Rouge River) to Ajax boundary
Taunton Road from Markham Townline (York Road #30) to Ajax
boundary
Concession 9 Road (Central Street) from Markham Townline (York
Road #30) to RR #23 (Lakeridge Road) Whitby boundary
Bayly Street from RR #38 (Whites Road) to RR #24 (Church Street) Ajax
boundary
Report OES 10-06
Date: February 27, 2006
~f7"-
~' ~)
Subject: Construction Priorities for Regional Roads
Within the City of Pickering
Page 5
RR #23
RR #24
RR #27
RR #29
RR #31
RR #37
RR #38
lakeridae Road from Ajax boundary (Conc. 5 Road) to Uxbridge
Townline (Conc. 10 Road)
Church Street from RR #22 (Bayly Street) to Ajax boundary (CN Rail
line)
Altona Road from RR #2 (Kingston Road) to Whitevale Road thence
westerly to Markham Townline (York Road #30)
Liverpool Road from RR #22 Bayly Street to RR #37 Finch Avenue
Westnev Road from Fifth Concession Road (Ajax boundary) to Seventh
Concession Road, thence westerly to RR #1 Brock Road
Finch Avenue from RR #27 Altona Road to RR #1 Brock Road
Whites Road from south of Broadgreen Street to RR #4 (Taunton
Road)
Attachments:
NIA
Prepared By:
~'
RH:ds
Attachments
Everett
Director
Operations & Emergency Services
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
7
I
(). t"t C'
,-to
C¿ú¡ o~
REPORT TO THE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Report Number: OES 11-06
Date: February 27,2006
From:
Everett Buntsma
Director, Operations & Emergency Services
Subject:
Lease of City of Pickering lands to O.J. Muller Landscape Contractor Ltd.
Renewal of Lease Agreement for those lands comprising those parts of
Lot 19, Concession 3, Pickering, designated as Part 2, Plan 40R-7012,
save and except Part 2, Plan 40R-14541 and Part 3, Plan 40R-7012
File: A-2130
Recommendation:
1. That Report OES 11-06 regarding renewal of a lease agreement be received; and
2. That the request by O.J. Muller Landscape Contractor Ltd. to renew a lease for City
land on Brock Road for the purposes of cultivating the land for cash crops and to
store and market nursery stock that includes landscape materials be APPROVED.
3. That the Mayor and the City Clerk be AUTHORIZED to sign a renewal lease
agreement with O.J. Muller Landscape Contractor involving City lands, substantially
on terms set out in the form prepared by the City Solicitor.
Executive Summary: O.J. Muller Landscape Contractor Ltd. have been leasing
the property located on Brock Road, Pickering, and compromising those lands
consisting of a stone house and 6.074 acres to use and occupy the property or the
premises to cultivate the land for cash crops and to store market nursery stock. The
property and premises are located at 2710 Brock Road, Pickering, and compromising
those parts of Lot 19, Concession 3, Pickering, designated as Parts 2 and 3, Plan 40R-
7012.
The lease agreement expired on December 31, 2005 and a renewal lease agreement
has been prepared by the City Solicitor to extend the terms of the Original Lease with
the following modifications:
1. The term of the Renewal Lease shall have the same terms and conditions as in
the Original Lease.
2. The term of the Renewal Lease shall be month-to-month commencing January
1, 2006.
3. Either party shall have the option of terminating the Renewal Lease upon 60
days prior notice to the other.
It."
.v, '
Report to Council OES 11-06
Date: February 27, 2006
Subject: O.J. Muller Landscape Contractor Ltd.
Lease Agreement
Page 2
4. The amount of the rent payable by the Tenant to the Landlord monthly and every
month during the renewal term shall be $1 ,500/month plus GST.
5. The following words shall be added to section 1 of the Original Lease:
0 The Tenant acknowledges that the Landlord will be boarding up the stone
house on the Premises and will be decommissioning the well and septic
system on the Premises.
Financial Implications: Month-to-Month Rent of $1,500/month plus GST
Business taxes (to be determined)
Background: The subject property was deeded to the City as part of an
agreement with Veridian Connections (formerly known as Pickering Hydro Electric
Commission) in November 1999. Much of the property is natural woodlot ancillary to
the area used by the tenant.
The property is presently used as a nursery for a landscape business and the home on
the property was previously used for residential purpose, however, the following words
shall be added to section 1 of the "Original" Lease.
liThe Tenant acknowledges that the Landlord will be boarding up
the stone house on the Premises and will be decommissioning
the well and septic system on the Premises. II
The tenant has advised that they no longer require the use of the residential building.
Due to the aesthetic improvements required to the building and the issues with the well
and failing septic system, it is in the City's best interest to remove these components
from the lease, board up the house and decommission the well and septic system.
The term of lease has been changed from a yearly renewal to a month-to-month
commencing January 1, 2006. The lands are within the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood
which are subject to redevelopment in the near future.
The rent being recommended as the same to what the tenant was paying in previous
years. Any increase will require further notification to the tenant.
Attachments:
1.
Location Map
278
Report to Council OES 11-06
Subject: O.J. Muller Landscape Contractor Ltd.
Lease Agreement
Date: February 27, 2006
Page 3
Prepared By:
RH:ds
ATTACHI"1ENT#__l__- TO REPORT# OE:J, I /-u ((J
--'-oft
21G
SCAL[,
DATE:
2710 BROCK ROAD
REPORT TO COUNCIL
OPERA nONS & EMERGENCY
SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL PROPERTY &
ENGINEERING DIVISION
1 :7500
FEBRUARY 27/2006
L:\MPQnd£\ThemQUc Mapping \ MQPs \ MP&£ - Admin\RepQ'¡
280
Ciú¡ o~
REPORT TO THE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Report Number: OES 12-06
Date: February 27,2006
From:
Everett Buntsma
Director, Operations & Emergency Services
Subject:
Lease of City of Pickering lands to T. Arnts Loam Supply Ltd. Renewal of
Lease Agreement for those lands comprising those parts of Lot 19,
Concession 3, Pickering, and comprising that part of Part 37 and 40, Plan
40R-6934.
- File: A-2130
Recommendation:
1. That Report OES 12-06 regarding renewal of a lease agreement be received; and
2. That the request by T. Arnts Loam Supply Ltd. to renew a lease for City land on
Brock Road for the purposes of carrying on the business of the storage, sale and
supply of topsoil, sand, stone, pavers and related products be APPROVED.
3. That the Mayor and the City Clerk be AUTHORIZED to sign a renewal lease
agreement with T. Arnts Loam Supply Ltd. involving City lands, substantially on
terms set out in the form prepared by the City Solicitor.
Executive Summary: T. Arnts Loam Supply Ltd. have been leasing the property
located on Brock Road, Pickering, and compromising those lands consisting of 9.45
acres of rentable area located on Lot 19, Concession 3, Pickering, and comprising that
part of Parts 37 and 40, Plan 40R-6934.
The lease agreement expired on December 31, 2005 and a renewal lease agreement
has been prepared by the City Solicitor to extend the terms of the Original Lease with
the following modifications:
1. The term of the Renewal Lease shall have the same terms and conditions as in
the Original Lease.
2. The term of the Renewal Lease shall be month-to-month commencing January
1, 2006.
3. Either party shall have the option of terminating the Renewal Lease upon 60
days prior notice to the other.
4. The amount of the rent payable by the Tenant to the Landlord monthly and every
month during the renewal term shall be $1 ,583.33/month plus GST.
28'-1
-t
Report to Council OES 12-06
Date: February 27, 2006
Subject: T. Arnts Loam Supply Ltd.
Lease Agreement
Page 2
Financial Implications: Month-to-Month Rent of $1 ,583.33/month plus GST
Business taxes (to be determined)
Background: The property is presently used for the purposes of carrying on the
business of the storage, sale and supply of topsoil, sand, stone, pavers and related
products.
The term of lease has been changed from a yearly renewal to a month-to-month
commencing January 1, 2006. The lands are within the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood
which are subject to redevelopment in the near future.
The rent being recommended as the same to what the tenant was paying in previous
years. Any increase will require further notification to the tenant.
Attachments
1.
Location Map
282
Report to Council OES 12-06
Subject: T. Arnts Loam Supply Ltd.
Lease Agreement
Date: February 27, 2006
Page 3
Prepared By:
RH:ds
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Approved !-f1!dorsed y:
\
ni
" I
I 'I
I .
/ l\
I
U ma, D~ctor
s & Emergency Services
I
ATTACHMENT#_J TOREPORT1t ŒS \ 2. -o~
(at
28r:
~
í¡-\\~D
NTS
OAT[,
FEBRUARY 27/2006
LEASE AGREEMENT
ARNTS LOAM SUPPLY LTD.
OPERA nONS & EMERGENCY
SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL PROPERTY &
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SCALE,
L:\MPandC\ ThemaNo Mapp;ng\Maps\MP&£ - Adm;n\Repar¡
L
~
284
REPORT TO THE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Report Number: OES 13-06
Date: February 27,2006
From:
Everett Buntsma
Director, Operations & Emergency Services
Subject:
Lease of City of Pickering lands to 1317970 Ontario I nc. Renewal of
Lease Agreement for those lands comprising that part of Parts 37 and 40,
Plan 40R-6934.
- File: A-2130
Recommendation:
1. That Report OES 13-06 regarding renewal of a lease agreement be received; and
2. That the request by 1317970 Ontario Inc. to renew a lease for City land on Brock
Road for the purposes of carrying on the business of a golf-driving range located at
least 85 metres west of Brock Road and at least 6.1 metres south of the northerly
boundary of the premises and a minature golf-putting facility located at least 6.1
metres south of the northerly boundary of the premises and an accessory parking
area located between the golf-driving range and Brock Road and south of the
minature golf-putting facility be APPROVED.
3. That the Mayor and the City Clerk be AUTHORIZED to sign a renewal lease
agreement with 1317970 Ontario Inc. involving City lands, substantially on terms set
out in the form prepared by the City Solicitor.
Executive Summary: 1317970 Ontario Inc. have been leasing the property located
on Brock Road, Pickering, and compromising those lands consisting of 12.4 acres of
rentable area located in Lot 19, Concession 3, Pickering, and comprising that part of
Parts 37 and 40, Plan 40R-6934.
The lease agreement expired on December 31, 2005 and a renewal lease agreement
has been prepared by the City Solicitor to extend the terms of the Original Lease with
the following modifications:
1. The term of the Renewal Lease shall have the same terms and conditions as in
the Original Lease.
2. The term of the Renewal Lease shall be month-to-month commencing January
1, 2006.
285
Report to Council OES 13-06
Date: February 27,2006
Subject: 1317970 Ontario Inc.
Lease Agreement
Page 2
3. Either party shall have the option of terminating the Renewal Lease upon 60
days prior notice to the other.
4. The amount of the rent payable by the Tenant to the Landlord monthly and every
month during the renewal term shall be $1,458.33/month plus GST.
Financial Implications: Month-to-Month Rent of $1,458.33/month plus GST
Business taxes (to be determined)
Background: The property is presently used for the purposes of carrying on the
business of a golfing-driving range located at least 85 metres west of Brock Road and
at least 6.1 metres south of the northerly boundary of the premises; a minature golf-
putting facility located at least 6.1 metres south of the northerly boundary of the
premises, and an accessory parking area located between the golf-driving range and
Brock Road and south of the minature golf-putting facility.
The term of lease has been changed from a yearly renewal to a month-to-month
commencing January 1, 2006. The lands are within the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood
which are subject to redevelopment in the near future.
The rent being recommended as the same to what the tenant was paying in previous
years. Any increase will require further notification to the tenant.
Attachments:
1. Location Map
286
Report to Council OES 13-06
Subject: 1317970 Ontario Inc.
Lease Agreement
Date: February 27, 2006
Page 3
Prepared By:
RH:ds
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
,<
¡',IiEi'n~_". J" REPORT#-O.£5¿ / ,3--o(~
-t.. 0 ¡ _.J.~_.
r~ Q-4
("Utl
I
\f\\\<.D
OPERA nONS & EMERGENCY
SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL PROPERTY & L EAS E AG R E E M E N T
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SCAlE NTS ~~BRUARY27/2006 1317970 ONTARIO INC. LTD. (DRIVING RANGE)
L\MPand£\Themalic MappingIMapsIMPJ<E - Admin\Reporl
L
~
288
C¿iq c~
REPORT TO
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Report Number: CS 14-06
Date: February 27, 2006
From:
Gillis A. Paterson
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
Subject:
Changes to Proposed Body Rub Parlour By-law
File: L-2314
Recommendation:
1.
That Report CS 02-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be
received for information;
2.
That Report CS 14-06 regarding changes to the proposed Body Rub Parlour By-
law be received;
3.
That the attached draft by-law be enacted to provide for the licensing and
regulation of Body Rub Parlours within the City of Pickering, and
4.
That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be given the authority to
give effect thereto.
Executive Summary:
At the January 9, 2006 Executive Committee meeting, a public meeting was held for the
purpose of soliciting comments in relation to the proposed draft body rub parlour by-law,
in accordance with the Municipal Act notification provisions. The notice of the public
meeting was advertised in the Pickering News Advertiser on December 27, 2005, a
copy of which is enclosed as Attachment I to this report.
At that meeting, Report CS 02-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer,
dealing with the draft body rub parlour by-law was referred back to staff for the purpose
of soliciting comments from key stakeholders.
Financial Implications:
The licensing fees proposed have been amended to maintain a consistent set of fees,
instead of a large fee for a first licence and then a relatively minimal fee for renewals.
Licensing fees are outlined on Schedule "A" of the proposed by-law. All fees have been
analyzed in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Act.
289
Report CS 14-06
Date: February 27, 2006
Subject: Changes to Proposed Body Rub Parlour By-law
Page 2
Background:
By-law 5764/00, being the by-law regulating body rub parlours was reviewed
extensively by staff and a draft by-law was presented to the Executive Committee on
January 9, 2006 for public comment.
Further to the referral motion by the Executive Committee, the Clerk's Division received
comments from key stakeholders on the proposed draft by-law. Please note that the
Durham Regional Police Service supported the draft by-law as presented at the
January 9, 2006 meeting of the Executive Committee. Their comments are outlined in
their correspondence included as Attachment 2 to this report. Written comments from
the licensed body rub parlour owners have also been included as Attachment 3 to this
report. Further comments from the owners were received during meetings held with
Clerk's Division staff. A subsequent meeting was also held with Durham Regional
Police to review proposed changes to the by-law.
A summary outlining the sections of the draft by-law where the key stakeholders have
requested changes, comments solicited from Durham Regional Police Service, and the
resulting staff recommendations for changes are outlined in Attachment 4.
A revised draft by-law has been prepared incorporating the recommended changes and
is included as Attachment 5 to this report.
Attachments:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Copy of Notice of Public Meeting regarding proposed body rub parlour by-law
Correspondence outlining comments from Durham Regional Police Service
Correspondence from licensed body rub parlour owners
Summary of changes to the draft body rub parlour by-law
Revised draft by-law incorporating recommended changes
Report CS 02-06 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
Prepared By:
Approved I Endorsed By:
L
Debi Bentley,
City Clerk
s4$'{? ~.
'-
Gillis Paterson,
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
s ov---
Kim erly Thompson
Manager, By-law Enforcement Services
CORPO227-07/01
290
Report CS 14-06
Subject: Changes to Proposed Body Rub Parlour By-law
Date: February 27, 2006
Page 3
CORPO227-07/01
ATTACHMENT #1 TO REPORT#CS 14-06
(')9-":
(... Á
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
Body Rub Parlour By-law
TAKE NOTICE that the Executive Committee of Council of the Corporation of the
City of Pickering will hold a public meeting on Monday, January 9, 2006 at 7:30
pm in the Council Chambers, Pickering Civic Complex, One The Esplanade,
Pickering, Ontario, pursuant to the Municipal Act, to consider a body rub parlour
by-law.
The purpose of the meeting is to inform the public generally about the proposed
body rub parlour by-law and to solicit public input. Any person wishing to
address Council with respect to this matter must contact the undersigned on or
before noon of Friday, January 6, 2006 to register as a delegation. The Council
will also consider any written submissions.
Copies of the report and proposed by-law will be available on or after January 5,
2006 during regular business hours.
Any comments or requests for further information regarding the proposed body
rub parlour by-law may be directed to the Manager, By-law Enforcement
Services at 905.420.4660, ext. 2187.
Dated at the City of Pickering this 2ih day of December, 2006.
Debi A. Bentley, CMO, CMM III
City Clerk
I ATTACHMENT # 2
Durham Regional Police Service
TO REPORT # CS IJ'I-~
. V. White - Chief of Police. C. Mercier - Deputy Chief. R. Piukkala - Deputy Chief
Tuesday, 21 February 2006
Ms. Debbie Bentley
Clerk, City of Pickering
Pickering Civic Centre
One The Esplanade
Pickering, Ontario Ll V 6K7
Dear Ms. Bentley:
Re: Proposed City of Pickering Body Rub Parlour By-Law
As you are aware, the Durham Regional Police Service was invited to participate in the review
of the proposed amendments to the City of Pickering Body Rub Parlour regulations. We took
the opportunity to review the earlier draft By-Law and make submissions during a meeting
held on February 2, 2006, with licensing officials and the City Clerk.
The City then made certain changes to that draft and forwarded these to us for review. I can
indicate to you, on behalf of the Durham Regional Police Service, that we support the By-Law
as now amended.
Toll Free: 1-888-579-1520 x4210 - Facsimile: (905) 721-4267
77 Centre St. North, Oshawa, Ontario L1G 487 Oshawa (905) 579-1520 Toronto (905) 683-9100 Fax (905) 433-5053
Toll Free (905-705) 1-888-579-1520 Web Site www.drps.ca
I ATTACHMENT # ;3
t'}... 9' r:".' .'
t.: . ' .j;
'l"" '61 ,.. ~
'lG:ßE9DRJ41, £~ J.~ -ci&
I. c {...... r
-...¡c,- n -¡ ,../ ""-,.
January 9,2006
His Worship Mayor David Ryan
City of Pickering
And Honourable Members of Council
Corporation of the City of Pickering
One The Esplanade
Pickering, Ontario
LIV6K7
'. 'J',' /
Î---
¡--~~.:E NO.:
,..-....
!~~.~ \".:;~
; (~::L:-,\CiL
Re:
Draft Body Rub Parlour By-law
Report Number: CS 02-06
:JERVICES .
,...c..../:.¿&REC.
::.. .:._.~!~:"\RE
'i...::~~;.~:,-!?y-VEL.
, ." -¡,.-
""'-" ,,"--"-
Dear Sirs:
i.;!~.';';~ FiES
We undersigned, Renata Trent and Gabriela Kepinski, owners of the two existing
licensed body-rub parlours put forward for consideration by Council these written
submissions.
Recently we went through very lengthy procedure of re-zoning to allow our two locations
to be properly zoned for Body Rub. Only after successfully completing all the
requirements and receiving zoning approval were we informed that there is a drastic
change in the Body Rub By-law. We have been licensed by the City of Pickering for the
past 5 years and over that term we have fully complied with all the regulations applicable
to body rub parlours outlined in By-law 5764/00.
We take pride in the fact that we have a good record with the Police and City by-law
enforcement officers.
Why this sudden change and totally different set of By-laws to follow with so many
restrictions since you did not have a problem with us operating the businesses under the
"old" By-laws? Not even once there was a By-law infraction in either location.
It seems that the new body rub By-law is very similar to the one in Markham or Toronto.
Please have a look at the printout of the advertised massage parlours in Scarborough and
Markham, and for example compare the list with Pickering and Brampton spas.
Whenever municipalities implement By-law to prevent nudity (eg. Markham and
Toronto) number of unlicensed holistic spas, health studios, aromatherapies, etc. will
open up and you will not be able to control and govern them. It will require extensive
resources (By-law enforcement officers, Police, time and money) to investigate and
regulate these unlicensed establishments. So, for example the City of Brampton allows
only 8 establishments and that is the number of the existing spas. Why? Because the City
29' ,.
, ll.:t
I ATTACHMENT #3
_..:..:
TO REPORT # cs , Jif-(;b
offers reasonable by-laws to follow (similar to our "old" ones) and there is no problem
with unlicensed places,
\Ve operate licensed body-rub parlours which by statutory definition are adult
entertainment establishments; therefore the new hours of operation that you are proposing
are discriminatory, All the bars and other adult entertainment businesses are open till
2am, therefore it is very unreasonable to restrict our hours of operation between 8am -
9pm,
The sign provisions contravene the Charter. Since we are licensed, legitimate business
registered in the City of Pickering why we are not allowed to put up a sign just like every
other business,
We run our businesses in quiet, clean, discreet and respectful manner, and we personally
promise to ensure that this trend continues if you reconsider the above arguments,
Thank you in advance for taking the time to consider these comments,
y~
~.._' .-)
/ £,
( {é¡tß
~ /'í.,
GaÑÍcia ;Kepin~ki
1895 Clements Rd, #161
Pickering, On
"Aristocrats Spa"
Renata Trent
905 Dillingham Rd. #3
Pickering, On
"Pickering Angels"
(..VJ
Pickering Massage Parlours. Toronto-Exotic-
Massage.com
Make an appointment with Mya She is extraordinarily beautiful and her
reviews are stellar
Home EMail Us Discuss LoadMap GooqleMap Click [S] when phone # bad. Info
Pickering Angels is a very nice place. Hannah from SRM worked there before
........................................................................,... ........................................................."""",'.".'..'"
Aristcrat
1895 Clements Unit 161
Pickering
(905)427-5721'"
Map
Pickering Angels
905 Dillingham Unit 3
Pickering
(905)420-0320 -'.
LINK Map
..Go to top
http://www. toronto-ex oti c-massage. com/h tm1/li stIPi ckeri ng. h tm
08/0 112006
Scarborough Massage Parlours~ Toronto-Exotic-Massage.COn1
Make an appointment with Mya She is extraordinarily beautiful and her reviews are stellar
Home ::.:.L<L::;:,i.L..',).;:: C~.L:;:{\L:;::;: L.~i:;::<t:'::1::}Ji . Click 0 when phone # bad. .
Diamonds are a mans best best friend.
r\:
c.:
~~
:.>.
~
~
C"J
::c
š::
m
~
~
--I
a
:::a
m
-a
0
~
=1:1:
\D
'-
{:
\
C
(J"
~
)::å
n
:I:
s:
m
æ
-f
-
1\Jò
~
0
0"'-
r-..:
c.c
~ ~
301
I ATTACHMENT # .3 TO REPORT # C5 I JLf - 06
Brampton Massage Parlours. Toronto-Exotic-
Massage.com
Make an appointment with Mya She is extraordinarily beautiful and her reviews are stellar
Home EMail Us Discuss LoadMap GoogleMap Click 0 when phone # bad. Info
The best place for MPs in the Western Hemisphere
-______n-__n_------
Moulin Rouge
83 Kennedy Sf Unit 23
Brampton
(905)455~ 7640 -"-
LINK Map
Palace Spa Very New
168 Kennedy Sf Unit 7
Brampton
(905)487-1794 ,-
LINK Map
Sensations Closed
168 Kennedy Sf Unit 7
Brampton
(905)452-8889 ""
LINK Map
-------------______n
Mystique
116 Orenda Unit 6
Brampton
(905)451-9025 "-
Map
Paradise
71 West Unit 37
Brampton
(905)459-3462 ",
Map
Shiras
255 Rutherford
Brampton
(905)455-1422 "-
Map
_n_--------------
Necole
30 Intermodal Unit 26
Brampton
(416)697-5489 ",
LINK Map
Purple Rain New
221 Deerhurst Unit 2
Brampton
(905)458-2210"
Map
------
Steeles Royal
2565 Steeles Ef Unit 39
Brampton
(905)790-8210 '"
LINK Email Map
, .. "........._n.."" ,..
ATTACHMENT 4
SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO DRAFT BODY RUB PARLOUR BY-LAW
By-law Section Requested Stakeholder Comments Durham Regional Police Staff
Change Comments Recommendation
By
Stakeholders
1. Definitions Removal of nfa In agreement Remove adult
adult entertainment service
entertainment definition, term no longer
service referenced in proposed
definition by-law, see removal of
section 5. (p)
5.(d) Removal of This requirement was felt to DRP did not support this No change to section 5 (d)
No owner or operator requirement for be a financial hardship for proposed change. While the recommended.
may permit a body-rub a licensed one of the Body Rub Parlour requirement to have two staff
parlour to be open for operator to be owners. Cameras in the present at all times resolved
business unless the present during lobby were the preferred the safety issues of having a .
owner or operator is in all business method of security, which single female staff person
attendance in person hours, change are also used as a method to working alone, another issue
to require two monitor the number of was raised by DRP. The
staff present customers reported by staff. operator is a person who
during all A suggestion of two staff accepts responsibility for the
business hours people to be present during operation of the business and
all hours of operation was all activity occurring on the
viewed as a compromise. premises. Without an
operator, an owner can
simply claim ignorance of an
illegal activity and state that it
would not have been
permitted had they been
aware. The requirement for
an operator is similar to
establishments serving
alcohol. A licensed operator
accepts legal responsibility
for all business operations.
"'"
0
l'\)
!:i
i
~
d
::c
ra
~
-t
-
I~
~
By-law Section
5. (m)
No attendant may
provide a body rub at
a body rub parlour
unless there is in
attendance at the
premises a licensed
body-rub parlour
owner or operator who
does not provide
body-rubs.
5. (0)
Every attendant at a
body rub parlour shall
be clothed in a
manner such that
each such person's
pubic and genital
area, and in the case
of a woman, her
breasts are fully
covered by an opaque
material
Requested
Change
By
Stakeholders
Removal of
requirement for
a licensed
operator to be
present during
all business
hours, change
to require two
staff present
during all
business hours
Removal of
requirement for
attendants to
be clothed.
Change
stipulation to
include public
reception area
only.
Page 2
Stakeholder Comments
See comments regarding
5. (d)
Both body rub parlour
owners indicated the
business caters to men who
want to see naked women.
It is regulated as an adult
entertainment industry due
to the nature of the business.
Changing the section to
address public reception
areas only ensures no one
walking by will be offended.
Durham Regional Police
Comments
See comments regarding
5. (d)
DRP were in agreement that
requiring the attendants to
remain clothed was
somewhat contradictory in
regulating an adult
entertainment establishment.
Staff
Recommendation
No change
recommended to
section 5. (m)
Recommend revision of
section 5. (0) to:
"Within the public
reception area, every
attendant at a body rub
parlour shall be clothed in
a manner such that each
such person's pubic and
genital area, and in the
case of a woman, her
breasts are fully covered
by an opaque material
;s
:Þi
C":I
:I:
š:
m
2
---4
IE
1°
~ :D
f~
1=0
r-i
!::t:I:
I~
a
()"
'W
Ó
<:".j
Page 3
Requested Stakeholder Comments Durham Regional Police Staff
By-law Section Change Comments Recommendation
By
Stakeholders
5. (p) Removal of The services provided in a DRP agreed that body rub Recommend removal of
No person may section. body rub parlour are adult parlours are regulated as section 5. (p)
provide or receive any entertainment services. adult entertainment services,
adult entertainment Suggest implement and the section did not clearly
services or any provisions regulating define what was prohibited.
services designed to touching included in Reviewed sections in
appeal to erotic or Mississauga's body rub Mississauga's by-law and
sexual appetites in a parlour by-law. agreed more appropriate.
body rub parlour.
5. (r) Removal of Prefer regulations in place in DRP advised defining what Recommend revision of
Every owner shall post second Mississauga. appeals to erotic or sexual section 5. (r) , now section
and maintain in the sentence in appetites could be difficult. 5. (q) to:
lobby or entrance of required sign No objection to remove Every owner shall post
the body rub parlour, wording. "The wording proposed for sign. and maintain in the lobby
in a manner that is by-law or entrance of the body
satisfactory to the regulating this rub parlour, in a manner
Licensing Officer, a premise makes that is satisfactory to the
sign which provides as it an offence Licensing Officer, a sign
follows: "This premise for any person which provides as follows:
is licensed as a body to provide "This premise is licensed
rub parlour by the City services in a as a body rub parlour by
of Pickering. The By- body rub the City of Pickering".
law regulating this parlour that are
premise makes it an designed to
offence for any person appeal to erotic
to provide services in or sexual
a body rub parlour that appetites.
are designed to
appeal to erotic or
sexual appetites.
~
Ç)
,.þ.
~
:Þ
C':)
:I:
s:
m
Z
--f
~I
--I I
~,
m
LJ
0
:c
--f
:t:I:
IQ
,
<::'J
(;'~
Page 4
By-law Section Req uested Stakeholder Comments Durham Regional Police Staff
Change By Comments Recommendation
Stakeholders
5. (s) Permit the Body Rub Parlours do not DRP agreed with this request Recommend removal of
No attendant shall continuation of cater to clients looking for a on the condition the section 5. (s), now
provide or offer to services legitimate massage. The previously discussed sections section 5. (r) and insert:
provide services to provided in the customers are there to see from Mississauga's by-law "No Owner shall: Permit
any person unless nude. nude women, which is why would be implemented. any attendant to touch, sit,
such person's pubic they are defined as adult or rest on, or make any
and genital area, and entertainment businesses. physical contact with the
buttocks, and, in the To remove the ability to breasts, buttocks, genital
case of a woman, her provide a nude massage or pubic areas of any
breasts, are means they are no longer other person;" Also insert
completely and adult entertainment requirement for attendant
opaquely covered. establishments. as section 5. (t), "No
attendant shall make any
physical contact with the
breasts, buttocks, genital
or pubic areas of any
patron"
5. (t) As above. As above. As Above Recommend removal of
No owner or operator section 5. (t), now section 5.
shall permit any (s) and Insert:
attendant to provide or "No Owner shall: Permit any
person to touch, sit, or rest
offer to provide on, or make any physical
services to any person contact with the breasts,
unless such person's buttocks, genitals or pubic
pubic and genital areas of any attendant"
area, and buttocks Also insert requirement for
and, in the case of a attendant as section 5. (u),
woman, her breasts, "No attendant shall permit
are completely and any patron to touch, sit or
opaquely covered. rest on, or make any
physical contact with the
breasts, buttocks, genital or
pubic areas of any other
person."
~
)::Ii
n
:I:
3:
rn
:2:
--t
~
--I
0
:xJ
rn
-c
0
:xJ
--t
=1:8: n
~ (\
V
-=-' W
~ò
6, L;;
By-law Section
6. (a) Signs &
Advertisements
No person may erect
or maintain any of the
following signs in
respect of a body rub
parlour or in respect of
any body rubs
provided from such
premises:
- awning sign
- canopy sign
- projecting sign
- inflatable sign
- portable sign
- trailer sign
- ground of pylon sign
- sandwich board sign
1. (e) Every massage
room shall be equipped
with a window to permit
observation of the
provision of body rubs by
third parties. The window
must be 8cm wide by
13cm tall clear glass,
located in the door to
each massage room at a
height of not less than
1.5m and not greater
than 1.1m and must not
be obstructed in any
way.
Requested
Change
By
Stakeholders
Body rub
parlour owners
requested they
be permitted to
utilize various
means of
portable
advertisements
Request
change
requirement to
peep hole,
eliminate
window.
Page 5
Stakeholder Comments
Questioned how their
business could be treated
differently than others.
Believe peephole would
provide the same ability to
monitor. They are already in
place in one of the body rub
parlours.
Durham Regional Police
Comments
Municipal Act clearly sets out
the ability to regulate adult
entertainment industries
differently than other
businesses. Do not support
changes to this section of the
proposed by-law.
DRP did not support the
change to a peephole rather
than a window. They did
agree the size of the window
could be reduced. Peepholes
do not permit a proper view
into the room to determine
the activity inside.
Staff
Recommendation
Recommend no change to
section 6. (a)
Recommend changing
size of window in section
7. (e) to 6 cm wide by 6
cm tall. No other change
to this section.
(.~
<:::>
OJ
Þ
~I
~
:r:
3:
m
Z
--I
~.
--I
0
:D
m
-c
0
:D
--I
*'=1°
(;'.
~
\
o.
CJ
Page 6
By-law Section Requested Stakeholder Comments Durham Regional Police Staff
Change By Comments Recommendation
Stakeholders
7. (f) Remove Customers prefer reduced DRP advised there must be a Recommend removal of
Every body rub parlour requirement for lighting while receiving provision to require enough requirement for light that
shall be provided with light to be massage. Similar reduced light to ensure an inspection is uniformly distributed
adequate ventilation uniformly lighting when massage through the window can view throughout the premises.
and with lighting that is distributed. performed by RMT. the activity in the massage Change section 7. (f) to:
adequate to ensure room. Every body rub parlour
visibility and that is shall be provided with
uniformly distributed adequate ventilation and
throughout the with lighting that is
premises. adequate to ensure
visibility to permit
observation of activity in
each massage room from
the viewing window in the
door.
8. (i) Request Body Rub parlours, by DRP were not opposed to Recommend change to
No owner or operator extension of statutory definition are adult extending the hours of section 8. (i) as follows:
may permit a body rub operating entertainment operation. A suggestion was No owner or operator may
parlour to be open for hours to 2 am. establishments; therefore the made to change the wording permit a body rub parlour
business and no new hours of operation are of the by-law to read, "No to be open for business
attendant at a body discriminatory. All bars and provision of service will and no attendant at a
rub parlour shall other adult entertainment extend past 2 am." body rub parlour shall
provide body rubs in a businesses are open until 2 provide body rubs in a
body rub parlour am, therefore it is body rub parlour except
except between the unreasonable to restrict the between the hours of 9
hours of 8 am and 9 hours of body rub parlour am and 2 am on any
pm on and given day. operation as proposed. given day, with no
provision of service
extending past 2 am.
~
J>
C'J
:I:
:s:
m
:z
-4
~
-4
0
::c
m
-a
CJ
::c
-4
~
n
v'
(,;..)
O~
-.J e:-.
Page 7
By-law Section Requested Stakeholder Comments Durham Regional Police Staff
Change By Comments Recommendation
Stakeholders
26. Every person Concerns landlord will not authorize a DRP suggested section be Recommend change to
applying for a body lease cannot lease, unless proof can be changed to "within 5 days of section 26 as follows:
rub parlour licence be signed until provided that the tenant has occupying space, every Within 5 days of
shall file with the business a valid licence. person applying for a body occupying the premises to
Licensing Officer licence issued. rub parlour licence shall file be licensed as a body rub
documentation with the Licensing Officer parlour, every person
satisfactory to the documentation satisfactory to applying for a body rub
Licensing Officer the Licensing Officer parlour licence shall file
demonstrating the demonstrating the applicant's with the Licensing Officer
applicant's right to right to possess or occupy the documentation
possess or occupy the premises and if any applicant satisfactory to the
premises and if any is not the registered owner of Licensing Officer
applicant is not the the property upon which the demonstrating the
registered owner of body rub parlour is to be applicant's right to
the property upon located, such person shall file possess or occupy the
which the body rub with the Licensing Officer a premises and if any
parlour is to be copy of their lease, if any, and applicant is not the
located, such person a copy of any other document registered owner of the
shall file with the constituting or affecting the property upon which the
Licensing Officer a legal relationship relating to body rub parlour is to be
copy of their lease, if the said lands or premises located, such person shall
any, and a copy of any between said applicant and file with the Licensing
other document the registered owner. Officer a copy of their
constituting or lease, if any, and a copy
affecting the legal of any other document
relationship relating to constituting or affecting
the said lands or the legal relationship
premises between relating to the said lands
said applicant and the or premises between said
registered owner. applicant and the
registered owner.
(...:
ç:
0
~
:Þï
n
::c:
s:
m
2
--f
~
--f
0
:D
m
-c
Q
:D
--f
/;
-
-t
,
<::).
<5"
'Joe
oj, ' "-,
ATTACHMENT #5 TO REPORT CS 14-06
BODY RUB PARLOUR BY-LAW
WHEREAS Sections 150 and 151 of the Municipal Act, 2001 authorize Council to pass by-
laws that license, regulate and govern adult entertainment establishments;
AND WHEREAS Council has determined that the location of body rub parlours must be
regulated to ensure that the use is compatible with the neighbourhood and their location or
number does not create a nuisance;
AND WHEREAS Council has determined that licensing owners, operators and attendants
of body rub parlours protects consumers and contributes to their health and safety by
regulating access, cleanliness, and prohibiting illegal services;
AND WHEREAS to enhance professionalism and to help prevent illegal services from
being offered or obtained, while still allowing legitimate services to be provided, Council
has deemed that specified areas of the body may not be touched;
AND WHEREAS Council has determined that consumers should be protected from
unknowingly entering a bawdy-house when seeking a massage at a body rub parlour;
AND WHEREAS Council has determined that certain restrictions on behaviour of both
patrons and attendants reduces transmission of disease that would have an adverse effect
on the health of both the patrons and attendants;
AND WHEREAS Council has determined that free and unobstructed access to rooms in
body rub parlours contributes to the safety of both attendants and patrons therein;
AND WHEREAS Council has determined that licensing owners and operators of body rub
parlours protects consumers as there is a record of licence holders and the ability to
require legal and honest operation of such businesses and to hold licensees responsible
when the business is not conducted in accordance with the law or with integrity;
AND WHEREAS Council has determined that the ability to add conditions to, suspend,
revoke or refuse licences encourages owners and operators of body rub parlours to
comply with the by-law requirements;
AND WHEREAS Council has determined that the ability to enforce the provisions of this
By-law through charges under this By-law also encourages owners and operators of body
-( .'"
3.1V
2
ATTACHMENT #5 TO REPORT CS 14-06
rub parlours to comply with the by-law requirements;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering ENACTS AS
FOLLOWS:
DEFINITIONS
1.
In this By-law,
"attendant" means a person who, in pursuance of a trade, business or
occupation, provides body-rubs at a body-rub parlour;
"body-rub" includes the kneading, manipulating, rubbing, massaging,
touching or stimulating by any means of a person's body or part thereof, but
does not include medical or therapeutic treatment given by a person
otherwise duly qualified, licensed or registered to do so under the laws of the
Province of Ontario;
"body-rub parlour" is included in the definition of 'adult entertainment
parlour' in the Municipal Act, 2001 and includes any premises or part thereof
where a body-rub is performed, offered or solicited in pursuance of a trade,
calling, business, or occupation, but does not include any premises or part
thereof where the body-rubs performed are for the purpose of medical or
therapeutic treatment and are performed or offered by persons otherwise
duly qualified, licensed or registered so to do under the laws of the Province
of Ontario;
"City" means The Corporation of the City of Pickering;
"Council" means the Council of the City;
"licence" means an authorization under this By-law to carry on the trade,
calling, business or occupation specified therein;
"Licensing Officer" means a person appointed by the City to issue
licences;
"Medical Officer of Health" means the Medical Officer of Health for The
Regional Municipality of Durham;
"operator" includes a person who, alone or with others, operates, manages,
supervises, runs or directs the trade, calling, business or occupation carried
on at a body-rub parlour;
"owner" includes a person who, alone or with others, owns or controls the
trade, calling, business or occupation carried on at a body-rub parlour or
who directs the activities of an operator and includes a person who is the
3.11'
3
ATTACHMENT #5 TO REPORT CS 14-06
tenant or licensee in respect of premises which are utilized as a body-rub
parlour;
"provide" when used in relation to body-rubs includes offering to provide
or causing or permitting the provision of a body-rub and "provides",
"providing" and "provision" have corresponding meanings; and
"sign" includes any sign as defined pursuant to the City's By-law, as
amended.
GENERAL REGULATIONS
2.
3.
4.
5.
(c)
(d)
No person may be an owner of a body-rub parlour without making application for,
obtaining and maintaining, pursuant to the terms of this By-law, a body-rub
parlour licence.
No person may be an operator of a body-rub parlour without making application
for, obtaining and maintaining, pursuant to the terms of this By-law, a body-rub
parlour operator's licence.
No person may be an attendant in a body-rub parlour without making application
for, obtaining and maintaining, pursuant to the terms of this By-law, an
attendant's licence.
No person may be an owner or operator of a body-rub parlour or be an attendant or
provide any body-rub in a body-rub parlour except in compliance with the following
regulations:
(a)
No person may provide body-rubs in a body-rub parlour to any person
under the age of eighteen years and no person under the age of eighteen
years may be allowed to enter or remain in any part of a body-rub parlour.
(b)
Each owner or operator shall ensure that there is posted in a prominent
location at the entrance to the body-rub parlour a sign indicating that no
person under the age of eighteen years may enter or remain in such
premises.
No owner or operator may permit any employee or person under contract
to work at a body-rub parlour unless such person is at least 18 years of
age and such person has been instructed with regard to the regulations of
this By-law and complies with these regulations.
No owner or operator may permit a body-rub parlour to be open for business
unless the owner or operator is in attendance in person.
312
(I)
(m)
(n)
(0)
4
ATTACHMENT #5 TO REPORT CS 14-06
(e)
With the exception of patent medicines and prescription drugs required for
medicinal purposes, no person may take, consume or have alcohol or
drugs in their possession in a body-rub parlour.
(f)
No owner or operator may permit any person who appears to be
intoxicated by alcohol or a drug to enter or remain in a body-rub parlour.
(g)
No person may advertise or promote a body-rub parlour or the provision of
body-rubs at a body-rub parlour except in accordance with the provisions
of this By-law respecting "Signs and Advertisements".
(h)
No owner or operator may permit a body-rub parlour to open or to remain
open for business except in compliance with the provisions of this By-law
respecting "Hours of Operation".
(i)
No person may own or operate a body-rub parlour except in compliance
with the provisions of this By-law respecting "Locational Restrictions and
Limitations on Number".
(j)
No person may own or operate a body-rub parlour except in compliance
with the provision of this By-law respecting "Design of Premises".
(k)
Every owner and operator shall keep their licence certificate issued in
respect of a body-rub parlour posted in a conspicuous place in the said
premises in a manner satisfactory to the Licensing Officer at all times
during the currency of the licence.
No owner or operator may permit any attendant to provide body-rubs at a
body-rub parlour unless such attendant is licensed pursuant to the
provisions of this By-law and their licence has not expired, been revoked
or suspended.
No attendant may provide a body-rub at a body-rub parlour unless there is
in attendance at the premises a licensed body-rub parlour owner or
operator who does not provide body-rubs.
An owner shall enter into a written contract for services between every
operator and every attendant at a body-rub parlour and such contracts shall
be made available to a Licensing Officer upon request for inspection at any
time during business hours of the body-rub parlour and during all times
when body-rubs are provided, and shall be retained by an owner or operator
for a period of six months after the termination or completion of such
contract.
Within the public reception area, every attendant at a body rub parlour shall
be clothed in a manner such that each such person's pubic and genital area,
(u)
(v)
(w)
(x)
(y)
Jl.J
5
ATTACHMENT #5 TO REPORT CS 14-06
and in the case of a woman, her breasts are fully covered by opaque
material.
(p)
No owner or operator may use or permit to be used any camera or other
photographic or recording device at a body-rub parlour by any person.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a public health inspector acting under the
direction of the Medical Officer of Health, the Licensing Officer, a peace
officer or a Municipal Law Enforcement Officer may use a camera or other
photographic or recording device at a body-rub parlour during the course of
an inspection or investigation thereof. In addition, an owner or an operator
may maintain a photographic device in the entrance lobby of the premises
for security purposes.
(q)
Every owner shall post and maintain in the lobby or entrance of the body rub
parlour, in a manner that is satisfactory to the Licensing Officer, a sign which
provides as follows: "This premise is licensed as a body rub parlour by the
City of Pickering."
(r)
No owner shall permit any attendant to touch, sit, or rest on, or make any
physical contact with the breasts, buttocks, genital or pubic areas of any
other person.
(s)
No owner shall permit any person to touch, sit, or rest on, or make any
physical contact with the breasts, buttocks, genitals or pubic areas of any
attendant.
(t)
No attendant shall make any physical contact with the breasts, buttocks,
genital or pubic areas of any patron.
No attendant shall permit any patron to touch, sit or rest on, or make any
physical contact with the breasts, buttocks, genital or pubic areas of any
other person.
Every body-rub parlour owner and operator shall ensure that no services
are provided at the body-rub parlour other than in accordance with the
requirements of this By-law.
No person shall provide services in a body-rub parlour unless the owner of
the body-rub parlour holds a body-rub parlour licence, which has not
expired, been revoked or suspended.
No person shall be an operator of a body-rub parlour unless the owner of
the body-rub parlour holds a body-rub parlour licence, which has not
expired, been revoked or suspended.
Every attendant shall ensure the window provided to permit the
observation of body-rubs by third parties remains unobstructed.
.JlI'"
~ 't
6
ATTACHMENT #5 TO REPORT CS 14-06
(z)
No person, while acting as an owner or operator, shall perform any body-rub
services.
SIGNS AND ADVERTISEMENTS
6.
No person may erect or maintain any sign advertising a body-rub parlour or the
body-rubs provided from such premises except in accordance with City by-laws,
including the City Sign By-law, as amended. Notwithstanding the provisions of
the City Sign By-law, as amended, no person may erect or maintain any sign
advertising a body-rub parlour except in accordance with the following additional
regulations:
(b)
(c)
(d)
(a)
No person may erect or maintain any of the following signs in respect of a
body-rub parlour or in respect of any body-rubs provided from such
premises:
- awning sign
- projecting sign
- portable sign
- ground or pylon sign,
- canopy sign
- inflatable sign
- trailer sign
- sandwich board sign
No person may circulate, post, distribute or cause to be circulated, posted,
or distributed any poster, flyer, handbill or other form of printed sign on
premises or locations other than the body-rub parlour, with the exception
of advertising located in a newspaper or in the Yellow Pages.
Nothing within this By-law shall be deemed to constrain any person from
erecting or maintaining any sign or advertising on any interior wall of a
body-rub parlour, provided the content of such sign is not visible from the
exterior of the body-rub parlour.
No person may erect or maintain any sign or advertising in respect of a
body-rub parlour which includes any letters, markings, symbols, pictures
or representations except the name of the body-rub parlour as recorded
on the application for licence and any registered copyright logo or symbol,
provided a copy of such logo or symbol is filed with the Licensing Officer
as part of the licensing process.
DESIGN OF PREMISES
7.
No person may be an owner or operator of a body-rub parlour except in
accordance with the following regulations:
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
0)
~1.r-
""', '-"
7
ATTACHMENT #5 TO REPORT CS 14-06
(a)
The owner or operator shall provide the Licensing Officer with a floor plan
showing the designated room or rooms for the provision of body-rubs and
no person may provide body-rubs in any other room, cubicle, enclosure or
partitioned area located within the body-rub parlour. In the event that the
owner or operator wishes to amend the floor plan, he shall first file with the
Licensing Officer a copy of the amended floor plan and shall not proceed
to make such alterations without first obtaining the approval of the
Licensing Office.
(b)
Save and except for one room designated by the owner or operator for
use as an office and one room designated by the owner or operator as a
storage room, every owner or operator shall ensure that no means of
access to any room, cubicle, enclosure or partitioned area in a body-rub
parlour is equipped or constructed with a locking device of any kind or with
any other device or structure which could delay or hinder anyone from
entering or obtaining access to such area.
(c)
During the hours of operation of a body-rub parlour the owner, operator
and attendant shall ensure that the principal means of access into the
body-rub parlour is unlocked and available so that anyone coming into the
body-rub parlour may enter therein without hindrance or delay.
(d)
No premises or part thereof used as a body-rub parlour shall be used as a
dwelling or for sleeping purposes or contain therein any furniture which is
commonly used or which may be used for sleeping purposes.
(e)
Every massage room shall be equipped with a window to permit observation
of the provision of body rubs by third parties. The window must be 6 cm
wide x 6 cm tall clear glass, located in the door to each massage room at a
height of not less than 1.5 m and not greater than 1.7 m and must not be
obstructed in any way.
Every body-rub parlour shall be provided with adequate ventilation and with
lighting that is adequate to ensure visibility and to permit observation of
activity in each massage room from the viewing window in the door.
Every body-rub parlour and all fixtures and equipment therein shall be
regularly washed and kept in a sanitary condition.
Every body-rub parlour shall be equipped with an effective utility sink.
Adequate toilet and washroom accommodation shall be provided in
accordance with the regulations set forth under the Ontario Building Code.
Washrooms shall be equipped with,
316
(m)
(n)
(0)
(p)
8
ATTACHMENT #5 TO REPORT CS 14-06
(i)
an adequate supply of hot and cold water;
(ii)
an adequate supply of liquid soap in a suitable container or
dispenser;
(iii)
hot air dryers or individual towels in a suitable container or dispenser;
and
(iv)
a suitable receptacle for used towels and waste material.
(k)
In all shower-bathrooms, if any, and in all sauna-bath rooms, if any,
(i)
the floors shall be disinfected at least once a week with a disinfecting
solution approved by the Medical Officer of Health;
(ii)
all surfaces and attached accessories of the bath or shower
enclosure must be self-draining;
(iii)
all showers must have removable cleanable drain covers; and
(iv)
floor surfaces both within and without the enclosures shall be of non-
slip type.
(I)
Every table, mat or other surface upon which persons lie or sit while being
given or provided with a body-rub shall be clean and in good repair, and
shall have a top surface of impervious material.
Every table mat or other surface referred to in Subsection (I) hereof shall be
covered with a fresh, clean individual paper or cloth sheet before any person
receives a body-rub thereon.
Every sheet or towel shall, immediately after being used by any person, be
deposited in a receptacle reserved for that purpose and shall not be utilized
again for any purpose before being freshly laundered.
Every owner and operator shall provide and maintain at all times at the
body-rub parlour a first-aid kit equipped in a manner satisfactory to the
Medical Officer of Health.
Every body-rub parlour shall be constructed in accordance with the Ontario
Building Code and every applicant for an owner's licence shall provide the
Licensing Officer with such drawings as may be required to assess
compliance in this regard.
HOURS OF OPERATION
JJ.1
9
ATTACHMENT #5 TO REPORT CS 14-06
8.
(i)
No owner or operator may permit a body-rub parlour to be open for
business and no attendant at a body-rub parlour shall provide body-rubs in
a body-rub parlour except between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m.
on any given day, with no provision of service extending past 2:00 a.m.
(ii)
Every owner, operator and attendant shall ensure the hours of operation of
the body-rub parlour are posted on a sign in a conspicuous place, visible
from the outside of the premises.
LOCATIONAL RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATION ON NUMBER
9.
No person may own or operate a body rub parlour from any premises except upon
such lands identified in Schedule "B".
10.
The number of body-rub parlours which may be licensed within the City of Pickering
shall be limited to three (3).
11.
No person may own or operate a body-rub parlour from any premises except upon
such lands as are zoned to permit the use of a body-rub parlour pursuant to City
zoning by-laws.
NATURE OF LICENCE
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
No person shall enjoy a vested right in the continuance of a licence and the value of
a licence shall be the property of the City and shall remain so irrespective of the
issue, renewal or revocation thereof.
No person licensed to carry on any trade, calling, business or occupation pursuant
to this By-law may advertise or promote or carry on such trade, calling, business or
occupation under any name other than the name endorsed upon his licence.
The licences required by this By-law shall, unless they are expressed to be for a
shorter or longer time, be for the period up to and including the 31st day of
December in the year of issuance, unless they are sooner forfeited or revoked.
No licence shall be transferred or assigned and if an owner, operator or attendant
sells, leases or otherwise disposes of his interest in the trade, calling business or
occupation carried on at a body-rub parlour, their licence in respect of such body-
rub parlour or activity shall, notwithstanding any other provision of this By-law, be
revoked.
(i)
Every body-rub parlour licence shall have endorsed thereon the location of a
body-rub parlour and such endorsement shall be for one location only and
such licence shall be valid only for the location endorsed thereon.
Every body-rub parlour owner's, operator's and attendant's licence shall
(ii)
318
10 ATTACHMENT #5 TO REPORT CS 14-06
have endorsed thereon the location of the body-rub parlour which they own
or at which they work and such licence shall be valid only for the locations
endorsed thereon.
(iii)
Where an operator or attendant requires the endorsement of an additional
location after issuance of a licence, the operator or attendant must first
produce a copy of the written contract for services with the owner of the
additional location.
APPLICATION. RENEWAL AND REVOCATION OF LICENCE
17.
(b)
(c)
(d)
Every applicant shall appear in person before a Licensing Officer and shall
complete such licence application forms as may be provided from time to time by
the Licensing Officer in accordance with the requirements of this By-law and shall
provide all information requested thereon, such information to include,
(a)
a Canadian police clearance letter dated within thirty (30) days of the date of
the application;
current valid photo identification, satisfactory to the Licensing Officer;
proof of age, if required to do so, satisfactory to the Licensing Officer that
every person is of the full age of eighteen years; and
pose for identification photograph to be processed and attached to licence
and corresponding files.
In the case of a body-rub parlour owned by a partnership such appearance shall be
made by one of the partners, provided the application shall be signed by all of the
partners and in the case of a body-rub parlour owned by a corporation, such
appearance shall be made by an officer of the corporation and not by an agent thereof.
18.
Every applicant for an,
(a)
(b)
Operator's licence shall provide the Licensing Officer with a written contract
for services between the owner of the body-rub parlour and the applicant
and signed by the licensed owner of the body-rub parlour contained in the
application.
Attendant's licence shall provide the Licensing Officer with a written contract
for services between the owner, or the operator of the body-rub parlour and
the applicant and signed by the licensed owner or licensed operator of the
body-rub parlour contained in the application.
The contract for services shall be dated within 30 days of the date of the
application.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
31H
11
ATTACHMENT #5 TO REPORT CS 14-06
19.
Every applicant for an attendant's licence shall provide the Licensing Officer with a
medical certificate from a qualified doctor dated within thirty (30) days of the date of
the application, indicating that the applicant is free from communicable or
transmissible diseases.
20.
Every applicant for an owner's licence shall, at the time of making an application,
file with the Licensing Officer a list showing the names and addresses and birth
dates of all operators and attendants employed by or performing services in the
body-rub parlour.
At the time of submission of their application, every applicant shall pay to the City
the fee set forth in "Schedule A" of this By-law. Fifty percent of such fee is
refundable in the event that an application is not accepted for licensing.
Receipt of the application andlor the licence fee by the City shall not represent
approval of the application for the issuance of a licence nor shall it obligate the City
to issue such licence.
Without limiting the generality of any other provision in this By-law, persons
associated in a partnership applying for a licence under this By-law shall file with
their application a statutory declaration, in writing, signed by all members of the
partnership, which declaration shall state,
(a)
(b)
the full name of every partner and the address of ordinary residence;
the name or names under which they carry on or intend to carry on
business;
(c)
that the persons therein named are the only members of the partnership;
and
(d)
the mailing address for the partnership.
If any member of a partnership applying for a licence is a corporation, such
corporation shall be deemed to be applying for an owner's or operator's licence as
appropriate in place and stead of the partnership.
Without limiting the generality of any other provision in this By-law, every
corporation applying for a licence shall file with the Licensing Officer, at the time of
making its application, a copy of its articles of incorporation or other incorporating
documents and shall file a statutory declaration, in writing signed by an officer of the
corporation, which declaration shall state,
(a)
(b)
the full name of every shareholder and the address of ordinary residence;
the name or names under which it carries on or intends to carry on
business;
320
26.
27.
(f)
(g)
28.
12 ATTACHMENT #5 TO REPORT CS 14-06
(c)
that the persons therein named are the only shareholders of the
corporation; and
(d)
the mailing address for the corporation.
Within five days of occupying the premises to be licensed as a body rub parlour,
every person applying for a body-rub parlour licence shall file with the Licensing
Officer documentation satisfactory to the Licensing Officer demonstrating the
applicant's right to possess or occupy the premises and if any applicant is not the
registered owner of the property upon which the body-rub parlour is to be located,
such person shall file with the Licensing Officer a copy of their lease, if any, and a
copy of any other document constituting or affecting the legal relationship relating to
the said lands or premises between said applicant and the registered owner.
The Licensing Officer shall,
(a)
receive and process all applications for licences and renewal of licences to
be issued under this By-law;
(b)
(c)
co-ordinate the enforcement of this By-law;
generally perform all the administrative functions conferred upon him or her
by this By law;
(d)
make or cause to be made a circulation respecting each body rub parlour
application, which shall include circulation of the licence application to the
Medical Officer of Health and Durham Regional Police for comments;
(e)
make or cause to be made all investigations and inspections deemed
necessary to determine whether an applicant meets the requirements of this
By-law and all applicable laws;
issue licences to persons who meet the requirements of this By-law and
suspend licences pursuant to the requirements of this By-law; and
where a licence has been issued pursuant to this By-law and otherwise
remains in full force and effect, renew the licences of persons who meet the
requirements of this By-law.
The Licensing Officer shall issue the licence only where,
(a)
(b)
all the information which the applicant is required to provide under this By-
law has been provided, and verified;
all the documents which the applicant is required to provide under this By-
law have been provided;
29.
30.
31.
32.
(e)
(f)
~;?1""
oJ~, ,
13 ATTACHMENT #5 TO REPORT CS 14-06
(c)
the licence fee is paid;
(d)
the premises, accommodations, equipment or facilities in respect of which
the licence is required comply with the provisions of this By-law or any
other applicable law;
the investigations do not disclose that the issuing of such licence may be
adverse to the public interest; and
the Licensing Officer has no grounds to believe the applicant will not
conduct himselflherself in accordance with the law or with honesty and
integrity.
Where the Licensing Officer determines that a licence should not be issued as a
result of any matter in Section 28 of this By-law, helshe shall notify the applicant.
Where an applicant advises the Licensing Officer in writing, that helshe disputes
the determination made by the Licensing Officer under Section 28 of this By-law or
submits that the licence applied for should be issued despite that determination, the
matter shall be referred forthwith by the Licensing Officer to Council, which shall
hear representations from the Licensing Officer and the applicant.
The Licensing Officer may suspend a licence where there is reason to believe that
a breach of this By-law has occurred. Such suspension shall take effect upon
service of a written notice to the licensee and the licence shall remain suspended
for no more than thirty days from the date of service of this notice. In order to
continue this suspension beyond the thirty day period or to revoke the licence, the
Licensing Officer must prepare a report and receive Council's direction in this
regard. Where any licence is suspended, it shall not be reinstated until the
Licensing Officer is able to confirm that the conditions leading to the suspension
have been remedied.
At any meeting of Council called in relation to a report to determine the issuance,
renewal, suspension or revocation of a licence,
(a)
(b)
the applicant,
(i)
shall be accorded its rights pursuant to the Statutory Powers
Procedure Act including the right to appear and speak to the
matter; and
(ii) when he or she has been provided with notice of the meeting
and does not attend, Council may proceed with the meeting in
the absence of the applicant.
Council may,
.,J; It.;., (.,
14 ATTACHMENT #5 TO REPORT CS 14-06
(i)
refuse to grant a licence, revoke a licence or suspend a
licence; or
(ii) impose special conditions as a requirement in order to obtain,
continue to hold or renew a licence.
(c)
Council shall exercise its power under clause 32(b) of this By-law,
(i)
where the applicant has not met the requirements of this By-
law; or
(ii) upon the grounds that the conduct of any person, including the
officers, directors, employees or agents of a corporation,
affords reasonable cause to believe that the person will not
carry on or engage in the business in accordance with the law
or with honesty and integrity.
33.
(1 )
Any licence that has not been renewed as at December 31st in the year of
its issuance or renewal shall expire on January 1 st in the year following its
issuance or renewal.
(2)
Notwithstanding Subsection 33(1), the Licensing Officer may extend a
licence where an application for a renewal of the licence has been made,
and the final disposition of the application remains outstanding by December
31st of the year in which the renewal application was made.
CHANGE OF STATUS
34.
35.
36.
Where there is any change in any of the particulars relating to a person licensed
under this By-law, which particulars are required to be filed with the City on applying
for a licence under this By-law, such person shall report the change to the
Licensing Officer within seven (7) days of the change.
Where there is to be a change in the composition or the controlling interest of a
partnership licensed under this By-law, the persons licensed hereunder in
partnership shall obtain the approval of the Licensing Officer to such change prior
thereto. Where there has been any change in the controlling interest of the
partnership by virtue of a number of transactions, the licence may be suspended
despite the Licensing Officer's prior approval of anyone or more such transactions.
Where there is to be a change in the composition or the controlling interest of the
shareholders of a corporation licensed under this By-law, the corporation shall
obtain the approval of the Licensing Officer to such change prior. Where there has
been any change in the controlling interest of the corporation by virtue of a number
of transactions, the licence may be suspended, despite the Licensing Officer's prior
approval of anyone or more such transactions.
40.
41.
42.
??r:;
tJ.., ~. oJ
15 ATTACHMENT #5 TO REPORT CS 14-06
OFFENCE, PENAL TV AND ENFORCEMENT
37.
Any person who contravenes the provisions of this By-law, including every person
who fails to perform a duty imposed herein or who performs an act prohibited
herein and every director or officer of a corporation who concurs in such a
contravention is guilty of an offence and, upon conviction pursuant to the provisions
of the Provincial Offences Act, is liable to;
(a)
a penalty in the case of persons, other than a corporation, not to exceed
$25,000.00 or imprisonment for a term not to exceed one year or both;
(b)
(c)
a penalty in the case of a corporation, not to exceed $50,000.00; and
an order closing the body-rub parlour, which is the subject of the
contravention, for a period not to exceed two years.
38.
The making of a false or intentionally misleading recital of fact, statement or
representation in any agreement, statutory declaration or application form
required by this By-law shall be deemed to be a violation of the provisions of this
By-law.
39.
Every person shall comply with the provisions of this By-law applicable to himlher
whether or not helshe is licensed under this By-law.
Every owner, operator and attendant shall, during the operating hours of the
body-rub parlour and at all times when body-rubs are provided therein, make
available for inspection by the Licensing Officer, a peace officer, a Medical
Officer of Health, a Provincial Offences Officer, or a municipal law enforcement
officer the original of any document or record or licence referred to in this By-law.
Every owner and every operator of a body-rub parlour shall, at all times during
the hours of operation of the body-rub parlour and during all hours when body-
rubs are being provided at the body-rub parlour, permit the entry by and the
inspection of the body-rub parlour by a municipal law enforcement officer, a
Provincial Offences Officer, the Licensing Officer, a Medical Officer of Health or a
Peace Officer.
No person may obstruct or hinder the entry or the inspection of a body-rub
parlour by a municipal law enforcement officer, a Provincial Offences Officer, the
Licensing Officer, a Medical Officer of Health or a Peace Officer.
VALIDITY
43.
Should any section of this By-law be declared invalid by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such section shall be construed as being severed herefrom and the
remainder of the By-law shall continue in full force and effect.
1I}...2.';::
;";1 lj.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
16 ATTACHMENT #5 TO REPORT CS 14-06
All Schedules referred to in this By-law are deemed to be part of this By-law.
Wherever notice or materials are required to be provided to any person pursuant
to this By-law, such notice shall be deemed effective two (2) days after mailing of
the materials by registered mail to the last address of that person as indicated
upon the licence application or upon other material filed with the City.
The provisions of this By-law are not applicable in relation to medical or
therapeutic treatment given by a person otherwise duly qualified, licensed or
registered to do so under the laws of the Province of Ontario.
This By-law shall be known as the Body-Rub Parlour By-law.
By-law 5764/00, "A By-law respecting the licensing and regulating of body-rub
parlours and attendants" shall be repealed effective March 6, 2006.
This By-law shall come into force on March 6, 2006 and remain in force until
December 31,2010.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 6th day of March, 2006.
David Ryan, Mayor
Debi A. Bentley, Clerk
325
17 ATTACHMENT #5 TO REPORT CS 14-06
SCHEDULE "A"
TO BY-LAW NUMBER xxx
Body-Rub Parlour Licence Fees:
Owner/Operator:
$500.00
$250.00
Owner who does not operate:
Operator other than Owner:
$250.00
$150.00
Attendant
F or the term of any licence period expiring December 31 sl of any year.
3,26
18 ATTACHMENT #5 TO REPORT CS 14-06
SCHEDULE "B"
TO BY-LAW NUMBER xxx
DEFINED AREAS WHERE A BODY RUB PARLOUR MAY OPERATE
SCHEDULE 'B'
DEFINED AREAS WHERE A BODY RUB PARLOUR MAY OPERATE
--
......0 .~UT
,-,
" ~,-il
~ ~,i:
ro,
",ù
r-UOhh_---
I
I
P'CK<A'NC OENEAATONQ STAnON
LAKE ONTARIO
í'
Ciú¡ 0#
¡ATTACHMENT #~¡1-CJb
I)f)~
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE oJ ~ I
Report Number: CS 02-06
Date: January 9, 2006
From:
Oebi Bentley
City Clerk
Subject:
Draft Body Rub Parlour By-law
File: L-2314
Recommendation:
1.
That Report CS 02-06 regarding a proposed Body Rub Parlour By-law be
received;
2.
That the attached draft by-law be enacted to provide for the licensing and
regulation of Body Rub Parlours within the City of Pickering, and
3.
That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be given the authority to
give effect thereto.
Executive Summary:
Under the requirements of the Municipal Act 2001, all municipal regulatory by-laws are
subject to review after a five year period. In accordance with this requirement, Body
Rub Parlour By-law 5764/00 has been examined and a new by-law prepared which
addresses areas where specific controls or regulations were previously not in place. It
also incorporates specific provisions for suspending and revoking licenses.
These changes are proposed to improve the safety of the attendants and the public, as
well as limit the opportunity for the provision of illegal services.
Financial Implications:
The licensing fees proposed have been amended to maintain a consistent set of fees,
instead of a large fee for a first licence and then a relatively minimal fee for renewals.
Licensing fees are outlined on Schedule "A" of the proposed by-law.
328
Report CS 02-06
Subject: Draft Body Rub Parlour By-law
Page 2
Background:
Body Rub Parlour By-law 5764/00 was the City's first by-law regulating and licensing
Body Rub Parlours. After utilizing the by-law for the past five years, and consulting the
by-laws in place in other municipalities, the introduction of a number of specific
regulatory requirements is recommended.
The Body Rub Parlour by-law is an important tool in regulating the operation of Body
Rub Parlours within the City of Pickering. It provides the ability to restrict locations, the
number of licenses issued, the hours of operation, the design of premises, and the
conduct and apparel of the staff. It also allows the maintenance of accurate records of
ownership and operation to encourage compliance with by-law requirements or assist in
legal action where contraventions of the by-law occur.
With the assistance of Durham Regional Police Service, the City of Pickering has been
very successful in regulating the Body Rub Parlour industry and preventing the
operation of unlicensed Body Rub Parlours.
The proposed by-law further enhances the City's ability to ensure the services provided
are legally permitted.
Attachments:
1.
Draft Body Rub Parlour By-law
Prepared By:
~
Manager, By-law Enforcement SeNices
Approved I Endorsed By:
---.
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
, ,.-- '.
C --(. .'^-.
L ~, Gillis Paterson,
V~X;; Director, Corporate Services & Trè urer
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering Ci y Council
. .."
\
Ii
I
,r--'--'--~~"..~
CORPO227-07/01
"-"- - '..
Ii); 1:)., Q
v.,r:;..V
I ATTACHMENT # . 6 m REPœI'I. 1:f-~ . .
BODY RUB PARLOUR BY-LAW
WHEREAS Sections 150 and 151 of the Municipal Act, 2001 authorize Council to pass by-
laws that license, regulate and govern adult entertainment establishments;
AND WHEREAS Council has determined that the location of body rub parlours must be
regulated to ensure that the use is compatible with the neighbourhood and their location or
number does not create a nuisance;
AND WHEREAS Council has determined that licensing owners, operators and attendants
of body rub parlours protects consumers and contributes to their health and safety by
regulating access, cleanliness, and prohibiting illegal services;
AND WHEREAS to enhance professionalism and to help prevent illegal services from
being offered or obtained, while still allowing legitimate services to be provided, Council
has deemed that certain standards of dress must be maintained and specified areas of the
body may not be exposed or touched;
AND WHEREAS Council has determined that consumers should be protected from
unknowingly entering a bawdy-house when seeking a massage at a body rub parlour;
AND WHEREAS Council has determined that certain restrictions on behaviour of both
patrons and attendants reduces transmission of disease that would have an adverse effect
on the health of both the patrons and attendants;
AND WHEREAS Council has determined that free and unobstructed access to rooms in
body rub parlours contributes to the safety of both attendants and patrons therein;
AND WHEREAS Council has determined that licensing owners and operators of body rub
parlours protects consumers as there is a record of licence holders and the ability to
require legal and honest operation of such businesses and to hold licensees responsible
when the business is not conducted in accordance with the law or with integrity;
AND WHEREAS Council has determined that the ability to add conditions to, suspend,
revoke or refuse licences encourages owners and operators of body rub parlours to
comply with the by-law requirements;
':') 3- ,. O.J'
oJ .,
2
TQ!:~EJ'°R!,~ C 5 I tg
I ATTACHMENT # b
AND WHEREAS Council has determined that the ability to enforce the provisions of this
By-law through charges under this By-law also encourages owners and operators of body
rub parlours to comply with the by-law requirements;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering ENACTS AS
FOLLOWS:
DEFINITIONS
1.
In this By-law,
"adult entertainment service" means any service appealing to or designed
to appeal to erotic or sexual appetites or inclinations, any other service
involving sexual touching; any other service offered, performed, provided, or
received with the purposes or effect of sexual arousal or stimulation; and any
service directly or indirectly advertised or described as involving any of such
services;
"attendant" means a person who, in pursuance of a trade, business or
occupation, provides body-rubs at a body-rub parlour;
"body-rub" includes the kneading, manipulating, rubbing, massaging,
touching or stimulating by any means of a person's body or part thereof, but
does not include medical or therapeutic treatment given by a person
otherwise duly qualified, licensed or registered to do so under the laws of the
Province of Ontario;
"body-rub parlour" is included in the definition of 'adult entertainment
parlour' in the Municipal Act, 2001 and includes any premises or part thereof
where a body-rub is performed, offered or solicited in pursuance of a trade,
calling, business, or occupation, but does not include any premises or part
thereof where the body-rubs performed are for the purpose of medical or
therapeutic treatment and are performed or offered by persons otherwise
duly qualified, licensed or registered so to do under the laws of the Province
of Ontario;
"City" means The Corporation of the City of Pickering;
"Council" means the Council of the City;
"licence" means an authorization under this By-law to carry on the trade,
calling, business or occupation specified therein;
"Licensing Officer" means a person appointed by the City to issue
licences;
"Medical Officer of Health" means the Medical Officer of Health for The
11)31
..)J ~.J!.
3
, ATTACHMENT #
h TO REPORT # cs Iff
Regional Municipality of Durham;
"operator" includes a person who, alone or with others, operates, manages,
supeNises, runs or directs the trade, calling, business or occupation carried
on at a body-rub parlour;
"owner" includes a person who, alone or with others, owns or controls the
trade, calling, business or occupation carried on at a body-rub parlour or
who directs the activities of an operator and includes a person who is the
tenant or licensee in respect of premises which are utilized as a body-rub
parlour;
"provide" when used in relation to body-rubs includes offering to provide
or causing or permitting the provision of a body-rub and "provides",
"providing" and "provision" have corresponding meanings; and
"sign" includes any sign as defined pursuant to the City's By-law, as
amended.
GENERAL REGULATIONS
2.
No person may be an owner of a body-rub parlour without making application for,
obtaining and maintaining, pursuant to the terms of this By-law, a body-rub
parlour licence.
3.
No person may be an operator of a body-rub parlour without making application
for, obtaining and maintaining, pursuant to the terms of this By-law, a body-rub
parlour operator's licence.
4.
No person may be an attendant in a body-rub parlour without making application
for, obtaining and maintaining, pursuant to the terms of this By-law, an
attendant's licence.
5.
No person may be an owner or operator of a body-rub parlour or be an attendant or
provide any body-rub in a body-rub parlour except in compliance with the following
regulations:
(a)
No person may provide body-rubs in a body-rub parlour to any person
under the age of eighteen years and no person under the age of eighteen
years may be allowed to enter or remain in any part of a body-rub parlour.
(b)
Each owner or operator shall ensure that there is posted in a prominent
location at the entrance to the body-rub parlour a sign indicating that no
person under the age of eighteen years may enter or remain in such
premises.
Ii')', '), ":'
...).1 .J... /..,.
(I)
(m)
(n)
4
I ATTACHMENT #
h TO REPORT #- ~9~-t
(c)
No owner or operator may permit any employee or person under contract
to work at a body-rub parlour unless such person is at least 18 years of
age and such person has been instructed with regard to the regulations of
this By-law and complies with these regulations.
(d)
No owner or operator may permit a body-rub parlour to be open for business
unless the owner or operator is in attendance in person.
(e)
With the exception of patent medicines and prescription drugs required for
medicinal purposes, no person may take, consume or have alcohol or
drugs in their possession in a body-rub parlour.
(f)
No owner or operator may permit any person who appears to be
intoxicated by alcohol or a drug to enter or remain in a body-rub parlour.
(g)
No person may advertise or promote a body-rub parlour or the provision of
body-rubs at a body-rub parlour except in accordance with the provisions
of this By-law respecting "Signs and Advertisements".
(h)
No owner or operator may permit a body-rub parlour to open or to remain
open for business except in compliance with the provisions of this By-law
respecting "Hours of Operation".
(i)
No person may own or operate a body-rub parlour except in compliance
with the provisions of this By-law respecting "Locational Restrictions and
Limitations on Number".
(j)
No person may own or operate a body-rub parlour except in compliance
with the provision of this By-law respecting "Design of Premises".
(k)
Every owner and operator shall keep their licence certificate issued in
respect of a body-rub parlour posted in a conspicuous place in the said
premises in a manner satisfactory to the Licensing Officer at all times
during the currency of the licence.
No owner or operator may permit any attendant to provide body-rubs at a
body-rub parlour unless such attendant is licensed pursuant to the
provisions of this By-law and their licence has not expired, been revoked
or suspended.
No attendant may provide a body-rub at a body-rub parlour unless there is
in attendance at the premises a licensed body-rub parlour owner or
operator who does not provide body-rubs.
An owner shall enter into a written contract for services between every
operator and every attendant at a body-rub parlour and such contracts shall
be made available to a Licensing Officer upon request for inspection at any
(t)
(u)
(v)
5
I ATTACHMENT #
J3~.
t;, TO REPOR! # CS/4tOb
time during business hours of the body-rub parlour and during all times
when body-rubs are provided, and shall be retained by an owner or operator
for a period of six months after the termination or completion of such
contract.
(0)
Every attendant at a body rub parlour shall be clothed in a manner such that
each such person's pubic and genital area, and in the case of a woman, her
breasts are fully covered by opaque material.
(p)
No person may provide or receive any adult entertainment services or any
services designed to appeal to erotic or sexual appetites in a body-rub
parlour.
(q)
No owner or operator may use or permit to be used any camera or other
photographic or recording device at a body-rub parlour by any person.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a public health inspector acting under the
direction of the Medical Officer of Health, the Licensing Officer, a peace
officer or a Municipal Law Enforcement Officer may use a camera or other
photographic or recording device at a body-rub parlour during the course of
an inspection or investigation thereof. In addition, an owner or an operator
may maintain a photographic device in the entrance lobby of the premises
for security purposes.
(r)
Every owner shall post and maintain in the lobby or entrance of the body rub
parlour, in a manner that is satisfactory to the Licensing Officer, a sign which
provides as follows: "This premise is licensed as a body rub parlour by the
City of Pickering. The By-law regulating this premise makes it an offence for
any person to provide services in a body-rub parlour that are designed to
appeal to erotic or sexual appetites."
(s)
No attendant shall provide or offer to provide services to any person
unless such person's pubic and genital area, and buttocks and, in the
case of a woman, her breasts, are completely and opaquely covered.
No owner or operator shall permit any attendant to provide or offer to
provide services to any person unless such person's pubic and genital
area, and buttocks and, in the case of a woman, her breasts, are
completely and opaquely covered.
Every body-rub parlour owner and operator shall ensure that no services
are provided at the body-rub parlour other than in accordance with the
requirements of this By-law.
No person shall provide services in a body-rub parlour unless the owner of
the body-rub parlour holds a body-rub parlour licence, which has not
expired, been revoked or suspended.
1!"\'3' ~
:,';' ',' I,i,
oJi , -'):
6
I ATTACHMENT It b
TO REPOR! #~~jLf-¿
(w)
No person shall be an operator of a body-rub parlour unless the owner of
the body-rub parlour holds a body-rub parlour licence, which has not
expired, been revoked or suspended.
(x)
Every attendant shall ensure the window provided to permit the
observation of body-rubs by third parties remains unobstructed.
(y)
No person, while acting as an owner or operator, shall perform any body-rub
services.
SIGNS AND ADVERTISEMENTS
6.
(b)
(c)
(d)
No person may erect or maintain any sign advertising a body-rub parlour or the
body-rubs provided from such premises except in accordance with City by-laws,
including the City Sign By-law, as amended. Notwithstanding the provisions of
the City Sign By-law, as amended, no person may erect or maintain any sign
advertising a body-rub parlour except in accordance with the following additional
regulations:
(a)
No person may erect or maintain any of the following signs in respect of a
body-rub parlour or in respect of any body-rubs provided from such
premises:
- awning sign
- projecting sign
- portable sign
- ground or pylon sign,
- canopy sign
- inflatable sign
- trailer sign
- sandwich board sign
No person may circulate, post, distribute or cause to be circulated, posted,
or distributed any poster, flyer, handbill or other form of printed sign on
premises or locations other than the body-rub parlour, with the exception
of advertising located in a newspaper or in the Yellow Pages.
Nothing within this By-law shall be deemed to constrain any person from
erecting or maintaining any sign or advertising on any interior wall of a
body-rub parlour, provided the content of such sign is not visible from the
exterior of the body-rub parlour.
No person may erect or maintain any sign or advertising in respect of a
body-rub parlour which includes any letters, markings, symbols, pictures
or representations except the name of the body-rub parlour as recorded
on the application for licence and any registered copyright logo or symbol,
provided a copy of such logo or symbol is filed with the Licensing Officer
as part of the licensing process.
7
335
l ATTACHMENT # iroRËPORT # C 5 ¡'I-f'
DESIGN OF PREMISES
7.
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
No person may be an owner or operator of a body-rub parlour except in
accordance with the following regulations:
(a)
The owner or operator shall provide the Licensing Officer with a floor plan
showing the designated room or rooms for the provision of body-rubs and
no person may provide body-rubs in any other room, cubicle, enclosure or
partitioned area located within the body-rub parlour. In the event that the
owner or operator wishes to amend the floor plan, he shall first file with the
Licensing Officer a copy of the amended floor plan and shall not proceed
to make such alterations without first obtaining the approval of the
Licensing Office.
(b)
Save and except for one room designated by the owner or operator for
use as an office and one room designated by the owner or operator as a
storage room, every owner or operator shall ensure that no means of
access to any room, cubicle, enclosure or partitioned area in a body-rub
parlour is equipped or constructed with a locking device of any kind or with
any other device or structure which could delay or hinder anyone from
entering or obtaining access to such area.
(c)
During the hours of operation of a body-rub parlour the owner, operator
and attendant shall ensure that the principal means of access into the
body-rub parlour is unlocked and available so that anyone coming into the
body-rub parlour may enter therein without hindrance or delay.
No premises or part thereof used as a body-rub parlour shall be used as a
dwelling or for sleeping purposes or contain therein any furniture which is
commonly used or which may be used for sleeping purposes.
Every massage room shall be equipped with a window to permit observation
of the provision of body rubs by third parties. The window must be 8 cm
wide x 13 cm tall clear glass, located in the door to each massage room at a
height of not less than 1.5 m and not greater than 1.7 m and must not be
obstructed in any way.
Every body-rub parlour shall be provided with adequate ventilation and with
lighting that is adequate to ensure visibility and that is uniformly distributed
throughout the premises.
Every body-rub parlour and all fixtures and equipment therein shall be
regularly washed and kept in a sanitary condition.
Every body-rub parlour shall be equipped with an effective utility sink.
t')) 3' 6
Vi' '
(m)
(n)
(0)
(p)
8
--
ATTACHMENT # h TO REPORT # C ~ jt¡.,ù{;
(i)
Adequate toilet and washroom accommodation shall be provided in
accordance with the regulations set forth under the Ontario Building Code.
U)
Washrooms shall be equipped with,
(i)
(ii)
an adequate supply of hot and cold water;
an adequate supply of liquid soap in a suitable container or
dispenser;
(iii)
hot air dryers or individual towels in a suitable container or dispenser;
and
(iv)
a suitable receptacle for used towels and waste material.
(k)
In all shower-bathrooms, if any, and in all sauna-bath ròoms, if any,
(i)
the floors shall be disinfected at least once a week with a disinfecting
solution approved by the Medical Officer of Health;
(ii)
all surfaces and attached accessories of the bath or shower
enclosure must be self-draining;
(iii)
all showers must have removable cleanable drain covers; and
(iv)
floor surfaces both within and without the enclosures shall be of non-
slip type.
(I)
Every table, mat or other surface upon which persons lie or sit while being
given or provided with a body-rub shall be clean and in good repair, and
shall have a top surface of impervious material.
Every table mat or other surface referred to in Subsection (I) hereof shall be
covered with a fresh, clean individual paper or cloth sheet before any person
receives a body-rub thereon.
Every sheet or towel shall, immediately after being used by any person, be
deposited in a receptacle reserved for that purpose and shall not be utilized
again for any purpose before being freshly laundered.
Every owner and operator shall provide and maintain at all times at the
body-rub parlour a first-aid kit equipped in a manner satisfactory to the
Medical Officer of Health.
Every body-rub parlour shall be constructed in accordance with the Ontario
Building Code and every applicant for an owner's licence shall provide the
'-
337
9 'ATTACHMENT # b TO REPORT #C5/If[o"
Licensing Officer with such drawings as may be required to assess
compliance in this regard.
HOURS OF OPERATION
8.
(i)
No owner or operator may permit a body-rub parlour to be open for
business and no attendant at a body-rub parlour shall provide body-rubs in
a body-rub parlour except between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.
on any given day.
(ii)
Every owner, operator and attendant shall ensure the hours of operation of
the body-rub parlour are posted on a sign in a conspicuous place, visible
from the outside of the premises.
LOCA TIONAL RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATION ON NUMBER
9.
No person may own or operate a body rub parlour from any premises except upon
such lands identified in Schedule "B".
10.
The number of body-rub parlours which may be licensed within the City of Pickering
shall be limited to three (3).
11.
No person may own or operate a body-rub parlour from any premises except upon
such lands as are zoned to permit the use of a body-rub parlour pursuant to City
zoning by-laws.
NATURE OF LICENCE
12.
13.
14.
15.
No person shall enjoy a vested right in the continuance of a licence and the value of
a licence shall be the property of the City and shall remain so irrespective of the
issue, renewal or revocation thereof.
No person licensed to carry on any trade, calling, business or occupation pursuant
to this By-law may advertise or promote or carry on such trade, calling, business or
occupation under any name other than the name endorsed upon his licence.
The licences required by this By-law shall, unless they are expressed to be for a
shorter or longer time, be for the period up to and including the 31st day of
December in the year of issuance, unless they are sooner forfeited or revoked.
No licence shall be transferred or assigned and if an owner, operator or attendant
sells, leases or otherwise disposes of his interest in the trade, calling business or
occupation carried on at a body-rub parlour, their licence in respect of such body-
rub parlour or activity shall, notwithstanding any other provision of this By-law, be
revoked.
t,{.ð..~...ç.!
v.'~.O
16.
10
'ATTACHMENT #-L TO"ÃEP(JRT #-~1-0L
(i)
Every body-rub parlour licence shall have endorsed thereon the location of a
body-rub parlour and such endorsement shall be for one location only and
such licence shall be valid only for the location endorsed thereon.
(ii)
Every body-rub parlour owner's, operator's and attendant's licence shall
have endorsed thereon the location of the body-rub parlour which they own
or at which they work and such licence shall be valid only for the locations
endorsed thereon.
(iii)
Where an operator or attendant requires the endorsement of an additional
location after issuance of a licence, the operator or attendant must first
produce a copy of the written contract for services with the owner of the
additional location.
APPLICATION, RENEWAL AND REVOCATION OF LICENCE
17.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Every applicant shall appear in person before a Licensing Officer and shall
complete such licence application forms as may be provided from time to time by
the Licensing Officer in accordance with the requirements of this By-law and shall
provide all information requested thereon, such information to include,
a Canadian police clearance Jetter dated within thirty (30) days of the date of
the application;
current valid photo identification, satisfactory to the Licensing Officer;
proof of age, if required to do so, satisfactory to the Licensing Officer that
every person is of the full age of eighteen years; and
pose for identification photograph to be processed and attached to licence
and corresponding files.
In the case of a body-rub parlour owned by a partnership such appearance shall be
made by one of the partners, provided the application shall be signed by all of the
partners and in the case of a body-rub parlour owned by a corporation, such
appearance shall be made by an officer of the corporation and not by an agent thereof.
18.
Every applicant for an,
(a)
(b)
Operator's licence shall provide the Licensing Officer with a written contract
for services between the owner of the body-rub parlour and the applicant
and signed by the licensed owner of the body-rub parlour contained in the
application.
Attendant's licence shall provide the Licensing Officer with a written contract
for services between the owner, or the operator of the body-rub parlour and
23.
24.
25.
3:3:pj
] I ATTACHMENT tLJ. ~P/]RTJ!. CS J -Df
the applicant and signed by the licensed owner or licensed operator of the
body-rub parlour contained in the application.
The contract for services shall be dated within 30 days of the date of the
application.
19.
Every applicant for an attendant's licence shall provide the Licensing Officer with a
medical certificate from a qualified doctor dated within thirty (30) days of the date of
the application, indicating that the applicant is free from communicable or
transmissible diseases.
20.
Every applicant for an owner's licence shall, at the time of making an application,
file with the Licensing Officer a list showing the names and addresses and birth
dates of all operators and attendants employed by or performing services in the
body-rub parlour.
21.
At the time of submission of their application, every applicant shall pay to the City
the fee set forth in "Schedule A" of this By-law. Fifty percent of such fee is
refundable in the event that an application is not accepted for licensing.
22.
Receipt of the application andlor the licence fee by the City shall not represent
approval of the application for the issuance of a licence nor shall it obligate the City
to issue such licence.
Without limiting the generality of any other provision in this By-law, persons
associated in a partnership applying for a licence under this By-law shall file with
their application a statutory declaration, in writing, signed by all members of the
partnership, which declaration shall state,
(a)
(b)
the full name of every partner and the address of ordinary residence;
the name or names under which they carry on or intend to carryon
business;
(c)
that the persons therein named are the only members of the partnership;
and
(d)
the mailing address for the partnership.
If any member of a partnership applying for a licence is a corporation, such
corporation shall be deemed to be applying for an owner's or operator's licence as
appropriate in place and stead of the partnership.
Without limiting the generality of any other provision in this By-law, every
corporation applying for a licence shall file with the Licensing Officer, at the time of
making its application, a copy of its articles of incorporation or other incorporating
'1 ~ ('t
,j 'I- ¡-
26.
27.
12
ATTACHMENT # -1L TO RÈPÔRT ~ ¡~ SIr - v b
documents and shall file a statutory declaration, in writing signed by an 0 Icer 0
corporation, which declaration shall state,
(a)
(b)
the full name of every shareholder and the address of ordinary residence;
the name or names under which it carries on or intends to carry on
business;
(c)
that the persons therein named are the only shareholders of the
corporation; and
(d)
the mailing address for the corporation.
Every person applying for a body-rub parlour licence shall file with the Licensing
Officer documentation satisfactory to the Licensing Officer demonstrating the
applicant's right to possess or occupy the premises and if any applicant is not the
registered owner of the property upon which the body-rub parlour is to be located,
such person shall file with the Licensing Officer a copy of their lease, if any, and a
copy of any other document constituting or affecting the legal relationship relating to
the said lands or premises between said applicant and the registered owner.
The Licensing Officer shall,
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
receive and process all applications for licences and renewal of licences to
be issued under this By-law;
co-ordinate the enforcement of this By-law;
generally perform all the administrative functions conferred upon him or her
by this By law;
make or cause to be made a circulation respecting each body rub parlour
application, which shall include circulation of the licence application to the
Medical Officer of Health and Durham Regional Police for comments;
make or cause to be made all investigations and inspections deemed
necessary to determine whether an applicant meets the requirements of this
By-law and all applicable laws;
issue licences to persons who meet the requirements of this By-law and
suspend licences pursuant to the requirements of this By-law; and
where a licence has been issued pursuant to this By-law and otherwise
remains in full force and effect, renew the licences of persons who meet the
requirements of this By-law.
29.
30.
31.
32.
28.
(e)
(f)
13
9'.)t .\
~; '1:.1
I ATTACHMENT 11 -1L TO REPOR~ # C5 i~-Of
The Licensing Officer shall issue the licence only where,
(a)
all the information which the applicant is required to provide under this By-
law has been provided, and verified;
(b)
all the documents which the applicant is required to provide under this By-
law have been provided;
(c)
the licence fee is paid;
(d)
the premises, accommodations, equipment or facilities in respect of which
the licence is required comply with the provisions of this By-law or any
other applicable law;
the investigations do not disclose that the issuing of such licence may be
adverse to the public interest; and
the Licensing Officer has no grounds to believe the applicant will not
conduct himself/herself in accordance with the law or with honesty and
integrity.
Where the Licensing Officer determines that a licence should not be issued as a
result of any matter in Section 28 of this By-law, helshe shall notify the applicant.
Where an applicant advises the Licensing Officer in writing, that helshe disputes
the determination made by the Licensing Officer under Section 28 of this By-law or
submits that the licence applied for should be issued despite that determination, the
matter shall be referred forthwith by the Licensing Officer to Council, which shall
hear representations from the Licensing Officer and the applicant.
The Licensing Officer may suspend a licence where there is reason to believe that
a breach of this By-law has occurred. Such suspension shall take effect upon
service of a written notice to the licensee and the licence shall remain suspended
for no more than thirty days from the date of service of this notice. In order to
continue this suspension beyond the thirty day period or to revoke the licence, the
Licensing Officer must prepare a report and receive Council's direction in this
regard. Where any licence is suspended, it shall not be reinstated until the
Licensing Officer is able to confirm that the conditions leading to the suspension
have been remedied.
At any meeting of Council called in relation to a report to determine the issuance,
renewal, suspension or revocation of a licence,
(a)
the applicant,
(i)
shall be accorded its rights pursuant to the Statutory Powers
Procedure Act including the right to appear and speak to the
~'A¡I)
-J: 'i I:'"
14
[A1ÏÄCHMENT It '¡ 'ÏORÊPõÃÌ #~-Ot
matter; and
(ii)
when he or she has been provided with notice of the meeting
and does not attend, Council may proceed with the meeting in
the absence of the applicant.
(b)
Council may,
(i) refuse to grant a licence, revoke a licence or suspend a
licence; or
(ii) impose special conditions as a requirement in order to obtain,
continue to hold or renew a licence.
(c)
Council shall exercise its power under clause 32(b) of this By-law,
(i)
where the applicant has not met the requirements of this By-
law; or
(ii) upon the grounds that the conduct of any person, including the
officers, directors, employees or agents of a corporation,
affords reasonable cause to believe that the person will not
carry on or engage in the business in accordance with the law
or with honesty and integrity.
33.
(1 )
Any licence that has not been renewed as at December 31 st in the year of
its issuance or renewal shall expire on January 1 st in the year following its
issuance or renewal.
(2)
Notwithstanding Subsection 33(1), the Licensing Officer may extend a
licence where an application for a renewal of the licence has been made,
and the final disposition of the application remains outstanding by December
31st of the year in which the renewal application was made.
CHANGE OF STATUS
34.
Where there is any change in any of the particulars relating to a person licensed
under this By-law, which particulars are required to be filed with the City on applying
for a licence under this By-law, such person shall report the change to the
Licensing Officer within seven (7) days of the change.
35.
Where there is to be a change in the composition or the controlling interest of a
partnership licensed under this By-law, the persons licensed hereunder in
partnership shall obtain the approval of the Licensing Officer to such change prior
thereto. Where there has been any change in the controlling interest of the
partnership by virtue of a number of transactions, the licence may be suspended
despite the Licensing Officer's prior approval of anyone or more such transactions.
36.
15
ATTACHMENT # ~..l9~.~ c 31 -Ot
~41")J
.~." '. ")
..J; ,.
Where there is to be a change in the composition or the controlling interest of the
shareholders of a corporation licensed under this By-law, the corporation shall
obtain the approval of the Licensing Officer to such change prior. Where there has
been any change in the controlling interest of the corporation by virtue of a number
of transactions, the licence may be suspended, despite the Licensing Officer's prior
approval of anyone or more such transactions.
OFFENCE. PENALTY AND ENFORCEMENT
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
Any person who contravenes the provisions of this By-law, including every person
who fails to perform a duty imposed herein or who performs an act prohibited
herein and every director or officer of a corporation who concurs in such a
contravention is guilty of an offence and, upon conviction pursuant to the provisions
of the Provincial Offences Act, is liable to;
(a)
a penalty in the case of persons, other than a corporation, not to exceed
$25,000.00 or imprisonment for a term not to exceed one year or both;
(b)
(c)
a penalty in the case of a corporation, not to exceed $50,000.00; and
an order closing the body-rub parlour, which is the subject of the
contravention, for a period not to exceed two years.
The making of a false or intentionally misleading recital of fact, statement or
representation in any agreement, statutory declaration or application form
required by this By-law shall be deemed to be a violation of the provisions of this
By-law.
Every person shall comply with the provisions of this By-law applicable to him/her
whether or not helshe is licensed under this By-law.
Every owner, operator and attendant shall, during the operating hours of the
body-rub parlour and at all times when body-rubs are provided therein, make
available for inspection by the Licensing Officer, a peace officer, a Medical
Officer of Health, a Provincial Offences Officer, or a municipal law enforcement
officer the original of any document or record or licence referred to in this By-law.
Every owner and every operator of a body-rub parlour shall, at all times during
the hours of operation of the body-rub parlour and during all hours when body-
rubs are being provided at the body-rub parlour, permit the entry by and the
inspection of the body-rub parlour by a municipal law enforcement officer, a
Provincial Offences Officer, the Licensing Officer, a Medical Officer of Health or a
Peace Officer.
No person may obstruct or hinder the entry or the inspection of a body-rub
parlour by a municipal law enforcement officer, a Provincial Offences Officer, the
Licensing Officer, a Medical Officer of Health or a Peace Officer.
1)4 ¡AI¡
-.) t
46.
47.
48.
49.
16
I ATTACHMEÑT;b IURÈpôÃT; c~j -bi
VALIDITY
43.
Should any section of this By-law be declared invalid by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such section shall be construed as being severed herefrom and the
remainder of the By-law shall continue in full force and effect.
44.
All Schedules referred to in this By-law are deemed to be part of this By-law.
45.
Wherever notice or materials are required to be provided to any person pursuant
to this By-law, such notice shall be deemed effective two (2) days after mailing of
the materials by registered mail to the last address of that person as indicated
upon the licence application or upon other material filed with the City.
The provisions of this By-law are not applicable in relation to medical or
therapeutic treatment given by a person otherwise duly qualified, licensed or
registered to do so under the laws of the Province of Ontario.
This By-law shall be known as the Body-Rub Parlour By-law.
By-law 5764/00, lOA By-law respecting the licensing and regulating of body-rub
parlours and attendants" shall be repealed effective January 16, 2006.
This By-law shall come into force on January 16, 2006 and remain in force until
December 31, 2010.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 16th day of January,
2006.
David Ryan, Mayor
Oebi A. Bentley, Clerk
'=>'.' A.' ~."¡.
ffJi "f: t;.I
17
'ATTACHMENT #-.L TÕ"'ÃËPORT #(51411
SCHEDULE "A"
TO BY-LAW NUMBER xxx
Body-Rub Parlour Licence Fees:
Owner/Operator:
$500.00
$250.00
Owner who does not operate:
Operator other than Owner:
$250.00
$150.00
Attendant
For the term of any licence period expiring December 31st of any year.
J:. 4: o¡
18
SCHEDULE "B"
ATTACHMENT #
TO BY-LAW NUMBER xxx
h TO REPORT # C 5 III a:
SCHEDULE 'B'
DEFINED AREAS WHERE A BODY RUB PARLOUR MAY OPERATE
DEFINED AREAS WHERE A BODY RUB PARLOUR MAY OPERATE
,
rm__._n__-'
~
"ccsr.. I ~ ~
w=,"cß'oorn
¡ §
I
~
'---
s
~
'o.c
eONT'OC P~T
WONTCCwC"
TO"-CV""W
"'C.£"'NG G£N£"^ToNO ST^ToON
r, ftJ
Œ[Q)
~
O"'C
=>
l'"
tee)
~
~ ",COCONe
i C"VE
LAKE ONTARIO
-J'
IV