HomeMy WebLinkAboutJune 9, 2003Committee of the Whole Meeting
Agenda
Monday, June 9, 2003
Chair: Councillor Johnson
ADOPTION OF MINUTES
Meeting of May 12, 2003
(11)
1.
MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION
OPERATIONS & EMERGENCY SERVICES REPORT 23-03
TENDER T-1-2003 - TENDER FOR ROSEBANK ROAD BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT AND ROAD RECONSTRUCTION
PAGE
1-10
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE REPORT CAO 05-03
FEDERAL LANDS IN PICKERING, MARKHAM AND UXBRIDGE
IMPLEMENTATION OF FEDERAL AIRPORT
ZONING REGULATIONS
11-19
CLERK'S REPORT CL 16-03
APPOINTMENT OF BY-LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS
20-24
CLERK'S REPORT CL 14-03
APPOINTMENT OF BY-LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS
25-29
(111) OTHER BUSINESS
(IV) ADJOURNMENT
RECOMMENDATION OF THE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
DATE
MOVED BY
SECONDED BY
That Report OES 23-03 regarding the Rosebank Road Bridge Replacement and
Road Reconstruction, be received; and
That Tender No. T-1-2003 submitted by Dagmar Construction Inc. for the
Rosebank Road Bridge Replacement and Road Reconstruction in the amount of
$698,330 (7% GST extra), for a total of $747,213 and a net cost after G.S.T.
rebate of $719,282, be accepted; and
That the total project cost of $794,293 including the tender amount, other
associated project costs, and a total net project cost of $764,602, be approved;
and
That Council authorize the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer to finance
the expenditures of the above mentioned project:
a)
as was included in the Council approved 2001 and 2002 Capital Budget as
follows:
2001 Capital Budget - Tax Levy $25,000
2002 Capital Budget
Development Charges Reserve Fund - Roads 230,800
Development Charges - City Sharo Reserve Fund 494,800
Total Approved Funding $750,600
b) as by transferring the following funds:
Development Charges Reserve Fund - Roads $4,340
Development Charges - City Share Reserve Fund 9,662
$14.002
PICKERING
REPORT TO
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Report Number: OES 23-03
Date: May 28, 2003
03
Richard Holborn, P.Eng.
Division Head
Municipal Property & Engineering
Subject:
Tender No. T-1-2003 - Tender for Rosebank Road Bridge Replacement
And Road Reconstruction
Recommendation:
1. That Report OES 23-03 regarding the Rosebank Road Bridge Replacement and
Road Reconstruction be received and that;
2. Tender No T-1-2003 submitted by Dagmar Construction Inc. for the Rosebank
Road Bridge Replacement and Road Reconstruction in the amount of $698,330
(7% G ST extra), for a total of $747,213 and a net cost after G.S.T. rebate of
$719,282 be accepted;
3. the total project cost of $794,293 including the tender amount, other associated
project costs, and a total net project cost of $764,602, be approved; and,
4. Council authorize the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer to finance the
expenditures of the above mentioned project:
a) as was included the Council approved 2001 and 2002 Capital Budget as
follows:
2001 Capital Budget - Tax Levy $25,000
2002 Capital Budget
Development Charges Reserve Fund - Roads 230,800
Development Charges - City Share Reserve Fund 494,800
Total Approved Funding $750,600
b) as by transferring the following funds:
Development Charges Reserve Fund - Roads $4,340
Development Charges - City Share Reserve Fund 9,662
$14,002
04
Report OES 23-03 Date: May 28, 2003
Subject: Tender %1-2003
Tender for Rosebank Road Replacement and Road Reconstruction Page 2
Executive Summary: As part of the Capital Budget for 2001 the Rosebank Road
Bridge Replacement and Road Reconstruction detail design and approvals was
identified and approved as a project. A Request for Proposal RFP-4-2002 for
Consulting Services was called and awarded to the firm of Chisholm, Fleming &
Associates in July 2002. The detail design was completed in the Spring of 2003. As
part of the Capital Budget for 2002, funds were budgeted and approved for the
Rosebank Road Bridge Replacement and Road Reconstruction o n R osebank Road
from Toynevale Road to Granite Court. Tender T-1-2003 for these works was issued
on May 9, 2003 and closed on May 23, 2003. The submissions have been reviewed by
the Municipal Property & Engineering Division and by the Manager, Supply & Services
who recommend acceptance of the bid by Dagmar Construction Inc.
Financial Implications:
1.
Tendered Amount
T-1-2003 $698,330
G.S.T. 48,883
Sub Total $747,213
G.S.T. Rebate 27,931
Total $719,282
SUMMARY AVAILABLE FUNDS:
2.
2002 BUDGETED WORKS
2001 BUDGETED WORKS
Account Project Code
2321-6003 02-2321-001-05
2321-6003 01-2321-001-01
FUNDS AVAILABLE
Amount
$725,600
25,000
$750~600
Report OES 23-03 Date: May 28, 2003
Subject: Tender T-1-2003
Tender for Rosebank Road Replacement and Road Reconstruction Page 3
05
ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTING SUMMARY
3.
T-1-2003 - Construction -
Rosebank Road Bridge Replacement and Road Reconstruction
Associated Costs
Material Testing
Utility Relocations
Consultant Fees for Bridge Associated Works
Miscellaneous *
Project Contingency
Total
G.S.T.
G.S.T. Rebate
Total Gross Project Cost
* These costs were incurred in 2002, as part of the preliminary project costs.
$698,330
6,000
20,000
8,000
1,755
8,245
$742,33O
51,963
$794,293
(29,691)
$764~602
Project Cost under (over) Approved Funds
$(14,002)
The Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer has reviewed the budgetary implications
and the financing of the expenditures contained in this report, and has recommended
the sources of the additional required funding to cover the $14,002 shortfall.
Background: Bids for Tender No T-1-2003 were received on Friday, May 23,
2003. Three (3) companies submitted bids at the time of closing. References as
provided by the Iow bidder Dagmar Construction Inc. are deemed acceptable by the
Supervisor, Municipal Works. The Health and Safety policy, Confined Space Entry
Policy and a list of personnel trained in Confined Space, and the CAD 7 form issued by
Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, as submitted by Dagmar Construction Inc.
have been reviewed by the Safety & Training Coordinator and deemed acceptable.
Credit information as provided by Dun & Bradstreet for Dagmar Construction Inc. has
been reviewed by the Senior Financial Analyst and in conjunction with staff's review of
reference information and the bonding available on this project, is deemed acceptable.
Upon careful examination of all tenders, and relevant documents received, the
Operations & Emergency Services Department, Municipal Property & Engineering
Division recommends the Iow bid submitted by Dagmar Construction Inc. in the amount
06
Report OES 23-03 Date: May 28, 2003
Subject: Tender T1-2003
Tender for Rosebank Road Replacement and Road Reconstruction Page 4
of $698,330 (GST extra), and that the total project cost of $764,602 (net GST) be
approved.
This report has been prepared in conjunction with the Manager of Supply & Services
who concurs with the foregoing.
Attachments:
Location Map
Records of Tenders Opened and Checked
Supply & Services Memorandum
red By:
Darrell'. Selsky - ' - / /~
Supe~isor, Municipal Works ~ices
Vera A. Felgemacher
Manager, Supply & Services
Director, Operations & Emergency Services
Ric/~ard W. ~olborn
D' i~on He~d, Municipal Property &
~d'~ineering
DS
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering City Council
T,t~'o~-rf~ ~1. C[¢6n, Cl(~i~f Adm~
MUNICIPAL PROPERTY & ENGINEERING
Attachment For Tender: T-01-2003
ROSEBANK ROAD AND BRIDGE
· :--CqCHMENT# / TOREPORT# OF-. 5 ~3-0 ~
I 0fl ,
FO¥½F.¥AL£
SUBJECT '"
AREA
/
f,LL?-: ,7
A L L/i~b~r~j {U
' :EET
LOCATION MAP
07
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION INCLUDES:
Road reconstruction and bridge replacement
- Reconstruction of Rosebank Road from Toynevale Road to Granite Court
- Replacement of bridge over Petticoat Creek
d.'tsbookertAttachments for Tenders~2OO3i T-01-2003 - Rosebank Road & Bridge. doc
TACH 1"lENT#
~ TOREPORT# ~'~ ,23-03
/ of I
/, of
CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
O9
.May 23,2003
To:
From:
Richard Holborn
Division Head
Municipal Property & Engineering
Darrell Selsky v'/
Supervisor, Municipal Works
Vera A. Felgemacher
Manager, Supply & Services
Subject:
Tender for Rosebank Road Bridge Replacement &
Road Reconstruction
Tender No. T - 1 - 2003
Tenders have been received for the above project. Thirteen companies (13)
companies were invited to participate. An advertisement was placed in the
Daily Commercial News, News Advertiser Community Page and on the City's
Website all of which yielded interest from additional bidders. Nine (9) bidders
picked up tendering documents for a non-refundable fee of $100.00 per set of
which three (3) responded. A copy of the Record of Tenders Opened and
Checked used at the public tender opening is attached.
Purchasing Procedure No. PUR 010-001, Item 10.03 (r) provides checking
tendered unit prices and extensions; unit prices shall govern and extensions
will be corrected accordingly, which has been done.
Summary
(PST included, GST included)
Dagmar Construction Inc. 747,213.88 747,213.88
Elirpa Construction & Materials 832,104.81 832,104.81
Bob Hendricksen Construction Ltd. 857,502.60 857,501.75
Rutherford Contracting Ltd. Unab/e to Bid
1¸0
A'~,-'rACHIViEN'~ ~,- .... ~ TOREPORT# 4....)t~-.~
Tender for Rosebank Road Bridge Replacement & Road Reconstruction
Tender No. T-1-2003, May 23, 2003
Page 2
Pursuant to Information to Bidders Item 21, the following are being requested of the
Iow bidder for your review during the evaluation stage of this tender call:
(a) a copy of the Confined Space Entry Procedure document to be used on this
project;
(b) a list of employees trained in the Confined Space Entry Procedure who will be
working on this project;
(c) a copy of the Health & Safety Policy to be used on this project;
(d) a copy of the cUrrent Cost and Frequency Report issued by Workplace Safety &
Insurance Board (in lieu of the Cost and Frequency document, a copy of the
current CAD 7, NEER; or MAP reports may be submitted);
(e) a copy of the current Certificate of Clearance issued by Workplace Safety &
Insurance Board;
(f) the City's certificate of insurance shall be completed by the bidder's agent,
broker or insurer;
Please review the copies of the bids. Include the following items in your Report to
Council:
(a) if items (a) through (c) noted above, are acceptable to the Safety & Training
Coordinator;
(b) any past work experience Dagmar Construction Inc. including work location;
(c) without past work experience, if reference information is acceptable;
(d) the appropriate account number(s) to which this work is to be charged;
(e) the budget amount(s) assigned thereto;
(f) Treasurer's confirmation of funding;
(g) related departmental approvals;
(h) any reason(s) why the Iow bid of Dagmar Construction Inc. is not acceptable;
and
(i) related comments specific to the project.
If you require further information, please feel free to contact ,~pe.
Vera A. Felgemac'her
Manager, Supply & Services
/bt
Attachments
Copy for: Director, Operations & Emergency Services
11
RECOMMENDATION OF THE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
DATE
MOVED BY
SECONDED BY
That Report CAO 05-03 concerning the implementation of Federal Airport Zoning
Regulations be received for information; and
That Transport Canada be advised that the City supports in principle, the
establishment of Airport Zoning Regulations in order to protect lands surrounding
the federal lands in Pickering, Markham and Uxbridge from uses and activities
that are incompatible with the safe operation of a possible future regional-reliever
airport on the lands; and
That Transport Canada be requested to defer publication of the Airport Zoning
Regulations in the Canada Gazette Part II until appropriate implementation
guidelines are prepared to the satisfaction of the City, the other affected
municipalities, and other public agencies affected by the regulations, including
the preparation of appropriate mitigation techniques for uses affected by the bird
hazard zone; and
That Transport Canada be requested to confirm that it is prepared to modify the
Federal Airport Zone Regulations if necessary, to ensure consistency with the
interim planning work being undertaken by the Greater Toronto Airports
Authority, particularly with respect to possible future runway locations; and
That a copy of this Report be forwarded to Transport Canada; the Greater
Toronto Airports Authority; the Region of Durham; the municipalities of Markham,
Whitby, Ajax, Uxbridge, Whitchurch-Stouffville, and Scugog; and the Toronto
Region Conservation Authority.
PICKERING
REPORT TO
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Report Number: GAO 05-03
Date: May 27, 2003
Thomas J. Quinn
Chief Administrative Officer
Subject:
Federal Lands in Pickering, Markham and Uxbridge
- Implementation of Federal Airport Zoning Regulations
- File: D-7600-003
Recommendations:
1. That Report CAO 05-03 concerning the implementation of Federal Airport Zoning
Regulations be received for information.
That Transport Canada be advised that the City supports in principle, the
establishment of Airport Zoning Regulations in order to protect lands surrounding the
federal lands in Pickering, Markham and Uxbridge from uses and activities that are
incompatible with the safe operation of a possible future regional-reliever airport on
the lands.
That Transport Canada be requested to defer publication of the Airport Zoning
Regulations in the Canada Gazette Part II until appropriate implementation
guidelines are prepared to the satisfaction the City, the other affected municipalities,
and other public agencies affected by the regulations, including the preparation of
appropriate mitigation techniques for uses affected by the bird hazard zone.
That Transport Canada be requested to confirm that it is prepared to modify the
Federal Airport Zoning Regulations if necessary, to ensure consistency with the
interim planning work being undertaken by the Greater Toronto Airports Authority,
particularly with respect to possible future runway locations.
That a copy of this Report be forwarded to Transport Canada; the Greater Toronto
Airports Authority; the Region of Durham; the municipalities of Markham, Whitby,
Ajax, Uxbridge, Whitchurch-Stouffville, and Scugog; and the Toronto Region
Conservation Authority.
Executive Summary:
On April 12, 2003, Transport Canada published notice in the Canada Gazette Part I of
its intention to establish Airport Zoning Regulations around the federal lands in
Pickering, Markham and Uxbridge. The Gazette Part I publication resulted in a 60-day
formal response period, which ends on June 11, 2003.
Report CAO 05-03
Subject: Federal Lands in Pickering, Markham and Uxbridge
Date: May 27, 2003
Page 2
13
This Report provides information on the Federal Airport Zoning Regulations, and
recommends that Council advise Transport Canada that it supports in principle, the
establishment of the proposed Regulations, so long as registration is deferred until
satisfactory implementation guidelines are established and agreed to by the City, the
other affected municipalities, and other public bodies affected by the restrictions.
The Report also recommends that Transport Canada confirm it will adjust the Airport
Zoning Regulations if necessary, so that they are consistent with the Greater Toronto
Airports Authority interim planning process, especially the results of the runway siting
study.
Financial Implications:
There is no cost to the City (other than staff time) in responding to Transport Canada's
notice of intent to establish Airport Zoning Regulations around the federal lands in
Pickering, Markham and Uxbridge.
However, additional costs to the City may be incurred if Transport Canada imposes
significant design or maintenance requirements on the City, with respect to the
establishment of certain uses (such as storm water management ponds, municipal
parks, and community/recreation centres) within the designated bird hazard zone. The
magnitude of such costs cannot be determined without further discussion on the nature
and extent of the "bird mitigation techniques" that will be required for these facilities.
Background:
Below is a brief history of events leading up to Transport Canada's decision to publish
notice of its intention to establish Airport Zoning Regulations (AZR) around the federal
lands in Pickering, Markham and Uxbridge.
Transport Minister David Collenette announced his intention to declare the
federal lands in Pickering, Markham and Uxbridge as an "airport site" under
the federal Aeronautics Act in July 1998.
Pickering Council in December 1998, asked the Minister to not declare an
airport site pending further consultation with Pickering and the other
stakeholders.
Transport Canada subsequently agreed to not declare an airport site
pending further discussions with Pickering, other affected municipalities
and community groups. A "Stakeholders Committee" was established, with
representatives from Pickering, Markham, Whitby, Ajax, Uxbridge,
Whitchurch-Stouffville, Scugog, Durham Region, York Region, the Ajax-
Report CAO 05-03
Subject: Federal Lands in Pickering, Markham and Uxbridge
Date: May 27, 2003
Page 3
Pickering Board of Trade, and a number of local residents and interest
groups.
Between 1999 and 2002, a series of Stakeholder Committee meetings
were held to discuss issues of mutually interest, and to consider an
alternative approach to federal airport zoning. In the end, consensus could
not be reached on a legally and technically acceptable way of implementing
an alternative approach to airport zoning, known as the "municipal by-law"
approach.
The federal lands were declared an "airport site" in August 2001 by the
Federal Minister of Transport (this declaration is required before airport
zoning can be established, even if using the "municipal by-law" approach).
In the latter half of 2002, Transport Canada staff met with staff of the
affected municipalities to explain the federal airport zoning regulations and
obtain technical advice and comments. In October 2002, Transport
Canada presented the draft Airport Zoning Regulations to the City's
Finance & Operations Committee.
In April 2003, the Federal Transport Minister gave notice of his intention to
establish Federal Airport Zoning Regulations. A series of public open
houses were also announced, including two in Pickering (on May 27 at the
Pickering Recreation Complex and on May 31 in Claremont).
Following the receipt of comments, Transport Canada staff will be finalizing a
"Regulatory Impact Analysis" for submission to the Minister. The Analysis will include a
summary of Transport Canada's consultation process as well as a cost-benefit analysis
of the AZR project. The AZR and the Regulatory Impact Analysis will then be
forwarded to various federal government offices for review, and after that, submitted to
Privy Council for final approval. The approved regulation is then published in Canada
Gazette, Part II. The regulation comes into force when it is registered on title, and
published in the local newspapers. Transport Canada has advised that it anticipates
the entire process will take place over the remainder of 2003.
PURPOSE OF AIRPORT ZONING REGULATIONS
The AZR apply to lands adjacent to and in the vicinity of an airport; they do not apply to
the airport site itself. In the case of the federal lands in Pickering, Markham and
Uxbridge, the proposed AZR would extend from almost Highway 404 in Markham to
almost the eastern edge Whitby, and from north of Ballentrae, Goodwood and Coppins
Corners in Whitchurch-Stouffville and Uxbridge, to south of Highway 401 in Pickering
and Ajax (see Attachment No. 1).
Report CAO 05-03
Subject: Federal Lands in Pickering, Markham and Uxbridge
Date: May 27, 2003
Page 4
15
All landowners and lessees within the regulated area must comply with the AZR,
although uses in existence prior to the regulation coming into force would be
grandfathered.
Airport zoning under the federal Aeronautics Act is different from, and should not be
confused with land use zoning under the provincial Planning Act: The AZR proposed
for the Pickering site will provide three types of regulatory controls.
Restrictions on the height of buildings, structures, objects and natural
growth within the take-off and approach surfaces, the transitional surfaces
and the outer surface surrounding the airport site, in order to ensure
obstacle free airspace for the safe manoeuvring of aircraft and to maintain
the operational integrity of the airport~.
Restrictions on land uses and activities that cause electronic interference
with communications or signals to and from aircraft and with other
aeronautical facilities.
3. Restrictions on land uses and activities that cause a bird hazard for
aircraft.
The bird hazard restrictions are of particular interest and significance to Pickering, and
warrant further explanation. Transport Canada has prepared a separate "Guidance
Document" to assist in understanding how the airport zoning restrictions will be applied.
The Guidance Document includes detailed information on the bird hazard regulations.
BIRD HAZARD REGULATIONS
The purpose of the bird hazard provisions of the AZR is to restrict land uses and
activities near the Pickering airport site that attract birds hazardous to the operation of
aircraft and airports. In 2002, a consultant report was completed for Transport Canada
with recommendations concerning the wording of the bird hazard provisions, and the
extent of the bird hazard zone.
Three "bird hazard sub-zones" were identified: a "primary" zone around the take-off and
departure paths; a "secondary" zone extending 4 kilometres from the primary zone; and
"special" bird hazard zone extending another 6 kilometres to the north where the
location of certain uses such as landfills would be of particular concern because they
The take-off and approach surfaces are long sloped surfaces, beginning at each end of a runway,
sloping upwards at a 1.67% slope for the first three kilometres, and then at a 2% slope for the next 12
kilometres. The outer surface is a horizontal ceiling 45 metres (150 feet) above the airport site with a
radius of approximately 6.5 kilometers. The transitional surfaces are much smaller and less restrictive.
They are located on the sides of the take-off/approach surfaces and provide lateral protection for
arriving and departing aircraft.
16
Report CAO 05-03
Subject: Federal Lands in Pickering, Markham and Uxbridge
Date: May 27, 2003
Page 5
would encourage daily bird movements to and from Lake Ontario over the airport site.
Together, the three sub-zones make up the full extent of the Bird Hazard Zone for the
Pickering site.
The consultant report also lists and ranks land uses and activities as Iow risk, moderate
risk, or high risk, according to their location and potential for attracting hazardous birds.
The list is not exhaustive and other land uses and activities may be added as they are
identified. Land uses that are permitted in a particular bird hazard zone are indicated
by a "Yes". In the case of a "No", the use may still be permitted if acceptable bird
mitigation techniques are employed. The list in the consultant report was included by
Transport Canada in its Airport Zoning Guidance Document (see Attachment No.2).
Preliminary discussions have begun with Transport Canada staff as to the type of "bird
mitigation techniques" that would be required in order to allow certain uses in the table
that are of particular interest to the affected municipalities, including stormwater
management ponds, municipal parks, and community/recreation centres. However, to
date, agreement has not been reached on the appropriate level and type of mitigation
that would be required, and more discussion with Transport Canada is needed.
Accordingly, although the establishment of Federal Airport Zoning Regulations can be
supported in principle, it is recommended that Council request Transport Canada to
defer publication of the Airport Zoning Regulations in the Canada Gazette Part II until
appropriate implementation guidelines are prepared, to the satisfaction the City, the
other affected municipalities, and other public agencies affected by the regulations,
including the preparation of appropriate mitigation techniques for uses affected by the
bird hazard zone.
RELATIONSHIP TO THE GREATER TORONTO AIRPORTS AUTHORITY
INTERIM PLANNING PROCESS
It is important to note that Transport Canada established the Airport Zoning Regulation
height restrictions based on an earlier concept for a full-international airport on the
Pickering lands. This concept provided for "runway envelopes" that were significantly
larger than would be established through a more detailed planning exercise as is
currently being undertaken by the Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA) through its
interim planning process. The GTAA is completing a runway siting study and should
have results early in 2004. We understand that the runways identified by the GTAA will
probably lie within the broad runway envelopes proposed under the full-international
concept being used by Transport Canada to establish the AZR, but this cannot be
verified until the GTAA study is completed.
Accordingly it is recommended that Council request Transport Canada to confirm that it
is prepared to modify the Federal Airport Zoning Regulations if necessary, to ensure
consistency with the interim planning work being undertaken by the Greater Toronto
Airports Authority, particularly with respect to possible future runway locations.
Report CAO 05-03
Subject: Federal Lands in Pickering, Markham and Uxbridge
Date: May 27, 2003
Page 6
1¸7
Attachments:
1. Draft Pickering Airport Site Zoning Regulations (map)
2. Land Use Within the Bird Hazard Zone (table)
Prepared By:
Approved / Endorsed By:
Division Head, Corporate Pro~ts & Policy Chief Administrative Officer
TM
Attachments
Copy: Director, Planning & Development
Division Head, Corporate Projects & Policy
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering Ci,ty Council
"l'J~f'as-J. O~n, Ch' f~dminis~' '~~.
Z
ATTACHMENT ~ ~._.L.~TO REPORT #~ ~::~- ~-~
ATTACHMENT# ~ TO REPORT#C,I~(~ ~-~
Land Use Within the Bird Hazord Zone
Land'Uses**
High Risk
Putrescible Was~iLandtqH§
Food Waste
Wildlife Re fugr~; :~0wl
Racetracks
Feed. Stns.
Permitted Land Uses*
Primary Secondarv
Specia 1
Moderate Risk
Open or Partially Enclosed
Waste Transfer Stations
Cattle Paddocks
Sewage Lagoons
Municipal Parks, Picnic Areas
Golf Courses
No No No
No No No
No No No
No No No
No No Yes
No No Yes
No No Yes
No No Yes
No No Yes
Low Risk
Dry Waste Landfills No
Man-made ~arshes, Swamps and Mudaats
Commercial Shopping Malls, Plazas
Fasffood Restaurants
Outdoor Restaurants No
Schoolyards No
Community/Recreation Centres No
Potentially Risky
Poultry Factory Farms
Enclosed Waste Transfer Stations
Wet/Dry Recycling Facilities
Stormwater Management Ponds
Plowing/Cultivating
No Risk
Compost Facilities
Natural Habitats
Agricultural Fields
Haying
Rural Ornamental and Farm Ponds
Residential Areas
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
*Land uses and activities existing prior to the coming
are deemed to be legally non-conforming.
into force of the Pickering Airport Site Zoning Regulations
**Contact Transport Canada for land uses not listed. When introducing permitted land uses, it is still prudent for
landowners to use recommended mitigation techniques or "best practices" to ensure that the level of risk is not
increased to a level that is restricted by the AZR.
*** While a "No" indicates that a particular land use is restricted in one or all of the bird zones, this use may still be
permitted if acceptable bird mitigation techniques are employed.
NB: This page is part of TPI4026E and must be interpreted within the context of the entire document.
Transport Canada, Aerodrome Safety, ANS & Airspace, February 20, 2003
Canad
RECOMMENDATION OF THE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
DATE
MOVED BY
SECONDED BY
That the draft by-law for the removal of one person and appointment of one
person to enforce the Parking By-law at 1355 Kingston Road, Pickering Town
Centre, be forwarded to Council for approval.
REPORT TO
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Report Number: CL 16-03
Date: May 27, 2003
From: Bruce Taylor
City Clerk
Subject:
Appointment to enforce the Parking By-law at 1355 Kingston Road,
Pickering Town Centre.
Recommendation:
That the draft by-law for the removal of one person and appointment of one
person to enforce the Parking By-law at 1355 Kingston Road, Pickering Town
Centre, be forwarded to Council for approval.
Executive Summary: Not Applicable
Financial Implications: None
Background: Correspondence has been received from Pickering Town Centre
requesting the removal of one person and appointment of one person as a By-law
Enforcement Officer for the purpose of enforcing the Parking By-law at 1355 Kingston
Road, Pickering Town Centre.
Attachments:
Correspondence from Pickering Town Centre
Draft By-law
Prepared By:
Debbie Kearns
Committee Coordinator
Approved I Endorsed By:
ruce Taylor
City Clerk
Report CL 16-03 Date: May 27, 2003
22
Subject: Appointment of By-law Enforcement Officer Page 2
BT:dk
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering City Council
Tl~r~a~ ~J. Q~inn, CHief Ad"r~st~tive O~cer
iATTACHMENT #,,
TO REPORT #c~,~,~
Wednesday, May 21,2003
Pickering Town Centre
1355 Kingston Road
L1V 1B8
(905) 683-7171 ex. 231
Re: MLEO exchange
Dear Debbie Kearns,
I would like to request that James LEFAVE be removed from the MLEO list, and
be substituted with Randy WHITE.
Sincerely,
Marcus J a~or~kY
Security Su~rvisor
Cc: Sam Lindo
Security Manager
Administration Office, 1355 Kingston Road, Picketing, Ontario L1V 1B8
Telephone 905-831-6066 Facsimile 905-420-9379 Website www. pickeringtowncentre.com
IATTACHMENT #
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO.
z.. TO REPORT
Being a by-law to appoint By-law Enforcement Officers for certain
purposes (Parking Regulation - 1355 Kingston Road, Pickering
Town Centre)
WHEREAS pursuant to section 15(I)of the Police Services Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.15, as
amended, a municipal council may appoint persons to enforce the by-laws of the
municipality; and
WHEREAS pursuant to section 15(2) of the said Act, municipal by-law enforcement
officers are peace officers for the purpose of enforcing municipal by-laws;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF
PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
That Randy White be hereby appointed as municipal law enforcement officer in
and for the City of Picketing in order to ascertain whether the provisions of By-
law 2359/87 are obeyed and to enforce or carry into effect the said By-law and
are hereby authorized to enter at all reasonable times upon lands municipally
known as 1355 Kingston Road.
The authority granted in section I hereto is specifically limited to that set out in
section 1, and shall not be deemed, at any time, to exceed the authority set out in
section 1.
This appointment shall expire upon the person listed in section 1 ceasing to be
an employee of Picketing Town Centre.
By-law 6058~02 is hereby amended by deleting James LeFave.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 16th day of June,
2003.
Wayne Arthurs, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
25
RECOMMENDATION OF THE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
DATE
MOVED BY
SECONDED BY
That the draft by-law to appoint two persons to enforce the Parking By-law at
1822 Whites Rd. N., and 1100 Begley St., be forwarded to Council for approval.
REPORT TO
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Report Number: CL 14-03
Date: May 12, 2003
From: Bruce Taylor
City Clerk
Subject:
Appointment to enforce the Parking By-law at 1822 Whites Rd. N. & 1100
Begley St.
Recommendation:
That the draft by-law to appoint two persons to enforce the Parking By-law at
1822 Whites Rd. N., and 1100 Begley St., be forwarded to Council for approval.
Executive Summary: Not Applicable
Financial Implications: None
Background: Correspondence has been received from Securitas Canada
requesting the appointment of two persons as By-law Enforcement Officers for the
purpose of enforcing the Parking By-law at 1822 Whites Rd. N. and 1100 Begley St..
Attachments:
Correspondence from Securitas Canada
Draft By-law
Prepared By:
Debbie Kearns
Committee Coordinator
Approved I Endorsed By:
Bruce Taylor
City Clerk
Report CL 14-03
Subject: Appointment of By-law Enforcement Officers
Date:
BT:dk
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering City Council
// ~'
TIl~r~as J. Qui~'n, Ch~i~~ ~i
May 12, 2003
Page 2
27
28
J ATTACHMENT #
TO REPORT
Tuesday April 29, 2003
CITY 07 ~;~I,5;KF2RING
CLERK'S DIVISION
To whom it may concern;
Please consider the following employees for Private Parking Enceforcement Officers at
the following locations.
1822 Whites Rd North Pickering
1100 Begley St Pickering
Roger Wiggins
Rebecca Davis
Thank you for your time
Colleen Anderson
Senior Mobile Supervisor
Securitas Canada Limited
Securitas Canada
909 Simcoe Street North, Unit lC
Oshawa, Ontario L1G4Wl
Telephone: (905) 571-4040
Fax: (905) 571-0617
iATTAcHMENT #.,
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO.
z TO REPORT
Being a by-law to appoint By-law Enforcement Officers for certain
purposes (Parking Regulation - 1822 Whites Rd. N. and
1100 Begley St.)
WHEREAS pursuant to section 15(I) of the Police Services Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.15, as
amended, a municipal council may appoint persons to enforce the by-laws of the
municipality; and
WHEREAS pursuant to section 15(2) of the said Act, municipal by-law enforcement
officers are peace officers for the purpose of enforcing municipal by-laws;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF
PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
That Roger Wiggins and Rebecca Davis be hereby appointed as municipal law
enforcement officers in and for the City of Pickering in order to ascertain whether
the provisions of By-law 2359/87 are obeyed and to enforce or carry into effect
the said By-law and are hereby authorized to enter at all reasonable times upon
lands municipally known as 1822 Whites Rd. N. and 1100 Begley St.
The authority granted in section 1 hereto is specifically limited to that set out in
section 1, and shall not be deemed, at any time, to exceed the authority set out in
section 1.
These appointments shall expire upon the persons listed in section 1 ceasing to
be employees of Secudtas Canada or upon Secudtas Canada, ceasing to be an
agent of 1822 Whites Rd. N. or 1100 Begley St., or upon whichever shall occur
first.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 16th day of June,
2003.
Wayne Arthurs, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk