Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMay 15, 2025Committee of Adjustment Agenda Hearing Number: 5 Date: Thursday, May 15, 2025 pickering.ca Agenda Committee of Adjustment Thursday, May 15, 2025 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Members of the public may observe the hearing by viewing the livestream. Members of the public looking to provide a verbal delegation to Committee Members may do so through a virtual connection into the hearing. For more information, and to register to participate please visit pickering.ca/committeeofadjustment and complete the online participation form or email citydev@pickering.ca. Page Number 1. Disclosure of Interest 2. Adoption of Agenda 3. Adoption of Minutes from April 9, 2025 hearing 1-15 4. Reports 4.1 MV 28/25 – 360 Rosebank Road 16-25 4.2 MV 29/25 – 1340 Anton Square 26-30 4.3 MV 30/25 – 624 Marksbury Road 31-51 4.4 MV 31/25 – 1421 Rougemount Drive 52-57 4.5 MV 32/25 – 1848 Appleview Road 58-64 4.6 MV 34/25 – 2169 Saffron Drive 65-71 5. Adjournment For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Secretary-Treasurer or Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Telephone: 905.420.4617 Email: citydev@pickering.ca Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, April 9, 2025 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 1 of 15 Pending Adoption Present Denise Rundle – Vice-Chair Sakshi Sood Joshi Rick Van Andel Sean Wiley – Chair Also Present Deborah Wylie, Secretary-Treasurer Jasmine Correia, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Nilissa Reynolds, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer – Host Kerry Yelk, Planner II Ash Roy, Planner I Figo Pham, Zoning Technician Absent Omar Ha-Redeye 1. Disclosure of Interest Sakshi Sood Joshi declared a conflict of interest for Item 4.7, MV 27/25, and will abstain from participating in that application. Due to an absence, Sean Wiley will abstain from voting in tonight’s hearing, with the exception of Item 4.7. 2. Adoption of Agenda Moved by Rick Van Andel Seconded by Sakshi Sood Joshi That the agenda for the Wednesday, April 9, 2025, hearing be adopted. Carried Unanimously 3. Adoption of Minutes Moved by Rick Van Andel Seconded by Denise Rundle That the amended minutes of the 3rd hearing of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, March 12, 2025, be adopted. Carried Unanimously -1- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, April 9, 2025 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 2 of 15 4. Minor Variance Reports 4.1 MV 14/25 S. Sharieff 1875A Glendale Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24, to permit a minimum parking requirement of 2.0 spaces in total, whereas the By-law requires a minimum of 2.0 parking spaces for a detached dwelling, plus 1.0 additional space for an Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU), for a total requirement of 3.0 parking spaces. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain a building permit to construct a basement additional dwelling unit. Input from other sources was received from the Applicant, City’s Engineering Services and Durham Region Community Growth and Economic Development. In support of the application, the applicant identified that under the By-law, each dwelling unit must have a minimum of two parking spaces, provided either within an attached garage or as one space in an attached garage and one in the driveway immediately in front of the garage. Shajuddin Sharieff, applicant, and Muhammad Usama, agent, were present to represent the application. One area resident was present to provide comments on the application. The agent commented that the intent of the application is to build a secondary dwelling basement apartment. In objection to the application, an area resident listed the following concerns: not appropriate for a townhouse complex; the report states this request is for a detached dwelling however they live in a row townhouse; the grading between the houses; as per the developer and City Hall there is a requirement for a specific amount of greenery on each property; the loss of useable space; and the neighbourhood is already congested. In response to a question from a Committee member, the Secretary Treasurer confirmed that the application description should read townhouse rather than detached, however an ADU is a permitted use within a townhouse unit and the parking requirement is the same. A Committee member expressed concerns with the potential negative parking impact on Glendale Drive due to witnessing several cars parked on the east side of Glendale Drive along with boulevard parking during a site visit. -2- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, April 9, 2025 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 3 of 15 In response to a question from a Committee member the agent confirmed that the tenant will receive one designated parking space on site. The owner currently uses the garage for parking. The owner is aware of the parking bylaws. In response to a question from a Committee member, the Secretary Treasurer clarified that amended zoning requirements for ADUs were undertaken in 2023. In response to a question from a Committee member, the agent clarified that access to the unit would be from the side of the house. The windows noted on the plan exist. This house is slightly raised, and they do not anticipate any negative impacts with the grading. After reading the report and the province’s position on housing, Rick Van Andel moved the following motion: Moved by Rick Van Andel That application MV 14/25 by S. Sharieff, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance applies only to the proposed development, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated April 9, 2025). Motion Lost After a site visit and due to the potential negative impact on parking, Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Sakshi Sood Joshi That application MV 14/25 by S. Sharieff, be Refused on the grounds that the requested variance is not minor in nature, not desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Carried Vote: Denise Rundle in favour Sakshi Sood Joshi in favour Rick Van Andel opposed -3- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, April 9, 2025 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 4 of 15 4.2 MV 17/25 R. Navaratnam & N. Rasanayagam 405 Frontier Court The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24, to permit a maximum lot coverage of 43 percent, whereas the By-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 35 percent. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain a building permit to recognize an existing uncovered deck. Input from other sources was received from the Applicant, City’s Engineering Services, the City’s Building Services Section, and one area resident. In support of the application, the applicant identified that as the deck was constructed by the previous owner, the applicant respectfully requests to preserve the deck in its current condition. Noeline Rasa and Ruban Navaratnam, applicants, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. The applicants stated that when they purchased the home, they were not aware that there was a pending building permit. They had come to an arrangement with the neighbours to heighten the fence to aid in privacy with lattice work. In response to a Committee member, the Secretary Treasurer stated there is a fence by-law and the maximum height is 2.0 metres. There is a process if owners require something slightly higher. Moved by Sakshi Sood Joshi Seconded by Denise Rundle That application MV 17/25 by R. Navaratnam & N. Rasanayagam, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance applies only to the rear yard deck, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2 & 3 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated April 9, 2025). 2. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, a fence is to be constructed along the rear lot line to the maximum permitted height in accordance with Fence By-law 6943/09. Carried Unanimously -4- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, April 9, 2025 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 5 of 15 4.3 MV 23/25 A. Carinelli 1428 Parkham Crescent The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24, to permit a maximum lot coverage of 35.7 percent, whereas the By-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to construct an addition to the existing detached dwelling. Andrew Carinelli, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. The applicant withdrew the application. 4.4 MV 24/25 2797373 Ontario Ltd. 1837 New Street The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24, to permit: • a maximum dwelling height of 9.6 metres, whereas the By-law permits a maximum dwelling height of 9.0 metres; and • a minimum side yard setback: one side (south) 1.5 metres and other side (north) 1.8 metres, whereas the By-law permits one side 1.5 metres and other side 2.4 metres. The applicant requests approval of these variances to obtain a building permit to construct a detached dwelling. Input from other sources was received from the Applicant, City’s Engineering Services, and the City’s Building Services Section. In support of the application, the applicant identified that the requests are minor in nature and consistent with the new development on the street Sarah Molinaro, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In response to a question from a Committee member, the Secretary-Treasurer confirmed that the subject lands meet the minimum lot frontage requirement. -5- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, April 9, 2025 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 6 of 15 Moved by Sakshi Sood Joshi Seconded by Rick Van Andel That application MV 24/25 by 2797373 Ontario Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated April 9, 2025). Carried Unanimously 4.5 MV 25/25 L. Cinco 1486 Old Forest Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24, to permit: • a maximum dwelling depth of 22.9 metres, whereas the By -law permits a maximum of 20.0 metres; • a minimum side yard setback of 0.9 metres, whereas the By-law permits a minimum of 1.5 metres; and • a maximum lot coverage of 36 percent, whereas the By-law permits a maximum of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain a building permit to construct a replacement dwelling. Input from other sources were received from the Applicant, City’s Engineering Services, City’s Building Services Section and the City’s Fire Services Department. In support of the application, the applicant identified that the average lot frontage in the neighborhood is 15.24 metres. However, this lot has a reduced frontage which would result in a house width of just 4.33 metres. Daren Hanna, agent, was present to represent the application. One area resident was present to comment on the application. The agent commented that these variances are required as a result of the lot configuration. -6- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, April 9, 2025 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 7 of 15 An area resident expressed concerns regarding loss of trees and damage of existing trees. In response to resident concerns, the agent confirmed that the proposal does remove at least six trees, and are willing to replant new trees, especially in the front of the house. In response to a question from a Committee member, the agent confirmed the owner’s intention is for the house to be used as a single-family dwelling. Moved by Rick Van Andel Seconded by Sakshi Sood Joshi That application MV 25/25 by L. Cinco, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the replacement dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2 & 3 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated April 9, 2025). Carried Unanimously 4.6 MV 26/25 2706858 Ontario Inc. 985 Brock Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24, to permit a maximum aggregate gross leasable floor area of 505 square metres for all restaurants on the lot, whereas the By-law permits the maximum aggregate gross leasable floor area of 400 square metres for all restaurants on the lot. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain a building permit to permit an additional restaurant use within the existing commercial building. Input from other sources were received from the Applicant, City’s Engineering Services, City’s Building Services Section. In support of the application, the applicant has submitted a Planning Rationale. Please contact the City Development Department to receive a copy of this rationale at citydev@pickering.ca. Mallory Nievas and Sidra Asif, agents, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. -7- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, April 9, 2025 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 8 of 15 The agent made a brief presentation in support of the application. In response to questions from Committee members, the agent confirmed that they do have a tenant lined up for the space. The tenant was not aware of the restrictions on the use of the subject lands; they were made aware when they applied for a building permit for internal modifications. The intent is for this to be a take-out restaurant; the space is too small to accommodate seating. It is believed that this variance is consistent with the PPS given the fact that it is already an existing use, it is a small increase. A Committee member commented that in terms of consistency this does look like it would suite the neighbourhood as there is a plaza to the south with two restaurants, a convenience store and a cannabis shop. In response to questions from Committee members, the agent stated that the zoning that applies requires around three spaces per square footage which equates to what the existing supply is. A Committee member commented that an extra 1000 square feet of restaurant use will not change the mix of the building, it will increase the floor area of the restaurant use. Looking at the site, this is a highly visible corner with auto related uses, small food establishments, a huge vacant parcel of land to the north, and other commercial uses and strip plazas on that corner. Given the fact that this application does not offend the intent of the Provincial Policy Statement and Official Plan, Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Sakshi Sood Joshi That application MV 26/25 by 2706858 Ontario Inc., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance applies only to the proposed restaurant use in the existing commercial building, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2 & 3 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated April 9, 2025). 2. No seating to be permitted in the proposed take -out restaurant. Carried Unanimously -8- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, April 9, 2025 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 9 of 15 4.7 MV 27/25 Mattamy (Seaton) Limited Whitevale Road (Lot 41, Block 92 on SP-2009-11) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24, to permit a minimum rear yard setback of 5.32 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 6.0 metres. The applicant seeks approval of this minor variance application to permit the construction of a single detached dwelling as part of Phase 2 of the Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2009-11. Input from other sources were received from the Applicant, City’s Engineering Services, and the City’s Building Services Section. In support of the application, the applicant has submitted a Cover Letter. Please contact the City Development Department to receive a copy of this letter at citydev@pickering.ca. Jacob Stampfli, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Rick Van Andel Seconded by Denise Rundle That application MV 27/25 by Mattamy (Seaton) Limited, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance applies only to the proposed development, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2 & 3 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated April 9, 2025). Carried Unanimously -9- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, April 9, 2025 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 10 of 15 5. Consent Reports 5.1 LD 03/25 & MV 12/25 I. Syed 900 Vistula Avenue Consent Application LD 03/25 proposes the creation of one additional residential lot. The applicant is proposing to sever a 437.7 square metre residential parcel of land (Part 2), retaining an 806.8 square metre residential parcel of land (Part 1). The existing dwelling on Part 1 will remain. Minor Variance Application MV 12/25 requests variances to permit a proposed dwelling on Part 2. This application will be considered concurrently with Consent Application LD 03/25. Input from other sources were received from the Applicant, City’s Engineering Services, City’s Building Services Section, the City’s Fire Services Department, Region of Durham Community Growth and Economic Development and Works Departments and the Toronto and Region Conservation Area (TRCA). In support of the application, the applicant identified that TRCA required rear lot line to be moved inward for tree protection. Rock Kim, agent, was present to represent the application. Three area residents were present to comment on the application. The agent stated the following in support of the applications: the applicant had tried to receive a severance in 2023 and were unable to resolve TRCA conditions; the setback issues are due to the property backing onto TRCA lands, the awkward configuration of the rear of the property; and the number of trees in the area and between houses that are TRCA regulated to assist in the impact. An area resident stated the following concerns in objection to the application: a petition was submitted in objection; property standard issues; tree damage and removal; loss of open space between houses; the aesthetic of the house isn’t consistent with the neighbourhood; and the potential of multiple tenants. An area resident stated the following concerns in objection to the application: noise complaints regarding Air BnB bookings; safety with the fire pit; loss of privacy; loss of trees and wildlife; and increased traffic regarding construction. -10- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, April 9, 2025 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 11 of 15 An area resident stated the following concerns in objection to the application: size of the building and the setback from the street; loss of privacy; the proposed size of the deck and the proximity to the lot line; property standards issue; the potential for it to become an Air BnB; and fire pit safety. In response to questions from a Committee member the applicant clarified the following: the property was temporarily used as an Air BnB, now it is currently rented out to student tenants; the fire pit is not permitted, the tenants have been advised of that ; the firepit was moved and any ads that advertised the pit was removed; they are currently renovating the house and have neighbourhood kids who come by to cut the lawn; and they have hired a professional pool company to assist with maintenance of the pool. In response to a question from a Committee member, the agent clarified that the deck is on the ground floor, there is no variance required for the height of the deck or the size of the deck. In response to questions from Committee members the applicant commented that the design of the house or backyard is not the focus as they are subject to change at the building permit stage, and they are willing to take resident concerns into consideration. The property is on a large piece of land with a large open space on the left side that is unused and can accommodate a single-family dwelling. The variances being requested is to allow for buildable space on the property. There will be no further variance requests for the severed parcel. The Secretary-Treasurer commented that the minimum lot coverage is the only variance required to facilitate the severance. The other four variances are based on the proposed design of a proposed dwelling shown on the submitted plans. A Committee member advised the residents to continue contacting the City regarding the property standard and fire safety issues. Concerned that the proposed severed lot may cause a negative impact to traffic turning maneuvers, driveway location, and proposed dwelling being closer to the intersection. There is only one variance required to permit the severance, the other four variances are being requested without having a solid building plan, as the applicant stated there is potential for it to change are th e building permit stage. The proposed dwelling seems too large for the proposed parcel size. A Committee member commented that there would not be a need for variances if the TRCA land wasn’t behind the house. The proposed dwelling is almost in line with the existing dwelling, without too much encroachment to the north properties. -11- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, April 9, 2025 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 12 of 15 In the matter of LD 03/25, after reviewing the staff report, agency comments, resident comments and the petition, and after a site visit and with considering Section 51(24) criteria, particularly as it relates to existing and proposed restrictions, Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Moved by Denise Rundle That application LD 03/25 by I. Syed, be Refused, with respect to Section 51(24) of the Planning Act criteria. And In the matter of MV 12/25, the proposed shape and size of the new lot is not compatible with the existing lotting arrangement on Vistula Drive, the proposed reduction in lot area together with the increase in lot coverage and reduce the rear yard setback is not appropriate development of the land, and the five variances do not maintain the intent of the Zoning By-laws, as such, Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Moved by Denise Rundle That application MV 12/25 by I. Syed., be Refused on the grounds that the requested variances are not minor in nature, not desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw. 1. That these variances apply only to the severed lot (Part 2) and proposed development, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 3, 4, 5 & 6 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, April 9, 2025). Motion Lost Considering the applicant had made it clear that the plan for the future lot is not yet confirmed, Sakshi Sood Joshi made the following motions: Moved by Sakshi Sood Joshi Seconded by Rick Van Andel That application LD 03/25 by I. Syed, be Approved as applied for, as it generally complies with all applicable plans and policies, subject to the conditions outlined within Appendices I, II, III and IV. And -12- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, April 9, 2025 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 13 of 15 That the variance for the lot area for application MV 12/25 by I. Syed, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance applies only to the severed lot (Part 2) and proposed development, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 3 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, April 9, 2025). And That the variances for the maximum driveway width, lot coverage, rear yard setback and the deck encroachment for application MV 12/25 by I. Syed, be Refused on the grounds that the requested variances are not minor in nature, not desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law. Carried Vote: Denise Rundle opposed Sakshi Sood Joshi in favour Rick Van Andel in favour 5.2 LD 04/25 & MV 16/25 B. & M. Marchand 696 & 692 Hillview Crescent The applicant is proposing to sever a 375.6 square metre portion of land (Part 3) to convey it to the abutting land locked property to the west, municipally known as 692 Hillview Crescent, to provide access to Hillview Crescent. A 1,395.0 square metre parcel of land (Parts 2 & 3) is proposed to be retained. A variance is required to permit a reduced lot frontage for the severed parcel (Part 3). Input from other sources were received from the Applicant, City’s Engineering Services, City’s Building Services Section, the City’s Fire Services Department, the Region of Durham Community Growth and Economic Development and Works Departments and the Toronto and Region Conservation Area (TRCA). In support of the application, the applicant would like to sever the existing easement of 696 Hillview Crescent and add it to 692 Hillview Crescent. The purpose is to make the driveway part of 692 Hillview Crescent and no longer have an easement. -13- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, April 9, 2025 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 14 of 15 Ben Marchand, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. The applicant commented that they are trying to eliminate the access right-of-way over 696 Hillview Crescent and to combine the lands subject of the right-of-way with 692 Hillview Crescent. The lands to be combined with 692 Hillview Crescent will continue to function as a driveway for 692 Hillview Crescent. The purpose of these applications is to ensure that should 696 Hillview Crescent be purchased by someone, access to 692 Hillview Crescent is not disrupted or that the access to 692 Hillview Crescent will not be blocked or used for other purposes. In response to a question from a Committee member the applicant stated that t his property was severed in 1986, and part of that severance is that you are not allowed to landlock anyone, as a result the right-of-way was granted. Moved by Rick Van Andel Seconded by Sakshi Sood Joshi That application LD 04/25 by B. & M. Marchand, be Approved, with respect to Section 51(24) of the Planning Act criteria, subject to the conditions outlined within Appendices I, II and III. And That application MV 16/25 by B. & M. Marchand, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance applies only to the severed land, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2 & 3 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated April 9, 2025) Carried Unanimously 5.3 LD 05/25 W. Iqbal Burnside Drive The applicant is proposing to sever a 611.9 square metre parcel of land (Part 1) while retaining a 387.3 square metre parcel of land (Parts 2 & 3). The subject lands are presently vacant. The applicant intends to construct new detached dwellings on the severed and retained parcels. Part 4 will be conveyed to the city for a future cul -de-sac. -14- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, April 9, 2025 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 15 of 15 Wajid Iqbal, applicant, and Imran Khan, agent, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Rick Van Andel That application LD 05/25 by W. Iqbal, be Tabled to allow the applicant to address the comments identified in the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) memo dated April 2, 2025, to the satisfaction of TRCA. Carried Unanimously 6. Adjournment Moved by Rick Van Andel Seconded by Denise Rundle That the 4th hearing of the 2025 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 9:12 pm. Carried Unanimously __________________________ Date __________________________ Chair __________________________ Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Please note the Committee of Adjustment Hearings are available for viewing on the City of Pickering YouTube channel www.youtube.com/@CityPickering -15- Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 28/25 Date: May 15, 2025 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Minor Variance Application MV 28/25 R. Muhammadi 360 Rosebank Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24, to permit a minimum side yard setback: one side (south) of 1.5 metres and the other side (north) of 1.8 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum side yard setback: one side 1.5 metres and the other side 2.4 metres. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain a building permit to construct an addition to an existing detached dwelling. Recommendation For your information, and based solely on the application and supporting documentation filed by the applicant, the City Development Department has reviewed the application with respect to Section 45(1) of the Planning Act and considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By -law. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following conditions are recommended: 1.That this variance applies only to the proposed addition, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7). 2.Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit the applicant is to provide written acknowledgement that an Additional Dwelling Unit requires a total three parking spaces located entirely on the lot and that an Additional Dwelling Unit is to be registered with the Building Services Department. Background Former Zoning By-law 2511 permitted interior side yard setbacks of 1.5 metres for both sides, when an attached garage was provided. Howeve r, the owner is proposing to convert the existing garage into additional living space for the existing detached dwelling requiring side yards of 2.4 metres on one side and 1.5 metres on the other side. The existing dwelling is now in non-compliance with the Zoning By-law as the existing side yards are 1.8 metres on one side and 1.5 on the other side. The applicant does not intend to increase the existing footprint of the detached dwelling. The requested variance was determined through a zoning review for a submitted Building Permit Application. -16- Report MV 28/25 May 15, 2025 Page 2 Comment General Intent and Purpose of the Official Plan Under the Regional Official Plan, the subject property is designated “Urban System – Community Areas”. The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject site Urban Residential – Low Density within the Rosebank Neighbourhood. City Policy 12.3(a) encourages the established residential areas along Rosebank Road, to require new development to be compatible with the character of existing development. Lands within these designations are intended to accommodate residential uses including detached dwellings. The subject property is located within an Established Neighbourhood Overlay Precinct. Staff have reviewed and made comment on the proposed dwelling using the Council adopted Urban Design Guidelines for Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhood Precincts Checklist, which can be found as Appendix A and Appendix B to this report. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan. General Intent and Purpose of the Zoning By-law The subject property is zoned “R1E” – Detached Residential under Consolidated Zoning By-law 8149/24. A detached dwelling along with accessory uses are permitted. The applicant has proposed a south side yard of 1.5 metres and a north side yard of 1.8 metres, whereas the By-law permits one side yard to be 1.5 metres and the other to be 2.4 metres. The intent of this provision is to provide an appropriate separation between structures on abutting properties to maintain pedestrian access, and to accommodate grading, drainage, and other residential services. There is sufficient space between the existing detached dwelling and adjacent lots to provide pedestrian access, and to accommodate grading, drainage and residential services. Staff is of the opinion that the reduced side yard maintains the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Desirable for the Appropriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The requested variance will facilitate the construction of converting an attached garage into additional living space. The proposed setbacks accommodate appropriate soft landscape coverage and allow for appropriate drainage. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is desirable for the appropriate development of the land and is minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Applicant •By-law allows reduced side yards when a private garage is attached to a residential dwelling. Durham Region Community Growth and Economic Development •No comments. -17- Report MV 28/25 May 15, 2025 Page 3 Engineering Services •No comments. Fire Services •No comments. Building Services •No concerns or comments; Building Permit application received, waiting on Committees decision. Public Input •No written submissions have been received from the public as of the date of writing this report. Date of report: May 8, 2025 Comments prepared by: Kerry Yelk Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner II Manager, Zoning & Administration KY:nr /CityDevDept/D3700/2025/MV 28-25/7. Report/MV 28-25 Report.docx Attachments Original Signed By Original Signed By -18- -04;6/- PlCKERlNG City Development Department l:\PLANNING\01 -MapFiles\MV\2025\MV 28-25\MV 28-25.aprx Subject _ ______, 1 Lands Location Ma File: MV 28/25 ""O ro 0 er: .:,t. C ro ..c Q) Cl) 0 er: Nomad Road Rosebank South Park Munici al Address: 360 Rosebank Road © Th e Co rporati on of th e C ity of Picke rin g Prod uced (in part) u nder li cense from: © King's Pri nter, Ontario Min istry of Natura l Resources. All rights reserved.;© His Ma jesty the King in Rig ht of Ca nada , Department of Natu ra l Resou rces. A ll rig hts reserved .;© Tera net Enterprises Inc. and its su ppli ers. A ll ri g hts reserved .;© Munici pa l Property Assessment Corporation and its supplie rs. A ll rig hts reserved . Exhibit 1 Date: Mar. 18, 2025 SCALE : 1:2,000 THIS ISNOTAPLANOFSURVEY. -19- Exhibit 2 to permit a minimum side yard setback: one side (south) 1.5 metres and other side (north) 1.8 metres Rosebank Road Submitted Site Plan File No: MV 28/25 Applicant: R. Muhammadi Municipal Address: 360 Rosebank Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: May 8, 2025 -20- Ex h i b i t 3 Su b m i t t e d F r o n t ( E a s t ) E l e v a t i o n Fi l e N o : M V 2 8 / 2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : R . M u h a m m a d i Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 3 6 0 R o s e b a n k R o a d CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : A p r i l 2 8 , 2 0 2 5 -21- Ex h i b i t 4 Su b m i t t e d S i d e ( S o u t h ) E l e v a t i o n Fi l e N o : M V 2 8 / 2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : R . M u h a m m a d i Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 3 6 0 R o s e b a n k R o a d CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : A p r i l 2 8 , 2 0 2 5 -22- Ex h i b i t 5 Su b m i t t e d R e a r E l e v a t i o n Fi l e N o : M V 2 8 / 2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : R . M u h a m m a d i Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 3 6 0 R o s e b a n k R o a d CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : A p r i l 2 8 , 2 0 2 5 -23- Ex h i b i t 6 Su b m i t t e d G r o u n d F l o o r P l a n Fi l e N o : M V 2 8 / 2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : R . M u h a m m a d i Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 3 6 0 R o s e b a n k R o a d CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : M a y 8 , 2 0 2 5 -24- Ex h i b i t 7 Su b m i t t e d S e c on d F l o o r P l a n Fi l e N o : M V 2 8 / 2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : R . M u h a m m a d i Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 3 6 0 R o s e b a n k R o a d CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : M a y 8 , 2 0 2 5 -25- Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 29/25 Date: May 15, 2025 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Minor Variance Application MV 29/25 M. Rahat 1340 Anton Square Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24, to permit; • an uncovered platform that may encroach to a maximum of 5.4 metres into the required rear yard setback, whereas the By-law requires a balcony, porch or uncovered platform may encroach into any required setback to a maximum of 2.0 metres or half the distance of the minimum required setback, whichever is less; and • a maximum lot coverage of 57.5 percent, whereas the By-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 40 percent. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application in order to obtain a building permit for an existing deck and attached sunroom. Recommendation For your information, and based solely on the application and supporting documentation filed by the applicant, the City Development Department has reviewed the application with respect to Section 45(1) of the Planning Act and considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By -law. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following condition is recommended: 1. That these variances apply only to the existing deck and attached sunroom, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2). Background The previous homeowner constructed the existing sunroom and deck without the benefit of a Building Permit Application. The requested variances were determined through a zoning review related to a Building Permit application. The current homeowner has submitted Minor Variance Application MV 29/25 to permit the existing site conditions. -26- Report MV 29/25 May 15, 2025 Page 2 Comment General Intent and Purpose of the Official Plan Under the Regional Official Plan, the subject property is designated “Urban System – Community Areas”. The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject site Urban Residential – Low Density within the Liverpool Neighbourhood. Lands within these designations are intended to accommodate residential uses including detached dwellings and associated decks and sunrooms. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan. General Intent and Purpose of the Zoning By-law The subject property is zoned X244 (SD) – Exception Zone 244 under Zoning By-law 8149/24. A detached dwelling along with accessory uses are permitted. The attached sunroom and uncovered deck are both existing. Yard Encroachment The requested variance is to increase the maximum permitted encroachment into the required rear yard setback from 2.0 metres to 5.4 metres. The intent of this provision is to ensure that adequate space is provided for landscaping and private amenity in the rear, while protecting the privacy of abutting properties. The rear yard deck will provide sufficient space on the property left uncovered by buildings to accommodate soft landscaping, storm drainage and outdoor amenity area as the required minimum front and side yard setbacks are maintained. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By -law. Lot Coverage The applicant requests a maximum lot coverage of 57.5 percent, whereas the By-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 40 percent. The intent of this provision is to regulate the size and scale of the buildings and to ensure an adequate amount of space is left uncovered for outdoor amenities. The property retains sufficient outdoor amenity space within the front and rear yard. The requested variance does not appear to adversely affect stormwater runoff, drainage, or the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties. Staff is of the opinion that requ ested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. -27- Report MV 29/25 May 15, 2025 Page 3 Desirable for the Appropriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The requested variances will permit the existing sunroom and associated deck, which is an extension of outdoor amenity space in the rear yard. In addition, the existing deck is approximately half a metre above ground and does not have any significant privacy or overlook concerns. The requested variances are to permit an existing condition which has not generated any significant impact on neighbouring properties. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are desirable for the appropriate development of the land and are minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Applicant •The existing sunroom and deck do not negatively affect neighboring properties and are in keeping with the character of the neighbourhood. Durham Region Community Growth and Economic Development •No comments. Engineering Services •Ensure the projection of the deck in the rear yard and increased lot coverage (if approved with this application) does not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lot and surrounding area. Fire Services •No comments Building Services •Sunroom addition constructed without the benefit of a Building Permit. An Order to Comply has been issued against the owner. A Permit has been submitted and waiting for Committee decision. Public Input •No written submissions have been received from the public as of the date of writing this report. Date of report: May 8, 2025 Comments prepared by: Kerry Yelk Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner II Manager, Zoning & Administration KY:jc /CityDevDept/D3700/2025/MV 29-25/7. Report/MV 29-25 Report.docx Attachments Original Signed By Original Signed by -28- Exhibit 1 \ I - l_ i r I \\ I I Everton Street ~ cu ::::, 0--- Cf) C 0 c I <( Q) ""O I \ C L0 cu \ cu I" 0 \ _J 0::: \ \ I 2:-0 I \ -•._•"" 0 0 \ E e- <111111 Q) Q) ~ .::: I _J I Glendale Park I \ Subject I _\ ~ Lands i I _\ ~\\ \ I Faylee Crescent ,.__o _{1' r--... ~(l) -0~ <Q ( l::- ~O:, ~o r----'-«.'Cl) Glengrove IV Park ~ ~ 04J 6f Location Map File: MV 29/25 PlCKERlNG Applicant: M. Rahat Municipal Address: 1340 Anton Square © Th e Co rporati on of th e C ity of Picke rin g Prod uced (in part) u nder li cense from: Date: Mar. 31, 2025 City Development © Ki ng's Pri nter, Ontario Mi ni stry of Natura l Resources. All rights reserved.;© His Ma jesty the King in Department Rig ht of Ca nada , Department of Natu ra l Resou rces. A ll rig hts reserved .;© Tera net Enterpri ses Inc. and its SCALE : 1:2,000 1 su ppli ers. A ll ri g hts reserved .;© Mun ici pa l Property Assessment Corporati on and its suppli e rs. A ll ri g hts reserved . THIS ISNOTAPLANOF SURVEY. l:\PLANNING\01 -MapFIles\MV\2025\MV 29-25\MV 29-25.aprx -29- Ex h i b i t 2 Su b m i t t e d S i t e P l a n Fi l e N o : MV 2 9 / 2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : M . R a h a t Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 1 3 4 0 A n t o n S q u a r e CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : A p r i l 2 8 , 2 0 2 5 to p e r m i t a n u n c o v e r e d p l a t f o r m t h a t ma y e n c r o a c h t o a m a x i m u m o f 5. 4 m e t r e s i n t o t h e r e q u i r e d r e a r y a r d se t b a c k to p e r m i t a m a x i m u m l o t c o v e r a g e o f 57 . 5 p e r c e n t -30- Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 30/25 Date: May 15, 2025 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Minor Variance Application MV 30/25 T. Sakhi 624 Marksbury Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24 to permit: • a maximum additional dwelling unit height of 5.79 metres, whereas the By-law permits a maximum height of 4.5 metres; and • a maximum dwelling height of 10.52 metres, whereas the By-law permits a maximum height of 9.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain a building permit for the construction of a two-storey detached dwelling, and a three-car garage with a second storey garden suite within the same lot. Recommendation For your information, and based solely on the application for minor variance and supporting documentation filed by the applicant, the City Development Department has reviewed the application with respect to Section 45(1) of the Planning Act and considers the requested variance to permit maximum dwelling height of 10.52 metres to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law; however the requested variance to permit maximum additional dwelling unit height of 5.79 metres is considered not to be minor in nature, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following condition is recommended: 1. That these variances apply only to the two-storey detached dwelling and a three-car garage with a second storey garden suite, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 & 17). -31- Report MV 30/25 May 15, 2025 Page 2 Comment Conforms to the Intent and Purpose of the Official Plan The More Homes Built Faster Act (Bill 23) made changes that removed statutory powers under the Planning Act from certain upper-tier municipalities including Durham Region. As of January 1, 2025, the applicable parts of the Regional Official Plan for Durham are now deemed to be part of Pickering’s Official Plan. In case of conflict, the Regional Official Plan prevails over Pickering’s Official Plan. Under the Regional Official Plan, the subject property is designated “Urban System – Community Areas”. The subject property is designated “Urban Residential Areas – Low Density Area” within the West Shore Neighborhood by the City of Pickering Official Plan. Lands within this designation are intended to accommodate residential uses, including detached dwellings. While the Official Plan does not specify maximum building heights, it provides that performance standards, including height, support neighbourhood compatibility. Staff are of the opinion that the increase in dwelling height maintains the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan. The Official Plan also permits ADUs, including those located in accessory structures, provided they are compatible with the surrounding residential character. While an ADU above a detached garage is permitted in principle, the proposed height increase exceeds the typical scale anticipated for accessory residential structures and may not maintain the low -profile, subordinate character intended in the Plan. Staff are of the opinion that the increase in ADU height does not maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan. General Intent and Purpose of the Zoning By-law The subject property is zoned “R1E” – Residential First Density under Zoning By-law 8149/24, which permits a detached dwelling and additional dwelling units. Maximum Additional Dwelling Unit Height The applicant is requesting a maximum height of 5.79 metres for a detached additional dwelling unit (ADU), whereas the By-law permits a maximum of 4.5 metres. Under the proposed zoning framework, the maximum height of a detached ADU is determined by lot size. Only properties greater than 2,000 square metres are permitted to accommodate ADUs up to 6.5 metres in height. The subject property does not meet this threshold, and the proposed height exceeds the maximum permitted on lots of this size. The height limitations for ADUs are intended to ensure that accessory buildings remain compatible with the scale, massing, and character of low-rise residential neighborhoods, while minimizing potential adverse impacts on neighboring properties. Although the proposed ADU complies with the minimum setback requirements, the additional building height raises concerns related to increased privacy impacts, particularly given the shallow depth of the neighboring rear yard and the presence of a pool located close to the shared rear lot line. Staff are of the opinion that the increased height is not compatible with the existing character of the neighbourhood, does not represent appropriate development of the property, and may negatively impact adjacent properties. As such, the proposed variance does not maintain the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and cannot be supported by staff. -32- Report MV 30/25 May 15, 2025 Page 3 Maximum Dwelling Height The applicant is requesting a maximum dwelling height of 10.52 metres to permit a detached dwelling, whereas the By-law permits a maximum of 9.0 metres. The intent of the height provision is to regulate building scale and minimize potential shadowing and privacy impacts on adjacent properties. Under the Infill By-law, dwelling height is measured as the vertical distance from the average grade along the front wall of the dwelling. The proposed third storey (penthouse) is approximately 55 square metres in area, representing less than 50 percent of the building footprint. The height of the remainder of the dwelling, measured to the top of the parapet, is approximately 8.0 metres. Existing dwellings in the surrounding area range in height from one to three storeys, and the maj ority of the proposed dwelling remains consistent with these built forms. The additional height associated with the third storey is not anticipated to result in adverse impacts to adjacent properties. The proposed dwelling is comparable in size and scale to other homes along Marksbury Road and is expected to integrate well with the existing streetscape. Staff are of the opinion that the increase in dwelling height maintains the general purpose and intent of the By-law. Desirable for the Appropriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The requested variances support the construction of a two-storey detached dwelling and a three-car garage with a second-storey garden suite (ADU) on the subject property. The proposed dwelling height of 10.52 metres is compatible with the surrounding neigh borhood, where homes range from one to three storeys. The design fits well within the streetscape, and the limited third storey is not expected to cause adverse impacts. Staff are of the opinion that this variance is considered desirable and minor in nature. Conversely, the variance for an increased ADU height of 5.79 metres is not supported. The subject lot does not meet the minimum size to warrant the proposed height, and the increase may impact privacy for adjacent properties. As such, staff are of the opinion that this variance is not considered minor or appropriate for the development of the site. Input From Other Sources Applicant • The proposal complies with all applicable By-laws except for the requested variances, as the applicant is proposing to construct a standard single-family dwelling on the property. Engineering Services • Multiple Low Impact Development measures (such as infiltration galleries with downspout connections, rain gardens and 450mm amended soils) will be required at the Building Permit stage. -33- Report MV 30/25 May 15, 2025 Page 4 Durham Region Community Growth and Economic Development •No comments. Building Services •Apply for and obtain a Building Permit prior to commencement of construction. No further comments or concerns. Fire Department •No comments. Public Input •No written submissions were received from the public as of the date of writing this report. Date of report: May 7, 2025 Comments prepared by: Ash Roy, B.URPL Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner I Manager, Zoning & Administration AR:jc /CityDevDept/D3700/2025/MV 30-25/7. Report/Report MV 30-25.docx Attachments Original Signed By Original Signed By -34- I Hillcrest Road I I \r----+-------j \r----~--1 \ \r-----t-----1 Cl) > ·.:::: 0 L----- Exhibit 1 rt--~------1\ 1 \\----'---,------Jr---,___-_ _____,--------jv ~ \\ \ , 1/ ~--r--------<'\ Sunrise Avenue f-----------,,,J Ii_-- ) I 7 /r--r-----,---1 I I I -0 cu 0 0::: ~ ::, ..Q (/) ~ cu ~ Tullo Street Cliffview Road \ \1-------,---------1 i---1-------~\ \------+----I -04;6/- PlCKERlNG City Development Department l:\PLANNING\01 -MapFIles\MV\2025\MV 30-25\MV 30-25.aprx Location Map File: MV 30/25 Applicant: T. Sakhi Municipal Address: 624 Marksbury Road © The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: © King's Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved .;© His Majesty the King in Right of Canada , Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers. All rights reserved.;© Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its suppliers. All rights reserved. ,___ '2 cu > ~ ::, 0 Ill ['----~ 0 .c Cl) U) Cl) ~ s Date: Mar. 31, 2025 SCALE : 1:2,000 THIS ISNOTAPLANOFSURVEY. -35- Exhibit 2 Submitted Existing Site Plan File No: MV 30/25 Applicant: T. Sakhi Municipal Address: 624 Marksbury Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: April 8, 2025 -36- Exhibit 3 Submitted Proposed Site Plan File No: MV 30/25 Applicant: T. Sakhi Municipal Address: 624 Marksbury Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: May 5, 2025 to permit a maximum dwelling height of 10.52 metres to permit a maximum additional dwelling unit height of 5.79 metres -37- Exhibit 4 Submitted Basement Plan File No: MV 30/25 Applicant: T. Sakhi Municipal Address: 624 Marksbury Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: April 8, 2025 -38- Exhibit 5 Submitted First Floor Plan File No: MV 30/25 Applicant: T. Sakhi Municipal Address: 624 Marksbury Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: April 8, 2025 -39- Exhibit 6 Submitted Second Floor Plan File No: MV 30/25 Applicant: T. Sakhi Municipal Address: 624 Marksbury Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: April 8, 2025 -40- Exhibit 7 Submitted Pent House Plan File No: MV 30/25 Applicant: T. Sakhi Municipal Address: 624 Marksbury Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: April 8, 2025 -41- Exhibit 8 Submitted East Elevation Plan (Dwelling) File No: MV 30/25 Applicant: T. Sakhi Municipal Address: 624 Marksbury Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: May 6, 2025 -42- Exhibit 9 Submitted West Elevation Plan (Dwelling) File No: MV 30/25 Applicant: T. Sakhi Municipal Address: 624 Marksbury Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: May 6, 2025 -43- Exhibit 10 Submitted North Elevation Plan (Dwelling) File No: MV 30/25 Applicant: T. Sakhi Municipal Address: 624 Marksbury Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: May 6, 2025 -44- Exhibit 11 Submitted South Elevation Plan (Dwelling) File No: MV 30/25 Applicant: T. Sakhi Municipal Address: 624 Marksbury Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: May 6, 2025 -45- Ex h i b i t 12 Su b m i t t e d F i r s t F l o o r P l a n ( G a r a g e + G a r d e n S u i t e s ) Fi l e N o : MV 30 /2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : T . S a k h i Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 6 2 4 M a r k s b u r y R o a d CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : M a y 5 , 2 0 2 5 -46- Ex h i b i t 13 Su b m i t t e d S e c o n d F l o o r P l a n ( G a r a g e + G a r d e n S u i t e s ) Fi l e N o : MV 3 0 / 2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : T . S a k h i Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 6 2 4 M a r k s b u r y R o a d CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : Ap r i l 8 , 2 0 2 5 -47- Ex h i b i t 14 Su b m i t t e d E a s t E l e v a t i o n P l a n ( G a r a g e + G a r d e n S u i t e s ) Fi l e N o : MV 3 0 / 2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : T . S a k h i Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 6 2 4 M a r k s b u r y R o a d CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : Ma y 5 , 20 2 5 -48- Ex h i b i t 15 Su b m i t t e d W e s t E l e v a t i o n P l a n ( G a r a g e + G a r d e n S u i t e s ) Fi l e N o : MV 3 0 / 2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : T . S a k h i Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 6 2 4 M a r k s b u r y R o a d CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : Ap r i l 8 , 2 0 2 5 -49- Ex h i b i t 16 Su b m i t t e d N o r t h E l e v a t i o n P l a n ( G a r a g e + G a r d e n S u i t e s ) Fi l e N o : MV 3 0 / 2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : T . S a k h i Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 6 2 4 M a r k s b u r y R o a d CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : Ap r i l 8 , 2 0 2 5 -50- Ex h i b i t 17 Su b m i t t e d S o u t h E l e v a t i o n P l a n ( G a r a g e + G a r d e n S u i t e s ) Fi l e N o : MV 3 0 / 2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : T . S a k h i Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 6 2 4 M a r k s b u r y R o a d CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : Ap r i l 8 , 2 0 2 5 -51- Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 31/25 Date: May 15, 2025 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Minor Variance Application MV 31/25 J. Marwaha 1421 Rougemount Drive Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24, to permit: • a minimum rear yard setback for an accessory building containing an additional dwelling unit on lots with an area of 2,000 square metres or less shall be 0.5 of a metre, whereas the By-law requires a minimum rear yard setback for an accessory building containing an additional dwelling unit on lots with an area of 2,000 square metres or less shall be 1.2 metres; and • a minimum side yard setback for an accessory building containing an additional dwelling unit on lots with an area of 2,000 square metres or less shall be 1.1 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum side yard setback for an accessory building containing an additional dwelling unit on lots with an area of 2,000 square metres or less shall be 1.2 metres The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain a building permit for the construction of an Additional Dwelling Unit in an Accessory Structure. Recommendation For your information, and based solely on the application and supporting documentation filed by the applicant, the City Development Department has reviewed the application with respect to Section 45(1) of the Planning Act and considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By -law. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following condition s are recommended: 1. That these variances apply only to the additional residential unit in an accessory structure, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2 & 3). 2. That the existing door along the east-facing (rear) wall of the structure shall not be used as an exit or entrance to the proposed dwelling unit. -52- Report MV 31/25 May 15, 2025 Page 2 Background The accessory building was initially constructed in 2006 as a workshop. In 2022, the subject property was subdivided, with a portion of the rear conveyed into public ownership. The existing workshop is now located next to the rear property line. The new owner is seeking to convert the workshop into an Additional Dwelling Unit. The requested variances were determined through a Building Permit Application zoning review. Comment General Intent and Purpose of the Official Plan Under the Regional Official Plan, the subject property is designated “Urban System – Community Areas”. The subject site is designated Urban Residential Areas – Low Density Area within the Rougemount Neighbourhood under the Pickering Official Plan. The applicant is proposing to convert an existing workshop into an additional dwelling unit. Pickering’s Official Plan Policy 6.7(a) permits one additional dwelling unit within a building accessory to a single detached dwelling. Furthermore, Policy 6.4(e) encourages additional dwelling units in all residential areas, where appropriate, including in accessory buildings. Staff is of the opinion that the variances maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan. General Intent and Purpose of the Zoning By-law The subject property is zoned Exception Zone X207 (R3) – Detached Residential under Zoning By-law 8149/24. A detached dwelling along with two additional dwelling units are permitted on the subject property. Side and Rear Yard Setback for an Accessory Building containing an Additional Dwelling Unit The applicant is requesting a minimum side setback of 1.1 metres and rear yard setback of 0.5 of a metre for an accessory building with an ADU, whereas the By-law requires minimum side yard and rear setbacks of 1.2 metres. The intent of this provision is to regulate an appropriate setback for maintenance of yards and to maintain effective setback for stormwater drainage. The existing accessory building was constructed prior to the adoption of the Additional Dwelling Unit By-law 8035/23. The accessory building previously complied with the setback requirements for accessory buildings under Section 5.19 of By-law 3036, which required a minimum rear yard setback of 1.0 metre. The existing placement of the accessory building has had no negative impacts with respect to stormwater drainage and lot maintenance. Staff is of the opinion that the variance s maintain the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. -53- Report MV 31/25 May 15, 2025 Page 3 Desirable for the Appropriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The requested variances will allow for an accessory building to contain an additional residential unit within the rear yard of the property. The placement and scale of the existing accessory building is in keeping with the character of the neighbourhood. The existing accessory building has remained on the lot for over 20 years with minimal negative impacts on the adjacent properties. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are desirable for the appropriate development of the land and is minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Applicant •The homeowner would like to convert an existing structure into an ADU. Durham Region Planning and Economic Development •No comments. Fire Services •No comments. Engineering Services •Ensure the reduced interior side yard setback and reduced rear yard setback (if approved with this application) does not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lots and surrounding area. Building Services •A building permit has been submitted for this application and is currently on hold awaiting the Committee decision. The current construction would not comply with the Ontario Building Code (OBC), in particular the openings (windows and door) on the east elevation. Public Input •No written submissions have been received from the public as of the date of writing this report. Date of report: May 8, 2025 Comments prepared by: Kerry Yelk Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner II Manager, Zoning & Administration KY:jc CityDevDept/D3700/2025/MV 31-25/7. Report/MV 31-25 Report.doc Attachments Original Signed By Original Signed By -54- Exhibit 1 ______, l-------------1 \ \ (~~ I \\ 1-. I -----c-----f.-----\ -f.-----) -\._'---= \ \ \ ~ I \ \ \ I \ \ \ I ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - \ I ~ \ \ \ \ \ I v--l \ \ \ \ \ \ "'"'~ \ \ 8 '\' \ \ I I \ \ \ \ ~ \ ~ \ \ \"' f---\\ Elizabeth B "" \ "' \ \ \ Phin Public School \ \ \ \ "'t?i \ \ \ I 12i ) "' \ r-- \ I -;;; \ \ Q) Subject 0 J \~.\ I.L I I Lands 'O / ~\ 6 \ I I '/ \ i \ I I ~ I I \ ..A\ I I I,.__ ~ ~ \i. :J I ~ 0 \ \~ () I \ Q) - f---~ > , ... ( ~ ~ ·;:: / 0 To . :g c -. XX"'->. ~x~ - rnt,nson Court ii: '-:J 0 E '1 \ Q) I CJ) :J I 0 I 0::: ~ __L I "O \ C1l 0 0::: \ \ C1l \ C \ .8 <( \ \ I \ I "' I -I; South Petticoat I f------I Ravine I f--- f---I East Woodlands -I / \1 Park l -~ I I I I I \ -r----____ \.__ "' ---- L__/ 0 ~ Rouge Hill Court \~ ~ <>',✓- (S)~ "' y I I I Valley Gate Brookridge Gate 00 O' t ~ I \ <?... .... t-~ -(S) - -'<>c 1Y -" ~ -\_O~~O~ ~ ~ -f.\~~~ / -I I I I '// I I 1 -----\ 04J 6f Location Map File: MV 31/25 PlCKERlNG Applicant: J. Marwaha Municipal Address: 1421 Rouqemount Drive © The Corporation of the C ity of Pickering Produced (in part) under li cense from: Date: Apr. 25, 2025 City Development © King's Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© Hi s Majesty the King in Department Right of Canada , Department of Natural Resources. All rights re served .;© Teranet Enterpri ses Inc. and its SCALE : 1:4,000 1 suppliers. All rights reserved.;© Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its suppliers. All rights re served . THIS ISNOTAPLANOF SURVEY. l:\PLANNING\01-MapFIles\MV\2025\MV 31 -25\MV 31 -25.aprx -55- Ex h i b i t 2 Su b m i t t e d S i t e P l a n Fi l e N o : MV 3 1 / 2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : J . M a r w a h a Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 1 4 2 1 R o u g e m o u n t D r i v e CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : A p r i l 2 8 , 2 0 2 5 to p e r m i t a m i n i m u m r e a r y a r d se t b a c k o f 0 . 5 m e t r e s to p e r m i t a m i n i m u m i n t e r i o r s i d e ya r d s e t b a c k o f 1 . 1 m e t r e s -56- Ex h i b i t 3 Su b m i t t e d E l e v a t i o n s Fi l e N o : MV 3 1 / 2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : J . M a r w a h a Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 1 4 2 1 R o u g e m o u n t D r i v e CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : A p r i l 2 8 , 2 0 2 5 -57- Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 32/25 Date: May 15, 2025 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Minor Variance Application MV 32/25 C. Antonakes 1848 Appleview Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24 to permit: • a maximum accessory structure height of 4.0 metres, whereas the By-law permits a maximum height of 3.5 metres; and • a maximum accessory structure lot coverage of 6.5 percent, whereas the By-law permits a maximum of 5 percent. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain a building permit for the construction a pavilion. Recommendation For your information, and based solely on the application and supporting documentation filed by the applicant, the City Development Department has reviewed the application with respect to Section 45(1) of the Planning Act and considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following condition is recommended: 1. That these variances apply only to the pavilion, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3 & 4). Background A previous Minor Variance application was submitted for the subject property and heard by the Committee of Adjustment on March 12, 2025. The application included variances for both the principal dwelling and an accessory structure. While the Committee approved the variances related to the dwelling, it refused the variances requested for the accessory structure, which sought to permit a maximum accessory structure height of 4.1 metres and a maximum accessory structure lot coverage of 7 percent. No appeals were filed following the Committee’s decision. The current application seeks revised variances for the accessory structure only, specifically to permit the construction of a pavilion in the rear yard. -58- Report MV 32/25 May 15, 2025 Page 2 Comment Conforms to the Intent and Purpose of the Official Plan The More Homes Built Faster Act (Bill 23) made changes that removed statutory powers under the Planning Act from certain upper-tier municipalities including Durham Region. As of January 1, 2025, the applicable parts of the Regional Official Plan for Durham are now deemed to be part of Pickering’s Official Plan. In case of conflict, the Regional Official Plan prevails over Pickering’s Official Plan. Under the Regional Official Plan, the subject property is designated “Urban System – Community Areas”. The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject property “Urban Residential Areas – Low Density Area” and “Open Space System – Natural Areas”. The proposed development is located within the Low Density Area, which is intended to accommodate residential uses, including accessory structures. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan. General Intent and Purpose of the Zoning By-law The subject property is zoned “R1D” – Residential First Density under Zoning By-law 8149/24, which permits accessory structures. The applicant is requesting a maximum accessory structure height of 4.0 metres, whereas the Zoning By-law permits a maximum height of 3.5 metres, and a maximum lot coverage of 6.5 percent, whereas the By-law permits a maximum of 5 percent. The intent of these provisions is to regulate the scale and size of accessory structures to minimize potential impacts such as shadowing, overlooking, and excessive coverage that could limit outdoor amenity space. While the proposed height exceeds the permitted maximum, the structure is not anticipated to negatively impact adjacent properties, as existing vegetation will be maintained to mitigate visual and shadowing concerns. Similarly, the increase in lot coverage is not expected to result in adverse effects on stormwater management, drainage, or the overall use and enjoyment of neighboring properties. However, as the proposed pavilion exceeds the maximum permitted lot coverage for accessory structures, no additional accessory structures will be permitted in the future. The property retains sufficient outdoor amenity space within the front and rear yards, ensuring that the site remains functional and consistent with surrounding development patterns. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances maintain the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Desirable for the Appropriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The proposed variances will enable the construction of a pavilion that enhances the property's outdoor amenity space while maintaining a functional and visually compatible layout. The modest increase in height and lot coverage is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on adjacent properties due to existing vegetation and sufficient setbacks. The site continues to provide ample open space, and the design remains in keeping with the character of the surrounding area. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are desirable for the appropriate development of the land and are minor in nature. -59- Report MV 32/25 May 15, 2025 Page 3 Input From Other Sources Applicant •The applicant asserts that the requested minor variances are minor in nature and consistent with the newer developments on the street. Engineering Services •Ensure the increased maximum lot coverage (if approved with this application) does not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lot and surrounding area. Durham Region Community Growth and Economic Development •No comments. Building Services •Apply for and obtain a Building Permit prior to commencement of construction. No further comments or concerns. Fire Department •No comments. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority • TRCA has no objections to the approval of the Minor Variance Application, as the proposed development is outside the regulated portions of the property and does not require a permit. Public Input •No written submissions have been received from the public as of the date of writing this report. Date of report: May 7, 2025 Comments prepared by: Ash Roy, B.URPL Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner I Manager, Zoning & Administration AR:nr /CityDevDept/D3700/2025/MV 07-25/7. Report/Report March 12/MV 07-25.docx Attachments Original Signed By Original Signed By -60- Strouds Lane -04;6/- PlCKERlNG City Development Department C:\Users\danielmensah\Downloads\Downloads\Downloads.aprx Subject Lands I Dalewood----\-------J 1--------"' Ravine 1------\------j Location Ma File: MV 32/25 Munici al Address: 1848 Appleview Road © The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: © King's Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© His Majesty the King in Right of Canada , Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers. All rights reserved.;© Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its suppliers. All rights reserved. William Dunbar Public School Exhibit 1 L-_r-----, Q) t===r====l·E: 1---1----j 0 Date: Apr. 02, 2025 SCALE : 1:5,000 THIS ISNOTAPLANOFSURVEY. -61- Ex h i b i t 2 Su b m i t t e d S i t e P l a n Fi l e N o : MV 32 /2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : C. A n t o n a k e s Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 1 8 4 8 A p p l e v i e w R o a d CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : A p r i l 8 , 2 0 2 5 to p e r m i t a m a x i m u m ac c e s s o r y s t r u c t u r e he i g h t o f 4 . 0 m e t r e s to p e r m i t a m a x i m u m ac c e s s o r y s t r u c t u r e l o t co v e r a g e o f 6 . 5 p e r c e n t -62- Exhibit 3 Submitted Pavilion Floor Plan File No: MV 32/25 Applicant: C. Antonakes Municipal Address: 1848 Appleview Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: April 8, 2025 -63- Ex h i b i t 4 Su b m i t t e d P a v i l i o n E l e v a t i o n P l a n s Fi l e N o : MV 32 /2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : C. A n t o n a k e s Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 1 8 4 8 A p p l e v i e w R o a d CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : A p r i l 8 , 20 2 5 -64- Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 34/25 Date: May 15, 2025 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Minor Variance Applications MV 34/25 M. Memon 2169 Saffron Avenue Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24, to permit a minimum parking requirement of 2.0 spaces in total, whereas the By-law requires a minimum of 2.0 parking spaces for a detached dwelling, plus 1.0 additional space for an Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU), for a total requirement of 3.0 parking spaces. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain a building permit to construct a basement additional dwelling unit. Recommendation For your information, and based solely on the Application for Minor Variance and supporting documentation filed by the applicant, the City Development Department has reviewed the application with respect to Section 45(1) of the Planning Act and considers the requested variance to not be minor in nature, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following condition is recommended: 1.That this variance applies only to the detached dwelling and additional dwelling unit, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2 & 3). Background The applicant has submitted plans as part of a building permit application which include the addition of an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). As part of the submission, the applicant proposes the addition of one off-street parking space to be located on the municipal boulevard fronting the subject property. The rationale provided is that the existing driveway and attached garage do not have sufficient capacity to accommodate an additional vehicle. The proposed boulevard parking space does not comply with the requirements of Zoning By- law 8149/24, which governs legal parking provisions on private property. While such a space may be permitted under the City of Pickering Traffic and Parking By-law for the purposes of temporary on-street parking, it does not constitute a legal parking space for zoning compliance purposes. -65- Report MV 34/25 May 15, 2025 Page 2 Furthermore, the applicant proposed the conversion of an existing sod-covered boulevard area, to asphalt to accommodate the additional parking space. This modification is not permissible, as the boulevard is municipal property and falls outside the boundaries of the subject lands. The subject property is located approximately 4-minute walking distance from the nearest public transit stop at Brock Road and Major Oaks Road. This stop is served by Durham Region Transit Route 916, which operates at a 20-minute headway and provides access to the Pickering Parkway Terminal. From there, passengers may transfer to additional local and regional transit services, including GO Transit bus and train routes. In terms of educational facilities, the subject property is approximately: •11-minute walking distance from École élémentaire Ronald-Marion (French public school); •4-minute walking distance from Brock Elementary Islamic School; and •21-minute walking distance from the nearest Durham District School Board public elementary school. The nearest full-service grocery store is located approximately 17-minute walking distance from the subject property. Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan As of January 1, 2025, following changes made by More Homes Built Faster Act (Bill 23), applicable parts of the Durham Regional Official Plan are now deemed to be part of Pickering’s Official Plan. Under the Regional Plan, the subject property is designated 'Urban System – Community Areas'. The subject property is designated “Urban Residential Areas – Medium Density Area” by the City of Pickering Official Plan. Lands within this designation are intended to accommodate residential uses including detached dwellings and additional dwelling units. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan. Does not conform to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The subject property is zoned “X120” (S4-11) – Exception Zone 120 under Zoning By-law 8149/24. -66- Report MV 34/25 May 15, 2025 Page 3 The applicant is seeking relief from the requirements of Section 5.2 of Zoning By-law 8149/24, which specifies that a detached dwelling containing an Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU) must provide a minimum of three off-street parking spaces. This requirement comprises two spaces for the principal dwelling and one space for the ADU. The current proposal provides a total of two off-street parking spaces, with no additional space allocated to serve the ADU. The parking requirement under Section 5.2 is intended to ensure that residential properties provide sufficient on-site parking to accommodate occupants, particularly in areas where alternative modes of transportation may be limited or insufficient. The absence of an additional parking space for the ADU with no alternatives conflicts with this requirement and does not satisfy the intent of the by-law. Not Desirable for the Appropriate Development of the Land and Not Minor in Nature The applicant is of the opinion that the proposed plan to utilize a portion of the municipal boulevard is sufficient to accommodate the additional space, the dimensions of the boulevard are inadequate for this purpose. Furthermore, as outlined previously, the boulevard is municipal property and cannot be legally altered. Pursuant to the City of Pickering Traffic and Parking By-law, on-street parking is prohibited for a duration exceeding three hours and entirely prohibited between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. during designated winter months. These restrictions further limit the viability of boulevard or street-based parking as an alternate solution for parking accommodation. Although the subject property is located within walking distance of a local transit stop served by Durham Region Transit Route 916, the service operates on a 20-minute headway and offers limited coverage in terms of destinations and frequency. As such, reliance on transit as a primary mode of transportation may not adequately support the daily mobility needs of occupants of the ADU. Moreover, Brock Road lacks dedicated cycling infrastructure. The absence of bicycle lanes creates a safety concern and presents a barrier to active transportation, further limiting modal options. As a result, walking becomes the primary alternative to driving, which may not be feasible for all household types or travel purposes. The inability to provide the required parking for the ADU may impact nearby on-street parking resources or limit the mobility of future occupants, particularly in the absence of frequent transit service and safe active transportation infrastructure. As such, the proposed variance is not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land and is not minor in nature, given the potential for adverse impacts on the surrounding area if the ADU tenant possesses a personal vehicle and is unable to secure legal parking. -67- Report MV 34/25 May 15, 2025 Page 4 Input From Other Sources Applicant •Additional parking space is available; however, the boulevard parking is not considered legal parking, and measurements for additional parking are deficient according to by-law. Regional Community Growth and Economic Development •No comments. Fire Services •No comments. Building Services •No concerns. Permit application is on hold until the Committee’s decision. Public Input •As of the date of writing this report, no written submission has been received from the public. Date of report: May 8, 2025 Comments prepared by: Figo Pham Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Zoning Technician Manager, Zoning & Administration FP:nr /CityDevDept/D3700/2025/MV 34-25/7. Report/MV 34-25 Report.doc Attachments Original Signed By Original Signed By -68- C ro --,_-LI_,__----l E 1---HY----r----J Q) ~._._L_J.-...., 2 L.J.--'----'-~ EEP onald-Marion Subject 1.-----r------Lands --~---==- r----i1------' C >, -._____, Q) r----,_ _ __J ro-u ,----,_ _ __J s -~ r----il--__J C 1--------<f-----< (.) ,-----------,1--__, _8 ,-----,1-------i C ,---,1--__, ro -a> r----il--__J Q) Q) r----ic___J c:o -~ - Brockridge Community Park 1------1'---1(}. ""O ro 0 0:: -"' u e c:o vi.c :3 • VJ a>! 3 121 Ql ;;j 0 ~-~ f<!j Ql 0. Jade Street ( Location Ma File: MV 34/25 I ""O rol---+----1 &_1---+----1 Qil---+---1 31---+---I 01----+----1 ~l---+----1 :J I---+---! (/)l---+---1 -04;6/- PlCKERlNG Munici al Address: 2169 Saffron Drive © Th e Co rp orati on of th e C ity of Pi c ke rin g Pro du ce d (in part ) und er li cense fro m: © Ki ng's Printer, Ontario Mini stry of Natu ra l Resou rces. All rig hts reserved.;© Hi s Ma jesty th e Ki ng in i i i i i i i i i i City Development Department Ri g ht of Ca nada , Departme nt of Natura l Resources. A ll ri g hts re served.;© Te ra net Enterpri ses Inc . and its su ppliers. A ll ri g hts reserved.;© Municipa l Pro perty Assessme nt Corporati on and its supplie rs. All ri g hts reserved. l:\PLANNING\01 -MapFiles\MV\2025\MV 34-25\MV 34-25\MV 34-25.aprx Exhibit 1 Date: Apr. 09, 2025 SCALE : 1:5,000 THIS ISNOTAPLANOFSURVEY. -69- Ex h i b i t 2 Su b m i t t e d S i t e P l a n Fi l e N o : MV 3 4 /2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : M . M e m o n Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 21 6 9 S a f f r o n Dr iv e CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : A p r i l 2 8 , 2 0 2 5 to p e r m i t 0 a d d i t i o n a l pa r k i n g f o r a d d i t i o n a l dw e l l i n g u n i t . -70- Ex h i b i t 3 Su b m i t t e d B a s e m e n t F l o o r P l a n Fi l e N o : MV 3 4 /2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : M . M e m o n Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 21 6 9 S a f f r o n Dr iv e CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : A p r i l 2 8 , 2 0 2 5 -71-