Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutInformation Report 18-11Citr.� Information Report �i ReportNumber: 18-11 For.Public Information Meeting of PICKERING Date: October 3, 2011 In Accordance with the Public Meeting Requirements of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13 Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision Application SP -2011-02 Draft Plan of Condominium Application CP -2011-02 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 12/11 Maddy Development Inc. 1290 & 1292 Old Orchard Avenue (Lot 8, and Part of Lots 7 & 9 Plan 432) City of Pickering 1.0 Property Location and Description • the subject lands are located on the north side of Old Orchard Avenue, between .Liverpool Road and Douglas Avenue (see Location Map — Attachment #1) • the subject lands consist of two large residential lots with a total area of approximately 0.66 hectares • the subject lands are currently occupied with one detached dwelling and accessory structure and a temporary sales trailer • a number of mature trees are situated on the lands • surrounding land uses are: north detached dwellings fronting Haller Avenue south - detached dwellings across Old Orchard Avenue east - a detached dwelling fronting Old Orchard Avenue and a commercial property and detached dwellings fronting Liverpool Road west detached dwellings fronting Old Orchard Avenue and Douglas Avenue 2.0 Applicant's Proposal • the applicant is proposing to develop the subject property with 16 lots having a minimum lot frontage of 11.0 metres, with four lots fronting Old Orchard Avenue and 12 lots fronting an internal private common element condominium road (see Attachments #2 & #3) • the private road has access from Old Orchard Avenue • all of the lots are proposed to be developed with two storey detached dwellings with two car garages • the proposal is similar to a traditional condominium development that received zoning approval in October 2004 and site plan approval in July 2007 but was not pursued 01 Information Report No. 18-11 Page 2 02 • an application for draft plan of subdivision has been submitted in order to create a single block on a registered plan so that the individual lots can be created through part lot control • the application for approval of a draft plan of common element condominium is required for the private road and other common element features (e.g., visitor parking and community mail box) • the zoning by-law amendment application proposes performance standards that would reflect the proposed lots and dwelling siting • an associated site plan application has also been submitted 3.0 Official Plan and Zoning 3.1 Durham Regional Official Plan the Regional Plan designates the subject property as "Living Areas" the predominant use of lands in this designation is to be housing, but limited retailing of goods and services in appropriate locations may also be permitted the applicant's proposal appears to meet the intent of the Durham Regional Official Plan 3.2 Pickering Official Plan • the subject lands are designated "Urban Residential Area — Low Density Area" which permits residential uses, including detached dwelling units, at a density of up to and including 30 units per net hectare • the proposed development would provide a net site density of approximately 24 units per hectare • the subject property is within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood of the Official Plan • Schedule II - Transportation Systems designates Old Orchard Avenue as a "Local Road" 3.3 Zoning By-law 2511 the subject lands are currently zoned WD -S -SD" by Zoning By-law 2511 which permits a maximum of 16 detached or semi-detached dwellings on the property this zoning by-law was the result of a'Council approval in 2004 (By-law 6375/04) to permit a similar proposal while the existing zoning permits the 16 proposed lots, the proposed development does not comply with some of the existing performance standards, particularly the minimum building setbacks from the east, west and south limits of the property, and therefore an amendment to the by-law is required Information Report No. 18-11 Page 3 4.0 Results of Circulation 03 4.1 Resident Comments • three residents have requested information but have not submitted any comments 4.2 Agency Comments • none received in response to the circulation to date 4.3 City Department Comments • none received in response to the circulation to date 4.4 Staff Comments the following matters have been identified by staff for further review and consideration: • ensuring that the proposed development is compatible with and sensitive to the existing surrounding neighbourhood • reviewing the site plan to ensure appropriate site layout, building design and landscaping design, including appropriate lotting, building setbacks, tree preservation, and the provision of adequate visitor parking • ensuring the remaining lot to the east can be redeveloped in the future • consistency with the City's urban design objectives • proposed sustainable development components • compliance of submitted studies/plans with City standards 5.0 Procedural Information • written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning & Development Department • oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting • all comments received will be noted and used as input to a Planning Report prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Council or a Committee of Council • any member of the public who wishes to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law or approves the draft plan of subdivision or draft plan of condominium for this proposal • any member of the public who wishes to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal must request such in writing to the City Clerk Information Report No. 18-11 6.0 Other Information 6.1 Appendix No. I Page 4 • list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies.and City Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing this report 6.2 Information Received • full scale copies of the plans and studies listed below are available for viewing at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department: • Applicant's Submitted Plan • Planning Rationale and Sustainability Report • Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment 6.3 Owner/Applicant Information • the owner of the subject lands is Maddy Development Inc. • Michael Delli Benedetti, a principal of Maddy Development Inc., is the applicant /\ G✓3/>80�� Ross Pym, MCIPLAPP Principal Planner — Development Review RP:ld Attachments Copy: Director, Planning & Development Marg outers, MCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review & Urban Design Appendix No. I to Information Report No. 18-11 Commenting Residents and Landowners (1) none received to date Commenting Agencies (1) none received to date Commenting City Departments (1) none received to date 05 ATTACHMENT#1 .'ilii 06 INFUitMX(IUNREPORr# MARTIN'S DOUGLAS PARK I:IYUMYRIII[e] FRENCHMANS BAY )zx OLD O z O z Z Q BOULEVARD AVEN m HOLY w REDEEMERo SEPARATE STREET PARK DRIVE City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot B, Pt. Lot 7 & 9, Plan 432 OWNER Maddy Development Inc. DATE Aug 31,N11 DRAWN BY IB FILE No. SP -2011-02, CPV -2011-02, A 12/11 SCALE 1:5,000 CHECKED BY RP H aT—n.tP t ,H Its In.. II nIt All rl 11— �.ry i�Not.... Ion N,t5, Allan of ..rv.,. PN -3 U) J 0 D O 0 ATTACHMENT10J.._.10 �B-t` INFG RFamo INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S O SUBMITTED SITE PLAN MADDY DEVELOPMENT INC. SP -2011-02 & CP -2011-02 & A 12/11 f a S LV.9ES O mFAPPLYAV/Y SY/BYTID MAN ARE AVAHA%E r NMAr INE G/r LY AG:ERMG P(ANNC/C & OELE20.^NFNr OFPAH/!/EN/. M4S I(IP WAS PN00l.Yf0 Bl INf GlY OF P/LKfR/NC PUNNWC & OE4EZP^Y£M L'£pAflYENf, mvaeuuroN & rurMxr smv0E1 uvr r, torr.. mrol Ld Ld F— V) V) cn J 0 0 Q P`� 6TTACHMENT# a FO >+'"itR4,tiA1'ION REPORT#,d1 INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED CONDOMINIUM PLAN MAODY DEVELOPMENT INC. SP -2011-02 & CP -2011-02 & A 12/11 R E C1 15 lI E R IE D I I P L IA N I ml - 1 6 PMT" I PMTU I PM a I PMT, I PMT" I MTS I PAR. I PMT Y E%Ifi IMO gE610 FN TIAL N}b Poll 0�G5 0 L D O R C H A R D A V E N U E RRLL( Sf1lE [OPkS CY 1H£ MPYCNTS susumm PLW ME APNUN(E Ene RnWnc Ar INE C/IY OF P2%ERs.G P(AM:WO tr OELECOPYEM'OEPARIY£M. RNS /lN WAS P.PoOLCm 6l INE LT' OF PIGYEAM'C Iq] trl SUPAJFrSE.R%'£S SEPT !. 1011. PMT PW - T—T P -r I -T -j 0 L D O R C H A R D A V E N U E RRLL( Sf1lE [OPkS CY 1H£ MPYCNTS susumm PLW ME APNUN(E Ene RnWnc Ar INE C/IY OF P2%ERs.G P(AM:WO tr OELECOPYEM'OEPARIY£M. RNS /lN WAS P.PoOLCm 6l INE LT' OF PIGYEAM'C Iq] trl SUPAJFrSE.R%'£S SEPT !. 1011.