Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDiscussion Paper - Focus Group PMV Strategic PlanDiscussion Paper – Heritage Pickering March 22, 2017 4.1) Pickering Museum Strategic Plan Input K. Pyke appeared before the Committee to provide an overview of the Pickering Museum Village Strategic Plan. She noted the last one was completed in 2015, and they are now in the process of developing a new one, with plans to develop every four years in order to coincide with the term of Council. She also stated they are looking at overlaps with various focus groups as well obtaining public input. K. Pyke referred to the packages which had been forwarded to members electronically, which outlines everything going on in the City, and will be used to help determine the future needs of the Museum, as well as bringing people together. K. Pyke canvassed the members for input on a number of categories as follows: Have you visited the Museum and if so, what were your experiences participated in a cooking class As Committee members, what do you see as an overlap in your role? the Committee could work with the Museum on saving historical properties at risk with the 407 and ensuing development taking place people’s perception in having a Museum, why the need to preserve anything else communication - more promotional work with Museum What do you think the role of a community Museum should be? Education Opportunity to experience historical as well as entertainment value Integration of new residents as Seaton grows What community needs can a Museum provide? Identity Civic pride K. Pyke noted that the City is taking on an assessment of all buildings to determine the reality of maintaining certain structures or combining. She noted the City is now realizing a responsibility to better manage how buildings are used. Discussion ensued with respect to the services being provided in some of the older buildings, what to do with them, and if the Museum could be a part of that. Comments were noted as follows: costs involved with maintenance the need to comply with accessibility the lack of ability to retrofit older buildings the drop in usage being on septic no security K. Pyke noted that City owned buildings are very regulated in their permitting system, noting the liability and cost issues with smaller northern ones not regulated by the City, and whether it makes sense to continue their operation. K. Pyke stated that the Museum is looking to expand over the next ten years, as they are currently experiencing a serious lack of storage space. She questioned members on alternative solutions for these smaller buildings if not viable. Comments are noted as follows; Could smaller buildings be incorporated at Museum? Incorporate community usage Display/meeting space Live performances Special events Incorporate diverse groups in one large entity Multi-functional Retain old buildings K. Pyke outlined the strengths and weaknesses in the appendix to the document provided and canvassed members for their input on any additions to the list, with comments being noted as follows; Like to see a wider web presence Utilize technology advances Like to see a working museum where items can be made and sold Revenue generating opportunities such as a restaurant on site or a brewery as done in other Museums Accessible year round K. Pyke asked members what opportunities are not being capitalized on, and how success can be achieved over the next 6 years. Members commented as follows; Create a new mandate with the new building? First Nations is a missing part – would need to partner Need to partner with various cultural groups Expand on being more than a pioneer village, as new cultures arrive Public transportation is a key issue, residents need access to transportation to get to the Museum K. Pyke passed around a sheet of the Museum’s draft governing statements which outlines their vision, mission and values, and encouraged members to continue to provide input. Discussion ensued with respect to improving on the wording used, and suggestions were noted as follows; What are we inspiring visitors to do, such as being more connected to their community? Do not use “story of Pickering” – replace with “What is now known as the Pickering area” Wording to describe Museum: Custodians of artifacts Truthful Inclusive Natural setting Members also felt the Museum should stay on top of advancements in Museum studies. In Closing, K. Pyke thanked members for their input, and noted that updates could be found on the City’s website. She encouraged members to continue to provide their input, as they truly value all comments.