Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFIN 22-17DICKERING Report to Executive Committee Report Number: FIN 22-17 Date: November 6, 2017 From: Stan Karwowski Director, Finance & Treasurer Subject: Statutory Public Meeting Regarding Proposed 2017 Development Charge By-law and Background Study Recommendation: 1. That Report FIN 22-17 of the Director, Finance & Treasurer be received; 2. That Council receive for information the City of Pickering — Development Charges Background Study prepared by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. dated October 5, 2017; 3. That all written submissions made at the November 6th Public Meeting or received in writing from the public by November 17th be referred to staff and to Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. for consideration in preparation of the final Development Charge recommendations and By-law for Council's consideration on December 11th; and, 4. That the appropriate City officials be authorized to take the actions necessary to implement these recommendations. Executive Summary: Pickering needs to continue implementing development charges to fund capital projects related to growth throughout the City so that development pays for its capital requirements to the full extent allowed by the Development Charges Act (the "DC Act") and so that the new services required by growth are provided in a fiscally responsible manner. Without development charge ("DC") funding, the financial responsibility of paying for growth -related capital projects would be borne by existing taxpayers. The City collects development charges from new construction to pay for growth -related capital costs. The City's current Development Charges By-law expires on December 9, 2018, however, with the City now entering a high growth phase (due partially to Seaton), it would be beneficial to update the By-law now, in order to reflect current construction costs and up-to-date capital strategies. The new DC Background Study has been prepared pursuant to the DC Act to update the previous DC By-law The purpose of this Report HN 22-17 November 6, 2017 Subject: Statutory Public Meeting Regarding Proposed 2017 Development Page 2 Charge By-law and Background Study Report is to present the 2017 DC Background Study and proposed By-law for consideration at a statutory public meeting, as required by the DC Act. The DC rates set out in the Background Study are calculated on a cost recovery basis and represent what is allowed under the DC Act. The change from current rates is the result of revised growth forecasts and updated capital programs. The proposed decrease of the Seaton residential DC is 7.5% or $632 for a single detached unit. For the rest of Pickering, a single detached unit is proposed to increase by 1.77% or $250 for a single semi-detached unit. The new DC rate on a detached residential unit would continue to result in Pickering having one of the lowest DC rate of all the GTA municipalities. Pickering's new DC rate continues to be lower than those of Whitby, Oshawa, and Ajax. The proposed DC Background Study incorporates the principles of the Seaton Financial Impacts Agreement (the "FIA") approved by Council on October 28, 2013. The FIA requires the Seaton landowners to pay the City-wide DC for all services except transportation services. The Seaton landowners will be funding and building their own local roads and, therefore, are not subject to the transportation charge applicable to the rest of Pickering. After the statutory public meeting, it is proposed that staff review the submissions received from the public. Staff will bring forward a final report with a proposed DC By- law for Council's consideration at the December 11th Council meeting. The new Development Charge By-law will, if passed by Council, be effective on January 1, 2018. Financial Implications: The proposed DC background study includes a gross capital program of $453.4 million of which $301.5 million is to be recovered from DC's. The residual amount of $151.9 million is more commonly referred to as "City Share" and this dollar amount will be funded from property taxes, senior level grant funding (such as Federal Gas Tax) or debt. The "City Share" funds the 10% statutory deduction for soft services, the "benefit to existing" deduction and the post -period benefit. The DC Act requires municipalities to reduce the growth -related net capital costs associated with "soft services" by 10%. (Soft services include services such as recreation, parks and libraries). Additional infrastructure that is to be put in place, that will provide benefits to the existing population, must also be funded from a source other than DC's. This is commonly known as the "benefit to existing" reduction. Typically, these reductions are funded through the property tax base. Some of the infrastructure that is planned to be built within the DC By-law will serve future population and employment-related growth beyond the life of this study and therefore, some of the capital project's cost will be allocated to future studies. This allocation of cost to future year is referred to as "post period benefit". Some of the Seaton -related capital projects Report FIN 22-17 November 6, 2017 Subject: Statutory Public Meeting Regarding Proposed 2017 Development Page 3 Charge By-law and Background Study may reflect this deduction. In the interim, these costs will be funded by the City and then recovered through the next DC Study planned for 2021. Discussion: In simplest terms, DC rates are calculated as follows: Growth -Related New Capital Costs Growth Forecast (Population) Growth -Related Capital Program The 2013 DC study capital forecast included the Seaton FIA. The FIA exempts the Seaton Development Area from the transportation component of the City-wide DC until Seaton has reached certain development targets as specified in the FIA. (It is anticipated that the Seaton landowners will reach these targets by 2031). This results in a lower overall DC rate for Seaton as compared to the rest of Pickering. The DC Capital program was developed by staff from all departments. Staff first reviewed the 2013 DC study and removed projects that have been completed; then the timing and costs of projects that had not been completed were updated in the context of the new growth forecast or new/improved information that is now available. Lastly, projects were added to the program that are required to service the additional growth included in the 2017 Background Study. In the 2017 DC Background Study, some adjustments have been made to the service categories in order to better reflect our current growth -related needs. The "Operations Services" category will be re -allocated to a new category "Other Services Related to a Highway" and to "Parks & Recreation Services". The "Protective Services" category has been expanded to include By-law & Animal Enforcement Services. Historically, the "Protective Services" category only included fire protection, However, Finance staff, working with the consultant, explored the opportunity of adding new services and their corresponding capital programs for DC funding under this category. The benefit of this change is that an animal shelter is now included in the Study with vehicles related to both By-law and Animal Services. Table One shows that the DC Eligible Costs in the 2017 Study have increased by 37.3% from the 2013 study. Table One Comparison of DC Funding Sources Gross Capital Costs Less: DC Eligible Costs Net City Share 2013 Study ($M) 352.1 (219.5) 132.6 2017 Study ($M) 453.4 (30t5) 151.9 Change % 28.7 37.3 14.5 Report FIN 22-17 November 6, 2017 Subject: Statutory Public Meeting Regarding Proposed 2017 Development Page 4 Charge By-law and Background Study The City share dollar amount of $151.9 million will be funded through property taxes, debt and senior level government grants such as Federal Gas Tax. The City's current economic strategy focusing on industrial and commercial growth (taxation revenue) will assist the City in meeting its future growth related financial obligations. Comparison of DC Funding Sources 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 2013 DC Study 2017 DC Study ® Growth Funded (DC Charges) City Share As the above chart indicates, there has been a shift between funding sources, taxpayer to DC charges resulting in savings of approximately $19.0 million. Growth Forecast The DC growth forecast has been derived from the forecast contained in Durham Region Regional Official Plan Amendment No. 128, as approved by the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) on January 9, 2013. Each service is either based on a 10 -year planning period (Protection Services, Parks and Recreation, Library, and Administration Studies) or until 2031 (Other Services Related to a Highway, Stormwater Management and Transportation). The following table compares the growth forecast in the 2013 Study and the 2017 Study: 2013 Study 2017 Study % Change Population 10 -year 52,720 78,450 48.8% To 2031 87,720 91,746 4.6% Employment 10 -year 15,210 21,121 38.8% To 2031 26,200 31,326 19.6% Report FEN 22-17 November 6, 2017 Subject: Statutory Public Meeting Regarding Proposed 2017 Development Page 5 Charge By-law and Background Study The 2017 growth forecast is higher mainly due to the commencement of Seaton development being delayed. The growth originally forecasted to occur from 2014-2017 that did not occur is now being included in the 2018-2027 forecast, in addition to the growth previously forecasted for the same period. In other words, part of the (2014- 2017) growth is being "pushed" into the (2018-2027) period resulting in higher population figures. Pickering Proposed DC Rates A comparison of the DC rates by component between current and proposed January 1, 2018 is presented below. Single and Semi Detached Residential Rate Comparison of Current Rates to Proposed Rates Service Current (Indexed) Proposed Jan. 1/18 Change* (Increase) Decrease) Municipal Wide Services: Other Services Related to a Highway** $441 Operations Services** $614 Protection Services (Fire, By-law &889 Animal Services) Fire Protection*** 664 ' Parks and Recreation Services 5,637 4,851 Library Services 916 1,086 Administration Studies 202 277 Stormwater Management 431 288 Total Municipal Wide Services (Line A) $8,464 $7,832 Outside of Seaton Lands Transportation 5,635 6,517 Total Outside of Seaton Lands (Line B) $5,635 $6,517 Rest of Pickering (Line A+B) $14,099 $14,349 250 Seaton**** $8,464 $7,832 (632) * Comparisons of each service cannot be made due to the adjustments of the service categories between studies. ** Vehicles and facilities previously included under "Operations Services" have been included in "Other Services related to a Highway" and "Parks and Recreation Services" to better reflect the services provided. *** Protection services included in the broader costs of protective and enforcement services, including Fire Protection Services and funding for Animal and By-law Services. **** Excludes the cost of Seaton internal roads network and voluntary contributions under the FIA. Report FIN 22-17 November 6, 2017 Subject: Statutory Public Meeting Regarding Proposed 2017 Development Page 6 Charge By-law and Background Study When Council approved the Seaton FIA, City staff successfully negotiated an additional financial contribution of $16.0 million from the Seaton landowners. This amount is collected through an additional charge that is paid along with the Seaton DC. For a Seaton single detached home, an additional $1,266 is charged. Therefore, a Seaton developer is paying $9,098 ($7,832 + $1,266) for a single semi-detached dwelling plus road construction costs. There are a number of factors influencing the change in the DC rate for residential single and semi-detached dwelling units, including: • total DC recoverable costs over the 10 -year forecast period; • forecast growth in incremental gross population over the 10 -year period; and • the change in average occupancy per dwelling unit persons per unit (PPU) between Census periods. For the single and semi-detached category, there was a decrease of $786 or 13.9% for the Parks and Recreation DC rate between the 2017 and 2013 DC Background Study. The decrease is due to the following factors: • DC recoverable costs for the 10 -year forecast period increased by approximately 2%; • The PPU for single and semi-detached dwelling units increased by approximately 1%; • The incremental 10 -year gross population increased by approximately 39%; • The increase in DC recoverable costs and occupancy place upward pressure on the DC rate. However, the higher number of housing units forecast to be constructed over the 10 -year forecast period, and related population growth, more than offset the increase in DC recoverable costs and occupancy; The Seaton residential rate decreased by $632 or 7.5% due to the growth forecast increasing at a greater percentage than the DC eligible capital costs. Also contributing to the reduction is the decrease in the amount of capital costs related to Stormwater Management in contrast to the 2013 study, due to more refined cost estimates for the projects. Report FEN 22-17 November 6, 2017 Subject: Statutory Public Meeting Regarding Proposed 2017 Development Page 7 Charge By-law and Background Study Non -Residential Rate Comparison of Current Rates to Proposed Rates Service $ Per Sq. ft, of Floor Area $ Per Net Ha of Prestige Employment Land in Seaton Current (Indexed) Proposed Jan. 1/18 Current (Indexed) Proposed Jan. 1/18 Municipal Wide Services Other Service Related to Highway 0.15 5,451 Operations Services 0.27 8,264 Protection Services 0.34 11,431 Fire Protection 0.29 9,020 Parks and Recreation 0.47 0.39 14,514 13,261 Library Services 0.07 0.08 2,360 2,605 Administration Studies 0.08 0.10 2,788 3,560 Stormwater Management 0.19 0.10 6,057 3,504 Total Municipal Wide Services (Line A) 1.37 1.15 43,003 39,812 Outside of Seaton Lands Transportation 2.77 1.83 - - Total Outside of Seaton Lands (Line B) 2.77 1.83 - - Rest of Pickering (Line A+B) 4.14 2.98 Seaton 1.37 1.15 43,003 39,812 The non-residential DC for lands outside of the Seaton Prestige Employment Lands are recovered from development on a per sq. ft. of total floor area basis. While total DC eligible costs have increased by 31%, the DC has decreased by approximately 28%. This decrease is attributable to the increase in the gross floor area forecast. For Seaton industrial and commercial development, a different approach was applied as it relates to development charges. A land area specific charge (per net Hectare) is used in contrast to a floor area charge. Under the floor area charge approach, the DC charges are based on the size of the building. The property owner may apply a phased development approach over several years to fully utilize the land size, such that the DC's would be payable over a lengthy time period. Using the land area approach in Seaton, the developer pays the full DC at the time of the first development regardless of the fact that there may be several phases of construction development. This approach encourages expedient buildout, discourages land banking and creates a more favourable cash flow scenario for the City. Report FIN 22-17 November 6, 2017 Subject: Statutory Public Meeting Regarding Proposed 2017 Development Page 8 Charge By-law and Background Study City of Pickering IDC Rates Comparison of Current Rates to Proposed Rates The proposed changes to all of Pickering's DC rates are summarized below: The above chart shows that the DC charges for apartments are increasing more than single and semi-detached. The reason for the larger increase is that according StatsCan census data the persons per unit (PPU) is increasing in apartments. The current study has used updated census figures as compared to the 2013 study. The increase in PPU's may be explained by the increasing housing prices which are making condos and apartments the entry point into the real estate market rather than townhouses. The change in person per unit assumptions is as follows: Rest of Pickering Seaton Current (Indexed) Proposed Current (Indexed) Proposed Residential 1.84 2.23 21.20 Apartment <2 Single and Semi -Detached 14,099 14,349 8,464 7,832 Apts. 2 Bedrooms + 7,453 9,066 4,473 4,949 Apts. Less than 2 Bedrooms 5,470 6,422 3,284 3,505 Other Multiples 11180 11,586 6,709 6,325 Non -Residential 4.14 2.98 1.37 1.15 The above chart shows that the DC charges for apartments are increasing more than single and semi-detached. The reason for the larger increase is that according StatsCan census data the persons per unit (PPU) is increasing in apartments. The current study has used updated census figures as compared to the 2013 study. The increase in PPU's may be explained by the increasing housing prices which are making condos and apartments the entry point into the real estate market rather than townhouses. The change in person per unit assumptions is as follows: Competitive DC Rates The graph below shows that Pickering's proposed single detached residential DC rate is competitive in comparison with both its Durham Lakeshore neighbours and other GTA comparators (see Attachment 1). Pickering will maintain a very competitive position, especially given its proximity to Toronto. Out of all the communities that border Toronto, Pickering has the lowest DC rates. 2013 2017 Single 3.48 3.53 1.44 Apartment 2+ 1.84 2.23 21.20 Apartment <2 1.35 1.58 17.04 Other 2.76 2.85 3.26 Competitive DC Rates The graph below shows that Pickering's proposed single detached residential DC rate is competitive in comparison with both its Durham Lakeshore neighbours and other GTA comparators (see Attachment 1). Pickering will maintain a very competitive position, especially given its proximity to Toronto. Out of all the communities that border Toronto, Pickering has the lowest DC rates. Report FIN 22-17 November 6, 2017 Subject: Statutory Public Meeting Regarding Proposed 2017 Development Page 9 Charge By-law and Background Study $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 Single and Semi Detached Whitby Oshawa Ajax Clarington Rest of Rest of Seaton Seaton Pickering Pickering (Current) (New) (New) (Current) $ per sq. ft 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 1 s Lower Tier Pickering Region Education Commercial I Whitby Oshawa Clarington Ajax Rest of Rest of Seaton Seaton Pickering Pickering (Current) (New) (Current) (New) Lower Tier Pickering Region Education Report FIN 22-17 November 0, 2017 Subject: Statutory Public Meeting Regarding Proposed 2017 Development Page 10 Charge By-law and Background Study $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 Indexing Apts. 2 Bedroom + Whitby Oshawa Rest of Ajax Rest of Clarington Seaton Seaton Pickering Pickering (New) (Current) (New) (Current) Lower Tier 1' Pickering Region Education Based on our current DC By-law, DC rates shall be adjusted annually as of July 1 each year based on the Non-residential Building Construction index in order to keep DC revenues current with construction costs. The previous indexing was done on July 1, 2017, and would be due for indexing again on July 1, 2018. Staff are proposing that the new DC rates be indexed starting on July 1, 2018. Transition to New Rates The proposed rates will come into effect on January 1, 2018. Any complete building permit applications received after January 1, 2018 will be subject to the new DC rate. Proposed Major By-law Policy Changes Under the 2013 DC By-law, property owners were given development charge credits when they demolished an existing building or dwelling. These development charge credits have a ten year life. The ten year time period does not encourage development. Instead, it allows inactivity. After demolition while a property sits vacant, the City and the Region only receive property taxes based on the vacant land class. The 2017 DC By-law proposes to change the ten year DC credit period to five years. The five year period should provide sufficient time for any rezoning or planning approval changes, and will encourage future redevelopment. Under the 2013 By-law, farm buildings were exempt from all DC charges. The 2017 DC By-law proposes to change the full exemption for farm buildings to a partial exemption by imposing a DC charge for roads and fire protection. These two DC components (road and fire protection) related to farm activity. Report FIN 22-17 November 6, 2017 Subject: Statutory Public Meeting Regarding Proposed 2017 Development Page 11 Charge By-law and Background Study Communications Strategy The DC Act has a mandatory communication/advertising requirement for at least one public meeting, and the Clerk is required to carry out such advertising at least twenty days in advance of the Meeting date. The Statutory Public Meeting was first advertised in the Pickering News Advertiser on October 11, 2017 and will continue every Wednesday until November 1, 2017. In addition, reference to the Statutory Public Meeting has been advertised on the City's website. The City has met the requirements of the Development Charges Act. On October 17th, staff reached out to the development industry by distributing the DC Background Study, dated October 5, 2017 and holding a stakeholder consultation on November 1St. The comments from this meeting were not available at the time this report was written. Next Steps Following receipt of comments at the Public Meeting, and written submissions no later than November 17th, 2017, staff will bring forward a final report and proposed DC By- law for Council's consideration at the Council meeting to be held on December 11th 2017. If enacted, the new DC By-law will be effective January 1, 2018. Attachments: 1. Residential Development Charges per Single Detached Dwelling for Greater Toronto Area Municipalities, as of October 19, 2017 2. 2017 Development Charges Background Study, dated October 5, 2017 Prepared By: Caryn Kong, CPA, CGA Senior Financial Analyst — Capital & Debt Management Prepare ;B . Paul Creamer Senior Accounting Analyst, Internal Audit Approved / Endorsed By: Stan Karwowski, CPA, CMA, MBA Director, Finance & Treasurer Report FIN 22-17 November 6, 2017 Subject: Statutory Public Meeting Regarding Proposed 2017 Development Page 12 Charge By-law and Background Study Recommended for the consideration of Pickering ail Council c'a Tony Prevedelng. Chief Administrat e Officer $100,000 Residential Development Charges Per Single Detached Dwelling for Greater Toronto Area Municipalities as of October 19, 2017 $80,000 - $60,000 3 +n- $40,000 $20,000 • • IN -U-• mUpperTier ❑ Lower Tier !Education • EN mi •• • • . , , 1-1 1 acp�� od le sa5 ° So't6`raaPO �� o�5`o �\�glS� �0` \SaJ$"es , GRa`,44 o p <<e''.5\ 5� 4 �yC .z.e• G;a `,„ e Q'oe ,(6 ,?'6 ,,cC'oi Gay ,.., ea�`til Q\G `met 4` 2, BB=Bu]It Boundary & GF=Greenfield. 1. A component of the charge has been converted from a per hectare charge to a hypothetical single detached unit. 2. Includes Financial Impacts Agreement (FIA) Charges ($1,266) Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. (10/19/2017) L 1-te. Ingr# lti()d)J 01 1 # 1N3NH7bll\f Non -Residential Development Charges Per GFA of Retail Floor Area for Greater Toronto Area Municipalities as of October, 2017 $60 1UpperTier ❑l ower Tier NI Education $50 - ii ----u— IM-L� $40 - Lr' — — j I� $30 cu - - - — -- 1 $20 $10 - - - $- . 0 `\ L`s� „on a� �F\ t,te� �1 \Sr \e rota pp\ `cp egg\ �\��\ �F\ `pp\ \pp\ a`�\ ,,00 exot, .0 4ysa .got' �o� ,,,a -i- got\ cea\ .,$z tom`- cl,2\ 0,j), ��� r o� � 0.0:'meq G�\p ar��oo�e� ,aJ$r��`ra �y`oP `���oo�\�o oae ���`�� oo��\s�,�a\o��l `ss\55ao¢ $ta�� �a �, os� c`a o� 5co ``��t.cc›.5:(. `c'''' *t a�opS'''' `'-s"` G ti4 c� Se awo T4� z`-,8 Loo „Ker Se 4` BB=Built Boundary & GF=Greenfield. 1. A portion of the charge has been converted from a per hectare charge to a hypothetical GFA charge assuming 30% coverage. 2. Includes Financial Impacts Agreement (FIA) Charges ($0.09/sq.ft.). prestige Employment Lands in Seaton pay FIA charge plus $41,750 per net hectare (current), $38,419 per net hectare(calculated)_ Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. (10/19/2017) $40 530 Nan -Residential Development Charges Per GFA of Industrial Floor Area for Greater Toronto Area Municipalities as of October 19, 2017 INN 510 ©Upper Tier ID Lower Tier ■Education $ r MI NM 1111 IM — IMO Lo ai\d1/4\\AOC v.? J �C\e \�\aSo� \6 1\G \�co�a1oay� at�"*%\L'N'rc. \�c�• Qcs \\%Jt`aaE <a�e0\t. ��J �, 0 .46 `.• ,3t-.ly \-�� \o ` \`y}q`r���`�O ago p \ . dy °co, o \ _ Sti0 o�Q �e ti R" -e'5 Se a'c t`�pP' Se Q\c�eG\cec��4 BB=Built Boundary &GF=Greenfield. 1. A portion of the charge has been converted from a per hectare charge to a hypothetical GFA charge assuming 30% coverage. 2. Includes Financial Impacts Agreement (FIA) Charges ($0.09/sq.ft.). Prestige Employment Lands In Seaton pay FIA charge plus $41,750 per net hectare (current), $38,419 per net hectare(calculated). Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. (10/19/2017) ATTACHMENT #.,7 TO REPORT # ' 1'7 City of Pickering 2017 Development Charges. Background Study For Public Circulation and Comment October 5, 2017 e. Watson !� ' & Associates ECONOM I S 'S Plaza Three 101-2000 Argentia Rd. Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 1V9 Phone: (905) 272-3600 Fax: (905) 272-3602 e-mail: infoawatson-econ ca www.watson-econ.ca / Planning for growth Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of this Document 1 1.2 Summary of the Process 2 2. Current City of Pickering D.C. Policy 4 2.1 By-law Enactment 4 2.2 Services Covered 4 2.3 Timing of D.C. Calculation and Payment 5 2.4 Redevelopment Credit 5 2.5 Exemptions 6 3. Anticipated Development in the City of Pickering 7 3.1 Requirements of the Act 7 3.2 Basis of Population, Household and Non -Residential Gross Floor Area Forecast 7 3.3 Summary of Growth Forecast 8 4. The Approach to the Calculation of the Charge 15 4.1 Services Potentially Involved 15 4.2 Local Service Policy 15 4.3 Capital Forecast 16 4.4 Treatment of Credits 21 4.5 Eligible Debt and Committed Excess Capacity 21 4.6 Existing Reserve Funds 22 4.7 Deductions 22 4.7.1 Reduction Required by Level of Service Ceiling 23 4.7.2 Reduction for Uncommitted Excess Capacity 23 4.7.3 Reduction for Benefit to Existing Development 24 4.7.4 Reduction for Anticipated Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions 24 4.7.5 The 10% Reduction 25 4.8 D.C. By -Law Spatial Applicability 25 5. D.C. Eligible Cost Analysis by Service 26 5.1 Service Levels and 10 -Year Capital Costs for City-wide D.C. Calculation 26 5.1.1 Protection Services 26 5.1.2 Parks and Recreation 27 5.1.3 Library Services 28 5.1.4 Administration 28 5.2 Service Levels and 14 -Year Capital Costs for City-wide D.C. Calculation 37 5.2.1 Other Services Related to a Highway 37 5.2.2 Stormwater Management 37 5.3 Service Levels and 14 -Year Capital Costs for Area -Specific (Outside of Seaton Lands) D.C. Calculation 42 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. FL\Pickering12017 DC Study\Report\Pickering DC Background Study -Final docx 5.3.1 Transportation Services 42 6. D.C. Calculation 46 7. D.C. Policy Recommendations and D.C. By-law Rules 53 7.1 D.C. By-law Structure 53 7.2 D.C. By-law Rules 54 7.2.1 Payment in any Particular Case 54 7.2.2 Determination of the Amount of the Charge 54 7.2.3 Application to Redevelopment of Land (Demolition and Conversion) 55 7.2.4 Exemptions (full or partial) 55 7.2.5 Phase in Provision(s) 56 7.2.6 Timing of Collection 56 7,2.7 Indexing 56 7.2.8 D.C. Spatial Applicability 56 7.3 Other D.C. By-Iaw Provisions 57 7.3.1 Categories of Services for Reserve Fund and Credit Purposes 57 7.3.2 By-Iaw In -force Date 57 7.3.3 Minimum Interest Rate Paid on Refunds and Charged for Inter -Reserve Fund Borrowing 57 7.4 Other Recommendations 57 8. Asset Management Plan 58 8.1 Introduction 58 9. By-Iaw Implementation 62 9.1 Public Consultation 62 9.1.1 Public Meeting of Council 62 9.1.2 Other Consultation Activity 62 9.2 Anticipated Impact of the Charge on Development 63 9.3 Implementation Requirements 63 9.3.1 Notice of Passage 64 9.3.2 By-law Pamphlet 64 9.3.3 Appeals 65 9.3.4 Complaints 65 9.3.5 Credits 65 9.3.6 Front -Ending Agreements 65 9.3.7 Severance and Subdivision Agreement Conditions 66 Appendix A — Background Information on Residential and Non-residential Growth Forecast 67 Appendix B — Level of Service 80 Appendix C -- D.C. Cash Flow Calculation Tables 99 Appendix D — Long-term Capital and Operating Cost Examination 120 Appendix E — Proposed D.C. By-Iaw 123 Appendix F — Local Service Policy 137 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd, H:IPickering12017 DC Study4Report\Pickering DC Background Study-Finai.docx List of Acronyms and Abbreviations A.M.P. Asset Management Plan D.C. Development Charge D.C.A. Development Charges Act E.S.A. Environmentally Safe Area G.E.A. Gross floor area mm Millimeters N.1F.P.O.W. No fixed place of work O.M.B. Ontario Municipal Board O.Reg. Ontario Regulation para. Paragraph P.P.U. Persons per unit R.S.O. Revised Statute of Ontario sq.ft. Square foot s.s. Subsection Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering12017 DC Sfudy\ReportlPickering DC Background Study -Final. docx Page 1 Introduction 1,1 Purpose of this Document This background study has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of the Development Charges Act (D.C.A.), 1997 (s.10), and accordingly, recommends new development charges (D.C.) and policies for the City of Pickering. The City retained Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. (Watson) to undertake the D.C. Background Study process in 2017. Watson worked with senior staff from the City in preparing this D.C. analysis and the policy recommendations. This D.C. Background Study, containing the proposed D.C. By -Law, will be distributed to members of the public in order to provide interested parties with sufficient background information on the legislation, the study's recommendations and an outline of the basis for these recommendations. This report has been prepared, in the first instance, to meet the statutory requirements applicable to the City's D.C. Background Study, as summarized in Chapter 4 and applied in Chapters 5 and 6. It also addresses the forecast amount, type and location of growth (Chapter 3), the requirement for "rules" governing the imposition of the charges (Chapter 7), Asset Management Plan requirements under the D.C.A. (Chapter 8), and the proposed by-law to be made available as part of the approval process (Appendix E). In addition, the report is designed to set out sufficient background on the legislation, the City's current D.C. policy (Chapter 2) and the policies underlying the proposed by-law, to make the exercise understandable to interested parties. Finally, the D.C. Background Study addresses post -adoption implementation requirements (Chapter 9) which are critical to the successful application of the new policy. The chapters in the report are supported by Appendices containing the data required to explain and substantiate the calculation of the charge. A full discussion of the statutory requirements for the preparation of a background study and calculation of a D.C. is provided herein. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering\2017 DC StudylReport\Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 2 1.2 Summary of the Process The public meeting required under Section 12 of the D.C.A., 1997, has been scheduled for November 6, 2017. Its purpose is to present the study to the public and to solicit public input on the proposed D.C. by-Iaw. The meeting is also being held to answer any questions regarding the study's purpose and methodology. Figure 1-1 outlines the process undertaken to date and the proposed schedule to be followed with respect to the D.C. by-law adoption process. In accordance with the legislation, the D.C. Background Study and proposed D.C. By - Law were made available for public review on October 11, 2017. Following the statutory public meeting, the process to be followed in finalizing the report and recommendations includes: • consideration of responses received prior to, at or immediately following the public meeting; • Council determination if any further public meetings are required on the matter; • finalization of the study and Council consideration of the by-Iaw on December 11, 2017; and • imposition of new development charges on January 1, 2018. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering42017 DC Study\Report4Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 3 Figure 1-1 Schedule of Key D.C, Process Dates Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H.4Pickeringl2017 DC StudyReportlPickering DC Background Study -Final docx Process Steps Dates 1. Project initiation meetings with City Steering Committee April, 2017 2. Data collection, staff interviews, methodology review, preparation of D.C. calculations June — September, 2017 3. Preparation of draft D.C. Background Study and review of draft findings with D.C. Steering Committee September 26, 2017 4, D.C. Background Study and proposed D.C. by-law available to public (60 days prior to by-law passage) October 11, 2017 5. Statutory notice of Public Meeting advertisement placed in newspaper(s) 20 clear days prior to public meeting 6. Presentation of D.C. Background Study to Stakeholders November 1, 2017 7. Public Meeting of Council November 6, 2017 8. Council considers adoption of D.C. Background Study and passage of by-law December 11, 2017 9. D.C. By -Law in force date January 1, 2018 10. Newspaper notice given of by-law passage By 20 days after passage 11. Last day for by-law appeal 40 days after passage 12. City makes available D.C. pamphlet by 60 days after in force date Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H.4Pickeringl2017 DC StudyReportlPickering DC Background Study -Final docx Page 4 2. Current City of Pickering D.C. Policy 2.1 By-law Enactment On December 9, 2013, the City of Pickering passed By -Law 7234/13 under the D.C.A., 1997. The by-law came into effect on January 1, 2014 and imposes uniform City-wide D.C.s by service for all permissible municipal services, with the exception of Transportation Services which on an area -specific basis for the lands outside of the Seaton lands only. The area -specific treatment of Transportation services is in accordance with the City's agreement with the Seaton Landowners, whereby transportation services attributable to these lands are funded directly by the landowners. 2.2 Services Covered The following services are included under By -Law 7234/13: City -Wide Services • Development -Related Studies • Fire • Parks Development • Major Indoor Recreation Facilities • Library • Operations Facilities and Vehicles • Stormwater Management Area -Specific Services • Transportation — Seaton1 • Transportation — rest of Pickering The By -Law provides for mandatory annual indexing of the charges on July 1st. Table 2-1 provides the charges currently in effect for residential and non-residential development types, as well as a breakdown of the charges by service. 1 Subject to a separate agreement outside of the D.C.A. concerning the provision of Transportation Service requirements in addition to other funding contributions. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\PickeringY2017 DC StudyReport\Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 5 Table 2-1 City of Pickering Schedule of Current Development Charges Service RESIDENTIAL NON-RESIDENTIAL Single and Semi- Detached} Dwelling Apartments - 2 Bedrooms Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom Other Multiples (perft� of Total Floor Area) 2 {per net Ha of Prestige Employment Land in Seaton) Development -Related Studies 196 104 76 155 0.08 2,707 Fire Protection 645 342 251 512 0.28 8,757 Parks Development & Trails 1,776 938 688 1,408 0.15 4,570 Indoor Recreation Facilities 3,697 1,954 1,433 2,932 0.31 9,521 Library 889 471 345 705 0.07 2,291 Operations Facilites & Vehicles 596 315 233 472 0.26 8,023 Transportation - Seaton 1 - Rest of Pickering 5,471 2,893 2,123 4,340 2.69 Stormwater Management 418 219 162 330 0.18 5,881 Seaton 8,217 4,343 3,188 6,514 1.33 41,750 Rest of Pickering 13,688 7,236 5,311 10,854 4.02 41,750 1. Subject to a separate agreement outside of the Development Charges Act conce ning the provision of Transportation requirements in addition to other funding contributions 2. Does not apply to prestige employment development in Seaton, as that development is subject to the per net Ha land area charge instead. 2.3 Timing of D.C. Calculation and Payment D.C. s are calculated and payable in full to the City at the time a permit is issued for any land, buildings or structures constituting development. 2.4 Redevelopment Credit Where as a result of the redevelopment of land, where a building or structure existing on land was demolished, a D.C. credit will only be issued where a building permit has been issued for redevelopment within 10 years of the demolition permit. D.C.s are payable for the dwelling units or additional non-residential floor area created are in excess of what was demolished. D.C. credits are also provided for the conversion of floor area from one principal use to another principal use (i.e. residential and non-residential). The D.C. payable is equal to charge for floor area/units in the space created, Tess the charge that would have been payable for the existing floor area/units. In no case shall the net charge be less than zero. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. NaPickering42017 DC Study4Report4Pickering DC Background Study-FinaLdocx Page 6 2.5 Exemptions The City's D.C. By -Law includes statutory exemptions from payment of D.C.s with respect to: • Industrial additions of up to and including 50% of the existing gross floor area of the building — for industrial additions which exceed 50% of the existing gross floor area, only the portion of the addition in excess of 50% is subject to the payment of D.C.s; • Land used for Municipal or Board of Education purposes; and • Residential development that results in only the enlargement of an existing dwelling unit, or that results only in the creation of up to two additional dwelling units (as specified by O.Reg. 82198). The By -Law also provides non -statutory exemptions from payment of D.C.s with respect to: • The development of a non-residential farm building used for bona fide agricultural purposes; • A building or structure that is used in connection with a place of worship and is exempt from taxation under the Assessment Act as a result; • Nursing homes and hospitals; and • Garden suites Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering42017 DC Study\Report\Pickering DG Background Study-Finatdocx Page 7 3. Anticipated Development in the City of Pickering 3.1 Requirements of the Act Chapter 4 provides the methodology for calculating a development charge as per the D. C.A. Figure 4-1 presents this methodology graphically. It is noted in the first box of the schematic that in order to determine the development charge that may be imposed, it is a requirement of Section 5 (1) of the D.C.A. that "the anticipated amount, type and location of development, for which development charges can be imposed, must be estimated." The growth forecast contained in this chapter (with supplemental tables in Appendix A) provides for the anticipated development for which the City will be required to provide services, over a 10 -year and long-term time horizon (i.e. 2018-2031). 3.2 Basis of Population, Household and Non -Residential Gross Floor Area Forecast The D.C. growth forecast has been derived from forecast contained in Durham Region Regional Official Plan Amendment No. 128, as approved by the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) on January 9, 2013. In accordance with the Durham Region Regional Official Plan (R.O.P.) and City of Pickering Official Plan (O.P.), the population and employment forecast for Community of Seaton is 61,000 and 30,500 by 2031.1 In compiling the growth forecast, the following additional information sources were also consulted to assess residential and non-residential development potential for the City over the forecast period; including: • A review of recent historical residential and non-residential development activity; • 2006, 2011 and 2016 Census Data (where available); and m Discussions with City staff regarding the anticipated residential and non- residential development trends for the City of Pickering. 1 Population forecast for Seaton includes the net Census undercount. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering42017 DC Study\Report4Pickering DC Background Study-Finai.docx Page 8 303 Summary of Growth Forecast A detailed analysis of the residential and non-residential growth forecast is provided in Appendix A. The discussion provided herein summarizes the anticipated growth for the City and describes the basis for the forecast. The results of the residential growth forecast analysis are summarized in Figure 3-1 below, and Schedule 1 in Appendix A. Figure 3-1 Household Formation -Based Population and Household Forecast Model DEMAND SUPPLY Historical Housing Construction Employment Market by Local Municipality, Economic Outlook Local, Regional and Provincial Forecast of Residential Units Occupancy Assumptions Gross Population Increase Decline in Existing Population Net Population Increase Residential Units in the Development Process Intensification Designated Lands Servicing Capacity Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:IPickering12017 DC Study\ReportlPickerng DC Background Study -Final, docx Page 9 As identified in Table 3-1 and Schedule 1, the City's population is anticipated to reach approximately 168,170 by 2028 and 180,885 by 2031.1 This represents an increase of 75,000 persons and 87,700 persons, respectively, over the 10 -year and long-term forecast periods. Further, the population forecast summarized in Schedule 1 excludes the net Census undercount, which is estimated at approximately 4.6%. The Census undercount represents the net number of persons missed during Census enumeration. In calculating the D.C. for the City, the net Census undercount has been excluded from the growth forecast. Accordingly, all references provided herein to the population forecast exclude the net Census undercount. 1. Unit Mix (Appendix A — Schedules 1 through 6) • The unit mix for the City was derived from historical development activity (as per Schedule 7) and discussions with planning staff regarding anticipated development trends for the City. • Based on the above, the Tong -term (2018-2031) household growth forecast is comprised of a housing unit mix of approximately 26% low density (single detached and semi-detached), 41% medium density (multiples except apartments) and 33% high density (bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2+ bedroom apartments). 2. Geographic Location of Residential Development (Appendix A — Schedule 22 • Schedule 2 summarizes the anticipated amount, type and location of residential development for the City by development location. The percentage of forecast housing growth between 2018 and 2031 by area within the City is summarized below. • Seaton 62% • Remaining City of Pickering 38% 3. Planning Period • Short-term and longer-term time horizons are required for the D.C. process. The D.C.A. limits the planning horizon for certain services, such as parks and recreation, and libraries, to a 10 -year planning horizon. Transportation and stormwater management services utilize a long-term forecast period. 1 It is noted that 36,500 persons (including the net Census undercount) and 11,700 households have been reserved for Northeast Pickering between 2027 and 2031 as the population and households for this area have been deferred. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering12017 DC StudylReportlPickering DC Background Study-Finatdocx Table 3-1 City of Pickering Residential Growth Forecast Summa ry Page 10 Year Population (Including Census Undercount)' Population (Excluding Census Undercount) Institutional Population Population Excluding Institutional Population Housing Units Singles & Semi Detached Multiple Dwellings2 Apartments' Other Total Households Person Per Unit (PPU) Mid 2006' Mid 2011::.''. Mid 2016 91,880 92,800 95,990 87,838 88,7.21: 91,771 87,243 88,126 90,995 20,335 20,740 21,125 4,770 5,380 6,065 3,110 3,190 3,695 28.225 29,325 30,915 3.11 3.03 2.97 rn U N 0 u Early 2018 Early 2023 Early 2028 Mid 2031 97,460 137,490 175,910 189,206 93,176 131,445 168,172 180.885 786 1,111 1,422 1,530 92,388 130,334 166,750 179,356 21,414 26,154 29,593 30,192 6,440 12,742 18,439 20,228 3,733 8,368 13,126 15,080 30 30 30 30 31.617 47,294 61,189 65,530 2.95 2.78 2.75 2.76 Incremental Mid 2006 = Mid 2011 , . 920 883 0 883 405 610 80 5 1;100 Ilflid2011-Mid 2016 3;190 3;050 81 2,869 385 685 505 15 1,590 Mid 2016 - Early 2018 1,470 1,405 12 1,393 289 375 38 0 702 Early 2018 - Early 2023 40,030 38,269 323 37,946 4,740 6,302 4,635 0 15,677 Early 2018 - Early 2028 78,450 74,996 634 74,362 8,179 11,999 9,393 0 29,572 Early 2018 - Mid 2031 91,746 87,709 742 86,968 8,778 13,788 11,347 0 33,913 Source: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2018. Derived from Durham Region Official Plan. Note: Population forecast excludes Northeast Pickering. Note: A total of approximately 36,500 persons (including the net Census undercount) and 11,700 households have been reserved for Northeast Pickering between 2027 and 2031 as the population and households allocated to this area have been deferred. 1. Census Undercount estimated at approximately 4.6%. Note: Population Including the Undercount has been rounded, 2. Includes tawnhomes and apartments in duplexes. 3. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering12017 DC Study4ReporttPickenng DC Background Study-Ffnal.docx Page 11 4. Population in New Units (Appendix A - Schedules 2 through 5) • The number of housing units to be constructed in the City during the short- term and long-term periods are presented in Figure 3-2. Over the 14 -year forecast period, the City is anticipated to average 2,422 housing units annually. • Population in new units is derived from Schedules 3 through 6, which incorporate historical development activity, anticipated units (see unit mix discussion) and average persons per unit by dwelling type for new units. • Schedules 7 and 8 summarizes the average number of persons per unit (P.P.U.) for the new permanent residential housing units by age and type of dwelling, based on 2011 custom Census data for the City. The 20 -year average P.P.U.'s by dwelling type are as follows: • Low density: • Medium density: • High density: 3.53 2.85 2.03 5. Existing Units and Population Change (Appendix A - Schedules 2 through 6) • Existing households estimates as of 2018 are based on the 2016 Census households, plus estimated residential units constructed between 2016 and 2018, assuming a 6 -month lag between construction and occupancy (see Schedule 3). • The decline in average occupancy levels for existing housing units is calculated in Schedules 3 through 5, by aging the existing population over the forecast period. The forecast population decline in existing households over the 2018 to 2031 forecast period is estimated at approximately 6,370. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. N.1Pickering12017 DC StudylReport\Pickerfng DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 12 Figure 3-2 City of Pickering Annual Housing Forecast Housing Units 3,500 3,000 — 2,500 - 2,000 1,500 -• 1,000 500 o — 101 575 272 425 283 54 ■ 755 5.254 7.054 3.054 3,353 3,112 3.112 3.112 3,112 3.112 1,447 1.447 1,447 1,447 sop0 201:' 1.0 .70-'1 �p2L ,2p'1,3 ,L,.'-°` ,Lpi,6 4-o'5° Years =Historical Low Density ®Medium Density =High Density —Historical Average Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:4Pickering42O17 DC Study4Report\Pickering DC Background Study-Finat.dodx Page 13 6. Employment (Appendix A, Schedules 9a, 9b and 9c) • Employment projections are largely based on the activity rate method, which is defined as the number of jobs in the City divided by the number of residents. Key employment sectors include primary, industrial, commercial/population-related, institutional, and work at home, which are considered individually below. • The City's 20111 employment base by place of work is outlined in Schedule 9a. The 2011 employment base is comprised of the following sectors: • 80 primary (less than 1%); • 3,080 work at home employment (approx. 9%); • 13,170 industrial (approx. 39%); • 13,010 commercial/population-related (approx. 39%); and • 4,320 institutional (approx. 13%). • The 2011 employment base by usual place of work, including work at home, is approximately 33,660 jobs. An additional 2,570 jobs have been identified for the City as having no fixed place of work (N.F.P.O.W.).2 The total employment including N.F.P.O.W. in 2011 is 36,230. As of early 2018 the City's total employment base is estimated at 38,770. • Schedule 9b, Appendix A, summarizes the employment forecast, excluding work at home and N.F.P.O.W. employment, which is the basis for the D.C. employment forecast. The impact on municipal services from work at home employees has already been included in the population forecast. The need for municipal services related to N.F.P.O.W. employees has largely been included in the employment forecast by usual place of work (i.e. employment and G.F.A. in the retail and accommodation sectors generated from N.F.P.O.W. construction employment). Furthermore, since these employees have no fixed work address, they cannot be captured in the non-residential gross floor area (G. F.A.) calculation. Accordingly, work -at-home and N.F.P.O.W. employees have been removed from the D.C. employment forecast and calculation. 1 2011 Employment is based on Statistics Canada 2011 Places of Work Employment dataset. 2 Statistics Canada defines "No Fixed Place of Work" (N.F.P.O.W.) employees as, "persons who do not go from home to the same work place location at the beginning of each shift. Such persons include building and landscape contractors, travelling salespersons, independent truck drivers, etc." Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:'Pickering12017 DC Study\ReportlPickering DC Background Study-Finai.docx Page 14 • Total employment for City (excluding work at home and N.F.P.O.W.) is anticipated to reach approximately 53,690 by 2028 and 63,900 by 2031. This represents an employment increase of approximately 21,120 and 31,330 additional jobs over the 10 -year and Tong -term forecast periods, respectively. 7. Non -Residential Square Footage Estimates (Gross Floor Area (G.F.A.)), Appendix A, Schedule 9b and 9c) • Square footage estimates were calculated in Schedule 9b based on the following employee density assumptions:1 • 1,200 sq.ft. per employee for industrial; • 400 sq.ft. per employee for commercial/population-related; and • 675 sq.ft. per employee for institutional employment. • The City-wide incremental non-residential G.F.A. increase is anticipated to be approximately 20.1 million sq.ft. over the 10 -year forecast period and 30.8 million sq.ft. over the long-term forecast period. • In terms of percentage growth, the Tong -term incremental G.F.A. forecast by sector is broken down as follows: • industrial — approx. 86%; • commercial/population-related — approx. 10%; and • institutional -- approx. 4%. • The employment and GFA allocation between Seaton and the remaining areas of the City has been developed in accordance with the employment forecast established for the City as a whole and the Seaton Community in accordance with the Durham ROP and City of Pickering Q.P. 1 Based on Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. employment surveys. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:4Pickering12017 DC SfudylReport\Pickering DC Background Study-FinaLdocx Page 15 4. The Approach to the Calculation of the Charge This chapter addresses the requirements of s.s.5(1) of the D.C.A., 1997 with respect to the establishment of the need for service which underpins the D.C. calculation. These requirements are illustrated schematically in Figure 4-1. 4.1 Services Potentially Involved Table 4-1 lists the full range of municipal service categories which are provided within the City. A number of these services are defined in s.s.2(4) of the D.C.A., 1997 as being ineligible for inclusion in D.C.s. These are shown as "ineligible" on Table 4-1. In addition, two ineligible costs defined in s.s.5(3) of the D.C.A. are "computer equipment" and "rolling stock with an estimated useful life of [less than] seven years..." In addition, local roads are covered separately under subdivision agreements and related means (as are other local services). Moreover, some services, such as water and wastewater services are provided by the Regional Municipality. Services which are potentially eligible for inclusion in the City's D.C. are indicated with a "Yes". The D.C.A allows municipalities to define services for inclusion in the by-law. In discussions with City staff it was determined that services previously defined as Operations, which includes services related to both Transportation Services and Parks and Recreation Services that these should be defined separately. As such the Transportation Services component of operations has been defined herein as Other Services Related to Highways. The component of operations related to Parks and Recreation Services have been included within that service definition. In addition, the City's existing D.C. By-law defines Parks Development and Major Indoor Recreation Facilities as separate services. These services have been combined into one service defined herein as Parks and Recreation Services. Finally, Protection Services has been expanded to include services related to by-law enforcement and animal enforcement services. 4.2 Local Service Policy The D.C. calculation commences with an estimate of "the increase in the need for service attributable to the anticipated development," for each service to be covered by the By -Law. There must be some form of link or attribution between the anticipated Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H: LPickering12017 DC Study\Report\Pickering DC Background Study-Finat. docx Page 16 development and the estimated increase in the need for service. While the need could conceivably be expressed generally in terms of units of capacity, s.s.5(1)3, which requires that municipal council indicate that it intends to ensure that such an increase in need will be met, suggests that a project -specific expression of need would be most appropriate. Some of the need for services generated by additional development consists of local services related to a plan of subdivision. As such, they will be required as a condition of subdivision agreements or consent conditions. The City's general policy guidelines on D,C. and local service funding is detailed in Appendix F to this report. 4.3 Capital Forecast Paragraph 7 of s.s.5(1) of the D.C.A. requires that, "the capital costs necessary to provide the increased services must be estimated." The Act goes on to require two potential cost reductions and the Regulation sets out the way in which such costs are to be presented. These requirements are outlined below. These estimates involve capital costing of the increased services discussed above. This entails costing actual projects or the provision of service units, depending on how each service has been addressed. The capital costs include: a) costs to acquire land or an interest therein (including a leasehold interest); b) costs to improve land; c) costs to acquire, lease, construct or improve buildings and structures; d) costs to acquire, lease or improve facilities including rolling stock (with a useful life of 7 or more years), furniture and equipment (other than computer equipment), materials acquired for library circulation, reference or information purposes; e) interest on money borrowed to pay for the above -referenced costs; f) costs to undertake studies in connection with the above -referenced matters; and g) costs of the D.C. background study. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering12017 DC StudylReport\Pickering DC Background Study-Finai. docx Tax Base, User Rates, 1 etc. Subdivision Agreements and Consent Provisions 1 Page 17 Figure 4-1 The Process of Calculating a D.C. under the Act Anticipated Development 1. 2. Ineligible Services Estimated Increase in Need For Service 3, 7. Specified Local Services Financing, Inflation and Investment Considerations 14. DC Needs By Service Ceiling Re: Increased Need 4. Needs That Will E3e Met f 5. • Examination of the Long Term) Capital and Operating Costs For Capital Infrastructure 6. Less: Uncommitted Excess Capacity 9 Less: • Benefit To Existing Devpt. 10. ® Less: Grants, Subsidies and ' Other Contributions 111 '`11) Less: • DC Net Capital Costs Costs for new development vs. existing development for the term of the by-law and the balance of the period 13 1 O% Where Applicable Amount of the Charge By Type of Development (including apportionment of costs residential and non-residential) 16. phase -ins, etc. DC By-laws) Spatial Applicability 15, Consideration of exemptions, Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H: 4Pickering12017 DC Study\ReporttPickering DC Background Study FinaLdocx Page 18 Table 4-1 Categories of Municipal Services To Be Addressed as Part of the Calculation Categories of Eligibility for Municipal Inclusion in Services the D.C. Calculation Service Components Maximum Potential D.C. Recovery o/a 1. Services Related to a Highway Yes Yes Local Service Yes Yes 1.1 Arterial roads 1.2 Collector roads 1.3 Local roads 1.4 Intersections and Traffic signals 1.5 Sidewalks and streetlights 100 100 100 100 100 2. Other Transportat- ion Services nla nla nla No Yes Yes nla nla 2.1 Transit vehicles 2.2 Other transit infrastructure 2.3 Municipal parking spaces - indoor 2.4 Municipal parking spaces - outdoor 2.5 Works Yards 2.6 Rolling stock1 2.7 Ferries 2.8 Airport facilities 100 100 90 90 100 100 90 90 3. Storm Water Drainage and Control Services Yes Yes Local Service 3.1 Main channels and drainage trunks 3.2 Channel connections 3.3 Retention/detention ponds 100 100 100 4. Fire Protection Services Yes Yes Yes 4.1 Fire stations 4.2 Fire pumpers, aerials and rescue vehicles 4.3 Small equipment and gear 100 100 100 5. Outdoor Recreation Services (i.e. Parks and Open Space) Ineligible Yes Yes Yes Yes 5.1 Acquisition of land for parks, woodlots and E.S.A.s 5.2 Development of area municipal parks 5.3 Development of district parks 5.5 Development of special purpose parks 5.6 Parks rolling stock' and yards 0 90 90 90 90 'with 7+ year life time 2same percentage as service component to which it pertains computer equipment excluded throughout Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H: \Pickering12017 DC StudylReport\Pickering DC Background Study -Final. docx Page 19 Categories of Municipal 'Services Eligibility for Inclusion in the D.C. Calculation Service Components Maximum Potential D.C. Recovery 6. Indoor Recreation Services Yes Yes 6.1 Arenas, indoor pools, fitness facilities, community centres, etc. (including land) 6.2 Recreation vehicles and equipment' 90 90 7. Library Services Yes Yes 7.1 Public library space (incl. furniture and equipment) 7.2 Library materials 90 90 8. Electrical Power Services Ineligible Ineligible Ineligible 8.1 Electrical substations 8.2 Electrical distribution system 8.3 Electrical system rolling stocks 0 0 0 9. Provision of Cultural, Entertainment and Tourism Facilities and Convention Centres Ineligible Ineligible 9.1 Cultural space (e.g. art galleries, museums and theatres) 9.2 Tourism facilities and convention centres 0 0 10. Waste Water Services nla nla n/a 10.1 Treatment plants 10.2 Collection systems 10.3 Local systems 100 100 100 11. Water Supply Services nla nla n/a 11.1 Treatment plants 11.2 Distribution systems 11.3 Local systems 100 100 100 12. Waste Management Services nla Ineligible n/a 12.1 Collection, transfer vehicles and equipment 12.3 Landfills and other disposal facilities 12.3 Other waste diversion facilities 90 0 90 13. Police Services nla nla nla 13.1 Police detachments 13.2 Police rolling stock' 13.3 Small equipment and gear 100 100 100 14. Homes for the Aged n/a 14.1 Homes for the aged space 90 15. Day Care nla 15.1 Day care space 90 16. Health n/a 16.1 Health department space 90 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 1-1:1Pickering42017 DC StudylReport\Pickering DC Background Study-FinaLdocx Page 20 Categories of Municipal Services Eligibility for Inclusion in the D.C. Calculation Service Components Maximum Potential D.C. Recovery °10 17. Social Services n/a 17.1 Social service space 90 18. Ambulance n/a n/a 18.1 Ambulance station space 18.2 vehicles' 90 90 19. Hospital Provision ineligible 19.1 Hospital capital contributions 0 20. Provision of Head- quarters for the General Ad ministra- tion of Municipalities and Area Municipal Boards Ineligible Ineligible Ineligible 20.1 Office space (all services) 20.2 Office furniture 20.3 Computer equipment 0 0 0 21.Other Services Yes Yes 21.1 Studies in connection with acquiring buildings, rolling stock, materials and equipment, and improving land2 and facilities, including the D.C. background study cost 21.2 interest on money borrowed to pay for growth -related capital 0-100 0-100 Eligibility for Inclusion in the DC Description Calculation Yes Municipality provides the service - service has been included in the DC Calculation No Municipality provides the service - service has not been included in the DC Calculation n/a Municipality does not provide the service Ineligible Service is ineligible for inclusion in the DC calculation 1with 7+ year life time 2same percentage as service component to which it pertains computer equipment excluded throughout Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:lPickering12017 DC StudylReportlPickering DC Background Study -Final. docx Page 21 In order for an increase in need for service to be included in the D.C. calculation, municipal council must indicate "...that it intends to ensure that such an increase in need will be met" (s.s.5(1)3). This can be done if the increase in service forms part of a Council -approved Official Plan, capital forecast or similar expression of the intention of Council (O.Reg. 82/98 s.3). The capital program contained herein reflects the City's approved and proposed capital budgets and master servicing/needs assessments. 4.4 Treatment of Credits Section 8 para. 5 of O.Reg. 82/98 indicates that a D.C. background study must set out, "the estimated value of credits that are being carried forward relating to the service." s.s.17 para. 4 of the same Regulation indicates that, "...the value of the credit cannot be recovered from future D.C.s," if the credit pertains to an ineligible service. This implies that a credit for eligible services can be recovered from future D.C.s. As a result, this provision should be made in the calculation, in order to avoid a funding shortfall with respect to future service needs. The City currently has no outstanding credit obligations. 4.5 Eligible Debt and Committed Excess Capacity Section 66 of the D.C.A., 1997 states that for the purposes of developing a D.C. by-law, a debt incurred with respect to an eligible service may be included as a capital cost, subject to any limitations or reductions in the Act. Similarly, s.18 of O.Reg. 82/98 indicates that debt with respect to an ineligible service may be included as a capital cost, subject to several restrictions. In order for such costs to be eligible, two conditions must apply. First, they must have funded excess capacity which is able to meet service needs attributable to the anticipated development. Second, the excess capacity must be "committed," that is, either before or at the time it was created, Council must have expressed a clear intention that it would be paid for by D.C.s or other similar charges. For example, this may have been done as part of previous D.C. processes. The City will be issuing debt for the New Operations Centre that is currently under Construction. The anticipated debt repayment costs have been included in the calculation of the charge. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering12017 DC StudylReportPickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 22 4.6 Existing Reserve Funds Section 35 of the D.C.A. states that: "The money in a reserve fund established for a service may be spent only for capital costs determined under paragraphs 2 to 8 of subsection 5(1)." There is no explicit requirement under the D.C.A. calculation method set out in s.s.5(1) to net the outstanding reserve fund balance as part of making the D.C. calculation; however, s.35 does restrict the way in which the funds are used in future. The City's projected uncommitted D.C. reserve fund balances, by service, as at December 31, 2017 are presented in Table 4-2. Projected balances account for 2017 D.C. commitments as well as anticipated D.C. collections to December 31, 2017. These balances have been applied against future spending requirements for all services. Incomplete D.C. eligible capital projects for which D.C. Reserve Fund balances have been committed have not been included in the capital needs identified in the D.C. Background Study. Table 4-2 City of Pickering Projected Uncommitted D.C. Reserve Funds Balances (December 31, 2017) Service Total Protection Services (254,176) Parks and Recreation Services Library Services _16,528,412 2,798,782 (673,868) 976,371 Administration Studies Stormwater Management Transportation 18,249,536 Other Services Related to a Highway 153,919 Total 37, 778, 976 4.7 Deductions The D.C.A., 1997 potentially requires that five deductions be made to the increase in the need for service. These relate to: • the level of service ceiling; • uncommitted excess capacity; • benefit to existing development; • anticipated grants, subsidies and other contributions; and ▪ a 10% reduction for certain services. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. N: 4Pickering12g17 DC Study4Report\Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 23 The requirements behind each of these reductions are addressed as follows: 4.7.9 Reduction Required by Le vel of Service Ceiling This is designed to ensure that the increase in need for services does "...not include an increase that would result in the level of service (for the additional development increment) exceeding the average level of the service provided in the City over the 10 - year period immediately preceding the preparation of the background study..." O.Reg. 82/98 (s.4) goes further to indicate that, "...both the quantity and quality of a service shall be taken into account in determining the level of service and the average level of service." Moreover, the D.C.A., 1997 does not require this historical level of service calculation for transit services. As per subsection 5.2(3) of the D.C.A., "...the estimate for the increase in the need for a prescribed service (i.e. transit services) shall not exceed the planned level of service over the 10 -year period immediately following the preparation of the background study...". In many cases this can be done by establishing a quantity measure in terms of units as floor area, land area or road length per capita, and a quality measure in terms of the average cost of providing such units based on replacement costs, engineering standards or recognized performance measurement systems, depending on circumstances. When the quantity and quality factor are multiplied together, they produce a measure of the level of service, which meets the requirements of the Act, i.e. cost per unit. The average service level calculation sheets for each service component in the D.C. calculation are set out in Appendix B, 4,7,2 Reduction for Uncommitted Excess Capacity Paragraph 5 of s.s.5(1) requires a deduction from the increase in the need for service attributable to the anticipated development that can be met using the City's "excess capacity," other than excess capacity which is "committed" (discussed above in 4.5). "Excess capacity" is undefined, but in this case must be able to meet some or all of the increase in need for service, in order to potentially represent a deduction. The deduction of uncommitted excess capacity from the future increase in the need for service, would normally occur as part of the conceptual planning and feasibility work associated with justifying and sizing new facilities, e.g. if a road widening to accommodate increased traffic is not required because sufficient excess capacity is already available, then widening would not be included as an increase in need, in the first instance. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H: IPickering12017 DC StudylReportlPickering DC Background Study -Final. docx Page 24 4.7.3 Reduction for Benefit to Existing Development This step involves a further reduction to the need, by the extent to which such an increase in service would benefit existing development. The level of services cap is related, but is not the identical requirement. Wastewater (sanitary), stormwater and water trunks are highly localized to growth areas and can be more readily allocated in this regard than other services such as roads which do not have a fixed service area. Where existing development has an adequate service level which will not be tangibly increased by an increase in service, no benefit would appear to be involved. For example, where expanding existing library facilities simply replicates what existing residents are receiving, they receive very limited (or no) benefit as a result. On the other hand, where a clear existing service problem is to be remedied, a deduction should be made accordingly. In the case of services such as recreation facilities, community parks, libraries, etc., the service is typically provided on a municipal -wide system basis. For example, facilities of the same type may provide different services (i.e. leisure pool vs. competitive pool), different programs (i.e. hockey vs. figure skating) and different time availability for the same service (i.e. leisure skating available on Wednesday in one arena and Thursday in another). As a result, residents will travel to different facilities to access the services they want at the times they wish to use them, and facility location generally does not correlate directly with residence location. Even where it does, displacing users from an existing facility to a new facility frees up capacity for use by others and generally results in only a very limited benefit to existing development. Further, where an increase in demand is not met for a number of years, a negative service impact to existing development is involved for a portion of the planning period. 4.74 Reduction for Anticipated Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions This step involves reducing the capital costs necessary to provide the increased services by capital grants, subsidies and other contributions made or anticipated by Council and in accordance with various rules such as the attribution between the share related to new vs. existing development O.Reg. 82/98, s.6. Where grant programs do not allow funds to be applied to growth -related capital needs, the proceeds can be applied to the non -growth share of the project exclusively. Moreover, Gas Tax revenues are typically used to fund non -growth -related works or the non -growth share of D.C. projects, given that the contribution is not being made in respect of particular growth -related capital projects. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickerrng12017 DC StudylReportlPickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 25 47.5 The 10% Reduction Paragraph 8 of s.s.(1) of the D.C.A. requires that, "the capital costs must be reduced by 10 percent." This paragraph does not apply to water supply services, wastewater services, stormwater drainage and control services, services related to a highway, police, fire protection services, and transit services. The primary services that the 10% reduction does apply to include services such as parks and recreation, libraries, childcare/social services, ambulance, hornes for the aged and health. The 10% is to be netted from the capital costs necessary to provide the increased services, once the other deductions have been made, as per the infrastructure cost sheets in Chapter 5. 4.8 D.C. By -Law Spatial Applicability There are four basic choices to be addressed when considering the geographic application of a D.C.: 1. the entire municipality for all services (which is the most commonly -used approach); 2. part of the municipality for all services; balance of the municipality is exempt (because it is outside the service's coverage area or can be served at little or no incremental cost); 3. different by-laws and charges in different municipal service areas (in order to recognize distinctly different servicing cost situations); and 4. a uniform municipal -wide charge with separate charge covering additional area - specific services (e.g. the coverage area for specific works). Subsection 2(9) of the D.C.A. may prescribe services for which a D.C. by-law must apply on an area -specific basis. For prescribed services, Council shall pass different D.C. by-laws for different parts of the municipality, in accordance with the prescribed criteria. Currently the Province has not prescribed services under this subsection of the D.C.A. For services that are not prescribed under s.s. 2(9) of the D.C.A., the background study must give consideration of the use of more than one D.C. by-law to reflect different needs for services in different areas. Area -specific charges have been reviewed with City staff. The City's current D.C. policy provides for Transportation Services to be provided on an area -specific basis, with charges differentiated between the Seaton Lands and those lands within the City outside of Seaton. All other service are provided on a uniform City-wide basis. Based on current practice, and associated agreements, no changes are being recommended to the structure of the charges. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering42017 DC Study\Report4Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 26 5. D.C. Eligible Cost Analysis by Service This chapter outlines the basis for calculating D.C. eligible costs to be applied on a City- wide uniform basis for all services except Transportation Services, and area -specific basis for Transportation Services only. The required calculation process set out in s.5(1) paragraphs 2 to 8 in the D.C.A., 1997, and described in Chapter.4, was followed in determining D.C. eligible costs. The nature of the capital projects and timing identified in this chapter reflects Council's current intention. However, over time, municipal projects and Council priorities change and, accordingly, Council's intentions may alter and different capital projects (and timing) may be required to meet the need for services required by new growth. 5.1 Service Levels and 10 -Year Capital Costs for City-wide D.C. Calculation This section evaluates the development -related capital requirements for select services over the 10 -year planning period (2018-2027). For these services, each service component is evaluated on two format sheets: the average historical 10 -year level of service calculation (see Appendix B), which "caps" the D.C. amounts; and the infrastructure cost calculation, which determines the potential D.C. recoverable cost. 5.7.1 Protection Services The City currently has 35,700 sq.ft, of floor space within four fire stations and 4,300 sq.ft. of facility floor space related to by-law enforcement and animal enforcement services. The City also maintains an inventory of 39 vehicles and provides approximately 1,000 items of equipment for fire protection equipment. In total, the inventory of Protection Services assets provides a historic average level of service of approximately $340 per capita. The historical level of investment in Protection Services provides for a D.C.-eligible amount over the forecast period of approximately $25.3 million. The City will require funds for two new fire stations within the Seaton Community, six additional vehicles, and equipment for 80 additional firefighters. Furthermore, the City will also requires additional facility space and vehicles for by-law and animal - enforcement services. In total, the gross capital cost estimates for the increase in need for service, totals $27.9 million. After deductions of $2.4 million for the benefit to existing development, $626,000 for the statutory 10% deduction related to by-law and animal enforcement service only, the net D.C. eligible costs total $24.9 million. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H 4Pickering42017 DC Study4Report\Pickering DC Background Study -Final. docx Page 27 Accounting for $254,000 related to reserve fund deficit position, the total D.C. eligible capital costs that have been included in the calculation of the charge are $25.1 million. The allocation of net growth -related costs for fire services between residential, and non- residential development is 78% and 22% respectively, reflective of the incremental growth in population and employment over the forecast period. Non-residential costs have been further allocated between development occurring on prestige employment lands within Seaton (36%) and all other areas of the City (64%) based on the incremental distribution of non-residential employment. 5.1.2 Parks and Recreation The City currently maintains approximately 345 acres of active developed parkland, 478 acres of passive parkland, and maintains 23.2 kilometres of trails and multi -use paths. Furthermore, the City utilizes 531,000 sq.ft. of recreation and parks operations facility space in providing parks and recreation services. To assist in the provision of services through the aforementioned facilities, parks and trails inventory, the City utilizes 186 vehicle and equipment items. The City's level of service over the historic 10 -year period averaged $2,693 per capita. In total, the maximum D.C.-eligible amount for Recreation and Parks Services over the 10 -year forecast period is approximately $200.2 million based on the established level of service standards. The 10 -year capital needs for parks and recreation services to accommodate growth have a total gross capital cost of approximately $176.9 million. These capital needs are comprised of future parkland and trail development, additional indoor recreation space needs, and additional parks maintenance vehicles and the share of operations facilities related to parks. Approximately $15.7 million has been deducted to reflect the benefit to the existing of the identified projects, and a further $17.4 million has been deducted to account for development benefits post -2027. The statutory 10% deduction applicable for recreation and parks totals $14.1 million. Approximately $16.5 million has been deducted from the D.C. recoverable capital costs recognizing the existing reserve fund balance, resulting in net growth -related capital costs for inclusion in the D.C. calculation of approximately $113.4 million. As the predominant users of parks and recreation services tend to be residents of the City, the forecast growth -related costs have been allocated 95% to residential development and 5% to non-residential development. Non-residential costs have been further allocated between development occurring on prestige employment lands within Seaton (36%) and all other areas of the City (64%) based on the incremental distribution of non-residential employment. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 1-1.4Plckerng42017 DC StudylReport\Pfckering DC Background Study-Finai.docx Page 28 5.1.3 Library Services Library services are provided by the City through the provision of approximately 45,200 sq.ft. of facility space, 379,000 library collection material items, and one vehicle. The average level of service provided over the historical 10 -year period based on this inventory is $375 per capital. When applied to anticipated growth over the 2018-2027 period, the per capita level of service produces a maximum D.C. eligible amount for library services of approximately $27.9 million. The gross capital cost included in the D.C. calculation for the 10 -year forecast period is $44.7 million. The capital cost estimates include a new library branch in Seaton (including land and materials), an expansion to the Central Library Facility and additional library space at the Pickering Heritage and Community Centre. Deductions for the benefit to existing development total $6.2 million. A further $7.8 million has been deducted to reflect the benefits to development beyond the 10 -year planning period. Furthermore, deductions of approximately $3.1 million for the required 10% statutory deduction have been applied. There is a current reserve fund balance of $2.8 million, when applied results in a net D.C. recoverable capital cost of $24.8 million which has been included in the D.C. calculation. Similar to Parks and Recreation Services, the predominant users of library services tend to be residents of the City, as such the forecast growth -related costs have been allocated 95% to residential development and 5% to non-residential development. Non- residential costs have been further allocated 36% to prestige employment lands within Seaton and 64% to all other areas of the City, based on the incremental distribution of non-residential employment. 5.1.4 Administration The D.C.A. permits the inclusion of studies undertaken to facilitate the completion of the City's capital works program and the D.C. Background Study. The City has made provision for the inclusion of new studies undertaken to facilitate future D.C. processes, as well as other studies which benefit future growth, including facility related studies, master plans, and planning studies, including a municipal comprehensive review and official plan review. The gross capital cost estimates for these studies total approximately $12.5 million over the 10 -year forecast period. Approximately $674,000 has been added for existing reserve fund deficits, and approximately $4.7 million has been deducted in recognition of the benefits to the existing population. Applying the 10% statutory deduction, the net Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering12017 DC Study\Report\Prckerrng DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 29 growth -related capital costs included in the calculation of the charge totals approximately $7.9 million. These costs have been allocated 78% to residential development, and 22% to non- residential development (8% prestige employment lands within Seaton and 14% all other areas of the City) based on the incremental growth in population to employment for the 10 -year forecast period. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering12017 DC Study\Report\Pickering DC Background Study-Ffnat.docx Page 30 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation - Protection Services Prj .No Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated D' ' 1 (year) Capital Cost Estimate 117S) Post Period Benefit Net CapitalTiming Cost Less: Subtotal Less: Other (e.g. 10°7o Statutory Deduction) Potential DC Recoverable Cost • Development Grants, Subsidies and ether Contributions Attributable to New Development Total Residential Share 78% Non - Residential Share 22% Facilities Fire Station A (Seaton) 2019 5, 504, 202 - 5,804,232 145,105 5,659,097 8.024,250 6,102,104 610,210 5,659,097 8,024,250 4,414,096_ 6,258,915 1,245,001 1,765,335 1. ,217 19 _ Station�11II IIII �li� 'including _ (Seaton) Animal Shelter & By -Law Services, all 2023 2020 8,230,0008,230,000 8,066,000 8,066,000 205,75D Vehicles 1 small vehicle (Seaton) 2018 45,00045,000 1,125 43,875 43,875 34,223 9,653 1 Aerial (Se •n) 2019 1,510,900 - 1,510,900 37,773 9,473,128IIi:IiJF1I:: 6 Aerial (Fire S ation B) (Seaton) 7 Small vehicle (2) (Seaton) 2023 90,000 90,000 1 87,750 8775068,445 19,305 Pumper- Station1 900,000 900 ,000 22,500 877,500 677500 • 1 193,050 Provision for additional By-law and Animal Services 2015-2027 158,000158,000 3,950 154,050 • 1 138.645 E. 30,502 Equipment 1 Equipment for 20 Firefighte s incl. Bunker Gear and Breathing A••aratus(StationA) 1 11 11 11 394,500 307,710 91 11 Equipment for 20 Firefighters incl. Bunker Gear and Breathing Apparatus (Station A) 1394,500394,500 394,500 394,500 307,710 56,79D 12 Equipment far 20 Firefighte s incl. Bunker Gear and Breathing loP13 aratus (Station B� 2023 394.500 1111 394,500 307,710 86,790 Equipment for 20 Firefighters incl Bunker Gear and Breathin• A• aratus {Station B) 1 11 IIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIII 11 394,500 11 1 1 8 •1 Reserve Fund Adjustment ,...__..__........._..... _...___._...._..-_..__ Total 27,89,002 - 27,893,002 2,420,121 25,472,881........................ 101,442 19,579,125 5,522,317 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:4Pickering42017 DC StudylReport4Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 31 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation - Parks and Recreation Services P No T'Code Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development 2018-2027 Gross Capital _ (20175) Benefit Cost Less: Subtotal Less: Other (e.g. 10% Statutory Deduction) Potential DC Recoverable Cost Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Develo ment p Total Residential Share 95% Non - Residential Share 5% '! Parks Parking lot expansion -Village East Park 2018-2027 107,900 - 107,900 80,925 26,975 2,698 24,278 23,064 1,214 2 3 Washraomlchangerooms - Rotary Frenchman's Bay West Park 2019 500,000 - 500,000 2,755,000 250,000 1,377,560 250,000 1,377,500 25,000 137,750 225000 1,239,750 213,750 1,177,763 11,250 .61-4,8 chma's Bay Waterfront MasterPlan Implementation (ph 1A & ph 1B) Frenn 2018 2,755,000 - , 4 Frenchman's Bay Waterfront Master Plan Implementation (ph 2) 2018-2019 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 950,000 1,000,000 475,000 1,000,000 475,000 100,000 47,500 900,000 855,000 Y.... 45e000 5 Frenchman's Bay Waterfront Master Pian Implementation (ph 3) 2019-2020 950,000 - 427,500 406,125 21,375 F 6 Community Park -Greenwood Conservation Lands (ph 1) 2021-2023 5,396,000 - 5,396,300 3,777,200 2,598,000 1,219,561 2,698,000 2,557,639 269,600 255,7642,301,875 2,428,200 2,306,790 2,186,782 121,410 115,094 7 Community Park -Greenwood Conservation Lands (ph 2) 2024-2027 3,777,200 Park - Krosno Creek valley - Hwy 401 to Bayly 2019-2023 269,800 - 259,850 26,980 242,820 24,282 218,538 257,611 10,927 9 Park - The Piazza - downtown south intensification 2019-2023 539,600 - 539,500 53,560 485,640 48,564 437,075 415,222 21,854 10 Skate Board Park -Community Size (Citic Centre) 2019 700,000 - . 700,000 350000 - 050,500 35,000 20,000 - 315,000 180,000 296,250 _{ 171,900 15,750 11 Skate Beard Park -Skate Spots (2 locations) 2018-2022 400,000 - 400,300 200,000 200,000 -- 9,000- 12 Village Green Construction - Kindwin Development (Brock Road) 2018 250,000 __ - 250,000 6,250 243,750 24,375 58,500 • 219,375 526,500 208,405 ---,5F-O,7175----65"- 10,969 2,32 13 D.H. Neighbourhood Park (Dersan & Til[ings Road) 2018-2019 600,000 - 600,000 15,000 585,000 • - Seaton Parkland - m_ -.m._mm�m-_-. 14 Neighbourhood Park 9-102 2016 950,000 - 950,300 23,750 • 926,250 92,625 • 833,625 791,944 41,581 15 Village Green 9-103 2018 210,000 - 210,300 5,250 204,750 20,475 184,275 175,291 __9214_ 16 Village Green 9-104 2018-2019 285,000 - 285,300 7,125 277,875 27,788 250,088 237,583 12,504 17 18 19 29 Village Green Village Green Neighbourhood Park ----P-107 VillageGreen uwW-- J -W---------9-108 9-105 9-106 2019-2020 2019-2020 2019 2019-2020 230,000 120,000 440,000 250,000 - - 230,000 120,000 449,000 250003 5,750 3,000 11,000 5,250243,750 -__--_--- 224,250 117,000 429,000 22,425 11,700 42,900386,100 24,375 201,825 105,303 219,375 191,734 100,035 356,795 _ 208,406 10,051 5,265 19,305 10,969 21 -' Neighbourhood Park 9-109 2019-2020 550,000 - 650,300 13,750 536,250 53.625 22,425 462.625 201,825 458,494 191,734 24,131 - 12,091 22 Village Green 9-110 2019-2020 230,003 - 230,000 5,750 224,250 23 Village Green 9-111 2019.2020 170,000 - 170,000 4,250 165,750 16.575 149,175 141,716 7,459 24 Village Green 9-112 2021 260,000 - 260,000 5,500 253,500 25,350 225,150 216,743 11,408 25 Village Green 9-113 2021 150,000 - 150,000 3,750 145,250 14,625 131,525 125,044 6,581 26 Village Green 9-114 2019-2020 222,003 - 222,000 5,550 215,450 21,645 194,805 185,065- 9,740 27 Community Park al Recreation Centre 9-115 2022 3,000,002 - 3,009,000 75,000 2,925,000 292,500 2,532,500 2.500,675 131,625 213 Vllage Green 9-116 2020-2021 230,003 - 230,000 5,750 224,250 22,425 201,825 191,734 10,091 29 Neighbourhood Park 9-117 2020-2021 540,000 - 540.000 13,500 525,500 52.650 473,850 450,158 23,693 30 Village Green 9-118 2020-2021 230,000 - - - - - 230,000 480,000 500,000 390,000 590,000 5,750 12,000 12,500 9,750 14,750 224,250 22,425 201,825 191,734 10,091 31 32 33 34 • Village Green Neighbourhood Park Village Green i Neighbourhood 9918 9-119 9-120 9-121 9-122 2020-2021 2020-2021 2020 2021 480,000 500,000 390,00D 590,000 468,000 487,500 380,250 575,250 46,800 48,750 38,025 57,525 421,200 436,750 342,225 517,725 400,140 416,813 325,114 491,839 • 21,063 21,936 17,111 25,886 35 Community Park 9-123 20242025 2.550,000 - 2,550,000 63,75D 2,486,250 248,625 2,237,625 2,125,744 111,881 36 Neighbourhood Park 9-124 2023 540,000 - 540,000 13,500 526,500 52,650 473,850 450,158 23,693 37 Village Green 9-125 2023-2024 240,000 - 240,000 6,000 234,000 23,400 210,600 200,070 10,530 36 Village Green 9-126 2023-2024 260,000 - 260,000 6,500 253,500 25,350 228,150 216,743 11,408 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering(2017 DC StudylReport\Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 32 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation - Parks and Recreation Services (Cont'd) Prj.No Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated p Development 2018-2027 ParksPares codeTiming (year Grass Capital Cost Estimate Post Period aenel Net Capital Less: Subtotal Less: Other {e. g, 103 Statutory Deduction) Potential PC Recoverable Cost Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New De'eiopment Total Residenla[ Share(2017$) 95% Non- ResidentialCosf Share 5% 39 Village Green -'P-127 2023-2024 230,000 - 233,030 5,750 224,250 22,425 201,825 191,734 10,091 40 Neighbourhood Park 8-128 2026 590,000 - 590,030 14,750 575,250 57,525 517,725 491,839 -2-5-,3-16- 41 Community Park a1 Recreation Centre II P-129 2028-2031 800,000 800,000 - - - - _ _ - _ 42 Village Green 8-130 2026 230,000 - 230,000 5,750 224,250 22,425 201,825 191,734 10,091 43 Neighbourhood Park P-131 2026 600,000 - 600,000 15,000 585,000 58,503 526,500 500,175 26,325 44 Village Green P-132 2028-2031 230,000 230,000. - - _ - - _ _ 45 Village Green P-133 2028-2031 210,000 210,000 - - _ _ _ _ _ 46 Neighbourhood Park P-134 2028-2031 700,000 700,000 - - _ _ _ _ _. 47 Neighbourhood Park P-135 2028-2031 560,000 560,000 - - - - _ uu_ 46 Village Green P-136 2028-2831 230,000 230,000 - _ - --� - _______ 49 49 Village Green P-137 2027 230,000 - 230,000 ----�-5.750----__---- 224,253 1--22,425 201,825 191,734 --- 10,091 50 Village Green P-128 2027 230,000 - 230,000 5,750 224,250 22,425 201,525 191,734 10,091 51 Village Green P-139 2027 300,000 - 300,000 7,500 292,500 29,250 263,250 250,088 -13,163- 52 - Village Green P-140 2026-2031 270,000 270,000 - - _ _ _ - --- 53 Community Park P-141 2326-2031 3,300,000 3,300,000- - _ _ _ 54 Neighbourhood Park P-142 2026-2031 590,000 890,000 - - _ _ _ _ __~""' 55 Vilage Green P-143 2028-2031 230003 230,000 - - _ - _ _ .r- 56 District Park (Phase 1) 8-144 2027 9,000000 - 9,000,300 225000 8,775,000 877,500 7,897,503 7,502.625 394,675 57 District Park (Phase 2) 8-144 2328-2031 9,000000 9,000,000 - - _ _ _ _ _ Traits - 58 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 major stream crossing T-1 2020 360,000 - 360,300 9,000 - 351,000 35,100 315,900 300,105 15795 59 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 minor stream crossing T -Z 2020 360,000 300,000 9,000 351,000 35,100 315,900 300,105 15,795 60 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 major stream crossing T-3 2021 410,000 - 410000 10,250 399,750 39,975 359,775 341,786 17,989 - 61 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 major stream crossing T-4 2021 380,000 - 380,000 9,500 370,500 37,050 333,450 316,778 16,673 62 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 2 major stream crossing T-5 2021 710,030 - 710,000 17,750 692,250 69,225623,025 501,874 31,151 63 -_ Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 2 major stream crossing T-6 2024 800,000 - 830,030 20,000 780;000 78,000 702,000 666,900 - 35,100- 64 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 minor stream crossing T-7 2024 370,030 - 370,030 9,250 380,750 36,075 324,675 308,441 15,234 55 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 2 major stream crossing 1-8 2026 930,030 - 930,030 23,250 906,750 90,675 816,075 775,271 40,834 86 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 minor stream crossing T-9 2022 140,000 - 140,030 3,500 136,500 13,650 122,850 116,708 6,143 67 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 major stream crossing T-13 2022 320,000 - 320,030 8,000 312,300 31,200 280,800 266,760 - 14,04.0- -- 68 - Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 major stream crossing T-11 2027 340,000 - 340,030 8,500 ---• 331.500 33,155 208,350 283,433 - 14,918 69 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 major stream crossing T-12 2020-2031 310,000 310,000 - - - - _ _ - - 70 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 major stream crossing 1-13 2028-2031 290,000 290,000T------___-___-___-____ _.__,.._�__.�__ 71 Seaton Primary Neighbourhood Connection Trails 1 major stream crossing 1-14 2028-2031 340,000 340,000 - - - - - - _ 72 Multi-purpose trarl - puffin Heights (Mettamy deft) to Ajax 2025 539,600 - 539,600 269,800 269,800 26,980 242,820 230,679 12,141 73 Multi-purpose trail- Hydra Corridor (Liverpool toWhites) T--------�-- 2019-2023 982,100 -ff-982,100 491,050 _-------_--491,050 49,105 441,945 _-_-419,848 22,097 74 Trail - Bayly Street from waterfront trail to Go Station 2019-2023 539,600 - 539,900 269,800 269,800 26,980 242,820 230,679 12,141- 75 Trail - Bayly Street from Go Station to Church Street 2019-2023 377,700 377,700 188,850 188,650 18,885 169,965 161,467 8,498 76 Trail - Finch t0 Brockridge Park (45m bridge) 2019-2023 917,300 - 917,300 458,650 458,650 45,865 412,785 392,146 20,639 77 Trail - Wharf Street to Sandy Beach Road 2019-2023 431,700 - 431,700 215,850 215,850 21,585 194,265 184,552 9,713 78 MuSit-pupose trail - Hydro Corridor (Whites to Townline) 2024-2027 1,618,800 - 1,618,800 809,400 809,400 80,940 728,460 652,337 36,423 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Prckering42017 DC Study(Report\Pickering DC Background Study-Finat.docx Page 33 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation - Parks and Recreation Services (Cont'd) prj.No Increased Serice Needs AttrtSutabie to Anticipated Development 2018-2027 Parks Code Timing (year) Gross Capita! Cost Estimate (20175) Post Period Benefit Net Capital Cos! Less: Subtotal Less: Other (e,g, 10% Statutory Deduction) Potential OC Recmerable Cost Benefit to Existing Development GranSubsidiests, and Other Contributions Attributable 10 New Development Total Residential Share 95% Non - Residential Share 5% Recreation Facilities 79 Seaton Recreation Complex 2020 75,000 - 75.000 1,875 73,125 7,313 65,613 62,522 3,291 2021 10,700,000 - 10,700,000 267,500 10,432,500 1.043,250 9,389,250 8,919,788 469,463 2022 42,800,300 - 42,800,000 1,070,000 41,730,000 4,173,000 37,557,000 35,679,150 1,877,850 -. f _---.-._-____��----.---__.-___-.---------...-hare-_-- ' 2023 2,600,006 - 2,600,000 65,000 2,535,000 253,500 2,281,500 2,167,425 114,075 80 Community Centre 2018 388,673 - 388,673 166,399 222,273 22,227 206,046 190,044 10,002 (Part of Pickering Heritage and Ccmmun€ty Centre) 2019 2,040,531 - 2,040,531 873,597 1,156,934 116,653 1,050,241 997,729 52,512 2021 916,152 - 916,152 192,417 723,736 72,374 651,362 618,794 32,558 2022 4,809,800 - 4,809,800 1,010,185 3,759,612 379,961 3,419,651 3,248,668 170,983 61 Youth & Seniors' Centre 2019 2,500,000 - 2,500,030 62500 2,437,500 243,750 2,193,750 2,084,063 199,688 2020 11,900,000 - 11,900,000 297,500 11,602,500 1.160,250 19,442,250 9,920,138 522,113 2021 11,900,000 - 11,900,000 297,500 11,602,500 1,160,250 10,442,250 9,920,138 522,113 82 Arts Centre (Community Uses) 2016-2027 6,497,300 - 5,497,000 162,425 6,334,575 633,458 5,701,118 5,416,062 285,056 Parks Operations Vehicles and Equipment - 83 Area Mower 2029 115,000 - 115,000 - 115,600 11,500 103,500 98,325 5,175 84 Area Mower (2) 2016-2027 230,000 - 230,000 - 230,000 23,000 207,000 196,650 10,350 _85 LitterPicker Vacuum-.�__.___- 2018 20300 ---��.- 30,000 �.�..-.��...- 30,0003,000 _'-----5,650-----"--'€,350' 27,000 2 _.� a6 �. Garbage Packer 2016-2027 150,300 - 150,000 - 150,000 15,000 135,000 128,250 6,750 87 Garbage Packer 2016 150,000 - 150,000 - 150,000 15,000 135,000 128,250 9,750 88 Enclosed Trailers (3) 2018-2027 36,000 - 35,000 - 36,000 3,500 32,409 30,760 1,620 89 Zero Tum Mower (6) 2019-2027 108,000 - 108,000 - 108,000 10,800 97,200 92,340 4,869 90 Pickup Trucks -(2) 2016-2027 74,000- 74,000 - 74.000 7,400 66,800 63,270 3,330 91 1 Ton Dump Tracks (2) 2016-2027 130,000- 130,000 - 130,000 13,000 117,000 111,150 5,850 92 SUV (2) 2018-2027 70,000- 70,000 - 70,000 7,000 63300 59.850 3,150 93 4Ton Dump Track 2018-2027 279,000 - 270,000 - 270,000 27,000 243,006 230,850 12,150 94 Utility Vehicle 2019 25,000- 25,000 - 25,000 2,500 22,506 21375 1,125 -Parks Operations Facilities - 95 -_... --96--- New Operations Centre (Growth Related Share) 20'€7 3,839,435 __.__ - ........._.._,.-._.__...__...._.....__....._._.___.. 3,839,435 __._._..__._.._.__.__..__...._ 3,839,435 3,639,435 3,647,463 191,872 96 New Northam Satellite Operations Centre, including land 2024 3,433,300- 3,433,300 - 3,433,300 343,330 3,385,970 2,935,472 154,499 Resent Fund Adjustment (16.528.412) (16,528,412) (15,701,991) (826,421) Total 176,947,192 17,360,000 159,587,192 16,677,152 - 127,381,629 14,007,060 113,374,567 107,705,839 5,668,728 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickenng12417 DC Study)Report(Prckenng DC Background Study-FinaLdocx Page 34 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation -- Library Services Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H.\PIckenngl2017 DC StudylReport\Prckerrng DC Background Study-Fina/.docx Less: Less: Potentia! DC Recoverable Cost Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Gross Capital Cost Post Period Net Capital Benefit to Grants, Subsidies and Other Other (e.g. Residential Non - Prj.No Development Timing (year) Estimate Benefit Cost Existing Contributions Subtotal 10% Total Share Residential (2017$) Development Attributable to Statutory Share New Deduction) Development 2018-2027 95% 5% Facilities 1 Central Library Facility 2018 1,750,000 1,750,000 447,454 1,302,546 130,255 1,172,292 1,113,677 58,615 2019 10,425,000 10,425,000 2,665,544 7,759,456 775,946 6,983,510 6,634,335 349,176 2020 10,425,000 10,425,000 2,665,544 7,759,456 775,946 6,983,510 6,634,335 349 176 2 Seaton Regional Library, including land (including material) 2021 4,138,000 1,801,303 2,336,697 103,450 2,233,247 223,325 2,009,923 1,909,426 100,496 2022 6,860,000 2,986,210 3,873,790 171,500 3,702,290 370,229 3,332,061 3,165,458 166,603 2023 6,861,000 2,986,645 3,874,355 171,525 3,702,830 370,283 3,332,547 3,165,919 166,627 3 Archives and Library Space 2018 612,454 612,454 - 612,454 61,245 551,208 523,648 27.560 (Part of Pickering Heritage and Community Centre) 2019 3,215,383 3,215,383 - 3,215,383 321,538 2,893,844 2,749,152 144,692 2021 61,449 61,449 - 61,449 6,145 55,304 52,539 2,765 2022 322,609 322,609 - 322,609 32,261 290,348 275,830 14,517 Reserve Fund Adjustment (2,798,782) (2,798,782) (2,658,843) (139,939) Total 44,670,894 7,774,158 36,896,737 6,225,017 - 27,872,937 3,067,172 24,805,766 23,565,477 1,240,288 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H.\PIckenngl2017 DC StudylReport\Prckerrng DC Background Study-Fina/.docx Page 35 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation - Administration Services Prj.No Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development - 2018-2027 Timing (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2017$) Post Period genu Net Capital Cost Less: Subtotal Less: Other (e.g. 10% Statutory Deduction) Potential DC Recoverable Cost Benefit to Existing Development ran s, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New •,,, Total Residential Share 78% Non - Residential Share 22% ® Development _.__..-Charges .........Background -...-.....Study ........... _.... Develo•ment Char.es Background Stud g 2022 2027 125,000 125,0 125,000 -.._-._._.......... 125,000 _......__....._.......000 ......._.... 125,000 12,500 --...-- .......__................500 12,500 112,500......... 87,750 7,75..........._... 67,750 24,750 24,750 South Pickering Intensification Study (Incl. Parks 45 2018-2020 400,000 400,000 100 DO r rrrrr 30,000 270,000 210,60D 59,400 South Pickering Heritage Inventory : •rrr 54,000 40,500 r r 1,35D 12,150 9,477 • Munic€pal Comprehensive Review500,000 500,000 125,000 375,000 r 337,500 263,250 r • Official Plan Reuew2027 250,000 250,000 125,00D 125,000 12,500 112,500 87,750 24,750 Comprehensive Zoning gy-law Review 2018-2021 r r rrr 431,700 25,000 107,925227,290 rrr 2,50D 22,53D 17,550 64,107 4,950 8 2318 Community Improvemen# Plans for Durham Live Lands and for City Centre Lands 2019-2022 rrrr rrrr 37,500 112,500 11,250 101,25D 78,975 22,275 r Infili and Replacement Housing in Established Neighborhoods r r rrrr rrrr 75,000 75,000 7,500 67,5DD 52,850 14,850 2018 60,000 60,00D 15,000 45,000 4,500 40,500 31,59D 8,910 Libra y- Librar�StrategicPian 018 r •rrr 60,000 rrr •r rrr rr 15,003 , .............. 45,000 .......... 4,05036,450 4,500 40,500 - • 31,590 8,019 5,910 r}, 2026 60,000 60,30D 15,000 45,000 4,500 40,500 31,590 8,910 2026 161,900 - 161,900 16,190 145,710 145,710 113,654 32,056 • Transportation Demand Management PIanlParking Management Plan (Seaton r25 161 • r r • r r16,190 145,710 145,710 113,554 32,055 17 Downtown Parking Strategy Study 2021-2022 r 90 107,900 r •r 97 110 9,711 87,399 68 171 19 228 Nei hbourhoodTrafficCalmingMeasures2018-2027 15r rrr 150,00D 15,00D 135,000 135,000 105,300 29,700 Transportation Master Plan Update2027 400,000 400 rrr 40,000 360,000 360,000 280,800 79,200 r Esplanade Study Provision 2018-2026 rrrr rrrr 12,500 37 500 3,750 33,750 26,325 7,425 21 Fire Master Plan 2019 134,900 rr 33,725 101,175r 22,259 Brock Industrial Drainage Master Plan 2018-2027 r r rrr - 300,000 30,000 270,000 270,000 210,600 59,400 23 Stormwater Management Study for Infill Development 2018-2027 : r r 215,800 53,950 161,850161,850 35,607 Frenchman's Bay Stormweter Management Master24 Plan U•date ' 2018-2027 rrrrr 700,000 rrrr rrrr 630,000 rrr 36,600 26 Pickering City Centre Stormwater Management25 Strategy_U.pdate ...._._.... ....-._....._._....- .....SWM User Fee Study...........................z._.....__...__.__ 2018-2027 018-2027 250,000 no,ODO 250,000 ...-..._-...---------...-. 200,000 25,000 100.000 225,000 _....._......._._....-.._-....-_...-..-.___...-.._-. 100,000 10,000 225,000 •rrrr 175,500 70,200 49,500 19,800 27 Pickering Airport Feasibility Study 2018 150,000 150,000 84,773 65,227 6,523 58,704 45,789 12,915 28 Pickering Corporate Energy Plan Update 2019 50,000 50,000 28,258 21,742 2,174 r • r 31 Seaton Co�orateEner Plan Update � PickeringClimate Ada tion Plan ....-.--..._...-...-_._....._......._..........2020_...-... Broadband Strategy and Implementation Plan 2022 rrrr rrrr , 150,000 :• 0 6522.............._.�6..-5._....- 65,227 5,000 6,523 • rrr 58,704 rr •rr 2019 75,060 MEM 75,000 42 387 32,613 3,261 29,352 22,895 0,457 32 Natural Capital Asset Evaluation 2022 75,000 - 75,000 42,387 32,613 3,261 29,352 22,895 6,457 33 Facilities Management Plan 2018 150,000 - 150,000 37,500 112,500 11,250 101,250 78,975 22,275 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:4Pickenhg42017 DC Study4ReportlPickering OC Background Study-Final.docx Page 36 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation - Administration Services (Cont'd) Prj.No Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated p 2018-2027)e��lnnmraet Timing (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2017$) Post period Benefit Nei Capital Cast Subtotal Less: Other (e.g. 10% Statutory Deduction) Potential DC Recoverable Cost Benefit to Existing Development ran s, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Total Residential Share 78% Nan - Residential Share 22% 34 Facilities Management Plan Update 2027 167,000 - 167,000 41,750 .125,250 12,525 87,926 24,600 35 " - 2018-2026 ++ r++ - 200,000 113,031 86,959 8,697 78,272 61,052 17,220 36 Findin Study Facilities Way 9 + +++ - 50,000 28,258 21,742 2,174 19,568 15,263 4,305 37 Space Use Study NM +++ - 35,000 26,250 8,750 875 7,875 6,143 1,733 38 Urban Forest Management 2018-2026 97,100 97,100 24,275 72,825 7,283 65,543 51,123 14,419 Seaton Primary Trails ID EA Phase 1 & 2 Lands includinsite walks, surae ing, archaeolo. 2018 1 400,000 400,000 400,000 40,000 360,000 280,800 79,200 40 Diversity and Inclusion Plan 2020 75,000 75,000 11111=511 42,387 32,613 3,261 3,261 29,352 29,352 22,895 22,895 6,457 6,457 41 Age Friendly Community Plan 2018 75,000 75,000 42 Seniors Recreation Strategic Plan 2019 75,000 75,000 ...................... . 37,500 37,500 3,750 33,750 26,325 7,425 43 Recreation Services Master Plan Update 2027 170,000 170,000 42,500 127,500 12,750 114,750 89,505 25,245 44 Waterfront Park Needs Assessment 2019-2020 100,000- 100,000 25,000 75,000 7,500 67,500 52,650 14,850 45 Whitevale Park Revitalization Study 2021 80,000- 80,000 20,000 60,000 6,000 54,000 42,120 11,880 46 New Financial System 2018-2026 5,000,000 5,000,000 IIMI 1,526,302 430,495 Reserve Fund Adjustment 673,868 673,868 525,617 148.259 Total 12,501,200 - 12,501,200 1 4,681,967 - 6,493,101 564,479 7,928,622 6,184,325 1,744,297 Watso , saciates Economists Ltd. H:Pickeringl2017 DC StudylReportlPickerrng DC Background Study -Final. docx Page 37 5.2 Service Levels and 14 -Year Capital Costs for City-wide D.C. Calculation 5.2, 7 Other Services Related to a Highway The City provides operations services related to transportation services, defined by the D.C.A. Services Related to a Highway. These services include roads operations facilities, vehicles, and equipment. These services are provided through the use of 181 vehicles and equipment items, and 52,700 sq.ft. of facility space. The average level of service provided over the historical 10 -year period based on this inventory is $223 per capita. When applied to anticipated growth over the 2018-20231 period, the per capita level of service produces a maximum D.C. eligible amount for library services of $19.4 million. The gross capital cost included in the D.C. calculation for the forecast period to 2031 totals $15.1 million. The capital cost estimates include additional vehicles and equipment items, as well as the growth -related share of the new Operations Centre and the Northern Satellite Operations Centre (including land). There is a current reserve fund balance of $154,000, recognizing the benefit to development having already occurred, which has been deducted from the D.C. eligible costs. The resulting net growth -related capital cost of approximately $15.0 million has been included in the D.C. calculation. The forecast growth -related costs have been allocated 74% to residential development and 26% to non-residential development (8% prestige employment lands within Seaton and 18% in all other areas of the City) based on the incremental growth in population and employment. 5.2.2 Stormwater Management Stormwater management needs provided in the increase in need for service reflect those in addition to the local service requirements of development, and include erosion control works, conveyance control, new facilities and water quality treatment. In total, the gross capital cost estimate for these needs over the 14 -year planning period total $52.3 million. After deducting approximately $41.5 for benefits to the existing development and $1.0 million for current reserve fund balances, the net D.C. eligible costs for inclusion in the calculation of the charge is approximately $9.9 million. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:IPickering12017 DC StudylReport\Pickering DC Background Study -Final. docx Page 38 Based on the incremental growth in population to employment, the net D.C.-eligible costs have been allocated 74% to residential, 8% to prestige employment lands within Seaton and 18% to non-residential development in all other areas of the City. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H.4Pickering12017 DC StudylReport\Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx M Page 39 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation - Other Services Related to a Highway Prj .No Encreased ServIce Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development 2018-2031 Timing (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2017$) Post Period Benefit Net Capital Cost Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total Residential Share 74% Non_ Residential Share 26% Roads Operations Fleet and Equipment 2 4 Ton Dump Truck/Snow Plow 2018 270,000 270,000 w 270,000 199,800 70,,200 1 _ 4 Ton Dump Truck/Snow Plow 2019-2027 270,000 _- 270,000 270,000 199,800 T � 70200 4 5 Ton Dump Truck/Snow Plow 2020 280.000 - 280,000„ 280,000 207,200 72,800 ,_, 3 _ 5 Ton Dump TrucklSnow Plow 2021-2027 275.000 ., - . 275,000 - 275,000 203,500 71,500 5 1 Ton Dump Truckm 195,000 _ 144,300 50,700 6 _-.__...-...__.. 1 Ton Dump Truck with Snow Plow (3) .2018-2027 2018-2027 ._. ..._195,000 210,000 __..._-.-....e..__ - _ 210,000 .-...__..__-....__... - _....195,000 210,000 155,400 54,600 7 Pickup Truck (_31____ 2018-2027 111,000 - 111,000 - 111,000 82,140 . 28,860 8 SUV 2018-2027 35,00035,000 - 35,000 25,900 9,100 9 Sweeper 2078 340,000 - 340,000 - 34D000 251,600 88,400 11 Sidewalk Tractors 2019 155,000 - 155,000 - 155,000 114,700 40,300 12 Sidewalk Tractors 2020 155,000 - 155,000 . - 155,000 114,700 40,300 10 Sidewalk Tractors 2021-2027 155,000 - 155,000 - 155,000 114,700 40,300 13 Provision for Vehicles & E ui ment 2028-2031 1,181,000 1,181,000 1,181,000 873.94D 307,060 Roads Operations Facilities 14 New Operations Centre (Growth Related 2017 6,067,565 - 6,067,565 6,067,565 4,489,998 1,577,567 Share 15 New Northern Satellite Operations Centre, including land 2024 5,426,000 - 5,426,000 - 5,426,000 4,015,240 1,410,760 ._......._..,..-...� _..�_.._._-.__...__. _..._....._.....__.._ ....._ ._......._.._..-_..-.__...___..__..._.�........__.-� _m.._...._...,._ __..._....._..�_-....._... Reserve Fund Ad'ustment - - - ( 153,919) _ (113, 900) _ ("4-07.6T9) Total 15,125,565 - 15,125,565 - - 14,971,647 11,079,019 3,892,628 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickerrng12017 DC Study\Report4Piokering DC Background Study-Pinai. docx • Page 40 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation - Stormwater Management Services Prj No Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development 2018-2031 Timing (year)(2017$) Gross Capital Cost Estimate Post Period Benefit Net Capital Cost Less: -------- Potential DC Recoverable Cast Benefit to Existing Dove€opment Grants, Subsidies and Other Cortrib4ti8ns Attributable to New Development Total Residential Share 74°4 Non -Residential Share 26% - - Krosno Creek SWM Facility K20- Design B-20 D SWM Facility at upstream of Krosno Ck trib. - Design 2018-2024 965,400 - 965,40D 532,008 483,392 342,910 120,482 Krosno Creek SWM Facility K20 -Construction B-20 C SWM Facility al upstream of Krosno Ck trip. - Construction 2018-2024 1,315,000 1,315;000 653,800 631,203 467,088 Krosno Creek SWM Facility K12 - Design 8-18 D SWM Facility at mouth of Hydro Marsh - Desi n_ ScWM onstruction Facility at mouth of Hydro Ma rsh- PP18-2024 2018-2024 78,403 488,200 78,400 488,203 40,768 253,864 37,632 27,848 9,784 Krosno Creek SWM Facility 412 - Construction i3-18 C 234,336 173,409 60,927 Restorations Bay Yacht Club Outfall Sediment Foretray Facility -wetland restoration 2016-2024 596,300 - 596,300 �� 149,076 110,316 38,763 D SWM Facilit at H Oro Marsh - Design Krosno Creek SWM Facility 418 - Construction 5-19 C SWM Facility at Hydro Marsh - Conruction 2018-2024 806,260 805,220 100,614 8 Krosno Greek 5WM Facility 419 - Design 6-30 D SWM Facility - Krosno Creek (Hydro Corridor, west of RuiyelY Sf.� -Desmon SWM Facility -Krosno Creek (Hydro Corridor, west of Quigely 5 Construction 2018-2024 2018-2024 2018-2024 458,900 1,760.200 324,600 458,900 1,760,200 324,600 238,628 915,304 168,792 IIIIIIIIII 220,272 844,696 155,508 163,001 625,223 115,298 Min 40,513 m 9 Krosno Creek SWM Facility 419 - Construction 6-30 C 1D T Krosno Creek SWM Facility 17118 - Design B-31 0 SWM Fac€€€ty -Krosno Creek (Hydro Corridor, west of Feldspar Cd.) - Design 11 Krosno Creek SWM Facility 17118 - B-31 C Construction SWM Facility -Kms no Creek (Hydro Corridor, west of Feldspar CR.) - Construction 2018-2024 1,569,400 1,569,400 816,088 753,312 557,451 ____ 195,861 Creek SWM Facility A3 - Design A-8 D 5WMCreek Facility at outfall to tributary of Ambedea - Des€en 2018-2024 129,100 129,100 102,192 26800 6,996 Petticoat Creek Erosion Control - Design H-10 0 Erosion assessment and fixing of erosion channel and banks 2018-2024 302,200 322.200 268,061 34,139 •Amberlea Petticoat Creek Erosion Control -Construction H-10 C. Erosion assessment and Axing of erosion channel and banks 2018-2024 1,919,200 1,919,200 1,702,391 IIIIIIIIIII 216,809 163,435 56,376 Petticoat Creek & 05€On Control - Design g Erosion assessment and Axing of erosion Channel and banks 2018-2024 258,200 - 358,200MEI 45,824 33,318 11,708 Erosion assessment and Axing of erosion 055009iand banks 2015-2024 2,555,200 2.555,200 2,234.321 237,873 83,507 ®14 oil Grit Separators Installation install 2 units per year for water quality treatment 2018-2024 4,213,100 4,213,100 3,018,755 313.533 18 12 Oii Gilt Separators Installation '65±8112 units per year for water qualify treatment 2025-2031 3,611,300 3,611,300 2,567,555 1,023,745 757,571 255,174 19_ 20 Am5edea Creek Mouth SWM Facility - Design W-7 D SWMIForebay Faciliy to FB - Design SWMIForebay Faciliy to 713 - Construction 2025-2031 2025-2031 712500 7,951,200 710,800 618,398 6,926,244 mm�924°4 1,234,956 _ 68,379 765,857 24,025 259.059 Ambedea Creek Mouth SWM Facility - W-7 C Construction 7,551,200 21 22 23 .._...,.._. 24 Dunbarton Greek Mouth SWM Facility - Design W-8 0 SWMIForebay Faciliy to 713 - Design 2025-2231 2025-2031 2025-2031 -----.,__ 2025-2031 20252031 710,800 7,961,200 1,350 850 _._._. 138,700 1,460,300 710,800 7,051,20D 1,350,609. ----'-'--"---; 138,700 1,450,000 518,396 6,926,244 1,069,097 _.......,....,..--,- 120,669 1,278,200 92,404 1,034,966 ____ _ _ 281, 503 _._._.--. 18031 189,803 68,279 765,867 24,025 259,089 73,191 ._-m-....._.._._..,_.. 4.688 49,348 Dunbarton Creek Mouth WO Facility - W-8 C Construction SWMIForebay Faciliy to FB - Construction Amberlea Creek SWM Facility A3 - Construction A-8 Cm SWM Facility at o to tributary of Amtredea Creek - Construction -_.-_,- 208,312 -....-_.._,.-..-m....-_. 12,343 140,452 ._.....-..,...._. Pine Creek SWM Facility P31 -Design L-25 D SWM Facility at Duffel'toP.._._.. tY Pine Creek at Glenanna Rd. -DesEln FacilHd.ity atConstrucoutfall totiPine Creek at GlWM enanna -on 25 Pine Creek SWM Facility P31 - Construction L-20 C Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 1-k4Prckerrng12017 DC StudylReport\Prckerrng DC Background Study-FtnaLdocx Page 41 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation — Stormwater Management Services (Cont'd) Pp.No Increased Senrice Needs Attributable 10 Anticipated Development 2018-2031 liming (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2017$) Post Period Benefit Net Capital Cost Poten0al DC Recoverable Cost benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and other Cantribukions Attributable to New Development Total Residential Share 74y Non -Residential Share 26% En Pine Creek SWM Facility 029 -Design 8.33 D SWM Facility at outlet of Pine Creek at Fairview Ave. - Design 2025-2031 78,4!70 MI ...78,460 68,208 10,192MCI 2,050 IllE=11 SWM CacionlltRE at outlet at outlet of Pine Creek at FairviewAye, - 2026-2031 699,300 - 699.300 608,391 90,909 EICE 23,636 Pine Creek SWM Facility 022- Design L-21 0 a SWM Facility outlet of Pine Creek at Cedanvocd Cit. - Desi •n 2025-2031 123.100Ell 123,130 107087 16,003 11642 11:111111SWM • Facility at outlet of Pine Creek at Cedarwood Cd. - Construction 2025-2031 1,283.200Ell 1,263,200 30 Pine Creek SWM Facility P27 -Design L-22 0 SWM Facility at outlet of Pine Creek at Storein•,tOn St. - Aesi.n 20252031 134,300 134,300 -® 12.920 Mil SWM Facility at outlet of Pine Creek at Storrin•ton St. - Construction 2025-2031 . -1,410,400 - 1,410,400 1,227,046Millill 163352 135,680 MEI Pine Creek Culvert Replacements -Design TC -23 D Pine Creek Culvert Replacements - TC -23 C Construction culvReplaceert, Radomchannel Stworks culverts, Kingston Rd Replace Radom St Culverts, Kingston Rd culvert, channel works 2025-2031 2025-2031 711,800 6,053,200 Eill 711,900 6,053,200 021,309 5,283,660 93,491 759,540 66,963 23,528 569,459 200,080 IIMIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIMIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIMIIMIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �� MIININIM ��� Reserve Fund Ad'ustmanl 1111110331311111163M • 363.856 11111111111 allIll.IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11.1M1.111111 • 52,319,100 52,319,100 41,452,260 9,890,469 7,318,947 2,571,522 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Prckering12017 DC Study\Report1Pickerrng DC Background Study -Final. docx Page 42 5.3 Service Levels and 14 -Year Capital Costs for Area -Specific (Outside of Seaton Lands) D.C. Calculation 5.3.1 Transportation Services The City has a current inventory of 159 kilometres of rural, arterial and collector roads and urban collector and arterial roads and 62 bridges and culverts. This historic level of infrastructure investment equates to a level of service of $2,577 per capita. Furthermore, the City also provides services through the maintenance of 315 kms of sidewalks and 25 traffic signals. In total, average historic level of service provided is $3,487. When applied to the forecast population growth to 2031 (i.e. 28,936 incremental net -population growth outside of Seaton), a maximum D.C.-eligible cost of approximately $100.9 million could be expected to meet the future increase in needs for service. The review of the City's transportation needs for the forecast period identified $123.9 million in gross capital costs. These capital needs include various road re- constructions, widenings and extensions, sidewalks, traffic signals, and streetlighting projects. Recognizing the benefit to existing development, approximately $38.0 million has been deducted. Approximately $18.2 million has been deducted from the potential D.C. recoverable costs for existing reserve fund balances, accounting for funds already secured towards these future needs. As a result, approximately $67.6 million in capital costs have been included in the D.C. calculation. The net growth -related costs for transportation services have been allocated between future residential and non-residential development outside of Seaton on the basis of incremental population to employment growth over the forecast period (Le. 92% residential, 8% non-residential). Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering12017 DC Study\Repont'Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 43 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation - Transportation Services Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering12017 DC StudylReport\Pickering DC Background Study -Final. docx Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development 2016-2031 Roads Code Timing (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (20175) Post Period Benefit Net Capital Cost Potential DC Recoverable Cost Benefit to Existing Development Grants. Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Develo.ment Total Residential Share 92% Non - Residential Share 8% . Roads �..11.1.111. 11111.11111.11111.1111111 Tillin•s Road oversizin• -local to collector C 2010-2024 294,000 294,800 29,480 r 244,094 � William Jackson Dri,e- Urfe Creek to Taunton Road Urbanization, pedestrian trail DH -13 2018-2024 2,226040 - 2,229,040 222,904 3,250,000 28,000 2,006,136 3.250,000 259,200 1_,845_0645 2,990,00 238,464 160,491 250,000 Sand Beach Road 3-1805 urban reconstruction, incl. storm Oversizin• -local to collector 8-29 DH -4 2918-2024 2018-2024 6,500,000 288,000 1111111111011 6,500,000 288,000 4 DH -4 Vail- Farm Rd.-Tillin•s Road to Brock Rd DH -14 William Jackson Dr. (Old Taunton). Urfa Creek Culvert Structure LpeslgniApproval}, EA & Design Construction DH -14 DH -14 DH -1 2018-2924 2018-2024 450,000 3,455,100 3,399,500 450,000 3,455,100 3,399,500 500 45,000 345,510 339,950 405,000 3,109,590 _ 3,059,550 372,600 2,860,823 __ 2,814,786_ 706 32,400 248,767 DH -14 Wil[IarsJackson Dr. {Ol4Taunton}. Urfa Creek Culvert Structure (Construction) { - -- __ -- Dalley Farm Road -North of Third Concession to Valley Falun-Road Tillin•s Slane urban construction, incl. storm 2020-2024 • Rivers-._. p West Limit T n Drive - Hoover t....�.......m-w..- 2 -lane urban reconstruction R0-3 -....-...„.._ RP -4 2025-2031 2018-2024 2,2101000 1,850,300 2,210,000 _._. 1,850,300 1,657,500 ._._.....-� 462,575 _..,-__._._.......,.�................. 552,500 1,387,725 508300 1,276,707 44200 111,018 Finch Avenue-Towniine to Altona ----•--- - ----._. 3 -lane urtan reconstruction, incl. storm 10 Pickerin• Parkwa-Glenanna to H dro Comdar E sidewalk 2018-2024 54,100 - 54,100 40,575 13,525 12,443 11 Diefenbaker Extorsion - East Limit to Pickering Parkwa - 2025-2031 750,000 750,000 562,500 187.500 172,500 15000 Notion Road - Kingston 10 350m South 2 -lane urban reconstruction, incl. Storm V-5 2018-2024 1,052,500 1,052,500 525,250 526,250 484,150 n �Y 42,100 She aril Avenue- Whites to West Limit sidewalk, blvd., street] ht on north side W0-.5 2018-2024 244000 244.000 183,000 61000 56,120 4,880 Sheppard Avenue - Whites to 600m East sidewalk, blvd., structures south side WO -9 2018-2024 395,000 111111M. 395,000 295250_ 98,750 90 850 7,900 Audle Road Sideline 2 Conc. 55 to I-1 7 2 -lane rural reconstruction inch structures RU -02018-2024 3,212,155 3,212,155 1,606,078 1,506.078 1,477,591 128486 _ 17 A-5, Ate, A-7 Arterial Connection Bayly to Kingston -5, A -[on Rd. Feasibility Study & EA i y 10-31 0-4 2018-2024 2018-2024 2,698,000 323,150 2,698,000 �:� 674,500 _ 242,363 2,023,500 _ 80,788 1,861- ""-74620 __ 161,880 6,463 Walkwa Dunbarton to Rambleber -- walkwa,325 ��a- urYTm•.r.11„i•�� 9 5 469,037 76,273 • r Valle Farm/Tillln s Bridgee-Genetsekia•on �„9 g40,919 New Structure OH -2 2020-2024 2018-2024 13 489,900 1,435,750 � 13,489.900 1,435,750 1,048,990 717,875 12 110,910 'FIT, 11,159,637 650 445 971,273 r ,}' Oakwood Drive- Rougemount to Mountain Ash 2 -lane urban reconstruction R -4a Oakwood Drive - Mountain Ash to To nevale 2 -lane urban reconstruction, incl. stomp 2018-2024 718,225 718,225 359,113 359,113 330,084 Rou•emount Drive - Wood •ran •e to To revels 2 -lane urban reconstruction, Incl. storm 2018-2024 -2018-2024 2024 285,280 1,000,000 866,800 285,280 1,000,000 656.600 142,640 500,000 433,400 142,540 500.000 433,400 11111MOMIIMEal 460,000 398,728 40,060 34,672 Finch Avenue - West of Altona (Structure) culvert re•lacement reconstruction/widen2018 ScarlPicker€n. Towniine -Finch to CPR Scar/Pickerin•Towniine - CPR to TauntorlSfeeles reconstruction/widen RU -7 2018-2024 5,634,200 5,634,200 2,817,100 2,817.100 2,591,732 225,368 Dixie Road-Kln.stonto South Limit - - •- •- 2018-2024 54,100 54,100 �® ®� 1,082 ®Granite Court - Whites to Rosebank sidewalk, north side 2018-2024 207,085 207,085 155 314 47,630 4,142 NEN Kellina Street - S •uires Beach to Church 3 -lane urban reconstruction, incl. storm B 20 9 ,236,50[3 2,236,500 1,118 250 1,118,250 1,028,790 89,460 29 30 Squi2s Beach Road - Bayry to CNR Tracks Tracks 3 -lane urban reconstruction, incl. storm c.._-_._-_._.._... 81-16 2019 500 2,236,509 1,986,000 2,158,400 � ,500 2,236,890 1,386,000 2,158,400 1,118,250 1.110,250 1,469,500 1,518,800 1,028,790 �._.__._._. 1,370,340 1 1,489,296 89,460 119,160 129,504 -----1-(- ---..-.eT., A-11 (Plummer - H dro Corridor to West Lund Collector Road Brid•e Structure .-__.......... 9-27 B-28 2021 2021 496,500 539,600 12 11tH ir.vyvm�r�=laiitu�.� i.n NMRosebankRoad - CPRtoThirdConcessionRd. reconstruction/Widen 4278,250 4,278,250 1,069,563 3,205,688 2,951,993 256,695 33 RasebankRead - Third Concession Rd. To Taunton d. reconstruction/widen 12025-2031 2025-2631 3,137,920 3,137,920 784,480 2,353,440 2,165,165 188,275 ®Montgomery Park Rd. -Sandy Beach Rd. To Mcka Rd. Urbanization !Full Load 2018-2024 3,710,000 3,710,000 1,855,000 1,855,000 1,706,600 146,400 ®Third Concession Rd. - Dixie Rd. To Whiles Rd. Reconstruction/widen MEMr • 4,564371 4,564,371 1,141,093 1.11111111111111111111EMEI 3,149,416 MEM 36 Third Concession Rd. - Whites Rd. To Altona Rd. 2025-2031 4,564,371 4,554,371 1,141,093 3,423,278 3,149,416 273,862 ®Third Concession Rd. -Altana Rd. To West Towniine �Rec��onstruction/widen 2025-2031 ®= 4,564,371 1,141,093 �ME 3.149,416 = 38 ® Fainort Rd. - L no Heights To Third Concession Rd. Dixie Rd. - H dro Corridor To Third Concession Rd. Reconstructionlwiden Reconstruction/wider IMAM L-16 2025-2031 2025-2031 4,279,080 3,993,800 - MIIIMII 4,279,080 3,993,800 1,069,770 998,450 illIllIllIllIllMMIIIII 3,209,310 2,995,350 2,952,565 256,745 239,620 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering12017 DC StudylReport\Pickering DC Background Study -Final. docx Page 44 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation - Transportation Services (Cont'd) Pq .No Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated DevelopmentPost 2018-2031 Roads Code Timing (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (20175) Period Benefit Net Capital CostResidential Potential DC Recoverable Cost Benefit to Existing Development Granas, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Develo.meat Total Residential Share 92% Nan - Share 8 A -B (Plummer) -Brock Rd. To West Limit Collector 8-24 2025-2031 59,900 60,900 1111013E� 52,425 46,231 4 194 41 A-9 )iumme (_ Exit West Limit To Hydro Corridor Collector B-25 8-25 2025-2031 2025-2031 356,000 550.000 - 366,000 550,000 91,500 137,500 274,500 412,500 252,540 379,500 21960 33000 42 A-10 (Plummer) -Across Hydro Corridor Collector 43 Walnut Lane Extension -construction and contract admin 2019 2,500.000 2,500,000 625,000 1.875.000 1,725.000 150,000 44 Walnut Lane Extension -EA and la0j rr 2010 211,226 MEM 211,226 500,000 IIIIIEIMNIIIIIIIMII 125,000 158,420 375,000 145,746 345,000 12,674 30 000 45 ______-_ EA Stud A8-Al2 Plummer 8-24 to 5-28 11111111111111 2018-2024 500,000 -■r�I��■ -_. �Streetli.htsand Sidewalks �111111110111111111111111111111111111111111111111.1.11 - �WD -2 Kingston Road - South Side Rosebank Rd. to Stee.Ie Hill Kinston Road - Glendale Drive to Walnut Lane North side1111111111111 W0-2 2018-2024 r r 352,660 332,660 166,330 11111111111 165,330 153.024 13,306 351,000 351,003 175,500 161,460 14,040 48 Kinston Road- Dixie Road toLiverpool Road �- ������� ���2018-2024 R0-10 2018-2024 505,000 103,283 MOM INN 585,000 103,203 292,500 51.642 _ 292, 500 51,642 269,100 47,510 23,400 Sidewalk 8,, Streetlights: Rosebank to Whiles ES 2000 50-10 Rosebank to 250 m west Sidewalks & Streetlights TC -7 (2005-2309) Kingston Rd. - Valley Farm Rd. East (south sid5) to Hydro Corridor. TC -7 2018-2024 2025-2031 133,500 112,000 133,500 65,750 66,753 56,002 61,410 51,520 5,340 Si owelkOs1 in Streetlights. NEE. Quadrant Delta BIW 0Sidewalks WO -1 112,000 55,000 _ 4,480 F. Streetlights: Kingston Rd. Steeple Hill to Whites 04-2321-002-03 WO -3 2018 317,000 111111 317,000 158,500 - 158,500 145,820 12,660 Sidewalks & Streetlights, KingstonfDixie-CNR tracks TC -11 2025-2031 133,500 133;500 66,750 MI. 66,750 25,000 61,410 23,000 5,340 Streetlights & Sidewalks Brock Road -both sides-Forbrock Rd. to Taunton Road. DH -24 2016-2024 50,000 50,000 25,000 2,000 i®ed o - Valley Farm Road (Bast Side) Kingston Road to 100m South - Sidow5k/Blul. in conjunction with adacent develo.ment. 2018-2024 111:115111. 26,889 24,737 2,151 Es 57 Kingston Road -West Limit of Neighbourhood 7 to Dixie Road north side 0-1 2018-2024 570,000- 570,000 285,000 205,000 262,200 .. ----- 22.800 Kingston Road -West Limit to East Limit of Nei•hbourhood 7 Fairort to CN bride south side. C-2 2018-2024 =I= 347,266 347268 319,466 27.789 Finch Avenue - Spruce Hill to East Limit of Nei.hbourhood 9 0_9 2018-2024 285,000 285,000 142,500 142,500 131,100 11,400 59 Finch Avenue - Spruce Hill to Fairport Road south side 0-10 2018-2024 253,000 253,000 126.500 157,825 12_ 826 500 1575 116.380 145,199 10120 12 626 60 Finch Avenue - Brock Road to H dro Corridor north side V-12 2018-2024 315.650 315,650 61 W r - R.-. -G _ - C 401 west side W-5 2018-2024 95,000 95,000 47,500 47,500 43,700 9,803 Whites Road - North of 3rd Concession to Taunton Road _ sidewalk, multi -use trail, streetlight multi -use S 2018-2024 2010-2024 1,153,000 1 741 100 1,153,000 1,741,100 57,650 1,095350 1,007,722 87628 Wlli 6R ad- r1' 1S -•t. 8 ..i 174,114 1,566,990 1,441,631 125,359 64 55 Wh€tesRoad -Bridga over west DefFnsCreek streetli titin RU -9 Bl -4 RU -12 2018-2324 -609,430 1,861,600 389.600 - 809,400 1,861,600 389,600 40,470 930,800 58,440 768930707,416 930,800 331,160 056,335 304.667 61,514 74,464 26,493 Brock Road - BaylyStreet to Mort9omery Road East and West Sides sidewalk/streetlights 2018-2024 2010-2024 66 Sideline 24 -Hwy 7 south to north [unit of subdivision Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering12017 DC Study4Report\Pickering DC Background Study -Final. docx Page 45 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation - Transportation Services (Cont'd) Prj .No Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development 20182031 Roads Code Timing (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (20175) Post Period Benefit Net Capital Cost Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total Residential Share 925 Non - Residentia€ Share 8% 67 Whites Rd. GPR Overpass sidewalklstreellighis A5 2018-2024 269 800269,800 40,470 229,330 219,984 1B, 346 68 Bayly Street - Church Street to West Limit Neighbourhood 4 Hwy 7 - Brock Rd to West Townline Church Street - Bayly Street to Kellino Street north and south sides Sidewelklstreetlights north side west side 5I-1 RU -10 BI -17 2018-2024 2018-2024 2018-2024 1,162;300 1,250;800 325.000- - - 1,162,300 1,250,800 325,000 501,150 187,520 162,500 581,150 1,063180 162,500 534,656 978,126 149,500 46,492 __ -3-5-0-5 13,000 69 70 71 Altana Road - Sirouds Lane to North Limit of Neighbourhood 10 Finch Avenue -West Limit of Neighbourhood 7 to DuncannonDr. east and west sides north side H1 L-6 2018-2024 2018-2024 1,300,009- 150,000 - 1,300,000 150,000 650,000 75,000 660,000 75,000 598,000 69,000 52,002 6,000 72 7 nch3 FiAvenueHai�ghts-to East 80m north side - L-7 2018-2024 40,000 - 40,000 20 00 20,000 18,400 _ �~ 1 600 _ 74 Finch Avenue -Valley Fann Road to West 600m south side L-9 2018-2024 300,000 - 300,000 150 000 150,000 138000 12 000 75 76 Finch Avenue - VaEle Farm Road to East 30Qm ,Finch �. _ 0m-•-'-'- Finch Avenue -Altona Road to Rosebank Road north side d L-10 2 - 150,000 150,000 250,000 75,000 125,000 -•- -•--.._.„.„„„ 5 DO 75 000 125,000 59 000 6.0_00 south side RP -6 ..._.- ,...•.,..1 2018-2024 250,000 _......._._.___-__._._._,..-------- - 115,000 _ _ 10.000 77 Finch Avenue - Rosebank Road to 500m West north side RP -5 2018-2024 250,000 - 250,000 125,b00 125,000 115,500 10 000 76 Altona Road - Finch Avenue to Hydro Corridor (N) east side - RP -9 2018-2024 150,000 - 150,000 75,500 75,000 59,000 6 000 79 Altona Road - Finch Avenue to North Limit of Neighbourhood 14 west side RP -10 2018-2024 150,000 - 150,003 75,000 75,000 69,000 6,000 8p Altana Road -Finch Avenue to North Limit of Neighbourhood 14 North Road -Hwy 7 south to north limit of subdivision east side sidewalklstreetiights RP -11 RU -11 20182024 20182024 150,000 500,000 - - 150,000 500,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 425,000 69,000 • 391,000 5,000 34,000 81 82 Whiievale Road - Aitona Road to York/Durham Townine sidewalk/streetlights/multi-use trail RU -14 2018-2024 675,009- 575,020 101,250 573,750 527,050 45,900 83 Taunton Rd. -Sideline 15 to Church St. sidewelkfetreetiightslmulti-use trail RU -17 2025-2031 375,000 - 375,000 56,250 318,750 2,103,750 293,250 1,935,450 25,500 168,300 35 060 84 85 Taunton Rd. _ Whites Rd. ToWestTownline sidewalklstreet[ightslmuiti-usetrail RU -18 2025-2031 2,475,000 905,000 - - 2,475,000 900,000 371,250 450,000 South Esplanade Pedestrian Malt walkway 2025-2031 450,000 414,000 86 Kingston Road - Fronting 820 Kingston Road to Fairport Rd North Side (455m) . WO -10 2016-2024 270,000- 270000 - 135,000 135,000 124,200 10,600 07 Kingston Road - Rougemount Drive to 300m west North Side RO-12 2010-2024 175,500 - 175,500 87,750 87,750 80,730 7,020 Traffic Signals 88 Pickering Parkway at Glenanna Rd.-Signalizetion TC -4 2010-2024 300,000 - 300,000 30,000 270,000 248,400 21,600 09 Glenanna Road at Fairport Road Sidealization 0-8 2018-2024 300,000 - 300,000 30,000 270,000 248,400 21,600 90 Welrus Street at Fairport Road Signalization D-12 2018-2024 300,000 - 300000 30,000 270,000 248,400 21,600 91 92 Rosebank Road at ShepperdAvenue - Rosebank Road at Hi.5 New Roect'Deerhasen Lane Jog eiimination!Signatzat€on 5 EA Si.nelization WO -6 A5 m.. 2016-2024 _ 700,000- 300,000 - 700,000 70,000 __- 630,000 270,000 -_- 579,600ry 248,400 60,400 21,600 2019-2024 300,000 30,000 93 5trouds Lane atAS•en RoeStS had brook Ddve SI•nalizatioD A-7 2025-2031 660,060 - 500 800 60,000 540,000 496,8130 43 200 94 Finch Avenue at Woodview Avenue ....._ ..................•..t ___._._._..._.,..... igna €nation RP -1 300,000 - 3 000 30,00 0,•ry 270,000 240 8,40 2,0 ....,-, .-...._._._...µ._., .._._._._._._ _•_•_ r.W ry mm_160 Resents Fund Adjustment (18,249,536) 06,789,5731 (1,459,9631 Total 123,911,679 - 123,911,679 38,027,825 - 67,634,318 62,223,572 5 410,745 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. N:4Pickerng42017 DC StudylReport(Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 46 6. D.C. Calculation Tables 6-1 to 6-3 present the D.C. quantum calculation (pre -cash flow) for the growth - related capital costs identified in Chapter 5. Table 6-1 presents the area -specific D.C. calculation for Transportation Services (applicable outside of the Seaton lands), Table 6-2 presents the D.C. calculation for City-wide services over the 14 -year period (i.e. 2018-2031), and presented in Table 6-3 are the calculated D.C.s for City-wide services over the 10 -year planning horizon (i.e. 2018-2027). Table 6-4 summarizes the quantum calculation of maximum D.C.s by residential dwelling type, per net hectare for non- residential development within the Seaton prestige employment lands, and per square foot of gross floor area for non-residential development in all other areas of the City. The calculations of the maximum D.C.s that could be imposed by Council have been undertaken based on a cash flow analysis to account for the timing of revenues and expenditures and the resultant financing needs. The cash flow calculations have been undertaken by service for each forecast development type, i.e. residential, prestige employment lands within Seaton and non-residential development in all other areas of the City. Detailed D.C. cash flow calculations are provided in Appendix C. The cash flow calculates interest paid/received on reserve fund balances to account for the differences in timing of projects and when development is anticipated to occur. In - year transactions are reduced by 1/2 to reflect D.C. contributions and expenditures occurring at different times throughout the year. For cashflow purposes, capital costs and. D.C.s are indexed at 3% annually, debt is calculated at 5% and investment return is calculated at 2.5%. Moreover, the cash flow calculations include the interest costs the anticipated financing of the New Operations Centre that is currently under construction, assumed at 3.5% interest and 10 -year term. Table 6-5 provides the calculated schedule of charges to be imposed on January 1, 2018 (2018$) using the cashflow method. For the residential calculations, charges are calculated on a single detached unit equivalent basis and converted to four forms of dwelling unit types (single and semi- detached, apartments 2 bedrooms and larger, bachelor and 1 bedroom apartments, and other multiples). The non-residential D.C. for the Seaton prestige employment lands has been calculated on a per net hectare basis. The non-residential D.C. for development in all other areas of the City has been calculated on a per square foot of gross floor area basis. Watson & Associates economists Ltd. H:4Pickering12017 DC Study4Report'Pickering DC Background Study -Final, docx Page 47 Tables 6-6 and 6-7 compare the City's existing charges (inflated to 2018$ at 3%) to the charges proposed herein (Table 6-5), for single detached residential and non-residential development respectively. Table 6-1 D.C. Calculation Area -Specific Services 2018 — 2031 SERVICE 2017 $ DC Eligible Cost 2017 $ DC Eli.ible Cost Residential Non -Residential SOU .er1N Nan -Residential $ $ $ $ 1. Transportation 62,223,572 5,410,745 6,222 1.75 TOTAL 62 223,572 5 410,745 6,222 1.75 3,385 0.09 3. Other SerIces Related 10 e Highway 11,079,019 1,270,752 2,621,876 DC ELIGIBLE CAPITAL COST 562,223,572 65,410 745 14 ear Gross Po.ulation 1 GFA Growth IP. 35,302 3,090,862 696 8,509 Cost Per Capital Non -Residential GFA (R'.) 51,762.61 $1.75 By Residential Unit Tyne gal DC ELIGIBLE CAPITAL COST Single and Semi -Detached Dwelling 3.53 56,222 14 Year Gross Population 1 Net Hectares / GRA Growth Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + 2.23 $3,931 Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom 1.58 52,785 Cost Per Capita 1 Non -Residential GFA (IP.) Other Multiples 2.85 $5,023 Special Care/Special Dwelling Units 1.00 $1,763 By Residential Unit Him c,,,.T.0 Table 6-2 D.C. Calculation Municipal -Wide Services 2018 — 2031 SERVICE 2017 $ DC Eligible Cost 2017 $ DC Eligible Cost Residential Non -Residential SDU. Nan -Residential Seaton Prestige Employment Land Other Pickering Non -Residential Seaton Prestige Employment Land per net hectare Other Pickering Non-Res-:dentlai per B' $ $ 5 5 2. Stormwater Management 7,318947 839,476 1,732,048 277 3,385 0.09 3. Other SerIces Related 10 e Highway 11,079,019 1,270,752 2,621,876 410 5,124 0.14 TOTAL 18,397,966 2.110,228 4,353,922 696 8,509 0.23 DC ELIGIBLE CAPITAL COST 510,397,956 $2,110,228 54,353,922 14 Year Gross Population 1 Net Hectares / GRA Growth 93,333 248 18,745,935 Cost Per Capita 1 Non -Residential GFA (IP.) • 6197.12 58,509 $0.23 By Residential Unit Him c,,,.T.0 Single and Semi -Detached Dwelling 3.53 $696 Apartments - 2 Bedrooms 1- 223 5440 Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom '1.58 $311 Other Multiples 2.85 5562 Special Care/Special Dwelling Units 1.00 $197 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. .H: IPickeringl2017 DC StudylReport\Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 48 Table 6-3 D.C. Calculation Municipal -Wide Services 2018 — 2027 SERVICE 2017 $ DC Eligible Cost 2017 $ DC Eligible Cost Residential Non -Residential SDU Non -Residential Seaton Prestige Employment Land Other Pickering Non -Residential Seaton Prestige Employment Land per net hectare Other Pickering Non -Residential per ft' $ 5 $ $ 4. Protection Services 19,579,125 1,980,597 3,541,720 841 10,781 D.32 5. Parks and Recreation Services 107,705,839 2,033,108 3,635,621 4,628 11,067 0.32 6. Library Services - 23565,477 444,833 795,455 1,013 2,421 0.07 7. Administration Studies 6,184,325 625,598 1,118,699 + 266 3,405 D.10 TOTAL 5157,034,785 85084,136 $9,091,495 56,748 527,678 80.81 UC ELIGIBLE CAPITAL COST _ 5157,034,766 55,084,136 99,091,495 10 Year Gross Population / Net Hectares / GFA Growth 82,153 184 11,185,194 Cost Per Capita 1 NonResidentialGFA (4.) $1,911.49 527,675.74 50.81 Sv Residential Uuit Tvoe o.o.0 Single and Semi -Detached Dwelling 3.53 56,748 Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + 2.23 $4,263 Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom 1.58 $3,020 Other Multiples 2.85 $5,448 Special Care/Specia€ Duelling Units 1,00 51,911 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H: 4Pickering\2017 DC Study\Report Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 49 Table 6-4 • Calculated Schedule of Charges (Quantum, 2017$) Service RESIDENTIAL NON-RESIDENTIAL Single and. Semi- Detached Dwelling Apartments- 2 Bedrooms + Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom Other Multiples (perit' of Total Floor 2 Area) (per net Ha ofPresti e g Employment Land in Seaton) Municipal Wide Services: Other Services Related to a Highway 419 265 188 338 0.14 5,124 Protection Semites 841 531 376 679 0.32 10,781 Pants and Recreation Services 4,628 2,924 2,071 3,736 0.32 11,067 Library Services 1,013 640 453 818 0.07 2,421 Administration Studies 266 168 119 215 0.10 3,405 Stormwater Management 277 175 124 224 0.09 3,385 Total Municipal Wide Services 7,444 4,703 3,331 6,010 1.04 36,185 Outside of Seaton Lands Transportation 1 6,222 3,931 2,785 5,023 1.75 Total Services Outside of Seaton Lands 6,222 3,931 2,785 5,023 1.75 Seaton 7,444 4,703 3,331 6,010 1.04 36,185 Rest ofPickerrng 13,666 8,634 6,116 11,033 2.79 36,185 1. Subject to a separate agreement outside of the Development Charges Act concerning the provision of Transportation requirements in addition to other funding contributions 2. Does not apply to prestige employment development in Seaton, as that development is subject to the per net Ha land area charge instead. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H: 4Pickering12017 DC Study\ReportlPickering DC Background Study -Final. docx Page 50 Table 6-5 Calculated Schedule of Charges (Cash Flow, 2018$) Service RESIDENTIAL NON-RESIDENTIAL Single and Semi- Detached.1-and Dwelling Apartments - 2 Bedrooms Apartments - Bachelor 1 Bedroom Other Multiples (per ft' of Total Floor Area) z (per net Ha of Prestige Employment Land in Seaton) Municipal Wide Services: Other Seruces Related to a Highway 441 279 197 356 0.15 5,451 Protection Services 889 562 398 718 0.34 11,431 Parks and Recreation Services 4,851 3,065 2,171 3,917 0.39 13,261 Library Services 1,086 686 486 877 0.08 2,605 Administration Studies 277 175 124 224 0.10 3,560 Stormwater Management 288 182 129 233 0.10 3,503 Total Municipal Wide Services 7,832 4,949 3,505 6,325 1.15 39,812 Outside of Seaton Lands Transportation 1 6,517 4,117 2,917 5,261 1.83 Total Services Outside of Seaton Lands 6,517 4,117 2,917 5,261 1.83 Seaton 7,832 4,949 3,505 6,325 1.15 39,812 Rest of Pickering 14,349 9,066 6,422 11,586 2.98 1. Subject to a separate agreement outside of the Development Charges Act concerning the provision of Transportation requirements in addition to other funding contributions 2. Does not apply to prestige employment development in Seaton, as that development is subject to the per net Ha land area charge instead. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering12017 DC SfudylReportiPickering DC Background Study -Final. docx Page 51 Table 6-6 Comparison of Current and Calculated D.C.s for Residential Single -Detached Dwelling Units Service Residential per Single & Semi Detached Dwelling Current[ (Indexed) 2 Calculated Cash Flow Municipal Wide Services: Other Services Related to a Highway 441 Operations 614 Protection Services 889 Fire Protection 664 Parks and Recreation Services 5,637 4,851 Library Services 916 1,086 Administration Studies 202 277 Stormwater Management 431 288 Total Municipal Wide Services 8,464 7,832 Outside of Seaton Lands Transportation 1 5,635 6,517 Total Area Specific Services 5,635 6,517 Seaton 8,464 7,832 Rest of Pickering 14,099 14,349 1. Subject to a separate agreement outside of the Development Charges Act concerning the provision of Transportation requirements in addition to other funding contributions 2. 2017 current rates indexed at 3% Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering12017 DC Study\Report4Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 52 Table 6-7 Comparison of Current and Calculated D.C.s For Non -Residential per net ha (Seaton Prestige Employment Lands), and Non - Residential per sq.ft.(Other areas of the City) Service Non -Residential (per net Ha of Prestige Employment Land in Seaton) (per ft' of Total Floor Area) 3 Current (Indexed) 2 Calculated Cash Flow Current (Indexed) 2 Calculated Cash Flow Municipal Wide Services: Other Services Related to a Highway 5,451 0.15 Operations 8,264 0.27 Protection Ser -vices 11,431 0.34 Fire Protection 9,020 0.29 ... Parks and Recreation Senrices 14,514 13,261 0.47 0.39 Library Services 2,360 2,605 0.07 0.08 Administration Studies 2,788 3,560 0.08 0.10 StormwaterManagement 6,057 3,503 0.19 0.10 Total Municipal Wide Services 43,003 39,812 1.37 1.15 Outside of Seaton Lands Transportation 7 2.77 1.83 Total Area Specific Services - - 2.77 1.83 Seaton 43,003 39,812 1.37 1.15 Rest of Pickering 4.14 2.98 1. Subject to a separate agreement outside of the Development Charges Act concerning the provision of Transportation requirements in addition to other funding contributions 2. 2017 current rates indexed at 3% 3. Does not apply to prestige employment development in Seaton, as that development is subject to the per net Ha land area charge instead. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickeringt2017 DC Study\Report\Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 53 7. D.C. Policy Recommendations and D.C. By-law Rules This chapter outlines the D.C. policy recommendations and by-law rules. The rules provided are based on the review of methodology and implementation polices with senior City staff. s.s.5(1)9 states that rules must be developed: "...to determine if a D.C. is payable in any particular case and to determine the amount of the charge, subject to the limitations set out in subsection 6. Paragraph 10 of subsection 5(1) goes on to state that the rules may provide for exemptions, phasing in and/or indexing of D.C.s. s.s.5(6) establishes the following restrictions on the rules: 1. the total of all D.C.s that would be imposed on anticipated development must not exceed the capital costs determined under 5(1) 2-8 for all services involved; 2. if the rules expressly identify a type of development, they must not provide for it to pay D.C.s that exceed the capital costs that arise from the increase in the need for service for that type of development; however, this requirement does not relate to any particular development; 3. if the rules provide for a type of development to have a lower D.C. than is allowed, the rules for determining D.C.s may not provide for any resulting shortfall to be made up via other development; and 4. with respect to "the rules," subsection 6 states that a D.C. by-law must expressly address the matters referred to above re s.s.5(1) para. 9 and 10, as well as how the rules apply to the redevelopment of land. 7.1 D.C. By-law Structure It is recommended that: e the City impose an area -specific D.C. for Transportation Services, with the D.C. applicable on lands outside of Seaton; o the City impose a uniform City-wide D.C. for all other municipal services herein; and ® one municipal D.C. by-law be used for all services. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H: \Pickering12017 DC SfudylReportlPickering DC Background Study-Finat.docx 7.2 D.C. By-law Rules Page 54 The following sets out the recommended rules governing the calculation, payment and collection of D.C.s in accordance with subsection 6 of the D.C.A., 1997. It is recommended that the following provides the basis for the D.C.s: 7.2.1 Payment in any Particular Case In accordance with the D.C.A., 1997, s.2(2), a D.C. be calculated, payable and collected where the development requires one or more of the following: a) the passing of a zoning by-law or of an amendment to a zoning by-law under Section 34 of the Planning Act; b) the approval of a minor variance under Section 45 of the Planning Act; c) a conveyance of land to which a by-law passed under Section 50(7) of the Planning Act applies; d) the approval of a plan of subdivision under Section 51 of the Planning Act; e) a consent under Section 53 of the Planning Act; f) the approval of a description under Section 50 of the Condominium Act; or g) the issuing of a building permit under the Building Code Act in relation to a building or structure. 7.2.2 Determination of the Amount of the Charge The following conventions be adopted: 1) Costs allocated to residential uses will be assigned to different types of residential units based on the average occupancy for each housing type constructed during the previous decade. Costs allocated to non-residential uses will be assigned to development within the Seaton prestige employment lands based on the net hectare of land area, and to non-residential development in all other areas of the City based gross floor area constructed. 2) Costs allocated to residential and non-residential uses are based upon a number of conventions, as may be suited to each municipal service circumstance. These are summarized in Chapter 5 herein. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:IPickering\2017 Dc StudylReport Pickering DC Background Study Final.docx Page 55 72.3 Application to Redevelopment of Land (Demolition and Conversion) If a development involves the demolition and replacement of a building or structure on the same site, or the conversion from one principal use to another, the developer shall be allowed a credit equivalent to: 1) the number of dwelling units demolished/converted multiplied by the applicable residential D.C. in place at the time the D.C. is payable; and/or 2) the total floor area of the building demolished/converted multiplied by the current non-residential D.C. in place at the time the D.C. is payable. The application of the redevelopment credits have been modified from the City's current D.C. by-law, whereby a 10 -year redevelopment period was witnessed. Under the proposed D.C. by-law, the demolition credit is allowed only if the land was improved by occupied structures, and if the demolition permit related to the site was issued within 60 months (5 years) of the issuance of a building permit. The credit can, in no case, exceed the amount of D.C.s that would otherwise be payable. Moreover, no credit will be granted if a D.C. or a lot levy (under By-law 3322/89) has not been paid for the demolished or converted building. The onus is on the applicant to provide proof of prior payment of D.C.s or lot levies. The change in redevelopment credit policy will take effect on July 1, 2017, providing a 6 month phase-in of the practice under the new by-law. 7.2.4 Exemptions (full or partial) a) Statutory exemptions 1. Industrial building additions of up to and including 50% of the existing gross floor area (defined in O.Reg. 82/98, s.1) of the building; for industrial building additions which exceed 50% of the existing gross floor area, only the portion of the addition in excess of 50% is subject to D.C.s (s.4(3)); 2. Buildings or structures owned by and used for the purposes of any City, local board or Board of Education (s.3); and 3. Residential development that results in only the enlargement of an existing dwelling unit, or that results only in the creation of up to two additional dwelling units (based on prescribed limits set out in s.2 of O.Reg. 82/98). Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H.IPickering12017 DC StudylReportlPickering DC Background Study-Finai.docx Page 56 b) Non -statutory exemptions 1. The development of a non-residential farm building used for bona -fide agricultural purposes will be exempt from paying D.C.s for Parks and Recreation Services, Library Services, Administration Services, and Stormwater Management Services. 2, A building or structure that is used in connection with a place of worship an is exempt from taxation under the Assessment Act as a result; 3. Development where no addition dwelling units are being created or non additional nonresidential gross floor area is being added; 4. Nursing homes and hospitals; and 5. Garden Suites. The proposed non -statutory exemption for non-residential farm buildings has been narrowed from its current application within the City's D.C. By -Law. Under the City's current by-Iaw, the exemption for non-residential farm buildings is provided for all services, the proposal seeks to limit the exemption to "soft services", recognizing the service demands for Transportation Services, Other Services Related to a Highway, and Stormwater Management Services. 7.2.5 Phase in Provision(s) No provisions for phasing in the D.C. are provided in the proposed D.C. by-Iaw. 7.2.6 Timing of Collection The D.C.s for all services are payable upon issuance of a building permit for each dwelling unit, building or structure, subject to early or late payment agreements entered into by the City and an owner under s.27 of the D.C.A., 1997. 7.2.7 Indexing All D.C.s will be subject to mandatory indexing annually on July 1St, commencing on July 1, 2019, in accordance with provisions under the D.C.A. It is recommended that authority to index D.C.s as per the provisions of the D.C.A. be delegated to the Treasurer of the City. 7.22 D.C. Spatial Applicability In accordance with the D.C.A., the City gave, consideration to the imposition of D.C.s on an area -specific basis, and is maintaining its current approach of imposing uniform City - Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering42017 DC Study\Repod\t ickering DC Background Study-Finai, docx Page 57 wide D.C.s for all services excluding Transportation Services. Transportation Services will continue to be imposed on an area -specific basis for lands outside of Seaton. 7.3 Other D.C. By-law Provisions Z3.1 Categories of Services for Reserve Fund and Credit Purposes It is recommended that the City's D.C. collections be contributed into seven (7) separate reserve funds, including: Transportation Services, Other Services Related to a Highway, Protection Services, Parks and Recreation Services, Library Services, Administration Services, and Stormwater Management Services. It is further recommended that all D.C. exemptions granted over the life of the by-law be contributed into the applicable D.C. reserve funds from non -D.C. sources. 7.3.2 By --law In -force Date The proposed by-law under D.C.A., 1997 will come into force on the January 1, 2018 7.3.3 Minimum Interest Rate Paid on Refunds and Charged for Inter -Reserve Fund Borrowing The minimum interest rate is the Bank of Canada rate on the day on which the by-law comes into force (as per s.11 of O.Reg. 82198). 7.4 Other Recommendations It is recommended that Council: "Approve the capital project listing set out in Chapter 5 of the "City of Pickering 2017 Development Charges Background Study" dated October 5, 2017, subject to further annual review during the capital budget process;" "Approve the "City of Pickering 2017 Development Charges Background Study" dated October 5, 2017;" "Determine that no further public meeting is required;" and "Approve the Development Charges By -Law as set out in Appendix E". Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:IPickering12017 DC StudylReportlPickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 58 8. Asset Management Plan 8.1 Introduction The recent changes to the D.C.A. (new section 10(c.2)) require that the background study must include an Asset Management Plan (A.M.P) related to new infrastructure. Section 10 (3) of the D.C.A. provides: The A.M.P. shall, (a) deal with all assets whose capital costs are proposed to be funded under the development charge by-law; (b) demonstrate that all the assets mentioned in clause (a) are financially sustainable over their full life cycle; (c) contain any other information that is prescribed; and (d) be prepared in the prescribed manner. At a broad level, the A.M.P. provides for the long-term investment in an asset over its entire useful life along with the funding. The schematic below identifies the costs for an asset through its entire lifecycle. For growth -related works, the majority of capital costs will be funded by the D.C. Non -growth related expenditures will then be funded from non -D.C. revenues as noted below. During the useful life of the asset, there will be minor maintenance costs to extend the life of the asset along with additional program related expenditures to provide the full services to the residents. At the end of the life of the asset, it will be replaced by non -D.C. financing sources. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering42017 DC Study\Report\Pickering DC Background Study -Final. docx Page 59 New Assets Financing Methods Replacement Assets Purchase Install Commission Operaie Maintain Monitor (Throughout Life of Assets ) (To End of Useful Life ) 1 Removal 1 Decommission Dispos al Development Charges (Growth ) Reserves 'Reserve Funds Debentures Taxation User Fees Grants Other Tax Supported Operating Budget User Fees Operating Budget Proceeds on Disposal Funding of Disposal Decommissioning Costs Purchase Install Commission Operate Maintain Monitor {Throughout Life al -Assets ) (To End of Useful Life ) Removal / Decommission - Dispos al In 2012, the Province developed Building Together: Guide for Municipal Asset Management Plans which outlines the key elements for an A.M.P., as follows: State of local infrastructure: asset types, quantities, age, condition, financial accounting valuation and replacement cost valuation. Desired levels of service: defines levels of service through performance measures and discusses any external trends or issues that may affect expected levels of service or the municipality's ability to meet them (for example, new accessibility standards, climate change impacts). Asset management strategy: the asset management strategy is the set of planned actions that will seek to generate the desired levels of service in a sustainable way, while managing risk, at the lowest lifecycle cost. Financing strategy: having a financial plan is critical for putting an A.M.P. into action. By having a strong financial plan, municipalities can also demonstrate that they have made a concerted effort to integrate the A.M.P. with financial planning and municipal budgeting, and are making full use of all available infrastructure financing tools. The above provides for the genera! approach to be considered by Ontario municipalities. At this time, there is not a mandated approach for municipalities hence leaving discretion to individual municipalities as to how they plan for the long-term Watson & Associates Economists Ltd H:1Pickering42017 DC StudylReport(Pickering DC Background Study-Final,docx Page 60 replacement of their assets. The City of Pickering has undertaken an A.M.P dated November 28, 2013. However, the plan addresses only roads and bridges assets and does not include all assets categories that are included in the capital forecast needs of the D.C. background study. For the services included in the A.M.P., the plan addresses growth related needs for the assets included, however the growth -related needs for other D.C. services have not been considered. As a result, the asset management requirement for this D.C. background study must be undertaken in the absence of this information. In recognition to the schematic in Section 8.1, the following table (presented in 2017$) has been developed to provide the annualized expenditures and revenues associated with new growth. Note that the D.C.A. does not require an analysis of the non -D.C. capital needs or their associated operating costs so these are omitted from the table below. Furthermore, as all existing assets for the categories of assets included in the D.C. eligible capital costs are not included in the City's A.M.P. (parks and recreation, library, etc. not included), the present infrastructure gap and associated funding plan has not been considered at this time. Hence the following does not represent a fiscal impact assessment (including future tax/rate increases) but provides insight into the potential affordability of the new assets: 1. The non -D.C. recoverable portion of the projects which will require financing from City financial resources (Le. taxation, rates, fees, etc.). This amount has been presented on an annual debt charge amount based on 20 -year financing. 2. Lifecycle costs for the 2017 D.C. capital works have been presented based on a sinking fund basis. The assets have been considered over their estimated useful lives. 3. Incremental operating costs for the D.C. services (only) have been included. 4. The resultant total annualized expenditures are $55.7 million. 5. Consideration was given to the potential new taxation and user fee revenues which will be generated as a result of new growth. These revenues will be available to finance the expenditures above. The new operating revenues are $49.7 million. This amount, totalled with the existing operating revenues of $94.6 million, provide annual revenues of $144.3 million by the end of the period. 6. In consideration of the above, the capital plan is deemed to be financially sustainable. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:IPickering1201 i DC StudylReport\Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 61 Table 8-1 City of Pickering Asset Management — Future Expenditures and Associated Revenues (2017$ 1 Non -Growth Related component of Projects including 10% mandatory deduction on soft services 2 Interim Debt Financing for Post Period Benefit 3 Area -specific application of Transportation Services 4 As per Sch. 10 of FIR Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering12017 DC Study\ReportlPickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Sub -Total 2031 (Total) Expenditures (Annualized) Annual Debt Payment on Non -Growth Related Capital1 8,549,027 Annual Debt Payment on Post Period Capital2 1,768,466 Lifecycle: Annual Lifecycle - Town Wide Services $8,181,991 Annual Lifecycle - Area Specific Services3 $3,597,036 Sub -Total -Annual Lifecycle $11,779,027 $11,779,027 Incremental Operating Costs (for D.C. Services) $33,637,465 Total Expenditures $55,733,986 Revenue (Annualized) Total Existing Revenue4 $94,578,893 Incremental Tax and Non -Tax Revenue (User Fees, Fines, Licences, etc.) $49,682,047 Total Revenues $144,260,940 1 Non -Growth Related component of Projects including 10% mandatory deduction on soft services 2 Interim Debt Financing for Post Period Benefit 3 Area -specific application of Transportation Services 4 As per Sch. 10 of FIR Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering12017 DC Study\ReportlPickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 62 9. By-law Implementation 9.1 Public Consultation This chapter addresses the mandatory, formal public consultation process (subsection 9.1.1), as well as the optional, informal consultation process (subsection 9.1.2). The latter is designed to seek the co-operation and involvement of those involved, in order to. produce the most suitable policy. Section 9.2 addresses the anticipated impact of the D.C. on development, from a generic viewpoint. 9.1.9 Public Meeting of Council Section 12 of the D.C.A., 1997 indicates that before passing a D.C. by-law, Council must hold at least one public meeting, giving at least 20 clear days' notice thereof, in accordance with the Regulation. Council must also ensure that the proposed by-law and background report are made available to the public at least two weeks prior to the (first) meeting. Any person who attends such a meeting may make representations related to the proposed by-law. If a proposed by-law is changed following such a meeting, the Council must determine whether a further meeting (under this section) is necessary. For example, if the by-law which is proposed for adoption has been changed in any respect, the Council should formally consider whether an additional public meeting is required, incorporating this determination as part of the final by-law or associated resolution. It is noted that Council's decision, once made, is final and not subject to review by a Court or the O.M.B. 9,1.2 Other Consultation Activity There are three broad groupings of the public who are generally the most concerned with municipal D.C. policy: 1. The residential development community, consisting of land developers and builders, who are typically responsible for generating the majority of the D.C. revenues. Others, such as realtors, are directly impacted by D.C. policy. They are, therefore, potentially interested in all aspects of the charge, particularly the quantum by unit type, projects to be funded by the D.C. and the timing thereof, Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering12017 DC StudylReport4Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 63 and municipal policy with respect to development agreements, D.C. credits and front -ending requirements. 2. The second public grouping embraces the public at large and includes taxpayer coalition groups and others interested in public policy (e.g. in encouraging a higher non -automobile modal split). 3. The third grouping is the industrial/commercial/institutional development sector, consisting of land developers and major owners or organizations with significant construction plans, such as hotels, entertainment complexes, shopping centres, offices, industrial buildings and institutions. Also involved are organizations such as Industry Associations, the Chamber of Commerce, the Board of Trade and the Economic Development Agencies, who are all potentially interested in municipal D.C. policy. Their primary concern is frequently with the quantum of the charge, gross floor area exclusions such as basement, mechanical or indoor parking areas, or exemptions and phase-in or capping provisions in order to moderate the impact. 9.2 Anticipated Impact of the Charge on Development The establishment of sound D.C. policy often requires the achievement of an acceptable balance between two competing realities. The first is that high non- residential D.C.s can, to some degree, represent a barrier to increased economic activity and sustained industrial/commercial growth, particularly for capital intensive uses. Also, in many cases, increased residential D.C.s can ultimately be expected to be recovered via higher housing prices and can impact project feasibility in some cases (e.g. rental apartments). On the other hand, D.C.s or other municipal capital funding sources need to be obtained in order to help ensure that the necessary infrastructure and amenities are installed. The timely installation of such works is a key initiative in providing adequate service levels and in facilitating strong economic growth, investment and wealth generation. 9.3 Implementation Requirements Once the City has calculated the charge, prepared the complete Background Study, carried out the public process and passed a new by-law, the emphasis shifts to implementation matters. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickering12017 DC StudyiReport4Pickering DC Background Study -Final docx Page 64 These include notices, potential appeals and complaints, credits, front -ending agreements, subdivision agreement conditions and finally the collection of revenues and funding of projects. The following provides an overview of the requirements in each case. 9.31 Notice of Passage In accordance with s.13 of the D.C.A., when a D.C. by-law is passed, the municipal clerk shall give written notice of the passing and of the last day for appealing the by-law (the day that is 40 days after the day it was passed). Such notice must be given not later than 20 days after the day the by-law is passed (i.e. as of the day of newspaper publication or the mailing of the notice). Section 10 of O.Reg. 82198 further defines the notice requirements which are summarized as follows: 6. Notice may be given by publication in a newspaper which is (in the Clerk's opinion) of sufficient circulation to give the public reasonable notice, or by personal service, fax or mail to every owner of land in the area to which the by- law relates; 7. s.s.10 (4) lists the persons/organizations who must be given notice; and 8. s.s.10 (5) lists the eight items which the notice must cover. 9.32 By-law Pamphlet In addition to the "notice" information, the City must prepare a "pamphlet" explaining each D.C. by-law in force, setting out: 9. a description of the general purpose of the D.C.s; 10. the "rules" for determining if a charge is payable in a particular case and for determining the amount of the charge; 11. the services to which the D.C.s relate; and 12,a general description of the general purpose of the Treasurer's statement and where it may be received by the public. Where a by-law is not appealed to the O.M.B., the pamphlet must be readied within 60 days after the by-law comes into force. Later dates apply to appealed by-laws. The City must give one copy of the most recent pamphlet without charge, to any person who requests one. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:IPickering42017 DC Study\Report\Pickering DC Background Study -Final. docx Page 65 9.3.3 Appeals Sections 13 to 19 of the D.C.A., 1997 set out requirements relative to making and processing a D.C. by-law appeal and an O.M.B. Hearing in response to an appeal. Any person or organization may appeal a D.C. by-law to the O.M.B. by filing a notice of appeal with the municipal clerk, setting out the objection to the by-law and the reasons supporting the objection. This must be done by the last day for appealing the by-law, which is 40 days after the by-law is passed. 9.3.4 Complaints A person required to pay a D.C., or his agent, may complain to Municipal Council imposing the charge that: 13. the amount of the charge was incorrectly determined; 14. the credit to be used against the D.C. was incorrectly determined; or 15. there was an error in the application of the D.C. Sections 20 to 25 of the D.C.A., 1997 set out the requirements that exist, including the fact that a complaint may not be made later than 90 days after a D.C. (or any part of it) is payable. A complainant may appeal the decision of Municipal Council to the O.M.B. 9.3.5 Credits Sections 38 to 41 of the D.C.A., 1997 set out a number of credit requirements, which apply where a City agrees to allow a person to perform work in the future that relates to a service in the D.C. by-law. These credits would be used to reduce the amount of D.C.s to be paid. The value of the credit is limited to the reasonable cost of the work which does not exceed the average level of service. The credit applies only to the service to which the work relates, unless the City agrees to expand the credit to other services for which a D.C. is payable. 9.3.6 Front -Ending Agreements The City and one or more landowners may enter into a front -ending agreement which provides for the costs of a project which will benefit an area in the City to which the D.C. by-law applies. Such an agreement can provide for the costs to be borne by one or more parties to the agreement who are, in turn, reimbursed in future by persons who develop land defined in the agreement. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering\2017 DC StudylReport\Pickering DC Background Study-Finai. docx Page 66 Part III of the D.C.A., 1997 (Sections 44 to 58) addresses front -ending agreements and removes some of the obstacles to their use which were contained in the D.C.A., 1989. Accordingly, the City assesses whether this mechanism is appropriate for its use, as part of funding projects prior to municipal funds being available. 9.3.7 Severance and Subdivision Agreement Conditions Section 59 of the D.C.A., 1997 prevents a City from imposing directly or indirectly, a charge related to development or a requirement to construct a service related to development, by way of a condition or agreement under s.51 or s.53 of the Planning Act, except for: ▪ "local services, related to a plan of subdivision or within the area to which the plan relates, to be installed or paid for by the owner as a condition of approval under Section 51 of the Planning Act;" • "local services to be installed or paid for by the owner as a condition of approval under Section 53 of the Planning Act." It is also noted that s.s.59(4) of the D.C.A., 1997 requires that the municipal approval authority for a draft plan of subdivision under s.s.51(31) of the Planning Act, use its power to impose conditions to ensure that the first purchaser of newly subdivided land is informed of all the D.C.s related to the development, at the time the land is transferred. In this regard, if the City in question is a commenting agency, in order to comply with subsection 59(4) of the D.C.A., 1997 it would need to provide to the approval authority, information regarding the applicable municipal D.C.s related to the site. If the City is an approval authority for the purposes of Section 51 of the Planning Act, it would be responsible to ensure that it collects information from all entities which can impose a D.C. The most effective way to ensure that purchasers are aware of this condition would be to require it as a provision in a registered subdivision agreement, so that any purchaser of the property would be aware of the charges at the time the title was searched prior to closing a transaction conveying the lands. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H: IPickering12017 DC Study\Report\Pickering DC Background Study -Final. docx Page 67 Appendix A - Background Information on Residential and Non-residential Growth Forecast Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H: IPickering12017 DG StudylReporf\Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Schedule 1 City of Pickering Residential Growth Forecast Summary Page 68 Year Population (Including Census Population (Excluding Census Undercount) Institutional Population p Population Excluding Institutional Population Housing Units Singles & Serail Detached Multiple Dwellings' S 9 ` Apadmenls o Other Total Households Person Per Una (PPU) I ) 8 Mid 2006 91980 87,838 569 67,243 20,335 4,770 3,110 10 28225 3.11 0 Mi02911 92,800 88,721 555 88,125 20,740 5,380 3,190 15 29,325 3,03 Md 2016 05.990 91,771 776 90,995 21,125 6,086 3,895 39 30,915 2.97 Early2018 97,465 93,176 788 92,388 21,414 6,445 3,733 30 31617 295 m ally 2093 137,400 131.445 1,111 130,334 26,154 12,742 6,358 30 47,294 2.78 o u Early 9026 175,910 168,172 1,422 166,750 29,593 16,439 13,129 30 61,189 2.95 0642031 189208 180,805 1.530 179,368 30,192 20,228 15.080 30 65,550 278 Incremental Mid 2006 -Mid 2011 920 883 0 683 405 610 80 5 1,100 Mid 2011 -Mid 2018 3,190 3,050 181 2,869 386 085 805 15 1,590 Mid 2016 • Early 2015 1,470 1,405 12 1,393 289 376 38 0 702 Early 2016 - Early 2023 40,036 36,269 323 39,940 4,740 6,302 4,035 0 16,677 Early 2018 -E9117 2028 78,450 74,996 034 74,382 6,179 11,999 9,393 0 29,572 Earty 2018 - Mid 2031 91,746 87,709 742 99,968 8,778 13,788 11,347 0 33,913 Source. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2018. Derived from Durham Region Official P156. Note- Population forecast excludes Northeast Pickering. Note: A total of approximately 35,500 persons (including the net Census undercount) end 11,700 households have been reserved for Northeast Pickering between 2027 and 2031 as the populatiodend households allocated to Ihlr area have been deferred. 1_ Census Undercount estimated at approximately 4.646. Ndle: Papulation Ihcluding 100 Undercount has b@es rounded, 2. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 3. includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. Housing Units 3,500 3.000 2,500 2.000 1,500 1,000 500 Figure A-1 Annual Housing Forecast' en 272 rr 1131 '10 599 ms 952 707 1,Osc 3254 3.0,1 5.957 1,117 3,112 1,112 3012 1112 Soo Years tory' 1017 10 VT" s ,0 'I -o"° =Historical =Low Density =Medium Density =High Density -Historical Average Source: Historical housing activity (2007.2018) based on Statistics Canada bulding permits. 1. Growth Forecast represents calendar year. Wesson 5Associate. Economists lid, 9227201 Hip5k.ri55l2a1755515050500±57 Flawing 2x17 oc Growth Ssotso her 22 2017a:15m Page 69 Schedule 2 City of Pickering Estimate of the Anticipated Amount, Type And Location of Residential Development for which Development Charges can be Imposed Development Location Timing Singles & Semi -2 Detached Ntultiples Apartments Total Residential Units Gross Population In New Units Existing Unit Population Change Net Population Increase Seaton 2018 - 2028 4,632 7,089 5,550 17,471 48,536 - 48,450 2018 - 2031 5,298 8,599 7,295 21,193 58,030 - 58,030 Rest of Pickering 2018-2028 3,347 4,910 3,844 12,101 33,617 (7,791) 25,826 2018 - 2031 3,480 5,188 4,052 12,720 35,302 (6,366) 28,936 City of Pickering 2018 - 2028 8,179 11,999 9,393 29,572 62,153 (7,791) 74,362 2018 - 2031 8,778 13,788 11,347 33,913 93,333 (6,366) 86,966 Source: Watson 8, Associates Economists Ltd., 2016. Derived from Durham Region Official Plan. Note: Population forecast excludes Northeast Pickering, Note: A total of approximately 36500 persons (including the net Census undercount) and 11,700 households have been reserved for Northeast Pickering between 2027 and 2031 as the population and households allocated to this area have been deferred. 1. Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. 2. includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. H:1Pickering12017 DC Study hGrowth\ Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. - 9114/2017 Pickering 2017 DC Growth September 14 2017.xlsm Page 70 Schedule 3 City of Pickering Current Year Growth Forecast EARLY 2016 to EARLY 2018 (1) 2016 population based on StatCan Census unadjusted for Census Undercount. (2) Estimated residential units constructed, Mid 2016 to the beginning of the growth period, assuming a six-month lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be. (4) (5) (6) (7) Persons % Distribution Weighted Persons Structural Type Per Unit' of Estimated Units' Per Unit Average Singles & Semi -Detached 3.65 41% 1,50 Multiples (6) 3.29 53% 1.76 Apartments (7) 2.59 5% 0.14 Total 100% 3.40 Based on 2011 Census custom database ' Based on building pemiiticompletion activity 2016 households taken from StatCan Census. Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family lifecycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. H:1Pickering12017 DC Study\Growthl Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 9/22/2017 Pickering 2017 DC Growth September 22 2017.xlsm Population (Net of Institutional) Mid 2016 Population 90,995 Occupants of New Housing Units, Mid 2016 to EARLY 2018 Units (2) 702 multiplied by persons per unit (3) 3.40 gross population increase 2,385 2,385 Decline in Housing Unit Occupancy, Mid 2016 to EARLY 2018 Units (4) 30,915 multiplied by ppu decline rate (5) -0.0321 total decline in population -992 -992 Population Estimate to EARLY 2018 92,388 Net Population Increase Mid 2016 to Early 2017 1,393 (1) 2016 population based on StatCan Census unadjusted for Census Undercount. (2) Estimated residential units constructed, Mid 2016 to the beginning of the growth period, assuming a six-month lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be. (4) (5) (6) (7) Persons % Distribution Weighted Persons Structural Type Per Unit' of Estimated Units' Per Unit Average Singles & Semi -Detached 3.65 41% 1,50 Multiples (6) 3.29 53% 1.76 Apartments (7) 2.59 5% 0.14 Total 100% 3.40 Based on 2011 Census custom database ' Based on building pemiiticompletion activity 2016 households taken from StatCan Census. Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family lifecycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. H:1Pickering12017 DC Study\Growthl Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 9/22/2017 Pickering 2017 DC Growth September 22 2017.xlsm Page 71 Schedule 4 City of Pickering Five Year Growth Forecast EARLY 2018 to EARLY 2023 (1) EARLY 2018 Population based on: 2016 Population (90,995) + Mid 2016 to EARLY 2018 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (702 x 3.4 = 2,385) + (30,915 x -0.0321 = -992) = 92,388 (2) Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be: Persons /s Distribution Weighted Persons Structural Type Per Unit' of Estimated Units Per Unit Average Singles & Semi -Detached 3.53 30% 1.07 Multiples (6) 2.85 40% 1.15 Apartments (7) 2.03 30% 0.60 one bedroom or less 1.58 two bedrooms or more 2.23 Total 100°/0 2.81 Persons per unit based on adjusted Statistics Canada Custom 2011 Census database. Forecast untt mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process. (4) EARLY 2018 households based upon 30,915 (2011 Census) + 702 (Mid 2016 to EARLY 2018 unit estimate) = 31,617 (5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family lifecycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6) Includes townhouses and apartments In duplexes. (7) Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. H'IPickering12017 DC Study\Growth\ Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 9/22/2017 Pickering 2017 DC Growth September 22 2017.xlsm Population (Net of Institutional) EARLY 2018 Population 92,388 Occupants of New Housing Units, EARLY 2018 to EARLY 20: Units (2) 15,677 multiplied by persons per unit (3) 2.81 gross population increase 44,109 44,109 Decline in Housing Unit Occupancy, EARLY 2018 to EARLY 20 Units (4) 31,617 multiplied by ppu decline rate (5) -0.1949 total decline in population -6,163 -6,163 Population Estimate to EARLY 2023 130,334 Net Population Increase, EARLY 2018 to EARLY 2023 37,946 (1) EARLY 2018 Population based on: 2016 Population (90,995) + Mid 2016 to EARLY 2018 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (702 x 3.4 = 2,385) + (30,915 x -0.0321 = -992) = 92,388 (2) Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be: Persons /s Distribution Weighted Persons Structural Type Per Unit' of Estimated Units Per Unit Average Singles & Semi -Detached 3.53 30% 1.07 Multiples (6) 2.85 40% 1.15 Apartments (7) 2.03 30% 0.60 one bedroom or less 1.58 two bedrooms or more 2.23 Total 100°/0 2.81 Persons per unit based on adjusted Statistics Canada Custom 2011 Census database. Forecast untt mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process. (4) EARLY 2018 households based upon 30,915 (2011 Census) + 702 (Mid 2016 to EARLY 2018 unit estimate) = 31,617 (5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family lifecycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6) Includes townhouses and apartments In duplexes. (7) Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. H'IPickering12017 DC Study\Growth\ Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 9/22/2017 Pickering 2017 DC Growth September 22 2017.xlsm Page 72 Schedule 5a City of Pickering Ten Year Growth Forecast EARLY 2018 to EARLY 2028 (1) EARLY 2018 Population based on: 2016 Population (90,995) + Mid 2016 to EARLY 2018 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (702 x 3.4 _ 2,385) + (30,915 x -0.0321 = -992) - 92,388 (2) Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be: Structural Type Singles & Semi -Detached Multiples (6) Apartments (7) Persons Per Unit' one bedroom or less 1.58 two bedrooms or more 2.23 Total 100% 2.78 Persons per unit based on adjusted Statistics Canada Custom 2011 Census database. Forecast unit mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process. (4) EARLY 2018 households based upon 30,915 (2011 Census) + 702 (Mid 2016 to EARLY 2018 unit estimate) = 31,617 (5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family lifecycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6) Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. (7) Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. 3.53 2.85 2.03 % Distribution of Estimated Units' 28% 41% 32% Weighted Persons Per Unit Average 0.98 1.16 0.64 H:1Pickering12017 DC Study\Growth) Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 9/22/2017 Pickering 2017 DC Growth September 22 2017.xlsm Population (Net of Institutional) EARLY 2018 Population 92,388 Occupants of New Housing Units, EARLY 2018 to EARLY 20: Units (2) 29,572 multiplied by persons perunit(3) 2.78 gross population increase 82,153 82,153 Decline in Housing Unit Occupancy, EARLY 2018 to EARLY 20' Units (4) 31,617 multiplied by ppu decline rate (5) -0.2464 total decline in population -7,791 -7,791 Population Estimate to EARLY 2028 166,750 Net Population Increase, EARLY 2018 to EARLY 2028 74,362 (1) EARLY 2018 Population based on: 2016 Population (90,995) + Mid 2016 to EARLY 2018 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (702 x 3.4 _ 2,385) + (30,915 x -0.0321 = -992) - 92,388 (2) Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be: Structural Type Singles & Semi -Detached Multiples (6) Apartments (7) Persons Per Unit' one bedroom or less 1.58 two bedrooms or more 2.23 Total 100% 2.78 Persons per unit based on adjusted Statistics Canada Custom 2011 Census database. Forecast unit mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process. (4) EARLY 2018 households based upon 30,915 (2011 Census) + 702 (Mid 2016 to EARLY 2018 unit estimate) = 31,617 (5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family lifecycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6) Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. (7) Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. 3.53 2.85 2.03 % Distribution of Estimated Units' 28% 41% 32% Weighted Persons Per Unit Average 0.98 1.16 0.64 H:1Pickering12017 DC Study\Growth) Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 9/22/2017 Pickering 2017 DC Growth September 22 2017.xlsm Page 73 Schedule 5b City of Pickering Buildout Growth Forecast EARLY 2018 to Mid 2031 (1) EARLY 2018 Population based an' 2016 Population (90,995) + Mid 2016 to EARLY 2018 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (702 x 3.4 = 21385) + (30,915 x -0.0321 = -992) = 92,388 (2) Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be: Persons % Distribution Weighted Persons Structural Type Per Unit' of Estimated Units' Per Unit Average Singles & Semi -Detached 3.53 26% 0.91 Multiples (6) 2.85 41% 1.16 Apartments (7) 2.03 33% 0.68 one bedroom or less 1.58 two bedrooms or more 2.23 Total 100% 2.75 Persons per unit based on adjusted Statistics Canada Custom 2011 Census database. Forecast unit mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process. (4) EARLY 2018 households based upon 30,915 (2011 Census) + 702 (Mid 2016 to EARLY 2018 unit estimate) = 31,617 (5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family lifecycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6) Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. (7) Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. H:1Pickering12017 DC StudylGrcwthl Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 9/22/2017 Pickering 2017 DC Growth September 22 2017.xlsm Population (Net of Institutional) EARLY 2018 Population 92,388 Occupants of New Housing Units, EARLY 2018 to 2031 Units (2) 33,913 multiplied by persons per unit (3) 2.75 gross population increase 93,333 93,333 Decline in Housing Unit Occupancy, EARLY 2018 to 2031 Units (4) 31,617 multiplied by ppu. decline rate (5) -0.2013 total decline in population -6,366 -6,366 Population Estimate to 2031 179,356 Net Population increase, EARLY 2018 to 2031 86,968 (1) EARLY 2018 Population based an' 2016 Population (90,995) + Mid 2016 to EARLY 2018 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (702 x 3.4 = 21385) + (30,915 x -0.0321 = -992) = 92,388 (2) Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be: Persons % Distribution Weighted Persons Structural Type Per Unit' of Estimated Units' Per Unit Average Singles & Semi -Detached 3.53 26% 0.91 Multiples (6) 2.85 41% 1.16 Apartments (7) 2.03 33% 0.68 one bedroom or less 1.58 two bedrooms or more 2.23 Total 100% 2.75 Persons per unit based on adjusted Statistics Canada Custom 2011 Census database. Forecast unit mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process. (4) EARLY 2018 households based upon 30,915 (2011 Census) + 702 (Mid 2016 to EARLY 2018 unit estimate) = 31,617 (5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family lifecycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6) Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. (7) Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. H:1Pickering12017 DC StudylGrcwthl Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 9/22/2017 Pickering 2017 DC Growth September 22 2017.xlsm Page 74 Schedule 6 City of Pickering Historical Residential Building Permits Years 2007 - 2016 Year Residential Building Permits Singles & Semi- Detached Multiples1 Apartments2 Total 2007 108 77 3 188 2008 67 177 4 248 2009 55 6 16 77 2010 84 42 146 272' 2011 259 75 241 575 Sub -total 314 377 410 1,360 Average (2007 - 2011) 79 75 82 272 % Breakdown 23.1% 27.7% 30.1% 81.0% 2012 237 46 0 283 2013 148 274 3 425 2014 166 98 0 264 2015 148 24 190 362 2016 212 115 25 352 Sub -total 699 557 218 1,686 Average (2012 - 2016) 175 111 44 337 % Breakdown 41.5% 33.0% 12.9% 87.4% 2007 - 2016 Total 1,013 934 628 3,046 Average 127 93 63 305 % Breakdown 33.3% 30.7% 20.6% 84.5% Source: Historical housing activity (2007-2016) based on Statistics Canada building permits. 1. Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. 2. includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. H:IPickering12017 DC StudylGrowthl Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 0/1412017 Pickering 2017 DC Growth September 14 2017.x[sm Page 75 Schedule 7 City of Pickering Persons Per Unit By Age and Type Of Dwelling (2011 Census) Age of Dwelling Singles and Semi -Detached < 1 BR < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total 20 Year Average 1-5 - - - 3.620 4.000 3.621 1.471 6-10 - - - 3.615 4.467 3.688 1.867 11-15 - - - 3.361 4.250 3.395 3.071 16-20 - - - 3.263 4.787 3.408 3 53 20-25 - - 3.214 3.363 3.969 3.447 3.103 25-35 - - 2.588 3.285 3.726 3.279 Total 35+ 0.381 2.111 2.125 2.853 3.430 2.804 Total 0.315 3.333 2.509 3.181 3.940 3.200 Age of Dwelling Multiples' < 1 BR < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 314 BR 5+ BR Total 20 Year Average 1-5 - - - 2.895 - 3.286 1.471 6-10 0.417- 1.429 2.286 3.153 - 2.797 1.867 11-15 0.182- 1.417 - 3.040 - 2.992 3.071 16-20 - - 2.313 2.318 2.667 2.336 2,R5 20-25 0.615- 1.444 2.579 3.500 4.947 3.303 3.103 25-35 - - 2.091 2.855 - 2.812 Total 35+ 0.800 1.833 2.818 2.961 3.421 2.814 Total 0.710 2.400 2.556 2.957 4:333 2.844 Age of Dwelling Apartments3 < 1 BR < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total 20 Year Average 1-5 - - - - - 2.588 1.471 6-10 - 1.429 1.875 - - 2.045 1.867 11-15 - 1.417 1.488 3.188 - 1.719 3.071 16-20 - 1.250 1.653 2.524 - 1.767 2.03 20-25 - 1.444 1.515 2.714 - 1.681 3.103 25-35 - 1.182 1.941 2.250 - 1.895 Total 35+ 0.583 1.526 2.147 2.730 - 2.306 Total 0.489 1.398 1.697 2.793 - 1.963 Age of Dwelling All Density Types < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total 1-5 -- 1.833 3.456 3.938 3.241 6-10 - 1.471 2.186 3.409 4.086 3.201 11-15 - 1.511 1.867 3.268 3.885 3.069 16-20 - 1.238 1.896 3.071 4.246 2.971 20-25 - 1.559 1.940 3.353 4.000 3.255 25-35 - 1.308 2.082 3.169 3.797 3.103 35+ - 1.532 1.983 2.843 3.316 2.753 Total 1.895 1.473 1.976 3.100 3.800 2.997 1. The Census PPU has been adjusted to account for he downward PPU trend which has bean recently experienced in both new and older units, largely due to the aging of the population. 2. Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. 3. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. Note Does not include Statistics Canada data classified as "Other". PPU not calculated for samples less than or equal to 50 dwelling units, and does not include institutional population. H:1Pickering12017 DC Study\GrowtM Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 0/1412017 Pickering 2017 DC Growth September 14 2017.xlsm Persons Per Dwelling 4.00 3.50 - 3.00 - 2.50 - 2.00 - 1.50 - 1.00 - 0.50 - 0.00 Page 76 Schedule 8 City of Pickering Persons Per Unit By Structural Type and Age Of Dwelling (2011 Census) 3.62 .29 3.69 3.39 3.41 3.45 3.30 3.28 - a 2.99 2.59 2 34_ 1 2.31 2.05 1 �� 1- 77 .68 1.89 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 Age of Dwelling 20-25 25-35 oSingles and Semi -Detached ®Multiples DApartments 35+ Page 77 Schedule Oa City of Pickering Employment Growth Forecaet Summary Perled Population Ac10,104 Rate Employment Primary Work at Home Indus'nsl Comm4rcla3lI Popajallon Related Insl'tutlonal Tota NPPOW' Total including NFPOW Primary Work At Home Industrial Po Commercial! Population Reiaterl Po Igsutut€onal Total NFPOW' Tota! Employment Ouch/ding NFPCWI .: '�Mid'2006 87,936 0001 0,034'. [.145-.. 0.137 1-:0,025 ''- 0,365 :': 6,028 '.-0304 .:'80 -:3020 x::12740 ':: 11990 4258 : 32085 -.'. 2530 i' 34.610:. --- Mid 2011 88,721 ':6.001 -0.1135 0,148': .0147 --.0,200 :- 0,379 -:'.0.029 1:'0.206 -: 60 '.3085 .-'13770 - 13570 4320'.'-' 93669. 2576''.' 36,236:',:: �: Early 2018 93976 0001 0.036 0.120 0,168 0082 0386 8,831 0416 84 3,351 11,752 14,941 5.796 35.925 2943 38,767 Early 2023 131 445 0,001 0.024 0.149 0,136 0952 6.366 0,022 0.388 54 3949 19,529 17,526 6,815 48,121 2,885 51,209 Early 2028 160,172 Opel 0026 0.153 5.122 0944 0.345 0,010 6,363 84 4,415 25.775 20,517 7,318 55,110 2,550 51,060 61d 2031 164855 0.000 2020 0187 0.123 0,042 0.275 0.017 0.391 85 4,747 33,915 22,279 7,620 08,845 3,074 71.719 incremental Change -75 :. lid 2000 - r4id 2011 :.". :'.833 ::0:0060 10.0003 0.6074: 0:0101 _.;:-;0:0003 : 06142... .::6.0902 .,,O.tl143 .._. 0 -. - 60 : ' 430 -: 1021, YO Mid 2011 - Early 2018 4955 0.0000 0,0013 -6.0223 00137 0.0135 0.0062 0.0015 00077 4 271 1,418 1,951 9476 2,205 273 2537 Early 2010 -Early 2023 38,209 -00003 -0,0269 0.0224 '5.0247 -0.0104 -0,0194 -0.0086 -0.0280 0 518 7,777 2,685 1,019 12,109 42 12.241 Early 2018- Early 2028 74,996 -5.0004 0,0037 0,0271 -0.8334 -0.0187 -0.0400 -0.0130 -00530 0 1,064 14,024 5,576 1,522 22,185 107 22,293 Early 2018- Mid 2031 87,709 -0,0004 -60097 0,0614 .0.0372 -0.5251 -59061 5,0135 -09196 0 1,395 22963 7,320 1,825 32,721 231 32,952 Annual Average M1112001 -Mid 2006 :'--. :140: "-510028 :' 0.00554 -0:00175'. X0:00079 :160107 '' 000034 -'-0,00117 :--0,60078 :.-..-24 :' 52 -'.-132 - Eli 100 :: 84 -96 -94 Mid 2006 -11104 2011 - 177': 40700 OODO'f- 6.00177-'. '0.0920 ::05001 1:.0.0028 moon 10.0029 5 - 12 Mid 2011 -Early 2018 685 0,0000 0.0002 -0.0034 0,0021 2.2021 0,0009 ' 0,0902 0.0012 1 42 -218 297 227 348 42 390 Early 2018 - Early 2023 7,654 -0.00025 -3.90131 0,00449 -0.05495 -0.00227 -090389 -090171 -000560 0 104 1._555 577 204 2,440 0 2,448 Early 2018 -Early 2028 7,500 -5,00004 -0.00097 000271 -0.00304 -0.00157 -9,60400 -0,00130 -0,00530 0 106 1,402 555 152 2,219 11 2.229 Early 2016 - Mid 2031 6,265 '5.00903 -0.00064 000436 -0.50240 -0,09143 -0.00043 -5,70097 -008148 0 100 1,583 524 130 2,337 17 2,354 5nornat Watson 8 Associates Economists Ltd., 2018. laenved Prem Durham Region 745c111 Plan. Hetet Population forecast excludes Northeast Pickering_ Note: Atotal Of 5,500 job: 14,900 usual place Of Work job have beenreserved fur Northeast Pickering between 2027 and 2031, 1, statistics Canaria defines no fixed place of work 10170001) employe. as "persons who do not go from hereto the same work place laced': at the beginning o0 each shift'. such persons ]nc€ude building and landscape contactor, travelling salespersons, independent truck drivers, etc. Watson & gssacl02, Econvmiste 112. 101312017 Employment Total (Exclgding NFPOW and Work at Home) 20 060 38,555 32,573 44,254 53,694 03,099 1,993 11,581 21,121 31,320 32 304. 307 2,336 2,112 895 H:9PE[<ef pg12517 OC 6tvdy96rognht Pickering 201709. GrewRh Septa -Hist 32 2517 yfsm Page 78 Schedule 9b City of Pickering Employment & Gross Floor Area (GFA) Forecast, 2071 to 2031 Period Population Employment Gross Floor Area in Square Feet (Estimated)' Primary Industrial Commercial! Population Related Institutional Total Industrial Commercialf Population Related institutional Total Mid 2001 87,139 . 200 't 13,400 rs;... 11550: 3,750 28:900 Mid 2006 87,838; BO 12,740 990 4,250 29;060 Mid 2011 88,721 80': 13170 13,010 4;320 30,580 Early 2018 93,176 84 11,752 14,941 5,795 32,573 Early 2023 131,445 84 19,529 17,826 6,815 44,254 Early 2028 168,172 84 25,776 20,517 7,318 53,694 Mid 2031 180,885 85 33,915 22,279 7,820 63,899 Incremental Change Mid. 2001 Mid 2006 699 -120 -860 440::':` 500 •:160 Mid 2006 -:Mid 2011 883 430 ,020 Mid 2011 - Mid 2017 4,455 4 -1,418 1,931 1,476 1,993 Early 2018 - Early 2028 74,996 0 14,024 5,576 1,522 21,121 16,828,246 2,230,320 1,027,387 20, 085,954 Early 2018 - Mid 2031 87,709 0 22;163 7,338 1,825 31,326 26,595,015 2,935,229 1,231,717 30,761,962 Annual Average Mid 2001 - Mid 2E106 140 -24 -132 is 86 100 32 Mid 2006 Mid 2011 177 204 304 Mid 2011 - Early 2018 685 1 -218 297 227 307 Early 2018 - Early 2028 7,500 0 1,402 558 152 2,112 1,682,825 223,032 102,739 2,008,595 Early 2018 - Mid 2031 2,506 0 633 210 52 895 759,858 83,864 35,192 876,913 Source: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2018 Derived from Durham Region Official Plan. Note: Population forecast excludes Northeast Pickering. Note: A total of 5,000 jobs (4,900 usual place of work obs) have been reserved for Northeast Pickering between 2027 and 2031 as the jobs allocated to this area have been deferred. 1. Square Foot Per Employee Assumptions Industrial 1,203 Commercial/Population Related 400 Institutional 675 H:1Pickering\2017 00 StudylGrowthl Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 10/3/2017 Pickering 2017 DC Growth September 22 2017.xIsm Page 79 Schedule 9c Estimate of the Anticipated Amount, Type and Location of Non -Residential Development for Which Development Charges can be Imposed Development Location Timing Industrial GFA S.F. Commercial GFA S.F. Institutional GFA S.F. Total Non -Res GFA S.F. Employment Increase' Seaton 2018 - 2028 14,285,063 2,028,000 976,933 17,289,996 18,793 2018-2031 23,829,000 2,679,300 1,162,800 27,671,100 28,860 Remaining Pickering 2018-2028 2,543,184 202,320 50,454 2,795,958 2,328 2018-2031 2,766,015 255,929 68,917 3,090,862 2,466 City of°Pickering 2018-2028 16,828,246 2,230,320 1,027;387 20,085,954 21,121 2018-2031 26,595,015 2,935,229 1,231,717 30,761,962 31,326 Source: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2018 Note: A total of 5,000 jobs (4,900 usual place of work jobs) have been reserved for Northeast Pickering between 2027 and 2031 as the jobs allocated to this area have been deferred. 1. Employment Increase does not include No Fixed Place of Work. 2. Square feet per employee assumptions (2017-2031): Industrial 1,200 Commercial 400 Institutional 675 H:1Pickering12017 DC Study\Growth\ Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 10/3/2017 Pickering 2017 DC Growth September 22 2017.xlsm Page 80 Appendix B - Level of Service Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H.:\Pickeringl2017 DC Study4ReportlPickering DC Background Study-Final.docx City of Pickering Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: • Fire Facilities ft2 of building area Page 81 Description 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Bld'g Value ($Kt2) Value/ft2 with land, site works, etc. Station # 5 - 1616 Bayly Street 13,360 13,360 13,360 13,360 13,360 13,360 13,360 13,360 13,360 13,360 $309 $405 Station # 2 - 553 Kingston Road 7,955 7,955 7,955 7,955 7,955 7,955 7,955 7,955 7,955 7,955 $271 $441 Station #4 - 4941 Old Brock (Claremount) 5,274 5,274 5,274 5,274 5,274 5,274 5,274 5,274 5,274 5,274 $379 $470 Station #6 - 1115 Finch Ave. _ 9,130 9,130 9,130 9,130 9,130 9,130 9,130 9,130 9,130 9,130 $302 $388 1. 1111111111 II M MI ME Total 1 35,719 1 35,719 l 35.719 1 35,719 35,71.9 1 35,719 { 35,719 1 35,719 { 35,719 35,719 Population 88,173 88,552 88,355 Per Capita Standard 0.41 0.40 0.40 88,721i 89,885 0.40 0.40 90,250 91,042 91,316 91,771 92,334 0.40 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 10 Year Average 1 2008-2017 Quantity Standard 0.40 Quality Standard $418 Service Standard $166 DC Amount (before deductions) 1 10 Year Forecast Population 74,362 $ per Capita $166 Eligible Amount $12,344,092 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Pickering 2017 DC v26 City of Pickering Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Fire Small Equipment and Gear No. of equipment and gear Page 82 Description 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Value ($/item) Self Contained Breathing Apparatus 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 $9,467 SCBA Cylinders 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 $2,150 SCBA Mask 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 _88 $544 Turnout Bunker Kit(lncludes hood, gloves) 176 108 176 108 176 108 176 108 176 108 176 108 176 108 176 108 176 108 176 108 $2,092 $543 Fire Helmet Station Wear Ensemble 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 $580 Uniform Ensemble 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 $927 Tota] 1,002 1,002 1,002 1,002 1,002 1,002 1,002 1,002 1,002 1,002 Population 88,173 88,552 88,355 88,721 89,885 90,250 91,042 91,316 91,771 92,334 ‘Per Capita Standard (per 1,000) 11.36 11.32 11.34 t 11.29 11.15 11.10 , 11.01 10.97 10.92 10.85 10 Year Average 2008-2017 Quantity Standard (per 1,000) 11.13 Quality Standard $1,922 Service Standard $21 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population .74,362 $ per Capita $21 Eligible Amount $1,590,603 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Pickering 2017 DC v26 City of Pickering Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Fire Vehicles No. of vehicles Page 83 Description 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Value ($Nehicle) Quint / 32m Aerial 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _ 1 1 $1,510,900 Tanker 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 $506,200 Pumper 2 2 2 1 1 2 - - - $956,100 Pumper/Tanker 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - $731,100 Rescue 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $1,349,800 Pumper/Rescue 2 2 2 4 4 3 5 5 5 5 $900,000 Car, SUV& Pick-up 15 - 15 - 15 15 - 15 1 15 1 15 1 15 1 13 1 13 1 $45,000 $990,000 Quint 117m Ladder Telesquirts 1 1 1 1 - - - _ - - - $956,100 Grass Fire Truck 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - $393,700 Support Vehicle 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $562,400 Platoon Chief SUV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $115,200 Antique 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $112,500 Trailer 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 $11,200 Total 33 33 33 34 33 33 33 33 31 30 JPOuIatiOn 88,173 88,552 88,355 88,721 89,885 90,250 91,042 91,316 91,771 92,334 Per Capita Standard (per 1000) 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.38 0.37 0.37 0.36 0.36 0.34 0.32 10 Year Average 2008-2017 Quantity Standard (per 1,000) 0.36 Quality Standard $362,964 Service Standard $131 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 74,362 $ per Capita $131 Eligible Amount 89,743,653 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Pickering 2017 DC v26 City of Pickering Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: By -Law and Animal Services Enforcement Facilities ft2 of building area Page 84 Description 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Bldg Value (s/ft2),site Value/ft2 with land, works, etc. Animal Services (Lease) 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 $350 $425 By -Law 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 $296 $383 Total 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 Population 88,173 88,552 88,355 88,721 89,885 90,250 91,042 91,316 91,771 92,334 Per Capita Standard (per 1,000) 48.77 48.56 48.67 48.47 47.84 47.65 47.23 47.09 46.86 46.57 10 Year Average 12008-2017 Quantity Standard 47.77 Quality Standard $410 Service Standard $20 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 74,362 $ per Capita $20 Eligible Amount $1,457,495 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Pickering 2017 DC v26 City of Pickering Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: By -Law and Animal Services Enforcement Vehicles ioment Page 85 "" ' 'YYVY'v Description 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Value ($Vehicle) Truck (By-law) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 $31,400 SUV (By-law)- - - - 1 1 1 3 3 3 $25,500 Car (By-law) 3 3 3 3 3 . 3 3 3 2 2 $21,900 Van (Animal Services) 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 $38,600 Total 5 5 5 5 j 7 7 7 9 9 9 Population 88,173 88,552 88,355 88,721 89,885 90,250 91,042 91,316 91,771 92,334 Per Capita Standard (per,1000) 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.10 10 Year Average 2008-2017 Quantity Standard (per 1,000) 0.08 Quality Standard $28,154 Service Standard $2 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 74,362 $ per Capita $2 Eligible Amount $157,647 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Pickering 2017 DC v26 City of Pickering Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: • Roads -line km of roadways Page 86 ....-"NVN -- Description 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Value ($/km) Asphalt - Collector - 3 Lane 36.5 36.9 37.0 37.8 40.2 42.7 41.3 41.3 41.3 41.3 $1,550,000 Asphalt - Arterial C - 4 Lane 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 $2,200,000 Gravel - Rural - 2 Lane 110.4 107.9 107.2 107.2 106.7 106.7 104.5 101.0 101.2 105.5 $900,000 Total 159 157 157 158 159 162 158j 155 155 159 Population 88,173 88,552 88,355 88,721 89,885 90,250 91,042 91,316 91,771 92,334 Per Capita Standard (per 1,900) 1.81 1.78 1.77 1.78 1.77 1.79 1.74 1.70 1.69 1.73 10 Year Average 2008-2017 Quantity Standard (per 1,000) 1.75 Quality Standard $1,165,764 Service Standard $2,046 DC Amount (before deductions) 14 -Year (Rest of Pickering) Forecast Population 28,936 $ per Capita $2,046 Eligible Amount $59,197,269 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Pickering 2017 DC v26 City of Pickering Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Bridges, Culverts & Structures No. of BridgesCulverts & Structures Page 87 Description 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Value ($/item) Bridge (over3m) 41 41 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 29 $1,138,000 Culvert (over3m) 15 15 25 25 27 27 26 26 24 24 $270,000 Pedestrian Bridge (over3m) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 $489,000 Total 65 65 65 65 67 67 66 66 62 62 Population 88,173 88,552 88,355 88,721 89,885 90,250 91,042 91,316 91,771 92,334 Per Capita Standard (per 1,000) 0.74 0.73 0.74 0.73 0.75 0.74 0.72 0.72 0.68 , 0.67 10 Year Average 2008-2017 Quantity Standard (per 1,000) 0.72 Quality Standard $735,946 Service Standard $532 DC Amount (before deductions) 14 -Year (Rest of Pickering) Forecast Population 28,936 $ per Capita $532 Eligible Amount $15,379,484 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Pickering 2017 DC v26 City of Pickering Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Sidewalks Linear Metres of Sidewalks Page 88 Description 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Value ($/linear metre) Sidewalk - Concrete 285,866 286,663 286,663 290,055 292,902 295,431 295,431 295,431 298,032 298,032 , $260 Sidewalk - Concrete (Block) 3,731 3,731 3,731 3,731 3,731 3,731 3,731 3,788 3,856 3,856 $300 Sidewalk- Concrete Multi Use Path 95 95 95 95 648 648 648 1,020 1,020 1,020 $300 Sidewalk - Temporary Asphalt 6,235 1,997 6,235 1,997 6,235 1,997 6,745 1,997 6,745 1,997 6,745 2,813 6,745 3,981 6,745 5,061 6,745 5,744 6,745 5,744- $120 $225 Sidewalk - Asphalt Multi Use Path Total 297,924 298,7211 298,721 302,623 306,023] 309,368 310,536 312,045 315,397 315,397 Population 88,173 88,552 88,355 88,721 89,885 90,250 91,042 91,316 91,771 92,334 Per Capita Standard 3.38 3.37 3.38 3.41 3.40 3.43 3.41 3.42 3.44 3.42 10 Year Average 2008-2017 Quantity Standard 3.41 Quality Standard $257 Service Standard $876 DC Amount (before deductions) 14 -Year (Rest of Pickering) Forecast Population 28,936 per Capita $876 Elgible Amount $25,345,042 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Pickering 2017 DC v26 City of Pickering Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Traffic Signals No. of Traffic Signals Page 89 Description 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Value ($/item) Traffic Signals 9 9 9 10 10 12 12 13 14 14 . $175,000 Intersection Pedestrian Signals (IPS) 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 $100,000 Total 20 20 20 j 21 21 1 23 i 23 24 25 25 Population 88,173 88,552 88,355 88,721 89,885 90,250 91,042 91,316 91,771 92,334 Per Capita Standard (per 1,000) 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.23 0.25 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.27 10 Year Average 2008-2017 Quantity Standard (per 1,000) 0.25 Quality Standard $137,231 Service Standard $34 DC Amount (before deductions) 14 -Year (Rest of Pickering) Forecast Population 28,936 $ per Capita $34 Eligible Amount $978,037 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Pickering 2017 DC v26 City of Pickering Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Roads Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Page 90 Description 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Value ($/tem) Vehicles D,01-01 - Car 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - $22,400 D.01-02 - Sport Utility Vehicles (SUVs) 14 13 14 14 14 14 13 13 15 17 $35,000 D.01-04 - Truck - Pick-up 7 7 7 8 11 11 12 14 11 10 $37,000 D.01-05 - Truck - Mid -Size 6 7 10 8 8 10 11 11 10 10 $60,800 D.01-06 - Dump Truck I Snow Plow 13 13 14 15 14 14 14 14 17 16 $217,400 Equipment C.01-01 - Excavators 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 $357,700 C.01-02 - Graders 2 4 3 3 3 4 3 2 2 2 $316,700 C.01-03 - Loaders 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 $181,200 C.01-04 - Backhoes -- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $97,900 C.01.05 - Street Sweepers 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 $340,000 0.02-02 - Trailers 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 $11,200 C.02-03 - Asphalt Equipment 4 4 4 5 6 5 5 5 6 6 $25,300 C.02-04 - Utility Tractors 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $78,200 C.02-05 -Mowers 2 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 $29,300 Miscellaneous Equipment 12 13 15 15 15 17 20 102 102 104 $4,800 (Total 72 78 85 85 89 92 94 178 179 181 Population 88,173 88,552 88,355 88,721 89,885 90,250 91,042 91,316 91,771 92,334 Per Capita Standard {per 1000} 0.82 0.88 0.96 , 0.96 0.99 1.02 , 1.03 1.95 1.95 i 1.96 10 Year Average 2008-2017 Quantity Standard (per,1000) 1.25 Quality Standard $70,272 Service Standard $88 DC Amount (before deductions) 14 Year {City Wide) Forecast Population 86,968 $ per Capita $88 Eligible Amount $7.651,445 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Pickering 2017 DC v26 City of Pickering Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Depots and Domes ft2 of building area Page 91 Description 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Bldg Value (Sift') with land, with site works, etc. Operations Centre i (shared) 15,749 15,749 15,749 15,749 15,749 15,749 15,749 21,874 21,874 21,874 $319 $514 Roads Drive Shed 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 750 1,900 7,850 $49 $32 $36 $60 $100 $79 $91 $109 Roads Storage Shed 750 1,900 750 1,900 750 1,900 750 1,900 _ 7,850 750 1,900 7,850 750 1,900 7,850 750 1,900 7,850 750 1,900 7,850 750 1,900 7,850 Roads Sign Storage Salt Dome 7,850 7,850 7,850 Sand Dome 7,850 7,850 7,850 7,850 7,850 7,850 7,850 7,850 7,850 7,850 $52 $101 Total 46,599 46,599 46,599 46,599 46,599 46,599 46,599 52,724 52,724 52,724 Population 88,173 88,552 88,355 88,721 89,885 90,250 91,042 91,316 91,771 92,334 Per Capita Standard 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.52 0.52 0.51 0.58 0.57 0.57 10 Year Average 2008-2017 Quantity Standard 0.54 Quality Standard $251 Service Standard $135 DC Amount (before deductions) 14 Year (City - Wide) Forecast Population 86,968 $ per Capita $135 Eligible Amount $11,751,116 Watson & Associates.Economists Ltd. The City leased 10,000 sq.ft. of the Operations Centre to Durham Transit until 2014. Pickering 2017 DC v26 City of Pickering Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Development Acres of Parkland Page 92 Description 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 _ 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Value ($/Acre) Village Green 0.6 0.6 0.6 1.4 1.4 $300,000 Neighbourhood Active 151 151 151 151 152 157 157_ 174 157 174 157 174 157 174 $117,600 $135,000 Active 174 174 174 174 174 174 _Community District Active _ 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 $135,000 Passive Parkland 371 377 477 477 476 477 477 478 478 478 $63,200 Total 709 715 815 815 815 821 822 823 8231 823 Population 88,173 88,552 88,355 88,721 89,885 90,250 91,042 91,316 91,771 92,334 Per Capita Standard (per 1,000) 8.04 8.07 9.22 9.19 9.07 9.10 9.02 9.01 8.97 8.92 10 Year Average _ 2008-2017 Quantity Standard (per,1000) 8.8613 Quality Standard $90,680 Service Standard $804 DC Amount (before deductions) _ 10 Year Forecast Population 74,362 $ per Capita $804 Eligible Amount $59,752,841 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Pickering 2017 DC v26 City of Pickering Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Trails Development Metres of Paths and Trails Description 2005 2009 2010 2011 2092 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Value $/metre Duffins Creek Trail. Ajax to Finch Ave. 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 $100 Alex Robertson Park walk 1,291 1291 1,291 1,291 1291 1,291 1291 1,291 1,291 1291 $100 Diana, Princess of Wales Park walk 2,074 330 ® 30 2,074 330 112 30 .2,074 330 112 30 2,074 330 112 30 330 112 30 2074 330 112 - 30 330 112 30 2.074 330 112 30 330 112 30 2,074 330 112 30 $100 $100 5100 $5.625 Progress Frenchman's Bay East Park Pine Creek Trail walkway - Kitley Ave. to Storrington St. Pine Creek Trail walkway - Storrington Bridge Waterfront Trail system: 3,720 3,720 3,720 3,720 3,720 .. 3,720 31720 3,720 3,720 .. 3,720 $150 Peak Trail: Frisco Road to Beachfront Park Peak Trail: Beachfront Park boardwalk 566 566 566 566 566 566 566 566 566 566 $1,507 Peak Trail: Annland St, Liverpool to Front 5t. 190 673 232 36 486 190 673 232 36 486 190 673 232 36 486 190 673 232 36 486 190 ® 232 36 486 190 673 232 36 486 190 673 232 36 486 190 673 = 232 36 486 190 673 232 36 456 190 673 232 36 486 $150 5150 $150 $7,050 5150 Monarch Trail along Bayly St.: St Martin's Dr. to West Sho Monarch Trail: West Shore CC to Vistula Dr. (less bridge} Monarch Trail: Amberlea Bridge Monarch Trail: Eivira Court to Breez Drive Bruce Hansco Monarch Trail: Sunrise Ave. to Beachpoint Promenade 314 314 314 314 314 314 314 314 314 $150 First Nations Trail: Marksbur to Rodd Ave. (less bridge 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 224 $150 Fl tN.tl nsTcF - B i 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 _ 172 172 _ $7,050 Fial cor 86 A9 R u:- Riv- 1- • •q4 642 642 642 642 642 642 642 642 642 642 5150 Fithr9rirrill G- -, y B u •- 41 - 375 41 375 41 375 41 375 41 375 41 375 41 375 41 375 41 375 $7 050 5150 Duffins Creek Trail system: Duffins Creek Trai€: Finch Ave. east of Brock Road Duffins Creek Trail: Brockridge Park to Liverpool Road 2,189 2,189 2,189 2,189 2,189 2,189 2,189 2,189 2,189 $150 Multi -use paths: Pickering Parkway: Village East Park to Liverpool Road 205 1,763 (w. side 205 1,763 - 205 MI 205 1,763 205 ® 205 1,763 205 1,763 705 1,763 - 705 1,763 1,357 705 1,515 5150 5150 5150 $150 Brock Road: Pickering Parkway to Finch Ave. Brock Road: Brockridge Park to Third Concession Road Brock Road: Third Concession Road to north of Zents Drive Brock Road: Third Concession Road to north of Zents Drive e. side 388 388 388 388 388 1,515 388 $150 6150 Dersan Street: Brack Road to Tillings Road Tillings Road: Dersan Street to Zents Drive 391 536 391 536 391 536 391 ® 391 _ $150 5150 Zents Drive: Brock Road to Tillings Road William Jackson Drive: Brock Road to Earl Grey Drive 500 500 500 500 997 5150 Altana Road: Kingston Road to Strouds pane 1 543 1,543_ 1,543 1 543 1,543 1,543 5150 Total 14,474 14,474 14 474 16,405NIBMIIIIKIEREI�. c Population 88,173 88,552 88,355 88,721 89,885 90,250 91,042 91,316 91,771 92,334 Per Ca•ita Standard D.16 0.16 0.16 0.18 0.18 0.19 D.20 0.20 0.20 0-25 10 Year Average 2008-2017 _ Quantity Standard (per 1,000) 0.19 Quality Standard 5306 1 Service Standard $58 DC Amount.(before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 74,362 per Capita $58 Eligible Amount 64,304,816 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Page 93 Pickering 2017 DC v26 City of Pickering Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks and Recreation Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and eouioment Page 94 Description 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Value ($/item) Vehicles D.01-01 - Car 2 2 2 2 2 1 - - - - $22,400 L7.01-02 - Sport Utility Vehicles (SU1i 2 2 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 2 $32,500 D.01-03 - Van 3 3 3 3 3 5 6 7 6 6 $39,300 D.01-04 - Truck - Pick-up 13 9 10 9 11 9 11 9 12 9 11 9 11 9 13 9 11 9 11 11 $37,000 $65,000 D.01-05 - Truck - Mid -Size D.01-07 - Garbage Packer 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 $150,000 Equipment C.01-01 - Excavators - - - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 $51,400 C.01-03 - Loaders 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $181,200 C.01-04- Backhoes 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 $109,300 C.01-06 - Multi -Purpose Tractors 6 3 7 3 6 4 6 5 7 5 7 5 7 6 10 6 10 5 8 5 $123,900 $90,400 C.01-07 - Outfront Mowers C.01-08 - Ice Resurfacers 4 4 4 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 $84,500 C.02-01 - Enclosed Trailer - - - 1 2 4 5 6 7 7 $10,300 C.02-02 -Trailers 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 5 5 5 $8,100 C.02-04 - Utility Tractors 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 9 10 $37,800 C.02-05 - Mowers 20 20 22 24 22 26 30 34 33 33 $10,700 C.03-01 - Plows - 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 2 $6,300 Miscellaneous Equipment 29 35 38 _ 44 45 54 60 65 68 74 $16,000 Total 103 110 117 128 ® 148 160 179 179 186 11111111111 Population 88,173 88,552 88,355 88,721 89,885 90,250 91,042 91,316- 91,771 92,334 Per Capita Standard (per 1,000) 1.17 1.24 1.32 1.44 1.48 1.64 1.76 1.96 1.95 , 2.01 10 Year Average 2008-2017 1 Quantity Standard (per 1,000) 1.60 Quality Standard $35,960 Service Standard $57 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 74,362 $ per Capita $57 Eligible Amount $4,272 841 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Pickering 2017 DC v26 City of Pickering Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks and Recreation Facilities ft2 of building area Page 95 Description 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Bldg Value ($/ft) Valuefft2 with land, site works, etc. Community Centres 132,766 132,766 132,766 132,766 132,766 132,766 132,766 130,716 131,616 131,616 $291 $371 Seniors Recreation Centres 10,850 10,850 10,850 10,850 10,850 10,850 10,850 10,850 10,850 10,850 $291 $371 Indoor Pools 35,650 35,650 35,650 35,650 35,650 35,650 35,650 35,650 35,650 35,650 $291 $371 Arenas 151,252 151,252 151,252 167,593 167,593 167,593 167,593 167,593 167,593 167,593 $291 $371 Fitness Facilities/Racquet Sports 44,591 - 61,909 61,909 - 61,909 - 61,909 - 61,909 - 61,909 105,293 61,909 105,293 61,909 105,293 61,909 105,293 $291 $70 $371 $82 ]ndoor Soccer Centre Parks Drive Shed 2,235 2,235 2,235 2,235 2,235 2,235 2,235 2,235 2,235 2,235 $42 $90 Parks Storage Shed 2,235 2,235 2,235 2,235 2,235 2,235 2,235 2,235 2,235 2,235 $26 $74 935 Dillingham Rd. (Rental Storage Space) - 9,966 - - 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 $319 $514 Operations Centre' (shared) 9,966 9,966 9,966 9,966 9,966 9,966 13,841 13,841 13,841 $319 $514 Total 389,545 1 406,863 406,863 427,604 427,604 427,604 532,897 534,7221 535,622 L 531,222 Population 88,173 88,552 88,355 88,721 89,885 90,250 91,042 91,316 91,771 92,334 Per Capita Standard 4.42 4.59 4.60 4.82 4.76 4.74 5.85 5.86 5.84 5.75 10 Year Average 2008-2017 Quantity Standard 5.12 Quality Standard $346 Service Standard $1,774 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year J Forecast Population 74,362 $ per Capita $1,774 Eligible Amount - 131,908,521 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 1 The City leased 10,000 sq.ft. of the Operations Centre to Durham Transit until 2014. Pickering 2017 DC v26 City of Pickering Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Library Facilities ft2 of building area Page 96 Description 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Bld'g Value ($/ftZ) Value/ft2 with land, site works, etc. Central Library 34,165 34,165 34,165 34,165 34,165 34,165 34,165 34,165 34,165 34,165 $380 $491 Claremont Branch 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 $289 $369 Greenwood Branch 4,900 4,900 4,900 4,900 4,900 4,900 4,900 4,900 $194 $216 Whitevae Branch 900 900 900 900 900 $259 $382 Petticoat Creek 9,369 9,369 9,369 9,369 9,369 9,369 9,369 9,369 9,369 9,369 $568 $738 notal 51,000 51,000 1 51,000 1 51,000 1 51,000 50,100 f 50,100 50,100 45,200 45,200 Population 88,173 88,552 88,355 88,721 89,885 90,250 91,042- 91,316 91,771 92,334 Per Capita Standard 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.57 0.57 0.56 0.55 0.55 0.49 0.49 C 10 Year Average 2008-2017 Quantity Standard 0.55 Quality Standard $511 Service Standard $281 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year j Forecast Population 74,362 $ per Capita $281 Eligible Amount $20,918,774 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Pickering 2017 DC v26 City of Pickering Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Knit Measure: Library Collection Materials No. of library collection items Page 97 Description 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Value ($/item) Books 188,916 206,157 215,357 247,434 183,883 198,883 229,907 192,347 166,535 160,000 $18 Non -books 31,590 24,934 29,921 40,499 46,230 52,230 41,903 52,785 51,088 49,000 - $30 Magazine Titles 424 426 428 441 430 429 218 203 203 195 $130 Electronic Collections 8,440 10,753 20,267 30,849 46,070_ 60,729 91,485 102,450 _ 132,063 170,000 $50 Electronic Products 26 63 55 29 29 29 28 27 18 20 $5,203 Total 229,396 242,333 266,028 319,252 276,642 312,300 r 363,541 347,812 349,907 379,215 Population 88,173 88,552 88,355 88,721 89,885 90,250 91,042 91,316 91,771 92,334 Per Capita Standard 2.60 2.74 3.01 3.60 3.08 , 3.46 3.99 3.81 3.81 4.11 10 Year Average . 2008-2017 Quantity Standard 3.42 Quality Standard $27 Service Standard $93 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 74,362 $ per Capita $93 Eligible Amount $6,923,102 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Pickering 2017 DC v26 City of Pickering Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Library Vehicles Noof library collection items Page 98 Population Description 2008 88,355 2009 89,885 2010 91,042 2011 91,771 2012 Per Capita Standard (per 1,000) 2013 0.0113 2014 0.0113 _ 2015 0.0111 2016 0.0110 2017 0.0108 2017 Value ($/item) Vans 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $37,600 Total 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Population 88,173 88,552 88,355 88,721 89,885 90,250 91,042 91,316 91,771 92,334 Per Capita Standard (per 1,000) 0.0113 0.0113 0.0113 0.0113 _ 0.0111 0.0111 0.0110 0.0110 0.0109 0.0108 10 Year Average 2008-2017 Quantity Standard (per 1,000) 0.0111 Quality Standard $37,631 Service Standard $0.42 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 74,362 per Capita $0.42 Eligible Amount $31,061 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Pickering 2017 DC v26 Page 99 Appendix C - D.C. Cash Flow Calculation Tables Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. HAFickering12017 DC StudylReportlPickering DC Background Study-Finai. docx Page 100 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Protection Services - Residential Dev't Related Expenditures interest Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening SDE per Year DC Rates w. Anticipated Revenues minus Debenture Financing (2.5% on positive DC Reserve Fund Closing Balance Nominal Inflated (3% Inflation (3%/Yr) Revenues Expenditures Requirement balances & 5% on negative balances) Balance after Financing 2018 $ (198,257) $ (45,037) $ (46,388) 2,499 $ 889 $ 2221,744 $ 2,175,357 $ 19,757 $ 1,996,857 201 9 $ 1,996,857 $ (5,881,659) $ (6,239,852) 2,499 $ 916 $ 2,288,397 $ (3,951,456) $ (23,904) $ (1,978,503) 2020 $ (1,978,503 $ (4,294,492) $ (4,692,707) 2,499 $ 943 $ 2,357,049 $ (2,335,658) $ (157,317) $ (4,471,4781 2021 " $ (4,471,478) $ (318,524) $ (358,502) 2,499 $ 972 $ 2427,760 $ 2,069,258 $ (171,842) $ (2,574,062) 2022 $ (2,574,062) $ (10,814) $ (12,537) 2,499 $ 1,001 $ 2,500,593 $ 2,488,056 $ (66,502) $ (152,507) 2023 $ (152,507) $ (8,479,374) $ (10,124,816) 2,155 $ 1,031 $ 2,221,285 $ (7,903,531) $ (205,214) $ (8,261,252) 2024 $ (8,261,252) $ (318,524) $ (391,745) 2,155 $ 1,062 $ 2,287,923 $ 1,896,179 $ (365,658) $ (6,730,731) 2025 $ (6,730,731) $ (10,814) $ (13,699) 2,155 $ 1,094 $ 2,356,561 $ 2,342,862 $ (277,965) $ (4,665,834) 2026 $ (4,665,834) $ (10,814) $ (14,110) 2,155 $ 1126 $ 2,427,258 $ 2,413,148 $ (172,963) $ (2,425,650) 2027 $ (2425,650) $ (10,814) $ (14,534) 2,155 $ 1,160 $ 2,500,076 $ 2,485,542 $ (59,893) $ - Page 101 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Protection Services - Seaton Prestige Employment Land Dev't Related Expenditures Interest D.C. Reserve Net Hectares DC Rates w. Anticipated Revenues Debenture (2.5% on positive DC Reserve Fund Closing Year Fund Opening Nominal Inflated (3%/Yr) per Year Inflation (3%Nr) Revenues minus Financing balances & 5% Balance after Balance Expenditures Requirement on negative balances) Financing 2018 $ (20,055) $ (4,556) $ (4,693) 18 $ 11,431 $ 209,994 $ 205,301 $ 1,814 $ 187,060_ 2019 $ 187,060 $ (594,980) $ (631,215) 18 $ 11,774 $ 216,294 $ (414,921)_ $ (3,358) 5 (231,219) 2020 $ (231,219) $ (434,425) $ (474,708) 18 $ 12,127 $ 222,783 $ (251,925) $ (17,859) $ 501,093( 2021 $ (501,003) $ (32,221) $ (36,266) 18 $ 12,491 $ _ 229,466 $ 193,200 $ (20,220) $ (328,023) 2022 $ (328,023) $ (1,094) $ (1,268) 18 $ 12,865 $ 235,350 $ 235,082 $ (10,524) $ (103,465) 2023 $ (103,465) $ (857,762) $ (1,024,212) 18 $ 13,252 $ 243,441 $ (780,772) $ (24,69) $ (908,930) 2024 $ (908,930) $ (32,221) $ (39,628) 18 $ 13,649 $ 250,744 $ 211,115 $ (40,169) $ (737,983) 2025 $ (737,983) $ (1,094) $ (1,386} 18 $ 14,059 $ 258,266 $ 256,880 $ (30,477) $ (511,580) 2026 $ (511,580) $ (1,094) $ (1,427) 18 $ 14,481 $ 266,014 $ 264,587 $ (18,964) $ (265,957) 2027 $ (265,957) $ (1,094) $ (1,470) 18 $ 14,915 5 273,994 $ 272,524 $ (6,567) $ - Page 102 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Protection Services - Other Non -Residential Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Dev't Related Expenditures DC Rates w. inflation {3%/Yr) Anticipated Revenues Revenues Expenditures Debenture Financing g Requirement Interest (2.5% on positive balances & 5% on negative balances) DC Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Financing Nominal Inflated (3%/Yr) 2018 $ (35,863) $ (8,147) $ 8,391) 1,t18,519 $ 0.34 $ 375,513 $ 367,122 $ 3,244 $ 334,503- 34,5032019 2 0 1 9 $ 334,503 $ (1,063,949) $ (1,128,744) 1,118,519 $ 0.35 $ 386,778 $ (741,965) $ (6,005) $ (31,936) $ {36,158) $ (413.468) $ (895,898( $ (586,574) 2020 $ (413,468) $ (776,842) $ (848,876) 1,118,519 $ 0.36 $ 398,382 $ (450,495) 2021 $ (895898) $ (57,619) $ (64,850) 1,118,519 $ 0.37 $ 410,333 $ 345,483 2022 $(586,574). $ (1,956) $ (1,533,857) $ (2,268) $ (1,831,505) 1,118,519 1,118,519 $ 0.38 $ 0.39 $ 422,643 $ 435,322 $ 420,375 $ (1,396,183) $ (18,819) $ (44,155) $ (185,18D18 $ (1,625,356) $ (1,319,667) 6- (914,811) $ (475,587) $ (0) 2023 $ (185,018) 2024 $ (1,625,356) $ (57,619) $ (70,864) 1,118,519 $ 0.40 $ 448,382 $ 377,518 $ (71,830) 2025 $ (1,319,667) $ (1,956) $ (1,956) $ (2,478) $ (2,552) 1,118,519 1,118,519 $ 0.41 $ 0.43 $ 461,834 $ 475,689 $ 459,355 $ 473,136 $ (54,499) $ (33,912) $ (11,743) 2026 $ (914,811) 2027 $ (475,587) $ (1,656) $ (2,629)_ 1,118,519 $ 0.44 $ 489,959 $ 487,330 Page 103 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Transportation Services - Residential Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance g Dev't Related Expenditures SDE per Year DC Rates w. Inflation (3%IYr) Anticipated Revenues Revenues minus Expenditures Debenture Financing Requirement Interest (2.5% on positive balances & 5% on negative DC Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Financing Nominal Inflated (3%/Yr) 2018 $ 16789,573 $ (4,976,978) $ (5,126,288) _ 1,145 6,517 7,463,564 $ 2,337,276 $ 448,955 $ 19,575,805 2019 $ 19,575,805 $ (8,467,992) $ (8,983,693) 1,145 6,712 7,687,471 $ {1,296,222) $ 473,192 $ 18,752,776 2020 $ 18,752776 $ (7,482297) $ (8,175,108) 1,145 6,913 7,918,095 $ (258,013) $ 465,594 $ 18,960.357 2021 $ 18,960,357 $ (10,341,933) $ (11,639,937) 1,145 7,121 8,155,638 $ (3,484,299) $ 430,455 $ 15,906,514 2022 $ 15,906,514 $ (7,482,297) $ (8,674,033) 1,145 7,334 8,400,307 $ (273726) $ 394,241 $ 16,027,029 2023 $ 16,027,029 $ (7,482,297) $ (8,934,254) 802 7,554 6,055,508_ $ (2,878,745) 5 364,691 5 13,512974 2024 5 13,512,974 $ (7,482297) 5 (9,202,282) 802 802 802 802 76 76 7,781 8,015 8255 8,503 8,758 9,020 6,237,173 6,424,288 6,617,017 6,815,527 663,317 683,217 $ (2,965,109) $ 1,846,353 $ 1,901,743 $ 1,958,795 $ (4,339,117) $ (4,469,290) $ 300,761 $ 294,295 $ 348,504 $ 405,473 $ 385,856 $ 285,397 $ 10,848,526 $ 12,989,274 $ 15,239,521 $ 17,603,789 $ 13,650,528 $ 9,466,635_ $ 5,042,390 2025 $ 10,848,626 $ (3,613,865) $ (L577,936) $ (4,715,2741 2026 $ 12,989,274 $ (3,613,865) 2027 $ 15,239,521 $ (3,613,865) $ (4,856,732) $ (5,002,4341 2028 $ 17,603,789 $ {3,613,865) 2029 $ 13,650,528 $ (3,613,865) $ (5,152,507 2030 $ 9,466,635 $ (3,613,865) $ (5,307,082) 76 9,291 703,713 $ (4,603,369) $ 179,124 2031 $ 5,042,390 $ (3,613.865) $ (5.466,295) 38 9,570 362,412 $ (5,103,882) $ 61,493 $ - Page 104 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Transportation Services - Non -Residential - Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening° Balance Dev't Related Expenditures GFA per Year DC Rates w. Inflation (370/Yr) Anticipated Revenues Revenues minus Expenditures Debenture Financing Requirement Interest (2.5% on positive balances & 5% on negative bnces) DC Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Financing Nominal Inflated (3 /°IYr} 2018 $ 1,459,963 $ (432781) $ [445,764) 279,599 $ 1.83 $ 510,329 $ 64,565 $ 37,306 $ 1,561,834 2019 $ 1,561,834 $ (736,347) $ (781,191) 279,598 $ 1.88 $ 525,639 $ (255,552) 3 35,851 $ 1,342,133 2023 $ 1,342,133 $ (650,635) $ (710,966) 279,599 $ 1.94 $ 541,408 $ (169,558) $ 31,434 $ 1,204,009 2021 $ 1,204,009 9 (899,299) $ (1,012,168) 279,599 $ 1.99 $ 557,650 $ (454,518) $ 24,419 $ 773,910 2022 $ 773,910 $ (650,635) 3 {754,264) 279,599 $ 2.05 $ 574,380 $ (179,884) $ 17,099 $ 611,125 2023 $ 611,125 $ (650,635) $ (776,89) 279,599 $ 2.12 $ 591,611 $ (185,281) $ 12,962 $ 438,807 2024 $ 438,807 $ (650,635) $ (800,198) 279,599 $ 2.18 $ 609,359 $ (190,839) $ 8,585 $ 256,552 2025 $ 256,552 $ (314,249) $ (398,081) 279,599 $ 2.24 $ _ 627,640 $ 229,559 $ 9,283 3 495,395 2026 $ 495,395 $ (314,249) $ (410,024) 279,599 $ 2.31 $ 646,469 $ 236,446 $ 15,340 $ 747,181 2027 $ 747,181 $ (314,249) $ (422,325) 279,599 $ 2.38 $ 665,864 $ 243,539 $ 21,724 $ 1,012443 2028 3 1,012,443 $ {314,249) $ (434,994) 84,250 $ 2.45 $ 206,660 $ (228,335) $ 22,457 $ 806.566 2029 $ 806,566 $ {314,249) $ (448,044) 84,250 $ 2.53 $ 212,859 $ (235,185) $ 17,224 $ 588,605 2030 $ 588,605 $ (314,249) $ (461,485) 84,250 $ 2.60 $ 219,245 $ (242,240) $ 11,687 $ 358,052 2031 ; $ 358,052 $ (314,249) $ (475,330) 42,125 $ 2.68 $ 112,911 3 {362,419) $ 4,366 $ - Page 105 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Other Services Related to a Highway - Residential Year D,C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Dev't Related Expenditures SDE per Yearo DC Rates w. inflation (3%/Yr) Anticipated Revenues Revenues minus Expenditures Debenture Financing Requirement Interest (2.5% on positive balances & 5% on negative balances} DC Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Financing Nominal Inflated (3%/Yr) 2018 $ 113,900 $ (492,174) $ (506,939) 2,499 $ 441 $ 1,101,810 $ 594,871 $ (539,884) 8 3,535 $ 9,392 $ 172,422 $ 588,300 2019 $ 172,422 $ (177,674) $ (188,494) 2,499 $ 454 $ 1,134,864 $ 946,370 $ (539,884) 2020 $ 588,390 $ (384,874) $ (420,562) 2,499 $ 468 $ 1,168,910 $ 748,348 $ (539,884) $ 17,313 $ 814,077 2021 $ 814,077 $ (108,431) $ (122,040) 2,499 $ 482 $ 1,203,977 $ 1,981,937 $ (539,884) $ 27,128 $ 1,383,258_ 2022 $ 1.383,258 $ (108,431) $ (125,701) 2,499 $ 496 $ 1,240,097 $ 1,114,395 $ (539,884) $ 41,763 $ 1,999,533 2023 $ 1,999,533 $ (108,431) $ (129,472) 2,155 $ 511 $ 1,101,582 $ 972,109 $ (539,884) $ 55,391 $ 2,487,150 2024 $ 2,487,150 $ (4123,671) $ (5,071,595) 2,155 $ 527 $ 1,134,629 $ (3,936,966) $ 1,031,311 $ 1,062,250 $ (539,884) $ (539,884) $ (539,884) $ (539,884( $ - $ (18,653) $ (88,1321 $ {67,194) $ (43,638) $ (26,119) $ (15,560) $ (4,638) $ 452 $ (2,008,353) $ (1,605,057) $ 11,149,884) $ (639,288) $ (431,608) $ (206,353) $ 37,047 $ (9) 2025 $ (2,008,353) $ (108,431) $ (137,357) 2,155 $ 542 , $ 1,168,668 2026 $ (1,605,057) $ (106,431) $ (141,478) 2,155 $ 559 $ 1,203,728 2027 $ (1,149,884) $ (108,431) $ (145,722) $ (302,434) 2,155 905 $ 575 $ 593 $ 1,239,840 $ 536,235 $ 1,094,118 $ 233,800 2028 $ (639,288) $ (218,485) 2029 $ (431,608) $ (206,353) $ (218,485) $ (218,485) $ (311;507) $ (320,853) 905 905 $ 610 $ 629 $ 552,322 $ 568,891 $ 240,814 $ 248,039 $ - $ - $ - 2030 2031 $ 37,047 $ (218,485) $ (330,478) 452 $ 648 $ 292,979 $ (37,499) Page 106 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis • Other Services Related to a Highway - Seaton Prestige Employment Land Year D,C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Dev't Related Expenditures Net Hectares per Year DC Rates w. Inflation (3%IYr) Anticipated Revenues Revenues minus Expenditures Debenture Financing Requirement Interest (2.5% on positive o balances & 5% on negative balances) DC Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Financing Nominal Inflated (3%/Yr) 2018 $ 13,064 $ (56,452)`$ (58,145) 18 $ 5,451 $ 100,140 $ 41,995 $ (61,924) $ (8) $ (6,873) 2019 $ (6,873) $ (20,379) $ (21,620) 18 $ 5,615 $ 103,144 $ 81,524 $ (61,924) $ (13) $ 12,714 2020 $ 12714 $ (44,145) $ (48,238) 18 $ 5,783 $ 106,239 $ 58,001 $ (61,924) $ 269 $ 9,059 2021 $ 9,059 $ (12,437) $ (13,998) 18 $ 5,957 $ 109,426 $ 95,428 $ (61,924) $ 645 $ 43,208 2022 $ 43,208 $ (12,437) $ (14,418) 18 $ 6,135 $ 112,709 $ 98,291 $ (61,924) $ 1,535 $ 61,110 2023 $ 81,110 $ (12,437) $ (14,850) 18 $ 6,319 $ 116,090 $ 101,240 $ (61,924) $ 2,519 $ 122,945 2024 $ 122,945 $ (472,981) $ (581,707) 18 $ 6,509 $ 119,573 $ (462,134) $ (61,924) $ (8,491) $ (409,605 2025 $ (409,605) $ (12,437) $ (15,755) 18 $ 6,704 $ 123,160 $ 107,405 $ (61,924) $ (19,343) $ (383,467) 2026 $ (383,467) $ (12,437) $ (16,227) 18 $ 6,905 $ 126,855 $ 110,627 $ (61,924) $ (17,956) $ (352,720) 2027 $ (352,720) $ (12,437) $ (16,714) 18 $ 7,113 $ 130,690 $ 113,946 $ (61,924) $ (16,335) $ (317,033) 2028 $ (317,033) $ X25,060) $ (34,689) 18 $ 7,326 $ 134,580 $ 99,891 $ - $ (13,354) $ (230,497) 2029 $ (230,497) $ (25,060) $ (35,730) 18 $ 7,546 $ 138617 $ 102,888 $ - $ (8,953) $ (136,561) 2030 $ (136,561) $ (25,060) $ (36,801) 18 $ 7,772 $ 142,776 $ 105,974 $ - $ (4,179) $ (34,766) 2031 $ (34,766) $ (25,060) $ (37,906) 9 $ 8,005 $ 73,530 $ 35,624 $ - $ (858) $ - Page 107 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Other Services Related to a Highway - Other Non -Residential Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Dev't Related Expenditures GFA per Year DC Rates w. Inflation (3%/Yr) Anticipated Revenues Revenues minus Expenditures Debenture Financing Requirement Interest (2.5% on positive balances & 5% on negative DC Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Financing Nominal Inflated (3%IYr) 2018 $ 26,955 $ (118474) $ (119,968) 1,118,519 $ 0.15 $ 168,812 $ 48844 $ (127,765) $ (962) $ (52,928) 2019 $ (52,928) $ (42,047) $ (44,608) 1,118,519 $ 0.16 $ 173,877 $ 129,269 $ (127,765) $ (2,609) $ (54,032) 2020 $ (54,032) $ 11,081) $ (99,527) 1,118,519 $ 0.16 $ 179,093 $ 79,566 $ (127,765) $ (3,907) $ (106,138) 2021 $ (106,138) $ (25,660) $ (28,881) 1,118,519 $ 0.16 $ 0.17 $ 184,466 $ 190,000 $ 155,585 $ (127,765) $ (4,611) $ (3,334) $ (82,929) $ (53,775) 2022 $ (82,929) $ (25,660) $ (29,748) 1,118,519 $ 160,252 $ (127,765) 2023 $ (53,775) $ (25,660) $ (30,640) 1,118,519 $ 0.17 $ 195,700 $ 165,060 $ (127,765) $ (1,756) $ (16,237) 2024 5 (18,237) $ (975,876) $ (1,200,205) $ (32,506) 1,118,519 1,118,519 $ 0.18 $ 0.19 $ 201,571 $ 207,618 $ (998,634) $ 175,112 $ (127,765) $ (127,765) $ (29,072) $ {57,502) $ (1,173,707) $ (1,183,861) 2025 5 (1,173,707) $ (25,660) 2026 $ (1,183,861) $ (25,660) $ (33,481) 1,118,519 $ 0.19 $ 213,847 $ 180,365 $ (127,765) $ (57,878) $ (1,189,139) 2027 $ (1,189,139) $ (25,660) $ (34,486) 1,118,519 $ 0.20 $ 220,262 $ 185,776 $ (127,765) $ (58,007) $ (1,189,134) 2028 $ (1,189,134) $ (51,705) $ (71,572) 2,160,212 $ 0.20 $ 438,157 $ 366,585 $ - $ (50,292) $ (872,8411 $ (529,460) 2029 $ (872,841) $ (51,705) $ (73,719) 2,160,212 $ 0.21 $ 451,302 $ 377,583 $ - $ (34,202) 2030 $ (529,460) $ (51,705) $ (75,931) 2,160,212 $ 0.22 $ 464,841 $ 388,910 $ - $ (16.750) $ 3,884 $ (157,301) $ 0 2031 $ 157,301 $ 51,705 $ 78,208 1,080,106 $ 0.22 $ 239,393 $ 161,184 $ - Page 108 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Parks & Recreation - Residential Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening° Balance Dev't Related Expenditures SDE per Year DC Rates w. ° inflation (3//Yr) Anticipated Revenues Revenues minus Expenditures Debenture Financing Requirement Interest (2.5% on positive balances & 554 on negative balances) DC Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Financing Nominal Inflated (3/°/Yr) 2018 $ 15,701,991 $ (4,131,662) $ (4,255,612) 2,499 $ 4,849 $ 12,117,308 $ 7,861,696 $ (438,576) $ 485,339 $ 23,610,450 2019 $ 23,510,450 $ (6,786,474) $ (7,199,770) 2,499 $ 4,995 $ 12480,827 $ 5,281,057 $ (438,576) $ 650,792 $ 29,103,723 2020 $ 29,103,723 $ (13,844,983) $ (15,128,786) 2,499 $ 5,145 $ 12,855,252 $ (2,273,534) $ (438,576) $ 693,692 $ 27,085,305 2021 $ 27,085,305 $ (24,208,732) $ (27,247,141) 2,499 $ 5,299 $ 13,240,910 $ (14,006,231) $ (438,576) $ 496,573 $ 13,137,070 $ (24,711,464) 2022 $ 13,137,070 $ (43,652,822) $ (50,605,585) 2,499 $ 5,458 $ 13,638,137 $ (36,967,448) $ (438,576) $ (442,510) 2023 $ (24,711,464) $ (4,728,317) $ (5,645,858) 2,155 $ 5,622 $ 12114,801 $ 6,468,944 $ (438,576) $ (1,084,814L $ (891,244) $ (19,765,911) $ (16,775,102) 2024 $ (19,765,911) $ (6,632,889) $ (8,157,617) 2,155 $ 5,791 $ 12,478,245 $ 4,320,629 $ (438,576) 2025 $ (16,775,102) $ (2,648,482) $ (3,355,018) 2,155 $ 5,964 $ 12,852,593 $ 9,497,575 $ (438,576) $ (438,576) $ (438,576 $ (612,280) $ (206,369) $ (1,46) $ (8,328,384) $ (59,111) $ 0 2026 $ (8,328,384) $ (3,313,950) $ (4,323,953) 2,155 $ 6,143 $ 13,238,171 $ 8,914,218 $ 499,146 2027 $ (59,111) $ (9,774,544) $ (13,136,159) 2,155 $ 6,327 $ 13,635,316 Page 109 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Parks and Recreation - Seaton Prestige Employment Land Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Dev't Related Expenditures Net Hectares per Year DC Rates w. Inflation (3%lYr) Anticipated Revenues Revenues minus Expend.#u res Debenture Financing Requirement Interest (2.5% on positive balances & 5% on negative balances} DC Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Financing Nominal Inflated (3° /Yr) 2018 $ 2,760 $ (77,991) $ (80,331) 18 $ 13,257 $ 243,536 $ 163,205 $ (8.279) $ 2,0061$ 159,692 + $ 159,692 $ (128,105) $ (135,906} 18 $ 13,655 6 250,842 $ 114,936 $ (8,279 $ 5,326 $ 271,674 2020 271,674 $ (261,345} $ (285,578) 18 $ 14,064 $ 258,367 $ (27,211) $ 8,279) $ 6,348 $ 242,532 2021 $ 242,532 $ (456,976) $ (514,330) 18 $ 14,486 $ 266,118 $ (248,212) $ (8,279) $ 2,683 $ (11,276) $ (824,012) $ (955,256) 18 $ 14,921 $ 274,102 $ (681,154) $ 175,751 $ (8,279) $ 8,279} $ (8,279) $ 8,279) $ (8,279) $ (17,800) $ (718,508) $ (31,739) $ (582,775) 2023 $ 18 $ (89,254) $ (106,574) 18 $ 15,368 $ 282,325 + $ (125,206) $ (153,987) 18 18 $ 15,830 $ 16,304 $ 290,795 $ 295,518 $ 136,807 $ 236,187 $ (25,926 $ (480,172) $ (18,311) $ (270,574) + 80 $ (49,994) $ (63,331) + 1 $ (62,556) $ (81,621) 10 $ 16,794 $ 308,504 $ 225,883 $ (8,064) $ (60,033) $ 0 2027 $ 60 184,509 $24( 7,965> 18 $ 17,297 $ 317,759 ` 69,794$ (8,279} $ 1.482) Page 110 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Parks & Recreation - Other Non -Residential Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Dev't Related Expenditures GFA per Year DC Rates w. ° Inflation (3/fl/Yr) Anticipated Revenues Revenues minus Expenditures Debenture Financing Requirement Interest (2.5% on positive balances & 5% on negative balances) DC Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Financing Nominal inflated (3 ° / /Yr) 2018 8 4,936 $ (139,465) $ (229,078) $ (143,649) $ (243,029) 1,118,519 1,118,519 $ 0.39 $ 0.40 $ 435,493 $ 448,558 $ 291,844 $ 205,529 $ (14,804) $ (14,834) $ 3,586 $ 9,523 $ 285,562 $ 485,810 2019 $ 285,562 2020 $ 485,810 $ 433,698 $ (467,339) $ (817,168) $ (510,674) $ (919,730) 1,118,519 1,118,519 $ 0.41 $ 0.43 $ 462,014 $ 475,875 $ (48,659) $ (443,855) $ (14,804) $ (14,804) $ 11,352 $ 4,797 $ 433,698 $ (20,163) 2021 2022 $ (20,163) $ (1,473,505) $ (1,708,196) 1,118,519 $ 0.44 $ 490,151 $ (1,218,045) $ (14,804) $ (31,829) $ (56,755) $ (46,360) $ (32,744) $ (14,419) $ (2,651) $ (1,284,842) $ (1,042,123) $ (858,647) $ (483.832) $ (107.352) $ (0) 2023 $ (1,284.842) $ (159,605) $ (190,576) $ (275,361) $ - (113,249) $ (145,955) $ (443,413) 1,118,619 $ 0.45 1,118,519 $ 0.46 1,118,519 $ 0.48 1,118,519 $ 0.49 1,118,519 $ 0.51 $ 504,856 $ 520,031 $ 535,601 $ 551,669 $ 568,219 $ 314,279 $ 244,640 $ 422,352 $ 405,714 $ 124,807 $ (14,804) $ (14,804) $ (14,804) $ (14,804) $ (14,804) 224 $ (1,042,123) $ (223,894) $ (89,400) $ (111,863) $ (329,941) 2025 $ (858,647) $ (483,842) $ (107,352) 2026 2027 Page 111 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Library - Residential Dev't Related Expenditures Interest Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening SDE per Year DC Rates w. Anticipated Revenues minus Debenture Financing (2.5% on positive DC Reserve Fund Closing Balance Nominal a Inflated (3 /o/Yr) o Inflation (3%/Yr) /Yr) Revenues Expenditures Requirement balances & 5% on negative balances Balance after Financing 2018 $ 2,658,843 $ (1,637,325) $ (1,885,445) 2,499 $ 1086 $ 2,713,615 $ 1,027,170 $ 79,311 $ 3765,323 2019 $ 3,765,323 $ (9,383.487) $ (9,954,941) 2,499 $ 1,119 $ 2,795,023 $ (7,159,918) $ (37,798) $ (3,432,393) 2020 $ (3,432,393) $ (6,634,335) $ (7,249,516) 2,499 $ 1,152 $ 2,878,874 $ (4,370,642) $ (280,886) 5 8,083,921) 2021 $ (8,083,921) $ (1,961,966) $ (2,208,209) 2,499 $ 1.187 $ 2,965,240 $ 757,031 $ (385,270) $ (7,712,161) 2022 $ (7,712,161) $ {3,441,288) $ (3,989,396) 2,499 $ 1,222 $ 3,054,197 $ (935,199) 5 (408,988) $ (9,056,347) 2023 $ {9,066,347) $ (3,165,919) $ (3,780,273) 2,155 $ 1,259 $ 2,713,054 $ (1,067,220) $ (479498) $ (10,603,065) 2024 $ (10603,065) $ - $ - 2,155 $ 1,297 $ 2794,445 $ 2,794.445 $ (460,292) $ (8,268,9( 2025 $ (8,268,912) $ $ 2,155 $ 1,336 $ 2,878,279 $ 2,878,279 $ (341,489) $ {5,732,122) 2026 $ (5,732,122) $ - $ - 2,155 $ 1,376 $ 2,964,627 $ 2,964,627 $ (212,493) $ (2,979,986) 2027 $ 2,979,986 $ $ - 2,155 $ 1,417 $ 3,053,566 $ 3,053,566 $ (73,580) 5 (0) Page 112 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Library - Seaton Prestige Employment Land Dev't Related Expenditures Interest D.C. Reserve Revenues Debenture (2.5% on DC Reserve Year Fund Opening Net Hectares DC Rates w. Anticipated minus Financing positive Fund Closing Balance Nominal o Inflated (3%/Yr) per Year Inflation (3%/Yr) Revenues Expenditures Requirement balances & 5% on negative ala rules) Balance after Financing 2018 $ 50,190 $ (30,907) $ (31,834) 18 $ 2,605 $. 47,861 $ 16027 $ 1,455 $ 67,671 2019 $ 67,671 $ (177,127) $ (187,914) 18 $ 2,683 $ 49,297 $ (138,618) $ (928) $ 171,674) 2020 $ {71,874) $ (125,233) $ (136,845) - 18 $ 2,764 $ 50,775 $ (86,070) $ (5,745) $ (163,690) 2021 $ (163,690) $ (37,035) $ (41,683) 18 $ 2,847 $ 52,299 $ 10,615 $ (7,919) $ (160,993} 2022 $ (160,993) $ (64959) $ (75,306) 18 $ 2,932 $ 53,868 $ (21,438) $ (8,586) $ (191,017) 2023 $ (191,017) $ (59,761) $ (71,358) 18 $ 3,020 $ 55,484 $ (15,875) $ (9,948) $ (216,839) 2024 $_21( 6839) $ - $ - 18 $ 3,111 $ 57,148 $ 57,148 $ (9,413) $ (169,105) 2025 $ (169,105) $ - $- 18 $ 3,204 $ 58,863 $ 58,863 $ (6,984) $ (117,226) 2026 $ (117,226) $ -$ - 18 $ 3,300 $ 60,629 $ 60,629 $ {4,346) $ (60,943) 2027 $ (60,943) $ - $ - 18 $ 3,399 $ 62,447 $ 62,447 $ (1,505) $ 0 Page 113 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Library - Other Non -Residential Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Dev't Related Expenditures GFA per Year DC Rates w. Inflation (3%/Yr) Anticipated Revenues Revenues minus Expenditures Debenture Financing Requirement Interest (2.5"/0 on positive balances & 5% on negative Asian oes) DC Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Financing Nominal Inflated (3%/Yr) 2018 $ 89,749 $ (55,268) $ (56,926) 1,118,519 $ 0.08 $ . 85,585 $ 28,659 $ 2,602 $ 121,010 2019 $ 121,010 $ (316,740) $ (336,030) 1,118,519 $ 0.08 $ 88,152 $ (247,877) $ (1,659) $ (128,52 $ (10,274) $ (292,711) $ (14,161) $ (287,890) 2020 $ (128,526) $ (223,943) $ (244,708) 1,118,519 $ 0 08 $ 90,797 $ (153,911) $ 18,983 2021 $ (292,711) $ (66,226) $ (74,538) 1,118,519 $ _ 0.08 $ 93;521 2022 $ (287,890) $ (116,161) $ (134,662) 1,118,519 $ 0.09 $ 96,327 $ (38,336) $ (15,353) $ (341,578) $ (387,754) $ (302,394) $ (209,624) 2023 $ (341,578) $ (106,866) $ (127,603( 1,118,519 $ 0.09 $ 99,216 $ (28,387) $ (17,789) 2024 $ (387,754) $ $ 1,118,519 $ 0.09 1,118,519 $ 0.09 $ 102,193 $ 105,259 $ 102,193 $ 105,259 $ (16,833) $ {12.488) 2025 $ (302,394) $ - $- 2026 $ (209,624) $ - $ - 1,118,519 $ 0.10 $ 0.10 $ 108,416 $ 111,669 $ 108,416 $ 111,669 $ (7,771 $ (108,978) $ (2,691) $ - 2027 $ 108,978 $ - $ - 1,118,519 Page 114 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Admin - Residential Year D.C. Reserve Fund OpeningSDE Balance Dev't Related Expenditures per Year DC Rates w. Inflation (3%/Yr) Anticipated Revenues Revenues minus Expenditures Debenture Financing Requirement Interest (2.5% on positive balances & 5% on negative balances) DC Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Financing Nominal Inflated (3%/Yr) 2018 2019 2020 $ (525,617) $ (848386) $ (845,272) $ (952,802) $ (630,097) $ (555,382) $ (463,220) $ (804,862) $ (981,386) 2,499 $ 277 $ 692,129 $ (289,257) $ (33,512) $ (848386) $ (668,470 2,499 $ 285 $ 712893 $ 44,423 $ (41,309) $ (845,272) $ (606,681) 2,499 $ 294 $ 734280 $ 127.399 $ (39,079) $ (31,974) $ (756,952) $ (553,976) 2021 $ (755,952) $ (521,358) $ (933,056) 2,499 2,499 $ 303_ $ 312 $ 756,308 $ 778,997 $ 234,950 $ (154,058) 2022 $ (553,976) $ (31,550) $ (739,584) 2023 $ (739,584) $ (310,448) $ 310,448) $ (310,448) $ (569,346) $ (370,691) $ (381,812) 2,155 2,155 2,155 2,155 $ 321 $ 691,986 $ 321,295 $ (28,947) $ (447,236 2024 $ 447,236) $ 331 $ 341 $ 712,746 $ 734,128 $ 330,933. $ 340,861 $ (14,088) $ - (629) $ (130,391 $ 209,841 2025 2026 $ (130,391) $ 209,841 $ (393,266) $ (742,667) $ 351 $ 756,152 $ 13,285 $ 5,412 $ 228,538 2027 $ 228,538 $ 751,655 $ 1,010,161 2,155 $ 361 $ 778,836 $ (231,325 $ 2,787 $ 0 Page 115 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Admin - Seaton Prestige Employment Land Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Dev t Related Expenditures Net Hectares per Year DC Rates w. ° Inflation (3 /Yr) Anticipated Revenues Revenues minus Expenditures Debenture Financing Requirement Interest (2.5% on positive balances & 5% on negative balances) DC Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Financing Nominal ° Inflated (3 /Yr) 2018 $ (53,171) $ (96,384) $ (99,276) 18 $ 3,560 $ 65,396 $ (33,879) $ (3,506) $ (90,555) $ (95,353) $ (91,933) $ (77,341) 2019 $ (90,555) $ (63,740) $ (67,622) $ - (61,391) $ (52,740) 18 18 18 $ 3,667 $ 3,777 $ 3,890 $ 67,358 $ 69,379 $ 71,461 $ (263) $ 7,988 .9 18,721 $ (4,534) $ (4,568) $ (4,129) 2020 $ (95,353) $ (91,933) $ (56,182) $ (46,859) 2021 $ (77,341) $ (81,419) $ (31,405) $ (94,387) $ (37,499) 18 18 $ 4,007 $ 4,127 $ 73,604 $ 75,812 $ (20,782) $ 38,314 $ (4,387) $ (4,168) $ (102,510) $ (68,363) _2022 2023 $ (102,510) 2024 $ (68,363) $ (31,332) $ 8,648 $ (31,405) $ (31,405) $ (57,594) $ (76035) $ (38,624) $ (39,782) $ (75,147) $ (102,186) 18 18 18 18 $ 4,251 $ 4,378 $ 4,510 $ 4,645 $ 78,087 $ 80,429 $ 82,842 $ 85,328 $ 39,463 $ 40,647 $ 7,695 $ (16,859) $ (2,432) $ [667) $ 312 $ 203 $ (31,332) $ 8,648 $ 16,656 $ - 2025 2026 2027 $ 16656 Page 116 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Admin - Other Non -Residential Dev't Related Expenditures Interest D.C. Reserve Revenues Debenture (2.5% on DC Reserve Year Fund Openingo GFA per Year DC Rates w. Anticipated minus Financing positive Fund Closing Balance Nominal Inflated (3%/Yr) Inflation (3%/Yr) Revenues Expenditures Requirement balances & 5% on negative Balance after Financing .. . f - 2015 3 95,080) $ (172,355) $ (177,526) 1,118,519 $ 0.10 $ 116,943 $ (00,583) $ (6,269) $ (161,932) 2019 $ (161,932) $ (113,980) $ 120,921) 1,118,519 $ 0.11 $ 120,451 $ (471) $ 8,108 $ (170,511) 2020 $ (170,511) $ (100,465) $ (109,780) 1,118,519 $ 0.11 $ 124,064 $ 14,284 $ (8,16 $ (164,395) 2021 $ (164,395) $ (83,723) $ (94,310) 1,118,519 $ 0.11 $ 127,786 $ 33,476 $ (7,383) $ (138,301) 2022 $ (138,301) $ (145,594) $ (168,783) 1,118,519 $ 0,12 $ 131,620 $ (37,163) . $ (7,844) $ (183,309) 2023 $ (183,309) $ (56,158) $ (67,055) 1,118,519 $ 0.12 $ 135,568 $ 68,513 $ (7,453) 3 (122,248) 2024 $ (122,248) $ (58,158) $ (69,067) 1,118,519 $ 0.12 $ 139636 $ 70,569 $ (4,348) $ (56,028) 2025 $ (56,028) $ (56,158) $ (71,139) 1,118,519 $ 0.13 $ 143,825 $ 72,686 $ (1,192) $ 15,465 2026 6 15,465 $ (102,990) $ (134,379) 1,118,519 $ 0.13 $ 148,139 $ 13,760 $ 559 $ 29,784 2027_ $ 29,784 $ (135,969) $_(182,731)__ 1,118,519 $ 0.14 $ 152,584 $ {30,147) $ 363 $ 0 Page 117 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Stormwater Management - Residential Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Dev't Rola ed Expenditures SDE per Year DC Rates w. Inflation (3%/Yr) Anticipated Revenues Revenues minus Expenditures Debenture Financing Requirement Interest (2.5% on positive balances & 5% on negative DC Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Financing Nominal Inflated (3%/Yr) 2018 $ 722,514 $ (608,310) $ (626,559) 2,499 $ 288 $ 719,883 $ 93,324 $ 19,229 $ 835,068 2019 $ 835,068 $ (608,310) $ (645,356) 2,499 $ 297 $ 741,480 $ 96,124 $ 22,078 $ 953,271 2020 $ 953,271 $ (608,310) $ (664,716) 2,499 $ 305 $ 753,724 $ 99,008 $ 25,069 $ 1,077,348 2021 $ 1,077,348 8_... (628,310) $ (684,658) 2,499 $ 315 $ 786,636 $ 101,978 $ 28,208 $ 1,207,534 2022 $ 1,207,534 $ (608,310) $ (705,198) 2,499 $ 324 $ 810,235 $ 105,037 $ 31,501 $ 1,344,373 2023 $ 1,344,073 $ (608,310) $ (726,353 2,155 $ 334 $ 719,734 $ (6,619) $ 33,519 $ 1,370,973 2024 $ 1,370,973 $ (608,310) $ (745,144) 2,155 $ 344 $ 741,326 $ (6,818) $ 34,189 $ 1,398,344 2025 $ 1,398,344 $ (540,471) $ (684,652). 2,155 $ 354 $ 763,566 $ 78,914 $ 35,945 $ 1,513,204 2026 $ 1,513,204 $ {540,471) $ (705,192) 2,155 $ 365 $ 786,473 $ 81,282 $ 38,846 $ 1,633,331 2027 $ 1,633,331 $ (540,471) $ (726,347) 2,155 $ 376 $ 810,067 $ 83,720 $ 41,880 $ 1,758,931 2028 $ 1758931 $ (5404718 (748,138) 905 $ 387 $ 350,356 $ (397,781), $ 39,001 $ 1,400,151 2029 $ _ 1,400,151 $ {540,471) $ (770,582) 905 $ 399 $ 350,867 $ (409,715) $ 29,882 $ 1,020,318 2030 $ 1,020,318 $ (540,471) $ (793,699) 905 $ 411 $ 371,693 $ (422,006) $ 20,233 8 618,545 2031 $ 618,545 $ (540,471) $ (817,510) 452 $ 423 $ 191,422 $ (626,088) $ 7,543 $ - Page 118 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Stormwater Management -Seaton Prestige Employment Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Devi Related Expenditures Net Hectares per Year DC Rates w. Inflation (3 /°IYr} Anticipated Revenues Revenues minus Expenditures Debenture Financing Requirement Interest (2.5% on positive balances & 5% on negative balances) DC Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Financing Nominal ° Inflated (3/-0IYr} 2018 $ 82,872 $ (69,773) $ (71,866) 18 $ 3503 $ 64,358 $ (7,508) $ 1,978 $ 77,342 2019 $ 77,342 $ (69,773 $ (74,022) 15 $ 3,608 5 66,288 $ (7,733) _ $ 1,837 $ 71.445 2020 $ 71,445 $ 69,773) $ (76,242 18 $ 3,717 $ 68,277 $ 7,965) $ 1,687 $ 65,166 2021 $ 55,166 $ (69,773) $ (78,530) $ 80,885) 18 18 $ $ 3,828 3,943 $ $ 70,325 $ {8,204) $ 1,527 $ 58,489 2022 $ 58,489 $ (69,773) 72.435 $ (8,450) $ (8,704) $ $ 1,357 1,176 $ 51,395 $ 43,867 2023 $ 51,395 $ (69,773) $ (83,312) 18 $ 4,061 $ 74,608 2025 $ 35,887 $ (69,773) $ (61,991) $ $ (78,51) (78,529) $ $ 4,109 4,309 $ $ 76,846 79,1152 $ (8,623) $ 623 $ $ 985 905 $ 35,887 $ 37,4115 2025 $ 35,887 2026 $ 37,415 $ (61,991) $ (80,885) $ 4,438 $ 81,526 $ 642 $ 943 $ 39,000 2027 $ 39,000 $ (61,991) $ (83,311) 18 $ 4,571 $ 83,972 $ 661 $ 983 $ 40,644 2028 $ 40,644 $ (61,991 $ (85,811) 18 $ 4,708 $ 86,491 $ 681 $ 1,025 $ 42,349 2029 $ 42,349 $ (61,991) $ (88,385) 18 $ 4,849 $ 89,086 $ 701 $ 1,067 $ 44,118 2030 $ 44,118 $ (61,991) $ (91,037) 18 $ 4,995 $ _ 91,759 $ 722 $ 1,112 $ 45,952 2031 $ 45,952 $ 61,991 $ 93,768 9 $ 5,145 $ 47,256 $ 46,512 $ 560 $ 0 Page 119 City of Pickering - 2017 Development Charges Background Study Cash Flow Analysis Stormwater Management - Other Non -Residential Year D.C. Reserve Fund Opening Balance Dev't Related Expenditures GFA per Year DC Rates w. Inflation (3%!Yr) Anticipated Revenues Revenues minus Expenditures Debenture Financing Requirement Interest (2.5% on positive balances & 5% on negative DC Reserve Fund Closing Balance after Financing Nominal a Inflated (3%/Yr) 2018 $ 170,985 $ {143,958) $ (148,277) 1,118,519 $ 0.10 $ 107,747 $ (40,530) $ 3,768 $ 134,223 2019 $ 134,223 $ (143,958) $ (152725) 1,118,519 $ 0.10 $ 110,979 $ (41,746) $ 2,834 $ 95,311 2020 $ 95,311 $ (143 958 $ (157,307 1,118,519 $ 0.10 $ 114,308 $ (42,998) $ 1,845 $ 54,155 2021 _ $ 54,158 $ (143,958) $ (152,026) 1,118,519 $ D.11 $ 117,738 $ (44,288) $ 800 $ 10,670 2022 $ 10,670 $ (143,958) $ (156,887) 1,118,519 $ D.11 $ 121,270 $ (45,617) $ (740) $ (35,687) 2023 $ (35,687) $ (143,958) $ {171,893) 1,118,519 $ D.11 $ 124,908 $ (46,985) $ (2.959) $ (85,631) 2024 $ (85,631) $ (143,958) $ (177,050) 1,118,519 $ 0.12 $ _ 128,555 $ (48,395) $ {5,491) $ (139,518) 2025 $ (139,518) $ (127,904) $ (162,025). 1,118,519 $ 0,12 $ 132,515 $ (29,510) $ (7,714) $ (176,741) 2026 $ (176,741) $ (127,904) $ (166,885) 1,118,519 $ 0.12 $ 136,490 $ (30,395) $ (9,597) $ (216,733) 2027 $ (216,733) $ (127,934) $ (171,892) 1,118,519 $ 0.13 $ 140,585 $ (31,307) $ (11,519) $ (259,659) 2028 $ (259,659) $ (127,904) $ (177,049) 2.160,212 $ 0.13 $ 279,659 $ 102,611 _ $ (10,418) $ (167,466) 2029 $ (167,466) $ (127,904) $ (182,360) 2,160,212 $ 0.13 $ 288,049 $ 105,689 $ (5,731) $ (67,509) 2030 $ (67,509). $ (127,904) $ (187,831) 2,160,212 $ 0.14 $ 296,590 $ 108,860 $ (1.171) $ 40,180 203' $ 40,180 $ (127,904) $ (193,466) 1,080,106 $ 0,14 $ 152,796 $ (40,670) $ 490 $ (0) Page 120 Appendix D - Long-term Capital and Operating Cost Examination Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Pickering\2017 DC StudylReport\Pickering DC Background Study -Final. docx Page 121 Appendix D v Long-term Capital and Operating Cost Examination As a requirement of the D.C.A., 1997 under subsection 10(2)(c), an analysis must be undertaken to assess the long-term capital and operating cost impacts for the capital infrastructure projects identified within the D.C. As part of this analysis, it was deemed necessary to isolate the incremental operating expenditures directly associated with these capital projects, factor in cost savings attributable to economies of scale or cost sharing where applicable, and prorate the cost on a per unit basis (i.e. square foot of building space, per vehicle, etc.). This was undertaken through a review of the City's 2016 Financial Information Return. In addition to the operational impacts, over time the initial capital projects will require replacement. This replacement of capital is often referred to as lifecycle cost. By definition, lifecycle costs are all the costs which are incurred during the life of a physical asset, from the time its acquisition is first considered, to the time it is taken out of service for disposal or redeployment. The method selected for lifecycle costing is the sinking fund method which provides that money will be contributed annually and invested, so that those funds will grow over time to equal the amount required for future replacement. The following factors samples of what were utilized to calculate the annual replacement cost of the capital projects (annual contribution = factor x capital asset cost) and are based on an annual growth rate of -1 % (net of inflation) over the average useful life of the asset: Asset Lifecycle Cost: Average Useful Life (Years) Lifecycle Cost: Factor Facilities, Buildings 40 0.02759 Roads and Related 20 0.05531 Rolling Stock and Equipment 10 0.10547 Fire Vehicles 15 0.07201 Infrastructure 40 0.03034 Parks Related 30 0.03864 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:IPickering12017 DC StudylReport\Pickering DC Background Study-FinaLdocx Page 122 Table D-1 depicts the annual operating impact resulting from the proposed gross capital projects at the time they are all in place. It is important to note that, while municipal program expenditures will increase with growth in population, the costs associated with the new infrastructure (Le. facilities) would be delayed until the time these works are in place. Table D-1 Operating and Capital Expenditure Impacts for Future Capital Expenditures SERVICE ANNUAL LIFECYCLE EXPENDITURES ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES 1. Transportation 3,597,036 819,501 4,416,538 2. Stormwater Management 329,725 398,784 728,509 3. Other Services Related to a Highway 646,471 2,185,977 2,832,448 4. Protection Seruces 1,010,992 16,530,129 17,541,121 5. Parks and Recreation Services 5,218,687 7,965,692 13,184,379 6. Library Services 976,115 5,737,381 6,713,496 7. Administration Studies - Total 11,779,027 33,637,465 45,416,492 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H.IPickenng12O17 DC Study\Report\Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 123 Appendix E — Proposed D.C. By-law Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:4Prckering12017 DC Study\Report4Pickering DC Background Study-Final.docx Page 124 The Corporation of the City of Pickering By-law No, 117 Being a By-law Regarding Development Charges Whereas, pursuant to subsection 2(1) of the Development Charges Act, 1997 (the Act), the council of a municipality may by by-law impose development charges against land to pay for increased capital costs required due to increased needs for servicing arising from development of the area to which the By-law applies; and Whereas, the Council of The Corporation of the City of. Pickering approved the City of Pickering Development Charge Background Study, dated October 5, 2017, as amended, prepared by Watson &Associates Economists Ltd.; And Whereas the Council has made the Background Study and proposed Development Charges By-law available to the public at least sixty days prior to by-law passage and two weeks prior to the public meeting and has given notice in accordance with Section 12 of the Act of its development charges proposal and a public meeting was held on November 6, 2017 And Whereas the Council has heard ail persons who applied to be heard in objection to, or in support of, the proposed Development Charge By-law at such public meeting, and provided a subsequent period for written communications to be made; And Whereas the Council in adopting the Development Charge Background Study directed that development charges be imposed on land under development or redevelopment within the geographical limits of the municipality as hereinafter provided. Now therefore the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as follows: Part I Application 1. (1) Subject to subsection (2), this By-law applies to all lands whether or not the land or use is exempt from taxation under Section 3 of the Assessment Act. (2) This By-law shall not apply to land that is owned by and used for the purposes of, (a) a board of education as defined under subsection 1(1) of the Education Act; (b) any municipality or local board thereof; (c) the development of a non-residential farm building used for bona fide agricultural purposes; (i) Notwithstanding subsection 2(c) the exemption will not apply to the development charges calculated with respect to Transportation Services, Protection Services, and Other Services Related to a Highway; (3) Page 125 (d) a building or structure that is used in connection with a place of worship and is exempt from taxation under the Assessment Act as a result; (e) development where: (i) (ii) no additional dwelling units are being created; or no additional non-residential gross floor area is being added; or (f) nursing homes and hospitals. An owner who has obtained a demolition permit and demolished an existing dwelling unit or a non-residential building in accordance with the provisions .of the Building. Code Act shall not be subject to the development charge under subsection (1) with respect to the development- being replaced, provided that: (a) the building permit for the replacement residential units or non- residential area is issued not more than 5 years after the date of demolition; and (b) that the applicant has provided proof that the building being demolished was subject to, and paid a development charges under a prior by-law or a lot levy under by-law 3322/89; and (c ) that any dwelling units or additional non-residential floor area created in excess of what was demolished shall be subject to the development charge calculated under Section 6 and 11, respectively. (d) notwithstanding subsection 3(a), for building permit issuance occurring between January 1, 2018 and June 29, 2018 demolition must have occurred no more than 10 years prior to be eligible for the redevelopment credit. 2. (1) Subject to subsection (2), development charges shall apply, and shall be calculated, paid and collected in accordance with the provisions of this By- law, in respect of land to be developed for residential use, non-residential use, or both where the development requires, (a) the passing of a zoning by-law or of an amendment to a zoning by- law under Section 34 of the Planning Act; (b) the approval of a minor variance under Section 45 of the Planning Act; (c) a conveyance of land to which a by-law passed under subsection 50(7) of the Planning Act applies; (d) the approval of a plan of subdivision under Section 51 of the Planning Act; (e) a consent under Section 53 of the Planning Act; Page 126 the approval of a description under Section 50 of the Condominium Act; or the issuing of a permit under the Building Code Act, in relation to a building or structure. (2) Subsection (1) shall not apply in respect of: (a) local services, related to a plan of subdivision or within the area to which the plan relates, to be installed or paid for by the owner as a condition of approval under Section 51 of the Planning Act; (b) local services to be installed or paid for by the owner as a condition of approval under Section 53 of the Planning Act. 3. (1) Where two or more of the actions• described in subsection 2(1) are required before land to. Which a development charge applies can be developed, only one development charge shall be calculated, paid and collected in accordance with the provisions of this By-law. (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), more than one development charge by- law may apply to the same area and if two or more of the actions described in subsection 2(1) occur at different times, and if the subsequent action has the effect of increasing the need for services as designated in Sections 5 and 10,an additional development charge shall be calculated, paid and collected in accordance with the provisions of this By-law. 4. In this Part, (a) Part II Residential Development Charges "apartment building" means a residential building or the residential portion of a mixed-use building consisting of more than 3 dwelling units, which dwelling units have a common entrance to grade, but does not include a triplex, semi-detached duplex, semi-detached triplex, townhouse or stacked townhouse; (b) "apartment" means a dwelling unit in an apartment building; (c) "bedroom" means any room used, or designed or intended for use, as sleeping quarters; (d) "development charge" means residential development charge; (e) "dwelling unit" means a room or suite of rooms used, or designed or intended for use by one person or persons living together, in which culinary and sanitary facilities are provided for the exclusive use of such person or persons; (f) "garden suite" means a one -unit detached, temporary residential structure containing bathroom and kitchen facilities that is ancillary for an existing residential structure and that is designed to be portable; (g) "grade" means the average level of finished ground adjoining a dwelling at all exterior walls; Page 127 (h) "gross floor area" means the total floor area, measured between the outside of exterior walls or between the outside of exterior walls and the centre line of party walls dividing the building from another building, of all floors above the average level of finished ground adjoining the building at its exterior walls; (i) "hospital" means land, buildings or structures used, or designed or intended for use as defined in the Public Hospitals Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.40 as amended; (j) "Live Work unit" is as defined in the City's zoning by-laws; (k) "nursing home" means a building owned and operated on a non-profit basis but excluding any building or part of a building which is comprised of dwelling units; (1) (m) "residential use" means lands, buildings or structures used, or designed or intended for use as a home or residence of one or more individuals, and shall include, but is not limited to, a single detached dwelling, a semi- detached dwelling, a townhouse, a plex, a stacked townhouse, an apartment building, a mobile home, a retirement residence and a residential dwelling unit accessory to a non-residential use; "retirement residence" means a residential building or the residential portion of a mixed-use building which provides accommodation for persons of retirement age, where common facilities for the preparation And consumption of food are provided for the residents of the building, and where each unit or living accommodation has separate sanitary facilities, less than full culinary facilities and a separate entrance from a common hall; (n) "retirement residence unit" means a unit within a retirement residence; (o) "semi-detached dwelling" means one pf a pair of dwelling units attached together horizontally above or below grade or both above and below grade; (p) "single -attached dwelling" means one of a group of not less than three adjacent dwelling units attached together horizontally by above grade common walls; (q) "single -detached dwelling" means a single dwelling unit which is free- standing, separate and detached from any other building or structure. 5. Development charges against land to be developed for residential use shall be based upon the services designated in Schedule "A", which are provided by the City. 6. (1) Subject to the provisions of this Part, development charges against land to be developed for residential use shall be calculated, paid and collected at the rates per residential unit set out in Schedule "C"; (2) Residential development located within Seaton lands, as shown in Schedule B, is subject to the Seaton Transportation funding arrangement and not to the Transportation charge applicable to development in the rest of Pickering; Page 128 (3) The development charges imposed on a retirement residence unit under subsection (1) shall be payable at the rate applicable to an apartment of one bedroom and smaller; (4) Development charges against land to be developed for a Live Work unit shall be subject to the -residential rates. 7. (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), Section 6 shall not apply in respect of a renovation, addition or installation which involves the creation of: (a) one or two additional dwelling units in an existing single -detached dwelling; (b) an additional dwelling unit in any other existing residential building; or (c) garden suites. (2) Notwithstanding clause (1)(a) of this Section, development charges shall be calculated, paid and collected in accordance with Section 6 where the total gross floor area of the additional unit or units is greater than the total gross floor 1;lrea of the existing dwelling unit. (3) Notwithstanding clause {1 )(b) of this Section, development charges shall be calculated, paid and collected in accordance with Section 6 where the additional unit has a gross floor area greater than, (a) in the case of a semi-detached dwelling or single attached dwelling, the gross floor area of the dwelling unit already in the building; or (b) in the case of any other residential building; the gross floor area of the smallest dwelling unit contained in the residential building. 8. (1) Where non-residential floor area is to be converted to residential space, a charge shall be paid for any new residential units created, Tess the amount of the charge which would be payable if the existing non-residential space being converted were being constructed, but in no case shall the net charge be less than zero. (2) Notwithstanding subsection 8(1), development charge credits for the conversion of an existing building from one principal use to another will only be provided where the applicant has provided proof of payment of a development charges under a previous by-law or a lot levy under by-law 3322/89 with regard to the building to be converted. Part III Non -Residential Development Charges 9. In this Part, (a) "agricultural use" means lands, buildings or structures, excluding any portion thereof used as a dwelling unit or for a commercial use, used or designed or intended for use for the purpose of a bona fide farrning• operation including, but not limited to, animal husbandry, dairying, livestock, fallow, field crops, removal of sod, forestry, fruit farming, greenhouses, horticulture, market gardening, pasturage, poultry keeping, and equestrian facilities; Page 129 (b) "development charge" means non-residential development charge; (c) "grade" means the average level of finished ground adjoining a building at all exterior walls; (d) "existing industrial building" means a building used for or in connection with: (i) manufacturing, producing, processing, storing or distributing something; (ii) research or development in connection with manufacturing, producing or processing something; (iii) retail sales by a manufacturer, producer or processor of something they manufactured, produced or processed, if the retail sales are at the site where the manufacturing, production or processing takes place; or (iv) office or administrative purposes, if they are: (1) carried out with respect to manufacturing, producing, processing, storage or distributing or something, and In or attached to the building or structure used for that manufacturing, producing, processing, storage or distribution; (2) in or attached to the building or structure used for that manufacturing, producing, processing, storage or distribution; (e) "gross floor area" means the total floor area, measured between the outside of exterior walls or between the outside of exterior walls and the centre line of party walls dividing the building from another building, of all floors above the average level of finished ground adjoining the building at its exterior walls; (f) (g) "net hectare" means the area in hectares of a parcel of land exclusive of the following: (1) lands conveyed or to be conveyed to the City of Pickering or a local board thereof or the Region or a local board thereof; (ii) lands conveyed or to be conveyed to the Ministry of Transportation for the construction of provincial highways; (iii) hazard lands conveyed or to be conveyed to a conservation authority as a condition of development; (iv) lands identified as "Natural Heritage System" pursuant to the Central Pickering Development Plan; and (v) storm water management facility areas; "non-residential" means designed, adapted or used for any purpose other than a dwelling unit or dwelling units, or accessory uses or spaces to a dwelling or dwellings; Page 130 (h) "total floor area" means the sum total of the areas of the floor whether above or below grade, measured between the exterior faces of the exterior walls of the building or structure or frorn the centre line of a common wall separating two uses; and (1) includes the area of mezzanine as defined in the Ontario Building Code; and (ii) excludes those areas used exclusively as mechanical areas or for parking garages or structures. 10. Development charges against land to be developed for non-residential use shall be based upon the services designated in Schedule "A", which are provided by the City. 11. (1) Subject to the provisions of this Part, development charges against land to be developed for non-residential use shall be calculated, paid and collected at the rates set out in Schedule "C": (2) Non-residential development located within Seaton Lands in Schedule B is subject to the Seaton Transportation funding arrangement and not to the Transportation charge applicable to development in the rest of Pickering. Further, non-residential development located within the Seaton Prestige Employment Lands is subject to the charge per net hectare set out in Schedule "C"; (3) The development charges in subsection 11(2) shall be calculated based on the number of net hectares of the entire parcel of land on which development will occur. (4) If a development includes the enlargement of the gross floor area of an existing industrial building, the amount of the development charge that is payable In respect of the enlargement will be determined as follows: (a) if the gross floor area is enlarged by 50 percent or less, the amount of the development charge in respect of the enlargement is zero; and (b) if the gross floor area is enlarged by more than 50 percent, the amount of the development charge in respect of the enlargement is the amount of the development charge that would otherwise be payable multiplied by the fraction determined as follows: (c) (i) determine the amount by which the enlargement in gross floor area exceeds 50 percent of the gross floor area lawfully constructed at the time of building permit application; and (ii) divide the amount determined under paragraph (1) by the amount of the enlargement. for the purposes of calculating the floor area of the existing industrial building, floor area created by a previous enlargement shall not be included. 12. (1) Where residential floor area is to be converted to non-residential floor area, a charge shall be paid for any new non-residential space created, less the amount of the charge which would be payable if the existing residential units Page 131 being converted were being constructed, but in no case shall the net charge be less than zero. (2) Notwithstanding subsection 12(1), development charge credits for the conversion of an existing building from one principal use to another will only be provided where the applicant has provided proof of payment of a development charge under a prior by-law or a lot levy under by-law 3322/89 with regard to the building to be converted. Part IV Administration 13. Development charges against land to be developed for residential uses, non- residential uses, or both, shall be calculated, paid and collected as follows: (a) development charges agains.t that portion of the land to be developed for residential use shall be calculated, paid and collected on a per dwelling unit of residential use basis in accordance with Part Il and Schedule "C" of this By-law and in the case of a mixed-use building or structure, upon the residential uses in the mixed use buildings or structures, according to the type of residential use; (b) development charge against that portion of the land to be developed for non-residential use shall be calculated, paid and collected in accordance with Part 111 and Schedule "C" of this By-law and in the case of a mixed- use building or structure, upon the non-residential uses in the mixed-use building or structure. 14. (1) Development charges shall be payable in full on the date that the building permit is issued in relation to a building or structure on land to which a development charge applies. (2) No building permits shall be issued by the City for the construction of any building or structure on land to which a development charge applies until the applicable development charge has been paid in full to the City. (3) Where an owner has paid to the City, prior to the enactment of this By-law, in relation to a building or structure on land to which a development charge applies, (a) a charge against development pursuant to an obligation to do so in a subdivision agreement, condominium agreement, development agreement or other agreement with the City; (b) a fee as a condition of obtaining a consent to create a lot, other than the application fee; or (c) a lot levy pursuant to By-law 3322/89, and the building permit for that building or structure has not been issued prior to the enactment of this By-law, the owner shall be credited with the amount so paid, up to the amount of the development charge payable, as part of the development charge payable hereunder when the building permit is issued. Page 132 15. (1) Monies received from payment of development charges shall be maintained in a separate reserve fund for each service designated in Schedule "A", plus interest earned thereon. (2) Monies received for the payment of development charges shall be used only in accordance with the provisions of s.35 of the Act. (3) The amounts contained in the reserve funds established under this Section shall be invested, with any income received credited to the development charge reserve funds in relation to which the investment income applies. 16. (1) The development charges referred to in Sections 6 and 11 apply to all permit applications received on or after January 1, 2018. These rates shall be adjusted annually, without amendment to this By-law, as of July 1 each year, commencing in 2019, in accordance with the change in the index for the most recently available annual period ending March 31 for the Statistics Canada Quarterly, Construction Price Statistics, Catalogue Number 62-007. (2) The indexed development charges rates effective July 1 each year shall not apply to permit applications received prior to the July 1 effective date, provided: (i) the permit application is complete in terms of the applicant's submission requirements set out in the building code and the City's Building By-law; (!i) applicable law approvals prescribed in the building code have been obtained or applied for; and (iii) the building permit or a conditional building permit is issued for all or part of the building on or before July 15 of that year. 17. Development charges are payable by cash or certified cheque at the applicable rates or as otherwise may be approved by Council. 18. Council may consider allowing a person to perform work that relates to a service to which this By-law relates and if it agrees shall give the person a credit towards a development charge otherwise payable in exchange for the related Work. 19. This By-law shall be administered by the Corporate Services Department and applied by the Chief Building Official. 20. The following schedules to this by-law form an integral part of this by-law: Schedule "A" - Designated Municipal Services Under this By-law. Schedule "B" - City of Pickering and Seaton Lands. Schedule "C" - Schedule of Development Charges Effective January 1, 2018. 21. This By-law shall come into force and effect at 12:01 am on January 1, 2018 for a term not to exceed five years from the date it comes into force, unless it is repealed at an earlier date. 22. By-law No. 7324/13 shall be repealed as of the date this By-law comes into force. By-law passed this 11th day of December, 2017. Page 133 Mayor City Clerk Page 134 Schedule "A" Designated Municipal Services Under this By-law (a) Transportation Services, including roads, structures, sidewalks, streetlights, traffic signals and services related thereto; (b) Other Services Related to a Highway, including facilities, vehicles and equipment; (c) Protection Services, including facilities, vehicles, equipment and services related thereto; (d) Parks and Recreation Services, including parkland development, trail development, facilities, vehicles, equipment and services related thereto; (e) Library Services, including facilities, furnishings, equipment and services related thereto, including circulating and non -circulating materials generally provided to library users by public libraries; (f) Administration, including development -related capital studies and services related thereto; (g) Stormwater Management, including storm drainage and management works, equipment and services related thereto. { Page 135 Schedule "B" City of Pickering and SePin Lands ? = \ / . \ \ \ \ 2 \�k�\ \ ® * d \ p « \ \j , 77. J Page 136 Schedule "C" City of Pickering Schedule of Development Charges Effective January 1, 2018 Service RESIDENTIAL NON-RESIDENTIAL Single and Semi -Apartments Detached+ Dwelling - 2 Bedrooms Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom Other Multiples (per ftz of Total Floor Area) (per net Ha of Prestige Employment Land in Seaton) Municipal Wide Services: Other Services Related to a Highway 441 279 197 356 0.15 5,451 Protection Services 889 562 398 718 0.34 11,431 Parks and Recreation Services 4,851 3,065 2,171 3,917 0.39 13,261 Library Services 1,086 686 486 877 0.08 2,605 Administration Studies 277 175 124 224 0.10 3,560 Stormwater Management 288 182 129 233 0.10 3,503 Total Municipal Wide Services 7,832 4,949 3,505 6,325 1.15 39,812 Outside of Seaton Lands Transportation 1 6,517 4,117 2,917 5,261 1.83 Total Services Outside of Seaton Lands 6,517 4,117 2,917 5,261 1.83 Seaton 7,832 4,949 3,505 6,325 1.15 39,812 Rest of Pickering 14,349 9,066 6,422 11,586 2.98 1. Subject to a separate agreement outside of the Development Charges Act concerning the provision of Transportation requirements in addition to other funding contributions 2. Does not apply to prestige employment development in Seaton, as that development is subject to the per net Ha land area charge instead. Page 137 Appendix F - Local Service Policy Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. N:4Pickerng12017 DC Study4Report4Pickering DC Background Study -Final. docx Page 138 Appendix F - Draft Local Service Policy This Appendix sets out the City's General Policy Guidelines on Development Charges (D.C.) and local service funding for Services Related to a Highway, Stormwater Management, and Parkland Development. The guidelines outline, in general terms, the size and nature of engineered infrastructure that is included in the study as a D.C. project, versus infrastructure that is considered as a local service, to be emplaced separately by landowners, pursuant to a development agreement. The following policy guidelines are general principles by which staff will be guided in considering development applications. However, each application will be considered, in the context of these policy guidelines as subsection 59(2) of the Development Charges Act, 1997, as amended (D.C.A.) on its own merits having regard to, among other factors, the nature, type and location of the development and any existing and proposed development in the surrounding area, as well as the location and type of services required and their relationship to the proposed development and to existing and proposed development in the area. A. SERVICES RELATED TO A HIGHWAY Roads: Development will be required to provide local services including roadworks, sidewalks, walkways, local storm sewers, streetlights, structures, utilities and other items identified in a subdivision or development agreement, for all roads, and/or lanes a) within the plan of subdivision, b) existing, that have lots fronting onto it, c) adjacent to the plan of subdivisions but not separated by a reserve, and required to provide access from the development to an open and maintained road. The reserve will only be required where the municipality requires restricted access. Traffic Control: Development will be required to provide all traffic control measures (including fencing, line painting, pedestrian signals, and tactile warning surfaces) identified through the approval process on roads a) within the plan of subdivision, and b) adjacent to the plan of subdivision or c) intersecting the plan of subdivision. Should the development be of a large enough scale to be required to install a signalized intersection, identified through the approval process, the City will supplement the cost only if the signalized intersection is one identified in the by-law. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:1Pickenng12017 DC StudylReportlPickerng DC Background Study-Final.docx Pagel39 B. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The following guidelines are used to identify Stormwater Management Facilities internal to development: a) the conveyance system within creeks internal to a development whereby local benefit is apparent or re -alignment is necessary for the development of adjacent lands; b) a share of the cost of culverts based on the local benefits derived; c) all stormwater management facilities, outfalls and localized creek or channel improvements related to a development plan will be cost -shared among all landowners within the planning area through Developer Cost -Sharing Agreements; and d) any stormwater quality and quantity control measures required to mitigate impacts of development (i.e. SWM ponds, superpipes, oil -grit separators, low impact development measures (LIDs), such as bioswales, rain gardens, infiltration trenches, rain barrels, offsite plantings etc.). All minor/local stormwater management facilities internal to a development (including storm sewer pipe networks, stormwater management ponds, plunge pools, creek/channel stabilization measures, LIDs etc.), are the responsibility of the direct developer under section 59, subsection (2) of the Development Charges Act (as a local service), thus have not been identified in this study. Development will be required to provide a storm sewer system sized to include all upstream lands and/or proposed developments, including the outfall section of the storm sewer to an approved location. The storm sewer system may also require and must include all lands and/or easements, structures, erosion and sedimentation controls, quality and quantity measures (SWM ponds, oil -grit separators, LIDs etc.) and restoration and/or replanting programs. Should over -sizing for upstream development be required, a front -ending agreement or site-specific development charge (amending by-law) will be reviewed and implemented if deemed appropriate. C. PARKLAND DEVLOPMENT With respect to parkland dedication, it is assumed that landowners, as part of their subdivision agreements, will be required to undertake rough and fine grading for overland flows and to seed and provision of municipal services (water, sanitary,, storm, and electrical) to the property line. The parkland development costs included in the D.C. are supplementary to that work. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:IPickeringl2017 oC Study'Report'Pickering DC Background Study Finatdocx