Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutENG 02-16Cliq o� PICKERING Report to Executive Committee Report Number: ENG 02 -16 Date: January 11, 2016 From: Richard Holborn Director, Engineering & Public Works Subject: Proposed All -way Stop Control, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road File: A -1440 Recommendation: 1. That the attached draft by -law be enacted to amend Schedule "7" to By -law 6604/05 to provide for the regulation of stop signs on highways or parts of highways under the jurisdiction of The Corporation of the City of Pickering, specifically to address the proposed installation of an all -way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road; and That the existing school crossing guard station on Rosebank Road in front of Rosebank Road Public School be monitored upon installation of the proposed all - way stop and, if additional traffic delays and safety concerns are evident, be relocated to the proposed all -way stop location upon the start of the 2016 -2017 school year in September. Executive Summary: Reports ENG 14 -15 and ENG 20 -15 recommending an all - way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road and relocation of the school crossing guard from the front of the school to the intersection were presented to the Executive Committee on July 6, 2015 and November 9, 2015 respectively. Both reports were referred back to staff to consider additional information and concerns that was presented at those meetings, most recently to consider the additional information and concerns presented during the delegation that was opposed to the City of Pickering staff recommendations. This report is an update to Report ENG 20 -15 and contains additional information requested and a response to the concerns presented in the delegation at the November 9, 2015 Executive Committee meeting. Area residents requested City of Pickering staff to investigate the installation of an all - way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road. Safety concerns have been expressed, specifically in regards to vehicle and pedestrian volumes and sightlines at the intersection. In response to these concerns, Engineering & Public Works staff completed a review of the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road. 10 ENG 02 -16 January 11, 2016 Subject: Proposed All -way Stop Control, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road Page 2 Staff recognizes that the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road has a grade on the north leg such that southbound vehicles approaching the intersection travel up an incline. Observations were completed at the intersection in January 2015, including stopping on the hill during snowy conditions. It was determined that southbound vehicles are able to stop and start on the grade on Rosebank Road when there is snow on the roadway, if required to do so. Area residents of the Rosebank Neighbourhood were informed of the proposed all -way stop control and were given an opportunity to provide comments. Overall there were 27 responses received with 14 residents in support and 13 residents opposed. Overall, based on the results of City of Pickering staff review including the vehicle and pedestrian counts with the City's All -way Stop Warrant being met, Engineering & Public Works staff recommend the placement of an all -way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road. It is the City of Pickering's practice not to install new all -way stops during the winter months and, therefore, recommend that the proposed all -way stop installation occur in April 2016. Engineering & Public Works staff also recommends that the existing school crossing guard station on Rosebank Road in front of Rosebank Road Public School be monitored upon installation of the proposed all -way stop and, if additional traffic delays and safety concerns are evident, be moved to the proposed all -way stop location upon the start of the September 2016 school year. Financial Implications: The installation of stop signs, advance warning signs, and stop bar and pavement markings at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road can be accommodated within the 2016 Roads Current Budget. Discussion: Reports ENG 14 -15 and ENG 20 -15 recommending an all - way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road and relocation of the school crossing guard from the front of the school to the intersection were presented to the Executive Committee on July 6, 2015 and November 9, 2015 respectively. At the July 6, 2015 meeting, the Executive Committee determined that additional information was required, specifically information regarding the timing of the traffic counts at the intersection and any impact that the rehabilitation of the bridge on Whites Road at Highway 401 had on the counts. Therefore, the Executive Committee referred Report ENG 14 -15 back to staff. Report ENG 20 -15, which contained additional information that was requested at the July 6, 2015 Executive Committee Meeting, was presented at the November 9, 2015 Executive Committee. At the November 9, 2015 meeting, there was a delegation opposed to the installation of the all -way stop and the relocation of the school crossing guard location citing concerns specifically with respect to engineering practices, vertical alignment, and safety. Two CORP0227 -07/01 revised 11 ENG 02 -16 January 11, 2016 Subject: Proposed All -way Stop Control, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road Page 3 petitions were also presented to the City in the delegation, one with 73 resident signatures in opposition to the proposed all -way stop control and the other with 37 signatures in opposition to the relocation of the school crossing guard. Therefore, the Executive Committee referred Report ENG 20 -15 back to staff to consider the additional information and concerns presented during the delegation. City of Pickering staff reviewed the concerns presented in the delegation and have provided a response to these concerns in Attachment 1. This report is an update of Report ENG 20 -15, and recommends that the school crossing guard location in front of the school remain at its existing location upon installation of the proposed all -way stop at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road. However, it is also recommended that the existing school crossing guard location be monitored and, if additional traffic delays and safety concerns are evident, be relocated to the proposed all -way stop location upon the start of the 2016- 2017 school year in September. Area residents requested City of Pickering staff to investigate the installation of an all - way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road. Safety concerns have been expressed, specifically in regards to vehicle and pedestrian volumes and sightlines at the intersection. In response to these concerns, Engineering & Public Works staff completed a review of the intersection at Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road. City staffs review of the intersection included the following: • collection of pedestrian and vehicle volumes • completion of municipal all -way stop warrants at the intersection • observations of vehicle and pedestrian traffic • review of existing signs and pavement markings • review of the location of the school crossing guard station for Rosebank Road Public School The results of the review and recommendations are presented in the following sections: Review of pedestrian and vehicle volumes at the intersection indicate that an all - way stop control is required based on the City's all -way stop warrant To determine if an all -way stop control is required at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road, staff completed municipal all -way stop warrants, in accordance with the City's Safer Streets Traffic Management Strategy. The City's All -way Stop CORP0227- 07/01 revised 12 ENG 02 -16 January 11, 2016 Subject: Proposed All -way Stop Control, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road Page 4 Warrant calculates whether an all -way stop control is required, taking pedestrian and vehicular volumes, reported collision history and sightlines into consideration. Eight -hour vehicle and pedestrian turning movement counts were completed at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road on Thursday, June 12, 2014 and again on Wednesday, January 21, 2015. The June 12, 2014 count was completed during the rehabilitation of the bridge at Whites Road and Highway 401. The traffic count on June 12, 2014 was not impacted by the bridge rehabilitation on Whites Road given the location of the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road in relation to the location of the bridge rehabilitation project. The specific time periods for the traffic count were 7:00 am to 9:00 am,11:00 am to 1:00 pm and 2:00 pm to 6:00 pm. The peak hour for both vehicular and pedestrian traffic for the morning and afternoon periods at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road are as follows: • June 12, 2014: 7:45 am to 8:45 am and 5 :00 pm to 6:00 pm • January 21, 2015: 8:00 am to 9 :00 am and 5:00 pm to 6:00 pm The City's warrants for all -way stop controls were met with Warrant 2: Minimum Vehicle Volume being satisfied for both the June 12, 2014, and January 21, 2015 counts. This warrant is a reduced standard approved in the City's Safer Streets Traffic Management Strategy 2003 and is 70% of the Provincial All Way Stop Warrant. The June 12, 2014 and January 21, 2015 all -way stop warrants for the intersection can be found in Attachment 2 and Attachment 3. Although a warrant has been met, City staff were concerned regarding other factors listed in the City's Safer Streets Traffic Management Strategy where all -way stop controls should not be implemented, including: • where the protection of pedestrians, school children in particular, is a prime concern • where traffic would be required to stop on grades Staff recognize that when travelling southbound on Rosebank Road from Granite Court motorists must travel up a 9.35 percent grade for approximately 40 metres, which then transitions into a 2.3 percent grade for approximately 50 metres as it levels out at the intersection with Toynevale Road. Staff also recognize that there is a hidden intersection warning sign at the bottom of the hill for southbound travelling vehicles. It is because of the hill on the north leg that City staff have maintained the position in the past, not to install an all -way stop at the intersection. Knowing that the intersection is now warranted for installation of an all -way stop control based on vehicle volumes, observations were completed at the intersection in January 2015, including the ability of vehicles to stop and start on the hill during snowy CORP0227 -07/01 revised 13 ENG 02 -16 January 11, 2016 Subject: Proposed All -way Stop Control, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road Page 5 conditions. It was determined that a southbound vehicle could stop and start on the grade on Rosebank Road from a queue approaching the intersection, when there is snow on the roadway. In addition, to assist with school children crossing the intersection to and from Rosebank Road Public School, it would be recommended that the existing school crossing guard station in front of Rosebank Road Public School be relocated to the intersection. Also, City staff recognizes that there are other locations in the City of Pickering where vehicles are required to stop on grades. Examples of these include: • Major Oaks Road and Duberry Drive: eastbound all -way stop (5.5 percent grade) • Third Concession Road and Brock Road: westbound traffic signals (6 percent grade for approximately 205 metres) An All -way stop control would not be warranted based on collision history or sightlines at the intersection The reported collision history for the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road indicates that there were six reported angle /turning movement collisions during the previous five year period that are correctable by the installation of an all -way stop control, which is an average of 1.2 collisions per year. The City's All -way Stop Warrant requires there to be an occurrence of three or more reportable collisions per year, averaged over three years, correctable through the installation of all -way stop controls. Therefore, an all -way stop control is not warranted based on collision history. Although there is a grade on the north leg of the intersection, sightlines are sufficient for the posted speed limit of 40 km /h provided that a vehicle turning from Toynevale Road to Rosebank Road waits a few seconds to allow for southbound vehicles at the bottom of the hill on Rosebank Road to reach the top of the hill. Therefore, an all -way stop control is not warranted based on sightlines. Feedback from residents received by City staff indicates a split among residents on the installation of an all -way stop A letter dated March 31, 2015 was sent to all residents, approximately 900 homes, within the Rosebank Neighbourhood. The letter indicated that City staff were proposing an all -way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road, and provided area residents an opportunity to review and provide comments on the proposed all -way stop control, as well as to indicate their support or opposition. CORP0227 -07/01 revised 14 ENG 02 -16 January 11, 2016 Subject: Proposed All -way Stop Control, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road Page 6 The letter to residents generated only 27 replies. A summary of those that were in support and those that were opposed are as follows: • replies that were in support of an all -way stop control: 14 (52 %) • replies that were opposed to an all -way stop control: 13 (48 %) Residents that were in support of the all -way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road indicated the following: • better for sightlines especially for motorists turning off Toynevale Road • pedestrians, especially children going to Rosebank Road Public School, will be safer if vehicles have to stop at the intersection • will slow traffic making it safer for all users of the roadway It is important to note that City staff is not recommending the all -way stop to control speeds, but is recommending the all -way stop because it meets the City's warrant, as described in the Safer Streets Traffic Management Strategy, based on traffic volumes for an all -way stop. Residents that were opposed to the all -way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road indicated the following: • will make it more difficult to get up the hill in the winter, especially if there is a vehicle queue at the intersection • an increase of rear -end accidents for traffic on Rosebank Road will occur due to motorists accelerating up the hill towards the stop and running into the back of another vehicle • a back -up of traffic will occur in the morning and afternoon when motorists are entering and exiting the neighbourhood via Rosebank Road, Granite Court, Whites Road to Highway 401 Following the community consultation, a petition was delivered at the July 6, 2015 Executive Committee meeting with 57 signatures in support of an all -way stop at the intersection. In summary, based on the results of the vehicle and pedestrian count with the City's All - way Stop Warrant being met, Engineering & Public Works staff recommend the placement of an all -way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road. The City of Pickering's standard practice is to not install new all -way stop controls during the winter months and, therefore, recommend that the proposed all - way stop installation occur in April 2016. CORP0227 -07/01 revised 15 ENG 02 -16 January 11, 2016 Subject: Proposed All -way Stop Control, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road Page 7 Engineering & Public Works staff also recommends that the existing school crossing guard location in front of the school be monitored and, if additional traffic delays and safety concerns are evident, that the existing crossing guard location be moved to the proposed all -way stop location upon the start of the September 2016 school year. The proposed all -way stop control can be seen in Attachment 4. The proposed by -law amendment to Schedule 7 of By -law 6604/05 is presented in Attachment 5. Attachments: 1. Response to Delegation, Proposed All -way Stop Control, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road 2. All -way Stop Warrant, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road, June 12, 2014 3. All -way Stop Warrant, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road, January 21, 2015 4. Location Map - Proposed All -way Stop Control, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road 5. Proposed By -law 6604/05 Amendment — Schedule 7, Stop Signs CORP0227 -07/01 revised 16 ENG 02 -16 January 11, 2016 Subject: Proposed All -way Stop Control, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road . Page 8 Prepared By: ,41?_77 Nathan Emery Coordinator, Traffic Operations Darrell Selsky, CET, CMM III Manager, Capital Projects & Infrastructure NE:mjh Approved /Endorsed By: Richiard Holborn, P. Eng. Dir(ector, Engineering & Public Works Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Tony Prevedel, P.Eng. Chief Administrative Officer - af(zofs CORP0227 -07!01 revised 17 ATTACHMENT# I REPORT# � �1 ` -'2 -i CP-aS23 --IS of To: Tony Prevedel P. Eng. Chief Administrative Officer From: Richard Holborn P. Eng. Director, Engineering & Public Wo Copy: Manager, Capital Projects & Infras Office of the CAO Received File Folluw Up m Vplayor Com Sery uncil C &R Directors Eng Services SMT Oper & Fac Clerk Corp Services RS Fire Office Sustain Human Res Plan & Dev rUCtyLe al & LS emo cember 11, 2015 Subject: Response to Delegation - Proposed All -way Stop Control, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road File: 0 -2400 -001 On November 9, 2015, Ms. Renata Rozinger appeared as a delegation before the Executive Committee in opposition to the staff recommendation in Report ENG 20 -15. Report ENG 20 -15 recommended an all -way stop control be installed at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road and that the existing crossing guard location currently in front of the school on Rosebank Road be relocated to the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road. Two petitions were also presented to the City in the delegation, one with 73 resident signatures in opposition to the proposed all -way stop control and the other with 37 signatures in opposition to the relocation of the school crossing guard. With respect to the petitions, City staff notes that the 73 signatures come from 52 households, one of which is on Twyn Rivers Drive, which was not included in the original survey. The second petition with the 37 signatures, is from 26 households. This memorandum highlights the main points, engineering practices, vertical alignment, and safety concerns, made by Ms. Rozinger in her delegation and provides City staffs response to these concerns. 1. Engineering Practices During the delegation Ms. Rozinger made reference to the Ontario Traffic Manual (OTM), Book 5 Regulatory signs, and the City's Safer Streets Traffic Management Strategy (SSTMS) indicating that both documents indicate that stop signs should not be installed under the following conditions: • where the protection of pedestrians, school children in particular, is a prime concern • as a speed control device • where traffic would be required to stop on grades • where visibility is hampered by curves or grades, and insufficient safe stopping distance exists 18 ATTACHMENT #_ °i O REPORT# 1:7N (1 h .Z.- i All the previous points are general guidelines.forlinstallation of all- way -stop sign. However, staff has already taken this into consideration during our initial review, as noted with the following; Residents; that were in support of the all- way -stop control at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road also indicated thatth'e pedestrians, especially children going to Rosebank Road Public School,wiil be safer if 'vehicles have to stop at the intersection, All -way stops are occasionally installed to .allow for a safe pedestrian crossing at an intersection. Staff are recommending the all-way stop primarily due to the warrants being met based on volume. The primary reason is, not to provide protection for school children as a school crossing guard station is already. in place. • The all -way stop,is not being recommended as a speed control device. It is being recommended because it met the, City's,All way Stop Warrant requirements, Warrant 2 Minimum Vehicle Volume; for installation':' ° --- • Although the visibility at the intersection varies depending on where'an approaching southbound vehicle is located, the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road does have sufficient stopping sight distance at the intersection and the grade is within the allowable limits. Grades at the intersection are described in greater detail in the vertical alignment section of this memorandum. The installation of permanent advance stop ahead signs for the southbound movement will warn motorists of the upcoming stop control. It should also be noted that the City does not consult with other municipalities or organizations, such as Institute of Transportation Engineers, Ontario Traffic Council, and Ontario Good Roads Association, with respect to placement of a stop signs within City boundaries. 2. Traffic Counts The validity of the traffic counts were also questioned citing that both traffic counts were completed during the rehabilitation of the Whites Road Bridge at Highway 401. Eight -hour vehicle and pedestrian counts at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road were conducted on Thursday, June 12, 2014 and again on Wednesday, January 21, 2015. City staff has confirmed that there was no bridge construction during the January 21, 2015 traffic count. 3, Vertical Alignment In the delegation to the Executive Committee, there was concern regarding the 9.5 percent grade on Rosebank Road just north of Toynevale Road, Both Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road are designated as urban collector roadways in the City's Official Plan. There is currently a 9.35 percent upward grade when travelling southbound on the Rosebank Road for approximately 40 meters, which then transitions into a 2.3 percent grade for approximately 50 meters. The intersection itself is not at a steep grade. As per the Transportation Association of Canada (TAO) guidelines table 2.131, an urban collector undivided December 11, 2015 Response to Delegation Proposed All -way Stop Control, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road Page2of4 19 ATTACHMEI T €� REPORT ,". roadway can have a grade of 6 to 12 % for the speed limits of 30/40/50 km /hour. Therefore the design grades on Rosebank Road are within the allowable limits. Observations were also completed by staff in January 2015 at the intersection, which included stopping on the hill during snowy conditions. It was determined that a vehicle could stop and start on the hill with snow on the roadway if required to do so, 4. Safety concerns In the delegation, it was discussed that operational concerns could arise from the placement of an all -way stop including: • vehicles rear- ending other vehicles • sliding backwards down the hill • vehicles accelerating up the hill and subsequently sliding through the intersection especially in bad weather conditions • potentially hitting a pedestrian While these operational concerns could occur with the placement of the.all -way stop, they could also occur at any location in the City and the Region that is controlled by stop signs or a traffic signal, or even at an uncontrolled intersection, or stretch of road, 5. Traffic Congestion Concern was expressed that the installation of an all -way stop control sign would create traffic congestion on both Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road intersection. Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road, are both urban collector roadways and have a right of way of 20 meters. As per Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) table 1.3.4.2, a typical residential urban collector roadway is designed for traffic volumes ranging from 1,000 to 12,000 vehicles per day. The traffic, volumes per day on both streets is close to 4,900, which is substantially less than TAC design guidelines. As per the Ontario Traffic Manual guidelines, the purpose of the STOP sign is to clearly assign right -of -way between vehicles approaching an intersection from different directions. 6. School Crossing Location The delegation mentioned that vehicles travelling south on Rosebank Road may not stop at the proposed ail -way stop, which is a safety concern for all pedestrians at the intersection, school children in particular. Ms. Rozinger, strongly opposed the relocation of the school crossing guard for this reason indicating that it is currently in the preferred location as children will not travel north to go south at the intersection. Although it is recognized by City staff that some school children may not travel north on Rosebank Road to the intersection of Toynevale Road to then go south, it should also be recognized that pedestrians coming from the south on Rosebank Road can use the existing all -way stop at the December 11, 2015 Response to Delegation Proposed All -way Stop Control, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road 20 Page 3 of 4 AT T .CI I`1ENT- T O REPORT #_ c=n o 2_ -10 intersection of Cowan Circle and Dahlia Crescent to cross the road, and that all motorists are expected to come to a complete stop at the intersection. Staff are also of the opinion that if an all -way stop is placed at Rosebank Road & Toynevale Road and there is an existing all -way stop control at Rosebank Road and Cowan Circle /Dahlia Crescent, the requirement to also have vehicles stop mid -block at the school crossing guard station may invoke driver frustration, and may also contribute to more traffic congestion on Rosebank Road in the vicinity of the school, Staff supports the recommendations made in Report ENG 20 -15 and will monitor the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road for operational efficiencies and concerns should the recommendations be approved and implemented. December 11, 2015 Response to Delegation Proposed All -way Stop Control, Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road Page 4 of 4 21 Study Date: June. 12, 2014 Intersection Type: 4 -way INTERSECTION COUNT DATA CHME NT #_ All -Way Stop Warrant (Local and Minor Collector Streets) Road Legal Road Direction Speed Class Major Road: Rosebank Road n/s 40 Collector Minor Road: Toynevale Road e/w 40 Collector Hour Major Minor Total Exceeds Major Minor Exceeds Exceeds Ending Volume Volume Volume 245 % % 75/25 split 65/35 split 8:00 245 112 357 Yes 68.6% 31.4% Yes 9:00 339 179 518 Yes 65.4% 34.6% Yes 12:00 232 106 338 Yes 68.6% 31.4% Yes 13:00 261- 92 353 Yes 73.9% 26.1% Yes 15:00 262 87 349 Yes 75.1% 24.9% Yes 16:00 373 149 522 Yes 71.5% 28.5% Yes 17:00 444 220 664 Yes 66.9% 33.1% Yes 18:00 531 293 824 Yes • 64.4% 35.6% No Peak Hours Ending 8:45 363 164 527 Yes 68.9% 31.1% Yes 12:45 276 94 370 Yes 74.6% 25.4% Yes 18:00 531 293 824 Yes 64.4% 35.6% No Warrant Evaluation Warrant 1 Traffic Control Traffic control signals are warranted but cannot be implemented immediately Warrant 2 Minimum Vehicle Volume Total vehilce volume on all approaches exceeding 70% of 350 (245) for highest hour Yes recorded; and 3 -way intersection volume split not exceeding 75/25 for highest hour recorded. OR 4 -way intersection volume split ratio not exceeding 65/35 for highest hour recorded. Warrant 3 Collision History Yes Occurance of 3 or more reportable right -angle collisions of a type correctible through the No installation of an all -way stop in a 12 month period averaged over 3 years. There were 6 reported angle /turning movement collisions during the last 5 years. (Avg. 1.2 per year) 22 1 of 2 C-1 DL- All -Way Stop Warrant (Local and Minor Collector Streets) Warrant 4 Sightline Requirments The minimum stopping sighjt distance at this intersection is less than the applicable criteria for No wet pavement as specified in the Stopping Sight Distance table below Design Speed (km /h) Stopping Sight Distance Required (m) 40 50 50 60 60 85 70 110 The stopping sight distance varies, vehicles can be seen on Rosebank at Granite Court when looking from the Toynevale intersection but cannot been seen in the area just south of the Granite Court until close to Toynevale. The blind spot is <50m from the intersection of Toynevale Note: For the multi -way stop to be technically justified, any individual warrant must be satisfied. All -Way Stop Warrants Met: Yes 2 of 2 23 :AT TA ' °e i ENT `€ h RE PO RT1. e , Gi I of_� All -Way Stop Warrant (Local and Minor Collector Streets) Study Date: January. 21, 2015 Intersection Type: 4 -way INTERSECTION COUNT DATA Road Legal Road Direction Speed Class Major Road: Rosebank Road n/s 40 Collector Minor Road: Toynevale Road e/w 40 Collector Hour Major Minor Total Exceeds Major Minor Exceeds Exceeds Ending Volume Volume Volume 245 % % 75/25 split 65/35 split 8:00 225 115 340 Yes 66.2% 33.8% Yes 9:00 442 251 693 Yes 63.8% 36.2% No 12:00 171 77 248 Yes 69.0% 31.0% Yes .13:00 158 63 221 No 71.5% 28.5% Yes 15:00 155 80 235 No 66.0% 34.0% Yes 16:00 317 119 436 Yes 72.7% 27.3% Yes 17:00 218 119 337 Yes 64.7% 35.3% No 18:00 309 146 455 Yes 67.9% 32.1% ' Yes Peak Hours Ending 9:00 442 251 . 693 Yes 63.8% 36.2% No 12:00 171 77 248 Yes 69.0% 31.0% Yes 18:00 309 146 455 Yes 67.9% 32.1% Yes Warrant Evaluation Warrant 1 Traffic Control Traffic control signals are warranted but cannot be implemented immediately No Warrant 2 Minimum Vehicle Volume Total vehilce volume on all approaches exceeding 70% of 350 (245) for highest hour Yes recorded; and 3 -way intersection volume split not exceeding 75/25 for highest hour recorded. OR 4 -way intersection volume split ratio not exceeding 65/35 for highest hour recorded. Yes Warrant 3 Collision History Occurance of 3 or more reportable right -angle collisions of a type correctible through the No installation of an all -way stop in a 12 month period averaged over 3 years. There were 6 reported angle /turning movement collisions during the last 5 years. (Avg. 1.2 per year) 24 1 of 2 ENT# •! tr4 REPOR TT ).%_-N d.--7 V 2 1 T �� -of 2- All-Way Stop Warrant (Local and Minor Collector Streets) Warrant 4 Sightline Requirments The minimum stopping sighjt distance at this intersection is less than the applicable criteria for No wet pavement as specified in the Stopping Sight Distance table below Design Speed (km /h) Stopping Sight Distance Required (m) 40 50 50 60 60 85 70 110 The stopping sight distance varies, vehicles can be seen on Rosebank at Granite Court when looking from the Toynevale intersection but cannot been seen in the area just south of the Granite Court until close to Toynevale. The blind spot is <50m from the intersection of Toynevale Note: For the multi -way stop to be technically justified, any individual warrant must be satisfied. All -Way Stop Warrants Met: Yes 2 of 2 25 REPCR` €-f Proposed All -way Stop Control Existing Crossing Guard Location to be monitored Kasebnl( ©: Public Sc *: (*) Engineering & Public Works Department SCALE: Proposed All -way Stop Control Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road 26 nip t N r2 The Corporation of the City of Pickering By -law No. Being a by -law to amend by -law 6604/05 providing for the regulating of traffic and parking, standing and stopping on highways or parts of highways under the jurisdiction of the City of Pickering and on private and municipal property. Whereas, By -law 6604/05, as amended, provides for the regulating of traffic and parking on highways, private property and municipal property within the City of Pickering, and Whereas, it is deemed expedient to amend Schedule 7 to By -law 6604/05 to establish an ail -way stop control at the intersection of Rosebank Road and Toynevale Road. Now therefore the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as follows: 1. Schedule 7 to By -law 6604/05, as amended, is hereby further amended thereto by the following: Schedule 7 Stop Signs Column 1 Column 2 Highway Compulsory Stop Facing Traffic Add Rosebank Road @ Rosebank Road, northbound and southbound Toynevale Road 27 By -law No. XXXX ATTACHMENT TO REPO Page 2 2. This By -law shall come into force on the date that it is approved by the Council of the City of Pickering and when signs to the effect are installed. By -law passed this 18th day of January, 2016. 28 David Ryan, Mayor Debbie Shields, City Clerk