HomeMy WebLinkAboutCST 36-11
Cal, o0 Report To
Executive Committee
PI `KERING Report Number: CST 36-11
1 1 6 Date: September 12, 2011
From: Gillis A. Paterson
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
Subject: Tender / Contract Approval
- Councils' Summer Recess
Recommendation:
1. That Report CST 36-11 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer regarding
tender and contract approvals during Councils' Summer Recess be received; and,
2. That Council pass a resolution ratifying the approval of the Tenders and Contracts
by the Chief Administrative Officer during Councils' summer recess being: Request
for Proposal No. RFP-2-2011 - Design, Supply and Installation of two Ultra Violet
Treatment Systems at two City Pools; and, Request for Proposal No. RFP-3-2011 -
Redesign of Website.
Executive Summary: Council is required to approve contracts awarded by the Chief
Administrative Officer during recesses of Council. The tender and contract approvals
contained in this report were approved by the Chief Administrative Officer during the
summer recess of Council, which met City Policy and were within the approved Budget.
Financial Implications: The capital projects listed and described in this report are being
funded from various sources as approved by Council in Capital Budgets.
The total projected costs are below budget in the net amount of $4,868.24 and the surplus
funds will be returned to the various funding sources for use in future budgets.
The projects were awarded to the only proponent of one RFP and the highest scoring
proponent for the other RFP and were within budget as required by Resolution #80/02
and therefore within staff's authority to approve during Council's recess. There are no
additional financial implications associated with these projects or this report.
Sustainability Implications: The addition of the UV systems will reduce the use of harsh
chemicals in water, resulting in the reduction of maintenance costs as well as improving
the safety and quality of water.
Report CST 36-11 Date: September 12, 2011
Subject: Tender / Contract Approval Page 2
- Councils' Summer. Recess 117
Background: On May 21, 2002 Council passed Resolution #80/02 Item 4
authorizing the Chief Administrative Officer act in Council's approving capacity on behalf of
Council during any recess, break or absence of City Council, which states in part:
"2. That, subject to the Council approved Purchasing Policy & Procedures, the Chief
Administrative Officer be authorized to act in Council's approval capacity on behalf
of Council during any recess, break or absence of City Council on the condition
that.
(a) such actions are in compliance with the Purchasing Policy & Procedure as
approved under Resolution 136102; and
(b) the costs thereof are within the budget previously approved by Council; and
(c) a report respecting those approvals is subsequently submitted to Council."
Circumstances were such that two proposals required approval by the Chief
Administrative Officer during Council's summer 2011 recess. It is recommended that
Council receive this Report for information and ratify the approval of Request for
Proposal No. RFP-2-2011, Design, Supply and Installation of two Ultra Violet Treatment
Systems at two City Pools and Request for Proposal No. RFP-3-2011, Redesign of
Website (cityofpickering.com).
Therefore, under authority of the foregoing, the following was approved by the Chief
Administrative Officer during the "summer recess" of Council:
Request for Proposal No. RFP-2-2011, Design, Supply and Installation of two Ultra
Violet Treatment Systems at two City Pools
The only proposal, No. RFP-2-2011 submitted by Water & Ice North America Inc., in
the amount of $75,753.00 plus HST be approved.
Financial Implications:
1. RFP Amount
RFP-2-2011 $75,753.00
HST (13%) 9,847.89
Subtotal 85,600.89
HST (11.24%) (8,514.64)
Total $77,086.25
Report CST 36-11 Date: September 12, 2011
Subject: Tender /Contract Approval Page 3
Councils' Summer Recess
2. Approved Source of Funds
Community Services Department Capital
Rec. Complex -Pool Capital Budget
Location Project Code Source of Budget Required
Funds
Disinfection System 5733.1101 Recreation $80,000 $77,086
Recreation Complex Pool
Complex Pool Surcharge
Total Funds $77,086
3. Estimated Project Costing Summa
RFP-2-2011 $75,753
Miscellaneous Costs 0
Total Project Costs $75,753
HST (13%) 9,847
Total Gross Project Cost 85,600
HST Rebate (11.24%) (8,514)
Total Net Project Cost $77,086
Project Cost under (over) approved funds by $2,914
Request for Proposal No. RFP-3-2011 Redesign of Website (cityofpickering.com)
The highest ranking proposal submitted by eSolutions in the amount of $96,350 plus HST
be approved.
Financial Implications:
1. RFP Amount
RFP-3-2011 $ 96,350.00
HST (13%) 12,525.50
Subtotal $108,875.50
HST (11.24%) based on $96,350.00 (10,829.74)
85,520.26
10,829.74
Total Net Cost $ 98,045.76
Report CST 36-11 Date: September 12, 2011
Subject: Tender / Contract Approval Page 4
- Councils' Summer Recess
2. Approved Source of Funds
2011 Current Budget Summary
Corporate Priorities
Source of Funds Budget Required
Current Budget $130,000 $128,045.76
Total Funds $128,045.76
3. Estimated Project Costing Summa
RFP-3-2011 $ 96,350.00
HST (13%) 12,525.50
Sub Total $108,875.50
HST Rebate (11.24%) (10,829.74)
Total Net Cost $ 98,045.76
*Miscellaneous Costs (writing and photography) 30,000.00
Total Project Costs $128,045.76
Project Cost under (over) approved funds by [$130,000 -$128,045.76] $1,954.24
Attachments:
1. Community Services Memorandum, July 19, 2011
2. Office of Sustainability Memorandum, August 12, 2011
3. Resolution #80/02, Item #4
4. Resolution #85/00, Item #1
Prepared By: Approved / Endorsed By:
Vera A. Felgemacher Gillis A. Paterson, C.M.A.
C.P.P., CPPO, CPPB, C.P.M., CMM III Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
Manager, Supply & Services
GAP:vaf
Report CST 36-11 Date: September 12, 2011
Subject: Tender / Contract Approval Page 5
120 - Councils' Summer Recess
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering City Council
. 2-4 2-011
Tony Prevedel, P.Eng.
Chief Administrative Officer
ATTACHMENT # TO REPORT # C->' 36 ~1 I
1 21
Office of the CAO
PICKERING Received 1 Memo
fait BICENTENNIAL 2011 File
rolluvw up
To: Tony Prevedel Mayor Corn Serv July 19,-2011
Chief Administrative Officer council c&R
Directors Eng Services
From: Everett Buntsma sMT oiler & Fac
Director, Community Services Clerk Corp Services
Fire office Sustain
Copy: Director, Corporate Services & T e SQ:1111i pan Res Plan & Dev
Division Head,- Culture & Recrea o Legal & Ls
Manager, Supply & Services
(Acting) Manager, Culture & Recreation
Supervisor, Facilities Operations
Subject: Request for Proposal No. RFP-2-2011
Design, Supply and Installation of two Ultra Violet Treatment Systems
at Two (2) City Pools
- File: A-1440-001-11
Requests for Proposals were invited from six companies. A.rnandatory site visit.was held on
Monday, June 6, 2011 and three (3) bidders attended of which one (1) responded by the official
closing date and time. The lowest acceptable proposal was submitted by Water & Ice North
America Inc.
Recommendation:
1. That proposal No. RFP-2-2011 submitted by Water & Ice North America Inc. at a cost of
$85,600.89 (HST included) be accepted;
2. That the total gross project cost of $85,600.89 (HST included) and 'a net project cost of
$77,086 (net of HST rebate) be approved;
3. That the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be authorized to fund the project in the .
sum of $77,086 from the Recreation Complex Pool Surcharge Reserve as provided for in
the approved 2011 Capital Budget - Recreation Complex Pool;
4. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take necessary action to
give effect thereto.
Executive Summary:
122
The addition of UV disinfection systems for the main and tot pools at the Pickering Recreation
Complex were approved by Council in the 2011 Capital Budget at an estimated cost of $80,000.
The installation of these two systems will improve disinfection, lower chlorine usage and reduce
chloramines in City pools.
Requests for Proposals were invited from six companies and the only proposal received was
submitted by Water & Ice North America Inc. This company's references have been checked and
are deemed acceptable by the Director, Community Services. The total net project cost to supply
and install the UV disinfection system is $77,086 (net of HST rebate).
The Community Services Department recommends that the bid of Water & Ice North America Inc.
be accepted.
Financial Implications:
1. RFP Amount
RFP-2-2011 $75,753.00
HST (13%) 9,847.89
Subtotal' 851600.89
HST (11.24%) 8 514.64
Total $77,086.25
2. Approved Source of Funds
Community Services Department Capital
Rec. Complex -Pool Capital Budget
Location Project Code Source of Budget Required
Funds
Disinfection System 5733.1101 Recreation $80,000 $77,086
- Recreation Complex Pool
Complex Pool Surcharge
Total Funds $77,086
July 19, 2011 Page 2
RFP-2-2011
Design, Supply and Installation of two Ultra
Violet. Treatment Systems
at Two (2) City Pools
3. Estimated Project Costing Summa 123
RFP-2-2011 $75,753
Miscellaneous Costs 0
Total Project Costs $75,753
HST (13%) 9.847
Total Gross Project Cost 85,600
HST Rebate (11.24%) (8,514)
Total Net Project Cost $77,086
Project Cost under (over) approved funds by $2,914
The 2011 Budget for the design, supply and installation of two UV disinfection systems was
approved to be funded from the Recreation Complex .Pool Surcharge Reserve.
Sustainability Implications:
The addition of the UV systems will reduce the use of harsh chemicals in water, resulting in the
reduction of maintenance costs as well as improving the safety and quality of water.
Background:
The addition of proven UV technology used in the treatment of drinking water in pools has enabled
municipalities to provide increased protection to the participants and users of the swimming pools
in the City. The City pools are used seven days per week, seventeen hours per day and the
high bather loads associated with public pools can. easily overwhelm traditional methods
of disinfection such as chlorine treatment. Ultraviolet disinfection is proven to improve safety and
protect our patrons against microorganisms, including chlorine. resistant organisms such as
Cryptosporidium.
The use of UV to treat swimming pool water is similar to using UV light to disinfect drinking water.
The UV lamps used for germicidal disinfection produces a portion of its light in the 254-nm
wavelength in medium pressure technology. At the 254-nm wavelength, UV light destroys
bacteria, protozoa, viruses, molds, algae and other microbes. This includes fecal coliform and
July 19, 2011 Page 3
RFP-2-2011
Design, Supply and Installation of two Ultra
Violet Treatment Systems
at Two (2) City Pools
such waterborne diseases such as E-coli, hepatitis, cholera, dysentery, typhoid fever as well as
many others.
124
The use of UV for swimming puol disinfection does not mean the complete elimination of chlorine.
A residual is still required, but using UV for disinfection will lower chemical costs and usage,
provide instantaneous disinfection (chemicals require a residence time), lower disinfection by-
products (chloramines) that have been associated with cancers and.provide less intensive
maintenance.
Benefits of UV disinfection systems
• Virtually eliminates chloramines in the pool (musty chlorine smell)
• Significant increase in water quality
• Reduces the cause of red eye and skin irritation
• No more unpleasant odours
• Provides protection against micro-organisms including Cryptosporidium
• Reduces degradation of building components
• Reduces use of chlorine and associated chemicals
Requests for Proposals were invited from six companies. A mandatory site visit was held on
Monday, June 6, 2011 and three (3) bidders attended of which one (1) responded by the official
closing date and time. The only proposal received was submitted by Water & Ice North America
Inc. This company's references have been checked and are deemed acceptable by the Director,
Community Services.
The Health and Safety Policy, Clearance Certificate issued by Workplace Safety and Insurance
Board (WSIB), the WSIB Cost and Frequency Record and Certificate of Insurance as submitted.
by Water & Ice North America Inc have been reviewed by the Coordinator, Health & Safety and
are deemed acceptable. An evaluation committee comprised of Supply Services staff and
Facilities staff was established to review the proposal against the evaluation criteria set out in the
terms of reference. Water & Ice's proposal was determined to meet all requirements of the
proposal call.
Upon careful review and relevant documents received, the Community Services Department
recommends the acceptance of the proposal No..RFP-2-2011 submitted by Water & Ice North
America Inc. in the amount of $85,600.89 (HST.included) and that the total net project cost of
$77,086 be approved.
In accordance with Purchasing Policy Item 04.09 (RFP) where the total purchase price is greater
than $54,000 Council shall approve the award. In accordance with Resolution #80/02 Item #4, the
CAO has the authority to act in Council's approval capacity during any recess, break or absence
of City Council.
July 19, 2011 Page 4
RFP-2-2011
Design, Supply and Installation of two Ultra
Violet Treatment Systems
at Two (2) City Pools
This report has been prepared in conjunction with the Manager, Supply & Services who concur
with the foregoing. 125
Attachments:
1. Supply & Services Memorandum dated June 17, 2011
2. Proposal Review Committee. Assessment
ed-L do sed By:
Prepared By: Approv
ike winnell Everett B ma
S rvisor, Facilities Operations Director, Operations & Emergency Services
Maris C rpino Gillis Paterson, CMA
(Acting anager, Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
Culture & Recreation
Caryn Kong, CGA "Step n fle olds
Senior Financial Analyst-Capital & Divisi n Head, Culture & Recreation
Debt Management
Vera A. F Igemacher
CSMSP, CPPO, CPPB, CPM, CMM III
Manager,"Supply & Services
EB: mld
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Approval
22, 2_0d
Tony-Prevedel, P.Eng.
Chief Administrative Officer
July 19, 2011 Page 5
RFP-2-2011
Design, Supply and Installation of two Ultra
Violet Treatment Systems
at Two (2) City Pools
PICKERING~._ ~i I-NJ Memo
181 1 BICENTENNIAL 2011
Mike Dwinnell June 17, 2011
To:
Supervisor, Facilities Operations
From: Vera A. Felgemacher
Manager, Supply & Services
Copy: Co-ordinator, Health & Safety
Subject: Request for Proposal No. RFP-2-2011
Design, Supply and Installation of Ultra Violet Treatment Systems at Two (2) City Pools
Closing: Thursday, June 16, 2011, 2:00pm (local time)
- 'File: F-5300-001
Request for proposals were invited from six (6) companies. A mandatory site visit was held on
Monday, June 6, 2011 and three (3) bidders attended of which one (1)•responded by the official
closing date and time.
A preliminary review to ensure the "Essential Submission Requirements" appear in the submission has
been undertaken. This compliance checklist is to be used in evaluating the "overall completeness and
quality of submission". Each item is to be reviewed more closely by committee members and scored
to reflect each item's relevance and value.
Please refer to Terms of Reference - Evaluation of Submissions, Page 8 for instructions on how the
proposal is to be evaluated by committee members.
The Health & Safety documentation received with the submission has been provided to the Co-
ordinator, Health & Safety to review and will be provided a score out. of 3 points for the submission.
This will be combined with the remaining scores during the committee review.to assist in determining
the total average score for the submission.
-Attachments are as follows:
1. Preliminary Compliance Checklist
2. Evaluation form (to be used by Evaluation Committee Members)
3. Copy of Terms of Reference
4. Copy of the proposal received
Please co-ordinate an appropriate date and time to arrange a meeting for the evaluation committee.
Each member should review the submission carefully according to the criteria before the meeting time.
Please do not disclose any information to enquiring bidders during this time - they will be advised of
the outcome in due course. Please direct enquires to Supply & Services.
If yoVre uire further information, please feel free to contact me or a member of Supply & Services.
VAFAttachments
in. m
j c
127
90
o ~ c~ Z D
-I
3 m e 3 3 G
0
CD 0
7• z . -
3 D 3 S m
'c 3 ` CD c0 Z77 -
m ;
((D Y
d
0
N ? O
3 C tD O n
(n. CD
3 _ - (D
W - 7 i N -
O
N .N 3 O O M O
j 7 3 v N 7 X n 7-8
m m to < o x m m• 3 n 'tn N
ivy m m m O a m-0 m N
C
..A O• N c N 7 d tD W cn
N 3 lD 7 m N_• 7C A 7. 0) J
OW /D N O O 7 AG O N
n. O. 7 Co O 3•to 3 4 n
11
O S a - COD to (D O v
03 42
ID
aY .
c . O tG
tD - c n N X
3 .p ?
m S M.
CD = CD
CO 0
O. p O N .
d. Ol
~ O CL d
m 3 2-0 y
» d
am
v r30 3 -0
. d N= 7- 7 N M
W v C^ O O O
O
C
. to r.
d
~2 CD <
c
O .
CD
fD
to = N .
N y C.
.Q~ go n
W
D CD
CL o..
0O+ CD (A
a
o `L
,,ate
o
-0
0 o O
.
it
O
3
3
CD
ATTACHMENT #-2:-TO REPORT # CST 36.1 I
Memo
PicKERNG-
sail BICENTENNIAL 2011
To: Tony Prevedel August 12, 2011
Chief Administrative Officer
From: Tom Melymuk
Director, Office of Sustainability
Copy: Directors
Division Heads
Manager, Supply & Services
eServices Team
Subject: Request for Proposal No. RFP-3-11
Redesign of Website (cityofpickering.com)
- File: A-3200
Requests for Proposals were received from 11 companies, and were evaluated on August 9,
2011. The Evaluation Team was comprised of a cross section of staff:
Tom Melymuk, Director, Office of Sustainability
Jon Storms, Manager, Information Technology
Nancy Johnstone, Website Coordinator
Fiaz Jadoon, Economic Development Officer
Vera.Felgemacher, Manager, Supply & Services
Jill Hone, Buyer
The combined average of two proposals. passed the minimum scoring threshold. The highest
ranking proponent is eSolutions. The lump sum price is $96,350 (excluding HST), and is within
the 2011 Budget Allocation.
Recommendation:
1. That proposal No. RFP-3-2011 submitted by eSolutions at a cost $108,875.50 (HST
included) be accepted;
2. That the total project cost (including writing and photography) of $128,045.76 (HST
included) and a net cost of $98,045.76 (net of HST rebate) be approved;
3. That the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be authorized to fund the project in the
sum of $128,045.76 as allocated in the 2011 Current Budget; and
4. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take necessary action to
give effect thereto.
3. Estimated Project Costing Summa
RFP-3-2011 $ 96,350.00 129
HST (1 s~Io) 12.525.50
Sub Total $108,875.50
HST Rebate (11.24%) 10 829.74
Total Net Cost $ 98,045.76
*Miscellaneous Costs (writing and photography) 30,000.00
Total Project Costs $128,045.76
*In order to move forward with the review and preparation of content to meet our timelines, it was
determined to remove the writing and photography component from RFP requirements and
proceed with retaining a temporary staff person to review and develop content with key staff. This
was approved by the Chief Administrative Officer and the Director, Corporate Services &
Treasurer. As a result, the budget allocation in the 2192-1100 (salary account) will be over
expended, which will be offset by the under expenditure m the website development account 2192-
6100. In total the project is under budget as shown below:
Project Cost under (over) approved funds by [$130,000 -$128,045.76] $1,954.24
The.2011 Budget for the website re-design was approved to be funded from the 219276100
-account.
Corporate Priorities: Our corporate priorities are Community Engagement, Corporate Best
Practices; Human Resource Development, Financial Management and Sustainable Placemaking.
Redevelopment of the corporate website directly aligns with two of our corporate priorities,
Community Engagement and Corporate Best Practices.
Background: As part of our Corporate Priorities initiatives, an eServices Team was
established comprised of a cross-representation of staff. A key objective of the team was to
review best practices, and current technologies to re-develop the City's website. As part of that
review, a focus group was held in November 2010 to review municipal best practices and current
technologies, and to initiate internal discussion on our needs and priorities.
The following Website Objectives were confirmed:
A user-centric, self-serve approach to our service delivery through the use of our website to align
with our corporate priorities, including a key focus on community engagement; promoting
inclusion, transparency and efficiency through the best practices available. We will achieve this
by focusing on the following objectives:
L Functional objective: to utilize current technologies (and future technologies as they
become available) as appropriate to facilitate meeting overall website objectives, i.e. social
media, Google analytics, RSS feeds.
August 12, 2011 Page 3
RFP-3-2011
Website Redesign (cityofpickering.com)
Attachments:
13
1. Supply & Services memo dated August 11, 2011 -
2. Proposal Review Committee Assessment
Prepared By: Approved / Endorsed By:
I VA4~2..
`
od so Tom Melymuk
Manager, Customer & Administrative Director, Office of Sustainability
Services ( -Chair eServices Team)
Lynn Winterstein Gillis Paterson, CMA
Manager, Marketing & Business Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
Development (Co-Chair eServices Team)
i
Nancy Johnst n , . Vera A. Felgemacher
Website Coordinator CSMSP, CPPO, CPPB, CPM, CMM III
Manager, Supply & Services
jh/TM
Approval
20//
6 P_4~~z
f. I-If 4:4 -1 L4
Tony Prevedel, P.Eng.
Chief Administrative Officer
August 12, 2011 Page 5
RFP-3-2011
Website Redesign (cityofpickering.com)
X, 131
1
ICKERING Memo
P
1811 BICENTENNIAL 2011
To: Tom Melymuk August 11, 2011
Director, Office of Sustainability
From: Vera A. Felgemacher
Manager, Supply & Services
Copy: Manager, Marketing and Business Development
Subject: Request for Proposal. No, RFP-3-2011, Redesign of cityofpickering.com
Submission Date: Monday, July 25, 2011, 12:00 Noon (local time)
File: F-5300-001
Further to memo dated July 27, 2011 eleven (11) proposals' proceeded to Stage II of the evaluation
process. Each member of the Evaluation Committee has completed evaluating the eleven (11).
proposals, completing Stage II of the evaluation process.
An Evaluation Committee meeting was held today at 10:00am and a combined average score for each
proposal was determined. The combined average score of two (2) proposals passed the minimum
scoring threshold, proceeding to Stage III of the evaluation process. Stage III consists of a scoring of
the pricing submitted. At the conclusion of Stage III, all scores from Stage II and Stage III of proposals
which passed the minimum threshold have been added. The highest ranking proponent is eSolutions
and.their lump sum price is $96,350.
In accordance with Purchasing Policy and Procedure PUR 010-001, Item 11.02-20, Council approval is
required to award a proposal over $53,000.
Resolution No #80/02 provides authority to the CAO to act in Council's approval capacity on behalf of
Council during any recess, break or absence of City Council. However, debt financing must be approved
by Council
Please prepare a report to include the following items:
(a) any past work experience with eSolutions Group;
(b) without past work experience, if reference information is acceptable;
(c) the appropriate account number(s) to which this work is to be charged;
(d) the budget amount(s) assigned thereto;
(e) Treasurer's confirmation of funding;
(f) related departmental approvals; and
(g) related comments specific to the ,project.
PI ase do not disclose any information to enquiring proponents during this time - they will be advised of
th ` outcome in due course. Please direct inquiries to Supply & Services.
I
If y require further information, please feel free to contact me or a member of Supply & Services.
if VAF/jh
Attachments
i~
PICKERIN.G Memo
181 1 BICENTENNIAL 2011
To: Tom Melymuk July 27, 2011
Director, Office. of Sustainability
From: Vera A. Felgemacher
Manager, Supply & Services
Copy: Manager, Marketing and Business Development
Subject: Request for Proposal No. RFP-3-2011, Redesign of cityofpickering.com
Submission Date: Monday, July 25, 2011, 12:00 Noon (local time)
- File: F-5300-001
Request for proposals were invited from ten (10) companies and an advertisement was posted on the
internet. Eleven (11) companies responded by the official submission date and time.
Evaluation of proposals is performed in three (3) stages.
Reference: Part 3, Evaluation of Proposals, Item 3.2 Stages of Proposal Evaluation:
3.2.1 Stage
Stage I will consist of a review to determine which proposals comply with all of the mandatory
requirements. Proposals failing to satisfy the mandatory requirements as of the Submission Date
will be provided an opportunity to rectify any deficiencies. Proposals failing to satisfy the
mandatory requirements as of the Rectification Date will be excluded from further consideration.
3.2.2 Stage II
Stage II will consist of a scoring by the City.of each qualified proposal on the basis of the rated
criteria.
3.2.3 Stage III
Stage III will consist of a scoring of the pricing submitted. The evaluation of price will be
undertaken after the evaluation of mandatory requirements and any rated requirements has been
completed.
3.2.4 Cumulative Score
At the conclusion of Stage III, all scores from Stage 11 and Stage III will be added and the highest
ranking proponent will be selected for contract negotiations in accordance with Part 4.
During Stage I, two (2) proposals were afforded the opportunity to rectify deficiencies and have
complied. All eleven (11) proposals will proceed to Stage 11.
M" .0 v
CD S- G7 CD p co D D D ~ 3`~
(D = - ► o co 1;2 -S 0 . . . D c c (Cl
` a ` v m ~ < CD fD m
~ m 3 3 CD (D
cD CD - N a CD n • • • . . wwww o
s o ::E wwww v v o - CD
: o n v O U) ° to w iv cn cn cn
0 co
EY m CD -0 70 0 :3 0 0 CL
c r ~~xmx~mv~ O°
O cn Q ~G C~ v " -O =r cr O
CL _0
v to cn m m~ ~3 N m a
(n CZ :3 n CD
CD co (D n M m -n o' o a5.
to O O CL O 7 3 [D
3
r
CD < o Q- 0 3 o v o' O
14, t AN t t < < 3 ° 3 _ m
t t t
D CU CD-D rn D p~CD
CD - c CAD Q0 N 3
3 a' CD dM CD CD
x M g rn
All t t t t t t t t 3 (n 3 R 'o a -cr~
=3 CD W ~ N co (D
N c3
CD ~ ?
t t t. t t t t t t Qa0 w
n a)
7 c
En N
0. O
t t ` t t t t < < c 0 <
N 3 C ~ ~ ~D Iii
(D O = Q
CD 00 3 O N
N :3.O N O'
~ t ~ t t ~ t t t ~ ~0 Qo 0
N -0.-Oft 0
CD G 3 n
_ CD
0 a)
m :3 X v ' . O
O .=r -D Q O O .0
t t t t t t t All All t ~ 3 o v
cnn O O O CD
cn 71 11
O 0
CD CD _a (a
(p c
CD
All t t
t t t t t t o :3 O 3
Q --o
N Q fn
(D v cn
=r
CD a)
t t t t t All 4.1 t t p:0
- O O
p Co N
0, cn
O
y90 Z 3uD 3
Q. 5 CCD o CA CL CL (a
CD ji.
0 a)
(n o
CD a) =r CL o- o
:3 (n
3
mxz o 3 v.
°n~ : mom c
m mm D CL
S. CD M CD =r
m-, 0CL <D O m
0 cn (D CD 42
N) CD 0 3
0) 3
CD CD 2) (n CD
(3D
a
r. n
co 0
-4
to a
7' O' O
c
N
134
0
3 (n 17 CD p co D D. D
CD CD 1, E CD
CD U)
CD U) D a3
o o z 0
LD. :3
(n CD CL
O p (D C7 G) < (n O CL
cn j O O Q. 7 ~D 77,
CD 3 0 CD
CD CD cn
SU c% IIr; O tI1
: O O
Z .
A
CD m
3
x
1 ID M
o c) a cD
IM
N
cn -n
-0 C X M
m O
R D) W (D W
tNriO a'~ ~ O
O m 0
C (D
lu a
to cD
ca m O N
cc no.
3 < x
v N m c
c' ~ 3
CD CA m ~ ~ .
cD N I
.O► N O
~ -a
(D
~O =CD
.
CD
N
p ° CD
N n C O
O ~
N
Cl) --I
t
to 0--i
Ct~
m>
n
o
- 3
3
N
ATTACHMENT # 3 TO REPORT #'S
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT . 1 3 5
CLERK'S DIVISION
R E E;_ gyn.:.
CITY OF FI
MEMORANDUM MAYL 2002
CORPORAi E:'. S i vtt-;p." .
:.May 27, 2002
TO: Tom Quinn, Chief Administrative Officer
Gil Paterson, Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
FROM: Bruce Taylor, Clerk
SUBJECT: Referrals from Council Meeting of May 21, 2002
Please be advised that the Council of the City of Pickering passed Resolution #80/02, Item #4, at the
Council Meeting of May 21, 2002, as follows:
1. That Report to Council CAD 04-02 seeking authorization by the Chief Administrative
Officer to act in Council's approval capacity on behalf of Council during any recess,
break or absence of City Council be received; and
2. That subject to the Council approved Purchasing Policy & Procedure, the Chief
Administrative Officer be authorized to act in Council's approval capacity on behalf
of Council during any recess, break or absence of City Council on the condition that:
a) such actions are in compliance with the Purchasing Policy & Procedure as
approved under Resolution 136/01; and
b) the costs thereof are within the budget previously approved by Council; and
c) a report respecting those approvals is subsequently submitted to Council.
3. That appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to give effect thereto.
Bruce Taylor
BT:dk
Copy: T.J. Quinn, Chief Administrative Officer
ATTACHMENT #.,TO REPORT # C_5 3(0- 11
136
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM
CLERK'S DIVISION
RECEIVED
DATE:. June 6 2000 CITY OF.,PICKERING
JUN 'Q 6
2000
TO: G. Paterson CORPORATE SERVICES
•
birector, Corporate Services & Treasurer
FROM: Bruce Taylor
City. Clerk
Please be advised that the Council of the City of Pickering `passed Resolution 85/00, Item #1 at
the Council Meeting of June 5, 2000, as follows:
That Report to Council CS 12-00 regarding authority for the Director, Corporate Services
Treasurer,` to recommend project financing: approval during `recesses of Council be
received, and
1. The Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, be authorized to recommend and
approve. project financing to the Mayor, and Chief Admmistrmtive Officer for
projects contained in the annual capital budget or current budget, during
recesses of City Council; and
2. That. appropriate officials 'of the.City of Pickering be authorized to give effect
thereto.
This resolution is sent to you for your information.
Bruce Taylor, City Clerk
cc. T.J. Quinn, Chief Administrative Officer