HomeMy WebLinkAboutOES 04-11
cry o~ Report To
Executive Committee
PICKERING Report Number: OES 04-11
Date: January 10, 2011
250
From: Everett Buntsma
Director, Operations & Emergency Services
Subject: Tender for Roof Reinforcement at
East Shore Community Centre
- Tender No. T-25-2010
- File: A-1440-001-11
Recommendation:
1. That Report OES 04-11 of the Director, Operations & Emergency Services
regarding Roof Reinforcement at East Shore Community Centre be received;
2. That Tender T-25-2010 submitted by Lisgar Construction Company at a cost of
$149,160 (HST included) be accepted;
3. That the total gross project cost of $170,630 (HST included) and a net project
cost of $153,658 including the tender amount and other associated costs be
approved as a 2011 project in advance of the presentation and approval of the
2011 Capital Budget;
4. That Council authorizes the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer to finance
the project as follows:
a) That the sum of $150,000 to be financed by the issue of debentures by The
Regional Municipality of Durham over a period not to exceed ten (10) years;
b) That the sum of $3,658 to be funded from Current Funds;
c) That the annual repayment charges from the debenture in the amount of
approximately $20,000 be included in the annual Current Budget for the City of
Pickering commencing in 2011, continuing thereafter until the debenture is
repaid, and any financing cost be paid out of the Current Budget;
d) The Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer has certified that this loan and the
repayment thereof falls within the City's debt and financial obligations approved
annual repayment limit for debt and other financial obligations for 2010 as
approved by the Province for municipalities in Ontario and therefore the Ontario
Municipal Board approval is not required;
Report OES 04-11 January 10, 2011
Subject: Roof Reinforcement at East Shore Community Centre
251 Tender No. T-25-2010 Page 2
e) That the Treasurer be authorized to make any changes, adjustments, and
revisions to amounts, terms, conditions or take any actions necessary in order to
effect the foregoing;
5. That the draft bylaw attached to this report be enacted; and
6. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take necessary
action to give effect thereto.
Executive -Summary:
The roof rehabilitation was approved by Council in the 2010 Capital Budget for the East
Shore Community Centre totaling $210,000. Tenders were received and this project
was initiated in July 2010. During the roof rehabilitation it was discovered that Tectum
deck panels in the north west corner of the building had numerous cuts through the top
of the decking. There were saw cuts most likely caused during the removal of the
previous roof some years prior at the facility. These cuts had permanently damaged
and reduced the strength of the Tectum Panels
The Tectum decking required replacement and the services of a professional structural
engineer was engaged to advise on replacing the damaged panels. During his
investigation it was determined that a large number of the other panels had sagged or
possessed permanent deflections (see Site Inspection Report Egberts Engineering
Limited). The panels are located over the gymnasium, community room, and lawn
bowling room. The engineer had concerns for the snow loading capacity of the roof and
felt that the original roof capacity would have been reduced by approximately 15%.
It was the recommendation of the engineer that the roof be reinforced by adding steel
sections (channels or angles) between the steel joists and to add additional wood
purloins, to reduce the span of the decking.. The engineer was requested to prepare
specifications and stamped drawings to proceed with an additional tendering process
for roof reinforcement work.
The roof reinforcement project resulted in a tender price $149,160 (including HST).
CORP0227-07/01 revised
Report OES 04-11 January 10, 2011
Subject: Roof Reinforcement at East Shore Community Centre
Tender No. T-25-2010 Page 3
252
Financial Implications:
While the actual roof replacement (Phase 1) was included in the 2010 Capital Budget,
the need for rehabilitation of the deck was unforeseen. Given the nature of the repairs
required, time is of the essence. It was not deemed advisable to postpone this project
to March when the budgets are approved. Therefore the project is being put forth now
as a 2011 Capital Budget item.
This will provide for immediate commencement of the needed repairs before winter
snow load conditions become a concern. This will also provide the base of the roof
replacement for 2011. While the roof replacement qualified for 100 per cent funding
from the Federal Gas Tax Grant, rehabilitation of an existing roof support system will
not. Therefore this entire project must be debt financed.
1.
TENDER AMOUNT
T-25-2010 $132,000
HST (13%) 17,160
Sub-Total 149,160
HST Rebate (11.24%) (14,837)
Total $134,323
2.
SOURCE OF FUNDS
Capital Budget
Location Protect Code Source of Funds Budget Required
T-25-2010
Roof 5999.1198.6999 Debt - 10 years $0 $150,000
Reinforcement Current Funds 3,658
Pre-Budget
Approval
Total Funding $153,658
CORP0227-07/01 revised
Report OES 04-11 January 10, 2011
Subject: Roof Reinforcement at East Shore Community Centre
253 Tender No. T-25-2010 Page 4
3.
ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTING SUMMARY
T-25-2010
$132,000
Tender & Miscellaneous Costs 4,000
Construction Contingency 15,000
Total Project Costs $151,000
HST (13%) 19,630
Total Gross Project Cost $170,630
HST Rebate (11.24%) 1( 6,972)
Total Net Project Cost $153,658
Project Cost under.(over) approved funds by ($153,658)
The structural problems currently encountered have resulted in Health and Safety
issues that need to be dealt with immediately and may not be able to await 2011 Capital
Budget approval.
Sustainability Implications:
The existing roof decking requires reinforcement which will extend the useful lifespan of
the roof for many years
Background:
Bids have been received in response to the tender call, which closed on Wednesday,
December 1, 2010. There were two addenda issued on this project. An advertisement
was placed in the Daily Commercial News and on the City's website inviting companies
to download the tendering documents and drawings for the tender. A mandatory site
visit was held on Tuesday November 23, 2010 and six (6) companies attended of which
four bidders responded.
The low bid was submitted by Lisgar Construction Company. This company's
references have been checked and are deemed acceptable by the Director, Operations
and Emergency Services.
CORP0227-07/01 revised
i
Report OES 04-11 January 10, 2011
Subject: Roof Reinforcement at East Shore Community Centre 254
Tender No. T-25-2010 Page 5
The Health and Safety Policy, Clearance Certificate issued by Workplace Safety and
Insurance Board (WSIB), the WSIB Cost and Frequency Record and Certificate of
Insurance as submitted by Lisgar construction Company and have been reviewed by
the Coordinator, Health & Safety and are deemed acceptable. The Certificate of
Insuarance has been reviewed by the Manager, Taxation is deemed acceptable. In
conjunction with staff's review of the contactor's previous work experience and bonding
available on this project, the tender is deemed acceptable.
Upon careful examination of all tenders and relevant documents received, the Facilities
Operations Division recommends the acceptance of the low bid submitted by Lisgar
Construction Company for Tender No. T-25-2010 in the amount of $149,160 (HST
included) and that the total net project cost of $153,658 be approved.
This report has been prepared in conjunction with the Manager, Supply & Services who.
concurs with the foregoing.
Attachments:
1. Supply & Services Memorandum dated December 2nd, 2010
2. Record of Tenders Opened and Checked
3. Site Inspection Report Egberts Engineering Limited
4. By-law to authorize the Roof Reinforcement at East Shore Community Centre in
the City of Pickering and the issuance of debentures therefor in the amount of
$150,000.
Prepared By: Approved / Endorsed By:
pupe w innell Everett Bunts
rvisor, Facilities Operations Director, Operations & Emergency
Services
Caryn Kong, CGA Gillis a erson, CMA
Senior Financial Analyst- Capital & Director, Corporate Services &
Debt Management Treasurer
CORP0227-07/01 revised
Report OES 04-11 January 10, 2011
Subject: Roof Reinforcement at East Shore Community Centre
255 Tender No. T-25-2010 Page 6
Vera A. F Igemacher
C.P.P., CPPO, CPPB, C.P.M., CMM III
Manager, Supply & Services
MD: and
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended for the consideration
of Pickerin ity Cou it
20,2010
Tony Preve el
Chief Administrative Officer
i
i
CORP0227-07/01 revised
ATTACHMENT# TO REPORT#Q. 04 I
of c=
256
o¢
Cif
PICKERING memo.
To: Everett Bunts ma December 2, 2010
Director, Operations & Emergency Services
From: Vera A. Felgemacher
Manager, Supply & Services
Copy: Supervisor, Facilities Operations
Subject: Tender No. T-25-2010
Tender for Roof Reinforcement at Eastshore Community Centre
Closing Date: December 1, 2010
File: F-5400-01
Tenders have been received for the above project. An advertisement was placed in the Daily
Commercial News and on the City's website inviting companies to download the tendering
documents and drawings for the above mentioned tender. Two (2) addenda were issued on
this project. A mandatory site visit was held on Tuesday, November 23, 2010 and six (6)
bidders attended of which four.(4) bidders responded.
A copy of the Record of Tenders Opened and Checked used at the public tender opening is
attached. Tenders shall be irrevocable for 60 days after the official closing date and time.
Purchasing Procedure No. PUR 010-001, Item 10.03 (r) provides checking tendered unit
prices and.extensions; unit prices shall govern and extensions will be corrected accordingly,
which has been done.
SUMMARY
Harmonized Sales Tax included
Bidder Total Tendered Amount After Calculation Check
Lisgar Construction Company $149,160.00 $149,160.00
Aplus General Contractors
Corp. $219,220.00
.
Automatic rejection - Bid does not acknowledge addenda
Reference: Purchasing By-law No. 5900-01, Procedure No
Joe Pace & Sons Contracting PUR 010-001, 10.04, Item 7-12; Information to Bidders Items
Inc. 7(b), 22, 23, 24, 37, 39, Advertisement; City of Pickering
Website, Supply & Services, General Information - General
Instructions, Item 1; and City of Pickering Website, Current Bid
Opportunities - Downloading Instructions.
John McLellan Contracting Inc. No Bid
ATTACHMENT4-1- TO REPORT 257 of
Pursuant to Information to Bidders Item 26, the following will be requested of the selected
bidder for your review during the evaluation stage of this tender call. Please advise when you
wish us to proceed with this task.
(a) A copy of the Health and Safety Policy to be used on this project;
(b) A copy of the current Workplace Injury Summary Report issued by Workplace Safety
& Insurance Board (in lieu of the Workplace Injury Summary Report document, a copy
of the current CAD. 7, NEER, or MAP reports may be submitted);
(c) A copy of the current Clearance Certificate issued by Workplace Safety & Insurance
Board;
(d) The City's certificate of insurance or approved alternative form shall be completed by
the bidder's agent, broker or insurer;
(e) list of Sub-Contractors in accordance with General Conditions Item 31;
(f) Such further information, as the City. may request in writing.
Include the following items in your Report to Council.-
(a). if items (a) through (c) noted above, are acceptable to the Co-ordinator, Health & Safety,
(b) if item (d) - Insurance - is acceptable to the Manager, Taxation;
(c) any past work'experience with the low bidder - Lisgar Construction Company - including
work location;
(d) without past work experience, if reference information is acceptable;
(e) .-the appropriate account number(s) to which this work is to be charged;
(f) the budget amount(s) assigned thereto;
(g) Treasurer's confirmation of funding;
(h) related departmental approvals;
(i) any reason(s) why the low bid is not acceptable; and
(j) related comments specific to the project..
Egberts Engineering Limited as the consultants on this project will be reviewing submissions
and making recommendations to you. The consultant should also review carefully all submittal
information based on tendering instructions. If the consultant notices any infractions or
information missing during the evaluation, please contact a member of Supply & Services as
soon as possible.
Please do not disclose any information to enquiries except you can direct them to the City's
website for the unofficial bid results as read out at the Public Tender opening. Bidders will be
ad ised of the outcome in due course.
If y, u require further information, please feel free to contact me or a member of Supply &
Se ices.
VAF/jg
Attachments
December 2, 2010
Tender No. T-25-2010 Page 2
Tender for Roof Reinforcement at Eastshore
Community Centre
ATTACHMENT#~~ TO REPORT#OLS 0471 1
of L 258
D
-0 C-
n s to CD CD
ID
-~i r o : CCD W
D m :3 m Q° a
c
o o 5 Z
o
m
z 3'
o
~ ~ ca
m
m
-G -G -f < C a o m
cn (n cn 0
y ~D
Q a
74 CD
In
p
N
d p o
rz,. W o
Q Z]
y o m
ca a
c 0 0 m o O
mn
co o z ~
0
M
o o. U)
- COD-
O a p o On
_ N01 ~ To
m <D z m
4A .69 ~ -69 -69 {69 ffl (A c. ~ m ~
CD z
X3 T
NT,
o QD C S n
W ID 0 =
Q. °c ° n
o O m. c
n p ~ n ,
CD
m X °
j
~ N
ch
Cl) M
z
z
0
m
z
N
I
ATTACH MENT# 3_Y._ 9-ORFPORT#L~,_0 /
259 _L_ of _0__
EGBERTS ENGINEERING LIMITED
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
3311 13ayview Avenue, Suite 106,
Willowdale, Ontario M2K 1C,4
Tel: (416)221-9969 Fax: (416)733-2198
SITE INSPECTION REPORT
PROJECT: East Shore Community Centre, 910 Liverpool Road, Pickering
DATE: July 5, 2010
PROJECT NO. 2010-100
REPORT NO.: 1
DISTRIBUTION: Soren Vaerum email vaerum@garlandeanada.com
STATUS:
1. The rooting was being replaced at this site at numerous different roof elevations. The
roof over the gymnasium is composed of Tectum acoustical decking placed over 36"
deep long span steel joists. The Tectum was noted as sagged adjacent to the high roof
to the west of the Gym and this area was left unroofed, while the remaining Tectum
roof deck was re-roofed..
2. The Tectum is 3" thick, unreinforced solid Tectum (ie no bonded insulation) based on a
core made by Garland (we did not. see the core). The depth was obtained by measuring
down alongside the deck, and not by a direct measure of a removed piece or against an
exposed edge.
COMMENTS:
1. There are two notably sagged or permanently deflected panels: one at the north west
corner of the roof, where the rooting has not been replaced, and also one 18 ft south of
the corner, immediately beside the high wall. The actual deflection was observed
visually from the floor below, and an accurate measurement would require ladder or
scaffold set-up below. However, when viewing the roof below, and using the steel
bridging as a straight line guide to view Tectum joints, almost all Tectum panels are
sagged. There is presently little weight on the root!
2. The Tectum panels in the exposed north west corner had a number of cuts through the
top surfacer in both directions across the panel. These are minimum '/4" deep and may
be deeper, and are spaced about 24 to 30" apart. They are likely saw-cuts made by
previous re-roof work, where the roofing was saw-cut to enable removals of the old
roof. These saw-cuts have permanently damaged and reduced the strength of the
Tectum panels.
Page 1
ATTACHMENT# 3 TO REPORT#66s 04
of 260
3. We have reviewed the average snow load required for this roof (25 pst), and the original
likely design snow load of 32 psf (Pickering was not a listed municipality 50 years ago,
so data for adjacent locations was likely used). We also reviewed manufacturer's
current load recommendations for both 3" and 2.5" Tectum (likely equivalent depth of a
damaged panel), with respect to the spans noted on site. The equivalent 2.5" (damaged)
depth does not have a listed load at. h ft span and this is also the limit of the spans listed
for this depth of Tectum, so any damage or deficiency would place the decking at the
limit. ofuseful or sate span for the product.
4. We also investigated whether Tectum had ever applied for or received a CCMC (a
division of NRC) product listing, making it an acceptable product under current
Building Code regulations, and there is NO Listing. A CCMC listing would review and
verify.manufacturer's claims of fitness and suitability for uses listed in their documents.
5. We recommend that the two excessively damaged panels be removed and replaced. As
discussed, the replacement may most efficiently be carried out with steel roof deck; 3"
deep x 0.030"zinc coated (Vicwcst RD308 or RD306); puddle weld to. the joists at 12"
c/c, with minimum 2" bearing on the roof joists.
6. We also have some concern that the entire roof is damaged and has less capacity than
originally built by at least 15%, based on a comparison of loading tables for 3" and 2.5"
thick "Tectum 1" panels at the typical span condition of 6 ft. The combined loading
(snow plus dead weight) required on the general roof area (ie not beside the high wall
where snow can be :higher) will be about 40 psf on the decking;. The design capacity of
the decking might be 25 to 30 psf when used over a 6 ft span however, no capacity is
listed at this span and any presumption of capacity may be unreasonable in any case.
This noted deficient capacity appears to be confirmed by the permanent sag of the
Tectum panels which we. observed on the site.
7. It is our recommendation that the roof be reinforced by adding steel sections
(channels or angles) between the steel joists, to reduce the span of the decking. The
arrangement of steel and sizing shall be confirmed and designed. Design should in our
view, take a conservative approach and reduce the Tectum spans to allow relatively high
local loading. Note that to carry out this reinforcement, the floor and walls need
temporary protection and a moveable scaffold wiI I need to be used for the steel
placement and welding, Given that the decking has a deformity, setting straight pieces
of steel under a curved deck will require some site adjustments to obtain fit. It may also
be advantageous to delay the placing of the ,,ravel ballast on the roof until after this
reinforcing is done. Painting of the roof will likely be required after the reinforcing is
done.
. r'
o cry
G. Egberts, P.Eng: t
EGBERTS ENGINES RING LIMITED 5 G.A.L. EGBERTS a
12943015
t.r
10
0
~90
y~ct of 06'
_.__-Page 2
ATTACHMENT# 3,._,,,.. TO REPORT#
261 of
777
y L
Photo 1 - view of north west corner of roof, with savv-cut cross-cut damage
! $ i ~ ^d. 'tom i
~ + t.
{ra'4~ ~ a SL ~ `C~3 f
Photo 2 - optional view of north west corner of roof
Page 3
-3 ~~S Old- ~
'fectttm Roof Deck Products-Tectum 1 ATTACFiMENT# TO REPORT# of~ http://wwtiv.Cectufn,con/tectunii.htln
62
{
LA 0
Roof Deck Products Search
TECTIIIA I Tectum I -
TECTIIM III
Producy..,;'iheet °ro)er„1 Pi!:tures Tr G^nnicai Qirta
TECTllM E .
Tectuni I is lypk;ely used In luw-sivpe appllwiiw ~S and peuvides a thermal Uanid, for lield- _
applied foam plastics. If Is comitallblewith virtually all roof installation materials. Underside c:D
woosed joints have attractive beveled edges LS (long span) panels are available with steel -
channel reinforcement. The Tectum I Roof Deck System consists of standard Tectum panels in 37 •s•„y _
either plank or the configurations.
TECTUM I Roof DECK PLANK AND LONG SPAN PLANK
Tectum Roof Plank with a T&G edge i5 available in all Tectum roof deck systems. Tectum Lang
Span Plank, available only in Tectum f panel, uses a 16-gaugn galvan+zeut slnal channel tnr j _ - _ - increased spans. These products are appfIcable to mat and pitched roots.
'
1 = Fcr qrc pbatnv f cal M t
r ease.e'n n prr}nct i Nn=
'Out,", Q online Complete wiry erlucaAion Class
for troth AIA and slate credit as
weA as qualityina for HSW cretlil.
JAI }
Tectum t Roof Plank
please rJiw,_P C . to bollin.
ROOF DECK TILE
Tectum Roof Deck Tile uses arty of the Tectum panels to span between steel toes or concrete
joists- The rabbeted edges of Tectum ilk rest on Steel lee ftlilge5 or on lop of concrete joists.
Spaces between file and tees, or the and anchors in concrete joists. are filled with Tectum grout
for excellent anchorage and wind uplift resistance. Custom lengths allow roof design with no
e7posed end joints.
Tectum I Roof Tile
TECTUM I -CTD (Concealed Tee Deck)
The Teclum I - CTO (Concealed Tee Deck) system uses a Y-thick Tectum I panel kerfed to
accept a manmum size #218 bulb tee. The flanges of the steel tee are concealed in the body of
the Tectum panel, The Te lum CTD system allows spans up to 10' without visible edge support.
~ ~ S
Y T
Tectum I CTD
TECTUM ROOF DECK - LIGHTWEIGHT INSULATING CONCRETE
The Teclum Roof Deck - UMC System uses Teclum roof plank and the to provide a unique and
structural substrate for LWIC (Lightweight Insulating Concrete) topping. This system can be used
over steel or wood structural systems, The porous nature of Tectum decks allows the LVYIC to
dry from the underside of the L WIC slurry The result is a structural, acoustical deck with
permanent insulation. The deck can be rerooled without costly replacement and disposal of the
enstinO insulation.
This roof deck system has proven to be tong lasting and economical for flat and low-slope roof
decks. I is an idoal Wuhan in aroat whom higher allowable shear value is are required.
CODE LISTINGS
• ICC-E.S Evaluation RepOr7 (FSR-.1712)
• MBCI (Construclion No, 451)
,,o,ta. s !Qyuior 1 Rr <rt. ()7:k r_E0 l SpccifrCationy I C?raorngs I i_uerature I £tu11C~?ns, Nr,•ws FAQI, I Sarrpint ( Hnny) Since 1949
Tectum inc., PR So. 3002, W-k, OH 47058 • 888977.9691 • 740-}45.9691
Copoghte 2010
1 of 1 06/07/2010 5:32 PM
ATTACHMENT# TO REPORT#6&S 64-0
a
963 of ,
The Noise Control Solution
TECTUM ROOF DECK DESIGN GUIDELINES
DESIGN LOAD DATA**
System Thickness*** Wt. fpsf)*** Product 24" 30" 36" 38" 40" 42" 44" 48" 50" 52" 54" 60" 66" 72"
Plank 2" 3.5 1 130 75 50 45 40 35
2W' 4.5 1 150 120 80 70 60 50 45 35
3" 5.3 1 200 125 102 91 82 74 65 50 45 40 35- 1
Long Span Plank, 2" 3.8 1 130 75 75 75 70 64 57 50 45 40 35 r
-ii 2y" 4.7 1 150 120 120 120 114 103 93 77 70 65 60 SO 35 44
-i► 3" 5.5 1 200 125 125 125 125 120 1,15 110 104 96 88 71 58 50
All pubWished design loads are based on minimum safety factor of four. For example, SO psf design load has an ultimate load of 200 psf.
'Thickness and weight are nominal. For loads greater than 200 lbs., contact Tectum Inc. Technical Department
f E t 3 ° ft"f>~
'I
www.tectum.com 888-977-9691 Phone 800-832-8869 Fax Email: info@tectum.com
ATTACHMENT# 3 TO REPORT# S 614
264
HIGHER ROOF - 46" ABOVE GYM ROOF
16'-10"
NEW' R OF D CK .
13' X 17 FT NEW ROOF DECK
i
REMOVE TECTUM DECK & PLACE
VICWEST 3" X 0,030 RD308 OR 3 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NEW GALV STEEL ROOF" DECK
WELD TO JOISTS ® 12" C/C AND
PROVIDE MIN 2" BEARING ON STEE
6'
I
w
w g
S
o:
z 0 a 0
r
tO ~ ~ w w
aor
PROJECT: EGBERTS ENGINEERING LIMITED
EAST SHORE COMMUNITY CENTRE OQPOfESSIpNq~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS.
F~ 3311 BAWEW AVE. SUET 106
910 LIVERPOOL ROAD, PICKERING TE~ 416) 221°-996'9
G. EGBER DRAWN BY. JOB. NO.
G.A. L. E. 2010-100
TITLE; 301
CHECKED BY: DWG. NO.
PART ROOF FRAMING REPAIR DECK 10 P~v SCALE 1~B"=I'-0"
~c 0 DATE: JULY 2010 IS K - 1
ATTACH MENT# TO REPORT#
265
c.,
It I
A tt
.Z "
t
A I~
IV,
PROJECT: EGBERTS ENGINEERING LIMITED
~~s ss,o~CONSULTING ENGINEERS.
EAST SHORE COMMUNITY CENTRE
< 3311 BAYVIEW AVE. SURF 106
(U ri WiLLOWDALE. ONTARIO
910 LIVERPOOL ROAD. PICKERING TEL (416) 221-9969
G.A.L. EG'BERTS Wrt BY: J08. NO.
G.A. L E. 2010-100
TITLE: 12~: 3' 1F iECKEa BY: DWG. NO.
DECK BEARING G._L _E
SCALE; 1j8.,_1,-0.,
~'A F r;' - DAVE: JULY 2010 S K 2
ATTACHMENT# TO REPORT# X54 ~
266
I
s
s ~
4 N
V)
f tYM ear
I
PROJECT: ~EGBERTS ENGINEERING LIMITED
EAST SHORE COMMUNITY CENTRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS
3311 BAYVIEW AVE. SUIT 106
WILLOWDALE, ONTARIO
910 LIVERPOOL ROAD, PICKERING TE7_.(416) 221-.a464
DRAWN BY: JOB. NO.
TITLE: GA. L. E. 2010-100
CHECKED BY:
HVAC UNIT SUPPORT G.A.L.E DING. NQ.
scALE: 1/8"=V-0"
DATE: K 3
JULY 2010
ATTACH MENT#~_ TO REPORT#~ou ^f ~
of ~
2 6 7 The Corporation of the City of Pickering
By-law No.
Being a by-law to authorize the Roof
Reinforcement at East Shore Community
Centre in the City of Pickering and the
issuance of debentures therefor in the
amount of $150,000.
Whereas Section 11 of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, provides that a lower-tier
municipality may pass by-laws respecting matters within the spheres of jurisdiction
described in that Section; and,
Whereas Subsection 401(1) of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, provides that a
municipality may incur a debt for municipal purposes, whether by borrowing money or in
any other way; and,
Whereas Subsection 401(3) of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, provides that a
lower-tier municipality in a regional municipality does not have the power to issue
debentures; and,
Whereas The Regional Municipality of Durham has the sole authority to issue
debentures for the purposes of its lower-tier municipalities including The Corporation of
the City of Pickering (the "City"); and,
Whereas the Council of the City wishes to proceed with the Roof Reinforcement at East
Shore Community Centre project; and,
Whereas before the Council of the City authorized the Roof Reinforcement at East
Shore Community Centre project, the Council of the City had the Treasurer update the
City's Annual Repayment Limit, the Treasurer calculated the estimated annual amount
payable in respect of such project and determined that such annual amount would not
cause the City to exceed the updated limit and, therefore, Ontario Municipal Board
approval was not required prior to City Council's authorization as per .Section 401 of the
Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, and the regulations made thereunder;
And whereas after determining that Ontario Municipal Board approval is not required,
the Council of the City approved Report OES 04-11 on the date hereof and awarded
Tender T-25-2010 for the Roof Reinforcement at East Shore Community Centre
project.
ATTACHNFNT# Z 70REPORT#
2L of 1?1 268
By-law No. Page 2
Now therefore the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as
follows:
1. That the City proceed with the project referred to as "Roof Reinforcement at East
Shore Community Centre";
2: That the estimated costs of the project in the amount of $153,658 be financed as
follows:
a) That the sum of $150,000 be financed by the issue of debentures by The
Regional Municipality of Durham over a period not to exceed ten (10) years;
b) That the sum of $3,658 be funded from Current Funds;
3. That the funds to repay the principal and interest of the debentures be provided for
in the annual Current Budget for the City commencing in 2011 and continuing
thereafter until the loan is repaid.
By-law read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17th day of January,
2011.
David Ryan, Mayor
Debbie Shields, City Clerk