Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJanuary 4, 2011 CLryo¢ Planning & Development Committee Agenda _ Tuesday, January 4, 2011 PICKERING Council Chambers 7:30 pm Chair: Councillor Ashe Part "A" Pages Planning Information Meeting Information Report No. 01 -11 Subject: Zoning IBy-law Amendment - A 7/10 1-24 Pickering-Brock Centre Inc. 1755-1805 Pickering Parkway & 1842 Notion Road (Concession 1 South Part Lot 17, 18 Now 40R-20443 Part 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11) City of Pickering Information Report No. 02-11 Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 6/10 25-38 C. Bollmann 3325 Highway 7, Kinsale (North Part Lot 2, Concession 5) City of Pickering Information Report No. 03-11 Subject: Zoning Amendment Application A 8/10 39-45 P. Albanese 1448 Rougemount Drive (Part of Lot 16, Plan 228) City of Pickering Accessible For information related to accessibility requirements please contact PICKS N Linda Roberts Phone: 905.420.4660 extension 2928 TTY: 905.420.1739 Email: Iroberts(cDcitvofpickerina.com Ctq o0 Planning & Development Committee Agenda _ Tuesday, January 4, 2011 PICKERIft Council Chambers 7:30 pm Chair: Councillor Ashe Information Report No. 04-11 Subject: Zoning Amendment Application A 9/10 46-51 M. Rajadurai 1975 Guild Road (Lots 36 and 37, Plan 316) City of Pickering Part "B" Planning & Development Reports 1. Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 01-11 52-70 Proposed Wireless Cell Tower Installation Rogers Wireless 5025 Sideline 8 (Part of Lot 7 &.8, Concession 9) City of Pickering Recommendation 1. That Report 01-11 of the Director, Planning & Development be received; 2. That Rogers Wireless be advised that City Council has no objection to the proposed 60 metre high cell tower installation at 5025 Sideline 8; and 3. Further, that the City Clerk advise Rogers Wireless accordingly. 2. Director, Planning & Development, Report PD 02-11 71-96 Proposed Demolition of Listed Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Recommendation 1. That Report P.D 02-11 of the Director, Planning & Development respecting . the proposed demolition by Transport Canada of nine structures listed on the Heritage Register, be received for information; 2. That the Federal Minister of Transportation be advised that the City of Pickering is concerned about the destruction of cultural heritage resources on the Pickering Lands Site; Citq o4 Planning & Development Committee Agenda _ Tuesday, January 4, 2011 PICKERING Council Chambers 7:30 pm Chair: Councillor Ashe 3. That the Federal Minister of Transportation be requested to refrain from demolishing seven listed structures of heritage value, and particularly the two structures at 635 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road and 5245 Sideline 28 noted within this report as having a high level of cultural heritage significance, until a decision regarding future plans for the Pickering Lands Site has been made and the potential for preservation of these structures can be fully considered; 4. That the Federal Minister of Transportation be requested to fully reimburse the City for its costs to undertake detailed heritage assessments of the nine buildings which are the subject of this report, and to fund future assessments required for the additional (100) buildings identified on the City of Pickering Heritage Register that are located on the Pickering Lands Site; 5. That Transport Canada be asked to reconvene the Local Heritage Steering Committee to complete its mandate to develop a heritage strategy for buildings deemed locally significant; and 6. Further, that the City Clerk forward a copy of Report PD 02-11 and resolution to the Federal Minister of Transportation, the Regional Director, Programs and Pickering Lands Branch, Transport Canada, the Region of Durham, the Region of York, the Towns of Markham and Uxbridge, MP Mark Holland and MPP Joe Dickson and the MPs and MPPs for Markham and Uxbridge (II) Other Business (III) Adjournment e``q Information Report Report Number: 01-11 PICKERING For Public Information Meeting of Date: January 4, 2011 01 In Accordance with the Public Meeting Requirements of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13 Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment - A 7/10 Pickering -Brock Centre Inc. 1755-1805 Pickering Parkway &.1842 Notion Road (Concession 1 South Part Lot 17, 18 Now 40R-20443 Part 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11) City of Pickering 1.0 Property Location and Description • the subject lands are located immediately north of Highway 401, on the east side of Brock Road (see Location Map - Attachment #1) • the site is irregular in shape and has a total area of 13.07 hectares; The Shops at Pickering Ridge (formally Pickering Home and Leisure Centre) occupy approximately 9.5 hectares of the site and the remaining 3.57 hectares are vacant • a private stormwater facility and associated vegetation are located within the vacant portion of the lands • access to the shopping centre is from Brock Road and Pickering Parkway • the surrounding land uses are: north Canadian Tire store; Walmart store, detached dwellings and vacant lands on the north side of Pickering Parkway south - Highway 401 west - apartment buildings and retirement home on the west side of Brock Road east - a cemetery on the east side of Notion Road in the Town of Ajax 2.0 Applicant's Proposal • the applicant is proposing to amend the zoning by-law to permit a 9,230 square metre expansion of the shopping centre consisting of both stand-alone and multiple tenant buildings (see Applicant's Submitted Plan - Attachment #2) the proposal includes the demolition of one of the four existing retail commercial buildings and the addition of seven new buildings for a total of ten buildings and a total gross floor area of 35,820 square metres • the stormwater pond is proposed to be relocated to the eastern limit of the subject site Information Report No. 01-11 Page 2 02 in addition to the three existing access driveways (two off Pickering Parkway and one off Brock Road), two new driveways are proposed off Pickering Parkway (one opposite Beechlawn Drive and the other opposite Marshcourt Drive) • a total of 1,508 parking spaces are proposed for the entire development which represents a parking standard of 4.2 spaces per 100 square metres gross floor leasable area (gfla). A minimum of 1,000 parking spaces are currently required on the site which represents a parking standard of 3.75 spaces per 100 square metres glfa. The City of Pickering's typical parking ratio is 4.5 spaces per 100 metres glfa • the proposal also includes: • the addition of a food store use having a minimum floor area of 4,515 square metres increasing the maximum aggregate floor area to 7,000 square metres for retail stores between 100 square metres and 900 square metres in size • decreasing the minimum unit size for a retail store from 1,400 square metres to 929 square metres and • increasing the maximum aggregate floor area for all restaurants - Type A to 3,000 square metres 3.0 Official Plan and Zoning 3.1 Durham Regional Official Plan • the Regional Plan designates the subject property "Living Area" • the predominant use of lands designated in "Living Areas" is to be housing but limited retailing of goods and services in appropriate locations may also be permitted • the Plan also states that Living Areas shall be developed in a compact form through higher densities and by intensifying and redeveloping existing areas, particularly along arterial roads • portions of the subject lands are identified as containing a "Key Natural Heritage and/or Hydrologic Feature" requiring that any proposal for development or site alteration shall demonstrate that there will be no negative effects on key natural heritage or hydrologic features or their functions (the status of the key feature(s) requires confirmation) • the subject property abuts Pickering Parkway and Notion Road, which are both designated as Type C Arterial Roads, and Brock Road, which is designated as a Type A Arterial Road • Brock Road is also designated as a Transit Spine where adjacent development is to provide for complementary higher density uses and buildings oriented towards the street • the proposal appears to comply with the Durham Regional Official Plan Information Report, No. 01-11 Page 3 03 3.2 Pickering Official Plan. • the City of Pickering Official Plan designates the subject lands as "Mixed Use Areas- Specialty Retailing Node" • permissible uses within the "Mixed Use Areas - Specialty Retailing Node" designation include, among others, special purpose commercial uses such as large format retailers (including large format food stores and large format discount stores), theme and/or specialty retailers, ancillary retailing of other goods and services including restaurants, and limited offices • a potential Underpass/Overpass is indicated on Schedule II - Transportation System connecting Notion Road with Squires Beach Road south of Highway 401 • the subject lands are within the Village East Neighbourhood of the Official Plan • Council has adopted the Specialty Retailing Node Development Guidelines for lands at the northeast corner of the Highway 401/Brock Road interchange which includes the subject lands as well as the First Simcha Shopping Centre lands located to the north • the proposal will be assessed against the policies and provisions of the Pickering Official Plan during the further processing of the application 3.3 Specialty Retailing Node Development Guidelines. • the Specialty Retailing Development Guidelines adopted by City Council in 1999 establish guiding principles to assist Council in the review of development proposals and the preparation of zoning by-laws in this area • notable urban design objectives stated in the Guidelines include: • the creation of cohesive and unified development which fits the surrounding context through an appropriate mix of uses, massing, scale and architectural detailing • attention to the public realm through building placement and the treatment of spaces between buildings • accommodation of both pedestrians and vehicle traffic, and • siting and designing building within g g n development blocks that are capable of adapting overtime • through the rezoning and site plan approval process the proposal will be reviewed with regard to the principles contained within the Specialty Retailing Development Guidelines 3.4 Zoning By-law 3036 • the lands currently occupied by the shopping centre are zoned "MU-SRN-1" - Mixed Use Specialty Retailing Node One in Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 6549/05, which permits a range of commercial and office uses • the vacant portion of the site is zoned "M1" - Storage & Light Industrial by By-law 3036 • the proposal is to amend the zoning by-law to extend the "MU-SRN-1" zone over the entire site to permit the expansion of the shopping centre as described in Section 2.0 Information Report No. 01-11 Page 4 04 4.0 Results of Circulation 4.1 Resident Comments • none received to date 4.2 Agency Comments • the following. agencies have no objection to the application subject to certain conditions (see Attachments #3, #4 & #5) • Region of Durham • Ministry of Transportation • Town of Ajax 4.3 City Department Comments • the following departments have no objections to the application subject to certain conditions (see Attachments #6 to #9) • Development Control • Engineering Services and Operations & Facilities • Engineering Services, Transportation Engineer • Engineering Services, Senior Water Resources & Environmental Engineer 4.4 Staff Comments • in reviewing the application to date, the following matters have been identified by staff for further review and consideration: • the functional layout and internal pedestrian/vehicular circulation of the proposed development, including parking requirement and layout, ingress/egress, pedestrian accessibility, traffic generation and patterns, streetscape and landscaped areas and features • the compatibility of the proposed development with the existing adjacent residential area • consistency with the Specialty Retailing Node Development Guidelines • the future Notion Road overpass and how it may affect the proposed entrance opposite Marshcourt Drive; the proposed relocation of the stormwater management pond to the northeast corner of the subject site, the current alignments of Pickering Parkway and Notion Road, and the extent and limit of the widening of Notion Road • Toronto Region Conservation Authority approval of the stormwater management plan • a new Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment is required for the entire subject lands • evaluation of the plan's sustainable development components Information Report No. 01-11 Page 5 05 5.0 Procedural Information • written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning & Development Department • oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting • all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Council or a Committee of Council • any member of the public who wish to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this proposal • any member of the public who wish to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal must request such in writing to the City Clerk 6.0 Other Information 6.1 Appendix No. I • list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City Departments that have commented on the application at the time of writing the report 6.2 Information Received • copies of the plans and studies listed below are available for viewing at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department: • Archaeological Assessment (Stages 1 & 2) prepared by Archaeologix Inc., dated July 2007 • Planning Justification Letter prepared by Zelinka Priamo Ltd., dated June 22, 2010 • Sustainability Development Report prepared by Zelinka Priamo Ltd., dated July 9, 2010 • Market Analysis prepared by urbanMetrics Inc., dated March 10, 2010 • Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment - Pickering Annex, Final Report prepared by Jacques Whitford, dated January 24, 2006 • Environmental Report, 1842-1856 Notion Road prepared by Beacon Environmental, dated April 2008 • Stormwater Management Report prepared by Sernas Associates, dated October 2007 • Urban Design Brief prepared by Turner Fleischer & Ron Koudys, Landscape Architect, dated June 23, 2010 0 Traffic Impact Study prepared by LEA Consulting Ltd., dated July 2010 Information Report No. 01-11 Page 6 U 6.3 Company Principal • Frank Guiliani is the contact at Pickering - Brock Centre Inc. • Harry Froussios of Zelinka Priamo Ltd. is the authorized agent for Pickering - Brock Centre Inc. k~ Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Marg Wouters, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner - Policy Manager, Development Review & Urban Design DWAd Attachments Copy: Director, Planning & Development Appendix No. I to Information Report No. 01-11 07 Commenting Residents and Landowners (1) none received to date Commenting Agencies (1) Region of Durham (2) Ministry of Transportation (3) Town of Ajax Commenting City Departments (1) Development Control (2) Engineering Services and Operations & Facilities (3) Engineering Services, Transportation Engineer (4) Engineering Services, Senior Water Resources & Environmental Engineer ATTACHMENT'#~.,,TQ 0 8 iNFOR" ATIO REPoRro 0f o ~ i Q Z i w w O COURT ~ ; a C ~ v L 1 C o ; EECHLAW 1 1 Y ~ 1 v DRIVE o PARK y 70 m = O TI = O N o ~ z 1 g 1'. C N w i m i COURT DRIVE 1 1 1 PICKERING PARKWAY 1 1 1 L 1 SU 1 0 PROPERTY 1 1 1 40~ 1 1 N~GNW P~ 0 a O City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Concession 1, South Part of Lot 17, 18, 40R-20443, Parts 1, 31 5-11 OWNER Pickering Brock Centre Inc. DATE Sept 9, 2010 DRAWN BY JB FILE No. A 007/10 SCALE 1:5000 CHECKED BY DW H oTeranet Enterprlaea Inc. and Ita uppllere. All rlphta Reserved: Not a plan oT au?vey. PN-9 2005 MPAC and its • II•Ie. All rl ht• Reserved. Not a Ian of Surve . ATTACHMENTO' O tf o ~o nc~ om ` f f r \ ma ~ n _ ~ \ d c ~I II 1111111 - of ° - vl ~ a ou \1.s. Q ~"Iflll Ili li ~ u m Kgc~ 1 a U ° ¢VIIII~~/ 1 //nn `oz EY . In 5 r I CIA Z U c m $ I II 1 lel U aag~ \ L 0 a o yI sa 7z E {s~ VIII 1 - E a c I I 11111'1 Imo' nc I I ~'Tl~ffllll I III!1 ~ ~ M m a zai W ~ o IpI1II41TTilUp - a\ 7 fA m ll II .i I TAD a\F`y' L O gE6ry\/AVNON~E by - ~ E \ ~ O . ya1 "Q UT TIIII ITT 1T I° xLL II Il fHllt W M a . I I Ili L z \ OE ~ ~ Ullli I II~V~ ~ _ 1a 11'1\ •Q 0 Il N =1 Q , 1 U ~ I 11 1 ~ 1 O ,C - - Ioy~~~ \ Rf ' ~ ~ lad§ i'I I i p7 _ - nl II1111~4 ill I`tai' • 1ul 1 f T I i I I IIII Iilllillll~U° \ I .s IIII I . ~ ./1~ 3 a ee ;a I IIPIIIIIT 7 \ 7 7 VTIT~D P ~ -.in I I I I,i9~ ~ - - sE Xx I • Ili < e ATl'ACHMEN7' C"I'To October 14, 2010 Deborah Wylie, Senior Planner - Policy R E C G I V G D Planning & Development Department 5 2010 City of Pickering O CT • One The Esplanade OF ptCKER1t4G Pickering ON L1 V 6K7 CI Ty & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Dear Ms. Wylie: The Regional Municipality Re: Zoning Amendment Application A07110 of Durham Applicant: Pickering Brock Centre Inc. Planning Department Location: 1755 & 1805 Pickering Parkway, 1856 -1842 Notion Road 605 O55LAND ROAD E 4` FLOOR South Part of Lot 17 &18, Concession 1 PO BOX 623 Municipality: City of Pickering WHITBY ON Ll N 6A3 CANADA 905-668-7711 The Regional Municipality of Durham (The Region) has reviewed the above" Fax: 905-666-6208 noted application and offers the following comments for your consideration. Email: plan ning@durham. ca www.durham.ca The purpose of this application is to amend the zoning by-law on the subject lands to permit the expansion of an existing shopping centre with additional A.L. Georgieff, MCIP, RPP commercial uses. The expansion includes the reconfiguration of one existing Commissioner of Planning building and the addition of several new buildings, both in the existing developed portion of the lands and in the vacant portion. Regional Official Plan The subject lands are currently designated `Living Area' in the Durham Region Official Plan (ROP). The ROP states that Living Areas shall be used predominantly for housing purposes. The ROP also states that limited retailing of goods and services, in appropriate locations, may be permitted in Living Areas, and states that Living Areas shall be developed in a compact form through higher densities and by intensifying and redeveloping existing areas, particularly along arterial roads. Portions of the subject lands are identified as containing a "Key Natural Heritage and/or Hydrologic Feature", as per Schedule B - Map B1d in the ROP. The ROP states that any proposal for development or site alteration shall demonstrate that there will be no negative effects on key natural heritage or hydrologic features or their functions. A Scoped Environmental Impact Study, prepared by Beacon Environmental and dated April 2008, was submitted with this application. The report concludes that the proposed development would result in the loss of small areas of woodland, marsh wetland and cultural meadow on the subject property. The report also states that mitigation measures have been identified that support the City of Pickering Design with Nature policies. It is suggested that the City of Pickering obtain comments from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority regarding the study. "Service Excellence -for our Communities" 0 100% Pos± Consumer IN 211 Page 2 The subject property abuts Pickering Parkway and Notion Road, which are both designated as Type 'C' Arterial Roads, and Brock Road, which is designated as a Type 'A' Arterial Road; in the ROP. Brock Road is also designated as a Transit Spine in the Durham ROP. Development adjacent to Transit Spines shall provide for complementary higher density uses and buildings oriented towards the street. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Region's policies stated above. Provincial Policies & Delegated Review Responsibilities This application has been screened in accordance with the terms of the provincial plan review responsibilities. i Potential Site Contamination A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), dated January 24, 2006 and prepared by Jacques Whitford Inc,, was submitted with this application, despite the fact that the Screening Questionnaire for Identifying Potentially Contaminated Sites did not identify any potential contaminants. The report concluded that there was no evidence of potential environmental contamination associated with the subject site. The scope of the above ESA, however, included only the developed portion of the subject lands with the civic address of 1755 & 1805 Pickering Parkway. It did not include the undeveloped portion of the subject site with the civic address of 1856 -1842 Notion Road. Further, the Archaeological Assessment detailed below identified that the undeveloped portion of the subject property contained industrial fill, including one industrial building foundation and some shed debris, as well as soil full of old tires. Due to the age of the above ESA, and the contradictory information provided by the Site Screening Questionnaire and the Archaeological Assessment report, the Region requires that a new Phase I ESA be completed for the entire subject lands covering the municipal addresses of 1755 & 1805 Pickering Parkway, and 1856 - 1842 Notion Road. Also, in accordance with Regional procedures, a Reliance Agreement Letter and Certificate of Insurance are to be submitted with all Phase 1 ESAs and prior to the Region relying on the information. Archaeological Potential A Stage 1 and 2 Archaeological Assessment report, dated July 2007 and prepared by Archaeologix Inc., was submitted with this application. The scope of this report included the undeveloped portion of the subject lands, but not the developed portion. This report found no archaeological resources, and has been filed with the Ontario Ministry of Culture for their review and acceptance. Regional Services Municipal water supply and sanitary sewer service are available to the subject property. The Regional Works Department has no objection to the above application. ATTArI4A'F # _ Page 3 " Durham Region Transit & Transportation Durham Region Transit (DRT) operates two bus routes, the 108 and 122 services, on Pickering Parkway in the vicinity of the subject property. A bus stop is currently located on the south side of Pickering Parkway, where the proposed major access to the site will be located. As a result, DRT will relocate the bus stop approximately 20 metres to the west of the current location. The new bus stop should include a hard surface adjacent to the roadway, a transit shelter and a hard surface connection to the sidewalk along the south side of Pickering Parkway. When the current bus stop needs to be relocated, it is suggested that an on-site meeting be held between appropriate Pickering and DIRT staff to finalize the new bus stop location. Please contact David Perkins at 905-668-4113 ext. 2571 should you have any questions or require additional information. Yours truly, d r Vannit a Chanthavong, MCIP, RPP Planner Current Planning cc: Regional Works Department - Pete Castellan Durham Region Transportation Planning - Amjad Gauhar Durham Region Transit - Martin Ward ATTAGHV T#1 Ito FF0FVAT?C~: t~► r~T#.- 3 /o 1 Ministry of Transportation Ministdre des Transports r~0 Central Region Region du Centre 7N Corridor Management Section Section de gestion des couloire rculiers • Floor, Bldg. D 7°etage, edirwo D i 1201 Wilson Avenue 1201, avenue Wilson Ontario Downsview, ON M31VI 1J8 Downsview, ON M3M 1J8 Tel.: 416-235- T81.: 416-235- Fax.: 416-235-1267 Te1ec.: 416.2354267 September 22, 2010 Deborah Wylie, Senior Planner Planning and Development Department. City of Pickering Pickering Civic Complex One The Esplanade Pickering, Ontario L1V 6K7 Re: Zoning By-law Amendment Application Pickering-Brock Centre 1755 & 1805 Pickering Parkway & 1842-1856 Notion Road Concession 1, Part Lot 17, 18 Highway 401, City of Pickering, Region of Durham Dear Ms. Wylie: The ministry has completed its review of the above Zoning By-law Amendment Application and offers the following comments. The applicant should be made aware that Ministry building/land-use permits are required prior to any grading or construction taking place on these lands that are within the Ministry' Permit Control. This Ministry will require a minimum 14m setback from the Highway 401 right-of-way to any new buildings/structures above and below ground. Further, any feature deemed essential to the operation and viability of the site (including parking spaces required by municipal by-law, fire routes, driveway aisles, loading docks and access to loading docks, garbage access, underground structures, municipally assumed/private roads and/or servicing, stormwater management pond access roadway, etc.) must be setback a minimum of 14 metres from the Highway 401 right-of-way. The driveway aisle shown immediately adjacent to the Highway 401 Right-of-Way in this proposal within the 14m setback, should be relocated outside the 14m setback if it is essential to the operation and viability of this development. Stormwater Mangement Facilities,, such as the stormwater pond access, should also be located outside the 14m setback. Any parking shown within the 14m setback must be surplus to the site requirements and so noted on the Site Plan. In general, the applicant should be made aware that no direct access shall be permitted to Highway 401. All access shall be via the existing internal municipal streets. As part of the permit application process, prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant will be required to submit a Traffic Impact Study indicating the existing and future projected traffic volumes and pattems as it impacts the Highway 401 and Brock Road Interchange, for this Ministry's review and approval. The applicant will also be required to submit full scale (1:500) site plans, site servicing and grading plans and detailed storm-water management plans and reports indicating the changes in drainage run-off caused by the developments, and the intended treatment of this calculated runoff as it impacts on the Highway 401 Right-of-way, for this Ministry's review and approval. Illumination Plans and details will also need to be reviewed and approved by this ministry. All Plans should dearly show the Highway 401 ATWHN, WWO-4-S-0 lNFC' ATE ' P ' Right-of-Way and the 14m setback. The Ministry will provide more detailed comments when a formal site plan is submitted. Further information on our Building and Land Use Permit requirements is available from our office by contacting Mr. Ken Sherbanowski, Permits Officer (416-235-5560) at the above-captioned address. Sign permits may be required as well. Yours Truly, Graham D. Routledge (416) 235-4256 Corridor Management Technician ATTAG9 15 November 2nd, 2010 City of Pickering Planning & Development Department One The Esplanade Pickering, Ontario, Canada L1V 6K7 Attention: Deborah Wylie RE: The Shops at Pickering Ridge (Proposed Expansion) Town staff have reviewed the application and supporting documentation for The Shops at Pickering Ridge expansion proposal. Our Engineering Department had the following comments: 1) The consulting engineer for the owner must ensure they are using the most current regional flood model for this area of Duffins Creek. The consultant must contact TRCA to verify. 2) The displacement of the regional flood plain as described in section 3.1 of the stormwater management report must reviewed and approved by the TRCA. 3) In section 2.2 and 4.2.3 of the SWM report the existing storm sewer was designed for the minor event only (based on Appendix B). The major event would be overland. 4) Section 4.2.3 of the SWM report should reference section 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1.1 for floodplain management. Quantity control is required for displacement of the regional storm volume. 5) Table 1.1 should be revised to include the regional event. 6) Please forward TRCA comments. Please note that a portion of this development maybe within the Regional Flood Plain. Please verify with TRCA for regional flood limits. Landforms have been established in the Town of Ajax and the City of Pickering in this area to help with the management of regional storm events. 1 W#4, 16 INFORMA-P Any negative disturbance in this sensitive flood management balance could create future private and public property damage due to flooding during a regional event. Overall, Town of Ajax Planning Staff have no significant objection to the proposed expansion of the shopping centre. However, this expansion will inevitably result in increase traffic along Notion .Road and therefore the Town would like to see the condition of Notion Rd. improvement from the intersection of'.Notion Rd. and Pickering Parkway south to the dead end. We have attached pictures of the current road condition for your information. Town of Ajax staff would like to thank you for the opportunity to review The Shops at Pickering Ridge expansion proposal and we would appreciate being kept apprised of future developments with this project, especially regarding Notion Rd. Sincerely, J Edward Terry, Policy Planner. Town of Ajax, Planning and Development Services T: 905.619.2529 x3234 I F: 905.686.0360 E: Edward. terrya-townofaiax.com - fi ~ 17 • y • . ~ a om ! , ea..n I,t i ~ t 1 r ~ tt ~t t ' rs _ t k ~f 1 - 1 - is m ~ d , ra. s a _ a cy) S P p i WN. ~ Tt i Q 03 y a e rr~, , i CO } a y, co z ATT'Af City o~ PICKERING memo To: Deborah Wylie November 2, 2010 Senior Planner - Policy From: Robert Starr Manager, Development Control Copy: Inspector, Development Control Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A07/10 Pickering-Brock Centre 1755 & 1805 Pickering Parkway & 1842-1856 Notion Road (Concession 1 South Part Lot 17, 18 Now 4013-20443 Part 1, 3, 5-11) City of Pickering We have reviewed the latest submission for the above-mentioned application and our comments are as follows: Property Survey by Speight, Van Nostrand & Gibson Limited, dated May 29, 2005 1. No specific comments. Site Plan by Turner Fleischer dated April 15, 2010 1. No specific comments. Environmental Report, 1842=1856 Notion Road by Beacon Environmental dated April 2008 1. Ensure that notes as stated in Section 11.1 Monitoring are included on the engineering plans provided for Site Plan Application. Final Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment - Pickering Annex by Jacques Whitford, dated January, 24, 2006 1. No specific comments. Traffic Impact Study by LEA Consulting Ltd., dated July 2010 1. Based on the recommendations presented in Section 7.0 Conclusions, a Line Painting Plan will be required at the Site Plan Submission stage. 2. This report should address the possible Notion Road overpass and how it may affect the entrance opposite Marshcourt Drive. I J 2 Traffic Impact Study cont'd. 3. The proposed overpass could potentially impact the location of the stormwater management pond. Notion Road will be required to be widened. 4. The overpass may have an impact on the current alignment of Pickering Parkway. The length of the overpass should be examined to determine the exact location of the north limit of the required works. Sustainability Development Report by Zelinko Priamo Ltd., dated July 9, 2010 1. No specific comments. Site Grading Plan by Sernas Associates, dated March 2009, Revised March 2010 1. No specific comments. Site Servicing Plan by Sernas Associates, dated March 2009, Revised March 2010 1. A detail of the connection to the storm sewer on Pickering Parkway will be required at Site Plan Submission stage. Construction Management and Erosion/Sediment Control Plan by Sernas Associates, dated August 2007, Revised 09/12/2007 1. Although this plan was previously approved with the permit FB 01-2008, the overall Stormwater Management Pond footprint and proposed layout have changed considerably. Revise as required for the Site Plan Submission. 2. See Comment #1 under Environmental Report above. Drainage Area Plan by Sernas Associates, dated March 2009, Revised March 2010 1. No specific comments. Stormwater Management Report by Sernas Associates, dated October 2007 1. This report was originally submitted for the Fill Permit. Ensure that the new pond design conforms to this report.. Please note that more detailed comments will be provided on the engineering plans during the Site Plan Approval process. RS/Imc November 2, 2010 Page 2 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A07/10 21 OPERATIONS & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION MEMORANDUM September 30, 2010 To: Richard Holborn, P. Eng. Division Head, Engineering Services From: Site Plan Review Committee Engineering Services and Operations & Facilities Subject: Application for Zoning By-law Amendment A07/10 - 1st Submission Pickering - Brock Centre Inc. 1755-1805 Pickering Parkway City of Pickering The site plan review committee with representatives from both Engineering Services and Operations & Facilities Divisions, have met to review the above noted request and provide the following comments. General Comments 1. There are no comments at this time for the zoning amendment. SB:sb Copy: Supervisor, Engineering & Capital Works fit 4 2 2 A _ PICKERING MEMO To: Deborah Wylie November 12, 2010 Senior Planner - Policy From: Dhaval Pandya, M.Eng. Coordinator, Transportation Engineering Copy: Division Head, Engineering Services Supervisor, Engineering & Capital Works Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 07/10 Pickering-Brock centre 1755 & 1805 Pickering Parkway & 1842-1856 Notion Road (Concession 1 South Part Lot 17, 18 Now 40R-20443 Part 1, 3, 5-11) City of Pickering Please be advised that the Transportation Engineering Staff has reviewed the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Lea Consulting Limited, dated July 2010. Our comments related to Transportation Engineering include the following:- • The Traffic Impact Study indicates that two full access driveways will be provided on Pickering Parkway; however there is no mention of dimensions for spacing of the access/driveway on the site plan. It needs to be labelled. • The Traffic Impact Study Report does not address transportation effects due to proposed Notion Road Overpass on both Notion Road and Pickering Parkway and its implications (if any) associated to the proposed development on the subject roads. This needs to be addressed in detail. • The Traffic Impact Study indicates that all outbound movements from the proposed development will be under stop control. It is suggested to plot the same information either on the site plan or on separate future/proposed lane configuration sheet. • The study report does not include information about Pedestrian Traffic Movement at all intersections. It is suggested to provide pedestrian traffic volume counts in the detailed analysis reports of each intersection. • The proposed site is a future commercial development (as per the Traffic Impact Study) therefore the proposed daily truck trips, their types, along with their planned accesses to the proposed site needs to be clearly addressed/summarized. • The following information is missing on the Site Plan which needs to be addressed accordingly:- (i) Existing and future lane configuration on Brock Road, Pickering Parkway, Notion Road and other minor intersections (ii) Provide internal traffic circulation plan for the proposed development including directional arrows and signs (if any) indicating traffic (iii) Provide truck turning paths along with turning radii, truck lengths and widths 23 • Minor Issues: (i) Section 2.1(Page 3): Please correct the name of the road to Brock Road instead of Brock Street (ii) Section 2.3 & 6.1 (Page: 4 & 15): Please correct the survey days/dates according to its actual days/dates. Trusting that the above is satisfactory, should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. x November 12, 2010 Page 2 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 07/10 IN FOi:4 ;-'l PICKERING MEMO To: Deborah Wylie November 18, 2010 Senior Planner - Policy From: Marilee Gadzovski Senior Water Resources & Environmental Engineer Copy: Division Head, Engineering Services Manager, Development Control Subject: Zoning By-Law Amendment Application A07/10 Pickering Brock Centre 1755 & 1805 Pickering Pkwy & 1842-1856 Notion Road City of Pickering File: 0-4030 I have reviewed the submissions for the above-noted zoning by-law application and offer the following comments: 1. Given the development will be displacing approximately 12,000 m3 of flood storage during the Regional Storm, TRCA must approve the recommended approach to provide the equivalent flood storage prior to site plan stage as this could affect the design of the development. TRCA should also confirm if the SWM criteria is still valid for the site. 2. Please resubmit an updated storm water management report at the site plan stage that addresses the following items: • The site servicing design should include roof runoff to infiltration trenches and/or pervious pipes with overflows to the storm sewer (per TRCA LID Manual). • As well, please ensure that the inlet of the stormwater pond is located as far from the outlet as possible in order to avoid short-circuiting, please include forebay berming to distinguish between the forebay and the main cell of the pond. The current design does not satisfactorily meet the MOE criteria. • Please provide hydrogeological information and the geotechnical requirements for any proposed pond liner in the SWM pond design and ensure that they are included in the SWM report. MG:mg City o0 Information Report ~i Report Number: 02-11 For Public Information Meeting of PICKERING Date: January 4, 2011, 25 In Accordance with the Public Meeting Requirements of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13 Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 6/10 C. Bollmann 3325 Highway 7, Kinsale (North Part Lot 2, Concession 5) City of Pickering 1.0 Property Location and Description • the subject property is located on the south side of Highway 7, east of Audley Road (see Location Map - Attachment #1) • the subject property is approximately 4.0 hectares in area, with a lot frontage of 80 metres; and currently supports a detached dwelling and accessory barn structure (see Applicant's Submitted Plan - Attachment #2) • the surrounding land uses include residential to the east and west, and agricultural to the north and, south • a tributary of Lynde Creek traverses the southwestern portion of the subject property 2.0 Applicant's Proposal • the applicant is proposing a three year extension of a temporary use zoning by-law which permits a dog daycare and boarding facility with accessory retail use on the northern 0.6 hectares of the property • the dog daycare and boarding facility is proposed to be accommodated within the existing barn in the short term, and in a new building in the long term • the specialty retailing use is proposed to be accommodated within a portion of the existing dwelling • a site plan including the existing and proposed buildings was approved in May 2010 (see Approved Site Plan - Attachment #3) 3.0 Official Plan and Zoning 3.1 Durham Regional Official Plan • the portion of the property proposed for the dog daycare facility is designated "Rural Settlements - Hamlet" • Rural Settlement areas permit the establishment of commercial, residential community and recreational uses Information Report No. 02-11 Page 2 26 a "Major Open Space" designation applies to the southern portion of the subject property which is not proposed to be rezoned • the proposal appears to conform to the Durham Region Official Plan 3.2 Pickering Official Plan • the portion of the property proposed for the dog daycare facility is designated "Rural Settlements - Rural Hamlets", and "Hamlet Residential" within the Kinsale Settlement Area (see Attachment #4) • Rural Hamlet areas. permit a variety of uses including residential, commercial, community, cultural and recreational uses • the Kinsale Settlement policies encourage opportunities for enhancing the historic village of Kinsale through general or site-specific zoning that allows the introduction of arts and craft studios, workshops and small-scale commercial enterprises on suitable sites, providing the historic character of the village and the interests of neighbouring residents are respected • Schedule II to the Pickering Official Plan - "Transportation System" identifies the proposed future by-pass of Highway 7 through the southern portion of the property. Highway 7 is identified as a Type A Arterial Road which is the highest order arterial road and is designed to carry large volumes of traffic at moderate to high speeds 3.3 Zoning By-law 3037 • the portion of the property proposed for the dog daycare facility is zoned "CLR8- DD" - Cluster Residential - DD, as amended by By-law 2623/87, 3450/90 and 6787/07 (see Attachment #3) • the "CLR8-DD" zoning currently permits a detached dwelling use. A temporary use zoning by-law amendment to permit the proposed facility was approved by Council in July 2007 and has since expired (see By-law 6787/07 - Attachment #5) • an amendment to the zoning by-law is required to permit the dog daycare boarding facility and accessory retail use in the portion of the property currently designated "CLR8-DD" 4.0 Results of Circulation 4.1 Resident Comments • none received to date 4.2 Agency Comments • Ministry of Transportation (see Attachment #6) • applicant to be made aware that Ministry building/land-use permits will be required prior to any grading or construction on the site • Ministry will require a minimum 14.0 metre setback from Highway 7 right-of-way for Highway 7 road widening • Ministry permit review process includes the review and approval of a detailed Site Plan and Site Grading/Drainage Plan Information Report No. 02-11 Page 3 27 • Central Lake Ontario Conservation (see Attachment #7) • no objection to the extension of the temporary use being requested 4.3 Staff Comments • a number of issues relating to noise, the structural integrity of the barn and the need for site plan approval were identified during the review of the original zoning amendment application. These issues were addressed in the temporary use by-law approved in 2007 and the site plan approval granted in' May 2010. Any additional issues will be addressed in the proposed zoning by-law i 5.0 Procedural Information • written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning & Development Department • oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting • all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Council or a Committee of Council • any member of the public who wishes to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this proposal • any member of the public who wishes to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal must request such in writing to the City Clerk 6.0 Other Information 6.1 Appendix No. I • list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing report 6.2 Information Received • in addition to the full scale copies of the Applicant's Submitted Plan, the following documents are available for viewing at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department: • Planning Rationale • Sustainable Development Letter Information Report No. 02-11 Page 4 2 6.3 Company Principal • the owner and applicant is Corrine Bollmann Co Mila Yeung Marg Wouters MCIP, RPP Planner I Manager, Development Review & Urban Design MYAd Attachments Copy: Director, Planning & Development 29 Appendix No. I to Information Report No. 02-11 Commenting Residents and Landowners (1) none received to date Commenting Agencies (1) Ministry of Transportation (2) Central Lake Ontario Conservation Commenting City Departments (1) none received to date ATTACHMENT #-LTO tI+3mi~a~aF~rioN RE T# d Z- KI SALE HIGHWAY 7 U ECT RO ERTY r r O ARCLAY ESTATES City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CON 5 N PT LOT 2 OWNER C. Bollmann DATE Oct. 25, 2010 DRAWN BY JB FILE No. A 06/10 SCALE 1:10,000 CHECKED BY MY N e p c " et Enterprise. Inc. d its supplier.. Ail rights Reserved. Not a plan of eurv 0 2005 MPAC and it. .u Ii.rs. All A ht. R...rv.d. Not c Ian of 5„rv.. e''' PN-RUR ATTACHMENT#.CR-TO 1NE0R-Tr<1AT10NP0RT# Information Compiled from Applicants Submitted Plan 3 A 06/10 C. Bollmann HIGHWAY7 =7 -zzz _ I.is ivi b~, i ' T. ~•a 11 ' ~ - i I ~ i / i' i i 3 ~ „b i iY 1~ is r 3 s` J i i This map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department, Planning Information Services division Mapping and Design, Oct. 25, 2010. A~TTACH8 perry ,gy 3 3 _ R' W e-i W e i 3 'z 3~S a ~ a 8 ~ a ~s a acai¢i z S g Wgy x~ Vn u, o a s w -s Y° Z °a w o rz A au ¢SH~w a3~c~a ,1n". °38 a in~"~ ~ ~'xmR Z~ c ~ $ Za QU 3 , ffm we u, ?wQ ~w ¢mc 'tgs ~ $ r~ ~ Lx ~ ~ wo - E ¢w~Q imyaw 00i CJ.-, ~ o ~z dos yF~ rN v_ n 15 asou z us c~~u,ua o 3m ~ aW a is v ~gY ~ ..'I i a # ib; OEM -3 - Ln Atl~H9IH 5 zp 1° 3p / 1 ~igz;7 ;de.l lu~ 90 a ,,f / /a W g i v Y wtr ~Wys. ~~~a.o ~ ~ ~ p wz.11 - O ,f1 \ O E\'gq 9 O m~ ti i = i II INFORMATION COMPILED FROM PICKERING OFFICIAL PLAN & ZONING BY-LAW 3037 33 LLT, hi ~7t t18--WAY 7 - - 77 01 . SUELOECT, PROPERTY t.~ W { rte, ~ ~ Q City of Pickering Planning & Development Department OPEN SPACE SYSTEM BY-IAW 70.17 HAMLET DESIGNATIONS DATE Dec 2010 jjFyx' NATURAL AREAS ®'CLRB-DD CLVST(]T RESIDEMIAL' FIAMLET RESIDENTIAL NEW ROAD CONNECTIONS r7l OTHER DESIGNATIONS 's OPEN SPACE- (PIiOPDSED) ® 'RURAL AGRICULTURE' NATURAL SYSTEM SPECIAL INTEREST SITE DRAWN BY JB AGRICULTURAL AREAS O RURAL STUDY AREAS ® HAMLET COMMERCIAL CHECKED BY MY ato Sources: M 25 eMPACerp acct. Inc. obrs' AIIe r alts Roe,gohteJORe n rv a . N~ tso^plan of eurvsy. SCALE NT S PN-RUT ATTAC ENT c,jo 34 PORT THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING BY-LAW NO.6787/07 Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area Zoning By-law ' 3037, as amended by By-laws 2623/87, 3450/90 and. 6696/06, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham, North Part of Lot 2, Concession 5, City of Pickering. (A 17/05) WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering deems it desirable to enact a temporary use by-law for a ,period of three years to permit the establishment of a. dog daycare and boarding facility with an ancillary retail store ;on the lands,, being North Part of Lot 2, Concession 5, in the City of Pickering;, AND WHEREAS an amendment to By-law 3037, as amended by By4aws 2623/87, 3450/90 and 6696/06, is therefore deemed necessary; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. TEXT AMENDMENT Section 5:(1) of By-law 2623/87, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto new subsection (d) after subsection (c) as follows: (d) Exception ("CLR8-DD". Zone) (i) Despite any provisions in this By-law to the contrary, in addition to any other uses permitted under the "CLR8" zone, a dog daycare and boarding facility shall be permitted until July 23, 2010 on the' lands designated "CLR8=DD" (North Part of Lot 2, Concession 5) on Schedule "I" attached , hereto in accordance with the following provisions: A. The maximum number of dogs permitted'within a dog daycare . and boarding facility at any one time shaft be 30; B. A dog daycare and boarding facility shall be permitted to operate within an accessory structure, with.a maximum height of 5.5 metres; C. The overnight boarding of dogs skull be provided in a non- crating environment; D. An outdoor exercise area shall be provided in the rear yard and shall be set back a minimum of 10.0 metres from, all property lines; ATTA IvIE lT To 35 By-law No. 6787/07 (Continued, E. A maximum of one retail store shall be permitted for the sale of products ancillary to a dog daycare and boarding facility; F. An ancillary retail store shall not be permitted within an accessory structure and shall not exceed a maximum gross floor area 50 square metres; G. In addition to the parking requirements for a detached .dwelling, a minimum of 5 parking spaces shall be provided and maintained on-site. (ii) For the purpose of this subsection the following: definition shall apply, "Dog Daycare.and Boarding Facility" - shall mean a facility in which the daytime care of dogs is provided and shall include the overnight boarding. of dogs, but shall not include the breeding or sale of dogs,.. or a veterinary clinic. 2. SCHEDULE AMENDMENT Schedule "I" to. By-law 2623/87, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the "CLR8" zone to a "CLR8-DD" zone designation on the lands being North Part of Lot 2, Concession 5, in the City of Pickering, as shown on Schedule "I" attached hereto. 3. BY-LAW 3037 By-.law 3037, as amended by By-laws 2623/87, 3450/90 and 6)696/06 is hereby further amended only to the extent necessary -to give effect to the provisions of this By-law as set out in. Section 1 above; and as set out on Schedule "I" attached hereto. Definitions and subject matter not specifically dealt with in this By-law shall be governed by the relevant provisions of By-law 3037, as amended 4. EFFECTIVE DATE This By-law stall come into force in accordance with the provisions of.. the Planning Act,. and shall. remain in effect for three years. from the date of passing hereof, unless repealed or extended in accordance with the above-mentioned provisions. BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 23`d day of July, 2007. David ; Yor . Debi A. Bertiley, Citq Clerk I ATTAa4fVr,TlJTfll!~ 70 ~ I I I I ~ I I I M=Wl FWW CUd Cud I I I r I I I LOT 3 LOT 2 I I CONCESSION 6 CONCESSION 6 I ~ AS WMLISNED Wf THE I I - ~ ~ ICON T10N OAllIHORRY CUV I I { I I I I I i I COCA . AN" Of w. r men, HOMY 7 HO WAY 7 I -c-L- L cam i omammmoom aoco LAD nr , - ~ I I I I LOT 3 y I LOT 2 1 i I I CONCESSION 5 C*CESSION ~5 I . I - - - - - - - - - - _ - I I I I I I SCHM%E 1 i 1 I. I rp gy4M 2623/87 AmVxWVYGtt4AW 8x/90 6 FURTHER AM ENDW BY Wf4A y. 5606/0 FURTHER AAM3C pgYgY4,AW 6787/07 PAWW7HIg "23rd,; DAY C►F Ole CTIY DENA. BiI MMY ' ATT C MEET ..!v TO Ministry of Transportation Ministere des Transports DEC 1 4 2010 " 7 Central Region Region du Centre Corridor Management Section Section de gestion des couloirs routiers '~~Ll~PMN t 12 f ' 1 1~ Floor, Bldg. D 7e 0tage. edifice ls 1201 Wilson Avenue 1201, avenue Wilson Downsview. ON M3M 1 J8 Downsview, ON M3M 1 J8 Tel.: 416-235- Tkl. 416-235- Faz.: 416-235-4267 Te1ec.. 416-235-4267 December 14, 2010 Debbie Shields Administration Department City of Pickering Pickering Civic Complex One The Esplanade Pickering, (Ontario L1V 6K7 Re: Zoning Amendment Application: A 6/14 Part Lot 24 & 26, Concession 6 Highway 7 & 7/12, Township of Whitby, Region of Durham Dear Ms. Shields: The ministry has completed its review of the above zoning amendment application and offers the following comments. The applicant should be made aware that Ministry building/land-use permits will be required prior to any grading or construction on this site. This Ministry will require a minimum 14m setback from the Highway 7 right-of-way to any new . buildings/structures above and below ground. Further, any feature deemed essential to the operation of the site (including parking spaces required by municipal by-law, fire routes, underground structures or servicing, etc.) must be setback a minimum of 14 metres from the Highway 7/12 right-of-way. In addition, any parking within the 14m setback must be surplus to the site requirements and so denoted on the Site Plan. The proponent should be aware that Highway 7 is being improved, and that the setback will be measured from the new property limit. The Ministry's permit review process includes (but is not be limited to) the review and approval of a detailed Site Plan and Site Grading/Drainage Plan. Further information on our permit requirements is available from our office by contacting Mr. Bryan Porter, Permits Officer, at (416-235-5559). Sign permits may be required as well. Permits must be obtained from Mr. Bryan Porter, Permits Officer (416) 235-5559, at the above-captioned address. Yours Truly, Graham D. Routledge Corridor Management Technician ATTACMAIE nT a-TO IN6LJJUUk'7AMIa,.+G'3M$"1.YY'igO 38 RECEIVED 100 Whiting Avenue CL'11trC1.I DEC Q10 Oshawa, Ontario L1 H 3T3 Like Ontario CITY OF PICKE SING Phone (905) 579-0411 PLANNING D`EV~ O1~P~1~N7 Fax (905) 579-0994 Conservation Web: www.cloca.com Email: mail@cloca.com Member of Conservation Ontario December 13, 2010 The Corporation of the City of Pickering Planning Department One the Esplanade Pickering, ON L 1 V 5K7 Attention: Ms. Mila Yeung Dear Madam: Subject: Zoning Amendment Application - A 6/10 C. Bollmann 3325 Highway No. 7 Part Lot 2, Concession 5, City of Pickering. Authority File No. A 6/10. Purpose of Application: To permit the extension of a temporary use of a dog day care and boarding facility with accessory retail use onsite. Authority staff has reviewed the subject application and has no objections to the extension of the temporary use being requested. While there is a tributary of Lynde Creek with associated floodplain passing through the subject lands, it is located well away from the on=site building (approximately 270 metres south) and therefore there should be no risk to the structure or inhabitants as a result of this hazard. We thank you for the opportunity to comment on this application. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, Ted Aikins Planner TA/ G:\planning\planning\comments\2010\a-6-10 pickering no obj. Page 1 of 1 What we do on the land is mirrored in the water City o¢~ Information Report Report Number: 03-11 For Public Information Meeting of PICKERING Date: January 4, 2011 39 In Accordance with the Public Meeting Requirements of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13 Subject: Zoning Amendment Application A 8/10 P. Albanese 1448 Rougemount Drive (Part of Lot 16, Plan 228) City of Pickering 1.0 Property Location and Description • the subject property is located on the west side of Rougemount Drive, north of Kingston Road (see Location Map - Attachment #1) • the property has a frontage of 30.5 metres, a depth of 137 metres and a total lot area of approximately 0.4 hectares • the property is currently occupied by a one-storey detached bungalow with a detached garage (see Applicant's Submitted Plan - Attachment #2) • to the north, south and east of the property are detached dwellings on lots with frontages ranging from approximately 15 metres to 30 metres; an elementary public school (Elizabeth B. Phin) abuts the property to the west 2.0 Applicant's Proposal • the applicant is proposing to amend the existing zoning from an "R3" - Third Density Residential Zone to an "R4" - Fourth Density Residential Zone • the applicant is also proposing to amend the standard "R4" side yard setbacks from 1.5 metres on both sides to 1.2 metres on one side and 1.8 metres on the other • if the proposed zoning is approved, the applicant intends to file an application with the Region of Durham to sever the subject property into two lots with minimum lot frontages of 15.0 metres • a new detached dwelling is proposed to be constructed on the northerly lot, while the existing dwelling is proposed to be retained on the southerly lot 3.0 Official Plan and Zoning 3.1 Durham Regional Official Plan • the Regional Plan designates the subject lands "Living Areas" • these areas are intended to be predominantly used for housing purposes, and may include limited office, retail and personal service uses • the applicant's proposal appears to comply with the intent of the Regional Plan Information Report No. 03-11 Page 2 40 3.2 Pickering Official Plan • the Pickering Official Plan designates the subject lands "Urban Residential - Low Density Areas" within the Rougemount Neighbourhood • permissible uses include residential uses, and limited office and retail uses serving the area • the applicant's proposal to create an additional lot will result in a net residential density of approximately 5 units per net hectare, which is within the density range (less than 30 units per net hectare) for "Low Density Areas" • the Rougemount Neighbourhood policies state that in established areas along Rougemount Drive, Council shall encourage and where possible require that new development be compatible with the character of existing development • Rougemount Drive is designated as a collector road which generally provides access to individual properties, local, collector and arterial roads 3.3 Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 2912/88 • the subject property is zoned "R3"- Third Density Residential Zone which permits a detached dwelling on a residential lot with a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres and a minimum lot area of 550 square metres • the current zoning also contains specific performance standards (approved through By-law 2912/88) which came out of the Rougemount Drive North Study; the performance standards are intended to recognize and preserve the character of Rougemount Drive north of Kingston Road and relate to front yard setbacks, building height, and garage projections • an amendment to the existing zoning by-law is required to allow for the future severance of the subject property into two lots with minimum lot frontages of 15.0 metres, minimum lot areas of 460 square metres, and reduced. side yard setbacks 4.0 Results of Circulation 4.1 Resident Comments • none received to date 4.2 Agency Comments • none received to date Information Report No. 03-11 Page 3 41 4.3 Staff Comments • in reviewing the application to date, the following matters have been identified by staff for further review and consideration: • compatibility of the proposed 15.0 metre lots and revised side yard setbacks with the character of existing development • regard for the performance standards of By-law 2912/88 • protection of existing vegetation on the future severed and retained parcels, as well as on adjoining properties • the impacts if any, on a proposed second driveway access onto Rougemount Drive 5.0 Procedural Information • written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning & Development Department • oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting • all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Council or a Committee of Council • any member of the public who wishes to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this proposal • any member of the public who wishes to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal must request such in writing to the City Clerk 6.0 Other Information 6.1 Appendix No. • list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing report 6.2 Information Received • in addition to the full scale copies of the Applicant's Submitted Plan, the following documents are available for viewing at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department: • Site Grading Plan • Planning Rationale & Sustainability Report Information Report No. 03-11 Page 4 4' 6.3 Company Principal • the owner of the subject property is Pietro Albanese • the authorized agent is Franco Lobozzo Ashley Yearwood Marg Wouters, MCIP, RPP Planner I Manager, Development Review & Urban Design AY:ld Attachments Copy: Director, Planning & Development 43 Appendix No. I to Information Report No. 03-11 Commenting Residents and Landowners none received to date (1) Commenting Agencies I (1) none received to date Commenting City Departments (1) none received to date ATTPLI"aM0qT# , TO 44 iLLLLLLLij-i-11-i-LL~L TWYN RIVERS DRIVE SHEPPARD AVENU O ST. MONICA S <o SEPARATE SCHOOL ° ARDSON STREET o y Z T o O~ G ~n STREET EH N OUR ~O ° ELIZABETH ~o a B. PHIN STOVER CRESCENT PUBLIC w SCHOOL O W =1 E I z A it I FIDDLERS DRIVE LZ ° TOML SON CRT a z n O w a c a STREET Or ~ o z a ° z o it o DRIVE ¢ m O ° ;0 ~`yoo PETTICOAT C M O p RARY A ~7 U ROUGE HILL M UNITY VALLEY GATE BROOKRIDGE G O,A CHURCH /LF Li OF THE a NAZARENE ~t JO z ~oPO F yc\NGS~ON a City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Part Lot 16, Plan 228 OWNER P. Albanese DATE Nov 19, 2010 DRAWN BY JB FILE No. A08/10 SCALE 1:5,000 CHECKED BY AY N ourc.r c T.-t Ent.rprl... Inc. tl It. .up 11 R tel. eEh Not...rv1d^ N*tS. PIcn W PN-5 c 2005 MPAC and It. . Il.n. All A ATTACHWENTO TO ~o N A r 45 3ANG 1Nnon3ono2j co n OT mo r, n E ~ C U) Z r" j ~ ma 0 W_ 9i C+ d J CL N E WI ~'ar = c• O O ` O Z'- 00 .C Q Q O O a ; I M V Cl) O m U); E O; y,. O ~ i qy .1 I i I ~g I 6Z'0£ tr. 61,0 L,}S.91ry Information Report Report Number: 04-11 For Public Information Meeting of PICKERING Date: January 4, 2011 46 In Accordance with the Public Meeting Requirements of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13 Subject: Zoning Amendment Application A 9/10 M. Rajadurai 1975 Guild Road (Lots 36 and 37, Plan 316) City of Pickering 1.0 Property Location and Description • the subject property is located on the east side of Guild Road, north of Kingston Road (see Location Map - Attachment #1) the property has a frontage of 31.1 metres, a depth of 56.4 metres and a total lot area of approximately 1,760 square metres (see Applicant's Submitted Plan - Attachment #2) • the property is currently occupied by a one-storey detached bungalow with a detached garage • surrounded uses include detached dwellings on lots with frontages of approximately 15.0 metres 2.0 Applicant's Proposal • the applicant is proposing to amend the existing zoning from an "R3" - Third Density Residential Zone to an "R4" - Fourth Density Residential Zone • if the proposed zoning is approved, the applicant intends to file an application with the Region of Durham to sever the subject property into two lots with minimum lot frontages of 15.0 metres • the applicant intends to demolish the existing bungalow and detached garage for the purpose of constructing two new two-storey detached dwellings 3.0 Official Plan and Zoning 3.1 Durham Regional Official Plan • the Regional Plan designates the subject lands "Living Areas" • these areas are intended to be predominantly used for housing purposes, and may include limited office, retail and personal service uses • the applicant's proposal appears to comply with the intent of the Regional Plan Information Report No. 04-11 Page, 2 3.2 Pickering Official Plan 47 • the Pickering Official Plan designates the subject lands "Urban Residential - Medium Density Areas" within the Village East Neighbourhood • permissible uses include residential uses, and limited office and retail uses serving the area • the density range for Medium Density Areas is more than 30 and up to and including 80 units per net hectare. However, the Official Plan allows for development below the range if it can be demonstrated that the proposed development can be intensified over time to achieve the required density • the applicant's proposal to create an additional lot will result in a net residential density of approximately 11 units per net hectare 3.3 Zoning By-law 3036 • the subject property is zoned "R3" - Third Density Residential Zone • the zoning permits a detached dwelling on a residential lot with a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres and a minimum lot area of 550 square metres • an amendment to the existing zoning by-law is required to allow for the future severance of the subject property into two lots with a minimum lot frontage of 15.0 metres and minimum lot area of 460 square metres 4.0 Results of Circulation 4.1 Resident Comments • none received to date 4.2 Agency Comments • none received to date 4.3 Staff Comments • in reviewing the application to date, the following matters have been identified by staff for further review and consideration: • compatibility of the proposed 15.0 metre lots and proposed new dwellings with the character of existing development • protection of existing vegetation on the future severed and retained parcels, as well as on adjoining properties the impacts if any, of a proposed second driveway access onto Guild Road Information Report No. 04-11 Page 3 4 5.0 Procedural Information • written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the Planning & Development Department • oral comments may be made at the Public Information Meeting • all comments received will be noted and used as input in a Planning Report prepared by the Planning & Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Council or a Committee of Council • any member of the public who wishes to reserve the option to appeal Council's decision must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this proposal • any member of the public who wishes to be notified of Council's decision regarding this proposal must request such in writing to the City Clerk 6.0 Other Information 6.1 Appendix No. I • list of neighbourhood residents, community associations, agencies and City Departments that have commented on the applications at the time of writing report 6.2 Information Received • in addition to the full scale copies of the Applicant's Submitted Plan, the following documents are available for viewing at the offices of the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department: • Architectural Design Statement • Planning Rationale • Sustainable Development Report 6.3 Company Principal • the owner and applicant of the subject property is Muky Rajadurai 7ti~ c~~ o- lq1 c~J Ashley Yearwood Marg Wouters, MCIP, RPP Planner I Manager, Development Review & . Urban Design AY:ld Attachments Copy: Director, Planning & Development 49 Appendix No. I to Information Report No. 04-11 Commenting Residents and Landowners (1) none received to date Commenting Agencies (1) none received to date Commenting City Departments (1) none received to date ATTACHMENT'#-TO RE 9, 50 o w 3 w ST. ANTHONY ° DANIEL Z' Y J SEPARATE L 0 SCHOOL N LX > m ° zo C) PICA a ISLA DRIVE m w CEN . } w Q J } N Of M BEATON D O Q r r O U B OCK RIDGE COMMUNITY PARK FINCH AVENUE FINCH 0 0 d ~ 0 I 1~zO PPO o ~\NGS~o OBJECT P OPERTY ° U O C1RO~E o DENMAR M City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lots 36 & 37, Plan 316 07\ OWNER M. Rajadural DATE Nov 19, 2010 DRAWN BY JB FILE No. A09/10 SCALE 1:5,000 CHECKED BY AY N Da to ours..: .t Ent.rprl Ine. and It. u pll.n. All rtght• R...rv.d. Not a plan of .urv.Y. PN-8 T2*0'..MPAC ontl It. • Iler.. All rI ht. Reservetl. Not olon o1 Survs . ATTACHMENT# RT Information Compiled from Applicant's 5 Submitted Plan A 09/10 M. Rajadurai EXISTING LOT 36 LOT 3' EXISTING DWELLING & GARAGE i TO BE DEMOLISHED 56.39m 1---15.5m ; 3":.09m I GUILD ROAD PROPOSED I I PROPOSED RETAINED LOT ; PROPOSED SEVERED LOT I i I PROPOSED i I 56.39m ; PROPOSED DWELLING I I DWELLING I I ; I I ; I 15.5m 31.09m GUILD ROAD This map was produced by the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department. Planning Information Services division Mapping and Design, Nov 17. 2010. Ciw Report To Planning & Development Committee PICKERING Report Number: PD 01-11 52 Date: January 4, 2011 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: Proposed Wireless Cell Tower Installation Rogers Wireless 5025 Sideline 8 (Part of Lot 7 & 8, Concession 9) City of Pickering Recommendation: 1. That Report 01-11 of the Director, Planning & Development be received; 2. That Rogers Wireless be advised that City Council has no objection to the proposed 60 metre high cell tower installation at 5025 Sideline 8; and 3. Further, that the City Clerk advise Rogers Wireless accordingly. Executive Summary: On February 25, 2010 Rogers Wireless submitted a proposal to the City Clerk proposing to construct a 60 metre high self supported free standing cell tower at 5025 Sideline 8. By Resolution #42/10, the council correspondence (CORR 19-10) was referred to the Director, Planning & Development for a report. Since the submission of the initial proposal, Rogers Wireless completed their public consultation process, in accordance with Industry Canada's requirements. Rogers has advised that no public comments were received and are requesting that City Council provide a statement of concurrence in support of the installation. City staff are supportive of the proposed installation.. There do not appear to be other opportunities to co-locate this installation in the immediate area. The proposed siting of the tower and equipment compound appears to minimize any disturbance to existing vegetation while utilizing the existing vegetation to screen the equipment compound. It is recommended that Rogers Wireless be advised that City Council has no objection to the proposed cell tower at 5025 Sideline 8. Financial Implications: No direct costs to the City are anticipated as a result of the proposed development. Report PD 01-11 January 4, 2011 Subject: Proposed Wireless Cell Tower Installation Page 2 53 Sustainability Implications: Enhancement to the wireless coverage at this location will improve business and community communication capability. The proposed tower and associated equipment compound has been sited to minimize disturbance of existing vegetation. 1.0 Background: On February 25, 2010, Rogers Wireless submitted a proposal to the City Clerk outlining its intent to construct a free standing cell tower on the lands municipally known as 5025 Sideline 8 (see Applicant's Proposal and Sample Notification Package - Attachment #1 and Location Map - Attachment #2). 1.1 The Proposal Rogers Wireless proposes to install a 60 metre high self supporting communication tower and related ground cabinets. The base of the proposed tower is approximately 7.0 metres wide. The two ground cabinets, which house the radio equipment, occupy an area of 2.2 metres by 5.0 metres and are located at the base of the tower. The tower and ground cabinets will be located in a fenced compound measuring approximately 16.5 metres by 18.0 metres. The compound is proposed to be set back approximately 50 metres from Regional Road 5 which will provide the principal access (see Applicant's Submitted Plan - Attachments #3 & #4). 1.2 Property Description The lands known as 5025 Sideline 8 are currently zoned W- Rural Agriculture and `ORM-EP' - Oak Ridges Moraine Environmental Protection in By-law 3037 as amended by By-laws 6577/05 and 6640/06. The area of the property where the cell tower facility is proposed is entirely within the W- Rural Agriculture Zone. The subject property currently supports a residential dwelling with a number of accessory buildings. The subject lands are surrounded by agriculturalVesidential uses in all directions from the proposed cell tower with the closest residential dwelling located approximately 280 metres to the south of the site. 2.0 Discussion: 2.1 Required Public Notification has been completed Planning & Development staff are currently in the process of developing a protocol respecting the installation of cell towers for City Council's consideration. In the absence of a City protocol, applicants must follow Industry Canada's requirements as outlined in Spectrum Management and Telecommunications CPC (Client Procedures Circular) 2-0-03 Issue 4. Report PD 01-11 January 4, 2011 Subject: Proposed Wireless Cell Tower Installation Page 3 The Industry Canada requirements for public consultation require the proponent to consult with the land use authority, and the public within a radius of three times the tower height, measured from the tower base or the outside perimeter of the supporting structure. For structures greater than 30 metres in height, proponents are required to place a notice in the local community newspaper. Based on the proposed 60 metre tower height, the proposed installation required notification to three adjoining property owners. Rogers has indicated that they have provided written notification to the three adjoining property owners and placed a notice of the proposed installation in the April 9, 2010 edition of the News Advertiser (see Applicant's Proposal and Sample Notification Package - Attachment #1 and Newspaper Notice - Attachment #5). Rogers Wireless confirmed that no public comments were received as a result of the public notification process (see Applicant's Notice of Completion of Public Consultation - Attachment #6). 2.2 Co-location opportunities have been examined The installation and creation of separate, stand alone, radio communication towers and broadcasting facilities is discouraged unless all other co-location options have been explored and are considered unfeasible. Rogers Wireless and City staff have reviewed the options of co-locating on existing towers, locating on hydro transmission towers, using alternative tower structures and buildings and clustering of the facilities with existing installations, and have concluded that there are no existing structures in the immediate area that could be utilized to provide adequate wireless coverage. 2.3 Proposed Tower Location is acceptable Staff support the proposed location of this cell tower facility. The portion of the site where the tower and compound are to be located is entirely within the Rural Agriculture zone and does not impact the portion of the lands within the Oak Ridges Moraine. The applicant has proposed to access the site from Regional Road 5. The proposed tower and equipment compound are to be located in a clearing behind existing vegetation. The proposed location minimizes disturbance to existing vegetation and provides adequate screening for the compound from Regional Road 5. No additional screening is recommended for this installation. Staff recommend that City Council approve the recommendations in this report as the proposed installation minimizes disruption to natural features, is not located in proximity to incompatible and\or sensitive land uses and is located with appropriate setbacks and screening from Regional Road 5. Report PD 01-11 January 4, 2011 Subject: Proposed Wireless Cell Tower Installation Page 4 55 Attachments: 1 Applicant's Proposal and Sample Notification Package 2. Location Map 3. Applicant's Submitted Plan - Site Layout 4. Applicant's Submitted Plan - Tower Elevation 5. Applicant's Newspaper Notice 6. Applicant's Notice of Completion of Public Consultation Prep Y: Approved/Endorsed By: yler Barne Neil Carro`1A G , RPP Se nner - Site Planning Director, Planning & Development Marg Wouters, MCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review & Urban Design TB:Id Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering 'ty Council , . ZOr Zo/0 Tony Prevedel, P.Eng. Chief Administrative Officer ATTACHMENT ~ TO REPORT # P0~ 56 ` :5 T0: E 2?ti -a 8200 Dixie Road Brampton, Ontario L6T OC 1 February 25, 2010 i Debbie Shields Clerk City of Pickering One The Esplanade Pickering, Ontario CLEF S aIN L1V 6K7 Dear Ms Shields: Re: Rogers Site "9th Concession & 6th Sideline", C3673 Proposed Telecommunications Tower - 9th Concession and 6th Sideline Part of Lot 7, Concession 9 On behalf of Rogers Wireless ("Rogers"), I would like to submit a site information package concerning a proposed wireless site located at the above noted location as required by Industry Canada Directive CPC 2-0-03. This directive requires the applicant to make our submission to Council, but going forward we will address this issue with planning staff. Project Description & Proposed Location Rogers is constantly improving and expanding its infrastructure to meet the ever-growing demand for high-quality reliable wireless and data services. The proposed site is needed to improve our wireless and data services in and around the vicinity of Athens. The following is a brief overview of the site: 1. Tower type: Self Supported/Free standing, 60 metres in height. 2. Equipment Cabinets: 2 mechanical. equipment cabinets are to be located at the base of the tower. These cabinets will house the radio equipment used to operate the site. 3. Notification forms: A copy of the standard public notification form and newspaper notice is attached. Municipal Consultation Process Rogers Wireless is regulated and licensed by Industry Canada to provide inter-provincial wireless and data services. As a federal undertaking, Rogers is required by Industry Canada to consult with land-use authorities in siting tower locations. The consultation process established under Industry Canada's authority is intended to allow the local land- use authorities the opportunity to address land-use concerns while respecting the federal I - r - IS S ATTACHMENT # i TO REPORT # PD D/^~ c 7 government's exclusive jurisdiction in the siting and operation of wireless and data J systems. As the provisions of the Ontario Planning Act and other municipal by-laws and regulations do not apply to federal undertakings, Rogers is however required to follow established and documented wireless protocols or processes set forth by land-use authorities. In instances where those established and documented processes do not exist, Rogers must follow Industry Canada's Default Consultation Process,, a copy of Industry Canada's CPC-2-0-03 (Issue 4) is attached describing such default consultation processes. In accordance with Industry Canada's CPC, please provide us with a list of property owners within 180 metres from the tower location as illustrated in the site information package. For your reference a map showing the properties that fall within the 180 metre radius is contained in the top left corner of the site plan. Rogers will in turn issue notification letters (see standard notification letter) for circulation. Rogers will also post a notice (see standard newspaper notice) in the local newspaper. Once circulation efforts and notice periods end, Rogers will prepare a summary report for the municipality's review. Collocation Co-location is not possible in this particular situation as there are no other suitable existing or proposed tower structures in the vicinity that would provide adequate wireless coverage. Conclusion Rogers feels that the proposed site is well located to provide and improve wireless and data services in the targeted area. The proposed site is also situated and designed so as to have minimal impact on surrounding land uses. Rogers looks forward to working with City in providing better service. Kindly review the site information package; please contact me at 416-402-1169 or matthew.milligan~rci.rogers.com if there are questions. Yours truly, Rogers Communications Inc. Matthew Milligan, MCIP, RPP Site AcquisAlon Specialist. C: Tyler Barnett, City of Pickering Rene Guerrette, Industry Canada 5 8 ATTACHMENT # TO REPORT # PO February 25, 2010 Tyler Barnett Planner City of Pickering One The Esplanade Pickering, Ontario L1V 6K7 Dear Mr. Barnett: Re: Tower Application Rogers Site "9th Concession & 6th Sideline", C3673 Proposed Telecommunications Tower - 9th Concession and 6th Sideline Part of Lot 7, Concession 9 Please find our enclosed application which we have made to the Clerk as required by industry Canada's directive. Enclosed are multiple copies of the site plan for your review, along with a draft of the newspaper notice and public notification document. These documents were drafted in order to comply with Industry Canada's requirements. In our initial discussion there were some questions about tower height and co-location. Please consider the following with respect to these issues: Collocation There are no co-location options to provide service in the targeted area. The closest tower is owned by Telus and is located on the Uxbridge/Pickering Townline just west of Lakeridge Road. Its location, height and existing loading prevent this location from providing service in the targeted area near to the 9th concession and 6th sideline. Rogers is looking to co-locate on this tower, but to provide coverage on the local ski resorts. This location on the Townline will not provide coverage in the targeted area of 9th concession and 6th sideline. The next closest tower is on Brock Road just north of Webb Road. This is an existing Rogers tower which does not provide coverage in the targeted area at 9th concession and 6th sideline. Tower Heiaht. I The proposed tower height is 60 metres. This height is required to ensure, adequate wireless coverage will be provided in the targeted area and to ensure seamless coverage with our existing network infrastructure. The tower height is similar to other tower that ATTACHNfENT # J REPORT # PD o - 59 have been built in recent years in rural areas of Pickering and other areas around the GTA. I trust that we have addressed your initial concerns. If further questions arise prior to the public notification or if YOU vv'is h io address our application in person, please let rile know. Rogers looks forward to working with City on this matter. Yours truly, Rogers Communications Inc. Matthew Milligan, MCIP, RPP Site Acquisition Specialist. C: Industry Canada ATTACHMENT # / TO 6 0 REPORT! PD_ /5 TM .ROG RS Your World Right Now Public Consultation - Wireless Telecommunications Tower Site Part of Lot 7, Concession 9 City of Pickering Rogers Wireless Inc. 8200 Dixie Road Brampton, ON L6T OC 1 Phone: (647) 747-4684 ATTACHMENT # To 61 REPORI # PD--IT Purpose Background & Coverage Requirement The selection of a wireless telecommunications site works similarly to fitting a piece into a puzzle. In this case, the puzzle is a complex radio network, situated in a rural setting. Client demand, radio frequency engineering principles, local topography and land use opportunities working in concert with one another direct the geography of our sites. In order to achieve a reliable wireless network, carriers must provide a seamless transmission signal to alleviate any gaps in coverage. Gaps in coverage are responsible for dropped calls, and unavailable service to clients. Rogers would utilize the following proposed site locations in order to provide high quality network signal for its 3G high speed wireless voice and data network. Wireless carriers constantly strive to improve coverage and network quality for the sake of their clients. In the recent past, due to subscriber feedback, our Network Planning and Engineering departments have become aware of coverage deficiencies new to Athens The proposed site is situated in a topographically challenging rural area and the wireless coverage deficiencies are recognized by the Rogers network. Unfortunately, there were no existing structures which could have been utilized in the area. Proposed Site Location Rogers proposed to build a new telecommunications site approximately 125 metres west of the intersection of the 9th Concession and Sideline No. 6. The property's legal description is: Part of Lot 7, Concession No. 9 The geographic coordinates for the site are as follows; Latitude (NAD 83) 43-59-10N Longitude (NAD 83) 079-04-23 Health Canada's Safety Code 6 Compliance Rogers attests that the radio antenna system described in this notification package will comply with Health Canada's Safety Code 6 limits, as may be amended from time to time, for the protection of the general public including any combined effects of additional carrier collocations and nearby installations within the local radio environment. Control of Public Access The site facility would include a locked, alarmed and electronically monitored mechanical equipment shelter. Fencing would be installed around the base of the tower and equipment shelter and would include one locked gate access point. Canadian Environmental Assessment Act Rogers attests that the radio antenna system described in this notification package will comply with the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act as this facility is exempt from assessment. 2 0 E - WIRELESS ATTACHMENT # 6 2 REPORT # PD ITO Description of Proposed System The proposed site is a self supporting type. The tower and associated equipment will take up on area of 290 square metres. The tower would initially provide wireless voice and data services for subscribers to the Rogers network. A copy of Rogers' surveyed site plan has been attached for your reference and information. Transport Canada's Aeronautical Obstruction Marking Requirements Rogers attests that the radio antenna system described in this notification package will comply with Transport Canada / NAV Canada aeronautical safety requirements. Rogers will make all necessary applications to Transport Canada and NAV Canada. Engineering Practices Rogers attests that the radio antenna system described in this notification package will be constructed in compliance with the National Building Code of Canada and comply with good engineering practices including structural adequacy. Local Land Use Requirements Wireless Facilities are exclusively regulated by the Federal Government and as a result are not required to obtain municipal permits of any kind. City of Pickering does not have any Council adopted policies or protocols relevant to Rogers' proposal. Industry Canada's Spectrum Management Please be advised that the approval of this site and its design is under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Government of Canada through Industry. Canada. Rogers Wireless Inc. is participating in this circulation in accordance with Industry Canada's guidelines CPC-2-0-03. For more information on Industry Canada's public consultation guidelines including CPC- 2-0-03 contact (http://www.ic.gc.ca/epic/site%smt-gst.nsf/en/sf08777e.htmi) or the local Industry Canada office at spectrum.ottawa@ic.gc.ca Radio Frequency Spectrum Management Bell Canada Building Suite C-100 160 Elgin St. Ottawa, Ontario K2P 2P7 Tel: 613-998-3693 3 ROGERS WIRELESS ATTACHMENT TQ 6 3 REPORT # PQ_ D I - 1 General information relating to antenna systems is available on Industry Canada's Spectrum Management and Telecommunications website (http://www.ic.gc.ca/epir,/site/smt-gst.nsf/en/home) Contact Information Rogers Wireless is committed to effective public consultation. The public is invited to provide comments to Rogers Wireless about this proposal by mail, electronic mail, phone or fax. Please send your comments to the address below by the close of business on TO BE DETERMINED Rogers Wireless 8200 Dixie Road, Brampton, Ontario, L6T OC1 Attn: Matthew Milligan matthew.milligan@rci.rogers.com Fax: (647) 747-4600 Phone: (647) 747-4684 Closing Date for Submission of Written Public Comments Industry Canada's rules contain requirements for timely response to your questions, comments or concerns. We will acknowledge receipt of your communication within 14 days and will provide a formal response to the Municipality and those members of the public who communicated to Rogers, within 60 days. The members of the public who communicated with Rogers will then have 21days to review and reply to Rogers a final response. Contact Information - Land Use Authority MUNICIPAL CONTACT: TO BE DETERMINED 4 ROGERS- WIRELESS ATTACHIMENT. # I TO 6 4 REPORT # PQ ~-I Public Comment Record Proposed Telecommunications Installation Rogers Wireless Site Address: Part of Lot 7, Concession 9 Name: Address: Telephone: E-mail: Comments To be considered part of this consultation, comments must be received by close of business To Be Determined. Please forward your comments to: TO BE DETERMINED Rogers Wireless c/o Matthew Milligan 8200 Dixie Road, Brampton, Ontario LIST OC1 Fax: 647-747-4600 Phone: 647-747-4684 E-mail: matthew.milligan@rci.rogers.com Continue on reverse if required... Comments received shall form part of Industry Canada's Public Consultation Process under the Spectrum Management and Telecommunications Client Procedures Circular CPC-2-0-03, Issue 4, and will be made public as part of a report issued to the City of Pickering and Industry Canada. 5 0 ROGERS` WIRELESS ATTACHMENT #-':g TO REPORT # PD 65 cp4 G p. APPROXIMATE Co LOCATION F PROPOSED CELL TWER w Z J - (n REGI AL ROAD 5 TIE WITHIN 180m OF P OPOSED CELL T WER City of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CON 8 N PT LOT 7 NOW, 40R-23061 PART 4 OWNER J. ManOlakOS DATE Oct. 22, 2010 DRAWN BY JB FILE No. PROPOSED ROGERS WIRELESS CELL TOWER SCALE 1:10,000 CHECKED BY TB N ca TeranatrcEn[arprises Ine. and its suppliers. All rights Reserved. Not o plan of 5...y. PN-RUR c 2005 MPAC and its suppliers. All rig M1t. Reserved. Not o plan of Survey. ATTACHMENT TO REPORT # PD_ 6 INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED PLAN ROGERS WIRELESS CELLULAR TOWER INSTALLATION (SIDELINE 8 & REGIONAL ROAD 5) HP 4 ! 4 'too e %'P f 3 fir;, ^ ~Ij . f ~ wits !r • Ydr:--::::tr:rt TOM AssEmy 1~Y-- oFnsEC ~o F~ 6Qm t f N8B0230111 APPROX LU~IH. 98(1006) ssm )167.64 Pty , aF} ~7* :QId:T FENCE 0.4 N 28 A IY r g (.I~ f ~N_~08'00 E (Pt, P2. CALC do SET) 87.02 ESTAausn D FED 02 N sm POST do WIRE FENCE --+c- AS A t js- ~5 PUBItC F9GNWAY y i• IV q 9 MaDEl411i ~ _ 11T CU----_----- - CBAVEI - REGIONAL ROAD #5 p i. THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING 8 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN, NOV 9, 2010. RTTACHMEkIT TO REPORT # RD INFORMATION COMPILED FROM APPLICANT'S 67 SUBMITTED PLAN ROGERS WIRELESS CELLULAR TOWER INSTALLATION (SIDELINE 8 & REGIONAL ROAD 5) El"ATION PLAN NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED GALVANIZED STEEL. SELF SUPPORTING TOWER PAIN COLOUR SUBJECT TO TRANSPORT CANADA REQUIREMENTS. ANTENNA NUUSM AND LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED. E 0 m i i Al THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF PICKERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION MAPPING AND DESIGN, NOV 9, 2010. Excerpts from Pickering News Advertiser of 68 Friday, April 9, 2010 ATTACHMENT # ` _TO REPORT PD_ n ! -1 PUBLIC NOTICE PROPOSED ROGERS WIRELESS 60 METRE TELECOMMUNICATION SELF-SUPPORTED TOWER ANY PERSON may make a written submission to the individual listed below by May, 10, 2010 with respect to this matter.` Approval of this site and its design, is under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Government of Canada through Industry Canada. The City of Pickering has no jurisdiction in this matter other than as a commenting body to Industry Canada and the applicant: For more information contact the local Industry Canada office at 613-998-3693. SITE DETAILS Self-Supported Telecommunication p 0 Tower 60 metres in height E I Tower Location: North side of SITE Concession No. 9 approximately 130 metres west of Sideline No. 6 c o" • Part of Lot 7, Concession No. 9 a Geographic Township of Pickering, crnREMOW 'DO Now the City of Pickering _ ' Site Coordinates (NAD 83): N43-59-10.0 e W079-04-23.5 • The facility will include mechanical equipment cabinets and fencing around the base of the tower. The Municipal Contact. Please forward all comments and tower will provide wireless voice and requests for additional information to the data services. Tyler Barnett _ following individual. City of Pickering One The Esplanade Matthew Milligan, MCIP, RPP - Road Rogers ROGERS Pickering, Ontario 8200 Dixie Road L1V 6K7 8200 Dixie Tel (905),420 4660 ext 2042 - - Brampton, Ontario Fax (906j420 7648 LU Oct tbarriett@cityofpickering com Tel (647) 747684 Fax (647} 747-4600 Email: matthew.milligan@rci.rogers.com ATTACHMENT # (O TO 6 9 ROG ERS REPORT # PD_- Rogers Wireless Partnership 8200 Dixie Road Brampton, Ontario L6T OC1 August 6, 2010 Tyler Barnett I Planner AUG 1 0 2010 City of Pickering One The Esplanade CITY OF PICKERIN Pickering, Ontario RLANN DEPARTMEN VELOPMEXT L1V 6K7 Dear Mr. Barnett: Re: Rogers Site "9th Concession & 6th Sideline", C3673 Proposed Telecommunications Tower - 9th Concession and 6th Sideline Part of Lot 7, Concession 9 (North Side of the 9th Concession west of the 6th sideline.) I am writing to follow-up on the public consultation that has taken place for our proposed telecommunications site at the above reference location and to request a statement of concurrence from Council. This statement of concurrence will be provided to Industry Canada to conclude the consultation. Rogers Wireless is regulated and licensed by Industry Canada to provide inter-provincial wireless and data services. As a federal undertaking, Rogers is required by Industry Canada to consult with land-use authorities in siting tower locations. The consultation process established under Industry Canada's authority is intended to allow the local land- use authorities and the public the opportunity to address land-use concerns while respecting the federal government's exclusive jurisdiction in the siting and operation of wireless and data systems. The provisions of the Ontario Planning Act and other municipal by-laws and regulations do not apply to federal undertakings, Rogers is however required to follow established and documented wireless protocols or processes set forth by land-use authorities. In instances where those established and documented processes do not exist, Rogers must follow Industry Canada's Default Consultation Process; CPC-2-0-03 (Issue 4) which was previously supplied to the Township. Public Notification In accordance with Industry Canada's CPC a circulation was undertaken with owners within three times the height of the tower ((60m x 3) = 180 metres) from the site as illustrated in the site information package supplied in our package dated February 25, W;REI..ESS m CABLE TV ~ INTERNET HOME PHONE RETAIL. a PUBLISHING m BROADCASTING ATTACHMENT TO REPORT # PD (7 70 2010. In addition a public notice was placed in the Pickering News Advertiser on April 9, 2010. As a result of the public notification there were no responses. Conclusion and Request For Concurrence Rogers feels that the proposed site is properly located on the subject lands to provide improved wireless voice and data services in the targeted area. In order to conclude this landuse consultation and meet Industry Canada's requirements, Rogers Wireless is requesting that that Town Council issue a Statement of Concurrence that Rogers will provide to Industry Canada. If you require further information about this matter, please feel free to contact me at anytime. We look forward to providing enhanced wireless services in the City of Pickering. Yours truly, Ro ers Cications Inc. Matthe MCIP, RPP Site Acquisition Specialist. C: Industry Canada Debbie Shields, Clerk - City of Pickering Report To Planning & Development Committee PICKERING Report Number: PD 02-11 Date: January 4, 2011 71 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: Proposed Demolition of Listed Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Recommendation: 1. That Report PD 02-11 of the Director, Planning & Development respecting the proposed demolition by Transport Canada of nine structures listed on the Heritage Register, be received for information; 2. That the Federal Minister of Transportation be advised that the City of Pickering is concerned about the destruction of cultural heritage resources on the Pickering Lands Site; 3. That the Federal Minister of Transportation be requested to refrain from demolishing seven listed structures of heritage value, and particularly the two structures at 635 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road and 5245 Sideline 28 noted within this report as having a high level of cultural heritage significance, until a decision regarding future plans for the Pickering Lands Site has been made and the potential for preservation of these structures can be fully considered; 4. That the Federal Minister of Transportation be requested to fully reimburse the City for its costs to undertake detailed heritage assessments of the nine buildings which are the subject of this report, and to fund future assessments required for the additional (100) buildings identified on the City of Pickering Heritage Register that are located on the Pickering Lands Site; 5. That Transport Canada be asked to reconvene the Local Heritage Steering Committee to complete its mandate to develop a heritage strategy for buildings deemed locally significant; and 6. Further, that the City Clerk forward a copy of Report PD 02-11 and resolution to the Federal Minister of Transportation, the Regional Director, Programs and Pickering Lands Branch, Transport Canada, the Region of Durham, the Region of York, the Towns of Markham and Uxbridge, MP Mark Holland and MPP Joe Dickson and the MPs and MPPs for Markham and Uxbridge. Executive Summary: In August 2010, Transport Canada informed the City of its intention to demolish 41 structures on the federally owned lands within the Pickering Lands Site (see Attachment #2). Report PD 02-11 January 4, 2011 Subject: Proposed Demolition of Listed Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 2 72 Nine of the 41 structures identified for demolition are listed on the City of Pickering Heritage Register as being of cultural heritage value or interest (see Location Map - Attachment #1). At the City's request, Transport Canada agreed to refrain from demolishing the nine historical structures until the end of January, 2011 to allow staff to undertake a detailed assessment of the structures, and to allow City Council the opportunity to review the assessment and provide further direction to staff (see Attachments #3 and #4). Staff appreciate the cooperation of Transport Canada in notifying the City of its demolition plans, and agreeing to delay the demolition of buildings of local heritage interest. In November 2010, the City retained a consulting team consisting of Martindale Planning Services in association with John Sabean and Gordon Zimmerman, to undertake an assessment of the nine heritage structures to identify their structural and historical significance. The assessments concluded that two of the nine buildings listed on the Heritage Register do not warrant preservation, but that seven buildings merit preservation. The original sections of the remaining seven houses are considered sound and could still be restored. Two houses in particular (635 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road and 5245 Sideline 28) are considered to be of sufficient cultural heritage significance to warrant in-situ preservation. Given the level of cultural heritage. significance of these seven buildings, and particularly the two noted buildings, staff recommend that the Federal Minister of Transportation be advised of Council's concern regarding the destruction of local cultural heritage resources and request that Transport Canada refrain from demolishing the buildings until a decision regarding the future plans for the Pickering Lands Site has been made. In addition to the nine properties considered in this report, there are approximately 100 more structures within the Pickering Lands Site that are listed on the City's Heritage Register as buildings of heritage interest. Staff recommend that the City request that Transport Canada reinstate the Local Heritage Steering Committee or equivalent, and fully fund future assessments necessary to gain a greater understanding of the cultural heritage resources existing on the Pickering Lands Site. In the meantime, it is recommended that Heritage Pickering continue with the ongoing assessment of the heritage buildings on the Pickering Lands Site, as resources permit, so that notification of any future demolitions can be dealt with by Council in a timely manner. Financial Implications: Consultants were retained to undertake a cultural heritage assessment of the nine properties identified for demolition by Transport Canada that are included on the City's Heritage Register. The study was funded from the Planning & Development Department's 2010 general consulting budget as approved by Council, and in accordance with the City's purchasing standards. Staff recommend that Transport Canada fully reimburse the City for the costs it incurred to undertake detailed heritage assessments of these nine buildings. I Report PD 02-11 January 4, 2011 Subject: Proposed Demolition of Listed Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 3 73 Additional costs will be incurred by the City should it undertake assessments for an additional 100 identified heritage properties within the Pickering Lands. Staff recommend that Transport Canada be requested to fully fund the City's costs for these assessments. Sustainability Implications: This Report provides information relating to the objective of preserving buildings having cultural heritage value as an integral part of a sustainable City. In addition to the historical physical value of the buildings, the buildings also have a social value in that they form part of the community of northwest Pickering. Preservation and re-use of the buildings would also divert materials from landfill sites. 1.0 Background: 1.1 Nine structures of heritage interest situated on the federally owned Pickering Lands Site property have been identified by Transport Canada for demolition In August 2010, Transport Canada informed the City of Pickering of its intention to demolish 41 structures on the. federally owned lands within the Pickering Lands Site. The Pickering Lands Site consists of lands in north Pickering that are being reserved by the federal government for a possible future airport. It is staff's understanding that this demolition contract is one of a series of demolitions to be undertaken in the future. Nine of the 41 structures identified for demolition are listed on the City of Pickering Heritage Register. Transport Canada's position with respect to the treatment of heritage structures is that they are bound to recognize only buildings having federal historical significance. For buildings with local heritage significance, Transport Canada will allow the documentation of the structures, and the removal of parts or all of the structures for preservation elsewhere (e.g. Pickering Museum), with the understanding that any of these strategies for preservation would be undertaken by municipalities or local interest groups at their cost. Vacant heritage buildings not removed by others are scheduled for demolition even if found to have local heritage value. At the City's request, Transport Canada agreed to refrain from demolishing the nine historical structures until the. end of January, 2011 to allow staff to undertake a detailed assessment of the structures, and to allow City Council the opportunity to review the assessment and provide further direction to staff. Demolition permits were recently issued for the 32 non-heritage structures. Staff appreciate the cooperation of Transport Canada in notifying the City of its demolition plans, and agreeing to delay the demolition of buildings of local heritage interest. I~ Report PD 02-11 January 4, 2011 Subject: Proposed Demolition of Listed Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 4 74 The nine heritage structures are located at the following addresses: • 429 Eighth Concession Road _ • 140 Seventh Concession Road • 5165 Sideline 22 • 5050 Sideline 24 • 1095 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road • 840 Eighth Concession Road • 5245 Sideline 28 • 635 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road • 5413 Sideline 30 1.2 Heritage assessments have been undertaken In November 2010, the City retained a consulting team consisting of Martindale Planning Services in association with John Sabean and Gordon Zimmerman, to undertake an assessment of the nine heritage structures to identify their structural and historical significance. The consultants were asked to provide the following for each of the properties having heritage interest: • a description of the property • a statement of the Cultural Heritage Attributes of the property including: o Historical and Associative Value o Contextual Value o Physical Value o Significant Architectural Attributes • a map showing the context of the property • photographs of the structure within its setting and • photographs and descriptions of the interior as appropriate Site visits took place during the last week of November, 2010. 2.0 Discussion: 2.1 Two of the nine buildings listed on the Heritage Register do not warrant preservation The buildings identified for demolition at 425-429 Eighth Concession Road and 5413 Sideline 30 do not warrant preservation. Two houses are located on the single property at 425 - 429 Eighth Concession Road. The structure identified for demolition (429 Eighth Concession Road) was found to have no heritage value (see Attachment #5). The house at 425 Eighth Concession Road is the structure identified in the Heritage Registry as being of heritage interest. It is currently tenanted and is not proposed to be demolished at this time. Report PD 02-11 January 4, 2011 Subject: Proposed Demolition of Listed Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 5 75 With respect to 5413 Sideline 30, the investigation concluded that significant external and internal renovations and high levels of internal mould and physical damage have made the house unworthy of preservation (see Attachment #6). 2.2 Seven of the nine buildings listed on the Heritage Register merit conservation and potential future designation The remaining seven buildings were found to merit preservation and potential future designation. Two of the seven (635 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road and 5245 Sideline 28) were found to be of high cultural heritage value. The following are summaries of the assessments for each property. The complete assessment reports are available at the Planning & Development Department. 635 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road This house is one of a set of six "workers" houses that together form the eastern gateway into the hamlet of Altona. The houses are rumored to have been built for the six sons of the original settler. The set of houses together form a cultural heritage landscape of a type that is very rarely found in rural Ontario and that is identified in architectural heritage resource documents as warranting further research and evaluation. The original part of this house is still sound. The later one-storey addition to the rear is in disrepair and for safety reasons and longer term preservation of the original structure, should be removed. This house is very important as an integral part of this cultural heritage feature (see Attachment #7). 5245 Sideline 28 This house is of plank-on-plank construction, a construction form that was infrequently employed in North America in the mid 19th Century. It is quite large for the style of construction and although all of the cladding has been removed from the exterior, only a small section of the exterior lumber wall is showing signs of rot. Although the front of the house is of a centre hall (three bay) plan, the rear was originally divided into two rooms (two bays). Two doors, possibly original, led to a side veranda. Very early renovation of the main floor resulted in changes to the rear partition wall locations, but the interior finishes and trim are quite unique in design and profile, and remain very largely intact. The uniqueness of the structure, its original high quality construction and current soundness underscore its tremendous value as a permanent structure in the community. This building should be retained and restored (see Attachments #8 and #9). 1095 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road This small residence may have been the home of the local blacksmith. The original building is still structurally sound. A later back addition is in disrepair and should be removed for long term preservation of the original structure and for safety reasons (see Attachment #10). Report PD 02-11 January 4, 2011 Subject: Proposed Demolition of Listed Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 6 76 5050 Sideline 24 A building of very significant heritage value with high quality exterior and interior finishes and few alterations affecting the heritage elements of the structure is located on this property. This building sustained fire damage in recent years. The rear kitchen addition is in extremely poor shape and should be removed and preferably replaced, but areas of the original main house are still sound and the structure could be restored despite the fire damage. Valuable salvageable material may be removed from the structure for use at the Pickering Museum if the building is to be demolished .(see Attachment #11). 5165 Sideline 22 A unique construction technique and floor plan were discovered in the house at this location. The building was originally built as a one-storey plank-on-plank house (see Attachment #9) having two doors located in the centre of the north and south facades each of which were connected to vestibules leading into two large rooms on the east and west sides of the house. The house was subsequently modified with a second storey and back kitchen additions. Due to structural compromises occurring through the renovation process, the exterior walls are considerably bowed. Restoration to the original house would still be possible, however. The Pickering Museum may also find some useful salvageable materials in this structure for display and maintenance purposes (see Attachment #12).. 840 Eighth Concession Road This residence has only recently been vacated. It has floor to ceiling front room windows and a less than common fan light window above the front door. The cellar stairs have been removed and the interior rear of the house has undergone significant renovation, but the house is still considered sound and could be restored with a relatively small.financial investment (see Attachment #13). 140 Seventh Concession Road The house at this location is in good condition with the exception of later front and side deck additions. The interior has undergone some renovation. Attractive, possibly original barge boards and a centre gable finial as well as original interior trim still speak to its former quality. Still structurally sound, this building could be restored (see Attachment #14). Given the level of cultural heritage significance of these seven buildings, and particularly the two buildings at 635 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road and 5245 Sideline 28, staff recommend that the Federal Minister of Transportation be advised of Councirs concern regarding the destruction of local cultural heritage resources and request that the Transport Canada refrain from demolishing the buildings until a decision regarding the future plans for the Pickering Lands Site has been made. Delaying demolition of heritage structures until the land needs of a future airport are known would prevent the unnecessary destruction of valuable heritage resources if the properties are ultimately returned to private ownership. Report PD 02-11 January 4, 2011 Subject: Proposed Demolition of Listed Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 7 77 2.3 Proposed strategy for assessing additional heritage structures on the Pickering Lands Site In addition to the nine properties considered in this report, there are approximately 100 more structures within the Pickering Lands Site that are listed on the City's Heritage Register as buildings of heritage interest. While some are still occupied, a number of the buildings are vacant and boarded and are not being maintained. The City does not currently have a strategy for dealing with these buildings. Although Heritage Pickering is working through the properties listed on the Heritage Register to identify those worthy of designation under the Ontario Heritage Act, funding and resources are limited. In addition, the current Transport Canada position regarding certain demolition of locally significant heritage structures limits the City's strategy to documentation and salvage only, in the absence of funding and alternative sites for relocation of the building. Transport Canada, in response to concerns from local heritage groups and Municipalities in 2005, had indicated a willingness to work with municipalities through the creation of a Local Heritage Steering Committee to develop a strategy for structures determined to have local heritage significance. This action resulted from the proposed demolition of the Tullis Cottage (also known as the Barclay House) in Pickering at the time. The Steering Committee had representation from the City of Pickering and the Towns of Markham and Uxbridge. Transport Canada provided funding at that time to undertake the assessments of some of the identified structures. Although a working sub-committee met on several occasions to prioritize a list of heritage resources and begin to undertake evaluations, the work was never completed, and the Steering Committee has never re-convened. Staff recommend that the City request that Transport Canada reinstate the Local Heritage Steering Committee or equivalent, and fully fund future assessments necessary to gain a greater understanding of the cultural heritage resources existing on the Pickering Lands Site. In the meantime, it is recommended that Heritage Pickering continue with the ongoing assessment of the heritage buildings on the Pickering Lands Site, as resources permit, so that notification of any future demolitions can be dealt with by Council in a timely manner. Report PD 02-11 January 4, 2011 Subject: Proposed Demolition of Listed Heritage Structures on Federal Lands Page 8 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Letter from Transport Canada advising City of proposed demolitions 3. Staff's request to Transport Canada to defer demolition of structures having heritage interest 4. Transport Canada's agreement to the City's requests 5. 429 Eighth Concession Road - Photo 6. 5413 Sideline 30 Photo 7. 635 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road - Photo 8. 5245 Sideline 28 - Photo 9. Illustration of plank-on-plank construction technique 10. 1095 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road Photo 11. 5050 Sideline 24 - Photo 12. 5165 Sideline 22 - Photo 13. 840 Eighth Concession Road - Photo 14. 140 Seventh Concession Road - Photo Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: i Isa Jm~e's, MCIP; RPP Neil Carrol , .C, RPP Planner II Director, Pla Wing & Development Marg.Wouters, MCIP, RPP Manager, Development Review & Urban Design IJ:Id Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering C' Coun it 2®, 2610 Tony Prevedel, P.Eng. Chief Administrative Officer ATTACHMENT # TO REPORT # PD_ da-I 79 r VoWSHMOP of UMMU MIE 1 635 1095 .n 5245 5165 505 a 0 0 a 429 • F- 02 140 Land Use Subject Property Ot of Pickering Planning & Development Department PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Various Properties OWNER: Transport Canada FILE No: Heritage Demolitions DATE: Oct. 19,2 010 C ~aa bere~6Rarp .incan 4 eu0arm/U ri~ta Reaenetl.~a~a~a awa,. SCALE: 1:34,639 c3108 hPAC ergi6a erm.All' aResare tl. NOla en ol5we L 80 Transport Canada Transports Canada ITT<tCfitiPt!liT 0 Ontario Region Rogion de I'Ontario PENUE3? # PQ C?o?' Programs and Pickering Lands Programmes et biens-fonds de Pickering Ontario Region Region de ('Ontario 4900 Yonge St., 4`' Floor 4900, rue Yonge. 4ieme etage Toronto, Ontario Toronto. Ontario M2N 6A5 M2N 6A5 August 19, 2010 Debbie Shields City Clerk, Legal & Legislative Services Division City of Pickering One The Esplanade Pickering, ON L1V 6K7 Dear Ms. Shields: Please be advised that Transport Canada intends to.undertake demolition activity on numerous structures situated on the federally owned Pickering Lands Site property, located within the municipal boundaries of the City of Pickering. The structures in question are all currently vacant, each having access restriction barriers in place to prevent vehicle access, however, each remains accessible by foot. The structures pose obvious hazards to individuals who frequently, whether authorized or illegally, attempt to access the properties or view them from close proximity. Transport. Canada is committed to ensuring that structures on the Pickering Lands Site do not compromise the safety of tenants, members of the general public, Transport Canada's employees or agents. For this reason, I recently had the opportunity to meet with the City's Chief Administrative Officer as well as the City's Director of the Planning & Development Department, to discuss the aforementioned, as well as our intentions of proceeding with this imminent demolition undertaking. It is our understanding that seven (7) locations may be of local interest to the City. As a result we will delay the removal of these structures until the latter stages of the project this fiscal year, thereby allowing the City the opportunity to undertake any internal assessments it deems necessary. Transport Canada continues to support information sharing and working in a collaborative manner with our neighbouring municipal partners such as the City of Pickering. To this end I have enclosed a listing (Annex "A"), outlining each location where structures are scheduled for removal this fiscal year. Should you require any further information. please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours truly, D~ r Perry Papadatos, Regional Manager, Pickering Site Operations c.c. Neil Carroll. Director, Planning & Development Department. City of Pickering EncL Annex "A" na a ~ Transport Canada Transports Canada ATTACHMENT REPORT # PD # TO Oa / $ _ Ontario Region Region de I'Ontario Annex "A" F-7- PIN Municipality Address Roll Number 614247.10 Pickering 13725 Sideline 26 030-003-18500 614272.10 Pickerin '3855 Sideline 32 030-003-15300 1614289.00 _ Pickering 1'3825 York/Durham Line 030-003-15600 _ 11614291 00 Pickering 1845 York/Durham I.ine 030-003-15400 614309.00 Pickering ;1620 Concession 7 030••009-04600 614335.00 ;Pickering _ '1405 Concession 8 030-001-34100 1614337.00 :Pickering _ L375 Concession 8 030-001-34300 ;614351.00 ;Pickering 4120 Sideline 24 030-003-02600 ;614382.00 _ 'Pickering 14300 Sideline 28 030-001-39200 614385D0 Pickering _ 4370 Sideline 28 030-001-38900 _ `614386.00 Pickering _ x'4380 Sideline 28 030-001-38800 X614397 30 Pickering /129 Concession 8 030-001-40600 _ 1614404 00 'Pickering 315 Concession 8 X030-001 41300 1614413.00 iPickering 180 Concession 7 _ 030-003-06410 X614414 10__ _Pickering 140 Concession 7 1030-003-06400 1614424 10 Pickering 4780 Brock Road '030 002 10000 !614450.00 Pickering ;4975 Sideline 24 030-001-18100 1614464.00 Pickering 1,4965 Sideline 28 1030-001-19800 ,_L..__.._...,...._._._ _.1,..k - `614477.00 Pickering 14950 Sideline 28 030-001-20000 _ 1614516.00 Pickering ±4655 York/Durham Line ?030-001-33200 1614517.00 Pickering '4665 York/Durham Line X030-001-33100 1614518.00 Pickering 4675 York/Durham Line ;030-001-33000 _ i614521.00 Pickering ?4705 York/Durha.m Line 1030-001-32700 _ 614531.10 Pickering 195 Concession 9 1,030-001-22200 j614538.10 Pickering !5165 Sideline 22 =030-001-10810 614553.10 Pickering 15050 Sideline 24 ;030-001-11510 , 614560.00 Pickering _ _ 11095 U/P Townline_ _ '030-001-02100 61. 5255 Sideline 26 E1030-001-03300 a566.00 3..._. 614568.00 Pickering 15315 Sideline 26 :030-001-03100 614586.00 Pickering 15115 Sideline 28 030-001-12400 i 614597.00 Pickering _ '5450 Sideline 28 030-001-05100 614599.00 Plckerin~ _ 5480 Sideline 28 1030-001-04900 ! 614610.00 IPickerin :';5255 Sideline 30 '030-001-06700 614616.00 (Pickerin 15455 North Road 1030-001-06200 ;614661.00 ;Pickerin 13505 Brack Road 1030-009-27100 Canaaa 82 ATTACHI ENT # C TO Transport Canada I ransports Canada REPOR 1 # PD Ong J I r' Ontario Region Region de I'Ontario E814695.00 Pickering 368rouham Road 1030-009-18200 _..4-5. :614339 Pickering Barn Only 3030-001-34700 '614458.30 Pickerin 840 Concession 8 :030 001-26700 _.4_._..___......... ;614588 Pickering 5245 Sideline 30 030-001-121.00 ,614598.10 Pickering- _ 635xU/P Townline '030-001-05700 Z1461 1.10 Pickering 15413 Sideline 30 030-001-06400 END. Canad'a" C[t✓1 00 Pickering Civic Complex One The Esplanade I Pickering, Ontario Canada L1V 6K7 Direct Access 905.420.4660 PTCKERING Toll Free 1.866.683.2760 cityofpickering.com I _ .NNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 8 3 Department 905.420.4617 ATTACHPJiENT # Facsimile 905.420.7648 REPORT ~ PD vol ) ~ Q TTY 905.420.11739 739 plan&devl@cityofpickering.com September 29, 2010 Perry Papadatos Regional Manager, Pickering Site Operations Programs and Pickering Lands Transport Canada, Ontario Region 4900 Yonge Street, 4th Floor Toronto, ON M2N 6A5 Subject: Transport Canada Notification of Intention to Demolish 41 Structures - File: A-3300-005 We have had an opportunity to review your letter of August 19, 2010, advising the City Clerk of Transport Canada's intention to demolish 41 structures situated on the federally owned Pickering Lands Site property. The letter also indicates that the demolition of seven structures identified as being of local interest to the City will be delayed until the latter stages of the demolition project, in order to give the City time to undertake any necessary assessments. Nine of the 41 structures listed in your August 19, 2010 letter are included in the Pickering Heritage Register. These nine properties are identified on the listing attached to this letter. At our meeting on August 12, 2010, Transport Canada advised that it would be applying to the City for demolition permits for all structures, to be demolished, and would follow Provincial legislative protocol with respect to notification prior to demolishing the structures listed on the Heritage Register. The Ontario Heritage Act provides for a 60 day notification period to allow municipalities to review demolition requests. In this case, the 60 day notification period would lapse in mid-October 2010. We respectfully request that Transport Canada refrain from demolishing the nine structures in question until the end of January 2011 in order for City staff to undertake a detailed assessment of the nine structures, and to allow City Council the opportunity to review the assessment and provide further direction.. Due to the upcoming municipal election, City Council will not have the opportunity to formally comment respecting these nine structures until mid-January 2011. Transport Canada's Advisement of Intention to Demolish September 29, 2010 ATTACHAAENIT # TO Page 2 84 REPORT # PD 4a-~ Should retention of the structures in their original state not be a viable option, we further request permission for City staff or its agents to enter onto the lands in order to document the structures and to be granted salvage rights so that significant structural and decorative elements that may be identified be made available to the Pickering Museum. We thank you for your consideration and look forward to your response. Yours truly Neil Carrol , IP, RPP Director, Planning & Development Department IJ:jf J:WAFNamesWentaBeTerty Papadatos Sept 23 Fed demas.doc - - Attachment Copy: Mayor Ryan Members of Council . Chief Administrative Officer Director, Operations & Emergency Services City Clerk Supervisor, Building Permits i ATTACHIPOENT # TO REPORT # PD__ 85 Structures on Heritage Register to be Demolished by Transport Canada PIN Address Roll Number 614397.30 425-429 Eighth Concession Road 030-001-40600 614414.10 140 Seventh Concession Road 030-001-06400 614538.10 5165 Sideline 22 030-001-10810 614553.10 5050 Sideline 24 030-001-11510 614560.00 1095 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road 030-001-02100 614458.30 871 Eighth Concession Road (840) 030-001-26700 614588.00 5245 Sideline 28 (not Sideline 30) 030-001-12100 614598.10 635 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road 030-001-05700 614611.10 5413 Sideline 30 030-001-06400 JASTAMjamesW eritageWttachmeet 'A' Transport Canada Transports Canada Ontario Region Region de ('Ontario ATTACH -DENT # 8 REPORT # PD C~a-/I TO Neil Carroll Director' Planning and Development Department a ya3 Pickering Civic Complex One The Esplanade DinLcrinn nKI L1V 6K7~~y+:,~^;a DEPA',RTM NT October 12, 2010 Dear Mr. Carroll, Thank you for your correspondence of September 29, 2010, regarding Transport Canada's plan to demolish 41 vacant structures situated on the Pickering Lands within the City of Pickering. We are happy to comply with your request to delay the demolition of the nine structures identified in the Pickering Heritage Register until the end of January, 2011. However, as it will not be possible to delay the demolition beyond this point, we' would urge you to move forward with your assessment of the properties well before this time. Demolition or removal of these structures must take place before March 31, 2010, therefore appropriate lead time. must be set aside to complete preparatory work. Transport Canada is certainly amenable to allowing City staff or City agents on to federal property to inspect the structures in order to document and salvage materials if desired. Again, please proceed with any inspections well before January 2011. Please contact Perry Papadatos, Regional Manager, Pickering Site Operations, at 416-952- 4068 for all questions or concerns related to accessing these structures. Yours sincerely, Rob Berge ' Regional or, Programs and Pickering Lands Branch Ontario Region Transport Canada 3 Y e P F - i uTTACHMENT # TO REPUR? # PD Q-2-77 V't 14, 87 11 ~ ~4 q - _ 0 r. t° - 71 W y. t. i _ Fri- Iff a, s ~r > 7 1 1 5 r k, ~ I ' s j .y a 429 Eighth Concession Road 1 .r L,if cilT # 6 TO R T # PCB f s 7 ~ " a I ,t f` Rrn `f t' G ,a i r t ~`i" Sl ~ J~ir f ~ . t ti ~ ~ ~ ~c"`. ti , ~ ^..^.~„rra~.-,. , 11' ~ .~1~~ r t ~ . ~ ` . r ~ • ~ 1 1 _ mac,"" " r° ~ Et , ' , f ~ z _-w 1 a'. i• r------,^...^-, f r 1~ 5 ~~f 1 r W ~1 F3 ~ ~y i ~YA Y •3y r,~` 7 t~'7~',' pity#~S ` ~ _.s, , ~ ,':.~y ' ,".a ~,,,f k ,4rlt( Yi~ ~S:CkfF y4~ ei 1 ptr i ~I R 4hi~ t'r« r y I ii~.. 5413 Sideline 30 1 E Huh # TO T~. /r'~IF H~ ILlt.f p_ s ~POF1 # PD G Jl 89 3 c!t r .t t F t II ju, ALI' c.. y, .yfi 3a of 1 ; \71 A. ; 'Ail 4 Y s. _ T ti~ ~ ak ~w g. l T ~ sJ~'~ 635 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road /,T1ACHIMENT# TO PEPUR7 t I ~ ~S } T ~ 7 ~ y..~► ~ r~. ;~~t~ ~s 'fl7B'; s ^~l". itr' F ~T~. ~ ; s {s-` zo, ~ -~5 wi ~ ,-~7'~'^' , t sw~ ~ MiL'~~~ ""Y°' f1~~ r'! .4 < ~ ` ,~c~ ~ i r F Y _ ' ~ liS ; ~ < ~3ai►.. tom,, r j~y~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ - ,f4 } F.. I: ♦ 'rat ~ e ~1 0 ,F:~~~~ M k F < I t`' 5 'i T 1 \ N ~ el, " t' l 5245 Sideline 28 ATTACHMENT / TO REPORT # PD 91 knnwitno*+rlurv(:kr 01"m pr-11" who ruffrxr, ra rrc rrdmiqt", ""ifvn of YO& r ir. U+ rasrrf~iel. tm.1.4, si' IeSa' ec9ttrx +scu.a,rr. -J, v3; tj *crrrvv, r: ~ . n 4: r nt r+a Uaroi1'M k`~a»~i~ ~x a,a«3r~, ~ , `•i = Ftwni,,, vr6,, 1?`-A ~,*q to cork da,. i -W, : PUP Y! ~a3 'ter z 5'. 1 a~'t~8'X1~1.~~-0r~Xt. ~it[Cix,I ~Jl~, 4 lit Y~' L~_,{„s ~'+1' 3 gri~bf`~l ii t f.7r! P. i sGs~a~c+rrz;h a ;;r,krr r mr t ~aFr. 1 f ~r .7r-~s a rr,~.k;, LI-vint with Plant Houses tSru lu.r crs: <,r,~.Ril } 1 .3. r~e> rah E .,r w sry a hu or 41T rn O err tier g.~ +~r sap A fiurnrl'r rnJ,r, 1,144,1 t"e n stArI`N Caresi 1; MN 11 ~i .,,"ir -i~r v ' fWI,ell,tw'>z. h4,c~PtYC tr~:rga',ie* Star t3 at2:t. .h' , r~..,._«,u,~.rr.; lxr =.,rt rr I-,,If th".r Fe a:~r ra bu A'A~- rr a i.. ~e iuc IUviva! -:,r ~r 9 alts z r:, 4' arUrsrwstu7 c-04, ipcrofit irvu- aSk.~~ I£Y ~.r^4r:'4f wb'm~~ Seal 0f0jtl! ~~.r. i i* Lai'a, at• ~;.~.t u. - .,~f ,Icnr~l~z.r1!:~rR ~dir•'*tfre f,r~r~ . t 'a bm any. WJ& m ahc * c r , V7 mban t F nv GIs am i cr.-,rear nu w a salra i r l 6.A1T-+•~~ L.I.h N ryx_'! Y. E r << 4AD 77- ITIACHMENT#_ TO 9 REPORT # PD. k ~g. . to f: . e J ~ aA, r x. 1 1095 Uxbridge Pickering Townline Road r w. e V ~ A TI NGHIvIENT # 70 REPURT # PD c -L( r ► - 93 ~ T a I ' ,I VA, ~`11 a • a t . t i T _ c ar. t r r~ ` •s Y Y III ~aT x ~4 `fir 1~t t x `y t: ~y~ 5050 Sideline 24 REPUR i # PD 062"// P ~ 3 k W 1i t r CC ' ~ } Il 1I s r IT J } , 11V { _ t- 1 _ t. E ' 7 r.. ~ + 1 f ~ ~a 1 h .s R max' y '1 4 t t i Y 5165 Sideline 22 AT1 RCCHIMENT # TO REPURI # PD-/ 9 5: . C: n . { i j gg l JT R L w !,t n -A I I { 1 f Pt="` T y y I~ {J` F. 840 Eighth Concession Road ATTACHMENT # f TO 96 REPORT # RCS i r ~ 1 , t If r r~l; s~ v~ , 0-0411 i t s a~ i i :N! G~ ri`M yfJ . 1 3 r~' ,T r, irU ~'Fj t f~' ..'-'~yY~'•r ~~i:~.~...-._;!~'~`~vo~.,' _ ~ I ~ I.c~, ~II +~,!'~~1',t % a P fa` ~ t' ~ rs t T }f 4 140 Seventh Concession Road J~