HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/11/1992
STATUTORY PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING MINUTES
A Statutory Public Information Meeting pursuant to Section 34 of the
Pl anni ng Act was hel d by the Pi ckeri ng Town Council on Monday, May
11, 1992 at 7:45 p.m.
--
PRESENT:
Acting Mayor Maurice Brenner
COUNCILLORS:
R. Johnson
E. Pi stritto
K. Van Kempen
D. Wellman
ABSENT:
Mayor Arthurs (ill)
Councillor Higdon (vacation)
"
ALSO PRESENT:
C.M.T. Sheffield
B. Taylor
N. Carroll
T. Melymuk
C. Rose
L. Taylor
J. McCarthy
V. Rodrigues
- Acting Town Manager
- Town Clerk
- Director of Planning
- Deputy Director of Planning
- Manager, Policy Division
- Manager, Current Operations Division
- Planner
- Planner
(I) REZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 20/91
SUBMITTED BY ERICOLE RAPONI, IN TRUST IN PART
OF LOTS 10 AND 11, PLAN 282
1. An explanation of the application, as outlined in
Informati on Report 8/92, was given by Jennifer McCarthy,
Planner.
......
2. Harol d Bolt, representi ng the Raponi Brothers, stated that
the proposed lots will have a minimum of 15 metres frontage
and all lots will be larger in size than is required by the
zoning by-law. Mr. Raponi is a custom builder and he has
asked the Region to create seven lots by land severance.
3. Jim Morrison, 1803 Woodview Avenue, stated that his
property is to the south of the subject lands and that lot
depths on the proposal are 120 feet which is different from
his lot which is 165 feet deep.
4. Kathy Hubbard, 1839 Woodview Avenue, stated that the depths
of the lots on Oakburn Street are 120 feet which is similar
to the proposal. She stated that she does not want to see
an easement through the subject lands to provide sewers for
owners who have Woodview Avenue frontage.
continued
'-"
2
5.
.....
Alex Charabaruk, 1800 Woodview Avenue, stated that when the
Woodview Avenue frontage is developed, he hopes it will
conform to the existing lots.
6. Harol d Bolt, representing the Raponi Brothers, stated that
sanitary sewers are already installed on Oakburn Street and
hi s cl i ents have no pl ans for devel opi ng thei r Woodvi ew
Avenue frontage. The depths of the proposed lots are
consistent with other lots on Oakburn Street.
(II) DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 18T-91018
REZONING APPLICATION A 19/91 SUBMITTED
BY COUGS INVESTMENTS (PICKERING) LTD.
IN PART OF LOTS 1 TO 8, PLAN 395 AND
PART OF LOT 34, PLAN 350
1. An explanation of the application, as outlined in
Information Report 9/92, was given by Valerie Rodrigues,
Planner.
....
2.
Mary Doucet, 556 Rougemount Drive, stated that she lives
next to the proposed temporary access road and is concerned
about damage to her home. She requested that she get a
guarantee from the developer to reimburse her for any
damage done to her property. She was told twelve years ago
that the road to service the subject lands would lead in
from Toynevale Road.
3. Ann Butler, 552 Rougemount Drive, asked if a fence will be
installed where is abuts other private property and if that
fence would be installed at the full cost of the developer.
4. Jack Curley asked why a temporary road is needed when a
roadway from Toynevale Road has been designated.
5. Mrs. Gentile, 332 Toynevale Road, stated that her driveway
will be across from the access from Toynevale Road and felt
that the temporary access from Rougemount Dri ve shoul d be
made permanent.
6.
--
Adrian Hines, 541 Pine Ridge Road, stated that there should
be more than one entrance to the subject 1 ands and fel t
that the density of the site was too great.
7. Mike Gentile, 332 Toynevale Road, stated that it was
dangerous to have only one access to the subject lands from
Toynevale Road.
8. Frank Langston, 562 Wi nette Road, stated that he will not
be able to develop his property in the future as a result
of this development.
9. Len Hollinger stated that he is opposed to the temporary
access road and is opposed to the kink in the road that
leads in from Toynevale Road.
continued
~
10.
'-"
11.
'-
3
Bob Wiley, 554 Rougemount Drive, stated that there is only
one access into the Rosebank nei ghbourhood and was
concerned that thi s proposal wi 11 add to the current poor
traffi c si tuati on. The pl an for the subject 1 ands has
changed over the years and has weakened the residents'
resolve to oppose it. The Rosebank neighbourhood is a
unique community and the developer should accept this.
There should be no further development in the Rosebank
neighbourhood until the intersection of Rougemount Drive
and Toynevale Road is improved.
Ted Ciceura, representing the appl icant, stated that the
temporary access road was put in the plan because his
client does not own the land along Toynevale Road and the
temporary road will only be used if it is required. His
cl i ent wi 11 provi de the homeowners who abut the temporary
access road with a guarantee to repair any damage to their
property is the road is used. He noted that the
Development Plan only provides for one access to the
subject 1 ands from Toyneva 1 e Road. The dens i ty of the
proposal conforms to the Communi ty and Development Pl ans
and conforms to existing development. The staff have been
aware of this plan for some time and have shown no concern
about the length of the cul-de-sac. The zoning changes he
has asked for are very minor and will allow for a varied
street scape.
(III) DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 18T-9000S
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 3/90
GARTHWOOD HOMES LIMITED
BETWEEN ROUGEMOUNT DRIVE AND OAKWOOD DRIVE
1. An explanation of the application was given by Valerie
Rodrigues.
2. Angela Dye, 528 Oakwood Drive, stated that the subject
lands contain many mature trees. She asked why the subject
lands are being zoned for a park only to preserve the trees
and asked if the trees will be preserved and the park
properly fenced.
-.
3.
Tim Politis, representing the applicant, stated that there
is a tree preservation plan for the subject lands.
(IV) ADJOURNMENT OF STATUTORY PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING
The meeting adjourned at 8:30 a.m.
Dated May 25th 1992
'-'
,
22cnQ<
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
,..., If- Y C) It..