HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/09/1992
STATUTORY PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING MINUTES
......
A Statutory Public Information Meeting was held by the Pickering Town
Council on Monday, November 9, 1992 at 7:30 p.m.
PRESENT:
Mayor Wayne Arthurs
COUNCILLORS:
M. Brenner
E. Higdon
R. Johnson
E. Pistritto
K. Van Kempen
D. Wellman
ALSO PRESENT:
........
B. Taylor
N. C. Marshall
N. Carroll
T. Me1yrnuk
C. Rose
L. Taylor
D. Kearns
Town Clerk
Town Manager
Director of Planning
Deputy Director of Planning
Manager, Policy Division
Manager, Current Operations Division
Administrative-Assistant
(1) ZONING BY-IAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 12/92
GARTHWOOD HOMES LIMITED
LOTS 1-9 AND BLOCKS 38-40, PLAN 40M-1700
AND PART OF LOT 33. CONCESSION 1
1.
An explanation of the
Information Report No.
Rodrigues, Senior Planner.
application, as
19/92, was given
outlined in
by Valerie
2.
Tim Politis, Engineer for the Developer was present for
questioning.
3.
There were no comments in favour of or opposed to the
rezoning by-law amendment application.
........
(II) ZONING BY - IAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 7/92
J. AND G. KRZYNOWEK
LOTS 121 AND 122. PLAN 283
1. An explanation of the application, as outlined in
Information Report No. 20/92, was given by Heather Gardner,
Planning Technician 1 (Information).
2. John Krzynowek was present to answer any questions.
~
- 2 -
3.
Harold Webster, 510 Pine Ridge Road spoke in opposition of
this application and stated that he has a petition signed
by the residents who are also in opposition. He stated
that back in the 60' s he was active in supporting the
Zoning to a R- 3 Zone and does not wish to see this zoning
changed to R-4.
.,.
4.
Dr. Weber, 528 Pine Ridge Road spoke in opposition to the
zoning being changed from R-3 to R-4. He stated that this
unique area would be destroyed and the property values
would diminish with the approval of this application.
5.
Elizabeth Weber, 528 Pine Ridge Road stated her agreement
with the comments of the previous delegations.
6.
Bert Wiebicke, 524 Pine Ridge Road spoke in opposition of
this application. He stated that the zoning laws are in
place to protect the people who live there and does not
wish the zoning to be changed.
7.
Alexis Holmes, 506 Rougemount Drive stated her opposition
to this application.
8.
Robert Holmes, 506 Rougemount Drive also stated his
opposition to this application.
.'-"
9.
Carol Newman, 544 Rougemount Drive stated her opposition to
this application, commenting that this is an
environmentally significant area.
10. Bernice Ufnal, 540 Pine Ridge Road stated that when she had
an application before Planning many years ago, she was told
that this is a unique and distinctive area.
11. Steven Cutts, 542 Pine Ridge Road stated that he has a
petition with 36 signatures of residents in the area
stating their opposition to this application.
12. Raymond Worsley, 547 Pine Ridge Road spoke in opposition of
this application stating the area is very unique with large
lots and a rural atmosphere.
13. Jeannie Cutts, 542 Pine Ridge Road stated her opposition to
this application.
14.
James Sharman, 534 Pine Ridge Road stated his opposition to
any increased impact on the area.
~
15. William Kennedy, 516 Pineridge Road stated that he is in
agreement with the previous delegations speaking in
opposition to this application.
16. Ann Bridge, representing the Rosebank Ratepayers
Association stated her agreement with the comments of the
previous delegations. She stated that this is a distinct
rural area and any application should not be considered
unless to enhance the area. She is in strong opposition to
this application.
'-'
- 3 -
17.
Mr. Krzynowek responded to the concerns of the
delegations. He stated that the lots in questions are not
being reduced from 100' but from 60' to 50' and that the
uniqueness will remain. He also stated that in his opinion
the value of the properties would not diminish.
.....
18. Heather Gardner, Planning Technician I further explained
that the back of the properties in question are a greenbelt
area.
(III)
OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION 92-003/P
ZONING BY-IAW' AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 1/92
MET-STAR HOLDINGS LIMITED
PART OF WTS 23 AND 24. CONCESSION 1
1.
An explanation of the application was given by Brendan
Avery.
2.
Paul Noonan, 1769 Storrington Street stated that. Met-Star
Holdings Limited are already working outside the law and
questioned whether charges had been laid.
--
(VI) ADJOURNMENT OF STATUTORY PUBLIC MEETING
The meeting adjourned at the hour of 8:05 p.m.
Dated
~7
/</
~L
"'----...
"-
.,