HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/19/2006
C¿ú¡ t1~
Minutes I Meeting Summary
Statutory Public Information Meeting
Council Chambers
Thursday, January 19, 2006
7:00 pm.
Attendees:
Councillor Ashe - Chair
Councillor Dickerson
Councillor Johnson
Councillor McLean
Lynda Taylor, Manager, Development Review
Geoff Romanowski, Planner II
Rick Cefaratti, Planner II
Joyce Yeh, Planner I
Alison Haines, Recording Secretary
PICKERING OFFIC AL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
- OPA 05-003/P
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 10105
786 INDOPAK INC.
875 KINGSTON ROAD
PART OF LOT 27, B.F.C. RANGE 3
(40R-8710, PART 1,2 & PART OF PART 3)
CITY OF PICKERING
1. Planner Comments
Geoff Romanowski, Planner II provided an overview of the application and property.
He stated that to date comments have been received by Veridian, the Region of
Durham, CN Rail, St. Paul's on the Hill, Toronto Region Conservation Authority,
Ministry of Transportation and a number of residents and property owners in the area.
2. Applicant Comments
The applicant explained that the building would include two levels of parking on the
south side of the building, and a retail sector including an indoor mall. Residential
space would begin on the fourth floor. He explained that to date a traffic study and
draft analysis for acoustic study have been completed and both are favourable.
3. Comments from Members of the Public
Sylvia Spencer
771 She ard A venue
Page 1
CORPO228-2/02
Sylvia Spencer has an objection to the height of the structure, but would not oppose a
3 storey commercial building, and believes that if a shadow study was to be
conducted, St. Paul's on the Hill daycare would likely fall in it. She is concerned with
steam from the Nuclear Power Plant, the potential for a gas explosion from the station
across the street, and questioned if the warnings from the Nuclear Power Plant would
be blocked from residents that live beyond this building. She further expressed
concern with the implications of a solar power building to City the budget, the amount
of parking for the retail establishments and the number of handicap spots. Sylvia is
concerned with the safety of children who reside in the building as trucks seem to use
this area of Highway 401 to gear down and further, the migratory path for birds may
be affected by the building.
Catherine Bare
1713 Sprucehill Road
Catherine Bare is concerned with how schools in the area will be able to
accommodate the new children in the community due to the fact a number of schools
were closed as the neighbourhood was considered to be aging.
Robert Jones
878 Sheppard Ave.
Robert Jones believes the building is too dense and is concerned with what will
happen to the wildlife that depend on the stream on the subject property. He further
expressed concern about the increase in traffic and the safety of children in the area,
the building's aesthetic appeal and how the building would affect the new dealership.
Mr. Jones advised that he would be in favour of a smaller building.
John Dawson, Solicitor for Owner of the Volvo Dealership
920 Kingston Road
Mr. Dawson advised that his client was trying to assess what the impact would be and
there appeared no justification to increase the density permitted on this lot. His client
is concerned about the increase in noise and that it did not appear to adhere to
guidelines and upgraded windows would be required. As the live-work style is not
customary in the area, he questioned what would happen if the plan failed.
Furthermore, the only access to the residential areas is through the commercial
section of the building.
Diane Marmena
1724 Sprucehill Road
Diane Marmena stated that the proposed plan was too large for what we require and
would not oppose a smaller commercial facility. She noted that herself along with
other neighbours were very concerned with loitering.
4. Applicants Response
The Applicant appreciates the residents concerns and stated the following. The
Page 2
CORPO228-2/02
developer intends to have 50% of power consumption through solar resources.
The concept of the live-work building is to reduce the need to go elsewhere, thus
minimizing traffic impacts.
5. Planner Response
Geoff Romanowski advised that the proposed plan has been circulated to the Toronto
Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and a site visit had been conducted to view
the undeveloped area. Geotechnical and additional information has been requested in
order for TRCA to give their approval. Additionally, staff will be generating a report for
Council and the community will have an opportunity to make submissions at that time.
6. Comments from the Chair
Councillor Ashe advised the public that Councillors would be happy to facilitate the
process for another meeting to discuss the issue with residents before proceeding to
more formal meetings of Committee and Council.
2.
ZONING BY-LAW. AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 22/05
1430658 ONTARIOJNC.
1050 BROCK RO.A.D, UNIT 25
SOUTH PART OF.DC>TI9, CONCESSION 1
CITY OF PICKERING
1. Planner Comments
Joyce Yeh, Planner I outlined the application. She advised that to date the City had
received a petition signed by 12 business owners within the subject property and 10
business owners south of the subject property, expressing concerns with safety,
crime and property values.
2. Applicant Comments
The applicant provided a history of massage and the need for such services for
mental health. Advised that under the name Pickering Spa the premises is being
used as a massage or spa parlour, they do not conduct business outside hours and
they serve men, women and children.
3. Comments from Members of the Public
No comments from members of the public.
3.
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 28/05
RENATA TRENT
DURHAM CONDO PLAN 105, LEVEL I, UNIT4
(905 DILLINGHAMl{C>,¡\P)
CITY OF PICKERING.
Page 3
CORPO228-2/02
1. Planner Comments
Geoff Romanowski, Planner II provided an overview of the application, current zoning
for the property and staff comments to date.
2. Applicant Comments
No comments
3. Comments from Members of the Public
No comments from members of the public.
4.
ZONIN.GBY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 25/05
974735 ONTARIO INC.
388 SALE. ROAD
P LOT3, CONCESSION 6
(NO 40R-23226 PARTS 2&3)
CIT¥~OFPICKERING
1. Planner Comments
Rick Cefaratti, Planner II provided an overview of the application and comments
provided so far. Concerns from residents have been received with respect to access
from Highway 7 and the potential increase in traffic, along with the impact on the
quality of the well water in the area. Staff advised that the Region of Durham's
Planning Department and other agencies require more information on the proposal.
2. Applicant Comments
Valerie Cranmer, of Cranmer Associates, Applicant Representative
Ms. Cranmer stated that the applicant is working closely with TRCA and the City of
Pickering to provide required information. Additionally, a hydro-geological study had
been prepared determining that there should not be any implications to health and an
independent study was being completed and will be provided to the City along with
area residents.
3. Comments from Members of the Public
No comments from members of the public.
5.
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 26/05
1044910 ONTARIO INC.
1890 GLENVIEW ROAD
PART OF LOT 41, PLAN 509
CITYOFPICKERING
1. Planner Comments
Page 4
cORPO228-2/02
Rick Cefaratti , Planner II provided an overview of the application and advised that
two letters from adjacent property owners had been received concerning traffic and
parking accommodation abilities of the property.
2. Applicant Comments
Dr. David Fletcher stated that he waned to renovate the dwelling to double the current
size. He further stated the he did not believe parking would be an issue as there will
be only a small number of staff and limited patients. The Applicant further believes the
proposal is a logical transition between high density on the south side of Kingston
Road and low density on the north side. Dr. Fletcher further advised that he would be
planning the ingress and egress on Glengrove Road.
3. Comments from Members of the Public
Richard Spows
1890 Glengrove Road
Richard Spows stated that this building is part of the original downtown core. He is
interested in how the structure will be increased and what exactly the Applicant
means by mixed use. He is concerned about the impact on the school and other
traffic concerns.
Bill Mankinen
1899 Glengrove Road
Bill Mankinen is hoping that as the subject property is adjacent to a residential area
the application will be considered with the least amount of change as to not disturb
the neighbourhood. He would like to know the proposed structure usage and
maximum size, including the parking layout. He is concerned with the proposed
egress for the structure as its location could potentially clog the area.
Doreen Adair
1892 Glengrove Road
Doreen Adair is concerned with the increase in traffic and students in the area. She
also wants specifics on the size of the new building and how many doctors will
practice at the facility.
Kathy Smith
1896 Glenview Road
Kathy Smith is concerned with seniors and students in the area who utilize the street
and the bus stop, as there are no sidewalks in the area.
4. Applicant Response
The applicant advised that the conceptual study has been completed for the subject
property and it was determined that the area could accommodate a two storey
structure approximatel 500 sq feet. The Applicant revised his plans and is proposing
Page 5
cORPO228-2/02
an ilL" shaped building in order to retain topical geography. The Applicant also
advised his intent to use the property as a clinical facility and be the sole doctor.
5. Planner Response
The Planner responded that they have not received any comments from Municipal
Property & Engineering. He emphasized that the plan is conceptual and the applicant
would be required to proceed to the site plan process before being approved and at
that time the appropriate entrance would be determined. The Planner advised that the
City has no current plans to urbanize the area.
6. Applicant Response
The Applicant emphasized that they have not submitted a site plan and would be
agreeable to moving the driveway.
6.
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 27/05
SILVER LANE.EST A TES INC.
SOUTH PARTOF LOT 32, CONCESSION 1
OW BLOCKS 39 AND 46, PLAN 40M-2119 AND 40R-11901, PART 4)
EAST OF ALTONA ROAD AND SOUTH OF STROUDS LANE
CITY 0 FPI C KERIN G
1. Planner Comments
Rick Cefaratti, Planner II provided an overview of the application.
2. Applicant Comments
Todd Coles, Humphries Planning Group appeared on behalf of the applicant.
3. Comments from Members of the Public
Jeff Bowers
2002 Tillson Court
Jeff Bowers stated he is unclear of what is being proposed. He requested clarification
on the open water containment area. He stated that he would like to ensure that the
correct groups within the TRCA is made aware of the proposal and there is a water
table concern. Mr. Bowers is concerned with storm water management in the area.
He also suggested a stop sign at Calvington Drive and Strouds Lane.
Valerie Chuvie
Branby Court
Valerie Chuvie is concerned of future development in the conservation area near the
subject property. Additionally she commented that Altona road is extremely busy and
had witnessed several near accidents.
Ma 'orie Tonner
Page 6
cORPO228-2/02
1991 Calvington Drive
Marjorie Tonner commented that Strouds Lane had become very busy and is
concerned that construction vehicles would be using Calvington drive.
4. Planner Response
The Planner clarified that the original draft plan for the subdivision had previously
been approved by Council and this application is only to amend the zoning in order to
permit the building of the approved townhomes. The property is partially in the
original subdivision area and therefore required the change in zoning in order to allow
the dwelling to be constructed.
5. Chair Response
Clarified that no new dwelling, not previously approved, is being considered.
Addressed concerns of Altona Road stating this street had been recognized by the
Region of Durham as a priority area for revamping (sidewalks etc.) Also, a traffic
study had been completed on Strouds Lane with no concerns found but perhaps now
with the new development further studies would be required. The Chair further
advised that the City's Municipal Property and Engineering Division should be
contacted to investigate the necessity of a stop sign at Calvington Drive and Strouds
Lane.
Lynda Taylor, Manager, Development Review clarified that this proposal is only to
modify the zoning subdivision plans that have already been approved.
6. Applicant Response
The Applicant advised that they will work with the TRCA and tree preservation will be
complied with. Additionally Block 39 could not be alternated from its approved
development because of the size of the lot.
ZONING. BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 30/05
AL-KARIM & SHOLINARHEMTULLA
8 FAIRPORT ROAD
C>FLOTIO& 11, PLAN 820
T240R-9225 & PART 2, 40R-11504)
CI OF PICKERING
1. Planner Comments
Joyce Yeh, Planner I provided an overview of the application.
2. Applicant Comments
The A licant believes there is a profound need for
Page 7
cORPO228-2/02
neighbourhood.
3. Comments from Members of the Public
Christine Gibson
1772 Fairport Road
The resident raised concerns with the noise levels but mentioned she has recently
spoken to the applicant and has been ensured that the daycare will be moved away
from her yard and trees etc. planted to eliminate noise. She would like to see
restrictions placed on the times and days the daycare may operate.
Victor Lesiks
1773 Fairport Road
The resident has no objections to the proposed use, however does have concerns
with traffic on Fairport Road and questioned if stoplights could be placed at the corner
of Welrus Street and Fairport Road.
4. Applicant Response
There were no additional comments from applicant
5. Planner Response
The Planner stated that the Planning & Development Department would consider
traffic and noise concerns.
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 29/05
2075729 ONTARIO INC.
1962 GUILD ROAD AND 1640.KINGSTON ROAD
(PART OF LOTS 1 AND 2, PLAN 316 AND P ART OF LOT 20, CONCESSION 6)
. CITY OF PICKERING
1. Planner Comments
Rick Cefaratti, Planner I provided an overview of the application.
2. Applicant Comments
Tony Biglieri, Planning consultant, Applicant Representative
Stated his client is requesting a temporary zoning for an antique market and they
intend to clean up the subject property.
3. Comments from Members of the Public
Ian Rankin, Charter Home Management (owners of Pickering Flea Market)
Ian Rankin believes this application has caused great concern with the definition of
antique market, and temporary market and believes the by-law, as it stands, leaves
the otential for this establishment to become a flea market. He stated that
Page 8
cORPO228-2/02
"temporary retail" needs to be clarified.
Rick Gallant
1961 Guild Road
Rick Gallant is concerned with the appearance of the property and wants the
driveway to be on Kingston Road.
Kathy Quinn
1976 Guild Road
Kathy Quinn is concerned with the lack of a fence around the property and the issue
of people walking directly into their backyard.
4. Applicant Response
The Applicant Representative advised that their intent is for an antique market; they
will look at the entrance off Kingston Road, work with staff with respect to fencing and
they are already cleaning up the property. With respect to parking, the
representative's understanding was that a ten-year lease was purchased and there
are 8 years remaining on the lease.
The meeting adjourned at 9: 15 pm.
Page 9
cORPO228-2/02