HomeMy WebLinkAboutJanuary 17, 2005 Council Meeting
Agenda
Monday, January 17, 2005
7:30 PM
INVOCATION
Mayor Ryan will call the meeting to order and lead Council in
the saying of the Invocation.
(11)
ADOPTION OF MINUTES
Regular Meeting of December 20, 2004
1-17
(III)
DELEGATIONS
Mark Holland, MP, Ajax-Pickering, will address Council
concerning Federal/Municipal relations.
Jeff MacDonald, representing Amaco Equipment, will address
Council concerning the Hydroscopic Excavator.
(IV)
1.
RESOLUTIONS
To adopt the Executive Committee Report, Appendix I, dated
January 10, 2005.
To consider Report PD 02-05 regarding Participation in Provincial
GeoSmart Funding Program.
To consider Report CAO 03-05 regarding Region of Durham
Business Case Analysis for the Potential Transfer of Lower-Tier
Municipal Transit Services.
4. To reconsider Report OES 39-04 regarding the Supply and
Delivery of One Telescopic Boom Excavator.
PAGE
18-22
23-32
33-53
54-61
(V) BY-LAWS
By-law Number 6433/05
Being a by-law dedicate Block 114, Plan 40M-1473, Pickering, as public
highway.
62
-1-
Council Meeting
Agenda
Monday, January 17, 2005
7:30 PM
By-law Number 6434/05
Being a by-law to assume the roads within Plans 40M-1472, 40M-1473
and 40M-1571 for public use as public highways and to assume the
services within Plans 40M-1347, 40M-1472, 40M-1473 and 40M-1571
under the jurisdiction of the City of Pickering.
By-law Number 6435~05
Being a by-law to amend By-law 1416/82 providing for the regulation and
licensing of places of amusement.
By-law Number 6436~05
Being a by-law to authorize the release and removal of the Subdivision
Agreement respecting Plan 40M-1347, Pickering, from title.
By-law Number 6437~05
Being a by-law to authorize the release and removal of the Subdivision
Agreement, respecting Plan 40M-1472, Pickering, from title.
By-law Number 6438~05
Being a by-law to authorize the release and removal from title of the
Agreements relating to the development of Plan 40M-1473, Pickering and
those parts of Lot 30, Concession 1, Pickering, being Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
and 6, Plan 40R-11443.
By-law Number 6439~05
Being a by-law to authorize the release and removal of the Subdivision
Agreement respecting Plan 40M-1571, Pickering, from title.
By-law Number 6440~05
Being a by-law to dedicate Block 139, Plan 40M-1418, Pickering as public
highway.
63
64
65
68
67
68
69
-2-
Council Meeting
Agenda
Monday, January 17, 2005
7:30 PM
By-law Number 6441/05
Being a by-law to dedicate Block 88, Plan 40M-1419, Pickering, as public
highway.
By-law Number 6442/05
Being a by-law to assume the roads as public highways and the services
within Plan 40M-1254 (save and except Blocks 20 to 27, inclusive), Plan
40M-1418 (save and except Blocks 137, 138 and 141) and Plan 40M-
1419 (save and except Blocks 86 and 89), under the jurisdiction of the City
of Pickering.
By-law Number 6443/05
Being a by-law to amend By-law 1416/82 providing for the regulation and
licensing of places of amusement.
By-law Number 6444/05
Being a by-law to authorize the release and removal of the Agreements
relating to Plan 40M-1254, Pickering, from title.
By-law Number 6445/05
Being a by-law to authorize the release and removal of the Subdivision
Agreement from the Lots an Blocks within Plan 40M-1418, Pickering, from
title (save and except from Blocks 137 and 138).
By-law Number 6446/05
Being a by-law to authorize the release and removal of the Subdivision
Agreement from the Lots and Blocks within Plan 40M-1419, Pickering,
from title (save and except from Block 86).
By-law Number 6447/05
Being a by-law to dedicate those parts of Lots 15 and 17, Registrar's
Compiled Plan No. 1051, Pickering, designated as Parts 1 and 2, Plan
40R-10267 as public highway (Heathside Crescent).
7O
71
72
73
74
75
76-78
-3-
Council Meeting
Agenda
Monday, January 17, 2005
7:30 PM
By-law Number 6448/05
Being a by-law to amend By-law 2359/87 providing for the regulating of
parking, standing and stopping on highways or parts of highways under
the jurisdiction of the City of Pickering and on private and municipal
property.
By-law Number 6449/05
Being a by-law to amend By-law 2359/87 providing for the regulating of
parking, standing and stopping on highways or parts of highways under
the jurisdiction of the City of Pickering and on pdvate and municipal
property.
By-law Number 6450/05
Being a by-law to amend By-law 2632/88 to provide for erecting of Stop
signs at certain intersections within the City of Pickering.
By-law Number 6451/05
Being a by-law for the collection of taxes and to establish the installment
due dates for the Interim Levy 2005.
By-law Number 6452/05
Being a by-law respecting Council salaries, benefits, allowances and
communications.
79
80
81
82-84
85-89
(VI)
1.
NOTICE OF MOTION
Moved by Councillor Dickerson
Seconded by Councillor Johnson
WHEREAS the City of Pickering depends on the contribution of
many volunteers to ensure quality of life for all its citizens; and
WHEREAS the Government of Canada recognizes veterans as all
former members of the Canadian Forces who meet the military's
professional occupation requirements and have been released with
an honourable discharge. This definition includes reserves, those
90-91
-4-
Council Meeting
Agenda
Monday, January 17, 2005
7:30 PM
who have served on domestic duty and those who have served in
"Special Duty Area" (e.g. peacekeeping assignments; and
WHEREAS the City of Pickering salutes its veterans, both living
and deceased, each November 11th in a Remembrance Day
Ceremony; and
WHEREAS the City of Pickering ought to have a policy of naming
streets in memory and in honour of war veterans; and
WHEREAS those honoured through the street naming process
should be those men and women who voluntarily enlisted with
Canada's military forces and served overseas in active duty during
the Boer War, World War 1, World War 2, the Korean conflict and
the Crimean War and those who lost their lives in any
peacekeeping action initiated by the United Nations or NATO in
which Canadian forces played an active military role (e.g.
Afghanistan); and
WHEREAS the war veterans to be recognized in this program
would be those who were residents of Pickering at the time of their
enlistment;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the policy of naming
streets in memory and in honour of was veterans be instituted as a
public acknowledgement of Pickering's truly "Ultimate Volunteers"
based on the following criteria wherever possible:
a) Killed or missing in action be honoured first,
b) Veterans who have passed away;
c) Veterans still living be so honoured next.
FURTHER THAT all streets named in honour of veterans be
identified with street signs displaying a poppy; and
FURTHER THAT Royal Canadian Legion Branches 606 Pickering
and 483 Claremont be invited to assist with research of veteran's
names.
-5-
Council Meeting
Agenda
Monday, January 17, 2005
7:30 PM
Moved by Councillor McLean
Seconded by Councillor Dickerson
WHEREAS various businesses have been using search lights as an
advertising method to attract customers; and
WHEREAS search lights tend to cause a nuisance to residents that
live close to such search lights; and
WHEREAS other forms of advertising through illuminated pylon signs,
billboard signs and wall signs are strictly regulated through the City's
Sign By-law;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the City of
Pickering hereby directs staff to prepare a by-law that will restrict the
use of search lights in a manner that they will not cause a nuisance to
residents or local businesses.
92
Moved by Councillor Ashe
Seconded by Councillor McLean
WHEREAS many volunteer Fire Departments in Ontado are
strengthened by the service of "Double Hatters" fire fighters who
work as professional, full-time fighters and also serve as volunteer
fire fighters on their free time and in their home communities; and
WHEREAS the Ontario Professional Fire Fighters Association has
declared their intent to "phase out" these "Double Hatters"
firefighters; and
WHEREAS "Double Hatters" are being threatened by the union
leadership and forced to resign as volunteer fire fighters or face
losing their full-time jobs and this is weakening volunteer fire
departments in Ontario; and
WHEREAS a Private Members Bill (Bill 52), being the Volunteer
Fire Fighters Employment Protection Act, has been introduced that
would uphold the right to volunteer and solve this problem
concerning public safety in Ontario; and
WHEREAS over 100 Ontario municipalities have passed
resolutions in support of "Double Hatters", and
93-94
-6-
Council Meeting
Agenda
Monday, January 17, 2005
7:30 PM
WHEREAS Association of Municipalities of Ontario President
Roger Anderson stated in his inaugural address AMO's
commitment to "fight the rights of double hatters fire fighters to
exercise free choice in their free time";
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Pickering
urge the Government of Ontario to express public support of Bill 52
and a willingness to pass it into law or introduce similar legislation
that protects the rights of fire fighters to volunteer in their home
communities on their free time, and
FURTHER THAT a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the
following:
Premier of Ontario
· Minister of Public Safety
Wayne Arthurs MPP
· Leader of the Official Opposition
· Leader of the NDP Party
· AMO
· Durham Municipalities
(VII) OTHER BUSINESS
(VIII) CONFIRMATION BY-LAW
(IX) ADJOURNMENT
-7-
HC-KEiedNG
Council Meeting Minutes
Monday, December 20, 2004
7:30 PM
PRESENT:
Mayor David Ryan
COUNCILLORS:
K. Ashe
M. Brenner
D. Dickerson
R. Johnson
B. McLean
D. Pickles
ALSO PRESENT:
E. Buntsma
N. Carroll
G. Paterson
B. Taylor
R. Holborn
D. Watrous
- Chief Administrative Officer (Acting) and
Director, Operations & Emergency Services
- Director, Planning & Development
- Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
- City Clerk
- Division Head, Municipal Property & Engineering
- Committee Coordinator
ABSENT:
T. J. Quinn
- Chief Administrative Officer (Medical Leave)
(i)
INVOCATION
Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order and led Council in the saying of the
Invocation.
(11)
1.
PRESENTATION
Bill Sorenberger, representing the Men's Progress Club, presented a plaque to
honour the donation of a defibrillator unit at the Don Beer Arena.
02
PICKEI4NG
Council Meeting Minutes
Monday, December 20, 2004
7:30 PM
(111)
1.
DELEGATIONS
Yvonne Sweetman, Greenwood, addressed Council concerning growth in the
Hamlet of Greenwood. She thanked Council for including Greenwood in the
Draft Greenbelt Plan and for their support at the Region.
The following delegations addressed Council concerning the Notice of Motion
respecting the proposed airport:
a)
Sam Orrico, P. O. Box 24, Markham, spoke in support of the motion and
stated that it provides an opportunity to study the appropriateness of an
airport.
b)
Giogio Siragusa, 537 Rodd Ave., stated his opposition to the airport as it
erodes the social fabric of the City. He feels that the Federal Government is
creating an airport to cover up a miStake.
c)
Stephen N. Frederick, representing V.O.C.A.L., stated his support of the
motion and the need for a peer review of the GTAA proposal.
d)
Michael Robertson, 865 Conc. 7, lives on airport lands and supports the
motion. This land is the last Class A farmland and needs to be preserved.
He advised of the pollution concern and further stated that this is the last of
the recreational airspace.
(IV) RESOLUTIONS
Resolution #167/04
Moved by Councillor Brenner
Seconded by Councillor Pickles
That the Report of the Executive Committee EC 2004-20, dated December 13, 2004, be
adopted.
CARRIED
-2-
Council Meeting Minutes
Monday, December 20, 2004
7:30 PM
Resolution #168104
Moved by Councillor Brenner
Seconded by Councillor Dickerson
That the Report of the Audit Committee AC 2004-01, Appendix I, dated December 6,
2004, be adopted.
CARRIED
Resolution #169~04
Moved by Councillor McLean
Seconded by Councillor Brenner
1.
That Corporate Services Report CS 59-04 regarding the proposed 2005 Animal
Services Budget, be received; and
2. That the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby approves the
2005 Animal Services Budget as recommended by the Pickering-Ajax-Whitby Joint
Animal Services Committee at its meeting of November 30, 2004.
REFERRED TO THE
EXECUTIVE MEETING OF
JANUARY 24, 2005
Council considered the following motion in conjunction with the above resolution:
Resolution #169104{a)
Moved by Councillor McLean
Seconded by Councillor Brenner
That the above resolution be referred to the Executive Meeting of January 24, 2005.
CARRIED
-3-
Council Meeting Minutes
Monday, December 20, 2004
7:30 PM
Resolution #170104
Moved by Councillor Brenner
Seconded by Councillor McLean
1. That Report OES 39-04 regarding the supply and delivery of a Telescopic Boom
Excavator be received; and
That Quotation No. Q-41-2004 submitted by Strongco Equipment for the supply and
delivery of a Badger Model 460 Telescopic Boom Excavator with the specified
attachments in the amount of $294,662 (GST and PST extra) be accepted; and
3. That the total purchase cost of $338,861.30 and a net purchase cost of $318,234.96
including specified attachments for the equipment be approved; and
That the total revised funding of $318,234.96 with $255,000 of five year debt as
provided for in the 2004 Capital Budget and an additional $63,000 in a five year
internal loan and $235 from current funds be approved; and
5. That Council authorize the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer to finance the
purchase through the issuance of debt; and
a) That debt financing through the Region of Durham in the amount of $255,000
for a period not exceeding 5 years, at a rate to be determined be approved; and
b)
That financing and repayment charges in the amount of $58,900 be included in
the annual current budget for the City of Pickering commencing in 2005 and
continuing thereafter until the loan is repaid; and
c)
That the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer has certified that this loan
and the repayment there of falls within the City's debt and financial obligations
approved annual repayment limit for debt and other financial obligations for
2004 as established by the Province for Municipalities in Ontario; and
d)
That the Treasurer be authorized to take any actions necessary in order to
effect the foregoing; and
6. That staff at The City of Pickering be given the authority to give effect hereto.
REFERRED TO THE
2005 BUDGET
-4-
Council Meeting Minutes
Monday, December 20, 2004
7:30 PM
Council considered the following motion in conjunction with the above resolution:
Resolution #170104(a)
Moved by Councillor Dickerson
Seconded by Councillor Ashe
That the above resolution be referred to the 2005 Budget.
CARRIED
Recorded Vote
Yes: Councillors Brenner, Dickerson, Johnson and. McLean
No: Councillors Ashe, Pickles and Mayor Ryan
Resolution #171/04
Moved by Councillor McLean
Seconded by Councillor Brenner
1. That Report to Council OES 42-04 regarding the Canada-Ontario Municipal Rural
Infrastructure Fund (COMRIF) be received; and
2. That the Corporation of the City of Pickering is prepared to participate in COMRIF
through the submission of an application for Intake One by the application deadline
of January 10, 2005; and
3. That the City of Pickering's participation in COMRIF shall consist of an undertaking
of a bridge deck replacement program, at a total estimated cost of $1,730,300 and a
net estimated cost of $576,767, at the following locations as its highest priority:
Greenwood Bridge
Bulmer Bridge
· Palmer Bridge
· Michell Bridge
· Reesor Creek Bridge
That staff be given authority to prepare and submit the necessary documentation for
the on-line application including a resolution by Council; and
5. That the COMRIF project be identified as a Capital priority in the 2005 Capital
Budget, subject to receiving approval of funding by COMRIF; and
5
Council Meeting Minutes
Monday, December 20, 2004
7:30 PM
6. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be given authority to give effect
thereto.
CARRIED
Recorded Vote:
Yes: Councillors Ashe, Brenner,
Ryan
Dickerson, Johnson, McLean,
Pickles and Mayor
Resolution #172104
Moved by Councillor Pickles
Seconded by Councillor Johnson
WHEREAS by Resolution #212/98 the Federal Minister of Transport was advised that
Council and residents of Pickering do not support the development of an airport; and
WHEREAS in April 2001, the Federal Transport Minister announced that the Greater
Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA) had been asked to determine the need for a future
regional reliever airport on the Pickering lands; and
WHEREAS a report prepared for the GTAA and released in September 2002 entitled
"Pickering Lands Airport Planning Initiative - Financial Assessment Analysis" concluded
that an airport based on a preliminary business model was feasible; and
WHEREAS a Pickering Airport Draft Plan Report was released by the GTAA in
November 2004, outlining a conceptual airport site layout, timeframes, and justification
for an airport in Pickering, and that the GTAA announced that the Financial Assessment
Analysis will be updated, and
WHEREAS these reports are important early components of the rationale for the
potential establishment of an airport in Pickering and were important sources in the
development of an environmental assessment for the proposed airport, therefore, the
City of Pickering should review the Analysis and provide a response to the GTAA; and
WHEREAS these reports are very technical documents and provide a very specialized
field of analysis that staff of the City of Pickering do not have the expertise to review and
comment on in a meaningful way; and
WHEREAS the City has received sufficient funding from proponents in special planning
studies and reviews impacting the City of Pickering, including but not limited to, Special
Study Areas, Ontario Power Generation's Return to Service of Pickering 'A', Ontario
-6-
Council Meeting Minutes
Monday, December 20, 2004
7:30 PM
07
Power Generation's Waste Facility Expansion Study, and the Nuclear Waste
Management Organization Review, and the Growth Management Study;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT it is essential to for the City of Pickering
to obtain an independent review of the Pickering Airport Draft Plan Report and updated
Financial Assessment Analysis at this time, prior to the initiation of an environmental
assessment, to protect the interests of the residents and The Corporation of the City of
Pickering, and
THAT City of Picketing acquire the consulting services to undertake a peer review of the
Pickering Airport Draft Plan Report and updated Financial Assessment Analysis, and
THAT City of Pickering staff prepare an appropriate terms of reference, procedure (e.g.
request for proposals), and proposed budget for a peer review of the Pickering Airport
Draft Plan Report and updated Financial Assessment Analysis for Council's
consideration at a scheduled Council meeting to be no later than February 7, 2005, and
THAT the City of Pickering in the interim request that the Federal Transport Minister and
the CEO of the Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA) provide sufficient funding in
order for the City of Pickering to acquire the appropriate qualified expert services to
review the Pickering Airport Draft Plan and updated Financial Assessment Analysis and
provide meaningful comments and recommendations to the Council and City of
Pickering; and
THAT the Mayor, on behalf of the City of Pickering, formally make this request in writing
to the Transport Minister and the President and CEO of the GTAA, with a copy to the
Members of Parliament for Ajax-Pickering and Pickering-East Scarborough, and
Members of Provincial Parliament for Ajax-Pickering and Uxbridge.
CARRIED
Recorded Vote:
Yes: Councillors Ashe, Brenner, Dickerson, Johnson, McLean and Pickles
No: Mayor Ryan
7
05
Council Meeting Minutes
Monday, December 20, 2004
7:30 PM
Resolution #173/04
Moved by Councillor Brenner
Seconded by Councillor Ashe
WHEREAS the residents on Marinet Crescent and Eyer Drive, backing onto Bayly
Street, between Whites Road and West Shore Boulevard, have expressed concern
respecting the impact of noise from Highway #401, the CNR line, and VIA train activity,
and Bayly Street, on their living environment; and
WHEREAS the homes in this area of the City were constructed in the 1960's and
1970's, prior to the construction of Bayly Street between Whites Road and West Shore
Boulevard; and
WHEREAS residents have continually expressed concern over the increase in noise
levels that have occurred over the years as each of the noise sources was established
and/or increased in intensity; and
WHEREAS at a meeting held on December 6, 2004, the Region of Durham and the
Ministry of Transportation staff advised that it is reasonable to consider this area of the
City for retrofit measures to address noise concerns through attenuation fencing, based
on the principle of cost sharing by all parties; and
WHEREAS the City of Pickering acknowledges the significance of area resident
concerns respecting noise levels in this area of the City and the impact of noise on the
residential living environment; and
WHEREAS Bayly Street is under the jurisdiction of the Region of Durham which has
expertise and experience in addressing retrofit solutions to noise attenuation matters;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Pickering requests the
Regional Municipality of Durham to coordinate a review of potential noise attenuation
measures and implementation strategies to address resident concerns in the area of
Bayly Street between West Shore Boulevard and Whites Road, and that such
investigation include staff from the Ministry of Transportation, the CNR, GO Transit,
Region of Durham, City of Pickering and area residents; and
FURTHER THAT the Region of Durham advise the City of Pickering of the work
program that it intends to undertake to address this matter; and
FURTHER THAT a copy of this resolution be forwarded to:
-8-
Council Meeting Minutes
Monday, December 20, 2004
7:30 PM
09
Minister of Transportation, the Honourable Harinder $. Takhar
Development Review Coordinator, CN Railway Properties, Mr. G.
Woods
Managing Director & CEO, GO Transit; Mr. G. McNeal
Region of Durham Commissioner of Works, Mr. C. Curtis P.Eng., MBA
Regional Council
Mark Holland, MP, Ajax-Pickering
Hon. Dan McTeague, P.C., MP Pickering-Scarborough East
CARRIED
Resolution #174~04
Moved by Councillor Brenner
Seconded by Councillor McLean
That Pickering Council directs the Director, Planning & Development to consider, as
part of the zoning strategy for Central Pickering, the use of holding provisions in zoning
by-laws for lands where studies are required related to the protection of First Nations'
site features and resources.
CARRIED
{V) BY-LAWS
That Councillor Dickerson, seconded by Councillor Brenner, took leave to introduce by-
laws of the City of Picketing:
By-law Number 6413/04
Being a by-law to amend Restricted Area Zoning By-law 3037, to implement the Official
Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham, north Part of Lot 14, Concession 9,
City of Pickering. (A 03/04)
By-law Number 6414/04
Being a by-law to authorize the release and removal of the Subdivision Agreement and
related amending agreement respecting Plan 40M-1602, Pickering, from title.
9
Council Meeting Minutes
Monday, December 20, 2004
7:30 PM
By-law Number 6415/04
Being a by-law to authorize the release and removal of the Subdivision Agreement
respecting Plan 40M-1603, Pickering (save and except Lot 1 and Block 26), from title.
By-law Number 6416~04
Being a by-law to assume the roads as public highways and the services within Plan
'40M-1602 (save and except Blocks 12 and 13) and Plan 40M~1603 (save and except
Lot 1 and Blocks 26 and 27), under the jurisdiction of the City of Pickering.
By-law Number 6417~04
Being a by-law to amend By-iaw i4t6/t~2 providing for the regulation and licensing of
places of amusement.
By-law Number 6418~04
Being a by-law to provide for the establishment of a Reserve Fund to be known as the
Dedicated Gas Tax Reserve Fund.
By-law Number 6419~04
Being a by-law to authorize the release and removal of the Subdivision Agreement
respecting Plan 40M-1609, Pickering, from title.
By-law Number 6420~04
Being a by-law to amend By-law 2632/88 providing for the erection of stop signs.
By-law Number 6421/04
Being a by-law to authorize the release and removal of the Subdivision Agreement
respecting Plan 40M-1607, Pickering, from title.
By-law Number 6422~04
Being a by-law to amend By-law 1416/82 providing for the regulation and licensing of
places of amusement.
-10-
Council Meeting Minutes
Monday, December 20, 2004
7:30 PM
By-law Number 6423/04
Being a by-law to authorize the release and removal of the Subdivision Agreement
respecting Plan 40M-1616, Pickering, from title.
By-law Number 6424/04
Being a by-law to assume the roads as public highways and the services within Plan
40M-1607 (save and except Blocks 80, 87, 88, 89 and 90), Plan 40M-1609 (save and
except Blocks 25, 33, 34, 35, 36 and 37) and Plan 40M-1616, under the jurisdiction of
the City of Pickering.
By-law Number 6425~04
Being a by-law to authorize the release and removal of the Subdivision Agreement
relating to Blocks 1 to 6, Plan 40M-1599, Pickering, from title.
By-law Number 6426~04
Being a by-law to authorize the release and removal of the Subdivision Agreement
relating to Plan 40M-1590, Pickering and the Amending Subdivision Agreement relating
to Blocks 12 and 13, Plan 40M-1590, Picketing, together with those parts of Lots 170
and 171, Registrar's Compiled Plan 816, Pickering, being Parts 1, 4 and 5, Plan 40R-
12593, from title.
By-law Number 6427/04
Being a by-law to amend By-law 1416/82 providing for the regulation and licensing of
places of amusement.
By-law Number 6428/04
Being a by-law to assume the roads as public highways and the services within Plan
40M-1590, Plan 40M-1599 (save and except Blocks 10, 11 and 12) and Plan 40M-1600
(save and except Blocks 43, 44 and 45), under the jurisdiction of the City of Pickering.
By-law Number 6429/04
Being a by-law to dedicate those parts of Lot 171, Registrar's Compiled Plan 816,
Picketing, being Parts 2 and 3, Plan 40R-12593 as public highway.
-11 -
1£
PI(ZKEI NG
Council Meeting Minutes
Monday, December 20, 2004
7:30 PM
By-law Number 6430/04
Being a by-law to authorize the release and removal from title of the Subdivision
Agreement relating to Plan 40M-1600, Pickering and respective amending agreements.
By-law Number 6431/04
Being a by-law to authorize the temporary borrowing of moneys to meet the current and
capital expenditures of the City of Pickering for the year 2005.
CARRIED
THIRD READING:
Councillor Dickerson, seconded by Councillor Brenner, moved that By-law Numbers
6413/04, 6414/04, 6415/04, 6416/04, 6417/04, 6418/04, 6419/04, 6420/04, 6421/04,
6422/04, 6423/04, 6424/04, 6425/04, 6426/04, 6427/04, 6428/04, 6429/04, 6430/04 and
6431/04, be adopted and the said by-laws be now read a third time and PASSED and
that the Mayor and Clerk sign the same and the seal of the Corporation be affixed
thereto.
CARRIED
(VI)
1.
OTHER BUSINESS
Councillor McLean enquired into the impact of OHIP premiums on the City of
Pickering.
Councillor McLean gave notice of a motion to restrict searchlights.
Councillor McLean stated his concern with respect to a letter from the Region
concerning the City of Pickering's Operations Centre as part of regional transit.
Mayor Ryan will forward a letter to the Region advising that the City will not
entertain the idea of relinquishing ownership of the Operations Centre.
Councillor Brenner questioned the rationale used to call a tender so late in the
year of an item passed in the 2004 Budget.
Councillor Brenner gave notice of a motion, seconded by Councillor McLean
concerning the City hosting a tax summit.
-12-
Council Meeting Minutes
Monday, December 20, 2004
7:30 PM
Councillor Dickerson gave notice of a motion, seconded by Councillor Johnson
with respect to war vets and street signs.
Councillor Johnson advised that he would be bringing a motion forward at the
January 17th Council Meeting for reconsideration of Report OES 39-04.
IVll) CONFIRMATION BY-LAW
By-law Number 6432104
Councillor Ashe, seconded by Councillor Dickerson, moved for leave to introduce a By-
law of the City of Pickering to confirm those proceedings of the Council of The
Corporation of the City of Pickering at its Special Meeting of December 20, 2004.
CARRIED
(w~)
ADJOURNMENT
The Meeting adjourned at 10:40 pm.
DATED
MAYOR
CITY CLERK
-13-
PICKERING
Appendix I
Executive Committee Report
EC 2004-20
That the Executive Committee of the City of Pickering having met on December 13,
2004, presents its twentieth report to Council and recommends:
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT PD 45-04
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION A 03/04
DAVID CHESTER
2195 UXBRIDGE-PICKERING TOWNLINE ROAD
(NORTH PART OF LOT 14, CONCESSION 9)
That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 03/04, be APPROVED as set
out in the draft by-law amendment attached as Appendix I to Report PD 45-
04, to amend the existing zoning on the subject lands to permit a bed and
breakfast and a 75 square metre home-based business, on lands being North
Part of Lot 14, Concession 9, City of Pickering.
That the amending zoning by-law to implement Zoning By-law Amendment
Application A 03~04, as set out in Appendix I to Report Number PD 45-04, be
FORWARDED to City Council for enactment.
CORPORATE SERVICES REPORT CS 49-04
2005 TEMPORARY BORROWING BY-LAW
That Report CS 49-04 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, be
received; and
That the temporary borrowing limit to meet 2005 current expenditures
pending receipt of taxes and other revenues be established at $25,000,000
for the period January 1, 2005 to September 30, 2005 inclusive, and
$12,500,000 thereafter until December 31, 2005; and
That the temporary borrowing limit for capital purposes for 2005 be
established at $15,000,000; and
That the attached By-law be read three times and passed; and
That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the
necessary actions to give effect thereto.
-14-
Appendix I
Executive Committee Report
EC 2004-20
15
CORPORATE SERVICES REPORT CS 56-04
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DEDICATED GAS TAX RESERVE FUND
1. That Report CS 56-04 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
concerning Establishment of the Dedicated Gas Tax Reserve Fund, be
received; and
2. That Council authorize and approve the establishment of the Dedicated Gas
Tax Reserve Fund; and
3. That Council endorse the use of the 2004 gas tax funds to offset Pickering's
share of the costs for funding the Ajax Pickering Transit Authority; and
4. That the attached by-law be read three times and passed; and
5. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the
necessary actions to give effect thereto.
CORPORATE SERVICES REPORT CS 45-04
TULLIS COTTAGE DESIGNATION
1705 SEVENTH CONCESSION ROAD
That Report CS 45-04 regarding the designation of the Tullis Cottage, 1705
Seventh Concession Road, be received; and
2. That the Tullis Cottage be designated as a Heritage Property.
o
CORPORATE SERVICES REPORT CS 46-04
EVER GREEN VILLA DESIGNATION
3970 BROCK ROAD
CONCESSION 6, LOT 19
1. That Report CS 46-04 regarding the designation of Ever Green Villa, 3970
Brock Road, be received; and
2. That the Ever Green Villa be designated as a Heritage Property.
-15-
Appendix I
Executive Committee Report
EC 2004-20
o
CORPORATE SERVICES REPORT CS 58-04
SECTION 354~357~358 OF THE MUNICIPAL ACT
-ADJUSTMENT TO TAXES
That Report CS 58-04 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
concerning Section 354/357/358 of the Municipal Act - Adjustment to Taxes,
be received; and
That the write-off of taxes as provided under Section 354/357/358 of the
MunicipalAct, 2001 be approved; and
That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the
necessary actions to give effect thereto.
OPERATIONS & EMERGENCY SERVICES REPORT OES 38-04
CONSTRUCTION PRIORITIES FOR REGIONAL ROADS
-WITHIN THE CITY OF PICKERING
That Report OES 38-04 recommending Regional Road construction priorities
within the City of Pickering be received, endorsed and forwarded to the
Regional Municipality of Durham requesting that its recommendations be
considered in the 2005 Budget and Four-Year Capital Forecast.
-16-
PI(_ K ElCl G
Appendix II
Audit Committee Report
AC 2004-01
1'7
That the Audit Committee of the City of Pickering having met on December 6, 2004,
presents its first report to Council and recommends:
1. 2004 AUDIT - AUDITOR'S WORKPLAN
That the Audit Plan, Year Ending December 31, 2004, submitted by Deloitte &
Touche, including the proposed increase in fees to provide for increased audit
standards as required by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, be
accepted.
2003 AUDIT MANAGEMENT LETTER
That the final comments as provided by the Director,' Corporate Services &
Treasurer regarding the "Auditor's Management Letter" dated June 7, 2004
submitted by Deloitte & Touche, be accepted.
CORPORATE SERVICES REPORT CS 32-04
PROCESS REVIEWS AND BEST PRACTICES
- OUTSIDE AGENCY SERVICES
1. That Report CS 32-04 of the Director, Corporate Services be received for
information; and
That the Audit Committee recommend to Council that the engagement of
service providers, as provided for in the Council Compensation and in the
Communications Policies, by Councillors be as described in this report less
the requirement that a Purchase Requisition and Purchase Order be issued;
and
3. That the appropriate staff of the City of Pickering be given authority to give
effect thereto.
-17-
RESOLUTION OF COUNCIL
DATE
MOVED BY
SECONDED BY
That the Report of the Executive Committee EC 2005-01, dated January 10,
2005, be adopted.
PICK EI, INIG
Appendix I
Executive Committee Report
EC 2005-01
19
That the Executive Committee of the City of Pickering having met on January 10, 2005,
presents its first report to Council and recommends:
OPERATIONS & EMERGENCY SERVICES REPORT OES 01-05
TENDER FOR PICKERING MUSEUM VILLAGE PROGRAM CENTRE
TENDER NO. T-6-2004
That Report OES 01-05 regarding the Pickering Museum Village Program
Centre, be received; and
That Tender No. T-6-2004 submitted by D. J. McRae Contracting Ltd. for the
construction of a new Program Centre at the Pickering Museum Village in the
amount of $751,236 (GST extra), be accepted; and
That the total gross project cost of $1,002,949.52 and a net project cost of
$937,336 including tender amount and other project costs identified in this
report be approved; and
That Council authorize entering into an agreement between the City and the
Pickering Museum Village Foundation for the shared cost and financing of the
Program Centre Project and the Hotel Restoration Project; and
That pre-budget approval be given in the amount of $547,336 for Program
Centre project including moving of hotel and financing to be included in the
2005 current and capital budgets and Council consider including $250,000 in
the 2006 Capital Budget for its share of the Hotel Restoration project; and
That Council authorize the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer to
finance the project as follows:
a) Debt financing through the Region of Durham in the amount of $451,000
for a period not exceeding 10 years, at a rate to be determined; and
b) Contributions from the Pickering Museum Village Foundation in the
amounts of $60,000 for Program Centre prOject and $36,000 for moving
the hotel; and
c) The balance of funding in the estimated amount of $336 be included in the
2005 Current Budget; and
5
Appendix I
Executive Committee Report
EC 2005-01
d)
Financing and repayment charges in the amount of approximately $57,700
be included in the annual Current Budget for the City of Pickering
commencing in 2006 and continuing thereafter until the loan is repaid; and
e) The Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer has certified that this loan
and the repayment thereof falls within the City's Debt and Financial
Obligations approved Annual Repayment Limit for debt and other financial
obligations for 2004 as established by the Province for municipalities in
Ontario; and
f) The Treasurer be authorized to take any actions necessary in order to
effect the foregoing; and
7. That staff at the City of Pickering be given the authority to give effect thereto.
CORPORATE SERVICES REPORT CS 02-05
2005 INTERIM LEVY AND INTERIM INSTALLMENT DUE DATES
o
That Report CS 02-05 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer, be
received; and
That an interim levy be adopted for 2005 for all of the realty property classes;
and
That the interim levy instalment due dates be February 25 and April 28, 2005;
and
That the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer be authorized to make any
changes or undertake any actions necessary, including altering due dates, in
order to ensure the tax billing process is completed; and
That the attached by-law, providing for the imposition of the taxes, be read
three times and passed by Council; and
That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the
necessary actions to give effect thereto.
-6-
Appendix I
Executive Committee Report
EC 2005-01
CORPORATE SERVICES REPORT CS 01-05
CONFIRMATION OF COMPREHENSIVE CRIME INSURANCE FOR 2005
That Report CS 0t-05 of the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
concerning Confirmation of Comprehensive Crime Insurance for 2005, be
received and forwarded to Council for information.
CORPORATE SERVICES REPORT CS 03-05
ESTABLISHMENT ROUGEMOUNT COOPERATIVE HOMES
NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH - 400 KINGSTON ROAD
That the letter from the Durham Regional Police Service dated December 7,
2004 endorsing the establishment of the Rougemount Cooperative Homes
Neighbourhood Watch, be received; and
That the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby endorses
the Rougemount Cooperative Homes Neighbourhood Watch and approves
the installation of Neighbourhood Watch signs at the entrances to the subject
area.
That the appropriate staff of the City of Pickering be given authority to give
effect thereto.
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE REPORT CAO 05-04
FLAG PROTOCOL
-POLICY/PROCEDURE
1. That Report CAO 05-04 regarding the Flag Protocol Policy for The
Corporation of the City of Pickering, be received; and
That Council endorse the Flag Protocol as set out in the Flag Protocol Policy
and Procedure with the following amendment:
a) That upon the death of a spouse, son or daughter of the Mayor or Member
of Council the flags at City properties be flown at half-mast.
-7-
Appendix I
Executive Committee Report
EC 2005-01
PROCLAMATIONS
"FAMILY LITERACY WEEK"
"MARRIAGE CHECKUP WEEK"
"RACING AGAINST DRUGS DURHAM WEEK"
That Mayor Ryan be authorized to make the following proclamations:
"Family Literacy Week" - January 24 - 31, 2005
"Marriage Checkup Week"-February 14- 18, 2005
"Racing Against Drugs Durham Week" - May I - 6, 2005
-8-
RESOLUTION OF COUNCIL
DATE
MOVED BY
SECONDED BY
That Report to Council PD 02-05 concerning the City's participation in the
Provincial GeoSmart Funding Program and Consultant Selection for
Pickering's Enterprise Geographic Information Project be RECEIVED; and
That staff be AUTHORIZED to enter into a legal agreement with the
Ministry of Natural Resources under the GeoSmart Funding Program to
develop and implement an Enterprise Geographic Information Project at a
'total project value not exceeding $750,000, including a GeoSmart grant of
up to $375,000, City funding up to $245,650, and 'in-kind' contributions up
to $129,350; and
bo
That the City's total financial obligation to the Project (exclusive of 'in-kind'
contributions) not exceed $245,650 including 2004 budget approvals of
$161,500 and a pre-budget approval for 2005 of $84,150; and
a. That iPLANcorp be RETAINED to implement Pickering's Enterprise
Geographic Information Project; and
That, in response to the City's RFP-04-2004, the proposal by iPLANcorp,
dated December 20, 2004, be APPROVED, with net costs of $9,931.20
for Phase One of the Project and per diem rates for Phase Two of the
Project as outlined in the proposal; and
That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to gibe
effect thereto.
REPORT TO
COUNCIL
Report Number: PD 02-05
Date: January 11,2005
From:
Nell Carroll
Director, Planning & Development
Subject:
Participation in Provincial GeoSmart Funding Program
Consultant Selection - Enterprise Geographic Information Project
Recommendation:
That Report PD 02-05 concerning the City's participation in the Provincial
GeoSmart Funding Program and Consultant Selection for Pickering's Enterprise
Geographic Information Project be RECEIVED;
28.
That staff be AUTHORIZED to enter into a legal agreement with the Ministry of
Natural Resources under the GeoSmart Funding Program to develop and
implement an Enterprise Geographic Information Project at a total project value
not exceeding $750,000, including a GeoSmart grant of up to $375,000, City
funding up to $245,650, and 'in-kind' contributions up to $129,350;
2b.
That the City's total financial obligation to the Project (exclusive of 'in-kind'
contributions) not exceed $245,650 including 2004 budget approvals of $161,500
and a pre-budget approval for 2005 of $84,150;
3a. That iPLANcorp be RETAINED to implement Pickering's Enterprise Geographic
Information Project;
3b.
That, in response to the City's RFP-04-2004, the proposal by iPLANcorp, dated
December 20, 2004, be APPROVED, with net costs of $9,931.20 for Phase One of
the Project and per diem rates for Phase Two of the Project as outlined in the
proposal;
That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to give effect
thereto.
Executive Summary: On August 4, 2003, the City submitted an application to the
Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) for provincial funding under the GeoSmart
program. GeoSmart is an initiative led by the MNR and is intended to facilitate and
enhance Geographic Information Systems in Ontario communities. The goal of the
program is to stimulate economic growth through the efficient delivery of geographic
information using Internet-based technologies. GeoSmart provides funding up to
50 percent of a project's total eligible costs.
Report PD 02-05
Subject: Consultant Selection
Enterprise Geographic Information System
Date:
January 11, 2005
Page 2
25
On September 29, 2004, the Ministry of Natural Resources announced that Pickering had
been successful in securing funding of up to $375,000 through GeoSmart. Approval of the
funding is conditional upon certain conditions and legal requirements. In anticipation of
GeoSmart approval the City, in its approved 2004 budget, identified projects that were
expected to qualify under the funding program, totalling $161,500. These funds have been
carried over to 2005 and qualify for this project. Considering the City's success in securing
GeoSmart funding, it is now appropriate to seek Council's approval for the expenditure of
funds in addition to those approved in the 2004 budget. 'In-kind' contributions by the City
and private sector of up to $129,350, together with $84,150 from the City's 2005 budget will
provide the total funding. It is still Council's prerogative to proceed or not proceed with this
project.
In order to undertake a project under this program, the assistance of a consultant with
expertise in Geographic Information Systems (GIS)is necessary. A Request for
Proposal (RFP) was made available on December 3, 2004, to select a consultant to
assist the City with the implementation of an Enterprise GIS Project. It will be the
consultant's task to work with the City to develop a project scope document, finalize the
funding agreement with GeoSmart, and to implement the Corporate GIS project. A total
of five proposals were received by the closing date of December 20, 2004. Four
proposals were deemed complete (see Attachment #1).
A selection Committee comprised of City staff reviewed the proposals and scored them
using pre-established criteria outlined in the RFP. The Committee interviewed the top
two firms and evaluated their performance.
Based on a combined evaluation exercise, the Committee recommends that iPLANcorp
be retained to undertake the Pickering Enterprise Geographic Information Project.
Financial Implications:
Phase One
RFP-4-2004
Disbursements
Contingency
G.S.T.
Total Purchase Cost
G.S.T. Rebate
Net Purchase Cost
$ 8,276.O0
827.6O (10%)
827.6O (10%)
695.18
10,626.38
(695.18)
$ 9,931.20
Phase Two
RFP-4-2004
Specific deliverables and costs to be determined through Project Scope Document
developed in Phase One, but will not exceed the amount stated in this report.
Report PD 02-05
Subject: Consultant Selection
Enterprise Geographic Information System
Date: January 11,2005
Page 3
Total Proiect
Total City financial obligation not to exceed
Total Project Value not to exceed
$245,650.00
$75O,OOO.OO
Source of Funds (see Attachment #2)
City 2004 - Approved - carried forward to 2005
City 2005 - Proposed
Ministry of Natural Resources - GeoSmart.
Sub Total Cash Expenditures
up to
$161,500.00
84,150.00
375,000.00
'In-Kind' contribution by City and private sector (minimum 20%)
Total Project Value
$620,650.00
upto $129,350.00
upto $750,000.00
Background: On August 4, 2003, the City submitted an application for provincial
funding under the GeoSmart program. GeoSmart is a $32 million SuperBuild initiative
led by the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) and is intended to facilitate and
enhance Geographic Information Systems in Ontario communities. GeoSmart provides
funding up to 50 percent of a project's total eligible costs, generally not exceeding
$500,000 per project. Projects will focus on accessing information and implementing
technologies to address a variety of business needs including economic development,
land use planning, and asset management and emergency services.
The City's initial project submission required total funding of $1,075,000 including
$499,000 from the Province (GeoSmart), $300,000 from the City, and the remainder in
the form of vendor discounts and 'in-kind' contributions including staff time. The key
project deliverables as identified in the Application for Funding submission included
developing a GIS strategic plan, installing hardware and software, creating and enhancing
data and databases, and implementing various mapping and data applications. A
majority of the work involves the use of consultants, as required by GeoSmart.
The majority of the City's financial contribution to the project was approved in the 2004
capital and current budgets, while awaiting approvals from the MNR. Council approved
funds totalling $161,500 from accounts in the Information Technology Section and
Planning & Development Department budgets. These funds have been carried over to
2005 to allow implementation of the project in 2005 and 2006.
On September 29, 2004, the City received confirmation of funding approval from
MNR to a maximum of $375,000, subject to a series of conditions as identified by the
GeoSmart Advisory Panel. The reduction in approved funds from GeoSmart requires
the City to reassess the key deliverables of the project. Although we still expect to
accomplish the majority of deliverables outlined in the initial funding submission, the
final Project Scope remains to be determined through further review by the City and its
consultant over the next two months. To qualify for GeoSmart funding, a final legal
agreement must be secured with MNR by March 31,2005.
Report PD 02-05
Subject: Consultant Selection
Enterprise Geographic Information System
Date:
January 11,2005
Page 4
2?
The Enterprise GIS project involves two phases, the first being the development of a
Project Scope, and the second being project implementation. Retention of a consultant
specializing in GIS is necessary to assist City staff in the development of the Project
Scope, finalize the funding agreement with GeoSmart, and to implement the Corporate
GIS project. The Project Scope document will outline project deliverables, timelines,
milestones and costs. Anticipated deliverables to be identified in the Phase One
Project Scope include:
· the creation and enhancement of databases for survey documents, storm
sewers, street lighting, fire hydrants, sidewalks and corporate addresses;
· using orthophotography, creation and enhancement of databases for building
roof prints, drainage and bodies of water, trails, parks, and parking lots;
· software applications, including ArclMS (web based mapping tool), letter of credit
control module, letter of compliance module;
· staff training on the methodologies used in data creation and maintenance; and,
· Phase Two implementation costs.
Phase Two involves implementation of the deliverables identified in the Project Scope
document. The extent of consultant involvement in Phase Two will be determined
through the Phase One Project Scope exercise.
RFP for Consulting Assistance
A staff Committee was formed to create an RFP for consulting assistance and
undertake consultant selection, consisting of:
G.A. Paterson - Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
Neil Carroll- Director, Planning & Development
Jon Storms - Manager, Information Technology
lan Bishop - Supervisor, Information & Support Services
Bob Kuzma - Purchasing Analyst
A Request for Proposal was made available on December 3, 2004, to select a consultant
to assist the City of Pickering with the implementation of an Enterprise GIS Project. The
City distributed 16 requests for proposals to geomatics consultants with five returned by
the closing date of December 20, 2004. Four proposals were deemed complete. To
ensure a fair review, proposals were evaluated according to pre-determined criteria.
o$
Report PD 02-05
Subject: Consultant Selection
Enterprise Geographic Information System
Date: January 11,2005
Page 5
The selection Committee met on December 22, 2004, to evaluate the proposals and to
select firms for interview. A point formula approach was used to score the proposals on
an evaluation criteria matrix. Each member of the selection Committee scored each
proposal according to the criteria headings described below:
· overall quality of the Proposal;
· bidder's qualifications and expertise;
· clear demonstration of GIS experience working with a multi-disciplined team;
· bidder's past record (based on similar projects);
· identification of key issues and understanding of the project;
· approaches and methods for completing project scope document;
· consulting fees for Phase One, and per diem rates for Phase Two;
· work program and timetable;
· general knowledge of the City of Pickering (past, present and future); and,
· value-added services offered.
The Committee interviewed the top two firms and evaluated their performance. Based
on a combined evaluation exercise, the Committee recommends that iPLANcorp be
retained to undertake the Pickering Enterprise Geographic Information Project.
The RFP submission and presentation by iPLANcorp reflected a strong understanding
of the City's project and the GeoSmart program, iPLANcorp has successfully
implemented projects of similar scope for the Municipality of Clarington and the City of
Greater Sudbury. iPLANcorp was ranked highest by the Committee in both elements of
the evaluation, was the lowest bidder for Phase One, and had competitive per diem
rates for Phase Two.
Funding
The total upset limit of the City's cash financial commitment to Phase One and
Phase Two is $245,650. This will include $161,500 already approved in previous City
budgets, and $84,150 additional funds as a pre-budget approval for 2005. The maximum
GeoSmart funding commitment is $375,000. In order to maximize the benefits of the
GeoSmart grant there may be need for flexibility in how specific City approved and
proposed funds are allocated within the project. The total project value will not exceed
$750,000 and will be a combination of City cash funds, GeoSmart cash funds, vendor
discounts, and 'in-kind' contributions including consultant and City staff time.
Report PD 02-05
Subject: Consultant Selection
Enterprise Geographic Information System
Date: January 11,2005
Page 6
Attachments:
1. Supply & Services Memo (dated December 22, 2004)
2. Source of Funds
Prepared By:
& Support Services
Endorsed By:
Nell Carro~-L---~
Director, Pla"nhTng & Development
Gillis Paterson
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
.,.~an Storms
nager, Information Technology
,Purchasing Anfj~lyst
lB:Id
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
(Acting) Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering City CoUfi
.'" .,..i ,~ ¢.~ , Il
Tho~rrlaS J. Quinn, ief Admi
SO
ATTACHMENT/__ / TO
RE~0m ~, PD_ O2-O~
CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTNENT
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
December 22, 2004
Nell Carroll
Director, Planning & Development
G.A. Paterson
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
Jon Storms
Manager, Information Technology
lan Bishop
Supervisor, Information & Support Services
From: Bob Kuzma
Purchasing Analyst
Subject:
Request for Proposal- Pickering Enterprise GIS Implementation Project
No. RFP-4-2004
Terms of reference for the above request for proposals were provided to six (6)
consulting firms. An advertisement was placed on the City's website on December 6,
2004 and the Community Page on December 15, 2004, which resulted in the request
for a copy of the Terms of Reference from an additional nine (9) firms, for a total of
fifteen (15).
Five (5) proposals have been received by the deadline of 12:00 noon Monday,
December 20, 2004. A preliminary compliance checklist and pricing summary is as
follows:
Item 6.i - Executive Summary of the Proposal
Item 6.2 -Introduction
Item 6.3 - General knowledge of the City of Picketing (past, present and future)
Item 6.4 - Understanding of the Project
Item 6.5 - Approach to the Project
Item 6.6 - Company Qualifications
Item 6.7' - Company Credentials
Item 6.8 -Work Program
Item 6.9 - Project Team
Item 6.10 - Pricing
RFP - 4 - 2004
December 22, 2004
Page 2
Com )liance Checklist
Consulting Firm 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 6.10
MTi o o o , . , , o .
ESRI , , , o , o , , ,
eSOLUTIONS . . . . . . . . · ·
Sierra · . . . . · · · . ·
IPLAN · . . . . · · . ·
Pricinq Summary
Consulting Firm Phase 1 Staff Per Diem Rates - Phase 2
MTi $69,550.00 $1,000 $800 $640
eSOLUTIONS $30,338.78 $880 $824 $608 $512
Sierra Solutions $14,000 $1,400 $990 $950 $930
IPLAN $8,276 $1,050 $768 $704 $320
ESRI Canada* Not considered
*The proposal submitted by ESRI Canada, contravenes Terms of Reference,
Information to Bidders - Item 2.11, as their total document was marked
confidential. In accordance with Terms of Reference, Section 8, Item 8.4 states:
Submissions are to conform to the Terms of Reference set out herein.
'Submissions failing to do so will not be considered.
To have submittals available as soon as possible to provide the Selection
Committee an optimum amount of time for evaluation, the summary is brief to
introduce proposals into the evaluation phase. A more subjective review is
envisioned when the Selection Committee becomes involved. Should any
information appear missing during the evaluation phase, please contact me as soon
as possible.
A Selection Committee meeting has been arranged for Wednesday, December 22,
2004 at 2:15 PM to review the submissions and evaluation criteria. One copy of
each proposal is being provided directly to each member of the Selection
Committee with a copy of this memorandum. The evaluation form will be reviewed
and committee member will be requested to review the submissions and complete
the evaluation forms.
A second meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, January 4, 2005 at 2:00 PM to
review the evaluation forms and schedule vendor interviews during the week of
January 4 to 7, 2005, if necessary.
If you requ. i,ce further information or assistance, please feel free to contact me.
B./ Kuzn4a~' -' t// --
Purchasing An¢lyst
3~
REPORT
Source of Funds:
2004 -Approved - Carried forward to 2005
Project Code Description Amount Capital/
Current
I.T. 04-2196-001-01 AutoCAD Software Upgrades $7,000 Capital
I.T. 04-2196-002-05 AutoCAD Workstations $16,500 Capital
I.T. 04-2196-00207 MP&E- Plotter $19,000 Capital
I.T. 04-2196-004-06 P&D- Phase 1 -ArclMS $55,000 Capital
I.T. 04-2196-004-12 MP&E- Forest Management Sys. $6,000 Capital
I.T. 04-2196-004-13 MP&E - Traffic Analysis $9,000 Capital
I.T. 04-2196-004-22 MP&E- ESRI ArcVIEW Licences $12,000 Capital
I.T. 04-2196-2396 AMANDA Version Upgrade $12,000 Current
P&D 2611-2392 GeoSmart - Technical Assistance $15,000 Current
P&D 2126-2392 AMANDA System Consulting $10,000 Current
Total $161,500
2005 - Proposed
Project Code Description Amount Capital/
Current
I.T. 05-2196-001-04 AutoCAD Software Upgrades $10,500 Capital
I.T. 05-2196-004-06 MP&E- AutoCAD Licence $5,000 Capital
I.T. 05-2196-004-15 P&D - Phase 2 - ArclMS $26,000 Capital
I.T. 05-2196-004-17 MP&E- ESRI ArcVIEW Licences $8,900 Capital
I.T. 05-2196-004-23 Large Bed Scanner $23,750 Capital
2126-2392 AMANDA System Consulting $10,000 Current
Total $84,150
*All items are paid for from current funds
Ministry of Natural Resources - GeoSmart
Description Amount Source
Financial assistance Up to $375,000
RESOLUTION OF COUNCIL
DATE
MOVED BY
SECONDED BY
la)
That the City of Pickering not consent to the Region of Durham Transit By-
law #85-2004 regarding the transfer of Lower-Tier Municipal Transit
Services to the Region; and
2a)
That, notwithstanding the above, the City of Pickering supports the
amalgamation of transit across the Region as a Regional Transit Service
and approves continued staff negotiations to resolve outstanding issues,
with a new report to Regional Council resolving these issues by June 30,
2005.
OR
lb)
That the City of Pickering consent to the Region of Durham Transit By-law
#85-2004 regarding the transfer of Lower-Tier Municipal Transit Services
to the Region; and
2b)
That City staff continue to negotiate with Region staff, a reasonable
solution, for the Region's use only of a portion of the City's Operations
Centre for bus storage.
REPORT TO
COUNCIL
Report Number: CAO 03-05
Date: January 13, 2005
From:
Everett Buntsma
(Acting) Chief Administrative Officer
Subject:
Region of Durham Business Case Analysis
- for the Potential Transfer of Lower-Tier
- Municipal Transit Services
- Region of Durham By-law#85-2004
File: D-7000
Recommendation:
la)
That the City of Pickering not consent to the Region of Durham Transit By-law
#85-2004 regarding the transfer of Lower-Tier Municipal Transit Services to the
Region; and
2a)
That,' notwithstanding the above, the City of Pickering supports the
amalgamation of transit across the Region as a Regional Transit Service and
approves continued staff negotiations to resolve outstanding issues, with a new
report to Regional Council resolving these issues by June 30, 2005.
OR
lb)
That the City of Pickering consent to the Region of Durham Transit By-law #85-
2004 regarding the transfer of Lower-Tier Municipal Transit Services to the
RegiOn; and
2b)
That City staff continue to negotiate with Region staff, a reasonable solution, for
the Region's use only of a portion of the City's Operations Centre for bus
storage.
Executive Summary: The Region of Durham has prepared a business case which
has determined that there are significant benefits (non monetary) should the Region
amalgamate lower-tier transit services into one unified service.
The Region subsequently passed By-law #85-2004 which now requires a triple majority
approval.
City Council adoption of Recommendation lb) and 2b) above will confirm the City's
consent to amalgamate lower-tier transit services into a Regional service.
Report CAe 03-05
Subject: Region of Durham Business Case Analysis
For Potential Transfer of Lower-Tier Transit
Date: January 13, 2005
Page 2
Council's adoption of Recommendation la) and 2a) will reflect that although the City
supports the amalgamation of transit across the Region it cannot consent to By-law
#85-2004 until further study and negotiations between the City and Region staff to
resolve specific City concerns.
Financial Implications: Unknown, but will increase tax burden to the City taxpayers
to provide a more efficient and integrated Regional Transit Network.
Background:
Not Applicable
Attachments:
1. Regional Clerk's Letter
2. Regional By-law #85-2004
3. Regional Chair's Letter
Prepared By:
(Acting) Chief Administrative Officer
EB:mld
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickerels..---'-~'~
Thom~Ouihp~CChief Ad ministrative Officer
CORP0227-07/01
The Regional.
Municipality
of Durham
Clerk's Department
605 ROSSLAND RD. E.
PO BOX 623
WHITBY ON L1N 6A3
CANADA
905-668-7711
1-800-372-1102
Fax: 905-668~9963
Emait:
clerks@region.durham.on.ca
wWW. region.durham.on.ca
Pat M, Madill, AJ~.C,T., CMM !
Regional Clerk
ROUTING
MAY¢.'R
COLJhC,L LOR;"
AP, M!N;:'; .;,,.l'? r~
DIR./CUMM..:. :'¢'.' .: :
DtR./CORR ~JVC~
DIR.,"PLAhN.ff'C'
~IR.:PUiJ. V'.' O~ i,: S v'''/'
FtRF
TREASUR£~;
I% . i'¢r2¢/1: 4-______..~
,,~.
"Service Excellence
for our Communities"
December 17, 2004
Mr. D.G. McKay
Clerk
Town of Whitby
575 Rossland Road Eas
Whitby ON LIN 2MI
DEC 2 2 2004
,/ !
RE: REGION OF DURHAM TRANSIT BY-LAW
OUR FILE: T05-01
Mr. McKay, at a meeting held on December 15, 2004, Regional
Council passed By-law'#85-2004, being a by-law to transfer all of. the
lower-tier power relating to. public transportation systems, other than
highways, to the Region from all of its lower-tier municipalities.
In accordance with the Municipal Act the by-law shall not come into
fome unless:
~)
a majority o[ all votes on the council of the upper-tier
municipality are cast in its favour;
~)
after the by-law is passed, a majority of the councils of all its
lower-tier municipalities have passed .resolutions giving their
consent to the by-law; and
the total number of electors in the lower-tier municipalities that
pass resolutions under clause (b) form a majority of all the
electors in the. upper-t!er municipality.
,ccordingly, could you please place this before your Council at its next
~eeting in order to ascertain their position as it relates to part b)
bove.
· A response on or before January 18, 2005 would be appreciated in
order that Regional Council may consider the issue at its January 19,
2005 meeting.
100% Post C~nsumer
Attached for your reference, is a copy of By-law #85-2004, as well as a
· ' ~ copy of the recommendations passed by Council at their meeting held
.... On December 15, 2004.,
P.M. Madill, A.M.C.T., CMM I
Regional Clerk
PMM/cg
C;
D. Allingham, Totten Sims Hubicki
R.J. Clapp, Commissioner of Finance
C. Curtis, Commissioner of Works
G. Johns, Commissioner of Human Resources
B.J. Roy, Regional Solicitor
A.L. Georgieff, Commissioner of Planning
G.H. Cubitt, Chief Administrative Officer
R. Anderson, Regional Chair
ATTACHMENT fi:
RECOMMENDATIONS APPROVED BY DURHAM REGIONAL
COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 15, 2004 REGARDING THE POTENTIAL
TRANSFER OF LOWER-TIER MUNICIPAL TRANSIT SERVICES TO
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM:
a)
THAT Report #2004-RTIC-7 of the Commissioners of
Planning, Works and Finance, titled "Business Case
Analysis for the Potential Transfer of Lower-Tier Municipal
Transit Services to the Regional Municipality of Durham" by
Totten Sims Hubicki (TSH) be received for information;
b)
THAT Report #2004-RTIC-8 of the Commissioners of
Planning, Works and Finance, summarizing the responses
received to date from five of the eight area municipalities,
namely, Ajax, Brock, Pickering, Scugog, and Uxbridge be
received for information;
c)
· THAT the following recommendations contained in the TSH
report be endorsed, subject to the Region of Durham Transit
By-law receiving triple majority approval:
The transfer of the transit responsibilities of the C!ty of
Pickering, Town of Ajax, Town of Whitby, City of
Oshawa, Municipality of Clarington and Handi Transit
Inc. to the Region of Durham;
Regional staff be directed to present to Committee
and Council for their approval an appropriate net-cost
allocation formula for the levy of Regional transit
taxes at a local municipal level;
Apply the "Cumming Principle" to any transit-related
asset transfers, and all transfer-eligible assets of
Handi-Transit Inc.;
Adopt the t~ollowing timetable for Regional Transit
implementation:
Transition Period - Date of Transit By-Law approval to
effective date of service transfer (January 1, 2006):
- Resolution of critical HR and union issues
including union certification;
- Staffing of the new Regional Transit
Department;
Development and implementation of
operational and financial controls;
Obtain Public Vehicle Operating LiCense for
the Region of Durham to operate transit; and
Asset transfer.
3g
Completion of Transfer- complete transfer of service
and initiate Regional transit service on January 1,
2006;
Inform the Provincial and Federal governments of the
creation of a Durham Regional Transit system and
pursue the acquisition of additional Provincial/Federal
government funding;
Extend the mandate of Regional Transit
Implementation Committee (RTIC) to oversee the
transfer of transit services;
The Regional Working Committee be the Regional
Transit Implementation Committee and be active
through 2005 to oversee all actions necessary to
complete the transfer, including but not limited to,
action items contained in Tables 11.1 to 11.6 of the
TSH Report, and that the existing area municipal
Transit Advisory Committees be utilized in an
advisory role to RTIC during transition up to and
including the year 2006; and
In the year 2005 the RTIC Committee will decide
which Committee will govern the Regional Transit
System for the year 2006;
d)
THAT the following additional recommendations be
approved, subject to the Region of Durham Transit By-law
receiving triple majority approval:
i)
The net cost allocation formula for the levy of
Regional transit taxes at a local municipal level be
assessed on the basis of 75% revenue hours of
service and 25% weighted assessment and be
phased into a 100% weighted assessment basis over
the next seven years; and
e)
ii)
The 2005 Regional Transit Budget for area municipal
transit related purposes be shared on the basis of a
75% share to the area municipalities with a 25%
share to be retained by the Region with the Regional
shortfall related to 2005 Regional Transit Transition
costs to be financed from a source determined by the
Commissioner of Finance and further that the Region
of Durham apply to the Province of Ontario for
Regional transit transition funding;
THAT the following revisions to the proposed Region of
Durham Transit By-law, as set out in Attachment #3 to
Report #2004-RTIC-8 of the Commissioners of Planning,
Works and Finance, be approved:
Clause 2(b) be amended by adding the words "at a
minimum" following the words "The Region shall"; and
ii)
The following clause be inserted as clause 2(p) under
the heading "Surplus Assets":
"Any real property acquired by the Region from a
lower-tier municipality pursuant to clause 2(d) of this
by-law and deemed surplus for transit purposes shall
be returned to the lower-tier municipality from which it
was transferred at no cost.";
THAT the Region of Durham Transit By-Law [Attachment #3
to Report #2004-RTIC-8 as modified by recommendation e)
· above] providing for the transfer of the lower-tier power
relating to public transportation systems, other than
highways (transit) to the Region, and encompassing the
following terms and conditions for the transfer, be approved:
As of the effective date, the Region shall operate,
maintain and regulate the use of a Public
Transportation System for both conventional and
specialized services;
The Region shall at a minimum begin its service
based on the existing overall revenue hours of
service in effect as of May 1, 2004, with the addition
of the Rossland/Taunton "beltline" service jointly
planned by the City of Oshawa and the Town of
Whitby, the planned service realignments in Oshawa
and Whitby for implementation in 2004/2005 and
the Iower-tie~ municipalities 'r~U~'st~'r~ c~0-~enting --~
resolutions on or before January 18, 2005; and
h)
THAT a copy of Report #2004-RTIC-8 of the Commissioners
of Planning, Works and Finance be forwarded to all area
municipalities in Durham Region.
,,.%
The Regional Municipality o[ Durham
To: The Regional Transit Implementation Oommittee
From: Oommissioners of Planning, Finanoe and Works
Report No.: 2004-RT10-8
Date: December 9, 2004
.SUBJECT:
Area Municipal Comments on Report No. 2004-RTIC-7 (Subject: Business Case
Analysis for the Potential Transfer of Lower-Tier Municipal .Transit Services to the
Regional Municipality of Durham)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
THAT the Regional Transit Implementation Committee (RTIC) recommend to Regional
Council that Report-2004-RTIC-8, summarizing the responses received to date from five
of the eight area municipalities, namely, Ajax, Brock, Pickering, Scugog, and Uxbridge,
and the suggested revisions to the proposed Region of Durham Transit By-Law, be
considered along with the recommendations of Report 2004-RTIC-7.
REPORT:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
1.1
On November 4, 2004, the Regional Transit Implementation Committee
(RTIC) considered Commissioners' Report 2004-RTIC-7. This repod
summarized the findings of the Business Case Analysis by Totten Sims
Hubicki. Limited (TSH), provided staff comments on their findings, and
recommended that the Business Case Analysis be endorsed and that a by-
law be enacted to transfer the responsibility for transit from the lower tier
municipalities to the Region, subject to a number of terms and conditions.
Based on deliberations at the meeting, RTIC endorsed the results of the
Business Case Analysis and a supporting by-law, for approval by the
Committee of the Whole.
1.2
At a meeting held on 'November 10, 2004, the Committee of the Whole
considered the recommendation o[ RTIC and adopted the following
resolution:
Report No.:
2004-RTIC-8
3.1.3
3.1.4
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.2.4'
The intent of clause (2b) in the by-law is to ensure that the Region has a
degree of certainty with the service it will assume. The Regional Solicitor has
advised that the clause is intended not to bind the Region to the existing level
of service in perpetuity. To clarify its intent, it is recommended that the
phrase "shall maintain" in clause (2b) of the by-law be replaced with
"shall begin its service based on".
With respect to conventional transit service in the north, the preliminary
service plans developed as part of the Consultant's Business Case Analysis
recommends the deployment of one dial-a-ride bus (starting 2006) to service
the three northern municipalities. The detailed service planning exercise
proposed for the transition year (2005), and annual service planning
thereafter, would determine the priorities for service enhancements across
the entire Region on an annual basis. Accordingly, it is recommended that
the Townships' requests be considered during the detailed service
planning exercise in 2005..
Transfer of Assets
Clause (2d) of the by-law recommends the adoption of the Cumming PrinCiple
- i.e. all local transit assets must be transferred to the Region at no cost as
taxpayers should not be expected to pay for the assets twice. This includes all
assets, but not be limited to: vehicles and equipment; lands and premises
including garages, terminals and shelters; and other transit amenities.
In commenting on this matter, the Town of Ajax has requested that it retain
the ownership of its transit facility on Westney Road (near Ajax GO sta. t.i.o..n),
and that the Region lease the facility for a r{ominal rent Inet to Region paying
all expenses).
On the same matter, the City of Pickering has requested that its Qperations
Centre (on Brock Road) not be considered as part of the transfer of assets, as
the facility is currently being rented to Ajax-Picketing Transit AUthority (APTA)
for the use of storage and office space.
TSH has determined that all of the existing assets would continue to be
required after the transfer to operate transit at the Regional level. Therefore,
the ownership of all transit related assets must be transferred to the Region.
Report No.:
2004-RTIC-8
Page No. 5
3.2.5
3.2.6
3.2.7
3.3
3,3.1
Accordingly, it is recommended that the Cumming principle be followed
for all assets related to transit, subject to confirmation of inventories,
appropriate asset valuations and environmental site assessments, as
per clause (2e) in the by-law.
Commenting on the asset transfer, the three Townships have requested that
the by-law be reviewed to ensure that assets as at May 1,2004 cannot be
sold, mortgaged or otherwise encumbered, and that there is no incurrence of
any significant financial obligations (contracts, borrowing, debenturing, etc.)
and depletion of cash, reserves and other assets before the Effective Date of
Transfer.
Clause (2m) of the by-law specifies that:
"During the period of time between the date that this by-law has received
the necessary triple majority approval and the Effective Date (the
"Transition Period"), any new or renewed transit-related contract, lease or
contractual obligation that requires a significant financial commitment
extending beyond the Effective Date shall require the approval of the
Region".
According to the wording of the by-law, during the transition year (i.e. 2005),
any act by the area municipalities that would require a "significant" financial
commitment beyond the Effective Date would have to be approved by
Regional Council. The Regional Solicitor has advised that this wording would
address the concerns expressed by the Townships, and has recommended
that upon receiving triple majority on the by-law, the definition of
"significant financial commitment" be ~larified to area municipalities
through appropriate guidelines.
Provincial Gas Tax Funding
Clause (2i) in the by-law states that after the Effective Date of Transfer, all
Provincial and Federal transit-related funding received by the lower-tier
municipalities shall be transferred to the Region, including but not limited to
funds received from such programs as the new Provincial Gas Tax Funding
Program.
10
Report No.:
2004-RTIC-8 Page No. 6
3.3.2
3.3.3
3.4
3.4.1
3.4.2
3.4.3
The three Townships have generally made similar comments on this matter.
They have requested that the Region assume responsibility for ensuring that
the provincial conditions of receiving the gas tax rebate for 2006 are satisfied
(including the undertaking of an asset management plan) and that the rebate
is not lost. They have also requested that the Region earmark their respective
2005 gas tax funds for enhancement of specialized transit services in their
respective Townships, in 2006 (refer to section 3.7.2 for response to requests
for service enhancements).
Should the responsibility for transit services be transferred, the Region will be
encumbered by the same conditions of the Provincial Gas Tax Funding
Program beginning in 2006, as are local municipalities for 2004 and 2005.
Therefore, it is recommended that the Region assume the responsibility
to ensure compliance with all provincial conditions for the Program.
2005 Regional Transit Funding
Report 2004-RTIC-7 recommended that the 2005 Regional Transit funding
matter be referred to the 2005 Regional business planning and budget
deliberations in order to determine the funding for transition and related costs
associated with the transfer.
The Town of Ajax and the three Townships have requested that the 2005
Regional Transit fund be divided between the area municipalities and the
Region on a ratio between 50/50 and 60/40 (in favour of area municipalities),
subject to negotiations and finalization by Treasurers. The Ci;ty of Pickering
has requested that the Region distribute this fund to area municipalities for
the 2005 operating year, at the same level 'as 2004.
The 2005 five-year economic and financial forecasts and related budget
guidelines, as approved, on December 1,2004, indicated that $4 million was
required for anticipated 2005 transition costs. It is therefore recommended
that the 2005 Regional Transit Funding matter be dealt with during the
2005 Regional business planning and budget deliberations.
tl
48,
Report No.:
2004-RTIC-8
Page No. 7
3.5.1
3.5.2
3.6
3.6.1
3.6.2
3.6.3
Governance for Regional Transit
The Business Case Analysis Report by TSH recommended that the new
Regional Transit Department report to a Joint Planning and Works
Committee. The Town of Ajax has requested that this Department repod to a
Committee of Regional Councillors reflecting ridership with the northern
municipalities (Brock, Uxbridge and Scugog) having one representative, Ajax,
Pickering, Whitby and Clarington each having one representative, and
Oshawa having two representatives.
The reporting mechanism recommended in the Business Case Analysis (i.e.
the transit department reporting to a Joint Planning and Works Committee)
builds on existing committee structures and would ensure that all area
municipalities are represented. As such, the Joint Planning and Works
Committee model is preferred in the short term. Once the transfer is
completed, it may be useful to review the reporting mechanism and
assess if a stand-alone transit committee would be beneficial.
Allocation of Regional Transit Costs
Report 2004-RTIC-7 recommended that staff be directed to present to
Committee and Council for their approval an appropriate net-cost allocation
formula for the levy of Regional transit taxes at a local municipal level.
The Town of Ajax has requested that the allocation of Regional Transit costs
be based on 50/50 ridership/assessment, phased in over 5 years to 100%
equalized assessment. The Town has further requested that the Region
utilize the Gen'eral Levy Rate Stabilization Reserve Fund in 2006 to mitigate
the tax rate increase resulting from the transfer of transit services.
The three Townships have requested that Regional Transit costs be allocated
on a 75/25 service/assessment basis across the eight municipalities. The
Township of Scugog has further requested that this allocation formula be
maintained for the first five years, with subsequent increases in non-
assessment allocation phased in over a further 5 year period, based on
average 5 year historic:al increases in ridership levels within each
. munic!pality.
12
Report No.:
2004-RTIC-8
Page No. 8
3.6.4
3.6.5
3.7
3.7.1
3.7.2
3.8
3.8.1
The City of Pickering has requested that the Regional Transit costs be
allocated on a 100% equalized assessment basis, as is the case for all other
Regional services.
Regional staff has provided and will continue to provide multiple net cost
allocation methods and the associated estimated property tax impacts,
including ones that recognize different levels of service, for Regional Council
review and approval. It would appear that the cost allocation would not be
based on a 100% equalized assessment, at least for the first 5 years.
Accordingly, it is recommended that an acceptable formula be developed
and presented to Regional Council prior to July 1, 2005.
Service Enhancements
The three TownShips have made requests for specific service enhancements,
as detailed in Attachment 2. As noted in Report 2004-RTIC-7, the Business
Case Analysis recommends undertaking of a detailed service planning
exercise during the transition year (i.e. 2005). It is recommended that the
detailed service planning take into consideration the enhancements
identified by the Townships.
With respect to dedicating the gas tax revenues received by the three
Townships in 2005 towards the enhancement of specialized transit service in
their respective municipalities in 2006, as noted earlier, it is important that
service enhancements be prioritized through the detailed service planning
exercise proposed for the transition year (2005). The full cost of providing
enhanced service in the nodh must be considered as pad of the service
planning exercise so that the full implicatio'ns are known. Accordingly, it is
recommended that the Townships' requests be considered as part of
the service planning exercise in 2005.
Unfunded Liabilities
In addition to the above, the City of Pickering has requested that the Region
provide a further report on unfunded liabilities for local municipalities for
review and comment. As noted in Repod 2004-RTIC-7, further examination
of un[untied liabilities has been planned as part of the transition work in
2005.
13
Report No.:
2004-RTIC-8
Page No. 9
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on a review of area municipal comments, it is recommended that the
revised by-law in Attachment 3 be used as the basis to further the triple
majority approval process.
A. L. Georgi~.C.l.P., R.P.P.
Commissioner of Planning
R.J. Clapp, CA
Commissioner of Finance
Commissioner of Works
RECOMMENDED FOR PRESENTATION TO COMMI'I-i'EE
Garry H. Cubitt, M.S.W.
Chief Administrative Officer
Attachments;
1. · Area Municipal Resolutions
2. Summary of Area Municipal Comments
3. Revised Region of Durham Transit By-Law
14
BY-LAW NUMBER 85-2004
OF
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM
A by-law to transfer all of the lower-tier power relating
to public transportation systems, other than highways,
to the Region from all of its lower-tier municipali(ies.
WHEREAS Section 189 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25 (the "Act")
provides that an upper-tier municipality may pass a by-law to provide for the transfer of
all or part of a lower-tier power to the upper-tier municipality from one or more of its
lower-tier municipalities which are specified in the by-law;
AND WHEREAS public transportation systems, other than highways, are defined
in Section 188 of the Act as a lower-tier power that may be transferred to an upper-tier
municipality;
AND WHEREAS the The Regional Municipality of Durham (the "Region") desires
to assume all of the power relating to public transportations systems other than
highways ("Public Transportation Systems") from all of its lower-tier municipalities;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED AND IT IS HEREBY ENACTED as a by-
law of The Regional Municipality of Durham through the Council thereof as follows:
All of the power of lower-tier municipalities with respect to Public Transportation
SystemS shall be transferred to the Region effective January 1,2006 (the
"Effective Date").
On the Effective Date, all rights and obligations and all assets and liabilities of
the lower-tier municipalities pertaining to or used for Public Transportation
Systems including all real and personal property and all interests and obligations
in any agreement, shall be transferred to the Region subject to the following
terms and conditions:
Operations
(a)
As of the Effective Date, the Region shall operate, maintain and regulate
the use of a Public Transportation System for both conventional and
specialized services.
(b)
The Region shall at a minimum begin its service based on the existing
overall revenue hours of service in effect as of May 1, 2004, with the
addition of the RosslandFFaunton "beltline" service jointly planned by the
City of Oshawa and the Town of Whitby, the planned service realignments
in Oshawa and Whitby for implementation in 2004/2005 and enhanced
specialized transit service in Oshawa as a result of a vehicle acquired in
2004.
(c)
After the Effective Date, the Region may enter into agreements wffh any
adjoining municipality or the Province for the provision of public
transportation services.
Asset Transfer
(d) All physical assets used forpublic transportation systems shall be
transferred to the~Re~Lor~wilhout compensation as of the Effective Date.
Assets shall include, but not be limited to,
(i) vehicles and equipment;
(ii) lands and premises including garages, terminals and shelters; and
(iii) other transit amenities.
(e)
The transfer of all transit-related assets shall be subject to confirmation of
inventories, appropriate asset valuations and environmental site
assessments. Such inventories shall include all transit-related assets of
the lower-tier municipalities and transit agencies as at the Effective Date.
(f)
Discretionary transit-related funds including reserves and reserve funds
existing on the Effective Date shall be transferred to the Region.
(g)
All transit-related development charge and other non-discretionary reserve
funds shall be transferred to the Region.
(h)
Lower-tier municipalities shall continue to collect transit development
charges 'where applicable until their by-laws expire or are repealed,
including periods beyond the Effective Date. All such development
charges shall be transferred to the Region. The transit-related provisions
of the development charges by-laws shall not be changed after this by-law
has received the necessary triple majority approval without the approval of
the Region.
(i)
After the Effective Date, all Provincial and Federal transit-related funding
received by the lower-tier municipalities shall be transferred to the Region,
including but not limited to funds received from such programs as the
Ontario Transit Vehicle Program (formerly the Transit Renewal Program),
the new Provincial Gas Tax Funding program for public transit and
potential federal programs such as a federal gas tax.
Liabilities
(J)
(k)
As of the Effective Date, the lower-tier municipalities shall be relieved of
all liabilities in relation to any assets transferred to the Region.
The amount and future payments of any unfunded liabilities existing at the
Effective Date shall be determined through negotiations between the
Region and the lower-tier municipalities.
Personnel
All transit employees with permanent full time and pad time positions,
both exempt and union, that are exclusively employed in transit by the
lower-tier municipalities, transit operators and Handi Transit Inc. as of the
date that this by-law comes into force shall become employees of the
Region as of the Effective Date.
Transition Period
(m)
During the period of time between the date that this by-law has received
the necessary tdple majority approval and the Effective Date (the
"Transition Period"), any new or renewed transit-related contract, lease or
contractual obligation that requires a significant financial commitment
extending beyond the Effective Date shah require the approval of the
Region.
(n)
(o)
Handi Transit Inc. shall be dissolved prior to the Effective Date in order to
facilitate the transfer of transit-related assets to the Region.
During the Transition Period, the Region and the lower-tier municipalities
shall negotiate and enter into agreements for the transfer of all assets,
liabilities and personnel on terms that are consistent with this by-law. Any
matters not agreed to within three (3) months of the Effective Date may, at
52
the request of the Region or a lower-tier municipality, be determined by
arbitration under the provisions of the Ontario Arbitrations Act,.
Surplus Assets
(P)
Any real property acquired by the Region from a lower-tier municipality
pursuant to clause 2(d) of this by-law and deemed surplus for transit
purposes shall be returned to the lower-tier municipality from which it was
transferred at no cost.
BY-LAW read a first time this 15th day of December, 2004.
BY-LAW read a second time this 15th day of December, 2004.
BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this 15th day of December, 2004.
Roge¢ Anderson, Regional Chair P.M. Madill, Regional Clerk
The Regional
Munidipality
of Durham
Januaw 6,2005
Mayor David Ryan
City of Pickering
I The Esplanade
Pickering, ON
L1V 6K7
Dear Mayor Ryan:
Re: Regional Transit
Office of the Regional Chair
605 ROSSLAND ROAD E.
PO BOX 623
WHITBY Ok! L1N 6A3
CANADA
905-668-7'711
1-800-372-1102
Fax: 905-668-1567
Email? roger, anderson@
region ,durham;on.ca
www. reg~or~.durham.on.ca
Roger M. Anderson
Regional Chair
"Sar[lice Excellence
Cot oDr'.Comrnt~itie$"
I am writing to confirm the intention of Regional Transit By-Law No. 85-2004 with
specific reference to the City of Pickering Operations Centre located at 2570
Tillings Road.
First, the by-law is only intended to apply to assets or'those parts of joint-use
assets' that are used for transit-related purposes. Therefore, in the case of the
Operations Centre, the interition is that only that portion of the facility that is used
to park/store buses (approximately 30% of the overall 'facility) would continue to
be used by the Region for transit purposes. Second, it is intended that the
specific terms of the. transfer of any.'jo!nt;use.asset would be negotiated with each
lower-tier municipality (see 'clause 2(o) of the by-law) after the by-law has
received the necessary triple majority approval. This reflects the fact that it v~as
simply not possible to inventory and evaluate all joint-use assets (like the
Operations Centre) in every lower-tier municipality and determine how such
assets or parts of such assets could be transferred withoUt extensive and detailed
discussions with all affected parties. Third, the by-law was structured to ensure
that all transit-related assets and liabilities of all eight Iower,tier municipalities
would be' dealt with in an equitable and consistent manner.
F. urther, the terms that we discussed for the use of the tranSit portion of the
Operations Centre (i.e. $2.00 per year for a m~nimum of 10 years, with the Region
assuming its share of the occupancy coSts), seem reasonable. Assuming that the
Transit Byqaw receives a triple majority approval, Regional staff would finalize
these terms with your staff, together with any other related matters, as per clause
2(o) of the. by-law. At that point, Regional Council would be in a position to
consider that.such terms be incorporated intc~ the Region's agreement with the
City.
I hope this helps clarify matters.
Yours truly,
Regional Chair
C: Messrs. G. Cubitt; A. Georgieff
10094 Past Consumer
RESOLUTION OF COUNCIL
DATE
MOVED BY
SECONDED BY
Pursuant to Section 42 of By-law Number 3665191 (Procedural By-
law), at the Council Meeting of December 20, 2004, Councillor
Johnson, gave notice to reconsider the motion to refer the
resolution below to the 2005 Budget Meeting. In order for the
quotation to purchase a Telescopic Boom Excavator to be adopted,
the following motions must be considered:
That Resolution #170104(a) passed on December 20, 2004 to
refer the motion to purchase a Telescopic Boom Excavator to
the 2005 Budget Meeting be reconsidered. (This motion
should be passed)
That Resolution #170104 to purchase a Telescopic Boom
Excavator be referred to the 2005 Budget Meeting. (This
motion should be defeated)
The following resolution can now be considered:
1. That Report OES 39-04 regarding the supply and delivery of a Telescopic
Boom Excavator be received; and
2. That Quotation No. Q-41-2004 submitted by Strongco Equipment for the
supply and delivery of a Badger Model 460 Telescopic Boom Excavator with
the specified attachments in the amount of $294,662 (GST and PST extra) be
accepted; and
3. That the total purehase cost of $338,861.30 and a net purchase cost of
$318,234.96 including specified attachments for the equipment be appreved;
and
4. That the total revised funding of $318,234.96 with $255,000 of five year debt
as provided for in the 2004 Capital Budget and an additional $63,000 in a five
year internal loan and $235 from current funds be approved; and
5. That Council authorize the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer to
finance the purchase through the issuance of debt; and
a)
That debt financing through the Region of Durham in the amount of
$255,000 for a period not exceeding 5 yeare, at a rate to be determined
be approved; and
b)
That financing and repayment charges in the amount of $58,900 be
included in the annual current budget for the City of Pickering
commencing in 2005 and continuing thereafter until the loan is repaid;
and
c)
That the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer has certified that this
loan and the repayment there of falls within the City's debt and financial
obligations approved annual repayment limit for debt and other financial
obligations for 2004 as established by the Province for Municipalities in
Ontario; and
d)
That the Treasurer be authorized to take any actions necessary in order
to effect the foregoing; and
6. That staff at The City of Pickering be given the authority to give effect hereto.
55
PICKERING
REPORT TO
COUNCIL
Report Number: OES 39-04
Date: December 2, 2004
From:
Richard W. Holborn, P. Eng.
Division Head, Municipal Property & Engineering
Subject:
Supply and Delivery of One Telescopic Boom Excavator
Q-41-2004
Recommendation:
1. That Report OES 39-04 regarding the supply and delivery of a Telescopic Boom
Excavator be received and that;
2. Quotation No. Q-41-2004 submitted by Strongco Equipment for the supply and
delivery of a Badger Model 460 Telescopic Boom Excavator with the specified
attachments in the amount of $294,662 (GST and PST extra) be accepted;
3. The total purchase cost of $338,861.30 and a net purchase cost of $318,234.96
including specified attachments for the equipment be approved;
Total revised funding of $318,234.96 with $255,000 of five year debt as provided for
in the 2004 Capital Budget and an additional $63,000 in a five year internal loan and
$235 from current funds be approved; and
5. That Council authorize the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer to finance the
purchase through the issuance of debt.
a) Debt financing through Region of Durham in the amount of $255,000 for a
period not exceeding 5 years, at a rate to be determined be approved;
b)
Financing and repayment chargeS in the amount of $58,900 be included in
the annual current budget for the City of Pickering commencing in 2005 and
continuing thereafter until the loan is repaid; and
c)
The Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer has certified that this loan and
the repayment there of falls within the City's debt and financial obligations
approved annual repayment limit for debt and other financial obligations for
2004 as established by the Province for Municipalities in Ontario; and
d) The Treasurer be authorized to take any actions necessary in order to effect
the foregoing; and
6. Staff at The City of Pickering be given the authority to give effect hereto.
Report
Subject
OES 39-04 Date: December 2, 2004
Supply and Delivery of One Telescopic Boom Excavator Page 2
Q 41-2004
5?
Executive Summary:
The purchase of a Telescopic Boom Excavator has been identified and approved in the
2004 Capital Budget. This machine will replace Municipal Property & Engineering
Division's existing unit number 110, a 1989 Badger 460. The Hydroscopic Boom
Excavator is an integral piece of heavy equipment capable of performing a variety of
tasks. Curb and sidewalk construction and repair, ditching to address standing water
concerns, as well as trenching and excavating are jobs performed with this versatile
piece of equipment. Supply & Services invited two (2) vendors to participate in the
bidding process. Upon careful examination of all quotations received by Supply &
Services as well as extensive field evaluation and testing, the Municipal Property &
Engineering Division recommends acceptance of the low bid submitted by Strongco
Equipment in the amount of $294,662.00 (GST and PST extra), and that the total net
purchase cost of $318,234.96 be approved.
Financial Implications:
1.
Source of Funds:
Account
2004 Capital Budget 2320/6178
Telescopic Boom Excavator
-5 year debt
5-year Internal Loan
Current Funds
Proiect Code
04-2320-004-00
Amount
$255,000
$ 63,000
$ 235
$318,235
2.
Estimated Project Costing Summary
Q-41-2004 Telescopic Boom Excavator
Air-conditioning tax
Trade in credit for Unit 110
Sub Total.
G.S.T.
P.S.T.
Total Purchase Cost
G.S.T. Rebate
Net Purchase Cost
$314,562.00
$1oo.oo
($2o,ooo.oo)
$294,662.OO
$20,626.34
$23,572.96
$338,861.30)
($20,626.34)
$318,234.96
CORP0227-07/01
Report
Subject
OES 39-04 Date: December 2, 2004
Supply and Delivery of One Telescopic Boom Excavator Page 3
Q 41-2004
Purchase Cost (Under) Over Approved Funds $63,235
Note, the overexpenditure is understated due to the GST 3% rebate savings that was
already captured in the 2004 Current Budget.
The Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer has reviewed the budgetary implications
and has provided the recommendations for the financing of the expenditures contained
in this report. This overexpenditure is due to increasing costs for such specialized
equipment and the fact that the City has not acquired such equipment for several years
resulting in the use of an obsolete estimate for budget purposes.
Background
The hydroscopic boom excavator is one of the most versatile and integral pieces of
equipment within the Municipal Operation's fleet. As one of the City's largest unit, it is
used for rural road maintenance (ditching and culvert replacements/installations),
sidewalk removals, excavating, catch basin repairs, playground replacement and many
other key operating functions. In 2004, one of the City's two 460 Badgers, unit 110,
was identified for replacement. The replacement of this important unit required a
detailed and comprehensive process to ensure the City of Pickering acquired the right
piece of equipment at a market competitive price.
The process began with Fleet Operations, in conjunction with Supply & Services
initiating a technical review of equipment related to need. Two vendors, Strongco
Equipment and Amaco Construction Equipment Company, provided technical
information, which included load and safety specifications for a Badger Model 460 and
a Gradall Model 4100 respectively. From there, equipped with a prepared set standard
criteria developed for evaluation purposes, key staff attended an operations
demonstration. This demonstration afforded City of Pickering staff an opportunity to test
and evaluate the equipment's capabilities using the pre-determined criteria. Some of
the tests included placing the equipment in situations that reflect "real-life" scenarios.
Lifting, digging, grading and maneuvering operations were trialed and evaluated in
order to assess performance. In addition, other "like" organizations (private and public)
were consulted about their experiences with the equipment in order to add yet another
level of information, to best assess the equipment and put the municipality in a better
position to make an informed decision. After each case and after every session, a
findings brief was prepared for the file.
Once the initial assessment was completed and a determination was made of the most
suitable specifications, Quotation Q-41-2004 was developed and released by the
Corporation to the two vendors that participated in the initial examination. The result of
this extensive process was that the preferred excavator and vendor, based on price,
CORP0227-07/01
Report OES 39-04 Date: December 2, 2004
Subject Supply and Delivery of One Telescopic Boom Excavator Page 4
Q 41-2004
59
was a Badger Model 460 distributed by Strongco Equipment. At $294,662.00 excluding
applicable taxes, it represents the best value for the Corporation.
The total net cost of approximately $318,235 is $63,235 over the amount provided for in
the 2004 budget which will be financed through a combination of internal loans and
currents funds.
Attachments:
1. Memo from Supply & Services dated October 19, 2004
Prepared By:
-'Giant Smith
Supervet, Fleet~~-~'~//l ~i~' Operations
Vera Felge/~acher
Manager, Supply & Services
~d(Acting) Chief Administ ElraYti:v~Officer
Ric/~a~rd W. H~O'orn, P. Eng.
~'vision Head
{Municipal Property & Engineering
RH/vn
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
R.ecom. men .d. ed..~or-f~o nsi~t,o n of
CORP0227-07/01
Gillis A. Paterson
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
8O
CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
c;¢-T 1 2004
CITY OF PiCKERING
MUNICIPAL PROPERTY & ENGINEERING
October 19, 2004
To: Richard Holborn
Division Head, Municipal Property & Engineering
From: Bob Kuzma
Purchasing Analyst
Subject: Q-41-2004- Hydroscopic Excavator
Closing:
Friday, October 15, 2004, 12:00 Noon
During and subsequent to Quotation No. Q-27-2004, Supply & Services and
Fleet Operations conducted equipment demonstrations on
telescopic/hydraulic boom excavators. Upon review of the equipment
performance and capabilities, two manufacturer brands, Gradall Model 4100
II and Badger Model 460 were deemed capable of providing an excavator
for the City's requirements.
Due to the identification of a specific manufacturer model and the inclusion
for an optional provision to trade in the existing excavator in an effort to
reduce the capital cost, Quotation No. Q-41-2004 was developed and
released based on the revised specifications. In conformance to the
Ontario/Quebec Trade Agreement, an advertisement was placed on the
City's website to ensure competition was maintained.
Quotations were invited from two manufacturer distributors, Strongco
Equipment and Amaco Construction Equipment Company, both have
confirmed their designated distributorship in Ontario. Bidders have
acknowledged Addendum #1 and have enclosed all information requested
including a list and prices of optional equipment and a statement regarding
after-sales support.
Copies of quotation documents are attached. Quotations shall be
irrevocable for 60 days after the official closing date and ti~e.
Please review information provided and advise if the Iow bid submitted by
Stongco Equipment is acceptable.
In accordance with Purchasing Policy Item 04.05 revised, an award
exceeding $79,626.00 is subject to Council approval.
Richard Holborn
October 19, 2004
Page 2
61
Include in your report to Council:
1. if reference information is acceptable
2. the appropriate account number(s) to which this
work is to be charged and the budget amount(s)
assigned thereto
3. Treasurer's confirmation of funding
4. related departmental approvals
5. any reason(s) why the Iow bid of Strongco
Equipment is not acceptable, and
6. related comments specific to the project.
Approved 2004 Capital Budqet
Capital Project Debt- 5 Year Debt
Code Financing Description
04-2320-004-00 $255,000.00 Hydroscopic Boom Excavator-
Replace Unit # 110
Summary
Company Equipment OPtional
Cost Trade-In G.S.T. P.S.T. Total
Offered
Strongco
Equipment $314,662.00 ($20,000.00) 20,626.34 23,572.96 $338,861.30
Amaco
Construction $325,100.00 ($3,500.00) 22,512.00 25,728.00 $369,840.00
Equipment
bk/
Attachments
Please do not disclose pricing to enquiring bidders. Bidders will be advised of
the outcome.
Subject to COuncil approval, an approved"on-~m~" ~" requisition will also be
required to proceed.
If you require further information, please feel free to contact me.
/B. Ku'Z'~rrna j'~'
6£
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6433/05
Being a By-law to dedicate Block 114, Plan
40M-1473, Pickering as public highway.
WHEREAS The Corporation of the City of Pickering is the owner of Block 114, Plan
40M-1473, Pickering and wishes to dedicate it as public highway;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering HEREBY
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
Block 114, Plan 40M-1473, Pickering is hereby dedicated as public highway
(Rosebank Road).
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17th day of January, 2005.
David Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6434,,/r9~
Being a By-law to assume the roads within Plans
40M-1472, 40M-1473 and 40M-1571 for public use
as public highways and to assume the services
within Plans 40M-1347, 40M-1472, 40M-1473 and
40M-1571 under the jurisdiction of the City of
Pickering.
WHEREAS above ground and underground services required for the development of the
above-noted Plans have been completed to the City's satisfaction; and
WHEREAS the City of Pickering has jurisdiction over the roads shown on Plans 40M-1472,
40M-1473 and 40M-1571; and
WHEREAS pursuant to the Municipal Act, S.C. 2001, c. 25, sections 30 and 31, a highway is
owned by the municipality having jurisdiction over it and a municipality may by By-law assume
highways owned by it for public use;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering HEREBY
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
The above ground services required by the Subdivision Agreements relating hereto~ or
any amendments thereto, which are to be constructed or installed in the development of
the above-noted Plans or which are located on lands that are dedicated to or owned by
the City within Plans 40M-1347, 40M-1472, 40M-1473 (save and except Block 113) and
40M-1571 (save and except Blocks 155, 160, 161, 162 and 163), or on lands lying
immediately adjacent thereto are hereby accepted and assumed for maintenance under
the jurisdiction of The Corporation of the City of Picketing
The underground services that are required to be constructed or installed in the
development of the above-noted Plans including the storm drainage system and related
appurtenances, located on lands that are dedicated to or owned by the City in Plans
40M-1347, 40M-1472, 40M-1473 (save and except Block 113) and 40M-1571 (save and
except Blocks 155, 160, 161,162 and 163), or lands lying immediately adjacent thereto,
are hereby accepted and assumed for maintenance under the jurisdiction of The
Corporation of the City of Pickering.
In sections 1 and 2, the phrase "lands that are...owned by the City" includes lands that
are subject to an easement transferred to the City, but only with respect to the specific
service or services referred to in the easement transfer document.
The following highways are hereby assumed for public use as public highways under
the jurisdiction of The Corporation of the City of Pickering:
· Amberlea Road, Boyne Court, Eramosa Crescent and Saugeen Drive, Plan
40M-1472;
· Amberlea Road, Montclair Lane, Napanee Road, Otonabee Drive, Saugeen
Drive and Sturgeon Court, Plan 40M-1473; and
· Atwood Crescent, Gallant Court, Layton Court, Callahan Street and Engel
Court, Plan 40M-1571,
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17th day of January, 2005.
David Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
6.3
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY Of PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6435/05
Being a By-law to amend By-law 1416/82 providing
for the regulation and licensing of places of
amusement.
WHEREAS pursuant to the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c. 25, section 150(1), the Council of The
Corporation of the City of Pickering enacted By-law 1416/82 providing for the regulation and
licensing of places of amusement;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering HEREBY ENACTS
AS FOLLOWS:
Schedule A to By-law 1416/82, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto the
following:
(a) Amberlea Road, Boyne Court, Eramosa Crescent and Saugeen Drive, Plan
40M-1472; and
(b) Amberlea Road, Montclair Lane, Napanee Road, Otonabee Drive, Saugeen Drive
and Sturgeon Court, Plan 40M-1473; and
(c) Atwood Crescent, Gallant Court, Layton Court, Callahan Street and Engel Court, Plan
40M-1571,
all in the City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17th day of January, 2005.
David Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6436/05
Being a By-law to authorize the release and removal
of the Subdivision Agreement respecting Plan
40M-1347, Pickering, from title.
WHEREAS pursuant to the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. 13, s. 50, or a predecessor thereof,
The Corporation of the City of Pickering and Bramalea Limited entered into a Subdivision
Agreement dated March 4, 1985, Notice of which was registered as Instrument No. LT231960,
respecting the development of Plan 40M-1347, Pickering; and
WHEREAS the terms and conditions of the Subdivision Agreement has been complied with to
the satisfaction of the City;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering HEREBY
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
The Mayor and Clerk hereby authorize the release and removal of the Subdivision
Agreement from title dated Mamh 4, 1985, Notice of which was registered as Instrument
No. LT231960 between Bramalea Limited and The Corporation of the City of Pickering,
respecting the development of Plan 40M-1347, Pickering.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17th day of January, 2005.
David Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6437./,05
Being a By-law to authorize the release and removal
of the Subdivision Agreement respecting Plan
40M-1472, Pickering, from title.
WHEREAS pursuant to the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. 13, s. 50, or a predecessor thereof,
The Corporation of the City of Pickering and Bramalea Limited entered into a Subdivision
Agreement dated February 2, 1987, Notice of which was registered as Instrument No.
LT335602, respecting the development of Plan 40M-1472, Pickering; and
WHEREAS the terms and conditions of the Subdivision Agreement has been complied with to
the satisfaction of the City;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering HEREBY
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
The Mayor and Clerk hereby authorize the release and removal of the Subdivision
Agreement from title dated February 2, 1987, Notice of which was registered as
Instrument No. LT335602 between Bramalea Limited and The Corporation of the City of
Pickering, respecting the development of Plan 40M-1472, Pickering.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17th day of January, 2005.
David Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6438/05
Being a By-law to authorize the release and removal
from title of the Agreements relating to the
development of Plan 40M-1473, Pickering and those
parts of Lot 30, Concession 1, Pickering, being
Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8, Plan 40R-11443.
WHEREAS pursuant to the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. 13, s. 50, or a predecessor thereof,
The Corporation of the City of Pickering and Bramalea Limited entered into a Subdivision
Agreement dated February 2, 1987, Notice of which was registered as Instrument No.
LT335613, respecting the development of Plan 40M-1473, Pickering; and
WHEREAS on August 2, 1988 the City of Pickering and Bramalea Limited entered into a
secondary Subdivision Agreement to deal with the development of Blocks 106 and 107 within
Plan 40M-1473, in conjunction with those parts of Lot 30, Concession 1, Pickering, designated
as Parts 1, 2, 3, and 8, Plan 40R-11443. That Agreement was registered as Instrument Nos.
LT427556 and D300976; and
WHEREAS on August 2, 1988, Subdivision Agreement registered as Instrument No. LT335613
was amended to deal with the development of Blocks 111 and 112, Plan 40M-1473 in
conjunction with those parts of Lot 30, Concession 1, Pickering, designated as Parts 4 and 5,
Plan 40R-11443. That Agreement was registered as Instrument Nos. LT427565 and
D300977; and
WHEREAS on June 25, 1990, Subdivision Agreement registered as Instrument No. LT335613
was further amended to remove Block 113 from it and provide for the development of Block
113 with Plan 40M-1651. That Agreement was registered as Instrument LT516066; and
WHEREAS the terms and conditions of the original and secondary Subdivision Agreement and
the amendments thereto have been complied with to the satisfaction of the City;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering HEREBY
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
The Mayor and Clerk hereby authorize the release and removal of:
(a) Subdivision Agreement, Notice of which was registered as Instrument No. LT335613;
(b) Subdivision Agreement, Notice of which was registered as Instrument Nos. LT427556
and D300976;
(c)
Amending Subdivision Agreement, Notice of which was registered as Instrument No. as
Instrument Nos. LT427565 and D300977; and
(d) Amending Subdivision Agreement, Notice of which was registered as Instrument
LT516066,
each between The Corporation of the City of Pickering and Bramalea Limited, respecting the
development of Plan 40M-1473 and adjacent lands.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17th day of January, 2005.
David Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6439/05
Being a By-law to authorize the release and removal
of the Subdivision Agreement respecting Plan
40M-1571, Pickering, from title.
WHEREAS pursuant to the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. 13, s. 50, or a predecessor thereof,
The Corporation of the City of Pickering and Bramalea Limited entered into a Subdivision
Agreement dated April 18, 1988, Notice of which was registered as Instrument No. LT426682,
respecting the development of Plan 40M-1571, Pickering; and
WHEREAS the terms and conditions of the Subdivision Agreement has been complied with to
the satisfaction of the City;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering HEREBY
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
The Mayor and Clerk hereby authorize the release and removal of the Subdivision
Agreement from title dated April 18, 1988, Notice of which was registered as Instrument
No. LT426682 between Bramalea Limited and The Corporation of the City of Pickering,
respecting the development of Plan 40M-1571 Pickering.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally 3assed this 17th day of January, 2005.
David Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6M.0/05
Being a By-law to dedicate Block 139, Plan
40M-1418, Pickering as public highway.
WHEREAS The Corporation of the City of Pickering is the owner of Block 139, Plan
40M-1418, Pickering and wishes to dedicate it as public highway;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering HEREBY
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
Block 139, Plan 40M-1418, Pickering is hereby dedicated as public highway (Rosebank
Road).
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17th day of January, 2005.
David Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6441/05
Being a By-law to dedicate Block 88, Plan 40M-1419,
Pickering as public highway.
WHEREAS The Corporation of the City of Pickering is the owner of Block 88, Plan 40M-1419,
Pickering and wishes to dedicate it as public highway;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering HEREBY
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
Block 88, Plan 40M-1419, Pickering is hereby dedicated as public highway (Rosebank
Road).
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17th day of January, 2005.
David Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6442/05
Being a By-law to assume the roads as public
highways and the services within Plan 40M-1254
(save and except Blocks 20 to 27, inclusive), Plan
40M-1418 (save and except Blocks 137, 138 and
141) and Plan 40M-1419 (save and except Blocks
86 and 89), under the jurisdiction of the City of
Pickering.
WHEREAS above ground and underground services required for the development of the
above-noted Plans have been completed to the City's satisfaction; and
WHEREAS the City of Pickering has jurisdiction over the roads shown on Plans 40M-1254,
40M-1418 and 40M-1419; and
WHEREAS pursuant to the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c. 25, sections 30 and 31, a highWay is
owned by the municipality having jurisdiction over it and a municipality may by By-law assume
highways owned by it for public use;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering HEREBY
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
The above ground services required by the Subdivision Agreements relating hereto, or
any amendments thereto, which are to be constructed or installed in the development of
the above-noted Plans or which are located on lands that are dedicated to or owned by
the City within Plan 40M-1254 (save and except Blocks 20 to 27, inclusive), Plan
40M-1418 (save and except Blocks 137, 138 and 141), and Plan 40M-1419 (save and
except Blocks 86 and 89), or on lands lying immediately adjacent thereto are hereby
accepted and assumed for maintenance under the jurisdiction of The Corporation of the
City of Pickering
The underground services that are required to be constructed or installed in the
development of the above-noted Plans including the storm drainage system and related
appurtenances, located on lands that are dedicated to or owned by the City in Plan
40M-1254 (save and except Blocks 20 to 27, inclusive), Plan 40M-1418 (save and
except Blocks 137, 138 and 141) and Plan 40M-1419 (save and except Blocks 86 and
89), or lands lying immediately adjacent thereto, are hereby accepted and assumed for
maintenance under the jurisdiction of The Corporation of the City of Pickering.
In sections 1 and 2, the phrase "lands that are...owned by the City" includes lands that
are subject to an easement transferred to the City, but only with respect to the specific
service or services referred to in the easement transfer document.
The following highways are hereby assumed for public use as public highways under
the jurisdiction of The Corporation of the City of Pickering:
· Alder Court, Foxwood Trail, Norfolk Square, Strouds Lane and Sultana Square, Plan
40M-1254
· Broadoak Crescent, Fernam Street, Post Drive and Strouds Lane, Plan 40M-1418
· Ashfield Court, Charnwood Court, Dencourt Drive and Fernam Street, Plan
40M-1419
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17th day of January, 2005.
David Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6z~3/05
Being a By-law to amend By-law 1416/82 providing
for the regulation and licensing of places of
amusement.
WHEREAS pursuant to the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c. 25, section 150(1), the Council of The
Corporation of the City of Pickering enacted By-law 1416182 providing for the regulation and
licensing of places of amusement;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering HEREBY ENACTS
AS FOLLOWS:
1. Schedule A to By-law 1416/82, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto the
following:
(a)
(b)
(c)
Alder Court, Foxwood Trail, Norfolk Square, Strouds Lane and Sultana Square, Plan
40M-1254;
Broadoak Crescent, Fernam Street, Post Drive and Strouds Lane, Plan 40M-1418;
and
Ashfield Court, Charnwood Court, Dencourt Drive and Femam Street, Plan 40M-1419,
all in the City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17th day of January, 2005.
David Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6444/05
Being a By-law to authorize the release and removal
of the Agreements relating to Plan 40M-1254,
Pickering, from title.
WHEREAS pursuant to the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. 13, s. 50, or a predecessor thereof,
The Corporation of the City of Pickering and Bramalea Limited entered into a Subdivision
Agreement dated September 13, 1982, respecting the development of Plan 40M-1254, Notice
of which was registered as Instrument No. LT158923; and
WHEREAS that Subdivision Agreement was amended by a Development Agreement dealing
with the development of Block 7, Plan 40M-1254, between The Corporation of the City of
Pickering and Marshall Homes Corporation on September 22, 1998, Notice of which was
registered as Instrument No. LT872184; and
WHEREAS the terms and conditions of the Subdivision Agreement and Development
Agreement have been complied with to the satisfaction of the City;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering HEREBY
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
The Mayor and Clerk hereby authorize the release and removal of the Subdivision
Agreement from title dated September 13, 1982, Notice of which was registered as
Instrument No. LT158923 between Bramalea Limited and The Corporation of the City of
Pickering, respecting the development of Plan 40M-1254, Pickering; and
The Mayor and Clerk hereby authorize the release and removal of the Development
Agreement from title dated September 22, 1998, Notice of which was registered as
Instrument No. LT872184, between Marshall Homes Corporation and The Corporation
of the City of Picketing respecting the development of Block 7, Plan 40M-1254,
Pickering.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17th day of January, 2005.
David Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6445/05
Being a By-law to authorize the release and removal
of the Subdivision Agreement from the Lots and
Blocks within Plan 40M-1418, Pickering, from title
(save and except from Blocks 137 and 138).
WHEREAS pursuant to the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. 13, s. 50, or a predecessor thereof,
The Corporation of the City of Pickering and Bramalea Limited entered into a Subdivision
Agreement relating to the development of Plan 40M-1418, dated September 13, 1982, Notice
of which was registered as Instrument No. LT158923; and
WHEREAS that Subdivision Agreement was amended on November 19, 1990, Notice of which
was registered as Instrument No. LT529742; and
WHEREAS the terms and conditions of the Subdivision Agreement and the amendment
thereto have been complied with to the satisfaction of the City;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering HEREBY
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Mayor and Clerk hereby authorize the release and removal from title of:
(a)
the Subdivision Agreement dated September 13, 1982, Notice of which was
registered as Instrument No. LT158923 (save and except from Blocks 137 and
138); and
(b)
the amending Subdivision Agreement dated November 19, 1990, Notice of which
was registered as Instrument No. LT529742,
between Bramalea Limited and The Corporation of the City of Pickering, respecting the
development of Plan 40M-1418, Pickering.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17th day of January, 2005.
David Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6446/05
Being a By-law to authorize the release and removal
of the Subdivision Agreement from the Lots and
Blocks within Plan 40M-1419, Pickering, from title
(save and except from Block 86).
WHEREAS pursuant to the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. 13, s. 50, or a predecessor thereof,
The Corporation of the City of Pickering and Bramalea Limited entered into a Subdivision
Agreement dated September 13, 1982, Notice of which was registered as Instrument No.
LT158923, respecting the development of Plan 40M-1419, Pickering; and
WHEREAS the terms and conditions of the Subdivision Agreement have been complied with to
the satisfaction of the City;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering HEREBY
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
The Mayor and Clerk hereby authorize the release and removal of the Subdivision
Agreement from title as it relates to Lots 1 to 85 and Blocks 87, 88 and 90, dated
September 13, 1982, Notice of which was registered as Instrument No. LT158923
between Bramalea Limited and The Corporation of the City of Pickering, respecting the
development of Plan 40M-1419, Pickering.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17th day of January, 2005.
David Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
December 20, 2004
To: Bruce Taylor
City Clerk
From:
Subject:
Denise Bye
Coordinator, Property & Development Services
Request for Road Dedication By-Law
Those parts of Lots 15 and 17, Registrar's Compiled Plan No.
1051, Pickering, designated as Parts 1 and 2, Plan 40R-10267
File: Roadded.445
The above-noted lands were conveyed to the City in order to control the
development of the adjacent lands.
As the adjacent lands have now been developed and the road lying between the
two reserves has been constructed to standards satisfactory to permit public
access, a By-law should be enacted to dedicate them as public highway.
Attached hereto is a location map and By-law for the consideration of City
Council at its meeting scheduled for January 17, 2005.
DB:bg
Attachments
Copy:
Denise Bye !
Director, Planning & Development
Division Head, Municipal Property & Engineering
Supervisor, Development Control
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6447/05
Being a By-law to dedicate those parts of Lots 15 and
17, Registrar's Compiled Plan No. 1051, Pickering,
designated as Parts 1 and 2, Plan 40R-10267 as
public highway (Heathside Crescent).
WHEREAS The Corporation of the City of Pickering is the owner of those parts of Lots 15 and
17, Registrar's Compiled Plan No. 1051, Pickering, designated as Parts 1 and 2, Plan
40R-10267 and wishes to dedicate them as public highway.
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering HEREBY
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
Those parts of Lots 15 and 17, Registrar's Compiled Plan No. 1051, Pickering,
designated as Parts 1 and 2, Plan 40R-10267 are hereby dedicated as public highway
(Heathside Crescent).
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17th day of January, 2005.
David Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
Roadded, 445
77
?8
~ I If I---~ ::::;u ..--"% SQUARE <
~ ,,, r.,- ~ ~ :>
PART 1 _ o~ I ~-- ~~.--~'HONE~D
:~ART 2 -. ~ l~-
o ~ ~ fill-
o, ~ ~ ~, ~k>ZkL_..._:-
I ,,<:, wz --___~ ROWNTREE
;CENT ~,,~& B IECT -- o . ~---
o II ~- ~?'/'/7'TTr~
'< I I ' -r -- /J / J L_,--
I ~ I'"' I z°---~-.~- ----"=~ "..,
\ ~_ ~ -----,,, ~r--..~ '-.LLW_ ~ J_ ~ .....
IIIIII %,'~-I
o L
City of Pickering Planning & Development Department
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PT. LOTS. 15 & 17, R.O.P. NO 10,51, DES. AS PTS 1 & 2, PLAN 40R-10267
OWNER CITY OF PICKERING DATE OCT. 5, 2004 DRAWN BY ,.lB
FILE No. ROADBED. 445 SCALE 1:5000 CHECKED BY DB
FOR DEPARTMENT use ONLY PN-12 PA-
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO,. 6448/05.
Being a By-law to amend By-law 2359/87
providing for the regulating of parking,
standing and stopping on highways or parts
of highways under the jurisdiction of the City
of Pickering and on private and municipal
property.
WHEREAS, By-law 2359/87, as amended, provides for the regulating of parking,
standing and stopping on highways or parts of'highways under the jurisdiction of the
City of Pickering and on private and municipal property; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend By-law 2359/87 to establish "no parking"
zones along Begley Street and Tanzer Court;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. Schedule B to By-Law 2359/87, as amended, is hereby further amended thereto
by the following:
Hi,qhway Side Between / And Prohibited times
and days
ADD
Begley. Street
East Bayly Street to See Note 1
Tanzer Court
Tanzer Court North Bayly Street to See Note 1
Wayfarer Lane
Tanzer Court South Begley Street to See Note 1
Albacore Manor
This By-Law shall come into fome on the date that it is approved by the Council
of The City of Pickering and when signs to the effect are erected.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17 day of January
2005.
David Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, City Clerk
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6449/05
Being a By-law to amend By-taw 2359/87
providing for the regulating cf parking,
standing and stopping on highways or parts
of highways under the jurisdiction of the City
of Pickering and on private and municipal
property.
WHEREAS, By-law 2359/87, as amended, provides for the regulating of parking,
standing and stopping on highways or parts of highways under the jurisdiction of the
City of Pickering and on private and municipal property; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend By-law 2359/87 to establish "no stopping"
zones along a section of Glengrove Road.
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
Schedule A to By-Law 2359/87, as amended, is hereby further amended by
adding the following item:
Highway Side Between/And Prohibited times
and days
Glengrove Road South
Glenview Road and
130 m west of
Glenview Road.
7:30 am to 9:00 am
and from 3:00 pm
to 4:30 pm
Monday to Friday.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17 th day of January
Dave Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, City Clerk
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6,~50/05
Being a by-law to amend by-law 2632~88 to
provide for erecting of Stop signs at certain
intersections within the City of Pickering
WHEREAS, Pursuant to section 27(1) of the Municipal Act 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25 as
amended, the council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering may by by-law provide
for the erection of stop signs at the intersections on highways under its jurisdiction.
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
Stop signs shall be erected at the intersection of highways set out in Column I of
Schedule A attached hereto, facing the traffic bound in the directions set out in
Column II of the Schedule.
Schedule A to By-law 2632/88, as amended, is hereby further amended by
adding hereto the following items:
Column I Column II
Intersections Facinq Traffic
Clements Road and Copperstone Drive Southbound on Copperstone Drive
, BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17 th day of January,
2005.
Dave Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, City Clerk
81
82
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6451/05
Being a by-law for the collection of taxes and to establish the
installment due dates for the Interim Levy 2005.
WHEREAS Section 317, of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O.2001, c.25, as amended,
provides that the council of a local municipality may, before the adoption of the
estimates for the year, pass a By-law levying amounts on the assessment of property,
in the local municipality ratable for local municipality purposes; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering deems it appropriate
to provide for such an interim levy on the assessment of property in this municipality.
NOW THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF
PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. The amounts levied shall be as follows:
a. For the residential, pipeline, farmland and managed forest property classes
there shall be imposed and collected an interim levy of:
If no percentage is prescribed, 50% of the total taxes for municipal
and school purposes levied in the year 2004.
o
b. For the multi-residential, commercial and industrial property classes there
shall be imposed and collected an interim' levy of:
If no percentage is prescribed, 50% of the total taxes for municipal
and school purposes levied in the year 2004.
For the payment-in-lieu property classes, there shall be imposed and
collected an interim levy of:
If no percentage is prescribed, 50% of the total taxes for municipal
and where applicable for school purposes, in the year 2004.
For the purposes of calculating the total amount of taxes for the year 2005 under
paragraph one, if any taxes for municipal and school purposes were levied on a
property for only part of 2004 because assessment was added to the collector's
roll during 2004, an amount shall be added equal to the additional taxes that
would have been levied on the property if taxes for municipal and school
purposes had been levied for the entire year.
The provision of this By-law apply in the event that assessment is added for the
year 2005 to the collector's roll after the date this By-law is passed and an
interim levy shall be imposed and collected.
Taxes shall be payable to the Treasurer, City of Pickering.
When not in default, the payment of taxes, or any installment thereof, may also
be made at any financial institution permitted by Section 346 of the Municipal
Act, 2001, S.O. 2001 c. 25, as amended.
The Treasurer may mail, or cause to be mailed, all notices of taxes required in
accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O.c. 25, as
amended, to the address of the residence or place of business or to the
premises in respect of which the taxes are payable unless the taxpayer directs
the treasurer in writing to send the bill to another address, in which case it shall
be sent to that address. Notices will not be mailed to tenants. It is the
responsibility of the person taxed to notify and collect taxes from tenants or other
persons.
10.
11.
12.
13.
The Treasurer is hereby authorized to accept part payment from time to time on
account of any taxes due, in accordance with the provisions of subsection 347
(1) and (2) of the Municipal Act 2001, S.C.c.25 as amended, and to give a
receipt for such part payment under Section 346 (1) of the Municipal Act 2001,
S.C.c.25, as amended.
The Treasurer is hereby authorized to prepare and give one separate tax notice
for the collection of 2005 taxes, one notice being an INTERIM notice, with two
installments under the provisions of Section 342 of the Municipal Act 2001,
S.C. 2001, c.25 as amended, as follows:
INTERIM Tax Notice
Due date of the first installment February 25, 2005
Due date of the second installment April 28, 2005;
adjusted by the Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer.
or either date
Except in the case of taxes payable in respect of assessments made under
Sections 33 and 34 of the Assessment Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. A31, as amended,
the late payment charge of one and one-quarter percent for non-payment of
taxes and monies payable as taxes shall be added as a penalty to every tax or
assessment, rent or rate of any installment or part thereof remaining unpaid on
the first day of default and on the first day of each calendar month thereafter in
which such default continues pursuant to subsections 345 (1), (2) and (3) of
the Municipal Act 2001, S.C.c.25 as amended. The Treasurer shall collect by
distress or otherwise under the provisions of the applicable statutes all such
taxes, assessments, rents, rates or installments or parts thereof as shall not
have been paid on or before the several dates named as aforesaid, together with
the said percentage charges as they are incurred pursuant to sections 349,
350 and 351 of the Municipal Act 2001, S.C.c.25 as amended.
In the case of taxes payable in respect of assessments made under Sections 33
and 34 of the Assessment Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.A.31, as amended, the late
payment charge of one and. one-quarter percent for non payment of taxes and
monies payable as taxes shall be added as a penalty to every tax so payable
remaining unpaid on the first day after twenty-one days from the date of mailing
by the Treasurer of a demand for payment thereof and on the first day of each
calendar month thereafter in which default continues pursuant to subsections
345 (1), (2) and (3) of the Municipal Act 2001, S.C.c.25 as amended. It shall be
the duty of the Treasurer immediately after the expiration of the said twenty-one
days to collect at once by distress or otherwise under the provisions of the
applicable statutes, all such taxes as shall not have been paid on or before the
expiration of the said twenty-one day period, together with the said percentage
charges as they are incurred pursuant to sections 349, 350 and 351 of the
Municipal Act 2001, S.C.c.25 as amended.
Nothing herein contained shall prevent the Treasurer from proceeding at any
time with the collection of any rate, tax or assessment, or any part thereof, in
accordance with the provisions of the statutes and By-laws governing the
collection of taxes.
Where tenants of land owned by the Crown or in which the Crown has an
interest are liable for the payment of taxes and where any such tenant has been
employed either within or outside the municipality by the same employer for not
less than thirty days, such employer shall pay over to the Treasurer on demand
out of any wages, salary or other remuneration due to such employee, the
amount then payable for taxes under this By-law and such payment shall relieve
the employer from any liability to the employee for the amount so paid.
If any section or portion of this By-law is found by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, it is the intent of Council for the Corporation of the City
of Pickering that all remaining sections and portions of this By-law continue in
force and effect.
14. That this By-law is to come into effect on the 1st day of January, 2005.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17th day of
January, 2005.
David Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
RESOLUTION OF COUNCIL
DATE
MOVED BY
SECONDED BY
1. That Report CS 04-05 regarding Council compensation, be received; and
2. That the draft by-law to adopt various amendments respecting Council
compensation and benefits, be enacted; and
3. That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take
the necessary actions to give effect thereto.
REPORT TO
COUNCIL
Report Number: CS 04-05
Date: January 6, 2005
From:
Bruce Taylor, AMCT, CMM
City Clerk
Subject: Council Compensation
Recommendation:
1. That Report CS 04-05 regarding Council compensation be received.
2. That the draft by-law to adopt various amendments respecting Council
compensation and benefits be enacted.
That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take the
necessary actions to give effect thereto.
Executive Summary:
To implement various adjustments respecting Council compensation and benefits.
Financial Implications: See Background
Background:
Please find attached to this Report a draft by-law to implement various adjustments
respecting Council compensation and benefits. The only changes that have been made
respecting Council compensation and benefits are as follows:
The salary of the Mayor will increase from $60,000 to $63,654 effective January
1, 2005 to reflect the same increases given to both Union and Non-Union staff
within the past year.
· The salary of the Councillors will increase from $25,000 to $26,523 effective
January 1, 2005, again to reflect the same increases given to all staff within the
past year.
· Per diem payments will be made monthly.
Report CS 04-05
Council Compensation
January 6, 2005
Page 2
The daily allowance for expenses incurred at conventions has increased from
$50 to $60 per day.
For Members who have completed 15 years of continuous service and cease to
be a Member, extended health, dental and vision benefits will continue until the
Member attains age 70, previous this was age 65. The cost of this extension is
$564 annually for each Member that would be eligible for this benefit.
The attached draft by-law also continues to deem one-third of Council's remuneration
as expenses.
It is important to note that Members of Council have not received an increase in their
salary since 2001. The increase provided for in the attached draft by-law reflect the
same increases provided to all City staff of 3% in 2004 and 3% in 2005.
Attachments:
1. Draft by-law
Prepared~/- ,~?
Bruce Taylor
City Clerk
Attachment
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
(Acting) Chief Administrative Officer
CORP0227-07/01
88
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
BY-LAW NO. 6452/0 4
Being a by-law respecting Council salaries,
benefits, allowances and communications.
WHEREAS the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended, allows for the
payment of remuneration and expenses to Members of Council and local boards,
including the option to provide that one-third of the taxable remuneration and expenses
be deemed as expenses incident to the discharge of their duties for income tax
purposes;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF
PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 2 of By-law Number 5999102 is hereby deleted and the following is
substituted therefore:
(a)
(b)
The remuneration payable to the Mayor shall be $63,654.00.
Commencing on January 1, 2006 and on every January 1st
thereafter, the annual salary of the Mayor shall be increased at the
same rate/percentage provided to those employees covered by the
Collective Agreement for CUPE Local 129 on Apdl 1st of the
immediate preceding year.
Section 3 of By-law Number 599g/02 is hereby deleted and the following i's
substituted therefore:
d
(a)
(b)
The remuneration payable to a Councillor shall be $26,523.
Commencing on January 1, 2006 and on every January 1st
thereafter, the annual salary of a Councillor shall be increased at
the same rate/percentage provided to those employees covered by
the Collective Agreement for CUPE Local 129 on April 1st of the
immediate preceding year
Section 4 of By-law 5999/02 is hereby deleted and the following is substituted
therefore:
4. (a)
A Councillor shall be paid a per diem rate of 1.0% of their annual
salary for a total of ten days for attending a full day meeting,
workshop, seminar or convention.
(b)
Per diem payments payable to Councillors shall be paid monthly.
Per diem payments shall cease on the last day that the Councillors
remains in office and shall be pro-rated accordingly.
The daily allowance for expenses incurred at conventions shall be $60.00 per
day.
ATTACHHENT# /,,, TOBEPOB,T# ~'~' c:":'"- cs"--
Section 7(a) of By-law Number 5999/02 is hereby deleted and the following is
substituted therefore:
7. (a)
For Members who have completed fifteen years of continuous
service and cease to be a Member for the reasons set out in
Section 6(a)(I to v), the Corporation shall pay 100% of the premium
cost of the Extended Health, Dental and Vision Care Benefit Plans
until the Member attains age 70.
That one-third of the remuneration paid to Members of Council and local boards
of the municipality is deemed as expenses incident to the discharge of their
duties as Members of Council or the local board.
7. This by-law shall take effect on January 1, 2005.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 17th day of January,
2005.
David Ryan, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
NOTICE OF MOTION
DATE: JANUARY 17, 2005
MOVED BY: COUNCILLOR DICKERSON
SECONDED BY: COUNCILLOR JOHNSON
WHEREAS the City of Pickering depends on the contribution of many volunteers to
ensure quality of life for all its citizens; and
WHEREAS the Government of Canada recognizes veterans as all former members of
the Canadian Forces who meet the military's professional occupation requirements and
have been released with an honourable discharge. This definition includes reserves,
those who have served on domestic duty and those who have served in "Special Duty
Area" (e.g. peacekeeping assignments; and
WHEREAS the City of Pickering salutes its veterans, both living and deceased, each
November 11th in a Remembrance Day Ceremony; and
WHERREAS the City of Pickering ought to have a policy of naming streets in memory
and in honour of war veterans; and
WHEREAS those honoured through the street naming process should be those men
and women who voluntarily enlisted with Canada's military forces and served overseas
in active duty during the Boer War, Wodd War 1, World War 2, the Korean conflict and
the Crimean War and those who lost their lives in any peacekeeping action initiated by
the United Nations or NATO in which Canadian forces played an active military role
(e.g. Afghanistan); and
WHEREAS the war veterans to be recognized in this program would be those who were
residents of Pickering at the time of their enlistment;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the policy of naming streets in memory
and in honour of was veterans be instituted as a public acknowledgement of Pickering's
truly "Ultimate Volunteers" based on the following cdteria wherever possible:
a)
b)
c)
Killed or missing in action be honoured first,
Veterans who have passed away;
Veterans still living be so honoured next.
FURTHER THAT all streets named in honour of veterans be identified with street signs
displaying a poppy; and
FURTHER THAT Royal Canadian Legion Branches 606 Pickering and 483 Claremont
be invited to assist with research of veteran's names.
CARRIED:
Btaylor:Notices of Motion:Street Names re Veterans
MAYOR
9£
Cit o4
NOTICE OF MOTION
DATE: JANUARY 17, 2005
MOVED BY: COUNCILLOR MCLEAN
SECONDED BY: COUNCILLOR DICKERSON
WHEREAS various businesses have been using seamh lights as an advertising method to
attract customers; and
WHEREAS seamh lights tend to cause a nuisance to residents that live close to such
seamh lights; and
WHEREAS other forms of advertising through illuminated pylon signs, billboard signs and
wall signs are strictly regulated through the City's Sign By-law;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby directs
staff to prepare a by-law that will restrict the use of search lights in a manner that they will
not cause a nuisance to residents or local businesses.
CARRIED:
Btaylor:Notices of Motion:Search Lights
MAYOR
95
NOTICE OF MOTION
DATE: JANUARY 17, 2005
MOVED BY: COUNCILLORASHE
SECONDED BY: COUNCILLOR MCLEAN
Whereas many volunteer Fire Departments in Ontario are strengthened by the service
of "Double Hatters" fire fighters who work as professional, full-time fighters and also
serve as volunteer fire fighters on their free time and in their home communities; and
Whereas the Ontado Professional Fire Fighters Association has declared their intent to
"phase out" these "Double Hatters" firefighters; and
Whereas "Double Hatters" are being threatened by the union leadership and forced to
resign as volunteer fire fighters or face losing their full-time jobs and this is weakening
volunteer fire departments in Ontario; and
Whereas a Private Members Bill (Bill 52), being the Volunteer Fire Fighters Employment
Protection Act, has been introduced that would uphold the right to volunteer and solve
this problem concerning public safety in Ontario; and
Whereas over 100 Ontario municipalities have passed resolutions in support of "Double
Hatters", and
Whereas Association of Municipalities of Ontado President Roger Anderson stated in
his inaugural address AMO's commitment to "fight the rights of double hatters fire
fighters to exercise free choice in their free time";
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Pickering urge the Government
of Ontario to express public support of Bill 52 and a willingness to pass it into law or
introduce similar legislation that protects the rights of fire fighters to volunteer in their
home communities on their free time, and
FURTHER THAT a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the following:
· Premier of Ontario
· Minister of Public Safety
· WayneArthurs MPP
· Leader of the Official Opposition
· Leader of the NDP Party
· AMO
· Durham Municipalities
CARRIED:
Btaylor:Notices of Motion:Bill 52 Volunteer Fire Fighters
MAYOR