HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 5, 2001
LJ 3w:'.... b d l > tJ "AV AGENDA
COUNCIL MEETING
Anne Greentree
Supervisor, Legislative Services
MARCH 5, 2001
AGENDA
COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY, MARCH 5, 2001
(1) ADOPTION OF MINUTES
Regular Meeting of February 19, 2001
(II) PRESENTATION
1. Pat Olive, representing the Economic Developers Council of Ontario (EDCO),
will present to Councillor Johnson the President's Award for his support of
EDCO and his support of tourism and economic development over the years.
(IIII DELEGATIONS
1. The following delegations will address Council concerning the Proposed Increase
to Taxicab Fares and Decrease in Transfer Fee:
a) Bhupinder Singh Bajwa
b) Glen Campbell
c) Aruen Bissell
d) Sean Donalson
e) Surinder Kumar
0 Gurbax Singh
g) Kewal Mandcha
h) Bawider Baim
i) Sagir Ahmed
j) Arif Rana
k) Wazir Ahmed
1) Parminder Singh
m) Sanjeev Kumar
n) Jamal Ahmed
(IV) RESOLUTIONS
PAGE
1. To adopt the Executive Committee Report dated February 26, 2001. 1-3
2. To consider Planning & Development Report 08-01 - Liverpool Road South Area 4-27
Detailed Review - City-initiated Official Plan Amendment.
3. To consider Clerks Report 04-01 - Proposed Increase to Taxicab Fares and Decrease 28-36
in Transfer Fee.
This Item was Deferred from the February 12th Executive Committee Meeting
4. To consider Clerks Report 10-01 - Appointments to Pickering Youth Partnership 37-43
Initiative.
--2--
M BY-LAWS
By-law Number 5806/01 44-46
Being a by-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 3036, as amended by By-law
2920/88, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering District Planning Area,
Region of Durham in Part of Lot 21 and 22, Concession 1, in the City of Pickering.
(A30/00)
By-law Number 5807/01 47-48
Being a by-law to amend By-law Number 2206/86 for the licensing, regulating and
governing of taxicab drivers, owners and brokers.
By-law Number 5808/01 49
Being a by-law to appoint persons to the Pickering Youth Partnership Initiative.
(VI) NOTICE OF MOTION
1. Moved by Councillor Brenner 50
Seconded by Councillor Johnson
WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to establish a guideline for staff and Council
for the preparation of the 2001 Current Budget for the City of Pickering which
will have an effect on the City's portion of the property taxes;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering
hereby directs staff that, excluding Fire Services and excluding assessment
growth, the net increase to the 2001 Current Budget shall not provide an increase
to the City's portion of the property tax in excess of 3% over the Year 2000.
(VII) CONFIDENTIAL MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION
1. To consider a financial matter. 51-67
(VIII) OTHER BUSINESS
(IX) CONFIRMATION BY-LAW
(X) ADJOURNMENT
001
RESOLUTION OF COUNCIL
DATE
MOVED BY
SECONDED BY
That the Report of the Executive Committee dated February 26, 2001, be adopted.
CARRIED:
MAYOR
--2--
3. Pre-budget approval be given in the amount of $175,000 for Planning Studies
stated below and as outlined in Attachment #3:
(a) the amount of $75,000 for Planning Studies related to the Liverpool Road
South Detailed Review, and the East Duffins Area Land Use and Design
Study;
(b) the amount up to $100,000 for a Planning Review of the Northeast
Quadrant Development Guidelines, with anticipated private sector
matching funding of approximately $40,000 - $50,000 from
landowners/developers within the quadrant, with staff being direted to
seek funding from landowners/developers within the northeast quadrant
for the Planning Review of the Northeast Quadrant Development
Guidelines, and that the Review not proceed unless adequate private
sector funding is secured;
4. (a) Pre-budget approval be given for the construction of Phase II of the
Millennium Trail and Boardwalk Project for the Phase II components at a
cost not to exceed $600,000; and
(b) the Tender be awarded to Miwel as per pricing of Tender T-9-2000,
received and approved in part by Resolution #93/00, for Phase II works;
5. Financing be included in the 2001 Current and Capital Budgets; and
6. The appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to give effect
thereto.
4. CLERKS REPORT #08-01
YEAR 2001 ANIMAL CONTROL BUDGET
That the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby approves the
Year 2001 Animal Control budget estimates as recommended by the Pickering,
Ajax and Whitby Joint Animal Control Committee at its meeting of January 31,
2001.
5. PROCLAMATION
"RED CROSS MONTH" - MARCH, 2001
"DAY OF MOURNING" - APRIL 28, 2001
That Mayor Arthurs be authorized to make the following proclamation:
003
"Red Cross Month" - March, 2001
"Day of Mourning" - April 28, 2001
Citq a?
I` I
I I
I R
FROM: Neil Carroll
Director, Planning & Development
REPORT TO COUNCIL
005
DATE: February 23, 2001
REPORT NUMBER: PD 08-01
SUBJECT: Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review -
City-initiated Official Plan Amendment
and,
Pickering Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 99-004/P
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 22/99
Pickering Harbour Company
Part of Lot 23, Range 3, B.F.C.
(west side of Liverpool Road, south of Wharf Street)
City of Pickering
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That Council direct staff to commence a City-initiated Official Plan Amendment for the
entire Liverpool Road Waterfront Node, and hold an associated Statutory Public Information
Meeting on April 19, 2001, to consider potential amendments to the Pickering Official Plan
to implement the results of the Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review.
2. That Council lift from the table Pickering Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 99-
004/P and Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 22/99 (tabled by Council on June 19,
2000), submitted by Pickering Harbour Company, and refer these applications back to staff
for further review and consideration concurrently with the City-initiated Official Plan
Amendment for the entire Liverpool Road Waterfront Node (initiated through adoption of
Recommendation 1. above) and the Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review.
ORIGIN:
A request from Mayor Arthurs directing staff to prepare a report for the March 5, 2001 Council
Meeting to provide recommendations to Council regarding certain planning matters within the
Liverpool Road South Area.
AUTHORITY:
The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, chapter P.13
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
No direct costs to the City are anticipated as a result of the proposed recommendations.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The final part of the Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review is commencing, and it is
anticipated that several recommendations for active planning matters within the Liverpool Road
Waterfront Node will be forwarded to Council for consideration in June, 2001. A required
City-initiated Official Plan Amendment to establish the policy framework within the Pickering
Official Plan for guidelines being established through the Detailed Review has not yet
commenced.
PLANNING REPORT NUMBER PD 08-01 Date: February 23, 2001
Subject: Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review, and Page 3 O ??
Pickering Harbour Company Development Applications
The historic "Fairport Village", the Hydro Marsh, the Front Street Park, the East Spit and
Beachfront Park also fall within this Node (see Location Map - Attachment #1).
1.3 City-initiated Official Plan Amendment
Direction to staff to commence a City-initiated Official Plan Amendment is required from
Council to consider amendments to the Pickering Official Plan necessary to implement the
results of the Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review. Certain amendments to the
Pickering Official Plan are required to help implement the vision and objectives established
in development guidelines for the Area, and to provide a strong policy foundation for future
development within the Liverpool Road Waterfront Node.
Potential amendments to the Pickering Official Plan resulting from the Liverpool Road South
Area Detailed Review were provided to Council for discussion in Appendix V to
Report Number PD 26-00, considered by Council on June 19, 2000.
At their June 19, 2000 Meeting, Council passed Resolution #96/00 which, among other
things. directed staff to hold a Statutory Public Information Meeting following Part 2 (of the
Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review) to discuss potential amendments to the
Pickering Official Plan required to implement the recommendations of the "Liverpool Road
South Area Detailed Review: Part 1 - Phase 2 Report".
The potential amendments to the Pickering Official Plan outlined in Appendix V to Report
Number PD 26-00 were amended by Council. A copy of the text of Report Number
PD 26-00, a copy of Appendix V to that Report and a copy of Council Resolution #96/00 are
included as Attachments #2 to #4 respectively, to this Report.
1.4 Pickering Harbour Company Development Applications
Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications (OPA 99-004/P and
A 22/99), submitted by Pickering Harbour Company in July, 1999, were tabled by Council
on June 19, 2000. These applications proposed phased development consisting of
40 townhouse units (adjacent to Liverpool Road and Wharf Street) in the first phase, and a
mixed-use block (adjacent to the waterfront) including the potential development of a
marina, a 140 unit hotel/apartment complex, restaurant, retail, entertainment and offices uses,
and a public walkway in the second phase.
Planning & Development staff recommended to Council that the first phase of development
proposed was an appropriate and desirable form of development, and recommended approval
in principle of that proposed development, subject to various conditions (including the
adoption of the City-initiated Official Plan Amendment). Staff recommended that the second
phase of development proposed was premature in the absence of required information and
technical reports. Staff recommended that the second phase of the proposed development be
deferred pending Council's consideration of a City-initiated Official Plan Amendment for the
Liverpool Road Waterfront Node, that the proposal be revised to reflect the Liverpool Road
Waterfront Node Development Guidelines and that appropriate supporting information be
submitted.
1.5 Current Review
Since June, 2000, the Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review has progressed from
Part 1 (focusing mainly on land use issues within the Waterfront Node) to Part 2, involving
theme generation for the Area and consideration of resultant design guidelines for both
private development and public initiatives.
Staff is currently working with stakeholders, landowners, community groups and the Study
consultants to complete Part 2 of the Review. It is anticipated that Part 2 of the Review will
be completed in the Spring of 2001, and recommendations will be considered by Council in
June, 2001.
PLANNING REPORT NUMBER PD 08-01 Date: February 23, 2001
Subject: Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review, and Page 5 9
Pickering Harbour Company Development Applications
The Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review process is well advanced, with extensive
public consultation completed, and to be continued throughout that process. It would be
efficient and appropriate to encourage the review of related planning matters within the
Liverpool Road Waterfront Node to occur concurrently. A concurrent review approach
would be most expeditious, would avoid delays inherent to other potential options and would
avoid duplication in efforts.
Through recent stakeholder and resident workshops conducted through Part 2 of the
Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review, there was clear support from both the major
landowners within the Review Area and the representatives from the community groups, to
proceed with the staff recommended option outlined above. Through these discussions it was
concluded that considering all of the Pickering Harbour Company applications at one time in
conjunction with the related planning matters arising from the Detailed Review was most
efficient, resulting in the recommended modification to that original Option 2A.
The City-initiated Official Plan Amendment would consist of full public participation,
through both formal circulation and the required Statutory Public Information Meeting, and
would be appropriately reviewed and considered in conjunction with Part 2 of the Liverpool
Road South Area Detailed Review. Public consultation and time commitments by
stakeholders, residents and staff, although frequent in the short term, would be focused
within the next three to four months, as opposed to sporadic and beyond 2001.
Adopting the recommended concurrent review approach would allow Council to consider
multiple related recommendations for development within the Waterfront Node in an
efficient and timely manner. Although recommended to be considered in conjunction with
other planning matters at one time, the Pickering Harbour Company development
applications could still be considered in whole or in part, and all or some of the proposed
development could be implemented with other development occurring within the Waterfront
Node.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Text of Report PD 26-00
3. Appendix V to Report PD 26-00
4. Council Resolution #96/00
5. Planning & Development Department Memorandum
Prepared By:
Ron Taylor
Planner 2
Approved / Endorsed
!Z /. _/
Neil Carro , WP, P
Director, P & Development
Catherine Rose
Manager, Policy
RST/CLR/ph
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended for the consideration of Pickering
City Council
n
J. Ouin
fC( of P/cr ATTACHMENT #_..__...2__T0 0 1
& ?9y REPORT # PU _d - --
REPORT TO COUNCIL
FROM: Neil Carroll DATE: June 1, 2000
Director, Planning and Development
REPORT NUMBER: PD 26-00
SUBJECT: Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review:
Part 1 - Phase 2 Report
Liverpool Road Waterfront Node Development Guidelines
City of Pickering
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That Council receive as background information the "Liverpool Road South Area
Detailed Review - Part 1 Phase 1 Report", prepared by the Planning and Development
Department, and the consulting firms of Totten Sims Hubicki Associates, Markson
Borooah Hodgson Architects and TCI Management Consultants Limited, dated
May 12, 2000 (the document was previously distributed under separate cover);
2. That Council receive as background information the "Liverpool Road South Area
Detailed Review - Part 1 Phase 2 Report", attached as Appendix I to Report
Number PD 26-00, prepared by the Planning and Development Department, and the
consulting firms of Totten Sims Hubicki Associates, Markson Borooah Hodgson
Architects and TCI Management Consultants Limited, dated June 8, 2000;
3. That Council adopt the "Liverpool Road Waterfront Node Development Guidelines"
attached as Appendix II to Planning Report Number PD 26-00, as the City's strategy for
detailed land use, urban design, and major street layout within the Liverpool Road South
Area;
4. That Council endorse the "Liverpool Road Waterfront Node Revised Implementation
Strategy", attached as Appendix III to Report Number PD 26-00, direct City staff to
include the Implementation Strategy as an appendix to the Liverpool Road Waterfront
Node Development Guidelines, and direct City staff to review implementation matters
annually and forward appropriate projects for Council's consideration during budget
deliberations;
5. That Council adopt "Informational Revision No. 8 to the Pickering Official Plan"
attached as Appendix IV to Report Number PD 26-00;
6. That Council direct staff to hold a Statutory Public Information Meeting on
August 10, 2000, to discuss potential amendments to the Pickering Official Plan required
to implement the recommendations of the "Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review:
Part 1 - Phase 2 Report", as generally set out in Appendix V to Report Number
PD 26-00;
7. That Council direct staff to commence with the "Liverpool Road South Area Detailed
Review - Part 2", as per the Council-adopted Terms of Reference for the Liverpool Road
South Area Detailed Review; and
8. That Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of Report Number PD 26-00 to the
City's Waterfront Coordinating Committee, the Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority, and the Region of Durham.
ATTACHMENT # a TO
REPORT # PD
REPORT NUMBER PD 26-00 June 8, 2000
Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review: Part 1- Phase 2 Report Page 3013
BACKGROUND:
1.0 History
1.1 Study Area
The Liverpool Road South Study Area generally extends southward from
Commerce Street on both sides of Liverpool Road to Lake Ontario. It extends west to
include all of the properties south of Commerce Street having both access and exposure
to Frenchman's Bay, including the water lots under the Bay. The study area includes the
historic "Village of Fairport", Hydro Marsh, Front Street Park, the East Spit and
Beachfront Park. Existing development in the area includes a mixture of housing,
marinas, restaurant, boat storage, marina service, aquaculture, park, and natural open
space uses (see Location Map - Attachment #1).
1.2 Development Applications
In July 1999, the City received two major development proposals within the study area
(the location of the lands subject to these applications is also shown on Attachment #1).
The applications, submitted by the Pickering Harbour Company (OPA 99-004/P and
A 22/99), and G. & A. Hilts (now 794582 Ontario Ltd.) (A 23/99), proposed a "marine
village" concept consisting of townhomes, boat storage areas, and the potential for
marinas, marina-supportive uses, commercial uses, and higher density residential uses.
The applications were discussed at a Statutory Public Information Meeting held
August 24, 1999.
The Bay Ridges Neighbourhood Map of the Pickering Official Plan identifies the study
area as being within a "Detailed Review Area", which indicates the need to establish
comprehensive land use, urban design, transportation, and environmental management
parameters for the area prior to major development occurring. With respect to the
above-mentioned applications, there was considerable concern expressed by the City and
members of the public that such a comprehensive plan should be developed before
making any decisions on specific development applications.
Accordingly, Council passed Resolution #181/99 in September 1999, which directed staff
to prepare a terms of reference for a Detailed Review of the area. The resolution also
stated that no recommendations were to be forwarded to Council on any major
development proposals within the study area until the Detailed Review was completed.
1.3 Detailed Review
Council endorsed a terms of reference for the Liverpool Road South Area Detailed
Review in December 1999 (see Attachment #2). The Planning and Development
Department was directed to initiate the study, and funding was established to undertake
the work. Three consulting firms were retained by the City to provide professional
assistance with marina development, urban design and market analysis. The firms are
Totten Sims Hubicki Associates, Markson Borooah Hodgson Architects and
TCI Management Consultants Limited. Key personal from those firms combined with
staff of the Planning and Development Department to form a study team to undertake the
Detailed Review.
As per the terms of reference, the Detailed Review consists of two parts. Part 1 focuses
on land use, building mass and placement, and provides an appropriate context for the
review of development applications. Once Council adopts the recommendations of
Part 1, the study team will proceed with Part 2, which focuses on detailed design matters
including the establishment of a "theme" for the area, architectural guidelines, and
landscape guidelines.
ATTACHMENT P 2? TO
REPORT # PO
REPORT NUMBER PD 26-00
Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review: Part 1- Phase 2 Report
June 8, 2000
Page 5
2.0 Discussion
2.1 Public Consultation Summary
The Public Consultation Summary identifies the formal consultation sessions held during
Part 1 of the Detailed Review. Also summarized are the main issues identified during a
public meeting held May 16`h, 2000, to discuss the Part 1 - Phase 1 Report. A detailed
staff response is provided for each of the issues.
Briefly, the main issues discussed in the Public Consultation Summary are as follows:
• several people expressed concern with the potential loss of marina activity if all lands
adjacent to Frenchman's Bay were development for other purposes; staff agree and
have revised the development guidelines and drafted Official Plan policy to establish
a "Waterfront Use and Amenity Area" adjacent to the Bay, in which uses of a
primarily waterfront-related nature will be permitted;
• concerns were raised regarding the potential for new development to have a
detrimental impact on the area's natural features; staff agree that it is important to
consider these impacts; several Official Plan policies provide guidance on this matter;
• the "Pickering Ajax Citizens Together" group has taken the position that no
bay-filling be permitted; staff suggest that to prohibit bay-filling may preclude
opportunities to improve certain segments of the Frenchman's Bay shoreline; such
improvements may also be appropriate to accommodate public amenities, such as a
waterfront promenade;
• people were concerned with the prospects of increased traffic in the neighbourhood
resulting from additional development; staff point out the Liverpool Road Waterfront
Node Development Guidelines do not contemplate a "regional scale" level of
development, as the corresponding intensity of development would be inappropriate
for this area; the traffic situation will be monitored and mitigative actions taken if
necessary; and
• several people objected to the suggestion that certain existing and future roads should
accommodate on-street parking, and were concerned that there may not be enough
parking; staff point out that the parking strategies included within the Development
Guidelines, are a "package" of opportunities, suggesting both on- and off-street
parking; all will likely be required to accommodate future parking demand in this
area of limited available land; nevertheless, the parking situation will also be
monitored over time.
2.2 Revised Land Use Plan
The purpose of the detailed land use plan is to provide a basis for preparing the Liverpool
Road Waterfront Node Development Guidelines. The revised plan remains quite similar
to that appearing in the Phase 1- Part 1 Report, with one change of note.
015
The more substantial change is the addition of the "Waterfront Use and Amenity Area",
which is a corridor stretching approximately 40 metres inland from the edge of
Frenchman's Bay, running from the Front Street City Park through the Marina Mixed
Use Area to Liverpool Road. Generally, the area is reserved exclusively for marine-
related activities, including marinas, yacht clubs, marina-supportive facilities, mooring
facilities, the waterfront promenade and other public activity areas such as parks, public
piers and public squares. At Council's discretion, additional uses such as residential,
commercial, retail, and office uses, could be considered within the 40 metres, provided
that detailed development proposals make appropriate accommodations for marine-
related activities and/or public activity areas (in addition to the publicly-accessible
waterfront promenade previously identified in the Part 1- Phase 1 Report).
ATTACHr:"EiJT TO
REP"' . PG_D `d I O I 017
REPORT NUMBER PD 26-00 June 8, 2000
Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review: Part 1- Phase 2 Report Page 7
separate from this Detailed Review, including a Statutory Public Information Meeting.
Informational revisions to the Official Plan can be adopted by Council at any time.
Informational revisions include the updating of the Neighbourhood Map for the Bay
Ridges Neighbourhood, as well as informational text (detailed in Appendix IV to Report
Number PD 26-00). Staff recommend that Council adopt "Informational Revision No. 8
to the Pickering Official Plan" attached as Appendix IV to Report Number PD 26-00.
Certain amendments to the Pickering Official Plan are required to provide a strong policy
foundation for future development within the Waterfront Node. A specific vision and set
of objectives emerged through the Detailed Review. Proper Official Plan policy is
critical to the realization of these goals.
Staff have prepared "Potential Amendments to the Pickering Official Plan" attached as
Appendix V to Report Number PD 26-00, for discussion purposes. Such amendments
may include policies that:
• recognize the uniqueness of the area and identify it as a "Waterfront Node";
• ensure that lands are developed at an appropriate scale with an appropriate mix of
uses;
• ensure that appropriate lands are secured for public access to the water's edge;
• require certain waterfront-related uses next to Frenchman's Bay, and potentially
allow other uses within this area if detailed development proposals contributes
appropriately to a sense of public realm at the water's edge;
• require that proponents of development enter to agreements with the City; and
• encourage opportunities to rejuvenate the historic Village of Fairport by permitting
small-scale commercial uses, subject to certain criteria and site-specific rezoning
applications.
As mentioned previously, amendments to the Official Plan will require a public
consultation process separate from this Detailed Review. Accordingly, staff recommend
that Council direct staff to hold a Statutory Public Information Meeting on
August 10, 2000, to discuss potential amendments to the Pickering Official Plan required
to implement the recommendations of the "Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review:
Part 1 - Phase 2 Report", as generally set out in Appendix V to Report Number
PD 26-00.
3.0 Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review - Part 2
We would like to thank everyone who participated in Part 1 of the Liverpool Road South
Area Detailed Review, including over 150 members of the public, area landowners, staff
of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, and Region of Durham, as well as the
consulting firms of Totten Sims Hubicki Associates, Markson Borooah Hodgson
Architects and TCI Management Consultants Limited.
The Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review: Part 1 - Phase 2 Report, provides a
specific vision for future development within the Liverpool Road Waterfront Node, and
establishes the framework necessary to review development applications. It is now
appropriate to move forward with Part 2 of the Detailed Review, which will result with
detailed architectural and landscape guidelines.
Accordingly, staff recommend that Council direct staff to commence with the "Liverpool
Road South Area Detailed Review - Part 2", as per the Council-adopted Terms of
Reference for the Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review. Additionally, staff
recommend that Report Number PD 26-00 be forwarded to the City's Waterfront
Coordinating Committee, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, and the
Region of Durham.
ATTACHMENT #! T+
REPOP7 * PD --a -o
APPENDIX V TO
REPORT NUMBER PD 26-00
019
POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS
TO THE PICKERING OFFICIAL PLAN
ATIAMvliv
REPpR i ?r pE,1G
021
(j) for development proposed within the Waterfront Node, consider
requiring that proponents enter into agreements with the City
regarding:
(i) landowner funding for a control architect retained by the City to
assist in the review of development proposals;
(ii) accommodating public access to the water's edge;
(iii) construction and provision of public roads; and
(iv) any other matters Council deems necessary;
(k) with respect to the provision of parking within the Waterfront Node,
consider:
(i) permitting landowners to enter into long term agreements with
other landowners respecting the provision of required parking; and
(ii) accepting cash-in-lieu of required parking;
(1) encourage opportunities to rejuvenate the historic Village of Fairport as
a "lakefront village", and to this end, shall consider site-specific
rezoning applications to permit in conjunction with the residential use,
activities such as tea rooms, craft shops, art studios, and professional
offices, provided that:
(i) the scale of the proposed use is compatible with surrounding uses;
(ii) appropriate off-street parking is available either on the lot or in
nearby public parking areas;
(iii) the exterior of the home retains its residential character;
(iv) signage is discretely accommodated; and
(v) any other matters identified by Council are addressed appropriately;
(m) when considering proposals for bay-fill, ensure the proposal is limited in
scale, designed to facilitate waterfront public amenities and pedestrian
access, and improves environmental conditions of Frenchman's Bay
and its shoreline;
VARIATION TO EXISTING Op (n) consider providing a municipal boat launch along Front Street near
Commerce Street, or at the foot of Sandy Beach Road on the west side
of the Pickering Nuclear Generating Station; and
EXISTING ?0 (o) encourage the use and operation of the Lake Ontario Waterfront Trail in
a manner sensitive to the interests of the neighbouring residents, and
provide local trail connections with the Waterfront Trail in appropriate
locations.
ATTACHMENT
REPORT # PE) Drip
023
-2-
6. That Council direct staff to hold a Statutory Public Information Meeting
following Phase 2 to discuss potential amendments to the Pickering Official
Plan required to implement the recommendations of the "Liveol Road
South Area Detailed Review: Pant 1 rpo
- Phase 2 Report"% as generall y set out in
Appendix V to Report Number PD 26-00 as amended by deleting Clause (m)
and substituting therefore the following:
(m) Proposals for bay-fill shall be considered only in cases where bay-.fill
represents the best environmental benefit to the watershed and when
considering proposals for bay-fill, ensure the proposal is limited in scale,
designed to facilitate waterfront public amenities and pedestrian access,
and improves environmental conditions of Frenchman's Bay and its
shoreline;
and as further amended by deferring Clause (g) and Clause (h) for
consideration in Phase 2
7. That Council direct staff to commence with the "Liverpool Road South Area
Detailed Review - Part", as per the Council adopted Terms of Reference for
the Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review; and
8. That Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of Report Number PD
26-00 to the City's Waterfront Coordinating Committee, the Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority, and the Region of Durham
This resolution is sent to you for your information.
//--? L -
Bruce Taylor, City Clerk
cc. T.J. Quinn, Chief Administrative Officer
ATTACHMENT
Mayor Arthurs REPORT # PG Ge?o Liverpool Road South Area Detailed Review & February 6, 2001
Pickering Harbour Company Applications
Page 2
Option 2A recognizes that the City may initiate its OPA for the entire Waterfront Node now (by
resolution), and use the Statutory Public Meeting and subsequent review proces resolve issues
that were apparent is Council's "approval in principle" of the Part 1 results s of the Detailed
Review. At the same time, Council may lift, from the table, all 3 resolutions for the PHC
applications, and adopt the staff recommendations. (Although the staff recommendations require
that a by-law for the Phase 1 lands not be approved until the City's Amendment is adopted by
Council, the Pickering Harbour Company can use the intervening period to prepare revised plans
and required supporting documentation.)
Thus, the process under Option 2A would proceed as follows (see diagonally-] ined squares on
attached chart): -
• Council commences, by new resolution, City-initiated OPA & lifts, from the table, the
Pickering Harbour Company (PHC) resolutions and adopts the staff recommendations:
late February/early March, 2001;
• Council holds Statutory Public Meeting for City's OPA: April, 2001;
• Council adopts results of Parts 1 & 2 of the Review in full & adopts City-initiated
Amendment: June, 2001;
• Council considers the PHC applications by passing a by-law for Phase 1, and considers a
recommendation on the zoning change for Phase 2: September, 2001 - Phase 1;
December, 2001 - Phase 2.
Under Option 2A, it is anticipated that the City will complete all aspects of the Liverpool Road
South Area Detailed Review by the end of August, 2001. The Pickering Harbour Company
applications could follow as quickly as the applicant is able to prepare revised plans and required
documentation.
Option 2B is concurrent consideration in part of the related planning matters. This option
would follow the same general sequence as Option 2A, but recognizes that Council has the option
to commence the City-initiated OPA for only a ortion of the lands within the Waterfront Node.
For example, it could include all lands east of Liverpool Road (including the former Hilts and
Coolwater Farms lands, plus all lands on the west side of Liverpool Road excluding the Phase 2
lands of the PHC). Under this option, various steps (such as the statutory public meeting) would
have to be repeated for the remaining lands in the future.
Alternatively, the entire amendment could be initiated, but, at the time of Council adoption,
Council could adopt the amendment only as it affects certain lands. Similarly, Council, in
considering whether to lift from the table all 3 PHC resolutions, may conclude that only lifting
the resolution dealing with Phase 1 lands is appropriate.
Recommendation
The Department's recommendation is that Option 2A be pursued. Concurrent processing, in
whole, of the related matters is the most expeditious, and avoids the delays associated with
Option 1, and avoids the duplication in effort that will be necessary with Option 2B.
Nevertheless, Option 2B provides Council with a fall-back position at any point in the process,
but particularly if Council wishes to split the City's Amendment at the adoption stage, and/or lift
from the table only the PHC resolution dealing with Phase 1 lands.
Please let me know if you require additional information.
CLR/jf
CIrl1vm]rds\status2x.d.
Attachment
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
Catherine L. Rose
025
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Director, Planning & Development
ATTACHMENT #_ S TO
REPORT # PG Og_ o L__
Q
w
z
F
z
O
u
O
FU
00
a
Ito
a
a
O
O
x
W?
U
a
3
w
w
a
N
w
AW
a
x
H
O
d
a
o°
CIO
0.4
a
z
H
a
O
z
H
I
a?
0 4°
a w ? O
O V as
y N U
O
? , O
?U
O Z E as
N a" ? a
O UO U O w
r- o
o sy ^a U 't7 on
as u U O ~ as . Er
y as
O1 cn
O U
,o'? oo°'o
? 4? O p p
as
U n U '.r U a iUi
sy x o sx ?, U U
t
as N '? U
o O ?t° C)
0
`0 U as t
o
~ O
as" p° 0 3 U
O .C
a x o ~
o o
s~ U O
al al . 0 as t4l:i
vi _U O N ? ,?
03 a ? ? U ? b
bA U o
r?+ f~ a U
CS
as Q)
a o - as V
0
Ew ?.? s 0
as
? .
0
O s~ „? ``" U ? 4~ ?
s~ O U.-
as ? p U ti
p 0 m as as
z w; b
O • ,•-ti U O
r-I
o u U y 0 U U
o a ?U
.? 0 0 3 x ?, >, -o
s. s~
r_n
cp U°OUOz
4 4) ;5
as em
as C c
.. O O O y
O U O °' ,.? sz ? as
ao ?3
c/) 027
3 0 ° o N
O .0 = as s. pq
.= as
y U 3 U .2 C23
N O
04 -6 as 0 C)
ON v
as v U O\ ?+ U w+ as t?. 4S.,
rA O O Q' 1.,. a as ?'•' as O t to
N 0 " - ? 0 0 C13 t-0- as t
as as Its 0-4 C-) i
m
o
En w
U ? o t3, y ,., O U a,
H .0 Q as 'p L;? " , o is
p °' as as b O i p O Q"
a?
to E -0
'b y 0 y p o 'rn as
to E
i.
0 40. 60 (71 cso w 3 as as O o c 0
U U
s; A O0, dasA Q" ?= 'C TJ
U O to b L C,3 0
as
bA V 0 ? al ?• l sU.
as O N on -0 a, b b o
O as C'n +Z 5
) CTS U 4. bA U
4. 0 3 .S O as
in. 0 4, 0 0 0
as It:) cr
2 >
V r. 03
Q) x
as 4'
>, En cl
..d O
En W U O = O b U s~
0 0.0 as
"IV
"o 'cl ?Op" 0
0 4.5 as
b d w ?::z U 44, .- (D 4Z cd 0
en b > °
ca as
aoo -d o 0 wr - = 2:, s?.
'D as
cn (L)
o sue, a U
-dam '? o?? ?'"4,w 4 ?
as 0 4-, 0
",z) as cd ° s~ as
0 as in. w as ?? w ,n Q• .d
s?.
CIS
O as 3 3 b 0
O U s~ U O U U +? °
4- 0 o as
v 'C as 64
C1, as .?U" cUn t" :? y lz
as as Qj ?.+ ? as o U O O
3 as i.. +r _o o t~ v? al
o 4-4 as Z as
o ° ?° v 0
.u as ° S. d o -d as
a
° a 0 t5 -F b 'L7 " w w
O o
cn W as *C4
0 0 as 4~ a o a? ° U
=
V C's
> o 4) f~ U G? ?+ =° O P " U U Q I-,
.° U rn° o oo`?? o 0
r.. p C) U U
40 O 44 O ?bA ~ °p N N O O
(N as
> as Ed
O t. p p
C,3 0. u '9
z I
>?
N " .D
cn <f v? r U 4T.
FROM: Bruce Taylor, AMCT, CMM DATE: February 26, 2001
City Clerk
REPORT NUMBER: CL 04-01
REVISED
SUBJECT: Proposed Increase to Taxicab Fares and Decrease in Transfer Fee
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That Clerk's Report CL 04-01 regarding a proposed increase in taxicab fares and a
decrease in the transfer fee of taxicab owners' licences be received; and
2. That the draft by-law to provide for the following be enacted:
a) An increase in the taxicab drop charge from $2.15, incl. GST, to $2.45, incl. GST,
(14.0%),
b) An increase in the kilometre charge from $1.20 per kilometre, incl. GST, to $1.30
per kilometre, incl. GST (8.3%),
c) An increase in the fee for waiting from 30 cents per minute, incl. GST, to 40 cents
per minute, incl. GST,
d) A decrease in the transfer fee for owner's plates from $4,000 to $500.
ORIGIN:
Petition signed by taxicab owners and submitted to City at a meeting held on January 26, 2001.
This petition was updated as of the Executive Committee Meeting of February 12, 2001.
AUTHORITY:
Section 232 of the Municipal Act
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Decrease in revenue of approximately $17,500 based on an average of five transfers per year and
based on a decrease in the transfer fee of $4,000 to $500.
EXECUTIVE SLTNIMARY:
As a result of a request from taxicab owners set out in a petition, at its meeting of February 12,
2001, the Executive Committee considered a recommendation to increase the fares for hiring a
taxicab effective March 1, 2001 and March 1, 2002. There was also a request made to lower the
transfer fee of taxicab owners' plates from $4,000.00 to a lower amount which I have set at
$500.00.
Report to Council CL 04-01
Subject: Taxicab Fares & Transfer Fees
Page 3
To put the proposed increases in perspective, the following are the charges that would be incurred
if a person hired a taxicab to travel various distances:
MUNICIPALITY FARE FOR
TRAVELLING
TWO
KILOMETRES FARE FOR
TRAVELLING
SIX
KILOMETRES FARE FOR
TRAVELLING
TEN
KILOMETRES FARE FOR
TRAVELLING
TWENTY
KILOMETRES
Pickering resent $4.55 $9.35 $14.15 $26.15
Brampton $4.95 $10.55 $16.15 $30.15
Pickerin ro osed $5.115 $10.25 $15.45 528,45
Oshawa $5.05 $10.65 $16.25 $30.25
A' ax $5.15 $10.75 $16.35 $30.35
Markham, Vaughan,
Richmond Hill,
Toronto $5.18 $10.55 $15.90 $29.30
Mississauga $5.40 $10.20 $15.00 $27.00
ci,¦ ugut un m Luc auuvc unarL MUM= Me lrJ I.
As can be noted above, the combination of an increase in the drop charge and kilometre charge
will result in an increase of 11.0% based on a two kilometre trip. It must be noted that there has
been no fare increases since November 20, 1989.
TRANSFER FEE
Council passed the current Taxicab By-law in 1986 and limited the number of taxicab owners'
plates that could be issued at 48. This was based on one plate being issued for every 950
population which was the standard in most GTA municipalities that limited plate issuance in 1986.
At that time, Council also prohibited the transfer of owners' plates because there were 100
owners plates issued and Council wanted this number to drop to a figure that was close to 48. In
1987, the taxicab industry requested that transfers of owners' plates be allowed under certain
strict conditions and Council amended the Taxicab By-law setting strict criteria for transferring
plates, namely that the plate has remained valid for five years and upon payment of a fee of
$4,000.
The following is a chart which sets out the transfer fee charged by other municipalities and the
population factor used to limit the number of plates issued:
MUNICIPALITY TRANSFER FEE PLATES TO
POPULATION RATIO
Oshawa $50 1:1,500
Markham $100 1:1,500
Vaughan $400 1:1,200
Richmond Hill $500 1:1,500
Mississauga $1,600 Other formula used
Brampton $3,000 1:1,800
Pickerin S47000 1:950
A'ax No transfer fee Not applicable
Toronto No transfer fee Not applicable
The number of plates that are active at present is 74. Although the Taxicab By-law still limits the
number of plates to be issued at 48, based on the current population of the City of 88,000, a total
of 93 plates could be issued based on the formula developed in 1987 of one plate per 950 of
population.
Date: February 5, 2001
0 3 1.
woe
e.4' .
ATTACH MEN"-T i`U REPORT # Sly 04- c-) 1
033
e A16
S-
t6
123
S?
Taxi
b
e19
/-?
'XI
.--73
33
'- P-- 3L
p-Rq
?? ID P-36 - 39
P-31 p- 109.
V/Y 10 N CHAN cL-
?NI?17"sM 0 1 ?DN? N YIMAJ::9?
4
f o 4`r///?C?"" ^
A
? r_ r
f P fJ
7 /W
3
f ?? ??U 1- JC g JA
91
?7?
t -Ra P-J3, -P---7a
7 j A - Q? V??
ATl'ACHMEN? =r ?'. T= c.j. 04- CJI
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING 035
BY-LAW NO.
Being a by-law to amend By-law Number 2206/86
for the licensing, regulating and governing of
taxicab drivers, owners and brokers.
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering enacted By-law Number
2206/86 on May 5, 1986 to licence, regulate and govern taxicab drivers, owners and brokers; and
WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to decrease the fee for transferring a taxicab owner's licence
and to increase the rates and fares charged for hiring a taxicab;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF
PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. Subsection (b)(iii) of Section 45 of By-law Number 2206/86, as amended by By-law
Number 2473/87, is hereby deleted and the following is substituted therefore:
(iii) upon payment to the City of a fee of $500.00; and
2. Schedule "B" to By-law Number 2206/86, as amended by By-law Number 3320/89, is
hereby deleted and Schedule "I" attached hereto is substituted therefore.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 5' day of March, 2001.
Wayne Arthurs, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
0 37
RESOLUTION OF COUNCIL
DATE
MOVED BY
SECONDED BY
1. That Clerk's Report CL 10-01 regarding appointments to the Pickering Youth
Partnership Initiative be received; and
2. That the draft by-law to make the following appointments to the Pickering Youth
Partnership be enacted:
a)
b)
Councillor
Community representatives:
Paul Pryce
Suzanne Greenbury
Marsha Quigley
C) Pickering Youth Council:
Brendon Bell
Chantal Muia
d) YMCA - Durham Employment Services:
Tina Doyle
e) Human Resources Development Canada:
Cathy Twaites
Sharon Little
f) Public Library Board:
Colleen Bolin
CARRIED:
MAYOR
Report to Council CL 10-01 Date: February 28, 2001
Subject: Appointments to Youth Partnership Initiative Page 2
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Council passed Resolution #3/01 at its regular meeting of January 15, 2001 to establish a Youth
Partnership Initiative to work cooperatively with the Youth Council, youth organizations,
community members and students to facilitate new programs, drop-in centres and activities aimed
at giving greater opportunity for youth to participate in the community. The resolution also
provides for representatives of various community groups and agencies to be represented on this
committee and the purpose of this Report is to advise Council of persons wishing to sit on this
committee.
BACKGROUND:
Please be advised that Council passed the following resolution at its regular meeting of January
15, 2001:
WHEREAS the Corporation of the City of Pickering has made an on-going
commitment to youth and to providing positive outlets for youth to express
themselves; and
WHEREAS several meetings were held on an ad-hoc basis with community
members and youth organizations where there was an expressed desire to see
a broader opportunity for community input and facilitation of partnerships;
and
WHEREAS youth programs, youth centres and youth initiatives undertaken
by not-for-profit organizations augment actions taken by the Corporation of
the City of Pickering and greatly benefit our community as a whole;
NOW THEREFORE the Corporation of the City of Pickering establish a
Youth Partnership Initiative to work co-operatively with the Youth Council,
youth organizations, community members and students to facilitate new
programs, drop-in-centres and activities aimed at giving greater opportunity
for youth to participate in our community; and
THAT the Youth Partnership Initiative be comprised of three community
members, a student representative from the Youth Council, a representative
from the YMCA, a representative from Human Resources Development
Canada and one member of Pickering City Council; and
THAT the membership of the Youth Partnership Initiative be determined by
Council prior to February 15, 2001 and that subsequent representatives be
selected by Council, along with other committee selections, in the beginning
of each new term of Council.
Attached to this Report is a copy of a Notice that was published in the News Advertiser on
Wednesday, February 21, 2001 inviting residents to submit an application for appointment to the
Pickering Youth Partnership Initiative. In addition to this Notice, letters were sent to the
Pickering Youth Council, the YMCA-Durham Employment Services and Human Resources
Development Canada. The following are applications received from the community and the
agencies:
039
Report to Council CL 10-01
Subject: Appointments to Youth Partnership Initiative
Prepared
ruce Taylor
Attachments
Recommended for the consideration of Pickering
City Council
f?C,/il?'• C
T omas J. Qui Chief Admi ' tra ' Offs er
Date: February 28, 2001
Page 4 Q 41
ATTACHMENT # I TO REPORT # c 1- io - 6 2
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING 043
BY-LAW NO.
Being a by-law to appoint persons to the Pickering
Youth Partnership Initiative.
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering passed Resolution #3/01 at
its regular meeting of January 15, 2001 to establish the Youth Partnership Initiative;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF
PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. The following persons are hereby appointed to the Youth Partnership Initiative for a term
to expire on November 30, 2003:
a) Councillor
b) Community representatives:
Paul Pryce
Suzanne Greenbury
Marsha Quigley
c) Pickering Youth Council:
Brendon Bell
Chantal Muia
d) YMCA - Durham Employment Services:
Tina Doyle
e) Human Resources Development Canada:
Cathy Twaites
Sharon Little
f) Public Library Board:
Colleen Bolin
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 5t` day of March, 2001.
Wayne Arthurs, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
045
4. EFFECTIVE DATE
This By-law shall take effect from the day of passing hereof subject to the approval of the
Ontario Municipal Board, if required.
BY-LAW read a first, second, and third time and finally passed this day of
, 2001.
Wayne Arthurs, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, City Clerk
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING 047
BY-LAW NO. 5807/01
Being a by-law to amend By-law Number 2206/86
for the licensing, regulating and governing of
taxicab drivers, owners and brokers.
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering enacted By-law Number
2206/86 on May 5, 1986 to licence, regulate and govern taxicab drivers, owners and brokers; and
WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to decrease the fee for transferring a taxicab owner's licence
and to increase the rates and fares charged for hiring a taxicab;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF
PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. Subsection (b)(iii) of Section 45 of By-law Number 2206/86, as amended by By-law
Number 2473/87, is hereby deleted and the following is substituted therefore:
(iii) upon payment to the City of a fee of $500.00; and
2. Schedule "B" to By-law Number 2206/86, as amended by By-law Number 3320/89, is
hereby deleted and Schedule "I" attached hereto is substituted therefore.
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 5t' day of March, 2001.
Wayne Arthurs, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING 049
BY-LAW NO. 5808/01
Being a by-law to appoint persons to the Pickering
Youth Partnership Initiative.
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering passed Resolution #3/01 at
its regular meeting of January 15, 2001 to establish the Youth Partnership Initiative;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF
PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. The following persons are hereby appointed to the Youth Partnership Initiative for a term
to expire on November 30, 2003:
a) Councillor
b) Community representatives:
Paul Pryce
Suzanne Greenbury
Marsha Quigley
C) Pickering Youth Council:
Brendon Bell
Chantal Muia
d) YMCA - Durham Employment Services:
Tina Doyle
e) Human Resources Development Canada:
Cathy Twaites
Sharon Little
f) Public Library Board:
Colleen Bolin
BY-LAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this 5 h day of March, 2001.
Wayne Arthurs, Mayor
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
05.
j
CONFIDENTIAL
RESOLUTION OF COUNCIL
DATE
MOVED RY
SECONDED BI'
That Confidential Report to Council CL 9-01 regarding a request for financial assistance
from the Pickering Aerials Crynuut-stic Club be received and that:
1. A grant in the amount of $28,231.79 be made to assist the Pick" Aerials
Cy nnastics Club with the shortfall resulting ftom the December 27 , 1999 fire at
their Club facility.
2. That this grant be charged to Account 2195 (Grants to Organizations and
Individuals).
1. That the Clerk be directed to inform the Pickering Aerials Grymnastics Club that
their request dated April 17, 2000 for financial support, with the shortfall resulting
from the December 27'h, 1999 fire at their Club facility was denied.
CARRIED:
MAYOR