HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD 52-02 (Addendum)
REPORT TO
COUNCIL
09
Addendum to Report Number: PO 52-02
Date: January 10, 2003
From:
Neil Carroll
Director, Planning & Development
Subject:
Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 02-001/P
City Initiated: Rouge Park Neighbourhood Study Implementation
City of Pickering
Recommendation:
1.
That Addendum to Report Number PO 52-02, concerning the Rouge Park
Neighbourhood Study implementation, be received;
2.
(a)
(b)
3.
That Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 02-001/P, initiated by the
City of Pickering, to implement the results of the Rouge Park
Neighbourhood Study, as follows:
.
revise Schedule I - land Use Structure to adjust the boundaries of
the Urban Residential and Open Space designations;
revise Schedule III - Resource Management to adjust the boundaries of
the Shoreline and Stream Corridor, Wetlands and Rouge-Duffins
Wildlife Corridor designations;
revise the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor Policies; and
revise the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Policies;
.
.
.
be APPROVED, as revised, as set out in Appendix I to Addendum to
Report Number PO 52-02;
That the draft by-law to adopt Amendment 11 to the Pickering Official Plan be
ENACTED by Council, as set out in Appendix I to Addendum to
Report Number PO 52-02.
That Amendment 1 to the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Development Guidelines be
ADOPTED by Council, as set out in Appendix /I to Addendum to Report
Number PD 52-02.
Executive Summary: Revised land use and resource management designations
are proposed for one property following consideration of the comments made by three
local residents at the Planning Committee meeting held December 9, 2002. Planning
Committee referred the proposed amendment to Council for consideration at its
meeting scheduled for January 20, 2003, so that staff could address the concerns of
several residents.
1 0 Addendum to Report PO 52-02
Date: January 10, 2002
Subject: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 02-001/P
Page 2
Staff from the City and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, following a site
visit, support minor revisions to the land use and resource management designations
for the Daniell's property, and have clarified that only minimal buffering from the
adjacent wildlife corridor is required when the Stock property is redeveloped. City Staff
has discussed a broad range of concerns with the third resident (Barber) and is not
recommending deletion of the required road connection from the Official Plan
amendment.
Staff recommend that Council adopt Official Plan Amendment 11 and Amendment 1 to
the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Development Guidelines as set out in Appendices I
and II of Addendum to Report Number 52-02 in order to complete its consideration of
the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Study. Amendment 11 includes the minor revisions to
land use and resource management designations referred to in the previous paragraph.
Financial Implications:
Not Applicable.
1.0 Background: On December 9, 2002, Planning Committee referred the
recommendations in Report Number 52-02 to the January 20, 2003 Council
meeting (see Attachment #1) so that staff could respond to the concerns
expressed by three residents and the written comment submitted at the Planning
Committee meeting.
1.1 Minor Revisions to Designations in the Amendment in Response to
Mr. Daniell's Comments
Mr. Daniell commented that the Open Space land use and Rouge-Duffins Wildlife
Corridor resource management designations proposed for the southern third of the
property at 1979 Woodview Avenue would remove approximately a third of the
development capacity from his lands.
A site visit was conducted with the City planner, the TRCA planner, the TRCA
biologist and Mr. Daniell present. TRCA staff advised that the Open Space
designation proposed does not represent the limits of the natural features on the
subject lands, as defined by TRCA's biologist (see Attachment #2). TRCA also
advised that the open space lands should be transferred to public ownership when
new lots are created on the property and the lots should be set back a minimum of
10 metres from the limits of the natural features. A copy of the TRCA comments
will be retained on file in the Department to guide consideration of future
development proposals for Mr. Daniell's property.
Accordingly, the Open Space - Natural Area designation on Schedule I - land
Use Structure should be removed from the front part of the southern third of the
property and added to the rear third of the entire property to properly reflect the
existing natural features on the property.
Addendum to Report PD 52-02
Date: January 10, 2002
11
Subject: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 02-001/P
Page 3
In addition, the Wetland and Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor designations on
Schedule III - Resource Management should be revised to conform to this
Open Space - Natural Area designation.
Schedule 'A' - land Use Structure and Schedules 'B' and 'C' (amending the
Resource Management Schedule) of proposed Official Plan Amendment 11 have
been revised, as set out in Appendix I to Addendum to Report Number 52-02.
1.2 Need For Only A Minimal Buffer Confirmed In Response To Mr. Stock's
Concerns
Mr. Stock expressed concern with the proposed redesignation of the front part of
an Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC) property at 1968 Woodview Avenue, which
is the property immediately north of Mr. Stock's property (1960 Woodview
Avenue). Mr. Stock was concerned that the proposed redesignation to
Open Space and Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor would require his property to
incorporate such a large buffer zone that it would become undevelopable.
The City planner, the TRCA planner and the TRCA biologist also conducted a site
visit of 1968 Woodview when Mr. Daniell's property was evaluated. TRCA staff
advise that since the rear part of the property is wetland, the front part of the
property is naturally vegetated, and the lands to the east of Woodview Avenue are
occupied by naturally vegetated wetland, the ORC property serves as a natural
corridor for wetland species and should be designated as Rouge-Duffins Wildlife
Corridor and Open Space - Natural Area in the Pickering Official Plan. These
designations are consistent with the recommendations contained in the
Environmental Master Servicing Plan for the Rouge Park Neighbourhood and the
Rouge Park Development Guidelines, which were previously endorsed by Council
in April, 2000, and supported by the ORC, the owner of the property.
TRCA staff have also advised that since the front part of the ORC property north
of Mr. Stock's property is somewhat disturbed, (there is a house and a raised
septic bed), the buffering required for any redevelopment on Mr. Stock's property
can be minimal (see Attachment #3). The Planning & Development Department
has provided Mr. Stock with a letter stating that minimal buffering of possible future
residential development on the front part of Mr. Stock's property, from the property
to the north, is supported by both TRCA and the Department. A copy of the letter
will be retained on file in the Department to guide the future consideration of
development proposals for Mr. Stock's property.
1.3 No Deletion of Policy Requiring Road Connection Despite Comments of
Mrs. Barber
At the Planning Committee meeting, Ms. Barber requested deletion of the policy
requirement for a road connection from the north side of Finch Avenue to the west
side of Rosebank Road and requested a delay to allow her to meet with Planning
staff to discuss various matters.
12
Addendum to Report PO 52-02
Date: January 10, 2002
Subject: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 02-001/P
Page 4
Planning & Development staff met with Ms. Barber on January 9, 2003, and
discussed her concerns, which were similar to the concerns raised in her letter
submitted following the Statutory Public Information Meeting held in June 2002.
Ms. Barber's concerns were reviewed in greater detail than was done in the staff
responses contained in Table 1 - Summary of Comments Received and Staff
Responses On Proposed Official Plan Amendment 11, which is Attachment #13 to
Report Number 52-02.
As a result, it is not recommended that policy 11.16 (v), which requires a road
connection from the north side of Finch Avenue to the west side of
Rosebank Road, be amended at this time. A minor clarification to proposed policy
10.17(e) (Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor) was agreed on and is reflected in
Amendment 11 in Appendix I to Addendum to Report Number 52-02.
1.4 No Additional Protection Proposed for the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor
Despite Comment of Ms. James
Ms. James submitted a letter dated December 9, 2002, to Planning Committee
requesting an extra effort be made to protect the wildlife corridor between
Rouge Park and the Altona Forest in order to encourage the best possible survival
of wildlife habitat and species (see Attachment #4).
Staff consider that the policies and designations proposed in Official Plan
Amendment 11 balance the needs for both private development and for protection
of wetlands and the wildlife corridor within the Rouge Park Neighbourhood. TRCA
is supportive of the proposed amendment.
Conclusion:
Following review of the concerns expressed at the Planning Committee meeting held
December 9, 2002, it is recommended that Council implement the final aspect of the
Rouge Park Neighbourhood Study by enactment and adoption respectively of Official
Plan Amendment 11 and Amendment 1 to the Rouge Park Neighbourhood
Development Guidelines as set out in the Appendices to this Addendum to
Report Number 52-02.
Appendices
APPENDIX I:
By-law to adopt Amendment No, 11 to the Pickering Official Plan for
the Rouge Park Neighbourhood (Amendment included as Exhibit lA' to
By-law)
Amendment 1 to the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Development
Guidelines
APPENDIX II:
Addendum to Report PD 52-02
Date: January 10, 2002
13
Subject: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 02-001/P
Page 5
Attachments:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Planning Committee Meeting Minutes for December 9, 2002
Comments of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, dated December 16, 2002
Comments of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, dated January 10, 2003
Letter from Lois James dated December 9, 2002
Prepared By:
Approved I Endorsed By:
.~ 1Þ?~3-
Steve Gaunt, MC/P, RPP
Planner II
,,"
Neil Carroll,
Director, PIa'
(jd-~ ì i&-
Catherine Rose
Manager, Policy
SG:jf
Attachments
Copy: Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering City Council
14
APPENDIX I TO
ADDENDUM TO
REPORT NUMBER PD 52-02
BY-LAW TO ADOPT OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT 11
TO THE
PICKERING OFFICIAL PLAN
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING
15
BY-lAW NO.
DRAFT
Being a By-law to adopt Amendment 11 to the
Official Plan for the City of Pickering.
(OPA 02-001/P);
WHEREAS pursuant to the Planning Act, RS.O. 1990, chapter 13, subsections
17(22) and 21 (1), the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering may by
by-law adopt amendments to the Official Plan for the City of Pickering;
AND WHEREAS pursuant to Section 17(10) of the Planning Act, the Minister of
Municipal Affairs and Housing has by order authorized Regional Council to pass a
by-law to exempt proposed area municipal official plan amendments from its
approval;
AND WHEREAS, the Region has advised that this Amendment is NOT exempt from
Regional approval;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCil OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CI1Y OF PICKERING
HEREBY ENACTS AS FOllOWS:
1. That Amendment 11 to the Official Plan for the City of Pickering, attached hereto
as Exhibit "A", is hereby adopted;
2. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward to the
Regional Municipality of Durham the documentation required by Procedure:
Area Municipal Official Plans and Amendments, to seek Regional approval of an
Amendment to the Pickering Official Plan;
3. This By-law shall come into force and take effect on the day of the final passing
hereof.
BY-lAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this
January, 2003.
day of
Wayne Mhu rs, ~~
Bruce Taylor, Clerk
16
Exhibit "A" to By-law
AMENDMENT 11
TO TH E
CITY OF PICKERING OFFICIAL PLAN
17
AMENDMENT 11 TO THE CITY OF PICKERING OFFICIAL PLAN
PURPOSE:
The purpose of the amendment is to revise the boundaries of
residential and open space designations on Schedule I - Land Use
Structure, revise the boundaries of Wetlands, the Rouge-Duffins
Wildlife Corridor and Shorelines and Stream Corridors on
Schedule III - Resource Management, revise the Rouge-Duffins
Wildlife Corridor policies and revise the Rouge Park
Neighbourhood policies to implement the results of the Rouge Park
Neighbourhood Study.
LOCATION:
The amendment affects all lands in the Rouge Park
Neighbourhood, which is located on the west side of Pickering at
the northern limit of the City's South Urban Area.
This area is approximately 160 hectares in size.
BASIS:
The Rouge Park Neighbourhood Study was completed for lands in
the City of Pickering and received by City Council in April 2000.
City Council adopted a comprehensive plan to guide future
development of the neighbourhood through two principal
documents: the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Environmental Master
Servicing Plan and the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Development
Guidelines.
The Environmental Master Servicing Plan provided direction on
edge management strategies between developable and
non-developable areas to ensure that new development maintains
and enhances adjacent natural features and functions. It also
established a stormwater management strategy.
The Rouge Park Neighbourhood Development Guidelines
established urban design criteria and identified school and park
sites and major street connections.
The Land Use objectives for this amendment are to adjust the
boundaries of the land use designations to accurately reflect the
findings of the Environmental Master Servicing Plan and adopt
policies for both the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor and the
Rouge Park Neighbourhood that will guide development in the
manner articulated in the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Development
Guidelines. Wetland boundaries shown on the amended
Resource Management schedule are based on updated 1999
mapping from the Ministry of Natural Resources.
18
Appendix 1 to Addendum to Report PO 52-02
Page 2
Amendment 11 to the Pickerinq Official Plan - Amendment to By-law to Adopt Official Plan
ACTUAL
AMENDMENT:
1.
2.
3.
Council of the City of Pickering passed resolution #29/00, Item #1,
at its meeting of April 10, 2000, which included initiating this
proposed amendment to the Pickering Official Plan to implement
the results of the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Study and a number
of other associated recommendations. The proposed amendment
has been prepared considering comments received at the Statutory
Public Information meeting held on June 19,2002.
The Pickering Official Plan be amended by:
Revising Schedule I - Land Use Structure to revise the
boundary between the designations of Open Space System -
Natural Area and Urban Residential Areas - Low Density
Areas for certain lands in the Rouge Park N eighbourhood, as
set out on Schedule 'N;
Revising Schedule III - Resource Management
Schedule, to:
(i)
revise the delineation of Wetlands in the Rouge
Park Neighbourhood, as set out on Schedule 'ß';
revise the delineation of the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife
Corridor, as set out on Schedule 'C'; and
revise the delineation of Shorelines and Stream
Corridors, as set out on Schedule 'D';
(ii)
(iii)
Revising section 10.17 - Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor
Policies, to add a policy limiting the uses permitted on lands
that are designated both Freeways and Major Utilities -
Potential Multi-Use Area and Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor;
and add a policy encouraging the preparation of a
"Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor Management Plan" such that
section 10.17 reads as follows:
CITY POLICY
Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor
10.17 City Council recognizes that the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife
Corridor is intended to function as a significant
vegetated connector providing for species migration
between the Rouge and Duffins valley systems;
accordingly, Council shall,
Appendix 1 to Addendum to Report PO 52-02
Page 3
19
Amendment 11 to the Pickerinq Official Plan - Amendment to By-law to Adopt Official Plan
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
despite the permissible uses listed in Table 13*,
permit utility and ancillary uses, as well as any
uses permissible within the Open Space System -
Natural Area designation (see Table 3) on lands
designated both Freeways and Major Utilities -
Potential Multi-Use Area on Schedule I and also
Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor on Schedule III;
and,
encourage the Ministry of Natural Resources,
Toronto & Region Conservation Authority,
Region of Durham, Ontario Hydro and interested
others to both prepare a "Rouge-Duffins Wildlife
Corridor Management Plan" and establish
funding for on-going maintenance and
restoration of the Corridor.
Replacing section 11.16 - Rouge Park Neighbourhood Policies
to revise subsections 11.16 (a)(i), (a)(iv) and (d); such that the
entire section 11.16 reads as follows:
4.
CITY POLICY
Rouge Park Neighbourhood Policies
11.16
(a)
City Council shall,
in the consideration of development proposed within the
neighbourhood,
(i)
discourage designs which require the use of
reverse frontages, berms and significant noise
attenuation fencing adjacent to Finch Avenue
and Altona Road, unless justified for a limited
proportion of street frontage within any proposed
development by unique site configuration, road
access or proximity considerations and mitigated
by special design and/or landscaping features;
* A copy of Table 13 is provided for reference at the end of this Amendment.
constitute part of the Amendment.
It does not
20
Appendix 1 to Addendum to Report PO 52-02
Page 4
Amendment 11 to the Pickerinq Official Plan - Amendment to By-law to Adopt Official Plan
(ii)
encourage a "neighbourhood focus" at the
intersection of Finch Avenue and Altona Road
through the utilization of structural massing,
architectural elements, and landscaping that
establishes a strong relationship with the
intersection;
(iii) despite the permissible uses listed in Tables 5*
and 9*, not permit the establishment of
automobile service stations and drive-thru
facilities such as restaurants, banks and
convenience stores within the neighbourhood;
in accordance with sections 15.17 and 15.18,
permit the use of density transfers and bonuses,
as further detailed in the Rouge Park
N eighbourhood Development Guidelines;
require a road connection running from the north
side of Finch Avenue to the west side of
Rosebank Road;
require new development to have regard for the
Rouge Park Management Plan;
encourage the retention of environmentally sensitive
Provincially-owned lands within public ownership and
the appropriate and timely disposition of Provincially-
owned lands outside of the Rouge Park that are not
environmentally sensitive;
endeavour to eliminate the "jog" at the Rosebank Road
and Finch Avenue intersection;
support improvements to the level crossings of the C.P.
rail line at the Scarborough-Pickering Townline Road
and Rosebank Road, such as the installation of
appropriate safety measures including automatic safety
gates; and
for the north-east corner of the Beare Estate/Map Realty
lands, located on the north side of Finch Avenue,
opposite Woodview Avenue, interpret the minimum
extent of the "Open Space System - Natural Areas"
designation to be the southerly drip-line of the existing
hedgerow plus 1 metre, with the maximum extent to be
determined during the review of the related development
applications. **
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
* Copies of Tables 5 and 9 of Chapter 3 are provided for reference at the end of this
Amendment. It does not constitute part of the Amendment.
** This clause reflects the order of the Ontario Municipal Board in its disposition of the
Beare Estate/Map Realty appeaL
Appendix 1 to Addendum to Report PO 52-02
Page 5
21
Amendment 11 to the Pickerinq Official Plan - Amendment to By-law to Adopt Official Plan
IMPLEMENTATION:
The provisions set forth in the Pickering Official Plan, as
amended, regarding the implementation of the Plan shall
apply in regard to this Amendment.
INTERPRETATION:
The provisions set forth in the Pickering Official Plan, as
amended, regarding the interpretation of the Plan shall apply
in regard to this Amendment.
22
Appendix I to Addendum to Report PO 52-02
Paqe 6
CITY POLICY
TABLE 13:
Freewqys and Mqjor Utilities:
Permissible Uses I¿y Subcategory
Utility and ancillary uses;
Public or private uses that are compatible with adjacent land uses, comply:
with the goals, policies and general intent of this Plan, and do not i
adversely affect the operation or use ofthe utility. ¡
~~:::~;~ ..::~.~~~~~.~~: ~ ~..:: ~~~¡:~ ..~.~~.~.;..::~.. ~.~:~~:~..: ~. ~:~:~~'~'~=~'~'~":~""""l
,.".."......."......."...................";.".......;"";"",,,,..J..~~.~~~~~..~~.~.~.'.........................................................................................................................................................................................i
Appendix I to Addendum to Report PO 52-02
Paqe 7
23
CITY POLICY
TABLE 5;
Mixed Use Areas;
Permissible Uses
!?J Subcategory
Retailing of goods and services generally serving the needs of the
surrounding neighbourhoods;
Offices and restaurants;
Community, cultural and recreational uses.
All uses permissible in Local Nodes, at a larger scale and intensity,
and serving a broader area.
All uses permissible in Local Nodes and Community Nodes, at a
scale and intensity equivalent to Community Nodes;
Special purpose commercial uses.
All uses permissible in Local Nodes and Community Nodes, at the
greatest scale and intensity in the City, serving City-wide and regional
levels;
Special purpose commercial uses.
CITY POLICY
TABLE 9;
Urban Residential Areas;
Permissible Uses
Residential uses, home occupations, limited
offices serving the area, and limited
retailing of goods and services serving the
area;
Community, cultural and recreational uses;
Compatible employment uses, and
compatible special purpose commercial
uses serving the area.
REVISED SCHEDULE W TO AMENDMENT 11
REDESIGNATE FROM 'OPEN SPACE
SYSTEM-NATURAL AREAS" TO 'URBAN
RESIDENTIAL AREAS-lOW DENSITY AREAS'
/NTE
------
SCHEDULE ITO THE
PICKERING
OFFICIAL PLAN OPEN ~:: ::;:M
w¿¡ ~ RECREATIONAL
~ MARINA AREAS
m;
,-
I
-.
MIXED USE AREAS
. LOCAL NODES
. COMMUNITY NODES
. MIXED CORRIDORS
. DOWN1UWN CORE
COY '" ....-.-
=-=- -~~:::;;.~=
"'-
REGIONAL NODES
. REGIONAL NODE 1
. REGIONAL NODE 2
0
<{
0
ü::
0
<:(
0
ü::
..
lAND USE STRUcruRE
EMPLOYMENT AREAS FREEWAYS AND MAJOR UTlUTlES
0 GENERAL EMPLOYMENT. POTENTIAL MULTI-USE AREAS
IJII PRESTIGE EMPLOYMENT III CONTROLLED ACCESS AREAS
Ë3 M'XED EMPt.OYMENT OTHER DESIGNATIONS
URBAN RESIDENTIAL AREAS . URBAN STUDY AREAS
lOW DENSITY AREAS SEATON URBAN STUDY AREA
w¿¡ MEDIUM DENSITY AREAS AGRICULruRAL AREAS
~ HIGH DENSIlY AREAS I D11 DEFERRALS
RURAL SETTLEMENTS
. RURAL CLUSTERS
. RURAL """LETS
J
,
\
\
,
I
\
,
,
""'-'
"~'I
\
,
I,
I
\
\
,
,
,
,
,
,-'-'-)
, \
0, I 'Á
I { - ..J "'"
« : ..J "'---- 0
I r
0 ' /-~ rv
I \ LL
rv I ,
LL I
-, I
" \
,-,
,
\
\
I
I
I
/
I
\ ROUGE PARK
-\tIEIGHBOURHOOD
\
\
,
,
J
"
<'
~
I "
,-'..1
+
+
SCHEDULE m TO THE
PICKERING
0 FFI CIAL PLAN
~-:-:-:-~
IJ]]]]
SHOREUNES AND STREAM CORRIDORS
<MAY INCLUDE HAZARD lANDS)
WETlANDS
ENVIRONUrnl"ALLY SIGNIFICANT AREAS
0
ROUGE-DUFFINS WlLDUFE CORRIDOR
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
FORUER LAKE IROQUOIS SHOREUNE
IUIII
ALTONA FOREST POUCY AREA
FLOOD PlAIN SPECIAL POUCY AREAS
ROUGE PARK BOUNDARY
AREAS OF NATURAL AND SCIENTIfIC INTEREST
.
KNOWN WASTE DISPOSAL SITES
...-F~- 1\
------.------
-----------_. "
--~
I
\
\
\
\
I
\
\
\
"'"
--'-,
\
\
<
(,
f
\
\
..
\ --'-'-)
\ ' \
, .--'
,--'"
REVISED SCHEDULE 'C' TO AMENDMENT 11
0, \
I I ' ./f'
I -.J'"
<{ : J "'---- 0
0, r
; /-" rv
I \ u-
rv I ,
u-' I
-, I
" \
,-,
\
\
I
I
+
+
SCHEDULE m TO THE
PICKERING
OFFICIAL PLAN
0
IJIIII]]
SHOREUNES AND STREAM CORRIDORS
(MAY INCUJDE HAZARD lANDS)
WETlANDS
ENVIRONMENTAlLY SIGNIFICANT AREAS
r++l
~
ROUGE-DUFF1NS WILDLIFE CORRIDOR
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
FORMER lAKE IROQUOIS SHOREUNE
111111
ALTONA FOREST POLICY AREA
FLOOD PlAIN SPECIAL POUCY AREAS
ROUGE PARK BOUNDARY
AREAS OF NAlURAL AND SCI£>lT1FIC INTEREST
.
KNOWN WASTE DISPOSAL SITES
---o~~- "^
------.------ I'
-----------_. "
-~
ORIGINAL SCHEDULE 10' TO AMENDMENT 11
0 ¡ I ' <1:
<1: ! j-',,---_J 0
0, r
i (-~ (t
rv I ,
L1- I I
-, I
",j
,
\
I
I
I
I
/
I
\ ROUGE PARK
-\-NEIGHBOURHOOD
\
\
,
\
J
"
<'
~
ì
/ r-
r~';;
I
,
\
I
,
I
\
\
,
""'--
'-,\
\
<
(,
J
\
\
\ .-,-
\ ~-' ~
, .--' .f
'----' ì
\
'(
,)
I..,
}
ENBRIDG'
+
+
SCHEDULE m TO THE
PI CKERIN G
OFFICIAL PLAN
~-:-:-:-~
nmrn
SHOREUNES AND STREAM CORRIDORS
(MAY INCWDE HAZARD LANDS)
WETLANDS
ENVIRONMENTALLY SIGNIFICANT AREAS
r++l
~
ROUGE-DUFFINS WlCDUff CORRIDOR
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
FORMER LAKE IROQUOIS SHOREUNE
lilli'
ALTONA FOREST POUCY AREA
FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL POUCY AREAS
ROUGE PARK BOUNDARY
AR<AS OF NATIJRAI.. AND SCtENTIAC INTEREST
.
KNOWN WASTE DISPOSAL SITES
<nY-""""" l'
...----
----t~_':õ.=----
___M______-_. "
-,-~
AMENDMENT 1 TO THE
APPENDIX II TO
ADDENDUM TO
REPORT NO. PD 52-02
ROUGE PARK NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
24
25
AMENDMENT 1 TO THE ROUGE PARK NEIGHBOURHOOD
DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
ACTUAL
AMENDMENT:
The Rouge Park Neighbourhood Development Guidelines to
be amended by:
In accordance with updated sanitary sewer capacities provided to the City
during the processing of Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 02-
001/P (now Amendment 11 to the Pickering Official Plan), in Section N1.8 -
Neighbourhood Population Targets, replace the number "2200" with
"2000", the number "500" with "550" and the number "1700" with "1450",
such that Section N1.8 reads as follows:
"The Official Plan establishes a population target for the Rouge Park Neighbourhood of
1,600 people. Based solely on the sanitary sewer capacity, a population target of 2,000
people is achievable 550 west of Petticoat Creek, and 1450 east of the creek. However, if
the population were to grow much beyond 1,600 people, the Durham District School
Board has indicated that an elementary school site would be required within the
Neighbourhood.
In order to minimize the need for public facilities in this area of limited developable lands,
a population target of 1,600 people will be retained, with a maximum of 550 people on
lands developed west of Petticoat Creek, which contribute to the Woodview Avenue
sanitary sewer.
At Council's discretion, the population target may be exceeded if the City, in consultation
with the Durham District School Board, is satisfied that existing development, or proposed
development, does not generate the need for additional school facilities within the
Neighbourhood (which would be in addition to the site required by the Durham Catholic
District School Board, see section N1.9.5).
The population target of 550 people west of Petticoat Creek may be exceeded if the City
and Region are satisfied that alternative servicing arrangements are feasible and appropriate.
This may include a direct connection to the York-Durham Trunk Sewer via a privately
owned and operated sewage pumping facility."
ATTACHMENT ,~. ., . TO
A c/ J t' ",i",., REPORT I PO :::>;) - c ).
Planning Committee Meeting Minutes
Monday, December 9, 2002
7:30 p.m.
Chair: Councillor Holland
26
w
ADOPTION OF MINUTES
Meeting of October 15, 2002
ill)
1.
MATTERS FOR CONSI!2.5.BA TIO~
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT PD 52-02
OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION OPA 02-001/P
CITY INITIATED: ROUGE PARK NEIGHBOURHOOD STUDY
IMPLEMENTATION
Referred to the January
2õ1h, 2003- Council Meetina
1. Gary Daniell, 1979 Woodview Ave., advised that the line identifying open
space cuts through his property, severing approximately a third of his land.
He further stated that no field study has been done on his property and it
. should not be restricted in any way. He requested that his land be exempt
from the wildlife corridor.
2. Jocelyn Barber, 450 Finch Ave., requested a meeting with Planning staff to
discuss various matters. She stated her concurrence with Mr. Daniell's
comments and her objection to the policy requirement for a road connection
running from the north side of Finch Avenue to the west side of Rosebank
Road and requested it be deleted or deferred for a month until her Plan of
Subdivision could be addressed. She requested Council delay their decision
until January.
3. Otto Stock, 1960 Wood view Avenue, stated his concern with the property to
the north of him being added as a woodlot and also that the buffer zone will
be so large that he won't be able to develop his land.
- 1 -
27
õñsê,RŸåN iío n
for The Living CitJ{ ATTACHMENT# :J., TO
AIIJt';jú"" REPORT II PO .T)c) -0;)...
December 16, 2002
In~l)
I-,
In'~'!1
I /I i'" -, '"
U U Ut.t:
n~~{ñ]
f\ '~ ¡III
f I' I ,.
I." "., J' ,I
¡WI
'----'
("IT",," 0"" .
.",",t6. . ¡- , ',..t(1~-¡c.1>¡Nti::!
""'~¡"u u
PICKeRING, Of\!TÃi:UO
Mr Steve Gaunt
City of Pickering
Pickering Civic Centre
One The Esplanade
Pickering, Ontario
L1V 6K7
Dear Mr. Gaunt:
Re:
Proposed Residential Lot
Southeast of Woodview and Finch Ave
City of Pickering
(Kaitlin)
Further to our site visit and after review of the TRCA's mapping for the subject property please
accept the following comments.
A review shows plans to modify the open space limits being established through a secondary
plan for the Rouge Park Neighbourhood. At our site walk we defined the limits of the features
and can confirm that the limits of open space envisioned for the property does not represent
the limits of natural features on the subject lands. We would have no objections to revised
open space limits consistent with the limits defined in the field by TRCA's biologist, Dena
Lewis.
In addition, we understand that the applicant has plans to sever the subject property to create
in excess of two residential lots. At that time the TRCA will be requesting that the open space
lands be identified as a separate block and transferred to public ownership. We may also
require supporting technical studies to confirm any new lot lines. We advise that the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management requires that new lots be established a minimum 10
metres from the limits of natural features.
We trust that this is satisfactory. If you have any questions contact the undersigned at ext.
5306.
Your~~.~ruly, "
,;1"', / >'
/i I, Ii L
,::-- L/l/ { P
¡,Russel Whiter-~ '
Senior Planner
Development Services Section
Ext. 5306
RW/dli
F:\PRS\PU BUC\ woodview. wpd
5 5horeham Drive, Downsview, Ontario M3N 154 (416) 661-6600 FAX 661-6898 www.trca.on .ca
~§"~
"OM' .
,..-,
ATTACHMENT'::; TO
A c/ de i;r:l4'A, REPORT # PO S ;t ~ 0 d-..
28
January 10, 2003
Mr steve Gaunt
City of Pickering
Planning Department
Pickering Civic Centre
One The Esplanade
Pickering, Ontario
Ll V 6K7
Dear Mr. Gaunt:
Re:
1960 and 1968 Woodview
Rouge Park Neighbourhood
City of Pickering
Further to our site walk with Dena Lewis and after review of your letter dated January 9th,
2003, please accept the following comments.
At our site walk it was determined that the front portion of 1968 Woodview is occupied by
a single residence while the rear portion appears to be well vegetated and forms part of
a wetland feature. The lands are currently owned by the Ontario Realty Corporation. In
our review of the Rouge Park Neighbourhood study it was also determined that this
property could serve as a critical link to natural features on the eastern side of Woodview
Avenue and the Petticoat Creek. Therefore we continue to support the open space
designation on this property.
1960 Woodview is to the south and is developed as a single family lot with a manicured
rear yard. This area has historically been filled and while the stability of the material is not
known, essentially this property has been removed from the wetland. As part of any
future development application on this property, TRCA staff will require an Environmental
Impact study to determine the extent of buffering which would be required from the
wetland. In our analysis we would consider the current use on 1968 Woodview in
determining the appropriate buffer on 1960 Woodview and would expect that a
minimum buffer would be required at the front portion of the property and adjacent to
the existing single family residence.
We trust that this is satisfactory. If you have any questions please contact the
undersigned.
Yours truly,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
Russel White
Senior Planner
Development Services Section
Ext. 5306
2n
;" /.J. 1 (¡
- .T_L,--,--,
Adder') I.III? hêhJt1' iJ PU 5¿.¡. - () d--
/1 '
" /,
: (2~j þf¡-:-¡!;jj,;/¿¡}~!k)
,./ U'/t.ß ¿,
/1 ' '-" /) /), ~' I ! ~'" /,,?
.,"--,,",,'1,'; ~. 11",'-"',/ - /J",',,"/ ,r, ",,/',,)ì";'
/",,:_',¡-r,~' ,/ ,f /;",/[,./,"', ,,""1 --/'/j l, "ß,,"'j'
/?~".~,.t'!tLJ.t"1'/l, ,( t/,,';!¡,/~,,---~~" ',"'}'>~~"'- ,/,I~;¿?7/;f?~,l:/,;Ø"t'.¿" -e__",',-PiL"",,/,;;;,tf7:,/"',, "",
- j '-- ,"¥ " /1>..' ,'~"., I' '
i1}¿)!¡..?>~ ¿~~a ) 1\ fK.{¿fé~:-::4k";:!_j ?:.íþ~~Z~-{)!~é~#i1(~4:Ç;~
;I}.' '~. ';~.:'" (,--:;í.Z,~-/!-j ¿: (,/ / --"~r;q'/
:'../"'l'--:;Vl <1:2.,-(,"'/ ¿/'l,~'>'::¿,,¿'-;~'1'> ,--"R,? /¿~ð'J< ,/ ,/ /
:f --- W /' " '" -,j , "~ ',.-- /~-) -' u.' j" t.(?'~»", ,-:::,:~:/
1 ' /,' /' //;1 ¡, ï " /' / /' , /!/J AÁ 1.,/ ,/' ~t!:..__/'"
/Y;,/" 7"r;?7",¿":'I.,,(7',,,/5'!/;A,','~,'/L:,'.' , 'C/y.",//W/""", ø, .,~,7,,/!' <- ¿"d,'" t/',:,h","'<"-,",'",;r;;'P"",,",
/¡ I /(I/(~~/ç/ l'j/y(/',/!:;¡P '>~"~:/(/'t/.¿ (.../ / ..' " ':t:;¡/ ", c.-' " Ð '~-" i~ ., //
'~if"",,'" /~, 77ß, JIr"",'l, /', "',~/, """"~(/ /,', ,J~) ., <",.:,','í¡<t¡l',,', "":b,, , ,', ""c' "', ,1),.,,', {J/<.;, ,,'t::¿j~/; ):?'!L-, /')b(¿;~, ' '(::':"I'~'-:[~tjf)
, ' (,Þ', '..,/, /' 'u 1./., &"t-./:.1' '/ ~f , .. t'L,,- - .. '-'
"'I" , / ~e: 1'1 'y,' ,'/ .< f.. ,-=~ fÆ "
~:', ¿";:_,'"'/,,.' l',y', ¿"'~"",- .. ..
" .. - ?' Ÿ L" '-" c...-' c
,/1 ,I /"'" >},~p O,'?, /J--#-:-;:,//J', "','" '~,,'i /: ---",' -",!?,li~,../;z:z"/"""çt;/,,, /.,~~~?'/. P",,¿r;:':;1:k, iZi~' ./ "",ø,~, ,//,/
:?'./'I-1"'/~d ur~ '-c~ , ir - t:- /G /'/7 ;7 ",,~, ' ,,'" ~"'""
"n//" .. L -¡ ;tt; ~ I, ..-../ '/ r./ --"" 'Æ'
"", , l /," /-,;:: ~ .::..--- j -'f1Ø~
n'",')/J, ',',"",,""',""1lj /.,'1""',:,"""'fti:~.,,,,,J,?/'" ~""'/.¡,¡",,,"/I![,.../ I/, -,¡¡r¿'Þ'",,"","'A~',~"'" ,~" ~~",,',:/,,'" '/)'~',.."",/
T~/~j~' ,/i:. {,./, '" '4U/ ;:/, /
'J,', " " -'" ~..,~ / '~t / ,/, L /. 'J:tt/A~" " ,', /: tð:',' .¿¿ :,W-P~ " ' ,
~ 4r~~// / ....-rU/l /?!/ý!,,;/ £¿...t "', (..,- V, ,"'- "" ./ ...-:T
,íj!';~~;'-' i....<';..,~~' (.. t. : 1 ,r I ." '
,/ ,'i ',~"",? .:,-
"".',-4" A~, <,~) "",1, ,//~.. ,7 .or'",,'
"'/."',lUJ i-,""",'?,"",4!t'£l""'.'¡¿".,,:::4f::"-::",'',.,'",'.",', .", ,i../~1tï"Ø1"";"'/,,,::' ~,' ,'(/'",',-""'~':"", "'."/I"",¿'...-:i.,..~"'E..t~','",,,.,',-'~/"'W'"~~,-'{J~"~,P,"~,_J¿¿,O~,'~, ,/
1;1.", '~!Ii ,1'1 ,I ) , / , .. :¡, ~f!tt,
,It,,.i, ,I /1f?,j,-';;'/JI "",' ,,/ I"; ,.-:'_/J f .> ¡
, ,( " '/ "i,//& /, :;k"(""¿"'-J r../::.I' 'J .' ~........~ - t.-- .'
i"'-"'!.~J:: ,.-.. ,,""", -¡ ,..." """ ""
~/:f<,r.A,"'.p/?"/,, t",""", ~,7./,h",~%, 1(/7_h,', ' '/~ ~~~;7""2'1.//:;..Pl,,"/,,,....-7.,""""",'V(7./"'--:;1J' )';.,,". ,~/,/":;;,;',,,/;l¿7~.J!>/'-
/,/"/ '1'¡(~; /' --c:¿ /'.... -- t:..P' ~4:f/r - c//f'Z/y;;d;Z"éit2'; P-~~,IÆ "-""-,,,,,,-",-- '-"
/tftØtb;::<://,;" 7/ ,,~ ¡ +', OJ /";?/ ,~,~. ¡)
" """"'""',",,,, /Ý;,YY, ',¡f"I,;'I'~ Þ,""'" //j/"Jf.Z:/fÞ!/Z¡',.,,-,,¿," ,(Íj!.,-,¿,il-;" :",~C:¿~,-"",~""",,'1",',"',c., :'~""~,--,~,',:'~;',j.','~ ,~d!,"'~..-t.' ",/,/~.",,-{,I',¿,'<-'/.-,',' ',,-/;~,' ¡;".. ~,',,'t1,', ',.i"', 'f,'
.. //l/t~"Ui ¡I,", f~/ ~' fA, "é"'~'~,
/j,,< ',117,"'f,,~, ~,"1L/""V_;¡-1í""",,'Yf"'~',II/;~',,/,'Jh'", ',',,:L~,¡'_',,'7,,{J!t;"ß.,;t,':~ ",7',7"~,"'7"',".I'/~,,"",'/}';,7d,,"l,""',"i,' ",",",-', ~~"ú2¡!.;~/""-,,,',.,,:,','1f4,f/I.,&..I.r;/
.~ "'1'19"'1..:.<--", .?'" ;', ' !J$ .. ~,.. ,
" 'j..., ", ';1" ~-9 /"" /,1,,/1
Á2j;U 7/, ,7 /c.¿¿/)1'- ¿;~/) ~'/Ld ~, " ì' ~, Z, ,;' " 'v.~, ¿,ul-/
"'~,þ/ ",~~v1«./~)J-". ,'J/LJ/ ',,1' l ~,.. ,-: ~ ' ':J
11'"';';'4/,, -' ',,/ 'Y/7., ",f,,~, ~/ ¿P.:.pJ ~, "~~~. ,..""--4," -,',,<.. //?R', ~/),h/"",7 Æ '\2.-~', "', /
f ~¿..., '-Z';/',~'..., I "r < fVs""V-- /!./'lL" "/ t/f.d/~ç:;..... W;::......../
I.,' ,',.. "'1' ,', ,l,.."~7("'Jw .f" - ,.~', ,""'. ," "",
4'J'd //;J,/~~ ;;Þ~;~ ~
,-1.~"" ,k~;t?¡ /'~.. ",/ /" ,~, ~/ ".';
/; , ' " ,; """"""'/ /, 6' ,1 "4/'; , ,.
/U':u.~~. ',' ¡;r¿r , /l v?ý':// ~ " ~.~J:~" "tQ/,:øÎ/-,,' ~~' .,/':a, , /~~,( "*,/.~" ..././ / ~./ / ,
/ ,77, /.. ~ ," " "Þ' , r . . ....-vV c-c..é4 ..
, ,-../~.,,/J" ~ ~)..~> /.(/ .'1".. ,I., "..~. -<~..- ,,", .,.,J ~'
//¿'r:i/l"",,"/\~, 1 ~"",¥--,."",~r-¿;""",~,,~,,:; "'1Jtl!/¿~,"',.~,"!~',,"~,'~,,/,,""'¿"'--':7¡g¿ ",;/"""" ',',~",'.'\~,",),,""/'~~:é;¿i~~
/1t1rJ .' 4'v ..d~/,;;ø W / ~/ ~~// f<;' ~ ".//.t.O 4.1) . ,/ <11 /
-C:'ð ~ '!./A-w;::ø;?:U.:t# 'C:~ ¿£...Z:-/;i.4f::/'¿:A~ ,~yþ¿'" (~Z~ÝX;"""'-
/~},..¿;1 ./1~>~ 'y-/ A, ,,~ ,,', /~"'.
(þ- /4,' ('í1!',..:-¿ý'",,~ .c:.. ," ..,/ "/:/'¿~,,'.'a)L-A " ,/. , -~/: ,f ,;"r7, , ,"~" ""J, ~~', ", "", " -:1
/ f" .... .. U,"', ~ './..""~"!'I'~ // .-,'"
':';'' ,r f, "-, ",""", -- .. "",',-- !..--,
""'/, ;,'l'¡"¡l."l~'l" ;-;::::17:, /.. ~~,", ','~",:"', U ./ 44. F tlJ--7/!~"" ~,l -,:24~t " ;¿;Z;J~~:f:~2} //, :::;
j ,¡f)'-"" ';'1.".' , ,.,' .,"" -" ~
¡~ ,......././;f!,- .14 fIØ, /1/ì-Øí "" , "~'
" \,-//lø;y/..¿:.¿/ //:,;/' .. "t//,.,/ ",. ~,,/',--/V.,' A!'~' ~/. ,'.,', ,,/".?-": '",'
' / t.ø. þ'/ '/ .. 4' ~ ", U' I
.. ,',,' '\'--¿" """, " -c./ ..
- ". /'./.. ,/
.. ,,:' .. ~---' ""'-)
R:, ECE~,j\,'E, n,'"l" , ?"",'^-,""!4J"¡ ','""t?~""',1",,?,"/,"
, ~.. I!.J' /,f'> l' ':JI'~Y/ /'A"'] ,
"'¡PA'..<'7 '1/ ./ /~I-.L---
-,--Y/:,'"YiV,'" ;:/<1,.£1,/"" ,,' ""F /, ..
C:"'?)j' ,; ~:; :;:'~
rj /,,/ " 7::;r/"j..
^i¿ff,:/,..y , ,.:" ", ," '
-,J ,/11 \j' ç.,.".~"" .,':;:;"":..-'7 '-::;> )
j, tx... "" /'1'):;", "'-" ,J' [:;>( ,~ ,/
/ /" / /' \ '...' L, --.., ,.
0 (J 20m
CITY OF PICKERiNG
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
OEP/\RTMENT