Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD 52-02 (Addendum) REPORT TO COUNCIL 09 Addendum to Report Number: PO 52-02 Date: January 10, 2003 From: Neil Carroll Director, Planning & Development Subject: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 02-001/P City Initiated: Rouge Park Neighbourhood Study Implementation City of Pickering Recommendation: 1. That Addendum to Report Number PO 52-02, concerning the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Study implementation, be received; 2. (a) (b) 3. That Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 02-001/P, initiated by the City of Pickering, to implement the results of the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Study, as follows: . revise Schedule I - land Use Structure to adjust the boundaries of the Urban Residential and Open Space designations; revise Schedule III - Resource Management to adjust the boundaries of the Shoreline and Stream Corridor, Wetlands and Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor designations; revise the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor Policies; and revise the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Policies; . . . be APPROVED, as revised, as set out in Appendix I to Addendum to Report Number PO 52-02; That the draft by-law to adopt Amendment 11 to the Pickering Official Plan be ENACTED by Council, as set out in Appendix I to Addendum to Report Number PO 52-02. That Amendment 1 to the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Development Guidelines be ADOPTED by Council, as set out in Appendix /I to Addendum to Report Number PD 52-02. Executive Summary: Revised land use and resource management designations are proposed for one property following consideration of the comments made by three local residents at the Planning Committee meeting held December 9, 2002. Planning Committee referred the proposed amendment to Council for consideration at its meeting scheduled for January 20, 2003, so that staff could address the concerns of several residents. 1 0 Addendum to Report PO 52-02 Date: January 10, 2002 Subject: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 02-001/P Page 2 Staff from the City and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, following a site visit, support minor revisions to the land use and resource management designations for the Daniell's property, and have clarified that only minimal buffering from the adjacent wildlife corridor is required when the Stock property is redeveloped. City Staff has discussed a broad range of concerns with the third resident (Barber) and is not recommending deletion of the required road connection from the Official Plan amendment. Staff recommend that Council adopt Official Plan Amendment 11 and Amendment 1 to the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Development Guidelines as set out in Appendices I and II of Addendum to Report Number 52-02 in order to complete its consideration of the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Study. Amendment 11 includes the minor revisions to land use and resource management designations referred to in the previous paragraph. Financial Implications: Not Applicable. 1.0 Background: On December 9, 2002, Planning Committee referred the recommendations in Report Number 52-02 to the January 20, 2003 Council meeting (see Attachment #1) so that staff could respond to the concerns expressed by three residents and the written comment submitted at the Planning Committee meeting. 1.1 Minor Revisions to Designations in the Amendment in Response to Mr. Daniell's Comments Mr. Daniell commented that the Open Space land use and Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor resource management designations proposed for the southern third of the property at 1979 Woodview Avenue would remove approximately a third of the development capacity from his lands. A site visit was conducted with the City planner, the TRCA planner, the TRCA biologist and Mr. Daniell present. TRCA staff advised that the Open Space designation proposed does not represent the limits of the natural features on the subject lands, as defined by TRCA's biologist (see Attachment #2). TRCA also advised that the open space lands should be transferred to public ownership when new lots are created on the property and the lots should be set back a minimum of 10 metres from the limits of the natural features. A copy of the TRCA comments will be retained on file in the Department to guide consideration of future development proposals for Mr. Daniell's property. Accordingly, the Open Space - Natural Area designation on Schedule I - land Use Structure should be removed from the front part of the southern third of the property and added to the rear third of the entire property to properly reflect the existing natural features on the property. Addendum to Report PD 52-02 Date: January 10, 2002 11 Subject: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 02-001/P Page 3 In addition, the Wetland and Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor designations on Schedule III - Resource Management should be revised to conform to this Open Space - Natural Area designation. Schedule 'A' - land Use Structure and Schedules 'B' and 'C' (amending the Resource Management Schedule) of proposed Official Plan Amendment 11 have been revised, as set out in Appendix I to Addendum to Report Number 52-02. 1.2 Need For Only A Minimal Buffer Confirmed In Response To Mr. Stock's Concerns Mr. Stock expressed concern with the proposed redesignation of the front part of an Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC) property at 1968 Woodview Avenue, which is the property immediately north of Mr. Stock's property (1960 Woodview Avenue). Mr. Stock was concerned that the proposed redesignation to Open Space and Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor would require his property to incorporate such a large buffer zone that it would become undevelopable. The City planner, the TRCA planner and the TRCA biologist also conducted a site visit of 1968 Woodview when Mr. Daniell's property was evaluated. TRCA staff advise that since the rear part of the property is wetland, the front part of the property is naturally vegetated, and the lands to the east of Woodview Avenue are occupied by naturally vegetated wetland, the ORC property serves as a natural corridor for wetland species and should be designated as Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor and Open Space - Natural Area in the Pickering Official Plan. These designations are consistent with the recommendations contained in the Environmental Master Servicing Plan for the Rouge Park Neighbourhood and the Rouge Park Development Guidelines, which were previously endorsed by Council in April, 2000, and supported by the ORC, the owner of the property. TRCA staff have also advised that since the front part of the ORC property north of Mr. Stock's property is somewhat disturbed, (there is a house and a raised septic bed), the buffering required for any redevelopment on Mr. Stock's property can be minimal (see Attachment #3). The Planning & Development Department has provided Mr. Stock with a letter stating that minimal buffering of possible future residential development on the front part of Mr. Stock's property, from the property to the north, is supported by both TRCA and the Department. A copy of the letter will be retained on file in the Department to guide the future consideration of development proposals for Mr. Stock's property. 1.3 No Deletion of Policy Requiring Road Connection Despite Comments of Mrs. Barber At the Planning Committee meeting, Ms. Barber requested deletion of the policy requirement for a road connection from the north side of Finch Avenue to the west side of Rosebank Road and requested a delay to allow her to meet with Planning staff to discuss various matters. 12 Addendum to Report PO 52-02 Date: January 10, 2002 Subject: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 02-001/P Page 4 Planning & Development staff met with Ms. Barber on January 9, 2003, and discussed her concerns, which were similar to the concerns raised in her letter submitted following the Statutory Public Information Meeting held in June 2002. Ms. Barber's concerns were reviewed in greater detail than was done in the staff responses contained in Table 1 - Summary of Comments Received and Staff Responses On Proposed Official Plan Amendment 11, which is Attachment #13 to Report Number 52-02. As a result, it is not recommended that policy 11.16 (v), which requires a road connection from the north side of Finch Avenue to the west side of Rosebank Road, be amended at this time. A minor clarification to proposed policy 10.17(e) (Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor) was agreed on and is reflected in Amendment 11 in Appendix I to Addendum to Report Number 52-02. 1.4 No Additional Protection Proposed for the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor Despite Comment of Ms. James Ms. James submitted a letter dated December 9, 2002, to Planning Committee requesting an extra effort be made to protect the wildlife corridor between Rouge Park and the Altona Forest in order to encourage the best possible survival of wildlife habitat and species (see Attachment #4). Staff consider that the policies and designations proposed in Official Plan Amendment 11 balance the needs for both private development and for protection of wetlands and the wildlife corridor within the Rouge Park Neighbourhood. TRCA is supportive of the proposed amendment. Conclusion: Following review of the concerns expressed at the Planning Committee meeting held December 9, 2002, it is recommended that Council implement the final aspect of the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Study by enactment and adoption respectively of Official Plan Amendment 11 and Amendment 1 to the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Development Guidelines as set out in the Appendices to this Addendum to Report Number 52-02. Appendices APPENDIX I: By-law to adopt Amendment No, 11 to the Pickering Official Plan for the Rouge Park Neighbourhood (Amendment included as Exhibit lA' to By-law) Amendment 1 to the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Development Guidelines APPENDIX II: Addendum to Report PD 52-02 Date: January 10, 2002 13 Subject: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 02-001/P Page 5 Attachments: 1. 2. 3. 4. Planning Committee Meeting Minutes for December 9, 2002 Comments of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, dated December 16, 2002 Comments of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, dated January 10, 2003 Letter from Lois James dated December 9, 2002 Prepared By: Approved I Endorsed By: .~ 1Þ?~3- Steve Gaunt, MC/P, RPP Planner II ,," Neil Carroll, Director, PIa' (jd-~ ì i&- Catherine Rose Manager, Policy SG:jf Attachments Copy: Chief Administrative Officer Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council 14 APPENDIX I TO ADDENDUM TO REPORT NUMBER PD 52-02 BY-LAW TO ADOPT OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT 11 TO THE PICKERING OFFICIAL PLAN THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PICKERING 15 BY-lAW NO. DRAFT Being a By-law to adopt Amendment 11 to the Official Plan for the City of Pickering. (OPA 02-001/P); WHEREAS pursuant to the Planning Act, RS.O. 1990, chapter 13, subsections 17(22) and 21 (1), the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering may by by-law adopt amendments to the Official Plan for the City of Pickering; AND WHEREAS pursuant to Section 17(10) of the Planning Act, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing has by order authorized Regional Council to pass a by-law to exempt proposed area municipal official plan amendments from its approval; AND WHEREAS, the Region has advised that this Amendment is NOT exempt from Regional approval; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCil OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CI1Y OF PICKERING HEREBY ENACTS AS FOllOWS: 1. That Amendment 11 to the Official Plan for the City of Pickering, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", is hereby adopted; 2. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward to the Regional Municipality of Durham the documentation required by Procedure: Area Municipal Official Plans and Amendments, to seek Regional approval of an Amendment to the Pickering Official Plan; 3. This By-law shall come into force and take effect on the day of the final passing hereof. BY-lAW read a first, second and third time and finally passed this January, 2003. day of Wayne Mhu rs, ~~ Bruce Taylor, Clerk 16 Exhibit "A" to By-law AMENDMENT 11 TO TH E CITY OF PICKERING OFFICIAL PLAN 17 AMENDMENT 11 TO THE CITY OF PICKERING OFFICIAL PLAN PURPOSE: The purpose of the amendment is to revise the boundaries of residential and open space designations on Schedule I - Land Use Structure, revise the boundaries of Wetlands, the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor and Shorelines and Stream Corridors on Schedule III - Resource Management, revise the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor policies and revise the Rouge Park Neighbourhood policies to implement the results of the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Study. LOCATION: The amendment affects all lands in the Rouge Park Neighbourhood, which is located on the west side of Pickering at the northern limit of the City's South Urban Area. This area is approximately 160 hectares in size. BASIS: The Rouge Park Neighbourhood Study was completed for lands in the City of Pickering and received by City Council in April 2000. City Council adopted a comprehensive plan to guide future development of the neighbourhood through two principal documents: the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Environmental Master Servicing Plan and the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Development Guidelines. The Environmental Master Servicing Plan provided direction on edge management strategies between developable and non-developable areas to ensure that new development maintains and enhances adjacent natural features and functions. It also established a stormwater management strategy. The Rouge Park Neighbourhood Development Guidelines established urban design criteria and identified school and park sites and major street connections. The Land Use objectives for this amendment are to adjust the boundaries of the land use designations to accurately reflect the findings of the Environmental Master Servicing Plan and adopt policies for both the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor and the Rouge Park Neighbourhood that will guide development in the manner articulated in the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Development Guidelines. Wetland boundaries shown on the amended Resource Management schedule are based on updated 1999 mapping from the Ministry of Natural Resources. 18 Appendix 1 to Addendum to Report PO 52-02 Page 2 Amendment 11 to the Pickerinq Official Plan - Amendment to By-law to Adopt Official Plan ACTUAL AMENDMENT: 1. 2. 3. Council of the City of Pickering passed resolution #29/00, Item #1, at its meeting of April 10, 2000, which included initiating this proposed amendment to the Pickering Official Plan to implement the results of the Rouge Park Neighbourhood Study and a number of other associated recommendations. The proposed amendment has been prepared considering comments received at the Statutory Public Information meeting held on June 19,2002. The Pickering Official Plan be amended by: Revising Schedule I - Land Use Structure to revise the boundary between the designations of Open Space System - Natural Area and Urban Residential Areas - Low Density Areas for certain lands in the Rouge Park N eighbourhood, as set out on Schedule 'N; Revising Schedule III - Resource Management Schedule, to: (i) revise the delineation of Wetlands in the Rouge Park Neighbourhood, as set out on Schedule 'ß'; revise the delineation of the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor, as set out on Schedule 'C'; and revise the delineation of Shorelines and Stream Corridors, as set out on Schedule 'D'; (ii) (iii) Revising section 10.17 - Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor Policies, to add a policy limiting the uses permitted on lands that are designated both Freeways and Major Utilities - Potential Multi-Use Area and Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor; and add a policy encouraging the preparation of a "Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor Management Plan" such that section 10.17 reads as follows: CITY POLICY Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor 10.17 City Council recognizes that the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor is intended to function as a significant vegetated connector providing for species migration between the Rouge and Duffins valley systems; accordingly, Council shall, Appendix 1 to Addendum to Report PO 52-02 Page 3 19 Amendment 11 to the Pickerinq Official Plan - Amendment to By-law to Adopt Official Plan (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) despite the permissible uses listed in Table 13*, permit utility and ancillary uses, as well as any uses permissible within the Open Space System - Natural Area designation (see Table 3) on lands designated both Freeways and Major Utilities - Potential Multi-Use Area on Schedule I and also Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor on Schedule III; and, encourage the Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto & Region Conservation Authority, Region of Durham, Ontario Hydro and interested others to both prepare a "Rouge-Duffins Wildlife Corridor Management Plan" and establish funding for on-going maintenance and restoration of the Corridor. Replacing section 11.16 - Rouge Park Neighbourhood Policies to revise subsections 11.16 (a)(i), (a)(iv) and (d); such that the entire section 11.16 reads as follows: 4. CITY POLICY Rouge Park Neighbourhood Policies 11.16 (a) City Council shall, in the consideration of development proposed within the neighbourhood, (i) discourage designs which require the use of reverse frontages, berms and significant noise attenuation fencing adjacent to Finch Avenue and Altona Road, unless justified for a limited proportion of street frontage within any proposed development by unique site configuration, road access or proximity considerations and mitigated by special design and/or landscaping features; * A copy of Table 13 is provided for reference at the end of this Amendment. constitute part of the Amendment. It does not 20 Appendix 1 to Addendum to Report PO 52-02 Page 4 Amendment 11 to the Pickerinq Official Plan - Amendment to By-law to Adopt Official Plan (ii) encourage a "neighbourhood focus" at the intersection of Finch Avenue and Altona Road through the utilization of structural massing, architectural elements, and landscaping that establishes a strong relationship with the intersection; (iii) despite the permissible uses listed in Tables 5* and 9*, not permit the establishment of automobile service stations and drive-thru facilities such as restaurants, banks and convenience stores within the neighbourhood; in accordance with sections 15.17 and 15.18, permit the use of density transfers and bonuses, as further detailed in the Rouge Park N eighbourhood Development Guidelines; require a road connection running from the north side of Finch Avenue to the west side of Rosebank Road; require new development to have regard for the Rouge Park Management Plan; encourage the retention of environmentally sensitive Provincially-owned lands within public ownership and the appropriate and timely disposition of Provincially- owned lands outside of the Rouge Park that are not environmentally sensitive; endeavour to eliminate the "jog" at the Rosebank Road and Finch Avenue intersection; support improvements to the level crossings of the C.P. rail line at the Scarborough-Pickering Townline Road and Rosebank Road, such as the installation of appropriate safety measures including automatic safety gates; and for the north-east corner of the Beare Estate/Map Realty lands, located on the north side of Finch Avenue, opposite Woodview Avenue, interpret the minimum extent of the "Open Space System - Natural Areas" designation to be the southerly drip-line of the existing hedgerow plus 1 metre, with the maximum extent to be determined during the review of the related development applications. ** (iv) (v) (vi) (b) (c) (d) (e) * Copies of Tables 5 and 9 of Chapter 3 are provided for reference at the end of this Amendment. It does not constitute part of the Amendment. ** This clause reflects the order of the Ontario Municipal Board in its disposition of the Beare Estate/Map Realty appeaL Appendix 1 to Addendum to Report PO 52-02 Page 5 21 Amendment 11 to the Pickerinq Official Plan - Amendment to By-law to Adopt Official Plan IMPLEMENTATION: The provisions set forth in the Pickering Official Plan, as amended, regarding the implementation of the Plan shall apply in regard to this Amendment. INTERPRETATION: The provisions set forth in the Pickering Official Plan, as amended, regarding the interpretation of the Plan shall apply in regard to this Amendment. 22 Appendix I to Addendum to Report PO 52-02 Paqe 6 CITY POLICY TABLE 13: Freewqys and Mqjor Utilities: Permissible Uses I¿y Subcategory Utility and ancillary uses; Public or private uses that are compatible with adjacent land uses, comply: with the goals, policies and general intent of this Plan, and do not i adversely affect the operation or use ofthe utility. ¡ ~~:::~;~ ..::~.~~~~~.~~: ~ ~..:: ~~~¡:~ ..~.~~.~.;..::~.. ~.~:~~:~..: ~. ~:~:~~'~'~=~'~'~":~""""l ,.".."......."......."...................";.".......;"";"",,,,..J..~~.~~~~~..~~.~.~.'.........................................................................................................................................................................................i Appendix I to Addendum to Report PO 52-02 Paqe 7 23 CITY POLICY TABLE 5; Mixed Use Areas; Permissible Uses !?J Subcategory Retailing of goods and services generally serving the needs of the surrounding neighbourhoods; Offices and restaurants; Community, cultural and recreational uses. All uses permissible in Local Nodes, at a larger scale and intensity, and serving a broader area. All uses permissible in Local Nodes and Community Nodes, at a scale and intensity equivalent to Community Nodes; Special purpose commercial uses. All uses permissible in Local Nodes and Community Nodes, at the greatest scale and intensity in the City, serving City-wide and regional levels; Special purpose commercial uses. CITY POLICY TABLE 9; Urban Residential Areas; Permissible Uses Residential uses, home occupations, limited offices serving the area, and limited retailing of goods and services serving the area; Community, cultural and recreational uses; Compatible employment uses, and compatible special purpose commercial uses serving the area. REVISED SCHEDULE W TO AMENDMENT 11 REDESIGNATE FROM 'OPEN SPACE SYSTEM-NATURAL AREAS" TO 'URBAN RESIDENTIAL AREAS-lOW DENSITY AREAS' /NTE ------ SCHEDULE ITO THE PICKERING OFFICIAL PLAN OPEN ~:: ::;:M w¿¡ ~ RECREATIONAL ~ MARINA AREAS m; ,- I -. MIXED USE AREAS . LOCAL NODES . COMMUNITY NODES . MIXED CORRIDORS . DOWN1UWN CORE COY '" ....-.- =-=- -~~:::;;.~= "'- REGIONAL NODES . REGIONAL NODE 1 . REGIONAL NODE 2 0 <{ 0 ü:: 0 <:( 0 ü:: .. lAND USE STRUcruRE EMPLOYMENT AREAS FREEWAYS AND MAJOR UTlUTlES 0 GENERAL EMPLOYMENT. POTENTIAL MULTI-USE AREAS IJII PRESTIGE EMPLOYMENT III CONTROLLED ACCESS AREAS Ë3 M'XED EMPt.OYMENT OTHER DESIGNATIONS URBAN RESIDENTIAL AREAS . URBAN STUDY AREAS lOW DENSITY AREAS SEATON URBAN STUDY AREA w¿¡ MEDIUM DENSITY AREAS AGRICULruRAL AREAS ~ HIGH DENSIlY AREAS I D11 DEFERRALS RURAL SETTLEMENTS . RURAL CLUSTERS . RURAL """LETS J , \ \ , I \ , , ""'-' "~'I \ , I, I \ \ , , , , , ,-'-'-) , \ 0, I 'Á I { - ..J "'" « : ..J "'---- 0 I r 0 ' /-~ rv I \ LL rv I , LL I -, I " \ ,-, , \ \ I I I / I \ ROUGE PARK -\tIEIGHBOURHOOD \ \ , , J " <' ~ I " ,-'..1 + + SCHEDULE m TO THE PICKERING 0 FFI CIAL PLAN ~-:-:-:-~ IJ]]]] SHOREUNES AND STREAM CORRIDORS <MAY INCLUDE HAZARD lANDS) WETlANDS ENVIRONUrnl"ALLY SIGNIFICANT AREAS 0 ROUGE-DUFFINS WlLDUFE CORRIDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FORUER LAKE IROQUOIS SHOREUNE IUIII ALTONA FOREST POUCY AREA FLOOD PlAIN SPECIAL POUCY AREAS ROUGE PARK BOUNDARY AREAS OF NATURAL AND SCIENTIfIC INTEREST . KNOWN WASTE DISPOSAL SITES ...-F~- 1\ ------.------ -----------_. " --~ I \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ "'" --'-, \ \ < (, f \ \ .. \ --'-'-) \ ' \ , .--' ,--'" REVISED SCHEDULE 'C' TO AMENDMENT 11 0, \ I I ' ./f' I -.J'" <{ : J "'---- 0 0, r ; /-" rv I \ u- rv I , u-' I -, I " \ ,-, \ \ I I + + SCHEDULE m TO THE PICKERING OFFICIAL PLAN 0 IJIIII]] SHOREUNES AND STREAM CORRIDORS (MAY INCUJDE HAZARD lANDS) WETlANDS ENVIRONMENTAlLY SIGNIFICANT AREAS r++l ~ ROUGE-DUFF1NS WILDLIFE CORRIDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FORMER lAKE IROQUOIS SHOREUNE 111111 ALTONA FOREST POLICY AREA FLOOD PlAIN SPECIAL POUCY AREAS ROUGE PARK BOUNDARY AREAS OF NAlURAL AND SCI£>lT1FIC INTEREST . KNOWN WASTE DISPOSAL SITES ---o~~- "^ ------.------ I' -----------_. " -~ ORIGINAL SCHEDULE 10' TO AMENDMENT 11 0 ¡ I ' <1: <1: ! j-',,---_J 0 0, r i (-~ (t rv I , L1- I I -, I ",j , \ I I I I / I \ ROUGE PARK -\-NEIGHBOURHOOD \ \ , \ J " <' ~ ì / r- r~';; I , \ I , I \ \ , ""'-- '-,\ \ < (, J \ \ \ .-,- \ ~-' ~ , .--' .f '----' ì \ '( ,) I.., } ENBRIDG' + + SCHEDULE m TO THE PI CKERIN G OFFICIAL PLAN ~-:-:-:-~ nmrn SHOREUNES AND STREAM CORRIDORS (MAY INCWDE HAZARD LANDS) WETLANDS ENVIRONMENTALLY SIGNIFICANT AREAS r++l ~ ROUGE-DUFFINS WlCDUff CORRIDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FORMER LAKE IROQUOIS SHOREUNE lilli' ALTONA FOREST POUCY AREA FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL POUCY AREAS ROUGE PARK BOUNDARY AR<AS OF NATIJRAI.. AND SCtENTIAC INTEREST . KNOWN WASTE DISPOSAL SITES <nY-""""" l' ...---- ----t~_':õ.=---- ___M______-_. " -,-~ AMENDMENT 1 TO THE APPENDIX II TO ADDENDUM TO REPORT NO. PD 52-02 ROUGE PARK NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES 24 25 AMENDMENT 1 TO THE ROUGE PARK NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES ACTUAL AMENDMENT: The Rouge Park Neighbourhood Development Guidelines to be amended by: In accordance with updated sanitary sewer capacities provided to the City during the processing of Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 02- 001/P (now Amendment 11 to the Pickering Official Plan), in Section N1.8 - Neighbourhood Population Targets, replace the number "2200" with "2000", the number "500" with "550" and the number "1700" with "1450", such that Section N1.8 reads as follows: "The Official Plan establishes a population target for the Rouge Park Neighbourhood of 1,600 people. Based solely on the sanitary sewer capacity, a population target of 2,000 people is achievable 550 west of Petticoat Creek, and 1450 east of the creek. However, if the population were to grow much beyond 1,600 people, the Durham District School Board has indicated that an elementary school site would be required within the Neighbourhood. In order to minimize the need for public facilities in this area of limited developable lands, a population target of 1,600 people will be retained, with a maximum of 550 people on lands developed west of Petticoat Creek, which contribute to the Woodview Avenue sanitary sewer. At Council's discretion, the population target may be exceeded if the City, in consultation with the Durham District School Board, is satisfied that existing development, or proposed development, does not generate the need for additional school facilities within the Neighbourhood (which would be in addition to the site required by the Durham Catholic District School Board, see section N1.9.5). The population target of 550 people west of Petticoat Creek may be exceeded if the City and Region are satisfied that alternative servicing arrangements are feasible and appropriate. This may include a direct connection to the York-Durham Trunk Sewer via a privately owned and operated sewage pumping facility." ATTACHMENT ,~. ., . TO A c/ J t' ",i",., REPORT I PO :::>;) - c ). Planning Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, December 9, 2002 7:30 p.m. Chair: Councillor Holland 26 w ADOPTION OF MINUTES Meeting of October 15, 2002 ill) 1. MATTERS FOR CONSI!2.5.BA TIO~ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT PD 52-02 OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION OPA 02-001/P CITY INITIATED: ROUGE PARK NEIGHBOURHOOD STUDY IMPLEMENTATION Referred to the January 2õ1h, 2003- Council Meetina 1. Gary Daniell, 1979 Woodview Ave., advised that the line identifying open space cuts through his property, severing approximately a third of his land. He further stated that no field study has been done on his property and it . should not be restricted in any way. He requested that his land be exempt from the wildlife corridor. 2. Jocelyn Barber, 450 Finch Ave., requested a meeting with Planning staff to discuss various matters. She stated her concurrence with Mr. Daniell's comments and her objection to the policy requirement for a road connection running from the north side of Finch Avenue to the west side of Rosebank Road and requested it be deleted or deferred for a month until her Plan of Subdivision could be addressed. She requested Council delay their decision until January. 3. Otto Stock, 1960 Wood view Avenue, stated his concern with the property to the north of him being added as a woodlot and also that the buffer zone will be so large that he won't be able to develop his land. - 1 - 27 õñsê,RŸåN iío n for The Living CitJ{ ATTACHMENT# :J., TO AIIJt';jú"" REPORT II PO .T)c) -0;)... December 16, 2002 In~l) I-, In'~'!1 I /I i'" -, '" U U Ut.t: n~~{ñ] f\ '~ ¡III f I' I ,. I." "., J' ,I ¡WI '----' ("IT",," 0"" . .",",t6. . ¡- , ',..t(1~-¡c.1>¡Nti::! ""'~¡"u u PICKeRING, Of\!TÃi:UO Mr Steve Gaunt City of Pickering Pickering Civic Centre One The Esplanade Pickering, Ontario L1V 6K7 Dear Mr. Gaunt: Re: Proposed Residential Lot Southeast of Woodview and Finch Ave City of Pickering (Kaitlin) Further to our site visit and after review of the TRCA's mapping for the subject property please accept the following comments. A review shows plans to modify the open space limits being established through a secondary plan for the Rouge Park Neighbourhood. At our site walk we defined the limits of the features and can confirm that the limits of open space envisioned for the property does not represent the limits of natural features on the subject lands. We would have no objections to revised open space limits consistent with the limits defined in the field by TRCA's biologist, Dena Lewis. In addition, we understand that the applicant has plans to sever the subject property to create in excess of two residential lots. At that time the TRCA will be requesting that the open space lands be identified as a separate block and transferred to public ownership. We may also require supporting technical studies to confirm any new lot lines. We advise that the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management requires that new lots be established a minimum 10 metres from the limits of natural features. We trust that this is satisfactory. If you have any questions contact the undersigned at ext. 5306. Your~~.~ruly, " ,;1"', / >' /i I, Ii L ,::-- L/l/ { P ¡,Russel Whiter-~ ' Senior Planner Development Services Section Ext. 5306 RW/dli F:\PRS\PU BUC\ woodview. wpd 5 5horeham Drive, Downsview, Ontario M3N 154 (416) 661-6600 FAX 661-6898 www.trca.on .ca ~§"~ "OM' . ,..-, ATTACHMENT'::; TO A c/ de i;r:l4'A, REPORT # PO S ;t ~ 0 d-.. 28 January 10, 2003 Mr steve Gaunt City of Pickering Planning Department Pickering Civic Centre One The Esplanade Pickering, Ontario Ll V 6K7 Dear Mr. Gaunt: Re: 1960 and 1968 Woodview Rouge Park Neighbourhood City of Pickering Further to our site walk with Dena Lewis and after review of your letter dated January 9th, 2003, please accept the following comments. At our site walk it was determined that the front portion of 1968 Woodview is occupied by a single residence while the rear portion appears to be well vegetated and forms part of a wetland feature. The lands are currently owned by the Ontario Realty Corporation. In our review of the Rouge Park Neighbourhood study it was also determined that this property could serve as a critical link to natural features on the eastern side of Woodview Avenue and the Petticoat Creek. Therefore we continue to support the open space designation on this property. 1960 Woodview is to the south and is developed as a single family lot with a manicured rear yard. This area has historically been filled and while the stability of the material is not known, essentially this property has been removed from the wetland. As part of any future development application on this property, TRCA staff will require an Environmental Impact study to determine the extent of buffering which would be required from the wetland. In our analysis we would consider the current use on 1968 Woodview in determining the appropriate buffer on 1960 Woodview and would expect that a minimum buffer would be required at the front portion of the property and adjacent to the existing single family residence. We trust that this is satisfactory. If you have any questions please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Russel White Senior Planner Development Services Section Ext. 5306 2n ;" /.J. 1 (¡ - .T_L,--,--, Adder') I.III? hêhJt1' iJ PU 5¿.¡. - () d-- /1 ' " /, : (2~j þf¡-:-¡!;jj,;/¿¡}~!k) ,./ U'/t.ß ¿, /1 ' '-" /) /), ~' I ! ~'" /,,? .,"--,,",,'1,'; ~. 11",'-"',/ - /J",',,"/ ,r, ",,/',,)ì";' /",,:_',¡-r,~' ,/ ,f /;",/[,./,"', ,,""1 --/'/j l, "ß,,"'j' /?~".~,.t'!tLJ.t"1'/l, ,( t/,,';!¡,/~,,---~~" ',"'}'>~~"'- ,/,I~;¿?7/;f?~,l:/,;Ø"t'.¿" -e__",',-PiL"",,/,;;;,tf7:,/"',, "", - j '-- ,"¥ " /1>..' ,'~"., I' ' i1}¿)!¡..?>~ ¿~~a ) 1\ fK.{¿fé~:-::4k";:!_j ?:.íþ~~Z~-{)!~é~#i1(~4:Ç;~ ;I}.' '~. ';~.:'" (,--:;í.Z,~-/!-j ¿: (,/ / --"~r;q'/ :'../"'l'--:;Vl <1:2.,-(,"'/ ¿/'l,~'>'::¿,,¿'-;~'1'> ,--"R,? /¿~ð'J< ,/ ,/ / :f --- W /' " '" -,j , "~ ',.-- /~-) -' u.' j" t.(?'~»", ,-:::,:~:/ 1 ' /,' /' //;1 ¡, ï " /' / /' , /!/J AÁ 1.,/ ,/' ~t!:..__/'" /Y;,/" 7"r;?7",¿":'I.,,(7',,,/5'!/;A,','~,'/L:,'.' , 'C/y.",//W/""", ø, .,~,7,,/!' <- ¿"d,'" t/',:,h","'<"-,",'",;r;;'P"",,", /¡ I /(I/(~~/ç/ l'j/y(/',/!:;¡P '>~"~:/(/'t/.¿ (.../ / ..' " ':t:;¡/ ", c.-' " Ð '~-" i~ ., // '~if"",,'" /~, 77ß, JIr"",'l, /', "',~/, """"~(/ /,', ,J~) ., <",.:,','í¡<t¡l',,', "":b,, , ,', ""c' "', ,1),.,,', {J/<.;, ,,'t::¿j~/; ):?'!L-, /')b(¿;~, ' '(::':"I'~'-:[~tjf) , ' (,Þ', '..,/, /' 'u 1./., &"t-./:.1' '/ ~f , .. t'L,,- - .. '-' "'I" , / ~e: 1'1 'y,' ,'/ .< f.. ,-=~ fÆ " ~:', ¿";:_,'"'/,,.' l',y', ¿"'~"",- .. .. " .. - ?' Ÿ L" '-" c...-' c ,/1 ,I /"'" >},~p O,'?, /J--#-:-;:,//J', "','" '~,,'i /: ---",' -",!?,li~,../;z:z"/"""çt;/,,, /.,~~~?'/. P",,¿r;:':;1:k, iZi~' ./ "",ø,~, ,//,/ :?'./'I-1"'/~d ur~ '-c~ , ir - t:- /G /'/7 ;7 ",,~, ' ,,'" ~"'"" "n//" .. L -¡ ;tt; ~ I, ..-../ '/ r./ --"" 'Æ' "", , l /," /-,;:: ~ .::..--- j -'f1Ø~ n'",')/J, ',',"",,""',""1lj /.,'1""',:,"""'fti:~.,,,,,J,?/'" ~""'/.¡,¡",,,"/I![,.../ I/, -,¡¡r¿'Þ'",,"","'A~',~"'" ,~" ~~",,',:/,,'" '/)'~',.."",/ T~/~j~' ,/i:. {,./, '" '4U/ ;:/, / 'J,', " " -'" ~..,~ / '~t / ,/, L /. 'J:tt/A~" " ,', /: tð:',' .¿¿ :,W-P~ " ' , ~ 4r~~// / ....-rU/l /?!/ý!,,;/ £¿...t "', (..,- V, ,"'- "" ./ ...-:T ,íj!';~~;'-' i....<';..,~~' (.. t. : 1 ,r I ." ' ,/ ,'i ',~"",? .:,- "".',-4" A~, <,~) "",1, ,//~.. ,7 .or'",,' "'/."',lUJ i-,""",'?,"",4!t'£l""'.'¡¿".,,:::4f::"-::",'',.,'",'.",', .", ,i../~1tï"Ø1"";"'/,,,::' ~,' ,'(/'",',-""'~':"", "'."/I"",¿'...-:i.,..~"'E..t~','",,,.,',-'~/"'W'"~~,-'{J~"~,P,"~,_J¿¿,O~,'~, ,/ 1;1.", '~!Ii ,1'1 ,I ) , / , .. :¡, ~f!tt, ,It,,.i, ,I /1f?,j,-';;'/JI "",' ,,/ I"; ,.-:'_/J f .> ¡ , ,( " '/ "i,//& /, :;k"(""¿"'-J r../::.I' 'J .' ~........~ - t.-- .' i"'-"'!.~J:: ,.-.. ,,""", -¡ ,..." """ "" ~/:f<,r.A,"'.p/?"/,, t",""", ~,7./,h",~%, 1(/7_h,', ' '/~ ~~~;7""2'1.//:;..Pl,,"/,,,....-7.,""""",'V(7./"'--:;1J' )';.,,". ,~/,/":;;,;',,,/;l¿7~.J!>/'- /,/"/ '1'¡(~; /' --c:¿ /'.... -- t:..P' ~4:f/r - c//f'Z/y;;d;Z"éit2'; P-~~,IÆ "-""-,,,,,,-",-- '-" /tftØtb;::<://,;" 7/ ,,~ ¡ +', OJ /";?/ ,~,~. ¡) " """"'""',",,,, /Ý;,YY, ',¡f"I,;'I'~ Þ,""'" //j/"Jf.Z:/fÞ!/Z¡',.,,-,,¿," ,(Íj!.,-,¿,il-;" :",~C:¿~,-"",~""",,'1",',"',c., :'~""~,--,~,',:'~;',j.','~ ,~d!,"'~..-t.' ",/,/~.",,-{,I',¿,'<-'/.-,',' ',,-/;~,' ¡;".. ~,',,'t1,', ',.i"', 'f,' .. //l/t~"Ui ¡I,", f~/ ~' fA, "é"'~'~, /j,,< ',117,"'f,,~, ~,"1L/""V_;¡-1í""",,'Yf"'~',II/;~',,/,'Jh'", ',',,:L~,¡'_',,'7,,{J!t;"ß.,;t,':~ ",7',7"~,"'7"',".I'/~,,"",'/}';,7d,,"l,""',"i,' ",",",-', ~~"ú2¡!.;~/""-,,,',.,,:,','1f4,f/I.,&..I.r;/ .~ "'1'19"'1..:.<--", .?'" ;', ' !J$ .. ~,.. , " 'j..., ", ';1" ~-9 /"" /,1,,/1 Á2j;U 7/, ,7 /c.¿¿/)1'- ¿;~/) ~'/Ld ~, " ì' ~, Z, ,;' " 'v.~, ¿,ul-/ "'~,þ/ ",~~v1«./~)J-". ,'J/LJ/ ',,1' l ~,.. ,-: ~ ' ':J 11'"';';'4/,, -' ',,/ 'Y/7., ",f,,~, ~/ ¿P.:.pJ ~, "~~~. ,..""--4," -,',,<.. //?R', ~/),h/"",7 Æ '\2.-~', "', / f ~¿..., '-Z';/',~'..., I "r < fVs""V-- /!./'lL" "/ t/f.d/~ç:;..... W;::......../ I.,' ,',.. "'1' ,', ,l,.."~7("'Jw .f" - ,.~', ,""'. ," "", 4'J'd //;J,/~~ ;;Þ~;~ ~ ,-1.~"" ,k~;t?¡ /'~.. ",/ /" ,~, ~/ ".'; /; , ' " ,; """"""'/ /, 6' ,1 "4/'; , ,. /U':u.~~. ',' ¡;r¿r , /l v?ý':// ~ " ~.~J:~" "tQ/,:øÎ/-,,' ~~' .,/':a, , /~~,( "*,/.~" ..././ / ~./ / , / ,77, /.. ~ ," " "Þ' , r . . ....-vV c-c..é4 .. , ,-../~.,,/J" ~ ~)..~> /.(/ .'1".. ,I., "..~. -<~..- ,,", .,.,J ~' //¿'r:i/l"",,"/\~, 1 ~"",¥--,."",~r-¿;""",~,,~,,:; "'1Jtl!/¿~,"',.~,"!~',,"~,'~,,/,,""'¿"'--':7¡g¿ ",;/"""" ',',~",'.'\~,",),,""/'~~:é;¿i~~ /1t1rJ .' 4'v ..d~/,;;ø W / ~/ ~~// f<;' ~ ".//.t.O 4.1) . ,/ <11 / -C:'ð ~ '!./A-w;::ø;?:U.:t# 'C:~ ¿£...Z:-/;i.4f::/'¿:A~ ,~yþ¿'" (~Z~ÝX;"""'- /~},..¿;1 ./1~>~ 'y-/ A, ,,~ ,,', /~"'. (þ- /4,' ('í1!',..:-¿ý'",,~ .c:.. ," ..,/ "/:/'¿~,,'.'a)L-A " ,/. , -~/: ,f ,;"r7, , ,"~" ""J, ~~', ", "", " -:1 / f" .... .. U,"', ~ './..""~"!'I'~ // .-,'" ':';'' ,r f, "-, ",""", -- .. "",',-- !..--, ""'/, ;,'l'¡"¡l."l~'l" ;-;::::17:, /.. ~~,", ','~",:"', U ./ 44. F tlJ--7/!~"" ~,l -,:24~t " ;¿;Z;J~~:f:~2} //, :::; j ,¡f)'-"" ';'1.".' , ,.,' .,"" -" ~ ¡~ ,......././;f!,- .14 fIØ, /1/ì-Øí "" , "~' " \,-//lø;y/..¿:.¿/ //:,;/' .. "t//,.,/ ",. ~,,/',--/V.,' A!'~' ~/. ,'.,', ,,/".?-": '",' ' / t.ø. þ'/ '/ .. 4' ~ ", U' I .. ,',,' '\'--¿" """, " -c./ .. - ". /'./.. ,/ .. ,,:' .. ~---' ""'-) R:, ECE~,j\,'E, n,'"l" , ?"",'^-,""!4J"¡ ','""t?~""',1",,?,"/," , ~.. I!.J' /,f'> l' ':JI'~Y/ /'A"'] , "'¡PA'..<'7 '1/ ./ /~I-.L--- -,--Y/:,'"YiV,'" ;:/<1,.£1,/"" ,,' ""F /, .. C:"'?)j' ,; ~:; :;:'~ rj /,,/ " 7::;r/"j.. ^i¿ff,:/,..y , ,.:" ", ," ' -,J ,/11 \j' ç.,.".~"" .,':;:;"":..-'7 '-::;> ) j, tx... "" /'1'):;", "'-" ,J' [:;>( ,~ ,/ / /" / /' \ '...' L, --.., ,. 0 (J 20m CITY OF PICKERiNG PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT OEP/\RTMENT