Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutINF 04-26 Report to Council Report Number: INF 04-26 Date: March 23, 2026 From: Kevin Heathcote Director, City Infrastructure Subject: Hot-In-Place Asphalt Recycling Feasibility Assessment File: A-1440-001 Recommendation: 1. That Report INF-04-26 regarding Hot-in-Place Asphalt Resurfacing Feasibility be received; 2. That staff report back by Q2 2027 with an update on the performance feedback from the Region of Durham pilot project, and the suitability of implementing a Hot-In-Place Asphalt Resurfacing 2028 pilot project in the City of Pickering; and, 3. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the actions necessary to implement the recommendations in this report. 1.0 Executive Summary: The purpose of this report is to provide a feasibility assessment of hot‑in‑place asphalt resurfacing (HIR) technology in response to Resolution #876/25 passed on October 27, 2025, comparing its cost, service life, environmental impacts, and warranty terms to traditional paving methods. 2.0 Relationship to the Pickering Strategic Plan: The recommendations in this report respond to the Pickering Strategic Plan Priority of Advance Innovation & Responsible Planning to Support a Connected, Well-Serviced Community and Lead & Advocate for Environmental Stewardship, Innovation & Resiliency. 3.0 Financial Implications: There are no direct financial implications arising from the recommendations of this report. 4.0 Discussion: The purpose of this report is to report back to Council on the use of hot‑in‑place asphalt recycling (HIR) in response to Resolution #876/25, evaluating its feasibility based on cost, environmental impacts, and candidate selection compared to traditional paving methods. 4.1 What is hot-in-place asphalt recycling? Hot‑in‑place asphalt recycling (HIR) is a way to fix and renew an existing asphalt road without removing it and hauling it away. Instead of tearing out the old pavement and bringing in all new material, crews heat the top layer of the road right where it is. The heat softens the asphalt so it can be loosened, mixed, and refreshed. The recycled asphalt is then re‑shaped and compacted back into a smooth driving surface—all in one continuous operation on the road itself. This method is most comparable to the traditional mill and overlay process which includes milling and removing the top layer of existing asphalt and placing a new surface lift of asphalt to extend the life of the roadway. 4.2 How the Process Works a) Heat – Specialized equipment gently heats the road surface, so the asphalt becomes soft and workable. b) Loosen and mix – The softened asphalt is broken up and mixed with a combination of new material and a rejuvenating agent to restore flexibility of existing asphalt cement. c) Re-lay and compact – The refreshed asphalt is placed back down and compacted to create a smooth, renewed surface. This process happens on the roadway using a treatment train approach, eliminating the need to truck away the old asphalt or bring new asphalt back to site. 4.3 Candidate Considerations This method of asphalt rehabilitation is most suitable on roads where the underlying road structure (both granular and base asphalt) is still in good condition, but the surface shows wear such as cracking, roughness or aging. Core samples are used to analyze the properties of the existing asphalt in order to determine the appropriate additives required during the asphalt recycling process. HIR is less favourable on roads where base defects such as rutting, large cracking or potholes are prevalent and extensive base repairs at the granular and / or base asphalt level are required. Location also plays a factor for candidate selection. Due to a longer treatment train process, longer stretches of rural roads with less obstacles such as maintenance holes, utilities and entrances offer easier execution. 4.4 Environmental Impacts and Benefits HIR offers several environmental advantages compared to traditional road resurfacing. a) Reduces material waste – The existing asphalt is reused rather than removed and discarded, keeping material out of landfills and stockpiles. In one of the Region of Durham Pilot projects, additional recycled asphalt product (RAP) was used to widen and pave the shoulders which actually increased the reused material to over 100%. b) Conserves natural resources – By reusing existing asphalt, the need for new aggregates and asphalt binder is reduced, lowering demand for resource extraction. c) Lowers greenhouse gas emissions – Fewer trucks are required because material is not hauled away or replaced with new asphalt which reduces fuel use and associated emissions. For example, 1 km of road with a width of 8.5m would produce approximately 1,000 tonnes of waste and require the same amount of new asphalt. This results in approximately 100 truckloads of material being transferred to and from site with a conventional mill and overlay treatment. d) Reduces construction impacts on community – Shorter construction duration, fewer truck movements and less noise help minimize impacts on residents, businesses and road users. 4.5 Region of Durham Pilot Project In 2025, the Region of Durham completed its first HIR pilot project at the following three locations: Location 1 – Highway 2 From: west side of Ovens Road To: east of East Townline Road Municipality of Clarington Length: 4.2 km Width: 7.0 - 8.0 m (Existing) – 11.0 m (Proposed) Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT): 2,370 Location 2 – Shirley Road (Regional Road 19) From: east of Simcoe Street (Regional Road 2) To: 0.5 km east of Graham Road Township of Scugog Length: 4.6 km Width: 7.0 - 8.0 m (Existing) – 10.0 m (Proposed) AADT: 2,510 Location 3 – Lake Ridge Road (Regional Road 23) From: 340 metres north of Regional Road 12 To: South side of Highway 48 Township of Brock Length: 1.8 km Width: 7.0 - 8.0 m (Existing) – 11.0 m (Proposed) AADT: 5,130 Based on feedback from Region of Durham staff, the Contract was completed on time and within the approved budget. This contract offered a 2-year warranty on the work which is equal to traditional linear construction work in the City of Pickering. While the work was successfully completed, it is too early to analyze the quality of the material that was recycled. The Region will continue to monitor and assess the performance of the road, and the results will be shared with the City of Pickering. 4.6 Financial Comparison As a result of the savings from reusing excess material, reduced hauling and trucking and shorter construction duration, it is estimated that cost savings range from roughly 20-40% compared to a traditional mill and overlay treatment in the industry. Using estimated costs for a traditional mill and overlay treatment, the Region of Durham’s pilot project using hot-in-place asphalt recycling resulted in a cost savings of approximately 33%. While HIR and mill and overlay treatments are similar in nature, it is not a like for like comparison from a cost perspective. The HIR treatment has proven to be a viable option; however, several variables make each recycling process unique compared to a standard virgin asphalt mix that is used in traditional treatments. It is important to note that it isn’t a like for like comparison when analyzing cost. 4.7 City of Pickering’s Asphalt Resurfacing Program The City of Pickering has historically invested in an annual asphalt resurfacing program which consists of full depth asphalt replacement, minor grading works, curb and sidewalk repairs and maintenance hole adjustments. This type of program would not typically offer itself to a HIR treatment as both base and surface asphalt are being removed and replaced at a later stage in service life where base defects are typically present. 4.8 Future Pavement Rehabilitation Strategy By Q2 2026, the City of Pickering will have a newly completed Roads Needs Study that will support City’s pavement rehabilitation program and decision making for the next several years. The Roads Needs Study completes a physical conditional assessment of all City roads and creates a rehabilitation forecast based on characteristics such as road class, pavement condition, drainage, geometry and traffic volumes. The City intends to utilize a new strategy which includes a variety of treatments based on pavement asset management best practices. This would include a mill and overlay treatment when a road meets the typical criteria. 4.9 Potential Candidates / Pilot Projects The Region of Durham completed its HIR pilot project in 2025, with a performance assessment expected to be completed by the end of the maintenance period in 2027. City staff believe this information should be used to support decision‑making prior to implementing this treatment locally. This will provide a better understanding of how the pilot roads perform over the next two to three years through multiple freeze‑thaw cycles. Based on the results of the new Roads Needs Study and Region of Durham pilot project, the City will be in a better position to propose potential candidates for an HIR treatment during the 2028 budget cycle. Conclusion Hot-in-place asphalt recycling can be a cost-effective and environmentally responsible pavement preservation treatment when applied to suitable candidates. Compared to a traditional mill and overlay treatment, it offers potential cost savings, reduced environmental impact and comparable lifecycle value. However, the Region of Durham’s performance assessment of its 2025 HIR pilot project will provide valuable information for the City to consider before implementing a similar pilot in Pickering. In addition, the City should first complete its updated Roads Needs Study in 2026, which will inform the pavement rehabilitation program for the 2027 capital budget and forecast. Accordingly, it is recommended that staff report in Q2 2027 with an update on the performance feedback from the Region of Durham pilot project, and the suitability of implementing an HIR pilot project in the City of Pickering which would be reflected in the staff recommended 2028 Budget. Attachment: 1. Resolution #876/25 Prepared By: Kevin Heathcote, Director, City Infrastructure KH:mjh Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council By: Marisa Carpino, M.A. Chief Administrative Officer Legislative Services Division Clerk’s Office Directive Memorandum October 30, 2025 To: Kevin Heathcoate Director, City Infrastructure From: Susan Cassel City Clerk Subject: Direction as per Minutes of the Regular Meeting of City Council held on October 27, 2025 Feasibility of Hot-In-Place Recycling Methods for Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Council Decision Resolution #876/25 Please take any action deemed necessary. SC:am Copy: Chief Administrative Officer That the Director, City Infrastructure be directed to report back to Council in Q1, 2026 regarding: 1.The feasibility of incorporating Hot In-Place Recycling into Pickering’s roadmaintenance and rehabilitation program;2.Cost comparisons between traditional resurfacing methods and Hot In-PlaceRecycling, including potential long-term taxpayer savings;3.Warranty terms, life-cycle benefits, and projected service life; 4.Environmental advantages such as reduced trucking, material reuse, and loweremissions; and,5.Opportunities for pilot projects within the City of Pickering. Attachment 1 - Report INF 04-26