Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDecember 10, 2025 Committee of Adjustment Hearing Agenda Electronic Meeting December 10, 2025 - 07:00 PM Hearing Number: 12 Members of the public may observe the hearing by viewing the livestream on the HTML Agenda or the archived video available on the City's website. How to Participate Individuals looking to make a verbal delegation may do so through a virtual connection into the hearing. To register as a Delegation, please submit a Participation Form. In lieu of a verbal delegation, individuals may also submit written comments to citydev@pickering.ca. For more information regarding how to participate, please visit pickering.ca/coa. For inquiries related to accessibility, please contact the City Development Department Phone: 905.420.4617 | Email: citydev@pickering.ca Disclosure of Interest Adoption of Agenda Adoption of Minutes Draft November 12, 2025, Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Page 3 Minor Variance Reports MV 59/25 - 1515 Pickering Parkway Page 14 Pickering Valley Developments Limited MV 60/25 - 1557 Avonmore Square Page 26 J. Vrtik 1. 2. 3. 3.1 4. 4.1 4.2 MV 61/25 - 2657 Delphinium Trail Page 33 Z. Mahmood MV 62/25 - 1009 Dashwood Court Page 39 R. Sansanwal MV 63/25 - 397 Brookridge Gate Page 45 S. & D. Farmer MV 64/25 - 1851 Rosebank Road Page 52 Z. Valli MV 65/25 - 741 Marksbury Road Page 58 A. Pettitt MV 66/25 - 868 Reytan Boulevard Page 65 M. Hossain Other Business Adoption of 2026 Hearing Schedule Page 71 Appointment of Chairperson Appointment of Vice-Chairperson Adjournment 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 5. 5.1 5.2 5.3 6. Committee of Adjustment Hearing Agenda December 10, 2025 - 2 - 1 Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Electronic Meeting November 12, 2025 07:00 PM Pending Adoption Present Omar Ha-Redeye Denise Rundle – Vice-Chair Sakshi Sood Joshi Rick Van Andel Sean Wiley – Chair Also Present Deborah Wylie, Secretary-Treasurer Isabel Lima, Secretary-Treasurer Jasmine Correia, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Nilissa Reynolds, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer – Host Kerry Yelk, Planner II Ash Roy, Planner I Tanejaé Page-Hamilton, Zoning Examiner Figo Pham, Zoning Technician Absent: Not applicable. 1. Disclosure of Interest Not applicable. 2. Adoption of Agenda Moved By Sakshi Sood Joshi Seconded By Rick Van Andel That the agenda for the Wednesday, November 12, 2025 hearing be adopted. - 3 - Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes November 12, 2025 2 Carried Unanimously 3. Adoption of Minutes Moved By Omar Ha-Redeye Seconded By Sakshi Sood Joshi That the minutes of the 10th hearing of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, October 8, 2025 be adopted. Carried Unanimously 3.1 Draft Committee of Adjustment Minutes - October 8, 2025 4. Minor Variance Reports 4.1 MV 51/25 - 980 & 984 Kingston Road (Deferred at the October 8, 2025, Committee of Adjustment Hearing) St. Mary & St. John The Beloved Coptic Orthodox Church The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-laws 2498/87, 2923/88 and 7138/11, to: • permit a place of religious assembly to occur in the existing easterly building and its proposed addition, with a maximum gross floor area of 3,693 square metres, whereas the By-law states that one place of religious assembly shall be permitted and shall only occur in the easterly building existing as of the day of the passing of this By-law, and shall not exceed a maximum gross floor area of 1,075 square metres; – Committee Refused • permit a day nursery to occur in the existing westerly building, with a maximum of 130 children and a maximum size of 574 square metres, whereas the By-law states that one day nursery shall be permitted and shall only occur in the westerly building existing as of the day of the passing of this By-law, and shall be restricted to a maximum of 54 children and shall not exceed 465 square metres in size; – Committee Refused • - 4 - Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes November 12, 2025 3 recognize an existing setback of 3.4 metres between the easterly building and the lot line abutting Kingston Road, whereas the By-law states that all buildings shall be setback 14.0 metres from the lot line abutting Kingston Road; • recognize an existing building height of 8.0 metres for the westerly building, and permit building heights for the easterly building and its proposed addition as follows: a maximum of 30.0 metres to the top of the tower, and for the portion of the building not located within the cross hatched area, a maximum of 15.0 metres to the top of the roof, whereas the By law permits a maximum building height of 7.5 metres, except in the area cross hatched on Schedule II, where the maximum building height shall be 15.0 metres; • permit a minimum of 195 parking spaces to be provided and maintained on the lands, whereas the By-law states that there shall be provided and maintained on the lands a minimum of 260 parking spaces; and – Committee Refused • permit parking areas to be set back a minimum of 1.0 metre from the lot line abutting Kingston Road and 0.5 of a metre from the lot line abutting Merritton Road, whereas the By law states that all parking areas shall be set back a minimum of 3.0 metres from all road allowances. The applicant requests approval of these variances to permit the construction of a 2,618 square metre addition to the existing easterly building, which is used as a place of religious assembly, and to expand the daycare use in the existing westerly building. This proposal will be subject to a future Site Plan Approval application. Input from other sources were received from the Applicant, the City’s Engineering Services, the City’s Building Services Section, the City of Pickering Mayor and Council members, and the Toronto and Region Conservation Area (TRCA). In support of the application, the applicant submitted a Cover Letter in support of this application. Please contact the City Development Department to receive a copy of this letter at citydev@pickering.ca. - 5 - Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes November 12, 2025 4 Father Daniel Bessada, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. The applicant stated the following in support of the proposal: they are requesting to extend the easterly building in order to accommodate the growth of the congregation; the westerly building is zoned as a daycare, no changes are requested to the inside of the building; they are just looking to utilize the entire building, except for the gym, for the daycare in order to raise the amount of 129 children; they are not looking for any additional footprint to the westerly building; they are also looking to increase the height restrictions to construct a dome and a tower at the easterly portion of the property. In response to questions from a Committee member, the agent commented that they will need to go through the site plan approval and building permit process and the building permit process should the variances be approved. They do not anticipate construction to be complete for a couple of years. The northernly portion of the site has a creek and a portion of the site is within TRCA regulatory area. They will wait until the culvert construction is complete, construction should begin by spring 2026. The church does not exceed the 266 available parking on-site. Parking was reduced to 195 spaces by the Region, which is more than needed. When the parking study was conducted, two visits were made by the consultant, one on a Sunday and the other on Easter 2025. They have proposed several mitigative initiatives should the Church exceed projections outlined in the study, such as: use of the two gates on Highway 2 and Marritton Road for better car circulation, shuttles from another location for parking, or building a parking structure behind the church. Holiday services are held at night and will not affect traffic on Kingston Road. Most of the congregation resides in Pickering or surrounding Durham and Toronto cities. Additionally, there are two Coptic churches in Durham one in Pickering and the other in Ajax. A Committee member commented that regarding the height by law, there is an exemption for clock towers as it represents cultural history and significance. After reading the report and making multiple site visits a Committee member acknowledges the effort put into this proposal, and cooperation with agencies to address concerns and the different mitigations proposed. The member indicated the following concerns: the church is not connected to any neighbourhoods, 95 percent of attendees arrive by car therefore there is a heavy reliance on transit and vehicles; Kingston Road is getting busier; Merritton Road is narrow and both sides of the road is full of parked cars; there is no reference to the day nursery parking requirements; and the drop in and off section for the daycare is very close to Kingston Road; the - 6 - Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes November 12, 2025 5 proposed shuttle relies on other properties for parking; 195 parking spaces is not sufficient if the mitigations aren’t imposed; and there is no way for the City to enforce the mitigations. In support of the application, a Committee member made the following comments: the report states the parking is satisfactory for now and has no objection; if the church grows it is a positive thing. The Region of Durham has no issue with the proposal. They will be served by the new bus rapid transit system, which will alleviate traffic and parking demands. The parking study is based on the most extreme conditions of growth. The applicant commented that he is trying to work with all agencies. The daycare is operational from Monday to Friday from 9 am to 5 pm, and the parking peak is on Sundays. There is no parking demand for the daycare. The mitigative initiatives are in the future, if ever needed. It is not required now. In response to a question from a Committee member the Secretary-Treasurer stated that any illegal parking issues are enforceable by the City. It would be difficult to enforce a condition for the mitigative initiatives to a possible future situation. A Committee member commented that the variance giving most pause for members are the ones for parking and suggested a split motion. The following comments were made by a Committee member: more floor space means more seating and more parking. the parking By-law was passed by Council for one building for religious assembly in existing building. The applicant is looking at tripling floor area, therefore parking is directly related and affected. They suggested bringing the proposal to Council for approval. The applicant commented that at the time Council passed this By-law they were told not to knock down the two buildings in order to make it one large building. Moved By Denise Rundle Seconded By Omar Ha-Redeye That variances to: • recognize an existing setback of 3.4 metres between the easterly building and the lot line abutting Kingston Road; • recognize an existing building height of 8.0 metres for the westerly building, and permit building heights for the easterly building and its proposed addition - 7 - Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes November 12, 2025 6 as follows: a maximum of 30.0 metres to the top of the tower, and for the portion of the building not located within the cross hatched area, a maximum of 15.0 metres to the top of the roof; and • permit parking areas to be set back a minimum of 1.0 metre from the lot line abutting Kingston Road and 0.5 of a metre from the lot line abutting Merritton Road of MV 51/25 by St. Mary & St. John The Beloved Coptic Orthodox Church, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By law, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the existing easterly building and its proposed addition and the existing westerly building, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Revised Exhibits 1, 2, 5 & 9). And That variances to: • permit a place of religious assembly to occur in the existing easterly building and its proposed addition, with a maximum gross floor area of 3,693 square metres; • permit a day nursery to occur in the existing westerly building, with a maximum of 130 children and a maximum size of 574 square metres; and • permit a minimum of 195 parking spaces to be provided and maintained on the lands. of MV 51/25 by St. Mary & St. John The Beloved Coptic Orthodox Church, be Refused on the grounds that these variances are not minor in nature, for the following reasons: 1. The variances to permit more than triple the amount of Gross Floor Area for a place of religious assembly; doubling the number of children and increasing the amount of floor space for the day nursery; and together with a reduction of 75 percent of the required parking spaces has significant potential for negative - 8 - Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes November 12, 2025 7 and adverse impact as it relates to parking on the site. When considered individually and cumulatively, as required by the Planning Act, these variances do not meet the intent of the Council-approved zoning by-law amendment to limit the size and scale of development on the site for a place of religious assembly, with sufficient parking to be provided. 2. The combination of these variances is not desirable or appropriate for the development of the land, especially given the existing constraints and context of the site in the neighbourhood. The proposed mitigative measures to manage parking demand proposed by the applicant are unenforceable by the City and do not bind future owners of the site. The Committee must consider the public interest. 3. The opportunity for significant negative impact because of over development and an increase in the intensity of uses on the site warrants more comprehensive consideration by Council through a zoning by-law amendment. Carried (4 to 1) 4.2 MV 56/25 - 1376 Fordon Avenue R. Schmalgemeyer The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24, to permit: • a porch to encroach into the required front yard setback to a maximum of 3.5 metres, whereas the By-law permits a porch to encroach into any required setback to a maximum of 2.0 metres; and • a maximum lot coverage of 39.5 percent, whereas the By-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to permit an existing covered porch. Input from other sources were received from the Applicant, the City’s Engineering Services, the City’s Building Services Section, the Toronto and Region Conservation Area (TRCA), and two area residents. In support of the application, the applicant identified that the owner replaced the deteriorating front porch without securing a required building permit. Robert Schmalgemeyer, applicant, was present to represent the application. No - 9 - Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes November 12, 2025 8 further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. The applicant stated the deck the deck at the front of the house has rotted and needed to be replaced, it is in the same location it is just square instead of hexagonal, and with a gazebo on top. A Committee member commented that the proposed dwelling accounts for 32.6 percent of lot coverage and 6.9 for the porch, its similar set back from adjacent properties. A Committee member commented that this was constructed without the benefit of a building permit and encourages residents to go through that process prior to any type of construction. Moved By Omar Ha-Redeye Seconded By Rick Van Andel That application MV 56/25 by R. Schmalgemeyer, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By law, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the existing front yard porch, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Attachments 2 & 3). Carried Unanimously 4.3 MV 57/25 - 1155 Kubota Drive Kubota Canada Ltd. The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24 to permit an accessory structure in the front yard, whereas the By-law requires accessory buildings and structures only in the rear yard. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain a building permit to construct a security trailer. Input from other sources were received from the Applicant, the City’s Engineering Services, the City’s Building Services Section, and the Toronto and Region Conservation Area (TRCA). - 10 - Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes November 12, 2025 9 In support of the application, the applicant identified that the applicant has submitted a planning rationale letter in support of this application. Please contact the City Development Department to receive a copy of this letter at citydev@pickering.ca. Merve Kolcak, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In response to a question from a Committee member the agent stated that they are requesting the security trailer to be located fronting Kubota Drive on what is considered as the front yard of the property according to the By-law, however it is not used as such and has no affect on the streetscape. After a site visit and considering that the adjacent lands do not house an established residential neighbourhood, Omar Ha-Redeye moved the following motion: Moved By Omar Ha-Redeye Seconded By Rick Van Andel That application MV 57/25 by Kubota Canada Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By law, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance applies only to the security trailer, as generally sited and outlined in the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Attachments 2, 3 and 4). Carried Unanimously 4.4 MV 58/25 - 875 Baylawn Drive C. & R. Powell The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24, to permit a rear deck to be located 3.5 metres from the area designated “OS-HL”, whereas the By-law requires a minimum setback of 6.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain a building permit to construct a rear deck. Input from other sources were received from the Applicant, the City’s Engineering Services, the City’s Building Services Section, and the Toronto and Region - 11 - Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes November 12, 2025 10 Conservation Area (TRCA). In support of the application, the applicant identified that the existing deck is aging and unsafe, requiring replacement, and the proposed design is to provide safe access to the rear yard due to the change in grade. Spencer Joy, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. The agent commented that a building permit was applied for the during that process they and found out about the requirement for a minor variance. TRCA was provided the application and has no comments or objections. Moved By Omar Ha-Redeye Seconded By Sakshi Sood Joshi That application MV 58/25 by C. & R. Powell, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By law, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance applies only to the rear deck, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Attachments 2, 3 & 4). Carried Unanimously 5. Consent (Land Division) Reports 5.1 LD 11/25 - 1981 Guild Road A. Asokkanth, P. Santhiralingam & M. Subramaniam The applicant is proposing to sever an 876.6 square metre parcel of land (Part 1) while retaining an 876.6 square metre parcel of land (Part 2). Input from other sources were received from the Applicant, the City’s Engineering Services, the City’s Building Services Section, and the Toronto and Region Conservation Area (TRCA). Asokkanth Santhiralingam, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. - 12 - Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes November 12, 2025 11 The agent commented that their previously approved application lapsed before they could satisfy the conditions. Moved By Sakshi Sood Joshi Seconded By Rick Van Andel That application LD 11/25 by A. Asokkanth, P. Santhiralingam & M. Subramaniam, be Approved, with respect to Section 51(24) of the Planning Act criteria and recommend, subject to the conditions outlined within Attachments 3, 4 & 5. Carried Unanimously 6. Adjournment Moved By Denise Rundle Seconded By Omar Ha-Redeye That the 11th hearing of the 2025 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 8:10 pm. Carried Unanimously Minutes recorded this 12th day of November 2025. Chair Assistant Secretary-Treasurer - 13 - Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 59/25 Date: December 10, 2025 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application MV 59/25 Pickering Valley Developments Limited 1515 Pickering Parkway Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24 to permit a minimum parking ratio of 0.5 parking spaces per apartment dwelling unit for residents (286 resident parking spaces), whereas the By-law requires a minimum parking ratio of 0.55 parking spaces per apartment dwelling unit for residents (315 resident parking spaces). The applicant requests approval of this variance to obtain Site Plan Approval for the construction of a 40-storey residential condominium tower containing 571 dwelling units. Summary of Findings Based on the application and supporting documentation submitted, the City Development Department has reviewed the proposal in accordance with Section 45(1) of the Planning Act. Staff consider the requested variance to be minor, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and consistent with the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By -law. Notwithstanding this review, the applicant is responsible for demonstrating the justification for the relief sought and for establishing that the statutory tests are met. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following condition is recommended: 1.That this variance applies only to the proposed residential condominium tower, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Attachments 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7). Background In December 2022, the applicant submitted applications for Zoning By-law Amendment (A 01/23) and Site Plan Approval (S 01/23) to facilitate the construction of a 40-storey residential condominium building. As part of the Zoning By-law Amendment, the applicant requested a reduction to the minimum parking ratio from 0.8 to 0.55 parking spaces per apartment dwelling unit. Council approved the Zoning By-law Amendment on April 22, 2024. The Site Plan Approval application remains under review by the City. - 14 - Report MV 59/25 December 10, 2025 Page 2 Comment Conforms to the Intent and Purpose of the Official Plan Regional Official Plan “Envision Durham” On January 1, 2025, Durham Region became an upper-tier municipality without land use planning responsibilities. Pursuant to Subsection 70.13(2) of the Planning Act, the Region of Durham Official Plan is deemed to constitute an official plan of the City in respect of any area in the City to which it applies and will remain in effect until the City revokes or amends it. The Regional Official Plan (ROP) designates the property as “Urban System – Urban Growth Centre (UGC)” within a Strategic Growth Area (SGA). UGCs are intended to support more intensive, mixed-use, and complete communities that serve as focal points for residential intensification. SGAs are intended to be walkable, transit-supportive, and pedestrian-oriented communities where active forms of mobility are viable. Pickering Official Plan The Pickering Official Plan designates the property as “Mixed Use Areas – City Centre”. This designation permits high-density residential uses, retailing of goods and services, offices, restaurants, hotels, convention centres, community, cultural and recreational uses, and community gardens and farmers’ markets. The City Centre Neighbourhood policies state that a reduction in the number of required parking spaces may be considered where bicycle parking facilities and/or Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures are provided. The Zoning By-law requires a minimum of 0.5 bicycle parking spaces per dwelling unit. For the proposed development, the applicant is providing 286 bicycle spaces, meeting this requirement. The applicant submitted a Parking Justification Analysis, prepared by WSP Canada Inc. and dated August 29, 2023, as part of a Transportation Impact Study, outlining TDM measures to be implemented for the proposed development. TDM measures aim to reduce overall reliance on single-occupancy vehicles and promote more active modes of transportation. The applicant has committed to implementing the following TDM measures: • Unbundled Parking: Parking will be offered separately from the purchase of dwelling units. WSP notes that recent trends indicate that this is effective in reducing parking demand across the Greater Toronto Area. • PRESTO Cards: Pre-loaded PRESTO cards will be provided to new residents as part of a move-in welcome package. • Information Packages: New residents will receive packages containing information on transit schedules and fares, cycling maps, car-share options, and incentive-based programs (such as GO Transit’s Ride-to-GO program). - 15 - Report MV 59/25 December 10, 2025 Page 3 The requested variance to reduce the residential parking rate aligns with the policies for SGAs and the City Centre Neighbourhood. It supports transit, walking, and cycling within the City Centre and complies with the policies of both the Regional and Pickering Official Plan s. Conforms to the Intent and Purpose of the Zoning By-law The Zoning By-law requires a minimum of 0.55 parking spaces per dwelling unit for residents. Based on this ratio, the applicant must provide 315 resident parking spaces. The applicant is requesting a reduction in the residential parking ratio to 0.5 spaces per unit. Based on this reduced ratio, the applicant proposes providing 286 resident parking spaces, a reduction of 29 spaces. The By-law also requires a minimum of 0.15 parking spaces per unit for visitors, which is a total of 86 visitor spaces. The applicant is meeting this requirement. In support of this minor variance application, the applicant submitted a Parking Variance Letter, prepared by WSP Canada Inc., dated September 30, 2025. The parking analysis concludes that the proposed reduction is appropriate for the following reasons: Access to Transit and Walkability The requested parking reduction is appropriate given the site’s strong access to higher-order transit, local bus service, and a wide range of walkable amenities that lessen reliance on vehicles. The property is located within 900 metres (a 13-minute walk or 7-minute bike ride) of the Pickering GO Station and 600 metres (an 8-minute walk or 2-minute bike ride) of seven Durham Region Transit bus stops, including the Pickering Parkway Bus Terminal and the planned Durham-Scarborough Bus Rapid Transit project along Kingston Road. The site is also within walking or cycling distance of a range of local amenities, including, but not limited to: • several grocery stores, including Loblaws at Pickering Parkway and Liverpool Road (17-minute walk or 4-minute bike ride), Farm Boy located in The Shops at Pickering City Centre (15-minute walk or 3-minute bike ride), and Pacific Fresh Food Market near Kingston Road and Glenanna Road (16-minute walk or 4-minute bike ride). • numerous retail stores, restaurants, entertainment uses, personal services, financial institutions, and government facilities in the surrounding area. • public amenities such as Diana Princess of Wales Park, Chestnut Hill Developments Recreation Complex, and The Esplanade Park, in addition to on-site private outdoor amenity space. - 16 - Report MV 59/25 December 10, 2025 Page 4 Parking Sales Data WSP reviewed the parking sales trends for the proposed development. The following table provides a breakdown of the current parking sales for the building as of September 2025. Unit Type Units Available Units Sold Required Parking (0.55 space/unit) Proposed Parking (0.5 space/unit) Current Parking Sold 1-Bed 415 142 (34%) 229 spaces 208 spaces 36 spaces (0.25 space/unit sold) 2-Bed 156 24 (15%) 86 spaces 78 spaces 17 spaces (0.71 space/unit sold) Total 571 166 (29%) 315 spaces 286 spaces 53 spaces (0.32 space/unit sold) The current parking demand is 0.32 spaces per dwelling unit sold. Based on this ratio, WSP projected the number of parking spaces expected to be sold for the remaining units . Unit Type Unsold Units Current Parking Sold Projected Parking Sales Current & Projected Parking Sales 1-Bed 273 36 spaces (0.25 space/unit sold) 69 spaces for the remaining 273 units (0.25 space/remaining unit) 105 spaces (0.25 space/unit) 2-Bed 132 17 spaces (0.71 space/unit sold) 94 spaces for the remaining 132 units (0.71 space/remaining unit) 111 spaces (0.71 space/unit) Total 405 53 spaces (0.32 space/unit sold) 163 spaces for the remaining 405 units (0.4 space/remaining unit) 216 spaces (0.38 space/unit) WSP projects that the final parking demand for the building will be 0.38 spaces per dwelling unit. The requested variance seeks to reduce the minimum parking ratio to 0.5 spaces per unit, which exceeds the projected parking demand ratio. Based on the parking demand ratio projected by WSP and considering that the property is well-served by transit and within walking distance of numerous local amenities, staff are of the opinion that the proposed parking reduction will sufficiently serve the needs of future residents. Desirable for the Appropriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature Through Bill 185: Cutting Red Tape to Build More Homes Act, 2024, the Province amended the Planning Act to remove minimum parking requirements (other than for bicycles) for properties located within Protected Major Transit Station Areas (PMTSAs). In Durham Region, PMTSAs are identified in the Regional Official Plan. - 17 - Report MV 59/25 December 10, 2025 Page 5 Although the subject property is located within the City Centre Neighbourhood, it is situated just 30 metres (which is less than a one-minute walk) from Pickering’s PMTSA associated with the Pickering GO Station. While the site is technically outside the PMTSA boundary, it benefits from strong access to higher-order transit and local bus services. In some cases, its access to transit is comparable to, or better than, properties located within the PMTSA that are now exempt from minimum parking requirements. This transit accessibility aligns with the City Centre Neighbourhood policies, which encourage the continued transformation of the area into a more liv able, walkable, and human-scaled environment. The proposed development contributes to this transformation by introducing high-density residential uses in proximity to higher-order transit and a range of local businesses and amenities. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed reduction in residential parking is appropriate and minor in nature, as it reduces reliance on single-occupancy vehicles and encourages walking, cycling, and transit use in an area specifically planned for intensification and active forms of mobility. Input From Other Sources Applicant •The applicant has submitted a Cover Letter and Parking Variance Letter in support of this application. Please contact the City Development Department to receive a copy of these letters at citydev@pickering.ca. Building Services •No comments or concerns. Engineering Services •No comments. Public Input •No written submissions have been received from the public as of the date of writing this report. Date of report: December 2, 2025 Comments prepared by: Isabel Lima Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner Manager, Zoning & Administration IL:dg /CityDevDept/D3700/2025/MV 59-25/7. Report/MV 59-25 Report.docx Attachments Original Signed By Original Signed By - 18 - -04;6/- PlCKERlNG City Development Department l:\PLANNING\01 -MapFiles\MV\2025\MV 59-25\MV 59-25\MV 59-25.aprx ""O (ti 0 a::: .c u t-----'--------L,+---....,f ~ cc tT----::=..:ir.:.==-'--4=:..'...'...:~-~1 » ""O C (ti CJ) Location Ma File: MV 59/25 Recreation Complex Diefenbaker Court Alliance Road Munici al Address: 1515 Pickering Parkway © Th e Co rp orati on of th e C ity of Pi c ke rin g Pro du ce d (in part ) und er li cense fro m: © Ki ng's Printer, Ontario Mini stry of Natu ra l Resou rces. All rig hts reserved.;© Hi s Ma jesty th e Ki ng in Diana Princess Of Wales Park Attachment 1 Village East Park Ri g ht of Ca nada , Departme nt of Natura l Resources. A ll ri g hts re served.;© Te ra net Enterpri ses Inc . and its su ppliers. A ll ri g hts reserved.;© Municipa l Pro perty Assessme nt Corporati on and its supplie rs. All ri g hts reserved. Date: Oct. 02, 2025 SCALE : 1:5,000 THIS ISNOTAPLANOFSURVEY. - 19 - Attachment 2 Submitted Floor Plan – Underground Parking Level 1 File No: MV 59/25 Applicant: Pickering Valley Developments Limited Municipal Address: 1515 Pickering Parkway CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN.Date: November 12, 2025 to permit a minimum parking ratio of 0.5 parking spaces per apartment dwelling unit for residents (286 resident parking spaces) - 20 - Attachment 3 Submitted Floor Plan – Underground Parking Level 2 File No: MV 59/25 Applicant: Pickering Valley Developments Limited Municipal Address: 1515 Pickering Parkway CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: November 12, 2025 to permit a minimum parking ratio of 0.5 parking spaces per apartment dwelling unit for residents (286 resident parking spaces) - 21 - Attachment 4 Submitted Ground Floor Plan File No: MV 59/25 Applicant: Pickering Valley Developments Limited Municipal Address: 1515 Pickering Parkway CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: November 12, 2025 to permit a minimum parking ratio of 0.5 parking spaces per apartment dwelling unit for residents (286 resident parking spaces) - 22 - Attachment 5 Submitted Floor Plan – Floor 2 (Mezzanine) File No: MV 59/25 Applicant: Pickering Valley Developments Limited Municipal Address: 1515 Pickering Parkway CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: November 12, 2025 to permit a minimum parking ratio of 0.5 parking spaces per apartment dwelling unit for residents (286 resident parking spaces) - 23 - Attachment 6 Submitted Floor Plan – Floor 3 File No: MV 59/25 Applicant: Pickering Valley Developments Limited Municipal Address: 1515 Pickering Parkway CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: November 12, 2025 to permit a minimum parking ratio of 0.5 parking spaces per apartment dwelling unit for residents (286 resident parking spaces) - 24 - Attachment 7 Submitted Floor Plan – Floor 4 File No: MV 59/25 Applicant: Pickering Valley Developments Limited Municipal Address: 1515 Pickering Parkway CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: November 12, 2025 to permit a minimum parking ratio of 0.5 parking spaces per apartment dwelling unit for residents (286 resident parking spaces) - 25 - Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 60/25 Date: December 10, 2025 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application MV 60/25 J. Vrtik 1557 Avonmore Square Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24 to permit: • an uncovered deck to encroach into the required rear yard setback to a maximum of 2.5 metres, whereas the By-law permits an uncovered platform to encroach into any required setback to a maximum of 2.0 metres; and • a maximum lot coverage of 54 percent, whereas the By-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 50 percent. The applicant requests approval of these variance s to obtain a building permit to recognize an existing deck. Summary of Findings Based on the application and supporting documentation submitted, the City Development Department has reviewed the proposal in accordance with Section 45(1) of the Planning Act. Staff considers the requested variances to be minor, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and consistent with the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By -law. Notwithstanding this review, the applicant is responsible for demonstrating the justification for the relief sought and for establishing that the statutory tests are met. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following condition is recommended: 1. That these variances apply only to the existing deck, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Attachments 2, 3 & 4). Background A deck was reconstructed on the property in 2024 without a building permit. The applicant requires approval of this minor variance application to obtain a building permit to legalize the deck. - 26 - Report MV 60/25 December 10, 2025 Page 2 Comment Conforms to the Intent and Purpose of the Official Plan As of January 1, 2025, following changes made by Bill 23, applicable parts of the Durham Regional Official Plan are now deemed to be part of Pickering’s Official Plan. Under the Regional Plan, the subject property is designated “Urban System – Community Areas”. This designation permits a wide range of uses, including residential. The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject property as “Urban Residential Areas – Low Density Area”. Lands within this designation are intended to accommodate residential uses including detached dwellings. Decks are common accessory structures within residential areas. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances maintain the general intent and purpose of the Regional and Pickering Official Plans. Conforms to the Intent and Purpose of the Zoning By-law The subject property is zoned City Centre Residential One (CCR1), Exception Zone 386, under Zoning By-law 8149/24. The intent of the maximum permitted encroachment of 2.0 metres is to ensure adequate amenity space is maintained in the rear yard. The applicant has reconstructed a deck with a depth similar to the previous structure, thereby maintaining the established rear yard condition. The intent of the maximum 50 percent lot coverage requirement is to ensure an appropriate amount of space is left uncovered by buildings on a lot to provide for landscaping and outdoor amenity areas. While the total lot coverage is 54 percent, the deck itself represents only 7.5 percent of the coverage. The deck provides functional and usable amenity space within the rear yard and provides access from the main floor to the backyard. Adequate space is available to the south of the deck for landscaping and amenity needs. Desirable for the Appropriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The rear of the property abuts a parking area associated with the Chestnut Hill Developments Recreation Complex, meaning there are no rear abutting neighbours who would be affected by the deck. Properties to the west and east contain decks of similar size and height, establishing a consistent built form. The immediate neighbouring property to the west (1555 Avonmore Square) was granted approval for a Minor Variance Application (PCA 93/15) permitting a deck to project a maximum of 3.62 metres into the required rear yard. Staff consider the requested increase of 0.5 metres to the maximum permitted encroachment and the 4 percent increase in total lot coverage to be minor in nature. - 27 - Report MV 60/25 December 10, 2025 Page 3 Input From Other Sources Applicant •Need more usable outdoor space. Building Services •Deck constructed without the benefit of a building permit. A permit application has been submitted. Awaiting Committee’s decision. Mandatory inspections will be required once resolved. Engineering Services •Ensure the reduced rear yard setback (if approved with this application) does not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lot and surrounding area. •Ensure the increased lot coverage (if approved with this application) does not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lot and surrounding area. Public Input •No written submissions have been received from the public as of the date of writing this report. Date of report: December 1, 2025 Comments prepared by: Original Signed By Original Signed By Isabel Lima Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner Manager, Zoning & Administration IL:jc /CityDevDept/D3700/2025/MV 60-25/7. Report Attachments - 28 - -04;6/- PlCKERlNG City Development Department l:\PLANNING\01 -MapFiles\MV\2025\MV 60-25\MV 60-25\MV 60-25.aprx Recreation Complex Location Ma File: MV 60/25 A ~ Subject ·Lands ~ ro :, O" Cf) ~ 0 E Munici al Address: 1557 Avonmore Square © The Corporation of the C ity of Pickering Produced (in part) under li cense from: © King's Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© His Majesty the King in Right of Canada , Department of Natural Resources. A ll rights reserved.;© Teranet Enterpri ses Inc. and its suppliers. A ll ri ghts reserved .;© Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its supp li ers . All rights reserved . Attachment 1 Diana Princess Of Wales Park Date: Oct. 07, 2025 SCALE : 1:2,000 THIS ISNOTAPLANOFSURVEY. - 29 - Attachment 2 Submitted Site Plan File No: MV 60/25 Applicant: J. Vrtik Municipal Address: 1557 Avonmore Square CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: November 10, 2025 to permit an uncovered deck to encroach into the required rear yard setback to a maximum of 2.5 metres to permit a maximum lot coverage of 54 percent - 30 - Attachment 3 Submitted Deck Floor Plan File No: MV 60/25 Applicant: J. Vrtik Municipal Address: 1557 Avonmore Square CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: November 10, 2025 to permit an uncovered deck to encroach into the required rear yard setback to a maximum of 2.5 metres to permit a maximum lot coverage of 54 percent - 31 - Attachment 4 Submitted Deck Elevations File No: MV 60/25 Applicant: J. Vrtik Municipal Address: 1557 Avonmore Square CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: November 10, 2025 - 32 - Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 61/25 Date: December 10, 2025 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application MV 61/25 Z. Mahmood 2657 Delphinium Trail Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24, to permit a maximum driveway width of 5.2 metres, whereas the By-law requires a maximum driveway width of 4.6 metres. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain a building permit to widen the driveway for an additional parking space needed for an additional dwelling unit. Summary of Findings Based on the application and supporting documentation submitted, the City Development Department has reviewed the proposal in accordance with Section 45(1) of the Planning Act. Staff considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and consistent with the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By -law. Notwithstanding this review, the applicant is responsible for demonstrating the justification for the relief sought and for establishing that the statutory tests are met. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following condition is recommended: 1.That this variance applies only to the driveway, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Attachment 2). Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan As of January 1, 2025, following changes made by Bill 23, applicable parts of the Durham Regional Official Plan are now deemed to be part of Pickering’s Official Plan. Under the Regional Plan, the subject properties are designated “Urban System – Community Areas”. This designation permits a wide range of uses, including residential. The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject properties as “Urban Residential Areas – Low Density Area”, which are intended to accommodate residential uses, including additional dwelling units and associated parking. - 33 - Report MV 61/25 December 10, 2025 Page 2 Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Official Plans. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The subject property is zoned “SLD2” – Seaton Low Density Type 2 under Zoning By-law 8149/24. The intent of the maximum driveway width provision is to ensure that sufficient landscaped area is maintained within the front yard to support grading and drainage functions, provide an appropriate balance between hard and soft surfaces, and preserve the established streetscape character. The subject property currently contains two required parking spaces for the principal dwelling, and one additional parking space is required for the additional dwelling unit (ADU), for a total of three spaces. Due to the existing configuration of the driveway, there is insufficient width to accommodate all required parking spaces. The proposed widening will allow the d riveway to functionally accommodate the additional parking space associated with the ADU. Although the increase in driveway width represents a deviation from the maximum permitted, the property maintains a landscaped area of approximately 43 percent, exceeding the minimum requirement of 22 percent. As such, adequate soft landscaping will be retained to support drainage and maintain the visual character of the front yard. It is not anticipated to generate adverse impacts on neighbouring properties, nor will it alter the established character of the streetscape. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The proposed widening will provide the additional parking space required for the ADU, allowing the site to meet the By-law’s parking requirements. The increase in width is modest and does not reduce the landscaped area below the minimum, with 43 percent la ndscaping maintained to support drainage and preserve the front-yard character. The proposal is not expected to create adverse impacts on adjacent properties and remains consistent with the surrounding neighbourhood. Staff are of the opinion that the requested variance is desirable for the appropriate development of the land and is minor in nature. - 34 - Report MV 61/25 December 10, 2025 Page 3 Input From Other Sources Applicant •Three parking spaces are required for the ADU. One space can be accommodated in the garage and one within the permitted 4.6 metre driveway width, but a third space cannot be provided without widening the driveway by 0.6 metres. The change is limited to the private driveway and will have no impact on the street or neighbourhood, with only a minor reduction in landscaped area. Engineering Services •Ensure the increased driveway width (if approved with this application) does not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lot and surrounding area. •The driveway widening (if approved) is to be located entirely on private property. Curb cuts will not be permitted. Building Services •A Building Permit application has been submitted, awaiting Committee’s decision. No concerns from Building Services regarding the application. Construction is not permitted to take place until the Building Permit has been issued. Infrastructure Services •As this request falls within an Unassumed Subdivision we have no comments to provide at this time. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) •Proposed works to the west of the existing dwelling are outside the TRCA regulated area. TRCA has no further comments or objections. Public Input •No written submissions have been received from the public as of the date of writing this report. - 35 - Report MV 61/25 December 10, 2025 Page 4 Date of report: November 20, 2025 Comments prepared by: Ash Roy, B.URPL. Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner I Manager, Zoning & Administration AR:dg /CityDevDept/D3700/2025/MV 61-25/7. Report/MV 61-25 Report.docx Attachments Original Signed By Original Signed By - 36 - •idge Boulevard SK'/• ~ (/) ~ Q) :a: Q) (.) ~ 0 Cf) ~ Q) > ·;:: 0 (/) ~ Q) :S cu :a: ~ Q) Ql a.. ~ Egan Mew (/) ~ Q) :a: ~ ""O C 0.. Cf) s cu i= E ::::, C .r: 0.. Q) 0 Chateau cour\ L/ ~ Azalea Avenue Cactus 0 i,-----1,,~ ~,.. -04;6/- PlCKERlNG City Development Department l:\PLANNING\01 -MapFiles\MV\2025\MV 61 -25\MV 61 -25\MV 61 -25.aprx Location Ma File: MV 61/25 A Munici al Address: 2657 Delphinium Trail © The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: © King's Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© His Majesty the King in Right of Canada , Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers. All rights reserved.;© Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its suppliers. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 Date: Oct. 08, 2025 SCALE : 1:2,000 THIS ISNOTAPLANOFSURVEY. - 37 - At t a c h m e n t 2 Su b m i t t e d S i t e P l a n Fi l e N o : MV 61 /2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : Z . M a h m o o d Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 2 6 5 7 D e l p h i n i u m T r a i l CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : N o v e m b e r 10 , 2 0 2 5 to p e r m i t a m a x i m u m dr i v e w a y w i d t h o f 5. 2 m e t r e s - 38 - Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 62/25 Date: December 10, 2025 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning and Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application MV 62/25 R. Sansanwal 1009 Dashwood Court Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24, to permit a deck to encroach into any required rear yard to a maximum of 3.32 metres, whereas the by-law requires a maximum rear yard encroachment of 2.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain a building permit for an existing rear deck. Summary of Findings Based on the application and supporting documentation submitted, the City Development Department has reviewed the proposal in accordance with Section 45(1) of the Planning Act. Staff considers the requested variance to be minor, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and consistent with the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By -law. Notwithstanding this review, the applicant is responsible for demonstrating the justification for the relief sought and for establishing that the statutory tests are met. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following condition is recommended: 1.That this variance applies only to the rear deck, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Attachment 2). Background The Committee of Adjustment previously approved minor variances under P/CA 21/16 and P/CA 95/18, permitting reduced rear yard setbacks of 5.5 metres and 5.2 metres respectively . Under the permitted yard encroachment provision (s.14.2.5.e), a deck may encroach into the rear yard to a maximum of 2 metres. - 39 - Report MV 62/25 December 10, 2025 Page 2 On June 23, 2025, a building permit was issued for the construction of a rear deck. However, a subsequent site inspection revealed that the deck was not built in accordance with the approved plans. As a result, the applicant is requesting a variance to address this non -compliance. The public notice issued on November 26, 2025 indicated that the requested variance was to permit a deck to encroach into the required rear yard by a maximum of 3.21 metres. However, following a detailed zoning review, it was determined that the correct encroachment should be 3.32 metres. This adjustment is minor and does not require the issuance of a second notice Comment Conforms to the Intent and Purpose of the Official Plan As of January 1, 2025, following changes made by Bill 23, applicable parts of the Durham Regional Official Plan are now deemed to be part of Pickering’s Official Plan. Under the Regional Plan, the subject properties are designated “Urban System – Community Areas”. This designation permits a wide range of uses, including residential. The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject properties as “Urban Residential Areas - Low Density Area”. Lands within this designation are intended to accommodate low-density residential uses including detached dwellings. The requested variance is to permit a rear yard deck, which is a permitted accessory structure and commonly found within the neighbourhood. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan. Conforms to the Intent and Purpose of the Zoning By-law The subject property is zoned “X363” (SLD2-1) – Exception Zone 363 under Zoning By-law 8149/24. The requested variance is to increase the maximum permitted encroachment from 2.0 metres to 3.3 metres. The intent of the maximum encroachment provision is to maintain an appropriate amount of yard space for amenity area and storm drainage uncovered by buildings on a lot and to regulate the scale and size of the building. The property has an irregular lot configuration compared to typical rectangular lots in the neighborhood, providing additional rear yard space to accommodate drainage and amenity needs. Given the lot’s unique configuration, the deck does not appear disproportionately large relative to what is permitted. Furthermore, the portion of the deck encroaching into the required setback is limited to a small corner, while the majority of the structure complies with the by-law requirement. In terms of scale and visibility, the encroaching portion is limited and does not appear disproportionate relative to what is otherwise permitted. The deck integrates well with the surrounding residential context and does not alter the established character of the area. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. - 40 - Report MV 62/25 December 10, 2025 Page 3 Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The requested variance is intended to permit a rear yard deck. The property’s rear yard abuts an area reserved for the hydro lines, which does not create any impacts on adjacent residential properties. Only a small portion of the deck requires relief, and its placement does not interfere with drainage, access, or the use of adjacent properties. The proposed setbacks provide sufficient space to maintain privacy and prevent overlook concerns. Overall, the requested variance is not anticipated to result in any significant negative impacts on neighboring properties. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is desirable and appropriate for the development of the land and is minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Applicant •The lot is unique in the sense the west property line angles to the east property line to form a triangle. Engineering Services •Ensure the proposed deck location/size (if approved with this application) will not adversely affect the existing drainage patterns within the lot and surrounding area. Building Services •Deck not constructed in accordance with the approved plans. A building permit revision has not been submitted for the modifications to the as-built constructed deck and roof. Submit a building permit application for review. Applicant required to provide a legal site plan with drawings that are drawn to scale. Public Input •No written submissions have been received from the public as of the date of writing this report. - 41 - Report MV 62/25 December 10, 2025 Page 4 Date of report: December 1, 2025 Comments prepared by: Figo Pham Ash Roy, B.URPl. Zoning Technician Planner I Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration FP:AR:jc https://pickeringo365.sharepoint.com/sites/CityDevDept/D3700/2025/MV 62-25/7. Report/MV 62-25 Report.docx Attachments Original Signed By Original Signed By Original Signed By - 42 - c Q) u en ~ u .c g, C 0 0 2 Q) u rn a:: C .2 Clipper Lane ~[111111111/lij J er I I I I I I I I I I I I _ Dragonfly Avenue Foxtail Crescent -04;6/- PlCKERlNG od court Location Ma File: MV 62/25 Q) > ·.::: 0 ~ .c a. a. rn (/) Munici al Address: 1009 Dashwood Court © The Corporation of the C ity of Pickering Produced (in part) under li cense from: © King's Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© Hi s Majesty the King in C Q) u en ~ u ii, Q) 2: rn I City Development Department Right of Canada , Department of Natural Resources. All rights re served .;© Teranet Enterprise s Inc. and its suppliers. All rights reserved.;© Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its supp liers. All rights rese rved . l:\PLANNING\01 -MapFiles\MV\2025\MV 62-25\MV 62-25\MV 62-25.aprx Attachment 1 Date: Oct. 08, 2025 SCALE : 1:2,000 THIS ISNOTAPLANOFSURVEY. - 43 - Attachment 2 Submitted Site Plan File No: MV 62/25 Applicant: R. Sansanwal Municipal Address: 1009 Dashwood Court CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: November 17, 2025 to permit a deck to encroach into any required rear yard to a maximum of 3.2 metres - 44 - Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 63/25 Date: December 10, 2025 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application MV 63/25 S. & D. Farmer 397 Brookridge Gate Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24 to permit: •a maximum lot coverage of 43.5 percent, whereas the By-law requires a maximum of 38 percent; and •a deck to encroach into the required rear yard setback to a maximum of 4.5 metres, whereas the By-law requires a maximum of 2.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain a building permit to construct a rear deck. Summary of Findings Based on the application and supporting documentation submitted, the City Development Department has reviewed the proposal in accordance with Section 45(1) of the Planning Act. Staff considers the requested variance not minor in nature, not desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not consistent with the intent of the Zoning By-law. Notwithstanding this review, the applicant is responsible for demonstrating the justification for the relief sought and for establishing that the statutory tests are met. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following condition is recommended: 1.That this variance applies only to the rear yard, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Attachments 2, 3 & 4). Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan As of January 1, 2025, following changes made by Bill 23, applicable parts of the Durham Regional Official Plan are now deemed to be part of Pickering’s Official Plan. Under the Regional Plan, the subject properties are designated “Urban System – Community Areas”. This designation permits a wide range of uses, including residential. - 45 - Report MV 63/25 December 10, 2025 Page 2 The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject properties as “Urban Residential Areas – Low Density Area”, which are intended to accommodate residential uses. Rear decks are common structures within residential areas. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Official Plans. General Intent and Purpose of the Zoning By-law The subject property is zoned “R1H” – Residential First Density under Zoning By-law 8149/24. The applicant requests a maximum lot coverage of 43.5 percent, whereas the By -law permits a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent. The intent of the lot coverage provision is to regulate the size and scale of buildings and structures on a lot . The applicant also requests to increase the maximum permitted encroachment to required rear yard setback from 2.0 metres to 4.5 metres. The intent of this provision is to ensure adequate separation between structures, preserve outdoor amenity areas in the rear yard, and protect the privacy of abutting residential properties. These variances are interrelated. While the existing dwelling accounts for 33.3 percent lot coverage, the proposed deck contributes an additional 10 percent. This is a significant increase in coverage attributable solely to the deck, particularly given that a separate variance is required to permit the substantial encroachment into the rear yard. The size of the deck exceeds what is typically found on lots of similar size and configuration in the surrounding neighbourhood. The proposed encroachment places a large elevated structure (deck) closer to the rear property line, creating overlook and privacy concerns for the abutting property to the south. Although the applicant has proposed a privacy screen along the eastern portion of the deck, this does not mitigate impacts to the property directly to the rear, where the primary concern remains. The deck could reasonably be reduced in size to comply with By-law standards while still providing functional amenity space. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances do not maintain the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The proposed deck is substantially larger than what is typically found in the neighbourhood and its significant encroachment into the rear yard results in privacy impacts, particularly for the abutting property to the south. The proposed privacy screen doe s not address these concerns. A reduced deck could have provided functional amenity space without creating these impacts. The increase in lot coverage is mostly due to the size of the deck, and is more substantial than what would be considered minor. The overall scale and placement of the deck do not reflect the established character of the area and are not compatible with surrounding development. - 46 - Report MV 63/25 December 10, 2025 Page 3 Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are not desirable for the appropriate development of the land and are not minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Applicant •To permit the construction of an uncovered deck that exceeds the allowable lot coverage and reduces the required rear yard setback, in order to provide access to the rear yard due to the grade change. Engineering Services •Ensure the increased lot coverage and rear yard setback encroachment (if approved with this application) will not adversely affect the existing drainage patterns within the lot and surrounding area. Building Services •A Building Permit application has been submitted, awaiting Committee’s decision. No concerns from Building Services regarding the application. Construction is not permitted to take place until the Building Permit has been issued. Public Input •No written submissions have been received from the public as of the date of writing this report. Date of report: November 20, 2025 Comments prepared by: Ash Roy, B.URPl. Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner I Manager, Zoning & Administration AR:dg /CityDevDept/D3700/2025/MV 63-25/7. Report/MV 63-25 Report.docx Attachments Original Signed by Original Signed By - 47 - ""O cu 0 0::: 2 cu ""O C 3: cu LL Valley Gate ""O cu 0 0::: cu C .8 <( -04;6/- PlCKERlNG City Development Department l:\PLANNING\01 -MapFiles\MV\2025\MV 63-25\MV 63-25\MV 63-25.aprx Brookridge Gate Location Ma File: MV 63/25 A Munici al Address: 397 Brookridge Gate © The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: © King's Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© His Majesty the King in Right of Canada , Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers. All rights reserved.;© Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its suppliers. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 Q) > ·;:: 0 C ::, 0 E Q) 0) ::, 0 0::: Date: Oct. 15, 2025 SCALE : 1:2,000 THIS ISNOTAPLANOFSURVEY. - 48 - At t a c h m e n t 2 Su b m i t t e d S i t e P l a n Fi l e N o : MV 63 /2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : S . & D . F a r m e r Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 3 9 7 B r o o k r i d g e G a t e CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : N o v e m b e r 1 1 , 2 0 2 5 to p e r m i t a d e c k to e n c r o a c h i n t o th e r e q u i r e d r e a r y a r d s e t b a c k t o a ma x i m u m o f 4 . 5 m e t r e s to p e r m i t a m a x i m u m l o t co v e r a g e o f 4 3 . 5 p e r c e n t 3m - 49 - At t a c h m e n t 3 Su b m i t t e d D e c k F l o o r P l a n Fi l e N o : MV 63 /2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : S . & D . F a r m e r Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 3 9 7 B r o o k r i d g e G a t e CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : N o v e m b e r 1 1 , 2 0 2 5 - 50 - At t a c h m e n t 4 Su b m i t t e d D e c k E l e v a t i o n P l a n Fi l e N o : MV 63 /2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : S . & D . F a r m e r Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 3 9 7 B r o o k r i d g e G a t e CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : N o v e m b e r 1 1 , 2 0 2 5 - 51 - Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 64/25 Date: December 10, 2025 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application MV 64/25 Z. Valli 1851 Rosebank Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24, to permit a maximum lot coverage of 41.2 percent, whereas the By-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 38 percent. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain a building permit to construct a balcony in the rear yard. Summary of Findings Based on the application and supporting documentation submitted, the City Development Department has reviewed the proposal in accordance with Section 45(1) of the Planning Act. Staff considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and consistent with the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By -law. Notwithstanding this review, the applicant is responsible for demonstrating the justification for the relief sought and for establishing that the statutory tests are met. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following condition is recommended: 1. That this variance applies only to the balcony, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Attachments 2 & 3). Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan As of January 1, 2025, following changes made by Bill 23, applicable parts of the Durham Regional Official Plan are now deemed to be part of Pickering’s Official Plan. Under the Regional Plan, the subject properties are designated “Urban System – Community Areas”. This designation permits a wide range of uses, including residential. The Pickering Official Plan designates the subject properties as “Urban Residential Areas – Low Density Area”, which are intended to accommodate residential uses. Balconies are common structure within residential areas. - 52 - Report MV 64/25 December 10, 2025 Page 2 Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Official Plans. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The subject property is zoned “R1F” – Residential First Density under Zoning By-law 8149/24. The intent of the lot coverage provision is to regulate the size and scale of buildings and structures on a lot, ensure sufficient space remains for soft landscaping and private outdoor amenity, and support proper stormwater management and drainage. The existing dwelling comprises the majority of the lot coverage, and the proposed balcony represents a modest extension that is proportionate to the scale of the house. The balcony will not increase the overall building footprint on the ground and therefo re does not diminish functional landscaped space within the rear yard. The proposal maintains all required setbacks, and its design helps to avoid any negative impacts on adjacent properties. Despite the modest increase in lot coverage, adequate open space remains to support soft landscaping, stormwater infiltration, and the functional use of the rear yard. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The proposed balcony provides functional outdoor amenity space for the dwelling and is appropriately integrated into the rear elevation of the house. Its size and placement are modest, and the structure maintains all required setbacks, ensuring compatib ility with neighbouring properties. The balcony will not alter the established rear -yard character of the area. The increase in lot coverage does not materially reduce the usability of the rear yard or its capacity to support soft landscaping and stormwater infiltration. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is desirable for the appropriate development of the land and is minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Applicant •The applicant has submitted a Cover Letter in support of this application. Please contact the City Development Department to receive a copy of this letter at citydev@pickering.ca. Engineering Services •Ensure the proposed deck and increased lot coverage (if approved with this application) will not adversely affect the existing drainage patterns within the lot and surrounding area. - 53 - Report MV 64/25 December 10, 2025 Page 3 Building Services •A Building Permit application has been submitted, awaiting Committee’s decision. No concerns from Building Services regarding the application. Construction is not permitted to take place until the Building Permit has been issued. Public Input •No written submissions have been received from the public as of the date of writing this report. Date of report: November 20, 2025 Comments prepared by: Ash Roy, B.URPL. Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner I Manager, Zoning & Administration AR:jc Attachments Original Signed By Original Signed By - 54 - -- Q) > ·.:::: 0 C Q) () (/) ~ u ~ (ll > C Q) ~ i--- Attachment 1 Q) > 'i::: - 0 5' - Q) "> 0) C ·.:::: 0.. Cl) f---- '-- ~~ ~....---------t--.------r'----+--,--t--++---1.-_J_-.---'----,---1--,---- Woodsmere Crescent Charnwood Court S.m. Woodsmere Park Q) > ·.:::: 0 ~ (ll ""O Q) u ~ .r: s St. Elizabeth Seton Catholi c School -04;6/- PlCKERlNG City Development Department Altona Forest Public School ""O (ll 0 0::: 0£ C (ll .0 Q) (/) 0 0::: Subject Lands I I I Dencourt Drive I m ~ u5 E '--- ro E Q) LL f-----.-----~v----------L----'-----'-----'---'-----'---..V" 1---t-----i( Post Drive I ./ '- Strouds Lane ,,-\ c Q) > Q) ·.:::: () (/) 0 ~ ~ u 0.. (ll 0£ :a: (ll 0 ~ ""O Q) (ll .2: e Cl) c:o Location Map File: MV 64/25 Applicant: Z. Valli Municipal Address: 1851 Rosebank Road © Th e Co rporati on of th e C ity of Picke rin g Prod uced (in pa rt ) u nder li cense fro m: © Ki ng's Printer, Ontario Mi ni stry of Natu ra l Resou rces. All righ ts reserved.;© His Ma jesty th e Ki ng in Ri g ht of Ca nada , Departme nt of Natura l Resources. A ll ri g hts reserved.;© Te ra net Enterpri ses Inc . and its su ppli ers. A ll ri g hts reserved.;© Mun icipa l Pro perty Assessme nt Corporati on and its supplie rs. All ri g hts reserved. \ IV AmberleaA,- Date: Oct. 21, 2025 ;l~;T~2~~~:2. 0 I l:\PLANNING\01 -MapFIles\03 -Appllcations\MV\2025\MV 64-25\MV 64 -25\MV 64 -25.aprx - 55 - At t a c h m e n t 2 Su b m i t t e d Si t e Pl a n Fi l e N o : MV 64 /2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : Z. V a l l i Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 18 5 1 R o s e b a n k R o a d CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : Oc t o b e r 2 2 , 2 0 2 5 to p e r m i t a ma x i m u m l o t co v e r a g e o f 4 1 . 2 pe r c e n t - 56 - At t a c h m e n t 3 Su b m i t t e d E a s t ( R e a r ) a n d N o r t h ( S i d e ) E l e v a t i o n P l a n s Fi l e N o : MV 64 /2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : Z . V a l l i M u n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 1 8 5 1 R o s e b a n k R o a d C O N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : O c t o b e r 2 2 , 2 0 2 5 - 57 - Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 65/25 Date: December 10, 2024 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application MV 65/25 A. Pettitt 741 Marksbury Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24, to permit a minimum side yard setback: one side 0.6 metres and other side 2.4 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum side yard setback: one side 1.5 metres and other side 2.4 metres. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to permit an attached carport. Summary of Findings Based on the application and supporting documentation submitted, the City Development Department has reviewed the proposal in accordance with Section 45(1) of the Planning Act. Staff considers the requested variance to be minor, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and consistent with the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By -law. Notwithstanding this review, the applicant is responsible for demonstrating the justification for the relief sought and for establishing that the statutory tests are met. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following condition is recommended: 1. That this variance applies only to the proposed carport, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Attachments 2, 3 & 4). Comment General Intent and Purpose of the Official Plan The subject site is designated Urban Residential Areas – Low Density Area within the West Shore Neighbourhood. The applicant is proposing to construct an attached carport . Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to permit a reduced side yard for an attached carport maintains the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan. - 58 - Report MV 65/25 December 10, 2025 Page 2 General Intent and Purpose of the Zoning By-law The subject property is zoned “R1E” – Detached Residential under Zoning By-law 8149/24, as amended. A detached dwelling along with attached garage or carport is permitted. Side Yard Setback for Carport The intent of the side yard setback requirement is to provide an appropriate separation between structures on abutting properties to maintain pedestrian access, accommodate grading, drainage and residential services; and be compatible with the character of the immediate neighbourhood. The reduced side yard for the carport will not increase the overall massing of the dwelling and generally maintains the character of the built form along Marksbury Road, which consists namely of detached dwellings with attached garages and detached garages. The requested reduction in the north side yard setback from 1.5 metres to 0.6 metres does not compromise the function of the north side yard, as the proposed carport is an open structure that preserves access to both the front and rear yards. The carport will not adversely affect drainage or stormwater runoff, as it will cover an existing impermeable driveway and direct stormwater runoff through an eavestrough along the sloped roof line. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By -law. Desirable for the Appropriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The requested variance for a reduced side yard will permit an attached carport. Overall, the proposed carport will not restrict access to the associated front or rear yards and does not compromise the overall massing of the dwelling on the lot. The existing development along Marksbury Road consists of detached dwellings with carports as well as attached and detached garages. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is desirable for the appropriate development of the land and is minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Applicant • The required 1.5 metre setback for an attached structure the associated carport too narrow to park a vehicle. Detached structure is not feasible as the detached structure is only allowed in the rear yard. Engineering Services • Ensure the reduced side yard setback (if approved with this application) does not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lot and surrounding area. - 59 - Report MV 65/25 December 10, 2025 Page 3 Building Services •A Building Permit application has been submitted, awaiting Committee’s decision. No concerns from Building Services regarding the application. Construction is not permitted to take place until the Building Permit has been issued. Mandatory inspections will be required. Public Input •No written submissions have been received from the public as of the date of writing this report Date of report: December 2, 2025 Comments prepared by: Kerry Yelk Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner II Manager, Zoning & Administration KY:dg /CityDevDept/D3700/2025/MV 65-25/7. Report/MV 65-25 Report.doc Attachments Original Signed By Original Signed By - 60 - ---- I (lJ > ·;:: 0 >, 0 c3 > -04;6/- PlCKERlNG City Development Department Sanok Drive (lJ C: ctl ....J ro 0 u >, ~ (.'.) I I ~~__,__Subject Vicki Drive Location Map File: MV 65/25 -0 ctl 0 a::: ~ ::::, ..c Cl) ~ ctl ~ Applicant: A. Pettitt Lands __ ___, Oklahoma Drive Municipal Address: 7 41 Marksbury Road © Th e Co rporati on of th e C ity of Picke rin g Prod uced (in part) u nder li cense from: ~ ctl > ~ ::::, 0 co (lJ 0 .c: Cl) U) (lJ s © Ki ng's Pri nter, Ontario Mi ni stry of Natura l Resou rces. All righ ts reserved.;© His Ma jesty the Ki ng in Ri g ht of Ca nada , Departme nt of Natu ra l Resou rces. A ll rig hts reserved.;© Tera net Enterpri ses Inc . and its su ppli ers. A ll ri g hts reserved.;© Mun icipal Pro perty Assessment Corporati on and its supplie rs. A ll ri g hts reserved. l:\PLANNING\01 -MapFIles\03 -Appllcations\MV\2025\MV 65-25\MV 65-25\MV 65-25.aprx Attachment 1 0 Breezy Drive Frenchman's Bay Public School - ci, ~ in -"' C: -::::, E 0.. .c: u Date: Oct. 30, 2025 ;l~;T~2 ~~~~-o I - 61 - At t a c h m e n t 2 Su b m i t t e d S i t e P l a n Fi l e N o : MV 65 /2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : A . P e t t i t t Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 7 4 1 M a r k s b u r y R o a d CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : N o v e m b e r 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 to p e r m i t a m i n i m u m s i d e y a r d s e t b a c k : on e s i d e 0 . 6 m e t r e s a n d o t h e r s i d e 2 . 4 me t r e s - 62 - At t a c h m e n t 3 Su b m i t t e d F r o n t ( W e s t ) E l e v a t i o n P l a n Fi l e N o : MV 65 /2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : A . P e t t i t t Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 7 4 1 M a r k s b u r y R o a d CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : N o v e m b e r 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 63 - At t a c h m e n t 4 Su b m i t t e d S i d e ( N o r t h ) E l e v a t i o n P l a n Fi l e N o : MV 65 /2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : A . P e t t i t t Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 7 4 1 M a r k s b u r y R o a d CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : N o v e m b e r 1 3 , 2 0 2 5 - 64 - Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 66/25 Date: December 10, 2025 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Application MV 66/25 M. Hossain 868 Reytan Boulevard Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 8149/24, to permit a maximum driveway width of 6.25 metres at the front lot line, whereas the By-law permits a maximum driveway width of 3.0 metres for lots with a lot frontage less than 11.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to widen the existing driveway. Summary of Findings Based on the application and supporting documentation submitted, the City Development Department has reviewed the proposal in accordance with Section 45(1) of the Planning Act. Staff considers the requested variance to be minor, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and consistent with the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By -law. Notwithstanding this review, the applicant is responsible for demonstrating the justification for the relief sought and for establishing that the statutory tests are met. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following condition is recommended: 1.That this variance applies only to the proposed driveway, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted site plan (refer to Attachment 2). Background The applicant is proposing to widen the existing driveway to facilitate an additional parking space for an Additional Dwelling Unit in the basement. For residential zones, the Zoning By-law establishes maximum driveway width based on lot frontage, with separate standards for lots less than 11.0 metres and those 11.0 metres or greater. The subject property has a lot frontage of 10.7 metres, which places it within the category that permits a maximum driveway width of 3.0 metres. - 65 - Report MV 66/25 December 10, 2025 Page 2 It should be noted that the Public Notice indicated that the Zoning By -law permits a maximum driveway width of 6.0 metres for lots with a frontage greater than 11.0 metres. Following the issuance of the Notice, a review of the property survey confirmed that the lot frontage is 10.7 metres. Accordingly, the applicable maximum driveway width is 3 .0 metres for lots with a frontage of less than 11.0 metres. No new notice is required, the applicant has made no revisions to their plans. Comment Conforms to the Intent and Purpose of the Official Plan As of January 1, 2025, the following changes made by Bill 23, applicable to parts of the Durham Regional Official Plan are now deemed to be part of Pickering’s Official Plan. Under the Regional Official Plan, the subject property is designated “Urban System – Community Areas”, which permits a wide range of uses, including residential. Under the Pickering Official Plan, the subject site is designated “Urban Residential Areas – Low Density Area” within the Bay Ridges Neighborhood, which permits residential uses. Conforms to the Intent and Purpose of the Zoning By-law The subject property is zoned “R2A” under Zoning By-law 8149/24. An Additional Dwelling Unit is a permitted use. Maximum Driveway Width For residential zones, the Zoning By-law establishes maximum driveway widths based on lot frontage, with separate standards for lots less than 11.0 metres and those greater than 11.0 metres. According to the property survey, the lot has a lot frontage of 10.7 metres, and therefore the maximum permitted driveway width is 3.0 metres. The intent of restricting driveway widths is to ensure sufficient space is maintained in the front yard for landscaping and to accommodate grading and drainage. The existing driveway has a total width of 3.6 metres, which maintains a legal non-conforming status under Section 1.7 of By-law 8149/24. The additional driveway space is required to accommodate a side by side parking arrangement for an Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU) located in the basement of the dwelling. The applicant is proposing approximately 3 4.0 square metres of soft landscaping within the front yard (42 percent of the front yard area), which provides sufficient space for landscaping and appropriate drainage. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to increase the driveway width is in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By -law. - 66 - Report MV 66/25 December 10, 2025 Page 3 Desirable for the Appropriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The requested variance to permit a driveway width of 6.25 metres will facilitate a side by side parking arrangement. The proposed configuration will not negatively impact lot drainage and is generally consistent with the character of the existing lots along Reytan Boulevard, which features a mix of single and double driveways. It will also accommodate an additional parking space while maintaining a 41 percent landscaped area. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is minor in nature and desirable for the appropriate development of the land. Input From Other Sources Applicant • Due to the narrow lot frontage and the location of the side entrance, it is not possible to accommodate additional parking elsewhere on the property. The proposed widening is minor, maintains adequate landscaping, and will not negatively affect the streetscape or neighbourhood character. Building Services • No comments. City Infrastructure • A Curb Cut permit is required if the applicant choses to request an increase to their access depression width. ▪ Access width shall not exceed Driveway Width permitted through the applicable Zoning By-Law or, where a Minor Variance to a driveway width is granted, the Driveway Width permitted through the Minor Variance process. ▪ Access width shall not exceed 6.0 metres. ▪ Access width will not be permitted to increase beyond where the ultimate access width would eliminate an existing, on-street parking space. An on-street parking space is noted at length of 6.0 metres. Engineering Services • Ensure the increased driveway width (if approved with this application) does not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lot and surrounding area. - 67 - Report MV 66/25 December 10, 2025 Page 4 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) •Based on TRCA’s current mapping, the regulatory floodplain associated with Krosno Creek is contained to the rear (west) of the site. In June 2025, TRCA approved a permit for interior alterations and three enlarged windows required for a new secondary suite in the basement of the existing dwelling. As such, the proposed works at the front (east) of the property will be outside the TRCA regulated area. Public Input •No written submissions have been received from the public as of the date of writing this report. Date of report: December 3, 2025 Comments prepared by: Tanejaé Page-Hamilton Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Zoning Examiner Manager, Zoning & Administration TPH:nr /CityDevDept/D3700/2025/MV 66-25/7. Report/MV 66-25 Report.docx Attachments Original Signed By Original Signed By - 68 - N OJ §; ~ (l) ::, C: (l) -~of- Pl(KER]NG City Development Department 7-- 0 rJ) ::, 0 OJ 0 C: ro <'. OJ 0. Bronwen Lane Location Ma File: MV 66/25 Munici al Address: 868 Reytan Blvd. © Th e Co rporati on of th e City of Pi cke rin g Pro du ce d (in part ) und er li ce nse fro m: © Kin g's Printer, Ontari o Mini stry of Natu ra l Resou rces . All ri ghts reserved .;© Hi s Ma jesty the Kin g in Right of Ca nada , Department of Natu ra l Reso u rces. All rig hts reserved .;© Tera net Enterprises In c. and its su ppli ers. All rig hts reserved.;© Munici pal Prope rty Assessmen t Corporation and its su ppliers. All rights reserved. L:\PLANNING\01 -MapFiles\03 -Applications\MV\2025\MV 66--25\MV 66--25\MV 66--25.aprx Attachment 1 ""O (ll 0 0::: .c (.) (ll (!) [lJ >, ""O C (ll Cf) Date: Nov. 11, 2025 SCALE : 1:2,000 THIS ISNOTAPLANOFSURVEY. - 69 - At t a c h m e n t 2 Su b m i t t e d S i t e P l a n Fi l e N o : MV 66 /2 5 Ap p l i c a n t : M . H o s s a i n Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 8 6 8 R e y t a n B o u l e v a r d CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : D e c e m b e r 2 , 20 2 5 to p e r m i t a m a x i m u m d r i v e w a y wi d t h o f 6 . 2 5 m e t r e s REYTAN BLVD - 70 - pickering.ca Committee of Adjustment Tentative Hearing Schedule for 2026 Hearing Date (Wednesday) Last Day for Filing (Tuesday) Sign Posting Due Date (Wednesday) Last Day to Appeal Committee’s Decision (Tuesday) January 14 November 25, 2025 December 17 February 3 February 11 December 23, 2025 January 28 March 3 March 11 January 20 February 25 March 31 April 8 February 17 March 25 April 28 May 13 March 24 April 29 June 2 June 10 April 21 May 27 June 30 July 8 May 19 June 24 July 28 August 12 June 23 July 29 September 1 September 9 July 21 August 26 September 29 October 14 August 25 September 30 November 3 November 11 September 22 October 28 December 1 Please note: the Last Day for Filling day is 50 days prior to the Hearing date when a Preliminary Zoning Review and Minor Variance (MV), or a complex Consent (Land Division) is required, and 30 days if only MV or a simple Consent (Land Division) is required. - 71 -