Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOctober 9, 2024 Committee of Adjustment Agenda Hearing Number: 10 Date: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 pickering.ca Agenda Committee of Adjustment Wednesday, October 9, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page Number For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Secretary-Treasurer or Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Telephone: 905.420.4617 Email: citydev@pickering.ca 1.Disclosure of Interest 2.Adoption of Agenda 3.Adoption of Minutes from September 11, 2024 hearing 1-11 4.Minor Variance Reports 4.1 MV 62/24 – 1524 Winville Road 12-18 4.2 MV 63/24 – 1804 Dencourt Drive 19-25 4.3 MV 64/24 to MV 67/24 – 145 & 151 Twyn Rivers Drive 26-28 5.Consent Reports 5.1 LD 14/24 – 235 Twyn Rivers Drive 29-44 5.2 LD 15/24, MV 60/24 & MV 61/24 – 1238 Bayview Street 45-81 6. Adjournment Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, September 11, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 1 of 11 Pending Adoption Present Omar Ha-Redeye Denise Rundle – Vice-Chair Sakshi Sood Joshi Rick Van Andel Sean Wiley – Chair Also Present Deborah Wylie, Secretary-Treasurer Cody Morrison, Secretary-Treasurer – Host Jasmine Correia, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Nilissa Reynolds, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer – Host Kerry Yelk, Planner II Michael David, Zoning Examiner Absent Not applicable. 1.Disclosure of Interest No disclosures of interest were noted. 2.Adoption of Agenda Moved by Sakshi Sood JoshiSeconded by Rick Van Andel That the agenda for the Wednesday, September 11, 2024 hearing be adopted. Carried Unanimously 3.Adoption of Minutes Moved by Rick Van AndelSeconded by Omar Ha-Redeye That the minutes of the 8th hearing of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday,August 14, 2024 be adopted. Carried Unanimously -1- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, September 11, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 2 of 11 4.Minor Variance Reports 4.1 (Deferred at the August 14, 2024 Committee of Adjustment hearing) MV 50/24 S.Nazarinia621 West Shore Boulevard The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-laws 7610/18 to permit: •a minimum front yard setback of 1.5 metres, whereas the By-law requires aminimum front yard setback of 7.5 metres; •a minimum rear yard setback of 2.4 metres, whereas the By-law requires aminimum rear yard setback of 7.5 metres; •a maximum lot coverage of 36.8 percent, whereas the By-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent; and •to permit a maximum building height of 10.3 metres, whereas the By-law permits amaximum building height of 9.0 metres. (withdrawn by the applicant at thehearing) The applicant requests approval of this variance to obtain a future building permit for a three-storey detached dwelling. Input from other sources were received from the Applicant, City’s Engineering Services, City’s Building Services Section, one area resident and two nieghbourhood associations. In support of the application, the applicant identified the subject property has a lot depth of only 15.24 metres. As such, it is not possible to build a dwelling on the lot without variances for front and rear yard setback. The proposed lot coverage includes area of two porches and the basement walk up. The dwelling height is consistent with other new builds in the neighbourhood. Arlene Beaumont, agent, was present to represent the application. One representative from a neighbourhood association was present to speak on the application. -2- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, September 11, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 3 of 11 The agent made a brief presentation in support of the application. A representative from a neighbourhood association stated they have no further objections with the application as the third floor is being removed from the proposal by the applicant. The Secretary-Treasurer confirmed the distance from the curb to the main will is 41 feet. Given the unique lot, structure of the property, the covered porches attributing to the overall lot coverage, and the applicant revising their proposal to remove the height variance, Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Omar Ha-Redeye That application MV 50/24 by S. Nazarinia, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed development, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to the revised Exhibit 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated August 14, 2024). Carried Unanimously 4.2 MV 53/24 D. Yapa 1278 Commerce Street The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-laws 7610/21, 7872/21 and 7873/21, to permit: • a minimum front yard setback of 4.5 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 7.5 metres; • uncovered steps and platforms (uncovered front yard porch) not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.8 metres into the required front yard, whereas the By-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.5 metres into any required front or rear yard; • a minimum flankage yard setback (first storey addition) of 3.0 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum flankage yard setback of 4.5 metres; -3- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, September 11, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 4 of 11 • a partially covered platform (second storey balcony) not exceeding 3.3 metres in height above grade and not projecting more than 2.2 metres into the required flankage yard, whereas the By-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.0 metre into the required flankage yard; • main eaves (second storey balcony canopy) not projecting more than 0.85 of a metre from the proposed balcony projection, whereas the By-law permits main eaves, belt courses, chimney breasts, sills or cornices not projecting more than 0.45 of a metre into required yard; • a minimum rear yard setback of 2.8 metres, whereas the By-law permits a minimum rear yard setback of 7.5 metres; • a minimum side yard setback of 1.2 metres, whereas the By-law permits a minimum side yard setback of 1.5 metres; and • a maximum lot coverage of 36 percent, whereas the By-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to construct an addition and reconstruct a ground floor porch and second storey balcony. Input from other sources was received from the Applicant, City’s Engineering Services, City’s Building Services Section, the Toronto and Region Conservation Area (TRCA) and three area residents. In support of the application, the applicant identified that the variances are to permit minor additions and reconstruction of existing decks and balconies. Hamzeh Bagheri, agent, was present to represent the application. One area resident was present in objection to the application. The agent stated that four of the variances were inherited from the previous owner. In response to questions from Committee members, the agent said the homeowner had started construction and that he had advised them to stop. City Development staff confirmed the variances identified in the Notice of Hearing are required for the proposal before the Committee for consideration. The agent clarified that they are extending the first floor to become flush with the exterior of the second and third floor. The front porch floorplan will be reduced. Some vegetation will be cleaned up during construction. -4- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, September 11, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 5 of 11 Moved by Rick Van Andel That application MV 53/24 by D. Yapa, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed first storey addition, front porch, and second storey balcony, as generally sited, and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated September 11, 2024). Motion Lost Moved by Omar Ha-Redeye Seconded by Denise Rundle That application MV 53/24 by D. Yapa, be Refused on the grounds that the requested variances are not minor in nature, not desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Vote: Omar Ha-Redeye in favour Sakshi Sood Joshi in favour Denise Rundle in favour Rick Van Andel opposed Sean Wiley opposed 4.3 MV 54/24 A. & F. Lorefice 1995 Glendale Drive The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 7874/21, to permit: • an accessory building (cabana) with a maximum height of 4.6 metres, whereas the By-law permits accessory buildings with a maximum height of 3.5 metres; and • a maximum lot coverage of 35.1 percent, whereas the By-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 25 percent. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to construct an accessory building (cabana) in the rear yard. -5- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, September 11, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 6 of 11 Input from other sources was received from the Applicant, City’s Engineering Services, and the City’s Building Services Section. In support of the application, the applicant identified that the size and scale of the structure is similar to other structures on neighbouring properties and fits within the context of the neighbourhood Daniel Venturuzzo, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Omar Ha-Redeye Seconded by Rick Van Andel That application MV 54/24 by A. & F. Lorefice, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the proposed accessory building (cabana), as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2 & 3 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated September 11, 2024). Carried Unanimously 4.4 MV 55/24 Purolator Inc. 1075 Squires Beach Road The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, to permit front yard parking be limited to 107 percent (64 parking spaces) of the total required parking, whereas the By-law limits front yard parking to 20 percent (12 parking spaces) of the total required parking. The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to obtain Site Plan approval to expand on-site parking. Input from other sources was received from the Applicant, City’s Engineering Services, and the City’s Building Services Section. In support of the application, the applicant identified that the current Zoning By-law does not recognize Through Lots. As a result, this lot technically has two front yards, even though the Squires Beach yard looks and functions like a front yard and the Copperstone yard looks and functions as a rear yard. -6- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, September 11, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 7 of 11 Martin Hoek and Darcy Gordon, applicants, and Doug Stiles, agent, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. The agent made a brief presentation in support of the application. The agent stated they require more parking due to operational needs. The applicant stated they are currently renting the property next door to provide more parking for staff and customers. In response to a question from a Committee member the agent confirmed there will be landscaping along the frontage of Copperstone Drive. After reading the report and being satisfied with the landscaping proposed around the parking lot area, Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Omar Ha-Redeye That application MV 55/24 by Purolator Inc., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance applies only to the proposed development, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2 & 3 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated September 11, 2024). Carried Unanimously 4.5 MV 56/24 J. Rasiah, S. Jegatheeswaran & T. Jegatheeswaran 813 Fairview Avenue The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-laws 7610/18 and 7872/21 to permit: • a maximum dwelling depth of 20.5 metres for a lot with lot depth less than 40.0 metres, whereas the By-law permits a maximum dwelling depth of 17.0 metres for lots with depths less than 40.0 metres; and • a maximum front yard setback of 6.8 metres, whereas the By-law permits a maximum front yard setback of 5.7 metres. -7- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, September 11, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 8 of 11 The applicant requests approval of this minor variance application to construct a two-storey detached dwelling. Input from other sources was received from the Applicant, City’s Engineering Services, and the City’s Building Services Section. In support of the application, the applicant identified that the existing location of the adjacent dwellings front yard setbacks and where they are currently located makes it difficult to comply with the requirements of the front yard setback and building depth. Yaso Somalingam, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Moved by Rick Van Andel Seconded by Sakshi Sood Joshi That application MV 56/24 by J. Rasiah, S. Jegatheeswaran & T. Jegatheeswaran, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the detached dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans. Carried Unanimously 4.6 MV 57/24 N., S. & J. Singh 2729 Sapphire Drive The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-laws 7364/14 and 7857/21, to permit a deck to encroach into any required rear yard to a maximum of 3.2 metres, whereas the By-law permits a deck to encroach into any required rear yard a maximum of 2.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of the variance to obtain a building permit to construct a rear yard deck. Input from other sources was received from the Applicant, City’s Engineering Services, City’s Building Services Section and two area residents. In support of the application, the applicant identified that the space in the rear yard is not enough to support a comfortable deck size within the allowed by-law setback. -8- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, September 11, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 9 of 11 Rajeev Mattai, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. The agent commented that they are looking for this relief to have more usable space, he has a large rear yard that is on a hill and where the deck is proposed is the only flat space they have to build on. A Committee member commented that the property backs on to a greenspace and they only have one immediate neighbour. Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Omar Ha-Redeye That application MV 57/24 by N., S. & J. Singh, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance applies only to the rear yard deck, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, 4 & 5). Carried Unanimously 4.7 MV 58/24 J. & T. O’Leary 730 Kingfisher Drive The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended, to permit uncovered steps and platforms not exceeding 2.5 metres in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.0 metre into the required flankage side yard, whereas the By-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.0 metre into any required side yard. The applicant requests approval of this variance to obtain occupancy in the newly built Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU). Input from other sources was received from the Applicant, City’s Engineering Services, and the City’s Building Services Section. In support of the application, the applicant identified that an error in the original permit process has created the need for an exterior landing and stairs that will encroach into the required setback. -9- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, September 11, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 10 of 11 JD O’Leary, applicant, and Peter Barton, agent, were present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. The applicant stated they require a variance so that the stairs to the ADU meet the building code. Originally the ADU was designed as an in-law suite. Moved by Rick Van Andel Seconded by Sakshi Sood Joshi That application MV 58/24 by J. & T. O’Leary, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That this variance applies only to the proposed uncovered steps and platforms, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibit 2, 3 & 4 contained in the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated September 11, 2024). Carried Unanimously -10- Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes Wednesday, September 11, 2024 7:00 pm Electronic Hearing Page 11 of 11 5. Adjournment Moved by Rick Van Andel Seconded by Sakshi Sood Joshi That the 9th hearing of the 2024 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 8:15 pm. Carried Unanimously __________________________ Date __________________________ Chair __________________________ Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Please note the Committee of Adjustment Hearings are available for viewing on the City of Pickering YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/user/SustainablePickering -11- Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 62/24 Date: October 9, 2024 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Minor Variance Application MV 62/24 J. Naguleswaran & G. Janahan 1524 Winville Road Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by site-specific By-law 7022/10, to permit a covered deck to have a minimum rear yard setback of 2.5 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 5.0 metres. The applicant requests approval of the variance to obtain a building permit for a rear yard deck. Recommendation For your information and based solely on the application and supporting documentation filed by the applicant, the City Development Department has reviewed the application with respect to Section 45(1) of the Planning Act and considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following condition is recommended: 1. That this variance applies only to the rear yard deck, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, & 4). Background Prior to submitting this minor variance application, the applicant had applied for a building permit on August 19, 2024, and was notified on August 27, 2024, that they do not meet the minimum rear yard setback requirement and must obtain a minor variance to permit the rear yard deck. -12- Report MV 62/24 October 9, 2024 Page 2 Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan The subject property is designated “Urban Residential Areas – Low Density Area” as part of the Duffin Heights Neighbourhood. The requested variance is to permit the proposed rear yard deck on the property, which is permitted within this designation and a common accessory structure within the Duffin Heights neighbourhood. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The requested variance is to decrease the minimum permitted rear yard setback from 5.0 metres to 2.5 metres. The intent of the minimum setback provision is to maintain an appropriate amount of yard space for amenity area and storm drainage uncovered by buildings on a lot and to regulate the scale and size of the building. The required minimum rear yard setback for detached dwellings zoned “S-SD-SA-3” under By-law 7022/10 is 7.0 metres and the required minimum rear yard setback for decks is 5.0 metres. The existing detached dwelling is set back 7.08 metres from the rear yard property line. The rear yard deck will provide sufficient space on the property left uncovered by buildings to accommodate soft landscaping, storm drainage and outdoor amenity area as the required minimum front and side yard setbacks are maintained. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The requested variance is intended to permit a rear yard deck. The deck maintains a rear yard setback similar to the setbacks provided on nearby properties fronting onto Winville Road. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is desirable and appropriate for the development of the land and is minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Applicant • The existing backyard is too small, the deck will add more amenity space for small children. Engineering Services • Ensure the projection of the deck in the rear yard does not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lot and surrounding area. Building Services • The deck was constructed without the benefit of building permit; permit application is on hold until Committee’s decision. -13- Report MV 62/24 October 9, 2024 Page 3 Public Input •Seven letters of support received from residents of Winville Road and Bruny Avenue (letters have been forwarded to the Committee). These letters include four letters from directly adjacent properties. Date of report: October 2, 2024 Comments prepared by: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration Michael David, MES Zoning Technician MD:nr /CityDevDept/D3700/2024/MV 62-24/7. Report/MV62-24 Report.docx Attachments Original Signed by Original Signed by -14- Exhibit 1 ~ I " Zents Drive Brandy Court / Q) ~ Shepway Mews in r C -~ ""O cu Winville Road C 1/) cu ;;: u \ Ql :a: 1/) :, 1/) cu Ol Ql c.. Subject Bruny Avenue Lands "\ r---\ t--) ~ > ~ > >< ::! ~ > > :, I-------' " co 1/) Winville Road ::0 0 Q) ~\ 0. \ \ \ Q) Edgecroft Drive ·E 0 Ql C 1/) cu ;;: .J Ql (.) :a: I J t -"' cu ~ I Elmsley Drive I ( R Iv ~ I I I af:j of Location Map File: MV 62/24 PlCKERlNG Applicant: J. Naguleswaran & G. Janahan City Development Municipal Address: 1524 Winville Road @ The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: Date: Sep. 09, 2024 Department @ Queens Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.,@ Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;@ Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its SCALE: 1:2,000 I suppliers. All rights reserved.,@ Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its suppliers. All rights reserved. THIS ISNOTAPLANOF SURVEY. L:\PLANNING\01-MapFiles\MV\2024\MV 60--24\MV 60--24.aprx -15- Exhibit 2 Submitted Plan File No: MV 62/24 Applicant: J. Naguleswaran & G. Janahan Municipal Address: 1524 Winville Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: Sept. 18, 2024 to permit a rear yard setback of 2.5 metres for a covered deck -16- Exhibit 3 East Elevation File No: MV 62/24 Applicant: J. Naguleswaran & G. Janahan Municipal Address: 1524 Winville Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Sept. 18, 2024 5.65 metre height to midpoint of roof of covered deck 3.0 metre height to platform of deck -17- Exhibit 4 3D View File No: MV 62/24 Applicant: J. Naguleswaran & G. Janahan Municipal Address: 1524 Winville Road CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Sept. 18, 2024. -18- Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: MV 63/24 Date: October 9, 2024 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Minor Variance Application MV 63/24 J. & L. Juan 1804 Dencourt Drive Application The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by site-specific By-law 1929/84, to permit a maximum lot coverage of 42 percent. The applicant requests approval of the variance to obtain a building permit for a rear yard deck. Recommendation For your information and based solely on the application and supporting documentation filed by the applicant, the City Development Department has reviewed the application with respect to Section 45(1) of the Planning Act and considers the requested variance to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following condition is recommended: 1.That this variance applies only to the rear yard deck, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, & 4). Background Prior to submitting this minor variance application, the applicant applied for a building permit on August 12, 2024, and was notified on September 9, 2024, that they do not meet the maximum lot coverage requirement and must obtain a minor variance to permit the rear yard deck. -19- Report MV 63/24 October 9, 2024 Page 2 Comment Conforms to the Intent of the Official Plan The subject property is designated “Urban Residential Areas – Low Density Area” as part of the Amberlea Neighbourhood. The requested variance is to permit the proposed rear yard deck on the property, which is permitted within this designation and a common accessory structure within the Amberlea neighbourhood. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan. Conforms to the Intent of the Zoning By-law The requested variance is to increase the maximum permitted lot coverage from 38 percent to 42 percent. The intent of the maximum lot coverage provision is to maintain an appropriate amount of yard space for amenity area and storm drainage uncovered by buildings on a lot and to regulate the scale and size of the building. The existing detached dwelling is already at the maximum lot coverage requirement of 38 percent. The rear yard deck will provide sufficient space on the property left uncovered by buildings to accommodate soft landscaping, storm drainage and outdoor amenity area as the required minimum front and side yard setbacks are maintained. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Desirable for the Appriopriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The requested variance is intended to permit a rear yard deck. The deck will maintain a rear yard setback and lot coverage like those provided on nearby properties. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance is desirable and appropriate for the development of the land and is minor in nature. Input From Other Sources Applicant •The deck is needed to provide rear yard access from the main floor since there is a grade change from the main floor to the backyard. Engineering Services •Ensure the projection of the deck in the rear yard does not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lot and surrounding area. Building Services •No concerns from Building Services; permit application is on hold until Committee’s decision. Public Input •No public input has been received as of the completion of this report. -20- Report MV 63/24 October 9, 2024 Page 3 Date of report: October 3, 2024 Comments prepared by: Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration Michael David, MES Zoning Technician MD:nr /CityDevDept/D3700/2024/MV 63-24/7. Report/MV63-24 Report.docx Attachments Original Signed by Original Signed by -21- Fernam S t r e e t Charnwood Cour t Ashfield Court Wi l d f l o w e r D r i v e Si l v e r M a p l e D r i v e Br o a d o a k C r e s c e n t Ro s e b a n k R o a d Woodsmere Crescent Summerpark Crescent Strouds Lane Sp r i n g v i e w D r i v e Dencourt Drive Post Drive Greenvale Crescent Altona ForestPublic School St. ElizabethSeton Catholic School Location MapFile:Applicant:Municipal Address: MV 63/24 Date: Oct. 03, 2024 Exhibit 1 ¯ E J. & L. Juan 1804 Dencourt Drive SubjectLands L:\PLANNING\01-MapFiles\MV\2024\MV 63-24\MV63-24_LocationMap.mxd 1:2,500 SCALE:THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. © The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: © King's Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; © His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, Department ofNatural Resources. All rights reserved.; © Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers. All rights reserved.; © Municipal PropertyAssessment Corporation and its suppliers. All rights reserved. City DevelopmentDepartment -22- Exhibit 2 Submitted Plan File No: MV 63/24 Applicant: J.& L. Juan Municipal Address: 1804 Dencourt Drive CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: Sept. 19, 2024 to permit a maximum lot coverage of 42 percent Dencourt Drive -23- Ex h i b i t 3 So u t h E l e v a t i o n Fi l e N o : MV 6 3/2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : J. & L . J u a n Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 18 0 4 D e n c o u r t D r iv e CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S PL A N . Da t e : Se p t . 1 9 , 2 0 2 4 1. 1 m e t r e he i g h t t o pl a t f o r m o f de c k -24- Ex h i b i t 4 De c k F l o o r P l a n Fi l e N o : MV 6 3/2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : J. & L . J u a n Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 18 0 4 D e n c o u r t D r iv e CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : Se p t . 1 9 , 2 0 2 4 -25- Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Numbers: MV 64/24 to MV 67/24 Date: October 9, 2024 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Minor Variance Applications MV 64/24 to MV 67/24 14532970 Canada Inc. & 14513703 Canada Inc. 145 & 151 Twyn Rivers Drive Applications MV 64/24 – 145 & 151 Twyn Rivers Drive (Parts 3 & 8) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-laws 7874/21 and 7902/22, to permit: • a minimum lot frontage of 16.4 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres; • a minimum front yard setback of 7.5 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 35.3 metres; • a minimum side yard (south) setback of 1.2 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.8 metres; • a minimum flankage yard setback of 2.0 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum flankage yard setback of 4.5 metres; and • a maximum lot coverage of 36.4 percent, whereas the By-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. MV 65/24 – 145 & 151 Twyn Rivers Drive (Parts 4 & 9) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-laws 7874/21 and 7902/22, to permit: • a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres; • a minimum side yard (north and south) setback of 1.2 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.8 metres; and • a maximum lot coverage of 34.1 percent, whereas the By-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. -26- Report MV 64/24 to MV 67/24 October 9, 2024 Page 2 MV 66/24 – 145 & 151 Twyn Rivers Drive (Parts 5 & 10) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 7874/21 and 7902/22, to permit: • a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres; • a minimum side yard setback (north and south) of 1.2 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.8 metres; and • a maximum lot coverage of 33.8 percent, whereas the By-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. MV 67/24 – 145 & 151 Twyn Rivers Drive (Parts 6 & 11) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 7874/21 and 7902/22, to permit: • a minimum lot frontage of 15.2 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 18.0 metres; • a minimum front yard setback of 9.5 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 35.3 metres; • a minimum side yard setback (north and south) of 1.2 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.8 metres; and • a maximum lot coverage of 33.7 percent, whereas the By-law requires a maximum lot coverage of 33 percent. The applicant requests approval of these minor variance applications to permit the reduction in minimum lot frontages allowing the severance of the two properties resulting in a total of four lots and to construct a detached dwelling on each of the lots for a total of four detached dwellings. Recommendation The City Development Department recommends that Minor Variance Applications MV 64/24 to MV 67/24 be Deferred to the November 13, 2024, Committee of Adjustment hearing for the City Development Department to provide proper public notice regarding the requested variances. Background On October 1, 2024, the City Development Department was notified that a required variance for the south side yard setback for MV 64/24 was missing from the Public Notice, which was mailed out on September 23, 2024. -27- Report MV 64/24 to MV 67/24 October 9, 2024 Page 3 The proposed south side yard setback for the dwelling is 1.2 metres, whereas the Zoning By- law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.8 metres. This deficiency was not captured in the public notices issued for this Committee of Adjustment hearing. City Development staff is requesting that these applications be deferred to the November 13, 2024 Committee of Adjustment hearing to allow proper public notice to be issued. Date of report: October 2, 2024 Comments prepared by: Original Signed By Original Signed By Kerry Yelk Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner II Manager, Zoning & Administration KY:nr /CityDevDept/D3700/2024/MV 64-24 to MV 67-24/7. Report/Deferral/MV 64-24 - MV 67-24 - Deferal.docx -28- Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Number: LD 14/24 Date: October 9, 2024 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Consent Application LD 14/24 15881943 Canada Inc. 235 Twyn Rivers Drive Application The applicant is proposing to sever a 1,170.6 square metre parcel of land (Part 2), retaining a 1,170.6 square metre parcel of land (Part 1). The existing dwelling is proposed to be demolished. Recommendation Staff have reviewed Consent Application LD 14/24, with respect to Section 51(24) of the Planning Act criteria and have no objections to the consent application, subject to the conditions outlined within Appendices I, II & III. Comments Official Plan The subject lands are designated “Urban Residential Area - Low Density Areas” under the Pickering Official Plan, which permits residential uses. The subject lands are located within the Rougemount Neighbourhood. There are no specific development guidelines for the Rougemount Neighbourhood. Furthermore, the subject lands are not within the boundaries of an Established Neighbourhood Precinct. Zoning By-law The subject lands are zoned “Detached Dwelling, Third Density Zone - R3” under Zoning By-law 3036, as amended: Lots Required Lot Area (m2) Proposed Lot Area (m2) Required Lot Frontage (m) Proposed Lot Frontage (m) Retained Parcel (Part 1) 550.0 1,170.6 18.0 21.34 Severed Parcel (Part 2) 550.0 1,170.6 18.0 21.34 The proposed lots appear to comply with the minimum lot frontage and lot area requirements of the Zoning By-law and staff are satisfied that the proposed severance is appropriate. -29- Report LD 14/24 October 9, 2024 Page 2 Input From Other Sources Engineering Services •Conditions of approval are attached hereto as Appendix II. Building Services •No concerns from Building Services; Building Permit is required prior construction. Region of Durham Planning and Works Departments •Conditions of approval are attached hereto as Appendix III. Toronto Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) •TRCA staff have no objection to the approval of Consent Application LD 14/24 subject to the issuance of a TRCA permit. Public Input •As of the date of writing this report, no written submission was received from the public. Date of report: October 2, 2024 Comments prepared by: Ziya Cao Planner II ZC:nr /CityDevDept/D3500/2024/LD 14-24/8. Report/LD 14-24 Report.docx Attachments Original Signed by Original Signed by Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration -30- Fawndale Road Hoover Drive Al t o n a R o a d Twyn Rivers Drive Lawson Street Waterford Gate Littleford Street WilcroftCourt Oa k b u r n S t r e e t Fo r e s t v i e w D r i v e Starview Court Rougemount Drive Fiddlers Court Sheppard Avenue Ca s t l e S t r e e t Wo o d v i e w A v e n u e Ro u g e V a l l e y D r i v e Richardson StreetWo o d v i e w D r i v e Stover Crescent G r a n b y C o u r t Howell Crescent RougeValleyPark WoodviewTotLot Elizabeth B.Phin PublicSchool St. Monica'sSeparateSchool Location MapFile:Applicant:Municipal Address: LD 14/24 Date: Jul. 24, 2024 ¯ E 15881943 Canada Inc. 235 Twyn Rivers Drive SubjectLands L:\PLANNING\01-MapFiles\LD\2024\LD 14-24 V. Rajalingam\LD 014-2023_LocationMap.mxd 1:4,000 SCALE:THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. © The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: © King's Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; © His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, Department ofNatural Resources. All rights reserved.; © Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers. All rights reserved.; © Municipal PropertyAssessment Corporation and its suppliers. All rights reserved. City DevelopmentDepartment Exhibit 1 -31- Exhibit 2 Submitted Draft R-Plan File No: LD 14/24 Applicant: 15881943 Canada Inc. Municipal Address: 235 Twyn Rivers Drive CONTACT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR DIGITAL COPIES OF THIS PLAN. Date: September 18, 2024 Twyn Rivers Drive Retained Parcel 1,170.6 m2 Severed Parcel 1,170.6 m2 -32- Ex h i b i t 3 Su b m i t t e d Si t e Pl a n Fi l e N o : LD 14 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : 15 8 8 1 9 4 3 C a n a d a I n c . Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 23 5 T w y n R i v e r s D r i v e FU L L S C A L E C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N A R E A V A I L A B L E F O R V I E W I N G A T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y DE V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T . Da t e : Oc t o b e r 1 , 2 0 2 4 Twyn River Drive -33- Appendix I October 9, 2024 Recommended Conditions of Approval for Consent LD 14/24 The City Development Department has reviewed the above application and provides the following conditions, to be fulfilled by the applicant/owner: 1. Submit one copy of a Draft Reference Plan to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering, prior to depositing the plan with the Land Registry Office, that confirms the dimensions of the proposed retained and severed parcels, and that a survey be submitted showing the location of any buildings and structures located thereon. 2. Submit one copy of a Deposited Reference Plan, to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering, upon completion of Condition 1 above. 3. Ensure that any zoning non-compliances identified through Condition 1 above, resulting from the proposed severance, be brought into compliance. 4. Ensure that any existing structure(s) on severed parcel or that straddle both the retained and severed parcels are removed and that all inspections have been completed. 5. Provide a certified cheque, made payable to the City of Pickering for cash-in lieu of parkland for each newly created lots. The parkland fee shall be in accordance with the City’s General Municipal Fees By-law in effect at the date of such payment (the current amount is $7,635.00 per each newly created lot). 6. Coordinate with the City of Pickering, City Development Department to assign an appropriate municipal address for the retained and severed parcels. 7. That the consent be subject to the following periods: • Last day for fulfilling Conditions is October 9, 2026. • Expiry Date of Application LD 14/24 is November 9, 2026. Upon fulfillment of these conditions the applicant must submit a cheque payable to the City of Pickering in the amount of $1,110.00 for the stamping of the deed package, to be prepared and submitted by a lawyer. Clearing Agencies 1. Prior to the signing of the certificate by the Secretary-Treasurer that the consent has been given, the Secretary-Treasurer is to be advised in writing by the City Planning Department that Conditions #1 to #5 have been carried out to its satisfaction. -34- Appendix I Page 2 of 2 2. Prior to the signing of the certificate by the Secretary-Treasurer that the consent has been given, the Secretary-Treasurer is to be advised in writing by the City Engineering Services Department that the Conditions in Appendix II have been carried out to its satisfaction. 3. Prior to the signing of the certificate by the Secretary-Treasurer that the consent has been given, the Secretary-Treasurer is to be advised in writing by the Regional Planning and Economic Development Department that the Conditions in Appendix III have been carried out to its satisfaction. 4. Prior to the signing of the certificate by the Secretary-Treasurer that the consent has been given, the Secretary-Treasurer is to be advised in writing by Regional Works Department that the Conditions in Appendix III have been carried out to its satisfaction. 5. Prior to the signing of the certificate by the Secretary-Treasurer that the consent has been given, the Secretary-Treasurer is to be satisfied that the time periods outlined in Condition #7 have been adhered to. Advisory Comments 1. Once all conditions contained in the Committee's Decision are fully satisfied by the applicant, the applicant’s solicitor must prepare and forward the legal document(s) with the applicable stamping fee to the City of Pickering Committee of Adjustment office, to the attention of the Secretary-Treasurer for review and approval with stamping. The document(s) will be returned to the solicitor for registration purposes. Failing receipt by the Secretary-Treasurer of the Deed Package by the requisite date, the application shall be deemed expired and shall lapse. -35- Memo To: Ziya Cao September 24, 2024 Planner II From: Paal Helgesen Division Head, Water Resources & Development Services Copy: Manager, Zoning & Administration Supervisor, Development Approvals Subject: Land Division Application LD 14/2024 -15881943 Canada Inc. -235 Twyn Rivers Drive File: D-4400 Water Resources & Development Services has reviewed the above application and provide the following conditions: 1.We have reviewed the draft reference plan and provide the following comments: a.Revise the plan from 65R to 40R. b.Update the street name to Twyn Rivers Drive. c.A 3.05 widening on Twyn Rivers Drive fronting the site (Part 1 and Part 2) will be required to be dedicated to the City of Pickering as per condition below. Ensure this is shown on the plan. 2.As a condition of severance, the applicant will be required to provide a 3.05m widening on Twyn Rivers Drive fronting the site. The widening is to be dedicated to the City of Pickering and established as public highway. 3.The applicant will be required to provide an Engineering Review Fee of $1,700.00 for the two proposed lots, and a fee of $2,265.00 for the clearance of Water Resources & Development Services conditions. A cheque, payable to the City of Pickering, in the amount of $3,965.00 will be required. 4.As a condition of severance, the applicant must pay to the City $289.39 (2475.00/hectare) for their Stormwater Maintenance Fee. Appendix II -36- September 24, 2024 Page 2 of 3 Land Division Application LD 14/2024 5. A preliminary grading and drainage plan will be required as a condition of severance. It must contain sufficient information regarding existing and proposed grades such that it can be adequately determined that development of this property will not adversely affect adjacent properties. The plan must illustrate Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Measures for the proposed lots, including, but not limited to, amended topsoil, permeable pavers on the driveway, infiltration galleries, and rain gardens. The plan should indicate existing vegetation/trees within and adjacent to the property that may be affected. The plan should indicate the proposed driveway locations and existing utilities within the boulevard. Relocation of utilities will be the applicant’s responsibility. 6. The City requires a stormwater management brief to be submitted for review. Refer to the City of Pickering Stormwater Management Design Guidelines for the design requirements and standards. The brief shall address the following design criteria: • Quantity control must control post development flows for all storm events up to the 100- year event, to the pre-development levels. The pre-development flows shall be determined using ‘old’ IDF parameters (A=2464, B=16, C=1) and runoff coefficient of 0.3. • Quality control must meet an Enhanced level of protection (80% TSS removal) using Low Impact Developments (LIDs). • Erosion control shall satisfy 5mm minimum retention/infiltration on-site using LIDs. LID measures shall be designed in accordance with the TRCA & CVC LID SWM Planning & Design Guide and the City’s SWM Design Guidelines. Refer to the attached typical roof water infiltration trench detail. All proposed LID measures must be located solely on private property and must be owned and maintained by the property owner. All necessary information regarding the function and maintenance of LID must be included in the purchase agreements. A Section 119 Restrictive Covenant is to be registered on title prohibiting the alteration or removal of the LID measures. • A minimum 450mm depth of amended soils should be specified for all grassed areas such as back yards, front yards and side yards. Add appropriate notes on the Site Grading Plan. • Flow collecting in foundation drains shall be pumped to infiltration systems/soakaway pits using a sump pump. 7. A Tree Inventory and Protection/Removal Plan, prepared by a qualified Arborist or an Environmental Consultant is required. This information should address matters such as existing tree species, diameter, health, protection/removal strategies, and a proposed replanting plan. The report shall also include any trees on adjacent lands that may be impacted by the proposed construction. Compensation for loss of tree canopy will be required and is over and above any required boulevard tree as per the Boulevard Tree Planting Program. -37- September 24, 2024 Page 3 of 3 Land Division Application LD 14/2024 8. Planting of one boulevard tree is required for each new lot being created. Where the planting of a boulevard tree is not possible, cash-in-lieu is to be provided as per the current Development Services Fee Schedule. PH:jl Attachments 2024 DS User Fees P-1020 Typical Res. Roof Water Infiltration Trench -38- If you require this information in an accessible format, please contact Planning Reception or call 1-800- 372-1102 extension 2548. The Regional Municipality of Durham Planning and Economic Development Department 605 Rossland Rd. E. Level 4 PO Box 623 Whitby, ON L1N 6A3 Canada 905-668-7711 1-800-372-1102 Email: planning@durham.ca durham.ca Brian Bridgeman, MCIP, RPP, PLE Commissioner of Planning and Economic Development October 1, 2024 Ziya Chao, Planner II Zoning & Administration City Development Department City of Pickering One the Esplanade Pickering, ON L1V 6K7 Re: Application for Consent LD 014/2024 Regional File No.: LD 093/2024 Applicants: Paul Demczak c/o Batory Planning & Management Location: 235 Twyn Rivers Drive Municipality: City of Pickering Hearing Date: October 9, 2024 RECOMMENDATION: That application LD 014/2024 be approved, subject to the following conditions: i). That the Property Owner/Authorized Agent complete and sign the Region’s Site Screening Questionnaire for the subject lands in accordance with Durham Region’s Soil and Groundwater Assessment Protocol; and ii). That the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Region of Durham Planning Division that any required noise abatement measures and warning clauses from the Noise Impact Study, prepared by SS Wilson Associates, dated May 30, 2024, for the subject lands be implemented through a site plan/development agreement with the City of Pickering or alternatively, through a Land Titles agreement with the Region of Durham. 1.PURPOSE The purpose of this application is to permit the severance of a 1171.20 m2 residential parcel of land while retaining a 1169.24 m2 residential parcel of land. The existing residential detached dwelling is to be demolished. Appendix III -39- -2- 2. PLANNING ANALYSIS Conformity to the Regional Official Plan (Envision Durham) The Regional Official Plan (Envision Durham) was approved as modified by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing on September 3, 2024. The subject site is designated as Community Area on Map 1 of the ROP. Community Areas are intended to support complete communities, providing a range of housing, transportation and lifestyle choices. The proposed consent applications will facilitate the creation of one new residential lot and a retained lot. The proposed lots are intended for the development of two two-storey dwellings within an existing residential community. The proposed severance application conforms with the policies of the ROP by meeting housing objectives and by capitalizing on existing infrastructure. The application appears to conform to the new ROP. However, in accordance with Policy 11.3.10 of Envision Durham, severances cannot be granted that are contrary to the new ROP and/or any area municipal official plan. As such, full conformity to the new ROP will be determined once a final decision has been issued by the area municipality confirming that the retained and severed parcels comply with the requirements of the area municipality’s zoning by-law. 3. PROVINCIAL PLANS AND POLICIES Provincial Policy Statement The PPS supports the optimization of land and resources by promoting opportunities for intensification and redevelopment. The subject site is located within a settlement area, which promotes infill development and where existing infrastructure, and public service facilities will be utilized. Ontario has released the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024. This is a new streamlined provincial planning document that will replace the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe 2019, as amended in 2020. The PPS, 2024 directs planning authorities to support the achievement of complete communities, by accommodating an appropriate range and mix of land uses, a range and mix of housing options, and other uses to meet long-term needs. The proposed development is considered infill within a designated settlement area and makes use of existing infrastructure. As such, -40- -3- the application appears to be consistent with the PPS. Growth Plan The Growth Plan requires that a minimum of 50 per cent of all residential development occurring annually in the Region must be within the “Built-up Area”. The Growth Plan also requires all intensification areas to support vibrant neighbourhoods by providing a diverse and compatible mix of land uses, including residential and employment uses and convenient access to local stores, services, and public service facilities. The subject site is within an established neighbourhood in the City of Pickering. The proposal will help contribute to the achievement of more compact complete communities and will help meet the City’s and Region’s intensification targets. The proposed severance conforms to the Growth Plan. 4. DELEGATED PROVINCIAL PLAN REVIEW RESPONSIBILITIES Region’s Site-Screening Questionnaire The applicant submitted a Site-Screening Questionnaire (SSQ) signed by a Qualified Person (QP). The proposed application will facilitate the creation of a new residential lot, therefore, we will require the SSQ to also be signed by the Property Owner or Authorized Agent for the subject lands in accordance with the Durham Region’s Soil and Groundwater Assessment Protocol. Noise Impact Study The subject site is located on Twyn Rivers Drive, a designated Type ‘C’ arterial road. The applicant has submitted a Noise Impact Study prepared by SS Wilson Associates, dated May 30, 2024. The Region has reviewed the Noise study and provide the following comments: This Detailed Noise Control Study examines sound levels from the projected traffic volumes on Twyn Rivers Drive (a Type C Arterial in the Regional Official Plan) and rail noise from the nearby CNR. Noise barriers are not required for the Outdoor Living Areas (OLAs) due mainly low-level traffic volumes and the dwelling itself acting as a sound barrier for the rear yard (OLA). Sound levels at the façade of the dwellings will result in a requirement for mandatory Central Air Conditioning. The appropriate Warning Clauses are recommended, including additional Warning Clauses with respect to sound levels from the nearby railway (C.N.R.) and a clause warning prospective buyers of noise from the nearby existing school. These clauses are recommended to be -41- -4- included in the City’s Development Agreements and Offers of Sale and Purchase. This Detailed Noise Control Study uses the appropriated Traffic Data that was obtained from the Region of Durham Planning Division and the C.N.R. In general, this Noise Control Study is considered acceptable to the Region of Durham Planning Department. We will require the noise control measures to be included in the related City of Pickering’s Site Plan Agreement. Should the City not require a Site Plan Agreement, the applicant will be required to enter into a Section 71 Land Title Agreement with the Region to address the noise requirement. 5. AGENCY COMMENTS Regional Works Department The Regional Works Department has indicated that they have no objection to the approval of the consent application subject to the applicant fulfilling the conditions outlined in their comment letter, dated August 27, 2024. 6. CONCLUSION The proposed application will permit the creation of a new residential lot to accommodate two new single detached dwellings. We have no concern with the proposed application. Yours truly, Lauren Raney Lauren Raney Planning Analyst Attachment: 1. Regional Works comments cc: Grant Young, Regional Works Department -42- The Regional Municipality of Durham Works Department 605 Rossland Rd. E. PO Box 623 Whitby, ON L1N 6A3 Canada 905-668-7711 1-800-372-1102 Fax: 905-668-2051 E-mail: works@durham.ca www.durham.ca August 27, 2024 Planning and Economic Development Regional Municipality of Durham 605 Rossland Road East, 4th Floor P.O. Box 623 Whitby, ON L1N 6A3 Sent via Planit Attention: Lino Trombino Re: LD 093/2024 (LD 14/24) 15881943 Canada Inc. 253 Twyn Rivers Drive City of Pickering Please be advised that our department has no objection to the granting of approval for the above noted severance application. The application is for the consent to server one residential parcel of land retaining one residential parcel of land with an existing dwelling to be demolished. As a condition of approval for this application, the applicant will be required to pay to the Region the flat rate costs for the installation of one water service connection and one sanitary sewer service connection. The applicant may also require the installation of a storm sewer connection as a condition of approval from the City of Pickering. The Region of Durham can also include the installation of the storm connection on behalf of Pickering with the installation of the Regional services. If the Region is installing a new 150mm diameter storm sewer connection, or a replacement water service we will require a deposit of $15,000.00 per connection. To ensure the foregoing, our department requires our following standard condition to be imposed: “That the applicant satisfies all the requirements of the Regional Municipality of Durham concerning the provision of Regional services, financial and otherwise.” In order to satisfy the Regional Works Department conditions, the applicant will be required to fulfill the following: Payment for one 100mm sanitary service connection at $4,035.00 per connection (flat rate): = $4,035.00 Payment for one 19mm water service connection at $3,885.00 per connection (flat rate): = $3,885.00 -43- LD 093/2024 235 Twyn Rivers Drive City of Pickering Page 2 of 2 Payment for 1 existing water service inspection at $131.00 per service: = $131.00 Payment for 1 existing water service inspection at $131.00 per service: = $131.00 The total amount owing at the current rate is $8,182.00. Payment shall be made by certified cheque or credit card. The above fees are subject to revision on January 1, 2025. Regional connection permits will be issued to the applicant once the above payment is remitted to our department. The severed land will be subject to Regional development charges at the time of building permit issuance. The Region of Durham will not permit the connection of weeping tiles to the sanitary sewer for the severed and retained lands in accordance with the Region’s Foundation Drain Policy. In the event you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, Grant Young, C.E.T. Development Approvals Technician grant.young@durham.ca 905 668 7711 extension 2479 If this information is required in an accessible format, please contact 1-800-372-1102 ext. 3753. -44- Report to Committee of Adjustment Application Numbers: LD 15/24, MV 60/24 & MV 61/24 Date: October 9, 2024 From: Deborah Wylie Manager, Zoning & Administration Subject: Committee of Adjustment Applications LD 15/24, MV 60/24 and MV 61/24 100017575 Ontario Inc. 1238 Bayview Street Applications Consent Application LD 15/24 proposes the creation of one new lot. The applicant is proposing to sever a 205.8 square metre parcel of land (Part 2), retaining a 205.8 square metre parcel of land (Part 1). The existing dwelling is proposed to be demolished. Requested Variances MV 60/24 – (Retained Parcel – Part 1) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 4139/92, as it relates to the retained lot, to permit: • a minimum front yard setback of 4.2 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 4.5 metres; • a covered porch and associated steps, not exceeding the height of 1.0 metre above grade, to project a maximum of 2.0 metres into the required front yard, whereas the By-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.5 metres into any required front yard; • covered steps, not exceeding the height of 1.0 metre, to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the By-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.5 metres into any required rear yard; • a maximum dwelling height of 10.5 metres, whereas the By-law permits maximum dwelling height of 7.5 metres; and • a maximum lot coverage of 46 percent, whereas the By-law permits maximum dwelling height of 45 percent. -45- Report LD 15/24, MV 60/24 & MV 61/24 October 9, 2024 Page 2 MV 61/24 – (Severed Parcel – Part 2) The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 41239/92, as it relates to the severed lot, to permit: • a minimum front yard setback of 4.2 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 4.5 metres; • a covered porch and associated steps, not exceeding the height of 1.0 metre above grade, to project a maximum of 2.0 metres into the required front yard, whereas the By-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.5 metres into any required front yard; • covered steps, not exceeding the height of 1.0 metre above grade, to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the By-law permits uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade and not projecting more than 1.5 metres into any required rear yard; • a maximum dwelling height of 10.5 metres, whereas the By-law permits maximum dwelling height of 7.5 metres; and • a maximum lot coverage of 46 percent, whereas the By-law permits maximum dwelling height of 45 percent. Recommendations 1. Staff have reviewed Consent Application LD 15/24, with respect to Section 51(24) of the Planning Act criteria and have no objections to the consent application, subject to the conditions outlined within Appendices I, II, III & IV. 2. Staff have reviewed Minor Variance Application MV 60/24 with respect to Section 45(1) of the Planning Act and considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following condition is recommended: i. That these variances apply only to the retained lot (Part 1) and proposed development, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plan (refer to Exhibits 2, 4, 5, 6 & 7). 3. Staff have reviewed Minor Variance Application MV 61/24 with respect to Section 45(1) of the Planning Act and considers the requested variances to be minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law. After considering all public and agency input, should the Committee find merit in this application, the following condition is recommended: -46- Report LD 15/24, MV 60/24 & MV 61/24 October 9, 2024 Page 3 i. That these variances apply only to the severed lot (Part 2) and proposed development, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2, 3, 5, 6 & 7). Comments Consent Application – LD 15/24 Official Plan The subject property is designated Urban Residential Areas – Medium Density Area within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood. This designation primarily provides for residential or related uses at a maximum net residential density of over 30 and up to and including 80 units per net hectare. The severance results in a density of approximately 48.5 units per net hectare. Zoning By-law The subject property is zoned “Single Detached – S-SD-1” under Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 4139/92: Lots Zone Required Lot Area (m2) Proposed Lot Area (m2) Required Lot Frontage (m) Proposed Lot Frontage (m) Retained Parcel (Part 1) S-SD-1 200.0 205.8 7.5 7.6 Severed Parcel (Part 2) S-SD-1 200.0 205.8 7.5 7.6 The proposed severed and retained lots appears to comply with the minimum lot area requirements of the Zoning By-law. Minor Variance Applications – MV 60/24 and MV 61/24 Minimum Front Yard Setback (MV 60/24 & MV 61/24) The Zoning By-law permits a minimum front yard setback of 4.5 metres. A variance to permit a 4.2 metre front yard setback for both dwellings is requested for both the retained lot (Part 1) and severed lot (Part 2). This provision is intended to maintain a consistent setback with abutting properties to mitigate views and privacy concerns and to provide an adequate landscaped area and parking space in the front yards. The proposed garage maintains a 5.3 metre setback and is recessed from the front entrance, which will allow sufficient space to park one vehicle. The proposed front entrance has a front yard setback of 4.2 metres and is generally consistent with the existing development to the east, which ranges in front yard setbacks between 2.9 to 6.5 metres. -47- Report LD 15/24, MV 60/24 & MV 61/24 October 9, 2024 Page 4 Obstruction of Yards (MV 60/24 and MV 61/24) The Zoning By-law permits uncovered steps and platforms, not exceeding a height of 1.0 metre, to project a maximum of 1.5 metres to the required front yard. A variance to permit a covered porch and uncovered steps, not exceeding the height of 1.0 metre, to project a maximum of 2.0 metres into the required front yard is requested for both the retained lot (Part 1) and severed lot (Part 2). This provision's intent is to ensure adequate space is provided as buffer between the structures and street activity and to provide for front yard landscaping. As the Zoning By-law only permits uncovered platform and steps to project into the required yards, a variance to permit the covered porch is required for both lots. The additional projection of the step is also required to accommodate the front grading of the lot, where the grade at the front lot line is lower than the grades of the proposed dwelling. The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) requires a higher minimum main floor elevation due to the flood hazard limit of 76.24 metres. Due to TRCA grading requirements, a required vertical setback from the 76.24 metre elevation, the ground floor is raised higher which requires additional steps to access the front entrance. The front porch maintains the encroachment provision. However, a variance is required to permit the covering and the encroaching uncovered steps. Staff is satisfied that sufficient space can be provided for soft landscaping within the front yard, and appropriate separation will be maintained between the dwelling and the adjacent street. Furthermore, the applicant has proposed two covered steps in the rear yard for both proposed dwellings. The Zoning By-law permits uncovered steps and platforms, not exceeding a height of 1.0 metre, to project a maximum of 1.5 metres to the required rear yard. A variance to permit a covered steps, not exceeding the height of 1.0 metre, to project a maximum of 1.5 metres into the required rear yard is requested for both the retained lot (Part 1) and severed lot (Part 2). A variance is required to permit the covering over the proposed steps. The proposed steps maintain a 7.1 metre rear yard setback. The proposed steps maintain the encroachment provision, however, a variance is required to permit the covering over the proposed steps. The steps are required due to the raised ground floor. Overall, there is sufficient space within the rear yard for privacy and amenity space. Maximum Dwelling Height The Zoning By-law permits a maximum dwelling height of 7.5 metres. A variance to permit a maximum dwelling height of 10.5 metres is requested for both the retained lot (Part 1) and severed lot (Part 2). The intent of the maximum building height of 7.5 metres is to minimize the visual impact of new buildings on the existing streetscape and to ensure new development is compatible with the established built form within the surrounding residential neighbourhood. -48- Report LD 15/24, MV 60/24 & MV 61/24 October 9, 2024 Page 5 Within Zoning By-law 2511, building height is measured as the vertical distance between established grade and, for a flat roof, to the highest point of the roof surface, and for a sloped roof, to the mid-point of the roof. Between grade and the highest point of the roof surfaces, the proposed flat roof dwellings are 10.5 metres. In comparison, the sloped roof dwelling located at 1244A Bayview Street is approximately 7.5 metres to the mid-point of the roof, and approximately 8.8 metres to the top of the roof. Similarly, the sloped roof dwellings located at 1251 and 1249 Bayview Street are approximately 8.4 metres to the mid-point of the roofs, and approximately 10.5 metres to the top of the roofs. On the north side of Bayview Street, the dwellings range between one and two-storey dwellings. On the south side of Bayview Street, seven of the nine dwellings are three-storeys, while the other two dwellings are one and two-storeys. The TRCA has requested a raised ground floor height due to the flood hazard limit at an elevation of 76.2 metres. The applicant has proposed a 0.9 metre height to the ground floor from established grade. Therefore, the applicant has proposed to raise the dwellings while still maintaining three-storey dwellings. The dwellings have also been designed to have no windows along the side dwelling walls, which will further mitigate any overlook impacts on abutting properties (refer to Exhibit 6). Maximum Lot Coverage (Parts 1 & 2) The Zoning By-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 45 percent. A variance to permit a maximum lot coverage of 46 percent is requested for both the retained lot (Part 1) and severed lot (Part 2). The intent of the maximum lot coverage of 45 percent is to maintain an appropriate amount of yard space (for landscaping and amenity areas) uncovered by buildings on a lot. The proposed dwellings account for 43 percent (89.2 square metres) of the total coverage, whereas the front porch and steps account for 3 percent. The proposed dwellings will provide sufficient space on the properties left uncovered for landscaping and amenity areas. The dwellings maintain a rear yard setback of 7.5 metres for amenity space, and the applicant is proposing soft and hard landscaping in the front yard. Desirable for the Appropriate Development of the Land and Minor in Nature The requested variances will facilitate two new lots with a new dwelling on each respective lot. Staff consider the proposal to be desirable for the appropriate development of the land as it will intensify an underutilized site. The proposed dwellings are consistent with the established built form along Bayview Street and within the immediate neighbourhood, which consists primarily of detached dwellings, ranging between one, two and three-storeys. The siting of the proposed dwellings has been designed to maintain a consistent alignment with the adjacent properties with similar setbacks. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are desirable for the appropriate development of the land and are minor in nature. -49- Report LD 15/24, MV 60/24 & MV 61/24 October 9, 2024 Page 6 Input From Other Sources Applicant • The applicant has submitted a cover letter. Please contact the City Development Department to receive a copy of this information at citydev@pickering.ca. Building Services • No concerns from Building Services. Building Permit is required prior construction. Fire Services • No comments on the land division application. Engineering Services (LD 15/24) • Refer to the Engineering Services memo dated September 26, 2024, attached hereto as Appendix II, for conditions of approval for LD 15/24. Engineering Services (MV 60/24 & MV 61/24) • Ensure the reduced front yard setback (if approved with this application) does not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lots and surrounding area. • Ensure the projection of the steps in the front yard and rear yard (if approved with this application) does not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lot and surrounding area. • Ensure the increased lot coverage area (if approved with this application) does not adversely affect the drainage patterns within the lot and surrounding area. • Multiple Low Impact Development measures (such as infiltration galleries with downspout connections, rain gardens and 450mm amended soil) will be required at the Land Division Application stage. • Further comments to be provided through our land division application of initial conditions. -50- Report LD 15/24, MV 60/24 & MV 61/24 October 9, 2024 Page 7 Region of Durham Planning and Works Departments •Refer to the letters dated October 2, 2024,attached hereto as Appendix III, for the conditions of approvals for LD 15/24. Toronto Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) (LD 15/24) •Based on the comments provided, TRCAstaff have no objection to the approval ofConsent Application LD 15/24 subject to thepayment of all outstanding TRCA fees. Public Input •No written submissions have been receivedfrom the public as of the date of writing thisreport. Date of report: October 3, 2024 Comments prepared by: Original Signed By Original Signed By Kerry Yelk Deborah Wylie, MCIP, RPP Planner II Manager, Zoning & Administration KY:jc CityDevDept/D3500/2024/LD 15-24, MV 60-24 & MV 61-24/8. Report/LD 015-24, MV 60-24 & MV 61-24 Report.docx Attachments -51- Browning Avenue Commerce Street Fa i r v i e w A v e n u e Fr o n t R o a d Do u g l a s A v e n u e Bayview Street ProgressFrenchman'sBay East Park Location MapFile:Applicant:Municipal Address: LD 15/24, MV 60/24 & MV 61/24 Date: Aug. 29, 2024 ¯ E 1000117575 Ontario Inc. 1238 Bayview Street SubjectLands L:\PLANNING\01-MapFiles\LD\2024\LD 15-24, MV 60-24 & MV 61-24 1000117575 Ontario Inc\LD 15-24, MV 60-24 & MV 61-24_LocationMap.mxd 1:2,000 SCALE:THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. © The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: © King's Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; © His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, Department ofNatural Resources. All rights reserved.; © Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers. All rights reserved.; © Municipal PropertyAssessment Corporation and its suppliers. All rights reserved. City DevelopmentDepartment Exhibit 1 -52- Ex h i b i t 2 Su b m i t t e d Dr a f t R e f e r e n c e Pl a n Fi l e N o : LD 15 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : 10 0 1 1 7 5 7 5 O n t a r i o I n c . Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 12 3 8 B a y v i e w S t r e e t CO N T A C T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T F O R D I G I T A L C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N . Da t e : Se p t e m b e r 23 , 2 0 2 4 Ba y v i e w S t r e e t ROUGEMOUNT DRIVE Re t a i n e d Pa r c e l (20 5 . 8 m 2) LD 15 /2 4 Co n s e n t t o se v e r a 2 0 5 . 8 s q u a r e m e t r e re s i d e n t i a l p a r c e l o f l a n d ( P a r t 2 ) , r e t a i n i n g a 2 0 5 . 8 s q u a r e m e t r e r e s i d e n t i a l p a r c e l o f la n d ( P a r t s 1 ) . E x i s t i n g dw e l l i n g to b e de m o l i s h e d . Se v e r e d Pa r c e l (20 5 . 8 m 2) -53- Ex h i b i t 3 Su b m i t t e d Si t e P l a n (MV 6 1 / 2 4 - Pa r t 2) Fi l e N o : MV 61/2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : 10 0 0 1 175 7 5 O n t a r i o I n c . Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 12 3 8 B a y v i e w S t r e e t FU L L S C A L E C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N A R E A V A I L A B L E F O R V I E W I N G A T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T . Da t e : Oc t o b e r 2 , 2 0 2 4 Bayview Street MV 60/2 4 – Pa r t 1 to p e r m i t a ma x i m u m dw e l l i n g h e i g h t of 10 . 5 me t r e s to p e r m i t a c o v e r e d p o r c h a n d as s o c i a t e d s t e p s , n o t e x c e e d i n g t h e he i g h t o f 1 . 0 m e t r e a b o v e g r a d e , t o pr o j e c t a m a x i m u m o f 2 . 0 m e t r e s i n t o th e r e q u i r e d f r o n t y a r d to p e r m i t a ma x i m u m l o t co v e r a g e o f 46 pe r c e n t to p e r m i t a ma x i m u m f r o n t y a r d se t b a c k o f 4. 2 me t r e s to p e r m i t co v e r e d st e p s, n o t ex c e e d i n g th e h e i g h t o f 1 .0 me t r e ab o v e g r a d e , t o pr o j e c t a m a x i m u m o f 1. 5 me t r e s i n t o th e r e q u i r e d re a r ya r d -54- Ex h i b i t 4 Su b m i t t e d Si t e P l a n (MV 6 0 / 2 4 - Pa r t 1) Fi l e N o : MV 60/2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : 10 0 0 1 175 7 5 O n t a r i o I n c . Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 12 3 8 B a y v i e w S t r e e t FU L L S C A L E C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N A R E A V A I L A B L E F O R V I E W I N G A T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T . Da t e : Se p t e m b e r 2 3 , 2 0 2 4 Bayview Street MV 61/2 4 – Pa r t 2 to p e r m i t a ma x i m u m dw e l l i n g h e i g h t of 10 . 5 me t r e s to p e r m i t a co v e r e d p o r c h a n d as s o c i a t e d s t e p s , n o t e x c e e d i n g t h e he i g h t o f 1 . 0 m e t r e a b o v e g r a d e , t o pr o j e c t a m a x i m u m o f 2 . 0 m e t r e s i n t o th e r e q u i r e d f r o n t y a r d to p e r m i t a ma x i m u m l o t co v e r a g e o f 46 pe r c e n t to p e r m i t a min im u m f r o n t y a r d se t b a c k o f 4. 2 me t r e s to p e r m i t co v e r e d st e p s, n o t ex c e e d i n g th e h e i g h t o f 1 .0 me t r e ab o v e g r a d e , t o pr o j e c t a m a x i m u m o f 1. 5 me t r e s i n t o th e r e q u i r e d re a r ya r d -55- Exhibit 5 Submitted South Elevation (Front) File No: MV 60/24 & MV 61/24 Applicant: 1000117575 Ontario Inc. Municipal Address: 1238 Bayview Street FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Date: September 23, 2024 -56- Ex h i b i t 6 Su b m i t t e d We s t a n d E a s t El e v a t i o n Fi l e N o : MV 60 /2 4 & M V 6 1 / 2 4 Ap p l i c a n t : 10 0 0 1 175 7 5 O n t a r i o I n c . Mu n i c i p a l A d d r e s s : 12 3 8 B a y v i e w S t r e e t FU L L S C A L E C O P I E S O F T H I S P L A N A R E A V A I L A B L E F O R V I E W I N G A T T H E C I T Y O F P I C K E R I N G C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T . Da t e : Se p t e m b e r 2 3 , 2 0 2 4 Ea s t E l e v a t i o n We s t El e v a t i o n -57- Exhibit 7 Submitted North Elevation (Rear) File No: MV 60/24 & MV 61/24 Applicant: 1000117575 Ontario Inc. Municipal Address: 1238 Bayview Street FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Date: September 23, 2024 -58- Appendix I October 3, 2024 Recommended Conditions of Approval for Consent Application LD 15/24 The City Development Department has reviewed the above application and provides the following conditions, to be fulfilled by the applicant/owner: 1. Submit one copy of a Draft Reference Plan to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering, prior to depositing the plan with the Land Registry Office, that confirms the dimensions of the proposed retained and severed parcels, and that a survey be submitted showing the location of any buildings and structures located thereon. 2. Submit one copy of a Deposited Reference Plan, to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering, upon completion of Condition 1 above. 3. Ensure that any zoning non-compliances identified through Condition 1 above, resulting from the proposed severance, be brought into compliance. 4. Ensure that any existing structure(s) on severed parcel or that straddle both the retained and severed parcels are removed and that all inspections have been completed. 5. Provide a certified cheque, made payable to the City of Pickering for cash-in lieu of parkland for each newly created lots. The parkland fee shall be in accordance with the City’s General Municipal Fees By-law in effect at the date of such payment (the current amount is $7,635.00 per each newly created lot). 6. Coordinate with the City of Pickering, City Development Department to assign an appropriate municipal address for the retained and severed parcels. 7. Provide an acknowledgement that Section 50(3) or 50(5) of the Planning Act shall apply to any subsequent conveyance. Upon fulfillment of these conditions the applicant must submit a cheque payable to the City of Pickering in the amount of $1,110.00 for the stamping of the deed package, to be prepared and submitted by a lawyer. -59- Memo To: Kerry Yelk September 26, 2024 Planner II From: Paal Helgesen Division Head, Water Resources & Development Services Copy: Manager, Zoning & Administration Supervisor, Development Approvals Subject: Land Division Application LD 15/2024 -1000117575 Ontario Inc. -1238 Bayview Road File: D-4400 Water Resources & Development Services has reviewed the above application and provide the following comments: 1.We have reviewed the deposited reference (40R) plan provided and have no comments. 2.The applicant will be required to provide an Engineering Review Fee of $1,700.00 for the two proposed lots, and a fee of $2,265.00 for the clearance of Water Resources & Development Services conditions. A cheque, payable to the City of Pickering, in the amount of $3,965.00 will be required. 3.As a condition of severance, the applicant must pay to the City $50.94 ($2,475.00/hectare) for their Stormwater Maintenance Fee. 4.A Road Cut Degradation Fee of $42.00/m2 will be required based on the area of asphalt cut required to install any proposed sanitary and/or water service connections. 5.A preliminary grading and drainage plan will be required as a condition of severance. It must contain sufficient information regarding existing and proposed grades such that it can be adequately determined that development of this property will not adversely affect adjacent properties. The plan must illustrate Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Measures for the proposed lots, including, but not limited to, amended topsoil, permeable pavers on the driveway, infiltration galleries, and rain gardens. The plan should indicate existing vegetation/trees within and adjacent to the property that may be affected. The plan should indicate the proposed driveway locations and existing utilities within the boulevard. Relocation of utilities will be the applicant’s responsibility. Appendix II -60- September 26, 2024 Page 2 of 3 Land Division Application LD 15/2024 6. The City requires a stormwater management brief to be submitted for review. The brief shall address the following design criteria: • The proposal shall demonstrate no negative impact to the adjacent private properties. All flows from new properties must be safely conveyed to the lake. • A minimum first 5mm of rainfall shall be retained on the site using Low Impact Development (LID) measures shall be designed in accordance with the TRCA & CVC LID SWM Planning & Design Guide and the City’s SWM Design Guidelines. • All LID measures must be designed in accordance with the Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Planning and Design Guide (CVC, TRCA, 2010). Sizing calculations and design information for all proposed LIDs must be provided in a Stormwater Management Design Brief signed and sealed by a Professional. Locations and details of the proposed measures must be shown on the Site Servicing/Grading Plan. • All proposed LID measures must be located solely on private property and must be owned and maintained by the property owner. All necessary information regarding the function and maintenance of LID must be included in the purchase agreements. A Section 119 Restrictive Covenant is to be registered on title prohibiting the alteration or removal of the LID measures. • A minimum 450mm depth of amended soils shall be specified for all grassed areas such as back yards, front yards, and side yards. Add appropriate notes on the Site Grading Plan. • Foundation/sump pump discharge to the surface or LIDs. 7. A Geotechnical Report is required to support the LID design. 8. A Tree Inventory and Protection/Removal Plan, prepared by a qualified Arborist or an Environmental Consultant is required. This information should address matters such as existing tree species, diameter, health, protection/removal strategies, and a proposed replanting plan. The plan must identify all trees on the subject property and within 3.0m of the lot limits that may be impacted by the proposed development. Compensation for loss of tree canopy will be required in accordance with the City’s Tree Compensation Policy (https://www.pickering.ca/en/city-hall/resources/tree-inventory-preservation-removal- compensation-requirements.pdf) and is over and above any required boulevard tree as per the Boulevard Tree Planting Program. Include the City’s standard tree protection detail and notes on the tree protection plan (see attached). -61- September 26, 2024 Page 3 of 3 Land Division Application LD 15/2024 9. Planting of one boulevard tree is required for each lot. Where the planting of a boulevard tree is not possible, cash-in-lieu is to be provided as per the current Development Services Fee Schedule. PH:mg Attachment 2024 DS User Fees P-1020 Typical Res. Roof Water Infiltration Trench P-1100 Tree Preservation Protection Fencing Detail P-1101 Tree Protection Notes -62- Development Services User Fee or Charge 2023 Fee (Excluding HST) 2024 Proposed Fee (Excluding HST) HST Applicable (Y/N) 2024 Fee Effective Date Miscellaneous Charges Curb Cut – new development not assumed by municipality, infill building permit or industrial/commercial development $50.00 per metre or part thereof with a minimum charge of $335.00 $52.50 per metre or part thereof with a minimum charge of $352.00 Y January 1, 2024 Curb Infill $190.00/m $196.00/m Y January 1, 2024 Sidewalk Repair $180.00/m2 $185.00/m2 Y January 1, 2024 Municipal Consent Fee $460.00/street $475.00/street N January 1, 2024 Stormwater Maintenance Fee $2,400.00/hectare $2,475.00/hectare N January 1, 2024 Cash-in-lieu of water quality treatment $51,000.00/imp.ha $52,530.00/imp.ha N January 1, 2024 Newspaper Box Pad Permit Application $55.00/box $56.65/box N January 1, 2024 Newspaper Box Installation $260.00 - $510.00 $260.00 - $510.00 N No Increase Newspaper Box Annual Maintenance $20.00/box $20.60/box N January 1, 2024 Road Cleaning Contract cost + 10% admin fee Contract cost + 10% admin fee Y No Increase Tree Removal Compensation 1 $575.00/tree to a max of $3,450.00/dwelling unit and $8,500.00/1000 m2 or any part thereof for industrial and commercial developments $600.00/tree to a max of $3,600.00/dwelling unit and $8,750.00/1000 m2 or any part thereof for industrial and commercial developments N January 1, 2024 Pool Enclosure Permit $360.00 $370.80 N January 1, 2024 Lot Grading Review Residential Lot Grading Review Fee $80.00/unit $83.00/unit N January 1, 2024 Infill Building Permit New Construction and/or Foundation Modification (any part thereof) $775.00 $800.00 N January 1, 2024 Addition to existing structure $80.00 $83.00 N January 1, 2024 Damage Deposits Pool $1,000.00 $1,000.00 N No Increase Water/Sewer Connection $1,000.00 $1,000.00 N No Increase Residential Building Permit-Rural up to $4,500.00 up to $4,500.00 N No Increase Residential Building Permit-Urban up to $5,000.00 up to $5,000.00 N No Increase Commercial Building $5,000.00 - 10,000.00 $5,000.00 - 10,000.00 N No Increase Fill/Topsoil Permit One Year Permit $1,100.00 + $1,100.00/hectare to a total maximum fee of $5,500 $1,150.00 + $1,150.00/hectare to a total maximum fee of $5,750.00 N January 1, 2024 One Year Extension $1,100.00 $1,150.00 N January 1, 2024 Penalty & Investigation Fee $5,500.00 $5,750.00 N January 1, 2024 Erosion & Sediment Control Security 100% of estimated cost of Erosion & Sediment Control Measures 100% of estimated cost of Erosion & Sediment Control Measures N No Increase Road Damage Security Paved Road $5,000.00/km $5,000.00/km N No Increase Surface Treat/Gravel Road $10,000.00/km $10,000.00/km N No Increase Subdivision/Development /Road Servicing Agreements Engineering Review Based on total cost of Municipal Works 4 Based on total cost of Municipal Works 4 Engineering Review Fee 2 Detailed Design Package 1.25% with a minimum of $5,500.00 1.25% with a minimum of $5,665.00 N January 1, 2024 Surcharge for 4th Submission of Detailed Design Package (payable at submission) 3 33.3% of total Engineering Design Review Fee with a minimum of $2,700.00 33.3% of total Engineering Design Review Fee with a minimum of $2,780.00 N January 1, 2024 Additional surcharge for Submission of each Detailed Design Package after 4th Submission (payable at submission) 3 20% of total Engineering Design Review Fee with a minimum of $2,700.00 20% of total Engineering Design Review Fee with a minimum of $2,780.00 N January 1, 2024 Inspection Based on total cost of Municipal Works4 Based on total cost of Municipal Works 4 29-63- Development Services User Fee or Charge 2023 Fee (Excluding HST) 2024 Proposed Fee (Excluding HST) HST Applicable (Y/N) 2024 Fee Effective Date <$250,000 8% with a minimum of $5,500 8% with a minimum of $5,665.00 N January 1, 2024 $250,000 - 500,000 6.00% 6.00% N No Increase $500,000 - $1.5 million 4.50% 4.50% N No Increase $1.5 million - $5.0 million 3.75% 3.75% N No Increase > $5 million 3.50% 3.50% N No Increase Site Plans Engineering Review Engineering Review Fee 2 Detailed Design Package Development Site Area <= 1,000 m ², fixed fee of $1,100.00 Development Site Area <= 1,000 m ², fixed fee of $1,150.00 N January 1, 2024 Development Site Area 1,001 m ² to 3000 m ² fixed fee of $3,300.00 Development Site Area 1,001 m ² to 3000 m ² fixed fee of $3,400.00 N January 1, 2024 Development Site Area > 3,001 m ² based on the sliding scale of total cost of Civil Works 5 noted below Development Site Area > 3,001 m ² based on the sliding scale of total cost of Civil Works 5 noted below N No Increase <$250,000 8% with a minimum of $5,500.00 8% with a minimum of $5,665.00 N January 1, 2024 $250,000 - $500,000 6.00% 6.00% N No Increase $500,000 - $1.5 million 4.50% 4.50% N No Increase $1.5 million - $5.0 million 3.75% 3.75% N No Increase > $5 million 3.50% 3.50% N No Increase Surcharge for submission of each Detailed Design Package after 3rd submission (payable at submission) 3 $2,700.00 $2,780.00 N January 1, 2024 Inspection Based on total cost of Civil Works 5 Inspection Fees Development Site Area <= 1,000 m², fixed fee of $1,100.00 Development Site Area <= 1,000 m², fixed fee of $1,150.00 N January 1, 2024 Development Site Area 1,001 m² to 3000 m² fixed fee of $3,300.00 Development Site Area 1,001 m² to 3000 m² fixed fee of $3,400.00 N January 1, 2024 Development Site Area > 3,001 m² based on the sliding scale of total cost of Civil Works 5 noted below Development Site Area > 3,001 m² based on the sliding scale of total cost of Civil Works 5 noted below N No Increase <$250,000 8% with a minimum of $5,500.00 8% with a minimum of $5,665.00 N January 1, 2024 $250,000 - $500,000 6.00% 6.00% N No Increase $500,000 - $1.5 million 4.50% 4.50% N No Increase $1.5 million - $5.0 million 3.75% 3.75% N No Increase > $5 million 3.50% 3.50% N No Increase Surcharge for more than two inspections required due to unaddressed deficiencies identified during earlier inspections (payable at inspection) $840.00 per inspection $865.00 per inspection N January 1, 2024 Land Division Engineering Review up to 4 proposed lots $1,650.00 $1,700.00 N January 1, 2024 >4 proposed lots if not completed as a Draft Plan of Subdivision $2,750.00 $2,835.00 N January 1, 2024 Clearance of Conditions up to 4 proposed lots $2,200.00 $2,265.00 N January 1, 2024 >4 proposed lots if not completed as a Draft Plan of Subdivision $5,500.00 $5,665.00 N January 1, 2024 Other Fees Re-circulation of Drawings due to revisions by Owner (payable at re- circulation) $2,700.00 $2,780.00 N January 1, 2024 Engineering Studies 6 (payable at submission of study) New Study 6 $7,800.00 $8,035.00 N January 1, 2024 New Study 7 $4,000.00 $4,120.00 N January 1, 2024 Update or amendment to existing study $2,600.00 per Study $2,680.00 per Study N January 1, 2024 30-64- Development Services User Fee or Charge 2023 Fee (Excluding HST) 2024 Proposed Fee (Excluding HST) HST Applicable (Y/N) 2024 Fee Effective Date Peer Reviews 8 Full recovery of City costs + 10% Admin. Fee Full recovery of City costs + 10% Admin. Fee Y No Increase Miscellaneous submissions not identified under a fee category as determined by the Director, Engineering Services or designate greater of percentage fee (based on total cost of Civil Works) 6.6% or estimated hourly rate $130/hr min of 4 hours greater of percentage fee (based on total cost of Civil Works) 6.6% or estimated hourly rate $134/hr min of 4 hours N January 1, 2024 Footnotes 1. Tree Removal Compensation to be calculated in accordance with the City of Pickering Tree Inventory, Preservation and Removal Compensation requirements, approved by Council January 15, 2018, Resolution # 387/18. 2. 75% of the Engineering Review Fee payable at 2nd Submission, with the resulting 25% payable at signature of subdivision/site plan agreement. 3. Above noted surcharges shall be discounted by 50% should less than half of the total plans/reports require revisions at the discretion of the Director, Engineering Services or designate. 4. Municipal Works are defined as all future owned Municipal Works, excluding sanitary and water distribution works. 5. Civil Works are defined as all privately owned Civil Works, excluding sanitary and water distribution works. 6. Review and approval of large scale 7. Review and approval of small to medium scale studies 8. Applicant is responsible for the City's full costs of undertaking the peer review of any study, report, drawing submitted in support of the design. This would include, but is not limited to hydrogeological, geotechnical & Slope stability, fluvial geomorphology, soils etc. 31-65- -66- -67- -68- The Regional Municipality of Durham Planning and Economic Development Department Planning Division 605 ROSSLAND RD. E. 4TH FLOOR PO BOX 623 WHITBY ON L1N 6A3 CANADA 905-668-7711 1-800-372-1102 Fax: 905-666-6208 Email: planning@durham.ca www.durham.ca Brian Bridgeman, MCIP, RPP Commissioner of Planning and Economic Development October 2, 2024 Kerry Yelk Planner II, Zoning & Administration City Development Department City of Pickering One Esplanade Pickering, ON L1V 6K7 Re: Application for Consent Durham File No. LD 107/2024 Pickering File No. LD 15-2024 Applicant: Marshall Custom Homes (100117575 Ontario Inc) Location: 1238 Bayview Municipality: City of Pickering RECOMMENDATION That application LD 107/2024 be approved, subject to the following conditions: i.That the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Region of Durham, that all the requirements listed in the attached letter from the Region of Durham Works Department, dated September 27, 2024, be satisfied. 1.PURPOSE The purpose of the application is to permit the severance of a 205.8 m2 residential parcel (Part 2) retaining 205.8 m2 residential parcel (Part 1) with the existing dwelling to be demolished. 2.PLANNING ANALYSIS Regional Official Plan (ROP) The Regional Official Plan (Envision Durham) was approved as modified by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing on September 3, 2024. 7KHVXEMHFWVLWHLVGHVLJQDWHG DVµ&RPPXQLW\$UHD¶RQ0DS RIWKH 523 Community Areas are intended to support complete communities, providing a range of housing, transportation and lifestyle choices. If this information is required in an accessible format, please contact Planning Reception at 1- 800-372-1102, extension 2548. Appendix III -69- LD 107 2024 2 The proposed consent applications will facilitate the creation of one new residential lot and a retained lot. The proposed lots are intended for the development of residential dwellings within an existing residential community. Residential infill development is permitted within this designation and supports opportunities to increase the supply of housing and utilization of land and resources. The proposed severance application appears to conform with the policies of Envision Durham by meeting housing objectives and by capitalizing on existing infrastructure. However, in accordance with Policy 11.3.10 of Envision Durham, severances cannot be granted that are contrary to the ROP and/or any area municipal official plan, as such full conformity to Envision Durham will be determined once final decision has been issued by the City of Pickering confirming that the retained and severed parcels comply with the requirements RIWKHDUHD PXQLFLSDOLW\¶V]RQLQJE\-law. Provincial Policy Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) and A Place to Grow Plan (Growth Plan) The PPS supports the optimization of land and resources by promoting opportunities for intensification and redevelopment. The subject site is located within a settlement area, which promotes infill development and where existing infrastructure, and public service facilities will be utilized. The Growth Plan requires that a minimum of 50 per cent of all residential GHYHORSPHQWRFFXUULQJDQQXDOO\LQWKH5HJLRQPXVWEHZLWKLQWKH³%XLOW-up $UHD´7KH*URZWK3ODQDOVRUHTXLUHVDOOLQWHQVLILFDWLRQDUHDVWRVXSSRUWYLEUDQW neighbourhoods by providing a diverse and compatible mix of land uses, including residential and employment uses and convenient access to local stores, services, and public service facilities. The subject lands are within an established neighbourhood in the City of Pickering. The proposal will help contribute to the achievement of more FRPSDFWFRPSOHWHFRPPXQLWLHVDQGZLOOKHOSPHHWWKH&LW\¶VDQG 5HJLRQ¶V intensification targets. The proposed severances are consistent with the PPS and conforms to the intent of the Growth Plan Provincial Plan Review Responsibilities Soil and Groundwater Assessment Protocol The applicant submitted Durham Region Site Screening Questionnaire (SSQ), signed by a Qualified Person and the Owner/Authorized Officer dated July 25, DQG DQVZHUHGµQR¶WR DOOTXHVWLRQV$VVXFKno further site assessment is required at this time. -70- LD 107 2024 3 3.AGENCY COMMENTS Regional Works Department Regional Works Department has no objections to the granting of approval of the severance applications, subject to the applicant satisfying the conditions outlined in their letter dated September 27, 2024. 4.CONCLUSION The application appears to conform with the policies of the ROP and is consistent with and conforms with provincial plans and policies. As such, the Region of Durham Planning Division recommends that the above-noted consent applications be approved subject to the conditions contained in this letter. Yours truly, Sara Hajsaleh Sara Hajsaleh Planner And Lauren Raney Lauren Raney Planning Analyst Attachements:1. Regional Works Letter CC: Grant Young- Regional Works -71- If this information is required in an accessible format, please contact 1-800-372-1102 ext. 3753. September 27, 2024 Planning and Economic Development Regional Municipality of Durham 605 Rossland Road East, 4th Floor P.O. Box 623 Whitby, ON L1N 6A3 By email – lino.trombino@durham.ca Attention: Lino Trombino Re: LD 107/2024 (LD 15-24) 1000117575 Ontario Inc. 1238 Bayview Street Lot 23, Concession Range 3 City of Pickering Dear Mr. Trombino, Please be advised that our Department has no objection to the granting of approval for the above noted severance application. The application is for the consent to sever a vacant residential parcel of land, retaining a parcel of land with an existing dwelling to be demolished. According to our waterbilling records, No. 1238 Bayview Street is connected to the regional water and sanitary supply system. A new water and sanitary service will need to be installed by regional forces for the severed lot. In order to ensure the foregoing, our department requires our following standard condition to be imposed: “That the applicant satisfies all the requirements of the Regional Municipality of Durham concerning the provision of Regional services, financial and otherwise.” In order to satisfy the Regional Works Department conditions, the applicant will be required to fulfil the following: 1. Payment for 1 sanitary service connection at $3,843.00 per connection (flat rate): = $4,035.00 2. Payment for 1 water service connection at $3,700.00 per connection (flat rate): = $3,885.00 The Regional Municipality of Durham Works Department 605 Rossland Rd. E. PO Box 623 Whitby, ON L1N 6A3 Canada 905-668-7711 1-800-372-1102 Fax: 905-668-2051 E-mail: works@durham.ca www.durham.ca -72- Lino Trombino Re: LD 107/2024 1238 Bayview Street Pickering Page 2 of 2 3. Payment for 1 existing water service Inspection fee $131.00 per connection: = $131.00 4. Payment for 1 existing sanitary service Inspection fee $131.00 per connection: = $131.00 The total amount owing at the current rate is $8,182.00. Payment shall be made by certified cheque. The above fees are subject to revision on January 1, 2025. Regional connection permits will be issued to the applicant once the above payment is remitted to our department. The severed land will be subject to regional development charges at the time of building permit issuance. In the event you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, Gran Young Development Approvals Technician grant.young@durham.ca 905 668 7711 extension 2479 -73- October 1, 2024 PER-DPP-2024-00257 XREF: CDA-2024-00002 & CFN 70383.06 BY E-MAIL ONLY (kyelk@pickering.ca) Kerry Yelk, Planner II Zoning & Administration City Development Department One The Esplanade Pickering, ON, L1V 6K7 Dear Kerry Yelk, Re: Consent Application – (LD 15/24) 1238 Bayview Street Lot 21, Plan M-90, Pickering (Liverpool Road and Bayly Street) Applicant: Samantha Webster, Marshall Custom Homes Owner: Marshall Custom Homes (1000117575 Ontario Inc.) Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff provide the following comments in response to the referenced application, received by TRCA on September 13, 2024. A list of materials reviewed by TRCA staff has been included in Appendix B. We provide the following in accordance with TRCA’s commenting role under the Planning Act and regulatory role under the Conservation Authorities Act (CA Act). Purpose of the Application TRCA staff understand that the purpose of this application is to facilitate the severance of the subject property to create one retained 205.8m2 lot (Part 1) and one severed 205.8m2 lot (Part 2). The severed lot will be retained under the same ownership and the existing residential dwelling will be replaced with two new single-family detached dwellings, one per lot. Background The subject property is 411.60m2 and zoned Urban Residential Areas – Medium Density Area under the City of Pickering Official Plan. The site is located entirely within the TRCA Regulated Area with respect to the Lake Ontario Shoreline hazard which extends onto the western portion of the site and consists of the 100-year recorded high lake level and any erosive capabilities such as wave uprush. A Concept Development Application (CDA-2024-00002/CFN 70383.06) was submitted for TRCA to review the feasibility of a severance on this lot before proceeding with any Planning Act Applications. All initial fees and submission one application requirements were submitted T: 416.661.6600 | F: 416.661.6898 | info@trca.on.ca | 101 Exchange Avenue, Vaughan, ON L4K 5R6 | www.trca.ca Appendix IV -74- Toronto and Region Conservation Authority | 2 on April 24, 2024. As part of the application, the applicant submitted a Coastal Hazard Limit Analysis, prepared by AYHDTECH Geomorphic Ltd, dated April 14, 2024, which identified the 76.24 meters above sea level (masl) as the 100-year high lake level (76.2m) plus applicable wave uprush for the site. Based on an external peer review, conducted by Baird on behalf of the TRCA, 76.5masl was identified as the cumulative shoreline hazard limit. As such, our submission one comments requested a conceptual grading plan be submitted that demonstrates a sufficient building envelope outside the shoreline hazard, while ensuring no offsite impacts, and no fragmentation of the natural hazard to facilitate the proposed severance. In response to these comments, the Applicant flagged concerns with meeting the 76.5masl site grading requirement due to the low elevations on the road access south of the site resulting in too significant of a slope for the driveway in relation to the municipal roadway; ultimately not making this solution feasible. In attempt to mitigate these concerns, TRCA recommended the following alternatives to allow for development on-site while still meeting the intent of our policies and regulations: A.Regrading the site to 76.24masl and floodproofing the proposed new dwellings to 76.54masl (flood hazard plus 0.3-meter freeboard required under TRCA policies). B.Constructing a small retaining/landscaping wall to assist with the proposed grading scheme in relation to the existing grade elevations. TRCA staff confirmed we would review a conceptual grading plan that demonstrates best efforts to accommodate one or of both these options. The submission two application requirements were received on June 27, 2024. On July 17, 2024, TRCA provided support for the proposal to proceed with a municipal severance application based on the site-specific comments outlined in this letter. TRCA Land Division Requirements Section 3.1.1 (b) of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS, 2020) requires that development be directed to areas outside of hazardous lands adjacent to river and stream systems which are impacted by flooding and erosion hazards. The PPS includes “the creation of new lots” within its definition of “development”. The requirements of the PPS are reflected in TRCA’s The Living City Policies (LCP, 2014) document which similarly direct development away from natural hazards and their associated buffers. Site-Specific Comments Section 8.5.1.1 of the LCP (2014) states that new development will not be permitted within the flood hazard of valley and stream corridors. During our review of the referenced Concept Development Application, a Draft Grading Plan, prepared by Joel Gerber Architect, was submitted and proposed to alter the site such that the new lot lines would not result in fragmentation of the flooding hazard (76.24masl). The draft grading plan also identified that the proposed replacement dwellings would be located outside the flooding hazard limit and the offsite impacts to floodplain storage as a result of the proposed grading would be negligible. TRCA understands the constraints along the driveway of Part 2. As such, we can accept the 1.90m2 that is below the 76.24masl elevation as the proposal still meets the intent of TRCA’s LCP (2014) and the PPS (2020). -75- Toronto and Region Conservation Authority | 3 Floodproofing TRCA’s LCP (Section 8.4.12, 2014) requires all new openings to be floodproofed to the flooding hazard limit plus a 0.3-meter vertical freeboard (76.54masl). This must be reflected on the final architectural drawings when they are submitted to the TRCA for review through the required CA Act permit process. Once TRCA has had the opportunity to review the finalized building elevations, we will confirm whether additional floodproofing information (e.g. stamped drawings and/or engineer’s letter) will be required. Safe Access Section 7.3.1.3 of TRCA’s LCP states that development and site alteration will not be permitted in areas that would be rendered inaccessible to people and vehicles due to hazardous lands. Based on a desktop review of the submitted Topographic Survey, prepared by J. D. Barnes Limited, TRCA staff have identified that driveway access to the site would be impacted during a 100-year flood event. The maximum flood depth for emergency vehicles to overcome in accessing this site is 0.3 meters. To receive confirmation for safe access, TRCA staff rely on our municipal partners emergency services divisions to confirm, on a site-by-site basis, if the flood elevations that are applicable to the scenario can be safely traveled through. On October 1, 2024, Pickering Fire Services confirmed they can safely access the subject site based on the information provided by the TRCA. TRCA Permit Requirement Due to the presence of natural hazards, the issuance of a TRCA permit pursuant to the CA Act is required prior to any development or property alteration taking place within the regulated portion of the site. If construction is proposed after the lots are legally severed, separate permit applications and fees for each lot will be required. A full list of initial application requirements is provided in Appendix A. TRCA Review Fee The Applicant has been advised that TRCA have implemented a fee schedule for its planning application review services in accordance with applicable provincial regulations. This application is subject to a fee of $1,590.00 (Consent/Severance/Land Division – Minor). The Applicant is responsible for fee payment within 60 days of the committee hearing date. Interest will be charged and accumulated beyond that time. We understand a cheque for this fee was provided to the City of Pickering at the time this application was submitted. Please note, the fee will remain outstanding until the hard copy cheque is received by TRCA staff. Recommendations Based on the comments provided above, TRCA staff have no objection to the approval of Consent Application LD 15/24 subject to the payment of all outstanding TRCA fees and the issuance of a TRCA permit. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned. -76- Toronto and Region Conservation Authority | 4 Regards, Megan Cranfield Planner I, Development Planning and Permits Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (437) 880-2162 Megan.cranfield@trca.ca SD/mc Attached: Appendix A: TRCA Initial Permit Application Requirements Appendix B: Materials Reviewed by TRCA BY EMAIL cc: Samantha Webster, Marshall Custom Homes: samantha@marshallhomes.ca -77- Toronto and Region Conservation Authority | 5 Appendix A: TRCA Initial Permit Application Requirements Submit the following to apply for a TRCA permit, if two permits are necessary please clearly identify which package is for each lot: 1. Application Form: Microsoft Word - TRCA-Development-Permit-Application-Form.docx (trcaca.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com) 2. Topographic Survey 3. Grading Plan o Include all plan and profile details along with cross sections. o Ensure the proposed 76.5masl shoreline hazard contour extends across the entire drawing. o Must be stamped and signed by the retained licensed professional engineer. 4. Site Plan o Include an overlay of the topographic information to scale, specifically delineating the proposed 76.5masl and 76.24masl hazard limits. o Identify the dimensions of all proposed structures and their respective setbacks from the proposed 76.24masl hazard limit. 5. Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) Plan o Showing the works fully isolated from the regulated features southwest of the site (see TRCA’s ESC Guidelines for more information). o Ensure appropriate details are included (e.g., non-woven silt fence, silt soxx, tree hoarding fencing, etc.), along with all applicable TRCA Standard Notes. o Identify all staging and stockpiling areas. 6. Floor Plans, showing: o Use of all floors; o Location of all openings (windows, doors, vents, etc.). 7. Building Elevations, showing: o Proposed grades at the base of all openings (in masl); o Proposed finished grades (in masl); o Flood hazard elevation (76.24masl); o Shoreline hazard elevation (76.5masl); o Flood hazard plus 0.3-meter freeboard elevation (76.54masl). 8. Standard Residential Permit Application Fee: $995.00 (per application) o If paying online with a credit card, a digital invoice will be sent once all other application requirements have been received. **Additional fees and/or information may be required** -78- Toronto and Region Conservation Authority | 6 Appendix B: Materials Reviewed by TRCA The following materials were reviewed by TRCA: • Draft R Plan, prepared by J. D. Barnes Limited, signed by Brett Coons, OLS, on July 22, 2024, received by TRCA on September 13, 2024; • AS102, Draft Grading Plan, prepared by Joel Gerber Architect, Revision No. 4, dated June 21, 2024, received by TRCA on June 27, 2024; • Topographic Survey, prepared by J. D. Barnes, Limited, signed by Brett Coons, OLS, on June 19, 2024, received by TRCA on June 27, 2024. -79- 76.0076.2476.3076.3876.4276.5876.4876.6975.9975.9676.0076.1776.2276.2176.2776.3876.4376.503% SLOPE DR I V E W A Y 12 3 8 B B A Y V I E W S T FF E + / - 77 . 3 2 T. O . F O U N D W A L L + / - 76 . 9 2 12 3 8 A B A Y V I E W S T FF E + / - 77 . 2 1 T. O . F O U N D W A L L + / - 76 . 8 1 UN I T P A V E R R E T A I N I N G W A L L76.076. 6 % S L O P E 4. 5 % S L O P E DR I V E W A Y UN I T P A V E R R E T A I N I N G W A L L UN I T P A V E R RE T A I N I N G W A L L UN I T P A V E R RE T A I N I N G W A L L GR A S S GR A S S GR A S S GR A S S76.1976.1576.1876 . 2 4 T / C 76 . 3 3 T / C76.1776 . 2 0 76 . 2 0 76 . 3 1 T / C75.9975.9676.0376.0576.0175.9875.9776 . 1 1 T / C 76 . 1 3 T / C 76 . 2 0 T / C 76 . 0 5 76 . 0 1 76 . 3 3 T / C 1. 5 % S W A L E 76 . 6 2 76 . 5 3 76 . 6 5 76 . 7 5 76 . 6 8 76 . 5 6 76 . 7 7 76 . 6 7 1.8% SLOPE 1.4% SLOPE 76 . 4 0 76 . 5 5 76 . 6 8 1.6% SLOPE 76 . 5 2 5% S L O P E 5% S L O P E 76 . 8 0 76 . 4 5 76 . 5 6 1. 5 % S W A L E 76 . 5 5 76 . 1 7 76 . 3 2 76 . 3 2 76 . 3 0 76 . 4 5 76 . 4 5 1. 5 % S W A L E 76 . 7 7 76 . 5 4 76 . 3 9 76 . 5 4 1. 5 % S W A L E 1. 5 % S W A L E 1. 8 % S L O P E 76 . 7 2 76 . 6 2 76 . 5 1 76 . 6 1 5% S L O P E 5% S L O P E 76.24 76 . 4 7 6. 4 % S L O P E 76 . 4 7 76 . 4 1 76 . 2 4 76 . 2 4 5. 6 % S L O P E 76 . 3 0 76 . 3 0 76 . 2 8 76 . 2 8 76 . 4 1 76 . 3 9 76 . 3 9 76.24 76 . 24 UN I T P A V E R R E T A I N I N G W A L L UN I T P A V E R R E T A I N I N G W A L L 76.24149.3714 9 . 3 6 EX I S T I N G E L E V A T I O N PR O P O S E D E L E V A T I O N SU R F A C E F L O W LE G E N D 1% EX I S T I N G 7 6 . 2 4 C O N T O U R EX I S T I N G 7 6 . 5 C O N T O U R PR O P O S E D 7 6 . 2 4 C O N T O U R PR O P O S E D 7 6 . 5 C O N T O U R 76.2476.1876 . 3 3 T / C76.1776 . 2 076.1576 . 2 0 76 . 3 1 T / C 1. 9 0 m 2 CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 1 . A L L I N F O R M A T I O N C O N T A I N E D O N T H I S D R A W I N G I N C L U D I N G , B U T N O T L I M I T E D TO , D E S I G N C O N C E P T S A N D D E T A I L S I S T H E P R O P E R T Y O F J O E L G E R B E R A R C H I T E C T . A L L I D E A S DO C U M E N T E D H E R E I N W E R E C R E A T E D A N D D E V E L O P E D F O R T H I S S P E C I F I C P R O J E C T A N D S H A L L N O T B E RE U S E D I N A N Y F O R M W I T H O U T W R I T T E N P E R M I S S I O N O F J O E L G E R B E R A R C H I T E C T . JO E L G E R B E R AR C H I T E C T ALL D R A W I N G S A N D I N F O R M A T I O N O N T H E S E D R A W I N G S M U S T B E C H E C K E D A N D V E R I F I E D O N S I T E PR I O R T O C O N S T R U C T I O N A N D F A B R I C A T I O N . S H O U L D E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S O R S E R V I C E S B E F O U N D T O VA R Y F R O M T H A T I N D I C A T E D O N A R C H I T E C T U R A L D R A W I N G S , T H E A R C H I T E C T / O R T H E E N G I N E E R M U S T BE N O T I F I E D . UN L E S S S P E C I F I C A L L Y N O T E D O T H E R W I S E O N T H E D R A W I N G S N O P R O V I S I O N H A S B E E N M A D E I N T H E DE S I G N F O R E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S A N D C O N D I T I O N S O C C U R R I N G D U R I N G C O N S T R U C T I O N . I T S H A L L B E T H E RE S P O N S I B I L I T Y O F T H E C O N T R A C T O R T O P R O V I D E A L L N E C E S S A R Y B R A C I N G , S H O R I N G , S H E E T P I L I N G OR O T H E R T E M P O R A R Y S U P P O R T S , T O S A F E G U A R D A L L E X I S T I N G O R A D J A C E N T S T R U C T U R E S A F F E C T E D B Y TH I S W O R K . ALL D I M E N S I O N S A R E G I V E N I N I M P E R I A L U N I T S U N L E S S O T H E R W I S E I N D I C A T E D . GE N E R A L N O T E S 23 D O N C A S T E R A V E N U E TO R O N T O , O N M 4 C 1 Y 4 C A N A D A 1. 6 4 7 . 2 6 2 . 0 5 5 5 IN F O @ J O E L G E R B E R A R C H I T E C T . C O M SC A L E : PR O J E C T N o : N As i n d i c a t e d MA Y 2 0 2 4 AS 1 0 2 DR A F T G R A D I N G PL A N RE S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T 12 3 8 B A Y V I E W S T . 08 0 4 7 NO T E : PR O P E R T Y I N F O R M A T I O N B A S E D O N T O P O G R A P H I C S U R V E Y B Y JD B A R N E S L T D D A T E D A P R I L 1 7 , 2 0 2 4 No . DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E YY Y Y / M M / D D 1 I S S U E D F O R T R C A R E V I E W 20 2 4 / 0 5 / 0 6 2 I S S U E D F O R T R C A R E V I E W 20 2 4 / 0 5 / 1 6 3 I S S U E D F O R T R C A R E V I E W 20 2 4 / 0 6 / 1 0 4 I S S U E D F O R T R C A R E V I E W 20 2 4 / 0 6 / 2 1 1 : 1 0 0 DR A F T G R A D I N G P L A N 1 1 : 5 0 DE T A I L 2 -80- -81-