HomeMy WebLinkAboutSeptember 13, 2021
Planning & Development
Committee Meeting Minutes
September 13, 2021
Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Butt
Present:
Mayor David Ryan
Councillors:
K. Ashe
M. Brenner
S. Butt
I. Cumming
B. McLean
D. Pickles
Also Present:
M. Carpino - Chief Administrative Officer
K. Bentley - Director, City Development & CBO
P. Bigioni - Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor
F. Jadoon - Director, Economic Development & Strategic Projects
S. Cassel - City Clerk
C. Rose - Chief Planner
N. Surti - Manager, Development Review & Urban Design
D. Jacobs - Manager, Policy & Geomatics
M. Kish - Principal Planner, Policy
C. Morrison - Principal Planner, Development Review
C. Blumenberg - Deputy Clerk
F. Chau - Planner ll
I. Lima - Acting, Planner ll
1.Roll Call
The City Clerk certified that all Members of Council were present and participating
electronically in accordance with By-law 7771/20.
2.Disclosure of Interest
No disclosures of interest were noted.
Moved by Councillor Ashe
Seconded by Councillor McLean
That the rules of procedure be suspended to allow one additional delegation, with a
presentation, under Section 3 of the agenda regarding Information Report No. 13-21, and
one additional delegation, under Section 4 of the agenda regarding Report PLN 33-21.
1
Planning & Development
Committee Meeting Minutes
September 13, 2021
Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Butt
Carried on a Two-Thirds Vote
3.Statutory Public Meetings
Councillor Butt, Chair, gave an outline of the requirements for a Statutory Public Meeting
under the Planning Act. He outlined the notification process procedures and also noted
that if a person or public body does not make oral or written submissions to the City
before the By-law is passed, that person or public body are not entitled to appeal the
decision of City Council to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT), and may not be
entitled to be added as a party to the hearing unless, in the opinion of LPAT, there are
reasonable grounds to do so.
Catherine Rose, Chief Planner, appeared before the Committee to act as facilitator for
the Statutory Public Meeting portion of the meeting, explaining the process for discussion
purposes as well as the order of speakers.
3.1 Information Report No. 12-21
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 06/21
Unique AT Holding Corporation
1470 Bayly Street
A statutory public meeting was held under the Planning Act, for the purpose of
informing the public with respect to the above-noted application.
Isabel Lima, Acting, Planner II, provided the Committee with an overview and
outlined the preliminary information of the application for a Zoning By-law
Amendment, submitted by Unique AT Holding Corporation, to facilitate the
construction of a high-density, mixed-use development consisting of two
residential towers. Through the aid of a PowerPoint presentation, Ms. Lima
discussed the location of the subject lands, the Universal City Master Plan phases
and proposal specifics including the height of the proposed towers and the 164
residential units with commercial and retail uses. Ms. Lima highlighted the site
plan, public piazza plan, mixed use area “City Centre” designation, and proposed
amendments, including an increase in the maximum permitted building height,
setbacks and reduction in parking ratio. Ms. Lima summarized the City staff,
public, and agency comments received, and next steps in the application.
Michael Vani, Senior Planner, Weston Consulting, joined the electronic meeting
via audio connection and concurred with staff’s overview of the application. He
noted excitement for the application, and using a conceptual rendering, he
outlined the design and uniqueness of the proposed towers. Mr. Vani spoke to the
elements of the application, such as the public space options, public art
2
Planning & Development
Committee Meeting Minutes
September 13, 2021
Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Butt
components, commercial elements, and aim to create a vibrant pedestrian
experience. He noted he was available for questions from the Committee.
Brief discussion ensued regarding assurance from the applicant that all noted
issues would be addressed to the mutual satisfaction of all parties.
3.2 Information Report No. 13-21
Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 21-001/P
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 05/21
(Regional Official Plan Amendment Application ROPA 021-002)
Sunrise International Investments Inc.
3695 Sideline 4
A statutory public meeting was held under the Planning Act, for the purpose of
informing the public with respect to the above-noted application.
Felix Chau, Planner ll provided the Committee with an overview of Official Plan
Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment, submitted by Sunrise International
Investments Inc., to facilitate the redevelopment of an existing golf club. Through
the aid of a PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Chau outlined the purpose of the
application, and provided an overview of the subject lands, and the proposal for a
new year-round golf course facility that would include an outdoor 9-hole golf
course with putting green, golf cart routes, and a 6,087 square metre indoor golf
dome with a driving range, virtual golf simulators and amenity spaces. Mr. Chau
advised that to support the proposed mixture of uses, the applicant is proposing
235 surface parking spaces, conceptual elevation, , and studies necessary as per
the requirements of the application, including a hydrogeological study. He further
outlined the storm water management features and summarized the City staff,
public, and agency comments received and next steps in the application.
Adrian Litavski, Principal, Johnston Livatski Inc., joined the electronic meeting via
audio connection and concurred with staff’s overview of the application. Through
the aid of a PowerPoint presentation, he highlighted the design of the new club
house, including the expanded restaurant services and parking. He noted the
amendments would renew and improve the existing golf facility to expand services
and spoke to the re-designation from prime agriculture to major open space at the
Regional level.. Mr. Litavski noted he was available for questions from the
Committee.
A brief question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee
and Adrian Litavski, Principal, Johnston Livatski Inc. regarding:
3
Planning & Development
Committee Meeting Minutes
September 13, 2021
Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Butt
how the subject land has not been used for agricultural purposes for a long
time;
exploring an alternative route to use a private driveway for fire and
emergency services access; and,
the existing uses of the current club house facility, and how the renovation
of the facility would permit enhanced use of the facility.
4.Delegations
4.1 Anthony Caruso, Senior Planner
Gregory Pereira, Manager, Transportation Planning
Danielle Culp, Planning Analyst, Transportation Planning
Regional Municipality of Durham
Re: Draft Regional Cycling Plan 2021
Anthony Caruso, Senior Planner, Gregory Pereira, Manager, Transportation
Planning, and Danielle Culp, Planning Analyst, Transportation, Regional
Municipality of Durham, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection to
provide an overview of the Draft Regional Cycling Plan (RCP) 2021. Through the
aid of the PowerPoint presentation, they outlined the RCP timeline, 217 km of new
cycling routes, and vision to support the planning, design, implementation and
promotion of a connected, safe, and accessible Regional wide primary cycling
network. Mr. Caruso spoke of the 20 year timeline, the proposed cycling facility
types for the City, and financing options and considerations. Ms. Culp advised that
the success of the RCP relies on an adequate provision of human resources,
provided both through strategic partnerships with the City, and Regional and
Municipal staff and highlighted next steps in the process.
A brief question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee
and Anthony Caruso, Gregory Pereira, and Danielle Culp regarding:
whether cross-rides are included in the RPC, regulated, and marked as
“cross-rides”. Ms. Culp noted that cross-rides are proposed to facilitate safe
bicycle crossing, and what is required for identification is a mix of pavement
markings and signage that will be confirmed at the detail design stage. She
further added that the current plan identifies proposed locations in
collaboration with other Regional Plans, such as the ‘Vision Zero’ study;
the number of cross-ride locations proposed in the City of Pickering and
Regional and City staff working together to identify potential locations; and,
parking areas for bicycles, and whether there are coordinated systems for
bicycle rentals as part of the RCP.
4
Planning & Development
Committee Meeting Minutes
September 13, 2021
Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Butt
4.2 TJ Cieciura
President, Design Plan Services Inc.
Re: Report PLN 35-21
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/19
Amberlea Creek Development Inc.
760 and 770 Kingston Road
TJ Cieciura, President, Design Plan Services Inc., joined the electronic meeting
via audio connection to speak in support of Report PLN 35-21. He thanked
members of the Committee and the public for their support, and noted he was
available for questions from the Committee.
A brief question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee
and TJ Cieciura regarding:
the waste system, impacts to adjacent property owners, and what
measures would be taken to mitigate issues. Mr. Cieciura replied that the
proposal includes a molok underground waste management system,
located far south, away from the existing residences to the north of the
subject lands;
the benefits of the underground waste management molok system; and,
incorporating molok waste management system solutions in future
applications to reduce waste management impacts to abutting property
owners.
4.3 Paul White, President
Fairport Beach Neighbourhood Association (Inc.1949)
Re: Report PLN 33-21
City Initiated: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment
Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods
Recommended Amendment 40 to the Pickering Official Plan
Recommended Informational Revision 28 to the Pickering Official Plan
Recommended Draft Zoning By-law Amendments
Revised Urban Design Guidelines
Files: OPA 20-006/P and A 11/20
Paul White, President, Fairport Beach Neighbourhood Association, joined the
electronic meeting via audio connection and spoke to Report PLN 33-21. He
stated that the Fairport Beach area had been impacted by the construction of an
increasing number of houses, either as the result of a demolition and rebuild, or
larger lots being severed and new homes built, that are significantly larger than
existing adjacent houses. Mr. White spoke to the need of the updates to the
Official Plan, and Zoning By-law as a starting point to impose necessary
5
Planning & Development
Committee Meeting Minutes
September 13, 2021
Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Butt
requirements for builders. He referenced the points of the study, such as the
dwelling height, roof pitch, dwelling length, separation distance between dwellings
and front yard landscaping, and noted that the process included meaningful
community involvement. Mr. White stated that the recommendations in the study
with regards to driveway width, yard landscaping, and trees were not as robust,
and spoke to the importance of tree preservation, and strengthening the City’s tree
preservation By-law.
4.4 Elizabeth Italiano
Re: Report PLN 33-21
City Initiated: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment
Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods
Recommended Amendment 40 to the Pickering Official Plan
Recommended Informational Revision 28 to the Pickering Official Plan
Recommended Draft Zoning By-law Amendments
Revised Urban Design Guidelines
Files: OPA 20-006/P and A 11/20
Elizabeth Italiano, 645 Annland Street, joined the electronic meeting via audio
connection and spoke in opposition to Report PLN 33-21. She expressed concern
for the restrictive nature of the bylaws, and timing of the study being conducted
pre-COVID-19. She stated the Pandemic has changed the way people work and
live, and asked that a new study be conducted that takes into consideration the
new realities. Ms. Italiano spoke to her personal experience of presenting at the
Committee of Adjustment with regards to her property to build to a height of 10
meters, and that different standards had been applied for different people as other
similar applications had been approved. She referenced specific examples of
inequities in the proposed by-laws, such as Section (f)(ii) of the Draft Official Plan
Amendment and Section 5(f) of the Draft By-Law Amendment regarding the
minimum front yard setbacks. She further stated that a significant amount of
development had already taken place in certain neighbourhoods, prior to the
guidelines and that as such, the Study would continue to create inequities
between property owners. Ms. Italiano stated that the lot coverage calculations
and benchmarking in the Study was flawed, as it calculates lot coverage for
applications for both new developments and infill lots using older data and urged
the Committee to oppose the recommendations in Report PLN 33-21.
A brief question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee
and Elizabeth Italiano regarding:
what a sufficient height restriction would entail, with Ms. Italiano responding
that a height restriction of 10.5 metres should be the standard;
6
Planning & Development
Committee Meeting Minutes
September 13, 2021
Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Butt
how the side yard setbacks and separation distances result in similar
limitations that were there with the lot coverage, and how it translates into
the real world; and,
clarification on the petition from January 2021, its subject matter, and the
number of individuals who had signed the petition.
4.5 Elena Walmsley
Re: Report PLN 33-21
City Initiated: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment
Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods
Recommended Amendment 40 to the Pickering Official Plan
Recommended Informational Revision 28 to the Pickering Official Plan
Recommended Draft Zoning By-law Amendments
Revised Urban Design Guidelines
Files: OPA 20-006/P and A 11/20
Elena Walmsley, 784 Oliva Street, joined the electronic meeting via audio
connection and spoke to Report PLN 33-21. She stated that if the City Initiated
Official Plan and Zoning By-Law Amendments: Infill and Replacement Housing in
Established Neighborhoods Study, was currently in place, she would not have to
be attending an Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing with regards to a Committee of
Adjustment matter. Ms. Walmsley noted the Study is too restrictive, and urged the
Committee to extend the boundary of the Study to include all of the boundary of
the West Shore area south of the 401and west of Frenchman’s Bay.
4.6 Lori Matorcevic
Re: Report PLN 33-21
City Initiated: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment
Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods
Recommended Amendment 40 to the Pickering Official Plan
Recommended Informational Revision 28 to the Pickering Official Plan
Recommended Draft Zoning By-law Amendments
Revised Urban Design Guidelines
Files: OPA 20-006/P and A 11/20
Lori Matorcevic, 782 Oliva Street, joined the electronic meeting via audio
connection and spoke to Report PLN 33-21. She stated that the Infill and
Replacement Housing in Established Neighborhoods Study has been a growing
document since 2016, and that the document cannot evolve as quickly as the infill
and replacement housing in established neighbourhoods is occurring. She spoke
to her experience in opposing a Committee of Adjustment decision that was
favourable to the builder, and noted she is not in opposition to development and
7
Planning & Development
Committee Meeting Minutes
September 13, 2021
Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Butt
modernization, however development should occur adhering to the existing
setback and height requirements. Ms. Matorcevic asked that the Committee
include the West Shore established neighbourhoods as part of the Study.
4.7 Adam Layton
Evans Planning Inc.
Re: Report PLN 33-21
City Initiated: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment
Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods
Recommended Amendment 40 to the Pickering Official Plan
Recommended Informational Revision 28 to the Pickering Official Plan
Recommended Draft Zoning By-law Amendments
Revised Urban Design Guidelines
Files: OPA 20-006/P and A 11/20
Adam Layton, Partner, Evans Planning Inc., joined the electronic meeting via
audio connection and spoke to Report PLN 33-21. He stated that submissions on
the topic have been made several times on behalf of his client, Centreville Homes
(Pickering) Inc., the owner of lands municipally described as 313 Toynevale Road,
a current active application. He noted further refinements are required in the
Study, such as the definition of ‘Infill Dwelling(s)’ and ‘Replacement Dwelling, and
clarity on whether it impacts current active planning applications. He further added
that the proposed amendments to the City of Pickering Official Plan envisioned
within OPA 40, particularly those within Policy 3.9(f) are overly restrictive, and may
have negative impacts with regard to potential infill such as that contemplated by
the owner, and lack clear language within the definitions of ‘Infill’ and
‘Replacement Dwellings’. Mr. Layton asked the Committee to defer the decision
on the matter and noted availability to answer questions.
A brief discussion ensued regarding clarification on the enclave of the active
application on the subject lands, and building a project that blended in with the
character of the area. Mr. Layton noted that adhering to the existing
characteristics of a neighbourhood is important, however it has to be balanced
against the broader provincial policy statement of intensification and diversification
of housing opportunities.
4.8 David Steele
Re: Report PLN 33-21
City Initiated: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment
Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods
Recommended Amendment 40 to the Pickering Official Plan
Recommended Informational Revision 28 to the Pickering Official Plan
Recommended Draft Zoning By-law Amendments
8
Planning & Development
Committee Meeting Minutes
September 13, 2021
Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Butt
Revised Urban Design Guidelines
Files: OPA 20-006/P and A 11/20
David Steele, Pickering West Shore Community Association, joined the electronic
meeting via audio connection to delegate on Report PLN 33-21. He spoke to his
experience of being a resident of the City for over 20 years, and prior professional
experience in construction. He stated that the inclusion of Fairport only, and not
the West Shore community as part of the boundaries of the Study is insufficient.
He noted many of his neighbours and friends are talking about the exclusion of
such and asked that all of West Shore and Bay Ridges communities be added to
the Study area, and to keep established neighbourhood characteristics.
4.9 Dana Saccoccio
Re: Report PLN 33-21
City Initiated: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment
Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods
Recommended Amendment 40 to the Pickering Official Plan
Recommended Informational Revision 28 to the Pickering Official Plan
Recommended Draft Zoning By-law Amendments
Revised Urban Design Guidelines
Files: OPA 20-006/P and A 11/20
Dana Saccoccio, 417 Woodgrange Avenue, joined the electronic meeting via
audio connection and spoke in opposition to Report PLN 33-21. She noted the
Study is inequitable and discriminatory as it impacts the character of
neighbourhoods, and explained there is a difference between complying with By-
laws and applying for variances. Ms. Saccoccio stated that the Study describes an
approval process that is subjective, with no way for an individual development
applicant to measure requirements for certain, but allows subjective decision
making on the part of City staff during the application process. She inquired how
“complement” and “compatible” could be measured or decided upon and who
would be deciding. Ms. Saccoccio further added that this important matter
affecting so many Pickering property owners should not be decided on until an in-
person Committee meeting can be conducted where more residents and
ratepayers can attend in person and interact, and that the proposed criteria of
dwelling depth, front yard setback, and side yard setback are not adequate. She
asked that the Committee ensure the criteria for building permit applications is
consistent and objective, no matter what the adjacent property’s existing
conditions are.
Moved by Councillor Pickles
Seconded by Councillor Cumming
9
That Louisville Homes Limited be released from the provisions of the
Subdivision Agreement and any amendments thereto relating to Plan 40M-
2399; and,
Planning & Development
Committee Meeting Minutes
September 13, 2021
Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Butt
That the Committee take a short recess.
Carried
The Committee recessed at 9:15 pm and reconvened at 9:25 pm.
Upon reconvening, the City Clerk conducted a roll call and certified that all
Members of the Committee were once again present, and participating
electronically in accordance with By-law 7771/20.
5.Planning & Development Reports
5.1 Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor, Report LEG 13-21
Louisville Homes Limited – Plan of Subdivision 40M-2399
-Final Assumption of Plan of Subdivision
-Lots 1 to 23 and Blocks 24 to 34, Plan 40M-2399
-File: 40M-2399
Recommendation:
Moved by Councillor Ashe
Seconded by Councillor Cumming
1.That works and services required by the Subdivision Agreement within
Plan 40M-2399, which are constructed, installed or located on lands
dedicated to, or owned by the City, or on lands lying immediately adjacent
thereto, including lands that are subject to easements transferred to the
City, be accepted and assumed for maintenance;
2.
3.That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the
actions necessary to implement the recommendations in this report.
Carried
5.2 Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor, Report LEG 14-21
2047729 Ontario Inc. – Plan of Subdivision 40M-2328
-Final Assumption of Plan of Subdivision
-Municipal works on Altona Road adjacent to Block 1, Plan 40M-2328
-File: 40M-2328
10
Planning & Development
Committee Meeting Minutes
September 13, 2021
Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Butt
Recommendation:
Moved by Councillor Ashe
Seconded by Councillor Cumming
1.That works and services required by the Subdivision Agreement within
Altona Road, adjacent to or outside Plan 40M-2328, which are
constructed, installed or located on lands dedicated to, or owned by the
City, or on lands lying immediately adjacent thereto, including lands that
are subject to easements transferred to the City, be accepted and
assumed for maintenance;
2.That 2047729 Ontario Inc. be released from the provisions of the
Subdivision Agreement and any amendments thereto relating to the works
on Altona Road outside of Plan 40M-2328; and,
3.That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the
actions necessary to implement the recommendations in this report.
Carried
5.3 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 33-21
City Initiated: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment
Infill and Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhoods
Recommended Amendment 40 to the Pickering Official Plan
Recommended Informational Revision 28 to the Pickering Official Plan
Recommended Draft Zoning By-law Amendments
Revised Urban Design Guidelines
Files: OPA 20-006/P and A 11/20
A question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee and
City Staff regarding:
concerns regarding the rules, applicability, equity and if this is the right time
for the Study, and if there should be a phasing in period;
how the Report and By-laws protect community character, however at the
same time, take away the rights of private property owners to develop their
properties;
how there were no standards before, which has resulted in small cottages
with monster homes built beside them, and that if the Study is stalled, this
issue would continue and would not be remediated on its own;
11
Planning & Development
Committee Meeting Minutes
September 13, 2021
Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Butt
how extensive public consultation and public meetings took place to arrive
at the recommendations in the Study, and subsequent amendments to the
Official Plan and Zoning By-law; and,
how the Study needs to be a living document, with a built-in process of
when and how it will be reviewed by Council;
how the Committee has dealt with many important planning applications
and City business during COVID-19, albeit in a virtual manner;
how the proposed boundaries of the Study need to be examined, and that
the City is undergoing a transformation and rapid changes, and how
community character has many definitions;
the lack of clarity that staff are applying, and the need to look at
neighbourhhood precincts and use plain language that helps people
understand what the Study entails;
how the checklist is critical, and many communities have utilized it as a
measure and criteria of how to define community character and established
neighbourhoods;
ensuring any memorandum from staff, for clarification on the Study, is
made public, including the clarification on tree preservation, protecting
vegetation on private property and how the Study can be proactive before
communities reach a point of no return;
how the City can build transitions in community character, and learn from
best practices and land tribunal decisions;
confirmation that the Study was circulated and promoted, with Kyle Bentley,
Director, City Development & CBO advising that since 2017, focus groups,
electronic open house meetings, an interested parties list, and dedicated
website page were utilized to engage the public on the Study;
confirmation that all subject lands impacted by the proposed By-laws
received a Notice of the Study, as with any other planning application, as
well as an advertisement in the local newspaper for two weeks;
how current active planning applications may be impacted, and that there is
wording about phasing in and when the amendments take effect;
how staff have tried to strike a balance between opposing viewpoints;
the cost of the study, with Catherine Rose, Chief Planner advising that the
Study cost $148,000, with 55% covered by tax payers, and the rest of the
funds coming from Development Charges; and,
the rationale for the 9 metre maximum dwelling height, with Mr. Bentley
advising that there was a public engagement effort, including municipal
best practices through stakeholder comments and a public engagement
meeting where Council endorsed the 9 metre height.
Recommendation:
12
Planning & Development
Committee Meeting Minutes
September 13, 2021
Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Butt
Moved by Councillor Cumming
Seconded by Councillor Ashe
1.a) That Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 20-006/P, initiated by
the City of Pickering, to add new policies to the Pickering Official Plan
with regard to Infill and Replacement Housing in Established
Neighbourhood Precinct areas, as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN
33-21, be approved;
b)That the Draft By-law to adopt Official Plan Amendment 40 to the
Pickering Official Plan, to add new policies to the Pickering Official
Plan with regard to Infill and Replacement Housing in Established
Neighbourhood Precinct areas, as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN
33-21, be finalized and forwarded to Council for enactment;
2.That Council adopt Informational Revision 28 to the Pickering Official Plan,
to add a layer identifying the boundaries of Established Neighbourhood
Precincts to the informational neighbourhood maps contained within
Chapter 12 – Urban Neighbourhoods, of the Pickering Official Plan, as set
out in Appendix Il to Report PLN 33-21;
3.That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/20, initiated by the City of
Pickering, to implement Official Plan Amendment 40, be approved, and that
the Recommended Draft Zoning By-law Amendments as set out in
Appendices lll, lV, and V to Report PLN 33-21 be finalized and forwarded to
Council for enactment; and,
4.That Council adopt the Revised Urban Design Guidelines for Infill &
Replacement Housing in Established Neighbourhood Precincts, August
2021, as set out in Appendix Vl to Report PLN 33-21, which replaces the
Urban Design Guidelines for Infill & Replacement Housing in Established
Neighbourhood Precincts dated August 2020, adopted by Council on
September 28, 2020 through Resolution #428/20.
Carried Later in the Meeting (See Following Motion):
Moved by Councillor McLean
Seconded by Councillor Ashe
That Report PLN 33-21, be referred back to staff to report back at the October 25,
2021 Council Meeting, to address the questions and comments raised during the
Meeting.
Motion Lost
13
Planning & Development
Committee Meeting Minutes
September 13, 2021
Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Butt
The Main Motion, was then Carried on a Recorded Vote as Follows:
Yes No
Councillor Butt Councillor Ashe
Councillor Brenner
Councillor Cumming
Councillor McLean
Councillor Pickles
Mayor Ryan
5.4 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 34-21
The Municipal Comprehensive Review of the Durham Regional Official Plan:
Proposed Regional Official Plan Amendment 2021-003
Policies and Delineations for Protected Major Transit Station Areas
-File: A-2100-020
Brief discussion ensued regarding the comprehensive review of the Official Plan
as it relates to major transit areas, and the rationale as to why the Report did not
include mention of the Havelock high-speed line. Clarification was provided that
this exercise was dealing with existing or planned centres, not those that had been
requested which was outside the parameters of what was being discussed in
Report PLN 34-21.
Recommendation:
Moved by Councillor Pickles
Seconded by Councillor Brenner
1.That Council support in principle the Proposed Regional Official Plan
Amendment: Policies and Delineations for Protected Major Transit Station
Areas (ROPA 2021-003); and,
2.That the appropriate officials of the City of Pickering be authorized to take
the necessary actions as indicated in this report.
Carried
5.5 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 35-21
Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/19
Amberlea Creek Development Inc.
760 and 770 Kingston Road
14
Planning & Development
Committee Meeting Minutes
September 13, 2021
Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm
Chair: Councillor Butt
Recommendation:
Moved by Councillor Brenner
Seconded by Mayor Ryan
That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/19, submitted by Amberlea
Creek Developments Inc., to facilitate a residential condominium development
consisting of 88 stacked townhouse units, be approved subject to the zoning
provisions contained in Appendix I to Report PLN 35-21, and that staff be
authorized to finalize and forward an implementing Zoning By-law Amendment to
Council for enactment.
Carried
6.Other Business
Carried
6.1 Councillor Brenner inquired about the Intensification Study on Kingston Road, and
the process moving forward regarding resident concerns on height and size.. Kyle
Bentley, Director, City Development & CBO advised that staff are aware of the
concerns expressed by the community with regards to some of the applications
and examining what would be optimal. He added that staff are intending to bring a
report forward with regards to intensification policies in the fall of 2021, and that
developers have been advised that Council has endorsed the guidelines in
principle. Dean Jacobs, Manager, Policy & Geomatics, added that the concerns
expressed by residents on building height are known, and that staff have been
transparent with potential developers of such community concerns.
6.2 Councillor Pickles enquired about Glen Cedars Golf Course, and their intent to
extend their lease with the Federal Government, and requested that staff follow-up
with the applicable Federal department to inquire whether any consideration was
being made in this regard.
7.Adjournment
Moved by Councillor Ashe
Seconded by Councillor Cumming
That the meeting be adjourned.
Carried
The meeting adjourned at 10:47 pm.
15