Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMay 3, 2021 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes May 3, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Cumming Present: Mayor David Ryan Councillors: K. Ashe M. Brenner S. Butt I. Cumming B. McLean D. Pickles Also Present: M. Carpino - Chief Administrative Officer K. Bentley - Director, City Development & CBO P. Bigioni - Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor S. Cassel - City Clerk C. Rose - Chief Planner N. Surti - Manager, Development Review & Urban Design C. Morrison - Principal Planner, Development Review C. Blumenberg - Deputy Clerk E. Martelluzzi - Planner ll - Heritage I. Lima - Planner I 1. Roll Call The City Clerk certified that all Members of Council were present and participating electronically in accordance with By-law 7771/20. 2. Disclosure of Interest No disclosures of interest were noted. 3. Statutory Public Meetings Councillor Cumming, Chair, gave an outline of the requirements for a Statutory Public Meeting under the Planning Act. He outlined the notification process procedures and alsonoted that if a person or public body does not make oral or written submissions to the City before the By-law is passed, that person or public body are not entitled to appeal thedecision of City Council to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT), and may not be 1 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes May 3, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Cumming entitled to be added as a party to the hearing unless, in the opinion of LPAT, there are reasonable grounds to do so. Catherine Ross, Chief Planner, appeared before the Committee to act as facilitator for the Statutory Public Meeting portion of the meeting, explaining t he process for discussion purposes as well as the order of speakers. Moved by Councillor Pickles Seconded by Councillor Butt That the rules of procedure be suspended to allow one additional delegation under Section 3 of the agenda regarding Information Report No. 09-21. Carried on a Two-Thirds Vote 3.1 Information Report No. 09-21 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 01/21 596857 Ontario Inc. 1279 and 1281 Commerce Street A statutory public meeting was held under the Planning Act, for the purpose of informing the public with respect to the above-noted application. Isabel Lima, Planner I, provided the Committee with an overview of Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 01/21, submitted by 596857 Ontario Inc. Through the aid of a PowerPoint presentation, Ms. Lima outlined the purpose of the application, to facilitate an infill residential development, and overview of the subject lands. Ms. Lima highlighted the submitted site plan, submitted rendering, amenities such as the rooftop walkout area, and submitted west elevation. She advised that the subject lands are located within the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood, and are designated “Urban Residential Areas – Low Density Area”, which provides for residential or related uses at a maximum net residential density of up to and including 30 uni ts per net hectare. Ms. Lima stated that the proposal will be assessed against the policies and provisions of the Official Plan, and the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood Policies. She highlighted the comments received for further review, and next steps on the proposed application. Robert A. Martindale, Martindale Planning Services and Aphrodite Liaghat, Principal, A & Architects, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection to present an overview of the application on behalf of the applicant. Through the aid of a PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Martindale highlighted the application to develop the lands through land severance, the flat roof design of the proposed dwellings, and the proximity of the subject lands to amenities, such as 2 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes May 3, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Cumming Frenchman’s Bay. Mr. Martindale demonstrated the context plan, a survey of the subject lands, and existing buildings on the property. Mr. Martindale noted the technical statistics for the project, the roof plan, floor plan for each level of the dwellings, and how the proposal will blend in with the Bay Ridges Neighbourhood characteristics. Maureen Metcalfe, 667 Front Road, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection and suggested that three dwellings could face Front Road and one dwelling could face Commerce Street. She expressed opposition to the proposed application, due t o the density of four dwellings fronting onto Front Road, and stated the flat roof top design could set a precedent for the area noting concerns regarding privacy, as the rooftop will overlook her yard. Syed Huq, Pickering resident, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection and spoke in favour of the application. He noted that the City is undergoing a transformation of a semi urban area to a fully grown modern city, incorporating all modes of transportations, malls, and recreation centers such as Durham Live, Pickering City Center, and the Airport. He stated that Pickering should prepare itself for population growth, and available land should be developed effectively, to become more viable and sustainable with improvements to business and commercial activities. Mr. Huq further stated that City amenities and facilities are underutilized, and t he proposed application of a three storied building would attract bigger families, resulting i n growth, which would make the existing commercial and transportation facilities of the City more viable, and expedite the appeal of the City. A question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee and Robert A. Martindale, Martindale Planning Services and Aphrodite Liaghat, A & Architects regarding: • the rationale for a flat roof design. Ms. Liaghat advised that the contemporary flat roof design provides an advantage for better views, respects the environment with a green roof option, rain storagemanagement, and lower maintenance; • the option of 3 homes facing F ront Road and whether building a bigger house on a larger lot was an option. Ms. Liaghat noted that bigger dwellings would not permit the subject lands to be utilized efficiently, and that theproposed dwellings are an average good size for a family; • how the green roof would take up half the rooftop; • whether the roof would have a pedestrian landing, and elevator with Ms. Liaghat confirming that there were no plans for an elevator; • confirmation that there were no livable basements in the dwellings, andverification of the garage sizes; 3 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes May 3, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Cumming • explanation on why a severance option was being sought, instead of planof subdivision. Mr. Martindale advised that normally only three lots aresevered at a time, however Council may permit more than three lots by way of severance when there is servicing (water/sewer) in place; and, • how this proposal is within the maximum density permitted. 4. Delegations 4.1 Nenad Majumder Re: Report PLN 24-21 Official Plan Amendment OPA 18-005/P Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/18 Highmark (Pickering) Inc. 1640 Kingston Road, 1964 and 1970 Guild Road Nenad Majumder, 1966 Guild Road, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection, and expressed opposition to the application. He noted that it contradicts the City’s Official Plan and Bay Ridges Neighbourhood Policies. Mr. Majumder stated the application lacked key information, such as a traffic study in some key intersections, lack of parking spaces, and insufficient amenity, and open/recreational space. He further added that the application will cause traffic congestion, road safety issues, and drainage concerns. Mr. Majumder noted that the building design does not conform to the characteristics of the existing neighbourhood of detached houses and large lots, with no gradual transformation. He advised that the application would encroach on his privacy, and cause run-off drainage issues onto his adjacent property. 4.2 Reverend Fran Kovar, Interim Priest-in-Charge Pam Johnstone, Rector's Warden Bruce Hampson, People's Warden St. Paul's on-the-Hill Re: Report PLN 26-21 Additions to Municipal Heritage Register 401 Kingston Road, 1 Evelyn Avenue and 882-886 Kingston Road Rev. Fran Kovar, Interim-Priest in Charge, Pam Johnstone, and Bruce Hampson, St. Paul’s on-the-Hill, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection, and noted that the addition of 886 Kingston Road to the Municipal Heritage Register, and potential designation, may increase their costs, specifically if restoration is needed on the tower made of reclaimed bricks. They noted it is an honour to be considered for a designation, and sought clarification on the heritage designation process. Ms. Johnstone enquired about grants or monies available to help with restoration costs. 4 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes May 3, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Cumming 4.3 Alan Jeffs Re: Report PLN 24-21 Official Plan Amendment OPA 18-005/P Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/18 Highmark (Pickering) Inc. 1640 Kingston Road, 1964 and 1970 Guild Road Alan Jeffs, 1995 Royal Road, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection, and spoke in opposition of the application. Through the aid of a PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Jeffs noted that the application does not conform with Council policies for the Kingston Mixed Corridor, and the one-sided nature of the report does not enable the Committee to make an informed decision. He noted the application does not meet building height guidelines, built form, and setbacks. Mr. Jeffs stated crucial information is missing from the staff report, including height constraints on the north side of Kingston Road, the impact of the proposed density, parking ratios, angular plain requirements, and privacy obligations. He sought clarification on underground parking, surface parking provisions and parking ratios. Mr. Jeffs asked the Committee to deny the application. 4.4 Rob Rollings Re: Report PLN 24-21 Official Plan Amendment OPA 18-005/P Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/18 Highmark (Pickering) Inc. 1640 Kingston Road, 1964 and 1970 Guild Road Rob Rollings, 1974 Guild Road, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection and noted support for the responsible re-development of the subject lands, however raised concerns pertaining to the building heights, compatibility and transitions, the number of units and resulting traffic impacts of the proposal. Mr. Rollings stated that the key changes made to the application, such as the elimination of the daycare are not substantive, as the height and number of units have increased. He advised that the setback requirements have not been met, and that the design does not have the appropriate transitions, and focuses on how it fits with the Kingston Road Corridor, and s hould be reviewed through a Guild Road lens. Mr. Rollings noted there would be an impact of increased traffic, and questioned the rationale of the parking ratios, number of trips per hour, intensification, and overall appropriateness of the development. A brief question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee and Rob Rollings regarding: 5 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes May 3, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Cumming • whether Mr. Rollings had provided a summary of his concerns to City staff; and, • how the removal of the stacked townhouses from the application had increased the buffer between the remaining proposed buildings andincreased the amenity space, with Mr. Rollings commenting that theremoval of the stacked townhouses resulted in an increase in the number of units and height of the buildings. 4.5 Steve Gilchrist Re: Report PLN 24-21 Official Plan Amendment OPA 18-005/P Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/18 Highmark (Pickering) Inc. 1640 Kingston Road, 1964 and 1970 Guild Road Steve Gilchrist, 1995 Royal Road, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection, and asked how these developments improve the quality of life in Pickering. He noted that it subdivides the land, impacts the number of parking spaces, and increases traffic. He advised that a housing mix is needed that is livable, with adequate square footage. Mr. Gilchrist sought clarification on the parking ratio, and the inconsistency of the proposal with the neighbourhood, and long term goals of the City. He expressed concern for water and sewage capacity, and process for allocation. Mr. Gilchrist stated that the application goes beyond the Places to Grow Act, and would set a precedent. He asked that a right turn only onto Guild Road be considered, as well as a reduction in height and number of units and that the Committee consider all aggregate impacts of all developments. 4.6 Rick Gallant Re: Report PLN 24-21 Official Plan Amendment OPA 18-005/P Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/18 Highmark (Pickering) Inc. 1640 Kingston Road, 1964 and 1970 Guild Road Rick Gallant, 1961 Guild Road, joined the electronic meeting via audio connection and noted opposition to the high density apartments, which will impact his privacy and view. He ex pressed concerns regarding waste management services, glare of headlights, road safety, public transportation, and increased traffic on Guild Road. He stated that the traffic survey is not accurate due to it being completed during the Covid-19 pandemic, and encouraged the Committee to deny the application. A brief discussion period ensued with the Committee and Mr. Gallant regarding driveway alignment between his driveway, and the proposed driveway on the 6 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes May 3, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Cumming subject lands. Mr. Gallant noted the proposed driveway was approximately 4 to 5 feet from the fence and that it had not changed the impacts on his privacy. The Committee inquired whether the applicant had followed up with Mr. Gallant, who confirmed that the applicant had provided him with an aerial picture of the tree line and driveway. 4.7 Mike Pettigrew, Planner The Biglieri Group Ltd. Re: Report PLN 24-21 Official Plan Amendment OPA 18-005/P Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/18 Highmark (Pickering) Inc. 1640 Kingston Road, 1964 and 1970 Guild Road Mike Pettigrew, Senior Planner, The Biglieri Group Ltd., joined the electronic meeting via audio connection, on behalf of the applicant. He noted that there had been open houses and publ ic meetings on this application, and that he had corresponded with area residents on various matters, with an attempt to address their comments and speak directly to the issues. Mr. Pettigrew addressed technical comments from commenting agencies, and suggested that matters brought up today may be misinterpretations. He advised that the grading would be matched, and that a storm water management plan, and servicing report was included with the application. He confirmed that there are no adverse impacts allowed by the development, including drainage onto neighbouring properties. Mr. Pettigrew highlighted the soft landscaping and parking report that has been thoroughly reviewed by both City staff and the Region. He advised that the development is transit supportive with justification for providing less parking to encourage residents to utilize public transit, and reduce on-street parking. A question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee and Mike Pettigrew, Senior Planner, The Biglieri Group, regarding: • potential for signalization at Guild Road and Kingston Road, and rapidtransits’ impact on the site in terms of traffic and entrance to the subject lands. Mr. Pettigrew advised that the Metrolinx Plan included signaled lights, which was one of the reasons why the entrance was positioned further north to ensure there is safe operation of that intersection; • sewage and water capacity, and whether there was a need for upgrades inthe future, and how water and sewage capacity is identified along the Kingston Road Corridor. Mr. Pettigrew noted the servicing capacity is determined at the end of the allocation, and it is provided on a first come first serve basis by the Region of Durham through the site plan servicing agreement process; 7 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes May 3, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Cumming • alignment of driveways and whether there was a possible mitigation of light pollution, with Mr. Pettigrew stating that it was his intent to follow-up withthe neighbours to the e ast; • how the removal of stacked townhouses had increased amenity space, permitting 11,000 square feet of amenity space for residents at groundlevel, and rooftop which added to the buffer to the north; • parking space allocation, and parking ratios, with Mr. Pettigrew advising that there is less parking to permit adequate buffers of vegetation, andadditional landscaping. He further explained that the 52 proposed s urfaceparking spaces were for visitors which would be managed by thecondominium board; and, • how the parking ratio rate is intended to encourage residents to utilize public transit, and apartments with reduced parking rates encouraged more transit use, and transit oriented development. Moved by Mayor Ryan Seconded by Councillor Ashe That the Committee take a short recess. Carried The Committee recessed at 9:10 pm and reconvened at 9:17 pm. Upon reconvening, the City Clerk conducted a roll call and certified that all Members of the Committee were once again present, and participating electronically in accordance with By-law 7771/20. 5. Planning & Development Reports 5.1 Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor, Report LEG 06-21 E. Ovide Holdings (Altona) Inc. – Plan of Subdivision 40M-2557 - Final Assumption of Plan of Subdivision - Lots 1 to 12 and Blocks 13 t o 17, Plan 40 M-2557 - File: 40M-2557 Recommendation: Moved by Councillor Ashe Seconded by Councillor Pickles 8 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes May 3, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Cumming 1. That Shadow Place within Plan 40M-2557 be assumed for public use; 2. That works and services required by the Subdivision Agreement within Plan 40M-2557, which are constructed, installed or located on lands dedicated to, or owned by the City, or on lands lying immediately adjacent thereto, including lands that are subject to easements transferred to the City, beaccepted and as sumed for maintenance; 3. That E. Ovide Holdings (Altona) Inc. be released from the provisions of the Subdivision Agreement and any amendments thereto relating to Plan 40M- 2557; 4. That Council enact a by-law to dedicate Block 17, Plan 40M-2557 as apublic highway; and, 5. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take theactions necessary to implement the recommendations in this report. Carried 5.2 Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor, Report LEG 09-21 E. Ovide Holdings (Altona) Inc. – Plan of Subdivision 40M-2558 - Final Assumption of Plan of Subdivision - Block 1, Plan 40M-2558 - File: 40M-2558 Recommendation: Moved by Councillor Pickles Seconded by Councillor Butt 1. That works and services required by the Subdivision Agreement within Plan40M-2558, which are constructed, installed or located on lands dedicated to, or owned by the City, or on lands lying immediately adjacent thereto, including lands that are subject to easements transferred to the City, be accepted and as sumed for maintenance; 2. That E. Ovide Holdings (Altona) Inc. be released from the provisions of theSubdivision Agreement and any amendments thereto relating to Plan 40M- 2558; and, 3. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take theactions necessary to implement the recommendations in this report. 9 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes May 3, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Cumming Carried 5.3 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 23-21 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 04/21 City Initiated Amendment to Seaton Zoning By-law 7364/14 Corner Rounding Zoning Provisions Recommendation: Moved by Councillor Butt Seconded by Mayor Ryan That City Initiated Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 04/21 to amend Seaton Zoning By-law 7364/14, as amended, to include a corner rounding definition and provisions, be endorsed, and that the draft Zoning By-law Amendment containing the standards set out in Appendix I to Report PLN 23-21 be finalized and forwarded to Council. Carried 5.4 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 24-21 Official Plan Amendment OPA 18-005/P Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/18 Highmark (Pickering) Inc. 1640 Kingston Road, 1964 and 1970 Guild Road A question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee and City Development Staff regarding: • the rationale for reduced parking spaces and visitor allotment ratios. NileshSurti, Manager, Development Review & Urban Design, noted that there are0.8 spaces per unit and 0.5 visitor ratios per unit. He advised the ratio is appropriate because of the intensification policy for Kingston Road Corridor to encourage development along Kingston Road, with permissible reducedratios, which will increase transit use, and its proximity to the City Centre. He noted that there would be an increase of on-site bicycle parking toaccess services without a vehicle; • explanation of the traffic study, and concerns from the delegates of 2023/2024 signalization at Guild and Denmark. Mr. Surti stated the traffic study was reviewed by Region and City staff, and looked at the impact onthe intersections, type of units, and trip generation based upon a model of 10 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes May 3, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Cumming various technical calculations. He further noted that the assessment stated the majority of traffic would be going to Guild Road, and is comfortable that the traffic generated would not have a significant impact on residents living north of the proposed development; • ensuring there is adequate water and sewer capacities, with Staffconfirming that this development had the servicing capacity and network that can accommodate this development. Mr. Surti noted that staff worked together with the Region, to update modeling based on density and intensification, in combination with the policies implemented; • how the applicant has made modifications that provide a better buffer to residents, and the Hydro One corridor concept for additional greenspace; • concern of traffic on Guild Road, and how 365 units would comply with the proposed 6-8 trips in the traffic study with Mr. Surti advising that the traffic study is based on engineering modelling, which states it would be 7 trips potentially travelling north. Kyle Bentley, Director of City Development & CBO, noted that it is important to recognize the traffic study was conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic; • how many residents who were content with the original 8-12 storey buildings, and expressed concern with the increased height of 12 and 16 storeys. Mr. Surti advised that the height was assessed with compatibility, using angular plain tools, and impacts of shadowing to ensure the overall height has an appropriate setback. He further noted that there is an 11metre buffer, which has increased onsite greenspace to demonstrate theincreased height will have minimal impact on the residents to the north, andwould meet the intent of the draft urban design guidelines; • how this is a creative plan in terms of aesthetics and density, noting thestudies that had been conducted such as the Kingston Road Corridor intensification study and Established Community Neighburhood Study, andconcerns that this development was not consistent with the fundamental principles of those studies; • the cumulative impact of density in the Kingston Road Corridor; • the decrease in parking, and whether parking spaces could be constructed below ground; • concerns regarding the loss of commercial and retail uses in theneighbourhood. Mr. Surti advised that staff encouraged a mixed-usedevelopment, and how balancing the concerns of residents resulted ineliminating the commercial component to mitigate parking and traffic concerns; • how the traffic study was reviewed by the Region and City staff, with Staff confirming that there were no incorrect calculations or errors identified; • how high density developments have lower parking ratios which results infewer trips and vehicles on site; 11 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes May 3, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Cumming • comments from the delegates and how this application may be inconsistent with various works and studies underway. Mr. Surti advised that theapplication meets the goals and intent of the Official Plan, Zoning By-Law and Kingston Road Corridor Study. He noted each site is unique and needs to be examined on its individual merits, but that overall, this development achieves the objectives of those Plans; and, • utilizing the time between the Planning & Development Committee and when this matter would be considered at Council on May 25th to have staff collaborate with the applicant, and respond to questions and comments by residents so that any outstanding questions could be addressed prior to theMay 25, 2021, Council meeting. Recommendation: Moved by Councillor Ashe Seconded by Mayor Ryan 1. That Official Plan Amendment Application OPA 18-005/P, submitted by Highmark (Pickering) Inc., to re-designate the lands municipally known as 1964 Guild Road from “Urban Residential Areas – Medium Density Areas” to “Mixed Use Areas – Mixed Corridors”, and to permit a maximum residential density of 350 units per net hectare and a maximum floor space index of 2.53 for the portion of the subject lands within the “Mixed Use Areas – Mixed Corridor” designation located at the northwest corner of Kingston Road and Guild Road to facilitate a high-density residential condominium development, be approved, and that the draft by-law to adopt Amendment 43 to the Pickering Official Plan as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN 24-21 be forwarded to Council for enactment; and, 2. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 11/18, submitted by Highmark (Pickering) Inc., to facilitate a high-density residential condominium development consisting o f 346 apar tment units, be approved subject to the provisions contained in Appendix II to Report PLN 24-21, andthat staff be authorized to finalize and forward an implementing Zoning By-law to Council for enactment. Carried on a Recorded Vote as Follows: Yes No Councillor Ashe Councillor Brenner Councillor Cumming Councillor Butt Councillor Pickles Councillor McLean 12 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes May 3, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Cumming Mayor Ryan 5.5 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 26-21 Additions to Municipal Heritage Register 401 Kingston Road, 1 Evelyn Avenue and 882-886 Kingston Road A question and answer period ensued between Members of the Committee and City Development Staff regarding: • whether St. Paul’s-on-the-Hill would be included in the Heritage Rebate Program that was being developed. Elizabeth Martelluzzi, Planner ll – Heritage Program, noted that the heritage rebate program only applied toresidential properties at this time; • the impacts to properties included on the Municipal Heritage Register, with Mr. Bentley advising that endorsement of listing pr operties on the H eritageRegister does not mean designation under the Ontario Heritage Act, but that it afforded time for Council to decide on designation should anapplication come forward to alter or demolish the property; • ensuring that staff engage St. Paul’s on-the-Hill to discuss what heritagedesignation entails, including the parameters of a property being listed tothe Municipal Heritage Register; • how a heritage designation relates to the entire property, not just the building, an d the concerns raised by the Church relating to increased costs and available funding; and, • how the properties being considered for the Heritage Register, met only afew of the determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest criteria, and whether there was value in engaging an architect to make theserecommendations. Recommendation: Moved by Councillor Brenner Seconded by Councillor McLean 1. That Report PLN 26-21 of the Director, City Development & CBO, regarding the listing of 401 Kingston Road, 1 Evelyn Avenue and 882-886 Kingston Road on the Municipal Heritage Register be received; 2. That Council endorse the recommendations of the Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee, dated November 25, 2020, to list 401 Kingston Road, 1 Evelyn Avenue, and 882-886 Kingston Road on the City of Pickering 13 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes May 3, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Cumming Municipal Heritage Register, under Section 27, Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act; 3. That Council authorize staff to pursue designating 882-886 Kingston Road (St. Paul’s-on-the-Hill Anglican Church) under Section 29, Part IV, of the Ontario Heritage Act; and, 4. That staff be directed to take necessary actions to include the properties onthe City of Pickering Municipal Heritage Register. Carried 6. Other Business There was no other business. 7. Adjournment Moved by Councillor Pickles Seconded by Councillor Butt That the meeting be adjourned. Carried The meeting adjourned at 10:18 pm. 14