Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 1, 2021Planning & Development Committee Meeting Agenda March 1, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Pickles Due to COVID-19 and the Premier’s Emergency Orders to limit gatherings and maintain physical distancing, the City of Pickering continues to hold electronic Council and Committee Meetings. Members of the public may observe the meeting proceedings by viewing the livestream. A recording of the meeting will also be available on the City’s website following the meeting. Page 1. Roll Call 2. Disclosure of Interest 3. Statutory Public Meetings Statutory Public Meetings are held to receive input and feedback on certain types of planning applications. Due to the need to hold electronic meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic, members of the public who wish to address the Planning & Development Committee for any matters listed under Statutory Public Meetings may do so via an audio connection into the electronic meeting. To register as a delegate, visit www.pickering.ca/delegation and complete the on-line del egation form or email clerks@pickering.ca by 12:00 noon on the business day prior to the meeting. Please ensure that you provide the telephone number you wish to be called at so that you can be connected via audio when it is your turn to make a delegation. Please be advised that your name and address will appear in the public record and will be posted on the City’s website as part of the meeting minutes. 3.1 Information Report No. 06-21 1 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 03/21 City Initiated Part of Lot 18, Concession 9, Part of Lot 2, Plan 12 (5015 Brock Road) 4. Delegations Due to COVID-19 and the Premier’s Emergency Orders to limit gatherings and maintain physical distancing, members of the public looking to provide a verbal delegation to Members of the Planning & Development Committee for any matters listed under Planning and Development Reports, may do so via an audio connection into the electronic meeting. To register as a delegate, visit www.pickering.ca/delegation, and For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca Planning & Development Committee Meeting Agenda March 1, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Pickles complete the on -line d elegation form or email clerks@pickering.ca. Persons who wish to speak to an item that is on the agenda must register by 12:00 noon on the last business day before the meeting. All delegations for items not listed on the agenda shall register ten (10) days prior to the meeting date. The list of delegates who have registered t o speak will be called upon one by one by the Chair and invited to join the meeting via audio connection. A maximum of 10 minutes shall be allotted for each delegation. Please ensure you provide the phone number that you wish to be contacted on. Please be advised that your name and address will appear in the public record and will be posted on the City’s website as part of the meeting minutes. 5. Planning & Development Reports 5.1 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 09-21 5 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 04/17 Request for Red-Line Revision of Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R) 1133373 Ontario Inc. and Lebovic Enterprises Limited Part of Lot 22, 23, 24 & 25, Concession 4 Seaton Community City of Pickering Recommendation: 1. That the Revision to Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R) submitted by 1133373 Ontario Inc., to permit a red-line revision to a draft approved plan of subdivision on lands being Part of Lots 22, 23, 24 & 25 Concession 4, as shown on the Applicant’s Revised Plan Attachment #2 to Report PLN 09-21, be endorsed; 2. That the proposed amendments to the conditions of draft plan of subdivision approval to implement Draft Plan of Subdivision SP- 2008-11(R) as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN 09-21 be endorsed; 3. That the Local Planning A ppeal Tribunal be advised of City Council’s decision on the request for a red-line revision to Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R) and that the City Solicitor be For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca Planning & Development Committee Meeting Agenda March 1, 2021 Electronic Meeting – 7:00 pm Chair: Councillor Pickles authorized to attend any Local Planning Appeal Tribunal hearing on the requested red-line revision; and, 4. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 04/17, submitted by 1133373 Ontario Inc. and Lebovic Enterprises Limited, to implement the red-line revision to Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R), and rezone a remnant block of land at 1255 Whitevale Road for Community Node uses be approved, and the draft zoning by-law contained in Appendix II to Report PLN 09- 21 be finalized and forwarded to Council for enactment. 5.2 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 11-21 27 Pickering Housing Strategy Study - Status Update Recommendation: That Report PLN 11-21 of the Director, City Development & CBO, providing an update on the status of the City of Pickering Housing Strategy Study, be received for information. 5.3 Director, City Development & CBO, Report PLN 12-21 36 Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 12/18 Stuart Mark Golvin and JMPM Holdings Ltd. Part of Lot 19, Range 3, B.F.C., Part 1, 40R-8832 and Part 1, 40R-10527 (1635 Bayly Street) Recommendation: That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 12/18, submitted by Stuart Mark Golvin and JMPM Holdings Ltd., to permit “animal boarding establishment”, “auction and estate sales house”, “day care centre”, and other site-specific modifications to By-law 6974/09, as amended, on the lands municipally known as 1635 Bayly Street, be approved, and that the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN 12-21 be finalized and forwarded to Council. 6. Other Business 7. Adjournment For information related to accessibility requirements please contact: Committee Coordinator 905.420.4611 clerks@pickering.ca Information Report to Planning & Development Committee Report Number: 06-21 Date: March 1, 2021 From: Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Chief Planner Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 03/21 City Initiated Part of Lot 18, Concession 9, Part of Lot 2, Plan 12 (5015 Brock Road) 1.Purpose of this Report The purpose of this report is to provide preliminary information regarding an application for Zoning By-law Amendment, initiated by the City, to correct a mapping error within Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by the Oak Ridges Moraine Conformity By-law 6640/06. This report contains background information on the proposed amendment. This report is intended to assist members of the public and other interested stakeholders to understand the proposal. Planning & Development Committee will hear public delegations on the applications, ask questions of clarification, and identify any planning issues. This report is for information and no decision on this application is being made at this time. Staff will bring forward a recommendation report for consideration by the Planning & Development Committee upon review of the comments received and revisions to the amendment if necessary. 2.Background Information An application for Zoning By-law Amendment was submitted by Glenda Winterstein for 5015 Brock Road in 2001, to amend Zoning By-law 3037 to permit 5 residential apartment units in addition to the existing commercial uses. Council approved the application for 5 residential dwelling units on June 6, 2005 (Resolution #88/05, Item #3) and passed the amending Zoning By-law 6525/05 on the same day. Following Council’s approval, an appeal was filed by the Region of Durham on the grounds that 5 residential dwelling units could not be properly serviced by the private on-site sewage system. On March 27, 2006 the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) ordered that the Region’s appeal be allowed in part and By-law 6525/05 be amended to permit a maximum of 4 dwelling units and 1 commercial unit on the subject property. In 2005, during the processing of the rezoning application submitted by Glenda Winterstein for 5015 Brock Road and appeal of the By-law to the OMB, a City initiated rezoning was commenced to amend Zoning By-law 3037, to implement the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan. Through this rezoning, the subject property was proposed to be rezoned to “ORM-C2-1” which, in addition to various commercial uses permitted in the “ORM-C2” zone, permits a maximum of 4 dwelling units. This maintained the residential use rights obtained through the Zoning By-law Amendment application submitted by Glenda Winterstein. - 1 - Information Report 06-21 Page 2 However, a mapping error was made and the subject property was zoned “ORM-C2” on the Zoning Schedule, permitting various commercial uses only. Amending By-law 6640/06 to implement the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan was approved by Council, with the mapping error, on March 6, 2006 and approved by the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing on October 22, 2009. The error was discovered when the owner of 5015 Brock Road recently placed her property up for sale and a lawyer’s zoning compliance request for the property identified the zoning as “Oak Ridges Moraine – General Commercial (ORM-C2)”. The City of Pickering is proposing to correct the mapping error within Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by the Oak Ridges Moraine Conformity By-law 6640/06. The purpose of the amendment is to reinstate the zone designation for the subject property to that which existed with the passing of By-law 6640/06, restoring the residential use rights of a maximum of 4 dwelling units on the subject property and the required parking provisions. 3.Proposed Zoning Amendment City staff propose to amend Schedule 8 of By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06, to rezone the subject property from “Oak Ridges Moraine – General Commercial (ORM-C2)” Zone to “ORM-C2-1” Zone. 4.Public Notice In addition to the standard departments and agencies, written notice of the Statutory Public Meeting was provided to landowners within 150 metres of the subject property. The notice was also posted on the City’s website. 5.Comments Received The application was circulated for comment on February 8, 2021. 5.1 Public Comments As of writing this report, no comments have been received from the public. 5.2 Agency Comments As of writing this report, no comments have been received from external agencies. 5.3 City Department Comments As of writing this report, no comments have been received from internal departments. 6.Planning & Design Section Comments The following is a summary of key concerns/issues or matters of importance raised to date: •City staff have identified 5019 Brock Road, the abutting lot to the north of the subject property, as also being incorrectly zoned as “ORM-C2-1” on Schedule 8 of By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640/06. The correct zoning for this property is “ORM-C2”. •City staff intend to initiate another application for Zoning By-law Amendment to correct the mapping error on 5019 Brock Road, and any other mapping error identified within the Hamlet of Claremont. - 2 - Information Report No. 06-21 Page 3 Further issues may be identified following receipt and review of comments from the circulated departments, agencies and public. The City Development Department will conclude its position on the application after it has received and assessed comments from the circulated departments, agencies and public. 7.Information Received •None required. 8.Procedural Information 8.1 General •written comments regarding this proposal should be directed to the City Development Department; •oral comments may be made at the Electronic Statutory Public Meeting; •all comments received will be noted and used as input to a Recommendation Report prepared by the City Development Department for a subsequent meeting of Council or a Committee of Council; •any member of the public who wishes to reserve the option to appeal Council’s decision must provide comments to the City before Council adopts any by-law for this proposal; and •any member of the public who wishes to be notified of Council’s decision regarding this proposal must request such in writing to the City Clerk. 9.Owner/Applicant Information The City is the applicant. Attachment: 1.Location Map Prepared By: Original Signed By: Approved/Endorsed By: Original Signed By: Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Chief Planner Isabel Lima Planner I Original Signed By: Deborah W ylie, MCIP, RPP Manager, Zoning & Administration IL:DW:ld Date of Report: February 12, 2021 - 3 -   Brock Road Central Street Dow Street William Street Lane Street BarclayStreetFranklin Street Wellington Street Lorn StreetVictoria Street Livingston StreetCanso Drive ClaremontMemorial Park ClaremontPublicSchool © The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: © Queens Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.All rights reserved.;© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers all rights reserved.; © Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its suppliers all rights reserved.; City DevelopmentDepartment Location MapFile:Applicant:Property Description: A 03/21 Date: Feb. 05, 2021 ¯ E City of PickeringPart of Lot 18 Con 9 S, Part of Lot 2 Plan 12(5015 Brock Road) SubjectLands L:\PLANNING\01-MapFiles\A\2021\A 03-21 - City of Pickering\A03_21_LocationMap.mxd 1:4,000SCALE:THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. Attachment #1 to Information Report 06-21 - 4 - Report to Planning & Development Committee Report Number: PLN 09-21 Date: March 1, 2021 From: Kyle Bentley Director, City Development & CBO Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 04/17 Request for Red-Line Revision of Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R) 1133373 Ontario Inc. and Lebovic Enterprises Limited Part of Lot 22, 23, 24 & 25, Concession 4 Seaton Community City of Pickering Recommendation: 1.That the Revision to Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R) submitted by 1133373 Ontario Inc., to permit a red-line revision to a draft approved plan of subdivision on lands being Part of Lots 22, 23, 24 & 25 Concession 4, as shown on the Applicant’s Revised Plan Attachment #2 to Report PLN 09-21, be endorsed; 2.That the proposed amendments to the conditions of draft plan of subdivision approval to implement Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R) as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN 09-21 be endorsed; 3.That the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal be advised of City Council’s decision on the request for a red-line revision to Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R) and that the City Solicitor be authorized to attend any Local Planning Appeal Tribunal hearing on the requested red-line revision; and 4.That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 04/17, submitted by 1133373 Ontario Inc. and Lebovic Enterprises Limited, to implement the red-line revision to Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R), and rezone a remnant block of land at 1255 Whitevale Road for Community Node uses be approved, and the draft zoning by-law contained in Appendix II to Report PLN 09-21 be finalized and forwarded to Council for enactment. Executive Summary: 1133373 Ontario Inc. and Lebovic Enterprises Limited have requested a revision to a portion of the draft approved plan of subdivision in the Lamoreaux Neighbourhood, and to rezone a remnant block of land at 1255 Whitevale Road for Community Node uses within the Wilson Meadows Neighbourhood in the Seaton Community. This draft plan of subdivision was approved by the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) (see Location Map, Attachment #1). The applicant has requested a zoning by-law amendment in order to implement the proposed revisions to the draft approved plan of subdivision. - 5 - Report PLN 09-21 March 1, 2021 Subject: 1133373 Ontario Inc. and Lebovic Enterprises Limited Page 2 (A 04/17, SP-2008-11(R)) The proposed revisions to the draft plan of subdivision are appropriate and conform to the Central Pickering Development Plan, the Pickering Official Plan, and the Lamoreaux and Wilson Meadows Neighbourhood policies. The revisions to the draft plan do not alter the overall plan’s design and the inclusion of additional lands to the Wilson Meadows Neighbourhood community node block completes the development area. Staff recommend that Council approve a red-line revision to a draft approved plan of subdivision, endorse the amended conditions of approval as set out in Appendix I, approve the Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 04/17, endorse the implementing zoning provisions contained in Appendix II, and authorize staff to finalize and forward an implementing Zoning By-law to Council for enactment. Financial Implications: No direct costs to the City are anticipated as a result of the proposed applications. 1.Background 1.1 Property Description The subject lands are generally located north of Taunton Road and south of Whitevale Road, on both the east and west sides of Sideline 22 and Sideline 24 within the Wilson Meadows and Lamoreaux Neighbourhoods (see Location Map, Attachment #1). The lands covered by Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R) have a land area of approximately 53 hectares. The remnant parcel located at 1255 Whitevale Road has an area of approximately 0.8 of a hectare. The surrounding lands are all owned by the Province and are designated Seaton Natural Heritage System. Beyond the Seaton Natural Heritage lands are privately owned lands subject to other draft plans of subdivisions. 1.2 Applicant’s Proposal The original Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11 was draft approved by the OMB in December 2013. The related zoning that implements the subdivision, being the Seaton Zoning By-law 7364/14, was confirmed by the Province through an Order in Council in March 2014. Since these approvals, the landowner has commenced detailed design for the draft plan of subdivision. This has resulted in engineering and urban design modifications to certain roads and the lotting fabric of the approved draft plan of subdivision. The majority of the draft plan of subdivision and zoning remains unchanged as the revisions mostly affect the area in the central portion of the draft plan, west of Sideline 22. The overall lot yield and land uses are consistent with the approved draft plan (see Submitted Revised Draft Plan of Subdivision, Attachment #2). The existing topography is challenging and altering the proposed grading to a more workable design resulted in minor modifications to roads and lotting fabric of the approved draft plan of subdivision. - 6 - Report PLN 09-21 March 1, 2021 Subject: 1133373 Ontario Inc. and Lebovic Enterprises Limited Page 3 (A 04/17, SP-2008-11(R)) The other part of the application is to amend the zoning by-law for a remnant parcel of land in the Community Node block. This parcel, municipally know as 1255 Whitevale Road, is designated Mixed Use Areas – Community Node by the Pickering Official Plan. These lands were not owned by any of the Seaton Landowners Group and therefore, were not zoned as part of the Seaton Zoning By-law. Now that these lands have been acquired by Lebovic Enterprises Limited, who control the abutting lands zoned Community Node, the applicant is requesting the lands be rezoned to Community Node to ensure the lands can be developed in a comprehensive fashion in the future (see Submitted Plan – 1255 Whitevale Road, Attachment #3). 2. Comments Received 2.1 May 8, 2017 Public Information Meeting and Written Comments No members of the public who attended the meeting voiced comments regarding the proposed applications. No comments have been received from the public as a result of circulation of the public notice of the applications. 2.2 City Departments & Agency Comments 2.2.1 Region of Durham • the proposed amendment to the draft approval implements engineering design modifications that facilitates improved intersection designs and overcomes grading issues; • no objection to the proposed amendment to the draft plan and the existing Regional conditions of approval are appropriate with the change to reflect the revised plan; and • the proposed rezoning of the remnant rural residential lot to a community node zone conforms to the applicable policies therefore the Region has no concerns with the zoning amendment. 2.2.2 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority • no objections to the approval of the zoning by-law amendment or the revision to the draft approved plan of subdivision and the existing conditions of approval are appropriate with the change to reflect the revised plan; and • technical matters can be addressed through the implementation of the conditions of approval. 2.2.3 City of Pickering Engineering Services Department • no objection; technical matters can be addressed through the implementation of the conditions of approval through the detailed design exercise. - 7 - Report PLN 09-21 March 1, 2021 Subject: 1133373 Ontario Inc. and Lebovic Enterprises Limited Page 4 (A 04/17, SP-2008-11(R)) 2.2.4 Durham District School Board • no objections to the proposal; and • the existing conditions of approval as approved by the OMB be revised to incorporate amended Durham District School Board conditions of approval as outlined in Appendix I. 2.2.5 Durham Catholic District School Board • no objections to the proposal; and • the existing conditions of approval as approved by the OMB be revised to incorporate amended Durham Catholic District School Board conditions of approval as outlined in Appendix I. 2.2.6 Other Agencies • no other agency that provided comments on the applications expressed any concern with the proposed land use; and • detailed design matters can be addressed in the fulfillment of the conditions of approval. 3. Planning Analysis 3.1 The revised draft plan of subdivision conforms to the Central Pickering Development Plan, the Pickering Official Plan and is consistent with the policies for the Lamoreaux and Wilson Meadows Neighbourhoods The original applications, as approved by the OMB, were in conformity with the policies and provisions of the Central Pickering Development Plan, the Pickering Official Plan, and the Lamoreaux and Wilson Meadows Neighbourhood Plans. The revisions to the draft plan of subdivision are considered minor in nature. Matters such as land use, density, natural heritage preservation, sustainable development, servicing, and urban design have not been impacted by the revisions. 3.2 The revised draft plan of subdivision will improve the design of the core area of the draft plan and facilitate meeting engineering design requirements With the commencement of detailed design for the draft plan, it was concluded the original draft plan would result in unsafe and inappropriate road grades. In order to incorporate the existing topography and enhance road safety, the street and lotting fabric have been redesigned to address the grading challenges, while maintaining the intent of the approved draft plan. The revised draft plan maintains the principle of a walkable, connective and open space accessible design. This proposal is consistent with the City’s urban design goals and objectives in the Seaton Sustainable Placemaking Guidelines. - 8 - Report PLN 09-21 March 1, 2021 Subject: 1133373 Ontario Inc. and Lebovic Enterprises Limited Page 5 (A 04/17, SP-2008-11(R)) 3.3 The zoning of the remnant parcel into a draft approved community node block will complete the area in terms of land use and urban design The Community Node designation at the southwest quadrant of the Alexander Knox Road and Peter Mathews Drive incorporates 1255 Whitevale Road. Thus, the Pickering Official Plan contemplates that this parcel would complete the overall development of this Community Node. Details of the Community Node development will be the subject of a future Site Plan Application. Although 1255 Whitevale Road is designated as Community Node, it retained its Agricultural zoning since it was not owned by a member of the Seaton Landowners Group, and thus, not subject to the zoning by-law amendment application that led to Seaton Zoning By-law 7364/14. The lands abutting 1255 Whitevale Road have been zoned CN-Community Node and the subject property is intended to be part of the Community Node development. Lebovic Enterprises Limited has now acquired 1255 Whitevale Road, and the amendment to rezone the subject property as CN-Community Node is considered a housekeeping amendment. The addition of this parcel will allow the urban design envisioned in the Neighbourhood Plan to be achieved. The rezoning of this parcel will complete the zoning for this area of Seaton. 3.4 Technical matters will be addressed as conditions of subdivision approval Detailed design issues will be dealt with through the subdivision agreement process. The draft plan conditions of approval ensure that all of the City’s technical, financial, and other matters will be addressed prior to the finalization of the draft plan of subdivision. 4. Conclusion The applicant’s proposal satisfies the applicable Pickering Official Plan policies for the Lamoreaux and Wilson Meadows Neighborhoods, and also addresses the appropriate urban design requirements as established in the Seaton Sustainable Placemaking Guidelines. The applicant has worked with City staff and external agencies to address various technical requirements. It is recommended that the revised Conditions of Approval for Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R) be endorsed by Council, as set out in Appendix I to this Report. Condition A-1 is the condition that identifies the actual plan being approved. Specific blocks that have been renumbered in the revised draft plan of subdivision, and are referenced in an existing draft plan condition, are now listed as revised conditions of approval. All of the other City of Pickering existing draft plan conditions will remain the same. The Conditions of Approval for the two school boards have been amended, as per their request and are reflected in Appendix I. - 9 - Report PLN 09-21 March 1, 2021 Subject: 1133373 Ontario Inc. and Lebovic Enterprises Limited Page 6 (A 04/17, SP-2008-11(R)) Staff supports the rezoning application and recommends that the draft implementing by-law provided as Appendix II to this Report be finalized and brought before Council for enactment. The proposed revision to the draft approved plan of subdivision and application to amend the zoning by-law are considered to be minor modifications to the development that was previously approved by the OMB, and therefore, continues to represent good planning. These applications are: •consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020; •in conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020; •in conformity with the Central Pickering Development Plan; •in conformity with the Durham Region Official Plan; and •in conformity with the City of Pickering Official Plan. 4.1 Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) is the Approval Authority for this Revision to the Draft Plan of Subdivision As the subject draft plan of subdivision was approved by the OMB, the LPAT is also the approval authority for the requested revision. If Council supports the requested revision, it is anticipated that the owner and the City will approach the LPAT to approve the requested revision. 4.2 Applicant’s Comments The applicant supports the recommendations of this report. Appendices Appendix I Recommended Revised Conditions of Approval for Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R) Appendix II Recommended Zoning By-law Amendment A 04/17 Attachments: 1.Location Map 2.Submitted Revised Draft Plan of Subdivision 3.Submitted Plan – 1255 Whitevale Road - 10 - Report PLN 09-21 March 1, 2021 Subject: 1133373 Ontario Inc. and Lebovic Enterprises Limited Page 7 (A 04/17, SP-2008-11(R)) Approved/Endorsed By: Original Signed By: Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Chief Planner Original Signed By: Kyle Bentley, P. Eng. Director, City Development & CBO Prepared By: Original Signed By: Ross Pym Principal Planner, Strategic Initiatives RP:ld Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Original Signed By: Marisa Carpino, M.A. Chief Administrative Officer - 11 - Appendix I to Report No. PLN 09-21 Recommended Revised Conditions of Approval for Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R) - 12 - Original Ontario Municipal Board Approved Draft Plan Condition A-1, Section C Number 15 and 73, Section E and Section F, for Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11, dated December 2, 2013: Section A – General 1. The Owner shall prepare the final plan generally on the basis of the draft plan of subdivision prepared by GHD, identified as Project Number 03479 drawing MLDP-8, revised and dated November 2013 which illustrates 450 lots for detached dwelling units, 87 lots for 174 semi detached dwelling units, 78 blocks for 468 townhouse dwelling units, a future residential development block, 2 school blocks, a park block, a village green block, trail head blocks, open space blocks, a stormwater management facility block, walkway blocks, roadways and road widening blocks. Section C – City of Pickering 15. That the Owner convey to the City of Pickering the park block (Block 616) and the village green blocks (Block 617, 618 and 621) at no cost and in a physical condition acceptable to the City for parkland dedications, to the satisfaction of the Director, City Development, in order to satisfy Section 42(1) of the Planning Act. 73. That the Owner construct to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering trail heads within or abutting the draft plan and described as north of Lot 537, Block 621, south side of Street “T” at Sideline 22, on the west side of Sideline 22 opposite Lot 537, north of Lot 440 next to Sideline 22, north and south side of Street “B” extension next to Lots 298 and 388, Block 620, Block 618, west of Lot 1, Block 619, north of the northwest corner of Block 615, north of the northeast corner of Block 615 and north of Lot 252 all to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering. Section E – Durham District School Board 1. That the Owner agrees to reserve Block 614 within the subject draft plan SP-2008-11 for public elementary school purposes, having a minimum area of 2.47 hectares (6.10 acres), for a period of 5 years from the date of registration of the phase of the plan that contains the school site, unless prior to the expiration of such reservation period the Durham District School Board advises the Owner, in writing, that it does not intend to acquire the Block for school purposes. 2. Prior to the registration of any phase of Plan SP-2008-11 that contains Block 614 the Owner shall enter into an Agreement with the Durham District School Board regarding the acquisition of Block 614 Plan SP-2008-11 for an elementary school, substantially in accordance with the form of the Option Agreement pertaining to such school block attached as Schedule “B” to the Minutes of Settlement between the Owner and the School Board, dated November 27, 2013. - 13 - 3. That the following “Notice to Parents” be inserted in all agreements of purchase and sale between the Owner and all prospective homebuyers. “Students from this development may have to attend existing schools. Although a school site has been reserved within this plan of subdivision, a school may not be constructed for some time, if at all, and then only if the Ministry of Education authorizes funding and construction of this required school.” 4. That the Owner agrees to post the standard Durham District School Board approved “Notice to Parents” in all sales presentation centers. The “Notice to Parents" reads as follows: “Students from this development may have to attend existing schools. Although a school site has been reserved within this community, a school may not be constructed for some time, if at all, and then only if the Ministry of Education authorizes funding and construction of this required school.” Section F – Durham Catholic District School Board 1. That the Owner agrees to reserve Block 615 within the subject draft plan SP-2008-11 for Catholic Secondary School purposes, having a minimum area of 6.95 hectares (17.17 acres), for a period of 7 years from the date of registration of the phase of the plan that contains the school site, unless prior to the expiration of such reservation period the Durham Catholic District School Board advises the Owner, in writing, that it does not intend to acquire the Block for school purposes. 2. Prior to the registration of any phase of Plan SP-2008-11 that contains Block 615 the Owner shall enter into an Agreement with the Durham Catholic District School Board regarding the acquisition of Block 615 Plan SP-2008-11 for a secondary school, substantially in accordance with the form of the Option Agreement pertaining to such school block attached as Schedule “B” to the Minutes of Settlement between the Owner and the School Board, dated November 27, 2013. 3. That the following "Notice to Parents" be inserted in all agreements of purchase and sale between the Owner and all prospective homebuyers. “Students from this development may have to attend existing schools. Although a school site has been reserved within this plan of subdivision, a school may not be constructed for some time, if at all, and then only if the Ministry of Education authorizes funding and construction of this required school.” 4. That the Owner agrees to post the standard Durham Catholic District School Board approved "Notice to Parents" in all sales presentation centers. The "Notice to Parents" reads as follows: “Students from this development may have to attend existing schools. Although a school site has been reserved within this community, a school may not be constructed for some time, if at all, and then only if the Ministry of Education authorizes funding and construction of this required school.” - 14 - Recommended Revised Draft Plan Condition for Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11(R), Condition A-1, Section C Number 15 and 73, Section E and Section F, for Draft Plan of Subdivision SP-2008-11 (all other Draft Plan Condition remain as originally approved): Section A – General 1. The Owner shall prepare the final plan generally on the basis of the draft plan of subdivision prepared by GHD, identified as Project Number 03479 drawing MLDP-11, revised and dated July 2020 which illustrates 415 lots for detached dwelling units, 95 lots for 190 semi detached dwelling units, 79 blocks for 484 townhouse dwelling units, 2 school blocks, a park block, a village green block, trail head blocks, open space block, a stormwater management facility block, walkway blocks, reserve blocks, roadways and road widening blocks. Section C – City of Pickering 15. That the Owner convey to the City of Pickering the park block (Block 594) and the village green/trail head blocks (Block 596, 597, 598 and 599) at no cost and in a physical condition acceptable to the City for parkland dedications, to the satisfaction of the Director, City Development, in order to satisfy Section 42(1) of the Planning Act. 73. That the Owner construct to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering trail heads within or abutting the draft plan and described as north of Lot 454, Block 599, south side of Virgo Crescent at Sideline 22, on the west side of Sideline 22 opposite Lot 454, north of Lot 356 next to Sideline 22, north and south side of Elizabeth Mackenzie Drive extension next to Lots 290 and 291, Block 598, Block 597, west of Lot 1, Block 596, north of the northwest corner of Block 593, north of the northeast corner of Block 593 and north of Lot 242 all to the satisfaction of the City of Pickering. Section E – Durham District School Board 1. That the Durham District School Board requires Block 592 (2.47 hectares) in conjunction with a joint use agreement for the use of the adjacent neighbourhood Park, Block 594. 2. That the Owner and the Durham District School Board enter into an agreement for the acquisition of Block 592 for elementary school purposes. 3. That the Owner submit plans indicating existing and proposed grades, drainage and servicing for approval by the Durham District School Board for all lots, blocks, easements and roads abutting Block 592. 4. That the Owner provide the Durham District School Board with a report detailing the soil bearing capacity and composition of soils within Block 592, prior to the registration of Phase 1 of the development. Specifically, the report will detail the chemical composition of soils and the presence of methane and/or radon gas within Block 592. 5. That any filling conducted within Block 592 meet the Durham District School Board criteria for soil bearing capacity and be approved by the Durham District School Board soils engineer. - 15 - 6. That the Owner rough grade Block 592 to the satisfaction of the Durham District School Board. 7. That the Owner agrees to bring all municipal services and connections to the edge of Block 592, along the street and submit drawings to the Durham District School Board for approval. 8. That the Owner agrees to install a 1.8 metre galvanized or vinyl coated chain link fence of standard school construction (#9 gauge galvanized) along the perimeter of Block 592 where it abuts proposed or existing residential lands (lots or blocks), and/or any other proposed or existing land use, except for active municipal parkland. 9. That the following "Notice to Parents" be inserted in all agreements of purchase and sale between the Owner and all prospective homebuyers: "Students from this development may have to attend existing schools. Although a school site has been reserved within this plan of subdivision, a school may not be constructed for some time, if at all, and then only if the Durham District School Board receives funding for the construction of this required school." 10. That the Owner agrees to post the standard Durham District School Board approved "Notice to Parents" in all sales representation centres. Section F – Durham Catholic District School Board 1. That prior to final approval, the Owner shall have made Agreement satisfactory to the Durham Catholic District School Board for the transfer of a Catholic secondary and/or elementary school site as shown in the plan submission. The secondary school site, Block 593 shall contain not less than 6.95 hectares. The elementary school site, Block 593 shall contain not less than 2.47 hectares. 2. That the Owner shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement in wording satisfactory to the Durham Catholic District School Board: (i) to grade Block 592 and 593 and in doing so compact, fill with clean material, replace any topsoil disturbed in the grading process and at the same time sod/seed the same lands to specifications determined by the Board; (ii) to remove any buildings on Block 592 and 593; (iii) to remove trees, as required to accommodate school layout; (iv) to provide a letter of credit pertaining to stockpiling and removal of topsoil, by taking the volume of topsoil to be stored upon the school site and multiplying such volume by 125% of the current market prices for waste material disposal, as set forth in the latest version of Hanscomb's Yardsticks for Costing, Cost Data for the Canadian Construction Industry, to the satisfaction of the Durham Catholic District School Board; - 16 - (v) to remove stockpiled topsoil within 30 days of written notice by the Board and in doing so compact, fill with clean material, replace any topsoil disturbed in the grading process and at the same time sod/seed the same lands to specifications determined by the Board; (vi) to construct a galvanized chain link fence, Type II 3.8 centimetres mesh, 1.8 metres high along all boundaries of the school block, including road frontage(s) at the discretion of the Board; (vii) to construct the fences prior to the issuance of building permits in an appropriate phase to the satisfaction of the Board; (viii) to erect and maintain a sign on the Catholic school site at such time as the relevant access roads are constructed, indicating that the date has not been set for the construction of the school; (ix) to provide a geotechnical investigation and Phase 1 and Phase 2 environmental site assessment conducted by a qualified engineer. For a secondary school site a minimum of sixteen boreholes shall be required and a minimum of eight boreholes for the elementary school site; (x) to provide the foregoing at no cost to the Board; and (xi) to assume any upstream and downstream charges for hydro, natural gas, sanitary and storm drainage, and water supply. 3. That the Owner shall submit to the Durham Catholic District School Board, at no cost to the Board, a letter from a qualified consultant concerning: (i) the suitability of Block 592 and 593 for school construction purposes, relating to soil bearing factors, surface drainage, topography and environmental contaminants; and (ii) the availability of natural gas, electrical, water, storm sewer and sanitary sewer services. 4. That the Owners shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement, in wording acceptable to the Durham Catholic District School Board that the services referred to in Condition 3. (ii) shall be installed to the mid-point of the frontage of the elementary school site and positioned as designated by the Board, at no cost to the Board. 5. That prior to final approval, the owners shall submit to the School Board an initial set of engineering plans for review and approval, and subsequently, a copy of the final engineering plans as approved by the City of Pickering which indicate the storm drainage system, utilities, and the overall grading plans for the complete subdivision area. 6. That prior to final approval, the local hydro authority shall have confirmed in writing to the Board that adequate electrical capacity will be supplied to the school site frontage by the developer at no cost to the Board. - 17 - 7. That the Durham Catholic District School Board shall advise that Conditions 1. to 6. inclusive have been met to its satisfaction. The clearance letter shall include a brief statement detailing how each condition has been satisfied or carried out. 8. That the subdivision agreement include warning clauses advising that their children may have to attend an existing school, outside of their immediate neighbourhood, although a site in the area has been reserved for a school building, a school may not be built for several years, if at all, and only then if it can be justified to the satisfaction of the Ministry of Education. 9. That the subdivision agreement between the developer and the City of Pickering provide for the installation of sidewalks throughout the development, thereby allowing for a safe pedestrian walking route to the school site. - 18 - Appendix II to Report No. PLN 09-21 Recommended Draft Zoning By-law Amendment A 04/17 - 19 - The Corporation of the City of Pickering By-law No. XXXX/21 Being a By-law to amend Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 7364/14, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham, for land at Part of Lot 22, 23, 24 & 25 Concession 4, City of Pickering (A 04/17) Whereas the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering received an application to rezone portions of the subject lands being Part of Lot 22, 23, 24 & 25 Concession 4, in the City of Pickering to permit revisions to a draft approved plan of subdivision; and And whereas an amendment to Zoning By-law 7364/14, is deemed necessary to permit the requested revisions; Now therefore the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as follows: 1. Schedule I and II Schedule I and II attached hereto with notations and references shown thereon are hereby declared to be part of this By-law. 2. Area Restricted The provisions of this By-law shall apply to those lands in Part of Lot 22, 23, 24 & 25, Concession 4, in the City of Pickering, designated “LD1, LD2, LD2-M, MD-DS, MD-M, MCC, CN, CU, OS, SWM” on Schedule I attached hereto. 3. General Provisions No building, structure, land or part thereof shall hereafter be used, occupied, erected, moved or structurally altered except in conformity with the provisions of this By-law. 4. By-law 7364/14 By-law 7364/14, is hereby further amended only to the extent necessary to give effect to the provisions of this By-law as it applies to the area set out in Schedules I and II to this By-law. Definitions and subject matters not specifically dealt with in this By-law shall be governed by relevant provisions of By-law 7364/14. Draft - 20 - By-law No. XXXX/21 Page 2 5. Effective Date This By-law shall come into force in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. By-law passed this XXth day of XXXX, 2021. ___________________________________ David Ryan, Mayor ___________________________________ Susan Cassel, City Clerk Draft Draft - 21 - i Taunton Road N Sapphire Drive CU/LD1 CU/LD1-T CU/OS LD1 LD2 MD-M MCC OS LD2LD1 OS CU/LD1-TCU/LD1 CU-MD-M MD-DS MD-M MD-DS MD-M LD2-MLD1 OS CN-1 MD-DS LD-1 SWM MD-M LD1 OSLD2-M LD2 LD2-M LD2 LD1 OS MD-DS Schedule I t XXXX/21 XXrd Passed This o By-Law Day of XXXX 2021 Mayor Clerk - 22 - Whitevale Road LD1-5 OS MD-M CN SWM A A A A MD-M LD1-T MD-M LD1 LD1 A LD1 LN MD-M LD1 MD-DS LD1 CNCN-PP A A A SWM LD1-T MD-DS CU CU LD1 CN Clerk Mayor Schedule II to By-Law Passed This Day of i NXXXX/21XXrd XXXX 2021 72.7m 104.9m105.3m81.5m - 23 - TAUNTON ROAD WHITEVALE ROAD SIDELINE 26SIDELINE 22SIDELINE 24TILLINGS ROADMULBERRY LANEPRIVATE ROAD DUSTY DRIVESIDELINE 241:20,000 SCALE: © The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: © Queens Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; © Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers all rights reserved.; © Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its suppliers all rights reserved.; PN-RU City Development Department Location MapFile:Applicant:Property Description: A04/17 & SP-2008-11(R) 1133373 Ontario Ltd Part Lots 22, 23, 24, & 25, Concession 4 THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. Date: Apr. 05, 2017 SUBJECTLANDS EEE Attachment #1 to Report #PLN 09-21 - 24 - L:\Planning\01-MapFiles\A\2020 Jan 22, 2021DATE: Applicant: Property Description: File No: Submitted Revised Draft Plan of Subdivision FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. City Development Department A 04/17 & SP-2008-11(R) Lebovic Enterprises Limited Part of Lot 22, 23, 24 & 25 Concession 4 Attachment #2 to Report #PLN 09-21 - 25 - DATE: APPLICANT: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: FILE No: N Submitted Plan - 1255 Whitevale Road FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. City Development Department A04/17 1133373 Ontario Ltd Part Lots 22, 23, 24, & 25 Concession 4 April 5, 2017 Attachment #3 to Report #PLN 09-21 - 26 - Report to Planning & Development Committee Report Number: PLN 11-21 Date: March 1, 2021 From: Kyle Bentley Director, City Development & CBO Subject: Pickering Housing Strategy Study - Status Update - File: D-1300-014 Recommendation: 1. That Report PLN 11-21 of the Director, City Development & CBO, providing an update on the status of the City of Pickering Housing Strategy Study, be received for information. Executive Summary: Council directed staff to undertake a Housing Strategy Study that will result in a comprehensive strategy and action plan that addresses the need for delivering more lifecycle housing options, including affordable and accessible units, to support changing demographic conditions. Details of the purpose and objectives of the Housing Strategy Study can be found in the June 15, 2020 Report PLN 05-20 to the Planning & Development Committee. The Study is currently in Phase 1. Next steps include additional engagement opportunities and the preparation of a Draft Housing Strategy and Action Plan for circulation, review, and comment. Financial Implications: There are no financial implications applicable to this report. Discussion: 1. Purpose The purpose of this report is to update Council on staff’s progress on the Housing Strategy Study. 2. Background 2.1 Study Initiation On June 15, 2020, following the consideration of Report PLN 05-20, Council directed City Development staff to undertake a comprehensive housing strategy study. A link to Report PLN 05-20 is available on the Housing Strategy Study page of the City website. - 27 - Report PLN 11-21 March 1, 2021 Subject: Housing Strategy Study Status Update Page 2 2.2 Study Purpose The purpose of the Housing Strategy Study is to: • establish the City’s role and priorities with facilitating opportunities for developing housing, affordable housing, and age-friendly housing in Pickering over the next 10 years (2021 – 2031); • assist Council with decision making; • provide a framework for staff in implementing its responsibilities, including those that relate to the coordination of actions with other agencies, organizations and governments; • assist in guiding residential growth within the City; • aid in the education and creation of general public awareness of what the City is doing on this issue; and • provide a mechanism to monitor progress as the City works to implement its plan. 2.3 Study Objectives The key objective of the Housing Strategy Study is to provide a framework so that the City can ensure that there is a supply of suitable (as it relates to the size of the household), adequate (as it relates to physical condition) and affordable (as it relates to household income) housing for all ages and abilities within its jurisdiction. This will help to ensure that the City meets the housing needs in support of a diverse population and workforce. 2.4 Study Process The Housing Strategy Study consists of 3 phases: • Phase 1: Research and Gap Analysis; • Phase 2: Draft Housing Strategy and Action Plan; and • Phase 3: Recommended Housing Strategy and Action Plan. There are engagement opportunities for the public and stakeholders throughout the Study. We are currently in Phase 1 of the Study. 3. Study Status Since the launch of the Study, City staff: • Have undertaken research and analysis to determine the housing gaps within the City. Staff are in the process of finalizing the Research and Gap Analysis Report. In addition to collecting information and data on the City’s demographic profile, socio-economic characteristics of households and housing stock, and associated trends and forecasts, the report contains information pertaining to the policy and legislative context for the provision of affordable housing. Once complete, the Research and Gap Analysis Report will be made available to Council and the public; • Hosted an electronic public open house on January 21, 2021 with 3 “live” delegates and 3 additional delegates that provided comments via email (as of the writing of this report, there have been 131 views of the YouTube recording of the meeting); and • Are coordinating stakeholder meeting(s) with government, not-for-profit, and other agencies and associations, including the development and building industry. - 28 - Report PLN 11-21 March 1, 2021 Subject: Housing Strategy Study Status Update Page 3 4. Engagement City staff created a Housing Strategy Study webpage, which went live on January 6, 2021. Electronic Public Open House 1, the first public engagement opportunity for the Study, was advertised on the Community Page of the News Advertiser on January 7 and 14, 2021, as well as on the City’s website. In addition, a news release was issued on January 14, 2021, followed by social media messages. City staff also sent notice of the Electronic Public Open House directly to members of the Accessibility Advisory Committee, Seniors Community Services Council, and the Age Friendly Steering Committee. 4.1 Summary of January 21, 2021 Electronic Public Open House The following highlights some comments and questions received either by email or at the January 21, 2021 Electronic Public Open House. A complete summary of comments/questions and staff responses is contained in Attachment #1 to this report. • Rent-to-own/lease-to-own options should be made available near transit, shops, and other amenities. • What is Pickering’s plan for seniors’ developments, including detached bungalows with garages? • The Study should look into encouraging rooming/lodging house licenses and basement units as it provides essential affordable housing options. • The City is encouraged to mandate affordable housing through Inclusionary Zoning policies and zoning by-laws. • We are part of the aging population of Pickering and we own our home and would love to get old in it. Property taxes are a large part of the housing cost and we have seen ours increased by 60 percent in the last 15 years and it seems that the trend is continuing. At this rate, ever increasing taxes are eroding house affordability. How do you see retirees being able to afford the property taxes for their home? • The City should look at encouraging more mixed-use development. • When looking at new affordable housing, the City should ensure that “corners do not get cut” during construction that could result in substandard housing. 5. Next Steps Next steps include, completing the Research and Gap Analysis Report and initiating Phase 2. Phase 2 of the Study includes: • considering the feedback from the Phase 1 engagement opportunities; • preparing a Draft Housing Strategy and Action Plan; • hosting a Public Open House to hear feedback on the Draft Housing Strategy and Action Plan; • circulating the Draft Housing Strategy and Action Plan to Stakeholders for their input; and • reporting to Planning & Development Committee. - 29 - Report PLN 11-21 March 1, 2021 Subject: Housing Strategy Study Status Update Page 4 Phase 3 of the Study will include consideration of the feedback from the Phase 2 engagement, the preparation of a Recommended Housing Strategy and Action Plan, and a recommendation report to Planning & Development Committee. Attachment: 1.January 21, 2021 Electronic Public Open House 1, Summary of Comments/Questions and Staff Responses Prepared By: Original Signed By: Margaret Kish, MCIP, RPP Principal Planner, Policy Original Signed By: Déan Jacobs, MCIP, RPP Manager, Policy & Geomatics MK:ld Approved/Endorsed By: Original Signed By: Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Chief Planner Original Signed By: Kyle Bentley, P. Eng. Director, City Development & CBO Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Original Signed By: Marisa Carpino, M.A. Chief Administrative Officer - 30 - Housing Strategy Study January 21, 2021 Electronic Public Open House 1 Summary of Comments/Questions and Staff Responses Item Number Comments/Questions Staff Response 1. We would like to own a home. Rent-to-own/lease- to-own options would be great to include as part of the Study. These housing options would be great to have locations near transit, shops, other amenities. The Housing Strategy Study will be looking at how the City can facilitate a variety of options for housing type and tenure, including rent-to-own/lease-to-own options. City staff will be hosting stakeholder meetings with the development and building industry, as well as not-for-profit and government agencies, to hear what they have to say about the provision for this, and other housing options. 2. Why does Pickering not have more senior housing similar to Amica Swan Lake in Markham, Eastern Gate and Northern Gate Retirement Community in Stouffville, or Wilmont Creek Retirement Community in Newcastle? Amica Swan Lake in Markham is a seniors’ living complex (3-4 storey building, wide range of amenities). Eastern Gate & Norther Gate are attached bungalows using a form of life-lease (e.g., right-to-occupy agreement). Wilmont Creek in Newcastle are bungalows, residents do not own them but lease the land on which the bungalows sit. These examples provide a variety of ownership styles and tenures. In addition to City policy, market conditions and fluctuations drive what type of housing can be made available. The City encourages the widest range of typologies. Through the Study, we will identify additional role(s) the City can take in providing a range of housing typologies. Viva Retirement Home provides independent and assisted living opportunities for seniors in Pickering and is located at Kingston Road and Glengrove Road. Amica Pickering is a seniors lifestyle building currently under construction at the northeast corner of Glenanna Road and Pickering Parkway. In addition, City staff is reviewing a seniors residence application from Chartwell proposed to be located at Kingston Road and Valley Farm Road. Attachment #1 to Report #PLN 11-21 - 31 - Housing Strategy Study January 21, 2021 Electronic Public Open House 1 Summary of Comments/Questions and Staff Responses Item Number Comments/Questions Staff Response 3. What is Pickering’s plan for senior development including detached bungalows with garages? Pickering’s land value has dramatically increased in the last few years and this has impacted whether this option would be affordable for seniors downsizing. City staff will be hosting stakeholder meetings with the development and building industry, as well as not-for-profit and government agencies, to hear what they have to say about the provision for this, and other, housing options. 4. The current cost of housing in Pickering does not offer affordable options for a variety of residents ranging from Registered Nurses to individuals on Ontario Works (OW) or Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP). Because of this, some people require shared living quarters with others or they will face potential homelessness. Many tenants in this form of housing are considered vulnerable populations (e.g., essential workers, seniors, co-op students, individuals living with a disability, racialized individuals). Surrounding municipalities have made rooming/lodging house licenses difficult and seem to be discouraging them. This can lead to increased levels of homelessness. I do not want Pickering to discourage this type of housing. Discouraging this type of housing violates guidelines set out by the Ontario Human Rights Commission (Room for everyone: Human rights and rental housing licensing). This Study should look into encouraging rooming/lodging house licenses and basement units as it provides essential affordable housing options. The City of Pickering Official Plan policies encourage the provision of a wide variety of housing types and tenure to meet the needs of existing and future populations of the City, including shared living accommodation. As with the construction of all types of housing, shared accommodation must meet the requirements of the Ontario Building Code (OBC) for building and fire safety. Other concerns that arise with shared accommodation include the amount of parking provided. The City does not prohibit people from sharing housing accommodation, and there is no zoning by-law prohibition on rooming/lodging houses in Pickering. - 32 - Housing Strategy Study January 21, 2021 Electronic Public Open House 1 Summary of Comments/Questions and Staff Responses Item Number Comments/Questions Staff Response 5. When looking at new affordable housing, the City should ensure that “corners do not get cut” during construction that could result in substandard housing. All construction is required to meet the Ontario Building Code (OBC). The City of Pickering Building Services staff review plans and inspect construction to ensure that the OBC requirements are met. There are no reductions in performance standards for affordable housing construction within the OBC. 6. The Province enables municipalities, like Pickering, to mandate affordable housing through Inclusionary Zoning policies and zoning by-laws. I encourage the City to implement this. Inclusionary Zoning is a relatively new “tool” introduced by the Province to enable municipalities to require a certain amount of affordable housing as part of new developments. Through the Housing Strategy Study, the City will be examining how this tool can be implemented, and the merits to its implementation. 7. Will the Study be looking at transitional housing? Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s National Housing Strategy Glossary of Terms defines “Transitional Housing” as housing that is intended to offer a supportive living environment for its residents, including offering them the experience, tools, knowledge and opportunities for social and skill development to become more independent. It is considered an intermediate step between emergency shelter and supportive housing, and has limits on how long an individual or family can stay. Stays are typically between 3 months and 3 years. The Study will also be considering Transitional Housing. - 33 - Housing Strategy Study January 21, 2021 Electronic Public Open House 1 Summary of Comments/Questions and Staff Responses Item Number Comments/Questions Staff Response 8. We are part of the aging population of Pickering. We own our home and we would love to get old in it. It seems that property taxes are a big part of the housing cost. They increased 60 percent in the last 15 years and it seems that the trend is growing. At this rate ever increasing taxes are eroding house affordability. When the minimum wage is 15-16 CAD and old age security is around 1,000 how do you see retirees afford the property bill on their home? The concern over increased property taxes and its impact on housing affordability will be reviewed in consultation with the City’s Finance Department, through the subsequent phases of the study. 9. We need to see more broad housing types also with other types of development. Such as mixed-use development. For example a site that contains not only owned units but also affordable housing and rental units alongside commercial/retail space all built together on the same site. So I would like the City to look more at encouraging mixed-use development moving forward in the housing strategy. The City, through the Study, will examine opportunities to strengthen and expand its housing policies and zoning by-law provisions to facilitate more housing types and affordable housing as part of mixed-use developments. 10. There are a lot of working class people who are not able to purchase a home. Is there a plan for any new co-op housing to be built to reduce the number of people on current waiting lists [for subsidized housing]? Currently there are no development applications for co-op housing in Pickering. This Study will examine different types of housing and how the City can help to facilitate affordable housing including co-op housing. 11. What are Pickering’s policies with respect to basement apartments? Currently the City of Pickering’s zoning by-laws refer to basement apartments as Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and permit a total of two residential units on one property, subject to meeting certain conditions. - 34 - Housing Strategy Study January 21, 2021 Electronic Public Open House 1 Summary of Comments/Questions and Staff Responses Item Number Comments/Questions Staff Response These conditions include that the property have a minimum of 3 parking spaces, the ADU occupy no more than 100 square metres, and that a home-based business is prohibited in either dwelling unit of a dwelling containing an accessory dwelling unit. ADUs in the City of Pickering are governed by the Two-Dwelling Unit By-law No. 7579/17 and must be registered in order to ensure that the two-dwelling unit property meets required safety standards and can be located for providing emergency response. Changes to the Planning Act, introduced through the More Homes, More Choice Act in 2019, permit a total of three residential units on one property. Some of the changes introduced include: • requiring municipalities to permit second units in detached, semi-detached, and row houses in primary dwellings and within ancillary buildings or structures; • prohibiting municipalities from applying a development charge for second units above garages or in laneways, or built in new homes (subject to restrictions); and • requiring municipalities to permit two units in either the primary dwelling unit or in any ancillary building, effectively allowing up to three residential units on a single lot. The Housing Strategy Study will review the new provincial requirements and how they impact existing policy and regulations. - 35 - Report to Planning & Development Committee Report Number: PLN 12-21 Date: March 1, 2021 From: Kyle Bentley Director, City Development & CBO Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 12/18 Stuart Mark Golvin and JMPM Holdings Ltd. Part of Lot 19, Range 3, B.F.C., Part 1, 40R-8832 and Part 1, 40R-10527 (1635 Bayly Street) Recommendation: 1.That Zoning By-law Amendment Application A 12/18, submitted by Stuart Mark Golvin and JMPM Holdings Ltd., to permit “animal boarding establishment”, “auction and estate sales house”, “day care centre”, and other site-specific modifications to By-law 6974/09, as amended, on the lands municipally known as 1635 Bayly Street, be approved, and that the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as set out in Appendix I to Report PLN 12-21 be finalized and forwarded to Council. Executive Summary: The subject lands are located on the south side of Bayly Street, west of Brock Road within the Brock Industrial Neighbourhood (see Location Map, Attachment #1). The site has approvals for the development of 7 separate buildings (see Site Plan, Attachment #2). As of the writing of this report, 3 buildings have been constructed and are occupied by various tenants. Through consultation with the Region of Durham and the City, the applicant has modified their requested amendments to the existing site-specific zoning by-law. The modifications include: •removing all sensitive land uses including place of worship, private school, and art gallery/studio; •adding animal boarding establishment, auction and estate sales house, day care centre, and retail store; •amending the special regulations provisions of the site-specific by-law to permit a sales outlet accessory to an auction and estate sales house; •increasing the maximum number of restaurants – Type A permitted on the site from 3 to 6 while capping the maximum gross leasable floor area for all restaurant uses at 1,300 square metres; and •updating Schedule I to By-law 6974/09, as amended, to reflect new hatching areas designating where specific uses are permitted on the site. A Transportation Impact Study submitted by the applicant concludes that the existing and proposed list of uses along with the applicant’s requested site-specific amendments will not impact the existing road network. The Region of Durham has determined that the traffic signals at the intersection of Bayly Street and Salk Road are not warranted, and does not maintain an alternating 300 metre and 500 metre pattern for traffic signals for east-west Type A Arterial roads (Bayly Street). The total supply of 300 parking spaces at full build-out is adequate to accommodate the parking demands for the existing and proposed list of uses. - 36 - Report PLN 12-21 March 1, 2021 Subject: Stuart Mark Golvin and JMPM Holdings Ltd. (A 12/18) Page 2 A new site specific by-law has been prepared reflecting the combined list of permitted and proposed uses with appropriate restrictions and provisions. The draft by-law is attached as Appendix I and is recommended to be finalized and forwarded to Council for enactment. Financial Implications: The recommendations of this report do not present any financial implications for the City. Discussion: 1.Background 1.1 Property Description The subject lands are located on the south side of Bayly Street, west of Brock Road within the Brock Industrial Neighbourhood (see Location Map, Attachment #1). The subject lands comprise 2 properties having a combined area of approximately 2.7 hectares with approximately 210 metres of frontage along Bayly Street and approximately 75 metres of frontage along Dillingham Road. In 2012, the City issued Site Plan Approval, along with subsequent amendments in 2015 and 2017 to facilitate the development of the subject lands for 7 separate buildings. The subject property supports 3 industrial/commercial buildings, and future phases include an additional 4 buildings to be constructed at a later date (see Approved Site Plan, Attachment #2). The table below summarizes the total gross floor area of the existing and future buildings, and the uses currently occupied within the existing buildings. Gross Floor Area Existing Uses Building ‘A’ 187 square metres A restaurant (Harvey’s) with a drive-through facility Building ‘B’ 364 square metres A restaurant (St. Louis Bar and Grill) and a personal service shop (Pretty Girl Lounge) Building ‘C’ 427 square metres To be constructed Building ‘D’ 595 square metres To be constructed Building ‘E’ 5,245 square metres To be constructed Building ‘F’ 1,177 square metres Multiple units occupied by a printing establishment (The Printing House), two personal service shops (Kut Kapabilities and Coco Nail Bar & Spa), a professional office (mortgage office), chiropractor (Balanced Health & Wellness), commercial club (I Love Kickboxing), and Madison Homes condominium sales office. There is currently one vacant unit. Building ‘G’ 889 square metres To be constructed - 37 - Report PLN 12-21 March 1, 2021 Subject: Stuart Mark Golvin and JMPM Holdings Ltd. (A 12/18) Page 3 Surrounding land uses include (see Air Photo Map, Attachment #3): North: Across Bayly Street is the Pickering Playing Fields sports and entertainment complex, Pickering Fire Station #5, and various industrial/commercial buildings containing a mix of automotive related stores and services. East: To the east along Bayly Street is a vehicle sales establishment and vacant lands that were previously occupied by an automobile service station. Along the north side of Dillingham Road is a mix of industrial/commercial buildings. South: Immediately to the south is an outdoor storage facility of equipment and trailers, and further south across Dillingham Road is a Bingo hall. West: To the west is the Hydro Corridor, and further west is a mix of industrial/commercial uses along the south side of Bayly Street. 1.2 Applicant’s Proposal The intent of this rezoning application is to expand the list of permitted uses to allow the property owner further flexibility in leasing the units to a wider range of businesses. The applicant is requesting to amend the existing zoning for the subject lands to permit additional uses on the site, and to make certain changes to the existing Special Regulations of the site-specific zoning by-law. Based on further discussions with the Region of Durham and the City, the applicant has eliminated certain existing and proposed uses that are considered to be sensitive land uses, and that did not comply with Region of Durham and the City of Pickering’s Official Plans. These uses are place of worship, private school, and art gallery/studio. The table on the next page provides a summary of the existing and proposed (in bold) uses, as well as the location of the existing and proposed uses on the subject property. - 38 - Report PLN 12-21 March 1, 2021 Subject: Stuart Mark Golvin and JMPM Holdings Ltd. (A 12/18) Page 4 Existing Schedule I to Zoning By-law 6974/09, as amended by Zoning By-law 7519/16 Proposed Revision to Schedule I Uses permitted in only Horizontally Hatched area •day care centre Uses permitted in only Cross Hatched area •banquet facility •commercial club •exhibition hall •place of amusement or entertainment •club •commercial-recreational establishment •place of assembly Uses permitted in only Diagonally and Horizontally Hatched areas •convenience store •financial institution •restaurant – type A •dry cleaning depot •personal service shop •retail store Uses permitted in All Areas •bakery •commercial school •food preparation plant •light manufacturing plant •office-associated commercial establishment •rental establish •scientific, medical or research laboratory •warehouse •business office •dry cleaning establishment •light machinery and equipment supplier •merchandise service shop •professional office •sales outlet •vehicles sales establishment •animal boarding establishment •auction and estate sales house - 39 - Report PLN 12-21 March 1, 2021 Subject: Stuart Mark Golvin and JMPM Holdings Ltd. (A 12/18) Page 5 The applicant is also proposing the following modifications to the Special Regulations of the site-specific zoning by-law: •permit a sales outlet accessory to an auction and estate sales house; •increase the maximum number of permitted restaurants – type A from 3 to 6; •increase the maximum aggregate gross floor area for restaurants – type A from 1,000 square metres to 1,300 square metres; and •permit 1 place of amusement or entertainment use with a maximum gross leasable floor area of 150 square metres on the northerly half of the subject lands fronting Bayly Street. In addition to the requested amendments, the applicant is also proposing to redesign Building ‘E’ as 2 separate buildings (see Revised Conceptual Site Plan, Attachment #4). The north building, Building ‘E1’, is approximately 1,782 square metres and is intended to accommodate multiple units for different users. The main entrances for those units will face north towards Bayly Street. The proposed southerly building, Building ‘E2’, is approximately 3,101 square metres and will allow for a single occupant intended for an employment-type use, such as manufacturing, light industrial or warehousing. Vehicular access to this building will be from Dillingham Road. These modifications will be addressed through a subsequent site plan application. Upon completion, a total of 300 parking spaces are to be provided. Vehicular access for the site is a restricted right-in/right-out access on Bayly Street at the west end of the site, a full-movement access on Bayly Street opposite Salk Road, and a full-movement access on Dillingham Road. 2.Comments Received 2.1 March 4, 2019 Statutory Public Meeting A Statutory Public Meeting was held on March 4, 2019 at which no members of the public attended the meeting to voice their concerns regarding the proposal, and no written comments have been received to date. At this meeting, Committee members expressed concerns regarding the future traffic flow at the intersection of Brock Road and Bayly Street, and questioned whether the Region of Durham would be receptive to signalization at the intersection of Bayly Street and Salk Road. 2.2 Region of Durham Comments •the Region does not object to the proposed rezoning application; •the existing and proposed additional uses are limited to serve the immediate Employment Area; •a Record of Site Condition (RSC) was filed by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks. The RSC was required to permit a day care use on lands that may have been remediated to an industrial standard rather than a standard for a sensitive use; and •the Region does not support the signalization of the Bayly Street and Salk Road intersection due to its proximity to an existing signalized intersection at Brock Road and Bayly Street (for further discussion see Section 3.2 of this report). - 40 - Report PLN 12-21 March 1, 2021 Subject: Stuart Mark Golvin and JMPM Holdings Ltd. (A 12/18) Page 6 3.Planning Analysis 3.1 Proposed additional uses conform with the policies of the Durham Region Official Plan and the City’s Official Plan The Region of Durham Official Plan (ROP) designates the subject lands as “Employment Areas” in the Urban System, with a “Regional Corridor” overlay along Bayly Street. Employment areas allow for a range of employment uses, which include: manufacturing; assembly and processing of goods; service industries; research and development facilities; warehousing; offices and business parks; hotels; storage of goods and materials; and freight transfer and transportation facilities. Designations in the respective area municipal official plan will further identify the appropriate locations for these uses. Limited personal service and retail uses, serving the immediate designated employment area may be permitted as a minor component (e.g., 10 percent) of the aggregate gross floor area of the uses in the designated Employment Area, and no single use shall exceed 500 square metres. Furthermore, retail sales as a minor ancillary component of an industrial operation may be permitted, subject to the inclusion of appropriate provisions in the Pickering Official Plan and/or Zoning By-law. Residential uses, nursing and retirement homes, elementary and secondary schools, and places of worship are not permitted in Employment Areas. However, other sensitive uses may be permitted as an exception, by amendment to Pickering’s zoning by-law, subject to compatibility. Within the City’s Official Plan, the subject lands fall within two separate land use designations. The northerly portion of the subject lands along Bayly Street is designated as “Employment Areas – Mixed Employment”, and the southerly portion along Dillingham Road is designated as “Employment Areas – General Employment”. The site-specific zoning by-law permits select uses on the north and south parcels to align with the corresponding Official Plan land use designation and the applicable policies. Lands designated as Mixed Employment are located generally along arterial roads that provide for a broad range of employment uses, including light manufacturing, warehousing, offices and other supportive service commercial uses such as limited personal service uses, restaurants, and limited retailing of goods and services serving the area. Lands designated as General Employment are located within the interior of the City’s employment areas, and typically permit uses that are associated with the heaviest industrial uses and outdoor storage with potential for noise, vibration, odour or dust emissions. Uses permitted in this designation include, but are limited to: manufacturing; assembly; processing of goods; service industries; offices as a minor component of an industrial operation or serving the area; limited personal service uses serving the area; restaurants serving the area; retail sales as a minor component of an industrial operation; and community, cultural and recreational uses. The employment area policies within the ROP are more current and restrictive, and any amendments shall be in conformity with the ROP. - 41 - Report PLN 12-21 March 1, 2021 Subject: Stuart Mark Golvin and JMPM Holdings Ltd. (A 12/18) Page 7 To achieve conformity with the ROP, the applicant has agreed to eliminate an existing use currently permitted in the by-law and proposed uses that are not compatible with other industrial uses and are not permitted within the “Employment Areas” designation of the ROP. These uses include place of worship, private school, and art gallery/studio. The applicant has also relocated the proposed outdoor play area for the proposed day care use to the northwest corner of the Building ‘G’, away from the existing outdoor storage use immediately to the south. The Region of Durham has confirmed that the requested uses and the site-specific amendments conform with the Regional Official Plan and appears to be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement as it does not introduce land use conflicts between sensitive/non-sensitive uses on the subject site. The proposed uses and the requested site-specific amendments comply with the City’s Official Plan, and will provide flexibility to lease out existing vacant spaces and develop the remainder of the subject lands. In addition, the additional uses will serve the surrounding employment uses. The additional uses will not erode the industrial function of the subject lands. 3.2 The additional requested uses and amendments will not impact the existing road network, and the signalization of Bayly Street and Salk Road is not warranted In support of the rezoning application, the applicant has submitted an updated Transportation Impact Study (TIS), prepared by WSP Group Canada Limited (WSP), dated June 2020, in response to comments received from the Region of Durham and the City. The TIS considered the existing traffic conditions and the future trip generation, and distribution of the proposed and existing permitted uses. All traffic data was collected between April and June of 2018 (before the COVID-19 pandemic). The consultant concluded that the existing and proposed uses on the site have different peak periods, which result in a manageable number of site-generated trips that do not overload the adjacent transportation network or the intersection of Brock Road and Bayly Street. However, the consultant noted that the full build-out of the site will trigger the need for a signalized intersection so that vehicles can enter and exit the site, and Salk Road without significant delay. The Region of Durham has reviewed the applicant’s request to signalize the intersection of Bayly Street and Salk Road, and based on their review, the Region does not support the proposed traffic signal due to its proximity to the intersection of Brock Road and Bayly Street. The Region maintains an alternating 300 metre and 500 metre pattern for traffic signals for east-west Type A Arterial roads. The Bayly Street and Salk Road intersection is approximately 250 metres from the existing Brock Road and Bayly Street signalized intersection. The Region indicates that an exception is not warranted at this location because it would not effectively mitigate future traffic congestion. The Region will continue to monitor the intersection for future signalization requirements or other modifications such as turning restrictions. - 42 - Report PLN 12-21 March 1, 2021 Subject: Stuart Mark Golvin and JMPM Holdings Ltd. (A 12/18) Page 8 3.3 Sufficient parking supply is available to accommodate the additional uses To ensure that a sufficient supply of parking is available to support the existing and proposed uses, a parking survey was conducted by WSP on Saturday, September 30, 2017, and Tuesday, October 2, 2017 to measure the existing parking demand on the site. Upon full build out of the site, a total of 300 parking spaces are to be provided. The TIS analyzed the proposed uses and approximate GFAs within the approved buildings to determine estimated trip distribution. It was determined that with the wide range of proposed land uses that have different patterns of demand, and that the proposed supply of 300 parking spaces will be sufficient to accommodate future parking demands. The recommended parking rates for the existing and proposed uses were analyzed with reference to existing city parking standards. The parking rates for the existing use remain the same, except for the parking rate for a commercial club use, which has been reduced. The implementing zoning by-law will include the following parking rates for the additional requested uses and a revised parking rate for commercial club: Animal Boarding Establishment 4.5 parking spaces per 100 square metres gross leasable floor area Auction and Estate Sales House 5.5 parking spaces per 100 square metres gross leasable floor area Commercial Club reduced from 8.3 parking spaces per 100 square metres per gross leasable floor area to 5.5 parking spaces per 100 square metres of gross leasable floor area Day Care Centre 2.5 parking spaces per 100 square metres of gross leasable floor area Retail Store 5.5 parking spaces per 100 square metres of gross leasable floor area Staff have reviewed the requested parking standards and determined that they are consistent with other parking rates in the City, and recognize that the 300 parking spaces are sufficient to accommodate the recommended rates. 4.Conclusion The requested list of uses and the site-specific amendments will provide flexibility for the applicant to lease the units within the existing building to a more diverse range of businesses. The proposed uses are also in conformity with the Regional Official Plan and the City’s Official Plan. Staff support the rezoning application to permit animal boarding establishment, auction and estate sales house, day care centre, and retail store, as well as modifications to the Special Regulations to the existing site-specific zoning by-law. For these reasons, staff recommends that the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as set out in Appendix I to this report be finalized and forwarded to Council for enactment. - 43 - Report PLN 12-21 March 1, 2021 Subject: Stuart Mark Golvin and JMPM Holdings Ltd. (A 12/18) Page 9 5.Applicant’s Comments The applicant has been advised of and concurs with the recommendations of this report. Appendix Appendix I Draft Implementing Zoning By-law Attachments: 1.Location Map 2. Approved Site Plan 3.Air Photo Map 4.Revised Conceptual Site Plan Prepared By: Approved/Endorsed By: Felix Chau Catherine Rose, MCIP, RPP Planner I Chief Planner Nilesh Surti, MCIP, RPP Kyle Bentley, P. Eng. Manager, Development Review Director, City Development & CBO & Urban Design FC:NS:ld Recommended for the consideration of Pickering City Council Marisa Carpino, M.A. Chief Administrative Office - 44 - Original Signed By:Original Signed By: Original Signed By:Original Signed By: Original Signed By: Appendix I to Report No. PLN 12-21 Draft Implementing Zoning By-law - 45 - The Corporation of the City of Pickering By-law No. XXXX/21 Being a by-law to amend Zoning Restricted Area (Zoning) By-law 2511, as amended, to implement the Official Plan of the City of Pickering, Region of Durham, on Part of Lot 19, Range 3, B.F.C., Part 1, 40R-8832 and Part 1, 40R-10527, in the City of Pickering. (A 12/18) Whereas the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering passed By-law 6974/09 amending By-law 2511 to broaden the range of employment uses in addition to the existing employment uses in Part of Lot 19, Range 3, B.F.C., Part 1, Plan 40R-8832 and, Part 1 on Plan 40R-10527, in the City of Pickering; Whereas the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering passed By-law 7519/16 amending By-law 6974/09 by removing the “(H)” Holding Symbol preceding the “MC-21” Zone designation on Part of Lot 19, Range 3, B.F.C., Part 1, 40R-8832 and Part 1, 40R-10527; And whereas the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering supports the further expansion of the list of permissible uses on the site; Now therefore the Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering hereby enacts as follows: 1. Schedule I Schedule I attached hereto with notations and references shown thereon are hereby declared to be part of this By-law. 2. Area Restricted The provisions of this By-law shall apply to those lands on Part of Lot 19, Range 3 B.F.C., Part 1, 40R-8832 and Part 1, 40R-10527 in the City of Pickering, designated “MC-21” on Schedule I attached hereto. 3. Text Amendment 1. Section 4. Definitions, of By-law 6974/09 is hereby amended by renumbering and re-alphabetizing this subsection in order to incorporate the new definitions as follows: (2) “Animal Boarding Establishment” shall mean a building, structure or part thereof, where dogs and cats and other domesticated animals, excluding livestock, are bred, raised, groomed, trained or kept or a fee on a temporary basis and may include outdoor facilities; Draft - 46 - By-law No. XXXX/21 Page 2 Draft (3) “Auction and Estate Sales” shall mean a building or part of a building where auctions are conducted and may include a warehouse component wherein products are stored on the premises until such time that a public auction is held; (12) “Day Care Centre” shall mean indoor and outdoor premises where more than five children are provided with temporary care and/or guidance for a continuous period but does not provide overnight accommodation and are licensed in accordance with the applicable Provincial Act; (32) “Retail Store” shall mean a premises in which goods and merchandise are offered or kept for retail sale or rental to the public. 2. Section 5.(1) Uses Permitted (“MC-21”) of By-law 6974/09, is hereby repealed and replaced with the following permitted uses: Uses permitted in All Hatched Areas as illustrated in Schedule I attached hereto Uses permitted in only Diagonally and Horizontally Hatched Areas as illustrated in Schedule I attached hereto Uses permitted in only Cross Hatched Areas as illustrated in Schedule I attached hereto Uses permitted in only Horizontally Hatched Areas as illustrated in Schedule I attached hereto Animal boarding establishment Convenience store Banquet facility Day care centre Auction and estate sales house Dry cleaning depot Club Bakery Financial institution Commercial club Business office Personal service shop Commercial- recreational establishment Commercial school Restaurant – Type A Exhibition hall Dry cleaning establishment Retail store Place of amusement or entertainment Food preparation plant Place of assembly Light machinery and equipment supplier Light manufacturing plant Merchandise service shop Office-associated commercial establishment - 47 - By-law No. XXXX/21 Page 3 Draft Uses permitted in All Hatched Areas as illustrated in Schedule I attached hereto Uses permitted in only Diagonally and Horizontally Hatched Areas as illustrated in Schedule I attached hereto Uses permitted in only Cross Hatched Areas as illustrated in Schedule I attached hereto Uses permitted in only Horizontally Hatched Areas as illustrated in Schedule I attached hereto Printing establishment Professional office Rental establishment Sales outlet Scientific, medical or research laboratory Vehicle sales establishment Warehouse 3. Section 5.(2)(c)(ii) Parking Requirements of By-law 6974/09 is hereby repealed and replaced with the following provisions: 1.8 parking spaces per 100 square metres gross leasable floor area 2.5 parking spaces per 100 square metres gross leasable floor area 4.5 parking spaces per 100 square metres gross leasable floor area 5.5 parking spaces per 100 square metres gross leasable floor area 8.3 parking spaces per 100 square metres gross leasable floor area 10 parking spaces per 100 square metres gross leasable floor area Bakery Day care centre Animal boarding establishment Auction and estate sales house Banquet facility Exhibition hall Dry cleaning establishment Business office Club Food preparation plant Commercial club Commercial school Light machinery and equipment supplier Convenience store Commercial- recreational establishment Light manufacturing plant Dry cleaning depot Place of amusement or entertainment Printing establishment Financial institution Place of assembly - 48 - By-law No. XXXX/21 Page 4 Draft 1.8 parking spaces per 100 square metres gross leasable floor area 2.5 parking spaces per 100 square metres gross leasable floor area 4.5 parking spaces per 100 square metres gross leasable floor area 5.5 parking spaces per 100 square metres gross leasable floor area 8.3 parking spaces per 100 square metres gross leasable floor area 10 parking spaces per 100 square metres gross leasable floor area Rental establishment Merchandise service shop Scientific, medical or research laboratory Office- associated commercial establishment Vehicle sales establishment Personal service shop Warehouse Professional office Retail store Sales outlet Restaurant – Type A 4. Section 5.(2)(d)(i) to 5.(2)(d)(iv) Special Regulations of By-law 6974/09 is hereby repealed and replaced with the following: (i) Sales outlet shall be permitted only if accessory to an auction and estate sales house, a bakery, a food preparation plant, a light manufacturing plant, a merchandise service shop, a manufacturing plant, a printing establishment, or a warehouse, provided the gross leasable area of the sales outlet does not exceed 25% of the gross leasable floor area of the auction and estate sales house, bakery, food preparation plant, light manufacturing plant, merchandise service shop, printing establishment, or warehouse; (ii) Notwithstanding Clause (i) above, a sales outlet may exceed 25% up to a maximum of 40% of the gross leasable floor area of the auction and estate sales house, bakery, food preparation plant, light manufacturing plant, merchandise service shop, printing establishment, or warehouse, provided the aggregate gross leasable floor area of all sales outlets in a building does not exceed 25% or the total gross leasable floor area in that building; (iii) A maximum of 6 Restaurants – Type A shall be permitted; (iv) The maximum aggregate gross leasable floor area for Restaurants – Type A shall be 1,300 square metres; - 49 - By-law No. XXXX/21 Page 5 Draft (v) In addition to a Place of Amusement or Entertainment being permitted in the Cross Hatched Areas, a maximum of one (1) Place of Amusement or Entertainment facility shall be permitted within the Diagonally or Horizontally Hatched Areas up to a maximum gross leasable floor area of 150 square metres. 4. Schedule I Amendment Schedule I to By-law 6974/09, as amended by By-law 7519/16, is hereby further amended by revising the existing hatching and adding a new hatching on Schedule 1, as amended By-law 7519/16, on Part of Lot 19, Range 3, B.F.C., Part 1, 40R-8832 and Part 1, 40R-10527, as set out on Schedule I attached hereto. 5. By-law 2511 By-law 2511, as amended, is hereby further amended only to the extent necessary to give effect to the provisions of this By-law. Definitions and subject matters not specifically dealt with in this By-law shall be governed by relevant provisions of By-law 2511, as amended. 6. Effective Date This By-law shall come into force in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. By-law passed this XX day of XXXX, 2021. ________________________________ David Ryan, Mayor ________________________________ Susan Cassel, City Clerk Draft Draft - 50 - MC-21 MC-21 MC-21 Bayly Street Dillingham RoadSalk RoadClerk Mayor Schedule I to By-LawAmended by By-LawPassed ThisDay of i N7519/16 XXrd XXXX 202131.0mXXXX/21 45.0m 50.3m 116.3m 111.1m 213.0m 61.3m87.8m70.1m75.2m50.8m 39.6m - 51 - BrockRoadDillingham RoadBayly Street Ramp Alliance RoadOrangebrook CourtSalk RoadPlummer S t re e t Quigley Street Don BeerArena © The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: © Queens Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; © Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers all rights reserved.; © Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its suppliers all rights reserved.; City DevelopmentDepartment Location MapFile:Applicant:Property Description: A 12/18 Date: Feb. 09, 2021 ¯EStuart Mark Golvin and JMPM Holdings LtdPart of Lot 19, Range 3, B.F.C., Part 1, 40R-8832 and Part 1, 40R-10527 (1635 Bayly Street) HydroLands SubjectLands L:\PLANNING\01-MapFiles\A\2018\A 12-18 Stuart Mark Golvin; JMPM Holdings Ltd\A12_18_LocationMap.mxd 1:5,000 SCALE:THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. HydroLands Attachment #1 to Report #PLN 12-21 - 52 - L:\Planning\01-MapFiles\A\2020 Feb 9, 2021DATE: Applicant: Property Description: File No: Approved Site Plan FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. City Development Department A 12/18 Stuart Mark Golvin and JMPM Holdings Ltd Part of Lot 19, Range 3, B.F.C., Part 1, 40R-8832 and Part 1, 40R-10527 (1635 Bayly Street) Building ‘F’Building ‘G’ Building ‘B’Building ‘A’Building ‘C’ Building ‘D’ Building ‘E’ BAYLY STREET DILLINGHAM ROAD Attachment #2 to Report #PLN 12-21 - 53 - BrockRoadDillingham RoadBayly Street Ramp Alliance RoadOrangebrook CourtSalk RoadPlummer S t re e t Quigley Street 1:5,000 SCALE: © The Corporation of the City of Pickering Produced (in part) under license from: © Queens Printer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.;© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, Department of Natural Resources. All rights reserved.; © Teranet Enterprises Inc. and its suppliers all rights reserved.; © Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and its suppliers all rights reserved.; City DevelopmentDepartment THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. Date: Feb. 09, 2021 L:\PLANNING\01-MapFiles\A\2018\A 12-18 Stuart Mark Golvin; JMPM Holdings Ltd\A12_18_AirPhoto.mxd ¯ESubjectLands File:Applicant:Property Description: A 12/18Stuart Mark Golvin and JMPM Holdings Ltd Air Photo Map Part of Lot 19, Range 3, B.F.C., Part 1, 40R-8832 and Part 1, 40R-10527 (1635 Bayly Street) Attachment #3 to Report #PLN 12-21 - 54 - L:\Planning\01-MapFiles\A\2020 DATE:Feb 9, 2021 Applicant: Property Description: File No: Revised Conceptual Site Plan FULL SCALE COPIES OF THIS PLAN ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CITY OF PICKERING CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. City Development Department A 12/18 Stuart Mark Golvin and JMPM Holdings Ltd Part of Lot 19, Range 3, B.F.C., Part 1, 40R-8832 and Part 1, 40R-10527 (1635 Bayly Street) Building ‘F’Building ‘G’ Building ‘B’Building ‘A’Building ‘C’ Building ‘D’ Building ‘E1’ BAYLY STREET DILLINGHAM ROAD Building ‘E2’ Attachment #4 to Report #PLN 12-21 - 55 -