HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAO 10-02
Ciú¡ o~
REPORT TO THE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Report Number: CAO 10-02
Date: November 26, 2002
From:
Thomas J. Quinn
Chief Administrative Officer
Subject:
Terms of Reference for Pickering's Growth Management Study
Recommendation:
1.
That Pickering Council receive Report Number CAO 10-02 concerning the
Terms of Reference for Pickering's Growth Management Study;
2.
That Pickering Council endorse the draft Terms of Reference for the
Growth Management Study, as outlined in Appendix I to Report Number
CAO 10-02, and authorize staff to issue a Request for Proposals in accordance
with the City's purchasing policy and procedures; and
3.
That the City Clerk forward for information a copy of Report Number CAO 10-02
to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Region of Durham, the
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, and members of the Working Group.
Executive Summary: Draft Terms of Reference for a Growth Management Study
for lands in central Pickering, immediately north of the existing built-up area, have been
prepared for Council's consideration. A Working Group was established to assist staff
in preparing the Terms of Reference, in accordance with Council's direction in
May 2002, and Council's appointments in ,July 2002. The Working Group included
representatives of Council, City staff, the Region of Durham, the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority, the Province of Ontario, other landowners within the Study
Area, and local community groups.
The various backgrounds, experiences and perspectives of the Working Group
members have resulted in an excellent Terms of Reference for this challenging study.
Staff wishes to thank the Working Group members for their time, effort and
thought-provoking comments on the approach to and contents of the draft Terms of
Reference.
Report Number CAO 10-02
November 26, 2002
Terms of Reference - Growth Management Study
Page 2
As set out in Report Number CAO 05-02, the draft Terms of Reference include a
Community Outreach Program to ensure that public involvement and participation will
be an integral part of the Study.
The draft Terms of Reference specify a three-phase study process. The phases
include: Background; Overall Structure Plan; and Neighbourhood Plans. The
Background Phase requires three components to be completed: an environmental
systems assessment; an agricultural community report and collection of other
supporting information.
The draft Terms of Reference also identify 10 principles that express Pickering's
priorities in land use and development decision-making for the Study Area. The
Consulting Team is to follow these principles in undertaking the study.
Finally, the draft Terms of Reference list evaluation criteria for the submissions received
in response to the City's Request for Proposals. Among the criteria are the following:
the Consulting Team's proposed environmental systems assessment methodology;
their understanding of Pickering's principles for growth management and the City's
unique history, context and issues; the quality of their community outreach program;
their creative approach to the study; and their detailed timetable given Council's
eight-month time frame for completion.
Financial Implications: A commitment to fund the Growth Management Study, up to
the cost estimated in Report Number CAO 05-02, has been received from
Mr. Ira T. Kagan, of Kagan Zucker Feldbloom Shastri, Barristers and Solicitors, on
behalf of landowners in the Study Area.
BACKGROUND:
1.0
Workina Group
On May 21,2002, Council received Report Number CAO 05-02 (Revised), which
in part authorized the establishment of a Working Group to assist with the
preparation of draft Terms of Reference for the City's Growth Management
Study. Subsequently, Council's July 29, 2002 Resolution #102/02 appointed the
members to sit on the Working Group. The Working Group comprised
representatives of Council, City staff, the Region of Durham, the Province of
Ontario, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, landowners within the
Study Area, and interested community groups.
Report Number CAO 10-02
November 26,2002
Terms of Reference - Growth Management Study
Page 3
The Working Group met three times (on October 3rd, October 16th, and
November 13th, 2002), to discuss and assist City staff. Although the draft was
prepared with input from the Working Group, not every detail of the language
used was agreed to by all members. Most members of the Group support the
approach and content of the draft Terms of Reference.
Much of the detailed information obtained through the Working Group process
will assist in evaluating the submitted proposals. City staff appreciates the
comments and assistance provided by the Working Group members during the
preparation of the draft Terms of Reference.
2.0
Main Parts of the Draft Terms of Reference
2.1
Purpose
.
As outlined by the Terms of Reference, the purpose of the Growth Management
Study is five-fold:
. to identify the environmental system, including ecological and cultural
attributes;
to identify the appropriate location and configuration of Pickering's
urban/rural boundary;
. to prepare a land use structure for the entire Study Area, and prepare a
development concept for the urban lands;
to develop implementation strategies including phasing, a master
environmental servicing plan, financial tools and strategies, and other
economic, social and land use management strategies; and
to identify neighbourhoods for the urban areas and prepare neighbourhood
plans, policies, detailed environmental master servicing plans, and
development guidelines for neighbourhoods in the first phase.
.
.
2.2
Pickering's Principles
Ten principles expressing the City's priorities for land use and development
decision-making are set out in the draft Terms of Reference. They are:
. maintain environmental integrity;
. respect cultural heritage;
. foster a healthy countryside;
. provide jobs first;
. use of infrastructure economically;
. create a mixed-use community integrated with the existing built-up area
. support a range of transportation choices;
. require quality urban design;
. create a community that can evolve and adapt over time; and
. stage development to be consistent with the principles.
Report Number CAO 10-02
November 26,2002
053
'i
Terms of Reference - Growth Management Study
Page 4
These principles are based on the current policy framework, on-going initiatives
affecting the Study Area, Pickering's role and position in the Greater Toronto
Area, and the latest thinking about land use planning and development.
An elaboration of each principle is provided in the draft Terms of Reference. In
undertaking the Study, the Consulting Team would use these principles as the
basis for researching and analyzing information and making recommendations.
In addition, the criteria for consultant selection require the Consulting Team to
have an understanding of Pickering's principles for growth management.
2.3
The Consulting Team
The draft Terms of Reference provide the evaluation criteria for selecting the
Consulting Team. Pickering is seeking a multi-disciplinary Consulting Team
whose creative approach to study processes and public consultation is matched
with their in-depth understanding of the City's unique history, context and future
opportunities. Pickering is seeking a Consulting Team whose ability to quickly
but appropriately fill strategic gaps in information, synthesize and analyze
relevant information, and formulate salient options and recommendations on the
management of growth in Pickering will reflect the intuitive and experienced team
members.
2.4
Council's Ground Rules
The Study Ground Rules, adopted by Council in May 2002, are incorporated in
the draft Terms of Reference. Three of the original seven ground rules have
been satisfied through the completion of the Terms of Reference. The remaining
ground rules are as follows:
. to recognize the present Official Plan targets for Seaton (i.e. 90,000 people
and 45,OOOjobs);
to recognize the present Official Plan designations for west of Duffins Creek
as agricultural and agricultural easements, and east of Duffins Creek as a
special study area;
. to ensure that the findings and recommendations are based on up-to-date
data and information;
to be completed within approximately eight months of commencement;
.
.
In addition to these ground rules, other study inputs are mentioned, including the
various policy documents that guide planning in Pickering, and other Council
resolutions that affect the Study Area. The draft Terms of Reference state that
these inputs reflect current policy and positions of Council. Further, the
draft Terms of Reference state that only following review and analysis may
the Consulting Team recommend changes for consideration by City Council
and others.
Report Number CAO 10-02
November 26, 2002
Terms of Reference - Growth Management Study
Page 5
2.5
Three Phase Study
The Study is to be undertaken in three phases: Background, Overall Structure
Plan, and Neighbourhood Plans. In addition, the Consulting Team is required to
meet the requirements of the Phase 1 and Phase 2 Municipal Class
Environmental Assessment process for local and regional roads. Work by the
Consulting Team will provide further input to the Durham Transportation Master
Plan study.
In the Background phase, three components relating to the collection of data
and information on topics or issues in support of the Structure Plan are required.
Although the Terms of Reference does not specify a precise work program for
obtaining and verifying environmental information and filling environmental gaps,
the Consulting Team is expected to provide the City with a detailed
'environmental methodology' as part of its proposal submission. A map that
illustrates the result of an assessment of the lands capability to withstand urban
development is to be produced.
In the Overall Structure Plan phase, a number of matters are required to be
described including: the boundary between urban/non-urban lands; non-clevelopable
areas; primary urban and rural land use designations; the transportation system;
a master environmental servicing plan; a development concept and phasing
strategy for the urban lands; neighbourhood boundaries; general strategies; an
overall servicing and infrastructure phasing strategy; an implementation and
financing strategy; and a "rationale report" synthesizing the basis for any
changes recommended to existing policy or Council positions.
The master environmental servicinq plan requirements were prepared by the
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and are included as Appendix A to
the draft Terms of Reference. Appendix A is still being refined, and minor
adjustments may be made subsequent to the deadline for this Report to the
Committee of the Whole.
In the Neighbourhood Plans phase, detailed neighbourhood plans for the first
phase of development are required. Each Neighbourhood Plan will include: the
neighbourhood boundary; the neighbourhood population and employment
targets; the general locations of community facilities; the locations and design of
stormwater ponds; the tertiary road pattern; any neighbourhood-specific
implementation and financing strategies; a detailed Environmental Master
Servicing Plan; and the Development Guidelines (which address detailed urban
design matters).
Report Number CAO 10-02
November 26,2002
Terms of Reference - Growth Management Study
Page 6
2.6
Community Outreach Program
Community consultation will be an integral part of the Growth Management
Study. As part of their proposal, the Consulting Team is required to design and
undertake a Community Outreach Program that elicits input from the Pickering
community, including its multi-cultural population, other groups who are less
inclined to participate in the traditional planning process, and appropriate
First Nations representatives. The Consulting Team is required to prepare a
Community Consultation Report that documents comments and responses to the
views and opinions expressed.
2.7
Study Steering Committee
A Study Steering Committee is to be appointed by Council at a later date. The
Steering Committee will provide strategic direction to the Consulting Team,
including identifying additional issues for which options may be necessary to
generate discussion, identifying when additional public input may be required,
and confirming whether both 'preliminary for discussion' and 'final' reports are
required for all topics. The Consulting Team is required to meet with the
Committee at all critical stages in the Study and to record and distribute notes of
Steering Committee meetings.
2.8
Technical Review & Advisory Committee
A Technical Review & Advisory Committee will also be established as set out in
the draft Terms of Reference. This Committee will provide detailed technical
advice and guidance to the Consulting Team, as the majority of this committee
will be agencies involved in reviewing and comments on planning applications.
The Consulting Team is also required to meet with the Committee at all critical
stages and to record and distribute notes of Advisory Committee meetings.
3.0
Conclusion
It is recommended that Committee and subsequently Council endorse the
Terms of Reference provided as Appendix I to Report Number CAO 10-02, and
authorize staff to issue a Request for Proposals for the Growth Management
Study.
Report Number CAO 10-02
November 26, 2002
Terms of Reference - Growth Management Study
Page 7
APPENDIX:
Draft Terms of Reference for the Growth Management Study
Prepared By:
Approved I Endorsed By:
..
Neil Carr I, IP, RPP
Director, nning & Development
GM\CLR:jf
Copy: Director, Operations & Emergency Services
Director, Corporate Services & Treasurer
Director, Planning & Development
Solicitor for the City
Division Head, Corporate Projects & Policy
Recommended for the consideration of
Pickering City ouncil "
/,/
APPENDIX I TO
TO REPORT NUMBER CAO 10-02
DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCE
(DATED NOVEMBER 26, 2002)
FOR THE
CITY OF PICKERING
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STUDY
A Growth Management Study
for the
Seaton & Agricultural Assembly Lands
in the
City of Pickering
IE
N
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Appendix I to Report Number CAO 10-02
Page 1
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STUDY FOR THE
SEATON & THE AGRICULTURAL ASSEMBLY LANDS
CITY OF PICKERING
1.0
BACKGROUND
1.1
Introduction
The City of Pickering is seeking the professional services of a qualified
Consulting Team to undertake a Growth Management Study for lands within the
City, immediately north of the existing built-up urban area. The Study will be
undertaken in cooperation with the Province of Ontario and other landowners in
the Study Area, and in consultation with the public.
The Terms of Reference for this Study were prepared
assistance of a Working Group. The Working G
from City Council, City staff, external agency s
and the Toronto and Region Conservation Au
other landowners in the Study Area, and local c
Reference were approved by Pickering Counci
Y City staff with the
u ed representatives
Region of Durham
rovince of, Ontario,
roups. The Terms of
2002.
Following a Request for Proposals a
will be appointed by City Council
a Consulting Team
1.2
Study Area
The Study
Seaton land
generally fol
boundary to
Rail line to t
A map show
Pic uncil Resolution #29/02, includes the
r ral mbly lands. The study area boundaries
a 0 the north; Sideline 16 and the Pickering - Ajax
e Lawrence & Hudson (formerly the C.P. Belleville)
d e Pickering - Toronto/Markham boundary to the west.
undary of the Study Area is provided as Attachment #1.
1.3
Public Participation & Consultation
The City of Pickering is committed to public involvement, participation, openness
and accountability in addressing land use issues. The public includes the City's
residents, business-people, landowners, relevant public agencies, and other
interested groups and individuals. In keeping with the City's fundamental
approach to doing business, inclusive and meaningful public involvement must
also be integral to the undertaking of the Growth Management Study.
Section 4.0 of the Terms of Reference identifies the requirement for the
Consulting Team to outline their specific approach to public consultation.
Appendix I to Report Number CAG 10-02
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page 2
1.4
The Consulting Team
Pickering is seeking a Consulting Team whose creative approach to study
processes and public consultation is matched with their in-depth understanding
of the City's unique history, context, and future opportunities. The
Consulting Team's ability to quickly but appropriately fill strategic gaps in
information, synthesize and analyze relevant information, and formulate salient
recommendations on the management of growth in Pickering will reflect the
intuitive and experienced team members with required conceptual, technical and
other skills.
1.5
Consultant Selection
e, but shall not be
The evaluation criteria for selecting a consultan
limited to, the following factors:
. proposed environmental systems assessme
. understanding of Pickering's principles for
. understanding of Pickering's history, c
. understanding of study issues and
. understanding and experienc w'
. the quality of th blic 0
. experience
in the GTI
. the relev
. complian
. the creat
. the advic
. detailed
. cost effe
. the oral
. bid price.
sues;
0
e fi
of ce;
om ing the study;
e vided in the submission;
u , Imetable and work program;
f the proposal;
ion if selected for an interview;
2.0
THE STUDY
2.1
Purpose of the Study
The purpose of the Study is fivefold:
1. to identify the Environmental system, including ecological and cultural
attributes;
2. to identify the appropriate location and configuration of Pickering's urban /
rural boundary;
3. to prepare a land use structure for the entire Study Area, and prepare a
development concept for the urban lands;
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Appendix I to Report Number CAO 10-02
Page 3
4. to develop implementation strategies including phasing, a master
environmental servicing plan, financial tools and strategies, and other
economic, social and land use management strategies; and
5. to identify neighbourhoods for the urban area, and prepare neighbourhood
plans, policies, detailed environmental master servicing plans, and
development guidelines for neighbourhoods in the first phase.
The study will be used to inform:
Pickering (and if necessary, Durham Regional) Official Plan changes;
Pickering and Regional Development Charge studies/by-laws;
Pickering capital and operating financial forecasting and budgeting;
Pickering subdivision / development / site plan condi' ns of approval, and
agreements;
Regional water and sewer designs, capital for
Durham Mobility Study recommendation
forecasting and budgets.
budgets;
sportation capital
2.2
Pickering's Principles for the Growth Mana
The Provincial Policy Statement (P
the Pickering Official Plan e
framework for th Ar
to have rega S
detailed poli
out the desi
City of Pick
I Official Plan and
I se planning policy
tudy, e Consulting Team is
Team is to be guided by the
icial Plans. These policies set
ai, urban and rural systems in the
However, t
Region of D
commence t
Growth Man
i rrently undertaking a review of the PPS; the
ding a review of its Official Plan; and Pickering will
-year review of its Official Plan in 2003. The results of the
Study will form part of the City's Official Plan Review.
Building on t e current policy framework, a review of on-going initiatives affecting
the Study Area, Pickering's role and position in the GT A, and the latest thinking
about land use planning and development, an integrated set of guiding principles
has been prepared.
The principles express the municipal priorities in land use and development
decision-making, and are listed starting on the next page.
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Appendix I to Report Number CAG 10-02
Page 4
1. Maintain Environmental Integrity
. Identify, protect and enhance a healthy ecological system, including the
Area's ecological features and functions, landscapes, habitats, surface
and subsurface water, air, and other resources.
2. Respect Cultural Heritage
. Respect cultural heritage, and protect and integrate important cultural
heritage resources from all time periods into the community, including
significant First Nations sites and rural settlements.
3. Foster a Healthy Countryside
. Encourage a vibrant rural economy inclu
open space uses, and conserve a reso
generations.
e, recreational and
current and future
4. Provide Jobs First
.
a major Employment Area,
ent.
5. Use Infr
future-built infrastructure efficiently and
d Use Community Integrated with the Existing Built-up Area
. Establish a compact, mixed-use urban community that complements
'South Pickering', provides a diversity of housing together with a range of
local services and facilities, and uses innovative approaches.
7. Support A Range of Transportation Choices
. Reduce reliance on the automobile, and facilitate the use of other modes
of travel including walking, cycling, transit, and rail.
Appendix I to Report Number CAD 10-02
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page 5
8. Require Quality Urban Design
. Require attractive, human-scale development and establish high quality
public spaces that foster interaction and a sense of place.
9. Create a Community That can Evolve and Adapt Over Time
. Establish a development pattern that is flexible and can evolve over time
to meet the diverse and changing needs of the area's people and the
market place.
10. Stage Development to be Consistent with the Principles
. Stage development in a logical and appropriate manner, consistent with
the principles.
2.3
Ground Rules from Report to Council CAO 05-02 (Revised)
City Council, in initiating this Growth Management Study, established seven (7)
ground rules. Three of the original ground rules have been satisfied through the
completion of this terms of reference. The remaining ground rules are:
1. The Study is to recognize the present attic'
(Le., 90,000 people and 45,000 jobs).
targets for Seaton
2. The Study is to recognize the present 0
Duffins Creek as agricultural and agric
Duffins Creek as a special study area.
esignations west of
ents, and east of
on up-to-date data
RCA, University of
pproximately eight months of
These grou 9 Provincial and Official Plan policies referenced
in section 2 other "inputs" to the Study described below in
section 2.4, e of current policy and positions of Pickering Council
and others. ss, through the Study, all lands within the Study Area are
to be revi th respect to their features, functions, constraints and
opportunitie e Consulting Team, following review and analysis of information
as required 0 fulfill these Terms of Reference, may recommend changes to the
current conditions. As set out in section 3.4, the Consulting Team shall provide a
rationale for any such changes recommended.
Appendix I to Report Number CAO 10-02
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page 6
2.4
Council Resolutions
2.5
3.0
3.1
3.2
Several Council resolutions and positions on transportation issues affecting the
Study Area should be considered input to the Study. They are paraphrased as
follows:
. That the extension of Dixie Road northerly across West Duffins Creek not be
supported, and that the existing Dixie Road be designated as a
Type C arterial, not a Type B arterial;
. That the extension of the east-west arterial into Markham that crosses West
Duffins Creek south of Whitevale, be eliminated; and
. That the interchange locations on Highway 407 not be located at North Road
and Sideline 22.
WORK TO
Study Funding and Administration
The City is retaining the Consulting Team to un
Study. The funding for the Study will be fr;
Study Area. Major landowners include
owner of lands on the east side of We
administer the funds, and make all
meets the Terms 0 eferen
invoices.
rowth Management
ndowners within the
Ontario (the primary
thers. The City will
er completed work
rk, and payment of
Foundation
The multi-di
section 2.2.
to the Study
. the existi lanning policy framework;
. the emerging policies from on-going reviews of policy document;
. direct and indirect influences of initiatives of others agencies and levels of
government;
. the ground rules set out in section 2.3;
. Council resolutions / positions set out in section 2.4.
0 ulting Team is to follow the principles set out in
n, the Consulting Team is to use the following as the inputs
Level of Detail
The Consulting Team shall ensure the level of detail provided in the Study is
sufficient to address the goal, purposes, deliverables and intended uses of the
Study, as set out in the Terms of Reference.
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Appendix I to Report Number CAG 10-02
Page 7
lands within the Study Area have been subject to numerous planning initiatives
and much 'study' over the last 30 years. Consequently, a vast array of data is
available; however, the data has been gathered and docu ented for a variety of
purposes, by a number of government and non- ent organizations, in
different decades, in different forms, and for. rts or all of the
Study Area.
identify the required
e study components;
ta; identify existing
studies or fieldwork
es.
Accordingly, it is the Consulting Team's respo
type, level and form of information necessary
review and assess availability and ad
data gaps or flaws in existing data; a
to provide required information
The City ope
is responsi
Similarly, t
Regional Ro
to existing
Regional re
and roads.
r nt em. The Region of Durham
not and sanitary sewer services.
po the provision of a network of
in proposed new roads, and modifications
ted t appropriate consultation will occur with
cting the provision and financing of water, sewer
The Consult shall ensure that the level of detail meets the requirements
of Phase 1 roblem) and Phase 2 (alternatives) of the Class Environmental
Assessment Act for local and regional roads, and that notices about the
Growth Management Study include appropriate references to this.
3.3
Growth Management Study -- Phase One: Background
The Study shall be undertaken in three phases: Background; Structure Plan; and
Neighbourhood Plans.
3.3.1 Backqround -- Component A: Environmental Systems Assessment
The Consulting Team shall define and map the Environmental System within and
surrounding the Study Area.
The Consulting Team shall also assess the Environmental System within the
Study Area for its capacity to withstand urban development, and make
recommendations respecting land use based on the findings.
In assessing the Environmental System, the Consulting Team may identify lands
such as: areas where environmental protection is appropriate and no urban
development or other land uses shall take place; areas where urban
development or other land uses can take place but environmental functions must
be maintained or enhanced; and areas where development and other land uses
can proceed subject to normal policy requirements and approval processes.
Appendix I to Report Number CAO 10-02
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page 8
3.3.2 Backqround -- Component B: Aqricultural Community Assessment
The Consulting Team shall review and report on the current agricultural
community, including physical, social and economic attributes. In addition, the
Consulting Team shall assess and recommend future viable opportunities,
priorities, and strategies for agriculture within the Study Area.
3.3.3 Backqround -- Component C: Other Backqround & Analysis
3.4
Growth Management Study Phase Two: eve
on topics or issues in
The Consulting Team shall prepare background informati
support of the Structure Plan required by section 3
Plan
The Consulting Team shall prepare an Overall
be for all the lands within the study
illustrating and/or describing a numbe
n. This Plan is to
and non-urban)
. The boundary
. The open
non-dev
. Primary
. The tran
compon
. The mas
for the u
. A develo cept and phasing strategy for the urban lands;
. Neighbo oundaries based on the development concept;
. General gies for where additional policy or other guidance is required for
agricultu , community services and facilities, cultural heritage, economic
development, environmental protection and enhancement, housing, the
interface between historic hamlets and new urban development, the interface
between agricultural land and new urban development, water and sanitary
sewer infrastructure, urban design, implementation and financing;
. An overall servicing and infrastructure phasing strategy, addressing both
municipal and regional facilities and services.
. An implementation and financing strategy, addressing both municipal and
Regional responsibilities.
. A "rationale report" synthesizing the basis for any changes recommended to
existing policy or Council positions.
include the
ns;
oad, cycling, pedestrian, transit and rail
servicing plan (including water management plan)
The Consulting Team shall prepare options for significant matters being reviewed
in the second phase. In preparing their work program, the Consulting Team shall
identify where options are to be provided. The Study Steering Committee (see
section 6.2) may provide further direction during the course of the Study on
where options may be required.
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Appendix I to Report Number CAO 10-02
Page 9
3.5
Growth Management Study Phase Three: Detailed Neighbourhood Plans,
EMSP & Development Guidelines
The Consulting Team shall prepare Neighbourhood Plans for the
neighbourhoods in the first phase of development, as agreed to by the City.
Each Neighbourhood Plan would illustrate and/or describe:
. The neighbourhood boundary;
. Neighbourhood population and employment targets;
. The general location of community facilities;
. The location, size and preliminary design of stormwat
. The tertiary road pattern and location of major
. Neighbourhood-specific implementation a
where warranted;
. Be supported by a detailed Environmental M
. Be supported by Development Guidelines,
urban design strategies for the Neig
onds;
ails, etc.;
strategies,
The Consulting Team shall pre~
in the third phase re
identify wher e
section 6.2) e
where optio
ica ers being reviewed
, th onsulting Team shall
dy Steering Committee (see
the course of the Study on
4.0
COMMUNIT
Community
managemen
and test opti
n an integral part of undertaking the growth
ommunity consultation provides an opportunity to explore
he public, agencies and others.
The Consul g Team shall design and undertake an effective and inclusive
Community Outreach Program. The Program is to obtain comments from and
exchange information with members of the community, on an on-going basis
during the Study.
The Consulting Team shall describe how the Community Outreach Program will
obtain the views of Pickering's multi-cultural population, other groups who are
less inclined to participate in traditional planning processes, and appropriate
First Nations representatives. The Consulting Team should recommend how
they would select (a) representative(s) to speak for interests such as
First Nations peoples.
The Study Steering Committee will make the final selection on
(a) representative(s) to speak for interests such as First Nations peoples. The
Committee may also provide guidance to the Consulting Team during the course
of the Study on when additional public input may be required.
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Appendix I to Report Number CAO 10-02
Page 10
The Consulting Team shall prepare a Community Consultation Report
documenting comments, and responses, to the views and opinions expressed.
5.0
DELIVERABLES
5.1
Deliverables
For the Reports listed below, it is anticipated that mo t will require both a
"Preliminary for Discussion" and a "Final" Report. The St Steering Committee
may give direction during the course of the Stu ther any particular
report does not require a preliminary and final ve
and mapping;
1. A Environmental Systems Analysis Report, i
2. An Agricultural Community Assessment Re
3. An Overall Structure Plan Report;
4. A Background Report or Re
Plan Reports)'
5. An Urb
Concept,
part of th
6. Servicin
Structur
e Overall Structure
ort, including Development
rood Boundaries (which may be
orts (which may be part of the Overall
7. An Urb as Environmental Servicing Plan, including water
manage see Appendix A); ,
8. Impleme & Financing Strategy Report (which may be part of the
Overall cture Plan Report);
9. Neighbourhood Report(s) for the first phase on development, which reports
include the Neighbourhood Plans, detailed Neighbourhood EMSPs (see
Appendix A) and Development Guidelines;
10. A Rationale Report synthesizing the basis for any proposed changes to
current policy and positions;
11. Public & Agency Consultation Report.
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Appendix I to Report Number CAG 10-02
Page 11
The Consult
of any sub-c
For deliverables listed above, the Consulting Team shall forward to the City of
Pickering the following:
. For each "Preliminary" Report: 25 draft copies;
read copy of the final version; one copy of t
compatible with Microsoft Word 2000 (all
AutoCad.dwg or .dxf format);
. For each "Final" or other Report: 25 dr
camera read copy of the final version; one
format compatible with Microsoft W
AutoCad.dwg or .dxf format).
f I copies; one camera
'on in digital format
to be provided in
00 final copies; one
inal version in digital
is to be provided in
r/his team's work, and the work
6.0
STUDY MA
6.1
General
The City of g Planning & Development Department will manage the
study. The ning & Development Department, through the Study Steering
Committee III be responsible for supervising the study work to ensure that it is
carried out in accordance with the Terms of Reference and to the satisfaction of
the City of Pickering. The Department, through the Study Steering Committee,
shall monitor study progress, liaise with the Consultant, and exercise budgetary
control and revisions to the Terms of Reference subject to Council approval. The
Department shall also be responsible for the circulation of study products,
notices, and approval of Consultant liaison with the public and other agencies.
6.2
Study Steering Committee
A Study Steering Committee will be established to provide strategic direction to
the Consulting Team, including additional issues for which options may be
necessary to generate discussion, when additional public input may be required,
and whether preliminary and final reports are required in some instances. The
Consulting Team shall meet with the Committee at all critical stages in the Study.
The Consulting Team shall be responsible for recording, typing and distributing
notes of Steering Committee meetings.
6.3
Technical Review & Advisory Committee
A Technical Review & Advisory Committee will be established to provide advice
and guidance to the Consulting Team. The Consulting Team shall meet with the
Committee at all critical stages in the Study. The Consulting Team shall be
responsible for recording, typing and distributing notes of Advisory Committee
meetings.
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Appendix I to Report Number CAG 10-02
Page 12
7.0
DIRECTIONS TO BIDDER
The City of Pickering reserves the right to limit the number of detailed
submissions to be received for the study proposal. This invitation for detailed
submissions mayor may not be the result of a short-listing process and is at the
discretion of the City of Pickering.
7.1
Submissions
Submissions for this proposal shall be physically received by the City of
Pickering, Corporate Services Department, Supply & Services Division, by an
appointed date and time. Late submission will not be ccepted and will be
returned unopened. All submissions shall be prepa a cost to the City.
7.2
Errors and Omissions
consultant feels it
ecified, the cost for
The lowest or any bid shall not be necessarily a
is advisable to do additional work, or delete s
these revisions should be specified.
It shall be und
include spec' .
each phase
needed to c
error or misi
the respons
study.
0 a ile the Terms of Reference
s s omplete study is required for
n i the Terms of Reference, but
sha ed as if specified. Any omission or
Te Reference shall not relieve the bidder of
e Terms of Reference and provide a complete
7.3
Bid and Su
Submissions should contain sufficient information for evaluation and selection.
Bidders may be required to provide additional information or clarification on the
contents of their submission. From the submissions, the City shall select a
short-list of Consulting Teams to present an overview of their proposal and
attend an interview with the selection panel.
Submissions must include the following information:
(i)
An Executive Summary of the Proposal
Appendix I to Report Number CAG 10-02
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page 13
(ii)
Consulting Team Details
The names, qualifications, relevant experience, and proposed roles and
responsibilities of the members of the Consulting Team shall be provided. A brief
history of the companies, and details of the support facilities available and
proposed for use on this project should also be provided. Past projects that are
similar in nature, and the specific involvement of key personnel proposed in this
project should be listed. References for recent projects of a similar nature should
also be provided.
The City of Pickering has to approve any changes or substitution of key
personnel for the study.
(B)
Proposed Work Program and Timetable
This section shall contain a detailed work pro
nature and detailed scope of the Study, stages
for consultation, the Study products and deliver
be undertaken, the technical details of e
milestones, project timetable, timin
Study Steering Committee, timin
Technical Review and Adviso
tudy, outlining the
ns will be generated
ription of the tasks to
be provided, project
eetings with the
eetings with the
The City 0
approximate
retained.
anagement Study will take
e time the Consulting Team is
(iv)
This section
down by ph
addition, th
public mee
disburseme
e ummary of the following: total project cost, broken
ponents, and major tasks, as agreed to by the City. In
personnel cost, per diem, the cost to attend an additional
, or additional meeting of Council (if requested), mileage,
s, contingencies and taxes shall be identified.
Payment will only be made when all the requirements of each major task are
fulfilled to the satisfaction to the City of Pickering. Accordingly, all invoicing must
indicate precisely tasks for which work has been completed, and remaining
percentage of task to be done.
7.4
Enquiries
Any enquiries regarding these Terms of Reference should be directed either to
Ms. Catherine Rose, Manager, Policy, (905-420-4660, ext. 2038) or
Ms. Vera Felgemacher, Manager, Supply & Services (905-420-4616) at the
City of Pickering.
Appendix I to Report Number GAG 10-02
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page 14
1.5
Changes
Verbal clarification should not be interpreted to change the intent of the Terms of
Reference. Any revisions to these Terms of Reference shall be issued as an
addendum, or at a meeting of all bidders.
8.0
CONSULTANT SELECTION
Appendix B contai
e
the criteria set out in
Criteria for the selection of the Consultant will be based
section 1.5 of the Terms of Reference.
APPENDIX A
Appendix A contains the requirements for a m
urban area & secondary plan area, as
environmental master servicing plans 0
subdivision level in the fir ase of I
servicing plan for an
nts for a detailed
I & draft plan of
APPENDIX B
ces available to the Consulting Team.
G mglg rowthmanagem entld raft#4terrnsofref doc
Nov, 26/02
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page A - 1
Appendix A
MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICING PLAN REQUIREMENTS
For: (A) Urban Areas & Secondary Plan Approval
(B) Neighbourhood & Draft Plan Approval
Draft Terms of Reference for MESP's for Urban Area & Secondary Plan
Approval
The Consulting Team should pre-consult with the Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA) prior to commencing work.
(A)
Phase 1 - ExistinG Conditions Reporl (additional detail is to be added by the TRCA
about this Phase 1 reporl)
. must complete an existing conditions assessment of the Study Area;
. should establish development limits criteria (Le., top of bank, floodlines, limit of
features, buffers);
. should set the constraints of the Study Area (Le., no touc Z s, areas of important
features - wetlands, woodlots, recharge/discharge rcourses, aquifer
vulnerability etc.);
. the constraints of the area must be put onto an over
. must speak to how the areas of important feat
(Le., drainage area to wetlands kept the same etc.
Once Phase 1 has
protected
This Phase 1 report must be reviewed and
before Phase 2 can be initiated.
gn off from TRCA
nt area has been established:
Stormwater
. must evaluate st
(Le., pond locati
. the alternative
ahead with the p
nd come up with a preferred stormwater strategy
be discussed with TRCA before going
Stormwater Pond C ria:
. water quality - level 1
. flood flow:
0 dependent on subcatchment (Whitevale, Urfe, Ganatsekiagon Creeks have
2-100 year post to pre-control, East and West Duffins Creek no quantity control
required from Aquafor 2002 report);
0 must update the post-development model from the hydrology update completed
by Aquafor in 2002 to include proposed development area (Le., the future Official
Plan scenario from the 2002 update did not include urban areas to Highway 7 or
the Agriculture Assembly lands as urban);
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page A - 2
Appendix A
0 must look at water quantity criteria set out in the 2002 report after new analysis is
complete to determine if it is still valid;
0 must complete a regional storm analysis to determine if regional control is
required;
. frequent flow:
0 must be completed on a subwatershed basis;
0 identify subwatershed and limits of continuous
have to be completed in support of draft plan ap
Future Study Requi
. should set out requirements are for future studies (i.e., MESP's in support
of draft plan - plain mapping using TRCA standards, continuous simulation
erosion analysis sing TRCA standards).
osion studies that
Hydrogeology
. water balance:
0 must demonstrate that the exist'
(i.e., infiltration map) is maintain
0 the post-develop cen
Clarifica mus
agriculture a
0 must compa
to determine
. source protectio
0 must protect
ra fined by TRCA
de ent;
er B ance 2002 report by
areas of this study (i.e., the
d to be undeveloped);
ith the results of the new analysis
s outlined in the YPD project;
(B)
Draft Terms of Reference for MESP's for Neighbourhood level & Draft Plan
Approval
The Consulting Team should pre-consult with the Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA) prior to commencing work.
Stormwater Pond Criteria
. water quality - level 1, refine permanent pool volume based on specific draft plan
details (Le., imperviousness based on lot layouts etc.)
. flood flow - refine hydrology model to specific draft plan details and refine volumes
and release rates for pond design
. frequent flow - complete a continuous simulation erosion analysis on a
subwatershed basis using the following criteria:
0 Phase 1: Characterization: (to be undertaken by a qualified fluvial
geomorphologist)
1. Characterize the existing channel form to define representative reaches and
classify the stability of the active channel (i.e., determine the most sensitive
reaches );
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page A - 3
Appendix A
2. Establish the erosion thresholds for the entire study area based on field
measurements (Le., determine critical discharge, velocity and depth of
flow for the most sensitive reaches based on both bed and bank
assessment - the most critical values should be used);
0 Phase 2: Erosion Analysis Modellinq
1. Establish a continuous simulation model using Qualhymo version 2.2. The
modelling will include converting the existing watersh hydrology model to
Qualhymo to assess the instream erosion pote' e continuous model
should have a minimum of 6 years of hourly d rably this data set
of 6 years should include a wet year, a dry ye rage year);
2. Run the existing conditions scenario, which w targets;.
3. Run the future scenario (which would incl osed developments)
with and without SWM controls (Le., al to be modelled) to
determine the necessary storage s to maintain the
existing erosion potential;
4. Perform a sensiti' analys'
thresholds st
facilities'
stormwat
facility wil
25° lation in the erosion
n he stormwater management
e s). If the design of the
Be sensitive, then the size of the
t for this sensitivity.
. the field work 0
(a study for the
Ganatsekiagon
. this study shoul
study area of t
sufficient and if f
s
h
ee ;
wed to determine if the development area is within the
rt by Parish Geomorphic and whether the information is
er work is required;
will be completed by Parish Geomorphic in 2003
est Duffins (south of Taunton Road), Whitevale,
. stormwater facility:
0 size, type (Le., wetland or wet pond), exact location should be determined for
each facility to set the block size;
0 need a plan of each facility which outlines pond grading, side slopes, inlet and
outlet inverts, preliminary road grades, 3: 1 length to width ratio as well as a
cross-section through each facility to ensure that the block size is sufficient;
Hydrogeology (to be finalized by TRCA's hydrogeologist)
. water balance:
0 must verify the soil type (Le., by literature review and site visits);
0 must complete at least 3 percolation (Le., Guelph permeameter etc.) tests for
each soil type to determine the infiltration capacity of the soil on the site and how
it compares to the value from the infiltration map and the Clarifica report;
0 update post-development water balance scenario on actual draft plan details;
0 alternative measures for SWM measure to demonstrate how this recharge is
being met (Le., conceptual designs and preliminary numbers are required to set
any necessary block sizes etc.);
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page A - 4
Appendix A
. source protection:
0 must demonstrate how protection of aquifer vulnerability will be incorporated into
the draft plan;
Floodplain Mapping
. must complete digital floodplain mapping to TRCA stan
. new base mapping will be required for areas that c
(Le., Whitevale, Urfe, Ganatsekiagon Creeks) to TR
. any new floodplain mapping must tie into existing m
ot have floodlines
Implementation Strategy
. must outline the participating and non-pa .
. must establish a sediment control pi
lands are going to be iced'
fences, mud mats, 10
. if the stormwate 0
facilities must h
volume based 0
at shows how the
, cut-off swales, silt
n ction phase, then temporary
25 m3/ha and a permanent pool
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page B-1
Appendix B
SELECTED RESOURCES AVAILABLE
Air Photography - digital (taken in 2000)
Durham Regional Official Plan
Eyles, N., Boyce, J. and Gerber R. Hydrogeological Study of the North Pickering
Development Corporation Lands and Duffins Creek Watershed. Prepared' for the
North Pickering Development Corporation. 1997.
HBT AGRA Ltd. Seaton Lands as a Natural Ecosystem. Report to the Seaton Interim
Planning Team. 1994.
Jones M, and Guy, M. Seaton Lands Stream Assessment: Aquatic Habitat and Fisheries.
Prepared for the North Pickering Development. 1997. [CD ROM available from TRCA]
Ministry of Municipal Affairs.
Planning. Toronto: 1991.
Seaton:
A Strategy for
Responsible
Ontario Form Collaborative (John van Nostrand Assoc'
Milus Bollenberghe Topps Watchorn). A Plan for Seaton.
Toronto: 1995.
mpson Architects;
g + Design Exercise.
Pickering, City of. Pickering Rural Study, Final R
Pickering, City of. Recreation, Parks
Strategic Plan Report, Draf . I Rep
ter Plan Update:
Pickering, City of.
Technical Report, Dr
Master Plan Update:
Pickering, City of. Pi
. September, 2000.
Pickering, City of.
September 2000.
ment to the Pickering Official Plan. Edition 3,
Rouge Park Alliance.
orth Management Plan, April 2002.
Rouge Park Alliance.
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. Duffins Creek State of the Watershed Report.
Toronto: June 2002.
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. A Management Plan for the Duffins Creek and
Carruthers Creek Watersheds. The Report of the Duffins Creek & Carruthers Creek Joint
Task Force Report. Toronto: [(draft - June 2002].
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page B-2
Appendix B
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Boyce, J., and Eyles, N. Architectural Element
Analysis Applied to Glacial Deposits: Internal Geometry of a Late Pleistocene Till Sheet,
Ontario Canada. Geological Society of America. Bulletin, v. 112, pp. 98-118.
A Biological Survey of North Pickering Project Site & Toronto II Airport Site, by
F.A. Walden & Martin, March 1974.
A Community for the 1990's and Beyond, Package by Ministry of Housing, 1990.
A Hydrologic Model for Environmental Impact Assessment. t
Petticoat & Duffins Watersheds, Shelly I. Solomon Assoc.,
ouge, Little Rouge,
A Plan for Seaton, Summary, Ontario Form Collaborative.
Analysis of Financial Impact of North Pickering on the
Undertaken by the Staff of Regional Municipali f
September 1977.
rham - A Joint Study
h Pickering Project,
Architectural Evaluation of
Projects Sites by Pro'
April 1974, Second E ..
Cedarwood Develo
RV. Anderson Assoc
eport on Municipal Services by
Commissioner's Re
mmittee, Report No. 81-174, July 14,1981.
Community Popula
Final Report, Avrum
ou ng Study for the Proposed Community of Seaton,
If, Toronto, April, 1991.
North Pickering P t - Background Paper No.5 - Urban Systems Analysis:
A Literature Review, ecember 1974.
North Pickering Project - Background Paper No.6 - Urban Systems Analysis:
Aggregate Analysis of Regional and Lakeshore Corridor Patterns, December 1974.
North Pickering Project - Background Paper No.7 - Urban Systems Analysis:
Synthesis and Implications for North Pickering, December 1974.
North Pickering Project - Background Paper No.9 - Industrial Location Patterns,
December 1974.
North Pickering Project - Background Paper No.1 0 - Location & Site Requirements of
Secondary Industry, January 1975.
North Pickering Project - Background Paper No. 11 - Input/Output Study for Industrial
Linkage Requirements, January 1975.
North Pickering Project - Background Paper No. 12 - The Identification of Most Probable
Industries, January 1975.
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page B-3
Appendix B
Discussion Paper No.1: Initial Assumptions & Issues North Pickering Community
Development Team, Ministry of Treasury, Economics & Intergovernmental Affairs,
Plantown Consultants, September 1973.
Finch Avenue Arterial Road Feasibility Study - Technical Report prepared by McCormick,
Rankin Consulting Engineers for the North Pickering Development Corporation, March, 1977.
Hydrogeological Study of the North Pickering Development Corporation Lands and the
Duffins Creek Watershed, Final Report, August 1997.
Planning
ickering
Report,
Interim Report Transportation
Plantown Consultants, June 1974.
Lowry Model Analysis of North
Ministry of Housing, December 1974.
Ministry of Housing, Ontario Land Corpora'
Primary Sanitary Drainage System for
Marshall Macklin Monaghan Li ited, Ma
ering Study for a
unity, Volume 1,
North Pickering Co
Urbanization on the
ater Resources Impacts of
Li Ited, March 1975.
North Pickering C
Initial Assumptions a
ect - Public Discussion Paper No. I:
tants Limited, September 1973.
North Pickering De
Study - Arterial Ro
Totten Sims Hubicki
0 ation - Route Feasibility & Functional Planning
- U an Stage One Development North Pickering Project,
, February 1978.
North Pickering Pro - A Background Paper - Commuting Analyses by B.C. Hutchison,
P. Eng, April 1974 Revised March 1975.
North Pickering Project - A Background Paper - Identification of Manufacturing Growth
Industries, undated, Received January 1975.
North Pickering Project - A Background Report - Planning for Urban Goods Movement,
February 1975.
North Pickering Project - A New Community, Ministry of Housing Package, undated.
North Pickering Project - Background Paper No.1 - Technical Information Relating to
Social Programs and Facilities in North Pickering, March 1975.
North Pickering Project - Background Paper No.2 - Community Design New Towns
Reviewed, Plantown Consultants, June 1974.
North Pickering Project - Background Paper No.4 - The "Market" Profiles - Some First
Impressions, December 1974.
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page B - 4
Appendix B
North Pickering Project - Background Paper No. 13 - Study of the Potential Future
Distribution of Service Industries in the Toronto Region, by Peat, Marwick and Partners and
IBI Group, Apri/1975.
North Pickering Project - Background Paper No. 14 - Urban Employment for
North Pickering, April 1975.
North Pickering Project - Background Paper No. 15 - Income and Occupation Profiles for
North Pickering, April 1975.
North Pickering Project - Background Paper No. 16 - A LivelWork Community, July 1975,
Ministry of Housing.
People, Dwellings,
-Relationships, by
North Pickering Project - Community Design Backgroun
Density and Community Form - a Preliminary Study
Plantown Consultants Limited, June 1974.
North Pickering Project - Community Design Backgr
Discussion Papers on Housing by Plantown Consu
- A Compendium of
1974.
North Pickering Project - Community Design
Shopping and Community Form by Plan
liminary Review of
1974.
North Pickering Proj
Guidelines by Planto
per 8 - Open Space Planning
North Pickering Pro
the North Pickering
ent Opportunities & Constraints within
Housing.
North Pickering Pr
Analysis by Plantow
ro ntal Planning - An Approach to Environmental
Li ¡ted, October 1974.
North Pickering P
Plantown Consultant
Interim Report 1 - Towards a Basis for the Plan by
ed, October 1974.
North Pickering Project - Interim Report 2 - Evaluation of Phase B Modified Concept
Plans by Plantown Consultants Limited, February 1975.
North Pickering Project -Interim Report on Social Development - Volume One: Summary
of Background Studies by Plantown Consultants Limited, June 1974.
North Pickering Project - Interim Report on Social Development - Volume Two: Inventory
of Information by Plantown Consultants Limited, June 1974.
North Pickering Project - Retail Market Study prepared for Ontario Land Corporation,
Ministry of Housing by Larry Smith & Associates Ltd., February 1979.
North Pickering Project - Summary of Recommended Plan, August 1975.
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page B - 5
Appendix B
North Pickering Project. Transit Studies (A Background Report), by De Leuw Cather,
Canada Ltd., Consulting Engineers and Planners, April 1975.
North Pickering Seaton Advisory Committee, (blue binder) September 1993 to March 1994,
North Pickering Seaton Advisory Committee, March 1994 to July 1994.
North Pickering Seaton Advisory Committee, July 1994 to March 1995.
North Pickering Seaton Advisory Committee, March 1995 to August
Parsons Ltd., 1985.
Ontario land Corp. - Pickering Open Space Study Vol. I,
Ontario land Corp. - Pickering Open Space Study Vol. II
n Parsons Ltd., 1985.
Planning the Seaton Community, Policy Recomm
Practice, Dr. John Hitchcock, December 14, 1990
Route Feasibility & Functioning Planni
Brock West Sanitary land' 'fe, To
oads - Vicinity of
1978.
S.D.C. Development
Stolp, October 1989.
Seaton Advisory Co
Seaton Advisory Re
Seaton Community
by C.N. Watson And
ip inancial Impact Analysis for the Town of Pickering
td., Economists, April 1989.
Seaton Community unicipal Financial Impact Analysis for the Town of Pickering,
C.N. Watson and Ass lates Ltd. Economists, October, 1988.
Seaton Community Plan, Municipal Financial Impact Analysis for the Town of Pickering,
C.N. Watson and Associates Ltd. Economists, February, 1989.
Seaton Community Transportation Project, External Road Assessment, Marshall Macklin
Monaghan, December 1988.
Seaton Design Competition, Technical Review of Final Submissions, November 1994.
Seaton Financial Impact Study. Background Report on the Sanitary Sewage and Water
Requirements for the Seaton Development, by Totten Sims Hubicki Associates,
February 1990.
Seaton Financial Impact Study, by Totten Sims Hubicki & Clayton Research Associates Ltd.,
December 1990.
Seaton Handbook, Seaton Team Dunker.
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page B - 6
Appendix B
Seaton in The Town of Pickering. Supporting Documentation for Official Plan
Amendment, Regional Municipality of Durham by Ontario Land Corporation, undated.
Seaton in The Town of Pickering - Summary Supporting Documentation for Official Plan
Amendment, Regional Municipality of Durham by Ontario Land Corporation, undated.
Seaton lands as a Natural Ecosystem, HBT AGRA Limited, April, 1994.
Seaton lands as a Natural Ecosystem, HBT Agra Limited, February, 1994.
Seaton lands as a Natural Ecosystem, (A Proposal) HBT AGRA Limited, June 23, 1993.
The Seaton lands as a Natural Ecosystem Study (A Proposal) sub ¡tted to the Ministry of
Housing, June 1993.
, Seaton Advisory
Seaton Planning & Design Exercise, Phase Three
Committee, July 15, 1994.
Seaton The Form of its History, A Socio-Economic Hist
North Pickering Planning Area, Ministry of Housing.
Seaton Working Sessions on Living wit
Economics/Finance Summary Report, 0
iety and Culture
ning Report.
Seaton, Phase Thr
November 3, 1994.
Interim
Planning Team,
Study to Assess the
by Giffels Associates
ommunity on the Town of Pickering
Study to Assess th
Education and th
Giffels ssociates Limi
P f the Seaton Community on the Durham Board of
Re on Roman Catholic Separate School Board by
ber 1979.
The North Pickeri
Irene Bowman, June
rchaeology Report # 4, by Victor Konrad, William Ross,
4.
The North Pickering Project - A First Financial Evaluation of the Recommended Plan for
North Pickering, September 1975.
The North Pickering Project - Environmental Consultants - Environmental Management
Constraints & Opportunities within North Pickering Project Site, W.M,C. Wilson, N.P.P.
The North Pickering Project - Services, Utilities, & Communications Interim Report,
October 1974, Plantown Consultants.
Seaton Impact Study. Greater Toronto area Assessment DRAFT by Totten Sims Hubicki
Associates (1981) Limited for the Town of Pickering, July, 1990.
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page B - 7
Appendix B
North Pickering (Seaton) Lands - City of Pickering:
Sernas & Associates; June 2002.
Development Analysis; by
North Pickering Preliminary Structural Plan - Figure 1; by Malone Given Parsons Ltd.; not
dated; received September 26, 2002. '
Books About Local History - A List of Books Available in the Pickering Libraries pertaining to
Local History.
Heritage Pickering - Hwy. 407 Corridor Study, by Barn Owl Designs.
Seaton Cultural Heritage Resources Assessment, Summary Report, Volume I, by
Hough Stansbury Woodland Naylor Dance Limited-Prime Consultants, July 1994.
Seaton Cultural Heritage Resources Assessment, Technical Appendix, by Hough Stansbury
Woodland Naylor Dance Limited-Prime Consultants, July 1994 Volume II.
Seaton Cultural Heritage Resources Assessment, Confidential Appendix, by
Hough Stansbury Woodland Naylor Dance Limited-Prime Consultants, July 1994 Volume B.
The 1997 Stage 1-3, Archaeological Assessment of the Lamoreaux and Duffin Heights
Neighbourhoods, Town of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham, Ontario,
D.R. Poulton & Associates (grey binder).
The Archaeological Facility Master Plan Study of the Northeast
Mayer, Pihl, Poulton and Associates and Submitted to The City c
dy Area, prepared by
rough, February 1989.
The Hamlet of Whitevale Heritage Conservation Dist
prepared by The Town of Pickering, August 1989.
ckground Report,
The Hamlet of Whitevale Heritage Conservation Dis ric
by The Town of Pickering, June 1990.
The Pickering Story, 1961 reprinted 1995
Town of Pickering - I
Whitevale Heritage
A Conceptual Plan f
Pickering, Markham
the Federal & Provincial Public Lands in
Duffin Rouge Agric
Greater Toronto Are
ultural Economic Impact Study, November 19, 1999.
Historical Researc Document, Seaton Surplus Agricultural Land, Duffin Rouge
Agricultural Preserve Heritage Pickering, Received August 28, 1997.
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page B - 8
Appendix B
State of the Resources for the Duffin-Rouge Agricultural Preserve by loW. Schut and
E. A. Wilson, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, March 1994.
Environmental Inventories of Five Airports Sites Southern Ontario Airport Study,
Gartner Lee, Professional Services in Environmental Management.
land Use in the Vicinity of Airports, Seventh Edition, March 1989 (includes May 1996
amendment).
A Biological Survey of the North Pickering Project Site and Toronto II Airport Site, by
F.A. Walden, 1974.
Environmentally Significant Areas Study, 1996 Update by the Metropolitan Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority.
Environmentally Significant Areas Study, by the Metropolita
Conservation Authority, 1982.
GTA Population and Employment Projections Final
January 2000.
ic Projections Inc.,
Population, Housing and Employment in the GTA -
August 1998.
k, by Greg Lampert,
Projection Methodology Guideline, A
Employment and Relate d
July 19,1995.
n, Housing Need,
ntario, date stamped
The Outlook for P
The Office for the Gr
Lybrand Consulting G
e GTA - Technical Appendices,
, emson Consulting Ltd., The Coopers &
The Outlook for Pop
Area, August 1993, H
ment in The GTA, The Office for the Greater Toronto
td., The Coopers & Lybrand Consulting Group.
Forests of Pickerin
May 1996, Ministry of
icant Woodlands in the Town of Pickering, Draft Report,
al Resources.
Ground-Water Resources of the Duffins Creek-Rouge River Drainage Basins, by the
Ministry of the Environment, Water Resources Branch, 1977.
North Ajax/Pickering - Cumulative Impact Study - Report on Phase 2 & 3: Examination of
Existing Environmental Conditions & Evaluation of Cumulative Impacts, Bird & Hale Ltd,
Jagger Hims Ltd, June 12, 1992.
Rouge-Duffins Draft Natural Heritage System, by Geomatics International Inc., March 1997.
Rouge Park Management Plan, May 1994.
City of Pickering Growth Management Study
Draft Terms of Reference - November 26,2002
Page B - 9
Appendix B
Rouge Park Neighbourhood Study, Phase 2 Report, December 1O, 1999.
Rouge Park Vegetation Management Study, Volume I: Management Guidelines, by
Geomatics International Inc., May 1997.
Rouge Park Vegetation Management Study, Volume II: Pilot Study Site Plans, by
Geomatics International Inc., May 1997
It is anticipated that
prepared under its dir
Rouge Valley Park Planning Project, Phase One Report, Ba k
Options, November 5, 1991.
Rouge Valley Park Planning Project, Phase Two
February 18, 1992.
cept Alternatives,
Rouge Valley Park, Report No.3, Preliminary Mana m
The Toronto and Region Conservation Aut
information for both Duffins Creek and Pet'
ditional watershed
nd Housing will release documents
Consulting Team.
ATTACHMENT #1 TO THE TERMS OF REFERENCE
!"'<'
,:~/
,/
(
L..,:::""L1J,Lf-fT'-'- i
"'..J ' -""...'./
" " .' !
".
.-""
, ,
~
LEGEND
¡¡¿~
"",""'LL'."",,'
fill!!
""""".""'< """',..",.Y
~ÿ.
""'MH"",¡"^",,,
""""'.""";'M'"
,..""."",,"., , ""","'",
""""""-"""",.v"""""",,!,.,,,,,"
""",',,. "',"-D'
"',Kn."",'""""""""".""""."""",,.,
~_.