HomeMy WebLinkAboutFebruary 12, 2020Present Tom Copeland -Vice-Chair David Johnson -Chair Eric Newton (arrived at 7:05 pm) Denise Rundle Sean Wiley Also Present Deborah Wylie, Secretary-Treasurer Samantha O'Brien, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer. 1. Disclosure of Interest No disclosures of interest were noted. 2. Adoption of Agenda Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Denise Rundle Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers That the agenda for the Wednesday, February 12, 2020 meeting be adopted. 3. Adoption of Minutes Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Denise Rundle Carried That the minutes of the 1st meeting of the Committee of Adjustment held Wednesday, January 8, 2020 be adopted. Carried Page 1 of 16
4. Reports 4.1 (Deferred from the January 8, 2020 Meeting) PICA 03120-Revised 9004807 Canada Inc. (Stonepay) Tillings Road Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 7710119, to permit air conditioning units in the front yard between the front wall of the building or a dwelling and a street. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain site plan approval for Stacked Townhouses with air conditioning units located between the front main wall of a building and a street. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section stating their recommendation of the placement for the proposes air conditioning (NC) units on balconies greater than 600 mm above grade, to be placed no closer than 300 mm from the edge of the NC unit to the guard. Written comments were received from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority stating no objections to the application. Mike Pettigrew, agent with the Biglieri Group Ltd., was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. It was confirmed that Council Resolution #203-19 ( see Attachment #2 contained in the staff Report to the Committee of Adjustment dated February 12, 2020 for PICA 03120) allowing minor variance applications during the 2-year 'time out' period applies to the full Stonepay subdivision. In response to a question posed by a Committee Member regarding construction, Mike Pettigrew indicated the number of residential units with air conditioning units located between the building and the street have not yet been determined. In addition, the location of the air conditioning units on the balconies and the design of the balcony guard will be addressed based on the requirements of the Ontario Building Code. Committee Member, Eric Newton indicated he will abstain from voting, having arrived after PICA 03120 by 9004807 Canada Inc. (Stonepay) for Tillings Road was heard. Page 2 of 16
-C4of-p](KER1NG Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers Given the staff recommendation report, the recirculation of the new Notice of Public Hearing, the confidence that the Site Plan process will address necessary features of the proposal and that the application appears to meet the four tests of the Planning Act, Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Sean Wiley That application PICA 03120 by 9004807 Canada Inc. (Stonepay), be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law. 4.2 (Deferred from the January 8, 2020 Meeting) PICA 04120 G. Slater 1305 Luna Court Carried The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2520, as amended by By-law 406176 to permit a rear yard setback of 6.6 metres, whereas the by-law requires 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit for an existing covered platform. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from two property owners of Luna Court in support of the application. Gregory Slater, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In response to questions from Committee Members, Gregory Slater indicated his property is a semi-detached house where rear yards are separated by a fence. Page 3 of 16
Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers He stated that as previously approved by the Committee of Adjustment for PICA 67119, the 0.3 of a metre between the covered platform and the fence is enough space for proper yard maintenance. Gregory Slater noted that the deck existed when he first purchased the dwelling in 2014 and he added the covering himself. After hearing the applicant's comments and taking into consideration the support given by adjacent neighbours, as well as the application appearing to meet the four tests of the Planning Act, Sean Wiley moved the following motion: Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 04120 by G. Slater, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the covered platform, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2 & 3 contained in the staff Report to the Committee of Adjustment dated February 12, 2020). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by January 8, 2021, or this decision shall become null and void. 4.3 PICA 05120 Noir Investment Holdings Inc. 5321 Brock Road Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3037, as amended by By-law 6640106, to permit: • a minimum lot area of 0.29 of a hectare, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 0.8 of a hectare; and • a minimum lot frontage of 51.0 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 60 metres. The applicant requests approval of these variances to recognize the deficient lot area and lot frontage, in order to obtain a building permit for a new detached dwelling. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval. Page 4 of 16
Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority who have no objections to PICA 05120. They also indicated a TRCA permit is required and has received approval as of November 29, 2019. Written comments were received from the Durham Region Health Department stating no objections to the proposed application; further comments will be required at the building permit stage. Written comments were not received from CP Rail prior to the meeting. Albert Yuen, agent with Noir Design, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. After consideration of the Recommendation Report to the Committee of Adjustment from City staff, the approval received from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), the input received from other sources, and the application appearing to meet the four tests of the Planning Act, Sean Wiley moved the following motion: Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 05120 by Noir Investment Holdings Inc., be Approved on the grounds that the minimum lot area of 0.29 of a hectare and a minimum lot frontage of 51.0 metres, are in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, desirable for the appropriate development of the land and are minor in nature. 4.4 PICA 06120 K.Job 1117 Pine Glen Drive Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 4113192 to permit: • an uncovered platform and steps measuring 1.4 metres in height above grade to project 3.7 metres into the required rear yard, whereas the by-law requires uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project not more than 1.5 metres into the required rear yard; and Page 5 of 16
-C1of-p](KER]NG Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers • an uncovered platform and steps measuring 1.4 metres in height above grade to project 2.5 metres into the required (south) side yard, whereas the by-law requires uncovered steps or platforms not exceeding 1.0 metre in height above grade to project not more than 0.5 metres into the required side yard. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to recognize two non-conforming uncovered platforms (decks). The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing the applicant should ensure there are 0.6 metre offset from both side yards to the edge of the uncovered platforms. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section stating a complaint regarding construction in the rear yard was received. Inspectors investigated and determined a building permit had not been applied for. Subsequently, Building Permit #19-110403 was ~pplied for. Review of the application has determined Committee of Adjustment clearance is required. At this time, a permit has not yet been issued for the construction. Written comments were received from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) expressing no objections to the application. Kirk Job, applicant, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In response to questions from Committee Members, Kirk Job stated the structures were built approximately in October 2019 by a hired contractor for replacement of the previously existing uncovered platforms. Kirk Job indicated the contractor did not apply for a building permit and he was unaware one would be required for this type of work. After hearing the responses from the applicant, reviewing the staff Recommendation Report to the Committee of Adjustment and the application appearing to meet the four tests of the Planning Act, Tom Copeland moved the following motion: Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 06/20 by K. Job, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: Page 6 of 16
Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers 1. That these variances apply only to the uncovered platforms, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (refer to Exhibit 2 contained in the staff Report to the Committee of Adjustment dated February 12, 2020). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by February 11, 2021, or this decision shall become null and void. 4.5 PICA 07/20 Marshall Homes (Copperfield) Ltd. 395 Frontier Court (Lot 3) Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 2511, as amended by By-law 7610/18 to permit a rear yard setback of 5.4 metres, whereas the by-law requires 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct a single detached dwelling. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section expressing no concerns with the application. Written comments were received from a resident of Rougemount Drive expressing some concerns with the application. The resident would like compensation and/or planting of new trees or shrubs along the fence line to accommodate the loss of privacy from the reduced rear yard setback. Discussion between the applicant and the concerned resident of Rougemount Drive has taken place prior to the meeting, where the applicant has agreed to coordinate tree planting with the resident. Samantha Bateman, agent with Marshall Homes, was present to represent the application. Silvan Murray of Toynevale Road was present in opposition to the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. Silvan Murray stated privacy concerns with the subject site, specifically regarding the proposed height and window placements for the dwelling. Page 7 of 16
-C16f-p](KER]NG Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers In response to the privacy issues raised by Silvan Murray, Samantha Bateman indicated the height of the proposal is in conformity with the zoning by-law requirements. Furthermore, there will be no changes to the windows or design of the dwelling. Samantha Bateman stated a willingness to work with the concerned neighbours of Toynevale Road, adjacent to the subject site. In response to questions posed by Committee Members, Samantha Bateman stated the changes to the building permit included the addition of the loggia. She added that the applicant would be willing to plant trees on the subject site, however with it being freehold ownership, future landowners have the ability to alter such landscaping. When asked about future plans or potential to enclose the rear yard balcony, Samantha Bateman indicated no desire to alter the design at this time. After consideration of the neighbour's concerns, the overlook and distance from the proposed dwelling to adjacent properties, responses and the additional vegetation plans agreed to by the applicant, and the application appearing to meet the four tests of the Planning Act, Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Sean Wiley That application PICA 07120 by Marshall Homes (Copperfield) Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the detached dwelling and second storey balcony, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to the Revised Exhibit 2 attached to PICA 07120 Decision dated February 12, 2020). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by February 11, 2022, or this decision shall become null and void. 4.6 PICA 08120 V. Rudik 1855 Rosebank Road (Lot 6) Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1929184 to permit an interior side yard width of 0.6 of a metre, whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 1.2 metres. Page 8 of 16
Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct a single detached dwelling. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section expressing no concerns with the application. Written comments were received from a resident of Dencourt Drive in objection to the application. Samantha Bateman, agent with Marshall Homes, was present to represent the application. Victor Rudik, applicant, was also in attendance. Kim O'Reilly of Dencourt Drive and David Sanderson of Charnwood Court were present to address concerns at 1855 Rosebank Road, most specifically related to PICA 09120 (1855 Rosebank Ro'ad, Lot 8), and PICA 10120 (1855 Rosebank Road, Lot 9). No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In support of the application, Samantha Bateman advised the lot configuration and size has been approved and supported by the Region of Durham Land Division Committee, subject to conditions. In response to questions from Committee Members, Samantha Bateman indicated the purpose for the fifty per cent reduction of interior side yard width for Lot 6 is due to the unique "FlexHouz" dual suites design that is difficult to reduce and narrow the floorplan to meet the by-law requirement. When questioned about the possibility for air conditioning (A/C) units and fireplace installation, Samantha Bateman advised the placement of the AIC units are typically located at the rear of the dwellings. She indicated the lots allow for a small encroachment of a fireplace chimney permitted through zoning. Samantha Bateman described the design of the "FlexHouz" to include 1 single garage for the accessory suite and 1 double garage for the main portion of the dwelling. Furthermore, she stated the drawings labeled "Elevation A" for PICA 08120 for 1855 Rosebank Road, Lot 6 are in fact mirror images of what was submitted (refer to Exhibit 3 contained in PICA 08120 staff Report to the Committee of Adjustment dated February 12, 2020). After reviewing the staff Report and understanding that the greater side yard abuts a reduced yard, Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Page 9 of 16
Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Eric Newton Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers That application PICA 08/20 by V. Rudik, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (refer to Exhibit 2 contained in the staff Report to the Committee of Adjustment dated February 12, 2020). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by February 11, 2022, or this decision shall become null and void. Vote Tom Copeland David Johnson Eric Newton Denise Rundle Sean Wiley 4.7 PICA 09/20 V. Rudik in favour in favour in favour in favour opposed 1855 Rosebanl< Road (Lot 8) Carried The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1929/84 to permit a lot frontage minimum of 11.0 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot frontage of 13.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of this variance in order to obtain a building permit to construct a single detached dwelling. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department indicating a minimum side yard width of 0.6 of a metre to be maintained on the north side. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section expressing no concern with the application. Page 10 of 16
Committee of Adjustment . Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers Written comments were received from a resident of Dencourt Drive in objection to the application. Samantha Bateman, agent with Marshall Homes, was present to represent the application. Victor Rudik, applicant, was also in attendance. Kim O'Reilly of Dencourt Drive and David Sanderson of Charnwood Court were present in opposition to the application PICA 09/20 located at 1855 Rosebank Road, Lot 8. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In support of the application Samantha Bateman advised the property south of Lot 8 maintains the same built form and architectural design of what is purposed. Moreover the requested lot frontage of the property is similar to those in the neighbourhood with irregular lot shapes. Kim O'Rielly spoke in opposition to the application reiterating her submitted written comments. She stated she is unhappy with the submitted elevation drawings. Kim O'Rielly believes the proposed development is not compatible with the existing neighbourhood for the following reasons: • Existing dwellings in the neighbourhood have one driveway and front entrance to the dwelling, the proposed has two driveways and front entrances. This would increase the risk associated with additional vehicular use and storage, • The proposal results in a differing streetscape than the existing neighbourhood and is reducing greenspace in the community, • The 3-storey proposal is believed to be inconsistent with the neighbourhood that is mainly 2-storey dwellings which has a large impact on the existing streetscape, • Increased paving to accommodate additional driveway access of the proposal will result in increased drainage issues for the property and adjacent lands, • The proposal is designed to accommodate multi-generational living that is not the common built form and architectural design of the neighbourhood; and • The proposal advertises the dwellings to be over 4,000 square feet which would be some of the largest in the neighbourhood. A reduced design would allow for the by-law frontage requirements to be met. Prior to the Hearing, Samantha Bateman provided a letter responding to the concerns raised by Kim O'Rielly. The Committee Members and staff also received a copy of this letter. David Sanderson spoke in opposition to the application stating he believes it does not meet the four tests of the Planning Act where it is not "minor in nature" and "desirable for the appropriate development of the land". Page 11 of 16
Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers He noted two prior Ontario Municipal Board (0MB) Hearing cases that he believed to have similar concerns: March 28, 1989 (North York) and 1994 (Toronto). David Sanderson indicated the requested by-law variances would not be required if the drawings were revised and one dwelling removed to allow for additional space between lots. When asked about the square footage of the dwellings, Samantha Bateman stated they range from approximately 3,500 to 4,000 square feet, with the in-law suites approximately 600 square feet in compliance with the Ontario Building Code (OBC). She continued to describe the design of the "FlexHouz" as tailored to families with a dependent child, grandparent, accessible, and multi-generational living situation. Additionally, the frontage of Lot 8 is measured through the existing easement which is for access to the rear yard catch basin. In response to questions from the Committee Members, the Secretary-Treasurer stated the proposed, dwellings do comply with the zoning provisions for lot coverage. When questioned about current setbacks for existing dwellings in the neighbourhood, the Secretary-Treasurer indicated a detailed analysis has not been completed to comparatively evaluate the lots. When questioned by Committee Members about the possibility to convert the accessory suite into an "Airbnb" or rental unit, Samantha Bateman advised these dwellings are Freehold and it would be difficult for Marshall Homes to impose restrictions. In response to whether or not Marshall Homes would consider adding limitations through a list of their conditions on title, Samantha Bateman advised it could be taken under consideration and require review by their legal team. After listening to the comments and concerns addressed from two opposing parties, hearing the responses from the applicant, reviewing the staff Report and receiving additional information at the Hearing, Tom Copeland moved the following motion: Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 09/20 by V. Rudik, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variance is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance apply only to the subject dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (refer to Exhibit 2 contained in the staff Report to the Committee of Adjustment dated February 12, 2020). Page 12 of 16
Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by February 11, 2022, or this decision shall become null and void. 4.8 PICA 10120 V. Rudik 1855 Rosebank Road (Lot 9) Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 3036, as amended by By-law 1929184 to permit: • a minimum lot frontage of 11.3 metres, whereas the by-law requires 13.5 metres; • a minimum interior side yard width of 1.0 metre on the south side yard, whereas the by-law requires 1.2 metres; and • a minimum rear yard depth of 5.7 metres, whereas the by-law requires 7.5 metres. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain a building permit to construct a single detached dwelling. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to conditions. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section expressing no concern with the application. Written comments were received from a resident of Dencourt Drive in objection to the application. Samantha Bateman, agent with Marshall Homes, was present to represent the application. Victor Rudik, applicant, was also in attendance. Kim O'Reilly of Dencourt Drive and David Sanderson of Charnwood Court were present in opposition to the application PICA 09120 located at 1855 Rosebank Road, Lot 8. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. ' Kim O'Rielly and David Sanderson advised they would like to reiterate their comments and concerns from the previous application PICA 09120 for 1855 Rosebank Road (Lot 8), as they also apply to this application PICA 10120 for 1855 Rosebank Road (Lot 9). Page 13 of 16
-C1of-p](KER1NG Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers In support of the application, Samantha Bateman advised that the dwelling proposed for Lot 9 has a standard 2 car garage design. She elaborated on the layout and confirmed that it is 3-storeys. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Samantha Bateman advised the deck encroaches into the rear yard which is the reason for the associated requested variance. After consideration of the comments received, noting the oppositions, and the applicant's responses as well as the application appearing to meet the four tests of the Planning Act, Tom Copeland moved the following motion: Moved by Tom Copeland Seconded by Eric Newton That application PICA 10120 by V. Rudik, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these variances apply only to the subject dwelling, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plan (refer to Exhibit 2 contained in the staff Report to the Committee of Adjustment dated February 12, 2020). 2. That the applicant obtain a building permit for the proposed construction by February 11, 2022, or this decision shall become null and void. 4.9 PICA 11120 Kubota Canada Ltd. 1155 Kubota Drive Carried Unanimously The applicant requests relief from Zoning By-law 7364114, as amended by By-law 7659118, to permit: • a primary entrance door to be incorporated into the wall of the building facing the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a primary entrance door to be incorporated into the front wall of the building facing the front lot line, • a maximum front yard depth of 53.5 metres, whereas the by-law requires a maximum front yard depth of 5 metres, Page 14 of 16
--Ci:fo/--p](KER]NG Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers • parking between a building and the front lot line, whereas the by-law states in no case shall parking be permitted between a building and the front lot line; and • loading spaces in the front yard, whereas the by-law states no loading space shall be permitted in the front yard of any zone. The applicant requests approval of these variances in order to obtain site plan approval for a head office/assembly building. The Secretary-Treasurer outlined the staff recommendation from the City Development Department recommending approval subject to a condition. Written comments were received from the City's Engineering Services Department. expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from the City's Building Services Section expressing no comments on the application. Written comments were received from theToronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) expressing no objection to the application. Mike Pettigrew, agent, was present to represent the application. No further representation was present in favour of or in objection to the application. In response to a question from a Committee Member, Mike Pettigrew stated the subject site is at the site planning stage with the City of Pickering who is looking to develop a road network. When asked about the number of parking spot allocated to the front of the subject site, Mike Pettigrew indicated there to be approximately 8 dedicated parking spaces. Given that the application appears to meet the four tests of the Planning Act and after listening to the applicant's responses, Denise Rundle moved the following motion: Moved by Denise Rundle Seconded by Sean Wiley That application PICA 11/20 by Kubota Canada Ltd., be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, subject to the following condition: 1. That these variances apply only to the head office/assembly building, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant's submitted plans (refer to Exhibits 2 & 3 contained in the staff Report to the Committee of Adjustment dated February 12, 2020). Carried Unanimously Page 15 of 16
-Cif:iof-p](KER]NG 5. Adjournment Moved by Sean Wiley Seconded by Tom Copeland Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2020 7:00 pm Council Chambers That the 2nd meeting of the 2020 Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 8:26 pm and the next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment be held on Wednesday, March 11, 2020. Carried Unanimously Date Chair ' Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Page 16 of 16