HomeMy WebLinkAboutApril 24, 2019
Page 1 of 8
Minutes/Meeting Summary
Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee
April 24, 2019
7:00 pm
Main Committee Room
Attendees: N. Asgarali
S. Croteau
J. Dempsey
W. Jamadar
A. Khan
R. Smiles
C. Sopher
E. Martelluzzi, Planner II Heritage
V. Plouffe, Manager, Facilities Capital Projects
L. Roberts, Recording Secretary
Absent: E. John
B. George, Pickering Public Library
Guests: Sally Campbell
Item/
Ref #
Details & Discussion & Conclusion
(summary of discussion)
Action Items/Status
(include deadline as
appropriate)
1. Welcome & Introductions
E. Martelluzzi welcomed everyone to the meeting,
and introduced the guests in attendance.
2. Disclosure of Interest
No disclosures of interest were noted.
3. Review and Approval of Agenda
E. Martelluzzi reviewed the agenda items with the
inclusion of the Hastings Cemetery.
4. Approval of Minutes
-March 27, 2019
Moved by S. Croteau
That the minutes of the March 27, 2019 meeting of
the Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee be
approved.
-Cd:Jof-
p](KERJNG
Page 2 of 8
Item/
Ref #
Details & Discussion & Conclusion
(summary of discussion)
Action Items/Status
(include deadline as
appropriate)
Carried
5. Business Arising From Minutes
There were no items of business arising from the
minutes.
6. New Business
6.1 Heritage Permit HP 04/2019
405 Whitevale Road
E. Martelluzzi provided an overview of the heritage
permit application received for the Whitevale Park
Picnic Structure located at 405 Whitevale Road,
which is located south of the Whitevale Community
Centre and within the Whitevale Heritage
Conservation District. Through the aid of a
PowerPoint presentation, she outlined the proposal
for a new structure with a gable roof on a concrete
pad. She noted that a new structure was being
proposed as a result of severe wood rotting as well
as the metal roof collapsing. She noted that a
structural assessment had confirmed issues mostly
due to continuous moisture and lack of a structural
foundation.
V. Plouffe appeared before the Committee and
further outlined the 2018 report which had been
commissioned to determine the extent of damage
and the potential for salvage. He noted that City Staff
had consulted with the Whitevale District Residents
Association with respect to the materials to be used.
He provided details on the condition of the building,
as well as proposed materials to be used in the new
structure. He stated that by situating the entire
building on a concrete slab, it would allow for
improved drainage as well as a longer life.
A discussion ensued with Members questioning
accessibility of the site, removal of the gutters,
flooring materials, protection from erosion, as well as
the inclusion of signage in order to include
Page 3 of 8
Item/
Ref #
Details & Discussion & Conclusion
(summary of discussion)
Action Items/Status
(include deadline as
appropriate)
information on the site to help residents better
understand the significance of the site.
V. Plouffe provided rationale for not supporting the
use of wood over concrete for flooring material, and
the removal of the gutters. He also stated that once
finalized, he would circulate to the Members.
Moved by R. Smiles
That the Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee
recommends that Heritage Permit Application HP
04/19 be approved subject to the following
conditions:
1. That prior to final approval, the City Development
Department is provided with revised drawings
which show the following;
a) removal of the proposed gutters and
downspouts from the structure;
b) specifications for the colour and texture of the
roof material;
c) revised elevation drawings showing openings
which match the existing structure where
possible while still allowing safe and accessible
openings;
2. That any building materials that are salvaged
during demolition are to be used in the new
structure or stored for possible future restoration
projects on the site.
Carried
6.2 Heritage Permit HP 03/2019
3226 Gladstone Street
E. Martelluzzi provided members with a brief
overview of the heritage permit application submitted
for 3226 Gladstone Street. She stated the subject
lands are within the Whitevale Heritage Conservation
District and contain a detached dwelling and a one-
and-a-half storey shed. She noted the application
V. Plouffe to explore options
for signage
V. Plouffe to action
Page 4 of 8
Item/
Ref #
Details & Discussion & Conclusion
(summary of discussion)
Action Items/Status
(include deadline as
appropriate)
proposes a new replacement porch, enlarged
verandah, new one-and-a-half storey addition as well
as replacement windows and interior alterations.
Photos of the structure were provided which outline
the location for the alterations. She also indicated
that the consultant’s findings indicated the application
is generally compatible with the heritage home and
would not detract from the heritage character of the
District. E. Martelluzzi also provided details of the
applicant’s revisions just recently received, which
address some of the consultant’s comments.
Sally Campbell, the applicant, appeared before the
Committee providing background information on their
application, and noted that dormer windows were not
an uncommon feature for this style of building, and
also indicated that they felt the design was respectful
to the property and compatible with the District. She
noted they were in attendance to seek feedback from
the Committee. She explained the purpose of the
dormers was for increased living space as well as
additional light, and noted they would ensure the
dormer does not dominate the roof. Ms. Campbell
also provided photos of area homes outlining an
eclectic mix within the District which had been
accepted in the past. She also provided details of
where the addition would be, noting they would be
respecting the intent of the Whitevale District
Guidelines. She stated they had explored alternate
ways to increase their living space, but noted this
would achieve the space required and still respect
the character of the building.
A discussion period ensued with the following
comments and questions noted:
Window styles
Why are dormers a problem?
Who manages the guidelines?
Is notice required to area residents?
Is the property fully serviced and would this
effect the septic or landscaping?
Would existing trees on the property be
effected?
Is a landscaping plan necessary to submit?
Page 5 of 8
Item/
Ref #
Details & Discussion & Conclusion
(summary of discussion)
Action Items/Status
(include deadline as
appropriate)
Timelines for construction
Concrete foundation
Moved by A. Khan
That the Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee
recommends that Heritage Permit Application HP
04/19 be approved subject to the following
conditions:
1. That the dormer on the south facing elevation be
removed from the proposal;
2. That prior to final approval, the City Development
department is provided with revised drawings
which show the following:
a) revised south elevation drawing showing
removal of the dormer on the original south
roof;
b) specification or cut sheet for the proposed
wood and aluminum clad windows including
the dormer windows;
c) specification on paint colour selection; and
d) revised site plan showing location of any
proposed trees or shrubs which are to be of
native and/or heritage species.
Carried as amended
[Refer to following motion]
Moved by S. Croteau
That Item No. 1 and 2 a) of the main motion be
removed.
Carried
The following motion as amended was then Carried:
That the Heritage Pickering Advisory Committee
recommends that Heritage Permit Application HP
04/19 be approved subject to the following
conditions:
Page 6 of 8
Item/
Ref #
Details & Discussion & Conclusion
(summary of discussion)
Action Items/Status
(include deadline as
appropriate)
1. That prior to final approval, the City Development
department is provided with revised drawings
which show the following:
a) specification or cut sheet for the proposed
wood and aluminum clad windows including
the dormer windows;
b) specification on paint colour selection; and
c) revised site plan showing location of any
proposed trees or shrubs which are to be of
native and/or heritage species.
Further discussion ensued with Members expressing
concerns over losing the historical features of
heritage homes as well as the character of the area.
It was questioned why so many approvals are
granted with a lack of regard to the Whitevale District
Guidelines.
6.3 Workplan 2019
E. Martelluzzi provided Members with a copy of the
draft 2018 report and 2019 workplan to be presented
to Council.
Discussion ensued with the following items
suggested as additions to the workplan:
Continue to pursue designation efforts in the
Seaton area
Continue to move forward with a publicly
accessible mapping tool
Find ways to increase public awareness for
heritage properties, such as continuing with
the Doors Open program
Improve on line presence of Heritage
Pickering
E. Martelluzzi stated she would forward a final draft to
Members for review.
Members were also encouraged to attend
E. Martelluzzi to action
Page 7 of 8
Item/
Ref #
Details & Discussion & Conclusion
(summary of discussion)
Action Items/Status
(include deadline as
appropriate)
The Council meeting at which the report will be
presented.
7. Correspondence
7.1 Heritage Permits
E. Martelluzzi provided an explanation of the
delegation by-law recently passed by Council which
allows City Staff to approve certain heritage permits.
She provided an update on the recent approval for
2595 6th Concession, noting the applicant had
previously installed 2 dormers without a building
permit or heritage permit. The approved permit
includes approval to renovate the 2 dormers to create
one shed dormer. She stated the City did not object
to the design of the dormer, noting it would be clad in
white pine, with wood windows and asphalt roofing.
E. Martelluzzi responded to questions raised
regarding the consequences on the owner should the
City not approve an application, as well as follow up
procedures in order to ensure compliance.
7.2 Hastings Cemetery
E. Martelluzzi provided an update on the removal of
trees along Whitevale Road in close proximity to
Hastings Cemetery. She stated that in following up
with the Engineering Department, she was advised
that as a result of an archeological assessment being
required, safe access to the site was necessary for
testing purposes, therefore vegetation was required
to be removed.
Discussion ensued with concerns raised that some of
the requirements with the City’s Official Plan
respecting heritage properties are not being followed
as it pertains to maintaining the streetscape, and the
protection of vegetation. Concerns were raised
regarding vacant structures falling into disrepair such
as the Whitevale Schoolhouse. Staff noted that there
is a property management company that manages
the Infrastructure Ontario properties and that they
E. Martelluzzi to action
Page 8 of 8
Item/
Ref #
Details & Discussion & Conclusion
(summary of discussion)
Action Items/Status
(include deadline as
appropriate)
could be contacted to ensure security and
maintenance of such buildings.
8. Other Business
9. Next Meeting May 22
Adjournment
Meeting Adjourned: 8:52 pm
Copy: City Clerk